,i  #aac? ,,congress  #b;d ,session  ,h4
 ,r4 #eeje  ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,(          
,,repres5tatives  ,septemb] #ag1 #bjad  
,mr4 ,olson 7= himself1 ,mr4 ,latta1    
,mr4 ,%imkus1 ,mr4 ,web] ( ,texas1 ,mr4 
,cassidy1 ,mr4 ,flores1 ,mr4 ,smi? (    
,texas1 ,mr4 ,hall1 ,mr4 ,mc,clintock1  
,mr4 ,hultgr51 ,mr4 ,tipton1 ,mr4       
,mc,kinley1 ,mr4 ,smi? ( ,miss\ri1 ,mr4 
,jones1 ,mrs4 ,noem1 ,mrs4 ,lummis1 ,mr4
 ,pompeo1 ,mr4 ,h>p]1 ,mr4 ,brady (     
,texas1 ,mr4 ,long1 ,mr4 ,johnson (     
,ohio1 & ,mr4 ,cuell>7 introduc$ !      
foll[+ bill2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to !          
,committee on ,en]gy & ,comm]ce  ,a     
,,bill  ,to improve ! e/abli%m5t ( any  
l[] gr\nd-level ozone /&>ds1 & = o!r    
purposes4  #a4 ,%ort title ,?is ,act may
 be cit$ z ! ,clean ,air1 ,/rong        
,economies ,act4  #b4 ,gr\nd-level ozone
 /&>ds ,not)/&+ any o!r provision ( law 
7includ+ regulations71 9 promulgat+ a   
national prim>y or second>y ambi5t air  
quality /&>d = ozone1 ! ,adm9i/rator ( !
 ,environm5tal ,protection ,ag5cy--     

7#a7 %all n propose a national prim>y or
 second>y ambi5t air quality /&>d =     
ozone t is l[] ?an ! /&>d e/abli%$ "u   
section #ej4ae ( title #dj1 ,code (     
,f$]al ,regulations 7z 9 effect on      
,janu>y #a1 #bjad71 until at lea/ #he   
p]c5t ( ! c\nties t 7 nonatta9m5t areas 
"u t /&>d z ( ,janu>y #a1 #bjad1 a*ieve 
full compliance ) t /&>d2  7#b7 %all    
only consid] all or "p ( a c\nty to be a
 nonatta9m5t area "u ! /&>d on ! basis (
 direct air quality monitor+2  7#c7 %all
 take into consid]ation feasibility &   
co/2 &  7#d7 %all include 9 ! regulatory
 impact analysis = ! propos$ & f9al rule
 at lea/ #a analysis t does n include   
any calculation ( b5efits result+ f     
r$uc+ emissions ( any pollutant o!r ?an 
ozone4