,,iv #aae? ,,congress #b;d ,session ,h4 ,,res4 #iea ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,( ,,repres5tatives ,june #bj1 #bjah,mr4 ,wilson ( ,s\? ,c>ol9a submitt$ ! foll[+ resolution2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee on ,=eign ,affairs ,,resolution ,express+ conc]n ) respect to ! ,gov]nm5t ( ,turkey's anticipat$ pur*ase ( ,russian ,s-#djj surface-to-air missile batt]ies1 & = o!r purposes4 ,:]eas ,turkey has be5 a *]i%$ memb] ( ! ,nor? ,atlantic ,treaty ,organization 7,,nato7 s9ce #aieb & is behold5 to ,,nato's collective def5se pl$ge1 :]e9 ! allies integrate _! %ips1 planes1 & weapons sy/ems & %>e comm& across ! alliance2 ,:]eas ,turkey has provid$ valuable contributions z a ,,nato ally f ! ,korean ,w> to ! ,global ,w> on ,t]rorism & has be5 ho/+ #c1bjj1jjj ,syrian refugees & ne>ly #cjj1jjj ,afghan & ,iraqi refugees2 ,:]eas1 on ,decemb] #bi1 #bjag1 ,turkey & ! ,russian ,f$]ation sign$ an accord = ,russia to provide ,turkey ) at lea/ two ,s-#djj surface-to-air missile batt]ies 9 ! ,turki% ,gov]nm5t's ef=ts improve its def5se capabilities amid ?reats f ,kurdi% & ,islami/ militants at home & conflicts across its bord]s 9 ,syria & ,iraq2 ,:]eas ,turkey's ,und]secret>iat = ,def5se ,indu/ries /at$ t ,russia w\ld supply ! ,s-#djj missile batt]ies to ,turkey 9 an initial deliv]y plann$ = ! fir/ qu>t] ( #bjbj2 ,:]eas ,turkey's ,und]secret>iat = ,def5se ,indu/ries has /at$ t ! ,s-#djj missile batt]ies w\ld be us$ & manag$ indep5d5tly by ,turki% p]sonnel1 r ?an ,russian advisors2 ,:]eas ,turkey's ,und]secret>iat = ,def5se ,indu/ries has ass]t$ t "u ! accord ! arm$ =ces ( ,turkey w\ld h full control ov] ! ,s-#djj missile batt]ies1 b w\ld coop]ate ) ,russia = te*nological ga9s & jo9t developm5t2 ,:]eas ,turkey has s\ght to secure def5se agreem5ts ) o!r c\ntries 9 addition to ,russia1 includ+ sign+ a lett] ( int5t ) ,france & ,italy to /r5g!n coop]ation on jo9t def5se projects2 ,:]eas1 on ,april #a1 #bjad1 ,,nato unanim\sly decid$ to susp5d coop]ation ) ,russia 9 response to ,russia's milit>y aggression 9 ,ea/]n ,ukra9e & 9 ,crimea result+ 9 m ?an #aj1jjj dea?s2 & ,:]eas ! ,s-#djj missile batt]ies _c be integrat$ into ,,nato's milit>y ar*itecture1 z ,russia is n a ,,nato ally1 & !re=e ! ,s-#djj missile batt]ies are n compatible ) ,,nato's def5ses3 ,n[1 !re=e1 be x ,t ! ,h\se ( ,repres5tatives-- 7#a7 /ates unequivocally t ! ,unit$ ,/ates is obligat$ to speak out aga9/ any ?reat to ,,nato int]op]ability1 any exposure ( ,,nato assets to ho/ile actors1 or any degradation ( ! g5]al security ( ,,nato memb] c\ntries2 7#b7 comm5ds ,turkey = its long-/&+ relation%ip ) ! ,unit$ ,/ates & = be+ a valu$ ally 9 ,europe & ! ,middle ,ea/2 7#c7 affirms a desire to ma9ta9 a productive relation%ip gr\nd$ 9 a %>$ respect = ,,nato & ess5tial democratic values2 7#d7 expresses conc]n t ! ,gov]nm5t ( ,turkey's anticipat$ pur*ase ( ,russian ,s-#djj surface-to-air missile batt]ies ?reat5s ,,nato int]op]ability2 & 7#e7 enc\rages ,turkey to realign its def5se procurem5t /rategy to comply ) ,,nato & 9 turn /r5g!n ,,nato's response capability4