,,iv  #aad? ,,congress  #a/ ,session    
,h4 ,,res4 #ba  ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,(      
,,repres5tatives  ,janu>y #g1 #bjae ,mr4
 ,rice ( ,s\? ,c>ol9a 7= himself1 ,mr4  
,web] ( ,texas1 & ,mr4 ,lance7 submitt$ 
! foll[+ resolution2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to !  
,committee on ,rules1 & 9 addition to ! 
,committee on ,h\se ,adm9i/ration1 = a  
p]iod to be subsequ5tly det]m9$ by !    
,speak]1 9 ea* case = consid]ation ( su*
 provisions z fall )9 ! jurisdiction ( !
 committee conc]n$  ,,resolution        
,direct+ ! ,h\se ( ,repres5tatives to   
br+ a civil action = decl>atory or      
injunctive relief to *all5ge c]ta9      
policies & actions tak5 by ! executive  
bran* relat+ to immigration4  ,:]eas    
,presid5t ,obama & (ficials 9 8         
adm9i/ration h frequ5tly ov]/epp$ !     
limits plac$ on executive bran* p[] by !
 ,con/itution2 ,:]eas ,presid5t ,obama  
/at$ he did n h ! legal au?ority to take
 executive actions on immigration t he  
has n[ subsequ5tly tak52 ,:]eas because 
( ,presid5t ,obama's cont9u+ failure to 

fai?fully execute ! laws1 8             
adm9i/ration's actions _c be address$ by
 ! enactm5t ( new laws1 because         
,congress _c assume t ! ,presid5t w     
execute ! new laws any m fai?fully ?an !
 laws he has already ignor$1 leav+      
,congress ) no legislative rem$y to     
prev5t ! e/abli%m5t ( :at is 9 effect an
 imp]ial presid5cy2 & ,:]eas x is !re=e 
necess>y & appropriate = ,congress to   
turn to ! c\rts to ensure ! fai?ful     
execution ( ! laws z requir$ by !       
,con/itution3 ,n[1 !re=e1 be x  #a4     
,%ort title ,?is resolution may be cit$ 
z ! ,uphold ! ,oa? ,am]icans ,tru/ &    
,honor 7,,oa?7 ,resolution4  #b4        
,direct+ civil action by ,h\se (        
,repres5tatives 9 response to c]ta9     
executive bran* actions relat+ to       
immigration  7a7 ,civil ,action ,! ,h\se
 ( ,repres5tatives %all br+ a civil     
action 9 ! ,unit$ ,/ates ,di/rict ,c\rt 
= ! ,di/rict ( ,columbia = decl>atory or
 injunctive relief to *all5ge any ( !   
foll[+ policies or actions3  7#a7 ,!    

policy ( ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,homel& ,security
 to ex]cise prosecutorial discretion )  
respect to individuals :o came to !     
,unit$ ,/ates z *ildr51 z ann\nc$ by !  
,dep>tm5t ( ,homel& ,security on ,june  
#ae1 #bjab4  7#b7 ,! policy ( !         
,dep>tm5t ( ,homel& ,security to ex]cise
 fur!r prosecutorial discretion )       
respect to c]ta9 o!r unlawfully pres5t  
ali5s1 z direct$ 9 a ,novemb] #bj1      
#bjad1 memor&um issu$ by ,secret>y (    
,homel& ,security ,jeh ,*>les ,johnson1 
& relat$ memor&a issu$ by ! executive   
bran*4  7b7 ,no ,additional ,funds      
,provid$ ,to ,br+ ,actions ,any am\nts  
obligat$ or exp5d$ by ! ,h\se (         
,repres5tatives to c>ry out ?is         
resolution dur+ a fiscal ye> %all be    
d]iv$ f exi/+ appropriations = sal>ies &
 exp5ses ( ! ,h\se = t fiscal ye>1 &    
no?+ 9 ?is resolution may be con/ru$ z  
au?oriz+ an increase 9 ! am\nt ( budget 
au?ority available to ! ,h\se = t fiscal
 ye>4  7c7 ,no ,effect on ,exi/+        
,au?ority ( ,speak] ,no?+ 9 ?is         

resolution may be con/ru$ to affect !   
au?ority ( ! ,speak] to initiate any    
civil action on behalf ( ! ,h\se (      
,repres5tatives1 or to int]v5e 9 any    
civil action on behalf ( ! ,h\se (      
,repres5tatives1 pursuant to ,h\se      
,resolution #fgf1 ,"o ,hundr$ ,?irte5?  
,congress4