,,iv  #aacth ,,congress  #ast ,session  
,h4 ,,res4 #ccc  ,,in ,,the ,,house ,,of
 ,,representatives  ,august #b1 #bjac   
,mr4 ,stockman submitted the following  
resolution2 which was referred to the   
,committee on ,appropriations1 and in   
addition to the ,committee on ,ways and 
,means1 for a period to be subsequently 
determined by the ,speaker1 in each case
 for consideration of such provisions as
 fall within the jurisdiction of the    
committee concerned  ,,resolution       
,expressing the firm conviction of the  
,house of ,representatives that any     
continuing resolution or debt ceiling   
increase it may approve for the duration
 of the #aacth ,congress shall          
affirmatively include a provision       
specifically prohibiting the expenditure
 of any ,federal funds in support of or 
in implementation or effectuation or    
enforcement of any provision of the     
,affordable ,care ,act 7,obama,care74   
,whereas every ,representative solemnly 
swore to support and defend the         

,constitution of the ,united ,states    
against all domestic enemies1 and bear  
true faith and allegiance to the same1  
and freely took said obligation before  
,god2 ,whereas a majority of            
,representatives believes the           
,affordable ,care ,act 7,obama,care7    
violates the ,constitution in sundry    
ways1 and its implementation and        
enforcement would deprive ,american     
citizens of cherished fundamental       
constitutional rights2 ,whereas in      
addition to its organic constitutional  
infirmities1 at least one               
,administrative ,rule promulgated       
pursuant to ,obama,care has further     
harmed the constitutional rights of     
citizens by attacking religious         
liberties guaranteed by the ,first      
,amendment to our constitution for over 
two centuries1 said liberties being once
 held sacrosanct by this body2 ,whereas 
the ,fiscal ,year #bjad ,budget         
,resolution already passed by this      
,house of ,representatives wisely and   

appropriately presumed the defunding of 
,obama,care subsequent to and pursuant  
to a more sober consideration of its    
rash and sweeping provisions1 free from 
the hysteria and parochial politics of  
the moment of its passing1 which sober  
consideration revealed ,obama,care's    
many and now manifest kinks1 flaws1     
deficiencies1 and inadequacies1 both    
constitutional and logistical2 ,whereas 
a bipartisan majority of                
,representatives voted to repeal        
,obama,care on ,may #af1 #bjac2 ,whereas
 a majority of ,representatives supports
 the provision of the ,house            
,republicans' #bjaj ,pledge to ,america 
that promises1 in no uncertain terms1   
,we will repeal ,president ,obama's     
government takeover of health care2     
,whereas a majority of ,representatives 
remains committed to the ,repealing     
,obamacare ,plank of the #bjab          
,republican ,party ,platform1 which     
states1 in pertinent part3 ,we agree    
with the four dissenting justices of the

 ,supreme ,court3 ,in our view the      
entire ,act before us is invalid in its 
entirety4 ''' ,obamacare has been struck
 down in the court of public opinion and
 is falling by the weight of its own    
confusing1 unworkable1 budget-busting1  
and conflicting provisions4 ''' ,if     
fully implemented1 it could not         
function2 ''' ,congressional            
,republicans are committed to its       
repeal2 ,whereas a majority of          
,representatives shares the ,speaker's  
view that ,obama,care is a monstrosity  
that will ruin the best health care     
system in the world and bankrupt this   
country1 that it is driving up the cost 
of health insurance1 denying people     
access to quality care1 and killing jobs
 in ,america1 and asks1 as the ,speaker 
has asked1 ,how can you provide         
subsidies through these health exchanges
 without verifying people's income8 ,i  
mean our job is to protect the ,american
 people1 is to spend their taxpayer     
money wisely4 ,i think it's wide open   

for abuse2 ,whereas a majority of       
,representatives supports the pledge    
twice expressed by the ,speaker in ,july
 #bjac regarding the funding of         
,obama,care3 ,we're going to do         
everything we can to make sure it never 
happens1 and further1 ,we will do       
everything we can to make sure this     
doesn't really go into effect4 ,we will 
continue to do everything we can to     
defund it ''' and to make sure that the 
,american people aren't put through this
 horrific experience2 ,whereas          
notwithstanding the oft-repeated        
8guarantee0 previously expressed by     
,president ,obama that citizens will    
definitely be able to keep their present
 doctors after the implementation of    
,obama,care1 the ,department of ,health 
and ,human ,services 7,,hhs7 has        
recently announced you ,,may be able to 
keep your current doctor 7emphasis      
supplied71 thereby conceding that the   
,president's promise to the citizenry   
has not been kept1 and that the         

legislation contains no such guarantee2 
,whereas the ,presidential              
,administration's recent decision to    
delay ,obama,care's employer mandate and
 eligibility verification for individual
 exchanges constitutes a tacit admission
 that ,obama,care is1 in the words of   
the ,chairman of the ,senate ,committee 
on ,finance1 at best1 a 8train wreck0   
not yet ready for prime time1 and more  
likely1 an imminent disaster2 ,whereas  
the ,congressional ,budget ,office      
7,,cbo7 reports 7#a7 the ,federal       
,government will spend #dh billion in   
#bjad--;and nearly #a4h trillion through
 #bjbc--on ,obama,care's new entitlement
 programs1 7#b7 the ,presidential       
,administration has requested more than 
#djj million in funding and nearly      
#b1jjj bureaucrats for the ,,irs to     
implement the individual mandate and #df
 other statutory provisions in the law1 
7#c7 executive branch agencies'         
bureaucrats have already written more   
than #bj1jjj pages of                   

,obama,care-related rules and notices   
published in the ,federal ,register1 and
 7#d7 ,,cbo estimates ,obama,care will  
raise individual health insurance       
premiums by #b1ajj per year2 ,whereas   
the current ,obama,care statute is no   
longer the legitimate product of the    
legislative voice of the ,american      
people1 having been rewritten by the two
 branches of government least           
accountable to those people1 inasmuch as
 the ,president has used and continues  
to use myriad waivers and delays to     
alter various sections of the           
legislation to suit his own policy and  
political objectives1 and the ,chief    
,justice of the ,supreme ,court having  
flagrantly disregarded the position of  
the people that ,obama,care is not a    
product of the taxing power2 ,whereas   
the ,house of the people should not     
force the ,american citizenry to fund   
,obama,care if the ,presidential        
,administration will not enforce the law
 as written2 ,whereas inasmuch as the   

,house of ,representatives cannot       
control the actions of the ,united      
,states ,senate or the ,president1 and  
has no power to prevent the ,senate or  
the ,president from shutting down the   
government if either chooses to do so by
 refusing to approve or sign a          
,continuing ,resolution1 passed by the  
,house of ,representatives1 that will   
fund the government's operations and    
satisfy its obligations to it citizenry 
and others2 ,whereas the ,democratic    
,caucus of the ,united ,states ,senate  
has had sixty 7#fj7 or more ,members for
 only four months of the last #cd years1
 and ,congressional ,democrats exploited
 that anomalous window in the #aaath    
,congress to pass ,obama,care2 ,whereas 
the ,republican ,conference of the      
,united ,states ,senate has not had     
sixty 7#fj7 or more ,members since the  
#fast ,congress adjourned sine die in   
the year of our ,lord #aiaa and         
therefore the outright repeal of        
,obama,care must be presumed to be nigh 

unto an electoral impossibility1        
irrespective of how favorable the next  
election is to ,republican ,senate      
candidates2 ,whereas the only means by  
which ,obama,care can be halted is for  
the ,congress to exercise its power of  
the purse to defund it1 and thereby     
effect constructive repeal2 and ,whereas
 defunding ,obama,care will become more 
complicated and difficult to achieve    
after ,october #a1 #bjac 7the date      
enrollment for the ,medicaid expansion  
and exchange subsidies begins7 and      
especially after ,january #a1 #bjad 7the
 date those new entitlement programs are
 scheduled to take effect1 and          
,americans will be forced either to buy 
a product or pay tax penalties          
administered by the ,,irs73 ,now1       
therefore1 be it  ,that for the balance 
of the #aacth ,congress1 the ,house of  
,representatives shall pass no bill or  
resolution that continues appropriations
 in the event of a lapse in             
appropriations or increases the         

borrowing authority relating to the     
public debt limit 7or suspends or       
terminates the debt ceiling7 unless said
 resolution contains a provision        
affirmatively and specifically          
prohibiting the expenditure of any      
,federal funds 7whether such expenditure
 be discretionary or mandatory7 to      
implement or enforce any provision of   
the ,patient ,protection and ,affordable
 ,care ,act 7,public ,law #aaa-adh7 or  
title ,i or subtitle ,b of title ,,ii of
 the ,health ,care and ,education       
,reconciliation ,act of #bjaj 7,public  
,law #aaa-aeb74