,,iii #aaeth ,,congress #ast ,session ,s4 ,,con4 ,,res4 #ab ,,in ,,the ,,senate ,,of ,,the ,,united ,,states ,april #d1 #bjag,mr4 ,grassley 7for himself1 ,mrs4 ,gillibrand1 and ,mr4 ,daines7 submitted the following concurrent resolution2 which was referred to the ,committee on ,veterans' ,affairs ,,concurrent ,,resolution ,expressing the sense of ,congress that those who served in the bays1 harbors1 and territorial seas of the ,republic of ,vietnam during the period beginning on ,january #i1 #aifb1 and ending on ,may #g1 #aige1 should be presumed to have served in the ,republic of ,vietnam for all purposes under the ,agent ,orange ,act of #aiia4 ,whereas section #aaaf7;f7 of title #ch1 ,united ,states ,code1 states that ,for the purposes of establishing service connection for a disability or death resulting from exposure to a herbicide agent1 including a presumption of service-connection under this section1 a veteran who1 during active military1 naval1 or air service1 served in the ,republic of ,vietnam during the period beginning on ,january #i1 #aifb1 and ending on ,may #g1 #aige1 shall be presumed to have been exposed during such service to an herbicide agent containing dioxin or #b1d-;dichlorophenoxyacetic acid1 and may be presumed to have been exposed during such service to any other chemical compound in an herbicide agent1 unless there is affirmative evidence to establish that the veteran was not exposed to any such agent during that service42 ,whereas the international definition and ,united ,states-recognized borders of the ,republic of ,vietnam includes the bays1 harbors1 and territorial seas of that ,republic2 ,whereas multiple scientific and medical sources1 including studies done by the ,government of ,australia1 have shown evidence of exposure to herbicide agents such as ,agent ,orange by those serving in the bays1 harbors1 and territorial seas of the ,republic of ,vietnam2 ,whereas veterans who served in the ,armed ,forces in the bays1 harbors1 and territorial seas of the ,republic of ,vietnam during the period beginning on ,january #i1 #aifb1 and ending on ,may #g1 #aige1 were exposed to this toxin through their ships' distillation processes1 air and water currents1 and the use of exposed water from inland sources1 such as water from near heavily sprayed ,monkey ,mountain1 delivered by exposed water barges2 ,whereas such veterans experience a significantly higher percentage of medical conditions associated with ,agent ,orange exposure compared to those in the regular populace2 ,whereas when passing the ,agent ,orange ,act of #aiia 7,public ,law #ajb-d71 ,congress did not differentiate between those who served on the inland waterways and on land versus those who served in the bays1 harbors1 and territorial seas of that ,republic2 ,whereas the purpose behind providing presumptive coverage for medical conditions associated with exposure to ,agent ,orange is because proving such exposure decades after its occurrence is not scientifically or medically possible2 and ,whereas thousands of veterans who served in the ,armed ,forces in the bays1 harbors1 and territorial seas of the ,republic of ,vietnam during the period beginning on ,january #i1 #aifb1 and ending on ,may #g1 #aige1 die at increasing rates every year3 ,now1 therefore1 be it ,that ,congress-- 7#a7 recognizes the intent of the ,agent ,orange ,act of #aiia 7,public ,law #ajb-d7 included the presumption that those veterans who served in the ,armed ,forces in the bays1 harbors1 and territorial seas of the ,republic of ,vietnam during the period beginning on ,january #i1 #aifb1 and ending on ,may #g1 #aige1 served in the ,republic of ,vietnam for all purposes under the ,agent ,orange ,act of #aiia2 7#b7 intends for those veterans who served in the ,armed ,forces during the period beginning on ,january #i1 #aifb1 and ending on ,may #g1 #aige1 in the bays1 harbors1 territorial seas1 inland waterways1 on the ground in the ,republic of ,vietnam1 and other areas exposed to ,agent ,orange1 and having been diagnosed with connected medical conditions to be equally recognized for such exposure through equitable benefits and coverage as those who served in the inland rivers and on the ,vietnamese land mass2 and 7#c7 calls on the ,secretary of ,veterans ,affairs to review the policy of the ,department of ,veterans ,affairs that excludes presumptive coverage for exposure to ,agent ,orange to veterans described in paragraph 7#a74