,,iv #aaeth ,,congress #b;d ,session ,h4 ,,res4 #ajfi ,,in ,,the ,,house ,,of ,,representatives ,september #ac1 #bjah,ms4 ,gabbard for herself and ,mr4 ,jones7 submitted the following resolution2 which was referred to the ,committee on ,foreign ,affairs ,,resolution ,requiring the ,president to seek congressional authorization prior to any engagement of the ,united ,states ,armed ,forces against any adversary4 ,whereas ,president ,trump has clearly indicated an intention to use the ,united ,states ,armed ,forces against ,syria1 ,russia1 and ,iran and has not presented a plan to ,congress1 consulted with ,congress1 or sought authorization from ,congress for the use of such forces2 ,whereas ,congress has not authorized the use of military force against ,syrian1 ,iranian1 or ,russian armed forces in any capacity1 and has not declared war against any such governments2 ,whereas ,congress has the sole power to declare war under article ,i1 section #h1 of the ,constitution2 ,whereas ,section #c of the ,war ,powers ,resolution 7#ej ,u4,s4,c4 #aedb7 requires the ,president1 in every possible instance1 to consult with ,congress before introducing the ,armed ,forces into situations of hostilities or imminent hostilities1 and to continue consultations while the ,armed ,forces remain in such situations2 ,whereas ,section #ijah of the ,department of ,defense ,appropriations ,act1 #bjah 7,division ,c of ,public ,law #aae-ada71 states ,none of the funds made available by this ,act may be used with respect to ,syria in contravention of the ,war ,powers ,resolution 7#ej ,u4,s4,c4 #aeda et seq471 including for the introduction of ,united ,states armed or military forces into hostilities in ,syria1 into situations in ,syria where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances1 or into ,syrian territory1 airspace1 or waters while equipped for combat1 in contravention of the congressional consultation and reporting requirements of sections #c and #d of that law 7#ej ,u4,s4,c4 7#f7 #aedb and #aedc742 ,whereas1 on ,september #aj1 #bjah1 ,president ,trump's ,national ,security ,advisor ,john ,bolton warned that ,syria would face a much stronger ,united ,states response than the airstrikes on the ,syrian government in ,april #bjag and ,april #bjah2 ,whereas1 on ,september #f1 #bjah1 the ,united ,states ,state ,department ,representative for ,syria ,engagement1 ,james ,jeffrey1 stated that now the ,united ,states will not tolerate an attack4 ,period4 and that ,any offensive is to us objectionable as a reckless escalation42 ,whereas1 on ,september #g1 #bjah1 the ,united ,states ,ambassador to the ,united ,nations alluded to warfare when warning ,syria1 ,russia1 and ,iran of dire consequences for actions taken in ,idlib1 ,syria2 and ,whereas1 on ,september #ab1 #bjah1 the ,united ,states ,ambassador to the ,united ,nations stated that not just chemical weapons would be addressed by the ,united ,states and our allies4 ,but any offenses on the civilian people on ,idlib was going to be dealt with3 ,now1 therefore1 be it ,that it is the sense of the ,house of ,representatives that-- 7#a7 the ,president is required-- 7,a7 to seek congressional authorization prior to any engagement of the ,united ,states ,armed ,forces against ,syria1 ,iran1 or ,russia2 and 7,b7 to consult with ,congress in every possible instance before introducing the ,armed ,forces into situations of hostilities or imminent hostilities1 in accordance with ,section #c of the ,war ,powers ,resolution 7#ej ,u4,s4,c4 #aedb72 and 7#b7 the use of the ,armed ,forces without congressional authorization is illegal and unconstitutional under article ,i1 section #h of the ,constitution4