,i #aacth ,,congress #b;d ,session ,h4 ,r4 #djdg ,,in ,,the ,,house ,,of ,,representatives ,february #aa1 #bjad ,mr4 ,culberson introduced the following bill2 which was referred to the ,committee on the ,judiciary ,a ,,bill ,to protect #ajth ,amendment rights by providing special standing for ,state government officials to challenge proposed regulations1 and for other purposes4 #a4 ,short title ,this ,act may be cited as the ,restoring the #ajth ,amendment ,act4 #b4 ,findings ,the ,congress finds3 7#a7 ,the #ajth ,amendment to the ,constitution of the ,united ,states 7referred to in this ,act as the #ajth ,amendment71 ratified on ,december #ae1 #agia1 provides1 ,the powers not delegated to the ,united ,states by the ,constitution1 nor prohibited by it to the ,states1 are reserved to the ,states respectively1 or to the people44 7#b7 ,the #ajth ,amendment expressly limits the powers of the ,federal ,government to those delegated by the ,constitution and reaffirms and protects the freedom of the ,states to exercise those that are not4 7#c7 ,the #ajth ,amendment reflects the opposition of the ,founding ,fathers to a ,federal ,government with expansive powers1 their intention for the powers of the ,states to act as a check on those of the ,federal ,government1 and their concern that the ,federal ,government would attempt to usurp powers intended to remain with the ,states4 7#d7 ,james ,madison1 in ,the ,federalist ,no4 #de1 wrote1 ,the powers delegated by the proposed ,constitution to the federal government are few and defined4 ,those which are to remain in the ,state governments are numerous and indefinite44 7#e7 ,the ,supreme ,court1 in ,united ,states v4 ,sprague1 #bhb ,u4,s4 #gaf 7#aica71 noted1 ,the ,tenth ,amendment was intended to confirm the understanding of the people at the time the ,constitution was adopted1 that powers not granted to the ,united ,states were reserved to the ,states or to the people44 7#f7 ,the ,supreme ,court1 in ,fry v4 ,united ,states1 #dba ,u4,s4 #edb 7#aige71 also noted1 ,the ,amendment expressly declares the constitutional policy that ,congress may not exercise power in a fashion that impairs the ,states' integrity or their ability to function effectively in a federal system44 7#g7 ,the ,executive departments and agencies of the ,federal ,government often promulgate regulations contrary to the spirit and letter of the #ajth ,amendment4 7#h7 ,the #ajth ,amendment assures that the people of the ,united ,states1 and each sovereign ,state in the ,union of ,states1 have1 and have always had1 rights that the ,federal ,government may not usurp4 7#i7 ,congress has the responsibility to safeguard the #ajth ,amendment and to recognize that it is as vital and valuable today as on the date of its ratification4 #c4 ,special standing for certain ,state officials to challenge ,federal rulemaking as a violation of the #ajth ,amendment 7a7 ,definitions ,in this section-- 7#a7 the term agency has the meaning given that term in section #eea of title #e1 ,united ,states ,code2 7#b7 the term designated ,state official means1 with respect to a ,state-- 7,a7 the chief executive of the ,state2 7,b7 the lieutenant governor or equivalent officer of the ,state2 7,c7 the chief legal officer of the ,state2 or 7,d7 a legislative leader of the ,state2 7#c7 the term legislative leader means a speaker1 majority leader1 or minority leader1 of a ,state legislature or any ,house thereof2 and 7#d7 the term rule has the meaning given that term in section #eea of title #e1 ,united ,states ,code4 7b7 ,submission of legal brief ,during any period during which a proposed rule is open for public comment under chapter #e of title #e1 ,united ,states ,code1 any designated ,state official may submit to the head of the agency proposing the rule a legal brief challenging the constitutionality of the proposed rule under the #ajth ,amendment4 7c7 ,duty of ,federal official ,to post link to the brief ,the head of the agency proposing a rule described in subsection 7b7 shall prominently post on the front page of the ,web site of the agency1 in such a manner that it is immediately noticeable to individuals who visit that ,web site1 a link to each brief submitted under subsection 7b74 7d7 ,response by ,federal agency ,unless an agency determines not to finalize a proposed rule described in subsection 7b71 not later than #ae days after posting the link under subsection 7c71 the head of the agency shall-- 7#a7 certify in writing that1 in the opinion of the head of the agency1 the rule does not violate the #ajth ,amendment2 7#b7 include in the certification the full legal reasoning supporting that opinion2 and 7#c7 prominently post the certification on the front page of the ,web site of the agency next to the links to the legal briefs pertaining to the rule posted under subsection 7c74 7e7 ,notice to officials of other ,states ,not later than #ae days after the date on which a designated ,state official submits a brief under subsection 7b71 the head of the agency proposing the rule shall give notice to each designated ,state official of each ,state that the brief was submitted4 7f7 ,actions by ,state officials 7#a7 ,commencement of action ,at any time after the head of an agency posts a certification under subsection 7d7 that a rule does not violate the #ajth ,amendment1 a designated ,state official may commence a civil action against the agency on the grounds that the rule of the agency violates the #ajth ,amendment4 7#b7 ,venue and jurisdiction ,if a designated ,state official decides to commence an action under paragraph 7#a71 in addition to any other venue or jurisdiction that may be provided by law1 the official may bring the action in the district court of the ,united ,states for the district in which the place of business of the official is located1 which shall be a proper venue for the action and the court shall have jurisdiction of the action4 7#c7 ,expedited appeal ,upon the filing of a notice of appeal by a designated ,state official who is a party to an action described in paragraph 7#a7 brought in a district court of the ,united ,states1 the appropriate court of appeals of the ,united ,states shall grant expedited review of a decision by the district court in the action4