,,ib ,house ,calendar ,no4 #ba #aacth ,,congress #ast ,session ,h4 ,r4 #aehj ,report ,no4 #aac-ej ,,in ,,the ,,house ,,of ,,representatives ,april #af1 #bjac ,mr4 ,walden 7for himself1 ,ms4 ,eshoo1 ,mr4 ,hall1 ,mr4 ,lance1 ,mr4 ,gardner1 ,mr4 ,olson1 ,mr4 ,johnson of ,ohio1 ,mr4 ,long1 ,mr4 ,kinzinger of ,illinois1 ,mr4 ,bilirakis1 ,mrs4 ,ellmers1 ,mrs4 ,christensen1 ,mr4 ,mc,kinley1 ,mr4 ,dingell1 ,mr4 ,gene ,green of ,texas1 ,mr4 ,cassidy1 ,mr4 ,pompeo1 ,mr4 ,shimkus1 ,mr4 ,latta1 ,mr4 ,guthrie1 ,mr4 ,royce1 ,ms4 ,matsui1 ,mr4 ,scalise1 ,mrs4 ,blackburn1 ,mr4 ,rogers of ,michigan1 ,mr4 ,burgess1 ,mr4 ,murphy of ,pennsylvania1 ,mr4 ,terry1 ,mr4 ,poe of ,texas1 ,mr4 ,gingrey of ,georgia1 ,mr4 ,welch1 ,mr4 ,barton1 and ,mr4 ,pitts7 introduced the following bill2 which was referred to the ,committee on ,energy and ,commerce ,may #c1 #bjac ,referred to the ,house ,calendar and ordered to be printed ,a ,,bill ,to affirm the policy of the ,united ,states regarding ,internet governance4 #a4 ,findings ,the ,congress finds the following3 7#a7 ,given the importance of the ,internet to the global economy1 it is essential that the ,internet remain stable1 secure1 and free from government control4 7#b7 ,the world deserves the access to knowledge1 services1 commerce1 and communication1 the accompanying benefits to economic development1 education1 and health care1 and the informed discussion that is the bedrock of democratic self-government that the ,internet provides4 7#c7 ,the structure of ,internet governance has profound implications for competition and trade1 democratization1 free expression1 and access to information4 7#d7 ,countries have obligations to protect human rights1 whether exercised online or offline4 7#e7 ,the ability to innovate1 develop technical capacity1 grasp economic opportunities1 and promote freedom of expression online is best realized in cooperation with all stakeholders4 7#f7 ,proposals have been1 and will likely continue to be1 put forward at international regulatory bodies that would fundamentally alter the governance and operation of the ,internet4 7#g7 ,the proposals would attempt to justify increased government control over the ,internet and could undermine the current multistakeholder model that has enabled the ,internet to flourish and under which the private sector1 civil society1 academia1 and individual users play an important role in charting its direction4 7#h7 ,the proposals would diminish the freedom of expression on the ,internet in favor of government control over content4 7#i7 ,the position of the ,united ,states ,government has been and is to advocate for the flow of information free from government control4 7#aj7 ,this ,administration and past ,administrations have made a strong commitment to the multistakeholder model of ,internet governance and the promotion of the global benefits of the ,internet4 #b4 ,policy regarding ,internet governance ,it is the policy of the ,united ,states to preserve and advance the successful multistakeholder model that governs the ,internet4 ,may #c1 #bjac ,referred to the ,house ,calendar and ordered to be printed