,note3 ,images of the original pages are available through ,internet ,archive4 ,see https3_/_/archive4org_/details_/humespol itical#jj;humeuoft ,some characters might not display properly in this ,,utf-#h text file 7e4g41 empty squares74 ,if so1 the reader should consult the original page images noted above4 ,transcriber's note3 ,text enclosed by underscores is in italics 7italics74 ,original small capitals are now uppercase 7but some small capital styling has been discarded74 ,footnotes have been relabeled #a-aag1 converted to endnotes1 and moved to the ends of the relevant chapters4 ,the ,scott ,library4 ,,hume',s ,,political ,,discourses4 ,for ,full ,list of the ,volumes in ,this ,series1 ,see ,catalogue at ,end of ,book4 ,,hume',s ,,political ,,discourses4 ,with an ,introduction by ,william ,bell ,robertson1 ,author of 8,foundations of ,political ,economy10 8,slavery of ,labour10 ,etc4 ,the ,walter ,scott ,publishing ,co41 ,ltd4 ,london and ,felling-on-,tyne4 ,new ,york3 #c ,east #adth ,street4 ,,contents4 ,introduction vii ,of ,commerce #a ,of ,refinement in the ,arts #ae ,of ,money #bg ,of ,interest #ci ,of the ,balance of ,trade #ea ,of the ,jealousy of ,trade #fg ,of the ,balance of ,power #ga ,of ,taxes #gh ,of ,public ,credit #hc ,of some ,remarkable ,customs #ih ,of the ,populousness of ,ancient ,nations #ajf ,of the ,original ,contract #agd ,of ,passive ,obedience #aib ,of the ,coalition of ,parties #aif ,of the ,protestant ,succession #bjc ,idea of a ,perfect ,commonwealth #bad ,that ,politics may be ,reduced to a ,science #bbi ,of the ,first ,principles of ,government #bdc ,of ,political ,society #bdg ,alphabetical ,arrangement of ,authorities cited by ,hume #bec ,,introduction4 ,regretting the meagre records of the life of ,adam ,smith1 the ,right ,hon4 ,r4 ,b4 ,haldane1 ,m4,p41#a remarks3--8,we think of him1 in the main1 and we think of him rightly1 as the bosom friend of ,david ,hume0 7b4 #agaa1 d4 #aggg74 ,naturally1 incidents in the life of a philosopher are neither numerous nor stirring4 ,it is unreasonable to expect them1 and such stories as are handed down regarding great thinkers are best not to be accepted unreservedly4 ,i leave ,hume1 therefore1 to present his own picture as drawn in ,my own ,life--the picture he wished posterity to have--which consequently follows this introduction1 and is itself followed by ,adam ,smith's celebrated letter to ,mr4 ,strahan1 ,hume's publisher1 giving an account of ,hume's death4 ,it is chiefly as a political economist that ,hume concerns us here1 as it is in the ,political ,discourses1 first published in #ageb1 his economic principles are set forth4 ,what the reader may expect to find in these ,discourses ,i prefer to let writers of renown tell4 ,thus ,lord ,brougham-- 8,of the ,political ,discourses it would be difficult to speak in terms of too great commendation4 ,they combine almost every excellence which can belong to such a performance4 ,the reasoning is clear1 and unencumbered with more words or more illustrations than are necessary for bringing out the doctrines4 ,the learning is extensive1 accurate1 and profound1 not only as to systems of philosophy1 but as to history1 whether modern or ancient4 4 4 4 ,the great merit1 however1 of these ,discourses is their originality1 and the new system of politics and political economy which they unfold4 ,mr4 ,hume is1 beyond all doubt1 the author of the modern doctrines which now rule the world of science1 which are to a great extent the guide of practical statesmen1 and are only prevented from being applied in their fullest extent to the affairs of nations by the clashing interests and the ignorant prejudices of certain powerful classes40 ,thus1 again1 ,j4 ,hill ,burton1#b ,hume's biographer-- 8,these ,discourses are in truth the cradle of political economy2 and much as that science has been investigated and expounded in later times1 these earliest1 shortest1 and simplest developments of its principles are still read with delight even by those who are masters of all the literature of this great subject4 ,but they possess a quality which more elaborate economists have striven after in vain1 in being a pleasing object of study not only to the initiated1 but to the ordinary popular reader1 and of being admitted as just and true by many who cannot or will not understand the views of later writers on political economy4 ,they have thus the rarely conjoined merit that1 as they were the first to direct the way to the true sources of this department of knowledge1 those who have gone farther1 instead of superseding them1 have in the general case confirmed their accuracy40 ,the ,discourses1 in ,hume's own words1 was 8the only work of mine that was successful on the first publication10 and its success was great4 ,translated into ,french immediately1 8they conferred10 says ,professor ,huxley1 8a ,european reputation upon their author2 and1 what was more to the purpose1 influenced the later school of economists of the eighteenth century40 ,on the same head ,burton says--8,as no ,frenchman had previously approached the subject of political economy with a philosophical pen1 this little book was a main instrument1 either by causing assent or provoking controversy1 in producing the host of ,french works published between the time of its translation and the publication of ,smith's ,wealth of ,nations in #aggf4 ,the work of the elder ,mirabeau in particular--,l'ami des ,hommes--was in a great measure a controversial examination of ,hume's opinions on population40 ,professor ,knight of ,st4 ,andrews1 again1 echoes similar sentiments4 8,the merit of the ,discourses10 he remarks1 8is not only great1 but they are unrivalled to this day2 and it is not too much to affirm that they prepared the way for all the subsequent economic literature of ,england1 including the ,wealth of ,nations1 in which ,smith laid down the broad and durable foundations of the science4 4 4 4 ,the effect produced by these ,discourses was great4 ,immediately translated into ,french1 they passed through five editions in fourteen years4 ,they were a distinctive addition to ,english literature1 and were strictly scientific1 though not technical4 ,they at once floated ,hume into fame1 bringing him to the front1 both as a thinker and as a man of letters2 and posterity has ratified this judgment of the hour4 4 4 4 ,they contain many original germs of economic truth4 ,the effect they had on practical statesmen1 such as ,pitt1 must not be overlooked4 ,it was perhaps an advantage that the economic doctrines1 both of ,hume and ,smith1 were published at that particular time1 as they led naturally and easily to several reforms1 without being developed to extremes1 as was subsequently the case in ,france40 ,all this testimony as to the merits of the ,discourses--testimony from men of widely divergent views--is sufficient justification for offering them in popular form to the public at a time like the present1 when the foundations of political economy are1 one might say1 being re-laid4#c ,we have already hinted at the friendship that existed between ,hume and ,adam ,smith4 ,hume was ,smith's senior by twelve years1 and seems to have had the latter brought under his notice by ,hutcheson1 ,professor of ,moral ,philosophy at ,glasgow ,university4 ,in a letter to ,hutcheson1 dated ,march #dth1 #agdj1 he says--8,my bookseller has sent to ,mr4 ,smith a copy of my book1#d which ,i hope he has received as well as your letter40 8,the ,smith here mentioned10 ,burton says1 8we may fairly conclude1 notwithstanding the universality of the name1 to be ,adam ,smith1 who was then a student in the ,university of ,glasgow1 and not quite seventeen years old4 ,it may be inferred that ,hutcheson had mentioned ,smith as a person on whom it would serve some good purpose to bestow a copy of the ,treatise2 and we have here evidently the first introduction to each other's notice of two friends1 of whom it can be said there was no third person writing the ,english language during the same period who has had so much influence upon the opinions of mankind as either of these two men40 ,hume's influence upon ,adam ,smith was great4 ,even in the ring of the phraseology of the ,wealth of ,nations ,i sometimes fancy ,i can hear ,hume4 ,anyway1 the book referred to in the above letter as sent to ,smith1 ,mr4 ,haldane considers as 8in all probability0 the determining factor in making ,smith abandon his original intention of entering the ,church4 8,whether ,hume could have been but for ,smith we cannot now say2 but we know that1 but for ,hume1 ,smith could never have been40#e ,while agreeing that 8but for ,hume ,smith could never have been10 ,i see no reason to question that ,hume could have been without ,smith4 ,hume had within him what may here be called the divine light1 and it had to come out4 ,that is why1 8in poverty and riches1 in health and sickness1 in laborious obscurity and amidst the blaze of fame10 his ruling passion--a passion for literature--never abated4 ,no man can strike out for himself an original line and stick to it like this1 8through thick and thin10 unless he have assurance of the truth of that that is in him4 ,hume had this assurance4 ,true1 he sought fame--and he achieved fame2 not for its own sake--that is inconceivable in so great a thinker1 a thinker with such a true notion of the relation of things--but for the sake of the truths he had to promulgate2 for the higher his eminence the wider and more attentive would be his audience4 ,of course1 he sought fame1 and he found gratification in it4 ,it was not the gratification of vanity1 however1 that writers on ,hume usually interpret it as2 it was the gratification arising from the knowledge that one has hit the mark--that one has not laboured in vain4 ,the petty vanity ascribed to ,hume would not have suffered him as 8the parent of the first elucidations of political economy to see his own offspring eclipsed1 and to see it with pride0--his attitude1 according to ,burton1 on the successful reception of ,the ,wealth of ,nations4 ,vanity1 again1 would have prevented between these two men that unalloyed friendship so charming to contemplate4 ,in #aggf1 the year before ,hume's death1 ,the ,wealth of ,nations appeared1 and here is how ,hume writes to the author3-- 8,february #h1 #aggf4 8,,dear ,,smith1--,i am as lazy a correspondent as you1 yet my anxiety about you makes me write4 ,by all accounts your book has been printed long ago2 yet it has never been so much as advertized4 ,what is the reason8 ,if you wait till the fate of ,america be decided1 you may wait long4 8,by all accounts you intend to settle with us this spring2 yet we hear no more of it4 ,what is the reason8 ,your chamber in my house is always unoccupied4 ,i am always at home4 ,i expect you to land here4 8,i have been1 am1 and shall be probably in an indifferent state of health4 ,i weighed myself t'other day1 and find ,i have fallen five complete stones4 ,if you delay much longer ,i shall probably disappear altogether4 8,the ,duke of ,buccleuch tells me that you are very zealous in ,american affairs4 ,my notion is that the matter is not so important as is commonly imagined4 ,if ,i be mistaken1 ,i shall probably correct my error when ,i see you or read you4 ,our navigation and general commerce may suffer more than our manufactures4 ,should ,london fall as much in its size as ,i have done1 it will be the better4 ,it is nothing but a hulk of bad and unclean humours40 ,at last the book appears1 and ,hume writes his friend1 ,april #ast1 #aggf3-- 8,i am much pleased with your performance2 and the perusal of it has taken me from a state of great anxiety4 ,it was a work of so much expectation by yourself1 by your friends1 and by the public1 that ,i trembled for its first appearance1 but am now much relieved4 ,not but that the reading of it necessarily requires so much attention1 and the public is disposed to give so little1 that ,i shall still doubt for some time of its being at first very popular4 ,but it has depth and solidity and acuteness1 and is so much illustrated by curious facts that it must at last take the public attention4 ,it is probably much improved by your last abode in ,london4 ,if you were here at my fireside1 ,i should dispute some of your principles4 ,i cannot think that the rent of farms makes any part of the price of produce1#f but that the price is determined altogether by the quantity and the demand4 4 4 4 ,but these and a hundred other points are fit only to be discussed in conversation40 ,hume1 though he 8took a particular pleasure in the company of modest women1 and had no reason to be displeased with the reception he met with from them10 died unmarried4 ,adam ,smith also died unmarried1 8though he was for several years10 according to ,dugald ,stewart1 8attached to a young lady of great beauty and accomplishment40 ,hume1 in the ,essay 8,of the ,study of ,history10 speaks of being desired once by 8a young beauty for whom ,i had some passion to send her some novels and romances for her amusement40 ,david was a 8canny0 man though4 ,in these circumstances the following playful sally in a letter from ,hume to ,mrs4 ,dysart1 of ,eccles1 a relative1 may have interest3--8,what arithmetic will serve to fix the proportion between good and bad wives1 and rate the different classes of each8 ,sir ,isaac ,newton himself1 who could measure the course of the planets and weigh the earth as in a pair of scales--even he had not algebra enough to reduce that amiable part of our species to a just equation2 and they are the only heavenly bodies whose orbits are as yet uncertain40 ,the foregoing are mere glimpses of this truly great man1 and are offered with a view to awakening and stimulating amongst general readers a desire for first-hand knowledge of ,david ,hume4 ,w4 ,b4 ,r4 ,may #aijf4 ,,my ,,own ,,life4 ,it is difficult for a man to speak long of himself without vanity2 therefore1 ,i shall be short4 ,it may be thought an instance of vanity that ,i pretend at all to write my life2 but this narrative shall contain little more than the ,history of my ,writings2 as1 indeed1 almost all my life has been spent in literary pursuits and occupations4 ,the first success of most of my writings was not such as to be an object of vanity4 ,i was born the #bfth of ,april #agaa1 old style1 at ,edinburgh4 ,i was of a good family1 both by father and mother4 ,my father's family is a branch of the ,earl of ,home's or ,hume's2 and my ancestors had been proprietors of the estate1 which my brother possesses1 for several generations4 ,my mother was daughter of ,sir ,david ,falconer1 ,president of the ,college of ,justice2 the title of ,halkerton came by succession to her brother4 ,my family1 however1 was not rich2 and1 being myself a younger brother1 my patrimony1 according to the mode of my country1 was of course very slender4 ,my father1 who passed for a man of parts1 died when ,i was an infant1 leaving me1 with an elder brother and a sister1 under the care of our mother1 a woman of singular merit1 who1 though young and handsome1 devoted herself entirely to the rearing and educating of her children4 ,i passed through the ordinary course of education with success1 and was seized very early with a passion for literature1 which has been the ruling passion of my life1 and the great source of my enjoyments4 ,my studious disposition1 my sobriety1 and my industry gave my family a notion that the law was a proper profession for me2 but ,i found an insurmountable aversion to everything but the pursuits of philosophy and general learning2 and while they fancied ,i was poring upon ,voet and ,vinnius1 ,cicero and ,virgil were the authors which ,i was secretly devouring4 ,my very slender fortune1 however1 being unsuitable to this plan of life1 and my health being a little broken by my ardent application1 ,i was tempted1 or rather forced1 to make a very feeble trial for entering into a more active scene of life4 ,in #agcd ,i went to ,bristol1 with some recommendations to eminent merchants1 but in a few months found that scene totally unsuitable to me4 ,i went over to ,france1 with a view of prosecuting my studies in a country retreat1 and ,i there laid that plan of life which ,i have steadily and successfully pursued4 ,i resolved to make a very rigid frugality supply my deficiency of fortune1 to maintain unimpaired my independency1 and to regard every object as contemptible except the improvement of my talents in literature4 ,during my retreat in ,france1 first at ,rheims1 but chiefly at ,la ,fleche1 in ,anjou1 ,i composed my ,treatise of ,human ,nature4 ,after passing three years very agreeably in that country1 ,i came over to ,london in #agcg4 ,in the end of #agch ,i published my ,treatise1 and immediately went down to my mother and my brother1 who lived at his country-house1 and was employing himself very judiciously and successfully in the improvement of his fortune4 ,never literary attempt was more unfortunate than my ,treatise of ,human ,nature4 ,it fell dead-born from the press1 without reaching such distinction as even to excite a murmur among the zealots4 ,but being naturally of a cheerful and sanguine temper1 ,i very soon recovered the blow1 and prosecuted with great ardour my studies in the country4 ,in #agdb ,i printed at ,edinburgh the first part of my ,essays3 the work was favourably received1 and soon made me entirely forget my former disappointment4 ,i continued with my mother and brother in the country1 and in that time recovered the knowledge of the ,greek language1 which ,i had too much neglected in my early youth4 ,in #agde ,i received a letter from the ,marquis of ,annandale1 inviting me to come and live with him in ,england2 ,i found also that the friends and family of that young nobleman were desirous of putting him under my care and direction1 for the state of his mind and health required it4 ,i lived with him a twelvemonth4 ,my appointments during that time made a considerable accession to my small fortune4 ,i then received an invitation from ,general ,st4 ,clair to attend him as a secretary to his expedition1 which was at first meant against ,canada1 but ended in an incursion on the coast of ,france4 ,next year--to wit1 #agdg--;,i received an invitation from the ,general to attend him in the same station in his military embassy to the courts of ,vienna and ,turin4 ,i then wore the uniform of an officer1 and was introduced at these courts as aide-de-camp to the ,general1 along with ,sir ,harry ,erskine and ,captain ,grant1 now ,general ,grant4 ,these two years were almost the only interruptions which my studies have received during the course of my life4 ,i passed them agreeably1 and in good company2 and my appointments1 with my frugality1 had made me reach a fortune1 which ,i called independent1 though most of my friends were inclined to smile when ,i said so2 in short1 ,i was now master of near a thousand pounds4 ,i had always entertained a notion that my want of success in publishing the ,treatise of ,human ,nature had proceeded more from the manner than the matter1 and that ,i had been guilty of a very usual indiscretion in going to the press too early4 ,i1 therefore1 cast the first part of that work anew in the ,inquiry concerning ,human ,understanding1 which was published while ,i was at ,turin4 ,but this piece was at first little more successful than the ,treatise of ,human ,nature4 ,on my return from ,italy1 ,i had the mortification to find all ,england in a ferment on account of ,dr4 ,middleton's ,free ,inquiry1 while my performance was entirely overlooked and neglected4 ,a new edition1 which had been published at ,london1 of my ,essays1 ,moral and ,political1 met not with a much better reception4 ,such is the force of natural temper1 that these disappointments made little or no impression on me4 ,i went down in #agdi and lived two years with my brother at his country-house1 for my mother was now dead4 ,i there composed the second part of my ,essays1 which ,i called ,political ,discourses1 and also my ,inquiry concerning the ,principles of ,morals1 which is another part of my ,treatise that ,i cast anew4 ,meanwhile1 my bookseller1 ,a4 ,millar1 informed me that my former publications 7all but the unfortunate ,treatise7 were beginning to be the subject of conversation2 that the sale of them was gradually increasing1 and that new editions were demanded4 ,answers by ,reverends and ,right ,reverends came out two or three in a year2 and ,i found1 by ,dr4 ,warburton's railing1 that the books were beginning to be esteemed in good company4 ,however1 ,i had a fixed resolution1 which ,i inflexibly maintained1 never to reply to anybody2 and not being very irascible in my temper1 ,i have easily kept myself clear of all literary squabbles4 ,these symptoms of a rising reputation gave me encouragement1 as ,i was ever more disposed to see the favourable than unfavourable side of things2 a turn of mind which it is more happy to possess than to be born to an estate of ten thousand a year4 ,in #agea ,i removed from the country to the town1 the true scene for a man of letters4 ,in #ageb were published at ,edinburgh1 where ,i then lived1 my ,political ,discourses1 the only work of mine that was successful on the first publication4 ,it was well received abroad and at home4 ,in the same year was published at ,london my ,inquiry concerning the ,principles of ,morals2 which1 in my own opinion 7who ought not to judge on that subject71 is of all my writings1 historical1 philosophical1 or literary1 incomparably the best4 ,it came unnoticed and unobserved into the world4 ,in #ageb the ,faculty of ,advocates chose me their ,librarian1 an office from which ,i received little or no emolument1 but which gave me the command of a large library4 ,i then formed the plan of writing the ,history of ,england2 but being frightened with the notion of continuing a narrative through a period of seventeen hundred years1 ,i commenced with the accession of the ,house of ,stuart1 an epoch when1 ,i thought1 the misrepresentations of faction began chiefly to take place4 ,i was1 ,i own1 sanguine in my expectations of the success of this work4 ,i thought that ,i was the only historian that had at once neglected present power1 interest1 and authority1 and the cry of popular prejudices2 and as the subject was suited to every capacity1 ,i expected proportional applause4 ,but miserable was my disappointment3 ,i was assailed by one cry of reproach1 disapprobation1 and even detestation2 ,english1 ,scotch1 and ,irish1 ,whig and ,tory1 ,churchman and ,sectary1 ,freethinker and ,religionist1 ,patriot and ,courtier1 united in their rage against the man who had presumed to shed a generous tear for the fate of ,charles ,i4 and the ,earl of ,strafford2 and after the first ebullitions of their fury were over1 what was still more mortifying1 the book seemed to sink into oblivion4 ,mr4 ,millar told me that in a twelvemonth1 he sold only forty-five copies of it4 ,i scarcely1 indeed1 heard of one man in the three kingdoms1 considerable for rank or letters1 that could endure the book4 ,i must only except the ,primate of ,england1 ,dr4 ,herring1 and the ,primate of ,ireland1 ,dr4 ,stone1 which seem two odd exceptions4 ,these dignified prelates separately sent me messages not to be discouraged4 ,i was1 however1 ,i confess1 discouraged2 and had not the war been at that time breaking out between ,france and ,england1 ,i had certainly retired to some provincial town of the former kingdom1 have changed my name1 and never more have returned to my native country4 ,but as this scheme was not now practicable1 and the subsequent volume was considerably advanced1 ,i resolved to pick up courage1 and to persevere4 ,in this interval ,i published at ,london my ,natural ,history of ,religion1 along with some other small pieces4 ,its public entry was rather obscure1 except only that ,dr4 ,hurd wrote a pamphlet against it1 with all the illiberal petulance1 arrogance1 and scurrility which distinguish the ,warburtonian school4 ,this pamphlet gave me some consolation for the otherwise indifferent reception of my performance4 ,in #agef1 two years after the fall of the first volume1 was published the second volume of my ,history1 containing the period from the death of ,charles ,i4 till the ,revolution4 ,this performance happened to give less displeasure to the ,whigs1 and was better received4 ,it not only rose itself1 but helped to buoy up its unfortunate brother4 ,but though ,i had been taught1 by experience1 that the ,whig party were in possession of bestowing all places1 both in the ,state and in literature1 ,i was so little inclined to yield to their senseless clamour1 that in about a hundred alterations which further study1 reading1 or reflection engaged me to make in the reigns of the two first ,stuarts1 ,i have made all of them invariably to the ,tory side4 ,it is ridiculous to consider the ,english constitution before that period as a regular plan of liberty4 ,in #agei ,i published my ,history of the ,house of ,tudor4 ,the clamour against this performance was almost equal to that against the history of the two first ,stuarts4 ,the reign of ,elizabeth was particularly obnoxious4 ,but ,i was now callous against the impressions of public folly1 and continued very peaceably and contentedly in my retreat at ,edinburgh1 to finish1 in two volumes1 the more early part of the ,english ,history1 which ,i gave to the public in #agfa1 with tolerable1 and but tolerable success4 ,but notwithstanding this variety of winds and seasons1 to which my writings had been exposed1 they had still been making such advances that the copy-money given me by the booksellers much exceeded anything formerly known in ,england2 ,i was become not only independent1 but opulent4 ,i retired to my native country of ,scotland1 determined never more to set my foot out of it2 and retaining the satisfaction of never having preferred a request to one great man1 or even making advances of friendship to any of them4 ,as ,i was now turned of fifty1 ,i thought of passing all the rest of my life in this philosophical manner1 when ,i received1 in #agfc1 an invitation from the ,earl of ,hertford1 with whom ,i was not in the least acquainted1 to attend him on his embassy to ,paris1 with a near prospect of being appointed ,secretary to the embassy1 and1 in the meanwhile1 of performing the functions of that office4 ,this offer1 however inviting1 ,i at first declined1 both because ,i was reluctant to begin connections with the great1 and because ,i was afraid the civilities and gay company of ,paris would prove disagreeable to a person of my age and humour2 but on his lordship's repeating the invitation1 ,i accepted of it4 ,i have every reason1 both of pleasure and interest1 to think myself happy in my connections with that nobleman1 as well as afterwards with his brother1 ,general ,conway4 ,those who have not seen the strange effects of ,modes1 will never imagine the reception ,i met with at ,paris1 from men and women of all ranks and stations4 ,the more ,i resiled from their excessive civilities1 the more ,i was loaded with them4 ,there is1 however1 a real satisfaction in living in ,paris1 from the great number of sensible1 knowing1 and polite company with which that city abounds above all places in the universe4 ,i thought once of settling there for life4 ,i was appointed ,secretary to the embassy2 and in summer #agfe1 ,lord ,hertford left me1 being appointed ,lord ,lieutenant of ,ireland4 ,i was charg d'affaires till the arrival of the ,duke of ,richmond1 towards the end of the year4 ,in the beginning of #agff ,i left ,paris1 and next summer went to ,edinburgh1 with the same view as formerly1 of burying myself in a philosophical retreat4 ,i returned to that place1 not richer1 but with much more money1 and a much larger income1 by means of ,lord ,hertford's friendship1 than ,i left it2 and ,i was desirous of trying what superfluity could produce1 as ,i had formerly made an experiment of a competency4 ,but in #agfg ,i received from ,mr4 ,conway an invitation to be ,under ,secretary2 and this invitation1 both the character of the person and my connections with ,lord ,hertford prevented me from declining4 ,i returned to ,edinburgh in #agfi1 very opulent 7for ,i possessed a revenue of #ajjj a year71 healthy1 and1 though somewhat stricken in years1 with the prospect of enjoying long my ease1 and of seeing the increase of my reputation4 ,in spring #agge1 ,i was struck with a disorder in my bowels1 which at first gave me no alarm1 but has since1 as ,i apprehend it1 become mortal and incurable4 ,i now reckon upon a speedy dissolution4 ,i have suffered very little pain from my disorder2 and what is more strange1 have1 notwithstanding the great decline of my person1 never suffered a moment's abatement of my spirits2 insomuch1 that were ,i to name the period of my life which ,i should most choose to pass over again1 ,i might be tempted to point to this later period4 ,i possess the same ardour as ever in study1 and the same gaiety in company4 ,i consider1 besides1 that a man of sixty-five1 by dying1 cuts off only a few years of infirmities2 and though ,i see many symptoms of my literary reputation's breaking out at last with additional lustre1 ,i knew that ,i could have but few years to enjoy it4 ,it is difficult to be more detached from life than ,i am at present4 ,to conclude historically with my own character4 ,i am1 or rather was 7for that is the style ,i must now use in speaking of myself1 which emboldens me the more to speak my sentiments7--,i was1 ,i say1 a man of mild dispositions1 of command of temper1 of an open1 social1 and cheerful humour1 capable of attachment1 but little susceptible of enmity1 and of great moderation in all my passions4 ,even my love of literary fame1 my ruling passion1 never soured my temper1 notwithstanding my frequent disappointments4 ,my company was not unacceptable to the young and careless1 as well as to the studious and literary2 and as ,i took a particular pleasure in the company of modest women1 ,i had no reason to be displeased with the reception ,i met with from them4 ,in a word1 though most men anywise eminent have found reason to complain of calumny1 ,i never was touched1 or even attacked by her baleful tooth3 and though ,i wantonly exposed myself to the rage of both civil and religious factions1 they seemed to be disarmed in my behalf of their wonted fury4 ,my friends never had occasion to vindicate any one circumstance of my character and conduct3 not but that the zealots1 we may well suppose1 would have been glad to invent and propagate any story to my disadvantage1 but they never could find any which they thought would wear the face of probability4 ,i cannot say there is no vanity in making this funeral oration of myself1 but ,i hope it is not a misplaced one2 and this is a matter of fact which is easily cleared and ascertained4 ,april #ah1 #aggf4 ,,adam ,,smith',s ,,celebrated ,,account ,,of ,,hume',s ,,death4 8,,kirkcaldy1 ,,fifeshire1 ,nov4 #i1 #aggf4 8,,dear ,,sir1--,it is with a real1 though a very melancholy pleasure1 that ,i sit down to give you some account of the behaviour of our excellent friend1 ,mr4 ,hume1 during his last illness4 8,though1 in his own judgment1 his disease was mortal and incurable1 yet he allowed himself to be prevailed upon1 by the entreaty of his friends1 to try what might be the effects of a long journey4 ,a few days before he set out he wrote that account of his own life which1 together with his other papers1 he has left to your care4 ,my account1 therefore1 shall begin where his ends4 8,he set out for ,london towards the end of ,april1 and at ,morpeth met with ,mr4 ,john ,home and myself1 who had both come down from ,london to see him1 expecting to have found him in ,edinburgh4 ,mr4 ,home returned with him1 and attended him during the whole of his stay in ,england1 with that care and attention which might be expected from a temper so perfectly friendly and affectionate4 ,as ,i had written to my mother that she might expect me in ,scotland1 ,i was under the necessity of continuing my journey4 ,his disease seemed to yield to exercise and change of air1 and when he arrived in ,london he was apparently in much better health than when he left ,edinburgh4 ,he was advised to go to ,bath to drink the waters1 which appeared for some time to have so good an effect upon him that even he himself began to entertain1 what he was not apt to do1 a better opinion of his own health4 ,his symptoms1 however1 soon returned with their usual violence1 and from that moment he gave up all thoughts of recovery1 but submitted with the utmost cheerfulness1 and the most perfect complacency and resignation4 ,upon his return to ,edinburgh1 though he found himself much weaker1 yet his cheerfulness never abated1 and he continued to divert himself as usual1 with correcting his own works for a new edition1 and reading books of amusement1 with the conversation of his friends1 and1 sometimes in the evening1 with a party at his favourite game of whist4 ,his cheerfulness was so great1 his conversation and amusements ran so much in their usual strain that1 notwithstanding all bad symptoms1 many people could not believe he was dying4 #8,i shall tell your friend1 ,colonel ,edmondstone1' said ,doctor ,dundas to him one day1 #8that ,i left you much better1 and in a fair way of recovery4' #8,doctor1' said he1 #8as ,i believe you would not choose to tell anything but the truth1 you had better tell him that ,i am dying as fast as my enemies1 if ,i have any1 could wish1 and as easily and as cheerfully as my best friends could desire4' ,colonel ,edmondstone soon afterwards came to see him1 and took leave of him2 and on his way home he could not forbear writing him a letter bidding him once more an eternal adieu1 and applying to him1 as a dying man1 the beautiful ,french verses in which the ,abb ,chaulieu1 in expectation of his own death1 laments his approaching separation from his friend1 the ,marquis de la ,fare4 ,mr4 ,hume's magnanimity and firmness were such1 that his most affectionate friends knew that they hazarded nothing in talking or writing to him as to a dying man1 and that1 so far from being hurt by this frankness1 he was rather pleased and flattered by it4 ,i happened to come into his room while he was reading this letter1 which he had just received1 and which he immediately showed me4 ,i told him that though ,i was sensible how very much he was weakened1 and that appearances were in many respects very bad yet his cheerfulness was still so great1 the spirit of life seemed still to be so very strong in him1 that ,i could not help entertaining some faint hopes4 ,he answered--#8,your hopes are groundless4 ,an habitual diarrha of more than a year's standing would be a very bad disease at any age3 at my age it is a mortal one4 ,when ,i lie down in the evening1 ,i feel myself weaker than when ,i rose in the morning2 and when ,i rise in the morning1 weaker than when ,i lay down in the evening4 ,i am sensible1 besides1 that some of my vital parts are affected1 so that ,i must soon die4' #8,well1' said ,i1 #8if it must be so1 you have at least the satisfaction of leaving all your friends1 your brother's family in particular1 in great prosperity4' ,he said that he felt that satisfaction so sensibly1 that when he was reading a few days before1 ,lucian's ,dialogues of the ,dead1 among all the excuses which are alleged to ,charon for not entering readily into his boat1 he could not find one that fitted him3 he had no house to finish1 he had no daughter to provide for1 he had no enemies upon whom he wished to revenge himself4 #8,i could not well imagine1' said he1 #8what excuse ,i could make to ,charon in order to obtain a little delay4 ,i have done everything of consequence which ,i ever meant to do2 and ,i could at no time expect to leave my relations and friends in a better situation than that in which ,i am now like to leave them2 ,i therefore have all reason to die contented4' ,he then diverted himself with inventing several jocular excuses1 which he supposed he might make to ,charon1 and with imagining the very surly answers which it might suit the character of ,charon to return to them4 #8,upon further consideration1' said he1 #8,i thought ,i might say to him1 good ,charon1 ,i have been correcting my works for a new edition2 allow me a little time that ,i may see how the public receives the alterations4' ,but ,charon would answer1 #8,when you have seen the effect of these1 you will be for making other alterations4 ,there will be no end of such excuses2 so1 honest friend1 please step into the boat4' ,but ,i might still urge1 #8,have a little patience1 good ,charon2 ,i have been endeavouring to open the eyes of the public4 ,if ,i live a few years longer1 ,i may have the satisfaction of seeing the downfall of some of the prevailing systems of superstition4' ,but ,charon would then lose all temper and decency4 #8,you loitering rogue2 that will not happen these many hundred years4 ,do you fancy ,i will grant you a lease for so long a term8 ,get into the boat this instant1 you lazy1 loitering rogue4' 8,but though ,mr4 ,hume always talked of his approaching dissolution with great cheerfulness1 he never affected to make any parade of his magnanimity4 ,he never mentioned the subject but when the conversation naturally led to it1 and never dwelt longer upon it than the course of the conversation happened to require2 it was a subject1 indeed1 which occurred pretty frequently1 in consequence of the inquiries which his friends who came to see him naturally made concerning the state of his health4 ,the conversation which ,i mentioned above1 and which passed on ,thursday the #hth of ,august1 was the last except one that ,i ever had with him4 ,he had now become so very weak that the company of his most intimate friends fatigued him2 for his cheerfulness was still so great1 his complaisance and social disposition were still so entire1 that when any friend was with him he could not help talking more1 and with greater exertion than suited the weakness of his body4 ,at his own desire1 therefore1 ,i agreed to leave ,edinburgh1 where ,i was staying partly upon his account1 and returned to my mother's house here1 at ,kirkcaldy1 upon condition that he would send for me whenever he wished to see me2 the physician who saw him most frequently1 ,dr4 ,black1 undertaking in the meantime to write me occasionally an account of the state of his health4 8,on the #bbnd of ,august the doctor wrote me the following letter3-- 8#8,since my last ,mr4 ,hume has passed his time pretty easily1 but is much weaker4 ,he sits up1 goes downstairs once a day1 and amuses himself with reading1 but seldom sees anybody4 ,he finds that even the conversation of his most intimate friends fatigues and oppresses him2 and it is happy that he does not need it1 for he is quite free from anxiety1 impatience1 or low spirits1 and passes his time very well with the assistance of amusing books4' 8,i received the day after a letter from ,mr4 ,hume himself1 of which the following is an extract3-- 8#8,,edinburgh1 ,august #bc1 #aggf4 8#8,,my ,,dearest ,,friend1--,i am obliged to make use of my nephew's hand in writing to you1 as ,i do not rise to-day4 8#8,i go very fast to decline1 and last night had a small fever1 which ,i hoped might put a quicker period to this tedious illness2 but unluckily it has1 in a great measure1 gone off4 ,i cannot submit to your coming over here on my account1 as it is possible for me to see you so small a part of the day1 but ,dr4 ,black can better inform you concerning the degree of strength which may from time to time remain with me4 ,adieu1 etc4' 8,three days after ,i received the following letter from ,dr4 ,black3-- 8#8,,edinburgh1 ,august #bfth1 #aggf4 8#8,,dear ,,sir1--,yesterday1 about four o'clock afternoon1 ,mr4 ,hume expired4 ,the near approach of his death became evident in the night between ,thursday and ,friday1 when his disease became excessive1 and soon weakened him so much that he could no longer rise out of his bed4 ,he continued to the last perfectly sensible1 and free from much pain or feeling of distress4 ,he never dropped the smallest expression of impatience1 but when he had occasion to speak to the people about him always did it with affection and tenderness4 ,i thought it improper to write to bring you over1 especially as ,i heard that he had dictated a letter to you desiring you not to come4 ,when he became very weak it cost him an effort to speak1 and he died in such a happy composure of mind that nothing could exceed it6' 8,thus died our most excellent and never-to-be-forgotten friend1 concerning whose philosophical opinions men will1 no doubt1 judge variously1 every one approving or condemning them according as they happen to coincide or disagree with his own2 but concerning whose character and conduct there can scarce be a difference of opinion4 ,his temper1 indeed1 seemed to be more happily balanced--if ,i may be allowed such an expression--than that perhaps of any other man ,i have ever known4 ,even in the lowest state of his fortune his great and necessary frugality never hindered him from exercising1 upon proper occasions1 acts both of charity and generosity4 ,it was a frugality founded not upon avarice but upon the love of independency4 ,the extreme gentleness of his nature never weakened either the firmness of his mind or the steadiness of his resolutions4 ,his constant pleasantry was the genuine effusion of good-nature and good-humour tempered with delicacy and modesty1 and without even the slightest tincture of malignity--so frequently the disagreeable source of what is called wit in other men4 ,it never was the meaning of his raillery to mortify1 and therefore1 far from offending1 it seldom failed to please and delight even those who were the object of it4 ,to his friends--who were frequently the object of it--there was not perhaps any one of all his great and amiable qualities which contributed more to endear his conversation4 ,and that gaiety of temper1 so agreeable in society1 but which is so often accompanied with frivolous and superficial qualities1 was in him certainly attended with the most severe application1 the most extensive learning1 the greatest depth of thought1 and a capacity in every respect the most comprehensive4 ,upon the whole1 ,i have always considered him1 both in his lifetime and since his death1 as approaching as nearly to the idea of a perfectly wise and virtuous man as perhaps the nature of human frailty will permit4 8,i ever am1 dear sir1 most affectionately yours1 8,,adam ,,smith40 8,it is a usual fallacy10 says ,hume in 8,of the ,populousness of ,ancient ,nations10 8to consider all the ages of antiquity as one period40 ,the dates given in the ,appendix may serve as a corrective in this regard4 ,,notes1 ,,introduction4 #a ,life of ,adam ,smith1 8,great ,writers0 series4 #b ,life and ,correspondence of ,david ,hume1 #ahdf4 #c ,see ,foundations of ,political ,economy1 ,the ,walter ,scott ,publishing ,company1 ,limited4 #d ,his ,treatise of ,human ,nature1 regarding the publication of which he wrote in #agea to ,sir ,gilbert ,elliot1 of ,minto--8,i was carried away by the heat of youth and invention to publish too precipitately4 ,so vast an undertaking1 planned before ,i was one-and-twenty1 and composed before ,i was twenty-five1 must necessarily be very defective4 ,i have repented my haste a hundred and a hundred times40 #e ,haldane1 ,life of ,adam ,smith1 8,great ,writers0 series4 #f ,hume's view is the juster here4 ,,hume',s ,,political ,,discourses ,illustration1 ornamental ,,of ,,commerce4 ,the greatest part of mankind may be divided into two classes3 that of shallow thinkers1 who fall short of the truth2 and that of abstruse thinkers1 who go beyond it4 ,the latter class are by far the most uncommon2 and ,i may add1 by far the most useful and valuable4 ,they suggest hints1 at least1 and start difficulties1 which they want1 perhaps1 skill to pursue2 but which may produce very fine discoveries1 when handled by men who have a more just way of thinking4 ,at worst1 what they say is uncommon2 and if it should cost some pains to comprehend it1 one has1 however1 the pleasure of hearing something that is new4 ,an author is little to be valued who tells us nothing but what we can learn from every coffee-house conversation4 ,all people of shallow thought are apt to decry even those of solid understanding1 as abstruse thinkers1 and metaphysicians1 and refiners2 and never will allow anything to be just which is beyond their own weak conceptions4 ,there are some cases1 ,i own1 where an extraordinary refinement affords a strong presumption of falsehood1 and where no reasoning is to be trusted but what is natural and easy4 ,when a man deliberates concerning his conduct in any particular affair1 and forms schemes in politics1 trade1 economy1 or any business in life1 he never ought to draw his arguments too fine1 or connect too long a chain of consequences together4 ,something is sure to happen that will disconcert his reasoning1 and produce an event different from what he expected4 ,but when we reason upon general subjects1 one may justly affirm that our speculations can scarce ever be too fine1 provided they be just2 and that the difference between a common man and a man of genius is chiefly seen in the shallowness or depth of the principles upon which they proceed4 ,general reasonings seem intricate1 merely because they are general2 nor is it easy for the bulk of mankind to distinguish1 in a great number of particulars1 that common circumstance in which they all agree1 or to extract it1 pure and unmixed1 from the other superfluous circumstances4 ,every judgment or conclusion1 with them1 is particular4 ,they cannot enlarge their view to those universal propositions which comprehend under them an infinite number of individuals1 and include a whole science in a single theorem4 ,their eye is confounded with such an extensive prospect2 and the conclusions derived from it1 even though clearly expressed1 seem intricate and obscure4 ,but however intricate they may seem1 it is certain that general principles1 if just and sound1 must always prevail in the general course of things1 though they may fail in particular cases2 and it is the chief business of philosophers to regard the general course of things4 ,i may add that it is also the chief business of politicians2 especially in the domestic government of the state1 where the public good1 which is1 or ought to be1 their object1 depends on the concurrence of a multitude of cases2 not1 as in foreign politics1 on accidents and chances1 and the caprices of a few persons4 ,this therefore makes the difference between particular deliberations and general reasonings1 and renders subtlety and refinement much more suitable to the latter than to the former4 ,i thought this introduction necessary before the following discourses on commerce1 money1 interest1 balance of trade1 etc41 where1 perhaps1 there will occur some principles which are uncommon1 and which may seem too refined and subtle for such vulgar subjects4 ,if false1 let them be rejected2 but no one ought to entertain a prejudice against them merely because they are out of the common road4 ,the greatness of a state1 and the happiness of its subjects1 however independent they may be supposed in some respects1 are commonly allowed to be inseparable with regard to commerce2 and as private men receive greater security in the possession of their trade and riches from the power of the public1 so the public becomes powerful in proportion to the riches and extensive commerce of private men4 ,this maxim is true in general1 though ,i cannot forbear thinking that it may possibly admit of some exceptions1 and that we often establish it with too little reserve and limitation4 ,there may be some circumstances where the commerce1 and riches1 and luxury of individuals1 instead of adding strength to the public1 will serve only to thin its armies1 and diminish its authority among the neighbouring nations4 ,man is a very variable being1 and susceptible of many different opinions1 principles1 and rules of conduct4 ,what may be true while he adheres to one way of thinking will be found false when he has embraced an opposite set of manners and opinions4 ,the bulk of every state may be divided into husbandmen and manufacturers4 ,the former are employed in the culture of the land2 the latter work up the materials furnished by the former1 into all the commodities which are necessary and ornamental to human life4 ,as soon as men quit their savage state1 where they live chiefly by hunting and fishing1 they must fall into these two classes2 though the arts of agriculture employ at first the most numerous part of the society4#g ,time and experience improve so much these arts1 that the land may easily maintain a much greater number of men than those who are immediately employed in its cultivation1 or who furnish the more necessary manufactures to such as are so employed4 ,if these superfluous hands apply themselves to the finer arts1 which are commonly denominated the arts of luxury1 they add to the happiness of the state1 since they afford to many the opportunity of receiving enjoyments with which they would otherwise have been unacquainted4 ,but may not another scheme be proposed for the employment of these superfluous hands8 ,may not the sovereign lay claim to them1 and employ them in fleets and armies1 to increase the dominions of the state abroad1 and spread its fame over distant nations8 ,it is certain that the fewer desires and wants are found in the proprietors and labourers of land1 the fewer hands do they employ2 and consequently the superfluities of the land1 instead of maintaining tradesmen and manufacturers1 may support fleets and armies to a much greater extent than where a great many arts are required to minister to the luxury of particular persons4 ,here therefore seems to be a kind of opposition between the greatness of the state and the happiness of the subjects4 ,a state is never greater than when all its superfluous hands are employed in the service of the public4 ,the ease and convenience of private persons require that these hands should be employed in their service4 ,the one can never be satisfied but at the expense of the other4 ,as the ambition of the sovereign must entrench on the luxury of individuals1 so the luxury of individuals must diminish the force and check the ambition of the sovereign4 ,nor is this reasoning merely chimerical1 but is founded on history and experience4 ,the republic of ,sparta was certainly more powerful than any state now in the world1 consisting of an equal number of people1 and this was owing entirely to the want of commerce and luxury4 ,the ,helotes were the labourers3 the ,spartans were the soldiers or gentlemen4 ,it is evident that the labour of the ,helotes could not have maintained so great a number of ,spartans1 had these latter lived in ease and delicacy and given employment to a great variety of trades and manufactures4 ,the like policy may be remarked in ,rome4 ,and indeed1 through all ancient history1 it is observable that the smallest republics raised and maintained greater armies than states consisting of triple the number of inhabitants are able to support at present4 ,it is computed that in all ,european nations the proportion between soldiers and people does not exceed one to a hundred4 ,but we read that the city of ,rome alone1 with its small territory1 raised and maintained1 in early times1 ten legions against the ,latins4 ,athens1 whose whole dominions were not larger than ,yorkshire1 sent to the expedition against ,sicily near forty thousand men4 ,dionysius the elder1 it is said1 maintained a standing army of a hundred thousand foot and ten thousand horse1 besides a large fleet of four hundred sail1#h though his territories extended no farther than the city of ,syracuse1 about a third part of the island of ,sicily1 and some seaport towns or garrisons on the coast of ,italy and ,illyricum4 ,it is true the ancient armies1 in time of war1 subsisted much upon plunder2 but did not the enemy plunder in their turn8 which was a more ruinous way of levying tax than any other that could be devised4 ,in short1 no probable reason can be assigned for the great power of the more ancient states above the modern but their want of commerce and luxury4 ,few artisans were maintained by the labour of the farmers1 and therefore more soldiers might live upon it4 ,titus ,livius says that ,rome1 in his time1 would find it difficult to raise as large an army as that which1 in her early days1 she sent out against the ,gauls and ,latins4 ,instead of those soldiers who fought for liberty and empire in ,camillus's time1 there were in ,augustus's days musicians1 painters1 cooks1 players1 and tailors2 and if the land was equally cultivated at both periods1 it is evident it could maintain equal numbers in the one profession as in the other4 ,they added nothing to the mere necessaries of life in the latter period more than in the former4 ,it is natural on this occasion to ask whether sovereigns may not return to the maxims of ancient policy1 and consult their own interest in this respect more than the happiness of their subjects4 ,i answer that it appears to me almost impossible2 and that because ancient policy was violent1 and contrary to the more natural and usual course of things4 ,it is well known with what peculiar laws ,sparta was governed1 and what a prodigy that republic is justly esteemed by every one who has considered human nature1 as it has displayed itself in other nations and other ages4 ,were the testimony of history less positive and circumstantial1 such a government would appear a mere philosophical whim or fiction1 and impossible ever to be reduced to practice4 ,and though the ,roman and other ancient republics were supported on principles somewhat more natural1 yet was there a very extraordinary concurrence of circumstances to make them submit to such grievous burdens4 ,they were free states2 they were small ones2 and the age being martial1 all the neighbouring states were continually in arms4 ,freedom naturally begets public spirit1 especially in small states2 and this public spirit1 this amor patri1 must increase when the public is almost in continual alarm1 and men are obliged every moment to expose themselves to the greatest dangers for its defence4 ,a continual succession of wars makes every citizen a soldier3 he takes the field in his turn1 and during his service is chiefly maintained by himself4 ,and notwithstanding that his service is equivalent to a very severe tax1 it is less felt by a people addicted to arms1 who fight for honour and revenge more than pay1 and are unacquainted with gain and industry as well as pleasure4#i ,not to mention the great equality of fortunes amongst the inhabitants of the ancient republics1 where every field belonging to a different proprietor was able to maintain a family1 and rendered the numbers of citizens very considerable1 even without trade and manufactures4 ,but though the want of trade and manufactures1 amongst a free and very martial people1 may sometimes have no other effect than to render the public more powerful1 it is certain that1 in the common course of human affairs1 it will have a quite contrary tendency4 ,sovereigns must take mankind as they find them1 and cannot pretend to introduce any violent change in their principles and ways of thinking4 ,a long course of time1 with a variety of accidents and circumstances1 is requisite to produce those great revolutions which so much diversify the face of human affairs4 ,and the less natural any set of principles are which support a particular society1 the more difficulty will a legislator meet with in raising and cultivating them4 ,it is his best policy to comply with the common bent of mankind1 and give it all the improvements of which it is susceptible4 ,now1 according to the most natural course of things1 industry1 and arts1 and trade increase the power of the sovereign as well as the happiness of the subjects2 and that policy is violent which aggrandizes the public by the poverty of individuals4 ,this will easily appear from a few considerations1 which will present to us the consequences of sloth and barbarity4 ,where manufactures and mechanic arts are not cultivated1 the bulk of the people must apply themselves to agriculture2 and if their skill and industry increase1 there must arise a great superfluity from their labour beyond what suffices to maintain them4 ,they have no temptation1 therefore1 to increase their skill and industry2 since they cannot exchange that superfluity for any commodities which may serve either to their pleasure or vanity4 ,a habit of indolence naturally prevails4 ,the greater part of the land lies uncultivated4 ,what is cultivated yields not its utmost1 for want of skill or assiduity in the farmer4 ,if at any time the public exigencies require that great numbers should be employed in the public service1 the labour of the people furnishes now no superfluities by which these numbers can be maintained4 ,the labourers cannot increase their skill and industry on a sudden4 ,lands uncultivated cannot be brought into tillage for some years4 ,the armies1 meanwhile1 must either make sudden and violent conquests1 or disband for want of subsistence4 ,a regular attack or defence1 therefore1 is not to be expected from such a people1 and their soldiers must be as ignorant and unskilful as their farmers and manufacturers4 ,everything in the world is purchased by labour1 and our passions are the only causes of labour4 ,when a nation abounds in manufactures and mechanic arts1 the proprietors of land1 as well as the farmers1 study agriculture as a science1 and redouble their industry and attention4 ,the superfluity which arises from their labour is not lost1 but is exchanged with the manufacturers for those commodities which men's luxury now makes them covet4 ,by this means land furnishes a great deal more of the necessaries of life than what suffices for those who cultivate it4 ,in times of peace and tranquillity this superfluity goes to the maintenance of manufacturers1 and the improvers of liberal arts4 ,but it is easy for the public to convert many of these manufacturers into soldiers1 and maintain them by that superfluity which arises from the labour of the farmers4 ,accordingly we find that this is the case in all civilized governments4 ,when the sovereign raises an army1 what is the consequence8 ,he imposes a tax4 ,this tax obliges all the people to retrench what is least necessary to their subsistence4 ,those who labour in such commodities must either enlist in the troops or turn themselves to agriculture1 and thereby oblige some labourers to enlist for want of business4 ,and to consider the matter abstractly1 manufactures increase the power of the state only as they store up so much labour1 and that of a kind to which the public may lay claim1 without depriving any one of the necessaries of life4 ,the more labour1 therefore1 is employed beyond mere necessaries1 the more powerful is any state2 since the persons engaged in that labour may easily be converted to the public service4 ,in a state without manufactures there may be the same number of hands2 but there is not the same quantity of labour1 nor of the same kind4 ,all the labour is there bestowed upon necessaries1 which can admit of little or no abatement4 ,thus the greatness of the sovereign and the happiness of the state are1 in a great measure1 united with regard to trade and manufactures4 ,it is a violent method1 and in most cases impracticable1 to oblige the labourer to toil in order to raise from the land more than what subsists himself and family4 ,furnish him with manufactures and commodities1 and he will do it of himself4 ,afterwards you will find it easy to seize some part of his superfluous labour1 and employ it in the public service1 without giving him his wonted return4 ,being accustomed to industry1 he will think this less grievous than if1 at once1 you obliged him to an augmentation of labour without any reward4 ,the case is the same with regard to the other members of the state4 ,the greater is the stock of labour of all kinds1 the greater quantity may be taken from the heap without making any sensible alteration upon it4 ,a public granary of corn1 a storehouse of cloth1 a magazine of arms2 all these must be allowed real riches and strength in any state4 ,trade and industry are really nothing but a stock of labour1 which1 in time of peace and tranquillity1 is employed for the ease and satisfaction of individuals2 but in the exigencies of state1 may1 in part1 be turned to public advantage4 ,could we convert a city into a kind of fortified camp1 and infuse into each breast so martial a genius1 and such a passion for public good1 as to make every one willing to undergo the greatest hardships for the sake of the public1 these affections might now1 as in ancient times1 prove alone a sufficient spur to industry1 and support the community4 ,it would then be advantageous1 as in camps1 to banish all arts and luxury2 and1 by restrictions on equipage and tables1 make the provisions and forage last longer than if the army were loaded with a number of superfluous retainers4 ,but as these principles are too disinterested and too difficult to support1 it is requisite to govern men by other passions1 and animate them with a spirit of avarice and industry1 art and luxury4 ,the camp is1 in this case1 loaded with a superfluous retinue2 but the provisions flow in proportionately larger4 ,the harmony of the whole is still supported1 and the natural bent of the mind being more complied with1 individuals1 as well as the public1 find their account in the observance of those maxims4 ,the same method of reasoning will let us see the advantage of foreign commerce1 in augmenting the power of the state1 as well as the riches and happiness of the subjects4 ,it increases the stock of labour in the nation1 and the sovereign may convert what share of it he finds necessary to the service of the public4 ,foreign trade1 by its imports1 furnishes materials for new manufactures2 and by its exports1 it produces labour in particular commodities which could not be consumed at home4 ,in short1 a kingdom that has a large import and export must abound more with industry1 and that employed upon delicacies and luxuries1 than a kingdom which rests contented with its native commodities4 ,it is1 therefore1 more powerful1 as well as richer and happier4 ,the individuals reap the benefit of these commodities1 so far as they gratify the senses and appetites4 ,and the public is also a gainer1 while a greater stock of labour is1 by this means1 stored up against any public exigency2 that is1 a greater number of laborious men are maintained1 who may be diverted to the public service without robbing any one of the necessaries or even the chief conveniences of life4 ,if we consult history1 we shall find that in most nations foreign trade has preceded any refinement in home manufactures1 and given birth to domestic luxury4 ,the temptation is stronger to make use of foreign commodities1 which are ready for use1 and which are entirely new to us1 than to make improvements on any domestic commodity1 which always advance by slow degrees1 and never affect us by their novelty4 ,the profit is also very great in exporting what is superfluous at home1 and what bears no price1 to foreign nations1 whose soil or climate is not favourable to that commodity4 ,thus men become acquainted with the pleasures of luxury and the profits of commerce2 and their delicacy and industry1 being once awakened1 carry them to farther improvements in every branch of domestic as well as foreign trade4 ,and this perhaps is the chief advantage which arises from a commerce with strangers4 ,it rouses men from their indolence2 and presenting the gayer and more opulent part of the nation with objects of luxury1 which they never before dreamed of1 raises in them a desire of a more splendid way of life than what their ancestors enjoyed2 and at the same time the few merchants who possess the secret of this importation and exportation make exorbitant profits1 and becoming rivals in wealth to the ancient nobility1 tempt other adventurers to become their rivals in commerce4 ,imitation soon diffuses all those arts2 while domestic manufacturers emulate the foreign in their improvements1 and work up every home commodity to the utmost perfection of which it is susceptible4 ,their own steel and iron1 in such laborious hands1 becomes equal to the gold and rubies of the ,indies4 ,when the affairs of the society are once brought to this situation1 a nation may lose most of its foreign trade1 and yet continue a great and powerful people4 ,if strangers will not take any particular commodity of ours1 we must cease to labour in it4 ,the same hands will turn themselves towards some refinement in other commodities which may be wanted at home4 ,and there must always be materials for them to work upon2 till every person in the state1 who possesses riches1 enjoys as great plenty of home commodities1 and those in as great perfection1 as he desires2 which can never possibly happen4 ,china is represented as one of the most flourishing empires in the world1 though it has very little commerce beyond its own territories4 ,it will not1 ,i hope1 be considered as a superfluous digression1 if ,i here observe1 that as the multitude of mechanical arts is advantageous1 so is the great number of persons to whose share the productions of these arts fall4 ,a too great disproportion among the citizens weakens any state4 ,every person1 if possible1 ought to enjoy the fruits of his labour1 in a full possession of all the necessaries1 and many of the conveniences of life4 ,no one can doubt but such an equality is most suitable to human nature1 and diminishes much less from the happiness of the rich than it adds to that of the poor4 ,it also augments the power of the state1 and makes any extraordinary taxes or impositions be paid with much more cheerfulness4 ,where the riches are engrossed by a few1 these must contribute very largely to the supplying the public necessities4 ,but when the riches are dispersed among multitudes1 the burden feels light on every shoulder1 and the taxes make not a very sensible difference on any one's way of living4 ,add to this1 that where the riches are in few hands these must enjoy all the power1 and will readily conspire to lay the whole burden on the poor1 and oppress them still farther1 to the discouragement of all industry4 ,in this circumstance consists the great advantage of ,england above any nation at present in the world1 or that appears in the records of story4 ,it is true1 the ,english feel some disadvantages in foreign trade by the high price of labour1 which is in part the effect of the riches of their artisans1 as well as of the plenty of money2 but as foreign trade is not the most material circumstance1 it is not to be put in competition with the happiness of so many millions4 ,and if there were no more to endear to them that free government under which they live1 this alone were sufficient4 ,the poverty of the common people is a natural1 if not an infallible effect of absolute monarchy2 though ,i doubt whether it be always true1 on the other hand1 that their riches are an infallible result of liberty4 ,liberty must be attended with particular accidents1 and a certain turn of thinking1 in order to produce that effect4 ,lord ,bacon1 accounting for the great advantages obtained by the ,english in their wars with ,france1 ascribes them chiefly to the superior ease and plenty of the common people amongst the former2 yet the governments of the two kingdoms were1 at that time1 pretty much alike4 ,where the labourers and artisans are accustomed to work for low wages1 and to retain but a small part of the fruits of their labour1 it is difficult for them1 even in a free government1 to better their condition1 or conspire among themselves to heighten their wages4 ,but even where they are accustomed to a more plentiful way of life1 it is easy for the rich1 in a despotic government1 to conspire against them1 and throw the whole burden of the taxes on their shoulders4 ,it may seem an odd position1 that the poverty of the common people in ,france1 ,italy1 and ,spain is1 in some measure1 owing to the superior riches of the soil and happiness of the climate2 and yet there want not many reasons to justify this paradox4 ,in such a fine mould or soil as that of those more southern regions1 agriculture is an easy art2 and one man1 with a couple of sorry horses1 will be able1 in a season1 to cultivate as much land as will pay a pretty considerable rent to the proprietor4 ,all the art1 which the farmer knows1 is to leave his ground fallow for a year1 so soon as it is exhausted2 and the warmth of the sun alone and temperature of the climate enrich it1 and restore its fertility4 ,such poor peasants1 therefore1 require only a simple maintenance for their labour4 ,they have no stock nor riches1 which claim more2 and at the same time1 they are for ever dependent on their landlord1 who gives no leases1 nor fears that his land will be spoiled by the ill methods of cultivation4 ,in ,england1 the land is rich1 but coarse2 must be cultivated at a great expense2 and produces slender crops1 when not carefully managed1 and by a method which gives not the full profit but in a course of several years4 ,a farmer1 therefore1 in ,england must have a considerable stock and a long lease2 which beget proportional profits4 ,the fine vineyards of ,champagne and ,burgundy1 that oft yield to the landlord above five pounds per acre1 are cultivated by peasants who have scarce bread2 and the reason is1 that such peasants need no stock but their own limbs1 with instruments of husbandry which they can buy for twenty shillings4 ,the farmers are commonly in some better circumstances in those countries2 but the graziers are most at their ease of all those who cultivate the land4 ,the reason is still the same4 ,men must have profits proportionable to their expense and hazard4 ,where so considerable a number of labouring poor as the peasants and farmers are in very low circumstances1 all the rest must partake of their poverty whether the government of that nation be monarchical or republican4 ,we may form a similar remark with regard to the general history of mankind4 ,what is the reason why no people living between the tropics could ever yet attain to any art or civility1 or reach even any police in their government1 and any military discipline2 while few nations in the temperate climates have been altogether deprived of these advantages8 ,it is probable that one cause of this phenomenon is the warmth and equality of weather in the torrid zone1 which render clothes and houses less requisite for the inhabitants1 and thereby remove1 in part1 that necessity which is the great spur to industry and invention4 ,curis acuens mortalia corda4 ,not to mention that the fewer goods or possessions of this kind any people enjoy1 the fewer quarrels are likely to arise amongst them1 and the less necessity will there be for a settled police or regular authority to protect and defend them from foreign enemies1 or from each other4 ,,notes1 ,,of ,,commerce4 #g ,monsieur ,melon1 in his political essay on commerce1 asserts that even at present1 if you divide ,france into twenty parts1 sixteen are labourers or peasants1 two only artisans1 one belonging to the law1 church1 and military1 and one merchants1 financiers1 and bourgeois4 ,this calculation is certainly very erroneous4 ,in ,france1 ,england1 and indeed most parts of ,europe1 half of the inhabitants live in cities2 and even of those who live in the country1 a very great number are artisans1 perhaps above a third4 #h ,diod4 ,sic41 lib4 #b4 ,this account1 ,i own1 is somewhat suspicious1 not to say worse1 chiefly because this army was not composed of citizens1 but of mercenary forces4 #i ,the more ancient ,romans lived in perpetual war with all their neighbours2 and in old ,latin the term 8hostis0 expressed both a stranger and an enemy4 ,this is remarked by ,cicero2 but by him is ascribed to the humanity of his ancestors1 who softened1 as much as possible1 the denomination of an enemy by calling him by the same appellation which signified a stranger4 7,de ,off41 lib4 #b47 ,it is1 however1 much more probable1 from the manners of the times1 that the ferocity of those people was so great as to make them regard all strangers as enemies1 and call them by the same name4 ,it is not1 besides1 consistent with the most common maxims of policy or of nature that any state should regard its public enemies with a friendly eye1 or preserve any such sentiments for them as the ,roman orator would ascribe to his ancestors4 ,not to mention that the early ,romans really exercised piracy1 as we learn from their first treaties with ,carthage1 preserved by ,polybius1 lib4 #c1 and consequently1 like the ,sallee and ,algerine rovers1 were actually at war with most nations1 and a stranger and an enemy were with them almost synonymous4 ,,of ,,refinement ,,in ,,the ,,arts4 ,luxury is a word of a very uncertain signification1 and may be taken in a good as well as in a bad sense4 ,in general1 it means great refinement in the gratification of the senses1 and any degree of it may be innocent or blameable1 according to the age1 or country1 or condition of the person4 ,the bounds between the virtue and the vice cannot here be fixed exactly1 more than in other moral subjects4 ,to imagine that the gratifying any of the senses1 or the indulging any delicacy in meats1 drinks1 or apparel1 is in itself a vice1 can never enter into a head that is not disordered by the frenzies of enthusiasm4 ,i have1 indeed1 heard of a monk abroad who1 because the windows of his cell opened upon a very noble prospect1 made a covenant with his eyes never to turn that way1 or receive so sensual a gratification4 ,and such is the crime of drinking champagne or burgundy1 preferably to small beer or porter4 ,these indulgences are only vices when they are pursued at the expense of some virtue1 as liberality or charity2 in like manner as they are follies when for them a man ruins his fortune1 and reduces himself to want and beggary4 ,where they entrench upon no virtue1 but leave ample subject whence to provide for friends1 family1 and every proper object of generosity or compassion1 they are entirely innocent1 and have in every age been acknowledged such by almost all moralists4 ,to be entirely occupied with the luxury of the table1 for instance1 without any relish for the pleasures of ambition1 study1 or conversation1 is a mark of gross stupidity1 and is incompatible with any vigour of temper or genius4 ,to confine one's expense entirely to such a gratification1 without regard to friends or family1 is an indication of a heart entirely devoid of humanity or benevolence4 ,but if a man reserve time sufficient for all laudable pursuits1 and money sufficient for all generous purposes1 he is free from every shadow of blame or reproach4 ,since luxury may be considered either as innocent or blameable1 one may be surprised at those preposterous opinions which have been entertained concerning it2 while men of libertine principles bestow praises even on vicious luxury1 and represent it as highly advantageous to society2 and on the other hand1 men of severe morals blame even the most innocent luxury1 and regard it as the source of all the corruptions1 disorders1 and factions incident to civil government4 ,we shall here endeavour to correct both these extremes1 by proving1 first1 that the ages of refinement are both the happiest and most virtuous2 secondly1 that wherever luxury ceases to be innocent1 it also ceases to be beneficial2 and when carried a degree too far1 is a quality pernicious1 though perhaps not the most pernicious1 to political society4 ,to prove the first point1 we need but consider the effects of refinement both on private and on public life4 ,human happiness1 according to the most received notions1 seems to consist in three ingredients3 action1 pleasure1 and indolence2 and though these ingredients ought to be mixed in different proportions1 according to the particular dispositions of the person1 yet no one ingredient can be entirely wanting without destroying1 in some measure1 the relish of the whole composition4 ,indolence or repose1 indeed1 seems not of itself to contribute much to our enjoyment2 but1 like sleep1 is requisite as an indulgence to the weakness of human nature1 which cannot support an uninterrupted course of business or pleasure4 ,that quick march of the spirits which takes a man from himself1 and chiefly gives satisfaction1 does in the end exhaust the mind1 and requires some intervals of repose1 which1 though agreeable for a moment1 yet1 if prolonged1 beget a languor and lethargy that destroy all enjoyment4 ,education1 custom1 and example have a mighty influence in turning the mind to any of these pursuits2 and it must be owned1 that where they promote a relish for action and pleasure1 they are so far favourable to human happiness4 ,in times when industry and arts flourish1 men are kept in perpetual occupation1 and enjoy1 as their reward1 the occupation itself1 as well as those pleasures which are the fruits of their labour4 ,the mind acquires new vigour2 enlarges its powers and faculties2 and by an assiduity in honest industry1 both satisfies its natural appetites and prevents the growth of unnatural ones1 which commonly spring up when nourished with ease and idleness4 ,banish those arts from society1 you deprive men both of action and of pleasure2 and leaving nothing but indolence in their place1 you even destroy the relish of indolence1 which never is agreeable but when it succeeds to labour1 and recruits the spirits1 exhausted by too much application and fatigue4 ,another advantage of industry and of refinements in the mechanical arts is that they commonly produce some refinements in the liberal2 nor can the one be carried to perfection without being accompanied1 in some degree1 with the other4 ,the same age which produces great philosophers and politicians1 renowned generals and poets1 usually abounds with skilful weavers and ship-carpenters4 ,we cannot reasonably expect that a piece of woollen cloth will be wrought to perfection in a nation which is ignorant of astronomy1 or where ethics are neglected4 ,the spirit of the age affects all the arts2 and the minds of men1 being once roused from their lethargy and put into a fermentation1 turn themselves on all sides1 and carry improvements into every art and science4 ,profound ignorance is totally banished1 and men enjoy the privilege of rational creatures1 to think as well as to act1 to cultivate the pleasures of the mind as well as those of the body4 ,the more these refined arts advance1 the more sociable do men become2 nor is it possible that1 when enriched with science and possessed of a fund of conversation1 they should be contented to remain in solitude1 or live with their fellow-citizens in that distant manner which is peculiar to ignorant and barbarous nations4 ,they flock into cities2 love to receive and communicate knowledge2 to show their wit or their breeding2 their taste in conversation or living1 in clothes or furniture4 ,curiosity allures the wise2 vanity the foolish2 and pleasure both4 ,particular clubs and societies are everywhere formed1 both sexes meet in an easy and sociable manner1 and the tempers of men1 as well as their behaviour1 refine apace4 ,so that1 besides the improvements which they receive from knowledge and the liberal arts1 it is impossible but they must feel an increase of humanity from the very habit of conversing together and contributing to each other's pleasure and entertainment4 ,thus industry1 knowledge1 and humanity are linked together by an indissoluble chain1 and are found1 from experience as well as reason1 to be peculiar to the more polished1 and1 what are commonly denominated1 the more luxurious ages4 ,nor are these advantages attended with disadvantages which bear any proportion to them4 ,the more men refine upon pleasure the less will they indulge in excesses of any kind1 because nothing is more destructive to true pleasure than such excesses4 ,one may safely affirm that the ,tartars are oftener guilty of beastly gluttony when they feast on their dead horses than ,european courtiers with all their refinements of cookery4 ,and if libertine love1 or even infidelity to the marriage-bed1 be more frequent in polite ages1 when it is often regarded only as a piece of gallantry1 drunkenness1 on the other hand1 is much less common--a vice more odious and more pernicious both to mind and body4 ,and in this matter ,i would appeal not only to an ,ovid or a ,petronius1 but to a ,seneca or a ,cato4 ,we know that ,csar1 during ,catiline's conspiracy1 being necessitated to put into ,cato's hands a billet-doux which discovered an intrigue with ,servilia1 ,cato's own sister1 that stern philosopher threw it back to him with indignation1 and1 in the bitterness of his wrath1 gave him the appellation of drunkard1 as a term more opprobrious than that with which he could more justly have reproached him4 ,but industry1 knowledge1 and humanity are not advantageous in private life alone2 they diffuse their beneficial influence on the public1 and render the government as great and flourishing as they make individuals happy and prosperous4 ,the increase and consumption of all the commodities which serve to the ornament and pleasure of life are advantageous to society1 because at the same time that they multiply those innocent gratifications to individuals1 they are a kind of storehouse of labour1 which1 in the exigencies of state1 may be turned to the public service4 ,in a nation where there is no demand for such superfluities men sink into indolence1 lose all the enjoyment of life1 and are useless to the public1 which cannot maintain nor support its fleets and armies from the industries of such slothful members4 ,the bounds of all the ,european kingdoms are at present pretty near the same they were two hundred years ago2 but what a difference is there in the power and grandeur of those kingdoms6 ,which can be ascribed to nothing but the increase of art and industry4 ,when ,charles ,,viii4 of ,france invaded ,italy1 he carried with him about #bj1jjj men2 and yet this armament so exhausted the nation1 as we learn from ,guicciardin1 that for some years it was not able to make so great an effort4 ,the late ,king of ,france1 in time of war1 kept in pay above #djj1jjj men1#aj though from ,mazarin's death to his own he was engaged in a course of wars that lasted near thirty years4 ,this industry is much promoted by the knowledge inseparable from the ages of art and refinement2 as1 on the other hand1 this knowledge enables the public to make the best advantage of the industry of its subjects4 ,laws1 order1 police1 discipline--these can never be carried to any degree of perfection before human reason has refined itself by exercise1 and by an application to the more vulgar arts1 at least1 of commerce and manufactures4 ,can we expect that a government will be well modelled by a people who know not how to make a spinning-wheel1 or to employ a loom to advantage8 ,not to mention that all ignorant ages are infested with superstition1 which throws the government off its bias1 and disturbs men in the pursuit of their interest and happiness4 ,knowledge in the arts of government naturally begets mildness and moderation1 by instructing men in the advantages of humane maxims above rigour and severity1 which drive subjects into rebellion1 and render the return to submission impracticable1 by cutting off all hopes of pardon4 ,when the tempers of men are softened as well as their knowledge improved1 this humanity appears still more conspicuous1 and is the chief characteristic which distinguishes a civilized age from times of barbarity and ignorance4 ,factions are then less inveterate1 revolutions less tragical1 authority less severe1 and seditions less frequent4 ,even foreign wars abate of their cruelty2 and after the field of battle1 where honour and interest steel men against compassion as well as fear1 the combatants divest themselves of the brute1 and resume the man4 ,nor need we fear that men1 by losing their ferocity1 will lose their martial spirit1 or become less undaunted and vigorous in defence of their country or their liberty4 ,the arts have no such effect in enervating either the mind or body4 ,on the contrary1 industry1 their inseparable attendant1 adds new force to both4 ,and if anger1 which is said to be the whetstone of courage1 loses somewhat of its asperity by politeness and refinement1 a sense of honour1 which is a stronger1 more constant1 and more governable principle1 acquires fresh vigour by that elevation of genius which arises from knowledge and a good education4 ,add to this that courage can neither have any duration nor be of any use when not accompanied with discipline and martial skill1 which are seldom found among a barbarous people4 ,the ancients remarked that ,datames was the only barbarian that ever knew the art of war4 ,and ,pyrrhus1 seeing the ,romans marshal their army with some art and skill1 said with surprise1 8,these barbarians have nothing barbarous in their discipline60 ,it is observable that as the old ,romans1 by applying themselves solely to war1 were the only uncivilized people that ever possessed military discipline1 so the ,italians are the only civilized people among ,europeans that ever wanted courage and a martial spirit4 ,those who would ascribe this effeminacy of the ,italians to their luxury or politeness1 or application to the arts1 need but consider the ,french and ,english1 whose bravery is as incontestable as their love for luxury and their assiduity in commerce4 ,the ,italian historians give us a more satisfactory reason for this degeneracy of their countrymen4 ,they show us how the sword was dropped at once by all the ,italian sovereigns2 while the ,venetian aristocracy was jealous of its subjects1 the ,florentine democracy applied itself entirely to commerce2 ,rome was governed by priests1 and ,naples by women4 ,war then became the business of soldiers of fortune1 who spared one another1 and1 to the astonishment of the world1 could engage a whole day in what they called a battle1 and return at night to their camp without the least bloodshed4 ,what has chiefly induced severe moralists to declaim against refinement in the arts is the example of ancient ,rome1 which1 joining to its poverty and rusticity1 virtue and public spirit1 rose to such a surprising height of grandeur and liberty2 but having learned from its conquered provinces the ,asiatic luxury1 fell into every kind of corruption1 whence arose sedition and civil wars1 attended at last with the total loss of liberty4 ,all the ,latin classics1 whom we peruse in our infancy1 are full of these sentiments1 and universally ascribe the ruin of their state to the arts and riches imported from the ,east3 insomuch that ,sallust represents a taste for painting as a vice no less than lewdness and drinking4 ,and so popular were these sentiments during the latter ages of the republic1 that this author abounds in praises of the old rigid ,roman virtue1 though himself the most egregious instance of modern luxury and corruption2 speaks contemptuously of the ,grecian eloquence1 though the most eloquent writer in the world2 nay1 employs preposterous digressions and declamations to this purpose1 though a model of taste and correctness4 ,but it would be easy to prove that these writers mistook the cause of the disorders in the ,roman state1 and ascribed to luxury and the arts what really proceeded from an ill-modelled government and the unlimited extent of conquests4 ,refinement on the pleasures and conveniences of life has no natural tendency to beget venality and corruption4 ,the value which all men put upon any particular pleasure depends on comparison and experience2 nor is a porter less greedy of money1 which he spends on bacon and brandy1 than a courtier1 who purchases champagne and ortolans4 ,riches are valuable at all times1 and to all men1 because they always purchase pleasures such as men are accustomed to and desire2 nor can anything restrain or regulate the love of money but a sense of honour and virtue1 which1 if it be not nearly equal at all times1 will naturally abound most in ages of knowledge and refinement4 ,of all ,european kingdoms1 ,poland seems the most defective in the arts of war1 as well as peace1 mechanical as well as liberal2 and yet it is there that venality and corruption do most prevail4 ,the nobles seem to have preserved their crown elective for no other purpose but regularly to sell it to the highest bidder2 this is almost the only species of commerce with which that people are acquainted4 ,the liberties of ,england1 so far from decaying since the improvements in the arts1 have never flourished so much as during that period4 ,and though corruption may seem to increase of late years1 this is chiefly to be ascribed to our established liberty1 when our princes have found the impossibility of governing without parliaments1 or of terrifying parliaments by the phantom of prerogative4 ,not to mention that this corruption or venality prevails infinitely more among the electors than the elected1 and therefore cannot justly be ascribed to any refinements in luxury4 ,if we consider the matter in a proper light1 we shall find that improvements in the arts are rather favourable to liberty1 and have a natural tendency to preserve1 if not produce a free government4 ,in rude1 unpolished nations1 where the arts are neglected1 all the labour is bestowed on the cultivation of the ground2 and the whole society is divided into two classes--proprietors of land and their vassals or tenants4 ,the latter are necessarily dependent1 and fitted for slavery and subjection2 especially where they possess no riches1 and are not valued for their knowledge in agriculture1 as must always be the case where the arts are neglected4 ,the former naturally erect themselves into petty tyrants1 and must either submit to an absolute master for the sake of peace and order1 or if they will preserve their independency1 like the ancient barons1 they must fall into feuds and contests among themselves1 and throw the whole society into such confusion as is perhaps worse than the most despotic government4 ,but where luxury nourishes commerce and industry1 the peasants1 by a proper cultivation of the land1 become rich and independent2 while the tradesmen and merchants acquire a share of the property1 and draw authority and consideration to that middling rank of men1 who are the best and firmest basis of public liberty4 ,these submit not to slavery1 like the poor peasants1 from poverty and meanness of spirit2 and having no hopes of tyrannizing over others1 like the barons1 they are not tempted1 for the sake of that gratification1 to submit to the tyranny of their sovereign4 ,they covet equal laws1 which may secure their property1 and preserve them from monarchical as well as aristocratical tyranny4 ,the ,house of ,commons is the support of our popular government1 and all the world acknowledges that it owed its chief influence and consideration to the increase of commerce1 which threw such a balance of property into the hands of the commons4 ,how inconsistent then is it to blame so violently a refinement in the arts1 and to represent it as the bane of liberty and public spirit6 ,to declaim against present times1 and magnify the virtue of remote ancestors1 is a propensity almost inherent in human nature3 and as the sentiments and opinions of civilized ages alone are transmitted to posterity1 hence it is that we meet with so many severe judgments pronounced against luxury1 and even science2 and hence it is that at present we give so ready an assent to them4 ,but the fallacy is easily perceived from comparing different nations that are contemporaries1 where we both judge more impartially and can better set in opposition those manners with which we are sufficiently acquainted4 ,treachery and cruelty1 the most pernicious and most odious of all vices1 seem peculiar to uncivilized ages2 and by the refined ,greeks and ,romans were ascribed to all the barbarous nations which surrounded them4 ,they might justly1 therefore1 have presumed that their own ancestors1 so highly celebrated1 possessed no greater virtue1 and were as much inferior to their posterity in honour and humanity as in taste and science4 ,an ancient ,frank or ,saxon may be highly extolled2 but ,i believe every man would think his life or fortune much less secure in the hands of a ,moor or ,tartar than in those of a ,french or ,english gentleman1 the rank of men the most civilized in the most civilized nations4 ,we come now to the second position which we proposed to illustrate--viz41 that as innocent luxury1 or a refinement in the arts and conveniences of life1 is advantageous to the public1 so1 wherever luxury ceases to be innocent1 it also ceases to be beneficial2 and when carried a degree farther1 begins to be a quality pernicious1 though perhaps not the most pernicious1 to political society4 ,let us consider what we call vicious luxury4 ,no gratification1 however sensual1 can of itself be esteemed vicious4 ,a gratification is only vicious when it engrosses all a man's expense1 and leaves no ability for such acts of duty and generosity as are required by his situation and fortune4 ,suppose that he correct the vice1 and employ part of his expense in the education of his children1 in the support of his friends1 and in relieving the poor1 would any prejudice result to society8 ,on the contrary1 the same consumption would arise1 and that labour which at present is employed only in producing a slender gratification to one man1 would relieve the necessitous1 and bestow satisfaction on hundreds4 ,the same care and toil which raise a dish of peas at ,christmas would give bread to a whole family during six months4 ,to say that1 without a vicious luxury1 the labour would not have been employed at all1 is only to say that there is some other defect in human nature1 such as indolence1 selfishness1 inattention to others1 for which luxury in some measure provides a remedy1 as one poison may be an antidote to another4 ,but virtue1 like wholesome food1 is better than poisons1 however corrected4 ,suppose the same number of men that are at present in ,britain1 with the same soil and climate3 ,i ask1 is it not possible for them to be happier1 by the most perfect way of life which can be imagined1 and by the greatest reformation which ,omnipotence itself could work in their temper and disposition8 ,to assert that they cannot appears evidently ridiculous4 ,as the land is able to maintain more than all its inhabitants1 they could never1 in such a ,utopian state1 feel any other ills than those which arise from bodily sickness2 and these are not the half of human miseries4 ,all other ills spring from some vice1 either in ourselves or others2 and even many of our diseases proceed from the same origin4 ,remove the vices1 and the ills follow4 ,you must only take care to remove all the vices4 ,if you remove part1 you may render the matter worse4 ,by banishing vicious luxury1 without curing sloth and an indifference to others1 you only diminish industry in the state1 and add nothing to men's charity or their generosity4 ,let us1 therefore1 rest contented with asserting that two opposite vices in a state may be more advantageous than either of them alone2 but let us never pronounce vice in itself advantageous4 ,is it not very inconsistent for an author to assert in one page that moral distinctions are inventions of politicians for public interest1 and in the next page maintain that vice is advantageous to the public8#aa ,and indeed it seems1 upon any system of morality1 little less than a contradiction in terms to talk of a vice which is in general beneficial to society4 ,prodigality is not to be confounded with a refinement in the arts4 ,it even appears that that vice is much less frequent in the cultivated ages4 ,industry and gain beget frugality1 among the lower and middle ranks of men1 and in all the busy professions4 ,men of high rank1 indeed1 it may be pretended1 are more allured by the pleasures1 which become more frequent4 ,but idleness is the great source of prodigality at all times1 and there are pleasures and vanities in every age1 which allure men equally when they are unacquainted with better enjoyments4 ,not to mention that the high interest paid in rude times quickly consumes the fortunes of the landed gentry1 and multiplies their necessities4 ,i thought this reasoning necessary in order to give some light to a philosophical question which has been much disputed in ,britain4 ,i call it a philosophical question1 not a political one2 for whatever may be the consequence of such a miraculous transformation of mankind as would endow them with every species of virtue and free them from every species of vice1 this concerns not the magistrate1 who aims only at possibilities4 ,he cannot cure every vice by substituting a virtue in its place4 ,very often he can only cure one vice by another1 and in that case he ought to prefer what is least pernicious to society4 ,luxury1 when excessive1 is the source of many ills2 but it is in general preferable to sloth and idleness1 which would commonly succeed in its place1 and are more pernicious both to private persons and to the public4 ,when sloth reigns1 a mean1 uncultivated way of life prevails amongst individuals1 without society1 without enjoyment4 ,and if the sovereign1 in such a situation1 demands the service of his subjects1 the labour of the state suffices only to furnish the necessaries of life to the labourers1 and can afford nothing to those who are employed in the public service4 ,,notes1 ,,of ,,refinement ,,in ,,the ,,arts4 #aj ,the inscription on the ,place de ,vendme says #ddj1jjj4 #aa ,fable of the ,bees4 ,,of ,,money4 ,money is not1 properly speaking1 one of the subjects of commerce1 but only the instrument which men have agreed upon to facilitate the exchange of one commodity for another4 ,it is none of the wheels of trade2 it is the oil which renders the motion of the wheels more smooth and easy4 ,if we consider any one kingdom by itself1 it is evident that the greater or less plenty of money is of no consequence1 since the prices of commodities are always proportioned to the plenty of money1 and a crown in ,henry ,,vii4's time served the same purpose as a pound does at present4 ,it is only the public which draws any advantage from the greater plenty of money1 and that only in its wars and negotiations with foreign states4 ,and this is the reason why all rich and trading countries1 from ,carthage to ,britain and ,holland1 have employed mercenary troops1 which they hired from their poorer neighbours4 ,were they to make use of their native subjects1 they would find less advantage from their superior riches1 and from their great plenty of gold and silver1 since the pay of all their servants must rise in proportion to the public opulence4 ,our small army in ,britain of #bj1jjj men is maintained at as great expense as a ,french army thrice as numerous4 ,the ,english fleet1 during the late war1 required as much money to support it as all the ,roman legions which kept the whole world in subjection during the time of the emperors4#ab ,the greater number of people and their greater industry are serviceable in all cases--at home and abroad1 in private and in public4 ,but the greater plenty of money is very limited in its use1 and may even sometimes be a loss to a nation in its commerce with foreigners4 ,there seems to be a happy concurrence of causes in human affairs which checks the growth of trade and riches1 and hinders them from being confined entirely to one people1 as might naturally at first be dreaded from the advantages of an established commerce4 ,where one nation has got the start of another in trade it is very difficult for the latter to regain the ground it has lost1 because of the superior industry and skill of the former1 and the greater stocks of which its merchants are possessed1 and which enable them to trade for so much smaller profits4 ,but these advantages are compensated1 in some measure1 by the low price of labour in every nation which has not an extensive commerce1 and does not very much abound in gold and silver4 ,manufactures1 therefore1 gradually shift their places1 leaving those countries and provinces which they have already enriched1 and flying to others1 whither they are allured by the cheapness of provisions and labour1 till they have enriched these also and are again banished by the same causes4 ,and1 in general1 we may observe that the dearness of everything1 from plenty of money1 is a disadvantage which attends an established commerce1 and sets bounds to it in every country by enabling the poorer states to under-sell the richer in all foreign markets4 ,this has made me entertain a great doubt concerning the benefit of banks and paper-credit1 which are so generally esteemed advantageous to every nation4 ,that provisions and labour should become dear by the increase of trade and money is1 in many respects1 an inconvenience2 but an inconvenience that is unavoidable1 and the effect of that public wealth and prosperity which are the end of all our wishes4 ,it is compensated by the advantages which we reap from the possession of these precious metals1 and the weight which they give the nation in all foreign wars and negotiations4 ,but there appears no reason for increasing that inconvenience by a counterfeit money1 which foreigners will not accept in any payment1 and which any great disorder in the state will reduce to nothing4 ,there are1 it is true1 many people in every rich state who1 having large sums of money1 would prefer paper with good security1 as being of more easy transport and more safe custody4 ,if the public provide not a bank1 private bankers will take advantage of this circumstance2 as the goldsmiths formerly did in ,london1 or as the bankers do at present in ,dublin2 and therefore it is better1 it may be thought1 that a public company should enjoy the benefit of the paper-credit which always will have place in every opulent kingdom4 ,but to endeavour artificially to increase such a credit can never be the interest of any trading nation2 but must lay them under disadvantages1 by increasing money beyond its natural proportion to labour and commodities1 and thereby heightening their price to the merchant and manufacturer4 ,and in this view1 it must be allowed that no bank could be more advantageous than such a one as locked up all the money it received1#ac and never augmented the circulating coin1 as is usual1 by returning part of its treasure into commerce4 ,a public bank by this expedient might cut off much of the dealings of private bankers and money-jobbers2 and though the state bore the charge of salaries to the directors and tellers of this bank 7for1 according to the preceding supposition1 it would have no profit from its dealings71 the national advantage1 resulting from the low price of labour and the destruction of paper-credit1 would be a sufficient compensation4 ,not to mention that so large a sum1 lying ready at command1 would be a great convenience in times of public danger and distress2 and what part of it was used might be replaced at leisure1 when peace and tranquillity were restored to the nation4 ,but of this subject of paper-credit we shall treat more largely hereafter1 and ,i shall finish this essay on money by proposing and explaining two observations1 which may perhaps serve to employ the thoughts of our speculative politicians1 for to these only ,i all along address myself4 ,it is enough that ,i submit to the ridicule sometimes in this age attached to the character of a philosopher1 without adding to it that which belongs to a projector4 ,it was a shrewd observation of ,anacharsis the ,scythian1 who had never seen money in his own country1 that gold and silver seemed to him of no use to the ,greeks but to assist them in numeration and arithmetic4 ,it is indeed evident that money is nothing but the representation of labour and commodities1 and serves only as a method of rating or estimating them4 ,where coin is in greater plenty1 as a greater quantity of it is required to represent the same quantity of goods1 it can have no effect1 either good or bad1 taking a nation within itself2 no more than it would make any alteration on a merchant's books if1 instead of the ,arabian method of notation1 which requires few characters1 he should make use of the ,roman1 which requires a great many4 ,nay1 the greater quantity of money1 like the ,roman characters1 is rather inconvenient1 and requires greater trouble both to keep and transport it4 ,but notwithstanding this conclusion1 which must be allowed just1 it is certain that since the discovery of mines in ,america industry has increased in all the nations of ,europe1 except in the possessors of those mines2 and this may justly be ascribed1 amongst other reasons1 to the increase of gold and silver4 ,accordingly1 we find that in every kingdom into which money begins to flow in greater abundance than formerly everything takes a new face2 labour and industry gain life1 the merchant becomes more enterprising1 the manufacturer more diligent and skilful1 and even the farmer follows his plough with greater alacrity and attention4 ,this is not easily to be accounted for1 if we consider only the influence which a greater abundance of coin has in the kingdom itself1 by heightening the price of commodities1 and obliging every one to pay a greater number of these little yellow or white pieces for everything he purchases4 ,and as to foreign trade1 it appears that great plenty of money is rather disadvantageous1 by raising the price of every kind of labour4 ,to account1 then1 for this phenomenon1 we must consider that though the high price of commodities be a necessary consequence of the increase of gold and silver1 yet it follows not immediately upon that increase2 but some time is required before the money circulates through the whole state1 and makes its effects be felt on all ranks of people4 ,at first1 no alteration is perceived2 by degrees the price rises1 first of one commodity then of another1 till the whole at last reaches a just proportion with the new quantity of specie which is in the kingdom4 ,in my opinion1 it is only in this interval or intermediate situation1 between the acquisition of money and rise of prices1 that the increasing quantity of gold and silver is favourable to industry4 ,when any quantity of money is imported into a nation1 it is not at first dispersed into many hands1 but is confined to the coffers of a few persons1 who immediately seek to employ it to the best advantage4 ,here are a set of manufacturers or merchants1 we shall suppose1 who have received returns of gold and silver for goods which they sent to ,cadiz4 ,they are thereby enabled to employ more workmen than formerly1 who never dream of demanding higher wages1 but are glad of employment from such good paymasters4 ,if workmen become scarce1 the manufacturer gives higher wages1 but at first requires an increase of labour2 and this is willingly submitted to by the artisan1 who can now eat and drink better1 to compensate his additional toil and fatigue4 ,he carries his money to market1 where he finds everything at the same price as formerly1 but returns with greater quantity and of better kinds1 for the use of his family4 ,the farmer and gardener1 finding that all commodities are taken off1 apply themselves with alacrity to the raising more2 and at the same time can afford to take better and more clothes from their tradesmen1 whose price is the same as formerly1 and their industry only whetted by so much new gain4 ,it is easy to trace the money in its progress through the whole commonwealth2 where we shall find that it must first quicken the diligence of every individual1 before it increase the price of labour4 ,and that the specie may increase to a considerable pitch before it have this latter effect appears1 amongst other instances1 from the frequent operations of the ,french king on the money2 where it was always found that the augmenting the numerary value did not produce a proportional rise of the prices1 at least for some time4 ,in the last year of ,louis ,,xiv4 money was raised three-sevenths1 but prices augmented only one4 ,corn in ,france is now sold at the same price1 or for the same number of livres it was in #afhc2 though silver was then at thirty livres the mark1 and is now at fifty2#ad not to mention the great addition of gold and silver which may have come into that kingdom since the former period4 ,from the whole of this reasoning we may conclude that it is of no manner of consequence1 with regard to the domestic happiness of a state1 whether money be in a greater or less quantity4 ,the good policy of the magistrate consists only in keeping it1 if possible1 still increasing2 because1 by that means1 he keeps alive a spirit of industry in the nation1 and increases the stock of labour1 in which consists all real power and riches4 ,a nation whose money decreases is actually1 at that time1 much weaker and more miserable than another nation which possesses no more money but is on the increasing hand4 ,this will be easily accounted for if we consider that the alterations in the quantity of money1 either on the one side or the other1 are not immediately attended with proportionable alterations in the prices of commodities4 ,there is always an interval before matters be adjusted to their new situation1 and this interval is as pernicious to industry when gold and silver are diminishing as it is advantageous when these metals are increasing4 ,the workman has not the same employment from the manufacturer and merchant1 though he pays the same price for everything in the market2 the farmer cannot dispose of his corn and cattle1 though he must pay the same rent to his landlord4 ,the poverty1 and beggary1 and sloth which must ensue are easily foreseen4 ,the second observation which ,i proposed to make with regard to money may be explained after the following manner4 ,there are some kingdoms1 and many provinces in ,europe 7and all of them were once in the same condition71 where money is so scarce that the landlord can get none at all from his tenants1 but is obliged to take his rent in kind1 and either to consume it himself1 or transport it to places where he may find a market4 ,in those countries the prince can levy few or no taxes but in the same manner2 and as he will receive very small benefit from impositions so paid1 it is evident that such a kingdom has very little force even at home1 and cannot maintain fleets and armies to the same extent as if every part of it abounded in gold and silver4#ae ,there is surely a greater disproportion betwixt the force of ,germany at present and what it was three centuries ago1 than there is in its industry1 people1 and manufactures4 ,the ,austrian dominions in the empire are in general well peopled and well cultivated1 and are of great extent1 but have not a proportionable weight in the balance of ,europe2 proceeding1 as is commonly supposed1 from the scarcity of money4 ,how do all these facts agree with that principle of reason1 that the quantity of gold and silver is in itself altogether indifferent8 ,according to that principle1 wherever a sovereign has numbers of subjects1 and these have plenty of commodities1 he should of course be great and powerful1 and they rich and happy1 independent of the greater or lesser abundance of the precious metals4 ,these admit of divisions and subdivisions to a great extent2 and where they would become so small as to be in danger of being lost1 it is easy to mix them with a baser metal1 as is practised in some countries of ,europe1 and by that means raise them to a bulk more sensible and convenient4 ,they still serve the same purposes of exchange1 whatever their number may be1 or whatever colour they may be supposed to have4 ,to these difficulties1 ,i answer that the effect here supposed to flow from scarcity of money really arises from the manners and customs of the inhabitants1 and that we mistake1 as is too usual1 a collateral effect for a cause4 ,the contradiction is only apparent1 but it requires some thought and reflection to discover the principles by which we can reconcile reason to experience4 ,it seems a maxim almost self-evident that the prices of everything depend on the proportion between commodities and money1 and that any considerable alteration on either of these has the same effect1 either of heightening or lowering the prices4 ,increase the commodities1 they become cheaper2 increase the money1 they rise in their value4 ,as1 on the other hand1 a diminution of the former and that of the latter have contrary tendencies4 ,it is also evident that the prices do not so much depend on the absolute quantity of commodities and that of money which are in a nation1 as in that of the commodities which come or may come to market1 and of the money which circulates4 ,if the coin be locked up in chests1 it is the same thing with regard to prices as if it were annihilated2 if the commodities be hoarded in granaries1 a like effect follows4 ,as the money and commodities1 in these cases1 never meet1 they cannot affect each other4 ,were we1 at any time1 to form conjectures concerning the price of provisions1 the corn which the farmer must reserve for the maintenance of himself and family ought never to enter into the estimation4 ,it is only the overplus1 compared to the demand1 that determines the value4 ,to apply these principles1 we must consider that in the first and more uncultivated ages of any state1 ere fancy has confounded her wants with those of nature1 men1 contented with the productions of their own fields1 or with those rude preparations which they themselves can work upon them1 have little occasion for exchange1 or at least for money1 which1 by agreement1 is the common measure of exchange4 ,the wool of the farmer's own flock1 spun in his own family1 and wrought by a neighbouring weaver1 who receives his payment in corn or wool1 suffices for furniture or clothing4 ,the carpenter1 the smith1 the mason1 the tailor are retained by wages of a like nature2 and the landlord himself1 dwelling in the neighbourhood1 is contented to receive his rent in the commodities raised by the farmer4 ,the greatest part of these he consumes at home1 in rustic hospitality2 the rest1 perhaps1 he disposes of for money to the neighbouring town1 whence he draws the few materials of his expense and luxury4 ,but after men begin to refine on all these enjoyments1 and live not always at home1 nor are contented with what can be raised in their neighbourhood1 there is more exchange and commerce of all kinds1 and more money enters into that exchange4 ,the tradesmen will not be paid in corn1 because they want something more than barley to eat4 ,the farmer goes beyond his own parish for the commodities he purchases1 and cannot always carry his commodities to the merchant who supplies him4 ,the landlord lives in the capital1 or in a foreign country1 and demands his rent in gold and silver1 which can easily be transported to him4 ,great undertakers1 and manufacturers1 and merchants arise in every commodity2 and these can conveniently deal in nothing but in specie4 ,and consequently1 in this situation of society1 the coin enters into many more contracts1 and by that means is much more employed than in the former4 ,the necessary effect is1 that1 provided the money does not increase in the nation1 everything must become much cheaper in times of industry and refinement than in rude1 uncultivated ages4 ,it is the proportion between the circulating money and the commodities in the market which determines the prices4 ,goods that are consumed at home1 or exchanged with other goods in the neighbourhood1 never come to market2 they affect not in the least the current specie2 with regard to it they are as if totally annihilated2 and consequently this method of using them sinks the proportion on the side of the commodities and increases the prices4 ,but after money enters into all contracts and sales1 and is everywhere the measure of exchange1 the same national cash has a much greater task to perform3 all commodities are then in the market2 the sphere of circulation is enlarged2 it is the same case as if that individual sum were to serve a larger kingdom2 and therefore1 the proportion being here lessened on the side of the money1 everything must become cheaper1 and the prices gradually fall4 ,by the most exact computations that have been formed all over ,europe1 after making allowance for the alteration in the numerary value or the denomination1 it is found that the prices of all things have only risen three1 or at most1 four times1 since the discovery of the ,west ,indies4 ,but will any one assert that there is not much more than four times the coin in ,europe that was in the fifteenth century and the centuries preceding it8 ,the ,spaniards and ,portuguese from their mines1 the ,english1 ,french1 and ,dutch by their ,african trade1 and by their interlopers in the ,west ,indies1 bring home six millions a year1 of which not above a third part goes to the ,east ,indies4 ,this sum alone in ten years would probably double the ancient stock of money in ,europe4 ,and no other satisfactory reason can be given why all prices have not risen to a much more exorbitant height1 except that derived from a change of customs and manners4 ,besides that more commodities are produced by additional industry1 the same commodities come more to market after men depart from their ancient simplicity of manners2 and though this increase has not been equal to that of money1 it has1 however1 been considerable1 and has preserved the proportion between coin and commodities nearer the ancient standard4 ,were the question proposed1 ,which of these methods of living in the people1 the simple or refined1 is most advantageous to the state or public8 ,i should1 without much scruple1 prefer the latter1 in a view to politics at least2 and should produce this as an additional reason for the encouragement of trade and manufactures4 ,when men live in the ancient simple manner1 and supply all their necessaries from domestic industry or from the neighbourhood1 the sovereign can levy no taxes in money from a considerable part of his subjects2 and if he will impose on them any burdens1 he must take his payment in commodities1 with which alone they abound--a method attended with such great and obvious inconveniences1 that they need not here be insisted on4 ,all the money he can pretend to raise must be from his principal cities1 where alone it circulates2 and these1 it is evident1 cannot afford him so much as the whole state could1 did gold and silver circulate through the whole4 ,but besides this obvious diminution of the revenue1 there is also another cause of the poverty of the public in such a situation4 ,not only the sovereign receives less money1 but the same money goes not so far as in times of industry and general commerce4 ,everything is dearer where the gold and silver are supposed equal1 and that because fewer commodities come to market1 and the whole coin bears a higher proportion to what is to be purchased by it1 whence alone the prices of everything are fixed and determined4 ,here then we may learn the fallacy of the remark1 often to be met with in historians1 and even in common conversation1 that any particular state is weak1 though fertile1 populous1 and well cultivated1 merely because it wants money4 ,it appears that the want of money can never injure any state within itself3 for men and commodities are the real strength of any community4 ,it is the simple manner of living which here hurts the public1 by confining the gold and silver to few hands and preventing its universal diffusion and circulation4 ,on the contrary1 industry and refinements of all kinds incorporate it with the whole state1 however small its quantity may be2 they digest it into every vein1 so to speak1 and make it enter into every transaction and contract4 ,no hand is entirely empty of it4 ,and as the prices of everything fall by that means1 the sovereign has a double advantage3 he may draw money by his taxes from every part of the state1 and what he receives goes farther in every purchase and payment4 ,we may infer1 from a comparison of prices1 that money is not more plentiful in ,china than it was in ,europe three centuries ago2 but what immense power is that empire possessed of1 if we may judge by the civil and military list maintained by it6 ,polybius tells us that provisions were so cheap in ,italy during his time that in some places the stated club#af at the inns was a semis a head1 little more than a farthing6 ,yet the ,roman power had even then subdued the whole known world4 ,about a century before that period the ,carthaginian ambassador said1 by way of raillery1 that no people lived more sociably amongst themselves than the ,romans1 for that in every entertainment which1 as foreign ministers1 they received they still observed the same plate at every table4 ,the absolute quantity of the precious metals is a matter of great indifference4 ,there are only two circumstances of any importance--viz41 their gradual increase and their thorough concoction and circulation through the state2 and the influence of both these circumstances has been here explained4 ,in the following essay we shall see an instance of a like fallacy as that above mentioned1 where a collateral effect is taken for a cause1 and where a consequence is ascribed to the plenty of money2 though it be really owing to a change in the manners and customs of the people4 ,,notes1 ,,of ,,money4 #ab ,a private soldier in the ,roman infantry had a denarius a day1 somewhat less than eightpence4 ,the ,roman emperors had commonly #be legions in pay1 which1 allowing #ejjj men to a legion1 makes #abe1jjj4 7,tacitus1 ,ann4 lib4 #d47 ,it is true there were also auxiliaries to the legions1 but their numbers are uncertain as well as their pay4 ,to consider only the legionaries1 the pay of the private men could not exceed #a1fjj1jjj4 ,now1 the ,parliament in the last war commonly allowed for the fleet #b1ejj1jjj4 ,we have therefore #ijj1jjj over for the officers and other expenses of the ,roman legions4 ,there seem to have been but few officers in the ,roman armies in comparison of what are employed in all our modern troops1 except some ,swiss corps4 ,and these officers had very small pay3 a centurion1 for instance1 only double a common soldier4 ,and as the soldiers from their pay 7,tacitus1 ,ann4 lib4 #a7 bought their own clothes1 arms1 tents1 and baggage1 this must also diminish considerably the other charges of the army4 ,so little expensive was that mighty ,government1 and so easy was its yoke over the world4 ,and1 indeed1 this is the more natural conclusion from the foregoing calculations2 for money1 after the conquest of ,egypt1 seems to have been nearly in as great plenty at ,rome as it is at present in the richest of the ,european kingdoms4 #ac ,this is the case with the bank of ,amsterdam4 #ad ,these facts ,i give upon the authority of ,monsieur du ,tot in his ,reflexions politiques1 an author of reputation2 though ,i must confess that the facts which he advances on other occasions are often so suspicious as to make his authority less in this matter4 ,however1 the general observation that the augmenting the money in ,france does not at first proportionably augment the prices is certainly just4 ,by the by1 this seems to be one of the best reasons which can be given for a gradual and universal augmentation of the money1 though it has been entirely overlooked in all those volumes which have been written on that question by ,melon1 ,du ,tot1 and ,paris de ,verney4 ,were all our money1 for instance1 recoined1 and a penny's worth of silver taken from every shilling1 the new shilling would probably purchase everything that could have been bought by the old2 the prices of everything would thereby be insensibly diminished2 foreign trade enlivened2 and domestic industry1 by the circulation of a greater number of pounds and shillings1 would receive some increase and encouragement4 ,in executing such a project1 it would be better to make the new shilling pass for twenty-four half-pence1 in order to preserve the illusion1 and make it be taken for the same4 ,and as a recoinage of our silver begins to be requisite1 by the continual wearing of our shillings and six-pences1 it may be doubtful whether we ought to imitate the example in ,king ,william's reign1 when the clipped money was raised to the old standard4 #ae ,the ,italians gave to the ,emperor ,maximilian the nickname of ,pochi-,danari4 ,none of the enterprises of that prince ever succeeded1 for want of money4 ,,of ,,interest4 ,nothing is esteemed a more certain sign of the flourishing condition of any nation than the lowness of interest2 and with reason1 though ,i believe the cause is somewhat different from what is commonly apprehended4 ,the lowness of interest is generally ascribed to the plenty of money2 but money1 however plentiful1 has no other effect1 if fixed1 than to raise the price of labour4 ,silver is more common than gold1 and therefore you receive a great quantity of it for the same commodities4 ,but do you pay less interest for it8 ,interest in ,batavia and ,jamaica is at #aj per cent41 in ,portugal at #f2 though these places1 as we may learn from the prices of everything1 abound much more in gold and silver than either ,london or ,amsterdam4 ,were all the gold in ,england annihilated at once1 and one-and-twenty shillings substituted in the place of every guinea1 would money be more plentiful and interest lower8 ,no surely2 we should only use silver instead of gold4 ,were gold rendered as common as silver1 and silver as common as copper1 would money be more plentiful and interest lower8 ,we may assuredly give the same answer4 ,our shillings would then be yellow1 and our halfpence white2 and we should have no guineas4 ,no other difference would ever be observed2 no alteration on commerce1 manufactures1 navigation1 or interest2 unless we imagine that the colour of the metal is of any consequence4 ,now1 what is so visible in these greater variations of scarcity or abundance of the precious metals must hold in all inferior changes4 ,if the multiplying gold and silver fifteen times makes no difference1 much less can the doubling or tripling them4 ,all augmentation has no other effect than to heighten the price of labour and commodities2 and even this variation is little more than that of a name4 ,in the progress towards these changes the augmentation may have some influence by exciting industry2 but after the prices are settled1 suitable to the new abundance of gold and silver1 it has no manner of influence4 ,an effect always holds proportion with its cause4 ,prices have risen about four times since the discovery of the ,indies1 and it is probable that gold and silver have multiplied much more2 but interest has not fallen much above a half4 ,the rate of interest1 therefore1 is not derived from the quantity of the precious metals4 ,money having merely a fictitious value1 arising from the agreement and convention of men1 the greater or less plenty of it is of no consequence1 if we consider a nation within itself2 and the quantity of specie1 when once fixed1 though never so large1 has no other effect than to oblige every one to tell out a greater number of those shining bits of metal for clothes1 furniture1 or equipage1 without increasing any one convenience of life4 ,if a man borrows money to build a house1 he then carries home a greater load2 because the stone1 timber1 lead1 glass1 etc41 with the labour of the masons and carpenters1 are represented by a greater quantity of gold and silver4 ,but as these metals are considered merely as representations1 there can no alteration arise from their bulk or quantity1 their weight or colour1 either upon their real value or their interest4 ,the same interest1 in all cases1 bears the same proportion to the sum4 ,and if you lent me so much labour and so many commodities1 by receiving #e per cent4 you receive always proportional labour and commodities1 however represented1 whether by yellow or white coin1 whether by a pound or an ounce4 ,it is in vain1 therefore1 to look for the cause of the fall or rise of interest in the greater or less quantity of gold and silver which is fixed in any nation4 ,high interest arises from three circumstances3 ,a great demand for borrowing2 little riches to supply that demand2 and great profits arising from commerce4 ,and these circumstances are a clear proof of the small advance of commerce and industry1 not of the scarcity of gold and silver4 ,low interest1 on the other hand1 proceeds from the three opposite circumstances3 ,a small demand for borrowing2 great riches to supply that demand2 and small profits arising from commerce4 ,and these circumstances are all connected together1 and proceed from the increase of industry and commerce1 not of gold and silver4 ,we shall endeavour to prove these points as fully and distinctly as possible1 and shall begin with the causes and the effects of a great or small demand for borrowing4 ,when the people have emerged ever so little from a savage state1 and their numbers have increased beyond the original multitude1 there must immediately arise an inequality of property2 and while some possess large tracts of land1 others are confined within narrow limits1 and some are entirely without any landed property4 ,those who possess more land than they can labour employ those who possess none1 and agree to receive a determinate part of the product4 ,thus the landed interest is immediately established2 nor is there any settled government1 however rude1 in which affairs are not on this footing4 ,of these proprietors of land1 some must presently discover themselves to be of different tempers from others2 and while one would willingly store up the product of his land for futurity1 another desires to consume at present what should suffice for many years4 ,but as the spending a settled revenue is a way of life entirely without occupation1 men have so much need of somewhat to fix and engage them1 that pleasures1 such as they are1 will be the pursuit of the greatest part of the landholders1 and the prodigals amongst them will always be more numerous than the misers4 ,in a state1 therefore1 where there is nothing but a landed interest1 as there is little frugality1 the borrowers must be very numerous1 and the rate of interest must hold proportion to it4 ,the difference depends not on the quantity of money1 but on the habits and manners which prevail4 ,by this alone the demand for borrowing is increased or diminished4 ,were money so plentiful as to make an egg be sold for sixpence1 so long as there are only landed gentry and peasants in the state1 the borrowers must be numerous and interest high4 ,the rent for the same farm would be heavier and more bulky1 but the same idleness of the landlord1 with the higher prices of commodities1 would dissipate it in the same time1 and produce the same necessity and demand for borrowing4 ,nor is the case different with regard to the second circumstance which we proposed to consider--viz41 the great or little riches to supply this demand4 ,this effect also depends on the habits and ways of living of the people1 not on the quantity of gold and silver4 ,in order to have in any state a great number of lenders1 it is not sufficient nor requisite that there be great abundance of the precious metals4 ,it is only requisite that the property or command of that quantity which is in the state1 whether great or small1 should be collected in particular hands1 so as to form considerable sums1 or compose a great moneyed interest4 ,this begets a number of lenders and sinks the rate of usury2 and this1 ,i shall venture to affirm1 depends not on the quantity of specie1 but on particular manners and customs1 which make the specie gather into separate sums or masses of considerable value4 ,for suppose that1 by miracle1 every man in ,britain should have five pounds slipped into his pocket in one night3 this would much more than double the whole money that is at present in the kingdom2 and yet there would not next day1 nor for some time1 be any more lenders1 nor any variation on the interest4 ,and were there nothing but landlords and peasants in the state1 this money1 however abundant1 could never gather into sums2 and would only serve to increase the prices of everything1 without any further consequence4 ,the prodigal landlord dissipates it as fast as he receives it2 and the beggarly peasant has no means1 nor view1 nor ambition of obtaining above a bare livelihood4 ,the overplus of borrowers above that of lenders continuing still the same1 there will follow no reduction of interest4 ,that depends upon another principle1 and must proceed from an increase of industry and frugality1 of arts and commerce4 ,everything useful to the life of man arises from the ground2 but few things arise in that condition which is requisite to render them useful4 ,there must1 therefore1 besides the peasants and the proprietors of land1 be another rank of men1 who1 receiving from the former the rude materials1 work them into their proper form1 and retain part for their own use and subsistence4 ,in the infancy of society1 these contracts betwixt the artisans and the peasants1 and betwixt one species of artisans and another1 are commonly entered into immediately by the persons themselves1 who1 being neighbours1 are easily acquainted with each other's necessities1 and can lend their mutual assistance to supply them4 ,but when men's industry increases1 and their views enlarge1 it is found that the most remote parts of the state can assist each other as well as the more contiguous1 and that this intercourse of good offices may be carried on to the greatest extent and intricacy4 ,hence the origin of merchants1 the most useful race of men in the whole society1 who serve as agents between those parts of the state that are wholly unacquainted and are ignorant of each other's necessities4 ,here are in a city fifty workmen in silk and linen1 and a thousand customers2 and these two ranks of men1 so necessary to each other1 can never rightly meet till one man erects a shop1 to which all the workmen and all the customers repair4 ,in this province grass rises in abundance3 the inhabitants abound in cheese1 and butter1 and cattle2 but want bread and corn1 which1 in a neighbouring province1 are in too great abundance for the use of the inhabitants4 ,one man discovers this4 ,he brings corn from the one province1 and returns with cattle2 and supplying the wants of both1 he is1 so far1 a common benefactor4 ,as the people increase in numbers and industry1 the difficulty of their intercourse increases3 the business of the agency or merchandise becomes more intricate1 and divides1 subdivides1 compounds1 and mixes to a greater variety4 ,in all these transactions it is necessary1 and reasonable1 that a considerable part of the commodities and labour should belong to the merchant1 to whom1 in a great measure1 they are owing4 ,and these commodities he will sometimes preserve in kind1 or more commonly convert into money1 which is their common representation4 ,if gold and silver have increased in the state together with the industry1 it will require a great quantity of these metals to represent a great quantity of commodities and labour2 if industry alone has increased1 the prices of everything must sink1 and a very small quantity of specie will serve as a representation4 ,there is no craving or demand of the human mind more constant and insatiable than that for exercise and employment1 and this desire seems the foundation of most of our passions and pursuits4 ,deprive a man of all business and serious occupation1 he runs restless from one amusement to another2 and the weight and oppression which he feels from idleness is so great that he forgets the ruin which must follow from his immoderate expenses4 ,give him a more harmless way of employing his mind or body1 he is satisfied1 and feels no longer that insatiable thirst after pleasure4 ,but if the employment you give him be profitable1 especially if the profit be attached to every particular exertion of industry1 he has gain so often in his eye that he acquires1 by degrees1 a passion for it1 and knows no such pleasure as that of seeing the daily increase of his fortune4 ,and this is the reason why trade increases frugality1 and why1 among merchants1 there is the same overplus of misers above prodigals as1 among the possessors of land1 there is the contrary4 ,commerce increases industry1 by conveying it readily from one member of the state to another1 and allowing none of it to perish or become useless4 ,it increases frugality1 by giving occupation to men1 and employing them in the arts of gain1 which soon engage their affection and remove all relish for pleasure and expense4 ,it is an infallible consequence of all industrious professions to beget frugality1 and make the love of gain prevail over the love of pleasure4 ,among lawyers and physicians who have any practice there are many more who live within their income than who exceed it1 or even live up to it4 ,but lawyers and physicians beget no industry1 and it is even at the expense of others they acquire their riches2 so that they are sure to diminish the possessions of some of their fellow-citizens as fast as they increase their own4 ,merchants1 on the contrary1 beget industry1 by serving as canals to convey it through every corner of the state2 and at the same time1 by their frugality1 they acquire great power over that industry1 and collect a large property in the labour and commodities which they are the chief instruments in producing4 ,there is no other profession1 therefore1 except merchandise1 which can make the moneyed interest considerable1 or1 in other words1 can increase industry1 and1 by also increasing frugality1 give a great command of that industry to particular members of the society4 ,without commerce1 the state must consist chiefly of landed gentry1 whose prodigality and expense make a continual demand for borrowing1 and of peasants1 who have no sums to supply that demand4 ,the money never gathers into large stocks or sums which can be lent at interest4 ,it is dispersed into numberless hands1 who either squander it in idle show and magnificence1 or employ it in the purchase of the common necessaries of life4 ,commerce alone assembles it into considerable sums2 and this effect it has merely from the industry which it begets and the frugality which it inspires1 independent of that particular quantity of precious metal which may circulate in the state4 ,thus an increase of commerce1 by a necessary consequence1 raises a great number of lenders1 and by that means produces a lowness of interest4 ,we must now consider how far this increase of commerce diminishes the profits arising from that profession1 and gives rise to the third circumstance requisite to produce a lowness of interest4 ,it may be proper to observe on this head that low interest and low profits of merchandise are two events that mutually forward each other1 and are both originally derived from that extensive commerce which produces opulent merchants and renders the moneyed interest considerable4 ,where merchants possess great stocks1 whether represented by few or many pieces of metal1 it must frequently happen that when they either become tired of business or have heirs unwilling or unfit to engage in commerce1 a great deal of these riches will seek an annual and secure revenue4 ,the plenty diminishes the price1 and makes the lenders accept of a low interest4 ,this consideration obliges many to keep their stocks in trade1 and rather be content with low profits than dispose of their money at an under value4 ,on the other hand1 when commerce has become very extensive1 and employs very large stocks1 there must arise rivalships among the merchants1 which diminish the profits of trade1 at the same time that they increase the trade itself4 ,the low profits of merchandise induce the merchants to accept more willingly of a low interest1 when they leave off business and begin to indulge themselves in ease and indolence4 ,it is needless1 therefore1 to inquire which of these circumstances--viz41 low interest or low profits1 is the cause1 and which the effect4 ,they both arise from an extensive commerce1 and mutually forward each other4 ,no man will accept of low profits where he can have high interest1 and no man will accept of low interest where he can have high profits4 ,an extensive commerce1 by producing large stocks1 diminishes both interest and profits2 and is always assisted in its diminution of the one by the proportional sinking of the other4 ,i may add1 that as low profits arise from the increase of commerce and industry1 they serve in their turn to the further increase of commerce1 by rendering the commodities cheaper1 encouraging the consumption1 and heightening the industry4 ,and thus1 if we consider the whole connection of causes and effects1 interest is the true barometer of the state1 and its lowness is a sign almost infallible of the flourishing of a people4 ,it proves the increase of industry1 and its prompt circulation through the whole state1 little inferior to a demonstration4 ,and though1 perhaps1 it may not be impossible but a sudden and a great check to commerce may have a momentary effect of the same kind1 by throwing so many stocks out of trade1 it must be attended with such misery and want of employment in the poor that1 besides its short duration1 it will not be possible to mistake the one case for the other4 ,those who have asserted that the plenty of money was the cause of low interest seem to have taken a collateral effect for a cause1 since the same industry which sinks the interest does commonly acquire great abundance of the precious metals4 ,a variety of fine manufactures1 with vigilant1 enterprising merchants1 will soon draw money to a state if it be anywhere to be found in the world4 ,the same cause1 by multiplying the conveniences of life and increasing industry1 collects great riches into the hands of persons who are not proprietors of land1 and produces by that means a lowness of interest4 ,but though both these effects--plenty of money and low interest--naturally arise from commerce and industry1 they are altogether independent of each other4 ,for suppose a nation removed into the ,pacific ,ocean1 without any foreign commerce1 or any knowledge of navigation3 suppose that this nation possesses always the same stock of coin1 but is continually increasing in its numbers and industry3 it is evident that the price of every commodity must gradually diminish in that kingdom1 since it is the proportion between money and any species of goods which fixes their mutual value2 and1 under the present supposition1 the conveniences of life become every day more abundant1 without any alteration on the current specie4 ,a less quantity of money1 therefore1 amongst this people will make a rich man1 during the times of industry1 than would serve to that purpose in ignorant and slothful ages4 ,less money will build a house1 portion a daughter1 buy an estate1 support a manufactory1 or maintain a family and equipage4 ,these are the uses for which men borrow money1 and therefore the greater or less quantity of it in a state has no influence on the interest4 ,but it is evident that the greater or less stock of labour and commodities must have a great influence1 since we really and in effect borrow these when we take money upon interest4 ,it is true1 when commerce is extended all over the globe the most industrious nations always abound most with the precious metals2 so that low interest and plenty of money are in fact almost inseparable4 ,but still it is of consequence to know the principle whence any phenomenon arises1 and to distinguish between a cause and a concomitant effect4 ,besides that the speculation is curious1 it may frequently be of use in the conduct of public affairs4 ,at least1 it must be owned that nothing can be of more use than to improve1 by practice1 the method of reasoning on these subjects1 which of all others are the most important2 though they are commonly treated in the loosest and most careless manner4 ,another reason of this popular mistake with regard to the cause of low interest seems to be the instance of some nations1 where1 after a sudden acquisition of money or the precious metals by means of foreign conquest1 the interest has fallen not only among them but in all the neighbouring states as soon as that money was dispersed and had insinuated itself into every corner4 ,thus1 interest in ,spain fell nearly a half immediately after the discovery of the ,west ,indies1 as we are informed by ,garcilasso de la ,vega2 and it has been ever since sinking in every kingdom of ,europe4 ,interest in ,rome1 after the conquest of ,egypt1 fell from #f to #d per cent41 as we learn from ,dion4 ,the causes of the sinking of interest upon such an event seem different in the conquering country and in the neighbouring states1 but in neither of them can we justly ascribe that effect merely to the increase of gold and silver4 ,in the conquering country it is natural to imagine that this new acquisition of money will fall into a few hands1 and be gathered into large sums which seek a secure revenue1 either by the purchase of land or by interest2 and consequently the same effect follows1 for a little time1 as if there had been a great accession of industry and commerce4 ,the increase of lenders above the borrowers sinks the interest1 and so much the faster if those who have acquired those large sums find no industry or commerce in the state1 and no method of employing their money but by lending it at interest4 ,but after this new mass of gold and silver has been digested1 and has circulated through the whole state1 affairs will soon return to their former situation1 while the landlords and new money-holders1 living idly1 squander above their income1 and the former daily contract debt1 and the latter encroach on their stock till its final extinction4 ,the whole money may still be in the state1 and make itself be felt by the increase of prices1 but not being now collected into any large masses or stocks1 the disproportion between the borrowers and lenders is the same as formerly1 and consequently the high interest returns4 ,accordingly1 we find in ,rome that so early as ,tiberius's time interest had again mounted to #f per cent41 though no accident had happened to drain the empire of money4 ,in ,trajan's time money lent on mortgages in ,italy bore #f per cent42 on common securities in ,bithynia1 #ab4 ,and if interest in ,spain has not risen to its old pitch1 this can be ascribed to nothing but the continuance of the same cause that sunk it--viz41 the large fortunes continually made in the ,indies1 which come over to ,spain from time to time and supply the demand of the borrowers4 ,by this accidental and extraneous cause more money is to be lent in ,spain--that is1 more money is collected into large sums than would otherwise be found in a state where there are so little commerce and industry4 ,as to the reduction of interest which has followed in ,england1 ,france1 and other kingdoms of ,europe that have no mines1 it has been gradual1 and has not proceeded from the increase of money1 considered merely in itself1 but from the increase of industry1 which is the natural effect of the former increase1 in that interval1 before it raises the price of labour and provisions4 ,for to return to the foregoing supposition1 if the industry of ,england had risen as much from other causes 7and that rise might easily have happened though the stock of money had remained the same71 must not all the same consequences have followed which we observe at present8 ,the same people would1 in that case1 be found in the kingdom1 the same commodities1 the same industry1 manufactures1 and commerce1 and consequently the same merchants with the same stocks--that is1 with the same command over labour and commodities1 only represented by a smaller number of white or yellow pieces1 which1 being a circumstance of no moment1 would only affect the waggoner1 porter1 and trunk-maker4 ,luxury1 therefore1 manufactures1 arts1 industry1 frugality flourishing equally as at present1 it is evident that interest must also have been as low1 since that is the necessary result of all these circumstances1 so far as they determine the profits of commerce and the proportion between the borrowers and lenders in any state4 ,,note1 ,,of ,,interest4 #af ,price for a meal4 ,,of ,,the ,,balance ,,of ,,trade4 ,it is very usual in nations ignorant of the nature of commerce to prohibit the exportation of commodities1 and to preserve among themselves whatever they think valuable and useful4 ,they consider not that in this prohibition they act directly contrary to their intention1 and that the more is exported of any commodity the more will be raised at home1 of which they themselves will always have the first offer4 ,it is well known to the learned that the ancient laws of ,athens rendered the exportation of figs criminal1 that being supposed a species of fruit so excellent in ,attica that the ,athenians esteemed it too delicious for the palate of any foreigner2 and in this ridiculous prohibition they were so much in earnest that informers were thence called 8sycophants0 among them1 from two ,greek words which signify figs and discoverer4 ,there are proofs in many old ,acts of ,parliament of the same ignorance in the nature of commerce1 particularly in the reign of ,edward ,,iii42 and to this day in ,france the exportation of corn is almost always prohibited--in order1 as they say1 to prevent famines1 though it is evident that nothing contributes more to the frequent famines which so much distress that fertile country4 ,the same jealous fear with regard to money has also prevailed among several nations1 and it required both reason and experience to convince any people that these prohibitions serve to no other purpose than to raise the exchange against them and produce a still greater exportation4 ,these errors1 one may say1 are gross and palpable2 but there still prevails1 even in nations well acquainted with commerce1 a strong jealousy with regard to the balance of trade1 and a fear that all their gold and silver may be leaving them4 ,this seems to me1 almost in every case1 a very groundless apprehension1 and ,i should as soon dread that all our springs and rivers should be exhausted as that money should abandon a kingdom where there are people and industry4 ,let us carefully preserve these latter advantages1 and we need never be apprehensive of losing the former4 ,it is easy to observe that all calculations concerning the balance of trade are founded on very uncertain facts and suppositions4 ,the custom-house books are allowed to be an insufficient ground of reasoning2 nor is the rate of exchange much better1 unless we consider it with all nations1 and know also the proportion of the several sums remitted1 which one may safely pronounce impossible4 ,every man who has ever reasoned on this subject has always proved his theory1 whatever it was1 by facts and calculations1 and by an enumeration of all the commodities sent to all foreign kingdoms4 ,the writings of ,mr4 ,gee struck the nation with a universal panic when they saw it plainly demonstrated by a detail of particulars that the balance was against them for so considerable a sum as must leave them without a single shilling in five or six years4 ,but luckily twenty years have since elapsed1 with an expensive foreign war1 and yet it is commonly supposed that money is still more plentiful among us than in any former period4 ,nothing can be more entertaining on this head than ,dr4 ,swift1 an author so quick in discerning the mistakes and absurdities of others4 ,he says1 in his ,short ,view of the ,state of ,ireland1 that the whole cash of that kingdom amounted but to #ejj1jjj2 that out of this they remitted every year a neat million to ,england1 and had scarce any other source from which they could compensate themselves1 and little other foreign trade but the importation of ,french wines1 for which they paid ready money4 ,the consequence of this situation1 which must be owned to be disadvantageous1 was that in a course of three years the current money of ,ireland from #ejj1jjj was reduced to less than two2 and at present1 ,i suppose1 in a course of thirty years1 it is absolutely nothing4 ,yet ,i know not how that opinion of the advance of riches in ,ireland1 which gave the ,doctor so much indignation1 seems still to continue and gain ground with everybody4 ,in short1 this apprehension of the wrong balance of trade appears of such a nature that it discovers itself wherever one is out of humour with the ministry1 or is in low spirits2 and as it can never be refuted by a particular detail of all the exports which counterbalance the imports1 it may here be proper to form a general argument which may prove the impossibility of that event as long as we preserve our people and our industry4 ,suppose four-fifths of all the money in ,britain to be annihilated in one night1 and the nation reduced to the same condition1 with regard to specie1 as in the reigns of the ,harrys and ,edwards1 what would be the consequence8 ,must not the price of all labour and commodities sink in proportion1 and everything be sold as cheap as they were in those ages8 ,what nation could then dispute with us in any foreign market1 or pretend to navigate or to sell manufactures at the same price which to us would afford sufficient profit8 ,in how little time1 therefore1 must this bring back the money which we had lost1 and raise us to the level of all the neighbouring nations8 where1 after we have arrived1 we immediately lose the advantage of the cheapness of labour and commodities1 and the further flowing in of money is stopped by our fulness and repletion4 ,again1 suppose that all the money of ,britain were multiplied fivefold in a night1 must not the contrary effect follow8 ,must not labour and commodities rise to such an exorbitant height that no neighbouring nations could afford to buy from us1 while their commodities1 on the other hand1 became so cheap in comparison that1 in spite of all the laws which could be formed1 they would be run in upon us1 and our money flow out till we come to a level with foreigners1 and lose that great superiority of riches which had laid us under such disadvantages8 ,now1 it is evident that the same causes which would correct these exorbitant inequalities1 were they to happen miraculously1 must prevent their happening in the common course of nature1 and must for ever1 in all the neighbouring nations1 preserve money nearly proportionable to the art and industry of each nation4 ,all water1 wherever it communicates1 remains always at a level4 ,ask naturalists the reason3 they tell you that were it to be raised in any one place1 the superior gravity of that part not being balanced1 must depress it till it meets a counterpoise2 and that the same cause which redresses the inequality when it happens must for ever prevent it without some violent external operation4#ag ,can one imagine that it had ever been possible1 by any laws1 or even by any art or industry1 to have kept all the money in ,spain which the galleons have brought from the ,indies8 or that all commodities could be sold in ,france for a tenth of the price which they would yield on the other side of the ,pyrenees1 without finding their way thither1 and draining from that immense treasure8 ,what other reason1 indeed1 is there why all nations at present gain in their trade with ,spain and ,portugal1 but because it is impossible to heap up money1 more than any fluid1 beyond its proper level8 ,the sovereigns of these countries have shown that they wanted not inclination to keep their gold and silver to themselves had it been in any degree practicable4 ,but as any body of water may be raised above the level of the surrounding element1 if the former has no communication with the latter1 so in money1 if the communication be cut off by any material or physical impediment 7for all laws alone are ineffectual71 there may1 in such a case1 be a very great inequality of money4 ,thus the immense distance of ,china1 together with the monopolies of our ,india companies1 obstructing the communication1 preserve in ,europe the gold and silver1 especially the latter1 in much greater plenty than they are found in that kingdom4 ,but1 notwithstanding this great obstruction1 the force of the causes above-mentioned is still evident4 ,the skill and ingenuity of ,europe in general surpasses perhaps that of ,china with regard to manual arts and manufactures1 yet are we never able to trade thither without great disadvantage2 and were it not for the continual recruits which we receive from ,america1 money would very soon sink in ,europe and rise in ,china1 till it came nearly to a level in both places4 ,nor can any reasonable man doubt but that industrious nation1 were they as near us as ,poland or ,barbary1 would drain us of the overplus of our specie1 and draw to themselves a larger share of the ,west ,indian treasures4 ,we need have no recourse to a physical attraction to explain the necessity of this operation2 there is a moral attraction arising from the interests and passions of men which is full as potent and infallible4 ,how is the balance kept in the provinces of every kingdom among themselves but by the force of this principle1 which makes it impossible for money to lose its level1 and either to rise or sink beyond the proportion of the labour and commodities which is in each province8 ,did not long experience make people easy on this head1 what a fund of gloomy reflections might calculations afford a melancholy ,yorkshireman while he computed and magnified the sums drawn to ,london by taxes1 absentees1 commodities1 and found on comparison the opposite articles so much inferior8 ,and no doubt1 had the ,heptarchy subsisted in ,england1 the legislature of each state had been continually alarmed by the fear of a wrong balance2 and it is probable that the mutual hatred of these states would have been extremely violent on account of their close neighbourhood2 they would have loaded and oppressed all commerce by a jealous and superfluous caution4 ,since the ,union has removed the barriers between ,scotland and ,england1 which of these nations gains from the other by this free commerce8 ,or if the former kingdom has received any increase of riches1 can it be reasonably accounted for by anything but the increase of its art and industry8 ,it was a common apprehension in ,england before the ,union1 as we learn from ,l',abbe du ,bos1 that ,scotland would soon drain them of their treasure were an open trade allowed2 and on the other side of the ,tweed a contrary apprehension prevailed--with what justice in both time has shown4 ,what happens in small portions of mankind must take place in greater4 ,the provinces of the ,roman empire no doubt kept their balance with each other1 and with ,italy1 independent of the legislature1 as much as the several counties of ,britain or the several parishes of each county4 ,and any man who travels over ,europe at this day may see by the prices of commodities that money1 in spite of the absurd jealousy of princes and states1 has brought itself nearly to a level1 and that the difference between one kingdom and another is not greater in this respect than it is often between different provinces of the same kingdom4 ,men naturally flock to capital cities1 seaports1 and navigable rivers4 ,there we find more men1 more industry1 more commodities1 and consequently more money2 but still the latter difference holds proportion with the former1 and the level is preserved4#ah ,our jealousy and our hatred of ,france are without bounds1 and the former sentiment at least must be acknowledged very reasonable and well-grounded4 ,these passions have occasioned innumerable barriers and obstructions upon commerce1 where we are accused of being commonly the aggressors4 ,but what have we gained by the bargain8 ,we lost the ,french market for our woollen manufactures1 and transferred the commerce of wine to ,spain and ,portugal1 where we buy much worse liquor at a higher price4 ,there are few ,englishmen who would not think their country absolutely ruined were ,french wines sold in ,england so cheap and in such abundance as to supplant1 in some measure1 all ale and home-brewed liquors2 but would we lay aside prejudice1 it would not be difficult to prove that nothing could be more innocent1 perhaps advantageous4 ,each new acre of vineyard planted in ,france1 in order to supply ,england with wine1 would make it requisite for the ,french to take the produce of an ,english acre1 sown in wheat or barley1 in order to subsist themselves2 and it is evident that we have thereby got command of the better commodity4 ,there are many edicts of the ,french ,king prohibiting the planting of new vineyards1 and ordering all those already planted to be grubbed up1 so sensible are they in that country of the superior value of corn above every other product4 ,mareschal ,vauban complains often1 and with reason1 of the absurd duties which load the entry of those wines of ,languedoc1 ,guienne1 and other southern provinces that are imported into ,brittany and ,normandy4 ,he entertained no doubt but these latter provinces could preserve their balance notwithstanding the open commerce which he recommends4 ,and it is evident that a few leagues more navigation to ,england would make no difference2 or if it did1 that it must operate alike on the commodities of both kingdoms4 ,there is indeed one expedient by which it is possible to sink1 and another by which we may raise1 money beyond its natural level in any kingdom2 but these cases1 when examined1 will be found to resolve into our general theory1 and to bring additional authority to it4 ,i scarce know any method of sinking money below its level but those institutions of banks1 funds1 and paper-credit which are so much practised in this kingdom4 ,these render paper equivalent to money1 circulate it through the whole state1 make it supply the place of gold and silver1 raise proportionally the price of labour and commodities1 and by that means either banish a great part of those precious metals1 or prevent their further increase4 ,what can be more short-sighted than our reasonings on this head8 ,we fancy1 because an individual would be much richer were his stock of money doubled1 that the same good effect would follow were the money of every one increased1 not considering that this would raise as much the price of every commodity1 and reduce every man in time to the same condition as before4 ,it is only in our public negotiations and transactions with foreigners that a greater stock of money is advantageous2 and as our paper is there absolutely insignificant1 we feel1 by its means1 all the ill effects arising from a great abundance of money without reaping any of the advantages4#ai ,suppose that there are twelve millions of paper which circulate in the kingdom as money 7for we are not to imagine that all our enormous funds are employed in that shape71 and suppose the real cash of the kingdom to be eighteen millions3 here is a state which is found by experience able to hold a stock of thirty millions4 ,i say1 if it be able to hold it1 it must of necessity have acquired it in gold and silver had we not obstructed the entrance of these metals by this new invention of paper4 ,whence would it have acquired that sum8 ,from all the kingdoms of the world4 ,but why8 ,because1 if you remove these twelve millions1 money in this state is below its level compared with our neighbours2 and we must immediately draw from all of them till we be full and saturate1 so to speak1 and can hold no more4 ,by our present politics we are as careful to stuff the nation with this fine commodity of bank-bills and chequer notes as if we were afraid of being overburdened with the precious metals4 ,it is not to be doubted but the great plenty of bullion in ,france is1 in a great measure1 owing to the want of paper-credit4 ,the ,french have no banks2 merchants' bills do not there circulate as with us2 usury or lending on interest is not directly permitted1 so that many have large sums in their coffers2 great quantities of plate are used in private houses1 and all the churches are full of it4 ,by this means provision and labour still remain much cheaper among them than in nations that are not half so rich in gold and silver4 ,the advantages of this situation in point of trade1 as well as in great public emergencies1 are too evident to be disputed4 ,the same fashion a few years ago prevailed in ,genoa which still has place in ,england and ,holland1 of using services of china ware instead of plate2 but the ,senate1 wisely foreseeing the consequence1 prohibited the use of that brittle commodity beyond a certain extent1 while the use of silver plate was left unlimited4 ,and ,i suppose1 in their late distresses1 they felt the good effect of this ordinance4 ,our tax on plate is1 perhaps1 in this view1 somewhat impolitic4 ,before the introduction of paper-money into our colonies1 they had gold and silver sufficient for their circulation4 ,since the introduction of that commodity1 the least inconveniency that has followed is the total banishment of the precious metals4 ,and after the abolition of paper1 can it be doubted but money will return1 while these colonies possess manufactures and commodities1 the only thing valuable in commerce1 and for whose sake alone all men desire money8 ,what pity ,lycurgus did not think of paper-credit when he wanted to banish gold and silver from ,sparta6 ,it would have served his purpose better than the lumps of iron he made use of as money1 and would also have prevented more effectually all commerce with strangers1 as being of so much less real and intrinsic value4 ,it must1 however1 be confessed that1 as all these questions of trade and money are extremely complicated1 there are certain lights in which this subject may be placed so as to represent the advantages of paper-credit and banks to be superior to their disadvantages4 ,that they banish specie and bullion from a state is undoubtedly true1 and whoever looks no farther than this circumstance does well to condemn them2 but specie and bullion are not of so great consequence as not to admit of a compensation1 and even an overbalance from the increase of industry and of credit which may be promoted by the right use of paper-money4 ,it is well known of what advantage it is to a merchant to be able to discount his bills upon occasion2 and everything that facilitates this species of traffic is favourable to the general commerce of a state4 ,but private bankers are enabled to give such credit by the credit they receive from the depositing of money in their shops2 and the ,bank of ,england in the same manner1 from the liberty they have to issue their notes in all payments4 ,there was an invention of this kind which was fallen upon some years ago by the banks of ,edinburgh1 and which1 as it is one of the most ingenious ideas that has been executed in commerce1 has also been found very advantageous to ,scotland4 ,it is there called a bank-credit1 and is of this nature3 ,a man goes to the bank and finds surety to the amount1 we shall suppose1 of five thousand pounds4 ,this money1 or any part of it1 he has the liberty of drawing out whenever he pleases1 and he pays only the ordinary interest for it while it is in his hands4 ,he may1 when he pleases1 repay any sum so small as twenty pounds1 and the interest is discounted from the very day of the repayment4 ,the advantages resulting from this contrivance are manifold4 ,as a man may find surety nearly to the amount of his substance1 and his bank-credit is equivalent to ready money1 a merchant does hereby in a manner coin his houses1 his household furniture1 the goods in his warehouse1 the foreign debts due to him1 his ships at sea2 and can1 upon occasion1 employ them in all payments as if they were the current money of the country4 ,if a man borrows five thousand pounds from a private hand1 besides that it is not always to be found when required1 he pays interest for it whether he be using it or not2 his bank-credit costs him nothing except during the very moment in which it is of service to him1 and this circumstance is of equal advantage as if he had borrowed money at much lower interest4 ,merchants likewise from this invention acquire a great facility in supporting each other's credit1 which is a considerable security against bankruptcies4 ,a man1 when his own bank-credit is exhausted1 goes to any of his neighbours who is not in the same condition1 and he gets the money1 which he replaces at his convenience4 ,after this practice had taken place during some years at ,edinburgh1 several companies of merchants at ,glasgow carried the matter farther4 ,they associated themselves into different banks and issued notes so low as ten shillings1 which they used in all payments for goods1 manufactures1 tradesmen1 labour of all kinds2 and these notes1 from the established credit of the companies1 passed as money in all payments throughout the country4 ,by this means a stock of five thousand pounds was able to perform the same operations as if it were ten1 and merchants were thereby enabled to trade to a greater extent1 and to require less profit in all their transactions4 ,in ,newcastle and ,bristol1 as well as other trading places1 the merchants have since instituted banks of a like nature1 in imitation of those in ,glasgow4 ,but whatever other advantages result from these inventions1 it must still be allowed that they banish the precious metals2 and nothing can be a more evident proof of it than a comparison of the past and present condition of ,scotland in that particular4 ,it was found1 upon the recoinage made after the ,union1 that there was near a million of specie in that country2 but notwithstanding the great increase of riches1 commerce and manufactures of all kinds1 it is thought that1 even where there is no extraordinary drain made by ,england1 the current specie will not now amount to a fifth of that sum4 ,but as our projects of paper-credit are almost the only expedient by which we can sink money below its level1 so1 in my opinion1 the only expedient by which we can raise money above its level is a practice which we should all exclaim against as destructive--viz41 the gathering large sums into a public treasure1 locking them up1 and absolutely preventing their circulation4 ,the fluid not communicating with the neighbouring element may1 by such an artifice1 be raised to what height we please4 ,to prove this we need only return to our first supposition of the annihilating the half or any part of our cash1 where we found that the immediate consequence of such an event would be the attraction of an equal sum from all the neighbouring kingdoms4 ,nor does there seem to be any necessary bounds set by the nature of things to this practice of hoarding4 ,a small city like ,geneva1 continuing this policy for ages1 might engross nine-tenths of the money of ,europe4 ,there seems1 indeed1 in the nature of man an invincible obstacle to that immense growth of riches4 ,a weak state with an enormous treasure will soon become a prey to some of its poorer but more powerful neighbours2 a great state would dissipate its wealth in dangerous and ill-concerted projects1 and probably destroy with it what is much more valuable--the industry1 morals1 and number of its people4 ,the fluid in this case1 raised to too great a height1 bursts and destroys the vessel that contains it1 and mixing itself with the surrounding element1 soon falls to its proper level4 ,so little are we commonly acquainted with this principle that1 though all historians agree in relating uniformly so recent an event as the immense treasure amassed by ,harry ,,vii4 7which they make amount to #a1gjj1jjj71 we rather reject their concurring testimony than admit of a fact which agrees so ill with our inveterate prejudices4 ,it is indeed probable that that sum might be three-fourths of all the money in ,england2 but where is the difficulty that such a sum might be amassed in twenty years by a cunning1 rapacious1 frugal1 and almost absolute monarch8 ,nor is it probable that the diminution of circulating money was ever sensibly felt by the people1 or ever did them any prejudice4 ,the sinking of the prices of all commodities would immediately replace it1 by giving ,england the advantage in its commerce with all the neighbouring kingdoms4 ,have we not an instance in the small republic of ,athens with its allies1 who in about fifty years between the ,median and ,peloponnesian ,wars amassed a sum greater than that of ,harry ,,vii48#bj for all the ,greek historians and orators agree that the ,athenians collected in the citadel more than #aj1jjj talents1 which they afterwards dissipated1 to their own ruin1 in rash and imprudent enterprises4 ,but when this money was set a-running1 and began to communicate with the surrounding fluid1 what was the consequence8 ,did it remain in the state8 ,no2 for we find by the memorable census mentioned by ,demosthenes and ,polybius that1 in about fifty years afterwards1 the whole value of the republic1 comprehending lands1 houses1 commodities1 slaves1 and money was less than #fjjj talents4 ,what an ambitious1 high-spirited people was this1 to collect and keep in their treasury1 with a view to conquests1 a sum which it was every day in the power of the citizens1 by a single vote1 to distribute among themselves1 and which would go near to triple the riches of every individual2 for we must observe that the numbers and private riches of the ,athenians are said by ancient writers to have been no greater at the beginning of the ,peloponnesian ,war than at the beginning of the ,macedonian4 ,money was little more plentiful in ,greece during the age of ,philip and ,perseus than in ,england during that of ,harry ,,vii41 yet these two monarchs in thirty years collected from the small kingdom of ,macedon a much larger treasure than that of the ,english monarch4 ,paulus milius brought to ,rome about #a1gjj1jjj sterling--,pliny says #b1djj1jjj--;and that was but a part of the ,macedonian treasure2 the rest was dissipated by the resistance and flight of ,perseus4 ,we may learn from ,stanyan that the ,canton of ,berne had #cjj1jjj lent at interest1 and had above six times as much in their treasury4 ,here1 then1 is a sum hoarded of #a1hjj1jjj sterling1 which is at least quadruple of what should naturally circulate in such a petty state2 and yet no one who travels into the ,pais de ,vaux1 or any part of that canton1 observes any want of money more than could be supposed in a country of that extent1 soil1 and situation4 ,on the contrary1 there are scarce any inland provinces in the countries of ,france or ,germany where the inhabitants are at this time so opulent1 though that canton has vastly increased its treasure since #agad1 the time when ,stanyan wrote his judicious account of ,switzerland4#ba ,the account given by ,appian of the treasure of the ,ptolemies is so prodigious that one cannot admit of it1 and so much the less because the historian says the other successors of ,alexander were all so frugal1 and had many of them treasures not much inferior2 for this saving humour of the neighbouring princes must necessarily have checked the frugality of the ,egyptian monarchs1 according to the foregoing theory4 ,the sum he mentions is #gdj1jjj talents1 or #aia1aff1fff #acs4 #d;d41 according to ,dr4 ,arbuthnot's computation2 and yet ,appian says that he extracted his account from the public records1 and he was himself a native of ,alexandria4 ,from these principles we may learn what judgment we ought to form of those numberless bars1 obstructions1 and imposts which all nations of ,europe1 and none more than ,england1 have put upon trade1 from an exorbitant desire of amassing money1 which never will heap up beyond its level while it circulates2 or from an ill-grounded apprehension of losing their specie1 which never will sink below it4 ,could anything scatter our riches1 it would be such impolitic contrivances4 ,but this general ill effect1 however1 results from them1 that they deprive neighbouring nations of that free communication and exchange which the ,author of the world has intended1 by giving them soils1 climates1 and geniuses so different from each other4 ,our modern politics embrace the only method of banishing money--the using paper-credit2 they reject the only method of amassing it1 the practice of hoarding2 and they adopt a hundred contrivances which serve to no purpose but to check industry1 and rob ourselves and our neighbours of the common benefits of art and nature4 ,all taxes1 however1 upon foreign commodities are not to be regarded as prejudicial or useless1 but those only which are founded on the jealousy above mentioned4 ,a tax on ,german linen encourages home manufactures1 and thereby multiplies our people and industry2 a tax on brandy increases the sale of rum1 and supports our southern colonies4 ,and as it is necessary imposts should be levied for the support of government1 it may be thought more convenient to lay them on foreign commodities1 which can easily be intercepted at the port and subjected to the impost4 ,we ought1 however1 always to remember the maxim of ,dr4 ,swift1 that1 in the arithmetic of the customs1 two and two make not four1 but often make only one4 ,it can scarcely be doubted but if the duties on wine were lowered to a third1 they would yield much more to the ,government than at present2 our people might thereby afford to drink commonly a better and more wholesome liquor1 and no prejudice would ensue to the balance of trade1 of which we are so jealous4 ,the manufacture of ale beyond the agriculture is but inconsiderable1 and gives employment to few hands4 ,the transport of wine and corn would not be much inferior4 ,but are there not frequent instances1 you will say1 of states and kingdoms which were formerly rich and opulent1 and are now poor and beggarly8 ,has not the money left them with which they formerly abounded8 ,i answer1 if they lose their trade1 industry1 and people1 they cannot expect to keep their gold and silver1 for these precious metals will hold proportion to the former advantages4 ,when ,lisbon and ,amsterdam got the ,east ,india trade from ,venice and ,genoa1 they also got the profits and money which arose from it4 ,where the seat of government is transferred1 where expensive armies are maintained at a distance1 where great funds are possessed by foreigners1 there naturally follows from these causes a diminution of the specie4 ,but these1 we may observe1 are violent and forcible methods of carrying away money1 and are in time commonly attended with the transport of people and industry2 but where these remain1 and the drain is not continued1 the money always finds its way back again1 by a hundred canals of which we have no notion or suspicion4 ,what immense treasures have been spent1 by so many nations1 in ,flanders since the revolution1 in the course of three long wars6 ,more money perhaps than the half of what is at present in all ,europe4 ,but what has now become of it8 ,is it in the narrow compass of the ,austrian provinces8 ,no1 surely2 it has most of it returned to the several countries whence it came1 and has followed that art and industry by which at first it was acquired4 ,for above a thousand years the money of ,europe has been flowing to ,rome by an open and sensible current2 but it has been emptied by many secret and insensible canals1 and the want of industry and commerce renders at present the papal dominions the poorest territories in all ,italy4 ,in short1 a government has great reason to preserve with care its people and its manufactures4 ,its money it may safely trust to the course of human affairs1 without fear or jealousy2 or if it ever give attention to this latter circumstance1 it ought only to be so far as it affects the former4 ,,notes1 ,,of ,,the ,,balance ,,of ,,trade4 #ag ,there is another cause1 though more limited in its operation1 which checks the wrong balance of trade1 to every particular nation to which the kingdom trades4 ,when we import more goods than we export1 the exchange turns against us1 and this becomes a new encouragement to export1 as much as the charge of carriage and insurance of the money which becomes due would amount to4 ,for the exchange can never rise higher than that sum4 #ah ,it must carefully be remarked that throughout this discourse1 wherever ,i speak of the level of money ,i mean always its proportional level to the commodities1 labour1 industry1 and skill which is in the several states2 and ,i assert that where these advantages are double1 treble1 quadruple to what they are in the neighbouring states1 the money infallibly will also be double1 treble1 quadruple4 ,the only circumstance that can obstruct the exactness of these proportions is the expense of transporting the commodities from one place to another1 and this expense is sometimes unequal4 ,thus the corn1 cattle1 cheese1 butter of ,derbyshire cannot draw the money of ,london so much as the manufactures of ,london draw the money of ,derbyshire4 ,but this objection is only a seeming one1 for so far as the transport of commodities is expensive1 so far is the communication between the places obstructed and imperfect4 #ai ,we observed in essay ,of ,money1 that money1 when increasing1 gives encouragement to industry during the interval between the increase of money and the rise of the prices4 ,a good effect of this nature may follow too from paper-credit2 but it is dangerous to precipitate matters at the risk of losing all by the failing of that credit1 as must happen upon any violent shock in public affairs4 #bj ,there were about eight ounces of silver in a pound sterling in ,harry ,,vii4's time4 #ba ,the poverty which ,stanyan speaks of is only to be seen in the most mountainous cantons1 where there is no commodity to bring money2 and even there the people are not poorer than in the diocese of ,saltsburg on the one hand1 or ,savoy on the other4 ,,of ,,the ,,jealousy ,,of ,,trade4 ,having endeavoured to remove one species of ill-founded jealousy which is so prevalent among commercial nations1 it may not be amiss to mention another which seems equally groundless4 ,nothing is more usual1 among states which have made some advances in commerce1 than to look on the progress of their neighbours with a suspicious eye1 to consider all trading states as their rivals1 and to suppose that it is impossible for any of them to flourish but at their expense4 ,in opposition to this narrow and malignant opinion1 ,i will venture to assert that the increase of riches and commerce in any one nation1 instead of hurting1 commonly promotes the riches and commerce of all its neighbours2 and that a state can scarcely carry its trade and industry very far where all the surrounding states are buried in ignorance1 sloth1 and barbarism4 ,it is obvious that the domestic industry of a people cannot be hurt by the greatest prosperity of their neighbours2 and as this branch of commerce is undoubtedly the most important in any extensive kingdom1 we are so far removed from all reason of jealousy4 ,but ,i go farther1 and observe that where an open communication is preserved among nations1 it is impossible but the domestic industry of every one must receive an increase from the improvements of the others4 ,compare the situation of ,great ,britain at present with what it was two centuries ago4 ,all the arts1 both of agriculture and manufactures1 were then extremely rude and imperfect4 ,every improvement which we have since made has arisen from our imitation of foreigners1 and we ought so far to esteem it happy that they had previously made advances in arts and ingenuity4 ,but this intercourse is still upheld to our great advantage4 ,notwithstanding the advanced state of our manufactures1 we daily adopt in every art the inventions and improvements of our neighbours4 ,the commodity is first imported from abroad1 to our great discontent1 while we imagine that it drains us of our money2 afterwards the art itself is gradually imported1 to our visible advantage4 ,yet we continue still to repine that our neighbours should possess any art1 industry1 and invention1 forgetting that had they not first instructed us we should have been at present barbarians1 and did they not still continue their instructions1 the arts must fall into a state of languor1 and lose that emulation and novelty which contribute so much to their advancement4 ,the increase of domestic industry lays the foundation of foreign commerce4 ,where a great number of commodities are raised and perfected for the home-market there will always be found some which can be exported with advantage4 ,but if our neighbours have no art nor cultivation1 they cannot take them1 because they will have nothing to give in exchange4 ,in this respect1 states are in the same condition as individuals4 ,a single man can scarce be industrious where all his fellow-citizens are idle4 ,the riches of the several members of a community contribute to increase my riches1 whatever profession ,i may follow4 ,they consume the produce of my industry1 and afford me the produce of theirs in return4 ,nor need any state entertain apprehensions that their neighbours will improve to such a degree in every art and manufacture as to have no demand from them4 ,nature1 by giving a diversity of geniuses1 climates1 and soils to different nations1 has secured their mutual intercourse and commerce1 as long as they all remain industrious and civilized4 ,nay1 the more the arts increase in any state1 the more will be its demands from its industrious neighbours4 ,the inhabitants1 having become opulent and skilful1 desire to have every commodity in the utmost perfection2 and as they have plenty of commodities to give in exchange1 they make large importations from every foreign country4 ,the industry of the nations from whom they import receives encouragement2 their own is also increased by the sale of the commodities which they give in exchange4 ,but what if a nation has any staple commodity1 such as the woollen manufacture is to ,england8 ,must not the interfering of their neighbours in that manufacture be a loss to them8 ,i answer that when any commodity is denominated the staple of a kingdom1 it is supposed that that kingdom has some peculiar and natural advantages for raising the commodity2 and if1 notwithstanding these advantages1 they lose such a manufactory1 they ought to blame their own idleness or bad government1 not the industry of their neighbours4 ,it ought also to be considered that by the increase of industry among the neighbouring nations the consumption of every particular species of commodity is also increased2 and though foreign manufactures interfere with us in the market1 the demand for our product may still continue1 or even increase4 ,and even should it diminish1 ought the consequence to be esteemed so fatal8 ,if the spirit of industry be preserved1 it may easily be diverted from one branch to another1 and the manufactures of wool1 for instance1 be employed in linen1 silk1 iron1 or other commodities for which there appears to be a demand4 ,we need not apprehend that all the objects of industry will be exhausted1 or that our manufacturers1 while they remain on an equal footing with those of our neighbours1 will be in danger of wanting employment2 the emulation among rival nations serves rather to keep industry alive in all of them4 ,and any people is happier who possess a variety of manufactures1 than if they enjoyed one single great manufacture1 in which they are all employed4 ,their situation is less precarious1 and they will feel less sensibly those revolutions and uncertainties to which every particular branch of commerce will always be exposed4 ,the only commercial state which ought to dread the improvements and industry of their neighbours is such a one as ,holland1 which enjoying no extent of land1 nor possessing any native commodity1 flourishes only by being the brokers1 and factors1 and carriers of others4 ,such a people may naturally apprehend that as soon as the neighbouring states come to know and pursue their interest1 they will take into their own hands the management of their affairs1 and deprive their brokers of that profit which they formerly reaped from it4 ,but though this consequence may naturally be dreaded1 it is very long before it takes place2 and by art and industry it may be warded off for many generations1 if not wholly eluded4 ,the advantage of superior stocks and correspondence is so great that it is not easily overcome2 and as all the transactions increase by the increase of industry in the neighbouring states1 even a people whose commerce stands on this precarious basis may at first reap a considerable profit from the flourishing condition of their neighbours4 ,the ,dutch1 having mortgaged all their revenues1 make not such a figure in political transactions as formerly2 but their commerce is surely equal to what it was in the middle of the last century1 when they were reckoned among the great powers of ,europe4 ,were our narrow and malignant politics to meet with success1 we should reduce all our neighbouring nations to the same state of sloth and ignorance that prevails in ,morocco and the coast of ,barbary4 ,but what would be the consequence8 ,they could send us no commodities1 they could take none from us4 ,our domestic commerce itself would languish for want of emulation1 example1 and instruction2 and we ourselves should soon fall into the same abject condition to which we had reduced them4 ,i shall therefore venture to acknowledge that not only as a man1 but as a ,british subject1 ,i pray for the flourishing commerce of ,germany1 ,spain1 ,italy1 and even ,france itself4 ,i am at least certain that ,great ,britain and all these nations would flourish more did their sovereigns and ministers adopt such enlarged and benevolent sentiments towards each other4 ,,of ,,the ,,balance ,,of ,,power4 ,it is a question whether the idea of the balance of power be owing entirely to modern policy1 or whether the phrase only has been invented in these latter ages4 ,it is certain that ,xenophon1 in his institution of ,cyrus1 represents the combination of the ,asiatic powers to have arisen from a jealousy of the increasing force of the ,medes and ,persians2 and though that elegant composition should be supposed altogether a romance1 this sentiment1 ascribed by the author to the ,eastern princes1 is at least a proof of the prevailing notions of ancient times4 ,in all the politics of ,greece the anxiety with regard to the balance of power is most apparent1 and is expressly pointed out to us even by the ancient historians4 ,thucydides represents the league which was formed against ,athens1 and which produced the ,peloponnesian war1 as entirely owing to this principle4 ,and after the decline of ,athens1 when the ,thebans and ,lacedemonians disputed for sovereignty1 we find that the ,athenians 7as well as many other republics7 threw themselves always into the lighter scale1 and endeavoured to preserve the balance4 ,they supported ,thebes against ,sparta1 till the great victory gained by ,epaminondas at ,leuctra1 after which they immediately went over to the conquered1 from generosity as they pretended1 but in reality from their jealousy of the conquerors4 ,whoever will read ,demosthenes' oration for the ,megalopolitans may see the utmost refinements on this principle which ever entered into the head of a ,venetian or ,english speculatist2 and upon the first rise of the ,macedonian power1 this orator immediately discovered the danger1 sounded the alarm through all ,greece1 and at last assembled that confederacy under the banners of ,athens which fought the great and decisive battle of ,chronea4 ,it is true the ,grecian wars are regarded by historians as wars of emulation rather than of politics1 and each state seems to have had more in view the honour of leading the rest than any well-grounded hopes of authority and dominion4 ,if we consider1 indeed1 the small number of inhabitants in any one republic compared to the whole1 the great difficulty of forming sieges in those times1 and the extraordinary bravery and discipline of every freeman among that noble people1 we shall conclude that the balance of power was of itself sufficiently secured in ,greece1 and needed not to be guarded with that caution which may be requisite in other ages4 ,but whether we ascribe the shifting sides in all the ,grecian republics to jealous emulation or cautious politics1 the effects were alike1 and every prevailing power was sure to meet with a confederacy against it1 and that often composed of its former friends and allies4 ,the same principle--call it envy or prudence--which produced the ostracism of ,athens and petalism of ,syracuse1 and expelled every citizen whose fame or power overtopped the rest--the same principle1 ,i say1 naturally discovered itself in foreign politics1 and soon raised enemies to the leading state1 however moderate in the exercise of its authority4 ,the ,persian monarch was really1 in his force1 a petty prince compared to the ,grecian republics1 and therefore it behoved him1 from views of safety more than from emulation1 to interest himself in their quarrels1 and to support the weaker side in every contest4 ,this was the advice given by ,alcibiades to ,tissaphernes1 and it prolonged near a century the date of the ,persian empire2 till the neglect of it for a moment1 after the first appearance of the aspiring genius of ,philip1 brought that lofty and frail edifice to the ground with a rapidity of which there are few instances in the history of mankind4 ,the successors of ,alexander showed an infinite jealousy of the balance of power1 a jealousy founded on true politics and prudence1 and which preserved distinct for several ages the partitions made after the death of that famous conqueror4 ,the fortune and ambition of ,antigonus threatened them anew with a universal monarchy1 but their combination and their victory at ,ipsus saved them2 and in after times we find that as the ,eastern princes considered the ,greeks and ,macedonians as the only real military force with whom they had any intercourse1 they kept always a watchful eye over that part of the world4 ,the ,ptolemies1 in particular1 supported first ,aratus and the ,achans1 and then ,cleomenes ,king of ,sparta1 from no other view than as a counterbalance to the ,macedonian monarchs2 for this is the account which ,polybius gives of the ,egyptian politics4 ,the reason why it is supposed that the ancients were entirely ignorant of the balance of power seems to be drawn from the ,roman history more than the ,grecian1 and as the transactions of the former are generally the most familiar to us1 we have thence formed all our conclusions4 ,it must be owned that the ,romans never met with any such general combination or confederacy against them as might naturally be expected from their rapid conquests and declared ambition1 but were allowed peaceably to subdue their neighbours1 one after another1 till they extended their dominion over the whole known world4 ,not to mention the fabulous history of their ,italic wars1 there was1 upon ,hannibal's invasion of the ,roman state1 a very remarkable crisis which ought to have called up the attention of all civilized nations4 ,it appeared afterwards 7nor was it difficult to be observed at the time#bb7 that this was a contest for universal empire1 and yet no prince or state seems to have been in the least alarmed about the event or issue of the quarrel4 ,philip of ,macedon remained neuter till he saw the victories of ,hannibal1 and then most imprudently formed an alliance with the conqueror1 upon terms still more imprudent4 ,he stipulated that he was to assist the ,carthaginian state in their conquest of ,italy1 after which they engaged to send over forces into ,greece1 to assist him in subduing the ,grecian commonwealths4 ,the ,rhodean and ,achan republics are much celebrated by ancient historians for their wisdom and sound policy2 yet both of them assisted the ,romans in their wars against ,philip and ,antiochus4 ,and what may be esteemed still a stronger proof that this maxim was not familiarly known in those ages1 no ancient author has ever remarked the imprudence of these measures1 nor has even blamed that absurd treaty above-mentioned made by ,philip with the ,carthaginians4 ,princes and statesmen may in all ages be blinded in their reasonings with regard to events beforehand1 but it is somewhat extraordinary that historians afterwards should not form a sounder judgment of them4 ,massinissa1 ,attalus1 ,prusias1 in satisfying their private passions1 were all of them the instruments of the ,roman greatness1 and never seem to have suspected that they were forging their own chains while they advanced the conquests of their ally4 ,a simple treaty and agreement between ,massinissa and the ,carthaginians1 so much required by mutual interest1 barred the ,romans from all entrance into ,africa1 and preserved liberty to mankind4 ,the only prince we meet with in the ,roman history who seems to have understood the balance of power is ,hiero1 ,king of ,syracuse4 ,though the ally of ,rome1 he sent assistance to the ,carthaginians during the war of the auxiliaries3 8,esteeming it requisite10 says ,polybius1 8both in order to retain his dominions in ,sicily and to preserve the ,roman friendship1 that ,carthage should be safe2 lest by its fall the remaining power should be able1 without contrast or opposition1 to execute every purpose and undertaking4 ,and here he acted with great wisdom and prudence2 for that is never1 on any account1 to be overlooked1 nor ought such a force ever to be thrown into one hand as to incapacitate the neighbouring states from defending their rights against it40 ,here is the aim of modern politics pointed out in express terms4 ,in short1 the maxim of preserving the balance of power is founded so much on common sense and obvious reasoning that it is impossible it could altogether have escaped antiquity1 where we find1 in other particulars1 so many marks of deep penetration and discernment4 ,if it was not so generally known and acknowledged as at present1 it had at least an influence on all the wiser and more experienced princes and politicians2 and indeed1 even at present1 however generally known and acknowledged among speculative reasoners1 it has not1 in practice1 an authority much more extensive among those who govern the world4 ,after the fall of the ,roman ,empire the form of government established by the northern conquerors incapacitated them in a great measure from further conquests1 and long maintained each state in its proper boundaries2 but when vassalage and the feudal militia were abolished mankind were anew alarmed by the danger of universal monarchy1 from the union of so many kingdoms and principalities in the person of the ,emperor ,charles4 ,but the power of the house of ,austria1 founded on extensive but divided dominions1 and their riches1 derived chiefly from mines of gold and silver1 were more likely to decay1 of themselves1 from internal defects1 than to overthrow all the bulwarks raised against them4 ,in less than a century the force of that violent and haughty race was shattered1 their opulence dissipated1 their splendour eclipsed4 ,a new power succeeded1 more formidable to the liberties of ,europe1 possessing all the advantages of the former and labouring under none of its defects1 except a share of that spirit of bigotry and persecution with which the house of ,austria were so long and still are so much infatuated4 ,europe has now1 for above a century1 remained on the defensive against the greatest force that ever perhaps was formed by the civil or political combination of mankind4 ,and such is the influence of the maxim here treated of1 that though that ambitious nation in the five last general wars has been victorious in four1#bc and unsuccessful only in one1#bd they have not much enlarged their dominions1 nor acquired a total ascendant over ,europe4 ,there remains rather room to hope that by maintaining the resistance some time the natural revolutions of human affairs1 together with unforeseen events and accidents1 may guard us against universal monarchy1 and preserve the world from so great an evil4 ,in the three last of these general wars ,britain has stood foremost in the glorious struggle1 and she still maintains her station as guardian of the general liberties of ,europe1 and patron of mankind4 ,beside her advantages of riches and situation1 her people are animated with such a national spirit1 and are so fully sensible of the inestimable blessings of their government1 that we may hope their vigour never will languish in so necessary and so just a cause4 ,on the contrary1 if we may judge by the past1 their passionate ardour seems rather to require some moderation1 and they have oftener erred from a laudable excess than from a blameable deficiency4 ,in the first place1 we seem to have been more possessed with the ancient ,greek spirit of jealous emulation than actuated with the prudent views of modern politics4 ,our wars with ,france have been begun with justice1 and even1 perhaps1 from necessity2 but have always been too far pushed from obstinacy and passion4 ,the same peace which was afterwards made at ,ryswick in #afig was offered so early as the ninety-two2 that concluded at ,utrecht in #agab might have been finished on as good conditions at ,gertruytenberg in the eight2 and we might have given at ,frankfort in #agdc the same terms which we were glad to accept of at ,aix-la-,chapelle in the forty-eight4 ,here then we see that above half of our wars with ,france1 and all our public debts1 are owing more to our own imprudent vehemence than to the ambition of our neighbours4 ,in the second place1 we are so declared in our opposition to ,french power1 and so alert in defence of our allies1 that they always reckon upon our force as upon their own1 and expecting to carry on war at our expense1 refuse all reasonable terms of accommodation4 ,habent subjectos1 tanquam suos2 viles1 ut alienos4 ,all the world knows that the factious vote of the ,house of ,commons in the beginning of the last ,parliament1 with the professed humour of the nation1 made the ,queen of ,hungary inflexible in her terms1 and prevented that agreement with ,prussia which would immediately have restored the general tranquillity of ,europe4 ,in the third place1 we are such true combatants that1 when once engaged1 we lose all concern for ourselves and our posterity1 and consider only how we may best annoy the enemy4 ,to mortgage our revenues at so deep a rate in wars where we are only accessories was surely the most fatal delusion that a nation1 who had any pretension to politics and prudence1 has ever yet been guilty of4 ,that remedy of funding--if it be a remedy and not rather a poison--ought1 in all reason1 to be reserved to the last extremity1 and no evil but the greatest and most urgent should ever induce us to embrace so dangerous an expedient4 ,these excesses to which we have been carried are prejudicial1 and may perhaps in time become still more prejudicial another way1 by begetting1 as is usual1 the opposite extreme1 and rendering us totally careless and supine with regard to the fate of ,europe4 ,the ,athenians1 from the most bustling1 intriguing1 warlike people of ,greece1 finding their error in thrusting themselves into every quarrel1 abandoned all attention to foreign affairs1 and in no contest ever took party on either side1 except by their flatteries and complaisance to the victor4 ,enormous monarchies are probably destructive to human nature--in their progress1 in their continuance1#be and even in their downfall1 which never can be very distant from their establishment4 ,the military genius which aggrandized the monarchy soon leaves the court1 the capital1 and the centre of such a government2 while the wars are carried on at a great distance1 and interest so small a part of the state4 ,the ancient nobility1 whose affections attach them to their sovereign1 live all at court2 and never will accept of military employments which would carry them to remote and barbarous frontiers1 where they are distant both from their pleasures and their fortune4 ,the arms of the state must therefore be trusted to mercenary strangers1 without zeal1 without attachment1 without honour1 ready on every occasion to turn them against the prince1 and join each desperate malcontent who offers pay and plunder4 ,this is the necessary progress of human affairs2 thus human nature checks itself in its airy elevations1 thus ambition blindly labours for the destruction of the conqueror1 of his family1 and of everything near and dear to him4 ,the ,bourbons1 trusting to the support of their brave1 faithful1 and affectionate nobility1 would push their advantage without reserve or limitation4 ,these1 while fired with glory and emulation1 can bear the fatigues and dangers of war2 but never would submit to languish in the garrisons of ,hungary or ,lithuania1 forgot at court1 and sacrificed to the intrigues of every minion or mistress who approaches the prince4 ,the troops are filled with ,cravates and ,tartars1 ,hussars and ,cossacks1 intermingled perhaps with a few soldiers of fortune from the better provinces2 and the melancholy fate of the ,roman emperors1 from the same cause1 is renewed over and over again till the final dissolution of the monarchy4 ,,notes1 ,,of ,,the ,,balance ,,of ,,power4 #bb ,it was observed by some1 as appears from the speech of ,agelaus of ,naupactum1 in the general congress of ,greece4 ,see ,polyb41 lib4 #e1 cap4 #ajd4 #bc ,those concluded by the ,peace of the ,pyrenees1 ,nimeguen1 ,ryswick1 and ,aix-la-,chapelle4 #bd ,that concluded by the ,peace of ,utrecht4 #be ,if the ,roman ,empire was of advantage1 it could only proceed from this1 that mankind were generally in a very disorderly1 uncivilized condition before its establishment4 ,,of ,,taxes4 ,there is a maxim that prevails among those whom in this country we call 8ways and means0 men1 and who are denominated financiers and maltotiers in ,france1 that every new tax creates a new ability in the subject to bear it1 and that each increase of public burdens increases proportionably the industry of the people4 ,this maxim is of such a nature as is most likely to be extremely abused1 and is so much the more dangerous1 as its truth cannot be altogether denied2 but it must be owned1 when kept within certain bounds1 to have some foundation in reason and experience4 ,when a tax is laid upon commodities which are consumed by the common people1 the necessary consequence may seem to be that either the poor must retrench something from their way of living1 or raise their wages so as to make the burden of the tax fall entirely upon the rich4 ,but there is a third consequence which very often follows upon taxes--viz41 that the poor increase their industry1 perform more work1 and live as well as before without demanding more for their labour4 ,where taxes are moderate1 are laid on gradually1 and affect not the necessaries of life1 this consequence naturally follows2 and it is certain that such difficulties often serve to excite the industry of a people1 and render them more opulent and laborious than others who enjoy the greatest advantages4 ,for we may observe1 as a parallel instance1 that the most commercial nations have not always possessed the greatest extent of fertile land2 but1 on the contrary1 that they have laboured under many natural disadvantages4 ,tyre1 ,athens1 ,carthage1 ,rhodes1 ,genoa1 ,venice1 ,holland are strong examples to this purpose2 and in all history we find only three instances of large and fertile countries which have possessed much trade--the ,netherlands1 ,england1 and ,france4 ,the two former seem to have been allured by the advantages of their maritime situation1 and the necessity they lay under of frequenting foreign ports in order to procure what their own climate refused them2 and as to ,france1 trade has come very late into the kingdom1 and seems to have been the effect of reflection and observation in an ingenious and enterprising people1 who remarked the immense riches acquired by such of the neighbouring nations as cultivated navigation and commerce4 ,the places mentioned by ,cicero as possessed of the greatest commerce of his time are ,alexandria1 ,colchos1 ,tyre1 ,sidon1 ,andros1 ,cyprus1 ,pamphylia1 ,lycia1 ,rhodes1 ,chios1 ,byzantium1 ,lesbos1 ,smyrna1 ,miletum1 ,coos4 ,all these1 except ,alexandria1 were either small islands or narrow territories2 and that city owed its trade entirely to the happiness of its situation4 ,since1 therefore1 some natural necessities or disadvantages may be thought favourable to industries1 why may not artificial burdens have the same effect8 ,sir ,william ,temple1#bf we may observe1 ascribes the industry of the ,dutch entirely to necessity1 proceeding from their natural disadvantages2 and illustrates his doctrine by a very striking comparison with ,ireland1 8where10 says he1 8by the largeness and plenty of the soil1 and scarcity of people1 all things necessary to life are so cheap that an industrious man by two days' labour may gain enough to feed him the rest of the week4 ,which ,i take to be a very plain ground of the laziness attributed to the people4 ,for men naturally prefer ease before labour1 and will not take pains if they can live idle2 though when1 by necessity1 they have been inured to it1 they cannot leave it1 being grown a custom necessary to their health1 and to their very entertainment4 ,nor perhaps is the change harder from constant ease to labour than from constant labour to ease40 ,after which the author proceeds to confirm his doctrine by enumerating as above the places where trade has most flourished in ancient and modern times1 and which are commonly observed by such narrow1 confined territories as beget a necessity for industry4 ,it is always observed in years of scarcity1 if it be not extreme1 that the poor labour more and really live better than in years of great plenty1 when they indulge themselves in idleness and riot4 ,i have been told by a considerable manufacturer that in the year #agdj1 when bread and provisions of all kinds were very dear1 his workmen not only made a shift to live1 but paid debts which they had contracted in former years that were much more favourable and abundant4 ,this doctrine1 therefore1 with regard to taxes may be admitted to some degree1 but beware of the abuse4 ,exorbitant taxes1 like extreme necessity1 destroy industry by producing despair2 and even before they reach this pitch they raise the wages of the labourer and manufacturer1 and heighten the price of all commodities4 ,an attentive1 disinterested legislature will observe the point when the emolument ceases and the prejudice begins2 but as the contrary character is much more common1 it is to be feared that taxes all over ,europe are multiplying to such a degree as will entirely crush all art and industry2 though perhaps their first increase1 together with circumstances1 might have contributed to the growth of these advantages4 ,the best taxes are such as are levied upon consumptions1 especially those of luxury1 because such taxes are less felt by the people4 ,they seem1 in some measure1 voluntary1 since a man may choose how far he will use the commodity which is taxed3 they are paid gradually and insensibly1 and being confounded with the natural price of the commodity1 they are scarcely perceived by the consumers4 ,their only disadvantage is that they are expensive in the levying4 ,taxes upon possessions are levied without expense1 but have every other disadvantage4 ,most states1 however1 are obliged to have recourse to them1 in order to supply the deficiencies of the other4 ,but the most pernicious of all taxes are those which are arbitrary4 ,they are commonly converted by their management into punishments on industry2 and also by their unavoidable inequality are more grievous than by the real burden which they impose4 ,it is surprising1 therefore1 to see them have place among any civilized people4 ,in general1 all poll-taxes1 even when not arbitrary--which they commonly are--may be esteemed dangerous2 because it is so easy for the sovereign to add a little more and a little more to the sum demanded1 that these taxes are apt to become altogether oppressive and intolerable4 ,on the other hand1 a duty upon commodities checks itself1 and a prince will soon find that an increase of the impost is no increase of his revenue4 ,it is not easy1 therefore1 for a people to be altogether ruined by such taxes4 ,historians inform us that one of the chief causes of the destruction of the ,roman state was the alteration which ,constantine introduced into the finances1 by substituting a universal poll-tax in lieu of almost all the tithes1 customs1 and excises which formerly composed the revenue of the empire4 ,the people in all the provinces were so grinded and oppressed by the publicans that they were glad to take refuge under the conquering arms of the barbarians1 whose dominion1 as they had fewer necessities and less art1 was found preferable to the refined tyranny of the ,romans4 ,there is a prevailing opinion that all taxes1 however levied1 fall upon the land at last4 ,such an opinion may be useful in ,britain1 by checking the landed gentlemen1 in whose hands our legislature is chiefly lodged1 and making them preserve great regard for trade and industry2 but ,i must confess that this principle1 though first advanced by a celebrated writer1 has so little appearance of reason that were it not for his authority it had never been received by anybody4 ,every man1 to be sure1 is desirous of pushing off from himself the burden of any tax which is imposed1 and laying it upon others2 but as every man has the same inclination1 and is upon the defensive1 no set of men can be supposed to prevail altogether in this contest4 ,and why the landed gentleman should be the victim of the whole1 and should not be able to defend himself as well as others are1 ,i cannot readily imagine4 ,all tradesmen1 indeed1 would willingly prey upon him and divide him among them if they could2 but this inclination they always have1 though no taxes were levied2 and the same methods by which he guards against the imposition of tradesmen before taxes will serve him afterwards1 and make them share the burden with him4 ,no labour in any commodities that are exported can be very considerably raised in the price without losing the foreign market2 and as some part of almost every manufactory is exported1 this circumstance keeps the price of most species of labour nearly the same after the imposition of taxes4 ,i may add that it has this effect upon the whole1 for were any kind of labour paid beyond its proportion all hands would flock to it1 and would soon sink it to a level with the rest4 ,i shall conclude this subject with observing that we have with regard to taxes an instance of what frequently happens in political institutions1 that the consequence of things are diametrically opposite to what we should expect on the first appearance4 ,it is regarded as a fundamental maxim of the ,turkish ,government that the ,grand ,seignior1 though absolute master of the lives and fortunes of each individual1 has no authority to impose a new tax2 and every ,ottoman prince who has made such an attempt either has been obliged to retract1 or has found the fatal effects of his perseverance4 ,one would imagine that this prejudice or established opinion were the firmest barrier in the world against oppression1 yet it is certain that its effect is quite contrary4 ,the emperor1 having no regular method of increasing his revenue1 must allow all the pashas and governors to oppress and abuse the subjects1 and these he squeezes after their return from their government2 whereas1 if he could impose a new tax1 like our ,european princes1 his interest would so far be united with that of his people that he would immediately feel the bad effects of these disorderly levies of money1 and would find that a pound raised by general imposition would have less pernicious effects than a shilling taken in so unequal and arbitrary a manner4 ,,note1 ,,of ,,taxes4 #bf ,account of the ,netherlands1 chap4 vi4 ,,of ,,public ,,credit4 ,it appears to have been the common practice of antiquity to make provision in times of peace for the necessities of war1 and to hoard up treasures beforehand as the instruments either of conquest or defence1 without trusting to extraordinary imposts1 much less to borrowing1 in times of disorder and confusion4 ,besides the immense sums above mentioned#bg which were amassed by ,athens1 and by the ,ptolemies and other successors of ,alexander1 we learn from ,plato that the frugal ,lacedemonians had also collected a great treasure2 and ,arrian and ,plutarch#bh specify the riches which ,alexander got possession of on the conquest of ,susa and ,ecbatana1 and which were reserved1 some of them1 from the time of ,cyrus4 ,if ,i remember right1 the ,scripture also mentions the treasure of ,hezekiah and the ,jewish princes1 as profane history does that of ,philip and ,perseus1 kings of ,macedon4 ,the ancient republics of ,gaul had commonly large sums in reserve4 ,every one knows the treasure seized in ,rome by ,julius ,csar during the civil wars1 and we find afterwards that the wiser emperors1 ,augustus1 ,tiberius1 ,vespasian1 ,severus1 etc41 always discovered the prudent foresight of saving great sums against any public exigency4 ,on the contrary1 our modern expedient1 which has become very general1 is to mortgage the public revenues1 and to trust that posterity during peace will pay off the encumbrances contracted during the preceding war2 and they1 having before their eyes so good an example of their wise fathers1 have the same prudent reliance on their posterity1 who at last1 from necessity more than choice1 are obliged to place the same confidence in a new posterity4 ,but not to waste time in declaiming against a practice which appears ruinous beyond the evidence of a hundred demonstrations1 it seems pretty apparent that the ancient maxims are in this respect much more prudent than the modern2 even though the latter had been confined within some reasonable bounds1 and had ever1 in any one instance1 been attended with such frugality in time of peace as to discharge the debts incurred by an expensive war4 ,for why should the case be so very different between the public and an individual as to make us establish such different maxims of conduct for each8 ,if the funds of the former be greater1 its necessary expenses are proportionably larger2 if its resources be more numerous1 they are not infinite2 and as its frame should be calculated for a much longer duration than the date of a single life1 or even of a family1 it should embrace maxims1 large1 durable1 and generous1 agreeable to the supposed extent of its existence4 ,to trust to chances and temporary expedients is indeed what the necessity of human affairs frequently reduces it to1 but whoever voluntarily depend on such resources have not necessity but their own folly to accuse for their misfortunes when any such befall them4 ,if the abuses of treasures be dangerous1 either by engaging the state in rash enterprises or making it neglect military discipline in confidence of its riches1 the abuses of mortgaging are more certain and inevitable--poverty1 impotence1 and subjection to foreign powers4 ,according to modern policy1 war is attended with every destructive circumstance3 loss of men1 increase of taxes1 decay of commerce1 dissipation of money1 devastation by sea and land4 ,according to ancient maxims1 the opening of the public treasure1 as it produced an uncommon affluence of gold and silver1 served as a temporary encouragement to industry1 and atoned in some degree for the inevitable calamities of war4 ,what then shall we say to the new paradox1 that public encumbrances are1 of themselves1 advantageous1 independent of the necessity of contracting them2 and that any state1 even though it were not pressed by a foreign enemy1 could not possibly have embraced a wiser expedient for promoting commerce and riches than to create funds1 and debts1 and taxes without limitation8 ,discourses such as these might naturally have passed for trials of wit among rhetoricians1 like the panegyrics on folly and a fever1 on ,busiris and ,nero1 had we not seen such absurd maxims patronized by great ministers and by a whole party among us2 and these puzzling arguments 7for they deserve not the name of specious71 though they could not be the foundation of ,lord ,orford's conduct1 for he had more sense1 served at least to keep his partisans in countenance and perplex the understanding of the nation4 ,let us examine the consequences of public debts1 both in our domestic management by their influence on commerce and industry1 and in our foreign transactions by their effect on wars and negotiations4 ,there is a word which is here in the mouth of everybody1 and which ,i find has also got abroad and is much employed by foreign writers#bi in imitation of the ,english--and this is 8circulation40 ,this word serves as an account of everything1 and though ,i confess that ,i have sought for its meaning in the present subject ever since ,i was a schoolboy1 ,i have never yet been able to discover it4 ,what possible advantage is there which the nation can reap by the easy transference of stock from hand to hand8 ,or is there any parallel to be drawn from the circulation of other commodities to that of chequer notes and ,india bonds8 ,where a manufacturer has a quick sale of his goods to the merchant1 the merchant to the shopkeeper1 the shopkeeper to his customers1 this enlivens industry and gives new encouragement to the first dealer or the manufacturer and all his tradesmen1 and makes them produce more and better commodities of the same species4 ,a stagnation is here pernicious1 wherever it happens1 because it operates backwards1 and stops or benumbs the industrious hand in its production of what is useful to human life4 ,but what production we owe to ,change-alley1 or even what consumption1 except that of coffee1 and pen1 ink1 and paper1 ,i have not yet learned2 nor can one foresee the loss or decay of any one beneficial commerce or commodity1 though that place and all its inhabitants were for ever buried in the ocean4 ,but though this term has never been explained by those who insist so much on the advantages that result from a circulation1 there seems1 however1 to be some benefit of a similar kind arising from our encumbrances--as1 indeed1 what human evil is there which is not attended with some advantage8 ,this we shall endeavour to explain1 that we may estimate the weight which we ought to allow it4 ,public securities are with us become a kind of money1 and pass as readily at the current price as gold or silver4 ,wherever any profitable undertaking offers itself1 however expensive1 there are never wanting hands enough to embrace it2 nor need a trader who has sums in the public stocks fear to launch out into the most extensive trade1 since he is possessed of funds which will answer the most sudden demand that can be made upon him4 ,no merchant thinks it necessary to keep by him any considerable cash4 ,bank-notes or ,india bonds1 especially the latter1 serve all the same purposes2 because he can dispose of them or pledge them to a banker in a quarter of an hour2 and at the same time they are not idle1 even when in his escritoire1 but bring him in a constant revenue4 ,in short1 our national debts furnish merchants with a species of money that is continually multiplying in their hands1 and produces sure gain besides the profits of their commerce4 ,this must enable them to trade upon less profit4 ,the small profit of the merchant renders the commodity cheaper1 causes a greater consumption1 quickens the labour of the common people1 and helps to spread arts and industry through the whole society4 ,there are also1 we may observe1 in ,england and in all states which have both commerce and public debts1 a set of men who are half merchants1 half stock-holders1 and may be supposed willing to trade for small profits2 because commerce is not their principal or sole support1 and their revenues in the funds are a sure resource for themselves and their families4 ,were there no funds great merchants would have no expedient for realizing or securing any part of their profit but by making purchases of land1 and land has many disadvantages in comparison of funds4 ,requiring more care and inspection1 it divides the time and attention of the merchant2 upon any tempting offer or extraordinary accident in trade1 it is not so easily converted into money2 and as it attracts too much1 both by the many natural pleasures it affords and the authority it gives1 it soon converts the citizen into the country gentleman4 ,more men1 therefore1 with large stocks and incomes1 may naturally be supposed to continue in trade where there are public debts2 and this1 it must be owned1 is of some advantage to commerce by diminishing its profits1 promoting circulation1 and encouraging industry4 ,but1 in opposition to these two favourable circumstances1 perhaps of no very great importance1 weigh the many disadvantages which attend our public debts in the whole interior economy of the state2 you will find no comparison between the ill and the good which result from them4 ,first1 it is certain that national debts cause a mighty confluence of people and riches to the capital1 by the great sums which are levied in the provinces to pay the interest of those debts2 and perhaps1 too1 by the advantages in trade above mentioned1 which they give the merchants in the capital above the rest of the kingdom4 ,the question is1 whether1 in our case1 it be for the public interest that so many privileges should be conferred on ,london1 which has already arrived at such an enormous size and seems still increasing8 ,some men are apprehensive of the consequences4 ,for my part1 ,i cannot forbear thinking that though the head is undoubtedly too big for the body1 yet that great city is so happily situated that its excessive bulk causes less inconvenience than even a smaller capital to a greater kingdom4 ,there is more difference between the prices of all provisions in ,paris and ,languedoc than between those in ,london and ,yorkshire4 ,secondly1 public stocks1 being a kind of paper-credit1 have all the disadvantages attending that species of money4 ,they banish gold and silver from the most considerable commerce of the state1 reduce them to common circulation1 and by that means render all provisions and labour dearer than otherwise they would be4 ,thirdly1 the taxes which are levied to pay the interests of these debts are apt to be a check upon industry1 to heighten the price of labour1 and to be an oppression on the poorer sort4 ,fourthly1 as foreigners possess a share of our national funds1 they render the public in a manner tributary to them1 and may in time occasion the transport of our people and our industry4 ,fifthly1 the greatest part of public stock being always in the hands of idle people1 who live on their revenue1 our funds give great encouragement to a useless and inactive life4 ,but though the injury which arises to commerce and industry from our public funds will appear1 upon balancing the whole1 very considerable1 it is trivial in comparison of the prejudice which results to the state considered as a body politic1 which must support itself in the society of nations1 and have various transactions with other states1 in wars and negotiations4 ,the ill there is pure and unmixed1 without any favourable circumstance to atone for it1 and it is an ill too of a nature the highest and most important4 ,we have1 indeed1 been told that the public is no weaker upon account of its debts1 since they are mostly due among ourselves1 and bring as much property to one as they take from another4 ,it is like transferring money from the right hand to the left1 which leaves the person neither richer nor poorer than before4 ,such loose reasonings and specious comparisons will always pass where we judge not upon principles4 ,i ask1 is it possible1 in the nature of things1 to overburden a nation with taxes1 even where the sovereign resides among them8 ,the very doubt seems extravagant1 since it is requisite in every commonwealth that there be a certain proportion observed between the laborious and the idle part of it4 ,but if all our present taxes be mortgaged1 must we not invent new ones8 and may not this matter be carried to a length that is ruinous and destructive8 ,in every nation there are always some methods of levying money more easy than others1 agreeable to the way of living of the people and the commodities they make use of4 ,in ,britain the excises upon malt and beer afford a very large revenue1 because the operations of malting and brewing are very tedious1 and are impossible to be concealed2 and at the same time1 these commodities are not so absolutely necessary to life as that the raising their price would very much affect the poorer sort4 ,these taxes being all mortgaged1 what difficulty to find new ones6 what vexation and ruin of the poor6 ,duties upon consumptions are more equal and easy than those upon possessions4 ,what a loss to the public that the former are all exhausted1 and that we must have recourse to the more grievous method of levying taxes6 ,were all the proprietors of land only stewards to the public1 must not necessity force them to practise all the arts of oppression used by stewards1 where the absence or negligence of the proprietor render them secure against inquiry8 ,it will scarce be asserted that no bounds ought ever to be set to national debts1 and that the public would be no weaker were twelve or fifteen shillings in the pound land-tax mortgaged1 with the present customs and excises4 ,there is something therefore in the case beside the mere transferring of property from one hand to another4 ,in #ejj years the posterity of those now in the coaches and of those upon the boxes will probably have changed places1 without affecting the public by these revolutions4 ,suppose the public once fairly brought to that condition to which it is hastening with such amazing rapidity2 suppose the land to be taxed eighteen or nineteen shillings in the pound 7for it can never bear the whole twenty72 suppose all the excises and customs to be screwed up to the outmost which the nation can bear1 without entirely losing its commerce and industry2 and suppose that all those funds are mortgaged to perpetuity1 and that the invention and wit of all our projectors can find no new imposition which may serve as the foundation of a new loan2 and let us consider the necessary consequences of this situation4 ,though the imperfect state of our political knowledge and the narrow capacities of men make it difficult to foretell the effects which will result from any untried measure1 the seeds of ruin are here scattered with such profusion as not to escape the eye of the most careless observer4 ,in this unnatural state of society1 the only persons who possess any revenue beyond the immediate effects of their industry are the stockholders1 who draw almost all the rent of the land and houses1 besides the produce of all the customs and excises4 ,these are men who have no connections in the state1 who can enjoy their revenue in any part of the world in which they choose to reside1 who will naturally bury themselves in the capital1 or in great cities1 and who will sink into the lethargy of a stupid and pampered luxury1 without spirit1 ambition1 or enjoyment4 ,adieu to all ideas of nobility1 gentry1 and family4 ,the stocks can be transferred in an instant1 and being in such a fluctuating state1 will seldom be transmitted during three generations from father to son4 ,or were they to remain ever so long in one family1 they convey no hereditary authority or credit to the possessors2 and by this means1 the several ranks of men1 which form a kind of independent magistracy in a state1 instituted by the hand of nature1 are entirely lost1 and every man in authority derives his influence from the commission alone of the sovereign4 ,no expedient remains for preventing or suppressing insurrections but mercenary armies2 no expedient at all remains for resisting tyranny2 elections are swayed by bribery and corruption alone2 and the middle power between king and people being totally removed1 a horrible despotism must infallibly prevail4 ,the landholders1 despised for their poverty and hated for their oppressions1 will be utterly unable to make any opposition to it4 ,though a resolution should be formed by the legislature never to impose any tax which hurts commerce and discourages industry1 it will be impossible for men1 in subjects of such extreme delicacy1 to reason so justly as never to be mistaken1 or amidst difficulties so urgent1 never to be seduced from their resolution4 ,the continual fluctuations in commerce require continual alterations in the nature of the taxes1 which exposes the legislature every moment to the danger both of wilful and involuntary error2 and any great blow given to trade1 whether by injudicious taxes or by other accidents1 throws the whole system of the government into confusion4 ,but what expedient is the public now to fall upon1 even supposing trade to continue in the most flourishing condition1 to support its foreign wars and enterprises1 and to defend its own honour and interests or those of its allies8 ,i do not ask how the public is to exert such a prodigious power as it has maintained during our late wars1 where we have so much exceeded1 not only our own natural strength1 but even that of the greatest empires4 ,this extravagance is the abuse complained of1 as the source of all the dangers to which we are at present exposed4 ,but since we must still suppose great commerce and opulence to remain even after every fund is mortgaged1 those riches must be defended by proportionable power1 and whence is the public to derive the revenue which supports it8 ,it must plainly be from a continual taxation of the annuitants1 or1 which is the same thing1 from mortgaging anew on every exigency a certain part of their annuity1 and thus making them contribute to their own defence and to that of the nation2 but the difficulties attending this system of policy will easily appear1 whether we suppose the king to have become absolute master or to be still controlled by national councils1 in which the annuitants themselves must necessarily bear the principal sway4 ,if the prince has become absolute1 as may naturally be expected from this situation of affairs1 it is so easy for him to increase his exactions upon the annuitants1 which amount only to the retaining money in his own hands1 that this species of property will soon lose all its credit1 and the whole income of every individual in the state must lie entirely at the mercy of the sovereign--a degree of despotism which no oriental monarchy has ever yet attained4 ,if1 on the contrary1 the consent of the annuitants be requisite for every taxation1 they will never be persuaded to contribute sufficiently even to the support of government1 as the diminution of their revenue must in that case be very sensible1 would not be disguised under the appearance of a branch of excise or customs1 and would not be shared by any other order of the state1 who are already supposed to be taxed to the utmost4 ,there are instances in some republics of a hundredth penny1 and sometimes of the fiftieth1 being given to the support of the state2 but this is always an extraordinary exertion of power1 and can never become the foundation of a constant national defence4 ,we have always found1 where a government has mortgaged all its revenues1 that it necessarily sinks into a state of languor1 inactivity1 and impotence4 ,such are the inconveniences which may reasonably be foreseen of this situation to which ,great ,britain is visibly tending1 not to mention the numberless inconveniences which cannot be foreseen1 and which must result from so monstrous a situation as that of making the public the sole proprietor of land1 besides investing it with every branch of customs and excise which the fertile imagination of ministers and projectors have been able to invent4 ,i must confess that there is a strange supineness1 from long custom1 crept into all ranks of men with regard to public debts1 not unlike what divines so vehemently complain of with regard to their religious doctrines4 ,we all own that the most sanguine imagination cannot hope either that this or any future ministry will be possessed of such rigid and steady frugality as to make any considerable progress in the payment of our debts1 or that the situation of foreign affairs will1 for any long time1 allow them leisure and tranquillity for such an undertaking4#cj ,what then is to become of us8 ,were we ever so good ,christians and ever so resigned to ,providence1 this1 methinks1 were a curious question1 even considered as a speculative one1 and what it might not be altogether impossible to form some conjectural solution of4 ,the events here will depend little upon the contingencies of battles1 negotiations1 intrigues1 and factions4 ,there seems to be a natural progress of things which may guide our reasoning4 ,as it would have required but a moderate share of prudence when we first began this practice of mortgaging to have foretold1 from the nature of men and of ministers1 that things would necessarily be carried to the length we see1 so now that they have at last happily reached it1 it may not be difficult to guess at the consequences4 ,it must1 indeed1 be one of these two events--either the nation must destroy public credit1 or public credit will destroy the nation4 ,it is impossible they can both subsist after the manner they have been hitherto managed1 in this as well as in some other nations4 ,there was indeed a scheme for the payment of our debts which was proposed by an excellent citizen1 ,mr4 ,hutchinson1 above thirty years ago1 and which was much approved of by some men of sense1 but never was likely to take effect4 ,he asserted that there was a fallacy in imagining that the public owed this debt1 for that really every individual owed a proportional share of it1 and paid1 in his taxes1 a proportional share of the interest1 beside the expenses of levying these taxes4 ,had we not better1 then1 says he1 make a proportional distribution of the debt among us1 and each of us contribute a sum suitable to his property1 and by that means discharge at once all our funds and public mortgages8 ,he seems not to have considered that the laborious poor pay a considerable part of the taxes by their annual consumptions1 though they could not advance at once a proportional part of the sum required2 not to mention that property in money and stock in trade might easily be concealed or disguised1 and that visible property in lands and houses would really at last answer for the whole--an inequality and oppression which never would be submitted to4 ,but though this project is never likely to take place1 it is not altogether improbable that when the nation become heartily sick of their debts1 and are cruelly oppressed by them1 some daring projector may arise with visionary schemes for their discharge4 ,and as public credit will begin1 by that time1 to be a little frail1 the least touch will destroy it1 as happened in ,france2 and in this manner it will die of the doctor4#ca ,but it is more probable that the breach of national faith will be the necessary effect of wars1 defeats1 misfortunes1 and public calamities1 or even perhaps of victories and conquests4 ,i must confess1 when ,i see princes and states fighting and quarrelling1 amidst their debts1 funds1 and public mortgages1 it always brings to my mind a match of cudgel-playing fought in a china-shop4 ,how can it be expected that sovereigns will spare a species of property which is pernicious to themselves and to the public1 when they have so little compassion on lives and properties which are useful to both8 ,let the time come 7and surely it will come7 when the new funds created for the exigencies of the year are not subscribed to1 and raise not the money projected4 ,suppose either that the cash of the nation is exhausted1 or that our faith1 which has hitherto been so ample1 begins to fail us2 suppose that in this distress the nation is threatened with an invasion2 a rebellion is suspected or broken out at home2 a squadron cannot be equipped for want of pay1 victuals1 or repairs2 or even a foreign subsidy cannot be advanced--what must a prince or minister do in such an emergence8 ,the right of self-preservation is unalienable in every individual1 much more in every community2 and the folly of our statesmen must then be greater than the folly of those who first contracted debt1 or1 what is more1 than that of those who trusted1 or continue to trust this security1 if these statesmen have the means of safety in their hands and do not employ them4 ,the funds1 created and mortgaged1 will by that time bring in a large yearly revenue1 sufficient for the defence and security of the nation4 ,money is perhaps lying in the exchequer1 ready for the discharge of the quarterly interest4 ,necessity calls1 fear urges1 reason exhorts1 compassion alone exclaims2 the money will immediately be seized for the current service--under the most solemn protestations1 perhaps1 of being immediately replaced4 ,but no more is requisite2 the whole fabric1 already tottering1 falls to the ground1 and buries thousands in its ruins4 ,and this1 ,i think1 may be called the natural death of public credit2 for to this period it tends as naturally as an animal body to its dissolution and destruction4#cb ,these two events supposed above are calamitous1 but not the most calamitous4 ,thousands are hereby sacrificed to the safety of millions2 but we are not without danger that the contrary event may take place1 and that millions may be sacrificed for ever to the temporary safety of thousands4#cc ,our popular government perhaps will render it difficult or dangerous for a minister to venture on so desperate an expedient as that of a voluntary bankruptcy2 and though the ,house of ,lords be altogether composed of the proprietors of lands1 and the ,house of ,commons chiefly1 and consequently neither of them can be supposed to have great property in the funds1 yet the connections of the members may be so great with the proprietors as to render them more tenacious of public faith than prudence1 policy1 or even justice1 strictly speaking1 requires4 ,and perhaps1 too1 our foreign enemies1 or rather enemy 7for we have but one to dread7 may be so politic as to discover that our safety lies in despair1 and may not therefore show the danger open and barefaced till it be inevitable4 ,the balance of power in ,europe1 our grandfathers1 our fathers1 and we1 have all justly esteemed too unequal to be preserved without our attention and assistance4 ,but our children1 weary with the struggle1 and fettered with encumbrances1 may sit down secure and see their neighbours oppressed and conquered1 till at last they themselves and their creditors lie both at the mercy of the conqueror4 ,and this may properly enough be denominated the violent death of our public credit4 ,these seem to be the events which are not very remote1 and which reason foresees as clearly almost as she can do anything that lies in the womb of time4 ,and though the ancients maintained that1 in order to reach the gift of prophecy1 a certain divine fury or madness was requisite1 one may safely affirm that1 in order to deliver such prophecies as these1 no more is necessary than merely to be in one's senses1 free from the influence of popular madness and delusion4 ,,notes1 ,,of ,,public ,,credit4 #bg ,essay ,of the ,balance of ,trade4 #bh ,plut4 in ,vita ,alex4 ,he makes these treasures amount to #hj1jjj talents1 or about #ae millions sterling4 ,quintus ,curtius 7lib4 #e1 cap4 #b7 says that ,alexander found in ,susa above #ej1jjj talents4 #bi ,melon1 ,du ,tot1 ,law1 in the pamphlets published in ,france4 #cj ,in times of peace and security1 when alone it is possible to pay debt1 the moneyed interest are averse to receive partial payments1 which they know not how to dispose of to advantage1 and the landed interest are averse to continue the taxes requisite for that purpose4 ,why therefore should a minister persevere in a measure so disagreeable to all parties8 ,for the sake1 ,i suppose1 of a posterity which he will never see1 or of a few reasonable1 reflecting people whose united interest perhaps will not be able to secure him the smallest borough in ,england4 ,it is not likely we shall ever find any minister so bad a politician4 ,with regard to these narrow1 destructive maxims of politics all ministers are expert enough4 #ca ,some neighbouring states practise an easy expedient1 by which they lighten their public debts4 ,the ,french have a custom 7as the ,romans formerly had7 of augmenting their money1 and this the nation has been so much familiarized to that it hurts not public credit1 though it be really cutting off at once1 by an edict1 so much of their debts4 ,the ,dutch diminish the interest without the consent of their creditors2 or1 which is the same thing1 they arbitrarily tax the funds as well as other property4 ,could we practise either of these methods1 we need never be oppressed by the national debt2 and it is not impossible but one of these1 or some other method1 may1 at all adventures1 be tried1 on the augmentation of our encumbrances and difficulties4 ,but people in this country are so good reasoners upon whatever regards their interest1 that such a practice will deceive nobody1 and public credit will probably tumble at once by so dangerous a trial4 #cb ,so great dupes are the generality of mankind1 that notwithstanding such a violent shock to public credit as a voluntary bankruptcy in ,england would occasion1 it would not probably be long ere credit would again revive in as flourishing a condition as before4 ,the present ,king of ,france1 during the late war1 borrowed money at lower interest than ever his grandfather did1 and as low as the ,british ,parliament1 comparing the natural rate of interest in both kingdoms4 ,and though men are commonly more governed by what they have seen than by what they foresee1 with whatever certainty1 yet promises1 protestations1 fair appearances1 with the allurements of present interest1 have such powerful influence as few are able to resist4 ,mankind are1 in all ages1 caught by the same baits4 ,the same tricks1 played over and over again1 still trepan them4 ,the heights of popularity and patriotism are still the beaten road to power and tyranny2 flattery to treachery2 standing armies to arbitrary government2 and the glory of ,god to the temporal interest of the clergy4 ,the fear of an everlasting destruction of credit1 allowing it to be an evil1 is a needless bugbear4 ,a prudent man1 in reality1 would rather lend to the public immediately after they had taken a sponge to their debts1 than at present2 as much as an opulent knave1 even though one could not force him to pay1 is a preferable debtor to an honest bankrupt2 for the former1 in order to carry on business1 may find it his interest to discharge his debts1 where they are not exorbitant4 ,the latter has it not in his power4 ,the reasoning of ,tacitus 7,hist4 lib4 #c71 as it is eternally true1 is very applicable to our present case3 8,sed vulgus ad magnitudinem beneficiorum aderat3 ,stultissimus quisque pecuniis mercabatur3 ,apud sapientes cassa habebantur1 qu neque dari neque accipi1 salva republica1 poterant40 ,the public is a debtor1 whom no man can oblige to pay4 ,the only check which the creditors have on it is the interest of preserving credit2 an interest which may easily be overbalanced by a very great debt1 and by a difficult and extraordinary emergence1 even supposing that credit irrecoverable4 ,not to mention that a present necessity often forces states into measures which are1 strictly speaking1 against their interest4 #cc ,i have heard it has been computed that all the creditors of the public1 natives and foreigners1 amount only to #ag1jjj4 ,these make a figure at present on their income2 but in case of a public bankruptcy would in an instant become the lowest1 as well as the most wretched of the people4 ,the dignity and authority of the landed gentry and nobility is much better rooted1 and would render the contention very unequal1 if ever we come to that extremity4 ,one would incline to assign to this event a very near period1 such as half a century1 had not our fathers' prophecies of this kind been already found fallacious by the duration of our public credit so much beyond all reasonable expectation4 ,when the astrologers in ,france were every year foretelling the death of ,henry ,,iv41 8,these fellows10 says he1 8must be right at last40 ,we shall therefore be more cautious than to assign any precise date1 and shall content ourselves with pointing out the event in general4 ,,of ,,some ,,remarkable ,,customs4 ,i shall observe three remarkable customs in three celebrated governments1 and shall conclude from the whole that all general maxims in politics ought to be established with great reserve1 and that irregular and extraordinary appearances are frequently discovered in the moral as well as in the physical world4 ,the former perhaps can we better account for after they happen1 from springs and principles of which every one has within himself1 or from obvious observation1 the strongest assurance and conviction2 but it is often fully as impossible for human prudence beforehand to foresee and foretell them4 ,i4 ,one would think it essential to every supreme council or assembly which debates1 that entire liberty of speech should be granted to every member1 and that all motions or reasonings should be received which can any way tend to illustrate the point under deliberation4 ,one would conclude1 with still greater assurance1 that after a motion was made1 which was voted and approved by that assembly in which the legislative power is lodged1 the member who made the motion must for ever be exempted from further trial or inquiry4 ,but no political maxim can at first sight appear more undisputable than that he must at least be secured from all inferior jurisdiction1 and that nothing less than the same supreme legislative assembly1 in their subsequent meetings1 could render him accountable for those motions and harangues which they had before approved of4 ,but these axioms1 however irrefragable they may appear1 have all failed in the ,athenian government1 from causes1 and principles too1 which appear almost inevitable4 ,by the 1 or 8indictment of illegality0 7though it has not been remarked by antiquaries or commentators71 any man was tried and punished by any common court of judicature for any law which had passed upon his motion in the assembly of the people1 if that law appeared to the court unjust or prejudicial to the public4 ,thus ,demosthenes1 finding that ship-money was levied irregularly1 and that the poor bore the same burden as the rich in equipping the galleys1 corrected this inequality by a very useful law1 which proportioned the expense to the revenue and income of each individual4 ,he moved for this law in the assembly1 he proved its advantages1#cd he convinced the people1 the only legislature in ,athens1 the law passed and was carried into execution2 and yet he was tried in a criminal court for that law upon the complaint of the rich1 who resented the alteration he had introduced into the finances4 ,he was indeed acquitted upon proving anew the usefulness of his law4 ,ctesiphon moved in the assembly of the people that particular honours should be conferred on ,demosthenes1 as on a citizen affectionate and useful to the commonwealth4 ,the people1 convinced of this truth1 voted those honours2 yet was ,ctesiphon tried by the 4 ,it was asserted1 among other topics1 that ,demosthenes was not a good citizen1 nor affectionate to the commonwealth1 and the orator was called upon to defend his friend1 and consequently himself1 which he executed by that sublime piece of eloquence that has ever since been the admiration of mankind4 ,after the battle of ,chronea a law was passed1 upon the motion of ,hyperides1 giving liberty to slaves and enrolling them in the troops4#ce ,on account of this law the orator was afterwards tried by the indictment above mentioned1 and defended himself1 among other topics1 by that stroke celebrated by ,plutarch and ,longinus4 8,it was not ,i10 said he1 8that moved for this law3 it was the necessities of war2 it was the battle of ,chronea40 ,the orations of ,demosthenes abound with many instances of trials of this nature1 and prove clearly that nothing was more commonly practised4 ,the ,athenian ,democracy was such a tumultuary government as we can scarce form a notion of in the present age of the world4 ,the whole collective body of the people voted in every law without any limitation of property1 without any distinction of rank1 without control of any magistracy or senate2#cf and consequently without regard to order1 justice1 or prudence4 ,the ,athenians soon became sensible of the mischiefs attending this constitution1 but being averse to the checking themselves by any rule or restriction1 they resolved at least to check their demagogues or counsellors by the fear of future punishment and inquiry4 ,they accordingly instituted this remarkable law1 a law esteemed so essential to their government that schines insists on it as a known truth1 that were it abolished or neglected it were impossible for the ,democracy to subsist4#cg ,the people feared not any ill consequence to liberty from the authority of the criminal courts1 because these were nothing but very numerous juries1 chosen by lot from among the people2 and they considered themselves justly as in a state of perpetual pupilage1 where they had an authority1 after they came to the use of reason1 not only to retract and control whatever had been determined1 but to punish any guardian for measures which they had embraced by his persuasion4 ,the same law had place in ,thebes1 and for the same reason4 ,it appears to have been a usual practice in ,athens1 on the establishment of any law esteemed very useful or popular1 to prohibit for ever its abrogation and repeal4 ,thus the demagogue who diverted all the public revenues to the support of shows and spectacles1 made it criminal so much as to move for a repeal of this law2 thus ,leptines moved for a law1 not only to recall all the immunities formerly granted1 but to deprive the people for the future of the power of granting any more2 thus all bills of attainder were forbid1 or laws that affected one ,athenian without extending to the whole commonwealth4 ,these absurd clauses1 by which the legislature vainly attempted to bind itself for ever1 proceeded from a universal sense of the levity and inconstancy of the people4 ,,ii4 ,a wheel within a wheel1 such as we observe in the ,german ,empire1 is considered by ,lord ,shaftesbury#ch as an absurdity in politics2 but what must we say to two equal wheels which govern the same political machine without any mutual check1 control1 or subordination1 and yet preserve the greatest harmony and concord8 ,to establish two distinct legislatures1 each of which possesses full and absolute authority within itself1 and stands in no need of the other's assistance1 in order to give validity to its acts1 this may appear beforehand altogether impracticable as long as men are actuated by the passions of ambition1 emulation1 and avarice1 which have been hitherto their chief governing principles4 ,and should ,i assert that the state ,i have in my eye was divided into two distinct factions1 each of which predominated in a distinct legislature1 and yet produced no clashing in these independent powers1 the supposition may appear almost incredible2 and if1 to augment the paradox1 ,i should affirm that this disjointed1 irregular government was the most active1 triumphant1 and illustrious commonwealth that ever yet appeared on the stage of the world1 ,i should certainly be told that such a political chimera was as absurd as any vision of the poets4 ,but there is no need for searching long in order to prove the reality of the foregoing suppositions1 for this was actually the case with the ,roman republic4 ,the legislative power was there lodged in the comitia centuriata and comitia tributa4 ,in the former1 it is well known1 the people voted according to their census2 so that when the first class was unanimous1 though it contained not perhaps the hundredth part of the commonwealth1 it determined the whole1 and1 with the authority of the senate1 established a law4 ,in the latter1 every vote was alike2 and as the authority of the senate was not there requisite1 the lower people entirely prevailed and gave law to the whole state4 ,in all party divisions1 at first between the ,patricians and ,plebeians1 afterwards between the nobles and the people1 the interest of the aristocracy was predominant in the first legislature1 that of the democracy in the second4 ,the one could always destroy what the other had established2 nay1 the one by a sudden and unforeseen motion might take the start of the other and totally annihilate its rival by a vote1 which1 from the nature of the constitution1 had the full authority of a law4 ,but no such contest or struggle is observed in the history of ,rome3 no instance of a quarrel between these two legislatures1 though many between the parties that governed in each4 ,whence arose this concord1 which may seem so extraordinary8 ,the legislature established at ,rome by the authority of ,servius ,tullius was the comitia centuriata1 which1 after the expulsion of the kings1 rendered the government for some time altogether aristocratical4 ,but the people1 having numbers and force on their side1 and being elated with frequent conquests and victories in their foreign wars1 always prevailed when pushed to extremities1 and first extorted from the senate the magistracy of the tribunes1 and then the legislative power of the comitia tributa4 ,it then behoved the nobles to be more careful than ever not to provoke the people1 for beside the force which the latter were always possessed of1 they had now got possession of legal authority1 and could instantly break in pieces any order or institution which directly opposed them4 ,by intrigue1 by influence1 by money1 by combination1 and by the respect paid their character1 the nobles might often prevail and direct the whole machine of government2 but had they openly set their comitia centuriata in opposition to the tributa1 they had soon lost the advantage of that institution1 together with their consuls1 prtors1 ediles1 and all the magistrates elected by it4 ,but the comitia tributa1 not having the same reason for respecting the centuriata1 frequently repealed laws favourable to the aristocracy2 they limited the authority of the nobles1 protected the people from oppression1 and controlled the actions of the senate and magistracy4 ,the centuriata found it convenient always to submit2 and though equal in authority1 yet being inferior in power1 durst never directly give any shock to the other legislature1 either by repealing its laws or establishing laws1 which1 it foresaw1 would soon be repealed by it4 ,no instance is found of any opposition or struggle between these comitia1 except one slight attempt of this kind mentioned by ,appian in the third book of his ,civil ,wars4 ,mark ,antony1 resolving to deprive ,decimus ,brutus of the government of ,cisalpine ,gaul1 railed in the forum1 and called one of the comitia in order to prevent the meeting of the other which had been ordered by the senate2 but affairs were then fallen into such confusion1 and the ,roman constitution was so near its final dissolution1 that no inference can be drawn from such an expedient4 ,this contest1 besides1 was founded more on form than party4 ,it was the senate who ordered the comitia tributa that they might obstruct the meeting of the centuriata1 which1 by the constitution1 or at least forms of the government1 could alone dispose of provinces4 ,cicero was recalled by the comitia centuriata1 though banished by the tributa--that is1 by a plebiscitum4 ,but his banishment1 we may observe1 never was considered as a legal deed1 arising from the free choice and inclination of the people4 ,it was always ascribed to the violence alone of ,clodius1 and to the disorders introduced by him into the government4 ,,iii4 ,the third custom which we proposed to observe regards ,england1 and though it be not so important as those which we have pointed out in ,athens and ,rome1 it is no less singular and remarkable4 ,it is a maxim in politics which we readily admit as undisputed and universal1 that a power1 however great1 when granted by law to an eminent magistrate is not so dangerous to liberty as an authority1 however considerable1 which he acquires from violence and usurpation2 for1 besides that the law always limits every power which it bestows1 the very receiving it as a concession establishes the authority whence it is derived and preserves the harmony of the constitution4 ,by the same right that one prerogative is assumed without law another may also be claimed1 and another with still greater facility2 while the first usurpations both serve as precedents to the following1 and give force to maintain them4 ,hence the heroism of ,hampden1 who sustained the whole violence of royal prosecution rather than pay a tax of twenty shillings not imposed by ,parliament2 hence the care of all ,english patriots to guard against the first encroachments of the crown1 and hence alone the existence at this day of ,english liberty4 ,there is1 however1 one occasion where the ,parliament has departed from this maxim1 and this is in the pressing of seamen4 ,the exercise of an illegal power is here tacitly permitted in the crown1 and though it has frequently been under deliberation how that power might be rendered legal and granted under proper restrictions to the sovereign1 no safe expedient could ever be proposed for that purpose1 and the danger to liberty always appeared greater from law than from usurpation4 ,while this power is exercised to no other end than to man the ,navy men willingly submit to it from a sense of its use and necessity1 and the sailors1 who are alone affected by it1 find nobody to support them in claiming the rights and privileges which the law grants without distinction to all ,english subjects4 ,but were this power on any occasion made an instrument of faction or ministerial tyranny1 the opposite faction1 and indeed all lovers of their country1 would immediately take the alarm and support the injured party4 ,the liberty of ,englishmen would be asserted2 juries would be implacable2 and the tools of tyranny acting both against law and equity would meet with the severest vengeance4 ,on the other hand1 were the ,parliament to grant such an authority1 they would probably fall into one of these two inconveniences3 they would either bestow it under so many restrictions as would make it lose its effects by cramping the authority of the crown1 or they would render it so large and comprehensive as might give occasion to great abuses1 for which we could in that case have no remedy4 ,the very illegality of the power at present prevents its abuses1 by affording so easy a remedy against them4 ,i pretend not by this reasoning to exclude all possibility of contriving a register for seamen1 which might man the ,navy without being dangerous to liberty4 ,i only observe that no satisfactory scheme of that nature has yet been proposed4 ,rather than adopt any project hitherto invented1 we continue a practice seemingly the most absurd and unaccountable4 ,authority1 in times of full internal peace and concord1 is armed against law4 ,a continued and open usurpation of the crown is permitted amidst the greatest jealousy and watchfulness in the people2 nay1 proceeding from those very principles1 liberty1 in a country of the highest liberty1 is left entirely to its own defence without any countenance or protection2 the wild state of nature is renewed in one of the most civilized societies of mankind2 and great violences and disorders among the people1 the most human and the best-natured1 are committed with impunity2 while the one party pleads obedience to the supreme magistrate1 the other the sanction of fundamental laws4 ,,notes1 ,,of ,,some ,,remarkable ,,customs4 #cd ,his harangue for it is still extant3 4 #ce ,plutarchus in vita decem oratorum4 ,demosthenes gives a different account of this law4 7,contra ,aristogiton1 ,orat4 ,,ii47 ,he says that its purport was to render the 1 or to restore the privilege of bearing offices to those who had been declared incapable4 ,perhaps these were both clauses of the same law4 #cf ,the senate of the ,bean was only a less numerous mob chosen by lot from among the people1 and their authority was not great4 #cg ,in ,ctesiphontem4 ,it is remarkable that the first step after the dissolution of the ,democracy by ,critias and the ,thirty was to annul the 1 as we learn from ,demosthenes 4 ,the orator in this oration gives us the words of the law establishing the 1 p4 #big1 ex edit4 ,aldi4 ,and he accounts for it from the same principles we here reason upon4 #ch ,essay on the ,freedom of ,wit and ,humour1 part #c1 #b4 ,,of ,,the ,,populousness ,,of ,,ancient ,,nations4#ci ,there is very little ground1 either from reason or experience1 to conclude the universe eternal or incorruptible4 ,the continual and rapid motion of matter1 the violent revolutions with which every part is agitated1 the changes remarked in the heavens1 the plain traces as well as tradition of a universal deluge1--all these prove strongly the mortality of this fabric of the world1 and its passage1 by corruption or dissolution1 from one state or order to another4 ,it must therefore1 as well as each individual form which it contains1 have its infancy1 youth1 manhood1 and old age2 and it is probable that in all these variations man1 equally with every animal and vegetable1 will partake4 ,in the flourishing age of the world it may be expected that the human species should possess greater vigour both of mind and body1 more prosperous health1 higher spirits1 longer life1 and a stronger inclination and power of generation4 ,but if the general system of things1 and human society of course1 have any such gradual revolutions1 they are too slow to be discernible in that short period which is comprehended by history and tradition4 ,stature and force of body1 length of life1 even courage and extent of genius1 seem hitherto to have been naturally in all ages pretty much the same4 ,the arts and sciences1 indeed1 have flourished in one period and have decayed in another2 but we may observe that at the time when they rose to greatest perfection among one people they were perhaps totally unknown to all the neighbouring nations1 and though they universally decayed in one age1 yet in a succeeding generation they again revived and diffused themselves over the world4 ,as far1 therefore1 as observation reaches there is no universal difference discernible in the human species1 and though it were allowed that the universe1 like an animal body1 had a natural progress from infancy to old age2 yet1 as it must still be uncertain whether at present it be advancing to its point of perfection or declining from it1 we cannot thence presuppose any decay in human nature4#dj ,to prove1 therefore1 or account for the greater populousness of antiquity by the imaginary youth or vigour of the world will scarcely be admitted by any just reasoner2 these general physical causes ought entirely to be excluded from that question4 ,there are indeed some more particular physical causes of great importance4 ,diseases are mentioned in antiquity which are almost unknown to modern medicine1 and new diseases have arisen and propagated themselves of which there are no traces in ancient history4 ,and in this particular we may observe1 upon comparison1 that the disadvantage is very much on the side of the moderns4 ,not to mention some others of less importance1 the smallpox commits such ravages as would almost alone account for the great superiority ascribed to ancient times4 ,the tenth or the twelfth part of mankind destroyed every generation should make a vast difference1 it may be thought1 in the numbers of the people2 and when joined to venereal distempers1 a new plague diffused everywhere1 this disease is perhaps equivalent1 by its constant operation1 to the three great scourges of mankind--war1 pestilence1 and famine4 ,were it certain1 therefore1 that ancient times were more populous than the present1 and could no moral causes be assigned for so great a change1 these physical causes alone1 in the opinion of many1 would be sufficient to give us satisfaction on that head4 ,but is it certain that antiquity was so much more populous as is pretended8 ,the extravagancies of ,vossius with regard to this subject are well known2 but an author of much greater genius and discernment has ventured to affirm that1 according to the best computations which these subjects will admit of1 there are not now on the face of the earth the fiftieth part of mankind which existed in the time of ,julius ,csar4 ,it may easily be observed that the comparisons in this case must be very imperfect1 even though we confine ourselves to the scene of ancient history--,europe and the nations about the ,mediterranean4 ,we know not exactly the numbers of any ,european kingdom1 or even city1 at present2 how can we pretend to calculate those of ancient cities and states where historians have left us such imperfect traces8 ,for my part1 the matter appears to me so uncertain that1 as ,i intend to throw together some reflections on that head1 ,i shall intermingle the inquiry concerning causes with that concerning facts1 which ought never to be admitted where the facts can be ascertained with any tolerable assurance4 ,we shall first consider whether it be probable1 from what we know of the situation of society in both periods1 that antiquity must have been more populous2 secondly1 whether in reality it was so4 ,if ,i can make it appear that the conclusion is not so certain as is pretended in favour of antiquity1 it is all ,i aspire to4 ,in general we may observe that the question with regard to the comparative populousness of ages or kingdoms implies very important consequences1 and commonly determines concerning the preference of their whole police1 their manners1 and the constitution of their government4 ,for as there is in all men1 both male and female1 a desire and power of generation more active than is ever universally exerted1 the restraints which they lie under must proceed from some difficulties in their situation1 which it belongs to a wise legislature carefully to observe and remove4 ,almost every man who thinks he can maintain a family will have one1 and the human species at this rate of propagation would more than double every generation4 ,how fast do mankind multiply in every colony or new settlement1 where it is an easy matter to provide for a family1 and where men are nowise straightened or confined as in long established governments8 ,history tells us frequently of plagues which have swept away the third or fourth part of a people2 yet in a generation or two the destruction was not perceived1 and the society had again acquired their former number4 ,the lands which were cultivated1 the houses built1 the commodities raised1 the riches acquired1 enabled the people who escaped immediately to marry and to rear families1 which supplied the place of those who had perished4#da ,and for a like reason every wise1 just1 and mild government1 by rendering the condition of its subjects easy and secure1 will always abound most in people1 as well as in commodities and riches4 ,a country1 indeed1 whose climate and soil are fitted for vines will naturally be more populous than one which is only fitted for pasturage2 but if everything else be equal1 it seems natural to expect that wherever there are most happiness and virtue and the wisest institutions1 there will also be most people4 ,the question1 therefore1 concerning the populousness of ancient and modern times being allowed of great importance1 it will be requisite1 if we would bring it to some determination1 to compare both the domestic and political situation of these two periods1 in order to judge of the facts by their moral causes1 which is the first view in which we proposed to consider them4 ,the chief difference between the domestic economy of the ancients and that of the moderns consists in the practice of slavery which prevailed among the former1 and which has been abolished for some centuries throughout the greater part of ,europe4 ,some passionate admirers of the ancients and zealous partisans of civil liberty 7for these sentiments1 as they are both of them in the main extremely just1 are found to be almost inseparable7 cannot forbear regretting the loss of this institution2 and whilst they brand all submission to the government of a single person with the harsh denomination of slavery1 they would gladly reduce the greatest part of mankind to real slavery and subjection4 ,but to one who considers coolly on the subject it will appear that human nature in general really enjoys more liberty at present1 in the most arbitrary governments of ,europe1 than it ever did during the most flourishing period of ancient times4 ,as much as submission to a petty prince1 whose dominions extend not beyond a single city1 is more grievous than obedience to a great monarch1 so much is domestic slavery more cruel and oppressive than any civil subjection whatsoever4 ,the more the master is removed from us in place and rank the greater liberty we enjoy1 the less are our actions inspected and controlled1 and the fainter that cruel comparison becomes between our own subjection and the freedom and even dominion of another4 ,the remains that are found of slavery in the ,american colonies and among some ,european nations would never surely create a desire of rendering it more universal4 ,the little humanity commonly observed in persons accustomed from their infancy to exercise so great authority over their fellow-creatures and to trample upon human nature were sufficient alone to disgust us with that authority4 ,nor can a more probable reason be given for the severe1 ,i might say barbarous manners of ancient times1 than the practice of domestic slavery1 by which every man of rank was rendered a petty tyrant and educated amidst the flattery1 submission1 and low debasement of his slaves4 ,according to the ancient practice1 all checks were on the inferior1 to restrain him to the duty of submission2 none on the superior1 to engage him to the reciprocal duties of gentleness and humanity4 ,in modern times a bad servant finds not easily a good master1 nor a bad master a good servant1 and the checks are mutual1 suitable to the inviolable and eternal laws of reason and equity4 ,the custom of exposing old1 useless1 or sick slaves in an island of the ,tiber1 there to starve1 seems to have been pretty common in ,rome1 and whoever recovered after having been so exposed had his liberty given him by an edict of the ,emperor ,claudius1 where it was likewise forbid to kill any slave merely for old age or sickness4 ,but supposing that this edict was strictly obeyed1 would it better the domestic treatment of slaves or render their lives much more comfortable8 ,we may imagine what others would practise when it was the professed maxim of the elder ,cato to sell his superannuated slaves for any price rather than maintain what he esteemed a useless burden4 ,the ergastula1 or dungeons1 where slaves in chains were forced to work1 were very common all over ,italy4 ,columella advises that they be always built under ground1 and recommends it as the duty of a careful overseer to call over every day the names of these slaves1 like the mustering of a regiment or ship's company1 in order to know presently when any of them had deserted4 ,a proof of the frequency of these ergastula and of the great number of slaves usually confined in them4 ,a chained slave for a porter was usual in ,rome1 as appears from ,ovid and other authors4 ,had not these people shaken off all sense of compassion towards that unhappy part of their species1 would they have presented all their friends at the first entrance with such an image of the severity of the master and misery of the slave8 ,nothing so common in all trials1 even of civil causes1 as to call for the evidence of slaves1 which was always extorted by the most exquisite torments4 ,demosthenes says that where it was possible to produce for the same fact either freemen or slaves as witnesses1 the judges always preferred the torturing of slaves as a more certain and infallible evidence4#db ,seneca draws a picture of that disorderly luxury which changes day into night and night into day1 and inverts every stated hour of every office in life4 ,among other circumstances1 such as displacing the meals and times of bathing1 he mentions that regularly about the third hour of the night the neighbours of one who indulges this false refinement hear the noise of whips and lashes1 and upon inquiry find that he is then taking an account of the conduct of his servants and giving them due correction and discipline4 ,this is not remarked as an instance of cruelty1 but only of disorder1 which1 even in actions the most usual and methodical1 changes the fixed hours that an established custom had assigned them4#dc ,but our present business is only to consider the influence of slavery on the populousness of a state4 ,it is pretended that in this particular the ancient practice had infinitely the advantage1 and was the chief cause of that extreme populousness which is supposed in those times4 ,at present all masters discourage the marrying of their male servants1 and admit not by any means the marriage of the female1 who are then supposed altogether incapacitated for their service2 but where the property of the servants is lodged in the master1 their marriage and fertility form his riches1 and bring him a succession of slaves that supply the place of those whom age and infirmity have disabled4 ,he encourages1 therefore1 their propagation as much as that of his cattle1 rears the young with the same care1 and educates them to some art or calling1 which may render them more useful or valuable to him4 ,the opulent are1 by this policy1 interested in the being at least1 though not the well-being of the poor2 and enrich themselves by increasing the number and industry of those who are subjected to them4 ,each man1 being a sovereign in his own family1 has the same interest with regard to it as the prince with regard to the state2 and has not1 like the prince1 any opposite motive of ambition or vainglory which may lead him to depopulate his little sovereignty4 ,all of it is1 at all times1 under his eye1 and he has leisure to inspect the most minute detail of the marriage and education of his subjects4#dd ,such are the consequences of domestic slavery1 according to the first aspect and appearance of things2 but if we enter more deeply into the subject1 we shall perhaps find reason to retract our hasty determinations4 ,the comparison is shocking between the management of human creatures and that of cattle2 but being extremely just when applied to the present subject1 it may be proper to trace the consequences of it4 ,at the capital1 near all great cities1 in all populous1 rich1 industrious provinces1 few cattle are bred4 ,provisions1 lodging1 attendance1 labour are there dear1 and men find better their account in buying the cattle1 after they come to a certain age1 from the remoter and cheaper countries4 ,these are consequently the only breeding countries for cattle2 and by a parity of reason1 for men too1 when the latter are put on the same footing with the former4 ,to rear a child in ,london till he could be serviceable would cost much dearer than to buy one of the same age from ,scotland or ,ireland1 where he had been raised in a cottage1 covered with rags1 and fed on oatmeal or potatoes4 ,those who had slaves1 therefore1 in all the richer or more populous countries would discourage the pregnancy of the females1 and either prevent or destroy the birth4 ,the human species would perish in those places where it ought to increase the fastest1 and a perpetual recruit be needed from all the poorer and more desert provinces4 ,such a continued drain would tend mightily to depopulate the state1 and render great cities ten times more destructive than with us1 where every man is master of himself1 and provides for his children from the powerful instinct of nature--not the calculations of sordid interest4 ,if ,london at present1 without increasing1 needs a yearly recruit from the country of #ejjj people1 as is commonly computed1 what must it require if the greatest part of the tradesmen and common people were slaves1 and were hindered from breeding by their avaricious masters8 ,all ancient authors tell us that there was a perpetual flux of slaves to ,italy from the remoter provinces1 particularly ,syria1 ,cilicia1#de ,cappadocia1 and the ,lesser ,asia1 ,thrace1 and ,egypt2 yet the number of people did not increase in ,italy1 and writers complain of the continual decay of industry and agriculture4 ,where then is that extreme fertility of the ,roman slaves which is commonly supposed8 ,so far from multiplying1 they could not1 it seems1 so much as keep up the stock without immense recruits4 ,and though great numbers were continually manumitted and converted into ,roman citizens1 the numbers even of these did not increase till the freedom of the city was communicated to foreign provinces4 ,the term for a slave born and bred in the family was verna2#df and these slaves seem to have been entitled by custom to privileges and indulgences beyond others--a sufficient reason why the masters would not be fond of rearing many of that kind4#dg ,whoever is acquainted with the maxims of our planters will acknowledge the justness of this observation4#dh ,atticus is much praised by his historian for the care which he took in recruiting his family from the slaves born in it4#di ,may we not thence infer that that practice was not then very common8 ,the names of slaves in the ,greek comedies--,syrus1 ,mysus1 ,geta1 ,thrax1 ,davus1 ,lydus1 ,phyrx1 etc41 afford a presumption that at ,athens1 at least1 most of the slaves were imported from foreign nations4 ,the ,athenians1 says ,strabo1 gave to their slaves either the names of the nations whence they were bought1 as ,lydus1 ,syrus2 or the names that were most common among those nations1 as ,manes or ,midas to a ,phrygian1 ,tibias to a ,paphlagonian4 ,demosthenes1 after having mentioned a law which forbid any man to strike the slave of another1 praises the humanity of this law1 and adds that if the barbarians from whom slaves were bought had information that their countrymen met with such gentle treatment1 they would entertain a great esteem for the ,athenians4 ,isocrates1 too1 insinuates that the slaves of the ,greeks were generally or very commonly barbarians4 ,aristotle1 in his ,politics1 plainly supposes that a slave is always a foreigner4 ,the ancient comic writers represented the slaves as speaking a barbarous language4 ,this was an imitation of nature4 ,it is well known that ,demosthenes1 in his nonage1 had been defrauded of a large fortune by his tutors1 and that afterwards he recovered1 by a prosecution of law1 the value of his patrimony4 ,his orations on that occasion still remain1 and contain a very exact detail of the whole substance left by his father1 in money1 merchandise1 houses1 and slaves1 together with the value of each particular4 ,among the rest were #eb slaves1 handicraftsmen--viz41 #cb sword-cutlers and #bj cabinet-makers1#ej all males2 not a word of any wives1 children1 or family1 which they certainly would have had had it been a common custom at ,athens to breed from the slaves2 and the value of the whole must have depended very much on that circumstance4 ,no female slaves are even so much as mentioned1 except some housemaids who belonged to his mother4 ,this argument has great force1 if it be not altogether decisive4 ,consider this passage of ,plutarch1 speaking of the elder ,cato3--8,he had a great number of slaves1 whom he took care to buy at the sales of prisoners of war2 and he chose them young1 that they might easily be accustomed to any diet or manner of life1 and be instructed in any business or labour1 as men teach anything to young dogs or horses4 ,and esteeming love the chief source of all disorders1 he allowed the male slaves to have a commerce with the female in his family1 upon paying a certain sum for this privilege2 but he strictly forbade all intrigues out of his family40 ,are there any symptoms in this narration of that care which is supposed in the ancients1 of the marriage and propagation of their slaves8 ,if that was a common practice1 founded on general interest1 it would surely have been embraced by ,cato1 who was a great economist1 and lived in times when the ancient frugality and simplicity of manners were still in credit and reputation4 ,it is expressly remarked by the writers of the ,roman law that scarce any ever purchase slaves with a view of breeding from them4#ea ,our lackeys and housemaids1 ,i own1 do not serve much to multiply their species2 but the ancients1 besides those who attended on their person1 had all their labour performed by slaves1 who lived1 many of them1 in their family2 and some great men possessed to the number of #aj1jjj4 ,if there be any suspicion1 therefore1 that this institution was unfavourable to propagation 7and the same reason1 at least in part1 holds with regard to ancient slaves as well as modern servants71 how destructive must slavery have proved6 ,history mentions a ,roman nobleman who had #djj slaves under the same roof with him2 and having been assassinated at home by the furious revenge of one of them1 the law was executed with rigour1 and all without exception were put to death4 ,many other ,roman noblemen had families equally1 or more numerous1 and ,i believe every one will allow that this would scarcely be practicable were we to suppose all the slaves married and the females to be breeders4#eb ,so early as the poet ,hesiod married slaves1 whether male or female1 were esteemed very inconvenient4 ,how much more where families had increased to such an enormous size1 as in ,rome1 and where simplicity of manners was banished from all ranks of people8 ,xenophon in his ,economics1 where he gives directions for the management of a farm1 recommends a strict care and attention of laying the male and the female slaves at a distance from each other4 ,he seems not to suppose that they are ever married4 ,the only slaves among the ,greeks that appear to have continued their own breed were the ,helotes1 who had houses apart1 and were more the slaves of the public than of individuals4 ,the same author tells us that ,nicias's overseer1 by an agreement with his master1 was obliged to pay him an obolus a day for each slave1 besides maintaining them and keeping up the number4 ,had the ancient slaves been all breeders1 this last circumstance of the contract had been superfluous4 ,the ancients talk so frequently of a fixed1 stated portion of provisions assigned to each slave1 that we are naturally led to conclude that slaves lived almost all single1 and received that portion as a kind of board-wages4 ,the practice1 indeed1 of marrying the slaves seems not to have been very common even among the country-labourers1 where it is more naturally to be expected4 ,cato1 enumerating the slaves requisite to labour a vineyard of a hundred acres1 makes them to amount to fifteen--the overseer and his wife 7villicus and villica7 and thirteen male slaves2 for an olive plantation of #bdj acres1 the overseer and his wife and eleven male slaves2 and so in proportion to a greater or less plantation or vineyard4 ,varro1 citing this passage of ,cato1 allows his computation to be just in every respect except the last4 8,for as it is requisite10 says he1 8to have an overseer and his wife1 whether the vineyard or plantation be great or small1 this must alter the exactness of the proportion40 ,had ,cato's computation been erroneous in any other respect it had certainly been corrected by ,varro1 who seems fond of discovering so trivial an inaccuracy4 ,the same author1 as well as ,columella1 recommends it as requisite to give a wife to the overseer in order to attach him the more strongly to his master's service4 ,this was therefore a peculiar indulgence granted to a slave in whom so great a confidence was reposed4 ,in the same place ,varro mentions it as a useful precaution not to buy too many slaves from the same nations1 lest they beget factions and seditions in the family2 a presumption that in ,italy the greatest part1 even of the country-labouring slaves--for he speaks of no other--were bought from the remoter provinces4 ,all the world knows that the family-slaves in ,rome1 who were instruments of show and luxury1 were commonly imported from the east4 8,hoc profecere10 says ,pliny1 speaking of the jealous care of masters1 8mancipiorum legiones1 et in domo turba externa ac servorum quoque causa nomenclator adhibendus40 ,it is indeed recommended by ,varro to propagate young shepherds in the family from the old ones2 for as grazing farms were commonly in remote and cheap places1 and each shepherd lived in a cottage apart1 his marriage and increase were not liable to the same inconveniences as in dearer places and where many servants lived in a family1 which was universally the case in such of the ,roman farms as produced wine or corn4 ,if we consider this exception with regard to the shepherds1 and weigh the reasons of it1 it will serve for a strong confirmation of all our foregoing suspicions4 ,columella1 ,i own1 advises the master to give a reward1 and even liberty to a female slave that had reared him above three children1 a proof that sometimes the ancients propagated from their slaves1 which1 indeed1 cannot be denied4 ,were it otherwise the practice of slavery1 being so common in antiquity1 must have been destructive to a degree which no expedient could repair4 ,all ,i pretend to infer from these reasonings is that slavery is in general disadvantageous both to the happiness and populousness of mankind1 and that its place is much better supplied by the practice of hired servants4 ,the laws1 or1 as some writers call them1 the seditions of the ,gracchi1 were occasioned by their observing the increase of slaves all over ,italy1 and the diminution of free citizens4 ,appian ascribes this increase to the propagation of the slaves2 ,plutarch to the purchasing of barbarians1 who were chained and imprisoned1 4 ,it is to be presumed that both causes concurred4 ,sicily1 says ,florus1 was full of ergastula1 and was cultivated by labourers in chains4 ,eunus and ,athenio excited the servile war by breaking up these monstrous prisons and giving liberty to #fj1jjj slaves4 ,the younger ,pompey augmented his army in ,spain by the same expedient4 ,if the country-labourers throughout the ,roman ,empire were so generally in this situation1 and if it was difficult or impossible to find separate lodgings for the families of the city-servants1 how unfavourable to propagation1 as well as to humanity1 must the institution of domestic slavery be esteemed4 ,constantinople at present requires the same recruits of slaves from all the provinces which ,rome did of old1 and these provinces are of consequence far from being populous4 ,egypt1 according to ,monsieur ,maillet1 sends continual colonies of black slaves to the other parts of the ,turkish ,empire1 and receives annually an equal return of white2 the one brought from the inland parts of ,africa1 the other from ,mingrella1 ,circassia1 and ,tartary4 ,our modern convents are no doubt very bad institutions1 but there is reason to suspect that anciently every great family in ,italy1 and probably in other parts of the world1 was a species of convent4 ,and though we have reason to detest all those popish institutions as nurseries of the most abject superstition1 burdensome to the public and oppressive to the poor prisoners1 male as well as female1 yet may it be questioned whether they be so destructive to the populousness of a state as is commonly imagined4 ,were the land which belongs to a convent bestowed on a nobleman1 he would spend its revenue on dogs1 horses1 grooms1 footmen1 cooks1 and housemaids1 and his family would not furnish many more citizens than the convent4 ,the common reason why parents thrust their daughters into nunneries is that they may not be overburdened with too numerous a family2 but the ancients had a method almost as innocent and more effectual to that purpose--viz41 the exposing their children in the earliest infancy4 ,this practice was very common1 and is not mentioned by any author of those times with the horror it deserves1 or scarce#ec even with disapprobation4 ,plutarch--the humane1 good-natured ,plutarch#ed--recommends it as a virtue in ,attalus1 ,king of ,pergamus1 that he murdered1 or1 if you will1 exposed all his own children in order to leave his crown to the son of his brother1 ,eumenes1 signalising in this manner his gratitude and affection to ,eumenes1 who had left him his heir preferable to that son4 ,it was ,solon1 the most celebrated of the sages of ,greece1 who gave parents permission by law to kill their children4 ,shall we then allow these two circumstances to compensate each other--viz41 monastic vows and the exposing of children1 and to be unfavourable in equal degrees to the propagation of mankind8 ,i doubt the advantage is here on the side of antiquity4 ,perhaps1 by an odd connection of causes1 the barbarous practice of the ancients might rather render those times more populous4 ,by removing the terrors of too numerous a family it would engage many people in marriage1 and such is the force of natural affection that very few in comparison would have resolution enough to carry into execution their former intentions4 ,china1 the only country where this cruel practice of exposing children prevails at present1 is the most populous country we know1 and every man is married before he is twenty4 ,such early marriages could scarcely be general had not men the prospect of so easy a method of getting rid of their children4 ,i own that ,plutarch speaks of it as a very universal maxim of the poor to expose their children1 and as the rich were then averse to marriage on account of the courtship they met with from those who expected legacies from them1 the public must have been in a bad situation between them4#ee ,of all sciences there is none where first appearances are more deceitful than in politics4 ,hospitals for foundlings seem favourable to the increase of numbers1 and perhaps may be so when kept under proper restrictions2 but when they open the door to every one1 without distinction1 they have probably a contrary effect1 and are pernicious to the state4 ,it is computed that every ninth child born at ,paris is sent to the hospital1 though it seems certain1 according to the common course of human affairs1 that it is not a hundredth part whose parents are altogether incapacitated to rear and educate them4 ,the infinite difference1 for health1 industry1 and morals1 between an education in an hospital and that in a private family should induce us not to make the entrance into an hospital too easy and engaging4 ,to kill one's own child is shocking to nature1 and must therefore be pretty unusual2 but to turn over the care of him upon others is very tempting to the natural indolence of mankind4 ,having considered the domestic life and manners of the ancients compared to those of the moderns1 where in the main we seem rather superior so far as the present question is concerned1 we shall now examine the political customs and institutions of both ages1 and weigh their influence in retarding or forwarding the propagation of mankind4 ,before the increase of the ,roman power1 or rather till its full establishment1 almost all the nations which are the scene of ancient history were divided into small territories or petty commonwealths1 where of course a great equality of fortune prevailed1 and the centre of the government was always very near its frontiers4 ,this was the situation of affairs not only in ,greece and ,italy1 but also in ,spain1 ,gaul1 ,germany1 ,africa1 and a great part of the ,lesser ,asia4 ,and it must be owned that no institution could be more favourable to the propagation of mankind2 for though a man of an overgrown fortune1 not being able to consume more than another1 must share it with those who serve and attend him1 yet their possession being precarious1 they have not the same encouragement to marriage as if each had a small fortune secure and independent4 ,enormous cities are1 besides1 destructive to society1 beget vice and disorder of all kinds1 starve the remoter provinces1 and even starve themselves by the prices to which they raise all provisions4 ,where each man had his little house and field to himself1 and each county had its capital1 free and independent1 what a happy situation of mankind6 ,how favourable to industry and agriculture1 to marriage and propagation6 ,the prolific virtue of men1 were it to act in its full extent1 without that restraint which poverty and necessity imposes on it1 would double the number every generation2 and nothing surely can give it more liberty than such small commonwealths1 and such an equality of fortune among the citizens4 ,all small states naturally produce equality of fortune because they afford no opportunities of great increase1 but small commonwealths much more by that division of power and authority which is essential to them4 ,when ,xenophon returned after the famous expedition with ,cyrus1 he hired himself and #fjjj of the ,greeks into the service of ,seuthes1 a prince of ,thrace2 and the articles of his agreement were that each soldier should receive a daric a month1 each captain two darics1 and he himself1 as general1 four2 a regulation of pay which would not a little surprise our modern officers4 ,demosthenes and schines1 with eight more1 were sent ambassadors to ,philip of ,macedon1 and their appointments for above four months were a thousand drachmas1 which is less than a drachma a day for each ambassador4 ,but a drachma a day--nay1 sometimes two1 was the pay of a common foot-soldier4 ,a centurion among the ,romans had only double pay to a private man in ,polybius's time1 and we accordingly find the gratuities after a triumph regulated by that proportion4 ,but ,mark ,anthony and the triumvirate gave the centurions five times the reward of the other2 so much had the increase of the commonwealth increased the inequality among the citizens4#ef ,it must be owned that the situation of affairs in modern times with regard to civil liberty1 as well as equality of fortune1 is not near so favourable either to the propagation or happiness of mankind4 ,europe is shared out mostly into great monarchies1 and such parts of it as are divided into small territories are commonly governed by absolute princes1 who ruin their people by a mimicry of the greater monarchs in the splendour of their court and number of their forces4 ,switzerland alone and ,holland resemble the ancient republics1 and though the former is far from possessing any advantage either of soil1 climate1 or commerce1 yet the numbers of people with which it abounds1 notwithstanding their enlisting themselves into every service in ,europe1 prove sufficiently the advantages of their political institutions4 ,the ancient republics derived their chief or only security from the numbers of their citizens4 ,the ,trachinians having lost great numbers of their people1 the remainder1 instead of enriching themselves by the inheritance of their fellow-citizens1 applied to ,sparta1 their metropolis1 for a new stock of inhabitants4 ,the ,spartans immediately collected ten thousand men1 among whom the old citizens divided the lands of which the former proprietors had perished4 ,after ,timoleon had banished ,dionysius from ,syracuse and had settled the affairs of ,sicily1 finding the cities of ,syracuse and ,sellinuntium extremely depopulated by tyranny1 war1 and faction1 he invited over from ,greece some new inhabitants to repeople them4 ,immediately forty thousand men 7,plutarch says sixty thousand7 offered themselves1 and he distributed so many lots of land among them1 to the great satisfaction of the ancient inhabitants2 a proof at once of the maxims of ancient policy1 which affected populousness more than riches1 and of the good effects of these maxims in the extreme populousness of that small country ,greece1 which could at once supply so large a colony4 ,the case was not much different with the ,romans in early times4 8,he is a pernicious citizen10 said ,m4 ,curius1 8who cannot be contented with seven acres40#eg ,such ideas of equality could not fail of producing great numbers of people4 ,we must now consider what disadvantages the ancients lay under with regard to populousness1 and what checks they received from their political maxims and institutions4 ,there are commonly compensations in every human condition1 and though these compensations be not always perfectly equal1 yet they serve1 at least1 to restrain the prevailing principle4 ,to compare them and estimate their influence is indeed very difficult1 even where they take place in the same age1 and in neighbouring countries2 but where several ages have intervened1 and only scattered lights are afforded us by ancient authors1 what can we do but amuse ourselves by talking1 pro and con1 on an interesting subject1 and thereby correcting all hasty and violent determinations8 ,first1 we may observe that the ancient republics were almost in perpetual war1 a natural effect of their martial spirit1 their love of liberty1 their mutual emulation1 and that hatred which generally prevails among nations that live in a close neighbourhood4 ,now1 war in a small state is much more destructive than in a great one1 both because all the inhabitants in the former case must serve in the armies1 and because the state is all frontier and all exposed to the inroads of the enemy4 ,the maxims of ancient war were much more destructive than those of modern1 chiefly by the distribution of plunder1 in which the soldiers were indulged4 ,the private men in our armies are such a low set of people that we find any abundance beyond their simple pay breeds confusion and disorder1 and a total dissolution of discipline4 ,the very wretchedness and meanness of those who fill the modern armies render them less destructive to the countries which they invade2 one instance1 among many1 of the deceitfulness of first appearances in all political reasonings4#eh ,ancient battles were much more bloody by the very nature of the weapons employed in them4 ,the ancients drew up their men sixteen or twenty1 sometimes fifty men deep1 which made a narrow front1 and it was not difficult to find a field in which both armies might be marshalled and might engage with each other4 ,even where any body of the troops was kept off by hedges1 hillocks1 woods1 or hollow ways1 the battle was not so soon decided between the contending parties but that the others had time to overcome the difficulties which opposed them and take part in the engagement4 ,and as the whole armies were thus engaged1 and each man closely buckled to his antagonist1 the battles were commonly very bloody1 and great slaughter was made on both sides1 especially on the vanquished4 ,the long thin lines required by firearms1 and the quick decision of the fray1 render our modern engagements but partial rencounters1 and enable the general who is foiled in the beginning of the day to draw off the greatest part of his army1 sound and entire4 ,could ,folard's project of the column take place 7which seems impracticable#ei7 it would render modern battles as destructive as the ancient4 ,the battles of antiquity1 both by their duration and their resemblance of single combats1 were wrought up to a degree of fury quite unknown to later ages4 ,nothing could then engage the combatants to give quarter but the hopes of profit by making slaves of their prisoners4 ,in civil wars1 as we learn from ,tacitus1 the battles were the most bloody1 because the prisoners were not slaves4 ,what a stout resistance must be made where the vanquished expected so hard a fate6 ,how inveterate the rage where the maxims of war were1 in every respect1 so bloody and severe6 ,instances are very frequent in ancient history of cities besieged whose inhabitants1 rather than open their gates1 murdered their wives and children1 and rushed themselves on a voluntary death1 sweetened perhaps with a little prospect of revenge upon the enemy4 ,greeks as well as barbarians have been often wrought up to this degree of fury4 ,and the same determined spirit and cruelty must1 in many other instances less remarkable1 have been extremely destructive to human society in those petty commonwealths which lived in a close neighbourhood1 and were engaged in perpetual wars and contentions4 ,sometimes the wars in ,greece1 says ,plutarch1 were carried on entirely by inroads and robberies and piracies4 ,such a method of war must be more destructive in small states than the bloodiest battles and sieges4 ,by the laws of the twelve tables1 possession for two years formed a prescription for land2 one year for movables2#fj an indication that there was not in ,italy during that period much more order1 tranquillity1 and settled police than there is at present among the ,tartars4 ,the only cartel ,i remember in ancient history is that between ,demetrius ,poliorcetes and the ,rhodians1 when it was agreed that a free citizen should be restored for #ajjj drachmas1 a slave bearing arms for #ejj4 ,but1 secondly1 it appears that ancient manners were more unfavourable than the modern1 not only in times of war but also in those of peace2 and that too in every respect1 except the love of civil liberty and equality1 which is1 ,i own1 of considerable importance4 ,to exclude faction from a free government is very difficult1 if not altogether impracticable2 but such inveterate rage between the factions and such bloody maxims are found1 in modern times1 amongst religious parties alone1 where bigoted priests are the accusers1 judges1 and executioners4 ,in ancient history we may always observe1 where one party prevailed1 whether the nobles or people 7for ,i can observe no difference in this respect#fa71 that they immediately butchered all of the opposite party who fell into their hands1 and banished such as had been so fortunate as to escape their fury4 ,no form of process1 no law1 no trial1 no pardon4 ,a fourth1 a third1 perhaps near a half of the city were slaughtered or expelled every revolution2 and the exiles always joined foreign enemies and did all the mischief possible to their fellow-citizens1 till fortune put it in their power to take full revenge by a new revolution4 ,and as these were very frequent in such violent governments1 the disorder1 diffidence1 jealousy1 enmity which must prevail are not easy for us to imagine in this age of the world4 ,there are only two revolutions ,i can recollect in ancient history which passed without great severity and great effusion of blood in massacres and assassinations--viz41 the restoration of the ,athenian democracy by ,thrasybulus1 and the subduing the ,roman republic by ,csar4 ,we learn from ancient history that ,thrasybulus passed a general amnesty for all past offences1 and first introduced that word as well as practice into ,greece4 ,it appears1 however1 from many orations of ,lysias1 that the chief1 and even some of the subaltern offenders in the preceding tyranny were tried and capitally punished4 ,this is a difficulty not cleared up1 and even not observed by antiquarians and historians4 ,and as to ,csar's clemency1 though much celebrated1 it would not gain great applause in the present age4 ,he butchered1 for instance1 all ,cato's senate1 when he became master of ,utica2 and these1 we may readily believe1 were not the most worthless of the party4 ,all those who had borne arms against that usurper were forfeited1 and1 by ,hirtius's law1 declared incapable of all public offices4 ,these people were extremely fond of liberty1 but seem not to have understood it very well4 ,when the ,thirty ,tyrants first established their dominion at ,athens1 they began with seizing all the sycophants and informers who had been so troublesome during the ,democracy1 and putting them to death by an arbitrary sentence and execution4 8,every man10 says ,sallust and ,lysias1#fb 8rejoiced at these punishments20 not considering that liberty was from that moment annihilated4 ,the utmost energy of the nervous style of ,thucydides1 and the copiousness and expression of the ,greek language1 seem to sink under that historian when he attempts to describe the disorders which arose from faction throughout all the ,greek commonwealths4 ,you would imagine that he still labours with a thought greater than he can find words to communicate1 and he concludes his pathetic description with an observation which is at once very refined and very solid4 8,in these contests10 says he1 8those who were dullest and most stupid1 and had the least foresight1 commonly prevailed2 for being conscious of this weakness1 and dreading to be over-reached by those of greater penetration1 they went to work hastily1 without premeditation1 by the sword and poniard1 and thereby prevented their antagonists1 who were forming fine schemes and projects for their destruction40#fc ,not to mention ,dionysius the elder1 who is computed to have butchered in cold blood above #aj1jjj of his fellow-citizens1 nor ,agathocles1 ,nabis1 and others still more bloody than he1 the transactions1 even in free governments1 were extremely violent and destructive4 ,at ,athens1 the ,thirty ,tyrants and the nobles in a twelvemonth murdered1 without trial1 about #abjj of the people1 and banished above the half of the citizens that remained4#fd ,in ,argos1 near the same time1 the people killed #abjj of the nobles1 and afterwards their own demagogues1 because they had refused to carry their prosecutions further4 ,the people also in ,corcyra killed #aejj of the nobles and banished a thousand4 ,these numbers will appear the more surprising if we consider the extreme smallness of these states4 ,but all ancient history is full of such instances4#fe ,when ,alexander ordered all the exiles to be restored through all the cities1 it was found that the whole amounted to #bj1jjj men1 the remains probably of still greater slaughters and massacres4 ,what an astonishing multitude in so narrow a country as ancient ,greece6 ,and what domestic confusion1 jealousy1 partiality1 revenge1 heart-burnings must tear those cities1 where factions were wrought up to such a degree of fury and despair6 8,it would be easier10 says ,isocrates to ,philip1 8to raise an army in ,greece at present from the vagabonds than from the cities40 ,even where affairs came not to such extremities 7which they failed not to do almost in every city twice or thrice every century71 property was rendered very precarious by the maxims of ancient government4 ,xenophon1 in the banquet of ,socrates1 gives us a very natural1 unaffected description of the tyranny of the ,athenian people4 8,in my poverty10 says ,charmides1 8,i am much more happy than ever ,i was while possessed of riches2 as much as it is happier to be in security than in terrors1 free than a slave1 to receive than to pay court1 to be trusted than suspected4 ,formerly ,i was obliged to caress every informer1 some imposition was continually laid upon me1 and it was never allowed me to travel or be absent from the city4 ,at present1 when ,i am poor1 ,i look big and threaten others4 ,the rich are afraid of me1 and show me every kind of civility and respect1 and ,i am become a kind of tyrant in the city40 ,in one of the pleadings of ,lysias1 the orator very coolly speaks of it1 by the by1 as a maxim of the ,athenian people1 that whenever they wanted money they put to death some of the rich citizens as well as strangers1 for the sake of the forfeiture4 ,in mentioning this1 he seems to have no intention of blaming them1 still less of provoking them who were his audience and judges4 ,whether a man was a citizen or a stranger among that people1 it seems indeed requisite either that he should impoverish himself or the people would impoverish him1 and perhaps kill him into the bargain4 ,the orator last mentioned gives a pleasant account of an estate laid out in the public service#ff--that is1 above the third of it in raree-shows and figured dances4 ,i need not insist on the ,greek tyrannies1 which were altogether horrible4 ,even the mixed monarchies1 by which most of the ancient states of ,greece were governed before the introduction of republics1 were very unsettled4 ,scarce any city but ,athens1 says ,isocrates1 could show a succession of kings for four or five generations4 ,besides many other obvious reasons for the instability of ancient monarchies1 the equal division of property among the brothers in private families must1 by a necessary consequence1 contribute to unsettle and disturb the state4 ,the universal preference given to the elder by modern laws1 though it increases the inequality of fortunes1 has1 however1 this good effect1 that it accustoms men to the same idea of public succession1 and cuts off all claim and pretension of the younger4 ,the new settled colony of ,heraclea1 falling immediately into factions1 applied to ,sparta1 who sent ,heripidas with full authority to quiet their dissensions4 ,this man1 not provoked by any opposition1 not inflamed by party rage1 knew no better expedient than immediately putting to death about #ejj of the citizens4 ,a strong proof how deeply rooted these violent maxims of government were throughout all ,greece4 ,if such was the disposition of men's minds among that refined people1 what may be expected in the commonwealths of ,italy1 ,africa1 ,spain1 and ,gaul1 which were denominated barbarous8 ,why otherwise did the ,greeks so much value themselves on their humanity1 gentleness1 and moderation above all other nations8 ,this reasoning seems very natural2 but unluckily the history of the ,roman commonwealth in its earlier times1 if we give credit to the received accounts1 stands against us4 ,no blood was ever shed in any sedition at ,rome till the murder of the ,gracchi4 ,dionysius ,halicarnassus1 observing the singular humanity of the ,roman people in this particular1 makes use of it as an argument that they were originally of ,grecian extraction2 whence we may conclude that the factions and revolutions in the barbarous republics were usually more violent than even those of ,greece above mentioned4 ,if the ,romans were so late in coming to blows1 they made ample compensation after they had once entered upon the bloody scene2 and ,appian's history of their civil wars contains the most frightful picture of massacres1 proscriptions1 and forfeitures that ever was presented to the world4 ,what pleases most in that historian is that he seems to feel a proper resentment of these barbarous proceedings1 and talks not with that provoking coolness and indifference which custom had produced in many of the ,greek historians4#fg ,the maxims of ancient politics contain1 in general1 so little humanity and moderation that it seems superfluous to give any particular reason for the violences committed at any particular period2 yet ,i cannot forbear observing that the laws in the latter ages of the ,roman commonwealth were so absurdly contrived that they obliged the heads of parties to have recourse to these extremities4 ,all capital punishments were abolished4 ,however criminal1 or1 what is more1 however dangerous any citizen might be1 he could not regularly be punished otherwise than by banishment2 and it became necessary in the revolutions of party to draw the sword of private vengeance2 nor was it easy1 when laws were once violated1 to set bounds to these sanguinary proceedings4 ,had ,brutus himself prevailed over the ,triumvirate1 could he1 in common prudence1 have allowed ,octavius and ,anthony to live1 and have contented himself with banishing them to ,rhodes or ,marseilles1 where they might still have plotted new commotions and rebellions8 ,his executing ,c4 ,antonius1 brother to the ,triumvir1 shows evidently his sense of the matter4 ,did not ,cicero1 with the approbation of all the wise and virtuous of ,rome1 arbitrarily put to death ,catiline's associates contrary to law and without any trial or form of process8 ,and if he moderated his executions1 did it not proceed either from the clemency of his temper or the conjunctures of the times8 ,a wretched security in a government which pretends to laws and liberty6 ,thus1 one extreme produces another4 ,in the same manner as excessive severity in the laws is apt to beget great relaxation in their execution1 so their excessive lenity naturally produces cruelty and barbarity4 ,it is dangerous to force us1 in any case1 to pass their sacred boundaries4 ,one general cause of the disorders so frequent in all ancient governments seems to have consisted in the great difficulty of establishing any aristocracy in those ages1 and the perpetual discontents and seditions of the people whenever even the meanest and most beggarly were excluded from the legislature and from public offices4 ,the very quality of freeman gave such a rank1 being opposed to that of slave1 that it seemed to entitle the possessor to every power and privilege of the commonwealth4 ,solon's laws excluded no freeman from votes or elections1 but confined some magistracies to a particular census2 yet were the people never satisfied till those laws were repealed4 ,by the treaty with ,antipater1 no ,athenian had a vote whose census was less than #bjjj drachmas 7about #fj sterling74 ,and though such a government would to us appear sufficiently democratical1 it was so disagreeable to that people that above two-thirds of them immediately left their country4 ,cassander reduced that census to the half1 yet still the government was considered as an oligarchical tyranny and the effect of foreign violence4 ,servius ,tullius's laws seem very equal and reasonable1 by fixing the power in proportion to the property1 yet the ,roman people could never be brought quietly to submit to them4 ,in those days there was no medium between a severe1 jealous aristocracy1 ruling over discontented subjects1 and a turbulent1 factious1 tyrannical democracy4 ,but1 thirdly1 there are many other circumstances in which ancient nations seem inferior to the modern1 both for the happiness and increase of mankind4 ,trade1 manufactures1 industry were nowhere in former ages so flourishing as they are at present in ,europe4 ,the only garb of the ancients1 both for males and females1 seems to have been a kind of flannel which they wore commonly white or gray1 and which they scoured as often as it grew dirty4 ,tyre1 which carried on1 after ,carthage1 the greatest commerce of any city in the ,mediterranean before it was destroyed by ,alexander1 was no mighty city1 if we credit ,arrian's account of its inhabitants4#fh ,athens is commonly supposed to have been a trading city2 but it was as populous before the ,median ,war as at any time after it1 according to ,herodotus1#fi and yet its commerce at that time was so inconsiderable that1 as the same historian observes1 even the neighbouring coasts of ,asia were as little frequented by the ,greeks as the ,pillars of ,hercules--for beyond these he conceived nothing4 ,great interest of money and great profits of trade are an infallible indication that industry and commerce are but in their infancy4 ,we read in ,lysias of #ajj per cent4 profit made of a cargo of two talents1 sent to no greater distance than from ,athens to the ,adriatic4 ,nor is this mentioned as an instance of exorbitant profit4 ,antidorus1 says ,demosthenes1 paid three talents and a half for a house which he let at a talent a year2 and the orator blames his own tutors for not employing his money to like advantage4 8,my fortune10 says he1 8in eleven years minority ought to have been tripled40 ,the value of twenty of the slaves left by his father he computes at #dj minas1 and the yearly profit of their labour at #ab4 ,the most moderate interest at ,athens 7for there was higher often paid7 was #ab per cent41 and that paid monthly4 ,not to insist upon the exorbitant interest of #cd per cent4 to which the vast sums distributed in elections had raised money at ,rome1 we find that ,verres1 before that factious period1 stated #bd per cent4 for money1 which he left in the publicans' hands4 ,and though ,cicero declaims against this article1 it is not on account of the extravagant usury1 but because it had never been customary to state any interest on such occasions4 ,interest1 indeed1 sunk at ,rome after the settlement of the empire2 but it never remained any considerable time so low as in the commercial states of modern ages4 ,among the other inconveniences which the ,athenians felt from the fortifying ,decelia by the ,lacedemonians1 it is represented by ,thucydides as one of the most considerable that they could not bring over their corn from ,eubea by land1 passing by ,oropus2 but were obliged to embark it and to sail about the promontory of ,sunium--a surprising instance of the imperfection of ancient navigation1 for the water-carriage is not here above double the land4 ,i do not remember any passage in any ancient author where the growth of any city is ascribed to the establishment of a manufacture4 ,the commerce which is said to flourish is chiefly the exchange of those commodities for which different soils and climates were suited4 ,the sale of wine and oil into ,africa1 according to ,diodorus ,siculus1 was the foundation of the riches of ,agrigentum4 ,the situation of the city of ,sybaris1 according to the same author1 was the cause of its immense populousness1 being built near the two rivers1 ,crathys and ,sybaris4 ,but these two rivers1 we may observe1 are not navigable1 and could only produce some fertile valleys for agriculture and husbandry--an advantage so inconsiderable that a modern writer would scarcely have taken notice of it4 ,the barbarity of the ancient tyrants1 together with the extreme love of liberty which animated those ages1 must have banished every merchant and manufacturer1 and have quite depopulated the state1 had it subsisted upon industry and commerce4 ,while the cruel and suspicious ,dionysius was carrying on his butcheries1 who that was not detained by his landed property1 and could have carried with him any art or skill to procure a subsistence in other countries1 would have remained exposed to such implacable barbarity8 ,the persecutions of ,philip ,,ii4 and ,louis ,,xiv4 filled all ,europe with the manufacturers of ,flanders and of ,france4 ,i grant that agriculture is the species of industry which is chiefly requisite to the subsistence of multitudes1 and it is possible that this industry may flourish even where manufactures and other arts are unknown and neglected4 ,switzerland is at present a very remarkable instance1 where we find at once the most skilful husbandmen and the most bungling tradesmen that are to be met with in all ,europe4 ,that agriculture flourished in ,greece and ,italy1 at least in some parts of them1 and at some periods1 we have reason to presume2 and whether the mechanical arts had reached the same degree of perfection may not be esteemed so material1 especially if we consider the great equality in the ancient republics1 where each family was obliged to cultivate with the greatest care and industry its own little field in order to its subsistence4 ,but is it just reasoning1 because agriculture may in some instances flourish without trade or manufactures1 to conclude that1 in any great extent of country and for any great tract of time1 it would subsist alone8 ,the most natural way surely of encouraging husbandry is first to excite other kinds of industry1 and thereby afford the labourer a ready market for his commodities and a return of such goods as may contribute to his pleasure and enjoyment4 ,this method is infallible and universal1 and as it prevails more in modern government than in the ancient1 it affords a presumption of the superior populousness of the former4 ,every man1 says ,xenophon1 may be a farmer2 no art or skill is requisite3 all consists in the industry and attention to the execution4 ,a strong proof1 as ,columella hints1 that agriculture was but little known in the age of ,xenophon4 ,all our later improvements and refinements1 have they operated nothing towards the easy subsistence of men1 and consequently towards their propagation and increase8 ,our superior skill in mechanics1 the discovery of new worlds1 by which commerce has been so much enlarged1 the establishment of posts1 and the use of bills of exchange3 these seem all extremely useful to the encouragement of art1 industry1 and populousness4 ,were we to strike off these1 what a check should we give to every kind of business and labour1 and what multitudes of families would immediately perish from want and hunger6 ,and it seems not probable that we could supply the place of these new inventions by any other regulation or institution4 ,have we reason to think that the police of ancient states was any wise comparable to that of modern1 or that men had then equal security either at home or in their journeys by land or water8 ,i question not but every impartial examiner would give us the preference in this particular4 ,thus1 upon comparing the whole1 it seems impossible to assign any just reason why the world should have been more populous in ancient than in modern times4 ,the equality of property among the ancients1 liberty1 and the small divisions of their states1 were indeed favourable to the propagation of mankind2 but their wars were more bloody and destructive1 their governments more factious and unsettled1 commerce and manufactures more feeble and languishing1 and the general police more loose and irregular4 ,these latter disadvantages seem to form a sufficient counterbalance to the former advantages1 and rather favour the opposite opinion to that which commonly prevails with regard to this subject4 ,but there is no reasoning1 it may be said1 against matter of fact4 ,if it appear that the world was then more populous than at present1 we may be assured that our conjectures are false1 and that we have overlooked some material circumstance in the comparison4 ,this ,i readily own3 all our preceding reasonings ,i acknowledge to be mere trifling1 or1 at least1 small skirmishes and frivolous rencounters which decide nothing4 ,but unluckily the main combat1 where we compare facts1 cannot be rendered much more decisive4 ,the facts delivered by ancient authors are either so uncertain or so imperfect as to afford us nothing positive in this matter4 ,how indeed could it be otherwise8 ,the very facts which we must oppose to them in computing the greatness of modern states are far from being either certain or complete4 ,many grounds of calculation proceeded on by celebrated writers are little better than those of the ,emperor ,heliogabalus1 who formed an estimate of the immense greatness of ,rome from ten thousand pound weight of cobwebs which had been found in that city4 ,it is to be remarked that all kinds of numbers are uncertain in ancient manuscripts1 and have been subject to much greater corruptions than any other part of the text1 and that for a very obvious reason4 ,any alteration in other places commonly affects the sense or grammar1 and is more readily perceived by the reader and transcriber4 ,few enumerations of inhabitants have been made of any tract of country by any ancient author of good authority so as to afford us a large enough view for comparison4 ,it is probable that there was formerly a good foundation for the number of citizens assigned to any free city1 because they entered for a share of the government1 and there were exact registers kept of them4 ,but as the number of slaves is seldom mentioned1 this leaves us in as great uncertainty as ever with regard to the populousness even of single cities4 ,the first page of ,thucydides is1 in my opinion1 the commencement of real history4 ,all preceding narrations are so intermixed with fable that philosophers ought to abandon them1 in a great measure1 to the embellishment of poets and orators4#gj ,with regard to remote times1 the numbers of people assigned are often ridiculous1 and lose all credit and authority4 ,the free citizens of ,sybaris1 able to bear arms and actually drawn out in battle1 were #cjj1jjj4 ,they encountered at ,siagra with #ajj1jjj citizens of ,crotona1 another ,greek city contiguous to them1 and were defeated4 ,this is ,diodorus ,siculus's account1 and is very seriously insisted on by that historian4 ,strabo also mentions the same number of ,sybarites4 ,diodorus ,siculus1 enumerating the inhabitants of ,agrigentum1 when it was destroyed by the ,carthaginians1 says that they amounted to #bj1jjj citizens1 #bjj1jjj strangers1 besides slaves1 who1 in so opulent a city as he represents it1 would probably be at least as numerous4 ,we must remark that the women and the children are not included1 and that therefore1 upon the whole1 the city must have contained near two millions of inhabitants4#ga ,and what was the reason of so immense an increase6 ,they were very industrious in cultivating the neighbouring fields1 not exceeding a small ,english county2 and they traded with their wine and oil to ,africa1 which1 at that time1 had none of these commodities4 ,ptolemy1 says ,theocritus1 commanded #cc1cci cities4 ,i suppose the singularity of the number was the reason of assigning it4 ,diodorus ,siculus assigns three millions of inhabitants to ,egypt1 a very small number2 but then he makes the number of their cities amount to #ah1jjj--;an evident contradiction4 ,he says the people were formerly seven millions4 ,thus remote times are always most envied and admired4 ,that ,xerxes's army was extremely numerous ,i can readily believe1 both from the great extent of his empire and from the foolish practice of the ,eastern nations of encumbering their camp with a superfluous multitude2 but will any rational man cite ,herodotus's wonderful narrations as an authority8 ,there is something very rational1 ,i own1 in ,lysias's argument upon this subject4 ,had not ,xerxes' army been incredibly numerous1 says he1 he had never built a bridge over the ,hellespont3 it had been much easier to have transported his men over so short a passage1 with the numerous shipping of which he was master4 ,polybius says that the ,romans1 between the first and second ,punic ,wars1 being threatened with an invasion from the ,gauls1 mustered all their own forces and those of their allies1 and found them amount to seven hundred thousand men able to bear arms4 ,a great number surely1 and which1 when joined to the slaves1 is probably not less1 if not rather more than that extent of country affords at present4#gb ,the enumeration too seems to have been made with some exactness1 and ,polybius gives us the detail of the particulars2 but might not the number be imagined in order to encourage the people8 ,diodorus ,siculus makes the same enumeration amount to near a million4 ,these variations are suspicious4 ,he plainly1 too1 supposes that ,italy in his time was not so populous1 another very suspicious circumstance2 for who can believe that the inhabitants of that country diminished from the time of the first ,punic ,war to that of the ,triumvirates8 ,julius ,csar1 according to ,appian1 encountered four millions of ,gauls1 killed one million1 and took another million prisoners4#gc ,supposing the number of the enemy's army and of the killed could be exactly assigned1 which never is possible1 how could it be known how often the same man returned into the armies1 or how distinguish the new from the old levied soldiers8 ,no attention ought ever to be given to such loose1 exaggerated calculations2 especially where the author tells us not the mediums upon which the calculations were founded4 ,paterculus makes the number killed by ,csar amount only to #djj1jjj3 a much more probable account1 and more easily reconciled to the history of these wars given by that conqueror himself in his ,commentaries4 ,one would imagine that every circumstance of the life and actions of ,dionysius the elder might be regarded as authentic and free from all fabulous exaggeration1 both because he lived at a time when letters flourished most in ,greece and because his chief historian was ,philistus1 a man allowed to be of great genius1 and who was a courtier and minister of that prince4 ,but can we admit that he had a standing army of #ajj1jjj foot1 #aj1jjj horse1 and a fleet of #djj galleys8 ,these1 we may observe1 were mercenary forces1 and subsisted upon their pay1 like our armies in ,europe4 ,for the citizens were all disarmed2 and when ,dion afterwards invaded ,sicily and called on his countrymen to vindicate their liberty1 he was obliged to bring arms along with him1 which he distributed among those who joined him4 ,in a state where agriculture alone flourishes there may be many inhabitants1 and if these be all armed and disciplined1 a great force may be called out upon occasion2 but great numbers of mercenary troops can never be maintained without either trade and manufactures1 or very extensive dominions4 ,the ,united ,provinces never were masters of such a force by sea and land as that which is said to belong to ,dionysius2 yet they possess as large a territory1 perfectly well cultivated1 and have infinitely more resources from their commerce and industry4 ,diodorus ,siculus allows that1 even in his time1 the army of ,dionysius appeared incredible2 that is1 as ,i interpret it1 it was entirely a fiction1 and the opinion arose from the exaggerated flattery of the courtiers1 and perhaps from the vanity and policy of the tyrant himself4 ,it is a very usual fallacy to consider all the ages of antiquity as one period1 and to compute the numbers contained in the great cities mentioned by ancient authors as if these cities had been all contemporary4 ,the ,greek colonies flourished extremely in ,sicily during the age of ,alexander2 but in ,augustus's time they were so decayed that almost all the product of that fertile island was consumed in ,italy4 ,let us now examine the numbers of inhabitants assigned to particular cities in antiquity1 and omitting the numbers of ,nineveh1 ,babylon1 and the ,egyptian ,thebes1 let us confine ourselves to the sphere of real history1 to the ,grecian and ,roman states4 ,i must own1 the more ,i consider this subject the more am ,i inclined to scepticism with regard to the great populousness ascribed to ancient times4 ,athens is said by ,plato to be a very great city2 and it was surely the greatest of all the ,greek#gd cities1 except ,syracuse1 which was nearly about the same size in ,thucydides' time1 and afterwards increased beyond it2 for ,cicero#ge mentions it as the greatest of all the ,greek cities in his time1 not comprehending1 ,i suppose1 either ,antioch or ,alexandria under that denomination4 ,athenus says that1 by the enumeration of ,demetrius ,phalereus1 there were in ,athens #ba1jjj citizens1 #aj1jjj strangers1 and #djj1jjj slaves4 ,this number is very much insisted on by those whose opinion ,i call in question1 and is esteemed a fundamental fact to their purpose2 but1 in my opinion1 there is no point of criticism more certain than that ,athenus and ,ctesicles1 whom he cites1 are here mistaken1 and that the number of slaves is augmented by a whole cypher1 and ought not to be regarded as more than #dj1jjj4 ,firstly1 when the number of citizens is said to be #ba1jjj by ,athenus1#gf men of full age are only understood4 ,for 7#a7 ,herodotus says that ,aristagoras1 ambassador from the ,ionians1 found it harder to deceive one ,spartan than #cj1jjj ,athenians1 meaning in a loose way the whole state1 supposed to be met in one popular assembly1 excluding the women and children4 7#b7 ,thucydides says that1 making allowance for all the absentees in the fleet1 army1 garrisons1 and for people employed in their private affairs1 the ,athenian ,assembly never rose to five thousand4 7#c7 ,the forces enumerated by the same historian1#gg being all citizens1 and amounting to #ac1jjj heavy-armed infantry1 prove the same method of calculation1 as also the whole tenor of the ,greek historians1 who always understand men of full age when they assign the number of citizens in any republic4 ,now1 these being but the fourth of the inhabitants1 the free ,athenians were by this account #hd1jjj1 the strangers #dj1jjj1 and the slaves1 calculating by the smaller number1 and allowing that they married and propagated at the same rate with freemen1 were #afj1jjj1 and the whole inhabitants #bhd1jjj--;a large enough number surely4 ,the other number1 #a1gbj1jjj1 makes ,athens larger than ,london and ,paris united4 ,secondly1 there were but #aj1jjj houses in ,athens4 ,thirdly1 though the extent of the walls1 as given us by ,thucydides1 be great 7viz41 eighteen miles1 beside the sea-coast71 yet ,xenophon says there was much waste ground within the walls4 ,they seemed indeed to have joined four distinct and separate cities4#gh ,fourthly1 no insurrection of the slaves1 nor suspicion of insurrection1 are ever mentioned by historians1 except one commotion of the miners4 ,fifthly1 the ,athenians' treatment of their slaves is said by ,xenophon1 and ,demosthenes1 and ,plautus to have been extremely gentle and indulgent1 which could never have been the case had the disproportion been twenty to one4 ,the disproportion is not so great in any of our colonies1 and yet we are obliged to exercise a very rigorous military government over the negroes4 ,sixthly1 no man is ever esteemed rich for possessing what may be reckoned an equal distribution of property in any country1 or even triple or quadruple that wealth4 ,thus1 every person in ,england is computed by some to spend sixpence a day2 yet is he estimated but poor who has five times that sum4 ,now1 ,timarchus is said by schines to have been left in easy circumstances1 but he was master only of ten slaves employed in manufactures4 ,lysias and his brother1 two strangers1 were proscribed by the ,thirty for their great riches1 though they had but sixty apiece4 ,demosthenes was left very rich by his father1 yet he had no more than fifty-two slaves4 ,his workhouse1 of twenty cabinet-makers1 is said to have been a very considerable manufactory4 ,seventhly1 during the ,decelian ,war1 as the ,greek historians call it1 #bj1jjj slaves deserted and brought the ,athenians to great distress1 as we learn from ,thucydides4 ,this could not have happened had they been only the twentieth part4 ,the best slaves would not desert4 ,eighthly1 ,xenophon proposes a scheme for entertaining by the public #aj1jjj slaves4 8,and that so great a number may possibly be supported any one will be convinced10 says he1 8who considers the numbers we possessed before the ,decelian ,war0--a way of speaking altogether incompatible with the larger number of ,athenus4 ,ninthly1 the whole census of the state of ,athens was less than #fjjj talents2 and though numbers in ancient manuscripts be often suspected by critics1 yet this is unexceptionable1 both because ,demosthenes1 who gives it1 gives also the detail1 which checks him1 and because ,polybius assigns the same number and reasons upon it4 ,now1 the most vulgar slave could yield by his labour an obolus a day1 over and above his maintenance1 as we learn from ,xenophon1 who says that ,nicias's overseer paid his master so much for slaves1 whom he employed in digging of mines4 ,if you will take the pains to estimate an obolus a day and the slaves at #djj1jjj1 computing only at four years' purchase1 you will find the sum above #ab1jjj talents1 even though allowance be made for the great number of holidays in ,athens4 ,besides1 many of the slaves would have a much greater value from their art4 ,the lowest that ,demosthenes estimates any of his father's slaves is two minas a head2 and upon this supposition it is a little difficult1 ,i confess1 to reconcile even the number of #dj1jjj slaves with the census of #fjjj talents4 ,tenthly1 ,chios is said by ,thucydides to contain more slaves than any ,greek city except ,sparta4 ,sparta then had more than ,athens1 in proportion to the number of citizens4 ,the ,spartans were #ijjj in the town1 #cj1jjj in the country4 ,the male slaves1 therefore1 of full age1 must have been more than #ghj1jjj2 the whole more than #c1abj1jjj--;a number impossible to be maintained in a narrow barren country such as ,laconia1 which had no trade4 ,had the ,helotes been so very numerous1 the murder of #bjjj mentioned by ,thucydides would have irritated them without weakening them4 ,besides1 we are to consider that the number assigned by ,athenus1#gi whatever it is1 comprehends all the inhabitants of ,attica as well as those of ,athens4 ,the ,athenians affected much a country life1 as we learn from ,thucydides1 and when they were all chased into town by the invasion of their territory during the ,peloponnesian ,war1 the city was not able to contain them1 and they were obliged to lie in the porticoes1 temples1 and even streets1 for want of lodging4 ,the same remark is to be extended to all the other ,greek cities1 and when the number of the citizens is assigned we must always understand it of the inhabitants of the neighbouring country as well as of the city4 ,yet1 even with this allowance1 it must be confessed that ,greece was a populous country and exceeded what we could imagine of so narrow a territory1 naturally not very fertile1 and which drew no supplies of corn from other places2 for1 excepting ,athens1 which traded to ,pontus for that commodity1 the other cities seem to have subsisted chiefly from their neighbouring territory4#hj ,rhodes is well known to have been a city of extensive commerce and of great fame and splendour1 yet it contained only #fjjj citizens able to bear arms when it was besieged by ,demetrius4 ,thebes was always one of the capital cities of ,greece1 but the number of its citizens exceeded not those of ,rhodes4#ha ,phliasia is said to be a small city by ,xenophon1 yet we find that it contained #fjjj citizens4 ,i pretend not to reconcile these two facts4 ,perhaps ,xenophon calls ,phliasia a small town because it made but a small figure in ,greece and maintained only a subordinate alliance with ,sparta2 or perhaps the country belonging to it was extensive1 and most of the citizens were employed in the cultivation of it and dwelt in the neighbouring villages4 ,mantinea was equal to any city in ,arcadia1 consequently it was equal to ,megalopolis1 which was fifty stadia1 or sixty miles and a quarter in circumference4 ,but ,mantinea had only #cjjj citizens4 ,the ,greek cities1 therefore1 contained often fields and gardens1 together with the houses1 and we cannot judge of them by the extent of their walls4 ,athens contained no more than #aj1jjj houses1 yet its walls1 with the sea-coast1 were about twenty miles in extent4 ,syracuse was twenty-two miles in circumference1 yet was scarcely ever spoken of by the ancients as more populous than ,athens4 ,babylon was a square of fifteen miles1 or sixty miles in circuit2 but it contained large cultivated fields and enclosures1 as we learn from ,pliny4 ,though ,aurelian's wall was fifty miles in circumference1 the circuit of all the thirteen divisions of ,rome1 taken apart1 according to ,publius ,victor1 was only about forty-three miles4 ,when an enemy invaded the country all the inhabitants retired within the walls of the ancient cities1 with their cattle and furniture and instruments of husbandry1 and the great height to which the walls were raised enabled a small number to defend them with facility4 8,sparta10 says ,xenophon1#hb 8is one of the cities of ,greece that has the fewest inhabitants40 ,yet ,polybius says that it was forty-eight stadia in circumference1 and was round4 ,all the tolians able to bear arms in ,antipater's time1 deducting some few garrisons1 were but ten thousand men4 ,polybius tells us that the ,achan league might1 without any inconvenience1 march thirty or forty thousand men2 and this account seems very probable1 for that league comprehended the greatest part of ,peloponnesus4 ,yet ,pausanias1 speaking of the same period1 says that all the ,achans able to bear arms1 even when several manumitted slaves were joined to them1 did not amount to fifteen thousand4 ,the ,thessalians1 till their final conquest by the ,romans1 were in all ages turbulent1 factious1 seditious1 disorderly4 ,it is not1 therefore1 natural to suppose that that part of ,greece abounded much in people4 ,we are told by ,thucydides that the part of ,peloponnesus adjoining to ,pylos was desert and uncultivated4 ,herodotus says that ,macedonia was full of lions and wild bulls1 animals which can only inhabit vast unpeopled forests4 ,these were the two extremities of ,greece4 ,all the inhabitants of ,epirus1 of all ages1 sexes1 and conditions1 who were sold by ,paulus milius1 amounted only to #aej1jjj4 ,yet ,epirus might be double the extent of ,yorkshire4 ,justin tells us that when ,philip of ,macedon was declared head of the ,greek confederacy he called a congress of all the states1 except the ,lacedemonians1 who refused to concur2 and he found the force of the whole1 upon computation1 to amount to #bjj1jjj infantry and #ae1jjj cavalry4 ,this must be understood to be all the citizens capable of bearing arms1 for as the ,greek republics maintained no mercenary forces1 and had no militia distinct from the whole body of the citizens1 it is not conceivable what other medium there could be of computation4 ,that such an army could ever by ,greece be brought into the field1 and could be maintained there1 is contrary to all history4 ,upon this supposition1 therefore1 we may thus reason4 ,the free ,greeks of all ages and sexes were #hfj1jjj4 ,the slaves1 estimating them by the number of ,athenian slaves as above1 who seldom married or had families1 were double the male citizens of full age--viz41 #dcj1jjj4 ,and all the inhabitants of ancient ,greece1 excepting ,laconia1 were about #a1bij1jjj--no mighty number1 nor exceeding what may be found at present in ,scotland1 a country of nearly the same extent1 and very indifferently peopled4 ,we may now consider the numbers of people in ,rome and ,italy1 and collect all the lights afforded us by scattered passages in ancient authors4 ,we shall find1 upon the whole1 a great difficulty in fixing any opinion on that head1 and no reason to support those exaggerated calculations so much insisted on by modern writers4 ,dionysius ,halicarnassus says that the ancient walls of ,rome were nearly of the same compass with those of ,athens1 but that the suburbs ran out to a great extent1 and it was difficult to tell where the town ended or the country began4 ,in some places of ,rome1 it appears from the same author1 from ,juvenal1 and from other ancient writers1#hc that the houses were high1 and families lived in separate storeys1 one above another2 but it is probable that these were only the poorer citizens1 and only in some few streets4 ,if we may judge from the younger ,pliny's#hd account of his house1 and from ,bartoli's plans of ancient buildings1 the men of quality had very spacious palaces2 and their buildings were like the ,chinese houses at this day1 where each apartment is separated from the rest1 and rises no higher than a single storey4 ,to which1 if we add that the ,roman nobility much affected porticoes1 and even woods1 in town1 we may perhaps allow ,vossius 7though there is no manner of reason for it7 to read the famous passage of the elder ,pliny#he his own way1 without admitting the extravagant consequences which he draws from it4 ,the number of citizens who received corn by the public distribution in ,augustus's time was #bjj1jjj4 ,this one would esteem a pretty certain ground of calculation1 yet it is attended with such circumstances as throw us back into doubt and uncertainty4 ,did the poorer citizens only receive the distribution8 ,it was calculated1 to be sure1 chiefly for their benefit2 but it appears from a passage in ,cicero that the rich might also take their portion1 and that it was esteemed no reproach in them to apply for it4 ,to whom was the corn given--whether only to heads of families1 or to every man1 woman1 and child8 ,the portion every month was five modii to each 7about five-sixths of a bushel74 ,this was too little for a family1 and too much for an individual4 ,a very accurate antiquarian therefore infers that it was given to every man of full years1 but he allows the matter to be uncertain4 ,was it strictly inquired whether the claimant lived within the precincts of ,rome1 or was it sufficient that he presented himself at the monthly distribution8 ,this last seems more probable4#hf ,were there no false claimants8 ,we are told that ,csar struck off at once #agj1jjj1 who had crept in without a just title2 and it is very little probable that he remedied all abuses4 ,but1 lastly1 what proportion of slaves must we assign to these citizens8 ,this is the most material question1 and the most uncertain4 ,it is very doubtful whether ,athens can be established as a rule for ,rome4 ,perhaps the ,athenians had more slaves1 because they employed them in manufactures1 for which a capital city like ,rome seems not so proper4 ,perhaps1 on the other hand1 the ,romans had more slaves1 on account of their superior luxury and riches4 ,there were exact bills of mortality kept at ,rome2 but no ancient author has given us the number of burials1 except ,suetonius1 who tells us that in one season there were #cj1jjj dead carried into the temple of ,libetina2 but this was during a plague1 which can afford no certain foundation for any inference4 ,the public corn1 though distributed only to #bjj1jjj citizens1 affected very considerably the whole agriculture of ,italy1 a fact no way reconcilable to some modern exaggerations with regard to the inhabitants of that country4 ,the best ground of conjecture ,i can find concerning the greatness of ancient ,rome is this3 ,we are told by ,herodian that ,antioch and ,alexandria were very little inferior to ,rome4 ,it appears from ,diodorus ,siculus that one straight street of ,alexandria1 reaching from port to port1 was five miles long2 and as ,alexandria was much more extended in length than breadth1 it seems to have been a city nearly of the bulk of ,paris1#hg and ,rome might be about the size of ,london4 ,there lived in ,alexandria1 in ,diodorus ,siculus's time1 #cjj1jjj free people1 comprehending1 ,i suppose1 women and children4#hh ,but what number of slaves8 ,had we any just ground to fix these at an equal number with the free inhabitants1 it would favour the foregoing calculation4 ,there is a passage in ,herodian which is a little surprising4 ,he says positively that the palace of the emperor was as large as all the rest of the city4 ,this was ,nero's golden house1 which is indeed represented by ,suetonius and ,pliny#hi as of an enormous extent1 but no power of imagination can make us conceive it to bear any proportion to such a city as ,london4 ,we may observe that1 had the historian been relating ,nero's extravagance1 and had he made use of such an expression1 it would have had much less weight1 these rhetorical exaggerations being so apt to creep into an author's style even when the most chaste and correct2 but it is mentioned by ,herodian only by the by1 in relating the quarrels between ,geta and ,caracalla4 ,it appears from the same historian that there was then much land uncultivated and put to no manner of use1 and he ascribes it as a great praise to ,pertinax that he allowed every one to take such land either in ,italy or elsewhere and cultivate it as he pleased1 without paying any taxes4 ,lands uncultivated and put to no manner of use6 ,this is not heard of in any part of ,christendom1 except perhaps in some remote parts of ,hungary1 as ,i have been informed4 ,and it surely corresponds very ill with that idea of the extreme populousness of antiquity so much insisted on4 ,we learn from ,vopiscus that there was in ,etruria much fertile land uncultivated1 which the ,emperor ,aurelian intended to convert into vineyards1 in order to furnish the ,roman people with a gratuitous distribution of wine3 a very proper expedient to dispeople still further that capital and all the neighbouring territories4 ,it may not be amiss to take notice of the account which ,polybius gives of the great herds of swine to be met with in ,tuscany and ,lombardy1 as well as in ,greece1 and of the method of feeding them which was then practised4 8,there are great herds of swine10 says he1 8throughout all ,italy1 particularly in former times1 through ,etruria and ,cisalpine ,gaul4 ,and a herd frequently contains a thousand or more swine4 ,when one of these herds in feeding meets with another they mix together1 and the swineherds have no other expedient to separate them than to go to different quarters1 where they sound their horn1 and these animals1 being accustomed to that signal1 run immediately each to the horn of his own keeper4 ,whereas in ,greece1 if the herds of swine happen to mix in the forests1 he who has the greatest flock takes cunningly the opportunity of driving all away4 ,and thieves are very apt to purloin the straggling hogs which have wandered to a great distance from their keeper in search of food40 ,may we not infer from this account that the ,north of ,italy was then much less peopled and worse cultivated than at present8 ,how could these vast herds be fed in a country so thick of enclosures1 so improved by agriculture1 so divided by farms1 so planted with vines and corn intermingled together8 ,i must confess that ,polybius's relation has more the air of that economy which is to be met with in our ,american colonies than the management of a ,european country4 ,we meet with a reflection in ,aristotle's#ij ,ethics which seems to me unaccountable on any supposition1 and by proving too much in favour of our present reasoning1 may be thought really to prove nothing4 ,that philosopher1 treating of friendship1 and observing that that relation ought neither to be contracted to the very few nor extended over a great multitude1 illustrates his opinion by the following argument4 8,in like manner10 says he1 8as a city cannot subsist if it either have so few inhabitants as ten1 or so many as a hundred thousand1 so is there a mediocrity required in the number of friends1 and you destroy the essence of friendship by running into either extreme40 ,what6 impossible that a city can contain a hundred thousand inhabitants6 ,had ,aristotle never seen nor heard of a city which was near so populous8 ,this1 ,i must own1 passes my comprehension4 ,pliny tells us that ,seleucia1 the seat of the ,greek empire in the ,east1 was reported to contain #fjj1jjj people4 ,carthage is said by ,strabo to have contained #gjj1jjj4 ,the inhabitants of ,pekin are not much more numerous4 ,london1 ,paris1 and ,constantinople may admit of nearly the same computation2 at least1 the two latter cities do not exceed it4 ,rome1 ,alexandria1 ,antioch we have already spoke of4 ,from the experience of past and present ages one might conjecture that there is a kind of impossibility that any city could ever rise much beyond this proportion4 ,whether the grandeur of a city be founded on commerce or on empire1 there seems to be invincible obstacles which prevent its further progress4 ,the seats of vast monarchies1 by introducing extravagant luxury1 irregular expense1 idleness1 dependence1 and false ideas of rank and superiority1 are improper for commerce4 ,extensive commerce checks itself by raising the price of all labour and commodities4 ,when a great court engages the attendance of a numerous nobility possessed of overgrown fortunes1 the middling gentry remain in their provincial towns1 where they can make a figure on a moderate income4 ,and if the dominions of a state arrive at an enormous size1 there necessarily arise many capitals in the remoter provinces1 whither all the inhabitants except a few courtiers repair for education1 fortune1 and amusement4#ia ,london1 by uniting extensive commerce and middling empire1 has perhaps arrived at a greatness which no city will ever be able to exceed4 ,choose ,dover or ,calais for a centre3 draw a circle of two hundred miles radius2 you comprehend ,london1 ,paris1 the ,netherlands1 the ,united ,provinces1 and some of the best cultivated counties of ,france and ,england4 ,it may safely1 ,i think1 be affirmed that no spot of ground can be found in antiquity1 of equal extent1 which contained near so many great and populous cities1 and was so stocked with riches and inhabitants4 ,to balance1 in both periods1 the states which possessed most art1 knowledge1 civility1 and the best police seems the truest method of comparison4 ,it is an observation of ,l',abb du ,bos that ,italy is warmer at present than it was in ancient times4 8,the annals of ,rome tell us10 says he1 8that in the year #dhj ,a4,u4,c4 the winter was so severe that it destroyed the trees4 ,the ,tiber froze in ,rome1 and the ground was covered with snow for forty days4 ,when ,juvenal describes a superstitious woman1 he represents her as breaking the ice of the ,tiber that she might perform her ablutions4 8#8,hybernum fracta glacie descendet in amnem1 ,ter matutino ,tyberi mergetur4' 8,he speaks of that river's freezing as a common event4 ,many passages of ,horace suppose the streets of ,rome full of snow and ice4 ,we should have more certainty with regard to this point had the ancients known the use of thermometers2 but their writers1 without intending it1 give us information sufficient to convince us that the winters are now much more temperate at ,rome than formerly4 ,at present the ,tiber no more freezes at ,rome than the ,nile at ,cairo4 ,the ,romans esteem the winter very rigorous if the snow lies two days1 and if one sees for eight-and-forty hours a few icicles hang from a fountain that has a north exposition40 ,the observation of this ingenious critic may be extended to other ,european climates4 ,who could discover the mild climate of ,france in ,diodorus ,siculus's description of that of ,gaul8 8,as it is a northern climate10 says he1 8it is infested with cold to an extreme degree4 ,in cloudy weather1 instead of rain1 there fall great snows1 and in clear weather it there freezes so excessive hard that the rivers acquire bridges of their own substance1 over which not only single travellers may pass1 but large armies1 accompanied with all their baggage and loaded waggons4 ,and there being many rivers in ,gaul--the ,rhone1 the ,rhine1 etc4--almost all of them are frozen over1 and it is usual1 in order to prevent falling1 to cover the ice with chaff and straw at the places where the road passes40 8,colder than a ,gallic winter0 is used by ,petronius as a proverbial expression4 8,north of the ,cevennes10 says ,strabo1 8,gaul produces not figs and olives1 and the vines which have been planted bear not grapes that will ripen40 ,ovid positively maintains1 with all the serious affirmation of prose1 that the ,euxine ,sea was frozen over every winter in his time1 and he appeals to ,roman governors1 whom he names1 for the truth of his assertion4 ,this seldom or never happens at present in the latitude of ,tomi1 whither ,ovid was banished4 ,all the complaints of the same poet seem to mark a rigour of the seasons which is scarce experienced at present in ,petersburg or ,stockholm4 ,tournefort1 a ,provenal1 who had travelled into the same countries1 observes that there is not a finer climate in the world2 and he asserts that nothing but ,ovid's melancholy could have given him such dismal ideas of it4 ,but the facts mentioned by that poet are too circumstantial to bear any such interpretation4 ,polybius says that the climate in ,arcadia was very cold1 and the air moist4 8,italy10 says ,varro1 8is the most temperate climate in ,europe4 ,the inland parts0 7,gaul1 ,germany1 and ,pannonia1 no doubt7 8have almost perpetual winter40 ,the northern parts of ,spain1 according to ,strabo1 are but ill inhabited because of the great cold4 ,allowing1 therefore1 this remark to be just1 that ,europe is become warmer than formerly1 how can we account for it8 ,plainly by no other method than by supposing that the land is at present much better cultivated1 and that the woods are cleared which formerly threw a shade upon the earth and kept the rays of the sun from penetrating to it4 ,our northern colonies in ,america become more temperate in proportion as the woods are felled1#ib but in general1 every one may remark that cold still makes itself more severely felt both in ,north and ,south ,america1 than in places under the same latitude in ,europe4 ,saserna1 quoted by ,columella1 affirmed that the disposition of the heavens was altered before his time1 and that the air had become much milder and warmer4 8,as appears hence10 says he1 8that many places now abound with vineyards and olive plantations which formerly1 by reason of the rigour of the climate1 could raise none of these productions40 ,such a change1 if real1 will be allowed an evident sign of the better cultivation and peopling of countries before the age of ,saserna2#ic and if it be continued to the present times1 is a proof that these advantages have been continually increasing throughout this part of the world4 ,let us now cast our eye over all the countries which were the scene of ancient and modern history1 and compare their past and present situation4 ,we shall not1 perhaps1 find such foundation for the complaint of the present emptiness and depopulation of the world4 ,egypt is represented by ,maillet1 to whom we owe the best account of it1 as extremely populous1 though he esteems the number of its inhabitants to be diminished4 ,syria1 and the ,lesser ,asia1 as well as the coast of ,barbary1 ,i can really own to be very desert in comparison of their ancient condition4 ,the depopulation of ,greece is also very obvious4 ,but whether the country now called ,turkey in ,europe may not1 in general1 contain as many inhabitants as during the flourishing period of ,greece may be a little doubtful4 ,the ,thracians seem then to have lived like the ,tartars at present1 by pillage and plunder2 the ,getes were still more uncivilized1 and the ,illyrians were no better4 ,these occupy nine-tenths of that country1 and though the government of the ,turks be not very favourable to industry and propagation1 yet it preserves at least peace and order among the inhabitants1 and is preferable to that barbarous1 unsettled condition in which they anciently lived4 ,poland and ,muscovy in ,europe are not populous1 but are certainly much more so than the ancient ,sarmatia and ,scythia1 where no husbandry or tillage was ever heard of1 and pasturage was the sole art by which the people were maintained4 ,the like observation may be extended to ,denmark and ,sweden4 ,no one ought to esteem the immense swarms of people which formerly came from the ,north1 and overran all ,europe1 to be any objection to this opinion4 ,where a whole nation1 or even half of it1 remove their seat1 it is easy to imagine what a prodigious multitude they must form1 with what desperate valour they must make their attacks1 and how the terror they strike into the invaded nations will make these magnify1 in their imagination1 both the courage and multitude of the invaders4 ,scotland is neither extensive nor populous1 but were the half of its inhabitants to seek new seats they would form a colony as large as the ,teutons and ,cimbri1 and would shake all ,europe1 supposing it in no better condition for defence than formerly4 ,germany has surely at present twenty times more inhabitants than in ancient times1 when they cultivated no ground1 and each tribe valued itself on the extensive desolation which it spread around1 as we learn from ,csar1 and ,tacitus1 and ,strabo4 ,a proof that the division into small republics will not alone render a nation populous1 unless attended with the spirit of peace1 order1 and industry4 ,the barbarous condition of ,britain in former times is well known1 and the thinness of its inhabitants may easily be conjectured1 both from their barbarity and from a circumstance mentioned by ,herodian1 that all ,britain was marshy1 even in ,severus's time1 after the ,romans had been fully settled in it above a whole century4 ,it is not easily imagined that the ,gauls were anciently much more advanced in the arts of life than their northern neighbours1 since they travelled to this island for their education in the mysteries of the religion and philosophy of the ,druids4#id ,i cannot therefore think that ,gaul was then near so populous as ,france is at present4 ,were we to believe1 indeed1 and join together the testimony of ,appian and that of ,diodorus ,siculus1 we must admit an incredible populousness in ,gaul4 ,the former historian says that there were #djj nations in that country2 the latter affirms that the largest of the ,gallic nations consisted of #bjj1jjj men1 besides women and children1 and the least of #ej1jjj4 ,calculating therefore at a medium1 we must admit of near #bjj1jjj1jjj of people in a country which we esteem populous at present1 though supposed to contain little more than twenty4#ie ,such calculations therefore by their extravagance lose all manner of authority4 ,we may observe that that equality of property1 to which the populousness of antiquity may be ascribed1 had no place among the ,gauls4 ,their intestine wars also1 before ,csar's time1 were almost perpetual4 ,and ,strabo observes that though all ,gaul was cultivated1 yet it was not cultivated with any skill or care1 the genius of the inhabitants leading them less to arts than arms1 till their slavery to ,rome produced peace among themselves4 ,csar enumerates very particularly the great forces which were levied at ,belgium to oppose his conquests1 and makes them amount to #bjh1jjj4 ,these were not the whole people able to bear arms in ,belgium2 for the same historian tells us that the ,bellovaci could have brought a hundred thousand men into the field1 though they engaged only for sixty4 ,taking the whole1 therefore1 in this proportion of ten to six1 the sum of fighting men in all the states of ,belgium was about #cej1jjj2 all the inhabitants a million and a half4 ,and ,belgium being about the fourth of ,gaul1 that country might contain six millions1 which is not the third of its present inhabitants4#if ,we are informed by ,csar that the ,gauls had no fixed property in land2 but that the chieftains1 when any death happened in a family1 made a new division of all the lands among the several members of the family4 ,this is the custom of ,tanistry1 which so long prevailed in ,ireland1 and which retained that country in a state of misery1 barbarism1 and desolation4 ,the ancient ,helvetia was #bej miles in length and #ahj in breadth1 according to the same author1 yet contained only #cfj1jjj inhabitants4 ,the ,canton of ,berne alone has at present as many people4 ,after this computation of ,appian and ,diodorus ,siculus1 ,i know not whether ,i dare affirm that the modern ,dutch are more numerous than the ancient ,batavi4 ,spain is decayed from what it was three centuries ago2 but if we step backward two thousand years and consider the restless1 turbulent1 unsettled condition of its inhabitants1 we may probably be inclined to think that it is now much more populous4 ,many ,spaniards killed themselves when deprived of their arms by the ,romans4 ,it appears from ,plutarch that robbery and plunder were esteemed honourable among the ,spaniards4 ,hirtius represents in the same light the situation of that country in ,csar's time1 and he says that every man was obliged to live in castles and walled towns for his security4 ,it was not till its final conquest under ,augustus that these disorders were repressed4 ,the account which ,strabo and ,justin give of ,spain corresponds exactly with those above mentioned4 ,how much therefore must it diminish from our idea of the populousness of antiquity when we find that ,cicero1 comparing ,italy1 ,africa1 ,gaul1 ,greece1 and ,spain1 mentions the great number of inhabitants as the peculiar circumstance which rendered this latter country formidable4#ig ,italy1 it is probable however1 has decayed2 but how many great cities does it still contain8 ,venice1 ,genoa1 ,pavia1 ,turin1 ,milan1 ,naples1 ,florence1 ,leghorn1 which either subsisted not in ancient times1 or were then very inconsiderable4 ,if we reflect on this1 we shall not be apt to carry matters to so great an extreme as is usual with regard to this subject4 ,when the ,roman authors complain that ,italy1 which formerly exported corn1 became dependent on all the provinces for its daily bread1 they never ascribe this alteration to the increase of its inhabitants1 but to the neglect of tillage and agriculture4 ,a natural effect of that pernicious practice of importing corn in order to distribute it gratis among the ,roman citizens1 and a very bad means of multiplying the inhabitants of any country4#ih ,the sportula1 so much talked of by ,martial and ,juvenal1 being presents regularly made by the great lords to their smaller clients1 must have had a like tendency to produce idleness1 debauchery1 and a continual decay among the people4 ,the parish-rates have at present the same bad consequences in ,england4 ,were ,i to assign a period when ,i imagine this part of the world might possibly contain more inhabitants than at present1 ,i should pitch upon the age of ,trajan and the ,antonines1 the great extent of the ,roman ,empire being then civilized and cultivated1 settled almost in a profound peace both foreign and domestic1 and living under the same regular police and government4#ii ,but we are told that all extensive governments1 especially absolute monarchies1 are destructive to population1 and contain a secret vice and poison1 which destroy the effect of all these promising appearances4 ,to confirm this1 there is a passage cited from ,plutarch1 which being somewhat singular1 we shall here examine it4 ,that author1 endeavouring to account for the silence of many of the oracles1 says that it may be ascribed to the present desolation of the world1 proceeding from former wars and factions1 which common calamity1 he adds1 has fallen heavier upon ,greece than on any other country2 insomuch that the whole could scarce at present furnish three thousand warriors1 a number which1 in the time of the ,median ,war1 were supplied by the single city of ,megara4 ,the gods1 therefore1 who affect works of dignity and importance1 have suppressed many of their oracles1 and deign not to use so many interpreters of their will to so diminutive a people4 ,i must confess that this passage contains so many difficulties that ,i know not what to make of it4 ,you may observe that ,plutarch assigns for a cause of the decay of mankind not the extensive dominion of the ,romans1 but the former wars and factions of the several nations1 all which were quieted by the ,roman arms4 ,plutarch's reasoning1 therefore1 is directly contrary to the inference which is drawn from the fact he advances4 ,polybius supposes that ,greece had become more prosperous and flourishing after the establishment of the ,roman yoke2#ajj and though that historian wrote before these conquerors had degenerated from being the patrons to be the plunderers of mankind1 yet as we find from ,tacitus that the severity of the emperors afterwards checked the licence of the governors1 we have no reason to think that extensive monarchy so destructive as it is so often represented4 ,we learn from ,strabo that the ,romans1 from their regard to the ,greeks1 maintained1 to his time1 most of the privileges and liberties of that celebrated nation1 and ,nero afterwards rather increased them4 ,how therefore can we imagine that the ,roman yoke was so burdensome over that part of the world8 ,the oppression of the proconsuls was restrained1 and the magistracies in ,greece being all bestowed in the several cities by the free votes of the people1 there was no great necessity for the competitors to attend the emperor's court4 ,if great numbers went to seek their fortunes in ,rome1 and advance themselves by learning or eloquence1 the commodities of their native country1 many of them would return with the fortunes which they had acquired1 and thereby enrich the ,grecian commonwealths4 ,but ,plutarch says that the general depopulation had been more sensibly felt in ,greece than in any other country4 ,how is this reconcilable to its superior privileges and advantages8 ,besides1 this passage by proving too much really proves nothing4 ,only three thousand men able to bear arms in all ,greece6 ,who can admit so strange a proposition1 especially if we consider the great number of ,greek cities whose names still remain in history1 and which are mentioned by writers long after the age of ,plutarch8 ,there are there surely ten times more people at present1 when there scarce remains a city in all the bounds of ancient ,greece4 ,that country is still tolerably cultivated1 and furnishes a sure supply of corn in case of any scarcity in ,spain1 ,italy1 or the ,south of ,france4 ,we may observe that the ancient frugality of the ,greeks1 and their equality of property1 still subsisted during the age of ,plutarch1 as appears from ,lucian4 ,nor is there any ground to imagine that that country was possessed by a few masters and a great number of slaves4 ,it is probable1 indeed1 that military discipline1 being entirely useless1 was extremely neglected in ,greece after the establishment of the ,roman ,empire2 and if these commonwealths1 formerly so warlike and ambitious1 maintained each of them a small city-guard to prevent mobbish disorders1 it is all they had occasion for2 and these1 perhaps1 did not amount to three thousand men throughout all ,greece4 ,i own that if ,plutarch had this fact in his eye1 he is here guilty of a very gross paralogism1 and assigns causes nowise proportioned to the effects4 ,but is it so great a prodigy that an author should fall into a mistake of this nature8#aja ,but whatever force may remain in this passage of ,plutarch1 we shall endeavour to counterbalance it by as remarkable a passage in ,diodorus ,siculus1 where the historian1 after mentioning ,ninus's army of #a1gjj1jjj foot and #bjj1jjj horse1 endeavours to support the credibility of this account by some posterior facts2 and adds that we must not form a notion of the ancient populousness of mankind from the present emptiness and depopulation which is spread over the world4 ,thus an author1 who lived at that very period of antiquity which is represented as most populous1#ajb complains of the desolation which then prevailed1 gives the preference to former times1 and has recourse to ancient fables as a foundation for his opinion4 ,the humour of blaming the present and admiring the past is strongly rooted in human nature1 and has an influence even on persons endued with the most profound judgment and most extensive learning4 ,,notes1 ,,of ,,the ,,populousness ,,of ,,ancient ,,nations4 #ci ,an ingenious writer has honoured this discourse with an answer full of politeness1 erudition1 and good sense4 ,so learned a refutation would have made the author suspect that his reasonings were entirely overthrown1 had he not used the precaution from the beginning to keep himself on the sceptical side2 and having taken this advantage of the ground1 he was enabled1 though with much inferior forces1 to preserve himself from a total defeat4 ,that reverend gentleman will always find1 where his antagonist is so entrenched1 that it will be difficult to enforce him4 ,varro1 in such a situation1 could defend himself against ,hannibal1 ,pharnaces against ,csar4 ,the author1 however1 very willingly acknowledges that his antagonist has detected many mistakes both in his authorities and reasonings2 and it was owing entirely to that gentleman's indulgence that many more errors were not remarked4 ,in this edition advantage has been taken of his learned animadversions1 and the essay has been rendered less imperfect than formerly4 #dj ,columella says 7lib4 #c1 cap4 #h7 that in ,egypt and ,africa the bearing of twins was frequent and even customary2 gemini partus familiares1 ac pne solennes sunt4 ,if this was true1 there is a physical difference both in countries and ages1 for travellers make no such remarks of these countries at present2 on the contrary1 we are apt to suppose the northern nations more fertile4 ,as those two countries were provinces of the ,roman ,empire1 it is difficult1 though not altogether absurd1 to suppose that such a man as ,columella might be mistaken with regard to them4 #da ,this too is a good reason why the smallpox does not depopulate countries so much as may at first sight be imagined4 ,where there is room for more people they will always arise1 even without the assistance of naturalisation bills4 ,it is remarked by ,don ,geronimo de ,ustariz that the provinces of ,spain which send most people to the ,indies are most populous1 which proceeds from their superior riches4 #db ,the same practice was common in ,rome1 but ,cicero seems not to think this evidence so certain as the testimony of free citizens4 7,pro ,clio47 #dc ,epistle #abb4 ,the inhuman sports exhibited at ,rome may justly be considered too as an effect of the people's contempt for slaves1 and was also a great cause of the general inhumanity of their princes and rulers4 ,who can read the accounts of the amphitheatrical entertainments without horror8 ,or who is surprised that the emperors should treat that people in the same way the people treated their inferiors8 ,one's humanity on that occasion is apt to renew the barbarous wish of ,caligula1 that the people had but one neck4 ,a man could almost be pleased by a single blow to put an end to such a race of monsters4 8,you may thank ,god10 says the author above cited 7,epistle #g71 addressing himself to the ,roman people1 8that you have a master 7viz41 the mild and merciful ,nero7 who is incapable of learning cruelty from your example40 ,this was spoken in the beginning of his reign2 but he fitted them very well afterwards1 and no doubt was considerably improved by the sight of the barbarous objects to which he had from his infancy been accustomed4 #dd ,we may here observe that if domestic slavery really increased populousness1 it would be an exception to the general rule1 that the happiness of any society and its populousness are necessary attendants4 ,a master1 from humour or interest1 may make his slaves very unhappy1 and yet be careful1 from interest1 to increase their number4 ,their marriage is not a matter of choice with them1 no more than any other action of their life4 #de ,ten thousand slaves in a day have been often sold for the use of the ,romans at ,delus in ,cilicia4--,strabo1 lib4 #ad4 #df ,as servus was the name of the genus1 and verna of the species1 without any correlative1 this forms a strong presumption that the latter were by far the least numerous4 ,it is a universal observation which we may form upon language that where two related parts of a whole bear any proportion to each other in numbers1 rank1 or consideration1 there are always correlative terms invented which answer to both the parts1 and express their mutual relation4 ,if they bear no proportion to each other1 the term is only invented for the less1 and marks its distinction from the whole4 ,thus man and woman1 master and servant1 father and son1 prince and subject1 stranger and citizen are correlative terms2 but the words--seaman1 carpenter1 smith1 tailor1 etc41 have no correspondent terms which express those who are no seaman1 no carpenter1 etc4 ,languages differ very much with regard to the particular words where this distinction obtains1 and may thence afford very strong inferences concerning the manners and customs of different nations4 ,the military government of the ,roman emperors had exalted the soldiery so high that they balanced all the other orders of the state2 hence miles and paganus became relative terms1 a thing till then unknown to ancient1 and still so to modern languages4 ,modern superstition has exalted the clergy so high that they overbalance the whole state2 hence clergy and laity are terms opposed in all modern languages1 and in these alone4 ,and from the same principles ,i infer that if the number of slaves bought by the ,romans from foreign countries had not extremely exceeded those bred at home1 verna would have had a correlative which would have expressed the former species of slaves2 but these1 it would seem1 composed the main body of the ancient slaves1 and the latter were but a few exceptions4 #dg ,verna is used by the ,roman writers as a word equivalent to scurra1 on account of the petulance and impudence of those slaves4 7,mart41 lib4 #a1 ep4 #db47 ,horace also mentions the vern procaces2 and ,petronius 7cap4 #bd71 vernula urbanitas4 ,seneca 7de provid41 cap4 #a71 vernularum licentia4 #dh ,it is computed in the ,west ,indies that a stock of slaves grow worse five per cent4 every year unless new slaves be bought to recruit them4 ,they are not able to keep up their number even in those warm countries where clothes and provisions are so easily got4 ,how much more must this happen in ,european countries1 and in or near great cities8 #di ,corn4 ,nepos in ,vita ,attici4 ,we may remark that ,atticus's estate lay chiefly in ,epirus1 which being a remote1 desolate place1 would render it profitable for him to rear slaves there4 #ej 1 makers of those beds which the ancients lay upon at meals4 #ea 8,non temere ancill ejus rei causa comparantur ut pariant0 7,digest4 lib4 #e1 tit4 #c1 de hred4 petit4 lex #bg74 ,the following texts are to the same purpose3--8,spadonem morbosum non esse1 neque vitiosum1 verius mihi videtur2 sed sanum esse1 sicuti illum qui unum testiculum habet1 qui etiam generare potest0 7,digest4 lib4 #b1 tit4 #a1 de dilitio edicto1 lex #f1 #b74 8,sin autem quis ita spado sit1 ut tam necessaria pars corporis penitus absit1 morbosus est0 7,id4 lex #g74 ,his impotence1 it seems1 was only regarded so far as his health or life might be affected by it2 in other respects he was full as valuable4 ,the same reasoning is employed with regard to female slaves4 8,quritur de ea muliere qu semper mortuos parit1 an morbosa sit8 et ait ,sabinus1 si vulv vitio hoc contingit1 morbosam esse0 7,id4 lex #ad74 ,it has even been doubted whether a woman pregnant was morbid or vitiated1 and it is determined that she is sound1 not on account of the value of her offspring1 but because it is the natural part or office of women to bear children4 8,si mulier prgnans venerit1 inter omnes convenit sanam eam esse4 ,maximum enim ac prcipuum munus fminarum accipere ac tueri conceptum4 ,puerperam quoque sanam esse2 si modo nihil extrinsecus accedit1 quod corpus ejus in aliquam valetudinem immitteret4 ,de sterili ,clius distinguere ,trebatium dicit1 ut si natura sterilis sit1 sana sit2 si vitio corporis1 contra0 7,id474 #eb ,the slaves in the great houses had little rooms assigned them1 called cell2 whence the name of cell was transferred to the monk's room in a convent4 ,see further on this head1 ,just4 ,lipsius1 ,saturn4 #a1 cap4 #ad4 ,these form strong presumptions against the marriage and propagation of the family slaves4 #ec ,tacitus blames it--,de morib4 ,germ4 #ed ,de fraterno amore4 ,seneca also approves of the exposing of sickly1 infirm children 7,de ira1 lib4 i4 cap4 #ae74 #ee ,the practice of leaving great sums of money to friends1 though one had near relations1 was common in ,greece as well as ,rome1 as we may gather from ,lucian4 ,this practice prevails much less in modern times2 and ,ben ,jonson's ,volpone is therefore almost entirely extracted from ancient authors1 and suits better the manners of those times4 ,it may justly be thought that the liberty of divorces in ,rome was another discouragement to marriage4 ,such a practice prevents not quarrels from humour1 but rather increases them2 and occasions also those from interest1 which are much more dangerous and destructive4 ,perhaps too the unnatural lusts of the ancients ought to be taken into consideration as of some moment4 #ef ,csar gave the centurions ten times the gratuity of the common soldiers 7,de bell4 ,gallico1 lib4 viii474 ,in the ,rhodian cartel1 mentioned afterwards1 no distinction in the ransom was made on account of ranks in the army4 #eg ,plin4 lib4 #ah1 cap4 #c4 ,the same author1 in cap4 #f1 says1 8,verumque fatentibus latifundia perdidere ,italiam2 jam vero et provincias4 ,sex domo semissem ,afric possidebant1 cum interfecit eos ,nero princeps40 ,in this view the barbarous butchery committed by the first ,roman emperors was not perhaps so destructive to the public as we may imagine4 ,these never ceased till they had extinguished all the illustrious families which had enjoyed the plunder of the world during the latter ages of the republic4 ,the new nobles who rose in their place were less splendid1 as we learn from ,tacit4 ,ann4 lib4 #c1 cap4 #ee4 #eh ,the ancient soldiers1 being free citizens above the lowest rank1 were all married4 ,our modern soldiers are either forced to live unmarried1 or their marriages turn to small account towards the increase of mankind--a circumstance which ought1 perhaps1 to be taken into consideration1 as of some consequence in favour of the ancients4 #ei ,what is the advantage of the column after it has broken the enemy's line8 ,only that it then takes them in flank1 and dissipates whatever stands near it by a fire from all sides2 but till it has broken them1 does it not present a flank to the enemy1 and that exposed to their musketry1 and1 what is much worse1 to their cannon8 #fj ,inst4 lib4 #b1 cap4 #f4 ,it is true the same law seems to have been continued till the time of ,justinian1 but abuses introduced by barbarism are not always corrected by civility4 #fa ,lysias1 who was himself of the popular faction and very narrowly escaped from the ,thirty ,tyrants1 says that the democracy was as violent a government as the oligarchy4 ,orat4 #bd1 de statu4 popul4 #fb ,orat4 #bd4 ,and in ,orat4 #bi he mentions the factious spirit of the popular assemblies as the only cause why these illegal punishments should displease4 #fc ,lib4 #c4 ,the country in ,europe in which ,i have observed the factions to be most violent1 and party hatred the strongest1 is ,ireland4 ,this goes so far as to cut off even the most common intercourse of civilities between the ,protestants and ,catholics4 ,their cruel insurrections1 and the severe revenges which they have taken of each other1 are the causes of this mutual ill-will1 which is the chief source of the disorder1 poverty1 and depopulation of that country4 ,the ,greek factions ,i imagine to have been inflamed still to a higher degree of rage1 the revolutions being commonly more frequent1 and the maxims of assassination much more avowed and acknowledged4 #fd ,diod4 ,sic41 lib4 #ad4 ,isocrates says there were only #ejjj banished4 ,he makes the number of those killed amount to #aejj4 ,areop4 schines contra ,ctesiph4 assigns precisely the same number4 ,seneca 7,de tranq4 anim4 cap4 #e7 says #acjj4 #fe ,we shall mention from ,diodorus ,siculus alone a few which passed in the course of sixty years during the most shining age of ,greece4 ,there were banished from ,sybaris #ejj of the nobles and their partisans 7lib4 #ab p4 #gg1 ex edit4 ,rhodomanni72 of ,chians1 #fjj citizens banished 7lib4 #ac p4 #ahi72 at ,ephesus1 #cdj killed1 #ajjj banished 7lib4 #ac p4 #bbc72 of ,cyrenians1 #ejj nobles killed1 all the rest banished 7lib4 #ad p4 #bfc72 the ,corinthians killed #abj1 banished #ejj 7lib4 #ad p4 #cjd72 ,phbidas the ,spartan banished #cjj ,botians 7lib4 #ae p4 #cdb74 ,upon the fall of the ,lacedemonians1 democracies were restored in many cities1 and severe vengeance taken of the nobles1 after the ,greek manner4 ,but matters did not end there1 for the banished nobles1 returning in many places1 butchered their adversaries at ,phial in ,corinth1 in ,megara1 in ,phliasia4 ,in this last place they killed #cjj of the people2 but these again revolting1 killed above #fjj of the nobles and banished the rest 7lib4 #ae p4 #ceg74 ,in ,arcadia #adjj banished1 besides many killed4 ,the banished retired to ,sparta and ,pallantium4 ,the latter delivered up to their countrymen1 and all killed 7lib4 #ae p4 #cgc74 ,of the banished from ,argos and ,thebes there were #ejj in the ,spartan army 7id4 p4 #cgd74 ,here is a detail of the most remarkable of ,agathocles' cruelties from the same author4 ,the people before his usurpation had banished #fjj nobles 7lib4 #ai p4 #fee74 ,afterwards that tyrant1 in concurrence with the people1 killed #djjj nobles and banished #fjjj 7id4 p4 #fdg74 ,he killed #djjj people at ,gela 7id4 p4 #gda74 ,by ,agathocles' brother #hjjj banished from ,syracuse 7lib4 #bj p4 #geg74 ,the inhabitants of gesta1 to the number of #dj1jjj1 were killed--man1 woman1 and child2 and with tortures1 for the sake of their money 7id4 p4 #hjb74 ,all the relations--viz41 father1 brother1 children1 grandfather1 of his ,libyan army1 killed 7id4 p4 #ajc74 ,he killed #gjjj exiles after capitulation 7id4 p4 #haf74 ,it is to be remarked that ,agathocles was a man of great sense and courage2 his violent tyranny1 therefore1 is a stronger proof of the manners of the age4 #ff ,in order to recommend his client to the favour of the people1 he enumerates all the sums he had expended4 ,when 1 #cj minas2 upon a chorus of men1 #bj minas2 1 #h minas2 1 #ej minas2 1 #c minas2 seven times trierarch1 where he spent #f talents3 taxes1 once #cj minas1 another time #dj2 1 #ab minas2 1 #ae minas2 1 #ah minas2 1 #g minas2 1 #ae minas2 1 #cj minas4 ,in the whole1 ten talents #ch minas--an immense sum for an ,athenian fortune1 and what alone would be esteemed great riches 7,orat4 #bj74 ,it is true1 he says1 the law did not oblige him absolutely to be at so much expense1 not above a fourth2 but without the favour of the people nobody was so much as safe1 and this was the only way to gain it4 ,see further1 ,orat4 #bd1 de pop4 statu4 ,in another place1 he introduces a speaker who says that he had spent his whole fortune--and an immense one1 eighty talents--for the people 7,orat4 #be1 de prob4 ,evandri74 ,the 1 or strangers1 find1 says he1 if they do not contribute largely enough to the people's fancy1 that they have reason to repent 7,orat4 #cj1 contra ,phil474 ,you may see with what care ,demosthenes displays his expenses of this nature1 when he pleads for himself de corona2 and how he exaggerates ,midias's stinginess in this particular1 in his accusation of that criminal4 ,all this1 by the by1 is the mark of a very iniquitous judicature3 and yet the ,athenians valued themselves on having the most legal and regular administration of any people in ,greece4 #fg ,the authorities cited above are all historians1 orators1 and philosophers whose testimony is unquestioned4 ,it is dangerous to rely upon writers who deal in ridicule and satire4 ,what will posterity1 for instance1 infer from this passage of ,dr4 ,swift8 8,i told him that in the kingdom of ,tribnia 7,britain71 by the natives called ,langdon 7,london71 where ,i had sojourned some time in my travels1 the bulk of the people consist in a manner wholly of discoverers1 witnesses1 informers1 accusers1 prosecutors1 evidences1 swearers1 together with their several subservient and subaltern instruments1 all under the colours1 the conduct1 and pay of ministers of state and their deputies4 ,the plots in that kingdom are usually the workmanship of those persons10 etc4 7,gulliver's ,travels47 ,such a representation might suit the government of ,athens1 but not that of ,england1 which is a prodigy even in modern times for humanity1 justice1 and liberty4 ,yet the ,doctor's satire1 though carried to extremes1 as is usual with him1 even beyond other satirical writers1 did not altogether want an object4 ,the ,bishop of ,rochester1 who was his friend1 and of the same party1 had been banished a little before by a bill of attainder with great justice1 but without such a proof as was legal1 or according to the strict forms of common law4 #fh ,lib4 #b4 ,there were #hjjj killed during the siege1 and the whole captives amounted to #cj1jjj4 ,diodorus ,siculus 7lib4 #ag7 says only #ac1jjj2 but he accounts for this small number by saying that the ,tyrians had sent away beforehand part of their wives and children to ,carthage4 #fi ,lib4 #e4 ,he makes the number of the citizens amount to #cj1jjj4 #gj ,in general there is more candour and sincerity in ancient historians1 but less exactness and care1 than in the moderns4 ,our speculative factions1 especially those of religion1 throw such an illusion over our minds that men seem to regard impartiality to their adversaries and to heretics as a vice or weakness2 but the commonness of books1 by means of printing1 has obliged modern historians to be more careful in avoiding contradictions and incongruities4 ,diodorus ,siculus is a good writer1 but it is with pain ,i see his narration contradict in so many particulars the two most authentic pieces of all ,greek history--viz41 ,xenophon's ,expedition and ,demosthenes' ,orations4 ,plutarch and ,appian seem scarce ever to have read ,cicero's ,epistles4 #ga ,diogenes ,laertius 7in vita ,empedoclis7 says that ,agrigentum contained only #hjj1jjj inhabitants4 #gb ,the country that supplied this number was not above a third of ,italy--viz41 the ,pope's dominions1 ,tuscany1 and a part of the kingdom of ,naples2 but perhaps in those early times there were very few slaves except in ,rome1 or the great cities4 #gc ,plutarch 7in vita ,cs47 makes the number that ,csar fought with amount only to three millions2 ,julian 7in ,csaribus7 to two4 #gd ,argos seems also to have been a great city1 for ,lysias contents himself with saying that it did not exceed ,athens4 7,orat4 #cd47 #ge ,orat4 contra ,verem1 lib4 #d1 cap4 #eb4 ,strabo1 lib4 #f1 says it was twenty-two miles in compass2 but then we are to consider that it contained two harbours within it1 one of which was a very large one1 and might be regarded as a kind of bay4 #gf ,demosthenes assigns #bj1jjj4 #gg ,lib4 #b4 ,diodorus ,siculus's account perfectly agrees 7lib4 #ab74 #gh ,we are to observe that when ,dionysius ,halicarnassus says that if we regard the ancient walls of ,rome the extent of the city will not appear greater than that of ,athens1 he must mean the ,acropolis and high town only4 ,no ancient author ever speaks of the ,pyrum1 ,phalerus1 and ,munychia as the same with ,athens2 much less can it be supposed that ,dionysius would consider the matter in that light after the walls of ,cimon and ,pericles were destroyed and ,athens was entirely separated from these other towns4 ,this observation destroys all ,vossius's reasonings and introduces common sense into these calculations4 #gi ,the same author affirms that ,corinth had once #dfj1jjj slaves1 gina #dgj1jjj2 but the foregoing arguments hold stronger against these facts1 which are indeed entirely absurd and impossible4 ,it is however remarkable that ,athenus cites so great an authority as ,aristotle for this last fact2 and the scholiast on ,pindar mentions the same number of slaves in gina4 #hj ,demost4 contra ,lept4 ,the ,athenians brought yearly from ,pontus #djj1jjj medimni or bushels of corn1 as appeared from the custom-house books2 and this was the greatest part of their importation4 ,this1 by the by1 is a strong proof that there is some great mistake in the foregoing passage of ,athenus1 for ,attica itself was so barren in corn that it produced not enough even to maintain the peasants4 ,tit4 ,liv41 lib4 #dc2 cap4 #f1 ,lucian1 in his navigium sive vota1 says that a ship1 which by the dimensions he gives seems to have been about the size of our third rates1 carried as much corn as would maintain all ,attica for a twelvemonth4 ,but perhaps ,athens was decayed at that time1 and besides it is not safe to trust such loose rhetorical calculations4 #ha ,diod4 ,sic41 lib4 #ag4 ,when ,alexander attacked ,thebes we may safely conclude that almost all the inhabitants were present4 ,whoever is acquainted with the spirit of the ,greeks1 especially of the ,thebans1 will never suspect that any of them would desert their country when it was reduced to such extreme peril and distress4 ,as ,alexander took the town by storm1 all those who bore arms were put to the sword without mercy1 and they amounted only to #fjjj men4 ,among these were some strangers and manumitted slaves4 ,the captives1 consisting of old men1 women1 children1 and slaves1 were sold1 and they amounted to #cj1jjj4 ,we may therefore conclude that the free citizens in ,thebes1 of both sexes and all ages1 were near #bd1jjj1 the strangers and slaves about #ab1jjj1 ,these last1 we may observe1 were somewhat fewer in proportion than at ,athens2 as is reasonable to imagine from this circumstance1 that ,athens was a town of more trade to support slaves1 and of more entertainment to allure strangers4 ,it is also to be remarked that thirty-six thousand was the whole number of people1 both in the city of ,thebes and the neighbouring territory2 a very moderate number1 it must be confessed1 and this computation being founded in facts which appear undisputable1 must have great weight in the present controversy4 ,the above-mentioned number of ,rhodians1 too1 were all the inhabitants of the island who were free and able to bear arms4 #hb ,de rep4 ,laced4 ,this passage is not easily reconciled with that of ,plutarch above1 who says that ,sparta had #ijjj citizens4 #hc ,strabo1 lib4 #e1 says that the ,emperor ,augustus prohibited the raising houses higher than seventy feet4 ,in another passage1 lib4 #af1 he speaks of the houses of ,rome as remarkably high4 ,see also to the same purpose ,vitruvius1 lib4 #b1 cap4 #h4 ,aristides the ,sophist1 in his oration 1 says that ,rome consisted of cities on the top of cities2 and that if one were to spread it out and unfold it1 it would cover the whole surface of ,italy4 ,where an author indulges himself in such extravagant declamations1 and gives so much in to the hyperbolical style1 one knows not how far he must be reduced4 ,but this reasoning seems natural3 if ,rome was built in so scattered a manner as ,dionysius says1 and ran so much into the country1 there must have been very few streets where the houses were raised so high4 ,it is only for want of ground that anybody builds in that inconvenient manner4 #hd ,lib4 #b1 epist4 #af2 lib4 #e1 epist4 #f4 ,it is true ,pliny there describes a country house2 but since that was the idea which the ancients formed of a magnificent and convenient building1 the great men would certainly build the same way in town4 8,in laxitatem ruris excurrunt10 says ,seneca of the rich and voluptuous1 epist4 #aad4 ,valerius ,maximus1 lib4 #d1 cap4 #d1 speaking of ,cincinnatus' field of four acres1 says3 8,augustus se habitare nunc putat1 cujus domus tantum patet quantum ,cincinnati rura patuerant40 ,to the same purpose see lib4 #cf1 cap4 #ae2 also lib4 #ah1 cap4 #b4 #he 8,mnia ejus 7,rom7 collegere ambitu imperatoribus1 censoribusque ,vespasianis1 ,a4,u4,c4 #hbh1 pass4 xiii4 ,,mcc1 complexa montes septem1 ipsa dividitur in regiones quatuordecim1 compita earum #bfe4 ,ejusdem spatii mensura1 currente a milliario in capite ,rom4 ,fori statuto1 ad singulas portas1 qu sunt hodie numero #cg1 ita ut duodecim port semel numerentur1 prtereanturque ex veteribus septem1 qu esse desierunt1 efficit passuum per directum #cj1gge4 ,ad extrema vero tectorum cum castris prtoris ab eodem ,milliario1 per vicos omnium viarum1 mensura collegit paulo amplius septuaginta millia passuum4 ,quo si quis altitudinem tectorum addat1 dignam profecto1 stimationem concipiat1 fateaturque nullius urbis magnitudinem in toto orbe potuisse ei comparari40 7,pliny1 lib4 #c1 cap4 #e47 ,all the best manuscripts of ,pliny read the passage as here cited1 and fix the compass of the walls of ,rome to be thirteen miles4 ,the question is1 what ,pliny means by #cj1gge paces1 and how that number was formed8 ,the manner in which ,i conceive it is this3 ,rome was a semicircular area of thirteen miles circumference4 ,the ,forum1 and consequently the ,milliarium1 we know was situated on the banks of the ,tiber1 and near the centre of the circle1 or upon the diameter of the semicircular area4 ,though there were thirty-seven gates to ,rome1 yet only twelve of them had straight streets1 leading from them to the ,milliarium4 ,pliny1 therefore1 having assigned the circumference of ,rome1 and knowing that that alone was not sufficient to give us a just notion of its surface1 uses this further method4 ,he supposes all the streets leading from the ,milliarium to the twelve gates to be laid together into one straight line1 and supposes we run along that line so as to count each gate once1 in which case1 he says that the whole line is #cj1gge paces2 or1 in other words1 that each street or radius of the semicircular area is upon an average two miles and a half1 and the whole length of ,rome is five miles1 and its breadth about half as much1 besides the scattered suburbs4 ,pre ,hardouin understands this passage in the same manner1 with regard to the laying together the several streets of ,rome into one line in order to compose #cj1gge paces2 but then he supposes that streets led from the ,milliarium to every gate1 and that no street exceeded #hjj paces in length4 ,but 7#a7 a semicircular area whose radius was only #hjj paces could never have a circumference near thirteen miles1 the compass of ,rome as assigned by ,pliny4 ,a radius of two miles and a half forms very nearly that circumference4 7#b7 ,there is an absurdity in supposing a city so built as to have streets running to its centre from every gate in its circumference4 ,these streets must interfere as they approach4 7#c7 ,this diminishes too much from the greatness of ancient ,rome1 and reduces that city below even ,bristol or ,rotterdam4 ,the sense which ,vossius1 in his ,observationes ,vari1 puts on this passage of ,pliny errs widely in the other extreme4 ,one manuscript of no authority1 instead of thirteen miles1 has assigned thirty miles for the compass of the walls of ,rome2 and ,vossius understands this only of the curvilinear part of the circumference1 supposing that1 as the ,tiber formed the diameter1 there were no walls built on that side4 ,but 7#a7 this reading is allowed contrary to almost all the manuscripts4 7#b7 ,why should ,pliny1 a concise writer1 repeat the compass of the walls of ,rome in two successive sentences8 7#c7 ,why repeat it with so sensible a variation8 7#d7 ,what is the meaning of ,pliny's mentioning twice the ,milliarium if a line was measured that had no dependence on the ,milliarium8 7#e7 ,aurelian's wall is said by ,vopiscus to have been drawn laxiore ambitu1 and to have comprehended all the buildings and suburbs on the north side of the ,tiber1 yet its compass was only fifty miles2 and even here critics suspect some mistake or corruption in the text4 ,it is not probable that ,rome would diminish from ,augustus to ,aurelian4 ,it remained still the capital of the same empire2 and none of the civil wars in that long period1 except the tumults on the death of ,maximus and ,balbinus1 ever affected the city4 ,caracalla is said by ,aurelius ,victor to have increased ,rome4 7#f7 ,there are no remains of ancient buildings which mark any such greatness of ,rome4 ,vossius's reply to this objection seems absurd--that the rubbish would sink sixty or seventy feet below ground4 ,it appears from ,spartian 7in vita ,severi7 that the five-mile stone in via ,lavicana was out of the city4 7#g7 ,olympiodorus and ,publius ,victor fix the number of houses in ,rome to be between forty and fifty thousand4 7#h7 ,the very extravagance of the consequences drawn by this critic1 as well as ,lipsius1 if they be necessary1 destroys the foundation on which they are grounded--that ,rome contained fourteen millions of inhabitants1 while the whole kingdom of ,france contains only five1 according to his computation1 etc4 ,the only objection to the sense which we have affixed above to the passage of ,pliny seems to lie in this1 that ,pliny1 after mentioning the thirty-seven gates of ,rome1 assigns only a reason for suppressing the seven old ones1 and says nothing of the eighteen gates1 the streets leading from which terminated1 according to my opinion1 before they reached the ,forum4 ,but as ,pliny was writing to the ,romans1 who perfectly knew the disposition of the streets1 it is not strange he should take a circumstance for granted which was so familiar to everybody4 ,perhaps1 too1 many of these gates led to wharves upon the river4 #hf ,not to take the people too much from their business1 ,augustus ordained the distribution of corn to be made only thrice a year2 but the people1 finding the monthly distribution more convenient 7as preserving1 ,i suppose1 a more regular economy in their family71 desired to have them restored4 7,sueton4 ,august4 cap4 #dj47 ,had not some of the people come from some distance for their corn1 ,augustus's precaution seems superfluous4 #hg ,quintus ,curtius says its walls were only ten miles in circumference when founded by ,alexander 7lib4 #d1 cap4 #h74 ,strabo1 who had travelled to ,alexandria1 as well as ,diodorus ,siculus1 says it was scarce four miles long1 and in most places about a mile broad 7lib4 #ag74 ,pliny says it resembled a ,macedonian cassock1 stretching out in the corners 7lib4 #e1 cap4 #aj74 ,notwithstanding this bulk of ,alexandria1 which seems but moderate1 ,diodorus ,siculus1 speaking of its circuit as drawn by ,alexander 7which it never exceeded1 as we learn from ,ammianus ,marcellinus1 lib4 #bb1 cap4 #af71 says it was 1 extremely great 7ibid474 ,the reason why he assigns for its surpassing all cities of the world 7for he excepts not ,rome7 is that it contained #cjj1jjj free inhabitants4 ,he also mentions the revenues of the kings--viz41 #fjjj talents--as another circumstance to the same purpose1 no such mighty sum in our eyes1 even though we make allowances for the different value of money4 ,what ,strabo says of the neighbouring country means only that it was well peopled1 4 ,might not one affirm1 without any great hyperbole1 that the whole banks of the river from ,gravesend to ,windsor are one city8 ,this is even more than ,strabo says of the banks of the lake ,mareotis1 and of the canal to ,canopus4 ,it is a vulgar saying in ,italy that the ,king of ,sardinia has but one town in ,piedmont--for it is all a town4 ,agrippa in ,josephus 7de bello ,judaie1 lib4 #b1 cap4 #af71 to make his audience comprehend the excessive greatness of ,alexandria1 which he endeavours to magnify1 describes only the compass of the city as drawn by ,alexander1 a clear proof that the bulk of the inhabitants were lodged there1 and that the neighbouring country was no more than what might be expected about all great towns1 very well cultivated and well peopled4 #hh ,he says 1 not 1 which last expression must have been understood of citizens alone1 and grown men4 #hi ,he says 7in ,nerone1 cap4 #cj7 that a portico or piazza of it was #cjjj feet long2 8tanta laxitas ut porticus triplices milliarias haberet40 ,he cannot mean three miles1 for the whole extent of the house from the ,palatine to the ,esquiline was not near so great4 ,so when ,vopiscus1 in ,aureliano1 mentions a portico of ,sallust's gardens1 which he calls porticus milliariensis1 it must be understood of a thousand feet4 ,so also ,horace-- 8,nulla decempedis ,metata privatis opacam ,porticus excipiebat ,arcton40 7,lib4 ii4 ode #ae47 ,so also in lib4 i4 ,satyr4 #h-- 8,mille pedes in fronte1 trecentos cippus in agrum ,hic dabat40 #ij ,lib4 ix4 cap4 #aj4 ,his expression is 1 not 2 inhabitant1 not citizen4 #ia ,such were ,alexandria1 ,antioch1 ,carthage1 ,ephesus1 ,lyons1 etc41 in the ,roman ,empire4 ,such are even ,bordeaux1 ,toulouse1 ,dijon1 ,rennes1 ,rouen1 ,aix1 etc41 in ,france2 ,dublin1 ,edinburgh1 ,york1 in the ,british dominions4 #ib ,the warm southern colonies also become more healthful2 and it is remarkable that in the ,spanish histories of the first discovery and conquest of these countries they appear to have been very healthful1 being then well peopled and cultivated4 ,no account of the sickness or decay of ,cortes's or ,pizarro's small armies4 #ic ,he seems to have lived about the time of the younger ,africanus4 7,lib4 i4 cap4 #a47 #id ,csar1 ,de bello ,gallico1 lib4 #af4 ,strabo 7lib4 #g7 says the ,gauls were not much more improved than the ,germans4 #ie ,ancient ,gaul was more extensive than modern ,france4 #if ,it appears from ,csar's account that the ,gauls had no domestic slaves1 who formed a different order from the ,plebes4 ,the whole common people were indeed a kind of slaves to the nobility1 as the people of ,poland are at this day2 and a nobleman of ,gaul had sometimes ten thousand dependants of this kind4 ,nor can we doubt that the armies were composed of the people as well as of the nobility4 ,an army of #ajj1jjj noblemen from a very small state is incredible4 ,the fighting men amongst the ,helvetii were the fourth part of the whole inhabitants--a clear proof that all the males of military age bore arms4 ,see ,csar1 ,de bello ,gall41 lib4 #a4 ,we may remark that the numbers in ,csar's commentaries can be more depended on than those of any other ancient author1 because of the ,greek translation which still remains1 and which checks the ,latin original4 #ig 8,nec numero ,hispanos1 nec robore ,gallos1 nec calliditate ,pnos1 nec artibus ,grcos1 nec denique hoc ipso hujus gentis1 ac terr domestico nativoque sensu1 ,italos ipsos ac ,latinos--superavimus40 7,de harusp4 resp41 cap4 #i47 ,the disorders of ,spain seem to have been almost proverbial3 8,nec impacatos a tergo horrebis ,iberos40 7,virg4 ,georg41 lib4 #c47 ,the ,iberi are here plainly taken by a poetical figure for robbers in general4 #ih ,though the observations of l',abb du ,bos should be admitted that ,italy is now warmer than in former times1 the consequence may not be necessary that it is more populous or better cultivated4 ,if the other countries of ,europe were more savage and woody1 the cold winds that blew from them might affect the climate of ,italy4 #ii ,the inhabitants of ,marseilles lost not their superiority over the ,gauls in commerce and the mechanic arts till the ,roman dominion turned the latter from arms to agriculture and civil life4 7,see ,strabo1 lib4 #d47 ,that author1 in several places1 repeats the observation concerning the improvement arising from the ,roman arts and civility1 and he lived at the time when the change was new and would be more sensible4 ,so also ,pliny3 8,quis enim non1 communicato orbe terrarum1 majestate ,romani imperii1 profecisse vitam putet1 commercio rerum ac societate festae pacis1 omniaque etiam1 quae occulta antea fuerant1 in promiscuo usu facta40 7,lib4 #ad1 prom47 8,numine deum electa speaking of ,italy quae coelum ipsum clarius faceret1 sparsa congregaret imperia1 ritusque molliret1 et tot populorum discordes1 ferasque linguas fermonis commercio contraheret ad colloquia1 et humanitatem homini daret2 breviterque1 una cunctarum gentium in toto orbe patria fieret40 7,lib4 #b1 cap4 #e47 ,nothing can be stronger to this purpose than the following passage from ,tertullian1 who lived about the age of ,severus3--8,certe quidem ipse orbis in promptu est1 cultior de die et instructior pristino4 ,omnia jam pervia1 omnia nota1 omnia negotiosa4 ,solitudines famosas retro fundi amoenissimi obliteraverunt1 silvas arva domuerunt1 feras pecora fugaverunt2 arenae seruntur1 saxa panguntur1 paludes eliquantur1 tantae urbes1 quantae non casae quondam4 ,jam nec insulae horrent1 nec scopuli terrent2 ubique domus1 ubique populus1 ubique respublica1 ubique vita4 ,summum testimonium frequentiae humanae1 onerosi sumus mundo1 vix nobis elementa sufficiunt2 et necessitates arctiores1 et quaerelae apud omnes1 dum jam nos natura non sustinet40 7,de anima1 cap4 #cj47 ,the air of rhetoric and declamation which appears in this passage diminishes somewhat from its authority1 but does not entirely destroy it4 ,the same remark may be extended to the following passage of ,aristides the ,sophist1 who lived in the age of ,adrian4 8,the whole world10 says he1 addressing himself to the ,romans1 8seems to keep one holiday1 and mankind1 laying aside the sword which they formerly wore1 now betake themselves to feasting and to joy4 ,the cities1 forgetting their ancient contentions1 preserve only one emulation1 which shall embellish itself most by every art and ornament8 ,theatres everywhere arise1 amphitheatres1 porticoes1 aqueducts1 temples1 schools1 academies2 and one may safely pronounce that the sinking world has been again raised by your auspicious empire4 ,nor have cities alone received an increase of ornament and beauty2 but the whole earth1 like a garden or paradise1 is cultivated and adorned2 insomuch that such of mankind as are placed out of the limits of your empire 7who are but few7 seem to merit our sympathy and compassion40 ,it is remarkable that though ,diodorus ,siculus makes the inhabitants of ,egypt1 when conquered by the ,romans1 amount only to three millions1 yet ,josephus 7,de bello ,jud41 lib4 #b1 cap4 #af7 says that its inhabitants1 excluding those of ,alexandria1 were seven millions and a half in the reign of ,nero1 and he expressly says that he drew this account from the books of the ,roman publicans who levied the poll-tax4 ,strabo 7lib4 #ag7 praises the superior police of the ,romans with regard to the finances of ,egypt above that of its former monarchs1 and no part of administration is more essential to the happiness of a people2 yet we read in ,athenus 7lib4 #a1 cap4 #be71 who flourished during the reign of the ,antonines1 that the town ,mareia1 near ,alexandria1 which was formerly a large city1 had dwindled into a village4 ,this is not1 properly speaking1 a contradiction4 ,suidas 7,august7 says that the ,emperor ,augustus1 having numbered the whole ,roman ,empire1 found it contained only #d1aja1jag men 774 ,there is here surely some great mistake1 either in the author or transcriber2 but this authority1 feeble as it is1 may be sufficient to counterbalance the exaggerated accounts of ,herodotus and ,diodorus ,siculus with regard to more early times4 #ajj ,lib4 #b1 cap4 #fb4 ,it may perhaps be imagined that ,polybius1 being dependent on ,rome1 would naturally extol the ,roman dominion2 but1 in the first place1 ,polybius1 though one sees sometimes instances of his caution1 discovers no symptoms of flattery4 ,secondly1 this opinion is only delivered in a single stroke1 by the by1 while he is intent upon another subject1 and it is allowed1 if there be any suspicion of an author's insincerity1 that these oblique propositions discover his real opinion better than his more formal and direct assertions4 #aja ,i must confess that that discourse of ,plutarch concerning the silence of the oracles is in general of so odd a texture1 and so unlike his other productions1 that one is at a loss what judgment to form of it4 ,it is written in dialogue1 which is a method of composition that ,plutarch commonly little affects4 ,the personages he introduces advance very wild1 absurd1 and contradictory opinions1 more like visionary systems or ravings of ,plato than the solid sense of ,plutarch4 ,there runs also through the whole an air of superstition and credulity which resembles very little the spirit that appears in other philosophical compositions of that author2 for it is remarkable that though ,plutarch be an historian as superstitious as ,herodotus or ,livy1 yet there is scarcely in all antiquity a philosopher less superstitious1 excepting ,cicero and ,lucian4 ,i must therefore confess that a passage of ,plutarch1 cited from this discourse1 has much less authority with me than if it had been found in most of his other compositions4 ,there is only one other discourse of ,plutarch liable to like objections--viz41 that concerning those whose punishment is delayed by the ,deity4 ,it is also written in dialogue1 contains like superstitious1 wild visions1 and seems to have been chiefly composed in rivalship to ,plato1 particularly his last book1 ,de ,republica4 ,and here ,i cannot but observe that ,monsieur ,fontenelle1 a writer eminent for candour1 seems to have departed a little from his usual character when he endeavours to throw a ridicule upon ,plutarch on account of passages to be met with in this dialogue concerning oracles4 ,the absurdities here put into the mouths of the several personages are not to be ascribed to ,plutarch4 ,he makes them refute each other1 and in general he seems to intend the ridiculing of those very opinions which ,fontenelle would ridicule him for maintaining4 7,see ,histoires des ,oracles47 #ajb ,he was contemporary with ,csar and ,augustus4 ,,of ,,the ,,original ,,contract4 ,as no party1 in the present age1 can support itself without a philosophical or speculative system of principles annexed to its political or practical one1 we accordingly find that each of the parties into which this nation is divided has reared up a fabric of the former kind1 in order to protect and cover that scheme of actions which it pursues4 ,the people being commonly very rude builders1 especially in this speculative way1 and more especially still when actuated by party zeal1 it is natural to imagine that their workmanship must be a little unshapely1 and discover evident marks of that violence and hurry in which it was raised4 ,the one party1 by tracing up the origin of government to the ,deity1 endeavour to render government so sacred and inviolate that it must be little less than sacrilege1 however disorderly it may become1 to touch or invade it in the smallest article4 ,the other party1 by founding government altogether on the consent of the people1 suppose that there is a kind of original contract by which the subjects have reserved the power of resisting their sovereign whenever they find themselves aggrieved by that authority with which they have1 for certain purposes1 voluntarily entrusted him4 ,these are the speculative principles of the two parties1 and these too are the practical consequences deduced from them4 ,i shall venture to affirm that both these systems of speculative principles are just1 though not in the sense intended by the parties2 and that both the schemes of practical consequences are prudent1 though not in the extremes to which each party1 in opposition to the other1 has commonly endeavoured to carry them4 ,that the ,deity is the ultimate author of all government will never be denied by any who admits a general providence1 and allows that all events in the universe are conducted by a uniform plan and directed to wise purposes4 ,as it is impossible for the human race to subsist1 at least in any comfortable or secure state1 without the protection of government1 government must certainly have been intended by that beneficent ,being1 who means the good of all ,his creatures2 and as it has universally1 in fact1 taken place in all countries and all ages1 we may conclude1 with still greater certainty1 that it was intended by that omniscient ,being1 who can never be deceived by any event or operation4 ,but since he gave rise to it1 not by any particular or miraculous interposition but by his concealed and universal efficacy1 a sovereign cannot1 properly speaking1 be called his vicegerent in any other sense than every power or force being derived from him may be said to act by his commission4 ,whatever actually happens is comprehended in the general plan or intention of providence2 nor has the greatest and most lawful prince any more reason1 upon that account1 to plead a peculiar sacredness or inviolable authority1 than an inferior magistrate1 or even a usurper1 or even a robber and a pirate4 ,the same divine superintendent who1 for wise purposes1 invested an ,elizabeth or a ,henry#ajc with authority1 did also1 for purposes no doubt equally wise1 though unknown1 bestow power on a ,borgia or an ,angria4 ,the same causes which gave rise to the sovereign power in every state1 established likewise every petty jurisdiction in it1 and every limited authority4 ,a constable therefore1 no less than a king1 acts by a divine commission1 and possesses an indefeasible right4 ,when we consider how nearly equal all men are in their bodily force1 and even in their mental powers and faculties1 till cultivated by education1 we must necessarily allow that nothing but their own consent could at first associate them together1 and subject them to any authority4 ,the people1 if we trace government to its first origin in the woods and deserts1 are the source of all power and jurisdiction1 and voluntarily1 for the sake of peace and order1 abandoned their native liberty1 and received laws from their equal and companion4 ,the conditions upon which they were willing to submit were either expressed1 or were so clear and obvious that it might well be esteemed superfluous to express them4 ,if this1 then1 be meant by the original contract1 it cannot be denied that all government is at first founded on a contract1 and that the most ancient rude combinations of mankind were formed entirely by that principle4 ,in vain are we sent to the records to seek for this charter of our liberties4 ,it was not written on parchment1 nor yet on leaves or barks of trees4 ,it preceded the use of writing and all the other civilized arts of life4 ,but we trace it plainly in the nature of man1 and in the equality which we find in all the individuals of that species4 ,the force which now prevails1 and which is founded on fleets and armies1 is plainly political1 and derived from authority1 the effect of established government4 ,a man's natural force consists only in the vigour of his limbs and the firmness of his courage1 which could never subject multitudes to the command of one4 ,nothing but their own consent1 and their sense of the advantages of peace and order1 could have had that influence4 ,but philosophers who have embraced a party 7if that be not a contradiction in terms7 are not contented with these concessions4 ,they assert1 not only that government in its earliest infancy arose from consent or the voluntary combination of the people1 but also that1 even at present1 when it has attained its full maturity1 it rests on no other foundation4 ,they affirm that all men are still born equal1 and owe allegiance to no prince or government unless bound by the obligation and sanction of a promise4 ,and as no man1 without some equivalent1 would forgo the advantages of his native liberty and subject himself to the will of another1 this promise is always understood to be conditional1 and imposes on him no obligation unless he meets with justice and protection from his sovereign4 ,these advantages the sovereign promises him in return1 and if he fails in the execution1 he has broke1 on his part1 the articles of engagement1 and has thereby freed his subjects from all obligations to allegiance4 ,such1 according to these philosophers1 is the foundation of authority in every government1 and such the right of resistance possessed by every subject4 ,but would these reasoners look abroad into the world they would meet with nothing that in the least corresponds to their ideas1 or can warrant so refined and philosophical a theory4 ,on the contrary1 we find everywhere princes who claim their subjects as their property1 and assert their independent right of sovereignty from conquest or succession4 ,we find also everywhere subjects who acknowledge this right in their princes1 and suppose themselves born under obligations of obedience to a certain sovereign1 as much as under the ties of reverence and duty to certain parents4 ,these connections are always conceived to be equally independent of our consent1 in ,persia and ,china2 in ,france and ,spain2 and even in ,holland and ,england1 wherever the doctrines above mentioned have not been carefully inculcated4 ,obedience or subjection becomes so familiar that most men never make any inquiry about its origin or cause1 more than about the principle of gravity1 resistance1 or the most universal laws of nature4 ,or if curiosity ever move them1 so soon as they learn that they themselves and their ancestors have for several ages1 or from time immemorial1 been subject to such a government or such a family1 they immediately acquiesce and acknowledge their obligation to allegiance4 ,were you to preach1 in most parts of the world1 that political connections are founded altogether on voluntary consent or a mutual promise1 the magistrate would soon imprison you1 as seditious1 for loosening the ties of obedience2 if your friends did not shut you up1 as delirious1 for advancing such absurdities4 ,it is strange that an act of the mind which every individual is supposed to have formed--and after he came to the use of reason too1 otherwise it could have no authority--that this act1 ,i say1 should be so unknown to all of them1 that over the face of the whole earth there scarce remain any traces or memory of it4 ,but the contract on which government is founded is said to be the original contract1 and consequently may be supposed too old to fall under the knowledge of the present generation4 ,if the agreement by which savage men first associated and conjoined their force be here meant1 this is acknowledged to be real2 but being so ancient1 and being obliterated by a thousand changes of government and princes1 it cannot now be supposed to retain any authority4 ,if we would say anything to the purpose1 we must assert that every particular government which is lawful1 and which imposes any duty of allegiance on the subject1 was at first founded on consent and a voluntary compact4 ,but besides that this supposes the consent of the fathers to bind the children1 even to the most remote generations 7which republican writers will never allow71 besides this1 ,i say1 it is not justified by history or experience in any age or country of the world4 ,almost all the governments which exist at present1 or of which there remains any record in story1 have been founded originally either on usurpation or conquest1 or both1 without any pretence of a fair consent or voluntary subjection of the people4 ,when an artful and bold man is placed at the head of an army or faction1 it is often easy for him1 by employing sometimes violence1 sometimes false pretences1 to establish his dominion over a people a hundred times more numerous than his partisans4 ,he allows no such open communication that his enemies can know with certainty their number or force4 ,he gives them no leisure to assemble together in a body to oppose him4 ,even all those who are the instruments of his usurpation may wish his fall1 but their ignorance of each other's intentions keeps them in awe1 and is the sole cause of his security4 ,by such arts as these many governments have been established1 and this is all the original contract they have to boast of4 ,the face of the earth is continually changing by the increase of small kingdoms into great empires1 by the dissolution of great empires into smaller kingdoms1 by the planting of colonies1 by the migration of tribes4 ,is there anything discoverable in all these events but force and violence8 ,where is the mutual agreement or voluntary association so much talked of8 ,even the smoothest way by which a nation may receive a foreign master1 by marriage or a will1 is not extremely honourable for the people2 but supposes them to be disposed of1 like a dowry or a legacy1 according to the pleasure or interest of their rulers4 ,but where no force interposes1 and election takes place1 what is this election so highly vaunted8 ,it is either the combination of a few great men who decide for the whole1 and will allow no opposition1 or it is the fury of a rabble that follow a seditious leader1 who is not known1 perhaps1 to a dozen among them1 and who owes his advancement merely to his own impudence1 or to the momentary caprice of his fellows4 ,are these disorderly elections1 which are rare too1 of such mighty authority as to be the only lawful foundation of all government and allegiance8 ,in reality there is not a more terrible event than a total dissolution of government1 which gives liberty to the multitude1 and makes the determination or choice of a new establishment depend upon a number which nearly approaches the body of the people2 for it never comes entirely to the whole body of them4 ,every wise man1 then1 wishes to see1 at the head of a powerful and obedient army1 a general who may speedily seize the prize and give to the people a master1 which they are so unfit to choose for themselves4 ,so little correspondent is fact and reality to those philosophical notions4 ,let not the establishment at the ,revolution deceive us1 or make us so much in love with a philosophical origin to government as to imagine all others monstrous and irregular4 ,even that event was far from corresponding to these refined ideas4 ,it was only the succession1 and that only in the regal part of the government1 which was then changed2 and it was only the majority of seven hundred who determined that change for near ten millions4 ,i doubt not1 indeed1 but the bulk of these ten millions acquiesced willingly in the determination2 but was the matter left1 in the least1 to their choice8 ,was it not justly supposed to be from that moment decided1 and every man punished who refused to submit to the new sovereign8 ,how otherways could the matter have ever been brought to any issue or conclusion8 ,the ,republic of ,athens was1 ,i believe1 the most extensive democracy which we read of in history4 ,yet if we make the requisite allowances for the women1 the slaves1 and the strangers1 we shall find that that establishment was not at first made1 nor any law ever voted1 by a tenth part of those who were bound to pay obedience to it2 not to mention the islands and foreign dominions which the ,athenians claimed as theirs by right of conquest4 ,and as it is well known that popular assemblies in that city were always full of licence and disorder1 notwithstanding the forms and laws by which they were checked1 how much more disorderly must they be where they form not the established constitution1 but meet tumultuously on the dissolution of the ancient government in order to give rise to a new one8 ,how chimerical must it be to talk of a choice in any such circumstances8 ,the ,achans enjoyed the freest and most perfect democracy of all antiquity2 yet they employed force to oblige some cities to enter into their league1 as we learn from ,polybius4 ,henry ,,iv4 and ,henry ,,vii4 of ,england had really no other title to the throne but a parliamentary election2 yet they never would acknowledge it1 for fear of weakening their authority4 ,strange6 if the only real foundation of all authority be consent and promise4 ,it is vain to say that all governments are1 or should be1 at first1 founded on popular consent1 as much as the necessity of human affairs will admit4 ,this favours entirely my pretension4 ,i maintain that human affairs will never admit of this consent2 seldom of the appearance of it4 ,but that conquest or usurpation--that is1 in plain terms1 force--by dissolving the ancient governments1 is the origin of almost all the new ones which ever were established in the world2 and that in the few cases1 where consent may seem to have taken place1 it was commonly so irregular1 so confined1 or so much intermixed either with fraud or violence1 that it cannot have any great authority4 ,my intention here is not to exclude the consent of the people from being one just foundation of government where it has place4 ,it is surely the best and most sacred of any4 ,i only pretend that it has very seldom had place in any degree1 and never almost in its full extent2 and that therefore some other foundation of government must also be admitted4 ,were all men possessed of so inflexible a regard to justice that1 of themselves1 they would totally abstain from the properties of others1 they had for ever remained in a state of absolute liberty without subjection to any magistrates or political society2 but this is a state of perfection1 of which human nature is justly esteemed incapable4 ,again1 were all men possessed of so just an understanding as always to know their own interest1 no form of government had ever been submitted to but what was established on consent1 and was fully canvassed by each member of the society2 but this state of perfection is likewise much superior to human nature4 ,reason1 history1 and experience show us that all political societies have had an origin much less accurate and regular2 and were one to choose a period of time when the people's consent was least regarded in public transactions1 it would be precisely on the establishment of a new government4 ,in a settled constitution their inclinations are often studied2 but during the fury of revolutions1 conquests1 and public convulsions1 military force or political craft usually decides the controversy4 ,when a new government is established1 by whatever means1 the people are commonly dissatisfied with it1 and pay obedience more from fear and necessity than from any idea of allegiance or of moral obligation4 ,the prince is watchful and jealous1 and must carefully guard against every beginning or appearance of insurrection4 ,time1 by degrees1 removes all these difficulties1 and accustoms the nation to regard1 as their lawful or native princes1 that family whom at first they considered as usurpers or foreign conquerors4 ,in order to found this opinion1 they have no recourse to any notion of voluntary consent or promise1 which1 they know1 never was in this case either expected or demanded4 ,the original establishment was formed by violence1 and submitted to from necessity4 ,the subsequent administration is also supported by power1 and acquiesced in by the people1 not as a matter of choice1 but of obligation4 ,they imagine not that their consent gives their prince a title2 but they willingly consent because they think that1 from long possession1 he has acquired a title independent of their choice or inclination4 ,should it be said that by living under the dominion of a prince which one might leave1 every individual has given a tacit consent to his authority1 and promised him obedience1 it may be answered that such implied consent can only take place where a man imagines that the matter depends on his choice4 ,but where he thinks 7as all mankind do who are born under established governments7 that by his birth he owes allegiance to a certain prince or certain government1 it would be absurd to infer a consent or choice1 which he expressly1 in this case1 renounces and abjures4 ,can we seriously say that a poor peasant or artisan has a free choice to leave his own country1 when he knows no foreign language or manners1 and lives from day to day by the same small wages which he acquires8 ,we may as well assert that a man1 by remaining in a vessel1 freely consents to the dominion of the master1 though he was carried on board while asleep1 and must leap into the ocean and perish the moment he leaves her4 ,what if the prince forbid his subjects to quit his dominions1 as in ,tiberius's time it was regarded as a crime in a ,roman knight that he had attempted to fly to the ,parthians1 in order to escape the tyranny of that emperor8 ,or as the ancient ,muscovites prohibited all travelling under pain of death8 ,and did a prince observe that many of his subjects were seized with the frenzy of transporting themselves to foreign countries1 he would doubtless1 with great reason and justice1 restrain them1 in order to prevent the depopulation of his own kingdom4 ,would he forfeit the allegiance of all his subjects by so wise and reasonable a law8 ,yet the freedom of their choice is surely1 in that case1 ravished from them4 ,a company of men who should leave their native country in order to people some uninhabited region might dream of recovering their native freedom2 but they would soon find that their prince still laid claim to them1 and called them his subjects1 even in their new settlement4 ,and in this he would but act conformably to the common ideas of mankind4 ,the truest tacit consent of this kind which is ever observed is when a foreigner settles in any country1 and is beforehand acquainted with the prince and government and laws to which he must submit2 yet is his allegiance1 though more voluntary1 much less expected or depended on than that of a natural born subject4 ,on the contrary1 his native prince still asserts a claim to him4 ,and if he punishes not the renegade when he seizes him in war with his new prince's commission1 this clemency is not founded on the municipal law1 which in all countries condemns the prisoner1 but on the consent of princes who have agreed to this indulgence in order to prevent reprisals4 ,suppose a usurper1 after having banished his lawful prince and royal family1 should establish his dominion for ten or a dozen years in any country1 and should preserve such exact discipline in his troops and so regular a disposition in his garrisons that no insurrection had ever been raised1 or even murmur heard1 against his administration1 can it be asserted that the people1 who in their hearts abhor his treason1 have tacitly consented to his authority and promised him allegiance merely because1 from necessity1 they live under his dominion8 ,suppose again their natural prince restored1 by means of an army which he assembles in foreign countries1 they receive him with joy and exultation1 and show plainly with what reluctance they had submitted to any other yoke4 ,i may now ask upon what foundation the prince's title stands8 ,not on popular consent surely2 for though the people willingly acquiesce in his authority1 they never imagine that their consent makes him sovereign4 ,they consent because they apprehend him to be already1 by birth1 their lawful sovereign4 ,and as to that tacit consent1 which may now be inferred from their living under his dominion1 this is no more than what they formerly gave to the tyrant and usurper4 ,when we assert that all lawful government arises from the people1 we certainly do them more honour than they deserve1 or even expect and desire from us4 ,after the ,roman dominions became too unwieldy for the republic to govern1 the people over the whole known world were extremely grateful to ,augustus for that authority which1 by violence1 he had established over them2 and they showed an equal disposition to submit to the successor whom he left them by his last will and testament4 ,it was afterwards their misfortune that there never was in one family any long1 regular succession2 but that their line of princes was continually broke1 either by private assassination or public rebellion4 ,the prtorean bands1 on the failure of every family1 set up one emperor1 the legions in the ,east a second1 those in ,germany perhaps a third2 and the sword alone could decide the controversy4 ,the condition of the people in that mighty monarchy was to be lamented1 not because the choice of the emperor was never left to them1 for that was impracticable1 but because they never fell under any succession of masters1 who might regularly follow each other4 ,as to the violence and wars and bloodshed occasioned by every new settlement1 those were not blameable1 because they were inevitable4 ,the house of ,lancaster ruled in this island about sixty years1 yet the partisans of the white rose seemed daily to multiply in ,england4 ,the present establishment has taken place during a still longer period4 ,have all views of right in another family been extinguished1 even though scarce any man now alive had arrived at years of discretion when it was expelled1 or could have consented to its dominion1 or have promised it allegiance8 ,a sufficient indication surely of the general sentiment of mankind on this head4 ,for we blame not the partisans of the abdicated family merely on account of the long time during which they have preserved their imaginary fidelity2 we blame them for adhering to a family which1 we affirm1 has been justly expelled1 and which1 from the moment the new settlement took place1 had forfeited all title to authority4 ,but would we have a more regular1 at least a more philosophical1 refutation of this principle of an original contract or popular consent1 perhaps the following observations may suffice4 ,all moral duties may be divided into two kinds4 ,the first are those to which men are impelled by a natural instinct or immediate propensity which operates in them1 independent of all ideas of obligation and of all views1 either to public or private utility4 ,of this nature are love of children1 gratitude to benefactors1 pity to the unfortunate4 ,when we reflect on the advantage which results to society from such humane instincts1 we pay them the just tribute of moral approbation and esteem2 but the person actuated by them feels their power and influence antecedent to any such reflection4 ,the second kind of moral duties are such as are not supported by any original instinct of nature1 but are performed entirely from a sense of obligation1 when we consider the necessities of human society and the impossibility of supporting it if these duties were neglected4 ,it is thus justice or a regard to the property of others1 fidelity or the observance of promises1 become obligatory and acquire an authority over mankind4 ,for as it is evident that every man loves himself better than any other person1 he is naturally impelled to extend his acquisitions as much as possible2 and nothing can restrain him in this propensity but reflection and experience1 by which he learns the pernicious effects of that licence and the total dissolution of society which must ensue from it4 ,his original inclination1 therefore1 or instinct1 is here checked and restrained by a subsequent judgment or observation4 ,the case is precisely the same with the political or civil duty of allegiance as with the natural duties of justice and fidelity4 ,our primary instincts lead us either to indulge ourselves in unlimited liberty or to seek dominion over others2 and it is this reflection only which engages us to sacrifice such strong passions to the interests of peace and order4 ,a very small degree of experience and observation suffices to teach us that society cannot possibly be maintained without the authority of magistrates1 and that this authority must soon fall into contempt where exact obedience is not paid to it4 ,the observation of these general and obvious interests is the source of all allegiance1 and of that moral obligation which we attribute to it4 ,what necessity1 therefore1 is there to found the duty of allegiance or obedience to magistrates on that of fidelity or a regard to promises1 and to suppose that it is the consent of each individual which subjects him to government1 when it appears that both allegiance and fidelity stand precisely on the same foundation1 and are both submitted to by mankind1 on account of the apparent interests and necessities of human society8 ,we are bound to obey our sovereign1 it is said1 because we have given a tacit promise to that purpose4 ,but why are we bound to observe our promise8 ,it must here be asserted that the commerce and intercourse of mankind1 which are of such mighty advantage1 can have no security where men pay no regard to their engagements4 ,in like manner may it be said that men could not live at all in society1 at least in a civilized society1 without laws and magistrates and judges to prevent the encroachments of the strong upon the weak1 of the violent upon the just and equitable4 ,the obligation to allegiance being of like force and authority with the obligation to fidelity1 we gain nothing by resolving the one into the other4 ,the general interests or necessities of society are sufficient to establish both4 ,if the reason is asked of that obedience which we are bound to pay to government1 ,i readily answer1 because society could not otherwise subsist4 ,and this answer is clear and intelligible to all mankind4 ,your answer is1 because we should keep our word4 ,but besides that1 nobody1 till trained in a philosophical system1 can either comprehend or relish this answer2 besides this1 ,i say1 you find yourself embarrassed when it is asked why we are bound to keep our word1 and you can give no other answer but what would immediately1 without any circuit1 have accounted for our obligation to allegiance4 ,but to whom is allegiance due8 ,and who are our lawful sovereigns8 ,this question is often the most difficult of any1 and liable to infinite discussions4 ,when people are so happy that they can answer1 8,our present sovereign1 who inherits1 in a direct line1 from ancestors that have governed us for many ages10 this answer admits of no reply1 even though historians1 in tracing up to the remotest antiquity the origin of that royal family1 may find1 as commonly happens1 that its first authority was derived from usurpation and violence4 ,it is confessed that private justice1 or the abstinence from the properties of others1 is a most cardinal virtue2 yet reason tells us that there is no property in durable objects1 such as lands or houses1 when carefully examined in passing from hand to hand1 but must in some period have been founded on fraud and injustice4 ,the necessities of human society1 neither in private nor public life1 will allow of such an accurate inquiry2 and there is no virtue or moral duty but what may with facility be refined away if we indulge in a false philosophy1 in sifting and scrutinizing it1 by every captious rule of logic1 in every light or position in which it may be placed4 ,the questions with regard to public property have filled infinite volumes of law and philosophy1 if in both we add the commentators to the original text2 and in the end we may safely pronounce that many of the rules there established are uncertain1 ambiguous1 and arbitrary4 ,the like opinion may be formed with regard to the successions and rights of princes and forms of government4 ,many cases no doubt occur1 especially in the infancy of any government1 which admit of no determination from the laws of justice and equity2 and our historian ,rapin allows that the controversy between ,edward ,,iii4 and ,philip de ,valois was of this nature1 and could be decided only by an appeal to heaven--that is1 by war and violence4 ,who shall tell me whether ,germanicus or ,drusus ought to have succeeded ,tiberius had he died while they were both alive without naming either of them for his successor8 ,ought the right of adoption to be received as equivalent to that of blood in a nation where it had the same effect in private families1 and had already in two instances taken place in the public8 ,ought ,germanicus to be esteemed the eldest son because he was born before ,drusus1 or the younger because he was adopted after the birth of his brother8 ,ought the right of the elder to be regarded in a nation where the eldest brother had no advantage in the succession of private families8 ,ought the ,roman ,empire at that time to be esteemed hereditary because of two examples1 or ought it even so early to be regarded as belonging to the stronger or present possessor as being founded on so recent a usurpation8 ,commodus mounted the throne after a pretty long succession of excellent emperors1 who had acquired their title1 not by birth or public election1 but by the fictitious rite of adoption4 ,that bloody debauchee being murdered by a conspiracy suddenly formed between his wench and her gallant1 who happened at that time to be ,prtorian ,prefect1 these immediately deliberated about choosing a master to humankind1 to speak in the style of those ages2 and they cast their eyes on ,pertinax4 ,before the tyrant's death was known the ,prefect went silently to that senator1 who1 on the appearance of the soldiers1 imagined that his execution had been ordered by ,commodus4 ,he was immediately saluted ,emperor by the officer and his attendants2 cheerfully proclaimed by the populace2 unwillingly submitted to by the guards2 formally recognised by the senate2 and passively received by the provinces and armies of the ,empire4 ,the discontent of the ,prtorian bands soon broke out in a sudden sedition1 which occasioned the murder of that excellent prince2 and the world being now without a master and without government1 the guards thought proper to set the ,empire formally to sale4 ,julian1 the purchaser1 was proclaimed by the soldiers1 recognized by the senate1 and submitted to by the people1 and must also have been submitted to by the provinces had not the envy of the legions begot opposition and resistance4 ,pescennius ,niger in ,syria elected himself ,emperor1 gained the tumultuary consent of his army1 and was attended with the secret good-will of the senate and people of ,rome4 ,albinus in ,britain found an equal right to set up his claim2 but ,severus1 who governed ,pannonia1 prevailed in the end above both of them4 ,that able politician and warrior1 finding his own birth and dignity too much inferior to the imperial crown1 professed at first an intention only of revenging the death of ,pertinax4 ,he marched as general into ,italy1 defeated ,julian1 and without our being able to fix any precise commencement even of the soldiers' consent1 he was from necessity acknowledged ,emperor by the senate and people1 and fully established in his violent authority by subduing ,niger and ,albinus4 8,inter hc ,gordianus ,csar10 says ,capitolinus1 speaking of another period1 8sublatus a militibus1 ,imperator1 est appellatus1 quia non erat alius in prsenti40 ,it is to be remarked that ,gordian was a boy of fourteen years of age4 ,frequent instances of a like nature occur in the history of the emperors2 in that of ,alexander's successors1 and of many other countries4 ,nor can anything be more unhappy than a despotic government of that kind1 where the succession is disjointed and irregular1 and must be determined on every occasion by force or election4 ,in a free government the matter is often unavoidable1 and is also much less dangerous4 ,the interests of liberty may there frequently lead the people in their own defence to alter the succession of the crown1 and the constitution being compounded of parts1 may still maintain a sufficient stability by resting on the aristocratical or democratical members1 though the monarchical be altered from time to time in order to accommodate it to the former4 ,in an absolute government when there is no legal prince who has a title to the throne1 it may safely be determined to belong to the first occupier4 ,instances of this kind are but too frequent1 especially in the ,eastern monarchies4 ,when any race of princes expires the will or destination of the last sovereign will be regarded as a title4 ,thus the edict of ,louis ,,xiv41 who called the bastard princes to the succession in case of the failure of all the legitimate princes1 would1 in such an event1 have some authority4#ajd ,thus the will of ,charles ,,ii4 disposed of the whole ,spanish monarchy4 ,the cession of the ancient proprietor1 especially when joined to conquest1 is likewise esteemed a very good title4 ,the general bond of obligation which unites us to government is the interest and necessities of society1 and this obligation is very strong4 ,the determination of it to this or that particular prince or form of government is frequently more uncertain and dubious4 ,present possession has considerable authority in these cases1 and greater than in private property1 because of the disorders which attend all revolutions and changes of government4#aje ,we shall only observe1 before we conclude1 that though an appeal to general opinion may justly1 in the speculative sciences of metaphysics1 natural philosophy1 or astronomy1 be esteemed unfair and inconclusive1 yet in all questions with regard to morals1 as well as criticism1 there is really no standard by which any controversy can ever be decided4 ,and nothing is a clearer proof that a theory of this kind is erroneous than to find that it leads to paradoxes which are repugnant to the common sentiments of mankind and to general practice and opinion4 ,the doctrine which founds all lawful government on an original contract1 or consent of the people1 is plainly of this kind2 nor has the ablest of its partisans in prosecution of it scrupled to affirm that absolute monarchy is inconsistent with civil society1 and so can be no form of civil government at all1#ajf and that the supreme power in a state cannot take from any man by taxes and impositions any part of his property without his own consent or that of his representatives4#ajg ,what authority any moral reasoning can have which leads to opinions so wide of the general practice of mankind in every place but this single kingdom it is easy to determine4#ajh ,,notes1 ,,of ,,the ,,original ,,contract4 #ajc ,henry ,,iv4 of ,france4 #ajd ,it is remarkable that in the remonstrance of the ,duke of ,bourbon and the legitimate princes against this destination of ,louis ,,xiv41 the doctrine of the original contract is insisted on1 even in that absolute government4 ,the ,french nation1 say they1 choosing ,hugh ,capet and his posterity to rule over them and their posterity1 where the former line fails1 there is a tacit right reserved to choose a new royal family2 and this right is invaded by calling the bastard princes to the throne without the consent of the nation4 ,but the ,comte de ,boulainvilliers1 who wrote in defence of the bastard princes1 ridicules this notion of an original contract1 especially when applied to ,hugh ,capet2 who mounted the throne1 says he1 by the same arts which have ever been employed by all conquerors and usurpers4 ,he got his title1 indeed1 recognized by the states after he had put himself in possession4 ,but is this a choice or contract8 ,the ,comte de ,boulainvilliers1 we may observe1 was a noted republican2 but being a man of learning1 and very conversant in history1 he knew the people were never almost consulted in these revolutions and new establishments1 and that time alone bestowed right and authority on what was commonly at first founded on force and violence4 7,see tat de la ,france1 vol4 iii47 #aje ,the crime of rebellion amongst the ancients was commonly marked by the terms 1 novas res moliri4 #ajf ,see ,locke on ,government1 chap4 #g1 #ij4 #ajg ,locke on ,government1 chap4 #aa1 #ach1 #aci1 #adj4 #ajh ,the only passage ,i meet with in antiquity where the obligation of obedience to government is ascribed to a promise is in ,plato--in ,critone1 where ,socrates refuses to escape from prison1 because he had tacitly promised to obey the laws4 ,thus he builds a ,tory consequence of passive obedience on a ,whig foundation of the original contract4 ,new discoveries are not to be expected in these matters4 ,if no man1 till very lately1 ever imagined that government was founded on contract1 it is certain it cannot1 in general1 have any such foundation4 ,,of ,,passive ,,obedience4 ,in the former essay we endeavoured to refute the speculative systems of politics advanced in this nation1 as well the religious system of the one party as the philosophical of the other4 ,we come now to examine the practical consequences deduced by each party with regard to the measures of submission due to sovereigns4 ,as the obligation to justice is founded entirely on the interests of society1 which require mutual abstinence from property1 in order to preserve peace among mankind1 it is evident that1 when the execution of justice would be attended with very pernicious consequences1 that virtue must be suspended1 and give place to public utility in such extraordinary and such pressing emergencies4 ,the maxim1 fiat ,justitia1 ruat ,clum 7let justice be performed though the universe be destroyed71 is apparently false1 and by sacrificing the end to the means shows a preposterous idea of the subordination of duties4 ,what governor of a town makes any scruple of burning the suburbs when they facilitate the advances of the enemy8 ,or what general abstains from plundering a neutral country when the necessities of war require it1 and he cannot otherwise maintain his army8 ,the case is the same with the duty of allegiance2 and common sense teaches us1 that as government binds us to obedience only on account of its tendency to public utility1 that duty must always1 in extraordinary cases1 when public ruin would evidently attend obedience1 yield to the primary and original obligation4 ,salus populi suprema ,lex 7the safety of the people is the supreme law74 ,this maxim is agreeable to the sentiments of mankind in all ages2 nor is any one1 when he reads of the insurrections against a ,nero1 or a ,philip1 so infatuated with party-systems as not to wish success to the enterprise and praise the undertakers4 ,even our high monarchical party1 in spite of their sublime theory1 are forced in such cases to judge and feel and approve in conformity to the rest of mankind4 ,resistance1 therefore1 being admitted in extraordinary emergencies1 the question can only be among good reasoners with regard to the degree of necessity which can justify resistance and render it lawful or commendable4 ,and here ,i must confess that ,i shall always incline to their side who draw the bond of allegiance the closest possible1 and consider an infringement of it as the last refuge in desperate cases when the public is in the highest danger from violence and tyranny2 for besides the mischiefs of a civil war1 which commonly attends insurrection1 it is certain that where a disposition to rebellion appears among any people it is one chief cause of tyranny in the rulers1 and forces them into many violent measures which they never would have embraced had every one seemed inclined to submission and obedience4 ,it is thus the tyrannicide or assassination1 approved of by ancient maxims1 instead of keeping tyrants and usurpers in awe1 made them ten times more fierce and unrelenting2 and is now justly1 upon that account1 abolished by the laws of nations1 and universally condemned as a base and treacherous method of bringing to justice these disturbers of society4 ,besides1 we must consider that1 as obedience is our duty in the common course of things1 it ought chiefly to be inculcated2 nor can anything be more preposterous than an anxious care and solicitude in stating all the cases in which resistance may be allowed4 ,thus1 though a philosopher reasonably acknowledges in the course of an argument that the rules of justice may be dispensed with in cases of urgent necessity1 what should we think of a preacher or casuist who should make it his chief study to find out such cases and enforce them with all the vehemence of argument and eloquence8 ,would he not be better employed in inculcating the general doctrine than in displaying the particular exceptions1 which we are1 perhaps1 but too much inclined of ourselves to embrace and extend8 ,there are1 however1 two reasons which may be pleaded in defence of that party among us who have1 with so much industry1 propagated the maxims of resistance--maxims which1 it must be confessed1 are in general so pernicious and so destructive of civil society4 ,the first is that their antagonists carrying the doctrine of obedience to such an extravagant height as not only never to mention the exceptions in extraordinary cases 7which might perhaps be excusable71 but even positively to exclude them1 it became necessary to insist on these exceptions1 and defend the rights of injured truth and liberty4 ,the second and perhaps better reason is founded on the nature of the ,british constitution and form of government4 ,it is almost peculiar to our constitution to establish a first magistrate with such high pre-eminence and dignity that1 though limited by the laws1 he is in a manner1 so far as regards his own person1 above the laws1 and can neither be questioned nor punished for any injury or wrong which may be committed by him4 ,his ministers alone1 or those who act by his commission1 are obnoxious to justice2 and while the prince is thus allured by the prospect of personal safety to give the laws their free course1 an equal security is in effect obtained by the punishment of lesser offenders1 and at the same time a civil war is avoided1 which would be the infallible consequence were an attack at every turn made directly upon the sovereign4 ,but though the constitution pays this salutary compliment to the prince1 it can never reasonably be understood by that maxim to have determined its own destruction1 or to have established a tame submission where he protects his ministers1 perseveres in injustice1 and usurps the whole power of the commonwealth4 ,this case1 indeed1 is never expressly put by the laws1 because it is impossible for them in their ordinary course to provide a remedy for it1 or establish any magistrate with superior authority to chastise the exorbitancies of the prince4 ,but as a right without remedy would be the greatest of all absurdities1 the remedy in this case is the extraordinary one of resistance1 when affairs come to that extremity that the constitution can be defended by it alone4 ,resistance1 therefore1 must of course become more frequent in the ,british ,government than in others which are simpler and consist of fewer parts and movements4 ,where the king is an absolute sovereign1 he has little temptation to commit such enormous tyranny as may justly provoke rebellion2 but where he is limited1 his imprudent ambition1 without any great vices1 may run him into that perilous situation4 ,this is commonly supposed to have been the case with ,charles ,i41 and if we may now speak truth1 after animosities are laid1 this was also the case with ,james ,,ii4 ,these were harmless1 if not1 in their private character1 good men2 but mistaking the nature of our constitution1 and engrossing the whole legislative power1 it became necessary to oppose them with some vehemence1 and even to deprive the latter formally of that authority which he had used with such imprudence and indiscretion4 ,,of ,,the ,,coalition ,,of ,,parties4 ,to abolish all distinctions of party may not be practicable1 perhaps not desirable1 in a free government4 ,the only parties which are dangerous are such as entertain opposite views with regard to the essentials of government1 the succession of the crown1 or the more considerable privileges belonging to the several members of the constitution2 where there is no room for any compromise or accommodation1 and where the controversy may appear so momentous as to justify even an opposition by arms to the pretensions of antagonists4 ,of this nature was the animosity continued for above a century between the parties in ,england--an animosity which broke out sometimes into civil war1 which occasioned violent revolutions1 and which continually endangered the peace and tranquillity of the nation4 ,but as there has appeared of late the strongest symptoms of a universal desire to abolish these party distinctions1 this tendency to a coalition affords the most agreeable prospect of future happiness1 and ought to be carefully cherished and promoted by every lover of his country4 ,there is not a more effectual method of promoting so good an end than to prevent all unreasonable insult and triumph of the one party over the other1 to encourage moderate opinions1 to find the proper medium in all disputes1 to persuade each that its antagonist may possibly be sometimes in the right1 and to keep a balance in the praise and blame which we bestow on either side4 ,the two former essays1 concerning the original contract and passive obedience1 are calculated for this purpose with regard to the philosophical controversies between the parties1 and tend to show that neither side are in these respects so fully supported by reason as they endeavour to flatter themselves4 ,we shall proceed to exercise the same moderation with regard to the historical disputes1 by proving that each party was justified by plausible topics1 that there were on both sides wise men who meant well to their country1 and that the past animosity between the factions had no better foundation than narrow prejudice or interested passion4 ,the popular party1 who afterwards acquired the name of ,whigs1 might justify by very specious arguments that opposition to the crown1 from which our present free constitution is derived4 ,though obliged to acknowledge that precedents in favour of prerogative had uniformly taken place during many reigns before ,charles ,i41 they thought that there was no reason for submitting any longer to so dangerous an authority4 ,such might have been their reasoning4 ,the rights of mankind are so sacred that no prescription of tyranny or arbitrary power can have authority sufficient to abolish them4 ,liberty is the most inestimable of all blessings1 and wherever there appears any probability of recovering it1 a nation may willingly run many hazards1 and ought not even to repine at the greatest effusion of blood or dissipation of treasure4 ,all human institutions1 and none more than government1 are in continual fluctuation4 ,kings are sure to embrace every opportunity of extending their prerogatives1 and if favourable incidents be not also laid hold of to extend and secure the privileges of the people1 a universal despotism must for ever prevail among mankind4 ,the example of all the neighbouring nations proves that it is no longer safe to entrust with the crown the same exorbitant prerogatives which had formerly been exercised during rude and simple ages4 ,and though the example of many late reigns may be pleaded in favour of a power in the prince somewhat arbitrary1 more remote reigns afford instances of stricter limitations imposed on the crown1 and those pretensions of the ,parliament1 now branded with the title of innovations1 are only a recovery of the just rights of the people4 ,these views1 far from being odious1 are surely large and generous and noble4 ,to their prevalence and success the kingdom owes its liberty1 perhaps its learning1 its industry1 commerce1 and naval power4 ,by them chiefly the ,english name is distinguished among the society of nations1 and aspires to a rivalship with that of the freest and most illustrious commonwealths of antiquity4 ,but as all these mighty consequences could not reasonably be foreseen at the time when the contest began1 the royalists of that age wanted not specious arguments on their side1 by which they could justify their defence of the then established prerogatives of the crown4 ,we shall state the question1 as it might appear to them at the assembling of that ,parliament1 which by their violent encroachments on the crown1 began the civil wars4 ,the only rule of government1 they might have said1 known and acknowledged among men1 is use and practice4 ,reason is so uncertain a guide that it will always be exposed to doubt and controversy4 ,could it ever render itself prevalent over the people1 men had always retained it as their sole rule of conduct2 they had still continued in the primitive1 unconnected state of nature1 without submitting to political government1 whose sole basis is not pure reason1 but authority and precedent4 ,dissolve these ties1 you break all the bonds of civil society1 and leave every man at liberty to consult his particular interest1 by those expedients which his appetite1 disguised under the appearance of reason1 shall dictate to him4 ,the spirit of innovation is in itself pernicious1 however favourable its particular object may sometimes appear4 ,a truth so obvious that the popular party themselves are sensible of it1 and therefore cover their encroachments on the crown by the plausible pretence of their recovering the ancient liberties of the people4 ,but the present prerogatives of the crown1 allowing all the suppositions of that party1 have been incontestably established ever since the accession of the house of ,tudor1 a period which1 as it now comprehends a hundred and sixty years1 may be allowed sufficient to give stability to any constitution4 ,would it not have appeared ridiculous in the reign of the ,emperor ,adrian to talk of the constitution of the republic as the rule of government1 or to suppose that the former rights of the senate and consuls and tribunes were still subsisting8 ,but the present claims of the ,english monarchs are infinitely more favourable than those of the ,roman emperors during that age4 ,the authority of ,augustus was a plain usurpation1 grounded only on military violence1 and forms such an era in the ,roman history as is obvious to every reader4 ,but if ,henry ,,vii4 really1 as some pretend1 enlarged the power of the crown1 it was only by insensible acquisitions which escaped the apprehension of the people1 and have scarcely been remarked even by historians and politicians4 ,the new government1 if it deserves the name1 is an imperceptible transition from the former2 is entirely engrafted on it2 derives its title fully from that root2 and is to be considered only as one of those gradual revolutions to which human affairs in every nation will be for ever subject4 ,the ,house of ,tudor1 and after them that of ,stuart1 exercised no prerogatives1 but what had been claimed and exercised by the ,plantagenets4 ,not a single branch of their authority can be said to be altogether an innovation4 ,the only difference is that perhaps the more ancient kings exerted these powers only by intervals1 and were not able1 by reason of the opposition of their barons1 to render them so steady a rule of administration4#aji ,but the sole inference from this fact is that those times were more turbulent and seditious1 and that the laws have happily of late gained the ascendant4 ,under what pretence can the popular party now talk of recovering the ancient constitution8 ,the former control over the kings was not placed in the commons1 but in the barons4 ,the people had no authority1 and even little or no liberty1 till the crown1 by suppressing these factious tyrants1 enforced the execution of the laws1 and obliged all the subjects equally to respect each other's rights1 privileges1 and properties4 ,if we must return to the ancient barbarous and ,gothic constitution1 let those gentlemen1 who now behave themselves with so much insolence to their sovereign1 set the first example4 ,let them make court to be admitted as retainers to a neighbouring baron1 and by submitting to slavery under him1 acquire some protection to themselves1 together with the power of exercising rapine and oppression over their inferior slaves and villains4 ,this was the condition of the commons among their remote ancestors4 ,but how far back shall we go1 in having recourse to ancient constitutions and governments8 ,there was a constitution still more ancient than that to which these innovators affect so much to appeal4 ,during that period there was no ,magna ,charta4 ,the barons themselves possessed few regular1 stated privileges1 and the ,house of ,commons probably had not an existence4 ,it is pleasant to hear a house1 while they are usurping the whole power of the government1 talk of reviving ancient institutions4 ,is it not known that1 though the representatives received wages from their constituents1 to be a member of their house was always considered as a burden1 and a freedom from it as a privilege8 ,will they persuade us that power1 which of all human acquisitions is the most coveted1 and in comparison of which even reputation and pleasure and riches are slighted1 could ever be regarded as a burden by any man8 ,the property acquired of late by the commons1 it is said1 entitles them to more power than their ancestors enjoyed4 ,but to what is this increase of their property owing1 but to an increase of their liberty and their security8 ,let them therefore acknowledge that their ancestors1 while the crown was restrained by the seditious barons1 really enjoyed less liberty than they themselves have attained1 after the sovereign acquired the ascendant1 and let them enjoy that liberty with moderation1 and not forfeit it by new exorbitant claims1 and by rendering it a pretence for endless innovations4 ,the true rule of government is the present established practice of the age4 ,that has most authority1 because it is recent4 ,it is also better known for the same reason4 ,who has assured those tribunes that the ,plantagenets did not exercise as high acts of authority as the ,tudors8 ,the historians1 they say1 do not mention them2 but the historians are also silent with regard to the chief exertions of prerogative by the ,tudors4 ,where any power or prerogative is fully and undoubtedly established1 the exercise of it passes for a thing of course1 and readily escapes the notice of history and annals4 ,had we no other monuments of ,elizabeth's reign than what are preserved even by ,camden1 the most copious1 judicious1 and exact of our historians1 we should be entirely ignorant of the most important maxims of her government4 ,was not the present monarchical government to its full extent authorized by lawyers1 recommended by divines1 acknowledged by politicians1 acquiesced in--nay1 passionately cherished--by the people in general2 and all this during a period of at least a hundred and sixty years1 and till of late1 without the least murmur or controversy8 ,this general consent surely1 during so long a time1 must be sufficient to render a constitution legal and valid4 ,if the origin of all power be derived1 as is pretended1 from the people1 here is their consent in the fullest and most ample terms that can be desired or imagined4 ,but the people must not pretend1 because they can1 by their consent1 lay the foundations of government1 that therefore they are to be permitted1 at their pleasure1 to overthrow and subvert them4 ,there is no end of these seditious and arrogant claims4 ,the power of the crown is now openly struck at2 the nobility are also in visible peril2 the gentry will soon follow2 the popular leaders1 who will then assume the name of gentry1 will next be exposed to danger2 and the people themselves1 having become incapable of civil government1 and lying under the restraint of no authority1 must1 for the sake of peace1 admit1 instead of their legal and mild monarchs1 a succession of military and despotic tyrants4 ,these consequences are the more to be dreaded1 as the present fury of the people1 though glossed over by pretensions to civil liberty1 is in reality incited by the fanaticism of religion1 a principle the most blind1 headstrong1 and ungovernable by which human nature can ever possibly be actuated4 ,popular rage is dreadful1 from whatever motive derived1 but must be attended with the most pernicious consequences when it arises from a principle which disclaims all control by human law1 reason1 or authority4 ,these are the arguments which each party may make use of to justify the conduct of their predecessors during that great crisis4 ,the event has shown that the reasonings of the popular party were better founded2 but perhaps1 according to the established maxims of lawyers and politicians1 the views of the royalists ought beforehand to have appeared more solid1 more safe1 and more legal4 ,but this is certain1 that the greater moderation we now employ in representing past events1 the nearer we shall be to produce a full coalition of the parties and an entire acquiescence in our present happy establishment4 ,moderation is of advantage to every establishment2 nothing but zeal can overturn a settled power1 and an over-active zeal in friends is apt to beget a like spirit in antagonists4 ,the transition from a moderate opposition against an establishment to an entire acquiescence in it is easy and insensible4 ,there are many invincible arguments which should induce the malcontent party to acquiesce entirely in the present settlement of the constitution4 ,they now find that the spirit of civil liberty1 though at first connected with religious fanaticism1 could purge itself from that pollution1 and appear under a more genuine and engaging aspect--a friend to toleration1 and an encourager of all the enlarged and generous sentiments that do honour to human nature4 ,they may observe that the popular claims could stop at a proper period1 and after retrenching the exorbitant prerogatives of the crown1 could still maintain a due respect to monarchy1 to nobility1 and to all ancient institutions4 ,above all1 they must be sensible that the very principle which made the strength of their party1 and from which it derived its chief authority1 has now deserted them and gone over to their antagonists4 ,the plan of liberty is settled1 its happy effects are proved by experience1 a long tract of time has given it stability1 and whoever would attempt to overturn it1 and to recall the past government or abdicated family1 would1 besides other more criminal imputations1 be exposed in their turn to the reproach of faction and innovation4 ,while they peruse the history of past events1 they ought to reflect1 both that the rights of the crown are long since annihilated1 and that the tyranny and violence and oppression to which they often gave rise are ills from which the established liberty of the constitution has now at last happily protected the people4 ,these reflections will prove a better security to our freedom and privileges than to deny1 contrary to the clearest evidence of facts1 that such regal powers ever had any existence4 ,there is not a more effectual method of betraying a cause than to lay the strength of the argument on a wrong place1 and by disputing an untenable post inure the adversaries to success and victory4 ,,note1 ,,of ,,the ,,coalition ,,of ,,parties4 #aji ,the author believes that he was the first writer who advanced that the family of ,tudor possessed in general more authority than their immediate predecessors--an opinion which1 he hopes1 will be supported by history1 but which he proposes with some diffidence4 ,there are strong symptoms of arbitrary power in some former reigns1 even after signing of the charters4 ,the power of the crown in that age depended less on the constitution than on the capacity and vigour of the prince who wore it4 ,,of ,,the ,,protestant ,,succession4 ,i suppose that a member of ,parliament in the reign of ,king ,william or ,queen ,anne1 while the establishment of the ,protestant ,succession was yet uncertain1 were deliberating concerning the party he would choose in that important question1 and weighing with impartiality the advantages and disadvantages on each side4 ,i believe the following particulars would have entered into his consideration4 ,he would easily perceive the great advantages resulting from the restoration of the ,stuart family1 by which we should preserve the succession clear and undisputed1 free from a pretender1 with such a specious title as that of blood1 which with the multitude is always the claim the strongest and most easily comprehended4 ,it is in vain to say1 as many have done1 that the question with regard to governors1 independent of government1 is frivolous and little worth disputing1 much less fighting about4 ,the generality of mankind never will enter into these sentiments2 and it is much happier1 ,i believe1 for society that they do not1 but rather continue in their natural prejudices and prepossessions4 ,how could stability be preserved in any monarchical government 7which1 though perhaps not the best1 is1 and always has been1 the most common of any7 unless men had so passionate a regard for the true heir of their royal family1 and even though he be weak in understanding1 or infirm in years1 gave him so great a preference above persons the most accomplished in shining talents or celebrated for great achievements8 ,would not every popular leader put in his claim at every vacancy1 or even without any vacancy1 and the kingdom become the theatre of perpetual wars and convulsions8 ,the condition of the ,roman ,empire surely was not in this respect much to be envied1 nor is that of the ,eastern nations1 who pay little regard to the title of their sovereigns1 but sacrifice them every day to the caprice or momentary humour of the populace or soldiery4 ,it is but a foolish wisdom which is so carefully displayed in under-valuing princes and placing them on a level with the meanest of mankind4 ,to be sure1 an anatomist finds no more in the greatest monarch than in the lowest peasant or day-labourer1 and a moralist may perhaps frequently find less4 ,but what do all these reflections tend to8 ,we all of us still retain these prejudices in favour of birth and family1 and neither in our serious occupations nor most careless amusements can we ever get entirely rid of them4 ,a tragedy that should represent the adventures of sailors or porters1 or even of private gentlemen1 would presently disgust us2 but one that introduces kings and princes acquires in our eyes an air of importance and dignity4 ,or should a man be able1 by his superior wisdom1 to get entirely above such prepossessions1 he would soon1 by means of the same wisdom1 again bring himself down to them for the sake of society1 whose welfare he would perceive to be intimately connected with them4 ,far from endeavouring to undeceive the people in this particular1 he would cherish such sentiments of reverence to their princes as requisite to preserve a due subordination in society4 ,and though the lives of twenty thousand men be often sacrificed to maintain a king in possession of his throne1 or preserve the right of succession undisturbed1 he entertains no indignation at the loss on pretence that every individual was perhaps in himself as valuable as the prince he served4 ,he considers the consequences of violating the hereditary right of kings--consequences which may be felt for many centuries2 while the loss of several thousand men brings so little prejudice to a large kingdom that it may not be perceived a few years afterwards4 ,the advantages of the ,hanover succession are of an opposite nature1 and arise from this very circumstance1 that it violates hereditary right1 and places on the throne a prince to whom birth gave no title to that dignity4 ,it is evident to any one who considers the history of this island that the privileges of the people have during the last two centuries been continually upon the increase1 by the division of the church-lands1 by the alienations of the barons' estates1 by the progress of trade1 and above all by the happiness of our situation1 which for a long time gave us sufficient security without any standing army or military establishment4 ,on the contrary1 public liberty has1 almost in every other nation of ,europe1 been during the same period extremely upon the decline1 while the people were disgusted at the hardships of the old feudal militia1 and chose rather to entrust their prince with mercenary armies1 which he easily turned against themselves4 ,it was nothing extraordinary1 therefore1 that some of our ,british sovereigns mistook the nature of the constitution and genius of the people2 and as they embraced all the favourable precedents left them by their ancestors1 they overlooked all those which were contrary1 and which supposed a limitation in our government4 ,they were encouraged in this mistake by the example of all the neighbouring princes1 who1 bearing the same title or appellation1 and being adorned with the same ensigns of authority1 naturally led them to claim the same powers and prerogatives4#aaj ,the flattery of courtiers further blinded them1 and above all that of the clergy1 who from several passages of ,scripture1 and these wrested too1 had erected a regular and avowed system of tyranny and despotic power4 ,the only method of destroying at once all these exorbitant claims and pretensions was to depart from the true hereditary line1 and choose a prince who1 being plainly a creature of the public1 and receiving the crown on conditions1 expressed and avowed1 found his authority established on the same bottom with the privileges of the people4 ,by electing him in the royal line we cut off all hopes of ambitious subjects who might in future emergencies disturb the government by their cabals and pretensions2 by rendering the crown hereditary in his family we avoided all the inconveniences of elective monarchy2 and by excluding the lineal heir we secured all our constitutional limitations1 and rendered our government uniform and of a piece4 ,the people cherish monarchy because protected by it1 the monarch favours liberty because created by it4 ,and thus every advantage is obtained by the new establishment1 as far as human skill and wisdom can extend itself4 ,these are the separate advantages of fixing the succession1 either in the house of ,stuart or in that of ,hanover4 ,there are also disadvantages on each establishment1 which an impartial patriot would ponder and examine1 in order to form a just judgment upon the whole4 ,the disadvantages of the ,protestant ,succession consist in the foreign dominions which are possessed by the princes of the ,hanover line1 and which it might be supposed would engage us in the intrigues and wars of the ,continent1 and lose us in some measure the inestimable advantage we possess of being surrounded and guarded by the sea which we command4 ,the disadvantages of recalling the abdicated family consist chiefly in their religion1 which is more prejudicial to society than that established among us is contrary to it1 and affords no toleration1 or peace1 or security to any other religion4 ,it appears to me that all these advantages and disadvantages are allowed on both sides2 at least1 by every one who is at all susceptible of argument or reasoning4 ,no subject1 however loyal1 pretends to deny that the disputed title and foreign dominions of the present royal family are a loss2 nor is there any partisan of the ,stuart family but will confess that the claim of hereditary1 indefeasible right1 and the ,roman ,catholic religion1 are also disadvantages in that family4 ,it belongs1 therefore1 to a philosopher alone1 who is of neither party1 to put all these circumstances in the scale and to assign to each of them its proper poise and influence4 ,such a one will readily1 at first1 acknowledge that all political questions are infinitely complicated1 and that there scarce ever occurs in any deliberation a choice which is either purely good or purely ill4 ,consequences1 mixed and varied1 may be foreseen to flow from every measure--and many consequences unforeseen do always1 in fact1 result from it4 ,hesitation1 and reserve1 and suspense are therefore the only sentiment he brings to this essay or trial2 or if he indulges any passion it is that of derision and ridicule against the ignorant multitude1 who are always clamorous and dogmatical even in the nicest questions1 of which1 from want of temper1 perhaps still more than of understanding1 they are altogether unfit judges4 ,but to say something more determinate on this head1 the following reflections will1 ,i hope1 show the temper1 if not the understanding of a philosopher4 ,were we to judge merely by first appearances and by past experience1 we must allow that the advantages of a parliamentary title of the house of ,hanover are much greater than those of an undisputed hereditary title in the house of ,stuart1 and that our fathers acted wisely in preferring the former to the latter4 ,so long as the house of ,stuart reigned in ,britain1 which1 with some interruption1 was above eighty years1 the government was kept in a continual fever by the contentions between the privileges of the people and the prerogatives of the crown4 ,if arms were dropped1 the noise of disputes continued2 or1 if these were silenced1 jealousy still corroded the heart1 and threw the nation into an unnatural ferment and disorder4 ,and while we were thus occupied in domestic contentions1 a foreign power1 dangerous1 if not fatal1 to public liberty1 erected itself in ,europe without any opposition from us1 and even sometimes with our assistance4 ,but during these last sixty years1 when a parliamentary establishment has taken place1 whatever factions may have prevailed either among the people or in public assemblies1 the whole force of our constitution has always fallen to one side1 and an uninterrupted harmony has been preserved between our princes and our parliaments4 ,public liberty1 with internal peace and order1 has flourished almost without interruption2 trade and manufactures and agriculture have increased2 the arts and sciences and philosophy have been cultivated4 ,even religious parties have been necessitated to lay aside their mutual rancour1 and the glory of the nation has spread itself all over ,europe2 while we stand the bulwark against oppression1 and the great antagonist of that power which threatens every people with conquest and subjection4 ,so long and so glorious a period no nation almost can boast of2 nor is there another instance in the whole history of mankind that so many millions of people have during such a space of time been held together in a manner so free1 so rational1 and so suitable to the dignity of human nature4 ,but though this recent instance seems clearly to decide in favour of the present establishment1 there are some circumstances to be thrown into the other scale1 and it is dangerous to regulate our judgment by one event or example4 ,we have had two rebellions during the flourishing period above mentioned1 besides plots and conspiracies without number2 and1 if none of these have produced any very fatal event1 we may ascribe our escape chiefly to the narrow genius of those princes who disputed our establishment1 and may esteem ourselves so far fortunate4 ,but the claims of the banished family1 ,i fear1 are not yet antiquated1 and who can foretell that their future attempts will produce no greater disorder8 ,the disputes between privilege and prerogative may easily be composed by laws1 and votes1 and conferences1 and concessions1 where there is tolerable temper or prudence on both sides1 or on either side4 ,among contending titles the question can only be determined by the sword1 and by devastation1 and by civil war4 ,a prince who fills the throne with a disputed title dares not arm his subjects1 the only method of securing a people fully1 both against domestic oppression and foreign conquest4 ,notwithstanding all our riches and renown1 what a critical escape did we lately make from dangers1 which were owing1 not so much to bad conduct and ill success in war1 as to the pernicious practice of mortgaging our finances1 and the still more pernicious maxim of never paying off our encumbrances8 ,such fatal measures could never have been embraced had it not been to secure a precarious establishment4#aaa ,but to convince us that an hereditary title is to be embraced rather than a parliamentary one1 which is not supported by any other views or motives1 a man needs only transport himself back to the era of the ,restoration1 and suppose that he had had a seat in that ,parliament which recalled the royal family1 and put a period to the greatest disorders that ever arose from the opposite pretensions of prince and people4 ,what would have been thought of one that had proposed at that time to set aside ,charles ,,ii4 and settle the crown on the ,duke of ,york or ,gloucester1 merely in order to exclude all high claims like those of their father and grandfather8 ,would not such a one have been regarded as a very extravagant projector1 who loved dangerous remedies1 and could tamper and play with a government and national constitution like a quack with a sickly patient8 ,the advantages which result from a parliamentary title1 preferably to an hereditary one1 though they are great1 are too refined ever to enter into the conception of the vulgar4 ,the bulk of mankind would never allow them to be sufficient for committing what would be regarded as an injustice to the prince4 ,they must be supported by some gross1 popular1 and familiar topics2 and wise men1 though convinced of their force1 would reject them in compliance with the weakness and prejudices of the people4 ,an encroaching tyrant or deluded bigot alone1 by his misconduct1 is able to enrage the nation and render practicable what was always perhaps desirable4 ,in reality1 the reason assigned by the nation for excluding the race of ,stuart1 and so many other branches of the royal family1 is not on account of their hereditary title 7which1 however just in itself1 would1 to vulgar apprehensions1 have appeared altogether absurd71 but on account of their religion1 which leads us to compare the disadvantages above mentioned of each establishment4 ,i confess that1 considering the matter in general1 it were much to be wished that our prince had no foreign dominions1 and could confine all his attention to the government of this island4 ,for1 not to mention some real inconveniences that may result from territories on the ,continent1 they afford such a handle for calumny and defamation as is greedily seized by the people1 who are always disposed to think ill of their superiors4 ,it must1 however1 be acknowledged that ,hanover is perhaps the spot of ground in ,europe the least inconvenient for a ,king of ,britain4 ,it lies in the heart of ,germany1 at a distance from the ,great ,powers which are our natural rivals2 it is protected by the laws of the ,empire as well as by the arms of its own sovereign1 and it serves only to connect us more closely with the house of ,austria1 which is our natural ally4 ,in the last war it has been of service to us1 by furnishing us with a considerable body of auxiliary troops1 the bravest and most faithful in the world4 ,the ,elector of ,hanover is the only considerable prince in the ,empire who has pursued no separate end1 and has raised up no stale pretensions during the late commotions of ,europe1 but has acted all along with the dignity of a ,king of ,britain4 ,and ever since the accession of that family it would be difficult to show any harm we have ever received from the electoral dominions1 except that short disgust in #agah1 with ,charles ,,xii41 who1 regulating himself by maxims very different from those of other princes1 made a personal quarrel of every public injury4#aab ,the religious persuasion of the house of ,stuart is an inconvenience of a much deeper dye1 and would threaten us with much more dismal consequences4 ,the ,roman ,catholic religion1 with its huge train of priests and friars1 is vastly more expensive than ours4 ,even though unaccompanied with its natural attendants of inquisitors1 and stakes1 and gibbets1 it is less tolerating2 and not contented with dividing the sacerdotal from the regal office 7which must be prejudicial to any state71 it bestows the former on a foreigner1 who has always a separate1 and may often have an opposite interest to that of the public4 ,but were this religion ever so advantageous to society1 it is contrary to that which is established among us1 and which is likely to keep possession for a long time of the minds of the people2 and though it is much to be hoped that the progress of reason and philosophy will1 by degrees1 abate the virulent acrimony of opposite religions all over ,europe1 yet the spirit of moderation has as yet made too slow advances to be entirely trusted4 ,the conduct of the ,saxon family1 where the same person can be a ,catholic ,king and ,protestant ,elector1 is perhaps the first instance in modern times of so reasonable and prudent a behaviour4 ,and the gradual progress of the ,catholic superstition does1 even there1 prognosticate a speedy alteration2 after which it is justly to be apprehended that the persecutions will put a speedy period to the ,protestant religion in the place of its nativity4 ,thus1 upon the whole1 the advantages of the settlement in the family of ,stuart1 which frees us from a disputed title1 seem to bear some proportion with those of the settlement in the family of ,hanover1 which frees us from the claims of prerogative2 but at the same time its disadvantages1 by placing on the throne a ,roman ,catholic1 are much greater than those of the other establishment1 in settling the crown on a foreign prince4 ,what party an impartial patriot1 in the reign of ,king ,william or ,queen ,anne1 would have chosen amidst these opposite views may perhaps to some appear hard to determine4 ,for my part1 ,i esteem liberty so invaluable a blessing in society1 that whatever favours its progress and security can scarce be too fondly cherished by every one who is a lover of humankind4 ,but the settlement in the house of ,hanover has actually taken place4 ,the princes of that family1 without intrigue1 without cabal1 without solicitation on their part1 have been called to mount our throne by the united voice of the whole legislative body4 ,they have1 since their accession1 displayed in all their actions the utmost mildness1 equity1 and regard to the laws and constitution4 ,our own ministers1 our own parliaments1 ourselves have governed us1 and if aught ill has befallen us we can only blame fortune or ourselves4 ,what a reproach must we become among nations if1 disgusted with a settlement so deliberately made1 and whose conditions have been so religiously observed1 we should throw everything again into confusion1 and by our levity and rebellious disposition prove ourselves totally unfit for any state but that of absolute slavery and subjection8 ,the greatest inconvenience attending a disputed title is that it brings us in danger of civil wars and rebellions4 ,what wise man1 to avoid this inconvenience1 would run directly upon a civil war and rebellion8 ,not to mention that so long possession1 secured by so many laws1 must ere this time1 in the apprehension of a great part of the nation1 have begot a title in the house of ,hanover independent of their present possession1 so that now we should not1 even by a revolution1 obtain the end of avoiding a disputed title4 ,no revolution made by national forces will ever be able1 without some other great necessity1 to abolish our debts and encumbrances1 in which the interest of so many persons is concerned4 ,and a revolution made by foreign forces is a conquest--a calamity with which the precarious balance of power threatens us1 and which our civil dissensions are likely1 above all other circumstances1 to bring upon us4 ,,notes1 ,,of ,,the ,,protestant ,,succession4 #aaj ,it appears from the speeches and proclamations and whole train of ,king ,james ,i4's actions1 as well as his son's1 that they considered the ,english government as a simple monarchy1 and never imagined that any considerable part of their subjects entertained a contrary idea4 ,this made them discover their pretensions without preparing any force to support them1 and even without reserve or disguise1 which are always employed by those who enter upon any new project1 or endeavour to innovate in any government4 ,king ,james told his ,parliament plainly1 when they meddled in ,state affairs1 8,ne sutor ultra crepidam40 ,he used also at his table1 in promiscuous companies1 to advance his notions in a manner still more undignified1 as we may learn from a story told in the life of ,mr4 ,waller1 and which that poet used frequently to repeat4 ,when ,mr4 ,waller was young1 he had the curiosity to go to court2 and he stood in the circle and saw ,king ,james dine where1 amongst other company1 there sat at table two bishops4 ,the ,king1 openly and aloud1 proposed this question3 8,whether he might not take his subjects' money1 when he had occasion for it1 without all this formality of ,parliament80 ,the one bishop readily replied1 8,god forbid you should not1 for you are the breath of our nostrils40 ,the other bishop declined answering1 and said he was not skilled in ,parliamentary cases2 but upon the ,king's urging him1 and saying he would admit of no evasion1 his lordship replied very pleasantly1 8,why1 then1 ,i think your ,majesty may lawfully take my brother's money1 for he offers it40 ,in ,sir ,walter ,raleigh's preface to the ,history of the ,world there is this remarkable passage3 8,philip ,,ii41 by strong hand and main force1 attempted to make himself not only an absolute monarch over the ,netherlands1 like unto the kings and sovereigns of ,england and ,france1 but1 ,turk-like1 to tread under his feet all their natural and fundamental laws1 privileges and ancient rights40 ,spenser1 speaking of some grants of the ,english kings to the ,irish corporations1 says3 8,all which1 though at the time of their first grant they were tolerable1 and perhaps reasonable1 yet now are most unreasonable and inconvenient4 ,but all these will easily be cut off with the superior power of her ,majesty's prerogative1 against which her own grants are not to be pleaded or enforced40 7,state of ,ireland1 p4 #aecg1 edit4 #agjf47 ,as these were very common1 if not perhaps the universal notions of the times1 the two first princes of the house of ,stuart were the more excusable for their mistake4 ,and ,rapin1 suitable to his usual malignity and partiality1 seems to treat them with too much severity upon account of it4 #aaa ,those who consider how universal this pernicious practice of funding has become all over ,europe may perhaps dispute this last opinion1 but we lay under less necessity than other ,states4 #aab ,this was published in the year #ageb4 ,,idea ,,of ,a ,,perfect ,,commonwealth4 ,of all mankind there are none so pernicious as political projectors1 if they have power1 nor so ridiculous if they want it2 as1 on the other hand1 a wise politician is the most beneficial character in nature if accompanied with authority2 and the most innocent1 and not altogether useless1 even if deprived of it4 ,it is not with forms of government as with other artificial contrivances1 where an old engine may be rejected1 if we can discover another more accurate and commodious1 or where trials may safely be made1 even though the success be doubtful4 ,an established government has an infinite advantage1 by that very circumstance of its being established2 the bulk of mankind being governed by authority1 not reason1 and never attributing authority to anything that has not the recommendation of antiquity4 ,to tamper1 therefore1 in this affair1 or try projects merely upon the credit of supposed argument and philosophy1 can never be the part of a wise magistrate1 who will bear a reverence to what carries the marks of age2 and though he may attempt some improvements for the public good1 yet will he adjust his innovations as much as possible to the ancient fabric1 and preserve entire the chief pillars and supports of the constitution4 ,the mathematicians in ,europe have been much divided concerning that figure of a ship which is the most commodious for sailing2 and ,huygens1 who at last determined this controversy1 is justly thought to have obliged the learned1 as well as commercial world2 though ,columbus had sailed to ,america1 and ,sir ,francis ,drake made the tour of the world1 without any such discovery4 ,as one form of government must be allowed more perfect than another1 independent of the manners and humours of particular men1 why may we not inquire what is the most perfect of all1 though the common botched and inaccurate governments seem to serve the purposes of society1 and though it be not so easy to establish a new government as to build a vessel upon a new plan8 ,the subject is surely the most worthy curiosity of any the wit of man can possibly devise4 ,and who knows1 if this controversy were fixed by the universal consent of the learned1 but in some future age an opportunity might be afforded of reducing the theory to practice1 either by a dissolution of the old governments1 or the combination of men to form a new one in some distant part of the world8 ,in all cases it must be advantageous to know what is most perfect in the kind1 that we may be able to bring any real constitution or form of government as near it as possible1 by such gentle alterations and innovations as may not give too great disturbance to society4 ,all ,i pretend to in the present essay is to revive this subject of speculation1 and therefore ,i shall deliver my sentiments in as few words as possible4 ,a long dissertation on that head would not1 ,i apprehend1 be very acceptable to the public1 who will be apt to regard such disquisitions both as useless and chimerical4 ,all plans of government which suppose great reformation in the manners of mankind are plainly imaginary4 ,of this nature are the ,republic of ,plato and the ,utopia of ,sir ,thomas ,more4 ,the ,oceana is the only valuable model of a commonwealth that has as yet been offered to the public4 ,the chief defects of the ,oceana seem to be these--,first1 its rotation is inconvenient1 by throwing men1 of whatever ability1 by intervals1 out of public employments4 ,secondly1 its ,agrarian is impracticable4 ,men will soon learn the art1 which was practised in ancient ,rome1 of concealing their possessions under other people's names1 till at last the abuse will become so common1 that they will throw off even the appearance of restraint4 ,thirdly1 the ,oceana provides not a sufficient security for liberty1 or the redress of grievances4 ,the senate must propose1 and the people consent2 by which means the senate have not only a negative upon the people1 but1 what is of infinitely greater consequence1 their negative goes before the votes of the people4 ,were the king's negative of the same nature in the ,english constitution1 and could he prevent any bill from coming into ,parliament1 he would be an absolute monarch4 ,as his negative follows the votes of the ,houses1 it is of little consequence2 such a difference is there in the manner of placing the same thing4 ,when a popular bill has been debated in the two ,houses1 is brought to maturity1 all its conveniences and inconveniences weighed and balanced1 if afterwards it be presented for the ,royal assent1 few princes will venture to reject the unanimous desire of the people4 ,but could the king crush a disagreeable bill in embryo 7as was the case1 for some time1 in the ,scots ,parliament1 by means of the ,lords of the ,articles7 the ,british ,government would have no balance1 nor would grievances ever be redressed4 ,and it is certain that exorbitant power proceeds not1 in any government1 from new laws so much as from neglecting to remedy the abuses which frequently rise from the old ones4 ,a government1 says ,machiavel1 must often be brought back to its original principles4 ,it appears then1 that in the ,oceana the whole legislature may be said to rest in the senate2 which ,harrington would own to be an inconvenient form of government1 especially after the ,agrarian is abolished4 ,here is a form of government to which ,i cannot1 in theory1 discover any considerable objection1 ,let ,great ,britain and ,ireland1 or any territory of equal extent1 be divided into a hundred counties1 and each county into a hundred parishes1 making in all ten thousand4 ,if the country purposed to be erected into a commonwealth be of more narrow extent1 we may diminish the number of counties2 but never bring them below thirty4 ,if it be of greater extent1 it were better to enlarge the parishes1 or throw more parishes into a county1 than increase the number of counties4 ,let all the freeholders of ten pounds a year in the country1 and all the householders worth two hundred pounds in the town parishes1 meet annually in the parish church1 and choose1 by ballot1 some freeholder of the county for their member1 whom we shall call the county representative4 ,let the hundred county representatives1 two days after their election1 meet in the county-town1 and choose by ballot1 from their own body1 ten county magistrates and one senator4 ,there are1 therefore1 in the whole commonwealth1 one hundred senators1 eleven hundred county magistrates1 and ten thousand county representatives2 for we shall bestow on all senators the authority of county magistrates1 and on all county magistrates the authority of county representatives4 ,let the senators meet in the capital1 and be endowed with the whole executive power of the commonwealth2 the power of peace and war1 of giving orders to generals1 admirals1 and ambassadors1 and1 in short1 all the prerogatives of a ,british king1 except his negative4 ,let the county representatives meet in their particular counties1 and possess the whole legislative power of the commonwealth2 the greatest number of counties deciding the question2 and where these are equal1 let the senate have the casting vote4 ,every new law must first be debated in the senate2 and though rejected by it1 if ten senators insist and protest1 it must be sent down to the counties4 ,the senate may join to the copy of the law their reasons for receiving or rejecting it4 ,because it would be troublesome to assemble all the county representatives for every trivial law that may be requisite1 the senate have their choice of sending down the law either to the county magistrates or county representatives4 ,the magistrates1 though the law be referred to them1 may1 if they please1 call the representatives1 and submit the affair to their determination4 ,whether the law be referred by the senate to the county magistrates or representatives1 a copy of it1 and of the senate's reasons1 must be sent to every representative eight days before the day appointed for the assembling1 in order to deliberate concerning it4 ,and though the determination be1 by the senate1 referred to the magistrates1 if five representatives of the county order the magistrates to assemble the whole court of representatives1 and submit the affair to their determination1 they must obey4 ,either the county magistrates or representatives may give to the senator of the county the copy of a law to be proposed to the senate2 and if five counties concur in the same order1 the law1 though refused by the senate1 must come either to the county magistrates or representatives1 as is contained in the order of the five counties4 ,any twenty counties1 by a vote either of their magistrates or representatives1 may throw any man out of all public offices for a year4 ,thirty counties for three years4 ,the senate has a power of throwing out any member or number of members of its own body1 not to be re-elected for that year4 ,the senate cannot throw out twice in a year the senator of the same county4 ,the power of the old senate continues for three weeks after the annual election of the county representatives4 ,then all the new senators are shut up in a conclave1 like the cardinals1 and by an intricate ballot1 such as that of ,venice or ,malta1 they choose the following magistrates3--,a protector1 who represents the dignity of the commonwealth and presides in the senate1 two secretaries of state1 these six councils3 a council of state1 a council of religion and learning1 a council of trade1 a council of laws1 a council of war1 a council of the admiralty1 each council consisting of five persons2 together with six commissioners of the treasury and a first commissioner4 ,all these must be senators4 ,the senate also names all the ambassadors to foreign courts1 who may either be senators or not4 ,the senate may continue any or all of these1 but must re-elect them every year4 ,the protector and two secretaries have session and suffrage in the council of state4 ,the business of that council is all foreign politics4 ,the council of state has session and suffrage in all the other councils4 ,the council of religion and learning inspects the universities and clergy4 ,that of trade inspects everything that may affect commerce4 ,that of laws inspects all the abuses of laws by the inferior magistrates1 and examines what improvements may be made of the municipal law4 ,that of war inspects the militia and its discipline1 magazines1 stores1 etc41 and when the republic is in war1 examines into the proper orders for generals4 ,the council of admiralty has the same power with regard to the navy1 together with the nomination of the captains and all inferior officers4 ,none of these councils can give orders themselves1 except where they receive such powers from the senate4 ,in other cases1 they must communicate everything to the senate4 ,when the senate is under adjournment1 any of the councils may assemble it before the day appointed for its meeting4 ,besides these councils or courts1 there is another called the court of competitors1 which is thus constituted3--,if any candidates for the office of senator have more votes than a third of the representatives1 that candidate who has most votes next to the senator elected1 becomes incapable for one year of all public offices1 even of being a magistrate or representative2 but he takes his seat in the court of competitors4 ,here then is a court which may sometimes consist of a hundred members1 sometimes have no members at all1 and by that means be for a year abolished4 ,the court of competitors has no power in the commonwealth4 ,it has only the inspection of the public accounts and the accusing any man before the senate4 ,if the senate acquit him1 the court of competitors may1 if they please1 appeal to the people1 either magistrates or representatives4 ,upon that appeal the magistrates or representatives meet at the day appointed by the court of competitors1 and choose in each county three persons1 from which number every senator is excluded4 ,these to the number of three hundred meet in the capital1 and bring the person accused to a new trial4 ,the court of competitors may propose any law to the senate1 and if refused1 may appeal to the people--that is to the magistrates or representatives1 who examine it in their counties4 ,every senator who is thrown out of the senate by a vote of the court1 takes his seat in the court of competitors4 ,the senate possesses all the judicative authority of the ,house of ,lords--that is1 all the appeals from the inferior courts4 ,it likewise nominates the ,lord ,chancellor and all the officers of the law4 ,every county is a kind of republic within itself1 and the representatives may make county-laws1 which have no authority until three months after they are voted4 ,a copy of the law is sent to the senate and to every other county4 ,the senate or any single county may at any time annul any law of another county4 ,the representatives have all the authority of the ,british justices of peace in trials1 commitments1 etc4 ,the magistrates have the nomination of all the officers of the revenue in each county4 ,all causes with regard to the revenue are appealed ultimately to the magistrates4 ,they pass the accounts of all the officers1 but must have all their own accounts examined and passed at the end of the year by the representatives4 ,the magistrates name rectors or ministers to all the parishes4 ,the ,presbyterian government is established1 and the highest ecclesiastical court is an assembly or synod of all the presbyters of the county4 ,the magistrates may take any cause from this court1 and determine it themselves4 ,the magistrates may try and depose or suspend any presbyter4 ,the militia is established in imitation of that of ,switzerland1 which1 being well known1 we shall not insist upon it4 ,it will only be proper to make this addition1 that an army of #bj1jjj men be annually drawn out by rotation1 paid and encamped during six weeks in summer1 that the duty of a camp may not be altogether unknown4 ,the magistrates nominate all the colonels and downwards4 ,the senate all upwards4 ,during war1 the general nominates the colonel and downwards1 and his commission is good for a twelvemonth2 but after that1 it must be confirmed by the magistrates of the county to which the regiment belongs4 ,the magistrates may break any officer in the county regiment1 and the senate may do the same to any officer in the service4 ,if the magistrates do not think proper to confirm the general's choice1 they may nominate another officer in the place of him they reject4 ,all crimes are tried within the county by the magistrates and a jury2 but the senate can stop any trial1 and bring it before themselves4 ,any county may indict any man before the senate for any crime4 ,the protector1 the two secretaries1 the council of state1 with any five more that the senate appoints on extraordinary emergencies1 are possessed of dictatorial power for six months4 ,the protector may pardon any person condemned by the inferior courts4 ,in time of war1 no officer of the army that is in the field can have any civil office in the commonwealth4 ,the capital1 which we shall call ,london1 may be allowed four members in the senate4 ,it may therefore be divided into four counties4 ,the representatives of each of these choose one senator and ten magistrates4 ,there are therefore in the city four senators1 forty-four magistrates1 and four hundred representatives4 ,the magistrates have the same authority as in the counties4 ,the representatives also have the same authority2 but they never meet in one general court4 ,they give their votes in their particular county or division of hundreds4 ,when they enact any city-law1 the greatest number of counties or divisions determines the matter2 and where these are equal1 the magistrates have the casting vote4 ,the magistrates choose the mayor1 sheriff1 recorder1 and other officers of the city4 ,in the commonwealth1 no representative1 magistrate1 or senator1 as such1 has any salary4 ,the protector1 secretaries1 councils1 and ambassadors have salaries4 ,the first year in every century is set apart to correct all inequalities which time may have produced in the representative4 ,this must be done by the legislature4 ,the following political aphorisms may explain the reason of these orders4 ,the lower sort of people and small proprietors are good enough judges of one not very distant from them in rank or habitation1 and therefore1 in their parochial meetings1 will probably choose the best1 or nearly the best representative2 but they are wholly unfit for county-meetings and for electing into the higher offices of the republic4 ,their ignorance gives the grandees an opportunity of deceiving them4 ,ten thousand1 even though they were not annually elected1 are a large enough basis for any free government4 ,it is true the nobles in ,poland are more than #aj1jjj1 and yet these oppress the people2 but as power continues there always in the same persons and families1 this makes them1 in a manner1 a different nation from the people4 ,besides1 the nobles are there united under a few heads of families4 ,all free governments must consist of two councils1 a less and a greater2 or1 in other words1 of a senate and people4 ,the people1 as ,harrington observes1 would want wisdom without the senate2 the senate without the people would want honesty4 ,a large assembly of #ajjj1 for instance1 to represent the people1 if allowed to debate1 would fall into disorder4 ,if not allowed to debate1 the senate has a negative upon them1 and the worst kind of negative--that before resolution4 ,here therefore is an inconvenience which no government has yet fully remedied1 but which is the easiest to be remedied in the world4 ,if the people debate1 all is confusion2 if they do not debate1 they can only resolve1 and then the senate carves for them4 ,divide the people into many separate bodies1 and then they may debate with safety1 and every inconvenience seems to be prevented4 ,cardinal de ,retz says that all numerous assemblies1 however composed1 are mere mob1 and swayed in their debates by the least motive4 ,this we find confirmed by daily experience4 ,when an absurdity strikes a member1 he conveys it to his neighbour1 and so on till the whole be infected4 ,separate this great body1 and though every member be only of middling sense1 it is not probable that anything but reason can prevail over the whole4 ,influence and example being removed1 good sense will always get the better of bad among a number of people4 ,good sense is one thing2 but follies are numberless1 and every man has a different one4 ,the only way of making a people wise is to keep them from uniting into large assemblies4 ,there are two things to be guarded against in every senate--its combination and its division4 ,its combination is most dangerous1 and against this inconvenience we have provided the following remedies3--#a4 ,the great dependence of the senators on the people by annual election1 and that not by an undistinguishing rabble1 like the ,english electors1 but by men of fortune and education4 #b4 ,the small power they are allowed4 ,they have few offices to dispose of4 ,almost all are given by the magistrates in the counties4 #c4 ,the court of competitors which1 being composed of men that are their rivals next to them in interest and uneasy in their present situation1 will be sure to take all advantages against them4 ,the division of the senate is prevented--#a4 ,by the smallness of their number4 #b4 ,as faction supposes a combination to a separate interest1 it is prevented by their dependence on the people4 #c4 ,they have a power of expelling any factious member4 ,it is true when another member of the same spirit comes from the county1 they have no power of expelling him2 nor is it fit they should1 for that shows the humour to be in the people1 and probably arises from some ill-conduct in public affairs4 #d4 ,almost any man in a senate so regularly chosen by the people may be supposed fit for any civil office4 ,it would be proper1 therefore1 for the senate to form some general resolutions with regard to the disposing of offices among the members1 which resolutions would not confine them in critical times1 when extraordinary parts on the one hand1 or extraordinary stupidity on the other1 appears in any senator2 but yet they would be sufficient to prevent intrigue and faction1 by making the disposal of the offices a thing of course4 ,for instance1 let it be a resolution3--,that no man shall enjoy any office till he has sat four years in the senate2 that1 except ambassadors1 no man shall be in office two years following2 that no man shall attain the higher offices but through the lower2 that no man shall be protector twice1 etc4 ,the senate of ,venice govern themselves by such resolutions4 ,in foreign politics the interest of the senate can scarce ever be divided from that of the people1 and therefore it is fit to make the senate absolute with regard to them1 otherwise there could be no secrecy nor refined policy4 ,besides1 without money no alliance can be executed1 and the senate is still sufficiently dependent4 ,not to mention that the legislative power being always superior to the executive1 the magistrates or representatives may interpose1 whenever they think proper4 ,the chief support of the ,british ,government is the ,opposition of interests2 but that1 though in the main serviceable1 breeds endless factions4 ,in the foregoing plan1 it does all the good without any of the harm4 ,the competitors have no power of controlling the senate2 they have only the power of accusing and appealing to the people4 ,it is necessary1 likewise1 to prevent both combination and division in the thousand magistrates4 ,this is done sufficiently by the separation of places and interests4 ,but lest that should not be enough1 their dependence on the #aj1jjj for their elections serves to the same purpose4 ,nor is that all3 for the #aj1jjj may resume the power whenever they please2 and not only when they all please1 but when any five of a hundred please1 which will happen upon the very first suspicion of a separate interest4 ,the #aj1jjj are too large a body either to unite or divide1 except when they meet in one place1 and fall under the guidance of ambitious leaders4 ,not to mention their annual election by the whole body of the people that are of any consideration4 ,a small commonwealth is the happiest government in the world within itself1 because everything lies under the eye of the rulers2 but it may be subdued by great force from without4 ,this scheme seems to have all the advantages both of a great and a little commonwealth4 ,every county-law may be annulled either by the senate or another county1 because that shows an opposition of interest3 in which case no part ought to decide for itself4 ,the matter must be referred to the whole1 which will best determine what agrees with general interest4 ,as to the clergy and militia1 the reasons of these orders are obvious4 ,without the dependence of the clergy on the civil magistrates1 and without a militia1 it is folly to think any free government will ever have security or stability4 ,in many governments the inferior magistrates have no rewards but what arise from their ambition1 vanity1 or public spirit4 ,the salaries of the ,french judges amount not to the interest of the sums they pay for their offices4 ,the ,dutch burgomasters have little more immediate profit than the ,english justices of peace1 or the members of the ,house of ,commons formerly4 ,but lest any should suspect that this would beget negligence in the administration 7which is little to be feared1 considering the natural ambition of mankind71 let the magistrates have competent salaries4 ,the senators have access to so many honourable and lucrative offices that their attendance needs not be bought4 ,there is little attendance required of the representatives4 ,that the foregoing plan of government is practicable no one can doubt1 who considers the resemblance it bears to the commonwealth of the ,united ,provinces1 formerly one of the wisest and most renowned governments in the world4 ,the alterations in the present scheme are all evidently to the better4 #a4 ,the representation is more equal4 #b4 ,the unlimited power of the burgomasters in the towns1 which forms a perfect aristocracy in the ,dutch commonwealth1 is corrected by a well-tempered democracy1 in giving to the people the annual election of the county representatives4 #c4 ,the negative1 which every province and town has upon the whole body of the ,dutch republic1 with regard to alliances1 peace and war1 and the imposition of taxes1 is here removed4 #d4 ,the counties1 in the present plan1 are not so independent of each other1 nor do they form separate bodies so much as the seven provinces2 where the jealousy and envy of the smaller provinces and towns against the greater1 particularly ,holland and ,amsterdam1 have frequently disturbed the government4 #e4 ,larger powers1 though of the safest kind1 are entrusted to the senate than the ,states-,general possess2 by which means the former may become more expeditious and secret in their resolutions than it is possible for the latter4 ,the chief alterations that could be made on the ,british ,government1 in order to bring it to the most perfect model of living monarchy1 seem to be the following3--,first1 ,the plan of the ,republican ,parliament ought to be restored1 by making the representation equal1 and by allowing none to vote in the county elections who possess not a property of #bjj pounds value4 ,secondly1 ,as such a ,house of ,commons would be too weighty for a frail ,house of ,lords like the present1 the bishops and ,scots peers ought to be removed1 whose behaviour1 in former ,parliaments1 destroyed entirely the authority of that ,house4 ,the number of the ,upper ,house ought to be raised to three or four hundred2 their seats not hereditary1 but during life4 ,they ought to have the election of their own members2 and no commoner should be allowed to refuse a seat that was offered him4 ,by this means the ,house of ,lords would consist entirely of the men of chief credit1 ability1 and interest of the nation2 and every turbulent leader in the ,house of ,commons might be taken off and connected in interest with the ,house of ,peers4 ,such an aristocracy would be a splendid barrier both to the monarchy and against it4 ,at present the balance of our ,government depends in some measure on the ability and behaviour of the sovereign1 which are variable and uncertain circumstances4 ,i allow that this plan of limited monarchy1 however corrected1 is still liable to three great inconveniences4 ,first1 it removes not entirely1 though it may soften1 the parties of court and country2 secondly1 the king's personal character must still have a great influence on the ,government2 thirdly1 the sword is in the hands of a single person1 who will always neglect to discipline the militia1 in order to have a pretence for keeping up a standing army4 ,it is evident that this is a mortal distemper in ,british ,government1 of which it must at last inevitably perish4 ,i must1 however1 confess that ,sweden seems in some measure to have remedied this inconvenience1 and to have a militia1 with its limited monarchy1 as well as a standing army1 which is less dangerous than the ,british4 ,we shall conclude this subject with observing the falsehood of the common opinion that no large state1 such as ,france or ,britain1 could ever be modelled into a commonwealth1 but that such a form of government can only take place in a city or small territory4 ,the contrary seems evident4 ,though it is more difficult to form a republican government in an extensive country than in a city1 there is more facility1 when once it is formed1 of preserving it steady and uniform1 without tumult and faction4 ,it is not easy for the distant parts of a large state to combine in any plan of free government2 but they easily conspire in the esteem and reverence of a single person1 who1 by means of this popular favour1 may seize the power1 and forcing the more obstinate to submit1 may establish a monarchical government4 ,on the other hand1 a city readily concurs in the same notions of government1 the natural equality of property favours liberty1 and the nearness of habitation enables the citizens mutually to assist each other4 ,even under absolute princes the subordinate government of cities is commonly republican2 while that of counties and provinces is monarchical4 ,but these same circumstances1 which facilitate the erection of commonwealths in cities1 render their constitution more frail and uncertain4 ,democracies are turbulent4 ,for however the people may be separated or divided into small parties1 either in their votes or elections1 their near habitation in a city will always make the force of popular tides and currents very sensible4 ,aristocracies are better adapted for peace and order1 and accordingly were most admired by ancient writers2 but they are jealous and oppressive4 ,in a large government1 which is modelled with masterly skill1 there is compass and room enough to refine the democracy from the lower people1 who may be admitted into the first elections or first concoction of the commonwealth to the higher magistrates who direct all the movements4 ,at the same time1 the parts are so distant and remote that it is very difficult1 either by intrigue1 prejudice1 or passion1 to hurry them into any measures against the public interest4 ,it is needless to inquire whether such a government would be immortal4 ,i allow the justness of the poet's exclamation on the endless projects of human race1 8,man and for ever60 ,the world itself probably is not immortal4 ,such consuming plagues may arise as would leave even a perfect government a weak prey to its neighbours4 ,we know not to what lengths enthusiasm or other extraordinary motions of the human mind may transport men1 to the neglect of all order and public good4 ,where difference of interest is removed1 whimsical and unaccountable factions often arise from personal favour or enmity4 ,perhaps rust may grow to the springs of the most accurate political machine and disorder its motions4 ,lastly1 extensive conquests1 when pursued1 must be the ruin of every free government2 and of the more perfect governments sooner than of the imperfect1 because of the very advantages which the former possess above the latter4 ,and though such a state ought to establish a fundamental law against conquests1 yet republics have ambition as well as individuals1 and present interest makes men forgetful of their posterity4 ,it is a sufficient incitement to human endeavours that such a government would flourish for many ages1 without pretending to bestow on any work of man that immortality which the ,almighty seems to have refused to his own productions4 ,,that ,,politics ,,may ,,be ,,reduced ,,to ,a ,,science4 ,it is a question with many whether there be any essential difference between one form of government and another8 and whether every form may not become good or bad according as it is well or ill administered8#aac ,were it once admitted that all governments are alike1 and that the only difference consists in the character and conduct of the governors1 most political disputes would be at an end1 and all zeal for one constitution above another must be esteemed mere bigotry and folly4 ,but1 though a friend to moderation1 ,i cannot forbear condemning this sentiment1 and should be sorry to think that human affairs admit of no greater stability than what they receive from the casual humours and characters of particular men4 ,it is true1 those who maintain that the goodness of all government consists in the goodness of the administration1 may cite many particular instances in history where the very same government in different hands has varied suddenly into the two opposite extremes of good and bad4 ,compare the ,french ,government under ,henry ,,iii4 and under ,henry ,,iv4 ,oppression1 levity1 artifice on the part of the rulers2 faction1 sedition1 treachery1 rebellion1 disloyalty on the part of the subjects3 these compose the character of the former miserable era4 ,but when the patriot and heroic prince who succeeded was once firmly seated on the throne1 the government1 the people1 everything seemed to be totally changed2 and all from the difference of the temper and sentiments of these two sovereigns4 ,an equal difference of a contrary kind may be found on comparing the reigns of ,elizabeth and ,james--at least with regard to foreign affairs2 and instances of this kind may be multiplied almost without number from ancient as well as modern history4 ,but here ,i would beg leave to make a distinction4 ,all absolute governments 7and such1 in a great measure1 was that of ,england till the middle of the last century1 notwithstanding the numerous panegyrics on ancient ,english liberty7 must very much depend on the administration2 and this is one of the great inconveniences of that form of government4 ,but a republican and free government would be a most obvious absurdity if the particular checks and controls provided by the constitution had really no influence1 and made it not the interest1 even of bad men1 to operate for the public good4 ,such is the intention of these forms of government1 and such is their real effect where they are wisely constituted3 as1 on the other hand1 they are the sources of all disorder and of the blackest crimes where either skill or honesty has been wanting in their original frame and institution4 ,so great is the force of laws and of particular forms of government1 and so little dependence have they on the humours and tempers of men1 that consequences almost as general and certain may be deduced from them on most occasions as any which the mathematical sciences afford us4 ,the ,roman government gave the whole legislative power to the commons1 without allowing a negative either to the nobility or consuls4 ,this unbounded power the commons possessed in a collective1 not in a representative body4 ,the consequences were--when the people1 by success and conquest1 had become very numerous and had spread themselves to a great distance from the capital1 the city tribes1 though the most contemptible1 carried almost every vote4 ,they were1 therefore1 most cajoled by every one who affected popularity2 they were supported in idleness by the general distribution of corn1 and by particular bribes1 which they received from almost every candidate4 ,by this means they became every day more licentious1 and the ,campus ,martius was a perpetual scene of tumult and sedition3 armed slaves were introduced among these rascally citizens1 so that the whole government fell into anarchy1 and the greatest happiness which the ,romans could look for was the despotic power of the ,csars4 ,such are the effects of democracy without a representative4 ,a nobility may possess the whole or any part of the legislative power of a state in two different ways4 ,either every nobleman shares the power as part of the whole body1 or the whole body enjoys the power as composed of parts which have each a distinct power and authority4 ,the ,venetian aristocracy is an instance of the first kind of government2 the ,polish of the second4 ,in the ,venetian government the whole body of nobility possesses the whole power1 and no nobleman has any authority which he receives not from the whole4 ,in the ,polish government every nobleman1 by means of his fiefs1 has a peculiar hereditary authority over his vassals1 and the whole body has no authority but what it receives from the concurrence of its parts4 ,the distinct operations and tendencies of these two species of government might be made most apparent even priori4 ,a ,venetian nobility is infinitely preferable to a ,polish1 let the humours and education of men be ever so much varied4 ,a nobility who possess their power in common will preserve peace and order both among themselves and their subjects1 and no member can have authority enough to control the laws for a moment4 ,the nobles will preserve their authority over the people1 but without any grievous tyranny or any breach of private property1 because such a tyrannical government promotes not the interest of the whole body1 however it may that of some individuals4 ,there will be a distinction of rank between the nobility and people1 but this will be the only distinction in the state4 ,the whole nobility will form one body1 and the whole people another1 without any of those private feuds and animosities which spread ruin and desolation everywhere4 ,it is easy to see the disadvantages of a ,polish nobility in every one of these particulars4 ,it is possible so to constitute a free government as that a single person--call him doge1 prince1 or king--shall possess a very large share of power1 and shall form a proper balance or counterpoise to the other parts of the legislature4 ,this chief magistrate may be either elective or hereditary1 and though the former institution may1 to a superficial view1 appear the most advantageous1 yet a more accurate inspection will discover in it greater inconveniences than in the latter1 and such as are founded on causes and principles eternal and immutable4 ,the filling of the throne in such a government is a point of too great and too general interest not to divide the whole people into factions1 from whence a civil war1 the greatest of ills1 may be apprehended almost with certainty upon every vacancy4 ,the prince elected must be either a foreigner or a native2 the former will be ignorant of the people whom he is to govern1 suspicious of his new subjects and suspected by them1 giving his confidence entirely to strangers1 who will have no other care but of enriching themselves in the quickest manner1 while their master's favour and authority are able to support them4 ,a native will carry into the throne all his private animosities and friendships1 and will never be regarded1 in his elevation1 without exciting the sentiments of envy in those who formerly considered him as their equal4 ,not to mention that a crown is too high a reward ever to be given to merit alone1 and will always induce the candidates to employ force1 or money1 or intrigue to procure the votes of the electors2 so that such an election will give no better chance for superior merit in the prince than if the state had trusted to birth alone for determining their sovereign4 ,it may therefore be pronounced as a universal axiom in politics that a hereditary prince1 a nobility without vassals1 and a people voting by their representatives form the best monarchy1 aristocracy1 and democracy4 ,but in order to prove more fully that politics admit of general truths which are invariable by the humour or education either of subject or sovereign1 it may not be amiss to observe some other principles of this science which may seem to deserve that character4 ,it may easily be observed that though free governments have been commonly the most happy for those who partake of their freedom1 yet are they the most ruinous and oppressive to their provinces2 and this observation may1 ,i believe1 be fixed as a maxim of the kind we are here speaking of4 ,when a monarch extends his dominions by conquest he soon learns to consider his old and his new subjects as on the same footing1 because1 in reality1 all his subjects are to him the same1 except the few friends and favourites with whom he is personally acquainted4 ,he does not1 therefore1 make any distinction between them in his general laws1 and at the same time is no less careful to prevent all particular acts of oppression on the one as on the other4 ,but a free state necessarily makes a great distinction1 and must always do so1 till men learn to love their neighbours as well as themselves4 ,the conquerors1 in such a government1 are all legislators1 and will be sure so to contrive matters1 by restrictions of trade and by taxes1 as to draw some private1 as well as public advantage from their conquests4 ,provincial governors have also a better chance in a republic to escape with their plunder by means of bribery and interest2 and their fellow-citizens1 who find their own state to be enriched by the spoils of the subject-provinces1 will be the more inclined to tolerate such abuses4 ,not to mention that it is a necessary precaution in a free state to change the governors frequently1 which obliges these temporary tyrants to be more expeditious and rapacious1 that they may accumulate sufficient wealth before they give place to their successors4 ,what cruel tyrants were the ,romans over the world during the time of their commonwealth6 ,it is true they had laws to prevent oppression in their provincial magistrates1 but ,cicero informs us that the ,romans could not better consult the interest of the provinces than by repealing these very laws4 8,for in that case10 says he1 8our magistrates1 having entire impunity1 would plunder no more than would satisfy their own rapaciousness2 whereas at present they must also satisfy that of their judges1 and of all the great men of ,rome whose protection they stand in need of40 ,who can read of the cruelties and oppressions of ,verres without horror and astonishment8 ,and who is not touched with indignation to hear that after ,cicero had exhausted on that abandoned criminal all the thunders of his eloquence1 and had prevailed so far as to get him condemned to the utmost extent of the laws1 yet that cruel tyrant lived peaceably to old age in opulence and ease1 and thirty years afterwards was put into the proscription by ,mark ,anthony on account of his exorbitant wealth1 where he fell1 with ,cicero himself1 and all the most virtuous men of ,rome8 ,after the dissolution of the commonwealth the ,roman yoke became easier upon the provinces1 as ,tacitus informs us2 and it may be observed that many of the worst emperors--,domitian1 for instance--were very careful to prevent all oppression of the provinces4 ,in ,tiberius's time ,gaul was esteemed richer than ,italy itself2 nor do ,i find during the whole time of the ,roman monarchy that the empire became less rich or populous in any of its provinces1 though indeed its valour and military discipline were always upon the decline4 ,the oppression and tyranny of the ,carthaginians over their subject-states in ,africa went so far1 as we learn from ,polybius1 that1 not content with exacting the half of all the produce of the ground1 which of itself was a very high rent1 they also loaded them with many other taxes4 ,if we pass from ancient to modern times1 we shall always find the observation to hold4 ,the provinces of absolute monarchies are always better treated than those of free states4 ,compare the ,pas conquis of ,france with ,ireland1 and you will be convinced of this truth2 though this latter kingdom1 being in a good measure peopled from ,england1 possesses so many rights and privileges as should naturally make it challenge better treatment than that of a conquered province4 ,corsica is also an obvious instance to the same purpose4 ,there is an observation of ,machiavel1 with regard to the conquests of ,alexander the ,great1 which ,i think may be regarded as one of those eternal political truths which no time nor accidents can vary4 ,it may seem strange1 says that politician1 that such sudden conquests as those of ,alexander should be settled so peaceably by his successors1 and that the ,persians1 during all the confusions and civil wars of the ,greeks1 never made the smallest effort towards the recovery of their former independent government4 ,to satisfy us concerning the cause of this remarkable event1 we may consider that a monarch may govern his subjects in two different ways4 ,he may either follow the maxims of the eastern princes1 and stretch his power so far as to leave no distinction of ranks among his subjects1 but what proceeds immediately from himself--no advantages of birth2 no hereditary honours and possessions2 and1 in a word1 no credit among the people except from his commission alone4 ,or a monarch may exert his power after a milder manner1 like our ,european princes1 and leave other sources of honour1 beside his smile and favour3 birth1 titles1 possessions1 valour1 integrity1 knowledge1 or great and fortunate achievements4 ,in the former species of government1 after a conquest1 it is impossible ever to shake off the yoke1 since no one possesses among the people so much personal credit and authority as to begin such an enterprise2 whereas1 in the latter1 the least misfortune or discord of the victors will encourage the vanquished to take arms1 who have leaders ready to prompt and conduct them in every undertaking4#aad ,such is the reasoning of ,machiavel1 which seems to me very solid and conclusive1 though ,i wish he had not mixed falsehood with truth in asserting that monarchies governed according to the ,eastern policy1 though more easily kept when once subdued1 yet are the most difficult to subdue1 since they cannot contain any powerful subject whose discontent and faction may facilitate the enterprises of an enemy4 ,for besides that such a tyrannical government enervates the courage of men and renders them indifferent towards the fortunes of their sovereign2 besides this1 ,i say1 we find by experience that even the temporary and delegated authority of the generals and magistrates being always1 in such governments1 as absolute within its sphere as that of the prince himself1 is able1 with barbarians accustomed to a blind submission1 to produce the most dangerous and fatal revolutions4 ,so that1 in every respect1 a gentle government is preferable1 and gives the greatest security to the sovereign as well as to the subject4 ,legislators1 therefore1 ought not to trust the future government of a state entirely to chance1 but ought to provide a system of laws to regulate the administration of public affairs to the latest posterity4 ,effects will always correspond to causes1 and wise regulations in any commonwealth are the most valuable legacy which can be left to future ages4 ,in the smallest court or office the stated forms and methods by which business must be conducted are found to be a considerable check on the natural depravity of mankind4 ,why should not the case be the same in public affairs8 ,can we ascribe the stability and wisdom of the ,venetian ,government through so many ages to anything but the form of government8 ,and is it not easy to point out those defects in the original constitution which produced the tumultuous governments of ,athens and ,rome1 and ended at last in the ruin of these two famous republics8 ,and so little dependence has this affair on the humours and education of particular men that one part of the same republic may be wisely conducted and another weakly1 by the very same men1 merely on account of the difference of the forms and institutions by which these parts are regulated4 ,historians inform us that this was actually the case with ,genoa2 for while the state was always full of sedition1 and tumult1 and disorder1 the bank of ,st4 ,george1 which had become a considerable part of the people1 was conducted for several ages with the utmost integrity and wisdom4 ,the ages of greatest public spirit are not always most eminent for private virtue4 ,good laws may beget order and moderation in the government where the manners and customs have instilled little humanity or justice into the tempers of men4 ,the most illustrious period of the ,roman history1 considered in a political view1 is that between the beginning of the first and the end of the last ,punic ,war2 the due balance between the nobility and people being then fixed by the contests of the tribunes1 and not being yet lost by the extent of conquests4 ,yet at this very time the horrid practice of poisoning was so common that1 during part of the season1 a prtor punished capitally for this crime above three thousand persons in a part of ,italy1 and found informations of this nature still multiplying upon him4 ,there is a similar1 or rather a worse instance in the more early times of the commonwealth2 so depraved in private life were that people1 whom in their histories we so much admire4 ,i doubt not but they were really more virtuous during the time of the two ,triumvirates1 when they were tearing their common country to pieces1 and spreading slaughter and desolation over the face of the earth merely for the choice of tyrants4 ,here1 then1 is a sufficient inducement to maintain1 with the utmost zeal1 in every free state1 those forms and institutions by which liberty is secured1 the public good consulted1 and the avarice or ambition of particular men restrained and punished4 ,nothing does more honour to human nature than to see it susceptible of so noble a passion1 as nothing can be a greater indication of meanness of heart in any man than to see him devoid of it4 ,a man who loves only himself1 without regard to friendship and merit1 is a detestable monster2 and a man who is only susceptible of friendship1 without public spirit or a regard to the community1 is deficient in the most material part of virtue4 ,but this is a subject which needs not be longer insisted on at present4 ,there are enough of zealots on both sides who kindle up the passions of their partisans1 and under the pretence of public good pursue the interests and ends of their particular faction4 ,for my part ,i shall always be more fond of promoting moderation than zeal1 though perhaps the surest way of producing moderation in every party is to increase our zeal for the public4 ,let us therefore try1 if it be possible1 from the foregoing doctrine to draw a lesson of moderation with regard to the parties into which our country is at present divided2 at the same time1 that we allow not this moderation to abate the industry and passion with which every individual is bound to pursue the good of his country4 ,those who either attack or defend a minister in such a government as ours1 where the utmost liberty is allowed1 always carry matters to an extreme1 and exaggerate his merit or demerit with regard to the public4 ,his enemies are sure to charge him with the greatest enormities1 both in domestic and foreign management1 and there is no meanness or crime of which1 in their account1 he is not capable4 ,unnecessary wars1 scandalous treaties1 profusion of public treasure1 oppressive taxes1 every kind of mal-administration is ascribed to him4 ,to aggravate the charge1 his pernicious conduct1 it is said1 will extend its baleful influence even to posterity1 by undermining the best constitution in the world1 and disordering that wise system of laws1 institutions1 and customs by which our ancestors for so many centuries have been so happily governed4 ,he is not only a wicked minister in himself1 but has removed every security provided against wicked ministers for the future4 ,on the other hand1 the partisans of the minister make his panegyric run as high as the accusation against him1 and celebrate his wise1 steady1 and moderate conduct in every part of his administration4 ,the honour and interest of the nation supported abroad1 public credit maintained at home1 persecution restrained1 faction subdued3 the merit of all these blessings is ascribed solely to the minister4 ,at the same time he crowns all his other merits by a religious care of the best constitution in the world1 which he has preserved in all its parts1 and has transmitted entire to be the happiness and security of the latest posterity4 ,when this accusation and panegyric are received by the partisans of each party1 no wonder they beget a most extraordinary ferment on both sides1 and fill the nation with the most violent animosities4 ,but ,i would fain persuade these party-zealots that there is a flat contradiction both in the accusation and panegyric1 and that it were impossible for either of them to run so high were it not for this contradiction4 ,if our constitution be really that noble fabric1 the pride of ,britain1 the envy of our neighbours1 raised by the labour of so many centuries1 repaired at the expense of so many millions1 and cemented by such a profusion of blood--,i say1 if our constitution does in any degree deserve these eulogies1 it would never have suffered a wicked and weak minister to govern triumphantly for a course of twenty years1 when opposed by the greatest geniuses of the nation1 who exercised the utmost liberty of tongue and pen1 in ,parliament and in their frequent appeals to the people4 ,but if the minister be wicked and weak to the degree so strenuously insisted on1 the constitution must be faulty in its original principles1 and he cannot consistently be charged with undermining the best constitution in the world4 ,a constitution is only so far good as it provides a remedy against mal-administration1 and if the ,british constitution1 when in its greatest vigour1 and repaired by two such remarkable events as the ,revolution and ,accession1 by which our ancient royal family was sacrificed to it--if our constitution1 ,i say1 with so great advantages does not1 in fact1 provide any such remedy1 we are rather beholden to any minister who undermines it and affords us an opportunity of erecting in its place a better constitution4 ,i would make use of the same topics to moderate the zeal of those who defend the minister4 ,is our constitution so excellent8 ,then a change of ministry can be no such dreadful event1 since it is essential to such a constitution1 in every ministry1 both to preserve itself from violation and to prevent all enormities in the administration4 ,is our constitution very bad8 ,then so extraordinary a jealousy and apprehension on account of changes is ill-placed1 and a man should no more be anxious in this case than a husband1 who had married a wife from the stews1 should be watchful to prevent her infidelity4 ,public affairs in such a constitution must necessarily go to confusion1 by whatever hands they are conducted1 and the zeal of patriots is much less requisite in that case than the patience and submission of philosophers4 ,the virtue and good intentions of ,cato and ,brutus are highly laudable1 but to what purpose did their zeal serve8 ,to nothing but to hasten the fatal period of the ,roman government1 and render its convulsions and dying agonies more violent and painful4 ,i would not be understood to mean that public affairs deserve no care and attention at all4 ,would men be moderate and consistent1 their claims might be admitted--at least might be examined4 ,the country-party might still assert that our constitution1 though excellent1 will admit of mal-administration to a certain degree1 and therefore1 if the minister be bad1 it is proper to oppose him with a suitable degree of zeal4 ,and1 on the other hand1 the court-party may be allowed1 upon the supposition that the minister were good1 to defend1 and with some zeal too1 his administration4 ,i would only persuade men not to contend1 as if they were fighting pro aris et focis1 and change a good constitution into a bad one by the violence of their factions4#aae ,i have not here considered anything that is personal in the present controversy4 ,in the best civil constitution1 where every man is restrained by the most rigid laws1 it is easy to discover either the good or bad intentions of a minister1 and to judge whether his personal character deserves love or hatred4 ,but such questions are of little importance to the public1 and lay those who employ their pens upon them under a just suspicion either of malevolence or flattery4 ,,notes1 ,,politics ,,reduced ,,to ,a ,,science4 #aac 8,for forms of government let fools contest2 ,whate'er is best administer'd is best40 ,essay on ,man1 ,book iii4 #aad ,i have taken it for granted1 according to the supposition of ,machiavel1 that the ancient ,persians had no nobility1 though there is reason to suspect that the ,florentine secretary1 who seems to have been better acquainted with the ,roman than the ,greek authors1 was mistaken in this particular4 ,the more ancient ,persians1 whose manners are described by ,xenophon1 were a free people1 and had nobility4 ,their were preserved even after the extending of their conquests and the consequent change of their government4 ,arrian mentions them in ,darius's time 7,de exped4 ,alex41 lib4 #b74 ,historians also speak often of the persons in command as men of family4 ,tygranes1 who was general of the ,medes under ,xerxes1 was of the race of ,achmnes 7,herod41 lib4 #g1 cap4 #fb74 ,artachas1 who directed the cutting of the canal about ,mount ,athos1 was of the same family 7id41 cap4 #aag74 ,megabyzus was one of the seven eminent ,persians who conspired against the ,magi4 ,his son ,zopyrus was in the highest command under ,darius1 and delivered ,babylon to him4 ,his grandson ,megabyzus commanded the army defeated at ,marathon4 ,his great grandson ,zopyrus was also eminent1 and was banished ,persia 7,herod41 lib4 #c2 ,thuc41 lib4 #a74 ,rosaces1 who commanded an army in ,egypt under ,artaxerxes1 was also descended from one of the seven conspirators 7,diod4 ,sic41 lib4 #af74 ,agesilaus 7in ,xenophon1 ,hist4 ,grc4 lib4 #d71 being desirous of making a marriage betwixt ,king ,cotys1 his ally1 and the daughter of ,spithridates1 a ,persian of rank who had deserted to him1 first asks ,cotys what rank ,spithridates is of4 ,one of the most considerable in ,persia1 says ,cotys4 ,arius1 when offered the sovereignty by ,clearchus and the ten thousand ,greeks1 refused it as of too low a rank1 and said that so many eminent ,persians would never endure his rule 7id41 ,de exped4 lib4 #b74 ,some of the families1 descended from the seven ,persians above mentioned1 remained during all ,alexander's successors2 and ,mithridates1 in ,antiochus's time1 is said by ,polybius to be descended from one of them 7lib4 #e1 cap4 #dc74 ,artabazus was esteemed1 as ,arrian says1 7lib4 #c74 ,and when ,alexander married in one day eighty of his captains to ,persian women1 his intention plainly was to ally the ,macedonians with the most eminent ,persian families 7id41 lib4 #g74 ,diodorus ,siculus says they were of the most noble birth in ,persia 7lib4 #ag74 ,the government of ,persia was despotic1 and conducted in many respects after the ,eastern manner1 but was not carried so far as to extirpate all nobility1 and confound all ranks and orders4 ,it left men who were still great1 by themselves and their family1 independent of their office and commission4 ,and the reason why the ,macedonians kept so easily dominion over them was owing to other causes easy to be found in the historians1 though it must be owned that ,machiavel's reasoning was in itself just1 however doubtful its application to the present case4 #aae ,what our author's opinion was of the famous minister here pointed at may be learned from that essay1 printed in the former editions1 under the title of 8,a ,character of ,sir ,robert ,walpole40 ,it was as follows3--8,there never was a man whose actions and character have been more earnestly and openly canvassed than those of the present minister1 who1 having governed a learned and free nation for so long a time1 amidst such mighty opposition1 may make a large library of what has been written for and against him1 and is the subject of above half the paper that has been blotted in the nation within these twenty years4 ,i wish1 for the honour of our country1 that any one character of him had been drawn with such judgment and impartiality as to have credit with posterity1 and to show that our liberty has1 once at least1 been employed to good purpose4 ,i am only afraid of failing in the former quality of judgment2 but if it should be so1 it is but one page more thrown away1 after a hundred thousand1 upon the same subject1 that have perished and become useless4 ,in the meantime1 ,i shall flatter myself with the pleasing imagination that the following character will be adopted by future historians3-- 8,sir ,robert ,walpole1 ,prime ,minister of ,great ,britain1 is a man of ability1 not a genius2 good-natured1 not virtuous2 constant1 not magnanimous2 moderate1 not equitable4#aaf ,his virtues1 in some instances1 are free from the alloy of those vices which usually accompany such virtues4 ,he is a generous friend1 without being a bitter enemy4 ,his vices1 in other instances1 are not compensated by those virtues which are nearly allied to them3 his want of enterprise is not attended with frugality4 ,the private character of the man is better than the public1 his virtues more than his vices1 his fortune greater than his fame4 ,with many good qualities he has incurred the public hatred2 with good capacity he has not escaped ridicule4 ,he would have been esteemed more worthy of his high station had he never possessed it2 and is better qualified for the second than for the first place in any ,government4 ,his ministry has been more advantageous to his family than to the public1 better for this age than for posterity1 and more pernicious by bad precedents than by real grievances4 ,during his time trade has flourished1 liberty declined1 and learning gone to ruin4 ,as ,i am a man1 ,i love him2 as ,i am a scholar1 ,i hate him2 as ,i am a ,briton1 ,i calmly wish his fall4 ,and were ,i a member of either ,house ,i would give my vote for removing him from ,st4 ,james's1 but should be glad to see him retire to ,houghton ,hall1 to pass the remainder of his days in ease and pleasure40 ,the author is pleased to find that after animosities are laid1 and calumny has ceased1 the whole nation almost have returned to the same moderate sentiments with regard to this great man1 if they are not rather become more favourable to him1 by a very natural transition from one extreme to another4 ,the author would not oppose those humane sentiments towards the dead1 though he cannot forbear observing that the not paying more of our public debts was1 as hinted in this character1 a great1 and the only great error in that long administration4 #aaf ,moderate in the exercise of power1 not equitable in engrossing it4 ,,of ,,the ,,first ,,principles ,,of ,,government4 ,nothing is more surprising to those who consider human affairs with a philosophical eye1 than to see the easiness with which the many are governed by the few2 and to observe the implicit submission with which men resign their own sentiments and passions to those of their rulers4 ,when we inquire by what means this wonder is brought about1 we shall find that1 as force is always on the side of the governed1 the governors have nothing to support them but opinion4 ,it is therefore on opinion only that government is founded1 and this maxim extends to the most despotic and most military governments1 as well as to the most free and most popular4 ,the ,soldan of ,egypt1 or the ,emperor of ,rome1 might drive his harmless subjects like brute beasts against their sentiments and inclination2 but he must1 at least1 have led his mamalukes1 or prtorian bands1 like men1 by their opinion4 ,opinion is of two kinds--viz41 opinion of interest and opinion of right4 ,by opinion of interest1 ,i chiefly understand the sense of the public advantage which is reaped from government1 together with the persuasion that the particular government which is established is equally advantageous with any other that could easily be settled4 ,when this opinion prevails among the generality of a state1 or among those who have the force in their hands1 it gives great security to any government4 ,right is of two kinds--right to power and right to property4 ,what prevalence opinion of the first kind has over mankind may easily be understood by observing the attachment which all nations have to their ancient government1 and even to those names which have had the sanction of antiquity4 ,antiquity always begets the opinion of right1 and whatever disadvantageous sentiments we may entertain of mankind1 they are always found to be prodigal both of blood and treasure in the maintenance of public justice4 ,this passion we may denominate enthusiasm1 or we may give it what appellation we please2 but a politician who should overlook its influence on human affairs would prove himself but of a very limited understanding4 ,there is1 indeed1 no particular in which at first sight there may appear a greater contradiction in the frame of the human mind than the present4 ,when men act in a faction they are apt1 without any shame or remorse1 to neglect all the ties of honour and morality in order to serve their party2 and yet when a faction is formed upon a point of right or principle1 there is no occasion where men discover a greater obstinacy and a more determined sense of justice and equity4 ,the same social disposition of mankind is the cause of both these contradictory appearances4 ,it is sufficiently understood that the opinion of right to property is of the greatest moment in all matters of government4 ,a noted author has made property the foundation of all government2 and most of our political writers seem inclined to follow him in that particular4 ,this is carrying the matter too far2 but still it must be owned that the opinion of right to property has a great influence in this subject4 ,upon these three opinions1 therefore1 of public interest1 of right to power1 and of right to property1 are all governments founded1 and all authority of the few over the many4 ,there are indeed other principles which add force to these1 and determine1 limit1 or alter their operation2 such as self-interest1 fear1 and affection4 ,but still we may assert that these other principles can have no influence alone1 but suppose the antecedent influence of those opinions above mentioned4 ,they are therefore to be esteemed the secondary1 not the original principles of government4 ,for1 first1 as to self-interest1 by which ,i mean the expectation of particular rewards1 distinct from the general protection which we receive from government1 it is evident that the magistrate's authority must be antecedently established1 or at least be hoped for1 in order to produce this expectation4 ,the prospect of reward may augment the authority with regard to some particular persons1 but can never give birth to it with regard to the public4 ,men naturally look for the greatest favours from their friends and acquaintance1 and therefore the hopes of any considerable number of the state would never centre in any particular set of men if these men had no other title to magistracy1 and had no separate influence over the opinions of mankind4 ,the same observation may be extended to the other two principles of fear and affection4 ,no man would have any reason to fear the fury of a tyrant if he had no authority over any but from fear2 since as a single man his bodily force can reach but a small way1 and all further power he possesses must be founded either on our opinion or on the presumed opinion of others4 ,and though affection to wisdom and virtue in a sovereign extends very far and has great influence1 yet he must be antecedently supposed invested with a public character1 otherwise the public esteem will serve him in no stead1 nor will his virtue have any influence beyond a narrow sphere4 ,a government may endure for several ages1 though the balance of power and the balance of property do not agree4 ,this chiefly happens where any rank or order of the state has acquired a large share of the property1 but from the original constitution of the government has no share of the power4 ,under what pretext would any individual of that order assume authority in public affairs8 ,as men are commonly much attached to their ancient government1 it is not to be expected that the public would ever favour such usurpations4 ,but where the original constitution allows any share of power1 though small1 to an order of men who possess a large share of the property1 it is easy for them gradually to stretch their authority and bring the balance of power to coincide with that of property4 ,this has been the case with the ,house of ,commons in ,england4 ,most writers who have treated of the ,british ,government have supposed that as the ,house of ,commons represents all the commons of ,great ,britain1 so its weight in the scale is proportioned to the property and power of all whom it represents4 ,but this principle must not be received as absolutely true4 ,for though the people are apt to attach themselves more to the ,house of ,commons than to any other member of the constitution--that ,house being chosen by them as their representatives and as the public guardians of their liberty--yet are there instances where the ,house1 even when in opposition to the ,crown1 has not been followed by the people2 as we may particularly observe of the ,tory ,house of ,commons in the reign of ,king ,william4 ,were the members of the ,house obliged to receive instructions from their constituents1 like the ,dutch deputies1 this would entirely alter the case2 and if such immense power and riches as those of the whole commons of ,britain were brought into the scale1 it is not easy to conceive that the ,crown could either influence the multitude of people or withstand that overbalance of property4 ,it is true the ,crown has great influence over the collective body of ,britain in the elections of members2 but were this influence1 which at present is only exerted once in seven years1 to be employed in bringing over the people to every vote1 it would soon be wasted1 and no skill1 popularity or revenue1 could support it4 ,i must1 therefore1 be of opinion that an alteration in this particular would introduce a total alteration in our government1 and would soon reduce it to a pure republic2 and perhaps to a republic of no inconvenient form4 ,for though the people collected in a body like the ,roman tribes be quite unfit for government1 yet when dispersed in small bodies they are more susceptible both of reason and order2 the force of popular currents and tides is in a great measure broken2 and the public interest may be pursued with some method and constancy4 ,but it is needless to reason any further concerning a form of government which is never likely to have place in ,britain1 and which seems not to be the aim of any party amongst us4 ,let us cherish and improve our ancient government as much as possible1 without encouraging a passion for such dangerous novelties4 ,,of ,,political ,,society4 ,had every man sufficient sagacity to perceive at all times the strong interest which binds him to the observance of justice and equity1 and strength of mind sufficient to persevere in a steady adherence to a general and a distant interest1 in opposition to the allurements of present pleasure and advantage--there had never1 in that case1 been any such thing as government or political society1 but each man following his natural liberty had lived in entire peace and harmony with all others4 ,what need of positive laws where natural justice is1 of itself1 a sufficient restraint8 ,why create magistrates where there never arises any disorder or iniquity8 ,why abridge our native freedom when1 in every instance1 the utmost exertion of it is found innocent and beneficial8 ,it is evident that if government were totally useless it never could have place1 and that the sole foundation of the duty of allegiance is the advantage which it procures to society by preserving peace and order among mankind4 ,when a number of political societies are erected1 and maintain a great intercourse together1 a new set of rules are immediately discovered to be useful in that particular situation1 and accordingly take place under the title of 8,laws of ,nations40 ,of this kind are the sacredness of the persons of ambassadors1 abstaining from poisoned arms1 quarter in war1 with others of that kind1 which are plainly calculated for the advantage of states and kingdoms in their intercourse with each other4 ,the rules of justice1 such as prevail among individuals1 are not entirely suspended among political societies4 ,all princes pretend a regard to the rights of others2 and some1 no doubt1 without hypocrisy4 ,alliances and treaties are every day made between independent states1 which would only be so much waste of parchment if they were not found1 by experience1 to have some influence and authority4 ,but here is the difference between kingdoms and individuals4 ,human nature cannot by any means subsist without the association of individuals2 and that association never could have place were no regard paid to the laws of equity and justice4 ,disorder1 confusion1 the war of all against all1 are the necessary consequences of such a licentious conduct4 ,but nations can subsist without intercourse4 ,they may even subsist1 in some degree1 under a general war4 ,the observance of justice1 though useful among them1 is not guarded by so strong a necessity as among individuals2 and the moral obligation holds proportion with the usefulness4 ,all politicians will allow1 and most philosophers1 that reasons of state may1 in particular emergencies1 dispense with the rules of justice1 and invalidate any treaty or alliance where the strict observance of it would be prejudicial in a considerable degree to either of the contracting parties4 ,but nothing less than the extremest necessity1 it is confessed1 can justify individuals in a breach of promise1 ,or an invasion of the properties of others4 ,in a confederated commonwealth1 such as the ,achan ,republic of old1 or the ,swiss ,cantons and ,united ,provinces in modern times2 as the league has here a peculiar utility1 the conditions of union have a peculiar sacredness and authority1 and a violation of them would be equally criminal1 ,or even more criminal than any private injury or injustice4 ,the long and helpless infancy of man requires the combination of parents for the subsistence of their young1 and that combination requires the virtue of chastity or fidelity to the marriage-bed4 ,without such a utility1 it will readily be owned that such a virtue would never have been thought of4 ,an infidelity of this nature is much more pernicious in women than in men2 hence the laws of chastity are much stricter over the one sex than over the other4 ,these rules have all a reference to generation1 and yet women past child-bearing are no more supposed to be exempted from them than those in the flower of their youth and beauty4 ,general rules are often extended beyond the principle whence they first arise1 and this holds in all matters of taste and sentiment4 ,it is a vulgar story at ,paris that during the rage of the ,mississippi a hump-backed fellow went every day into the ,rue de ,quincempoix1 where the stock-jobbers met in great crowds1 and was well paid for allowing them to make use of his hump as a desk in order to sign their contracts upon it4 ,would the fortune which he raised by this invention make him a handsome fellow1 though it be confessed that personal beauty arises very much from ideas of utility8 ,the imagination is influenced by association of ideas1 which1 though they arise at first from the judgment1 are not easily altered by every particular exception that occurs to us4 ,to which we may add1 in the present case of chastity1 that the example of the old would be pernicious to the young1 and that women1 continually thinking that a certain time would bring them the liberty of indulgence1 would naturally advance that period and think more lightly of this whole duty so requisite to society4 ,those who live in the same family have such frequent opportunities of licence of this kind that nothing could preserve purity of manners were marriage allowed among the nearest relations1 or were any intercourse of love between them ratified by law and custom4 ,incest1 therefore1 being pernicious in a superior degree1 has also a superior turpitude and moral deformity annexed to it4 ,what is the reason why1 by the ,athenian laws1 one might marry a half-sister by the father but not by the mother8 ,plainly this3--,the manners of the ,athenians were so reserved that a man was never permitted to approach the women's apartment1 even in the same family1 unless where he visited his own mother4 ,his step-mother and her children were as much shut up from him as the women of any other family1 and there was as little danger of any criminal correspondence between them4 ,uncles and nieces1 for a like reason1 might marry at ,athens1 but neither these nor half-brothers and sisters could contract that alliance at ,rome1 where the intercourse was more open between the sexes4 ,public utility is the cause of all these variations4 ,to repeat to a man's prejudice anything that escaped him in private conversation1 or to make any such use of his private letters1 is highly blamed4 ,the free and social intercourse of minds must be extremely checked where no such rules of fidelity are established4 ,even in repeating stories1 whence we can see no ill consequences to result1 the giving one's authors is regarded as a piece of indiscretion1 if not of immorality4 ,these stories1 in passing from hand to hand and receiving all the usual variations1 frequently come about to the persons concerned and produce animosities and quarrels among people whose intentions are the most innocent and inoffensive4 ,to pry into secrets1 to open or even read the letters of others1 to play the spy upon their words and looks and actions--what habits more inconvenient in society8 what habits1 of consequence1 more blameable8 ,this principle is also the foundation of most of the laws of good manners1 a kind of lesser morality calculated for the ease of company and conversation4 ,too much or too little ceremony are both blamed1 and everything which promotes ease without an indecent familiarity is useful and laudable4 ,constancy in friendships1 attachments1 and intimacies is commonly very commendable1 and is requisite to support trust and good correspondence in society4 ,but in places of general though casual concourse1 where the pursuit of health and pleasure brings people promiscuously together1 public conveniency has dispensed with this maxim1 and custom there promotes an unreserved conversation for the time by indulging the privilege of dropping afterwards every indifferent acquaintance without breach of civility or good manners4 ,even in societies which are established on principles the most immoral and the most destructive to the interests of the general society there are required certain rules which a species of false honour as well as private interest engages the members to observe4 ,robbers and pirates1 it has often been remarked1 could not maintain their pernicious confederacy did they not establish a new distributive justice among themselves and recall those laws of equity which they have violated with the rest of mankind4 8,i hate a drinking companion10 says the ,greek proverb1 8who never forgets40 ,the follies of the last debauch should be buried in eternal oblivion1 in order to give full scope to the follies of the next4 ,among nations where an immoral gallantry1 if covered with a thin veil of mystery1 is in some degree authorized by custom1 there immediately arise a set of rules calculated for the conveniency of that attachment4 ,the famous court or parliament of love in ,provence decided formerly all difficult cases of this nature4 ,in societies for play there are laws required for the conduct of the game1 and these laws are different in each game4 ,the foundation1 ,i own1 of such societies is frivolous1 and the laws are in a great measure1 though not altogether1 capricious and arbitrary4 ,so far is there a material difference between them and the rules of justice1 fidelity and loyalty4 ,the general societies of men are absolutely requisite for the subsistence of the species1 and the public conveniency1 which regulates morals1 is inviolably established in the nature of man and of the world in which he lives4 ,the comparison1 therefore1 in these respects is very imperfect4 ,we may only learn from it the necessity of rules wherever men have any intercourse with each other4 ,they cannot even pass each other on the road without rules4 ,waggoners1 coachmen1 and postilions have principles by which they give way1 and these are chiefly founded on mutual ease and convenience4 ,sometimes also they are arbitrary1 at least dependent on a kind of capricious analogy1 like many of the reasonings of lawyers4#aag ,to carry the matter further1 we may observe that it is impossible for men so much as to murder each other without statutes and maxims and an idea of justice and honour4 ,war has its laws as well as peace1 and even that sportive kind of war carried on among wrestlers1 boxers1 cudgel-players1 gladiators1 is regulated by fixed principles4 ,common interest and utility beget infallibly a standard of right and wrong among the parties concerned4 ,,note1 ,,of ,,political ,,society4 #aag ,that the lighter machine yields to the heavier1 and in machines of the same kind1 that the empty yields to the loaded--this rule is founded on convenience4 ,that those who are going to the capital take place of those who are coming from it--this seems to be founded on some idea of the dignity of the great city1 and of the preference of the future to the past4 ,from like reasons1 among foot-walkers1 the right-hand entitles a man to the wall and prevents jostling1 which peaceable people find very disagreeable and inconvenient4 ,,alphabetical ,,arrangement ,,of ,,authorities ,,cited ,,by ,,hume4 ,,milius1 ,,paulus1 ,roman general1 ,b4,c4 #bcj-aeg4 ,defeated ,perseus of ,macedonia4 ,,agathocles1 tyrant of ,syracuse1 born circa ,b4,c4 #cfa1 died #bhi4 ,,alcibiades1 ,athenian general and statesman1 born ,b4,c4 #dej1 died ,b4,c4 #djd4 ,a disciple of ,socrates1 and noted for dissoluteness4 ,,alexander the ,great1 born ,b4,c4 #cef1 died #cbc4 ,,anacharsis1 ,scythian philosopher1 ,b4,c4 #fjj4 ,much esteemed by ,solon4 ,,anthony1 ,,mark1 ,triumvir1 born circa ,b4,c4 #he1 died ,b4,c4 #cj4 ,best known through his association with ,cleopatra4 ,,antigonus1 one of the greatest generals of ,alexander the ,great4 ,slain in #cja at ,ipsus4 ,,antipater1 minister of ,philip of ,macedon and ,alexander the ,great1 died ,b4,c4 #cai4 ,,appianus 7,appian71 belonged to the time of ,trajan1 and wrote the history of ,rome in ,greek4 ,,aratus1 general of the ,achan ,league1 born ,b4,c4 #bga1 died #bac4 ,,arbuthnot1 ,,john1 physician1 born #afge1 died #agce4 ,associate of ,pope and ,swift1 and wrote on ancient measures1 weights1 and coins4 ,,aristotle1 philosopher1 the ,stagirite1 born ,b4,c4 #chd1 died #ccb4 ,tutor of ,alexander the ,great4 ,,arrianus1 ,greek historian1 resided at ,rome in the second century1 a disciple of ,epictetus1 died circa ,a4,d4 #afj4 ,,athen,,us1 grammarian1 born in ,egypt in the third century4 ,,attalus1 ,king of ,pergamus1 died ,b4,c4 #aig4 ,,augustus1 first ,roman ,emperor1 born ,b4,c4 #fc1 grandnephew of ,julius ,csar1 died ,a4,d4 #ad4 ,c,,sar1 ,,caius ,,julius1 ,b4,c4 #ajj-dd1 ,roman warrior and administrator1 known to every schoolboy from his ,commentaries4 ,,camillus1 ,,marcus ,,furius1 died ,b4,c4 #cfe1 ,roman warrior1 six times military tribune and five times dictator4 ,,caracalla1 brother of ,geta1 whom he murdered ,a4,d4 #bab4 ,,catalina1 ,,lucius ,,sergius 7,catiline71 died ,b4,c4 #fb1 noted for his depraved habits and his conspiracy that drew from ,cicero his famous orations4 ,,cato1 ,,marcus ,,porcius1 surnamed from ,utica1 his birthplace1 ,uticensis1 died ,b4,c4 #df4 ,,cato1 the elder1 born ,b4,c4 #bcd1 died #adi1 noted for his courage and temperance4 ,,cicero1 ,,marcus ,,tullius1 ,roman orator1 born ,b4,c4 #ajf1 died #dc4 ,,claudius1 ,roman ,emperor1 born ,b4,c4 #i1 died ,a4,d4 #ed4 ,visited ,britain ,a4,d4 #dc4 ,,cleomenes1 ,king of ,sparta1 died ,b4,c4 #bbj4 ,,clodius1 enemy of ,cicero1 died ,b4,c4 #eb4 ,used to go about ,rome with an intimidating band of gladiators4 ,,columella1 native of ,spain1 resided at ,rome in the reign of ,claudius1 ,a4,d4 #da-ed4 ,,commodus1 ,roman ,emperor1 son of ,marcus ,aurelius1 born ,a4,d4 #afa1 died #aib4 ,,ctesiphon4 ,in his defence ,demosthenes delivered his famous oration 8,on the ,crown0 in ,b4,c4 #ccj4 ,,demetrius ,,phalereus1 ,greek orator and statesman1 born ,b4,c4 #cde1 died circa #bhc4 ,,demosthenes1 ,greek orator1 ,b4,c4 #che-cbb1 whose speeches against the encroachments of ,philip of ,macedon have given the general term 8philippics0 to powerful invective4 ,,dion ,,cassius1 circa #bjj-bej1 wrote history of ,rome in ,greek4 ,,dionysius ,,halicarnass,,us1 ,greek rhetorician and historian1 born ,b4,c4 #bi1 died ,b4,c4 #g4 ,chief work1 ,roman ,archology4 ,,dionysius1 the elder1 tyrant of ,syracuse1 ,b4,c4 #dcj-cfg2 besides being a warrior1 was a patron of literary men and artists4 ,built ,lautumi1 the famous prison1 called also the 8,ear of ,dionysius40 ,,diodorus ,,siculus1 wrote a universal history1 flourished circa ,b4,c4 #ej4 ,,drusus1 ,roman consul1 born ,b4,c4 #ch4 ,,epaminondas1 ,theban statesman and general1 died ,b4,c4 #cfb4 ,,florus1 ,roman historian1 lived in the reigns of ,trajan and ,hadrian4 ,,folard1 ,,jean ,,charles1 military tactician1 born at ,avignon #affi1 died #ageb1 published an edition of ,polybius4 ,,garcilasso ,,de ,,la ,,vega1 called the ,inca because descended from the royal family of ,peru 7#aecj-afbj71 wrote ,history of ,peru and ,history of ,florida4 ,,gee1 ,,joshua1 eighteenth-century ,london merchant1 wrote ,trade and ,navigation of ,great ,britain 7#agcj74 ,,germanicus1 son of ,nero1 died ,a4,d4 #ai1 aged #cd4 ,,geta1 second son of ,emperor ,severus1 born ,a4,d4 #ahi1 died #bab4 ,,guicciardini1 ,,francisco1 ,italian historian 7#adhb-aedj74 ,,hannibal1 great ,carthaginian general1 born ,b4,c4 #bdg1 died #ahc4 ,,heliogabalus1 ,roman emperor1 born circa ,a4,d4 #bje1 died #bbb4 ,,herodian1 flourished in the third century1 wrote in ,greek a history of the period from the death of ,marcus ,aurelius to #bch4 ,,hesiod1 one of the earliest ,greek poets1 supposed to have flourished in the eighth century ,b4,c4 8,works and ,days0 is his best known poem4 ,,hiero ,,ii41 ,king of ,syracuse1 died ,b4,c4 #bae1 aged #ib4 ,archimedes lived in his reign4 ,,hirtius1 ,roman consul1 contemporary with ,csar and ,cicero2 is said to be the author of the eighth book of ,csar's ,commentaries4 ,,hyperides1 ,athenian orator1 died ,b4,c4 #cbb1 disciple of ,plato4 ,,isocrates1 ,greek orator1 born ,b4,c4 #dcf1 died #cch4 ,,justin1 a ,latin historian1 lived in second or third century1 epitomized ,histori ,philippic of ,trogus ,pompeius1 a native of ,gaul4 ,,livius1 ,,titus 7,livy71 historian of ,rome 7,b4,c4 #ei-ag74 ,of his #adb books1 only #ce have been preserved4 ,,longinus1 ,,dionysius1 ,greek philosopher1 died ,b4,c4 #bgc4 ,his extensive knowledge earned him the title of 8,the living library40 ,,lucian1 ,greek writer1 lived in the time of ,marcus ,aurelius4 ,,lycurgus1 ,spartan lawgiver1 whose severe regulations made the ,spartans a race of warriors1 is said to have flourished in the ninth century ,b4,c4 ,,lysias1 ,greek orator1 born ,b4,c4 #deh1 died #cgc1 wrote #bcj orations1 of which only #ce remain4 ,,machiavelli1 ,florentine statesman and historian1 born #adfi1 died #aebg4 ,,maillet1 ,french writer1 born #afef1 died #agch1 consul in ,egypt and at ,leghorn4 ,,martial1 ,roman poet1 born ,a4,d4 #dc4 ,,massinissa1 ,king of ,numidia1 born ,b4,c4 #bch1 died #adh4 ,,mazarin1 ,,jules1 cardinal1 and first minister of ,louis ,,xiv4 7#afjb-fa74 ,,nabis1 ,spartan tyrant1 died ,b4,c4 #aib1 noted for his cruelty4 ,,nero1 ,roman emperor1 born ,a4,d4 #cg1 died #fg4 ,,octavius1 became ,emperor ,augustus4 ,,ovidius ,,publius ,,naso 7,ovid71 ,roman poet1 ,b4,c4 #dc-;,a4,d4 #ah1 enjoyed the patronage of ,augustus until banished ,a4,d4 #h4 ,chief works--,amores1 ,de ,arte ,amandi1 ,fasti4 ,,paterculus1 ,roman historian1 born circa ,b4,c4 #ai1 died ,a4,d4 #ca4 ,,pausanias1 ,greek writer1 flourished circa ,a4,d4 #abj-adj4 ,,perseus1 or ,,perses1 last ,king of ,macedonia4 ,ascended the throne ,b4,c4 #agh4 ,,pescenius ,,niger1 became ,roman ,emperor in #aic4 ,,petronius1 died ,a4,d4 #ff1 ,roman author1 lived at the court of ,nero1 and acquired celebrity for his licentiousness4 ,,philip of ,macedon1 born #chb1 assassinated #ccf4 ,,plato1 born ,b4,c4 #dbi1 died #cdg4 ,,plautus1 ,roman comedy writer1 born circa ,b4,c4 #bee1 died #ahd4 ,,pliny4 ,there were two ,plinys--one born ,a4,d4 #bc1 the other1 nephew of the preceding1 ,a4,d4 #fb4 ,the former was a naturalist2 the latter a pleader and soldier1 whose chief writings are his account of the ,christians and ,epistles4 ,,plutarch1 celebrated biographer1 died circa ,b4,c4 #abj4 ,,polybius1 ,greek historian1 ,b4,c4 #bjd-abb4 ,his history deals with ,greece and ,rome during the period #bbj-adf1 and is of great importance4 ,,pompey the younger1 born ,b4,c4 #ge4 ,,prusias1 ,king of ,bithynia1 circa ,b4,c4 #aij4 ,,pyrrhus1 ,king of ,epirus1 ,b4,c4 #cah-bgb1 one of the greatest warriors of ancient days4 ,,sallustius1 ,,crispus ,,caius1 ,roman historian1 ,b4,c4 #hf-ce1 excluded from the ,senate on account of his debauchery4 ,,seneca1 ,,lucius ,,ann,,us1 ,roman philosopher1 ,a4,d4 #c-fe1 belonged to the ,stoic school1 and was believed to have been acquainted with ,st4 ,paul4 ,,servius ,,tullius1 sixth ,king of ,rome1 changed the constitution so that the plebs obtained political power4 ,,severus1 ,roman ,emperor1 born ,a4,d4 #adf1 died at ,york #baa4 ,wrote history of his own reign4 ,,solon1 celebrated ,athenian legislator1 died circa ,b4,c4 #eeh1 aged eighty4 ,established the principle that property1 not birth1 should entitle to state honours and offices4 ,,strabo1 ,greek historian and geographer1 born circa ,b4,c4 #ej1 died circa ,a4,d4 #bj4 ,his chief work in seventeen books gives a description of different countries1 manners and customs1 particulars of their history1 and eminent men4 ,,suetonius1 ,roman historian1 born circa ,a4,d4 #ge1 died circa #afj4 ,,tacitus1 ,roman historian1 born circa ,a4,d4 #ed4 ,his ,annales cover the period ,a4,d4 #ad-fh4 ,,theocritus1 ,greek poet1 lived third century ,b4,c41 considered the father of pastoral poetry4 ,visited the court of ,ptolemus ,soter4 ,,thrasybulus1 ,athenian naval commander1 died ,b4,c4 #chi4 ,,thucydides1 ,greek historian1 born ,b4,c4 #dga1 died circa #dja4 ,his great work1 the history of the ,peloponnesian ,war1 is the first example of philosophical history4 ,,tiberius1 ,,claudius ,,nero1 ,roman ,emperor1 ,b4,c4 #db-;,a4,d4 #cg1 succeeded ,augustus ,a4,d4 #ad4 ,,timoleon1 ,greek general1 born in ,corinth circa ,b4,c4 #djj1 died #ccg4 ,resided at ,syracuse4 ,,tissaphernes1 ,persian satrap1 died ,b4,c4 #cie4 ,an intimate friend of ,alcibiades4 ,,trajanus1 ,,marcus ,,ulpius 7,trajan71 ,roman ,emperor1 ,a4,d4 #eb-aag4 ,succeeded to the throne in #ih1 and surnamed by the ,senate 8,optimus40 ,,varro1 ,roman writer1 born ,b4,c4 #aaf1 died #bh4 ,reputed the most learned among the ,romans1 and wrote #dij books4 ,,vauban1 ,s,,bastien ,,le ,,prestre ,,de1 ,marshal of ,france and great military engineer1 #afcc-agjg4 ,published works on sieges1 frontiers1 etc41 and left twelve folio volumes of ,,ms41 and was pronounced the most upright1 simple1 true1 and modest man of his age4 ,,vespasian1 ,,titus ,,flavius1 ,roman ,emperor1 born ,a4,d4 #i1 died #gi4 ,,vopiscus1 ,syracusan1 flourished circa ,a4,d4 #cjd4 ,wrote histories4 ,,xenophon1 ,greek historian1 born circa ,b4,c4 #dej1 a disciple and friend of ,socrates4 ,,the ,,end4 ,,the ,,walter ,,scott ,,publishing ,,co41 ,,ltd41 ,,felling-,,on-,,tyne4 ,,advertisements1 from the ,walter ,scott ,publishing ,company1 ,limited1 ,london and ,felling-on-,tyne4 ,,the ,,world',s ,,literary ,,masterpieces4 ,the ,scott ,library4 ,maroon ,cloth1 ,gilt4 ,price #as4 net per ,volume4 ,,volumes ,,already ,,issued-- #a ,malory's ,romance of ,king ,arthur and the ,quest of the ,holy ,grail4 ,edited by ,ernest ,rhys4 #b ,thoreau's ,walden4 ,with ,introductory ,note by ,will ,h4 ,dircks4 #c ,thoreau's 8,week40 ,with ,prefatory ,note by ,will ,h4 ,dircks4 #d ,thoreau's ,essays4 ,edited1 ,with an ,introduction1 by ,will ,h4 ,dircks4 #e ,confessions of an ,english ,opium-eater1 ,etc4 ,by ,thomas ,de ,quincey4 ,with ,introductory ,note by ,william ,sharp4 #f ,landor's ,imaginary ,conversations4 ,selected1 with ,introduction1 by ,havelock ,ellis4 #g ,plutarch's ,lives 7,langhorne74 ,with ,introductory ,note by ,b4 ,j4 ,snell1 ,m4,a4 #h ,browne's ,religio ,medici1 etc4 ,with ,introduction by ,j4 ,addington ,symonds4 #i ,shelley's ,essays and ,letters4 ,edited1 with ,introductory ,note1 by ,ernest ,rhys4 #aj ,swift's ,prose ,writings4 ,chosen and ,arranged1 with ,introduction1 by ,walter ,lewin4 #aa ,my ,study ,windows4 ,by ,james ,russell ,lowell4 ,with ,introduction by ,r4 ,garnett1 ,,ll4,d4 #ab ,lowell's ,essays on the ,english ,poets4 ,with a new ,introduction by ,mr4 ,lowell4 #ac ,the ,biglow ,papers4 ,by ,james ,russell ,lowell4 ,with a ,prefatory ,note by ,ernest ,rhys4 #ad ,great ,english ,painters4 ,selected from ,cunningham's ,lives4 ,edited by ,william ,sharp4 #ae ,byron's ,letters and ,journals4 ,selected1 with ,introduction1 by ,mathilde ,blind4 #af ,leigh ,hunt's ,essays4 ,with ,introduction and ,notes by ,arthur ,symons4 #ag ,longfellow's 8,hyperion10 8,kavanagh10 and 8,the ,trouveres40 ,with ,introduction by ,w4 ,tirebuck4 #ah ,great ,musical ,composers4 by ,g4 ,f4 ,ferris4 ,edited1 with ,introduction1 by ,mrs4 ,william ,sharp4 #ai ,the ,meditations of ,marcus ,aurelius4 ,edited by ,alice ,zimmern4 #bj ,the ,teaching of ,epictetus4 ,translated from the ,greek1 with ,introduction and ,notes1 by ,t4 ,w4 ,rolleston4 #ba ,selections from ,seneca4 ,with ,introduction by ,walter ,clode4 #bb ,specimen ,days in ,america4 ,by ,walt ,whitman4 ,revised by the ,author1 with fresh ,preface4 #bc ,democratic ,vistas1 and ,other ,papers4 ,by ,walt ,whitman4 7,published by arrangement with the ,author47 #bd ,white's ,natural ,history of ,selborne1 with a ,preface by ,richard ,jefferies4 #be ,defoe's ,captain ,singleton4 ,edited1 with ,introduction1 by ,h4 ,halliday ,sparling4 #bf ,mazzini's ,essays3 ,literary1 ,political1 and ,religious4 ,with ,introduction by ,william ,clarke4 #bg ,prose ,writings of ,heine4 ,with ,introduction by ,havelock ,ellis4 #bh ,reynolds's ,discourses4 ,with ,introduction by ,helen ,zimmern4 #bi ,papers of ,steele and ,addison4 ,edited by ,walter ,lewin4 #cj ,burns's ,letters4 ,selected and ,arranged1 with ,introduction1 by ,j4 ,logie ,robertson1 ,m4,a4 #ca ,volsunga ,saga4 ,william ,morris4 ,with ,introduction by ,h4 ,h4 ,sparling4 #cb ,sartor ,resartus4 ,by ,thomas ,carlyle4 ,with ,introduction by ,ernest ,rhys4 #cc ,select ,writings of ,emerson with ,introduction by ,percival ,chubb4 #cd ,autobiography of ,lord ,herbert4 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,will ,h4 ,dircks4 #ce ,english ,prose1 ,from ,maundeville to ,thackeray4 ,chosen and ,edited by ,arthur ,galton4 #cf ,the ,pillars of ,society1 and ,other ,plays4 ,by ,henrik ,ibsen4 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,havelock ,ellis4 #cg ,irish ,fairy and ,folk ,tales4 ,edited and ,selected by ,w4 ,b4 ,yeats4 #ch ,essays of ,dr4 ,johnson1 with ,biographical ,introduction and ,notes by ,stuart ,j4 ,reid4 #ci ,essays of ,william ,hazlitt4 ,selected and ,edited1 with ,introduction and ,notes1 by ,frank ,carr4 #dj ,landor's ,pentameron1 and ,other ,imaginary ,conversations4 ,edited1 with a ,preface1 by ,h4 ,ellis4 #da ,poe's ,tales and ,essays4 ,edited1 with ,introduction1 by ,ernest ,rhys4 #db ,vicar of ,wakefield4 ,by ,oliver ,goldsmith4 ,edited1 with ,preface1 by ,ernest ,rhys4 #dc ,political ,orations1 from ,wentworth to ,macaulay4 ,edited1 with ,introduction1 by ,william ,clarke4 #dd ,the ,autocrat of the ,breakfast-table4 ,by ,oliver ,wendell ,holmes4 #de ,the ,poet at the ,breakfast-table4 ,by ,oliver ,wendell ,holmes4 #df ,the ,professor at the ,breakfast-table4 ,by ,oliver ,wendell ,holmes4 #dg ,lord ,chesterfield's ,letters to his ,son4 ,selected1 with ,introduction1 by ,charles ,sayle4 #dh ,stories from ,carleton4 ,selected1 with ,introduction1 by ,w4 ,yeats4 #di ,jane ,eyre4 ,by ,charlotte ,bront4 ,edited by ,clement ,k4 ,shorter4 #ej ,elizabethan ,england4 ,edited by ,lothrop ,withington1 with a ,preface by ,dr4 ,furnivall4 #ea ,the ,prose ,writings of ,thomas ,davis4 ,edited by ,t4 ,w4 ,rolleston4 #eb ,spence's ,anecdotes4 ,a ,selection4 ,edited1 with an ,introduction and ,notes1 by ,john ,underhill4 #ec ,more's ,utopia1 and ,life of ,edward ,v4 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,maurice ,adams4 #ed ,sadi's ,gulistan1 or ,flower ,garden4 ,translated1 with an ,essay1 by ,james ,ross4 #ee ,english ,fairy and ,folk ,tales4 ,edited by ,e4 ,sidney ,hartland4 #ef ,northern ,studies4 ,by ,edmund ,gosse4 ,with a ,note by ,ernest ,rhys4 #eg ,early ,reviews of ,great ,writers4 ,edited by ,e4 ,stevenson4 #eh ,aristotle's ,ethics4 ,with ,george ,henry ,lewes's ,essay on ,aristotle prefixed4 #ei ,landor's ,pericles and ,aspasia4 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,havelock ,ellis4 #fj ,annals of ,tacitus4 ,thomas ,gordon's ,translation4 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,arthur ,galton4 #fa ,essays of ,elia4 ,by ,charles ,lamb4 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,ernest ,rhys4 #fb ,balzac's ,shorter ,stories4 ,translated by ,william ,wilson and the ,count ,stenbock4 #fc ,comedies of de ,musset4 ,edited1 with an ,introductory ,note1 by ,s4 ,l4 ,gwynn4 #fd ,coral ,reefs4 ,by ,charles ,darwin4 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,dr4 ,j4 ,w4 ,williams4 #fe ,sheridan's ,plays4 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,rudolf ,dircks4 #ff ,our ,village4 ,by ,miss ,mitford4 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,ernest ,rhys4 #fg ,master ,humphrey's ,clock1 and other ,stories4 ,by ,charles ,dickens4 ,with ,introduction by ,frank ,t4 ,marzials4 #fh ,oxford ,movement1 ,the4 ,being a ,selection from 8,tracts for the ,times40 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,william ,g4 ,hutchison4 #fi ,essays and ,papers by ,douglas ,jerrold4 ,edited by ,walter ,jerrold4 #gj ,vindication of the ,rights of ,woman4 ,by ,mary ,wollstonecraft4 ,introduction by ,mrs4 ,e4 ,robins ,pennell4 #ga 8,the ,athenian ,oracle40 ,a ,selection4 ,edited by ,john ,underhill1 with ,prefatory ,note by ,walter ,besant4 #gb ,essays of ,sainte-beuve4 ,translated and ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,elizabeth ,lee4 #gc ,selections from ,plato4 ,from the translation of ,sydenham and ,taylor4 ,edited by ,t4 ,w4 ,rolleston4 #gd ,heine's ,italian ,travel ,sketches1 etc4 ,translated by ,elizabeth ,a4 ,sharp4 ,with an ,introduction from the ,french of ,theophile ,gautier4 #ge ,schiller's ,maid of ,orleans4 ,translated1 with an ,introduction1 by ,major-,general ,patrick ,maxwell4 #gf ,selections from ,sydney ,smith4 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,ernest ,rhys4 #gg ,the ,new ,spirit4 ,by ,havelock ,ellis4 #gh ,the ,book of ,marvellous ,adventures4 ,from the 8,morte d',arthur40 ,edited by ,ernest ,rhys4 ,this1 together with ,no4 #a1 forms the complete 8,morte d',arthur40 #gi ,essays and ,aphorisms4 ,by ,sir ,arthur ,helps4 ,with an ,introduction by ,e4 ,a4 ,helps4 #hj ,essays of ,montaigne4 ,selected1 with a ,prefatory ,note1 by ,percival ,chubb4 #ha ,the ,luck of ,barry ,lyndon4 ,by ,w4 ,m4 ,thackeray4 ,edited by ,f4 ,t4 ,marzials4 #hb ,schiller's ,william ,tell4 ,translated1 with an ,introduction1 by ,major-,general ,patrick ,maxwell4 #hc ,carlyle's ,essays on ,german ,literature4 ,with an ,introduction by ,ernest ,rhys4 #hd ,plays and ,dramatic ,essays of ,charles ,lamb4 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,rudolf ,dircks4 #he ,the ,prose of ,wordsworth4 ,selected and ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,professor ,william ,knight4 #hf ,essays1 ,dialogues1 and ,thoughts of ,count ,giacomo ,leopardi4 ,translated1 with an ,introduction and ,notes1 by ,major-,general ,patrick ,maxwell4 #hg ,the ,inspector-general4 ,a ,russian ,comedy4 ,by ,nikolai ,v4 ,gogol4 ,translated from the original1 with an ,introduction and ,notes1 by ,arthur ,a4 ,sykes4 #hh ,essays and ,apothegms of ,francis1 ,lord ,bacon4 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,john ,buchan4 #hi ,prose of ,milton4 ,selected and ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,richard ,garnett1 ,,ll4,d4 #ij ,the ,republic of ,plato4 ,translated by ,thomas ,taylor1 with an ,introduction by ,theodore ,wratislaw4 #ia ,passages from ,froissart4 ,with an ,introduction by ,frank ,t4 ,marzials4 #ib ,the ,prose and ,table ,talk of ,coleridge4 ,edited by ,will ,h4 ,dircks4 #ic ,heine in ,art and ,letters4 ,translated by ,elizabeth ,a4 ,sharp4 #id ,selected ,essays of de ,quincey4 ,with an ,introduction by ,sir ,george ,douglas1 ,bart4 #ie ,vasari's ,lives of ,italian ,painters4 ,selected and ,prefaced by ,havelock ,ellis4 #if ,laocoon1 and other ,prose ,writings of ,lessing4 ,a new ,translation by ,w4 ,b4 ,rnnfeldt4 #ig ,pelleas and ,melisanda1 and the ,sightless4 ,two ,plays by ,maurice ,maeterlinck4 ,translated from the ,french by ,laurence ,alma ,tadema4 #ih ,the ,complete ,angler of ,walton and ,cotton4 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,charles ,hill ,dick4 #ii ,lessing's ,nathan the ,wise4 ,translated by ,major-,general ,patrick ,maxwell4 #ajj ,the ,poetry of the ,celtic ,races1 and other ,essays of ,ernest ,renan4 ,translated by ,w4 ,g4 ,hutchison4 #aja ,criticisms1 ,reflections1 and ,maxims of ,goethe4 ,translated1 with an ,introduction1 by ,w4 ,b4 ,rnnfeldt4 #ajb ,essays of ,schopenhauer4 ,translated by ,mrs4 ,rudolf ,dircks4 ,with an ,introduction4 #ajc ,renan's ,life of ,jesus4 ,translated1 with an ,introduction1 by ,william ,g4 ,hutchison4 #ajd ,the ,confessions of ,saint ,augustine4 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,arthur ,symons4 #aje ,the ,principles of ,success in ,literature4 ,by ,george ,henry ,lewes4 ,edited by ,t4 ,sharper ,knowlson4 #ajf ,the ,lives of ,dr4 ,john ,donne1 ,sir ,henry ,wotton1 ,mr4 ,richard ,hooker1 ,mr4 ,george ,herbert1 and ,dr4 ,robert ,sanderson4 ,by ,izaac ,walton4 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,charles ,hill ,dick4 #ajh ,renan's ,antichrist4 ,translated1 with an ,introduction1 by ,w4 ,g4 ,hutchison4 #aji ,orations of ,cicero4 ,selected and ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,fred4 ,w4 ,norris4 #aaj ,reflections on the ,revolution in ,france4 ,by ,edmund ,burke4 ,with an ,introduction by ,george ,sampson4 #aaa ,the ,letters of the ,younger ,pliny4 ,series ,i4 ,translated1 with an ,introductory ,essay1 by ,john ,b4 ,firth1 ,b4,a41 ,late ,scholar of ,queen's ,college1 ,oxford4 #aab ,the ,letters of the ,younger ,pliny4 ,series ,,ii4 ,translated by ,john ,b4 ,firth1 ,b4,a4 #aac ,selected ,thoughts of ,blaise ,pascal4 ,translated1 with an ,introduction and ,notes1 by ,gertrude ,burford ,rawlings4 #aad ,scots ,essayists3 from ,stirling to ,stevenson1 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,oliphant ,smeaton4 #aae ,on ,liberty4 ,by ,john ,stuart ,mill4 ,with an ,introduction by ,w4 ,l4 ,courtney4 #aaf ,the ,discourse on ,method and ,metaphysical ,meditations of ,ren ,descartes4 ,translated1 with ,introduction1 by ,gertrude ,b4 ,rawlings4 #aag ,klidsa's ,sakuntal1 ,etc4 ,edited1 ,with ,an ,introduction1 by ,t4 ,holme4 #aah ,newman's ,university ,sketches4 ,edited1 with ,introduction1 by ,george ,sampson4 #aai ,newman's ,select ,essays4 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,george ,sampson4 #abj ,renan's ,marcus ,aurelius4 ,translated1 with an ,introduction1 by ,william ,g4 ,hutchison4 #aba ,froude's ,nemesis of ,faith4 ,with an ,introduction by ,william ,g4 ,hutchison4 #abb ,what is ,art8 ,by ,leo ,tolstoy4 ,translated from the ,original ,russian ,,ms41 with ,introduction1 by ,alymer ,maude4 #abc ,hume's ,political ,essays4 ,edited1 with an ,introduction1 by ,w4 ,b4 ,robertson4 ,,other ,,volumes ,,in ,,preparation4 ,,in ,,one ,,volume4 ,crown #hvo1 ,cloth1 ,richly ,gilt4 ,price #cs4 #f;d4 ,musicians ,wit1 ,humour1 and ,anecdote3 ,being on ,dits of ,composers1 ,singers1 and ,instrumentalists of ,all ,times4 ,by ,frederick ,j4 ,crowest1 ,author of 8,the ,great ,tone ,poets10 8,the ,story of ,british ,music02 ,editor of 8,the ,master ,musicians0 ,series1 etc41 etc4 ,profusely ,illustrated with ,quaint ,drawings by ,j4 ,p4 ,donne4 ,,what ,,the ,,reviewers ,,say3-- 8,it is one of those delightful medleys of anecdote of all times1 seasons1 and persons1 in every page of which there is a new specimen of humour1 strange adventure1 and quaint saying40--,t4 ,p4 ,o',connor in ,t4 ,p4's ,weekly4 8,a remarkable collection of good stories which must have taken years of perseverance to get together40--,morning ,leader4 8,a book which should prove acceptable to two large sections of the public--those who are interested in musicians and those who have an adequate sense of the comic40--,globe4 ,the ,makers of ,british ,art4 ,a ,,new ,,series ,,of ,,monographs ,,of ,,british ,,painters4 ,each volume illustrated with ,twenty ,full-page ,reproductions and a ,photogravure ,portrait4 ,square ,crown #hvo1 ,cloth1 ,gilt ,top1 ,deckled ,edges1 #cs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,volumes ,,ready4 ,landseer1 ,sir ,edwin4 ,by the ,editor4 8,this little volume may rank as the most complete account of ,landseer that the world is likely to possess40--,times4 ,reynolds1 ,sir ,joshua4 ,by ,elsa d',esterre-,keeling4 8,to the series entitled #8,the ,makers of ,british ,art' ,miss ,elsa d',esterre-,keeling contributes an admirable little volume on ,sir ,joshua ,reynolds4 ,miss ,keeling's style is sprightly and epigrammatic1 and her judgments are well considered40--,daily ,telegraph4 ,turner1 ,j4 ,m4 ,w4 ,by ,robert ,chignell1 ,author of 8,the ,life and ,paintings of ,vicat ,cole1 ,r4,a40 ,romney1 ,george4 ,by ,sir ,herbert ,maxwell1 ,bart41 ,f4,r4,s41 ,m4,p4 8,likely to remain the best account of the painter's life40--,athenum4 ,wilkie1 ,sir ,david4 ,by ,professor ,bayne4 ,constable1 ,john4 ,by the ,right ,hon4 ,lord ,windsor4 ,raeburn1 ,sir ,henry4 ,by ,edward ,pinnington4 ,gainsborough1 ,thomas4 ,by ,a4 ,e4 ,fletcher4 ,hogarth1 ,william4 ,by ,prof4 ,g4 ,baldwin ,brown4 ,moore1 ,henry4 ,by ,frank ,j4 ,maclean4 ,,in ,,preparation4 ,,millais--,,leighton--,,morland4 ,crown #hvo1 about #cej pp4 each1 ,cloth ,cover1 #b_/f per ,vol42 ,half-,polished ,morocco1 ,gilt ,top1 #es4 ,count ,tolstoy's ,works4 ,the following ,volumes are already issued-- ,a ,russian ,proprietor4 ,the ,cossacks4 ,ivan ,ilyitch1 and ,other ,stories4 ,my ,religion4 ,life4 ,my ,confession4 ,childhood1 ,boyhood1 ,youth4 ,the ,physiology of ,war4 ,anna ,karnina4 #c_/f4 ,what to ,do8 ,war and ,peace4 7#d vols47 ,the ,long ,exile1 etc4 ,sevastopol4 ,the ,kreutzer ,sonata1 and ,family ,happiness4 ,the ,kingdom of ,god ,is ,within ,you4 ,work ,while ,ye ,have the ,light4 ,the ,gospel in ,brief4 ,uniform with the above-- ,impressions of ,russia4 ,by ,dr4 ,georg ,brandes4 ,post #dto1 ,cloth1 ,price #as4 ,patriotism and ,christianity4 ,to which is appended a ,reply to ,criticisms of the ,work4 ,by ,count ,tolstoy4 #a_/ ,booklets by ,count ,tolstoy4 ,bound in ,white ,grained ,boards1 with ,gilt ,lettering4 ,where ,love is1 ,there ,god is ,also4 ,the ,two ,pilgrims4 ,what ,men ,live by4 ,the ,godson4 ,if ,you ,neglect the ,fire1 ,you ,don't ,put it ,out4 ,what ,shall it ,profit a ,man8 #b_/ ,booklets by ,count ,tolstoy4 ,new ,editions1 ,revised4 ,small #abmo1 ,cloth1 with ,embossed ,design on ,cover1 each containing ,two ,stories by ,count ,tolstoy1 and ,two ,drawings by ,h4 ,r4 ,millar4 ,in ,box1 ,price #bs4 each4 ,volume ,i4 contains-- ,where ,love is1 ,there ,god is ,also4 ,the ,godson4 ,volume ,,ii4 contains-- ,what ,men ,live by4 ,what ,shall it ,profit a ,man8 ,volume ,,iii4 contains-- ,the ,two ,pilgrims4 ,if ,you ,neglect the ,fire1 ,you ,don't ,put it ,out4 ,volume ,,iv4 contains-- ,master and ,man4 ,volume ,v4 contains-- ,tolstoy's ,parables4 ,crown #hvo1 ,cloth1 #cs4 #f;d4 each2 some vols41 #fs4 ,the ,contemporary ,science ,series4 ,edited by ,havelock ,ellis4 ,illustrated ,vols4 between #cjj and #djj pp4 each4 ,evolution of ,sex4 ,by ,professors ,geddes and ,thomson4 #fs4 ,electricity in ,modern ,life4 ,by ,g4 ,w4 de ,tunzelmann4 ,the ,origin of the ,aryans4 ,by ,dr4 ,taylor4 ,physiognomy and ,expression4 ,by ,p4 ,mantegazza4 ,evolution and ,disease4 ,by ,j4 ,b4 ,sutton4 ,the ,village ,community4 ,by ,g4 ,l4 ,gomme4 ,the ,criminal4 ,by ,havelock ,ellis4 ,new ,edition4 #fs4 ,sanity and ,insanity4 ,by ,dr4 ,c4 ,mercier4 ,hypnotism4 ,by ,dr4 ,albert ,moll 7,berlin74 ,manual ,training4 ,by ,dr4 ,woodward 7,st4 ,louis74 ,science of ,fairy ,tales4 ,by ,e4 ,s4 ,hartland4 ,primitive ,folk4 ,by ,elie ,reclus4 ,evolution of ,marriage4 ,by ,ch4 ,letourneau4 ,bacteria and ,their ,products4 ,by ,dr4 ,woodhead4 ,education and ,heredity4 ,by ,j4 ,m4 ,guyau4 ,the ,man of ,genius4 ,by ,prof4 ,lombroso4 ,property3 ,its ,origin4 ,by ,ch4 ,letourneau4 ,volcanoes ,past and ,present4 ,by ,prof4 ,hull4 ,public ,health ,problems4 ,by ,dr4 ,j4 ,f4 ,sykes4 ,modern ,meteorology4 ,by ,frank ,waldo1 ,ph4,d4 ,the ,germ-plasm4 ,by ,professor ,weismann4 #fs4 ,the ,industries of ,animals4 ,by ,f4 ,houssay4 ,man and ,woman4 ,by ,havelock ,ellis4 #fs4 ,modern ,capitalism4 ,by ,john ,a4 ,hobson1 ,m4,a4 ,thought-,transference4 ,by ,f4 ,podmore1 ,m4,a4 ,comparative ,psychology4 ,by ,prof4 ,c4 ,l4 ,morgan1 ,f4,r4,s4 #fs4 ,the ,origins of ,invention4 ,by ,o4 ,t4 ,mason4 ,the ,growth of the ,brain4 ,by ,h4 ,h4 ,donaldson4 ,evolution in ,art4 ,by ,prof4 ,a4 ,c4 ,haddon1 ,f4,r4,s4 ,hallucinations and ,illusions4 ,by ,e4 ,parish4 #fs4 ,psychology of the ,emotions4 ,by ,prof4 ,ribot4 #fs4 ,the ,new ,psychology4 ,by ,dr4 ,e4 ,w4 ,scripture4 #fs4 ,sleep3 ,its ,physiology1 ,pathology1 ,hygiene1 and ,psychology4 ,by ,marie de ,manacne4 ,the ,natural ,history of ,digestion4 ,by ,a4 ,lockhart ,gillespie1 ,m4,d41 ,f4,r4,c4,p4 ,ed41 ,f4,r4,s4 ,ed4 #fs4 ,degeneracy3 ,its ,causes1 ,signs1 and ,results4 ,by ,prof4 ,eugene ,s4 ,talbot1 ,m4,d41 ,chicago4 #fs4 ,the ,history of the ,european ,fauna4 ,by ,r4 ,f4 ,scharff1 ,b4,sc41 ,ph4,d41 ,f4,z4,s4 #fs4 ,the ,races of ,man3 ,a ,sketch of ,ethnography and ,anthropology4 ,by ,j4 ,deniker4 #fs4 ,the ,psychology of ,religion4 ,by ,prof4 ,starbuck4 #fs4 ,the ,child4 ,by ,alexander ,francis ,chamberlain1 ,m4,a41 ,ph4,d4 #fs4 ,the ,mediterranean ,race4 ,by ,prof4 ,sergi4 #fs4 ,the ,study of ,religion4 ,by ,morris ,jastrow1 ,jun41 ,ph4,d4 #fs4 ,history of ,geology and ,palontology4 ,by ,prof4 ,karl ,alfred von ,zittel1 ,munich4 #fs4 ,the ,making of ,citizens3 ,a ,study in ,comparative ,education4 ,by ,r4 ,e4 ,hughes1 ,m4,a4 #fs4 ,morals3 ,a ,treatise on the ,psycho-,sociological ,bases of ,ethics4 ,by ,prof4 ,g4 ,l4 ,duprat4 ,earthquakes1 a ,study of ,recent4 ,by ,prof4 ,charles ,davison1 ,d4,sc41 ,f4,g4,s4 #fs4 ,,special ,,edition ,,of ,,the ,,canterbury ,,poets4 ,square #hvo1 ,cloth1 ,gilt ,top ,elegant1 ,price #bs4 ,each ,volume with a ,frontispiece in ,photogravure4 ,christian ,year4 ,with ,portrait of ,john ,keble4 ,longfellow4 ,with ,portrait of ,longfellow4 ,shelley4 ,with ,portrait of ,shelley4 ,wordsworth4 ,with ,portrait of ,wordsworth4 ,whittier4 ,with ,portrait of ,whittier4 ,burns4 ,songs with ,portrait of ,burns1 and ,view of 8,the ,auld ,brig o' ,doon40 ,burns4 ,poems with ,portrait of ,burns1 and ,view of 8,the ,auld ,brig o' ,doon40 ,keats4 ,with ,portrait of ,keats4 ,emerson4 ,with ,portrait of ,emerson4 ,sonnets of this ,century4 ,portrait of ,p4 ,b4 ,marston4 ,whitman4 ,with ,portrait of ,whitman4 ,love ,letters of a ,violinist4 ,portrait of ,eric ,mackay4 ,scott4 ,lady of the ,lake1 etc4 with ,portrait of ,sir ,walter ,scott1 and ,view of 8,the ,silver ,strand1 ,loch ,katrine40 ,scott4 ,marmion1 etc4 with ,portrait of ,sir ,walter ,scott1 and ,view of 8,the ,silver ,strand1 ,loch ,katrine40 ,children of the ,poets4 ,with an ,engraving of 8,the ,orphans10 by ,gainsborough4 ,sonnets of ,europe4 ,with ,portrait of ,j4 ,a4 ,symonds4 ,sydney ,dobell4 ,with ,portrait of ,sydney ,dobell4 ,herrick4 ,with ,portrait of ,herrick4 ,ballads and ,rondeaus4 ,portrait of ,w4 ,e4 ,henley4 ,irish ,minstrelsy4 ,with ,portrait of ,thomas ,davis4 ,paradise ,lost4 ,with ,portrait of ,milton4 ,fairy ,music4 ,engraving from ,drawing by ,c4 ,e4 ,brock4 ,golden ,treasury4 ,with ,engraving of ,virgin ,mother4 ,american ,sonnets4 ,with ,portrait of ,j4 ,r4 ,lowell4 ,imitation of ,christ4 ,with ,engraving1 8,ecce ,homo40 ,painter ,poets4 ,with ,portrait of ,walter ,crane4 ,women ,poets4 ,with ,portrait of ,mrs4 ,browning4 ,poems of ,hon4 ,roden ,noel4 ,portrait of ,hon4 ,r4 ,noel4 ,american ,humorous ,verse4 ,portrait of ,mark ,twain4 ,songs of ,freedom4 ,with ,portrait of ,william ,morris4 ,scottish ,minor ,poets4 ,with ,portrait of ,r4 ,tannahill4 ,contemporary ,scottish ,verse4 ,with ,portrait of ,robert ,louis ,stevenson4 ,paradise ,regained4 ,with ,portrait of ,milton4 ,cavalier ,poets4 ,with ,portrait of ,suckling4 ,humorous ,poems4 ,with ,portrait of ,hood4 ,herbert4 ,with ,portrait of ,herbert4 ,poe4 ,with ,portrait of ,poe4 ,owen ,meredith4 ,with ,portrait of late ,lord ,lytton4 ,love ,lyrics4 ,with ,portrait of ,raleigh4 ,german ,ballads4 ,with ,portrait of ,schiller4 ,campbell4 ,with ,portrait of ,campbell4 ,canadian ,poems4 ,with ,view of ,mount ,stephen4 ,early ,english ,poetry4 ,with ,portrait of ,earl of ,surrey4 ,allan ,ramsay4 ,with ,portrait of ,ramsay4 ,spenser4 ,with ,portrait of ,spenser4 ,chatterton4 ,with ,engraving1 8,the ,death of ,chatterton40 ,cowper4 ,with ,portrait of ,cowper4 ,chaucer4 ,with ,portrait of ,chaucer4 ,coleridge4 ,with ,portrait of ,coleridge4 ,pope4 ,with ,portrait of ,pope4 ,byron4 ,miscellaneous with ,portraits of ,byron4 ,byron4 ,don ,juan with ,portraits of ,byron4 ,jacobite ,songs4 ,with ,portrait of ,prince ,charlie4 ,border ,ballads4 ,with ,view of ,neidpath ,castle4 ,australian ,ballads4 ,with ,portrait of ,a4 ,l4 ,gordon4 ,hogg4 ,with ,portrait of ,hogg4 ,goldsmith4 ,with ,portrait of ,goldsmith4 ,moore4 ,with ,portrait of ,moore4 ,dora ,greenwell4 ,with ,portrait of ,dora ,greenwell4 ,blake4 ,with ,portrait of ,blake4 ,poems of ,nature4 ,with ,portrait of ,andrew ,lang4 ,praed4 ,with ,portrait4 ,southey4 ,with ,portrait4 ,hugo4 ,with ,portrait4 ,goethe4 ,with ,portrait4 ,beranger4 ,with ,portrait4 ,heine4 ,with ,portrait4 ,sea ,music4 ,with ,view of ,corbire ,rocks1 ,jersey4 ,song-tide4 ,with ,portrait of ,philip ,bourke ,marston4 ,lady of ,lyons4 ,with ,portrait of ,bulwer ,lytton4 ,shakespeare3 ,songs and ,sonnets4 ,with ,portrait4 ,ben ,jonson4 ,with ,portrait4 ,horace4 ,with ,portrait4 ,crabbe4 ,with ,portrait4 ,cradle ,songs4 ,with ,engraving from ,drawing by ,t4 ,e4 ,macklin4 ,ballads of ,sport4 ,with ,engraving from ,drawing by ,t4 ,e4 ,macklin4 ,matthew ,arnold4 ,with ,portrait4 ,austin's ,days of the ,year1 ,with ,portrait4 ,clough's ,bothie1 and other ,poems4 ,with ,view4 ,browning's ,pippa ,passes1 etc4 ,with ,portrait4 ,browning's ,blot in the ',scutcheon1 etc4 ,with ,portrait4 ,browning's ,dramatic ,lyrics4 ,with ,portrait4 ,mackay's ,lover's ,missal4 ,with ,portrait4 ,kirke ,white's ,poems4 ,with ,portrait4 ,lyra ,nicotiana4 ,with ,portrait4 ,aurora ,leigh4 ,with ,portrait of ,e4 ,b4 ,browning4 ,naval ,songs4 ,with ,portrait of ,lord ,nelson4 ,tennyson3 ,in ,memoriam1 ,maud1 etc4 ,with ,portrait4 ,tennyson3 ,english ,idyls1 ,the ,princess1 etc4 ,with ,view of ,farringford ,house4 ,war ,songs4 ,with ,portrait of ,lord ,roberts4 ,james ,thomson4 ,with ,portrait4 ,alexander ,smith4 ,with ,portrait4 ,the ,music ,story ,series4 ,a ,,series ,,of ,,literary-,,musical ,,monographs4 ,edited by ,,frederick ,j4 ,,crowest1 ,author of 8,the ,great ,tone ,poets10 etc41 etc4 ,illustrated with ,photogravure and ,collotype ,portraits1 ,half-tone and ,line ,pictures1 ,facsimiles1 etc4 ,square ,crown #hvo1 ,cloth1 #cs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,volumes ,,now ,,ready4 ,the ,story of ,oratorio4 ,by ,annie ,w4 ,patterson1 ,b4,a41 ,mus4 ,doc4 ,the ,story of ,notation4 ,by ,c4 ,f4 ,abdy ,williams1 ,m4,a41 ,mus4 ,bac4 ,the ,story of the ,organ4 ,by ,c4 ,f4 ,abdy ,williams1 ,m4,a41 ,author of 8,bach0 and 8,handel0 78,master ,musicians' ,series074 ,the ,story of ,chamber ,music4 ,by ,n4 ,kilburn ,mus4 ,bac4 7,cantab471 ,conductor of the ,middlesbrough1 ,sunderland1 and ,bishop ,auckland ,musical ,societies4 ,the ,story of the ,violin4 ,by ,paul ,stoeving1 ,professor of the ,violin1 ,guildhall ,school of ,music1 ,london4 ,the ,story of the ,harp4 ,by ,william ,h4 ,grattan ,flood1 ,author of 8,history of ,irish ,music40 ,the ,story of ,organ ,music4 ,by ,c4 ,f4 ,abdy ,williams1 ,m4,a41 ,mus4 ,bac4 ,,in ,,preparation4 ,the ,story of the ,pianoforte4 ,by ,algernon ,s4 ,rose1 ,author of 8,talks with ,bandsmen40 ,the ,story of ,english ,minstrelsy4 ,by ,edmondstoune ,duncan4 ,the ,story of the ,orchestra4 ,by ,stewart ,macpherson1 ,fellow and ,professor1 ,royal ,academy of ,music4 ,the ,story of ,musical ,sound4 ,by ,churchill ,sibley1 ,mus4 ,doc4 ,the ,story of ,church ,music4 ,by ,the ,editor4 ,etc41 ,etc41 ,etc4 99 99 99 99 99 99 ,transcriber's note3 ,original spelling and grammar have been generally retained1 with some exceptions noted below4 ,page xi4 ,the phrase ,weath of ,nations was changed to ,wealth of ,nations4 ,page xiii4 ,the phrase #8,i am much pleased with was changed to 8,i am much pleased with4 ,page xxiii4 ,the phrase int his room while was changed to into his room while4 ,page #add4 ,the phrases ,xerxes's army and ,xerxes' army are both retained4 ,page #aegn4 ,the phrase much rom their business was changed to much from their business4 ,pages #afb-afc4 ,the phrases 8that in the year 7p4 #afb7 and north exposition40 7p4 #afc7 contain unbalanced quotation marks in the original4 ,two new double quotation marks have been inserted to balance these1 at 8#8,hybernum fracta and 8,he speaks of that river's4 ,page #bed4 ,the phrase ,,samillus1 ,,marcus ,,furius was changed to ,,camillus1 ,,marcus ,,furius4 ,page #beh4 ,this 7originally unnumbered7 page begins sixteen pages of advertisements from ,the ,walter ,scott ,publishing ,co4 ,a new heading ,,advertisements was inserted4 ,this new heading contains also the footer text that was originally printed on each page of the ads section4 ,the ads were printed in several different styles with considerable variation4 ,the styling has been herein greatly simplified4 ,several large curly brackets that graphically indicate combination of information on two or more lines of text have been eliminated1 by restructuring the text4 ,ditto marks ,do4 were also removed4