,h4 ,,res4 #igj  ,in the ,house of      
,representatives1 ,u4 ,s41  ,june #bh1  
#bjah  ,,resolution  ,whereas the power 
of the ,congress to conduct             
investigations is inherent in the       
legislative process4 ,that power is     
broad4 ,it encompasses inquiries        
concerning the administration of        
existing laws as well as proposed or    
possibly needed statutes and comprehends
 probes into departments of the ,federal
 ,government to expose corruption1      
inefficiency or waste4 7,watkins v4     
,united ,states 7#ced ,u4,s4 #agh1      
#ahg772 ,whereas a necessary corollary  
of ,congress's oversight and            
investigative authority is the power to 
issue and enforce subpoenas4 ,the       
,issuance of subpoenas 4 4 4 has long   
been held to be a legitimate use by     
,congress of its power to investigate4  
7,eastland v4 ,u4,s4 ,serviceman's ,fund
 7#dba ,u4,s4 #dia1 #ejd772 ,whereas    
,chairman ,devin ,nunes of the          
,permanent ,select ,committee on        

,intelligence of the ,house of          
,representatives requested information  
on potential abuses of the ,foreign     
,intelligence ,surveillance ,act in a   
,march #h1 #bjag1 letter to the         
,department of ,justice2 ,whereas the   
,committee reviewed responsive documents
 on ,march #ag1 #bjag1 but thereafter   
the ,department of ,justice refused to  
make the documents available2 ,whereas  
,chairman ,nunes issued a subpoena on   
,august #bd1 #bjag to include the       
documents sought on ,march #h1 #bjag2   
,whereas the ,department of ,justice    
came to substantially comply with the   
subpoena #aj months after the subpoena  
and more than one year from the original
 request2 ,whereas ,chairman ,nunes     
sought documents related to #i current  
or former ,department of ,justice       
personnel in a ,march #bc1 #bjah letter2
 ,whereas the ,department of ,justice   
complied with the request relating to   
one individual on ,may #h1 #bjah1 but   
has yet to fully comply with the other  

requests2 ,whereas ,chairman ,nunes sent
 a letter classified ,,secret on ,april 
#bd1 #bjah1 followed by a subpoena on   
,april #cj1 #bjah1 which demanded the   
production of all documents related to  
the issue identified in the earlier     
letter2 ,whereas compliance with this   
letter and subpoena has to date been    
limited to briefings and access to      
supporting documents1 which have not    
been provided to all of the ,members and
 cleared staff of the ,permanent ,select
 ,committee on ,intelligence2 ,whereas  
the exclusion of the ,members and       
cleared staff from access to these      
briefings and supporting documents      
amounts to non-compliance with the      
,april #cj subpoena2 ,whereas on        
,october #bd1 #bjag1 the ,committees on 
the ,judiciary and ,oversight and       
,government ,reform opened a joint      
investigation into the decisions made by
 the ,department of ,justice in #bjaf   
and #bjag related to its handling of the
 investigation of the emails of former  

,secretary of ,state ,hillary ,clinton2 
,whereas on ,november #c1 #bjag1        
,chairman ,goodlatte1 ,chairman ,gowdy1 
and four ,members of ,congress sent a   
letter to ,attorney ,general ,sessions  
and ,deputy ,attorney ,general          
,rosenstein requesting #e specific      
categories of documents2 ,whereas on    
,december #ab1 #bjag1 ,chairman         
,goodlatte1 ,chairman ,gowdy1 and other 
,members sent a letter emphasizing the  
expectation that the ,department of     
,justice provide all requested documents
 as well as a privilege log2 ,whereas on
 ,february #a1 #bjah1 ,chairman         
,goodlatte sent a letter requesting     
documents related to potential ,foreign 
,intelligence ,surveillance ,act abuses2
 ,whereas the ,department of ,justice   
has missed document production          
deadlines1 produced duplicative pages of
 information1 and redacted pages to the 
point where they contain no probative   
information2 ,whereas the ,committee on 
the ,judiciary issued a subpoena to     

,deputy ,attorney ,general ,rosenstein  
on ,march #bb1 #bjah1 which compelled   
him to produce1 among other things--    
7#a7 all documents and communications   
referring or relating to internal       
,department of ,justice or ,federal     
,bureau of ,investigation management    
requests to review1 scrub1 report on1 or
 analyze any reporting of ,foreign      
,intelligence ,surveillance ,act        
collection involving1 or coverage       
mentioning1 the ,trump campaign or the  
,trump administration1  7#b7 all        
documents and communications referring  
or relating to defensive briefings      
provided by the ,department of ,justice 
or the ,federal ,bureau of              
,investigation to the #bjaf presidential
 campaigns of ,hillary ,clinton or      
,president ,trump1 and  7#c7 all        
documents and communications referring  
or relating to proposed1 recommended1 or
 actual ,foreign ,intelligence          
,surveillance ,act coverage on the      
,clinton ,foundation or persons         

associated or in communication with the 
,clinton ,foundation2 and  ,whereas the 
,department of ,justice has failed to   
comply with the ,march #bb subpoena by  
failing to substantially comply with the
 demand for the production of all of    
these categories of documents3 ,now1    
therefore1 be it ,that the ,house of    
,representatives insists that1 by not   
later than ,july #f1 #bjah1 the         
,department of ,justice fully comply    
with the requests1 including subpoenas1 
of the ,permanent ,select ,committee on 
,intelligence and the subpoena issued by
 the ,committee on the ,judiciary       
relating to potential violations of the 
,foreign ,intelligence ,surveillance    
,act by personnel of the ,department of 
,justice and related matters4  ,clerk4