,,iii #aadth ,,congress #b;d ,session ,s4 ,,con4 ,,res4 #dj ,,in ,,the ,,senate ,,of ,,the ,,united ,,states ,may #bd1 #bjaf,mr4 ,gardner submitted the following concurrent resolution2 which was referred to the ,committee on ,finance ,,concurrent ,,resolution ,expressing the sense of ,congress that the ,federal excise tax on heavy-duty trucks should not be increased4 ,whereas there is a #ab-percent ,federal excise tax on new tractor trailer trucks and certain other heavy-duty trucks2 ,whereas the #ab-percent ,federal excise tax is the highest percentage rate of any ,federal ad valorem excise tax2 ,whereas the ,federal excise tax was first levied by ,congress in #aiag to help finance the involvement of the ,united ,states in ,world ,war ,i2 ,whereas1 in #bjae1 the average manufacturer suggested retail price for a heavy-duty truck was more than #agh1jjj2 ,whereas the #ab-percent ,federal excise tax adds1 on average1 an additional #ba1cfj to the cost of a heavy-duty truck2 ,whereas the average in-use1 heavy-duty truck is #i4c years old1 close to the historical all-time high2 ,whereas the ,federal excise tax1 by significantly increasing the cost of new heavy-duty trucks1 keeps older1 less environmentally clean1 and less fuel efficient heavy-duty trucks in service for longer periods of time2 ,whereas the model year #bjjb-bjaj tailpipe emissions rules of the ,environmental ,protection ,agency 7in this preamble referred to as the ,,epa7 account for #bj1jjj of the average price of a new heavy-duty truck2 ,whereas1 according to the #bjaa ,,epa and ,national ,highway ,traffic ,safety ,administration ,regulatory ,impact ,analysis entitled ,final ,rulemaking to ,establish ,greenhouse ,gas ,emissions ,standards and ,fuel ,efficiency ,standards for ,medium- and ,heavy-,duty ,engines and ,vehicles1 model year #bjad-bjah ,,epa-,department of ,transportation fuel economy rules will add approximately #h1jjj to the price of a new heavy-duty truck2 ,whereas the #bh1jjj average per truck cost of these regulatory mandates results1 on average1 in an additional #c1cfj in ,federal excise taxes2 ,whereas achieving the goal of deploying cleaner1 more fuel efficient heavy-duty trucks1 given the #cj1jjj average per truck regulatory cost1 would be slowed even further if the ,federal excise tax were increased2 ,whereas achieving the goal of deploying heavy-duty trucks with the latest safety technologies1 such as lane departure warning systems1 electronic stability control1 and automatic braking for reduced stopping distance1 would be slowed if the ,federal excise tax were increased2 ,whereas all of the heavy-duty trucks sold in the ,united ,states are manufactured in ,north ,america2 and ,whereas more than #h1jjj1jjj people in the ,united ,states are employed in the ,united ,states trucking industry3 ,now1 therefore1 be it ,that-- 7#a7 the ,federal excise tax under section #djea of the ,internal ,revenue ,code of #aihf on new tractor trailer trucks and certain other heavy-duty trucks inhibits the sale of the cleanest1 safest1 and most fuel efficient heavy-duty trucks and trailers2 7#b7 the ,federal excise tax on new tractor trailer trucks and certain other heavy-duty trucks adds uncertainty and volatility to the ,highway ,trust ,fund due to the cyclical nature of heavy-duty truck and trailer sales2 7#c7 the ,federal excise tax on new truck tractors1 heavy-duty trucks1 and certain truck trailers should not be increased2 and 7#d7 ,congress should carefully review the detrimental impacts of the ,federal excise tax when considering future transportation policy4