,,iii #aacth ,,congress #ast ,session ,s4 ,,res4 #acc ,,in ,,the ,,senate ,,of ,,the ,,united ,,states ,may #h1 #bjac ,mr4 ,lee 7for himself1 ,mr4 ,toomey1 ,mr4 ,rubio1 ,mr4 ,scott1 ,mr4 ,cruz1 ,mr4 ,inhofe1 ,mr4 ,burr1 ,mr4 ,vitter1 ,mr4 ,boozman1 ,mr4 ,blunt1 ,mrs4 ,fischer1 ,mr4 ,thune1 ,mr4 ,johanns1 ,mr4 ,paul1 ,mr4 ,mc,connell1 ,mr4 ,coats1 ,mr4 ,cornyn1 ,mr4 ,cochran1 ,mr4 ,chambliss1 ,ms4 ,ayotte1 ,mr4 ,isakson1 and ,mr4 ,graham7 submitted the following resolution2 which was referred to the ,committee on ,health1 ,education1 ,labor1 and ,pensions ,,resolution ,expressing the sense of the ,senate that ,congress and the ,states should investigate and correct abusive1 unsanitary1 and illegal abortion practices4 ,whereas the ,declaration of ,independence sets forth the principle that all people are created equal and are endowed by their ,creator with certain unalienable rights1 and that among these rights are life1 liberty1 and the pursuit of happiness2 ,whereas the dedication of the people of the ,united ,states to this principle1 though at times tragically marred by institutions such as slavery and practices such as segregation and the denial of the right to vote1 has summoned the people of the ,united ,states time and again to fight for human dignity and the common good2 ,whereas the people of the ,united ,states believe that every human life is precious from its very beginning1 and that every individual1 regardless of age1 health1 or condition of dependency1 deserves the respect and protection of society2 ,whereas the people of the ,united ,states believe that early and consistent care for mothers1 with due regard both for the well-being of expectant mothers and for the children they carry1 is a primary goal of any sound health care policy in the ,united ,states2 ,whereas no woman should ever be abandoned1 by policy or practice1 to the depredations of an unlicensed1 unregulated1 or uninspected clinic operating outside of the law with no regard for the mothers or children ostensibly under its care2 ,whereas the ,report of the ,grand ,jury in the ,court of ,common ,pleas of the ,first ,judicial ,district of ,pennsylvania1 certified on ,january #ad1 #bjaa1 contains the results of a thorough investigation of the policies and practices of ,dr4 ,kermit ,gosnell and the ,women's ,medical ,society of ,philadelphia1 which found multiple violations of law and public policy relating to abortion clinics1 and recommended to the ,pennsylvania ,department of ,health that these abortion clinics be explicitly regulated as ambulatory surgical facilities1 so that they are inspected annually and held to the same standards as all other outpatient procedure centers2 ,whereas the ,report of the ,grand ,jury documented a pattern1 over a period of #b decades1 at the ,women's ,medical ,society of ,philadelphia of untrained and uncertified personnel performing abortions1 non-medical personnel administering medications1 grossly unsanitary and dangerous conditions1 violations of law regarding storage of human remains1 and1 above all1 instances of willful murder of infants born alive by severing their spinal cords2 ,whereas the violations of law and human dignity documented at the ,women's ,medical ,society of ,philadelphia involved women referred to the facility by abortion facilities in a number of surrounding ,states1 including ,virginia1 ,maryland1 ,north ,carolina1 and ,delaware2 ,whereas abortion clinics in a number of ,states1 particularly ,michigan and ,maryland1 and including #b clinics at which ,dr4 ,kermit ,gosnell performed or initiated abortions and #b ,planned ,parenthood facilities in ,delaware1 have been closed temporarily or permanently due to unsanitary conditions1 and the ,planned ,parenthood facilities in ,delaware have been described by former employees as resembling a meat market2 ,whereas the imposition of criminal and civil penalties on individuals and corporations involved in the deplorable practices described in this preamble is appropriate1 but is not the only necessary response to such practices2 ,whereas it is essential that the ,federal ,government and ,state and local governments take action to prevent dangerous conditions at abortion clinics2 ,whereas government accountability means that officials whose duty it is to protect the safety and well-being of mothers accessing health care clinics must have their actions made public and their failures redressed2 ,whereas the extent of1 and purported justification for1 legal and illegal abortions in the ,united ,states performed late in the second trimester of pregnancy and into and throughout the third trimester of pregnancy are not routinely reported by all ,states or by the ,centers for ,disease ,control1 and are therefore unknown2 ,whereas women and children in the ,united ,states deserve better than the #ef1ade1ibj abortions that have been performed in the ,united ,states since the ,supreme ,court rulings in ,roe v4 ,wade1 #daj ,u4,s4 #aac1 and ,doe v4 ,bolton1 #daj ,u4,s4 #agi1 in #aigc2 and ,whereas there is substantial medical evidence that an unborn child is capable of experiencing pain at #bj weeks after fertilization1 or earlier3 ,now1 therefore1 be it ,that it is the sense of the ,senate that-- 7#a7 ,congress and ,states should gather information about and correct-- 7,a7 abusive1 unsanitary1 and illegal abortion practices2 and 7,b7 the interstate referral of women and girls to facilities engaged in dangerous or illegal second- and third-trimester procedures2 7#b7 ,congress has the responsibility to-- 7,a7 investigate and conduct hearings on-- 7i7 abortions performed near1 at1 or after viability in the ,united ,states2 and 7ii7 public policies regarding such abortions2 and 7,b7 evaluate the extent to which such abortions involve violations of the natural right to life of infants who are born alive or are capable of being born alive1 and therefore are entitled to equal protection under the law2 7#c7 there is a compelling governmental interest in protecting the lives of unborn children beginning at least from the stage at which substantial medical evidence indicates that they are capable of feeling pain1 which is separate from and independent of the compelling governmental interest in protecting the lives of unborn children beginning at the stage of viability1 and neither governmental interest is intended to replace the other2 and 7#d7 governmental review of public policies and outcomes relating to the issues described in paragraphs 7#a7 through 7#d7 is long overdue and is an urgent priority that must be addressed for the sake of women1 children1 families1 and future generations4