,,iv #aad? ,,congress #a/ ,session ,h4 ,,con4 ,,res4 #hj ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,( ,,repres5tatives ,septemb] #cj1 #bjae ,ms4 ,adams 7= h]self1 ,ms4 ,fudge1 ,ms4 ,mi*elle ,lujan ,gri%am ( ,new ,mexico1 ,ms4 ,jackson ,lee1 ,ms4 ,norton1 ,mr4 ,ryan ( ,ohio1 ,mr4 ,nadl]1 & ,mr4 ,mc,govern7 submitt$ ! foll[+ concurr5t resolution2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee on ,education & ! ,work=ce1 & 9 addition to ! ,committees on ,agriculture & ,ways & ,means1 = a p]iod to be subsequ5tly det]m9$ by ! ,speak]1 9 ea* case = consid]ation ( su* provisions z fall )9 ! jurisdiction ( ! committee conc]n$ ,,concurr5t ,,resolution ,express+ ! s5se ( ! ,congress on ,hung] 9 our ,communities4 ,:]eas1 accord+ to ! ,unit$ ,/ates ,dep>tm5t ( ,agriculture1 nationally #ad p]c5t ( h\seholds report$ be+ food insecure1 :i* equates to #a 9 #g h\seholds /ruggl+ to put safe & nutriti\s food on ! table2 ,:]eas1 accord+ to ! ,unit$ ,/ates ,dep>tm5t ( ,agriculture1 ! ,/ates ( ,mississippi1 ,l\isiana1 ,we/ ,virg9ia1 ,t5nessee1 ,k5tucky1 ,alabama1 ,arkansas1 ,montana1 ,ma9e1 ,nor? ,c>ol9a1 ,ohio1 ,oklahoma1 & ,texas h food insecurity rates ov] #af p]c5t2 ,:]eas1 accord+ to ,fe$+ ,am]ica1 #ba4d p]c5t ( *ildr5 9 ! ,unit$ ,/ates did n h suffici5t access to food at "s po9t dur+ ! previ\s ye>2 ,:]eas _m families simply d n h adequate res\rces 7f wages1 ,social ,security & o!r retirem5t b5efits1 income supports1 ! supplem5tal nutrition assi/ance program 7,,snap71 & ! special supplem5tal nutrition program = wom51 infants1 & *ildr5 7,,wic77 to pur*ase en\gh food2 ,:]eas income support programs su* z ,tempor>y ,assi/ance = ,ne$y ,families 7,,tanf71 ,unemploym5t ,insurance1 & ,work]'s ,comp5sation are inadequate & increas+ly difficult to apply = & ma9ta9 b5efits2 ,:]eas1 :ile ! supplem5tal nutrition assi/ance program 7,,snap7 is critical 9 provid+ nutrition assi/ance to bo? work+ & non-work+ h\seholds by supplem5t+ wages1 ,social ,security b5efits1 or o!r s\rces ( income1 ,,snap b5efits j are n en\gh = mo/ families to make x ?r\gh ! mon?2 ,:]eas #a ( ! factors contribut+ to food h>d%ip is an individual liv+ too f> away f a groc]y /ore or an af=dable heal?y-food retail outlet2 ,:]eas community bas$ organizations su* z food banks & o!r nonpr(it organizations h to op]ate ! ,*ild & ,adult ,c>e ,food ,program 7,,cacfp7 aft] s*ool & ! ,summ] ,food ,s]vice ,program 7,,sfsp7 dur+ ! summ]1 ev5 ?\gh !y are s]v+ ! same kids1 (t5 at ! same sites1 !reby compell+ community-bas$ organizations to use a duplicative adm9i/rative process to receive fund+ = bo? programs to s]ve ! same gr\p ( *ildr51 increas+ adm9i/rative co/s on organizations ) already limit$ res\rces2 ,:]eas _m l[-income *ildr5 /ruggle ) hung] ov] ! summ]1 b communities h limit$ ability to support !m because ( rigid program requirem5ts t require kids to consume meals on-site2 & ,:]eas food h>d%ip rates are too high across ! ,nation3 ,n[1 !re=e1 be x ,t-- 7#a7 ! ,congress %\ld increase support = programs t w /r5g!n wages & move ! ,nation t[>d full employm5t1 includ+ 9 und]s]v$ areas2 7#b7 ,congressional fund+ = programs su* z ,unemploym5t ,insurance1 ,tempor>y ,assi/ance = ,ne$y ,families 7,,tanf71 refundable tax cr$its1 & ! supplem5tal nutrition assi/ance program 7,,snap71 %\ld be increas$2 7#c7 ! ,congress %\ld appropriate funds = ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,agriculture to op]ate & manage programs t are au?oriz$ z "p ( ! ,heal?y ,food ,f9anc+ ,initiative "u ,public ,law #aac-gi1 ! ,agricultural ,act ( #bjad2 7#d7 ! ,congress %\ld p]mit nonpr(it organizations t s]ve *ildr5 ?r\gh ! ,*ild & ,adult ,c>e ,food ,program & ! ,summ] ,food ,s]vice ,program to op]ate #a program ye>-r\nd1 elim9at+ duplicative adm9i/rative processes & align+ inconsi/5t program requirem5ts2 & 7#e7 ! on-site requirem5t = aft]-s*ool & summ] meals programs %\ld be waiv$ to all[ communities to develop m effective ways to s]ve *ildr5 outside ( ! s*ool day1 includ+ by exp&+ curr5t ,unit$ ,/ates ,dep>tm5t ( ,agriculture programs su* z ! ,summ] ,electronic ,b5efits ,transf] = ,*ildr5 demon/ration4