,,iii #aacth ,,congress #ast ,session ,s4 ,,res4 #cbc ,,in ,,the ,,senate ,,of ,,the ,,united ,,states ,december #ah1 #bjac,mr4 ,chambliss 7for himself1 ,mr4 ,isakson1 ,ms4 ,murkowski1 ,mr4 ,mc,cain1 ,mr4 ,hoeven1 ,mr4 ,johnson of ,wisconsin1 ,ms4 ,collins1 ,mr4 ,blunt1 and ,mr4 ,portman7 submitted the following resolution2 which was referred to the ,committee on ,armed ,services ,,resolution ,expressing the sense of the ,senate on maintaining the current annual adjustment in retired pay for members of the ,armed ,forces under the age of #fb4 ,whereas it is the responsibility of ,congress to get the fiscal house of government in order1 and all government spending should be examined to achieve that goal2 ,whereas ,h4,j4 ,res4 #ei 7#aacth ,congress71 a bipartisan budget proposal1 is a first step in this direction1 though it fails to address broader government spending issues2 ,whereas retirees from the ,armed ,forces1 both those who served a full career and those medically retired and their survivors1 have provided great service and sacrificed much for our country2 ,whereas ,h4,j4 ,res4 #ei 7#aacth ,congress7 disproportionally targets these military retirees in the name of fiscal responsibility2 and ,whereas1 while the decisions regarding future spending cuts may be difficult and painful1 the solution should require contributions from all ,americans3 ,now1 therefore1 be it ,that it is the sense of the ,senate that-- 7#a7 retirees from the ,armed ,forces should not unfairly bear the burden of excessive government spending2 7#b7 military retirees earned the benefits they were promised upon entering the military1 and it is the duty of the ,senate to protect them2 and 7#c7 the ,senate should seek alternatives to the provisions of section #djc of the ,bipartisan ,budget ,act of #bjac 7introduced as ,h4,j4 ,res4 #ei 7#aacth ,congress77 before the effective date of that section and the amendments made by that section4