,,iv  #aae? ,,congress  #b;d ,session   
,h4 ,,res4 #ajbh  ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,(    
,,repres5tatives  ,july #be1 #bjah ,mr4 
,mead[s 7= himself1 ,mr4 ,jordan1 ,mr4  
,jody ,b4 ,hice ( ,georgia1 ,mr4 ,duncan
 ( ,s\? ,c>ol9a1 ,mr4 ,biggs1 ,mr4      
,gohm]t1 ,mr4 ,gaetz1 ,mr4 ,des,jarlais1
 ,mr4 ,gos>1 ,mr4 ,posey1 & ,mr4 ,p]ry7 
submitt$ ! foll[+ resolution2 :i* 0     
ref]r$ to ! ,committee on ! ,judici>y   
,,resolution  ,impea*+ ,rod ,ros5/e91 ! 
,deputy ,attorney ,g5]al ( ! ,unit$     
,/ates1 = high crimes & misdemeanors4   
,t ,rod ,ros5/e91 ,deputy ,attorney     
,g5]al ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates1 is impea*$ =  
high crimes & misdemeanors1 & t ! foll[+
 articles ( impea*m5t be exhibit$ to !  
,s5ate3  ,articles ( impea*m5t exhibit$ 
by ! ,h\se ( ,repres5tatives ( ! ,unit$ 
,/ates ( ,am]ica 9 ! "n ( itself & all (
 ! p ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates ( ,am]ica1 aga9/ 
,rod ,ros5/e91 ,deputy ,attorney ,g5]al 
( ! ,unit$ ,/ates1 9 ma9t5ance & support
 ( its impea*m5t aga9/ him = high crimes
 & misdemeanors4  ,article ,i  ,on ,m>* 

#b1 #bjag1 ,attorney ,g5]al ,jeff       
,sessions recus$ himself f any matt]    
pot5tially relat+ to ! #bjaf campaign4  
,^u ! ,attorney ,g5]al's recusal1       
,deputy ,attorney ,g5]al ,rod ,ros5/e9  
assum$ responsibility to ov]see !       
,dep>tm5t's response to ! congressional 
inve/igations ( ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,ju/ice & 
,,fbi4  ,on ,july #bg1 #bjag1 ,h\se     
,judici>y ,*airman ,bob ,goodlatte & #ai
 ,memb]s ( ,congress reque/$ a second   
,special ,c\nsel to conduct a           
compreh5sive inve/igation into matt]s   
relat$ to ! #bjaf ,presid5tial campaign 
t appe> to be outside ! scope ( ,special
 ,c\nsel ,muell]'s inve/igation4  ,on   
,septemb] #bf1 #bjag1 ,h\se ,judici>y   
,*airman ,bob ,goodlatte & #ac ,memb]s (
 ,congress s5t a lett] repeat+ ! call = 
a second ,special ,c\nsel4  ,on ,m>* #f1
 #bjah1 ,*airman ,goodlatte & ,*airman  
,g[dy call$ = ! appo9tm5t ( a second    
,special ,c\nsel to inve/igate ^! matt]s
 due to ! actual or pot5tial conflicts (
 int]e/s relat$ to c]ta9 prosecutorial &

 inve/igative decisions made & n made by
 ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,ju/ice 9 #bjaf & #bjag4 
,on ,m>* #bi1 #bjah1 ,attorney ,g5]al   
,sessions wrote 9 a lett] to ,*airman   
,*uck ,grassley1 ,*airman ,bob          
,goodlatte1 & ,*airman ,trey ,g[dy t he 
w\ld n appo9t a second ,special ,c\nsel 
to inve/igate ^! matt]s despite ! app>5t
 & actual conflicts ( int]e/s ( curr5t &
 =m] ,dep>tm5t ( ,ju/ice & ,,fbi        
employees4  ,on ,may #bb1 #bjah1 ,rep4  
,lee ,zeld91 along ) #ca ,memb]s (      
,congress1 introduc$ ,h4 ,res4 #ijg1 a  
resolution express+ ! s5se ( ,congress t
 ! ,attorney ,g5]al %\ld appo9t a second
 ,special ,c\nsel4  ,on ,july #ba1      
#bjah1 ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,ju/ice releas$ a  
heavily r$act$ set ( docum5ts conta9+ ! 
,c>t] ,page ,,fisa w>rant application & 
subsequ5t r5ewals4 ,^u review+ !        
docum5ts1 x is evid5t ,deputy ,attorney 
,g5]al ,ros5/e9 sign$ an ,,fbi          
application to r5ew ,,fisa surveillance 
on ,c>t] ,page4  ,z su*1 8 conduct 9    
au?oriz+ ! ,,fisa surveillance at issue 

9 ! jo9t congressional inve/igation     
makes him a fact witness c5tral to !    
ongo+ inve/igation ( pot5tial ,,fisa    
abuse4 ,deputy ,attorney ,g5]al         
,ros5/e9's failure to recuse himself 9  
light ( ?is inh]5t conflict ( int]e/ &  
failure to recomm5d ! appo9tm5t ( a     
second ,special ,c\nsel con/itute       
d]eliction ( duty4  ,:]e=e1 ,rod        
,ros5/e91 by su* conduct1 w>rants       
impea*m5t & trial1 & removal f (fice4   
,article ,,ii  ,mr4 ,ros5/e9 & !        
,dep>tm5t ( ,ju/ice h repeat$ly fail$ to
 produce docum5ts reque/$ by !          
,committee on ! ,judici>y & ! ,committee
 on ,ov]sight & ,gov]nm5t ,re=m1 despite
 ! committees' con/itutional duty to    
conduct ov]sight ( ! ,,fbi & broad]     
,dep>tm5t ( ,ju/ice4  ,on ,octob] #bd1  
#bjag1 ! ,committee on ,judici>y & !    
,committee on ,ov]sight & ,gov]nm5t     
,re=m op5$ a jo9t inve/igation into !   
decisions made by ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,ju/ice 
9 #bjaf & #bjag relat$ to _! h&l+ ( !   
,secret>y ,cl9ton email inve/igation4   

,on ,novemb] #c1 #bjag1 ,*airman        
,goodlatte1 ,*airman ,g[dy1 & f\r       
,memb]s ( ,congress1 s5t a lett] to     
,attorney ,g5]al ,sessions & ,deputy    
,attorney ,g5]al ,ros5/e9 reque/+       
docum5ts relat$ to c]ta9 prosecutorial &
 inve/igative decisions ! ,dep>tm5t (   
,ju/ice's made dur+ ! #bjaf election4   
,on ,decemb] #ab1 #bjag1 ,*airman       
,goodlatte1 ,*airman ,g[dy1 & o!r memb]s
 s5t a lett] 9 fur!rance ( _! previ\s   
docum5t reque/s1 urg+ ! ,dep>tm5t to    
provide )held docum5ts1 & to comply ) ! 
,committees' previ\s in/ructions to     
provide a privilege log = docum5ts )held
 or r$act$ on ! basis ( a privilege4    
,mr4 ,ros5/e9 & ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,ju/ice h 
refus$ to provide a privilege log = ^!  
docum5ts1 despite produc+ docum5ts to   
,congress t are s r$act$ !y conta9      
little probative in=mation4  ,on        
,febru>y #a1 #bjah1 ,*airman ,goodlatte 
s5t a lett] reque/+ docum5ts relat$ to  
alleg$ abuses ( ! ,=eign ,intellig5ce   
,surveillance ,act 7,,fisa7 relat$ to   

memb]s ( ! ,trump campaign4 ,z ,deputy  
,attorney ,g5]al ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates1 ,mr4
 ,ros5/e9 is to act on behalf ( !       
,attorney ,g5]al = purposes ( au?oriz+  
se>*es & electronic surveillance "u !   
,,fisa4  ,on ,m>* #bb1 #bjah1 ,*airman  
,goodlatte issu$ a subpo5a compell+ ,mr4
 ,ros5/e9 & ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,ju/ice to    
produce docum5ts aft] ! ,dep>tm5t fail$ 
to fully comply ) ! ,committee on !     
,judici>y & ! ,committee on ,ov]sight & 
,gov]nm5t ,re=m's docum5t reque/s4 ,9   
reque/+ docum5ts relat$ to alleg$ abuses
 ( ,,fisa relat$ to memb]s ( ! ,trump   
campaign1 ! subpo5a reque/$3  7#a7 ,all 
docum5ts & communications ) ! ,=eign    
,intellig5ce ,surveillance ,c\rt        
7,,fisc7 ref]r+ or relat+ to any ,=eign 
,intellig5ce ,surveillance ,act 7,,fisa7
 applications associat$ ) ,c>t] ,page or
 individuals on ,presid5t ,trump's #bjaf
 ,presid5tial campaign or "p ( ! ,trump 
adm9i/ration4  7#b7 ,all docum5ts &     
communications ref]r+ or relat+ to      
,,fisc he>+s & delib]ations1 includ+ any

 c\rt transcripts1 relat$ to any ,,fisa 
applications associat$ ) ,c>t] ,page or 
! ,trump campaign or ,trump             
adm9i/ration4  7#c7 ,all docum5ts &     
communications ref]r+ or relat+ to      
def5sive brief+s provid$ by ! ,dep>tm5t 
( ,ju/ice or ,,fbi to ! #bjaf           
,presid5tial campaigns ( ,hill>y ,cl9ton
 or ,presid5t ,trump4  7#d7 ,all        
docum5ts & communications ref]r+ or     
relat+ to propos$1 recomm5d$1 or actual 
,,fisa cov]age on ! ,cl9ton ,f\ndation  
or p]sons associat$ or 9 communication )
 ! ,cl9ton ,f\ndation4  ,! ,dep>tm5t (  
,ju/ice has violat$ ?is congressional   
subpo5a by fail+ to fully produce ea* ( 
^! categories ( docum5ts4  ,foll[+ !    
issuance ( ! ,m>* #bb subpo5a1 ,mr4     
,ros5/e9 & ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,ju/ice h      
refus$ to comply ) a                    
,memor&um-(-,und]/&+ negotiat$ ) !      
,committee on ! ,judici>y & ! ,committee
 on ,ov]sight & ,gov]nm5t ,re=m to      
exp$ite ! production ( docum5ts4  ,:]eas
 ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,ju/ice has miss$ docum5t

 production deadl9es1 produc$           
duplicative pages ( in=mation1 & has    
r$act$ pages to ! po9t :]e !y conta9    
little probative in=mation4  ,:]eas     
additional docum5ts provid$ to ,memb]s (
 ,congress 9 ,july #bjah by :i/lebl[]s  
demon/rate "u ,mr4 ,ros5/e9's lead]%ip !
 ,dep>tm5t ( ,ju/ice & ,,fbi h kn[+ly & 
int5tionally )held docum5ts )9 ! scope (
 ! jo9t congressional inve/igation to   
avoid ov]sight4  ,on ,june #bg1 #bjah1  
witness te/imony provid$ 9 a transcrib$ 
int]view ) memb]s ( ! ,committee on !   
,judici>y & ! ,committee on ,ov]sight & 
,gov]nm5t ,re=m reveal$ ! ,dep>tm5t (   
,ju/ice & ,special ,c\nsel ,muell] _h   
in/ruct$ mat]ial fact witnesses to      
refuse to provide te/imony )9 !         
jurisdiction ( ! committees' jo9t       
inve/igation2 ev5 ?\gh mu* ( ?is        
in=mation is n law en=cem5t s5sitive &  
available ?r\gh op5 s\rce m$ia report+4 
,on ,july #ac1 #bjah1 witness te/imony  
provid$ 9 a transcrib$ int]view ) memb]s
 ( ! ,committee on ! ,judici>y & !      

,committee on ,ov]sight & ,gov]nm5t     
,re=m reveal$ ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,ju/ice _h  
fail$ to notify mat]ial fact witnesses (
 repeat$ congressional reque/s = _!     
te/imony4  ,:]e=e1 ,rod ,ros5/e91 by su*
 conduct1 w>rants impea*m5t & trial1 &  
removal f (fice4  ,article ,,iii  ,^u 9 
cam]a review ( docum5ts at ! ,dep>tm5t (
 ,ju/ice1 x 0 reveal$ ! ,dep>tm5t1 "u ! 
sup]vision ( ,mr4 ,ros5/e91 attempt$ to 
conceal c]ta9 facts z docum5ts provid$  
to ,congress 7 heavily & unnecess>ily   
r$act$4 ,mo/ ( ! r$act$ docum5ts conta9+
 mat]ial inve/igative in=mation did n   
conta9 law-en=cem5t-s5sitive in=mation1 
! ,dep>tm5t's /at$ basis = r$actions4   
,! ,dep>tm5t ( ,ju/ice1 "u ! sup]vision 
( ,mr4 ,ros5/e91 unnecess>ily r$act$ !  
price ( ,,fbi ,deputy ,director ,&rew   
,mc,cabe's #gj1jjj conf]5ce table       
because x 0 pot5tially emb>rass+        
in=mation4  ,! ,dep>tm5t ( ,ju/ice1 "u !
 sup]vision ( ,mr4 ,ros5/e91 r$act$     
,,fbi ,ag5t ,pet] ,/rzok's p]sonal      
relation%ip ) ,,fisc ,judge ,rudolph    

,contr]as4  ,! ,dep>tm5t ( ,ju/ice1 "u !
 sup]vision ( ,mr4 ,ros5/e91 r$act$ !   
names ( high-rank+ ,obama adm9i/ration  
(ficials1 su* z =m] ,:ite ,h\se ,*ief ( 
,/aff ,d5is ,mc,donough4  ,! ,dep>tm5t (
 ,ju/ice1 "u ! sup]vision ( ,mr4        
,ros5/e91 r$act$ ! names ( high-rank+   
,,fbi (ficials1 su* z =m] ,deputy       
,director ,&rew ,mc,cabe4  ,! ,dep>tm5t 
( ,ju/ice ackn[l$g$ ! unnecess>y        
r$actions & agre$ t "s in=mation %\ld n 
h be5 r$act$ 9 an ,april #af1 #bjah1    
lett] to ,repres5tatives ,mead[s &      
,jordan4  ,:]e=e1 ,rod ,ros5/e91 by su* 
conduct1 w>rants impea*m5t & trial1 &   
removal f (fice4  ,article ,,iv  ,on    
,may #ag1 #bjag1 ,deputy ,attorney      
,g5]al ,ros5/e9 appo9t$ ,rob]t ,s4      
,muell] ,,iii z ! ,special ,c\nsel to   
inve/igate possible ties betwe5 ! ,trump
 campaign & ,russia4 ,9 ,may #bjag1 ,mr4
 ,ros5/e9 au?or$ ! initial memo         
articulat+ ! scope ( ! ,special ,c\nsel 
inve/igation's jurisdiction4  ,on ,augu/
 #b1 #bjag1 ,mr4 ,ros5/e9 draft$ a memo 

articulat+ ! scope ( ! ,special ,c\nsel 
inve/igation :i* began by not+ ! foll[+ 
allegations 7 )9 ! scope ( !            
inve/igation at ! "t ( y\r appo9tm5t &  
are )9 ! scope ( ! ord]1 ) ne>ly ev]y?+ 
foll[+ ! m5tion ( ^? initial allegations
 r$act$4  ,mr4 ,ros5/e9's memo is a     
classifi$ docum5t & almo/ completely    
r$act$1 rais+ conc]ns ! appo9tm5t (     
,rob]t ,s4 ,muell] ,,iii z ,special     
,c\nsel began outside ! scope (         
regulations = ,special ,c\nsel          
inve/igations by orig9at+ on a          
c\nt]9tellig5ce1 r ?an crim9al1 basis4  
,mr4 ,ros5/e9's memo also raises conc]ns
 giv5 ,special ,c\nsel inve/igations are
 n w>rant$ by ! exi/5ce ( m]e           
allegations1 & require !re be facts     
evid5t w>rant+ a crim9al inve/igation ( 
a p]son or matt]4  ,mr4 ,ros5/e9's memo 
raises fundam5tal conc]ns relat$ to !   
,gov]nm5t's basis = alleg+ collusion    
betwe5 ! ,trump campaign & ,russia1 &   
:e!r ^! allegations result$ 9 pot5tial  
crimes w>rant+ inve/igation4  ,despite !

 significant public int]e/ 9 ! matt] & !
 con/itutional au?ority ( ,congress to  
conduct ov]sight ( ! ,dep>tm5t (        
,ju/ice1 ,mr4 ,ros5/e9 has repeat$ly    
fail$ to provide a less-r$act$ v]sion ( 
?is scope memo1 ev5 9 a classifi$ sett+4
  ,:]e=e1 ,rod ,ros5/e91 by su* conduct1
 w>rants impea*m5t & trial1 & removal f 
(fice4  ,article ,v  ,9 8 capacity z    
,deputy ,attorney ,g5]al ( ! ,unit$     
,/ates1 ,mr4 ,ros5/e9 ov]saw !          
pot5tially improp] au?orization ( ,,fisa
 se>*es & electronic surveillance (     
memb]s ( ! ,trump campaign4  ,z evid5c$ 
by ! ,july #ba1 #bjah1 release ( ! ,c>t]
 ,page ,,fisa application1 "u ,mr4      
,ros5/e9's sup]vision1 ! dossi] compil$ 
by ,*ri/oph] ,/eele on behalf ( !       
,democratic ,national ,committee & !    
,hill>y ,cl9ton campaign =m$ a mat]ial  
"p ( ! ,,fisa application4  ,"u ,mr4    
,ros5/e9's sup]vision1 ! ,dep>tm5t (    
,ju/ice & ,,fbi int5tionally obfuscat$ !
 fact ! dossi] 0 orig9ally a political  
opposition rese>* docum5t be=e ! ,,fisc4

  ,"u ,mr4 ,ros5/e9's sup]vision1       
,*ri/oph] ,/eele's political opposition 
rese>* 0 nei!r vett$ be=e x 0 us$ 9     
,octob] #bjaf nor fully reveal$ to !    
,,fisc1 giv5 ,director ,comey's ,june   
#bjag te/imony ! dossi] 0 salaci\s &    
unv]ifi$4  ,z ,deputy ,attorney ,g5]al1 
,mr4 ,ros5/e9 has fail$ 9 8             
responsibility = ! prop] au?orization ( 
se>*es "u ,,fisa1 & 8 conduct relat$ to 
! surveillance ( ,am]ican citiz5s work+ 
on ! ,trump campaign has p]man5tly      
und]m9$ bo? public & congressional      
confid5ce 9 significant c\nt]9tellig5ce 
program processes4  ,"u ,mr4 ,ros5/e9's 
sup]vision1 ! public's confid5ce 9 !    
integrity ( ! ,,fisa process dep5ds on !
 c\rt's ability to hold ! ,gov]nm5t to !
 highe/-/&>d-p>ticul>ly z x relates to  
surveillance ( ,am]ican citiz5s4  ,giv5 
,mr4 ,ros5/e9's ov]sight ( ! ,,fisa     
process is a c5tral issue 9 ! curr5t    
congressional inve/igation into c]ta9   
decisions made & n made by ! ,dep>tm5t (
 ,ju/ice & ,,fbi 9 #bjaf & #bjag1 he has

 actual & pot5tial conflicts ( int]e/   
requir+ ! appo9tm5t ( a second ,special 
,c\nsel4  ,:]e=e1 ,rod ,ros5/e91 by su* 
conduct1 w>rants impea*m5t & trial1 &   
removal f (fice4