,,iv  #aacth ,,congress  #ast ,session  
,h4 ,,con4 ,,res4 #f  ,,in ,,the ,,house
 ,,of ,,representatives  ,january #d1   
#bjac ,ms4 ,kaptur submitted the        
following concurrent resolution2 which  
was referred to the ,committee on the   
,judiciary  ,,concurrent ,,resolution   
,expressing the sense of ,congress that 
the ,supreme ,court misinterpreted the  
,first ,amendment to the ,constitution  
in the case of ,buckley v4 ,valeo4      
,that it is the sense of ,congress that 
the ,supreme ,court misinterpreted the  
,first ,amendment to the ,constitution  
in its decision in the #aigf case of    
,buckley v4 ,valeo because--  7#a7 the  
decision failed to recognize that the   
unlimited spending of large amounts of  
money on elections has a corrosive      
effect on the electoral process not     
simply because of direct transactions   
between those who give large amounts of 
money and candidates and elected        
officials but because the presence of   
unlimited amounts of money corrupts the 

process on a more fundamental level2 and
  7#b7 the decision failed to recognize 
other legitimate state interests which  
justify limiting money in campaigns1    
including the need to preserve the      
integrity of our republican form of     
government1 restore public confidence in
 government1 and ensure all citizens a  
more equal opportunity to participate in
 the political process4