#aad? ,,congress  #b;d ,session  ,h4 ,r4
 #efcf  ,,an ,,act  ,to increase !      
effectiv5ess ( & acc\ntability = ma9ta9+
 ! physical security ( ,,ni/ facilities 
& ! safety ( ! ,,ni/ work=ce4  #a4 ,%ort
 title ,?is ,act may be cit$ z !        
,national ,in/itute ( ,/&>ds &          
,te*nology ,campus ,security ,act4  #b4 
,,ni/ campus security  7a7 ,sup]visory  
au?ority ,! ,dep>tm5t ( ,comm]ce ,(fice 
( ,security %all directly manage ! law  
en=cem5t & security programs ( !        
,national ,in/itute ( ,/&>ds &          
,te*nology ?r\gh an assign$ ,director ( 
,security = ! ,national ,in/itute (     
,/&>ds & ,te*nology4 ,?is subsection    
%all be c>ri$ out )\t increas+ ! numb] (
 full "t equival5t employees ( !        
,dep>tm5t ( ,comm]ce1 includ+ !         
,national ,in/itute ( ,/&>ds &          
,te*nology4  7b7 ,reports ,su* ,director
 ( ,security %all provide an activities 
& security report on a qu>t]ly basis = !
 fir/ ye> aft] ! date ( enactm5t ( ?is  
,act1 & on an annual basis !reaft]1 to !

 ,"u ,secret>y = ,/&>ds & ,te*nology &  
to ! ,committee on ,sci5ce1 ,space1 &   
,te*nology ( ! ,h\se ( ,repres5tatives &
 ! ,committee on ,comm]ce1 ,sci5ce1 &   
,transportation ( ! ,s5ate4  7c7        
,comptroll] ,g5]al report ,n lat] ?an #a
 ye> aft] ! date ( enactm5t ( ?is ,act1 
! ,comptroll] ,g5]al %all submit a      
report to ! ,secret>y ( ,comm]ce1 & to !
 ,committee on ,sci5ce1 ,space1 &       
,te*nology ( ! ,h\se ( ,repres5tatives &
 ! ,committee on ,comm]ce1 ,sci5ce1 &   
,transportation 9 ! ,s5ate1 t--  7#a7   
evaluates ! co/s & p]=mance ( !         
,national ,in/itute ( ,/&>ds &          
,te*nology ,police ,s]vices ,gr\p2  7#b7
 comp>es ! total co/s ( t ,police       
,s]vices ,gr\p ) ! e/imat$ co/ ( private
 police contractors to p]=m ! same "w2  
7#c7 exam9es any pot5tial conc]ns )     
private police contractors p]=m+ !      
duties ( ! ,police ,s]vices ,gr\p2  7#d7
 makes recomm5dations1 bas$ on ! f9d+s  
"u p>agraphs 7#b7 & 7#c71 = h[ !        
,national ,in/itute ( ,/&>ds &          

,te*nology %\ld sp5d its money on       
security )\t dim9i%+ ! security on its  
campuses2  7#e7 proposes ov]sight &     
direction t ! ,police ,s]vices ,gr\p or 
outside security contractors ne$ to     
ensure physical security at ,national   
,in/itute ( ,/&>ds & ,te*nology         
campuses2  7#f7 e/abli%es ! p]c5tage (  
,national ,in/itute ( ,/&>ds &          
,te*nology p]sonnel1 includ+ ! ,police  
,s]vices ,gr\p & outside security       
contractors1 t foll[ security policies1 
processes1 & proc$ures applicable to _! 
responsibilities2  7#g7 det]m9es ! numb]
 ( kn[n security brea*es & o!r simil>   
incid5ts at ,national ,in/itute ( ,/&>ds
 & ,te*nology campuses involv+ ,national
 ,in/itute ( ,/&>ds & ,te*nology        
p]sonnel & ext]nal p>ties f fiscal ye>  
#bjab to ! date ( ! completion ( ?is    
report1 & _! impact & resolution2 &     
7#h7 analyzes managem5t1 op]ational1 &  
o!r *all5ges enc\nt]$ 9 ! c\rse (       
protect+ ,national ,in/itute ( ,/&>ds & 
,te*nology facilities & ! ext5t to :i*  

su* *all5ges impact security1 & includes
 assessm5t ( ! ,national ,in/itute (    
,/&>ds & ,te*nology's attempts to       
mitigate ^? *all5ges4  ,pass$ ! ,h\se ( 
,repres5tatives ,july #aa1 #bjaf4;,cl]k4