,i #aae? ,,congress #a/ ,session ,h4 ,r4 #bfdi ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,( ,,repres5tatives ,may #bd1 #bjag,mrs4 ,watson ,coleman 7= h]self & ,mr4 ,c>twright7 introduc$ ! foll[+ bill2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee on ,en]gy & ,comm]ce ,a ,,bill ,to require ! ,f$]al ,en]gy ,regulatory ,commission to apply c]ta9 proc$ures be=e grant+ a c]tificate ( public conv5i5ce & necessity = a propos$ pipel9e project1 & = o!r purposes4 #a4 ,%ort title ,?is ,act may be cit$ z ! ,safe & ,acc\ntable ,f$]al ,en]gy ,review = ,pipel9es ,act ( #bjag or ! ,saf] ,pipel9es ,act ( #bjag4 #b4 ,approval ( new natural gas pipel9es ,section #g7;e7 ( ! ,natural ,gas ,act 7#ae ,u4,s4,c4 #gag;f7e77 is am5d$-- 7#a7 by ins]t+ 7#a7 be=e ,except 9 ! cases2 & 7#b7 by add+ at ! end ! foll[+3 7#b7 ,be=e grant+ a c]tificate = a propos$ pipel9e expansion project = :i* an impact$ ,/ate or political subdivision or int]v5] has rais$ a *all5ge to ! project's public necessity bas$ ^u factors t ! ,commission is requir$ to consid] includ+ ,,f]c ,/atem5t ( ,policy 7#hh ,,f]c #fa1bbg7 modifi$ by #hi ,,f]c #fa1jdj1 fur!r cl>ifi$ by #ij ,,f]c #fa1abh1 ! ,commission %all-- 7,a7 assign ! application to an adm9i/rative law judge :o %all1 z appropriate-- 7i7 hold a full trial-type evid5ti>y he>+ on any conte/$ issue ( ne$ = ! expansion2 or 7ii7 conduct = an evid5ti>y he>+ aft] conduct+ limit$ discov]y2 & 7,b7 issue a /aff report publi%+ ! f9d+s ) respect to ea* factor :i* includes ! data & analyses reli$ ^u 9 rea*+ ^? f9d+s4 7#c7 ,! ,commission %all conduct a cumulative review ( major en]gy infra/ructure projects plann$ ?r\gh\t ! region ( ! expansion1 _! purport$ purpose & ne$1 & _! prospective impacts on ,/ate & regional en]gy goals1 :i* %all be updat$ regul>ly1 b no less ?an e five ye>s1 & t consid]s-- 7,a7 ! exi/5ce ( und]utiliz$ or ineffici5t use ( exi/+ pipel9e capacity2 7,b7 ! effect ( approval on exi/+ cu/om]s ( o!r pipel9es2 7,c7 an analysis ( demon/rat$ regional ne$s = ! additional natural gas1 includ+ consid]ation ( ! exi/5ce ( prec$5t contracts2 7,d7 compatibility ) ! ,/ate's clean p[] plan1 r5ewable en]gy goals1 & r5ewable portfolio /&>d2 7,e7 ! region's ability to meet any defici5cy 9 en]gy ne$s ?r\gh en]gy effici5cy1 dual fuel s\rces1 ,,lng /orage1 or o!r economically viable & less environm5tally disruptive measures ?an additional pipel9e infra/ructure2 7,f7 ,f$]al r5ewable en]gy goals2 & 7,g7 ! ne$ = ! propos$ project 9 relation to ?is regional analysis4 7#d7 ,9 ! case ( an int]/ate natural gas pipel9e project1 = purposes ( ! ,national ,environm5tal ,policy ,act ( #aifi 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #dcba et seq471 ! ,commission %all consid]1 9 addition to curr5t requirem5ts = environm5tal impact /atem5ts or environm5tal assessm5ts1 ! cumulative impacts ( o!r int]/ate natural gas pipel9e projects locat$ )9 ! same ,/ate or ,/ates1 z well z projects )9 #ajj miles ( ! project1 t are approv$1 fil$ ) ! ,commission or1 9 ! pre-fil+ process-- 7,a7 = a #a-ye> p]iod prior to ! fil+ ( ! project application ) ! ,commission2 7,b7 be=e ! issuance ( ! draft environm5tal impact /atem5t or environm5tal assessm5t2 & 7,c7 ! cumulative review 9 p>agraph 7#c74 7#e7 ,! ,commission %all require all approv$ & con/ruct$ natural gas pipel9e projects to und]take a five-ye> monitor+ program to confirm t ! environm5tal impacts id5tifi$ 9 any environm5tal impact /atem5t or analysis conduct$ ) respect to ! project h be5 mitigat$4 4