,,iv  #aacth ,,congress  #b;d ,session  
,h4 ,,res4 #gjf  ,,in ,,the ,,house ,,of
 ,,representatives  ,july #ca1 #bjad    
,mr4 ,jones 7for himself and ,mr4       
,massie7 submitted the following        
resolution2 which was referred to the   
,committee on ,rules  ,,resolution      
,raising a question of the privileges of
 the ,house4  ,whereas ,h4,r4 #aabc1 the
 ,unlocking ,consumer ,choice and       
,wireless ,competition ,act1 was        
introduced on ,march #ac1 #bjac2        
,whereas the ,committee on the          
,judiciary marked up and ordered the    
bill reported1 with strong bipartisan   
support1 on ,july #ca1 #bjac2 ,whereas  
the suspension version of the bill      
included new language to prohibit the   
bulk unlocking of cellular phones2      
,whereas the changes made to the bill   
fundamentally altered the substance of  
the underlying bill2 ,whereas the report
 of the ,committee on the ,judiciary on 
the bill was filed in the ,house on     
,february #be1 #bjad2 and ,whereas the  

bill was passed under suspension of the 
rules on the night of ,february #be1    
#bjad3 ,now1 therefore1 be it  ,that the
 ,house of ,representatives disapproves 
of the actions taken by the ,committee  
on the ,judiciary and the leadership of 
the ,house of ,representatives with     
respect to ,h4,r4 #aabc and directs the 
leadership of each committee of the     
,house and the leadership of the ,house 
to operate in a matter that maximizes   
transparency and public trust4