,,ii  #aae? ,,congress  #b;d ,session   
,s4 #cafi  ,,9 ,,! ,,s5ate ,,( ,,!      
,,unit$ ,,/ates  ,june #bh1 #bjah,mr4   
,m55dez 7= himself1 ,mr4 ,w>n]1 & ,mr4  
,re$7 introduc$ ! foll[+ bill2 :i* 0    
read twice & ref]r$ to ! ,committee on  
,=eign ,relations  ,a ,,bill  ,to       
e/abli% z ,unit$ ,/ates policy t1 p5d+  
confirmation ( ! ,russian ,f$]ation's   
cont9u$ compliance ) ,new ,,/>t1 !      
,unit$ ,/ates %\ld ext5d ,new ,,/>t     
?r\gh #bjbf4  #a4 ,%ort title ,?is ,act 
may be cit$ z ! ,new ,,/>t ,policy ,act 
( #bjah4  #b4 ,new ,,/>t def9$ ,9 ?is   
,act1 ! t]m ,new ,,/>t means ! ,treaty  
betwe5 ! ,unit$ ,/ates ( ,am]ica & !    
,russian ,f$]ation on ,measures = !     
,fur!r ,r$uction & ,limitation (        
,/rategic ,(f5sive ,arms1 sign$ ,april  
#h1 #bjaj1 & ent]$ into =ce ,febru>y #e1
 #bjaa 7commonly kn[n z ! ,new ,,/>t    
,treaty74  #c4 ,f9d+s ,congress makes ! 
foll[+ f9d+s3 7#a7 ,s9ce ! end ( ,_w ,w>
 ,,ii1 ! ,unit$ ,/ates has reli$ on a   
robu/ & effective nucle> det]r5t z "p ( 

our national def5se1 p>ticul>ly aga9/ ! 
,soviet ,union & its successor /ate1 !  
,russian ,f$]ation4  7#b7 ,9 t&em ) our 
nucle> det]r5t1 ! ,unit$ ,/ates pursu$ a
 numb] ( arms control1 dis>mam5t1 &     
nonprolif]ation agreem5ts ) ! ,soviet   
,union z a means ( ensur+ /rategic      
/ability & ,unit$ ,/ates def5se ( !     
homel&1 su* z ! ,/rategic ,arms         
,limitation ,treaty & ! ,/rategic ,arms 
,r$uction ,treaty4  7#c7 ,! ,nucle>     
,po/ure ,review issu$ 9 ,febru>y #bjah  
/ates t arms control agreem5ts dur+ !   
,cold ,w> increas$ transp>5cy1 mod]at$  
competition1 codifi$ r\gh p>ity 9       
/rategic nucle> areas1 & clos$ (f areas 
( competition4  7#d7 ,9 ! aft]ma? ( !   
fall ( ! ,soviet ,union1 ! ,unit$ ,/ates
 cont9ues to rely on a comb9ation (     
nucle> det]r5ce & /rategic arms control 
to protect ! ,unit$ ,/ates f nucle>     
attack4  7#e7 ,on ,april #h1 #bjaj1 !   
,unit$ ,/ates & ! ,russian ,f$]ation    
sign$ ! ,new ,/rategic ,arms ,r$uction  
,treaty 7,new ,,/>t74  7#f7 ,9 an op-ed 

to ! ,wa%+ton ,po/ dat$ ,decemb] #b1    
#bjaj1 =m] ,secret>ies ( ,/ate ,h5ry ,a4
 ,kiss+]1 ,george ,p4 ,%ultz1 ,james ,a4
 ,bak] ,,iii1 ,lawr5ce ,s4 ,eagleburg]1 
& ,col9 ,l4 ,p[ell all urg$ ! ,s5ate to 
ratify ,new ,,/>t1 /at+ t x 0 9 !       
national int]e/ to ratify4  7#g7 ,dur+ !
 ratification process1 ,new ,,/>t g>n]$ 
bip>tisan support1 & ! ,unit$ ,/ates    
,s5ate approv$ ,new ,,/>t on ,decemb]   
#bb1 #bjaj1 by a #ga-bf vote4  7#h7 ,new
 ,,/>t ent]$ into =ce on ,febru>y #e1   
#bjaa1 plac+ limitations on ,unit$      
,/ates & ,russian /rategic sy/ems1      
includ+ int]cont95tal balli/ic missiles1
 subm>9e laun*$ balli/ic missiles1 &    
heavy bomb]s1 z well z w>heads t ?reat5$
 ! ,unit$ ,/ates4  7#i7 ,on ,febru>y #e1
 #bjah1 ! c5tral limits on ,unit$ ,/ates
 & ,russia /rategic nucle> ars5als took 
effect4  7#aj7 ,9 ,m>* #bjah1 ! ,unit$  
,/ates & ! ,russian ,f$]ation ex*ang$   
data on _! respective /rategic nucle>   
ars5als 9 accordance ) ! ,treaty4  7#aa7
 ,?r\gh ! ,treaty's v]ification regime1 

:i* includes %ort-notice1 on-site       
inspections at milit>y bases &          
facilities1 ! ,unit$ ,/ates is able to  
v]ify ! data provid$ by ! ,russian      
,f$]ation reg>d+ its /rategic nucle>    
ars5al4 ,! v]ification regime provides  
bo? c\ntries insight into ea* o!r's     
/rategic nucle> deliv]y sy/ems1 w>heads1
 & facilities1 z well z data ex*anges to
 track ! /atus & makeup ( nucle> weapons
 sy/ems4  7#ab7 ,dur+ a ,m>* #bjag he>+ 
( ! ,committee on ,arm$ ,s]vices ( !    
,h\se ( ,repres5tatives on nucle>       
det]r5ce requirem5ts1 ,comm&] ( ! ,unit$
 ,/ates ,/rategic ,comm& 7,,/ratcom7 &  
,air ,=ce ,g5]al ,john ,hyt5 voic$ 8    
en?usia/ic support = ! ,treaty1 say+ he 
0 a big support] & /at+ :5 x comes to   
nucle> weapons & nucle> capabilities1 t 
bilat]al1 v]ifiable arms control        
agreem5ts are ess5tial to our ability to
 provide an effective det]r5t4  7#ac7 ,9
 ! same he>+1 ,air ,=ce ,g5]al ,paul    
,selva1 ! ,vice ,*airman ( ! ,jo9t      
,*iefs ( ,/aff1 also endors$ ! treaty1  

say+ ,new ,,/>t is a bilat]al1 v]ifiable
 agreem5t t gives u "s degree (         
pr$ictability on :at our pot5tial       
adv]s>ies look l4  7#ad7 ,lieut5ant     
,g5]al ,jack ,we9/e91 ! ,air ,=ce       
,deputy ,*ief ( ,/aff = ,/rategic       
,det]r5ce & ,nucle> ,integration1 ass]t$
 t ,new ,,/>t 0 ( huge value to ,unit$  
,/ates security4  7#ae7 ,! ,nucle>      
,po/ure ,review /ates t arms control    
agreem5ts c fo/] transp>5cy1 und]/&+1 & 
pr$ictability 9 adv]s>y relations1 !reby
 r$uc+ ! risk ( misund]/&+ &            
miscalculation4  7#af7 ,new ,,/>t       
/r5g!ns ,unit$ ,/ates nucle> security & 
/rategic /ability by r$uc+ ! numb] (    
/rategic sy/ems 9 ,russia's nucle>      
ars5al & provides ! ,unit$ ,/ates ) !   
inspection & monitor+ tools necess>y to 
confid5tly v]ify ,russian compliance )  
,new ,,/>t4  7#ag7 ,new ,,/>t does n    
re/rict ,unit$ ,/ates nucle>            
mod]nization programs or limit ,unit$   
,/ates missile def5se ef=ts4  #d4       
,/atem5t ( policy ,unless ! ,presid5t   

det]m9es & s in=ms ,congress t ,russia  
is n 9 mat]ial compliance ) ,new ,,/>t1 
x is ! policy ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates to ext5d
 ,new ,,/>t f its initial t]m9ation date
 9 ,febru>y #bjba to ,febru>y #bjbf1 z  
all[$ 9 ! ,treaty4