,,the ,,origin ,,of ,,the ,,knowledge ,,of ,,right ,,and ,,wrong ,,the ,,origin ,,of ,,the ,,knowledge ,,of ,,right ,,and ,,wrong ,,by ,,franz ,,brentano ,,english ,,translation ,,by ,,cecil ,,hague ,,formerly ,,lector ,,at ,,prague ,,university ,,with ,a ,,biographical ,,note ,,westminster ,,archibald ,,constable ,,co ,,ltd #b ,,whitehall ,,gardens #aijb ,,butler ,,tanner1 ,,the ,,selwood ,,printing ,,works1 ,,frome1 ,,and ,,london4 ,the present translation owes its origin to a desire on the part of the translator of bringing to the wider notice of his fellow-countrymen a work which has proved beneficial and stimulating to himself4 ,written during short intervals of leisure while studying with ,professor ,anton ,marty of ,prague ,university1 it has had the advantage of his careful and constant supervision4 ,without his aid it would scarcely have seen the light4 ,the translator has especially to thank ,professor ,s4 ,a4 ,alexander1 of ,owens ,college1 ,manchester1 for his valuable help in the general revision and the translation of several difficult passages4 ,it is now1 alas1 too late to do more than record the translator's debt to the late ,professor ,adamson1 of ,glasgow ,university1 whose revision and correction of this essay was one of the last services rendered to the cause of truth by a life-long disciple4 ,west ,dulwich1 #aijb4 ,,author',s ,,preface ,this lecture1 which ,i now bring before the notice of a larger public1 was delivered by me before the ,vienna ,law ,society on ,january #bc1 #ahhi4 ,it then bore the title3 8,of the ,natural ,sanction for ,law and ,morality40 ,this title ,i have changed in order to bring its general purport more clearly into prominence2 otherwise ,i have made scarcely any further alteration4 ,numerous notes have been added1 and an already published essay3 8,miklosich on ,subjectless ,propositions0 appended4 ,in what way it bears upon inquiries apparently so remote will be evident in the sequel4 ,the occasion of the lecture was an invitation extended to me by ,baron ,von ,hye1 ,president of the ,society4 ,it was his wish that what had been said here a few years ago by ,ihering1 as jurist1 in his address1 ber die ,entstehung des ,rechtsgefhls1 might in the same ,society be illustrated by me from the philosophic point of view4 ,it would be a mistake to assume from the incidental nature of the circumstances to which it owed its first appearance that the ,essay was only a fugitive1 occasional study4 ,it embraces the fruits of many years' reflection4 ,the discussions it contains form the ripest product of all that ,i have hitherto published4 ,these thoughts form a fragment of a ,descriptive ,psychology1 which1 as ,i now venture to hope1 ,i may be enabled in the near future to publish in its complete form4 ,in its wide divergence from all that has hitherto been put forward1 and especially by reason of its being an essential stage in the further development of some of the views advocated in my ,psychology from the ,empirical ,standpoint it will be sufficiently evident that during the period of my long literary retirement ,i have not been idle4 ,specialists in philosophy will find also in this lecture what will be at once recognized as new4 ,as regards the general reader1 the rapidity with which ,i pass from one question to another might at first completely conceal many a sunken reef which required to be circumnavigated1 many a precipice which had to be avoided4 ,surely ,i1 if any one1 have reason1 owing to the conciseness of statement employed1 to remember the saying of ,leibnitz and pay little attention to refutation and much to demonstration4 ,a glance at the notes--which1 were they to do full justice to the subject1 would need to be multiplied an hundredfold--will give him a further idea of those bye-paths which have misled so many1 and prevented their finding an issue to the labyrinth4 ,meantime ,i would be well content--nay1 ,i would regard it as the crown to all my efforts--should all that has been said appear so self-evident to him that he does not deem himself bound to thank me once in return4 ,no one has determined the principles of ethics as1 on the basis of new analyses1 ,i have found it necessary to determine them1 no one1 especially among those who hold that in the foundation of those principles the feelings must find a place1 have so radically and completely broken with the subjective view of ethics4 ,i except only ,herbart4 ,but he lost himself in the sphere of aesthetic feeling1 until at last we find him so far from the track that he1 who in the theoretical philosophy is the irreconcilable enemy of contradiction1 nevertheless in practical philosophy 7i4e4 ethics7 tolerates it when his principles--the highest universally valid ideas--rush into conflict with one another4 ,still his teaching remains in a certain aspect truly related with mine1 while1 on other sides1 other celebrated attempts to discover a basis for ethics find in it points of contact4 ,in the notes1 individual points are more sharply defined1 a very detailed examination of which would have been too prolix in the lecture4 ,many an objection already urged has been met1 many an expected rejoinder anticipated4 ,i also hope that some will be interested in the several historical contributions1 especially in the inquiries concerning ,descartes1 where ,i trace back the doctrine of evidence to its causes and point out two further thoughts1 one of which has been misunderstood1 the other scarcely noticed1 neither treated with the consideration they deserve4 ,i refer to his fundamental classification of mental states and to his doctrine of the relation of love to joy1 and of hate to sadness4 ,with several highly honoured investigators of the present--assuredly not least honoured by myself--,i have entered into a polemical debate1 and indeed most vigorously with those whose previous attack has compelled me to a defence4 ,i hope that they do not regard it as a violation of their claims1 when ,i seek1 to the utmost of my power1 to help the truth1 which we in common serve1 to her rights1 and ,i assure them in turn1 that as ,i myself speak frankly1 so also none the less do ,i welcome with all my heart every sincere word of my opponent4 ,,franz ,,brentano4 ,,contents ,,the ,,origin ,,of ,,the ,,knowledge ,,of ,,right ,,and ,,wrong ,a ,,lecture ,,page #a4 ,value of ,history and ,philosophy for ,jurisprudence2 the new proposals for the reform of legal studies in ,austria #a #b4 ,our theme2 ,relation to ,ihering's lecture before the ,vienna ,law ,society #b #c4 ,twofold meaning of the expression 8natural right0 #b #d4 ,points of agreement with ,ihering2 rejection of the 8jus naturae0 and 8jus gentium02 pre-ethical political statutes #c #e4 ,opposition to ,ihering2 ,there exists a universally valid naturally recognizable moral law4 ,relative independence of the question #d #f4 ,the notion 8natural sanction0 #d #g4 ,manifold misconception of the same by philosophers #f #h4 ,habitually developed feeling of compulsion as such is no sanction #f #i4 ,motives of hope and fear as such not yet sanction #f #aj4 ,the thought of the arbitrary command of a higher power is not the natural sanction #g #aa4 ,the ethical sanction is a command similar to the logical rule #h #ab4 ,the aesthetic point of view2 as little in ethics as in logic the right one #i #ac4 ,kant's ,categorical ,imperative an impracticable fiction #aj #ad4 ,necessity for preliminary psychological inquiries #aj #ae4 ,no willing without a final end #aj #af4 ,the problem3 which end is right8 the chief problem of ethics #aa #ag4 ,the right end is the best among attainable ends2 obscureness of this definition #aa #ah4 ,of the origin of the conception of the good2 it has not its origin in the sphere of the so-called external impression #ab #ai4 ,the common characteristic of everything psychical #ab #bj4 ,the three fundamental classes of psychical phenomena2 idea 7,vorstellung71 judgment1 feeling 7,gemtsbewegung7 #ac #ba4 ,the contrasts1 belief and denial1 love and hate #ae #bb4 ,of these opposed modes of relation one is always right1 one wrong #ae #bc4 ,the conception of the good #ae #bd4 ,distinction of the good in the narrow sense from what is good for the sake of some other good #af #be4 ,love is not always a proof that an object is worthy to be loved #af #bf4 8,blind0 and 8self-evident0 judgment #ag #bg4 ,analogous distinction in the sphere of pleasure and displeasure2 criterion of the good #ah #bh4 ,plurality of the good2 problems associated therewith #ba #bi4 ,whether by 8the better0 is to be understood that which deserves to be loved with more intensity #ba #cj4 ,right determination of the conception #bb #ca4 ,when and how do we recognize that anything is in itself preferable8 ,the case of the opposite1 of absence1 of the addition of like to like #bc #cb4 ,cases where the problem is insoluble #be #cc4 ,whether the ,hedonists in this respect would have the advantage #bf #cd4 ,why these failures prove less disadvantageous than might be feared #bg #ce4 ,the sphere of the highest practical good #bh #cf4 ,the harmonious development #bh #cg4 ,the natural sanction respecting the limits of right #bi #ch4 ,the natural sanction for positive ethical laws #bi #ci4 ,the power of the natural sanction #cj #dj4 ,true and false relativity respecting ethical rules #cj #da4 ,derivation of well known special enactments #cb #db4 ,why other philosophers1 by other ways1 arrive at the same goal #cb #dc4 ,whence arise the universally extended ethical truths8 ,unclearness concerning processes in one's own consciousness #cc #dd4 ,trace of the influence of the moments severally mentioned #ce #de4 ,lower currents exercising an influence #cg #df4 ,necessity of guarding against overlooking the distinction between ethical and pseudo-ethical development #ci #dg4 ,value of such developments in the pre-ethical time2 establishment of the social order2 formation of dispositions2 outlines of laws at the disposal of legislative ethical authority2 security against doctrinaire tendencies #ci #dh4 ,beneficent influences which still operate continually from this side #da #di4 ,a further word on the reform of politico-legal studies #db ,,notes4 ,,page #ac4 ,in defence of my characterization of ,herbart's ethical criterion #dd #ad4 ,of ,kant's ,categorical ,imperative #dd #af4 ,the ,nicomachean ,ethics and ,ihering's 8fundamental idea0 in his work2 ,der ,zweck im ,recht #df #ag4 ,of the cases of smaller chances in the effort after higher ends #df #ah4 ,of the dependence of the conceptions upon concrete perceptions #df #ai4 ,the term 8intentional0 #dg #ba4 ,the fundamental classification of mental states in ,descartes #dg #bb4 ,windelband's error in respect of the fundamental classification of mental states2 short defence of various attacks upon my ,psychology from the ,empirical ,standpoint2 ,land1 on a supposed improvement on formal logic2 ,steinthal's criticism of my doctrine of judgment #ej #bc4 ,in criticism of ,sigwart's theories of the existential and negative judgments #ee #bd4 ,descartes on the relation of 8love0 to 8joy0 and of 8hate0 to 8sadness0 #fi #be4 ,of the notions of truth and existence #fi #bf4 ,of the unity of the notion of the good #ga #bg4 ,of 8evidence40 ,descartes 8,clara et distincta perceptio40 ,sigwart's doctrine of 8evidence0 and his 8postulates0 #ga #bh4 ,of ethical subjectivism4 ,aristotle's oversight in respect of the source of our knowledge of the good4 ,parallels between his error in respect of the feelings 7,gemtsthtigkeit71 and ,descartes' doctrine of the 8,clara et distincta perceptio0 as a pre-condition of the logically justified judgment2 modern views which approach to this doctrine #gh #bi4 ,of the expressions 8gut gefallen0 and 8schlecht gefallen0 #hd #ca4 ,typical case of a constant geometrical relation of mental values #he #cb4 ,cases in which something at the same time both pleases and displeases #he #cc4 ,establishment of universal laws of valuation on the basis of a single experience #hf #cd4 ,certain moments in the theory of ethical knowledge are of more importance for the theodicy than for ethics itself #hg #ce4 ,explanation of the manner in which anything in certain cases is recognized as preferable #hg #cf4 ,the two cases1 unique in their kind1 in which preferability becomes clear for us from a certain character in the act of preference #hg #ci4 ,gauss on the measurement of intensities #hi #dj4 ,against exaggerated expectations from the so-called psycho-physical law #hi #dj4 ,defence against the objection of a too great ethical rigour #ij #da4 ,love of neighbour in harmony with greater care of one's own good #ia #dc4 ,why the narrowness of human foresight should not do injury to moral courage #ib #dd4 ,in criticism of ,ihering's view of the notion of right and of his criticism of older views #ic #de4 ,of the provisional ethical sanction of objectionable laws #if #fj4 ,self-contradiction of ,epicurus #ig #fd-fe4 ,proof for the law of addition of like to like2 testimony for it in the teaching of the ,stoa1 of the theistic ,hedonists1 and in the demand for immortality2 ,helmholtz #ih #fg4 ,the great theologians are opponents of the arbitrary character of the divine law of morals #ii #fh4 ,john ,stuart ,mill on the doctrine of the distinction between 8blind0 and 8self-evident judgments0 #ii 7,the numbers missing in the index contain only literary references47 ,,miklosich ,,on ,,subjectless ,,propositions 7,appendix to pages #ad and #ee74 ,i4 ,short sketch of the essential features treated in ,miklosich's article #aje ,,ii4 ,critical remarks #aaj ,biographical ,note #aai ,a ,,lecture #a4 ,the invitation to lecture extended to me by the ,law ,society was the more binding as it gave expression in strong terms to a conviction which1 unfortunately1 seems on the point of falling into abeyance4 ,proposals for a reform of legal studies have been heard 7and they are even said to have proceeded from university circles7 which can only mean that the roots of jurisprudence deeply implanted as they are in the spheres of ethics and national history may be severed1 without the organism itself suffering any vital injury4 ,as regards history1 this counsel is to me1 ,i confess1 utterly inexplicable2 in respect of philosophy1 ,i can excuse it only on the ground that the men who at present occupy the chairs in the legal faculty have taken a deep and gloomy impression of the mistakes of a period which has lately passed away4 ,a personal reproach may therefore well be spared them4 ,yet indeed such suggestions were every bit as wise as would be the case if a medical faculty were to propose to erase from their plan of obligatory studies zoology1 physics and chemistry4 ,if ,leibnitz in his ,vita a se ipso lineata1 speaking of himself1 says3 8,i found that my earlier studies in history and philosophy lightened materially my study of law10 and if1 as in his ,specimen difficultatis in jure1 deploring the prejudices of contemporary jurists1 he exclaims3 8,oh6 that those who busy themselves with the study of law would throw aside their contempt of philosophy and see that without philosophy most of the questions of their jus form a labyrinth without issue60 what indeed would he say were he to rise again to-day1 to these retrograde reform movements8 #b4 ,the worthy ,president of the ,society1 who has retained such a lively and wide sense of the real scientific needs of his profession1 expressed to me his own special wishes respecting the theme to be chosen4 ,the question as to the existence of a natural right was1 he said1 a subject which enjoyed an exceptional interest with the members of the ,law ,society2 and he himself was anxious to learn what attitude ,i would adopt with regard to the views there expressed by ,ihering some years ago4#a ,i consented gladly1 and have therefore designated as the subject of my lecture the natural sanction for law and morality1 wishing thereby1 at the same time1 to indicate in what sense alone ,i believe in a natural right4 #c4 ,for a two-fold meaning may be associated with the term 8natural03-- 7#a7 ,it may mean as much as 8given by nature10 8innate10 in contradistinction to what has been acquired during historical development either by deduction or by experience4 7#b7 ,it may mean1 in contradistinction to what is determined by the arbitrary will of a dictator1 the rules which1 in and for themselves and in virtue of their nature are recognized as right and binding4 ,ihering rejects natural right in either of these meanings4#b ,i1 for my part1 agree as thoroughly with him regarding the one meaning as ,i differ from him regarding the other4 #d4 ,i agree completely with ,ihering when1 following the example of ,john ,locke1 he denies all innate moral principles4 ,further1 like him1 ,i believe neither in the grotesque jus naturae1 i4e4 quod natura ipsa omnia animalia docuit1 nor in a jus gentium1 in a right which1 as the ,roman jurists defined it1 is recognized as a natural law of reason by the universal agreement of all nations4 ,it is not necessary to have gone deeply into zoology and physiology in order to see that we can no longer use the animal world as a criterion for the setting up of ethical standards1 even if one is not disposed to go so far as ,rokitansky in pronouncing protoplasma1 with its aggressive character1 an unrighteous and evil principle4 ,as to a common code of right for all nations1 such a belief was a delusion which might hold good in the antique world2 in modern times when the ethnographical horizon has been extended1 and the customs of barbarous races drawn upon for comparison1 these laws can no longer be recognized as a product of nature1 but only as a product of culture common to the more advanced nations4 ,as regards all this1 therefore1 ,i am in agreement with ,ihering2 ,i am also substantially in agreement with him when he asserts that there have been times without any trace of ethical knowledge and ethical feeling2 at any rate without anything of the kind that was commonly accepted4 ,indeed ,i acknowledge unhesitatingly that this state of things continued even when larger communities under state government had been constituted4 ,when ,ihering1 in support of this view1 points to ,greek mythology with its gods and goddesses destitute of moral thought and feeling1 and maintains that1 by the lives of the gods1 the life of mankind in the period in which these myths took shape may be interpreted1#c he does but use a method of proof which ,aristotle has already employed in a similar manner in his ,politics4#d ,this also must therefore be conceded him1 and we shall1 on this ground1 no longer deny that the earliest political laws supported by penal sanction were established without the help of any feeling of right founded upon moral insight4 ,there are1 therefore1 no natural moral laws and legal precepts in the sense that they are given by nature herself1 that they are innate2 in this respect1 ,ihering's views have our entire approval4 #e4 ,we have now to meet the second and far more important question3 ,do there exist truths concerning morality1 taught by nature herself1 and is there moral truth1 independent of all ecclesiastical1 political1 in fact every kind of social authority8 ,is there a natural moral law which1 in its nature1 is universally and incontestably valid for men of every place and time1 valid indeed for every kind of thinking and sentient being2 and does the knowledge of it lie within the realm of our mental faculties8 ,here we are at the point where ,i join issue with ,ihering4 ,to this question1 which ,ihering answers in the negative1 ,i return a decided affirmative4 ,which of us is here in the right our present inquiry into the natural sanction for law and morality will1 ,i hope1 make clear4 ,at any rate1 the decision as to the former question1 whatever ,ihering#e himself may think to the contrary1 does not in any way prejudge the latter4 ,innate prejudices do exist2 these are natural in the former sense1 but they lack natural sanction2 whether true or false1 they possess no immediate validity4 ,on the other hand1 there are many propositions recognized after a natural manner1 which are incontestably certain and have universal validity for all thinking beings1 which1 however1 as1 for example1 the ,pythagorean theorem are anything but innate1 else the blissful first discoverer had never offered his hecatomb to the god4 #f4 ,in what has been said ,i have made it sufficiently evident how1 when ,i speak of natural sanction1 ,i understand the notion of sanction4 ,yet it will be well to linger a moment in order to exclude another inadequate view4 8,sanction0 signifies 8making fast40 ,now a law may be fixed in a double sense3 7#a7 ,it may be fixed in the sense of becoming law1 as when a proposed law receives validity by ratification on the part of the highest legislative authority4 7#b7 ,in the sense of being rendered more effectual by attaching to it positive punishments1 perhaps also rewards4 ,it is in this latter sense that sanction was spoken of by writers of antiquity1 as when ,cicero#f says of the leges ,porciae3 8,neque quicquam praeter sanctionem attulerunt novi02 and ,ulpian3#g 8,interdum in sanctionibus adijicitur1 ut qui ibi aliquid commisit1 capite puniatur40 ,it is in the former sense that the expression is more usual in modern times2 a law is said to be 8sanctioned0 when it secures validity by receiving confirmation at the hands of the highest authority4 ,manifestly sanction in the second sense presupposes sanction in the first1 which sanction is the more essential1 since1 without it1 the law would not truly be law at all4 ,such a natural sanction therefore is of the last necessity if anything whatever is to bear by nature the stamp of law or morality4 #g4 ,if we now compare with such a view what has been said by philosophers concerning the natural sanction for morality1 it will be easily seen how often they have overlooked its essential character4 #h4 ,many think that they have discovered a natural sanction in respect of a certain line of conduct when they have shown that a certain feeling of compulsion so to act is developed within the individual4 ,since every one1 for example1 renders services to others in order to receive similar services in return1 there at last arises a habit of performing such services even in cases where there has been no thought of recompense4#h ,this it is which is thought to constitute the sanction for love of our neighbour4 ,but this view is entirely erroneous4 ,such a feeling of compulsion is certainly a force driving to action1 but it is assuredly not a sanction conferring validity4 ,besides1 the inclination to vice develops according to the same law of habit1 and exercises1 as an impulse1 the most unbounded sway4 ,the miser's passion which leads him1 in his desire of amassing riches1 to submit to the heaviest sacrifices and to commit the most extreme cruelties1 certainly constitutes no sanction for his conduct4 #i4 ,again1 motives of hope or fear that a certain manner of behaviour1 as1 for example1 regard for the general good1 will render us agreeable or disagreeable to other and more powerful beings1 these it has often been sought to regard as a sanction for such conduct4#i ,but it is manifest that the most cringing cowardice1 the most servile flattery might then boast a natural sanction4 ,as a matter of fact virtue shines out most brightly where neither threats nor entreaties are able to divert her from the right path4 #aj4 ,some speak of an education in which man1 as belonging to an order of living beings accustomed to live in society1 receives from those by whom he is surrounded4 ,an injunction is repeatedly laid upon him1 the command3 8,you ought40 ,it lies in the nature of things that certain actions are very frequently and generally required of him4 ,there is thus formed an association between his mode of action and the thought3 8,you ought40 ,and so it may happen that he may come to regard1 as the source of this command1 the society in which he lives1 or even something vaguely conceived to be higher than an individual1 that is to say1 something regarded in a way as superhuman4 ,the 8ought0 associated by him with such a being would then constitute the sanction of conscience4#aj ,in this case the natural sanction would then consist in the naturally developed belief in the command of a more powerful will4 ,but it is manifest that such a belief in the command of a more powerful being contains1 as yet1 nothing which deserves the name of a sanction4 ,such a conviction is shared by one who knows himself to be at the mercy of a tyrant or of a robber horde4 ,whether he obey1 or bid defiance1 the command itself contains nothing able to give to the required act a sanction similar to that of the conscience4 ,even if he obey he does so through fear1 not because he regards the command as one based on right4 ,the thought1 therefore1 that an act is commanded by some one does not constitute a natural sanction4 ,in the case of every command issued by an external will the question arises3 ,is such a command authorized or is it not8 ,neither is there any reference here to a command enforced by a still higher power enjoining obedience to the former4 ,for then the question would again reappear1 and we should proceed from one command to another enjoining obedience to the former1 and from that to a third enjoining in like manner obedience to the second1 and so on ad infin4 ,just as in the case of the feeling of compulsion1 and in that of the fear or hope of recompense1 so also the thought of the command of an external will cannot possibly be the sanction for law and morality4 #aa4 ,but there are also commands in an essentially different sense2 commands in the sense in which we speak of the commands of logic respecting our judgments and conclusions4 ,we are not here concerned with the will of logic1 since a will logic manifestly has not1 nor with the will of the logician1 to which we have in no way sworn allegiance4 ,the laws of logic are naturally valid rules of judging1 that is to say1 we are obliged to conform to them1 since conformity to these rules ensures certainty in our judgments1 whereas judgments diverging from these rules are liable to error4 ,what we therefore mean is a natural superiority which thought-processes in conformity with law have over such as are contrary to law4 ,so also in ethics1 we are not concerned with the command of an external will but rather with a natural preference similar to that in logic1 and the law founded on that preference4 ,this has been emphasized not only by ,kant but also by the majority of great thinkers before him4 ,nevertheless there are still many--unfortunately even among the adherents of the empirical school to which ,i myself belong--by whom this fact has neither been rightly understood nor appreciated4 #ab4 ,in what then lies this special superiority which gives to morality its natural sanction8 ,some regarded it as1 in a sense1 external1 they believed its superiority to consist in beauty of appearance4 ,the ,greeks called noble and virtuous conduct 1 the beautiful1 and the perfect man of honour 2 though none of the philosophers of antiquity set up this aesthetic view as a criterion4 ,on the other hand1 ,david ,hume#aa1 among modern thinkers1 has spoken of a moral sense of the beautiful which acts as arbiter between the moral and the immoral1 while still more recently the ,german philosopher1 ,herbart1#ab has subordinated ethics to aesthetics4 ,now ,i do not deny that the aspect of virtue is more agreeable than that of moral perversity4 ,but ,i cannot concede that in this consists the only and essential superiority of ethical conduct4 ,it is rather an inner superiority which distinguishes the moral from the immoral will1 in the same way that it is an inner superiority which distinguishes true and self evident judgments and conclusions from prejudices and fallacies4 ,here also it cannot be denied that a prejudice1 a fallacy has in it something unbeautiful1 often indeed something ridiculously narrow-minded1 which makes the person so scantily favoured by ,minerva appear in a most disadvantageous attitude2 yet who1 on this account1 would class the rules of logic among those of aesthetics1 or make logic a branch of aesthetics8#ac ,no1 the real logical superiority is no mere aesthetic appearance but a certain inward rightness which then carries with it a certain superiority of appearance4 ,it will1 therefore1 be also a certain inward rightness which constitutes the essential superiority of one particular act of will over another of an opposite character2 in which consists the superiority of the moral over the immoral4 ,the belief in this superiority is an ethical motive2 the knowledge of it is the right ethical motive1 the sanction which gives to ethical law permanence and validity4 #ac4 ,but are we capable of attaining to such knowledge8 ,here lies the difficulty which philosophers have for a long time sought in vain to solve4 ,even to ,kant it seemed as though none had found the right end of the thread by means of which to unravel the skein4 ,this the ,categorical ,imperative was to do4 ,it resembled however1 rather the sword drawn by ,alexander to cut the ,gordian knot4 ,with such a palpable fiction the matter is not to be set right4#ad #ad4 ,in order to gain an insight into the true origin of ethical knowledge it will be necessary to take some account of the results of later researches in the sphere of descriptive psychology4 ,the limited time at my disposal makes it necessary for me to set forth my views very briefly1 and ,i have reason to fear that by its conciseness the completeness of the statement may suffer4 ,yet it is just here that ,i ask your special attention1 in order that what is most essential to a right understanding of the problem be not overlooked4 #ae4 ,the subject of the moral and immoral is termed the will4 ,what we will is1 in many cases1 a means to an end4 ,in that case we will this end also1 and even in a higher degree than the means4 ,the end itself may often be the means to a further end2 in a far reaching plan there may often appear a whole series of ends1 the one being always connected in subordination to the other as a means4 ,there must be present1 however1 one end1 which is desired above all others and for its own sake2 without this essential and final end all incentive would be lacking1 and this would involve the absurdity of aiming without a goal at which to aim4 #af4 ,the means we employ in order to gain an end may be manifold1 may be right or wrong4 ,they are right when they are really adapted to the attainment of the end4 ,the ends1 also1 even the most essential and final ends1 may be manifold4 ,it is a mistake which appeared especially in the eighteenth century1 nowadays the tendency is more and more to abandon it1 that every one seeks the same end1 namely1 his own highest possible pleasure4#ae ,whoever can believe that the martyr facing with full consciousness the most terrible tortures for the sake of his conviction--and there were some who had no hope of recompense hereafter--was thus inspired by a desire after the greatest possible pleasure1 such a man must have either a very defective sense of the facts of the case1 or1 indeed1 have lost all measure of the intensities of pleasure and pain4 ,this1 therefore1 is certain3 even final ends are manifold1 between them hovers the choice1 which1 since the final end is for everything the determining principle1 is of the most importance4 ,what ought ,i to strive after8 ,which end is the right one1 which wrong8 ,this1 as ,aristotle long ago declared1 is the essential1 the cardinal question in ethics4#af #ag4 ,which end is right1 for which should our choice declare itself8 ,where the end is fixed and it is merely a question as to the choice of means1 we reply3 ,choose means which will certainly attain the end4 ,where it is a question as to the choice of ends we would say3 ,choose an end which reason regards as really attainable4 ,this answer is1 however1 insufficient1 many a thing attainable is rather to be shunned than sought after2 choose the best among attainable ends1 this alone is the adequate answer4#ag ,but the answer is obscure2 what do we mean by 8the best08 what can be called 8good0 at all8 and how can we attain to the knowledge that one thing is good and better than another8 #ah4 ,in order to answer this question satisfactorily1 we must1 above all1 inquire into the origin of the conception of the good1 which lies1 like the origin of all our conceptions1 in certain concrete impressions4#ah ,we possess impressions with physical content4 ,these exhibit to us sensuous qualities localized in space4 ,out of this sphere arise the conceptions of colour1 sound1 space and many others4 ,the conception of the good1 however1 has not here its origin4 ,it is easily recognizable that the conception of the good like that of the true1 which1 as having affinity1 is rightly placed side by side with it1 derives its origin from concrete impressions with psychical content4 #ai4 ,the common feature of everything psychical consists in what has been called by a very unfortunate and ambiguous term1 consciousness2 i4e4 in a subject-attitude2 in what has been termed an intentional relation to something which1 though perhaps not real1 is none the less an inner object of perception#ai ,no hearing without the heard1 no believing without the believed1 no hoping without the hoped for1 no striving without the striven for1 no joy without the enjoyed1 and so with other mental phenomena4 #bj4 ,the sensuous qualities which are given in our impressions with physical content exhibit manifold differences4 ,so also do the intentional relations given in our impressions with psychical content4 ,and1 as in the former case1 the number of the senses is determined by reference to those distinctions between sensuous qualities which are most fundamental 7called by ,helmholtz distinctions of modality71 so in the latter case the number of fundamental classes of mental phenomena is fixed by reference to the most fundamental distinctions of intentional relation4#bj ,in this way we distinguish three fundamental classes4 ,descartes in his ,meditations#ba was the first to exhibit these rightly and completely2 but sufficient attention has not been paid to his observations1 and they were soon quite forgotten1 until in recent times1 and independently of him1 these were again discovered4 ,nowadays they may lay claim to sufficient verification4#bb ,the first fundamental class is that of ideas 7,vorstellungen7 in the widest sense of the term 7,descartes' ideae74 ,this class embraces concrete impressions1 those for example which are given to us through the senses1 as well as every abstract conception4 ,the second fundamental class is judgment 7,descartes' judicia74 ,previous to ,descartes these were thought of as forming1 along with ideas1 one fundamental class1 and since ,descartes' time philosophy has fallen once more into this error4 ,this view regarded judgment as consisting essentially in a combination or relation of ideas to one another4 ,this was a gross misconception of its true nature4 ,we may combine or relate ideas as we please1 as in speaking of a golden mountain1 the father of a hundred children1 a friend of science2 but as long as nothing further takes place there can be no judgment4 ,equally true is it that an idea always forms the basis of a judgment1 as also of a desire2 but it is not true that1 in a judgment1 there are always several ideas related to one another as subject and predicate4 ,this is certainly the case when ,i say3 8,god is just10 though not when ,i say3 8,there is a ,god40 ,what1 therefore1 distinguishes those cases where ,i have not only an idea but also a judgment8 ,there is here added to the act of presentation a second intentional relation to the object given in presentation1 a relation either of recognition or rejection4 ,whoever says3 8,god10 gives expression to the idea of ,god2 whoever says3 8,there is a ,god10 gives expression to a belief in him4 ,i must not linger here1 and can only assure you that this1 if anything1 admits to-day of no denial4 ,from the philological standpoint ,miklosich confirms the results of psychological analysis4#bc ,the third fundamental class consists of the emotions in the widest sense of the term1 from the simple forms of inclination or disinclination in respect of the mere idea1 to joy and sadness arising from conviction and to the most complicated phenomena as to the choice of ends and means4 ,aristotle long since included these under the term 4 ,descartes says this class embraces the voluntates sive affectus4 ,as in the second fundamental class the intentional relation was one of recognition or rejection1 so in the third class it is one of love or hate1 7or1 as it might be equally well expressed17 a form of pleasing or displeasing4 ,loving1 pleasing1 hating1 displeasing1 these are given in the simplest forms of inclination or disinclination1 in victorious joy as well as in despairing sorrow1 in hope and fear1 and in every form of voluntary activity4 8,plait-il80 asks the ,frenchman2 8es hat ,gott gefallen10 one reads in 7,german7 announcements of a death2 while the 8,placet10 written when confirming an act1 is the expression of the determining fiat of will4#bd #ba4 ,in comparing these three classes of phenomena it is found that the two last mentioned show an analogy which1 in the first1 is absent4 ,there exists1 that is1 an opposition of intentional relation2 in the case of judgment1 recognition or rejection1 in the case of the emotions1 love or hate1 pleasure or displeasure4 ,the idea shows nothing of a similar nature4 ,i can1 it is true1 conceive of opposites1 as for example white and black1 but whether ,i believe in this black or deny it1 ,i can only represent it to myself in one way2 the representation does not alter with the opposite act of judgment2 nor again1 in the case of the feelings1 when ,i change my attitude towards it according as it pleases or displeases me4 #bb4 ,from this fact follows an important conclusion4 ,concerning acts of the first class none can be called either right or wrong4 ,in the case of the second class on the other hand1 one of the two opposed modes of relation1 affirmation and rejection1 is right the other wrong1 as logic has long affirmed4 ,the same naturally holds good of the third class4 ,of the two opposed modes of relation1 love and hate1 pleasure and displeasure1 in each case one is right the other wrong4 #bc4 ,we have now reached the place where the notions of good and bad1 along with the notions of the true and the false which we have been seeking1 have their source4 ,we call anything true when the recognition related to it is right4#be ,we call something good when the love relating to it is right4 ,that which can be loved with a right love1 that which is worthy of love1 is good in the widest sense of the term4 #bd4 ,since everything which pleases does so1 either for its own sake1 or for the sake of something else which is thereby produced1 conserved or rendered probable1 we must distinguish between a primary and a secondary good1 i4e4 what is good in itself1 and what is good on account of something else1 as is specially the case in the sphere of the useful4 ,what is good in itself is the good in the narrower sense4 ,it alone can stand side by side with the true4 ,for everything which is true is true in itself1 even when only mediately known4 ,when we speak of good later we shall therefore mean1 whenever the contrary is not expressly asserted1 that which is good in itself4 ,in this way we have1 ,i hope1 made clear the notion of good4#bf #be4 ,there follows now the still more important question3 ,how are we to know that anything is good8 ,ought we to say that whatever is loved and is capable of being loved is worthy of love and is good8 ,this is manifestly untrue1 and it is almost inconceivable that some have fallen into this error4 ,one loves what another hates1 and1 in accordance with a well known psychological law already previously referred to it often happens that what at first was desired merely as a means to something else1 comes at last from habit to be desired for its own sake4 ,in such a way the miser is irrationally led to heap up riches and even to sacrifice himself for their sake4 ,the actual presence of love1 therefore1 by no means testifies unconditionally to the worthiness of the object to be loved1 just as affirmation is no unconditional proof of what is true4 ,it might even be said that the first statement is even more evident than the second1 since it can hardly happen that he who affirms anything at the same time holds it to be false1 whereas it frequently happens that a person1 even while loving something1 confesses himself that it is unworthy of his love3 8,video meliora proboque1 ,deteriora sequor40 ,how then are we to know that anything is good8 #bf4 ,the matter appears enigmatical1 but the enigma finds a very easy solution4 ,as a preliminary step to answering the question1 let us turn our glance from the good to the true4 ,not everything which we affirm is on this account true4 ,our judgments are frequently quite blind4 ,many a prejudice which we drank in1 as it were1 with our mother's milk presents to us the appearance of an irrefutable principle4 ,to other equally blind judgments all men have1 by nature1 a kind of instinctive impulsion1 as1 for example1 in trusting blindly to the so-called external impression1 or to a recent remembrance4 ,what is so recognized may often be true1 but it may equally well be false since the affirming judgment contains nothing which gives to it the character of rightness4 ,such1 however1 is the case in certain other judgments1 which in contradistinction to these blind judgments may be termed 8obvious10 8self-evident0 judgments2 as1 for example1 the ,principle of ,contradiction1 and every so-called inner perception which informs me that ,i am now experiencing sensations of sound or colour1 or think and will this or that4 ,in what1 then1 does the distinction between these lower and higher forms of judgment essentially consist8 ,is it a distinction in the degree of belief1 or is it something else8 ,it is not a distinction in the degree of belief2 the instinctive blind assumptions arising from habit are often not in the slightest degree weakened by doubts1 and we are unable to get rid of some even when we have already seen their logical falsity4 ,but such assumptions are the results of blind impulse1 they have nothing of the clearness peculiar to the higher forms of judgment4 ,were the question to be raised3 8,what is then your reason for believing that80 no rational answer would be forthcoming4 ,it is quite true that if the same inquiry were to be made respecting the immediately evident judgment here also no reason could be given1 but in face of the clearness of the judgment the inquiry would appear utterly beside the point1 in fact ridiculous4 ,every one experiences for himself the difference between these two classes of judgment1 and in the reference to this experience1 consists1 as in the case of every conception1 the final explanation4 #bg4 ,all this is1 in its essentials1 universally known1#bg and is contested only by a few1 and then not without great inconsistency4 ,far fewer have noticed an analogous distinction between the higher and lower forms of the feelings of pleasure and displeasure4 ,our pleasure or displeasure is often quite like blind judgment1 only an instinctive or habitual impulse4 ,this is so in the case of the miser's pleasure in piling up1 in those powerful feelings of pleasure and pain connected in men and animals alike with the appearance of certain sensuous qualities1 moreover1 as is especially noticeable in tastes1 different species and even different individuals1 are affected in a quite contrary manner4 ,many philosophers1 and among them very considerable thinkers1 have regarded only that mode of pleasure which is peculiar to the lower phenomena of the class1 and have entirely overlooked the fact that there exists a pleasure and a displeasure of a higher kind4 ,david ,hume1 for example1 betrays almost in every word that he has absolutely no idea of the existence of this higher class4#bh ,how general this oversight has been may be judged from the fact that language has no common name for it4#bi ,yet the fact is undeniable and we propose now to elucidate it by a few examples4 ,we have already said that we are endowed by nature with a pleasure for some tastes and an antipathy for others1 both of which are purely instinctive4 ,we also naturally take pleasure in clear insight1 displeasure in error or ignorance4 8,all men10 says ,aristotle in the beautiful introductory words of his ,metaphysics1#cj 8naturally desire knowledge40 ,this desire is an example which will serve our purpose4 ,it is a pleasure of that higher form which is analogous to self-evidence in the sphere of judgment4 ,in our species it is universal4 ,were there another species which1 while having different preferences from us in respect of sensible qualities1 were opposed to us in loving error for its own sake and hating insight1 then assuredly we should not in the latter as in the former case say3 that it was a matter of taste1 8de gustibus non est disputandum02 rather we should here answer decisively that such love and hatred were fundamentally absurd1 that such a species hated what was undeniably good1 and loved what was undeniably bad in itself4 ,now why1 where the feeling of compulsion is equally strong1 do we answer differently in the one case than in the other8 ,the answer is simple4 ,in the former case the feeling of compulsion was an instinctive impulse2 in the latter the natural feeling of pleasure is a higher love1 having the character of rightness4#ca ,we therefore notice when we ourselves have such a feeling1 that its object is not merely loved and lovable1 its opposite hated and unlovable1 but also that the one is worthy of love1 the other worthy of hatred1 and therefore that one is good1 the other bad4 ,another example4 ,as we prefer insight to error1 so also1 generally speaking1 we prefer joy 7unless indeed it be joy in what is bad7 to sadness4 ,were there beings among whom the reverse held good1 we should regard such conduct as perverse1 and rightly so4 ,here too it is because our love and our hatred are qualified as right4 ,a third example is found in feeling itself so far as it is right and has the character of rightness4 ,as was the case with the rightness and evidence of the judgment1 so also the rightness and higher character of the feelings are also reckoned as good1 while love of the bad is itself bad4#cb ,in order that1 in the sphere of ideas1 we may not leave the corresponding experiences unmentioned3 here in the same way every idea is found to be something good in itself1 and that with every enlargement in the realm of our ideas1 quite apart from what of good or bad may result therefrom1 the good within us is increased4#cc ,here then1 and from such experiences of love qualified as right1 arises within us the knowledge that anything is truly and unmistakably good in the full extent to which we are capable of such knowledge4#cd ,this last clause is added advisedly2 for we must not1 of course1 conceal from ourselves the fact that we have no guarantee that everything which is good will arouse within us a love with the character of rightness4 ,wherever this is not the case our criterion fails1 and the good then1 so far as our knowledge and practical account of it are concerned1 is as much as non-existent4#ce #bh4 ,it is1 however1 not one but many things which we thus recognize as good4 ,and so the questions remain3 ,in that which is good1 and especially in what1 as good1 is attainable1 which is the better8 and further1 which is the highest practical good8 so that it may become the standard for our actions4 #bi4 ,we must first inquire3 ,when is anything better than anything else and recognized by us as better8 and what is meant by 8the better0 at all8 ,the answer now lies ready to hand though not in such a way as to render it unnecessary to exclude a very possible error4 ,if by 8good0 is meant that which is worthy of being loved for its own sake1 then by 8better0 appears to be meant that which is worthy of being loved with a greater love4 ,but is this really so8 ,what is meant by 8with greater love08 ,is it spatial magnitude8 ,hardly2 no one would propose to measure pleasure or displeasure in feet and inches4 8,the intensity of the pleasure10 some will perhaps say1 8is what is meant in speaking of love as great40 ,according to this 8better0 would mean that which pleases with a more intense pleasure4 ,but such a definition closely examined would involve the greatest absurdities4 ,according to this view1 each single case in which joy is felt in anything would seem only to admit of a certain measure of joy1 whereas one would naturally think that it could not possibly be reprehensible to rejoice in what is really good to the fullest extent possible4 ,or1 as we say1 8with all one's heart40 ,descartes has already observed that the act of loving 7when directed towards what is good at all7 can never be too intense4#cf ,and he is manifestly right4 ,were it otherwise what cautiousness should we not be called upon to exercise considering the limits of our mental strength6 ,every time one wished to rejoice over something good1 an anxious survey would be necessary respecting other existing goods in order that the measure of proportion to our total strength might in no way be exceeded4 ,and if one believes in a ,god1 understanding thereby the ,infinite ,good1 the ,ideal of all ideals1 then1 since a man1 even with his whole soul and strength can only love ,god with an act of love of finite intensity he will therefore be compelled to love every other good with an infinitely small degree of intensity1 and1 since this is impossible1 must cease as a matter of fact to love it at all4 ,all this is manifestly absurd4 #cj4 ,and yet it must be said that the better is that which is rightly loved with a greater love1 which is rightly more pleasing1 though in quite another sense4 ,the 8more0 refers not to the relation of intensity between the two acts1 but rather to a peculiar species of phenomena belonging to the general class of pleasure and displeasure1 i4e41 to the phenomena of choice4 ,thereby are meant relating acts which in their peculiar nature are known to every one in experience4 ,in the province of ideas there is nothing analogous4 ,in the province of judgment there are1 it is true1 alongside the simple1 subjectless propositions1 predicative judgments which are acts of a relative character1 but this resemblance is very imperfect4 ,the case here which has most similarity is that of a decision respecting a dialectically propounded question3 8,is this true or false80 in which a sort of preference is given to one above the other4 ,but even here it is always something true which is1 so to speak1 preferred to something false1 never something more true over something less true4 ,whatever is true is true in a like degree1 but whatever is good is not good in equal degree1 and by 8better0 nothing else is meant than what1 when compared with another good1 is preferable1 i4e4 something which for its own sake1 is preferred with a right preference4 ,for the rest a somewhat wider usage of language allows us also to speak of a good as 8better0 over against a bad or purely indifferent1 or even to call something bad over against something still worse 8the better40 ,we then say not of course that it is good1 but still better than the other4 ,this shortly in explanation of the notion of the better4 #ca4 ,next the question3 ,how do we know that anything is really the better8 ,assuming the existence of simple knowledge of things as good and bad1 we appear1 so analogy suggests1 to derive this insight from certain acts of preferring which have the character of rightness4 ,for1 like the simple exercise of pleasure1 so also the act of preferring is sometimes of a lower or impulsive1 and sometimes of a higher kind1 and like the evident judgment1 is qualified as right4 ,the cases in point are1 however1 of such a nature that many might say1 and perhaps with a better right1 that it is analytical judgments which furnish us here with the means of progress1 and that instead of our learning the preferability from the actual preferences1 the preferences have the qualification of rightness because they already presume the recognition of the standard of preferability4#cg ,chiefly belonging to this class are obviously 7#a7 the case where we prefer something good1 and recognized as good1 to something bad1 and recognized as bad4 ,also 7#b7 the case where we prefer the existence of something recognized as good to its non-existence1 or the non-existence of something recognized as bad to its existence4 ,this case embraces in itself a series of important cases1 as the case where we prefer a good to the same good with an admixture of the bad2 and1 on the other hand1 where we prefer something bad1 with an admixture of good1 to the same bad purely for its own sake4 ,further1 the cases in which we prefer the whole of a good to its part1 and again1 the part of something bad to its whole4 ,aristotle has already called attention to the fact that in the case of the good the sum is always better than the separate parts which together make up its sum4 ,such a case of summation presents itself wherever a state has a certain permanence4 ,the same amount of joy which endures an hour is better than if it only lasted for a moment4 ,whoever denies this1 like ,epicurus when he would console us on account of the mortality of the soul1 may easily be led into still more striking absurdities4 ,for then an hour's torture would be no worse than that of a moment4 ,and1 by combining both these propositions1 we should have to assume that an entire life full of joy with a single moment of pain is in no way preferable to an entire life full of pain with a single moment of joy4 ,this is a result at which not only every sound mind in general would demur1 but also one respecting which ,epicurus in particular1 expressly asserts the contrary4 ,closely related to this is the case 7#c7 where one good is preferred to another1 which1 while forming no part of the first1 is yet similar in every respect to one of its parts4 ,it is not merely by adding a good to the same good but also by adding it to a good which is in every respect similar that we get a better for total4 ,the case is analogous when to a similar bad another bad is thought of as added4 ,when therefore1 for example1 a fine picture is seen1 the first time as a whole1 the second time only partially though exactly in the same way1 we must then say that the first view1 considered in itself1 is better3 ,or1 when one imagines something that is good and a second time not only imagines it even as perfectly as before1 but also loves it1 this latter sum of psychical acts is then something better4 ,cases of difference in degree belong also to this third class1 and are especially worthy of mention4 ,if one good1 e4g4 one joy is in every respect quite equal to another1 only more intense1 then the preference which is given to the more intense is qualified as right1 the more intense is the better4 ,conversely1 the bad which is more intense1 e4g4 a more intense pain1 is worse4 ,that is to say3 the degree of intensity corresponds with the distance from the zero point1 and the distance of the greater degree of intensity from zero is compounded of its distance from the weaker degree of intensity plus the distance of this from zero4 ,we have1 therefore1 really to do with a kind of addition1 a view which has been disputed4 #cb4 ,many a one will1 perhaps1 think to himself that the three cases which ,i have set forth are so self-evident and insignificant that it is a matter for surprise that ,i have lingered over them at all4 ,self-evident they are of course1 and this must be so1 since we have here to do with what has to serve as a fundamentum4 ,the case would be worse if they were insignificant2 for1 ,i confess it frankly1 ,i have scarcely another further case to add3 in all1 or1 at any rate1 most of the cases not here included a criterion fails us completely4#ch ,an example4 ,all insight is1 we have said1 something good in itself1 and all noble love is likewise something good in itself4 ,we recognize both these things clearly4 ,but who shall say whether this act of insight or that act of love is in itself1 the better8 ,there have1 of course1 not been wanting those who have given a verdict on this point2 some have even asserted that it is certain every act of noble love for its own sake is a good so high that1 taken by itself1 it is better than all scientific insight taken together4 ,in my judgment this view is not only doubtful but altogether absurd4 ,for a single act of noble love worthy as it is1 is yet a certain finite good4 ,but every act of insight is also a finite good and if ,i keep adding this finite quantity to itself ad libitum1 its sum is bound some time to exceed every given finite measure of good4 ,on the other hand1 ,plato and ,aristotle were inclined to regard the act of knowing considered in itself as higher than ethically virtuous acts1 this also quite unjustly1 and ,i only mention it since the opposition of opinions here is a confirmatory proof of the absence of any criterion4 ,as often happens in the sphere of the psychical1#ci so also here1 real measurements are impossible4 ,now where the inner preference is not to be detected there holds good here what was said in a similar case of simple goodness--as far as our knowledge and practical concern go it is as good as non-existent4 #cc4 ,there are some who1 in opposition to the clear teaching of experience1 assert that only pleasure is good for its own sake1 and pleasure is the good4 ,assuming this view to be right1 would it have the advantage1 as many have believed1 and as ,bentham in particular maintained in its favour1#dj that we should at once attain to a determination of the relative value of goods1 seeing that now we should have only homogeneous goods and these admit of being measured side by side8 ,every more intense pleasure would then be a greater good than one less intense1 and a good having double the intensity would be equal to two of half the intensity4 ,in this way everything would become clear4 ,a moment's reflection only is needed to shatter an illusion born of such hope4 ,are we really able to find out that one pleasure is twice as great as another8 ,gauss#da himself1 who knew something about measurements1 has denied this4 ,a more intense pleasure is never really made up of twelve less intense pleasures distinguishable as equal parts within it1 as a foot is made up of twelve inches4 ,so the matter presents itself even in simpler cases4 ,but how foolish would any one appear were he to assert that the pleasure he had in smoking a good cigar increased #abg1 or1 let us say1 #ajgg times in intensity yielded a measure of the pleasure experienced by him in listening to a symphony of ,beethoven or contemplating one of ,raphael's madonnas6#db ,i think ,i have said enough1 and do not need to allude to the further difficulty involved in comparing the intensity of pleasure with that of pain4 #cd4 ,only therefore to this very limited extent are we able to derive from experience a knowledge of what is better in itself4 ,i can well understand how any one1 reflecting upon this for the first time1 will be led to fear that the great gaps which remain must1 in practice1 prove in the highest degree embarrassing4 ,yet as we proceed and make a vigorous use of what we do possess1 we shall find that the most sensible deficiencies may fortunately turn out harmless in practice4 #ce4 ,for1 from the cases we adduced of preference qualified as right1 the important proposition follows that the province of the highest practical good embraces everything which is subject to our rational operation in so far as a good can be realized in such matter4 ,not merely the self but also the family1 the town1 the state1 the whole present world of life1 even distant future times1 may here be taken into account4 ,all this follows from the principle of the summation of the good4 ,to promote as far as possible the good throughout this great whole1 that is manifestly the right end in life1 towards which every act is to be ordered2 that is the one1 the highest command upon which all the rest depend4#dc ,self-devotion and1 on occasion1 self-sacrifice are1 therefore1 duties2 an equal good wherever it be1 and therefore in the person of another also1 is1 in proportion to its value1 and1 therefore1 everywhere equally to be loved1 and jealousy and malignant envy are excluded4 #cf4 ,and now1 since all lesser goods are to be made subservient to the good of this widest sphere1 light may also be shed from utilitarian considerations upon those dark regions where before we found a standard of choice wanting4 ,if1 for example1 it was true that acts of insight and acts of noble love are not to be measured as to their inner worth in terms of one another1 it is now clear that at any rate neither of these two sides may be entirely neglected at the expense of the other4 ,if one person had perfect knowledge without noble love1 and another perfect noble love without knowledge1 neither would be able to use his gifts in the service of the still greater collective good4 ,a certain harmonious development and exercise of all our noblest powers seems1 therefore1 from this point of view to be1 at any rate1 what we must strive after4#dd #cg4 ,and now after seeing how many duties of love towards the highest practical good come to light1 we proceed to the origin of duties of law4 ,that association which renders possible a division of labour is the indispensable condition of the advancement of the highest good as we have learnt to understand it4 ,man therefore is morally destined to live in society1 and it is easily demonstrable that limits must exist in order that one member of society may not be more of a hindrance than a help to another1#de and that these limits 7though much in this respect is settled by considerations of natural common-sense7 require to be more exactly marked by positive laws1 and need the further security and support of public authority4 ,and while in this way our natural insight demands and sanctions positive law in general1 it may1 in particular1 raise demands on the fulfillment of which depends the measure of the blessing which the state of law is to bring with it4 ,in this way does truth1 bearing the supreme crown1 give1 or refuse1 to the products of positive legislation its sanction1 and it is from this crown that they derive their true binding force4#df ,for as the old sage of ,ephesus says in one of his pregnant ,sibyl-like utterances3 8,all human laws are fed from the one divine law40#dg #ch4 ,besides the laws referring to the limits of right1 in every society there are other positive enactments as to the way in which an individual is to act inside his own sphere of right1 how he is to make use of his liberty and his property4 ,public opinion approves industry1 generosity1 and economy each in its place1 while disapproving idleness1 greed1 prodigality and much else4 ,in the statutes no such laws are to be found1 but they stand written within the hearts of the people4 ,nor are reward and punishment lacking as regards this kind of positive law4 ,these consist in the advantages and disadvantages of good and bad reputation4 ,there exists here1 as it were1 a positive code of morality1 the complement of the positive code of law4 ,this positive code of morality also may contain both right and wrong enactments4 ,to be truly binding they need to be in accord with the rules which1 as we have already seen1 are capable of recognition by the reason1 as a duty of love towards the highest practical good4 ,and so we have really found the natural sanction of morality which we sought4 #ci4 ,i do not linger here to show how this sanction operates4 ,every one would rather say to himself3 8,i am acting rightly10 than 8,i am acting foolishly40 ,and to no one capable of recognizing what is better is this fact entirely indifferent in choosing4 ,in the case of some it is nearly so1 whereas for others it is of the very first importance4 ,innate dispositions are themselves diverse and much advance may be made by education and one's own ethical conduct4 ,enough1 truth speaks1 and whoever is of the truth hears her voice4 #dj4 ,throughout the multiplicity of derived laws graven by nature herself upon the tables of the law1 utilitarian considerations1 as we have seen1 form the standard4 ,as now1 in different situations1 we resort to different means1 so also with regard to these different situations different special precepts must hold good4 ,they may be quite conflicting in their tenour without of course being really contradictory1 since they are intended for different circumstances4 ,in this sense1 then1 a relativity in ethics is rightly asserted4 ,ihering has drawn attention to this1#dh but he is not as he seems to think1 one of the first4 ,on the contrary the doctrine was known of old and is insisted upon by ,plato in his ,republic4#di ,aristotle in his ,ethics1 and with special emphasis in his ,politics has affirmed it4#ej ,the scholastic philosophers also held fast to the doctrine1 and in modern times men even of such energetic ethical and political convictions as ,bentham#ea have not denied it4 ,if the fanatics of the ,french ,revolution failed to recognize it1 still the clear-headed among their fellow-citizens1 even in that time1 did not fall into such a delusion4 ,laplace1 for example1 in his ,essai philosophique sur les probabilits occasionally bears witness to the true teaching and raises his voice in warning4#eb ,thus it happens that the distinguished investigator who has disclosed to us the spirit of ,roman law and to whom1 as the author of ,der ,zweck im ,recht1 we also are bound in many respects to tender our thanks1 has yet here1 as we see1 done nothing else than render the doctrine unclear by confounding it with an essentially different and false doctrine of relativity4 ,according to this doctrine1 no proposition in ethics1 not even the proposition that the best in the widest sphere ought to be the determining standard of action1 would have unexceptional validity4 ,in primitive times and even later1 throughout long centuries1 such a procedure would1 he expressly says1 have been as immoral as1 in later times1 the opposite conduct4 ,we must1 he thinks1 on looking back into the times of cannibalism sympathize rather with the cannibals1 and not with those who perhaps1 in advance of their time1 preached even then the universal love of neighbour4#ec ,these are errors which have been crushingly refuted not merely by philosophical reflection upon the fundamental principles of ethics1 but also by the successes of ,christian missionaries4 #da4 ,thus the road leading to the goal which we set before us has been traversed4 ,for a time it led us through strange and rarely trodden districts1 finally1 however1 the results at which we have arrived smile upon us like old acquaintances4 ,in declaring love of neighbour and self-sacrifice1 both for our country and for mankind to be duties1 we are only echoing what is proclaimed all around us4 ,we should also find by going further into particulars that lying1 treachery1 murder1 debauchery and much besides that is held to be morally base are1 measured by the standard of the principles we have set up1 condemned1 one as unjust1 another as immoral4 ,all this would seem1 in a measure1 familiar to us as the shores of his native land to the sea-farer when1 after a voyage happily consummated1 he sees them rise suddenly into view1 and the smoke curling from the old familiar chimney4 #db4 ,and certainly we are at liberty to rejoice over this4 ,the absolute clearness with which all this follows is good omen for the success of our undertaking1 since it is the method by which we arrived at our result1 which is obviously the most essential feature in it4 ,without it what advantage can our inquiry be said to have over that of others8 ,even ,kant1 for example1 whose doctrines concerning the principles of ethics were quite different1 arrived1 in the further course of his statement1 pretty much to the popular view4 ,but what we miss in him is strict logical coherence4 ,beneke has shown that the ,categorical ,imperative as ,kant used it1 may be so employed as to prove1 in the same case1 contradictory statements and so everything and nothing4#ed ,if1 none the less1 ,kant is able to arrive so often at right conclusions1 this must be attributed to the fact that from the outset he had harboured such opinions4 ,even ,hegel1 had he not known in other ways that the sky was blue1 would certainly never have succeeded by means of his dialectic in deducing this priori4 ,did he not equally succeed in demonstrating that there were seven planets1 a number accepted in his day1 but which in our time science has long left behind8 ,the causes of this phenomenon1 therefore1 are easily understood4 #dc4 ,but there is another point which appears enigmatical4 ,how does it happen that the prevailing public opinion respecting law and morality is itself1 in so many respects1 obviously right8 ,if a thinker like ,kant was unable to discover the sources from which ethical knowledge flows1 how can we believe that the common folk succeeded in drawing therefrom8 ,and if this were not the case1 how were they able1 while ignorant of the premises1 still to reach the conclusions8 ,here the phenomenon cannot possibly be explained from the fact that the right view was long before established4 ,this difficulty also resolves itself in a very simple manner when we reflect that much in our store of knowledge exists1 and contributes towards the attainment of new knowledge1 without the knowledge of the process itself being clearly present to consciousness4 ,it must not be supposed that in saying this ,i am an adherent of the wonderful philosophy of the unconscious4 ,i am speaking here only of undeniable and well known truths4 ,thus it has often been observed that for thousands of years men have drawn right conclusions without bringing the procedure and the principles which form the condition of the formal validity of the inference into clear consciousness by means of reflection4 ,indeed when ,plato first took the step of reflecting upon it1 he was led to set up an entirely false theory which assumed that every inference was a process of reminiscence4#ee ,what was perceived and experienced on earth recalled to the memory knowledge acquired in a pre-mundane existence4 ,nowadays this error has disappeared4 ,still1 false theories concerning the fundamental principles of syllogism are continually emerging1 as1 for example1 when ,albert ,lange1#ef finds them in space-perceptions and in synthetic propositions priori1 or ,alexander ,bain#eg in the experience that the moods ,barbara1 ,celarent1 etc41 have up to the present time been found to be valid in every case3 mere crude errors which overlook the immediate intuitions forming the conditions of right conclusions1 but which do not prevent ,plato1 ,lange1 and ,bain from arguing in general exactly like other people4 ,in spite of their false conception of the true fundamental principles1 these still continue to operate in their reasoning4 ,but why do ,i go so far for examples8 ,let the experiment be made with the first 8plain man0 who has just drawn a right conclusion1 and demand of him that he give you the premises of his conclusion4 ,this he will usually be unable to do and may perhaps make entirely false statements about it4 ,on requiring the same man to define a notion with which he is familiar1 he will make the most glaring mistakes and so show once again that he is not able rightly to describe his own thinking4 #dd4 ,meantime1 however dark the road to ethical knowledge might appear1 both to the 8plain man0 and to the philosopher1 we must still expect1 since the process is a complicated one and many combined principles operate therein1 that the traces of the operation of each separate principle will be evident in history1 and this fact1 even more than agreement in respect of the final results1 is a confirmation of the right theory4 ,this also1 if only the time permitted1 in what fulness would ,i not be able to lay before you6 ,who is there1 for example1 who would not1 as we have done1 regard joy as something evidently good in itself1 if only it were not joy in what is bad4 ,nor has there been any lack of writers on ethics who have asserted that pleasure and the good were strictly identical conceptions4#eh ,opposed to these were others who bore witness to the inner worth of insight and such will be supported by all unprejudiced minds4 ,many philosophers have wished to exalt knowledge above all else as the highest good4#ei ,they recognized1 however1 at the same time1 a certain inner worth in each act of virtue1 while others have carried this view so far as to recognize only in virtuous action the highest good4#fj ,on the one hand1 therefore1 we have had sufficient confirmatory tests in support of our view4 ,next with regard to the principles of choice1 how often do we not see the principle of summation applied as1 for example1 when it is said that the measure of the happiness of life as a whole and not that of the passing moment is to be considered4#fa ,and1 again1 passing beyond the limits of the self1 when1 for example1 ,aristotle says1 that the happiness of a nation seems to be a higher end than that of an individual happiness1#fb and that in the same way in a work of art1 or in an organism and similarly in the case of the family1 the part always exists for the sake of the whole2 everything is here subordinate to the 8common0 78 074#fc ,even in the case of the whole creation he makes the same principle hold good4 8,in what10 he asks1#fd 8regarding all created things consists the good1 and the best1 which is its final aim08 ,is it immanent or transcendent8 ,and he answers3 8,both10 setting forth as the transcendent aim the divine first cause1 likeness to which everything strives after1 while the immanent aim is the world-order as a whole4 ,the like testimony to the principle of summation might be taken from the lips of the ,stoics4#fe ,it reappears in every attempt to construct a theodicy from ,plato down to ,leibnitz and even later4#ff ,in the precepts of our popular religion1 again1 the operation of this principle is also distinctly visible4 ,when it ordains us to love our neighbour as ourselves1 what else is taught but that1 in the right choice1 equality 7be it our own or that of others7 shall fall with equal weight into the balance1 from which follows the subordination of the single individual to the good of the collective whole2 just as the ethical ideal of ,christianity--the ,saviour--offers himself as a sacrifice for the salvation of the world4 ,and when it is said3 8,love ,god above all else0 7and ,aristotle also says that ,god is much rather to be called the best than the world as a whole71#fg here also there is a special application of the law of summation4 ,for how else do we think of ,god than as the sum of all that is good raised to an infinite degree8 ,and so the two propositions3 that we should love our neighbour as ourselves1 and love ,god above all else1 are manifestly so closely related that we are no longer surprised to find added the words that the one law is like unto the other4 ,the law that we are to love our neighbour1 it should be carefully noted1 is not subordinated to that of love of ,god1 and derived from it1 it is1 according to the ,christian view1 not right because ,god has required it1 rather he requires it because it is by nature right2#fh and this rightness is made manifest in the same way1 and with the same clearness by means1 so to speak1 of the same ray of natural knowledge4 ,sufficient testimony has perhaps been offered to the shaping operation of those factors which have been separately set forth by us1 and so we have1 on the one hand1 a strengthening of our theory while1 on the other hand1 we have in essentials the explanation of that paradoxical anticipation of philosophical results4 #de4 ,we are not to suppose1 however1 that all has now been said4 ,not every opinion regarding law and morality holding good in society to-day1 and which has also the sanction of ethics1 flows from these pure and noble sources which1 even when hid1 have none the less discharged their waters in rich abundance4 ,many such views have arisen in a way quite unjustifiable from a logical point of view1 and an inquiry into the history of their origin shows that they take their rise in lower impulses1 in egoistic desires through a transformation due1 not to higher influences1 but simply to the instinctive force of habit4 ,it is really true1 as so many utilitarians have pointed out1 that egoism prompts men to make themselves agreeable to others and that such conduct continually practised1 develops finally into a habit which is blind to the original ends4 ,the chief reason for this is the limits of our mind1 the so-called 8narrowness of consciousness10 which does not allow of our always keeping clearly before us the more remote and final ends side by side with what is immediately in question4 ,in such a way many a one may be frequently led1 by the blind force of habit1 to have regard also for the well-being of others with a certain self-forgetfulness4 ,further1 it is true1 as some have particularly insisted1 that in history it must often have happened that a powerful person has selfishly reduced to subjection a weaker individual1 and transformed him by force of habit more and more into a willing slave4 ,and then in this slave-soul an comes in the end to operate with a blind1 but none the less powerful force1 an impelling 8you ought10 as though it were a revelation of nature regarding good and bad4 ,on every violation of a command he feels himself1 like a well-trained dog1 uneasy and inwardly tormented4 ,when such a tyrant had1 in this way1 reduced many to subjection his prudent egoism would cause him to give commands helpful to the maintenance of his horde4 ,these orders would in the same slavish manner become habitual1 and as it were1 natural to his subjects4 ,and so regard for the whole of this community would gradually become for each subject something into which he felt himself driven in the manner above described4 ,at the same time1 we may easily recognize how1 owing to the constant care exercised towards his subjects1 habits must be formed in the tyrant himself favourable to a regard for the welfare of the community4 ,it may even happen at last that1 just as in the case of the miser1 who sacrifices himself for the sake of his gold1 the tyrant may be ready to die for the maintenance of his people4 ,throughout the whole process thus described ethical principles do not exercise the slightest influence4 ,the compulsion which in this way arises1 and the opinions which as a result approve or disapprove of a certain procedure have nothing whatever to do with the natural sanction and are devoid of all ethical worth4 ,it may1 however1 be easily understood--especially if one considers how one tribe enters into relations with another and considerations of friendliness begin here too to prove advantageous1--how this kind of training may lead1 indeed one may venture to say must1 sooner or later1 lead to opinions in agreement with the principles springing from a true appreciation of the good4 #df4 ,thus also the blind1 purely habitual expectation of similar events under similar circumstances which animals1 and also we ourselves1 practise in countless instances1 often coincide with the results which a complete induction according to the principles of the calculation of probability would1 in the same case1 have brought about4 ,the very similarity of result has led people even with a psychological education1#fi to regard the two processes as exactly identical1 although they stand wide as the poles asunder1 the one completing itself by means of a purely blind instinct1 while the other is illumined by mathematical evidence4 ,we ourselves should1 therefore1 be well on our guard against supposing in such pseudo-ethical developments the concealed influence of the true ethical sanction4 #dg4 ,great1 however1 as is the contrast1 still even these lower processes have their worth4 ,nature--and this has been often insisted on#gj--;frequently does well in leaving much which concerns our welfare to instinctive impulses like hunger and thirst rather than leave everything to our reason4 ,this1 also1 is confirmed in our case4 ,in those very early times in which1 as ,i conceded to ,ihering1 7why you will1 perhaps1 now be better able to see17 nearly every trace of ethical thought and feeling was absent1 much nevertheless was done which was a preparation for true virtue4 ,public laws1 however much in the first instance established under the influence of lower motives1 were yet preliminary conditions for the free unfolding of our noblest capacities4 ,nor is it a matter of no consequence that1 under the influence of this training1 certain passions became moderated and certain dispositions implanted which made it easier to follow the true moral law in the same direction4 ,catiline's courage was assuredly not the true virtue of courage if ,aristotle is right when he says that they only have such who go to danger and to death 8 10 8for the sake of the morally beautiful40#ga ,augustine might have made use of this instance when he said3 8virtutes ethnicorum splendida vitia40 ,but who will deny that if such a man as ,catiline had been converted1 the dispositions he had acquired earlier would have made it easier for him to venture to extremes in the service of the good too8 ,in this way1 the ground was made receptive for the admission of truly ethical impulses and therein lay a powerful encouragement to the propagation of truth on the part of those who were foremost in the discovery of ethical knowledge1 and first to hear the voice of a natural sanction4 ,it is in this sense that ,aristotle observed that it is not every one who can study ethics4 ,he who is to hear about law and morality1 must be already well conducted by dint of habit4 ,in the case of others1 he thinks1 it is but a waste of pains4#gb ,indeed1 still more may be said in praise of the services rendered to the recognition of natural law and morality by these pre-ethical1 though not pre-historical1 times4 ,the legal ordinances and customs formed in this time1 owing to the reasons previously assigned1 approached so closely to what ethics demands1 that this peculiar kind of mimicry blinded many to the absence of a more thorough going affinity4 ,what1 in the one case1 a blind impulse and in the other1 knowledge of the good exalts into a law1 is often completely the same in substance4 ,the legislative moral authority found therefore in these already codified laws and customs the rough drafts1 as it were1 of laws1 which with a few changes1 it could sanction without more ado4 ,these were the more valuable because1 as seems required from a utilitarian point of view1 they were adapted to the special circumstances of the people4 ,a comparison of the one constitution with the other made this noticeable1 and early helped to lead to the important knowledge of the real relativity of natural right and of natural morality4 ,who knows whether otherwise1 it would have been possible1 even for an ,aristotle1 to succeed to the degree in which he did in steering clear of all cut and dried doctrinaire theories8 ,so much1 therefore1 concerning the pre-ethical times1 in order that these may not be denied the acknowledgment which they deserve4 #dh4 ,nevertheless it was then night2 though a night which heralded the coming day1 and the dawn of that day witnessed assuredly the most glorious sunrise which1 in the history of the world is yet to rise into full splendour4 ,i say1 is to rise1 not has risen1 for we still see the light struggling with the powers of darkness4 ,true ethical motives1 in private as in public life1 are still far from being everywhere the determining standard4 ,these forces--to use the language of the poet,a--prove themselves still too little developed to hold together the structure of the world2 and so nature1--and we have need to be thankful that it is so--keeps the machine going by hunger and love1 and1 we must also add1 by all those other dark strivings which1 as we have seen1 may be developed from self-seeking desires4 ,a ,schiller4 #di4 ,of these1 and their psychological laws the jurist must1 therefore1 if he would truly understand his time1 and influence it beneficially1 take cognizance1 as well as of the doctrines of natural right and natural morality which our inquiry has shown to be not the first but--in so far as hope in the realization of a complete ideal may be cherished at all--will be the last in the history of the development of law and morality4 ,thus the near relationships of jurisprudence and politics of which ,leibnitz spoke1 become evident in their full range4 ,plato has said3 8,it will never be well with the state until the true philosopher is king1 or kings philosophize rightly40 ,in our constitutional times we should express ourselves better by saying that there will never be a change for the better regarding the many evils in our national life until the authorities1 instead of abolishing the limited philosophical culture required for law students by the existing regulations1 shall rather strive hard to secure that for their noble profession they shall really receive an adequate philosophical culture4 ,,notes #a 7p4 #b74 ,cf4 8ber die ,entstehung des ,rechtsgefhls40 ,lecture by ,dr4 ,rudolf von ,ihering1 delivered before the ,vienna ,law ,society1 ,march #ab1 #ahhd 7,allgem4 ,juristenzeitung1 #g ,jahrg41 ,no4 #aa seq41 ,vienna1 ,march #af-;,april #ac1 #ahhd74 ,cf4 further1 v4 ,ihering1 ,der ,zweck im ,recht1 vol4 ii4 ,leipzig1 #ahgg-hc4 #b 7p4 #b74 ,for the first point1 cf4 ,allgem4 ,juristenzeitung1 #g ,jahrg4 p4 #abb seq41 ,zweck im ,recht1 vol4 ii4 p4 #aji seq4 ,for the second point ,allgem4 ,juristenzeitung1 #g ,jahrg4 p4 #aga1 ,zweck im ,recht1 pp4 #aah-abc4 ,it is here denied that there is any absolutely valid ethical rule 7pp4 #aah1 #abb seq472 further every 8psychological0 treatment of ethics1 according to which ethics is represented 8as twin sister of logic0 is contested4 #c 7p4 #d74 ,allgem4 ,juristenzeitung1 #g ,jahrg41 p4 #adg2 cf4 ,zweck im ,recht1 vol4 ii4 p4 #abd seq4 #d 7p4 #d74 ,aristotle1 ,politics1 i4 #b1 p4 #abeb b4 #bd4 #e 7p4 #d74 ,cf4 e4g4 ,allgem4 ,juristenzeitung1 #g ,jahrg4 p4 #adf4 #f 7p4 #e74 ,rep4 #b4 #ca4 #g 7p4 #e74 ,dig4 #a4 #h1 #i4 #h 7p4 #f74 ,amongst the numerous adherents of this view and one of its best advocates is ,j4 ,s4 ,mill in his ,utilitarianism1 chap4 iii4 #i 7p4 #f74 ,here also1 along with many others1 ,j4 ,s4 ,mill may be cited4 ,the motives of hope and fear are1 according to him1 the external2 the motives first described1 the feelings developed by habit1 the internal sanction4 ,utilitarianism1 chap4 iii4 #aj 7p4 #g74 ,cf4 espec4 here a discussion in ,james ,mill's ,fragment on ,mackintosh1 printed by ,j4 ,s4 ,mill in the second edition of his ,analysis of the phenomena of the human mind1 vol4 ii4 p4 #cji seq42 and ,grote's powerful essay published by ,a4 ,bain under the title1 8,fragments on ,ethical ,subjects1 by the late ,george ,grote1 ,f4,r4,s410 being a selection from his posthumous papers1 ,london1 #ahgf2 ,espec4 ,essay #a1 ,on the ,origin and ,nature of ,ethical ,sentiment4 #aa 7p4 #i74 ,d4 ,hume1 ,an ,enquiry concerning the ,principles of ,morals1 ,london1 #agea4 #ab 7p4 #i74 ,herbart1 ,lehrbuch zur ,einleitung in die ,philosophie1 #ha seq4 ,collected ,works1 vol4 i4 p4 #abd seq4 #ac 7p4 #i74 ,this comparison with logic should be my best defence against the charge of placing ,herbart's doctrine in a false light4 ,were the logical criterion to consist in judgments of taste experienced on the appearance of thought-processes in accordance with or opposition to rule1 it would then1 in comparison with what it actually is 7the internal self-evidence of a process in accordance with rule7 have to be called external4 ,similarly ,herbart's criterion of ethics is rightly characterized as external1 however loudly ,herbartians may insist that in the judgment of taste which arises spontaneously on the contemplation of certain relations of will1 an inner superiority regarding these relations is recognizable4 #ad 7p4 #aj74 ,in his ,grundlegung zur ,metaphysik der ,sitten1 ,kant enunciates his ,categorical ,imperative in the following forms3 8,act only in accordance with that maxim which you can at the same time will should become a universal law10 and 8,act as if the maxim of your action were by your will to be raised to a universal law40 ,in the ,critique of ,practical ,reason it runs 8,act so that the maxim of your will could on each occasion be valid as a universal legislative principle10 i4e4 as ,kant himself explains1 in such a way that the maxim1 when raised to a universal law1 does not lead to contradictions and consequent self-abrogation4 ,the consciousness of this fundamental law was1 for ,kant1 a fact of pure reason1 thereby proclaiming itself to be legislative 7sic volo sic jubeo74 ,beneke has already observed 7,grundlinien der ,sittenlehre1 vol4 ii4 p4 xviii41 #ahda2 cf4 his ,grundlegung zur ,physik der ,sitten1 a counterpart to ,kant's ,grundlegung zur ,metaphysik der ,sitten1 #ahbb7 that it is nothing more than a 8psychologische ,dichtung10 and to-day no one able to judge is any longer in doubt concerning it4 ,it deserves to be noted that even philosophers like ,mansel1 who have the highest reverence for ,kant1 admit that the ,categorical ,imperative is a fiction and absolutely untenable4 ,the ,categorical ,imperative has at the same time another and not less serious defect1 i4e4 that even when admitted1 it leads to no ethical conclusions4 ,kant fails1 as ,mill 7,utilitarianism1 chap4 i47 rightly says 8in an almost grotesque fashion0 to deduce what he seeks4 ,his favourite example of a deduction1 by which he illustrates his manner of procedure not only in his ,grundlegung zur ,metaphysik der ,sitten but also in the ,critique of ,practical ,reason is as follows3 ,may a person1 he asks1 retain for himself a possession which has been entrusted to him without a receipt or other acknowledgment8 ,he answers1 ,no4 ,for he thinks1 were the opposite maxim to be raised to a law1 nobody1 under such circumstances1 would entrust anything to anybody4 ,the law would then be without possibility of application1 therefore impracticable and so self-abrogated4 ,it may easily be seen that ,kant's argumentation is false1 indeed absurd4 ,if1 in consequence of the law1 certain actions ceased to be practised1 the law exercises an influence2 it therefore still exists and has in no way annulled itself4 ,how ridiculous would it appear if the following question were treated after an analogous fashion3 8,may ,i yield to a person who desires to bribe me80 ,yes1 since1 were ,i to think of the opposite maxim as raised to a universal law1 then nobody would seek any longer to bribe another2 therefore the law would be without application1 therefore1 impracticable1 and so self-abrogated4 #ae 7p4 #aa74 ,cf4 ,j4 ,s4 ,mill1 ,system of ,deductive and ,inductive ,logic1 vol4 iv4 chap4 iv4 section vi4 7towards the end72 vol4 vi4 chap4 ii4 section iv4 and elsewhere1 e4g4 in his ,utilitarianism1 ,essays on ,religion1 and in his article on ,comte and ,positivism1 part ii4 #af 7p4 #aa74 ,cf4 with what has been said in the lecture the first chapter of the ,nicomachian ,ethics1 and it will be seen that ,ihering's 8fundamental thought0 in his work ,der ,zweck im ,recht1 vol4 i4 p4 vi41 viz43 8that no legal formula exists which does not owe its origin to an end10 is as old as ethics itself4 #ag 7p4 #ab74 ,cases may arise where the consequence of certain efforts remains in doubt1 and two courses are open3 one presenting the prospect of a greater good but with less probability1 the other a lesser good but with a greater probability4 ,in choosing here1 account must be taken of the degree of probability4 ,if ,a is three times better than ,b1 but ,b has ten times as many chances of being attained as ,a1 then practical wisdom will prefer course ,b4 ,supposing that1 under like circumstances1 such a procedure always takes place1 then 7in accordance with the law of great numbers7 the better would1 generally speaking1 be realized1 a sufficient number of cases being assumed1 and so such a manner of choosing would still obviously correspond to the principle laid down in the text1 i4e4 8,choose the best that is attainable40 ,the full significance of this remark will be made still more evident in the course of the inquiry4 #ah 7p4 #ab74 ,this truth was familiar to ,aristotle 7cf4 e4g4 ,de ,anima1 iii4 #h74 ,the ,middle ,ages maintained it1 but expressed it unfortunately in the proposition3 nihil est in intelluctu1 quod non prius fuerit in sensu4 ,the notions 8willing10 8concluding0 are not gained from sensuous perception2 the term 8sensuous0 would in that case have to be taken so generally that all distinction between 8sensuous0 and 8super-sensuous0 disappears4 ,these notions have their origin in certain concrete impressions with psychical content 7,anschauungen psychischen ,inhalts74 ,from the same source arise the notions 8end10 8cause0 7we observe1 for example1 a causal relation existing between our belief in the premises and in the conclusion71 8impossibility0 and 8necessity0 7we gain these from judgments which accept or reject not merely assertorically1 but1 as it is usually expressed1 apodictically17 and many other notions which some modern philosophers1 failing in detecting the true origin of them1 have sought to regard as categories given priori4 ,i may mention1 by the way1 that ,i am well aware ,sigwart and others influenced by him have recently questioned the peculiar nature of apodictic as opposed to assertorical judgments4 ,but this is a psychological error which it is not the place to discuss here4 ,cf4 note #bg1 p4 #hc sub4 #ai 7p4 #ab74 ,this doctrine in germ is also found in ,aristotle2 cf4 espec4 ,metaph43 #ae1 p4 #ajba a4 #bi4 ,this term 8intentional10 like many other terms for important notions1 comes from the scholastics4 #bj 7p4 #ac74 ,the question of the grounds of this division is discussed in more detail in my ,psychologie vom empirischen ,standpunkte 7#ahgd1 ,bk4 ii4 chap4 vi42 cf4 also chap4 i4 section #e74 ,the statements there made regarding this division ,i still consider to be substantially correct in spite of many modifications respecting points of detail4 #ba 7p4 #ac74 ,meditat4 iii4 8,nunc autem ordo videtur exigere1 ut prius omnes meas cogitationes 7all psychical acts7 in certa genera distribuam4444 ,quaedam ex his tanquam rerum imagines sunt1 quibus solis proprie convenit ideae nomen1 ut cum hominem1 vel chimaeram1 vel coelum1 vel angelum1 vel ,deum cogito2 aliae vero alias quasdam praeterea formas habent1 ut cum volo cum timeo1 cum affirmo1 cum nego1 semper quidem aliquam rem ut subjectum meae cogitationis apprehendo1 sed aliquid etiam amplius quam istius rei similitudinem cogitatione complector2 et ex his aliae voluntates sive affectus aliae autem judicia appellantur40 ,strangely enough this clear passage has not prevented ,windelband 7,strassb4 philos4 ,abhandl4 p4 #aga7 from ascribing to ,descartes the view that the judgment is an act of volition4 ,what led him astray is a discussion in the fourth ,meditation on the influence of the will in the formation of judgment4 ,even scholastics like ,suarez had ascribed too much to this influence1 and ,descartes goes so far in exaggeration of this dependence that he considers every judgment 7even the self-evident judgments7 as the work of the will4 ,but to 8produce the judgment0 and 8to be the judgment0 are yet manifestly not one and the same4 ,and1 therefore1 although ,descartes1 in the passage cited1 allows his view as to the influence of the will to appear1 and probably it is only on this account that he assigns to the judgment the third place in the fundamental classification of psychical phenomena1 yet none the less he says without contradiction3 aliae voluntates--aliae judicia appellantur4 ,more illusive are a couple of passages in his later writings1 i4e4 in his ,principia ,philosophiae 7i4 #cb71 published three years after the ,meditations1 and in a work also written three years later3 ,notae in ,programma quoddam1 sub finem ,anni #afdg in ,belgio editum1 cum hoc ,titulo3 ,explicatio mentis humanae sive animae rationalis1 ubi explicatur quid sit1 et quid esse possit40 ,particularly might the passage in the ,principles lead to the opinion that ,descartes must have changed his view1 and it is astonishing that ,windelband has not appealed to this passage rather than to that in the ,meditations4 ,we read here3--,ordines modi cognitandi quos in nobis experimur1 ad duos generales referri possunt2 quorum unus est1 perceptio sive operatio intellectus2 alius vero volitio sive operatio voluntatis4 ,nam sentire1 imaginari1 et pure intellegere1 sunt tantum diversi modi percipiendi2 ut et cupere1 aversari1 affirmare1 negare1 dubitare1 sunt diversi modi volendi4 ,at first sight this passage appears to be so clearly in contradiction to the one in the third ,meditation that1 as we have said1 it is scarcely possible to avoid the supposition that ,descartes had meantime rejected his thesis as to the three fundamental classes of psychical phenomena1 so shunning ,scylla only to plunge into ,charybdis2 avoiding the old mistake of confusing the judgment with the idea 7,vorstellung71 he would now seem to confound it with the will4 ,but a more attentive examination of all the circumstances will suffice to exonerate ,descartes from such a charge1 and this on the following grounds3 7#a7 ,there is not the slightest sign that ,descartes was ever conscious of having become untrue to the view expressed in the ,meditations4 7#b7 ,further1 in the year #afdg 7three years after the publication of the ,meditations and shortly before writing the ,notae to his ,programma7 the ,meditations appeared in a translation revised by ,descartes himself1 where1 remarkably enough1 not the slightest alteration is to be found in the decisive passage in the third ,meditation4 8,entre mes penses10 it reads1 8quelques unes sont commes les images des choses1 et c'est celles-l scules que convient proprement le nom d'ide4444 ,d'autres1 outre cela ont quelques autres formes2 444 et de ce genre de penses les unes sont appeles volonts ou affections1 et les autres jugements40 7#c7 ,in the ,principles itself he says directly after 7i4 ,no4 #db7 that all our errors depend upon our will 7a voluntate pendere72 but so far is he from regarding the 8error0 as an act of volition1 that he says there is no one who errs voluntarily 7nemo est qui velit falli74 ,still clearer is it that he does not regard the judgment like the desires and dislikes as inner activities of the will itself1 but only as a product of the will1 since he at once adds3 sed longe aliud est velle falli quam velle assentiri iis1 in quibus contingit errorem reperiri10 etc4 ,he does not say of the will that it desires1 affirms1 assents1 but that it wills the assent2 so also1 not that it is true but that it desires the truth 7veritatis assequendae cupiditas 444 efficit1 ut 444 judicium ferant74 ,as to ,descartes' real view1 therefore1 there can be no doubt2 his doctrine has not in this respect suffered the slightest change4 ,it only remains1 therefore1 to come to an understanding of his obviously variable modes of expression1 and this is1 ,i believe1 solved incontrovertibly in the following manner4 ,descartes1 while regarding will and judgment as two classes differing fundamentally1 none the less finds that in contradistinction to the first fundamental class--that of ideas--these have something in common4 ,in the third ,meditation he designates 7cf4 the above passage7 as the common element the fact that although essentially based upon an idea1 in both alike there is contained a further special form4 ,in the fourth ,meditation a further common character appears1 i4e4 that the will decides concerning them2 not only can it determine and suspend its own acts1 but also those of the judgment4 ,it is this common character which he was bound to regard as especially1 indeed all important1 in the first part of the ,principles1 xxix4-xlii4 ,accordingly1 he classes them1 in opposition to the ideas 7which he calls operationes intellectus7 under the term operationes voluntatis4 ,in the ,notae to the ,programma he calls them distinctly in the same sense1 8determinationes voluntatis40 8,ego enim1 cum viderem1 praeter perceptionem1 quae praerequiritur ut judicemus1 opus esse affirmatione vel negatione ad formam judicii constituendam1 nobisque saepe esse liberum ut cohibeamus assensionem1 etiamsi rem percipiamus1 ipsum actum judicandi1 qui non nisi in assensu1 hoc est in affirmatione vel negatione consistit1 non retuli ad perceptionem intellectus sed ad determinationem voluntatis40 ,he does not even hesitate in the ,principles to term both these two classes of modi cogitandi1 8modi volendi0 the context seeming sufficiently to indicate that he means only to express thereby the fact that they fall within the domain of the will4 ,in further support of this explanation we may compare the scholastic terminology into which ,descartes as a young man was initiated4 ,it was customary to denote under the term actus voluntatis not merely the movement of the will itself but also the act performed in obedience to the will4 ,in accordance with this custom1 the actus voluntatis fell into two classes2 the actus elicitus voluntatis and the actus imperatus voluntatis4 ,in a similar manner ,descartes groups the class which1 according to him1 was only possible as an actus imperatus of the will along with his actus elicitus4 ,there is here1 therefore1 no question of a common fundamental character of the intentional relation4 ,clear as all this is to those who carefully attach due weight to the various moments1 it would yet appear that ,spinoza 7probably misled rather by the passage in the ,principles than by that cited by ,windelband71 anticipates ,windelband in this misunderstanding of the ,cartesian doctrine4 ,in his ,ethics1 ii4 prop4 #di1 he actually1 and in the most real sense1 regards the affirmatio and negatio as 8volitiones mentis10 and by a further confusion1 comes finally to obliterate the distinction between the two classes ideae and voluntates4 8,voluntas et intellectus unum et idem sunt0 his thesis now reads1 so overthrowing not only the three-fold classification of ,descartes1 but also the old ,aristotelian dual classification4 ,spinoza has here1 as usual1 done nothing else than corrupt the teaching of his great master4 #bb 7p4 #ac74 ,i do not mean to say that the classification is1 universally recognized to-day4 ,it would not even be possible to regard as certain the ,principle of ,contradiction if in order to do so we were to await universal assent4 ,in the present instance it is not difficult to understand that old1 deeply-rooted prejudices cannot all at once be banished4 ,but that even under such circumstances it has not been possible to urge a single important objection affords the best confirmation of our doctrine4 ,some1 as for instance1 ,windelband--while giving up the attempt at including judgment and idea 7,vorstellung7 in one fundamental class1 on the other hand believe it possible to subsume judgment under feeling1 thus falling back into the error which ,hume committed earlier in his inquiry into the nature of belief4 ,according to these writers1 to affirm implies an act of approval1 an appreciation on the part of the feelings1 while denial is an act of disapproval1 a feeling of repugnance4 ,despite a certain analogy the confusion is hard to understand4 ,there are people who recognize both the goodness of ,god and the wickedness of the devil1 the being of ,ormuzd and the being of ,ahriman1 with an equal degree of conviction1 and yet1 while prizing the nature of the one above all else1 they feel themselves absolutely repelled by that of the other4 ,since we love knowledge and hate error it is1 of course1 proper that those judgments we hold to be right 7and this is true of all those judgments which we ourselves make7 are for this very reason dear to us1 i4e4 we estimate them in some way or other through feeling4 ,but who on this account would be misled into regarding the judgments themselves which are loved as acts of loving84 ,the confusion would be almost as gross as if we should fail to distinguish wife and child1 money and possessions1 from the activity which is directed towards these1 inasmuch they are the objects of affection4 ,cf4 also what has been said 7note #ba7 with regard to ,windelband1 where1 misunderstanding ,descartes1 he ascribes to him the same teaching2 further1 note #bf 7on the unity of the idea of the good7 as well as what is urged by ,sigwart in the note 7in part much to the point7 on ,windelband 7,logic1 vol4 i4 chap4 ii4 p4 #aef seq474 ,to those who1 despite all that has been said1 still wish further arguments for the distinction between the second and third fundamental classes1 ,i may1 perhaps1 be allowed to refer them1 by anticipation1 to my ,descriptive ,psychology1 which ,i have alluded to in the preface as an almost completed work1 and which will appear if not as a continuation1 yet still as a further development of my ,psychology from the ,empirical ,standpoint4 ,as against ,windelband1 ,i here add the following observations3 #a4 ,it is false and a serious oversight1 as he himself will be convinced on reading again in my ,psychology1 vol4 i4 p4 #bfb1 when he 7p4 #agb7 makes me assert1 and that too as a quotation from my own work1 that 8love and hate0 is not an appropriate term for the third fundamental class4 #b4 ,it is false1 and a quite unjustifiable supposition when 7p4 #agh7 he ascribes to me the opinion that the classification of judgments according to quality is the only essential classification belonging to the act of judgment itself4 ,i believe exactly the contrary4 ,i regard1 for example 7of course in opposition to ,windelband71 the distinction between assertorical and apodictic judgments 7cf4 here note #bg1 p4 #hc71 as also the distinction between self-evident and blind judgments as belonging and highly essential1 to the act of judgment itself4 ,other differences1 again1 especially the distinction between simple and compound acts of judgment1 ,i might mention4 ,for it is not every compound judgment that can be resolved into quite simple elements1 and something similar takes place also in the case of certain notions1 a fact known to ,aristotle4 ,what is red8--,red colour4 ,what is colour8--,the quality of colour4 ,the difference1 it is seen1 contains in both cases the notion of the genus4 ,the separating of the one logical element from the other is only possible from the one side4 ,a similar one-sided capacity to separate appears also in certain compound judgments4 ,j4 ,s4 ,mill is1 therefore1 quite wrong when he 7,deductive and ,inductive ,logic1 vol4 i4 chap4 iv4 section #c71 regards as ridiculous the old classification of judgments into simple and compound1 and thinks that the procedure in such a case is exactly as if one should wish to divide horses into single horses and teams of horses2 otherwise the same argument would hold good against the classification of conceptions into simple and compound4 #c4 ,it is false1 though an error which finds almost universal acceptance1 and one from which ,i myself at the time of writing the first volume of my ,psychology was not yet free1 that the so-called degree of conviction consists in a degree of intensity of the judgment which can be brought into analogy with the intensity of pleasure and pain4 ,had ,windelband charged me with this error ,i would have acknowledged the complete justice of the charge4 ,instead of this he finds fault with me because ,i recognize intensity with regard to the judgment1 only in a sense analogous1 and not identical to that in the case of feeling1 and because ,i assert the impossibility of comparing in respect of magnitude1 the supposed intensity of the belief and the real intensity of feeling4 ,here we have one of the results of his improved theory of judgment6 ,if the degree of conviction of my belief that #b #a #c were one of intensity how powerful would this be6 ,and if the said belief were to be identified1 as by ,windelband 7p4 #ahf71 with feeling1 not merely regarded as analogous to feeling1 how destructive to our nervous system would the violence of such a shock to the feelings prove6 ,every physician would be compelled to warn the public against the study of mathematics as calculated to destroy health4 7,cf4 with regard to this so-called degree of conviction the view of ,henry ,newman in his interesting work3 ,an ,essay in ,aid of a ,grammar of ,assent--a work scarcely noticed in ,germany47 #d4 ,when ,windelband 7p4 #ahc7 wonders how ,i can regard the word 8is0 in such propositions as 8,god is10 8,a man is0 7ein ,mensch ist71 8,a lack is0 7ein ,mangel ist71 8,a possibility is10 8,a truth is10 7i4e4 ,there is a truth71 etc41 as having the same meaning and finds it extraordinary 7#ahd1 note #a7 in the author of ,von der mannigfachen ,bedeutung des ,seienden nach ,aristoteles that he should fail to recognize the manifold significance of 8to be10 ,i can only reply that he who in this view does not perceive the simple consequence of my theory of the judgment can hardly have understood this doctrine4 ,with regard to ,aristotle it never occurs to him1 while dividing the 80 in the sense of reality into various categories1 and into an 8 and 01 to do the same with the 80 transforming what is the expression of an idea into that of a judgment and the 8 0 as he calls it4 ,this could only be done by those who1 like ,herbart and many others after him1 did not know how to hold apart the notion of being in the sense of absolute position and being in the sense of reality 7cf4 the following note74 #e4 ,i have just said that there exist simple and compound judgments1 and that many a compound judgment is not1 without a residue1 resolvable into simple judgments4 ,special attention must be paid to this in seeking to convert judgments otherwise expressed into the existential form4 ,it is self-evident that only simple judgments1 i4e4 such as are1 strictly speaking1 without parts1 are so convertible4 ,i may therefore be excused for not thinking it necessary to emphasize this expressly in my ,psychology4 ,if this restriction hold good universally it is1 of course1 valid also of the categorical form4 ,in the propositions categorical in form1 which the formal logicians have denoted by the signs ,a4,e4,i4 and ,o4 they wish to express strictly simple judgments4 ,these are therefore one and all convertible into the existential form 7cf4 my ,psychology1 vol4 i4 p4 #bhc74 ,the same1 however1 will not hold good when propositions categorical in form contain in consequence of an ambiguity of expression 7cf4 p4 #abj1 note to ,appendix7 a plurality of judgments4 ,in such a case the existential form may certainly be the expression of a simple judgment equivalent to the compound one1 but cannot be the expression of the judgment itself4 ,this is a point which ,windelband ought to have considered in examining 7p4 #ahd7 the proposition3 8,the rose is a flower0 with respect to its convertibility into an existential proposition4 ,he is quite right in protesting against its conversion into the proposition3 8,there is no rose which is not a flower10 but he is not equally right in ascribing this conversion to me4 ,neither in the passage cited by him nor elsewhere have ,i made such a conversion1 and ,i consider it just as false as that attempted by ,windelband and all such as may be attempted by anybody else4 ,the judgment here expressed in the proposition is made up of two judgments of which one is the recognition of the subject 7whether it be that thereby is meant 8rose0 in the ordinary sense1 or 8what is called rose10 8what is understood by rose071 and this1 as we have just said1 is not always the case where a proposition is given of the form3 ,all ,a is ,b4 ,unfortunately ,land also has overlooked this1 the only one among my critics who has succeeded in comprehending1 in their necessary connection with the principle1 what ,windelband has termed the 8mysterious0 hints which ,i have thrown out towards the reform of elementary logic1 and in deducing them correctly from it4 7,cf4 ,land1 8,on a supposed improvement in ,formal ,logic0 in the papers of the ,kgl4 ,niederlndischen ,akademie der ,wissenschaften1 #ahgf47 ,i conclude with a curiosity recently furnished by ,steinthal in his ,zeitschrift fr ,vlkerpsychologie 7chap4 xviii4 p4 #age74 ,i there read with astonishment3 8,brentano's confusion in completely severing judgments from idea and thoughts 767 and grouping the judgments as acts of recognition or rejection1 with love and hate 7667 is instantly removed if such 787 a judgment1 as an aesthetic judgment is termed 8,beurteilen0 7674 ,probably ,steinthal has never once glanced into my ,psychology1 and has only read ,windelband's statement concerning it2 this1 however1 so hastily that ,i hope he will not be ungrateful at my sending his lines to ,windelband for correction4 #bc 7p4 #ad74 ,miklosich1 ,subjectlose ,stze1 second edition1 ,vienna1 #ahhc4 ,in order to make the reader familiar with the contents of this valuable little book a notice written at the time for the ,vienna ,evening ,post may prove useful4 ,through an oversight it was printed as a feuilleton in the ,vienna newspaper4 ,as no one certainly would look for it there1 ,i will include it here by way of an appendix4 ,meantime1 ,sigwart's monograph1 ,the ,impersonalia has appeared1 in which he opposes ,miklosich4 ,marty has submitted this1 as well as 7shortly before7 the corresponding section in ,sigwart's ,logic to a telling criticism in the ,vierteljahrsschrift fr wissenschaftliche ,philosopie1 with regard to which criticism ,sigwart1 though without any reasonable ground1 has shown himself highly indignant4 8,il se fache10 the ,french say1 8donc il a tort40 ,that ,sigwart's theory in its essential points has not succeeded1 even ,steinthal really allows1 though in his ,zeitschrift 7chap4 xviii4 p4 #agb seq47 he burns thick clouds of incense to the writer of the monograph1 and even in his preface to the fourth edition of his ,origin of ,language applauds a form of conduct which every true friend of that deserving man 7,sigwart7 must regret4 ,after the high praise awarded to him at the outset1 one feels somewhat disappointed finally by the criticism4 ,steinthal rejects 7pp4 #agg-ahj7 ,sigwart's theory on its grammatical side4 ,there would only remain therefore as really successful ,sigwart's psychological theory4 ,but the psychological portion is not that concerning which ,steinthal's estimate is authoritative2 for in that case1 one would be bound to take seriously the following remark3 8,in the proposition3 8,da bckt sich's hinunter mit liebendem ,blick0 7a line from ,schiller's ,diver71 it is obvious that everybody must think of the king's daughter1 but it is not she which stands before me but a subjectless 8sich hinunter-bcken10 and now ,i have all the more fellow-feeling for her4 ,according to my 7,steinthal's7 psychology1 ,i should say the idea of the king's daughter 8fluctuates0 7schwingt7 but does not enter into consciousness40 ,this calls for something more than the old saying3 ,sapienti sat4 ,i ,the psychological theory of ,sigwart shows itself in all its weakness when he seeks to give an account of the notion of 8existence40 ,it has been already recognized by ,aristotle1 that this notion is gained by reflection upon the affirmative judgment4 ,but ,sigwart1 like most modern logicians1 neglects to make use of this hint4 ,instead of saying that to the existent belongs everything of which the affirmative judgment is true1 he becomes repeatedly1 and once more in the second edition of his logic 7pp4 #hh-ie7 involved in diffuse discussions upon the notion of being and upon existential propositions1 which cannot in any way conduce to clearness1 seeing that they move in false directions4 8,to be10 according to ,sigwart1 expresses a relation 7pp4 #hh1 #ie72 if it be asked3 ,what kind of a relation8 the answer would1 at first sight 7#ib71 appear to be1 a relation to me as thinking4 ,but no2 the existential proposition asserts just this3 8that the existing also exists1 apart from its relation to me and to another thinking being40 ,it cannot1 therefore1 be 8a relation to me as thinking40 ,but what other relation can be meant8 ,not until p4 #id is this brought out more clearly4 ,the relation ought to mean 7of course he adds 8zunchst01 provisionally7 the agreement 78identity0 ib47 of the thing represented with a possible impression 78einem ,wahrnehmbaren0 ib4 8something which may be perceived by me10 ib4 p4 #ij74 ,now it will be immediately recognized that this notion of existence is too narrow2 for it might very well be asserted that much exists which it is not possible to perceive1 e4g4 a past and a future1 an empty space1 and any sort of deficiency1 a possibility or impossibility1 etc41 etc4 ,it is therefore not surprising that ,sigwart himself seeks to widen the notion4 ,but he does this in a manner which ,i find it difficult to understand4 ,at first sight he appears to say in order that something may exist it is not necessary that it can be perceived by me2 it is enough if it can be perceived by anybody4 ,or what else can be meant when ,sigwart1 after what has just been said1 that existence was the agreement of the thing represented with a possible impression1 thus continues3 8,that which exists stands not merely in this relation to me but to all other existing beings80 ,it cannot surely mean that ,sigwart is inclined to ascribe to every existing being the capacity to receive every impression4 ,it may be he only wishes to say that everything which exists stands to every other existing being in the relation of existence1 and then it might be concluded from what immediately follows that this rather meaningless definition is intended to express that existence is the capacity to act or to be acted upon4 78,what exists 444 stands in causal relations to the rest of the world02 similar also is p4 #ia1 note3 the existent is something which 8can exercise effects upon me and others407 ,finally1 however1 there is some ground for thinking ,sigwart would say3 what exists is that which can be perceived or can be inferred as perceivable1 for he adds3 8hence 7on account of this causal relation7 from what is perceivable also an existence which is merely inferred may be asserted40 ,that all this is equally to be rejected it is not difficult to recognize4 ,for 7#a7 ,to 8infer0 the existence of something does not mean so much as 8to infer that it is capable of being perceived40 ,if1 for example1 the existence of atoms and of empty spaces could be assured by inference1 we should still be very far from proving their perceptibility either to ourselves or to some other being4 ,if any one were to conclude the existence of ,god while giving up the attempt 8to give vividness0 to the thought by anthropomorphic means1 he would not on this account believe that ,god must be perceptible to one of his creatures or even that he is the object of his own perception4 #b4 ,from this point of view it would be absurd for any one to say3 8,i am convinced that there is much the existence of which can neither be perceived at any time or even inferred by anybody40 ,for that would mean3 8,i am convinced that much can be perceived or can be inferred to be capable of perception which yet can never be perceived or inferred40 ,who does not recognize here how far ,sigwart has strayed from the true notion of existence6 #c4 ,should ,sigwart wish in this passage to widen the notion of existence to such a degree as to think that existence is that which can either be perceived or inferred from some perceivable object1 or again1 stands in some sort of causal relation to what is perceivable1 it might be replied--if indeed such a monstrous notion of existence still require refutation--that even this notion is still too narrow4 ,if1 for example1 ,i say3 ,it may be that an empty space exists but this can never with certainty be known by any one1 ,i thereby confess that existence may perhaps belong to empty space2 but ,i deny most definitely that it is perceptible1 or that it is to be inferred from that which is perceptible4 ,in regard to relations of cause and effect on the other hand1 it is of course impossible that empty space 7which is certainly no thing7 can stand in such a relation to anything perceivable4 ,we should thus once again arrive at an absurd meaning in interpretation of an assertion in no way absurd4 ,how wrongly ,sigwart has analysed the notion of existence is also proved very simply by means of the following proposition3 ,a real centaur does not exist2 a centaur in idea1 however1 certainly exists1 and that as often as ,i imagine it4 ,whoever does not clearly recognize here the distinction of the 8 i4e4 in the sense of existing1 from in the sense of real 7wesenhaft7 will ,i fear hardly be brought to recognize it by the fullest illustrations which might be furnished by further examples4 ,we may1 however1 also consider briefly the following point3 ,according to ,sigwart1 the knowledge of the existence of anything consists in the knowledge of the agreement of something represented in idea with1 let us say1 1 since ,i do not clearly understand with what4 ,what now is necessary in order to recognize the agreement of something with something else8 ,manifestly1 the knowledge of everything which is required in order that this agreement should really exist4 ,but this requires 7#a7 that the one element exist1 7#b7 that the other element exist1 and 7#c7 that between them there exist the relation of identity since what does not exist can be neither like something nor different from it4 ,but the knowledge of the first element constitutes already in itself a knowledge of existence4 ,hence the knowledge of the two remaining elements is no longer necessary to the recognition of any existence1 and ,sigwart's theory leads to a contradiction4 7,cf4 with what has been said here1 ,sigwart's polemic against my ,psychology1 book ii4 chap4 vii4 in his work2 ,the ,impersonalia1 p4 #ej seq41 and ,logic1 vol4 i4 second edition1 p4 #hi seq4 note1 as well as ,marty's polemic against ,sigwart in the articles3 8ber ,subjectlose ,stze0 in the ,vierteljahrsschrift fr wissenschaftliche ,philosophie1 viii4 i4 seq47,a ,a ,i had already written my ,critique of ,sigwart's notion of existence when ,i became aware of a note in his ,logic1 second ed1 p4 #cij1 a passage which1 while it has not made it necessary to alter anything which ,i had written1 has led me to insert it for the purpose of comparison4 8,das ,seiende berhaupt10 ,sigwart writes1 8kann nicht als wahrer ,gattungsbegriff zu dem einzelnen ,seienden betrachtet werden2 es ist1 begrifflich betrachtet1 nur ein gemeinschaftlicher ,name4 ,denn1 da #8,sein' fr uns ein ,relationsprdikat ist1 kann es kein gemeinschaftliches ,merkmal sein1 es msste denn gezeigt werden1 dass dieses ,prdikat in einer dem ,begriffe alles ,seienden gemeinsamen ,bestimmung wurzle40 ,i fear that the reader will1 just as little as myself1 attain by this explanation to clearness concerning ,sigwart's notion of existence4 ,he will perhaps the better understand why all my efforts regarding it have proved futile4 s ,sigwart has failed to grasp the nature of judgment in general he is not1 of course1 able to understand that of the negative judgment in particular4 ,he has gone so far in error as to deny to it an equal right as species along with the positive judgment2 no negative judgment is1 he thinks1 a direct judgment1 its object is rather always another actual judgment or the attempt to form such a judgment4 ,in this assertion ,sigwart is opposed to some important psychological views which ,i have made good in my lecture4 ,it would therefore seem fitting to resist his attack4 ,for this purpose ,i shall show3 7#a7 that ,sigwart's doctrine is badly founded2 7#b7 that it leads to an irremediable confusion1 as in that case ,sigwart's affirmative judgment is a negative judgment1 while his negative judgment if indeed a judgment at all1 and not rather the absence of one1 is a positive judgment1 and that moreover his positive judgment really involves a negative one1 along with other similar confusions4 7#c7 ,finally ,i think it will be possible--thanks to ,sigwart's detailed explanations--to show the genesis of his error4 #a4 ,the first inquiry in the case of an assertion so novel and so widely diverging from the general view1 will be as to its foundation4 ,with regard to this1 he insists above all 7p4 #aej7 that the negative judgment would have no meaning if the thought of the positive attribution of a predicate had not preceded4 ,but what can this mean8 ,either there is here a clear petitio principii1 or it cannot mean anything more than that a connection of ideas must have preceded4 ,now granting this for a moment 7although ,i have in my ,psychology shown its falsity7 this would by no means prove his proposition1 since ,sigwart himself recognizes 7p4 #hi note1 and elsewhere7 that such a 8subjective connexion of ideas0 would still not be a judgment2 that there needs rather to be added to it a certain feeling of constraint4 ,an argument follows later 7p4 #aea7 the logical connexion of which ,i understand just as little4 ,it is rightly observed that in and for itself we have the right to deny of anything an infinite number of predicates1 and it is with equal right added that in spite of this1 we do not really pass all these negative judgments4 ,and now what conclusion is drawn from these premisses8 ,perhaps this1 that the fact that a certain negative judgment is warranted is not sufficient in itself to explain the entrance of the judgment4 ,this we may without hesitation admit4 ,but ,sigwart concludes quite otherwise2 he permits himself to assert1 it follows from this that the further condition which is here lacking is that the corresponding positive affirmation has not yet been attempted4 ,this is indeed a bold leap1 and one which my logic at least is not able to follow4 ,and why1 if one were to inquire further1 are not all the positive judgments here concerned really attempted8 ,the most probable answer1 judging by the examples given by ,sigwart 7this stone reads1 writes1 sings1 composes2 justice is blue1 green1 heptagonal1 rotating71 is1 that this has not been done because the negative judgment has already been made with evident certainty2 for this would best explain why there is no 8danger of any one attributing these predicates to the stone or to justice40 ,if1 however1 any one prefer to answer that 8the narrowness of consciousness0 makes it impossible to attempt at the same time an infinite number of positive judgments1 ,i am content with this expedient also1 only it must then be asked if this appeal ought not to have been made directly and earlier1 since ,sigwart himself calls the possible negative judgments an 8immeasurable quantity40 ,it is also a curious error 7,marty has already called attention to it71 when ,sigwart asserts that in contradistinction to what holds good of the negative judgment 8every subject admits only of a limited number of predicates being affirmed40 ,but why8 ,can we not1 for example1 say a whole hour is greater than half an hour1 greater than a third1 greater than a fourth and so on ad infin48444 ,if then1 notwithstanding1 ,i do not really make all these judgments1 there are evidently good reasons for this2 above all that the 8narrowness of consciousness0 forbids it4 ,but then this might also be applied most successfully in regard to negative judgments4 ,somewhat later we meet a third argument which1 as ,i have already by anticipation refuted it in my ,psychology 7book ii4 chap4 #g1 section v471 will be treated quite shortly here4 ,if the negative judgment were a direct one1 co-ordinated with the affirmative judgment as species then1 thinks ,sigwart 7p4 #aee seq471 whoever in an affirmative categorical proposition regards the affirmation of the subject as involved must1 to be consistent1 regard the denial of the subject as involved in the negative proposition1 which is not the case4 ,the latter observation is correct1 the former assertion1 however1 quite untenable1 as it involves in itself a contradiction4 ,for exactly because the existence of each part in a whole is involved in the existence of the whole1 the whole no longer exists if but one of its parts is missing4 ,it only remains now to consider a point of language by which ,sigwart believes himself able to support his view4 ,a testimony for it is1 he thinks1 to be found in the fact that the symbol for the negative judgment is formed in every case by means of a combination with the symbol of affirmation1 the word 8not0 being added to the copula4 ,in order to judge what is here actually the fact1 we will glance for a moment at the sphere of feeling4 ,sigwart agrees1 ,i think1 with me and everybody else that pleasing and displeasing1 rejoicing and sorrowing1 loving and hating1 etc41 are co-ordinate with each other4 ,yet a complete series of expressions denoting a disinclination of feeling are found in dependence upon the expression for the corresponding inclination4 ,for example1 inclination1 disinclination2 pleasure1 displeasure2 ease1 disease2 ,wille1 ,widerwille2 froh1 unfroh2 happy1 unhappy2 beautiful1 unbeautiful2 pleasant1 unpleasant2--even 8ungut0 is used4 ,the explanation of this is1 ,i believe1 not difficult for the psychologist1 notwithstanding the equally primordial character of these opposite modes of feeling4 ,ought then the explanation of the phenomenon lying before us in the expression of the negative judgment1 closely related as it is to the before mentioned phenomenon1 to be really so very difficult1 even assuming the primordial character8 ,as a matter of fact the case must be very bad when thinkers like ,sigwart in making statements so important in principle1 and at the same time so unusual1 have to resort to arguments so weak4 #b4 ,the grounds on which ,sigwart's doctrine concerning the negative judgment rest have1 therefore1 each and all proved untenable4 ,this must be so2 for how could the truth of any doctrine be shown which would plunge everything into the greatest confusion8 ,sigwart finds himself compelled to distinguish between the positive and the affirmative judgment1 and the affirmative judgment--one hears and wonders at the new terminology--is according to him1 closely examined1 a negative judgment4 ,on page #aej he says literally3 8,the primordial judgment can certainly not be termed the affirmative judgment1 but is better described as the positive judgment1 for only in opposition to the negative judgment1 and in so far as it rejects the possibility of a negation1 is the simple statement ,a is ,b an affirmation10 and so on4 ,inasmuch as it 8rejects40 ,what else can that mean than 8so far as it denies08 ,as a matter of fact only those negations can1 according to this new and extraordinary use of language1 be called affirmations6 ,yet this would really mean1 and particularly when it is said that the proposition ,a is ,b is often such a negation 7cf4 the expressions just quoted71 that the use of language would be reduced to a confusion quite unnecessary and altogether unendurable4 ,not only is the affirmation--as set forth--according to ,sigwart really a negation but also1 paradoxical as it may seem1 the negation1 on close consideration1 proves to be a positive judgment4 ,it is true1 ,sigwart protests against those who1 like ,hobbes1 would regard all negatives as affirmative judgments with negative predicates4 ,but1 following ,sigwart1 if this is not so1 then these must be affirmative judgments with affirmative predicates1 since he teaches that the subject is in every case a judgment1 the predicate being the notion of invalidity4 ,on p4 #afj he says in the note the negation does away with a supposition1 denies the validity1 and this expression1 considered in itself1 might be taken to mean that ,sigwart assumes here a special function of denial 7absprechen7 the contrary of that of affirmation 7zusprechen74 ,but no2 a negative copula 7cf4 p4 #aec7 according to him there is not4 ,now what in the world is one to understand by 8denial0 7absprechen78 ,does it mean the simple suppression 7,aufhrenlassen7 of the positive judgment upon the given subject matter1 that is1 according to ,sigwart1 the falling away of the feeling of compulsion previously given in a connexion between ideas8 ,this is impossible1 since the removal of this would bring about a condition in which the connexion of ideas remains1 without being either affirmed or denied4 ,how often does something of which we were previously certain become uncertain without our on this account denying it4 ,what then is this denying8 ,may we perhaps say that according to ,sigwart it is a feeling oneself compelled 7sich-gentigt-fhlen7 to annul1 whereas affirming is a feeling oneself compelled to posit8 ,we should then have to say that all the while we are passing a negative judgment1 we are in reality always seeking to pass a positive judgment1 but that we experience a hindrance in so doing4 ,the same consciousness1 however1 is felt by one who is clearly aware of the entire absence of a positive ground4 ,for how can any one succeed in believing anything which he at the same time holds to be entirely ungrounded8 ,of no one1 especially if ,sigwart's definition of the judgment be applied as the standard1 is this conceivable2 that is to say1 every one in such a case will experience failure in such an attempt4 ,accordingly there is1 as yet1 no negative judgment4 ,if then the rejection does not signify a negative copula it must manifestly be regarded as an instance of the affirmation of the predicate 8false10 or 7to use ,sigwart's term7 as its 8identification0 with the judgment which in this case should be the subject4 ,this 8false0 also cannot simply mean 8untrue10 for ,i can assert 8untrue0 of thousands of things with regard to which the predicate 8false10 which appears in certain judgments1 would not be in place4 ,if only judgments are true1 then of everything which is not a judgment the predicate 8untrue0 must be affirmed1 though certainly not on that account the predicate 8false40 8,false0 must therefore be regarded as a positive predicate2 and so from ,sigwart's point of view absolutely false in principle1 certain as it is that the merely not being convinced 7nicht-berzeugt-sein7 is no denial1 it is equally certain that we have actually no choice2 we should be compelled to regard every negative judgment as a positive judgment with a positive predicate4 ,so we arrive at a second and greater paradox4 ,but here a third factor enters which completes the confusion4 ,if we examine ,sigwart's view as to the nature of judgment in general1 it may be shown in the clearest manner possible that the simple positive judgment itself involves in turn1 a negative judgment4 ,that is to say1 following ,sigwart1 every judgment involves besides a certain combination of ideas1 a consciousness of the necessity of our 8identification0 7unseres ,einssetzens7 and the impossibility of its contradictory 7cf4 espec4 p4 #ajb71 the consciousness1 moreover1 of such a necessity and impossibility valid for all thinking beings 7cf4 pp4 #ajb and #ajg71 which1 by the way1 is of course quite as false as ,sigwart's whole view of the nature of judgment in general4 ,all judgments without exception are1 on account of this peculiarity1 called by ,sigwart apodictic3 nor will he admit the validity of any distinction between the assertorical and apodictic forms of judgment 7cf4 p4 #bbi seq474 ,i now ask3 ,have we not here a negative judgment distinctly involved8 ,otherwise what meaning can be given to the statement when we hear ,sigwart speak of a 8consciousness of the impossibility of the contradictory40 ,further ,i have already shown in my ,psychology how all universal judgments are negative1 since to be conscious of universality means nothing else than to be convinced that there exists no exception2 if this negative be not added1 the most extensive list of positive assertions will never constitute a belief in universality4 ,when therefore1 a consciousness that every one must so think is here spoken of1 there is in this fact a further proof of what ,i have asserted1 namely that according to ,sigwart's doctrine of judgment the simplest positive acts of judgment must involve a negative act of judgment4 ,and yet we are called upon at the same time to believe that the negative judgment1 as set forth 7p4 #aei seq471 arose relatively late1 and that therefore on this1 as well as on other grounds1 it is unworthy of being placed side by side1 with the positive judgment as a species equally primordial6 ,sigwart would surely not have expected this of us had he been conscious of all that ,i have here set forth in detail1 and which is the more clearly seen to be involved in his exposition1 often so difficult to comprehend the more carefully it is submitted to reflection4 ,of course expressions may be found where ,sigwart1 respecting this or that point of detail1 asserts the contrary of what is here deduced2 for what else can be expected where everything is left in such ambiguity1 and where the attempt to make things clear exhibits the most manifold contradictions8 #c4 ,finally1 we have still to show the genesis of the error in which this able logician has involved himself in a relatively simple question after having once mistaken the nature of the judgment4 ,the proton pseudos is to be sought in a delusion which has come down to us from the older logic that to the essence of the judgment there belongs the relation of two ideas with one another4 ,aristotle has described this relation as combination and separation 7 7 although he was well aware of the imperfect propriety of the expressions1 adding at the same time that in a certain sense both relations might be described as a combination 71 cf4 de ,anima1 iii4 #f74 ,scholastic and modern logic held fast to the expressions 8combination0 and 8separation02 in grammar1 however1 both these relations were termed 8combination10 and the symbol for this combination the 8copula40 ,sigwart now takes seriously the expressions 8combination0 and 8separation10 and so a negative copula seems to him a contradiction 7cf4 p4 #aec71 the positive judgment1 on the other hand1 appears to be a presupposition of the negative judgment1 since1 before a combination has been set up1 it cannot be separated4 ,and so it appears to him that a negative judgment without a preceding positive judgment is quite meaningless 7cf4 p4 #aej and above74 ,consequently we find this celebrated inquirer in a position which compels him to put forth the most strenuous efforts all to no purpose--the negative judgment remains inexplicable4 ,in a note 7p4 #aei7 he gives us1 as a result of such attempts1 a remarkable description of the process by which we arrive at the negative judgment--a result in which he believes himself finally able to rest satisfied4 ,in this account the false steps which he successively makes become1 each in turn1 evident to the attentive observer4 ,long before the point is reached where he believes himself to have come upon the negative judgment1 he has as a matter of fact already anticipated it4 ,he sets out with the correct observation that the first judgments which we make are all positive in character4 ,these judgments are evident and made with full confidence4 8,now1 however10 he continues1 8our thought goes out beyond the given2 by the aid of recollections and associations1 judgments arise which are at first also formed in the belief that they express reality0 7which means1 according to other expressions of ,sigwart1 that the ideas are combined with the consciousness of objective validity2 for this 7xiv4 p4 #ih7 belongs to the essence of the judgment7 8as1 for example1 when we expect to find something with which we are acquainted in its usual place or pre-suppose respecting a flower that it smells4 ,now1 however1 a part of what is thus supposed contradicts our immediate knowledge40 7,we leave ,sigwart to show here how we are able to recognize anything as 8contradictory0 when we are not as yet in possession of negative judgments and negative notions4 ,the difficulty becomes still more sharply apparent as he proceeds37 8when we do not find what we expected1 we become conscious of the difference between what exists merely in idea and what is real40 7,what does 8not find0 mean here8 ,i had not found it previously2 obviously ,i now find that what was erroneously supposed to be associated with another object is without it1 and this ,i can only do by recognizing the one and denying the other1 i4e4 recognize it as not being with it4 ,further what is meant here by 8difference08 ,to recognize difference means to recognize that of two things the one is not the other4 ,what is meant by existing 8merely in idea08 ,manifestly1 8what exists in idea which is not at the same time also real40 ,it would seem1 however1 that ,sigwart is still unaware that in what he is describing the negative function of the judgment is already more than once involved4 ,he continues37 8,that of which we are immediately certain is another than that0 7i4e4 it is not the same1 it is indeed absolutely incompatible with that7 8which we have judged in anticipation1 and now0 7i4e4 after and since we have already passed all these negative judgments7 8appears the negation which annuls the supposition and denies of it validity4 ,and here a new attitude is involved in so far as the subjective combination is separated from the consciousness of certainty4 ,the subjective combination is compared with one bearing the stamp of certainty1 its distinction therefrom recognized1 and out of this arises the notion of invalidity40 ,this last would almost seem to be a carelessness of expression1 for if invalid were to mean as much as 8false0 and not 8uncertain0 it could not be derived from the distinction between a combination with and a combination without certainty1 but only from the opposition existing between combination which is denied and one which is affirmed4 ,as a matter of fact1 the opposite affirmative judgment is not at all necessary to it4 ,the opposition1 the incompatibility of the qualities in a real1 is already evident on the ground of the combination of ideas representing the opposite qualities which1 as ,i repeat once more1 cannot1 according to ,sigwart himself 7p4 #hi note2 and p4 #ih seq471 be called an attempt at positive judgment4 ,although this may now and again happen in the case of contradictory ideas1 it certainly does not happen always4 ,if1 for example1 the question is put to me3 ,does there exist a regular chiliagon with #ajja sides8 then--assuming that ,i am not perfectly clear in my own mind1 as will be the case with most men1 that there does exist a regular chiliagon1 ,i certainly do not attempt to form a judgment 7i4e4 according to ,sigwart1 confidently assume7 that there exists a regular chiliagon having #ajja sides before forming the negative judgment that no such figure exists on the ground of the opposition between the qualities4 ,sigwart himself1 as his language frequently betrays 7cf4 e4g4 pp4 #aeb and #aej7 recognizes at bottom1 as he is bound to recognize1 in spite of his attack upon the negative copula1 that negation and denial are just as much a special function of the judgment as affirmation and recognition4 ,if this be granted1 then the range of their application is by no means so limited as he erroneously asserts4 ,it is false that in every case where a denial takes place the predicate denied is the notion 8valid40 ,even of a judgment we may deny now its validity1 now its certainty1 now its priori character4 ,and just in the same way the subject of the judgment can change most frequently4 ,of a judgment we may deny certainty1 and validity2 of a request1 modesty2 and so in every case1 universally expressed1 we may deny ,b of ,a4 ,sigwart himself1 of course1 does this just like any one else4 ,indeed he sometimes speaks unintentionally far more correctly than his theory would admit1 and witnesses1 as it were1 instinctively to the truth2 as1 e4g4 p4 #aea1 where he declares not--as he elsewhere teaches--that the subject of a negative proposition is always a judgment1 and its predicate the term 8valid10 but 8that of every subject 444 a countless number of predicates may be denied40 ,this is certainly true and just on this account the old doctrine holds that affirmation and denial are equally primordial species4 #bd 7p4 #ae74 ,the discovery that every act of love is a 8pleasing10 every act of hate a 8displeasing10 was very near to ,descartes when he wrote his valuable little work on ,the ,affections4 ,in the second book1 ,des ,passions1 ii4 art4 #aci1 he says3 8,lorsque les choses qu'elles 7l'amour et la haine7 nous portent aimer sont vritablement bonnes1 et celles qu'elles nous portent har1 sont vritablement mauvaises1 l'amour est incomparablement meilleure que la haine2 elle ne saurait tre trop grande et elle ne manque jamais de produire la joie02 and this agrees with what he says a little later3 8,la haine1 au contraire ne saurait tre si petite qu'elle ne nuise1 et elle n'est jamais sans tristesse40 ,in ordinary life1 however1 the expressions 8joy0 and 8sadness10 8pleasure0 and 8pain0 are only used when the pleasure and displeasure have attained a certain degree of liveliness4 ,a sharp boundary in this unscientific division there is not2 we may1 however1 be allowed to make use of it as it stands4 ,it is enough that the expressions1 8pleasure0 and 8displeasure0 are not narrowed down by any such limit4 #be 7p4 #af74 ,the expressions 8true0 and 8false0 are employed in a manifold sense2 in one sense we employ them in speaking of true and false judgments2 again 7somewhat modifying the meaning71 of objects1 as when we say1 8a true friend10 8false money40 ,i need scarcely observe that where ,i use the expressions 8true0 and 8false0 in this lecture1 ,i associate therewith not the first and proper meaning1 but rather a metaphorical one having reference to objects4 ,true1 is1 therefore1 what is2 false1 what is not4 ,just as ,aristotle spoke of 8 0 so we might also say1 8 40 ,of truth in its proper sense it has often been said that it is the agreement of the judgment with the object 7adequatio rei et intellectus1 as the scholastics said74 ,this expression1 true in a certain sense1 is yet in the highest degree open to misunderstanding1 and has led to serious errors4 ,the agreement is regarded as a kind of identity between something contained in the judgment1 or in the idea lying at the root of the judgment and something situated without the mind4 ,but this cannot be the meaning here2 8to agree0 means here rather as much as 8to be appropriate10 8to be in harmony with10 8suit10 8correspond40 ,it is as though in the sphere of feeling one should say1 the rightness of love and hate consists in the agreement of the feelings with the object4 ,properly understood this also would be unquestionably right2 whoever loves and hates rightly1 has his feelings adequately related to the object1 i4e4 the relation is appropriate1 suitable1 corresponds suitably1 whereas it would be manifestly absurd were one to believe that in a rightly directed love or hate there was found to be an identity between these feelings or the ideas lying at their root on the one hand1 and something lying outside the feelings on the other1 an identity which is absent where the attitude of the feelings is unrightly directed4 ,among other circumstances this misunderstanding has also conduced towards bringing the doctrine of judgment into that sad confusion from which to-day psychology and logic seek with such painful efforts to set themselves free4 ,the conceptions of existence and non-existence are the correlates of the conceptions of the truth of the 7simple7 affirmative and negative judgments4 ,just as to judgment belongs what is judged1 to the affirmative judgment what is judged of affirmatively1 to the negative judgment1 what is judged of negatively1 so to the rightness of the affirmative judgment belongs the existence of what is judged of affirmatively1 to the rightness of the negative judgment the non-existence of what is judged of negatively2 and whether ,i say an affirmative judgment is true1 or1 its object is existent2 whether ,i say a negative judgment is true1 or its object is non-existent2 in both cases ,i am saying one and the same thing4 ,in the same way1 it is essentially one and the same logical principle whether ,i say1 in each case either the 7simple7 affirmative or negative judgment is true1 or1 each is either existent or non-existent4 ,thus1 for example1 the assertion of the truth of the judgment1 8a man is learned10 is the correlate of the assertion of the existence of the object1 8a learned man02 and the assertion of the truth of the judgment1 8no stone is alive10 is the correlate of the assertion of the non-existence of its object1 8a living stone40 ,the correlative assertions are here1 as everywhere1 inseparable4 ,the case is exactly the same as in the assertions ,a ,b and that ,b ,a2 that ,a is the cause of ,b1 and that ,b is produced by ,a4 #bf 7p4 #af74 ,the notion of the good1 in and for itself1 is accordingly a unity in the strict sense1 and not1 as ,aristotle teaches 7in consequence of a confusion which we shall have to speak of later7 a unity in a merely analogous sense4 ,german philosophers also have failed to grasp the unity of the conception4 ,this is the case with ,kant1 and1 quite recently1 with ,windelband4 ,there is a defect in our ordinary way of speaking which may prove very misleading to ,germans inasmuch as for the opposite of the term 8good0 there is no common expression current1 but this is designated now as 8schlimm10 now as 8bel10 now as 8bse10 now as 8arg10 now as 8abscheulich10 now as 8schlecht10 etc4 ,it might very well1 as in similar cases1 come to be thought that not only the common name is wanting1 but also the common notion4 ,and if the notion is wanting on the one side of the antithesis1 it would also be wanting on the other1 and so the expression 8good0 would seem an equivocal term4 ,of all the expressions quoted1 it seems to me 7and philologists also1 whose advice ,i have asked1 are of the same opinion71 that the expression 8schlecht10 like the ,latin 8malum10 is most applicable as the opposite of the good in its full universality1 and in this way ,i shall allow myself to use this expression in what follows4 ,the fact that ,i adhere to the view of a certain common character regarding the intentional relation of love and hate does not debar my recognizing along with this view1 special forms for particular cases4 ,if1 therefore1 8bad0 is a truly universal simple class conception1 there may yet be distinguished special classes within its domain of which one may be suitably termed 8bse10 another 8bel10 etc4 #bg 7p4 #ah74 ,the distinction between 8self-evident0 and 8blind0 judgments is something too striking to have altogether escaped notice4 ,even the sceptical ,hume is very far from denying the distinction4 ,self-evidence1 according to him 7,enq4 concerning ,hum4 ,underst4 iv47 may be ascribed1 on the one hand1 to analytic judgments 7to which class belong also the axioms of mathematics and the mathematical demonstrations71 and1 on the other hand1 to certain impressions1 but not to the so-called truths of experience4 ,reason does not lead us here1 but rather habit1 after a manner entirely irrational2 belief1 in this case is instinctive and mechanical 7ib4 v474 ,but to observe a fact does not mean to set forth its nature clearly and distinctly4 ,as the nature of the judgment has1 until recent times1 been almost universally misunderstood1 how could it be possible rightly to understand its self-evidence8 ,it is just here that even ,descartes' discernment fails him4 ,how very closely the phenomenon occupied him a passage in the ,meditations bears witness3 8,cum hic dico me ita doctum esse a natura 7he is speaking of the so-called external impressions7 intelligo tantum spontaneo quodam impetu me ferri ad hoc credendum non lumine aliquo naturali mihi ostendi esse verum1 quae duo multum discrepant4 ,nam quaecunque lumine naturali mihi ostenduntur 7ut quod ex eo quo dubitem sequatur me esse et similia7 nullo modo dubia esse possunt quia nulla alia facultas esse potest1 cui aeque fidam ac lumini isti1 quaeque illa non vera esse possit docere2 sed quantum ad impetus naturales jam saepe olim judicavi me ab illis in deteriorem partem fuisse impulsum cum de bono eligendo ageretur1 nec video cur iisdem in ulla alia re magis fidam40--7,medit4 iii474 ,that ,descartes did not mark the fact of self-evidence1 that he did not observe the distinction between intuition and blind judgment certainly cannot be affirmed from the above4 ,but1 while separating the judgment as a class from the idea1 he still leaves behind in the class of ideas the character of self-evidence which distinguishes the judgments of intuition4 ,it consists1 according to him1 in a special mark of the perception1 that is1 of the idea lying at the root of the judgment4 ,descartes even goes so far as actually to call this act of perception a 8cognoscere10 a 8knowing40 ,a 8knowing10 that is1 and still not an act of judgment6 ,these are rudimentary organs which after the progress made1 owing to ,descartes1 in the doctrine of judgment1 remind us of a stage of life in ,psychology which has been surmounted2 but with this distinction1 in opposition to similar phenomena in the history of the development of the species1 that these organs1 in no way adapted1 become in the highest degree troublesome1 and render all ,descartes' further efforts for the theory of knowledge ineffective4 ,he remains1 to use ,leibnitz' phrase1 8in the antechamber of truth0 7cf4 here note #bh1 towards the end74 ,only in this way does ,descartes' clara et distincta perceptio--concerning which term itself it is so difficult to gain a clear and distinct idea--in its curious dual nature become perfectly intelligible4 ,the only means of overcoming this confusion is to seek that which distinguishes insight in opposition to other judgments as an inner quality belonging to the act of insight itself4 ,it is true that some who have sought here have yet failed to find4 ,we saw 7cf4 note #bc7 how ,sigwart conceives the nature of the judgment4 ,to this1 he teaches1 there belongs a relation of ideas to one another1 and along with this a feeling of obligation respecting this connexion4 7,cf4 sections #ad and #ca1 espec4 #d and #e47 ,such a feeling therefore1 always exists even in the case of the blindest prejudice4 ,it is then abnormal1 but is held 7as ,sigwart expressly explains7 to be normal and of universal validity4 ,and what now in contrast to this case1 is given in the case of insight8 ,sigwart replies that its evidence consists in the same feeling 7cf4 e4g4 section #c7 which now1 however1 is not merely held to be normal and universally valid1 but is really normal and universally valid4 ,it seems to me that the weakness of this theory is at once apparent2 and it is on many grounds to be rejected4 #a4 ,the peculiar nature of insight1 the clearness and evidence of certain judgments from which their truth is inseparable has little or nothing to do with any feeling of compulsion4 ,it may well happen that at a given moment ,i cannot refrain from so judging1 yet none the less the essence of its clearness does not consist in the feeling of compulsion1 and no consciousness of an obligation so to judge could1 as such1 afford security as to its truth4 ,he who disbelieves in every form of indeterminism in respect of judging1 regards all judgments under the circumstances in which they were passed as necessary1 but he does not--and with indisputable right--regard all of them as on that account true4 #b4 ,sigwart1 in seeking the consciousness of insight in a feeling of necessity so to think1 asserts that the consciousness of one's being compelled is1 at the same time1 a consciousness of a necessity for all thinking beings whenever the same grounds are present4 ,if he means1 however1 that the one conviction is doubtless connected with the other1 this is an error4 ,why1 when a person feels bound to pass a judgment upon certain data1 should the same compulsion hold good in respect of every other thinking being to whom the same data are also given8 ,it is obvious that only an appeal to the law of causality which1 under like conditions demands like results1 could be the ground of the logical connexion4 ,its application1 however1 to the present case would be entirely erroneous1 since this would involve the ignoring of the special psychical dispositions1 which1 although they do not directly enter into consciousness at all1 must yet be regarded1 along with the conscious data1 as pre-determining conditions1 and these are very different in the case of different persons4 ,hegel and his school1 misled by paralogisms1 have denied the principle of contradiction2 ,trendelenburg1 who opposed ,hegel1 has at least restricted its validity 7cf4 his ,abhandlungen ber ,herbarts ,metaphysik74 ,the universal impossibility of inwardly denying the principle which ,aristotle asserted cannot therefore1 to-day1 be any longer defended2 ,aristotle himself1 however1 for whom the principle was self-evident1 assuredly found its denial impossible4 ,whatever is evident to any one is of course certain not only for him1 but also for every one else who1 in the same way1 sees its evidence4 ,the judgment1 moreover1 which is seen to be evident by any one has also universal validity1 i4e4 the contradictory of what is seen to be evident by one person1 cannot be seen to be evident by another person1 and every one who believes in its contradictory is in error4 ,further1 since what is here said belongs to the essence of truth1 whoever has evidence of the truth of anything may perceive that he is justified in regarding it as true for all4 ,but he would be guilty of a flagrant confusion of ideas who should regard such a consciousness that a truth is true for all1 as equivalent to a consciousness of a universal necessity of thinking4 #c4 ,sigwart involves himself in a multitude of contradictions4 ,he asserts and must assert--if he is not to yield to the sceptics and relinquish his entire logical system--that evident judgments are not merely different from non-evident judgments1 but that they are also distinguishable in consciousness4 ,the one class must therefore appear as normal and of universal validity1 the other class as not so4 ,but if evident and non-evident judgments alike carry with them the consciousness of universal validity1 then the two classes would at first sight exactly agree in the manner in which they present themselves1 and only as it were1 afterwards 7or at the same time1 though as a mere concomitant71 and by reflection upon some sort of criterion which is applied to them as a standard could the distinction be discovered4 ,and passages are actually to be found in ,sigwart where he speaks of a consciousness of agreement with the universal rules which accompany the fully evident judgment4 7,cf4 e4g4 ,logic1 #bnd ed41 #ci1 p4 #caa47 ,but apart from the fact that this contradicts experience--for long before the discovery of the syllogism1 conclusions were reached syllogistically and with complete evidence--it is also to be rejected inasmuch as1 seeing that the rule itself must be assured1 it would lead either to an infinite regress1 or to a circulus vitiosus4 #d4 ,another contradiction with which ,i have to charge ,sigwart 7though in my opinion it might have been avoided even after his erroneous view as to the nature of the judgment and as to the nature of self-evidence71 we meet with in his doctrine of self-consciousness4 ,the knowledge that ,i am contains only self-evidence1 and this exists independent of any consciousness of an obligation so to think and of a necessity which is common to all alike4 7,at least ,i am not able otherwise to understand the passage1 ,logic1 #bnd ed41 p4 #caj3 8,the certainty that ,i am and think is the absolutely last and fundamental one--the condition of all thinking and certainty at all2 here1 only immediate evidence can be given2 one cannot even say that this thought is necessary1 since it is previous to all necessity1 and just as immediate and evident is the conscious certainty that ,i think this or that2 it is inextricably interwoven with my self-consciousness2 the one is given with the other407 ,after ,sigwart's doctrine already examined1 this would appear to be a contradictio in adjecto and1 as such1 quite indefensible4 #e4 ,further contradictions appear in ,sigwart's very peculiar and doubtful doctrine concerning the postulates1 which he opposes to the axioms4 ,the latter are to be regarded as certain on the ground of their real intellectual necessity2 the former1 not on the ground of purely intellectual motives1 but on psychological motives of another kind1 on the ground of practical needs4 7,logic1 #bnd ed4 p4 #dab seq47 ,the law of causality3 e4g4 is1 according to him1 not an axiom1 but a mere postulate2 we regard it as certain1 since we find that without affirming it we should not be able to investigate nature4 ,sigwart1 by this mode of accepting the law of causality1 that is1 affirming1 out of mere good-will1 that in nature under like conditions1 the same results would constantly be forthcoming1 manifestly takes it for granted without being conscious of its intellectual necessity4 ,but1 if all 8taking-as-true0 7,frwahrhalten7 is an act of judgment1 this is quite incompatible with his views as to the nature of the judgment4 ,sigwart has here1 as far as ,i can see1 but one way of escape1 i4e4 to confess that he does not believe in what1 as a postulate1 he accepts as certain 7as e4g4 the law of causality72 then1 however1 he will be hardly serious in hoping for it4 #f4 ,this point becomes still more doubtful on reflection upon what 7#b7 has been previously discussed4 ,the consciousness of a universal necessity of thought does not1 according to ,sigwart1 belong to the postulates1 but rather to the axioms4 7,cf4 #e47 ,but ,sigwart could only with any plausibility exhibit the consciousness of this universal necessity of thinking as operating in the consciousness of one's personal necessity of thinking by making use of the universal law of causation4 ,but this causal law is itself merely a postulate2 it is destitute of self-evidence4 ,it is therefore obvious that the universal thought-necessity in the case of the axioms is also a postulate1 and consequently they lose what1 according to ,sigwart1 is their most essential distinction from the postulates4 ,it may perhaps be in accordance with this that ,sigwart calls the belief in the trustworthiness of 8self-evidence0 a postulate4 ,but how the statement so interpreted1 can be brought into harmony with the remaining parts of his doctrine ,i am at a loss to conceive4 #g4 ,sigwart denies 7#ca7 the distinction between assertorical and apodictic judgments1 since in every judgment the sense of necessity in respect of its function is essential4 ,consequently this assertion likewise hangs together with his erroneous fundamental view of the judgment2 he would appear to identify the feeling which he sometimes calls the feeling of evidence with the apodictic character of a judgment4 ,but it would be quite unjustifiable to overlook the modal peculiarity of certain judgments1 as for example1 the law of contradiction in distinction from other forms of judgment like that of the consciousness that ,i am4 ,in the first instance1 we have to do with what is 8necessarily true or false10 in the second instance only with what is 8true or false as a matter of fact10 though both are in the same sense evident and do not differ in respect of their certainty4 ,only in the case of judgments like the former1 not1 however1 from such as the latter do we draw the notions of impossibility and necessity4 ,that ,sigwart1 in opposing the view which regards the apodictic judgment as a special class1 also occasionally bears witness against himself is clear from what has been already said 7#d74 ,the knowledge that ,i am1 he calls1 in opposition to the knowledge of an axiom1 the knowledge of a simple actual truth 7p4 #cab74 ,here he speaks more soundly than his general statements would really allow4 ,sigwart's theory of self-evidence is1 therefore1 essentially false4 ,as in the case of ,descartes1 so here it cannot be said that ,sigwart was not conscious of the phenomenon2 indeed1 we must rather say in his praise1 that with the greatest zeal he has sought to analyze it1 but as is the case with many in psychological analysis1 it would seem that in the eagerness of analyzing he did not stop at the right point1 and has sought to resolve into one another phenomena very distinct in nature4 ,it is obvious that an error respecting the nature of evidence is fraught with the gravest consequence for the logician4 ,it might well be said that we have here touched upon the deep-seated organic disease in ,sigwart's logic1 if this may not rather be said to consist in a misunderstanding of the nature of the judgment in general4 ,again and again its evil results become manifest1 as for example1 in ,sigwart's inability to understand the most essential causes of our errors1 ,cf4 ,logic1 vol4 i4 #bnd ed4 p4 #ajc1 note1 where1 with strange partiality he assigns the chief blame to the defective development of our language4 ,for the rest1 many another celebrated logician in recent times can claim no superiority over ,sigwart here4 ,as a further example we need only observe how the doctrine of evidence fares at the hands of the admirable ,j4 ,s4 ,mill4 ,cf4 note #fi1 p4 #ii4 ,owing to the great unclearness as to the nature of evidence1 almost universal1 it becomes conceivable why1 as often happens1 we meet with the expression 8more or less self-evident40 ,even ,descartes and ,pascal use such expressions1 although it is clearly quite unsuitable4 ,whatever is self-evident is certain1 and certainty in the real sense knows no distinctions of degree4 ,even quite recently we find the opinion expressed in the ,vierteljahrsschrift fr wissenschaftliche ,philosophie 7and the writer is manifestly quite serious71 that there exist self-evident suppositions which1 in spite of their self-evidence1 may quite well be false4 ,it is unnecessary to add that ,i hold this to be opposed to reason4 ,i may here1 however1 express regret that lectures delivered by me at a time when ,i still regarded degrees of conviction as intensities of judgment1 seem to have given an occasion for such confusions4 #bh 7p4 #ai74 ,cf4 ,hume's ,essay1 already cited3 ,an ,enquiry concerning the ,principles of ,morals4 ,other philosophers1 who have placed the foundation of ethics in the feelings1 as e4g4 ,beneke and ,uberweg 7who follows him7 have seen further than ,hume here4 7,cf4 the presentation of ,beneke's ethics in his ,grundriss der ,geschichte der ,philosophie1 iii47 ,herbart comes still nearer to the truth when he speaks of self-evident judgments of taste 7these1 however1 are really not judgments at all1 but feelings1 and as such are not self-evident1 but can only be said to have something analogous to self-evident judgments7 and when he further opposes to the merely pleasurable the beautiful1 ascribing to the latter as distinct from the former1 universal validity and undeniable worth4 ,unfortunately1 there is always something false mixed up with his view1 and ,herbart loses at once and for ever the right path1 so that his ethics in its course diverges much further from the truth than the doctrine of ,hume4 ,those thinkers who have completely overlooked the distinction between pleasure with the character of rightness and pleasure which is not so qualified1 are in danger of falling into opposite errors4 ,the one class view the matter as though all pleasure had the character of rightness1 the other class as though no pleasure were so qualified4 ,by the one class the notion of the good as that which rightly pleases1 is entirely given up2 8worthy of desire0 7begehrenswert7 in distinction from 8desirable0 7begehrbar71 is an unmeaning expression4 ,for the other class1 8worthy of desire0 7begehrenswert7 remains as a separate notion1 so that there is no tautology in their saying nothing is in itself desirable except in so far as it is in itself worthy of desire1 is good in itself4 ,manifestly they must1 to be consistent1 assert this1 and this they have really taught4 ,the extreme hedonists all belong to this class2 but1 along with them1 many others2 in the ,middle ,ages1 for example1 the teaching is found in ,thomas ,aquinas1 whose greatness receives fresh appreciation from ,ihering 7cf4 ,summ4 theol4 ,i4a4 qu4 #hj1 qu4 #hb1 art4 #b ad4 #a1 etc474 ,but even then such a view cannot be maintained in the light of the facts without exposing the nature of good and bad to a falsification which involves a form of subjectivism similar to that formerly committed by ,protagoras respecting the notions of truth and falsehood4 ,just as1 according to this subjectivist in the sphere of the judgment1 man is the measure of all things1 and often what is true for one1 may at the same time be false for another--so the advocates of the view that only the good can be loved1 only the bad hated1 are really compelled to assume that1 in this sphere1 each is himself the measure of all things2 for the good1 in that it is good2 for the bad1 that it is bad2 so that often something is1 in itself and at the same time1 both good and bad3 good in itself1 in the case of all who love it for its own sake2 bad in itself1 in the case of all who hate it for its own sake4 ,this is absurd1 and the subjectivistic falsification of the notion of the good is to be rejected equally with the subjectivistic falsification of the notions of truth and existence by ,protagoras1 but with this difference3 that the subjectivistic error in the sphere of what is rightly pleasing and displeasing takes root more easily and infects most ethical systems even to-day4 ,some1 as recently1 ,sigwart 7,vorfragen der ,ethik1 p4 #f71 confess it openly2 others fall into this error without themselves becoming clearly conscious of the subjectivistic character of their view4,a ,a ,those especially who teach that generally speaking the knowledge1 pleasure1 and perfection of each individual is1 for him1 good1 their opposites bad1 and that all else is in itself indifferent1 will perhaps protest against my classing them among the subjectivists4 ,it might even seem on a superficial survey1 that they have set up a doctrine of the good equally valid for all4 ,but on a more careful examination we find that this teaching does not even in a single instance1 hold one and the same object to be good universally4 ,for example1 my own knowledge is1 according to this view1 for me worthy of love2 for every one else indifferent in itself1 while the knowledge of another individual is in itself for me indifferent4 ,it is curious to observe theistic thinkers1 as often happens1 setting up a subjectivistic view respecting the good1 valid of all mortal loving and willing1 while1 at the same time assuming that ,god1 without respect of person1 estimates every perfection by a kind of objective standard4 ,this exception with regard to the loving and willing of ,god and the notion of ,him as eternal ,judge is then meant to render harmless in respect of its practical consequences1 the egoism which such a principle implies4 elebrated controversy between ,bossuet and ,fenelon it may be said that the great bishop of ,meaux advocated a kind of subjectivism4 ,fenelon's theses1 though he advocated a system of morality neither ignoble nor unchristian1 were finally condemned by the ,church of ,rome1 though it did not go so far as to reject his teaching as heretical4 ,otherwise one would really be compelled to condemn also those fine glowing lines attributed by many to ,st4 ,theresa1 that in a very imperfect ,latin translation have found their way into many ,catholic prayer-books which is much more than their escaping the ecclesiastical censor4 ,i give them translated directly from the ,spanish ,nicht ,hoffnung auf des ,himmels sel'ge ,freuden ,hat ,dir1 mein ,gott1 zum ,dienste mich verbunden4 ,nicht ,furcht1 die ich vor ew'gem ,graus empfunden1 ,hat mich bewegt der ,snder ,pfad zu meiden4 ,du ,herr bewegst mich1 mich bewegt ,dein ,leiden4 ,dein ,anblick in den letzten1 bangen ,stunden4 ,der ,geisseln ,wuth4 ,dein ,haupt von ,dorn umwunden4 ,dein schweres ,kreuz und--ach6--,dein bittres ,scheiden4 ,herr1 ,du bewegest mich mit solchem ,triebe1 ,das ich ,dich liebte1 wr' kein ,himmel offen4 ,dich frchtete1 wenn auch kein ,abgrund schreckte2 ,nichts kannst ,du geben1 was mir ,liebe weckte2 ,denn wrd' ich auch nicht1 wie ich hoffe1 hoffen1 ,ich wrde dennoch lieben1 wie ich liebe40 ,the teaching of ,thomas ,aquinas has often been so represented as though it were pure subjectivism4 ,it is true that much of his teaching sounds quite subjectivistic 7cf4 e4g4 ,summ4 theol4 #a;a4 q4 #hj1 art4 #a1 especially the objections and replies as well as the passages in which he declares that the happiness of each is the highest and final end1 asserting even of the saints in heaven that each rightly desires more his own blessedness than the blessedness of all others74 ,along with these1 however1 are to be found statements in which he soars above this subjectivistic view as1 for example1 when he declares 7as ,plato and ,aristotle before him and ,descartes and ,leibnitz after7 that everything which exists is good as such1 not good merely as a means but also--a point which pure subjectivists 7as recently ,sigwart1 ,vorfr4 d4 ,ethik1 p4 #f7 expressly deny--good in itself1 and again1 when he affirms that in case any one--an impossible case--had at any time to choose between his own eternal ruin and an injury to the ,divine love1 the right course would be to prefer his own eternal unhappiness4 ,there the moral feeling of western ,christendom touches the feeling of the heathen ,hindu1 as is shown in a somewhat strange story of a maiden who renounces her own everlasting blessedness for the salvation of the rest of the world2 as also that of a positivist thinker like ,mill when he declares sooner than bow in prayer before a being not truly good1 8to hell he will go40 ,i knew a ,catholic priest who1 on account of this utterance of ,mill's1 voted for him at the parliamentary election4 ,whoever1 as ,i have said1 has once accepted the view that nothing can please except in so far as it is really good1 nothing displease1 except in so far as it is really bad1 is on a way which1 if consistently followed1 must lead him to subjectivism4 ,this is evident as soon as it is admitted 7and at first sight1 it is true1 it may be denied7 that opposite tastes1 here desire1 there dislike1 may be associated with the same sense phenomenon4 ,one might1 in defence1 argue that here1 in spite of the similarity of the external stimulus the corresponding subjective idea may have an essentially different content4 ,but such a view refutes itself in those cases where we ourselves repeatedly experience the same phenomenon1 and1 in consequence of a further development in age or by reason of a changed habit 7cf4 text #be1 p4 #af7 thereby experience a different feeling1 dislike for desire1 or desire for dislike4 ,there remains1 then1 no doubt1 that as a fact the feelings may take an opposed attitude towards the same phenomenon3 and again1 in the case where ideas instinctively repel us1 while at the same time arousing within us a pleasure of a higher kind 7cf4 note #cb1 p4 #ib71 what has been said is also clearly evident4 ,finally1 we should expect from one who thinks that every act of simple pleasure is right1 and that one act never contradicts another1 a similar doctrine in respect of the act of choosing4 ,but the reverse is here so obvious that the advocates of this view have in striking contrast always asserted in the most definite manner that different individuals have preferences opposite in character1 and that one is right1 the other wrong4 ,glancing back from the disciples of ,aristotle in the ,middle ,ages to the master himself1 we find his teaching appears to be a different one4 ,aristotle recognizes a right and a wrong kind of desire 7 7 and that what is desired 77 is not always the good4 7,de ,anima1 iii4 #aj47 ,in the same way he affirms in respect of pleasure 77 in the ,nicomachian ,ethics that not every pleasure is good2 there is a pleasure in the bad1 which is itself bad 7,nic4 ,eth4 x4 #b74 ,in his ,metaphysics he distinguishes between a lower and a higher kind of desire 7 and 72 whatever is desired by the higher kind for its own sake is truly good 7,metaph4 #g1 p4 #ajgb a4 #bh74 ,a certain approach to the right view seems already to have been reached here4 ,it is of special interest 7a point ,i have only discovered later7 that ,aristotle has suggested an analogy between ethical subjectivism and the logical subjectivism of ,protagoras1 and equally repudiates both 7,metaph4 #f1 p4 #ajfb b4 #af1 and #ajfc a4 #e74 ,on the other hand it would appear from the lines immediately following as though ,aristotle had fallen into the very obvious temptation of believing that we can know the good as good1 independent of the excitation of the emotions4 7,metaph4 #bi2 cf4 ,de ,anima1 iii4 #i and #aj47 ,in close connection with this appears to be the passage 7,nic4 ,eth4 i4 #d7 where he denies that there is any uniform notion of the good 7understanding1 of course1 the good in itself1 cf4 respecting this1 note #bf1 p4 #gg71 thinking rather that only by way of analogy does there exist a unity in the case of the good of rational thinking and seeing1 joy1 etc41 and when1 in another passage 7,metaph4 #d1 p4 #ajbg b4 #be71 he says that the true and the false are not in the things1 where the good and the bad are1 i4e4 the former predicates 7e4g4 true ,god1 false friend7 are ascribed to the things only in respect of certain mental acts1 the true and false judgments1 while the latter1 on the other hand1 are not in a similar way ascribed to them merely in respect of a certain class of mental activities3--all of which1 incorrect as it is1 is still connected as a necessary result with the aforesaid error4 ,he is more in agreement with the true doctrine of the origin of our notion and knowledge of the good1 when 7,nic4 ,ethics1 x4 #b7 he adduces as an argument against the assumption that joy does not belong to the good1 the fact that all desire it1 and adds3 8,for if only irrational beings desired it1 the opposition to this argument would still contain a certain justification2 but if every rational being also does so1 how can anything be said against it80 ,yet even this utterance is reconcilable with his erroneous view4 ,considered in this aspect1 the moralist of sentiment 7,gefhls-moralist71 ,hume1 has here the advantage of him1 for ,hume rightly urges1 how is any one to recognize that anything is to be loved without experiencing the love8 ,i have said that the temptation into which ,aristotle has fallen appears quite conceivable4 ,it arises from the fact that1 along with the experience of an emotion qualified as right there is given at the same time the knowledge that the object itself is good4 ,thus it may easily happen that the relation is then perverted and the love is thought to follow as a consequence of the knowledge1 and recognized as right by reason of its agreement with this its rule4 ,it is not without interest to compare the error here made by ,aristotle in respect of emotion qualified as right with that which we have seen was committed by ,descartes in respect of the similarly qualified judgment 7cf4 note #bg1 p4 #gh74 ,the cases are essentially analogous2 in both cases the distinguishing mark is sought in the special character of the idea which forms the basis of the act rather than in the act itself qualified as right4 ,in fact it seems to me evident from various passages in his treatise ,des ,passions1 that ,descartes himself has treated the matter in a way quite similar to that of ,aristotle1 and in a manner essentially analogous to his doctrine of the self-evident judgment4 ,at the present time many approach very near to ,descartes' error in respect of the marks of self-evidence 7if we are not rather to say that the error is really implicitly contained in their statements7 when they regard the matter as though in the case of every self-evident judgment a criterion were referred to4 ,in this case it must have been previously given somewhere1 either as recognized--and this would lead to infinity--or 7and this is the only alternative71 it is given in the idea4 ,it may be said that here also the temptation to such a misconception lies ready to hand and this may well have exercised a misleading influence upon ,descartes4 ,aristotle's error is less general1 though only because the phenomenon of the emotion qualified as right has1 generally speaking1 come less frequently under consideration than that of the similarly qualified judgment4 ,if the nature of the former has been misunderstood1 the latter has often been so overlooked as not even to admit of its essential nature being misinterpreted4 #bi 7p4 #ai74 ,when ,i affirmed that the language of common life offers no suitable terms for activities of feeling qualified as right1 ,i did not mean thereby to deny that certain expressions are1 in themselves1 well suited1 indeed they would seem to have been created for this purpose1 particularly1 for example1 the expressions 8to be well pleasing10 and 8to be ill pleasing0 7gut gefallen and schlecht gefallen71 as distinct from the simple 8to be pleasing0 and 8to be mis-pleasing40 ,though1 however1 it might seem advisable to limit these terms in this way and so to make them serve as scientific terms1 scarcely any trace of such a limitation is to be found in ordinary language4 ,one does not1 of course1 care to say3 8the good pleases him ill10 8the bad pleases him well10 though one still says that to one this tastes good1 to another that1 and so on1 i4e4 the expression 8to be well pleasing0 is applied unhesitatingly even in the case where pleasure is given in the lowest instinctive form4 ,indeed the term-8impression0 7,wahrnehmung7 has degenerated in an almost similar way4 ,only really appropriate in respect of knowledge1 it came to be applied in the case of the so-called external impression 7ussere ,wahrnehmung71 i4e4 in cases of a belief1 blind1 and in its essential relations1 erroneous1 and consequently would require1 in order1 as a terminus technicus to have scientific application1 an important reform of the usual terminology and one which would essentially narrow the range of the term4 #cj 7p4 #ai74 ,metaph41 #a1 p4 #ihj a4 #bb4 #ca 7p4 #bj7 i4e41 8,als richtig characterisiert40 ,this phrase1 which occurs frequently1 ,i have translated sometimes as above1 sometimes by 8qualified as right40 ,by this phrase and its equivalents is meant that the act 7sc4 of loving1 hating1 or preferring17 is at once perceived by us to be a right one1 bears the mark or character of rightness4 #cb 7p4 #bj74 ,in order to exclude a misunderstanding and the doubts necessarily connected therewith1 ,i add the following remark to what has been suggested shortly in the text4 ,in order that an act of feeling may be called purely good in itself it is requisite3 7#a7 that it be right2 7#b7 that it be an act of pleasing and not an act of displeasing4 ,if either condition be absent1 it is already1 in a certain respect1 bad in itself2 pleasure at the misfortunes of others 7,schadenfreude7 is bad on the first ground2 pain at the sight of injustice1 on the second ground4 ,if both conditions are lacking1 the act is still worse1 in accordance with the principle of summation of which we shall speak later in the lecture4 ,according to this same principle1 where a feeling is good1 its increase increases also the goodness of the act1 while1 similarly1 where an act is purely bad1 or at least participates in any respect in the bad1 with the intensity of the feeling increases the badness of the act4 ,when the act is a mixed one1 good and bad manifestly increase1 or diminish1 in simple proportion to one another4 ,the 8plus0 belonging to the one or the other side1 must therefore1 with the increase in intensity of the act become ever greater1 with its decrease ever smaller4 ,and so the surplus of good in the act may1 under certain circumstances in spite of its impurity1 be described as a very great good1 while conversely1 the surplus of the bad may1 despite the admixture of the good1 be described as something very bad 7cf4 note #cf74 #cc 7p4 #bj74 ,it may happen that1 at the same time1 one and the same thing is both pleasing and displeasing4 ,first1 something in itself displeasing may yet be pleasing as a means to something else1 and vice versa2 then a case may arise where something instinctively repels us1 while at the same time it is loved by us with a higher love4 ,we may thus have an instinctive repugnance to a sensation1 which is yet at the same time 7and every idea1 qua idea1 is good71 a welcome enrichment of our world of ideas4 ,aristotle has said3 8,it happens that desires enter into conflict with each other4 ,this happens when the reason 77 and the lower desires 77 are in opposition 7,de ,anima iii4 #aj74 ,and again3 8,now the lower desires 77 gain a victory over the higher1 now the higher over the lower1 and as0 7according to the ancient astronomy7 8one celestial sphere the other1 so one desire draws off the other with it when the individual has lost the firm rule over himself0 7,de ,anima ii474 #cd 7p4 #ba74 ,just as love and hate may be directed towards single individuals1 so also they may be directed to whole classes4 ,this ,aristotle has already observed4 ,we are1 he thinks1 8not only angry with the individual thief who has robbed us1 and with the individual sycophant who deceives our confiding nature1 but we hate thieves and sycophants in general0 7,rhet4 ii4 #d74 ,acts of loving and hating1 where in this way there is an underlying general conception1 also possess frequently the character of rightness4 ,and so quite naturally along with the experience of this given act of love or hate1 the goodness or badness of the entire class becomes manifest at one stroke1 and apart from every induction from special cases4 ,in this way1 for example1 we attain to the general knowledge that insight as such is good4 ,it is easy to understand how near the temptation lies1 in the case of such knowledge of a general truth without any induction from single cases otherwise demanded in truths of experience1 entirely to overlook the preparatory experience of a feeling having the character of rightness1 and to regard the universal judgment as an immediate synthetic priori form of knowledge4 ,herbart's very remarkable doctrine of a sudden elevation to general ethical principles seems to me to point to the fact that he had observed something of this peculiar process without at the same time becoming quite clear about it4 #ce 7p4 #ba74 ,it is easy to see how important this proposition may become for a theodicy4 ,as regards ethics it might be feared that its security becomes thereby seriously endangered1 perhaps1 indeed1 completely destroyed4 ,to see how unfounded such a fear is1 cf4 note #dc1 p4 #ii4 #cf 7p4 #bb74 ,it seems to me evident even from analysis of the notion of choice 7#a7 that everything which is good is to be preferred1 i4e4 that in an act of choice it shall fall as a reasonable moment into the balance2 7#b7 that everything bad forms a reasonable anti-moment1 and therefore also that 7#c7 in such cases--partly by direct means1 partly by an addition in which the good and the bad are to be taken into account as quantities with opposite signs--the preponderance in which right choice is to be grounded may become evident1 i4e4 the preferability or superiority of the one as opposed to the other4 ,according to this view1 it does not1 closely examined1 require the special experience of an act of preference having the character of rightness1 but only the experience of simple similarly qualified acts of pleasing and displeasing1 in order to attain in the above-mentioned cases to the knowledge of the better4 ,and therefore ,i have said that we derived our knowledge of preferability1 not from the fact that our experience has the character of rightness1 but that the said preferences possess the character of rightness because the knowledge of preferability has here been made the determining standard4 ,i do not1 however1 mean to say that the same distinguishing character which was previously insisted upon in the case of certain simple acts of pleasing is not also here really present4 #cg 7p4 #bd74 ,in order that the procedure here might have been rendered quite exact and really exhaustive1 two other very important cases would still need to have been mentioned in the lecture4 ,the one case is that of pleasure in the bad1 the other that of displeasure in the bad4 ,if we enquire3 ,is pleasure in the bad good8 the answer has already been given in a measure quite rightly by ,aristotle3 ,no4 8,no one10 he says in the ,nicomachian ,ethics 7x4 #b1 p4 #aagd a4 #a71 8would wish to feel joy in what is shameful even if it were made certain to him that no harm would result therefrom40 ,the hedonists1 to which class belonged such noble men as ,fechner 7cf4 his work on ,the ,highest ,good7 contradicted this view4 ,their teaching is to be rejected2 in practice as ,hume has observed1 they fortunately proved much better than in theory4 ,there is still1 however1 a grain of truth in their view4 ,the pleasure in the bad is1 qua pleasure1 good1 and only at the same time bad as a wrong activity of feeling1 and though1 by reason of this perversion1 it may be described as a preponderance of the bad1 it cannot be regarded as something purely bad4 ,while1 therefore1 abhorring it as bad1 we are really making an act of choice in which freedom from what in the object is bad is preferred to the possession of what is good4 ,and when we recognize the aversion as right1 this is possible only because the preference has the character of rightness4 ,the case is similar when we inquire if a similarly qualified displeasure in the bad is good1 as e4g4 where a noble heart feels pain on seeing the innocent oppressed1 or where some one1 looking back upon his past life1 feels remorse at the consciousness of a bad action4 ,here the case is in every respect the reverse of the one preceding4 ,such a feeling arouses a state in which pleasure preponderates1 but this pleasure is not pure2 it cannot be called a pure good like the joy which would have arisen were the opposite of that over which we now mourn a fact1 hence ,descartes' advice 7cf4 #bd1 p4 #ge7--to turn the attention and feeling in an equal degree rather to the good--would really not lose its significance4 ,we recognize all this clearly1 and have therefore1 once more a preference with the character of rightness as the source of our knowledge of what is worthy of preference4 ,in order not to introduce too many complications1 ,i omitted in my lecture when discussing preferences to mention these cases4 ,and this seemed to me the more admissible1 because it would practically lead to the same result1 if 7like ,aristotle in the case of disgraceful pleasure7 one were to treat hate qualified as right on the one hand and love qualified as right on the other1 as phenomena of simple disinclination and inclination4 ,it may be easily seen that from these special cases of a possible determination of a quantitative relation between good and bad pleasure and displeasure1 on the one hand1 and of rightness and unrightness on the other hand 7cf4 for these also ,note #ca1 p4 #ia7 there is no hope of filling in the great gaps referred to in the lecture in a way valid for all cases4 #ch 7p4 #bf74 ,cf4 my ,psych4 from the ,empirical ,standpoint1 book ii4 chap4 iv4 #ci 7p4 #bf74 ,e4 ,dumont4 ,traits de lgislation civile et pnale1 extraits des manuscrits de ,j4 ,bentham2 espec4 in the section bearing the title3 8,principes des lgislation10 chap4 iii4 section #a towards the end2 chap4 vi4 section #b towards the end2 and chaps4 viii4 and ix4 #dj 7p4 #bg74 ,s4 ,rudolph ,wagner4 ,der ,kampf um die ,seele1 vom ,standpunkt der ,wissenschaft4 7,sendschreiben an ,herrn ,leibarzt ,dr4 ,beneke in ,oldenburg47 ,gttingen1 #aheg1 p4 #id note4 8,gauss said1 the author 7of a certain psychological work7 spoke of a want of exact measurements in the case of psychical phenomena1 but it would be good if we only had clumsy ones1 one could then make a beginning2 but we have none4 ,there is here wanting the conditio sine qu non of all mathematical treatment1 i4e4 whether and how far the changing of an intensive into an extensive quantity is possible4 ,yet this is the first and indispensable condition2 then there were also others4 ,on this occasion ,gauss spoke also about the usual incorrect definition of quantity as an #8ens' which is capable of being increased or diminished2 one ought rather to say1 an #8ens' that admits of being divided into equal parts44440 #da 7p4 #bg74 ,fechner's psycho-physical law1 even were it assured1 whereas it awakens continually increasing doubt and opposition1 could only be used as a means of measuring the intensity of the content of certain concrete perceptions1 not1 however1 for measuring the strength of the emotions like joy and sorrow4 ,attempts have been made at determining the measure of feelings by means of the involuntary movements and other externally visible changes accompanying them4 ,to me1 this seems very much as if one were to seek to reckon the exact date of the day of the month by means of the weather4 ,the direct inner consciousness1 however imperfect its testimony may be1 nevertheless offers here far more4 ,at least one draws from the spring itself1 whereas in the other case one has to do with water rendered impure by a variety of influences4 #db 3 7p4 #bg74 ,sigwart1 in his ,vorfragen der ,ethik 7p4 #db71 emphasizes the fact that no more must be required from the human will than what it is able to perform4 ,this utterance1 which coming from the lips of so decided an indeterminist 7cf4 ,logic1 ii4 p4 #eib7 may especially excite surprise1 hangs together with his subjective view of the good1 from which view1 in my opinion1 there is offered no logical1 normal path to the peace of all who possess a good will4 7,cf4 e4g4 the way in which ,sigwart1 p4 #ae1 passes over from egoism to regard for the general good47 ,but similar expressions are also heard from others4 ,and it might really appear doubtful whether the sublime command which bids us to subordinate all our actions to the highest practical good is really the right ethical principle4 ,for1 putting aside cases of want of reflection1 which do not1 of course1 enter here into consideration1 the demand for such complete self-devotion still seems too stringent1 since there is no one1 however carefully he may conduct himself1 who1 looking sincerely into his heart1 will not frequently be compelled to say with ,horace3-- 8,nunc in ,aristippi furtim praecepta relabor1 ,et mihi res1 non me rebus subjungere conor40 ,and yet the doubt is unfounded1 and a comparison may serve to make this clear4 ,it is certain that no one can entirely avoid error2 still1 avoidable or unavoidable1 every error remains a judgment1 which is what it should not be1 and is opposed to the indispensable demands of logic4 ,what applies to logic in respect of weakness of thought applies to ethics on the ground of weakness of will4 ,ethics cannot cease to demand from a man that he should love the acknowledged good and prefer that which is recognized to be better1 not putting anything else before the highest practical good4 ,even were it proved 7which is not the case71 that in a definite class of cases all men without exception in respect of these were never able to remain true to the highest practical good1 this would still not afford the slightest justification for setting aside the fundamental ethical demand4 ,even then it would still remain an evident and unchangeable truth1 the sole and only right rule1 here as everywhere1 to give the preference to the better over what is less good4 ,j4 ,s4 ,mill fears that this would lead to endless self-reproaches and that these constant reproaches would embitter the life of each individual4 ,this1 however1 is so little implied by the rule that it is easily demonstrable that such a result is excluded4 ,goethe well understood this1-- 8,nichts taugt ,ungeduld0 i4e4 impatience in respect of one's own imperfections1 he says in one of his by no means lax sayings1-- 8,noch weniger ,reue10 --giving way to the stings of conscience1 when fresh joyous resolve is alone available1-- 8,jene vermehrt die ,schuld1 ,diese schafft neue40,a ,a 8,impatience naught avails ,nor more availeth rue1 ,one addeth to the fault1 ,the other maketh new40--,tr4 ,in an album ,i once found in the hand of the pious ,abbot ,haneberg1 afterwards ,bishop of ,spires1 the following lines1 written to the same effect3-- 8,sonne dich mit ,lust an ,gottes ,huld1 ,hab' mit allen--auch mit dir1 ,geduld40,b ,b 8,bathe thyself with delight in the sunshine of heavenly grace1 ,let patience toward all men abound--e'en with thyself find a place40--,tr4 #dc 7p4 #bh74 ,it is necessary to be on one's guard against drawing from the principle of love of our neighbour the conclusion that each has to care for every other individual in the same degree as for himself1 which1 far from conducing towards the universal good1 would rather essentially prejudice it4 ,this is seen by reflecting on the circumstance that to ourselves we stand in a position different from that in which we stand to everybody else1 while again in respect of these others we are in a position to help1 or to injure1 one more1 the other less4 ,if there are human beings in ,mars the inhabitants of the earth can and ought to wish them good also1 not however to strive after their good in the same manner as for himself and his fellow-men4 ,it is in this connexion that the injunction to take thought in the first instance for oneself1 a precept to be found in every system of morality1 is justifiable3 8 10 8,sweep before your own doorstep10 etc4 ,the demand to seek first of all the welfare of wife and child1 home and fatherland1 is also universal4 ,the command3 8,take no thought for the morrow10 in the sense in which it really offers wise counsel1 also flows as a result from the same source4 ,that my future happiness ought not to be so dear to me as my present happiness is not here implied4 ,so regarded1 the communistic doctrines which illogical impetuosity would seek to derive from the lofty principle of universal brotherhood are shown to be unjustifiable4 #dd 7p4 #bi74 ,the fact that we are often unable to measure the more remote results of our actions offers a more serious difficulty4 ,but even this thought will not discourage us if we love the universal good4 ,it may be said of all results which are unrecognizable in an exactly equal degree1 that one has just as many chances in its favour as the others4 ,according to the law of great numbers a compensation will on the whole result1 and so whatever calculable good we create will stand as a plus on the one side and1 just as though it stood alone1 will justify our choice4 ,from the same point of view1 as ,i have already suggested in the lecture 7p4 #bb71 the doubt is removed which in a similar manner might arise through uncertainty as to whether everything that is good draws from us a love having the qualification of rightness1 and whether1 therefore1 we are able to recognize it as good and to take due account of it4 #de 7p4 #bi74 ,that in the case of the limits of right 7,rechtsgrenzen7 we have essentially to do with spheres which lie at the disposal of the individual will has been frequently emphasized both by philosophers 7cf4 in this respect e4g4 ,herbart's ,idea of ,right7 and by able jurists4 ,ihering in his ,geist des rmischen ,rechts1 iii4 #a 7p4 #cbj note71 demonstrates this with numerous citations4 ,arndt e4g4 in his ,handbuch der ,pandekten defines law as 8supremacy of the will regarding an object02 for ,sintenis it is1 8the will of one person raised to the universal will40 ,windscheid defines it as 8a certain volition 7,willensinhalt7 of which the legal code in a concrete case affirms that it may be made valid as against every other will40 ,puchta1 who has perhaps expressed the thought in the most manifold ways1 says in his digest of ,roman law1 section #bb1 8as the subjects of such a will thought of potentially men are called persons1 444 personality is therefore the subjective possibility of the legalized will1 of a legal power40 ,in the same work 7section #aah1 note b7 he observes in regard to a want of personality3 8,the principle of modern law is inability to dispose of property02 many other of his expressions convey the same meaning4 ,as however these legal authorities have concentrated their attention exclusively upon legal duties1 and do not touch upon the problem as to the way in which the individual will has to rule in its legal sphere1 ,ihering has interpreted them as meaning that they considered the true and highest good1 and the most intrinsic and final end1 towards which the legal code strives1 to be the exercise of the will as will1 the joy of the individual in his volitional activity2 8the final end of all law is1 for them1 willing0 7pp4 #cbj1 #cbe72 8the end of law 7according to them7 consists once for all in the power of the will1 in its supremacy0 7p4 #cbf74 ,one can well understand how he comes to condemn a theory so interpreted 7p4 #cbg71 and even that he succeeds in making it appear ridiculous4 8,according to this view10 he says1 7p4 #cbj7 8all private right is nothing less than an arena in which the will moves and exercises itself2 the will is the organ by which the individual enjoys his right1 the profit obtained from legal right consists in feeling the joy and glory of power1 in the satisfaction of having realized an act of will1 e4g4 of having effected a mortgage1 transferred a title1 and so proved oneself to be a legal personality4 ,what a poor thing would the will be if the bare and low regions of law were the proper 8sphere of its activity60 ,certainly the heaviest charges of absurdity and ridiculousness would be well deserved if those scholars who regard the immediate aim of law as consisting in a limitation of the spheres at the disposal of the will had intended in so doing to disavow all regard for the final ethical end1 i4e4 the advancement of the highest practical good4 ,there is1 however1 absolutely nothing to justify this insinuation1 and therefore one could perhaps with more right smile at the zeal of an attack which is really levelled merely against windmills4 ,moreover1 what ,ihering proposes to set in its place is certainly a bad substitute4 ,for1 in regarding the sphere ascribed by the legal authority to the individual simply as a sphere consigned to their egoism 7a view which1 as the author of ,der ,zweck im ,recht1 he perhaps no longer holds71 he is thus led to his definition3 8,law 7,recht7 is legal security for enjoyment10 whereas he would have been more correct in saying3 8,law is legal security for the undisturbed disposal of individual power in the advancement of the highest good40 ,is then injustice something which exhausts bad conduct8 ,by no means2 legal duties have limits2 duty in general governs all our actions1 and this our popular religion expressly emphasizes1 as1 for instance1 when it asserts that for every idle word the individual must render an account4 ,besides this first objection1 which rests upon a simple misunderstanding of the intention1 ,ihering has also raised several others which are essentially due to imperfections in the use of language4 ,if the legal code essentially consists in setting certain limits to the activity of the individual will in order that one person may not disturb the other in striving after the good1 it follows that he who has1 or had1 or will have no will has also no legal sphere4 ,i say1 8has1 or had1 or will have10 for obviously regard must be paid to the past and to the future4 ,a dead man often exercises an influence extending into the far distant future1 so that ,comte well says3 the living are more and more dominated by the dead4 ,in like manner1 the situation will entail that1 in respect of many problems1 we leave the decision to the future1 i4e4 renounce the sovereignty in favour of a future will4 ,this consideration resolves many a paradox urged by ,ihering 7pp4 #cbj-cbe72 not however1 all4 ,in the case of one who from birth has been an incurable imbecile1 it is obvious that no power of will whatever can be found1 to which regard for the highest practical good might allow a sphere2 there remains therefore to him1 according to our view1 really no legal sphere1 and yet on every hand we hear of a right which he possesses in his own life2 even under some circumstances1 we refer to him as the owner of a great estate1 or ascribe to him the right of a crown or kingly rule4 ,on examining the relations closely1 we find that we are never concerned here with a true legal sphere respecting a subject incapable of being held responsible1 but rather with the legal spheres of other individuals1 as1 for example1 that of a father who1 in providing for his imbecile child1 gives instructions in his will concerning his property1 the dominion of whose will is safeguarded after his death by the law of the land2 or 7as1 for example1 the case where the imbecile's life is held to be sacred71 quite apart from the injury done to the simple duty of affection which this would involve1 there is also in question the ,state's legal sphere1 which permits no one else to commit a fatal attack1 and accordingly often imposes a punishment1 even in the case of an attempt at suicide4 ,a third objection of ,ihering's1 i4e4 that by a limitation of rights as affecting spheres of will1 even the most senseless dispositions of will must be allowed legal validity 7p4 #cbe71 this offers1 after what has been said1 hardly any further difficulty4 ,certainly many a foolish disposition of will must be allowed4 ,were the ,state not to admit this1 then it alone would possess a definitive right of disposal2 all private right would be at an end4 ,so long as not merely subjects1 but also governments1 are liable to commit acts of foolishness1 such an extension of the power of the ,state cannot be recommended4 ,for the rest1 just as secondary ethical rules in general suffer exceptions1 and in particular expropriations in the case of private owners are frequently necessary1 so also it is clear and to be admitted without contradiction1 that senseless dispositions or dispositions which have evidently lost all meaning and reference to the highest practical good can be annulled by the ,state4 ,regard for the highest practical good is here1 as is the case of every other so-called collision of duties1 decisive4 #df 7p4 #bi74 ,that a law1 which in and for itself is bad and contrary to nature1 however condemnable from an ethical point of view1 and its modification urgently necessary1 may yet in many cases receive a provisional sanction from the reason1 this has long been recognized and made clear1 as e4g4 by ,bentham in his ,traits de ,lgislation civ4 et pn4 ,in antiquity ,socrates1 who deemed himself worthy to be feasted in the ,prytaneum1 died for the sake of this conviction4 ,the positive legal code1 despite all its defects1 creates a condition of things which is better than anarchy1 and since each act of insubordination to the law threatens to injure its force in general1 so in those circumstances brought about by the law itself1 it may be that provisionally and for the individual a mode of action even from the rational standpoint is right1 which1 apart from this1 would be in no way justifiable4 ,all this results without doubt from the relativity of the secondary ethical rules1 which will be treated later4 ,it may be added that errors respecting the laws of positive morality 7a point shortly to be discussed in the lecture7 in a similar way demand1 under certain circumstances1 to be taken into account4 ,it dare not1 on the other hand1 be overlooked that there are here limits1 and that the saying3 8,we ought to obey ,god rather than man10 may not1 in its free and sublime range1 be allowed to suffer injury4 #dg 7p4 #bi74 ,heraclitus of ,ephesus 7,b4,c4 #ejj71 the oldest of the ,greek philosophers1 of whose philosophy we possess rather extensive fragments4 #dh 7p4 #ca74 ,ihering1 ,der ,zweck im ,recht1 vol4 ii4 p4 #aai1 and other passages4 #di 7p4 #ca74 ,politics1 vol4 i4 chap4 #e4 #ej 7p4 #ca74 ,nic4 ,ethics1 v4 #ad1 p4 #aacg b4 #ac4 ,politics1 iii4 and iv4 #ea 7p4 #ca74 ,cf4 ,discours prliminaire to the ,traits de ,lgislation1 also the section 8,de l'influence des temps et des lieux en matire de lgislation0 of that work4 #eb 7p4 #ca74 ,philos4 ,versuch ber die ,wahrscheinlichkeiten von ,laplace1 translated from the sixth edition of the original text by ,n4 ,schwaiger1 ,leipzig1 #ahhf1 p4 #ic seq4 7,application of the calculation of probabilities to moral science47 #ec 7p4 #cb74 ,cf4 ,allg4 ,juristenzeitung1 vii4 p4 #aga2 ,zweck im ,recht1 vol4 ii4 p4 #aah2 #abb seq4 #ed 7p4 #cc74 ,grundlegung zur ,physik der ,sitten4 ,cf4 above note #ad1 p4 #di4 #ee 7p4 #cd74 ,cf4 e4g4 the ,meno dialogue4 #ef 7p4 #cd74 ,friedr4 ,alb4 ,lange1 ,logische ,studien1 ein ,beitrag zur ,neubegrndung der formalen ,logik und der ,erkenntnislehre4 ,iserlohn1 #ahgg4 #eg 7p4 #cd74 ,alex4 ,bain1 ,logic1 pt4 #a4 ,deduction4 ,london1 #ahgj1 p4 #aei seq4 #eh 7p4 #ce74 e4g4 ,bentham1 also1 in antiquity1 ,epicurus4 #ei 7p4 #ce74 e4g4 ,plato and ,aristotle1 and following them ,thomas ,aquinas4 #fj 7p4 #ce74 ,the ,stoics1 and in the ,middle ,ages1 the followers of ,scotus4 #fa 7p4 #cf74 ,this even ,epicurus did not deny 7little in harmony as it is with his utterance quoted p4 #ed74 #fb 7p4 #cf74 ,nic4 ,ethics1 ,i4 i4 #fc 7p4 #cf74 ,metaph4 #aj4 #fd 7p4 #cf74 ,metaph4 #aj4 #fe 7p4 #cf74 ,they made the relation to the greater whole serve as an argument in favour of the view that the practical life 7of the politician7 stands higher than that of the theorist4 #ff 7p4 #cf74 ,this testimony to the principle of summation likewise reappears as often as in a theory based upon egoistic and utilitarian grounds1 the notion of ,god is employed in the construction of ethics 7e4g4 ,locke2 ,fechner in his work on the highest good2 cf4 also for ,leibnitz1 ,trendelenburg1 ,histor4 ,beitrge1 vol4 ii4 p4 #bde74 ,god1 so runs their argument1 loves each of ,his creatures1 and therefore their totality more than the single individual2 ,he therefore approves and rewards the sacrifice of the individual to the whole1 while disapproving and punishing self-seeking injury4 ,in the desire after immortality also1 the influence of the principle of summation is manifest4 ,thus ,helmholtz1 7ber die ,entstehung des ,planetensystems1 lecture delivered at ,heidelberg and ,cologne1 #ahga71 in seeking to offer a hopeful prospect to those who cherish this desire1 says3 8,the individual 7if that which we achieve can ennoble the lives of those who succeed us7 may face fearlessly the thought that the thread of his own consciousness will one day be broken4 ,but to the thought of a final annihilation of the race of living mortals1 and with them1 the fruits of the striving of all past generations1 even men of minds so unfettered and great as ,lessing and ,david ,strauss could scarcely reconcile themselves40 ,when it is scientifically shown that the earth will one day be incapable of supporting living beings1 then1 he thinks1 the need of immortality will irresistibly return1 and we shall feel bound to cast about for something which will afford us the possibility of assuming it4 #fg 7p4 #cd74 ,metaph4 #aj4 #fh 7p4 #cg74 ,this is the standing doctrine of the great theologians1 as e4g4 ,thomas ,aquinas in his ,summa ,theologica4 ,only certain nominalists1 like ,robert ,holcot1 teach the complete arbitrariness of the divine commands4 ,cf4 my essay on the ,geschichte der kirchlichen ,wissenschaften im ,mittelalter1 in ,mhler's ,church ,history 7published by ,gams1 #ahfg7 vol4 ii4 #ebf seq41 respecting which1 however1 the reader is asked not to overlook the revision of the printer's errors in the 8errata10 p4 #ajc seq41 at the end of that work4 #fi 7p4 #ci74 ,at a time when psychology was far less advanced and inquiries into the province of the calculation of probability had not brought sufficient clearness into the process of rational induction1 it was possible even for a ,hume to fall a victim to this gross confusion4 ,cf4 his ,enq4 concern4 ,hum4 ,underst41 chaps4 v4 and vi4 ,more striking is it that ,james ,mill and ,herbert ,spencer have still not advanced in the slightest degree beyond ,hume2 7,cf4 ,anal4 of the ,phen4 of the ,hum4 ,mind1 vol4 ii4 chap4 ix4 and note #ajh71 and that even the acute thinker1 ,j4 ,s4 ,mill1 although ,laplace's ,essai ,philosophique sur les ,probabilits lay at his disposal1 never arrived at a clear distinction of the essential difference between these two forms of procedure4 ,this hangs together with his failure to appreciate the purely analytic character of mathematics and the import of the deductive procedure in general4 ,indeed he has absolutely denied that the syllogism leads to new knowledge4 ,whoever bases the whole of mathematics upon induction cannot possibly justify mathematically the inductive procedure4 ,it would be for him a circulus vitiosus4 ,it is here beyond question that ,jevon's ,logic takes a truer view4 ,even in the case of ,mill1 it sometimes appears as if an inkling of the immense difference had begun to dawn upon him1 as when1 in a note to his ,analysis of the ,phenomena of the ,human ,mind 7vol4 i41 chap4 xi4 p4 #djg71 in criticizing his father's theory1 he says3 8,if belief is only an inseparable association1 belief is a matter of habit and accident and not of reason4 ,assuredly an association1 however close1 between two ideas is not a sufficient ground 7the italics are his own7 of belief2 it is not evidence that the corresponding facts are united in external nature4 ,the theory seems to annihilate all distinction between the belief of the wise1 which is regulated by evidence and conforms to the real successions and co-existences of the facts of the universe1 and the belief of fools which is mechanically produced by any accidental association that suggests the idea of a succession or co-existence to the mind2 a belief aptly characterized by the popular expression1 believing a thing because they have taken it into their heads40 ,this is all excellent4 ,but it is robbed of its most essential worth1 when1 in a later note 7vol4 i4 p4 #dch4 note #aaj7 we hear ,j4 ,s4 ,mill say3 8,it must be conceded to him 7the author of the ,analysis7 that an association sufficiently strong to exclude all ideas that would exclude itself1 produces a kind of mechanical belief1 and that the processes by which the belief is corrected1 or reduced to rational bounds1 all consist in the growth of a counter-association tending to raise the idea of a disappointment of the first expectation1 and as the one or the other prevails in the particular case1 the belief or expectation exists or does not exist exactly as if the belief were the same thing with the association10 and so on4 ,there is much here that calls for criticism4 ,when ideas are mentioned which mutually exclude one another it may well be asked what kind of ideas these are8 ,according to another utterance of ,mill's 7vol4 i4 p4 #ih seq4 note #cj and elsewhere71 he knows 8no case of absolute incompatibility of thought except between the thought of the presence of something and that of its absence40 ,but are even these incompatible8 ,mill himself teaches elsewhere the very opposite when he thinks that along with the idea of existence there is always given at the same time the idea of non-existence 7p4 #abf1 note #ci2 8we are only conscious10 he says1 8of the presence of an object by comparison with its absence074 ,apart1 however1 from all this1 how strange is it that ,mill here overlooks the fact that he abandons entirely the distinctive character of self-evidence1 and retains only that blind and mechanical formation of judgment1 which he rightly treats with contempt4 ,the sceptic ,hume stands in this respect far higher1 since he at least sees that such an empirical 7empiristisch7 view of the process of induction does not satisfy the requirements of our reason4 ,sigwart's criticism of ,mill's theory of ,induction 7,logic1 vol4 ii4 p4 #cga7 contains here much that is true1 though in appealing to his postulates he has certainly not substituted anything truly satisfactory in the place of what is defective in ,mill4 #gj 7p4 #dj74 ,cf4 ,hume1 ,enquiry concerning ,human ,understanding1 vol4 ii4 towards the end4 #ga 7p4 #dj74 ,nic4 ,ethics1 iii4 #aj4 ,cf4 the subtle discussions in the subsequent chapter on the five kinds of false courage4 #gb 7p4 #da74 ,nic4 ,ethics1 i4 #b4 ,,appendix ,i ,i 8,subjectless propositions0 so the celebrated philologer has entitled a little work which1 on its first appearance1 bore the title1 ,the ,verba ,impersonalia in the ,slav ,languages4 ,the change of name may well be connected with considerable additions in the second edition4 ,the new designation would1 however1 even in the earlier form1 have been the more suitable title4 ,for1 far from treating the special nature of merely one family of languages1 the author sets up a theory of wide-reaching significance1 which1 while contradicting the prevailing view1 only deserves all the more on this account general attention4 ,not only philology1 but also psychology and metaphysics have an interest in the problem4 ,moreover1 the new doctrine promised to bring profit not only to the inquirer in these lofty spheres but also to the schoolboy at present tortured by the school-master with impossible and incomprehensible theories 7cf4 p4 #bc seq474 ,such an influence1 however1 the treatise has not exercised4 ,the earlier views still hold unbroken sway even to-day1 and although the appearance of the monograph in a new edition bears testimony to a certain interest in wider circles1 this is manifestly not due to the circumstance that the work was believed to have thrown light upon old doubts and errors4 ,darwin's epoch-making work1 quite apart from the truth of its hypothesis1 had1 even for its opponents1 an indisputable worth2 the wealth of important observations and ingenious combinations every one had to acknowledge with admiration4 ,so also in the case of ,miklosich1 who has compressed into a few pages a rich store of learning and interspersed the most subtle observations4 ,many who have withheld their assent to his principal thesis may still feel indebted to him for many points of detail4 ,here1 however1 we wish chiefly to consider the main problem and1 very briefly1 to make ourselves clear respecting that with which it really deals4 ,it is an old assertion of logic that the judgment consists essentially in a binding or separating1 in a relation of ideas to one another4 ,this view1 almost unanimously maintained for two thousand years1 has exercised an influence upon other disciplines4 ,and so we find grammarians from very early times teaching that no more simple form of expression in the case of the judgment exists1 or can exist1 than the categorical1 which combines a subject with a predicate4 ,that the carrying out of this doctrine brings with it difficulties could not1 of course1 be permanently concealed4 ,propositions like3 it rains1 it lightens1 appear as though they had no wish to conform to this view4 ,yet none the less the majority of inquirers were so firmly convinced1 that in such cases they felt compelled1 not so much to doubt the universal validity of their theory as rather to search for the subjects1 which in their view were only apparently missing4 ,many really believed themselves to be in possession of the same4 ,now1 however1 in marked contrast to the unity which had hitherto prevailed1 they branched off in the most varied directions4 ,and if we examine somewhat closely and in detail the various attempts at an explanation1 we shall easily be able to understand1 why none of these were able to give permanent satisfaction1 or even for a time to bring about unanimity4 ,science explains by reason of its comprehending a multiplicity as a unity4 ,here also1 of course1 every effort has been made to accomplish this1 but every attempt has proved futile4 ,when we say3 it rains1 many have supposed that the unnamed subject denoted by the indefinite 8it0 is 8,zeus03 ,zeus rains4 ,but when we say3 8es rauscht10 it is obvious that ,zeus cannot be the subject4 ,others again have thought that the subject is here 8das ,rauschen02 consequently the meaning of the proposition would be3 8das ,rauschen rauscht40 ,the previous example they also completed in the same manner3 8,raining1 7or the rain7 rains40 ,when1 however1 we now say3 8es fehlt an ,geld10 the meaning must therefore be3 8das ,fehlen an ,geld fehlt an ,geld40 ,but this is absurd4 ,it was therefore explained that the subject here is 8,geld10 and the meaning of the proposition is3 8,geld fehlt an ,geld40 ,closely examined1 this would seem to strike a blow at the wished-for unity of explanation4 ,if1 however1 by closing one eye1 the failure here may be partially ignored1 even this is useless when we stumble upon propositions like3 8es giebt einen ,gott10 respecting which we arrive at no satisfactory meaning either in the proposition3 8das einen ,gott geben giebt einen ,gott2 das ,geben giebt einen ,gott10 or in the proposition1 8,gott giebt einen ,gott40 ,it was therefore necessary to look for an explanation of an entirely different character4 ,but where was such an explanation to be found8 ,and even if ingenuity were here able to hit upon some expedient1 what availed such leaping from case to case1 which could only be called the caricature of a truly scientific explanation8 ,not a single designation of the subject which has been so far suggested1 can be termed suitable1 unless indeed it be a saying of ,schleiermacher's4 ,for if this philosopher 7cf4 p4 #af7 has really asserted that the subject in such cases is chaos1 this utterance must be regarded1 not so much as an attempt at explanation as rather a satire upon the hypotheses hitherto set up by philologists4 ,many inquirers are therefore of opinion that the real subjects of such propositions as3 it rains1 it lightens1 have1 up to the present time1 not been discovered1 and that even at the present time it is the business of science to find them4 ,but1 would it not be strange if the tracing of a subject1 which is thought of by everyone1 and which1 though unexpressed1 forms the basis of the judgment1 should yet offer such extraordinary difficulties8 ,steinthal seeks to explain this by saying that by the grammatical subject something is suggested1 which is yet unthinkable4 ,but many will reply with ,miklosich 7p4 #bc73 8,we would not1 ,i think1 be going too far in asserting that grammar is not concerned with the unthinkable40 ,the totality of the phenomena and the absolutely grotesque failure of every attempt to determine the nature of the subject1 however often and however ingeniously this has been attempted1 are the chief grounds on which ,miklosich bases his assertion that1 generally speaking1 the supposed subject in the case of such propositions is a delusion1 that the proposition is no combination of subject and predicate1 that1 as ,miklosich expresses it1 the proposition is subjectless4 ,further reflections go to confirm this view1 and among these one consideration as to the nature of the judgment requires to be emphasized on account of its special importance4 ,miklosich combats those who1 like ,steinthal1 deny that there is any reciprocal relation between grammar and logic1 at the same time repelling the attacks which1 on the ground of such a reciprocal relation1 might be made against his doctrine by psychologists and logicians4 ,indeed he arrives at the result that1 in consequence of the special peculiarity of certain judgments1 subjectless propositions must from the very first be expected in language4 ,according to his view it is wrong to suppose that every judgment is a relation existing between ideas4 ,it often happens that in a proposition only one fact is affirmed or denied4 ,in such cases a mode of expression is also necessary1 and it is obvious that this cannot well consist in a combination of subject and predicate4 ,miklosich shows how philosophers have been repeatedly led to this knowledge1 though1 as a rule1 they have not appreciated sufficiently the significance of their discovery4 ,not sufficiently clear themselves as to the new truth to which they gave expression1 and1 at the same time1 clinging with strange indecision to certain residues of the older view1 it came about that what at first they affirmed they at last essentially deny4 ,thus ,trendelenburg chose to find expressed in the proposition1 8it lightens10 in the last resort1 no real judgment1 but only the rudiments of a judgment which precedes the notion of lightning and settles down into it1 thereby forming the basis for the complete judgment1 8lightning is conducted by iron40 ,herbart finally declared such judgments as 8es rauscht10 to be no judgments in the ordinary sense1 not1 he thought1 what in logic is1 strictly speaking1 termed a judgment4 ,the passage in which our author censures the inconsistency of these philosophers1 and shows that the source of their confusion lies in their misunderstanding of the nature of judgment and in their erroneous definition of it 7p4 #ba seq471 is excellent4 ,from all this ,miklosich draws the conclusion that his subjectless propositions are completely assured4 ,and not only does he consider their existence beyond doubt1 he further shows that their appearance is by no means so rare as might be supposed from the controversy into which it has been necessary to enter concerning them4 ,their great variety had led him1 in the second part of his treatise 7pp4 #cc-gb7 to set forth their chief classes1 and there we find subjectless propositions with the ,active ,verb1 the ,reflexive ,verb1 the ,passive ,verb and the verb 8to be10 each of these four classes being illustrated by means of numerous examples from the most various languages4 ,this is especially the case with the first class1 where he makes an eightfold division with the object of grouping the propositions according to the difference in their content4 ,he mentions as universally true 7p4 #f7 that the finite verb of the subjectless propositions always stands in the third person singular1 and1 where the form admits a difference of gender1 in the neuter4 ,in other directions also he traces the matter further4 ,he shows how these propositions did not arise later than those which predicate something of a subject1 but appear from the very outset among the various forms of propositions 7p4 #ac seq41 p4 #ai71 and how1 in the course of time1 they have disappeared from several languages 7p4 #bf74 ,he proves that the languages in which they are preserved enjoy an advantage1 inasmuch as their application lends to the language a special liveliness 7#bf71 and he shows how in other respects also it is not always possible to substitute for the subjectless proposition the categorical form1 with which it is supposed to be identical4 8,ich friere0 is1 for instance1 not fully identical with 8mich friert40 ,instead of1 was frierst du draussen8 ,komme doch herein6 we cannot say3 was friert dich's draussen8 etc4 8,mich friert0 cannot be applied if ,i expose myself voluntarily to the cold 7p4 #cg74 ,,ii ,this1 shortly1 is the substance of his book1 regarding which ,i venture to make a few critical observations4 ,i have sufficiently expressed in this summary1 my approval of the treatise in general1 especially in respect of the main argument4 ,the proofs appear to me to be of so cogent a nature1 that even the unwilling will scarcely be able to escape from the truth4 ,quite independent of these arguments1 however1 ,i had myself1 long ago1 arrived at the same view1 by way of a purely psychological analysis1 and gave1 in the most decisive manner1 public expression to it1 when in #ahgd ,i published my ,psychology4 ,great1 however1 as were the pains ,i then took to set the teaching in a clear light and to show every former view untenable1 my success so far has been slight4 ,apart from isolated individuals1 ,i have been just as little able to convince the philosopher1 as ,miklosich1 in his first edition1 was able to convince philologists4 ,where a prejudice has1 during centuries1 become ever more and more firmly rooted1 where a doctrine has penetrated even to the primary school1 when a theory has come to be regarded as fundamental upon which much else rests1 and so1 as it were1 by its weight rendered the foundation immovable1 in such a case1 it is not to be expected that the error will immediately disappear as soon as its refutation is established2 on the contrary1 it is to be feared that distrust of the new view will be so great1 as not even to admit of a closer examination being made regarding the grounds on which it rests4 ,and yet when two investigators completely independent of each other agree in their testimony1 when by quite different paths they arrive at the same goal1 it may be hoped that this concurrence will not be regarded as a mere coincidence1 but that a more careful attention will be bestowed upon the arguments on either side4 ,i hope that this will be so in the case of the new edition of ,miklosich1 in which ,i am glad to see regard paid to my own work4 ,the agreement with regard to the main points makes subordinate points1 in respect of which we differ1 of less moment4 ,i shall1 notwithstanding1 briefly touch on these4 ,miklosich has termed those simple propositions1 in which there is contained no combination of subject and predicate1 and in the recognition of which ,i am in agreement with him1 8subjectless propositions40 ,i am not able entirely to approve his use of the term and the grounds which he has given for its use4 ,subject and predicate are correlative conceptions and stand or fall together4 ,a proposition which is truly without a subject must with equal right be regarded as without a predicate4 ,it does not therefore seem to me quite fitting that ,miklosich should always term such propositions subjectless1 and it is quite incorrect when he calls them mere predicative propositions4 7,cf4 pp4 #c1 #be1 #bf1 and elsewhere47 ,this might suggest the view that he likewise believes a second conception 7the subject7 is understood though not expressed1 had he not in the most decided manner denied this 7p4 #c seq4 and elsewhere72 or that he regarded such propositions as stunted forms of categorical propositions1 and the latter form as the original1 had he not expressly refuted this also 7p4 #ac seq474 ,his view rather seems to be1 that the natural development from the simple to the categorical form in thinking and speaking is generally accomplished in such a way that the notion which stands alone in the former proposition is combined with a second as subject4 8,the subjectless propositions10 he says1 p4 #be1 8are propositions which consist only of a predicate1 of what1 in the natural process of thought-formation must1 in a great number of propositions1 be regarded as the prius1 for which a subject may1 but not necessarily must be sought40 ,but this also can hardly be right1 and the expression 8subject0 scarcely seems to favour this view4 ,that which forms the basis is1 of course1 certainly that which in the construction of the judgment stands first4 ,the temporal succession of the words also agrees ill with such a view1 since1 in the categorical proposition1 we usually begin with the subject4 ,in opposition to such a view it may also be contended that the emphasis usually falls upon the predicate 7and ,trendelenburg has made use of this to indicate that the predicate is the main conception1 and even with exaggeration goes on to say3 8,we think in predicates10 cf4 p4 #ai74 ,if the predicative conception is what is newly added1 it will1 accordingly1 be the object of greater interest4 ,on the other hand1 we would be compelled to expect exactly the opposite if the notion of the subject contained the newly added moment4 ,it may just as truly be said1 8a bird is black10 as1 8something black is a bird02 8,socrates is a man10 as1 8a man is ,socrates02 but ,aristotle has already observed that only the former predication is natural1 the latter form is opposed to the natural order4 ,and this is really so far true1 that we naturally make that term the subject to which we first pay regard in forming a judgment1 or to which the hearer must first attend in order to understand the proposition1 or to gain knowledge as to its truth or falsity4 ,we can be assured of the existence of a black bird by seeking it among birds or among black objects1 more easily1 however1 among the former4 ,in the same way we may be more easily assured that an individual belongs to a particular species or genus by analysing its nature than by running over the entire range of the corresponding general notion4 ,the cases of exceptions clearly confirm the rule and the grounds on which it rests1 as1 for instance1 when ,i say3 8,there is something black2 this something black is a bird10 in which case it is just because ,i have first recognized the colour that ,i accordingly make it the subject in the categorical proposition so formed4 ,of the two categorical ,sorites1 the ,aristotelian and the ,goclenian1 the former in every succeeding link makes that term the subject which is common to it and to the one preceding1 the latter form makes it the predicate4 ,it is just on this account that the former appears the more natural1 and as such is generally regarded as the regular1 the latter as the reversed form4 ,in like manner where1 to a proposition not consisting of a combination of ideas1 we add a categorical proposition having one term in common with the former1 we usually apply this not as a predicate but as a subject1 and we should therefore prefer to say that a predicate has been sought for a subject rather than that a subject has been sought for a predicate4 ,for example3 es rauscht2 das ,rauschen kommt von einem ,bache 7there is a sound of running water2 the sound comes from the brook74 ,es donnert2 der ,donner verkndet ein nahendes ,gewitter 7it thunders2 the thunder heralds an approaching storm74 ,es riecht nach ,rosen2 dieser ,rosengeruch kommt aus dem ,nachbargarten 7there is a smell of roses2 the rose-scent comes from a neighbour's garden74 ,es wird gelacht2 das ,gelchter gilt dem ,hanswurste 7there is laughter2 the laughter is due to the clown74 ,es fehlt an ,geld2 dieser ,geldmangel ist die ,ursache der ,stockung der ,geschfte 7there is a lack of money2 this dearth of money is the cause of the depression in trade74 ,es giebt einen ,gott2 dieser ,gott ist der ,schpfer des ,himmels und der ,erde 7there is a ,god2 this ,god is the maker of heaven and earth71 etc41 etc4 ,only in one sense1 therefore1 does the term 8subjectless proposition0 appear to me justifiable1 and even perhaps deserving of recommendation1 in so far as regard is paid to the fact1 that the notion which is contained thereby is the only1 and therefore1 of course1 the main conception2 a preference which in the categorical proposition belongs1 as we have seen1 to the predicate4 ,similarly also in respect of categorical in relation to hypothetical propositions we would much rather say that they are propositions without an antecedent1 than propositions without a consequent proposition2 not as though we meant that where there is no antecedent there may still be a consequent proposition1 but that in the hypothetical construction the consequent is the main proposition4 ,in this way then ,i might perhaps agree with the author respecting the term 8subjectless proposition40 ,another point1 however1 in which ,i am unable fully to agree with him is the question as to what extent subjectless propositions are applicable4 ,miklosich rightly emphasizes the fact that the limits are on no account to be drawn too tightly4 ,but he thinks such limits at any rate exist1 and this is just what is shown most clearly in his attempt to classify and divide the varied nature of the matter capable of being expressed by subjectless sentences4 ,but this appears to me incorrect4 ,the applicability of the subjectless form may1 strictly speaking1 be rather regarded as unlimited1 since--as ,i believe ,i have already shown in my ,psychology--every judgment1 whether expressed in categorical1 hypothetical or disjunctive form admits1 without the slightest alteration in the sense1 of being expressed in the form of a subjectless proposition or1 as ,i expressed it1 of an existential proposition4 ,thus the proposition1 8,a man is ill10 is synonymous with 8,there is a sick man02 and the proposition1 8,all men are mortal10 with the proposition1 8,there is no immortal man10 and the like4,a ,a ,supplementary note4 ,what is here said of the general applicability of the existential form holds good only with the one manifest limitation1 in respect of judgments which are really completely simple4 ,in expressing such judgment logic has always made use of the categorical form2 in common life they are often applied as the expression of a plurality of judgments based upon each other4 ,this is clearly the case in the proposition1 8this is a man40 ,in the demonstrative 8this0 the belief in existence is already included2 a second judgment then ascribes to him the predicate 8man40 ,similar cases are frequent elsewhere4 ,in my opinion it was the original purpose of the categorical form to serve as a means of expressing such double judgments 7,doppelurteile71 which recognize something while affirming or denying something else of it4 ,i also believe that the existential and impersonal forms have1 by a change in function1 proceeded from this form4 ,this does not alter its essential nature3 a lung is not a swim-bladder 7,fisch-blase7 even though it has developed therefrom1 and the word 8kraft0 is none the less a merely syncategorematic word 7,cf4 ,mill1 ,logic1 i4 #b1 #b71 even though its origin may be traced to a substantive4 ,in yet another direction ,miklosich appears to me to have limited too narrowly the applicability of his subjectless propositions4 ,we have heard that such propositions constitute 8an excellence in a language10 8respecting which all languages are very far from being able to boast0 7p4 #bf74 ,this1 however1 appears scarcely credible if it be true1 as in another passage he has so convincingly shown1 that there are and always have been judgments which do not consist in any combination of two ideas with each other1 and which therefore it is impossible to express by means of a connexion of a subject with a predicate 7p4 #af74 ,from this must follow1 not merely1 as ,miklosich affirms1 the necessary existence of subjectless propositions generally1 but further 7which he denies7 the existence of such propositions in all languages4 ,that the author has here fallen into error seems to me partly explicable from the fact that in order to proceed with the utmost caution and lay claim to no unwarrantable example1 he has not ventured to regard certain propositions as subjectless1 which1 in truth1 really are so4 ,we saw that ,miklosich expressed the view that the finite verb of subjectless propositions always stands in the third person of the singular1 and1 when the form admits a difference of gender1 in the neuter4 ,this was certainly too narrow a limit1 a limit which he himself transgresses1 though this appears in a much later passage4 ,in the second part of his treatise he says3 8,in #8es ist ein ,gott1' the notion #8,gott' is affirmed absolutely without a subject1 and this is also the case in the proposition #8es sind ,gtter'02 and he adds3 ,the 8ist0 of the existential proposition takes the place of the so-called copula 8ist10 which in many1 though by no means in all1 languages1 is indispensable to the expression of the judgment1 and has the same significance as the termination of person in the finite verb as is clearly shown in the proposition 8es ist ,sommer1 es ist ,nacht0 alongside the propositions1 8es sommert1 es nachtet40 8,ist0 is accordingly not a predicate 7p4 #cd2 cf4 also p4 #ba above74 ,as a matter of fact1 if the proposition1 8es giebt einen ,gott10 is to be considered subjectless1 so also must the proposition1 8es ist ein ,gott10 and therefore also1 8es sind ,gtter02 and thus the rule previously laid down has proved to be too narrow4 ,that the existential propositions and other analogous forms1 which may be found1 are all to be reckoned as subjectless propositions may serve to confirm what we have sought to show above1 i4e4 that no language exists1 or can exist1 which entirely dispenses with these simplest forms of propositions4 ,only certain special kinds of subjectless propositions therefore1 am ,i able1 with ,miklosich1 to recognize as the peculiar advantage of certain languages4 ,these are the criticisms which ,i have thought it necessary to make4 ,it will be seen that1 if found to be justified1 they do not in the slightest degree prejudice either the correctness or the value of the author's main argument1 but rather lend to it a still wider significance4 ,and so ,i conclude by expressing once again the wish that this suggestive little work1 which1 on its first appearance did not meet with sufficient general recognition1 may in its second edition--where individual points have been corrected1 much extended1 and particularly the critical objections of scholars like ,benfey1 ,steinthal and others1 refuted with a laconic brevity1 yet rare dialectical power--find that interest which the importance of the inquiry and its excellent treatment deserve4 ,,appendix ,,ii ,franz ,brentano1 son of ,christian ,brentano1 and nephew of ,clemens ,brentano and ,bettina von ,arnim1 was born on ,january #af1 #ahch1 at ,marienberg1 near ,boppard on the ,rhine4 ,he early embraced the study of philosophy and theology1 both at ,berlin1 under ,trendelenburg1 and also at ,munich4 ,in #ahfd he was ordained priest1 and two years later became privat docent in the ,university of ,wrzburg4 ,in #ahgc he was appointed professor there1 but in the same year resigned his office in consequence of his changed attitude towards the ,church1 and as an opponent of the ,vatican ,council4 ,somewhat later1 in response to this change in his convictions1 he separated himself definitely from the ,church4 ,in #ahgd ,brentano received a call to the ,university of ,vienna1 and continued there teaching ,philosophy until #ahie1 first as ordinary professor1 and afterwards1 having meantime renounced his professorship1 as privat docent4 ,the reasons which led him to retire from this post also1 are set forth in his work1 ,my ,last ,wishes for ,austria 7,stuttgart1 #ahie74 ,after withdrawing from his post as teacher he took up his residence at ,florence4 ,brentano regards ,aristotle as his real teacher in philosophy1 and his two earliest publications1 ,von der mannigfachen ,bedeutung des ,seienden nach ,aristoteles 7,freiburg1 i4 ,br4 #ahfb71 and ,die ,psychologie des ,aristoteles insbesondere seine ,lehre vom 7,mainz1 #ahfg71 are a testimony to his comprehensive study and thorough knowledge of ,aristotelian philosophy4 ,especially is he in agreement with the ,stagirite regarding the high position he would assign to the application of the empirical method as the only one which1 in regard alike to scientific and philosophical problems1 is able by cautious and gradual advance1 to attain to knowledge4 ,these first principles of method1 especially in their relation to psychological research1 he has set forth and practised in his first systematic work1 ,psychologie vom ,empirischen ,standpunkte 7vol4 i41 ,leipzig1 #ahgd74 ,it was also his regard for this method of inquiry which early imbued him with a special interest for the works of the most eminent ,english philosophers of modern times1 not only ,john ,locke and ,david ,hume1 but also ,bentham1 the two ,mills1 ,jevons and others4 ,a study of these writers led ,brentano to enter at length in his ,wrzburg lectures into a critical and explanatory treatment of ,english psychology and logic1 characterizing it as a source of instruction and inspiration at a time when other distinguished advocates of ,german philosophy looked askance at this attitude towards ,english thought1 believing that by its contact with ,english writers the peculiar character of ,german thought might suffer4 ,it will be observed that only the first volume of the ,psychology from the ,empirical ,standpoint has hitherto appeared1 and it seems hardly likely that the work in its present form will be continued1 for further reflection convinced ,brentano that descriptive,a psychology1 or ,psychognosy1 as of most importance in the examination and presentation of psychological problems1 must be separated from genetic psychology1,b a study necessarily half physiological in character2 and that the former problem as the naturally earlier and least difficult study should first be as far as possible completed4 ,a i4e4 the closest possible description and analysis of psychical events and their contents1 on the basis of inner observation4 ,b i4e4 the more difficult inquiry into the laws underlying the origin of phenomena4 ,such psychognostical inquiries1 although not yet in principle separated from genetic inquiry1 occupy by far the greater part of the first volume of the ,psychology from the ,empirical ,standpoint4 ,among the subjects there treated are3 #a1 the fundamental revision of the classification of psychical phenomena1 and their division into the three main classes3 ideas1 judgments1 and phenomena of love and hate2 #b1 and in particular1 a new and more appropriate characterization of the judgment4 ,the insufficiency of the old doctrine according to which judgment consists essentially in a connexion of ideas1 had already been shown by ,hume1 and more recently was strongly emphasized by ,mill1 though neither was able to arrive at perfect clearness respecting its real nature4 ,notwithstanding this1 the affinity of ,brentano's doctrine of the judgment with that of ,mill1 led to a scientific correspondence1 and later to arrangements for a personal interview1 when1 at the last moment1 the plan was frustrated by the death of the great ,english investigator4 ,the new description of the judgment and its essential qualities form the basis for a reform of logic even in its most elementary stages1 a reform which1 in its essential features1 is suggested in the above-mentioned work1 and also touched upon in the ,essay here translated2 but this truer description of the phenomenon of judgment also throws light upon the description and classification of the modes of speech from the point of view of their function or meaning1--a classification based upon true and most essential distinctions4 ,in comparison with phonetics this branch is still little developed4 ,what is here said1 was seen by eminent philologists like ,fr4 von ,miklosich1 the pioneer in the sphere of ,slav comparative philology4 ,in the appendix will be found an article bearing upon this view4 ,while engaged in a profound study of the descriptive peculiarities connected with the third fundamental class of psychical states above referred to--a study analogous to that previously undertaken by him with regard to the judgment--,brentano was led to the discovery of the principles of ethical knowledge which form the subject of this lecture4 ,the author1 in his lectures delivered before students of all faculties1 but especially to students in the faculty of law1 during each winter session throughout many years1 presented a complete and fully developed system of ethical teaching based upon these principles4,a ,unfortunately1 this lecture still remains unpublished4 ,the same holds good of many of his inquiries into 8descriptive psychology10 or psychognosie1 e4g4 inquiries into the nature of sense perceptions according to their qualitative and spatial nature1 the nature of the continuum1 the time phenomenon1 etc41 the results of which are hitherto familiar only to those who have either attended his lectures1 or have been present during private conversations4 ,a ,since this essay was written the statements as to the principles here developed have been modified only in respect of two points which1 if not practically important1 are still theoretically so1 and these1 with the author's permission1 may be here shortly referred to3-- #a4 ,in the lecture 7p4 #ae7 it is said that anything may be either affirmed or denied1 and that if the affirmation is right its denial must be considered wrong1 and vice vers4 ,it is also stated that this is true analogously in respect of love and hate4 ,this ,brentano no longer asserts1 but rather observes that whereas the whole must be denied1 if but a part is untrue1 a sum of good and bad1 on the other hand1 may be of such a nature as nevertheless as a whole to be worthy of love4 ,it may be also so constituted that good and bad remain in equilibrium4 #b4 ,in the lecture 7p4 #bd71 and in the corresponding note #cg 7p4 #hg71 it is said that our preference qualified as right in the case where1 for instance1 to one good another is added1 is drawn1 not from our knowledge of the preferability of the sum as opposed to the parts1 but that analytic judgments here yield the means of our advance in knowledge1 and that the corresponding preferences are therefore qualified as right1 since the knowledge 7given analytically7 is here the criterion4 ,here it is overlooked that without the experience of acts of preferring we neither have nor could have the conception1 and therefore also our notion of preferability4 ,and so it is also true that it is by no means evident from analysis that one good plus another is preferable to each of these goods taken singly4 ,here also a complete analogy to the sphere of the true is wanting4 ,one truth added to another does not yield something more true4 ,on the other hand1 one good plus another good yields a better4 ,but that this is so can only be understood by means of a special experience belonging peculiarly to this sphere1 i4e4 by means of the experience of acts of preferring which are qualified as right4 ,as to the other branches of philosophy1 the work of ,brentano already published forms but a portion--often but the smaller portion--of investigations1 which1 in the manner above described1 have become known to a larger or smaller circle of disciples4 ,this explains the striking fact that1 in proportion to the extent of what has been published1 an unusually large number of investigators and scholars appear in a greater or lesser degree to have been influenced by ,brentano4 7berweg-,heinze1 in the eighth edition of the ,grundriss der ,geschichte der ,philosophie1 reckons1 as belonging to his school1 six names of men at present occupying important positions as teachers of philosophy47 ,one section of ,brentano's doctrine of sense-perception forms the substance of a lecture1 ,zur ,lehre von der ,empfindung1 delivered at the ,third ,international ,psychological ,congress held in ,munich 7#ahif71 and published in the report of its proceedings 7#ahig74 ,a fragment of the above system of ethical inquiry1 ber das ,schlechte als ,gegenstand dichterischer ,darstellung 7,leipzig1 #ahib71 treats of the worth and preferability of the ideas employed by the artist4 ,with regard to psycho-genetic problems1 apart from the question as to the meaning and validity of ,fechner's psycho-physical law1 a question discussed in the first volume of his ,psychology and elsewhere1 and that of the spirituality and immortality of the soul1 which formed repeatedly the substance of lectures at ,vienna ,university1 ,brentano has especially occupied himself with the laws of the association of ideas4 ,one result of this study is his lecture1 ,das ,genie1 published in #ahib1 which seeks to explain the artistic productions of men of genius--often regarded as something quite unique and inexplicable--as a development of psychical events which universally control our imaginative life4 ,of ,brentano's researches in metaphysics and in the theory of knowledge it must also be said that hitherto they remain still unpublished1 though they are familiar to a greater or smaller circle of disciples4 ,in this latter sphere are to be mentioned particularly his inquiries respecting the nature of our insight into the law of causality1 the logical justification of induction1 the a priori nature of mathematics1 and the nature of analytic judgments4 ,in ontological questions also psychognosie has proved fruitful to the investigator in leading him to an understanding and to an analysis based upon experience1 of the most important metaphysical notions1 as1 for instance1 causality1 substance1 necessity1 impossibility1 etc41 notions which some1 despairing of the task rightly insisted upon by ,hume1 of showing their origin to be based upon perception and experience1 have sought to explain straight away as a priori categories4 ,for the rest1 ,brentano1 in regard to metaphysics1 is a decided theist4 ,he is an adherent of the theory of evolution1 while denying that accidental variations and natural selection in the struggle for existence render explicable the phenomena of evolution and the teleological character of the organism1 basing his objections1 among other things1 upon the fact that this attempt at a solution not only leaves unexplained the first beginnings of an organism1 but also takes too little account of the fact that with the increasing perfection and complication of the organism it becomes more and more improbable that an accidental variation will lead to an improvement upon that which already exists4 ,and yet if there is to be progress1 the organisms which1 in the struggle for existence1 survive must not only be more perfect than those which perish1 but also more perfect than the organisms through which they themselves are descended4 ,brentano's views on the historical development of philosophical inquiry and the causes determining that development1 the present state of philosophy and its views regarding the future1 he has set forth in various publications3 ,die ,geschichte der ,philosophie im ,mittelalter 7,mhler's ,kirchengeschichte1 vol4 ii4 #ahfh72 ber die ,grnde der ,entmutigung auf philosophischem ,gebiete 7,vienna1 #ahgd71 delivered as an inaugural address on entering upon his work at ,vienna ,university2 ,was fr ein ,philosoph manchmal ,epoche macht 7,vienna1 #ahgf72 ber die ,zukunft der ,philosophie 7,vienna1 #ahic72 and ,die vier ,phasen der ,philosophie und ihr augenblicklicher ,stand 7,stuttgart1 #ahie74 ,in the last work a concise survey is made of the entire course of the ,history of ,philosophy1 and it is there shown how in the three periods1 rightly regarded as distinct 7,greek ,philosophy1 the ,philosophy of the ,middle ,ages1 and ,modern ,philosophy71 there is each time an analogous change1 a rising or blossoming period1 and three periods of decadence1 of which those which succeed are always the psychologically necessary result of the preceding4 ,that in so doing ,brentano has characterized the latest phase of ,german philosophy1 the so-called idealistic direction from ,kant to ,hegel as the third or mystic period of decadence 7howbeit with all due recognition of the talents of these writers7 has naturally aroused violent opposition1 though it has not found any real refutation4 ,it has been already said that ,brentano's earliest efforts were directed to historical inquiries and especially to a presentation of the ,aristotelian psychology and to important sections of his ,metaphysics4 ,the results of these researches1 diverging as they did in many respects from the traditional view1 did not fail to awaken the attention of other investigators4 ,their attitude1 however 7with a few exceptions like ,trendelenburg1 and in part also ,grote71 was1 on the whole1 hostile and polemic4 ,this was especially so in the case of ,e4 ,zeller1 in the later edition of his ,greek ,philosophy1 and in view of the reputation which this work enjoys1 ,brentano thought it necessary to offer1 as against ,zeller's attacks1 at least with regard to one point1 an apology for his own view1 a point where the threads of metaphysics and psychology become most intimately related1 and where at the same time1 the contrast between the opposing views of these two writers in the psychological and metaphysical spheres alike culminate4 ,and so there appeared in the ,report of the ,proceedings of the ,imperial ,academy of ,sciences in ,vienna 7#ahhb7 ,brentano's article3 8ber den ,creatianismus des ,aristoteles1 in regard to which ,e4 ,zeller in the same year1 in the ,report of the ,proceedings of the ,royal ,prussian ,academy of ,sciences in ,berlin1 7vol4 #di71 published a detailed reply under the title3 8ber die ,lehre des ,aristoteles von der ,ewigkeit des ,geistes40 ,the charge which is there made by ,zeller against ,brentano of interpreting ,aristotle without sufficient confirmation and with over-confidence1 ,brentano has sufficiently repelled in his ,offener ,brief an ,herrn ,prof4 ,dr4 ,e4 ,zeller 7,leipzig1 #ahhc71 and the proofs which are here offered of the way in which ,zeller1 on his part1 bases his own attempts at explanation and his charges against ,brentano show distinctly that1 if here one of the two opponents is really open to the charge of over-confidence1 it is at any rate not ,brentano4 99 99 99 99 99 ,dante and ,giovanni del ,vergilio ,by ,,philip ,h4 ,,wicksteed1 ,m4,a41 and ,,edmund ,g4 ,,gardner1 ,m4,a4 ,demy #hvo4 #abs4 ,the ,mind of ,tennyson ,,his ,,thoughts ,,on ,,god1 ,,freedom1 ,,and ,,immortality ,by ,e4 ,,hershey ,,sneath1 ,,ph4,d4 ,professor of ,philosophy in ,yale ,university4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 net4 ,third ,edition4 8,admirably sums up for us ,tennyson's philosophic ideas and the creed he had ultimately arrived at4 ,since ,mr4 ,stopford ,brooke's comprehensive survey of ,tennyson1 nothing so excellent has been written on the poet's ideas40--,spectator4 ,the ,teachings of ,dante ,by ,,charles ,,allen ,,dinsmore ,with ,frontispiece4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 net4 8,the author of this delightful volume takes his reader1 as it were1 behind the scenes and shows him of the inner life and thought of the master4444 ,mr4 ,dinsmore has a grip of the religious teaching of ,dante which few men have attained1 and the whole volume is wondrously suggestive of the deep truths that underlie the marvellous imagery of the poet40--,the ,rock4 ,the ,chronicle of ,villani ,translated by ,,rose ,e4 ,,selfe4 ,edited by ,rev4 ,p4 ,h4 ,,wicksteed ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 8,perhaps no one book is so important to the student of ,dante as the chronicle of his contemporary ,villani40--,athenum4 ,tiberius the ,tyrant ,by ,j4 ,c4 ,,tarver1 ,author of 8,gustave ,flaubert10 etc4 ,with a ,portrait4 ,demy #hvo4 #aes4 net4 8,mr4 ,tarver has drawn a lifelike portrait1 amid a group of others vigorous1 real1 and living2 especially the women40--,cambridge ,review4 8,not for a long time has a historical volume so deeply interested me as ,mr4 ,tarver's #8,tiberius the ,tyrant1' which has the dramatic movement of a romance at the same time that it lights up and gives life to a story worth telling4444 ,his style has the transcendent virtue of clearness1 and he happily selects the modern analogies by which he illustrates the conditions and the problems of the age of which he treats4 ,the comparison of ancient with modern conditions gives the work a second interest as a criticism of contemporary ideas and movements4444 ,the author is to be congratulated on a volume which will attract many readers to a subject that is just now exceptionally worthy of attention40--,mr4 ,,spenser ,,wilkinson in the ,morning ,post4 99 99 99 99 99 ,maximilian ,i41 ,holy ,roman ,emperor 7,stanhope ,prize ,essay47 ,by ,r4 ,w4 ,,seton ,,watson ,illustrated4 #es4 net4 8,a sound and well-considered piece of historical criticism40--,daily ,news4 8,a notable essay40--,morning ,post4 ,by ,g4 ,s4 ,,street1 ,author of 8,the ,trials of the ,bantocks10 8,the ,autobiography of a ,boy10 8,a ,book of ,stories10 etc4 ,crown #hvo4 ,cloth ,gilt4 #fs4 ,a volume of essays divided under three headings3 7#a7 ,london2 7#b7 ,books and ,men2 7#c7 ,various4 ,studies in the ,lives of the ,saints ,by ,,edward ,,hutton1 ,author of 8,frederic ,uvedale40 ,fcap4 #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 net4 ,ephemera ,critica ,,plain ,,truths ,,about ,,current ,,literature ,by ,,john ,,churton ,,collins ,second ,edition4 ,crown #hvo4 #gs4 #f;d4 8,a book of uncommon interest and importance4 ,a collection of essays united in a common aim1 and inspired by a genuine enthusiasm for literature2 it has something to say and says it without fear or favour40--,literature4 ,chalmers on ,charity ,a ,selection of ,passages and ,scenes to illustrate the ,social ,teaching and ,practical ,work of ,,thomas ,,chalmers1 ,d4,d4 ,arranged and ,edited by ,n4 ,,masterman1 ,m4,a4 ,eighteen years ,member of the ,london ,charity ,organization ,society1 and some time ,guardian in the ,parish of ,kensington4 #dad pp4 ,price #gs4 #f;d4 net4 ,with a ,frontispiece4 8,we should advise such of our readers as care to know the arguments against public poor relief to look at a book which has just been published by ,mr4 ,n4 ,masterman4444 ,he has succeeded in making the unpopular side of a dry subject keenly interesting40--,spectator4 ,human ,immortality ,by ,,william ,,james1 ,professor of ,philosophy at ,harvard ,university4 ,fourth ,edition4 #afmo4 #bs4 #f;d4 8,professor ,james is well known as one of the most suggestive and original writers1 and as certainly the most brilliant psychologist living4 ,whatever1 therefore1 he has to say on this subject is worth listening to2 for he thinks freely1 and he knows all that the scientist knows1 and more too40--,spectator4 99 99 99 99 99 ,a ,,catalogue ,,of ,,books ,,published ,,by ,archibald ,constable ,co ,ltd #b ,,whitehall ,,gardens ,,westminster ,,page ,,history1 ,,biography1 ,,and ,,criticism #c ,,travel #ad ,,sport #ag ,,naval ,,and ,,military #ah ,,fine ,,art #bj ,,educational ,,and ,,technical #bb ,,religious #ca ,,fiction #cc ,,poetry #db ,,books ,,for ,,the ,,young #dg ,,index #di ,,books ,,arranged ,,in ,,order ,,of ,,prices #ec 99 99 99 99 99 ,,the ,,ancestor ,a ,quarterly ,review of ,county and ,family ,history1 ,heraldry and ,antiquities ,,edited ,,by ,,oswald ,,barron1 ,f4,s4,a4 ,large ,super ,royal1 in paper boards with numerous ,illustrations #es4 net ,quarterly 8,thoroughly original in scope and style1 the publishers are to be congratulated on its effective appearance4 ,the ,ancestor intends to apply the spirit of a new and conscientious criticism to the revived interest in genealogy and family history40--,,the ,,athen,,um4 8,such a new departure is certainly designed to fill a want which has long been felt1 and the names of its contributors guarantee the accuracy and importance of its contents40--,,the ,,times4 8,printed in old-faced type1 and neatly bound in studious-looking boards1 the new periodical makes a very handsome appearance4 ,the pages of ,the ,ancestor are brightened by portraits1 illustrations of old armorial glass1 and so on4 ,it is edited carefully and with knowledge1 and should command popularity among the large number of readers to whom it appeals40--,,the ,,standard4 8,clearly printed on good paper1 and freely and excellently illustrated4 ,the literary contents of the number are of solid and varied interest4 ,altogether ,the ,ancestor is quite admirable in its aims1 which it seems determined to achieve in scholarly and attractive fashion40--,,the ,,globe4 8,the promise of a really authoritative periodical of ,english genealogy and family history will be received with general satisfaction4 ,this is given us in the announcement of ,the ,ancestor1 a quarterly to be edited by ,mr4 ,oswald ,barron and published by ,archibald ,constable ,co41 ,london4 ,mr4 ,barron's unusual knowledge in the field to be covered is well known to many who are interested in it4 ,the list of contributors1 including among others ,sir ,george ,sitwell1 ,sir ,h4 ,maxwell-,lyte1 ,mr4 ,j4 ,horace ,round1 and ,mr4 ,st4 ,john ,hope1 besides the editor1 certainly supports the promise of accuracy and authority40--,,the ,,nation1 ,,new ,,york4 99 99 99 99 99 ,history1 ,biography1 and ,criticism4 ,,anitchkow1 ,,michael4 ,war and ,labour4 ,demy #hvo4 #ahs4 ,,anon4 ,regeneration4 ,a ,reply to ,max ,nordau4 ,demy #hvo4 #ads4 ,,arnold1 ,t4 ,w41 ,b4,a4 ,the ,preaching of ,islam4 ,a ,work on the ,spread of the ,mohammedan ,religion by ,missionary ,methods4 ,demy #hvo4 #abs4 ,,bain1 ,r4 ,,nisbet4 ,the ,daughter of ,peter the ,great 7,the ,empress ,elisabeth74 ,a ,history of ,russian ,diplomacy and of the ,russian ,court1 #agda-agfb4 ,with ,photogravure ,frontispiece and several ,portraits4 ,demy #hvo4 #aes4 ---- ,peter ,,iii4 ,emperor of ,russia4 ,the ,story of a ,crisis and a ,crime4 ,illustrated with ,photogravure and ,collotype reproductions4 ,demy #hvo4 #ajs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,beatty1 ,,william1 ,m4,d4 7,surgeon of ,h4,m4,s4 ,victory74 ,an ,authentic ,narrative of the ,death of ,nelson4 ,with two ,illustrations4 ,crown #hvo4 #bs4 #f;d4 net4 ,second ,edition4 ,,bertram1 ,,james4 ,some ,memories of ,books1 ,authors and ,events4 ,recollections of ,sir ,walter ,scott1 ,de ,quincey1 ,john ,gibson ,lockhart1 etc4 ,with ,photogravure ,frontispiece4 ,demy #hvo4 #gs4 #f;d4 ,,birrell1 ,,augustine1 ,q4,c4 ,see ,boswell4 ,,boswell4 ,boswell's ,life of ,johnson4 ,edited by ,augustine ,birrell1 ,q4,c4 ,with ,frontispiece in ,photogravure to each volume by ,alexander ,ansted4 #f vols4 ,fcap4 #hvo4 ,cloth gilt1 designed by ,gleeson ,white1 or paper label uncut4 #abs4 net the set4 ,also half leather4 #ahs4 net the set4 ,limited ,edition4 ,illustrated with #ajj ,portraits selected by ,ernest ,radford4 #f ,volumes4 ,crown #hvo4 ,bound in red buckram1 paper label1 gilt top4 ,sold only in sets4 ,price #cfs4 net4 ---- ,boswell's ,account of ,dr4 ,johnson's ,tour to the ,hebrides4 ,with ,photogravure ,frontispieces4 ,uniform with #8,boswell's ,johnson4' ,cloth gilt or paper label4 #ds4 net the two vols4 ,also in half leather4 #fs4 net the two vols4 ,,bradley1 ,a4 ,g4 ,the ,fight with ,france for ,north ,america4 ,new ,illustrated ,edition4 ,extra ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,bright1 ,,charles1 ,f4,r4,s4,e4 ,science and ,engineering1 #ahcg-ahig4 ,large ,crown #hvo4 ,paper wrapper4 #as4 ,,bright1 ,e4 ,b41 and ,,charles1 ,f4,r4,s4,e4 ,the ,life of ,sir ,charles ,tilston ,bright4 ,with many ,illustrations1 ,portraits1 and ,maps4 #b vols4 ,demy #hvo4 #c #cs4 net4 ,,brown',s ,,letters4 ,edited by ,sidney ,t4 ,irwin4 ,see page #h4 ,,burroughs1 ,,john4 ,whitman3 ,a ,study4 ,crown #hvo4 ,cloth gilt4 #fs4 net4 ,,campbell1 ,,lord ,,archibald4 ,highland ,dress1 ,arms1 and ,ornament4 ,illustrated4 ,demy #hvo4 #bes4 net4 #8,,centurion4' ,army ,administration4 ,crown #hvo4 ,paper4 #as4 ,,chailley-,,bert1 ,j4 ,the ,colonisation of ,indo-,china4 ,with ,maps4 ,crown #hvo4 #gs4 #f;d4 ,,chamberlain1 ,,rt4 ,,hon4 ,,joseph1 ,m4,p41 ,d4,c4,l41 ,,ll4,d4 ,patriotism4 ,bound in buckram4 ,demy #hvo4 #bs4 ,,collins1 ,j4 ,,churton4 ,ephemera ,critica3 ,plain ,truths about ,current ,literature4 ,crown #hvo4 ,second ,edition4 #gs4 #f;d4 ,,courtney1 ,w4 ,l4 ,the ,idea of ,tragedy4 ,with a ,prefatory ,note by ,a4 ,w4 ,,pinero4 ,fcap4 #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,currie1 ,,major-,,general ,,fendall4 ,below the ,surface4 ,sketches of ,civil and ,native ,life in ,india4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,curzon1 ,,rt4 ,,hon4 ,,george ,n4 7,lord ,curzon of ,kedleston1 ,viceroy of ,india74 ,problems of the ,far ,east--,china1 ,japan1 ,korea4 ,with numerous ,illustrations and ,maps4 ,extra ,crown #hvo4 #gs4 #f;d4 ,,dale1 ,t4 ,f41 ,m4,a4 7,stoneclink74 ,the ,history of the ,belvoir ,hunt from the ,year #agbj4 ,see page #ag4 ---- ,the ,eighth ,duke of ,beaufort and the ,badminton ,hunt4 ,see page #ag4 ,,davidson1 ,,thomas4 ,a ,history of ,education4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 net4 ,,de ,,bury1 ,,mlle4 ,,blaze4 ,french ,literature of ,to-day4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,deighton1 ,,kenneth4 ,conjectural ,readings in the ,old ,dramatists4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,dinsmore1 ,,charles ,a4 ,the ,teachings of ,dante4 ,with illustrations4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 net4 ,,duff1 ,c4 ,,mabel4 ,the ,chronology of ,india4 ,from the ,earliest ,times to the ,beginning of the ,sixteenth ,century4 ,demy #hvo4 #aes4 net4 ,,dutt1 ,,romesh ,,chunder1 ,c4,i4,e4 ,the ,literature of ,bengal4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,fox1 ,,arthur ,w41 ,m4,a4 ,a ,book of ,bachelors4 ,essays on ,ten ,celebrated ,bachelors4 ,fully ,illustrated4 ,demy #hvo4 #afs4 ,,gairdner1 ,,james4 ,the ,paston ,letters1 #adbb-aeji4 ,crown #hvo4 #d vols4 ,vol4 ,i41 ,henry ,,vi41 #adbb-adfa4 ,vol4 ,,ii41 ,edward ,,iv41 #adfa-adga4 ,vol4 ,,iii41 #adga-aeji4 ,vol4 ,,iv4 ,introductory and ,supplementary4 ,edited by ,,james ,,gairdner1 of the ,public ,record ,office4 ,photogravure ,frontispiece to each vol4 #bas4 net4 ,vol4 ,,iv4 sold separately1 #ajs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,godkin1 ,e4 ,l4 ,problems of ,modern ,democracy4 ,large ,crown #hvo4 #gs4 #f;d4 ---- ,reflections and ,comments4 #ahfe-ahie4 ,large ,crown #hvo4 #gs4 #f;d4 ,,godkin1 ,e4 ,l4 ,unforeseen ,tendencies of ,democracy4 ,large ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 net4 ,,gomme1 ,g4 ,,laurence1 ,f4,s4,a4 7,statistical ,officer to the ,london ,county ,council74 ,the ,principles of ,local ,government4 ,demy #hvo4 #abs4 ,,gribble1 ,,francis4 ,lake ,geneva and its ,literary ,landmarks4 ,illustrated with ,photogravure and ,collotype reproductions4 ,demy #hvo4 #ahs4 ,,haileybury ,,college1 ,,memorials ,,of ,,old4 ,by ,,brand ,,sapte1 ,sir ,,monier ,,monier-,,williams1 ,,frederick ,,charles ,,danvers1 ,,percy ,,wigram1 ,sir ,,steuart ,,colvin ,,bayley1 and others4 ,with numerous ,illustrations and ,plans4 ,fcap4 #dto4 #bas4 net4 ,,hake1 ,a4 ,,egmont1 and ,,wesslau1 ,o4 ,e4 ,the ,coming ,individualism4 ,demy #hvo4 #ads4 ,,hanna1 ,,col4 ,h4 ,b4 ,the ,second ,afghan ,war4 ,demy #hvo4 ,vol4 ,i4 now ready1 #ajs4 net4 ,backwards or ,forwards8 ,can ,russia ,invade ,india8 ,see page #ah4 ,india's ,scientific ,frontier4 ,,hayden1 ,,eleanor ,g4 ,travels ,round our ,village4 ,a ,berkshire ,book4 7,dedicated by permission to ,lady ,wantage47 ,with numerous illustrations by ,l4 ,,leslie ,,brooke4 ,demy #hvo4 #gs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,hewitt1 ,j4 ,f4 ,the ,ruling ,races of ,prehistoric ,times in ,india1 ,south-,western ,asia1 and ,southern ,europe4 ,with ,diagrams and ,maps4 ,demy #hvo4 ,vol4 ,i41 #ahs42 ,vol4 ,,ii41 #abs4 ,,holden1 ,,edward ,s4 ,the ,mogul ,emperors of ,hindustan1 ,a4,d4 #acih-agjg4 ,with a chapter by ,sir ,w4 ,w4 ,,hunter4 ,with ,illustrations4 ,crown #hvo4 #ajs4 #f;d4 ,,houfe1 ,c4 ,a4 ,the ,question of the ,houses4 ,small #afmo4 #bs4 #f;d4 ,,irwin1 ,,sidney ,t4 ,letters of ,t4 ,e4 ,brown1 ,author of #8,betsy ,lee' and #8,foc's'le ,yarns4' #b vols4 ,crown #hvo4 #abs4 ,,james1 ,,william 7,professor of ,philosophy at ,harvard ,university74 ,human ,immortality4 ,two ,supposed ,objections to the ,doctrine4 #afmo4 #bs4 #f;d4 ,,krehbiel1 ,,henry ,,edward1 ,author of #8,how to ,listen to ,music4' ,music and ,manners in the ,classical ,period4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,lane-,,poole1 ,,stanley4 ,the ,mohammedan ,dynasties4 ,containing ,chronological ,tables of all the ,dynasties of the ,mohammedan ,empire from the ,foundation of the ,caliphate to the ,present ,day4 ,crown #hvo4 #abs4 net4 ,,leach1 ,a4 ,f41 ,m4,a41 ,f4,s4,a4 ,english ,schools at the ,reformation--#aedf-dh4 ,demy #hvo4 #abs4 net4 ,,legg1 ,l4 ,g4 ,,wickham1 and ,,hope1 ,w4 ,h4 ,,st4 ,,john4 ,inventories of ,christchurch1 ,canterbury4 ,demy #hvo4 #bas4 net4 ,mc,c,r,i,n,d,l,e1 ,j4 ,w4 ,ancient ,india as described in ,classical ,literature4 ,crown #hvo4 #gs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,macgeorge1 ,g4 ,w4 ,ways and ,works in ,india4 ,being an ,account of the ,public ,works in that ,country from the ,earliest ,times to the ,present ,day4 ,fully ,illustrated and ,five ,maps4 ,demy #hvo4 #afs4 ,mc,n,a,i,r1 ,,major ,j4 ,f4 ,a4 ,prisoners their own ,warders4 ,a ,record of the ,convict ,prison at ,singapore4 ,with many ,illustrations and ,maps4 ,demy #hvo4 #ajs4 #f;d4 ,,manchester ,,stage1 #ahhj-aijj4 ,criticisms reprinted from ,the ,manchester ,guardian4 ,fcap4 #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,masterman1 ,n41 ,m4,a4 ,chalmers on ,charity4 ,a ,selection of ,passages and ,scenes to ,illustrate the ,social ,teaching and ,practical ,work of ,thomas ,chalmers1 ,d4,d4 ,arranged and ,edited by ,n4 ,,masterman1 ,m4,a4 ,extra ,crown #hvo4 #gs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,meredith4 ,birthday ,book4 ,compiled and arranged by ,d4 ,m4 ,cloth gilt4 #ds4 #f;d4 ,,metcalfe1 ,,charles ,,theophilus1 ,c4,s4,i4 ,two ,native ,narratives of the ,mutiny in ,delhi4 ,translated from the ,originals by the late ,c4 ,t4 ,,metcalfe1 ,c4,s4,i4 ,with ,map and ,two ,illustrations4 #abs4 ,,mitchell1 ,,prof4 ,h4 ,g4 ,the ,world before ,abraham1 according to ,genesis i4-xi4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 net4 ,,morison1 ,m4 ,time ,table of ,modern ,history1 ,a4,d4 #djj-ahgj4 ,oblong ,folio4 ,cloth4 #abs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,contents4--,parallel ,tables1 ,genealogical ,tables4--,ruling ,monarchs4--,general ,chart of ,ancient and ,modern ,history4--,index4--,maps showing ,europe at various ,periods4 ,,morison1 ,,theodore1 ,m4,a4 ,imperial ,rule in ,india4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,m,,nsterberg1 ,,professor ,,hugo4 ,psychology and ,life4 ,demy #hvo4 #fs4 net4 ,,national ,,worthies4 ,see page #ba4 ,,newberry1 ,,percy ,e4 ,the ,life of ,rekhmara1 ,vzir of ,upper ,egypt under ,thothmes ,,iii4 and ,amenhetep ,,ii4 7circa ,b4,c4 #adga-addh74 ,with #bb ,plates4 #bas4 net4 ,only #bej printed4 ---- ,the ,gardens of the ,ancient ,world4 ,fully ,illustrated4 ,demy #hvo4 ,in preparation4 ,,nisbet1 ,,john4 ,burma ,under ,british ,rule4 #b ,volumes4 ,demy #hvo1 with ,frontispiece to each volume4 ,maps and ,plans4 ,price #cbs4 net4 ,,oppert1 ,,gustav1 ,ph4,d4 7,professor of ,sanscrit in the ,university of ,madras74 ,the ,original ,inhabitants of ,india4 ,demy #hvo4 #bjs4 ,,palmer1 ,,walter1 ,m4,p4 ,poultry ,management on a ,farm4 ,an account of three years' work with practical results and balance sheets4 ,illustrated4 ,demy #hvo4 #as4 ,,popowski1 ,,joseph4 ,translated by ,,arthur ,,baring ,,brabant1 and edited by ,,chas4 ,e4 ,d4 ,,black4 ,the ,rival ,powers in ,central ,asia4 ,with a large ,map of the ,pamir ,region4 ,demy #hvo4 #abs4 #f;d4 ,,rait1 ,,robert ,s4 ,five ,stuart ,princesses4 ,with ,photogravure and full-page ,portraits4 ,demy #hvo4 #abs4 #f;d4 net4 ---- ,lusus ,regius4 ,a ,volume of hitherto unpublished autograph works by ,king ,james ,i4 ,edited by ,,robert ,s4 ,,rait1 ,fellow of ,new ,college1 ,oxford4 ,illustrated by ,photogravure and ,collotype reproductions4 ,only #bge copies of this work have been printed1 #bej numbered copies being for sale4 ,price #dbs4 net4 ,,rice1 ,,louis4 ,the ,mysore ,gazetteer4 #b vols4 ,demy #hvo4 #cjs4 net4 ,,roosevelt1 ,,theodore4 ,oliver ,cromwell4 ,fully ,illustrated4 ,demy #hvo4 #ajs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,round1 ,j4 ,,horace1 ,m4,a4 ,the ,commune of ,london1 and other ,studies4 ,with a ,prefatory ,letter by ,sir ,,walter ,,besant4 ,demy #hvo4 #abs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,ryley1 ,g4 ,,buchanan1 and ,j4 ,m4 ,m',,candlish4 ,scotland's ,free ,church4 ,with an ,etched ,portrait and a ,photogravure and numerous other ,illustrations4 ,fcap4 #dto4 #ajs4 #f;d4 ,,schweitzer1 ,,georg4 ,emin ,pasha3 ,his ,life and ,work4 ,with an ,introduction by ,r4 ,w4 ,,felkin1 ,m4,d4 ,with ,portrait1 ,facsimiles1 and ,map4 #b vols4 ,demy #hvo4 #cbs4 ,,scott1 ,,eva 7late ,scholar of ,somerville ,college1 ,oxford74 ,rupert1 ,prince ,palatine4 ,with ,photogravure ,frontispiece4 ,large ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,second ,edition4 ,,seton-,,watson1 ,r4 ,w4 ,maximilian4 ,stanhope ,essay4 ,illustrated4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 net4 ,,siborne1 ,,captain ,,william4 ,the ,waterloo ,campaign1 #ahae4 ,with #ac ,portraits of ,generals1 and #ae ,maps and ,plans4 ,crown #hvo4 #hcb pages4 ,new ,edition4 #fs4 ,,sichel1 ,,edith4 ,the ,household of the ,lafayettes4 ,with ,photogravure ,frontispiece4 ,large ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,second ,edition4 ,,sichel1 ,,edith4 ,women and ,men of the ,french ,renaissance4 ,illustrated4 ,demy #hvo4 ,price #afs4 net4 ,,smith1 ,,edward4 ,england and ,america4 ,a ,short ,examination of their ,international ,intercourse4 #aghc-ahgb4 ,demy #hvo4 #ads4 ,,smythe1 ,a4 ,j4 ,the ,life of ,william ,terriss1 ,actor4 ,illustrated4 ,demy #hvo4 #abs4 #f;d4 ,,sneath1 ,e4 ,,hershey 7,ph4,d41 ,professor of ,philosophy in ,yale ,university74 ,the ,mind of ,tennyson4 ,his ,thoughts on ,god1 ,freedom1 and ,immortality4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 net4 ,,spalding1 ,,thomas ,,alfred4 ,the ,life and ,times of ,richard ,badiley1 ,vice-,admiral of the ,fleet4 ,demy #hvo4 #aes4 ,,stein1 ,m4 ,a4 ,kalhana's ,rajatarangini4 ,a ,chronicle of the ,kings of ,kashmir1 with #c ,maps4 ,translated1 with an ,introduction1 ,commentary and ,appendices4 #b ,volumes4 #c #cs4 net4 ,,street1 ,g4 ,s4 ,a ,book of ,essays4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,stuart1 ,,john4 ,pictures of ,war4 ,illustrated with ,maps and ,plans4 ,crown #hvo4 #gs4 #f;d4 ,,thornton1 ,,surgeon-,,general1 ,c4,b4 ,memories of ,seven ,campaigns4 ,with numerous ,illustrations by ,george and ,kate ,thornton4 ,large ,demy #hvo4 #ags4 #f;d4 net4 ,,townsend1 ,,meredith4 ,asia and ,europe4 ,being ,studies presenting the conclusions formed by the ,author in a long life devoted to the subject of the relations between ,asia and ,europe4 ,demy #hvo4 #ajs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,traill1 ,h4 ,d4 ,england1 ,egypt1 and the ,sudan4 ,with ,maps4 ,demy #hvo4 #abs4 ,,vallery-,,radot1 ,,ren4 ,the ,life of ,pasteur4 ,translated from the ,french by ,mrs4 ,r4 ,l4 ,,devonshire4 #b ,volumes4 ,demy #hvo4 ,with ,frontispiece ,portrait of ,pasteur4 ,price #cbs4 ,,vibart1 ,,colonel ,,henry ,m4 ,addiscombe3 ,its ,heroes and ,men of ,note4 ,with a ,preface by ,,lord ,,roberts of ,kandahar4 ,fully ,illustrated4 ,fcap4 #dto4 #bas4 net4 ,,whiteway1 ,r4 ,s4 7,bengal ,civil ,service1 retired74 ,the ,rise of ,portuguese ,power in ,india1 #adig-aeej4 ,demy #hvo4 #aes4 net4 ,,wicksteed1 ,,rev4 ,p4 ,h4 ,the ,chronicle of ,villani4 ,translated by ,,rose ,e4 ,,selfe and edited by the ,rev4 ,p4 ,h4 ,,wicksteed4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,wicksteed1 ,,philip ,h41 ,m4,a41 and ,,gardner1 ,,edmund ,g41 ,m4,a4 ,dante and ,giovanni del ,virgilio4 ,including a ,critical ,edition of the text of ,dante's #8,eclogae ,latinae1' and of the ,poetic ,remains of ,giovanni del ,virgilio4 ,demy #hvo4 ,price #abs4 ,,wilkinson1 ,,spenser4 ,war and ,policy4 ,demy #hvo4 #aes4 ---- ,the ,nation's ,awakening4 ,essays ,towards a ,british ,policy4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 ,,winslow1 ,,anna ,,green4 ,diary of a ,boston ,school ,girl4 ,edited by ,,alice ,,morse ,,earle4 ,with #g ,illustrations4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,wood1 ,,walter4 ,with the ,flag at ,sea4 ,illustrated with numerous full-page plates by ,h4 ,c4 ,,seppings ,,wright4 ,cloth gilt4 ,extra ,crown #hvo4 ,price #fs4 99 99 99 99 99 ,travel4 ,,battye1 ,,aubyn ,,trevor-1 ,f4,l4,s41 ,f4,z4,s4 ,author of #8,icebound on ,kolguev4' ,a ,northern ,highway of the ,czar4 ,fully ,illustrated4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,constable',s ,hand ,atlas of ,india4 ,a new series of ,sixty ,maps and ,plans prepared from ,ordnance and other ,surveys under the direction of ,j4 ,g4 ,,bartholomew1 ,f4,r4,g4,s41 ,f4,r4,s4,e41 etc4 ,crown #hvo4 ,strongly bound in ,half ,morocco4 ,price #ads4 ,this ,atlas will be found of great use not only to tourists and travellers1 but also to readers of ,indian history2 it contains twenty-two plans of the principal towns of our ,indian ,empire1 based on the most recent surveys and officially revised to date in ,india4 ,constable's ,hand ,gazetteer of ,india4 ,compiled under the direction of ,j4 ,g4 ,,bartholomew1 ,f4,r4,g4,s41 and ,edited with ,additions by ,,jas4 ,,burgess1 ,c4,i4,e41 ,,ll4,d41 etc4 ,crown #hvo4 ,half ,morocco4 ,price #ajs4 #f;d4 ,the ,hand ,gazetteer of ,india is based on the ,index to ,constable's ,hand ,atlas of ,india1 which contains nearly #ab1jjj place-names4 ,to these have been added very largely from various sources1 bringing the number of entries to close upon #bj1jjj4 ,the populations of districts1 towns1 and villages1 and the position of each place are clearly indicated1 thus forming within a small compass a general reference book to the topography of ,india1 and a companion volume to the ,hand ,atlas of ,india4 ,,conway1 ,,sir ,,william ,,martin4 ,the ,alps from ,end to ,end4 ,with over #ej full page ,illustrations by ,a4 ,d4 ,m',,cormick4 ,large ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,new ,edition4 ,,durand1 ,,lad4 ,an ,autumn ,tour in ,western ,persia4 ,demy #hvo4 ,illustrated4 ,,elliott1 ,,robert ,h4 ,gold1 ,sport1 and ,coffee ,planting in ,mysore4 ,being the ,thirty-eight ,years' ,experience of a ,mysore ,planter4 ,crown #hvo4 #gs4 #f;d4 ,,engelhardt1 ,,alexander ,,platonovich1 ,governor of the ,province of ,archangel4 ,a ,russian ,province of the ,north 7,archangel74 ,translated from the ,russian by ,,henry ,,cooke4 ,with #ij ,illustrations and #c ,maps4 ,royal #hvo4 #ahs4 ,,filippi1 ,,filippo ,de4 ,the ,ascent of ,mount ,st4 ,elias 7,alaska74 ,by ,h4,r4,h4 ,prince ,,luigi ,,amedeo ,,di ,,savoia1 ,duke of the ,abruzzi4 ,narrated by ,,filippo ,,de ,,filippi4 ,illustrated by ,,vittoria ,,sella1 and ,translated by ,,signora ,,linda ,,villari4 #dto4 #cas4 #f;d4 net4 ,edition de ,luxe1 #c #cs4 net4 ,,hodgson1 ,,randolph ,,llewellyn4 ,on ,plain and ,peak4 ,sport in ,bohemia and ,tyrol4 ,illustrated by ,h4,s4,h4 ,,princess ,,mary ,,of ,,thurn ,,and ,,taxis1 and from ,photographs4 ,demy #hvo4 #gs4 #f;d4 ,,lachambre1 ,,henri1 and ,,machuron1 ,,alexis4 ,andre and ,his ,balloon4 ,with a ,coloured ,frontispiece and #dj ,full-page ,plates after ,photographs taken by the ,authors during the time of preparation and at the time of start4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,meakin1 ,,annette ,m4 ,b4 ,a ,ribbon of ,iron4 ,fully ,illustrated4 ,crown #hvo4 ,price #fs4 ,this is an account of a journey over the ,great ,siberian ,railway and down to the lower part of the ,amur ,river to ,blagovestchensk and thence to ,vladivostok4 ,the author relates her adventures in a novel field 7which just at present has a special interest7 in plain and natural language4 ,the account of the outbreak of hostilities at ,blagovestchensk will be found particularly interesting4 ,,nansen1 ,,fridtjof4 ,farthest ,north4 ,a ,new ,edition4 ,with #bj full-page ,illustrations and #b ,maps4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,ookhtomsky1 ,,prince ,e4 ,travels in the ,east of ,his ,imperial ,majesty ,czar ,nicholas ,,ii of ,russia3 when ,cesarewitch4 ,written by order of ,his ,imperial ,majesty and translated by ,,robert ,,goodlet4 ,in #b vols41 with about #ejj ,illustrations engraved on wood and numerous ,heliogravure ,plates4 ,edited by ,,sir ,,george ,,birdwood1 ,m4,d41 ,k4,c4,i4,e4 ,imperial #dto4 #e #es4 net4 ,also a ,hand-made ,paper ,edition4 ,limited to #cj copies for ,england and ,america4 #be guineas net4 ,,prichard1 ,,hesketh4 ,where ,black ,rules ,white4 ,across and about the ,black ,republic of ,hayti4 ,fully ,illustrated4 ,demy #hvo4 #abs4 ,,roberts1 ,,morley4 ,the ,western ,avernus4 ,a new edition1 with ,illustrations by ,a4 ,d4 ,m',,cormick1 and from ,photographs4 ,crown #hvo4 #gs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,sangermano1 ,,father4 ,burma a ,hundred ,years ,ago4 ,edited with ,notes and ,introduction by the ,,hon4 ,,mr4 ,,justice ,,jardine4 ,with a ,map4 ,demy #hvo4 #ajs4 #f;d4 ,,stadling1 ,j4 ,through ,siberia4 ,edited by ,dr4 ,f4 ,h4 ,h4 ,,guillemard4 ,fully ,illustrated4 ,demy #hvo4 #aes4 ,,waddell1 ,surg4-,maj4 ,l4 ,a4 ,among the ,himalayas4 ,with numerous ,illustrations by ,a4 ,d4 ,m',,cormick1 the ,author1 and from ,photographs4 ,large ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,second ,edition4 ,,young1 ,,ernest 7,late of the ,education ,department1 ,siam74 ,the ,kingdom of the ,yellow ,robe4 ,being ,sketches of the ,domestic and ,religious ,rites and ,ceremonies of the ,siamese4 ,with numerous ,illustrations by ,e4 ,a4 ,,norbury1 ,r4,c4,a41 and from ,photographs4 ,large ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,second ,edition4 ,sport4 ,,dale1 ,t4 ,f4 7,stoneclink47 ,history of the ,belvoir ,hunt4 ,with ,map and many ,illustrations4 ,demy #hvo4 #bas4 net4 ---- ,the ,eighth ,duke of ,beaufort and the ,badminton ,hunt4 ,illustrated4 ,demy #hvo4 ,price #bas4 ,,elliott1 ,,robert ,h4 ,gold1 ,sport1 and ,coffee ,planting in ,mysore4 ,being the ,thirty ,years' ,experience of a ,mysore ,planter4 ,crown #hvo4 #gs4 #f;d4 ,,hodgson1 ,,randolph ,,llewellyn4 ,on ,plain and ,peak4 ,sport in ,bohemia and ,tyrol4 ,illustrated by ,h4,s4,h4 ,,princess ,,mary ,,of ,,thurn ,,and ,,taxis1 and from ,photographs4 ,demy #hvo4 #gs4 #f;d4 ,,kennedy1 ,,admiral4 ,sport in the ,navy4 ,,walker1 ,,charles4 ,shooting on a ,small ,income4 ,illustrated4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 ---- ,amateur ,fish ,culture4 ,cr4 #hvo4 #bs4 #f;d4 net4 99 99 99 99 99 ,naval and ,military4 ,,anitchkow1 ,,michael4 ,war and ,labour4 ,demy #hvo4 #ahs4 #8,,centurion4' ,army ,administration4 ,crown #hvo4 ,paper1 #as4 ,,hanna1 ,,col4 ,h4 ,b4 ,can ,russia ,invade ,india8 7,indian ,problems ,no4 #a47 ,crown #hvo4 #bs4 #f;d4 ---- ,india's ,scientific ,frontier4 ,where is it8 ,what is it8 7,indian ,problems ,no4 #b47 ,crown #hvo4 #bs4 #f;d4 ---- ,backwards or ,forwards8 7,indian ,problems ,no4 #c47 ,crown #hvo4 #bs4 #f;d4 ---- ,the ,second ,afghan ,war4 #ahgh-hj4 ,vol4 ,i4 ,demy #hvo4 #ajs4 net4 ,,mayo1 ,,john ,,horsley4 ,medals and ,decorations of the ,british ,army and ,navy4 ,with numerous ,coloured ,plates and other ,illustrations4 #b vols4 ,demy #hvo4 #c #cs4 net4 ,,siborne1 ,,captain ,,william4 ,the ,waterloo ,campaign1 #ahae4 ,with #ac ,portraits of ,generals1 and #ae ,maps and ,plans4 ,large ,crown #hvo4 #hcb pages4 #fs4 ,,spalding1 ,,thomas ,,alfred4 ,the ,life and ,times of ,richard ,badiley1 ,vice-,admiral of the ,fleet4 ,demy #hvo4 #aes4 ,,vibart1 ,,colonel ,h4 ,m4 ,addiscombe4 ,see page #ac4 ,,wilkinson1 ,,spenser4 ,the ,brain of an ,army4 ,a ,popular ,account of the ,german ,general ,staff4 ,with ,letters from ,count ,moltke and ,lord ,roberts1 and #c ,plans4 ,crown #hvo4 #bs4 #f;d4 ---- ,the ,command of the ,sea1 and ,the ,brain of the ,navy4 ,crown #hvo4 ,cloth1 #bs4 #f;d4 ---- ,lessons of the ,war4 ,a ,weekly ,comment to the ,relief of ,ladysmith4 ,crown #hvo4 #bs4 #f;d4 ---- ,the ,nation's ,awakening4 ,essays towards a ,british ,policy4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 ,,contents4 ,our ,past ,apathy4 ,the ,aims of the ,great ,powers4 ,the ,defence of ,british ,interests4 ,the ,organization of ,government for the ,defence of ,british ,interests4 ,the ,idea of the ,nation4 ---- ,the ,volunteers and the ,national ,defence4 ,crown #hvo4 ,cloth1 #bs4 #f;d4 ---- ,war and ,policy4 ,essays4 ,demy #hvo4 #aes4 99 99 99 99 99 ,fine ,art4 ,,brownell1 ,w4 ,c4 ,french ,art4 ,classic and ,contemporary ,painting and ,sculpture4 ,with #dh ,illustrations4 ,small ,imperial #hvo4 ,,cole1 ,,alan ,s4 ,ornament in ,european ,silks4 ,with #afg ,illustrations4 ,bound in half vellum4 ,crown #dto4 #cbs4 net4 ,,cunynghame1 ,,henry4 ,art-,enamelling upon ,metals4 ,containing both a ,history of the ,art and an ,account of the ,manufacture of the same4 #b ,coloured ,plates and #bj ,illustrations4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 net4 ,second ,edition4 ,,daniell1 ,a4 ,e4 ,london ,city ,churches4 ,with numerous ,illustrations by ,,leonard ,,martin1 and a ,map4 ,imperial #afmo4 #fs4 ,second ,edition4 ---- ,london ,riverside ,churches4 ,with #hd ,illustrations and a ,photogravure ,frontispiece by ,,alexander ,,ansted4 ,imperial #afmo4 #fs4 ,,granby1 ,,marchioness ,,of4 ,portraits of ,men and ,women4 ,a series of #ea reproductions of the ,marchioness of ,granby's ,pencil ,portraits of well-known ,men and ,women of the ,day4 ,half vellum4 ,royal ,quarto4 #b #bs4 net4 ,,hope1 ,w4 ,h4 ,,st4 ,,john1 ,f4,s4,a4 ,the ,stall ,plates of the ,knights of the ,order of the ,garter1 #acdh-adhe4 ,imperial #hvo4 ,with #ij full-page coloured plates printed upon ,japan vellum4 ,edition limited to #ejj copies4 ,complete in ,one ,volume4 ,bound in half leather gilt1 price #f net2 plates and sheets loose in a portfolio1 #e #ajs4 net2 without binding or portfolio1 #e net4 ,,hyde1 ,,william4 ,the ,nature ,poems of ,george ,meredith4 ,with #bj ,full-page ,pictures in ,photogravure by ,,william ,,hyde4 ,edition limited to #cej copies4 ,bound in cloth4 #b #abs4 #f;d4 net4 ,also a large paper edition of #aej copies1 #e #es4 net4 ,,hyde1 ,,william1 and ,,meynell1 ,,alice4 ,london ,impressions4 ,pictures in ,photogravure and ,etchings by ,,william ,,hyde1 and ,essays by ,,alice ,,meynell4 ,royal ,quarto4 ,edition limited to #bej copies on hand-made paper1 bound in vellum gilt4 #h #hs4 net4 ,,legg 7,,leopold ,g4 ,,wickham1 ,b4,a47 ,english ,coronation ,records4 ,illustrated ,edition limited to #ejj copies4 ,imp4 #hvo4 #cas4 #f;d4 net4 ,,mayo1 ,,john ,,horsley4 ,medals and ,decorations of the ,british ,army and ,navy4 ,with a large number of ,coloured ,plates and other ,illustrations4 #b vols4 ,demy #hvo4 #c #cs4 net4 ,,national ,,worthies4 ,a selection of ,portraits from the ,national ,portrait ,gallery of ,london4 #adj ,illustrations and ,biographical ,notes to each4 ,bound in full leather gilt1 tooled4 ,crown #dto4 #b #bs4 net4 ,,newberry1 ,,percy ,e4 ,the ,life of ,rekhmara4 ,see page #aj4 ---- ,the ,gardens of the ,ancient ,world4 ,see page #aj4 ,,the ,,st4 ,,george',s ,,calendar for #aijb4 ,illustrated1 with #ab ,coloured ,plates of the ,arms of a ,family of ,distinction1 with a short note of its origin4 ,price #as4 net4 99 99 99 99 99 ,educational and ,technical4 ,,arber1 ,,prof4 ,,edward1 ,f4,s4,a4 ,works ,edited by4 ,english ,reprints4 ,edited by ,prof4 ,,edward ,,arber1 ,f4,s4,a41 ,fellow of ,king's ,college1 ,london1 late ,english ,examiner at the ,london ,university1 and also at the ,victoria ,university1 ,manchester4 ,cloth1 gilt4 #a4 ,,milton--,areopagitica4 #afdd4 #as4 net4 #b4 ,,latimer--,the ,ploughers4 #aedi4 #as4 net4 #c4 ,,gosson--,the ,school of ,abuse4 #aegi4 #as4 net4 #d4 ,,sidney--,an ,apology for ,poetry4 8#aehj4 #as4 net4 #e4 ,,webbe1 ,e4--,travels4 #aeij4 #as4 net4 #f4 ,,selden--,table ,talk4 #afcd-ed4 #as4 net4 #g4 ,,ascham--,toxophilus4 #aedd4 #as4 net4 #h4 ,,addison--,criticism on #8,paradise ,lost4' #agaa-ab4 #as4 net4 #i4 ,,lyly--,euphues4 #aegi-hj4 #ds4 net4 #aj4 ,,villiers--,the ,rehearsal4 #afga4 #as4 net4 #aa4 ,,gascoigne--,the ,steel ,glass1 etc4 #aegf4 #as4 net4 #ab4 ,,earle--,micro-cosmographie4 #afbh4 #as4 net4 #ac4 ,,latimer--#g ,sermons before ,edward ,,vi4 #aedi4 #as4 #f;d4 net4 #ad4 ,,more--,utopia4 #aeaf-eg4 #as4 net4 #ae4 ,,puttenham--,the ,art of ,english ,poesy4 #aehi4 #bs4 #f;d4 net4 #af4 ,,howell--,instructions for ,foreign ,travel4 #afdb4 #as4 net4 #ag4 ,,udall--,roister ,doister4 #aeec-ff4 #as4 net4 #ah4 ,,monk ,,of ,,evesham--,the ,revelation1 etc4 #aahf-adaj4 #as4 net4 #ai4 ,,james ,i4--,a ,counterblast to ,tobacco1 etc4 #afjd4 #as4 net4 #bj4 ,,naunton--,fragmenta ,regalia4 #afec4 #as4 net4 #ba4 ,,watson--,poems4 #aehb-ic4 #as4 #f;d4 net4 #bb4 ,,habington--,castara4 #afdj4 #as4 net4 #bc4 ,,ascham--,the ,schoolmaster4 #aegj4 #as4 net4 #bd4 ,,tottel',s ,,miscellany--,songs and ,sonnets4 #aeeg4 #bs4 #f;d4 net4 #be4 ,,lever--,sermons4 #aeej4 #as4 net4 #bf4 ,,webbe1 ,w4--,a ,discourse of ,english ,poetry4 #aehf4 #as4 net4 #bg4 ,,lord ,,bacon--,a ,harmony of the #8,essays4' #aeig-afbf4 #es4 net4 #bh4 ,,roy1 ,etc4--,read me1 and be not ,wroth6 #aebh4 #as4 #f;d4 net4 #bi4 ,,raleigh1 ,etc4--,last ,fight of the #8,revenge4' #aeia4 #as4 net4 #cj4 ,,googe--,eclogues1 ,epitaphs1 and ,sonnets4 #aefc4 #as4 net4 ,english ,scholar's ,library1 ,the4 ,edited by ,prof4 ,,edward ,,arber4 #hvo1 cloth1 gilt4 #a4 ,,william ,,caxton--,reynard the ,fox4 #as4 #f;d4 net4 #b4 ,,john ,,knox--,the ,first ,blast of the ,trumpet4 #as4 #f;d4 net4 #c4 ,,clement ,,robinson and ,others--,a ,handful of ,pleasant ,delights4 #as4 #f;d4 net4 #d4 ,,simon ,,fish--,a ,supplication for the ,beggars4 #as4 #f;d4 net4 #e4 ,,rev4 ,,john ,,udall--,diotrephes4 #as4 #f;d4 net4 #f4 8--,the ,return from ,parnassus4 #as4 #f;d4 net4 #g4 ,,thomas ,,decker--,the ,seven ,deadly ,sins of ,london4 #as4 #f;d4 net4 #h4 ,,edward ,,arber--,an ,introductory ,sketch to the #8,martin ,marprelate' ,controversy4 #aehh-aeij4 #cs4 net4 #i4 ,,rev4 ,,john ,,udall--,a ,demonstration of ,discipline4 #as4 #f;d4 net4 #aj4 ,,richard ,,stanihurst--neid ,i4-,,iv41 in ,english ,hexameters4 #cs4 net4 #aa4 ,,martin ,,marprelate--,the ,epistle4 #as4 #f;d4 net4 #ab4 ,,robert ,,greene--,menaphon4 #as4 #f;d4 net4 #ac4 ,,george ,,joy--,an ,apology to ,william ,tyndale4 #as4 #f;d4 net4 #ad4 ,,richard ,,barnfield---,poems4 #cs4 net4 #ae4 ,,bishop ,,thomas ,,cooper--,an ,admonition to the ,people of ,england4 #cs4 net4 #af4 ,,captain ,,john ,,smith--,works4 #aabj pp4 ,six ,facsimile ,maps4 #b vols4 #abs4 #f;d4 net4 ,out of print4 ,garner1 ,an ,english4 ,new ,edition in preparation4 ,this ,miscellany embodies the results of more than fifteen years' persistent search after the rarest and most valuable ,tracts and ,poems in our ,literature that are not generally known4 ,only one copy now survives of the original edition of many of these ,texts2 and that copy is often not to be found in any ,public ,library4 ,these volumes constitute a charming ,pleasure ,series of ,english ,literature2 full of most varied and graphic ,narratives1 and of most delightful and diversified ,poetry4 ,but a much higher use than that can be made of this ,english ,garner4 ,all ,history is ultimately based upon eye-witness testimony1 or upon written documents4 ,this ,series will throw floods of light upon many little-known facts1 or periods1 of ,england's past story4 ,an ,english ,garner also contains many hundreds of ,poems1 many of them written in the ,golden ,age of ,english ,song4 ,this ,poetry represents almost every conceivable form of ,english versification2 and its topics range #8,from grave to gay1 from lively to severe2' or1 to put it in another way1 from ,sir ,j4 ,,davies' poem on the #8,immortality of the ,soul1' down to #8,old ,king ,cole4' ,,ballin1 ,,mrs4 ,,ada4 ,from ,cradle to ,school4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,bankes1 ,,roden4 ,a ,story ,book for ,lesson ,time4 ,crown #hvo4 ,cloth1 #as4 ,,beaumont1 ,w4 ,,worby1 ,m4 ,inst4 ,c4,e4 ,motor ,vehicles and ,motors4 ,their ,design1 ,construction1 and ,working by ,steam1 ,oil1 and ,electricity4 ,with over #cjj ,illustrations and ,working ,drawings4 #dto4 #dbs4 net4 ,,blount1 ,,bertram4 ,practical ,electro-,chemistry4 ,fully ,illustrated4 ,demy #hvo4 #aes4 net4 ,,bonavia1 ,,emmanuel1 ,m4,d4 ,the ,flora of the ,assyrian ,monuments4 ,with numerous ,illustrations4 ,demy #hvo4 #ajs4 net4 ---- ,studies in the ,evolution of ,animals4 ,with over #ajj ,illustrations4 ,fcap4 #dto4 #bas4 net4 ,,bright1 ,,charles1 ,f4,r4,s4,e4 ,science and ,engineering1 #ahcg-ahig4 ,large ,crown #hvo4 ,paper wrapper4 #as4 ,,coldstream1 ,j4 ,p4 ,the ,institutions of ,austria4 ,fcap4 #hvo4 ,cloth1 #bs4 ---- ,the ,institutions of ,italy4 ,fcap4 #hvo4 ,cloth1 #bs4 ,,constable',s ,,hand ,,atlas ,,of ,,india4 ,see page #ad4 ,,constable',s ,,hand ,,gazetteer ,,of ,,india4 ,see page #ad4 ,,cunynghame1 ,,henry1 ,c4,b41 ,m4,a4 ,art-,enamelling upon ,metals4 ,with many coloured and other ,illustrations4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 net4 ,second ,edition4 ,,davidson1 ,,thomas 7,author of #8,aristotle and the ,ancient ,educational ,ideals1' #8,rousseau and ,education according to ,nature1' etc474 ,a ,history of ,education4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 net4 ,,gall1 ,,john1 ,m4,a41 ,,ll4,b4 7,late ,professor of ,mathematics and ,physics1 ,canning ,college1 ,lucknow71 and ,,robertson1 ,,david1 ,m4,a41 ,,ll4,b41 ,b4,sc4 ,popular ,readings in ,science4 ,with many ,diagrams1 a ,glossary of ,technical ,terms1 and an ,index4 ,crown #hvo1 pp4 #dfh4 #ds4 ,new ,edition4 ,,hackel1 ,,eduard4 ,the ,true ,grasses4 ,authorized ,translation4 ,with over #ij ,illustrations and ,diagrams1 and a voluminous ,glossary of ,technical ,terms4 ,demy #hvo4 #ajs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,holland1 ,,clive4 ,the ,use of the ,hand ,camera4 ,with an ,introduction by ,a4 ,,horsley ,,hinton1 and #bb ,illustrations4 ,crown #hvo4 ,cloth1 #bs4 #f;d4 ,,james1 ,,william4 ,human ,immortality4 #afmo4 #bs4 #f;d4 ,fourth ,edition4 ,,leach1 ,a4 ,f41 ,m4,a41 ,f4,s4,a4 ,english ,schools at the ,reformation4 #aedf-h4 ,demy #hvo4 #abs4 net4 ,,leaf1 ,,cecil ,h41 ,m4,a41 ,f4,r4,c4,s4 ,the ,surgical ,anatomy of the ,lymphatic ,glands4 ,with numerous ,coloured ,plates4 ,demy #hvo4 #ajs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,leaf1 ,h4 ,m41 ,a4,m4,inst4,c4,e41 ,m4,i4,m4,e4 ,the ,internal ,wiring of ,buildings4 ,with numerous ,illustrations4 ,new ,edition in preparation4 ,,lewes1 ,,vivian ,b4 ,acetylene4 ,a ,handbook for the ,student and ,manufacturer4 ,with over #bjj ,illustrations4 ,demy #hvo4 #cas4 #f;d4 net4 ---- 7,professor of ,chemistry1 ,royal ,naval ,college71 and ,,brame1 ,j4 ,s4 ,s4 7,demonstrator in ,chemistry1 ,royal ,naval ,college1 and ,assistant ,examiner in ,chemistry1 ,science and ,art ,department74 ,laboratory ,note ,book for ,chemical ,students4 #ds4 ,,morison1 ,m4 ,time ,table of ,modern ,history1 ,a4,d4 #djj-ahgj4 ,see page #i4 ,m,,nsterberg1 ,,professor ,,hugo4 ,psychology and ,life4 ,demy #hvo4 #fs4 net4 ,,peel1 ,,mrs4 ,c4 ,s4 ,the ,new ,home4 ,how to ,furnish on ,small ,incomes4 ,with many ,illustrations by ,,agnes ,,walker4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ---- ,ten ,shillings a ,head per ,week for ,house ,books4 ,a ,manual for the ,economical ,housekeeper4 ,containing a large number of ,new ,recipes4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,rogers1 ,c4 ,j4 ,coin ,collecting in ,northern ,india4 #ajs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,scrutton1 ,,percy ,e4 ,electricity in ,town and ,country ,houses4 ,fully illustrated4 ,crown #hvo4 #bs4 #f;d4 ,third ,edition4 ,,spenser4 ,the ,faerie ,queene4 ,edited by ,,kate ,m4 ,,warren4 ,with a ,glossary and ,notes to each volume4 ,in #f vols4 ,fcap4 #hvo4 ,cloth1 #as4 #f;d4 net per vol4 ,cloth gilt1 with ,photogravure ,frontispiece1 #bs4 #f;d4 net per vol4 ,each vol4 sold separately4 ,,tarver1 ,j4 ,c4 ,some ,observations of a ,foster ,parent4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,second ,edition4 ---- ,debateable ,claims4 ,essays on ,secondary ,education4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ---- ,tiberius the ,tyrant4 ,demy #hvo4 #afs4 net4 ,,the ,,prevention ,,of ,,disease4 ,prophylaxis in ,surgery ,operations1 ,the ,treatment of ,fractures and ,dislocation1 ,wounds1 ,deformities and ,tumours1 ,medicine and ,insanity4 ,by ,,dr4 ,,bing1 ,vienna2 ,,dr4 ,,einhorn1 ,new ,york2 ,,dr4 ,,fischl1 ,prague2 ,,dr4 ,,flatau1 ,berlin2 ,,dr4 ,,fuchs1 ,ernmendingen2 ,,dr4 ,,goldschmidt1 ,reichenhall2 ,,dr4 ,,greve1 ,magdeburg2 ,,dr4 ,,hoffa1 ,wrzburg2 ,,dr4 ,,max ,,joseph1 ,berlin2 ,,dr4 ,k,,nigsh,,fer1 ,stuttgart2 ,,dr4 ,,kollmann1 ,leipzig2 ,,dr4 ,,lilienfeld1 ,wrzburg2 ,,dr4 ,,martius1 ,rostock2 ,,dr4 ,,mendelsohn1 ,berlin2 ,,dr4 ,j4 ,v4 ,,notthefft1 ,mnchen2 ,,dr4 ,,rosen1 ,berlin2 ,,dr4 ,o4 ,,schaeffer1 ,heidelberg2 ,,dr4 ,,windscheid1 ,leipzic4 ,with an ,introduction by ,h4 ,,timbrell ,,bulstrode1 ,m4,a41 ,d4,p4,h4 ,royal ,college of ,physicians and ,surgeons1 ,m4,r4,c4,s4 ,eng41 ,l4,r4,c4,p4 ,london4 ,medical ,inspector ,h4,m4 ,local ,government ,board4 ,demy #hvo4 ,,thomson1 ,,prof4 ,j4 ,j41 ,f4,r4,s4 ,the ,discharge of ,electricity through ,gases4 ,illustrated4 ,crown #hvo4 #ds4 #f;d4 net4 ,,torrey1 ,,joseph4 ,elementary ,studies in ,chemistry4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 net4 ,,turner1 ,h4 ,h41 ,f4,r4,s4 ,modern ,astronomy4 ,being some ,account of the ,revolution of the ,last ,quarter of the ,century4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 net4 ,,warren1 ,,kate ,m4 ,see ,spenser1 ,faerie ,queene4 ,,webb1 ,,surgeon-,,captain ,w4 ,w4 ,the ,coins of the ,hindu ,states of ,rajputana4 ,with #ab ,plates1 and a ,map in colours4 ,royal #hvo4 #afs4 net4 ,,zimmermann1 ,,dr4 ,a4 ,botanical ,microtechnique4 ,by ,,dr4 ,a4 ,,zimmermann4 ,with ,sixty ,illustrations and ,diagrams4 ,demy #hvo4 #abs4 net4 99 99 99 99 99 ,religious ,books4 ,,arnold1 ,t4 ,w4 ,the ,preaching of ,islam4 ,demy #hvo4 #abs4 ,,books ,,of ,,the ,,bible4 ,the ,psalms4 ,st4 ,matthew4 ,st4 ,mark4 ,st4 ,luke4 ,st4 ,john4 ,printed in red and black by ,t4 ,a4 ,constable4 ,bound in cloth label1 #as4 net per vol42 cloth gilt1 #as4 #f;d4 net per vol42 leather gilt1 #bs4 #f;d4 net per vol4 ,also ,the ,four ,gospels4 ,in one volume4 ,paper label1 #bs4 #f;d4 net2 gilt cloth1 #cs4 net2 leather1 #es4 net4 ,,daniell1 ,a4 ,e4 ,london ,city ,churches4 ,with numerous ,illustrations by ,,leonard ,,martin1 and a ,map4 ,imperial #afmo4 #fs4 ---- ,london ,riverside ,churches4 ,with numerous ,illustrations by ,,alexander ,,ansted4 ,imperial #afmo4 #fs4 ,,four ,,gospels4 ,see #8,books of the ,bible4' ,,harald1 ,j4 ,h4 ,the ,knowledge of ,life4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,james1 ,,william 7,professor of ,philosophy at ,harvard ,university74 ,human ,immortality4 ,two supposed ,objections to the ,doctrine4 #afmo4 #bs4 #f;d4 ,,madge1 ,h4 ,d4 ,leaves from the ,golden ,legend4 ,chosen by ,h4 ,d4 ,,madge1 ,,ll4,m4 ,with numerous ,illustrations by ,h4 ,m4 ,,watts4 ,pott #hvo4 ,half linen1 gilt top1 #cs4 #f;d4 net4 ,second ,edition4 ,,mitchell1 ,,prof4 ,h4 ,g4 ,the ,world before ,abraham4 ,according to ,genesis i4-xi4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 net4 ,,psalms4 ,see #8,books of the ,bible4' ,,ryley1 ,g4 ,,buchanan1 and ,j4 ,m4 ,m',,candlish4 ,scotland's ,free ,church4 ,see page #aa4 ,,st4 ,,john4 ,,st4 ,,luke4 ,see #8,books of the ,bible4' ,,st4 ,,mark4 ,,st4 ,,matthew4 ,,sinclair1 ,,ven4 ,,archdeacon1 ,d4,d4 ,simplicity in ,christ4 ,sermons preached in ,st4 ,paul's ,cathedral and elsewhere4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,skrine1 ,j4 ,,huntley4 ,a ,goodly ,heritage4 ,sermons4 ,crown #hvo4 ,cloth1 #bs4 #f;d4 ,,sneath1 ,e4 ,,hershey1 ,ph4,d4 7,professor of ,philosophy in ,yale ,university74 ,the ,mind of ,tennyson4 ,his ,thoughts on ,god1 ,freedom1 and ,immortality4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 net4 ,,wilson1 ,j4 ,m41 ,m4,a4 7,archdeacon of ,manchester74 ,truths ,new and ,old4 ,sermons4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,wilson1 ,,sarah4 ,the ,romance of our ,ancient ,churches4 ,with about #bjj ,illustrations by ,,alexander ,,ansted4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 99 99 99 99 99 ,fiction4 #8,,alien1' ,author of #8,daughter of the ,king1' etc41 etc4 ,another ,woman's ,territory4 #bnd ,edition4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,andom1 ,r4 7,author of #8,we ,three and ,troddles'71 and ,,harewood1 ,,fred4 ,the ,fortune of a ,spendthrift and other ,items4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,anon4 ,all ,expenses ,paid4 ,fcap4 #hvo4 #bs4 #f;d4 net4 ---- ,muggleton ,college3 ,its ,rise and ,fall4 ,fcap4 #hvo4 ,paper1 #as4 ,,argyll1 ,,duke ,,of4 ,adventures in ,legend4 ,illustrated by ,,fairfax ,,muckley and ,,harrison ,,miller4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,bates1 ,,arlo4 ,the ,puritans4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,berthet1 ,e4 ,the ,catacombs of ,paris4 ,a ,thrilling ,story of ,life in ,paris during the #ahth ,century4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,bidder1 ,m4 ,in the ,shadow of the ,crown4 ,with an ,introduction by ,,maurice ,,hewlett4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,second ,edition4 ,,bower1 ,,marian4 ,the ,puppet ,show4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,bryden1 ,h4 ,a41 ,author of #8,gun and ,camera in ,south ,africa4' ,tales of ,south ,africa4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,cairnes1 ,,captain ,w4 ,e4 ,the ,coming ,waterloo4 #dth ,edition4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,describes an imaginary campaign against a ,continental ,power1 and gives an exposition of the use of modern arms and appliances in warfare4 ,a sketch map of the scene of operations is included in the volume4 ,,capes1 ,,bernard4 ,author of #8,the ,lake of ,wine1' etc4 ,love like a ,gipsy4 ,crown #hvo4 ,cloth1 #fs4 ,,carmichael1 ,m4 ,sketches and ,stories1 ,grave and ,gay4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,chambers1 ,r4 ,w41 ,author of #8,ashes of ,empire1' #8,the ,king in ,yellow1' etc4 ,cardigan4 ,crown #hvo4 ,cloth1 #fs4 ,,charles1 ,,joseph ,f4 ,a ,statesman's ,chance4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,charrington1 ,,charles4 ,a ,sturdy ,beggar and ,lady ,bramber's ,ghost4 ,two ,stories4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,cooper1 ,e4 ,h41 ,author of #8,mr4 ,blake of ,newmarket4' ,the ,enemies4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,cornish1 ,f4 ,,warre4 ,sunningwell4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,second ,edition4 ,,coxon1 ,,ethel4 ,within ,bounds4 ,cr4 #hvo4 #fs4 ,,dale1 ,t4 ,f4 7,stoneclink71 and ,,slaughter1 ,f4 ,e4 7,trant74 ,two ,fortunes and ,old ,patch4 ,a ,sporting ,novel4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,darnley1 ,,the ,,countess ,,of1 and ,r4 ,ll4 ,,hodgson4 ,elma ,trevor4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,denny1 ,,charles ,e4 ,the ,failure of the ,wanderer4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,doyle1 ,c4 ,w4 ,the ,taming of the ,jungle4 ,bound in a cover specially designed by ,j4 ,t4 ,,nettleship4 ,fcap4 #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ---- ,the ,shadow of ,quong ,lung4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,flowerdew1 ,,herbert1 ,author of #8,the ,celibate's ,wife1' and #8,the ,realist4' ,retaliation4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,forbes-,,robertson1 ,,frances4 ,the ,potentate4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ---- ,odd ,stories4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,ford1 ,,paul ,,leicester4 ,janice ,meredith4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ---- ,the ,story of an ,untold ,love4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,third ,edition4 ---- ,tattle ,tales of ,cupid4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,glasgow1 ,,ellen1 ,author of #8,the ,voice of a ,people1' etc4 ,the ,battle ,ground4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,gwynn1 ,,paul4 ,marta4 ,a ,novel4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,hannan1 ,,charles1 ,f4,r4,g4,s4 ,chin-,chin-,wa4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,harris1 ,,joel ,,chandler 7,uncle ,remus74 ,sister ,jane4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,hewlett1 ,,maurice4 ,author of #8,the ,forest ,lovers1' #8,richard ,yea or ,nay4' ,new ,canterbury ,tales4 ,crown #hvo4 ,cloth1 #fs4 ,,hutten1 ,,baroness ,,von4 ,marr'd in ,making4 ,photogravure ,frontispiece4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,james1 ,,henry4 ,the ,wings of the ,dove4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,johnston1 ,,mary4 ,by ,order of the ,company4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,tenth ,edition4 ,,johnston1 ,,mary4 ,the ,old ,dominion4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,seventh ,edition4 ---- ,audrey4 ,with ,illustrations in ,colour by ,f4 ,c4 ,,yohn4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,kingsley1 ,,charles4 ,westward ,ho6 ,fully ,illustrated and ,edited with an ,introduction by ,g4 ,,laurence ,,gomme1 ,f4,s4,a4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,lafargue1 ,,philip4 ,stephen ,brent4 #b vols4 ,crown #hvo4 #abs4 ---- ,the ,salt of the ,earth4 ,crown #hvo4 #bs4 #f;d4 ,,le ,,goffic1 ,,charles4 ,the ,dark ,way of ,love4 ,translated by ,e4 ,,wingate ,,rinder4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,loti1 ,,pierre4 ,impressions4 ,translated from the ,french4 ,with an ,introduction by ,,henry ,,james4 ,fcap4 #dto4 ,half vellum1 gilt4 #ajs4 #f;d4 ,,love ,,of ,,an ,,obsolete ,,woman4 ,chronicled by ,herself4 ,fcap4 #hvo4 ,cloth gilt1 #bs4 #f;d4 ,,lover1 ,,samuel4 ,the ,stories of4 ,centenary ,edition4 ,edited with ,introduction and ,notes by ,j4 ,t4 ,o',,donoghue4 ,large ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 per vol4 ,vol4 #a4 ,handy ,andy4 8 #b4 ,rory ,o',more4 8 #c4 ,treasure ,trove2 or1 #8,he would be a ,gentleman4' 8 #d4 ,legends and ,stories of ,ireland 7#ast ,series74 8 #e4 ,legends and ,stories of ,ireland 7#bnd ,series74 8 #f4 ,further ,stories of ,ireland4 ,the last volume includes ,stories which have never been previously collected1 completing the issue4 ,,lytton1 ,,lord4 ,harold1 the ,last of the ,saxons4 ,fully ,illustrated and edited with an ,introduction by ,g4 ,,laurence ,,gomme1 ,f4,s4,a4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,macfarlane1 ,,charles4 ,the ,camp of ,refuge4 ,fully ,illustrated and edited with an ,introduction by ,g4 ,,laurence ,,gomme1 ,f4,s4,a4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ---- ,reading ,abbey4 ,fully ,illustrated and edited with an ,introduction by ,g4 ,,laurence ,,gomme1 ,f4,s4,a4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,machray1 ,,robert1 ,author of #8,the ,vision ,splendid1' ,sir ,hector3 ,the ,story of a ,scots ,gentleman4 ,crown #hvo4 ,cloth1 #fs4 ,,macilwaine1 ,,herbert ,c4 ,fate the ,fiddler4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ---- ,dinkinbar4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,second ,edition4 ,,macleod1 ,,fiona4 ,the ,dominion of ,dreams4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,fourth ,edition4 ---- ,the ,laughter of ,peterkin4 ,illustrated by ,,sunderland ,,rollinson4 ,large ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ---- ,green ,fire4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,mc,i,l,w,r,a,i,t,h1 ,,jean1 part ,author of #8,the ,span of ,life4' ,the ,curious ,career of ,robert ,campbell4 ,illustrated by ,,frank ,,schoonover4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,mc,l,a,w,s1 ,,lafayette4 ,when the ,land was ,young4 ,illustrated by ,,will ,,crauford4 ,crown #hvo4 ,cloth1 #fs4 ,,mason1 ,a4 ,e4 ,w41 ,author of #8,miranda of the ,balcony1' etc4 ,ensign ,knightley1 and other ,stories4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,meredith1 ,,george4 ,the ,novels of4 ,library ,edition4 ,complete in #ae vols41 with ,photogravure ,frontispiece to each4 ,cr4 #hvo4 #fs4 each4 ,,meredith1 ,,george4 ,the ,novels of4 ,in #ae ,volumes4 ,pocket ,edition4 ,printed on thin opaque paper1 specially manufactured for this edition1 bound in red cloth1 gilt lettered on back and side1 gilt top4 #bs4 #f;d4 net per volume1 or #cs4 #f;d4 net in full leather per volume4 ,,the ,,ordeal ,,of ,,richard ,,feverel4 ,,rhoda ,,fleming4 ,,sandra ,,belloni4 ,,vittoria4 ,,diana ,,of ,,the ,,crossways4 ,,the ,,adventures ,,of ,,harry ,,richmond4 ,,beauchamp',s ,,career4 ,,the ,,egoist4 ,,the ,,tragic ,,comedians4 ,,evan ,,harrington4 ,,short ,,stories3--,the ,tale of ,chloe4 ,the ,house on the ,beach4 ,farina4 ,the ,case of ,general ,ople and ,lady ,camper4 ,,the ,,shaving ,,of ,,shagpat4 ,,the ,,amazing ,,marriage4 ,,one ,,of ,,our ,,conquerors4 ,,lord ,,ormont ,,and ,,his ,,aminta4 ,,an ,,essay ,,on ,,comedy4 ,uniform with the ,library ,edition of the ,novels of ,,george ,,meredith4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,tale ,,of ,,chloe4 ,pocket ,edition4 #cs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,the ,,story ,,of ,,bhanavar4 ,pocket ,edition4 #cs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,merejkowski1 ,,dmitri4 ,the ,death of the ,gods4 ,translated by ,,herbert ,,trench1 late ,fellow of ,all ,souls4 ,crown #hvo4 ,cloth1 #fs4 ---- ,the ,resurrection of the ,gods4 ,translated by ,,herbert ,,trench4 ,crown #hvo4 ,cloth1 #fs4 ,,montague1 ,,charles4 ,the ,vigil4 ,a ,romance of ,zulu ,life4 ,with #ad full-page ,illustrations by ,a4 ,d4 ,m',,cormick4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,mowbray1 ,j4 ,p4 ,a ,journey to ,nature4 ,coloured end papers1 and specially designed head and tail pieces4 ,demy #hvo4 #gs4 #f;d4 net4 ---- ,the ,making of a ,country ,home4 ,illustrated by ,,charles ,e4 ,,hooper4 ,demy #hvo4 #fs4 net4 ,,newman1 ,,mrs4 ,his ,vindication4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,parker1 ,,nella4 ,dramas of ,to-day4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,payne1 ,,will1 ,author of #8,jerry the ,dreamer1' etc4 ,the ,story of ,eva4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,penrose1 ,,mrs4 ,h4 ,h4 ,the ,modern ,gospel4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,perks1 ,,mrs4 ,,hartley1 ,author of #8,from ,heather ,hills4' ,among the ,bracken4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,pickering1 ,,sidney4 ,the ,romance of his ,picture4 ,crown #hvo4 #bs4 #f;d4 ,,prichard1 ,k4 ,,hesketh1 ,joint ,authors of #8,a ,modern ,mercenary4' ,karadac4 ,with ,photogravure ,frontispiece4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,reed1 ,,marcus4 #8,pride of ,england4' ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 #8,,rita1' ,author of #8,peg the ,rake1' #8,petticoat ,loose1' etc4 ,the ,sin of ,jasper ,standish4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,russell1 ,w4 ,,clark1 ,author of #8,john ,holdsworth1 ,chief ,mate1' #8,wreck of the ,grosvenor1' etc4 ,the ,ship's ,adventure4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,scott1 ,,sir ,,walter4 ,the ,waverley ,novels4 ,the favourite ,edition of ,sir ,walter ,scott4 ,a ,facsimile of the ,edition of #ahbi published by ,cadell ,co4 ,with all the original ,plates after ,sir ,,david ,,wilkie1 ,r4,a42 ,sir ,,edwin ,,landseer1 ,r4,a42 ,c4 ,r4 ,,leslie1 ,r4,a42 ,,clarkson ,,stanfield1 ,r4,a41 etc4 7re-engraved74 ,in #dh vols4 ,fcap4 #hvo4 ,cloth1 paper label title1 #as4 #f;d4 net per volume1 or #c #abs4 net the set4 ,also cloth gilt1 gilt top1 #bs4 net per volume1 or #d #afs4 net the set2 and half leather1 gilt1 #bs4 #f;d4 net per volume1 or #f net the set4 ,,setoun1 ,,gabriel1 ,author of #8,robert ,urquhart1' #8,barncraig1' etc4 ,the ,skipper of ,barncraig4 ,crown #hvo4 ,cloth1 #fs4 ,,sharp1 ,,william4 ,madge o' the ,pool4 ,fcap4 #hvo4 #bs4 #f;d4 ,,sinclair1 ,,may1 ,author of #8,audrey ,craven' and #8,mr4 and ,mrs4 ,nevill ,tyson4' ,two ,sides of a ,question4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 #bnd ,edition4 ,,smith1 ,f4 ,,hopkinson1 ,author of #8,tom ,grogan1' etc4 ,caleb ,west1 ,master ,diver4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,second ,edition4 ,,soane1 ,,john4 ,the ,quest of ,mr4 ,east4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,steel1 ,,flora ,,annie4 ,in the ,tideway4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,stoker1 ,,bram4 ,dracula4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,sixth ,edition4 ,,stoker1 ,,bram4 ,the ,shoulder of ,shasta4 ,crown #hvo4 ,cloth1 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,street1 ,g4 ,s41 ,author of #8,the ,autobiography of a ,boy1' etc4 ,a ,book of ,stories4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,sturgis1 ,,julian4 ,the ,folly of ,pen ,harrington4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ---- ,stephen ,calinari4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,thorburn1 ,s4 ,s4 ,his ,majesty's ,greatest ,subject4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,tynan1 ,,katharine1 ,author of #8,the ,dear ,irish ,girl1' etc41 etc4 ,that ,sweet ,enemy4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 #bnd ,edition4 ,,white1 ,,percy4 ,the ,west ,end4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,white1 ,,stewart ,e4 ,the ,westerners4 ,crown #hvo4 ,cloth1 #fs4 ---- ,the ,blazed ,trail4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 #8,,zack1' ,author of #8,life is ,life' and #8,on ,trial4' ,the ,white ,cottage4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 99 99 99 99 99 ,poetry4 ,,allen1 ,,rev4 ,g4 ,c4 ,tales from ,tennyson4 #cs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,armstrong1 ,,arthur ,,coles4 ,a ,tale from ,boccaccio1 and other ,poems4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 net4 ,,barmby1 ,,beatrice ,,helen4 ,gisli ,sursson4 ,a ,drama4 ,ballads and ,poems of the ,old ,norse ,days1 with some ,translations4 ,with an ,introduction by ,f4 ,,york ,,powell4 ,cr4 #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,battersby1 ,,caryl4 ,the ,song of the ,golden ,bough4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,baughan1 ,b4 ,e4 ,verses4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 ,,bidder1 ,,george4 ,by ,southern ,shore4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 ---- ,merlin's ,youth4 ,paper1 #as4 ,also cloth1 #es4 ,,browning1 ,,robert4 ,men and ,women4 ,a limited ,edition1 printed on hand-made paper1 and bound in half vellum4 ,in #b vols41 #afmo1 with ,photogravure ,frontispiece to each4 #fs4 net the #b vols4 ,,campbell1 ,,james ,,dykes4 ,coleridge's ,poems4 ,a ,facsimile ,reproduction of the ,proofs and ,,mss4 of some of the ,poems4 ,edited by ,,james ,,dykes ,,campbell4 ,with ,preface and ,notes by ,w4 ,,hale ,,white4 ,edition limited to #bej copies1 #fs4 net4 ,large ,paper edition of #ej copies1 #abs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,doughty1 ,,charles4 ,under ,arms1 #aijj4 ,price #as4 net4 ,,dryden1 ,,john4 ,aureng-,zebe3 ,a ,tragedy4 ,,somerville1 ,,william4 ,the ,chace3 ,a ,poem4 ,edited by ,,kenneth ,,deighton4 ,in one volume4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 net4 ,,gale1 ,,norman4 ,a ,country ,muse4 ,first and ,second ,series4 ,a new ,edition containing additional ,poems4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 each volume4 ---- ,cricket ,songs4 ,third ,edition4 ,fcap4 #hvo4 ,paper1 #as4 ,,gardner1 ,,edmund4 ,dante's ,ten ,heavens4 ,a ,study in the #8,paradiso4' ,demy #hvo4 #abs4 ,second ,edition4 ---- and ,,philip ,h4 ,,wicksteed1 ,m4,a4 ,dante and ,giovanni del ,vergilio4 ,including a ,critical ,edition of the text of ,dante's #8,eclog ,latin1' and of the poetic remains of ,giovanni del ,vergilio4 ,demy #hvo4 ,,gemmer1 ,c4 ,m4 ,fidelis and other ,poems4 ,fcap4 #hvo4 ,cloth1 #cs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,graham1 ,,david4 ,rizzio4 ,an ,historical ,tragedy4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 net4 ---- ,darnley4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 net4 ,,meredith1 ,,george4 ,a ,reading of ,life and other ,poems4 ,buckram4 ,crown #hvo1 #fs4 net4 ---- ,poems4 #b vols4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 each4 ,uniform with the ,library ,edition of the ,works of ,,george ,,meredith4 ,,meredith1 ,,george4 ,selected ,poems4 ,crown #hvo4 ,buckram1 #fs4 net4 ---- ,selected ,poems4 ,pocket ,edition4 ,bound in half vellum4 #afmo4 #cs4 #f;d4 net4 ---- ,odes in ,contribution to the ,song of ,french ,history4 ,the ,revolution1 ,napolon1 ,alsace-,lorraine4 ,crown #hvo4 ,buckram1 #fs4 net4 ---- ,the ,nature ,poems of4 ,with #bj full-page ,photogravure ,drawings by ,,william ,,hyde4 ,printed on handmade paper4 ,edition limited to #cej copies4 #b #abs4 #f;d4 net4 ,also #aej copies on large paper1 #e #es4 net4 ,,mills1 ,e4 ,j4 ,my ,only ,child4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 ,,nesbit1 ,e4 ,songs of ,love and ,empire4 ,cloth gilt4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 ,,piatt1 ,,john ,,james4 ,the ,ghost's ,entry1 and other ,poems4 ,cloth gilt4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 ,,piatt1 ,,mrs4 ,child ,world ,ballads4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 ,,prema-,,sagara2 ,,or1 ,,the ,,ocean ,,of ,,love4 ,translated from the ,hindi by ,f4 ,,pincott4 ,demy #hvo4 #aes4 net4 ,,rait1 ,,robert ,s4 ,a ,royal ,rhetorician4 ,a ,treatise on ,scottis ,poesie4 ,a ,counterblaste to ,tobacco1 etc41 etc4 ,by ,,king ,,james ,,vi4 and ,i4 ,edited with an ,introduction by ,,robert ,s4 ,,rait1 ,fellow of ,new ,college1 ,oxford4 #cs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,rait1 ,,robert ,s4 ,poems of ,montrose and ,marvell4 ,edited by ,,robert ,s4 ,,rait4 #afmo1 half parchment4 #bs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,rogers1 ,,alexander4 ,the ,widowed ,queen2 or1 ,the ,rhani of ,jhansi4 ,a ,play4 ,with an ,introduction by ,,sir ,,edwin ,,arnold4 ,fcap4 #hvo4 #es4 ,,shakespeare1 ,,william4 ,illustrated ,edition of the ,works of4 ,in #bj ,imperial #afmo ,volumes with coloured title-page and end-papers designed by ,,lewis ,f4 ,,day1 and a specially designed coloured illustration to each ,play1 the artists being3 ,l4 ,,leslie ,,brooke1 ,,byam ,,shaw1 ,,henry ,j4 ,,ford1 ,g4 ,p4 ,,jacomb ,,hood1 ,w4 ,d4 ,,eden1 ,,estelle ,,nathan1 ,,eleanor ,f4 ,,brickdale1 ,,patten ,,wilson1 ,,robert ,,sauber1 ,,john ,d4 ,,batten1 ,,gerald ,,moira1 and ,,frank ,c4 ,,cowper4 ,the title-page and illustrations printed on ,japanese vellum4 ,cloth gilt1 extra1 gilt top1 gilt back1 with headband and bookmarker1 #bs4 #f;d4 net per volume1 or #b #ajs4 the set4 ,each volume sold separately4 ,,skrine1 ,j4 ,,huntley4 ,songs of the ,maid4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 ,,spenser1 ,,edmund4 ,the ,faerie ,queene4 ,complete in ,six ,volumes4 ,fcap4 #hvo4 ,cloth1 #is4 net4 ,edited by ,,kate ,m4 ,,warren4 #as4 #f;d4 net each4 ,also ,art ,canvas1 gilt extra1 with ,photogravure ,frontispiece1 #bs4 #f;d4 net per vol42 complete in case1 #aes4 net4 ,,stanton1 ,,frank ,l4 ,songs of the ,soil4 ,with a ,preface by ,,joel ,,chandler ,,harris 7,,uncle ,,remus74 ,fcap4 #hvo4 #es4 net4 ,,stevenson1 ,,wallace4 ,some ,songs and ,verses4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 net4 ,,thompson1 ,,francis4 ,new ,poems4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 net4 ,,thomson1 ,,james4 ,poems4 ,by ,,james ,,thomson1 ,weaver of ,kenleith4 ,demy #hvo4 #gs4 #f;d4 ,,vialls1 ,m4 ,a4 ,music ,fancies4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 net4 ,,wicksteed1 ,,philip ,h41 ,m4,a41 and ,,edmund ,g4 ,,gardner1 ,m4,a4 ,dante and ,giovanni del ,vergilio4 ,including a ,critical ,edition of the text of ,dante's #8,eclog ,latin1' and of the poetic remains of ,giovanni del ,vergilio4 ,demy #hvo4 #abs4 ,,wilson1 ,,robert4 ,laurel ,leaves4 ,crown #hvo4 #es4 99 99 99 99 99 ,books for the ,young4 ,,allen1 ,,rev4 ,g4 ,c41 ,m4,a4 7,head ,master of ,cranleigh ,school74 ,tales from ,tennyson4 ,with two ,photogravures4 ,crown #hvo4 #cs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,argyll1 ,,duke ,,of4 ,adventures in ,legend4 ,tales of the ,west ,highlands4 ,with numerous ,illustrations by ,,harrison ,,miller and ,,fairfax ,,muckley4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,bankes1 ,,roden4 ,a ,story ,book for ,lesson ,time4 ,cloth1 crown #hvo4 #as4 ,,gale1 ,,norman4 ,cricket ,songs4 ,fcap4 #hvo4 ,paper1 #as4 ,third ,edition4 ,,gomme1 ,g4 ,,laurence4 ,books edited by4 ---- ,the ,king's ,story ,book4 ,illustrated by ,,harrison ,,miller4 ---- ,the ,queen's ,story ,book4 ,illustrated by ,w4 ,h4 ,,robinson4 ---- ,the ,prince's ,story ,book4 ,illustrated by ,h4 ,s4 ,,banks4 ---- ,the ,princess's ,story ,book4 ,illustrated by ,,helen ,,stratton4 ,historical ,stories collected out of ,english ,romantic ,literature1 in illustration of the ,reigns of ,english ,monarchs from the ,conquest to ,queen ,victoria4 ,new ,editions of each of these ,story ,books are in preparation4 ,harold3 ,the ,last of the ,saxons4 ,by ,,lord ,,lytton4 ,crown #hvo4 ,illustrated4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,the ,camp of ,refuge4 ,by ,,charles ,,macfarlane4 ,crown #hvo4 ,illustrated4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,westward ,ho6 ,by ,,charles ,,kingsley4 ,crown #hvo4 ,illustrated4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,reading ,abbey4 ,by ,,charles ,,macfarlane4 ,crown #hvo4 ,illustrated4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,harris1 ,,joel ,,chandler 7,uncle ,remus74 ,sister ,jane1 ,her ,friends and ,acquaintances4 ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,macleod1 ,,fiona4 ,the ,laughter of ,peterkin4 ,a ,re-telling of ,old ,stories of the ,celtic ,wonder-,world4 ,illustrated by ,,sunderland ,,rollinson4 ,large ,crown #hvo4 #fs4 ,,paine1 ,,albert ,,bigelow4 ,the ,hollow ,tree4 ,illustrated by ,j4 ,m4 ,,cond4 ,bound in coloured boards4 #dto4 #cs4 #f;d4 ,,singing ,,time4 ,a ,child's ,song ,book4 ,music by ,,arthur ,,somervell4 ,drawings by ,l4 ,,leslie ,,brooke4 ,square #dto4 #es4 99 99 99 99 99 ,,index ,,to ,,authors ,addison1 ,joseph1 #bb4 #8,alien1' #cc4 ,allen1 ,rev4 ,g4 ,c41 #db4 ,andom1 ,r41 #cc4 ,anitchkow1 ,michael1 #c4 ,anon41 #c1 #cc4 ,arber1 ,professor ,edward1 #bb-be4 ,argyll1 ,duke of1 #cc4 ,armstrong1 ,arthur ,coles1 #db4 ,arnold1 ,t4 ,w41 #c4 ,arnold1 ,sir ,edwin1 #de4 ,ascham1 ,roger1 #bb1 #bc4 ,bacon1 ,lord1 #bc4 ,bain1 ,r4 ,nisbet1 #c4 ,ballin1 ,mrs4 ,a41 #bf4 ,bankes1 ,roden1 #bf4 ,barmby1 ,beatrice ,helen1 #db4 ,barnfield1 ,richard1 #be4 ,bartholomew1 ,j4 ,g41 ,f4,r4,g4,s41 #ad4 ,bates1 ,arlo1 #cc4 ,battersby1 ,caryl1 #db4 ,battye1 ,a4 ,trevor-1 ,f4,l4,s41 #ad4 ,baughan1 ,b4 ,e41 #db4 ,bayley1 ,sir ,steuart ,colvin1 #g4 ,beatty1 ,william1 ,m4,d41 #c4 ,beaumont1 ,worby1 #bf4 ,berthet1 ,e41 #cc4 ,bertram1 ,james1 #d4 ,bidder1 ,george1 #db4 ,bidder1 ,m41 #cc4 ,birdwood1 ,sir ,george1 ,m4,d41 ,k4,c4,i4,e41 ,c4,s4,i41 ,,ll4,d41 #ae4 ,birrell1 ,augustine1 ,q4,c41 ,m4,p41 #d4 ,black1 ,c4 ,e4 ,d41 #aj4 ,blount1 ,bertram1 #bf4 ,bonavia1 ,emmanuel1 ,m4,d41 #bf4 ,boswell1 ,james1 #d4 ,bower1 ,marian1 #cc4 ,brabant1 ,arthur ,baring1 #aj4 ,bradley1 ,a4 ,g41 #d4 ,brame1 ,j4 ,s4 ,s41 #bh4 ,bright1 ,charles1 ,f4,r4,s4,e41 #d4 ,bright1 ,edward ,brailston1 ,c4,e41 #d4 ,brownell1 ,w4 ,c41 #bj4 ,browning1 ,robert1 #db4 ,bryden1 ,h4 ,a41 #cc4 ,burroughs1 ,john1 #e4 ,cairnes1 ,capt4 ,w4 ,e41 #cc4 ,campbell1 ,james ,dykes1 #db4 ,campbell1 ,lord ,archibald1 #e4 ,capes1 ,bernard1 #cc4 ,carmichael1 ,m41 #cd4 ,caxton1 ,william1 #bd4 #8,centurion1' #e4 ,chailley-,bert1 ,j41 #e4 ,chamberlain1 ,rt4 ,hon4 ,joseph1 ,m4,p41 ,d4,c4,l41 ,,ll4,d41 #e4 ,chambers1 ,r4 ,w41 #cd4 ,charles1 ,joseph ,f41 #cd4 ,charrington1 ,charles1 #cd4 ,coldstream1 ,j4 ,p41 #bf4 ,cole1 ,alan ,s41 #bj4 ,collins1 ,j4 ,churton1 #e4 ,conway1 ,sir ,william ,martin1 #ad4 ,cooper1 ,bishop ,thomas1 #be4 ,cooper1 ,e4 ,h41 #cd4 ,cornish1 ,f4 ,warre1 #cd4 ,courtney1 ,w4 ,l41 #e4 ,coxon1 ,ethel1 #cd4 ,cunynghame1 ,henry1 #bj4 ,currie1 ,maj4-,gen4 ,fendall1 #e4 ,curzon1 ,the ,right ,hon4 ,george ,n4 7,lord ,curzon of ,kedleston71 #e4 ,dale1 ,t4 ,f4 7,stoneclink71 #ag1 #cd4 ,daniell1 ,a4 ,e41 #bj1 #ca4 ,danvers1 ,fred4 ,charles1 #g4 ,darnley1 ,countess of1 #cd4 ,davidson1 ,thomas1 #f4 ,decker1 ,thomas1 #bd4 ,deighton1 ,kenneth1 #f4 ,de ,bury1 ,mlle4 ,blaze1 #f4 ,denny1 ,charles ,e41 #cd4 ,dinsmore1 ,charles ,a41 #f4 ,doughty1 ,charles1 #dc4 ,doyle1 ,c4 ,w41 #cd4 ,dryden1 ,john1 #dc4 ,duff1 ,c4 ,m41 #f4 ,durand1 ,lady1 #ae4 ,dutt1 ,r4 ,c41 ,c4,i4,e41 #f4 ,earle1 ,alice ,morse1 #ab4 ,earle1 ,john1 #bb4 ,elliott1 ,robert ,h41 #ae4 ,englehardt1 ,a4 ,p41 #ae4 ,filippi1 ,filippo de1 #ae4 ,fish1 ,simon1 #bd4 ,flowerdew1 ,herbert1 #ce4 ,forbes-,robertson1 ,frances1 #ce4 ,ford1 ,paul ,leicester1 #ce4 ,fox1 ,arthur ,w41 #f4 ,gairdner1 ,james1 #f4 ,gale1 ,norman1 #dc4 ,gall1 ,john1 ,m4,a41 ,,ll4,b41 #bg4 ,gardner1 ,edmund1 #dc4 ,gascoigne1 ,george1 #bb4 ,gemmer1 ,c4 ,m41 #dc4 ,glasgow1 ,ellen1 #ce4 ,godkin1 ,e4 ,l41 #f1 #g4 ,goffic1 ,charles le1 #cf4 ,gomme1 ,g4 ,laurence1 #g1 #cf1 #cg1 #dg4 ,googe1 ,barnabe1 #bc4 ,gosson1 ,stephen1 #bb4 ,graham1 ,david1 #dc4 ,granby1 ,marchioness of1 #bj4 ,greene1 ,robert1 ,m4,a41 #bd4 ,gribble1 ,francis1 #g4 ,guillemard1 ,dr4 ,f4 ,h4 ,h41 #af4 ,gwynn1 ,paul1 #ce4 ,habington1 ,william1 #bc4 ,hackel1 ,eduard1 #bg4 ,hake1 ,a4 ,egmont1 #g4 ,hanna1 ,col4 ,h4 ,b41 #g1 #ah4 ,hannan1 ,charles1 ,f4,r4,g4,s41 #ce4 ,harald1 ,j4 ,h41 #ca4 ,harewood1 ,fred41 #cc4 ,harris1 ,joel ,chandler 7,uncle ,remus71 #ce4 ,hayden1 ,e4 ,g41 #g4 ,hewitt1 ,j4 ,f41 #g4 ,hewlett1 ,maurice1 #ce4 ,hodgson1 ,r4 ,ll41 #ae1 #cd4 ,holden1 ,ed4 ,s41 ,,ll4,d41 #h4 ,holland1 ,clive1 #bg4 ,hope1 ,w4 ,h4 ,st4 ,john1 #h1 #bj4 ,houfe1 ,c4 ,a41 #h4 ,howell1 ,james1 #bc4 ,hunter1 ,sir ,w4 ,w41 #h4 ,hutten1 ,baroness von1 #ce4 ,hyde1 ,william1 #ba4 ,irwin1 ,sidney ,t41 #h4 ,james1 ,henry1 #ce1 #cf4 ,james1 ,king1 the ,first1 #bc4 ,james1 ,william1 #h4 ,jardine1 ,hon4 ,mr4 ,justice1 #af4 ,johnston1 ,mary1 #ce1 #cf4 ,joy1 ,george1 #be4 ,kennedy1 ,admiral1 #ag4 ,kingsley1 ,charles1 #cf4 ,knox1 ,john1 #bd4 ,krehbiel1 ,henry ,e41 #h4 ,lachambre1 ,henri1 #ae4 ,lafargue1 ,philip1 #cf4 ,lane-,poole1 ,stanley1 #h4 ,latimer1 ,hugh1 #bb4 ,leach1 ,a4 ,f41 ,m4,a41 #h1 #bg4 ,leaf1 ,cecil ,h41 ,m4,a41 #bg4 ,leaf1 ,h4 ,m41 ,m4,i4,e4,e41 #bg4 ,legg1 ,l4 ,g4 ,wickham1 #h1 #ba4 ,lever1 ,rev4 ,thomas1 #bc4 ,lewes1 ,vivian ,b41 #bh4 ,loti1 ,pierre1 #cf4 ,lover1 ,samuel1 #cf4 ,lyly1 ,john1 #bb4 ,lytton1 ,lord1 #cf4 ,macfarlane1 ,charles1 #cg4 ,mac,george1 ,g4 ,w41 #h4 ,machuron1 ,alexis1 #ae4 ,mac,ilwaine1 ,herbert ,c41 #cg4 ,macleod1 ,fiona1 #cg1 #dh4 ,mac,nair1 ,major ,j4 ,f4 ,a41 #i4 ,machray1 ,robert1 #cg4 ,madge1 ,h4 ,d41 ,rev41 #ca4 ,marprelate1 ,martin1 #bd4 ,mason1 ,a4 ,e4 ,w41 #cg4 ,masterman1 ,n41 #i4 ,mayo1 ,john ,horsley1 #ah4 ,m',candlish1 ,j4 ,m41 #aj4 ,mc,ilwraith1 ,jean1 #cg4 ,mc,laws1 ,lafayette1 #cg4 ,meakin1 ,a4 ,m4 ,b41 #af4 ,meredith1 ,george1 #i1 #ba1 #cg1 #ch1 #dc4 ,merejkowski1 ,dmitri1 #ch4 ,metcalfe1 ,charles ,theophilus1 ,c4,s4,i41 #i4 ,meynell1 ,alice1 #ba4 ,mills1 ,e4 ,j41 #dd4 ,milton1 ,john1 #bb4 ,mitchell1 ,h4 ,g41 #cb4 ,monier-,williams1 ,sir ,m41 ,k4,c4,i4,e41 #g4 ,monk of ,evesham1 ,a1 #bc4 ,montague1 ,charles1 #ci4 ,more1 ,sir ,thomas1 #bb4 ,morison1 ,m41 #i1 #bh4 ,morison1 ,theodore1 #i4 ,mowbray1 ,j4 ,p41 #ci4 ,mnsterberg1 ,hugo1 #i4 ,nansen1 ,fridtjof1 #af4 ,naunton1 ,sir ,robert1 #bc4 ,nesbit1 ,e41 #dd4 ,newberry1 ,percy ,e41 #aj1 #ba4 ,newman1 ,mrs41 #ci4 ,nisbet1 ,john1 #aj4 ,o',donoghue1 ,j4 ,t41 #ef4 ,ookhtomsky1 ,prince ,e41 #af4 ,oppert1 ,gustav1 #aj4 ,paine1 ,albert ,bigelow1 #dh4 ,palmer1 ,walter1 ,m4,p41 #aj4 ,parker1 ,nella1 #ci4 ,payne1 ,will1 #ci4 ,peel1 ,mrs41 #bh4 ,penrose1 ,mrs4 ,h4 ,h41 #ci4 ,perks1 ,mrs4 ,hartley1 #ci4 ,piatt1 ,john ,james1 #dd4 ,piatt1 ,mrs41 #dd4 ,pickering1 ,sidney1 #ci4 ,pincott1 ,f41 #dd4 ,popowski1 ,joseph1 #aj4 ,powell1 ,f4 ,york1 #db4 ,prichard1 ,hesketh1 #af4 ,prichard1 ,k4 ,hesketh1 #ci4 ,puttenham1 ,george1 #bc4 ,rait1 ,r4 ,s41 #aj1 #dd1 #de4 ,raleigh1 ,sir ,walter1 #bc4 ,reed1 ,marcus1 #ci1 #eh4 ,rice1 ,louis1 #aj4 ,rinder1 ,e4 ,wingate1 #cf4 #8,rita1' #ci4 ,roberts1 ,morley1 #af4 ,robertson1 ,david1 #bg4 ,robinson1 ,clement1 #bd4 ,rogers1 ,alexander1 #de4 ,rogers1 ,c4 ,j41 #bh4 ,roosevelt1 ,theodore1 #aa4 ,round1 ,j4 ,horace1 ,m4,a41 #aa4 ,roy1 ,w41 #bc4 ,russell1 ,w4 ,clark1 #dj4 ,ryley1 ,rev4 ,j4 ,buchanan1 #aa1 #cb4 ,sangermano1 ,father1 #af4 ,sapte1 ,brand1 #g4 ,schweitzer1 ,georg1 #aa4 ,scott1 ,eva1 #aa4 ,scott1 ,sir ,walter1 #dj4 ,scrutton1 ,percy ,e41 #bh4 ,selden1 ,john1 #bb4 ,selfe1 ,rose ,e41 #ab4 ,setoun1 ,gabriel1 #dj4 ,shakespeare1 ,william1 #de4 ,sharp1 ,william1 #dj4 ,siborne1 ,captain ,william1 #aa1 #ah4 ,sichel1 ,edith1 #ab4 ,sidney1 ,sir ,philip1 #bb4 ,sinclair1 ,may1 #dj4 ,sinclair1 ,ven4 ,archdeacon1 ,d4,d41 #eb4 ,skrine1 ,j4 ,huntley1 #cb1 #de4 ,slaughter1 ,frances1 #cd4 ,smith1 ,edward1 #ab4 ,smith1 ,f4 ,hopkinson1 #dj4 ,smith1 ,captain ,john1 #be4 ,smythe1 ,a4 ,j41 #ab4 ,sneath1 ,e4 ,hershey1 #ab1 #cb4 ,soane1 ,john1 #dj4 ,somervell1 ,arthur1 #dh4 ,somerville1 ,william1 #dc4 ,spalding1 ,thomas ,alfred1 #ab1 #ah4 ,spenser1 ,edmund1 #de4 ,stadling1 ,j41 #af4 ,stanihurst1 ,richard1 #bd4 ,stanton1 ,frank ,l41 #de4 ,steel1 ,flora ,annie1 #dj4 ,stein1 ,m4 ,a41 #ab4 ,stevenson1 ,wallace1 #de4 ,stoker1 ,bram1 #dj1 #da4 ,stoneclink 7,t4 ,f4 ,dale71 #f1 #ag1 #cd4 ,street1 ,g4 ,s41 #ab1 #da4 ,stuart1 ,john1 #ab4 ,sturgis1 ,julian1 #da4 ,tarver1 ,j4 ,c41 #bi4 ,thompson1 ,francis1 #df4 ,thomson1 ,j4 ,j41 ,f4,r4,s41 #bi4 ,thomson1 ,james1 #df4 ,thorburn1 ,s4 ,s41 #da4 ,thornton1 ,surg4-,general1 ,c4,b41 #ac4 ,torrey1 ,joseph1 #bi4 ,tottel1 ,r41 #bc4 ,townsend1 ,meredith1 #ab4 ,traill1 ,h4 ,d41 #ac4 ,trench1 ,herbert1 #ch4 ,turner1 ,h4 ,h41 ,f4,r4,s41 #bi4 ,tynan1 ,katharine1 #da4 ,udall1 ,rev4 ,john1 #bd4 ,udall1 ,nicholas1 #bc4 ,vallery-,radot1 ,r41 #ac4 ,vibart1 ,colonel ,henry ,m41 #ac1 #ai4 ,villiers1 ,george1 #bb4 ,waddell1 ,surg4-,maj4 ,j4 ,a41 #af4 ,walker1 ,charles1 #ag4 ,warren1 ,kate ,m41 #bh1 #cj4 ,watson1 ,thomas4 #bc4 ,webb1 ,surgeon-,captain1 ,w4 ,w41 #cj4 ,webbe1 ,e41 #bb4 ,webbe1 ,william1 #bc4 ,wesslau1 ,o4 ,e41 #g4 ,white1 ,w4 ,hale1 #db4 ,white1 ,percy1 #da4 ,white1 ,stewart ,e41 #da4 ,whiteway1 ,r4 ,s41 #ac4 ,wicksteed1 ,rev4 ,p4 ,h41 #ac1 #dc4 ,wigram1 ,percy1 #g4 ,wilkinson1 ,spenser1 #ac1 #ah1 #ai4 ,wilson1 ,a4 ,j41 #ag4 ,wilson1 ,j4 ,m41 ,m4,a41 #cb4 ,wilson1 ,robert1 #df4 ,wilson1 ,sarah1 #cb4 ,winslow1 ,anna ,green1 #ac4 ,wood1 ,walter1 #ac4 ,young1 ,ernest1 #af4 #8,zack1' #da4 ,zimmermann1 ,dr4 ,a41 #ej4 99 99 99 99 99 ,a ,,catalogue ,,of ,,books ,,published ,,by ,archibald ,constable ,co4 ,ltd ,arranged in ,order of ,prices 999999,waverley ,novels4 ,see page #fd4 ,sidenote3 #as4 ,anon4 ,muggleton ,college4 ,bankes 7,roden7 ,a ,story ,book for ,lesson ,time4 ,bidder 7,george7 ,merlin's ,youth4 ,paper4 ,bright 7,charles7 ,science and ,engineering1 #ahcg-ig4 ,gale 7,norman7 ,cricket ,songs4 ,palmer 7,walter1 ,m4,p47 ,poultry ,management on a ,farm4 ,sidenote3 #as4 ,net4 ,philips 7,f4 ,c47 ,a ,full ,confession4 ,the ,books of the ,bible--,psalms1 ,st4 ,matthew1 ,st4 ,mark1 ,st4 ,luke1 ,st4 ,john4 ,cloth4 ,paper label4 ,the ,st4 ,george's ,kalendar1 #aijb4 ,sidenote3 #as4 #f;d4 ,net4 ,doughty 7,charles7 ,under ,arms1 #aijj4 ,scott 7,sir ,walter7 ,the ,waverley ,novels4 #dh ,volumes4 ,label4 ,per vol4 ,the ,books of the ,bible--,psalms1 ,st4 ,matthew1 ,st4 ,mark1 ,st4 ,luke1 ,st4 ,john4 ,cloth gilt4 ,warren 7,kate ,m47 ,spenser's ,faerie ,queene4 #f vols4 ,each4 ,sidenote3 #bs4 ,chamberlain 7,rt4 ,hon4 ,joseph1 ,m4,p47 ,patriotism4 ,buckram4 ,coldstream 7,john ,p47 ,institutions of ,austria4 ---- 8 8 ,italy4 ,sidenote3 #bs4 ,net4 ,scott 7,sir ,walter7 ,the ,waverley ,novels4 #dh vols4 ,cloth gilt4 ,per ,vol4 ,sidenote3 #bs4#f;d4 ,anon4 ,the ,love of an ,obsolete ,woman4 ,hanna 7,col4 ,h4 ,b47 ,backwards or ,forwards4 ---- ,can ,russia ,invade ,india8 ---- ,india's ,scientific ,frontier4 ,holland 7,clive7 ,the ,use of the ,hand ,camera4 ,houfe 7,c4 ,a47 ,the ,question of the ,houses4 ,james 7,william7 ,human ,immortality4 ,lafargue 7,philip7 ,the ,salt of the ,earth4 ,pickering 7,sidney7 ,the ,romance of his ,picture4 ,scrutton 7,percy ,e47 ,electricity in ,town and ,country ,houses4 ,sharp 7,william7 ,madge o' the ,pool4 ,skrine 7,j4 ,huntley7 ,a ,goodly ,heritage4 ,stoker 7,bram7 ,the ,shoulder of ,shasta4 ,wilkinson 7,spenser7 ,the ,brain of an ,army4 ---- ,lessons of the ,war4---- ---- ,the ,volunteers and the ,national ,defence4 ---- ,the ,command of the ,sea and the ,brain of the ,navy4 ,sidenote3 #bs4 #f;d4 ,net4 ,anon4 ,all ,expenses ,paid4 ,beatty 7,william1 ,m4,d47 ,an ,authentic ,narrative of the ,death of ,nelson4 ,four ,gospels4 ,cloth4 ,paper label4 ,meredith 7,george7 ,the ,novels of4 ,pocket ,edition4 #ae vols4 ,each4 ,rait 7,r4 ,s47 ,poems of ,montrose and ,marvell4 ,scott 7,sir ,walter7 ,the ,waverley ,novels4 #dh vols4 ,leather4 ,per vol4 ,shakespeare4 ,the ,works of4 ,illustrated4 #bj vols4 ,each4 ,the ,books of the ,bible--,psalms1 ,st4 ,matthew1 ,st4 ,mark1 ,st4 ,luke1 ,st4 ,john4 ,leather gilt4 ,walker 7,c47 ,amateur ,fish ,culture4 ,warren 7,kate ,m47 ,spenser's ,faerie ,queene4 ,cloth gilt4 #f vols4 ,each4 ,sidenote3 #cs4 ,net4 ,four ,gospels4 ,cloth gilt4 ,sidenote3 #cs4 #f;d4 ,andom 7,r47 and ,harewood 7,f47 ,the ,fortune of a ,spendthrift4 ,anon4 ,muggleton ,college4 ,cloth4 ,ballin 7,mrs4 ,ada7 ,from ,cradle to ,school4 ,bryden 7,h4 ,a47 ,tales of ,south ,africa4 ,carmichael 7,montgomery7 ,sketches and ,stories1 ,grave and ,gay4 ,charrington 7,charles7 ,a ,sturdy ,beggar1 and ,lady ,bramber's ,ghost4 ,two ,stories4 ,doyle 7,c4 ,w47 ,the ,shadow of ,quong ,lung4 ---- ,the ,taming of the ,jungle4 ,goffic 7,c4 ,le7 ,the ,dark ,way of ,love4 ,hannan 7,charles1 ,f4,r4,g4,s47 ,chin-,chin-,wa4 ,kingsley 7,charles7 ,westward ,ho6 ,lytton 7,lord7 ,harold4 ,macfarlane 7,charles7 ,the ,camp of ,refuge4 ---- ,reading ,abbey4 ,macleod 7,fiona7 ,green ,fire4 ,morison 7,theodore7 ,imperial ,rule in ,india4 ,parker 7,nella7 ,dramas of ,to-,day4 ,peel 7,mrs4 ,c4 ,s47 ,the ,new ,home4 ---- ,ten ,shillings a ,head per ,week for ,house-books4 ,perks 7,mrs4 ,hartley7 ,among the ,bracken4 ,sinclair 7,ven4 ,archdeacon1 ,d4,d47 ,simplicity in ,christ4 ,steele 7,f4 ,a47 ,in the ,tideway4 ,stoker 7,bram7 ,the ,shoulder of ,shasta4 ,sturgis 7,julian7 ,the ,folly of ,pen ,harrington4 ,thorburn 7,s4 ,s47 ,his ,majesty's ,greatest ,subject4 ,ward 7,prof4 ,a4 ,w47 ,sir ,henry ,wotton4 ,sidenote3 #cs4 #f;d4 ,net ,allen 7,g4 ,c47 ,tales from ,tennyson4 ,barmby 7,b4 ,h47 ,gisli ,sursson4 ,a ,drama4 ,battersby 7,caryl7 ,the ,song of the ,golden ,bough4 ,courtney 7,w4 ,l47 ,the ,idea of ,tragedy4 ,deighton 7,kenneth7 ,conjectural ,readings in the ,old ,dramatists4 ,gemmer 7,c4 ,m47 ,fidelis and other ,poems4 ,madge 7,h4 ,d47 ,leaves from the ,golden ,legend4 ,meredith 7,george7 ,selected ,poems4 ,pocket ,edition4 ---- ,tale of ,chloe4 ,pocket ,edition4 ---- ,the ,story of ,bhanavar4 ,pocket ,edn4 ,rait 7,r4 ,s47 ,a ,royal ,rhetorician4 ,the ,manchester ,stage1 #ahhj-aijj4 ,sidenote3 #ds4 ,gall 7,john1 ,m4,a41 ,,ll4,b47 and ,robertson 7,david1 ,b4,sc47 ,popular ,readings in ,science4 ,lewes 7,vivian ,b47 and ,brame 7,j4 ,s4 ,s47 ,laboratory ,note ,book for ,chemical ,students4 ,sidenote3 #ds4 ,net4 ,boswell's ,account of ,dr4 ,johnson's ,tour in the ,hebrides4 #b volumes4 ,cloth4 ,sidenote3 #ds4 #f;d4 ,meredith ,birthday ,book4 ,sidenote3 #ds4 #f;d4 ,net4 ,thomson 7,j4 ,j47 ,the ,discharge of ,electricity through ,gases4 ,sidenote3 #es4 ,baughan 7,b4 ,e47 ,verses4 ,bidder 7,george7 ,by ,southern ,shore4 ---- ,merlin's ,youth4 ,cloth4 ,four ,gospels4 ,leather4 ,gale 7,norman7 ,a ,country ,muse4 #ast ,series4 ---- #bnd ,series4 ,mills 7,e4 ,j47 ,my ,only ,child4 ,nesbit 7,e47 ,songs of ,love and ,empire4 ,piatt 7,j4 ,j47 ,the ,ghost's ,entry4 ,piatt 7,mrs47 ,child ,world ,ballads4 ,rogers 7,alexander7 ,the ,widowed ,queen4 ,skrine 7,j4 ,h47 ,songs of the ,maid4 ,somervell 7,a47 and ,brooke 7,leslie7 ,singing ,time4 ,a ,child's ,song ,book4 ,walker 7,charles7 ,shooting on a ,small ,income4 ,wilkinson 7,spenser7 ,the ,nation's ,awakening4 ,wilson 7,robert7 ,laurel ,leaves4 ,sidenote3 #es4 ,net4 ,armstrong 7,arthur ,coles7 ,a ,tale from ,boccaccio4 ,davidson 7,thomas7 ,a ,history of ,education4 ,dinsmore 7,charles ,a47 ,the ,teachings of ,dante4 ,dryden 7,john7 ,aureng-,zebe1 ,somerville 7,william7 ,the ,chace4 ,edited by ,kenneth ,deighton4 ,graham 7,david7 ,rizzio4 ---- ,darnley4 ,mitchell 7,h4 ,g47 ,the ,world ,before ,abraham4 ,seton-,watson 7,r4 ,w47 ,maximilian4 ,sneath 7,e4 ,hershey7 ,the ,mind of ,tennyson4 ,stanton 7,frank ,l47 ,songs of the ,soil4 ,sidenote3 #fs4 #8,alien' ,another ,woman's ,territory4 ,argyll 7,duke of7 ,adventures in ,legend4 ,bates 7,arlo7 ,the ,puritans4 ,berthet 7,e47 ,the ,catacombs of ,paris4 ,bidder 7,m47 ,in the ,shadow of the ,crown4 ,bower 7,marian7 ,the ,puppet ,show4 ,bradley 7,a4 ,g47 ,the ,fight with ,france for ,north ,america4 ,cairnes 7,captain ,w4 ,e47 ,the ,coming ,waterloo4 ,capes 7,bernard7 ,love ,like a ,gipsy4 ,chambers 7,r4 ,w47 ,cardigan4 ,charles 7,joseph ,f47 ,a ,statesman's ,chance4 ,conway 7,sir ,william ,martin7 ,the ,alps from ,end to ,end4 ,cooper 7,e4 ,h47 ,the ,enemies4 ,cornish 7,f4 ,warre7 ,sunningwell4 ,coxon 7,ethel7 ,within ,bounds4 ,currie 7,major-,gen4 ,fendall7 ,below the ,surface4 ,dale 7,t4 ,f47 and ,slaughter 7,f4 ,e47 ,two ,fortunes and ,old ,patch4 ,daniell 7,a4 ,e47 ,london ,city ,churches4 ---- ,london ,riverside ,churches4 ,darnley 7,countess of7 and ,hodgson 7,r4 ,ll47 ,elma ,trevor4 ,de ,bury 7,yetta ,blaze7 ,french ,literature of ,to-day4 ,denny 7,charles ,e47 ,the ,failure of the ,wanderer4 ,dutt 7,r4 ,c47 ,the ,literature of ,bengal4 ,flowerdew 7,h47 ,retaliation4 ,forbes-,robertson 7,francis7 ,odd ,stories4 ---- ,the ,potentate4 ,ford 7,paul ,leicester7 ,the ,story of an ,untold ,love4 ---- ,tattle ,tales of ,cupid4 ---- ,janice ,meredith4 ,gallon 7,tom7 ,the ,man who ,knew ,better4 ,glasgow 7,ellen7 ,the ,battle ,ground4 ,gwynn 7,paul7 ,marta4 ,harald 7,h4 ,j47 ,the ,knowledge of ,life4 ,harris 7,joel ,chandler7 ,sister ,jane4 ,hewlett 7,maurice7 ,new ,canterbury ,tales4 ,hutten 7,baroness von7 ,marr'd in ,making4 ,james 7,henry7 ,the ,wings of the ,dove4 ,johnston 7,mary7 ,the ,old ,dominion4 ---- ,by ,order of the ,company4 ---- ,audrey4 ,krehbiel 7,henry ,e47 ,music and ,manners in the ,classical ,period4 ,lachambre and ,machuron4 ,andre and his ,balloon4 ,lover 7,samuel7 ,handy ,andy4 ---- ,treasure ,trove4 ---- ,rory ,o',more4 ---- ,legends and ,stories of ,ireland4 ,vol4 ,i4 -------- ,vol4 ,,ii4 ----,further ,stories4 ,machray 7,robert7 ,sir ,hector4 ,mac,ilwaine 7,herbert ,c47 ,dinkinbar4 ----,fate the ,fiddler4 ,mc,ilwraith 7,jean ,n47 ,curious ,career of ,robert ,campbell4 ,mc,laws 7,lafayette7 ,when the ,land was ,young4 ,macleod 7,fiona7 ,the ,laughter of ,peterkin4 ---- ,the ,dominion of ,dreams4 ,mason 7,a4 ,e4 ,w47 ,ensign ,knightley1 and other ,stories4 ,meakin 7,a4 ,m4 ,b47 ,a ,ribbon of ,iron4 ,meredith 7,george7 ,the ,ordeal of ,richard ,feverel4 ---- ,rhoda ,fleming4 ---- ,sandra ,belloni4 ---- ,vittoria4 ---- ,diana of the ,crossways4 ---- ,beauchamp's ,career4 ---- ,the ,adventures of ,harry ,richmond4 ,meredith 7,george7 ,the ,egoist4 ---- ,the ,tragic ,comedians4 ---- ,evan ,harrington4 ---- ,the ,tale of ,chloe and other ,stories4 ---- ,the ,shaving of ,shagpat4 ---- ,the ,amazing ,marriage4 ---- ,one of ,our ,conquerors4 ---- ,poems4 #b vols4 ,each4 ---- ,lord ,ormont and his ,aminta4 ---- ,an ,essay on ,comedy4 ,merejkowski 7,dmitri7 ,the ,death of the ,gods4 ---- ,the ,resurrection of the ,gods4 ,montague 7,charles7 ,the ,vigil4 ,nansen 7,fridtjof7 ,farthest ,north4 ,newman 7,mrs47 ,his ,vindication4 ,payne 7,will7 ,the ,story of ,eva4 ,penrose 7,mrs4 ,h4 ,h47 ,the ,modern ,gospel4 ,prichard 7,k4 ,h47 ,karadac4 ,reed 7,marcus7 #8,pride of ,england4' #8,rita' ,the ,sin of ,jasper ,standish4 ,russell 7,w4 ,clark7 ,the ,ship's ,adventure4 ,scott 7,eva7 ,rupert1 ,prince ,palatine4 ,setoun 7,gabriel7 ,the ,skipper of ,barncraig4 ,siborne 7,captain ,william7 ,the ,waterloo ,campaign1 #ahae4 ,sichel 7,edith7 ,the ,household of the ,lafayettes4 ,sinclair 7,may7 ,two ,sides of a ,question4 ,smith 7,f4 ,hopkinson7 ,caleb ,west3 ,master ,diver4 ,soane 7,john7 ,the ,quest of ,mr4 ,east4 ,stoker 7,bram7 ,dracula4 ,street 7,g4 ,s47 ,a ,book of ,stories4 ,sturgis 7,julian7 ,stephen ,calinari4 ,tarver 7,j4 ,c47 ,some ,observations of a ,foster ,parent4 ---- ,debateable ,claims4 ,trevor-,battye 7,aubyn7 ,a ,northern ,highway of the ,czar4 ,tynan 7,katharine7 ,that ,sweet ,enemy4 ,waddell 7,major ,l4 ,a47 ,among the ,himalayas4 ,white 7,stewart ,e47 ,the ,westerners4 ---- ,the ,blazed ,trail4 ,wicksteed 7,rev4 ,p4 ,h47 ,the ,chronicle of ,villani4 ,wilson 7,archdeacon ,j4 ,m47 ,truths ,new and ,old4 ,wilson 7,sarah7 ,the ,romance of our ,ancient ,churches4 ,winslow 7,mrs4 ,anna ,green7 ,diary of a ,boston ,school ,girl4 ,young 7,ernest7 ,the ,kingdom of the ,yellow ,robe4 #8,zack' ,the ,white ,cottage4 ,sidenote3 #fs4 ,net4 ,boswell's ,account of ,dr4 ,johnson's ,tour in the ,hebrides4 ,half leather4 #b vols4 ,the set4 ,browning 7,robert7 ,men and ,women4 #b vols4 ,the set4 ,burroughs 7,john7 ,whitman4 ,campbell 7,james ,dykes7 ,coleridge's ,poems4 ,cunynghame 7,h4 ,h47 ,art ,enamelling on ,metals4 ,illustrated4 ,second ,edition4 ,godkin 7,e4 ,l47 ,unforeseen ,tendencies of ,democracy4 ,meredith 7,george7 ,odes in ,contribution to the ,song of ,french ,history4 ---- ,selected ,poems4 ---- ,a ,reading of ,life4 ,mowbray 7,j4 ,p47 ,the ,making of a ,country ,home4 ,mnsterberg 7,hugo7 ,psychology and ,life4 ,thompson 7,francis7 ,new ,poems4 ,torrey 7,joseph7 ,elementary ,studies in ,chemistry4 ,turner 7,h4 ,h41 ,f4,r4,s47 ,modern ,astronomy4 ,sidenote3 #gs4 #f;d4 ,bertram 7,james7 ,some ,memories of ,books1 ,authors and ,events4 ,chailley-,bert 7,j47 ,colonisation of ,indo-,china4 ,collins 7,churton7 ,ephemera ,critica4 ,curzon 7,lord1 of ,kedleston7 ,problems of the ,far ,east4 ,elliott 7,robert7 ,gold1 ,sport1 and ,coffee-,planting in ,mysore4 ,godkin 7,e4 ,l47 ,reflections and ,comments4 ---- ,problems of ,modern ,democracy4 ,hodgson 7,r4 ,ll47 ,on ,plain and ,peak4 ,stuart 7,john7 ,pictures of ,war4 ,thomson 7,james7 ,poems4 ,sidenote3 #gs4 #f;d4 ,net4 ,hayden 7,e4 ,g47 ,travels ,round our ,village4 ,masterman 7,n47 ,chalmers on ,charity4 ,mc,crindle 7,j4 ,w47 ,ancient ,india as described in ,classical ,literature4 ,mowbray 7,j4 ,p47 ,a ,journey to ,nature4 ,roberts 7,morley7 ,the ,western ,avernus4 ,sidenote3 #is4 ,net4 ,spenser 7,edmund7 ,the ,faerie ,queene4 #f vols4 ,cloth4 ,sidenote3 #ajs4 ,net4 ,bonavia 7,emmanuel7 ,flora of the ,assyrian ,monuments4 ,hanna 7,col4 ,h4 ,b47 ,the ,second ,afghan ,war4 ,vol4 ,i4 ,sidenote3 #ajs4 #f;d4 ,constable's ,hand ,gazetteer of ,india4 ,holden 7,ed4 ,s47 ,mogul ,emperors of ,hindustan4 ,jardine 7,hon4 ,justice7 ,burma a ,hundred ,years ,ago4 ,loti 7,pierre7 ,impressions4 ,mc,nair 7,major ,j4 ,f4 ,a47 ,prisoners their ,own ,warders4 ,ryley and ,m',candlish1 ,scotland's ,free ,church4 ,sidenote3 #ajs4 #f;d4 ,net4 ,bain 7,r4 ,nisbet7 ,peter ,,iii4 ,gairdner 7,james7 ,the ,paston ,letters4 ,supplementary ,volume4 ,hackel 7,eduard7 ,the ,true ,grasses4 ,leaf 7,cecil ,h47 ,the ,surgical ,anatomy of the ,lymphatic ,glands4 ,list of #hcg ,london ,publishers4 ,rogers 7,c4 ,j47 ,coin ,collecting in ,northern ,india4 ,roosevelt 7,theodore7 ,oliver ,cromwell4 ,townsend 7,meredith7 ,asia and ,europe4 ,sidenote3 #abs4 ,arnold 7,t4 ,w47 ,the ,preaching of ,islam4 ,gardner 7,e4 ,g47 ,dante's ,ten ,heavens4 ,gardner 7,e4 ,g47 and ,wicksteed 7,p4 ,h47 ,dante and ,giovanni del ,virgilio4 ,gomme 7,g4 ,laurence7 ,the ,principles of ,local ,government4 ,hewitt 7,j4 ,f47 ,ruling ,races of ,prehistoric ,times4 ,second ,series4 ,irwin 7,s4 ,t47 ,letters of ,t4 ,e4 ,brown4 #b vols4 ,lafargue 7,philip7 ,stephen ,brent4 #b vols4 ,metcalfe 7,c4 ,t47 ,two ,native ,narratives of the ,mutiny in ,delhi4 ,prichard 7,hesketh7 ,where ,black ,rules ,white4 ,traill 7,h4 ,d47 ,england1 ,egypt and the ,sudan4 ,sidenote3 #abs4 ,net4 ,boswell's ,life of ,johnson4 ,edited by ,augustine ,birrell4 #f vols41 fcap4 #hvo4 ,lane ,poole 7,stanley7 ,mohammedan ,dynasties4 ,leach 7,a4 ,f41 ,m4,a41 ,f4,s4,a47 ,english ,schools at the ,reformation1 #aedf-dh4 ,zimmermann 7,dr4 ,a47 ,botanical ,microtechnique4 ,sidenote3 #abs4 #f;d4 ,popowski 7,joseph7 ,the ,rival ,powers in ,central ,asia4 ,smythe 7,a4 ,j47 ,william ,terriss1 ,actor4 ,sidenote3 #abs4 #f;d4 ,net4 ,campbell 7,james ,dykes7 ,coleridge's ,poems4 ,large paper4 ,morison 7,m47 ,time ,table of ,modern ,history4 ,rait 7,robert ,s47 ,five ,stuart ,princesses4 ,round 7,j4 ,horace7 ,the ,commune of ,london4 ,sidenote3 #ads4 ,anon4 ,regeneration4 ,constable's ,hand ,atlas of ,india4 ,hake 7,a4 ,e47 and ,wesslau 7,o4 ,e47 ,the ,coming ,individualism4 ,smith 7,edward7 ,england and ,america after ,independence4 ,sidenote3 #aes4 ,bain 7,r4 ,nisbet7 ,the ,daughter of ,peter the ,great4 ,spalding 7,t4 ,a47 ,the ,life and ,times of ,richard ,badiley1 ,vice-,admiral of the ,fleet4 ,wilkinson 7,spenser7 ,war and ,policy4 ,sidenote3 #aes4 ,net4 ,blount 7,bertram7 ,practical ,electro-,chemistry4 ,duff 7,c4 ,m47 ,the ,chronology of ,india4 ,pincott 7,f47 ,the ,prema ,sagara4 ,spenser 7,edmund7 ,the ,faerie ,queene4 #f volumes4 ,canvas gilt4 ,whiteway 7,r4 ,s47 ,the ,rise of ,portuguese ,power in ,india4 ,sidenote3 #afs4 ,fox 7,arthur ,w47 ,a ,book of ,bachelors4 ,mac,george 7,g4 ,w47 ,ways and ,works in ,india4 ,sidenote3 #afs4 ,net4 ,sichel 7,edith7 ,women and ,men of the ,french ,renaissance4 ,webb 7,w4 ,w47 ,coins of the ,hindu ,states of ,rajputana4 ,sidenote3 #ags4 #f;d4 ,net4 ,thornton 7,surgeon-,general7 ,memories of ,seven ,campaigns4 ,sidenote3 #ahs4 ,anitchkow 7,michael7 ,war and ,labour4 ,engelhardt 7,h47 ,a ,russian ,province of the ,north4 ,gribble 7,francis7 ,lake ,geneva1 and its ,literary ,landmarks4 ,hewitt 7,j4 ,f47 ,ruling ,races of ,prehistoric ,times4 ,first ,series4 ,stadling 7,j47 ,through ,siberia4 ,edited by ,dr4 ,f4 ,h4 ,h4 ,guillemard4 ,sidenote3 #ahs4 ,net4 ,boswell's ,life of ,johnson4 ,edited by ,a4 ,birrell1 ,k4,c4 #f vols41 fcap4 #hvo1 half leather4 ,sidenote3 #bjs4 ,oppert 7,gustav7 ,the ,original ,inhabitants of ,india4 ,sidenote3 #bas4 ,dale 7,t4 ,f47 ,the ,eighth ,duke of ,beaufort and the ,badminton ,hunt4 ,sidenote3 #bas4 ,net4 ,bonavia 7,e47 ,the ,evolution of ,animals4 ,dale 7,t4 ,f47 ,the ,history of the ,belvoir ,hunt4 ,gairdner 7,james7 ,the ,paston ,letters4 #d vols4 ,legg 7,l4 ,g4 ,wickham71 and ,hope 7,w4 ,h4 ,st4 ,john7 ,inventories of ,christchurch1 ,canterbury4 ,newberry 7,percy ,e47 ,the ,life of ,rekhmara4 ,sapte 7,brand7 ,memorials of ,haileybury ,college4 ,vibart 7,col4 ,h4 ,m47 ,addiscombe4 ,sidenote3 #bes4 ,net4 ,campbell 7,lord ,archibald7 ,highland ,dress1 ,arms1 and ,ornament4 ,sidenote3 #cjs4 ,net4 ,rice 7,louis7 ,the ,mysore ,gazetteer4 ,sidenote3 #cas4 #f;d4 ,net4 ,filippi 7,dr47 ,the ,ascent of ,mount ,st4 ,elias4 ,legg 7,wickham7 ,english ,coronation ,records4 ,lewes 7,vivian ,b47 ,acetylene4 ,sidenote3 #cbs4 ,schweitzer 7,georg7 ,emin ,pasha3 ,his ,life and ,work4 ,vallery-,radot 7,rene7 ,the ,life of ,pasteur4 #b vols4 ,sidenote3 #cbs4 ,net4 ,cole 7,alan7 ,ornament in ,european ,silks4 ,nisbet 7,john7 ,burma under ,british ,rule4 #b vols4 ,sidenote3 #cfs4 ,net4 ,boswell's ,life of ,johnson4 #f vols4 ,limited ,edition4 ,illustrated4 ,sidenote3 #b4 ,oppert 7,gustav7 ,the ,original ,inhabitants of ,india4 ,large paper4 ,sidenote3 #b ,net4 ,garner1 ,an ,english4 #h vols4 ,cloth or ,buckram4 ,sidenote3 #b #bs4 ,net4 ,beaumont 7,worby7 ,motor ,vehicles and ,motors4 ,granby 7,marchioness of7 ,portraits of ,men and ,women4 ,national ,worthies4 ,rait 7,r4 ,s47 ,lusus ,regius4 ,sidenote3 #b #abs4 #f;d4 ,net4 ,meredith 7,george7 ,nature ,poems4 ,sidenote3 #c #cs4 ,net4 ,bright 7,e4 ,b4 and ,c47 ,life of ,sir ,charles ,tilston ,bright4 ,filippi 7,dr47 ,the ,ascent of ,mount ,st4 ,elias4 ,edition de ,luxe4 ,mayo 7,j4 ,h47 ,medals and ,decorations of the ,british ,army and ,navy4 ,stein 7,m4 ,a47 ,kalhana's ,rajatarangini4 ,sidenote3 #c #abs4 ,net4 ,the ,waverley ,novels4 ,the ,author's ,favourite ,edition4 ,reprint1 #dh vols41 fcap4 #hvo4 ,cloth1 paper label4 ,sidenote3 #d #afs4 ,net4 ,the ,waverley ,novels4 ,the ,author's ,favourite ,edition4 ,reprint1 #dh vols41 fcap4 #hvo4 ,cloth1 gilt extra1 gilt top4 ,sidenote3 #e #es4 ,net4 ,meredith 7,george7 ,nature ,poems4 ,large paper4 ,travels of ,h4,i4,m4 ,czar ,nicholas ,,ii4 7when ,cesarewitch7 in the ,east4 #b vols4 ,sidenote3 #f ,net4 ,the ,waverley ,novels4 ,the ,author's ,favourite ,edition4 ,reprint1 #dh vols41 fcap4 #hvo4 ,half leather1 gilt top4 ,w4 ,h4 ,st4 ,john ,hope4 ,the ,stall ,plates of the ,knights of the ,order of the ,garter1 #acdh-adhe4 ,sidenote3 #h #hs4 ,net4 ,hyde 7,william7 and ,meynell 7,alice7 ,london ,impressions4 ,sidenote3 #bf #es4 ,travels of ,h4,i4,m4 ,czar ,nicholas ,,ii4 7when ,cesarewitch7 in the ,east4 ,large paper4 99 99 99 99 99 ,,the ,,waverley ,,novels4 ,facsimile ,reprint of the ,favourite ,edition of ,,sir ,,walter ,,scott4 ,with all the ,original ,plates and ,vignettes4 ,red cloth1 paper back title4 ,price #as4 #f;d4 per vol4 net4 ,cloth gilt1 gilt top4 ,price #bs4 per vol4 net4 ,quarter leather1 gilt top4 ,price #bs4 #f;d4 per vol4 net4 ,vols4 #a1 #b4 ,waverley4 ,vols4 #c1 #d4 ,guy ,mannering4 ,vols4 #e1 #f4 ,the ,antiquary4 ,vols4 #g1 #h4 ,rob ,roy4 ,vol4 #i4 ,the ,black ,dwarf4 ,vols4 #aj1 #aa4 ,old ,mortality4 ,vols4 #ab1 #ac4 ,heart of ,midlothian4 ,vol4 #ad4 ,bride of ,lammermoor4 ,vol4 #ae4 ,legend of ,montrose4 ,vols4 #af1 #ag4 ,ivanhoe4 ,vols4 #ah1 #ai4 ,the ,monastery4 ,vols4 #bj1 #ba4 ,the ,abbot4 ,vols4 #bb1 #bc4 ,kenilworth4 ,vols4 #bd1 #be4 ,the ,pirate4 ,vols4 #bf1 #bg4 ,fortunes of ,nigel4 ,vols4 #bh1 #bi1 #cj4 ,peveril of the ,peak4 ,vols4 #ca1 #cb4 ,quentin ,durward4 ,vols4 #cc1 #cd4 ,st4 ,ronan's ,well4 ,vols4 #ce1 #cf4 ,redgauntlet4 ,vol4 #cg4 ,the ,betrothed4 ,vol4 #ch4 ,the ,talisman4 ,vols4 #ci1 #dj4 ,woodstock4 ,vol4 #da4 ,highland ,widow1 etc4 ,vols4 #db1 #dc4 ,fair ,maid of ,perth4 ,vols4 #dd1 #de4 ,anne of ,geierstein4 ,vols4 #df1 #dg4 ,count ,robert of ,paris4 ,castle ,dangerous4 ,vol4 #dh4 ,the ,surgeon's ,daughter4 ,glossary4 ,typographical errors corrected by the etext transcriber3 natually desire knowledge naturally desire knowledge pg #ai 8ber die ,entstehung des ,rechtsgefhls40 8ber die ,entstehung des ,rechtsgefhls40 pg #dc is is obvious that ,zeus it is obvious that ,zeus pg #ajf