,,iv  #aacth ,,congress  #ast ,session  
,h4 ,,con4 ,,res4 #bd  ,,in ,,the       
,,house ,,of ,,representatives  ,march  
#ad1 #bjac ,mr4 ,scalise 7for himself1  
,mr4 ,aderholt1 ,mrs4 ,bachmann1 ,mr4   
,bachus1 ,mr4 ,barr1 ,mr4 ,barton1 ,mr4 
,bentivolio1 ,mr4 ,bishop of ,utah1     
,mrs4 ,black1 ,mrs4 ,blackburn1 ,mr4    
,brady of ,texas1 ,mr4 ,bridenstine1    
,mr4 ,broun of ,georgia1 ,mr4 ,buchanan1
 ,mr4 ,bucshon1 ,mr4 ,campbell1 ,mr4    
,carter1 ,mr4 ,cassidy1 ,mr4 ,chabot1   
,mr4 ,chaffetz1 ,mr4 ,collins of        
,georgia1 ,mr4 ,cotton1 ,mr4 ,cramer1   
,mr4 ,crawford1 ,mr4 ,culberson1 ,mr4   
,denham1 ,mr4 ,des,jarlais1 ,mr4        
,de,santis1 ,mr4 ,duncan of ,south      
,carolina1 ,mrs4 ,ellmers1 ,mr4         
,farenthold1 ,mr4 ,fincher1 ,mr4        
,fleischmann1 ,mr4 ,fleming1 ,mr4       
,flores1 ,mr4 ,franks of ,arizona1 ,mr4 
,gardner1 ,mr4 ,garrett1 ,mr4 ,gibbs1   
,mr4 ,gingrey of ,georgia1 ,mr4         
,gohmert1 ,mr4 ,gosar1 ,mr4 ,graves of  
,missouri1 ,mr4 ,griffin of ,arkansas1  

,mr4 ,hall1 ,mr4 ,hanna1 ,mr4           
,hensarling1 ,mr4 ,holding1 ,mr4        
,hudson1 ,mr4 ,huelskamp1 ,mr4 ,huizenga
 of ,michigan1 ,mr4 ,issa1 ,ms4         
,jenkins1 ,mr4 ,sam ,johnson of ,texas1 
,mr4 ,jordan1 ,mr4 ,kelly1 ,mr4 ,king of
 ,iowa1 ,mr4 ,kline1 ,mr4 ,la,malfa1    
,mr4 ,lamborn1 ,mr4 ,lankford1 ,mr4     
,latta1 ,mr4 ,long1 ,mr4 ,luetkemeyer1  
,mrs4 ,lummis1 ,mr4 ,massie1 ,mr4       
,mc,clintock1 ,mr4 ,meadows1 ,mr4       
,miller of ,florida1 ,mr4 ,mullin1 ,mr4 
,mulvaney1 ,mrs4 ,noem1 ,mr4            
,neugebauer1 ,mr4 ,nugent1 ,mr4         
,nunnelee1 ,mr4 ,olson1 ,mr4 ,palazzo1  
,mr4 ,pearce1 ,mr4 ,pittenger1 ,mr4     
,pitts1 ,mr4 ,pompeo1 ,mr4 ,posey1 ,mr4 
,price of ,georgia1 ,mr4 ,radel1 ,mr4   
,renacci1 ,mr4 ,ribble1 ,mr4 ,roe of    
,tennessee1 ,mr4 ,rokita1 ,mr4 ,rothfus1
 ,mr4 ,salmon1 ,mr4 ,sessions1 ,mr4     
,shimkus1 ,mr4 ,smith of ,texas1 ,mr4   
,stewart1 ,mr4 ,stivers1 ,mr4 ,stockman1
 ,mr4 ,walberg1 ,mr4 ,weber of ,texas1  
,mr4 ,wenstrup1 ,mr4 ,westmoreland1 ,mr4

 ,williams1 ,mr4 ,wilson of ,south      
,carolina1 ,mr4 ,woodall1 ,mr4 ,yoder1  
and ,mr4 ,young of ,indiana7 submitted  
the following concurrent resolution2    
which was referred to the ,committee on 
,ways and ,means  ,,concurrent          
,,resolution  ,expressing the sense of  
,congress that a carbon tax would be    
detrimental to the ,united ,states      
economy4  ,whereas a carbon tax is a    
,federal tax on carbon released from    
fossil fuels2 ,whereas a carbon tax will
 increase energy prices1 including the  
price of gasoline1 electricity1 natural 
gas1 and home heating oil2 ,whereas a   
carbon tax will mean that families and  
consumers will pay more for essentials  
like food1 gasoline1 and electricity2   
,whereas a carbon tax will fall hardest 
on the poor1 the elderly1 and those on  
fixed incomes2 ,whereas a carbon tax    
will lead to more jobs and businesses   
moving overseas2 ,whereas a carbon tax  
will lead to less economic growth2      
,whereas ,american families will be     

harmed the most from a carbon tax2      
,whereas1 according to the ,energy      
,information ,administration1 in #bjaa1 
fossil fuels share of energy consumption
 was #hb percent2 ,whereas a carbon tax 
will increase the cost of every good    
manufactured in the ,united ,states2    
,whereas a carbon tax will impose       
disproportionate burdens on certain     
industries1 jobs1 ,states1 and          
geographic regions and would further    
restrict the global competitiveness of  
the ,united ,states2 ,whereas ,american 
ingenuity has led to innovations in     
energy exploration and development and  
has increased production of domestic    
energy resources on private and         
,state-owned land which has created     
significant job growth and private      
capital investment2 ,whereas ,united    
,states energy policy should encourage  
continued private sector innovation and 
development and not increase the        
existing tax burden on manufacturers2   
,whereas the production of ,american    

energy resources increases the ,united  
,states ability to maintain a           
competitive advantage in today's global 
economy2 ,whereas a carbon tax would    
reduce ,america's global competitiveness
 and would encourage development abroad 
in countries that do not impose this    
exorbitant tax burden2 and ,whereas the 
,congress and the ,president should     
focus on pro-growth solutions that      
encourage increased development of      
domestic resources3 ,now1 therefore1 be 
it  ,that it is the sense of ,congress  
that a carbon tax would be detrimental  
to ,american families and businesses1   
and is not in the best interest of the  
,united ,states4