,,iv  #aacth ,,congress  #b;d ,session  
,h4 ,,res4 #ffd  ,,in ,,the ,,house ,,of
 ,,representatives  ,july #aj1 #bjad    
,mr4 ,stockman submitted the following  
resolution2 which was referred to the   
,committee on ,rules  ,,resolution      
,providing for the arrest of ,lois ,g4  
,lerner to answer the charge of contempt
 of ,congress4  ,whereas ,lois ,g4      
,lerner1 former ,director1 ,exempt      
,organizations1 ,internal ,revenue      
,service1 has been found to be in       
contempt of ,congress for willfully and 
intentionally refusing to comply with a 
congressional subpoena duly issued by   
the ,committee on ,oversight and        
,government ,reform1 thereby obstructing
 the ,congress in the lawful exercise of
 its constitutionally mandated          
legislative powers2 ,whereas such       
behavior is an insult to the dignity of 
the ,house of ,representatives1 an      
attack upon the integrity of its        
proceedings1 works violence upon the    
rights of the ,house collectively1 and  

therefore implicates the long-recognized
 inherent power of the ,house to punish 
and commit for contempt1 privileged     
under the ,constitution2 ,whereas recent
 history with similarly contumacious and
 insolent witnesses such as ,eric       
,himpton ,holder1 ,junior1 strongly     
suggests that the present statutory     
judicial rubric set up to punish and    
reform such insubordinate and           
obstructionist witnesses would be       
ineffective in this case1 as it is      
likely that the ,u4,s4 ,attorney for the
 ,district of ,columbia would refuse to 
perform his lawful duty to bring the    
offending contemnor ,lerner before a    
,grand ,jury and prosecute the same for 
her misconduct pursuant to section #ajd 
of the ,revised ,statutes of the ,united
 ,states 7#b ,u4,s4,c4 #aid7 and section
 #ajb of the ,revised ,statutes of the  
,united ,states 7#b ,u4,s4,c4 #aib72    
,whereas the executive and judicial     
branches' prolonged and dawdling failure
 to prosecute ,attorney ,general        

,holder's insolent contempt of the      
#aabth ,congress strongly suggests that 
a like proceeding against contemnor     
,lerner would be similarly futile1 and  
the threat of such prosecution has      
clearly been insufficient to encourage  
contemnor ,lerner to be honest and      
candid with the ,congress regarding the 
heinous actions of the ,internal        
,revenue ,service3 ,now1 therefore1 be  
it  ,that the ,speaker issue his        
warrant1 directed to the                
,sergeant-at-,arms1 or his deputy1      
commanding him to arrest and take into  
custody forthwith1 wherever to be found1
 the body of ,lois ,g4 ,lerner1 and     
bring her to the bar of the ,house      
without delay to answer to the charge of
 contempt of its authority1 breach of   
its privileges1 and gross and wanton    
insult to the integrity of its          
proceedings1 and in the meantime keep   
the body of ,lerner in his custody in   
the common jail of the ,district of     
,columbia1 subject to the further order 

of the ,house4 ,while in custody1       
,lerner shall enjoy no special          
privileges beyond those extended to her 
fellow inmates1 shall not access any    
computer or telephone1 and shall not be 
visited by anyone other than her        
counsel1 clergy1 physician1 or family4