,i #aaeth ,,congress #ast ,session ,h4 ,r4 #gdh ,,in ,,the ,,house ,,of ,,representatives ,january #cj1 #bjag,mr4 ,quigley 7for himself1 ,ms4 ,barragn1 ,mr4 ,payne1 ,mr4 ,blumenauer1 ,ms4 ,judy ,chu of ,california1 ,ms4 ,de,lauro1 ,mr4 ,ellison1 ,mr4 ,espaillat1 ,ms4 ,michelle ,lujan ,grisham of ,new ,mexico1 ,mr4 ,jeffries1 ,mr4 ,larsen of ,washington1 ,mrs4 ,carolyn ,b4 ,maloney of ,new ,york1 ,ms4 ,matsui1 ,ms4 ,mc,collum1 ,mr4 ,mc,govern1 ,mr4 ,meeks1 ,ms4 ,moore1 ,mr4 ,nadler1 ,ms4 ,norton1 ,mr4 ,beyer1 ,mr4 ,raskin1 ,ms4 ,schakowsky1 ,mr4 ,serrano1 ,mr4 ,soto1 ,ms4 ,titus1 ,mr4 ,tonko1 ,mr4 ,vargas1 ,ms4 ,velzquez1 ,mr4 ,gallego1 ,mr4 ,ted ,lieu of ,california1 ,mr4 ,welch1 ,mr4 ,smith of ,washington1 ,mrs4 ,napolitano1 and ,ms4 ,bonamici7 introduced the following bill2 which was referred to the ,committee on the ,judiciary1 and in addition to the ,committee on ,oversight and ,government ,reform1 for a period to be subsequently determined by the ,speaker1 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned ,a ,,bill ,to protect any ,state or local authority that limits or restricts compliance with an immigration detainer request remains eligible for grants and appropriated funds4 #a4 ,short title ,this ,act may be cited as the ,safeguarding ,sanctuary ,cities ,act of #bjag4 #b4 ,findings ,congress finds the following3 7#a7 ,existing ,federal law authorizes any authorized immigration officer to issue an immigration detainer that serves to advise another law enforcement agency that the ,federal department seeks custody of an undocumented immigrant presently in the custody of that agency1 for the purpose of arresting and removing the undocumented immigrant4 7#b7 ,unlike criminal detainers1 which are supported by a warrant and require probable cause1 there is no requirement for a warrant and no established standard of proof1 such as reasonable suspicion or probable cause1 for issuing an ,,ice detainer request4 ,immigration detainers have erroneously been placed on ,united ,states citizens1 as well as immigrants who are not deportable4 7#c7 ,galarza v4 ,szalczyk1 ,u4,s4 ,court of ,appeals for the ,third ,circuit ruled in ,march #bjad that ,states and counties are not required to keep undocumented immigrants in jail on immigration detainers2 and in ,april #bjad1 ,miranda-,olivares v4 ,clackamas ,county1 the ,u4,s4 ,district ,court in ,portland1 ,oregon1 found that county governments would be exposed to civil rights lawsuits for honoring detainers not issued in compliance with ,fourth ,amendment protections1 including a showing of probable cause4 #c4 ,discretion to comply with immigration detainers ,notwithstanding any other provision of law 7including section #fdb of the ,illegal ,immigration ,reform and ,immigrant ,responsibility ,act of #aiif71 if a ,state or unit of local government has in place any policy that limits or restricts compliance with a detainer or otherwise does not comply with a detainer1 ,federal financial assistance 7as such term is defined in section #geja7;a77#e7 of title #ca1 ,united ,states ,code7 that the ,state or unit of local government would otherwise receive may not be reduced or not made available to that ,state or unit of local government by reason of such noncompliance4 #d4 ,definitions ,in this ,act1 the term detainer means any order or request by the ,secretary of ,homeland ,security to a ,state or local official-- 7#a7 to temporarily hold a person in the custody of that ,state or unit of local government until such person may be taken into ,federal custody2 7#b7 to transport such a person for transfer to ,federal custody2 or 7#c7 to notify the ,secretary prior to the release of such a person4