,,iv #aad? ,,congress #a/ ,session ,h4 ,,res4 #daj ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,( ,,repres5tatives ,septemb] #h1 #bjae ,mr4 ,gohm]t 7= himself1 ,mr4 ,duncan ( ,s\? ,c>ol9a1 ,mr4 ,mc,clintock1 ,mr4 ,k+ ( ,i[a1 ,mr4 ,bab91 ,mr4 ,yoho1 & ,mr4 ,brat7 submitt$ ! foll[+ resolution2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee on ,=eign ,affairs ,,resolution ,express+ ! s5se ( ! ,h\se ( ,repres5tatives t ! ,iran ,nucle> ,agreem5t ,review ,act ( #bjae does n apply to ! ,jo9t ,compreh5sive ,plan ( ,action reg>d+ ,iran & submitt$ to ,congress on ,july #ai1 #bjae1 because ! ,jo9t ,compreh5sive ,plan ( ,action is a treaty &1 pursuant to ,article ,,ii ( ! ,u4,s4 ,con/itution1 ! ,s5ate mu/ give its advice & cons5t to ratification if ! ,jo9t ,compreh5sive ,plan ( ,action is to be effective & b9d+ ^u ! ,unit$ ,/ates4 ,:]eas1 on ,m>* #aa1 #bjae1 ,secret>y ( ,/ate ,john ,k]ry1 9 describ+ ! ,adm9i/ration's nucle> negotiations ) ,iran1 cle>ly /at$ t x 0 n negotiat+ a legally b9d+ plan ) ,iran & !re=e x does n h to be submitt$ to ,congress2 ,:]eas1 on ,augu/ #f1 #bjae1 ,:ite ,h\se ,press ,secret>y ,jo% ,e>ne/1 at a ,:ite ,h\se ,press ,brief+1 /at$ t we don't ne$ ,congress to approve ?is ,iran nucle> deal2 ,:]eas1 on ,july #bh1 #bjae1 ,secret>y ,k]ry1 at a he>+ be=e ! ,h\se ,committee on ,=eign ,affairs1 /at$ t ! reason :y ! ,iran nucle> agreem5t is n consid]$ a treaty is because x's become physically impossible 4 4 4 to pass a treaty ?r\gh ! ,unit$ ,/ates ,s5ate anymore4 4 4 4 ,it's become impossible to 4 4 4 s*$ule4 ,x's become impossible to pass42 ,:]eas two days aft] ,secret>y ,k]ry te/ifi$ t x has become physically impossible = ! ,s5ate to ratify treaties1 ! ,unit$ ,/ates =mally ratifi$ ! ,am5dm5t to ! ,conv5tion on ! ,physical ,protection ( ,nucle> ,mat]ial :5 ,h5ry ,s4 ,en%]1 ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,/ate's ambassador to ! ,int]national ,atomic ,en]gy ,ag5cy 7,,iaea71 deliv]$ ! ,unit$ ,/ates in/rum5t ( ratification to ! ,,iaea2 ,:]eas1 on ,june #d1 #bjae1 less ?an two mon?s be=e ,secret>y ,k]ry te/ifi$ t x has become physically impossible = ! ,s5ate to ratify treaties1 he /at$ t ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,/ate is prep>+ ! in/rum5ts ( ratification ( sev]al important treaties & t he wants to p]sonally ?ank ! ,u4,s4 ,congress 4 4 4 = _! ef=ts on ! implem5t+ legislation = ! nucle> security treaties2 ,:]eas1 on ,may #g1 #bjae1 ! ,s5ate held a vote on ! ,iran ,nucle> ,agreem5t ,review ,act ( #bjae1 commonly ref]r$ to z ! ,cork]-,c>d9 bill1 9 :i* e ,s5ator vot$ on t bill ) ! und]/&+ t ! ,iran nucle> agreem5t 0 an executive agreem5t1 & n a treaty1 & t ,unit$ ,/ates sanctions on ,iran's balli/ic missile program rema9 9 place2 ,:]eas ! ,cork]-,c>d9 bill /ates t it is ! s5se ( ,congress t 4 4 4 ,unit$ ,/ates sanctions on ,iran = 4 4 4 balli/ic missiles w rema9 9 place "u an agreem5t relat$ to ! nucle> program ( ,iran t includes ! ,unit$ ,/ates2 ,:]eas ! ,cork]-,c>d9 bill 0 int5d$ z a review ( ! application ( /atutory sanctions aga9/ only ,iran's nucle> program2 ,:]eas ! ,cork]-,c>d9 bill prescribes a process = congressional review only ( ,agreem5ts ) ,iran ,relat$ to ! ,nucle> ,program ( ,iran2 ,:]eas "u subsections 7b7 & 7c7 ( section #ace ( ! ,atomic ,en]gy ,act ( #aied1 z add$ by ! ,cork]-,c>d9 bill1 lawmak]s may resolve to approve1 disapprove1 or take no action on ,nucle> ,agreem5ts ) ,iran2 ,:]eas section #ace7;d7 ( ! ,atomic ,en]gy ,act ( #aied1 z add$ by ! ,cork]-,c>d9 bill1 calls = ,congressional ,ov]sight ( ,iranian ,compliance ) ,nucle> ,agreem5ts2 ,:]eas1 on ,july #ad1 #bjae1 ! ,adm9i/ration f9aliz$ ! ,iran nucle> agreem5t & ref]r$ to x z ! ,jo9t ,compreh5sive ,plan ( ,action 7,,jcpoa72 ,:]eas1 on ,july #ai1 #bjae1 ! ,adm9i/ration submitt$ ! ,,jcpoa to ,congress2 ,:]eas ! ,,jcpoa is n limit$ to sanctions enact$ by ,congress relat$ to only ,iran's nucle> program2 ,:]eas ! ,,jcpoa ext5ds to ,iran's balli/ic missiles programs & o!r weapons activities--includ+ ! lift+ ( int]national arms emb>goes cov]+ bo? any mat]ial or te*nology t might be useful to a balli/ic-missile program1 & battle tanks1 armor$ combat vehicles1 l>ge calib] artill]y sy/ems1 combat aircraft1 attack helicopt]s1 w>%ips1 missiles1 or missile sy/ems2 ,:]eas ,congress 0 in=m$ only aft] ! ,,jcpoa 0 submitt$ to ,congress t x remov$ int]national re/rictions on ,iran's balli/ic missiles program & conv5tional arms2 ,:]eas because ! t]ms ( ! ,iran nucle> negotiations *ang$ aft] ,congress vot$ on ! ,cork]-,c>d9 bill1 ! bill does n p]mit ,congress to review or approve agreem5ts on balli/ic missiles & o!r weapons2 ,:]eas until ,july #bb1 #bjae1 m ?an a week aft] ! ,iran nucle> agreem5t 0 f9aliz$1 ,secret>y ,k]ry fail$ to in=m ,congress ( ! exi/5ce ( side deals to nucle> agreem5t betwe5 ! ,,iaea & ,iran2 ,:]eas rec5t news reports indicate ! ,,iaea has a secret agreem5t :i* w\ld all[ ,iran to use its own exp]ts to inspect a site alleg$ly us$ to develop nucle> arms1 directly contradict+ ! int5d$ effect ( ! ,cork]-,c>d9 bill by bypass+ congressional ov]sight2 ,:]eas ! ,adm9i/ration fail$ to foll[ ! ,cork]-,c>d9 bill :i* requir$ x to provide ,congress ) all nucle> agreem5t docum5ts1 includ+ all annexes1 app5dices1 codicils1 side agreem5ts1 implem5t+ mat]ials1 docum5ts1 & guidance1 te*nical or o!r und]/&+s & any relat$ agreem5ts1 :e!r ent]$ into or implem5t$ prior to ! agreem5t or to be ent]$ into or implem5t$ 9 ! future2 ,:]eas ! ,adm9i/ration fail$ to comply ) ! ,cork]-,c>d9 bill by n transmitt+ ! nucle> agreem5t1 includ+ all mat]ials1 to ,congress by ,septemb] #g1 #bjae2 ,:]eas ! ,,jcpoa grants ,iran's ,quds ,=ce comm&] ,qasem ,soleimani1 ,def5se ,m9i/] ,mo/afa ,mohammad ,najj>1 :o tra9$ & comm&$ ,hezbollah fight]s 9 ,lebanon at ! "t ( ! ,beirut b>racks bomb+1 & ,hosse9 ,salami1 ! curr5t second-9-comm& ( ! ,iranian ,islamic ,revolution>y ,gu>d ,corps1 individual relief f int]national sanctions2 ,:]eas ! ,,jcpoa am5ds ,article ,i ( ! ,treaty on ! ,non-,prolif]ation ( ,nucle> ,weapons 7commonly ref]r$ to z ! ,nucle> ,non-,prolif]ation ,treaty or ,,npt7 to :i* ! ,unit$ ,/ates is a signatory1 & "u :i* ! ,unit$ ,/ates is obligat$ n 9 any way to assi/1 enc\rage1 or induce 4 4 4 ,iran to acquire nucle> weapons or o!r nucle> explosive devices1 or control ov] su* weapons or explosive devices2 ,:]eas ! ,,jcpoa am5ds ,article ,,ii ( ! ,,npt "u :i* ,iran is responsible n to acquire1 directly or indirectly1 nucle> weapons or capabilities ( controll+ nucle> weapons2 ,:]eas ! ,,jcpoa & ! v>i\s secret side agreem5ts to ! ,,jcpoa am5d ,article ,,iii ( ! ,,npt reg>d+ int]national inspectors 9 ,iran :o %all h access at all times to all places & data & to any p]son :o by reason ( 8 occupation deals ) mat]ials1 equipm5t1 or facilities :i* are requir$ by ?is ,/atute to be safegu>d$2 ,:]eas ! ,,jcpoa am5ds ! ,,npt outside ( ! prescrib$ me?od ( am5dm5t 9 ,article ,,viii ( ! ,,npt2 ,:]eas1 on ,july #ca1 #bjae1 ! non-p>tisan ,congressional ,rese>* ,s]vice releas$ a /udy e/abli%+ t ,iran's def5se budget ranges any:]e f #ad to #cj billion a ye>1 ) mu* ( t money go+ to fund t]rori/ proxy gr\ps & rebel fight]s across ! ,middle ,ea/1 includ+ 9 ,yem51 ,syria1 ,lebanon1 & ! ,gaza ,/rip2 ,:]eas x is evid5t t ! ,,jcpoa is fundam5tally diff]5t f ! int]national agreem5t describ$ by ! ,adm9i/ration :5 ,congress pass$ ! ,cork]-,c>d9 bill2 ,:]eas x is evid5t t ! ,cork]-,c>d9 bill does n rea* _m ( ! p>ts ( ! f9aliz$ nucle> agreem5t ) ,iran1 & t ! ,,jcpoa ?or\ghly m>g9aliz$ ! ,cork]-,c>d9 bill2 ,:]eas ! ,cork]-,c>d9 bill is design$ to address an int]national agreem5t t is fundam5tally diff]5t f ! ,,jcpoa & n a treaty2 & ,:]eas x is n[ evid5t ! ,,jcpoa is ( suffici5t magnitude t x rises to ! level ( a treaty3 ,n[1 !re=e1 be x ,t-- 7#a7 ! ,iran ,nucle> ,agreem5t ,review ,act ( #bjae1 commonly ref]r$ to z ! ,cork]-,c>d9 bill1 does n apply to ! ,jo9t ,compreh5sive ,plan ( ,action 7,,jcpoa7 reg>d+ ,iran because ! ,,jcpoa is fundam5tally diff]5t f ! agreem5t z repres5t$ to ,congress by ! ,adm9i/ration & t ! ,cork]-,c>d9 bill is only applicable to an agreem5t t is n a treaty2 7#b7 ,article ,,ii ( ! ,u4,s4 ,con/itution decl>es t ! ,presid5t %all h ,p[]1 by & ) ! ,advice & ,cons5t ( ! ,s5ate1 to make ,treaties1 b only if two ?irds ( ! ,s5ators pres5t concur2 7#c7 ! ,,jcpoa is a treaty &1 pursuant to ,article ,,ii ( ! ,u4,s4 ,con/itution1 ! ,s5ate mu/ give its advice & cons5t to ratification if ! ,,jcpoa is to be effective & b9d+ ^u ! ,unit$ ,/ates2 & 7#d7 n lat] ?an #cj days aft] ! date ( ! adoption ( ?is resolution1 ! ,s5ate %\ld s*$ule & consid] a resolution ( ratification ) respect to ! ,,jcpoa4