,,vedanta ,,philosophy ,,five ,,lectures ,,on ,,reincarnation ,,by ,,swami ,,abhedananda ,author of ,india and her ,people1 ,self-,knowledge1 ,how to be a ,yogi1 ,divine ,heritage of ,man1 etc4 ,,contents ,i4--,,reincarnation ,,ii4--,,heredity ,,and ,,reincarnation ,,iii4--,,evolution ,,and ,,reincarnation ,,iv4--,,which ,,is ,,scientific1 ,,resurrection ,,or ,,reincarnation8 ,v4--,,theory ,,of ,,transmigration ,i4 ,,reincarnation ,the visible phenomena of the universe are bound by the universal law of cause and effect4 ,the effect is visible or perceptible1 while the cause is invisible or imperceptible4 ,the falling of an apple from a tree is the effect of a certain invisible force called gravitation4 ,although the force cannot be perceived by the senses1 its expression is visible4 ,all perceptible phenomena are but the various expressions of different forces which act as invisible agents upon the subtle and imperceptible forms of matter4 ,these invisible agents or forces together with the imperceptible particles of matter make up the subtle states of the phenomenal universe4 ,when a subtle force becomes objectified1 it appears as a gross object4 ,therefore1 we can say1 that every gross form is an expression of some subtle force acting upon the subtle particles of matter4 ,the minute particles of hydrogen and oxygen when combined by chemical force1 appear in the gross form of water4 ,water can never be separated from hydrogen and oxygen1 which are its subtle component parts4 ,its existence depends upon that of its component parts1 or in other words1 upon its subtle form4 ,if the subtle state changes1 the gross manifestation will also change4 ,the peculiarity in the gross form of a plant depends upon the peculiar nature of its subtle form1 the seed4 ,the peculiar nature of the gross forms in the animal kingdom depends upon the subtle forms which manifest variously in each of the intermediate stages between the microscopic unit of living matter and the highest man4 ,the gross human body is closely related to its subtle body4 ,not only this1 but every movement or change in the physical form is caused by the activity and change of the subtle body4 ,if the subtle body be affected or changed a little1 the gross body will also be affected similarly4 ,the material body being the expression of the subtle body1 its birth1 growth1 decay and death depend upon the changes of the subtle body4 ,as long as the subtle body remains1 it will continue to express itself in a corresponding gross form4 ,now let us understand clearly what we mean by a subtle body4 ,it is nothing but a minute germ of a living substance4 ,it contains the invisible particles of matter which are held together by vital force1 and it also possesses mind or thought-force in a potential state1 just as the seed of a plant contains in it the life force and the power of growth4 ,according to ,vedanta1 the subtle body consists of ,antahkaranam1 that is1 the internal organ or the mind substance with its various modifications1 mind1 intellect1 egoism1 memory1 the five instruments of perception3 the powers of seeing1 hearing1 smelling1 tasting and touching2 the five instruments of action1 such as the powers of seizing1 moving1 speaking1 evacuating1 and generating1 and the five ,prnas4 ,prna is a ,sanskrit word which means vital energy or the life-sustaining power in us4 ,although ,prna is one1 it takes five different names on account of the five different functions it performs4 ,this word ,prna includes the five manifestations of the vital force3 ,first1 that power which moves the lungs and draws the atmospheric air from outside into the system4 ,this is also called ,prna4 ,second1 that power which throws out of the system such things as are not wanted4 ,it is called in ,sanskrit ,apna4 ,third1 it takes the name of ,samna1 as performing digestive functions and carrying the extract of food to every part of the body4 ,it is called ,udna when it is the cause of bringing down food from the mouth through the alimentary canal to the stomach1 and also when it is the cause of the power of speech4 ,the fifth power of ,prna is that which works in every part of the nervous system from head to foot1 through every canal1 which keeps the shape of the body1 preserves it from putrefaction1 and gives health and life to every cell and organ4 ,these are the various manifestations of the vital force or ,prna4 ,these subtle powers together with the non-composite elements of the gross body1 or the ethereal particles of subtle matter1 and also with the potentialities of all the impressions1 ideas and tendencies which each individual gathers in one life1 make up his subtle body4 ,as a resultant of all the different actions of mind and body which an individual performs in his present life1 will be the tendencies and desires in his future life2 nothing will be lost4 ,every action of body or mind which we do1 every thought which we think1 becomes fine1 and is stored up in the form of a ,samskra or impression in our minds4 ,it remains latent for some time1 and then it rises up in the form of a mental wave and produces new desires4 ,these desires are called in ,vedanta1 ,vsans4 ,vsans or strong desires are the manufacturers of new bodies4 ,if ,vsan or longing for worldly pleasures and objects remains in anybody1 even after hundreds of births1 that person will be born again4 ,nothing can prevent the course of strong desires4 ,desires must be fulfilled sooner or later4 ,every voluntary or involuntary action of the body1 sense or mind must correspond to the dormant impressions stored up in the subtle body4 ,although growth1 the process of nourishment and all the changes of the gross physical body take place according to the necessarily acting causes1 yet the whole series of actions1 and consequently every individual act1 the condition of the body which accomplishes it1 nay1 the whole process in and through which the body exists1 are nothing but the outward expressions of the latent impressions stored up in the subtle body4 ,upon these rests the perfect suitableness of the animal or human body to the animal or human nature of one's impressions4 ,the organs of the senses must therefore completely correspond to the principal desires which are the strongest and most ready to manifest4 ,they are the visible expressions of these desires4 ,if there be no hunger or desire to eat1 teeth1 throat and bowels will be of no use4 ,if there be no desire for grasping and moving1 hands and legs will be useless4 ,similarly it can be shown that the desire for seeing1 hearing1 etc41 has produced the eye1 ear1 etc4 ,if ,i have no desire to use my hand1 and if ,i do not use it at all1 within a few months it will wither away and die4 ,in ,india there are some religious fanatics who hold up their arms and do not use them at all2 after a few months their arms wither and become stiff and dead4 ,a person who lies on his back for six months loses the power of walking4 ,there are many such instances which prove the injurious effects of the disuse of our limbs and organs4 ,as the human form1 generally1 corresponds to the human will1 generally1 so the individual bodily structure corresponds to the character1 desires1 will and thought of the individual4 ,therefore the outer nature is nothing but the expression of the inner nature4 ,this inner nature of each individual is what re-incarnates or expresses itself successively in various forms1 one after another4 ,when a man dies the individual ego or ,jva 7as it is called in ,sanskrit71 which means the germ of life or the living soul of man1 is not destroyed1 but it continues to exist in an invisible form4 ,it remains like a permanent thread stringing together the separate lives by the law of cause and effect4 ,the subtle body is like a water-globule which sprang in the beginningless past from the eternal ocean of ,reality2 and it contains the reflection of the unchangeable light of ,intelligence4 ,as a water-globule remains sometimes in an invisible vapory state in a cloud1 then in rain or snow or ice1 and again as steam or in mud1 but is never destroyed1 so the subtle body sometimes remains unmanifested and sometimes expresses itself in gross forms of animal or human beings1 according to the desires and tendencies that are ready to manifest4 ,it may go to heaven1 that is1 to some other planet1 or it may be born again on this earth4 ,it depends on the nature and strength of one's life-long tendency and bent of mind4 ,this idea is clearly expressed in ,vedanta4 ,the thought1 will or desire which is extremely strong during lifetime1 will become predominant at the time of death and will mould the inner nature of the dying person4 ,the newly moulded inner nature will express in a new form4 7,bhagavad ,gt47 ,the thought1 will or desire which moulds the inner nature has the power of selecting or attracting such conditions or environments as will help it in its way of manifestation4 ,this process corresponds in some respects to the law of natural selection4 ,we shall be better able to understand that process by studying how the seeds of different trees select from the common environments different materials1 and absorb and assimilate different quantities of elements4 ,suppose two seeds1 one of an oak and the other of a chestnut1 are planted in a pot4 ,the power of growth in both the seeds is of the same nature4 ,the environments1 earth1 water1 heat and light are the same4 ,but still there is some peculiarity in each of the seeds1 which will absorb from the common environments different quantities of elements and other properties which are fit to help the growth of the peculiar nature and form of the fruit1 flower1 leaves of each tree4 ,suppose the chestnut is a horse-chestnut4 ,if1 under different conditions1 the peculiar nature of the horse-chestnut changes into that of a sweet chestnut1 then1 along with the changes in the seed1 the whole nature of the tree1 leaves1 fruits will also be changed4 ,it will no more attract1 absorb or assimilate those substances and qualities of the environments which it did when it was a horse-chestnut4 ,similarly1 through the law of natural selection the newly moulded thought-body of the dying person will choose and attract such parts from the common environments as are helpful to its proper expression or manifestation4 ,parents are nothing but the principal parts of the environment of the re-incarnating individual4 ,the newly moulded inner nature or subtle body of the individual will by the law of natural selection involuntarily choose1 or be unconsciously drawn to1 as it were1 its suitable parents and will be born of them4 ,as1 for instance1 if ,i have a strong desire to become an artist1 and if after a life-long struggle ,i do not succeed in being the greatest1 after the death of the body ,i will be born of such parents and with such environments as will help me to become the best artist4 ,the whole process is expressed in ,eastern philosophy by the doctrine of the ,reincarnation of the individual soul4 ,although this doctrine is commonly rejected in the ,west1 it is unreservedly accepted by the vast majority of mankind of the present day1 as it was in past centuries4 ,the scientific explanation of this theory we find nowhere except in the writings of the ,hindus2 still we know that from very ancient times it was believed by the philosophers1 sages and prophets of different countries4 ,the ancient civilization of ,egypt was built upon a crude form of the doctrine of ,reincarnation4 ,herodotus says3 ,the ,egyptians propounded the theory that the human soul is imperishable1 and that where the body of any one dies it enters into some other creature that may be ready to receive it4 ,pythagoras and his disciples spread it through ,greece and ,italy4 ,pythagoras says3 ,all has soul2 all is soul wandering in the organic world1 and obeying eternal will or law4 ,in ,dryden's ,ovid we read3-- ,death has no power the immortal soul to slay1 ,that1 when its present body turns to clay1 ,seeks a fresh home1 and with unlessened might ,inspires another frame with life and light4 ,it was the keynote of ,plato's philosophy4 ,plato says3 ,soul is older than body4 ,souls are continually born over again into this life4 ,the idea of ,reincarnation was spread widely in ,greece and ,italy by ,pythagoras1 ,empedocles1 ,plato1 ,virgil and ,ovid4 ,it was known to the ,neo-,platonists1 ,plotinus and ,proclus4 ,plotinus says3 ,the soul leaving the body becomes that power which it has most developed4 ,let us fly then from here below and rise to the intellectual world1 that we may not fall into a purely sensible life by allowing ourselves to follow sensible images4444 ,it was the fundamental principle of the religion of the ,persian ,magi4 ,alexander the ,great accepted this idea after coming in contact with the ,hindu philosophers4 ,julius ,caesar found that the ,gauls had some belief regarding the pre-existence of the human soul4 ,the ,druids of old ,gaul believed that the souls of men transmigrate into those bodies whose habits and characters they most resemble4 ,celts and ,britons were impressed with this idea4 ,it was a favorite theme of the ,arab philosophers and many ,mahomedan ,sufis4 ,the ,jews adopted it after the ,babylonian captivity4 ,philo of ,alexandria1 who was a contemporary of ,christ1 preached amongst the ,hebrews the ,platonic idea of the pre-existence and rebirth of human souls4 ,philo says3 ,the company of disembodied souls is distributed in various orders4 ,the law of some of them is to enter mortal bodies1 and after certain prescribed periods be again set free4 ,john the ,baptist was according to the ,jews a second ,elijah2 ,jesus was believed by many to be the re-appearance of some other prophet4 7,see ,matt1 xvi1 #ad1 also xvii1 #ab47 ,solomon says in his ,book of ,wisdom3 ,i was a child of good nature and a good soul came to me1 or rather because ,i was good ,i came into an undefiled body4 ,the ,talmud and ,cabala teach the same thing4 ,in the ,talmud it is said that ,abel's soul passed into the body of ,seth1 and then into that of ,moses4 ,along with the spread of the ,cabala this doctrine 7which was known as ,transmigration and ,metempsychosis7 began to take root in ,judaism and then it gained believers even among men who were little inclined towards ,mysticism4 ,juda ben ,asher 7,asheri7 for instance1 discussing this doctrine in a letter to his father endeavored to place it upon a philosophical basis4 7,jewish ,encyclopedia1 ,vol4 ,,xii1 p4 #bcb47 ,we also read1 ,the ,cabalists eagerly adopted the doctrine on account of the vast field it offered to mystic speculations4 ,moreover it was almost a necessary corollary of their psychological system4 ,the absolute condition of the soul is1 according to them1 its return1 after developing all those perfections1 the germs of which are eternally implanted in it1 to the ,infinite ,source from which it emanated4 ,another term of life must therefore be vouchsafed to those souls which have not fulfilled their destiny here below1 and have not been sufficiently purified for the state of union with the ,primordial ,cause4 ,hence if the soul1 on its first assumption of a human body and sojourn on earth1 fails to acquire that experience for which it descended from heaven and becomes contaminated by that which is polluting1 it must reinhabit a body till it is able to ascend in a purified state through repeated trials4 ,this is the theory of the ,zohar1 which says3 ,all souls are subject to transmigration2 and men do not know the ways of the ,holy ,one1 blessed be ,he6 ,they do not know that they are brought before the tribunal both before they enter into this world and after they leave it2 they are ignorant of the many transmigrations and secret probations which they have to undergo1 and of the number of souls and spirits which enter into this world and which do not return to the palace of the ,heavenly ,king4 ,men do not know how the souls revolve like a stone which is thrown from a sling4 ,but the time is at hand when these mysteries will be disclosed4 7,zohar1 ,,ii1 #ii b47 ,like many of the ,church ,fathers the ,cabalists used as their main argument in favor of the doctrine of metempsychosis the justice of ,god4 ,but for the belief in metempsychosis1 they maintained1 the question why ,god often permits the wicked to lead a happy life while many righteous are miserable would be unanswerable4 ,then too the infliction of pain upon children would be an act of cruelty unless it is imposed in punishment of sin committed by the soul in a previous state4 ,isaac ,abravanel sees in the commandment of the ,levirate a proof of the doctrine of metempsychosis for which he gives the following reasons3 7#a7 ,god in ,his mercy willed that another trial should be given to the soul1 which having yielded to the sanguine temperament of the body had committed a capital sin1 such as murder1 adultery1 etc42 7#b7 it is only just that when a man dies young a chance should be given to his soul to execute in another body the good deeds which it had not time to perform in the first body2 7#c7 the soul of the wicked sometimes passes into another body in order to receive its deserved punishment here below instead of in the other world where it would be much more severe4 7,commentary on ,deuteronomy1 ,,xxv1 #e47 ,christianity is not exempt from this idea4 ,origen and other ,church ,fathers believed in it4 ,origen says3 ,for ,god1 justly disposing of his creatures according to their desert1 united the diversities of minds in one congruous world1 that he might1 as it were1 adorn his mansion 7in which ought to be not only vases of gold and silver1 but of wood also and clay1 and some to honor and some to dishonor7 with these diverse vases1 minds or souls4 ,to these causes the world owes its diversity1 while ,divine ,providence disposes each according to his tendency1 mind and disposition4 ,he also says3 ,i think this is a question how it happens that the human mind is influenced now by the good1 now by the evil4 ,the causes of this ,i suspect to be more ancient than this corporeal birth4 ,the idea of ,reincarnation spread so fast amongst the early ,christians that ,justinian was obliged to suppress it by passing a law in the ,council of ,constantinople in #ech ,a4,d4 ,the law was this3 ,whoever shall support the mythical presentation of the pre-existence of the soul1 and the consequently wonderful opinion of its return1 let him be ,anathema4 ,the ,gnostics and ,manichaeans propagated the tenets of ,reincarnation amongst the mediaeval sects such as the ,bogomiles and ,paulicians4 ,some of the followers of this so-called erroneous belief were cruelly persecuted in #che ,a4,d4 ,in the seventeenth century some of the ,cambridge ,platonists1 as ,dr4 ,henry ,more and others1 accepted the idea of rebirth4 ,most of the ,german philosophers of the middle ages and of recent days have advocated and upheld this doctrine4 ,many quotations can be given from the writings of great thinkers1 like ,kant1 ,scotus1 ,schelling1 ,fichte1 ,leibnitz1 ,schopenhauer1 ,giardano ,bruno1 ,goethe1 ,lessing1 ,herder and a host of others4 ,the great skeptic ,hume says in his posthumous essay on ,the ,immortality of the ,soul1 ,the metempsychosis is therefore the only system of this kind that philosophy can hearken to4 ,scientists like ,flammarion and ,huxley have supported this doctrine of ,reincarnation4 ,professor ,huxley says3 ,none but hasty thinkers will reject it on the ground of inherent absurdity4 ,like the doctrine of evolution itself1 that of transmigration has its roots in the world of reality4 7,evolution and ,ethics1 p4 #fa47 ,some of the theological leaders have preached it4 ,the eminent ,german theologian ,dr4 ,julius ,mller supports this theory in his work on ,the ,christian ,doctrine of ,sin4 ,prominent theologians1 such as ,dr4 ,dorner1 ,ernesti1 ,rckert1 ,edward ,beecher1 ,henry ,ward ,beecher1 ,phillips ,brooks1 preached many a time touching the question of the pre-existence and rebirth of the individual soul4 ,swedenborg and ,emerson maintained it4 ,emerson says in his essay on ,experience1 ,we wake and find ourselves on a stair4 ,there are stairs below us which we seem to have ascended2 there are stairs above us1 many a one1 which go upward and out of sight4 ,almost all of the poets1 ancient or modern1 profess it4 ,william ,wordsworth says in ,intimations of ,immortality3-- ,the soul that rises with us1 our life's star1 ,hath had elsewhere its setting1 ,and cometh from afar4 ,tennyson writes in the ,two ,voices2 ,or1 if through lower lives ,i came-- ,tho' all experience past became1 ,consolidate in mind and frame-- ,i might forget my weaker lot2 ,for is not our first year forgot8 ,the haunts of memory echo not4 ,walt ,whitman says in ,leaves of ,grass3 ,as to you1 ,life1 ,i reckon you are the leavings of many deaths1 ,no doubt ,i have died myself ten thousand times before4 ,similar passages can be quoted from almost all the poets of different countries4 ,even amongst the aboriginal tribes of ,africa1 ,asia1 ,north and ,south ,america1 traces of this belief in the rebirth of souls is to be found4 ,nearly three-fourths of the population of ,asia believe in the doctrine of ,reincarnation1 and through it they find a satisfactory explanation of the problem of life4 ,there is no religion which denies the continuity of the individual soul after death4 ,those who do not believe in ,reincarnation try to explain the world of inequalities and diversities either by the one-birth theory or by the theory of hereditary transmission4 ,neither of these theories1 however1 is sufficient to explain the inequalities that we meet with in our everyday life4 ,those who believe in the one-birth theory1 that we have come here for the first and last time1 do not understand that the acquirement of wisdom and experience is the purpose of human life2 nor can they explain why children who die young should come into existence and pass away without getting the opportunity to learn anything or what purpose is served by their coming thus for a few days1 remaining in utter ignorance and then passing away without gaining anything whatever4 ,the ,christian dogma1 based on the one-birth theory1 tells us that the child which dies soon after its birth is sure to be saved and will enjoy eternal life and everlasting happiness in heaven4 ,the ,christians who really believe in this dogma ought to pray to their heavenly ,father for the death of their children immediately after their birth and ought to thank the merciful ,father when the grave closes over their little forms4 ,thus the one-birth theory of ,christian theology does not remove any difficulty4 ,two great religions1 ,judaism with its two offspring--,christianity and ,mahomedanism--and ,zoroastrianism1 still uphold the one-birth theory4 ,the followers of these1 shutting their eyes to the absurdity and unreasonableness of such a theory1 believe that human souls are created out of nothing at the time of the birth of their bodies and that they continue to exist throughout eternity either to suffer or to enjoy because of the deeds performed during the short period of their earthly existence4 ,here the question arises why should a man be held responsible throughout eternity for the works which he was forced or predestined to perform by the will of the ,lord of the universe8 ,the theory of predestination and grace1 instead of explaining the difficulty1 makes ,god partial and unjust4 ,if the omnipotent personal ,god created human souls out of nothing1 could ,he not make all souls equally good and happy8 ,why does ,he make one to enjoy all the blessings of life and another to suffer all miseries throughout eternity8 ,why is one born with good tendencies and another with evil ones8 ,why is one man virtuous throughout his life and another bestial8 ,why is one born intelligent and another idiotic8 ,if ,god out of ,his own will made all these inequalities1 or1 in other words1 if ,god created one man to suffer and another to enjoy1 then how partial and unjust must ,he be6 ,he must be worse than a tyrant4 ,how can we worship ,him1 how call ,him just and merciful8 ,some people try to save ,god from this charge of partiality and injustice by saying that all good things of this universe are the work of ,god1 and all evil things are the work of a demon or ,satan4 ,god created everything good1 but it was ,satan who brought evil into this world and made everything bad4 ,now let us see how far such a statement is logically correct4 ,good and evil are two relative terms2 the existence of one depends upon that of the other4 ,good cannot exist without evil1 and evil cannot exist without being related to good4 ,when ,god created what we call good1 ,he must have created evil at the same time1 otherwise ,he could not create good alone4 ,if the creator of evil1 call him by whatever name you like1 had brought evil into this world1 he must have created it simultaneously with ,god2 otherwise it would have been impossible for ,god to create good1 which can exist only as related to evil4 ,as such they will have to admit that the ,creators of good and evil sat together at the same time to create this world1 which is a mixture of good and evil4 ,consequently1 both of them are equally powerful1 and limited by each other4 ,therefore neither of them is infinite in powers or omnipotent4 ,so we cannot say that the ,almighty ,god of the universe created good alone and not the evil4 ,another argument which the ,vedantists advance in support of the theory of ,reincarnation is that ,nothing is destroyed in the universe4 ,destruction in the sense of the annihilation of a thing is unknown to the ,vedantic philosophers1 just as it is unknown to the modern scientists4 ,they say non-existence can never become existence and existence can never become non-existence2 or1 in other words1 that which did not exist can never exist1 and conversely that which exists in any form can never become non-existent4 ,this is the law of nature4 ,as such1 the impressions or ideas which we now have1 together with the powers which we possess1 will not be destroyed but will remain with us in some form or other4 ,our bodies may change1 but the powers1 ,karma1 ,samskaras or impressions and the materials which manufactured our bodies must remain in us in an unmanifested form4 ,they will never be destroyed4 ,again science tells us that that which remains in an unmanifested or potential state must at some time or other be manifested in a kinetic or actual form4 ,therefore we shall get other bodies1 sooner or later4 ,it is for this reason said in the ,bhagavad ,gt3 ,birth must be followed by death and death must be followed by birth4 ,such a continuously recurring series of births and deaths each germ of life must go through4 ,another consideration is that the beginning1 ending and continuing are conceptions of the human mind2 their significance depends entirely upon our conception of time4 ,but we all know that time has no absolute existence4 ,it is merely a form of our knowledge of our own existence in relation to that of nature4 ,the conception of time vanishes at the sleep of death1 just as it does every night when we are in sound sleep4 ,death resembles the state of our sound sleep4 ,the soul wakes up from the sleep of death just in the same manner as the insects awake in spring after sleeping the long and rigid winter-sleep1 as a chrysalis in the bed of a cocoon spun by itself in autumn4 ,nature teaches us the great lesson of rebirth and the similarity between sleep and death by the rejuvenation of the chrysalis in the spring4 ,after death the soul wakes up and puts on or manufactures the garment of a new body1 just in the same manner as we put on new clothes after throwing away the old and worn-out ones4 ,thus the soul continues to manifest itself over and over again either on the human or any other plane of existence1 being bound by the ,law of ,karma or of ,cause and ,sequence4 ,death1 so called1 is but older matter dressed ,in some new form4 ,and in a varied vest1 ,from tenement to tenement though tossed1 ,the soul is still the same1 the figure only lost4 ,poem on ,pythagoras1 ,dryden's ,ovid4 ,here it may be asked1 if we existed before our birth why do we not remember8 ,this is one of the strongest objections often raised against the belief in pre-existence4 ,some people deny the existence of the soul in the past simply because they cannot remember the events of their past4 ,others1 again1 who hold memory as the standard of existence1 say1 if our memory of the present ceases to exist at the time of death1 with it we shall also cease to be2 we cannot be immortal2 because they hold that memory is the standard of life1 and if we do not remember then we are not the same beings4 ,vedanta answers these questions by saying that it is possible for us to remember our previous existences4 ,those who have read ,raja ,yoga will recall that in the #ahth aphorism of the third chapter it is said3 ,by perceiving the ,samskras one acquires the knowledge of past lives4 ,here the ,samskras mean the impressions of the past experience which lie dormant in our subliminal self1 and are never lost4 ,memory is nothing but the awakening and rising of latent impressions above the threshold of consciousness4 ,a ,raja ,yogi1 through powerful concentration upon these dormant impressions of the subconscious mind1 can remember all the events of his past lives4 ,there have been many instances in ,india of ,yogis who could know not only their own past lives but correctly tell those of others4 ,it is said that ,buddha remembered five hundred of his previous births4 ,our subliminal self1 or the subconscious mind1 is the storehouse of all the impressions that we gather through our experiences during our lifetime4 ,they are stored up1 pigeon-holed there1 in the ,chitta1 as it is called in ,vedanta4 ,chitta means the same subconscious mind or subliminal self which is the storehouse of all impressions and experiences4 ,and these impressions remain latent until favorable conditions rouse them and bring them out on the plane of consciousness4 ,here let us take an illustration3 ,in a dark room pictures are thrown on a screen by lantern-slides4 ,the room is absolutely dark4 ,we are looking at the pictures4 ,suppose we open a window and allow the rays of the midday sun to fall upon the screen4 ,would we be able to see those pictures8 ,no4 ,why8 ,because the more powerful flood of light will subdue the light of the lantern and the pictures4 ,but although they are invisible to our eyes we cannot deny their existence on the screen4 ,similarly1 the pictures of the events of our previous lives upon the screen of the subliminal self may be invisible to us at present1 but they exist there4 ,why are they invisible to us now8 ,because the more powerful light of sense-consciousness has subdued them4 ,if we close the windows and doors of our senses from outside contact and darken the inner chamber of our self1 then by focusing the light of consciousness and concentrating the mental rays we shall be able to know and remember our past lives1 and all the events and experiences thereof4 ,those who wish therefore to develop their memory and remember their past should practice ,raja ,yoga and learn the method of acquiring the power of concentration by shutting the doors and windows of their senses4 ,and that power of concentration must be helped by the power of self-control4 ,that is1 by controlling the doors and windows of our own senses4 ,these dormant impressions1 whether we remember them or not1 are the chief factors in moulding our individual characters with which we are born1 and they are the causes of the inequalities and diversities which we find around us4 ,when we study the characters and powers of geniuses and prodigies we cannot deny the pre-existence of the soul4 ,whatever the soul has mastered in a previous life manifests in the present4 ,the memory of particular events is not so important4 ,if we possess the wisdom and knowledge which we gathered in our previous lives1 then it matters very little whether or not we remember the particular events1 or the struggles which we went through in order to gain that knowledge4 ,those particular things may not come to us in our memory1 but we have not lost the wisdom4 ,now1 study your own present life and you will see that in this life you have gained some experience4 ,the particular events and the struggles which you went through are passing out of your memory1 but the experience1 the knowledge which you have gained through that experience1 has moulded your character1 has shaped you in a different manner4 ,you will not have to go through those different events again to remember2 how you acquired that experience is not necessary2 the wisdom gained is quite enough4 ,then1 again1 we find among ourselves persons who are born with some wonderful powers4 ,take1 for instance1 the power of self-control4 ,one is born with the power of self-control highly developed1 and that self-control may not be acquired by another after years of hard struggle4 ,why is there this difference8 ,bhagavan ,sri ,ramakrishna was born with ,god-consciousness1 and he went into the highest state of ,samdhi when he was four years old2 but this state is very difficult for other ,yogis to acquire4 ,there was a ,yogi who came to see ,ramakrishna4 ,he was an old man and possessed wonderful powers1 and he said3 ,i have struggled for forty years to acquire that state which is natural with you4 ,there are many such instances which show that pre-existence is a fact1 and that these latent or dormant impressions of previous lives are the chief factors in moulding the individual character without depending upon the memory of the past4 ,because we cannot remember our past1 because of the loss of memory of the particular events1 the soul's progress is not arrested4 ,the soul will continue to progress further and further1 even though the memory may be weak4 ,each individual soul possesses this storehouse of previous experiences in the background1 in the subconscious mind4 ,take the instance of two lovers4 ,what is love8 ,it is the attraction between two souls4 ,this love does not die with the death of the body4 ,true love survives death and continues to grow1 to become stronger and stronger4 ,eventually it brings the two souls together and makes them one4 ,the theory of pre-existence alone can explain why two souls at first sight know each other and become attached to each other by the tie of friendship4 ,this mutual love will continue to grow and will become stronger1 and in the end will bring these lovers together1 no matter where they go4 ,therefore1 ,vedanta does not say that the death of the body will end the attraction or the attachment of two souls2 but as the souls are immortal so their relation will continue forever4 ,the ,yogis know how to develop memory and how to read past lives4 ,they say1 time and space exist in relation to our present mental condition2 if we can rise above this plane1 our higher mind sees the past and future just as we see things before our eyes4 ,those who wish to satisfy the idle curiosity of their minds may spend their energy by trying to recollect their past lives4 ,but ,i think it will be much more helpful to us if we devote our time and energy in moulding our future and in trying to be better than we are now1 because the recollection of our former condition would only force us to make a bad use of the present4 ,how unhappy he must be who knows that the wicked deeds of his past life will surely react on him and will bring distress1 misery1 unhappiness or suffering within a few days or a few months4 ,such a man would be so restless and unhappy that he would not be able to do any work properly2 he would constantly think in what form misery would appear to him4 ,he would not be able to eat or even sleep4 ,he would be most miserable4 ,therefore we ought to regard it as a great blessing that we do not recollect our past lives and past deeds4 ,vedanta says1 do not waste your valuable time in thinking of your past lives1 do not look backward during the tiresome journey through the different stages of evolution1 always look forward and try first to attain to the highest point of spiritual development2 then if you want to know your past lives you will recollect them all4 ,nothing will remain unknown to you1 the ,knower of the universe4 ,when the all-knowing ,divine ,self will manifest through you1 time and space will vanish and past and future will be changed into the eternal present4 ,then you will say as ,sri ,krishna said to ,arjuna1 in the ,bhagavad ,gita3 ,both you and ,i have passed through many lives2 you do not recollect any1 but ,i know them all4 7,ch4 iv41 #e47 ,,ii4 ,,heredity ,,and ,,reincarnation4 ,those who accept the theory of heredity deny the existence of the human soul as an entity separable from the gross physical organism4 ,consequently they do not discuss the question whether the individual soul existed in the past or will continue to exist after the death of the body4 ,this kind of question does not disturb their minds4 ,they generally maintain that the individual soul is inseparable from the body or the brain or nervous system2 consequently what we call soul or the conscious entity or the thinker is produced along with the birth of the organism or brain1 lasts as long as the body lasts and dies when the organism is dissolved into its elements4 ,but those1 on the other hand1 who accept the theory of ,reincarnation admit the existence of soul as a conscious entity which is independent of the physical organism1 that it continues to live after death and that it existed before the birth of the body4 ,the theory of heredity has always been supported by the materialistic scientists1 atheists and agnostics of all ages and also by those who believe in the special creation of the first man and woman at a certain definite time and that their qualities1 character1 life and soul have been transmitted to all humanity through successive generations4 ,the commonly accepted meaning of the theory of heredity is that all the well-marked peculiarities1 both physical and mental1 in the parents are handed on to the children2 or1 in other words1 heredity is that property of an organism by which its peculiar nature is transmitted to its descendants4 ,in the whole history of humanity there has never been a time when this question of heredity has been discussed so minutely and in so many different ways as it has been in the present century4 ,although this theory was known in the ,east by the ancient ,vedanta philosophers1 by the ,buddhists of the pre-,christian era and by the ,greek philosophers in the ,west1 still it has received a new impetus and has grown with new strength since the introduction of the ,darwinian theory of the evolution of species4 ,along with the latest discoveries in physiology1 biology1 embryology and other branches of modern science1 the popular simple meaning of heredity--that the offspring not only resemble their parents among animals as well as among men1 but inherit all the individual peculiarities1 life and character of their parents--has taken the shape of the most complicated and difficult problem which it is almost impossible to solve4 ,our minds are no longer satisfied with ,haeckel's definition that heredity is simply an overgrowth of the individual1 a simple continuity of growth2 but we want to know the particular method by which hereditary transmission takes place4 ,we ask1 how can a single cell reproduce the whole body of the offspring1 its mind1 character and all the peculiarities of an organism8 ,out of the myriads of cells of which a body is composed1 what kind of cell is that which possesses the power of reproducing the peculiarities1 both mental and physical1 which are to be found in the form of the new-born babe8 ,this is the most puzzling of all the problems which the scientific mind has ever encountered4 ,the fundamental question connected with the theory of heredity is3 ,how can a single cell of the body contain within itself all the hereditary tendencies of the hypothesis of the continuity of the germ-plasm gives an identical starting-point to each successive generation1 and thus explains how it is that an identical product arises from all of them4 ,in other words1 the hypothesis explains heredity as part of the underlying problems of assimilation and of the causes which act directly during ontogeny4 7,vol4 ,i1 p4 #agj47 ,according to ,weismann1 all the peculiarities which we find in an organism are not inherited by the organism from that of the parents1 but he says3 ,nothing can arise in an organism unless the predisposition to it is pre-existent1 for every acquired character is simply the reaction of the organism upon a certain stimulus4 7,vol4 ,i1 p4 #agb47 ,therefore the germ-cells do not inherit all the peculiarities of the parents1 but possess the predisposition or a potentiality of the tendencies which gradually develop into individual characters4 ,we will be able to understand his theory better from the following quotations1 which give his own words4 ,he says3 ,i have called this substance 'germ-plasm1' and have assumed that it possesses a highly complex structure1 conferring upon it the power of developing into a complex organism4 7,heredity1 ,vol4 ,i1 p4 #agj47 ,again he says3 ,there is1 therefore1 continuity of the germ-plasm from one generation to another4 ,one might represent the germ-plasm by the metaphor of a long1 creeping rootstock from which plants arise at intervals1 these latter representing the individuals of successive generations4 ,hence it follows that the transmission of acquired characters is an impossibility1 for if the germ-plasm is not formed anew in each individual1 but is derived from that which preceded it1 its structure1 and1 above all1 its molecular constitution1 cannot depend upon the individual in which it happens to occur1 but such an individual only forms1 as it were1 the nutritive soil at the expense of which the germ-plasm grows1 while the latter possessed its characteristic structure from the beginning1 viz41 before the commencement of growth4 ,but the tendencies of heredity1 of which the germ-plasm is the bearer1 depend upon this very molecular structure1 and hence only those characters can be transmitted through successive generations which have been previously inherited1 viz41 those characters which were potentially contained in the structure of the germ-plasm4 ,it also follows that those other characters which have been acquired by the influence of special external conditions1 during the lifetime of the parent1 cannot be transmitted at all4 7,vol4 ,i1 p4 #bgc47 ,in conclusion1 ,weismann writes3 ,but at all events we have gained this much1 that the only facts which appear to directly prove a transmission of acquired characters have been refuted1 and that the only firm foundation on which this hypothesis has been hitherto based has been destroyed47,vol4 ,i1 p4 #dfa47 ,thus we see how far the theory of heredity has been pushed by the great scientific investigators of the present age4 ,we have no longer any right to believe in the old oft-refuted hypothesis which assumes that each individual organism produces germ-cells afresh again and again and transmits all its powers developed and acquired by the parents2 but1 on the contrary1 we have come to know to-day that parents are nothing but mere channels through which these germ-plasms or germ-cells manifest their peculiar tendencies and powers which existed in them from the very beginning4 ,the main point is that the germs are not created by the parents1 but that they existed in previous generations4 ,now1 what are those germs like8 ,wherefrom do they acquire these tendencies1 these peculiarities8 ,that is another very difficult problem4 ,dr4 ,weismann and his followers say that these peculiarities are gained or inherited from the common stock1 but what that common stock is they do not explain4 ,where is that common stock and why will certain germs acquire certain tendencies and other germs retain other peculiarities8 ,what regulates them8 ,these questions are not solved4 ,so far we have gathered from ,dr4 ,weismann's explanation that the parents are not the creators of the germs but1 on the contrary1 that the germs existed before the birth of the body1 before the growth of the body1 in previous generations1 or in the common stock of the universe4 ,the previous generations are dead and gone1 so we may say that they existed in the universe4 ,we cannot now believe the old1 crude1 often-refuted idea that ,god creates the germ at the time of birth and puts into it all the powers and peculiarities of the parents4 ,this theory makes ,god unjust and partial1 so it does not appeal to us any more4 ,we need better and more rational explanations4 ,the one-birth theory1 which has been preached by ,christian ministers and other religionists for so many years1 does not remove the difficulties1 does not explain the cause of the inequalities and diversities1 does not answer the question whether we acquire all the tendencies and peculiarities of the parents or whether acquired characters cannot be transmitted4 ,we have already seen that these questions are left unsolved by the one-birth theory of ,christianity and of ,judaism4 ,but this theory of continuity of the germ-plasm pushes the question of heredity to the door of ,reincarnation4 ,if modern science can explain what that common stock is and why and how these germs retain those peculiarities and tendencies1 then the answer will be complete and not until then4 ,the ,vedanta philosophy1 however1 has already explained the cause of the potentiality in the germ of life or germ-plasm or germ-cell4 ,vedanta solves this difficulty by saying that each of these germ-plasms or germ-cells is nothing but the subtle form of a reincarnating individual1 containing potentially all the experiences1 characters1 tendencies1 and desires which one had in one's previous life4 ,it existed before the birth of the body and it will continue after the death of the body4 ,this germ or subtle body is not the same as the astral body of the ,theosophists1 or the double of the metaphysical thinkers or the disembodied spirit of the ,spiritualists2 but it is an ethereal center of activity-physical1 mental and organic4 ,it is a center which possesses the tendency to manifest these powers on different planes of existence4 ,it contains the minute particles of matter or ethereal substance and the life principle or vital energy by which we live and move4 ,it also possesses the mental powers and sense powers2 but all these remain latent1 just as in a seed we see that the powers of growth1 of assimilation and of producing flowers and fruits are latent4 ,at the time of death the individual soul contracts and remains in the form of a germ of life4 ,it is for this reason1 ,vedanta teaches1 that it is neither the will of ,god nor the fault of the parents that forms the characters of children1 but each child is responsible for its tendencies1 capacities1 powers and character4 ,it is its own ,karma or past actions that make a child a murderer or a saint1 virtuous or sinful4 ,the stored-up potentialities in a subtle body manifest in the character of an individual4 ,the argument advanced by the supporters of the theory of hereditary transmission does not furnish a satisfactory explanation of the cause of the inequalities and diversities of the universe4 ,why is it that the children of the same parents show a marked dissimilarity to their parents and to each other8 ,why do twins develop into dissimilar characters and possess opposite qualities1 although they are born of the same parents at the same time and brought up under similar conditions and environments8 ,how can heredity explain such cases8 ,suppose a man has five children2 one is honest and saintly1 another is an idiot1 the third becomes a murderer1 the fourth a genius or prodigy1 and the fifth a cripple and diseased4 ,who made these dissimilarities8 ,they cannot be accidents4 ,there is no such thing as an accident4 ,every event of the universe is bound by the law of cause and effect4 ,there must be some cause of these inequalities4 ,who made one honest and saintly1 another an idiot1 and so forth8 ,parents8 ,that cannot be4 ,they never dreamed that they would beget a murderer or a villain or an idiot4 ,on the contrary1 all parents wish their children to be the best and happiest4 ,but in spite of such desires they get such children4 ,why8 ,what is the cause8 ,does the theory of heredity explain it8 ,no1 not at all4 ,suppose a man1 twenty-four years old1 who has certain traits1 like musical or artistic talents1 such as painting and so on1 has a crooked nose and other peculiarities1 like cross-eyes1 which resemble those of his grandfather4 ,suppose his grandfather died six years before he was born4 ,now1 those who believe in the theory of heredity will say that this young man inherited all these peculiarities from his grandfather4 ,when did he inherit8 ,his grandfather had died six years before he was born4 ,he inherited1 of course1 in the form of that germ4 ,what is that germ like8 ,a minute protoplasm1 a jelly-like substance1 and if you examine it with a powerful microscope you will hardly find any difference between it and the proto-plasmic germ of a dog1 or of a cat1 or of a tree4 ,it is smaller than a pin's head4 ,and in that state this young man inherited all these peculiarities from his grandfather2 or1 in other words1 before he had a nose1 he got a crooked nose2 before he had eyes1 he inherited cross-eyes1 and before he had any brain1 he inherited all the wonderful powers-his musical and artistic talents4 ,does it not seem absurd to you8 ,even if we admit this theory of heredity1 then what do we understand8 ,that the whole of this young man existed in the form of a protoplasm before he was born4 ,his cross-eyes1 his crooked nose1 his artistic talents--all these pre-existed in the form of a protoplasmic cell4 ,this leads up to the same thing which is taught by the theory of ,reincarnation1 or1 in other words1 if it be possible for this young man to remain in the form of a protoplasm and inherit all these things before his birth1 why cannot we believe that the soul or the subtle body of this young man possessed them from the very beginning8 ,according to ,vedanta this young man was not the creature of his grandfather1 but he had his own independent existence2 only by coming through the channel of his parents he had received certain characteristic impressions1 just as a tree in its process of growth will receive from the environments certain peculiarities when it assimilates those properties4 ,the doctrine of ,reincarnation alone can explain satisfactorily and rationally the diversities among children and the reason of the many instances of uncommon powers and genius displayed in childhood4 ,the theory of heredity has up to this time failed to give any good reason for them4 ,why is it that ,pascal1 when twelve years old1 succeeded in discovering for himself the greater part of plane geometry4 ,how could the shepherd ,mangiamelo1 when five years old1 calculate like an arithmetical machine4 ,think of the child ,zerah ,colburn3 when he was under eight years of age he could solve the most tremendous mathematical problems instantly and without using any figures4 ,in one instance he took the number #h and raised it up progressively to the sixteenth power and instantly mentioned the result which contained #ae figures--#bhl1#dgd1igf1gaj1fef4 ,of course he was right in every figure4 ,when asked the square root of numbers consisting of six figures1 he would state the result instantly with perfect accuracy4 ,he used to give the cube root of numbers in the hundreds of millions the very moment when it was asked4 ,somebody asked him once how many minutes there were in #dh years1 he answered1 #be1bhh1hjj4 ,mozart1 the great musician1 wrote a sonata when he was four years old and an opera in his eighth year4 ,theresa ,milanolla played the violin with such skill that many people thought that she must have played before her birth4 ,there are many such instances of wonderful powers exhibited by artists and painters when they were quite young4 ,sankarcharya1 the great commentator of the ,vedanta philosophy1 finished his commentary when he was twelve years old4 ,how can such cases be explained by the theory of hereditary transmission8 ,many of you have heard of the wonderful musical talents of ,blind ,tom4 ,this blind negro slave was born on his master's plantation and was brought up as a typical negro4 ,he received no training in music or in any other line4 ,one day when his master's family were at dinner he happened to come into his master's parlor and displayed his marvelous musical power for the first time by playing on his master's piano4 ,afterwards he was exhibited in different states of this country4 ,physically he was nothing but a typical negro4 ,his intellect was very poor1 but in music he was a master4 ,his musical talents were so great that he composed music for himself and played his own compositions4 ,sometimes after hearing a new piece of rapid music once1 he could reproduce it note for note4 ,where did he get all these powers8 ,from whom did he inherit them8 ,his parents perhaps never heard of a piano4 ,he never had a lesson in his life1 and he could not have understood even if he had had any4 ,not long ago ,i saw a girl of about six years1 who played the piano most beautifully and who could reproduce the most difficult music after hearing it once4 ,it seems to me that she must have played the piano in her previous incarnation4 ,this is the only explanation that we can give4 ,does heredity explain such cases8 ,no4 ,these illustrations are sufficient to disprove the theory of cumulative heredity4 ,cumulative means gradualness4 ,the believers in this theory say that a genius is the result of cumulative heredity1 that is1 it presents itself by degrees from less genius to greater and still greater and so on4 ,in the whole history of the genealogy of geniuses1 like ,homer1 ,plato1 ,shakespeare1 ,goethe1 ,raphael1 there never was in their families almost ,plato1 almost ,shakespeare1 or almost ,goethe4 ,neither is it possible to trace the extraordinary powers of any of these back to any member of their ancestral line4 ,therefore we can say that no other theory than that of ,reincarnation can explain satisfactorily the causes which produce geniuses and prodigies in this world4 ,those who accept the truth of ,reincarnation do not blame their parents for their poor talents1 or for not possessing extraordinary powers1 but they remain content with their own lot1 knowing that they have made themselves as they are to-day by their own thoughts and deeds in their previous incarnations4 ,they understand the meaning of the saying what thou sowest thou must reap1 and always endeavor to mould their future by better thoughts and better deeds4 ,they explain all the inequalities and diversities of life and character by the law of ,karma1 which governs the process of ,reincarnation as well as the gradual evolution of the germs of life from lower to higher stages of existence4 ,,iii4 ,,evolution ,,and ,,reincarnation4 ,the amazing achievements of modern science have been opening every day new gates of wisdom and slowly bringing human minds nearer and nearer to the ultimate reality of the universe4 ,the fire of knowledge kindled by science has already burnt down many dogmas and beliefs1 held sacred by the superstition of the past1 which stood in the way of truth-seeking minds4 ,in the first place science has disproved the theory of the creation of the universe out of nothing by the action of some supernatural power4 ,it has shown that the universe did not appear in its present form or come into existence all of a sudden only a few thousand years ago1 but that it has taken ages to pass through different stages before it could reach its present condition4 ,each of these stages was directly related to a previous stage by the law of causation1 which always operates in accordance with definite rules4 ,the phenomena of the universe1 according to science1 are subject to evolution1 or gradual change and progressive development from a relatively uniform condition to a relative complexity4 ,from the greatest solar system down to the smallest blade of grass1 everything in the universe has taken its present shape and form through this cosmic process of evolution4 ,our planet earth has gradually evolved1 perhaps out of a nebulous mass which existed at first in a gaseous state4 ,the sun1 moon1 stars1 satellites and other planets have come into existence by going through innumerable changes produced by the evolutionary process of the ,cosmos4 ,through the same process plants1 insects1 fishes1 reptiles1 birds1 animals1 man1 and all living matter that inhabit this earth have evolved from minute germs of life into their present forms4 ,the theory of ,evolution says that man did not come into existence all of a sudden1 but is related to lower animals and to plants1 either directly or indirectly4 ,the germ of life had passed through various stages of physical form before it could appear as a man4 ,that branch of science which is called ,embryology has proved the fact that man is the epitome of the whole creation4 ,it tells that the human body before its birth passes through all the different stages of the animal kingdom--such as the polyp1 fish1 reptile1 dog1 ape1 and at last1 man4 ,if we remember that nature is always consistent1 that her laws are uniform and that whatever exists in the microcosm exists also in the macrocosm1 and then study nature1 we shall find that all the germs of life which exist in the universe are bound to pass through stages resembling the embryonic types before they can appear in the form of man4 ,in explaining the theory of ,evolution1 science says that there are two principal factors in the process of evolution2 the first is the tendency to vary1 which exists in all living forms whether vegetable or animal2 the second is the tendency of environment to influence that variation1 either favorably or unfavorably4 ,without the first1 evolution of any kind would be absolutely impossible4 ,but the cause of that innate tendency to vary is still unknown to science4 ,upon the second depends the law of natural selection4 ,the variation must be adapted to favorable conditions of life2 consequently either the germ of life will select suitable environments or vary itself in order to suit the surrounding conditions1 if they are unfavorable4 ,but the agent of this selective process is the struggle for existence1 which is a no less important factor4 ,thus ,evolution depends on these three laws3 ,tendency to vary1 or variation1 natural selection1 and struggle for existence4 ,science tries to explain through these three laws the physical1 mental1 intellectual1 moral and spiritual evolution of mankind4 ,but the theory of ,evolution will remain unintelligible until science can trace the cause of that innate tendency to vary which exists in every stage of all living forms4 ,if we study closely we find that man's self consists of two natures1 one animal and the other moral or spiritual4 ,animal nature includes all the animal propensities1 desire for sense enjoyments1 love of self1 fear of death and struggle for existence4 ,each of these is to be found in lower animals as well as in human beings1 the difference being only in degree and not in kind4 ,in a savage tribe the expression of this animal nature is simple and natural1 while in a highly civilized nation it is expressed not in a simple and straightforward manner1 but in an artful and refined way4 ,in a civilized community the same nature working through varied device1 policy and plan brings the same results in a more polished form4 ,in the struggle for existence amongst lower animals and savage tribes1 those who are physically strong survive and gain advantage over those who are physically weak2 while in the civilized world the same result is obtained1 not by displaying physical force1 but by art1 diplomacy1 policy1 strategy and skill4 ,various kinds of defensive and offensive weapons have been invented to conquer those who are less skillful in using them1 although they may be physically stronger4 ,the simple expression of animal nature which we notice in savages and lower animals1 by the natural process of evolution has gradually become more and more complex1 as we find in the civilized nations of the world4 ,the energy of the lower human nature is spent chiefly in the struggle for material existence4 ,but there is another nature in man which is higher than this4 ,it expresses itself in various ways1 but on a higher plane4 ,love of truth1 mastery over passion1 control of the senses1 disinterested self-sacrifice1 mercy and kindness to all creatures1 desire to help the distressed1 forgiveness1 faith in a ,supreme ,being and devotion2 all these are the expressions of that higher moral and spiritual nature4 ,they cannot be explained as developed from animal nature by means of the struggle for material existence4 ,for these qualities are not to be found in lower animals1 although the struggle for existence is there4 ,the moral and spiritual nature of human beings cannot be traced as the outgrowth or gradual development of the animal nature4 ,there is a dispute among the ,evolutionists as to the method of explaining their cause4 ,some say that these higher faculties have evolved out of the lower ones and have developed by variation and natural selection2 while others hold that some other higher influence1 law or agency is required to account for them4 ,professor ,huxley says3 ,as ,i have already urged1 the practice of that which is ethically best--what we call goodness or virtue--involves a course of conduct which in all respects is opposed to that which leads to success in the cosmic struggle for existence4 ,in place of ruthless self-assertion1 it demands self-restraint2 in place of thrusting aside or treading down all competitors1 it requires that the individual shall not merely respect1 but shall help his fellows2 its influence is directed not so much to the survival of the fittest as to the fitting of as many as possible to survive4 ,it repudiates the gladiatorial theory of existence4 ,it demands that each man who enters into the enjoyment of the advantages of a polity shall be mindful of his debt to those who have laboriously constructed it1 and shall take heed that no act of his weakens the fabric in which he has been permitted to live4 ,laws and moral precepts are directed to the end of curbing the cosmic process1 and reminding the individual of his duty to the community1 to the protection and influence of which he owes1 if not existence itself1 at least the life of something better than a brutal savage4 7,evolution and ,ethics1 pp4 #ha-hb47 ,prof4 ,calderwood says3 ,so far as human organism is concerned1 there seem no overwhelming obstacles to be encountered by an evolution theory1 but it seems impossible under such a theory to account for the appearance of the thinking1 self-regulating life distinctly human4 ,thus1 according to some of the best thinkers1 the explanation of the moral and spiritual nature of man as a development of the animal nature1 is quite insufficient and unsatisfactory4 ,the theory of natural selection in the struggle for existence cannot explain the cause of the higher nature of man4 ,we cannot say that a theory is complete because it explains many facts4 ,on the contrary1 if it fails to explain a single fact1 then it is proved to be incomplete4 ,as such1 the theory that cannot explain satisfactorily the cause of the moral and spiritual nature of man cannot be accepted as a complete theory4 ,that explanation will be considered as complete which will explain most satisfactorily all the various manifestations of the animal1 moral and spiritual nature4 ,moreover1 supposing the tendency to vary has evolved into the moral and spiritual nature of man1 science does not explain the cause of that tendency to vary1 nor how animal nature can be transformed into moral and spiritual nature4 ,is that tendency to vary indefinite1 or is it limited by any definite law8 ,science does not say anything about it4 ,the explanation of the theologians1 that the spiritual nature has been superadded to the animal nature by some extra-cosmic spiritual agency is not scientific1 nor does it appeal to our reason4 ,now let us see what ,vedanta has to say on this point4 ,vedanta accepts evolution and admits the laws of variation and natural selection1 but goes a step beyond modern science by explaining the cause of that tendency to vary4 ,it says1 there is nothing in the end which was not also in the beginning4 ,it is a law which governs the process of evolution as well as the law of causation4 ,if we admit this grand truth of nature1 then it will not be difficult to explain by the theory of ,evolution the gradual manifestation of the higher nature of man4 ,the tendency of scientific monism is towards that end4 ,some of the modern scientists who hold the monistic position have found out the same truth which was discovered long ago by the ,vedantic philosophers in ,india4 ,j4 ,arthur ,thomson1 an eminent ,english scientist of the present day1 in his book on ,the ,study of ,animal ,life1 says3 ,the world is one1 not two-fold-1 the spiritual influx is the primal reality and there is nothing in the end which was not also in the beginning4 ,but the evolutionists do not accept this truth4 ,let us understand it clearly4 ,it means that that which existed potentially at the time of the beginning of evolution has gradually manifested in the various stages and grades of evolution4 ,if we admit that a unicellular germ of life or a bioplasm1 after passing through various stages of evolution1 has ultimately manifested in the form of a highly developed human being1 then we shall have to admit the potentiality of all the manifested powers in that germ or bioplasm1 because the law is that which exists in the end existed also in the beginning4 ,the animal nature1 higher nature1 mind1 intellect1 spirit1 all these exist potentially in the germ of life4 ,if we do not admit this law then the problem will arise3 ,how can non-existence become existent8 ,how can something come out of nothing8 ,how can that come into existence which did not exist before8 ,each germ of life1 according to ,vedanta1 possesses infinite potentialities and infinite possibilities4 ,the powers that remain latent have the natural tendency to manifest perfectly and to become actual4 ,in their attempt they vary according to the surrounding environments1 selecting suitable conditions or remaining latent as long as circumstances do not favor them4 ,therefore variation1 according to ,vedanta1 is caused by this attempt of the potential powers to become actual4 ,when life and mind began to evolve1 the possibilities of action and reaction hitherto latent in the germ of life became real and all things became1 in a sense1 new4 ,nobody can imagine the amount of latent power which a minute germ of life possesses until it expresses in gross form on the physical plane4 ,by seeing the seed of a ,banyan tree1 one who has never seen the tree cannot imagine what powers lie dormant in it4 ,when a baby is born we cannot tell whether he will be a great saint1 or a wonderful artist1 or a philosopher1 or an idiot1 or a villain of the worst type4 ,parents know nothing about his future4 ,along with his growth certain latent powers gradually begin to manifest4 ,those which are the strongest and most powerful will overcome others and check their course for some time2 but when the powers that remain subdued by stronger ones get favorable conditions they will appear in manifested forms4 ,as1 for instance1 chemical forces may slumber in matter for a thousand years1 but when the contact with the re-agents sets them free1 they appear again and produce certain results4 ,for thousands of years galvanism slumbered in copper and zinc1 which lay quietly beside silver4 ,as soon as all three are brought together under the required conditions silver is consumed in flame4 ,a dry seed of a plant may preserve the slumbering power of growth through two or three thousand years and then reappear under favorable conditions4 ,sir ,g4 ,wilkinson1 the great archaeologist1 found some grains of wheat in a hermetically sealed vase in a grave at ,thebes1 which must have lain there for three thousand years4 ,when ,mr4 ,pettigrew sowed them they grew into plants4 ,some vegetable roots found in the hands of an ,egyptian mummy1 which must have been at least two thousand years old1 were planted in a flower-pot1 and they grew and flourished4 ,thus1 whenever the latent powers get favorable conditions1 they manifest according to their nature1 even after thousands of years4 ,similarly1 there are many instances of slumbering mental powers4 ,after remaining dormant for a long period in our normal condition1 they may1 in certain abnormal states--such as madness1 delirium1 catalepsy1 hypnotic sleep and so forth-flash out into luminous consciousness and throw into absolute oblivion the powers that are manifesting in the normal state4 ,talents for eloquence1 music1 painting1 and uncommon ingenuity in several mechanical arts1 traces of which were never found in the ordinary normal condition1 are often evolved in the state of madness4 ,somnambulists in deep sleep have solved most difficult mathematical problems and performed various acts with results which have surprised them in their normal waking states4 ,thus we can understand that each individual mind is the storehouse of many powers1 various impressions and ideas1 some of which manifest in our normal state1 while others remain latent4 ,our present condition of mind and body is nothing but the manifested form of certain dormant powers that exist in ourselves4 ,if new powers are roused up and begin to manifest the whole nature will be changed into a new form4 ,the manifestation of latent powers is at the bottom of the evolution of one species into another4 ,this idea has been expressed in a few words by ,patanjali1 the great ,hindu evolutionist who lived long before the ,christian era4 ,footnote3 ,the reader ought to know that the doctrine of ,evolution was known in ,india long before the ,christian era4 ,about the seventh century1 ,b4 ,c41 ,kapila1 the father of ,hindu ,evolutionists1 explained this theory for the first time through logic and science4 ,sir ,monier ,monier ,williams says3 ,indeed if ,i may be allowed the anachronism1 the ,hindus were ,spinozites more than #b1jjj years before the existence of ,spinoza2 and ,darwinians many centuries before ,darwin2 and ,evolutionists many centuries before the doctrine of ,evolution had been accepted by the scientists of our time and before any word like ,evolution existed in any language of the world4 7,p4 #ab1 ,hinduism and ,brahminism47 ,prof4 ,huxley says3 ,to say nothing of ,indian ,sages to whom ,evolution was a familiar notion ages before ,paul of ,tarsus was born4 7,p4 #aej1 ,science and ,hebrew ,tradition47 ,in the second aphorism of the fourth chapter 7see ,raja ,yoga1 by ,swami ,vivekananda1 p4 #baj7 it is said1 ,the ,evolution into another species is caused by the in-filling of nature4 ,the nature is filled not from without but from within4 ,nothing is superadded to the individual soul from outside4 ,the germs are already there1 but their development depends upon their coming in contact with the necessary conditions requisite for proper manifestation4 ,we sometimes see a wicked man suddenly become saintlike4 ,there are instances of murderers and robbers becoming saints4 ,a religionist will explain the cause of their sudden change1 by saying that the grace of the ,almighty has fallen upon them and transformed their whole nature4 ,but ,vedanta says that the moral and spiritual powers that remained latent in them have been roused up1 and the result is the sudden transformation4 ,none can tell when or how the slumbering powers will wake up and begin to manifest4 ,the germ of life1 or the individual soul as it is ordinarily called1 possesses infinite possibilities4 ,each germ of life is studying1 as it were1 the book of its own nature by unfolding one page after another4 ,when it has gone through all the pages1 or1 in other words1 all the stages of evolution1 perfect knowledge is acquired1 and its course is finished4 ,we have read our lower nature by turning each page1 or1 in other words1 by passing through each stage of animal life from the minutest bioplasm up to the present stage of existence4 ,now we are studying the pages which deal with moral and spiritual laws4 ,if any one wants to read any page over again he will do it4 ,just as in reading a book1 if anybody feels particularly interested in any page or chapter he will read it over and over again and will not open a new page or a new chapter until he is perfectly satisfied with it4 ,similarly1 in reading the book of life1 if the individual soul likes any particular stage1 he will stay there until he is perfectly satisfied with it2 after that he will go forward and study other pages4 ,one may read very slowly1 and another very fast2 but whether we read slowly or rapidly each one of us is bound to read the whole book of nature and attain to perfection sooner or later4 ,according to ,vedanta1 the end and aim of ,evolution is the attainment of perfection4 ,physical evolution of animal life reached its perfection in human form4 ,there cannot be any other form higher than human on this earth under present conditions4 ,it is the perfection of animal form4 ,from this we can infer that the tendency of the law of ,evolution is to reach perfection4 ,when it is attained to1 the whole purpose is served4 ,do we see in nature any other higher form evolved out of the human body8 ,no4 ,shall we not be justified if we say that the end of physical evolution is the attainment of the perfection of animal form8 ,again as the purpose and method of natural laws are uniform throughout the universe1 the end of intellectual1 moral and spiritual evolution will be attained when intellectual1 moral and spiritual perfection are acquired4 ,intellectual perfection means perfection of intellect2 and intellect is perfect when we understand the true nature of things and never mistake the unreal for the real1 matter for spirit1 non-eternal for eternal1 or vice versa4 ,moral perfection consists in the destruction of selfishness2 and spiritual perfection is the manifestation of the true nature of spirit which is immortal1 free1 divine and one with the ,universal ,spirit or ,god4 ,evolution attains to the highest fulfilment of its purpose when the spirit manifests perfectly4 ,the tendency of nature is to have perfect manifestation of all her powers4 ,when certain powers predominate they manifest first while the others remain dormant4 ,as we find in the process of evolution1 when animal nature manifests perfectly the moral and spiritual nature remain latent4 ,again when moral and spiritual nature manifest fully1 the animal is in abeyance4 ,it is for this reason we do not find expressions of moral and spiritual nature in lower animals or in those human beings who live like them4 ,man is the only animal in whom such perfect expressions of moral and spiritual nature are possible4 ,when the individual soul begins to study its spiritual nature1 its lower or animal nature is gradually eclipsed4 ,as the higher nature becomes powerful the lower nature dwindles into insignificance2 its energy is transformed into that of the higher nature1 and ultimately it disappears altogether and rises no more4 ,then the soul becomes free from the lower or animal nature4 ,there are many stages in the higher nature1 as well as in the lower4 ,each of these stages binds the individual soul so long as it stays there4 ,as it rises on a higher plane the lower stages disappear and cease to bind4 ,but the moment that any individual1 after passing through all the stages of the spiritual nature1 reaches the ultimate point of perfection1 he realizes his true nature which is immortal and divine4 ,then his true individuality manifests4 ,for lack of true knowledge1 he identified himself with each stage successively and thought that his individuality was one with the powers which were manifested in each stage4 ,consequently he thought by mistake that he was affected by the changes of each stage4 ,but now he realizes that his real individuality always remained unaffected4 ,he sees that his true individuality shines always in the same manner1 although the limiting adjuncts may vary4 ,as the light of a lamp appears of different colors1 if it passes through glasses of different colors1 so the light of the true individual appears as animal or human when it passes through the animal or human nature of the subtle body4 ,the subtle body of an individual changes from animal nature through moral and spiritual into divine4 ,as this gradual growth cannot be expected in one life we shall have to admit the truth of ,reincarnation1 which teaches gradual evolution of the germ of life or the individual soul through many lives and various forms4 ,otherwise the theory of ,evolution will remain imperfect1 incomplete and purposeless4 ,the doctrine of ,reincarnation differs from the accepted theory of ,evolution in admitting a gradual but continuous evolution of the subtle body through many gross forms4 ,the gross body may appear or disappear1 but the subtle body continues to exist even after the dissolution of the gross body and re-manifests itself in some other form4 ,the theory of ,reincarnation when properly understood will appear as a supplement to the theory of ,evolution4 ,without this most important supplement the ,evolution theory will never be complete and perfect4 ,evolution explains the process of life1 while ,reincarnation explains the purpose of life4 ,therefore1 both must go hand in hand to make the explanation satisfactory in every respect4 ,james ,freeman ,clarke says3 ,that man has come up to his present state of development by passing through lower forms1 is the popular doctrine of science to-day4 ,what is called ,evolution teaches that we have reached our present state by a very long and gradual ascent from the lowest animal organizations4 ,it is true that the ,darwinian theory takes no notice of the evolution of the soul1 but only of the body4 ,but it appears to me that a combination of the two views would remove many difficulties which still attach to the theory of natural selection and the survival of the fittest4 ,if we are to believe in ,evolution let us have the assistance of the soul itself in this development of new species4 ,thus science and philosophy will co-operate1 nor will poetry hesitate to lend her aid4 7,p4 #aij1 ,ten ,great ,religions1 ,,ii47 ,evolution of the body depends upon the evolution of the germ of life or the individual soul4 ,when these two are combined the explanation becomes perfect4 ,the theory of ,reincarnation is a logical necessity for the completion of the theory of ,evolution4 ,if we admit a continuous evolution of a unit of the germ of life through many gross manifestations then we unconsciously accept the teachings of the doctrine of ,reincarnation4 ,in passing through different forms and manifestations the unit of life does not lose its identity or individuality4 ,as an atom does not lose its identity or individuality 7if you allow me to suppose an atom has a kind of individuality7 although it passes from the mineral1 through the vegetable1 into the animal1 so the germ of life always preserves its identity or individuality although it passes through the different stages of evolution4 ,therefore it is said in the ,bhagavad ,gt1 as in our ordinary life the individual soul passes from a baby body to a young one and from a young to an old1 and carries with it all the impressions1 ideas and experience that it has gathered in its former stage of existence and reproduces them in proper time1 so when a man dies the individual soul passes from an old body into a new one1 and takes with it the subtle body wherein are stored up all that it experienced and gathered during its past incarnations4 ,knowing this1 wise men are never afraid of death4 ,they know that death is nothing but a mere change from one body into another4 ,therefore1 if any one does not succeed in conquering the lower nature by the higher1 he will try again in his next incarnation1 after starting from the point which he reached in his past life4 ,he will not begin again from the very beginning1 but from the last stage at which he arrived4 ,thus we see that ,reincarnation is the logical sequence of evolution4 ,it completes and makes perfect that theory and explains the cause of the moral and spiritual nature of man4 ,,iv4 ,,which ,,is ,,scientific--,,resurrection ,,or ,,reincarnation8 ,the students of history are interested to know where the idea of resurrection first arose and how it was adopted by other nations4 ,if we read carefully the writings ascribed to ,moses and other writers of the ,old ,testament we find that the ancient ,israelites did not believe in the ,christian heaven or hell1 nor in reward or punishment after death4 ,it is doubtful whether they had any clear conception of the existence of soul after the dissolution of the human body4 ,they had no definite idea of the hereafter4 ,they did not believe in the resurrection either of the soul or body4 ,job longed for death thinking that it would end his mental agony4 ,in ,psalms we read1 ,wilt ,thou shew wonders to the dead8 ,shall the dead arise and praise ,thee8 7,ps4 lxxxviii1 #aj47 ,in death there is no remembrance of ,thee2 in the grave who shall give ,thee thanks8 7,ps4 vi1 #e47 ,again 7,ps4 cxlvi1 #d7 it is said about princes and the son of man1--,his breath goeth forth1 he returneth to his earth1 in that very day his thoughts perish4 ,the dead praise not the ,lord1 neither any that go down into silence4 7,ps4 cxv1 #ag47 ,solomon speaks boldly3 ,all things come alike to all2 there is one event to the righteous and to the wicked1 to the good and to the clean and to the unclean444 as is the good1 so is the sinner4 7,eccl4 ix1 #b47 ,go thy way1 eat thy bread with joy1 and drink thy wine with a merry heart4444 ,live joyfully with thy wife444 for there is no work1 nor device1 nor knowledge1 nor wisdom in the grave1 whither thou goest4 7,eccl4 ix1 #g1 #i1 #aj47 ,again in verse #e it is said3 ,the dead know not anything1 neither have they anymore a reward1 for the memory of them is forgotten4 ,solomon says3 ,for that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts2 even one thing befalleth them2 as the one dieth1 so dieth the other2 yea1 they have all one breath1 so that a man hath no pre-eminence above a beast4 ,all go into one place2 all are of the dust and all turn to dust again4 ,who knoweth the spirit of man that goeth upward and the spirit of the beast that goeth downward to the earth8 7,eccl4 iii1 #ai-ba47 ,there are many such passages which show clearly that before the ,babylonian captivity the ,israelites had no belief in reward or punishment1 neither in heaven nor hell nor in the resurrection of the soul4 ,some say that they had a belief in a sheol or pit where departed souls remained after death1 but were never resurrected4 ,but when the ancient ,jews were conquered by the ,persians1 #ecf ,b4,c41 they came in contact with a nation which had developed a belief in one ,god1 in a heaven and a hell1 in the resurrection of the dead1 in reward and punishment after death1 and in the last day of judgment4 ,under the dominion of ,persia1 whose rule began with the capture of ,babylon and lasted from #ecf-ccc ,b4,c41 the ,jews were greatly influenced by the ,persian religion4 ,they gave up their idolatry1 gradually developed social organization and had considerable liberty4 ,about that time the ,jews were divided into two classes1 the ,pharisees and ,sadducees4 ,those who adopted the religious ideas of the ,parsees were called ,pharisees 7according to some authorities the word ,pharisee was the ,hebrew form of ,parsee71 and those who followed strictly the ,jewish ideas1 ceremonies1 rituals and beliefs were called ,sadducees4 ,the former were sharply opposed to the latter in their doctrinal beliefs4 ,they believed in angels and spirits1 they expected the resurrection of the dead and believed in future reward and punishment and also in ,divine pre-ordination4 ,the ,sadducees did not step beyond the bounds of ancient ,judaism4 ,they were ,orthodox and very conservative in their views4 ,they denied the existence of angels and spirits1 the resurrection of the dead1 and reward and punishment after death4 ,in ,matt1 xxii1 #bc1 we read1 ,the same day came to him the ,sadducees which say that there is no resurrection4 ,the ,sadducees were fewer in number than the ,pharisees4 ,gradually the latter grew very powerful and after the death of ,jesus their doctrines of the resurrection of the dead1 and of reward and punishment after death1 and the belief in angels and spirits1 became the cardinal principles of the new ,christian sect4 ,thus we see that the idea of resurrection first arose in ,persia and afterwards took a prominent place in the writings of the ,new ,testament1 and since then it has been largely accepted by the ,christians of the ,western countries4 ,the ,zoroastrians believed that the soul of the dead hovers about the body for three nights and does not depart for the other world until the dawn after the third night4 ,then the righteous go to heaven and the wicked to hell4 ,there the wicked remain until the time of renovation of the universe1 that is1 the judgment day4 ,after the renovation1 when ,ahriman or ,satan is killed1 the souls of the wicked will be purified and have everlasting progress4 ,footnote3 ,sacred ,books of the ,east1 ,vol4 xvii1 pp4 #bg1 #cd1 #df4 ,the question was asked1 ,how shall they produce resurrection8 ,ahura ,mazda says3 ,the reply is this1 that the preparation and production of the resurrection are an achievement connected with miracle1 a sublimity1 and afterwards also a wondrous appearance unto the creatures uninformed4 ,the secrets and affairs of the persistent ,creator are like every mystery and secret4 ,footnote3 ,ibid41 p4 #hj4 ,the ,zoroastrians believed in the resurrection1 not of the physical body1 but of the soul1 and that it was an act of miracle4 ,similarly miraculous was the resurrection of ,jesus4 ,although ,jesus ,himself never mentioned what kind of resurrection1 whether of body or of soul that ,he meant and believed in1 the interpretation of the writers of the ,gospels shows that ,his disciples understood ,him to mean bodily resurrection and the re-appearance of ,his physical form4 ,the three days remained1 just as the ,zoroastrians believed4 ,the miraculous and wondrous appearance of ,jesus before ,his disciples was preached most vigorously by ,paul4 ,in his ,epistle to the ,corinthians1 ,paul declares emphatically that the whole of the ,christian religion depends upon the miraculous resurrection and re-appearance of ,jesus4 ,although ,paul said the spiritual body of the risen dead is not the same as flesh and blood body 7,i ,cor41 ,,xv71 still that important point is generally overlooked1 and the result is the belief which we find amongst some of the ,christian sects2 that at the call of the angels1 the body will rise from the grave and the mouldering dust of bones and flesh will be put together by the miraculous power of the ,almighty ,god4 ,paul says3 ,but now is ,christ risen from the dead1 and become the first fruits of them that slept 7,i ,cor41 ,,xv1 #bj74 ,he preached that ,christ was the first born from the dead1 that those who believe in ,christ would rise as ,he did and that those who would not believe in ,him or in ,his resurrection should not rise4 ,we have already noticed that the ,parsees believed in a miraculous resurrection2 that the same miracle became more definite in the case of ,jesus2 and that the ,christian faith was afterwards founded upon that miraculous event4 ,both the ,parsees and the followers of ,christ did not mean by resurrection any universal law1 but a miracle done by certain supernatural powers4 ,they did not give any scientific reasons for such a miracle4 ,but modern science denies miracles4 ,it teaches that this universe is guided1 not by miracles as the old thinkers used to believe1 but by definite laws which are always consistent and universal4 ,there cannot be any exception to those laws which are uniform throughout4 ,if resurrection be one of those laws1 then it must have existed before the birth of ,jesus2 as such1 how could ,he be the first born from the dead1 as described by ,paul4 ,conversely1 if ,jesus was the first who rose from the dead1 then resurrection cannot be a universal law4 ,scientists would not believe in anything which is not based upon universal laws4 ,some of the agnostics and materialists have gone so far as to say that ,jesus did not die on the cross1 but his animation was suspended when his body was taken down from the cross by ,joseph of ,arimathsea4 ,when ,joseph went to ,pilate and craved the body of ,jesus1 ,pilate marvelled if ,he were dead 7,mark ,,xv1 #dd71 because it was only six hours after the crucifixion4 ,some of the modern physiologists are of opinion that temperate and strong men might live for several days on the cross4 ,these heretical agnostics and skeptical scientists say that the body of ,jesus revived after a few hours in the cool1 rock-cut tomb1 that he walked out of the tomb1 went to ,galilee and appeared before his disciples4 ,footnote3 ,vide ,science and ,christian ,tradition1 by ,prof4 ,huxley1 pp4 #bgi-bhj4 ,whatever the facts may be 7nobody can now tell exactly what actually happened71 it is clear that the scientists are not ready to take anything upon authority4 ,they do not care to believe in anything because it is written in this book or that4 ,they must have convincing proofs and a rational explanation of every phenomenon of nature4 ,they want to penetrate into miracles in order to discover the universal laws that govern them4 ,if they do not find any such laws1 they will surely reject every event that is supposed to be caused by miraculous or supernatural powers4 ,the theory of a miraculous resurrection is attended with the belief that the individual soul does not exist before birth4 ,the supporters of this theory hold that at the time of birth1 the individual1 being created out of nothing1 comes fresh into existence4 ,but science tells us that sudden creation out of nothing and a total destruction of anything are both impossible4 ,matter and force are indestructible4 ,science teaches evolution and not creation1 and denies the intervention of any supernatural being as the cause of phenomenal changes4 ,the theory of ,resurrection ignores all these ultimate conclusions of modern science4 ,on the contrary1 the doctrine of ,reincarnation1 after accepting all the truths and laws of nature that have been discovered by modern science1 carries them to their proper logical conclusions4 ,reincarnation is based upon evolution4 ,it means a continuous evolution of an individual germ of life1 and a gradual re-manifestation of all the powers and forces that exist in it potentially4 ,moreover1 the doctrine of ,reincarnation is founded on the law of cause and effect4 ,it teaches that the cause is not outside of the effect1 but lies in the effect4 ,the cause is the potential or unmanifested state of the effect1 and effect is the actual or manifested cause4 ,there is one current of infinite force or power constantly flowing in the ocean of reality of the universe1 and appearing in the innumerable forms of waves4 ,we call one set of waves the cause of another set1 but in fact that which is the cause is the potentiality of the future effect and the actuality of a previous potential cause4 ,the underlying current is one and the same throughout4 ,reincarnation denies the idea that the soul has come into existence all of a sudden or has been created for the first time1 but it holds that it has been existing from the beginningless past1 and will exist all through eternity4 ,the individual soul enjoys or suffers according to the acts it performs4 ,all enjoyment and suffering are but the reactions of our actions4 ,actions are the causes and the reactions are the results4 ,our present life is the result of our past actions1 and our future will be the result of the present4 ,the actions which we are now doing will not be lost4 ,do you think that the thought-forces of one life-time will end suddenly after death8 ,no4 ,they will be conserved and remain potentially in the center and re-manifest under suitable conditions4 ,each human soul is nothing but a center of thought-force4 ,this center is called in ,sanskrit ,skshma ,sarra or the subtle body of an individual4 ,the subtle germ of life or1 in other words1 the invisible center of thought-forces1 will manufacture a physical vehicle for expressing the latent powers that are ready for manifestation4 ,this process will continue until the germ can express most perfectly all the powers that are coiled up in its invisible form4 ,as the doctrine of ,reincarnation is in agreement with all the physical laws1 so it is based upon psychical1 moral and ethical laws4 ,as on the objective plane the law of action and reaction governs the objective phenomena1 so on the subjective plane of consciousness1 if the mental action or thought be good1 the reaction will be good1 and the reaction will be evil if the mental action be evil1 because every action produces a similar reaction1 ,a good reaction is one which makes us happy and brings pleasant sensations or peace of mind1 while an evil reaction brings suffering1 unpleasant sensations1 and makes one miserable4 ,thus ,reincarnation makes us free agents for action1 as well as for reaping the results or reactions of those actions4 ,in fact1 we mould our own nature1 according to our desires1 tendencies and works4 ,the theory of ,resurrection1 as commonly understood1 does not explain why one man is born with a sinful nature and another with a virtuous one4 ,it contents itself with saying as ,luther said3 ,man is a beast of burden who only moves as his rider orders2 sometimes ,god rides him and sometimes ,satan4 ,but why ,god should allow ,satan to ride ,his own creature nobody can tell4 ,at any rate1 man must suffer eternally for the crimes which he is forced by ,satan to commit4 ,moreover this theory pre-supposes predestination and that the individual soul is fore-doomed to go either to heaven or to hell4 ,st4 ,augustine first started this doctrine of ,predestination and ,grace to explain why one is born sinful and another sinless4 ,according to this theory1 ,god1 the merciful1 favors somebody with ,his grace at the time of his birth and then he comes into this world ready to be saved1 but the mass of humanity is born sinful and destined for eternal damnation4 ,very few indeed receive the gift of grace and are predestined to be saved4 ,moreover1 this doctrine tells us that ,god creates man out of nothing1 forbids him something1 but at the same time ,he does not give him the power to obey ,his commands4 ,ultimately ,god punishes him with eternal torture on account of his weakness4 ,the body and soul will not be separated4 ,he will not be set free from his body1 because1 if it be so1 there will be the end of his suffering1 which ,god does not like4 ,all these sufferings and punishments are predestined before his birth4 ,thus1 ,st4 ,augustine's dogma of ,predestination and ,grace instead of explaining the difficulty satisfactorily brings horror and dread to human minds1 while the doctrine of ,reincarnation teaches gradual progress from lower to higher1 through ages until the individual reaches perfection4 ,it holds that each individual will become perfect like ,jesus or ,buddha or like the ,father in heaven and manifest divinity either in this life or in some other4 ,one span of life is too short for developing one's powers to perfection4 ,if you should try to train an idiot to become a great artist or a philosopher1 would you ever succeed in your attempt to make him so during his lifetime8 ,no4 ,and will you punish him because he cannot become so8 ,can a man who possesses the slightest common sense be so unreasonable8 ,similarly what would you think if ,god punishes a man because he cannot become perfect within a lifetime8 ,it is a poor argument to say that ,god has given us free-will to choose between right and wrong1 and we are responsible for our choice2 if we choose wrongly we must be punished4 ,the advocates of such an argument forget that at the same time ,god has let loose ,his powerful ,satan to corrupt ,his creatures4 ,it reminds me of an old story4 ,once on a time at a certain place a prisoner was released and set free through the kindness of a tyrant4 ,the tyrant said to the prisoner ,look here1 wicked man1 ,i give you freedom1 you can go to any place2 but there is one condition2 if you are attacked by any wild animal you will be put in the dungeon and there will be no end to your torture4 ,so saying he gave him freedom1 but at the same time ordered his servants to let loose a hungry wolf to chase the man4 ,you can imagine what became of the prisoner4 ,can we call this an act of mercy6 ,the doctrine of ,reincarnation says that each individual soul is potentially perfect and is gradually unfolding its powers and making them actual through the process of ,evolution4 ,at every step of that process it is gaining different experiences which last only for a time4 ,therefore neither ,god nor ,satan is responsible for our good or evil actions4 ,good and evil are like the up and down or the crest and hollow of a wave in the sea4 ,a wave cannot rise without making a hollow somewhere in the sea4 ,so in the infinite ocean of reality innumerable waves are constantly rising4 ,the summit of each wave is called good1 while the hollow beside it is evil or misery and the current of each individual life is constantly flowing towards the ultimate destination which we call perfection4 ,who can tell how long it will take to reach that goal8 ,if anybody can attain to perfection in this life1 he is no longer bound to reincarnate4 ,if he fails he will continue to progress by taking some other body4 ,reincarnation does not teach1 as many people think1 that in the next incarnation one will begin from the very beginning1 but it says that one will start from that point which one reaches before death and will keep the thread of progress unbroken4 ,it does not teach that we go back to animal bodies after death1 but that we get our bodies according to our desires1 tendencies and powers4 ,if any person has no desire to come back to this world or to any other and does not want to enjoy any particular object of pleasure1 and if he is perfectly free from selfishness that person will not have to come back4 ,the theory of ,reincarnation is logical and satisfactory4 ,while the theory of ,resurrection is neither based on scientific truths nor can it logically explain the cause of life and death1 ,reincarnation solves all the problems of life and explains scientifically all the questions and doubts that arise in the human mind4 ,reincarnation is not easily understood by a thoughtless child deluded by the delusion of wealth1 name or fame4 ,everything ends with death1 he thinks1 and thus falls again and again under the sway of death4 ,v4 ,,theory ,,of ,,transmigration4 ,the theory of transmigration is one of the oldest theories accepted by the people of the ,orient to solve the problems concerning life and death as well as to explain the continuity of existence after death4 ,this theory presupposes the existence of the soul as an entity which can live even when the gross material body is dead or dissolved into its elements4 ,those who deny the existence of the soul1 of the self-conscious thinker and actor1 as an entity distinct from the gross material body1 necessarily deny this theory of transmigration4 ,the materialistic thinkers of all ages have refused to accept this theory1 because they do not admit the existence of a soul or a self-conscious thinker and actor as an entity1 separate from the gross material body4 ,consequently they do not ask or discuss whether the soul will exist after death or not1 whether it will continue to live or not4 ,such materialists are not the creatures of the twentieth century1 but they have lived in all ages1 in all countries4 ,in ,india and in other civilized countries of ancient times you will find that materialistic thinkers prevailed and they gave the same arguments which we hear now from the agnostics and scientists of to-day4 ,their arguments are generally one-sided and unsatisfactory4 ,they try to deduce the soul or self-conscious entity from the combination of matter or material forces1 but they have not succeeded in giving a scientific proof of it4 ,no arguments in favor of the existence of a soul as an entity will convince them1 because they deny the existence of anything that cannot be perceived by sense powers4 ,if we could bring the soul down on the sense plane and make it visible to these materialistic thinkers1 and if they could make experiments upon it1 then perhaps they would be convinced to a certain extent1 but not until then4 ,but how can we bring the soul down on the sense plane when it is ethereal and finer than anything that we can perceive with our senses8 ,those who try to explain the cause of our earthly life by the theory of heredity do not believe in the truth of transmigration4 ,the modern scientists1 agnostics and materialists generally accept the theory of heredity and endeavor to explain everything by it2 but if we examine their arguments for the theory of heredity1 we shall find that the theory of transmigration is much more satisfactory1 much more rational than that of heredity4 ,among the followers of the great religions of the world1 the majority of ,christians1 ,jews1 ,mohammedans and ,parsees deny the truth of transmigration4 ,of course1 there was a time when the ,christians believed in this transmigration theory4 ,origen and other ,church ,fathers accepted it until the time of ,justinian1 who anathematized all those who believed in ,reincarnation or the pre-existence of the soul4 ,among the ,jews we find that in the ,cabala this idea of transmigration plays the most important part4 ,in fact the ,cabalists accepted this theory to explain all the difficulties that could not be explained by any other theory4 ,but those ,jews1 ,christians1 ,mohammedans and ,parsees who do not believe in the theory of transmigration accept the one-birth theory2 that is1 that ,god creates the souls at the time of birth out of nothing1 and these souls1 having come into existence out of nothing1 continue to live forever2 that this is our first and last birth that we receive2 we did not exist before1 we are suddenly created by ,god1 and after death each one of us will continue to live either in heaven or hell to enjoy or to suffer throughout eternity4 ,among the modern ,spiritualists we find that those who are born and brought up with this idea of one birth do not accept the theory of transmigration4 ,still there are millions and millions of people all over the world who do believe in transmigration and who have found comfort and consolation in their lives as well as a satisfactory solution of the problems of life and death4 ,the theory of ,transmigration1 or ,metempsychosis1 as it has been called by many philosophers1 originally meant the passing of a soul from one body after death into another2 or1 in other words1 it meant that the soul after dwelling in one particular body for a certain length of time leaves it at the time of death1 and in order to gain experience enters into some other body1 either human1 animal or angelic1 which is ready to receive it4 ,it may migrate from the human body to an angelic body and then come down on the human plane1 or to the animal plane and be born again as an animal4 ,so the original meaning of transmigration or metempsychosis was the revolution of the soul from body to body whether animal1 human1 angelic or of the gods4 ,the migrating substance being a fixed quantity1 with fixed qualities1 chooses its form according to its taste1 desire and bent of character4 ,this idea prevailed among the ancient ,egyptians1 according to whom the soul1 after leaving the dead body1 would travel from one body to another for thousands and thousands of years in order to gain experiences in each of the different stages of life4 ,among the ,greek philosophers we find that ,pythagoras1 ,plato and their followers believed in this theory of ,metempsychosis or ,transmigration of souls4 ,pythagoras says3 ,after death the rational mind1 having been freed from the chains of the body1 assumes an ethereal vehicle and passes into the region of the dead where it remains till it is sent back to this world to inhabit some other body human or animal4 ,after undergoing successive purgations1 when it is sufficiently purified1 it is received among the gods and returns to the eternal source from which it first proceeded4 ,plato also believed in this theory4 ,of course we cannot tell exactly from whence ,pythagoras and ,plato got these ideas4 ,some say that they learned these doctrines from ,egypt2 others believed that1 either directly or indirectly1 they learned the theory of transmigration from ,india4 ,plato describes in ,phaedrus1 in mythological language1 why and how the souls take their birth upon this plane1 either as human or animal4 ,he says3 ,in the heaven ,zeus1 the ,father and ,lord of all creatures1 drives his winged car1 ordering all things and superintending them4 ,a host of deities and spirits follow him1 each fulfilling his own function4 ,whoever will and can follows them4 ,after taking this round1 they advance by a steep course along the inner circumference of the heavenly vault and proceed to a banquet4 ,the chariots of the gods1 being well balanced and well driven1 advance easily2 others with difficulty2 for the vicious horse1 unless the charioteer has thoroughly broken him1 weighs down the car by his proclivity towards the earth1 whereupon the soul is put to the extremity of toil and effort4 ,the souls of gods reach the summit1 go outside and stand upon the surface of heaven1 and enjoy celestial bliss4 ,such is the life of the gods2 other souls which follow ,god best and are likest to ,him succeed in seeing the vision of truth and in entering into the outer world with great difficulty4 ,the rest of the souls longing after the upper world all follow2 but not being strong enough1 they are carried round in the deep below1 plunging1 treading on one another1 striving to be first1 and there1 in confusion and extremity of effort1 many of them are lamed and have their wings broken4 ,thus when the soul is unable to follow and fails to behold the vision of ,truth1 sinks beneath the double load of forgetfulness and vice1 her feathers fall from her and she drops to earth and is born again and again as human beings or as animals4 ,plato says3 ,ten thousand years must elapse before the soul can return to the place from whence she came1 for she cannot grow her wings in less4 ,at the end of the first thousand years1 the souls of the good and of the evil kind come together to draw lots1 and choose their bodies according to their tendencies and the bent of their characters4 ,they may take any they like4 ,instead of receiving the natural consequences of their deeds and misdeeds of their previous lives they are allowed to choose their own lot1 according to their experience and bent of character4 ,some1 being disgusted with mankind1 prefer to be born as animals1 such as lions and eagles or some other animals4 ,others delight in trying their luck as human beings4 ,from this mythological description we gather what ,plato meant by transmigration4 ,this ,platonic idea of transmigration or of successive lives of those who inhabit this earth has been criticized by various thinkers of modern times2 and referring to this idea the late ,doctor ,myers1 of the ,psychical ,research ,society of ,london1 writes in his second volume of ,human ,personality3 ,the simple fact that such was probably the opinion of both ,plato and ,virgil shows that there is nothing here which is alien to the best reason or to the highest instincts of men4 ,nor1 indeed1 is it easy to realize any theory of the direct creation of spirits at such different stages of advancement as those which enter upon the earth in the guise of mortal man4 ,there must1 one feels1 be some kind of continuity--some form of spiritual past4 7,p4 #acd47 ,why does ,he not create all souls equal8 ,why will one soul be highly advanced spiritually while another is entirely ignorant and idiotic8 ,this question cannot be answered1 this problem cannot be solved by the special creation theory1 and therefore ,doctor ,myers says that there is no doubt that there was some previous continuity or spiritual past of each individual soul1 and therefore he tacitly admits the theory of ,transmigration4 ,although from a scientific viewpoint he could not give any direct proof regarding this idea of a pre-existence of the soul1 still he could not deny it entirely when he said3 ,the shaping forces which have made our bodies and our minds what they are may always have been psychical forces--from the first living slime-speck to the complex intelligences of to-day4 ,the old transmigrationist's view would thus possess a share of truth and the actual man would be the resultant not only of intermingling heredities on father's and mother's sides1 but of intermingling heredities1 one of planetary and one of cosmic scope4 7,human ,personality1 ,vol4 ,,ii1 p4 #bfg47 ,but this theory of ,transmigration1 as described by ,plato1 is a little different from a similar theory which existed in ,india before his time4 ,in the ,platonic idea of transmigration1 as we have already seen1 the souls were allowed to choose their own lot according to their experience or bent of character1 but not to receive the natural consequence of their deeds and misdeeds4 ,plato did not say anything about the law which governs souls2 but in ancient ,india the great thinkers and philosophers explained that each individual soul is bound by the inexorable law of nature to receive its body as a natural consequence of its former deeds and misdeeds1 and not to have free choice of its lot according to its bent of character4 ,the great thinkers and philosophers of ancient ,india discovered the universal law of cause and effect1 of action and reaction1 and called it by the ,sanskrit term ,karma1 which means the law of cause and sequence2 that every cause must be followed by an effect of a similar nature1 that every action must produce similar reaction1 and conversely every reaction or effect is the result of an action or cause of a similar character4 ,thus there is always a balance and harmony between cause and effect1 between action and reaction4 ,this law of ,karma has now become a fundamental verity of modern science4 ,it is called by different names3 the scientists call it the law of causation1 the law of compensation1 the law of retribution1 the law of action and reaction1 but they all refer to the same idea1--that every cause must produce a similar result and every action must produce a similar reaction4 ,now these ancient thinkers of ,india applied this law of ,karma to explain the destiny of human souls1 and it was upon this law they based the theory of ,transmigration4 ,they maintained that human souls are bound by this irresistible law and cannot get out of it2 their thoughts and deeds are the causes which produce results of similar nature4 ,so their future birth does not depend upon their whimsical1 free choice1 but it is limited by the thoughts and deeds or misdeeds of their previous lives4 ,in the ,platonic idea we find that the souls go according to their choice4 ,they may not take a human form if they prefer an animal form1 but in the ,hindu idea of transmigration we find that it is not a result of free choice1 but1 if our thoughts and deeds force us to take a particular form1 then we are subject to the law of ,karma1 which governs our future birth and the evolution of our souls4 ,consequently the ,hindu theory of ,transmigration differs fundamentally from the ,platonic as well as from the ,egyptian idea of ,transmigration4 ,in the ,platonic and ,egyptian theories we see that the souls1 after leaving the body1 enter into another body which is waiting to receive the migrating soul1 but in the ,hindu theory of ,transmigration the body is not waiting to receive the migrating soul1 but on the contrary the soul1 being subject to the laws of evolution1 manufactures the gross material body according to its desires and tendencies4 ,just as a germ of life will develop a grosser form by cellular subdivision1 by growth1 and by assimilation of the environmental conditions1 so the germ of the human soul will manufacture the body by obeying the laws which govern the physical plane4 ,parents are nothing but the channels through which the migrating souls receive their material forms4 ,parents do not create the souls2 they have no power to create4 ,they can only give the suitable environments necessary for manufacturing a gross physical body4 ,the souls come with their tendencies1 with their desires1 and they remain as germs of life4 ,now these germs of life contain vital forces1 sense powers1 psychic powers1 and ethereal particles of matter4 ,at the time of death the soul contracts and withdraws all its powers from the sense organs to its innermost center1 and in that contracted state it leaves the body4 ,but these powers do not leave the soul4 ,by the law of persistence of force and conservation of energy they remain latent in that center until environmental conditions become favorable for their remanifestation4 ,rebirth means the manifestation of the latent powers which exist in the germ of life or in the individual soul4 ,these germs of life are called by different names4 ,leibnitz called them monads and modern scientists call them bioplasms or some such name1 but the ,vedanta philosophers describe them as subtle bodies4 ,these germs or subtle bodies are subject to evolution and growth2 they arise from lower to higher stages of development1 from the mineral through the vegetable to the animal kingdom and eventually they become human beings and then they go on progressing4 ,in the ,platonic theory the idea of progress1 growth or gradual evolution of the soul from the lower to higher stages of existence is entirely excluded1 because1 as ,i have already said1 the migrating substance is of a fixed quantity with fixed qualities1 that is1 these qualities do not change and are not affected by either growth or evolution4 ,they are constant quantities4 ,in order to differentiate these two ideas we should call the ,hindu theory of ,transmigration by the term ,reincarnation4 ,the ,hindu or ,vedantic theory of ,reincarnation1 however1 is not the same as the ,buddhistic theory of ,rebirth1 for the ,buddhists do not believe in the permanence of the soul entity4 ,there is another point where the ,reincarnation theory differs from ,platonic transmigration4 ,according to this theory of ,reincarnation there is growth and evolution of each individual soul from the lower to higher stages of development4 ,the soul or germ of life1 after passing through the lower stages1 comes to the human plane and gains experience and knowledge2 and after coming to the human plane1 it does not retrograde to animal bodies4 ,the ,platonic theory teaches that human souls migrate into animal bodies or angelic bodies and return from the angelic to the human or the animal1 and that some of them prefer to become animals2 while the theory of ,reincarnation1 taking its stand upon the scientific truth of gradual evolution1 teaches that the human souls have already passed through different grades of the animal1 nay1 of the vegetable kingdom1 by the natural process of evolution4 ,after having once received the human organism1 why should a soul choose to go back to the lesser and more imperfect organism of an animal8 ,how is it possible for a lesser manifestation to hold a greater one8 ,why should a greater manifestation choose more limited forms in preference to those of others8 ,this question arises in the ,platonic theory of ,transmigration4 ,therefore1 the ,reincarnation theory1 or the theory of ,transmigration according to the ,hindus1 rejects this idea of the going back of human souls to animal forms4 ,we have already passed in the evolutionary process through the lower grade of animal organisms4 ,now that we have outgrown them why should we go back to them8 ,it is true1 however1 that in ,india there are many uneducated people among the ,hindus who believe that human souls do migrate into animal bodies after death to gain experience and reap the results of their wicked deeds1 being bound by the law of ,karma2 but in the ,platonic theory the law of ,karma plays no part in the transmigration of souls4 ,the educated and thoughtful minds of ,india1 however1 accept the more rational and scientific theory of ,reincarnation4 ,although there are passages in the scriptural writings of the ,hindus which apparently refer to the retrogression of the human soul into animal nature1 still such passages do not necessarily mean that the souls will be obliged to take animal bodies4 ,they may live like animals even when they have human bodies1 as we may find among us many people like cats and dogs and snakes in human form and they are often more vicious than natural cats1 dogs or snakes4 ,they are reaping their own ,karma and manifesting their animal nature1 though physically they look like human beings4 ,this kind of retrogression is possible for one who after reaching the human plane goes backward on account of wicked thoughts and deeds on the animal plane4 ,such a temporary retrogression brings knowledge and helps it in its onward progress toward the manifestation of higher powers on the higher plane of consciousness4 ,all the wicked thoughts and wicked deeds are nothing but the results of our own mistakes4 ,what is sin8 ,sin is nothing but a mistake and it proceeds from ignorance4 ,for instance1 if ,i do not know that fire burns1 ,i may put my finger into it and get burned4 ,the result of this mistake is the burning of the finger and this has taught me once for all that fire burns2 ,i shall never again put my finger into fire4 ,so every mistake is a great teacher in the long run4 ,no one is born so high and perfect as not to commit any mistake or any sin4 ,every mistake like this opens our eyes to the laws of the universe by bringing to us such results as we do not desire4 ,as one life is not enough to gain experience in all the stages of evolution1 we must have to admit the doctrine of the ,reincarnation of the soul for the fulfillment of the ultimate purpose of earthly life4 ,professor ,huxley says3 ,none but hasty thinkers will reject it on the ground of inherent absurdity4 ,like the doctrine of evolution itself that of transmigration has its roots in the world of reality4