,i #aac? ,,congress #a/ ,session ,h4 ,r4 #ahei ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,( ,,repres5tatives ,may #g1 #bjac ,mr4 ,s*iff 7= himself & ,ms4 ,*u7 introduc$ ! foll[+ bill2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee on ,transportation & ,infra/ructure ,a ,,bill ,to revise ! process by :i* ! ,f$]al ,em]g5cy ,managem5t ,ag5cy evaluates a reque/ = major disa/] assi/ance1 & = o!r purposes4 #a4 ,%ort title ,?is ,act may be cit$ z ! ,disa/] ,decl>ation ,improvem5t ,act ( #bjac4 #b4 ,f9d+s ,congress f9ds ! foll[+3 7#a7 ,! process t ! ,f$]al ,em]g5cy ,managem5t ,ag5cy 7,,fema7 uses to det]m9e :e!r major disa/] assi/ance %\ld be recomm5d$ to ! ,presid5t is badly flaw$4 7#b7 ,! ,gov]nm5t ,acc\ntability ,(fice's #bjab report on ! ,,fema disa/] assi/ance process /at$ t accord+ to ,,fema & /ate em]g5cy managem5t (ficials1 ,,fema has prim>ily reli$ on a s+le indicator1 ! /atewide p] capita damage indicator1 to det]m9e :e!r to recomm5d t a jurisdiction receive ,public ,assi/ance fund+4 7#c7 ,! ,gov]nm5t ,acc\ntability ,(fice's #bjab report on ! ,,fema disa/] assi/ance process also /at$ t #bdd ( #bdf approv$ disa/] decl>ations dur+ fiscal ye>s #bjjh ?r\gh #bjaa _h damage e/imates t met or exce$$ ! ,public ,assi/ance p] capita indicator4 7#d7 ,f$]al regulations d n prioritize ! factors to be consid]$ 9 recomm5d+ a major disa/] decl>ation1 b ,,fema cle>ly does1 z #ii p]c5t ( disa/]s 9 fiscal ye>s #bjjh ?r\gh #bjaa t satisfi$ ,,fema's /atewide p] capita damage ?re%old receiv$ a disa/] decl>ation4 7#e7 ,,fema %\ld give1 9 its future evaluation ( ,gov]nor-submitt$ reque/s = major disa/] assi/ance1 equal consid]ation to all ( ! factors describ$ 9 section #bjf4dh7;a7 ( title #dd1 ,code ( ,f$]al ,regulations1 s t ! process = recomm5d+ major disa/] assi/ance w "w z orig9ally int5d$4 7#f7 ,ano!r flaw 9 ,,fema's process1 t communities )9 l>ge ,/ates & c\nties are unfairly disadvantag$1 mu/ also be address$4 7#g7 ,evaluation ( ,gov]nor-submitt$ reque/s = major disa/] assi/ance on ! basis ( a /atewide p] capita damage ?re%old1 & occasionally a c\ntywide p] capita damage ?re%old1 e/abli%es a high] ?re%old = ,/ates & c\nties ) l>ge populations to receive major disa/] assi/ance1 ev5 ?\gh !re is no indication t !y h a great] fiscal capacity to respond to disa/]s4 7#h7 ,! inequity describ$ 9 p>agraphs 7#f7 & 7#g7 means t communities c suff] high levels ( disa/]-relat$ damage b n receive ! assi/ance !y ne$ to quickly recov] f ! disa/]4 7#i7 ,,fema %\ld consid] m ?an j ! /atewide & c\ntywide p] capita damage ?re%olds 9 evaluat+ a reque/ = major disa/] assi/ance1 s t communities 9 l>ge population c\nties 9 l>ge population ,/ates d n face an unreasonably high b>ri] to receiv+ assi/ance foll[+ a disa/]4 #c4 ,consid]ation ( major disa/] assi/ance reque/s ,n lat] ?an #ahj days aft] ! date ( enactm5t ( ?is ,act1 ! ,adm9i/rator ( ! ,f$]al ,em]g5cy ,managem5t ,ag5cy %all issue regulations to ensure t-- 7#a7 9 any review ( a reque/ = major disa/] assi/ance conduct$ by ! ,f$]al ,em]g5cy ,managem5t ,ag5cy1 ! factor describ$ 9 section #bjf4dh7;a77#a7 ( title #dd1 ,code ( ,f$]al ,regulations 7relat+ to ! e/imat$ co/ ( assi/ance71 is provid$ consid]ation t is equal to ! consid]ation provid$ to ea* ( ! o!r factors describ$ 9 section #bjf4dh7;a7 ( su* title2 & 7#b7 a reque/ = major disa/] assi/ance by a ,/ate is consid]$ by ! ,f$]al ,em]g5cy ,managem5t ,ag5cy = recomm5dation to ! ,presid5t1 )\t reg>d to any p] capita damage ?re%old 7o!r ?an a ?re%old describ$ 9 ?is p>agraph71 9 any case 9 :i* a disa/] occurs ) respect to a city or un9corporat$ jurisdiction-- 7,a7 ) a population ( less ?an #bej1jjj2 7,b7 locat$ 9 a c\nty ) a population ( m ?an #a1jjj1jjj & a ,/ate ) a population ( m ?an #e1jjj1jjj2 & 7,c7 ) respect to :i* ! f9ancial damage relat+ to ! disa/] exce$s-- 7i7 9 ! case ( a city1 #aj p]c5t ( ! city's g5]al fund2 or 7ii7 9 ! case ( an un9corporat$ jurisdiction1 #ajj p] capita4