,transcrib]'s ,notes ,text pr9t$ 9 italics has be5 transcrib$ betwe5 und]scores4 ,small capitals h be5 replac$ ) ,,all ,,capitals4 ,a c>et foll[$ by a "* repres5ts a sup]script "* 7z 9 ft74 ,m ,transcrib]'s ,notes may be f\nd at ! end ( ?is text4 ,,sex ,,"* ,,! ,,g]man ,,press ,,on 8,,sex ,,& ,,"*40 ,die ,ums*au4--8,dr4 ,otto ,we9+]'s book is de/9$ to place ! relation ( ! sexes 9 a new light4 ,he traces ! contra/ betwe5 man & woman to a s+le pr9ciple1 & makes an attempt to r$uce ! spiritual diff]5ces ( ! sexes to a sy/em40 ,allgeme9e ,wi5] ,m$iz9is*e ,zeitung4--8,an extraord9>y book1 t call$ =? ! le>n$ criticism ( two faculties1 & _h appe>$ 9 a ?ird edition a few mon?s aft] its publication1 be=e ! sci5tific _w _h be5 able to pron\nce ^u x s]i\sly1 n to say f9ally4444 ,a book t w h5ce=? be 9 ! h&s ( e doctor :o has occasion to /udy ! anti!tical "* ( ! two sexes40 ,d] ,volks]zieh]4--8,!re is no aspect ( mod]n ?\ght :i* he 7,we9+]7 has n t\*$ ^u 9 ! c\rse ( 8 inve/igations1 no recess ( ! labyr9?9e mod]n s\l into :i* he does n invite u to glance ) him1 no "q on :i* he has n t\*$1 or to :i* he has n1 inde$1 (f]$ a solution 9 accordance ) 8 own philosophy40 ,allgeme9e ,zeitung4--8,?is book444 is a s5sational "w1 bo? by reason ( its cont5ts & ( ! tragic fate ( its au?or4 ,we9+]1 z is commonly kn[n1 %ot himself 9 ! autumn ( #aijc at ! e>ly age ( tw5ty-?ree1 9 ! h\se 9 ,vi5na :]e ,bee?ov5 _h di$4444 ,b x is ! book itself1 ev5 m ?an its au?or's individuality1 :i* is abnormal4 ,x is no?+ less ?an an attempt to con/ruct a sy/em ( sexual *>act]ology on ! broade/ sci5tific basis1 ) all ! res\rces ( ! mo/ mod]n philosophy40 ,mn*5] ,neue/e ,na*ri*t54--8#8,sex & ,"*1' by ,dr4 ,we9+]1 has none ( ! "* ( a y\?ful "w4 ,! le>n+ reveal$ 9 ?is book1 & inde$ its :ole conception1 are su* t we might take x = ! /r5u\s a*ievem5t ( a lifetime40 ,neues ,wi5] ,tageblatt4--8,a great philosophical1 biological1 & social "q is "h treat$ by a gift$ & le>n$ au?or ) p]fect fre$om & bread?1 yet ) a s]i\sness1 a weal? ( sci5tific k1 t w\ld ensure ! book a place 9 ! front rank1 ev5 7 ! /yle less excell5t1 vivaci\s1 & individual ?an x is40 ,die ,wage4--8,! au?or is a brilliant /yli/4 ,on e page ,i f9d aphorisms1 9 :i* ! =m fits ! ?\ght l a veil ( silv]4 ,& ^! ?\ghts are no ord9>y ones4 ,! writ] goes 8 own way1 he kn[s secret pa?s :i* no man has yet trodd51 & he %r9ks f no ob/acles4 ,he lets himself d[n cauti\sly into ! abyss1 = he has det]m9$ to s\nd ! deepe/ dep?s2 f "t to "t1 h[ev]1 he looks up f ! pit & rejoices 9 ! light ( ! et]nal />s1 ev5 ?\gh !y lie hid f 8 mortal vision4 ,he c>ries 8 argum5ts to _! ultimate conclusion4 ,we rebel aga9/ ^! conclusions1 b we admire ! uncompromis+ logic ( ! ?9k]40 ,,sex ,,"* ,,by ,,otto ,,we9+] ,,au?oris$ ,,translation ,,f ,,! ,,six? ,,g]man ,,edition ,illu/ration ,,london3 ,,william ,,he9emann ,,new ,,york3 ,g4 ,p4 ,,putnam',s ,,sons #aijf ,all rights res]v$ ,copyright1 ,london3 ,william ,he9emann1 #aijf ,copyright1 ,new ,york3 ,g4 ,p4 ,putnam's ,sons1 #aijf ,,publi%]',s ,,note ,on ,octob] #d1 #aijc1 ,otto ,we9+] di$ by 8 own h&1 at ! age ( tw5ty-?ree & a half ye>s4 ,!re is p]haps 9 all hi/ory no o!r in/ance ( a man :o _h produc$ a "w s mature 9 its sci5tific "*1 & s orig9al 9 its philosophical aspect z 8,sex & ,"*0 :5 he 0 no m ?an tw5ty-"o ye>s old4 ,we w n attempt to decide :e!r ?is 0 ! case ( a g5ius1 :o1 in/ead ( develop+ 8 intellectual p[]s gradually 9 ! c\rse ( a lifetime1 conc5trat$ !m 9 "o mighty a*ievem5t1 & !n ca/ (f ! worn-out husk ( ! fle%1 or ( an unhappy y\?1 :o c\ld no long] be> ! burd5 ( 8 own gha/ly k4 8,sex & ,"*0 is und\bt$ly "o ( ^? r>e books t w be /udi$ long aft] its own times1 & ^: influ5ce w n pass away1 b w p5etrate deep] & deep]1 compell+ amazem5t & invit+ reflection 9 /eadily exp&+ circles4 ,x may be not$ ) satisfaction t ! book is by no means 9 h>mony ) contempor>y ?\ght4 ,! discussions1 s mu* 9 fav\r n[adays1 conc]n+ ! emancipation ( wom51 sexuality1 ! relation ( wom5 to culture1 & s =?1 are depriv$ ( _! data by ?is publication2 = "h1 laid d[n ) all ! p5etrat+ acum5 ( ! tra9$ logician1 is a *>act]isation ( sexual types1 8,m0 7! ideal man71 & 8,w0 7! ideal woman71 :i* traces all ! mu* discuss$ psy*ological ph5om5a back to a f9al s\rce1 & actually gives a def9itive solution to ! fem99e problem1 a solution altoge!r ali5 to ! field ( inquiry :]e9 ! answ] has hi!rto be5 s\ght4 ,9 ! sci5ce ( *>act]ology1 "h =mulat$ = ! fir/ "t1 we h a /r5u\s sci5tific a*ievem5t ( ! fir/ importance4 ,all =m] psy*ologies h be5 ! psy*ology ( ! male1 writt5 by m51 & m or less consci\sly applicable only to man z di/+ui%$ f humanity4 8,woman does n betray h] secret10 said ,kant1 & ?is has be5 true till n[4 ,b n[ %e has reveal$ x--by ! voice ( a man4 ,! ?+s wom5 say ab\t !mselves h be5 sugge/$ by m52 !y repeat ! discov]ies1 m or less real1 :i* m5 h made ab\t !m4 ,by a highly orig9al me?od ( analysis1 a man has succe$$ = ! fir/ "t 9 giv+ sci5tific & ab/ract utt]ance to t :i* only "s few great arti/s h sugge/$ by concrete images hi!rto4 ,we9+]1 work+ out an orig9al sy/em ( *>act]ology 7psy*ological typology7 ri* 9 prospective possibilities1 und]took ! con/ruction ( a univ]sal psy*ology ( woman :i* p5etrates to ! ne!rmo/ dep?s1 & is bas$ n only on a va/ sy/ematic ma/]y ( sci5tific k1 b on :at c only be describ$ z an appall+ compreh5sion ( ! fem99e s\l 9 its mo/ secret recesses4 ,?is newly creat$ me?od embraces ! :ole doma9 ( human consci\sness2 rese>* mu/ be c>ri$ out on ! l9es laid d[n by ,nature--9 ?ree /ages1 & f ?ree di/9ct po9ts ( view3 ! biologico-physiological1 ! psy*ologically descriptive1 & ! philosophically appreciative4 ,i w n dwell "h on ! equipm5t ess5tial = su* a task1 ! necess>y comb9ation ( a compreh5sive k ( natural hi/ory ) a m9ute & exhau/ive ma/]y ( psy*ological & philosophical sci5ce--a comb9ation de/9$1 p]haps1 to prove unique4 ,! g5]al *>act]isation ( ! ideal woman1 8,w10 is foll[$ by ! con/ruction ( individual types1 :i* are f9ally resolv$ into two elem5tal figures 7,platonic conceptions to "s ext5t71 ! ,c\rtesan & ! ,"m4 ,^! are diff]5tiat$ by _! pre-occupation ) ! sexual act 7! ma91 & 9 ! ultimate s5se1 sole int]e/ ( 8,w071 9 ! fir/ case1 z an end 9 itself1 9 ! second z ! process :i* results 9 ! possession ( a *ild4 ,! abnormal type1 ! hy/]ical woman1 leads up to a ma/]ly psy*ological 7n physiological7 !ory ( hy/]ia1 :i* is acutely & conv9c+ly def9$ z 8! organic m5dacity ( woman40 ,we9+] himself atta*$ ! highe/ importance to ! e?ico-philosophical *apt]s t conclude 8 "w1 9 :i* he passes f ! special problem ( sexuality to ! problems ( individual tal5t1 g5ius1 /hetics1 memory1 ! ego1 ! ,jewi% race1 & _m o!rs1 ris+ f9ally to ! ultimate logical & moral pr9ciples ( judgm5t4 ,f 8 mo/ univ]sal /&po9t he succe$s 9 e/imat+ woman z a "p ( humanity1 &1 above all1 subjectively4 ,"h he delib]ately comes into %>p conflict ) ! fa%ionable t5d5cies t[>ds an unsci5tific monism & its accompany+ ph5om5a1 pan-sexuality & ! e?ics ( species1 & *>act]ises v aptly ! cu/om>y sup]ficialities ( ! _m non-philosophical mod]n apo/les1 ( :om ,wilhelm ,bls*e & ,ell5 ,key are p]haps ! mo/ repres5tative types4 ,we9+]1 9 defiance ( all reign+ fa%ions1 repres5ts a consolidat$ dualism1 closely relat$ to ! et]nal sy/ems ( ,plato1 ( ,*ri/ianity1 & ( ,kant1 :i* f9ds an orig9al issue 9 a bitt]ly tragic conception ( ! univ]se4 ,ri*>d ,wagn] 7:om ,we9+] calls ! greate/ ( human be+s aft] ,jesus7 gives arti/ic expression 9 8 ,p>sifal to ! conception ,we9+] sets =? sci5tifically4 ,x is1 9 fact1 ! old doctr9e ( ! div9e life & ( r$emption to :i* ! :ole book1 ) its array ( detail1 is consecrat$4 ,9 ,kundry1 ,we9+] recognises ! mo/ pr(\nd conception ( woman 9 all lit]ature4 ,9 h] r$emption by ! spotless ,p>sifal1 ! "y philosoph] sees ! way ( mank9d m>k$ out2 he contra/s ) ?is ! programme ( ! mod]n fem9i/ movem5t1 ) its sup]ficialities & its lies2 & s1 9 conclusion1 ! book returns to ! problem1 :i*1 9 spite ( all its weal? ( ?\ght1 rema9s its gov]n+ idea3 ! problem ( ! sexes & ! possibility ( a moral relation betwe5 !m--a moral relation fundam5tally diff]5t f :at is commonly und]/ood by ! t]m1 ( c\rse4 ,9 ! two *apt]s3 8,! ,nature ( ,woman & h] significance 9 ! ,univ]se10 & 8,woman & ,mank9d10 we dr9k f a f\nta9 ( ! ripe/ wisdom4 ,a tragic & mo/ unhappy m9d reveals itself "h1 & no ?\ghtful man w lay d[n ?is book )\t deep emotion & admiration2 _m1 inde$1 w close x ) almo/ religi\s rev]5ce4 ,,au?or',s ,,preface ,?is book is an attempt to place ! relations ( ,sex 9 a new & decisive light4 ,x is an attempt n to collect ! greate/ possible numb] ( di/+ui%+ *>act]s1 or to arrange into a sy/em all ! results ( sci5tific measur+ & exp]im5t1 b to ref] to a s+le pr9ciple ! :ole contra/ betwe5 man & woman4 ,9 ?is respect ! book diff]s f all o!r works on ! same subject4 ,x does n l+] ov] ?is or t detail1 b presses on to its ultimate goal2 x does n heap inve/igation on inve/igation1 b comb9es ! psy*ical diff]5ces betwe5 ! sexes into a sy/em2 x deals n ) wom51 b ) woman4 ,x sets out1 inde$1 f ! mo/ common & obvi\s facts1 b int5ds to rea* a s+le1 concrete pr9ciple4 ,?is is n 8inductive metaphysics02 x is a gradual approa* to ! he>t ( psy*ology4 ,! inve/igation is n ( details1 b ( pr9ciples2 x does n despise ! laboratory1 al?\gh ! help ( ! laboratory1 ) reg>d to ! deep] problems1 is limit$ z comp>$ ) ! results ( introspective analysis4 ,an arti/ :o wi%es to repres5t ! female =m c con/ruct a type )\t actually giv+ =mal pro( by a s]ies ( measurem5ts4 ,! arti/ does n despise exp]im5tal results2 on ! contr>y1 he reg>ds x z a duty to ga9 exp]i5ce2 b = him ! collection ( exp]im5tal k is m]ely a />t+-po9t = self-exploration1 & 9 art self-exploration is exploration ( ! _w4 ,! psy*ology us$ 9 ?is exposition is purely philosophical1 al?\gh its *>act]i/ic me?od1 ju/ifi$ by ! subject1 is to set out f ! mo/ trivial details ( exp]i5ce4 ,! task ( ! philosoph] diff]s f t ( ! arti/ 9 "o important respect4 ,! "o deals 9 symbols1 ! o!r 9 ideas4 ,art & philosophy /& to "o ano!r z expression & mean+4 ,! arti/ has brea!d 9 ! _w to brea! x out aga92 ! philosoph] has ! _w outside him & he has to absorb x4 ,!re is always some?+ pret5ti\s 9 !ory2 & ! real mean+--:i* 9 a "w ( art is ,nature h]self & 9 a philosophical sy/em is a mu* cond5s$ g5]alisation1 a !sis go+ to ! root ( ! matt] & prov+ itself--appe>s to /rike aga9/ u h>%ly1 almo/ (f5sively4 ,:]e my exposition is anti-fem99e1 & t is ne>ly ev]y:]e1 m5 !mselves w receive x ) little he>t9ess or conviction2 _! sexual egoism makes !m pref] to see woman z !y w\ld l to h h]1 z !y w\ld l h] to be4 ,i ne$ n say t ,i am prep>$ = ! answ] wom5 w h to ! judgm5t ,i h pass$ on _! sex4 ,my inve/igation1 inde$1 turns aga9/ man 9 ! end1 & al?\gh 9 a deep] s5se ?an ! advocates ( wom5's rights c\ld anticipate1 assigns to man ! heavie/ & mo/ real blame4 ,b ?is w help me little & is ( su* a nature t x _c 9 ! smalle/ way rehabilitate me 9 ! m9ds ( wom54 ,! analysis1 h[ev]1 goes fur!r ?an ! assignm5t ( blame2 x rises beyond simple & sup]ficial ph5om5a to heights f :i* !re op5s n only a view into ! nature ( woman & its mean+ 9 ! univ]se1 b also ! relation to mank9d & to ! ultimate & mo/ l(ty problems4 ,a def9ite relation to ! problem ( ,culture is atta9$1 & we rea* ! "p to be play$ by woman 9 ! sph]e ( ideal aims4 ,!re1 also1 :]e ! problems ( ,culture & ( ,mank9d co9cide1 ,i try n m]ely to expla9 b to assign values1 =1 inde$1 9 t region explanation & valuation are id5tical4 ,to su* a wide outlook my inve/igation 0 z x 7 driv51 n delib]ately /e]$1 f ! outset4 ,! inadequacy ( all empirical psy*ological philosophy foll[s directly f empirical psy*ology itself4 ,! respect = empirical k w n be injur$1 b r w ! mean+ ( su* k be deep5$1 if man recognises 9 ph5om5a1 & x is f ph5om5a t he sets out1 any elem5ts assur+ him t !re is some?+ beh9d ph5om5a1 if he espies ! signs t prove ! exi/5ce ( some?+ high] ?an ph5om5a1 some?+ t supports ph5om5a4 ,we may be assur$ ( su* a fir/ pr9ciple1 al?\gh no liv+ man c rea* x4 ,t[>ds su* a pr9ciple ?is book presses & w n flag4 ,)9 ! n>r[ limits to :i* z yet ! problem ( woman & ( woman's rights has be5 conf9$1 !re has be5 no place = ! v5ture to rea* s high a goal4 ,none ! less ! problem is b\nd intimately ) ! deepe/ riddles ( exi/5ce4 ,x c be solv$1 practically or !oretically1 morally or metaphysically1 only 9 relation to an int]pretation ( ! cosmos4 ,compreh5sion ( ! univ]se1 or :at passes = su*1 /&s 9 no opposition to k ( details2 on ! o!r h& all special k acquires a deep] mean+ because ( x4 ,compreh5sion ( ! univ]se is self-creative2 x _c arise1 al?\gh ! empirical k ( e age expects x1 z a syn!sis ( h[ev] great a sum ( empirical k4 ,9 ?is book !re lie only ! g]ms ( a _w-s*eme1 & ^! are alli$ mo/ closely ) ! conceptions ( ,plato1 ,kant & ,*ri/ianity4 ,i h be5 compell$ = ! mo/ "p to fa%ion = myself ! sci5tific1 psy*ological1 philosophical1 logical1 e?ical gr\ndwork4 ,i ?9k t at ! lea/ ,i h laid ! f\ndations ( _m ?+s into :i* ,i c\ld n g fully4 ,i call special att5tion to ! defects ( ?is "p ( my "w because ,i atta* m importance to appreciation ( :at ,i h tri$ to say ab\t ! deepe/ & mo/ g5]al problems ?an to ! int]e/ :i* w c]ta9ly be ar\s$ by my special inve/igation ( ! problem ( woman4 ,! philosophical read] may take x amiss to f9d a treatm5t ( ! l(tie/ & ultimate problems co9cid+ ) ! inve/igation ( a special problem ( no great dignity2 ,i %>e ) him ?is di/a/e4 ,i may say1 h[ev]1 t ,i h treat$ ?r\gh\t ! contra/ betwe5 ! sexes z ! />t+-po9t r ?an ! goal ( my rese>*4 ,! inve/igation has yield$ a h>ve/ ri* 9 its be>+ on ! fundam5tal problems ( logic & _! relations to ! axioms ( ?\ght1 on ! !ory ( /hetics1 ( love1 & ( ! beautiful & ! good1 & on problems su* z individuality & morality & _! relations1 on ! ph5om5a ( g5ius1 ! crav+ = immortality & ,hebraism4 ,naturally ^! compreh5sive int]relations aid ! special problem1 =1 z x is consid]$ f s _m po9ts ( view1 its scope enl>ges4 ,& if 9 ?is wid] s5se x be prov$ t culture c give only ! smalle/ hope = ! nature ( woman1 if ! f9al results are a depreciation1 ev5 a negation ( womanhood1 !re w be no attempt 9 ?is to de/roy :at exi/s1 to humble :at has a value ( its own4 ,horror ( my own de$ w\ld ov]take me 7 ,i "h only de/ructive & _h ,i left only a clean %eet4 ,p]haps ! affirmations 9 my book are less articulate1 b he t has e>s to he> w he> !m4 ,! treatise falls into two p>ts1 ! fir/ biological-psy*ological1 ! second logical-philosophical4 ,x may be object$ t ,i %\ld h done bett] to make two books1 ! "o treat+ ( purely physical sci5ce1 ! o!r introspective4 ,x 0 necess>y to be done ) biology be=e turn+ to psy*ology4 ,! second "p treats ( c]ta9 psy*ical problems 9 a fa%ion totally diff]5t f ! me?od ( any contempor>y naturali/1 & = t reason ,i ?9k t ! removal ( ! fir/ "p ( ! book w\ld h be5 at "s risk to _m read]s4 ,moreov]1 ! fir/ "p ( ! book *all5ges an att5tion & criticism f natural sci5ce possible 9 a few places only 9 ! second "p1 :i* is *iefly introspective4 ,because ! second "p />ts f a conception ( ! univ]se t is anti-positivi/ic1 _m w ?9k x unsci5tific 7al?\gh !re is giv5 a /rong pro( aga9/ ,positivism74 ,= ! pres5t ,i mu/ be cont5t ) ! conviction t ,i h r5d]$ its due to ,biology1 & t ,i h e/abli%$ an endur+ position = non-biological1 non-physiological psy*ology4 ,my inve/igation may be object$ to z 9 c]ta9 po9ts n be+ support$ by en\gh pro(1 b ,i see little =ce 9 su* an objection4 ,= 9 ^! matt]s :at c 8pro(0 mean8 ,i am n deal+ ) ma!matics or ) ! !ory ( cognition 7except ) ! latt] 9 two cases72 ,i am deal+ ) empirical k1 & 9 t "o c d no m ?an po9t to :at exi/s2 9 ?is region pro( means no m ?an ! agreem5t ( new exp]i5ce ) old exp]i5ce1 & x is mu* ! same :e!r ! new ph5om5a h be5 produc$ exp]im5tally by m51 or h come /raight f ! creative h& ( nature4 ,( su* latt] pro(s my book conta9s _m4 ,f9ally1 ,i %\ld l to say t my book1 if ,i may be all[$ to judge x1 is = ! mo/ "p n ( a quality to be und]/ood & absorb$ at ! fir/ glance4 ,i po9t out ?is myself1 to guide & protect ! read]4 ,! less ,i f\nd myself able 9 bo? p>ts ( ! book 7& especially 9 ! second7 to confirm :at n[ passes = k1 ! m anxi\s ,i h be5 to po9t out co9cid5ces :]e ,i f\nd myself 9 agreem5t ) :at has already be5 kn[n & said4 ,i h to ?ank ,pr(essor ,dr4 ,laur5z ,mlln] = ! great assi/ance he has giv5 me1 & ,pr(essor ,dr4 ,fri$ri* ,jodl = ! k9dly int]e/ he has tak5 9 my "w f ! beg9n+4 ,i am specially indebt$ to ! k9d fri5ds :o h help$ me ) correction ( ! pro(s4 ,,cont5ts ,page ,,au?or',s ,,preface ,,to ,,! ,,fir/ ,,g]man ,,edition ix ,,fir/ ,,or ,,prep>atory ,,"p ,,sexual ,,complexity ,,introduction #a ,on ! developm5t ( g5]al conceptions -- ,male & female -- ,contradictions -- ,transitional =ms -- ,anatomy & natural end[m5t -- ,unc]ta9ty ( anatomy ,,*apt] ,i ,,males ,,& ,,females #e ,embryonic neutral condition -- ,rudim5ts 9 ! adult -- ,degrees ( 8gono*orism0 -- ,pr9ciple ( int]m$iate =ms -- ,male & female -- ,ne$ = typical conceptions -- ,resum -- ,e>ly anticipations ,,*apt] ,,ii ,,male ,,& ,,female ,,plasmas #aa ,position ( sexuality -- ,/e5/rup's view adopt$ -- ,sexual *>act]s -- ,int]nal secretions -- ,idioplasm -- ,arrh5oplasm -- ,!lyplasm -- ,v>iations -- ,pro(s f ! effects ( ca/ration -- ,transplantation & transfusion -- ,organo!rapy -- ,individual diff]5ces betwe5 cells -- ,orig9 ( int]m$iate sexual conditions -- ,bra9 -- ,excess ( male bir?s -- ,det]m9ation ( sex -- ,comp>ative pa?ology ,,*apt] ,,iii ,,! ,,laws ,,( ,,sexual ,,attraction #bf ,sexual pref]5ce -- ,probability ( ^! be+ controll$ by a law -- ,fir/ =mula -- ,fir/ int]pretation -- ,pro(s -- ,het]o/ylism -- ,int]pretation ( het]o/ylism -- ,animal k+dom -- ,fur!r laws -- ,second =mula -- ,*emotaxis -- ,resemblances & diff]5ces -- ,goe!1 8elective aff9ities0 -- ,m>riage & free love -- ,effects on prog5y ,,*apt] ,,iv ,,homo-,,sexuality ,,& ,,p$]a/y #de ,homo-sexuals z int]m$iate =ms -- ,inborn or acquir$1 heal?y or diseas$8 -- ,a special in/ance ( ! law ( attraction -- ,all m5 h ! rudim5ts ( homo-sexuality -- ,fri5d%ip & sexuality -- ,animals -- ,failure ( m$ical treatm5t -- ,homo-sexuality1 puni%m5t & e?ics -- ,di/9ction betwe5 homo-sexuality & p$]a/y ,,*apt] ,v ,,! ,,sci5ce ,,( ,,"* ,,& ,,! ,,sci5ce ,,( ,,=m #ec ,pr9ciple ( sexually int]m$iate =ms z fundam5tal pr9ciple ( ! psy*ology ( individuals -- ,simultaneity or p]iodicity8 -- ,me?ods ( psy*ological inve/igation -- ,examples -- ,individualis$ education -- ,conv5tionalis+ -- ,p>allelism betwe5 morphology & *>act]ology -- ,physiognomy & ! pr9ciples ( psy*o-physics -- ,me?od ( ! doctr9e ( v>iation -- ,a new way ( /at+ ! problem -- ,d$uctive morphology -- ,correlation -- ,outlook ,,*apt] ,,vi ,,emancipat$ ,,wom5 #fd ,! woman "q -- ,claim = emancipation & mal5ess -- ,emancipation & homo-sexuality -- ,sexual pref]5ces ( emancipat$ wom5 -- ,physiognomy ( emancipat$ wom5 -- ,o!r celebrat$ wom5 -- ,femal5ess & emancipation -- ,practical rules -- ,g5ius ess5tially male -- ,movem5ts ( wom5 9 hi/orical times -- ,p]iodicity -- ,biology & ! conception ( hi/ory -- ,outlook ( ! woman movem5t -- ,its fundam5tal error ,,second ,,or ,,pr9cipal ,,"p ,,! ,,sexual ,,types ,,*apt] ,i ,,man ,,& ,,woman #gi ,bisexuality & unisexuality -- ,man or woman1 male or female -- ,fundam5tal difficulty 9 *>act]ology -- ,exp]im5t1 analysis ( s5sation & psy*ology -- ,dil!y -- ,conception ( empirical "* -- ,:at is & :at is n ! object ( psy*ology -- ,"* & individuality -- ,problem ( *>act]ology & ! problem ( ! sexes ,,*apt] ,,ii ,,male ,,& ,,female ,,sexuality #he ,! problem ( a female psy*ology -- ,man z ! int]pret] ( female psy*ology -- ,diff]5ces 9 ! sexual impulse -- ,! absorb+ & lib]at+ factors -- ,int5sity & activity -- ,sexual irritability ( wom5 -- ,l>g] field ( ! sexual life 9 woman -- ,local diff]5ces 9 ! p]ception ( sexuality -- ,local & p]iodical cessation ( male sexuality -- ,diff]5ces 9 ! degrees ( consci\sness ( sexuality ,,*apt] ,,iii ,,male ,,& ,,female ,,consci\sness #ic ,s5sation & feel+ -- ,av5>ius' division into 8elem5t0 & 8"*0 -- ,^! insep>able at ! e>lie/ /age -- ,process ( 8cl>ification0 -- ,pres5tim5ts -- ,grades ( und]/&+ -- ,=gett+ -- ,pa?s & organisation -- ,conception ( 8h5ids0 -- ,! h5id z ! simple/1 psy*ical datum -- ,sexual diff]5ces 9 ! organisation ( ! cont5ts ( ! m9d -- ,s5sibility -- ,c]ta9ty ( judgm5t -- ,develop$ consci\sness z a male "* ,,*apt] ,,iv ,,tal5t ,,& ,,g5ius #ajc ,g5ius & tal5t -- ,g5ius & gift$ness -- ,me?ods -- ,compreh5sion ( _m m5 -- ,:at is meant by compreh5d+ m5 -- ,great complexity ( g5ius -- ,p]iods 9 psy*ic life -- ,no disp>agem5t ( fam\s m5 -- ,und]/&+ & notic+ -- ,univ]sal consci\sness ( g5ius -- ,greate/ di/ance f ! h5id /age -- ,a high] grade ( mal5ess -- ,g5ius always univ]sal -- ,! female devoid ( g5ius or ( h]o-wor%ip -- ,gift$ness & sex ,,*apt] ,v ,,tal5t ,,& ,,memory #aad ,organisation & ! p[] ( reproduc+ ?\ghts -- ,memory ( exp]i5ces a sign ( g5ius -- ,rem>ks & conclusions -- ,remembrance & app]ception -- ,capacity = comp>ison & acquisition -- ,reasons = ! mascul9ity ( music1 draw+ & pa9t+ -- ,degrees ( g5ius -- ,relation ( g5ius to ord9>y m5 -- ,autobiography -- ,fix$ ideas -- ,remembrance ( p]sonal creations -- ,cont9u\s & discont9uance memory -- ,cont9uity & piety -- ,pa/ & pres5t -- ,pa/ & future -- ,desire = immortality -- ,exi/+ psy*ological explanations -- ,true orig9 -- ,inn] developm5t ( man until dea? -- ,ontog5etic psy*ology or !oretical biography -- ,woman lack+ 9 ! desire = immortality -- ,fur!r ext5sion ( relation ( memory to g5ius -- ,memory & "t -- ,po/ulate ( timelessness -- ,value z a timeless quality -- ,fir/ law ( ! !ory ( value -- ,pro(s -- ,individuation & duration con/itu5ts ( value -- ,desire = immortality a special case -- ,desire = immortality 9 g5ius connect$ ) timelessness1 by 8 univ]sal memory & ! duration ( 8 creations -- ,g5ius & hi/ory -- ,g5ius & nations -- ,g5ius & language -- ,m5 ( action & m5 ( sci5ce1 n to be call$ m5 ( g5ius -- ,philosoph]s1 f\nd]s ( religion & arti/s h g5ius ,,*apt] ,,vi ,,memory1 ,,logic ,,& ,,e?ics #adb ,psy*ology & 8psy*ologismus0 -- ,value ( memory -- ,!ory ( memory -- ,doctr9es ( practice & ( association -- ,confusion ) recognition -- ,memory peculi> to man -- ,moral significance -- ,lies -- ,transition to logic -- ,memory & ! pr9ciple ( id5tity -- ,memory & ! syllogism -- ,woman non-logical & non-e?ical -- ,intellectual & moral k -- ,! intelligible ego ,,*apt] ,,vii ,,logic1 ,,e?ics ,,& ,,! ,,ego #aec ,critics ( ! conception ( ! ,ego -- ,hume3 ,li*t5b]g1 ,ma* -- ,! ego ( ,ma* & biology -- ,individuation & individuality -- ,logic & e?ics z witnesses = ! exi/5ce ( ! ego -- ,logic -- ,laws ( id5tity & ( contr>ies -- ,_! use & significance -- ,logical axioms z ! laws ( ess5ce -- ,kant & ,fi*te -- ,fre$om ( ?\ght & fre$om ( ! w -- ,e?ics -- ,relation to logic -- ,! psy*ology ( ! ,kantian e?ics -- ,kant & ,nietzs*e ,,*apt] ,,viii ,,! 8,i0 ,,problem ,,& ,,g5ius #afc ,*>act]ology & ! belief 9 ! 8,i0 -- ,awak5+ ( ! ego -- ,jean ,paul1 ,novalis1 ,s*ell+ -- ,! awak5+ ( ! ego & ! view ( ! _w -- ,self-consci\sness & arrogance -- ,! view ( ! g5ius to be m highly valu$ ?an t ( o!r m5 -- ,f9al /atem5ts z to ! idea ( g5ius -- ,! p]sonality ( ! g5ius z ! p]fectly-consci\s microcosm -- ,! naturally-syn!tic activity ( g5ius -- ,significant & symbolical -- ,def9ition ( ! g5ius 9 relation to ord9>y m5 -- ,univ]sality z fre$om -- ,morality or immorality ( g5ius8 -- ,duties t[>ds self & o!rs -- ,:at duty to ano!r is -- ,criticism ( moral sympa?y & social e?ics -- ,und]/&+ ( o!r m5 z ! "o requirem5t ( morality & k -- ,i & ?\ -- ,individualism & univ]salism -- ,morality only 9 monads -- ,! man ( greate/ g5ius z ! mo/ moral man -- ,:y man is -- ,consci\sness & morality -- ,! great crim9al -- ,g5ius z duty & submission -- ,g5ius & crime -- ,g5ius & insanity -- ,man z 8 own creator ,,*apt] ,,ix ,,male ,,& ,,female ,,psy*ology #ahf ,s\llessness ( woman -- ,hi/ory ( ?is k -- ,woman devoid ( g5ius -- ,no mascul9e wom5 9 ! true s5se -- ,! unconnect$ness ( woman's nature due to h] want ( an ego -- ,revision ( ! h5id-!ory -- ,female 8?\ght0 -- ,idea & object -- ,fre$om ( ! object -- ,idea & judgm5t -- ,nature ( judgm5t -- ,woman & tru? z a crit]ion ( ?\ght -- ,woman & logic -- ,woman non-moral1 n immoral -- ,woman & solitude -- ,womanly sympa?y & mode/y -- ,! ego ( wom5 -- ,female vanity -- ,lack ( true self-appreciation -- ,memory = complim5ts -- ,introspection & rep5tance -- ,ju/ice & jeal\sy -- ,"n & individuality -- ,radical diff]5ce betwe5 male & female m5tal life -- ,psy*ology ) & )\t s\l -- ,is psy*ology a sci5ce8 -- ,s\l & psy*ology -- ,problem ( ! influ5ce ( ! psy*ical sexual *>act]s ( ! male or ! female ,,*apt] ,x ,,mo!rhood ,,& ,,pro/itution #bad ,special *>act]ology ( woman -- ,"m & pro/itute -- ,relation ( two types to ! *ild -- ,woman polygam\s -- ,analogies betwe5 mo!rhood & sexuality -- ,mo!rhood & ! race -- ,mat]nal love e?ically indiff]5t -- ,! pro/itute c>eless ( ! race -- ,! pro/itute1 ! crim9al & ! conqu]or -- ,emp]or & pro/itute -- ,motive ( ! pro/itute -- ,coitus an end 9 itself -- ,coquetry -- ,! s5sations ( ! woman 9 coitus 9 relation to ! re/ ( h] life -- ,! pro/itute z ! enemy -- ,! fri5d ( life & its enemy -- ,no pro/itution among/ animals -- ,its orig9 a my/]y ,,*apt] ,,xi ,,erotics ,,& ,,/hetics #bcf ,wom51 & ! hatr$ ( wom5 -- ,erotics & sexuality -- ,platonic love -- ,! idea ( love -- ,beauty ( wom5 -- ,relation to sexual impulse -- ,love & beauty -- ,diff]5ce betwe5 /hetics1 logic & e?ics -- ,modes ( love -- ,projection ph5om5a -- ,beauty & morality -- ,nature & e?ics -- ,natural & arti/ic beauty -- ,sexual love z guilt -- ,hate1 love & morality -- ,creation ( ! devil -- ,love & sympa?y -- ,love & %yness -- ,love & vanity -- ,love ( woman z a means to an end -- ,relation betwe5 ! *ild & love1 ! *ild & sexuality -- ,love & murd] -- ,madonna-wor%ip -- ,madonna1 a male idea1 )\t basis 9 womanhood -- ,woman sexual1 n erotic -- ,s5se ( beauty 9 wom5 -- ,h[ man acts on woman -- ,! fate ( ! woman -- ,:y man loves woman ,,*apt] ,,xii ,,! ,,nature ,,( ,,woman ,,& ,,h] ,,significance ,,9 ,,! ,,univ]se #beb ,mean+ ( womanhood -- ,in/9ct = pair+ or mat*mak+ -- ,man1 & mat*mak+ -- ,high valuation ( coitus -- ,individual sexual impulse1 a special case -- ,womanhood z pair+ or univ]sal sexuality -- ,organic fals5ess ( woman -- ,hy/]ia -- ,diff]5ce betwe5 man & bea/1 woman & man -- ,! high] & l[] life -- ,bir? & dea? -- ,fre$om & happ9ess -- ,happ9ess & man -- ,happ9ess & woman -- ,woman & ! problem ( exi/5ce -- ,non-exi/5ce ( woman -- ,male & female fri5d%ip -- ,pair+ id5tical ) womanhood -- ,:y wom5 mu/ be reg>d$ z human -- ,contra/ betwe5 subject -- ,object1 matt]1 =m1 man1 woman -- ,mean+ ( h5ids -- ,=mation ( woman by man -- ,significance ( woman 9 ! univ]se -- ,man z some?+1 woman z no?+ -- ,psy*ological problem ( ! fe> ( woman -- ,womanhood & crime -- ,creation ( woman by man's crime -- ,woman z 8 own sexuality accept$ by man -- ,woman z ! guilt ( man -- ,:at man's love ( woman is1 9 its deepe/ significance ,,*apt] ,,xiii ,,judaism #cja ,diff]5ces among/ m5 -- ,int]m$iate =ms & racial an?ropology -- ,comp>ison ( ,judaism & femal5ess -- ,judaism z an idea -- ,antisemitism -- ,ri*>d ,wagn] -- ,simil>ities betwe5 ,jews & wom5 -- ,judaism 9 sci5ce -- ,! ,jew n a monad -- ,! ,jew & ! ,engli%man -- ,nature ( hum\r -- ,hum\r & satire -- ,! ,jewess -- ,deepe/ significance ( ,judaism -- ,want ( fai? -- ,! ,jew n non-my/ical1 yet impi\s -- ,want ( e>ne/ness1 & pride -- ,! ,jew z oppos$ to ! h]o -- ,judaism & ,*ri/ianity -- ,orig9 ( ,*ri/ianity -- ,problem ( ! f\nd]s ( religion -- ,*ri/ z ! conqu]or ( ! ,judaism 9 ,himself -- ,! f\nd]s ( religions z ! greate/ ( m5 -- ,conque/ ( inh]5t ,judaism necess>y = all f\nd]s ( religion -- ,judaism & ! pres5t "t -- ,judaism1 femal5ess1 culture & humanity ,,*apt] ,,xiv ,,woman ,,& ,,mank9d #cca ,! idea ( humanity1 & woman z ! mat*-mak] -- ,goe!-wor%ip -- ,womanis+ ( man -- ,virg9ity & purity -- ,male orig9 ( ^! ideas -- ,failure ( woman to und]/& ! erotic -- ,woman's relation to sexuality -- ,coitus & love -- ,woman z ! enemy ( h] own emancipation -- ,asceticism immoral -- ,sexual impulse z a want ( respect -- ,problem ( ! ,jew -- ,problem ( ! woman -- ,problem ( slav]y -- ,moral relation to wom5 -- ,man z ! oppon5t ( emancipation -- ,e?ical po/ulates -- ,two possibilities -- ,! problem ( wom5 z ! problem ( humanity -- ,subjection ( wom5 -- ,p]si/5ce or disappe>ance ( ! human race -- ,true gr\nd ( ! immorality ( ! sexual impulse -- ,e>?ly pat]nity -- ,inclusion ( wom5 9 ! conception ( humanity -- ,! "m & ! education ( ! human race -- ,la/ que/ions ,,index #cea ,,fir/ ,,or ,,prep>atory ,,"p ,,sexual ,,complexity ,,introduction ,all ?\ght beg9s ) conceptions to a c]ta9 ext5t g5]alis$1 & !nce is develop$ 9 two directions4 ,on ! "o h&1 g5]alisations become wid] & wid]1 b9d+ toge!r by common prop]ties a l>g] & l>g] numb] ( ph5om5a1 & s embrac+ a wid] field ( ! _w ( facts4 ,on ! o!r h&1 ?\ght approa*es m closely ! meet+-po9t ( all conceptions1 ! individual1 ! concrete complex unit t[>ds :i* we approa* only by ?9k+ 9 an ev]-n>r[+ circle1 & by cont9ually be+ able to add new specific & diff]5tiat+ attributes to ! g5]al idea1 8?+10 or 8some?+40 ,x 0 kn[n t fi%es =m$ a class ( ! animal k+dom di/9ct f mammals1 birds1 or inv]tebrates1 long be=e x 0 recognis$ on ! "o h& t fi%es might be bony or c>tilag9\s1 or on ! o!r t fi%es1 birds & mammals compos$ a gr\p diff]+ f ! inv]tebrates by _m common *>act]s4 ,! self-ass]tion ( ! m9d ov] ! _w ( facts 9 all its complexity ( innum]able resemblances & diff]5ces has be5 comp>$ ) ! rule ( ! /ruggle = exi/5ce among liv+ be+s4 ,our conceptions /& betwe5 u & reality4 ,x is only /ep by /ep t we c control !m4 ,z 9 ! case ( a madman1 we may fir/ h to ?r[ a net ov] ! :ole body s t "s limit may be set to 8 /ruggles2 & only aft] ! :ole has be5 ?us secur$1 is x possible to att5d to ! prop] re/ra9t ( ea* limb4 ,two g5]al conceptions h come d[n to u f primitive mank9d1 & f ! e>lie/ times h held our m5tal processes 9 _! lea%4 ,_m a "t ^! conceptions h und]gone trivial corrections2 !y h be5 s5t to ! work%op & pat*$ 9 head & limbs2 !y h be5 lopp$ & add$ to1 exp&$ "h1 contract$ !re1 z :5 new ne$s pi]ce ?r\gh & ?r\gh an old law ( suffrage1 bur/+ bond aft] bond4 ,none ! less1 9 spite ( all am5dm5t & alt]ation1 we h /ill to reckon ) ! primitive conceptions1 male & female4 ,x is true t among ^? we call wom5 are "s :o are meagre1 n>r[-hipp$1 angul>1 muscul>1 en]getic1 highly m5talis$2 !re are 8wom50 ) %ort hair & deep voices1 j z !re are 8m50 :o are be>dless & gossip+4 ,we "k1 9 fact1 t !re are unwomanly wom51 man-l wom51 & unmanly1 womani%1 woman-l m54 ,we assign sex to human be+s f _! bir? on "o "* only1 & s come to add contradictory ideas to our conceptions4 ,su* a c\rse is illogical4 ,9 private conv]sation or 9 society1 9 sci5tific or g5]al meet+s1 we h all tak5 "p 9 fro?y discussions on 8,man & ,woman10 or on ! 8,emancipation ( ,wom540 ,!re is a pitiful monotony 9 ! fa%ion accord+ to :i*1 on su* occasions1 8m50 & 8wom50 h be5 treat$ z if1 l r$ & :ite balls1 !y 7 alike 9 all respects save col\r4 ,9 no case has ! discussion be5 conf9$ to an individual case1 & z e "o _h diff]5t individuals 9 _! m9d1 a real agreem5t 0 impossible4 ,z p meant diff]5t ?+s by ! same words1 !re 0 a complete di%>mony betwe5 language & ideas4 ,is x really ! case t all wom5 & m5 are m>k$ (f %>ply f ea* o!r1 ! wom51 on ! "o h&1 alike 9 all po9ts1 ! m5 on ! o!r8 ,x is c]ta9ly ! case t all previ\s treatm5t ( ! sexual diff]5ces1 p]haps unconsci\sly1 has impli$ ?is view4 ,& yet n[h]e else 9 nature is !re su* a yawn+ discont9uity4 ,!re are transitional =ms betwe5 ! metals & non-metals1 betwe5 *emical comb9ations & mixtures1 betwe5 animals & plants1 betwe5 phan]ogams & cryptogams1 & betwe5 mammals & birds4 ,x is only 9 ob$i5ce to ! mo/ g5]al1 practical dem& = a sup]ficial view t we classify1 make %>p divisions1 pick out a s+le tune f ! cont9u\s melody ( nature4 ,b ! old conceptions ( ! m9d1 l ! cu/oms ( primitive comm]ce1 become fooli% 9 a new age4 ,f ! analogies ,i h giv51 ! improbability may h5ce=w>d be tak5 = grant$ ( f9d+ 9 nature a %>p cleavage betwe5 all t is mascul9e on ! "o side & all t is fem99e on ! o!r2 or t a liv+ be+ is s simple 9 ?is respect t x c be put :olly on "o side or ! o!r ( ! l9e4 ,matt]s are n s cle>4 ,9 ! controv]sy z to ! woman "q1 appeal has be5 made to ! arbitration ( anatomy1 9 ! hope t by t aid a l9e c\ld be drawn betwe5 ^? *>act]s ( males or females t are unalt]able because inborn1 & ^? t are acquir$4 7,x 0 a /range adv5ture to attempt to decide ! diff]5ces betwe5 ! natural end[m5t ( m5 & wom5 on anatomical results2 to suppose t if all o!r inve/igation fail$ to e/abli% ! diff]5ce1 ! matt] c\ld be settl$ by a few m gra9s ( bra9-weight on ! "o side47 ,h[ev]1 ! answ] ( ! anatomi/s is cle> en\gh1 :e!r x ref] to ! bra9 or to any o!r portion ( ! body2 absolute sexual di/9ctions betwe5 all m5 on ! "o side & all wom5 on ! o!r d n exi/4 ,al?\gh ! skeleton ( ! h& ( mo/ m5 is diff]5t f t ( mo/ wom5 yet ! sex _c be det]m9$ ) c]ta9ty ei!r f ! skeleton or f an isolat$ "p ) its muscles1 t5dons1 sk91 blood & n]ves4 ,! same is true ( ! *e/1 sacrum or skull4 ,& :at are we to say ( ! pelvis1 t "p ( ! skeleton 9 :i*1 if any:]e1 /rik+ sexual diff]5ces exi/8 ,x is almo/ univ]sally believ$ t 9 ! "o case ! pelvis is adapt$ = ! act ( p>turition1 9 ! o!r case is n s adapt$4 ,& yet ! "* ( ! pelvis _c be tak5 z an absolute crit]ion ( sex4 ,!re are to be f\nd1 & ! wayf>] kn[s ?is z well z ! anatomi/1 _m wom5 ) n>r[ male-l pelves & _m m5 ) ! broad pelves ( wom54 ,are we !n to make no?+ ( sexual diff]5ces8 ,t w\ld imply1 almo/1 t we c\ld n di/+ui% betwe5 m5 & wom54 ,f :at qu>t] are we to seek help 9 our problem8 ,! old doctr9e is insuffici5t1 & yet we _c make %ift )\t x4 ,if ! receiv$ ideas d n suffice1 x mu/ be our task to seek out new & bett] guides4 ,,*apt] ,i 8,,males0 ,,& 8,,females0 ,9 ! wide/ treatm5t ( mo/ liv+ ?+s1 a blunt sep>ation ( !m into males or females no long] suffices = ! kn[n facts4 ,! limitations ( ^! conceptions h be5 felt m or less by _m writ]s4 ,! fir/ purpose ( ?is "w is to make ?is po9t cle>4 ,i agree ) o!r au?ors :o1 9 a rec5t treatm5t ( ! facts connect$ ) ?is subject1 h tak5 z a />t+-po9t :at has be5 e/abli%$ by embryology reg>d+ ! exi/5ce 9 human be+s1 plants1 & animals ( an embryonic /age neutral z reg>ds sex4 ,9 ! case ( a human embryo ( less ?an five weeks1 = in/ance1 ! sex to :i* x w\ld aft]w>ds belong _c be recognis$4 ,9 ! fif? week ( ftal life processes beg9 :i*1 by ! end ( ! fif? mon? ( pregnancy1 h turn$ ! g5ital rudim5ts1 at fir/ alike 9 ! sexes1 into "o sex & h det]m9$ ! sex ( ! :ole organism4 ,! details ( ^! processes ne$ n be describ$ m fully "h4 ,x c be %[n t h[ev] di/9ctly unisexual an adult plant1 animal or human be+ may be1 !re is always a c]ta9 p]si/5ce ( ! bisexual "*1 nev] a complete disappe>ance ( ! *>act]s ( ! undevelop$ sex4 ,sexual diff]5tiation1 9 fact1 is nev] complete4 ,all ! peculi>ities ( ! male sex may be pres5t 9 ! female 9 "s =m1 h[ev] weakly develop$2 & s also ! sexual *>act]i/ics ( ! woman p]si/ 9 ! man1 al?\gh p]haps !y are n s completely rudim5t>y4 ,! *>act]s ( ! o!r sex occur 9 ! "o sex 9 a ve/igial =m4 ,?us1 9 ! case ( human be+s1 9 :i* our int]e/ is greate/1 to take an example1 x w be f\nd t ! mo/ womanly woman has a gr[? ( col\rless hair1 kn[n z 8lanugo0 9 ! position ( ! male be>d2 & 9 ! mo/ manly man !re are develop$ "u ! sk9 ( ! brea/ masses ( gl&ul> tissue connect$ ) ! nipples4 ,?is condition ( ?+s has be5 m9utely inve/igat$ 9 ! true g5ital organs & ducts1 ! region call$ ! 8ur9o-g5ital tract10 & 9 ea* sex !re has be5 f\nd a complete b rudim5t>y set ( p>allels to ! organs ( ! o!r sex4 ,^! embryological conclusions c be br\ght into relation ) ano!r set ( facts4 ,haeckel has us$ ! ^w 8gono*orism0 = ! sep>ation ( ! sexes1 & 9 diff]5t classes & gr\ps ( creatures diff]5t degrees ( gono*orism may be not$4 ,diff]5t k9ds ( animals & plants may be di/+ui%$ by ! ext5t to :i* ! *>act]s ( "o sex are rudim5t>y 9 ! o!r4 ,! mo/ extreme case ( sexual diff]5tiation1 ! %>pe/ gono*orism1 occurs 9 sexual dimorphism1 t is to say1 9 t condition ( affairs 9 :i* 7z = in/ance 9 "s wat]-fleas7 ! males & females ( ! same species diff] z mu* or ev5 m f ea* o!r z ! memb]s ( diff]5t species1 or g5]a4 ,!re is n s %>ply m>k$ gono*orism among/ v]tebrates z 9 ! case ( cru/acea or insects4 ,among/ ! =m] !re does n exi/ a di/9ction betwe5 males & females s complete z to rea* sexual dimorphism4 ,a condition mu* m frequ5t among/ !m is ! occurr5ce ( =ms int]m$iate 9 reg>d to sex1 :at is call$ abnormal h]maphroditism2 :il/ 9 c]ta9 fi%es h]maphroditism is ! normal condition4 ,i mu/ po9t out "h t x mu/ n be assum$ t !re exi/ only extreme males ) scanty remnants ( ! female condition1 extreme females ) traces ( ! male1 h]maphrodite or transitional =ms1 & wide gaps betwe5 ^! conditions4 ,i am deal+ specially ) human be+s1 b :at ,i h to say ( !m might be appli$1 ) m or less modification1 to ne>ly all creatures 9 :i* sexual reproduction takes place4 ,among/ human be+s ! /ate ( ! case is z foll[s3 ,!re exi/ all sorts ( int]m$iate conditions betwe5 male & female--sexual transitional =ms4 ,9 physical inquiries an 8ideal gas0 is assum$1 t is to say1 a gas1 ! behavi\r ( :i* foll[s ! law ( ,boyle-,gay-,lussac exactly1 al?\gh1 9 fact1 no su* gas exi/s1 & laws are d$uc$ f ?is s t ! deviations f ! ideal laws may be e/abli%$ 9 ! case ( actually exi/+ gases4 ,9 ! same fa%ion we may suppose ! exi/5ce ( an ideal man1 ,m1 & ( an ideal woman1 ,w1 z sexual types al?\gh ^! types d n actually exi/4 ,su* types n only c be con/ruct$1 b mu/ be con/ruct$4 ,z 9 art s 9 sci5ce1 ! real purpose is to rea* ! type1 ! ,platonic ,idea4 ,! sci5ce ( physics inve/igates ! behavi\r ( bodies t are absolutely rigid or absolutely ela/ic1 9 ! full k t nei!r ! "o nor ! o!r actually exi/s4 ,! int]m$iate conditions actually exi/+ betwe5 ! two absolute /ates ( matt] s]ve m]ely z a />t+-po9t = inve/igation ( ! 8types0 & 9 ! practical application ( ! !ory are treat$ z mixtures & exhau/ively analys$4 ,s also !re exi/ only ! int]m$iate /ages betwe5 absolute males & females1 ! absolute conditions nev] pres5t+ !mselves4 ,let x be not$ cle>ly t ,i am discuss+ ! exi/5ce n m]ely ( embryonic sexual neutrality1 b ( a p]man5t bisexual condition4 ,nor am ,i tak+ into consid]ation m]ely ^? int]m$iate sexual conditions1 ^? bodily or psy*ical h]maphrodites ^u :i*1 up to ! pres5t1 att5tion has be5 conc5trat$4 ,9 ano!r respect my conception is new4 ,until n[1 9 deal+ ) sexual int]m$iates1 only h]maphrodites 7 consid]$2 z if1 to use a physical analogy1 !re 7 9 betwe5 ! two extremes a s+le gr\p ( int]m$iate =ms1 & n an int]v5+ tract equally beset ) /ages 9 diff]5t degrees ( transition4 ,! fact is t males & females are l two sub/ances comb9$ 9 diff]5t proportions1 b ) ei!r elem5t nev] :olly miss+4 ,we f9d1 s to speak1 nev] ei!r a man or a woman1 b only ! male condition & ! female condition4 ,any individual1 8,a0 or 8,b10 is nev] to be designat$ m]ely z a man or a woman1 b by a =mula %[+ t x is a composite ( male & female *>act]s 9 diff]5t proportions1 = in/ance1 z foll[s3 ,m ,w ,a ,b ,w ,m always rememb]+ t ea* ( ! factors 1 1 1 mu/ be great] ?an #j & less ?an unity4 ,fur!r pro(s ( ! validity ( ?is conception are num]\s1 & ,i h already giv51 9 ! preface1 a few ( ! mo/ g5]al4 ,we may recall ! exi/5ce ( 8m50 ) female pelves & female brea/s1 ) n>r[ wai/s1 ov]gr[? ( ! hair ( ! head2 or ( 8wom50 ) small hips & flat brea/s1 ) deep bass voices & be>ds 7! pres5ce ( hair on ! *9 is m common ?an is suppos$1 z wom5 naturally are at pa9s to remove x2 ,i am n speak+ ( ! special gr[? t (t5 appe>s on ! faces ( wom5 :o h rea*$ middle age74 ,all su* peculi>ities1 _m ( !m co9cid+ 9 ! same individuals1 are well kn[n to doctors & anatomi/s1 al?\gh _! g5]al significance has n be5 und]/ood4 ,"o ( ! mo/ /rik+ pro(s ( ! view t ,i h be5 unfold+ is pres5t$ by ! great range ( num]ical v>iation to be f\nd :]e sexual *>act]s h be5 measur$ ei!r by ! same or by diff]5t an?ropological or anatomical work]s4 ,! figures obta9$ by measur+ female *>act]s d n beg9 :]e ^? got f males leave (f1 b ! two sets ov]lap4 ,! m obvi\s ?is unc]ta9ty 9 ! !ory ( sexual int]m$iate =ms may be1 ! m is x to be deplor$ 9 ! int]e/s ( true sci5ce4 ,anatomi/s & an?ropologi/s ( ! ord9>y type h by no means /riv5 aga9/ ! sci5tific repres5tation ( ! sexual types1 b z = ! mo/ "p !y reg>d$ measurem5ts z ! be/ indications1 !y 7 ov]:elm$ ) ! numb] ( exceptions1 & ?us1 s f>1 measurem5t has br\ght only vague & indef9ite results4 ,! c\rse ( /ati/ical sci5ce1 :i* m>ks (f our indu/rial age f e>li] times1 al?\gh p]haps on acc\nt ( its di/ant relation to ma!matics x has be5 reg>d$ z specially sci5tific1 has 9 reality h9d]$ ! progress ( k4 ,x has dealt ) av]ages1 n ) types4 ,x has n be5 recognis$ t 9 pure1 z oppos$ to appli$1 sci5ce x is ! type t mu/ be /udi$4 ,& s ^? :o are conc]n$ ) ! type mu/ turn _! backs on ! me?ods & conclusions ( curr5t morphology & physiology4 ,! real measurem5ts & inve/igations ( details h yet to be made4 ,^? t n[ exi/ are inapplicable to true sci5ce4 ,k mu/ be obta9$ ( male & female by means ( a "r con/ruction ( ! ideal man & ! ideal woman1 us+ ! ^w ideal 9 ! s5se ( typical1 exclud+ judgm5t z to value4 ,:5 ^! types h be5 recognis$ & built up we %all be 9 a position to consid] individual cases1 & _! analysis z mixtures 9 diff]5t proportions w be nei!r difficult n fruitless4 ,i %all n[ give a summ>y ( ! cont5ts ( ?is *apt]4 ,liv+ be+s _c be describ$ bluntly z ( "o sex or ! o!r4 ,! real _w f ! po9t ( view ( sex may be reg>d$ z sway+ betwe5 two po9ts1 no actual individual be+ at ei!r po9t1 b some:]e betwe5 ! two4 ,! task ( sci5ce is to def9e ! position ( any individual betwe5 ^! two po9ts4 ,! absolute conditions at ! two extremes are n metaphysical ab/ractions above or outside ! _w ( exp]i5ce1 b _! con/ruction is necess>y z a philosophical & practical mode ( describ+ ! actual _w4 ,a pres5tim5t ( ?is bisexuality ( life 7d]iv$ f ! actual abs5ce ( complete sexual diff]5tiation7 is v old4 ,traces ( x may be f\nd 9 ,*9ese my?s1 b x became active 9 ,greek ?\ght4 ,we may recall ! my?ical p]sonification ( bisexuality 9 ! ,h]maphroditos1 ! n>rative ( ,ari/ophanes 9 ! ,platonic dialogue1 or 9 lat] times ! sugge/ion ( a ,gno/ic sect 7,!ophites7 t primitive man 0 a 8man-woman40 ,,*apt] ,,ii ,,male ,,& ,,female ,,plasmas ,! fir/ ?+ expect$ ( a book l ?is1 ! av[$ object ( :i* is a complete revision ( facts hi!rto accept$1 is t x %\ld exp\nd a new & satisfactory acc\nt ( ! anatomical & physiological *>act]s ( ! sexual types4 ,q ap>t f ! ab/ract "q z to :e!r ! complete survey ( a subject s enorm\s is n beyond ! p[]s ( "o individual1 ,i mu/ at once disclaim any int5tion ( mak+ ! attempt4 ,i d n pret5d to h made suffici5t indep5d5t inve/igations 9 a field s wide1 nor d ,i ?9k su* a review necess>y = ! purpose ( ?is book4 ,nor is x necess>y to give a compilation ( ! results set out by o!r au?ors1 = ,havelock ,ellis has already done ?is v well4 ,7 ,i to attempt to rea* ! sexual types by means ( ! probable inf]5ces drawn f 8 collect$ results1 my "w w\ld be a m]e hypo!sis & sci5ce might h be5 sp>$ a new book4 ,! argum5ts 9 ?is *apt]1 !re=e1 w be ( a r =mal & g5]al nature2 !y w relate to biological pr9ciples1 b to a c]ta9 ext5t w lay /ress on ! ne$ = a clos] inve/igation ( c]ta9 def9ite po9ts1 "w :i* mu/ be left to ! future1 b :i* may be r5d]$ m easy by my indications4 ,^? :o "k little ( ,biology may scan ?is section ha/ily1 & yet run little risk ( fail+ to und]/& :at foll[s4 ,! doctr9e ( ! exi/5ce ( diff]5t degrees ( mascul9ity & fem99ity may be treat$1 9 ! fir/ place1 on purely anatomical l9es4 ,n only ! anatomical =m1 b ! anatomical position ( male & female *>act]s mu/ be discuss$4 ,! examples already giv5 ( sexual diff]5ces 9 o!r p>ts ( ! body %[$ t sexuality is n limit$ to ! g5ital organs & gl&s4 ,b :]e are ! limits to be plac$8 ,d !y n rea* beyond ! prim>y & second>y sexual *>act]s8 ,9 o!r words1 :]e does sex display itself1 & :]e is x )\t influ5ce8 ,_m po9ts came to light 9 ! la/ decade1 :i* br+ fre% support to a !ory fir/ put =w>d 9 #ahdj1 b :i* at ! "t f\nd little support s9ce x appe>$ to be 9 direct opposition to facts held z e/abli%$ alike by ! au?or ( ! !ory & by 8 oppon5ts4 ,! !ory 9 "q1 fir/ sugge/$ by ! zoologi/ ,j4 ,j4 ,s4 ,/e5/rup1 ( ,cop5hag51 b s9ce support$ by _m o!rs1 is t sexual *>act]s are pres5t 9 e "p ( ! body4 ,ellis has collect$ ! results ( inve/igations on almo/ e tissue ( ! body1 :i* s]ve to %[ ! univ]sal pres5ce ( sexual diff]5ces4 ,x is pla9 t !re is a /rik+ diff]5ce 9 ! coloration ( ! typical male & female4 ,?is fact e/abli%es ! exi/5ce ( sexual diff]5ces 9 ! sk9 7cutis7 & 9 ! blood-vessels1 & also 9 ! bulk ( ! col\r+-matt] 9 ! blood & 9 ! numb] ( r$ corpuscles to ! cubic c5timetre ( ! blood fluid4 ,bis*(f & ,rud+] h prov$ ! exi/5ce ( sexual diff]5ces 9 bra9 weight1 & m rec5tly ,ju/us & ,alice ,gaule h obta9$ a simil> result ) reg>d to su* vegetative organs z ! liv]1 lungs & sple54 ,9 fact1 all p>ts ( a woman1 al?\gh 9 diff]5t degrees 9 diff]5t zones1 h a sexual /imulus = ! male organism1 & simil>ly all p>ts ( ! male h _! effect on ! female4 ,! direct logical inf]5ce may be drawn1 & is support$ by abundant facts1 t e cell 9 ! body is sexually *>act]i/ic & has its def9ite sexual significance4 ,i may n[ add to ! pr9ciple already laid d[n 9 ?is book1 ( ! univ]sal pres5ce ( sexually int]m$iate conditions1 t ^! conditions may pres5t diff]5t degrees ( developm5t4 ,su* a conception ( ! exi/5ce ( diff]5t degrees ( developm5t 9 sexuality makes x easy to und]/& cases ( false h]maphroditism or ev5 ( ! true h]maphroditism1 :i*1 s9ce ! "t ( ,/e5/rup1 has be5 e/abli%$ = s _m plants & animals1 al?\gh n c]ta9ly 9 ! case ( man4 ,/e5/rup wrote3 8,if ! sex ( an animal has its seat only 9 ! g5ital organs1 !n "o might ?9k x possible = an animal really to be bisexual1 if x _h at ! same "t two sets ( sexual organs4 ,b sex is n limit$ to "o region1 x manife/s itself n m]ely by ! pres5ce ( c]ta9 organs2 x p]vades ! :ole be+ & %[s itself 9 e po9t4 ,9 a male body1 ev]y?+ d[n to ! smalle/ "p is male1 h[ev] mu* x may resemble ! correspond+ female "p1 & s also 9 ! female ! smalle/ "p is female4 ,! pres5ce ( male & female sexual organs 9 ! same body w\ld make ! body bisexual only if bo? sexes rul$ ! :ole body & made !mselves manife/ 9 e po9t1 & su* a condition1 z ! manife/ations ( ! sexes are oppos+ =ces1 w\ld result simply 9 ! negation ( sex 9 ! body 9 "q40 ,if1 h[ev]1 ! pr9ciple ( ! exi/5ce ( innum]able sexually transitional conditions be ext5d$ to all ! cells ( ! body1 & empirical k supports su* a view1 ,/e5/rup's difficulty is resolv$1 & h]maphroditism no long] appe>s to be unnatural4 ,!re may be conceiv$ = e cell all conditions1 f complete mascul9ity ?r\gh all /ages ( dim9i%+ mascul9ity to its complete abs5ce & ! consequ5t pres5ce ( complete fem99ity4 ,:e!r we are to ?9k ( ^! gradations 9 ! scale ( sexual diff]5tiation z dep5d+ on two real sub/ances unit$ 9 diff]5t proportions1 or z a s+le k9d ( protoplasm modifi$ 9 diff]5t ways 7z1 = in/ance1 by diff]5t spatial dispositions ( its molecules71 x 7 wis] n to guess4 ,! fir/ conception is difficult to apply physiologically2 x is extremely difficult to imag9e t two sets ( conditions %\ld be able to produce ! ess5tial physiological simil>ities ( two bodies1 "o ) a male & ! o!r a female dia!sis4 ,! second view recalls too vividly c]ta9 un=tunate speculations on h]$ity4 ,p]haps bo? views are equally f> f ! tru?4 ,at pres5t empirical k does n enable u to say :]e9 ! mascul9ity or ! fem99ity ( a cell really lies1 or to def9e ! hi/ological1 molecul> or *emical diff]5ces :i* di/+ui% e cell ( a male f e cell ( a female4 ,)\t anticipat+ any discov]y ( ! future 7x is pla9 already1 h[ev]1 t ! specific ph5om5a ( liv+ matt] are n go+ to be ref]r$ to *emi/ry & physics71 x may be tak5 = grant$ t individual cells possess sexuality 9 diff]5t degrees q ap>t f ! sexuality ( ! :ole body4 ,womani% m5 usually h ! sk9 s(t]1 & 9 !m ! cells ( ! male organs h a less5$ p[] ( division ^u :i* dep5ds directly ! poor] developm5t ( ! male macroscopic *>act]s4 ,! di/ribution ( sexual *>act]s af=ds an important pro( ( ! appe>ance ( sexuality 9 diff]5t degrees4 ,su* *>act]s 7at lea/ 9 ! animal k+dom7 may be arrang$ accord+ to ! /r5g? ( _! excit+ influ5ce on ! opposite sex4 ,to avoid confusion1 ,i %all make use ( ,john ,hunt]'s t]ms = classify+ sexual *>act]s4 ,! primordial sexual *>act]s are ! male & female g5ital gl&s 7te/es & epididymis1 ov>ies & epoophoron72 ! prim>y sexual *>act]s are ! int]nal app5dages ( ! sexual gl&s 7vasa def]5tia vesicul sem9ales1 oviducts & ut]us71 :i* may h sexual *>act]s q di/9ct f ^? ( ! gl&s & ! ext]nal sexual organs1 accord+ to :i* alone ! sex ( human be+s is reckon$ at bir? 7sometimes q errone\sly1 z ,i %all %[7 & _! consequ5t fate 9 life decid$4 ,aft] ! prim>y1 come all ^? sexual *>act]s n directly necess>y to reproduction4 ,su* second>y sexual *>act]s are be/ def9$ z ^? :i* beg9 to appe> at pub]ty1 & :i* _c be develop$ except "u ! influ5ce on ! sy/em ( ! int]nal secretions ( ! g5ital gl&s4 ,examples ( ^! are ! be>ds 9 m51 ! luxuriant gr[? ( hair 9 wom51 ! developm5t ( ! mamm>y gl&s1 ! "* ( ! voice4 ,z a conv5i5t mode ( treatm5t1 & = practical r ?an !oretical reasons1 c]ta9 inh]it$ *>act]s1 su* z ! developm5t ( muscul> /r5g? or ( m5tal ob/9acy may be reckon$ z t]ti>y sexual *>act]s4 ,"u ! designation 8quat]n>y sexual *>act]s0 may be plac$ su* accessories z relative social position1 diff]5ce 9 habit1 mode ( livelihood1 ! smok+ & dr9k+ habit 9 man1 & ! dome/ic duties ( wom54 ,all ^! *>act]s possess a pot5t & direct sexual influ5ce1 & 9 my op9ion (t5 may be reckon$ ) ! t]ti>y *>act]s or ev5 ) ! second>y4 ,?is classification ( sexual *>act]s mu/ n be tak5 z imply+ a def9ite *a9 ( sequ5ce1 nor mu/ x be assum$ t ! m5tal sexual *>act]s ei!r det]m9e ! bodily *>act]s or are det]m9$ by !m 9 "s causal nexus4 ,! classification relates only to ! /r5g? ( ! excit+ influ5ce on ! o!r sex1 to ! ord] 9 "t 9 :i* ?is influ5ce is ex]t$1 & to ! degree ( c]ta9ty ) :i* ! ext5t ( ! influ5ce may be pr$ict$4 ,/udy ( second>y sexual *>act]s is b\nd up ) consid]ation ( ! effect ( int]nal secretions ( ! g5ital gl&s on g5]al metabolism4 ,! relation ( ?is influ5ce or its abs5ce 7z 9 ! case ( artificially ca/rat$ animals7 has be5 trac$ out 9 ! degree ( developm5t ( ! second>y *>act]s4 ,! int]nal secretions1 h[ev]1 und\bt$ly h an influ5ce on all ! cells ( ! body4 ,?is is cle>ly %[n by ! *anges :i* occur at pub]ty 9 all p>ts ( ! body1 & n only 9 ! seats ( ! second>y sexual *>act]s4 ,z a matt] ( fact1 ! int]nal secretions ( all ! gl&s mu/ be reg>d$ z affect+ all ! tissues4 ,! int]nal secretions ( ! g5ital gl&s mu/ be reg>d$ z complet+ ! sexuality ( ! individual4 ,e cell mu/ be consid]$ z possess+ an orig9al sexuality1 to :i* ! influ5ce ( ! int]nal secretion 9 suffici5t quantity is ! f9al det]m9+ condition "u ! influ5ce ( :i* ! cell acquires its f9al det]m9ate "* z male or female4 ,! g5ital gl&s are ! organs 9 :i* ! sex ( ! individual is mo/ obvi\s1 & 9 ! compon5t cells ( :i* x is mo/ conspicu\sly visible4 ,at ! same "t x mu/ be not$ t ! di/+ui%+ *>act]s ( ! species1 race & family to :i* an organism belongs are also be/ m>k$ 9 ! g5ital cells4 ,j z ,/e5/rup1 on ! "o h&1 0 "r 9 tea*+ t sex ext5ds all ov] ! body & is n conf9$ to ! g5ital organs1 s1 on ! o!r h&1 ,naegeli1 de ,vries1 ,osk> ,h]twig & o!rs h prop\nd$ ! important !ory1 & support$ x by weighty argum5ts1 t e cell 9 a multi-cellul> organism possesses a comb9ation ( ! *>act]s ( its species & race1 b t ^! *>act]s are1 z x 71 specially cond5s$ 9 ! sexual cells4 ,probably ?is view ( ! case w come to be accept$ by all inve/igators1 s9ce e liv+ be+ owes its orig9 to ! cleavage & multiplication ( a s+le cell4 ,_m ph5om5a1 among/ :i* may be notic$ specially exp]im5ts on ! reg5]ation ( lo/ p>ts & inve/igations into ! *emical diff]5ces betwe5 ! correspond+ tissues ( ne>ly alli$ animals1 h l$ ! inve/igators to :om ,i h j ref]r$ to conceive ! exi/5ce ( an 8,idioplasm10 :i* is ! be>] ( ! specific *>act]s1 & :i* exi/s 9 all ! cells ( a multi-cellul> animal1 q ap>t f ! purposes ( reproduction4 ,9 a simil> fa%ion ,i h be5 l$ to ! conception ( an 8,arrh5oplasm0 7male plasm7 & a 8,!lyplasm0 7female plasm7 z ! two modes 9 :i* ! idioplasm ( e bisexual organism may appe>1 & :i* are to be consid]$1 because ( reasons :i* ,i %all expla91 z ideal conditions betwe5 :i* ! actual conditions always lie4 ,actually exi/+ protoplasm is to be ?\ght ( z mov+ f an ideal arrh5oplasm ?r\gh a real or imag9>y indiff]5t condition 7true h]maphroditism7 t[>ds a protoplasm t approa*es1 b nev] actually rea*es1 an ideal !lyplasm4 ,?is conception br+s to a po9t :at ,i h be5 try+ to say4 ,i apologise = ! new t]ms1 b !y are m ?an devices to call att5tion to a new idea4 ,! pro( t e s+le organ1 & fur!r1 t e s+le cell possesses a sexuality ly+ some:]e betwe5 arrh5oplasm & !lyplasm1 & fur!r1 t e cell receiv$ an orig9al sexual end[m5t def9ite 9 k9d & degree1 is to be f\nd 9 ! fact t ev5 9 ! same organism ! diff]5t cells d n always possess _! sexuality id5tical 9 k9d & degree4 ,9 fact ea* cell ( a body nei!r conta9s ! same proportion ( ,m & ,w nor is at ! same approximation to arrh5oplasm or !lyplasm2 simil> cells ( ! same body may inde$ lie on diff]5t sides ( ! sexually neutral po9t4 ,if1 in/ead ( writ+ 8mascul9ity0 & 8fem99ity0 at l5g?1 we *oose signs to express ^!1 & )\t any malici\s int5tion *oose ! positive sign 77 = ,m & ! negative 7-7 = ,w1 !n our proposition may be express$ z foll[s3 ,! sexuality ( ! diff]5t cells ( ! same organism diff]s n only 9 absolute quantity b is to be express$ by a diff]5t sign4 ,!re are _m m5 ) a poor gr[? ( be>d & a weak muscul> developm5t :o are o!rwise typically males2 & s also _m wom5 ) badly develop$ brea/s are o!rwise typically womanly4 ,!re are womani% m5 ) /rong be>ds & mascul9e wom5 ) abnormally %ort hair :o none ! less possess well-develop$ brea/s & broad pelves4 ,i "k sev]al m5 :o h ! upp] "p ( ! ?igh ( a female ) a normally male "u "p1 & "s ) ! "r hip ( a male & ! left ( a female4 ,9 mo/ cases ^! local v>iations ( ! sexual "* affect bo? sides ( ! body1 al?\gh ( c\rse x is only 9 ideal bodies t !re is complete symmetry ab\t ! middle l9e4 ,! degree to :i* sexuality displays itself1 h[ev]1 z1 = in/ance1 9 ! gr[? ( hair1 is v (t5 unsymmetrical4 ,?is want ( uni=mity 7& ! sexual manife/ations nev] %[ complete uni=mity7 c h>dly dep5d on diff]5ces ( ! int]nal secretion2 = ! blood goes to all ! organs1 hav+ 9 x ! same am\nt ( ! int]nal secretion2 al?\gh diff]5t organs may receive diff]5t quantities ( blood1 9 all normal cases its quality & quantity be+ proportion$ to ! ne$s ( ! "p4 ,7 we n to assume z ! cause ( ^! v>iations ! pres5ce ( a sexual det]m9ant g5]ally diff]5t 9 e cell b /able f its e>lie/ embryonic developm5t1 !n x w\ld be simple to describe ! sexuality ( any individual by e/imat+ h[ f> its sexual gl&s con=m$ to ! normal type ( its sex1 & ! facts w\ld be mu* simpl] ?an !y really are4 ,sexuality1 h[ev]1 _c be reg>d$ z occurr+ 9 an imag9>y normal quantity di/ribut$ equally all ov] an individual s t ! sexual "* ( any cell w\ld be a measure ( ! sexual *>act]s ( any o!r cells4 ,:il/1 z an exception1 !re may occur wide diff]5ces 9 ! sexual *>act]s ( diff]5t cells or organs ( ! same body1 /ill z a rule !re is ! same specific sexuality = all ! cells4 ,9 fact x may be tak5 z c]ta9 t an approximation to a complete uni=mity ( sexual "* ov] ! :ole body is mu* m common ?an ! t5d5cy to any consid]able div]g5ces among/ ! diff]5t organs or /ill m among/ ! diff]5t cells4 ,h[ f> ^! possible v>iations may g c be det]m9$ only by ! inve/igation ( individual cases4 ,!re is a popul> view1 dat+ back to ,ari/otle & support$ by _m doctors & zoologi/s1 t ! ca/ration ( an animal is foll[$ by ! sudd5 appe>ance ( ! *>act]s ( ! o!r sex2 if ! geld+ ( a male 7 to br+ ab\t ! appe>ance ( female *>act]i/ics !n d\bt w\ld be ?r[n on ! exi/5ce 9 e cell ( a primordial sexuality indep5d5t ( ! g5ital gl&s4 ,! mo/ rec5t exp]im5tal results ( ,sellheim & ,foges1 h[ev]1 h %[n t ! type ( a geld$ male is di/9ct f ! female type1 t geld+ does n induce ! fem99e "*4 ,x is bett] to avoid too f>-rea*+ & radical conclusions on ?is matt]2 x may be t a second lat5t gl& ( ! o!r sex may awake into activity & sexually dom9ate ! det]iorat+ organism aft] ! removal or atrophy ( ! normal gl&4 ,!re are _m cases 7too readily int]pret$ z in/ances ( complete assumption ( ! male "*7 9 :i* aft] ! involution ( ! female sexual gl&s at ! climact]ic ! second>y sexual *>act]s ( ! male are acquir$4 ,in/ances ( ?is are ! be>d ( ! human gr&am1 ! occasional appe>ance ( %ort antl]s 9 old does1 or ( a cock's plumage 9 an old h54 ,b su* *anges are practically nev] se5 except 9 association ) s5ile decay or ) op]ative int]f]5ce4 ,9 ! case ( c]ta9 cru/acean p>asites ( fi%1 h[ev] 7! g5]a ,cymo?oa1 ,anilocra & ,n]ocila ( ! family ,cymo?oid71 ! *anges ,i h j m5tion$ are "p ( ! normal life hi/ory4 ,^! creatures are h]maphrodites ( a peculi> k9d2 ! male & female organs co-exi/ 9 !m b are n functional at ! same p]iod4 ,a sort ( prot&ry exi/s2 ea* individual ex]cises fir/ ! functions ( a male & aft]w>ds ^? ( ! female4 ,dur+ ! "t ( _! activity z males !y possess ord9>y male reproductive organs :i* are ca/ (f :5 ! female g5ital ducts & brood organs develop4 ,t simil> conditions may exi/ 9 man has be5 %[n by ^? cases ( 8eviratio0 & 8effem9atio0 :i* ! sexual pa?ology ( ! old age ( m5 has br\ght to light4 ,s also we _c d5y altoge!r ! actual occurr5ce ( a c]ta9 degree ( effem9acy :5 ! crucial op]ation ( extirpation ( ! human te/es has be5 p]=m$4#a ,on ! o!r h&1 ! fact t ! relation is n univ]sal or inevitable1 t ! ca/ration ( an individual does n c]ta9ly result 9 ! appe>ance ( ! *>act]s ( ! o!r sex1 may be tak5 z a pro( t x is necess>y to assume ! orig9al pres5ce ?r\gh\t ! body ( cells det]m9$ by arrh5oplasm or !lyplasm4 #a ,s also 9 ! opposite case2 x _c be :olly d5i$ t ov>iotomy is foll[$ by ! appe>ance ( mascul9e *>act]s4 ,! possession by e cell ( primitive sexuality on :i* ! secretion ( ! sexual gl&s has little effect might be %[n fur!r by consid]ation ( ! effects ( graft+ male g5ital gl&s on female organisms4 ,= su* an exp]im5t to be accurate x w\ld be necess>y t ! animal f :i* ! te/is 0 to be transplant$ %\ld be z ne> ak9 z possible to ! female on :i* ! te/is 0 to be graft$1 z1 = in/ance1 9 ! case ( a bro!r & si/]2 ! idioplasm ( ! two %\ld be z alike z possible4 ,9 ?is exp]im5t mu* w\ld dep5d on limit+ ! conditions ( ! exp]im5t z mu* z possible s t ! results w\ld n be confus$ by conflict+ factors4 ,exp]im5ts made 9 ,vi5na h %[n t :5 an ex*ange ( ! ov>ies has be5 made betwe5 unrelat$ female animals 7*os5 at r&om7 ! atrophy ( ! ov>ies foll[s1 b t !re is no failure ( ! second>y sexual *>act]s 7e4g41 deg5]ation ( ! mamm74 ,moreov]1 :5 ! g5ital gl&s ( an animal are remov$ f _! natural position & graft$ 9 a new position 9 ! same animal 7s t x /ill reta9s its own tissues7 ! full developm5t ( ! second>y sexual *>act]s goes on precisely z if !re _h be5 no int]f]5ce1 at lea/ 9 cases :]e ! op]ation is successful4 ,! failure ( ! transplantation ( ov>ies f "o animal to ano!r may be due to ! abs5ce ( family relation%ip betwe5 ! tissues2 ! influ5ce ( ! idioplasm probably is ( prim>y importance4 ,^! exp]im5ts closely resemble ^? made 9 ! transfusion ( ali5 blood4 ,x is a practical rule ) surgeons t :5 a dang]\s loss ( blood has to be made good1 ! blood requir$ = transfusion mu/ be obta9$ f an individual n only ( ! same species & family1 b also ( ! same sex z t ( ! pati5t4 ,! p>allel betwe5 transfusion & transplantation is at once evid5t4 ,if ,i am correct 9 my views1 :5 surgeons seek to transfuse blood1 in/ead ( be+ cont5t ) injections ( normal salt solution !y mu/ take ! blood n m]ely f "o ( ! same species1 family & sex1 b ( a simil> degree ( mascul9ity or fem99ity4 ,exp]im5ts on transfusion n only l5d support to my belief 9 ! exi/5ce ( sex *>act]s 9 ! blood corpuscles1 b !y furni% additional explanations ( ! failure ( exp]im5ts 9 graft+ ov>ies or te/is on individuals ( ! opposite sex4 ,! int]nal secretions ( ! g5ital gl&s are op]ative only 9 _! appropriate environm5t ( arrh5oplasm or !lyplasm4 ,9 ?is connection1 ,i may say a ^w z to ! curative value ( organo!rapy4 ,al?\gh1 z ,i h %[n to be ! case1 ! transplantation ( fre%ly extirpat$ g5ital gl&s into subjects ( ! opposite sex has no effect1 x does n foll[ t ! injection ( ! ov>ian secretion into ! blood ( a male might n h a mo/ injuri\s effect4 ,on ! o!r h&1 ! pr9ciple ( organo!rapy has be5 oppos$ on ! gr\nd t organic prep>ations procur$ f non-alli$ species c\ld n possibly be expect$ to yield good results4 ,x is m ?an likely t ! m$ical expon5ts ( organo!rapy h lo/ _m valuable discov]ies 9 heal+ because ( _! neglect ( ! biological !ory ( idioplasm4 ,! !ory ( an idioplasm1 ! pres5ce ( :i* gives ! specific race *>act]s to ^? tissues & cells :i* h lo/ ! reproductive faculty1 is by no means g5]ally accept$4 ,b at ! lea/ all mu/ admit t ! race *>act]s are collect$ 9 ! g5ital gl&s1 & t if exp]im5ts ) extracts f ^! are to provide m ?an a good tonic1 ! ne>e/ possible relation%ip betwe5 ! animals exp]im5t$ ^u mu/ be obs]v$4 ,p>allel exp]im5ts might be made z to ! effect ( transplantation ( ! g5ital gl&s & injections ( _! extracts on two ca/rat$ cocks ( ! same /ra94 ,= in/ance1 ! effects ( ! transplantation ( ! te/es ( "o ( !m into any o!r "p ( its own body or p]itoneal cavity or into any simil> "p ( ! o!r cock might be comp>$ ) ! effects ( intrav5\s injection ( te/is extract ( ! "o on ! o!r4 ,su* p>allel inve/igations w\ld also increase our k z to ! mo/ suitable m$ia & quantities ( ! extracts4 ,x is also to be desir$1 f ! !oretical po9t ( view1 t k may be ga9$ z to :e!r ! int]nal secretion ( ! g5ital gl&s ent]s into *emical union ) ! protoplasm ( ! cells or :e!r x acts z a physiological /imulus indep5d5t ( ! quantity suppli$4 ,s f> we "k no?+ t w\ld enable u to come to a def9ite op9ion on ?is po9t4 ,! limit$ influ5ce ( ! int]nal secretions ( ! sexual gl&s 9 =m+ ! sexual *>act]s mu/ be realis$ to w>rant ! !ory ( a prim>y1 g5]ally slight1 diff]5ce 9 ea* cell1 b /ill det]m9ate sexual influ5ce4#b ,if ! exi/5ce ( di/9ct graduations ( ^! prim>y *>act]i/ics 9 all ! cells & tissues c be recognis$1 !re foll[ _m important & f>-rea*+ conclusions4 ,! individual egg-cells & sp]matozoa may be f\nd to possess diff]5t degrees ( mal5ess & femal5ess1 n only 9 diff]5t individuals1 b 9 ! ov>ies & te/es ( ! same individual1 especially at diff]5t times2 = in/ance1 ! sp]matozoa diff] 9 size & activity4 ,we are /ill q ignorant on ^! matt]s1 z no "o has work$ on ! requisite l9es4 #b ,! exi/5ce ( sexual di/9ctions be=e pub]ty %[s t ! p[] ( ! int]nal secretions ( ! sexual gl&s does n acc\nt = ev]y?+4 ,x is extremely int]e/+ to recall 9 ?is connection t _m times diff]5t inve/igators h obs]v$ 9 ! te/es ( amphibia n only ! diff]5t /ages 9 ! developm5t ( sp]matozoa1 b mature eggs4 ,?is int]pretation ( ! obs]vations 0 at fir/ disput$1 & x 0 sugge/$ t ! pres5ce ( unusually l>ge cells 9 ! tubes ( ! te/es _h giv5 rise to ! error1 b ! matt] has n[ be5 fully confirm$4 ,moreov]1 9 ^! ,amphibia1 sexually int]m$iate conditions are v common1 & ?is %\ld lead u to be c>eful 9 mak+ /atem5ts z to ! uni=m pres5ce ( arrh5oplasm or !lyplasm 9 a body4 ,! me?ods ( assign+ sex to a new-born infant seem mo/ unsatisfactory 9 ! light ( ^! facts4 ,if ! *ild is obs]v$ to possess a male organ1 ev5 al?\gh !re may be complete epi- or hypo-spadism1 or a d\ble failure ( desc5t ( ! te/es1 x is at once describ$ z a boy & is h5ce=? treat$ z "o1 al?\gh 9 o!r p>ts ( ! body1 = in/ance 9 ! bra91 ! sexual det]m9ant may be mu* ne>] !lyplasm ?an arrh5oplasm4 ,! soon] a m exact me?od ( sex discrim9ation is insi/$ ^u ! bett]4 ,z a result ( ^! long inductions & d$uctions we may re/ assur$ t all ! cells possess a def9ite prim>y sexual det]m9ant :i* mu/ n be assum$ to be alike or ne>ly alike ?r\gh\t ! same body4 ,e cell1 e cell-complex1 & e organ h _! di/9ctive indices on ! scale betwe5 !lyplasm & arrh5oplasm4 ,= ! exact def9ition ( ! sex1 an e/imation ( ! indices ov] ! :ole body w\ld be necess>y4 ,i %\ld be cont5t to be> ! blame ( all ! !oretical & practical errors 9 ?is book did ,i believe myself to h made ! work+ out ( a s+le case possible4 ,diff]5ces 9 ! prim>y sexual det]m9ants1 toge!r ) ! v>y+ int]nal secretions 7:i* diff] 9 quantity & quality 9 diff]5t individuals7 produce ! ph5om5a ( sexually int]m$iate =ms4 ,arrh5oplasm & !lyplasm1 9 _! c\ntless modifications1 are ! microscopic ag5cies :i*1 9 co-op]ation ) ! int]nal secretions1 give rise to ! macroscopic diff]5ces cit$ 9 ! la/ *apt]4 ,if ! correctness ( ! conclusions s f> /at$ may be assum$1 ! necessity is at once evid5t = a :ole s]ies ( anatomical1 physiological1 hi/ological & hi/o-*emical inve/igations into ^? diff]5ces betwe5 male & female types1 9 ! /ructure & function ( ! individual organs by :i* ! d[]s ( arrh5oplasm & !lyplasm express !mselves 9 ! tissues4 ,! k we possess at ! pres5t "t on ^! matt]s comes f ! /udy ( av]ages1 b av]ages fail to satisfy ! mod]n /ati/ician1 & _! sci5tific value is v small4 ,inve/igations into ! sex-diff]5ces 9 ! weight ( ! bra91 = in/ance1 h s f> prov$ v little1 probably because no c>e 0 tak5 to *oose typical conditions1 ! assignm5t ( sex be+ dep5d5t on baptismal c]tificates or on sup]ficial glances at ! outw>d appe>ance4 ,z if e 8,john0 or 8,m>y0 7 repres5tative ( _! sexes because !y _h be5 dubb$ 8male0 & 8female60 ,x w\ld h be5 well1 ev5 if exact physiological data 7 ?\ght unnecess>y1 at lea/ to make c]ta9 z to a few facts z to ! g5]al condition ( ! body1 :i* might s]ve z guides to ! male or female condition1 su* z1 = in/ance1 ! di/ance betwe5 ! great tro*ant]s1 ! iliac sp9es1 & s =?1 = a sexual h>mony 9 ! diff]5t p>ts ( ! body is c]ta9ly m common ?an great sexual div]g5ce4 ,?is s\rce ( error1 ! c>eless acceptance ( sexually int]m$iate =ms z repres5tative subjects = measurem5t1 has maim$ o!r inve/igations & s]i\sly ret>d$ ! atta9m5t ( g5u9e & useful results4 ,^?1 = in/ance1 :o wi% to speculate ab\t ! cause ( ! sup]fluity ( male bir?s h to reckon ) ?is s\rce ( error4 ,9 a special way ?is c>elessness w rev5ge itself on ^? :o are inve/igat+ ! ultimate causes t det]m9e sex4 ,until ! exact degree ( mal5ess or femal5ess ( all ! liv+ individuals ( ! gr\p on :i* he is work+ c be det]m9$1 ! inve/igator w h reason to di/ru/ bo? 8 me?ods & 8 hypo!ses4 ,if he classify sexually int]m$iate =ms1 = in/ance1 accord+ to _! ext]nal appe>ance1 z has be5 done hi!rto1 he w come across cases :i* full] inve/igation w\ld %[ to be on ! wrong side ( 8 results1 :il/ o!r in/ances1 app>5tly on ! wrong side1 w\ld "r !mselves4 ,)\t ! conception ( an ideal male & an ideal female1 he lacks a /&>d accord+ to :i* to e/imate 8 real cases1 & he gropes =w>d to a sup]ficial & d\btful conclusion4 ,maupas1 = in/ance1 :o made exp]im5ts on ! det]m9ation ( sex 9 ,hydat9a s5ta1 a ,rotif]1 f\nd t !re 0 always an exp]im5tal error ( f ?ree to five p] c5t4 ,at l[ temp]atures ! production ( females 0 expect$1 b always ab\t ! above proportion ( males appe>$2 s also at ! high] temp]atures a simil> proportion ( females appe>$4 ,x is probable t ?is error 0 due to sexually int]m$iate /ages1 arrh5oplasmic females at ! high temp]ature1 !lyplasmic males at ! l[ temp]ature4 ,:]e ! problem is m complicat$1 z 9 ! case ( cattle1 to say no?+ ( human be+s1 ! process ( inve/igation w yield /ill less h>moni\s results1 & ! correction ( ! int]pretation :i* w h to be made by all[+ = ! di/urbance due to ! exi/5ce ( sexually int]m$iate =ms w be mu* m difficult4 ,! /udy ( comp>ative pa?ology ( ! sexual types is z necess>y z _! morphology1 physiology & developm5t4 ,9 ?is region ( inquiry z else:]e1 /ati/ics w\ld yield c]ta9 results4 ,diseases manife/ly mu* m abundant 9 "o sex might be describ$ z peculi> to or idiopa?ic ( !lyplasm or arrh5oplasm4 ,myxdema1 = in/ance1 is idiopa?ic ( ! female1 hydrocele ( ! male4 ,b no /ati/ics1 h[ev] num]\s & accurate1 c be reg>d$ z avoid+ a s\rce ( !oretical error until x has be5 %[n f ! nature ( any p>ticul> affection dealt ) t x is 9 indissoluble1 functional relation ) mal5ess or femal5ess4 ,! !ory ( su* associat$ diseases mu/ supply a reason :y !y occur almo/ exclusively 9 ! "o sex1 t is to say1 9 ! phrase ( ?is treatise1 :y !y are !lyplasmic or arrh5oplasmic4 ,,*apt] ,,iii ,,! ,,laws ,,( ,,sexual ,,attraction ,,c>m53 8,l'am\r e/ un oiseau rebelle1 ,que nul ne peut apprivois]3 ,et c'e/ bi5 en va9 qu'on l'appelle ,s'il lui convi5t de refus]4 ,ri5 n'y fait2 m5ace ou prire3 ,l'un p>le1 l'autre se tait2 ,et c'e/ l'autre que je prfre2 ,il n'a ri5 dit1 mais il me plat4 99 99 99 99 99 ,l'am\r e/ enfant de ,bohme ,il n'a jamais connu de loi40 ,x has be5 recognis$ f "t immemorial t1 9 all =ms ( sexually diff]5tiat$ life1 !re exi/s an attraction betwe5 males & females1 betwe5 ! male & ! female1 ! object ( :i* is procreation4 ,b z ! male & ! female are m]ely ab/ract conceptions :i* nev] appe> 9 ! real _w1 we _c speak ( sexual attraction z a simple attempt ( ! mascul9e & ! fem99e to come toge!r4 ,! !ory :i* ,i am develop+ mu/ take into acc\nt all ! facts ( sexual relations if x is to be complete2 inde$1 if x is to be accept$ in/ead ( ! old] views1 x mu/ give a bett] int]pretation ( all ^! sexual ph5om5a4 ,my recognition ( ! fact t ,m & ,f 7mal5ess & femal5ess7 are di/ribut$ 9 ! liv+ _w 9 e possible proportion has l$ me to ! discov]y ( an unkn[n natural law1 ( a law n yet suspect$ by any philosoph]1 a law ( sexual attraction4 ,z obs]vations on human be+s fir/ l$ me to my results1 ,i %all beg9 ) ?is side ( ! subject4 ,e "o possesses a def9ite1 individual ta/e ( 8 own ) reg>d to ! o!r sex4 ,if we comp>e ! portrait ( ! wom5 :i* "s fam\s man has be5 kn[n to love1 we %all ne>ly always f9d t !y are all closely alike1 ! simil>ity be+ mo/ obvi\s 9 ! cont\r 7m precisely 9 ! 8figure07 or 9 ! face1 b on clos] exam9ation be+ f\nd to ext5d to ! m9ute/ details1 ad unguem1 to ! f+]-tips4 ,x is precisely ! same ) e "o else4 ,s1 also1 e girl :o /rongly attracts a man recalls to him ! o!r girls he has lov$ be=e4 ,we see ano!r side ( ! same ph5om5on :5 we recall h[ (t5 we h said ( "s acqua9tance or ano!r1 8,i c't imag9e h[ t type ( woman pleases him40 ,d>w91 9 ! 8,desc5t ( ,man10 collect$ _m in/ances ( ! exi/5ce ( ?is individuality ( ! sexual ta/e among/ animals1 & ,i %all be able to %[ t !re are analog\s ph5om5a ev5 among/ plants4 ,sexual attraction is ne>ly always1 z 9 ! case ( gravitation1 reciprocal4 ,:]e !re appe> to be exceptions to ?is rule1 !re is ne>ly always evid5ce ( ! pres5ce ( special influ5ces :i* h be5 capable ( prev5t+ ! direct action ( ! special ta/e1 :i* is almo/ always reciprocal1 or :i* h left an unsatisfi$ crav+1 if ! direct ta/e 7 n all[$ its play4 ,! common say+1 8,wait+ = ,mr4 ,"r10 or /atem5ts su* z t 8,s-&-s are q unsuitable = "o ano!r10 %[ ! exi/5ce ( an obscure pres5tim5t ( ! fact t e man or woman possesses c]ta9 individual peculi>ities :i* qualify or disqualify him or h] = m>riage ) any p>ticul> memb] ( ! opposite sex2 & t ?is man _c be sub/itut$ = t1 or ?is woman = ! o!r )\t creat+ a di%>mony4 ,x is a common p]sonal exp]i5ce t c]ta9 individuals ( ! opposite sex are di/a/eful to u1 t o!rs leave u cold2 :il/ o!rs aga9 may /imulate u until1 at la/1 "s "o appe>s :o seems s desirable t ev]y?+ 9 ! _w is wor?less & empty comp>$ ) union ) su* a "o4 ,:at are ! qualifications ( t p]son8 ,:at are 8 or h] peculi>ities8 ,if x really be ! case--& ,i ?9k x is--t e male type has its female c\nt]p>t ) reg>d to sexual aff9ity1 x looks z if !re 7 "s def9ite law4 ,:at is ?is law8 ,h[ does x act8 8,l poles repel1 unlike attract10 0 :at ,i 0 told :51 already arm$ ) my own answ]1 ,i resolutely importun$ diff]5t k9ds ( m5 = a /atem5t1 & submitt$ in/ances to _! p[] ( g5]alisation4 ,! =mula1 no d\bt1 is true 9 a limit$ s5se & = a c]ta9 numb] ( cases4 ,b x is at once too g5]al & too vague2 x w\ld be appli$ diff]5tly by diff]5t p]sons1 & x is incapable ( be+ /at$ 9 ma!matical t]ms4 ,?is book does n claim to /ate all ! laws ( sexual aff9ity1 = !re are _m2 nor does x pret5d to be able to tell e "o exactly :i* individual ( ! opposite sex w be/ suit 8 ta/e1 = t w\ld imply a complete k ( all ! laws 9 "q4 ,9 ?is *apt] only "o ( ^! laws w be consid]$--! law :i* /&s 9 organic relation to ! re/ ( ! book4 ,i am work+ at a numb] ( o!r laws1 b ! foll[+ is t to :i* ,i h giv5 mo/ inve/igation1 & :i* is mo/ elaborat$4 ,9 criticis+ ?is "w1 all[ance mu/ be made = ! incomplete nature ( ! mat]ial consequ5t on ! novelty & difficulty ( ! subject4 ,=tunately x is n necess>y = me to cite at l5g? ei!r ! facts f :i* ,i orig9ally d]iv$ ?is law ( sexual aff9ity or to set out 9 detail ! evid5ce ,i obta9$ f p]sonal /atem5ts4 ,i ask$ ea* ( ^? :o help$ me1 to make out 8 own case fir/1 & !n to c>ry out obs]vations 9 8 circle ( acqua9tances4 ,i h paid special att5tion to ^? cases :i* h be5 notic$ & rememb]$1 9 :i* ! ta/e ( a fri5d has n be5 und]/ood1 or appe>$ n to be pres5t1 or 0 diff]5t f t ( ! obs]v]4 ,! m9ute degree ( k ( ! ext]nal =m ( ! human body :i* is necess>y = ! inve/igation is possess$ by e "o4 ,i h come to ! law :i* ,i %all n[ =mulate by a me?od ! validity ( :i* ,i %all n[ h to prove4 ,! law runs z foll[s3 8,= true sexual union x is necess>y t !re come toge!r a complete male 7,m7 & a complete female 7,f71 ev5 al?\gh 9 diff]5t cases ! ,m & ,f are di/ribut$ betwe5 ! two individuals 9 diff]5t proportions40 ,! law may be express$ o!rwise z foll[s3 ,if we take 1 any individual reg>d$ 9 ! ord9>y way z a male1 & d5ote 8 real sexual con/itution z ,m1 s _m p>ts really male1 plus ,w1 s _m p>ts really female2 if we also take 1 any individual reg>d$ 9 ! ord9>y way z a female1 & d5ote h] real sexual con/itution z ,w1 s _m p>ts really female1 plus ,m1 s _m p>ts really male2 !n1 if !re be complete sexual aff9ity1 ! greate/ possible sexual attraction betwe5 ! two individuals1 & 1 7#a7 ,m 7! truly male "p 9 ! 8male07 ,m 7! truly male "p 9 ! 8female07 w equal a con/ant quantity1 ,m1 ! ideal male2 & 7#b7 ,w ,w 7! ideal female p>ts 9 respectively ! 8male0 & ! 8female07 w equal a second con/ant quantity1 ,w1 ! ideal female4 ,?is /atem5t mu/ n be misund]/ood4 ,bo? =mulas ref] to "o case1 to a s+le sexual relation1 ! second foll[+ directly f ! fir/ & add+ no?+ to x1 z ,i set out f ! po9t ( view ( an individual possess+ j z mu* femal5ess z he lacks ( mal5ess4 ,7 he completely male1 8 requisite complem5t w\ld be a complete female1 & vice v]s4 ,if1 h[ev]1 he is compos$ ( a def9ite inh]itance ( mal5ess1 & also an inh]itance ( femal5ess 7:i* mu/ n be neglect$71 !n1 to complete ! individual1 8 mal5ess mu/ be complet$ to make a unit2 b s also mu/ 8 femal5ess be complet$4 ,if1 = in/ance1 an individual be compos$ ?us3 ,m & ,w1 !n ! be/ sexual complem5t ( t individual w be ano!r comp\nd z foll[s3 ,m & ,w4 ,x c be se5 at once t ?is view is wid] 9 its rea* ?an ! common /atem5t ( ! case4 ,t male & female1 z sexual types1 attract ea* o!r is only "o in/ance ( my g5]al law1 an in/ance 9 :i* an imag9>y individual1 #a ,m #j ,w1 f9ds its complem5t 9 an equally imag9>y individual1 #j ,m #a ,w4 ,!re c be no hesitation 9 admitt+ ! exi/5ce ( def9ite1 individual sexual pref]5ces1 & su* an admission c>ries ) x approval ( ! necessity ( inve/igat+ ! laws ( ! pref]5ce1 & its relation to ! re/ ( ! bodily & m5tal *>act]s ( an individual4 ,! law1 z ,i h /at$ x1 c enc\nt] no initial s5se ( impossibility1 & is contr>y nei!r to sci5tific nor common exp]i5ce4 ,b x is n self-evid5t4 ,x might be t ! law1 :i* _c yet be reg>d$ z fully work$ out1 might run z foll[s3 ,m - ,m a con/ant2 t is to say1 x may be ! diff]5ce betwe5 ! degrees ( mascul9ity & n ! sum ( ! degrees ( mascul9ity t is a con/ant quality1 s t ! mo/ mascul9e man w\ld /& j z f> remov$ f 8 complem5t 7:o 9 ?is case w\ld lie ne>ly midway betwe5 mascul9ity & fem99ity7 z ! mo/ fem99e man w\ld be remov$ f 8 complem5t :o w\ld be ne> ! extreme ( fem99ity4 ,al?\gh1 z ,i h said1 ?is is conceivable1 x is n borne out by exp]i5ce4 ,recognis+ t we h to d "h ) an empirical law1 & try+ to obs]ve a wise sci5tific re/ra9t1 we %all d well to avoid speak+ z if !re 7 any 8=ce0 pull+ ! two individuals toge!r z if !y 7 puppets2 ! law is no m ?an ! /atem5t t an id5tical relation c be made out 9 ea* case ( maximum sexual attraction4 ,we are deal+1 9 fact1 ) :at ,o/wald t]m$ an 8inv>iant0 & ,av5>ius a 8multiponible02 & ?is is ! con/ant sum =m$ by ! total mascul9ity & ! total fem99ity 9 all cases :]e a pair ( liv+ be+s come toge!r ) ! maximum sexual attraction4 ,9 ?is matt] we may neglect altoge!r ! s-call$ /hetic factor1 ! /imulus ( beauty4 ,= does x n frequ5tly happ5 t "o man is completely captivat$ by a p>ticul> woman & raves ab\t h] beauty1 :il/ ano!r1 :o is n ! sexual complem5t ( ! woman 9 "q1 _c imag9e :at 8 fri5d sees 9 h] to admire4 ,)\t discuss+ ! laws ( /hetics or attempt+ to ga!r toge!r examples ( relative values1 x may readily be admitt$ t a man may consid] a woman beautiful :o1 f ! /hetic /&po9t1 is n m]ely indiff]5t b actually ugly1 t 9 fact pure /hetics deal n ) absolute beauty1 b m]ely ) conceptions ( beauty f :i* ! sexual factor has be5 elim9at$4 ,i h myself work$ out ! law 91 at ! l[e/1 _m hundr$ cases1 & ,i h f\nd t ! exceptions 7 only app>5t4 ,almo/ e c\ple "o meets 9 ! /reet furni%es a new pro(4 ,! exceptions 7 specially in/ructive1 z !y n only sugge/$ b l$ to ! inve/igation ( o!r laws ( sexuality4 ,i myself made special inve/igations 9 ! foll[+ way4 ,i obta9$ a set ( photographs ( /hetically beautiful wom5 ( blameless "*1 ea* ( :i* 0 a good example ( "s def9ite proportion ( fem99ity1 & ,i ask$ a numb] ( my fri5ds to inspect ^! & select ! mo/ beautiful4 ,! selection made 0 inv>iably t :i* ,i _h pr$ict$4 ,) o!r male fri5ds1 :o knew on :at ,i 0 engag$1 ,i set ab\t 9 ano!r fa%ion4 ,!y provid$ me ) photographs f among/ :i* ,i 0 to *oose ! "o ,i %\ld expect !m to ?9k mo/ beautiful4 ,"h1 too1 ,i 0 uni=mly successful4 ,) o!rs1 ,i 0 able to describe mo/ accurately _! ideal ( ! opposite sex1 indep5d5tly ( any sugge/ions unconsci\sly giv5 by !m1 (t5 9 m9ut] detail ?an !y _h realis$4 ,sometimes1 too1 ,i 0 able to po9t out to !m1 = ! fir/ "t1 ! qualities t repell$ !m 9 individuals ( ! opposite sex1 al?\gh = ! mo/ "p m5 realise m readily ! *>act]s t repel !m ?an ! *>act]s t attract !m4 ,i believe t ) a little practice any "o c\ld readily acquire & ex]cise ?is art on any circle ( fri5ds4 ,a k ( o!r laws ( sexual aff9ity w\ld be ( great importance4 ,a numb] ( special con/ants might be tak5 z te/s ( ! exi/5ce ( complem5t>y individuals4 ,= in/ance1 ! law might be c>icatur$ s z to require t ! sum ( ! l5g? ( ! hairs ( any two p]fect lov]s %\ld always be ! same4 ,b1 z ,i h already %[n 9 *apt] ii41 ?is result is n to be expect$1 because all ! organs ( ! same body d n necess>ily possess ! same degree ( mal5ess or femal5ess4 ,su* heuri/ic rules w\ld soon multiply & br+ ! :ole subject into ridicule1 & ,i %all !re=e ab/a9 f fur!r sugge/ions ( ! k9d4 ,i d n d5y t my exposition ( ! law is some:at dogmatical & lacks confirmation by exact detail4 ,b ,i am n s anxi\s to claim f9i%$ results z to incite o!rs to ! /udy1 ! m s z ! means = sci5tific inve/igations are lack+ 9 my own case4 ,b ev5 if mu* rema9s !oretical1 ,i hope t ,i %all h firmly rivet$ ! *ief beams 9 my edifice ( !ory by %[+ h[ x expla9s mu* t hi!rto has f\nd no explanation1 & s %all h1 9 a fa%ion1 prov$ x retrospectively by %[+ h[ mu* x w\ld expla9 if x 7 true4 ,a mo/ rem>kable confirmation ( my law may be f\nd 9 ! vegetable k+dom1 9 a gr\p ( facts hi!rto reg>d$ z isolat$ & to be s /range z to h no p>allel4 ,e botani/ mu/ h guess$ already t ,i h 9 m9d ! ph5om5a ( het]o/ylism1 fir/ discov]$ by ,p]soon1 !n describ$ by ,d>w9 & nam$ by ,hildebr&4 ,_m ,dicotyl$ons1 & a few ,monocotyl$ons1 = in/ance1 species ( ,primulace & ,g]aneace & _m ,rubiace1 phan]ogams 9 ! fl[]s ( :i* bo? ! poll5 & ! /igma are functional1 al?\gh only 9 cross-f]tilisation1 s t ! fl[]s are h]maphrodite 9 /ructure b unisexual physiologically1 display ! peculi>ity t 9 diff]5t individuals ! /am5s & ! /igma h diff]5t l5g?s4 ,! individuals1 all ! fl[]s ( :i* h long /yles & !re=e high /igmas & %ort an!rs1 are1 9 my judgm5t1 ! m female1 :il/ ! individuals ) %ort /yles & long an!rs are m male4 ,9 addition to su* dimorphic plants1 !re are also trimorphic plants1 su* z ,ly?rum salic>ia1 9 :i* ! sexual organs display ?ree =ms diff]+ 9 l5g?4 ,!re are n only long-/yl$ & %ort-/yl$ =ms1 b fl[]s ) /yles ( a m$ium l5g?4 ,al?\gh only dimorphism & trimorphism h be5 recognis$ 9 ! books1 ^! conditions d n exhau/ ! actual complexities ( /ructure4 ,d>w9 himself po9t$ out t if small diff]5ces 7 tak5 into acc\nt1 no less ?an five diff]5t situations ( ! an!rs c\ld be di/+ui%$4 ,alongside su* pla9 cases ( discont9uity1 ( ! sep>ation ( ! diff]5t degrees ( mal5ess & femal5ess 9 pla9ly di/9ct individuals1 !re are also cases 9 :i* ! diff]5t degrees grade into ea* o!r )\t breaks 9 ! s]ies4 ,!re are analog\s cases ( discont9uity 9 ! animal k+dom1 al?\gh !y h always be5 ?\ght ( z unique & isolat$ ph5om5a1 z ! p>allel ) het]o/ylism _h n be5 sugge/$4 ,9 sev]al g5]a ( insects1 z1 = in/ance1 "s ,e>wigs 7,=ficul7 & ,lamellicorn ,beetles 7,lucanus c]vus71 ! ,/ag-beetle 7,dyna/es ,h]cules71 & ,xylotrupes gideon1 !re are "s males 9 :i* ! ant5n1 ! second>y sexual *>act]s by :i* !y diff] mo/ m>k$ly f ! females1 are extremely long1 & o!rs 9 :i* !y are v %ort4 ,bateson1 :o has writt5 mo/ on ?is subject1 di/+ui%es ! two =ms z 8high males0 & 8l[ males40 ,x is true t a cont9u\s s]ies ( int]m$iate =ms l9ks ! extreme types1 b1 none ! less1 ! va/ majority ( ! individuals are at "o extreme or ! o!r4 ,un=tunately1 ,bateson did n inve/igate ! relations betwe5 ^! diff]5t types ( males & ! females1 & s x is n kn[n if !re be female types ) special sexual aff9ity = ^! male types4 ,?us ^! obs]vations c be tak5 only z a morphological p>allel to het]o/ylism & n z cases ( ! law ( complem5t>y sexual attraction4 ,het]o/yl\s plants may possibly be ! means ( e/abli%+ my view t ! law ( sexual complem5ts holds good = e k9d ( liv+ ?+4 ,d>w9 fir/1 & aft] him _m o!r inve/igators h prov$ t 9 het]o/yl\s plants f]tilisation has ! be/ results1 or1 inde$1 may be possible only :5 ! poll5 f a macro/yl\s fl[] 7a fl[] ) ! %orte/ =m ( an!rs & longe/ pi/il7 falls on ! /igma ( a micro/yl\s blossom 7"o :]e ! pi/il is ! %orte/ possible & ! /am5s at _! greate/ l5g?71 or vice v]s4 ,9 o!r words1 if ! be/ result is to be atta9$ by ! cross-f]tilisation ( a pair ( fl[]s1 "o fl[] ) a long pi/il1 & !re=e high degree ( femal5ess1 & %ort /am5s mu/ be mat$ ) ano!r possess+ a correspond+ly %ort pi/il1 & s1 ) ! am\nt ( femal5ess complem5t>y to ! fir/ fl[]1 & ) long /am5s complem5t>y to ! %ort /am5s ( ! fir/ fl[]4 ,9 ! case ( fl[]s :]e !re are ?ree pi/il l5g?s1 ! be/ results may be expect$ :5 ! poll5 ( "o blossom is transmitt$ to ano!r blossom 9 :i* ! /igma is ! ne>e/ complem5t ( ! /igma ( ! fl[] f :i* ! poll5 came2 if ano!r comb9ation is made1 ei!r naturally or by artificial f]tilisation1 !n1 if a result foll[s at all1 ! se$l+s are scanty1 dw>f$ & sometimes inf]tile1 mu* z :5 hybrids betwe5 species are =m$4 ,x is to be notic$ t ! au?ors :o h discuss$ het]o/ylism are n satisfi$ ) ! usual explanation1 :i* is t ! insects :i* visit ! fl[]s c>ry ! poll5 at diff]5t relative positions on _! bodies correspond+ to ! diff]5t l5g?s ( ! sexual organs & s produce ! wond]ful result4 ,d>w91 moreov]1 admits t bees c>ry all sorts ( poll5 on e "p ( _! bodies2 s t x has /ill to be made cle> h[ ! female organs du/$ ) two or ?ree k9ds ( poll5 make _! *oice ( ! mo/ suitable4 ,! supposition ( a p[] ( *oice1 h[ev] int]e/+ & wond]ful x is1 does n acc\nt = ! bad results :i* foll[ artificial du/+ ) ! wrong k9d ( poll5 7s-call$ 8illegitimate f]tilisation074 ,! !ory t ! /igmas c only make use (1 or are capable ( receiv+ only 8legitimate poll50 has be5 prov$ by ,d>w9 to be errone\s1 inasmu* z ! insects :i* act z f]tilis]s c]ta9ly sometimes />t v>i\s cross-bre$+s4 ,! hypo!sis t ! reason = ?is selective ret5tion on ! "p ( individuals is a special quality1 deep-seat$ 9 ! fl[]s !mselves1 seems m probable4 ,we h probably "h to d ) ! pres5ce1 j z 9 human be+s1 ( a maximum degree ( sexual attraction betwe5 individuals1 "o ( :i* possesses j z mu* femal5ess z ! o!r possesses mal5ess1 & ?is is m]ely ano!r mode ( /at+ my sexual law4 ,! probability ( ?is int]pretation is increas$ by ! fact t 9 ! %ort-/yl$1 long-an!r$1 m male fl[]s1 ! poll5 gra9s are l>g] & ! papill on ! /igmas are small] ?an ! correspond+ p>ts ( ! long-/yl$1 %ort-an!r$1 m female fl[]s4 ,"h we h c]ta9ly to d ) diff]5t degrees ( mal5ess & femal5ess4 ,^! circum/ances supply a /rong corroboration ( my law ( sexual aff9ity1 t 9 ! vegetable k+dom z well z 9 ! animal k+dom 7,i %all return lat] to ?is po9t7 f]tilisation has ! be/ results :5 x occurs betwe5 p>5ts ) maximum sexual aff9ity4#c #c ,= special purposes ! bre$]1 ^: object frequ5tly is to modify natural t5d5cies1 w (t5 disreg>d ?is law4 ,consid]ation ( sexual av]sion af=ds ! readie/ pro( t ! law holds good ?r\gh\t ! animal k+dom4 ,i %\ld l to sugge/ "h t x w\ld be extremely int]e/+ to make obs]vations z to :e!r ! l>g]1 heavi] & less active egg-cells ex]t a special attraction on ! small] & m active sp]matozoa1 :il/ ^? egg-cells ) less food-yolk attract m /rongly ! l>g] & less active sp]matozoa4 ,x may be ! case1 z ,l4 ,weill has already sugge/$ 9 a speculation z to ! factors t det]m9e sex1 t !re is a correlation betwe5 ! rates ( motion or k9etic en]gies ( conjugat+ sexual cells4 ,x has n yet be5 det]m9$1 al?\gh inde$ x w\ld be difficult to det]m9e1 if ! sexual cells1 ap>t f ! /reams & eddies ( _! fluid m$ium1 approa* ea* o!r ) equal velocities or sometimes display special activity4 ,!re is a wide field = inve/igation "h4 ,z ,i h repeat$ly rem>k$1 my law is n ! only law ( sexual aff9ity1 o!rwise1 no d\bt1 x w\ld h be5 discov]$ long ago4 ,j because s _m o!r actors are b\nd up ) x1#d because ano!r1 p]haps _m o!r laws sometimes ov]%ad[ x1 cases ( undi/urb$ action ( sexual aff9ity are r>e4 ,z ! necess>y inve/igations h n yet be5 f9i%$1 ,i w n speak at l5g? ( su* laws1 b r by way ( illu/ration ,i %all ref] to a few factors :i* z yet _c be demon/rat$ ma!matically4 #d ,9 speak+ ( ! sexual ta/e 9 m5 & wom51 "o ?9ks at once ( ! usual b n inv>iable pref]5ce individuals %[ = a p>ticul> col\r ( hair4 ,x w\ld c]ta9ly seem z if ! reason = s /rongly m>k$ a pref]5ce mu/ lie deep 9 human nature4 ,i %all beg9 ) "s ph5om5a :i* are pretty g5]ally recognis$4 ,m5 :5 q "y1 say "u tw5ty1 are attract$ by mu* old] wom5 7say ^? ( ?irty-five & s on71 :il/ m5 ( ?irty-five are attract$ by wom5 mu* y\ng] ?an !mselves4 ,s also1 on ! o!r h&1 q "y girls 7sweet sev5te57 g5]ally pref] mu* old] m51 b1 lat] 9 life1 may m>ry /ripl+s4 ,! :ole subject des]ves close att5tion & is bo? popul> & easily notic$4 ,9 spite ( ! necess>y limitation ( ?is "w to ! consid]ation ( a s+le law1 x w make = exactness if ,i try to /ate ! =mula 9 a m def9ite fa%ion1 )\t ! deceptive elem5t ( simplicity4 ,ev5 )\t be+ able to /ate 9 def9ite quantities ! o!r factors & ! co-op]at+ laws1 we may rea* a satisfactory exactness by ! use ( a v>iable factor4 ,! fir/ =mula 0 only an ab/ract g5]al /atem5t ( :at is common to all cases ( maximum sexual attraction s f> z ! sexual relation is gov]n$ by ! law4 ,i mu/ n[ try to f9d an expression = ! /r5g? ( ! sexual aff9ity 9 any conceivable case1 an expression :i* on acc\nt ( its g5]al =m1 c be us$ to describe ! relation%ip betwe5 any two liv+ be+s1 ev5 if ^! belong to diff]5t species or to ! same sex4 ,if ,m ,w & ,w ,m 7:]e 1 1 1 & are ea* great] ?an #j & less ?an unity7 def9e ! sexual con/itutions ( any two liv+ be+s betwe5 :i* !re is an attraction1 !n ! /r5g? ( ! attraction may be express$ ?us3 ,k ,a -----ft - :]e ft is an empirical or analytical function ( ! p]iod dur+ :i* x is possible = ! individuals to act ^u "o ano!r1 :at may be call$ ! 8reaction-"t02 :il/ ,k is ! v>iable factor 9 :i* we place all ! kn[n & unkn[n laws ( sexual aff9ity1 & :i* also v>ies ) ! degree ( specific1 racial & family relation%ip1 & ) ! heal? & abs5ce ( de=mity 9 ! two individuals1 & :i*1 f9ally1 w become small] z ! actual spacial di/ance betwe5 ! two is great]1 & :i* c be det]m9$ 9 any individual case4 ,:5 9 ?is =mula ,a mu/ be inf9ity2 ?is is ! extreme case2 x is sexual attraction z an elem5tal =ce1 z x has be5 describ$ ) a weird ma/]craft by ,lynkeus 9 ! novel 8,im ,po/wag540 ,su* sexual attraction is z mu* a natural law z ! d[nw>d gr[? ( a rootlet t[>ds ! e>?1 or ! migration ( bact]ia to ! oxyg5 at ! edge ( a microscopic cov]-glass4 ,b x takes "s "t to gr[ accu/om$ to su* a view4 ,i %all ref] to ?is po9t aga94 ,if - has its maximum value1 :i* is :5 x equals unity1 !n ,a ,k4 ft4 ,?is w\ld be ! extreme case ( ! action ( all ! sympa!tic & antipa!tic relations betwe5 human be+s 7leav+ out ( acc\nt social relations 9 _! n>r[e/ s5se1 :i* are m]ely ! safegu>ds ( communities7 :i* are n includ$ 9 ! law ( sexual aff9ity4 ,z ,k g5]ally increases ) ! /r5g? ( cong5ital relation%ip1 ,a has a great] value :5 ! individuals are ( ! same nationality ?an :5 !y belong to diff]5t nationalities4 ,! value ( ft is great 9 ?is case1 & "o c inve/igate its fluctuations1 z1 = in/ance1 :5 two dome/ic animals ( diff]5t species are 9 association2 at fir/ x usually /&s = viol5t enmity1 or fe> ( ea* o!r 7& ,a has a negative value71 :il/ lat] on a fri5d%ip may come ab\t4 ,:5 ,k #j 9 ! =mula ,k 4 ft ,a ---------1 - !n ,a #j1 :i* means t betwe5 two liv+ be+s ( orig9 too remote !re may be no trace ( sexual attraction4 ,! provisions ( ! crim9al /atute-books1 h[ev]1 9 ref]5ce to sodomy & be/iality %[ pla9ly t ev5 9 ! case ( v remote species ,k has a value great] ?an no?+4 ,! =mula may apply to two individuals n only n ( ! same species1 b ev5 n ( ! same ord]4 ,x is a new !ory t ! union ( male & female organisms is no m]e matt] ( *ance1 b is guid$ by a def9ite law2 & ! actual complexities :i* ,i h m]ely sugge/$ %[ ! ne$ = complete inve/igation into ! my/]i\s nature ( sexual attraction4 ,! exp]im5ts ( ,wilhelm ,pfeff] h %[n t ! male cells ( _m cryptogams are naturally attract$ n m]ely by ! female cells1 b also by sub/ances :i* !y h come 9 contact ) "u natural conditions1 or :i* h be5 introduc$ to !m exp]im5tally1 9 ! latt] case ! sub/ances be+ sometimes ( a k9d ) :i* !y c\ld n possibly h come 9 contact1 except "u ! conditions ( exp]im5t4 ,?us ! male cells ( f]ns are attract$ n only by ! malic acid secret$ naturally by ! ar*egonia1 b by syn!tically prep>$ malic acid1 :il/ ! male cells ( mosses are attract$ ei!r by ! natural acid ( ! female cells or by acid prep>$ f cane sug>4 ,a male cell1 :i*1 we "k n h[1 is influ5c$ by ! degree ( conc5tration ( a solution1 moves t[>ds ! mo/ conc5trat$ "p ( ! fluid4 ,pfeff] nam$ su* movem5ts 8*emotactic0 & co9$ ! ^w 8*emotropism0 to include ^! & _m o!r asexual cases ( motion /imulat$ by *emical bodies4 ,!re is mu* to support ! view t ! attraction ex]cis$ by females on males :i* p]ceive !m at a di/ance by s5se organs is to be reg>d$ z analog\s 9 c]ta9 respects ) *emotropism4 ,x seems highly probable t *emotropism is also ! explanation ( ! re/less & p]si/5t en]gy ) :i* = days toge!r ! mammalian sp]matozoa seek ! entrance to ! ut]us1 al?\gh ! natural curr5t produc$ f ! muc\s membrane ( ! ut]us is f )9 outw>ds4 ,! sp]matozoon1 9 spite ( all me*anical & o!r h9drances1 makes = ! egg-cell ) an almo/ incr$ible c]ta9ty4 ,9 ?is connection we may call to m9d ! prodigi\s j\rneys made by _m fi%2 salmon travel = mon?s toge!r1 practically )\t tak+ any food1 f ! op5 sea to ! s\rces ( ! ,rh9e1 aga9/ ! curr5t ( ! riv]1 9 ord] to spawn 9 localities t are safe & well provid$ ) food4 ,i h rec5tly be5 look+ at ! beautiful sket*es :i* ,p4 ,falk5b]g has made ( ! processes ( f]tilisation 9 "s ( ! ,m$it]ranean seawe$s4 ,:5 we speak ( ! l9es ( =ce betwe5 ! opposite poles ( magnets we are deal+ ) a =ce no m natural ?an t :i* irresi/ibly attracts ! sp]matozoon & ! egg-cell4 ,! *ief diff]5ce seems to be t 9 ! case ( ! attraction betwe5 ! inorganic sub/ances1 /ra9s are set up 9 ! m$ia betwe5 ! two poles1 :il/ 9 ! liv+ matt] ! =ces seem conf9$ to ! organisms !mselves4 ,accord+ to ,falk5b]g's obs]vations1 ! sp]matozoa1 9 mov+ t[>ds ! egg-cells1 are able to ov]come ! =ce :i* o!rwise w\ld be ex]cis$ ^u !m by a s\rce ( light4 ,! sexual attraction1 ! *emotactic =ce1 is /rong] ?an ! phototactic =ce4 ,:5 a union has tak5 place betwe5 two individuals :o1 accord+ to my =mula1 are n adapt$ to ea* o!r1 if lat]1 ! natural complem5t ( ei!r appe>s ! incl9ation to des]t ! make%ift at once ass]ts itself 9 accordance ) an inevitable law ( nature4 ,a divorce takes place1 z mu* con/itutional1 dep5d+ on ! nature ( ?+s1 z :51 if iron sulphate & cau/ic pota% are br\ght toge!r1 ! ,,s ions leave ! iron to unite ) ! potassium4 ,:5 9 nature an adju/m5t ( su* diff]5ces ( pot5tial is ab\t to take place1 he :o w\ld approve or disapprove ( ! process f ! moral po9t ( view w\ld appe> to mo/ to play a ridicul\s "p4 ,?is is ! fundam5tal idea 9 ,goe!'s 8,wahlv]w&ts*aft50 7,elective ,aff9ities71 & 9 ! f\r? *apt] ( ! fir/ "p ( t "w he makes x ! subject ( a playful introduction :i* 0 full ( undream$ ( future significance1 & ! full =ce ( :i* he 0 fat$ himself to exp]i5ce 9 lat] life4 ,i mu/ confess to be+ pr\d t ?is book is ! fir/ "w to take up 8 ideas4 ,none ! less1 x is z little my int5tion z x 0 ! int5tion ( ,goe! to advocate divorce2 ,i hope only to expla9 x4 ,!re are human motives :i* indispose man to divorce & enable him to )/& x4 ,?is ,i %all discuss lat] on4 ,! physical side ( sex 9 man is less completely rul$ by natural law ?an is ! case ) l[] animals4 ,we get an indication ( ?is 9 ! fact t man is sexual ?r\gh\t ! ye>1 & t 9 him !re is less trace ?an ev5 9 dome/ic animals ( ! exi/5ce ( a special spr+ bre$+-season4 ,! law ( sexual aff9ity is analog\s 9 ano!r respect to a well-kn[n law ( !oretical *emi/ry1 al?\gh1 inde$1 !re are m>k$ diff]5ces4 ,! viol5ce ( a *emical reaction is proportionate to ! mass ( ! sub/ances involv$1 z1 = in/ance1 a /rong] acid solution unites ) a /rong] basic solution ) great] avidity1 j z 9 ! case ( ! union ( a pair ( liv+ be+s ) /rong mal5ess & femal5ess4 ,b !re is an ess5tial diff]5ce betwe5 ! liv+ process & ! reaction ( ! lifeless *emical sub/ances4 ,! liv+ organism is n homog5e\s & isotropic 9 its composition2 x is n divisible into a numb] ( small p>ts ( id5tical prop]ties4 ,! diff]5ce dep5ds on ! pr9ciple ( individuality1 on ! fact t e liv+ ?+ is an individual1 & t its individuality is ess5tially /ructural4 ,& s 9 ! vital process x is n z 9 inorganic *emi/ry2 !re is no possibility ( a l>g] proportion =m+ "o comp\nd1 a small] proportion =m+ ano!r4 ,! organic *emotropism1 moreov]1 may be negative4 ,9 c]ta9 cases ! value ( ,a may result 9 a negative quantity1 t is to say1 ! sexual attraction may appe> 9 ! =m ( sexual repulsion4 ,x is true t 9 purely *emical processes ! same reaction may take place at diff]5t rates4 ,tak+1 h[ev]1 ! total failure ( "s reaction by catalytic int]f]5ce z ! equival5t ( a sexual repulsion1 x nev] happ5s1 accord+ to ! late/ inve/igations at lea/1 t ! int]f]5ce m]ely induces ! reaction aft] a long] or %ort] int]val4 ,on ! o!r h&1 x happ5s frequ5tly t a comp\nd :i* is =m$ at "o temp]ature breaks up at ano!r temp]ature4 ,"h ! 8direction0 ( ! reaction is a function ( ! temp]ature1 z1 9 ! vital process1 x may be a function ( "t4 ,9 ! value ( ! factor 8t10 ! "t ( reaction1 a f9al analogy ( sexual attraction ) *emical processes may be f\nd1 if we are will+ to trace ! comp>ison )\t lay+ too mu* /ress ^u x4 ,consid] ! =mula = ! rapidity ( ! reaction1 ! diff]5t degrees ( rapidity ) :i* a sexual attraction betwe5 two individuals is e/abli%$1 & reflect h[ ! value ( 8,a0 v>ies ) ! value ( 8t40 ,h[ev]1 :at ,kant t]m$ ma!matical vanity mu/ n tempt u to read into our equations complicat$ & difficult processes1 ! validity ( :i* is unc]ta94 ,all t c be impli$ is simple en\gh2 s5sual desire increases ) ! "t dur+ :i* two individuals are 9 prop9quity2 if !y 7 %ut up toge!r1 x w\ld develop if !re 7 no repulsion1 or practically no repulsion betwe5 !m1 9 ! fa%ion ( "s sl[ *emical process :i* takes mu* "t be=e its result is visible4 ,su* a case is ! confid5ce ) :i* x is said ( a m>riage arrang$ )\t love1 8,love w come lat]2 "t w br+ x40 ,x is pla9 t too mu* /ress mu/ n be laid on ! analogy betwe5 sexual aff9ity & purely *emical processes4 ,none ! less1 ,i ?\ght x illum9at+ to make ! comp>ison4 ,x is n yet q cle> if ! sexual attraction is to be rank$ ) ! 8tropisms10 & ! matt] _c be settl$ )\t go+ beyond m]e sexuality to discuss ! g5]al problem ( erotics4 ,! ph5om5a ( love require a diff]5t treatm5t1 & ,i %all return to !m 9 ! second "p ( ?is book4 ,none ! less1 !re are analogies t _c be d5i$ :5 human attractions & *emotropism are comp>$4 ,i may ref] z an in/ance to ! relation betwe5 ,edw>d & ,ottilie 9 ,goe!'s 8,wahlv]w&ts*aft540 ,m5tion ( ,goe!'s romance leads naturally to a discussion ( ! m>riage problem1 & ,i may "h give a few ( ! practical inf]5ces :i* w\ld seem to foll[ f ! !oretical consid]ations ( ?is *apt]4 ,x is cle> t a natural law1 n dissimil> to o!r natural laws1 exi/s ) reg>d to sexual attraction2 ?is law %[s t1 :il/ innum]able gradations ( sexuality exi/1 !re always may be f\nd pairs ( be+s ! memb]s ( :i* are almo/ p]fectly adapt$ to "o ano!r4 ,s f>1 m>riage has its ju/ification1 &1 f ! /&po9t ( biology1 free love is condemn$4 ,monogamy1 h[ev]1 is a m difficult problem1 ! solution ( :i* involves o!r consid]ations1 su* z p]iodicity1 to :i* ,i %all ref] lat]1 & ! *ange ( ! sexual ta/e ) advanc+ ye>s4 ,a second conclusion may be d]iv$ f het]o/ylism1 especially ) ref]5ce to ! fact t 8illegitimate f]tilisation0 almo/ inv>iably produces less f]tile (fspr+4 ,?is leads to ! consid]ation t among/ o!r =ms ( life ! /ronge/ & heal?ie/ (fspr+ w result f unions 9 :i* !re is ! maximum ( sexual suitability4 ,z ! old say+ has x1 8love-*ildr50 turn out to be ! f9e/1 /ronge/1 & mo/ vigor\s ( human be+s4 ,^? :o are int]e/$ 9 ! improvem5t ( mank9d mu/ !re=e1 on purely hygi5ic gr\nds1 oppose ! ord9>y m]c5>y m>riages ( conv5i5ce4 ,x is m ?an probable t ! law ( sexual attraction may yield useful results :5 appli$ to ! bre$+ ( animals4 ,m att5tion w h to be giv5 to ! second>y sexual *>act]s ( ! animals :i* x is propos$ to mate4 ,! artificial me?ods made use ( to secure ! s]v+ ( m>es by /allions unattractive to !m d n always fail1 b are foll[$ by indiff]5t results4 ,probably an obvi\s result ( ! use ( a sub/itut$ /allion 9 impregnat+ a m>e is ! extreme n]v\sness ( ! prog5y1 :i* mu/ be treat$ ) bromide & o!r drugs4 ,s1 also1 ! deg5]ation ( mod]n ,jews may be trac$ 9 "p to ! fact t among/ !m m>riages = o!r reasons ?an love are specially common4 ,among/ ! _m fundam5tal pr9ciples e/abli%$ by ! c>eful obs]vations & exp]im5ts ( ,d>w91 & s9ce confirm$ by o!r inve/igators1 is ! fact t bo? v closely relat$ individuals1 & ^? ^: specific *>act]s are too unlike1 h little sexual attraction = ea* o!r1 & t if 9 spite ( ?is sexual union occurs1 ! (fspr+ usually die at an e>ly /age or are v feeble1 or are practically inf]tile4 ,s also1 9 het]o/yl\s plants 8legitimate f]tilisation0 br+s ab\t m num]\s & vigor\s se$s ?an come f o!r unions4 ,x may be said 9 g5]al t ! (fspr+ ( ^? p>5ts :i* %[$ ! greate/ sexual attraction succe$ be/4 ,?is rule1 :i* is c]ta9ly univ]sal1 implies ! correctness ( a conclusion :i* might be drawn f ! e>li] "p ( ?is book4 ,:5 a m>riage has tak5 place & *ildr5 h be5 produc$1 ^! h ga9$ no?+ f ! conque/ ( sexual repulsion by ! p>5ts1 = su* a conque/ c\ld n take place )\t damage to ! m5tal & bodily *>act]s ( ! *ildr5 t w\ld come ( x4 ,x is c]ta91 h[ev]1 t _m *ildless m>riages h be5 loveless m>riages4 ,! old idea t ! *ance ( conception is increas$ :]e !re is a mutual p>ticipation 9 ! sexual act is closely connect$ ) :at we h be5 consid]+ z to ! great] int5sity ( ! sexual attraction betwe5 two complem5t>y individuals4 ,,*apt] ,,iv ,,homo-,,sexuality ,,& ,,p$]a/y ,! law ( ,sexual ,attraction gives ! long-s\ght-= explanation ( sexual inv]sion1 ( sexual incl9ation t[>ds memb]s ( ! same sex1 :e!r or no t be accompani$ by av]sion f memb]s ( ! opposite sex4 ,)\t ref]5ce to a di/9ction :i* ,i %all deal ) lat] on1 ,i may say at once t x is exce$+ly probable t1 9 all cases ( sexual inv]sion1 !re w be f\nd indications ( ! anatomical *>act]s ( ! o!r sex4 ,!re is no su* ?+ z a g5u9e 8psy*o-sexual h]maphroditism02 ! m5 :o are sexually attract$ by m5 h outw>d m>ks ( effem9acy1 j z wom5 ( a simil> disposition to ^? ( _! own sex exhibit male *>act]s4 ,t ?is %\ld be s is q intelligible if we admit ! close p>allelism betwe5 body & m9d1 & fur!r light is ?r[n ^u x by ! facts expla9$ 9 ! second *apt] ( ?is book2 ! facts z to ! male or female pr9ciple n be+ uni=mly pres5t all ov] ! same body1 b di/ribut$ 9 diff]5t am\nts 9 diff]5t organs4 ,9 all cases ( sexual inv]sion1 !re is inv>iably an anatomical approximation to ! opposite sex4 ,su* a view is directly oppos$ to t ( ^? :o w\ld ma9ta9 t sexual inv]sion is an acquir$ "*1 & "o t has sup]s$$ normal sexual impulses4 ,s*r5k-,notz+1 ,kraepel91 & ,fr are among/ ^? writ]s :o h urg$ ! view t sexual inv]sion is an acquir$ habit1 ! result ( ab/95ce f normal int]c\rse & p>ticul>ly induc$ by example4 ,b :at ab\t ! fir/ (f5d]8 ,did ! god ,h]maphroditos tea* him8 ,x might equally be s\ght to prove t ! sexual incl9ation ( a normal man = a normal woman 0 an unnatural1 acquir$ habit--a habit1 z "s anci5t writ]s h sugge/$1 t arose f "s accid5tal discov]y ( its agreeable nature4 ,j z a normal man discov]s = himself :at a woman is1 s also1 9 ! case ( a sexual 8inv]t0 ! attraction ex]cis$ on him by a p]son ( 8 own sex is a normal product ( 8 developm5t f 8 bir?4 ,naturally ! opportunity mu/ come 9 :i* ! individual may put 9 practice 8 desire = inv]t$ sexuality1 b ! opportunity w be tak5 only :5 8 natural con/itution has made ! individual ready = x4 ,t sexual ab/95ce 7to take ! second suppos$ cause ( inv]sion7 %\ld result 9 any?+ m ?an ma/urbation may be expla9$ by ! supposition t inv]sion is acquir$1 b t x %\ld be covet$ & eag]ly s\ght c only happ5 :5 ! dem& = x is root$ 9 ! con/itution4 ,9 ! same fa%ion normal sexual attraction might be said to be an acquir$ "*1 if x c\ld be prov$ def9itely t1 to fall 9 love1 a normal man mu/ fir/ see a woman or a picture ( a woman4 ,^? :o ass]t t sexual inv]sion is an acquir$ "*1 are mak+ a m]ely incid5tal or accessory factor responsible = ! :ole con/itution ( an organism4 ,!re is little reason = say+ t sexual inv]sion is acquir$1 & !re is j z little = reg>d+ x z inh]it$ f p>5ts or gr&p>5ts4 ,su* an ass]tion1 x is true1 has n be5 made1 & seems contr>y to all exp]i5ce2 b x has be5 sugge/$ t x is due to a neuropa?ic dia!sis1 & t g5]al con/itutional weakness is to be f\nd 9 ! desc5dants ( ^? :o h display$ sexual inv]sion4 ,9 fact sexual inv]sion has usually be5 reg>d$ z psy*o-pa?ological1 z a symptom ( deg5]ation1 & ^? :o exhibit x h be5 consid]$ z physically unfit4 ,?is view1 h[ev]1 is fall+ into disrepute1 especially z ,krafft-,eb+1 its pr9cipal *ampion1 ab&on$ x 9 ! lat] editions ( 8 "w4 ,none ! less1 x is n g5]ally recognis$ t sexual inv]ts may be o!rwise p]fectly heal?y1 & ) reg>d to o!r social matt]s q normal4 ,:5 !y h be5 ask$ if !y w\ld h wi%$ matt]s to be diff]5t ) !m 9 ?is respect1 almo/ inv>iably !y answ] 9 ! negative4 ,x is due to ! errone\s conceptions t ,i h m5tion$ t homo-sexuality has n be5 consid]$ 9 relation ) o!r facts4 ,let ^? :o reg>d sexual inv]sion z pa?ological1 z a hide\s anomaly ( m5tal developm5t 7! view accept$ by ! populace71 or believe x to be an acquir$ vice1 ! result ( an execrable s$uction1 rememb] t !re exi/ all transitional /ages rea*+ f ! mo/ mascul9e male to ! mo/ effem9ate male & s on to ! sexual inv]t1 ! false & true h]maphrodite2 & !n1 on ! o!r side1 successively ?r\gh ! sapphi/ to ! virago & s on until ! mo/ fem99e virg9 is rea*$4 ,9 ! int]pretation ( ?is volume1 sexual inv]ts ( bo? sexes are to be def9$ z individuals 9 :om ! factor 7see page #h1 *ap4 i47 is v ne>ly #j4e & s is practically equal to 2 9 o!r words1 individuals 9 :om !re is z mu* mal5ess z femal5ess1 or inde$ :o1 al?\gh reckon$ z m51 may conta9 an excess ( femal5ess1 or z wom5 & yet be m male ?an female4 ,because ( ! want ( uni=mity 9 ! sexual *>act]s ( ! body1 x is fairly c]ta9 t _m individuals h _! sex assign$ !m on acc\nt ( ! exi/5ce ( ! prim>y male sexual *>act]i/ic1 ev5 al?\gh !re may be delay$ desc5sus te/iculorum1 or epi- or hypo-spadism1 or1 lat] on1 abs5ce ( active sp]matozoa1 or ev51 9 ! case ( assignm5t ( ! female sex1 abs5ce ( ! vag9a1 & ?us male avocations 7su* z compulsory milit>y s]vice7 may come to be assign$ to ^? 9 :om is less ?an #j4e & great] ?an #j4e4 ,! sexual complem5t ( su* individuals really is to be f\nd on _! own side ( ! sexual l9e1 t is to say1 on ! side on :i* !y are reckon$1 al?\gh 9 reality !y may belong to ! o!r4 ,moreov]1 & ?is n only supports my view b c be expla9$ only by x1 !re are no inv]ts :o are completely sexually inv]t$4 ,9 all ( !m !re is f ! beg9n+ an incl9ation to bo? sexes2 !y are1 9 fact1 bisexual4 ,x may be t lat] on !y may actively enc\rage a slight lean+ t[>ds "o sex or ! o!r1 & s become practically unisexual ei!r 9 ! normal or 9 ! inv]t$ s5se1 or surr\nd+ influ5ce may br+ ab\t ?is result = !m4 ,b 9 su* processes ! fundam5tal bisexuality is nev] oblit]at$ & may at any "t give evid5ce ( its suppress$ pres5ce4 ,ref]5ce has (t5 be5 made1 & 9 rec5t ye>s has increas+ly be5 made1 to ! relation betwe5 homo-sexuality & ! pres5ce ( bisexual rudim5ts 9 ! embryonic /ages ( animals & plants4 ,:at is new 9 my view is t accord+ to x1 homo-sexuality _c be reg>d$ z an atavism or z due to arre/$ embryonic developm5t1 or incomplete diff]5tiation ( sex2 x _c be reg>d$ z an anomaly ( r>e occurr5ce int]polat+ itself 9 cu/om>y complete sep>ation ( ! sexes4 ,homo-sexuality is m]ely ! sexual condition ( ^! int]m$iate sexual =ms t /ret* f "o ideally sexual condition to ! o!r sexual condition4 ,9 my view all actual organisms h bo? homo-sexuality & het]o-sexuality4 ,t ! rudim5t ( homo-sexuality1 9 h[ev] weak a =m1 exi/s 9 e human be+1 correspond+ to ! great] or small] developm5t ( ! *>act]s ( ! opposite sex1 is prov$ conclusively f ! fact t 9 ! adolesc5t /age1 :ile !re is /ill a consid]able am\nt ( undiff]5tiat$ sexuality1 & be=e ! int]nal secretions h ex]t$ _! /imulat+ =ce1 passionate atta*m5ts ) a s5sual side are ! rule among/ boys z well z among/ girls4 ,a p]son :o reta9s f t age onw>ds a m>k$ t5d5cy to 8fri5d%ip0 ) a p]son ( 8 own sex mu/ h a /rong ta9t ( ! o!r sex 9 him4 ,^?1 h[ev]1 are /ill m obvi\sly int]m$iate sexual =ms1 :o1 aft] association ) bo? sexes1 fail to h ar\s$ 9 !m ! normal passion = ! opposite sex1 b /ill endeav\r to ma9ta9 confid5tial1 devot$ affection ) ^? ( _! own sex4 ,!re is no fri5d%ip betwe5 m5 t has n an elem5t ( sexuality 9 x1 h[ev] little acc5tuat$ x may be 9 ! nature ( ! fri5d%ip1 & h[ev] pa9ful ! idea ( ! sexual elem5t w\ld be4 ,b x is en\gh to rememb] t !re c be no fri5d%ip unless !re has be5 "s attraction to draw ! m5 toge!r4 ,mu* ( ! affection1 protection1 & nepotism betwe5 m5 is due to ! pres5ce ( unsuspect$ sexual compatibility4 ,an analogy ) ! sexual fri5d%ip ( y\? may be trac$ 9 ! case ( old m51 :51 = in/ance1 ) ! involution foll[+ old age1 ! lat5t amphisexuality ( man appe>s4 ,?is may be ! reason :y s _m m5 ( fifty ye>s & upw>ds are guilty ( indec5cy4 ,homo-sexuality has be5 obs]v$ among/ animals to a consid]able ext5t4 ,f4 ,k>s* has made a wide1 if n complete1 compilation f o!r au?ors4 ,un=tunately1 practically no obs]vations 7 made z to ! grades ( mal5ess or femal5ess to be obs]v$ 9 su* cases4 ,b we may be reasonably c]ta9 t ! law holds good 9 ! animal _w4 ,if bulls are kept ap>t f c[s = a consid]able "t1 homo-sexual acts occur among/ !m2 ! mo/ female are ! fir/ to become corrupt$1 ! o!rs lat]1 "s p]haps nev]4 7,x is among/ cattle t ! greate/ numb] ( sexually int]m$iate =ms h be5 record$47 ,?is %[s t ! t5d5cy 0 lat5t 9 !m1 b t at o!r times ! sexual dem& 0 satisfi$ 9 normal fa%ion4 ,cattle 9 captivity behave precisely z prison]s & convicts 9 ^! matt]s4 ,animals exhibit n m]ely onanism 7:i* is kn[n to !m z to human be+s71 b also homo-sexuality2 & ?is fact1 toge!r ) ! fact t sexually int]m$iate =ms are kn[n to occur among/ !m1 ,i reg>d z /rong evid5ce = my law ( sexual attraction4 ,inv]t$ sexual attraction1 !n1 is no exception to my law ( sexual attraction1 b is m]ely a special case ( x4 ,an individual :o is half-man1 half-woman1 requires z sexual complem5t a be+ simil>ly equipp$ ) a %>e ( bo? sexes 9 ord] to fulfil ! requirem5ts ( ! law4 ,?is expla9s ! fact t sexual inv]ts usually associate only ) p]sons ( simil> "*1 & r>ely admit to intimacy ^? :o are normal4 ,! sexual attraction is mutual1 & ?is expla9s :y sexual inv]ts s readily recognise ea* o!r4 ,?is be+ s1 ! normal elem5t 9 human society has v little idea ( ! ext5t to :i* homo-sexuality is practis$1 & :5 a case becomes public prop]ty1 e normal "y pr(ligate ?9ks t he has a "r to condemn su* 8atrocities40 ,s rec5tly z ! ye> #aijj a pr(essor ( psy*iatry 9 a ,g]man univ]sity urg$ t ^? :o practis$ homo-sexuality %\ld be ca/rat$4 ,! !rapeutical rem$ies :i* h be5 us$ to combat homo-sexuality1 9 cases :]e su* treatm5t has be5 attempt$1 are c]ta9ly less radical ?an ! advice ( ! pr(essor2 b !y s]ve to %[ only h[ little ! nature ( homo-sexuality 0 und]/ood4 ,! me?od us$ at pres5t is hypnotism1 & ?is c re/ only on ! !ory t homo-sexuality is an acquir$ "*4 ,by sugge/+ ! idea ( ! female =m & ( normal congress1 x is s\ght to accu/om ^? "u treatm5t to normal relations4 ,b ! ackn[l$g$ results are v few4 ,! failure is to be expect$ f our /&po9t4 ,! hypnotis] sugge/s to ! subject ! image ( a 8typical0 woman1 ignorant ( ! innate diff]5ces 9 ! subject & unaw>e t su* a type is naturally repulsive to him4 ,& z ! normal typical woman is n 8 complem5t1 x is fruitless ( ! doctor to advise ! s]vices ( any casual ,v5us1 h[ev] attractive1 to complete ! cure ( a man :o has long %unn$ normal int]c\rse4 ,if our =mula 7 us$ to discov] ! complem5t ( ! male inv]t1 x w\ld po9t to ! mo/ man-l woman1 ! ,lesbian or ,sapphi/ type4 ,probably su* is ! only type ( woman :o w\ld attract ! sexual inv]t or please him4 ,if a cure = sexual inv]sion mu/ be s\ght because x _c be left to its own ext9ction1 !n ?is !ory (f]s ! foll[+ solution4 ,sexual inv]ts mu/ be br\ght to sexual inv]ts1 f homo-sexuali/s to ,sapphi/s1 ea* 9 _! grades4 ,k ( su* a solution %\ld lead to repeal ( ! ridicul\s laws ( ,engl&1 ,g]many & ,au/ria direct$ aga9/ homo-sexuality1 s f> at lea/ z to make ! puni%m5ts ! lighte/ possible4 ,9 ! second "p ( ?is book x w be made cle> :y bo? ! active & ! passive p>ts 9 male homo-sexuality appe> disgraceful1 al?\gh ! desire is great] ?an 9 ! case ( ! normal relation ( a man & woman4 ,9 ! ab/ract !re is no e?ical diff]5ce betwe5 ! two4 ,9 spite ( all ! pres5t-day clam\r ab\t ! exi/5ce ( diff]5t rights = diff]5t individualities1 !re is only "o law t gov]ns mank9d1 j z !re is only "o logic & n sev]al logics4 ,x is 9 opposition to t law1 z well z to ! !ory ( puni%m5t accord+ to :i* ! legal (f5ce1 n ! moral (f5ce1 is puni%$1 t we =bid ! homo-sexuali/ to c>ry on 8 practices :il/ we all[ ! het]o-sexuali/ full play1 s long z bo? avoid op5 sc&al4 ,speak+ f ! /&po9t ( a pur] /ate ( humanity & ( a crim9al law unta9t$ by ! p$agogic idea ( puni%m5t z a det]r5t1 ! only logical & rational me?od ( treatm5t = sexual inv]ts w\ld be to all[ !m to seek & obta9 :at !y require :]e !y c1 t is to say1 among/ o!r inv]ts4 ,my !ory appe>s to me q incontrov]tible & conclusive1 & to af=d a complete explanation ( ! entire set ( ph5om5a4 ,! exposition1 h[ev]1 mu/ n[ face a set ( facts :i* appe> q oppos$ to x1 & :i* seem absolutely to contradict my ref]5ce ( sexual inv]sion to ! exi/5ce ( sexually int]m$iate types1 & my explanation ( ! law gov]n+ ! attraction ( ^! types = ea* o!r4 ,x is probably ! case t my explanation is suffici5t = all female sexual inv]ts1 b x is c]ta9ly true t !re are m5 ) v little ta9t ( femal5ess ab\t !m :o yet ex]t a v /rong influ5ce on memb]s ( _! own sex1 a /rong] influ5ce ?an t ( o!r m5 :o may h m femal5ess--an influ5ce :i* c be ex]t$ ev5 on v male m51 & an influ5ce :i*1 f9ally1 (t5 appe>s to be mu* great] ?an ! influ5ce any woman c ex]t on ^! m54 ,alb]t ,moll is ju/ifi$ 9 say+ z foll[s3 8,!re exi/ psy*o-sexual h]maphrodites :o are attract$ by memb]s ( bo? sexes1 b :o 9 ! case ( ea* sex appe> to c>e only = ! *>act]s peculi> to t sex2 &1 on ! o!r h&1 !re are also psy*o-sexual 787 h]maphrodites :o1 9 ! case ( ea* sex1 are attract$1 n by ! *>act]i/ics peculi> to t sex1 b by ^? :i* are ei!r sexually indiff]5t or ev5 antagoni/ic to ! sex 9 "q40 ,^u ?is di/9ction dep5ds ! diff]5ce betwe5 ! two sets ( ph5om5a indicat$ 9 ! title ( ?is *apt]--,homo-sexuality & ,p$]a/y4 ,! di/9ction may be express$ z foll[s3 ,! homo-sexuali/ is t type ( sexual inv]t :o pref]s v female m5 or v male wom51 9 accordance ) ! g5]al law ( sexual attraction4 ,! p$]a/1 on ! o!r h&1 may be attract$ ei!r by v male m5 or by v female wom51 b 9 ! latt] case only 9 s f> z he is n p$]a/ic4 ,moreov]1 8 incl9ation = ! male sex is /rong] ?an = ! female sex1 & is m deeply seat$ 9 8 nature4 ,! orig9 ( p$]a/y is a problem 9 itself & rema9s unsolv$ by ?is inve/igation4 ,,*apt] ,v ,,! ,,sci5ce ,,( ,,"* ,,& ,,! ,,sci5ce ,,( ,,=m ,9 view ( ! admitt$ close correspond5ce betwe5 matt] & m9d1 we may expect to f9d t ! conception ( sexually int]m$iate =ms1 if appli$ to m5tal facts1 w yield a ri* crop ( results4 ,! exi/5ce ( a female m5tal type & a male m5tal type c readily be imag9$ 7& ! que/ ( ^! types has be5 made by _m inve/igators71 b su* p]fect types nev] occur z actual individuals1 simply because 9 ! m9d1 z 9 ! body1 all sorts ( sexually int]m$iate conditions exi/4 ,my conception w also be ( great s]vice 9 help+ u to discrim9ate betwe5 ! diff]5t m5tal qualities1 & to ?r[ "s light into :at has always be5 a d>k corn] = psy*ologi/s--! diff]5ces betwe5 diff]5t individuals4 ,a great /ep w be made if we are able to supply grad$ categories = ! m5tal dia!sis ( individuals2 if x %all cease to be sci5tific to say t ! "* ( an individual is m]ely male or female2 b if we c make a measur$ judgm5t & say t su* & su* an "o is s _m p>ts male & s _m p>ts female4 ,:i* elem5t 9 any p>ticul> individual has done1 said1 or ?\ght ?is or ! o!r8 ,by mak+ ! answ] to su* a "q possible1 we %all h done mu* t[>ds ! def9ite description ( ! individual1 & ! new me?od w det]m9e ! direction ( future inve/igation4 ,! k ( ! pa/1 :i* set out f conceptions :i* 7 really confus$ av]ages1 has be5 equally f> f rea*+ ! broade/ tru?s z f se>*+ out ! mo/ intimate detail$ k4 ,?is failure ( pa/ me?ods gives u hope t ! pr9ciple ( sexually int]m$iate =ms may s]ve z ! f\ndation ( a sci5tific /udy ( "* & ju/ifies ! attempt to make ( x an illum9at+ pr9ciple = ! psy*ology ( individual diff]5ces4 ,its application to ! sci5ce ( "*1 :i*1 s f>1 has be5 9 ! h&s ( m]ely lit]>y au?ors1 & is f ! sci5tific po9t ( view an unt\*$ field1 is to be greet$ m w>mly z x is capable ( be+ us$ quantitatively1 s t we v5ture to e/imate ! p]c5tage ( mal5ess & femal5ess :i* an individual possesses ev5 9 ! m5tal qualities4 ,! answ] to ?is "q is n giv5 ev5 if we "k ! exact anatomical position ( an organism on ! scale /ret*+ f male to female1 al?\gh z a matt] ( fact congruity betwe5 bodily & m5tal sexuality is m common ?an incongruity4 ,b we mu/ rememb] :at 0 /at$ 9 *ap4 ii4 z to ! unev5 di/ribution ( sexuality ov] ! body4 ,! proportion ( ! male to ! female pr9ciple 9 ! same human be+ mu/ n be assum$ to be a con/ant quantity4 ,an important new conclusion mu/ be tak5 into acc\nt1 a conclusion :i* is necess>y to ! "r application ( ! pr9ciple :i* cle>s up 9 a /rik+ fa%ion e>li] psy*ological "w4 ,! fact is t e human be+ v>ies or oscillates betwe5 ! mal5ess & ! femal5ess ( 8 con/itution4 ,9 "s cases ^! oscillations are abnormally l>ge1 9 o!r cases s small z to escape obs]vation1 b !y are always pres5t1 & :5 !y are great !y may ev5 reveal !mselves 9 ! outw>d aspect ( ! body4 ,l ! v>iations 9 ! magnetism ( ! e>?1 ^! sexual oscillations are ei!r regul> or irregul>4 ,! regul> =ms are sometimes m9ute2 = in/ance1 _m m5 feel m male at night4 ,! l>ge & regul> oscillations correspond to ! great divisions ( organic life to :i* att5tion is only n[ be+ direct$1 & !y may ?r[ light ^u _m puzzl+ ph5om5a4 ,! irregul> oscillations probably dep5d *iefly ^u ! environm5t1 z = in/ance on ! sexuality ( surr\nd+ human be+s4 ,!y may help to expla9 "s curi\s po9ts 9 ! psy*ology ( a cr[d :i* h n yet receiv$ suffici5t att5tion4 ,9 %ort1 bi-sexuality _c be prop]ly obs]v$ 9 a s+le mom5t1 b mu/ be /udi$ ?r\gh successive p]iods ( "t4 ,?is "t-elem5t 9 psy*ological diff]5ces ( sexuality may be regul>ly p]iodic or n4 ,! sw+ t[>ds "o pole ( sexuality may be great] ?an ! foll[+ sw+ to ! o!r side4 ,al?\gh !oretically possible1 x seems to be extremely r>e = ! sw+ to ! male side to be exactly equal to ! sw+ t[>ds ! female side4 ,x may be admitt$ 9 pr9ciple1 be=e proce$+ to detail$ inve/igation1 t ! conception ( sexually int]m$iate =ms makes possible a m accurate description ( individual *>act]s 9 s f> z x aids 9 det]m9+ ! proportion ( male & female 9 ea* individual1 & ( measur+ ! oscillations to ea* side ( :i* any individual is capable4 ,a po9t ( me?od mu/ be decid$ at once1 z ^u x dep5ds ! c\rse ! inve/igation w pursue4 ,are we to beg9 by an empirical inve/igation ( ! almo/ innum]able int]m$iate conditions 9 m5tal sexuality1 or are we to set out ) ! ab/ract sexual types1 ! ideal psy*ological man & woman1 & !n inve/igate d$uctively h[ f> su* ideal pictures correspond ) concrete cases8 ,! =m] me?od is t :i* ! developm5t ( psy*ological k has pursu$2 ideals h be5 d]iv$ f facts1 sexual types con/ruct$ f obs]vation ( ! manifold complexity ( nature2 x w\ld be inductive & analytic4 ,! latt] mode1 d$uctive & syn!tic1 is m 9 accordance ) =mal logic4 ,i h be5 unwill+ to pursue ! second me?od z fully z is possible1 because e "o c apply = himself to concrete facts ! two well-def9$ extreme types2 once x is und]/ood t actual individuals are mixtures ( ! types1 x is simple to apply !ory to practice1 & ! actual pursuit ( detail$ cases w\ld involve mu* repetition & br+ little !oretical advantage4 ,! second me?od1 h[ev]1 is impracticable4 ,! collection ( ! long s]ies ( details f :i* ! inductions w\ld be made w\ld simply we>y ! read]4 ,9 ! fir/ or biological "p ( my "w1 ,i give little att5tion to ! extreme types1 b devote myself to ! fulle/ inve/igation ( ! int]m$iate /ages4 ,9 ! second "p1 ,i %all endeav\r to make z full a psy*ological analysis z possible ( ! *>act]s ( ! male & female types1 & w t\* only lightly on concrete in/ances4 ,i %all fir/ m5tion1 )\t lay+ too mu* /ress on !m1 "s ( ! m obvi\s m5tal *>act]i/ics ( ! int]m$iate conditions4 ,womani% m5 are usually extremely anxi\s to m>ry1 at lea/ 7,i m5tion ?is to prev5t misconception7 if a suffici5tly brilliant opportunity (f]s itself4 ,:5 x is possible1 !y ne>ly always m>ry :il/ !y are /ill q "y4 ,x is especially gratify+ to !m to get z wives fam\s wom51 arti/s or poets1 or s+]s & actresses4 ,womani% m5 are physically lazi] ?an o!r m5 9 proportion to ! degree ( _! womani%ness4 ,!re are 8m50 :o g out walk+ ) ! sole object ( display+ _! faces l ! faces ( wom51 hop+ t !y w be admir$1 aft] :i* !y return cont5t$ly home4 ,! anci5t 8,n>cissus0 0 a prototype ( su* p]sons4 ,^! p are naturally fa/idi\s ab\t ! dress+ ( _! hair1 _! app>el1 %oes1 & l952 !y are conc]n$ z to _! p]sonal appe>ance at all times1 & ab\t ! m9ute/ details ( _! toilet4 ,!y are consci\s ( e glance ?r[n on !m by o!r m51 & because ( ! female elem5t 9 !m1 !y are coquetti% 9 gait & demean\r4 ,viragoes1 on ! o!r h&1 frequ5tly are c>eless ab\t _! toilet1 & ev5 ab\t ! p]sonal c>e ( _! bodies2 !y take less "t 9 dress+ ?an _m womani% m54 ,! d&yism ( m5 on ! "o h&1 & mu* ( :at is call$ ! emancipation ( wom51 are due to ! increase 9 ! numb]s ( ^! epic5e creatures1 & n m]ely to a pass+ fa%ion4 ,inde$1 if "o inquires :y any?+ becomes ! fa%ion x w be f\nd t !re is a true cause = x4 ,! m femal5ess a woman possesses ! less w %e und]/& a man1 & ! sexual *>act]s ( a man w h ! great] influ5ce on h]4 ,?is is m ?an a m]e application ( ! law ( sexual attraction1 z ,i h already /at$ x4 ,s also ! m manly a man is ! less w he und]/& wom51 b ! m readily be influ5c$ by !m z wom54 ,^? m5 :o claim to und]/& wom5 are !mselves v ne>ly wom54 ,womani% m5 (t5 "k h[ to treat wom5 mu* bett] ?an manly m54 ,manly m51 except 9 mo/ r>e cases1 le>n h[ to deal ) wom5 only aft] long exp]i5ce1 & ev5 !n mo/ imp]fectly4 ,al?\gh ,i h be5 t\*+ "h 9 a mo/ sup]ficial way on :at are no m ?an t]ti>y sexual *>act]s1 ,i wi% to po9t out an application ( my conclusions to p$agogy4 ,i am conv9c$ t ! m ^! views are und]/ood ! m c]ta9ly w !y lead to an individual treatm5t 9 education4 ,at ! pres5t "t %oemak]s1 :o make %oes to measure1 deal m rationally ) individuals ?an our tea*]s & s*oolma/]s 9 _! application ( moral pr9ciples4 ,at pres5t ! sexually int]m$iate =ms ( individuals 7especially on ! female side7 are treat$ exactly z if !y 7 good examples ( ! ideal male or female types4 ,!re is want$ an 8or?opdic0 treatm5t ( ! s\l in/ead ( ! torture caus$ by ! application ( ready-made conv5tional %apes4 ,! pres5t sy/em /amps out mu* t is orig9al1 uproots mu* t is truly natural1 & di/orts mu* into artificial & unnatural =ms4 ,f "t immemorial !re h be5 only two sy/ems ( education2 "o = ^? :o come into ! _w designat$ by "o set ( *>act]s z males1 & ano!r = ^? :o are simil>ly assum$ to be females4 ,almo/ at once ! 8boys0 & ! 8girls0 are dress$ diff]5tly1 le>n to play diff]5t games1 g ?r\gh diff]5t c\rses ( in/ruction1 ! girls be+ put to /it*+ & s =?4 ,! int]m$iate individuals are plac$ at a great disadvantage4 ,& yet ! in/9cts natural to _! condition reveal !mselves quickly en\gh1 (t5 ev5 be=e pub]ty4 ,!re are boys :o l to play ) dolls1 :o le>n to knit & sew ) _! si/]s1 & :o are pleas$ to be giv5 girls' names4 ,!re are girls :o delight 9 ! noisi] sports ( _! bro!rs1 & :o make *ums & playmates ( !m4 ,aft] pub]ty1 !re is a /ill /rong] display ( ! innate diff]5ces4 ,manlike wom5 we> _! hair %ort1 affect manly dress1 /udy1 dr9k1 smoke1 are fond ( m\nta9e]+1 or devote !mselves passionately to sport4 ,womani% m5 gr[ _! hair long1 we> corsets1 are exp]ts 9 ! toilet devices ( wom51 & %[ ! greate/ read9ess to become fri5dly & intimate ) !m1 pref]r+ _! society to t ( m54 ,lat] on1 ! diff]5t laws & cu/oms to :i* ! s-call$ sexes are subject$ press !m z by a vice into di/9ctive m\lds4 ,! proposals :i* %\ld foll[ f my conclusions w enc\nt] m passive resi/ance1 ,i fe>1 9 ! case ( girls ?an 9 t ( boys4 ,i mu/ "h contradict1 9 ! mo/ positive fa%ion1 a dogma t is au?oritatively & widely ma9ta9$ at ! pres5t "t1 ! idea t all wom5 are alike1 t no individuals exi/ among/ wom54 ,x is true t among/ ^? individuals ^: con/itutions lie ne>] ! female side ?an ! male side1 ! diff]5ces & possibilities are n s great z among/ ^? on ! male side2 ! great] v>iability ( males is true n only = ! human race b = ! liv+ _w1 & is relat$ to ! pr9ciples e/abli%$ by ,d>w94 ,none ! less1 !re are pl5ty ( diff]5ces among/ wom54 ,! psy*ological orig9 ( ?is common error dep5ds *iefly on a fact t ,i expla9$ 9 *ap4 iii41 ! fact t e man 9 8 life becomes intimate only ) a gr\p ( wom5 def9$ by 8 own con/itution1 & s naturally he f9ds !m mu* alike4 ,= ! same reason1 & 9 ! same way1 "o may (t5 he> a woman say t all m5 are alike4 ,& ! n>r[ uni=m view ab\t m51 display$ by mo/ ( ! lead]s ( ! wom5's rights movem5t dep5ds on precisely ! same cause4 ,x is cle> t ! pr9ciple ( ! exi/5ce ( innum]able individual proportions ( ! male & female pr9ciples is a basis ( ! /udy ( "* :i* mu/ be appli$ 9 any rational s*eme ( p$agogy4 ,! sci5ce ( "* mu/ be associat$ ) "s =m ( psy*ology t takes into acc\nt "s !ory ( ! real exi/5ce ( m5tal ph5om5a 9 ! same fa%ion t anatomy is relat$ to physiology4 ,& s x is necess>y1 q ap>t f !oretical reasons1 to attempt to pursue a psy*ology ( individual diff]5ces4 ,?is attempt w be readily en\gh foll[$ by ^? :o believe 9 ! p>allelism betwe5 m9d & matt]1 = !y w see 9 psy*ology no m ?an ! physiology ( ! c5tral n]v\s sy/em1 & w readily admit t ! sci5ce ( "* mu/ be a si/] ( morphology4 ,z a matt] ( fact !re is great hope t 9 future *>act]ology & morphology w ea* greatly help ! o!r4 ,! pr9ciple ( sexually int]m$iate =ms1 & /ill m ! p>allelism betwe5 *>act]ology & morphology 9 ! wide/ application1 make u look =w>d to ! "t :5 physiognomy w take its hon\rable place among/ ! sci5ces1 a place :i* s _m h attempt$ to ga9 = x b z yet unsuccessfully4 ,! problem ( physiognomy is ! problem ( ! relation betwe5 ! /atic m5tal =ces & ! /atic bodily =ces1 j z ! problem ( physiological psy*ology deals ) ! dynamic aspect ( ! same relations4 ,x is a great error 9 me?od1 & 9 fact1 to treat ! /udy ( physiognomy1 because ( its difficulty1 z impracticable4 ,& yet ?is is ! attitude ( contempor>y sci5tific circles1 unconsci\sly p]haps r ?an consci\sly1 b occasionally becom+ obvi\s z = in/ance 9 ! case ( ! attempt ( von ,mbius to pursue ! "w ( ,gall ) reg>d to ! physiognomy ( ^? ) a natural aptitude = ma!matics4 ,if x be possible1 & _m h %[n t x is possible1 to judge correctly mu* ( ! "* ( an individual m]ely f ! exam9ation ( 8 ext]nal appe>ance1 )\t ! aid ( cross-exam9ation or guess+1 x _c be impossible to r$uce su* modes ( obs]vation to an exact me?od4 ,!re is little m requir$ ?an an exact /udy ( ! expression ( ! *>act]i/ic emotions & ! track+ 7to use a r\gh analogy7 ( ! r\tes ( ! cables pass+ to ! spee* c5tres4 ,none ! less x w be long be=e (ficial sci5ce ceases to reg>d ! /udy ( physiognomy z illegitimate4 ,al?\gh p w /ill believe 9 ! p>allelism ( m9d & body1 !y w cont9ue to treat ! physiognomi/ z z mu* ( a *>latan z until q rec5tly ! hypnoti/ 0 ?\ght to be4 ,none ! less1 all mank9d at lea/ unconsci\sly1 & intellig5t p]sons consci\sly1 w cont9ue to be physiognomi/s1 p w cont9ue to judge "* f ! nose1 al?\gh !y w n admit ! exi/5ce ( a sci5ce ( physiognomy1 & ! portraits ( celebrat$ m5 & ( murd]]s w cont9ue to int]e/ e "o4 ,i am incl9$ to believe t ! assumption ( a univ]sally acquir$ correspond5ce betwe5 m9d & body may be a hi!rto neglect$ fundam5tal function ( our m9d4 ,x is c]ta9ly ! case t e "o believes 9 physiognomy & actually practises x4 ,! pr9ciple ( ! exi/5ce ( a def9ite relation betwe5 m9d & body mu/ be accept$ z an illum9at+ axiom = psy*ological rese>*1 & x w be = religion & metaphysics to "w out ! details ( a relation%ip :i* mu/ be accept$ z exi/+4 ,:e!r or no ! sci5ce ( "* c be l9k$ ) morphology1 x w be valuable n only to ^! sci5ces b to physiognomy if we c p5etrate a little deep] into ! confusion t n[ reigns 9 ord] to f9d if wrong me?ods h n be5 responsible = x4 ,i hope t ! attempt ,i am ab\t to make w lead "s little way into ! labyr9?1 & w prove to be ( g5]al application4 ,"s m5 are fond ( dogs & dete/ cats2 o!rs are devot$ to cats & dislike dogs4 ,inquir+ m9ds h delight$ to ask 9 su* cases1 ,:y are cats attractive to "o p]son1 dogs to ano!r8 ,:y8 ,i d n ?9k t ?is is ! mo/ fruitful way ( /at+ ! problem4 ,i believe x to be m important to ask 9 :at o!r respects lov]s ( dogs & ( cats diff] f "o ano!r4 ,! habit1 :]e "o diff]5ce has be5 detect$1 ( seek+ = ! associat$ diff]5ces1 w prove extremely useful n only to pure morphology & to ! sci5ce ( "*1 b ultimately to physiognomy1 ! meet+-po9t ( ! two sci5ces4 ,ari/otle po9t$ out long ago t _m *>act]i/ics ( animals d n v>y indep5d5tly ( ea* o!r4 ,lat] on ,cuvi]1 9 p>ticul>1 b also ,ge(frey ,/4 ,hilaire & ,d>w9 made a special /udy ( ^! 8correlations40 ,occasionally ! association ( ! *>act]s is easy to und]/& on obvi\s utilit>ian pr9ciples2 :]e = in/ance ! alim5t>y canal is adapt$ to ! dige/ion ( fle%1 ! jaws & body mu/ be adapt$ = ! capture ( ! prey4 ,b association su* z t betwe5 rum9ant /oma*s & ! pres5ce ( clov5 ho(s & ( horns 9 ! male1 or ( immunity to c]ta9 poisons ) p>ticul> col\r+ ( ! hair1 or among dome/ic pigeons ( %ort bills ) small feet1 ( long bills ) l>ge feet1 or 9 cats ( deafness ) :ite fur & blue eyes--su* are extremely difficult to ref] to a s+le purpose4 ,i d n 9 ! lea/ mean to ass]t t sci5ce mu/ be cont5t ) no m ?an ! m]e discov]y ( correlations4 ,su* a position w\ld be little bett] ?an t ( a p]son :o 0 satisfi$ by f9d+ out t ! plac+ ( a p5ny 9 ! slot ( a p>ticul> automatic ma*9e always 0 foll[$ by ! release ( a box ( mat*es4 ,x w\ld be mak+ resignation ! lead+ pr9ciple ( metaphysics4 ,we %all get a good deal fur!r by su* correlations1 z1 = in/ance1 t ( long hair & normal ov>ies2 b ^! are )9 ! sph]e ( physiology1 n ( morphology4 ,probably ! goal ( an ideal morphology c\ld be rea*$ be/ n by d$uctions f an attempt$ syn!sis ( obs]vations on all ! animals t creep on ! l& or swim 9 ! sea 79 ! fa%ion ( collectors ( po/age /amps71 b by a complete /udy ( a few organisms4 ,cuvi] by a k9d ( guess-"w us$ to recon/ruct an entire animal f a s+le bone3 full k w\ld enable u to d ?is 9 a complete1 def9ite1 qualitative & quantitative fa%ion4 ,:5 su* a k has be5 atta9$1 ea* s+le "* w at once def9e & limit = u ! possibilities ( ! o!r *>act]s4 ,su* a true & logical ext5sion ( ! pr9ciple ( correlation 9 morphology is really an application ( ! !ory ( functions to ! liv+ _w4 ,x w\ld n exclude ! /udy ( causation1 b limit x to its prop] sph]e4 ,no d\bt ! 8causes0 ( ! correlations ( organisms mu/ be s\ght = 9 ! idioplasm4 ,! possibility ( apply+ ! pr9ciple ( correlat$ v>iation to psy*ology dep5ds on diff]5tial psy*ology1 ! /udy ( psy*ological v>iation4 ,i believe1 moreov]1 t a comb9ation ( /udy ( ! anatomical 8habit10 & ! m5tal *>act]i/ics w lead to a /atical psy*o-physics1 a true sci5ce ( physiognomy4 ,! rule ( inve/igation 9 all ! ?ree sci5ces w h to be t ! "q is pos$ z foll[s2 giv5 t two organisms are kn[n to diff] 9 "o respect1 9 :at o!r respects are !y diff]5t8 ,?is w be ! gold5 rule ( discov]y1 &1 foll[+ x1 we %all no long] lose ourselves hopelessly 9 ! d>k maze t surr\nds ! answ] to ! "q 8,:y80 ,z soon z we are in=m$ z to "o diff]5ce1 we mu/ dilig5tly seek out ! o!rs1 & ! m]e putt+ ( ! "q 9 ?is =m w directly br+ ab\t _m discov]ies4 ,! consci\s pursuit ( ?is rule ( inve/igation w be p>ticul>ly valuable 9 deal+ ) problems ( ! m9d4 ,m5tal actions are n co-exi/5t 9 ! s5se ( physical *>act]s1 & x has be5 only by accid5tal & =tunate *ances1 :5 ! ph5om5a h pres5t$ !mselves 9 rapid succession 9 an individual1 t discov]ies ( correlation 9 m5tal ph5om5a h be5 notic$4 ,! correlat$ m5tal ph5om5a may be v diff]5t 9 k9d1 & x is only :5 we "k :at we are aft] & delib]ately seek = !m t we %all be able to transc5d ! special difficulties ( ! k9d ( mat]ial we are inve/igat+1 & s secure = psy*ology :at is comp>atively simple 9 anatomy4 ,,*apt] ,,vi ,,emancipat$ ,,wom5 ,z an imm$iate application ( ! attempt to e/abli% ! pr9ciple ( int]m$iate sexual =ms by means ( a diff]5tial psy*ology1 we mu/ n[ come to ! "q :i* x is ! special object ( ?is book to answ]1 !oretically & practically1 ,i mean ! woman "q1 !oretically s f> z x is n a matt] ( e?nology & national economics1 & practically 9 s f> z x is n m]ely a matt] ( law & dome/ic economy1 t is to say1 ( social sci5ce 9 ! wide/ s5se4 ,! answ] :i* ?is *apt] is ab\t to give mu/ n be consid]$ z f9al or z exhau/ive4 ,x is r a necess>y prelim9>y inve/igation1 & does n g beyond d$uctions f ! pr9ciples t ,i h e/abli%$4 ,x w deal ) ! exploration ( individual cases & w n attempt to f\nd on ^! any laws ( g5]al significance4 ,! practical indications t x w give are n moral maxims t c\ld or w\ld guide ! future2 !y are no m ?an te*nical rules ab/ract$ f pa/ cases4 ,! idea ( male & female types w n be discuss$ "h2 t is res]v$ = ! second "p ( my book4 ,?is prelim9>y inve/igation w deal ) only ^? *>act]o-logical conclusions f ! pr9ciple ( sexually int]m$iate =ms t are ( significance 9 ! woman "q4 ,! g5]al direction ( ! inve/igation is easy to und]/& f :at has already be5 /at$4 ,a woman's dem& = emancipation & h] qualification = x are 9 direct proportion to ! am\nt ( mal5ess 9 h]4 ,! idea ( emancipation1 h[ev]1 is _m-sid$1 & its indef9it5ess is increas$ by its association ) _m practical cu/oms :i* h no?+ to d ) ! !ory ( emancipation4 ,by ! t]m emancipation ( a woman ,i imply nei!r h] ma/]y at home nor h] subjection ( h] husb&4 ,i h n 9 m9d ! c\rage :i* enables h] to g freely by night or by day unaccompani$ 9 public places1 or ! disreg>d ( social rules :i* prohibit ba*elor wom5 f receiv+ visits f m51 or discuss+ or li/5+ to discussions ( sexual matt]s4 ,i exclude f my view ! desire = economic indep5d5ce1 ! becom+ fit = positions 9 te*nical s*ools1 univ]sities & cons]vatoires or tea*]s' in/itutes4 ,& !re may be _m o!r simil> movem5ts associat$ ) ! ^w emancipation :i* ,i d n int5d to deal )4 ,emancipation1 z ,i mean to discuss x1 is n ! wi% = an outw>d equality ) man1 b :at is ( real importance 9 ! woman "q1 ! deep-seat$ crav+ to acquire man's "*1 to atta9 8 m5tal & moral fre$om1 to rea* 8 real int]e/s & 8 creative p[]4 ,i ma9ta9 t ! real female elem5t has nei!r ! desire nor ! capacity = emancipation 9 ?is s5se4 ,all ^? :o are /riv+ = ?is real emancipation1 all wom5 :o are truly fam\s & are ( conspicu\s m5tal ability1 to ! fir/ glance ( an exp]t reveal "s ( ! anatomical *>act]s ( ! male1 "s ext]nal bodily resemblance to a man4 ,^? s-call$ 8wom50 :o h be5 held up to admiration 9 ! pa/ & pres5t1 by ! advocates ( woman's rights1 z examples ( :at wom5 c d1 h almo/ inv>iably be5 :at ,i h describ$ z sexually int]m$iate =ms4 ,! v fir/ ( ! hi/orical examples1 ,sappho h]self1 has be5 h&$ d[n to u z an example ( ! sexual inv]t1 & f h] "n has be5 d]iv$ ! accept$ t]ms = p]v]t$ sexual relations betwe5 wom54 ,! cont5ts ( ! second & ?ird *apt] ?us at once become important ) reg>d to ! woman "q4 ,! *>act]ological mat]ial at our disposal ) reg>d to celebrat$ & emancipat$ wom5 is too vague to s]ve z ! f\ndation ( any satisfactory !ory4 ,:at is want$ is "s pr9ciple :i* w\ld enable u to det]m9e at :at po9t betwe5 male & female su* individuals 7 plac$4 ,my law ( sexual aff9ity is su* a pr9ciple4 ,its application to ! facts ( homo-sexuality %[$ t ! woman :o attracts & is attract$ by o!r wom5 is h]self half male4 ,int]pret+ ! hi/orical evid5ce at our disposal 9 ! light ( ?is pr9ciple1 we f9d t ! degree ( emancipation & ! proportion ( mal5ess 9 ! composition ( a woman are practically id5tical4 ,sappho 0 only ! =]unn] ( a long l9e ( fam\s wom5 :o 7 ei!r homo-sexually or bisexually incl9$4 ,classical s*ol>s h def5d$ ,sappho w>mly aga9/ ! implication t !re 0 any?+ m ?an m]e fri5d%ip 9 h] relations ) h] own sex1 z if ! accusation 7 necess>ily degrad+4 ,9 ! second "p ( my book1 h[ev]1 ,i %all %[ reasons 9 fav\r ( ! possibility t homo-sexuality is a high] =m ?an het]o-sexuality4 ,= ! pres5t1 x is en\gh to say t homo-sexuality 9 a woman is ! outcome ( h] mascul9ity & presupposes a high] degree ( developm5t4 ,ca!r9e ,,ii4 ( ,russia1 & ,que5 ,*ri/9a ( ,sw$51 ! highly gift$ al?\gh deaf1 dumb & bl9d1 ,laura ,bridgman1 ,george ,s&1 & a v l>ge numb] ( highly gift$ wom5 & girls conc]n+ :om ,i myself h be5 able to collect in=mation1 7 p>tly bisexual1 p>tly homo-sexual4 ,i %all n[ turn to o!r indications 9 ! case ( ! l>ge numb] ( emancipat$ wom5 reg>d+ :om !re is no evid5ce z to homo-sexuality1 & ,i %all %[ t my attribution ( mal5ess is no caprice1 no egoti/ical wi% ( a man to associate all ! high] manife/ations ( intellig5ce ) ! male sex4 ,j z homo-sexual or bisexual wom5 reveal _! mal5ess by _! pref]5ce ei!r = wom5 or = womani% m51 s het]o-sexual wom5 display mal5ess 9 _! *oice ( a male p>tn] :o is n prepond]at+ly male4 ,! mo/ fam\s ( ,george ,s&'s _m affairs 7 ^? ) de ,musset1 ! mo/ effem9ate & s5tim5tal poet1 & ) ,*op91 :o might be describ$ almo/ z ! only female musician1 s effem9ate are 8 compositions4#e ,vittoria ,colonna is less kn[n because ( h] own poetic compositions ?an because ( ! infatuation = h] %[n by ,mi*ael ,angelo1 ^: e>li] fri5d%ips _h be5 ) y\?s4 ,! au?oress1 ,daniel ,/]n1 0 ! mi/ress ( ,franz ,liszt1 ^: life & compositions 7 extremely effem9ate1 & :o _h a dubi\s fri5d%ip ) ,wagn]1 ! int]pretation ( :i* 0 made pla9 by 8 lat] devotion to ,k+ ,ludwig ,,ii4 ( ,bav>ia4 ,madame de ,/aal1 ^: "w on ,g]many is probably ! greate/ book ev] produc$ by a woman1 is suppos$ to h be5 intimate ) ,augu/ ,wilhelm ,s*legel1 :o 0 a homo-sexuali/1 & :o _h be5 tutor to h] *ildr54 ,at c]ta9 p]iods ( 8 life1 ! face ( ! husb& ( ,cl>a ,s*umann might h be5 tak5 z t ( a woman1 & a good deal ( 8 music1 al?\gh c]ta9ly n all1 0 effem9ate4 #e ,*op9's portraits %[ 8 effem9acy pla9ly4 ,m]ime describes ,george ,s& z be+ z ?9 z a nail4 ,at ! fir/ meet+ ( ! two1 ! lady behav$ l a man1 & ! man l a girl4 ,he blu%$ :5 %e look$ at him & began to pay him complim5ts 9 h] bass voice4 ,:5 !re is no evid5ce z to ! sexual relations ( fam\s wom51 we c /ill obta9 important conclusions f ! details ( _! p]sonal appe>ance4 ,su* data support my g5]al proposition4 ,george ,eliot _h a broad1 massive =ehead2 h] movem5ts1 l h] expression1 7 quick & decid$1 & lack$ all womanly grace4 ,! face ( ,lav9ia ,fontana 0 intellectual & decid$1 v r>ely *>m+2 :il/ t ( ,ra*el ,ruys* 0 almo/ :olly mascul9e4 ,! biography ( t orig9al poetess1 ,annette von ,dro/e-,hl%(f1 speaks ( h] wiry1 unwomanly frame1 & ( h] face z be+ mascul9e1 & recall+ t ( ,dante4 ,! au?oress & ma!matician1 ,sonia ,k[alevska1 l ,sappho1 _h an abnormally scanty gr[? ( hair1 /ill less ?an is ! fa%ion among/ ! poetesses & female /ud5ts ( ! pres5t day4 ,x w\ld be a s]i\s omission to =get ,rosa ,bonheur1 ! v di/+ui%$ pa9t]2 & x w\ld be difficult to po9t to a s+le female trait 9 h] appe>ance or "*4 ,! notori\s ,madame ,blavatsky is extremely mascul9e 9 h] appe>ance4 ,i might ref] to _m o!r emancipat$ wom5 at pres5t well kn[n to ! public1 consid]ation ( :om has provid$ me ) mu* mat]ial = ! support ( my proposition t ! true female elem5t1 ! ab/ract 8woman10 has no?+ to d ) emancipation4 ,!re is "s hi/orical ju/ification = ! say+ 8! long] ! hair ! small] ! bra910 b ! res]vations made 9 *ap4 ii4 mu/ be tak5 into acc\nt4 ,x is only ! male elem5t 9 emancipat$ wom5 t craves = emancipation4 ,!re is1 !n1 a /rong] reason ?an has g5]ally be5 suppos$ = ! famili> assumption ( male pseudonyms by wom5 writ]s4 ,_! *oice is a mode ( giv+ expression to ! inh]5t mal5ess !y feel2 & ?is is /ill m m>k$ 9 ! case ( ^? :o1 l ,george ,s&1 h a pref]5ce = male attire & mascul9e pursuits4 ,! motive = *oos+ a man's "n spr+s f ! feel+ t x corresponds ) _! own "* mu* m ?an f any desire = increas$ notice f ! public4 ,z a matt] ( fact1 up to ! pres5t1 p>tly ow+ to int]e/ 9 ! sex "q1 wom5's writ+s h ar\s$ m int]e/1 cet]is p>ibus1 ?an ^? ( m52 &1 ow+ to ! issues involv$1 h always receiv$ a full] consid]ation &1 if !re 7 any ju/ification1 a great] me$ ( praise ?an has be5 accord$ to a man's "w ( equal m]it4 ,at ! pres5t "t especially _m wom5 h atta9$ celebrity by "w :i*1 if x _h be5 produc$ by a man1 w\ld h pass$ almo/ unnotic$4 ,let u pause & exam9e ?is m closely4 ,if we attempt to apply a /&>d tak5 f ! names ( m5 :o are ( ackn[l$g$ value 9 philosophy1 sci5ce1 lit]ature & art1 to ! long li/ ( wom5 :o h a*iev$ "s k9d ( fame1 !re w at once be a mis]able collapse4 ,judg$ 9 ?is way1 x is difficult to grant any real degree ( m]it to wom5 l ,angelica ,kaufmann or ,madame ,lebrun1 ,f]nan ,caball]o or ,hros)a von ,g&]%eim1 ,m>y ,som]ville or ,george ,eg]ton1 ,elizabe? ,b>rett ,br[n+ or ,sophie ,g]ma91 ,anna ,m>ia ,s*urmann or ,sybilla ,m]ian4 ,i w n speak ( names 7su* z t ( ,dro/e-,hl%(f7 =m]ly s ov]-rat$ 9 ! annals ( fem9ism1 nor w ,i ref] to ! measure ( fame claim$ = or by liv+ wom54 ,x is en\gh to make ! g5]al /atem5t t !re is n a s+le woman 9 ! hi/ory ( ?\ght1 n ev5 ! mo/ manlike1 :o c be tru?fully comp>$ ) m5 ( fif? or six?-rate g5ius1 = in/ance ) ,rck]t z a poet1 ,van ,dyck z a pa9t]1 or ,s*eirma*] z a philosoph]4 ,if we elim9ate hy/]ical vision>ies1#f su* z ! ,sybils1 ! ,prie/esses ( ,delphi1 ,b\rignon1 ,kett5b]g1 ,jeanne de la ,mo! ,guyon1 ,joanna ,s\?cote1 ,beate ,/urm91 ,/4 ,t]esa1 !re /ill rema9 cases l t ( ,m>ie ,ba%kirtseff4 ,s f> z ,i c rememb] f h] portrait1 %e at lea/ seem$ to be q womanly 9 face & figure1 al?\gh h] =ehead 0 r mascul9e4 ,b to any "o :o /udies h] pictures 9 ! ,salle des ,etrang]s 9 ! ,luxemburg ,gall]y 9 ,p>is1 & comp>es !m ) ^? ( h] ador$ ma/]1 ,ba/i5 ,lepage1 x is pla9 t %e simply _h assimilat$ ! /yle ( ! latt]1 z 9 ,goe!'s 8,elective ,aff9ities0 ,ottilie acquir$ ! h&writ+ ( ,edu>d4 #f ,hy/]ia is ! pr9cipal cause ( mu* ( ! intellectual activity ( _m ( ! wom5 above m5tion$4 ,b ! usual view1 t ^! cases are pa?ological1 is too limit$ an int]pretation1 z ,i %all %[ 9 ! second "p ( ?is "w4 ,!re rema9 ! int]e/+ & n infrequ5t cases :]e ! tal5t ( a clev] family seems to rea* its maximum 9 a female memb] ( ! family4 ,b x is only tal5t t is transmitt$ 9 ?is way1 n g5ius4 ,m>g>e! van ,eyck & ,sab9a von ,/e9ba* =m ! be/ illu/rations ( ! k9d ( arti/s :o1 accord+ to ,ern/ ,guhl1 an au?or ) a great admiration = wom5-work]s1 8h be5 und\bt$ly influ5c$ 9 _! *oice ( an arti/ic call+ by _! fa!rs1 mo!rs1 or bro!rs4 ,9 o!r words1 !y f\nd _! inc5tive 9 _! own families4 ,!re are two or ?ree hundr$ ( su* cases on record1 & probably _m hundr$s m c\ld be add$ )\t exhau/+ ! numb]s ( simil> in/ances40 ,9 ord] to give due weight to ^! /ati/ics x may be m5tion$ t ,guhl _h j be5 speak+ ( 8r\ghly1 a ?\s& names ( wom5 arti/s kn[n to u40 ,?is concludes my hi/orical review ( ! emancipat$ wom54 ,x has ju/ifi$ ! ass]tion t real desire = emancipation & real fitness = x are ! outcome ( a woman's mal5ess4 ,! va/ majority ( wom5 h nev] paid special att5tion to art or to sci5ce1 & reg>d su* occupations m]ely z high] bran*es ( manual lab\r1 or if !y pr(ess a c]ta9 devotion to su* subjects1 x is *iefly z a mode ( attract+ a p>ticul> p]son or gr\p ( p]sons ( ! opposite sex4 ,ap>t f ^!1 a close inve/igation %[s t wom5 really int]e/$ 9 intellectual matt]s are sexually int]m$iate =ms4 ,if x be ! case t ! desire = fre$om & equality ) man occurs only 9 mascul9e wom51 ! inductive conclusion foll[s t ! female pr9ciple is n consci\s ( a necessity = emancipation2 & ! argum5t becomes /rong] if we rememb] t x is bas$ on an exam9ation ( ! acc\nts ( individual cases & n on psy*ical inve/igation ( an 8ab/ract woman40 ,if we n[ look at ! "q ( emancipation f ! po9t ( view ( hygi5e 7n morality7 !re is no d\bt z to ! h>m 9 x4 ,! undesirability ( emancipation lies 9 ! excitem5t & agitation involv$4 ,x induces wom5 :o h no real orig9al capacity b und\bt$ imitative p[]s to attempt to /udy or write1 f v>i\s motives1 su* z vanity or ! desire to attract admir]s4 ,:il/ x _c be d5i$ t !re are a good _m wom5 ) a real crav+ = emancipation & = high] education1 ^! set ! fa%ion & are foll[$ by a ho/ ( o!rs :o get up a ridicul\s agitation to conv9ce !mselves ( ! reality ( _! views4 ,& _m o!rwise e/imable & wor?y wives use ! cry to ass]t !mselves aga9/ _! husb&s1 :il/ daught]s take x z a me?od ( rebell+ aga9/ mat]nal au?ority4 ,! practical outcome ( ! :ole matt] w\ld be z foll[s2 x be+ rememb]$ t ! issues are too mutable = ! e/abli%m5t ( uni=m rules or laws4 ,let !re be ! free/ scope giv5 to1 & ! fewe/ h9drances put 9 ! way ( all wom5 ) mascul9e dispositions :o feel a psy*ical necessity to devote !mselves to mascul9e occupations & are physically fit to und]take !m4 ,b ! idea ( mak+ an emancipation p>ty1 ( aim+ at a social revolution1 mu/ be ab&on$4 ,away ) ! :ole 8woman's movem5t10 ) its unnaturalness & artificiality & its fundam5tal errors4 ,x is mo/ important to h done ) ! s5seless cry = 8full equality10 = ev5 ! male/ woman is sc>cely m ?an #ej p] c5t4 male1 & x is only to t male "p ( h] t %e owes h] special capacity or :atev] importance %e may ev5tually ga94 ,x is absurd to make comp>isons betwe5 ! few really intellectual wom5 & "o's av]age exp]i5ce ( m51 & to d$uce1 z has be5 done1 ev5 ! sup]iority ( ! female sex4 ,z ,d>w9 po9t$ out1 ! prop] comp>ison is betwe5 ! mo/ highly develop$ individuals ( two /ocks4 8,if two li/s10 ,d>w9 wrote 9 ! 8,desc5t ( ,man10 87 made ( ! mo/ em95t m5 & wom5 9 poetry1 pa9t+1 sculpture1 music--compris+ composition & p]=mance1 hi/ory1 sci5ce1 & philosophy1 ) half a doz5 names "u ea* subject1 ! two li/s w\ld n be> comp>ison40 ,moreov]1 if ^! li/s 7 c>efully exam9$ x w\ld be se5 t ! wom5's li/ w\ld prove ! s\ndness ( my !ory ( ! mal5ess ( _! g5ius1 & ! comp>ison w\ld be /ill less pleas+ to ! *ampions ( woman's rights4 ,x is frequ5tly urg$ t x is necess>y to create a public feel+ 9 fav\r ( ! full & un*eck$ m5tal developm5t ( wom54 ,su* an argum5t ov]looks ! fact t 8emancipation10 ! 8woman "q10 8wom5's rights movem5ts10 are no new ?+s 9 hi/ory1 b h always be5 ) u1 al?\gh ) v>y+ prom95ce at diff]5t times 9 hi/ory4 ,x also l>gely exagg]ates ! difficulties m5 place 9 ! way ( ! m5tal developm5t ( wom51 especially at ! pres5t "t4#g ,fur!rmore x neglects ! fact t at ! pres5t "t x is n ! true woman :o clam\rs = emancipation1 b only ! mascul9e type ( woman1 :o miscon/rues h] own "* & ! motives t actuate h] :5 %e =mulates h] dem&s 9 ! "n ( woman4 #g ,!re h be5 _m celebrities among/ m5 :o receiv$ practically no education--= in/ance1 ,rob]t ,burns & ,wolfram von ,es*5ba*2 b !re are no simil> cases among/ wom5 to comp>e ) !m4 ,z has be5 ! case ) e o!r movem5t 9 hi/ory1 s also x has be5 ) ! contempor>y woman's movem5t4 ,its orig9ators 7 conv9c$ t x 0 be+ put =w>d = ! fir/ "t1 & t su* a ?+ _h nev] be5 ?\ght ( be=e4 ,!y ma9ta9$ t wom5 _h hi!rto be5 held 9 bondage & envelop$ 9 d>kness by man1 & t x 0 high "t = h] to ass]t h]self & claim h] natural rights4 ,b ! prototype ( ?is movem5t1 z ( o!r movem5ts1 occurr$ 9 ! e>lie/ times4 ,anci5t hi/ory & m$ival times alike give u in/ances ( wom5 :o1 9 social relations & intellectual matt]s1 f\ght = su* emancipation1 & ( male & female apologi/s ( ! female sex4 ,x is totally errone\s to sugge/ t hi!rto wom5 h _h no opportunity = ! undi/urb$ developm5t ( _! m5tal p[]s4 ,jacob ,burckh>dt1 speak+ ( ! ,r5aissance1 says3 8,! greate/ possible praise :i* c\ld be giv5 to ! ,italian wom5-celebrities ( ! "t 0 to say t !y 7 l m5 9 bra9s & disposition60 ,! virile de$s ( wom5 record$ 9 ! epics1 especially ^? ( ,boi>do & ,ario/o1 %[ ! ideal ( ! "t4 ,to call a woman a 8virago0 n[adays w\ld be a d\btful complim5t1 b x orig9ally meant an hon\r4 ,wom5 7 fir/ all[$ on ! /age 9 ! sixte5? c5tury1 & actresses date f t "t4 8,at t p]iod x 0 admitt$ t wom5 7 j z capable z m5 ( embody+ ! highe/ possible arti/ic ideals40 ,x 0 ! p]iod :5 panegyrics on ! female sex 7 rife2 ,sir ,?omas ,m claim$ = x full equality ) ! male sex1 & ,agrippa von ,nette%eim goes s f> z to repres5t wom5 z sup]ior to m56 ,& yet ?is 0 all lo/ = ! fair sex1 & ! :ole "q sank into ! oblivion f :i* ! n9ete5? c5tury recall$ x4 ,is x n v rem>kable t ! agitation = ! emancipation ( wom5 seems to repeat itself at c]ta9 int]vals 9 ! _w's hi/ory1 & la/s = a def9ite p]iod8 ,x has be5 notic$ t 9 ! t5?1 fifte5?1 & sixte5?1 & n[ aga9 9 ! n9ete5? & tw5tie? c5turies1 ! agitation = ! emancipation ( wom5 has be5 m m>k$1 & ! woman's movem5t m vigor\s ?an 9 ! int]v5+ p]iods4 ,x w\ld be premature to f\nd a hypo!sis on ! data at our disposal1 b ! possibility ( a va/ly important p]iodicity mu/ be borne 9 m9d1 ( regul>ly recurr+ p]iods 9 :i* x may be t !re is an excess ( production ( h]maphrodite & sexually int]m$iate =ms4 ,su* a /ate ( affairs is n unkn[n 9 ! animal k+dom4 ,accord+ to my int]pretation1 su* a p]iod w\ld be "o ( m9imum 8gono*orism10 cleavage ( ! sexes2 & x w\ld be m>k$1 on ! "o h&1 by an increas$ production ( male wom51 & on ! o!r1 by a simil> increase 9 female m54 ,!re is /rong evid5ce 9 fav\r ( su* a p]iodicity2 if x occurs x may be associat$ ) ! 8secessioni/ ta/e10 :i* idealis$ tall1 lanky wom5 ) flat *e/s & n>r[ hips4 ,! enorm\s rec5t increase 9 a k9d ( d&ifi$ homo-sexuality may be due to ! increas+ effem9acy ( ! age1 & ! peculi>ities ( ! ,pre-,raphaelite movem5t may h a simil> explanation4 ,! exi/5ce ( su* p]iods 9 organic life1 comp>able ) /ages 9 individual life1 b ext5d+ ov] sev]al g5]ations1 w\ld1 if prov$1 ?r[ mu* light on _m obscure po9ts 9 human hi/ory1 conc]n+ :i* ! s-call$ 8hi/orical solutions10 & especially ! economic-mat]iali/ic views n[ 9 vogue h prov$ s futile4 ,! hi/ory ( ! _w f ! biological /&po9t has /ill to be writt52 x lies 9 ! future4 ,"h ,i c d little m ?an indicate ! direction :i* future "w %\ld take4 ,7 x prov$ t at c]ta9 p]iods few] h]maphrodite be+s 7 produc$1 & at c]ta9 o!r p]iods m1 x w\ld appe> t ! ris+ & fall+1 ! p]iodic occurr5ce & disappe>ance ( ! woman movem5t 9 an unfail+ rhy?m ( ebb & fl[1 0 "o ( ! expressions ( ! prepond]ance ( mascul9e & fem99e wom5 ) ! concomitant great] or less] desire = emancipation4 ,obvi\sly ,i d n take into acc\nt 9 relation to ! woman "q ! l>ge numb] ( womanly wom51 ! wives ( ! prolific artisan class :om economic pressure =ces to factory or field lab\r4 ,! connection betwe5 indu/rial progress & ! woman "q is mu* less close ?an is usually realis$1 especially by ! ,social ,democratic ,gr\p4 ,! relation betwe5 ! m5tal en]gy requir$ = intellectual & = indu/rial pursuits is ev5 less4 ,france1 = in/ance1 al?\gh x c boa/ ?ree ( ! mo/ fam\s wom51 has nev] _h a successful woman's movem5t1 & yet 9 no o!r ,european c\ntry are !re s _m really bus9esslike1 capable wom54 ,! /ruggle = ! mat]ial necessities ( life has no?+ to d ) ! /ruggle = intellectual developm5t1 & a %>p di/9ction mu/ be made betwe5 ! two4 ,! prospects ( ! movem5t = intellectual advance on ! "p ( wom5 are n v promis+2 b /ill less promis+ is ano!r view1 sometimes discuss$ 9 ! same connection1 ! view t ! human race is mov+ t[>ds a complete sexual diff]5tiation1 a def9ite sexual dimorphism4 ,! latt] view seems to me fundam5tally unt5able1 because 9 ! high] gr\ps ( ! animal k+dom !re is no evid5ce = ! increase ( sexual dimorphism4 ,worms & rotif]s1 _m birds & ! m&rills among/ ! apes1 h m advanc$ sexual dimorphism ?an man4 ,on ! view t su* an increas$ sexual dimorphism 7 to be expect$1 ! necessity = emancipation w\ld gradually disappe> z mank9d became sep>at$ into ! completely male & ! completely female4 ,on ! o!r h&1 ! view t !re w be p]iodical resurrections ( ! woman's movem5t w\ld r$uce ! :ole affair to ridicul\s impot5ce1 mak+ x only an ephem]al phase 9 ! hi/ory ( mank9d4 ,a complete oblit]ation w be ! fate ( any emancipation movem5t :i* attempts to place ! :ole sex 9 a new relation to society1 & to see 9 man its p]petual oppressor4 ,a corps ( ,amazons might be =m$1 b z "t w5t on ! mat]ial = ! corps w\ld cease to occur4 ,! hi/ory ( ! woman movem5t dur+ ! ,r5aissance & its complete disappe>ance conta9s a lesson = ! advocates ( wom5's rights4 ,real intellectual fre$om _c be atta9$ by an agitat$ mass2 x mu/ be f\ght = by ! individual4 ,:o is ! enemy8 ,:at are ! ret>d+ influ5ces8 ,! greate/1 ! "o enemy ( ! emancipation ( wom5 is woman h]self4 ,x is left to ! second "p ( my "w to prove ?is4 ,,second ,,or ,,pr9cipal ,,"p ,,! ,,sexual ,,types ,,*apt] ,i ,,man ,,& ,,woman 8,all t a man does is physiognomical ( him40 ,,c>lyle4 ,a free field = ! inve/igation ( ! actual contra/s betwe5 ! sexes is ga9$ :5 we recognise t male & female1 man & woman1 mu/ be consid]$ only z types1 & t ! exi/+ individuals1 ^u ^: qualities !re has be5 s mu* controv]sy1 are mixtures ( ! types 9 diff]5t proportions4 ,sexually int]m$iate =ms1 :i* are ! only actually exi/+ individuals1 7 dealt ) 9 a m or less s*ematic fa%ion 9 ! fir/ "p ( ?is book4 ,consid]ation ( ! g5]al biological application ( my !ory 0 ent]$ ^u !re2 b n[ ,i h to make mank9d ! special subject ( my inve/igation1 & to %[ ! defects ( ! results ga9$ by ! me?od ( introspective analysis1 z ^! results mu/ be qualifi$ by ! univ]sal exi/5ce ( sexually int]m$iate conditions4 ,9 plants & animals ! pres5ce ( h]maphroditism is an undisput$ fact2 b 9 !m x appe>s m to be ! juxtaposition ( ! male & female g5ital gl&s 9 ! same individual ?an an actual fusion ( ! two sexes1 m ! co-exi/5ce ( ! two extremes ?an a q neutral condition4 ,9 ! case ( human be+s1 h[ev]1 x appe>s to be psy*ologically true t an individual1 at lea/ at "o & ! same mom5t1 is always ei!r man or woman4 ,?is is 9 h>mony ) ! fact t ea* individual1 :e!r sup]ficially reg>d$ z male or female1 at once c recognise 8 sexual complem5t 9 ano!r individual 8woman0 or 8man40#h ,?is uni-sexuality is demon/rat$ by ! fact1 ! !oretical value ( :i* c h>dly be ov]-e/imat$1 t1 9 ! relations ( two homo-sexual m5 "o always plays ! physical & psy*ical roll ( ! man1 & 9 cases ( prolong$ int]c\rse reta9s 8 male fir/-"n1 or takes "o1 :il/ ! o!r1 :o plays ! "p ( ! woman1 ei!r assumes a woman's "n or calls himself by x1 or--& ?is is suffici5tly *>act]i/ic--receives x f ! =m]4 #h ,i once he>d a bi-sexual man exclaim1 :5 he saw a bi-sexual actress ) a slight t5d5cy to a be>d1 a deep sonor\s voice1 & v little hair on h] head1 8,!re is a f9e woman40 8,woman0 means some?+ diff]5t = e man or = e poet1 & yet x is always ! same1 ! sexual complem5t ( _! own con/itution4 ,9 ! same way1 9 ! sexual relations ( two wom51 "o always plays ! male & ! o!r ! female "p1 a fact ( deepe/ significance4 ,"h we enc\nt]1 9 a mo/ unexpect$ fa%ion1 ! fundam5tal relation%ip betwe5 ! male & female elem5ts4 ,9 spite ( all sexually int]m$iate conditions1 human be+s are always "o ( two ?+s1 ei!r male or female4 ,!re is a deep tru? und]ly+ ! old empirical sexual duality1 & ?is mu/ n be neglect$1 ev5 al?\gh 9 concrete cases !re is n a necess>y h>mony 9 ! anatomical & morphological conditions4 ,to realise ?is is to make a great /ep =w>d & to advance t[>ds mo/ important results4 ,9 ?is way we rea* a conception ( a real 8be+40 ,! task ( ! re/ ( ?is book is to set =? ! significance ( ?is 8exi/5ce40 ,z1 h[ev]1 ?is exi/5ce is b\nd up ) ! mo/ difficult side ( *>act]ology1 x w be well1 be=e sett+ out on our adv5tur\s task1 to attempt "s prelim9>y ori5tation4 ,! ob/acles 9 ! way ( *>act]ological inve/igation are v great1 if only on acc\nt ( ! complexity ( ! mat]ial4 ,(t5 & (t5 x happ5s t :5 ! pa? ?r\gh ! jungle appe>s to h be5 cle>$1 x is lo/ aga9 9 imp5etrable ?ickets1 & x seems impossible to recov] x4 ,b ! greate/ difficulty is t :5 ! sy/ematic me?od ( sett+ out ! complex mat]ial has be5 proce$$ ) & seems ab\t to lead to good results1 !n at once objections ( ! mo/ s]i\s k9d arise & almo/ =bid ! attempt to make types4 ,) reg>d to ! diff]5ces betwe5 ! sexes1 = in/ance1 ! mo/ useful !ory t has be5 put =w>d is ! exi/5ce ( a k9d ( pol>ity1 two extremes sep>at$ by a multitude ( int]m$iate conditions4 ,! *>act]ological diff]5ces appe> to foll[ ?is rule 9 a fa%ion n dissimil> to ! sugge/ion ( ! ,py?agorean1 ,alcmon ( ,kroton1 & recall+ ! rec5t *emical resurrection ( ,s*ell+'s 8,natur-philosophie40 ,b ev5 if we are able to det]m9e ! exact po9t occupi$ by an individual on ! l9e betwe5 two extremes1 & multiply ?is det]m9ation by discov]+ x = a great _m *>act]s1 w\ld ?is complex sy/em ( co-ord9ate l9es really give u a conception ( ! individual8 ,w\ld x n be a relapse to ! dogmatic scepticism ( ,ma* & ,hume1 7 we to expect t an analysis c\ld be a full description ( ! human individual8 ,& 9 a fa%ion x w\ld be a sort ( ,weismanni/ic doctr9e ( p>ticulate det]m9ants1 a mosaic psy*ology4 ,?is br+s u 9 a new way directly aga9/ ! old1 ov]-ripe problem4 ,is !re 9 a man a s+le & simple exi/5ce1 &1 if s1 9 :at relation does t /& to ! complex psy*ical ph5om5a8 ,has man1 inde$1 a s\l8 ,x is easy to und]/& :y !re has nev] be5 a sci5ce ( "*4 ,! object ( su* a sci5ce1 ! "* itself1 is problematical4 ,! problem ( all metaphysics & !ories ( k1 ! fundam5tal problem ( psy*ology1 is also ! problem ( *>act]ology4 ,at ! lea/1 *>act]ology w h to take into acc\nt ! !ory ( k itself ) reg>d to its po/ulates1 claims1 & objects1 & w h to attempt to obta9 in=mation z to all ! diff]5ces 9 ! nature ( m54 ,?is unlimit$ sci5ce ( "* w be some?+ m ?an ! 8psy*ology ( individual diff]5ces10 ! r5ew$ insi/5ce ^u :i* z a goal ( sci5ce we owe to ,l4 ,william ,/]n2 x w be m ?an a sort ( polity ( ! motor & s5sory reactions ( ! individual1 & 9 s f> w n s9k s l[ z ! usual 8results0 ( ! mod]n exp]im5tal psy*ologi/s1 :i*1 inde$1 are little m ?an /ati/ics ( physical exp]im5ts4 ,x w hope to reta9 "s k9d ( contact ) ! actualities ( ! s\l :i* ! mod]n s*ool ( psy*ology seems to h =gott51 & w n h to fe> t x w h to (f] to ard5t /ud5ts ( psy*ology no m ?an pr(\nd /udies ( words ( "o syllable1 or ( ! results on ! m9d ( small doses ( caffe94 ,x is a lam5table te/imony to ! insuffici5cy ( mod]n psy*ology t di/+ui%$ m5 ( sci5ce1 :o h n be5 cont5t ) ! /udy ( p]ception & association1 h yet _h to h& ov] to poetry ! explanation ( su* fundam5tal facts z h]oism & self-sacrifice4 ,no sci5ce w become %all[ s quickly z psy*ology if x des]ts philosophy4 ,its sep>ation f philosophy is ! true cause ( its impot5cy4 ,psy*ology w h to discov] t ! doctr9e ( s5sations is practically useless to x4 ,! empirical psy*ologi/s ( to-day1 9 _! se>* = ! developm5t ( "*1 beg9 ) inve/igation ( t\* & ! common s5sations4 ,b ! analysis ( s5sations is simply a "p ( ! physiology ( s5se1 & any attempt to br+ x into relation ) ! real problems ( psy*ology mu/ fail4 ,x is a mis=tune ( ! sci5tific psy*ology ( ! day t x has be5 influ5c$ s deeply by two physici/s1 ,fe*n] & von ,helmholtz1 ) ! result t x has fail$ to recognise t only ! ext]nal & n ! int]nal _w c be recon/ruct$ f s5sations4 ,! two mo/ intellig5t ( ! empirical psy*ologi/s ( rec5t times1 ,william ,james & ,r4 ,av5>ius1 h felt almo/ in/9ctively t psy*ology _c really re/ ^u s5sations ( ! sk9 & muscles1 al?\gh1 inde$1 all mod]n psy*ology does dep5d ^u /udy ( s5sations4 ,dil!y did n lay en\gh /ress on 8 argum5t t exi/+ psy*ology does no?+ t[>ds problems t are em95tly psy*ological1 su* z murd]1 fri5d%ip1 lonel9ess1 & s =?4 ,if any?+ is to be ga9$ 9 ! future !re mu/ be a dem& = a really psy*ological psy*ology1 & its fir/ battle-cry mu/ be3 8,away ) ! /udy ( s5sations40 ,9 attempt+ ! broad & deep *>act]ology t ,i h indicat$1 ,i mu/ set out ) a conception ( "* itself z a unit exi/5ce4 ,z 9 ! fif? *apt] ( ,"p ,i41 ,i tri$ to %[ t beh9d ! fleet+ physiological *anges !re is a p]man5t morphological =m1 s 9 *>act]ology we mu/ seek ! p]man5t1 exi/+ some?+ ?r\gh ! fleet+ *anges4 ,! "*1 h[ev]1 is n some?+ seat$ beh9d ! ?\ghts & feel+s ( ! individual1 b some?+ reveal+ itself 9 e ?\ght & feel+4 8,all t a man does is physiognomical ( him40 ,j z e cell be>s )9 x ! *>act]s ( ! :ole individual1 s e psy*ical manife/ation ( a man involves n m]ely a few little *>act]i/ic traits1 b 8 :ole be+1 ( :i* at "o mom5t "o quality1 at ano!r mom5t ano!r quality1 comes into prom95ce4 ,j z no s5sation is ev] isolat$1 b is set 9 a complete field ( s5sation1 ! _w ( ! ,ego1 ( :i* n[ "o "p & n[ ! o!r1 /&s out m pla9ly1 s ! :ole man is manife/ 9 e mom5t ( ! psy*ical life1 al?\gh1 n[ "o side1 n[ ! o!r1 is m visible4 ,?is exi/5ce1 manife/ 9 e mom5t ( ! psy*ical life1 is ! object ( *>act]ology4 ,by accept+ ?is1 !re w be complet$ = ! fir/ "t a real psy*ology1 exi/+ psy*ology1 9 manife/ contradiction ( ! mean+ ( ! ^w1 hav+ conc]n$ itself almo/ entirely ) ! motley _w1 ! *ang+ field ( s5sations1 & ov]look$ ! rul+ =ce ( ! ,ego4 ,! new psy*ology w\ld be a doctr9e ( ! :ole1 & w\ld become fre% & f]tile inasmu* z x w\ld comb9e ! complexity ( ! subject & ( ! object1 two sph]es :i* c be sep>at$ only 9 ab/raction4 ,_m disput$ po9ts ( psy*ology 7p]haps ! mo/ important7 w\ld be settl$ by an application ( su* *>act]ology1 z t w\ld expla9 :y s _m diff]5t views h be5 held on ! same subject4 ,! same psy*ical process appe>s f "t to "t 9 diff]5t aspects1 m]ely because x takes tone & col\r+ f ! individual "*4 ,& s x well may be t ! doctr9e ( diff]5tial psy*ology may receive its completion 9 ! doma9 ( g5]al psy*ology4 ,! confusion ( *>act]ology ) ! doctr9e ( ! s\l has be5 a great mis=tune1 b because ?is has occurr$ 9 actual hi/ory1 is no reason :y x %\ld cont9ue4 ,! absolute sceptic diff]s only 9 a ^w f ! absolute dogmati/4 ,! man :o dogmatically accepts ! position ( absolute ph5om5alism1 believ+ x to relieve him ( all ! burd5 ( pro( t ! m]e ent]+ on ano!r /&po9t w\ld itself entail1 w be ready to dismiss )\t pro( ! exi/5ce :i* *>act]ology posits1 & :i* has no?+ to d ) a metaphysical 8ess5ce40 ,*>act]ology has to def5d itself aga9/ two great enemies4 ,! "o assumes t "* is some?+ ultimate1 & z little ! subject-matt] ( sci5ce z is ! art ( a pa9t]4 ,! o!r looks on ! s5sations z ! only realities1 on s5sation z ! gr\nd-"w ( ! _w ( ! ,ego1 & d5ies ! exi/5ce ( "*4 ,:at is left = *>act]ology1 ! sci5ce ( "*8 ,on ! "o h&1 !re are ^? :o cry1 8,de individuo nulla sci5tia10 & 8,individuum e/ ineffabile02 on ! o!r h&1 !re are ^? sworn to sci5ce1 :o ma9ta9 t sci5ce has no?+ to d ) "*4 ,9 su* a cross-fire1 *>act]ology has to take its place1 & x may well be fe>$ t x may %>e ! fate ( its si/]s & rema9 a trivial subject l physiognomy or a div9]'s art l graphology4 ,,*apt] ,,ii ,,male ,,& ,,female ,,sexuality 8,woman does n betray h] secret40 ,,kant4 8,f a woman y c le>n no?+ ( wom540 ,,nietzs*e4 ,by psy*ology1 z a :ole1 we g5]ally und]/& ! psy*ology ( ! psy*ologi/s1 & ^! are exclusively m56 ,nev] s9ce human hi/ory began h we he>d ( a female psy*ology6 ,none ! less ! psy*ology ( woman con/itutes a *apt] z important ) reg>d to g5]al psy*ology z t ( ! *ild4 ,& inasmu* z ! psy*ology ( man has always be5 writt5 ) unconsci\s b def9ite ref]5ce to man1 g5]al psy*ology has become simply ! psy*ology ( m51 & ! problem ( ! psy*ology ( ! sexes w be rais$ z soon z ! exi/5ce ( a sep>ate psy*ology ( wom5 has be5 realis$4 ,kant said t 9 an?ropology ! peculi>ities ( ! female 7 m a /udy = ! philosoph] ?an ^? ( ! male1 & x may be t ! psy*ology ( ! sexes w disappe> 9 a psy*ology ( ! female4 ,none ! less ! psy*ology ( wom5 w h to be writt5 by m54 ,x is easy to sugge/ t su* an attempt is =$oom$ to failure1 inasmu* z ! conclusions mu/ be drawn f an ali5 sex & _c be v]ifi$ by introspection4 ,grant$ ! possibility t woman c\ld describe h]self ) suffici5t exactness1 x by no means foll[s t %e w\ld be int]e/$ 9 ! sides ( h] "* t w\ld int]e/ u4 ,moreov]1 ev5 if %e c\ld & w\ld explore h]self fully1 x is d\btful if %e c\ld br+ h]self to talk ab\t h]self4 ,i %all %[ t ^! ?ree improbabilities spr+ f ! same s\rce 9 ! nature ( woman4 ,?is inve/igation1 !re=e1 lays itself op5 to ! *>ge t no "o :o is n female c be 9 a position to make accurate /atem5ts ab\t wom54 ,9 ! meantime ! objection mu/ /&1 al?\gh1 lat]1 ,i %all h m to say ( x4 ,i w say only ?is mu*--up to n[1 & is ?is only a consequ5ce ( man's suppression8--we h no acc\nt f a pregnant woman ( h] s5sations & feel+s1 nei!r 9 poetry nor 9 memoirs1 nor ev5 9 a gyncological treatise4 ,?is _c be on acc\nt ( excessive mode/y1 =1 z ,s*op5hau] rightly po9t$ out1 !re is no?+ s f> remov$ f a pregnant woman z %ame z to h] condition4 ,besides1 !re w\ld /ill rema9 to !m ! possibility (1 aft] ! bir?1 confess+ f memory ! psy*ical life dur+ ! "t2 if a s5se ( %ame _h prev5t$ !m f su* communication dur+ ! "t1 x w\ld be gone aft]w>ds1 & ! v>i$ int]e/s ( su* a disclosure ought to h induc$ "s "o to break sil5ce4 ,b ?is has n be5 done4 ,j z we h always be5 indebt$ to m5 = really tru/wor?y expositions ( ! psy*ical side ( wom51 s also x is to m5 t we owe descriptions ( ! s5sations ( pregnant wom54 ,:at is ! mean+ ( ?is8 ,al?\gh 9 rec5t times we h _h revelations ( ! psy*ical life ( half-wom5 & ?ree-qu>t] wom51 x is practically only ab\t ! male side ( !m t !y h writt54 ,we h really only "o clue2 we h to rely ^u ! female elem5t 9 m54 ,! pr9ciple ( sexually int]m$iate =ms is ! au?ority = :at we "k ab\t wom5 ?r\gh m54 ,i %all def9e & complete ! application ( ?is pr9ciple lat] on4 ,9 its indef9ite =m1 ! pr9ciple w\ld seem to imply t ! mo/ womani% man w\ld be be/ able to describe woman1 & t ! description might be complet$ by ! real woman4 ,?is1 h[ev]1 is extremely d\btful4 ,i mu/ po9t out t a man c h a consid]able proportion ( femal5ess 9 him )\t necess>ily1 to ! same ext5t1 be+ able to portray int]m$iate =ms4 ,x is ! m rem>kable t ! male c give a fai?ful acc\nt ( ! nature ( ! female2 s9ce1 inde$1 x mu/ be admitt$ f ! extreme mal5ess ( successful portray]s ( wom5 t we _c dispute ! exi/5ce ( ?is capacity 9 ! ab/ract male2 ?is p[] ( ! male ov] ! female is a mo/ rem>kable problem1 & we %all h to consid] x lat]4 ,= ! pres5t we mu/ take x z a fact1 & proce$ to inquire 9 :at lies ! actual psy*ological diff]5ce betwe5 male & female4 ,x has be5 s\ght to attribute ! fundam5tal diff]5ce ( ! sexes to ! exi/5ce ( a /rong] sexual impulse 9 man1 & to d]ive ev]y?+ else f t4 ,ap>t f ! "q z to :e!r ! phrase 8sexual in/9ct0 d5otes a simple & real ?+1 x is to be d\bt$ if !re is pro( ( su* a diff]5ce4 ,x is n m probable ?an ! anci5t !ories z to ! influ5ce ( ! 8unsatisfi$ womb0 9 ! female1 or ( ! 8sem5 ret5tum0 9 m51 & we h to be on gu>d aga9/ ! curr5t t5d5cy to ref] ne>ly ev]y?+ to sublimat$ sexual in/9ct4 ,no sy/ematic !ory c\ld be f\nd$ on a g5]alisation s vague4 ,x is mo/ improbable t ! great] or less] /r5g? ( ! sexual impulse det]m9es o!r qualities4 ,z a matt] ( fact1 ! /atem5ts t m5 h /rong] sexual impulses ?an wom51 or t wom5 h !m /rong] ?an m51 are false4 ,! /r5g? ( ! sexual impulse 9 a man does n dep5d ^u ! proportion ( mascul9ity 9 8 composition1 & 9 ! same way ! degree ( fem99ity ( a woman does n det]m9e h] sexual impulse4 ,^! diff]5ces 9 mank9d /ill await classification4 ,contr>y to ! g5]al op9ion1 !re is no diff]5ce 9 ! total sexual impulses ( ! sexes4 ,h[ev]1 if we exam9e ! matt] 9 respect to ! two compon5t =ces into :i* ,alb]t ,moll analys$ ! impulse1 we %all f9d t a diff]5ce does exi/4 ,^! =ces may be t]m$ ! 8lib]at+0 & ! 8unit+0 impulses4 ,! fir/ appe>s 9 ! =m ( ! discom=t caus$ by ! accumulation ( ripe sexual cells2 ! second is ! desire ( ! ripe individual = sexual completion4 ,bo? impulses are possess$ by ! male2 9 ! female only ! latt] is pres5t4 ,! anatomy & ! physiological processes ( ! sexes be> out ! di/9ction4 ,9 ?is connection x may be not$ t only ! mo/ male y\?s are addict$ to ma/urbation1 & al?\gh x is (t5 disput$1 ,i believe t simil> vices occur only among ! mal] ( wom51 & are abs5t f ! female nature4 ,i mu/ n[ discuss ! 8unit+0 impulse ( woman1 = t plays ! *ief1 if n ! sole "p 9 h] sexuality4 ,b x mu/ n be suppos$ t ?is is great] 9 "o sex ?an ! o!r4 ,any su* idea comes f a confusion betwe5 ! desire = a ?+ & ! /imulus t[>ds ! active "p 9 secur+ :at is desir$4 ,?r\gh\t ! animal & plant k+doms1 ! male reproductive cells are ! motile1 active ag5ts1 :i* move ?r\gh space to seek out ! passive female cells1 & ?is physiological diff]5ce is sometimes confus$ ) ! actual wi% =1 or /imulus to1 sexual union4 ,& to add to ! confusion1 x happ5s1 9 ! animal k+dom p>ticul>ly1 t ! male1 9 addition to ! directly sexual /imulus1 has ! in/9ct to pursue & bodily capture ! female1 :il/ ! latt] has only ! passive "p to be tak5 possession (4 ,^! diff]5ces ( habit mu/ n be mi/ak5 = real diff]5ces ( desire4 ,x c be %[n1 moreov]1 t woman is sexually mu* m excitable 7n m s5sitive7 physiologically ?an man4 ,! condition ( sexual excitem5t is ! supreme mom5t ( a woman's life4 ,! woman is devot$ :olly to sexual matt]s1 t is to say1 to ! sph]es ( begett+ & ( reproduction4 ,h] relations to h] husb& & *ildr5 complete h] life1 :]eas ! male is some?+ m ?an sexual4 ,9 ?is respect1 r ?an 9 ! relative /r5g? ( ! sexual impulses1 !re is a real diff]5ce betwe5 ! sexes4 ,x is important to di/+ui% betwe5 ! int5sity ) :i* sexual matt]s are pursu$ & ! proportion ( ! total activities ( life t are devot$ to !m & to _! accessory c>es4 ,! great] absorption ( ! human female by ! sph]e ( sexual activities is ! mo/ significant diff]5ce betwe5 ! sexes4 ,! female1 moreov]1 is completely occupi$ & cont5t ) sexual matt]s1 :il/ ! male is int]e/$ 9 mu* else1 9 w> & sport1 9 social affairs & fea/+1 9 philosophy & sci5ce1 9 bus9ess & politics1 9 religion & art4 ,i d n mean to imply t ?is diff]5ce has always exi/$1 z ,i d n ?9k t important4 ,z 9 ! case ( ! ,jewi% "q1 x may be said t ! ,jews h _! pres5t "* because x has be5 =c$ ^u !m1 & t at "o "t !y 7 diff]5t4 ,x is n[ impossible to prove ?is1 & we may leave x to ^? :o believe 9 ! modification by ! environm5t to accept x4 ,! hi/orical evid5ce is equivocal on ! po9t4 ,9 ! "q ( wom51 we h to take p z !y exi/ to-day4 ,if1 h[ev]1 we happ5 to come on attributes t c\ld n possibly h be5 graft$ on !m f )\t1 we may believe t su* h always be5 ) !m4 ,( contempor>y wom5 at lea/ "o ?+ is c]ta94 ,ap>t f an exception to be not$ 9 *ap4 xii41 x is c]ta9 t :5 ! female occupies h]self ) matt]s outside ! int]e/s ( sex1 x is = ! man t %e loves or by :om %e wi%es to be lov$4 ,%e takes no real int]e/ 9 ! ?+s = !mselves4 ,x may happ5 t a real female le>ns ,lat92 if s1 x is = "s su* purpose z to help h] son :o is at s*ool4 ,desire = a subject & ability = x1 int]e/ 9 x1 & ! facility = acquir+ x1 are usually proportional4 ,he :o has slight muscles has no desire to wield an axe2 ^? )\t ! faculty = ma!matics d n desire to /udy t subject4 ,tal5t seems to be r>e & feeble 9 ! real female 7al?\gh possibly x is m]ely t ! dom9ant sexuality prev5ts its developm5t71 ) ! result t woman has no p[] ( =m+ ! comb9ations :i*1 al?\gh !y d n actually make ! individuality1 c]ta9ly %ape x4 ,correspond+ to true wom51 !re are extremely female m5 :o are to be f\nd always 9 ! ap>tm5ts ( ! wom51 & :o are int]e/$ 9 no?+ b love & sexual matt]s4 ,su* m51 h[ev]1 are n ! ,don ,juans4 ,! female pr9ciple is1 !n1 no?+ m ?an sexuality2 ! male pr9ciple is sexual & some?+ m4 ,?is diff]5ce is notable 9 ! diff]5t way 9 :i* m5 & wom5 ent] ! p]iod ( pub]ty4 ,9 ! case ( ! male ! onset ( pub]ty is a crisis2 he feels t some?+ new & /range has come into 8 be+1 t some?+ has be5 add$ to 8 p[]s & feel+s indep5d5tly ( 8 w4 ,! physiological /imulus to sexual activity appe>s to come f outside 8 be+1 to be indep5d5t ( 8 w1 & _m m5 rememb] ! di/urb+ ev5t ?r\gh\t _! aft] lives4 ,! woman1 on ! o!r h&1 n only is n di/urb$ by ! onset ( pub]ty1 b feels t h] importance has be5 increas$ by x4 ,! male1 z a y\?1 has no long+ = ! onset ( sexual maturity2 ! female1 f ! "t :5 %e is /ill q a "y girl1 looks =w>d to t "t z "o f :i* ev]y?+ is to be expect$4 ,man's arrival at maturity is frequ5tly accompani$ by feel+s ( repulsion & disgu/2 ! "y female wat*es ! developm5t ( h] body at ! approa* ( pub]ty ) excitem5t & impati5t delight4 ,x seems z if ! onset ( pub]ty 7 a side pa? 9 ! normal developm5t ( man1 :]eas 9 ! case ( woman x is ! direct conclusion4 ,!re are few boys approa*+ pub]ty to :om ! idea t !y w\ld m>ry 79 ! g5]al s5se1 n a p>ticul> girl7 w\ld n appe> ridicul\s1 :il/ ! smalle/ girl is almo/ inv>iably excit$ & int]e/$ 9 ! "q ( h] future m>riage4 ,= su* reasons a woman assigns positive value only to h] p]iod ( maturity 9 h] own case & 9 t ( o!r wom52 9 *ildhood1 z 9 old age1 %e has no real relation to ! _w4 ,! ?\ght ( h] *ildhood is = h]1 lat] on1 only ! remembrance ( h] /upidity2 %e faces ! approa* ( old age ) dislike & abhorr5ce4 ,! only real memories ( h] *ildhood are connect$ ) sex1 & ^! fade away 9 ! int5sely great] significance ( h] maturity4 ,! passage ( a woman f virg9ity is ! great divid+ po9t ( h] life1 :il/ ! correspond+ ev5t 9 ! case ( a male has v little relation to ! c\rse ( 8 life4 ,woman is only sexual1 man is p>tly sexual1 & ?is diff]5ce reveals itself 9 v>i\s ways4 ,! p>ts ( ! male body by /imulation ( :i* sexuality is excit$ are limit$ 9 area1 & are /rongly localis$1 :il/ 9 ! case ( ! woman1 !y are diffus$ ov] h] :ole body1 s t /imulation may take place almo/ f any "p4 ,:5 9 ! second *apt] ( ,"p ,i41 ,i expla9$ t sexuality is di/ribut$ ov] ! :ole body 9 bo? sexes1 ,i did n mean t1 !re=e1 ! s5se organs1 ?r\gh :i* ! def9ite impulses are /imulat$1 7 equally di/ribut$4 ,!re are1 c]ta9ly1 areas ( great] excitability1 ev5 9 ! case ( ! woman1 b !re is n1 z 9 ! man1 a %>p division betwe5 ! sexual areas & ! body g5]ally4 ,! morphological isolation ( ! sexual area f ! re/ ( ! body 9 ! case ( man1 may be tak5 z symbolical ( ! relation ( sex to 8 :ole nature4 ,j z !re is a contra/ betwe5 ! sexual & ! sexless p>ts ( a man's body1 s !re is a "t-*ange 9 8 sexuality4 ,! female is always sexual1 ! male is sexual only int]mitt5tly4 ,! sexual in/9ct is always active 9 woman 7z to ! app>5t exceptions to ?is sexuality ( wom51 ,i %all h to speak lat] on71 :il/ 9 man x is at re/ f "t to "t4 ,& ?us x happ5s t ! sexual impulse ( ! male is eruptive 9 "* & s appe>s /rong]4 ,! real diff]5ce betwe5 ! sexes is t 9 ! male ! desire is p]iodical1 9 ! female cont9u\s4 ,?is exclusive & p]si/+ sexuality ( ! female has important physical & psy*ical consequ5ces4 ,z ! sexuality ( ! male is an adjunct to 8 life1 x is possible = him to keep x 9 ! physiological backgr\nd1 & out ( 8 consci\sness4 ,& s a man c lay aside 8 sexuality & n h to reckon ) x4 ,a woman has n h] sexuality limit$ to p]iods ( "t1 nor to localis$ organs4 ,& s x happ5s t a man c "k ab\t 8 sexuality1 :il/ a woman is unconsci\s ( x & c 9 all good fai? d5y x1 because %e is no?+ b sexuality1 because %e is sexuality itself4 ,x is impossible = wom51 because !y are only sexual1 to recognise _! sexuality1 because recognition ( any?+ requires duality4 ,) man x is n only t he is n m]ely sexual1 b anatomically & physiologically he c 8deta*0 himself f x4 ,t is :y he has ! p[] to ent] into :atev] sexual relations he desires2 if he likes he c limit or increase su* relations2 he c refuse or ass5t to !m4 ,he c play ! "p ( a ,don ,juan or a monk4 ,he c assume :i* he w4 ,to put x bluntly1 man possesses sexual organs2 h] sexual organs possess woman4 ,we may1 !re=e1 d$uce f ! previ\s argum5ts t man has ! p[] ( consci\sness ( 8 sexuality & s c act aga9/ x1 :il/ ! woman appe>s to be )\t ?is p[]4 ,?is implies1 moreov]1 t !re is great] diff]5tiation 9 man1 z 9 him ! sexual & ! unsexual p>ts ( 8 nature are %>ply sep>at$4 ,! possibility or impossibility ( be+ aw>e ( a p>ticul> def9ite object is1 h[ev]1 h>dly a "p ( ! cu/om>y mean+ ( ! ^w consci\sness1 :i* is g5]ally us$ z imply+ t if a be+ is consci\s he c be consci\s ( any object4 ,?is br+s me to consid] ! nature ( ! female consci\sness1 & ,i mu/ take a long dt\r to consid] x4 ,,*apt] ,,iii ,,male ,,& ,,female ,,consci\sness ,be=e proce$+ to consid] ! ma9 diff]5ce betwe5 ! psy*ical life ( ! sexes1 s f> z ! latt] takes subjective & objective ?+s z its cont5ts1 a few psy*ological s\nd+s mu/ be tak51 & conceptions =mulat$4 ,z ! views & pr9ciples ( prevail+ sy/ems ( psy*ology h be5 =m$ )\t consid]ation ( ! subject ( ?is book1 x is n surpris+ t !y conta9 little t ,i am able to use4 ,at pres5t !re is no psy*ology b _m psy*ologi/s1 & x w\ld really be a matt] ( caprice on my "p to *oose any p>ticul> s*ool & attempt to apply its pr9ciples to my subject4 ,i %all r try to lay d[n a few useful pr9ciples on my own acc\nt4 ,! endeav\rs to rea* a compreh5sive & unify+ conception ( ! :ole psy*ical process by ref]r+ x to a s+le pr9ciple h be5 p>ticul>ly evid5t 9 ! relations betwe5 p]ceptions & s5sations sugge/$ by diff]5t psy*ologi/s4 ,h]b>t1 = in/ance1 d]iv$ ! s5sations f elem5t>y ideas1 :il/ ,horwicz suppos$ !m to come f p]ceptions4 ,mo/ mod]n psy*ologi/s h insi/$ t su* moni/ic attempts mu/ be fruitless4 ,none ! less !re 0 "s tru? 9 ! view4 ,to discov] ?is tru?1 h[ev]1 x is necess>y to make a di/9ction t has be5 ov]look$ by mod]n work]s4 ,we mu/ di/+ui% betwe5 ! p]ceiv+ ( a p]ception1 feel+ ( a s5sation1 ?9k+ a ?\ght f ! lat] repetitions ( ! process 9 :i* recognition plays a "p4 ,9 _m cases ?is di/9ction is ( fundam5tal importance4 ,e simple1 cle>1 pla/ic p]ception & e di/9ct idea1 be=e x c\ld be put into words1 passes ?r\gh a /age 7:i* may inde$ be v %ort7 ( indi/9ctness4 ,s also 9 ! case ( association2 = a long] or %ort] "t be=e ! elem5ts ab\t to be gr\p$ h actually come toge!r1 !re is a sort ( vague1 g5]alis$ expectation or pres5tim5t ( association4 ,leibnitz1 9 p>ticul>1 has work$ at k9dr$ processes1 & ,i believe !m to und]lie ! attempts ( ,h]b>t & ,horwicz4 ,! common acceptance ( pleasure & pa9 z ! fundam5tal s5sations1 ev5 ) ,wundt's addition ( ! s5sations ( t5sion & relaxation1 ( re/ & /imulation1 makes ! division ( psy*ical ph5om5a into s5sations & p]ceptions too n>r[ = due treatm5t ( ! vague prelim9>y /ages to :i* ,i h ref]r$4 ,i %all g back !re=e to ! wide/ classification ( psy*ical ph5om5a t ,i "k (1 t ( ,av5>ius into 8elem5ts0 & 8*>act]s40 ,! ^w 8"*0 9 ?is connection1 ( c\rse1 has no?+ to d ) ! subject ( *>act]ology4 ,av5>ius add$ to ! difficulty ( apply+ 8 !ories by 8 use ( a practically new t]m9ology 7:i* is c]ta9ly mo/ /rik+ & indisp5sable = "s ( ! new views he exp\nd$74 ,b :at /&s mo/ 9 ! way ( accept+ "s ( 8 conclusions is 8 desire to d]ive 8 psy*ology f ! physiology ( ! bra91 a physiology :i* he evolv$ himself out ( 8 inn] consci\sness ) only a slight g5]al acqua9tance ) actual biological facts4 ,! psy*ological1 or second "p ( 8 8,critique ( ,pure ,exp]i5ce10 0 really ! s\rce f :i* he d]iv$ ! fir/ or physiological "p1 ) ! result t ! latt] appe>s to its read]s z an acc\nt ( "s discov]y 9 ,atlantis4 ,because ( ^! difficulties ,i %all give "h a %ort acc\nt ( ! sy/em ( ,av5>ius1 z ,i f9d x useful = my !sis4 ,an 8,elem5t0 9 ! s5se ( ,av5>ius repres5ts :at ! usual psy*ology t]ms a p]ception1 or ! cont5t ( a p]ception1 :at ,s*op5hau] call$ a pres5tation1 :at 9 ,engl& is call$ an 8impression0 or 8idea10 ! 8?+10 8fact10 or 8object0 ( ord9>y language2 & ! ^w is us$ indep5d5tly ( ! pres5ce or abs5ce ( a special s5se-organ /imulation--a mo/ important & novel addition4 ,9 ! s5se ( ,av5>ius1 & = our purpose1 x is a matt] ( indiff]5ce to ! t]m9ology h[ f> :at is call$ 8analysis0 takes place1 ! :ole tree may be tak5 z ! 8elem5t10 or ea* s+le leaf1 or ea* hair1 or 7:]e mo/ p w\ld /op71 ! col\rs1 sizes1 weights1 temp]atures1 resi/ances1 & s =?4 ,/ill1 ! analysis may g yet fur!r1 & ! col\r ( ! leaf may be tak5 z m]ely ! resultant ( its quality1 int5sity1 lum9osity1 & s =?1 ^! be+ ! elem5ts4 ,or we may g /ill fur!r & take mod]n ultimate conceptions rea*+ units incapable ( sub-division4 ,9 ! s5se ( ,av5>ius1 !n1 elem5ts are su* ideas z 8gre510 8blue10 8cold10 8w>m10 8s(t10 8h>d10 8sweet10 8bitt]10 & _! 8"*0 is ! p>ticul> k9d ( quality ) :i* !y appe>1 n m]ely _! pleasantness or unpleasantness1 b also su* modes ( pres5tation z 8surpris+10 8expect$10 8novel10 8indiff]5t10 8recognis$10 8kn[n10 8actual10 8d\btful10 categories :i* ,av5>ius fir/ recognis$ z be+ psy*ological4 ,= in/ance1 :at ,i guess1 believe1 or "k is an 8elem5t02 ! fact t ,i guess x1 n believe x or "k x1 is ! 8"*0 9 :i* x pres5ts itself psy*ologically 7n logically74 ,n[ !re is a /age 9 m5tal activity 9 :i* ?is sub-division ( psy*ical ph5om5a _c be made1 :i* is too e>ly = x4 ,all 8elem5ts0 at _! fir/ appe>ance are m]g$ ) ! float+ backgr\nd1 ! :ole be+ vaguely t+$ by 8"*40 ,to foll[ my mean+1 ?9k ( :at takes place1 :5 = ! fir/ "t at a di/ance "o sees some?+ 9 ! l&scape1 su* z a %rub or a heap ( wood1 at ! mom5t :5 "o does n yet "k :at 8x0 is4 ,at ?is mom5t 8elem5t0 & 8"*0 are absolutely indi/+ui%able 7!y are always insep>able z ,petzoldt +5i\sly po9t$ out71 s improv+ ! orig9al /atem5t ( ,av5>ius4 ,9 a d5se cr[d ,i p]ceive1 = in/ance1 a face :i* attracts me across ! sway+ mass by its expression4 ,i h no idea :at ! face is l1 & %\ld be q unable to describe x or give an idea ( x2 b x has appeal$ to me 9 ! mo/ di/urb+ mann]1 & ,i f9d myself ask+ ) ke5 curiosity1 8,:]e h ,i se5 t face be=e80 ,a man may see ! head ( a woman = a mom5t1 & ?is may make a v /rong impression on him1 & yet he may be unable to say exactly :at he has se51 or1 = in/ance1 be able to rememb] ! col\r ( h] hair4 ,! ret9a mu/ be expos$ to ! object suffici5tly long1 if only a fraction ( a second1 = a photographic impression to be made4 ,if "o looks at any object f a consid]able di/ance "o has at fir/ only ! vague/ impression ( its outl9es2 & z "o comes ne>] & sees ! details m cle>ly1 lively s5sations1 at fir/ lo/ 9 ! g5]al mass1 are receiv$4 ,?9k1 = in/ance1 ( ! fir/ g5]al impression (1 say1 ! sph5oid bone dis>ticulat$ f a skull1 or ( _m pictures se5 a little too closely or a little too f> away4 ,i myself h a remembrance ( hav+ _h /rong impressions f sonatas ( ,bee?ov5 be=e ,i knew any?+ ( ! musical notes4 ,av5>ius & ,petzoldt h ov]look$ ! fact t ! com+ into consci\sness ( ! elem5ts is accompani$ by a k9d ( secretion ( *>act]isation4 ,"s ( ! simple exp]im5ts ( physiological psy*ology illu/rate ! po9t to :i* ,i h be5 ref]r+4 ,if "o /ays 9 a d>k room until ! eye has adapt$ itself to ! abs5ce ( light1 & !n = a second subjects oneself to a ray ( col\r$ light1 a s5sation ( illum9ation w be receiv$1 al?\gh x is impossible to recognise ! quality ( ! illum9ation2 some?+ has be5 p]ceiv$1 b :at ! some?+ is _c be appreh5d$ unless ! /imulation la/s a def9ite "t4 ,9 ! same way e sci5tific discov]y1 e te*nical inv5tion1 e arti/ic creation passes ?r\gh a prelim9>y phase ( indi/9ctness4 ,! process is simil> to ! s]ies ( impressions t w\ld be got z a /atue 0 gradually unwrapp$ f a s]ies ( swa?+s4 ,! same k9d ( sequ5ce occurs1 al?\gh1 p]haps1 9 a v brief space ( "t1 :5 "o is try+ to recall a piece ( music4 ,e ?\ght is prec$$ by a k9d ( half-?\ght1 a condition 9 :i* vague geometrical figures1 %ift+ masks1 a sway+ & indi/9ct backgr\nd hov] 9 ! m9d4 ,! beg9n+ & ! end ( ! :ole process1 :i* ,i may t]m 8cl>ification10 are :at take place :5 a %ort-sight$ p]son proce$s to look ?r\gh prop]ly adapt$ l5ses4 ,j z ?is process occurs 9 ! life ( ! individual 7& he1 inde$1 may die long be=e x is complete71 s x occurs 9 hi/ory4 ,def9ite sci5tific conceptions are prec$$ by anticipations4 ,! process ( cl>ification is spread ov] _m g5]ations4 ,!re 7 anci5t & mod]n vague anticipations ( ! !ory ( ,d>w9 & ,lam>ck1 anticipations :i* we are n[ apt to ov]value4 ,may] & ,helmholtz _h _! pr$ecessors1 & ,goe! & ,leon>do da ,v9ci1 p]haps two ( ! mo/ _m-sid$ intellects kn[n to u1 anticipat$ 9 a vague way _m ( ! conclusions ( mod]n sci5ce4 ,! :ole hi/ory ( ?\ght is a cont9u\s 8cl>ification10 a m & m accurate description or realisation ( details4 ,! enorm\s numb] ( /ages betwe5 light & d>kness1 ! m9ute gradations ( detail t foll[ ea* o!r 9 ! developm5t ( ?\ght c be realis$ be/ if "o foll[s hi/orically "s complicat$ mod]n piece ( k1 su* z1 = in/ance1 ! !ory ( elliptical functions4 ,! process ( cl>ification may be rev]s$1 & ! act ( =gett+ is su* a rev]sal4 ,?is may take a consid]able "t1 & is usually notic$ only by accid5t at "s po9t or o!r ( its c\rse4 ,! process is simil> to ! gradual oblit]ation ( well-made roads1 = ! ma9t5ance ( :i* no provision has be5 made4 ,! fa9t anticipations ( a ?\ght are v l ! fa9t recollections ( x1 & ! latt] gradually become blurr$ z 9 ! case ( a neglect$ road ov] ! b\nd>ies ( :i* animals /ray1 sl[ly oblit]at+ x4 ,9 ?is connection a practical rule = memoris+1 discov]$ & appli$ by a fri5d ( m9e1 is int]e/+4 ,x g5]ally happ5s t if "o wants to le>n1 say1 a piece ( music1 or a section f ! hi/ory ( philosophy1 "o has to g ov] p>ts ( x aga9 & aga94 ,! problem 01 h[ long %\ld ! int]vals be betwe5 ^! successive attempts to commit to memory8 ,! answ] 0 t !y %\ld n be s long z to make x possible to take a fre% int]e/ 9 ! subject aga91 to be int]e/$ & curi\s ab\t x4 ,if ! int]val has produc$ t /ate ( m9d1 !n ! process ( cl>ification mu/ beg9 f ! beg9n+ aga94 ,! r popul> physiological !ory ( ,sigismund ,exn] z to ! =mation ( 8pa?s0 9 ! n]v\s sy/em may p]haps be tak5 z a physical p>allel ( ! process ( cl>ification4 ,accord+ to ! !ory1 ! n]ves1 or r ! fibrils1 make pa?s easy = ! /imulations to travel along1 if ^! /imulations la/ suffici5tly long or are repeat$ suffici5tly (t54 ,s also 9 ! case ( =gett+2 :at happ5s is t ^! pa?s or processes ( ! n]ve-cells atrophy f disuse4 ,av5>ius w\ld h expla9$ ! above processes by 8 !ory ( ! articulation ( ! fibres ( ! bra91 b 8 physical doctr9e 0 r too crude & too simple = application to psy*o-physics4 ,none ! less 8 conception ( articulation or jo9t+ is bo? conv5i5t & appropriate 9 its application to ! process ( cl>ification1 & ,i %all employ x 9 t connection4 ,! process ( cl>ification mu/ be trac$ ?or\ghly 9 ord] to realise its importance1 b = ! mom5t1 x is important to consid] only ! initial /age4 ,! di/9ction ( ,av5>ius betwe5 8elem5t0 & 8"*10 :i* lat] on w become evid5t 9 a process ( cl>ification1 is n applicable to ! v e>lie/ mom5ts ( ! process4 ,x is necess>y to co9 a "n = ^? m9ds to :i* ! duality ( elem5t & "* becomes appreciable at no /age ( ! process4 ,i propose = psy*ical data at ?is e>lie/ /age ( _! exi/5ce ! ^w ,h5id 7f ! ,greek 1 because 9 !m x is impossible to di/+ui% p]ception & s5sation z two analytically sep>able factors1 & because1 !re=e1 !re is no trace ( duality 9 !m74 ,naturally ! 8h5id0 is an ab/ract conception & may n occur 9 ! absolute =m4 ,h[ (t5 psy*ical data 9 human be+s actually /& at ?is absolute extreme ( undiff]5tiation is unc]ta9 & unimportant2 b ! !ory does n ne$ to conc]n itself ) ! possibility ( su* an extreme4 ,a common example f :at has happ5$ to all ( u may s]ve to illu/rate :at a h5id is4 ,i may h a def9ite wi% to say some?+ p>ticul>1 & !n some?+ di/racts me1 & ! 8x0 ,i want$ to say or ?9k has gone4 ,lat] on1 by "s process ( association1 ! 8x0 is q sudd5ly reproduc$1 & ,i "k at once t x 0 :at 0 on my tongue1 b1 s to speak1 9 a m p]fect /age ( developm5t4 ,i fe> le/ "s "o may expect me to describe exactly :at ,i mean by 8h5id40 ,! wi% c come only f a misconception4 ,! v idea ( a h5id =bids its description2 x is m]ely a some?+4 ,lat] on id5tification w come ) ! complete articulation ( ! cont5ts ( ! h5id2 b ! h5id is n ! :ole ( ?is detail$ cont5t1 b is di/+ui%$ f x by a l[] grade ( consci\sness1 by an abs5ce (1 s to speak1 relief1 by a bl5d+ ( ! die & ! impression1 by ! abs5ce ( a c5tral po9t 9 ! field ( vision4 ,& s "o _c describe p>ticul> h5ids2 "o c only be consci\s ( _! exi/5ce4 ,none ! less h5ids are ?+s z vital z elem5ts & *>act]s4 ,ea* h5id is an individual & c be di/+ui%$ f o!r h5ids4 ,lat] on ,i %all %[ t probably ! m5tal data ( e>ly *ildhood 7c]ta9ly ( ! fir/ f\rte5 mon?s7 are all h5ids1 al?\gh p]haps n 9 ! absolute s5se4 ,?r\gh\t *ildhood ^! data d n rea* f> f ! h5id /age2 9 adults !re is always a c]ta9 process ( developm5t go+ on4 ,probably ! p]ceptions ( "s plants & animals are h5ids4 ,9 ! case ( mank9d ! developm5t f ! h5id to ! completely diff]5tiat$ p]ception & idea is always possible1 al?\gh su* an ideal condition may seldom be atta9$4 ,:il/ expression 9 words is impossible 9 ! case ( ! absolute h5id1 z words imply articulat$ ?\ghts1 !re are also 9 ! highe/ /ages ( ! intellect possible to man "s ?+s /ill uncl>ifi$ &1 !re=e1 unspeakable4 ,! !ory ( h5ids w help 9 ! old qu>rel betwe5 ! sph]es ( p]ception & s5sation1 & w replace by a developm5tal conception ! ideas ( elem5t & "* :i* ,av5>ius & ,petzoldt d$uc$ f ! process ( cl>ification4 ,x is only :5 ! elem5ts become di/9ct t !y c be di/+ui%$ f ! *>act]s4 ,man is dispos$ to hum\rs & s5tim5talities only s long z ! cont\rs ( 8 ideas are vague2 :5 he sees ?+s 9 ! light in/ead ( ! d>k 8 process ( ?9k+ w become diff]5t4 ,n[ :at is ! relation betwe5 ! inve/igation ,i h be5 mak+ & ! psy*ology ( ! sexes8 ,:at is ! di/9ction betwe5 ! male & ! female 7& to rea* ?is has be5 ! object ( my digression7 9 ! process ( cl>ification8 ,"h is my answ]3 ,! male has ! same psy*ical data z ! female1 b 9 a m articulat$ =m2 :]e %e ?9ks m or less 9 h5ids1 he ?9ks 9 m or less cle> & detail$ pres5tations 9 :i* ! elem5ts are di/9ct f ! tones ( feel+4 ,) ! woman1 ?9k+ & feel+ are id5tical1 = man !y are 9 opposition4 ,! woman has _m ( h] m5tal exp]i5ces z h5ids1 :il/ 9 man ^! h pass$ ?r\gh a process ( cl>ification4 ,woman is s5tim5tal1 & kn[s emotion b n m5tal excitem5t4 ,! great] articulation ( ! m5tal data 9 man is reflect$ 9 ! m m>k$ "* ( 8 body & face1 z comp>$ ) ! r\ndness & vagu5ess ( ! woman4 ,9 ! same connection x is to be rememb]$ t1 not)/&+ ! popul> belief1 ! s5ses ( ! male are mu* m acute ?an ^? ( ! woman4 ,! only exception is ! s5se ( t\*1 an exception ( great int]e/ to :i* ,i %all ref] lat]4 ,x has be5 e/abli%$1 moreov]1 t ! s5sibility to pa9 is mu* m acute 9 man1 & we h n[ le>n$ to di/+ui% betwe5 t & ! tactile s5sations4 ,a weak] s5sibility is likely to ret>d ! passage ( m5tal data ?r\gh ! process ( cl>ification1 al?\gh we _c q take x = grant$ t x mu/ be s4 ,p]haps a m tru/wor?y pro( ( ! less degree ( articulation 9 ! m5tal data ( ! woman may be drawn f consid]ation ( ! great] decision 9 ! judgm5ts made by m51 al?\gh inde$ x may be ! case t ?is di/9ction re/s on a deep] basis4 ,x is c]ta9ly ! case t :il/ we are /ill ne> ! h5id /age we "k mu* m c]ta9ly :at a ?+ is n ?an :at x is4 ,:at ,ma* has call$ in/9ctive exp]i5ce dep5ds on h5ids4 ,:ile we are ne> ! h5id /age we ?9k r\nd ab\t a subject1 correct ourselves at ea* new attempt1 & say t t 0 n yet ! "r ^w4 ,naturally t condition implies unc]ta9ty & indecision 9 judgm5t4 ,judgm5t comes t[>ds ! end ( ! process ( cl>ification2 ! act ( judgm5t is 9 itself a dep>ture f ! h5id /age4 ,! mo/ decisive pro( = ! correctness ( ! view t attributes h5ids to woman & diff]5tiat$ ?\ghts to man1 & t sees 9 ?is a fundam5tal sexual di/9ction1 lies 9 ! fact t :]ev] a new judgm5t is to be made1 7n m]ely some?+ already settl$ to be put into prov]bial =m7 x is always ! case t ! female expects f man ! cl>ification ( h] data1 ! int]pretation ( h] h5ids4 ,x is almo/ a t]ti>y sexual "* ( ! male1 & c]ta9ly x acts on ! female z su*1 t %e expects f him ! int]pretation & illum9ation ( h] ?\ghts4 ,x is f ?is reason t s _m girls say t !y c\ld only m>ry1 or1 at lea/1 only love a man :o 0 clev]] ?an !mselves2 t !y w\ld be repell$ by a man :o said t all !y ?\ght 0 "r1 & did n "k bett] ?an !y did4 ,9 %ort1 ! woman makes x a crit]ion ( manl9ess t ! man %\ld be sup]ior to h]self m5tally1 t %e %\ld be influ5c$ & dom9at$ by ! man2 & ?is 9 itself is en\gh to ridicule all ideas ( sexual equality4 ,! male lives consci\sly1 ! female lives unconsci\sly4 ,?is is c]ta9ly ! necess>y conclusion = ! extreme cases4 ,! woman receives h] consci\sness f ! man2 ! function to br+ into consci\sness :at 0 outside x is a sexual function ( ! typical man ) reg>d to ! typical woman1 & is a necess>y "p ( 8 ideal complet5ess4 ,& n[ we are br\ght up aga9/ ! problem ( tal5t2 ! :ole mod]n woman "q appe>s to be resolv+ itself into a dispute z to :e!r m5 or wom5 are m highly gift$4 ,z ! "q is g5]ally prop\nd$ !re is no attempt to di/+ui% betwe5 ! pure types ( sex2 ! conclusions ) reg>d to ^! t ,i h be5 able to set =? h an important be>+ on ! answ] to ! "q4 ,,*apt] ,,iv ,,tal5t ,,& ,,g5ius ,!re has be5 s mu* writt5 ab\t ! nature ( g5ius t1 to avoid misund]/&+1 x w be bett] to make a few g5]al rem>ks be=e go+ into ! subject4 ,& ! fir/ ?+ to d is to settle ! "q ( tal5t4 ,g5ius & tal5t are ne>ly always connect$ 9 ! popul> idea1 z if ! fir/ 7 a high]1 or ! highe/1 grade ( ! latt]1 & z if a man ( v high & v>i$ tal5ts might be a sort ( int]m$iate betwe5 ! two4 ,?is view is entirely errone\s4 ,ev5 if !re 7 diff]5t degrees or grades ( g5ius1 !y w\ld h absolutely no?+ to d ) s-call$ 8tal5t40 ,a tal5t1 = in/ance ! ma!matical tal5t1 may be possess$ by "s "o 9 a v high degree f bir?2 & he w be able to ma/] ! mo/ difficult problems ( t sci5ce ) ease2 b = ?is he w require no g5ius1 :i* is ! same z orig9ality1 individuality1 & a condition ( g5]al productiv5ess4 ,on ! o!r h&1 !re are m5 ( great g5ius :o h %[n no special tal5t 9 any m>k$ degree2 = in/ance1 m5 l ,novalis or ,jean ,paul4 ,g5ius is di/9ctly n ! sup]lative ( tal5t2 !re is a _w-wide diff]5ce betwe5 ! two2 !y are ( absolutely unlike nature2 !y c nei!r be measur$ by "o ano!r or comp>$ to ea* o!r4 ,tal5t is h]$it>y2 x may be ! common possession ( a :ole family 7e4g41 ! ,ba* family72 g5ius is n transmitt$2 x is nev] diffus$1 b is /rictly individual4 ,_m ill-balanc$ p1 & 9 p>ticul> wom51 reg>d g5ius & tal5t z id5tical4 ,wom51 inde$1 h n ! faculty ( appreciat+ g5ius1 al?\gh ?is is n ! common view4 ,any extravagance t di/+ui%es a man f o!r m5 appeals equally to _! sexual ambition2 !y confuse ! dramati/ ) ! actor1 & make no di/9ction betwe5 ! virtuoso & ! arti/4 ,= !m ! tal5t$ man is ! man ( g5ius1 & ,nietzs*e is ! type ( :at !y consid] g5ius4 ,:at has be5 call$ ! ,fr5* type ( ?\ght1 :i* s /rongly appeals to !m1 has no?+ to d ) ! highe/ possibilities ( ! m9d4 ,great m5 take !mselves & ! _w too s]i\sly to become :at is call$ m]ely intellectual4 ,m5 :o are m]ely intellectual are ins9c]e2 !y are p :o h nev] really be5 deeply engross$ by ?+s & :o d n feel an ov]p[]+ desire = production4 ,all t !y c>e ab\t is t _! "w %\ld glitt] & sp>kle l a well-cut /one1 n t x %\ld illum9ate any?+4 ,!y are m occupi$ ) :at w be said ( :at !y ?9k ?an by ! ?\ghts !mselves4 ,!re are m5 :o are will+ to m>ry a woman !y d n c>e ab\t m]ely because %e is admir$ by o!r m54 ,su* a relation exi/s betwe5 _m m5 & _! ?\ghts4 ,i _c help ?9k+ ( "o p>ticul> liv+ au?or1 a bl>+1 outrage\s p]son1 :o fancies t he is ro>+ :5 he is only sn>l+4 ,un=tunately1 ,nietzs*e 7h[ev] sup]ior he is to ! man ,i h 9 m9d7 seems to h devot$ himself *iefly to :at he ?\ght w\ld %ock ! public4 ,he is at 8 be/ :5 he is mo/ unm9dful ( effect4 ,8 0 ! vanity ( ! mirror1 say+ to :at x reflects1 8,see h[ fai?fully ,i %[ y y\r image40 ,9 y\? :5 a man is n yet c]ta9 ( himself he may try to secure 8 own position by jo/l+ o!rs4 ,great m51 h[ev]1 are pa9fully aggressive only f necessity4 ,!y are n l a girl :o is mo/ pleas$ ab\t a new dress because %e kn[s t x w annoy h] fri5ds4 ,g5ius6 g5ius6 h[ mu* m5tal di/urbance & discom=t1 hatr$ & envy1 jeal\sy & pett9ess1 has x n ar\s$ 9 ! majority ( m51 & h[ mu* c\nt]feit & t9sel has ! desire = x n occasion$8 ,i turn gladly f ! imitations ( g5ius to ! ?+ itself & its true embodim5t4 ,b :]e c ,i beg98 ,all ! qualities t g to make g5ius are 9 s intimate connection t to beg9 ) any "o ( !m seems to lead to premature conclusions4 ,all discussions on ! nature ( g5ius are ei!r biological-cl9ical1 & s]ve only to %[ ! absurd presumption ( pres5t k ( ?is k9d 9 its hope to solve a problem s difficult2 or !y desc5d f ! heights ( a metaphysical sy/em = ! sole purpose ( includ+ g5ius 9 _! purview4 ,if ! road t ,i am ab\t to take does n lead to e goal at once1 x is only because t is ! nature ( roads4 ,consid] h[ mu* deep] a great poet c rea* into ! nature ( man ?an an av]age p]son4 ,?9k ( ! extraord9>y numb] ( *>act]s depict$ by ,%akespe>e or ,euripides1 or ! m>vell\s assortm5t ( human be+s t fill ! pages ( ,zola4 ,aft] ! ,p5!silea1 ,he9ri* von ,klei/ creat$ ,kt*5 von ,heilbronn1 & ,mi*ael ,angelo embodi$ f 8 imag9ation ! ,delphic ,sibyls & ! ,l$a4 ,!re h be5 few m5 s little devot$ to art z ,kant & ,s*ell+1 & yet ^! h writt5 mo/ pr(\ndly & truly ab\t x4 ,9 ord] to depict a man "o mu/ und]/& him1 & to und]/& him "o mu/ be l him2 9 ord] to portray 8 psy*ological activities "o mu/ be able to reproduce !m 9 oneself4 ,to und]/& a man "o mu/ h 8 nature 9 oneself4 ,"o mu/ be l ! m9d "o tries to grasp4 ,x takes a ?ief to "k a ?ief1 & only an innoc5t man c und]/& ano!r innoc5t man4 ,! poseur only und]/&s o!r poseurs1 & sees no?+ b pose 9 ! actions ( o!rs2 :il/ ! simple-m9d$ fails to und]/& ! mo/ flagrant pose4 ,to und]/& a man is really to be t man4 ,x w\ld seem to foll[ t a man c be/ und]/& himself--a conclusion pla9ly absurd4 ,no "o c und]/& himself1 = to d t he w\ld h to get outside himself2 ! subject ( ! kn[+ & will+ activity w\ld h to become its own object4 ,to grasp ! univ]se x w\ld be necess>y to get a /&po9t outside ! univ]se1 & ! possibility ( su* a /&po9t is incompatible ) ! idea ( a univ]se4 ,he :o c\ld und]/& himself c\ld und]/& ! _w4 ,i d n make ! /atem5t m]ely z an explanation3 x conta9s an important tru?1 to ! significance ( :i* ,i %all recur4 ,= ! pres5t ,i am cont5t to ass]t t no "o c und]/& 8 deepe/1 mo/ intimate nature4 ,?is happ5s 9 actual practice2 :5 "o wi%es to und]/& 9 a g5]al way1 x is always f o!r p]sons1 nev] f oneself1 t "o gets "o's mat]ials4 ,! o!r p]son *os5 mu/ be simil> 9 "s respect1 h[ev] diff]5t z a :ole2 &1 mak+ use ( ?is simil>ity1 he c recognise1 repres5t1 compreh5d4 ,s f> z "o und]/&s a man1 "o is t man4 ,! man ( g5ius takes 8 place 9 ! above argum5t z he :o und]/&s incomp>ably m o!r be+s ?an ! av]age man4 ,goe! is said to h said ( himself t !re 0 no vice or crime ( :i* he c\ld n trace ! t5d5cy 9 himself1 & t at "s p]iod ( 8 life he c\ld n h und]/ood fully4 ,! g5ius1 !re=e1 is a m complicat$1 m ri*ly end[$1 m v>i$ man2 & a man is ! clos] to be+ a g5ius ! m m5 he has 9 8 p]sonality1 & ! m really & /rongly he has ^! o!rs )9 him4 ,if compreh5sion ( ^? ab\t him only flick]s 9 him l a poor c&le1 !n he is unable1 l ! great poet1 to k9dle a mighty flame 9 8 h]oes1 to give di/9ction & "* to 8 creations4 ,! ideal ( an arti/ic g5ius is to live 9 all m51 to lose himself 9 all m51 to reveal himself 9 multitudes2 & s also ! aim ( ! philosoph] is to discov] all o!rs 9 himself1 to fuse !m into a unit :i* is 8 own unit4 ,?is protean "* ( g5ius is no m simultane\s ?an ! bi-sexuality ( :i* ,i h spok54 ,ev5 ! greate/ g5ius _c und]/& ! nature ( all m5 at ! same "t1 on "o & ! same day4 ,! compreh5sive & manifold rudim5ts :i* a man possesses 9 8 m9d c develop only sl[ly & by degrees ) ! gradual unfold+ ( 8 :ole life4 ,x appe>s almo/ z if !re 7 a def9ite p]iodicity 9 8 developm5t4 ,^! p]iods1 :5 !y recur1 h[ev]1 are n exactly alike2 !y are n m]e repetitions1 b are int5sifications ( _! pr$ecessors1 on a high] plane4 ,no two mom5ts 9 ! life ( an individual are exactly alike2 !re is betwe5 ! lat] & ! e>li] p]iods only ! simil>ity ( ! high] & l[] p>ts ( a spiral asc5t4 ,?us x has frequ5tly happ5$ t fam\s m5 h conceiv$ a piece ( "w 9 _! e>ly y\?1 laid x aside dur+ manhood1 & resum$ & complet$ x 9 old age4 ,p]iods exi/ 9 e man1 b 9 diff]5t degrees & ) v>y+ 8amplitude40 ,j z ! g5ius is ! man :o conta9s 9 himself ! greate/ numb] ( o!rs 9 ! mo/ active way1 s ! amplitude ( a man's p]iods w be ! great] ! wid] 8 m5tal relations may be4 ,illu/ri\s m5 h (t5 be5 told1 by _! tea*]s1 9 _! y\? 8t !y 7 always 9 "o extreme or ano!r40 ,z if !y c\ld be any?+ else6 ,^! transitions 9 ! case ( unusual m5 (t5 assume ! "* ( a crisis4 ,goe! once spoke ( ! 8recurr5ce ( pub]ty0 9 an arti/4 ,! idea is obvi\sly to be associat$ ) ! matt] "u discussion4 ,x results f _! p]iodicity t1 9 m5 ( g5ius1 /]ile ye>s prec$e productive ye>s1 ^! aga9 to be foll[$ by /]ility1 ! b>r5 p]iods be+ m>k$ by psy*ological self-depreciation1 by ! feel+ t !y are less ?an o!r m52 times 9 :i* ! remembrance ( ! creative p]iods is a torm5t1 & :5 !y envy ^? :o g ab\t undi/urb$ by su* p5alties4 ,j z 8 mom5ts ( ec/asy are m poignant1 s are ! p]iods ( depression ( a man ( g5ius m int5se ?an ^? ( o!r m54 ,e great man has su* p]iods1 ( long] or %ort] duration1 times 9 :i* he loses self-confid5ce1 9 :i* he ?9ks ( suicide2 times 9 :i*1 inde$1 he may be s[+ ! se$s ( a future h>ve/1 b :i* are devoid ( ! /imulus to production2 times :i* call =? ! bl9d criticisms 8,h[ su* a g5ius is deg5]at+60 8,h[ he has play$ himself out60 8,h[ he repeats himself60 & s =?4 ,x is j ! same ) o!r *>act]i/ics ( ! man ( g5ius4 ,n only ! mat]ial1 b also ! _s1 ( 8 "w is subject to p]iodic *ange4 ,at "o "t he is incl9$ to a philosophical & sci5tific view2 at ano!r "t ! arti/ic influ5ce is /ronge/2 at "o "t 8 int]vals are altoge!r 9 ! direction ( hi/ory & ! gr[? ( civilisation2 lat] on x is 8nature0 7comp>e ,nietzs*e's 8,/udies 9 ,inf9ity0 ) 8 8,z>a?u/ra072 at ano!r "t he is a my/ic1 at yet ano!r simplicity itself6 7,bjrnson & ,maurice ,maet]l9ck are good mod]n examples47 ,9 fact1 ! 8amplitude0 ( ! p]iods ( fam\s m5 is s great1 ! diff]5t revelations ( _! nature s v>i\s1 s _m diff]5t individuals appe> 9 !m1 t ! p]iodicity ( _! m5tal life may be tak5 almo/ z diagno/ic4 ,i mu/ make a rem>k suffici5tly obvi\s f all ?is1 z to ! exi/5ce ( almo/ incr$ibly great *anges 9 ! p]sonal appe>ance ( m5 ( g5ius f "t to "t4 ,comp>ison ( ! portraits at diff]5t times ( ,goe!1 ,bee?ov51 ,kant1 or ,s*op5hau] are en\gh to e/abli% ?is4 ,! numb] ( diff]5t aspects t ! face ( a man has assum$ may be tak5 almo/ z a physiognomical measure ( 8 tal5t4#i #i ,i _c help us+ ! ^w 8tal5t0 f "t to "t :5 ,i really mean g5ius2 b ,i wi% x to be rememb]$ t ,i am conv9c$ ( ! exi/5ce ( a fundam5tal di/9ction betwe5 8tal5t10 or 8gift$ness10 & 8g5ius40 ,p ) an un*ang+ expression are l[ 9 ! intellectual scale4 ,physiognomi/s1 !re=e1 mu/ n be surpris$ t m5 ( g5ius1 9 ^: faces a new side ( _! m9ds is cont9ually be+ reveal$1 are difficult to classify1 & t _! individualities leave little p]man5t m>k on _! features4 ,x is possible t my introductory description ( g5ius w be repudiat$ indignantly1 because x w\ld imply t a ,%akespe>e has ! vulg>ity ( 8 ,fal/aff1 ! rascality ( 8 ,iago1 ! boori%ness ( 8 ,caliban1 & because x id5tifies great m5 ) all ! l[ & contemptible ?+s t !y h describ$4 ,z a matt] ( fact1 m5 ( g5ius d con=m to my description1 & z _! biographies %[1 are liable to ! /range/ passions & ! mo/ repulsive in/9cts4 ,& yet ! objection is invalid1 z ! full] exposition ( ! !sis w reveal4 ,only ! mo/ sup]ficial survey ( ! argum5t c\ld support x1 :il/ ! exactly opposite conclusion is a mu* m likely inf]5ce4 ,zola1 :o has s fai?fully describ$ ! impulse to commit murd]1 did n himself commit a murd]1 because !re 7 s _m o!r *>act]s 9 him4 ,! actual murd]] is 9 ! grasp ( 8 own disposition3 ! au?or describ+ ! murd] is sway$ by a :ole k+dom ( impulses4 ,zola w\ld "k ! desire = murd] mu* bett] ?an ! actual murd]] w\ld "k x1 he w\ld recognise x 9 himself1 if x really came to ! surface 9 him1 & he w\ld be prep>$ = x4 ,9 su* ways ! crim9al in/9cts 9 great m5 are intellectualis$ & turn$ to arti/ic purposes z 9 ! case ( ,zola1 or to philosophic purposes z ) ,kant1 b n to actual crime4 ,! pres5ce ( a multitude ( possibilities 9 great m5 has important consequ5ces connect$ ) ! !ory ( h5ids t ,i elaborat$ 9 ! la/ *apt]4 ,a man und]/&s :at he already has )9 himself mu* m quickly ?an :at is =eign to him 77 x o!rwise !re w\ld be no int]c\rse possible3 z x is we d n realise h[ (t5 we fail to und]/& "o ano!r74 ,to ! g5ius1 :o und]/&s s mu* m ?an ! av]age man1 mu* m w be app>5t4 ,! s*em] w readily recognise 8 fell[2 an impassion$ play] easily reads ! same p[] 9 ano!r p]son2 :il/ ^? ) no special p[]s w obs]ve no?+4 ,art disc]ns itself be/1 z ,wagn] said4 ,9 ! case ( complex p]sonalities ! matt] /&s ?us3 "o ( ^! c und]/& o!r m5 bett] ?an !y c und]/& !mselves1 because )9 himself he has n only ! "* he is grasp+1 b also its opposite4 ,duality is necess>y = obs]vation & compreh5sion2 if we inquire f psy*ology :at is ! mo/ necess>y condition = becom+ consci\s ( a ?+1 = grasp+ x1 we %all f9d ! answ] 9 8contra/40 ,if ev]y?+ 7 a uni=m grey we %\ld h no idea ( col\r2 absolute unison ( s\nd w\ld soon produce sleep 9 all mank9d2 duality1 ! p[] :i* c diff]5tiate1 is ! orig9 ( ! al]t consci\sness4 ,?us x happ5s t no "o c und]/& himself 7 he to ?9k ( no?+ else all 8 life1 b he c und]/& ano!r to :om he is p>tly alike1 & f :om he is also p>tly q diff]5t4 ,su* a di/ribution ( qualities is ! condition mo/ fav\rable = und]/&+4 ,9 %ort1 to und]/& a man means to h equal p>ts ( himself & ( 8 opposite 9 "o4 ,t ?+s mu/ be pres5t 9 pairs ( contra/s if we are to be consci\s ( "o memb] ( ! pair is %[n by ! facts ( col\r-vision4 ,col\r-bl9dness always ext5ds to ! complem5t>y col\rs4 ,^? :o are r$ bl9d are also gre5 bl9d2 ^? :o are bl9d to blue h no consci\sness ( yell[4 ,?is law holds good = all m5tal ph5om5a2 x is a fundam5tal condition ( consci\sness4 ,! mo/ high-spirit$ p und]/& & exp]i5ce depression mu* m ?an ^? :o are ( level disposition4 ,any "o ) s ke5 a s5se ( delicacy & subtilty z ,%akespe>e mu/ also be capable ( extreme grossness4 ,! m types & _! contra/s a man unites 9 8 own m9d ! less w escape him1 s9ce obs]vation foll[s compreh5sion1 & ! m he w see & und]/& :at o!r m5 feel1 ?9k1 & wi%4 ,!re has nev] be5 a g5ius :o 0 n a great disc]n] ( m54 ,! great man sees ?r\gh ! simpl] man (t5 at a glance1 & w\ld be able to *>act]ise him completely4 ,mo/ m5 h ?is1 t1 or ! o!r faculty or s5se disproportionately develop$4 ,"o man kn[s all ! birds & tells _! diff]5t voices mo/ accurately4 ,ano!r has a love = plants & is devot$ to botany f 8 *ildhood4 ,"o man pores lov+ly into ! _m lay]$ rocks ( ! e>?1 & has only ! vague/ appreciation ( ! skies2 to ano!r ! attraction ( cold1 />-s[n space is supreme4 ,"o man is repell$ by ! m\nta9s & seeks ! re/less sea2 ano!r1 l ,nietzs*e1 gets no help f ! toss+ wat]s & hung]s = ! peace ( ! hills4 ,e man1 h[ev] simple he may be1 has "s side ( nature ) :i* he is 9 special sympa?y & = :i* 8 faculties are specially al]t4 ,& s ! ideal g5ius1 :o has all m5 )9 him1 has also all _! pref]5ces & all _! dislikes4 ,!re is 9 him n only ! univ]sality ( m51 b ( all nature4 ,he is ! man to :om all ?+s tell _! secrets1 to :om mo/ happ5s1 & :om lea/ escapes4 ,he und]/&s mo/ ?+s1 & ^? mo/ deeply1 because he has ! greate/ numb] ( ?+s to contra/ & comp>e !m )4 ,! g5ius is he :o is consci\s ( mo/1 & ( t mo/ acutely4 ,& s )\t d\bt 8 s5sations mu/ be mo/ acute2 b ?is mu/ n be und]/ood z imply+1 say1 9 ! arti/ ! ke5e/ p[] ( vision1 9 ! compos] ! mo/ acute he>+2 ! measure ( g5ius is n to be tak5 f ! acut5ess ( ! s5se organ b f t ( ! p]ceiv+ bra94 ,! consci\sness ( ! g5ius is1 !n1 ! fur!/ remov$ f ! h5id /age4 ,x has ! greate/1 mo/ limpid cle>ness & di/9ctness4 ,9 ?is way g5ius decl>es itself to be a k9d ( high] mascul9ity1 & ?us ! female _c be possess$ ( g5ius4 ,! conclusion ( ?is *apt] & ! la/ is simply t ! life ( ! male is a m highly consci\s life ?an t ( ! female1 & g5ius is id5tical ) ! highe/ & wide/ consci\sness4 ,?is extremely compreh5sive consci\sness ( ! highe/ types ( mank9d is due to ! enorm\s numb] ( contra/+ elem5ts 9 _! natures4 ,univ]sality is ! di/+ui%+ m>k ( g5ius4 ,!re is no su* ?+ z a special g5ius1 a g5ius = ma!matics1 or = music1 or ev5 = *ess1 b only a univ]sal g5ius4 ,! g5ius is a man :o kn[s ev]y?+ )\t hav+ le>n$ x4 ,x /&s to reason t ?is inf9ite k does n include !ories & sy/ems :i* h be5 =mulat$ by sci5ce f facts1 nei!r ! hi/ory ( ! ,spani% w> ( succession nor exp]im5ts 9 dia-magnetism4 ,! arti/ does n acquire 8 k ( ! col\rs reflect$ on wat] by cl\dy or sunny skies1 by a c\rse ( optics1 any m ?an x requires a deep /udy ( *>act]ology to judge o!r m54 ,b ! m gift$ a man is1 ! m he has /udi$ on 8 own acc\nt1 & ! m subjects he has made 8 own4 ,! !ory ( special g5ius1 accord+ to :i*1 = in/ance1 x is suppos$ t a musical 8g5ius0 %\ld be a fool at o!r subjects1 confuses g5ius ) tal5t4 ,a musician1 if truly great1 is j z well able to be univ]sal 9 8 k z a philosoph] or a poet4 ,su* an "o 0 ,bee?ov54 ,on ! o!r h&1 a musician may be z limit$ 9 ! sph]e ( 8 activity z any av]age man ( sci5ce4 ,su* an "o 0 ,johann ,/rauss1 :o1 9 spite ( 8 beautiful melodies1 _c be reg>d$ z a g5ius if only because ( ! abs5ce ( con/ructive faculty 9 him4 ,to come back to ! ma9 po9t2 !re are _m k9ds ( tal5t1 b only "o k9d ( g5ius1 & t is able to *oose any k9d ( tal5t & ma/] x4 ,!re is some?+ 9 g5ius common to all ^? :o possess x2 h[ev] mu* diff]5ce !re may seem to be betwe5 ! great philosoph]1 pa9t]1 musician1 poet1 or religi\s tea*]4 ,! p>ticul> tal5t ?r\gh ! m$ium ( :i* ! _s ( a man develops is ( less importance ?an has g5]ally be5 ?\ght4 ,! limits ( ! diff]5t arts c easily be pass$1 & mu* besides native inborn gifts h to be tak5 into acc\nt4 ,! hi/ory ( "o art %\ld be /udi$ along ) ! hi/ory ( o!r arts1 & 9 t way _m obscure ev5ts might be expla9$4 ,x is outside my pres5t purpose1 h[ev]1 to g into ! "q ( :at det]m9es a g5ius to become1 say1 a my/ic1 or1 say1 a great del9eator4 ,f g5ius itself1 ! common quality ( all ! diff]5t manife/ations ( g5ius1 woman is deb>r$4 ,i w discuss lat] z to :e!r su* ?+s are possible z pure sci5tific or te*nical g5ius z well z arti/ic & philosophical g5ius4 ,!re is good reason = a great] exactness 9 ! use ( ! ^w4 ,b t may come1 & h[ev] cle>ly we may yet be able to describe x woman w h to be exclud$ f x4 ,i am glad t ! c\rse ( my inquiry has be5 su* z to make x impossible = me to be *>g$ ) hav+ fram$ su* a def9ition ( g5ius z necess>ily to exclude woman f x4 ,i may n[ sum up ! conclusions ( ?is *apt]4 ,:il/ woman has no consci\sness ( g5ius1 except z manife/$ 9 "o p>ticul> p]son1 :o imposes 8 p]sonality on h]1 man has a deep capacity = realis+ x1 a capacity :i* ,c>lyle1 9 8 /ill little und]/ood book on 8,h]o-,wor%ip10 has describ$ s fully & p]man5tly4 ,9 8,h]o-,wor%ip10 moreov]1 ! idea is def9itely insi/$ on t g5ius is l9k$ ) manhood1 t x repres5ts an ideal mascul9ity 9 ! highe/ =m4 ,woman has no direct consci\sness ( x2 %e borr[s a k9d ( imp]fect consci\sness f man4 ,woman1 9 %ort1 has an unconsci\s life1 man a consci\s life1 & ! g5ius ! mo/ consci\s life4 ,,*apt] ,v ,,tal5t ,,& ,,memory ,! foll[+ obs]vation be>s on my h5id !ory3 ,i made a note1 half me*anically1 ( a page 9 a botanical "w f :i* lat] on ,i 0 go+ to make an extract4 ,some?+ 0 9 my m9d 9 h5id =m4 ,:at ,i ?\ght1 h[ ,i ?\ght x1 :at 0 !n knock+ at ! door ( my consci\sness1 ,i c\ld n rememb] a m9ute aft]w>ds1 9 spite ( ! h>de/ ef=t4 ,i take ?is case z a typical example ( ! h5id4 ,! m deeply impress$1 ! m detail$ a complex p]ception may be ! m easily does x reproduce itself4 ,cle>ness ( ! consci\sness is ! prelim9>y condition = rememb]+1 & ! memory ( ! m5tal /imulation is proportional to ! int5sity ( ! consci\sness4 8,i %all n =get t02 8,i %all rememb] t all my life02 8,t w nev] escape my memory aga940 ,su* phrases m5 use :5 ?+s h made a deep impression on !m1 ( mom5ts 9 :i* !y h ga9$ wisdom or h become ri*] by an important exp]i5ce4 ,z ! p[] ( be+ reproduc$ is directly proportionate to ! organisation ( a m5tal impression1 x is cle> t !re c be no recollection ( an absolute h5id4 ,z ! m5tal end[m5t ( a man v>ies ) ! organisation ( 8 accumulat$ exp]i5ces1 ! bett] end[$ he is1 ! m readily w he be able to rememb] 8 :ole pa/1 ev]y?+ t he has ev] ?\ght or he>d1 se5 or done1 p]ceiv$ or felt1 ! m completely 9 fact w he be able to reproduce 8 :ole life4 ,univ]sal remembrance ( all its exp]i5ces1 !re=e1 is ! sure1 mo/ g5]al1 & mo/ easily prov$ m>k ( a g5ius4 ,if a common !ory1 especially popul> ) ! philosoph]s ( ! c(fee-h\se1 be true1 t productive m5 7because !y are always cov]+ new gr\nd7 h no memory1 x is (t5 because !y are productive only f be+ on new gr\nd4 ,! great ext5t & acut5ess ( ! memory ( m5 ( g5ius1 :i* ,i propose to lay d[n dogmatically z a necess>y inf]5ce f my !ory1 )\t attempt+ to prove x fur!r1 is n incompatible ) _! rapid loss ( ! facts impress$ on !m 9 s*ool1 ! tables ( ,greek v]bs1 & s =?4 ,_! memory is ( :at !y h exp]i5c$1 n ( :at !y h le>n$4 ,( all t 0 acquir$ = exam9ation purposes only s mu* w be reta9$ z 0 9 h>mony ) ! natural tal5t ( ! pupil4 ,?us a h\se-pa9t] may h a bett] memory = col\rs ?an a great philosoph]2 ! mo/ n>r[ philologi/ may rememb] ,greek aori/s t he has le>n$ by he>t bett] ?an 8 tea*]1 :o may none ! less be a great poet4 ,! uselessness ( ! exp]im5tal s*ool ( psy*ology 7not)/&+ _! m>vell\s ars5al ( in/rum5ts ( exp]im5tal precision7 is %[n by _! expectation ( gett+ results z to memory f te/s ) lett]s1 unconnect$ words1 long r[s ( figures4 ,^! exp]im5ts h s little be>+ on ! true memory ( man1 on ! memory by :i* he recalls ! exp]i5ces ( 8 life1 t "o wond]s if su* psy*ologi/s h realis$ t su* a ?+ z ! m9d exi/s4 ,! cu/om>y exp]im5ts place ! mo/ diff]5t subjects "u ! same conditions1 pay no att5tion to ! individuality ( ^! subjects1 & treat !m m]ely z good or bad regi/]+ app>atus4 ,!re is a p>able 9 ! fact t ! two ,g]man words 8bem]k50 7take notice (7 & 8m]k50 7rememb]7 come f ! same root4 ,only :at is h>moni\s ) "s inborn quality w be reta9$4 ,:5 a man rememb]s a ?+1 x is because he 0 capable ( tak+ "s int]e/ 9 ! ?+2 :5 he =gets1 x is because he 0 un9t]e/$4 ,! religi\s man w surely & exactly rememb] texts1 ! poet v]ses & ! ma!matician equations4 ,?is br+s u 9 ano!r fa%ion to ! subject ( ! la/ *apt]1 & to ano!r reason = ! great memories ( g5ius4 ,! m significant a man is1 ! m diff]5t p]sonalities he unites 9 himself1 ! m int]e/s t are conta9$ 9 him1 ! m wide 8 memory mu/ be4 ,all m5 h practically ! same opportunities ( p]ception1 b ! va/ majority ( m5 appreh5d only an inf9itesimal "p ( :at !y h p]ceiv$4 ,! ideal g5ius is "o 9 :om p]ception & appreh5sion are id5tical 9 _! field4 ,( c\rse no su* be+ actually exi/s4 ,on ! o!r h&1 !re is no man :o has appreh5d$ no?+ t he has p]ceiv$4 ,9 ?is way we may take x t all degrees ( g5ius 7n tal5t7 exi/2 no male is q )\t a trace ( g5ius4 ,complete g5ius is an ideal2 no man is absolutely )\t ! quality1 & no man possesses x completely4 ,appreh5sion or absorption1 & memory or ret5tion1 v>y toge!r 9 _! ext5t & _! p]man5ce4 ,!re is an un9t]rupt$ gradation f ! man ^: m5tality is unconnect$ f mom5t to mom5t1 & to :om no incid5ts c signify any?+ because !re is )9 him no?+ to comp>e !m ) 7su* an extreme1 ( c\rse1 does n exi/7 to ! fully develop$ m9ds = :i* ev]y?+ is un=gettable1 because ( ! firm impressions made & ! sur5ess ) :i* !y are absorb$4 ,! extreme ( g5ius also does n exi/1 because ev5 ! greate/ g5ius is n :olly a g5ius at e mom5t ( 8 life4 ,:at is at once a d$uction f ! necess>y connection betwe5 memory & g5ius1 & a pro( ( ! actuality ( ! connection1 lies 9 ! extraord9>y memory = m9ute details %[n by ! man ( g5ius4 ,because ( ! univ]sality ( 8 m9d1 ev]y?+ has only "o int]pretation = him1 an int]pretation (t5 unsuspect$ at ! "t2 & s ?+s cl+ ob/9ately 9 8 memory & rema9 !re inext+ui%ably1 al?\gh he may h tak5 n ! smalle/ tr\ble to take note ( !m4 ,& s "o may almo/ take z ano!r m>k ( ! g5ius t ! phrase 8?is is no long] true0 has no mean+ = him4 ,!re is no?+ t is no long] true = him1 probably j because he has a cle>] idea ?an o!r m5 ( ! *anges t come ) "t4 ,! foll[+ appe>s to be "o ( ! be/ means = ! objective exam9ation ( ! end[m5t ( a man3 ,if aft] a long sep>ation f him we resume ! new int]c\rse ) ! circum/ances ( ! la/1 !n we %all f9d t ! highly end[$ man has =gott5 no?+1 t he vividly & completely takes up ! subject f :]e x 0 left (f ) ! fulle/ recollection ( ! details4 ,h[ mu* ord9>y m5 =get ( _! lives any "o c prove to 8 a/oni%m5t & horror4 ,x may happ5 t we h be5 = h\rs importantly engag$ ) a man a few weeks be=e1 & we may f9d t he has =gott5 all ab\t x4 ,x is true t if "o recalls all ! circum/ances to 8 m9d1 he beg9s to rememb]1 &1 f9ally1 ) suffici5t help1 may rememb] almo/ completely4 ,su* exp]i5ce has made me ?9k t !re may be an empirical pro( ( ! hypo!sis t no absolute =gett+ ev] occurs2 t if ! "r me?od ) ! individual be *os5 recollection may always be induc$4 ,x foll[s also t f "o's own exp]i5ce1 f :at "o has ?\ght or said1 he>d or read1 felt or done1 "o c give ! smalle/ possible to ano!r1 t ! o!r does n already "k4 ,consid]ation ( ! am\nt t a man c take 9 f ano!r w\ld seem to s]ve z a sort ( objective measure ( 8 g5ius1 a measure t does n h to wait = an e/imation ( 8 actual creative ef=ts4 ,i am n go+ to discuss ! ext5t to :i* ?is !ory opposes curr5t views on education1 b ,i recomm5d p>5ts & tea*]s to pay att5tion to x4 ,! ext5t to :i* a man c detect diff]5ces & resemblances mu/ dep5d on 8 memories4 ,?is faculty w be be/ develop$ 9 ^? ^: pa/ p]meates _! pres5t1 all ! mom5ts ( ! life ( :om are amalgamat$4 ,su* p]sons w h ! greate/ opportunities ( detect+ resemblances & s f9d+ ! mat]ial = comp>isons4 ,!y w always seize hold ( f ! pa/ :at has ! greate/ resemblance to ! pres5t exp]i5ce1 & ! two exp]i5ces w be comb9$ 9 su* a way t no simil>ities or diff]5ces w be conceal$4 ,& s !y are able to ma9ta9 ! pa/ aga9/ ! influ5ce ( ! pres5t4 ,x is n )\t reason t f "t immemorial ! special m]it ( poetry has be5 consid]$ to be its ri*ness 9 beautiful comp>isons & pictures1 or t we turn to aga9 & aga91 or await our fav\rite images ) impati5ce :5 we read ,hom] or ,%akespe>e or ,klop/ock4 ,to-day :51 = ! fir/ "t = a c5tury & a half1 ,g]many is )\t great poets or pa9t]s1 & :5 none ! less x is impossible to f9d any "o :o is n an 8au?or10 ! p[] ( cle> & beautiful comp>ison seems to h gone4 ,a p]iod ! nature ( :i* c be/ be describ$ 9 vague & dubi\s words1 ! philosophy ( :i* has become 9 m ?an "o s5se ! philosophy ( ! unconsci\s c conta9 no?+ great4 ,consci\sness is ! m>k ( greatness1 & be=e x ! unconsci\s is disp]s$ z ! sun disp]ses a mi/4 ,if only consci\sness 7 to come to ?is age1 h[ quickly voices t are n[ fam\s w\ld become sil5t4 ,x is only 9 full consci\sness1 9 :i* ! exp]i5ce ( ! pres5t assumes great] int5sity by its union ) all ! exp]i5ces ( ! pa/1 t imag9ation1 ! necess>y quality = all philosophical z = all arti/ic ef=t1 c f9d a place4 ,x is untrue1 !re=e1 t wom5 h m imag9ation ?an m54 ,! exp]i5ces on acc\nt ( :i* m5 h assign$ high] p[]s ( imag9ation to wom5 come entirely f ! imag9ative sexual life ( wom54 ,! only inf]5ces t c be drawn f ?is d n belong to ! pres5t section ( my "w4 ,! abs5ce ( wom5 f ! hi/ory ( music mu/ be ref]r$ to deep] causes2 b x also supports my cont5tion t wom5 are devoid ( imag9ation4 ,to produce music requires a great deal m imag9ation ?an ! male/ woman possesses1 & mu* m ?an is requir$ = o!r k9ds ( arti/ic or = sci5tific ef=t4 ,!re is no?+ 9 nature1 no?+ 9 ! sph]e ( ! s5ses1 correspond+ directly ) s\nd pictures4 ,music has no relation to ! _w ( exp]i5ce2 !re is no 8music10 no *ords or melodies 9 ! natural _w2 ^! h to be evolv$ f ! imag9ation ( ! compos]4 ,e o!r art has m def9ite relations to empirical art4 ,ev5 ar*itecture1 :i* has be5 comp>$ ) music1 has def9ite relations to matt]1 al?\gh1 l music1 x has no anticipations 9 ! s5ses4 ,ar*itecture1 too1 is an entirely mascul9e occupation4 ,! v idea ( a female ar*itect excites compassion4 ,! s-call$ /upefy+ effect ( music on ! creative or practical musician 7especially in/rum5tal music7 dep5ds on ! fact t ev5 ! s5se ( smell is a bett] guide to man 9 ! _w ( exp]i5ce ?an ! cont5ts ( a musical "w4 ,& x is j ?is complete abs5ce ( all relation to ! _w ( sight1 ta/e1 & smell1 t makes music specially unfitt$ to express ! female nature4 ,x also expla9s :y ?is peculi>ity ( 8 art dem&s ! highe/ grade ( imag9ation f a musician1 & :y ^? to :om musical compositions 8come0 seem /rang] to _! fell[ m5 ?an pa9t]s or sculptors4 ,! s-call$ 8imag9ation0 ( wom5 mu/ be v diff]5t f t ( m51 s9ce !re is no woman ) ev5 ! same position 9 ! hi/ory ( music t ,angelica ,kaufmann _h 9 art4 ,:]e any?+ obvi\sly dep5ds on /rong m\ld+ wom5 h n ! smalle/ lean+ t[>ds its production1 nei!r 9 philosophy nor 9 music1 9 ! pla/ic arts nor 9 ar*itecture4 ,:]e1 h[ev]1 a weak & vague s5tim5tality c be express$ ) little ef=t1 z 9 pa9t+ or v]se-mak+1 or 9 pseudo-my/icism & !osophy1 wom5 h s\ght & f\nd a suitable field = _! ef=ts4 ,_! lack ( productiv5ess 9 ! =m] sph]e is 9 h>mony ) ! vagu5ess ( ! psy*ical life ( wom54 ,music is ! ne>e/ possible approa* to ! organisation ( a s5sation4 ,no?+ is m def9ite1 *>act]i/ic1 & impressive ?an a melody1 no?+ t w m /rongly resi/ oblit]ation4 ,"o rememb]s mu* long] :at is sung ?an :at is spok51 & ! arias bett] ?an ! recitatives4 ,let u note specially "h t ! usual phrases ( ! def5d]s ( wom5 d n apply to ! case ( wom54 ,music is n "o ( ! arts to :i* wom5 h _h access only s rec5tly t x is too soon to expect fruits2 f ! remote/ antiquity wom5 h sung & play$4 ,& yet4444 ,x is to be rememb]$ t ev5 9 ! case ( draw+ & pa9t+ wom5 h n[ _h opportunities = at lea/ two c5turies4 ,e "o kn[s h[ _m girls le>n to draw & sket*1 & x _c be said t !re has n yet be5 "t = results 7 results possible4 ,z !re are s few female pa9t]s ) ! smalle/ importance 9 ! hi/ory ( art1 x mu/ be t !re is some?+ 9 ! nature ( ?+s aga9/ x4 ,z a matt] ( fact1 ! pa9t+ & et*+ ( wom5 is no m ?an a sort ( elegant1 luxuri\s h&iwork4 ,! s5su\s1 physical elem5t ( col\r is m suitable = !m ?an ! intellectual "w ( =mal l9e-draw+1 & h5ce x is1 t :]eas wom5 h acquir$ "s small di/9ction 9 pa9t+ !y h ga9$ none 9 draw+4 ,! p[] ( giv+ =m to *aos is ) ^? 9 :om ! mo/ univ]sal memory has made ! wide/ compreh5sion possible2 x is a quality ( ! mascul9e g5ius4 ,i regret t ,i mu/ s cont9ually use ! ^w g5ius1 z if t %\ld apply only to a ca/e z well def9$ f ^? bel[ z income-tax pay]s are f ! untax$4 ,! ^w g5ius 0 v probably inv5t$ by a man :o _h small claims on x himself2 great] m5 w\ld h und]/ood bett] :at to be a g5ius really 01 & probably !y w\ld h come to see t ! ^w c\ld be appli$ to mo/ p4 ,goe! said t p]haps only a g5ius is able to und]/& a g5ius4 ,!re are probably v few p :o h n at "s "t ( _! lives _h "s quality ( g5ius4 ,if !y h n _h su*1 x is probable t !y h also be5 )\t great sorr[ or great pa94 ,!y w\ld h ne$$ only to live suffici5tly int5tly = a "t = "s quality to reveal itself4 ,! poems ( fir/ love are a case 9 po9t1 & c]ta9ly su* love is a suffici5t /imulus4 ,x mu/ n be =gott5 t q ord9>y m5 9 mom5ts ( excitem5t1 9 ang] at "s und]h&$ de$1 h f\nd words ) :i* !y nev] w\ld h be5 cr$it$4 ,! great] "p ( :at is call$ expression 9 art z 9 language dep5ds 7if ! read] w rememb] :at ,i h said ab\t ! process ( 8cl>ification07 on ! fact t "s individual m ri*ly end[$ cl>ifies1 organises1 & exhibits "s idea almo/ in/antane\sly1 an idea :i* to a less end[$ p]son 0 /ill 9 ! h5id =m4 ,! c\rse ( cl>ification is mu* %ort5$ 9 ! m9d ( ! second p]son4 ,if x really 7 ! case1 z popul> op9ion has tri$ to e/abli%1 t ! g5ius 7 sep>at$ f ord9>y m5 by a ?ick wall ?r\gh :i* no s\nd c\ld p5etrate1 !n all und]/&+ ( ! ef=ts ( g5ius w\ld be d5i$ to ord9>y m51 & _! works w\ld fail to make any impression on !m4 ,all hopes ( progress dep5d on ?is be+ untrue4 ,& x is untrue4 ,! diff]5ce betwe5 m5 ( g5ius & ! o!rs is quantitative n qualitative1 ( degree n ( k9d4 ,!re is1 moreov]1 v little s5se 9 prev5t+ "y p f giv+ expression to _! ideas on ! pretext t !y h less exp]i5ce ?an h old] p]sons4 ,!re are _m :o may live a ?\s& ye>s )\t enc\nt]+ exp]i5ce ( any value4 ,x c\ld only be 9 a society ( p]sons equally gift$ t su* an idea c\ld h any mean+4 ,because ! life ( ! g5ius is m int5se ev5 9 8 e>lie/ ye>s ?an t ( o!r *ildr51 8 memory c g fur!r back4 ,9 extreme cases ! memory may be complete & vivid back to ! ?ird ye> ( life1 :]eas 9 mo/ recollection beg9s mu* lat]4 ,i "k "s p ^: e>lie/ recollections date only f _! eigh? ye>1 & !re are in/ances ( an ev5 lat] beg9n+ ( ! consci\s life4 ,i d n ma9ta9 t ! date at :i* active memory beg9s c be tak5 z a measure ( relative g5ius1 t he :o rememb]s f 8 second ye> is s mu* ! m ( a g5ius ?an he :o c g back only to 8 f\r? or fif? ye>4 ,b 9 a g5]al way1 ,i believe ! p>allel to hold good4 ,ev5 9 ! cases ( ! greate/ m51 "s "t1 great] or %ort]1 elaps$ betwe5 ! date ( _! e>lie/ recollection & ! "t f :i* onw>ds !y rememb] ev]y?+1 f ! "t1 9 fact1 9 :i* _! g5ius 0 ripe4 ,b 9 ! case ( mo/ m5 !re is =getfulness ( ! great] "p ( _! lives2 !y are consci\s only t !y !mselves & none o!r h liv$ _! lives4 ,out ( _! :ole lives !re only rema9 c]ta9 mom5ts1 & scatt]$ recollections1 :i* s]ve z sign-po/s4 ,if !y are ask$ ab\t any p>ticul> ?+ !y c only tell1 = in/ance1 because 9 su* & su* a mon? !y 7 s old1 or !y wore su* & su* clo!s1 !y liv$ at ?is place1 or t _! income 0 s mu*4 ,if "o has liv$ ) !m 9 =m] ye>s1 x is only aft] great tr\ble t ! pa/ c be br\ght to _! m9d4 ,9 su* cases "o is surely ju/ifi$ 9 say+ t su* a p]son is ungift$1 or at lea/ 9 n consid]+ him conspicu\sly able4 ,! reque/ = an autobiography w\ld put mo/ m5 into a mo/ pa9ful position2 !y c\ld sc>cely tell if !y 7 ask$ :at !y _h done ! day be=e4 ,memory ) mo/ p is q spasmodic & purely associative4 ,9 ! case ( ! man ( g5ius e impression t he has receiv$ endures2 he is always "u ! influ5ce ( impressions2 & s ne>ly all m5 ( g5ius t5d to suff] f fix$ ideas4 ,! psy*ical condition ( m5's m9ds may be comp>$ ) a set ( bells close toge!r1 & s arrang$ t 9 ! ord9>y man a bell r+s only :5 "o beside x s\nds1 & ! vibration la/s only a mom5t4 ,9 ! g5ius1 :5 a bell s\nds x vibrates s /rongly t x sets 9 action ! :ole s]ies1 & rema9s 9 action ?r\gh\t life4 ,! latt] k9d ( movem5t (t5 gives rise to extraord9>y conditions & absurd impulses1 t may la/ = weeks toge!r & t =m ! basis ( ! suppos$ k9%ip ( g5ius ) insanity4 ,= simil> reasons gratitude is app>5tly ! r>e/ human virtue4 ,p are (t5 v consci\s ( h[ mu* !y h borr[$1 b !y nei!r c nor w try to rememb] ! necessity 9 :i* !y /ood1 nor ! fre$om :i* t help br\ght !m4 ,ev5 if want ( memory 7 really ! cause ( +ratitude1 x w\ld n be suffici5t = a man to possess a m>vell\s memory to h a l _s ( gratitude4 ,a special condition is also necess>y1 b its description _c be und]tak5 "h4 ,f ! connection betwe5 gift$ness & memory :i* is s (t5 mi/ak5 & d5i$ because x is n s\ght :]e x is to be f\nd1 f ! p[] ( self recollection1 a fur!r fact is to be d$uc$4 ,! poet :o feels urg$ to write )\t prem$itation1 )\t reflection1 )\t hav+ will+ly press$ ! p$al2 ! musician to :om ! desire to compose has come1 s t he mu/ create :e!r he w or no1 ev5 if he feels m incl9$ to sleep or to re/2 ^!1 9 su* mom5ts1 w simply reproduce ?\ghts !y h c>ri$ 9 _! heads all _! lives4 ,a compos] :o c rememb] none ( 8 songs or subjects by he>t1 or a poet :o _c recollect any ( 8 poems--)\t hav+ c>efully le>n$ !m--su* m5 are 9 no s5se really great4 ,be=e we apply ^! rem>ks to ! consid]ation ( ! m5tal diff]5ces ( ! sexes1 we mu/ make yet "o m di/9ction betwe5 diff]5t k9ds ( memory4 ,! individual mom5ts 9 ! life ( a gift$ man are n rememb]$ z disconnect$ po9ts1 n z diff]5t p>ticles ( "t1 ea* "o sep>at$ & def9$ f ! foll[+ "o1 z ! num]als "o1 two1 & s on4 ,! result ( self-obs]vation %[s t sleep1 ! limitations ( consci\sness1 ! gaps 9 memory1 ev5 special exp]i5ces1 appe> to be 9 "s my/]i\s way "o great :ole2 incid5ts d n foll[ ea* o!r l ! tick+s ( a wat*1 b !y pass along 9 a s+le unbrok5 /ream4 ,) ord9>y m5 ! mom5ts :i* are unit$ 9 a close cont9uity out ( ! orig9al discrete multiplicity are v few1 & ! c\rse ( _! lives resembles a little brook1 :]eas ) ! g5ius x is m l a mighty riv] into :i* all ! little rivulets fl[ f af>2 t is to say1 ! univ]sal compreh5sion ( g5ius vibrates to no exp]i5ce 9 :i* all ! individual mom5ts h n be5 ga!r$ up & /or$4 ,?is peculi> cont9uity by :i* a man fir/ realises t he exi/s1 t he is1 & t he is 9 ! _w1 is all compreh5sive 9 ! g5ius1 limit$ to a few important mom5ts 9 ! m$iocre1 & altoge!r lack+ 9 woman4 ,:5 a woman looks back ov] h] life & lives aga9 h] exp]i5ces1 !re is pres5t$ no cont9u\s1 unbrok5 /ream1 b only a few scatt]$ po9ts4 ,& :at k9d ( po9ts8 ,!y are j ^? :i* accord ) woman's natural in/9cts4 ,( :at ^! int]e/s exclusively consi/ ! second *apt] gave a prelim9>y idea2 & ^? :o rememb] ! ideas 9 "q w n be a/oni%$ at ! foll[+ facts3 ,! female is conc]n$ altoge!r ) "o class ( recollections--^? connect$ ) ! sexual impulse & reproduction4 ,%e ?9ks ( h] lov]s & proposals1 ( h] m>riage day1 ( e *ild z if x 7 a doll2 ( ! fl[]s :i* %e receiv$ at e ball1 ! numb]1 size1 & price ( ! b\quets2 ( e s]5ade2 ( e v]se :i* 7z %e fondly imag9es7 0 writt5 = h]2 ( e phrase by :i* a lov] has impress$ h]2 b above all--) an exactness :i* is z contemptible z x is disquiet+ to h]self--( e complim5t )\t exception t has ev] be5 paid h]4 ,t is all t ! real woman recalls ( h] life4 ,b x is j ^? ?+s :i* human be+s nev] =get1 & ^? !y _c rememb] t give ! clue to k ( _! life & "*4 ,x belongs to a lat] p]iod ( ! book to g m ?or\ghly into ! reason :y ! female has precisely ! remembrances %e has4 ,"s important conclusion may be expect$ f reflection on ! incr$ible memory ) :i* wom5 recall all ! adulation & flatt]y1 all ! pro(s ( gallantry1 :i* h happ5$ to !m s9ce *ildhood4 ,:atev] may be urg$ aga9/ ! pres5t complete limitation ( ! female memory to ! sph]e ( sexuality & conjugal life1 x is to me q evid5t4 ,v>i\s argum5ts ab\t girls' s*ools1 & s =?1 ,i am prep>$ =4 ,^! difficulties w h to be cle>$ away lat]4 ,b ,i mu/ j say aga9 t all memory1 :i* is to be us$ z a means ( psy*ological def9ition ( ! individual1 c include only ! memory ( :at has be5 le>nt :5 le>n+ means actual exp]i5ce4 ,! explanation ( ! discont9uity 9 ! psy*ical life ( wom5 7ref]5ce to :i* is introduc$ "h1 only because x is a necess>y psy*ological factor 9 ! problem ( memory1 & )\t ref]5ce to its spirituali/ic or ideali/ic significance7 c be rea*$ only :5 ! nature ( cont9uity is /udi$ ) ref]5ce to ! deepe/ problems ( philosophy & psy*ology4 ,z a pro( ( ! fact ,i w at pres5t quote no?+ m ?an ! /atem5t ( ,lotze1 :i* has s (t5 caus$ a/oni%m5t1 t wom5 mu* m readily submit !mselves to new relation%ips & m easily accommodate !mselves to !m ?an m51 9 :om ! p>v5u c be se5 mu* long]1 :]eas "o might n be able to tell ! peasant f ! pe]ess1 ! woman br\ght up 9 poor surr\nd+s f ! patrician's daught]4 ,lat] on ,i %all deal m exhau/ively ) ?is subject4 ,at any rate1 x w n[ be se5 :y 7if nei!r vanity1 desire = gossip1 nor imitation drives !m to x7 only ! bett] m5 write d[n recollections ( _! lives1 & h[ ,i p]ceive 9 ?is a /rong evid5ce ( ! connection betwe5 memory & gift$ness4 ,x is n z if e man ( g5ius wi%$ to write an autobiography3 ! incitem5t to autobiography comes f special1 v deep-seat$ psy*ological conditions4 ,b on ! o!r h&1 ! writ+ ( a full autobiography1 if x is ! outcome ( a g5u9e desire1 is always ! sign ( a sup]ior man4 ,= real fai?ful memory is ! s\rce ( rev]5ce4 ,! really great w\ld resi/ any temptation to give up 8 pa/ 9 ex*ange = mat]ial advantage or m5tal heal?2 ! greate/ treasures ( ! _w1 ev5 happ9ess itself1 he w\ld n take 9 ex*ange = 8 memories4 ,! desire = a draught ( ! wat]s ( ,le! is ! trait ( m$iocre or inf]ior natures4 ,& h[ev] mu* a really great man1 z ,goe! says1 may condemn & abhor 8 pa/ fail+s1 & al?\gh he sees o!rs cl++ fa/ to !irs1 he w nev] smile at ^? pa/ actions & fail+s ( 8 own1 or make m]ry ov] 8 e>ly mode ( life & ?\ght4 ,! class ( p]sons1 n[ s mu* 9 evid5ce1 :o claim to h 8conqu]$0 _! pa/s1 h ! smalle/ possible claim to ! ^w 8conqu]40 ,!y are ^? :o idly relate t !y =m]ly believ$ ?is or ! o!r1 b h n[ 8ov]come0 _! beliefs1 :]eas !y are z little 9 e>ne/ ab\t ! pres5t z !y 7 ab\t ! pa/4 ,!y see only ! me*anism1 n ! s\l ( ?+s1 & at no /age :at !y believe !mselves to h conqu]$ 0 deep 9 _! natures4 ,9 contra/ ) ^! x may be notic$ ) :at pa9ful c>e great m5 r5d] ev5 !1 app>5tly1 mo/ m9ute details 9 _! own biographies3 = !m ! pa/ & pres5t are equal2 ) o!rs nei!r ( ! two are real4 ,! fam\s man realises h[ ev]y?+1 ev5 ! smalle/1 mo/ second>y1 matt]s play$ an important "p 9 8 life1 h[ !y h help$ 8 developm5t1 & to ?is fact is due 8 extraord9>y rev]5ce = 8 own memoirs4 ,& su* an autobiography is n writt5 all at once1 z x 71 ) "o ev5t treat$ l ano!r1 & )\t m$itation2 nor does ! idea ( x sudd5ly occur to a man2 ! mat]ial = su* a "w by a great man1 s to speak1 is always at h&4 ,8 new exp]i5ces acquire a deep] significance because ( ! pa/1 :i* is always pres5t to him1 & h5ce ! great man & only ! great man1 feels t he himself is 9 v tru? a 8man ( de/9y40 ,& s x comes t great m5 are always m 8sup]/iti\s0 ?an av]age m54 ,to sum up1 ,i may say3 ,a man is himself important precisely 9 proportion t all ?+s seem important to him4 ,9 ! c\rse ( fur!r inve/igation ?is dictum w be se5 to h a deep significance ev5 ap>t f its be>+ on ! univ]sality1 compreh5sion1 & comp>ison exhibit$ by ! g5ius4 ,! position ( woman 9 ^! matt]s is n difficult to expla94 ,a real woman nev] becomes consci\s ( a de/9y1 ( h] own de/9y2 %e is n h]oic2 %e fights mo/ = h] possessions1 & !re is no?+ tragic 9 ! /ruggle z h] own fate is decid$ ) ! fate ( h] possessions4 ,inasmu* z woman is )\t cont9uity1 %e c h no true rev]5ce2 z a fact1 rev]5ce is a purely male virtue4 ,a man is fir/ rev]5t ab\t himself1 & self-respect is ! fir/ /age 9 rev]5ce = all ?+s4 ,b x co/s a woman v little to break (f ) h] pa/2 if ! ^w irony c\ld be fitt+ly us$ "h1 "o might say t a man does n easily reg>d 8 pa/ ) irony & sup]iority z wom5 appe> to d--& n only aft] m>riage4 ,lat] on ,i %all %[ h[ wom5 are exactly ! opposite ( t :i* rev]5ce means4 ,i w\ld r be sil5t ab\t ! rev]5ce ( wid[s4 ,! sup]/ition ( wom5 is psy*ologically absolutely diff]5t f ! sup]/itions ( fam\s m54 ,! rev]5t relation to "o's own pa/1 :i* dep5ds on a real cont9uity ( memory1 & :i* is possible only by compreh5sion1 c be %[n 9 relation to a /ill wid] & deep] subject4 ,:e!r a man has a real relation%ip to 8 own pa/ or n1 involves ! "q z to :e!r he has a desire = immortality1 or if ! idea ( dea? is indiff]5t to him4 ,! desire = immortality is to-day1 z a rule1 treat$ %amefully1 & 9 a v diff]5t _s4 ,n only is ! problem treat$ z m]ely ontological1 b ! psy*ological side ( x is only trifl$ )4 ,x has be5 held t x is connect$1 l ! doctr9e ( ! transmigration ( s\ls1 ) ! feel+ t we h all exp]i5c$1 :51 9 do+ some?+ c]ta9ly = ! fir/ "t1 we seem to rememb] hav+ gone ?r\gh ! same exp]i5ce be=e4 ,ano!r g5]ally adopt$ view is to d]ive ! idea ( immortality f ! belief 9 spirits1 z has be5 done by ,tylor1 ,sp5c]1 ,av5>ius1 & o!rs1 al?\gh 9 any o!r age ?an ?is age ( exp]im5tal psy*ology x w\ld h be5 dismiss$ a priori4 ,i am sure t x mu/ seem impossible to ! majority ( ?9k+ m5 to reg>d a belief s important to mank9d1 ab\t :i* !re has be5 s mu* /rife1 z m]ely ! la/ /age 9 a syllogism ( :i* ! fir/ premiss is ! midnight dream ( a dead man4 ,h[ c ph5om5a ( t k9d expla9 ! belief 9 ! cont9uity ( _! lives aft] dea? held s firmly by ,goe! or ,ba*1 or ! desire = immortality :i* speaks to u 9 ,bee?ov5's la/ sonatas8 ,! desire = ! p]si/5ce ( ! consci\s self mu/ spr+ f s\rces mighti] ?an ^! feeble rationali/ic guesses4 ,! deep] s\rce ( ! belief dep5ds on ! relation ( a man to 8 own pa/4 ,our consci\sness & vision ( ! pa/ is ! /ronge/ gr\nd = our desire to be consci\s 9 ! future4 ,! man :o values 8 pa/1 :o holds 8 m5tal life 9 great] respect ?an 8 corporeal life1 is n will+ to give up 8 consci\sness at dea?4 ,& s ?is organic prim>y desire = immortality is /ronge/ 9 m5 ( g5ius1 9 ! m5 ^: pa/s are ri*e/4 ,?is connection betwe5 ! desire = immortality & memory receives /rong support f :at is relat$ by ^? :o h be5 rescu$ f sudd5 dea?4 ,ev5 if !y _h n ?\ght x out be=e !y relive _! pa/ 9 a few mom5ts1 at once & ) frantic rapidity4 ,! feel+ ( :at is imp5d+ br+s 9 viol5t contra/ ! int5sity ( ! pres5t consci\sness & ! idea t x may cease = ev]4 ,9 reality we "k v little ( ! m5tal /ate ( ! dy+4 ,x takes m ?an an ord9>y p]son to int]pret x1 & = reasons connect$ ) :at ,i h be5 say+ m5 ( g5ius usually avoid dea?-b$s4 ,b x is q wrong to ascribe ! sudd5 appe>ance ( religion 9 s _m p :o are fatally ill1 to a desire to make sure ( _! future /ate4 ,x is extremely sup]ficial to assume t ! doctr9e ( hell c = ! fir/ "t assume su* an importance to ! dy+ z to make !m afraid to pass away 8) a lie on _! lips40#aj #aj ,i v5ture to rem9d read]s h[ (t5 at ! approa* ( dea? ^? :o h be5 occupi$ ) purely sci5tific matt]s h turn$ to religi\s problems1 e4g41 ,newton1 ,gauss1 ,riemann1 ,web]4 ,! important po9t is ?is3 ,:y d m5 :o h liv$ ?r\gh\t a ly+ life feel t[>ds ! end a sudd5 desire = tru?8 ,& :y are o!rs s horrifi$1 al?\gh !y d n believe 9 puni%m5t 9 ! next _w1 :5 !y he> ( a man dy+ ) a lie on 8 lips or ) an unrep5t$ action8 ,& :y h bo? ! h>dness ( he>t until ! end & ! dea?-b$ rep5tance appeal$ s =cibly to ! imag9ation ( poets8 ,! discussion z to ! 8eu?anasia0 ( a!i/s1 :i* 0 s popul> 9 ! eighte5? c5tury1 is m ?an a m]e hi/orical curiosity z ,f4 ,a4 ,lange consid]$ x4 ,i adduce ^! consid]ations n m]ely to sugge/ a possibility :i* is h>dly m ?an a guess4 ,x seems to be un?9kable t x is n ! case t _m m p ?an actual g5iuses h "s trace ( g5ius4 ,! quantitative diff]5ce 9 natural end[m5t w be mo/ m>k$ at ! mom5t :5 ! end[m5t becomes active4 ,& = mo/ m5 ?is mom5t is ! po9t ( dea?4 ,if we 7 n accu/om$ to reg>d m5 ( g5ius z a sep>ate class %ut (f f ! o!rs l ! pay]s ( income-tax1 we %\ld f9d less difficulty 9 graft+ ^! new ideas on ! old4 ,& j z ! e>lie/ recollections ( *ildhood :i* a man has are n ! result ( "s ext]nal ev5t break+ ?r\gh ! cont9uity ( ! pa/ c\rse ( 8 life1 b are ! result ( 8 int]nal developm5t1 !re comes to e "o a day on :i* 8 consci\sness is s int5sifi$ t remembrance rema9s1 & f t "t onw>ds1 accord+ to 8 end[m5t1 m or few] remembrances are =m$ 7a factor :i* by itself upsets ! :ole ( mod]n psy*ology71 s 9 diff]5t m5 !re are _m diff]5t /imulants ( ! consci\sness ( :i* ! la/ is ! h\r ( dea?1 & f ! po9t ( view ( _! degree ( g5ius m5 might almo/ be classifi$ by ! numb] ( ?+s t excite _! consci\sness4 ,i take ?is opportunity ( aga9 urg+ ! fals5ess ( a doctr9e ( mod]n psy*ology 7:i* treats m5 simply z bett] or worse pieces ( regi/]+ app>atus & takes no notice ( ! int]nal1 ontog5etic developm5t ( ! m9d72 ,i mean ! idea t 9 y\? we reta9 ! greate/ numb] ( impressions4 ,we mu/ n confuse really exp]i5c$ impressions ) ! m]e mat]ial on :i* to ex]cise memoris+4 ,su* /uff a *ild le>ns m easily simply because x is n weight$ ) m5tal impressions4 ,a psy*ology :i* is oppos$ to exp]i5ce 9 matt]s s fundam5tal mu/ be reject$4 ,:at ,i am attempt+ at pres5t is no m ?an to give ! fa9te/ indication ( t ontog5etic psy*ology or !oretical biography :i* soon] or lat] w replace :at n[ passes = ! sci5ce ( m9d4 ,e programme repres5ts "s def9ite conviction2 be=e we wi% to rea* a goal we h "s def9ite conception ( :at ! goal is to be4 ,! "n 8!oretical biography0 w def9e ! new subject f philosophy & physiology1 & ! biological me?od ( treatm5t introduc$ by ,d>w91 ,sp5c]1 & o!rs w be wid5$ until x becomes a sci5ce capable ( giv+ a rational ord]ly acc\nt ( ! :ole c\rse ( ! m5tal life f ! cradle to ! grave4 ,x is to be call$ biography1 n biology1 because x is to deal ) ! inve/igation ( ! p]man5t laws t rule ! m5tal developm5t ( an individual1 :]eas biology itself conc]ns itself ) individuals !mselves4 ,! new k w seek g5]al po9ts ( view & ! e/abli%m5t ( types4 ,psy*ology mu/ try to become !oretical biography4 ,exi/+ psy*ology w\ld f9d its place 9 ! bran*es ( ! new sci5ce1 & 9 ?is way only w\ld ,wundt's desire to e/abli% ! f\ndations ( a sci5ce ( ! m9d be fulfill$4 ,x w\ld be absurd to despair ( ?is simply because ( ! uselessness ( ! exi/+ sci5ce ( ! m9d :i* has n yet ev5 grasp$ its own object4 ,9 ?is way a ju/ification = exp]im5tal psy*ology might yet be f\nd1 9 spite ( ! important results ( ! inve/igations by ,w9delb& & ,rick]t on ! relation betwe5 natural & psy*ical sci5ce1 or ! old di*otomy betwe5 ! physical & m5tal sci5ces4 ,! relation betwe5 ! cont9uity ( memory & ! desire = immortality is borne out by ! fact t woman is devoid ( ! desire = immortality4 ,x is to be not$ t ^? p]sons are q wrong :o h attribut$ ! desire = immortality to ! fe> ( dea?4 ,wom5 are z mu* afraid ( dea? z are m51 b !y h n ! long+ = immortality4 ,my attempt$ explanation ( ! psy*ological desire = immortality is z yet m an indication ( ! connection betwe5 ! desire & memory ?an a d$uction f a high] natural law4 ,x w always be f\nd t ! connection actually exi/s2 ! m a man lives 9 8 pa/ 7n1 z a sup]ficial read] might guess1 9 8 future7 ! m int5se w be 8 long+ = immortality4 ,! lack ( ! desire = immortality 9 wom5 is to be associat$ ) ! lack 9 !m ( rev]5ce = _! own p]sonality4 ,x seems1 h[ev]1 t ! abs5ce ( bo? rev]5ce & desire = immortality 9 woman is due to a m g5]al pr9ciple1 & 9 ! same fa%ion 9 ! case ( man ! co-exi/5ce ( a high] =m ( memory & ! desire = immortality may be trac$ to "s deep] root4 ,s f>1 ,i h attempt$ only to %[ ! co9cid5ce ( ! two1 h[ ! deep respect = _! own pa/ & ! deep desire = _! own future are to be f\nd 9 ! same individuals4 ,x w n[ be my task to f9d ! common orig9 ( ^! two factors ( ! m9d4 ,let u take z a />t+-po9t :at we 7 able to lay d[n z to ! univ]sality ( ! memory ( great m54 ,to su* ev]y?+ is equally real3 :at took place long ago & ! mo/ rec5t exp]i5ce4 ,?us x happ5s t a s+le exp]i5ce does n end ) ! mom5t ( "t 9 :i* x happ5$1 does n disappe> z ?is mom5t ( "t disappe>s1 b ?r\gh ! memory is wre/$ f ! grasp ( "t4 ,memory makes exp]i5ce timeless2 ! ess5ce ( x is t x %\ld transc5d "t4 ,a man c only rememb] ! pa/ because memory is free f ! control ( "t1 because ev5ts :i* 9 nature are functions ( "t1 9 ! _s h conqu]$ "t4 ,b "h a difficulty crops up4 ,h[ c memory be a negation ( "t if1 on ! o!r h&1 x is c]ta9 t if we _h no memory we %\ld be unconsci\s ( "t8 ,x is c]ta9ly true t we %all always be consci\s ( ! pass+ ( "t by our memory ( ! pa/4 ,if ! two are 9 s intimate a relation h[ c ! "o be ! negation ( ! o!r8 ,! difficulty is easy to resolve4 ,x is j because a liv+ creature--n necess>ily a human be+--by be+ end[$ ) memory is n :olly absorb$ by ! exp]i5ces ( ! mom5t t x c1 s to speak1 oppose itself to "t1 take cognisance ( x1 & make x ! subject ( obs]vation4 ,7 ! be+ :olly ab&on$ to ! exp]i5ce ( ! mom5t & n sav$ f x by memory !n x w\ld *ange ) "t & be a float+ bubble 9 ! /ream ( ev5ts2 x c\ld nev] be consci\s ( "t1 = consci\sness implies duality4 ,! m9d mu/ h transc5d$ "t to grasp x1 x mu/ h /ood outside x 9 ord] to be able to reflect ^u x4 ,?is does n apply m]ely to special mom5ts ( "t1 z1 = in/ance1 to ! case t we _c be consci\s ( sorr[ until ! sorr[ is ov]1 b x is a "p ( ! conception ( "t4 ,if we c\ld n free ourselves f "t1 we c\ld h no k ( "t4 ,9 ord] to und]/& ! condition ( timelessness let u reflect on :at memory rescues f "t4 ,:at transc5ds "t is only :at is ( int]e/ to ! individual1 :at has mean+ = him2 9 fact1 all t he assigns value to4 ,we rememb] only ! ?+s t h "s value = u ev5 if we are unconsci\s ( ! value4 ,x is ! value t creates ! timelessness4 ,we =get ev]y?+ t has no value = u ev5 if we are unconsci\s ( t abs5ce ( value4 ,:at has value1 !n1 is timeless2 or1 to put x ! o!r way1 a ?+ has ! m value ! less x is a function ( "t4 ,9 all ! _w value is 9 proportion to indep5d5ce ( "t2 only ?+s t are timeless h a positive value4 ,al?\gh ?is is n :at ,i take to be ! deepe/ & fulle/ mean+ ( value1 x is1 at lea/1 ! fir/ special law ( ! !ory ( values4 ,a ha/y survey ( common facts w suffice to prove ?is relation betwe5 value & duration4 ,we are always incl9$ to pay little att5tion to ! views ( ^? :om we h kn[n only = a %ort "t1 &1 z a rule1 we ?9k little ( ! ha/y judgm5ts ( ^? :o easily *ange _! ideas4 ,on ! o!r h&1 uncompromis+ fix$ness ga9s respect1 ev5 if x assume ! =m ( v9dictiv5ess or ob/9acy4 ,! re p]5nius ( ! ,roman poets & ! ,egyptian pyramids la/+ = =ty c5turies are fav\rite images4 ,! reputation a man leaves beh9d him w\ld soon be depreciat$ 7 x suspect$ t x w\ld soon disappe> in/ead ( be+ h&$ d[n ! c5turies4 ,a man dislikes to be told t he is always *ang+2 b let x be put t he is simply %[+ new sides ( 8 "* & he w be pr\d ( ! p]man5ce ?r\gh ! *anges4 ,he :o is tir$ ( life1 = :om life has ceas$ to be ( int]e/1 is int]e/+ to no "o4 ,! fe> ( ! ext9ction ( a "n or ( a family is well kn[n4 ,s also /atute laws & cu/oms lose 9 value if _! validity is expressly limit$ 9 "t2 & if two p are mak+ a b>ga91 !y w be ! m ready to di/ru/ "o ano!r if ! b>ga9 is to be only ( %ort duration4 ,9 fact1 ! value t we atta* to ?+s dep5ds to a l>ge ext5t on our e/imate ( _! durability4 ,?is law ( values is ! *ief reason :y m5 are int]e/$ 9 _! dea? & _! future4 ,! desire = value %[s itself 9 ! ef=ts to free ?+s f "t1 & ?is pressure is ex]t$ ev5 9 ! case ( ?+s :i* soon] or lat] mu/ *ange1 z1 = in/ance1 ri*es & position & ev]y?+ t we call ! goods ( ?is _w4 ,"h lies ! psy*ological motive = ! mak+ ( wills & ! be/[al ( prop]ty4 ,! motive is n c>e = relatives1 because a man )\t relatives v (t5 is m anxi\s to settle 8 goods1 n feel+1 p]haps1 l ! head ( a family1 t 9 any ev5t 8 exi/5ce w h "s k9d ( p]man5ce1 t traces ( him w be left aft] 8 own dea?4 ,! great politician or rul]1 & especially ! despot1 ^: rule ends ) 8 dea?1 seeks to increase 8 own value by mak+ x indep5d5t ( "t4 ,he may attempt x ?r\gh a code ( laws or a biography l t ( ,julius ,cs>1 by "s great philosophical und]tak+1 by ! f\nd+ ( museums or collections1 or 7& ?is p]haps is ! fav\rite way7 by alt]ations ( ! cal5d>4 ,& he seeks to ext5d 8 p[] to ! utmo/ dur+ 8 life-"t1 to pres]ve x & make x /able by endur+ contracts & diplomatic m>riages1 & mo/ ( all by attack+ & remov+ ev]y?+ t c\ld endang] ! p]man5ce ( 8 k+dom4 ,& s ! politician becomes a conqu]or4 ,psy*ological & philosophical inve/igations ( ! !ory ( values h neglect$ ! "t elem5t4 ,p]haps ?is is because !y h be5 v mu* "u ! influ5ce ( political economy4 ,i believe1 h[ev]1 t ! application ( my pr9ciple to political economy w\ld be ( consid]able value4 ,v slight reflection w lead "o to see t 9 comm]cial affairs ! "t elem5t is a mo/ important factor 9 e/imat+ value4 ,! common def9ition ( value1 t x is 9 proportion to ! p[] ( ! ?+ valu$ to relieve our wants1 is q incomplete )\t ! elem5t ( "t4 ,su* ?+s z air & wat] h no value only 9 s f> z !y are n localis$ & individualis$2 b z soon z !y h be5 localis$ & individualis$1 & s receiv$ =m1 !y h receiv$ a quality t may n la/1 & ) ! idea ( duration comes ! idea ( value4 ,=m & timelessness1 or individuation & duration1 are ! two factors :i* compose value4 ,?us x c be %[n t ! fundam5tal law ( ! !ory ( value applies bo? to individual psy*ology & to social psy*ology4 ,& n[ ,i c return to :at is1 aft] all1 ! special task ( ?is *apt]4 ,! fir/ g5]al conclusion to be made is t ! desire = timelessness1 a crav+ = value1 p]vades all sph]es ( human activity4 ,& ?is desire = real value1 :i* is deeply b\nd up ) ! desire = p[]1 is completely abs5t 9 ! woman4 ,x is only 9 comp>atively r>e cases t old wom5 tr\ble to make exact directions ab\t ! disposition ( _! prop]ty1 a fact 9 obvi\s relation ) ! abs5ce 9 !m ( ! desire = immortality4 ,ov] ! dispositions ( a man !re is ! weight ( some?+ solemn & impressive--some?+ :i* makes him respect$ by o!r m54 ,! desire = immortality itself is m]ely a specific case ( ! g5]al law t only timeless ?+s h a positive value4 ,on ?is is f\nd$ its connection ) memory4 ,! p]man5ce ) :i* exp]i5ces /ay ) a man is proportional to ! significance :i* !y _h = him4 ,putt+ x 9 a p>adoxical =m1 ,i may say3 ,value is creat$ by ! pa/4 ,only t :i* has a positive value rema9s protect$ by memory f ! jaws ( "t2 & s x may be ) ! individual psy*ical life z a :ole4 ,if x is to h a positive value1 x mu/ n be a function ( "t1 b mu/ subdue "t by et]nal duration aft] physical dea?4 ,?is draws u incomp>ably ne>] ! inn]mo/ motive ( ! desire = immortality4 ,! complete loss ( significance :i* a ri*1 individual1 fully-liv$ life w\ld suff] if x 7 all to end ) dea?1 & ! consequ5t s5selessness ( ev]y?+1 z ,goe! said1 9 o!r words1 to ,eck]mann 7,febru>y #ad1 #ahbi7 lead to ! dem& = immortality4 ,! /ronge/ crav+ = immortality is possess$ by ! g5ius1 & ?is is expla9$ by all ! o!r facts :i* h be5 discuss$ z to 8 nature4 ,memory only fully vanqui%es "t :5 x appe>s 9 a univ]sal =m1 z 9 univ]sal m54 ,! g5ius is ?us ! only timeless man--at lea/1 ?is & no?+ else is 8 ideal ( himself2 he is1 z is prov$ by 8 passionate & urg5t desire = immortality1 j ! man ) ! /ronge/ dem& = timelessness1 ) ! greate/ desire = value4#aa #aa ,x is (t5 a cause = a/oni%m5t t m5 ) q ord9>y1 ev5 vulg>1 natures exp]i5ce no fe> ( dea?4 ,b x is q explicable3 x is n ! fe> ( dea? :i* creates ! desire = immortality1 b ! desire = immortality :i* causes fe> ( dea?4 ,& n[ we are face to face ) an almo/ a/oni%+ co9cid5ce4 ,! timelessness ( ! g5ius w n only be manife/ 9 relation to ! s+le mom5ts ( 8 life1 b also 9 8 relation to :at is kn[n z 88 g5]ation10 or1 9 a n>r[] s5se1 88 "t40 ,z a matt] ( fact1 he has no relations at all ) x4 ,! age does n create ! g5ius x requires4 ,! g5ius is n ! product ( 8 age1 is n to be expla9$ by x1 & we d him no hon\r if we attempt to acc\nt = him by x4 ,c>lyle ju/ly not$ h[ _m epo*s _h call$ = great m51 h[ badly !y _h ne$$ !m1 & h[ !y /ill did n obta9 !m4 ,! com+ ( g5ius rema9s a my/]y1 & m5 rev]5tly ab&on _! ef=ts to expla9 x4 ,& z ! causes ( its appe>ance d n lie 9 any "o age1 s also ! consequ5ces are n limit$ by "t4 ,! a*ievem5ts ( g5ius live = ev]1 & "t _c *ange !m4 ,by 8 works a man ( g5ius is grant$ immortality on ! e>?1 & ?us 9 a ?reefold mann] he has transc5d$ "t4 ,8 univ]sal compreh5sion & memory =bid ! annihilation ( 8 exp]i5ces ) ! pass+ ( ! mom5t 9 :i* ea* occurr$2 8 bir? is indep5d5t ( 8 age1 & 8 "w nev] dies4 ,"h is ! be/ place to consid] a "q :i*1 /rangely en\gh1 appe>s to h receiv$ no att5tion4 ,! "q is1 if !re be any?+ ak9 to g5ius 9 ! _w ( animals & plants8 ,al?\gh x mu/ be admitt$ t exceptional =ms occur among/ animals & plants1 ^! _c be reg>d$ z com+ "u our def9ition ( g5ius4 ,tal5t may exi/ among/ !m z among/ m5 bel[ ! /&>d ( g5ius4 ,b ! special gift1 :at ,moreau1 ,lombroso1 & o!rs h call$ ! 8div9e sp>k10 we mu/ d5y to animals4 ,?is limitation is n jeal\sy nor ! anxi\s gu>d+ ( a privilege1 b is f\nd$ on good gr\nds4 ,is !re any?+ unexpla9$ by ! assumption t ! fir/ appe>ance ( g5ius 0 9 man6 ,9 ! fir/ place1 x is because ( ?is t ! human race has an objective m9d2 9 o!r words1 t man is ! only organism ) a hi/ory4 ,! hi/ory ( ! human race 7naturally ,i mean ! hi/ory ( its m9d & n m]ely ( its w>s7 is readily intelligible on ! !ory ( ! appe>ance ( g5ius1 & ( ! imitation by ! m monkey-l individuals ( ! conduct ( ^? ) g5ius4 ,! *ief /ages1 no d\bt1 7 h\se-build+1 agriculture1 &1 above all1 spee*4 ,e s+le ^w has be5 ! inv5tion ( a s+le man1 z1 inde$1 we /ill see1 if we leave out ( consid]ation ! m]ely te*nical t]ms4 ,h[ else c\ld language h aris58 ,! e>lie/ words 7 8onomatopoetic02 a s\nd simil> to ! excit+ cause 0 evolv$ almo/ )\t ! w ( ! speak]1 9 direct response to ! s5su\s /imulation4 ,all ! o!r words 7 orig9ally metaphors1 or comp>isons1 a k9d ( primitive poetry1 = all prose has come f poetry4 ,_m1 p]haps ! majority ( ! greate/ g5iuses1 h rema9$ unkn[n4 ,?9k ( ! prov]bs1 n[ almo/ commonplaces1 su* z 8"o good turn des]ves ano!r40 ,^! 7 said = ! fir/ "t by "s great man4 ,h[ _m quotations f ! classics1 or say+s ( ,*ri/1 h pass$ into ! common language1 s t we h to ?9k twice be=e we c rememb] :o 7 ! au?ors ( !m4 ,language is z little ! "w ( ! multitude z our ballads4 ,e =m ( spee* owes mu* t is n ackn[l$g$ to individuals ( ano!r language4 ,because ( ! univ]sality ( g5ius1 ! words & phrases t he inv5ts are useful n only to ^? :o use ! language 9 :i* he wrote !m4 ,a nation ori5ts itself by its own g5iuses1 & d]ives f !m its ideas ( its own ideals1 b ! guid+ /> s]ves also z a light to o!r nations4 ,z spee* has be5 creat$ by a few great m51 ! mo/ extraord9>y wisdom lies conceal$ 9 x1 a wisdom :i* reveals itself to a few ard5t explor]s b :i* is usually ov]look$ by ! /upid pr(essional philologi/s4 ,! g5ius is n a critic ( language1 b its creator1 z he is ! creator ( all ! m5tal a*ievem5ts :i* are ! mat]ial ( culture & :i* make up ! objective m9d1 ! _s ( ! peoples4 ,! 8timeless0 m5 are ^? :o make hi/ory1 = hi/ory c be made only by ^? :o are n float+ ) ! /ream4 ,x is only ^? :o are uncondition$ by "t :o h real value1 & ^: productions h an endur+ =ce4 ,& ! ev5ts t become =ces ( culture become s only because !y h an endur+ value4 ,if we make a crit]ion ( g5ius ! exhibition ( ?is ?reefold 8timelessness0 we %all h a measure by :i* x is easy to te/ all claimants4 ,lombroso & ,trck h exp&$ ! popul> view :i* ascribes g5ius to all ^: intellectual or practical a*ievem5ts are mu* above ! av]age4 ,kant & ,s*ell+ h insi/$ on ! m exclusive doctr9e t g5ius c be pr$icat$ only ( ! great creative arti/s4 ,! tru? probably lies betwe5 ! two4 ,i am incl9$ to ?9k t only great arti/s & great philosoph]s 7among/ ! latt]1 ,i include1 above all1 ! great religi\s tea*]s7 h prov$ a claim to g5ius4 ,nei!r ! 8man ( action0 nor 8! man ( sci5ce0 has any claim4 ,m5 ( action1 fam\s politicians & g5]als1 may possess a few traits resembl+ g5ius 7p>ticul>ly a specially good k ( m5 & an enorm\s capacity = rememb]+ p74 ,! psy*ology ( su* traits w be dealt ) lat]2 !y are confus$ ) g5ius only by ^? :om ! ext]nals ( greatness dazzle4 ,! man ( g5ius almo/ typically r5\nces su* ext]nal greatness because ( ! real greatness )9 him4 ,! really great man has ! /ronge/ s5se ( values2 ! di/+ui%$ g5]al is absorb$ by ! desire = p[]4 ,! =m] seeks to l9k p[] ) real value2 ! latt] desires t p[] itself %\ld be valu$4 ,great g5]als & great politicians1 l ! bird ,phnix1 are born out ( fi]y *aos & l x disappe> aga9 9 *aos4 ,! great emp]or or ! great demagogue is ! only man :o lives entirely 9 ! pres5t2 he does n dream ( a m beautiful1 bett] future2 8 m9d does n dwell on 8 own pa/ :i* has already pass$1 & s 9 ! two ways mo/ possible to man1 he does n transc5d "t1 b lives only 9 ! mom5t4 ,! great g5ius does n let 8 "w be det]m9$ by ! concrete f9ite conditions t surr\nd him1 :il/ x is f ^! t ! "w ( ! /atesman takes its direction & its t]m9ation4 ,& s ! great emp]or is no m ?an a ph5om5on ( nature1 :]eas ! g5ius is outside nature & is an incorporation ( ! m9d4 ,! works ( m5 ( action crumble at ! dea? ( _! au?ors1 if inde$ !y h n already decay$1 or !y survive only a brief "t leav+ no traces beh9d !m except :at ! *ronicles record z hav+ be5 done & lat] undone4 ,! emp]or creates no works t survive "t1 pass+ into et]nity2 su* creations come f g5ius4 ,x is ! g5ius 9 reality & n ! o!r :o is ! creator ( hi/ory1 = x is only ! g5ius :o is outside & uncondition$ by hi/ory4 ,! great man has a hi/ory1 ! emp]or is only a "p ( hi/ory4 ,! great man transc5ds "t2 "t creates & "t de/roys ! emp]or4 ,! great man ( sci5ce1 unless he is also a philosoph] 7,i ?9k ( su* names z ,newton & ,gauss1 ,l9nu & ,d>w91 ,cop]nicus & ,galileo71 des]ves ! title ( g5ius z little z ! man ( action4 ,m5 ( sci5ce are n univ]sal2 !y deal only ) a bran* or bran*es ( k4 ,?is is n due1 z is sometimes said1 m]ely to ! extreme mod]n specialisation t makes x impossible to ma/] ev]y?+4 ,ev5 9 ! n9ete5? & tw5tie? c5turies !re are /ill among/ ! le>n$ m5 individuals ) a k z _m-sid$ z t ( ,ari/otle or ,leibnitz2 ! names ( von ,humboldt & ,william ,wundt at once come to my m9d4 ,! abs5ce ( g5ius comes f some?+ mu* m deeply seat$ 9 ! m5 ( sci5ce1 & 9 sci5ce itself1 f a cause :i* ,i %all expla9 9 ! eigh? *apt]4 ,probably "s "o may be dispos$ to argue t if ev5 ! mo/ di/+ui%$ m5 ( sci5ce h n a k s univ]sal z t ( ! philosoph]1 !re are "s :o /& on ! out]mo/ fr+es ( philosophy1 & to :om x is yet difficult to d5y ! ^w g5ius4 ,i ?9k ( su* m5 z ,fi*te1 ,s*lei]ma*]1 ,c>lyle1 & ,nietzs*e4 ,:i* ( ! m]ely sci5tific has felt 9 himself an uncondition$ compreh5sion ( all m5 & ( all ?+s1 or ev5 ! capacity to v]ify any s+le ?+ 9 8 m9d & by 8 m9d8 ,on ! contr>y1 has n ! :ole hi/ory ( ! sci5ce ( ! la/ ?\s& ye>s be5 direct$ aga9/ ?is8 ,?is is ! reason :y m5 ( sci5ce are necess>ily "o-sid$4 ,no man ( sci5ce1 unless he is also a philosoph]1 h[ev] em95t 8 a*ievem5ts1 has t cont9u\s un=gett+ life t ! g5ius exhibits1 & ?is is because ( 8 want ( univ]sality4 ,f9ally1 x is to be obs]v$ t ! inve/igations ( ! sci5tific are always 9 def9ite relation to ! k ( _! day4 ,! sci5tific man takes possession ( a def9ite /ore ( exp]im5tal or obs]v$ k1 increases or alt]s x m or less1 & !n h&s x on4 ,& mu* w be tak5 away f 8 a*ievem5ts1 mu* w sil5tly disappe>2 8 treatises may make a brave %[ 9 ! libr>ies1 b !y cease to be actively alive4 ,on ! o!r h&1 we c ascribe to ! "w ( ! great philosoph]1 z to t ( ! great arti/1 an imp]i%able1 un*angeable pres5tation ( ! _w1 n disappe>+ ) "t1 & :i*1 because x 0 ! expression ( a great m9d1 w always f9d a s*ool ( m5 to adh]e to x4 ,!re /ill exi/ disciples ( ,plato & ,ari/otle1 ( ,sp9oza & ,b]keley & ,bruno1 b !re are n[ none :o d5ote !mselves z foll[]s ( ,galileo or ,helmholtz1 ( ,ptolemy or ,cop]nicus4 ,x is a misuse ( t]ms1 due to errone\s ideas1 to speak ( ! 8classics0 ( sci5ce or ( p$agogy 9 ! s5se t we speak ( ! classics ( philosophy & art4 ,! great philosoph] be>s ! "n ( g5ius des]v$ly & ) hon\r4 ,& if x w always be ! greate/ pa9 to ! philosoph] t he is n an arti/1 s ! arti/ envies ! philosoph] 8 t5aci\s & controll$ /r5g? ( sy/ematic ?\ght1 & x is n surpris+ t ! arti/ has tak5 pleasure 9 depict+ ,prome!us & ,fau/1 ,prosp]a & ,cyprian1 ,paul ! ,apo/le & ,il ,p5s]oso4 ,! philosoph] & ! arti/ are alt]nate sides ( "o ano!r4 ,we mu/ n be too lavi% 9 attribut+ g5ius to ^? :o are philosoph]s or we %all n escape ! reproa* ( be+ m]ely p>tisans ( philosophy aga9/ sci5ce4 ,su* a p>tisan%ip is =eign to my purpose1 &1 ,i hope1 to ?is book4 ,x w\ld only be absurd to discuss ! claims to g5ius ( su* m5 z ,anaxagoras1 ,geul9cx1 ,baad]1 or ,em]son4 ,i d5y g5ius ei!r to su* unorig9ally pr(\nd writ]s z ,angelus ,silesius1 ,philo & ,jacobi1 or to orig9al yet sup]ficial p]sons su* z ,comte1 ,feu]ba*1 ,hume1 ,h]b>t1 ,locke & ,k>neades4 ,! hi/ory ( art is equally full ( prepo/]\s valuations1 :il/1 on ! o!r h&1 ! hi/ory ( sci5ce is extremely free f false e/imations4 ,! hi/ory ( sci5ce busies itself v little ) ! biographies ( its protagoni/s2 its object is a sy/em ( objective1 collective k 9 :i* ! individual is swept away4 ,! s]vice ( sci5ce dem&s ! greate/ sacrifice1 = 9 x ! individual human be+ r5\nces all claim to et]nity z su*4 ,,*apt] ,,vi ,,memory1 ,,logic1 ,,& ,,e?ics ,! title t ,i h giv5 to ?is *apt] at once op5s ! way to mis9t]pretation4 ,x might appe> z if ! au?or support$ ! view t logical & e?ical values 7 ! objects exclusively ( empirical psy*ology1 psy*ical ph5om5a1 l p]ception & s5sation1 & t logic & e?ics1 !re=e1 7 subsections ( psy*ology & bas$ ^u psy*ology4 ,i decl>e at once t ,i call ?is view1 ! s-call$ psy*ologismus1 at once false & injuri\s4 ,x is false because x c lead to no?+2 & injuri\s because1 :ile x h>dly t\*es logic & e?ics1 x ov]?r[s psy*ology itself4 ,! exclusion ( logic & e?ics f ! f\ndations ( psy*ology1 & ! ins]tion ( !m 9 an app5dix1 is "o ( ! results ( ! ov]gr[? ( ! doctr9e ( empirical p]ception1 ( t /range heap ( dead1 fle%less bones :i* is kn[n z empirical psy*ology1 & f :i* all real exp]i5ce has be5 exclud$4 ,i h no?+ to d ) ! empirical s*ool1 & 9 ?is matt] lean t[>ds ! transc5d5talism ( ,kant4 ,z ! object ( my "w1 h[ev]1 is to discov] ! diff]5ces betwe5 diff]5t memb]s ( humanity1 & n to discuss categories t w\ld hold good = ! angels 9 heav51 ,i %all n foll[ ,kant closely1 b rema9 m directly 9 psy*ological pa?s4 ,! ju/ification ( ! title ( ?is *apt] mu/ be rea*$ along o!r l9es4 ,! t$i\s1 because entirely new1 demon/ration ( ! e>li] "p ( my "w has %[n t ! human memory /&s 9 intimate relation ) ?+s hi!rto suppos$ unconnect$ ) x--su* ?+s z "t1 value1 g5ius1 immortality4 ,i h attempt$ to %[ t memory /&s 9 intimate connection ) all ^!4 ,!re mu/ be "s /rong reason = ! complete abs5ce ( e>li] allusions to ?is side ( ! subject4 ,i believe ! reason to be no m ?an ! inadequacy & slov5l9ess :i* hi!rto h spoil$ !ories ( memory4 ,i mu/ "h call att5tion to a !ory fir/ prop\nd$ by ,*>les ,bonnet 9 ! middle ( ! eighte5? c5tury & t[>ds ! end ( ! n9ete5? c5tury1 specially insi/$ ^u by ,ewald ,h]+ & ,e4 ,ma*4 ,?is !ory reg>d$ ! human memory z be+ only a special case ( a prop]ty common to all organis$ matt]1 ! prop]ty t makes ! pa? ( new /imuli r easi] if ^! resemble /imuli t h act$ at "s =m] "t4 ,! !ory really makes ! human memory an adaptation 9 ! s5se ( ,lam>ck1 ! result on ! liv+ organism ( repeat$ /imulation4 ,x is true t !re is a po9t 9 common betwe5 ! human memory & ! increase ( s5sitiv5ess caus$ by ! repeat$ application ( a /imulus2 t id5tical elem5t consi/s 9 ! p]man5ce ( ! effect ( ! fir/ /imulation4 ,!re is1 h[ev]1 a fundam5tal diff]5ce betwe5 ! gr[? ( a muscle t is mu* us$ or ! adaptation ( ! eat] ( ars5ic or morphia to increas$ doses1 & ! recollection ( pa/ exp]i5ces by human be+s4 ,9 ! "o case ! trace ( ! old is j to be felt 9 ! new /imulation2 9 ! o!r case1 by means ( ! consci\sness1 ! old situations are actually reproduc$ ) all _! individuation4 ,! id5tification ( ! two is s sup]ficial t x is a wa/e ( "t to dwell long] on x4 ,! doctr9e ( association z ! !ory ( memory is l9k$ ) ! =ego+ physiological !ory z a matt] ( hi/ory1 ?r\gh ,h>tley1 &1 z a matt] ( fact1 because ! idea ( habit is %>$ by ! two4 ,! association !ory attributes memory to ! me*anical play ( ! l9k+ ( pres5tations accord+ to f\r laws4 ,x ov]looks ! fact t memory 7! cont9u\s memory ( man7 is a function ( ! w4 ,i c rememb] a ?+ if ,i really w4 ,9 ! case ( hypnosis1 :5 ! recollection ( all t has be5 =gott5 is induc$1 an outside w replaces ! w ( ! subject4 ,x is w t sets 9 action ! *a9s ( association1 & we h to deal "h ) some?+ deep] ?an a me*anical pr9ciple4 ,9 ! association psy*ology1 :i* fir/ splits up ! psy*ic life1 & !n va9ly imag9es t x c weld ! re-assort$ pieces toge!r aga91 !re is ano!r confusion1 ! confusion betwe5 memory & recollection1 :i* has p]si/$ 9 spite ( ! well-f\nd$ objections ( ,av5>ius & von ,hffd+4 ,! recognition ( a circum/ance does n necess>ily involve ! special reproduction ( ! =m] impression1 ev5 al?\gh !re seems to be a t5d5cy = ! new impression1 at lea/1 p>tly to recall ! old "o4 ,b !re is ano!r k9d ( recognition1 p]haps z common1 9 :i* ! new impression does n appe> to be directly l9k$ ) an association1 b 9 :i* x comes1 s to speak1 8col\r$0 7,james w\ld say 8t+$07 ) t "* t w\ld be call$ by von ,hffd+ ! 8famili>ity quality40 ,to him :o returns to 8 native place ! roads & /reets seem famili>1 ev5 al?\gh he has =gott5 ! names1 has to ask 8 way1 & c ?9k ( no special occasion on :i* he w5t along !m4 ,a melody may seem 8famili>0 & yet ,i may be unable to say :]e ,i he>d x4 ,! 8"*0 79 ! s5se ( ,av5>ius7 ( famili>ity1 ( intimacy1 hov]s ov] ! s5se-impression itself1 & analysis c detect no associations1 none ( ! fus+ ( ! old & new1 :i*1 accord+ to ! ass]tion ( a presumptu\s pseudo-psy*ology1 produces ! feel+2 ^! cases are q easy to di/+ui% f cases 9 :i* !re is a real al?\gh vague association ) an old] exp]i5ce 9 h5id =m4 ,9 individual psy*ology ?is di/9ction is ( great importance4 ,9 ! highe/ types ( mank9d ! consci\sness ( ! cont9u\s pa/ is pres5t 9 s active a =m t ! mom5t su* a "o sees an acqua9tance 9 ! /reet he is at once able to reproduce ! la/ meet+ z a complete exp]i5ce1 :]eas 9 ! case ( ! less gift$ p]son1 ! feel+ ( famili>ity t makes recognition possible1 occurs :5 he is able to recall ! pa/ connection 9 all its details4 ,if we n[1 9 conclusion1 ask :e!r or no o!r animals ?an man possess a simil> faculty = rememb]+ & reviv+ _! e>li] lives 9 _! entirety x is mo/ probable t ! answ] mu/ be 9 ! negative4 ,animals c\ld n1 z !y d1 rema9 = h\rs at a "t1 motionless & peaceful on "o spot1 if !y 7 capable ( ?9k+ ( ! future or ( rememb]+ ! pa/4 ,animals h ! feel+ ( famili>ity & ! s5se ( expectation 7z we f9d f ! recognition ( 8 ma/] by a dog aft] tw5ty ye>s' abs5ce72 b !y possess no memory & no hope4 ,!y are capable ( recognition ?r\gh ! s5se ( famili>ity1 b !y h no memory4 ,z memory has be5 %[n to be a special "* unconnect$ ) ! l[] sph]es ( psy*ical life1 & ! exclusive prop]ty ( human be+s1 x is n surpris+ t x is closely relat$ to su* high] ?+s z ! idea ( value & ( "t1 & ! crav+ = immortality1 :i* is abs5t 9 animals1 & possible to m5 only 9 s f> z !y possess ! quality ( g5ius4 ,if memory be an ess5tially human ?+1 "p ( ! deepe/ be+ ( humanity1 f9d+ expression 9 mank9d's mo/ peculi> qualities1 !n x w n be surpris+ if memory be also relat$ to ! ph5om5a ( logic & e?ics4 ,i h n[ to explore ?is relation%ip4 ,i may set out f ! old prov]b t li>s h bad memories4 ,x is c]ta9 t ! pa?ological li> has practically no memory4 ,ab\t male li>s ,i %all h m to say2 !y are n common1 h[ev]4 ,b if we rememb] :at 0 said z to ! abs5ce ( memory among/ wom5 we %all n be surpris$ at ! exi/5ce ( ! num]\s prov]bs & common say+s ab\t ! untru?fulness ( wom54 ,x is evid5t t a be+ ^: memory is v slight1 & :o c recall only 9 ! mo/ imp]fect fa%ion :at x has said or done1 or suff]$1 mu/ lie easily if x has ! gift ( spee*4 ,! impulse to untru?fulness w be h>d to resi/ if !re is a practical object to be ga9$1 & if ! influ5ce t comes f a full consci\s reality ( ! pa/ be n pres5t4 ,! impulse to lie is /rong] 9 woman1 because1 unlike t ( man1 h] memory is n cont9u\s1 :il/ h] life is discrete1 unconnect$1 discont9u\s1 sway$ by ! s5sations & p]ceptions ( ! mom5t in/ead ( dom9at+ !m4 ,unlike man1 h] exp]i5ces float pa/ )\t be+ ref]r$1 s to speak1 to a def9ite1 p]man5t c5tre2 %e does n feel h]self1 pa/ & pres5t1 to be "o & ! same ?r\gh\t all h] life4 ,x happ5s almo/ to e man t sometimes he 8does n und]/& himself02 inde$1 ) v _m m51 x happ5s 7leav+ out ( ! "q ! facts ( psy*ical p]iodicity7 t if !y ?9k ov] _! pa/s 9 _! m9ds !y f9d x v difficult to ref] all ! ev5ts to a s+le consci\s p]sonality2 !y d n grasp h[ x c\ld h be5 t !y1 be+ :at !y feel !mselves at ! "t to be1 c\ld ev] h done or felt or ?\ght ?is1 t1 or ! o!r4 ,& yet 9 spite ( ! difficulty1 !y "k t !y _h gone ?r\gh ^! exp]i5ces4 ,! feel+ ( id5tity 9 all circum/ances ( life is q want+ 9 ! true woman1 because h] memory1 ev5 if exceptionally good1 is devoid ( cont9uity4 ,! consci\sness ( id5tity ( ! male1 ev5 al?\gh he may fail to und]/& 8 own pa/1 manife/s itself 9 ! v desire to und]/& t pa/4 ,wom51 if !y look back on _! e>li] lives1 nev] und]/& !mselves1 & d n ev5 wi% to und]/& !mselves1 & ?is reveals itself 9 ! scanty int]e/ !y give to ! attempts ( man to und]/& !m4 ,! woman does n int]e/ h]self ab\t h]self1 & h5ce !re h be5 no female psy*ologi/s1 no psy*ology ( wom5 writt5 by a woman1 & %e is incapable ( grasp+ ! anxi\s desire ( ! man to und]/& ! beg9n+1 middle1 & end ( 8 individual life 9 _! relation to ea* o!r1 & to int]pret ! :ole z a cont9ual1 logical1 necess>y sequ5ce4 ,at ?is po9t !re is a natural transition to logic4 ,a creature l woman1 ! absolute woman1 :o is n consci\s ( h] own id5tity at diff]5t /ages ( h] life1 has no evid5ce ( ! id5tity ( ! subject-matt] ( ?\ght at diff]5t times4 ,if 9 h] m9d ! two /ages ( a *ange _c be pres5t simultane\sly by means ( memory1 x is impossible = h] to make ! comp>ison & note ! *ange4 ,a be+ ^: memory is nev] suffici5tly good z to make x psy*ologically possible to p]ceive id5tity ?r\gh ! lapse ( "t1 s z to enable h]1 = in/ance1 to pursue a quantity ?r\gh a long ma!matical reckon+2 su* a creature 9 ! extreme case w\ld be unable to control h] memory = ev5 ! mom5t ( "t requir$ to say t ,a w be /ill ,a 9 ! next mom5t1 to pron\nce judgm5t on ! id5tity ,a ,a1 or on ! opposite proposition t ,a is n equal to ,a1 = t proposition also requires a cont9u\s memory ( ,a to make ! comp>ison possible4 ,i h be5 mak+ no m]e joke1 no faceti\s sophism or p>adoxical proposition4 ,i ass]t t ! judgm5t ( id5tity dep5ds on conceptions1 nev] on m]e p]ceptions & complexes ( p]ceptions1 & ! conceptions1 z logical conceptions1 are indep5d5t ( "t1 reta9+ _! con/ancy1 :e!r ,i1 z a psy*ological entity1 ?9k !m con/ant or n4 ,b man nev] has a conception 9 ! purely logical =m1 = he is a psy*ological be+1 affect$ by ! condition ( s5sations2 he is able only to =m a g5]al idea 7a typical1 connotative1 repres5tative conception7 out ( 8 individual exp]i5ces by a reciprocal effac+ ( ! diff]5ces & /r5g!n+ ( ! simil>ities1 ?us1 h[ev]1 v closely approximat+ to an ab/ract conception1 & 9 a mo/ wond]ful fa%ion us+ x z su*4 ,he mu/ also be able to pres]ve ?is idea :i* he ?9ks cle>1 al?\gh 9 reality x is confus$1 & x is memory alone t br+s ab\t ! possibility ( t4 ,7 he depriv$ ( memory he w\ld lose ! possibility ( ?9k+ logically1 = ?is possibility is inc>nat$1 s to speak1 only 9 a psy*ological m$ium4 ,memory1 !n1 is a necess>y "p ( ! logical faculty4 ,! propositions ( logic are n condition$ by ! exi/5ce ( memory1 b only ! p[] to use !m4 ,! proposition ,a ,a mu/ h a psy*ological relation to "t1 o!rwise x w\ld be ,at ,at4 ,( c\rse ?is is n ! case 9 pure logic1 b man has no special faculty ( pure logic1 & mu/ act z a psy*ological be+4 ,i h already %[n t ! cont9u\s memory is ! vanqui%] ( "t1 &1 inde$1 is necess>y ev5 = ! idea ( "t to be =m$4 ,& s ! cont9u\s memory is ! psy*ological expression ( ! logical proposition ( id5tity4 ,! absolute woman1 9 :om memory is abs5t1 _c take ! proposition ( id5tity1 or its contradictory1 or ! exclusion ( ! alt]native1 z axiomatic4 ,besides ^! ?ree conditions ( logical ?\ght1 ! f\r? condition1 ! conta9+ ( ! conclusion 9 ! major premiss1 is possible only ?r\gh memory4 ,t proposition is ! gr\ndwork ( ! syllogism4 ,! premisses psy*ologically prec$e ! conclusion1 & mu/ be reta9$ by ! ?9k+ p]son :il/ ! m9or premiss applies ! law ( id5tity or ( non-id5tity4 ,! gr\nds = ! conclusion mu/ lie 9 ! pa/4 ,& = ?is reason cont9uity :i* dom9ates ! m5tal processes ( man is b\nd up ) causality4 ,e psy*ological application ( ! relation ( a conclusion to its premisses implies ! cont9uity ( memory to gu>antee ! id5tity ( ! propositions4 ,z woman has no cont9u\s memory %e c h no pr9cipium rationis suffici5tis4 ,& s x appe>s t woman is )\t logic4 ,george ,simmel has held ?is famili> /atem5t to be errone\s1 inasmu* z wom5 h be5 kn[n to draw conclusions ) ! /ronge/ consi/5cy4 ,t a woman 9 a concrete case c unrel5t+ly pursue a giv5 c\rse at ! /imulation ( "s object is no m a pro( t %e und]/&s ! syllogism1 ?an is h] habit ( p]petually recurr+ to disprov$ argum5ts a pro( t ! law ( id5tity is an axiom = h]4 ,! po9t at issue is :e!r or no !y recognise ! logical axioms z ! crit]ia ( ! validity ( _! ?\ghts1 z ! directors ( _! process ( ?9k+1 :e!r !y make or d n make ^! ! rule ( conduct & ! pr9ciple ( judgm5t4 ,a woman _c grasp t "o mu/ act f pr9ciple2 z %e has no cont9uity %e does n exp]i5ce ! necessity = logical support ( h] m5tal processes4 ,h5ce ! ease ) :i* wom5 assume op9ions4 ,if a woman gives v5t to an op9ion1 or /atem5t1 & a man is s fooli% z to take x s]i\sly & to ask h] = ! pro( ( x1 %e reg>ds ! reque/ z unk9d & (f5sive1 & z impugn+ h] "*4 ,a man feels a%am$ ( himself1 feels himself guilty if he has neglect$ to v]ify a ?\ght1 :e!r or no t ?\ght has be5 utt]$ by him2 he feels ! obligation to keep to ! logical /&>d :i* he has set up = himself4 ,woman res5ts any attempt to require f h] t h] ?\ghts %\ld be logical4 ,%e may be reg>d$ z 8logically insane40 ,! mo/ common defect :i* "o c\ld discov] 9 ! conv]sation ( a woman1 if "o really wi%$ to apply to x ! /&>d ( logic 7a feat t man habitually %uns1 s %[+ 8 contempt = a woman's logic7 is ! quat]nio t]m9orum1 t =m ( equivocation :i* is ! result ( an incapacity to reta9 def9ite pres5tations2 9 o!r words ! result ( a failure to grasp ! law ( id5tity4 ,woman is unaw>e ( ?is2 %e does n realise ! law nor make x a crit]ion ( ?\ght4 ,man feels himself b\nd to logic2 ! woman is )\t ?is feel+4 ,x is only ?is feel+ ( guilt t gu>antees man's ef=ts to ?9k logically4 ,probably ! mo/ pr(\nd say+ ( ,desc>tes1 & yet "o t has be5 widely misund]/ood1 is t all errors are crimes4 ,! s\rce ( all error 9 life is failure ( memory4 ,?us logic & e?ics1 bo? ( :i* deal ) ! fur!rance ( tru? & jo9 9 its highe/ s]vice1 are dep5d5t on memory4 ,! conception dawns on u t ,plato 0 n s f> wrong :5 he connect$ disc]nm5t ) memory4 ,memory1 x is true1 is n a logical & e?ical act1 b x is a logical & e?ical ph5om5on4 ,a man :o has _h a vivid & deep p]ception reg>ds x z a fault1 if "s half-h\r aft]w>ds he is ?9k+ ( some?+ diff]5t1 ev5 if ext]nal influ5ces h int]v5$4 ,a man ?9ks himself unconsci5ti\s & blamewor?y if he notices t he has n ?\ght ( a p>ticul> portion ( 8 life = a long "t4 ,memory1 moreov]1 is l9k$ ) morality1 because x is only ?r\gh memory t rep5tance is possible4 ,all =getfulness is 9 itself immoral4 ,& s rev]5ce is a moral ex]cise2 x is a duty to =get no?+1 & = ?is reason we %\ld rev]5ce ! dead4 ,equally f logical & e?ical motives1 man tries to c>ry logic into 8 pa/1 9 ord] t pa/ & pres5t may become "o4 ,x is ) some?+ ( a %ock t we realise "h t we approa* ! deep connection betwe5 logic & e?ics1 long ago sugge/$ by ,socrates & ,plato1 discov]$ anew by ,kant & ,fi*te1 b lo/ sight ( by liv+ work]s4 ,a creature t _c grasp ! mutual exclusiv5ess ( ,a & n ,a has no difficulty 9 ly+2 m ?an t1 su* a creature has n ev5 any consci\sness ( ly+1 be+ )\t a /&>d ( tru?4 ,su* a creature if end[$ ) spee* w lie )\t kn[+ x1 )\t ! possibility ( kn[+ x2 ,v]itas norma sui et falsa e/4 ,!re is no?+ m upsett+ to a man ?an to f9d1 :5 he has discov]$ a woman 9 a lie1 & has ask$ h]1 8,:y did y lie ab\t x80 t %e simply does n und]/& ! "q1 b simply looks at him & laugh+ly tries to soo! him1 or bur/s into te>s4 ,! subject does n end ) ! "p play$ by memory4 ,ly+ is common en\gh among/ m54 ,& lies c be told 9 spite ( a full remembrance ( ! subject :i* = "s purpose "s "o wi%es to be in=m$ ab\t4 ,inde$1 x might almo/ be said t ! only p]sons :o c lie are ^? :o misrepres5t facts 9 spite ( a sup]ior k & consci\sness ( !m4 ,tru? mu/ fir/ be reg>d$ z ! real value ( logic & e?ics be=e x is correct to speak ( deviations f tru? = special motives z lies f ! moral po9t ( view4 ,^? :o h n ?is high conception %\ld be adjudg$ z guilty r ( vagu5ess & exagg]ation ?an ( ly+2 !y are n immoral b non-moral4 ,& 9 ?is s5se ! woman is non-moral4 ,! root ( su* an absolute misconception ( tru? mu/ lie deep4 ,! cont9u\s memory aga9/ :i* alone a man c be false1 is n ! real s\rce ( ! ef=t = tru?1 ! desire = tru?1 ! basal e?ical-logical ph5om5on1 b only /&s 9 intimate relation ) x4 ,t :i* enables man to h a real relation to tru? & :i* removes 8 temptation to lie1 mu/ be some?+ indep5d5t ( all "t1 some?+ absolutely un*angeable1 :i* z fai?fully reproduces ! old z if x 7 new1 because x is p]man5t itself2 x c only be t s\rce 9 :i* all discrete exp]i5ces unite & :i* creates f ! fir/ a cont9u\s exi/5ce4 ,x is :at produces ! feel+ ( responsibility :i* oppresses all m51 "y & old1 z to _! actions1 :i* makes !m "k t !y are responsible1 :i* leads to ! ph5om5a ( rep5tance & consci\sness ( s91 :i* calls to acc\nt be=e an et]nal & ev] pres5t self ?+s t are long pa/1 its judgm5t be+ subtl] & m compreh5sive ?an t ( any c\rt ( law or ( ! laws ( society1 & :i* is ex]t$ by ! individual himself q indep5d5tly ( all social codes 7s condemn+ ! moral psy*ology :i* w\ld d]ive morality f ! social life ( man74 ,society recognises ! idea ( illegality1 b n ( s92 x presses = puni%m5t )\t wi%+ to produce rep5tance2 ly+ is puni%$ by ! law only 9 its c]emoni\s =m ( p]jury1 & error has nev] be5 plac$ "u its ban4 ,social e?ics ) its conception ( duty to our neighb\r & to society1 & practical exclusion f consid]ation ( ! o!r fifte5 hundr$ million human be+s1 _c ext5d ! realm ( morality1 :5 x beg9s by limit+ x 9 ?is arbitr>y fa%ion4 ,:at is ?is 8c5tre ( app]ception0 t is sup]ior to "t & *ange8 ,x c be no?+ less ?an :at raises man above himself 7z a "p ( ! _w ( s5se7 :i* jo9s him to an ord] ( ?+s t only ! reason c grasp1 & t puts ! :ole _w ( s5se at 8 feet4 ,x is no?+ else ?an p]sonality4 ,! mo/ sublime book 9 ! _w1 ! 8,criticism ( ,practical ,reason10 has ref]r$ morality to an intellig5t ego1 di/9ct f all empirical consci\sness4 ,i mu/ n[ turn to t side ( my subject4 ,,*apt] ,,vii ,,logic1 ,,e?ics ,,& ,,! ,,ego ,david ,hume is well kn[n to h aboli%$ ! conception ( ! ego by see+ 9 x only a bundle ( diff]5t p]ceptions 9 cont9ual ebb & fl[4 ,h[ev] completely ,hume ?\ght himself to h compromis$ ! ego1 at lea/ he expla9$ 8 view relatively mod]ately4 ,he propos$ to say no?+ ab\t a few metaphysicians :o appe>$ to rejoice 9 ano!r k9d ( ego2 = himself he 0 q c]ta9 t he _h none1 & he d>$ to suppose t ! majority ( mank9d1 leav+ ! few peculi> metaphysicians out ( ! "q1 71 l himself1 m]e bundles4 ,s ! polite man express$ himself4 ,9 ! next *apt] ,i %all %[ h[ 8 irony recoils on himself4 ,t 8 view became s fam\s dep5ds p>tly on ! ov]-e/imation 9 :i* ,hume is held & :i* is l>gely due to ,kant4 ,hume 0 a mo/ di/+ui%$ empirical psy*ologi/1 b he _c be reg>d$ z a g5ius1 ! popul> view not)/&+4 ,x is n v mu* to be ! fir/ ( ,engli% philosoph]s1 b ,hume has n ev5 a claim to t position4 ,i d n ?9k t ,kant w\ld h giv5 s mu* praise to ,hume if he _h be5 fully acqua9t$ ) all ,hume's "w & n m]ely ) ! 8,enquiry10 z he c]ta9ly reject$ ! position ( ,sp9oza1 accord+ to :i* m5 7 n 8sub/ances10 b m]ely accid5ts4 ,li*t5b]g1 :o took ! field aga9/ ! ego lat] ?an ,hume1 0 /ill bold]4 ,he is ! philosoph] ( imp]sonality1 & calmly corrects ! conv]sational 8,i ?9k0 into an actual 8x ?9ks02 he reg>ds ! ego z a creation ( ! gramm>ian4 ,9 ?is ,hume _h anticipat$ him1 inasmu* z he also _h decl>$1 at ! end ( 8 analysis1 all disputes z to ! id5tity ( ! p]son to be m]ely a battle ( words4 ,e4 ,ma* has rec5tly repres5t$ ! univ]se z a coh]5t mass1 & ! egos z po9ts 9 :i* ! coh]5t mass has great] consi/5cy4 ,! only realities are ! p]ceptions1 :i* are connect$ 9 "o individual /rongly1 b :i* are weak] 9 ano!r individual :o is ?us diff]5tiat$ f ! fir/4 ,! cont5ts ( ! p]ceptions are ! realities1 & !y p]si/ ext]nally to ! wor?less p]sonal recollections4 ,! ego is n a real b only a practical entity & _c be isolat$1 &1 !re=e1 ! idea ( individual immortality mu/ be reject$4 ,none ! less ! idea ( an ego is n :olly to be reject$2 "h & !re1 z1 = in/ance1 9 ,d>w9's /ruggle = exi/5ce1 x appe>s to h "s validity4 ,x is extraord9>y h[ an inve/igator :o has accompli%$ s mu*1 n only z a hi/orian ( 8 special bran* & z a critic ( ideas1 b :o is also fully equipp$ ) k ( biology1 %\ld h paid no he$ to ! fact t e organic be+ is indivisible f ! fir/1 & is n compos$ ( any?+ l atoms1 monads1 c4 ,! fir/ di/9ctive m>k ( ! liv+ z oppos$ to inorganic matt] is t ! =m] is always diff]5tiat$ into dissimil>1 mutually dep5d5t p>ts1 & is n homog5e\s l a cry/al4 ,& s x %\ld h be5 borne 9 m9d t x 0 at lea/ possible t individuation1 ! fact t organic be+s are n unit$1 l ,siamese tw9s1 w\ld prove to h importance 9 psy*ical matt]s1 & ! ego1 !re=e1 0 m ?an ,ma*'s idea ( x z a m]e wait+-hall ( p]ceptions4 ,x may be t !re exi/s a psy*ical correlation ev5 among/ animals4 ,ev]y?+ t an animal feels & p]ceives has a diff]5t 8note0 or 8col\r0 9 e individual4 ,?is individual quality is n only *>act]i/ic ( ! class1 g5us1 species1 race1 & family1 b also is diff]5t 9 e individual ( ! same family1 c4 ,! idioplasm is ! physiological equival5t ( ?is specific individual quality ( ! s5sations & p]ceptions1 & !re are reasons analog\s ) ^? 9 fav\r ( ! supposition ( an idioplasm = ! supposition ( an individual "* among/ animals4 ,! sportsman :o has to d ) dogs1 ! tra9] ) horses1 & ! keep] ) animals w readily admit ! exi/5ce ( ?is individuality z a con/ant elem5t4 ,x is cle> t we h to d "h ) some?+ m ?an a m]e r5dezv\s ( p]ceptions4 ,b ev5 if ?is psy*ical analogue ( ! idioplasm 7 prov$ to exi/ 9 ! case ( animals1 x c\ld n be rank$ ) ! intelligible "*1 ! exi/5ce ( :i* 9 any liv+ creature except man _c be ma9ta9$4 ,! intelligible "* ( m51 _! individuation1 has ! same relation to empirical "* t memory has to ! simple p[] ( recognition4 ,& f9ally we come to id5tity1 by :i* ! /ructure1 =m1 law1 & cosmos p]si/ ev5 ?r\gh ! *ange ( cont5ts4 ,! consid]ations f :i* is drawn ! pro( ( ! exi/5ce 9 man ( su* a n\m5al1 trans-empirical subject mu/ n[ be /at$ briefly4 ,!y come f logic & e?ics4 ,logic deals ) ! true significance ( ! pr9ciple ( id5tity 7also ) t ( contradiction2 ! exact relation ( ^! two1 & ! v>i\s modes ( /at+ x are controv]sial matt]s outside ! pres5t subject74 ,! proposition ,a ,a is axiomatic & self-evid5t4 ,x is ! primitive measure ( tru? = all o!r propositions2 h[ev] mu* we may ?9k ov] x we mu/ return to ?is fundam5tal proposition4 ,x is ! pr9ciple ( ! di/9ction betwe5 tru? & error2 & he :o reg>ds x z mean+less tautology1 z 0 ! case ) ,hegel & _m ( ! lat] empirici/s 7?is be+ n ! only surpris+ po9t ( contact betwe5 two s*ools app>5tly s diff]5t7 is "r 9 a fa%ion1 b has misund]/ood ! nature ( ! proposition4 ,a ,a1 ! pr9ciple ( all tru?1 _c itself be a special tru?4 ,he :o f9ds ! proposition ( id5tity or t ( non-id5tity mean+less does s by 8 own fault4 ,he mu/ h expect$ to f9d 9 ^! propositions special ideas1 a s\rce ( positive k4 ,b !y are n 9 !mselves k1 sep>ate acts ( ?\ght1 b ! common /&>d = all acts ( ?\ght4 ,& s !y _c be comp>$ ) o!r acts ( ?\ght4 ,! rule ( ! process ( ?\ght mu/ be outside ?\ght4 ,! proposition ( id5tity does n add to our k2 x does n increase b r f\nds a k+dom4 ,! proposition ( id5tity is ei!r mean+less or means ev]y?+4 ,^u :at d ! propositions ( id5tity & ( non-id5tity dep5d8 ,! common view is t !y are judgm5ts4 ,sigw>t1 = in/ance1 :o has rec5tly discuss$ ! matt]1 puts x z foll[s3 ,! two judgm5ts ,a is ,b & ,a is n ,b _c be true at ! same "t because ! judgm5t 8,an unle>n$ man is le>n$0 w\ld involve a contradiction because ! pr$icate 8le>n$0 is affirm$ ( a subject ( :i* ! judgm5t has be5 made implicitly t he is unle>n$1 s t 9 reality two judgm5ts are made1 ,x is le>n$ & ,x is unle>n$4 ,! 8psy*ologismus0 ( ?is me?od ( argum5t is pla94 ,x has rec\rse to a tempor>y judgm5t prec$+ ! =mation ( ! conception 8unle>n$ man40 ,! proposition1 h[ev]1 ,a is n ,a claims validity q ap>t f ! pa/1 pres5t1 or future exi/5ce ( o!r judgm5ts4 ,x dep5ds on ! conception 8unle>n$ man40 ,x makes ! conception m c]ta9 by exclud+ contradictory in/ances4 ,?is1 !n1 gives u ! true function ( ! pr9ciples ( id5tity & non-id5tity4 ,!y are mat]ials = conceptions4 ,?is function conc]ns only logical conceptions1 b n :at h be5 call$ psy*ological conceptions4 ,! conception is always repres5t$ psy*ologically by a g5]alisation2 & ?is pres5tation 9 a c]ta9 fa%ion is includ$ 9 ! conception4 ,! g5]alisation repres5ts ! conception psy*ologically1 b is n id5tical ) x4 ,x c1 s to speak1 be ri*] 7z :5 ,i ?9k ( a triangle7 or x c be poor] 7! conception ( a lion conta9s m ?an my g5]alisation ( lions74 ,! logical conception is ! plumb-l9e :i* ! att5tion tries to foll[2 x is ! goal & pole-/> ( ! psy*ological g5]alisation4 ,pure logical ?\ght _c occur 9 ! case ( m52 x w\ld be an attribute ( deity4 ,a human be+ mu/ always ?9k p>tly psy*ologically because he possesses n only reason b also s5ses1 & 8 ?\ght _c free itself f temporal exp]i5ces b mu/ rema9 b\nd by !m4 ,logic1 h[ev]1 is ! supreme /&>d by :i* ! individual c te/ 8 own psy*ological ideas & ^? ( o!rs4 ,:5 two m5 are discuss+ any?+ x is ! conception & n ! v>y+ individual pres5tations ( x t !y aim at4 ,! conception1 !n1 is ! /&>d ( value = ! individual pres5tations4 ,! mode 9 :i* ! psy*ological g5]alisation comes into exi/5ce is q indep5d5t ( ! conception & has no significance 9 respect to x4 ,! logical "* :i* inve/s ! conception ) dignity & p[] is n d]iv$ f exp]i5ce1 = exp]i5ce c give only vague & wav]+ g5]alisations4 ,absolute con/ancy & absolute coh]5ce :i* _c come f exp]i5ce are ! ess5ce ( ! conception ( t p[] conceal$ 9 ! dep?s ( ! human m9d ^: h&iwork we try h>d b 9 va9 to see 9 nature4 ,conceptions are ! only true realities1 & ! conception is n 9 nature2 x is ! rule ( ! ess5ce n ( ! actual exi/5ce4 ,:5 ,i enunciate ! proposition ,a ,a1 ! mean+ ( ! proposition is n t a special individual ,a ( exp]i5ce or ( ?\ght is l itself4 ,! judgm5t ( id5tity does n dep5d on ! exi/5ce ( an ,a4 ,x means only t if an ,a exi/s1 or ev5 if x does n exi/1 !n ,a ,a4 ,some?+ is posit$1 ! exi/5ce ( ,a ,a :e!r or no ,a itself exi/s4 ,x _c be ! result ( exp]i5ce1 z ,mill suppos$1 = x is indep5d5t ( ! exi/5ce ( ,a4 ,b an exi/5ce has be5 posit$2 x is n ! exi/5ce ( ! object2 x mu/ be ! exi/5ce ( ! subject4 ,! reality ( ! exi/5ce is n 9 ! fir/ ,a or ! second ,a1 b 9 ! simultane\s id5tity ( ! two4 ,& s ! proposition ,a ,a is no o!r ?an ! proposition 8,i am40 ,f ! psy*ological po9t ( view1 ! real mean+ ( ! proposition ( id5tity is n s difficult to int]pret4 ,x is cle> t to be able to say ,a ,a1 to e/abli% ! p]man5ce ( ! conception ?r\gh ! *anges ( exp]i5ce1 !re mu/ be some?+ un*angeable1 & ?is c be only ! subject4 ,7 ,i "p ( ! /ream ( *ange ,i c\ld n v]ify t ! ,a _h rema9$ un*ang$1 _h rema9$ itself4 ,7 ,i "p ( ! *ange1 ,i c\ld n recognise ! *ange4 ,fi*te 0 "r :5 he /at$ t ! exi/5ce ( ! ego 0 to be f\nd conceal$ 9 pure logic1 inasmu* z ! ego is ! condition ( intelligible exi/5ce4 ,! logical axioms are ! pr9ciple ( all tru?4 ,^! posit an exi/5ce t[>ds :i* all cognition s]ves4 ,logic is a law :i* mu/ be obey$1 & man realises himself only 9 s f> z he is logical4 ,he f9ds himself 9 cognition4 ,all error mu/ be felt to be crime4 ,& s man mu/ n err4 ,he mu/ f9d ! tru?1 & s he c f9d x4 ,! duty ( cognition involves ! possibility ( cognition1 ! fre$om ( ?\ght1 & ! hope ( asc]ta9+ tru?4 ,9 ! fact t logic is ! condition ( ! m9d lies ! pro( t ?\ght is free & c rea* its goal4 ,i c treat e?ics briefly & 9 ano!r fa%ion1 inasmu* z :at ,i h to say is f\nd$ on ,kant's moral philosophy4 ,! deepe/1 ! intelligible1 "p ( ! nature ( man is t "p :i* does n take refuge 9 causality1 b :i* *ooses 9 fre$om ! good or ! bad4 ,?is is manife/ 9 consci\sness ( s9 & 9 rep5tance4 ,no "o has attempt$ to expla9 ^! facts o!rwise2 & no "o all[s himself to be p]suad$ t he mu/ commit ?is or t act4 ,9 ! %all !re lies ! possibility ( ! c4 ,! causal det]m9+ factors1 ! l[] motives t act ^u him1 he is fully aw>e (1 b he rema9s consci\s ( an intelligible ego free to act 9 a diff]5t way f o!r egos4 ,tru?1 purity1 fai?fulness1 uprightness1 ) ref]5ce to oneself2 ^! give ! only conceivable e?ics4 ,duty is only duty to oneself1 duty ( ! empirical ego to ! intelligible ego4 ,^! appe> 9 ! =m ( two imp]atives t w always put to %ame e k9d ( psy*ologismus--! logical law & ! moral law4 ,! int]nal direction1 ! categorical imp]atives ( logic & morality :i* dom9ate all ! codes ( social utilit>ianism are factors t no empiricism c expla94 ,all empiricism & scepticism1 positivism & relativism1 in/9ctively feel t _! pr9cipal difficulties lie 9 logic & e?ics4 ,& s p]petually r5ew$ & fruitless ef=ts are made to expla9 ?is inw>d discipl9e empirically & psy*ologically4 ,logic & e?ics are fundam5tally ! same1 !y are no m ?an duty to oneself4 ,!y celebrate _! union by ! highe/ s]vice ( tru?1 :i* is ov]%ad[$ 9 ! "o case by error1 9 ! o!r by untru?4 ,all e?ics are possible only by ! laws ( logic1 & logic is no m ?an ! e?ical side ( law4 ,n only virtue1 b also insight1 n only sanctity b also wisdom1 are ! duties & tasks ( mank9d4 ,?r\gh ! union ( ^! alone comes p]fection4 ,e?ics1 h[ev]1 ! laws ( :i* are po/ulates1 _c be made ! basis ( a logical pro( ( exi/5ce4 ,e?ics are n logical 9 ! same s5se t logic is e?ical4 ,logic proves ! absolute actual exi/5ce ( ! ego2 e?ics control ! =m :i* ! actuality assumes4 ,e?ics dom9ate logic & make logic "p ( _! cont5ts4 ,9 ?9k+ ( ! fam\s passage 9 ! 8,critique ( ,practical ,reason10 :]e ,kant introduces man z a "p ( ! intelligible cosmos1 x may be ask$ h[ ,kant assur$ himself t ! moral law 0 inh]5t 9 p]sonality4 ,! answ] ,kant gave 0 simply t no o!r & no nobl] orig9 c\ld be f\nd = x4 ,he goes no fur!r ?an to say t ! categorical imp]ative is ! law ( ! n\m5on1 belong+ to x & inh]5t 9 x f ! beg9n+4 ,t1 h[ev]1 is ! nature ( e?ics4 ,e?ics make x possible = ! intelligible ego to act free f ! %ackles ( empiricism1 & s ?r\gh e?ics1 ! exi/5ce ( ^: possibilities logic assures u1 is able to become actual 9 all its purity4 ,!re rema9s a mo/ important po9t 9 :i* ! ,kantian sy/em is (t5 misund]/ood4 ,x reveals itself pla9ly 9 e case ( wrong-do+4 ,duty is only t[>ds oneself2 ,kant mu/ h realis$ ?is 9 8 e>li] days :5 fir/ he felt an impulse to lie4 ,except = a few indications 9 ,nietzs*e1 & 9 ,/irn]1 & a few o!rs1 ,ibs5 alone seems to h grasp$ ! pr9ciple ( ! ,kantian e?ics 7notably 9 8,br&0 & 8,pe] ,gynt074 ,! foll[+ two quotations also give ! ,kantian view 9 a g5]al way3 ,fir/ ,hebbel's epigram1 8,lies & ,tru?40 8,:i* d y pay de>] =1 lies or ! tru?8 ,! =m] co/s y y\rself1 ! latt] at mo/ y\r happ9ess40 ,next1 ! well-kn[n words ( ,sleika f ! 8,we//li*5 ,diwan03 ,all sorts g to make a _w1 ,! cr[d & ! rogue & ! h]o2 ,b ! highe/ =tune ( e>?'s *ildr5 ,is always 9 _! own p]sonality4 ,x matt]s little h[ a man lives ,if only he is true to himself2 ,x matt]s no?+ :at a man may lose ,if he rema9s :at he really is4 ,x is c]ta9ly true t mo/ m5 ne$ "s k9d ( a ,god4 ,a few1 & !y are ! m5 ( g5ius1 d n b[ to an ali5 law4 ,! re/ try to ju/ify _! do+s & misdo+s1 _! ?9k+ & exi/5ce 7at lea/ ! m5tal side ( x71 to "s "o else1 :e!r x be ! p]sonal ,god ( ! ,jews1 or a belov$1 respect$1 & rev]$ human be+4 ,x is only 9 ?is way t !y c br+ _! lives "u ! social law4 ,kant 0 p]meat$ ) 8 conviction1 z is conspicu\s 9 ! m9ute/ details ( 8 *os5 life-"w1 t man 0 responsible only to himself1 to su* an ext5t t he reg>d$ ?is side ( 8 !ory z self-evid5t & lea/ likely to be disput$4 ,?is sil5ce ( ,kant has br\ght ab\t a misund]/&+ ( 8 e?ics--! only e?ics t5able f ! psy*ologically introspective /&po9t1 ! only sy/em accord+ to :i* ! insi/5t /rong inn] voice ( ! "o is to be he>d ?r\gh ! noise ( ! _m4 ,i ga!r f a passage 9 8 8,an?ropology0 t ev5 9 ! case ( ,kant "s incid5t 9 8 actual e>?ly life prec$$ ! 8=mation ( 8 "*40 ,! bir? ( ! ,kantian e?ics1 ! noble/ ev5t 9 ! hi/ory ( ! _w1 0 ! mom5t :5 = ! fir/ "t ! dazzl+ awful conception came to him1 8,i am responsible only to myself2 ,i mu/ foll[ none o!r2 ,i mu/ n =get myself ev5 9 my "w2 ,i am alone2 ,i am free2 ,i am "l ( myself40 8,two ?+s fill my m9d ) ev] r5ew$ wond] & awe ! m (t5 & ! deep] ,i dwell on !m--! />ry vault above me & ! moral law )9 me4 ,i mu/ n look on !m bo? z veil$ 9 my/]y or ?9k t _! maje/y places !m beyond me4 ,i see !m be=e me1 & !y are "p ( ! consci\sness ( my exi/5ce4 ,! fir/ arises f my position 9 ! out] _w ( ! s5ses1 & l9ks me ) ! immeasurable space 9 :i* worlds & worlds & sy/ems & sy/ems1 al?\gh 9 immeasurable "t1 h _! ebbs & fl[s1 _! beg9n+s & ends4 ,! second arises f my invisible self1 my p]sonality1 & places me 9 a _w t has true inf9ity1 b :i* is evid5t only to ! reason & ) :i* ,i recognise myself z be+ b\nd1 n accid5tally z 9 ! o!r case b 9 a univ]sal & necess>y union4 ,on ! "o h&1 ! consci\sness ( an endless s]ies ( worlds de/roys my s5se ( importance1 mak+ me only "o ( ! animal creatures :i* mu/ return its sub/ance aga9 to ! planet 7t1 too1 be+ no m ?an a po9t 9 space7 f :5ce x came1 aft] hav+ be5 9 "s unkn[n way end[$ ) life = a brief space4 ,! second po9t ( view enhances my importance1 makes me an intellig5ce1 inf9ite & uncondition$ ?r\gh my p]sonality1 ! moral law 9 :i* sep>ates me f ! animals & f ! _w ( s5se1 removes me f ! limits ( "t & space1 & l9ks me ) inf9ity40 ,! secret ( ! critique ( practical reason is t man is alone 9 ! _w1 9 trem5d\s et]nal isolation4 ,he has no object outside himself2 lives = no?+ else2 he is f> remov$ f be+ ! slave ( 8 wi%es1 ( 8 abilities1 ( 8 necessities2 he /&s f> above social e?ics2 he is alone4 ,?us he becomes "o & all2 he has ! law 9 him1 & s he himself is ! law1 & no m]e *ang+ caprice4 ,! desire is 9 him to be only ! law1 to be ! law t is himself1 )\t aft]?\ght or =e?\ght4 ,?is is ! awful conclusion1 he has no long] ! s5se t !re c be duty = him4 ,no?+ is sup]ior to him1 to ! isolat$ absolute unity4 ,b !re are no alt]natives = him2 he mu/ respond to 8 own categorical imp]atives1 absolutely1 imp>tially4 8,fre$om10 he cries 7= in/ance1 ,wagn]1 or ,s*op5hau]71 8re/1 peace f ! enemy2 peace1 n ?is endless /riv+02 & he is t]rifi$4 ,ev5 9 ?is wi% = fre$om !re is c[>dice2 9 ! ignom9i\s lam5t !re is des]tion z if he 7 too small = ! fight4 ,:at is ! use ( x all1 he cries to ! univ]se2 & is at once a%am$1 = he is dem&+ happ9ess1 & t 8 own burd5 %\ld re/ on o!r %\ld]s4 ,kant's lonely man does n dance or laugh2 he nei!r brawls nor makes m]ry2 he feels no ne$ to make a noise1 because ! univ]se is s sil5t ar\nd him4 ,to acquiesce 9 8 lonel9ess is ! spl5did supremacy ( ! ,kantian4 ,,*apt] ,,viii ,,! 8,i0 ,,problem ,,& ,,g5ius 8,9 ! beg9n+ ! _w 0 no?+ b ! tman1 9 ! =m ( a man4 ,x look$ ar\nd & saw no?+ diff]5t to itself4 ,!n x cri$ out once1 #8,x is ,i4' ,t is h[ ! ^w #8,i' came to be4 ,t is :y ev5 at ! pres5t day1 if any "o is call$1 he answ]s1 #8,x is ,i1' & !n recalls 8 o!r "n1 ! "o he be>s40--7,brihadranyata-,upani%ad47 ,_m disputations ab\t pr9ciples 9 psy*ology arise f individual *>act]ological diff]5ces 9 ! disputants4 ,?us1 9 ! mode t ,i h already sugge/$1 *>act]ology might play an important "p4 ,:5 "o p]son ?9ks to h discov]$ ?is1 ! o!r t1 by introspection1 *>act]ology w\ld h to %[ :y ! results 9 ! "o case %\ld diff] f ^? 9 ! o!r1 or1 at lea/1 to po9t out 9 :at o!r respects ! p]sons 9 "q 7 unlike4 ,i see no o!r possible way ( cle>+ up ! disput$ po9ts ( psy*ology4 ,psy*ology is a sci5ce ( exp]i5ces1 &1 !re=e1 x mu/ proce$ f ! individual to ! g5]al1 & n1 z 9 ! supra-individuali/ic laws ( logic & e?ics1 proce$ f ! univ]sal to ! individual case4 ,!re is no su* ?+ z an empirical g5]al psy*ology2 & x w\ld be a mi/ake to approa* su* )\t hav+ fully reckon$ ) diff]5tial psy*ology4 ,x is a great pity t psy*ology has be5 plac$ betwe5 philosophy & ! analysis ( p]ceptions4 ,f :i*ev] side psy*ologi/s approa*$ ! subject1 !y h always be5 assur$ ( ! g5]al validity ( _! results4 ,p]haps ev5 s fundam5tal a "q z to :e!r or no p]ception itself implies an actual & spontane\s act ( consci\sness _c be solv$ )\t a consid]ation ( *>act]ological diff]5ces4 ,! purpose ( ?is "w is to apply *>act]ology to ! solution ( a few ( ^! d\btful matt]s1 ) special ref]5ce to ! di/9ctions betwe5 ! sexes4 ,! diff]5t conceptions ( ! ,i-problem1 h[ev]1 dep5d n s mu* on diff]5ces ( sex z on diff]5ces 9 gift$ness4 ,! dispute betwe5 ,hume & ,kant receives its *>act]ological explanation mu* 9 ! same way z if ,i 7 to di/+ui% two m5 9 s f> z ! "o held 9 ! highe/ e/eem ! works ( ,mak>t & ,g\nod1 ! o!r ^? ( ,rembr&t & ,bee?ov54 ,i w\ld simply di/+ui% ! two by _! gift$ness4 ,s also ! judgm5ts ab\t ! 8,i0 mu/ be v diff]5t 9 ! cases ( diff]5tly gift$ m54 ,!re h be5 no truly great m5 :o 7 n p]suad$ ( ! exi/5ce ( ! 8,i02 a man :o d5ies x _c be a great man4 ,9 ! c\rse ( ! foll[+ pages ?is proposition w be tak5 z absolutely b9d+1 & w be us$ really z a means ( valu+ g5ius4 ,!re has be5 no fam\s man :o1 at lea/ "s "t 9 ! c\rse ( 8 life1 & g5]ally e>li] 9 proportion to 8 greatness1 has n _h a mom5t 9 :i* he 0 absolutely conv9c$ ( ! possession ( an ego 9 ! highe/ s5se4 ,let u comp>e ! foll[+ utt]ances ( ?ree v great g5iuses4 ,jean ,paul relates 9 8 autobiographical sket*1 8,tru?s f my own ,life03 8,i c nev] =get a circum/ance :i*1 s f>1 has be5 relat$ by no "o--! bir? ( my own self-consci\sness1 ! "t & place ( :i* ,i c tell4 ,"o morn+ ,i 0 /&+1 z a v "y *ild1 at ! front door1 & look+ t[>ds ! wood-%$ ,i sudd5ly saw1 all at once my inn] lik5ess4 #8,i' am #8,i' fla%$ l lightn+ f ! skies across me1 & s9ce !n has rema9$4 ,i saw myself !n = ! fir/ "t & = ev]4 ,?is _c be expla9$ z a confusion ( memory1 = no ali5 n>rative c\ld h bl5d$ itself ) ?is sacr$ ev5t1 pres]v$ p]man5tly 9 my memory by its vividness & novelty40 ,novalis1 9 8 8,miscellane\s ,fragm5ts10 ref]s to an id5tical exp]i5ce3 8,?is factor e "o mu/ exp]i5ce = himself4 ,x is a factor ( ! high] ord]1 & reveals itself only to high] m52 b m5 %\ld /rive to induce x 9 !mselves4 ,philosophy is ! ex]cise ( ?is factor1 x is a true self-revelation1 ! /imulation ( ! real ego by ! ideal ego4 ,x is ! f\ndation ( all o!r revelations2 ! resolution to philosophise is a *all5ge to ! actual ego1 to become consci\s ( itself1 to gr[ & to become a s\l40 ,s*ell+ discusses ! same ph5om5on 9 8 8,philosophical ,lett]s ^u ,dogmatism & ,criticism10 a little kn[n e>ly "w1 9 :i* occur ! foll[+ beautiful words3 8,9 all ( u !re dwells a secret m>vell\s p[] ( free+ ourselves f ! *anges ( "t1 ( )draw+ to our secret selves away f ext]nal ?+s1 & ( s discov]+ to ourselves ! et]nal 9 u 9 ! =m ( un*angeability4 ,?is pres5tation ( ourselves to ourselves is ! mo/ truly p]sonal exp]i5ce ^u :i* dep5ds ev]y?+ t we "k ( ! supra-s5sual _w4 ,?is pres5tation %[s u = ! fir/ "t :at real exi/5ce is1 :il/ all else only appe>s to be4 ,x diff]s f e pres5tation ( ! s5se 9 its p]fect fre$om1 :il/ all o!r pres5tations are b\nd1 be+ ov]weight$ by ! burd5 ( ! object4 ,/ill !re exi/s = ^? :o h n ?is p]fect fre$om ( ! inn] s5se "s approa* to x1 exp]i5ces approa*+ x f :i* !y may ga9 "s fa9t idea ( x4444 ,?is intellectual pres5tation occurs :5 we cease to be our own object1 :51 )draw+ into ourselves1 ! p]ceiv+ self m]ges 9 ! self-p]ceiv$4 ,at t mom5t we annihilate "t & duration ( "t2 we are no long] 9 "t1 b "t1 or r et]nity itself1 is 9 u4 ,! ext]nal _w is no long] an object = u1 b is lo/ 9 u40 ,! positivi/ w p]haps only laugh at ! self-deceiv$ deceiv]1 ! philosoph] :o ass]ts t he has _h su* exp]i5ces4 ,well1 x is n easy to prev5t x4 ,x is also unnecess>y4 ,b ,i am by no means ( ! op9ion t ?is 8factor ( a high] ord]0 plays ! same "p 9 all m5 ( g5ius ( a my/ical id5tity ( subject & object z ,s*ell+ describes x4 ,:e!r !re are undivid$ exp]i5ces 9 :i* ! dualism ( actual life is ov]come1 z is indicat$ by ,plot9 & ! ,indian ,mahatmas1 or :e!r ?is is only ! highe/ int5sification ( exp]i5ce1 b 9 pr9ciple simil> to all o!rs--does n signify "h1 ! co9cid5ce ( subject & object1 ( "t & et]nity1 ! repres5t+ ( ,god ?r\gh liv+ m51 w nei!r be demon/rat$ z possible nor d5i$ z impossible4 ,! exp]i5c+ ( "o's own 8,i0 is n to be begun by !oretical k1 & no "o has ev]1 s f>1 tri$ to put x 9 ! position ( a sy/ematic philosophy4 ,i %all1 !re=e1 n call ?is factor ( a high] ord]1 :i* manife/s itself 9 "s m5 9 "o way & 9 o!r m5 9 ano!r way1 an ess5tial manife/ation ( ! true ego1 b only a phase ( x4 ,e great man kn[s ?is phase ( ! ego4 ,he may become consci\s ( x fir/ ?r\gh ! love ( a woman1 = ! great man loves m int5sely ?an ! ord9>y man2 or x may be f ! contra/ giv5 by a s5se ( guilt or ! k ( hav+ fail$2 ^!1 too1 ! great man feels m int5sely ?an small]-m9d$ p4 ,x may lead him to a s5se ( unity ) ! all1 to ! see+ ( all ?+s 9 ,god1 or1 & ?is is m likely1 x may reveal to him ! frightful dualism ( nature & _s 9 ! univ]se1 & produce 9 him ! ne$1 ! crav+1 = a solution ( x1 = ! secret inn] wond]4 ,b always x leads ! great man to ! beg9n+ ( a pres5tation ( ! _w = himself & by himself1 )\t ! help ( ! ?\ght ( o!rs4 ,?is intuitive vision ( ! _w is n a great syn!sis elaborat$ at 8 writ+-table 9 8 libr>y f all ! books t h be5 writt52 x is some?+ t has be5 exp]i5c$1 & z a :ole x is cle> & intelligible1 al?\gh details may /ill be obscure & contradictory4 ,! excitation ( ! ego is ! only s\rce ( ?is intuitive vision ( ! _w z a :ole 9 ! case ( ! arti/ z 9 t ( ! philosoph]4 ,&1 h[ev] diff]5t !y may be1 if !y are really intuitive visions ( ! cosmos1 !y h ?is 9 common1 some?+ t comes only f ! excitation ( ! ego1 ! fai? t e great man possesses1 ! conviction ( 8 possession ( an 8,i0 or s\l1 :i* is solit>y 9 ! univ]se1 :i* faces ! univ]se & compreh5ds x4 ,f ! "t ( ?is fir/ excitation ( 8 ego1 ! great man1 9 spite ( lapses due to ! mo/ t]rible feel+1 ! feel+ ( mortality1 w live 9 & by 8 s\l4 ,& x is = ?is reason1 z well z f ! s5se ( 8 creative p[]s1 t ! great man has s int5se a self-consci\sness4 ,no?+ c be m un9tellig5t ?an to talk ( ! mode/y ( great m51 ( _! inability to recognise :at is )9 !m4 ,!re is no great man :o does n well "k h[ f> he diff]s f o!rs 7except dur+ ^! p]iodical fits ( depression to :i* ,i h already allud$74 ,e great man feels himself to be great z soon z he has creat$ some?+2 8 vanity & ambition are1 9 fact1 always s great t he ov]-e/imates himself4 ,s*op5hau] believ$ himself to be great] ?an ,kant4 ,nietzs*e decl>$ t 8,?us spake ,z>a?u/ra0 0 ! greate/ book 9 ! _w4 ,!re is1 h[ev]1 a side ( tru? 9 ! ass]tion t great m5 are mode/4 ,!y are nev] arrogant4 ,arrogance & self-realisation are contradictories1 & %\ld nev] be confus$ al?\gh ?is is (t5 done4 ,a man has j z mu* arrogance z he lacks ( self-realisation1 & uses x to increase 8 own self-consci\sness by artificially l[]+ 8 e/imation ( o!rs4 ,( c\rse ! =ego+ holds true only ( :at may be call$ physiological1 unconsci\s arrogance2 ! great man mu/ occasionally comport himself ) :at seems rud5ess to contemptible p]sons4 ,all great m51 !n1 h a conviction1 really indep5d5t ( ext]nal pro(1 t !y h a s\l4 ,! absurd fe> mu/ be laid aside t ! s\l is a hyp]empirical reality & t belief 9 x leads u to ! position ( ! !ologi/s4 ,belief 9 a s\l is any?+ r ?an a sup]/ition & is no m]e h&maid ( religi\s sy/ems4 ,arti/s speak ( _! s\ls al?\gh !y h n /udi$ philosophy or !ology2 a!i/s l ,%elley use ! expression & "k v well :at !y mean by x4 ,o!rs h sugge/$ t ! 8s\l0 is only a beautiful empty ^w1 :i* p ascribe to o!rs )\t hav+ felt its ne$ = !mselves4 ,?is is l say+ t great arti/s use symbols to express ! highe/ =m ( reality )\t be+ assur$ z to ! exi/5ce ( t reality4 ,! m]e empirici/ & ! pure physiologi/ no d\bt w consid] t all ?is is nons5se1 & t ,lucretius is ! only great poet4 ,no d\bt !re has be5 mu* misuse ( ! ^w1 b if great arti/s speak ( _! s\l !y "k :at !y are ab\t4 ,arti/s1 l philosoph]s1 "k well :5 !y approa* ! greate/ possible reality1 b ,hume _h no s5se ( ?is4 ,! sci5tific man ranks1 z ,i h already said1 & z ,i %all pres5tly prove1 bel[ ! arti/ & ! philosoph]4 ,! two latt] may e>n ! title ( g5ius :i* mu/ always be d5i$ to ! sci5tific man4 ,)\t any good reason hav+ be5 assign$ = x1 x has usually be5 ! case t ! voice ( g5ius on any p>ticul> problem is li/5$ to be=e ! voice ( sci5ce4 ,is !re ju/ice 9 ?is pref]5ce8 ,c ! g5ius expla9 ?+s z to :i* ! man ( sci5ce1 z su*1 c say no?+8 ,c he pe] into dep?s :]e ! man ( sci5ce is bl9d8 ,! conception g5ius concludes univ]sality4 ,if !re 7 an absolute g5ius 7a conv5i5t fiction7 !re w\ld be no?+ to :i* he c\ld n h a vivid1 intimate1 & complete relation4 ,g5ius1 z ,i h already %[n1 w\ld h univ]sal compreh5sion1 & ?r\gh its p]fect memory w\ld be indep5d5t ( "t4 ,to compreh5d any?+ "o mu/ h )9 "o some?+ simil>4 ,a man notices1 und]/&s1 & compreh5ds only ^? ?+s ) :i* he has "s k9%ip4 ,! g5ius is ! man ) ! mo/ int5se1 mo/ vivid1 mo/ consci\s1 mo/ cont9u\s1 & mo/ individual ego4 ,! ego is ! c5tral po9t1 ! unit ( compreh5sion1 ! syn!sis ( all manifoldness4 ,! ego ( ! g5ius accord+ly is simply itself univ]sal compreh5sion1 ! c5tre ( inf9ite space2 ! great man conta9s ! :ole univ]se )9 himself2 g5ius is ! liv+ microcosm4 ,he is n an intricate mosaic1 a *emical comb9ation ( an inf9ite numb] ( elem5ts2 ! argum5t 9 *ap4 iv4 z to 8 relation to o!r m5 & ?+s mu/ n be tak5 9 t s5se2 he is ev]y?+4 ,9 him & ?r\gh him all psy*ical manife/ations coh]e & are real exp]i5ces1 n an elaborate piece-"w1 a :ole put toge!r f p>ts 9 ! fa%ion ( sci5ce4 ,= ! g5ius ! ego is ! all1 lives z ! all2 ! g5ius sees nature & all exi/5ces z :ole2 ! relations ( ?+s fla% on him intuitively2 he has n to build bridges ( /ones betwe5 !m4 ,& s ! g5ius _c be an empirical psy*ologi/ sl[ly collect+ details & l9k+ !m by associations2 he _c be a physici/1 envisag+ ! _w z a comp\nd ( atoms & molecules4 ,x is absolutely f 8 vision ( ! :ole1 9 :i* ! g5ius always lives1 t he gets 8 s5se ( ! p>ts4 ,he values ev]y?+ )9 him or )\t him by ! /&>d ( ?is vision1 a vision t = him is no function ( "t1 b a "p ( et]nity4 ,& s ! man ( g5ius is ! pr(\nd man1 & pr(\nd only 9 proportion to 8 g5ius4 ,t is :y 8 views are m valuable ?an ^? ( all o!rs4 ,he con/ructs f ev]y?+ 8 ego t holds ! univ]se1 :il/ o!rs nev] rea* a full consci\sness ( ?is inn] self1 & s1 = him1 all ?+s h significance1 all ?+s are symbolical4 ,= him brea?+ is some?+ m ?an ! com+ & go+ ( gases ?r\gh ! walls ( ! capill>ies2 ! blue ( ! sky is m ?an ! p>tial pol>isation ( diffus$ & reflect$ light2 snakes are n m]ely reptiles t h lo/ limbs4 ,if x 7 possible = "o s+le man to h a*iev$ all ! sci5tific discov]ies t h ev] be5 made1 if ev]y?+ t has be5 done by ! foll[+3 ,ar*im$es & ,lagrange1 ,johannes ,mll] & ,k>l ,ern/ von ,ba]1 ,newton & ,laplace1 ,konrad ,spr5gel & ,cuvi]1 ,?ucydides & ,niebuhr1 ,fri$ri* ,augu/ ,wolf & ,franz ,bopp1 & by _m m fam\s m5 ( sci5ce1 c\ld h be5 a*iev$ by "o man 9 ! %ort span ( human life1 he w\ld /ill n be entitl$ to ! d5om9ation ( g5ius1 = none ( ^! h pi]c$ ! dep?s4 ,! sci5ti/ takes ph5om5a = :at !y obvi\sly are2 ! great man or ! g5ius = :at !y signify4 ,sea & m\nta91 light & d>kness1 spr+ & autumn1 cypress & palm1 dove & swan are symbols to him1 he n only ?9ks t !re is1 b he recognises 9 !m some?+ deep]4 ,! ride ( ! ,valkyrie is n produc$ by atmosph]ic pressure & ! magic fire is n ! outcome ( a process ( oxidation4 ,& all ?is is possible = him because ! out] _w is z full & /rongly connect$ z ! inn] 9 him1 ! ext]nal _w 9 fact seems to be only a special aspect ( 8 inn] life2 ! univ]se & ! ego h become "o 9 him1 & he is n oblig$ to set 8 exp]i5ce toge!r piece by piece accord+ to rule4 ,! greate/ poly-hi/orian1 on ! contr>y1 does no?+ b add bran* to bran* & yet creates no complet$ /ructure4 ,t is ano!r reason :y ! great sci5ti/ is l[] ?an ! great arti/1 ! great philosoph]4 ,! inf9ity ( ! univ]se is respond$ to 9 ! g5ius by a true s5se ( inf9ity 9 8 own brea/2 he holds *aos & cosmos1 all details & all totality1 all plurality1 & all s+ul>ity 9 himself4 ,al?\gh ^! rem>ks apply m to g5ius ?an to ! nature ( ! productions ( g5ius1 al?\gh ! occurr5ce ( arti/ic ec/asy1 philosophic conceptions1 religi\s f]v\r rema9 z puzzl+ z ev]1 if m]ely ! conditions1 n ! actual process ( a really great a*ievem5t has be5 made cle>]1 yet ?is is nev]!less to be ! f9al def9ition ( g5ius3 ,a man may be call$ a g5ius :5 he lives 9 consci\s connection ) ! :ole univ]se4 ,x is only !n t ! g5ius becomes ! really div9e sp>k 9 mank9d4 ,! great idea ( ! s\l ( man z ! microcosm1 ! mo/ important discov]y ( ! philosophy ( ! ,r5aissance--al?\gh traces ( ! idea are to be f\nd 9 ,plato & ,ari/otle--appe>s to be q disreg>d$ by mod]n ?9k]s s9ce ! dea? ( ,leibnitz4 ,x has hi!rto be5 held z only hold+ good = g5ius1 z ! pr]ogative ( ^? ma/]s ( m54 ,b ! incongruity is only app>5t4 ,all mank9d h "s ( ! quality ( g5ius1 & no man has x entirely4 ,g5ius is a condition to :i* "o man draws close :il/ ano!r is fur!r away1 :i* is atta9$ by "s 9 e>ly days1 b ) o!rs only at ! end ( life4 ,! man to :om we h accord$ ! possession ( g5ius1 is only he :o has begun to see1 & to op5 ! eyes ( o!rs4 ,t !y !n c see ) _! own eyes proves t !y 7 only /&+ be=e ! door4 ,ev5 ! ord9>y man1 ev5 z su*1 c /& 9 an indirect relation%ip to ev]y?+3 8 idea ( ! 8:ole0 is only a glimpse1 he does n succe$ 9 id5tify+ himself ) x4 ,b he is n )\t ! possibility ( foll[+ ?is id5tification 9 ano!r1 & s atta9+ a composite image4 ,?r\gh "s vision ( ! _w he c b9d himself to ! univ]sal1 & by dilig5t cultivation he c make ea* detail a "p ( himself4 ,no?+ is q /range to him1 & 9 all a b& ( sympa?y exi/s betwe5 him & ! ?+s ( ! _w4 ,x is n s ) plants or animals4 ,!y are limit$1 !y d n "k ! :ole b only "o elem5t2 !y d n populate ! :ole e>?1 & :]e !y are widely disp]s$ x is 9 ! s]vice ( man1 :o has allott$ to !m ev]y:]e ! same task4 ,!y may h a relation to ! sun or to ! moon1 b !y c]ta9ly are want+ 9 respect ( ! 8/>ry vault0 & 8! moral law40 ,= ! latt] orig9ates 9 ! s\l ( man1 9 :i* is hidd5 all totality1 :i* c see ev]y?+ because x is univ]sal itself3 ! />ry heav5s & ! moral law are fundam5tally "o & ! same4 ,! univ]salism ( ! categorical imp]ative is ! univ]salism ( ! univ]se4 ,! inf9ity ( ! univ]se is only ! 8?\ght-picture0 ( ! inf9ity ( ! moral volition4 ,?is 0 taught1 ! microcosm 9 man1 by ,emp$ocles t mighty magician4 1 ' 1 ' 1 1 1 4 ,& ,plot9us2 1 :i* ,goe! imitat$ 9 ! fam\s v]se3 8,wr' ni*t das ,auge sonn5haft1 ,die ,sonne knnt' es nie erblick52 ,lg' ni*t 9 uns des ,gottes eig'ne ,kraft1 ,wie knnt uns ,gttli*es entzck580 ,man is ! only creature1 he is ! creature 9 ,nature1 t has 9 himself a relation to e ?+4 ,he to :om ?is relation%ip br+s und]/&+ & ! mo/ complete consci\sness1 n to _m ?+s or to few ?+s1 b to all ?+s1 ! man :o ( 8 own individuality has ?\ght out ev]y?+1 is call$ a g5ius4 ,he 9 :om ! possibility ( ?is is pres5t1 9 :om an int]e/ 9 ev]y?+ c\ld be ar\s$1 yet :o only1 ( 8 own accord1 conc]ns himself ) a few1 we call m]ely a man4 ,! !ory ( ,leibnitz1 :i* is seldom rightly und]/ood1 t ! l[] monads are a mirror ( ! _w )\t be+ consci\s ( ?is capacity ( !irs1 expresses ! same idea4 ,! man ( g5ius lives 9 a /ate ( complete und]/&+1 an und]/&+ ( ! :ole2 ! :ole _w is also 9 ord9>y m51 b n 9 a condition t c become creative4 ,! "o lives 9 consci\s active relation ) ! :ole1 ! o!r 9 an unconsci\s relation2 ! man ( g5ius is ! actual1 ! common man ! pot5tial1 microcosm4 ,! g5ius is ! complete man2 ! manhood t is lat5t 9 all m5 is 9 him fully develop$4 ,man himself is ! ,all1 & s unlike a m]e "p1 dep5d5t on o!r p>ts2 he is n assign$ a def9ite place 9 a sy/em ( natural laws1 b he himself is ! mean+ ( ! law & is !re=e free1 j z ! _w :ole be+ itself1 ! ,all does n condition itself b is uncondition$4 ,! man ( g5ius is he :o =gets no?+ because he does n =get himself1 & because =gett+1 be+ a functional subjection to "t1 is nei!r free nor e?ical4 ,he is n br\ght =w>d on ! wave ( a hi/orical movem5t z its *ild1 to be swall[$ up by ! next wave1 because all1 all ! pa/ & all ! future is conta9$ 9 8 inw>d vision4 ,he x is ^: consci\sness ( immortality is mo/ /rong because ! fe> ( dea? has no t]ror = him4 ,he x is :o lives 9 ! mo/ sympa!tic relation to symbols & values because he weighs & int]prets by ^! all t is )9 him & all t is outside him4 ,he is ! free/ & ! wise/ & ! mo/ moral ( m51 & = ^! reasons he suff]s mo/ ( all f :at is /ill unconsci\s1 :at is *aos1 :at is fatality )9 him4 ,h[ does ! morality ( great m5 reveal itself 9 _! relations to o!r m58 ,?is1 accord+ to ! popul> view1 is ! only =m :i* morality c assume1 ap>t f contrav5tions ( ! p5al code4 ,& c]ta9ly 9 ?is respect1 great m5 h display$ ! mo/ dubi\s qualities4 ,h !y n laid !mselves op5 to accusations ( base +ratitude1 extreme h>%ness1 & mu* worse faults8 ,x is c]ta9ly true t ! great] an arti/ or philosoph] may be1 ! m ru?less he w be 9 keep+ fai? ) himself1 9 ?is v way (t5 disappo9t+ ! expectations ( ^? ) :om he comes 9 contact 9 e-day life2 ^! _c foll[ 8 high] flights & s try to b9d ! eagle to e>? 7,goe! & ,lavat]7 & 9 ?is way _m great m5 h be5 br&$ z immoral4 ,goe!1 =tunately = himself1 pres]v$ a sil5ce ab\t himself s complete t mod]n p :o ?9k t !y und]/& him completely z ! light-liv+ ,olympian1 only "k a few specks ( him tak5 f 8 m>vell\s del9eation ( ,fau/2 we may be c]ta91 none ! less1 t he judg$ himself sev]ely1 & suff]$ 9 full measure = ! guilt he f\nd 9 himself4 ,& :5 an envi\s ,nrgl]1 :o nev] grasp$ ,s*op5hau]'s doctr9e ( deta*m5t & ! mean+ ( 8 ,nirwana1 ?r[s ! reproa* at ! latt] t he got ! la/ value out ( 8 prop]ty1 su* a mean yelp+ requires no answ]4 ,! /atem5t t a great man is mo/ moral t[>ds himself /&s on sure gr\nd2 he w n all[ ali5 views to be impos$ on him1 s obscur+ ! judgm5t ( 8 own ego2 he w n passively accept ! int]pretation ( ano!r1 ( an ali5 ego1 q diff]5t f 8 own1 & if ev] he has all[$ himself to be influ5c$1 ! ?\ght w always be pa9ful to him4 ,a consci\s lie t he has told w h>ass him ?r\gh\t 8 life1 & he w be unable to %ake (f ! memory 9 ,dionysian fa%ion4 ,b m5 ( g5ius w suff] mo/ :5 !y become aw>e aft]w>ds t !y h unconsci\sly help$ to spread a lie 9 _! talk or conduct ) o!rs4 ,o!r m51 :o d n possess ?is organic ?ir/ = tru?1 are always deeply involv$ 9 lies & errors1 & s d n und]/& ! bitt] revolt ( great m5 aga9/ ! 8lies ( life40 ,! great man1 he :o /&s high1 he 9 :om ! ego1 uncondition$ by "t1 is dom9ant1 seeks to ma9ta9 8 own value 9 ! pres5ce ( 8 intelligible ego by 8 intellectual & moral consci5ce4 ,8 pride is t[>ds himself2 !re is ! desire 9 him to impress 8 own self by 8 ?\ghts1 actions1 & creations4 ,?is pride is ! pride peculi> to g5ius1 possess+ its own /&>d ( value1 & x is indep5d5t ( ! judgm5t ( o!rs1 s9ce x possesses 9 itself a high] tribunal4 ,s(t & ascetic natures 7,pascal is an example7 sometimes suff] f ?is self-pride1 & yet try 9 va9 to %ake x (f4 ,?is self-pride w always be associat$ ) pride be=e o!rs1 b ! two =ms are really 9 p]petual conflict4 ,c x be said t ?is /rong adaptation to duty t[>ds oneself prejudices ! s5se ( duty t[>ds "o's neighb\rs8 ,d n ! two /& z alt]natives1 s t he :o always keeps fai? ) himself mu/ break x ) o!rs8 ,by no means4 ,z !re is only "o tru?1 s !re c be only "o desire = tru?--:at ,c>lyle call$ s9c]ity--t a man has or has n ) reg>d bo? to himself & to ! _w2 x is nev] "o ( two1 a view ( ! _w diff]+ f a view ( oneself1 a self-/udy )\t a _w-/udy2 !re is only "o duty & only "o morality4 ,man acts ei!r morally or immorally1 & if he is moral t[>ds himself he is moral t[>ds o!rs4 ,!re are few regions ( ?\ght1 h[ev]1 s full ( false ideas1 z ! conception ( moral duty t[>ds "o's neighb\rs & h[ x is to be fulfill$4 ,leav+ out ( consid]ation1 = ! mom5t1 ! !oretical sy/ems ( morality :i* are bas$ on ! ma9t5ance ( human society1 & :i* atta* less importance to ! concrete feel+s & motives at ! mom5t ( action ?an to ! effect on ! g5]al sy/em ( morality1 we come at once to ! popul> idea :i* def9es ! morality ( a man by 8 8goodness10 ! degree to :i* 8 compassionate disposition is develop$4 ,f ! philosophical po9t ( view1 ,hut*eson1 ,hume1 & ,smi? saw 9 sympa?y ! nature & s\rce ( all e?ical conduct1 & ?is view receiv$ a v /rong support f ,s*op5hau]'s sympa!tic morality4 ,s*op5hau]'s 8,essay on ! ,f\ndations ( ,morality0 %[s 9 its motto 8,x is easy to prea* morality1 difficult to f9d a basis = x10 ! fundam5tal error ( ! sympa!tic e?ics :i* always fails to recognise t ! sci5ce ( e?ics is n m]ely an explanation & description ( conduct1 b a se>* = a guide to x4 ,:oev] w be at ! pa9s dilig5tly to li/5 to ! inn] voice ( man1 9 ord] to e/abli% :at he ought to d1 w c]ta9ly reject e sy/em ( e?ics1 ! aim ( :i* is to be a doctr9e ( ! requirem5ts :i* man has inv5t$ = himself & o!rs in/ead ( be+ a relation ( :at he actually does 9 fur!r+ ^! requirem5ts or 9 /ifl+ !m4 ,! object ( all moral sci5ce is n :at is happ5+ b :at ought to happ54 ,all attempts to expla9 e?ics by psy*ology ov]look ! fact t e psy*ic ev5t 9 man is apprais$ by man himself1 & ! apprais] ( ! psy*ic ev5t _c be a psy*ic ev5t4 ,?is /&>d c only be an idea1 or a value :i* is nev] fully realis$1 & :i* _c be alt]$ by any exp]i5ce because x rema9s con/ant1 ev5 if all exp]i5ce is 9 opposition to x4 ,moral conduct c be only conduct controll$ by an idea4 ,& s we c *oose only f sy/ems ( morality :i* set up "s idea or maxim = ! regulation ( conduct1 & !re are only two to *oose f1 ! e?ical socialism or social e?ics1 f\nd$ by ,b5?am & ,mill1 b import$ to ! ,cont95t & dilig5tly propagat$ 9 ,g]many & ,norway1 & e?ical individualism su* z is taught by ,*ri/ianity & ,g]man idealism4 ,! second failure ( all ! sy/ems ( e?ics f\nd$ on sympa?y is t !y attempt to f9d a f\ndation = morality1 to expla9 morality1 :il/ ! v conception ( morality is t x %\ld be ! ultimate /&>d ( human conduct1 & s mu/ be inexplicable & non-d]ivative1 mu/ be its own purpose1 & _c be br\ght into relation ( cause & effect ) any?+ outside itself4 ,?is attempt$ d]ivation ( morality is simply ano!r aspect ( ! purely descriptive1 & !re=e necess>ily1 relative1 e?ics1 & is unt5able f ! fact t h[ev] dilig5tly ! se>* be made1 x is impossible to f9d 9 ! sph]e ( causes & effects a high aim t w\ld be applicable to e moral action4 ,! inspir+ motive ( an action _c come f any nexus ( cause & effect2 x is mu* m 9 ! nature ( ?+s = cause & effect to be l9k$ ) an inspir+ moral aim4 ,outside ! doma9 ( fir/ causes !re lies a doma9 ( moral aims1 & ?is latt] doma9 is ! inh]itance ( mank9d4 ,! complete sci5ce ( exi/5ce is a l9k+ toge!r ( fir/ causes until ! fir/ cause ( all is rea*$1 & a complete sci5ce ( 8oughts0 leads to a union ( all 9 "o great aim1 ! culm9at+ moral imp]ative4 ,he :o rates sympa?y z a positive moral factor has treat$ z moral some?+ t is a feel+1 n an act4 ,sympa?y may be an e?ical ph5om5on1 ! expression ( some?+ e?ical1 b x is no m an e?ical act ?an are ! s5ses ( %ame & pride2 we mu/ cle>ly di/+ui% betwe5 an e?ical act & an e?ical ph5om5on4 ,no?+ mu/ be consid]$ an e?ical act t is n a confirmation ( ! e?ical idea by action2 e?ical ph5om5a are unprem$itat$1 involunt>y signs ( a p]man5t t5d5cy ( ! disposition t[>ds ! moral idea4 ,x is 9 ! /ruggle betwe5 motives t ! idea presses 9 & seeks to make ! decision2 ! empirical mixture ( e?ical & une?ical feel+s1 sympa?y & malice1 self-confid5ce & presumption1 gives no help t[>ds a conclusion4 ,sympa?y is1 p]haps1 ! sure/ sign ( a disposition1 b x is n ! moral purpose inspir+ an action4 ,morality mu/ imply consci\s k ( ! moral purpose & ( value z oppos$ to wor?lessness4 ,socrates 0 "r 9 ?is1 & ,kant is ! only mod]n philosoph] :o has foll[$ him4 ,sympa?y is a non-logical s5sation1 & has no claim to respect4 ,! "q n[ be=e u is to consid] h[ f> a man c act morally ) reg>d to 8 fell[ m54 ,x is c]ta9ly n by unsolicit$ help :i* obtrudes itself on ! solitude ( ano!r & pi]ces ! limits t he has set = himself2 n by compassion b r by respect4 ,?is respect we owe only to man1 z ,kant %[$2 = man is ! only creature 9 ! univ]se :o is a purpose to himself4 ,b h[ c ,i %[ a man my contempt1 & h[ prove to him my respect8 ,! fir/ by ignor+ him1 ! second by be+ fri5dly ) him4 ,h[ c ,i use him z a means to an end1 & h[ c ,i hon\r him by reg>d+ him himself z an end8 ,9 ! fir/ case1 by look+ ^u him z a l9k 9 ! *a9 ( circum/ances ) :i* ,i h to deal2 9 ! second1 by endeav\r+ to und]/& him4 ,x is only by int]e/+ oneself 9 a man1 )\t exactly tell+ him s1 by ?9k+ ( him1 by grasp+ 8 "w1 by sympa?is+ ) 8 fate1 & by seek+ to und]/& him1 t "o c respect "o's neighb\r4 ,only he :o1 ?r\gh 8 own afflictions1 has become unselfi%1 :o =gets small wrangl+s ) 8 fell[ man1 :o c repress 8 impati5ce1 & :o endeav\rs to und]/& him1 is really dis9t]e/$ ) reg>d to 8 neighb\r2 & he behaves morally because he triumphs ov] ! /ronge/ enemy to 8 und]/&+ ( 8 neighb\r--selfi%ness4 ,h[ does ! fam\s man /& 9 ?is respect8 ,he :o und]/&s ! mo/ m51 because he is mo/ univ]sal 9 disposition1 & :o lives 9 ! close/ relation to ! univ]se at l>ge1 :o mo/ e>ne/ly desires to und]/& its purpose1 w be mo/ likely to act well t[>ds 8 neighb\r4 ,z a matt] ( fact1 no "o ?9ks s mu* or s int5tly z he ab\t o!r p 7ev5 al?\gh he has only se5 !m = a mom5t71 & no "o tries s h>d to und]/& !m if he does n feel t he already has !m )9 him 9 all _! significance4 ,inasmu* z he has a cont9u\s pa/1 a complete ego ( 8 own1 he c create ! pa/ :i* he did n "k = o!rs4 ,he foll[s ! /ronge/ b5t ( 8 inn] be+ if he ?9ks ab\t !m1 = he seeks only to come to ! tru? ab\t !m by und]/&+ !m4 ,he sees t human be+s are all memb]s ( an intelligible _w1 9 :i* !re is no n>r[ egoism or altruism4 ,?is is ! only explanation ( h[ x is t great m5 /& 9 vital1 und]/&+ relation%ip1 n only ) ^? r\nd ab\t !m1 b ) all ! p]sonalities ( hi/ory :o h prec$$ !m2 ?is is ! only reason :y great arti/s h grasp$ hi/orical p]sonalities s mu* bett] & m int5sively ?an sci5tific hi/orians4 ,!re has be5 no great man :o has n /ood 9 a p]sonal relation%ip to ,napoleon1 ,plato1 or ,mahomet4 ,x is 9 ?is way t he %[s 8 respect & true rev]5ce = ^? :o h liv$ be=e him4 ,:5 _m ( ^? :o h be5 intimate ) arti/s feel aggriev$ :5 lat] on !y recognise !mselves 9 _! works2 :5 writ]s are reproa*$ = treat+ ev]y?+ z copy1 x is easy en\gh to und]/& ! feel+4 ,b ! arti/ or au?or :o does n he$ ! littl5esses ( mank9d has committ$ no crime1 he has simply employ$ 8 creative act ( und]/&+ ) reg>d to !m1 by a s+le-m9d$ repres5tation & reproduction ( ! _w ar\nd him1 & !re c be no high] relation betwe5 m5 ?an ?is4 ,! foll[+ words ( ,pascal1 :i* h already be5 m5tion$1 are specially applicable "h3 8,a mesure qu'on a plus d'esprit1 on tr\ve qu'il y a plus d'hommes orig9aux4 ,les g5s du commun ne tr\v5t pas de diffr5ce entre les hommes40 ,x foll[s f ! =ego+ t ! great] a man is ! great] ef=ts he w make to und]/& ?+s t are mo/ /range to him1 :il/ ! ord9>y man readily ?9ks t he und]/&s a ?+1 al?\gh x may be some?+ he does n at all und]/&1 s t he fails to p]ceive ! unfamili> _s :i* is appeal+ to him f "s object ( art or f a philosophy1 & at mo/ atta9s a sup]ficial relation to ! subject1 b does n rise to ! inspiration ( its creator4 ,! great man :o atta9s to ! highe/ rungs ( consci\sness does n easily id5tify himself & 8 op9ion ) any?+ he reads1 :il/ ^? ) a less] cl>ity ( m9d adopt1 & imag9e t !y absorb1 ?+s t 9 reality are v diff]5t4 ,! man ( g5ius is he ^: ego has acquir$ consci\sness4 ,he is enabl$ by x to di/+ui% ! fact t o!rs are diff]5t1 to p]ceive ! 8ego0 ( o!r m51 ev5 :5 x is n pron\nc$ en\gh = !m to be consci\s ( x !mselves4 ,b x is only he :o feels t e o!r man is also an ego1 a monad1 an individual c5tre ( ! univ]se1 ) specific mann] ( feel+ & ?9k+ & a di/9ct pa/1 he alone is 9 a position to avoid mak+ use ( 8 neighb\rs z means to an end1 he1 accord+ to ! e?ics ( ,kant1 w trace1 anticipate1 & !re=e respect ! p]sonality 9 8 companion 7z "p ( ! intelligible univ]se71 & w n m]ely be sc&alis$ by him4 ,! psy*ological condition ( all practical altruism1 !re=e1 is !oretical individualism4 ,"h lies ! bridge betwe5 moral conduct t[>ds oneself & moral conduct t[>ds "o's neighb\r1 ! app>5t want ( :i* 9 ! ,kantian philosophy ,s*op5hau] unju/ly reg>d$ z a fault1 & ass]t$ to arise necess>ily out ( ,kant's fir/ pr9ciples4 ,x is easy to give pro(s4 ,only brutalis$ crim9als & insane p]sons take absolutely no int]e/ 9 _! fell[ m52 !y live z if !y 7 alone 9 ! _w1 & ! pres5ce ( /rang]s has no effect on !m4 ,b = him :o possesses a self !re is a self 9 8 neighb\r1 & only ! man :o has lo/ ! logical & e?ical c5tre ( 8 be+ behaves to a second man z if ! latt] 7 n a man & _h no p]sonality ( 8 own4 8,i0 & 8?\0 are complem5t>y t]ms4 ,a man soone/ ga9s consci\sness ( himself :5 he is ) o!r m54 ,?is is :y a man is pr\d] 9 ! pres5ce ( o!r m5 ?an :5 he is alone1 :il/ x is 9 8 h\rs ( solitude t 8 self-confid5ce is damp$4 ,la/ly1 he :o de/roys himself de/roys at ! same "t ! :ole univ]se1 & he :o murd]s ano!r commits ! greate/ crime because he murd]s himself 9 8 victim4 ,absolute selfi%ness is1 9 practice1 a horror1 :i* %\ld r be call$ nihilism2 if !re is no 8?\10 !re is c]ta9ly no 8,i10 & t w\ld mean !re is no?+4 ,!re is 9 ! psy*ological disposition ( ! man ( g5ius t :i* makes x impossible to use o!r m5 z a means to an end4 ,& ?is is x3 he :o feels 8 own p]sonality1 feels x also 9 o!rs4 ,= him ! ,tat-tvam-asi is no beautiful hypo!sis1 b a reality4 ,! highe/ individualism is ! highe/ univ]salism4 ,erne/ ,ma* is 9 great error :5 he d5ies ! subject1 & ?9ks x is only aft] ! r5unciation ( ! individual 8,i0 t an e?ical relation1 :i* excludes neglect ( ! /range 8,i0 & ov]-e/imation ( ! individual 8,i10 may be expect$4 ,x has already be5 se5 :]e ! want ( "o's own ,i leads 9 relation to "o's neighb\r4 ,! ,i is ! fundam5tal gr\nd ( all social morality4 ,i %\ld nev] be able to place myself1 z an actual psy*ological be+1 9 an e?ical relation to a m]e bundle ( elem5ts4 ,x is possible to imag9e su* a relation%ip2 b x is entirely oppos$ to practical conduct2 because x elim9ates ! psy*ological condition necess>y = mak+ ! moral idea an actual reality4 ,we are prep>+ = a real e?ical relation to our fell[ m5 :5 we make !m consci\s t ea* ( !m possesses a high] self1 a s\l1 & t !y mu/ realise ! s\ls 9 o!rs4 ,?is relation is1 h[ev]1 manife/$ 9 ! mo/ curi\s mann] 9 ! man ( g5ius4 ,no "o suff]s s mu* z he ) ! p1 &1 !re=e1 = ! p1 ) :om he lives4 ,=1 9 a c]ta9 s5se1 x is c]ta9ly only 8by suff]+0 t a man kn[s4 ,if compassion is n itself cle>1 ab/ractly conceivable or visibly symbolic k1 x is1 at any rate1 ! /ronge/ impulse = ! acquisition ( k4 ,x is only by suff]+ t ! g5ius und]/&s m54 ,& ! g5ius suff]s mo/ because he suff]s ) & 9 ea* & all2 b he suff]s mo/ ?r\gh 8 und]/&+4 ,al?\gh ,i tri$ to %[ 9 an e>li] *apt] t g5ius is ! factor :i* prim>ily elevates man above ! animals1 & 9 connection ) t fact t x is man alone :o has a hi/ory 7?is be+ expla9$ by ! pres5ce 9 all m5 ( "s degree ( ! quality ( g5ius71 ,i mu/ return to t e>li] side ( my argum5t4 ,g5ius involves ! liv+ actuality ( ! intelligible subject4 ,hi/ory manife/s itself only z a social ?+1 z ! 8objective _s10 ! individuals z su* play+ no "p 9 x1 be+1 9 fact1 non-hi/orical4 ,"h we see ! ?reads ( our argum5t conv]g+4 ,if x be ! case1 & ,i d n ?9k t ,i am wrong1 t ! timeless1 human p]sonality is ! necess>y condition ( e real e?ical relation to our fell[ m51 & if individuality is ! necess>y prelim9>y to ! collective _s1 !n x is cle> :y ! 8metaphysical animal0 & ! 8political animal10 ! possessor ( g5ius & ! mak] ( hi/ory1 are "o & ! same1 are humanity4 ,& ! old controv]sy is settl$2 :i* comes fir/1 ! individual or ! community8 ,bo? mu/ be equal & simultane\s4 ,i ?9k t ,i h prov$ at e po9t t g5ius is simply ! high] morality4 ,! great man is n only ! true/ to himself1 ! mo/ un=getful1 ! "o to :om errors & lies are mo/ hateful & intol]able2 he is also ! mo/ social1 at ! same "t ! mo/ self-conta9$1 & ! mo/ op5 man4 ,! g5ius is altoge!r a high] =m1 n m]ely intellectually1 b also morally4 ,9 8 own p]son1 ! g5ius reveals ! idea ( mank9d4 ,he repres5ts :at man is2 he is ! subject ^: object is ! :ole univ]se :i* he makes endure = all "t4 ,let !re be no mi/ake4 ,consci\sness & consci\sness alone is 9 itself moral2 all unconsci\sness is immoral1 & all immorality is unconsci\s4 ,! 8immoral g5ius10 ! 8great wick$ man10 is1 !re=e1 a my?ical animal1 inv5t$ by great m5 9 c]ta9 mom5ts ( _! lives z a possibility1 9 ord] 7v mu* aga9/ ! w ( ! ,creator7 to s]ve z a bogey = n]v\s & timid natures1 ) :i* !y fright5 !mselves & o!r *ildr54 ,no crim9al :o prid$ himself 9 8 de$ w\ld speak l ,hag5 9 ! 8,gtt]dmm]ung0 ov] ,siegfri$'s dead body3 8,ha1 ha1 ,i h sla9 him2 ,i1 ,hag51 gave him 8 dea? bl[40 ,napoleon & ,bacon1 :o are giv5 z c\nt]-in/ances1 7 intellectually mu* ov]-rat$ or wrongly repres5t$4 ,& ,nietzs*e is ! lea/ reliable 9 ^! matt]s1 :5 he beg9s to discuss ! ,borgia type4 ,! conception ( ! diabolical1 ( ! anti-,*ri/1 ( ,ahriman1 ( ! 8radical evil 9 human nature10 is exce$+ly p[]ful1 yet x conc]ns g5ius only inasmu* z x is ! opposite ( x4 ,x is a fiction1 creat$ 9 ! h\rs 9 :i* great m5 h /ruggl$ aga9/ ! evil 9 !mselves4 ,univ]sal compreh5sion1 full consci\sness1 & p]fect timelessness are an ideal condition1 ideal ev5 = gift$ m52 g5ius is an innate imp]ative1 :i* nev] becomes a fully accompli%$ fact 9 human be+s4 ,h5ce x is t a man ( g5ius w be ! la/ man to feel himself 9 ! position to say ( himself3 8,i am a g5ius40 ,g5ius is1 9 its ess5ce1 no?+ b ! full completion ( ! idea ( a man1 &1 !re=e1 e man ought to h "s quality ( x1 & x %\ld be reg>d$ z a possible pr9ciple = e "o4 ,g5ius is ! highe/ morality1 &1 !re=e1 x is e "o's duty4 ,g5ius is to be atta9$ by a supreme act ( ! w1 9 :i* ! :ole univ]se is affirm$ 9 ! individual4 ,g5ius is some?+ :i* 8m5 ( g5ius0 take ^u !mselves2 x is ! greate/ ex]tion & ! greate/ pride1 ! greate/ mis]y & ! greate/ ec/asy to a man4 ,a man may become a g5ius if he wi%es to4 ,b at once x w c]ta9ly be said3 8,v _m m5 w\ld l v mu* to be #8orig9al g5iuses1'0 & _! wi% has no effect4 ,b if ^! m5 :o 8w\ld l v mu*0 _h a liveli] s5se ( :at is signifi$ by _! wi%1 if !y 7 aw>e t g5ius is id5tical ) univ]sal responsibility--& until t is grasp$ x w only be a wi% & n a det]m9ation--x is highly probable t a v l>ge numb] ( ^! m5 w\ld cease to wi% to become g5iuses4 ,! reason :y madness ov]takes s _m m5 ( g5ius--fools believe x comes f ! influ5ce ( ,v5us1 or ! sp9al deg5]ation ( neura/h5ics--is t = _m ! burd5 becomes too heavy1 ! task ( be>+ ! :ole _w on ! %\ld]s1 l ,atlas1 intol]able = ! small]1 b nev] = ! really mighty m9ds4 ,b ! high] a man m\nts1 ! great] may be 8 fall2 all g5ius is a conqu]+ ( *aos1 my/]y1 & d>kness1 & if x deg5]ates & goes to pieces1 ! ru9 is great] 9 proportion to ! success4 ,! g5ius :i* runs to madness is no long] g5ius2 x has *os5 happ9ess in/ead ( morality4 ,all madness is ! outcome ( ! insupportability ( suff]+ atta*$ to all consci\sness4 ,sophocles d]iv$ 8 idea t a man might wi% to become mad = ?is reason1 & lets ,aias1 ^: m9d f9ally gives way1 give utt]ance to ^! words3 4 ,i %all conclude ?is *apt] ) ! solemn words1 simil> to ! be/ mom5ts ( ,kant's /yle1 ( ,johann ,pico von ,mir&ola1 to :om ,i may br+ "s measure ( recognition4 ,9 8 address 8on ! dignity ( man0 ! ,supreme ,be+ addresses ! foll[+ words to man3 8,nec c]tam s$em1 nec propriam faciem1 nec munus ullum peculi>e tibi d$imus1 ,o ,adam3 ut quam s$em1 quam faciem1 quae mun]a tute optav]is1 ea pro voto1 pro tua s5t5tia1 habeas et possideas4 ,def9ita caet]is natura intra praescriptas a nobis leges co]cetur2 tu nullis angu/iis co]citus1 pro tuo arbitrio1 9 cuius manu te posui1 tibi illam praef9ies4 ,m$ium te mundi posui1 ut circumspic]es inde commodius quicquid e/ 9 mundo4 ,nec te caele/em1 neque t]r5um1 neque mortalem1 neque immortalem fecimus1 ut tui ipsius quasi arbitr>ius honor>iusque pla/es et fictor 9 quam malu]is tute =mam eff+as4 ,pot]is 9 inf]iora quae sunt bruta deg5]>e1 pot]is 9 sup]iora quae sunt div9a1 ex tui animi s5t5tia reg5]>i4 ,o summam ,dei ,patris lib]alitatem1 summam et admir&am hom9is felicitatem3 cui datum id hab]e quod optat1 id esse quod velit4 ,bruta simul atque nascuntur id secum aff]unt e bulga matris1 quod possessura sunt4 ,supremi spiritus aut ab initio aut paulo mox id fu]unt1 quod sunt futuri 9 p]petuas aet]nitates4 ,nasc5ti hom9i omnif]>ia sem9a et omnig5ae vitae g]m9a indidit ,pat]2 quae quisque excolu]it1 illa adolesc5t et fructus suos f]5t 9 illo3 si vegetalia1 planta fiet1 si s5sualia1 obbrutescet1 si rationalia1 caele/e evadet animal1 si intellectualia1 angelus erit et ,dei filius4 ,et si nulla creatur>um sorte cont5tus 9 unitatis c5trum suac se recep]it1 unus cum ,deo spiritus factus1 9 solit>ia ,patris calig9e qui e/ sup] omnia con/itutus omnibus ante/abit04 ,,*apt] ,,ix ,,male ,,& ,,female ,,psy*ology ,x is n[ "t to return to ! actual subject ( ?is inve/igation 9 ord] to see h[ f> its explanation has be5 help$ by ! l5g?y digressions1 :i* mu/ (t5 h seem$ wide ( ! m>k4 ,! consequ5ces ( ! fundam5tal pr9ciples t h be5 develop$ are ( su* radical importance to ! psy*ology ( ! sexes t1 ev5 if ! =m] d$uctions h be5 ass5t$ to1 ! pres5t conclusions may f9d no acceptance4 ,?is is n ! place to analyse su* a possibility2 b 9 ord] to protect ! !ory ,i am n[ go+ to set up1 f all objections1 ,i %all fully sub/antiate x 9 ! fulle/ possible mann] by conv9c+ argum5ts4 ,%ortly speak+ ! matt] /&s z foll[s3 ,i h %[n t logical & e?ical ph5om5a come toge!r 9 ! conception ( tru? z ! ultimate good1 & posit ! exi/5ce ( an intelligible ego or a s\l1 z a =m ( be+ ( ! highe/ sup]-empirical reality4 ,9 su* a be+ z ! absolute female !re are no logical & e?ical ph5om5a1 &1 !re=e1 ! gr\nd = ! assumption ( a s\l is abs5t4 ,! absolute female kn[s nei!r ! logical nor ! moral imp]ative1 & ! words law & duty1 duty t[>ds h]self1 are words :i* are lea/ famili> to h]4 ,! inf]5ce t %e is want+ 9 sup]s5sual p]sonality is fully ju/ifi$4 ,! absolute female has no ego4 ,9 a c]ta9 s5se ?is is an end ( ! inve/igation1 a f9al conclusion to :i* all analysis ( ! female leads4 ,& al?\gh ?is conclusion1 put ?us concisely1 seems h>% & intol]ant1 p>adoxical & too abrupt 9 its novelty1 x mu/ be rememb]$ t ! au?or is n ! fir/ :o has tak5 su* a view2 he is m 9 ! position ( "o :o has discov]$ ! philosophical gr\nds = an op9ion ( long /&+4 ,! ,*9ese f "t immemorial h d5i$ t wom5 possess a p]sonal s\l4 ,if a ,*9aman is ask$ h[ _m *ildr5 he has1 he c\nts only ! boys1 & w say none if he has only daught]s4 ,mahomet exclud$ wom5 f ,p>adise = ! same reason1 & on ?is view dep5ds ! degrad$ position ( wom5 9 ,ori5tal c\ntries4 ,among/ ! philosoph]s1 ! op9ions ( ,ari/otle mu/ fir/ be consid]$4 ,he held t 9 procreation ! male pr9ciple 0 ! =mative active ag5t1 ! 8logos10 :il/ ! female 0 ! passive mat]ial4 ,:5 we rememb] t ,ari/otle uses ! ^w 8s\l0 = ! active1 =mative1 causative pr9ciple1 x is pla9 t 8 idea 0 ak9 to m9e1 al?\gh1 z he actually express$ x1 x relat$ only to ! reproductive process2 x is cle>1 moreov]1 t he1 l all ! ,greek philosoph]s except ,euripides1 paid no he$ to woman1 & did n consid] h] qualities f any o!r po9t ( view ?an t ( h] %>e 9 reproduction4 ,among/ ! fa!rs ( ! ,*ur*1 ,t]tullian & ,orig5 c]ta9ly _h a v l[ op9ion ( woman1 & ,/4 ,augu/9e1 except = 8 relations ) 8 "m1 seems to h %>$ _! view4 ,at ! ,r5aissance ! ,ari/otelian conceptions ga9$ _m new adh]5ts1 among/ :om ,jean ,wi] 7#aeah-aehh7 may be cit$ specially4 ,at t p]iod !re 0 a g5]al1 m s5sible & intuitive und]/&+ on ! subject1 :i* is n[ treat$ z m]ely curi\s1 contempor>y sci5ce hav+ b[$ ! knee to o!r ?an ,ari/otelian gods4 ,9 rec5t ye>s ,h5rik ,ibs5 79 ! *>act]s ( ,anitra1 ,rita1 & ,ir5e7 & ,augu/ ,/r9db]g h giv5 utt]ance to ?is view4 ,b ! popul>ity ( ! idea ( ! s\llessness ( woman has be5 mo/ atta9$ by ! wond]ful fairy tales ( ,f\qu1 :o obta9$ ! mat]ial = !m f ,p>acelsus1 aft] deep /udy1 & :i* h be5 set to music by ,e4 ,t4 ,a4 ,h(fman1 ,girs*n]1 & ,alb]t ,lorz+4 ,und9e1 ! s\lless ,und9e1 is ! platonic idea ( woman4 ,9 spite ( all bi-sexuality %e mo/ really resembles ! actuality4 ,! well-kn[n phrase1 8,wom5 h no "*10 really means ! same ?+4 ,p]sonality & individuality 7intelligible71 ego & s\l1 w & 7intelligible7 "*1 all ^! are diff]5t expressions ( ! same actuality1 an actuality ! male ( mank9d atta9s1 ! female lacks4 ,b s9ce ! s\l ( man is ! microcosm1 & great m5 are ^? :o live entirely 9 & ?r\gh _! s\ls1 ! :ole univ]se ?us hav+ its be+ 9 !m1 ! female mu/ be describ$ z absolutely )\t ! quality ( g5ius4 ,! male has ev]y?+ )9 him1 &1 z ,pico ( ,mir&ola put x1 only specialises 9 ?is or t "p ( himself4 ,x is possible = him to atta9 to ! l(tie/ heights1 or to s9k to ! l[e/ dep?s2 he c become l animals1 or plants1 or ev5 l wom51 & s !re exi/ woman-l female m54 ,! woman1 on ! o!r h&1 c nev] become a man4 ,9 ?is consi/s ! mo/ important limitation to ! ass]tions 9 ! fir/ "p ( ?is "w4 ,:il/ ,i "k ( _m m5 :o are practically completely psy*ically female1 n m]ely half s1 & h se5 a consid]able numb] ( wom5 ) mascul9e traits1 ,i h nev] yet se5 a s+le woman :o 0 n fundam5tally female1 ev5 :5 ?is femal5ess has be5 conceal$ by v>i\s accessories f ! p]son h]self1 n to speak ( o!rs4 ,"o mu/ be 7cf4 *ap4 i4 "p ,i47 ei!r man or woman1 h[ev] _m peculi>ities ( bo? sexes "o may h1 & ?is 8be+10 ! problem ( ?is "w f ! />t1 is det]m9$ by "o's relation to e?ics & logic2 b :il/ !re are p :o are anatomically m5 & psy*ically wom51 !re is no su* ?+ z a p]son :o is physically female & psy*ically male1 not)/&+ ! extreme mal5ess ( _! outw>d appe>ance & ! unwomanl9ess ( _! expression4 ,we may n[ give1 ) c]ta9ty1 a conclusive answ] to ! "q z to ! gift$ness ( ! sexes3 !re are wom5 ) und\bt$ traits ( g5ius1 b !re is no female g5ius1 & !re nev] has be5 "o 7n ev5 among/ ^? mascul9e wom5 ( hi/ory :i* 7 dealt ) 9 ! fir/ "p71 & !re nev] c be "o4 ,^? :o are 9 fav\r ( laxity 9 ^! matt]s1 & are anxi\s to ext5d & enl>ge ! idea ( g5ius 9 ord] to make x possible to include wom51 w\ld simply by su* action de/roy ! conception ( g5ius4 ,if x is 9 any way possible to frame a def9ition ( g5ius t w\ld ?or\ghly cov] ! gr\nd1 ,i believe t my def9ition succe$s4 ,& h[1 !n1 c\ld a s\lless be+ possess g5ius8 ,! possession ( g5ius is id5tical ) pr(undity2 & if any "o 7 to try to comb9e woman & pr(undity z subject & pr$icate1 he w\ld be contradict$ on all sides4 ,a female g5ius is a contradiction 9 t]ms1 = g5ius is simply int5sifi$1 p]fectly develop$1 univ]sally consci\s mal5ess4 ,! man ( g5ius possesses1 l ev]y?+ else1 ! complete female 9 himself2 b woman h]self is only a "p ( ! ,univ]se1 & ! "p c nev] be ! :ole2 femal5ess c nev] include g5ius4 ,?is lack ( g5ius on ! "p ( woman is inevitable because woman is n a monad1 & _c reflect ! ,univ]se4#ab #ab ,x w\ld be a simple matt] to introduce at ?is po9t a li/ ( ! works ( ! mo/ fam\s wom51 & %[ by a few examples h[ little !y des]ve ! title ( g5ius4 ,b x w\ld be a we>isome task1 & any "o :o w\ld make use ( su* a li/ c easily procure x = himself1 s t ,i %all n d s4 ,! pro( ( ! s\llessness ( woman is closely connect$ ) mu* ( :at 0 conta9$ 9 ! e>li] *apt]s4 ,! ?ird *apt] expla9$ t woman has h] exp]i5ces 9 ! =m ( h5ids1 :il/ ^? ( m5 are 9 an organis$ =m1 s t ! consci\sness ( ! female is l[] 9 grade ?an t ( ! male4 ,consci\sness1 h[ev]1 is psy*ologically a fundam5tal "p ( ! !ory ( k4 ,f ! po9t ( view ( ! !ory ( k1 consci\sness & ! possession ( a cont9u\s ego1 ( a transc5d5tal subjective s\l1 are id5tical conceptions4 ,e ego exi/s only s f> z x is self-consci\s1 consci\s ( ! cont5ts ( its own ?\ghts2 all real exi/5ce is consci\s exi/5ce4 ,i c n[ make an important addition to ! !ory ( h5ids4 ,! organis$ cont5ts ( ! ?\ghts ( ! male are n m]ely ^? ( ! female articulat$ & =m$1 !y are n :at 0 pot5tial 9 ! female becom+ actual2 f ! v fir/ !re is a qualitative diff]5ce4 ,! psy*ical cont5ts ( ! male1 ev5 :il/ !y are /ill 9 ! h5id /age t !y always try to em]ge f1 are already p>tly conceptual1 & x is probable t ev5 p]ceptions 9 ! male h a direct t5d5cy t[>ds conceptions4 ,9 ! female1 on ! o!r h&1 !re is no trace ( conception ei!r 9 recognition or 9 ?9k+4 ,! logical axioms are ! f\ndation ( all =mation ( m5tal conceptions1 & wom5 are devoid ( ^!2 ! pr9ciple ( id5tity is n = !m an inevitable /&>d1 nor d !y f5ce (f all o!r possibilities f _! conception by us+ ! pr9ciple ( contradictories4 ,?is want ( def9it5ess 9 ! ideas ( wom5 is ! s\rce ( t 8s5sitiv5ess0 :i* gives ! wide/ scope to vague associations & all[s ! mo/ radically diff]5t ?+s to be gr\p$ toge!r4 ,& ev5 wom5 ) ! be/ & lea/ limit$ memories nev] free !mselves f ?is k9d ( association by feel+s4 ,= in/ance1 if !y 8feel rem9d$0 by a ^w ( "s def9ite col\r1 or by a human be+ ( "s def9ite ?+ to eat--=ms ( association common ) wom5--!y re/ cont5t ) ! subjective association1 & d n try to f9d out ! s\rce ( ! comp>ison1 & if !re is any relation 9 x to actual fact4 ,! complac5cy & self-satisfaction ( wom5 corresponds ) :at has be5 call$ _! intellectual unscrupul\sness1 & w be ref]r$ to aga9 9 connection ) _! want ( ! p[] to =m concepts4 ,?is subjection to waves ( feel+1 ?is want ( respect = conceptions1 ?is self-appreciation )\t any attempt to avoid %all[ness1 *>act]ise z ess5tially female ! *angeable /yles ( _m mod]n pa9t]s & noveli/s4 ,male ?\ght is fundam5tally diff]5t f female ?\ght 9 its crav+ = def9ite =m1 & all art t consi/s ( moods is ess5tially a =mless art4 ,! psy*ical cont5ts ( man's ?\ghts1 !re=e1 are m ?an ! explicit realisation ( :at wom5 ?9k 9 h5ids4 ,woman's ?\ght is a slid+ & glid+ ?r\gh subjects1 a sup]ficial ta/+ ( ?+s t a man1 :o /udies ! dep?s1 w\ld sc>cely notice2 x is an extravagant & da9ty me?od ( skimm+ :i* has no grasp ( accuracy4 ,a woman's ?\ght is sup]ficial1 & t\* is ! mo/ highly develop$ ( ! female s5ses1 ! mo/ notable *>act]i/ic ( ! woman :i* %e c br+ to a high /ate by h] unaid$ ef=ts4 ,t\* necessitates a limit+ ( ! int]e/ to sup]ficialities1 x is a vague effect ( ! :ole & does n dep5d on def9ite details4 ,:5 a woman 8und]/&s0 a man 7( ! possibility or impossibility ( any real und]/&+ ,i %all speak lat]7 %e is simply1 s to speak ta/+ 7h[ev] want+ 9 ta/e ! comp>ison may be7 :at he has ?\ght ab\t h]4 ,s9ce1 on h] own "p1 !re is no %>p diff]5tiation1 x is pla9 t %e w (t5 ?9k t %e h]self has be5 und]/ood :5 !re is no m pres5t ?an a vague simil>ity ( p]ceptions4 ,! incongruity betwe5 ! man & woman dep5ds1 9 a special measure1 on ! fact t ! cont5ts ( ! ?\ghts ( ! man are n m]ely ^? ( ! woman 9 a high] /ate ( diff]5tiation1 b t ! two h totally di/9ct sequ5ces ( ?\ght appli$ to ! same object1 conceptual ?\ght 9 ! "o & indi/9ct s5s+ 9 ! o!r2 & :5 :at is call$ 8und]/&+0 9 ! two cases is comp>$1 ! comp>ison is n betwe5 a fully organis$ integrat$ ?\ght & a l[] /age ( ! same process2 b 9 ! und]/&+ ( man & woman !re is on ! "o side a conceptual ?\ght1 on ! o!r side an unconceptual 8feel+10 a h5id4 ,! unconceptual nature ( ! ?9k+ ( a woman is simply ! result ( h] less p]fect consci\sness1 ( h] want ( an ego4 ,x is ! conception t unites ! m]e complex ( p]ceptions into an object1 & ?is x does indep5d5tly ( ! pres5ce ( an actual p]ception4 ,! exi/5ce ( ! complex ( p]ceptions is dep5d5t on ! w2 ! w c %ut ! eyes & /op ! e>s s t ! p]son no long] sees nor he>s1 b may get drunk or g to sleep & =get4 ,x is ! conception :i* br+s fre$om f ! et]nally subjective1 et]nally psy*ological relativity ( ! actual p]ceptions1 & :i* creates ! ?+s 9 !mselves4 ,by its p[] ( =m+ conceptions ! intellect c spontane\sly sep>ate itself f ! object2 conv]sely1 x is only :5 !re is a compreh5d+ function t subject & object c be sep>at$ & s di/+ui%$2 9 all o!r cases !re is only a mass ( l & unlike images pres5t m+l+ toge!r )\t law & ord]4 ,! conception creates def9ite realities f ! float+ images1 ! object f ! p]ception1 ! object :i* /&s l an enemy opposite ! subject t ! subject may measure its /r5g? ^u x4 ,! conception is ?us ! creator ( reality2 x is ! 8transc5d5tal object0 ( ,kant's 8,critique ( ,reason10 b x always involves a transc5d5tal 8subject40 ,x is impossible to say ( a m]e complex ( p]ceptions t x is l itself2 9 ! mom5t t ,i h made ! judgm5t ( id5tity1 ! complex ( p]ceptions has become a concept4 ,& s ! conception gives _! value to all processes ( v]ification & all syllogisms2 ! conception makes ! cont5ts ( ?\ght free by b9d+ !m4 ,x gives fre$om bo? to ! subject & object2 = ! two fre$oms involve ea* o!r4 ,all fre$om is 9 reality self-b9d+1 bo? 9 logic & 9 e?ics4 ,man is free only :5 he himself is ! law4 ,& s ! function ( mak+ concepts is ! p[] by :i* man gives himself dignity2 he hon\rs himself by giv+ fre$om to ! objective _w1 by mak+ x "p ( ! objective body ( k to :i* rec\rse may be _h :5 two m5 diff]4 ,! woman _c 9 ?is way set h]self ov] aga9/ realities1 %e & !y sw+ toge!r caprici\sly2 %e _c give fre$om to h] objects z %e h]self is n free4 ,! mode 9 :i* p]ceptions acquire indep5d5ce 9 conceptions is ! means ( gett+ free f subjectivity4 ,! conception is t ab\t :i* ,i ?9k1 write1 & speak4 ,& 9 ?is way !re comes ! belief t ,i c make judgm5ts conc]n+ x4 ,hume1 ,huxley1 & o!r 8imman5t0 psy*ologi/s1 tri$ to id5tify ! conception ) a m]e g5]alisation1 s mak+ no di/9ction betwe5 logical & psy*ological ?\ght4 ,9 do+ ?is !y ignor$ ! p[] ( mak+ judgm5ts4 ,9 e judgm5t !re is an act ( v]ification or ( contradiction1 an approval or rejection1 & ! /&>d = ^! judgm5ts1 ! idea ( tru?1 mu/ be some?+ ext]nal to t on :at x is act+4 ,if !re are no?+ b p]ceptions1 !n all p]ceptions mu/ h an equal validity1 & !re c be no /&>d by :i* to =m a real _w4 ,empiricism 9 ?is fa%ion really de/roys ! reality ( exp]i5ce1 & :at is call$ positivism is no m ?an nihilism4 ,! idea ( a /&>d ( tru?1 ! idea ( tru?1 _c lie 9 exp]i5ce4 ,9 e judgm5t ?is idea ( ! exi/5ce ( tru? is implicit4 ,! claim to real k dep5ds on ?is capacity to judge1 involves ! conception ( ! possibility ( tru? 9 ! judgm5t4 ,?is claim to be able to rea* k is no m ?an to say t ! subject c judge ( ! object1 c say t ! object is true4 ,! objects on :i* we make judgm5ts are conceptions2 ! conception is :at we "k4 ,! conception places a subject & an object aga9/ "o ano!r1 & ! judgm5t !n creates a relation betwe5 ! two4 ,! atta9m5t ( tru? simply means t ! subject c judge rightly ( ! object1 & s ! function ( mak+ judgm5ts is :at places ! ego 9 relation to ! all1 is :at makes a real unity ( ! ego & ! all possible4 ,& ?us we rea* an answ] to ! old problem z to :e!r conception or judgm5t has prec$5ce2 ! answ] is t ! two are necess>y to "o ano!r4 ,! faculty ( mak+ conceptions cleaves subject & object & unites !m aga94 ,a be+ l ! female1 )\t ! p[] ( mak+ concepts1 is unable to make judgm5ts4 ,9 h] 8m9d0 subjective & objective are n sep>at$2 !re is no possibility ( mak+ judgm5ts1 & no possibility ( rea*+1 or ( desir+1 tru?4 ,no woman is really int]e/$ 9 sci5ce2 %e may deceive h]self & _m good m51 b bad psy*ologi/s1 by ?9k+ s4 ,x may be tak5 z c]ta91 t :5ev] a woman has done some?+ ( any little importance 9 ! sci5tific _w 7,sophie ,g]ma91 ,m>y ,som]ville1 c47 x is always because ( "s man 9 ! backgr\nd :om !y desire to please 9 ?is way2 & x is m (t5 ju/ifiable to say 8*]*ez l'homme0 :]e wom5 are conc]n$ ?an 8*]*ez la femme0 9 ! case ( m54 ,b !re h nev] be5 any great discov]ies 9 ! _w ( sci5ce made by wom51 because ! facility = tru? only proce$s f a desire = tru?1 & ! =m] is always 9 proportion to ! latt]4 ,woman's s5se ( reality is mu* less ?an man's1 9 spite ( mu* repetition ( ! contr>y op9ion4 ,) wom5 ! pursuit ( k is always subord9at$ to some?+ else1 & if ?is ali5 impulse is suffici5tly /rong !y c see %>ply & un]r+ly1 b woman w nev] be able to see ! value ( tru? 9 itself & 9 relation to h] own self4 ,:]e !re is "s *eck to :at %e wi%es 7p]haps unconsci\sly7 a woman becomes q uncritical & loses all t\* ) reality4 ,?is is :y wom5 s (t5 believe !mselves to h be5 ! victims ( sexual ov]tures2 ?is is ! reason ( extreme frequ5cy ( halluc9ations ( ! s5se ( t\* 9 wom51 ( ! int5sive reality ( :i* x is almo/ impossible = a man to =m an idea4 ,?is also is :y ! imag9ation ( wom5 is compos$ ( lies & errors1 :il/ ! imag9ation ( ! philosoph] is ! highe/ =m ( tru?4 ,! idea ( tru? is ! f\ndation ( ev]y?+ t des]ves ! "n ( judgm5t4 ,k is simply ! mak+ ( judgm5ts1 & ?\ght itself is simply ano!r "n = judgm5t4 ,d$uction is ! necess>y process 9 mak+ judgm5ts1 & involves ! propositions ( id5tity & ( contradictories1 &1 z ,i h %[n1 ^! propositions are n axiomatic = wom54 ,a psy*ological pro( t ! p[] ( mak+ judgm5ts is a mascul9e trait lies 9 ! fact t ! woman recognises x z su*1 & t x acts on h] z a t]ti>y sexual "* ( ! male4 ,a woman always expects def9ite convictions 9 a man1 & appropriates !m2 %e has no und]/&+ ( indecision 9 a man4 ,%e always expects a man to talk1 & a man's spee* is to h] a sign ( 8 manl9ess4 ,x is true t woman has ! gift ( spee*1 b %e has n ! art ( talk+2 %e conv]ses 7flirts7 or *att]s1 b %e does n talk4 ,%e is mo/ dang]\s1 h[ev]1 :5 %e is dumb1 = m5 are only too incl9$ to take h] quiesc5ce = sil5ce4 ,! absolute female1 !n1 is devoid n only ( ! logical rules1 b ( ! functions ( mak+ concepts & judgm5ts :i* dep5d on !m4 ,z ! v nature ( ! conceptual faculty consi/s 9 pos+ subject aga9/ object1 & z ! subject takes its deepe/ & fulle/ mean+ f its p[] ( =m+ judgm5ts on its objects1 x is cle> t wom5 _c be recognis$ z possess+ ev5 ! subject4 ,i mu/ add to ! exposition ( ! non-logical nature ( ! female "s /atem5ts z to h] non-moral nature4 ,! pr(\nd fals5ess ( woman1 ! result ( ! want 9 h] ( a p]man5t relation to ! idea ( tru? or to ! idea ( value1 w\ld prove a subject ( discussion s exhau/ive t ,i mu/ g to "w ano!r way4 ,!re are su* endless imitations ( e?ics1 su* confus+ copies ( morality1 t wom5 are (t5 said to be on a moral plane high] ?an t ( man4 ,i h already po9t$ out ! ne$ to di/+ui% betwe5 ! non-moral & ! immoral1 & ,i n[ repeat t ) reg>d to wom5 we c talk only ( ! non-moral1 ( ! complete abs5ce ( a moral s5se4 ,x is a well-kn[n fact ( crim9al /ati/ics & ( daily life t !re are v few female crim9als4 ,! apologi/s ( ! morality ( wom5 always po9t to ?is fact4 ,b 9 decid+ ! "q z to ! morality ( wom5 we h to consid] n if a p>ticul> p]son has objectively s9n$ aga9/ ! idea1 b if ! p]son has or has n a subjective c5tre ( be+ t c ent] into a relation ) ! idea1 a relation ! value ( :i* is l[]$ :5 a s9 is committ$4 ,no d\bt ! male crim9al inh]its 8 crim9al in/9cts1 b none ! less he is consci\s--9 spite ( !ories ( 8moral insanity0--t by 8 action he has l[]$ ! value ( 8 claim on life4 ,all crim9als are c[>dly 9 ?is matt]1 & !re is none ( !m t ?9ks he has rais$ 8 value & 8 self-consci\sness by 8 crime1 or t w\ld try to ju/ify x to himself4 ,! male crim9al has f bir? a relation to ! idea ( value j l any o!r man1 b ! crim9al impulse1 :5 x succe$s 9 dom9at+ him1 de/roys ?is almo/ completely4 ,woman1 on ! contr>y1 (t5 believes h]self to h act$ ju/ly :51 z a matt] ( fact1 %e has j done ! greate/ possible act ( meanness2 :il/ ! true crim9al rema9s mute be=e reproa*1 a woman c at once give indignant expression to h] a/oni%m5t & ang] t any "o %\ld "q h] p]fect "r to act 9 ?is or t way4 ,wom5 are conv9c$ ( _! own integrity )\t ev] hav+ sat 9 judgm5t on x4 ,! crim9al does n1 x is true1 reflect on himself1 b he nev] urges 8 own integrity2 he is mu* m incl9$ to get rid ( ! ?\ght ( 8 integrity1#ac because x might rem9d him ( 8 guilt3 & 9 ?is is ! pro( t he _h a relation to ! idea 7( tru?71 & only objects to be rem9d$ ( 8 unfai?fulness to 8 bett] self4 ,no male crim9al has ev] believ$ t 8 puni%m5t 0 unju/4 ,a woman1 on ! contr>y1 is conv9c$ ( ! animosity ( h] accus]1 & if %e does n wi% to be conv9c$ ( x1 no "o c p]suade h] t %e has done wrong4 #ac ,a male crim9al ev5 feels guilty :5 he has n actually done wrong4 ,he c always accept ! reproa*es ( o!rs z to deception1 ?iev+1 & s on1 ev5 if he has nev] committ$ su* acts1 because he kn[s he is capable ( !m4 ,s also he always feels himself 8caught0 :5 any o!r (f5d] is arre/$4 ,if any "o talks to h] x usually happ5s t %e bur/s into te>s1 begs = p>don1 & 8confesses h] fault10 & may really believe t %e feels h] guilt2 b only :5 %e desires to d s1 & ! outbreak ( te>s has giv5 h] a c]ta9 sort ( satisfaction4 ,! male crim9al is call\s2 he does n sp9 r\nd 9 a trice1 z a woman w\ld d 9 a simil> in/ance if h] accus] knew h[ to h&le h] skilfully4 ,! p]sonal torture :i* arises f guilt1 :i* cries al\d 9 its angui% at hav+ br\ght su* a /a9 ^u h]self1 no woman kn[s1 & an app>5t exception 7! p5it5t1 :o becomes a self-mortify+ devotee17 w c]ta9ly prove t a woman only feels a vic>i\s guilt4 ,i am n argu+ t woman is evil & anti-moral2 ,i /ate t %e _c be really evil2 %e is m]ely non-moral4 ,womanly compassion & female mode/y are ! two o!r ph5om5a :i* are g5]ally urg$ by ! def5d]s ( female virtue4 ,x is especially f womanly k9dness1 womanly sympa?y1 t ! beautiful descriptions ( ! s\l ( woman h ga9$ mo/ support1 & ! f9al argum5t ( all belief 9 ! sup]ior morality ( woman is ! conception ( h] z ! hospital nurse1 ! t5d] si/]4 ,i am sorry to h to m5tion ?is po9t1 & %\ld n h done s1 b ,i h be5 =c$ to d s by a v]bal objection made to me1 :i* c be easily =ese54 ,x is v %ortsight$ ( any "o to consid] ! nurse z a pro( ( ! sympa?y ( wom51 because x really implies ! opposite4 ,= a man c\ld nev] /& ! sight ( ! suff]+s ( ! sick2 he w\ld suff] s int5sely t he w\ld be completely upset & incapable ( l5g?y att5dance on !m4 ,any "o :o has wat*$ nurs+ si/]s is a/\nd$ at _! equanimity & 8sweetness0 ev5 9 ! pres5ce ( mo/ t]rible dea? ?roes2 & x is well t x is s1 = man1 :o _c /& suff]+ & dea?1 w\ld make a v bad nurse4 ,a man w\ld want to assuage ! pa9 & w>d (f dea?2 9 a ^w1 he w\ld want to help2 :]e !re is no?+ to be done he is bett] away2 x is only !n t nurs+ is ju/ifi$ & t woman (f]s h]self = x4 ,b x w\ld be q wrong to reg>d ?is capacity ( wom5 9 an e?ical aspect4 ,"h x may be said t = woman ! problem ( solitude & society does n exi/4 ,%e is well adapt$ = social relations 7z1 = in/ance1 ^? ( a companion or sick-nurse71 simply because = h] !re is no transition f solitude to society4 ,9 ! case ( a man1 ! *oice betwe5 solitude & society is s]i\s :5 x has to be made4 ,! woman gives up no solitude :5 %e nurses ! sick1 z %e w\ld h to d 7 %e to des]ve moral cr$it = h] action2 a woman is nev] 9 a condition ( solitude1 & kn[s nei!r ! love ( x nor ! fe> ( x4 ,! woman is always liv+ 9 a condition ( fusion ) all ! human be+s %e kn[s1 ev5 :5 %e is alone2 %e is n a 8monad10 = all monads are %>ply m>k$ (f f o!r exi/5ces4 ,wom5 h no def9ite individual limits2 !y are n unlimit$ 9 ! s5se t g5iuses h no limits1 be+ "o ) ! :ole _w2 !y are unlimit$ only 9 ! s5se t !y are n m>k$ (f f ! common /ock ( mank9d4 ,?is s5se ( cont9uity ) ! re/ ( mank9d is a sexual "* ( ! female1 & displays itself 9 ! desire to t\*1 to be 9 contact )1 ! object ( h] pity2 ! mode 9 :i* h] t5d]ness expresses itself is a k9d ( animal s5se ( contact4 ,x %[s ! abs5ce ( ! %>p l9e t sep>ates "o real p]sonality f ano!r4 ,! woman does n respect ! sorr[ ( h] neighb\r by sil5ce2 %e tries to raise him f 8 grief by spee*1 feel+ t %e mu/ be 9 physical1 r ?an spiritual contact ) him4 ,?is diffus$ life1 "o ( ! mo/ fundam5tal qualities ( ! female nature1 is ! cause ( ! impressibility ( all wom51 _! unres]v$ & %ameless read9ess to %$ te>s on ! mo/ ord9>y occasion4 ,x is n )\t reason t we associate wail+ ) wom51 & ?9k little ( a man :o %$s te>s 9 public4 ,a woman weeps ) ^? t weep & laughs ) ^? t laugh--unless %e h]self is ! cause ( ! laught]--s t ! great] "p ( female sympa?y is ready-made4 ,x is only wom5 :o dem& pity f o!r p1 :o weep be=e !m & claim _! sympa?y4 ,?is is "o ( ! /ronge/ pieces ( evid5ce = ! psy*ical %amelessness ( wom54 ,a woman provokes ! compassion ( /rang]s 9 ord] to weep ) !m & be able to pity h]self m ?an %e already does4 ,x is n too mu* to say t ev5 :5 a woman weeps alone %e is weep+ ) ^? t %e kn[s w\ld pity h] & s int5sify+ h] self-pity by ! ?\ght ( ! pity ( o!rs4 ,self-pity is em95tly a female *>act]i/ic2 a woman w associate h]self ) o!rs1 make h]self ! object ( pity = ^! o!rs1 & !n at once1 deeply /irr$1 beg9 to weep ) !m ab\t h]self1 ! poor ?+4 ,p]haps no?+ s /irs ! feel+ ( %ame 9 a man z to detect 9 himself ! impulse t[>ds ?is self-pity1 ?is /ate ( m9d 9 :i* ! subject becomes ! object4 ,z ,s*op5hau] put x1 female sympa?y is a matt] ( sobb+ & wail+ on ! slighte/ provocation1 )\t ! smalle/ attempt to control ! emotion2 on ! o!r h&1 all true sorr[1 l true sympa?y1 j because x is real sorr[1 mu/ be res]v$2 no sorr[ c really be s res]v$ z sympa?y & love1 = ^! make u mo/ fully consci\s ( ! limits ( ea* p]sonality4 ,love & its ba%fulness w be consid]$ lat] on2 9 ! meantime let u be assur$ t 9 sympa?y1 9 g5u9e mascul9e sympa?y1 !re is always a /rong feel+ ( res]ve1 a s5se almo/ ( guilt1 because "o's fri5d is worse (f ?an oneself1 because ,i am n he1 b a be+ sep>at$ f 8 be+ by extrane\s circum/ances4 ,a man's sympa?y is ! pr9ciple ( individuality blu%+ = itself2 & h5ce man's sympa?y is res]v$ :il/ t ( woman is aggressive4 ,! exi/5ce ( mode/y 9 wom5 has be5 discuss$ already to a c]ta9 ext5t2 ,i %all h m to say ab\t x 9 relation ) hy/]ia4 ,b x is difficult to see h[ x c be ma9ta9$ t ?is is a female virtue1 if "o reflect on ! read9ess ) :i* wom5 accept ! habit ( we>+ l[-neck$ dresses :]ev] cu/om prescribes x4 ,a p]son is ei!r mode/ or immode/1 & mode/y is n a quality :i* c be assum$ or disc>d$ f h\r to h\r4 ,/rong evid5ce ( ! want ( mode/y 9 woman is to be d]iv$ f ! fact t wom5 dress & undress 9 ! pres5ce ( "o ano!r ) ! greate/ fre$om1 :il/ m5 try to avoid simil> circum/ances4 ,moreov]1 :5 wom5 are alone toge!r1 !y are v ready to discuss _! physical qualities1 especially ) reg>d to _! attractiv5ess = m52 :il/ m51 practically )\t exception1 avoid all notice ( "o ano!r's sexual *>act]s4 ,i %all return to ?is subject aga94 ,9 ! meantime ,i wi% to ref] to ! argum5t ( ! second *apt] 9 ?is connection4 ,"o mu/ be fully consci\s ( a ?+ be=e "o c h a feel+ ( %ame ab\t x1 & s diff]5tiation is z necess>y = ! s5se ( %ame z = consci\sness4 ,! female1 :o is only sexual1 c appe> to be asexual because %e is sexuality itself1 & s h] sexuality does n /& out sep>ately f ! re/ ( h] be+1 ei!r 9 space or 9 "t1 z 9 ! case ( ! male4 ,woman c give an impression ( be+ mode/ because !re is no?+ 9 h] to contra/ ) h] sexuality4 ,& s ! woman is always nak$ or nev] nak$--we may express x ei!r way--nev] nak$1 because ! true feel+ ( nak$ness is impossible to h]2 always nak$1 because !re is n 9 h] ! mat]ial = ! s5se ( relativity by :i* %e c\ld become aw>e ( h] nak$ness & s make possible ! desire to cov] x4 ,:at ,i h be5 discuss+ dep5ds on ! actual mean+ ( ! ^w 8ego0 to a woman4 ,if a woman 7 ask$ :at %e meant by h] 8ego0 %e w\ld c]ta9ly ?9k ( h] body4 ,h] sup]ficies1 t is ! woman's ego4 ,! ego ( ! female is q correctly describ$ by ,ma* 9 8 8,anti-metaphysical ,rem>ks40 ,! ego ( a woman is ! cause ( ! vanity :i* is specific ( wom54 ,! analogue ( ?is 9 ! male is an emanation ( ! set ( 8 w t[>ds 8 conception ( ! good1 & its objective expression is a s5sitiv5ess1 a desire t no "o %all call 9 "q ! possibility ( atta9+ ?is supreme good4 ,x is 8 p]sonality t gives to man 8 value & 8 fre$om f ! conditions ( "t4 ,?is supreme good1 :i* is beyond price1 because1 9 ! words ( ,kant1 !re c be f\nd no equival5t = x1 is ! dignity ( man4 ,wom51 9 spite ( :at ,s*ill] has said1 h no dignity1 & ! ^w 8lady0 0 inv5t$ to supply ?is defect1 & h] pride w f9d its expression 9 :at %e reg>ds z ! supreme good1 t is to say1 9 ! pres]vation1 improvem5t1 & display ( h] p]sonal beauty4 ,! pride ( ! female is some?+ q peculi> to h]self1 some?+ =eign ev5 to ! mo/ h&some man1 an obsession by h] own body2 a pleasure :i* displays itself1 ev5 9 ! lea/ h&some girl1 by admir+ h]self 9 ! mirror1 by /rok+ h]self & play+ ) h] own hair1 b :i* comes to its full measure only 9 ! effect t h] body has on man4 ,a woman has no true solitude1 because %e is always consci\s ( h]self only 9 relation to o!rs4 ,! o!r side ( ! vanity ( wom5 is ! desire to feel t h] body is admir$1 or1 r1 sexually covet$1 by a man4 ,?is desire is s /rong t !re are _m wom5 to :om x is suffici5t m]ely to "k t !y are covet$4 ,! vanity ( wom5 is1 !n1 always 9 relation to o!rs2 a woman lives only 9 ! ?\ghts ( o!rs ab\t h]4 ,! s5sibility ( wom5 is direct$ to ?is4 ,a woman nev] =gets t "s "o ?\ght h] ugly2 a woman nev] consid]s h]self ugly2 ! successes ( o!rs at ! mo/ only make h] ?9k ( h]self z p]haps less attractive4 ,b no woman ev] believes h]self to be any?+ b beautiful & desirable :5 %e looks at h]self 9 ! glass2 %e nev] accepts h] own ugl9ess z a pa9ful reality z a man w\ld1 & nev] ceases to try to p]suade o!rs ( ! contr>y4 ,:at is ! s\rce ( ?is =m ( vanity1 peculi> to ! female8 ,x comes f ! abs5ce ( an intelligible ego1 ! only begett] ( a con/ant & positive s5se ( value2 x is1 9 fact1 t %e is devoid ( a s5se ( p]sonal value4 ,z %e sets no /ore by h]self or on h]self1 %e endeav\rs to atta9 to a value 9 ! eyes ( o!rs by excit+ _! desire & admiration4 ,! only ?+ :i* has any absolute & ultimate value 9 ! _w is ! s\l4 8,ye are bett] ?an _m sp>r[s0 7 ,*ri/'s words to mank9d4 ,a woman does n value h]self by ! con/ancy & fre$om ( h] p]sonality2 b ?is is ! only possible me?od = e creature possess+ an ego4 ,b if a real woman1 & ?is is c]ta9ly ! case1 c only value h]self at ! rate ( ! man :o has fix$ 8 *oice on h]2 if x is only ?r\gh h] husb& or lov] t %e c atta9 to a value n only 9 social & mat]ial ?+s1 b also 9 h] inn]mo/ nature1 x foll[s t %e possesses no p]sonal value1 %e is devoid ( man's s5se ( ! value ( 8 own p]sonality = itself4 ,& s wom5 always get _! s5se ( value f some?+ outside !mselves1 f _! money or e/ates1 ! numb] & ri*ness ( _! g>m5ts1 ! position ( _! box at ! op]a1 _! *ildr51 &1 above all1 _! husb&s or lov]s4 ,:5 a woman is qu>rell+ ) ano!r woman1 h] f9al weapon1 & ! weapon %e f9ds mo/ effective & discomfit+1 is to proclaim h] sup]ior social position1 h] weal? or title1 &1 above all1 h] y\?fulness & ! devotion ( h] husb& or lov]2 :]eas a man 9 simil> case w\ld lay himself op5 to contempt if he reli$ on any?+ except 8 own p]sonal individuality4 ,! abs5ce ( ! s\l 9 woman may also be inf]r$ f ! foll[+3 ,:il/ a woman is /imulat$ to try to impress a man f ! m]e fact t he has paid no att5tion to h] 7,goe! gave ?is z a practical receipt71 ! :ole life ( a woman1 9 fact1 be+ an expression ( ?is side ( h] nature1 a man1 if a woman treats him rudely or indiff]5tly1 feels repell$ by h]4 ,no?+ makes a man s happy z ! love ( a girl2 ev5 if he did n at fir/ return h] love1 !re is a great probability ( love be+ ar\s$ 9 him4 ,! love ( a man = :om %e does n c>e is only a gratification ( ! vanity ( a woman1 or an awak5+ & r\s+ ( slumb]+ desires4 ,a woman ext5ds h] claims equally to all m5 on e>?4 ,! %amelessness & he>tlessness ( wom5 are %[n 9 ! way 9 :i* !y talk ( be+ lov$4 ,a man feels a%am$ ( be+ lov$1 because he is always 9 ! position ( be+ ! active1 free ag5t1 & because he kn[s t he c nev] give himself entirely to love1 & !re is no?+ ab\t :i* he is s sil5t1 ev5 :5 !re is no special reason = him to fe> t he might compromise ! lady by talk+4 ,a woman boa/s ab\t h] love affairs1 & p>ades !m be=e o!r wom5 9 ord] to make !m envi\s ( h]4 ,woman does n look ^u a man's incl9ation = h] s mu* z a tribute to h] actual wor?1 or a deep insight into h] nature1 z ! be/[+ a value on h] :i* %e o!rwise w\ld n h1 z ! gift to h] ( an exi/5ce & ess5ce ) :i* %e ju/ifies h]self be=e o!rs4 ,! rem>k 9 an e>li] *apt] ab\t ! unfail+ memory ( woman = all ! complim5ts %e has ev] receiv$ s9ce *ildhood is expla9$ by ! =ego+ facts4 ,x is f complim5ts1 fir/ ( all1 t woman gets a s5se ( h] 8value10 & t is :y wom5 expect m5 to be 8polite40 ,polit5ess is ! easie/ =m ( pleas+ a woman1 & h[ev] little x co/s a man x is de> to a woman1 :o nev] =gets an att5tion1 & lives ^u ! mo/ insipid flatt]y1 ev5 9 h] old age4 ,"o only rememb]s :at possesses a value 9 "o's eyes2 x may safely be said t x is = complim5ts wom5 h ! mo/ develop$ memory4 ,! woman c atta9 a s5se ( value by ^! ext]nal aids1 because %e does n possess )9 h] an inn] /&>d ( value :i* dim9i%es ev]y?+ outside h]4 ,! ph5om5a ( c\rtesy & *ivalry are simply additional pro(s t wom5 h no s\ls1 & t :5 a man is be+ 8polite0 to a woman he is simply ascrib+ to h] ! m9imum s5se ( p]sonal value1 a =m ( def]5ce to :i* importance is atta*$ precisely 9 ! measure t x is misund]/ood4 ,! non-moral nature ( woman reveals itself 9 ! mode 9 :i* %e c s easily =get an immoral action %e has committ$4 ,x is almo/ *>act]i/ic ( a woman t %e _c believe t %e has done wrong1 & s is able to deceive bo? h]self & h] husb&4 ,m51 on ! o!r h&1 rememb] no?+ s well z ! guilty episodes ( _! lives4 ,"h memory reveals itself z em95tly a moral ph5om5on4 ,=giv+ & =gett+1 n =giv+ & und]/&+1 g toge!r4 ,:5 "o rememb]s a lie1 "o reproa*es oneself afre% ab\t x4 ,a woman =gets1 because %e does n blame h]self = an act ( meanness1 because %e does n und]/& x1 hav+ no relation to ! moral idea4 ,x is n surpris+ t %e is ready to lie4 ,wom5 h be5 reg>d$ z virtu\s1 simply because ! problem ( morality has n pres5t$ itself to !m2 !y h be5 held to be ev5 m moral ?an man2 ?is is simply because !y d n und]/& immorality4 ,! innoc5ce ( a *ild is n m]itori\s2 if a patri>* c\ld be innoc5t he might be prais$ = x4 ,introspection is an attribute conf9$ to males1 if we leave out ( acc\nt ! hy/]ical self-reproa*es ( c]ta9 wom5--& consci\sness ( guilt & rep5tance are equally male4 ,! p5ances t wom5 lay on !mselves1 rem>kable imitations ( ! s5se ( guilt1 w be discuss$ :5 ,i come to deal ) :at passes = introspection 9 ! female sex4 ,! 8subject0 ( introspection is ! moral ag5t2 x has a relation to psy*ical ph5om5a only 9 s f> z x sits 9 judgm5t on !m4 ,x is q 9 ! nature ( positivism t ,comte d5ies ! possibility ( introspection1 & ?r[s ridicule on x4 ,= c]ta9ly x is absurd t a psy*ical ev5t & a judgm5t ( x c\ld co9cide if ! int]pretations ( ! positivi/s be accept$4 ,x is only on ! assumption t !re exi/s an ego uncondition$ by "t & intr9sically capable ( moral judgm5ts1 end[$ ) memory & ) ! p[] ( mak+ comp>isons1 t we c ju/ify ! belief 9 ! possibility ( introspection4 ,if woman _h a s5se ( h] p]sonal value & ! w to def5d x aga9/ all ext]nal attacks %e c\ld n be jeal\s4 ,app>5tly all wom5 are jeal\s1 & jeal\sy dep5ds on ! failure to recognise ! rights ( o!rs4 ,ev5 ! jeal\sy ( a "m :5 %e sees ano!r woman's daught]s m>ri$ be=e h] own dep5ds simply on h] want ( ! s5se ( ju/ice4 ,)\t ju/ice !re c be no society1 s t jeal\sy is an absolutely unsocial quality4 ,! =mation ( societies 9 reality presupposes ! exi/5ce ( true individuality4 ,woman has no faculty = ! affairs ( ,/ate or politics1 z %e has no social incl9ations2 & wom5's societies1 f :i* m5 are exclud$1 are c]ta9 to break up aft] a %ort "t4 ,! family itself is n really a social /ructure2 x is ess5tially unsocial1 & m5 :o give up _! clubs & societies aft] m>riage soon rejo9 !m4 ,i _h writt5 ?is be=e ! appe>ance ( ,he9ri* ,s*urtz' valuable e?nological "w1 9 :i* he %[s t associations ( m51 & n ! family1 =m ! beg9n+s ( society4 ,pascal made ! wond]ful rem>k t human be+s seek society only because !y _c be> solitude & wi% to =get !mselves4 ,x is ! fact express$ 9 ^! words :i* puts 9 h>mony my e>li] /atem5t t wom5 _h n ! faculty ( solitude & my pres5t /atem5t t %e is ess5tially unsociable4 ,if a woman possess$ an 8ego0 %e w\ld h ! s5se ( prop]ty bo? 9 h] own case & t ( o!rs4 ,! ?iev+ in/9ct1 h[ev]1 is mu* m develop$ 9 m5 ?an 9 wom54 ,s-call$ 8kleptomaniacs0 7^? :o /eal )\t necessity7 are almo/ exclusively wom54 ,wom5 und]/& p[] & ri*es b n p]sonal prop]ty4 ,:5 ! !fts ( female kleptomaniacs are discov]$1 ! wom5 def5d !mselves by say+ t x appe>$ to !m z if ev]y?+ belong$ to !m4 ,x is *iefly wom5 :o use circulat+ libr>ies1 especially ^? :o c\ld q well af=d to buy quantities ( books2 b1 z matt] ( fact1 !y are n m /rongly attract$ by :at !y h b\ght ?an by :at !y h borr[$4 ,9 all ^! matt]s ! relation betwe5 individuality & society comes into view2 j z a man mu/ h p]sonality himself to appreciate ! p]sonalities ( o!rs1 s also he mu/ acquire a s5se ( p]sonal "r 9 8 own prop]ty to respect ! rights ( o!rs4 ,"o's "n & a /rong devotion to x are ev5 m dep5d5t on p]sonality ?an is ! s5se ( prop]ty4 ,! facts t confront u ) ref]5ce to ?is are s sali5t t x is extraord9>y to f9d s little notice tak5 ( !m4 ,wom5 are n b\nd to _! names ) any /rong bond4 ,:5 !y m>ry !y give up _! own "n & assume t ( _! husb& )\t any s5se ( loss4 ,!y all[ _! husb&s & lov]s to call !m by new names1 delight+ 9 !m2 & ev5 :5 a woman m>ries a man t %e does n love1 %e has nev] be5 kn[n to suff] any psy*ical %ock at ! *ange ( "n4 ,! "n is a symbol ( individuality2 x is only among/ ! l[e/ races on ! face ( ! e>?1 su* z ! bu%m5 ( ,s\? ,africa1 t !re are no p]sonal names1 because among/ su* z ^! ! desire = di/+ui%+ individuals f ! g5]al /ock is n felt4 ,! fundam5tal namelessness ( ! woman is simply a sign ( h] undiff]5tiat$ p]sonality4 ,an important obs]vation may be m5tion$ "h & may be confirm$ by e "o4 ,:5ev] a man ent]s a place :]e a woman is1 & %e obs]ves him1 or he>s 8 /ep1 or ev5 only guesses he is ne>1 %e becomes ano!r p]son4 ,h] expression & h] pose *ange ) incr$ible swiftness2 %e 8arranges h] fr+e0 & h] bodice1 & rises1 or pret5ds to be engross$ 9 h] "w4 ,%e is full ( a half-%ameless1 half-n]v\s expectation4 ,9 _m cases "o is only 9 d\bt z to :e!r %e is blu%+ = h] %ameless laugh1 or laugh+ ov] h] %ameless blu%+4 ,! s\l1 p]sonality1 "*--z ,s*op5hau] ) m>vell\s sight recognis$--are id5tical ) free-w4 ,& z ! female has no ego1 %e has no free-w4 ,only a creature ) no w ( its own1 no "* 9 ! highe/ s5se1 c\ld be s easily influ5c$ by ! m]e proximity to a man z woman is1 :o rema9s 9 functional dep5d5ce on him in/ead ( 9 free relation%ip to him4 ,woman is ! be/ m$ium1 ! male h] be/ hypnotis]4 ,= ?is reason alone x is inconceivable :y wom5 c be consid]$ good z doctors2 = _m doctors admit t _! pr9cipal "w up to ! pres5t--& x w always be ! same--lies 9 ! sugge/ive influ5ce on _! pati5ts4 ,! female is uni=mly m easily hypnotis$ ?an ! male ?r\gh\t ! animal _w1 & x may be se5 f ! foll[+ h[ closely hypnotic ph5om5a are relat$ to ! mo/ ord9>y ev5ts4 ,i h already describ$1 9 discuss+ female sympa?y1 h[ easy x is = laught] or te>s to be induc$ 9 females4 ,h[ impress$ %e is by ev]y?+ 9 ! newspap]s6 ,:at a m>tyr %e is to ! sillie/ sup]/itions6 ,h[ eag]ly %e tries e rem$y recomm5d$ by h] fri5ds6 ,:oev] is lack+ 9 "* is lack+ 9 convictions4 ,! female1 !re=e1 is cr$ul\s1 uncritical1 & q unable to und]/& ,prote/antism4 ,*ri/ians are ,ca?olics or ,prote/ants be=e !y are baptiz$1 b1 none ! less1 x w\ld be unfair to describe ,ca?olicism z fem99e simply because x suits wom5 bett]4 ,! di/9ction betwe5 ! ,ca?olic & ,prote/ant dispositions is a side ( *>act]ology t w\ld require sep>ate treatm5t4 ,x has be5 exhau/ively prov$ t ! female is s\lless & possesses nei!r ego nor individuality1 p]sonality nor fre$om1 "* nor w4 ,?is conclusion is ( ! highe/ significance 9 psy*ology4 ,x implies t ! psy*ology ( ! male & ( ! female mu/ be treat$ sep>ately4 ,a purely empirical repres5tation ( ! psy*ic life ( ! female is possible2 9 ! case ( ! male1 all ! psy*ic life mu/ be consid]$ ) ref]5ce to ! ego1 z ,kant =esaw4 ,! view ( ,hume 7& ,ma*71 :i* only admits t !re are 8impressions0 & 8?\ghts0 7,,abc & 44471 & :i* has almo/ driv5 ! psy*e out ( pres5t day psy*ology1 decl>es t ! :ole _w is to be consid]$ exclusively z a picture 9 a reflector1 a sort ( kaleidoscope2 x m]ely r$uces ev]y?+ to a dance ( ! 8elem5ts10 )\t ?\ght or ord]2 x d5ies ! possibility ( obta9+ a secure /&po9t = ?\ght2 x n only de/roys ! idea ( tru?1 & accord+ly ( reality1 ! only claims on :i* philosophy re/s1 b x also is to blame = ! wret*$ plight ( mod]n psy*ology4 ,?is mod]n psy*ology pr\dly /yles itself ! 8psy*ology )\t ! s\l10 9 imitation ( its mu* ov]-rat$ f\nd]1 ,fri$ri* ,alb]t ,lange4 ,i ?9k ,i h prov$ 9 ?is "w t )\t ! ackn[l$gm5t ( a s\l !re w\ld be no way ( deal+ ) psy*ic ph5om5a2 j z mu* 9 ! case ( ! male :o has a s\l z 9 ! case ( ! female :o is s\lless4 ,mod]n psy*ology is em95tly womani%1 & t is :y ?is comp>ative inve/igation ( ! sexes is s specially in/ructive1 & x is n )\t reason t ,i h delay$ po9t+ out ?is radical diff]5ce2 x is only n[ t x c be se5 :at ! acceptation ( ! ego implies1 & h[ ! confus+ ( mascul9e & fem99e spiritual life 79 ! broade/ & deepe/ s5se7 has be5 at ! root ( all ! difficulties & errors into :i* ^? :o h s\ght to e/abli% a univ]sal psy*ology h fall54 ,i mu/ n[ raise ! "q--is a psy*ology ( ! male possible z a sci5ce8 ,! answ] mu/ be t x is n possible4 ,i mu/ be und]/ood to reject all ! inve/igations ( ! exp]im5t]s1 & ^? :o are /ill sick ) ! exp]im5tal fev] may ask 9 wond] if all ^! h no value8 ,exp]im5tal psy*ology has n giv5 a s+le explanation z to ! deep] laws ( mascul9e life2 x c be reg>d$ only z a s]ies ( sporadic empirical ef=ts1 & its me?od is wrong inasmu* z x seeks to rea* ! k]nel ( ?+s by surface exam9ation1 & z x _c possibly give an explanation ( ! deep-seat$ s\rce ( all psy*ical ph5om5a4 ,:5 x has attempt$ to discov] ! real nature ( psy*ical ph5om5a by measurem5ts ( ! physical ph5om5a t accompany !m1 x has succe$$ 9 %[+ t ev5 9 ! mo/ fav\rable cases !re is an incon/ancy & v>iation4 ,! fundam5tal possibility ( rea*+ ! ma!matical idea ( k is t ! data %\ld be con/ant4 ,z ! m9d itself is ! creator ( "t & space1 x is impossible to expect t geometry & ari?metic %\ld expla9 ! m9d1 t ! creature %\ld expla9 ! creator4 ,!re c be no sci5tific psy*ology ( man1 = ! aim ( psy*ology is to d]ive :at is n d]ivative1 to prove to e man :at 8 real nature & ess5ce are1 to d$uce ^!4 ,b ! possibility ( d$uc+ !m w\ld imply t !y 7 n free4 ,z soon z x has be5 admitt$ t ! conduct1 action1 nature1 ( an individual man c be det]m9$ sci5tifically1 x w be prov$ t man has no free-w4 ,kant & ,s*op5hau] und]/ood ?is fully1 &1 on ! o!r h&1 ,hume & ,h]b>t1 ! f\nd]s ( mod]n psy*ology1 did n believe 9 free-w4 ,x is ?is dilemma t is ! cause ( ! pitiful relation ( mod]n psy*ology to all fundam5tal que/ions4 ,! wild & repeat$ ef=ts to d]ive ! w f psy*ological factors1 f p]ception & feel+1 are 9 !mselves evid5ce t x _c be tak5 z an empirical factor4 ,! w1 l ! p[] ( judgm5t1 is associat$ inevitably ) ! exi/5ce ( an ego1 or s\l4 ,x is n a matt] ( exp]i5ce1 x transc5ds exp]i5ce1 & until psy*ology recognises ?is extrane\s factor1 x w rema9 no m ?an a me?odical annex ( physiology & biology4 ,if ! s\l is only a complex ( exp]i5ces x _c be ! factor t makes exp]i5ces possible4 ,mod]n psy*ology 9 reality d5ies ! exi/5ce ( ! s\l1 b ! s\l rejects mod]n psy*ology4 ,?is "w has decid$ 9 fav\r ( ! s\l aga9/ ! absurd & pitiable psy*ology )\t a s\l4 ,9 fact1 x may be d\bt$ if1 on ! assumption t ! s\l exi/s & has free ?\ght & free-w1 !re c be a sci5ce ( causal laws & self-impos$ rules ( will+ & ?9k+4 ,i h no int5tion ( try+ to inaugurate a new era ( rational psy*ology4 ,i wi% to foll[ ,kant 9 posit+ ! exi/5ce ( a s\l z ! unify+ & c5tral conception1 )\t :i* any explanation or description ( psy*ic life1 h[ev] fai?ful 9 its details1 h[ev] sympa!tically und]tak51 mu/ be :olly unsatisfy+4 ,x is extraord9>y h[ inquir]s :o h made no attempt to analyse su* ph5om5a z %ame & ! s5se ( guilt1 fai? & hope1 fe> & rep5tance1 love & hate1 ye>n+ & solitude1 vanity & s5sitiv5ess1 ambition & ! desire = immortality1 h yet ! c\rage simply to d5y ! ego because x does n flaunt itself l ! col\r ( an orange or ! ta/e ( a pea*4 ,h[ c ,ma* & ,hume acc\nt = su* a ?+ z /yle1 if individuality does n exi/8 ,or aga91 consid] ?is3 no animal is made afraid by see+ its reflection 9 a glass1 :il/ !re is no man :o c\ld sp5d 8 life 9 a room surr\nd$ ) mirrors4 ,c ?is fe>1 ! fe> ( ! doppelgang]1#ad be expla9$ on ,d>w9ian pr9ciples8 ,! ^w doppelgang] has only to be m5tion$ to raise a deep dread 9 ! m9d ( any man4 ,empirical psy*ology _c expla9 ?is2 x rea*es ! dep?s4 ,x _c be expla9$1 z ,ma* w\ld expla9 ! fe> ( little *ildr51 z an inh]itance f "s primitive1 less secure /age ( society4 ,i h tak5 ?is example only to rem9d ! empirical psy*ologi/s t !re are _m ?+s inexplicable on _! hypo!ses4 #ad ,x is notable t wom5 are devoid ( ?is fe>2 female doppelgang]s are n he>d (4 ,:y is any man annoy$ :5 he is describ$ z a ,wagn]ite1 a ,nietz*ite1 a ,h]b>tian1 or s =?8 ,he objects to be ?\ght a m]e e*o4 ,ev5 ,ern/ ,ma* is angry 9 anticipation at ! ?\ght t "s fri5d w describe him z a ,positivi/1 ,ideali/1 or any o!r non-individual t]m4 ,?is feel+ mu/ n be confus$ ) ! results ( ! fact t a man may describe himself z a ,wagn]ite1 & s =?4 ,! latt] is simply a deep approval ( ,wagn]ism1 because ! approv] is himself a ,wagn]ite4 ,! man is consci\s t 8 agreem5t is 9 reality a rais+ ( ! value ( ,wagn]ism4 ,& s also a man w say mu* ab\t himself t he w\ld n p]mit ano!r to say ( him4 ,z ,cyrano de ,b]g]ac put x3 8,je me les s]s moi-mme1 avec assez de v]ve1 ,mais je ne p]mets pas qu'un autre me les s]ve40 ,x _c be "r to consid] su* m5 z ,pascal & ,newton1 on ! "o h&1 z m5 ( ! highe/ g5ius1 on ! o!r1 z limit$ by a mass ( prejudices :i* we ( ! pres5t g5]ation h long ov]come4 ,is ! pres5t g5]ation ) its electrical railways & empirical psy*ology s mu* high] ?an ^! e>li] times8 ,is culture1 if culture has any real value1 to be comp>$ ) sci5ce1 :i* is always social & nev] individual1 & to be measur$ by ! numb] ( public libr>ies & laboratories8 ,is culture outside human be+s & n always 9 human be+s8 ,x is 9 /rik+ h>mony ) ! ascription to m5 alone ( an ineffable1 inexplicable p]sonality1 t 9 all ! au!nticat$ cases ( d\ble or multiple p]sonality ! subjects h be5 wom54 ,! absolute female is capable ( sub-division2 ! male1 ev5 to ! mo/ complete *>act]ology & ! mo/ acute exp]im5t1 is always an indivisible unit4 ,! male has a c5tral nucleus ( 8 be+ :i* has no p>ts1 & _c be divid$2 ! female is composite1 & s c be dissociat$ & cleft4 ,& s x is mo/ amus+ to he> writ]s talk+ ( ! s\l ( ! woman1 ( h] he>t & its my/]ies1 ( ! psy*e ( ! mod]n woman4 ,x seems almo/ z if ev5 an acc\*eur w\ld h to prove 8 capacity by ! /r5g? ( 8 belief 9 ! s\l ( wom54 ,mo/ wom51 at lea/1 delight to he> discussions on _! s\ls1 al?\gh !y "k1 s f> z !y c be said to "k any?+1 t ! :ole ?+ is a sw9dle4 ,! woman z ! ,sph9x6 ,nev] 0 a m ridicul\s1 a m audaci\s fraud p]petrat$4 ,man is inf9itely m my/]i\s1 incomp>ably m complicat$4 ,x is only necess>y to look at ! faces ( wom5 "o passes 9 ! /reets4 ,!re is sc>cely "o ^: expression c\ld n at once be summ$ up4 ,! regi/] ( woman's feel+s & disposition is s t]ribly poor1 :]eas m5's c\nt5ances c sc>cely be read aft] long & e>ne/ scrut9y4 ,f9ally1 ,i come to ! "q z to :e!r !re exi/s a complete p>allelism or a condition ( reciprocal int]action betwe5 m9d & body4 ,9 ! case ( ! female1 psy*o-physical p>allelism exi/s 9 ! =m ( a complete co-ord9ation betwe5 ! m5tal & ! physical2 9 wom5 ! capacity = m5tal ex]tion ceases ) s5ile involution1 j z x develop$ 9 connection ) & 9 subs]vi5ce to ! sexual in/9cts4 ,! intellig5ce ( man nev] gr[s z old z t ( ! woman1 & x is only 9 isolat$ cases t deg5]ation ( ! m9d is l9k$ ) deg5]ation ( ! body4 ,lea/ ( all does m5tal deg5]ation accompany ! bodily weakness ( old age 9 ^? :o h g5ius1 ! highe/ developm5t ( m5tal mascul9ity4 ,x is only to be expect$ t ! philosoph]s :o mo/ /rongly argu$ 9 fav\r ( p>allelism1 su* z ,sp9oza & ,fe*n]1 7 also det]m9i/s4 ,9 ! case ( ! male1 ! free intelligible ag5t :o by 8 own w c di/+ui% betwe5 good & evil1 ! exi/5ce ( p>allelism betwe5 m9d & body mu/ be reject$4 ,! "q1 !n1 z to ! prop] view ( ! psy*ology ( ! sexes may be tak5 z settl$4 ,!re has to be fac$1 h[ev]1 an extraord9>ily difficult problem t1 s f> z ,i "k1 has n ev5 be5 /at$ yet1 b ! answ] to :i*1 none ! less1 /rongly supports my view ( ! s\llessness ( wom54 ,9 ! e>li] pages ( my volume ,i contra/$ ! cl>ity ( male ?9k+ processes ) _! vagu5ess 9 woman1 & lat] on %[$ t ! p[] ( ord]ly spee*1 9 :i* logical judgm5ts are express$1 acts on wom5 z a male sexual "*4 ,:atev] is sexually attractive to ! female mu/ be *>act]i/ic ( ! male4 ,firmness 9 a man's "* makes a sexual impression on a woman1 :il/ %e is repell$ by ! pliant man4 ,p (t5 speak ( ! moral influ5ce ex]t$ on m5 by wom51 :5 no m is meant ?an t wom5 are /riv+ to atta9 _! sexual complem5ts4 ,wom5 dem& manl9ess f m51 & feel deeply disappo9t$ & full ( contempt if m5 fail !m 9 ?is respect4 ,h[ev] untru?ful or great a flirt a woman may be1 %e is bitt]ly indignant if %e discov] traces ( coquetry or untru?fulness 9 a man4 ,%e may be z c[>dly z %e likes1 b ! man mu/ be brave4 ,x has be5 almo/ completely ov]look$ t ?is is only a sexual egotism seek+ to secure ! mo/ satisfactory sexual complem5t4 ,f ! side ( empirical obs]vation1 no /rong] pro( ( ! s\llessness ( woman c\ld be drawn ?an t %e dem&s a s\l 9 man1 t %e :o is n good 9 h]self dem&s goodness f him4 ,! s\l is a mascul9e "*1 pleas+ to wom5 9 ! same way & = ! same purpose z a mascul9e body or a well-trimm$ m\/a*e4 ,i may be accus$ ( /at+ ! case co>sely1 b x is none ! less true4 ,x is ! man's w t 9 ! la/ resort influ5ces a woman mo/ p[]fully1 & %e has a /rong faculty = p]ceiv+ :e!r a man's 8,i w0 means m]e bomba/ or actual decision4 ,9 ! latt] case ! effect on h] is prodigi\s4 ,h[ is x t woman1 :o is s\lless h]self1 c disc]n ! s\l 9 man8 ,h[ c %e judge ab\t 8 morality :o is h]self non-moral8 ,h[ c %e grasp 8 "* :5 %e has no "* h]self8 ,h[ appreciate 8 w :5 %e is h]self )\t w8 ,^! difficult problems lie be=e u1 & _! solutions mu/ be plac$ on /rong f\ndations1 = !re w be _m attempts to de/roy !m4 ,,*apt] ,x ,,mo!rhood ,,& ,,pro/itution ,! *ief objection t w be urg$ aga9/ my views is t !y _c possibly be valid = all wom54 ,= "s1 or ev5 = ! majority1 !y w be accept$ z true1 b = ! re/---- ,x 0 n my orig9al int5tion to deal ) ! diff]5t k9ds ( wom54 ,wom5 may be reg>d$ f _m diff]5t po9ts ( view1 &1 ( c\rse1 c>e mu/ be tak5 n to press too h>dly :at is true = "o extreme type4 ,if ! ^w "* be accept$ 9 its common1 empirical signification1 !n !re are diff]5ces 9 wom5's *>act]s4 ,all ! prop]ties ( ! male "* f9d rem>kable analogies 9 ! female sex 7an int]e/+ case w be dealt ) lat] on 9 ?is *apt]72 b 9 ! male ! "* is always deeply root$ 9 ! sph]e ( ! intelligible1 f :i* !re has come ab\t ! lam5table confusion betwe5 ! doctr9e ( ! s\l & *>act]ology4 ,! *>act]ological diff]5ces among/ wom5 are n root$ s deeply t !y c develop into individuality2 & probably !re is no female quality t 9 ! c\rse ( ! life ( a woman _c be modifi$1 repress$1 or annihilat$ by ! w ( a man4 ,h[ f> su* diff]5ces 9 "* may exi/ 9 cases t h ! same degree ( mascul9ity or ( fem99ity ,i h n yet be5 at ! pa9s to inquire4 ,i h refra9$ delib]ately f ?is task1 because 9 my desire to prep>e ! way = a true ori5tation ( all ! difficult problems connect$ ) my subject ,i h be5 anxi\s n to raise side issues or to burd5 ! argum5t ) collat]al details4 ,! detail$ *>act]ology ( wom5 mu/ wait = a detail$ treatm5t1 b ev5 ?is "w has n totally neglect$ ! diff]5ces t exi/ among/ wom52 ,i %all hope to be acquitt$ ( false g5]alisations if x be rememb]$ t :at ,i h be5 say+ relates to ! female elem5t1 & is true 9 ! same proportion t wom5 possess t elem5t4 ,h[ev]1 z x is q c]ta9 t a p>ticul> type ( woman w be br\ght =w>d 9 opposition to my conclusions1 x is necess>y to consid] c>efully t type & its contra/+ type4 ,to all ! bad & defamatory ?+s t ,i h said ab\t wom51 ! conception ( woman z a "m w c]ta9ly be oppos$4 ,b ^? :o adduce ?is argum5t w admit ! ju/ice ( a simultane\s consid]ation ( ! type t is at ! opposite pole f mo!rhood1 z only 9 ?is way is x possible to def9e cle>ly 9 :at mo!rhood consi/s & to delimit x f o!r types4 ,! type /&+ at ! pole opposite to mo!rhood is ! pro/itute4 ,! contra/ is n any m inevitable ?an ! contra/ betwe5 man & woman1 & c]ta9 limits & re/rictions w h to be made4 ,b all[+ = ^!1 wom5 w n[ be treat$ z fall+ into two types1 sometimes hav+ 9 !m m ( ! "o type1 sometimes m ( ! o!r4 ,?is di*otomy may be misund]/ood if ,i d n di/+ui% x f a contra/ t is popul>ly made4 ,x is (t5 said t a woman %\ld be bo? "m & mi/ress4 ,i d n see ! s5se or ! utility ( ! di/9ction involv$ 9 ! phrase4 ,is no m meant by 8mi/ress0 ?an ! condition :i* ( necessity mu/ prec$e mo!rhood8 ,if t is s1 !n no la/+ *>act]ological prop]ty is involv$4 ,= ! ^w 8mi/ress0 tells u no?+ ab\t a woman except t %e is 9 a c]ta9 relation to a man4 ,x has no?+ to d ) h] real be+2 x is some?+ impos$ on h] f )\t4 ,! conception ( be+ lov$ tells u no?+ ab\t ! nature ( ! p]son :o is lov$4 ,! condition ( be+ lov$1 :e!r z "m or mi/ress1 is a m]ely accid5tal1 ext]nal designation ( ! individual1 :]eas ! quality ( mo!rhood is some?+ born 9 a woman1 some?+ deep-seat$ 9 h] nature4 ,x is ?is some?+ t we mu/ inve/igate4 ,t mo!rhood & pro/itution are at extreme poles appe>s probable simply f ! fact t mo!rly wom5 be> f> m *ildr51 :il/ ! frivol\s h few *ildr51 & pro/itutes are practically /]ile4 ,x mu/ be rememb]$1 ( c\rse1 t x is n only pro/itutes :o belong to ! pro/itute type2 v _m s-call$ respectable girls & m>ri$ wom5 belong to x4 ,accurate analysis ( ! type w %[ t x rea*es f> beyond ! m]e wom5 ( ! /reets4 ,! /reet-walk] diff]s f ! respectable coquette & ! celebrat$ hetaira only ?r\gh h] incapacity = diff]5tiation1 h] complete want ( memory1 & h] habit ( liv+ f mom5t to mom5t4 ,if !re 7 b "o man & "o woman on ! e>?1 ! pro/itute type w\ld reveal itself 9 ! relations ( ! woman to ! man4 ,?is fact ( limit$ f]tility ought by itself to relieve me f ! necessity ( comp>+ my view ( pro/itution ) ! popul> view t w\ld d]ive :at is really deep-seat$ 9 ! nature ( wom5 f m]e social conditions1 f ! pov]ty ( wom5 & ! economic /ress ( a society arrang$ by males1 f ! difficulty ( wom5 succe$+ 9 a respectable c>e]1 or f ! exi/5ce ( a l>ge ba*elor class ) ! consequ5t dem& = a sy/em ( pro/itution4 ,to ^! sugge/ions x may well be repli$ t pro/itution is by no means conf9$ to ! poor] classes2 t wom5 )\t any economic necessity h frequ5tly giv5 way to its appeal2 t !re are _m situations 9 %ops1 (fices1 po/-(fices1 ! telegraph & telephone s]vices1 :]ev] m]e me*anical ability is requir$1 :]e wom5 are pref]r$ because1 f _! l[] degree ( diff]5tiation1 _! dem&s are small]2 & bus9ess m5 hav+ discov]$ ?is 9 anticipation ( sci5ce1 readily employ !m at a l[] rate ( wages4 ,"y pro/itutes h (t5 q z h>d an economic battle to fight1 z !y mu/ we> exp5sive clo!s1 & z !y are always *>g$ excessively high rates = food & lodg+4 ,pro/itution is n a result ( social conditions1 b ( "s cause deep 9 ! nature ( wom52 pro/itutes :o h be5 8reclaim$0 frequ5tly1 ev5 if provid$ =1 return to _! old way ( life4 ,x is a curi\s circum/ance t pro/itutes appe> to be relatively immune to c]ta9 diseases :i* readily affect o!r types ( wom54 ,i may note f9ally1 t pro/itution is n a mod]n gr[?2 x has be5 kn[n f ! e>lie/ times1 & ev5 0 a "p ( "s anci5t religions1 z1 = in/ance1 among ! ,phnicians4 ,pro/itution _c be consid]$ z a /ate into :i* m5 h s$uc$ wom54 ,! man may occasionally be to blame1 z1 = in/ance1 :5 a s]vant is dis*>g$ & f9ds h]self des]t$4 ,b :]e !re is no incl9ation = a c]ta9 c\rse1 ! c\rse w n be adopt$4 ,pro/itution is =eign to ! male elem5t1 al?\gh ! lives ( m5 are (t5 m labori\s & unpleasant ?an ^? ( wom51 & male pro/itutes 7su* z are f\nd among/ wait]s1 b>b]s1 & s on7 are always advanc$ sexually int]m$iate =ms4 ,! disposition = & incl9ation to pro/itution is z organic 9 a woman z is ! capacity = mo!rhood4 ,( c\rse1 ,i d n mean to sugge/ t1 :5 any woman becomes a pro/itute1 x is because ( an irresi/ible1 inborn crav+4 ,probably mo/ wom5 h bo? possibilities 9 !m1 ! "m & ! pro/itute4 ,:at is to happ5 9 cases ( d\bt dep5ds on ! man :o is able to make ! woman a "m1 n m]ely by ! physical act b by a s+le look at h]4 ,s*op5hau] said t a man's exi/5ce dates f ! mom5t :5 8 fa!r & "m fell 9 love4 ,t is n true4 ,! bir? ( a human be+1 ideally consid]$1 dates f ! mom5t :5 ! "m fir/ saw or he>d ! voice ( ! fa!r ( h] *ild4 ,biological & m$ical sci5ce1 "u ! influ5ce ( ,johannes ,mll]1 ,?4 ,bis*(f1 & ,d>w9 h be5 completely oppos$1 = ! la/ sixty ye>s1 to ! !ory ( 8impression40 ,i may lat] attempt to develop su* a !ory4 ,= ! pres5t ,i %all rem>k only t x is n fatal to ! !ory ( impression t x does n agree ) ! view :i* reg>ds ! union ( an ovum & sp]matazoon z ! only beg9n+ ( a new individual2 & sci5ce w h to deal ) x in/ead ( reg>d+ x z be+ oppos$ to all exp]i5ce & s reject+ x4 ,9 an a priori sci5ce su* z ma!matics1 ,i may take x = grant$ t ev5 on ! planet ,jupit] #b & #b c\ld n make #e1 b biology deals only ) propositions ( relative univ]sality4 ,al?\gh ,i support ! !ory ( ! exi/5ce ( su* a p[] ( impression1 x mu/ n be suppos$ t ,i ?9k t all mal=mations & abnormalities1 or ev5 any l>ge numb] ( !m1 are due to x4 ,i g no fur!r ?an to say t x is possible = ! prog5y to be influ5c$ by a man1 al?\gh physical relations betwe5 him & ! "m h n tak5 place4 ,& j z ,s*op5hau] & ,goe! 7 correct 9 _! !ory ( col\r1 al?\gh !y 7 9 opposition to all ! physici/s ( ! pa/1 pres5t1 & future1 s ,ibs5 79 8,! ,lady f ! ,sea07 & ,goe! 79 8,elective ,aff9ities07 may be "r aga9/ all ! sci5tific m5 :o deal ) ! problems ( inh]itance on a purely physical basis4 ,if a man has an influ5ce on a woman s great t h] *ildr5 ( :om he is n ! fa!r resemble him1 he mu/ be ! absolute sexual complem5t ( ! woman 9 "q4 ,if su* cases are v r>e1 x is only because !re is n mu* *ance ( ! absolute sexual complem5ts meet+1 & ?is is no argum5t aga9/ ! tru? ( ! views ( ,goe! & ,ibs5 to :i* ,i h j ref]r$4 ,x is a r>e *ance if a woman meets a man s completely h] sexual complem5t t 8 m]e pres5ce makes him ! fa!r ( h] *ildr54 ,& s x is conceivable 9 ! case ( _m mo!rs & pro/itutes t _! fates h be5 rev]s$ by accid5t4 ,on ! o!r h&1 !re mu/ be _m cases 9 :i* ! woman rema9s true to ! mat]nal type )\t meet+ ! necess>y man1 & also cases :]e a woman1 ev5 al?\gh %e meets ! man1 may be driv5 none ! less into ! pro/itute type by h] natural in/9cts4 ,we h n to face ! g5]al occurr5ce ( wom5 z "o or o!r ( two di/9ct inborn types1 ! mat]nal type & ! pro/itute4 ,! reality is f\nd betwe5 ! two4 ,!re are c]ta9ly no wom5 absolutely devoid ( ! pro/itute in/9ct to covet be+ sexually excit$ by any /rang]4 ,& !re are equally c]ta9ly no wom5 absolutely devoid ( all mat]nal in/9cts1 al?\gh ,i confess t ,i h f\nd m cases approa*+ ! absolute pro/itute ?an ! absolute "m4 ,! ess5ce ( mo!rhood consi/s1 z ! mo/ sup]ficial inve/igation w reveal1 9 t ! gett+ ( ! *ild is ! *ief object ( life1 :]eas 9 ! pro/itute sexual relations 9 !mselves are ! end4 ,! inve/igation ( ! subject mu/ be pursu$ by consid]+ ! relation ( ea* type to ! *ild & to sexual congress4 ,consid] ! relation to ! *ild fir/4 ,! absolute pro/itute ?9ks only ( ! man2 ! absolute "m ?9ks only ( ! *ild4 ,! be/ te/ case is ! relation to ! daught]4 ,x is only :5 !re is no jeal\sy ab\t h] y\? or great] beauty1 no grudg+ ab\t ! admiration %e w9s1 b an id5tification ( h]self ) h] daught] s complete t %e is z pleas$ ab\t h] *ild's admir]s z if !y 7 h] own1 t a woman has a claim to ! title ( p]fect "m4 ,! absolute "m 7if su* exi/$71 :o ?9ks only ab\t ! *ild1 w\ld become a "m by any man4 ,x w be f\nd t wom5 :o 7 devot$ to dolls :5 !y 7 *ildr51 & 7 k9d & att5tive to *ildr5 9 _! own *ildhood1 are lea/ p>ticul> ab\t _! husb&s1 & are mo/ ready to accept ! fir/ good mat* :o takes any notice ( !m & :o satisfies _! p>5ts & relatives4 ,:5 su* a maid5 has become a "m1 x matt]s n by :om1 %e ceases to pay any att5tion to any o!r m54 ,! absolute pro/itute1 on ! o!r h&1 ev5 :5 %e is /ill a *ild1 dislikes *ildr52 lat] on1 %e may pret5d to c>e = !m z a means ( attract+ m5 ?r\gh ! idea ( "m & *ild4 ,%e is ! woman ^: desire is to please all m52 & s9ce !re is no su* ?+ z an ideally p]fect type ( "m1 !re are traces ( ?is desire to please 9 e woman1 z e man ( ! _w w admit4 ,"h we c trace at lea/ a =mal resemblance betwe5 ! two types4 ,bo? are c>eless z to ! individuality ( _! sexual complem5t4 ,! "o accepts any possible man :o c make h] a "m1 & once t has be5 a*iev$ asks no?+ m2 on ?is gr\nd only is %e to be describ$ z monogam\s4 ,! o!r is ready to yield h]self to any man :o /imulates h] erotic desires2 t is h] only object4 ,f ?is description ( ! two extreme types we may hope to ga9 "s k ( ! nature ( actual wom54 ,i h to admit t ! popul> op9ion z to ! monogam\s nature ( wom5 z oppos$ to ! ess5tial polygamy ( ! male1 an op9ion ,i long held1 is errone\s4 ,! contr>y is ! case4 ,"o mu/ n be misl$ by ! fact t a woman w wait v long = a p>ticul> man1 & :]e possible w *oose him :o c be/[ mo/ value on h]1 ! mo/ noble1 ! mo/ fam\s1 ! ideal pr9ce4 ,woman is di/+ui%$ by ?is desire = value f ! animals1 :o h no reg>d = value ei!r = !mselves & ?r\gh !mselves1 z 9 ! case ( a man1 or = ano!r & ?r\gh ano!r1 z 9 ! case ( a woman4 ,b ?is c\ld be br\ght =w>d only by fools z 9 any way to ! cr$it ( woman1 s9ce1 inde$1 x %[s mo/ /rongly t %e is devoid ( a feel+ ( p]sonal value4 ,! desire = ?is dem&s to be satisfi$1 b does n f9d satisfaction 9 ! moral idea ( monogamy4 ,! man is able to p\r =? value1 to conf] x on ! woman2 he c give x1 he wi%es to give x1 b he _c receive x4 ,! woman seeks to create z mu* p]sonal value z possible = h]self1 & s adh]es to ! man :o c give h] mo/ ( x2 fai?fulness ( ! man1 h[ev]1 re/s on o!r gr\nds4 ,he reg>ds x z ! completion ( ideal love1 z a fulfilm5t1 ev5 al?\gh x is que/ionable if t c\ld be atta9$4 ,8 fai?fulness spr+s f ! purely mascul9e conception ( tru?1 ! cont9uity dem&$ by ! intelligible ego4 ,"o (t5 he>s x said t wom5 are m fai?ful ?an m52 b man's fai?fulness is a co]cion :i* he ex]cises on himself1 ( 8 own free w1 & ) full consci\sness4 ,he may n adh]e to ?is self-impos$ contract1 b 8 fall+ away f x w seem z a wrong to himself4 ,:5 he breaks 8 fai? he has suppress$ ! prompt+s ( 8 real nature4 ,= ! woman unfai?fulness is an excit+ game1 9 :i* ! ?\ght ( morality plays no "p1 b :i* is controll$ only by ! desire = safety & reputation4 ,!re is no wife :o has n be5 untrue to h] husb& 9 ?\ght1 & yet no woman reproa*es h]self ) ?is4 ,= a woman pl$ges h] fai? lightly & )\t any full consci\sness ( :at %e does1 & breaks x j z lightly & ?\ghtlessly z %e pl$g$ x4 ,! motive = hon\r+ a pl$ge c be f\nd only 9 man2 = a woman does n und]/& ! b9d+ =ce ( a giv5 ^w4 ,! examples ( female fai?fulness t c be adduc$ aga9/ ?is are ( little value4 ,!y are ei!r ! sl[ result ( ! habit ( sexual acquiesc5ce1 or a condition ( actual slav]y1 dog-l1 att5tive1 full ( in/9ctive t5aci\s atta*m5t1 comp>able ) t necessity = actual contact :i* m>ks female sympa?y4 ,! conception ( fai?fulness to "o has be5 creat$ by man4 ,x arises f ! mascul9e idea ( individuality :i* rema9s un*ang$ by "t1 &1 !re=e1 ne$s z its complem5t always "o & ! same p]son4 ,! conception ( fai?fulness to "o p]son is a l(ty "o1 & f9ds a wor?y expression 9 ! sacram5tal m>riage ( ! ,ca?olic ,*ur*4 ,i am n go+ to discuss ! "q ( m>riage or free-love4 ,m>riage 9 its exi/+ =m is z incompatible z free-love ) ! highe/ int]pretations ( ! moral law4 ,& s divorce came into ! _w ) m>riage4 ,none ! less m>riage c\ld h be5 inv5t$ only by man4 ,no propriet>y in/itution orig9at$ ) wom54 ,! introduction ( ord] into *aotic sexual relations c\ld h come only ?r\gh man's desire = x1 & 8 p[] to e/abli% x4 ,!re h be5 p]iods 9 ! hi/ory ( _m primitive races 9 :i* wom5 _h great influ5ce2 b ! p]iod ( matri>*y 0 a p]iod ( poly&ry4 ,! dissimil>ity 9 ! relations ( "m & pro/itute to _! *ild is ri* 9 important conclusions4 ,a woman 9 :om ! pro/itute elem5t is /rong w p]ceive h] son's manhood & always /& 9 a sexual relation to him4 ,b z no woman is ! p]fect type ( "m1 !re is some?+ sexual 9 ! relation ( e "m & son4 ,= ?is reason1 ,i *ose ! relation ( ! "m to h] daught] & n to h] son1 z ! be/ measure ( h] type4 ,!re are _m well-kn[n physiological p>allels betwe5 ! relations ( a "m to h] *ildr5 & ( a wife to h] husb&4 ,mo!rl9ess1 l sexuality1 is n an individual relation4 ,:5 a woman is mo!rly ! quality w be ex]cis$ n only on ! *ild ( h] own body1 b t[>ds all m51 al?\gh lat] on h] int]e/ 9 h] own *ild may become all-absorb+ & make h] n>r[1 bl9d1 & unju/ 9 ! ev5t ( a qu>rel4 ,! relation ( a mo!rly girl to h] lov] is int]e/+4 ,su* a girl is incl9$ to be mo!rly t[>ds ! man %e loves1 especially t[>ds t man :o w aft]w>ds become ! fa!r ( h] *ild2 9 fact1 9 a c]ta9 s5se ! man is h] *ild4 ,! deepe/ nature ( ! "m-type reveals itself 9 ?is id5tity ( ! "m & lov+ wife2 ! mo!rs =m ! endur+ root-/ock ( our race f :i* ! individual man arises1 & 9 ! face ( :i* he recognises 8 own imp]man5ce4 ,x is ?is idea :i* enables ! man to see 9 ! "m1 ev5 :ile %e is /ill a girl1 some?+ et]nal1 & :i* gives ! pregnant woman a trem5d\s significance4 ,! endur+ security ( ! race lies 9 ! my/]y ( ?is figure1 9 ! pres5ce ( :i* man feels 8 own fleet+ imp]man5ce4 ,9 su* m9utes !re may come to him a s5se ( fre$om & peace1 & 9 ! my/]i\s sil5ce ( ! idea1 he may ?9k t x is ?r\gh ! woman t he is 9 true relation ) ! univ]se4 ,he becomes ! *ild ( 8 belov$ "o1 a *ild ^: "m smiles on him1 und]/&s him1 & takes c>e ( him 7,siegfri$ & ,brnnhilde1 ,act ,,iii474 ,b ?is does n la/ long4 7,siegfri$ te>s himself f ,brnnhilde74 ,= a man only comes to 8 fulness :5 he frees himself f ! race1 :5 he raises himself above x4 ,= pat]nity _c satisfy ! deepe/ long+s ( a man1 & ! idea t he is to be lo/ 9 ! race is repell5t to him4 ,! mo/ t]rible *apt] 9 ! mo/ com=tless ( all ! great books t h be5 writt51 ! *apt] on 8,dea? & its ,relation to ! ,inde/ructibility ( our ,nature10 9 ,s*op5hau]'s 8,! ,_w z ,w & ,idea10 is :]e ! p]man5ce ( ! w to ma9ta9 ! species is set d[n z ! only real p]man5ce4 ,x is ! p]man5ce ( ! race t gives ! "m h] c\rage & fe>lessness 9 contra/ ) ! c[>dl9ess & fe> ( ! pro/itute4 ,x is n ! c\rage ( individuality1 ! moral c\rage aris+ f an inn] s5se ( fre$om & p]sonal value1 b r ! desire t ! race %\ld be ma9ta9$ :i*1 act+ ?r\gh ! "m1 protects ! husb& & *ild4 ,z c\rage & c[>dice belong respectively to ! "m & ! pro/itute1 s is x ) t o!r pair ( contra/+ ideas1 hope & fe>4 ,! absolute "m /&s 9 a p]si/+ relation to hope2 z %e lives on ?r\gh ! race1 %e does n quail be=e dea?1 :il/ ! pro/itute has a la/+ fe> ( x4 ,! "m feels h]self 9 a s5se sup]ior to ! man2 %e kn[s h]self to be 8 an*or2 z %e is 9 a secure place1 l9k$ 9 ! *a9 ( ! g5]ations1 %e may be lik5$ to a h>b\r f :i* ea* new individual sails =? to w&] on ! high seas4 ,f ! mom5t ( conception onw>ds ! "m is psy*ically & physically ready to fe$ & protect h] *ild4 ,& ?is protective sup]iority ext5ds itself to h] lov]2 %e und]/&s all t is simple & nave & *ildlike 9 him1 :il/ ! pro/itute und]/&s be/ 8 caprices & ref9em5ts4 ,! "m has ! crav+ to tea* h] *ild1 to give him ev]y?+1 ev5 :5 ! *ild is repres5t$ by ! lov]2 ! pro/itute /rives to impose h]self on ! man1 to receive ev]y?+ f him4 ,! "m z ! uphold] ( ! race is fri5dly to all its memb]s2 x is only :5 !re is an exclusive *oice to be made betwe5 h] *ild & o!rs t %e becomes h>d & rel5tless2 & s %e c be bo? m full ( love & m bitt] ?an ! pro/itute4 ,! "m is 9 complete relation ) ! cont9uity ( ! race2 ! pro/itute is completely outside x4 ,! "m is ! sole advocate & prie/ess ( ! race4 ,! w ( ! race to live is embodi$ 9 h]1 :il/ ! exi/5ce ( ! pro/itute %[s t ,s*op5hau] 0 pu%+ a g5]alisation too f> :5 he decl>$ t all sexuality _h relation only to ! future g5]ation4 ,t ! "m c>es only = ! life ( h] own race is pla9 f ! abs5ce ( consid]ation = animals %[n by ! be/ ( mo!rs4 ,a good "m1 ) ! greate/ peace ( m9d & cont5t1 w slaught] f[l aft] f[l = h] family4 ,! "m ( *ildr5 is a cruel /ep-"m to all o!r liv+ ?+s4 ,ano!r /rik+ aspect ( ! "m's relation to ! pres]vation ( ! race reveals itself 9 ! matt] ( food4 ,%e _c be> to see food wa/$1 h[ev] little may be left ov]2 :il/ ! pro/itute wilfully squ&]s ! quantities ( food & dr9k %e dem&s4 ,! "m is /+y & mean2 ! pro/itute op5-h&$ & lavi%4 ,! "m's object 9 life is to pres]ve ! race1 & h] delight is to see h] *ildr5 eat & to enc\rage _! appetites4 ,& s %e becomes ! good h\sekeep]4 ,c]es 0 a good "m1 a fact express$ 9 h] ,greek "n1 ,demet]4 ,! "m takes c>e ( ! body1 b does n tr\ble ab\t ! m9d4#ae ,! relation betwe5 "m & *ild rema9s mat]ial f ! kiss+ & hugg+ ( *ildhood to ! protective c>e ( maturity4 ,all h] devotion is = ! success & prosp]ity ( h] *ild 9 mat]ial ?+s4 #ae ,comp>e ! conv]sation 9 ,ibs5's 8,pe] ,gynt10 ,act ii41 betwe5 ! fa!r ( ,solveig & ,aase 7p]haps ! be/-drawn "m 9 all lit]ature7 :5 !y 7 discuss+ ! se>* = _! son3 ,aase4 8,we %all f9d him40 ,h] ,husb&4 8,& save 8 s\l40 ,aase4 8,& 8 body40 ,mat]nal love1 !n1 _c be truly repres5t$ z re/+ on moral gr\nds4 ,let any "o ask himself if he does n believe t 8 "m's love w\ld n be j z great = him if he 7 a totally diff]5t p]son4 ,! individuality ( ! *ild has no "p 9 ! mat]nal love2 ! m]e fact ( its be+ h] own *ild is suffici5t1 & s ! love _c be reg>d$ z moral4 ,9 ! love ( a man = a woman1 or betwe5 p]sons ( ! same sex1 !re is always "s ref]5ce to ! p]sonal qualities ( ! individual2 a "m's love ext5ds itself indiff]5tly to any?+ t %e has borne4 ,x de/roys ! moral conception if we realise t ! love ( a "m = h] *ild rema9s ! same :e!r ! *ild becomes a sa9t or a s9n]1 a k+ or a begg>1 an angel or a fi5d4 ,precisely ! same conclusion w be rea*$ f reflect+ h[ *ildr5 ?9k t !y h a claim on _! "m's love simply because %e is _! "m4 ,mat]nal love is non-moral because x has no relation to ! individuality ( ! be+ on :i* x is be/[$1 & !re c be an e?ical relation only betwe5 two individualities4 ,! relation ( "m & *ild is always a k9d ( physical reflex4 ,if ! little "o sudd5ly screams or cries :5 ! "m is 9 ! next room1 %e w at once ru% to x z if %e h]self _h be5 hurt2 &1 z ! *ildr5 gr[ up1 e wi% or tr\ble ( !irs is directly assum$ & %>$ by ! "m z if !y 7 h] own4 ,!re is an unbreakable l9k betwe5 ! "m & *ild1 physical1 l ! cord t unit$ ! two be=e *ildbir?4 ,?is is ! real nature ( ! mat]nal relation2 &1 = my "p1 ,i prote/ aga9/ ! fa%ion 9 :i* x is prais$1 its v indiscrim9ate "* be+ made a m]it4 ,i believe myself t _m great arti/s h recognis$ ?is1 b h *os5 to be sil5t ab\t x4 ,! extraord9>y ov]-prais+ ( ,raphael is los+ gr\nd1 & ! s+]s ( mat]nal love are no high] ?an ,fis*>t or ,ri*ep94 ,mat]nal love is an in/9ctive & natural impulse1 & animals possess x 9 a degree z high z t ( human be+s4 ,?is alone is en\gh to %[ t x is n true love1 t x is n ( moral orig92 = all morality proce$s f ! intelligible "* :i* animals1 hav+ no free w1 d n possess4 ,! e?ical imp]ative c be he>d only by a rational creature2 !re is no su* ?+ z natural morality1 = all morality mu/ be self-consci\s4 ,h] position outside ! m]e pres]vation ( ! race1 ! fact t %e is n m]ely ! *annel & ! indiff]5t protector ( ! *a9 ( be+s t passes ?r\gh h]1 place ! pro/itute 9 a s5se above ! "m1 s f> at lea/ z x is possible to speak ( high] or l[] f ! e?ical po9t ( view :5 wom5 are be+ discuss$4 ,! matron ^: :ole "t is tak5 up 9 look+ aft] h] husb& & *ildr51 :o is work+ 91 or sup]9t5d+ ! "w (1 ! h\se1 g>d51 or o!r =ms ( lab\r1 ranks intellectually v l[4 ,! mo/ highly-develop$ wom5 m5tally1 ^? :o h be5 laud$ 9 poetry1 belong to ! pro/itute category2 to ^!1 ! ,aspasia-type1 mu/ be add$ ! wom5 ( ! romantic s*ool1 =emo/ among :om mu/ be plac$ ,k>ol9e ,mi*aelis-,bhm]-,=/]-,s*legel-,s*ell+4 ,x co9cides ) :at has be5 said t only ^? m5 are sexually attract$ by ! "m-type :o h no desire = m5tal productivity4 ,! man ^: fa!rhood is conf9$ to ! *ildr5 ( 8 lo9s is he :om we %\ld expect to *oose ! mo!rly productive woman4 ,great m5 h always pref]r$ wom5 ( ! pro/itute type4#af ,_! *oice falls on ! /]ile woman1 &1 if !re is issue1 x is unfit & soon dies out4 ,ord9>y fa!rhood has z little to d ) morality z mo!rhood4 ,x is non-moral1 z ,i %all %[ 9 *ap4 xiv42 & x is illogical1 because x deals ) illusions4 ,no man ev] kn[s to :at ext5t he is ! fa!r ( 8 own *ild4 ,& its duration is %ort & fleet+2 e g5]ation & e race ( human be+s soon disappe>s4 #af ,:]ev] ,i am us+ ?is t]m ,i ref]1 ( c\rse1 n m]ely to m]c5>y wom5 ( ! /reets4 ,! wide-spread & exclusive hon\r+ ( ! mo!rly woman1 ! type mo/ upheld z ! "o & only possible "o = wom51 is accord+ly q unju/ifi$4 ,al?\gh mo/ m5 are c]ta9 t e woman c h h] consummation only 9 mo!rhood1 ,i mu/ confess t ! pro/itute--n z a p]son1 b z a ph5om5on--is mu* m e/imable 9 my op9ion4 ,!re are v>i\s causes ( ?is univ]sal rev]5ce = ! "m4 ,"o ( ! *ief reasons appe>s to be t ! "m seems to ! man ne>] 8 ideal ( *a/ity2 b ! woman :o desires *ildr5 is no m *a/e ?an ! man-covet+ pro/itute4 ,! man rew>ds ! appe>ance ( high] morality 9 ! mat]nal type by rais+ h] morally 7al?\gh ) no reason7 & socially ov] ! pro/itute type4 ,! latt] does n submit to any valuations ( ! man nor to ! ideal ( *a/ity :i* he seeks = 9 ! woman2 secretly1 z ! woman ( ! _w1 lightly z ! demi-monda9e1 or flagrantly z ! woman ( ! /reets1 %e sets h]self 9 opposition to !m4 ,?is is ! explanation ( ! social o/racisms1 ! practical outlawry :i* is ! pres5t almo/ univ]sal fate ( ! pro/itute4 ,! "m readily submits to ! moral impositions ( man1 simply because %e is int]e/$ only 9 ! *ild & ! pres]vation ( ! race4 ,x is q diff]5t ) ! pro/itute4 ,%e lives h] own life exactly z %e pleases1 ev5 al?\gh x may br+ ) x ! puni%m5t ( exclusion f society4 ,%e is n s brave z ! "m1 x is true1 be+ ?or\ghly c[>dly2 b %e has ! correlative ( c[>dice1 impud5ce1 & %e is n a%am$ ( h] %amelessness4 ,%e is naturally incl9$ to polygamy1 & always ready to attract m m5 ?an ! "o :o w\ld suffice z ! f\nd] ( a family4 ,%e gives free play to ! fulfilm5t ( h] desire1 & feels a que51 & h] mo/ ard5t wi% is = m p[]4 ,x is easy to grieve or %ock ! mo!rly woman2 no "o c injure or (f5d ! pro/itute2 = ! "m has h] hon\r to def5d z ! gu>dian ( ! species1 :il/ ! pro/itute has =sworn all social respect1 & prides h]self 9 h] fre$om4 ,! only ?\ght t di/urbs h] is ! possibility ( los+ h] p[]4 ,%e expects1 & _c ?9k o!rwise ?an t e man wi%es to possess h]1 t !y ?9k ( no?+ b h]1 & live = h]4 ,& c]ta9ly %e possesses ! greate/ p[] ov] m51 ! only influ5ce t has a /rong effect on ! life ( humanity t is n ord]$ by ! regulations ( m54 ,9 ?is lies ! analogy betwe5 ! pro/itute & m5 :o h be5 fam\s 9 politics4 ,z x is only once 9 _m c5turies t a great conqu]or arises1 l ,napoleon or ,alex&]1 s x is ) ! great c\rtesan2 b :5 %e does appe> %e m>*es triumphantly across ! _w4 ,!re is a relation%ip betwe5 su* m5 & c\rtesans 7e politician is to a c]ta9 ext5t a tribune ( ! p1 & t 9 itself implies a k9d ( pro/itution74 ,!y h ! same feel+ = p[]1 ! same dem& to be 9 relations ) all m51 ev5 ! humble/4 ,j z ! great conqu]or believes t he conf]s a fav\r on any "o to :om he talks1 s also ) ! pro/itute4 ,obs]ve h] z %e talks to a policeman1 or buys some?+ 9 a %op1 y see ! s5se ( conf]r+ a fav\r explicit 9 h]4 ,& m5 mo/ readily accept ?is view t !y are receiv+ fav\rs f ! politician or pro/itute 7"o may recall h[ a great g5ius l ,goe! reg>d$ 8 meet+ ) ,napoleon at ,erfurt2 & on ! o!r side we h ! my? ( ,p&ora1 & ! /ory ( ! bir? ( ,v5us74 ,i may n[ return to ! subject ( great m5 ( action :i* ,i op5$ 9 *ap4 v4 ,ev5 s f>-see+ a man z ,c>lyle has exalt$ ! man ( action1 z1 = in/ance1 9 8 *apt] on 8,! ,h]o z ,k+40 ,i h already %[n t ,i _c accept su* a view4 ,i may add "h t all great m5 ( action1 ev5 ! greate/ ( !m1 su* z ,cs>1 ,cromwell1 ,napoleon1 h n hesitat$ to employ falsehood2 t ,alex&] ! ,great did n hesitate to def5d "o ( 8 murd]s by sophi/ry4 ,b untru?fulness is incompatible ) g5ius4 ,! 8,memoirs ( ,napoleon10 writt5 at ,/4 ,hel5a1 are full ( mis/atem5ts & wat]y sophi/ry1 & 8 la/ words1 t 8he _h lov$ only ,france10 7 an altrui/ic pose4 ,napoleon1 ! greate/ ( ! conqu]ors1 is a suffici5t pro( t great m5 ( action are crim9als1 &1 !re=e1 n g5iuses4 ,"o c und]/& him by ?9k+ ( ! trem5d\s int5sity ) :i* he tri$ to escape f himself4 ,!re is ?is elem5t 9 all ! conqu]ors1 great or small4 ,j because he _h great gifts1 great] ?an ^? ( any emp]or be=e him1 he _h great] difficulty 9 /ifl+ ! disapprov+ voice )9 him4 ,! motive ( 8 ambition 0 ! crav+ to /ifle 8 bett] self4 ,a truly great man may hone/ly %>e 9 ! desire = admiration or fame b p]sonal ambition w n be 8 aim4 ,he w n try to knit ! :ole _w to himself by sup]ficial1 transitory bonds1 to heap up all ! ?+s ( ! _w 9 a pyramid ov] 8 "n4 ,! man ( action %>es ) ! epileptic ! desire to be 9 crim9al relation to ev]y?+ ar\nd him1 to make !m appanages ( 8 petty self4 ,! great man feels himself def9$ & sep>ate f ! _w1 a monad among/ monads1 &1 z a true microcosm1 he feels ! _w already )9 him2 he realises 9 ! fulle/ s5se ( p]sonal exp]i5ce t he has a def9ite1 assur$1 intelligible relation to ! _w :ole4 ,! great tribune & ! great c\rtesan d n feel t !y are m>k$ (f f ! _w2 !y m]ge ) x1 & dem& x all z decoration or adornm5t ( _! empirical p]sons1 & !y are incapable ( love1 affection1 or fri5d%ip4 ,! k+ ( ! fairy tale :o wi%$ to conqu] ! />s is ! p]fect image ( ! conqu]or4 ,! great g5ius hon\rs himself1 & has n to live 9 a condition ( give & take ) ! populace1 z is necess>y = ! politician4 ,! great politician makes 8 voice res\nd 9 ! _w1 b he has also to s+ 9 ! /reets2 he may make ! _w 8 *essbo>d1 b he has also to /rut 9 a boo?2 he is no m a despot ?an he is a begg> = alms4 ,he has to c\rt ! populace1 & "h he jo9s ) ! pro/itute4 ,! politician is a man ( ! /reets4 ,he mu/ be complet$ by ! public4 ,x is ! masses t he requires1 n real individualities4 ,if he is n clev] he tries to be rid ( ! great m51 or if1 l ,napoleon1 he is cunn+1 he pret5ds to hon\r !m 9 ord] t he may make !m h>mless4 ,8 dep5d5ce on ! public makes "s su* c\rse necess>y4 ,a politician _c d all t he wi%es1 ev5 if he is a ,napoleon1 & if1 unlike ,napoleon1 he actually wi%$ to realise ideals1 he w\ld soon be taught bett] by ! public1 8 real ma/]4 ,! w ( him :o covets p[] is b\nd4 ,e emp]or is consci\s ( ?is relation betwe5 himself & ! masses1 & has an almo/ in/9ctive love ( great assemblages ( 8 p1 or 8 army1 or ( 8 electors4 ,n ,m>cus ,aurelius or ,diocletian1 b ,kleo1 ,m>k ,antony1 ,!mi/ocles1 & ,mirabeau are ! embodim5ts ( ! real politician4 ,ambition means go+ among/ ! p4 ,! tribune has to foll[ ! pro/itute 9 ?is respect4 ,accord+ to ,em]son1 ,napoleon us$ to g incognito among/ ! p to excite _! hurrahs & praise4 ,s*ill] imag9$ ! same c\rse = 8 ,wall5/e94 ,hi!rto ! ph5om5a ( ! great man ( action h be5 reg>d$ ev5 by arti/s & philosoph]s z unique4 ,i ?9k t my analysis has %[n t !re is ! /ronge/ resemblance betwe5 !m & pro/itutes4 ,to see an analogy betwe5 ,antonius 7,cs>7 & ,cleopatra may appe> at fir/ f>-fet*$1 b none ! less x exi/s4 ,! great man ( action has to despise 8 inn] life1 9 ord] t he may live altoge!r 89 ! _w10 & he mu/ p]i%1 l ! ?+s ( ! _w4 ,! pro/itute ab&ons ! la/+ purpose ( h] sex1 to live 9 ! in/9cts ( ! mom5t4 ,! great pro/itute & ! great tribune are firebr&s caus+ de/ruction all ar\nd !m1 leav+ dea? & deva/ation 9 _! pa?s1 & pass l meteors unconnect$ ) ! c\rse ( human life1 indiff]5t to its objects1 & soon disappe>+1 :il/ ! g5ius & ! "m "w = ! future 9 sil5ce4 ,! pro/itute & ! tribune may be call$ ! enemies ( ,god2 !y are bo? anti-moral ph5om5a4 ,great m5 ( action1 !n1 mu/ be exclud$ f ! category ( g5ius4 ,! true g5ius1 :e!r he be an arti/ or a philosoph]1 is always /rongly m>k$ by 8 relation to ! con/ructive side ( ! _w4 ,! motive t actuates ! pro/itute requires fur!r inve/igation4 ,! purpose ( ! mo!rly woman 0 easy to und]/&2 %e is ! uphold] ( ! race4 ,b ! fundam5tal idea ( pro/itution is mu* m my/]i\s1 & no "o c h m$itat$ long on ! subject )\t (t5 d\bt+ if x 7 possible to get an explanation4 ,p]haps ! relation ( ! two types to ! sexual act may assi/ ! inquiry4 ,i hope t no "o w consid] su* a subject bel[ ! dignity ( a philosoph]4 ,! _s 9 :i* ! inquiry is made is ! *ief matt]4 ,x is at lea/ cle> t ! pa9t]s ( ,l$a & ,dane h pond]$ ov] ! problem1 & _m great writ]s--,i h 9 m9d ,zola's 8,confession ( ,claude10 8 8,hort5se10 8,r5e10 & 8,nana10 ,tol/oi's 8,resurrection10 ,ibs5's 8,h$da ,gabl]10 & 8,rita10 & above all ! 8,sonja0 ( t great s\l ,do/oyevski--mu/ h be5 ?9k+ ( ! g5]al problem r ?an m]ely wi%+ to describe p>ticul> cases4 ,! mat]nal woman reg>ds ! sexual relations z means to an end2 ! pro/itute consid]s !m z ! end itself4 ,t sexual congress may h ano!r purpose ?an m]e reproduction is pla91 z _m animals & plants are devoid ( x4 ,on ! o!r h&1 9 ! animal k+dom sexual congress is always 9 connection ) reproduction & is nev] simply lu/2 &1 moreov]1 takes place only at times suitable = bre$+4 ,desire is simply ! means employ$ by nature to secure ! cont9uity ( ! species4 ,al?\gh sexual congress is an end 9 itself = ! pro/itute1 x mu/ n be assum$ t x is mean+less 9 ! "m-type4 ,wom5 :o are sexually an/hetic no d\bt exi/ 9 bo? classes1 b !y are v r>e1 & _m app>5t cases may really be ph5om5a ( hy/]ia4 ,! f9al importance atta*$ by ! pro/itute to ! sexual act is made pla9 by ! fact t x is only t type 9 :i* coquetry occurs4 ,coquetry has inv>iably a sexual significance4 ,its purpose is to picture to ! man ! conque/ ( ! woman be=e x has occurr$1 9 ord] to induce him to make ! conque/ an actual fact4 ,! read9ess ( ! type to coquet ) e man is an expression ( h] nature2 :e!r x proce$s fur!r dep5ds on m]ely accid5tal circum/ances4 ,! mat]nal type reg>ds ! sexual act z ! beg9n+ ( a s]ies ( important ev5ts1 & s atta*es value to x equally ) ! pro/itute1 al?\gh 9 a diff]5t fa%ion4 ,! "o is cont5t$1 complet$1 satisfi$2 h] life is made ri*] & ( full] mean+ to h] by x4 ,! o!r1 = :om ! act is ev]y?+1 ! compression & end ( all life1 is nev] satisfi$1 nev] to be satisfi$1 7 %e visit$ by all ! m5 9 ! _w4 ,! body ( a woman1 z ,i h already %[n1 is sexual ?r\gh\t1 & ! special sexual acts are only int5sifications ( a di/ribut$ s5sation4 ,"h1 also1 ! diff]5ce betwe5 ! two types displays itself4 ,! pro/itute type 9 coquett+ is m]ely us+ ! g5]al sexuality ( h] body z an end 9 itself2 = h] !re is a diff]5ce only 9 degree betwe5 flirtation & sexual congress4 ,! mat]nal type is equally sexual1 b ) a diff]5t purpose2 all h] life1 ?r\gh all h] body1 %e is be+ impregnat$4 ,9 ?is fact lies ! explanation ( ! 8impression0 :i* ,i ref]r$ to z be+ indubitable1 al?\gh x is d5i$ by m5 ( sci5ce & physicians4 ,pat]nity is a diffus$ relation4 ,_m in/ances1 disput$ by m5 ( sci5ce1 po9t to an influ5ce n br\ght ab\t directly by ! reproductive cells4 ,:ite wom5 :o h borne a *ild to a black man1 are said if !y be> *ildr5 aft]w>ds to :ite m51 to h reta9$ en\gh impression f ! fir/ mate to %[ an effect on ! subsequ5t *ildr54 ,all su* facts1 gr\p$ "u ! names ( 8telegony10 8g]m9al infection10 & s on1 al?\gh disput$ by sci5ti/s1 speak = my view4 ,& s also ! mo!rly woman1 ?r\gh\t h] :ole life1 is impress$ by lov]s1 by voices1 by words1 by inanimate ?+s4 ,all ! influ5ces t come to h] %e turns to ! purpose ( h] be+1 to ! %ap+ ( h] *ild1 & ! 8actual0 fa!r has to %>e 8 pat]nity ) p]haps o!r m5 & _m o!r ?+s4 ,! woman is impregnat$ n only ?r\gh ! g5ital tract b ?r\gh e fibre ( h] be+4 ,all life makes an impression on h] & ?r[s its image on h] *ild4 ,?is univ]sality1 9 ! purely physical sph]e1 is analog\s to g5ius4 ,x is q diff]5t ) ! pro/itute4 ,:il/ ! mat]nal woman turns ! :ole _w1 ! love ( h] lov]1 & all ! impressions t %e receives to ! purposes ( ! *ild1 ! pro/itute absorbs ev]y?+ = h]self4 ,b j z %e has ?is absorb+ ne$ ( ! man1 s ! man c get some?+ f h] :i* he fails to f9d 9 ! badly dress$1 ta/eless1 pre-occupi$ mat]nal type4 ,some?+ )9 him requires pleasure1 & ?is he gets f ! daught]s ( joy4 ,unlike ! "m1 ^! ?9k ( ! pleasures ( ! _w1 ( danc+1 ( dress+1 ( !atres & conc]ts1 ( pleasure-resorts4 ,!y "k ! use ( gold1 turn+ x to luxury in/ead ( to com=t1 !y flame ?r\gh ! _w1 mak+ all its ways a triumphant m>* = _! beautiful bodies4 ,! pro/itute is ! great s$uctress ( ! _w1 ! female ,don ,juan1 ! be+ 9 ! woman t kn[s ! art ( love1 t cultivates x1 tea*es x1 & enjoys x4 ,v deep-seat$ diff]5ces are l9k$ ) :at ,i h be5 describ+4 ,! "m-woman craves = respectability 9 ! man1 n because %e grasps its value z an idea1 b because x is ! support] ( ! life ( ! _w4 ,%e h]self works1 & is n idle l ! pro/itute2 %e is fill$ ) c>e = ! future1 & s requires f ! man a correspond+ practical responsibility1 & w n s$uce him to pleasure4 ,! pro/itute1 on ! o!r h&1 is mo/ attract$ by a c>eless1 idle1 dissipat$ man4 ,a man t has lo/ self-re/ra9t repels ! "m-woman1 is attractive to ! pro/itute4 ,!re are wom5 :o are dissatisfi$ ) a son t is idle at s*ool2 !re are o!rs :o enc\rage him4 ,! dilig5t boy pleases ! "m-woman1 ! idle & c>eless boy w9s approval f ! pro/itute type4 ,?is di/9ction rea*es high up among/ ! respectable classes ( society1 b a sali5t example ( x is se5 9 ! fact t ! 8bullies0 lov$ by wom5 ( ! /reets are usually crim9als4 ,! s\t5eur is always a crim9al1 a ?ief1 a fraudul5t p]son1 or sometimes ev5 a murd]]4 ,i am almo/ on ! po9t ( say+ t1 h[ev] little woman is to be reg>d$ z immoral 7%e is only non-moral71 pro/itution /&s 9 "s deep relation ) crime1 :il/ mo!rhood is equally b\nd ) ! opposite t5d5cy4 ,we mu/ avoid reg>d+ ! pro/itute z ! female analogue ( ! crim9al2 wom51 z ,i h already po9t$ out1 are n crim9als2 !y are too l[ 9 ! moral scale = t designation4 ,none ! less1 !re is a con/ant connection betwe5 ! pro/itute type & crime4 ,! great c\rtesan is comp>able ) t great crim9al1 ! conqu]or1 & readily ent]s into actual relations ) him2 ! petty c\rtesan ent]ta9s ! ?ief & ! pickpocket4 ,! "m type is 9 fact ! gu>dian ( ! life ( ! _w1 ! pro/itute type is its enemy4 ,b j z ! "m is 9 h>mony1 n ) ! s\l b ) ! body1 s ! pro/itute is no diabolic de/roy] ( ! idea1 b only a corrupt] ( empirical ph5om5a4 ,physical life & physical dea?1 bo? ( :i* are 9 intimate connection ) ! sexual act1 are display$ by ! woman 9 h] two capacities ( "m & pro/itute4 ,x is /ill impossible to give a cle>] solution ?an t :i* ,i h attempt$1 ( ! real significance ( mo!rhood & pro/itution4 ,i am on an unfamili> pa?1 almo/ untrodd5 by any e>li] wayf>]4 ,religi\s my?s & philosophy alike h be5 unable to prop\nd solutions4 ,i h f\nd "s clues h[ev]4 ,! anti-moral significance ( pro/itution is 9 h>mony ) ! fact t x appe>s only among/ mank9d4 ,9 all ! animal k+dom ! females are us$ only = reproduction2 !re are no true females t are /]ile4 ,!re are analogies to pro/itution1 h[ev]1 among/ male animals2 "o has only to ?9k ( ! display & decoration ( ! peacock1 ( ! %9+ gl[-worm1 ( s++ birds1 ( ! love dances ( _m male birds4 ,^! second>y sexual manife/ations1 h[ev]1 are m]e adv]tisem5ts ( sexuality4 ,pro/itution is a human ph5om5on2 animals & plants are non-moral2 !y are nev] dispos$ to immorality & possess only mo!rhood4 ,"h is a deep secret1 hidd5 9 ! nature & orig9 ( mank9d4 ,i ought to correct my e>li] exposition by insi/+ t ,i h come to reg>d ! pro/itute elem5t z a possibility 9 all wom5 j z mu* z ! m]ely animal capacity = mo!rhood4 ,x is some?+ :i* p5etrates ! nature ( ! human female1 some?+ ) :i* ! mo/ animal-l "m is t+$1 some?+ :i* corresponds 9 ! human female1 to ! *>act]s t sep>ate ! human male f ! animal male4 ,j z ! immoral possibility ( man is some?+ t di/+ui%es him f ! male animal1 s ! quality ( ! pro/itute di/+ui%es ! human female f ! animal female4 ,i %all h some?+ to say z to ! g5]al relation ( man to ?is elem5t 9 woman1 t[>ds ! end ( my inve/igation1 b possibly ! ultimate orig9 ( pro/itution is a deep my/]y into :i* none c p5etrate4 ,,*apt] ,,xi ,,erotics ,,& ,,/hetics ,! argum5ts :i* are 9 common use to ju/ify a high op9ion ( woman h n[ be5 exam9$ 9 all except a few po9ts to :i* ,i %all recur1 f ! po9t ( view ( critical philosophy1 & h be5 controv]t$4 ,i hope t ,i h ju/ifi$ my delib]ate *oice ( gr\nd1 al?\gh1 inde$1 ,s*op5hau]'s fate %\ld h be5 a w>n+ to me4 ,8 depreciation ( wom5 9 8 philosophical "w 8,on ,wom510 has be5 frequ5tly attribut$ to ! circum/ance t a beautiful ,v5etian girl1 9 ^: company he 01 fell 9 love ) ! extremely h&some p]sonal appe>ance ( ,byron2 z if a l[ op9ion ( wom5 7 n m likely to come to him :o _h _h ! be/ n ! wor/ =tune ) !m4 ,! practice ( m]ely call+ any "o :o assails woman a misogyni/1 in/ead ( refut+ argum5t by argum5t1 has mu* to comm5d x4 ,hatr$ is nev] imp>tial1 &1 !re=e1 to describe a man z hav+ an animus aga9/ ! object ( 8 criticism1 is at once to lay him op5 to ! *>ge ( ins9c]ity1 immorality1 & p>tiality1 & "o t c be made ) a hyp]bole ( accusation & evasion ( ! po9t1 :i* only equal its lack ( ju/ification4 ,?is sort ( answ] nev] fails 9 its object1 :i* is to exempt ! v9dicator f refut+ ! actual /atem5ts4 ,x is ! olde/ & h&ie/ weapon ( ! l>ge majority ( m51 :o nev] wi% to see woman z %e is4 ,no m5 :o really ?9k deeply ab\t wom5 reta9 a high op9ion ( !m2 m5 ei!r despise wom5 or !y h nev] ?\ght s]i\sly ab\t !m4 ,!re is no d\bt t x is a fallaci\s me?od 9 a !oretical argum5t to ref] to "o's oppon5t's psy*ological motives in/ead ( br++ =w>d pro(s to controv]t 8 /atem5ts4 ,x is n necess>y = me to say t 9 logical controv]sy ! adv]s>ies %\ld place !mselves "u an imp]sonal conception ( tru?1 & _! aim %\ld be to rea* a result1 irrespective ( _! own concrete op9ions4 ,if1 h[ev]1 9 an argum5t1 "o side has come to a c]ta9 conclusion by a logical *a9 ( reason+1 & ! o!r side m]ely opposes ! conclusion )\t hav+ foll[$ ! reason+ process1 x is at once fair & appropriate to exam9e ! psy*ological motives :i* h induc$ ! adv]s>ies to ab&on argum5t = abuse4 ,i %all n[ put ! *ampions ( wom5 to ! te/ & see h[ mu* ( _! attitude is due to s5tim5tality1 h[ mu* ( x is dis9t]e/$1 & h[ mu* due to selfi% motives4 ,all objections rais$ aga9/ ^? :o despise wom5 arise f ! erotic relations 9 :i* man /&s to woman4 ,?is relation%ip is absolutely diff]5t f ! purely sexual attraction :i* occurs 9 ! animal _w1 & plays a mo/ important "p 9 human affairs4 ,x is q errone\s to say t sexuality & eroticism1 sexual impulse & love1 are fundam5tally "o & ! same ?+1 ! second an embelli%+1 ref9+1 spiritualis+ sublimation ( ! fir/2 al?\gh practically all m$ical m5 hold ?is view1 & ev5 su* m5 z ,kant & ,s*op5hau] ?\ght s4 ,be=e ,i g into ! reasons = ma9ta9+ ! exi/5ce ( ?is great di/9ction1 ,i %\ld l to say some?+ ab\t ! views ( ^! two m54 ,kant's op9ion is n ( mu* weight1 because love z sexual impulse mu/ h be5 z little kn[n to him z possible1 probably less ?an 9 ! case ( any o!r man4 ,he 0 s little erotic t he nev] felt ! k9dr$ desire to travel4#ag ,he repres5ts too l(ty & pure a type to speak ) au?ority on ?is matt]3 8 "o passion 0 metaphysics4 #ag ,! association ( ^! two desires may surprise read]s4 ,x re/s on a metaphysical gr\nd1 mu* ( :i* w be m app>5t :5 ,i h develop$ my !ory ( eroticism fur!r4 ,"t1 l space1 is conceiv$ ( z unlimit$1 & man1 9 8 desire = fre$om1 9 8 ef=ts /imulat$ by 8 p[] ( free w to transc5d 8 limits1 has ! crav+ = unlimit$ "t & unlimit$ space4 ,! desire = travel is simply an expression ( ?is re/lessness1 ?is fundam5tal *af+ ( ! _s aga9/ its bonds4 ,b j z et]nity is n prolong$ "t1 b ! negation ( "t1 s h[ev] f> a man w&]s1 he c ext5d 8 area b _c aboli% space4 ,& s 8 ef=ts to transc5d space mu/ always be h]oic failures3 ,i %all %[ t 8 eroticism is a simil> notable failure4 ,z = ,s*op5hau]1 he _h j z little idea ( ! high] =m ( eroticism2 8 sexuality 0 ( ! gross ord]4 ,?is c be se5 f ! foll[+3 ,s*op5hau]'s c\nt5ance %[s v little k9dl9ess & a good deal ( fi]c5ess 7a circum/ance :i* mu/ h caus$ him great sorr[4 ,!re is no exhibition ( e?ical sympa?y if "o is v sorry = oneself4 ,! mo/ sympa!tic p]sons are ^? :o1 l ,kant & ,nietzs*e1 h no p>ticle ( self-pity74 ,b x may be said ) safety t only ^? :o are mo/ sympa!tic are capable ( a /rong passion3 ^? 8:o take no int]e/ 9 ?+s0 are incapable ( love4 ,?is does n imply t !y h diabolical natures4 ,!y may1 on ! contr>y1 /& v high morally )\t kn[+ :at _! neighb\rs are ?9k+ or do+1 & )\t hav+ a s5se = o!r ?an sexual relations ) wom51 z 0 ! case ) ,s*op5hau]4 ,he 0 a man :o knew only too well :at ! sexual impulse 01 b he nev] 0 9 love2 if t 7 n s1 ! bias 9 8 fam\s "w1 8,! ,metaphysics ( ,sexual ,love10 w\ld be inexplicable2 9 x ! mo/ important doctr9e is t ! unconsci\s goal ( all love is no?+ m ?an 8! =mation ( ! next g5]ation40 ,?is view1 z ,i hope to prove1 is false4 ,x is true t a love entirely )\t sexuality has nev] be5 kn[n4 ,h[ev] high a man may /& he is /ill a be+ ) s5ses4 ,:at absolutely disposes ( ! opposite view is ?is3 all love1 z su*--)\t go+ into /hetic pr9ciples ( love--is antagoni/ic to ^? elem5ts 7( ! relation%ip7 :i* press t[>ds sexual union2 9 fact1 su* elem5ts t5d to negate love4 ,love & desire are two unlike1 mutually exclusive1 oppos+ conditions1 & dur+ ! "t a man really loves1 ! ?\ght ( physical union ) ! object ( 8 love is insupportable4 ,because !re is no hope :i* is entirely free f fe> does n alt] ! fact t hope & fe> are utt]ly opposite pr9ciples4 ,x is j ! same 9 ! case ( sexual impulse & love4 ,! m erotic a man is ! less he w be tr\bl$ ) 8 sexuality1 & vice v]s4 ,if x be ! case t !re is no adoration utt]ly free f desire1 !re is no reason :y ! two %\ld be id5tifi$1 s9ce x might be possible = a sup]ior be+ to atta9 ! highe/ phases ( bo?4 ,t p]son lies1 or has nev] kn[n :at love is1 :o says he loves a woman :om he desires2 s mu* diff]5ce is !re betwe5 sexual impulse & love4 ,?is is :at makes talk ( love aft] m>riage seem1 9 mo/ cases1 make-believe4 ,! foll[+ w %[ h[ obtuse ! view ( ^? is :o p]si/1 ) unconsci\s cynicism1 9 ma9ta9+ ! id5tity ( love & sexual impulse4 ,sexual attraction increases ) physical proximity2 love is /ronge/ 9 ! abs5ce ( ! lov$ "o2 x ne$s sep>ation1 a c]ta9 di/ance1 to pres]ve x4 ,9 fact1 :at all ! travels 9 ! _w c\ld n a*ieve1 :at "t c\ld n accompli%1 may be br\ght ab\t by accid5tal1 un9t5tional1 physical contact ) ! belov$ object1 9 :i* ! sexual impulse is awak5$1 & :i* suffices to kill love on ! spot4 ,!n1 aga91 9 ! case ( m highly diff]5tiat$1 great m51 ! type ( girl desir$1 & ! type ( girl lov$ b nev] desir$1 are always totally diff]5t 9 face1 =m1 & disposition2 !y are two diff]5t be+s4 ,!n !re is ! 8platonic love10 :i* pr(essors ( psy*iatry h su* a poor op9ion (4 ,i %\ld say r1 !re is only 8platonic0 love1 because any o!r s-call$ love belongs to ! k+dom ( ! s5ses3 x is ! love ( ,beatrice1 ! wor%ip ( ,madonna2 ! ,babylonian woman is ! symbol ( sexual desire4 ,kant's enum]ation ( ! transc5d5tal ideas ( love w\ld h to be ext5d$ if x is to be held4 ,= ! purely spiritual love1 ! love ( ,plato & ,bruno1 :i* is absolutely free f desire1 is none ! less a transc5d5tal concept2 nor is its significance z a concept impair$1 because su* a love has nev] be5 fully realis$4 ,x is ! problem put =w>d 9 8,tannhus]40 ,we h ,tannhus]1 ,wolfram1 ,v5us1 & ,m>ia4 ,! fact t two lov]s1 :o h f\nd ea* o!r once = all--,tri/an & ,isolde--*oose dea? in/ead ( ! bridal b$1 is j z absolute a pro( ( a high]1 maybe metaphysical1 some?+ 9 mank9d1 z ! m>tyrdom ( a ,giordano ,bruno4 8,dir1 hohe ,liebe1 tne ,begei/]t me9 ,gesang1 ,die mir 9 ,engels*ne ,tief 9 die ,seele drang6 ,du nah/ als ,gott ges&te3 ,i* folg' aus hold] ,f]n'1-- ,s fhr/ du 9 die ,l&e1 ,wo ewig /rahlt de9 ,/]n40 ,:o is ! object ( su* love8 ,is x woman1 z %e has be5 repres5t$ 9 ?is "w1 :o lacks all high] qualities1 :o gets h] value f ano!r1 :o has no p[] to atta9 value on h] own acc\nt8 ,impossible4 ,x is ! ideally beautiful1 ! immaculate woman1 :o is lov$ 9 su* high fa%ion4 ,! s\rce ( ?is beauty & *a/ity 9 wom5 mu/ n[ be f\nd4 ,! "q z to :e!r ! female sex is ! m beautiful1 & z to :e!r x des]ves ! title ( 8!0 beautiful1 has be5 mu* disput$4 ,x may be well to consid] by :om & h[ f> woman is consid]$ beautiful4 ,x is well kn[n t woman is n mo/ beautiful 9 ! nude4 ,i admit t 9 pictures or /atues ! nude female may look well4 ,b ! sexual impulse makes x impossible to look at a liv+ woman 9 a nude condition ) ! purely critical1 unemotional eye1 :i* is an ess5tial feature 9 judg+ any object ( beauty4 ,b ap>t f ?is1 an absolute nude female figure 9 ! life leaves an impression ( some?+ want+1 an incomplet5ess1 :i* is incompatible ) beauty4 ,a nude woman may be beautiful 9 details1 b ! g5]al effect is n beautiful2 %e inevitably creates ! feel+ t %e is look+ = some?+1 & ?is induces dis9cl9ation r ?an desire 9 ! spectator4 ,! sight ( an upright female =m1 9 ! nude1 makes mo/ pat5t h] purposelessness1 ! s5se ( h] purpose 9 life be+ d]iv$ f some?+ outside h]self2 9 ! recumb5t position ?is feel+ is greatly dim9i%$4 ,x is evid5t t arti/s h p]ceiv$ ?is 9 reproduc+ ! nude4 ,b ev5 9 ! details ( h] body a woman is n :olly beautiful1 n ev5 if %e is a flawless1 p]fect type ( h] sex4 ,! g5italia are ! *ief difficulty 9 ! way ( reg>d+ h] z !oretically beautiful4 ,if ! idea 7 ju/ifi$ t man's love = woman is ! direct result ( 8 sexual impulse2 if we c\ld agree ) ,s*op5hau] t 8! "u-siz$1 n>r[-%\ld]$1 broad-hipp$1 & %ort-limb$ sex is call$ beautiful only because ! male intellect is befogg$ by ! sexual impulse1 t impulse be+ ! creator ( ! conception ( ! beauty ( woman10 x w\ld foll[ t ! g5italia c\ld n be exclud$ f ! conception ( beauty4 ,x requires no l5g?y exposition to prove t ! g5italia are n reg>d$ z beautiful1 & t1 !re=e1 ! beauty ( woman _c be reg>d$ z due to ! sexual impulse4 ,9 fact1 ! sexual impulse is 9 reality oppos$ to ! conception ( beauty4 ,! man :o is mo/ "u its influ5ce has lea/ s5se ( female beauty1 & desires any woman m]ely because %e is a woman4 ,a woman's nude body is di/a/eful to man because x (f5ds 8 s5se ( %ame4 ,! easy sup]ficiality ( our day has giv5 col\r to ! /atem5t t ! s5se ( %ame has aris5 f ! we>+ ( clo!s1 & x has be5 urg$ t ! objection to ! nude arises f ^? :o are unnatural & secretly immorally-m9d$4 ,b a man :o has become immorally-m9d$ no long] is int]e/$ 9 ! nude z su*1 because x has lo/ its influ5ce on him4 ,he m]ely desires & no long] loves4 ,all true love is mode/1 l all true pity4 ,!re is only "o case ( %amelessness--a decl>ation ( love ! s9c]ity ( :i* a man is conv9c$ ( 9 ! mom5t he makes x4 ,?is w\ld repres5t ! conceivable maximum ( %amelessness2 b !re is no decl>ation ( love :i* is q true1 & ! /upidity ( wom5 is %[n by _! read9ess to believe su* prote/ations4 ,! love be/[$ by ! man is ! /&>d ( :at is beautiful & :at is hateful 9 woman4 ,! conditions are q diff]5t 9 /hetics f ^? 9 logic or e?ics4 ,9 logic !re is an ab/ract tru? :i* is ! /&>d ( ?\ght2 9 e?ics !re is an ideal good :i* furni%es ! crit]ion ( :at ought to be done1 & ! value ( ! good is e/abli%$ by ! det]m9ation to l9k ! w ) ! good4 ,9 /hetics beauty is creat$ by love2 !re is no det]m9+ law to love :at is beautiful1 & ! beautiful does n pres5t itself to human be+s ) any imp]ative comm& to love x4 7,& s !re is no ab/ract1 no sup]-individual 8"r0 ta/e74 ,all beauty is really m a projection1 an emanation ( ! requirem5ts ( love2 & s ! beauty ( woman is n ap>t f love1 x is n an objective to :i* love is direct$1 b woman's beauty is ! love ( man2 !y are n two ?+s1 b "o & ! same ?+4 ,j z hatefulness comes f hat+1 s love creates beauty4 ,?is is only ano!r way ( express+ ! fact t beauty has z little to d ) ! sexual impulse z ! sexual impulse has to d ) love4 ,beauty is some?+ t c nei!r be felt1 t\*$1 nor mix$ ) o!r ?+s2 x is only at a di/ance t x c be pla9ly disc]n$1 & :5 x is approa*$ x )draws itself4 ,! sexual impulse :i* seeks = sexual union ) woman is a d5ial ( su* beauty2 ! woman :o has be5 possess$ & enjoy$1 w nev] aga9 be wor%ipp$ = h] beauty4 ,i n[ come to ! second "q3 :at are ! innoc5ce & morality ( a woman8 ,x w be conv5i5t to />t ) a few facts t conc]n ! orig9 ( all love4 ,bodily cleanl9ess1 z has (t5 be5 rem>k$1 is 9 m5 a g5]al indication ( morality & rectitude2 or at lea/ x may be said t uncleanly m5 are seldom ( high "*4 ,x may be notic$ t :5 m51 :o =m]ly paid little att5tion to bodily cleanl9ess1 beg9 to /rive = a high] p]fection ( "*1 !y at ! same "t take m tr\ble ) ! c>e ( ! body4 ,9 ! same way1 :5 m5 sudd5ly become imbu$ ) passion !y exp]i5ce a simultane\s desire = bodily cleanl9ess1 & x may almo/ be said ( !m t only at su* a "t d !y wa% !mselves ?or\ghly4 ,if we n[ turn to gift$ m51 we %all see t 9 _! case love frequ5tly beg9s ) self-mortification1 humiliation1 & re/ra9t4 ,a moral *ange sets 91 a process ( purification seems to emanate f ! object lov$1 ev5 if h] lov] has nev] spok5 to h]1 or only se5 h] a few times 9 ! di/ance4 ,x is1 !n1 impossible t ?is process %\ld h its orig9 9 t p]son3 v (t5 x may be a bread-&-butt] miss1 a /olid lump1 m (t5 a s5su\s coquette1 9 :om no "o c see ! m>vell\s *>act]i/ics ) :i* 8 love end[s h]1 save h] lov]4 ,c any "o believe t x is a concrete p]son :o is lov$8 ,does %e n 9 reality s]ve z ! />t+ po9t = incomp>ably great] emotions ?an %e c\ld inspire8 ,9 love1 man is only lov+ himself4 ,n 8 empirical self1 n ! weaknesses & vulg>ities1 n ! fail+s & smallnesses :i* he outw>dly exhibits2 b all t he wants to be1 all t he ought to be1 8 true/1 deepe/1 intelligible nature1 free f all fett]s ( necessity1 f all ta9t ( e>?4 ,9 8 actual physical exi/5ce1 ?is be+ is limit$ by space & "t & by ! %ackles ( ! s5ses2 h[ev] deep he may look into himself1 he f9ds himself damag$ & spott$1 & sees n[h]e ! image ( speckless purity = :i* he seeks4 ,& yet !re is no?+ he covets s mu* z to realise 8 own ideal1 to f9d 8 real high] self4 ,& z he _c f9d ?is true self )9 himself1 he has to seek x )\t himself4 ,he projects 8 ideal ( an absolutely wor?y exi/5ce1 ! ideal t he is unable to isolate )9 himself1 ^u ano!r human be+1 & ?is act1 & ?is alone1 is none o!r ?an love & ! significance ( love4 ,only a p]son :o has done wrong & is consci\s ( x c love1 & s a *ild c nev] love4 ,x is only because love repres5ts ! highe/1 mo/ unatta9able goal ( all long+1 because x _c be realis$ 9 exp]i5ce b mu/ rema9 an idea2 only because x is localis$ on "s o!r human be+1 & yet rema9s at a di/ance1 s t ! ideal nev] atta9s its realisation2 only because ( su* conditions c love be associat$ ) ! awak5+ ( ! desire = purification1 ) ! rea*+ aft] a goal t is purely spiritual1 & s _c be blemi%$ by physical union ) ! belov$ p]son2 only ?us1 is love ! highe/ & /ronge/ ef=t ( ! w t[>ds ! supreme good2 only ?us does x br+ ! true be+ ( man to a /ate betwe5 body & _s1 betwe5 ! s5ses & ! moral nature1 betwe5 ,god & ! bea/s4 ,a human be+ only f9ds himself :51 9 ?is fa%ion1 he loves4 ,& ?us x comes ab\t t only :5 !y love d _m m5 realise ! exi/5ce ( _! own p]sonality & ( ! p]sonality ( ano!r1 t 8,i0 & 8?\0 become = !m m ?an grammatical expressions4 ,& s also comes ab\t ! great "p play$ 9 _! love /ory by ! names ( ! two lov]s4 ,!re is no d\bt b t x is ?r\gh love t _m m5 fir/ come to "k ( _! own real nature1 & to be conv9c$ t !y possess a s\l4 ,x is ?is :i* makes a lov] desire to keep 8 belov$ at a di/ance--on no acc\nt to injure h] purity by contact ) him--9 ord] to assure himself ( h] & ( 8 own exi/5ce4 ,_m an inflexible empirici/1 com+ "u ! influ5ce ( love1 becomes an en?usia/ic my/ic2 ! mo/ /rik+ example be+ ,augu/e ,comte1 ! f\nd] ( positivism1 ^: :ole !ories 7 revolutionis$ by 8 feel+s = ,clotilde de ,vaux4 ,x is n only = ! arti/1 b = ! :ole ( mank9d t ,amo1 ergo sum holds good psy*ologically4 ,love is a ph5om5on ( projection j z hate is1 n a ph5om5on ( equation z fri5d%ip is4 ,! latt] presupposes an equality ( bo? individuals3 love always implies inequality1 disproportion4 ,to end[ an individual ) all t "o might be & yet nev] c be1 to make h] ideal--t is love4 ,beauty is ! symbol ( ?is act ( wor%ip4 ,x is ?is t s (t5 surprises & ang]s a lov] :5 he is conv9c$ t beauty does n imply morality 9 a woman4 ,he feels t ! nature ( ! (f5ce is increas$ by 8su* depravity0 be+ possible 9 conjunction ) su* 8beauty40 ,he is n aw>e t ! woman 9 "q seems beautiful to him because he /ill loves h]2 o!rwise ! incongruity betwe5 ! ext]nal & int]nal w\ld no long] pa9 him4 ,! reason an ord9>y pro/itute c nev] seem beautiful is because x is naturally impossible to end[ h] ) ! projection ( value2 %e c satisfy only ! ta/e ( vulg> m9ds4 ,%e is ! mate ( ! wor/ sort ( m54 ,9 ?is we h ! explanation ( a relation utt]ly oppos$ to morality3 woman 9 g5]al is simply indiff]5t to e?ics1 %e is non-moral1 &1 !re=e1 unlike ! anti-moral crim9al1 :o is in/9ctively dislik$1 or ! devil :o is hide\s 9 e "o's imag9ation1 s]ves z a receptacle = project$ wor?9ess2 z %e nei!r does good nor evil1 %e nei!r resi/s nor res5ts ?is imposition ( ! ideal on h] p]sonality4 ,x is pat5t t woman's morality is acquir$2 b ?is morality is man's1 :i* he 9 an access ( supreme love & devotion has convey$ to h]4 ,s9ce all beauty is always only ! con/antly r5ew$ endeav\r to embody ! highe/ =m ( value1 !re is a pre-em95tly satisfy+ elem5t 9 x1 9 ! face ( :i* all desire1 all self-seek+ fade away4 ,all =ms ( beauty :i* appeal to man1 by reason ( ! /hetic function1 are 9 reality also attempts on 8 "p to realise ! ideal4 ,beauty is ! symbol ( p]fection 9 be+4 ,!re=e beauty is inviolable2 x is /atic & n dynamic2 s t any alt]ation ) reg>d to x upsets & annuls ! idea ( x4 ,! desire ( p]sonal wor?9ess1 ! love ( p]fection1 mat]ialise 9 ! idea ( beauty4 ,& s ! beauty ( nature is born1 a beauty t ! crim9al c nev] "k1 z e?ics fir/ create nature4 ,?us x is t nature always & ev]y:]e1 9 its greate/ & smalle/ =ms1 gives ! impression ( p]fection4 ,! natural law is only ! mortal symbol ( ! moral law1 z natural beauty is ! manife/ation ( nobility ( ! s\l2 logic ?us becomes ! embodim5t ( e?ics6 ,j z love creates a new woman = man in/ead ( ! real woman1 s art1 ! eroticism ( ! ,all1 creates out ( *aos ! pl5itude ( =ms 9 ! univ]se2 & j z !re is no natural beauty )\t =m1 )\t a law ( nature1 s also !re is no art )\t =m1 no arti/ic beauty :i* does n con=m to ! laws ( art4 ,natural beauty is no less a realisation ( arti/ic beauty ?an ! natural law is ! fulfilm5t ( ! moral law1 ! natural reflection ( t h>mony ^: image is en?ron$ 9 ! s\l ( man4 ,! nature :i* ! arti/ reg>ds z 8 tea*]1 is ! law :i* he creates out ( 8 own be+4 ,i return to my own !me f ^! analyses ( art1 :i* are no m ?an elaborations ( ! ?\ghts ( ,kant & ,s*ell+ 7& ( ,s*ill] writ+ "u _! influ5ce74 ,! ma9 proposition = :i* ,i h argu$ is t man's belief 9 ! morality ( woman1 8 projection ( 8 own s\l ^u h]1 & 8 conception ( ! woman z beautiful1 are "o & ! same ?+1 ! second be+ ! s5su\s side ( ! fir/4 ,x is ?us intelligible1 al?\gh an inv]sion ( ! tru?1 :51 9 morality1 a beautiful s\l is spok5 (1 or :51 foll[+ ,%aftesbury & ,h]b>t1 e?ics are subord9at$ to /hetics2 foll[+ ,socrates & ,plato we may id5tify ! good & ! beautiful1 b we mu/ n =get t beauty is only a bodily image 9 :i* morality tries to repres5t itself1 t all /hetics are creat$ by e?ics4 ,e individual & temporal pres5tation ( ?is attempt$ inc>nation mu/ necess>ily be illusory1 & c h no m ?an a fictiti\s reality4 ,& s all individual cases ( beauty are imp]man5t2 ! love t is direct$ to a woman mu/ p]i% ) ! age ( ! woman4 ,! idea ( beauty is ! idea ( nature & is p]man5t1 :il/ e beautiful ?+1 e "p ( nature1 is p]i%able4 ,! et]nal c realise itself 9 ! limit$ & ! concrete only by an illusion2 x is self-deception to seek ! fulness ( love 9 a woman4 ,z all love t atta*es itself to a p]son mu/ be imp]man5t1 ! love ( woman is doom$ to unhapp9ess4 ,all su* love has ?is s\rce ( failure inh]5t 9 x4 ,x is an h]oic attempt to seek = p]man5t wor? :]e !re is no wor?4 ,! love t is atta*$ to endur+ wor? is atta*$ to ! absolute1 to ! idea ( ,god1 :e!r t idea be a pan!i/ic conception ( endur+ nature1 or rema9 transc5d5tal2 ! love t atta*es itself to an individual ?+1 z to a woman1 mu/ fail4 ,i h already p>tly expla9$ :y man takes ?is burd5 on himself4 ,j z hatr$ is a projection ( our own evil qualities on o!r p]sons 9 ord] t we may /& ap>t f !m & hate !m2 j z ! devil 0 inv5t$ to s]ve z a vehicle ( all ! evil impulses 9 man2 s love has ! purpose ( help+ man 9 8 battle = good1 :5 he feels t he himself is n /rong en\gh4 ,love & hate are alike =ms ( c[>dice4 ,9 hate we picture to ourselves t our own hateful qualities exi/ 9 ano!r1 & by s do+ we feel ourselves p>tly fre$ f !m4 ,9 love we project :at is good 9 u1 & s hav+ creat$ a good & an evil image we are m able to comp>e & value !m4 ,lov]s seek _! own s\ls 9 ! lov$ ones1 & s love is free f ! limits ,i describ$ 9 ! fir/ "p ( ?is book1 n be+ b\nd d[n by ! conditions ( m]ely sexual attraction4 ,9 spite ( _! real opposition1 !re is an analogy betwe5 erotics & sexuality4 ,sexuality uses ! woman z ! means to produce pleasure & *ildr5 ( ! body2 erotics use h] z ! means to create wor? & *ildr5 ( ! s\l4 ,a little und]/ood conception ( ,plato is full ( ! deepe/ mean+3 t love is n direct$ t[>ds beauty1 b t[>ds ! procreation ( beauty2 t x seeks to w9 immortality = ! ?+s ( ! m9d1 j z ! l[] sexual impulse is direct$ t[>ds ! p]petuation ( ! species4 ,x is m ?an a m]ely =mal analogy1 a sup]ficial1 v]bal resemblance1 to speak ( ! fruitfulness ( ! m9d1 ( its conception & reproduction1 or1 9 ! words ( ,plato1 to speak ( ! *ildr5 ( ! s\l4 ,z bodily sexuality is ! ef=t ( an organic be+ to p]petuate its own =m1 s love is ! attempt to make p]man5t "o's own s\l or individuality4 ,sexuality & love are alike ! ef=t to realise oneself1 ! "o by a bodily image1 ! o!r by an image ( ! s\l4 ,b x is only ! man ( g5ius :o c approa* ?is entirely uns5su\s love1 & x is only he :o seeks to produce et]nal *ildr5 9 :om 8 deepe/ nature %all live = ev]4 ,! p>allel may be c>ri$ fur!r4 ,s9ce ,novalis fir/ call$ att5tion to x1 _m h insi/$ on ! association betwe5 sexual desire & cruelty4 ,all t is born ( woman mu/ die4 ,reproduction1 bir?1 & dea? are indissolubly associat$2 ! ?\ght ( untimely dea? awak5s sexual desire 9 its fi]ce/ =m1 z ! det]m9ation to reproduce oneself4 ,& s sexual union1 consid]$ e?ically1 psy*ologically1 & biologically1 is alli$ to murd]2 x is ! negation ( ! woman & ! man2 9 its extreme case x robs !m ( _! consci\sness to give life to ! *ild4 ,! highe/ =m ( eroticism1 z mu* z ! l[e/ =m ( sexuality1 uses ! woman n = h]self b z means to an end--to pres]ve ! individuality ( ! arti/4 ,! arti/ has us$ ! woman m]ely z ! scre5 on :i* to project 8 own idea4 ,! real psy*ology ( ! lov$ woman is always a matt] ( indiff]5ce4 ,9 ! mom5t :5 a man loves a woman1 he nei!r und]/&s h] nor wi%es to und]/& h]1 al?\gh und]/&+ is ! only moral basis ( association 9 mank9d4 ,a human be+ _c love ano!r t he fully und]/&s1 because he w\ld !n necess>ily see ! imp]fections :i* are an inevitable "p ( ! human individual1 & love c atta* itself only to p]fection4 ,love ( a woman is possible only :5 x does n consid] h] real qualities1 & s is able to replace ! actual psy*ical reality by a diff]5t & q imag9>y reality4 ,! attempt to realise "o's ideal 9 a woman1 in/ead ( ! woman h]self1 is a necess>y de/ruction ( ! empirical p]sonality ( ! woman4 ,& s ! attempt is cruel to ! woman2 x is ! egoism ( love t disreg>ds ! woman1 & c>es no?+ = h] real inn] life4 ,?us ! p>allel betwe5 sexuality & love is complete4 ,love is murd]4 ,! sexual impulse de/roys ! body & m9d ( ! woman1 & ! psy*ical eroticism de/roys h] psy*ical exi/5ce4 ,ord9>y sexuality reg>ds ! woman only z a means ( gratify+ passion or ( begett+ *ildr54 ,! high] eroticism is m]ciless to ! woman1 requir+ h] to be m]ely ! vehicle ( a project$ p]sonality1 or ! "m ( psy*ical *ildr54 ,love is n only anti-logical1 z x d5ies ! objective tru? ( ! woman & requires only an illusory image ( h]1 b x is anti-e?ical ) reg>d to h]4 ,i am f> f despis+ ! heights to :i* ?is eroticism may rea*1 z1 = in/ance1 9 ,madonna wor%ip4 ,:o c\ld bl9d 8 eyes to ! amaz+ ph5om5on pres5t$ by ,dante8 ,x 0 an extraord9>y transf]5ce ( 8 own ideal to ! p]son ( a concrete woman :om ! arti/ _h se5 only once & :5 %e 0 a "y girl1 & :o = all he knew might h gr[n up into a ,xantippe4 ,! complete neglect ( :atev] wor? ! woman h]self might h _h1 9 ord] t %e might bett] s]ve z ! vehicle ( 8 project$ conception ( wor?9ess1 0 nev] m cle>ly exhibit$4 ,& ! ?ree-fold immorality ( ?is high] eroticism becomes m pla9 ?an ev]4 ,x is an unlimit$ selfi%ness ) reg>d to ! actual woman1 z %e is :olly reject$ = ! ideal woman4 ,x is a felony t[>ds ! lov] himself1 inasmu* z he deta*es virtue & wor?9ess f himself2 & x is a delib]ate turn+ away f ! tru?1 a pref]r+ ( %am to reality4 ,! la/ =m 9 :i* ! immorality reveals itself is t love prev5ts ! wor?lessness ( woman f be+ realis$1 inasmu* z x always replac$ h] by an imag9>y projection4 ,madonna wor%ip itself is fundam5tally immoral1 inasmu* z x is a %utt+ ( ! eyes to tru?4 ,! ,madonna wor%ip ( ! great arti/s is a de/ruction ( woman1 & is possible only by a complete neglect ( ! wom5 z !y exi/ 9 exp]i5ce1 a replacem5t ( actuality by a symbol1 a re-creation ( woman to s]ve ! purposes ( man1 & a murd] ( woman z %e exi/s4 ,:5 a p>ticul> man attracts a p>ticul> woman ! influ5ce is n 8 beauty4 ,only man has an in/9ct = beauty1 & ! ideals ( bo? manly beauty & ( womanly beauty h be5 creat$ by man1 n by woman4 ,! qualities t appeal to a woman are ! signs ( develop$ sexuality2 ^? t repel h] are ! qualities ( ! high] m9d4 ,woman is ess5tially a phallus wor%ipp]1 & h] wor%ip is p]meat$ ) a fe> l t ( a bird = a snake1 ( a man = ! fabl$ ,m$usa head1 z %e feels t ! object ( h] adoration is ! p[] t w de/roy h]4 ,! c\rse ( my argum5t is n[ app>5t4 ,z logic & e?ics h a relation only to man1 x 0 n to be expect$ t woman w\ld /& 9 any bett] position ) reg>d to /hetics4 /hetics & logic are closely int]connect$1 z is app>5t 9 philosophy1 9 ma!matics1 9 arti/ic "w1 & 9 music4 ,i h n[ %[n ! intimate relation ( /hetics to e?ics4 ,z ,kant %[$1 /hetics1 j z mu* z e?ics & logic1 dep5d on ! free w ( ! subject4 ,z ! woman has n free w1 %e _c h ! faculty ( project+ beauty outside h]self4 ,! =ego+ involves ! proposition t woman _c love4 ,wom5 h made no ideal ( man to correspond ) ! male conception ( ! ,madonna4 ,:at woman requires f man is n purity1 *a/ity1 morality1 b some?+ else4 ,woman is incapable ( desir+ virtue 9 a man4 ,x is almo/ an insoluble riddle t woman1 h]self incapable ( love1 %\ld attract ! love ( man4 ,x has seem$ to me a possible my? or p>able1 t 9 ! beg9n+1 :5 m5 became m5 by "s miracul\s act ( ,god1 a s\l 0 be/[$ only on !m4 ,m51 :5 !y love1 are p>tly consci\s ( ?is deep inju/ice to woman1 & make ! fruitless b h]oic ef=t to give h] _! own s\l4 ,b su* a speculation is outside ! limits ( ei!r sci5ce or philosophy4 ,i h n[ %[n :at woman does n wi%2 !re rema9s to %[ :at %e does wi%1 & h[ ?is wi% is diametrically oppos$ to ! w ( man4 ,,*apt] ,,xii ,,! ,,nature ,,( ,,woman ,,& ,,h] ,,significance ,,9 ,,! ,,univ]se 8,er/ ,mann und ,weib zusamm5 ,ma*5 d5 ,m5s*5 aus40--,,kant4 ,! fur!r we g 9 ! analysis ( woman's claim to e/eem ! m we mu/ d5y h] ( :at is l(ty & noble1 great & beautiful4 ,z ?is *apt] is ab\t to take ! decid+ & mo/ extreme /ep 9 t direction1 ,i %\ld l to make a few rem>ks z to my position4 ,! la/ ?+ ,i wi% to advocate is ! ,asiatic /&po9t ) reg>d to ! treatm5t ( wom54 ,^? :o h c>efully foll[$ my rem>ks z to ! inju/ice t all =ms ( sexuality & erotics visit on woman w surely see t ?is "w is n meant to plead = ! h>em4 ,b x is q possible to desire ! legal equality ( m5 & wom5 )\t believ+ 9 _! moral & intellectual equality1 j z 9 condemn+ to ! utmo/ any h>%ness 9 ! male treatm5t ( ! female sex1 "o does n ov]look ! trem5d\s1 cosmic1 contra/ & organic diff]5ces betwe5 !m4 ,!re are no m5 9 :om !re is no trace ( ! transc5d5t1 :o are altoge!r bad2 & !re is no woman ( :om t c\ld truly be said4 ,h[ev] degrad$ a man may be1 he is immeasurably above ! mo/ sup]ior woman1 s mu* s t comp>ison & classification ( ! two are impossible2 b ev5 s1 no "o has any "r to d5\nce or defame woman1 h[ev] inf]ior %e mu/ be consid]$4 ,a true adju/m5t ( ! claims = legal equality c be und]tak5 on no o!r basis ?an ! recognition ( a complete1 deep-seat$ pol> opposition ( ! sexes4 ,i tru/ t ,i may escape confusion ( my views z to woman ) ! sup]ficial doctr9e ( ,p4 ,j4 ,mbius--a doctr9e only int]e/+ z a brave reaction aga9/ ! g5]al t5d5cy4 ,wom5 are n 8physiologically weak-m9d$10 & ,i _c %>e ! view t wom5 ( conspicu\s ability are to be reg>d$ z morbid specim5s4 ,f a moral po9t ( view "o %\ld only be glad to recognise 9 ^! wom5 7:o are always m mascul9e ?an ! re/7 ! exact opposite ( deg5]ation1 t is to say1 x mu/ be ackn[l$g$ t !y h made a /ep =w>d & ga9$ a victory ov] !mselves2 f ! biological /&po9t !y are j z little or z mu* ph5om5a ( deg5]ation z are womani% m5 7une?ically consid]$74 ,int]m$iate sexual =ms are normal1 n pa?ological ph5om5a1 9 all classes ( organisms1 & _! appe>ance is no pro( ( physical decad5ce4 ,woman is nei!r high-m9d$ nor l[-m9d$1 /rong-m9d$ nor weak-m9d$4 ,%e is ! opposite ( all ^!4 ,m9d _c be pr$icat$ ( h] at all2 %e is m9dless4 ,t1 h[ev]1 does n imply weak-m9d$ness 9 ! ord9>y s5se ( ! t]m1 ! abs5ce ( ! capacity to 8get h] be>+s0 9 ord9>y ev]yday life4 ,cunn+1 calculation1 8clev]ness10 are mu* m usual & con/ant 9 ! woman ?an 9 ! man1 if !re be a p]sonal selfi% end 9 view4 ,a woman is nev] s /upid z a man c be4 ,b has woman no mean+ at all8 ,has %e no g5]al purpose 9 ! s*eme ( ! _w8 ,has %e n a de/9y2 &1 9 spite ( all h] s5selessness & empt9ess1 a significance 9 ! univ]se8 ,has %e a mission1 or is h] exi/5ce an accid5t & an absurdity8 ,9 ord] to und]/& h] mean+1 x is necess>y to />t f a ph5om5on :i*1 al?\gh old & well recognis$1 has nev] receiv$ its prop] me$ ( consid]ation4 ,x is f no?+ m nor less ?an ! ph5om5on ( mat*-mak+ f :i* we may be able to inf] mo/ correctly ! real nature ( woman4 ,its analysis %[s x to be ! =ce :i* br+s toge!r & helps =w>d two p 9 _! k ( "o ano!r1 :i* helps !m to a sexual union1 :e!r 9 ! =m ( m>riage or n4 ,?is desire to br+ ab\t an und]/&+ betwe5 two p is possess$ by all wom5 f _! e>lie/ *ildhood2 ! v y\nge/ girls are always ready to act z mess5g]s = _! si/]s' lov]s4 ,& if ! in/9ct ( mat*-mak+ c be indulg$ 9 only aft] ! p>ticul> woman 9 "q has br\ght ab\t h] own consummation 9 m>riage1 x is none ! less pres5t be=e t "t1 & ! only ?+s :i* are at "w aga9/ x are h] jeal\sy ( h] contempor>ies1 & h] anxiety ab\t _! *ances ) reg>d to h] lov]1 until %e has f9ally secur$ him by reason ( h] money1 h] social position1 & s =?4 ,z soon z wom5 h got rid ( _! own case by _! own m>riage1 !y ha/5 to help ! sons & daught]s ( _! acqua9tances to m>ry4 ,! fact t old] wom51 9 :om ! desire = sexual satisfaction has di$ out1 are su* mat*-mak]s is s fully recognis$ t ! idea has wrongly spread t !y are ! only real mat*-mak]s4 ,!y urge n only wom5 b m5 to m>ry1 a man's own "m (t5 be+ ! mo/ active & p]si/5t advocate ( 8 m>riage4 ,x is ! desire & purpose ( e "m to see h] son m>ri$1 )\t any ?\ght ( 8 individual ta/e2 a wi% :i* "s h be5 bl9d en\gh to reg>d z ano!r *>m 9 mat]nal love1 ( :i* su* a poor acc\nt 0 giv5 9 an e>li] *apt]4 ,x is possible t _m mo!rs may hope t _! sons %\ld obta9 p]man5t happ9ess ?r\gh m>riage1 h[ev] unfit !y may be = x2 b und\bt$ly ?is hope is abs5t ) ! majority1 & 9 any case x is ! mat*-mak+ in/9ct1 ! %e] objection to ba*elordom1 :i* is ! /ronge/ motive ( all4 ,x is cle> t wom5 obey a purely in/9ctive1 inh]5t impulse1 :5 !y try to get _! daught]s m>ri$4 ,x is c]ta9ly n = logical1 & only 9 a small degree = mat]ial reasons1 t !y g to su* l5g?s to atta9 _! ends1 & x is c]ta9ly n because ( any desire express$ by _! daught]s 7v (t5 x is 9 direct opposition to ! girl's *oice72 & s9ce ! mat*-mak+ in/9ct is n conf9$ to ! memb]s ( a woman's own family1 x is impossible to speak ( x z be+ "p ( ! 8altrui/ic0 or 8moral0 attitude ( mat]nal love2 al?\gh mo/ wom5 if !y 7 *>g$ ) mat*-mak+ projects w\ld und\bt$ly answ] 8t x is _! duty to ?9k ( ! future welf>e ( _! de> *ildr540 ,a "m makes no diff]5ce 9 arrang+ a m>riage = h] own daught] & = any o!r girl1 & is j z glad to d x = ! latt] if x does n int]f]e ) ! int]e/s ( h] own family2 x is ! same ?+1 mat*-mak+ ?r\gh\t1 & !re is no psy*ological diff]5ce 9 mak+ a mat* = h] own daught] & do+ ! same ?+ = a /rang]4 ,i w\ld ev5 g s f> z to say t a "m is n inconsolable if a /rang]1 h[ev] common & undesirable1 desires & s$uces h] daught]4 ,! attitude ( "o sex to c]ta9 traits ( ! o!r c (t5 be appli$ z a crit]ion z to h[ f> c]ta9 peculi>ities ( "* are exclusively ! prop]ty ( ! "o sex or are %>$ by ! o!r4 ,s f>1 we h _h to d5y to wom5 _m *>act]s :i* !y w\ld gladly claim1 b :i* are exclusively mascul9e2 9 mat*-mak+1 h[ev]1 we h a *>act]i/ic :i* is really & exclusively fem99e1 ! exceptions be+ ei!r 9 ! case ( v womani% m5 or else special in/ances :i* w be fully dealt ) lat] on1 9 *ap4 xiii4 ,e real man w h no?+ to d ) ?is in/9ct 9 8 wife1 ev5 :5 8 own daught]s1 :om he w\ld gladly see settl$ 9 life1 are conc]n$2 he dislikes & despises ! :ole bus9ess1 & leaves x entirely to 8 wife1 z be+ altoge!r 9 h] prov9ce4 ,?is is a /rik+ in/ance ( a purely fem99e psy*ical *>act]i/ic1 be+ n only unattractive to a man1 b ev5 repulsive to him :5 he is aw>e ( x3 :ile ! male *>act]i/ics 9 !mselves are suffici5t to please ! female1 man has to d5ude woman ( h]s be=e he c love h]4 ,b ! mat*-mak+ in/9ct ex]ts a mu* deep] & m important influ5ce on ! nature ( woman ?an c be ga!r$ f ! little ,i h said on ?is subject4 ,i wi% n[ to draw att5tion to woman's attitude at a play3 %e is always wait+ to see if ! h]o & h]o9e1 ! lov]s 9 ! piece1 w qu>rel4 ,?is is no?+ b mat*-mak+1 & psy*ologically does n diff] a hair f x3 x is ! ev] pres5t desire to see ! man & woman unit$4 ,b t is n all2 ! trem5d\s excitem5t ) :i* wom5 await ! crucial po9t 9 a dec5t or indec5t book is due to no?+ less ?an ! desire to see ! sexual union ( ! pr9cipal *>act]s1 & is c\pl$ ) an actual excitation at ! ?\ght1 & positive appreciation ( ! =ce :i* is beh9d sexual union4 ,x is n possible to /ate ?is =mally & logically1 ! only ?+ is to try & und]/& h[ x is t ! two ?+s are psy*ologically "o ) wom54 ,! "m's excitem5t on h] daught]'s w$d+-day is ( ! same quality z t eng5d]$ by read+ a /ory by ,prvo/1 or ,sud]mann's 8,katz5/eg40 ,x is q true t m5 are v int]e/$ by novels :i* end 9 sexual union1 b 9 q a diff]5t way f wom52 !y ?or\ghly appreciate ! sexual act 9 imag9ation1 b !y d n foll[ ! gradual approa* ( ! two p conc]n$ f ! v beg9n+2 & _! int]e/ does n gr[1 z woman's does1 9 con/ant proportion to ! reciprocal value :i* ! two p h = "o ano!r4 ,! brea?less pleasure ) :i* ! v>i\s ob/acles are ov]come1 ! feel+ ( disappo9tm5t at ea* ?w>t+ ( ! sexual purpose1 is altoge!r womani% & unmanly2 b x is always pres5t ) woman4 ,%e is cont9ually on ! wat* = sexual developm5ts1 :e!r 9 real life or 9 lit]ature4 ,has no "o ev] wond]$ :y wom5 are s ke5 & 8dis9t]e/$0 ab\t br++ o!r m5 & wom5 toge!r8 ,! satisfaction !y d]ive f x arises f a p]sonal /imulus at ! ?\ght ( ! sexual union ( o!rs4 ,b ! full ext5t to :i* mat*-mak+ influ5ces ! po9t ( view ( all wom5 is n yet fully grasp$4 ,on a summ] ev5+ :5 lov]s may be se5 9 d>k corn]s ( public places1 or on ! seats & banks r\nd ab\t1 x is always ! wom5 :o wilfully & curi\sly try to see :at is happ5+1 :il/ m5 :o h to pass t way d s unwill+ly1 look+ ! o!r way1 because ( a s5se ( intrusion4 ,j 9 ! same way x is wom5 :o turn 9 ! /reets to look at ne>ly e c\ple !y meet1 & gaze aft] !m4 ,?is espionage & turn+ r\nd are none ! less 8mat*-mak+10 because !y are sub-consci\s acts4 ,if a man does n want to see a ?+ he turns 8 back on x1 & does n look r\nd2 b wom5 are glad to see two p 9 love ) "o ano!r1 & take pleasure 9 surpris+ !m 9 _! love-mak+1 because ( _! innate & sup]-p]sonal desire t sexual union %\ld occur4 ,b man1 z 0 se5 mu* fur!r back1 only c>es = t :i* has a positive value4 ,a woman :5 %e sees two lov]s toge!r is always await+ developm5ts1 t is to say1 %e expects1 anticipates1 hopes1 & desires an outcome4 ,i "k an eld]ly m>ri$ woman :o li/5$ expectantly at ! door = "s "t1 :5 a s]vant ( h]s _h all[$ h] swee!>t to come into h] room1 be=e %e walk$ 9 & gave h] notice4 ,! idea ( union is always eag]ly grasp$ & nev] repell$ :atev] =m x may take 7ev5 :]e animals are conc]n$74#ah ,%e exp]i5ces no disgu/ at ! nauseat+ details ( ! subject1 & makes no attempt to ?9k ( any?+ pleasant]4 ,?is acc\nts = a great deal ( :at is s app>5tly my/]i\s 9 ! psy*ic life ( woman4 ,h] wi% = ! activity ( h] own sexual life is h] /ronge/ impulse1 b x is only a special case ( h] deep1 h] only vital int]e/1 ! int]e/ t sexual unions %all take place2 ! wi% t z mu* ( x z possible %all occur1 9 all cases1 places1 & times4 #ah ,! "o app>5t exception to ?is rule is fully discuss$ 9 ?is *apt]4 ,?is univ]sal desire may ei!r be conc5trat$ on ! act itself or on ! 7possible7 *ild2 9 ! fir/ case1 ! woman is ( ! pro/itute type & p>ticipates m]ely = ! sake ( ! act2 9 ! second1 %e is ( ! "m type1 b n m]ely ) ! idea ( be>+ *ildr5 h]self2 %e desires t e m>riage %e kn[s ( or has help$ to br+ ab\t %\ld be fruitful1 & ! ne>] %e is to ! absolute "m ! m conspicu\s is ?is idea2 ! real "m is also ! real gr&mo!r 7ev5 if %e rema9s a virg92 ,johann ,tesman's m>vell\s portrayal ( 8,tante ,jule0 9 ,ibs5's 8,h$da ,gabl]0 is an example ( :at ,i mean74 ,e real "m has ! same purpose1 t ( help+ on matrimony2 %e is ! "m ( all mank9d2 %e welcomes e pregnancy4 ,! pro/itute does n want o!r wom5 to be ) *ild1 b to be pro/itutes l h]self4 ,a woman's relations ) m>ri$ m5 %[ h[ %e subord9ates h] own sexuality to h] mat*-mak+ in/9ct1 ! latt] be+ ! dom9ant p[]4 ,woman objects m /rongly to ba*elordom ?an any?+ else1 because %e is altoge!r a mat*-mak]1 & ?is makes h] try to get m5 to m>ry2 b if a man is already m>ri$ %e at once loses mo/ ( h] int]e/ 9 him1 h[ev] mu* %e lik$ him be=e4 ,if ! woman h]self is already m>ri$1 t is to say1 :5 ea* man %e meets is n a possible solution to h] own fate1 "o w\ld n imag9e t a m>ri$ man w\ld f9d less fav\r ) h] because he 0 m>ri$ ?an :5 he 0 a ba*elor if ! woman h]self is unfai?ful2 b wom5 seldom c>ry on an intrigue ) ano!r woman's husb&1 except :5 !y wi% to triumph ov] h] by mak+ him neglect h]4 ,?is %[s t ! disposition ( woman is t[>ds ! fact ( pair+2 :5 m5 are already pair$ %e seldom attempts to make !m unfai?ful1 = ! fact ( _! be+ pair$ has satisfi$ h] in/9ct4 ,?is mat*-mak+ is ! mo/ common *>act]i/ic ( ! human female2 ! wi% to become a "m-9-law is mu* m g5]al ?an ev5 ! desire to become a "m1 ! int5sity & ext5t ( :i* is usually ov]-rat$4 ,my read]s may possibly n und]/& ! emphasis ,i h laid on a ph5om5on :i* is usually look$ ^u z amus+ z x is disgu/+2 & x may be ?\ght t ,i h giv5 undue importance to x4 ,b let u see :y ,i h done s4 ,mat*-mak+ is ess5tially ! ph5om5on ( all o!rs :i* gives u ! key to ! nature ( woman1 & we mu/ n1 z has always be5 ! case1 m]ely ackn[l$ge ! fact & pass on1 b we %\ld try to analyse & expla9 x4 ,"o ( our commone/ phrases runs3 8,e woman is a bit ( a mat*-mak]40 ,b we mu/ rememb] t 9 ?is1 & no?+ else1 lies ! actual ess5ce ( woman4 ,aft] mature consid]ation ( ! mo/ v>i$ types ( wom5 & ) due reg>d to ! special classes besides ^? :i* ,i h discuss$1 ,i am ( op9ion t ! only positively g5]al female *>act]i/ic is t ( mat*-mak+1 t is1 h] uni=m will+ness to fur!r ! idea ( sexual union4 ,any def9ition ( ! nature ( woman :i* goes no fur!r ?an to decl>e t %e has ! /rong in/9ct = h] own union w\ld be too n>r[2 any def9ition t w\ld l9k h] in/9cts to ! *ild or to ! husb&1 or to bo?1 w\ld be too wide4 ,! mo/ g5]al & compreh5sive /atem5t ( ! nature ( woman is t x is completely adapt$ & dispos$ = ! special mission ( aid+ & abett+ ! bodily union ( ! sexes4 ,all wom5 are mat*-mak]s1 & ?is prop]ty ( ! woman to be ! advocate ( ! idea ( pair+ is ! only "o :i* is f\nd 9 wom5 ( all ages1 9 "y girls1 9 adults1 & 9 ! ag$4 ,! old woman is no long] int]e/$ 9 h] own union1 b %e devotes h]self to ! pair+ ( o!rs4 ,?is habit ( ! old woman is no?+ new1 x is only ! cont9uance ( h] endur+ in/9ct surviv+ ! complications t 7 caus$ :5 h] p]sonal int]e/s came into conflict ) h] g5]al desire2 x is ! n[ unselfi% pursuit ( ! imp]sonal idea4 ,x is conv5i5t to recapitulate at ?is po9t :at my inve/igation has %[n z to ! sexuality ( wom54 ,i h %[n t woman is engross$ exclusively by sexuality1 n int]mitt5tly1 b ?r\gh\t h] life2 t h] :ole be+1 bodily & m5tal1 is no?+ b sexuality itself4 ,i add$1 moreov]1 t %e 0 s con/itut$ t h] :ole body & be+ cont9ually 7 9 sexual relations ) h] environm5t1 & t j z ! sexual organs 7 ! c5tre ( woman physically1 s ! sexual idea 0 ! c5tre ( h] m5tal nature4 ,! idea ( pair+ is ! only conception :i* has positive wor? = wom54 ,! woman is ! be>] ( ! ?\ght ( ! cont9uity ( ! species4 ,! high value :i* %e atta*es to ! idea ( pair+ is n selfi% & individual1 x is sup]-individual1 &1 if ,i may be =giv5 ! desecration ( ! phrase1 x is ! transc5d5tal function ( woman4 ,& j z femal5ess is no m ?an ! embodim5t ( ! idea ( pair+1 s is x sexuality 9 ! ab/ract4 ,pair+ is ! supreme good = ! woman2 %e seeks to effect x always & ev]y:]e4 ,h] p]sonal sexuality is only a special case ( ?is univ]sal1 g5]alis$1 imp]sonal in/9ct4 ,! ef=t ( woman to realise ?is idea ( pair+ is s fundam5tally oppos$ to t conception ( innoc5ce & purity1 ! high] virg9ity :i* man's erotic nature has dem&$ f wom51 t n all 8 erotic inc5se w\ld h obscur$ h] real nature b = "o factor4 ,i h n[ to expla9 ?is factor :i* has veil$ f man ! true nature ( woman1 & :i* 9 itself is "o ( ! deepe/ problems ( woman1 ,i mean h] absolute duplicity4 ,h] pair+ in/9ct & h] duplicity1 ! latt] s great z to conceal ev5 f woman h]self :at is ! real ess5ce ( h] nature1 mu/ be expla9$ toge!r4 ,all t may h seem$ l cle> ga9 is n[ aga9 call$ into "q4 ,self-obs]vation 0 f\nd lack+ 9 wom51 & yet !re c]ta9ly are wom5 :o obs]ve v closely all t happ5s to !m4 ,!y 7 d5i$ ! love ( tru?1 & yet "o kn[s _m wom5 :o w\ld n tell a lie = any?+4 ,x has be5 said t !y are lack+ 9 consci\sness ( guilt2 b !re are _m wom5 :o reproa* !mselves bitt]ly = mo/ trifl+ matt]s1 besides 8p5it5ts0 :o mortify _! fle%4 ,mode/y 0 left to man1 b :at is to be said ( ! womanly mode/y1 t ba%fulness1 :i*1 accord+ to ,ham]l+1 only wom5 h8 ,is !re no f\ndation = ! way 9 :i* ! idea has gr[n & f\nd su* acceptance8 ,& !n aga93 ,c religion be abs5t1 9 spite ( s _m 8pr(ess+0 wom58 ,are we to exclude all wom5 f ! moral purity1 all ! womanly virtues1 :i* poets & hi/orians h ascrib$ to h]8 ,are we to say t woman is m]ely sexual1 t sexuality only receives its prop] due f h] :5 x is s well kn[n t wom5 are %ock$ at ! slighte/ allusion to sexual matt]s1 t in/ead ( giv+ way to x !y are (t5 irritat$ & disgu/$ at ! idea ( impurity1 & q (t5 dete/ sexual union = !mselves & reg>d x j z _m m5 d8 ,x is1 ( c\rse1 manife/ t "o & ! same po9t is b\nd up 9 all ^! anti!ses1 & on ! answ] giv5 to !m dep5ds ! f9al & decisive judgm5t on woman4 ,& x is cle> t if only "o s+le female creature 7 really asexual1 or c\ld be %[n to h a real relation%ip to ! idea ( p]sonal moral wor?1 ev]y?+ t ,i h said ab\t woman1 its g5]al value z psy*ically *>act]i/ic ( ! sex1 w\ld be irretrievably demoli%$1 & ! :ole position :i* ?is book has tak5 up w\ld be %att]$ at "o bl[4 ,^! app>5tly contradictory ph5om5a mu/ be satisfactorily expla9$1 & x mu/ be %[n t :at is at ! bottom ( x all & makes x seem s equivocal arises f ! v nature ( woman :i* ,i h be5 try+ to expla9 all along4 ,9 ord] to und]/& ^! fallaci\s contradictions "o mu/ fir/ ( all rememb] ! trem5d\s 8accessibility10 to use ano!r ^w1 ! 8impressionability10 ( wom54 ,_! extraord9>y aptitude = any?+ new1 & _! easy acceptance ( o!r p's views h n yet be5 suffici5tly emphasis$ 9 ?is book4 ,z a rule1 ! woman adapts h]self to ! man1 8 views become h]s1 8 likes & dislikes are %>$ by h]1 e ^w he says is an inc5tive to h]1 & ! /rong] 8 sexual influ5ce on h] ! m ?is is s4 ,woman does n p]ceive t ?is influ5ce :i* man has on h] causes h] to deviate f ! l9e ( h] own developm5t2 %e does n look ^u x z a sort ( unw>rantable intrusion2 %e does n try to %ake (f :at is really an invasion ( h] private life2 %e is n a%am$ ( be+ receptive2 on ! contr>y1 %e is really pleas$ :5 %e c be s1 & pref]s man to m\ld h] m5tally4 ,%e rejoices 9 be+ dep5d5t1 & h] expectations f man resolve !mselves into ! mom5t :5 %e may be p]fectly passive4 ,b x is n only f h] lov] 7al?\gh %e w\ld l t be/71 b also f h] fa!r & "m1 uncles & aunts1 bro!rs & si/]s1 ne> relations & di/ant acqua9tances1 t a woman takes :at %e ?9ks & believes1 be+ only too glad to get h] op9ions 8ready made40 ,x is n only inexp]i5c$ girls b ev5 eld]ly & m>ri$ wom5 :o copy ea* o!r 9 ev]y?+1 f ! nice new dress or pretty coiffure d[n to ! places :]e !y get _! ?+s1 & ! v recipes by :i* !y cook4 ,& x nev] seems to occur to !m t !y are do+ some?+ d]ogatory on _! "p1 z x ought to d if !y possess$ an individuality ( _! own & /rove to "w out _! own salvation4 ,a woman's ?\ghts & actions h no def9ite1 indep5d5t relations to ?+s 9 !mselves2 !y are n ! result ( ! reaction ( h] individuality to ! _w4 ,!y accept :at is impos$ on !m gladly1 & adh]e to x ) ! greate/ firmness4 ,t is :y woman is s intol]ant :5 !re has be5 a brea* ( conv5tional laws4 ,i mu/ quote an amus+ in/ance1 be>+ on ?is side ( woman's "*1 f ,h]b]t ,sp5c]4 ,x is ! cu/om 9 v>i\s tribes ( ,indians 9 ,nor? & ,s\? ,am]ica = ! m5 to hunt & fight & leave all ! labori\s & m5ial tasks to _! wives4 ,! ,dakotan wom5 are s imbu$ ) ! idea ( ! reasonabl5ess & fitness ( ?is arrangem5t t1 in/ead ( feel+ injur$ by x1 ! greate/ insult t "o ( ^! wom5 c (f] to ano!r w\ld be impli$ 9 "s su* words z foll[s3 8,y disgraceful creature4444 ,i saw y\r husb& c>ry+ home wood = ! fires4 ,:at 0 8 wife do+ t he _h to demean himself by do+ woman's "w80 ,! extraord9>y way 9 :i* woman c be influ5c$ by ext]nal ag5cies is simil> 9 its nature to h] sugge/ibility1 :i* is f> great] & m g5]al ?an man's2 !y are bo? 9 accordance ) woman's desire to play ! passive & nev] ! active "p 9 ! sexual act & all t leads to x4#ai #ai ,! quiesc5t1 inactive1 l>ge egg-cells are s\ght out by ! mobile1 active1 & sl5d] sp]matozoa4 ,x is ! univ]sal passivity ( woman's nature :i* makes h] accept & assume man's valuations ( ?+s1 al?\gh ^! are utt]ly at v>iance ) h] nature4 ,! way 9 :i* woman c be impregnat$ ) ! mascul9e po9t ( view1 ! saturation ( h] inn]mo/ ?\ghts ) a =eign elem5t1 h] false recognition ( morality1 :i* _c be call$ hypocrisy because x does n conceal any?+ anti-moral1 h] assumption & practise ( ?+s :i* 9 !mselves are n 9 h] realm1 are all v well if ! woman does n try to use h] own judgm5t1 & !y succe$ 9 keep+ up ! fiction ( h] sup]ior morality4 ,complications fir/ arise :5 ^! acquir$ valuations come into collision ) ! only inborn1 g5u9e1 & univ]sally fem99e valuation1 ! supreme value %e sets on pair+4 ,woman's acceptance ( pair+ z ! supreme good is q unconsci\s on h] "p4 ,z %e has no s5se ( individuality %e has no?+ to contra/ ) pair+2 & s1 unlike man1 %e _c realise its significance1 or ev5 notice ! pres5ce 9 h]self ( ?is in/9ct4 ,no woman kn[s1 or ev] has kn[n1 or ev] w "k1 :at %e does :5 %e ent]s into association ) man4 ,femal5ess is id5tical ) pair+1 & a woman w\ld h to get outside h]self 9 ord] to see & und]/& t %e pairs4 ,?us x is t ! deepe/ desire ( woman1 all t %e means1 & all t %e is1 rema9 unrecognis$ by h]4 ,!re is no?+1 !n1 to prev5t ! male negative valuation ( pair+ ov]%ad[+ ! female positive valuation ( x 9 ! consci\sness ( ! woman4 ,! susceptibility ( woman is s great t %e c ev5 act 9 opposition to :at %e is1 to ! "o ?+ on :i* %e really sets a positive value6 ,b ! impo/ure :i* %e enacts :5 %e all[s h]self to be incorporat$ ) man's op9ions ( sexuality & %amelessness1 ev5 ( ! impo/ure itself1 & :5 %e uses ! mascul9e /&>d = h] actions1 is su* a colossal fraud t %e is nev] consci\s ( x2 %e has acquir$ a second nature1 )\t ev5 guess+ t x is n h] real "o2 %e takes h]self s]i\sly1 believes %e is some?+ & t %e believes 9 some?+2 %e is conv9c$ ( ! s9c]ity & orig9ality ( h] moralis+s & op9ions2 ! lie is z deeply root$ z t2 x is organic4 ,i _c d bett] ?an speak ( ! ontological untru?fulness ( woman4 ,wolfram von ,es*5ba* says ( 8 h]o3 8444 ,s keus* und re9 ,ruht' er bei se9] ,knig91 ,dass ke9 ,g5g5 fnd' d>9 ,s man*es ,weib beim lieb5 ,mann4 ,dass do* s man*e 9 ,g$ank5 ,zur ppigkeit w b]s*wank51 ,die son/ si* sprde zeig5 kann6 ,vor ,fremd5 z*tig sie ers*e951 ,do* i/ des ,h]z5s tief/es ,me95 ,das ,wid]spiel vom uss]n ,s*e940 ,wolfram indicates cle>ly en\gh :at is at ! bottom ( woman's he>t1 b he does n say all t is to be said4 ,wom5 deceive !mselves z well z o!rs on ?is po9t4 ,"o _c artificially suppress & supplant "o's real nature1 ! physical z well z ! o!r side1 )\t some?+ happ5+4 ,! hygi5ic p5alty t mu/ be paid = woman's d5ial ( h] real nature is hy/]ia4 ,( all ! neurotic & psy*ic ph5om5a1 ^? ( hy/]ia are ! mo/ fasc9at+ = psy*ologi/s2 !y repres5t a f> m difficult &1 !re=e1 a m int]e/+ /udy ?an ^? obs]v$ 9 melan*olia or 9 simple p>anoia4 ,! majority ( psy*iatri/s h a di/ru/ ( psy*ological analyses :i* x is n easy = !m to %ake (f2 e /atem5t ( pa?ological alt]ation ( tissues or intoxication by c]ta9 means is = !m a lim9e cr$ible2 x is only 9 psy*ical matt]s t !y refuse to recognise a prim>y cause4 ,b s9ce no reason has s f> be5 giv5 :y psy*ical ph5om5a %\ld be ( importance second>y to physical ph5om5a1 x is q ju/ifiable to disreg>d su* prejudices4 ,x is q possible--!re is no?+ to prev5t x be+ s--t a v great deal1 p]haps ev]y?+1 may dep5d on ! prop] int]pretation ( ! 8psy*ical me*anism0 ( hy/]ia4 ,t ?is is s is prov$ by ! fact t ! few conclusions ( any value ) ref]5ce to hy/]ia s f> discov]$ h be5 arriv$ at 9 ?is way2 ! inve/igations c>ri$ out by ,pi]re ,janet1 ,osk> ,vogt1 & p>ticul>ly by ,j4 ,breu] & ,s4 ,freud1 %[ :at ,i mean4 ,all good "w on hy/]ia w und\bt$ly foll[ ! l9es ^! m5 h work$ on2 t is to say1 by inve/igation ( ! psy*ological processes :i* l$ up to ! disease4 ,i believe myself t :at may be call$ a psy*ological sexual traumatism is at ! root ( hy/]ia4 ,! typical picture ( a hy/]ical case is n v diff]5t f ! foll[+3 ,a woman has always accept$ ! male views on sexual matt]s2 !y are 9 reality totally =eign to h] nature1 & sometime1 by "s *ance1 out ( ! conflict betwe5 :at h] nature ass]ts to be true & :at %e has always accept$ z true & believ$ to be true1 !re comes :at may be call$ a 8w\nd+ ( ! m9d40 ,x is ?us possible = ! p]son affect$ to decl>e a sexual desire to be an 8extrane\s body 9 h] consci\sness10 a s5sation :i* %e ?9ks %e dete/s1 b :i* 9 reality has its orig9 9 h] own nature4 ,! trem5d\s int5sity ) :i* %e endeav\rs to suppress ! desire 7& :i* only s]ves to increase x7 s t %e may ! m vehem5tly & indignantly reject ! ?\ght--^! are ! alt]nations :i* are se5 9 hy/]ia4 ,& ! *ronic untru?fulness ( woman becomes acute if ! woman has ev] all[$ h]self to be imbu$ ) man's e?ically negative valuation ( sexuality4 ,x is well kn[n t hy/]ical wom5 manife/ ! /ronge/ sugge/ibility ) m54 ,hy/]ia is ! organic crisis ( ! organic untru?fulness ( woman4 ,i d n d5y t !re are hy/]ical m51 b ^! are comp>atively few2 & s9ce man's psy*ic possibilities are endless1 t ( becom+ 8female0 is among/ !m1 &1 !re=e1 he c be hy/]ical4 ,!re are und\bt$ly _m untru?ful m51 b 9 !m ! crisis takes a diff]5t =m1 man's untru?fulness be+ ( a diff]5t k9d & nev] s hopeless 9 "* z woman's4 ,?is exam9ation into ! organic untru?fulness ( woman1 into h] inability to be hone/ ab\t h]self :i* alone makes x possible = h] to ?9k t %e ?9ks :at is really totally oppos$ to h] nature1 appe>s to me to (f] a satisfactory explanation ( ^? difficulties :i* ! tiology ( hy/]ia pres5t4 ,hy/]ia %[s t untru?fulness1 h[ev] f> x may rea*1 _c suppress ev]y?+4 ,by education or environm5t woman adopts a :ole sy/em ( ideas & valuations :i* are =eign to h]1 or1 r1 has pati5tly submitt$ to h !m impress$ on h]2 & x w\ld ne$ a trem5d\s %ock to get rid ( ?is /rongly-root$ psy*ical complexity1 & to transplant woman to t condition ( intellectual helplessness :i* is s *>act]i/ic ( hy/]ia4 ,an extraord9>y %ock suffices to de/roy ! artificial /ructure1 & to place woman 9 ! ar5a to und]take a fight betwe5 h] unconsci\s1 oppress$ nature1 & h] c]ta9ly consci\s b unnatural m9d4 ,! see-saw+ :i* n[ beg9s betwe5 ! two expla9s ! unusual psy*ic discont9uity dur+ ! hy/]ical phase1 ! cont9ual *anges ( mood1 none ( :i* are subject to ! control ( a dom9ant1 c5tral1 controll+ nucleus ( individuality4 ,x is extraord9>y h[ _m contradictions c co-exi/ 9 ! hy/]ical4 ,sometimes !y are highly intellig5t & able to judge correctly & ke5ly oppose hypnotism & s =?4 ,!n1 aga91 !y are excit$ by mo/ trivial causes1 & are mo/ subject to hypnotic trances4 ,sometimes !y are abnormally *a/e1 at o!r times extremely s5sual4 ,all ?is is no long] difficult to expla94 ,! absolute s9c]ity1 ! pa9ful love ( tru?1 ! avoidance ( ev]y?+ sexual1 ! c>eful judgm5t1 & ! /r5g? ( w--all ^! =m "p ( t spuri\s p]sonality :i* woman 9 h] passivity has tak5 ^u h]self to exhibit to h]self & to ! _w at l>ge4 ,ev]y?+ t belongs to h] orig9al temp]am5t & h] real s5se =m t 8o!r self10 t 8unconsci\s m9d0 :i* c delight 9 obscurities & :i* is s op5 to sugge/ion4 ,x has be5 endeav\r$ to %[ t 9 :at is kn[n z ! 8duplex0 & 8multiplex p]sonality10 ! 8d\ble consci5ce10 ! 8dual ego10 lies "o ( ! /ronge/ argum5ts aga9/ ! belief 9 ! s\l4 ,z a matt] ( fact1 ^! ph5om5a are ! v reasons :y we ought to believe 9 a s\l4 ,! 8divid+ up ( ! p]sonality0 is only possible :5 !re nev] has be5 a p]sonality1 z ) woman4 ,all ! celebrat$ cases :i* ,janet has describ$ 9 8 book1 8,l',automatisme ,psy*ologique10 conc]n wom51 n 9 a s+le in/ance man4 ,x is only woman :o1 m9us s\l or an intelligible ego1 has n ! p[] to become consci\s ( :at is 9 h]2 :o _c ?r[ ! light ( tru? on h] inmo/ self2 :o c by h] completely passive inundation by a consci\sness belong+ to ano!r1 all[ :at is 9 h] own nature to be suppress$ by an extrane\s elem5t2 :o c display ! hy/]ical ph5om5a describ$ by ,janet4 ,hy/]ia is ! bankruptcy ( ?is sup]ficial %am self :i* has be5 put on1 & ! woman becomes = ! "t be+ a tabula rasa1 :il/ ! work+ 9 h] ( h] own g5u9e nature appe>s to h] z some?+ com+ f )\t4 ,?is app>5t 8second>y p]sonality10 ?is 8=eign body 9 ! consci\sness10 ?is false self1 is1 9 reality1 ! true female nature1 sexuality itself appe>+1 & a prop] und]/&+ ( ?is fact1 & ( ! complications t mu/ ensue f ! ebb+s & fl[+s ( ! false1 suppos$ to be true1 & ! true suppos$ to be false1 lie at ! root ( ! mo/ difficult ph5om5a ( hy/]ia4 ,woman's incapacity = tru?--:i* ,i hold to be consequ5t on h] lack ( free w ) reg>d to ! tru?1 9 accordance ) ,kant's 8,indet]m9ism0--conditions h] falsity4 ,any "o :o has _h any?+ to d ) wom5 kn[s h[ (t5 !y give (fh& q pat5tly untrue reasons = :at !y h said or done1 "u ! mom5t>y necessity ( answ]+ a "q4 ,x is1 h[ev]1 hy/]ical subjects :o are mo/ c>eful to avoid unv]acity 79 a mo/ m>k$ & prem$itat$ way be=e /rang]s72 b h[ev] p>adoxical x may s\nd x is exactly 9 ?is t _! untru?fulness lies6 ,!y d n "k t ?is desire = tru? has come to !m f outside & is no "p ( _! real nature4 ,!y h slavi%ly accept$ ! po/ulate ( morality1 &1 !re=e1 wi% to %[ at e opportunity1 l a good s]vant1 h[ fai?fully !y foll[ in/ructions4 ,x is always suspici\s :5 a man is frequ5tly spok5 ( z exceptionally tru/wor?y3 he mu/ h gone out ( 8 way to let p "k x1 & x w\ld be safe to wag] t 9 reality he is a rogue4 ,no confid5ce mu/ be plac$ 9 ! g5u95ess ( hy/]ical morality1 :i* doctors 7no d\bt 9 good fai?7 (t5 emphasise by rem>ks z to ! high moral position ( _! pati5ts4 ,i repeat3 hy/]ical pati5ts d n consci\sly simulate4 ,x c only be made cle> to !m by sugge/ion t !y actually h be5 simulat+1 & all ! 8confessions0 ( ! dissimulation c only be expla9$ 9 ! same way4 ,o!rwise !y believe 9 _! own natural hone/y & morality4 ,nei!r are ! v>i\s ?+s :i* torture !m imag9>y2 x is mu* m likely t 9 ! fact t !y feel !m1 & t ! symptoms fir/ disappe> ) :at ,breu] calls 8ca?>sis0 7! successive br++ to _! consci\sness ( ! true causes ( _! illness by hypnotism71 lies ! pro( ( _! organic untru?fulness4 ,! self-accusations :i* hy/]ical p are s full ( are no?+ b unconsci\s dissimulation4 ,! s5se ( guilt1 :i* is equally poignant 9 great & mo/ trifl+ ?+s1 _c be g5u9e2 if ! hy/]ical self-tortur]s possess$ a /&>d ( morality = !mselves & o!rs !y w\ld n be s indiscrim9ate 9 _! self-accusations1 & n ca/ z mu* blame on !mselves = a slight error z = real wrong-do+4 ,! mo/ di/+ui%+ "* ( ! unconsci\s untru?fulness ( _! self-reproa*es is _! habit ( tell+ o!rs h[ wick$ !y are1 :at t]rible ?+s !y h done1 & !n !y ask if !y 7! hy/]ical7 are n hopelessly ab&on$ sort ( p4 ,no "o :o really feels remorse c\ld talk 9 su* a way4 ,! fallacy ( repres5t+ ! hy/]ical z be+ em95tly moral is "o :i* ev5 ,breu] & ,freud h %>$4 ,! hy/]ical simply become imbu$ ) moral ideas :i* are =eign to !m 9 _! normal /ate4 ,!y subord9ate !mselves to ?is code1 !y cease to prove ?+s = !mselves1 !y no long] ex]cise _! own judgm5t4 ,probably ^! hy/]ical subjects approa* m closely ?an any o!r natures to ! moral ideal ( ! social & utilit>ian e?ics :i* reg>d a lie z moral if x is = ! good ( society or ( ! race4 ,hy/]ical wom5 realise t ideal ontog5etically inasmu* z _! /&>d ( morality comes f )\t1 n f )91 & practically z !y appe> to act mo/ readily f altrui/ic motives4 ,= !m duty t[>ds o!rs is n m]ely a special application ( duty t[>ds oneself4 ,! untru?fulness ( ! hy/]ical is proportional to _! belief 9 _! own accuracy4 ,f _! complete inability to atta9 p]sonal tru?1 to be hone/ ab\t !mselves--! hy/]ical nev] ?9k = !mselves1 !y want o!r p to ?9k ab\t !m1 !y want to ar\se ! int]e/ ( o!rs--x foll[s t ! hy/]ical are ! be/ m$iums = hypnotic purposes4 ,b any "o :o all[s him or h]self to be hypnotis$ is do+ ! mo/ immoral ?+ possible4 ,x is yield+ to complete slav]y2 x is a r5unciation ( ! w & consci\sness2 x means all[+ ano!r p]son to d :at he likes ) ! subject4 ,hypnosis %[s h[ all possibility ( tru? dep5ds ^u ! wi% to be tru?ful1 b x mu/ be ! real wi% ( ! p]son conc]n$3 :5 a hypnotis$ p]son is told to d some?+1 he does x :5 he comes out ( ! trance1 & if ask$ 8 reasons w give a plausible motive on ! spot1 n only be=e o!rs1 b he w ju/ify 8 action to himself by q fanciful reasons4 ,9 ?is we h1 s to speak1 an exp]im5tal pro( ( ,kant's 8,e?ical ,code40 ,all wom5 c be hypnotis$ & l be+ hypnotis$1 b ?is proclivity is exagg]at$ 9 hy/]ical wom54 ,ev5 ! memory ( def9ite ev5ts 9 _! life c be de/roy$ by ! m]e sugge/ion ( ! hypnotis]4 ,breu]'s exp]im5ts on hypnotis$ pati5ts %[ cle>ly t ! consci\sness ( guilt 9 !m is n deeply seat$1 z o!rwise x c\ld n be got rid ( at ! m]e sugge/ion ( ! hypnotis]4 ,b ! %am conviction ( responsibility1 s readily exhibit$ by wom5 ( hy/]ical con/itution1 rapidly disappe>s at ! mom5t :5 nature1 ! sexual impulse1 appe>s to drive ?r\gh ! sup]ficial re/ra9ts4 ,9 ! hy/]ical p>oxysm :at happ5s is t ! woman1 :ile no long] believ+ x altoge!r h]self1 assev]ates m & m l\dly3 8,i d n want t at all1 "s "o n really me is =c+ x on me1 b ,i d n want x at all40 ,e /imulation f outside w n[ be br\ght into relation ) t dem&1 :i* z %e p>tly believes1 is be+ =c$ on h]1 b :i*1 9 reality1 corresponds ) ! deepe/ wi% ( h] nature4 ,t is :y wom5 9 a hy/]ical attack are s easily s$uc$4 ,! 8attitudes passionelles0 ( ! hy/]ical are m]ely passionate repudiations ( sexual desire1 :i* are l\d m]ely because !y are n real1 & are m pla9tive ?an at o!r times because ! dang] is great]4 ,x is easy to und]/& :y ! sexual exp]i5ces ( ! "t prec$+ pub]ty play s l>ge a "p 9 acute hy/]ia4 ,! influ5ce ( extrane\s moral views c be impos$ comp>atively easily on ! *ild1 z !y h little to ov]come 9 ! almo/ unawak5$ /ate ( ! sexual incl9ations4 ,b1 lat] on1 ! suppress$1 al?\gh n :olly vanqui%$1 nature lays hold ( ^! old exp]i5ces1 re9t]prets !m 9 ! light ( ! new cont5ts ( consci\sness1 & ! crisis takes place4 ,! diff]5t =ms t ! p>oxysms assume & _! %ift+ nature are due v l>gely to ! fact t ! subject does n admit ! true cause1 ! pres5ce ( a sexual desire1 any consci\sness ( x be+ attribut$ by h] to "s extrane\s influ5ce1 "s self t is n h] 8real self40 ,m$ical obs]vation or int]pretation ( hy/]ia is wrong2 x all[s itself to be deceiv$ by ! pati5ts1 :o 9 turn deceive !mselves4 ,x is n ! reject+ ego b ! reject$ :i* is ! true & orig9al nature ( ! hy/]ical pati5ts1 h[ev] mu* !y pret5d to !mselves & o!rs t x is =eign to !m4 ,if ! reject+ ego 7 really _! natural ego !y c\ld act 9 opposition to ! di/urb+ elem5t :i* !y say is =eign to !m1 & be fully consci\s ( x1 & diff]5tiate & recognise x 9 _! memory4 ,b ! fraud is evid5t1 because ! reject+ ego is only borr[$1 & !y lack ! c\rage to look _! own desire 9 ! face1 al?\gh some?+ seems to say t x is ! real1 inborn1 & only p[]ful "o !y h4 ,ev5 ! desire itself has no real id5tity1 = x is n seat$ 9 a real individual1 &1 z x is suppress$1 leaps1 s to speak1 f "o "p ( ! body to ! o!r4 ,x may be t my attempt at an explanation w be ?\ght fanciful1 b at lea/ x appe>s to be true t ! v>i\s =ms ( hy/]ia are "o & ! same ?+4 ,?is "o ?+ is :at ! hy/]ical pati5t w n admit is "p ( h]1 al?\gh x is :at is press+ on h]4 ,if %e 7 able to ascribe x to h]self & criticise x 9 ! way 9 :i* %e admits trivial matt]s ( ano!r k9d1 %e w\ld be 9 a measure outside & above h] own exp]i5ces4 ,! frantic rage ( hy/]ical wom5 at :at !y say is impos$ on !m by "s /range w1 :il/ x 9 reality is _! own w1 %[s t !y are j z mu* "u ! dom9ation ( sexuality z are non-hy/]ical wom51 are j z subject to _! de/9y & incapable ( av]t+ x1 s9ce !y1 too1 are )\t any intelligible1 free ego4 ,b x may be ask$1 ) reason1 :y all wom5 are n hy/]ical1 s9ce all wom5 are li>s8 ,?is br+s u to a necess>y inquiry z to ! hy/]ical con/itution4 ,if my !ory has be5 on ! "r l9es1 x ought to be able to give an answ] 9 accordance ) facts4 ,accord+ to x1 ! hy/]ical woman is "o :o has passively accept$ 9 entirety ! mascul9e & conv5tional valuations in/ead ( all[+ h] own m5tal "* its prop] play4 ,! woman :o is n to be l$ is ! anti!sis ( ! hy/]ical woman4 ,i mu/ n delay ov] ?is po9t2 x really belongs to special female *>act]ology4 ,! hy/]ical woman is hy/]ical because %e is s]vile2 m5tally %e is id5tical ) ! maid-s]vant4 ,h] opposite 7:o does n really exi/7 is ! %rewi% dame4 ,s t wom5 may be subdivid$ into ! maid :o s]ves1 & ! woman :o comm&s4#bj #bj ,we may f9d ! analogy to ?is 9 m53 !re are mascul9e 8s]vants0 :o are s by nature1 & !re is ! mascul9e =m ( ! %rew--e4g41 ! policeman4 ,x is a noticeable fact t a policeman usually f9ds 8 sexual complem5t 9 ! h\semaid4 ,! s]vant is born & n made1 & !re are _m wom5 9 good circum/ances :o are 8born s]vants10 al?\gh !y nev] ne$ to put _! rightful position to ! te/6 ,! s]vant & ! mi/ress are a sort ( 8complete woman0 :5 consid]$ z a 8:ole40#ba #ba ,a real dame w\ld nev] dream ( ask+ h] husb& :at %e 0 to d1 :at %e is to give him = d9n]1 c42 ! hy/]ical woman1 on ! contr>y1 is always lack+ 9 ideas1 & wants sugge/ions f o!rs4 ,?is is a r\gh way ( indicat+ ! two types4 ,! consequ5ces ( ?is !ory are fully borne out by exp]i5ce4 ,! ,xan?ippe is ! woman :o has ! lea/ resemblance to ! hy/]ical type4 ,%e v5ts h] sple5 7:i* is really ! outcome ( unsatisfi$ sexual desires7 on o!rs1 :]eas ! hy/]ical woman visits h]s on h]self4 ,! 8%rew0 dete/s o!r wom51 ! 8s]vant0 dete/s h]self4 ,! drudge weeps out h] woes alone1 )\t really feel+ lonely--lonel9ess is id5tical ) morality1 & a condition :i* implies true duality or manifoldness2 ! %rew hates to be alone because %e mu/ h "s "o to scold1 :il/ hy/]ical wom5 v5t _! passion on !mselves4 ,! %rew lies op5ly & boldly b )\t kn[+ x1 because x is h] nature to ?9k h]self always 9 ! "r1 & %e insults ^? :o contradict h]4 ,! s]vant submits wond]+ly to ! dem&s made ( h] :i* are s =eign to h] nature3 ! hypocrisy ( ?is pliant acquiesc5ce is app>5t 9 h] hy/]ical attacks :5 ! conflict ) h] own sexual emotions beg9s4 ,x is because ( ?is receptivity & susceptibility t hy/]ia & ! hy/]ical type ( woman are s l5i5tly dealt )3 x is ?is type1 & n ! %rewi% type1 t w be cit$ 9 opposition to my views4#bb #bb ,x is ! 8yield+ type0 & n ! virago type ( woman t m5 ?9k capable ( love4 ,su* a woman's love is only ! m5tal s5se ( satisfaction ar\s$ by ! mal5ess ( "s p>ticul> man1 &1 !re=e1 x is only possible ) ! hy/]ical2 x has no?+ to d ) h] individual p[] ( lov+1 & c h no?+ to d ) x4 ,! ba%fulness ( woman is also due to h] 8obsession0 by "o man2 ?is also causes h] neglect ( all o!r m54 ,untru?fulness1 organic untru?fulness1 *>act]ises bo? types1 & accord+ly all wom54 ,x is q wrong to say t wom5 lie4 ,t w\ld imply t !y sometimes speak ! tru?4 ,s9c]ity1 pro =o int]no et ext]no1 is ! virtue ( all o!rs ( :i* wom5 are absolutely incapable1 :i* is impossible = !m6 ,! po9t ,i am urg+ is t woman is nev] g5u9e at any p]iod ( h] life1 n ev5 :5 %e1 9 hy/]ia1 slavi%ly accepts ! aspect ( tru? laid on h] by ano!r1 & app>5tly speaks 9 accordance ) ^? dem&s4 ,a woman c laugh1 cry1 blu%1 or ev5 look wick$ at w3 ! %rew1 :5 %e has "s object 9 view2 ! 8maid10 :5 %e has to make a decision = h]self4 ,m5 h n ! organic & physiological qualifications = su* dissimulation4 ,if we are able to %[ t ! suppos$ love ( tru? 9 ^! types ( woman is no m ?an _! natural hypocrisy 9 a mask1 x is only to be expect$ t all ! o!r qualities = :i* woman has be5 prais$ w suff] "u analysis4 ,h] mode/y1 h] self-respect1 & h] religi\s f]v\r are l\dly acclaim$4 ,womanly mode/y1 none ! less1 is no?+ b prud]y1 i4e41 an extravagant d5ial & rejection ( h] natural immode/y4 ,:5ev] a woman ev9ces any trace ( :at c\ld really be call$ mode/y1 hy/]ia is c]ta9ly answ]able = x4 ,! woman :o is absolutely unhy/]ical & n to be influ5c$1 i4e41 ! absolute %rew1 w n be a%am$ ( any reproa*es h] husb& may %[] on h]1 h[ev] j2 incipi5t hy/]ia is pres5t :5 a woman blu%es "u h] husb&'s direct c5sure2 b hy/]ia 9 its mo/ m>k$ =m is pres5t :5 a woman blu%es :5 %e is q alone3 x is only !n t %e may be said to be fully impregnat$ ) ! mascul9e /&>d ( values4 ,! wom5 :o mo/ ne>ly approximate to :at has be5 call$ sexual an/hesia or frigidity are always hy/]ical1 z ,paul ,solli]s1 ) :om ,i entirely agree1 discov]$4 ,sexual an/hesia is m]ely "o ( ! _m hy/]ical1 t is to say1 unreal1 simulat$ =ms ( an/hesia4 ,osk> ,vogt1 9 p>ticul> 7& g5]al obs]vation has confirm$ him71 prov$ t su* an/hesia does n involve a real lack ( s5sation1 b is simply due to an inhibition :i* keeps c]ta9 s5sations 9 *eck1 & excludes !m f ! consci\sness4 ,if ! an/hetis$ arm ( a hypnotis$ subject is prick$ a c]ta9 numb] ( times1 & ! m$ium is told to say h[ _m times he has be5 prick$1 he is able to d s1 al?\gh o!rwise he w\ld n h p]ceiv$ !m4 ,s also ) sexual frigidity2 x is an ord] giv5 by ! controll+ =ce ( ! sup]-impos$ asexual ideas2 b ?is1 l all o!r =ms ( an/hesia1 c be c\nt]act$ by a suffici5tly /rong 8ord]40 ,! repulsion to sexuality 9 g5]al %[n by ! hy/]ical woman corresponds 9 its nature ) h] ins5sibility to sexual matt]s 9 h] own case4 ,su* a repulsion1 an int5se dis9cl9ation = ev]y?+ sexual1 is really pres5t 9 _m wom51 & ?is may be urg$ z an exception to my g5]alisation z to ! univ]sality 9 woman ( ! mat*-mak+ t5d5cy4 ,b wom5 :o are made ill by discov]+ two p 9 sexual int]c\rse are always hy/]ical4 ,9 ?is we h a special ju/ification ( ! !ory :i* holds mat*-mak+ to be ! true nature ( woman1 & :i* looks ^u h] own sexuality z m]ely a special case ( x4 ,a woman may be made hy/]ical n only by a sexual sugge/ion to h]self :i* %e outw>dly resi/s :il/ inw>dly ass5t+ to x1 b may be j z mu* s by ! sight ( two p 9 sexual int]c\rse1 =1 ?\gh %e ?9ks ! matt] has no value = h]1 h] inborn ass5t to x =ces itself ?r\gh all outw>d & artificial b>ri]s1 & ov]comes ! sup]-impos$ & incorporat$ me?od ( ?\ght 9 :i* %e usually lives4 ,t is to say1 %e feels h]self involv$ 9 ! sexual union ( o!rs4 ,some?+ simil> takes place 9 ! hy/]ical 8consci\sness ( guilt10 :i* has already be5 spok5 ab\t4 ,! absolute %rew nev] feels h]self really 9 ! wrong2 ! woman :o is slightly hy/]ical only feels s 9 ! pres5ce ( m52 ! woman :o is ?or\ghly hy/]ical feels x 9 ! pres5ce ( ! p>ticul> man :o dom9ates h]4 ,"o _c prove ! exi/5ce ( a s5se ( guilt 9 woman by ! mortifications to :i* 8devotees0 & 8p5it5ts0 subject !mselves4 ,x is ^! extreme cases ( self-discipl9e :i* make "o suspici\s4 ,do+ p5ance proves1 9 mo/ cases1 t ! do] has n ov]come 8 fault1 t ! s5se ( guilt has n really ent]$ consci\sness2 x appe>s really to be mu* r an attempt to =ce rep5tance f ! outside1 to make up = n really feel+ x4 ,! diff]5ce betwe5 ! conviction ( guilt 9 hy/]ical wom5 & 9 m51 & ! orig9 ( ! self-reproa*es ( ! =m]1 are ( "s importance4 ,:5 ! hy/]ical woman realises t %e has done or ?\ght some?+ immoral1 %e tries to rectify x by "s code :i* %e seeks to obey & to sub/itute 9 h] m9d 9 place ( ! immoral ?\ght4 ,%e does n really get rid ( ! ?\ght :i* is too deeply root$ 9 h] nature2 %e does n really face x1 try to und]/& x1 & s purge h]self ( x4 ,%e simply1 f po9t to po9t1 case by case1 tries to adh]e to ! moral code )\t ev] trans=m+ h]self1 re=m+ h] idea4 ,! moral "* 9 ! woman is elaborat$ bit by bit2 9 ! male "r conduct comes f moral "*4 ,! v[ remodels ! :ole man2 ! *ange takes place 9 ! only possible way1 f )9 outw>ds1 & leads to a real morality :i* is n only a ju/ification by works4 ,! morality ( ! woman is m]ely sup]ficial & is n real morality4 ,! curr5t op9ion t woman is religi\s is equally errone\s4 ,female my/icism1 :5 x is any?+ m ?an m]e sup]/ition1 is ei!r ?9ly veil$ sexuality 7! id5tification ( ! ,deity & ! lov] has be5 frequ5tly discuss$1 z1 = in/ance1 9 ,maupassant's 8,bel-,ami10 or 9 ,hauptmann's 8,hannele's ,himmelfahrt07 z 9 numb]less spirituali/s & !osophi/s1 or x is a m]e passive & unconsci\s acceptance ( man's religi\s views :i* are clung to ! m firmly because ( woman's natural dis9cl9ation = !m4 ,! lov] is readily trans=m$ into a ,savi\r2 v readily 7z is well kn[n to be ! case ) _m nuns7 ! ,savi\r becomes ! lov]4 ,all ! great wom5 vision>ies kn[n to hi/ory 7 hy/]ical2 ! mo/ fam\s1 ,santa ,t]esa1 0 n misnam$ 8! patron sa9t ( hy/]ia40 ,at any rate1 if woman's religi\sness 7 g5u9e1 & if x proce$$ f h] own nature1 %e w\ld h done some?+ great 9 ! religi\s _w2 b %e nev] has done any?+ ( any importance4 ,i %\ld l to put %ortly :at ,i take to be ! diff]5ce betwe5 ! mascul9e & fem99e cre$s2 man's religion consi/s 9 a supreme belief 9 himself1 woman's 9 a supreme belief 9 o!r p4 ,!re is left to consid] ! self-respect :i* is (t5 describ$ z be+ s highly develop$ 9 ! hy/]ical4 ,t x is only man's self-respect :i* has be5 s ?or\ghly =c$ into woman1 is cle> f its nature & ! way x %[s itself1 z ,vogt1 :o ext5d$ & v]ifi$ exp]im5ts fir/ made by ,freud1 discov]$ f self-respect "u hypnotism4 ,! extrane\s mascul9e w creates by its influ5ce a 8self-respect+0 subject 9 ! hypnotis$ woman by induc+ a limitation ( ! field ( ! unhypnotis$ /ate4 ,ap>t f sugge/ion1 9 ! ord9>y life ( ! hy/]ical x is only ! man ) :om !y are 8impregnat$0 :o is respect$ 9 !m4 ,any k ( human nature :i* wom5 h comes f _! absorption ( ! "r sort ( man4 ,9 ! p>oxysms ( hy/]ia ?is artificial self-respect disappe>s ) ! revolt ( oppress$ nature4 ,?is is q p>allel to ! clairvoyance ( hy/]ical m$iums1 :i* is und\bt$1 b has z little to d ) 8occult0 spiritism z ! ord9>y hypnotic ph5om5a4 ,j z ,vogt's pati5ts made /r5u\s ef=ts to obs]ve !mselves c>efully "u ! p[]ful w ( ! sugge/or1 ! clairvoyante1 "u ! influ5ce ( ! dom9at+ voice ( ! man :o is impos+ 8 w on h]1 is capable ( telepa?ic p]=mances1 & at 8 comm& c1 bl9dfold$1 read communications held by p unkn[n to h] at a great di/ance away2 ?is ,i saw happ5 at ,mn*5 "u circum/ances :i* preclud$ any *ance ( fraud4 ,9 woman !re are n /rong passions oppos$ to ! desire = ! good & true z is ! case ) man4 ,! mascul9e w has m p[] ov] woman ?an ov] ! man himself2 x c realise some?+ 9 wom5 :i*1 9 8 own case1 has to enc\nt] too _m ob/acles4 ,he himself has to battle ) an anti-moral & anti-logical opposition 9 himself4 ,! mascul9e w c obta9 su* p[] ov] woman's m9d t he makes h]1 9 a s5se1 clairvoyant1 & breaks d[n h] limitations ( m5tality4 ,?us x comes ab\t t woman is m telepa?ic ?an man1 c appe> m innoc5t1 & c accompli% m z a 8se]10 & x is only :5 %e becomes a m$ium1 i4e41 ! object1 t %e realises 9 h]self mo/ easily & surely ! mascul9e w = ! good & true4 ,wala c be made to und]/&1 b n until ,dotan subdues h]4 ,%e meets him half-way1 = h] "o desire is to be conqu]$4 ,! subject ( hy/]ia1 s f> z ! purposes ( ?is book are conc]n$1 is n[ exhau/$4 ,! wom5 :o are uni=mly quot$ z pro(s ( female morality are always ( ! hy/]ical type1 & x is ! v obs]vance ( morality1 9 do+ ?+s accord+ to ! moral law z if ?is moral law 7 a law ( _! p]sonality in/ead ( be+ only an acquir$ habit1 t ! unreality1 ! immorality ( ?is morality is %[n4 ,! hy/]ical dia!sis is an absurd imitation ( ! mascul9e m9d1 a p>ody ( free w :i* woman p>ades at ! v mom5t :5 %e is mo/ "u a mascul9e influ5ce4 ,woman is n a free ag5t2 %e is altoge!r subject to h] desire to be "u man's influ5ce1 h]self & all o!rs3 %e is "u ! sway ( ! phallus1 & irretrievably succumbs to h] de/9y1 ev5 if x leads to actively develop$ sexuality4 ,at ! mo/ a woman c rea* an indi/9ct feel+ ( h] un-fre$om1 a cl\dy idea ( ! possibility ( controll+ h] de/9y--manife/ly only a flick]+ sp>k ( ! free1 intelligible subject1 ! scanty rema9s ( inh]it$ mal5ess 9 h]1 :i*1 by contra/1 gives h] ev5 ?is slight compreh5sion4 ,x is also impossible = a woman to h a cle> idea ( h] de/9y1 or ( ! =ces )9 h]3 x is only he :o is free :o c disc]n fate1 because he is n *a9$ by necessity2 "p ( 8 p]sonality1 at lea/1 places him 9 ! position ( spectator & a combatant outside 8 own fate & makes him s f> sup]ior to x4 ,"o ( ! mo/ conclusive pro(s ( human fre$om is conta9$ 9 ! fact t man has be5 able to create ! idea ( causality4 ,wom5 consid] !mselves mo/ free :5 !y are mo/ b\nd2 & !y are n tr\bl$ by ! passions1 because !y are simply ! embodim5t ( !m4 ,x is only a man :o c talk ( ! 8dira necessitas0 )9 him2 x is only he c\ld h creat$ ! idea ( de/9y1 because x is only he :o1 9 addition to ! empirical1 condition$ exi/5ce1 possesses a free1 intelligible ego4 ,z ,i h %[n1 woman c rea* no m ?an a vague half-consci\sness ( ! fact t %e is a condition$ be+1 & s %e is unable to ov]come ! sexuality t b9ds h]4 ,hy/]ia is ! only attempt on h] "p to ov]come x1 &1 z ,i h %[n1 x is n a g5u9e attempt4 ,! hy/]ia itself is :at ! hy/]ical woman tries to resi/1 & ! falsity ( ?is ef=t aga9/ slav]y is ! measure ( its hopelessness4 ,! mo/ notable examples ( ! sex 7,i h 9 m9d ,hebbel's ,judi? & ,wagn]'s ,kundry7 may feel t is because !y wi% x t s]vitude is a necessity = !m1 b ?is realisation does n give !m p[] to resi/ x2 at ! la/ mom5t !y w kiss ! man :o ravi%es !m1 & succumb ) pleasure to ^? :om !y h be5 resi/+ viol5tly4 ,x is z if woman 7 "u a curse4 ,at times %e feels ! weight ( x1 b %e nev] flees f x4 ,h] %rieks & rav+s are n really g5u9e1 & %e succumbs to h] fate at ! mom5t :5 x has seem$ mo/ repulsive to h]4 ,aft] a long analysis1 !n1 x has be5 f\nd t !re is no exception to ! complete abs5ce 9 wom5 ( any true1 inali5able relation to wor?4 ,ev5 :at is cov]$ by su* curr5t t]ms z 8womanly love10 8womanly virtue10 8womanly dev\tness10 8womanly mode/y10 has fail$ to invalidate my conclusions4 ,i h ma9ta9$ my gr\nd 9 face ( ! /ronge/ opposition1 ev5 includ+ t :i* comes f woman's hy/]ical imitations ( ! male morality4 ,woman1 ! normal receptive woman ( :om ,i am speak+1 is impregnat$ by ! man n only physically 7& ,i set d[n ! a/oni%+ m5tal alt]ation 9 wom5 aft] m>riage to a physical ph5om5on ak9 to telegony71 b at e age ( h] life1 by man's consci\sness & by man's social arrangem5ts4 ,?us x comes ab\t t al?\gh woman lacks all ! *>act]s ( ! male sex1 %e c assume !m s clev]ly & s slavi%ly t x is possible to make mi/akes su* z ! idea ( ! high] morality ( wom54 ,b ?is a/\nd+ receptivity ( woman is n isolat$1 & mu/ be br\ght into practical & !oretical connection ) ! o!r positive & negative *>act]i/ics ( woman4 ,:at has ! mat*-mak+ in/9ct 9 woman to d ) h] pla/icity8 ,:at connection is !re betwe5 h] untru?fulness & h] sexuality8 ,h[ does x come ab\t t !re is su* a /range mixture ( all ^! ?+s 9 woman8 ,?is br+s u to ask ! reason :y wom5 c assimilate ev]y?+4 ,:5ce does %e d]ive ! falsity :i* makes x possible = h] to pref] to believe only :at o!rs h told h]1 to h only :at !y 7*oose to7 give h]1 to be m]ely :at !y make h]8 ,9 ord] to give ! "r answ] to ^! que/ions we mu/ turn once m1 = ! la/ "t1 f ! actual po9t4 ,x 0 f\nd t ! p[] ( recognition :i* animals possess1 & :i* is ! psy*ical equival5t ( univ]sal organic response to repeat$ /imuli1 0 curi\sly l & unlike human memory2 bo? signify an equally la/+ influ5ce ( an impression :i* 0 limit$ to a def9ite p]iod2 b memory is diff]5tiat$ f m]e passive recognition by its p[] ( actively reproduc+ ! pa/4 ,lat] on1 x 0 se5 t m]e individuation1 ! *>act]i/ic ( all organic diff]5tiation1 & individuality1 man's possession1 are diff]5t4 ,& f9ally x 0 f\nd t x 0 necess>y to di/+ui% c>efully betwe5 love1 peculi> to man1 & ! sexual in/9ct1 %>$ by ! animals4 ,! two are alli$ inasmu* z !y are bo? ef=ts at immortality4 ,! desire = wor? 0 ref]r$ to z a human "*1 abs5t 9 ! animals :]e !re is only a desire = satisfaction4 ,! two are analog\s1 & yet fundam5tally diff]5t4 ,pleasure is crav$2 wor? is :at we feel we ought to crave4 ,! two h be5 confus$1 ) ! wor/ results = psy*ology & e?ics4 ,!re has be5 a simil> confusion betwe5 p]sonality & p]sons1 betwe5 recognition & memory1 sexuality & love4 ,all ^! anti!ses h be5 cont9ually confus$1 &1 :at is ev5 m /rik+1 almo/ always by m5 ) ! same views & !ories1 & ) ! same object--t ( try+ to oblit]ate ! diff]5ce betwe5 man & ! l[] animals4 ,!re are o!r less kn[n di/9ctions :i* h be5 equally neglect$4 ,limit$ consci\sness is an animal trait2 ! active p[] ( notic+ is a purely human "o4 ,x is evid5t t !re is some?+ 9 common 9 ! two facts1 b /ill !y are v diff]5t4 ,desire1 or impulse1 & w are ne>ly always spok5 ( z if !y 7 id5tical4 ,! =m] is common to all liv+ creatures1 b man has1 9 addition1 a w1 :i* is free1 & no factor ( psy*ology1 because x is ! f\ndation ( all psy*ological exp]i5ces4 ,! id5tification ( impulse & w is n solely due to ,d>w92 x occurr$ also 9 ,s*op5hau]'s conception ( ! w1 :i* 0 sometimes biological1 sometimes purely philosophical4 ,i may gr\p ! two sets ( factors z foll[s3 ,common to m5 & animals1 ,limit$ to mank9d1 & 9 fundam5tally organic4 p>ticul> to ! males ( mank9d4 ,individuation4 ,individuality4 ,recognition4 ,memory4 ,pleasure4 ,s5se ( wor? or value4 ,sexual desire4 ,love4 ,limitation ( ! field ( ,faculty ( 8tak+ consci\sness4 notice40 ,impulse4 ,w4 ,! s]ies %[s t man possesses n only ea* "* :i* is f\nd 9 all liv+ ?+s1 b also an analog\s & high] "* peculi> to himself4 ,! old t5d5cy at once to id5tify ! two s]ies & to contra/ !m seems to %[ ! exi/5ce ( some?+ b9d+ toge!r ! two s]ies1 & at ! same "t sep>at+ !m4 ,"o may recall 9 ?is connection ! ,buddhi/ic conception ( !re be+ 9 man a sup]/ructure add$ to ! *>act]s ( l[] exi/5ces4 ,x is z if man possess$ all ! prop]ties ( ! bea/s1 )1 9 ea* case1 "s special quality add$4 ,:at is ?is t has be5 add$8 ,h[ f> does x resemble1 & 9 :at respects does x diff] f1 ! m primitive set8 ,! t]ms 9 ! left-h& r[ are fundam5tal *>act]i/ics ( all animal & vegetable life4 ,all su* life is individual life1 n ! life ( undivid$ masses2 x manife/s itself z ! impulse to satisfy ne$s1 z sexual impulse = ! purpose ( reproduction4 ,individuality1 memory1 w1 love1 are ^? qualities ( a second life1 :i*1 al?\gh relat$ to organic life to a c]ta9 ext5t1 are toto clo diff]5t f x4 ,?is br+s u face to face ) ! religi\s idea ( ! et]nal1 high]1 new life1 & especially ) ! ,*ri/ian =m ( x4 ,z well z a %>e 9 organic life1 man %>es ano!r life1 ! ( ! ,new ,disp5sation4 ,j z all e>?ly life is su/a9$ by e>?ly food1 ?is o!r life requires spiritual su/5ance 7symbolis$ 9 ! communion s]vice74 ,! bir? & dea? ( ! =m] h _! c\nt]p>ts 9 ! latt]--! moral re-bir? ( man1 ! 8reg5]ation0--& ! end3 ! f9al loss ( ! s\l ?r\gh error or crime4 ,! "o is det]m9$ f )\t by ! bonds ( natural causation2 ! o!r is rul$ by ! moral imp]ative f )94 ,! "o is limit$ & conf9$ to a def9ite purpose2 ! o!r is unlimit$1 et]nal & moral4 ,! *>act]s :i* are 9 ! left r[ are common to all =ms ( l[] life2 ^? 9 ! "r-h& column are ! correspond+ presages ( et]nal life1 manife/ations ( a high] exi/5ce 9 :i* man1 & only man1 has a %>e4 ,! p]petual int]m+l+ & ! fre% complications :i* arise betwe5 ! high] & l[] natures are ! mak+ ( all hi/ory ( ! human m9d2 ?is is ! plot ( ! hi/ory ( ! univ]se4 ,x is possible t "s may p]ceive 9 ?is second life some?+ :i* 9 man might h be5 d]iv$ f ! o!r l[] *>act]s2 su* a possibility dismiss at once4 ,a cle>] grasp ( ?is s5su\s1 impressionable l[] life w make x cle> t1 z ,i h expla9$ 9 e>li] *apt]s1 ! case is rev]s$2 ! l[] life is m]ely a projection ( ! high] on ! _w ( ! s5ses1 a reflection ( x 9 ! sph]e ( necessity1 z a degradation ( x1 or its ,fall4 ,& ! great problem is h[ ! et]nal1 l(ty idea came to be b\nd ) e>?4 ,?is problem is ! guilt ( ! _w4 ,my inve/igation is n[ on ! ?re%old ( :at _c be inve/igat$2 ( a problem t s f> no "o has d>$ to answ]1 & t nev] w be answ]$ by any human be+4 ,x is ! riddle ( ! univ]se & ( life2 ! b9d+ ( ! unlimit$ 9 ! bonds ( space1 ( ! et]nal 9 "t1 ( ! _s 9 matt]4 ,x is ! relation ( fre$om to necessity1 ( some?+ to no?+1 ( ,god to ! devil4 ,! dualism ( ! _w is beyond compreh5sion2 x is ! plot ( ! /ory ( man's ,fall1 ! primitive riddle4 ,x is ! b9d+ ( et]nal life 9 a p]i%able be+1 ( ! innoc5t 9 ! guilty4 ,b x is evid5t t nei!r ,i nor any o!r man c und]/& ?is4 ,i c und]/& s9 only :5 ,i cease to commit x1 & ! mom5t ,i und]/& x ,i cease to commit x4 ,s also ,i c nev] compreh5d life :ile ,i am /ill alive4 ,!re is no mom5t ( my life :5 ,i am n b\nd d[n by ?is %am exi/5ce1 & x mu/ be impossible = me to und]/& ! bond until ,i am free f x4 ,:5 ,i und]/& a ?+ ,i am already outside x2 ,i _c compreh5d my s9fulness :ile ,i am /ill s9ful4 ,z ! absolute female has no trace ( individuality & w1 no s5se ( wor? or ( love1 %e c h no "p 9 ! high]1 transc5d5tal life4 ,! intelligible1 hyp]empirical exi/5ce ( ! male transc5ds matt]1 space1 & "t4 ,he is c]ta9ly mortal1 b he is immortal z well4 ,& s he has ! p[] to *oose betwe5 ! two1 betwe5 ! life :i* is lo/ ) dea? & ! life to :i* dea? is only a /epp+-/one4 ,! deepe/ w ( man is t[>ds ?is p]fect1 timeless exi/5ce2 he is compact ( ! desire = immortality4 ,t ! woman has no crav+ = p]petual life is too app>5t2 !re is no?+ 9 h] ( t et]nal :i* man tries to int]pose & mu/ int]pose betwe5 8 real self & 8 project$1 empirical self4 ,"s sort ( relation to ! idea ( supreme value1 to ! idea ( ! absolute1 t p]fect fre$om :i* he has n yet atta9$1 because he is b\nd by necessity1 b :i* he c atta9 because m9d is sup]ior to matt]2 su* a relation to ! purpose ( ?+s g5]ally1 or to ! div9e1 e man has4 ,& al?\gh 8 life on e>? is accompani$ by sep>ation & deta*m5t f ! absolute1 8 m9d is always long+ to be free f ! ta9t ( orig9al s94 ,j z ! love ( 8 p>5ts 0 n pure 9 purpose1 b s\ght m or less a physical embodim5t1 ! son1 :o is ! outcome ( t love1 w possess 8 %>e ( mortal life z well z ( et]nal3 we are horrifi$ at ! ?\ght ( dea?1 we fight aga9/ x1 cl+ to ?is mortal life1 & prove f t t we 7 anxi\s to be born z we 7 born1 & t we /ill desire to be born ( ?is _w4 ,b s9ce e male has a relation to ! idea ( ! highe/ value1 & w\ld be incomplete )\t x1 no male is really ev] happy4 ,x is only wom5 :o are happy4 ,no man is happy1 because he has a relation to fre$om1 & yet dur+ 8 e>?ly life he is always b\nd 9 "s way4 ,none b a p]fectly passive be+1 su* z ! absolute female1 or a univ]sally active be+1 l ! div9e1 c be happy4 ,happ9ess is ! s5se ( p]fect consummation1 & ?is feel+ a man c nev] h2 b !re are wom5 :o fancy !mselves p]fect4 ,! male always has problems beh9d him & ef=ts be=e him3 all problems orig9ate 9 ! pa/2 ! future is ! sph]e = ef=ts4 ,"t has no objective1 no mean+1 = woman2 no woman que/ions h]self z to ! reason ( h] exi/5ce2 & yet ! sole purpose ( "t is to give expression to ! fact t ?is life c & mu/ mean some?+4 ,happ9ess = ! male6 ,t w\ld imply :olly indep5d5t activity1 complete fre$om2 he is always b\nd1 al?\gh n ) ! heavie/ bonds1 & 8 s5se ( guilt increases ! fur!r he is remov$ f ! idea ( fre$om4 ,mortal life is a calamity1 & mu/ rema9 s :il/ mank9d is a passive victim ( s5sation2 s long z he rema9s n =m1 b m]ely ! matt] on :i* =m is impress$4 ,e man1 h[ev]1 has "s glimm] ( high] ?+s2 ! g5ius mo/ c]ta9ly & mo/ directly4 ,?is trace ( light1 h[ev]1 does n come f 8 p]ceptions2 s f> z he is rul$ by ^!1 man is m]ely a passive victim ( surr\nd+ ?+s4 ,8 spontaneity1 8 fre$om1 come f 8 p[] ( judg+ z to values1 & 8 highe/ approa* to absolute spontaneity & fre$om comes f love & f arti/ic or philosophical creation4 ,?r\gh ^! he obta9s "s fa9t s5se ( :at happ9ess might be4 ,woman c really nev] be q unhappy1 = happ9ess is an empty ^w = h]1 a ^w creat$ by unhappy m54 ,wom5 nev] m9d lett+ o!rs see _! unhapp9ess1 z x is n real2 beh9d x !re lies no consci\sness ( guilt1 no s5se ( ! s9 ( ! _w4 ,! la/ & absolute pro( ( ! ?or\ghly negative "* ( woman's life1 ( h] complete want ( a high] exi/5ce1 is d]iv$ f ! way 9 :i* wom5 commit suicide4 ,su* suicides are accompani$ practically always by ?\ghts ( o!r p1 :at !y w ?9k1 h[ !y w m\rn ov] !m1 h[ griev$--or angry--!y w be4 ,e woman is conv9c$ t h] unhapp9ess is undes]v$ at ! "t %e kills h]self2 %e pities h]self exce$+ly ) ! sort ( self-compassion :i* is only a 8weep+ ) o!rs :5 !y weep40 ,h[ is x possible = a woman to look ^u h] unhapp9ess z p]sonal :5 %e possesses no idea ( a de/9y8 ,! mo/ appall+ly decisive pro( ( ! empt9ess & nullity ( wom5 is t !y nev] once succe$ 9 kn[+ ! problem ( _! own lives1 & dea? leaves !m ignorant ( x1 because !y are unable to realise ! high] life ( p]sonality4 ,i am n[ ready to answ] ! "q :i* ,i put =w>d z ! *ief object ( ?is portion ( my book1 ! "q z to ! significance ( ! male & female 9 ! univ]se4 ,wom5 h no exi/5ce & no ess5ce2 !y are n1 !y are no?+4 ,mank9d occurs z male or female1 z some?+ or no?+4 ,woman has no %>e 9 ontological reality1 no relation to ! ?+-9-itself1 :i*1 9 ! deepe/ int]pretation1 is ! absolute1 is ,god4 ,man 9 8 highe/ =m1 ! g5ius1 has su* a relation1 & = him ! absolute is ei!r ! conception ( ! highe/ wor? ( exi/5ce1 9 :i* case he is a philosoph]2 or x is ! wond]ful fairyl& ( dreams1 ! k+dom ( absolute beauty1 & !n he is an arti/4 ,b bo? views mean ! same4 ,woman has no relation to ! idea1 %e nei!r affirms nor d5ies x2 %e is nei!r moral nor anti-moral2 ma!matically speak+1 %e has no sign2 %e is purposeless1 nei!r good nor bad1 nei!r angel nor devil1 nev] egoi/ical 7& !re=e has (t5 be5 said to be altrui/ic72 %e is z non-moral z %e is non-logical4 ,b all exi/5ce is moral & logical exi/5ce4 ,s woman has no exi/5ce4 ,woman is untru?ful4 ,an animal has j z little metaphysical reality z ! actual woman1 b x _c speak1 & consequ5tly x does n lie4 ,9 ord] to speak ! tru? "o mu/ be some?+2 tru? is dep5d5t on an exi/5ce1 & only t c h a relation to an exi/5ce :i* is 9 itself some?+4 ,man desires tru? all ! "t2 t is to say1 he all along desires only to be some?+4 ,! cognition-impulse is 9 ! end id5tical ) ! desire = immortality4 ,any "o :o objects to a /atem5t )\t ev] hav+ realis$ x2 any "o :o gives outw>d acquiesc5ce )\t ! inn] affirmation1 su* p]sons1 l woman1 h no real exi/5ce & mu/ ( necessity lie4 ,s t woman always lies1 ev5 if1 objectively1 %e speaks ! tru?4 ,woman is ! great emiss>y ( pair+4 ,! liv+ units ( ! l[] =ms ( life are individuals1 organisms2 ! liv+ units ( ! high] =ms ( life are individualities1 s\ls1 monads1 8meta-organisms10 a t]m :i* ,hell5ba* uses & :i* is n )\t po9t4 ,ea* monad1 h[ev]1 is diff]5tiat$ f e o!r monad1 & is z di/9ct f x z only two ?+s c be4 ,monads h no w9d[s1 b1 in/ead1 h ! univ]se 9 !mselves4 ,man z monad1 z a pot5tial or actual individuality1 t is1 z hav+ g5ius1 has 9 addition diff]5tiation & di/9ction1 individuation & discrim9ation2 ! simple undiff]5tiat$ unit is exclusively female4 ,ea* monad creates = itself a deta*$ entity1 a :ole2 b x looks ^u e o!r ego z a p]fect totality also1 & nev] intrudes ^u x4 ,man has limits1 & accepts !m & desires !m2 woman1 :o does n recognise h] own entity1 is n 9 a position to reg>d or p]ceive ! privacy ( ^? ar\nd h]1 & nei!r respects1 nor hon\rs1 nor leaves x alone3 z !re is no su* ?+ z "o-ness = h] !re c be no plurality1 only an indi/9ct /ate ( fusion ) o!rs4 ,because !re is no 8,i0 9 woman %e _c grasp ! 8?\02 accord+ to h] p]ception ! ,i & ?\ are j a pair1 an undiff]5tiat$ "o2 ?is makes x possible = woman to br+ p toge!r1 to mat*-make4 ,! object ( h] love is t ( h] sympa?y--! community1 ! bl5d+ ( ev]y?+4#bc #bc ,all individuality is an enemy ( ! community4 ,?is is se5 mo/ m>k$ly 9 m5 ( g5ius1 b x is j ! same ) reg>d to ! sexes4 ,woman has no limits to h] ego :i* c\ld be brok5 ?r\gh1 & :i* %e w\ld h to gu>d4 ,! *ief diff]5ce betwe5 man's & woman's fri5d%ip is ref]able to ?is fact4 ,man's fri5d%ip is an attempt to see eye to eye ) ^? :o individually & collectively are /riv+ aft] ! same idea2 woman's fri5d%ip is a comb9ation = ! purpose ( mat*-mak+4 ,x is ! only k9d ( intimate & unres]v$ int]c\rse possible betwe5 wom51 :5 !y are n m]ely anxi\s to meet ea* o!r = ! purpose ( gossip+ or discuss+ e day affairs4#bd #bd ,m5's fri5d%ips avoid break+ d[n _! fri5ds' p]sonal res]ve4 ,wom5 expect intimacy f _! fri5ds4 ,if1 = in/ance1 "o ( two girls or wom5 is mu* pretti] ?an ! o!r1 ! pla9] ( ! two exp]i5ces a c]ta9 sexual satisfaction at ! admiration :i* ! o!r receives4 ,! pr9cipal condition ( all fri5d%ip betwe5 wom5 is ! exclusion ( rivalry2 e woman comp>es h]self physically ) e woman %e gets to "k4 ,9 cases :]e "o is m beautiful ?an ! o!r1 ! pla9] ( ! two w idolise ! o!r1 because1 ?\gh nei!r ( !m is 9 ! lea/ consci\s ( x1 ! next be/ ?+ to h] own sexual satisfaction = ! "o is ! success ( ! o!r2 x is always ! same2 woman p>ticipates 9 e sexual union4 ,! completely imp]sonal exi/5ce ( wom51 z well z ! sup]-individual nature ( _! sexuality1 cle>ly %[s mat*-mak+ to be ! fundam5tal trait ( _! be+s4 ,! lea/ t ev5 ! uglie/ woman dem&s1 & f :i* %e d]ives a c]ta9 am\nt ( pleasure1 is t any "o ( h] sex %\ld be admir$ & desir$4 ,x foll[s f ! absorb+ & absorbable nature ( woman's life t wom5 c nev] feel really jeal\s4 ,h[ev] ignoble jeal\sy & ! _s ( rev5ge may be1 !y bo? conta9 an elem5t ( greatness1 ( :i* wom51 :e!r = good or evil1 are incapable4 ,9 jeal\sy !re lies a despair+ claim to an assum$ "r1 & ! idea ( ju/ice is out ( woman's rea*4 ,b t is n ! *ief reason :y a woman c nev] be really jeal\s ( any man4 ,if a man1 ev5 if he 7 ! man %e 0 madly 9 love )1 7 sitt+ 9 ! next room mak+ love to ano!r woman1 ! ?\ghts t w\ld be ar\s$ 9 h] brea/ w\ld be s sexually excit+ t !y w\ld leave no room = jeal\sy4 ,to a man1 su* a sc5e1 if he knew ( x1 w\ld be absolutely repulsive1 & x w\ld be nause\s to him to be ne> x2 woman w\ld fev]i%ly foll[ ea* detail1 or %e w\ld become hy/]ical if x dawn$ on h] :at %e 0 do+4 ,a man is nev] really affect$ by ! idea ( ! pair+ ( o!rs3 he is outside & above any su* circum/ance :i* has no mean+ = him2 a woman1 h[ev]1 w\ld be sc>cely responsible = h] int]e/ 9 ! process1 %e w\ld be 9 a /ate ( fev]i% excitem5t & z if spellb\nd by ! ?\ght ( h] proximity to x4 ,a man's int]e/ 9 8 fell[ m51 :o are problems = him1 may ext5d to _! sexual affairs2 b ! curiosity :i* is specially = ^! ?+s is peculi> to woman1 :e!r ) reg>d to m5 or wom54 ,x is ! love affairs ( a man :i*1 f fir/ to la/1 int]e/ wom52 & a man is only intellectually my/]i\s & *>m+ to a woman s long z %e is n cle> z to ^!4 ,f all ?is x is aga9 manife/ t femal5ess & mat*-mak+ are id5tical2 ev5 a sup]ficial /udy ( ! case w\ld h result$ 9 ! same conclusions4 ,b ,i _h a mu* wid] purpose1 & ,i hope ,i h cle>ly %[n ! connection betwe5 woman positive z mat*-mak]1 & woman negative z utt]ly lack+ 9 ! high] life4 ,woman has b "o idea1 an idea %e _c be consci\s (1 z x is h] sole idea1 & t is absolutely oppos$ to ! spiritual idea4 ,:e!r z a "m seek+ reputable matrimony1 or ! ,bac*ante ( ! ,v5usb]g1 :e!r %e wi%es to be ! f\ndress ( a family1 or is cont5t to be lo/ 9 ! maze ( pleasure-seek]s1 %e always is 9 relation to ! g5]al idea ( ! race z a :ole ( :i* %e is an insep>able "p1 & %e foll[s ! in/9ct :i* mo/ ( all makes = community4 ,%e1 z ! mission>y ( union1 mu/ be a creature )\t limits or individuality4 ,i h prolong$ ?is side ( my inve/igation because its important result has be5 omitt$ f all e>li] *>act]ology4 ,at ?is /age x well may be ask$ if wom5 are really to be consid]$ human be+s at all1 or if my !ory does n unite !m ) plants & animals8 ,=1 accord+ to ! !ory1 wom51 j z little z plants & animals1 h any real exi/5ce1 any relation to ! intelligible :ole4 ,man alone is a microcosm1 a mirror ( ! univ]se4 ,9 ,ibs5's 8,little ,eyolf0 !re is a beautiful & apposite passage4 8,rita4 #8,aft] all1 we are only human be+s4' 8,allm]s4 #8,b we h "s k9%ip ) ! sky & ! sea1 ,rita4' 8,rita4 #8,y1 p]haps2 n me4'0 ,woman1 accord+ to ! poet1 accord+ to ,buddha1 & 9 my int]pretation1 has no relation to ! all1 to ! _w :ole1 to ,god4 ,is %e !n human1 or an animal1 or a plant8 ,anatomi/s w f9d ! "q ridicul\s1 & w at once dismiss ! philosophy :i* c\ld lead up to su* a possibility4 ,= !m woman is ! female ( ,homo sapi5s1 diff]5tiat$ f all o!r liv+ be+s1 & occupy+ ! same position ) reg>d to ! human male t ! females ( o!r species occupy ) reg>d to _! males4 ,& he w n all[ ! philosoph] to say1 8,:at has ! anatomi/ to d ) me8 ,let him m9d 8 own bus9ess40 ,z a matt] ( fact1 wom5 are si/]s ( ! fl[]s1 & are 9 close relation%ip ) ! animals4 ,_m ( _! sexual p]v]sities & affections = animals 7,pasiphe my? & ,l$a my?7 indicate ?is4 ,b !y are human be+s4 ,ev5 ! absolute woman1 :om we ?9k ( z )\t any trace ( intelligible ego1 is /ill ! complem5t ( man4 ,& !re is no d\bt t ! fact ( ! special sexual & erotic completion ( ! human male by ! human female1 ev5 if x is n ! moral ph5om5on :i* advocates ( m>riage w\ld h u believe1 is /ill ( trem5d\s importance to ! woman problem4 ,animals are m]e individuals2 wom5 are p]sons1 al?\gh !y are n p]sonalities4 ,an appe>ance ( discrim9ative p[]1 ?\gh n ! reality1 language1 ?\gh n conv]sation1 memory1 ?\gh x has no cont9uity or unity ( consci\sness--mu/ all be grant$ to !m4 ,!y possess c\nt]feits ( ev]y?+ mascul9e1 & ?us are subject to ^? trans=mations :i* ! def5d]s ( womanl9ess are s fond ( quot+4 ,! result ( ?is is a sort ( amphi-sexuality ( _m ideas 7hon\r1 %ame1 love1 imag9ation1 fe>1 s5sibility1 & s on71 :i* h bo? a mascul9e & fem99e significance4 ,!re n[ rema9s to discuss ! real mean+ ( ! contra/ betwe5 ! sexes4 ,! p>ts play$ by ! male & female pr9ciples 9 ! animal & vegetable k+doms are n n[ "u consid]ation2 we are deal+ solely ) humanity4 ,t su* pr9ciples ( mal5ess & femal5ess mu/ be accept$ z !oretical conceptions1 & n z metaphysical ideas1 0 ! po9t ( ?is inve/igation f ! beg9n+4 ,! :ole object ( ! book has be5 to settle ! "q1 9 man at lea/1 ( ! really important diff]5ces betwe5 man & woman1 q ap>t f ! m]e physiological-sexual diff]5tiation4 ,fur!rmore1 ! view :i* sees no?+ m 9 ! fact ( ! dualism ( ! sexes ?an an arrangem5t = physiological division ( lab\r--an idea = :i*1 ,i believe1 ! zoologi/1 ,milne-,edw>ds1 is responsible--appe>s1 accord+ to ?is "w1 q unt5able2 & x is useless to wa/e "t discuss+ su* a sup]ficial & intellectually complac5t view4 ,d>w9ism1 inde$1 is responsible = mak+ popul> ! view t sexually diff]5tiat$ organisms h be5 d]iv$ f e>li] /ages 9 :i* !re 0 no sexual dimorphism2 b long be=e ,d>w91 ,gu/av ,!odor ,fe*n] _h already %[n t ! sexes c\ld n be suppos$ to h aris5 f an undiff]5tiat$ /age by any pr9ciple su* z division ( lab\r1 adaptation to ! /ruggle = exi/5ce1 & s =?4 ,! ideas 8man0 & 8woman0 _c be inve/igat$ sep>ately2 _! significance c be f\nd out only by plac+ !m side by side & contra/+ !m4 ,! key to _! natures mu/ be f\nd 9 _! relations to ea* o!r4 ,9 attempt+ to discov] ! nature ( erotics ,i w5t a little way into ?is subject4 ,! relation ( man to woman is simply t ( subject to object4 ,woman seeks h] consummation z ! object4 ,%e is ! play?+ ( husb& or *ild1 &1 h[ev] we may try to hide x1 %e is anxi\s to be no?+ b su* a *attel4 ,no "o misund]/&s s ?or\ghly :at a woman wants z he :o tries to f9d out :at is pass+ )9 h]1 endeav\r+ to %>e h] feel+s & hopes1 h] exp]i5ces & h] real nature4 ,woman does n wi% to be treat$ z an active ag5t2 %e wants to rema9 always & ?r\gh\t--?is is j h] womanhood--purely passive1 to feel h]self "u ano!r's w4 ,%e dem&s only to be desir$ physically1 to be tak5 possession (1 l a new prop]ty4 ,j z m]e s5sation only atta9s reality :5 x is appreh5d$1 i4e41 :5 x becomes objective1 s a woman is br\ght to a s5se ( h] exi/5ce only by h] husb& or *ildr5--by ^! z subjects to :om %e is ! object--s obta9+ ! gift ( an exi/5ce4 ,! contra/ betwe5 ! subject & ! object 9 ! !ory ( k corresponds ontologically to ! contra/ betwe5 =m & matt]4 ,x is no m ?an a translation ( ?is di/9ction f ! !ory ( exp]i5ce to metaphysics4 ,matt]1 :i* 9 itself is absolutely un9dividualis$ & s c assume any =m1 ( itself has no def9ite & la/+ qualities1 & has z little ess5ce z m]e p]ception1 ! matt] ( exp]i5ce1 has 9 itself any exi/5ce4 ,if ! ,platonic conception is foll[$ out1 x w be app>5t t t great ?9k] ass]t$ to be no?+ :at ! ord9>y ,phili/9e reg>ds z ! highe/ =m ( reality4 ,accord+ to ,plato1 ! negation ( exi/5ce is no o!r ?an matt]4 ,=m is ! only real exi/5ce4 ,ari/otle c>ri$ ! ,platonic conception into ! regions ( biology4 ,= ,plato =m is ! p>5t & creator ( all reality4 ,= ,ari/otle1 9 ! sexual process ! male pr9ciple is ! active1 =mative ag5t1 ! female pr9ciple ! passive matt] on :i* ! =m is impress$4 ,9 my view1 ! significance ( woman 9 humanity is expla9$ by ! ,platonic & ,ari/otelian conception4 ,woman is ! mat]ial on :i* man acts4 ,man z ! microcosm is comp\nd$ ( ! l[] & high] life4 ,woman is matt]1 is no?+4 ,?is k gives u ! key/one to our /ructure1 & x makes ev]y?+ cle> t 0 indi/9ct1 x gives ?+s a coh]5t =m4 ,woman's sexual "p dep5ds on contact2 x is ! absorb+ & n ! lib]at+ impulse4 ,x co9cides ) ?is1 t ! ke5e/ s5se woman has1 & ! only "o %e has m highly develop$ ?an man1 is ! s5se ( t\*4 ,! eye & ! e> lead to ! unlimit$ & give glimpses ( inf9ity2 ! s5se ( t\* necessitates physical limitations to our own actions3 "o is affect$ by :at "o feels2 x is ! em95tly sordid s5se1 & suit$ to ! physical requirem5ts ( an e>?-b\nd be+4 ,man is =m1 woman is matt]3 if t is s x mu/ f9d expression 9 ! relations betwe5 _! respective psy*ic exp]i5ces4 ,! summ+ up ( ! connect$ nature ( man's m5tal life1 z oppos$ to ! in>ticulate & *aotic condition ( woman's1 illu/rates ! above anti!sis ( =m & matt]4 ,matt] ne$s to be =m$3 & ?us woman dem&s t man %\ld cle> h] confusion ( ?\ght1 give mean+ to h] h5id ideas4 ,wom5 are matt]1 :i* c assume any %ape4 ,^? exp]im5ts :i* ascribe to girls a bett] memory = le>n+ by rote ?an boys are expla9$ 9 ?is way3 !y are due to ! nullity & inanity ( wom51 :o c be saturat$ ) any?+ & ev]y?+1 :il/ man only reta9s :at has an int]e/ = him1 =gett+ all else4 ,?is acc\nts = :at has be5 call$ woman's submissiv5ess1 ! way %e is influ5c$ by ! op9ions ( o!rs1 h] sugge/ibility1 ! way 9 :i* man m\lds h] =mless nature4 ,woman is no?+2 !re=e1 & only !re=e1 %e c become ev]y?+1 :il/ man c only rema9 :at he is4 ,a man c make :at he likes ( a woman3 ! mo/ a woman c d is to help a man to a*ieve :at he wants4 ,a man's real nature is nev] alt]$ by education3 woman1 on ! o!r h&1 by ext]nal influ5ces1 c be taught to suppress h] mo/ *>act]i/ic self1 ! real value %e sets on sexuality4 ,woman c appe> ev]y?+ & d5y ev]y?+1 b 9 reality %e is nev] any?+4 ,wom5 h nei!r ?is nor t *>act]i/ic2 _! peculi>ity consi/s 9 hav+ no *>act]i/ics at all2 ! complexity & t]rible my/]y ab\t wom5 come to ?is2 x is ?is :i* makes !m above & beyond man's und]/&+--man1 :o always wants to get to ! he>t ( ?+s4 ,x may be said1 ev5 by ^? :o may wi% to agree ) ! =ego+ argum5ts1 t !y h n indicat$ :at man really is4 ,has he any special male *>act]i/ics1 l mat*-mak+ & want ( "* 9 wom58 ,is !re a def9ite idea ( :at man is1 z !re is ( woman1 & c ?is idea be simil>ly =mulat$8 ,"h is ! answ]3 ,! idea ( mal5ess consi/s 9 ! fact ( an individuality1 ( an ess5tial monad1 & is cov]$ by x4 ,ea* monad1 h[ev]1 is z diff]5t z possible f e o!r monad1 & !re=e _c be classifi$ 9 "o compreh5sive idea common to _m o!r monads4 ,man is ! microcosm2 he conta9s all k9ds ( possibilities4 ,?is mu/ n be confus$ ) ! univ]sal susceptibility ( woman :o becomes all )\t be+ any?+1 :il/ man is all1 z mu* or z little1 accord+ to 8 gifts1 z he w4 ,man conta9s woman1 = he conta9s matt]1 & he c all[ ?is "p ( 8 nature to develop itself1 i4e41 to ?rive & en]vate him2 or he c recognise & fight aga9/ x--s t he1 & he alone1 c get at ! tru? ab\t woman4 ,b woman _c develop except ?r\gh man4 ,! mean+ ( man & woman is fir/ arriv$ at :5 we exam9e _! mutual sexual & erotic relations4 ,woman's deepe/ desire is to be =m$ by man1 & s to receive h] be+4 ,woman desires t man %\ld imp>t op9ions to h] q diff]5t to ^? %e held be=e1 %e is cont5t to let h]self be turn$ by him f :at %e _h till !n ?\ght "r4 ,%e wi%es to be tak5 to pieces z a :ole1 s t he may build h] up aga94 ,woman is fir/ creat$ by man's w--he dom9ates h] & *anges h] :ole be+ 7hypnotism74 ,"h is ! explanation ( ! relation ( ! psy*ical to ! physical 9 man & woman4 ,man assumes a reciprocal action ( body & m9d1 9 ! s5se r t ! dom9ant m9d creates ! body1 ?an t ! m9d m]ely projects itself on ph5om5a1 :il/ ! woman accepts bo? m5tal & psy*ical ph5om5a empirically4 ,none ! less1 ev5 9 ! woman !re is "s reciprocal action4 ,h[ev]1 :il/ 9 ! man1 z ,s*op5hau] truly taught1 ! human be+ is 8 own creation1 8 own w makes & re-makes ! body1 ! woman is bodily influ5c$ & *ang$ by an ali5 w 7sugge/ion74 ,man n only =ms himself1 b woman also--a f> easi] matt]4 ,! my?s ( ! book ( ,g5esis & o!r cosmogonies1 :i* tea* t woman 0 creat$ out ( man1 are ne>] ! tru? ?an ! biological !ories ( desc5t1 accord+ to :i* males h be5 evolv$ f females4 ,we h n[ to come to ! "q left op5 9 *ap4 ix41 z to h[ woman1 :o is h]self )\t s\l or w1 is yet able to realise to :at ext5t a man may be end[$ ) !m2 & we may n[ endeav\r to answ] x4 ,( ?is "o mu/ be c]ta91 t :at woman notices1 t = :i* %e has a s5se1 is n ! special nature ( man1 b only ! g5]al fact & possibly ! grade ( 8 mal5ess4 ,x is q errone\s to suppose t woman has an innate capacity to und]/& ! individuality ( a man4 ,! lov]1 :o is s easily fool$ by ! unconsci\s simulation ( a deep] compreh5sion on ! "p ( 8 swee!>t1 may believe t he und]/&s himself ?r\gh a girl2 b ^? :o are less easily satisfi$ _c help see+ t wom5 only possess a s5se ( ! fact n ( ! individuality ( ! s\l1 only = ! =mal g5]al fact1 n = ! diff]5tiation ( ! p]sonality4 ,9 ord] to p]ceive & app]ceive ! special =m1 matt] mu/ n itself be =mless2 woman's relation to man1 h[ev]1 is no?+ b t ( matt] to =m1 & h] compreh5sion ( him no?+ b will+ness to be z mu* =m$ z possible by him2 ! in/9ct ( ^? )\t exi/5ce = exi/5ce4 ,fur!rmore1 ?is 8compreh5sion0 is n !oretical1 x is n sympa!tic1 x is only a desire to be sympa!tic2 x is importunate & egoi/ical4 ,woman has no relation to man & no s5se ( man1 b only = mal5ess2 & if %e is to be consid]$ z m sexual ?an man1 ?is great] claim is no?+ b ! int5se desire = ! fulle/ & mo/ def9ite =mation1 x is ! dem& = ! greate/ possible quantity ( exi/5ce4 ,&1 f9ally1 mat*-mak+ is no?+ else ?an ?is4 ,! sexuality ( wom5 is sup]-individual1 because !y are n limit$1 =m$1 individualis$ entities1 9 ! high] s5se ( ! ^w4 ,! supreme/ mom5t 9 a woman's life1 :5 h] orig9al nature1 h] natural desire manife/s itself1 is t 9 :i* h] own sexual union takes place4 ,%e embraces ! man passionately & presses him to h]2 x is ! greate/ joy ( passivity1 /rong] ev5 ?an ! cont5t$ feel+ ( a hypnotis$ p]son1 ! desire ( matt] :i* has j be5 =m$1 & wi%es to keep t =m = ev]4 ,t is :y a woman is s grateful to h] possessor1 ev5 if ! gratitude is limit$ to ! mom5t1 z 9 ! case ( pro/itutes ) no memory1 or1 if x la/s long]1 z 9 ! case ( m highly diff]5tiat$ wom54 ,?is endless /riv+ ( ! poor to atta* !mselves to ri*es1 ! altoge!r =mless & !re=e sup]-individual /riv+ ( ! in>ticulate to obta9 =m by contact1 to keep x indef9itely & s ga9 an exi/5ce1 is ! deepe/ motive 9 pair+4 ,pair+ is only possible because woman is n a monad1 & has no s5se ( individuality2 x is ! endless /riv+ ( no?+ to be some?+4 ,x is ?us t ! duality ( man & woman has gradually develop$ into complete dualism1 to ! dualism ( ! high] & l[] lives1 ( subject & object1 ( =m & matt]1 some?+ & no?+4 ,all metaphysical1 all transc5d5tal exi/5ce is logical & moral exi/5ce2 woman is non-logical & non-moral4 ,%e has no dislike = :at is logical & moral1 %e is n anti-logical1 %e is n anti-moral4 ,%e is n ! negation1 %e is1 r1 no?+4 ,%e is nei!r ! affirmation nor ! d5ial4 ,a man has 9 himself ! possibility ( be+ ! absolute some?+ or ! absolute no?+1 & !re=e 8 actions are direct$ t[>ds ! "o or ! o!r2 woman does n s91 = %e h]self is ! s9 :i* is a possibility 9 man4 ,! ab/ract male is ! image ( ,god1 ! absolute some?+2 ! female1 & ! female elem5t 9 ! male1 is ! symbol ( no?+2 t is ! significance ( ! woman 9 ! univ]se1 & 9 ?is way male & female complete & condition "o ano!r4 ,woman has a mean+ & a function 9 ! univ]se z ! opposite ( man2 & z ! human male surpasses ! animal male1 s ! human female surpasses ! female ( zoology4 ,x is n t limit$ exi/5ce & limit$ negation 7z 9 ! animal k+dom7 are at w> 9 humanity2 :at !re /& 9 opposition are unlimit$ exi/5ce & unlimit$ negation4 ,& s male & female make up humanity4 ,! mean+ ( woman is to be mean+less4 ,%e repres5ts negation1 ! opposite pole f ! ,godhead1 ! o!r possibility ( humanity4 ,& s no?+ is s despicable z a man become female1 & su* a p]son w be reg>d$ z ! supreme crim9al ev5 by himself4 ,& s also is to be expla9$ ! deepe/ fe> ( man2 ! fe> ( ! woman1 :i* is ! fe> ( unconsci\sness1 ! allur+ abyss ( annihilation4 ,an old woman manife/s once = all :at woman really is4 ,! beauty ( woman1 z may be exp]im5tally prov$1 is only creat$ by love ( a man2 a woman becomes m beautiful :5 a man loves h] because %e is passively respond+ to ! w :i* is 9 h] lov]2 h[ev] deep ?is may s\nd1 x is only a matt] ( ev]yday exp]i5ce4 ,all ! qualities ( woman dep5d on h] non-exi/5ce1 on h] want ( "*2 because %e has no true1 p]man5t1 b only a mortal life1 9 h] "* z ! advocate ( pair+ %e fur!rs ! sexual "p ( life1 & is fundam5tally trans=m$ by & susceptible to ! man :o has a physical influ5ce ov] h]4 ,?us ! ?ree fundam5tal *>act]s ( woman ) :i* ?is *apt] has dealt come toge!r 9 ! conception ( h] z ! non-exi/5t4 ,h] in/ability & untru?fulness are only negative d$uctions f ! premiss ( h] non-exi/5ce4 ,h] only positive "*1 ! conception ( h] z ! pair+ ag5t1 comes f x by a simple process ( analysis4 ,! nature ( woman is no m ?an pair+1 no m ?an sup]-individual sexuality4 ,if we turn to ! table ( ! two k9ds ( life giv5 e>li] 9 ?is *apt]1 x w be app>5t t e incl9ation f ! high] to ! l[] is a crime aga9/ oneself4 ,immorality is ! w t[>ds negation1 ! crav+ to *ange ! =m$ into ! =mless1 ! wi% = de/ruction4 ,& f ?is comes ! intimate relation betwe5 femal5ess & crime4 ,!re is a close relation betwe5 ! immoral & ! non-moral4 ,x is only :5 man accepts 8 own sexuality1 d5ies ! absolute 9 him1 turns to ! l[]1 t he gives woman exi/5ce4 ,! acceptance ( ! ,phallus is immoral4 ,x has always be5 ?\ght ( z hateful2 x has be5 ! image ( ,satan1 & ,dante made x ! c5tral pill> ( hell4 ,?us comes ab\t ! dom9ation ( ! male sexuality ov] ! female4 ,x is only :5 man is sexual t woman has exi/5ce & mean+4 ,h] exi/5ce is b\nd up ) ! ,phallus1 & s t is h] supreme "l & welcome ma/]4 ,sex1 9 ! =m ( man1 is woman's fate2 ! ,don ,juan is ! only type ( man :o has complete p[] ov] h]4 ,! curse1 :i* 0 said to be heavy on woman1 is ! evil w ( man3 no?+ is only a tool 9 ! h& ( ! w = no?+4 ,! e>ly ,fa!rs express$ x pa!tically :5 !y call$ woman ! h&maid ( ! devil4 ,= matt] 9 itself is no?+1 x c only obta9 exi/5ce ?r\gh =m4 ,! fall ( 8=m0 is ! corruption t takes place :5 =m endeav\rs to relapse into ! =mless4 ,:5 man became sexual he =m$ woman4 ,t woman is at all has happ5$ simply because man has accept$ 8 sexuality4 ,woman is m]ely ! result ( ?is affirmation2 %e is sexuality itself4 ,woman's exi/5ce is dep5d5t on man2 :5 man1 z man1 9 contradi/9ction to woman1 is sexual1 he is giv+ woman =m1 call+ h] into exi/5ce4 ,!re=e woman's "o object mu/ be to keep man sexual4 ,%e desires man z ,phallus1 & = ?is %e is ! advocate ( pair+4 ,%e is incapable ( mak+ use ( any creature except z a means to an end1 ! end be+ pair+2 & %e has b "o purpose1 t ( cont9u+ ! guilt ( man1 = %e w\ld disappe> ! mom5t man _h ov]come 8 sexuality4 ,man creat$ woman1 & w always create h] afre%1 z long z he is sexual4 ,j z he gives woman consci\sness1 s he gives h] exi/5ce4 ,woman is ! s9 ( man4 ,he tries to pay ! debt by love4 ,"h we h ! explanation ( :at seem$ l an obscure my? at ! end ( ! previ\s *apt]4 ,n[ we see :at 0 hidd5 9 x3 t woman is no?+ be=e man's fall1 nor )\t x2 t he does n rob h] ( any?+ %e _h be=e4 ,! crime man has committ$ 9 creat+ woman1 & /ill commits 9 ass5t+ to h] purpose1 he excuses to woman by 8 eroticism4 ,:5ce o!rwise w\ld come ! g5]osity ( love1 :i* c nev] be satisfi$ by giv+8 ,h[ is x t love is s anxi\s to end[ woman ) a s\l1 & n any o!r creature8 ,:5ce comes x t a *ild _c love until love co9cides ) sexuality1 ! /age ( pub]ty1 ) ! repeat$ =m+ ( woman1 ) ! r5ew+ ( s98 ,woman is no?+ b man's expression & projection ( 8 own sexuality4 ,e man creates himself a woman1 9 :i* he embodies himself & 8 own guilt4 ,b woman is n h]self guilty2 %e is made s by ! guilt ( o!rs1 & ev]y?+ = :i* woman is blam$ %\ld be laid at man's door4 ,love /rives to cov] guilt1 in/ead ( conqu]+ x2 x elevates woman in/ead ( nullify+ h]4 ,! 8some?+0 folds ! 8no?+0 9 its arms1 & ?9ks ?us to free ! univ]se ( negation & dr[n all objections2 :]eas ! no?+ w\ld only disappe> if ! some?+ put x away4 ,s9ce man's hatr$ = woman is n consci\s hatr$ ( 8 own sexuality1 8 love is 8 mo/ int5se ef=t to save woman z woman1 in/ead ( desir+ to nullify h] 9 himself4 ,& ! consci\sness ( guilt comes f ! fact t ! object ( guilt is covet$ in/ead ( be+ annihilat$4 ,woman alone1 !n1 is guilt2 & is s ?r\gh man's fault4 ,& if femal5ess signifies pair+1 x is only because all guilt endeav\rs to increase its circle4 ,:at woman1 always unconsci\sly1 accompli%es1 %e does because %e _c help x2 x is h] reason = be+1 h] :ole nature4 ,%e is only a "p ( man1 8 o!r1 in]adicable1 8 l[] "p4 ,s matt] appe>s to be z inexplicable a riddle z =m2 woman z un5d+ z man1 negation z et]nal z exi/5ce2 b ?is et]nity is only ! et]nity ( guilt4 ,,*apt] ,,xiii ,,judaism ,x w\ld n be surpris+ if to _m x %\ld seem f ! =ego+ argum5ts t 8m50 h come out ( !m too well1 &1 z a collective body1 h be5 plac$ on an exagg]at$ly l(ty p$e/al4 ,! conclusions drawn f ^! argum5ts1 h[ev] surpris$ e ,phili/9e & "y simpleton w\ld be to le>n t 9 himself he comprises ! :ole _w1 _c be oppos$ & confut$ by *eap reason+2 yet ! treatm5t ( ! male sex mu/ n simply be consid]$ too indulg5t1 or due to a direct t5d5cy to omit all ! repulsive & small side ( manhood 9 ord] to fav\rably repres5t its be/ po9ts4 ,! accusation w\ld be unju/ifi$4 ,x does n ent] ! au?or's m9d to idealise man 9 ord] m easily to l[] ! e/imation ( woman4 ,s mu* n>r[ness & s mu* co>s5ess (t5 ?rive b5ea? ! empirical repres5tation ( manhood t x is a "q ( ! bett] possibilities ly+ 9 e man1 neglect$ by him or p]ceiv$ ei!r ) pa9ful cle>ness or dull animosity2 possibilities :i* z su* 9 woman nei!r actually nor m$itatively ev] come to any acc\nt4 ,& "h ! au?or _c 9 any wise really rely on ! dissimil>ities betwe5 m51 h[ev] little he may impugn _! importance4 ,x is1 !re=e1 a "q ( e/abli%+ :at woman is n1 & truly 9 h] !re is inf9itely mu* want+ :i* is nev] q miss+ ev5 9 ! mo/ m$iocre & plebeian ( m54 ,t :i* is ! positive attribute ( ! woman1 9 s f> z a positive c be spok5 ( 9 reg>d to su* a be+1 w con/antly be f\nd also 9 _m m54 ,!re are1 z has already (t5 be5 demon/rat$1 m5 :o h become wom5 or h rema9$ wom52 b !re is no woman :o has surpass$ c]ta9 circumscrib$1 n p>ticul>ly elevat$ moral & intellectual limits4 ,&1 !re=e1 ,i mu/ aga9 ass]t t ! woman ( ! highe/ /&>d is immeasurably b5ea? ! man ( l[e/ /&>d4 ,^! objections may g ev5 fur!r & t\* a po9t :]e ! ignor+ ( !ory mu/ assur$ly become repreh5sible4 ,!re are1 to wit1 nations & races ^: m51 ?\gh !y c 9 no wise be reg>d$ z int]m$iate =ms ( ! sexes1 are f\nd to approa* s slightly & s r>ely to ! ideal ( manhood z set =? 9 my argum5t1 t ! pr9ciples1 inde$ ! entire f\ndation on :i* ?is "w re/s1 w\ld seem to be sev]ely %ak5 by _! exi/5ce4 ,:at %all we make1 = example1 out ( ! ,*9ese1 ) _! fem99e fre$om f int]nal crav+s & _! incapacity = e ef=t8 ,"o might feel tempt$ to believe 9 ! complete effem9acy ( ! :ole race4 ,x c at lea/ be no m]e :im ( ! entire nation t ! ,*9aman habitually we>s a pigtail1 & t ! gr[? ( 8 be>d is ( ! v ?9ne/4 ,b h[ does ! matt] /& ) ! negroes8 ,a g5ius has p]haps sc>cely ev] appe>$ among/ ! negroes1 & ! /&>d ( _! morality is almo/ univ]sally s l[ t x is beg9n+ to be ackn[l$g$ 9 ,am]ica t _! emancipation 0 an act ( imprud5ce4 ,if1 consequ5tly1 ! pr9ciple ( ! int]m$iate =ms ( ! sexes may p]haps enjoy a prospect ( becom+ ( importance to racial an?ropology 7s9ce 9 "s peoples a great] %>e ( womani%ness w\ld seem to be g5]ally dissem9at$71 x mu/ yet be conc$$ t ! =ego+ d$uctions ref] above all to ,aryan m5 & ,aryan wom54 ,9 h[ f>1 9 ! o!r great races ( mank9d1 uni=mity ) ! /&>d ( ! ,aryan race may reign1 or :at has prev5t$ & h9d]$ ?is2 to arrive m ne>ly at su* k w\ld require 9 ! fir/ in/ance ! mo/ int5se rese>* into racial *>act]i/ics4 ,! ,jewi% race1 :i* has be5 *os5 by me z a subject ( discussion1 because1 z w be %[n1 x pres5ts ! grave/ & mo/ =midable difficulties = my views1 appe>s to possess a c]ta9 an?ropological relation%ip ) bo? negroes & ,mongolians4 ,! readily curl+ hair po9ts to ! negro2 admixture ( ,mongolian blood is sugge/$ by ! p]fectly ,*9ese or ,malay =mation ( face & skull :i* is s (t5 to be met ) among/ ! ,jews & :i* is associat$ ) a yell[i% complexion4 ,?is is no?+ m ?an ! result ( ev]yday exp]i5ce1 & ^! rem>ks mu/ n be o!rwise und]/ood2 ! an?ropological "q ( ! orig9 ( ! ,jewi% race is app>5tly insoluble1 & ev5 su* an int]e/+ answ] to x z t giv5 by ,h4 ,s4 ,*amb]la9 has rec5tly met ) mu* opposition4 ,! au?or does n possess ! k necess>y to treat ( ?is2 :at w be "h briefly1 b z f> z possible pr(\ndly analys$1 is ! psy*ical peculi>ity ( ! ,jewi% race4 ,?is is an obligatory task impos$ by psy*ological obs]vation & analysis4 ,x is und]tak5 indep5d5tly ( pa/ hi/ory1 ! details ( :i* mu/ be unc]ta94 ,! ,jewi% race (f]s a problem ( ! deepe/ significance = ! /udy ( all races1 & 9 itself x is intimately b\nd up ) _m ( ! mo/ tr\blesome problems ( ! day4 ,i mu/1 h[ev]1 make cle> :at ,i mean by ,judaism2 ,i mean nei!r a race nor a p nor a recognis$ cre$4 ,i ?9k ( x z a t5d5cy ( ! m9d1 z a psy*ological con/itution :i* is a possibility = all mank9d1 b :i* has become actual 9 ! mo/ conspicu\s fa%ion only among/ ! ,jews4 ,antisemitism itself w confirm my po9t ( view4 ,! pure/ ,aryans by desc5t & disposition are seldom ,antisemites1 al?\gh !y are (t5 unpleasantly mov$ by "s ( ! peculi> ,jewi% traits2 !y _c 9 ! lea/ und]/& ! ,antisemite movem5t1 & are1 9 consequ5ce ( _! def5ce ( ! ,jews1 (t5 call$ ,philosemites2 & yet ^! p]sons writ+ on ! subject ( ! hatr$ ( ,jews1 h be5 guilty ( ! mo/ pr(\nd misund]/&+ ( ! ,jewi% "*4 ,! aggressive ,antisemites1 on ! o!r h&1 ne>ly always display c]ta9 ,jewi% *>act]s1 sometimes app>5t 9 _! faces1 al?\gh !y may h no real admixture ( ,jewi% blood4#be #be ,zola 0 a typical case ( a p]son absolutely )\t trace ( ! ,jewi% qualities1 &1 !re=e1 a philosemite4 ,! greate/ g5iuses1 on ! o!r h&1 h ne>ly always be5 antisemites 7,tacitus1 ,pascal1 ,voltaire1 ,h]d]1 ,goe!1 ,kant1 ,jean ,paul1 ,s*op5hau]1 ,grillp>z]1 ,wagn]72 ?is comes ab\t f ! fact z g5iuses !y h some?+ ( ev]y?+ 9 _! natures1 & s c und]/& ,judaism4 ,! explanation is simple4 ,p love 9 o!rs ! qualities !y w\ld l to h b d n actually h 9 any great degree2 s also we hate 9 o!rs only :at we d n wi% to be1 & :at not)/&+ we are p>tly4 ,we hate only qualities to :i* we approximate1 b :i* we realise fir/ 9 o!r p]sons4 ,?us ! fact is expla9$ t ! bitt]e/ ,antisemites are to be f\nd among/ ! ,jews !mselves4 ,= only ! q ,jewi% ,jews1 l ! completely ,aryan ,aryans1 are n at all ,antisemitically dispos$2 among ! rema9d] only ! common] natures are actively ,antisemitic & pass s5t5ce on o!rs )\t hav+ once sat 9 judgm5t on !mselves 9 ^! matt]s2 & v few ex]cise _! ,antisemitism fir/ on !mselves4 ,?is "o ?+1 h[ev]1 rema9s none ! less c]ta93 :oev] dete/s ! ,jewi% disposition dete/s x fir/ ( all 9 himself2 t he %\ld p]secute x 9 o!rs is m]ely 8 endeav\r to sep>ate himself 9 ?is way f ,jewi%ness2 he /rives to %ake x (f & to localise x 9 8 fell[-creatures1 & s = a mom5t to dream himself free ( x4 ,hatr$1 l love1 is a project$ ph5om5on2 t p]son alone is hat$ :o rem9ds "o unpleasantly ( oneself4 ,! ,antisemitism ( ! ,jews be>s te/imony to ! fact t no "o :o has _h exp]i5ce ( !m consid]s !m loveable--n ev5 ! ,jew himself2 ! ,antisemitism ( ! ,aryans grants u an insight no less full ( significance3 x is t ! ,jew & ! ,jewi% race mu/ n be conf\nd$4 ,!re are ,aryans :o are m ,jewi% ?an ,jews1 & real ,jews :o are m ,aryan ?an c]ta9 ,aryans4 ,i ne$ n enum]ate ^? non-semites :o _h mu* ,jewi%ness 9 !m1 ! less] 7l ! well-kn[n ,fr$]ick ,nicolai ( ! eighte5? c5tury7 nor ^? ( mod]ate greatness 7"h ,fr$]ick ,s*ill] c sc>cely be omitt$71 nor w ,i analyse _! ,jewi%ness4 ,above all ,ri*>d ,wagn]--! bitt]e/ ,antisemite--_c be held free f an accretion ( ,jewi%ness ev5 9 8 art1 h[ev] little "o be misl$ by ! feel+ :i* sees 9 him ! greate/ arti/ en%r9$ 9 hi/orical humanity2 & ?is1 ?\gh indubitably 8 ,siegfri$ is ! mo/ un-,jewi% type imag9able4 ,z ,wagn]'s av]sion to gr& op]a & ! /age really l$ to ! /ronge/ attraction1 an attraction ( :i* he 0 himself consci\s1 s 8 music1 :i*1 9 ! unique simplicity ( its motifs1 is ! mo/ p[]ful 9 ! _w1 _c be decl>$ free f obtrusiv5ess1 l\dness1 & lack ( di/9ction2 f "s consci\sness ( ?is ,wagn] tri$ to ga9 coh]5ce by ! extreme in/rum5tation ( 8 works4 ,x _c be d5i$ 7!re c be no mi/ake ab\t x7 t ,wagn]'s music produces ! deepe/ impression n only on ,jewi% ,antisemites1 :o h nev] completely %ak5 (f ,jewi%ness1 b also on ,indo-,g]manic ,antisemites4 ,f ! music ( 8,p>sifal10 :i* to g5u9e ,jews w ev] rema9 z unapproa*able z its poetry1 f ! ,pilgrim's m>* & ! procession to ,rome 9 8,tannhus]10 & assur$ly f _m ano!r "p1 !y turn away4 ,d\btless1 also1 none b a ,g]man c\ld make s cle>ly manife/ ! v ess5ce ( ! ,g]man race z ,wagn] has succe$$ 9 do+ 9 ! 8,mei/]s+]s ( ,nurnb]g40 ,9 ,wagn] "o ?9ks con/antly ( t side ( 8 "* :i* leans t[>ds ,feu]ba*1 in/ead ( t[>ds ,s*op5hau]4 ,"h no n>r[ psy*ological depreciation ( ?is great man is int5d$4 ,judaism 0 to him ! greate/ help 9 rea*+ a cle>] und]/&+ & ass]tion ( ! extremes )9 him 9 8 /ruggle to rea* 8,siegfri$0 & 8,p>sifal10 & 9 giv+ to ,g]man nature ! highe/ means ( expression :i* has probably ev] be5 f\nd 9 ! pages ( hi/ory4 ,yet a great] ?an ,wagn] 0 oblig$ to ov]come ! ,jewi%ness )9 him be=e he f\nd 8 special vocation2 & x is1 z previ\sly /at$1 p]haps its great significance 9 ! _w's hi/ory & ! imm5se m]it ( ,judaism t x & no?+ else1 leads ! ,aryan to a k ( himself & w>ns him aga9/ himself4 ,= ?is ! ,aryan has to ?ank ! ,jew t1 ?r\gh him1 he kn[s to gu>d aga9/ ,judaism z a possibility )9 himself4 ,?is example w suffici5tly illu/rate :at1 9 my e/imation1 is to be und]/ood by ,judaism4 ,i d n ref] to a nation or to a race1 to a cre$ or to a scripture4 ,:5 ,i speak ( ! ,jew ,i mean nei!r an individual nor ! :ole body1 b mank9d 9 g5]al1 9 s f> z x has a %>e 9 ! platonic idea ( ,judaism4 ,my purpose is to analyse ?is idea4 ,t ^! rese>*es %\ld be includ$ 9 a "w devot$ to ! *>act]ology ( ! sexes may seem an undue ext5sion ( my subject4 ,b "s reflection w lead to ! surpris+ result t ,judaism is saturat$ ) fem99ity1 ) precisely ^? qualities ! ess5ce ( :i* ,i h %[n to be 9 ! /ronge/ opposition to ! male nature4 ,x w\ld n be difficult to make a case = ! view t ! ,jew is m saturat$ ) fem99ity ?an ! ,aryan1 to su* an ext5t t ! mo/ manly ,jew is m fem99e ?an ! lea/ manly ,aryan4 ,?is int]pretation w\ld be errone\s4 ,x is mo/ important to lay /ress on ! agreem5ts & diff]5ces simply because s _m po9ts t become obvi\s 9 dissect+ woman reappe> 9 ! ,jew4 ,let me beg9 ) ! analogies4 ,x is notable t ! ,jews1 ev5 n[ :5 at lea/ a relative security ( t5ure is possible1 pref] moveable prop]ty1 &1 9 spite ( _! acquisitiv5ess1 h little real s5se ( p]sonal prop]ty1 especially 9 its mo/ *>act]i/ic =m1 l&$ prop]ty4 ,prop]ty is indissolubly connect$ ) ! self1 ) individuality4 ,x is 9 h>mony ) ! =ego+ t ! ,jew is s readily dispos$ to communism4 ,communism mu/ be di/+ui%$ cle>ly f socialism1 ! =m] be+ bas$ on a community ( goods1 an abs5ce ( individual prop]ty1 ! latt] mean+1 9 ! fir/ place a co-op]ation ( individual ) individual1 ( work] ) work]1 & a recognition ( human individuality 9 e "o4 ,socialism is ,aryan 7,ow51 ,c>lyle1 ,rusk91 ,fi*te74 ,communism is ,jewi% 7,m>x74 ,mod]n social democracy has mov$ f> ap>t f ! e>li] socialism1 precisely because ,jews h tak5 s l>ge a %>e 9 develop+ x4 ,9 spite ( ! associative elem5t 9 x1 ! ,m>xian doctr9e does n lead 9 any way t[>ds ! ,/ate z a union ( all ! sep>ate individual aims1 z ! high] unit comb9+ ! purposes ( ! l[] units4 ,su* a conception is z =eign to ! ,jew z x is to ! woman4 ,= ^! reasons ,zionism mu/ rema9 an impracticable ideal1 not)/&+ ! fa%ion 9 :i* x has br\ght toge!r "s ( ! noble/ qualities ( ! ,jews4 ,zionism is ! negation ( ,judaism1 = ! conception ( ,judaism involves a _w-wide di/ribution ( ! ,jews4 ,citiz5%ip is an un-,jewi% ?+1 & !re has nev] be5 & nev] w be a true ,jewi% ,/ate4 ,! ,/ate involves ! aggregation ( individual aims1 ! =mation ( & ob$i5ce to self-impos$ laws2 & ! symbol ( ! ,/ate1 if no?+ m1 is its head *os5 by free election4 ,! opposite conception is t ( an>*y1 ) :i* pres5t-day communism is closely alli$4 ,! ideal ,/ate has nev] be5 hi/orically realis$1 b 9 e case !re is at lea/ a m9imum ( ?is high] unit1 ?is conception ( an ideal p[] :i* di/+ui%es ! ,/ate f ! m]e collection ( human be+s 9 b>racks4 ,r\sseau's mu*-despis$ !ory ( ! consci\s co-op]ation ( individuals to =m a ,/ate des]ves m att5tion ?an x n[ receives4 ,"s e?ical notion ( free comb9ation mu/ always be includ$4 ,! true conception ( ! ,/ate is =eign to ! ,jew1 because he1 l ! woman1 is want+ 9 p]sonality2 8 failure to grasp ! idea ( true society is due to 8 lack ( a free intelligible ego4 ,l wom51 ,jews t5d to adh]e toge!r1 b !y d n associate z free indep5d5t individuals mutually respect+ ea* o!r's individuality4 ,z !re is no real dignity 9 wom51 s :at is meant by ! ^w 8g5tleman0 does n exi/ among/ ! ,jews4 ,! g5u9e ,jew fails 9 ?is innate good bre$+ by :i* alone individuals hon\r _! own individuality & respect t ( o!rs4 ,!re is no ,jewi% nobility1 & ?is is ! m surpris+ z ,jewi% p$igrees c be trac$ back = ?\s&s ( ye>s4 ,! famili> ,jewi% arrogance has a simil> explanation2 x spr+s f want ( true k ( himself & ! consequ5t ov]p[]+ ne$ he feels to enhance 8 own p]sonality by depreciat+ t ( 8 fell[-creatures4 ,& s1 al?\gh 8 desc5t is incomp>ably long] ?an t ( ! memb]s ( ,aryan ari/ocracies1 he has an inord9ate love = titles4 ,! ,aryan respect = 8 ance/ors is root$ 9 ! conception t !y 7 8 ance/ors2 x dep5ds on 8 valuation ( 8 own p]sonality1 &1 9 spite ( ! communi/ic /r5g? & antiquity ( ! ,jewi% traditions1 ?is individual s5se ( ance/ry is lack+4 ,! faults ( ! ,jewi% race h (t5 be5 attribut$ to ! repression ( t race by ,aryans1 & _m ,*ri/ians are /ill dispos$ to blame !mselves 9 ?is respect4 ,b ! self-reproa* is n ju/ifi$4 ,outw>d circum/ances d n m\ld a race 9 "o direction1 unless !re is 9 ! race ! innate t5d5cy to respond to ! m\ld+ =ces2 ! total result comes at lea/ z mu* f ! natural disposition z f ! modify+ circum/ances4 ,we "k n[ t ! pro( ( ! inh]itance ( acquir$ *>act]s has brok5 d[n1 &1 9 ! human race /ill m ?an ! l[] =ms ( life1 x is c]ta9 t individual & racial *>act]s p]si/ 9 spite ( all adaptive m\ld+4 ,:5 m5 *ange1 x is f )91 outw>ds1 unless ! *ange1 z 9 ! case ( wom51 is a m]e sup]ficial imitation ( real *ange1 & is n root$ 9 _! natures4 ,& h[ c we reconcile ! idea t ! ,jewi% "* is a mod]n modification ) ! hi/ory ( ! f\ndation ( ! race1 giv5 9 ! ,old ,te/am5t )\t any disapprobation ( h[ ! patri>* ,jacob deceiv$ 8 dy+ fa!r1 *eat$ 8 bro!r ,esau & ov]-rea*$ 8 fa!r-9-law1 ,laban8 ,! def5d]s ( ! ,jew h rightly acquitt$ him ( any t5d5cy to he9\s crimes1 & ! legal /ati/ics ( diff]5t c\ntries confirm ?is4 ,! ,jew is n really anti-moral4 ,b1 none ! less1 he does n repres5t ! highe/ e?ical type4 ,he is r non-moral1 nei!r v good nor v bad1 ) no?+ 9 him ( ei!r ! angel or ! devil4 ,not)/&+ ! ,book ( ,job & ! /ory ( ,ed51 x is pla9 t ! conceptions ( a ,supreme ,good & a ,supreme ,evil are n truly ,jewi%2 ,i h no wi% to ent] ^u ! l5g?y & controv]sial topics ( ,biblical criticism1 b at ! lea/ ,i %all be on sure gr\nd :5 ,i say t ^! conceptions play ! lea/ significant "p 9 mod]n ,jewi% life4 ,or?odox or unor?odox1 ! mod]n ,jew does n conc]n himself ) ,god & ! ,devil1 ) ,heav5 & ,hell4 ,if he does n rea* ! heights ( ! ,aryan1 he is also less incl9$ to commit murd] or o!r crimes ( viol5ce4 ,s also 9 ! case ( ! woman2 x is easi] = h] def5d]s to po9t to ! infrequ5cy ( h] commission ( s]i\s crimes ?an to prove h] intr9sic morality4 ,! homology ( ,jew & woman becomes clos] ! fur!r exam9ation goes4 ,!re is no female devil1 & no female angel2 only love1 ) its bl9d av]sion f actuality1 sees 9 woman a heav5ly nature1 & only hate sees 9 h] a prodigy ( wick$ness4 ,greatness is abs5t f ! nature ( ! woman & ! ,jew1 ! greatness ( morality1 or ! greatness ( evil4 ,9 ! ,aryan man1 ! good & bad pr9ciples ( ,kant's religi\s philosophy are ev] pres5t1 ev] 9 /rife4 ,9 ! ,jew & ! woman1 good & evil are n di/9ct f "o ano!r4 ,jews1 !n1 d n live z free1 self-gov]n+ individuals1 *oos+ betwe5 virtue & vice 9 ! ,aryan fa%ion4 ,!y are a m]e collection ( simil> individuals ea* ca/ 9 ! same m\ld1 ! :ole =m+ z x 7 a cont9u\s plasmodium4 ,! ,antisemite has (t5 ?\ght ( ?is z a def5sive & aggressive union1 & has =mulat$ ! conception ( a ,jewi% 8solid>ity40 ,!re is a deep confusion "h4 ,:5 "s accusation is made aga9/ "s unkn[n memb] ( ! ,jewi% race1 all ,jews secretly take ! "p ( ! accus$1 & wi%1 hope =1 & seek to e/abli% 8 innoc5ce4 ,b x mu/ n be ?\ght t !y are int]e/+ !mselves m 9 ! fate ( ! individual ,jew ?an !y w\ld d 9 ! case ( an individual ,*ri/ian4 ,x is ! m5ace to ,judaism 9 g5]al1 ! fe> t ! %ameful %ad[ may d h>m to ,judaism z a :ole1 :i* is ! orig9 ( ! app>5t feel+ ( sympa?y4 ,9 ! same way1 wom5 are delight$ :5 a memb] ( _! sex is depreciat$1 & w !mselves assi/1 until ! proce$+ seems to ?r[ a disadvantage\s light ov] ! sex 9 g5]al1 s fright5+ m5 f m>riage4 ,! race or sex alone is def5d$1 n ! individual4 ,x w\ld be easy to und]/& :y ! family 79 its biological n its legal s5se7 plays a l>g] rle among/ ! ,jews ?an among/ any o!r p2 ! ,engli%1 :o 9 c]ta9 ways are ak9 to ! ,jews1 com+ next4 ,! family1 9 ?is biological s5se1 is fem99e & mat]nal 9 its orig91 & has no relation to ! ,/ate or to society4 ,! fusion1 ! cont9uity ( ! memb]s ( ! family1 rea*es its highe/ po9t among/ ! ,jews4 ,9 ! ,indo-,g]manic races1 especially 9 ! case ( ! m gift$1 b also 9 q ord9>y individuals1 !re is nev] complete h>mony betwe5 fa!r & son2 consci\sly1 or unconsci\sly1 !re is always 9 ! m9d ( ! son a c]ta9 feel+ ( impati5ce aga9/ ! man :o1 unask$1 br\ght him into ! _w1 gave him a "n1 & det]m9$ 8 limitations 9 ?is e>?ly life4 ,x is only among/ ! ,jews t ! son feels deeply root$ 9 ! family & is fully at "o ) 8 fa!r4 ,x sc>cely ev] happ5s among/ ,*ri/ians t fa!r & son are really fri5ds4 ,among/ ,*ri/ians ev5 ! daught]s /& a little fur!r ap>t f ! family circle ?an happ5s ) ,jewesses1 & m frequ5tly take up "s call+ :i* isolates !m & gives !m indep5d5t int]e/s4 ,we rea* at ?is po9t a fact 9 relation to ! argum5t ( ! la/ *apt]4 ,i %[$ !re t ! ess5tial elem5t 9 ! pair+ in/9ct 0 an indi/9ct s5se ( individuality & ( ! limits betwe5 individuals4 ,m5 :o are mat*-mak]s h always a ,jewi% elem5t 9 !m4 ,! ,jew is always m absorb$ by sexual matt]s ?an ! ,aryan1 al?\gh he is notably less pot5t sexually & less liable to be enme%$ 9 a great passion4 ,! ,jews are habitual mat*-mak]s1 & 9 no race does x s (t5 happ5 t m>riages are arrang$ by m54 ,?is k9d ( activity is c]ta9ly peculi>ly necess>y 9 _! case1 =1 z ,i h already /at$1 !re is no p among/ :i* m>riages = love are s r>e4 ,! organic disposition ( ! ,jews t[>ds mat*-mak+ is associat$ ) _! racial failure to compreh5d asceticism4 ,x is int]e/+ to note t ! ,jewi% ,rabbis h always be5 addict$ to speculations z to ! begett+ ( *ildr5 & h a ri* tradition on ! subject1 a natural result 9 ! case ( ! p :o inv5t$ ! phrase z to ! duty ( 8multiply+ & repl5i%+ ! e>?40 ,! pair+ in/9ct is ! great remov] ( ! limits betwe5 individuals2 & ! ,jew1 p> excell5ce1 is ! break] d[n ( su* limits4 ,he is at ! opposite pole f ari/ocrats1 ) :om ! pres]vation ( ! limits betwe5 individuals is ! lead+ idea4 ,! ,jew is an inborn communi/4 ,! ,jew's c>eless mann]s 9 society & 8 want ( social tact turn on ?is quality1 = ! res]ves ( social int]c\rse are simply b>ri]s to protect individuality4 ,i desire at ?is po9t aga9 to lay /ress on ! fact1 al?\gh x %\ld be self-evid5t1 t1 9 spite ( my l[ e/imate ( ! ,jew1 no?+ c\ld be fur!r f my int5tion ?an to l5d ! fa9te/ support to any practical or !oretical p]secution ( ,jews4 ,i am deal+ ) ,judaism1 9 ! platonic s5se1 z an idea4 ,!re is no m an absolute ,jew ?an an absolute ,*ri/ian4 ,i am n speak+ aga9/ ! individual1 :om1 inde$1 if t _h be5 s1 ,i %\ld h w\nd$ grossly & unnecess>ily4 ,wat*words1 su* z 8,buy only f ,*ri/ians10 h 9 reality a ,jewi% ta9t2 !y h a mean+ only = ^? :o reg>d ! race & n ! individual1 & :at is to be comp>$ ) !m is ! ,jewi% use ( ! ^w 8,goy10 :i* is n[ almo/ obsolete4 ,i h no wi% to boycott ! ,jew1 or by any su* immoral means to attempt to solve ! ,jewi% "q4 ,nor w ,zionism solve t "q2 z ,h4 ,s4 ,*amb]la9 has po9t$ out1 s9ce ! de/ruction ( ! ,temple at ,j]usalem1 ,judaism has ceas$ to be national1 & has become a spread+ p>asite1 /raggl+ all ov] ! e>? & f9d+ true root n[h]e4 ,be=e ,zionism is possible1 ! ,jew mu/ fir/ conqu] ,judaism4 ,to defeat ,judaism1 ! ,jew mu/ fir/ und]/& himself1 & w> aga9/ himself4 ,s f>1 ! ,jew has rea*$ no fur!r ?an to make & enjoy jokes aga9/ 8 own peculi>ities4 ,unconsci\sly he respects ! ,aryan m ?an himself4 ,only /eady resolution1 unit$ to ! highe/ self-respect1 c free ! ,jew f ,jewi%ness4 ,?is resolution1 be x ev] s /rong1 ev] s hon\rable1 c only be und]/ood & c>ri$ out by ! individual1 n by ! gr\p4 ,!re=e ! ,jewi% "q c only be solv$ individually2 e s+le ,jew mu/ try to solve x 9 8 prop] p]son4 ,!re is no o!r solution to ! "q & c be no o!r2 ,zionism w nev] succe$ 9 answ]+ x4 ,! ,jew1 inde$1 :o has ov]come1 ! ,jew :o has become a ,*ri/ian1 has ! fulle/ "r to be reg>d$ by ! ,aryan 9 8 individual capacity1 & no long] be condemn$ z belong+ to a race above :i* 8 moral ef=ts h rais$ him4 ,he may re/ assur$ t no "o w dispute 8 well-f\nd$ claim4 ,! ,aryan ( good social /&+ always feels ! ne$ to respect ! ,jew2 8 ,antisemitism be+ no joy1 no amusem5t to him4 ,!re=e he is displeas$ :5 ,jews make revelations ab\t ,jews1 & he :o does s may expect z few ?anks f t qu>t] z f ov]-s5sitive ,judaism itself4 ,above all1 ! ,aryan desires t ! ,jew %\ld ju/ify ,antisemitism by be+ baptiz$4 ,b ! dang] ( ?is outw>d ackn[l$gm5t ( 8 inw>d /ruggles ne$ n tr\ble ! ,jew :o wi%es = lib]ty )9 him4 ,he w long to rea* ! holy baptism ( ! ,_s1 ( :i* t ( ! body is b ! outw>d symbol4 ,to rea* s important & useful a result z :at ,jewi%ness & ,judaism really are1 w\ld be to solve "o ( ! mo/ difficult problems2 ,judaism is a mu* deep] riddle ?an ! _m ,antisemites believe1 & 9 v tru? a c]ta9 d>kness w always en%r\d x4 ,ev5 ! p>allel ) woman w soon fail u1 ?\gh n[ & !n x may help u fur!r4 ,9 ,*ri/ians pride & humility1 9 ,jews haught9ess & cr++1 are ev] at /rife2 9 ! =m] self-consci\sness & contrition1 9 ! latt] arrogance & bigotry4 ,9 ! total lack ( humility ( ! ,jew lies 8 failure to grasp ! idea ( grace4 ,f 8 slavi% disposition spr+s 8 het]onom\s code ( e?ics1 ! 8,decalogue10 ! mo/ immoral book ( laws 9 ! univ]se1 :i* enjo9s on ob$i5t foll[]s1 submission to ! p[]ful w ( an ext]ior influ5ce1 ) ! rew>d ( e>?ly well-be+ & ! conque/ ( ! _w4 ,8 relations ) ,jehovah1 ! ab/ract ,deity1 :om he slavi%ly fe>s1 ^: "n he nev] d>es to pron\nce1 *>act]ise ! ,jew2 he1 l ! woman1 requires ! rule ( an ext]ior au?ority4 ,accord+ to ! def9ition ( ,s*op5hau]1 ! ^w #8,god' indicates a man :o made ! _w4 ,?is c]ta9ly is a true lik5ess ( ! ,god ( ! ,jew4 ,( ! div9e 9 man1 ( 8! ,god :o 9 my bosom dwells10 ! true ,jew kn[s no?+2 = :at ,*ri/ & ,plato1 ,eckh>d & ,paul1 ,goe! & ,kant1 ! prie/s ( ! ,v$as1 ,fe*n]1 & e ,aryan h meant by div9e1 = :at ! say+1 8,i am ) y always ev5 to ! end ( ! _w0--= ! mean+ ( all ^! ! ,jew rema9s )\t und]/&+4 ,= ! ,god 9 man is ! human s\l1 & ! absolute ,jew is devoid ( a s\l4 ,x is inevitable1 !n1 t we %\ld f9d no trace ( belief 9 immortality 9 ! ,old ,te/am5t4 ,^? :o h no s\l c h no crav+ = immortality1 & s x is ) ! woman & ! ,jew2 8,anima naturalit] ,*ri/iana10 said ,t]tullian4 ,! abs5ce f ! ,jew ( true my/icism--,*amb]la9 has rem>k$ on ?is--has a simil> orig94 ,!y h no?+ b ! grosse/ sup]/ition & ! sy/em ( div9atory magic kn[n z ! 8,kabbala40 ,jewi% mono!ism has no relation to a true belief 9 ,god2 x is n a religion ( reason1 b a belief ( old wom5 f\nd$ on fe>4 ,:y is x t ! ,jewi% slave ( ,jehovah %\ld become s readily a mat]iali/ or a free?9k]8 ,x is m]ely ! alt]native phase to slav]y2 arrogance ab\t :at is n und]/ood is ! o!r side ( ! slavi% intellig5ce4 ,:5 x is fully recognis$ t ,judaism is to be reg>d$ r z an idea 9 :i* o!r races h a %>e1 ?an z ! absolute prop]ty ( a p>ticul> race1 !n ! ,judaic elem5t 9 mod]n mat]iali/ic sci5ce w be bett] und]/ood4 ,wagn] has giv5 expression to ,judaism 9 music2 !re rema9s to say some?+ ab\t ,judaism 9 mod]n sci5ce4 ,judaism 9 sci5ce1 9 ! wide/ int]pretation ( x1 is ! endeav\r to remove all transc5d5talism4 ,! ,aryan feels t ! ef=t to grasp ev]y?+1 & to ref] ev]y?+ to "s sy/em ( d$uctions1 really robs ?+s ( _! true mean+2 = him1 :at _c be discov]$ is :at gives ! _w its significance4 ,! ,jew has no fe> ( ^! hidd5 & secret elem5ts1 = he has no consci\sness ( _! pres5ce4 ,he tries to take a view ( ! _w z flat & commonplace z possible1 & to refuse to see all ! secret & spiritual mean+s ( ?+s4 ,8 view is non-philosophical r ?an anti-philosophical4 ,because fe> ( ,god 9 ! ,jew has no relation ) real religion1 ! ,jew is ( all p]sons ! lea/ p]turb$ by me*anical1 mat]iali/ic !ories ( ! _w2 he is readily beguil$ by ,d>w9ism & ! ridicul\s notion t m5 are d]iv$ f monkeys2 & n[ he is dispos$ to accept ! view t ! s\l ( man is an evolution t has tak5 place )9 ! human race2 =m]ly1 he 0 a mad devotee ( ,bu*n]1 n[ he is ready to foll[ ,o/wald4 ,x is due to a real disposition t ! ,jews %\ld be s prom95t 9 ! /udy ( *emi/ry2 !y cl+ naturally to matt]1 & expect to f9d ! solution ( ev]y?+ 9 its prop]ties4 ,& yet "o :o 0 ! greate/ ,g]man inve/igator ( all times1 ,kepl] himself1 wrote ! foll[+ hexamet] on *emi/ry3 8,o curas ,*ymicorum6 ,o quantum 9 pulv]e inane60 ,! pres5t turn ( m$ical sci5ce is l>gely due to ! influ5ce ( ! ,jews1 :o 9 su* numb]s h embrac$ ! m$ical pr(ession4 ,f ! e>lie/ times1 until ! dom9ance ( ! ,jews1 m$ic9e 0 closely alli$ ) religion4 ,b n[ !y w\ld make x a matt] ( drugs1 a m]e adm9i/ration ( *emicals4 ,b x c nev] be t ! organic w be expla9$ by ! inorganic4 ,fe*n] & ,prey] 7 "r :5 !y said t dea? came f life1 n life f dea?4 ,we see ?is tak+ place daily 9 individuals 79 human be+s1 = in/ance1 old age prep>es = dea? by a calcification ( ! tissues74 ,& z yet no "o has se5 ! organic arise f ! inorganic4 ,f ! "t ( ,s*wamm]dam to t ( ,pa/eur x has become m & m c]ta9 t liv+ ?+s nev] arise f :at is n alive4 ,surely ?is ontog5etic obs]vation %\ld be appli$ to phylog5y1 & we %\ld be equally c]ta9 t1 9 ! pa/1 ! dead arose f ! liv+4 ,! *emical int]pretation ( organisms sets ^! on a level ) _! own dead a%es4 ,we %\ld return f ?is ,judai/ic sci5ce to ! nobl] conceptions ( ,cop]nicus & ,galileo1 ,kepl] & ,eul]1 ,newton & ,l9nu1 ,lam>ck & ,f>aday1 ,spr5gel & ,cuvi]4 ,! free?9k]s ( to-day1 s\lless & n believ+ 9 ! s\l1 are incapable ( fill+ ! places ( ^! great m5 & ( rev]5tly realis+ ! pres5ce ( intr9sic secrets 9 nature4 ,x is ?is want ( dep? :i* expla9s ! abs5ce ( truly great ,jews2 l wom51 !y are )\t any trace ( g5ius4 ,! philosoph] ,sp9oza1 ab\t ^: purely ,jewi% desc5t !re c be no d\bt1 is incomp>ably ! greate/ ,jew ( ! la/ n9e hundr$ ye>s1 mu* great] ?an ! poet ,he9e 7:o1 inde$1 0 almo/ de/itute ( any quality ( true greatness7 or ?an t orig9al1 if %all[ pa9t]1 ,israels4 ,! extraord9>y fa%ion 9 :i* ,sp9oza has be5 ov]-e/imat$ is less due to 8 intr9sic m]it ?an to ! =tuit\s circum/ance t he 0 ! only ?9k] to :om ,goe! gave 8 att5tion4 ,= ,sp9oza himself !re 0 no deep problem 9 nature 7& 9 ?is he %[$ 8 ,jewi% "*71 z1 o!rwise1 he w\ld n h elaborat$ 8 ma!matical me?od1 a me?od accord+ to :i* ! explanation ( ?+s 0 to be f\nd 9 !mselves4 ,?is sy/em =m$ a refuge into :i* ,sp9oza c\ld escape f himself1 & x is n unnatural t x %\ld h be5 attractive to ,goe!1 :o 0 ! mo/ introspective ( m51 z x might h seem$ to (f] to him tranquillity & re/4 ,sp9oza %[$ 8 ,jewi%ness & ! limits t always conf9e ! ,jewi% _s 9 a /ill pla9] fa%ion2 ,i am n ?9k+ ( 8 failure to compreh5d ! ,/ate or ( 8 adhesion to ! ,hobbesian doctr9e ( univ]sal w>f>e z ! primitive condition ( mank9d4 ,! matt] goes deep]4 ,i h 9 m9d 8 complete rejection ( free-w--! ,jew is always a slave & a det]m9i/--& 8 view t individuals 7 m]e accid5ts into :i* ! univ]sal sub/ance _h fall54 ,! ,jew is nev] a believ] 9 monads4 ,& s !re is no wid] philosophical gulf ?an t betwe5 ,sp9oza & 8 mu* m em95t contempor>y1 ,leibnitz1 ! protagoni/ ( ! monad !ory1 or its /ill great] creator1 ,bruno1 ^: sup]ficial lik5ess ) ,sp9oza has be5 exagg]at$ 9 ! mo/ grotesque fa%ion4 ,j z ,jews & wom5 are )\t extreme good & extreme evil1 s !y nev] %[ ei!r g5ius or ! dep? ( /upidity ( :i* mank9d is capable4 ,! specific k9d ( intellig5ce = :i* ,jews & wom5 alike are notori\s is due simply to ! al]tness ( an exagg]at$ egotism2 x is due1 moreov]1 to ! b\ndless capacity %[n by bo? = pursu+ any object ) equal zeal1 because !y h no intr9sic /&>d ( value--no?+ 9 _! own s\ls by :i* to judge ( ! wor?9ess ( any p>ticul> object4 ,& s !y h unhamp]$ natural in/9cts1 su* z are n pres5t to help ! ,aryan man :5 8 transc5d5tal /&>d fails him4 ,i may n[ t\* ^u ! lik5ess ( ! ,engli% to ! ,jews1 a topic discuss$ at l5g? by ,wagn]4 ,x _c be d\bt$ t ( ! ,g]manic races ! ,engli% are 9 close/ relation%ip ) ! ,jews4 ,_! or?odoxy & _! devotion to ! ,sabba? af=d a direct indication4 ,! religion ( ! ,engli%man is always t+$ ) hypocrisy1 & 8 asceticism is l>gely prud]y4 ,! ,engli%1 l wom51 h be5 mo/ unproductive 9 religion & 9 music2 !re may be irreligi\s poets1 al?\gh n great arti/s1 b !re is no irreligi\s musician4 ,s1 also1 ! ,engli% h produc$ no great ar*itects or philosoph]s4 ,b]keley1 l ,swift & ,/]ne1 7 ,iri%2 ,c>lyle1 ,hamilton1 & ,burns 7 ,scot*4 ,%akespe>e & ,%elley1 ! two greate/ ,engli%m51 /& f> f ! p9nacle ( humanity2 !y d n rea* s f> z ,angelo & ,bee?ov54 ,if we consid] ,engli% philosoph]s we %all see t !re has be5 a great deg5]ation s9ce ! ,middle ,ages4 ,x began ) ,william ( ,ockham & ,duns ,scotus2 x proce$$ ?r\gh ,rog] ,bacon & 8 namesake1 ! ,*ancellor2 ?r\gh ,hobbes1 :o1 m5tally1 0 s ne> ak9 to ,sp9oza2 ?r\gh ! sup]ficial ,locke to ,h>tley1 ,prie/ley1 ,b5?am1 ! two ,mills1 ,lewes1 ,huxley1 & ,sp5c]4 ,^! are ! greate/ names 9 ! hi/ory ( ,engli% philosophy1 = ,adam ,smi? & ,david ,hume 7 ,scot*m54 ,x mu/ always be rememb]$ aga9/ ,engl&1 t f h] !re came ! s\lless psy*ology4 ,! ,engli%man has impress$ himself on ! ,g]man z a rigor\s empirici/ & z a practical politician1 b ^! two sides exhau/ 8 importance 9 philosophy4 ,!re has nev] yet be5 a true philosoph] :o made empiricism 8 basis1 & no ,engli%man has got beyond empiricism )\t ext]nal help4 ,none ! less1 ! ,engli%man mu/ n be confus$ ) ! ,jew4 ,!re is m ( ! transc5d5tal elem5t 9 him1 & 8 m9d is direct$ r f ! transc5d5tal to ! practical1 ?an f ! practical t[>ds ! transc5d5tal4 ,o!rwise he w\ld n be s readily dispos$ to hum\r1 unlike ! ,jew1 :o is ready to be witty only at 8 own exp5se or on sexual ?+s4 ,i am well aw>e h[ difficult are ! problems ( laught] & hum\r--j z difficult z any problems t are peculi> to man & n %>$ by him ) ! bea/s2 s difficult t nei!r ,s*op5hau] nor ,jean ,paul himself 7 able to elucidate !m4 ,hum\r has _m aspects2 9 "s m5 x seems to be an expression ( pity = !mselves or = o!rs1 b ?is elem5t is n suffici5t to di/+ui% x4 ,! ess5ce ( hum\r appe>s to me to consi/ 9 a lay+ ( /ress on empirical ?+s1 9 ord] t _! unreality may become m obvi\s4 ,ev]y?+ t is realis$ is laughable1 & 9 ?is way hum\r seems to be ! anti!sis ( eroticism4 ,! latt] welds m5 & ! _w toge!r1 & unites !m 9 a great purpose2 ! =m] loses ! bonds ( syn!sis & %[s ! _w z a silly affair4 ,! two /& some:at 9 ! relation ( pol>is$ & unpol>is$ light4 ,:5 ! great erotic wi%es to pass f ! limit$ to ! illimit$1 hum\r p\nces d[n on him1 pu%es him 9 front ( ! /age1 & laughs at him f ! w+s4 ,! hum\ri/ has n ! crav+ to transc5d space2 he is cont5t ) small ?+s2 8 dom9ion is nei!r ! sea nor ! m\nta9s1 b ! flat level pla94 ,he %uns ! idyllic1 & plunges deeply into ! commonplace1 only1 h[ev]1 to %[ its unreality4 ,he turns f ! imman5ce ( ?+s & w n he> ! transc5d5tal ev5 spok5 (4 ,wit seeks out contradictions 9 ! sph]e ( exp]i5ce2 hum\r goes deep] & %[s t exp]i5ce is a bl9d & clos$ sy/em2 bo? compromise ! ph5om5al _w by %[+ t ev]y?+ is possible 9 x4 ,trag$y1 on ! o!r h&1 %[s :at mu/ = all et]nity be impossible 9 ! ph5om5al _w2 & ?us trag$y & com$y alike1 ea* 9 _! own way1 are negations ( ! empiric4 ,! ,jew :o does n set out1 l ! hum\ri/1 f ! transc5d5tal1 & does n move t[>ds x1 l ! erotic1 has no int]e/ 9 depreciat+ :at is call$ ! actual _w1 & t nev] becomes = him ! p>aph]nalia ( a juggl] or ! nightm>e ( a mad-h\se4 ,hum\r1 because x recognises ! transc5d5tal1 if only by ! mode ( resolutely conceal+ x1 is ess5tially tol]ant2 satire1 on ! o!r h&1 is ess5tially intol]ant1 & is congru\s ) ! disposition ( ! ,jew & ! woman4 ,jews & wom5 are devoid ( hum\r1 b addict$ to mock]y4 ,9 ,rome !re 0 ev5 a woman 7,sulpicia7 :o wrote satires4 ,satire1 because ( its intol]ance1 is impossible to m5 9 society4 ,! hum\ri/1 :o kn[s h[ to keep ! trifles & littl5esses ( ph5om5a f tr\bl+ himself or o!rs1 is a welcome gue/4 ,hum\r1 l love1 moves away ob/acles f our pa?2 x makes possible a way ( reg>d+ ! _w4 ,! ,jew1 !re=e1 is lea/ addict$ to society1 & ! ,engli%man mo/ adapt$ = x4 ,! comp>ison ( ! ,jew ) ! ,engli%man fades out mu* m quickly ?an t ) ! woman4 ,bo? comp>isons fir/ arose 9 ! heat ( ! conflict z to ! wor? & ! nature ( ,jews4 ,i may aga9 ref] to ,wagn]1 :o n only int]e/$ himself deeply 9 ! problem ( ,judaism1 b r$iscov]$ ! ,jew 9 ! ,engli%man1 & ?rew ! %ad[ ( ,ahasu]us ov] 8 ,kundry1 probably ! mo/ p]fect repres5tation ( woman 9 art4 ,! fact t no woman 9 ! _w repres5ts ! idea ( ! wife s completely z ! ,jewess 7& n only 9 ! eyes ( ,jews7 /ill fur!r supports ! comp>ison betwe5 ,jews & wom54 ,9 ! case ( ! ,aryans1 ! metaphysical qualities ( ! male are "p ( 8 sexual attraction = ! woman1 & s1 9 a fa%ion1 %e puts on an appe>ance ( ^!4 ,! ,jew1 on ! o!r h&1 has no transc5d5tal quality1 & 9 ! %ap+ & m\ld+ ( ! wife leaves ! natural t5d5cies ( ! female nature a m unhamp]$ sph]e2 & ! ,jewi% woman1 accord+ly1 plays ! "p requir$ ( h]1 z h\se-"m or odalisque1 z ,cybele or ,cyprian1 9 ! fulle/ way4 ,! congruity betwe5 ,jews & wom5 fur!r reveals itself 9 ! extreme adaptability ( ! ,jews1 9 _! great tal5t = j\rnalism1 ! 8mobility0 ( _! m9ds1 _! lack ( deeply-root$ & orig9al ideas1 9 fact ! mode 9 :i*1 l wom51 because !y are no?+ 9 !mselves1 !y c become ev]y?+4 ,! ,jew is an individual1 n an individuality2 he is 9 con/ant close relation ) ! l[] life1 & has no %>e 9 ! high] metaphysical life4 ,at ?is po9t ! comp>ison betwe5 ! ,jew & ! woman breaks d[n2 ! be+-no?+ & becom+-all-?+s diff]s 9 ! two4 ,! woman is mat]ial :i* passively assumes any =m impress$ ^u x4 ,9 ! ,jew !re is a def9ite aggressiv5ess2 x is n because ( ! great impression t o!rs make on him t he is receptive2 he is no m subject to sugge/ion ?an ! ,aryan man1 b he adapts himself to e circum/ance & e race1 becom+1 l ! p>asite1 a new creature 9 e diff]5t ho/1 al?\gh rema9+ ess5tially ! same4 ,he assimilates himself to ev]y?+1 & assimilates ev]y?+2 he is n dom9at$ by o!rs1 b submits himself to !m4 ,! ,jew is gift$1 ! woman is n gift$1 & ! gift$ness ( ! ,jew reveals itself 9 _m =ms ( activity1 z1 = in/ance1 9 jurisprud5ce2 b ^! activities are always relative & nev] seat$ 9 ! creative fre$om ( ! w4 ,! ,jew is z p]si/5t z ! woman1 b 8 p]si/5ce is n t ( ! individual b ( ! race4 ,he is n uncondition$ l ! ,aryan1 b 8 limitations diff] f ^? ( ! woman4 ,! true peculi>ity ( ! ,jew reveals itself be/ 9 8 ess5tially irreligi\s nature4 ,i _c "h ent] on a discussion z to ! idea ( religion2 b x is en\gh to say t x is associat$ ess5tially ) an acceptance ( ! high] & et]nal 9 man z diff]5t 9 k9d1 & 9 no s5se to be d]iv$ f ! ph5om5al life4 ,! ,jew is em95tly ! unbeliev]4 ,fai? is t act ( man by :i* he ent]s into relation ) be+1 & religi\s fai? is direct$ t[>ds absolute1 et]nal be+1 ! 8life ev]la/+0 ( ! religi\s phrase4 ,! ,jew is really no?+ because he believes 9 no?+4 ,belief is ev]y?+4 ,x does n matt] if a man does n believe 9 ,god2 let him believe 9 a!ism4 ,b ! ,jew believes no?+2 he does n believe 8 own belief2 he d\bts z to 8 own d\bt4 ,he is nev] absorb$ by 8 own joy1 or engross$ by 8 own sorr[4 ,he nev] takes himself 9 e>ne/1 & s nev] takes any "o else 9 e>ne/4 ,he is cont5t to be a ,jew1 & accepts any disadvantages t come f ! fact4 ,we h n[ rea*$ ! fundam5tal diff]5ce betwe5 ! ,jew & ! woman4 ,nei!r believe 9 !mselves2 b ! woman believes 9 o!rs1 9 h] husb&1 h] lov]1 or h] *ildr51 or 9 love itself2 %e has a c5tre ( gravity1 al?\gh x is outside h] own be+4 ,! ,jew believes 9 no?+1 )9 him or )\t him4 ,8 want ( desire = p]man5t l&$ prop]ty & 8 atta*m5t to movable goods are m ?an symbolical4 ,! woman believes 9 ! man1 9 ! man outside h]1 or 9 ! man f :om %e takes h] inspiration1 & 9 ?is fa%ion c take h]self 9 e>ne/4 ,! ,jew takes no?+ s]i\sly2 he is frivol\s1 & je/s ab\t any?+1 ab\t ! ,*ri/ian's ,*ri/ianity1 ! ,jew's baptism4 ,he is nei!r a true reali/ nor a true empirici/4 ,"h ,i mu/ /ate c]ta9 limitations to my agreem5t ) ,*amb]la9's conclusions4 ,! ,jew is n really a conv9c$ empirici/ 9 ! fa%ion ( ! ,engli% philosoph]s4 ,! empirici/ believes 9 ! possibility ( rea*+ a complete sy/em ( k on an empirical basis2 he hopes = ! p]fection ( sci5ce4 ,! ,jew does n really believe 9 k1 nor is he a sceptic1 = he d\bts 8 own scepticism4 ,on ! o!r h&1 a brood+ c>e hov]s ov] ! non-metaphysical sy/em ( ,av5>ius1 & ev5 9 ,ern/ ,ma*'s adh]5ce to relativity !re are signs ( a deeply rev]5t attitude4 ,! empirici/s mu/ n be accus$ ( ,judaism because !y are %all[4 ,! ,jew is ! impi\s man 9 ! wide/ s5se4 ,piety is n some?+ ne> ?+s nor outside ?+s2 x is ! gr\ndwork ( ev]y?+4 ,! ,jew has be5 incorrectly call$ vulg>1 simply because he does n conc]n himself ) metaphysics4 ,all true culture t comes f )91 all t a man believes to be true & t s is true = him1 dep5d on rev]5ce4 ,rev]5ce is n limit$ to ! my/ic or ! religi\s man2 all sci5ce & all scepticism1 ev]y?+ t a man truly believes1 h rev]5ce z ! fundam5tal quality4 ,naturally x displays itself 9 diff]5t ways1 9 high s]i\sness & sanctity1 9 e>ne/ness & en?usiasm4 ,! ,jew is nev] ei!r en?usia/ic or indiff]5t1 he is nei!r ec/atic nor cold4 ,he rea*es nei!r ! heights nor ! dep?s4 ,8 re/ra9t becomes meagr5ess1 8 copi\sness becomes bomba/4 ,%\ld he v5ture into ! b\ndless realms ( inspir$ ?\ght1 he seldom rea*es beyond pa?os4 ,& al?\gh he _c embrace ! :ole _w1 he is = ev] covet\s ( x4 ,discrim9ation & g5]alisation1 /r5g? & love1 sci5ce & poetry1 e real & deep emotion ( ! human he>t1 h rev]5ce z _! ess5tial basis4 ,x is n necess>y t fai?1 z 9 m5 ( g5ius1 %\ld be 9 relation only to metaphysical entity2 x c ext5d also to ! empirical _w & appe> fully !re1 & yet none ! less be fai? 9 oneself1 9 wor?1 9 tru?1 9 ! absolute1 9 ,god4 ,z ! compreh5sive view ( religion & piety t ,i h giv5 may lead to miscon/ruction1 ,i propose to elucidate x fur!r4 ,true piety is n m]ely ! possession ( piety1 b also ! /ruggle to possess x2 x is f\nd equally 9 ! conv9c$ believ] 9 ,god 7,h&el or ,fe*n]71 & also 9 ! d\bt+ seek] 7,l5au & ,dr]72 x ne$ n be made obvi\s to ! _w 7z 9 ! case ( ,ba*71 x may display itself only 9 a rev]5t attitude 7,moz>t74 ,nor is piety necess>ily connect$ ) ! appe>ance ( a ,f\nd]2 ! anci5t ,greeks 7 ! mo/ rev]5t p t h liv$1 & h5ce _! culture 0 highe/2 b _! religion _h no p]sonal ,f\nd]4 ,religion is ! creation ( ! all2 & all t humanity c be is only ?r\gh religion4 ,s f> f ! ,jew be+ religi\s1 z has be5 assum$1 he is pr(\ndly irreligi\s4 ,7 !re ne$ to elaborate my v]dict on ! ,jews ,i might po9t out t ! ,jews1 alone ( peoples1 d n try to make conv]ts to _! fai?1 & t :5 conv]ts are made !y s]ve z objects ( puzzl$ ridicule to !m4 ,ne$ ,i ref] to ! mean+less =mality & ! repetitions ( ,jewi% pray]8 ,ne$ ,i rem9d read]s t ! ,jewi% religion is a m]e hi/orical tradition1 a memorial ( su* incid5ts z ! miracul\s cross+ ( ! ,r$ ,sea1 ) ! consequ5t ?anks ( c[>ds to _! ,savi\r2 & t x is no guide to ! mean+ & conduct ( life8 ,! ,jew is truly irreligi\s & fur!/ ( mank9d f fai?4 ,!re is no relation betwe5 ! ,jew himself & ! univ]se2 he has none ( ! h]oism ( fai?1 j z he has none ( ! disa/] ( absolute unbelief4 ,x is n1 !n1 my/icism t ! ,jew is )\t1 z ,*amb]la9 ma9ta9s1 b rev]5ce4 ,if he 7 only an hone/-m9d$ mat]iali/ or a frank evolutioni/6 ,he is n a critic1 b only critical2 he is n a sceptic 9 ! ,c>tesian s5se1 n a d\bt] :o sets out f d\bt t[>ds tru?1 b an ironi/2 z1 = in/ance1 to take a conspicu\s example1 ,he9e4 ,:at1 !n1 is ! ,jew if he is no?+ t a man c be8 ,:at goes on )9 him if he is utt]ly )\t f9ality1 if !re is no gr\nd 9 him :i* ! plumb l9e ( psy*ology may rea*8 ,! psy*ological cont5ts ( ! ,jewi% m9d are always d\ble or multiple4 ,!re are always be=e him two or _m possibilities1 :]e ! ,aryan1 al?\gh he sees z widely1 feels himself limit$ 9 8 *oice4 ,i ?9k t ! idea ( ,judaism consi/s 9 ?is want ( reality1 ?is abs5ce ( any fundam5tal relation to ! ?+-9-&-=-itself4 ,he /&s1 s to speak1 outside reality1 )\t ev] ent]+ x4 ,he c nev] make himself "o ) any?+--nev] ent] into real relation%ips4 ,he is a zealot )\t zeal2 he has no %>e 9 ! unlimit$1 ! uncondition$4 ,he is )\t simplicity ( fai?1 & s is always turn+ to ea* new int]pretation1 s seem+ m al]t ?an ! ,aryan4 ,int]nal multiplicity is ! ess5ce ( ,judaism1 int]nal simplicity t ( ! ,aryan4 ,x might be urg$ t ! ,jewi% d\ble-m9d$ness is mod]n1 & is ! result ( new k /ruggl+ ) ! old or?odoxy4 ,! education ( ! ,jew1 h[ev]1 only acc5tuates 8 natural qualities1 & ! d\bt+ ,jew turns ) a r5ew$ zeal to money-mak+1 9 :i* only he c f9d 8 /&>d ( value4 ,a curi\s pro( ( ! abs5ce ( simplicity 9 ! m9d ( ! ,jew is t he seldom s+s1 n f ba%fulness1 b because he does n believe 9 8 own s++4 ,j z ! acut5ess ( ,jews has no?+ to d ) true p[] ( diff]5tiat+1 s 8 %yness ab\t s++ or ev5 ab\t speak+ 9 cle> positive tones has no?+ to d ) real res]ve4 ,x is a k9d ( inv]t$ pride2 hav+ no true s5se ( 8 own wor?1 he fe>s be+ made ridicul\s by 8 s++ or spee*4 ,! emb>rassm5t ( ! ,jew ext5ds to ?+s :i* h no?+ to d ) ! real ego4 ,x has be5 se5 h[ difficult x is to def9e ! ,jew4 ,he has nei!r sev]ity nor t5d]ness4 ,he is bo? t5aci\s & weak4 ,he is nei!r k+ nor lead]1 slave nor vassal4 ,he has no %>e 9 en?usiasm1 & yet he has little equanimity4 ,no?+ is self-evid5t to him1 & yet he is a/oni%$ at no?+4 ,he has no trace ( ,loh5gr9 9 him1 & none ( ,telramund4 ,he is ridicul\s z a memb] ( a /ud5ts' corps & he is equally ridicul\s z a 8phili/]40 ,because he believes 9 no?+1 he takes refuge 9 mat]ialism2 f ?is arises 8 av>ice1 :i* is simply an attempt to conv9ce himself t some?+ has a p]man5t value4 ,& yet he is no real tradesman2 :at is unreal1 insecure 9 ,g]man comm]ce1 is ! result ( ! ,jewi% speculative int]e/4 ,! erotics ( ! ,jew are s5tim5talism1 & _! hum\r is satire4 ,p]haps examples may help to expla9 my int]pretation ( ! ,jewi% "*1 & ,i po9t readily to ,ibs5's ,k+ ,hakon 9 ! 8,pret5d]s10 & to 8 ,dr4 ,/ockmann 9 8,! ,enemy ( ! ,p40 ,^! may make cle> :at is = ev] abs5t 9 ! ,jew4 ,judaism & ,*ri/ianity =m ! greate/ possible contra/s2 ! =m] is b]eft ( all true fai? & ( inn] id5tity1 ! latt] is ! highe/ expression ( ! highe/ fai?4 ,*ri/ianity is h]oism at its highe/ po9t2 ,judaism is ! extreme ( c[>dl9ess4 ,*amb]la9 has said mu* t is true & /rik+ z to ! fe>ful awe-/ruck want ( und]/&+ t ! ,jew displays ) reg>d to ! p]son & tea*+ ( ,*ri/1 = ! comb9ation ( w>rior & suff]] 9 ,him1 = ,8 life & dea?4 ,none ! less1 x w\ld be wrong to /ate t ! ,jew is an enemy ( ,*ri/1 t he repres5ts ! anti-,*ri/2 x is only t he feels no relation ) ,him4 ,x is /rong-m9d$ ,aryans1 malefactors1 :o hate ,jesus4 ,! ,jew does n get beyond be+ bewild]$ & di/urb$ by ,him1 z some?+ t passes 8 wit to und]/&4 ,& yet x has /ood ! ,jew 9 good /ead t ! ,new ,te/am5t seem$ ! outcome & f9e fl[] ( ! ,old1 ! fulfilm5t ( its ,messianic prophecies4 ,! pol> opposition betwe5 ,judaism & ,*ri/ianity makes ! orig9 ( ! latt] f ! =m] a deep riddle2 x is ! riddle ( ! psy*ology ( ! f\nd] ( religions4 ,:at is ! diff]5ce betwe5 ! g5ius :o f\nds a religion & o!r k9ds ( g5ius8 ,:at is x t has l$ him to f\nd ! religion8 ,! ma9 diff]5ce is no o!r ?an t he did n always believe 9 ! ,god he wor%ips4 ,tradition relates ( ,buddha1 z ( ,*ri/1 t !y 7 subject to great] temptations ?an o!r m54 ,two o!rs1 ,mahomet & ,lu!r1 7 epileptic4 ,epilepsy is ! disease ( ! crim9al2 ,cs>1 ,n>ses1 ,napoleon1 ! greate/ ( ! crim9als1 7 epileptics4 ,! f\nd] ( a religion is ! man :o has liv$ )\t ,god & yet has /ruggl$ t[>ds ! greate/ fai?4 ,h[ is x possible = a bad man to trans=m himself8 ,z ,kant1 al?\gh he 0 compell$ to admit ! fact1 ask$ 9 8 8,philosophy ( ,religion10 h[ c an evil tree br+ =? good fruit8 ,! inconceivable my/]y ( ! trans=mation into a good man ( "o :o has liv$ evilly all ! days & ye>s ( 8 life has actually realis$ itself 9 ! case ( "s six or sev5 hi/orical p]sonages4 ,^! h be5 ! f\nd]s ( religions4 ,o!r m5 ( g5ius are good f _! bir?2 ! religi\s f\nd] acquires goodness4 ,! old exi/5ce ceases utt]ly & is replac$ by ! new4 ,! great] ! man1 ! m mu/ p]i% 9 him at ! reg5]ation4 ,i am incl9$ to ?9k t ,socrates1 alone among/ ! ,greeks1 approa*$ closely to ! f\nd]s ( religion2 p]haps he made ! decisive /ruggle ) evil 9 ! f\r-&-tw5ty h\rs dur+ :i* he /ood alone at ,potida4 ,! f\nd] ( a religion is ! man = :om no problem has be5 solv$ f 8 bir?4 ,he is ! man ) ! lea/ possible sur5ess ( conviction1 = :om ev]y?+ is d\btful & unc]ta91 & :o has to conqu] ev]y?+ = himself 9 ?is life4 ,"o has to /ruggle aga9/ illness & physical weakness1 ano!r trembles on ! br9k ( ! crimes :i* are possible = him1 yet ano!r has be5 9 ! bonds ( s9 f 8 bir?4 ,x is only a =mal /atem5t to say t orig9al s9 is ! same 9 all p]sons2 x diff]s mat]ially = ea* p]son4 ,"h "o1 !re ano!r1 ea* z he 0 born1 has *os5 :at is s5seless & wor?less1 has pref]r$ in/9ct to 8 w1 or pleasure to love2 only ! f\nd] ( a religion has _h orig9al s9 9 its absolute =m2 9 him ev]y?+ is d\btful1 ev]y?+ is 9 "q4 ,he has to meet e problem & free himself f all guilt4 ,he has to rea* firm gr\nd f ! deepe/ abyss2 he has to surm\nt ! no?+ness 9 him & b9d himself to ! utmo/ reality4 ,& s x may be said ( him t he frees himself ( orig9al s91 t 9 him ,god becomes man1 b also t ! man becomes ,god2 9 him 0 all error & all guilt2 9 him !re comes to be all expiation & r$emption4 ,?us ! f\nd] ( a religion is ! greate/ ( ! g5iuses1 = he has vanqui%$ ! mo/4 ,he is ! man :o has accompli%$ victori\sly :at ! deepe/ ?9k]s ( mank9d h ?\ght ( only timor\sly z a possibility1 ! complete reg5]ation ( a man1 ! rev]sal ( 8 w4 ,o!r great m5 ( g5ius h1 inde$1 to fight aga9/ evil1 b ! b5t ( _! s\ls is t[>ds ! good4 ,! f\nd] ( a religion has s mu* 9 him ( evil1 ( ! p]v]se1 ( e>?ly passion1 t he mu/ fight ) ! enemy )9 him = =ty days 9 ! wild]ness1 )\t food or sleep4 ,x 0 only ?us t he c conqu] & ov]come ! dea? )9 him & free himself = ! highe/ life4 ,7 x o!rwise !re w\ld be no impulse to f\nd a fai?4 ,! f\nd] ( a religion is ?us ! v antipodes ( ! emp]or2 emp]or & ,galilean are at ! two poles ( ?\ght4 ,9 ,napoleon's life1 also1 !re 0 a mom5t :5 a conv]sion took place2 b ?is 0 n a turn+ away f e>?ly life1 b ! delib]ate decision = ! treasure & p[] & spl5d\r ( ! e>?ly life4 ,napoleon 0 great 9 ! colossal int5sity ) :i* he flung f him all ! ideal1 all relation to ! absolute1 9 ! magnitude ( 8 guilt4 ,! f\nd] ( religion1 on ! o!r h&1 _c & w n br+ to man any?+ except t :i* 0 mo/ difficult = himself to atta91 ! reconciliation ) ,god4 ,he kn[s t he himself 0 ! man mo/ lad5 ) guilt1 & he atones = ! guilt by 8 dea? on ! cross4 ,!re 7 two possibilities 9 ,judaism4 ,be=e ! bir? ( ,*ri/1 ^! two1 negation & affirmation1 7 toge!r await+ *oice4 ,*ri/ 0 ! man :o conqu]$ 9 ,himself ,judaism1 ! greate/ negation1 & creat$ ,*ri/ianity1 ! /ronge/ affirmation & ! mo/ direct opposite ( ,judaism4 ,n[ ! *oice has be5 made2 ! old ,israel has divid$ into ,jews & ,*ri/ians1 & ,judaism has lo/ ! possibility ( produc+ greatness4 ,! new ,judaism has be5 unable to produce m5 l ,samson & ,jo%ua1 ! lea/ ,jewi% ( ! old ,jews4 ,9 ! hi/ory ( ! _w1 ,*ri/5dom & ,jewry repres5t negation & affirmation4 ,9 old ,israel !re 0 ! highe/ possibility ( mank9d1 ! possibility ( ,*ri/4 ,! o!r possibility is ! ,jew4 ,i mu/ gu>d aga9/ misconception2 ,i d n mean t !re 0 any approa* to ,*ri/ianity 9 ,judaism2 ! "o is ! absolute negation ( ! o!r2 ! relation betwe5 ! two is only t :i* exi/s betwe5 all pairs ( direct opposites4 ,ev5 m ?an 9 ! case ( piety & ,judaism1 ,judaism & ,*ri/ianity c be/ be contra/$ by :at ea* respectively excludes4 ,no?+ is easi] ?an to be ,jewi%1 no?+ s difficult z to be ,*ri/ian4 ,judaism is ! abyss ov] :i* ,*ri/ianity is erect$1 & = t reason ! ,aryan dreads no?+ s deeply z ! ,jew4 ,i am n dispos$ to believe1 ) ,*amb]la91 t ! bir? ( ! ,savi\r 9 ,pale/9e 0 an accid5t4 ,*ri/ 0 a ,jew1 precisely t ,he might ov]come ! ,judaism )9 ,him1 = he :o triumphs ov] ! deepe/ d\bt rea*es ! highe/ fai?2 he :o has rais$ himself above ! mo/ desolate negation is mo/ sure 9 8 position ( affirmation4 ,judaism 0 ! peculi>1 orig9al s9 ( ,*ri/2 x 0 ,8 victory ov] ,judaism t made ,him great] ?an ,buddha or ,confucius4 ,*ri/ 0 ! greate/ man because ,he conqu]$ ! greate/ enemy4 ,p]haps ,he 01 & w rema91 ! only ,jew to conqu] ,judaism4 ,! fir/ ( ! ,jews to become :olly ! ,*ri/ 0 also ! la/ :o made ! transition4 ,x may be1 h[ev]1 t !re /ill lies 9 ,judaism ! possibility ( produc+ a ,*ri/1 & t ! f\nd] ( ! next religion w pass ?r\gh ,jewry4 ,on no o!r supposition c we acc\nt = ! long p]si/5ce ( ! ,jewi% race :i* has outliv$ s _m o!r peoples4 ,)\t at lea/ "s vague hope1 ! ,jews c\ld n h surviv$1 & ! hope is t !re mu/ be some?+ 9 ,judaism = ,judaism2 x is ! idea ( a ,messiah1 ( "o :o %all save !m f ,judaism4 ,e o!r race has _h "s special wat*word1 &1 on realis+ _! wat*word1 !y h p]i%$4 ,! ,jews h fail$ to realise _! wat*word1 & s _! vitality p]si/s4 ,! ,jewi% nature has no o!r metaphysical mean+ ?an to be ! spr+ f :i* ! f\nd]s ( religion w come4 ,_! tradition to increase & multiply is connect$ ) ?is vague hope1 t out ( !m %all come ! ,messiah4 ,! possibility ( begett+ ,*ri/s is ! mean+ ( ,judaism4 ,z 9 ! ,jew !re are ! greate/ possibilities1 s also 9 him are ! meane/ actualities2 he is adapt$ to mo/ ?+s & realises fewe/4 ,judaism1 at ! pres5t day1 has rea*$ its highe/ po9t s9ce ! "t ( ,h]od4 ,judaism is ! _s ( mod]n life4 ,sexuality is accept$1 & contempor>y e?ics s+ ! praises ( pair+4 ,unhappy ,nietzs*e mu/ n be made responsible = ! %ameful doctr9es ( ,wilhelm ,bls*e4 ,nietzs*e himself und]/ood asceticism1 & p]haps x 0 only z a revulsion f ! evils ( 8 own asceticism t he atta*$ value to ! opposite conception4 ,x is ! ,jew & ! woman :o are ! apo/les ( pair+ to br+ guilt on humanity4 ,our age is n only ! mo/ ,jewi% b ! mo/ fem99e4 ,x is a "t :5 art is cont5t ) daubs & seeks its inspiration 9 ! sports ( animals2 ! "t ( a sup]ficial an>*y1 ) no feel+ = ,ju/ice & ! ,/ate2 a "t ( communi/ic e?ics1 ( ! mo/ fooli% ( hi/orical views1 ! mat]iali/ic int]pretation ( hi/ory2 a "t ( capitalism & ( ,m>xism2 a "t :5 hi/ory1 life1 & sci5ce are no m ?an political economy & te*nical in/ruction2 a "t :5 g5ius is suppos$ to be a =m ( madness2 a "t ) no great arti/s & no great philosoph]s2 a "t )\t orig9ality & yet ) ! mo/ fooli% crav+ = orig9ality2 a "t :5 ! cult ( ! ,virg9 has be5 replac$ by t ( ! ,demi-vi]ge4 ,x is ! "t :5 pair+ has n only be5 approv$ b has be5 enjo9$ z a duty4 ,b f ! new ,judaism ! new ,*ri/ianity may be press+ =?2 mank9d waits = ! new f\nd] ( religion1 &1 z 9 ! ye> "o1 ! age presses = a decision4 ,! decision mu/ be made betwe5 ,judaism & ,*ri/ianity1 betwe5 bus9ess & culture1 betwe5 male & female1 betwe5 ! race & ! individual1 betwe5 unwor?9ess & wor?1 betwe5 ! e>?ly & ! high] life1 betwe5 negation & ! ,god-l4 ,mank9d has ! *oice to make4 ,!re are only two poles1 & !re is no middle way4 ,,*apt] ,,xiv ,,woman ,,& ,,mank9d ,at la/ we are ready1 cle>-ey$ & well arm$1 to deal ) ! "q ( ! emancipation ( wom54 ,our eyes are cle>1 = we h fre$ !m f ! ?rong+ specks ( dubiety t _h hi!rto obscur$ ! "q1 & we are arm$ ) a well-f\nd$ grasp ( !ory1 & a secure e?ical basis4 ,we are f> f ! maze 9 :i* ?is controv]sy usually lies1 & our inve/igation has got beyond ! m]e /atem5t ( diff]5t natural capacity = m5 & wom51 to a po9t :5ce ! "p ( wom5 9 ! _w-:ole & ! mean+ ( h] relation to humanity c be e/imat$4 ,i am n go+ to deal ) any practical applications ( my results2 ! latt] are n ne>ly optimi/ic en\gh = me to hope t !y c\ld h any effect on ! progress ( political movem5ts4 ,i refra9 f work+ out laws ( social hygi5e1 & cont5t myself ) fac+ ! problem f ! /&po9t ( t conception ( humanity :i* p]vades ! philosophy ( ,immanuel ,kant4 ,?is conception is 9 great dang] f woman4 ,woman is able1 9 a q extraord9>y way1 to produce ! impression t %e h]self is really non-sexual1 & t h] sexuality is only a concession to man4 ,b be t z x may1 at ! pres5t "t m5 h almo/ all[$ !mselves to be p]suad$ by woman t _! /ronge/ & mo/ m>k$ly *>act]i/ic desire lies 9 sexuality1 t x is only ?r\gh woman t !y c hope to satisfy _! true/ & be/ ambitions1 & t *a/ity is an unnatural & impossible /ate = !m4 ,h[ (t5 x happ5s t "y m5 :o are wrapp$ up 9 _! "w are told by wom5 to :om !y appeal & :o w\ld pref] to h !m pay+ !m att5tion1 or ev5 z sons-9-law1 t 8!y ought n to "w too h>d10 t !y ought to 8enjoy life40 ,at ! bottom ( ?is sort ( advice !re lies a feel+ on ! woman's "p1 :i* is none ! less real because x is unconsci\s1 t h] :ole significance & exi/5ce dep5d on h] mission z a procreat+ ag5t1 & t %e goes to ! wall if man is all[$ to occupy himself altoge!r ) o!r ?an sexual matt]s4 ,t wom5 w ev] *ange 9 ?is respect is d\btful4 ,!re is no?+ to %[ t %e ev] 0 diff]5t4 ,x may be t to-day ! physical side ( ! "q is m to ! =e ?an =m]ly1 s9ce a great deal ( ! 8woman movem5t0 ( ! times is m]ely a desire to be 8free10 to %ake (f ! trammels ( mo!rhood2 z a :ole ! practical results %[ t x is revolt f mo!rhood t[>ds pro/itution1 a pro/itute emancipation r ?an ! emancipation ( woman t is aim$ at3 a bold bid = ! success ( ! c\rtesan4 ,! only real *ange is man's behavi\r t[>ds ! movem5t4 ,"u ! influ5ce ( mod]n ,judaism1 m5 seem incl9$ to accept woman's e/imate ( !m & to b[ be=e x4 ,mascul9e *a/ity is laugh$ at1 & ! feel+ t woman is ! evil influ5ce 9 man's life is no long] und]/ood1 & m5 are n a%am$ ( _! own lu/4 ,x is n[ app>5t f :]e ?is dem& = 8see+ life10 ! ,dionysian view ( ! music-hall1 ! cult ( ,goe! 9 s f> z he foll[s ,ovid1 & ?is q mod]n 8coitus-cult0 comes4 ,!re is no d\bt t ! movem5t is s widespread t v few m5 h ! c\rage to ackn[l$ge _! *a/ity1 pref]r+ to pret5d t !y are regul> ,don ,juans4 ,sexual excess is held to be ! mo/ desirable *>act]i/ic ( a man ( ! _w1 & sexuality has atta9$ su* pre-em95ce t a man is d\bt$ unless he c1 z x 71 %[ pro(s ( 8 pr[ess4 ,*a/ity1 on ! o!r h&1 is s despis$ t _m a really pure lad attempts to appe> a blas r\4 ,x is ev5 true t ^? :o are mode/ are a%am$ ( ! feel+2 b !re is ano!r1 ! mod]n =m ( %ame--n ! erotici/'s %ame1 b ! %ame ( ! woman :o has no lov]1 :o has n receiv$ appraisem5t f ! opposite sex4 ,h5ce x comes t m5 make x _! bus9ess to tell ea* o!r :at a "r & prop] pleasure !y take 9 8do+ _! duty0 by ! opposite sex4 ,& wom5 are c>eful to let x be kn[n t only :at is 8manly0 9 man c appeal to !m3 & man takes _! measure ( 8 manl9ess & makes x 8 own4 ,man's qualifications z a male h1 9 fact1 become id5tical ) 8 value ) wom51 9 wom5's eyes4 ,b ,god =bid t x %\ld be s2 t w\ld mean t !re are no long] any m54 ,contra/ ) ?is ! fact t ! high value set on wom5's virtue orig9at$ ) man1 & w always come f m5 wor?y ( ! "n2 x is ! projection ( man's own ideal ( spotless purity on ! object ( 8 love4 ,b !re %\ld be no mi/ak+ ?is true *a/ity = ! %iv]+ & %ak+ be=e contact1 :i* is soon *ang$ = delight$ acquiesc5ce1 nor = ! hy/]ical suppression ( sexual desires4 ,! outw>d endeav\r to correspond to man's dem& = physical purity mu/ n be tak5 = any?+ b a fe> le/ ! buy] w fight %y ( ! b>ga92 lea/ ( all ! c>e :i* wom5 s (t5 take to *oose only ! man :o c give !m mo/ value mu/ n deceive any "o 7x has be5 call$ ! 8high value0 or 8self-respect0 a girl has = h]self76 ,if "o rememb]s ! view wom5 take ( virg9ity1 !re c be v little d\bt t woman's "o end is ! br++ ab\t ( univ]sal pair+ z ! only means by :i* !y acquire a real exi/5ce2 t wom5 desire pair+1 & no?+ else1 ev5 if !y p]sonally appe> to be z un9t]e/$ z possible 9 s5sual matt]s4 ,all ?is c be fully prov$ f ! g5]ality ( ! mat*-mak+ in/9ct4 ,9 ord] to be fully p]suad$ ( ?is1 woman's attitude t[>ds ! virg9ity ( ^? ( h] own sex mu/ be consid]$4 ,x is c]ta9 t wom5 h a v l[ op9ion ( ! unm>ri$4 ,x is1 9 fact1 ! "o female condition :i* has a negative value = woman4 ,wom5 only respect a woman :5 %e is m>ri$2 ev5 if %e is unhappily m>ri$ to a hide\s1 weak1 poor1 common1 tyrannical1 8impossible0 man1 %e is1 nev]!less1 m>ri$1 has receiv$ value1 exi/5ce4 ,ev5 if a woman has _h a %ort exp]i5ce ( ! fre$om ( a c\rtesan's life1 ev5 if %e has be5 on ! /reets1 %e /ill /&s high] 9 a woman's e/imation ?an ! old maid1 :o works & toils alone 9 h] room1 )\t ev] hav+ kn[n lawful or unlawful union ) a man1 ! endur+ or fleet+ ec/asy ( love4 ,ev5 a "y & beautiful girl is nev] valu$ by a woman = h] attractions z su* 7! s5se ( ! beautiful is want+ 9 woman s9ce !y h no /&>d 9 !mselves to measure x by71 b m]ely because %e has m prospect ( enslav+ a man4 ,! m beautiful a "y girl is1 ! m promis+ %e appe>s to o!r wom51 ! great] h] value to woman z ! mat*-mak] 9 h] mission z gu>dian ( ! race2 x is only ?is unconsci\s feel+ :i* makes x possible = a woman to take pleasure 9 ! beauty ( a "y girl4 ,x goes )\t say+ t ?is c only happ5 :5 ! woman 9 "q has already a*iev$ h] own end 7because1 o!rwise1 envy ( a contempor>y1 & ! fe> ( hav+ h] own *ances jeop>dis$ by o!rs1 w\ld ov]come o!r consid]ations74 ,%e mu/ fir/ ( all atta9 h] own union1 & !n %e is ready to help o!rs4 ,wom5 are altoge!r to blame = ! unpleasant associations :i* are s un=tunately connect$ ) 8old maids40 ,"o (t5 he>s m5 talk+ respectfully ( an eld]ly woman2 b e woman & girl1 :e!r m>ri$ or s+le1 has no?+ b contempt = su* a "o1 ev5 :51 z is (t5 ! case1 !y are unconsci\s t x is s ) !m4 ,i once he>d a m>ri$ woman1 ^: tal5ts & beauty put jeal\sy q out ( ! "q1 mak+ fun ( h] pla9 & eld]ly ,italian gov]ness = repeat$ly say+ t3 8,io sono ancora una virg9e0 7t %e 0 /ill a virg974 ,! int]pretation put on ! words 0 t ! speak] wi%$ to admit %e _h made a virtue ( necessity1 & w\ld h be5 v glad to get rid ( h] virg9ity if %e c\ld h done s )\t detrim5t to h] position 9 life4 ,?is is ! mo/ important po9t ( all3 wom5 n only disp>age & despise ! virg9ity ( o!r wom51 b !y set no value on _! own /ate ( virg9ity 7except t m5 prize x s highly74 ,?is is :y !y look ^u e m>ri$ woman z a sort ( sup]ior be+4 ,! deep impression made on wom5 by ! sexual act c be mo/ pla9ly se5 by ! respect :i* girls pay to a m>ri$ woman1 ( h[ev] %ort a /&+2 :i* po9ts to _! idea ( _! exi/5ce be+ ! atta9m5t ( ! same z5i? !mselves4 ,!y look ^u o!r "y girls1 on ! contr>y1 z be+1 l !mselves1 /ill imp]fect be+s await+ consummation4 ,i ?9k ,i h said en\gh to %[ t exp]i5ce confirms ! d$uction ,i made f ! importance ( ! pair+ in/9ct 9 wom51 ! d$uction t virg9 wor%ip is ( male1 n female orig94 ,a man dem&s *a/ity 9 himself & o!rs1 mo/ ( all f ! be+ he loves2 a woman wants ! man ) mo/ exp]i5ce & s5suality1 n virtue4 ,woman has no compreh5sion ( p>agons4 ,on ! contr>y1 x is well kn[n t a woman is mo/ ready to fly to ! arms ( ! man ) ! wide/ reputation = be+ a ,don ,juan4 ,woman requires man to be sexual1 because %e only ga9s exi/5ce ?r\gh 8 sexuality4 ,wom5 h no s5se ( a man's love1 z a sup]ior ph5om5on1 !y only p]ceive t side ( him :i* unceas+ly desires & appropriates ! object ( 8 affections1 & m5 :o h none or v little ( ! in/9ct ( brutality develop$ 9 !m h no influ5ce on !m4 ,z = ! high]1 platonic love ( man1 !y d n want x2 x flatt]s & pleases !m1 b x has no significance = !m1 & if ! homage on b5d$ knees la/s too long1 ,beatrice becomes j z impati5t z ,messal9a4 ,9 coitus lies woman's greate/ humiliation1 9 love h] supreme/ exaltation4 ,s9ce woman desires coitus & n love1 %e proves t %e wi%es to be humiliat$ & n wor%ipp$4 ,! ultimate oppon5t ( ! emancipation ( wom5 is woman4 ,x is n because sexual union is voluptu\s1 n because x is ! typical example ( all ! pleasures ( ! l[] life1 t x is immoral4 ,asceticism1 :i* w\ld reg>d pleasure 9 itself z immoral1 is itself immoral1 inasmu* x attributes immorality to an action because ( ! ext]nal consequ5ces ( x1 n because ( immorality 9 ! ?+ itself2 x is ! imposition ( an ali51 n an inh]5t law4 ,a man may seek pleasure1 he may /rive to make 8 life easi] & m pleasant2 b he mu/ n sacrifice a moral law4 ,asceticism attempts to make man moral by self-repression & w give him cr$it & praise = morality simply because he has d5i$ himself c]ta9 ?+s4 ,asceticism mu/ be reject$ f ! po9t ( view ( e?ics & ( psy*ology inasmu* z x makes virtue ! effect ( a cause1 & n ! ?+ itself4 ,asceticism is a dang]\s al?\gh attractive guide2 s9ce pleasure is "o ( ! *ief ?+s t beguile m5 f ! high] pa?1 x is easy to suppose t its m]e ab&onm5t is m]itori\s4 ,9 itself1 h[ev]1 pleasure is nei!r moral nor immoral4 ,x is only :5 ! desire = pleasure conqu]s ! desire = wor?9ess t a human be+ has fall54 ,coitus is immoral because !re is no man :o does n use woman at su* times z a means to an end2 = :om pleasure does n1 9 8 own z well z h] be+1 dur+ t "t repres5t ! value ( mank9d4 ,dur+ coitus a man =gets all ab\t ev]y?+1 he =gets ! woman2 %e has no long] a psy*ic b only a physical exi/5ce = him4 ,he ei!r desires a *ild by h] or ! satisfaction ( 8 own passion2 9 nei!r case does he use h] z an end 9 h]self1 b = an outside cause4 ,?is & ?is alone makes coitus immoral4 ,!re is no d\bt t woman is ! mission>y ( sexual union1 & t %e looks ^u h]self1 z on ev]y?+ else1 m]ely z a means to its ends4 ,%e wants a man to satisfy h] passion or to obta9 *ildr52 %e is will+ to be us$ by man z a tool1 z a ?+1 z an object1 to be treat$ z 8 prop]ty1 to be *ang$ & modell$ accord+ to 8 good pleasure4 ,b we %\ld n all[ ourselves to be us$ by o!rs z means to an end4 ,kundry appeal$ (t5 to ,p>sifal's compassion = h] ye>n+s3 b "h we see ! weakness ( sympa!tic morality1 :i* attempts to grant e desire ( ^? ar\nd1 h[ev] wrong su* wi%es may be4 ,e?ics & morality bas$ on sympa?y are equally absurd1 s9ce !y make ! 8ought0 dep5d5t on ! 8w10 7:e!r x be ! w ( oneself1 or ( o!rs1 or ( society1 x is all ! same17 in/ead ( mak+ ! 8w0 dep5d5t on ! 8ought02 !y take z a /&>d ( morality concrete cases ( human hi/ory1 concrete cases ( human happ9ess1 concrete mom5ts 9 life in/ead ( ! idea4 ,b ! "q is3 h[ ought man to treat woman8 ,z %e h]self desires to be treat$ or z ! moral idea w\ld dictate8 ,if he is go+ to treat h] z %e wi%es1 he mu/ h int]c\rse ) h]1 = %e desires x2 he mu/ beat h]1 = %e likes to be hurt2 he mu/ hypnotise h]1 s9ce %e wi%es to be hypnotis$2 he mu/ prove to h] by 8 att5tions h[ little he ?9ks ( himself1 = %e likes complim5ts1 & has no desire to be respect$ = h]self4 ,if he is go+ to treat h] z ! moral idea dem&s1 he mu/ try to see 9 h] ! concept ( mank9d & endeav\r to respect h]4 ,ev5 al?\gh woman is only a function ( man1 a function he c degrade or raise at w1 & wom5 d n wi% to be m or any?+ else ?an :at man makes !m1 x is no m a moral arrangem5t ?an ! suttee ( ,indian wid[s1 :i*1 ev5 ?\gh x be volunt>y & insi/$ ^u by !m1 is none ! less t]rible b>b>ity4 ,! emancipation ( woman is analog\s to ! emancipation ( ,jews & negroes4 ,und\bt$ly ! pr9cipal reason :y ^! p h be5 treat$ z slaves & inf]iors is to be f\nd 9 _! s]vile dispositions2 _! desire = fre$om is n ne>ly s /rong z t ( ! ,indo-,g]mans4 ,& ev5 al?\gh ! :ites 9 ,am]ica at ! pres5t day f9d x necess>y to keep !mselves q alo( f ! negro population because !y make su* a bad use ( _! fre$om1 yet 9 ! w> ( ! ,nor!rn ,/ates aga9/ ! ,f$]als1 :i* result$ 9 ! fre$om ( ! slaves1 "r 0 entirely on ! side ( ! emancipators4 ,al?\gh ! humanity ( ,jews1 negroes1 & /ill m ( wom51 is weigh$ d[n by _m immoral impulses2 al?\gh 9 ^! cases !re is s mu* m to fight aga9/ ?an 9 ! case ( ,aryan m51 /ill we mu/ try to respect mank9d1 & to v5]ate ! idea ( humanity 7by :i* ,i d n mean ! human community1 b ! be+1 man1 ! s\l z "p ( ! spiritual _w74 ,no matt] h[ degrad$ a crim9al may be1 no "o ought to arrogate to himself ! functions ( ! law2 no man has ! "r to lyn* su* an (f5d]4 ,! problem ( woman & ! problem ( ! ,jews are absolutely id5tical ) ! problem ( slav]y1 & !y mu/ be solv$ 9 ! same way4 ,no "o %\ld be oppress$1 ev5 if ! oppression is ( su* a k9d z to be unfelt z su*4 ,! animals ab\t a h\se are n 8slaves10 because !y h no fre$om 9 ! prop] s5se ( ! ^w :i* c\ld be tak5 away4 ,b woman has a fa9t idea ( h] incapacity1 a la/ remnant1 h[ev] weak1 ( ! free intelligible ego1 simply because !re is no su* ?+ z an absolute woman4 ,wom5 are human be+s1 & mu/ be treat$ z su*1 ev5 if !y !mselves d n wi% x4 ,woman & man h ! same rights4 ,t is n to say t wom5 ought to h an equal %>e 9 political affairs4 ,f ! utilit>ian /&po9t su* a concession1 c]ta9ly at pres5t & probably always1 w\ld be mo/ undesirable2 9 ,new ,zeal&1 :]e1 on e?ical pr9ciples1 wom5 h be5 enfran*is$1 ! wor/ results h foll[$4 ,z *ildr51 imbeciles & crim9als w\ld be ju/ly prev5t$ f tak+ any "p 9 public affairs ev5 if !y 7 num]ically equal or 9 ! majority2 woman mu/ 9 ! same way be kept f hav+ a %>e 9 any?+ :i* conc]ns ! public welf>e1 z x is mu* to be fe>$ t ! m]e effect ( female influ5ce w\ld be h>mful4 ,j z ! results ( sci5ce d n dep5d on :e!r all m5 accept !m or n1 s ju/ice & inju/ice c be dealt out to ! woman1 al?\gh %e is unable to di/+ui% betwe5 !m1 & %e ne$ n be afraid t injury w be done h]1 z ju/ice & n might w be ! decid+ factor 9 h] treatm5t4 ,b ju/ice is always ! same :e!r = man or woman4 ,no "o has a "r to =bid ?+s to a woman because !y are 8unwomanly02 nei!r %\ld any man be s mean z to talk ( 8 unfai?ful wife's do+s z if !y 7 8 affair4 ,woman mu/ be look$ ^u z an individual & z if %e 7 a free individual1 n z "o ( a species1 n z a sort ( creation f ! v>i\s wants ( man's nature2 ev5 ?\gh woman h]self may nev] prove wor?y ( su* a l(ty view4 ,?us ?is book may be consid]$ z ! greate/ hon\r ev] paid to wom54 ,no?+ b ! mo/ moral relation t[>ds wom5 %\ld be possible = m52 !re %\ld be nei!r sexuality nor love1 = bo? make woman ! means to an end1 b only ! attempt to und]/& h]4 ,mo/ m5 !oretically respect wom51 b practically !y ?or\ghly despise !m2 accord+ to my ideas ?is me?od %\ld be rev]s$4 ,x is impossible to ?9k highly ( wom51 b x does n foll[ t we are to despise !m = ev]4 ,x is un=tunate t s _m great & fam\s m5 h _h mean views on ?is po9t4 ,! views ( ,s*op5hau] & ,demo/h5es z to ! emancipation ( wom5 are good in/ances4 ,s also ,goe!'s ,imm] is s das ,md*5 bes*ftigt und reifet im /ill5 ,husli*] ,tug5d entgeg51 d5 klug5 ,mann zu beglck54 ,wns*t sie dann endli* zu les51 s whlt sie gewissli* e9 ,ko*bu*1 is sc>cely bett] ?an ,molire's 444 ,une femme en sait t\j\rs assez1 ,qu& la capacit de son esprit se hausse ,a connatre un p\rpo9t d'avec un haut de *ausse4 ,m5 w h to ov]come _! dislike = mascul9e wom51 = t is no m ?an a mean egoism4 ,if wom5 ev] become mascul9e by becom+ logical & e?ical1 !y w\ld no long] be su* good mat]ial = man's projection2 b t is n a suffici5t reason = ! pres5t me?od ( ty+ woman d[n to ! ne$s ( h] husb& & *ildr5 & =bidd+ h] c]ta9 ?+s because !y are mascul9e4 ,= ev5 if ! possibility ( morality is incompatible ) ! idea ( ! absolute woman1 x does n foll[ t man is to make no ef=t to save ! av]age woman f fur!r det]ioration2 mu* less is he to help to keep woman z %e is4 ,9 e liv+ woman ! pres5ce ( :at ,kant calls 8! g]m ( good0 mu/ be assum$2 x is ! remnant ( a free /ate :i* makes x possible = woman to h a dim notion ( h] de/9y4 ,! !oretical possibility ( graft+ mu* m on ?is 8g]m ( good0 %\ld nev] be lo/ sight (1 ev5 al?\gh no?+ has ev] be5 done1 or ev5 if no?+ c\ld ev] be done 9 t respect4 ,! basis & ! purpose ( ! univ]se is ! good1 & ! :ole _w exi/s "u a moral law2 ev5 to ! animals1 :i* are m]e ph5om5a1 we assign moral values1 hold+ ! elephant1 = in/ance1 to be high] ?an ! snake1 not)/&+ ! fact t we d n make an animal acc\ntable :5 x kills ano!r4 ,9 ! case ( woman1 h[ev]1 we reg>d h] z responsible if %e commits murd]1 & 9 ?is alone is a pro( t wom5 are above ! animals4 ,if x be ! case t womanl9ess is simply immorality1 !n woman mu/ cease to be womanly & try to be manly4 ,i mu/ give w>n+ aga9/ ! dang] ( woman try+ m]ely to lik5 h]self outw>dly to man1 = su* a c\rse w\ld simply plunge h] m deeply into womanl9ess4 ,x is only too likely t ! ef=ts to emancipate wom5 w result n 9 giv+ h] real fre$om1 9 lett+ h] rea* free-w1 b m]ely 9 enl>g+ ! range ( h] caprices4 ,x seems to me t if we look ! facts ( ! case 9 ! face !re are only two possible c\rses op5 = wom53 ei!r to pret5d to accept man's ideas1 & to ?9k t !y believe :at is really oppos$ to _! :ole1 un*ang$ nature1 to assume a horror ( immorality 7z if !y 7 moral !mselves71 ( sexuality 7z if !y desir$ platonic love72 or to op5ly admit t !y are wrapp$ up 9 husb& & *ildr51 )\t be+ consci\s ( all t su* an admission implies1 ( ! %amelessness & self-immolation ( x4 ,unconsci\s hypocrisy1 or cynical id5tification ) _! natural in/9cts2 no?+ else seems possible = woman4 ,b x is nei!r agreem5t nor disagreem5t )1 b r ! d5ial & ov]com+ ( h] womani%ness t a woman %\ld aim at4 ,if a woman really 7 to wi%1 = in/ance1 = man's *a/ity1 x w\ld mean t %e _h conqu]$ ! woman 9 h]1 x w\ld mean t pair+ 0 no long] ( supreme importance to h] & t h] aim 0 no long] to fur!r x4 ,b "h is ! tr\ble3 su* pret5sions mu/ n be accept$ z g5u9e1 ev5 al?\gh "h & !re !y are actually put =w>d4 ,= a woman :o long$ = man's purity is1 ap>t f h] hy/]ia1 s /upid & s incapable ( tru?fulness t %e is unable to p]ceive t %e is 9 ?is way negat+ h]self1 mak+ h]self absolutely wor?less1 )\t exi/5ce6 ,x is difficult to decide :i* is pref]able3 ! unlimit$ hypocrisy :i* c appropriate ! ?+ t is mo/ =eign to x1 i4e41 ! ascetic ideal1 or ! +5u\s admiration = ! re=m$ rake1 ! complac5t devotion to him4 ,! pr9cipal problem ( ! woman "q lies 9 ! fact t 9 ea* case woman's "o desire is to put all responsibility on man1 & 9 ?is x is id5tical ) ! problem ( mank9d4 ,fri$ri* ,nietzs*e says 9 "o ( 8 books3 8,to und]e/imate ! real difficulties ( ! man & woman problem1 to fail to admit ! abysmal antagonism & ! inevitable nature ( ! con/ant /ra9 betwe5 ! two1 to dream ( equal rights1 education1 responsibilities & duties1 is ! m>k ( ! sup]ficial obs]v]1 & any ?9k] :o has be5 f\nd %all[ 9 ^! difficult places--%all[ by nature--%\ld be look$ ^u z untru/wor?y1 z a useless & trea*]\s guide2 he w1 no d\bt1 be "o ( ^? :o #8briefly deal )' all ! real problems ( life1 dea? & et]nity--:o nev] gets to ! bottom ( ?+s4 ,b ! man :o is n sup]ficial1 :o has dep? ( ?\ght z well z ( purpose1 ! dep? :i* n only makes him desire "r b end[s him ) det]m9ation & /r5g? to d "r1 mu/ always look on woman f ! ori5tal /&po9t3--z a possession1 z private prop]ty1 z some?+ born to s]ve & be dep5d5t on him--he mu/ see ! m>vell\s reasonabl5ess ( ! ,asiatic in/9ct ( sup]iority ov] wom51 z ! ,greeks ( old saw x1 ^? wor?y successors & disciples ( ! ,ea/]n s*ool4 ,x 0 an attitude t[>ds woman :i*1 z is well kn[n1 f ,hom]'s "t till t ( ,p]icles1 grew ) ! gr[? ( culture1 & increas$ 9 /r5g? /ep by /ep1 & gradually became q ori5tal4 ,:at a necess>y1 logical1 desirable gr[? = mank9d6 if we c\ld only atta9 to x ourselves60 ,! great individuali/ is "h ?9k+ 9 ! t]ms ( social e?ics1 & ! autonomy ( 8 moral doctr9e is ov]%ad[$ by ! ideas ( ca/e1 gr\ps1 & divisions4 ,& s1 = ! b5efit ( society1 to pres]ve ! place ( m51 he w\ld place woman 9 subjection1 s t ! voice ( ! wi% = emancipation c\ld no long] be he>d1 & s t we might be fre$ f ! false & fooli% cry ( ! exi/+ advocates ( wom5's rights1 advocates :o h no suspicion ( ! real s\rce ( woman bondage4 ,b ,i quot$ ,nietzs*e1 n to convict him ( want ( logic1 b to lead to ! po9t t ! solution ( ! problem ( humanity is b\nd up ) ! solution ( ! woman problem4 ,if any "o %\ld ?9k x a high-fl[n idea t man %\ld respect woman z an entity1 a real exi/5ce1 & n use h] m]ely z a means to an end1 t he %\ld recognise 9 h] ! same rights & ! same duties 7^? ( build+ up "o's own moral p]sonality7 z 8 own1 !n he mu/ reflect t man _c solve ! e?ical problem 9 8 own case1 if he cont9ues to l[] ! idea ( humanity 9 ! wom5 by us+ h] simply = 8 own purposes4 ,coitus is ! price man has to pay to wom51 "u ! ,asiatic sy/em1 = _! oppression4 ,& al?\gh x is true t wom5 may be m ?an cont5t ) su* recomp5ce = ! wor/ =m ( slav]y1 man has no "r to take "p 9 su* conduct1 simply because he also is morally damag$ by x4 ,ev5 te*nically ! problem ( humanity is n soluble = man alone2 he has to consid] woman ev5 if he only wi%es to r$eem himself2 he mu/ endeav\r to get h] to ab&on h] immoral designs on him4 ,wom5 mu/ really & truly & spontane\sly rel9qui% coitus4 ,t und\bt$ly means t woman1 z woman1 mu/ disappe>1 & until t has come to pass !re is no possibility ( e/abli%+ ! k+dom ( ,god on e>?4 ,py?agoras1 ,plato1 ,*ri/ianity 7z oppos$ to ,judaism71 ,t]tullian1 ,swift1 ,wagn]1 ,ibs51 all ^! h urg$ ! fre$om ( woman1 n ! emancipation ( woman f man1 b r ! emancipation ( woman f h]self4 ,x is easy to be> ,nietzs*e's ana!ma 9 su* company6 ,b x is v h>d = woman to rea* su* a goal by h] own /r5g?4 ,! sp>k 9 h] is s flick]+ t x always ne$s ! fire ( man to relight x2 %e mu/ h an example to g by4 ,*ri/ is an example2 ,he fre$ ! fall5 ,magdal51 ,he swept away h] pa/ & expiat$ x = h]4 ,wagn]1 ! greate/ man s9ce ,*ri/'s "t1 und]/ood to ! full ! real significance ( t act3 until woman ceases to exi/ z woman = man %e _c cease be+ woman4 ,kundry c\ld only be releas$ f ,kl+sor's curse by ! help ( a s9less1 immaculate man--,p>sifal4 ,?is %[s ! complete h>mony betwe5 ! psy*ological & philosophical d$uction :i* is dealt ) 9 ,wagn]'s 8,p>sifal10 ! greate/ "w 9 ! _w's lit]ature4 ,x is man's sexuality :i* fir/ gives woman exi/5ce z woman4 ,woman w exi/ z long z man's guilt is inexpiat$1 until he has really vanqui%$ 8 own sexuality4 ,x is only 9 ?is way t ! et]nal opposition to all anti-fem9i/ic t5d5cies c be avoid$2 ! view t says1 s9ce woman is !re1 be+ :at %e is1 & n to be alt]$1 man mu/ endeav\r to make t]ms ) h]2 x is useless to fight1 because !re is no?+ :i* c be ext]m9at$4 ,b x has be5 %[n t woman is negative & ceases to exi/ ! mom5t man det]m9es to be no?+ b true exi/5ce4 ,t :i* mu/ be f\ght aga9/ is n an affair ( ev] un*angeable exi/5ce & ess5ce3 x is some?+ :i* c be put an end to1 & :i* ought to be put an end to4 99 99 99 99 99 ,?is is ! way1 & no o!r1 to solve ! woman "q1 & ?is comes f compreh5d+ x4 ,! solution may appe> impossible1 its tone exagg]at$1 its claims ov]/at$1 its requirem5ts too exact+4 ,und\bt$ly !re has be5 little said ab\t ! woman "q1 z wom5 talk ( x2 we h be5 deal+ ) a subject on :i* wom5 are sil5t1 & mu/ always rema9 sil5t--! bondage :i* sexuality implies4 ,?is woman "q is z old z sex itself1 & z "y z mank9d4 ,& ! answ] to x8 ,man mu/ free himself ( sex1 = 9 t way1 & t way alone1 c he free woman4 ,9 8 purity1 n1 z %e believes1 9 8 impurity1 lies h] salvation4 ,%e mu/ c]ta9ly be de/roy$1 z woman2 b only to be rais$ aga9 f ! a%es--new1 re/or$ to y\?--z a real human be+4 ,s long z !re are two sexes !re w always be a woman "q1 j z !re w be ! problem ( mank9d4 ,*ri/ 0 m9dful ( ?is :51 accord+ to ! acc\nt ( "o ( ! ,fa!rs ( ! ,*ur*--,clem5s--,he talk$ ) ,salome1 )\t ! optimi/ic palliation ( ! sex :i* ,/4 ,paul & ,lu!r inv5t$ lat]3 dea? w la/ s long z wom5 br+ =?1 & tru? w n prevail until ! two become "o1 until f man & woman a ?ird self1 nei!r man nor woman1 is evolv$4 99 99 99 99 99 ,n[ = ! fir/ "t1 look+ at ! woman "q z ! mo/ important problem ( mank9d1 ! dem& = ! sexual ab/95ce on ! "p ( bo? sexes is put =w>d ) good reason4 ,to seek to gr\nd ?is claim on ! prejudicial effects on ! heal? foll[+ sexual int]c\rse w\ld be absurd1 = any "o ) k ( ! physical frame c\ld upset su* a !ory at all po9ts2 to f\nd x on ! immorality ( passion w\ld also be wrong1 because t w\ld introduce a het]onom\s motive into e?ics4 ,/4 ,augu/9e1 h[ev]1 mu/ c]ta9ly h be5 aw>e1 :5 he advocat$ *a/ity = all mank9d1 t ! objection rais$ to x w\ld be t 9 su* a case ! :ole human race w\ld quickly disappe> f ! face ( ! e>?4 ,?is extraord9>y appreh5sion1 ! wor/ "p ( :i* appe>s to be ! ?\ght t ! race w\ld be ext]m9at$1 %[s n only ! greate/ unbelief 9 individual immortality & et]nal life = moral well-do]s2 x is n only mo/ irreligi\s1 b x proves at ! same "t ! c[>dice ( man & 8 incapacity to live an individual life4 ,to any "o :o ?9ks ?us1 ! e>? c only mean ! turmoil & press ( ^? on x2 dea? mu/ seem less t]rible to su* a man ?an isolation4 ,if ! immortal1 moral "p ( 8 p]sonality 7 really vigor\s1 he w\ld h c\rage to look ?is result 9 ! face2 he w\ld n fe> ! dea? ( ! body1 nor attempt to sub/itute ! mis]able c]ta9ty ( ! cont9uation ( ! race = 8 lack ( fai? 9 ! et]nal life ( ! s\l4 ,! rejection ( sexuality is m]ely ! dea? ( ! physical life1 to put 9 its place ! full developm5t ( ! spiritual life4 ,h5ce x foll[s t x _c be a moral duty to provide = ! cont9uance ( ! race4 ,?is common argum5t appe>s to me to be s extraord9>ily false t ,i am almo/ a%am$ to meet x4 ,yet at ! risk ( mak+ myself ridicul\s ,i mu/ ask if any "o ev] consummat$ coitus to avoid ! great dang] ( lett+ ! human race die out1 if he fail$ 9 8 duty8 ,& w\ld x n foll[ t any man :o pref]s *a/ity w\ld be op5 to ! *>ge ( immoral conduct8 ,e =m ( fecundity is loa?some1 & no "o :o is hone/ ) himself feels b\nd to provide = ! cont9uity ( ! human race4 ,& :at we d n realise to be a duty1 is n a duty4 ,on ! contr>y1 x is immoral to procreate a human be+ = any second>y reason1 to br+ a be+ into ! limitations ( humanity1 ! conditions made = him by 8 p>5tage2 ! fundam5tal reason :y ! possible fre$om & spontaneity ( a human be+ is limit$ is t he 0 begott5 9 su* an immoral fa%ion4 ,t ! human race %\ld p]si/ is ( no int]e/ :atev] to reason2 he :o w\ld p]petuate humanity w\ld p]petuate ! problem & ! guilt1 ! only problem & ! only guilt4 ,! only true goal is div9ity & ! union ( humanity ) ! ,godhead2 t is ! real *oice betwe5 good & evil1 betwe5 exi/5ce & negation4 ,! moral sanction t has be5 inv5t$ = coitus1 9 suppos+ t !re is an ideal attitude to ! act 9 :i* only ! propagation ( ! race is ?\ght (1 is no suffici5t def5ce4 ,!re is no su* imp]ative 9 ! m9d ( man2 x is m]ely an +5i\s def5ce ( a desire1 & !re is ! fundam5tal immorality 9 x1 t ! be+ to be creat$ has no p[] ( *oice ) reg>d to 8 p>5ts4 ,z = ! sexual union 9 :i* ! production ( *ildr5 is prev5t$1 !re is no possible ju/ification4 ,sexual union has no place 9 ! idea ( mank9d1 n because ascetism is a duty1 b because 9 x woman becomes ! object1 ! cause1 & man does :at he w ) h]1 looks ^u h] m]ely z a 8?+10 n z a liv+ human be+ ) an inn]1 psy*ic1 exi/5ce4 ,& s man despises woman ! mom5t coitus is ov]1 & ! woman kn[s t %e is despis$1 ev5 al?\gh a few m9utes be=e %e ?\ght h]self ador$4 ,! only ?+ to be respect$ 9 man is ! idea ( mank9d2 ?is disp>agem5t ( woman 7& himself71 induc$ by coitus1 is ! sure/ pro( t x is oppos$ to t idea ( mank9d4 ,any "o :o is ignorant ( :at ?is ,kantian 8idea ( mank9d0 means1 may p]haps und]/& x :5 he ?9ks ( 8 si/]s1 8 "m1 8 female relatives2 x conc]ns !m all3 = our own sakes1 !n1 woman ought to treat$ z human1 respect$ & n degrad$1 all sexuality imply+ degradation4 ,b man c only respect woman :5 %e h]self ceases to wi% to be object & mat]ial = man2 if !re is any "q ( emancipation x %\ld be ! emancipation f ! pro/itute elem5t4 ,x has nev] until n[ be5 made cle> :]e ! bondage ( woman lies2 x is 9 ! sov]eign1 all too welcome p[] wield$ on !m by ! ,phallus4 ,!re c be no d\bt t ! m5 :o h really desir$ ! emancipation ( wom5 are ! m5 :o are n v sexual1 :o h no great crav+ = love1 :o are n v pr(\nd1 b :o are m5 ( noble & spiritual m9ds4 ,i am n go+ to try to palliate ! erotic motives ( man1 nor to repres5t 8 antipa?y to ! 8emancipat$ woman0 z be+ 9 any s5se less ?an x is2 x is mu* easi] to g ) ! majority1 ?an1 z ,kant did1 to climb1 pa9fully & sl[ly1 to ! heights ( isolation4 ,b a great deal ( :at is tak5 = enmity to emancipation is due to ! want ( confid5ce 9 its possibility4 ,man does n really want woman z a slave3 he is usually only too anxi\s = a companion4 ,! education :i* ! woman ( ! pres5t day receives is n calculat$ to fit h] = ! battle aga9/ h] real bondage4 ,! la/ res\rce ( h] 8womanly0 tea*]1 if %e decl9es to d ?is or t1 is to say t no man w h h] unless %e does x4 ,wom5's education is direct$ solely to prep>+ !m = _! m>riage1 ! happy /ate 9 :i* !y are to f9d _! cr[n4 ,su* tra9+ w\ld h little effect on man1 b x s]ves to acc5tuate woman's womani%ness1 h] dep5d5ce1 & h] s]vile condition4 ,! education ( woman mu/ be tak5 out ( ! h&s ( woman2 ! education ( mank9d mu/ be tak5 out ( ! h&s ( ! "m4 ,?is is ! fir/ /ep t[>ds plac+ woman 9 a relation to ! idea ( mank9d1 :i* s9ce ! beg9n+ %e has done m ?an any?+ else to h9d]4 99 99 99 99 99 ,a woman :o _h really giv5 up h] sexual self1 :o wi%$ to be at peace w\ld be no long] 8woman40 ,%e w\ld h ceas$ to be 8woman10 %e w\ld h receiv$ ! inw>d & spiritual sign z well z ! outw>d =m ( reg5]ation4 ,c su* a ?+ be8 ,!re is no absolute woman1 b ev5 s to say 8yes0 to ! above "q is l giv+ "o's ass5t to a miracle4 ,emancipation w n make woman happi]2 x w n ensure h] salvation1 & x is a long road :i* leads to ,god4 ,no be+ 9 ! transition /age betwe5 fre$om & slav]y c be happy4 ,b w woman *oose to ab&on slav]y 9 ord] to become unhappy8 ,! "q is n m]ely if x be possible = woman to become moral4 ,x is ?is3 is x possible = woman really to wi% to realise ! problem ( exi/5ce1 ! conception ( guilt8 ,c %e really desire fre$om8 ,?is c happ5 only by h] be+ p5etrat$ by an ideal1 br\ght to ! guid+ />4 ,x c happ5 only if ! categorical imp]ative 7 to become active 9 woman2 only if woman c place h]self 9 relation to ! moral idea1 ! idea ( humanity4 ,9 t way only c !re be an emancipation ( woman4 ,,index /hetics & ,erotics1 ,*ap4 ,,xi41 #bcf-bea ,aff9ity1 sexual1 comp>$ ) *emical1 #da ,ahriman1 #ahc ,alcmon1 ( ,kroton1 #ha ,alex&] ! ,great1 #bbi ,amphibia1 h]maphroditism1 #bb ,an/hesia1 sexual1 #bgd ,anatomical di/9ctions ( ! sexes1 #c ,anatomy1 z guide to sexuality1 #c1 #d ,animals1 wom5 & ! sexual union (1 #beg ,angelo1 ,m41 #aje ,anti-,*ri/1 #ahc ,antisemitism1 #cjc1 #cjd1 #cab ,appreh5sion1 #aaf ,ar*itecture1 #aai ,ari/otle1 #ah1 #adj1 #ahg1 #bic ,arrh5oplasm1 ,*ap4 ,,ii41 #aa-be ,aryans1 #cjb ,asceticism1 #cbi1 #ccf1 #cdg ,attraction1 betwe5 ! sexes1 #bf1 #bg ,autobiography1 #abb ,av5>ius1 #ca1 #hb1 #id1 #ajj1 #abh1 #add1 #cbb ,ba*1 #ajc1 #cbc ,ba*elors1 & wom51 #beh ,bacon1 #ahb ,ba%kirtseff1 ,m>ie1 #fi ,bateson1 on dimorphic e>wigs1 #cd ,beatrice1 #bdj1 #ccf ,beauty1 analysis (1 #bdj1 #bdb ,bee?ov51 #if1 #aab1 #cag ,b5?am1 #agf1 #cag ,b]keley1 #ada1 #cag ,bisexuality1 oscillations 91 #ee ,bis*(f1 #ab1 #bag ,bjrnson1 #ajh ,blavatsky1 ,mdme41 #fh ,bl9dness1 col\r1 #aaj ,blood1 transfusion (1 #bj ,bls*e1 #cbi ,bonheur1 ,rosa1 #fh ,bonnet1 #adc ,boys & girls1 education (1 #eh ,bre$+1 application ( laws ( sexual attraction to1 #dc ,breu]1 on hy/]ia1 #bfe1 #bfi1 #bgj ,bridgman1 ,laura1 #ff ,brnnhilde1 #bbc ,bruno1 #ada1 #bdj1 #caf ,bu*n]1 #cae ,buddha1 #cbe1 #cbh ,burckh>dt1 #gb ,burns1 ,rob]t1 #cag ,byron1 ,"l1 #bcf ,cs>1 #acd1 #bbi1 #bcj1 #cbf ,c>lyle1 #aac1 #acf1 #adj1 #age1 #bbi1 #cjg1 #cag ,ca/ration1 effect (1 #ah ,ca?>sis1 #bfi ,ca!r9e ,,ii4 ( ,russia1 #ff ,ca?olic view ( m>riage1 #bba ,ca?olicism & wom51 #bjg ,cattle1 homosexuality 91 #di ,causality1 inv5t$ by man1 #bgi ,cells1 sexuality (1 #ae1 #ag1 #bb1 #bc ,c]es1 #bbd ,*amb]la9 on ,jews1 #cab1 #cba1 #cbc1 #cbh on orig9 ( ,*ri/ianity1 #cbh 8,"*0 ( ,av5>ius1 #id1 #ie1 #if ,*>act]ology1 ,*ap4 ,v41 #eb-fc ,*>act]s1 classification (1 #ad second>y sexual1 #dc ,*a/ity1 #cca1 #ccb1 #ccd1 #cce1 #cda1 #cdf ,*emi/ry1 ,kepl]'s e/imate (1 #cae ,*emotropism1 #ci1 #da ,*ild1 relation ( "m & pro/itute to1 #bai ,*9ese1 #ahg1 #cjb ,*ivalry1 #bjd ,*op91 #fg ,*ri/1 #cac1 #cbe1 #cbi ,*ri/ianity & ,judaism1 #cbe1 #cbg1 #cbh ,clairvoyance1 #bgg ,classification1 #ig ,clem5s1 #cde ,cleopatra1 #bcj ,coitus1 #ccb1 #ccg1 #cdc ,col\r bl9dness1 #aaj ,comm]ce1 & ,jews1 #cbe ,communism1 #cjg ,comp>isons1 9 poetry1 #aah ,compassion1 womanly1 #aig ,complim5ts1 & wom51 #bjc ,compreh5sion1 p[] ( by g5ius1 #aje ,comte1 ,a41 #ada1 #bjd1 #bdd ,confucius1 #cbh ,consci\sness1 male & female1 ,*ap4 ,,iii41 #ic-ajb ,conv5tions1 wom5 &1 #bfb1 #bfc ,conv]sion1 ,jews &1 #cbc ,cop]nicus1 #adj1 #cae ,coquetry1 & sexuality1 #bcb ,correlations1 importance (1 #fa ,cromwell1 #bbi ,cru/acea1 h]maphroditism 91 #ai ,cuvi]1 #fa1 #fb1 #cae ,cyrano de ,b]g]ac1 #baa ,dane1 #bca ,dante1 #bdi1 #bii ,d>w91 #ig1 #acj1 #adj1 #bag on correlation1 #fa on female tal5t1 #ga on het]o/ylism1 #cc1 #cd on sexual ta/es ( animals1 #bg on union ( ^? ak91 #dd ,da ,v9ci1 #ig ,dea?1 #cdf ,dea?1 consci\sness at1 #abh1 #abi ,de ,b]g]ac1 #baa ,decalogue1 #cac ,demet]1 #bbd ,demo/h5es1 #cdj ,desc>tes1 #adi ,det]m9ants1 9 psy*ology1 #ha ,det]m9ation ( sex1 #bc ,de ,vries1 on cell *>act]s1 #af ,dil!y1 #hb ,dimorphism1 sexual1 #f ,divorce1 #bba ,don ,juan1 #ij1 #bcc1 #bii1 #ccb1 #cce ,doppelgang]1 #baj ,draw+1 & wom51 #abj ,dualism ( ! _w1 #aff ,dr]1 #cbb ,eckh>d1 #cac ,education1 #eg ( ! race1 #cdh ( wom51 #cdh ,ego1 awak5+ (1 #afd ,ego1 conception (1 ,*ap4 ,,vii41 #aec-afb 8,elective ,aff9ities10 #fi1 #bah 8,elem5t0 ( ,av5>ius1 #id ,eliot1 ,george1 #fg ,emancipation ( ,wom51 ,*ap4 ,,vi41 #fd-ge1 #cch ,embryoes1 sexual diff]5tiation (1 #e ,em]son1 #ada1 #bcj ,emp$ocles1 #agb ,emp]ors & g5ius1 #aci ,empiricism1 & ,engli% philosophy1 #cag ,engli% philosophy1 #aec ,engli% & ,jew comp>$1 #cag1 #cai ,erotics1 & /hetics1 ,*ap4 ,,xi41 #bcf-bea ,eroticism & hum\r1 #cah ,e?ics & ,logic1 ,*ap4 ,,vi41 #adb-aeb1 ,*ap4 ,,vii41 #aec-afb ,eul]1 #cae ,euripides1 #aje1 #ahg ,exn]1 #ih ,fai?fulness1 sexual1 #bbj ,falk5b]g1 on f]tilisation 9 seawe$s1 #dj ,fall1 mean+ (1 #bhc ,famili>ity1 quality (1 #add ,family1 orig9 (1 #bje among/ ! ,jews1 #caj ,f>aday1 #cae ,fe*n]1 #hb1 #bib1 #cac1 #cbb ,female1 contra/$ ) male1 ,*ap4 ,i41 #gi-hd ,fr1 on sexual inv]sion1 #de ,f]ns1 sexual attraction caus$ by malic acid1 #ci ,f]tility1 limit$ 9 pro/itutes1 #baf ,feu]ba*1 #ada1 #cje ,fi*te1 #adj1 #aej1 #cjg ,fis*>t1 #bbf ,fl[]s1 het]o/yl\s1 #cc1 #cd ,=gett+1 analysis ( process1 #ig ,=m1 matt] & =m1 #bic ,=mula1 ( sexual attraction1 #bi1 #cg1 #ch ( sexual con/itution1 #h ,f\qu1 #ahh ,free love1 #bba ,free w1 #bji ,freud1 on hy/]ia1 #bfe-bgg ,fri5d%ip1 #di1 #bhh ,galileo1 #adj1 #cae ,gall1 on physiognomy1 #ei ,gauss1 #adj ,gaule1 #ab ,g5esis1 ,book (1 #bie ,g5ital1 gl&s1 effect ( transplantation1 #ba ,g5ius1 comp>$ ) tal5t1 ,*ap4 ,,iv41 #ajc-aac & ! ,ego1 ,*ap4 ,,viii41 #afc-ahe 9 evolution ( race1 #acg & language1 #acg & mal5ess1 #aac & memory1 ,*ap4 ,v41 #aad-ada & morality1 #ahc & "t1 #acf summ>y (1 #afi1 #ahb1 #ahc ,g]ma91 ,sophie1 #aid ,girls & boys1 education (1 #eh ,god1 ,s*op5hau]'s def9ition1 #cac ,goe!1 #dj1 #da1 #dc1 #fi1 #ig1 #ajf1 #ajg1 #abj1 #abf1 #agd1 #bjc1 #bah1 #bbh1 #cac1 #caf1 #ccb1 #cdj ,gono*orism1 #f1 #gc ,graft+1 ( sexual organs1 #bj ,greeks & religion1 #cbc ,guilt1 hy/]ical consci\sness (1 #bge ,hckel's 8gono*orism10 #f 8,hakon10 ,k+1 #cbh ,hamilton1 #cag ,h&el1 #cbb ,happ9ess1 impossibility (1 #bhe ,h>tley1 #adc1 #cag ,hatr$1 #bcf ,hauptmann1 #bgf ,havelock ,ellis1 #aa1 #ab ,hebbel1 #bgi ,hegel1 #aee ,he9e1 #caf1 #cbc ,hell5ba*1 #bhg ,helmholtz1 #hb1 #ig ,h5ids1 #ii ,h]b>t1 #ic1 #id1 #ada1 #bdf ,h]+1 #adc ,h]maphroditism1 #f1 #g1 #aj1 #ac1 #af1 #ai1 #de 8,h]o-wor%ip10 #aac ,h]twig1 #af ,het]o/ylism1 #cc1 #cd ,hildebr&1 on het]o/ylism1 #cc ,hobbes1 #caf1 #cag ,homosexuality1 ,*ap4 ,,iv41 #de-eb ( fam\s wom51 #ff ,horwicz1 #ic1 #id ,hume1 #ha1 #ada1 #aec1 #afd1 #age1 #aic1 #bjh1 #bah1 #cag ,hum\r1 analysis (1 #cah ,hunt]1 ,john1 #ad ,hut*eson1 #age ,huxley1 #aic1 #cag ,hydrocele1 #be ,hypnotism1 #ej ,hypnotism & hy/]ia1 #bgg ,hy/]ia1 analysis (1 #bfe ,ibs51 #afj1 #ahg1 #bah1 #bbd1 #bca1 #beh1 #bij1 #cbe1 #cdc ,idealism1 #agf ,idioplasm1 #af1 #ba1 #aee ,imag9ation1 ( wom51 #aai ,immortality1 #abg1 #ace1 #cad1 #cdf 8,impressions10 mat]nal1 #bag ,impulse1 sexual1 #hg1 #hh1 #bhb ,individualism1 #agf ,individuality1 #bhb ,individuation1 #bhb ,infants1 sex (1 #bc1 #bd ,innoc5ce1 #bdc ,int]m$iate sexual =ms1 #g ,inv]sion1 sexual1 #de ,irony1 #cbc ,israels1 #caf ,james1 ,w41 #hb1 #add ,janet1 on hy/]ia1 #bfe1 #bfg1 #bfh ,jeal\sy1 & wom51 #bje1 #bhi ,jewi% race1 #cjc ,jews & ,engli% comp>$1 #cai & wom5 comp>$1 #cbj ,jo%ua1 #cbh ,judaism1 ,*ap4 ,,xiii41 #cja-ccj & ,*ri/ianity1 #cbe & ! ,messiah1 #cbi ,kant1 #db1 #he1 #aje1 #ach1 #aej1 #aec1 #aeh1 #aei1 #afa1 #afd1 #aib1 #bjh1 #bcg1 #bdf1 #bgj1 #cac1 #cbj1 #cca1 #cdj ,k>neades1 #ada ,k>s*1 #di ,kaufmann1 #aai ,kepl]1 #cae ,kleptomania1 #bje ,k[alevsky1 ,sonia1 #fg ,kraepel91 #de ,kundry1 #bgj1 #cai1 #ccg1 #cdd 8,lady f ! ,sea10 #bah ,lam>ck1 #ig1 #adc1 #cae ,lange1 #abi1 #bjh ,language1 orig9 (1 #acg ,lat91 wom5 &1 #hi ,lavat]1 #agd ,laws aga9/ homosexuality1 #ea ( sexual attraction1 #bi ,l$a1 #bca1 #bia ,leibnitz1 #adj1 #aga1 #agb1 #caf ,lepage1 ,ba/i51 #fi ,lewes1 #cag ,li>s1 & memory1 #ade ,libr>ies1 & wom51 #bjf ,li*t5b]g1 #aec ,l9nu1 #adj1 #cae ,locke1 #ada1 #cag ,logic & ! ,ego1 ,*ap4 ,,vii41 #aec1 #afb ,logic & e?ic1 ,*ap4 ,,vii41 #aec-afb & memory1 ,*ap4 ,,vi41 #adb-aeb ,loh5gr91 #cbd ,lombroso1 #ach ,lotze1 #abe ,love1 analysis (1 #bcf1 #bea mat]nal1 #bbe & sexuality1 #bci ,lu!r1 #cbe ,luxemburg1 #fi ,ma*1 #adc1 #aed1 #bja1 #bjh1 #baj1 #cbb ,madness1 & g5ius1 #ahc ,madonna wor%ip1 #bdi ,maet]l9ck1 #ajh ,mahomet1 #ahg1 #cbe ,male & ,female1 ,*ap4 ,i41 #gi-hd m9ds1 #bhd plasmas1 #aa ,malic acid 9 f]ns1 #ci ,m>riage1 effect on prog5y ( loveless1 #dd ideas ( boys & girls on1 #ij religi\s1 #bba ,m>x1 #cjg ,m>xism1 #cbi ,mascul9e wom51 #b1 #h1 #ag ,mat*-mak+1 & wom51 #beb-cjj among/ ,jews1 #caa ,mat]ialism1 & ,jews1 #cad ,matri>*y1 #bbb ,matt]1 & =m1 #bic & woman1 #bib ,maupas1 on rotif]s1 #bd ,maupassant1 #bgf ,may]1 #ig ,m$ic9e1 ,jewi% influ5ce on1 #cae ,m$ical view ( hy/]ia1 #bga 8,mei/]s+]s10 #cje ,memory1 #bhb & g5ius1 ,*ap4 ,v41 #aad-ada 9 boys & girls1 #bid 9 relation to logic1 ,*ap4 ,,vi41 #adb-aeb ,messal9a1 #ccf ,messiah1 #cbe1 #cbi ,meta-organisms1 #bhg ,metaphysics1 ,jews &1 #cbb ,microcosm1 #aga ,mill1 ,j4 ,s41 #agf1 #cag ,milne-,edw>ds1 #bia ,mir&ola1 #ahh ,mode/y1 #bfa1 #bgd womanly1 #bjj ,molire1 #cdj ,moll1 #eb1 #hh ,monads1 #aih1 #bhg1 #bid1 #big ,monogamy1 #dc1 #bbj ,morality1 #agf ,morality ( wom51 #aif1 #bgh1 #cdj ,m1 #gc ,morphology1 9 relation to "*1 ,*ap4 ,v41 #eb-fc ,mo!rhood1 analysis (1 ,*ap4 ,x41 #bad-bce ,moz>t1 #cbc ,mll]1 ,joh41 #bag ,murd]1 #aji ,music1 & wom51 #aah ,myxodema1 #be ,naegeli1 #af ,names1 & wom51 #bjf 8,nana10 #bca ,napoleon1 #ahb1 #bbh1 #cbf1 #cbg ,newton1 #adj1 #cae ,new ,te/am5t1 #cbe ,new ,zeal&1 #cci ,nietzs*e1 #ajd1 #ajh1 #adj1 #afg1 #cbi1 #cdb1 #cdd ,nirwana1 #agd ,nobility1 ,jews &1 #cjh ,nrgl]1 #agd ,novalis1 #ajc1 #afe1 #beh ,nudity1 #bdj1 #bda ,organo!rapy1 #ba ,ori5tal view ( wom51 #cdb ,orig51 #ahg ,oscillations1 9 sexuality1 #ed ,o/wald1 #ca1 #cae ,ovid1 #ccb ,ow51 #cjg ,pa9t+1 & wom51 #abj ,pair+1 woman's *ief in/9ct1 #beb-cjj & ,jews1 #caa 8,p>sifal10 #cje1 #ccg1 #cdd ,pascal1 #agi1 #bje ,pasiphe1 #bia ,pa/eur1 #cae ,pat]nity1 #bcb1 #cdf ,pa?ology1 #be ,paul1 ,jean1 #ajc1 #afd1 #cah ,p$]a/y1 ,*ap4 ,,iv41 #de-eb 8,pe] ,gynt10 #bbd1 foot note ,p]iodicity1 ( g5ius1 #ajg ,p]sonality1 multiple1 #baa1 #bfg ,p]soon1 #cc ,petzoldt1 #if1 #ajj ,pfeff]1 #ci ,phallus1 relation (1 to wom51 #bih1 #cdg ,philosophy1 ,engli%1 #aec ,philosoph]s1 & g5ius1 #ada ,physiognomy1 #ei1 #fj ,piety1 #cbb ,pity1 #aii ,plasmas1 male & female1 #aa ,plato1 #adi1 #aej1 #bdj1 #bdf1 #bic1 #cac1 #cdc ,platonic love1 #bci ,pleasure1 #bhb ,polit5ess1 & wom51 #bjc ,politician1 "* (1 #bcj ,politicians & g5ius1 #aci & value1 #acd ,poll51 9 het]o/yl\s fl[]s1 #ce ,poly&ry1 #bbb ,polygamy1 #bbj ,pregnancy1 #hf1 #bbb ,pre-,raphaelites1 #gc ,prvo/1 #bef ,prey]1 #cae ,pride1 ( wom51 #bja ,prop]ty1 ,jewi% relation to1 #cjf ,pro/itution1 analysis (1 ,*ap4 ,x41 #bad-bce ,prote/antism1 & wom51 #bjg ,psy*ology1 #adb male & female1 ,*ap4 ,,ix41 #ahf-bac ,pub]ty1 effect (1 #ij ,py?agoras1 #cdc ,rabbis1 ,jewi%1 #caa ,race1 p]si/5ce ( human1 #bbd1 #cdf ,raphael1 #bbf ,recognition1 #bhb ,r$ ,sea1 cross+ (1 #cbc ,reg5]ation1 ( lo/ p>ts1 #af moral1 #bhc ,religion1 f\nd]s (1 #cbf1 #cbg importance (1 #cbc ,jews &1 #cba wom5 &1 #bfa ,rev5ge1 #bhi ,rev]5ce1 #cbb ,ri*ep91 #bbf ,r\sseau1 #cjg ,rudim5ts1 ( embryonic sexual organs1 #c ,rusk91 #cjg ,/4 ,augu/9e1 #cde ,salome1 #cde ,samson1 #cbh ,s&1 ,george1 #ff ,sappho1 #fe1 #ff ,s*ell+1 #ha1 #aje1 #ach1 #afe1 #bdf ,s*ill]1 #bcj1 #bdf ,s*lei]ma*]1 #adj ,s*oolma/]s1 & types1 #eg ,s*op5hau]1 #ie1 #afg1 #agd1 #aii1 #bah1 #bbc1 #bcf1 #bcg1 #bch1 #bha1 #bie1 #cje1 #cac1 #cah1 #cdj ,s*r5k-,notz+1 #de ,s*urtz1 #bje ,s*wamm]dam1 #cae ,sci5ce1 & g5ius1 #adj ,judaism1 91 #cad ,secretion1 int]nal1 & sexual *>act]s1 #ae ,sellheim & ,foges1 exp]im5ts on ca/ration1 #ah ,s]vant1 type ( woman1 #bgb ,sex1 appe>ance (1 9 embryos1 #e assignm5t (1 to infants1 #bb1 #bc1 #bd ,sexual attraction1 laws (1 ,*ap4 ,,iii41 #bf-dd *>act]s1 second>y1 #ad1 #dc impulses1 #hh ,sexuality1 ( male & female comp>$1 #he1 #ib oppos$ to love1 #bci ( wom51 #bfj1 #cca1 #ccb1 #ccd1 #cce ,%aftesbury1 #bdf ,%akespe>e1 #aje1 #aji1 #aaj1 #cag ,%elley1 #afh1 #cag ,%rew1 type ( woman1 #bgb 8,siegfri$10 #bbc1 #cje ,sigw>t1 #aef ,simmel1 ,george1 #adh ,slav]y1 comp>$ ) ,jewi% problem1 #cch ,smi?1 ,adam1 #age1 #cag ,socialism1 #cjg ,society1 orig9 (1 #bje ,socrates1 #aej1 #bdf1 #cbf ,solid>ity1 ( ! ,jews1 #caj ,solitude1 & wom51 #bje ,solli]s1 on sexual an/hesia1 #bgd ,som]ville1 ,m>y1 #aid ,sophocles1 #ahd ,s\l1 #cac d5i$ by mod]n sci5ce1 #cae & great m51 #afh & mod]n psy*ology1 #bji & wom51 #ahg ,sp5c]1 ,h]b]t1 #abh1 #acj1 #bfc1 #cag ,sp9oza1 #caf1 #cag ,spr5gel1 #cae ,/ate1 #cjg ,/e5/rup1 #ab1 #ac ,/]ility1 #baf ,/]n1 ,l4 ,w41 #hb ,/]ne1 #cag 8,/ockman1 ,dr410 #cbe ,/rauss1 #aab ,/r9db]g1 #ahg ,sud]mann1 #bef ,sugge/ibility1 ( wom51 #bid ,suicide1 ( wom51 #bhf ,sulpicia1 #cai ,sup]/ition1 ( wom51 #abg ,swift1 #cag1 #cdc ,sympa?y1 #agg1 #aig 8,tannhus]10 #bdj1 #cje ,telegony1 #bcc ,t]esa1 ,/41 #bgg ,t]tullian1 #ahg1 #cad1 #cdc 8,tesman10 9 ,h$da ,gabl]1 #beh ,!lyplasm1 ,*ap4 ,,ii41 #aa-be ,"t1 relation to value1 #acc ,tol/oy1 #bca ,t\*1 s5se (1 9 wom51 #aia ,trag$y1 #cai ,transc5d5talism1 #cad ,transfusion1 ( blood1 #bj ,travel1 desire (1 #bcg1 note ,tru?1 #aej ,trck1 #ach ,tylor1 #abh ,types1 male & female1 m5tal1 #ec ,und9e1 #ahh ,univ]sality1 ( g5ius1 #aab ,untru?fulness1 ( wom51 #bff ,value1 !ory (1 #acc ,vanity1 ( wom51 #bjb ,v>iation 9 sexual *>act]s1 #ah ,virg9ity1 a male idea1 #ccc woman's attitude to1 #ccd ,virtue ( wom51 #ccc ,vogt1 on hy/]ia1 #bfe1 #bgd1 #bgg ,von ,es*5ba*1 #bfd ,von ,hffd+1 #add ,von ,humboldt1 #adj ,von ,klei/1 #aje ,von ,mbius1 #ei ,wagn]1 #fg1 #aji1 #baa1 #bdj1 #bgi1 #cje1 #cai1 #cdc ,weill1 #cf ,weismann1 #ha ,wi]1 #ha ,w1 #bhb ,wit & hum\r1 #cah ,woman & animals1 #bij1 #bia "* (1 #bhj emancipat$1 #fd fam\s1 #fi future (1 ,*ap4 ,,xiv41 #cca-cdj comp>$ ) ,jews1 #cbj & matt]1 #bib sexuality (1 #bfj summ>y ( h] nature1 ,*ap4 ,,xii41 #beb-cjj ,wundt1 #id1 #aca1 #adj 8,z>a?u/ra10 #ajh1 #afg ,zionism1 #cjg1 #cab ,zola1 #aje1 #bca1 #cjd ,pr9t$ by ,,ballantyne ,,co4 ,,limit$ ,tavi/ock ,/reet1 ,london ,transcrib]'s ,notes ,! language ( ! s\rce docum5t 7includ+ inconsi/5cies 9 spell+1 hyph5ation1 etc47 has be5 reta9$1 unless li/$ bel[4 ,_m ( ! prop] names m5tion$ 9 ! book are spell$ diff]5tly f :at is usual4 ,^! h be5 left z pr9t$ z well1 unless li/$ bel[4 ,page xviii1 ,cont9u\s & discont9uance memory3 z pr9t$ 9 ! s\rce docum5t4 ,page #cf1 s _m o!r actors3 possibly an error = s _m o!r factors4 ,page #ada1 ,prosp]a3 possibly an error = ,prosp]o4 ,page #bje1 mu* m develop$ 9 m5 ?an 9 wom53 probably an error = mu* m develop$ 9 wom5 ?an 9 m5 7cf4 rema9d] ( p>agraph74 ,page #bhb1 ,! t]ms 9 ! left-h& r[3 z pr9t$ 9 ! s\rce docum5t4 ,page #cjg1 9 ! left r[3 z pr9t$ 9 ! s\rce docum5t4 ,*anges made ,"s m9or obvi\s typographical & punctuation errors & mispr9ts h be5 correct$ sil5tly4 ,footnotes h be5 mov$ to directly und]nea? ! p>agraph :]e !y are ref]5c$4 ,page #g3 ,boyle-,guy-,lussac *ang$ to ,boyle-,gay-,lussac ,page #be3 !lypla/ic *ang$ to !lyplasmic ,page #bi3 clos+ quote m>k add$ aft] 444 9 diff]5t proportions4 ,page #ch3 ,po/wang5 *ang$ to ,po/wag5 ,page #fi3 ,jeanna de la ,mo! ,guyon *ang$ to ,jeanne de la ,mo! ,guyon2 ,footnote #f3 ,hy/]ias if 444 *ang$ to ,hy/]ia is 444 ,page #ig3 ,helmholz *ang$ to ,helmholtz z else:]e ,page #aah3 ,klopp/ock *ang$ to ,klop/ock ,page #afj3 ,nebbel's epigram *ang$ to ,hebbel's epigram ,page #aha3 ,erne/ ,mack *ang$ to ,erne/ ,ma* ,page #ahe3 clos+ quote m>k add$ aft] ,lat9 text ,page #bag3 ,?4 ,bis*( *ang$ to ,?4 ,bis*(f ,page #cje3 ,tannhas] *ang$ to ,tannhus] ,index3 "s m9or spell+ *anges made to con=m to ! text4