,,iii #aadth ,,congress #b;d ,session ,s4 ,,con4 ,,res4 #de ,,in ,,the ,,senate ,,of ,,the ,,united ,,states ,july #aa1 #bjaf,mr4 ,whitehouse 7for himself1 ,mr4 ,markey1 ,mr4 ,schatz1 ,mrs4 ,boxer1 ,mr4 ,merkley1 ,ms4 ,warren1 ,mr4 ,sanders1 and ,mr4 ,franken7 submitted the following concurrent resolution2 which was referred to the ,committee on ,commerce1 ,science1 and ,transportation ,,concurrent ,,resolution ,expressing the sense of ,congress relating to the disapproval of certain activities of certain companies1 trade associations1 foundations1 and organizations4 ,whereas in the case of tobacco companies and allied organizations-- 7#a7 according to peer-reviewed scientific research and ,federal court findings1 tobacco companies knew about the harmful health effects of their products2 and 7#b7 contrary to the scientific findings of the tobacco companies and of others about the danger tobacco poses to human health1 tobacco companies1 directly and through their trade associations1 and foundations-- 7,a7 developed a sophisticated and deceitful campaign that funded think tanks and front groups1 and paid public relations firms to deny1 counter1 and obfuscate peer-reviewed science2 and 7,b7 used that misinformation campaign to mislead the public and cast doubt in order to protect their financial interest2 ,whereas in the case of lead-related manufacturers and allied organizations-- 7#a7 according to peer-reviewed scientific research and ,state court findings1 the paint industry1 gasoline manufacturers1 and lead producers knew about the harmful health effects of lead in paint and other products throughout the #bjth century2 and 7#b7 contrary to the scientific findings of the paint industry1 gasoline manufacturers1 lead producers1 and others about the danger lead poses to human health1 those companies1 directly and through their trade associations1 and foundations-- 7,a7 developed a sophisticated and deceitful campaign that funded think tanks and front groups1 and paid public relations firms to deny1 counter1 and obfuscate peer-reviewed research2 and 7,b7 used that misinformation campaign to mislead the public and cast doubt in order to protect their financial interest2 and ,whereas in the case of fossil fuel companies and allied organizations-- 7#a7 according to peer-reviewed scientific research and investigative reporting1 fossil fuel companies have long known about climate change and the harmful climate effects of their products2 and 7#b7 contrary to the scientific findings of the fossil fuel companies and of others about the danger fossil fuels pose to the climate1 fossil fuel companies1 directly and through their trade associations1 and foundations-- 7,a7 developed a sophisticated and deceitful campaign that funded think tanks and front groups1 and paid public relations firms to deny1 counter1 and obfuscate peer-reviewed research2 and 7,b7 used that misinformation campaign to mislead the public and cast doubt in order to protect their financial interest3 ,now1 therefore1 be it ,that ,congress-- 7#a7 disapproves of activities by certain corporations1 trade associations1 foundations1 and organizations funded by those corporations-- 7,a7 to deliberately mislead the public and undermine peer-reviewed scientific research about the dangers of their products2 and 7,b7 to deliberately cast doubt on science in order to protect their financial interests2 and 7#b7 urges fossil fuel companies and allied organizations to cooperate with active or future investigations into-- 7,a7 their climate-change related activities2 7,b7 what they knew about climate change and when they knew that information2 7,c7 what they knew about the harmful effects of fossil fuels on the climate2 and 7,d7 any activities to mislead the public about climate change4