,i  #aae? ,,congress  #a/ ,session  ,h4 
,r4 #acea  ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,(           
,,repres5tatives  ,m>* #b1 #bjag,mr4    
,p]ry 7= himself & ,mr4 ,mc,caul7       
introduc$ ! foll[+ bill2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to
 ! ,committee on ,homel& ,security  ,a  
,,bill  ,to am5d title #di1 ,unit$      
,/ates ,code1 to direct ! ,adm9i/rator (
 ! ,transportation ,security            
,adm9i/ration 7,,tsa7 to make c]ta9     
improvem5ts 9 manag+ ,,tsa's employee   
misconduct1 & = o!r purposes4  #a4 ,%ort
 title ,?is ,act may be cit$ z !        
,/r5g!n+ ,ov]sight ( ,,tsa ,employee    
,misconduct ,act4  #b4 ,,tsa ,misconduct
 ,inspection ,plan  7a7 ,9 g5]al        
,section #ddice ( title #di1 ,unit$     
,/ates ,code1 is am5d$--  7#a7 by       
r$esignat+ ! second subsection 7i7      
7relat+ to accessibility ( comput]-bas$ 
tra9+ facilities7 z subsection 7k72 &   
7#b7 by add+ at ! end ! foll[+ new      
subsection3  7l7 ,,tsa misconduct       
inspections  7#a7 ,9 g5]al ,n lat] ?an  
#fj days aft] ! date ( ! enactm5t ( ?is 

subsection1 ! ,adm9i/rator ( !          
,transportation ,security ,adm9i/ration 
7,,tsa7 %all--  7,a7 designate a s5ior  
(ficial to implem5t a plan to ov]see    
unann\nc$ inspections ( ! types (       
actions tak5 9 response to employee     
misconduct allegations1 includ+ actions 
tak5 by manag]s at airports to address  
any su* allegations ?r\gh corrective    
actions1 includ+ dismissal if w>rant$1 9
 accordance ) ,dep>tm5t ( ,homel&       
,security & ,,tsa policies2  7,b7 on a  
qu>t]ly basis !reaft] until ,septemb]   
#cj1 #bjbb1 ! (ficial specifi$ 9        
subp>agraph 7,a7 %all c]tify to !       
,adm9i/rator t ! unann\nc$ inspections  
ref]r$ to 9 su* p>agraph 7 complet$     
across a suffici5t numb] ( airports su* 
t all airports are inspect$ be=e su*    
date2  7,c7 designate a s5ior (ficial to
 review ! results ( su* unann\nc$       
inspections to id5tify root causes ( any
 v>iances 9 ! way actions tak5 9        
response to employee misconduct         
allegations & develop corrective actions

 7includ+ dismissal if w>rant$71 z      
appropriate2 &  7,d7 ensure t ! (ficial 
specifi$ 9 subp>agraph 7,a7 implem5ts ! 
recomm5dations made by ! (ficial        
specifi$ 9 subp>agraph 7,c74  7#b7      
,dep>tm5t ( ,homel& ,security review    
7,a7 ,9 g5]al ,on a qu>t]ly basis1 !    
(ficial specifi$ 9 p>agraph 7#a77;,a7   
%all provide to ! ,*ief ,human ,capital 
,(fic] ( ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,homel& ,security
 ! results ( unann\nc$ inspections      
conduct$ pursuant to su* p>agraph4  7,b7
 ,id5tification ,! ,*ief ,human ,capital
 ,(fic] ( ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,homel&         
,security %all review ! results ( !     
unann\nc$ inspections conduct$ pursuant 
to p>agraph 7#a77;,a7 to id5tify tr5ds  
&1 z appropriate1 make recomm5dations1  
includ+ timeframes = implem5tation1 to !
 ,adm9i/rator ( ! ,,tsa to address      
employee misconduct4  7,c7              
,implem5tation ,! ,adm9i/rator ( ! ,,tsa
 %all implem5t recomm5dations made by ! 
,*ief ,human ,capital ,(fic] ( !        
,dep>tm5t ( ,homel& ,security )9 !      

timeframes e/abli%$ by ! ,*ief ,human   
,capital ,(fic]4  7#c7 ,in=mation to    
,congress ,! ,adm9i/rator ( ! ,,tsa %all
 make misconduct in=mation id5tifi$ "u  
?is subsection readily available to--   
7,a7 ! ,committee on ,homel& ,security &
 ! ,committee on ,appropriations ( !    
,h\se ( ,repres5tatives2  7,b7 !        
,committee on ,homel& ,security &       
,gov]nm5tal ,affairs1 ! ,committee on   
,comm]ce1 ,sci5ce1 & ,transportation1 & 
! ,committee on ,appropriations ( !     
,s5ate2 &  7,c7 z appropriate1 p]sonnel 
( ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,homel& ,security1 z    
det]m9$ by ! ,adm9i/rator4  7#d7        
,def9itions ,9 ?is subsection3 7,a7     
,actions ,! t]m actions means           
consequ5ces = employee misconduct       
e/abli%$ by ! ,transportation ,security 
,adm9i/ration's misconduct policy &     
relat$ docum5ts "u ?is subsection4  7,b7
 ,misconduct ,! t]m misconduct means !  
failure ( a ,transportation ,security   
,adm9i/ration employee to comply ) a    
p]=mance plan1 rule1 regulation1 or law 

)9 ! scope ( su* employee's duties1     
responsibilities1 or functions4  7,c7   
,unann\nc$ inspections ,! t]m unann\nc$ 
inspections means a review ( in=mation  
)\t provid+ notice to ! p>ty "u review4 
4  7b7 ,no additional funds au?oriz$ ,no
 additional funds are au?oriz$ to c>ry  
out ! requirem5ts ( ?is ,act & !        
am5dm5ts made by ?is ,act4 ,su*         
requirem5ts %all be c>ri$ out us+ am\nts
 o!rwise au?oriz$4