,i #aacth ,,congress #ast ,session ,h4 ,r4 #babg ,,in ,,the ,,house ,,of ,,representatives ,may #bc1 #bjac ,mr4 ,mc,kinley 7for himself1 ,mr4 ,rahall1 ,mrs4 ,capito1 ,mr4 ,johnson of ,ohio1 ,mr4 ,olson1 ,mr4 ,latta1 ,mr4 ,griffith of ,virginia1 and ,mr4 ,peterson7 introduced the following bill2 which was referred to the ,committee on ,energy and ,commerce ,a ,,bill ,to prohibit the ,administrator of the ,environmental ,protection ,agency from finalizing any rule imposing any standard of performance for carbon dioxide emissions from any existing or new source that is a fossil fuel-fired electric utility generating unit unless and until carbon capture and storage is found to be technologically and economically feasible4 #a4 ,no finalization of any standard of performance for carbon dioxide emissions from any existing or new fossil fuel-fired electric utility generating unit unless carbon capture and storage is technologically and economically feasible 7a7 ,in general ,the ,administrator of the ,environmental ,protection ,agency shall not finalize any rule imposing any standard of performance under section #aaa of the ,clean ,air ,act 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #gdaa7 for emissions of carbon dioxide from any existing or new source that is a fossil fuel-fired electric utility generating unit unless and until-- 7#a7 the ,administrator determines in accordance with such section #aaa that carbon capture and storage is the best system of emission reduction which 7taking into account the cost of achieving such reduction and any nonair health and environmental impact and energy requirements7 the ,administrator determines has been adequately demonstrated2 and 7#b7 carbon capture and storage is found to be technologically and economically feasible for fossil fuel-fired electric utility generating units in a report that is published in the ,federal ,register1 and submitted to the ,congress1 by at least three of the following four officials3 7,a7 ,the ,administrator of the ,energy ,information ,administration4 7,b7 ,the ,comptroller ,general of the ,united ,states4 7,c7 ,the ,director of the ,national ,energy ,technology ,laboratory4 7,d7 ,the ,under ,secretary of ,commerce for ,standards and ,technology4 7b7 ,prohibition against combined source category ,in proposing or finalizing any rule imposing any standard of performance under section #aaa of the ,clean ,air ,act 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #gdaa7 for emissions of carbon dioxide from any existing or new source that is a fossil fuel-fired electric utility generating unit1 the ,administrator of the ,environmental ,protection ,agency shall not combine in the same category of stationary sources-- 7#a7 electric utility steam generating units subject to subpart ,da of part #fj1 title #dj1 ,code of ,federal ,regulations 7as in effect on the date of the enactment of this ,act72 and 7#b7 combined cycle electric generating units subject to subpart ,,kkkk of such part 7as in effect on such date74 7c7 ,definitions ,in this section3 7#a7 ,the term economically feasible means the present discounted value of the revenue from the projected sale of electricity from a generating unit in a competitive market over the life of a unit that employs carbon capture and storage exceeds the present discounted value of the cost of the unit1 including costs associated with any energy required to capture1 compress1 transport1 and store carbon dioxide4 7#b7 ,the terms existing source and new source have the meanings given such term in section #aaa7;a7 of the ,clean ,air ,act 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #gdaa7;a774 7#c7 ,the term technologically feasible refers to the demonstrated operation of carbon capture and storage technologies integrated with power production at an appropriate scale to ensure safe and reliable production of electricity with capture and storage on a widespread geographic basis4