,,ii #aacth ,,congress #b;d ,session ,s4 #bhga ,,in ,,the ,,senate ,,of ,,the ,,united ,,states ,september #ah1 #bjad ,mr4 ,hatch 7for himself1 ,mr4 ,coons1 and ,mr4 ,heller7 introduced the following bill2 which was read twice and referred to the ,committee on the ,judiciary ,a ,,bill ,to amend title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 to safeguard data stored abroad from improper government access1 and for other purposes4 #a4 ,short title ,this ,act may be cited as the ,the ,law ,enforcement ,access to ,data ,stored ,abroad ,act4 #b4 ,findings ,congress finds the following3 7#a7 ,the ,electronic ,communications ,privacy ,act of #aihf 7,public ,law #ii-ejh2 #ajj ,stat4 #ahdh7 7referred to in this section as ,,ecpa7 was intended to protect the privacy of electronic communications stored with providers of electronic communications services and remote computing services1 while balancing the legitimate needs of law enforcement to access records stored by such providers4 7#b7 ,to strike this balance1 ,,ecpa authorized governmental entities to obtain certain categories of communications data from providers using established1 pre-existing forms of process--warrants and subpoenas4 ,it also created a new form of court order1 in section #bgjc7;d7 of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 that governmental entities could use to obtain additional types of communications data4 7#c7 ,it has been well established that courts in the ,united ,states lack the power to issue warrants authorizing extraterritorial searches and seizures1 and neither ,,ecpa nor subsequent amendments extended the warrant power of courts in the ,united ,states beyond the territorial reach of the ,united ,states4 7#d7 ,nevertheless1 ,congress also recognizes the legitimate needs of law enforcement agencies in the ,united ,states to obtain1 through lawful process1 electronic communications relevant to criminal investigations related to ,united ,states persons wherever that content may be stored4 ,therefore1 this ,act authorizes the use of search warrants extraterritorially only where the ,government seeks to obtain the contents of electronic communications belonging to a ,united ,states person4 #c4 ,scope and clarification of warrant requirement 7a7 ,in general ,chapter #aba of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 is amended-- 7#a7 in section #bgjb7;a71 by amending paragraph 7#c7 to read as follows3 7#c7 a provider of remote computing service or electronic communication service to the public shall not knowingly divulge to any governmental entity the contents of any communication described in section #bgjc7;a71 or any record or other information pertaining to a subscriber or customer of such service4 2 7#b7 in section #bgjc-- 7,a7 by striking subsections 7a7 and 7b7 and inserting the following3 7a7 ,contents of wire or electronic communication in electronic storage ,a governmental entity may require the disclosure by a provider of electronic communication service or remote computing service of the contents of a wire or electronic communication that is in electronic storage with or otherwise stored1 held1 or maintained by the provider only pursuant to a warrant issued using the procedures described in the ,federal ,rules of ,criminal ,procedure 7or1 in the case of a ,state court1 issued using ,state warrant procedures7 by a court of competent jurisdiction4 ,subject to subsection 7b71 a warrant issued pursuant to this subsection may be used to require the disclosure of contents of a wire or electronic communication that are in the provider's electronic storage within the ,united ,states or otherwise stored1 held1 or maintained within the ,united ,states by the provider4 7b7 ,warrant requirements ,a warrant issued under subsection 7a7 may require the disclosure of the contents of a wire or electronic communication1 regardless of where such contents may be in electronic storage or otherwise stored1 held1 or maintained by the provider1 if the account-holder whose contents are sought by the warrant is a ,united ,states person4 ,a court issuing a warrant pursuant to this subsection1 on a motion made promptly by the service provider1 shall modify or vacate such warrant if the court finds that the warrant would require the provider of an electronic communications or remote computing service to violate the laws of a foreign country4 2 7,b7 in subsection 7d71 in the first sentence-- 7i7 by striking 7b7 or2 7ii7 by striking the contents of a wire or electronic communication1 or2 and 7iii7 by striking sought1 are and inserting sought are2 and 7,c7 by adding at the end the following3 7h7 ,rule of construction ,nothing in this section or in section #bgjb shall be construed to limit the authority of a governmental entity to use an administrative subpoena authorized under a ,federal or ,state statute or to use a ,federal or ,state grand jury1 trial1 or civil discovery subpoena to-- 7#a7 require an originator1 addressee1 or intended recipient of an electronic communication to disclose the contents of the electronic communication to the governmental entity2 or 7#b7 require an entity that provides electronic communication services to the officers1 directors1 employees1 or agents of the entity 7for the purpose of carrying out their duties7 to disclose the contents of an electronic communication to or from an officer1 director1 employee1 or agent of the entity to a governmental entity1 if the electronic communication is held1 stored1 or maintained on an electronic communications system owned or operated by the entity4 7i7 ,notice ,except as provided in section #bgje1 not later than #aj business days after a governmental entity receives the contents of a wire or electronic communication of a subscriber or customer from a provider of electronic communication service or remote computing service under subsection 7a71 the governmental entity shall serve upon1 or deliver to by registered or first-class mail1 electronic mail1 or other means reasonably calculated to be effective1 as specified by the court issuing the warrant1 the subscriber or customer-- 7#a7 a copy of the warrant2 and 7#b7 notice that informs the customer or subscriber-- 7,a7 of the nature of the law enforcement inquiry with reasonable specificity2 and 7,b7 that information maintained for the customer or subscriber by the provider of electronic communication service or remote computing service named in the process or request was supplied to1 or requested by1 the governmental entity4 2 7#c7 in section #bgjd7;a77#a71 by striking section #bgjc7;b77#b7 and inserting section #bgjc2 7#d7 in section #bgje-- 7,a7 in subsection 7a71 by striking paragraph 7#a7 and inserting the following3 7#a7 ,a governmental entity that is seeking a warrant under section #bgjc may include in the application for the warrant a request1 which the court shall grant1 for an order delaying the notification required under section #bgjc7;i7 for a period of not more than #ij days1 if the court determines that there is reason to believe that notification of the existence of the warrant may have an adverse result described in paragraph 7#b7 of this subsection4 2 and 7,b7 in subsection 7b71 in the matter preceding paragraph 7#a71 by striking under section #bgjc7;b77#a72 and 7#e7 in section #bgaa-- 7,a7 in paragraph 7#c77;,b7 by striking warrants2 and and inserting warrants2 7,b7 in paragraph 7#d7 by striking thereof4 and inserting thereof2 and2 and 7,c7 by adding at the end the following3 7#e7 the term ,united ,states person means a citizen or permanent resident alien of the ,united ,states1 or an entity or organization organized under the laws of the ,united ,states or a ,state or political subdivision thereof4 4 #d4 ,mutual legal assistance treaty reforms 7a7 ,mutual ,legal ,assistance ,treaty ,transparency and ,efficiency 7#a7 ,in general ,not later than #ahj days after the date of enactment of this ,act1 the ,attorney ,general shall establish-- 7,a7 a form for use by a foreign government filing a mutual legal assistance treaty request 7referred to in this section as an ,,mlat request71 which shall-- 7i7 be made available on the website of the ,department of ,justice2 and 7ii7 require sufficient information and be susceptible for use by a foreign government to provide all the information necessary for the ,,mlat request2 and 7,b7 an online docketing system for all ,,mlat requests1 which shall allow a foreign government to track the status of an ,,mlat request filed by the foreign government4 7#b7 ,annual publication ,beginning not later than #a year after the date of enactment of this ,act1 and each year thereafter1 the ,attorney ,general shall publish on the website of the ,department of ,justice statistics on-- 7,a7 7i7 the number of ,,mlat requests made by the ,department of ,justice to foreign governments for the purpose of obtaining the contents of an electronic communication or other information or records from a provider of electronic communications or remote computing services2 and 7ii7 the average length of time taken by foreign governments to process the ,,mlat requests described in clause 7i72 and 7,b7 7i7 the number of ,,mlat requests made to the ,department of ,justice by foreign governments for the purpose of obtaining the contents of an electronic communication or other information or records from a provider of electronic communications or remote computing services2 and 7ii7 the average length of time taken by the ,department of ,justice to process the ,,mlat requests described in clause 7i74 7#c7 ,notice to ,department of ,state ,the ,attorney ,general shall notify the ,secretary of ,state not later than #g days after the date on which disclosure of electronic communications content to a foreign government is made pursuant to an ,,mlat request4 7b7 ,preservation of ,records ,the ,attorney ,general may issue a request pursuant to section #bgjc7;f7 of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 upon receipt of an ,,mlat request that appears to be facially valid4 7c7 ,notification to ,provider of ,,mlat request ,when the ,attorney ,general makes use of the process provided in section #bgjc of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 to obtain information from an electronic communications provider or a remote computing provider based on an ,,mlat request1 the ,attorney ,general shall notify that provider in writing that the request has been made pursuant to a mutual legal assistance treaty4 #e4 ,sense of congress ,it is the sense of ,congress that-- 7#a7 data localization requirements imposed by foreign governments on data providers are-- 7,a7 incompatible with the borderless nature of the ,internet2 7,b7 an impediment to online innovation2 and 7,c7 unnecessary to meet the needs of law enforcement2 and 7#b7 the ,department of ,justice1 the ,department of ,state1 and the ,united ,states ,trade ,representatives should pursue open data flow policies with foreign nations4