,,iv  #aac? ,,congress  #b;d ,session   
,h4 ,,con4 ,,res4 #gg  ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se   
,,( ,,repres5tatives  ,janu>y #af1      
#bjad,mr4 ,duffy submitt$ ! foll[+      
concurr5t resolution2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! 
,committee on ,=eign ,affairs           
,,concurr5t ,,resolution  ,express+ !   
s5se ( ,congress oppos+ ! proposal by ! 
,unit$ ,/ates ,dep>tm5t ( ,/ate to      
relocate ! ,unit$ ,/ates ,embassy to !  
,holy ,see4  ,:]eas ! ,unit$ ,/ates     
,dep>tm5t ( ,/ate has ann\nc$ plans to  
relocate ! ,unit$ ,/ates ,embassy to !  
,holy ,see2 ,:]eas ?is action w\ld close
 ! free/&+ embassy t has be5 locat$ at  
,av5t9e ,hill2 ,:]eas ! ,vatican has    
reque/$ t c\ntries op]ate _! embassies  
to ! ,holy ,see & ,italy 9 two diff]5t  
locations2 ,:]eas s9ce #aihd1 ! ,unit$  
,/ates ,embassy to ! ,holy ,see has be5 
sep>ate f ! ,italian ,embassy :5 ,ronald
 ,reagan & ,pope ,john ,paul ,,ii sign$ 
an accord to e/abli% x2 ,:]eas = ! m ?an
 #gh1jjj1jjj ,ca?olics 9 ! ,unit$ ,/ates
 & _m millions ( o!rs :o value ?is      

relation%ip1 any move t might weak5 ?is 
connection is unacceptable2 ,:]eas hav+ 
bo? ! ,ambassador to ! ,holy ,see & !   
,ambassador to ,rome 9 "o embassy       
comp\nd w likely dim9i% "o ( _! /&+s2   
,:]eas ! ,unit$ ,/ates relation%ip ) !  
,vatican is sep>ate & di/9ct f !        
relation%ip ) ,rome1 a di/9ction t %\ld 
be consi/5tly ma9ta9$2 ,:]eas ?is %\ld  
cont9ue to be ! /&>d t ! ,unit$ ,/ates  
meets2 & ,:]eas simply provid+ a sep>ate
 entrance & address to ! same complex   
fails to recognize ! importance ( ,unit$
 ,/ates-,vatican relations & ?is in/ead 
/rives = ! b>e m9imum3 ,n[1 !re=e1 be x 
,t ,congress opposes ! ,unit$ ,/ates    
,dep>tm5t ( ,/ate ef=ts to close !      
free/&+ ,unit$ ,/ates ,embassy locat$ at
 ,av5t9e ,hill4