,,iii #aad? ,,congress #b;d ,session ,s4 ,,res4 #eje ,,9 ,,! ,,s5ate ,,( ,,! ,,unit$ ,,/ates ,june #ba1 #bjaf ,mr4 ,cork] 7= himself1 ,mr4 ,c>d91 & ,mr4 ,cotton7 submitt$ ! foll[+ resolution2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee on ,=eign ,relations ,,resolution ,express+ ! s5se ( ! ,s5ate reg>d+ compliance en=cem5t ( ,russian violations ( ! ,op5 ,skies ,treaty4 ,:]eas ! ,treaty on ,op5 ,skies1 done at ,hels9ki ,m>* #bd1 #aiib1 & ent]$ into =ce ,janu>y #a1 #bjjb 79 ?is resolution ref]r$ to z ! ,op5 ,skies ,treaty71 :i* e/abli%$ a regime = un>m$ a]ial obs]vation flights ov] ! entire t]ritory ( its p>ticipants1 is "o ( ! mo/ wide-rang+ int]national ef=ts to date to promote op5ness & transp>5cy ( milit>y =ces & activities2 ,:]eas ! ,unit$ ,/ates ,gov]nm5t has decl>$ t /r5g!n+ & ma9ta9+ ,european security is a top priority = ! ,unit$ ,/ates1 t ! ,op5 ,skies ,treaty is a key elem5t ( ! ,euro-,atlantic security ar*itecture1 & t arms control is a key "p ( t ef=t because robu/ multilat]al conv5tional arms control arrangem5ts contribute to a m /able & secure ,european cont95t2 ,:]eas1 accord+ to ,secret>y ( ,/ate ,james ,bak]1 address+ ! ,op5 ,skies ,conf]5ce 9 #aiij1 ! end ( ! ,cold ,w> gave ! ,op5 ,skies ,treaty new importance z a /abiliz+ factor 9 ,ea/-,we/ relations1 op5ness & transp>5cy 9 milit>y matt]s (f]$ ! mo/ direct pa? to great] pr$ictability & r$uc$ risk ( inadv]t5t w>1 & ,op5 ,skies ,treaty 0 ?us pot5tially ! mo/ ambiti\s measure to build confid5ce ev] und]tak52 ,:]eas1 accord+ to ! ,presid5t's lett] ( submittal = ! ,op5 ,skies ,treaty provid$ to ,congress by ! ,secret>y ( ,/ate on ,augu/ #ab1 #aiib1 x is ! purpose ( ! ,op5 ,skies ,treaty to promote op5ness & transp>5cy ( milit>y =ces & activities & to enhance mutual und]/&+ & confid5ce by giv+ ,/ates ,p>ty a direct role 9 ga!r+ in=mation ab\t milit>y =ces & activities ( conc]n to !m2 ,:]eas1 accord+ to ! ,report on ,adh]5ce to & ,compliance ) ,arms ,control1 ,nonprolif]ation1 & ,dis>mam5t ,agreem5ts & ,commitm5ts publi%$ by ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,/ate on ,april #aa1 #bjaf 79 ?is resolution ref]r$ to z ! #bjaf ,compliance ,report71 ! ,russian ,f$]ation cont9ues n to meet its obligations "u ! ,op5 ,skies ,treaty to all[ effective obs]vation ( its entire t]ritory1 rais+ s]i\s compliance conc]ns2 ,:]eas1 accord+ to ! #bjaf ,compliance ,report1 ,russian conduct giv+ rise to compliance conc]ns has cont9u$ s9ce ! ,op5 ,skies ,treaty ent]$ into =ce 9 #bjjb & wors5$ 9 #bjaj1 #bjad1 & #bjae2 & ,:]eas1 accord+ to ! #bjaf ,compliance ,report1 ongo+ ef=ts by ! ,unit$ ,/ates & o!r ,/ates ,p>ty to ! ,op5 ,skies ,treaty to address ^! conc]ns ?r\gh dialogue ) ! ,russian ,f$]ation h n resolv$ any ( ! compliance conc]ns43 ,n[1 !re=e1 be x ,t x is ! s5se ( ! ,s5ate t-- 7#a7 re/rictions ^u ! ability ( ,op5 ,skies ,treaty aircraft to ov]fly all portions ( ! t]ritory ( a ,/ate ,p>ty imp$e op5ness & transp>5cy ( milit>y =ces & activities & und]m9e mutual und]/&+ & confid5ce1 especially :5 c\pl$ ) an ongo+ refusal to address compliance conc]ns rais$ by o!r ,/ates ,p>ty subject to su* re/rictions2 7#b7 x is ess5tial to ! accompli%m5t ( ! purpose ( ! ,op5 ,skies ,treaty t ,op5 ,skies ,treaty aircraft be able to obs]ve ! entire t]ritory ( a ,/ate ,p>ty 9 a timely & reciprocal mann] z provid$ = "u ! ,op5 ,skies ,treaty2 7#c7 ! ,russian ,f$]ation's re/rictions ^u ! ability ( ,op5 ,skies ,treaty aircraft to ov]fly all portions ( ! t]ritory ( ! ,russian ,f$]ation con/itute violations ( ! ,op5 ,skies ,treaty2 & 7#d7 = s long z ! ,russian ,f$]ation rema9s 9 noncompliance ) ! ,op5 ,skies ,treaty1 ! ,unit$ ,/ates %\ld take su* measures z are necess>y to br+ ab\t ! ,russian ,f$]ation's return to full compliance ) its treaty obligations1 includ+1 z appropriate1 ?r\gh ! imposition ( re/rictions ^u ,russian ov]flights ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates4