,,iv #aae? ,,congress #a/ ,session ,h4 ,,res4 #ch ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,( ,,repres5tatives ,janu>y #aj1 #bjag,mr4 ,*affetz submitt$ ! foll[+ resolution2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee on ,ov]sight & ,gov]nm5t ,re=m1 & 9 addition to ! ,committee on ,arm$ ,s]vices1 = a p]iod to be subsequ5tly det]m9$ by ! ,speak]1 9 ea* case = consid]ation ( su* provisions z fall )9 ! jurisdiction ( ! committee conc]n$ ,,resolution ,express+ ! s5se ( ! ,h\se ( ,repres5tatives t (fices atta*$ to ! seat ( ,gov]nm5t %\ld n be requir$ to ex]cise _! (fices 9 ! ,di/rict ( ,columbia4 ,:]eas section #gb ( title #d1 ,unit$ ,/ates ,code1 requires all (fices atta*$ to ! seat ( ,gov]nm5t to be ex]cis$ 9 ! ,di/rict ( ,columbia2 ,:]eas ) ! developm5t ( mod]n communication te*nologies & ! increas$ ease ( travel1 ,f$]al ag5cies are able to p]=m _! duties f areas outside ! ,di/rict ( ,columbia2 ,:]eas bas$ on ! in=mation collect$ by ! #bjaj ,unit$ ,/ates ,c5sus1 !re is a correlation betwe5 ! c5tralization ( ,f$]al ag5cies 9 ! ,di/rict ( ,columbia & ! m$ian income ( ! metropolitan area ( ! ,di/rict ( ,columbia1 :i* is high] ?an ! m$ian income ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates2 ,:]eas ,f$]al ag5cies employ ?\s&s ( individuals & provide jobs & economic b5efits to ! areas 9 :i* ! ag5cies are locat$2 ,:]eas ! focus ( _m ,f$]al ag5cies involves indu/ries locat$ 9 areas across ! ,unit$ ,/ates & outside ! ,di/rict ( ,columbia2 & ,:]eas ! impact ( regulations c be p]ceiv$ m easily by ^? individuals :o are proximate to ! affect$ indu/ries3 ,n[1 !re=e1 be x ,t ! ,h\se ( ,repres5tatives-- 7#a7 recognizes t x is no long] necess>y = all ,f$]al ag5cies to be locat$ 9 ! ,di/rict ( ,columbia2 7#b7 det]m9es t ,executive ag5cies1 z def9$ 9 section #aje ( title #e1 ,unit$ ,/ates ,code1 & milit>y dep>tm5ts1 z def9$ 9 section #ajb ( su* title1 %\ld be relocat$ outside ! ,di/rict ( ,columbia2 & 7#c7 calls on ! head ( ea* ,executive ag5cy & milit>y dep>tm5t to recomm5d appropriate alt]nate locations ?r\gh\t ! ,unit$ ,/ates to :i* _! respective ag5cy or milit>y dep>tm5t c be relocat$4