,i #aacth ,,congress #ast ,session ,h4 ,r4 #gaj ,,in ,,the ,,house ,,of ,,representatives ,february #ad1 #bjac ,mr4 ,farr 7for himself1 ,mr4 ,rohrabacher1 ,mr4 ,blumenauer1 ,mr4 ,cohen1 ,mr4 ,grijalva1 ,ms4 ,lee of ,california1 ,mr4 ,moran1 ,ms4 ,pingree of ,maine1 ,mr4 ,polis1 and ,mr4 ,waxman7 introduced the following bill2 which was referred to the ,committee on the ,judiciary ,a ,,bill ,to amend title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 to provide an affirmative defense for the medical use of marijuana in accordance with the laws of the various ,states1 and for other purposes4 #a4 ,short title ,this ,act may be cited as the ,truth in ,trials ,act4 #b4 ,providing an affirmative defense for the medical use of marijuana2 seizure of property 7a7 ,in general ,chapter #bba of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 is amended by striking section #cdcf and all that follows through the end of the chapter and inserting the following3 #cdcf4 ,affirmative defense for conduct regarding the medical use of marijuana2 seizure of property 7a7 ,any person facing prosecution or a proceeding for any marijuana-related offense under any ,federal law shall have the right to introduce evidence demonstrating that the marijuana-related activities for which the person stands accused were performed in compliance with ,state law regarding the medical use of marijuana1 or that the property which is subject to a proceeding was possessed in compliance with ,state law regarding the medical use of marijuana4 7b7 7#a7 ,it is an affirmative defense to a prosecution or proceeding under any ,federal law for marijuana-related activities1 which the proponent must establish by a preponderance of the evidence1 that those activities comply with ,state law regarding the medical use of marijuana4 7#b7 ,in a prosecution or a proceeding for a marijuana-related offense under any ,federal criminal law1 should a finder of fact determine1 based on ,state law regarding the medical use of marijuana1 that a defendant's marijuana-related activity was performed primarily1 but not exclusively1 for medical purposes1 the defendant may be found guilty of an offense only corresponding to the amount of marijuana determined to be for nonmedical purposes4 7c7 ,any property seized in connection with a prosecution or proceeding to which this section applies1 with respect to which a person successfully makes a defense under this section1 shall be returned to the owner not later than #aj days after the court finds the defense is valid1 minus such material necessarily destroyed for testing purposes4 7d7 ,any marijuana seized under any ,federal law shall be retained and not destroyed pending resolution of any forfeiture claim1 if not later than #cj days after seizure the owner of the property notifies the ,attorney ,general1 or a duly authorized agent of the ,attorney ,general1 that a person with an ownership interest in the property is asserting an affirmative defense for the medical use of marijuana4 7e7 ,no plant may be seized under any ,federal law otherwise permitting such seizure if the plant is being grown or stored pursuant to a recommendation by a physician or an order of a ,state or municipal agency in accordance with ,state law regarding the medical use of marijuana4 7f7 ,in this section1 the term ,state includes the ,district of ,columbia1 ,puerto ,rico1 and any other territory or possession of the ,united ,states4 4 7b7 ,clerical amendment ,the table of sections at the beginning of chapter #bba of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 is amended by striking the item relating to section #cdcf and all that follows through the end of the table and inserting the following new item3 #cdcf4 ,affirmative defense for conduct regarding the medical use of marijuana2 seizure of property4 4