,transcriber's note3 ,some typographical errors in the printed work have been corrected3 they are listed at the end of the text4 ,text enclosed by underscores is in italics 7italics74 ,page numbers enclosed by curly braces 7example3 #be7 have been incorporated to facilitate the use of the ,index4 ,images of the original plates are available through ,internet ,archive4 ,see https3_/_/archive4org_/details_/palograp hynote#jjquarrich 99 99 99 99 99 ,,pal,,ography ,,notes ,,upon ,,the ,,history ,,of ,,writing ,,and ,,the ,,medieval ,,art ,,of ,,illumination ,,by ,,bernard ,,quaritch ,extended from a ,lecture1 delivered at a ,conversazione of the ,sette of ,odd ,volumes1 at the ,galleries of the ,royal ,institute of ,painters in ,water ,colours1 #abth ,december1 #ahic ,london ,,privately ,,printed #ahid ,this ,volume is ,dedicated to my excellent friend ,,brother ,,alexander ,t4 ,,hollingsworth1 ,,artificer1 and ,,president ,,of ,the ,odd ,volumes1 #ahic-id1 ,,and ,,to ,,the ,,brethren ,,of ,,the ,,sette ,,with ,,which ,i have been united since #ahgh in ,o4 ,v4 bond1 ,,by ,,bernard ,,quaritch1 ,librarian to the ,sette4 ,london1 #ae ,piccadilly1 ,march #cast1 #ahid4 #a;,foreword ,of the books which preceded the invention of ,printing1 a much larger quantity is still extant than the world in general would suppose1 but they are nevertheless so widely scattered and so seldom immediately accessible1 that only a very long experience will enable any one to speak or to write about them in other than a blundering fashion4 ,so many qualifications are required1 that it may seem presumptuous in me to treat upon a matter bristling with difficulties and uncertainties4 ,the brief but admirable outline of its history which ,mr4 ,maunde ,thompson has lately published is likely to mislead the inexperienced into a belief that a science defined with so much clearness and apparent ease may as easily be mastered4 ,no one knows better than that accomplished scholar how hard it would be to supply sure and definite criteria for the guidance of palographical students in all the branches of their fascinating pursuit4 ,my excuse must be that the observations which appear in the present opusculum may be useful to some who are unable for various reasons to give the necessary fulness of #bstudy to ,mr4 ,thompson's work1 and who1 while loving manuscripts as well as ,i do1 have not had so large an experience4 ,i may venture to justify myself by a personal anecdote4 ,the author of the ,stones of ,venice once said that he was surprised by my apparently exact knowledge of the commercial value of manuscripts2 and my reply was that1 as ,i had for twenty years been the buyer of1 or the underbidder for1 all the fine examples which had appeared in the public auctions1 there was no great reason for his wonder4 ,the following sketch will consist of a number of cursory remarks upon the calligraphy and the ornamentation of medieval manuscripts2 preceded by an historical sketch1 arranged in chronological paragraphs1 of the beginnings and the gradual diffusion of the art of writing throughout the world4 ,the ,beginnings of ,writing ,palography is the branch of science which deals with ancient writing 7,greek3 palaia graph74 ,as the ,greek word for writing comprises a great deal more than the work of pen and ink1 palographical study would be imperfect if it did not take into consideration the ancient inscriptions upon stone and metal which are usually left to numismatists and other archologists4 ,in a small treatise like the present1 no such ambitious and comprehensive treatment is intended4 ,the object is mainly to summarise the results of other men's labour1 and to give a general idea of what is known at the present day about the diffusion of the art of writing and the methods of producing books before the sixteenth century4 ,the name for book in various ancient languages is indicative of the earliest stage in the history of writing4 ,the ,english word itself appears in its oldest written form in the ,gothic ,scriptures of the fourth century1 in which boka writing1 and bokos things written books4 ,this is #c;believed to be derived from the name of the tree we call beech and the ,germans buche1 because it is supposed that the bark or wood of that tree was used for cutting runes upon4 ,similar to this is the ,latin liber1 which originally meant the inner bark of a tree1 and afterwards came to mean book1 because leaves were made from that inner bark for the purpose of writing4 ,diphthera1 in ancient ,ionic-,greek1 was equivalent to book1 because it meant a polished skin 7like parchment or leather7 used for writing upon before the ,greeks adopted papyrus 7byblos1 biblos7 from the ,egyptians4 ,then the name for papyrus became the name for a book1 and has been retained in modern speech in the word ,bible4 ,the word diphthera passed into use among the ,persians about five hundred years before ,christ1 as the material was borrowed by them from the ,ionians for the use of the scribes who kept the royal records1 and it still remains in the speech of the modern ,persians as defter book4 ,the ,hebrew word sepher engraving1 and is therefore used to designate a book2 and the same sense underlies the ,arabic word ,kitab4 ,writing was a scratching or incising of symbols representing sounds 7or ideas7 upon stone or metal1 upon wood1 or bark1 or leaves 7folia71 dressed leather1 parchment1 papyrus1 wax tablets1 and paper4 ,the form in which the sheets 7of skin1 parchment1 bark1 papyrus1 or paper7 were gathered1 may have been rolls in which they were united to form a single page1 or a square combination of successive leaves united only at one side4 ,the former was of course the earlier mode1 but the latter was also in use at a remote date4 ,greek and ,roman scribes had evidently begun to prefer the square fashion during the early days of the ,roman empire2 and we may take it to have become the prevalent custom in the fourth century4 ,black ink has always been in use for writing1 red and blue ink are of comparatively recent date4 ,the use of gold ink1 which was of course so costly that it could never be otherwise than rare1 originated probably when the empire was as #dyet unshaken by barbarian inroads2 it was1 however1 not extinct in ,rome during the sixth and seventh centuries1 and was relatively not uncommon at the magnificent court of ,byzantium4 ,late examples were produced in ,gaul for the ,frankish princes in the ninth century2 and in these the simple splendour of the ,roman style was embellished with ornamentation chiefly drawn from ,irish and ,anglo-,saxon models4 ,although people knew how to write and to read more than five thousand years ago1 a reading public1 as we understand the term1 came into existence for the first time in ,greece in the fifth century ,b4,c41 and again in ,rome in the first century ,b4,c4 ,by this it is meant that there were people who bought books for the pleasure of reading them1 as distinguished from the class which produced or used books as an official necessity4 ,the requirements of that reading public among the ,greeks1 led to the disuse of skins for the purpose of writing1 since only a cheaper and more plentiful material could satisfy the demand4 ,egyptian papyrus being both cheap and plentiful1 it was adopted and remained in use for over a thousand years among the people who spoke ,greek and ,latin4 ,books upon vellum or parchment--charta pergamena1 an improved form of the old skins--were only produced occasionally1 as luxuries1 between the second century ,b4,c4 and the fifth century of our era4 ,at this latter period1 the reading public was extinguished in the revolutions of barbarian conquest1 and the cheap material ceased to be necessary4 ,in the absence of a popular demand for books1 and when only persons of exceptional learning1 churchmen1 statesmen1 and monks1 experienced the need of reading and writing1 the supply of vellum was sufficient1 and this dearer material was relatively economical because of its durability4 ,a reading public can hardly be said to have come into renewed existence till the fifteenth century1 and then once more vellum was superseded by the cheaper material of paper4 ,paper1 from linen or rags1 had been made in the #e,saracenic east for several centuries1 but was little used in ,europe till the thirteenth century1 and was not fabricated in the west to any considerable extent until the fourteenth century4 ,writing in ,egypt #ejjj ,b4,c4 ,the origin of writing1 that is of the art of transmitting information by means of symbols representing speech1 is1 like the origin of every other invention1 obscure and uncertain4 ,it is not the proud ,aryan1 nor his elder brother the ,semite1 who can claim the honour of the invention4 ,it belongs neither to ,japhet nor to ,shem 7convenient eponyms7 but to the despised ,ham1 with whom they are unwilling to acknowledge kinship4 ,four thousand years before ,christ 7the very period at which1 in ,milton's opinion1 ,adam and ,eve were banished from ,paradise7 the people of the ,nile ,valley formed a rich and powerful monarchy1 with an old civilisation1 and possessed the arts of painting1 sculpture1 architecture1 and writing4 ,their writing was chiefly upon stone monuments1 and recorded the deeds of their ,kings or the greatness of their ,gods4 ,they also wrote upon leaves of papyrus the forms of prayer and eulogy which were buried with their dead4 ,among the surviving written productions of that great monarchy is a work containing the ,moral ,precepts of ,ptah-,hotep4 ,written in the language of ,khem 7old ,egypt71 and in the hieratic character1 upon papyrus1 it is the oldest book in the world4 ,the period of its composition is more ancient than the date of the writing1 which1 by internal evidence1 has been proved to be over #bjjj ,b4,c4 ,it is now in the ,bibliothque ,nationale1 and is known by the name of the ,papyrus ,prisse4 ,as there can be no question that hieroglyphic writing 7engraving7 upon stone was considerably anterior to the evolution of the cursive hieratic written with pen and ink upon papyrus2 and as there is a hieroglyphic inscription on stone in the ,ashmolean ,museum #fwhich is assigned to #djjj ,b4,c4--we must infer that the real age of ,egyptian writing is beyond our ken4 ,it must be at the least six thousand years old2 and there are numerous examples in lapidar inscriptions which represent the millennium preceding the date of the ,prisse ,papyrus4 ,with this book1 written several centuries before ,moses dwelt in the land of ,egypt1 a sketch of the history of writing may modestly begin4 ,it must not be imagined that the dates of ,egyptian and ,babylonian documents are based upon enthusiastic conjecture1 or upon unaided calculation of the years assigned to the lives and reigns of monarchs in their newly discovered and deciphered records4 ,josephus and ,eusebius have preserved fragments of older historical writers1 among them portions of the lost ,chronicles of ,berossus the ,chaldan and ,manetho the ,egyptian1 whose works were written in ,greek in the fourth and third centuries before ,christ4 ,in former days1 when scholars were nurtured upon the ,christian chronology which counted the birth of ,christ as ,a4,m4 #djjd1 or ,a4,m4 #ehgj1 according as the ,hebrew ,bible or the ,septuagint was adopted as the authority for dates1 it was the custom to deride as fabulous the immense lists of ,chaldean and ,egyptian dynasties1 which spoiled the story of ,genesis2 but the hieroglyphic and the cuneiform monuments have yielded up their long-buried testimony to justify the discredited chroniclers4 ,nothing in romance is more wonderful than the story of the work of interpretation1 by which old ,egypt and old ,assyria have been brought forward into the light of authentic history4 ,two generations of acute and patient scholars working contemporaneously in ,england1 ,france1 ,germany1 and ,italy1 have contrived1 without dictionary1 without grammar1 without even a key to the mysterious letters1 to decipher and to read the stony records of those ancient empires4 ,their first labour was to distinguish the symbols1 and to assign to them a phonetic value1 then to compare the resultant words with the vocabulary of known languages supposed to be akin to the old #gones4 ,in the case of the hieroglyphics1 the ,coptic language alone offered its aid1 this being the tongue of ,egypt as written and spoken in the first ten centuries of our era1 genuine ,egyptian indeed1 but necessarily differing enormously from its earliest phases thousands of years back4 ,as to the cuneiform inscriptions1 the various ,semitic tongues furnished means of comparison for ,assyrian texts1 the ,persian and ,zend for old ,persic and ,median1 and certain cuneiform vocabularies were discovered which rendered it possible to understand a third language1 the most ancient of them all1 which had been utterly unknown even by name4 ,from the time of ,christ1 perhaps even before it1 down to sixty years ago1 the languages and monuments of ,egypt and ,chalda had never been looked upon by the eye of intelligence4 ,the mystery of ages is a mystery no more4 ,writing in ,chalda1 #djjj ,b4,c4 ,the age of ,chaldan writing 7engraving7 is not far behind that of the ,egyptian hieroglyphics4 ,it is said that an inscription of the first ,sargon1 ,king of ,akkad 7in the square or angular character out of which the wedge-shaped or cuneiform letters were evolved71 carries the record back to #chjj ,b4,c4 ,even if we take a large latitude in discounting the chronology1 there still remains a certainty that the cuneiform character of ,babylonia was used over the greater part of ,western ,asia from at least #bejj ,b4,c41 and in ,persia and its tributaries down to #cjj ,b4,c4 ,while1 of the ,egyptian writing1 we have remains exhibiting all the stages of development1 namely 7#a7 the hieroglyphic1 7#b7 the hieratic1 7#c7 the demotic1 7#d7 the ,coptic in ,greek letters2 of the cuneiform script we have only the two phases which may be roughly said to correspond to the ,egyptian hieratic and demotic1 or more exactly to two stages of the hieratic4 ,we cannot reconstruct the original ,chaldan hieroglyphics which must have preceded the ,chaldan hieratic and #h;cuneiform2 nor do we know 7at present7 of any truly cursive hand developed from the wedge-letters4 ,among the relics of the ,assyrians is a great number of stone tablets of small size1 containing reports to the monarch from provincial governors4 ,one of them1 now in the ,british ,museum1 is supposed1 from a phrase which occurs in it1 to show that the stone tablets were simply copies made for preservation in the archives1 while the actually transmitted originals were written on papyrus4 ,if that were the practice1 and there is inherent probability in the suggestion1 there would assuredly have been a great quantity of papyrus used throughout the ,assyrian empire2 yet not a fragment of that material has been discovered4 ,in the absence of some positive evidence1 we can but suppose it likely that the ,assyrians used papyrus 7or skins7 for writing on1 as well as the ,egyptians1 but applied it only to temporary purposes1 trusting rather to granite and brick1 than to paper or to leather1 whatever was intended for enduring record4 ,progress of the ,art1 ,b4,c4 #bejj-aejj ,at about #bejj ,b4,c4 all the civilisation of the world was confined to the regions bordering the whole length of the ,red ,sea1 and extending northwards to ,armenia4 ,in the ,south was ,egypt1 a powerful monarchy dominant at times from ,ethiopia to ,asia ,minor1 and in the ,north the ,chaldee kingdom of ,akkad dominant over ,mesopotamia and the frontier lands4 ,the country of ,egypt was named by its people ,keme or ,kheme1 and their language was called the speech of ,keme 7out of which the ,hebrews made ,ham74 ,the name of ,ai-,gupt was given to the ,delta by its ,semitic neighbours and inhabitants1 while they called the whole country ,mizr 7,mizraim7 or ,misr4 ,the former name has prevailed in ,european use1 as well as furnished the words ,copt and ,coptic1 although this is questionable4 ,the ,kheme language was written both in hieroglyphic and in hieratic #i;characters at the year #bejj ,b4,c4 ,the former were the ancient picture-symbols1 which were arranged in vertical columns and read from top to bottom and from left to right4 ,this practice was retained to the end1 notwithstanding that the ,egyptians had been long in contemporaneous possession of the cursive hieratic characters1 written in horizontal lines from right to left1 just as ,hebrew and ,arabic4 ,the hieratic character was simply an abridgment of the hieroglyphic1 a reduction of the pictorial to conventional forms4 ,the two scripts endured side by side till ,christianity supervened1 and then the modified ,greek alphabet which we call the ,coptic came into existence4 ,the demotic script1 a still more cursive reduction of the hieratic1 had come into use probably a thousand years ,b4,c41 but it was only used for private mercantile transactions1 and it died out on the establishment of the ,coptic4 ,examples of both hieroglyphic and demotic writing are given in the plates accompanying this sketch4 ,the ,akkadian ,chaldee language 7to be distinguished from the later ,semitic ,syro-,chaldee7 has1 like the ,egyptian ,khemi1 no immediate affinities with any other important form of speech4 ,they are both of an older type and stock than the oldest known members of the ,aryan and ,semitic families4 ,the ,akkadian is called ,turanian1 as showing undoubted resemblances to the ,turki and ,mongol languages of the lands lying north and east of ,persia1 which were named by the ,persians ,turan1 as distinguished from ,iran4 ,the place of the ,khemi in philology is not so easily defined4 ,it does not seem that any other language than that of ,egypt was ever written in the ,egyptian script4 ,the case is somewhat different with the ,chaldee characters4 ,they were adopted in varying modes for writing ,semitic and ,aryan languages1 as well as the native ,akkadian4 ,this resulted from the blending of populations by successive conquests4 ,the ,akkadian-,chaldees ruled in ,mesopotamia till #aejj ,b4,c41 when they went down before the ,semites from ,northern ,arabia4 #aj;,a branch of these ,semites had already for a considerable time occupied the eastern side of ,mesopotamia and were in possession of the region round ,nineveh1 at the time when their ,arabian kindred swept away the old dynasty that had had its chief seat in ,babylonia4 ,at or about #acjj ,b4,c41 the ,ninevite ,assyrians or ,syro-,chaldans united the whole of ,mesopotamia by conquest1 and completed the downfall of the ,akkadian ,chaldans who were thenceforward reduced to servitude4 ,even the later uprisings in ,babylonia were only the work of princes of ,assyrian blood4 ,the date mentioned is another standpoint in the history of writing4 ,the ,semite ,assyrians were now the chief users of the cuneiform script4 ,at ,babylon they seem to have retained it in the same form into which it had developed in the hands of the ,akkad people4 ,at ,nineveh1 it had undergone a modification2 the combinations of the symbols being considerably altered1 so that one may speak of ,babylonian characters and of ,assyrian characters as being two scripts1 although they look identical4 ,the ,semitic ,alphabet about #agjj ,b4,c4 ,this is 7in chronological sequence7 the place at which mention should be made of the ,greek myth that alphabetical letters were introduced into ,boeotia by ,cadmus the ,phoenician4 ,it has always been accepted as substantially true1 even by those who knew that ,cadmus in ,semitic speech meant simply ,the ,ancient1 or ,the ,eastern2 and has usually been assigned to about #aejj ,b4,c4 ,the story requires some modification1 and the date is probably a good deal out of reckoning4 ,here it is only referred to as showing the early use of letters by the ,phoenicians4 ,there are really no extant monuments to prove the anteriority of the ,semite alphabet to that of the ,greeks1 but there can be no question as to the fact4 ,the names of the ,greek letters are manifestly borrowed from a ,semitic speech1 and the ,cadmus story is in #aa;itself a sufficient acknowledgment of the secondary position of the ,hellenes4 ,it is generally held that the ,phoenicians derived their alphabet by means of a selection from the phonetic symbols of the ,egyptian hieratic script4 ,whether the process was due to the ,phoenicians themselves1 is not so clearly asserted4 ,mr4 ,maunde ,thompson1 following ,lenormant and the ,vicomte de ,roug1 seems to consider that it gradually took place in ,egypt after the ,arabs had conquered the country1 and when the ,hyksos or ,shepherd ,kings had established their dynasty 7#bjjj ,b4,c474 ,during the five hundred years of their rule there must have been a large ,semitic immigration1 and it is not unlikely that the ,semitic alphabet was then derived from the ,egyptian for the use of the ,syrians and ,arabs who dwelt in ,lower ,egypt4 ,there is1 on the other hand1 a modern theory that the ,semitic alphabet was not evolved in this way1 but from the hieratic ,babylonian writing4 ,it is true that similarities may be found between them1 and it is also demonstrable that the ,greek names of the alphabet were drawn from the speech1 not of ,phoenicia or ,palestine1 but of ,aram or ,semitic ,chalda4 ,nothing is certain as to the origin of the ,semitic alphabet1 notwithstanding the elaborate comparative tables produced by ,roug and others1 beyond the fact that several letters resemble ,egyptian 7and ,chaldo-,assyrian7 symbols having sometimes the same phonetic value4 ,the names given to their characters by the ,semites are undoubtedly descriptive of their apparent iconism1 and the initial sound of each name is the power of the letter4 ,this1 on the face of it1 would imply that the ,aramaic alphabet was an original invention4 ,the ,greeks who first received it1 must have been those of ,asia ,minor1 not those of ,hellas2 and the first transmitters were neither ,arabs1 nor ,jews1 nor ,phoenicians1 but ,babylonian ,aramans in contact with ,cilicia and ,cappadocia4 ,the names of the letters1 as sounded by the ,syrians of ,palestine 7,phoenicians1 ,israelites1 ,jews71 were3 ,aleph1 ,beth1 ,gimel1 ,daleth1 ,he1 ,vau1 ,zain 7,zai71 ,hheth 7,kheth71 ,teth1 ,yod1 #ab;,caph1 ,lamed1 ,mem 7maimwaters71 ,nun1 ,samekh1 ,ain 7,oin71 ,pe1 ,tsade1 ,koph1 ,resh 7head71 ,shin1 ,tau4 ,we have no actual knowledge of the ,chaldo-,aramaic sounds of these names1 but we know that the ,eastern ,syrians would probably have written them thus3-- ,alpha1 ,beta1 ,gamla1 ,dalta1 ,he1 ,vau1 ,zaita1 ,hheta1 ,teta1 ,yoda1 ,kappa1 ,lamda1 ,mu 7water71 ,nun 7,nu71 ,samkha 7,simkha,sigma71 ,oin 7,oi871 ,pe1 ,tsada1 ,koppa1 ,rash 7,ro8face71 ,shen1 ,tau4 ,leaving aside for the present any consideration of the changes and additions in the ,greek alphabet1 we may assume that it passed from ,babylonia through ,cilicia to the ,phrygians and ,lydians2 and that1 whatever intercourse may have taken place between the ,european ,greeks and the ,phoenicians then or afterwards1 the ,ionians of ,asia ,minor had already formulated the ,hellenic alphabet before it reached the ,thebans4 ,as it seems to be nearly certain that the ,phrygians possessed it in the tenth century before ,christ1 the ,aramans must have had it much earlier1 and we may credit them with the use of writing as far back as #acjj-abjj ,b4,c4 ,it is very unlikely that the ,western ,syrians were far behind1 but the oldest monuments extant go no higher than the tenth century1 and are probably surpassed in antiquity by some of the ,saban 7,himyarite or ,homerite7 inscriptions of ,southern ,arabia4 ,the ,himyari alphabet1 which is the direct ancestor of the modern ,abyssinian1 introduces some novel forms1 and has less resemblance to the ,aramaic original than any of the others4 ,most of the letters are1 however1 ultimately traceable to the ,aramaic1 although the date must have been remote1 to judge from the large divergences in shape which had had time to develop themselves before the type was fixed4 ,about1 or soon after1 #ajjj ,b4,c41 we find a considerable portion of the earth's surface occupied by people knowing how to write2 namely1 ,egypt1 ,nubia1 ,abyssinia1 ,arabia1 the whole of ,asia ,minor1 ,syria1 ,babylonia1 ,assyria1 ,armenia1 #ac;and ,china4 ,abyssinia and ,armenia are included because into the one country ,egyptian and ,himyaritic characters had been imported1 and into the other a form of ,babylonian4 ,china is placed in the list1 far below her pretensions1 because we do not really know the age of the character in which ,chinese books preserve the inscriptions of ,yu4 ,it appears derivable from the dissertations of ,m4 ,terrien1 whose sagacious learning has attracted many scholars1 that the earliest history recorded in ,chinese annals is not geographically ,chinese2 but that it represents the legends and traditions which were carried into ,china by the ancestors of the race4 ,a connexion has been found to subsist between those traditions and the early history of ,babylonia1 which leads to the inference that the ,akkadian people of #chjj ,b4,c4 and the ancestors of the ,chinese were at one time united4 ,assuming that the theory is justifiable1 we may treat the ,chinese in ,china as having inherited the art of writing1 however strangely altered in form4 ,it is probably true that they used the letters out of which their present characters descended1 in the country they now inhabit1 at more than #ajjj ,b4,c4 ,the ,alphabet in ,european ,greece1 #hjj ,b4,c4 ,the ,european ,greeks are not included in the preceding paragraph1 simply because there are no means of proving that they had the use of letters in the tenth century ,b4,c4 ,the probability1 however1 is that they were not far behind their brethren in ,asia ,minor4 ,the variations in the forms of some of the letters of the ,greek alphabet which are found in inscriptions at different places both in ,asia ,minor and in ,greece1 are attributable to local fashions and to the fact that the script was not built up all at once from a single model4 ,it is here that the tradition about ,cadmus has its chief significance2 for there can be little doubt that the alphabet of ,tyre1 not quite identical with its elder ,aramaic #adsister1 had some immediate influence in modifying the forms borrowed by the ,boeotians from the ,ionians4 ,the older ,greek alphabet has been already mentioned4 ,it was found after a while to be both insufficient and more than sufficient4 ,the ,tsade 7ts7 and ,koppa 7q7 were not needed in ,greek1 and were only retained formally as numerals4 ,as most ,greek organs could only give the same sound 7s7 to both the simkha and the shen 7which they called sigma and san71 one of the two names was superfluous4 ,so they kept the symbol for shen as an s1 but transferred to it the name of the simkha4 ,the symbol of the latter they retained in its place1 but sounded it as ks1 and called it ,ksi1 a name which did not badly suit the original ,semitic sound of the letter which was like hs rather than s4 ,the unaspirated ,he they called mere ,e 7,e psilon72 to the aspirated ,heta1 they left its name1 but regarded it as aspirated ,e4 ,its original ,semitic value as an aspirate 7adaptable to any vowel7 was not wholly lost sight of1 and this idea of its power survived the stage at which ,h had become nothing more than or ee4 ,the necessity of making aspirated letters led to the prefixing or over-writing of the ,h1 at first in its full size1 then 7so as to avoid confusion with ,eta7 in small1 then in half shape1 thus -4 ,this custom produced its complement in the shape of -1 to mark the soft breathing2 until in the eleventh century of our era1 the two breathings were worn down into semicircular form1 thus 7 1 74 ,another rejected symbol was the vau1 formed like the letter ,f and sounded like our ,v4 ,it dropped out of usage1 and they forgot its name1 although it had been considerably used by the old poets1 in connexion with whom it is usually named digamma1 because of its resemblance to a double gamma1 or one gamma superimposed on another4 ,it was found necessary to have a character for u1 and advantageous to use single symbols for double letters frequently occurring1 such as ph1 kh1 ps and oo 7long o74 ,the old ,eastern form of vau supplied the u2 in fact1 having dropped the letter as a consonant out of its sixth place in #aethe alphabet1 they put it in its vowel-character at the end4 ,the symbol of the discarded koppa was used for the ,ph1 which was not equivalent in sound to our ph1 but must have resembled the ,german pf4 ,the discarded tsada 7a trident7 was used to represent1 in some places ps1 in others kh1 but finally the symbol fell into two distinct forms1 by being written upright as 7psi7 and leaning sidewise as 7chi74 ,by the time of ,herodotus the ,greek alphabet may be considered as having reached exactly its present form in capital letters4 ,the cursive hand which must have existed at all times of ,greek writing was simply a rapid deformation of the capitals1 and consequently did not attain to any uniformly distinctive character till much later4 ,the general use of minuscules in any such uniform type is always referred to the eighth century after ,christ1 but really there is no essential change of form between the cursive letters a hundred years before ,christ and those of a thousand years after ,christ4 ,the chief difference is in the greater freedom and fluency of the late letters1 an air of practised familiarity which is lacking in the earlier cursive4 ,writing in ,italy from #gjj to #ajj ,b4,c4 ,the ,greeks and the ,phoenicians had a similar aptitude for establishing colonies abroad to that which the ,english have shown during the past three centuries4 ,thus the coast line of the ,mediterranean from ,tripoli to ,morocco1 and from ,sicily and ,southern ,italy to ,spain and ,gaul1 was dotted with ,punic and ,greek settlements created for purely commercial purposes1 but gaining an independent importance as time went on4 ,the chief seat of ,phoenician domination was at ,carthage2 of ,greek nationality at ,syracuse1 ,cum 7near ,naples71 and ,marseilles4 ,the age at which those colonies acquired political greatness may be roughly set down as in the fourth century before ,christ1 but it is sufficient for our purpose to know that they had been founded considerably #af;earlier2 and that the art of writing had been carried westward as far back at least as the seventh or eighth century ,b4,c4 ,it was virtually the one alphabet1 applied by various races to their various languages1 which was used at ,carthage and ,cadiz1 at ,marseilles and in ,sicily and ,italy1 in the seventh century ,b4,c4 ,italy was occupied by several distinct sets of people4 ,the ,umbrians1 ,latins1 and ,oscans occupied all the middle of the peninsula2 the ,pelasgic tribes who were in the heel and toe of the geographical boot were nearly ,grecised2 the ,etruscans held ,tuscany1 and ,celts occupied ,lombardy4 ,mommsen thought that the ,greek alphabet had reached the ,italians more than #acjj years before ,christ2 but a more modest estimate will be safer4 ,it was probably about seven hundred years ,b4,c4 when the ,etrurians received their alphabet from the ,greeks2 and there is no reason for thinking1 as ,mommsen implies1 that their first contact with ,greek letters had been elsewhere than in ,italy4 ,the alphabet reached them no doubt from ,cum1 as it did the ,latins1 and there was sufficient variation in the practice of the ,greek colonies in ,italy to account for the differences which mark ,etruscan1 ,umbrian1 and ,latin writing4 ,roman ,writing4 ,the usual date of the founding of ,rome is undoubtedly correct or nearly so4 ,it was about the middle of the eighth century ,b4,c41 and the rapid enlargement of the new ,latin town on the ,tiber1 produced by the influx of settlers into a trade emporium with waterway1 must have led to an early use of writing4 ,this indicates something like #gjj ,b4,c4 for the period of the extension of that art over the whole of ,italy4 ,the custom of writing from right to left and left to right in alternate lines was retained for several centuries among the various ,italic peoples1 but the ,latins seem to have been the first to adopt the ,greek modification by which #agthe letters took their permanent shape from the left-right sequence4 ,in several ,greek towns1 the old ,,gamma was replaced by a ,c 7the result of a cursive mode of writing71 and the triangular ,,delta had its second and third lines represented by a single curve4 ,the ,,pi was still a ,symbol3 ,p not connected in the middle1 and the ,p had a little stroke added to it 7,symbol3 ,r with short tail7 for the sake of distinction4 ,the ,sigma was commonly written ,symbol3 reverse tilted ,z instead of ,symbol3 reverse #c 7,,sigma74 ,the ,latins omitted of course such letters as they found superfluous 7z1 th1 k1 ph1 ch1 ps1 and oo71 but were naturally bound to retain letters already becoming superfluous to the ,greeks 7,f1 ,q74 ,the third letter of the alphabet was used for both ,k and ,g2 but later1 when the need of some differentiation became felt1 the useless ,z was replaced by a second ,c to which a tail was added 7,symbol3 ,c with diagonal tail74 ,the ,eta 7or ,heta7 was made to retain its earliest function as a strong breathing 7,h71 although the ,greeks were treating it as no more than ,,ee4 ,the ,greek confusion between the symbols for ks1 ps1 and ch1 affected the ,latins so far that one of the three letters1 i4e4 ,x1 was taken to represent the only sound of the three which their language needed1 namely ks2 and this being an afterthought1 it was put at the end of the alphabet4 ,thus in the second century ,b4,c4 the ,romans had their alphabet completely formed in the capital shapes1 and with the phonetic values1 which it thenceforward retained4 ,the letters were ,a1 ,b1 ,c1 ,d1 ,e1 ,f1 ,g1 ,h1 ,i1 ,l1 ,m1 ,n1 ,o1 ,p1 ,q1 ,r1 ,s1 ,t1 ,v1 ,x1 the ,f being sounded probably as our ,v and ,f1 the ,v as our ,u and ,w4 ,it was long afterwards that the ,f was restricted to the sound of ,english ,f1 and ,v as a consonant took the sound of ,english ,v 7instead of ,w47 ,the ,q was a more guttural letter than the ,c originally1 but afterwards lost its distinctiveness of utterance4 ,when it became fashionable to learn and quote ,greek1 in the time of ,cicero and after1 the letters ,,kappa1 ,,upsilon1 and ,,zeta were reinserted in the ,latin alphabet for form's sake1 as ,k1 ,y1 ,z4 ,it was not till the sixteenth century that1 in the northern countries of ,europe1 the letter ,j was evolved from the black letter form #ahof ,i 7,symbol3 blackletter ,i7 and the letter ,v split into ,u and ,v4 ,as for the ,w1 it was needed only by ,germanic people1 and was consequently a late intruder into the modern ,roman alphabet4 ,indian ,writing about #cjj ,b4,c4 ,to return to the ,east1 the first examples of native ,indian writing appeared in the rock-inscribed decrees of ,asoka1 found in various places over the north of ,india1 from the ,indus to the ,ganges1 and even in the ,dekkan2 which can be dated between #bej and #bcj ,b4,c4 ,the language is ,prakrit or ,pali1 the characters 7although at first sight they seem an independent script7 were derived like so many others from the ,semitic system1 and the nearest of the parallel types is the alphabet of the ,himyarite inscriptions4 ,the ,saban monarchy which ruled over ,southern ,arabia a thousand years ,b4,c4 had had large commercial relations with ,india1 and it was probably from that source that the people of ,bombay and the ,north-,west acquired the art of writing1 how long before ,asoka it would be difficult to learn4 ,out of the simple forms of ,asoka's alphabet all the modern scripts of ,indian native writing descended1 including the artificial and elaborate ,nagari alphabet which is one of the latest of them4 ,writing in ,central ,asia from #cjj ,b4,c4 ,in the kingdom of ,bactria1 the coins of the kings who from about #aej ,b4,c4 followed the older ,greek princes1 bear inscriptions in ,indian ,prakrit1 but not written in the same character as was used by ,asoka4 ,the two scripts differ so much in appearance not only from all others1 but also between themselves1 that one does not easily recognise the fact that they both must have been of ,himyaritic origin4 ,they are very different from the ,pehlvi which was used by ,parthian sovereigns in the second century after ,christ1 and by the ,sassanide kings in the fourth4 ,the #ai,pehlvi had been evolved from the later ,aramean1 and must have been in use in ,persia before the time of ,alexander2 but the existing specimens are all subsequent to the beginning of the ,christian era4 ,and as for the script which is called ,zend1 and which is used for writing the ,zoroastrian books of the most ancient ,persian language1 there is nothing to prove that it is not of much later invention than the ,pehlvi4 ,oriental ,letters after the beginning of the ,christian ,era ,samaria4--,the writing of ,palestine was probably identical originally with that of the ,phoenicians1 and the ,samaritan script1 which is still in use for biblical purposes1 has retained to the present day a considerable resemblance with that of ,tyre and ,sidon4 ,the expatriation and partial repatriation of the ,jews and ,israelites during the seventh and sixth centuries ,b4,c41 had the effect of leaving only a small remnant in the north of the land who preserved their ancient writing4 ,from that time to this some of the descendants of the ,samarians have continued to write their ,pentateuch 7which for them is the whole of the ,bible7 in the ancient characters of the ,hebrew language 7a specimen is found on plate #d74 ,all the rest of the ,jews1 in whatever part of the world they may have been1 have retained the square character 7with its various ,rabbinical modifications7 which they learned in ,chalda in the seventh century ,b4,c4 ,but the ,hebrew language never returned to the ,holy ,land4 ,hebrew1 as spoken among the ,samaritans1 underwent the same ,aramaisation as the language of the ,judans1 and from three or four centuries ,b4,c4 down to the eighth century of our era1 the language of all ,syria was ,syriac with local dialects1 and ,greek in the great cities4 ,the usual character in which ,syriac was written has already been mentioned1 but the ,samaritans wrote even their semi-,syriac speech in the old #bj;characters of their ,bible2 and there is a really ,samaritan ,pentateuch--different from the ,hebrew ,pentateuch in ,samaritan letters--which corresponds in ,samaritan literature to the ,chaldee ,targums of the ,jews4 ,none of the ,hebraeo-,aramaic dialects long survived in ,syria the conquest of the ,arabs4 ,syriac still lived on in ,western ,persia and in ,mongolia1 and in ,india for a time1 but only survived as a dead liturgical language4 ,chaldo-,hebraic made its way westwards to ,morocco1 ,italy1 ,spain and ,gaul4 ,the faithful in ,samaria1 now nearly extinct1 clung to their ,pentateuch and their religion through all vicissitudes1 and have never ceased to write the ,bible in the ,hebrew script of ancient ,palestine4 ,arabia4--,arabian writing before the time of ,mohammad is only known to us under the name of ,haurani and ,nabathan in the ,north1 of ,himyaritic in the ,south4 ,none of these scripts resembles the ,islamic characters called distinctively ,arabic4 ,the ,gospel-script 7,estrangelo7 of the ,syrians is the nearest of all the ,aramaic hands to that used by the earliest ,mohammadans1 which 7from its special cultivation in the town of ,cufa7 is called ,cufic4 ,but even here1 the resemblance is not so close as to make it improbable that there was a link between them in some lost script of pre-,christian days4 ,the ,cufic writing which prevailed for three centuries as the mode of writing the ,koran cannot strictly be shown to be the mother of the ,naskhi which replaced it and has flourished for a thousand years4 ,it is clearly older than the ,naskhi in its forms1 but the ,naskhi has been proved to have existed contemporaneously with the ,cufic almost from the beginning of ,mohammadanism4 ,after the third century of the ,hijra1 the ,cufic was only retained for ornamentation and head-lines4 ,by that time the ,arab conquests had created a vast ,mohammadan empire2 the ,syrians1 the ,persians1 and the ,egyptians were obliged to give up their old scripts1 and to accept that of their conquerors4 ,arabic writing occupied not only all #bathe seats in which ,phoenician letters had been used fifteen centuries before1 but even a far larger area4 ,the writing and the language were used and known from ,seville to the frontiers of ,india4 ,soon after1 ,india likewise fell a prey2 and ,arabic letters have been used there ever since by the ,mohammadan population4 ,the elegant script called ,talik1 which was peculiar to the ,persians 7but has been borrowed in ,india71 was developed in the fourteenth century4 ,it differs little1 except in gracefulness1 from the typical ,naskhi4 ,india and the further ,east4--,the characters in which the ,pracrit inscriptions of ,northern ,india were engraved on stone1 in the third century ,b4,c41 descended1 with considerable modifications of form1 to the various tribes of ,hindus who developed the modern languages of ,india1 now called ,hindi1 ,gujarati1 ,mahratti1 ,panjabi1 ,bengali4 ,all these languages are akin1 their differences being produced by segregation and by local contact with aboriginal or foreign populations4 ,their character two thousand years ago 7before local diversities were perpetuated in names7 is described by the term ,prakrit 7,natural7 as distinguished from the title given to another form of the language1 namely ,sanskrit 7,artificial7 which is believed to represent a far more ancient stage of ,indian speech4 ,in this artificial language the earliest traditions and literature of the ,hindo-,aryan race are preserved1 but it is supposed to have died out of speech 7if ever it was spoken7 several centuries before the ,christian era4 ,however that may be1 we have no monument or record to show that it was written till the tenth century after ,christ1 and the ,sanscrit alphabet is undeniably not more than eight or nine centuries old1 having been artificially elaborated from the much simpler script of ,asoka's time4 ,the graphic systems of ,southern ,india1 ,ceylon1 ,thibet1 ,burma1 and ,siam were all derived from the script of ,aryan ,india after ,budhism had begun to spread4 #bb;,in ,north-,eastern ,asia1 the ,mongolian script 7and out of it1 the ,manchurian7 were formed from the writing of the ,nestorian ,christians who carried their ,syriac books to the frontiers of ,china4 ,spain and ,gaul under the ,romans ,it has been already said that ,punic settlements were made in ,spain probably as far back as the seventh century ,b4,c4 ,to the ,phoenicians or ,carthaginians we may ascribe the introduction of letters and their application to coins and inscriptions1 not only in the ,punic language of the men who held ,cadiz1 ,carthagena1 and ,barcelona1 but also in the ,iberian and ,celtiberian language of native princes4 ,strabo says that the ,turdetani 7of the present ,andalusia7 boasted the possession of historical and poetical books of immense age in their own language2 but when he was writing1 about the time of the birth of ,christ1 they were all ,romanised and unable to speak any other tongue than ,latin4 ,there exists1 however1 a great quantity of coins struck in ,spain between #djj ,b4,c4 and the time of ,augustus4 ,there are three varieties 7omitting those of ,greek colonies in ,aragon71 namely1 those in ,punic language and ,punic letters1 those with ,iberian names in ,punic letters1 and those with ,celtiberian names in modified ,punic letters4 ,the later ,iberian and ,celtiberian have sometimes ,latin inscriptions added to the native ones4 ,in the first century after ,christ1 the whole of ,spain was virtually ,romanised4 ,the ,transalpine ,gauls retained their own speech longer than the ,spaniards did theirs1 because the conquest was later2 but the people of ,cisalpine ,gaul were ,romanised even earlier than the ,spaniards4 ,the independence of ,marseilles as a ,greek republic came to an end in the first century of the ,roman empire1 and the ,greek language probably died out in a few generations4 ,then1 no doubt1 ,roman letters took the place of the ,greek1 which1 as ,csar said1 were used by the ,gauls in his time4 ,henceforward1 till the fifth century1 ,spain and #bc;,gaul were simply outlying provinces of the empire1 without anything in literature or calligraphy to distinguish their people from the ,romanised ,italians4 ,it was not till the sixth century1 when the ,gothic kingdom had become a stable institution1 that anything like a local fashion of calligraphy began to develop itself in ,spain4 ,gaul was similarly affected by the influx first of the ,visigoths1 then of the ,franks4 ,influence of the ,bible upon writing ,the events which led to the compilation of the ,gospels were of the greatest moment in the history of writing4 ,the educational influence of the ,bible--apart entirely from its claims to supernatural importance--in spreading the use of letters and creating schools for the study of reading and writing1 has been incalculable4 ,the historical and religious traditions of the ,jews would probably have had but little effect upon the world1 if the result of the various wars by which ,syria was so often desolated had not been to expatriate the chosen people of the ,lord4 ,a large ,jewish population occupied ,northern ,egypt at the time when ,alexander's conquests revolutionised the old world4 ,the establishment of ,greek dynasties in that country and in ,syria speedily ,hellenised the upper classes and the citizens in both2 and the linguistic subjugation of the ,jews in ,egypt was even more complete than that of their old masters4 ,their peculiar condition facilitated a change2 for while they possessed the sacred book of the ,law of their forefathers in a language that had been dead for centuries1 they had only translations in the language of the country of their former exile 7,chalda72 and though they had the commercial qualification of bilingualism1 their ,chaldee and their ,egyptian were probably equally weak4 ,two generations were enough to ,hellenise them1 and seventy years after ,alexander's death1 the ,bible was introduced to the knowledge of the ,greek world in an edition destined to render the old ,hebrew #bdscripture intelligible to ,egyptian and ,syrian ,jews4 ,this fortunate circumstance drew a number of people into the ,elohistic fold who would never otherwise have been found there2 and had no small influence in bringing about the social and moral revolution which signalised the beginning of our era4 ,the ,septuagint must remain the true ,bible of ,christendom until the ,hebrew text of the pr-,christian ages is discovered4 ,next to it in importance is the ,syriac ,bible1 and next to that1 the ,latin ,vulgate4 ,all three indicate the prior existence of a ,hebrew original2 but to obtain a critically exact knowledge of what that original was at the time of ,alexander the ,great1 one must resort to the ,septuagint2 at the time of ,christ1 to the ,syriac2 and at the time of the ,emperor ,julian1 to the ,vulgate4 ,the ,hebrew text1 as we now have it1 underwent so many changes and corruptions during the first few centuries of the growth of ,christianity as a younger rival to ,judaism1 that even the oldest ,hebrew ,,mss4 are precluded by their comparative modernity from claiming equal importance with the three versions referred to4 ,the multiplication of copies of the ,syriac ,scriptures1 between the first century after ,christ and the seventh1 must have been very great2 that of the ,greek ,bible and ,testament1 from the first to the fourteenth century1 still greater2 and that of the ,latin ,vulgate1 from the fifth to the fifteenth1 enormous4 ,the early missionaries of the ,christian ,church were ,hellenised ,syrians or ,egyptians1 and they stamped the art of their native countries upon the new ,biblical literature in every country except ,italy4 ,italy was the exception1 simply because it was the centre of political power and of ,grco-,roman culture1 and thus too learned and too fastidious to accept a new popular religion or an inferior type of ornamental art4 ,but all the external provinces of the ,empire underwent the influence of the enthusiastic proselytizers1 and even ,byzantium succumbed to it after the ,empire of the ,west had been extinguished4 ,the types of ornament created for the embellishment of ,bibles were ,egyptian in #be;design and colouring2 and this is the reason why the pictures in all the early examples of book-illustration in the ,west are supposed to have a ,byzantine aspect2 the fact being that while classical art faded away almost with paganism in ,italy and ,hellas1 the ,oriental substitute1 which reigned from ,asia ,minor to ,ireland1 was preserved in ,byzantium till the downfall of the ,greek empire4 ,a few belated specimens of degenerate classical ornament are found to represent the ages between ,constantine and ,charles the ,great2 but in general terms it may be said that ,roman book-illustration died out in the fourth century4 ,it came to life again1 but in utter metamorphosis1 in the decorated ,irish books of the sixth-seventh century1 which were really the first examples of the medival art of illumination4 ,the ,coptic alphabet and the ,gothic alphabet were two late and artificial inventions1 due entirely to a holy rage for producing the ,bible in the language of the ,egyptians and the ,goths4 ,the two ,slavonic alphabets likewise were late scripts1 invented for the purpose of translating the ,bible into ,slovene4 ,the ,armenian alphabet 7and out of it the ,georgian7 had a similar origin1 and seems to have had some relationship to the ,slav ,glagolitic4 ,they are both attributed to the fifth century4 ,writing in ,italy during the first five centuries of the ,christian era ,we have not as full a knowledge as could be wished for of the ordinary styles of writing under the ,roman empire4 ,the books of the fourth and fifth centuries which are extant show that calligraphy was then flourishing in great splendour1 so far as capitals and uncials were concerned2 and the coins and inscriptions of the three preceding centuries show us ,roman capitals at their best4 ,that rustic capitals were used in the first century is proved by the ,herculanean remains1 and that the fashion of writing in square capitals1 #bfrustic capitals1 and uncials was still practised in ,italy down to the eighth century1 we have sufficient grounds for knowing4 ,but as to the style of handwriting used in books of which editions of perhaps a few hundred copies were issued--such1 for example1 as the edition of his own epigrams which ,martial found at ,lyons--we can only form conjectures4 ,the semi-uncials of the fifth and sixth centuries1 which grew into the minuscules of the seventh and eighth1 must have been as much needed in the first century as the sixth1 but there is no trace of them4 ,the ,roman cursive hand1 upright or backsloped1 that appears in the few extant tablets and wall-inscriptions of the first and second centuries1 would have been too difficult for the readers who bought books to enjoy them1 and would assuredly have served as an obstacle to their sale4 ,it resembles rather the charter hand of later days than the minuscule writing of books1 but the letters are unconnected1 and there is no trace of any attempt at neatness4 ,it is indeed almost illegible1 without slow and painful decipherment4 ,one striking peculiarity is the b1 which has frequently the shape of d1 a form that was retained in the official diplomatic hand of the fifth century4 ,such as it was1 however1 the cursive hand would have had considerable influence in shaping the semi-uncial or minuscule writing1 which must have existed before it was adopted by the ,irish in the fifth century and most other barbarians in the sixth4 ,that semi-uncial1 although we find no examples of its use in the empire before the end of the fifth century1 had evidently been the immediate parent of the first ,irish1 which only differs from it in the superior evenness and regularity of the latter4 ,it included the g1 r1 s1 t1 which are usually looked upon as special and characteristic letters of the ,irish and ,anglo-,saxon alphabet4 ,after the fifth century ,italy ceased to be entirely ,roman4 ,in ,rome itself1 and in the region subject to the ,popes1 the production of fine manuscripts of the old style in capitals and uncials still went on1 sometimes written in gold #bg;and on purple vellum2 and the modified cursive hand above referred was applied to the writing of books as well as the writing of despatches4 ,when this custom began is just what we should like to know1 because it would give us the true origin of all modern minuscule writing or printing4 ,a specimen1 dating from the seventh century1 is given in the ,palographical ,society's facsimiles1 which is clearly the type that was followed and improved upon in ,central ,france1 in the ,caroline period4 ,carelessly written as it seems1 it indicates that a considerable length of time had elapsed since the pen had been trained to form alternate light and heavy strokes1 and to give to the curves of the letters an agreeable roundness1 which was wholly missing in the earlier ,roman cursive4 ,it does not seem unreasonable to suppose that such writing was used in books long before the arrival of the fifth century2 but there is no proof accessible4 ,the ,british ,isles during the ,roman period ,it would have been correct enough to bracket ,britain along with ,spain and ,gaul in a preceding paragraph1 but we cannot venture to claim for this country any knowledge of writing before the arrival of the ,romans4 ,it is true that a great part of the south of the island was ,gaulish1 and that the ,gauls of ,gaul1 who knew how to write1 were in intimate relations with the ,britons4 ,britania was probably a land of ,celtiberian population like ,spain1 but without such traditions as the ,turdetani4 ,it was ,romanised very effectively all over the south1 and with the ,latin language the people used ,latin letters like their fellows in ,gaul and ,spain4 ,like other ,roman citizens1 the ,britons became ,christians1 underwent subjugation by pagan barbarians1 and lost their lives or their ,latinity1 those who escaped massacre being absorbed by the invaders4 ,so far as writing is concerned1 they have left nothing beyond some lapidar inscriptions2 but these and whatever else they #bhproduced in the form of ,,mss4 during the first four centuries were no doubt as wholly ,roman as anything of the kind in ,italy4 ,at so short a distance from the shores of ,roman ,britain1 it is not likely that the ,irish remained letterless till the fifth century of the ,christian era4 ,it is almost certain that the labours of ,st4 ,patrick 7about the middle of that century7 were but complementary to those of earlier missionaries2 and that the adoption of the ,roman alphabet in ,ireland may be dated from the end of the fourth or the beginning of the fifth century4 ,the consummate ornamental beauty of the ,,mss4 executed in ,ireland during the seventh century1 and the testimony given by ,st4 ,adamnan 7writing about ,a4,d4 #fgj7 to the expertness of ,st4 ,columba as a calligrapher 7about #eej7 tend to prove that the art had been practised for a long time before it attained to such excellence4 ,the particular merit of the ,irish is that they seem to have developed 7out of ,roman semi-uncials7 a handsome minuscule form of writing earlier than any other people4 ,the cursive of the ,romans had always been an ugly and ill-decipherable script2 and it was only in the seventh century that even the ,italians1 under barbarian pressure1 evolved a fairly good readable minuscule4 ,the minuscules of ,gaul and ,western ,germany1 called ,merowingian1 were still in a formless and primitive rudeness at the time when the ,irish had already attained the elegance of practised penmanship4 ,the ,goths have next to be mentioned1 as they and the ,irish were the only two barbarian nations that adopted the ,grco-,roman alphabet before the break-up of the ,roman empire4 ,the ,goths and ,germans ,the people who in the fourth century after ,christ called themselves ,gut-thiuda1 i4e4 ,goth-people1 had been for many centuries the most easterly branch of the ,germanic race4 #bi;,down at least to the second century ,b4,c4 their tribes occupied the regions bordering on the ,vistula and the ,dniester1 extending from the ,bay of ,dantzig to the ,black ,sea4 ,at the north-western end of the line they were in the time of ,tacitus known as ,guthones2 those at the other end were called ,bastarn by ,polybius and ,strabo1 and recognised as ,germans4 ,the latter people were the first of their race to become acquainted with civilisation4 ,the amber-trade was already in the time of ,herodotus a vigorous traffic1 carried on between the ,baltic and the ,greek settlements on the ,euxine4 ,it passed through the lands of the ,guthones and the ,bastarn1 and led undoubtedly to the growth of the form of notation called ,runes4 ,the ,runic alphabet1 inscriptions in which are numerous in ,scandinavia1 was evidently deformed from the ,greek1 and must have originated about the ,dniester some five or six centuries before ,christ4 ,as time went on1 that alphabet naturally drifted further and further north2 the ,goths and ,germans1 nearest to the ,greeks1 having1 of course1 less need of it according as their knowledge increased4 ,from the shores of the ,baltic it was carried into ,scandinavia1 and became the earliest form of writing in ,northern ,europe4 ,mr4 ,george ,stephens claims for the oldest of the extant ,norse ,runes an antiquity exceeding that of our era1 but a more moderate ,scandinavian writer sets the earliest date at about ,a4,d4 #cjj4 ,in any case1 it must be allowed that some form of writing was obtained by ,gothic tribes from ,greek traders before the time of ,christ1 and that it afterwards found a home in ,denmark1 ,sweden1 and ,norway4 ,the name of ,runes is equivalent to that of ciphers or riddles or mysteries1 and we may infer that its real origin was in the cutting of strokes to express numbers4 ,runic letters never reached the pen-and-ink stage of other alphabets1 and their records are hardly more than inscriptions upon tombstones4 ,for that and similar purposes they continued to be occasionally employed1 both in ,england and ,scandinavia1 long after the #cjuse of ,roman or modified ,roman letters had been established in all countries4 ,the singular variations in form and number and value between runes of different dates and different places1 are easily accounted for by the circumstance that there can have been no continuous practise of such inscriptions in any country in which ,christianity had already established a simpler script4 ,runes do not seem to have come into use among the ,western ,germans1 that is1 the tribes which occupied the region which we now call ,germany4 ,hrabanus ,maurus1 in the tenth century1 wrote about the runes of the ,marcomanni1 and gave figures of them4 ,this has led ,german writers to assert the existence of ,runic letters among the ,suevi in the early days of the ,roman empire2 but ,hrabanus adds to ,marcomanni the gloss quos nos ,northmannos vocamus4 ,his ,marcomanni were not the ,marchmen of the ,roman period4 ,bede is also said to have formulated a list of the runes of the ,northmen4 ,one reason which retarded the educational advancement of the ,western ,germans was that they never came into contact with the ,romans till the beginning of the first century ,b4,c41 and even then only for a short time1 in the invasion of the republic by the ,cimbri and ,teutones4 ,they were shut away from the ,roman frontiers by the buffer states of ,celtic countries1 and it was only after the conquest of ,gaul1 ,rhtia1 and ,noricum that the ,romans came into continuous conflict with ,marcomanni and ,suevi4 ,it was ,csar who first made the name of ,germani historical1 and ,tacitus who invented ,germania as the name of the country4 ,the name ,germani is1 as ,zeuss suggests1 ,gallic for ,neighbours1 and was pronounced ,grmani by the ,gauls1 who had first been asked by the ,romans how their neighbours were called4 ,it is curious that even in this country the ,britons called the invading ,english ,garmani1 by what ,bede supposed to be a corruption of speech4 7,the ,celts in later days were not ,latinised ,britons1 and knew nothing of #ca;,germans4 ,they made no distinction between ,angles1 ,saxons1 and ,jutes1 but called them all ,saxons47 ,the name by which the ,germans call themselves is not a race name1 but merely the adjective meaning national1 native1 vernacular4 ,just as the ,italians afterwards used the phrase in volgare to mean in ,italian1 as distinguished from ,latin1 so the ,germans had the word diutisc or thiutisc 7deutsch7 to mean vulgar1 as opposed to walahisc or walesc 7welsch71 which meant ,latin4 ,the two adjectives became in time proper names1 with the sense of ,german and ,roman4 ,the ,western ,germans had nothing to do with writing till they conquered the ,welshmen of ,gaul4 ,consequently1 we proceed to the ,gothic alphabet4 ,after repeated attacks on the ,roman empire in the third century1 and repeated defeats1 the ,goths had extended their seats southwards1 and were resident1 in a partly ,christianised state1 in the lands north and south of the ,danube4 ,wulfila1 or ,ulfila1 a ,goth1 said to have been born in ,cappadocia1 a man of great ability1 who was able to preach in ,gothic1 in ,greek1 and in ,latin1 thought the time had come to ,christianise his countrymen completely4 ,for that purpose he translated the ,bible into the ,gothic language1 and created an uncial alphabet1 derived partly from ,greek1 partly from ,latin1 and partly from ,runic4 ,of his twenty-seven letters1 two are merely numerals4 ,in the twenty-five that were used for writing1 the c 7g71 d1 l1 p1 and ch have their ,greek uncial shapes1 the a1 b1 e1 f1 h1 i1 k1 m1 n1 r1 s1 t1 and z may be called ,latin uncials2 the q resembles our capital u1 but is plainly an adaptation of the ,greek koppa1 the th seems to be modified from the ,greek ph1 but may have easily been the ,greek th2 a ,roman ,g is inserted in the alphabet in the place of the ,greek ,ksi1 and seems to have been used as gh or ,y consonant2 a ,greek ,y is used for the ,runic angular ,p which represented the ,teutonic w2 an o with a dot in the centre stood for hw2 and the vowels ,o and ,u appear as ,symbol3 #h without bottom half-loop and ,symbol3 inverted ,u4 ,the ,gothic th1 hw1 w1 o1 #cb;and u are found in the ,runic alphabet1 from which ,ulfila must have borrowed them4 ,so far as it was possible to him he avoided the letters of his pagan ancestors1 but for certain sounds existing in ,gothic1 and not in ,greek or ,latin1 he was compelled to fall back upon the ,runes4 ,just in a similar way1 the ,anglo-,saxons two hundred years later1 when adopting the ,irish-,roman alphabet1 were obliged to add the necessary th and w from the same ,runic source4 ,the ,gothic letters of ,ulfila were used for about two centuries by the so-called ,ostrogoths1 all the extant manuscripts of the ,gothic ,bible having been written in ,italy in the sixth century1 the famous ,silver ,gospels of ,stockholm included4 ,of the ,visigoths who had preceded the ,ostrogoths in ,italy1 but gone onward thence to fix their rule in ,southern ,gaul and ,spain1 we have nothing to show that they ever made use of the ,ulphilan alphabet4 ,their coins of the sixth and seventh centuries bear inscriptions in debased ,roman capitals2 and the so-called ,visigothic writing in manuscripts of the eighth to the twelfth centuries is simply ,spanish-,roman4 ,the use1 in modern times1 of the word ,gothic to indicate special forms of writing and architecture is very absurd1 but the phrase has become convenient4 ,in so far as writing is concerned1 we may continue to use the word gothic 7with a small g7 to denote the angular black letter of the fourteenth1 fifteenth1 and sixteenth centuries4 ,irish and ,british writing ,of the various species of national writing which were evolved from ,roman calligraphy1 and which1 from the seventh century onwards1 are divided by palographers into ,lombardic and ,visigothic1 ,frankish 7,merowingian71 and ,irish 7,hibernian and ,anglo-,saxon71 the ,irish was probably the first to attain a distinct type of its own4 ,there would be #cc;inherent probability in the notion that the ,irish alphabet and the ,irish style of ornament were created in ,britain and transferred to ,ireland in the fifth century when the ,english arrived4 ,professor ,westwood seemed to regard the idea with favour but hesitated in giving it full expression4 ,he says it may be observed that the earliest of the sculptured ,christian stones of ,wales exhibit the same system of ornamentation1 as well as the same style of writing1 as the ,irish ,,mss4 which are1 in all probability1 of a somewhat more recent date4 ,one will naturally seek to test the value of this observation by examining the writer's ,lapidarium ,walli4 ,in that work1 however1 no substantiation will be found4 ,there are a couple of instances in which sculptured stones bearing names1 which are assigned by ,bishop ,stubbs to the ninth century1 are said by ,prof4 ,westwood to be perhaps of the sixth or seventh2 and that is all4 ,on the contrary1 the one salient fact observable in the ,lapidarium is1 that all the inscriptions of the ,roman and early post-,roman time are in pure ,roman capitals1 while the inscriptions upon sculptured stones in minuscules resembling the ,irish alphabet1 all belong to the period when the ,angles and ,saxons were in full possession of ,irish calligraphic and artistic models--that is1 after the seventh century4 ,the ,britons of the fifth century1 at least all over the ,southern half of the island1 were a ,romanised people as much as the ,gauls1 and it would be ridiculous to expect ,celtic provincial art in the home of ,roman culture4 ,they were exterminated or absorbed in the east and middle of the island by the ,germanic invaders1 and they were harried out of the west by their ,cumri kindred from the north1 and by pirate ,scots from ,ireland4 ,the latter part of the fifth century and the whole of the sixth and part of the seventh1 formed a period during which the inhabitants of ,cambria can have produced little or nothing in the way of letters or art4 ,it was probably not till the beginning of the eighth century that the ,cumri began to identify themselves with the #cd;ancient ,britons1 and to gather up the legends and historical traditions of the ,british remnant as their own4 ,there is a clear testimony that the ,cumri and the ,britons were closely akin as a race1 but not identical1 in the fact that names beginning with ,v in ,british use down to the fifth century are found to begin with ,gu 7,gw7 in the language of the ,welsh4 ,guend and ,vend were of course two phases of an old ,celtic word1 but the former is necessarily the older4 ,consequently the people who have used ,gw from the fifth to the nineteenth century cannot be the same as those who had already reached the ,v-stage in the first century4 ,they were close relatives undoubtedly1 but had little in common beyond their racial affinity and the original homogeneity of their speech4 ,it may be surmised that the ,briton found no more kindness in his ,cumric stepbrother1 or his ,irish cousin1 than in the fierce strangers who called him a ,welshman 7because they found him talking ,welsh1 i4e4 ,latin74 ,bede1 in spite of his ,romanist tendency1 and his ,romanist aversion to the practice of the ,celtic church with regard to the ,paschal festival and the tonsure1 gives clear evidence that in the middle of the seventh century many ,englishmen of the noble and the meaner sort resorted to ,ireland1 and dwelt there for the purpose either of study or of leading a religious life 7divin lectionis vel continentioris vit grati71 and states that the ,scots received them all most willingly1 giving them their daily food without charge1 also books for reading1 and gratuitous instruction4 ,the ,angles were apt pupils4 ,they learned to write and ornament books of their own in the ,irish manner1 and they had ,irish monks in their new monasteries who fostered the art4 ,by the close of the seventh century1 there were expert penmen among the ,anglian monks1 and during the eighth century1 although the very close adherence to ,irish models is the feature of most of the ornamental manuscripts1 they began to strike out a new and characteristic line of their own in which they soon surpassed their masters4 ,this was in #ce;figure-drawing1 in miniatures painted with a mastery of design which was altogether unknown to the ,irish4 ,the heads or figures which appeared in ,irish illuminations were merely accessory and subordinate to the scheme of decoration1 utterly contemptible as delineations of human form4 ,in the ,anglo-,saxon miniatures of the period which began--say about #gej and continued to the eleventh century1 there is a distinct national school1 in which the over-anxious treatment of draperies and the striking addiction to light green pigment1 are prominent characteristics4 ,the style gives a sort of general impression that it had been formed upon a ,byzantine model1 but the probability is that the later classical survival in ,italy in the seventh century had helped to form the ,anglo-,saxon taste as well as the taste of the ,carolingian school4 ,a similar1 but ruder1 expression of the same ,anglo-,saxon method of illustration appeared in ,german work of the tenth and eleventh centuries2 and as this had its parentage in the ,french ,carolingian art of the ninth century1 we may suspect that the tendency which brought that art to its perfection in the time of ,charles the ,bald1 had begun in ,gaul before the time of ,charles the ,great1 that is1 earlier than the usual date of its sudden genesis4 ,this conjecture would make the production of books illustrated with miniatures synchronise in ,france and ,england1 and thus obviate the difficulty of supposing that the ,anglo-,saxons invented the art and carried it to perfection within a century of their learning how to write4 ,it is sufficient glory for them to have converted the artistic movement of the time into a national school of painting unmistakable with any other1 at a time when the calligraphical schools of central and ,southern ,france1 under an enlightened ,frankish emperor1 and with far superior opportunities1 were labouring for a ,gallo-,roman renaissance4 #cf,origin of ,medival ,illumination ,books in the classical period had of course been ornamented with illustrations1 but the illumination of books 7in the medival sense7 did not originate with the ,grco-,roman calligraphers of the ,empire4 ,we cannot suppose that it sprang into life in ,ireland1 but certainly its first ,european manifestation was in ,irish ,,mss41 and the art had not been received by the ,irish from any of the ,european nations4 ,the only alternative is1 however1 far fetched1 that ,christian missionaries from the ,east 7or with ,eastern training7 had preceded ,st4 ,patrick and brought with them those characteristics of ,syro-,egyptian art which are traceable alike in ,irish and in ,byzantine work4 ,the documentary period of writing in ,ireland is of course later than the actual practice of the art in that country1 but it is earlier than amongst any other of the unromanised barbarians4 ,adamnan1 writing about ,a4,d4 #fgj1 relates the life of ,st4 ,columba 7dead in #eih7 and describes the writing materials which that saint had used in his scriptorium in the island of ,hy4 ,as he had learned to write in ,ireland and had begun his priestly career there before #edj1 we may place the historically ascertainable use of writing in ,ireland as beginning with the early years of the sixth century4 ,irish monks carried the art to ,britain1 to ,gaul1 to ,germany2 and those elaborate and intricate patterns to which the ,french give the names of lettres perles1 lettres brodes1 spirales1 noeuds1 et entrelacs1 initiales ophiomorphiques1 ichthyomorphiques1 c41 and which they claim as indigenous productions of ,carolingian ,france in the early part of the ninth century--were fruits of the teaching of ,irish missionaries1 in the houses which they founded in ,britain and all over the continent in the seventh century4 ,some of the remarks in the preceding section will be found in strong disagreement with the authority of ,professor #cg,westwood1 whose work on the ,anglo-,saxon and ,irish miniatures is such a splendid testimony to his zeal and ability4 ,his conjectural dates are1 however1 frequently misleading4 ,an instance is that of the so-called ,bible of ,st4 ,gregory1 figured on his plates #ad1 #ae4 ,in the text he says that ,sir ,frederick ,madden had declared the ,,ms4 to be unquestionably of the eighth century1 but he prefers to call it of the seventh1 in agreement with ,casley and ,astle 7who thought so in the last century674 ,he ought to have accepted the opinion of a recognised master in palography like ,sir ,frederick1 so far as the writing is concerned1 in preference to that of two men living at a time before the science had attained anything like exactness in ,england4 ,he ought also to have seen or felt1 while making his elaborate facsimile1 that the nearest parallel to the style of illumination of his first page of ,luke is to be found in ,carolingian work executed about #hjj2 and that no great space of time could separate the two examples4 ,the ,english work was probably the earlier1 but it can hardly have been accomplished before #ggj4 ,the purely ,irish patterns in the columns supporting the arch1 with the excellent picture of ,st4 ,luke that surmounts it1 prove by their combination that the work is ,anglo-,saxon of its second and finer period1 that is after the phase in which it was merely and wholly imitative of the ,irish4 ,with these considerations in view1 and a remembrance of ,bede's words quoted above in relation to ,anglian education in ,ireland about ,a4,d4 #fej1 the assignment of the ,bible of ,st4 ,gregory to the seventh century is a pure absurdity4--,again1 ,westwood's facsimile from the ,golden ,gospels of ,stockholm1 bears the attribution ,sixth ,century8 ,ninth ,century8 while its position in the book1 as the first plate1 tends to show that ,professor ,westwood leaned to the earlier date4 ,yet the book is unquestionably not ,irish2 its artistic illustration is a singularly fine development of ,anglo-,saxon art--think of ,anglo-,saxon art and chrysography in the sixth century6 ,the writing cannot be #chmistaken for ,roman uncials of the sixth century2 it is plainly in ,carolingian uncials of the latter half of the eighth4 ,the book seems to have been illustrated by an ,anglian hand1 and written by a ,frankish one1--probably on the continent rather than in ,england4 ,books in ,irish or ,saxon-,irish writing are found all over the continent4 ,as they were written in monasteries founded by ,irish missionaries during the seventh and eighth centuries1 they only indicate that a succession of ,irish or of ,saxon monks continued to make their way for a considerable period to ,france1 ,germany1 and ,italy4 ,the writing can hardly be said to have left any traces in the various national hands of those countries1 but the ,irish house at ,bobbio probably transmitted the use of the interlaced ornamentation which revived in ,italy several centuries later4 ,most of the motifs of decoration in the illuminated ,carolingian1 ,visigothic1 and ,lombardic ,,ms4 were derived from the ,irish methods of ornamentation introduced through monastic houses and schools established by ,irish monks on the continent4 ,french writers deny their indebtedness to foreigners for it1 since1 as they say1 the pattern was always at hand in the tessellated and mosaic pavements of ,gallo-,roman architecture4 ,but there is something of unnecessary vanity in the denial4 ,the ,irish ,,mss4 of the seventh century are the first in ,europe which contain decorative initials of the kind4 ,this fact is indisputable1 and is not affected by the question of original derivation1 which in my opinion is to be sought for in the east among those ,hellenised ,syrians and ,egyptians who were the propagators of ,christian art as well as ,christian religion in the west4 ,merowingian1 ,lombardic1 ,visigothic ,these names1 applied to varying styles of writing1 are without historical exactness4 ,roughly speaking1 the first #cimeans the debased ,roman used in ,gaul and ,western ,germany from the sixth to the eighth century1 the second was the script of the larger part of ,italy 7but chiefly the east and the south7 between the ninth and the twelfth centuries1 the third was the national hand of ,spain and ,languedoc during the eighth to the twelfth century4 ,the names are based upon erroneous historical assumptions4 ,the ,frankish kings1 supposed to be descended from ,merowig1 carried with them across the ,rhine no graphic system whatever4 ,they found in ,gaul the identical styles of writing which were used in ,italy1 and such of their people as gave up the trade of warriors to assume that of clerics and councillors1 were obliged to learn the arts of the ,gauls4 ,the circumstances under which the new kingdom was established as a permanent institution1 were not such as to make the ,franks a nation of penmen2 and the influence of their bad taste in calligraphy could hardly have been felt till the beginning of the seventh century4 ,their ,gallic underlings continued to write as before1 but in the absence of enlightened patronage1 the schools of art no longer produced good work1 except in the monasteries of the ,provincia ,romana1 where less deterioration took place than elsewhere4 ,the ,frankish monarchy was so widely extended throughout the territories stretching from the ,loire to the ,main1 and along the whole course of the ,rhine from south to north1 even in ,merovingian times1 that the use of the word to designate a special style of writing is hardly desirable4 ,it is probable enough that in the seventh century and the early part of the eighth a kind of uniformity existed in the writing used in all the region between ,paris and ,mentz1 but it was nothing else than ,roman uncials1 semiuncials1 and minuscules written in more or less cramped and graceless fashion2 varying only in the degree of badness according to the locality4 ,it is ,roman cacography with a ,germanic stamp upon it4 ,there was a decided improvement in it when the eighth century was in progress4 #dj,the ,lombardic hand is also a ,roman hand as written by or for barbarians who lived nearer to the centre of civilisation than the ,franks did4 ,to justify its name it would be necessary to show that it originated and was practised in the region we call ,lombardy in the seventh century4 ,there is1 however1 no trace of its existence before the ninth century1 and very little show of its having been used to any extent in ,cisalpine ,gaul4 ,most of the surviving examples of its employment as a national or local script indicate ,eastern and ,southern ,italy as its home during the ninth to the twelfth century2 while most of the manuscripts produced in ,lombardy and northern ,italy during that time belong rather to the ,carolingian type4 ,in fact1 the ,carolingian minuscule1 the ,visigothic minuscule1 and the ,lombardic minuscule all show at their beginning so much similarity that we look for examples of the latter two sufficiently early to decide a doubt which arises--which of the three was the fountain head of modern letters4 ,the chief marks of distinction in the ,lombardic through its whole career are the t shaped nearly like a1 and the a shaped like cc4 ,the ,visigothic t is identical with the ,lombardic2 and in the a there is so little unlikeness that the form of the letter seems to be something halfway between u and cc4 7,it is equivalent to cc without their beaks or initial knobs47 ,the circumstance that two scripts so widely removed in place should retain common peculiarities1 down to the very end of their severed existence1 leads to a suspicion that the so-called ,lombardic was probably a post-,ulfilan ,ostrogothic4 ,the peculiarities referred to1 and some others which need not be specialised1 are also found in the ,merowing writing of books produced west of the ,rhine in the seventh century4 ,now as ,carolingian writing is quite free from these peculiarities1 we can safely conclude that the ,lombardic and the ,visigothic are both older than the time of ,charles the ,great4 ,it is usually supposed by those who see the difficulty attaching to the use of the name ,lombardic1 that the mode #daof writing so styled was used in the kingdom of the ,longbeards1 but died out in its chief home after the conquest by the ,franks1 and only maintained a continued existence in the ,neapolitan duchies held by princes of ,lombardic origin4 ,the suspicion hinted at above becomes stronger when we review these facts4 ,the ,lombards were a far rougher and more uncultivated race than the ,goths1 and found a ,gothic-,roman script in use in ,italy when they entered to destroy the kingdom of ,theodoric4 ,it was probably in ,ravenna that the so-called ,lombardic minuscule had its seat during the sixth century1 side by side with the declining ,gothic uncial of ,wulfila4 ,from ,ravenna1 its spread over the east and south of ,italy would be much more easily effected than from ,milan or ,pavia2 and its undeniable similarity to the ,visigothic script of ,spain leads to the belief that these two were the real ,gothic writing of the early ,middle ,ages1 as distinguished from the ,moesian alphabet1 which cannot have endured much longer than the reign of ,theodoric himself4 ,the hand which is called broken ,lombard belongs to a later time4 ,its characteristic is an attempt to produce an ornamental wavy effect by suspending the weight of the pen-stroke in the middle of each descent1 but the forms of the letters remain unchanged4 ,it was a fashion of ,neapolitan writing in the eleventh and twelfth centuries1 and seems to correspond in its own school with that tendency in the schools of northern countries which produced the angular gothic of the thirteenth4 ,as has been remarked in another paragraph1 the ,lombardic flourished even in ,italy1 side by side with the pure ,carolingian1 which had become the most favoured of all handwritings since the ,empire of the ,west was renewed in the family of ,charles the ,great4 ,the ,carolingian1 however1 seems to have encroached to no more southerly point than ,rome itself1 leaving all the region beyond to its ,lombardic rival4 ,of the ,visigothic1 as of the ,lombardic1 it has to be said that1 so far as extant specimens are concerned1 it might #dbwell have been the offspring of the ,carolingian1 rather than an elder form of writing4 ,its kinship1 however1 to ,merowingian and ,lombardic is undeniable1 and there is a very fair show of probability that the ,visigoths had something to do with it1 notwithstanding the fact that we only know it in examples later than the destruction of the ,gothic monarchy in ,spain4 ,what the term ,visigothic means we do not know4 ,most people think it meant ,west ,gothic1 and that is how it was interpreted by ,jornandes1 who1 as an ,italian ,ostrogoth of the sixth century1 ought to have been capable of understanding the sense of the word4 ,it is1 however1 very uncertain2 for ,jornandes1 though intelligent and well-informed1 was not impeccable even as regards his ,gothic kinsmen4 ,most of his knowledge was derived from his ,latin education1 and to him probably we owe a good many misconceptions1 arising from his acceptance of various geographical names in ,latin and ,greek writers as referring to his own people and their kindred4 ,nothing which he has said has had a more enduring influence upon opinion than the statement that ,scandinavia1 the vagina gentium1 had bred all the barbaric tribes which overpowered the ,roman empire4 ,of course1 he knew nothing of ,scandinavia beyond the vague facts that ,goths1 ,heruli1 ,burgundians1 ,lombards1 and ,cimbri inhabited the southern shores of the ,baltic1 and that there was a vast land beyond that sea4 ,everything that descended from the north seemed to have come down from ,scania1 or ,scandinavia4 ,he did not know1 as we do1 that the climate of ,scandinavia must have been at that time much more severe than now1 and that the population of ,norway1 ,sweden1 and ,denmark cannot have reached in the fourth and fifth centuries to anything like its present numbers4 ,the movements of that age1 which carried millions of warriors to ,greece1 ,italy1 ,france1 ,spain1 and ,africa1 represented a wave of emigration1 caused by an overflow of population1 beginning in the far ,east1 on the confines of ,china1 of which the typical originators1 so far as #dc;,europe is concerned1 were the ,huns4 ,no such overflow was possible from ,scandinavia4 ,the ,visigothic script had certainly not yet come into existence when the kingdom of ,alaric had its capital at ,toulouse in the fifth century4 ,after the ,franks had driven the ,goths southward1 and the monarchy was established in ,spain 7incorporating the ,suabians1 who had held a separate state in ,portugal71 we may suppose that the ,visigothic hand was derived from that of the ,ostrogoths1 and used in the service of the ,gothic monarchs until their dynasty was destroyed by the ,saracenic conquest in #gac4 ,from that time onwards to the twelfth century it was employed in all the ,christian lands of ,spain1 although1 as in ,italy1 the ,carolingian script began to be introduced in the ninth century4 ,the two kinds of writing went on side by side1 the ,carolingian always gaining ground as time went on1 until in the thirteenth century ,spain fell into line with the other countries of ,europe in adopting a sort of ,french angular gothic4 ,the ,carolingian ,renewal ,the renewal of art and learning in ,gaul in the second half of the eighth century is ascribed to the patronage of ,karl the ,great and his descendants4 ,he was a man of extraordinary gifts1 and few figures of equal majesty have ever appeared on the stage of history4 ,king of the ,franks and the ,lombards1 ,roman ,emperor of the ,west1 a great conqueror1 a wise statesman1 and a man of learning1 he has left his name even in the annals of palography4 ,it can hardly have been in the beautiful ,roman handwriting which is called after him that he transcribed the ,frankish ballads or set down the rules of ,frankish grammar1 as he is said to have done4 ,he was fond of practising with his pen1 but1 as ,eginhart says1 the study was begun too late in life to be cultivated with success4 ,he had excellent taste1 however1 #dd;and bestowed generous rewards upon the calligraphers who worked for him4 ,his usual home was at ,aachen1 and his palace there contained a library and a scriptorium1 in which scribes were always busy4 ,a greater school of calligraphy was in the ,abbey of ,st4 ,martin at ,tours1 directed by the famous ,alcuin1 under the ,emperor's patronage4 ,it was at ,tours1 undoubtedly1 that the ,carolingian writing reached the stage at which it became the model for all succeeding time1 and ,alcuin was almost certainly the man who introduced the ,irish-,saxon fashion of decorative ornament1 as practised in ,york when he resided there with ,archbishop ,egbert4 ,a great deal of the learning which 7with some latitude of phraseology7 has been attributed above to the ,emperor1 was due to the frequent lectures upon all branches of science which ,alcuin was in the habit of delivering when he and his patron were together--usually at ,aachen4 ,karl did not spend much of his leisure time in the ,france which regards him as her own prince4 ,he is believed to have founded the ,university of ,paris1 but he did not regard the city on the ,seine as equal to ,rome or ,arles4 ,it was not included in the twenty-one metropolitan cities of his empire4 ,wherever the movement arose which produced the beauty of ,carolingian work1 we can have no difficulty in declaring it to have been in central or ,southern ,france1 not in the ,rhenish territories4 ,that contemporary calligraphers would have followed the lead was to be expected1 whether they worked at ,aachen or at ,metz1 or at ,trier or elsewhere2 but the real perfection of the style must have been attained in those parts of ,france which were most nearly connected with ,provence4 ,the uncials of ,carolingian work were imitated from ,roman work of the fifth century1 the capitals from ,roman inscriptions of the empire1 and the minuscules were improved from the two contemporary ,italian scripts in which they were found1 that is the ,papal ,roman and the ,gotho-,lombard4 ,the art was cultivated 7and we may allow that it had been so cultivated for many years before ,alcuin's #de;arrival7 so carefully that a fine sthetic sense had arisen1 and every letter of all three kinds was drawn with an elegant simplicity and truth which the world has never ceased to admire4 ,the letters are upright and wholly without angularities1 and are quite free from the mannerisms by which in the two ,gothic hands of the time certain unessential portions of the outline were dwelt upon and made over-prominent1 to the deterioration of the graphic form4 ,fine as the writing is in the time of the great ,emperor1 it is still finer throughout the half century or so which followed his death1 in all the ,gallic centres4 ,at the same time1 the decoration of manuscripts1 otherwise remarkable for their calligraphical excellence1 with illuminated initials1 border ornamentation1 and miniatures resembling in character those of the ,anglo-,saxon school but infused to a greater degree with the feeling and the style of late classical art1 render the ,carolingian ,french school of the ninth century one of the most splendid in the history of palography4 ,the scripts of ,spain and ,italy lived on for centuries uncorrected in certain peculiarities by the example of ,carolingian writing1 but gradually drawing nearer1 and visibly improved in manner4 ,this was brought about by the introduction into both countries of pure ,carolingian work1 practised simultaneously with the native styles1 and constantly increasing in influence4 ,in ,england the ,carolingian type won but little ground1 notwithstanding the ,romanising tendencies of ,winchester and ,canterbury and the ,southern monasteries in general4 ,it was not till the tenth century that certain signs of ,carolingian influence are seen in the writing of ,latin charters1 and it was only in the twelfth century that the handwriting of ,northern ,france and of ,england began to take an identical character4 ,in ,germany1 of course1 ,carolingian writing was an inheritance1 but it was never cultivated with the same elegance as in ,france4 ,the letters began gradually to slope and grow #dfnarrow1 and to take small projections at the extremities which by and bye became medieval gothic forms4 ,a ,review at the standpoint of the ,ninth ,century ,the middle ages began with the establishment of barbarian monarchies over the area of the ,roman empire of the west2 and with the middle ages began the final and the most important chapter in the history of manuscripts4 ,the study of manuscripts1 for most persons1 is confined to the period between the twelfth century and the sixteenth2 since it is not given to everyone to make pilgrimages to the museums scattered over ,europe1 for the purpose of looking at the earlier and rarer examples of writing4 ,besides1 the chief interest of the study lies rather in the decoration than the calligraphy of manuscripts2 and it was not till the fourteenth century that the production of such work became so large and general as to leave a sufficient number of specimens readily accessible to modern inspection4 ,the history of illuminated manuscripts begins in ,ireland in the sixth century1 that first phase being the application to written books of a system of ,oriental decorative ornament which had previously been confined to architectural work4 ,it spread into ,england in the seventh century1 a little later into ,gaul and ,germany1 and a new phase began in the eighth century by a happy combination of ,romanesque pictorial design with the more purely decorative features of barbaric art4 ,in the ninth century ,england and central ,france were easily ahead of all the other barbarian states4 ,in ,germany1 in ,aquitaine1 in ,spain1 and in ,northern ,italy1 the same system was followed1 but with a prevailing stamp of barbarism1 especially in the design of the human figure1 which affords a striking contrast to the refined luxury of ,carolingian art and the more sober splendour of ,english work4 ,the only parallel was in ,byzantium and ,alexandria1 where a similar combination had led to a nearly similar #dg;effect1 with this difference however1 that the decorative illumination was a far less prominent feature than the pictorial designs4 ,roman ,italy and ,roman ,provence still kept aloof from the new movement4 ,the classical traditions which survived there permitted the production of ,,mss4 written in gold1 and perhaps also illustrated with pictures1 such as had constituted the splendour of books in the first five centuries2 but the immixture of decorative patterns from architectural design1 which formed the art of illumination1 was a thing of alien character to the taste of the older school4 ,examples of course were produced both in ,rome itself and in ,provence of the new mode of illumination1 but they are to be ascribed to the barbarian element which was encroaching there as elsewhere1 and which finally triumphed4 ,byzantine ,work ,the traditions of classical art1 which had begun to grow weaker in ,byzantium even before the seventh century1 had faded away when the ,eastern ,emperor lost all hold upon ,italy4 ,not ,athens1 nor ,rome1 but ,memphis1 seemed to inspire the later stheticism of ,byzantine art2 and the ,greek emperors1 from the ninth century onwards1 appeared to be the successors rather of a line of ,ptolemies than of ,csars4 ,when we contrast the sculptures of ancient ,greece1 the designs upon ,grco-,roman coins1 and the pictures in ,pompeii1 with the work of ,byzantine illuminators1 we are inevitably reminded that the word ,greek is rarely appropriate in connexion with ,,mss4 ,there is very little of true ,greek in the artistic features of ,thraco-,grcian or gypto-,grcian work2 and it is not to real ,greeks or to real ,romans that we owe the handsome ,roman and the handsome ,hellenic type in which the texts of the ancient classics are now printed4 ,in the minuscule writing of ,greek1 which is usually #dhsupposed to have come into use about the end of the eighth century1 there never was the same calligraphical character as the uncials of an earlier time had exhibited1 nor the same desire to attain symmetrical beauty as was shown over and over again in the manuscripts of ,western ,europe4 ,the best writing of ,greek minuscules belongs to the ninth and tenth centuries of our era1 in which a sufficient amount of practice had been gained to ensure regularity of form4 ,a specimen of such writing1 executed towards the end of the tenth century1 probably in ,cyprus1 will be found in ,plate #f4 ,from the eleventh century to the sixteenth all minuscule writing in ,greek looks like a free cursive written without any calligraphical ambition1 and it became more and more ungraceful as time went on4 ,the value of ,greek ,,mss41 however1 depends more upon their contents than upon their beauty1 and frequently the roughest-looking piece of work may command an interest far greater than attaches to the splendid penmanship of the west4 ,the recently discovered ,gospel of ,peter is in a curious primitive minuscule hand1 which the editor of the facsimile1 ,oscar von ,gebhardt1 ascribes hesitatingly to the eighth or ninth century1 as had already been done by ,h4 ,omont4 ,it would not be surprising if other scholars were to assign it to the seventh century1 and thereby throw back the age of ,greek minuscule writing to a century or more behind the date usually fixed for it4 ,the mingling in that curious ,christian document of many uncial forms1 with a set of minuscular letters that betray a want of familiarity with set minuscules1 seems to prove that the book is older than the eighth century4 ,this observation is made1 not from any desire to be critical1 but simply in order to show that the question of age1 mentioned in the preceding paragraph1 is a thing which is still not finally settled4 #di,the ,tenth ,century ,the ,irish school of writing1 after its triumphs of the seventh1 eighth1 and ninth centuries1 lost much of its home-life in the midst of the struggles with the ,norsemen4 ,in ,england and on the continent its influence was still felt for some time longer2 even in the thirteenth century many of the ,psalters produced by ,english illuminators have the initial letter ,b decorated in the style adopted from the ,irish six centuries before4 ,irish ,,mss4 of any age are excessively rare2 even the comparatively worthless transcripts of the eighteenth century are in no inconsiderable request4 ,the ,english school continued to blend its ,irish style of writing with the illustrative pictures and borders which may have been entirely of native production in the eighth century1 as was seemingly the fact1 or may have originated from the artistic tendencies of ,frankish ,gaul1 as has already been surmised4 ,they were1 in any case1 influenced to some degree by examples of late ,roman work1 introduced by the ,italian missionaries who came to convert the ,saxons of ,south ,england after the ,angles of the north had been converted by the ,irish monks of ,iona4 ,it was really this ,english phase of decorative art which blossomed into ,anglo-,norman in the twelfth century4 ,the ,french schools were still ,carolingian and splendid1 but their pre-eminence was not maintained after the breaking up of the empire of ,charles the ,great4 ,the revolutions of the ninth century led to the making of nations4 ,france ceased to be the ,gallo-,roman province of a ,frankish monarchy4 ,a ,french language and a ,french nation emerged into existence in the tenth century1 but the grand ornamental and calligraphic work of the ,franco-,gallic time was no longer equalled4 ,the ,caroline writing1 which attained its greatest beauty about the middle of the #ejninth century1 gradually lost its elegant boldness1 tending towards angularity and crampness when the eleventh century had begun4 ,scandinavian ,writing ,the ,scandinavian countries have not yet been alluded to specifically4 ,the immense quantity of ,runic monuments found in ,denmark1 ,sweden1 and ,norway1 of all ages1 and in ,england1 of and after the ,norse period1 proves that ,runic writing was almost exclusively ,scandinavian4 ,there is now no question as to the actual origin of the ,runic alphabets4 ,they came into existence1 as already said1 by reason of the necessities of the amber-traffic between the coast of the ,baltic and the ,crimea long before the time of ,christ2 but what has survived belongs to the monuments of the ,north4 ,the real age of the extant runes does not probably exceed the fifth century4 ,that they were prized as national characteristics seems to be proved by their continued use among the ,northmen1 even after they had come into collision with a superior civilisation in the ,british isles4 ,christianity was not so easily adopted in ,scandinavia as in some other countries4 ,from the time of the first mission to its ultimate triumph at least two centuries elapsed1 and the result might have been still further delayed if it had not been for the example of two royal proselytes1 ,olaf ,trygvason and ,st4 ,olaf1 who belong to the first half of the eleventh century4 ,with the first introduction of ,christianity1 the ,norse people also received the script which they had found in use in ,england4 ,the colonisers of ,iceland1 in the ninth and tenth centuries1 carried with them the language and the writing of ,scandinavia2 and it was probably the remoteness of that island from ,norway which has caused the preservation in it1 down to the present #ea;day1 of the old ,norse tongue 7little modified by age7 and the ,anglo-,saxon letters of the tenth century4 ,in ,denmark1 ,sweden1 and ,norway1 the influence of ,north ,germany prevailed in time over old national tradition1 and the gothic hand of the thirteenth century took the place of the special alphabet4 ,by the time of the ,reformation the writing in ,scandinavia had been wholly ,teutonised 7with some exceptions too slight to need mention74 ,the most remarkable part of the change was the exclusion of the th letter from the script of ,sweden1 ,norway1 and ,denmark4 ,this tendency1 which had for centuries been in growth1 had the remarkable effect of practically confining the old ,norse literature to ,iceland1 and of making it the apparent home of all the poems and ,sagas which ,norway had produced4 ,it was at least the home of most of the literary men who in the twelfth1 thirteenth1 and fourteenth centuries wrote for the delight of their kinsmen1 in both ,norway and ,iceland4 ,the great literary activity in ,iceland1 at that time and afterwards1 produced a large quantity of ,,mss41 usually written on vellum1 and rudely decorated with painted initials2 but of those which remained in the country most have perished4 ,a relatively considerable number were1 however1 carried to ,denmark in the sixteenth and later centuries1 and have been preserved in museums4 ,very few yet remain in circulation1 unsecured by public appropriation4 ,the ,slavonic ,alphabet ,slavonic writing is said to have begun with ,st4 ,jerome4 ,to him is ascribed the invention of the ,glagolitic alphabet1 a set of symbols for ,illyrian use1 which seem to have no affinity to any of the familiar scripts4 ,it cannot have obtained much currency1 notwithstanding the ample sufficiency of its twenty-eight letters2 as otherwise the ,cyrillic alphabet 7derived from the ,greek1 with necessary #eb;additions7 would never have come into being4 ,in any case1 ,st4 ,cyril's alphabet1 devised in the ninth century for the use of the ,slovenes in ,moravia1 quite overpowered the ,glagolitic of ,dalmatia1 and while the ,croats and the ,dalmatians1 who came under the influence of the ,roman see1 retained their ,glagolitic only for liturgical use1 the ,slavs to the east fell into communion with the ,greek ,church1 and employed the ,cyrillic letters as their national type of writing4 ,it has lasted to the present time in its old form1 in biblical and liturgical books of which the texts are ancient1 but a plainer type1 more like the ,greek of to-day1 has been adopted for modern literature4 ,the ,poles and ,bohemians1 and the various ,slavs in ,germany1 have always followed the custom of ,germany in writing4 ,the ,russian alphabet is more complex than that of ,servia2 but it is only in modern time that the latter has been simplified4 ,the ,bulgarians1 since the establishment of their autonomy1 have given up the old ,slovene alphabet1 and adopted that of ,servia4 ,the ,labour of ,medival ,scribes from the ,ninth ,century onwards ,the literature which was to afford material for the exercise of the penmen's skill was restricted within ,christian boundaries4 ,it was rarely that a scribe condescended to make copies of any of the literary work produced in pagan ,rome or ,greece4 ,occasional instances are found which offer exception to the rule1 but as in the ninth century all the men who knew how to write were1 in one form or another1 servants of the ,church1 it was not to be expected that many among them would help to perpetuate the pernicious books of the dead heathens4 ,consequently many of the treasures of ancient literature perished4 ,the ,bible was the substitute2 and innumerable copies were made in the ,east and the ,west of the book which has influenced the world more powerfully #ecthan any other production of the wit of man4 ,in the ,east1 there was a more logical tendency to neglect the ,old ,testament and to copy only the ,new2 in the ,west1 it was the custom to multiply transcripts of the complete ,latin ,scripture as left by ,st4 ,jerome4 ,besides the ,bible1 there were the liturgical monuments4 ,the ,sacramentary which contained the order of sacrifice and adoration in the most solemn office of the ,church1 with all the prayers that preceded and followed the acts of offering and worship1 required careful and frequent copying1 so that it should not deviate in the smallest degree from the established model4 ,the slight changes which constituted differences of use in this part of the liturgy1 and which have distinguished the so-called ,gallican1 ,mozarabic1 ,milanese1 and ,celtic churches as at least co-val with 7and possibly older than7 the ,latin church of ,rome1 began to lose their historic distinctness in the ninth century and soon faded away4 ,the survival of belated and rare examples 7by the grace of papal sanction7 at ,toledo and at ,milan1 is but an antiquarian curiosity without any significance4 ,rome triumphed in the ninth century1 and the diversities in certain respects which have been dignified in ,england and elsewhere with the name of use since then1 are simply local varieties in unimportant particulars4 ,beyond the establishment of the supreme rite of sacrifice on certain holy days1 the ,church began1 at an early period of its existence1 to treat every day as consisting of so many hours of which some were necessarily to be yielded up to religious service4 ,the use of the ,psalms1 and of set prayers1 for that purpose1 and the fact that the anniversaries of saints' and martyrs' deaths had to be borne in remembrance1 led to the creation of the ,breviary4 ,besides this1 the office of the ,mass itself became requisite for celebration on every day as well as on the more solemn days1 and thus a variable portion 7according to the character of the day7 had to be added to the invariable4 ,thus enlarged1 the volume of the #ed,sacramentary1 with all its lessons from the ,bible1 and its accumulations of antiphonal phrases1 grew into the ,missal as we know it4 ,the ,breviary underwent similar increase1 and the result was to make the ,liturgy so extensive and so complex that it gave continual employment in the scriptorium of every church and monastery all over ,europe4 ,there were ,psalters1 ,sacramentaries1 ,missals1 ,breviaries1 ,lectionaries of several kinds1 ,hymnals1 ,graduals 7,books of the chanted antiphonal portions of the ,mass71 ,antiphonaries 7,books of the chanted antiphonal portions of the ,hours-offices71 ,martyrologies1 ,homilies1 and 7at a later time7 ,rituals1 ,processionals1 and ,pontificals 7offices to be performed by ,bishops74 ,st4 ,gregory had been the latest official arranger of the ,sacramentary or ,missal1 in the seventh century2 but its text was hardly settled till the twelfth century1 and the same may be said of the ,breviary4 ,in the ninth century1 however1 the texts had grown to something not very different from their ultimate state4 ,here was plenty of work for the priestly and monkish scribes4 ,besides the ,bible and the ,liturgy1 there were the works of the fathers1 and by-and-by the treatises of the schoolmen and the chronicles of monkish historians2 quite enough1 in all conscience1 to render useless the heavy lucubrations of ,livy and ,trogus ,pompeius1 and the absurd conceits of the heathen poets4 ,things were not dissimilar in ,byzantium4 ,the ,liturgy there was even more complex and extensive than in the ,west1 and the foolish literature of old ,hellas was generally ignored by the men who were engaged in daily study of the ,euchologium1 the ,horologium1 the ,menologium1 the ,archieraticon1 the ,synaxarium1 the ,octoechos1 c4 ,the ,bibliotheca of ,photius shows1 however1 that the race of students who cultivated the old literature was not wholly extinct4 ,at all times1 both in the ,east and the ,west1 the letters and charters of ,kings1 and diplomatic documents of every #eekind1 needed the service of trained penmen4 ,this department of graphic labour was not completely in the hands of churchmen2 and it led to the creation of a caste of writers in every country who were not under the influence of the monkish schools4 ,they could not afford to spend so much time as the book writers over their work1 and thus a hand of cursive character was established in every chancellery in ,europe1 devoted only to the service of the ,state and never employed for any other purpose4 ,it was nearly always ugly1 sometimes fantastic1 sometimes difficult to be read except by the officials engaged in such work4 ,from the earliest days of diplomatic writing1 in the sixth century in ,italy1 down to the seventeenth century in ,england1 it preserved a strange and fanciful style1 first long1 thin and narrow letters looking like a congeries of wandering parallel lines indistinguishable without a glass1 and finally letters of proper size1 but so disguised in shape as to be indecipherable without a special training4 ,at only one period1 that is1 in the late eleventh and in the twelfth century1 was diplomatic writing fair and readable4 ,that was in ,england and ,northern ,france2 but even here1 the upright strokes of letters like l1 and d1 and b1 were elongated to an enormous extent1 and in their sweep offered to the scribe his few opportunities of ornamentation4 ,as our business1 however1 is with books we leave the charters and the rescripts on one side1 and proceed to the consideration of the main character of the calligrapher's work4 ,the ,bible and the ,liturgy for churchmen have been spoken of as the chief objects of reproduction among the scribes for many centuries4 ,it was not till the twelfth century that their labours required to be augmented for the service of laymen4 ,men 7and women7 who could afford the expense1 or whose position demanded that they should have prayerbooks for their own use1 whether they could read ill or well or not at all1 were furnished with ,latin ,psalters1 to which were added1 at the end1 the ,athanasian #ef;,creed1 a ,litany of ,saints1 some general prayers1 and the office for the ,dead4 ,they were extracts from the ,breviary for the use of persons who only prayed occasionally4 ,the growth of something like education1 and a religious desire to share to a somewhat greater extent the communion with ,heaven which was monopolised by monks and priests1 caused a further extension of calligraphic labour towards the beginning of the fourteenth century4 ,the ,psalter with its scanty additions was no longer sufficient for pious laymen4 ,a larger selection of prayers and lessons from the ,breviary was concocted2 the offices of the ,virgin1 of the ,cross1 of the ,holy ,ghost1 and of some special saints were united to form the ,book of ,hours4 ,it was nothing like the severe and frequent task of orisons with which the monks performed their duties at the canonical ,hours of the day and night1 but it was sufficient for the most zealous laymen and laywomen2 and it became the private ,prayerbook of the fourteenth1 fifteenth1 and early sixteenth centuries4 ,during that period it was produced in countless thousands of manuscripts in ,england1 ,france1 ,flanders1 ,italy1 and to a less extent in ,germany and ,spain4 ,in ,england it was called ,hor ,beat ,mari ,virginis1 or ,book of ,hours1 or ,primer2 in ,france always ,hor1 or ,livre d',heures2 in ,italy it was ,officium ,b4,v4,m41 and in ,flanders and ,holland ,ghetijden4 ,the ,gebetbuch of ,germany belongs chiefly to the fifteenth century1 and was nearly always in ,german1 while in ,france1 ,flanders1 and ,england1 prayers in the vernacular only crept in gradually here and there4 7,in ,italy the book always continued to be written in ,latin only47 ,in the ,english ,hours or ,primer the vernacular portions became at last so important that it was found advisable to issue many of the printed ,primers in the sixteenth century in bilingual form1 ,latin and ,english2 and it was undoubtedly this tendency both in ,england and in ,germany which produced the ,reformation4 ,it was not so much the desire for a ,reformation of the ,church--even ,boccaccio1 himself a churchman1 #eg;and many others of his kind had wished for that--as an invincible demand for a vernacular liturgy1 which widened through opposition into an eagerness to sweep away everything that opposed it4 ,hence the break with ,rome1 which still imperiously demanded the uniformity that could only be maintained by the use of a single language throughout ,europe4 ,the few exceptions to the rule which ecclesiastical policy had ever allowed were in the concession to the affiliated ,greek1 ,slavonic1 and ,oriental congregations of a right to use their own vernacular liturgies4 ,the antiquity of the ,greek and ,syriac formulas1 on the one hand1 the utter impossibility of making ,latin familiar even to the priests of the ,slavic and ,oriental churches1 and the certainty that a denial of their needs would throw them into the ,byzantine fold--account for ,papal acquiescence in that respect4 ,but the ,popes could not see that ,england and ,germany1 which had from so early a time been the seats of ,roman colonies and the homes of ,latin churches1 likewise needed a liturgy that the people could understand2 and that the ,teutonic speech of the north had no such generic sympathy with the language of the ,roman liturgy as the rustic ,latin tongues of ,italy1 ,spain1 and ,france4 ,the ,canon ,law1 deriving from the remains of the apostolical constitutions and the acts of the ,councils1 the ,penitentiaries which had been formulated by bishops for the government of ,christianised barbarians1 and the decrees of ,popes1 began to take shape as a ,code in the eleventh and twelfth centuries4 ,the existence of forged documents among the decretals was a matter of no great importance4 ,everything was sufficiently old to be respectable2 and the schools of law1 which had never given up the study and cultivation of the ,civil ,code 7digested in ,justinian's time from the various works of the old ,roman jurists71 set to work to arrange and gloss the ,canon ,law4 ,the two ,codes1 especially the ,ecclesiastical1 provided the scribes of ,western ,europe with an enormous amount of work4 ,bologna1 #eh,padua1 ,paris1 and ,oxford were renowned for their lawyers and their schools of law2 with the accompanying armies of students and copyists4 ,christian poets1 too1 were not lacking4 ,from the time of ,lactantius onwards1 the quantity of metrical ,latin work done by churchmen was very large2 and the lyrical yearning inherent in all societies had produced an immense hymnology1 which comprised a great deal of real poetry--most poetical and most charming when least ,ciceronian4 ,here1 again1 was rich material for the copyists of the scriptorium2 and both ,hymnals and ,lawbooks lent their aid towards the gradual tendency of students to go back and investigate the ancient sources of literature and philosophy and history4 ,pliny had never been wholly forgotten1 even in the most anti-pagan times1 and the treatises on natural science which had appeared among the schoolmen1 all stimulated curiosity to learn what had been written before the days of ,constantine4 ,the result of these intellectual tendencies made the fourteenth century a dawn of the ,renaissance1 and with the beginning of the fifteenth a large body of heathen literature was annexed to the libraries of universities1 scholars1 and monasteries1 giving increased employment to the transcribers who were at that time busy all over ,europe4 ,it was in the thirteenth century that the monks and the priests lost their monopoly of the practice of ornamental writing2 in the fourteenth century every great city had its ateliers of calligraphers unconnected with the ,church2 and when the fifteenth century arrived the trained citizen penmen1 who formed crafts throughout ,europe1 were probably not inferior in number to the scribes who worked in ecclesiastical edifices4 ,the ,illuminated ,,mss4 of the ,middle ,ages ,this division of our matter is the largest1 and is also the most interesting to the majority of students and #ei;collectors4 ,in beginning it1 some repetition will be necessary in order to bring the subject as a whole before the reader4 ,between the ninth century and the sixteenth1 the multiplication of ,,mss4 in ,europe was very great1 but comparatively few of the ninth1 tenth1 and eleventh have been preserved4 ,beautiful examples of blended writing and decoration were produced in ,england in the ninth century by ,anglian and ,irish calligraphers in the north1 and by ,saxon writers in the south4 ,in ,york and ,durham1 and ,lindisfarne1 the style and the motifs of ornament were still thoroughly ,irish2 in the south1 although the late ,roman had conquered the ,celtic1 their collision had produced a singularly fine type of illumination1 reminiscent of ,byzantine work1 but much more free and natural4 ,that art had already beautified the ,carolingian ,french school2 in the ,carolingian ,german its influence appears in a weaker and ruder form4 ,when with the tenth century ,france and ,germany emerged as two distinct nations from the chaos of the ,frankish empire1 their modes of book-decoration began to diverge4 ,the rudeness of an earlier time remains1 with a good deal of spirit1 in the illustrative designs produced in ,germany2 the beauty of ,french work began to decay1 while the ,english was at its best4 ,winchester1 ,canterbury1 and ,glastonbury were the real centres of ,english art at the middle of the tenth century2 the ,norsemen having destroyed the ,anglo-,irish monasteries in the north4 ,this south ,english school is considered to have benefited materially by the technical superiority of ,french methods4 ,what the north ,english schools of ,york and ,lindisfarne had given to ,tours in the eighth century1 came back to ,winchester at the end of the ninth1 refined and embellished4 ,thus the supremacy of ,english art was assured at a time when ,french art was declining4 ,the great variety1 however1 in all countries1 of work done by different men1 renders it difficult to draw general deductions4 ,the calligraphic decoration of ,visigothic and ,lombardic manuscripts during the ninth1 #fjtenth1 and eleventh centuries is visibly ,celtic in origin and style4 ,their pictorial illustration is sometimes very striking1 and indicates the existence of several central schools of design in ,europe4 ,the ,english1 the ,french1 the ,german1 the ,spanish1 and the ,italian1 had all certain qualities in common1 but the first two were most nearly akin4 ,the other three schools produced in the eleventh and twelfth centuries books containing pictures1 in which the composition is more remarkable than the drawing1 and the painting is full of barbaric contrasts of colour4 ,at all times1 fine work was to be found in ,italy1 but only in isolated examples1 and ,italy as a whole underwent the same barbarisation as the other countries4 ,from that stage the ,english and the ,french were the first to emerge4 ,they can hardly be said to have revived any former state of art in connexion with books4 ,it was with them a real creation4 ,the frequent reference to ,byzantium as having supplied the models for ,european illuminated work is misleading4 ,the first sign of actual contact with ,byzantium is in the early part of the ninth century1 when certain pictures produced in ,carolingian ,,mss4 show that the painters had been made aware of the existence of similar ,byzantine work4 ,and that is actually all that can be referred to as direct imitation of ,byzantine art4 ,the magnificent early examples of chrysography on purple vellum were not ,byzantine but ,eastern-,roman1 and the ,roman traditions of the ,eastern capital lingered on into the ninth century1 having begun to grow weaker at the end of the sixth4 ,italy was nearer and more potent in its influence upon barbaric art than ,byzantium1 and there was little difference in book-decoration between ,east ,rome and ,west ,rome till after the time of ,justinian2 so far as the cultivation of the arts was concerned4 ,consequently there is no need to look to ,byzantium as having supplied models for the rest of ,europe to follow4 ,there is a difference of kind1 not merely of degree1 between the livres de luxe of the two ,roman empires1 and those of the new nations which began #fawith ,irish work about ,a4,d4 #fjj1 and ended with ,italian and ,french work about #aeej4 ,the former were books written in gold1 perhaps2 perhaps decorated with red ink only2 illustrated1 maybe1 with a picture or with pictures4 ,the latter were books of which the principal characteristic was not their bookishness but their decorativeness4 ,a set scheme of ornament sustained from beginning to end1 with due proportion in the intervals1 in which even the pictorial designs were subordinate to the decorative plan1 constituted the value of the illuminated books of the ,european middle ages4 ,bibles and liturgical books in the twelfth century are remarkable for their large size and the quantity of decoration with which they were produced4 ,in ,germany1 the method of ornament still repeats the ,anglo-,saxon type derived from ,carolingian work1 and the handwriting is still ,carolingian1 but the letters lean forward instead of being upright1 their forms are narrowed and chiselled off by short sharp terminal strokes that give an appearance of angularity4 7,an example of the art is given on plate #ba47 ,in ,spain1 the beautiful round ,visigothic letters are still retained1 with large initials of interlaced ,celtic pattern1 and the illustrative pictures 7if there are any7 have the same style as had been developed some centuries earlier in ,aquitaine4 ,the ,german and the ,spanish have a sort of resemblance by reason of their common origin1 but more especially because of the striking combination of green and yellow in the paintings1 the note of yellow apparently being strongest in the latter1 and of green in the former4 ,the use of green tints predominates likewise in ,english work of the eighth-twelfth centuries1 but became much more sparing under the influence of the ,french school which1 after the eleventh century1 began to avoid indulgence in that colour4 ,it never lost its favourite place in ,german art1 and the ,,mss4 of ,holland and ,flanders only dropped it when they began to assimilate ,french methods in the fourteenth century4 ,england in the twelfth century #fbproduced much finer work than the ,french4 ,in fact the ,english school of that century was the parent of nearly all the art of the following century4 ,both in calligraphy and in pictorial designs1 it forestalled the work done in the whole of ,western ,europe between #abjj and #acjj1 which has rendered the thirteenth century the most noteworthy in the history of illustrated ,,mss4 ,the mode and style of drawing1 unfinished by illumination1 which were practised in ,england towards the close of the thirteenth century1 may be examined in plate #aj4 ,italian work of the same time is shown in plate #aa to have been much more barbaric and unskilful4 ,the difference between ,english twelfth-century work and that of ,europe in the thirteenth century consisted in the large and ample freedom of hand which marks the former and the delicate minuteness which characterises alike the writing and the miniatures of the latter4 ,as for style and quality of work1 there is scarcely any difference between them4 ,this new ,english school1 so admirable in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries1 had grown up over the decline of the ,anglo-,saxon phase1 which1 fine as it was1 had still somewhat of a barbaric air about it4 ,the conquest of the ,saxon monarchy by a ,duke of ,normandy in the eleventh century1 and the succession in the twelfth of a ,count of ,anjou who united under his sceptre ,england1 ,normandy1 and ,aquitaine1 made this country the centre of ,french art and literature for a considerable period4 ,hence the almost complete identity of the modes of writing and ornamentation between ,english and ,french work in the thirteenth century4 ,in ,central and ,south-eastern ,france the style varied somewhat as will be seen by comparing the examples given on plates #h and #i4 ,there is no school of art more interesting than the ,anglo-,norman1 as it is called1 of that time4 ,the illuminated border had not yet established itself1 but the initials1 drawn upon a ground of burnished gold or of diapered tints1 enclose painted miniatures looking like very fine pen-and-ink designs carefully coloured4 ,bibles thus decorated are very #fcnumerous4 ,as they approach the end of the century1 they exhibit now and then long straight lines1 ending in curves or fleurons1 which spread from the pictured initial upwards and downwards1 and form a simple border to more than half the page4 ,this incipient practice increased gradually from the beginning of the following century onwards4 ,the fleurons became gold ivy-leaves1 and similar leaves were figured as sprouting out from the long straight border-lines1 these lines being extended so as to enclose the page on all sides4 ,still the effect was stiff and imperfect1 but by the close of the fourteenth century1 a very splendid kind of foliated border was used by ,french illuminators4 ,the gold leaves called ivy-leaves were now introduced in greater number and made to sprout1 no longer from the straight border frame itself1 but more naturally out of branches which festooned from the frame4 ,the ivy-leaf border in this state was very much favoured in ,french illumination1 but was little used elsewhere4 ,it generally accompanies pictorial illustration of superior merit1 and gives an air of distinction and elegance to any ,,ms4 in which it is found4 ,the ,french schools of ,central ,france and of ,paris had by the middle of the fourteenth century regained their lost pre-eminence in art4 ,the thirteenth century was the first and the finest period of medival gothic1 so far as handwriting is concerned4 7,the name is a misnomer1 but has a clear recognised sense1 and is useful47 ,the letters are angulated at their extremities1 but the bodies are still rounded and perfectly clear4 ,the square and lapidar ,gothic was introduced in the fourteenth century1 and prevailed during that and the two succeeding centuries4 ,it was a vicious script1 indistinct and difficult to read2 and although some examples1 distinct1 legible1 and handsome1 were brought out in the fifteenth century1 the system was generally bad1 and there is no reason to regret its extinction1 which took place in ,france1 ,italy1 and ,spain about the middle of the sixteenth #fd;century1 and in ,england somewhat later1 although it is lingering on even now in ,germany and ,denmark4 ,the square ,gothic of the fourteenth century1 however unclear and objectionable as a script1 was not ill adapted to ornamental purposes1 as the vast number of prayerbooks for the laity produced between #acej and #adjj1 and throughout the succeeding century1 make manifest4 ,of those prayerbooks1 which for a hundred and fifty years were the chief medium for displaying the skill of the medival illuminator1 the number of copies which were made for individuals or families1 as birth-day or wedding gifts1 or for whatever reason1 was incredibly large4 ,the existence of such prayerbooks1 well written and decorated with paintings1 for private persons1 is enough in itself to show that the office of calligrapher and miniaturist was a secular trade1 and that the old monks1 to whom so many persons ascribe the writing of the missals1 had long ceased to be the sole producers of ,,mss4 ,not many of the earlier ,books of ,hours have survived1 that is1 of those which were written between #acjj and #acej2 but from the latter date onwards to #adjj they are not uncommon1 and from #adjj onwards very numerous4 ,this statement refers to ,french and ,franco-,flemish and ,burgundian work4 ,of ,english work1 there are very few extant anterior to #adjj1 and the same may be said of ,dutch examples4 ,as for those written in ,italy and ,germany1 it is only towards the close of the fifteenth century that they are met with4 ,the ,english and ,french ,hours produced during #acej-adbj are very different in their mode of ornamentation4 ,the ,gothic writing was pretty nearly the same everywhere1 and the larger illuminated initials had followed one model since the thirteenth century4 ,these initials 7when not historiated with little miniatures7 were painted in colour upon a ground usually of gold4 ,the space within the letter-forms was filled up with a conventional flower-pattern1 having buds of red and blue tints4 ,at the earlier #feperiod the letter-form has a small extension upwards and downwards1 in a simple style resembling wood-carving4 ,in the fourteenth century this extension is increased1 and the long straight border1 with ivy-leaves here and there1 was produced4 ,while that kind of border was in ,france being developed into its most elegant phase1 a different type was preferred in ,england4 ,the gold ground of the initial is prolonged into a stem1 around which twines a corresponding prolongation of coloured foliage springing from the curved extremities of the initial letter4 ,thus they form a border which would be pretty enough in itself1 but which is further decorated with tufts of long feathery grass1 tipped with buds1 which grow out of the stem and sweep in graceful curves outside the line of foliage4 ,this feathery ornament--which1 except for the little fleurons in colour here and there1 seems drawn with a fine pen in brown ink--is distinctly ,english1 and was retained till late in the fifteenth century1 side by side with newer methods borrowed from ,france4 ,the red and blue1 with white lights1 which are used in the initials and capitals by the ,french illuminators1 are in the ,english ,,mss4 pink and pale blue1 and the white lights are broader4 ,as soon as the ivy-leaf pattern1 with its brilliant gold points1 began to go out of fashion in ,france1 a new kind of border came into vogue4 ,the conventional red and blue foliage still continued to spring out from the initials and at intervals below and above2 all the intervening space was filled in with curling and twining tendrils1 drawn with a pen or a very fine brush1 forming a kind of hedge1 in the midst of which were scattered here and there little natural flowers and fruits1 growing out of the curled tendrils4 ,this was in use in ,french and ,burgundian and ,flemish ,,mss4 from about #adbj-cj onwards1 and became a favourite method of decoration in ,england towards the middle of the century4 ,at that time1 and in that style1 prayerbooks done in the three countries are often much alike1 and it is #ffonly the painting of the miniatures and the differences in the calendar and litany which distinguish them4 ,the chief ,liturgical ,books distinguished ,a word may be said here as to the means of distinguishing the liturgical ,,mss41 and obtaining an idea of their place of origin4 ,it ought not to be necessary1 but1 as a matter of fact1 there are many persons of fair education1 and possessing no inconsiderable familiarity with manuscripts1 who call every ,book of ,hours a ,missal1 and who cannot distinguish between a ,breviary and a ,missal4 ,the ,missal gives the service of the ,mass for the whole year4 ,its essence lies in the ,canon of the ,mass1 beginning with the words ,te igitur1 which is preceded by a number of prfationes 7some of them general1 some of them appropriated to special occasions71 and followed by the ,communion and the concluding thanksgivings4 ,this was in more ancient times the first and the larger part of the ,mass-book1 and was followed by a set of prayers1 which in the service itself preceded and led to the ,preface1 these preliminary prayers being arranged under the festivals of the year from ,december to ,december4 ,in the ,missal1 as arranged and enlarged in the thirteenth century1 there are four divisions3 #a4 ,de ,tempore 7,sundays and festivals72 #b4 ,prefaces1 ,canon1 and ,ordinary of the ,mass2 #c4 ,mass-prayers appropriated to special ,saints' days2 #d4 ,mass-prayers common to all ,saints' days4 ,the chronological order from ,advent to ,advent 7#cjth ,november to #bith ,november7 was followed1 except in the case of some of the most solemn and ancient commemorations1 and also of some special festivals that had been appointed after the original compilement of the ,mass-book4 ,these were incorporated in the part ,de ,tempore1 in succession to the text relating to the ,advent4 ,at the end of the fourth part were also added some of the special offices in regard to the laity1 which had to be #fgperformed by the priest1 such as matrimony1 baptism1 and burial4 ,the essence of the ,breviary was the ,psalter1 which formed the groundwork of all the forms of devotion used at the ,canonical ,hours4 ,with the appointed extracts from the ,psalter a number of prayers were used1 and these were divided in exactly the same way as those of the ,missal into ,temporal 7of ,sundays and festivals7 in one sequence2 and ,sanctoral1 in two sections1 ,proper and ,common4 ,the perpetually recurring rubrics of ,matins1 ,lauds1 ,prime1 ,tierce1 ,sext1 ,none1 and ,vespers 7ad matutinas1 in laudibus1 ad primam1 ad tertiam1 ad sextam1 ad nonam1 ad vesperas7 mark the hours of their use from midnight to midnight4 ,these headings1 repeated from day to day all over the year1 ought to be sufficient even to the least observant eye to indicate the ,breviary4 ,it also contains at the end the offices of ,marriage1 ,baptism1 ,burial1 c42 and in some of the ,breviaries the office of the ,mass itself 7not the whole ,missal7 is included4 ,the ,book of ,hours 7or ,private ,prayerbook7 is a selection from the ,breviary1 and is likewise marked with the rubrics of the hours 7,matins1 ,lauds1 ,nones1 c471 but they are applied only to the offices selected1 and do not contain the chronological divisions1 ,temporal and ,sanctoral1 for the year4 ,the offices are usually those of the ,virgin1 of the ,cross1 of the ,holy ,ghost1 of the ,trinity1 and these1 with the ,office for the ,dead1 and commemorations of some special ,saints1 form the chief bulk of the ,hor4 ,the ,calendar1 which is found at the beginning1 and the ,litany 7or ,litanies7 of ,saints1 which is found in the body1 of each of the three books1 are usually the most obvious sources of information with regard to the origin of the manuscript4 ,if the use1 or diocesan form of the liturgy1 is purely ,roman1 as is sometimes the case even in books written in ,france1 ,flanders1 and ,england1 then the search is frustrated4 ,it happens1 however1 frequently that even #fhthe ,roman ,calendar and the ,roman ,litany are enlarged by the addition of names to which a special local veneration was paid1 and then one is able to discover hints of origin which may indicate either a country or a diocese4 ,in the ,french books1 the number of ,french ,saints is usually considerable1 that is of ,french ,saints who do not appear in the ,roman calendar1 but they are generally gathered impartially from all the dioceses4 ,it is only when we find that a single diocese furnishes the names of two or three canonised bishops1 or when a name appears in gold in the calendar which had no special importance for the whole of the country1 but must have had a particular interest in one city or diocese1 that we can begin to think of special attributions4 ,thus1 if ,st4 ,ives 7,yvo71 ,ste4 ,genevieve1 ,st4 ,germain1 ,st4 ,leufroy1 ,st4 ,louis1 ,s4 ,faro1 ,st4 ,ursin1 ,st4 ,saintin1 ,st4 ,saturnin1 ,ste4 ,radegonde1 ,st4 ,fiacre1 ,st4 ,austrebert1 and many others1 are found in the ,calendar1 and any of them in the ,litany1 it is a sure proof of ,french origin4 ,if ,st4 ,saturnin appears in gold in the ,calendar1 it serves to indicate ,toulouse2 if ,st4 ,sainctin1 ,meaux2 ,martial1 ,limoges2 ,firmin1 ,metz or ,amiens2 and if ,,ss4 ,ursin1 ,guillaume1 and ,austregisile occur together in the ,litany1 they point out ,bourges--all three having been ,archbishops of that see4 ,but in all cases collateral or cumulative testimony is required4 ,saints ,vedastus and ,amandus 7,vaast and ,amand71 although belonging to ,flanders1 may occur either in ,french or ,flemish ,calendars2 but when they are combined with ,bavo and ,bertin1 and ,quintin and ,aldegund1 they indicate ,ghent or its vicinity as the place of origin4 ,st4 ,piat1 ,st4 ,lehyre 7or ,eleutherius71 and ,st4 ,guillain point to ,tournay4 ,st4 ,valery or ,walery 7,walaricus7 is another ,flemish ,saint1 as also are ,audomar1 ,gaugericus1 ,godeleve1 ,winnoc1 and ,amelberga4 ,as for ,,mss4 of ,flemish origin1 it must be remembered that the word ,flemish is loosely used to designate all portions of the ,low ,countries except the #fipurely ,dutch provinces1 and that ,artois and ,picardy and other portions of the ,french ,pays ,reconquis of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries were part of them4 ,in the same way ,franche ,comt and the ,duchies of ,burgundy and ,lorraine were also outside of ,france in the fifteenth century2 and ,languedoc and ,provence and ,dauphin were late additions to the ,french monarchy4 ,the words ,flemish 7in its fullest sense7 and ,french have therefore to be used with caution4 ,even ,brittany was only incorporated at the end of the fifteenth century4 ,manuscript liturgies of ,english origin of any date are unmistakable by reason of the saints' names4 ,st4 ,thomas a ,becket is not one of the distinctive ones1 for he was worshipped everywhere2 but all the ,english books1 whether they be of ,roman use1 or of ,salisbury or ,york use1 contain the names of ,,ss4 ,alban1 ,cuthbert1 ,aldhelm1 ,guthlac1 ,botulph1 ,grimbald1 ,edward1 ,richard1 ,edmund1 ,swithin1 ,dunstan1 ,etheldreda1 ,edith1 ,winifrid1 ,chad1 ,john of ,beverley4 ,the names of ,st4 ,wilfrid1 ,st4 ,william1 ,st4 ,hilda1 ,st4 ,aidan1 ,st4 ,bede1 and ,st4 ,everilda1 are proofs of ,york and northern use2 ,st4 ,milburga1 ,st4 ,guthlac1 and ,st4 ,thomas ,cantilupe indicated ,hereford1 as also does ,st4 ,osytha1 although one name alone is not sufficient4 ,st4 ,wulfstan points to ,worcester1 ,st4 ,hugh to ,lincoln1 but not always4 ,aldatus1 ,kinburga1 ,egwin1 and ,elwin1 are only found in books of ,gloucester or western origin4 ,st4 ,erkenwald always indicates ,london or the south4 ,scottish liturgies of the kind are very rare1 and contain the names of saints not elsewhere met with4 ,there can be no doubt as to the origin beyond the border of a book which either in its calendar or its ,litany gives the names of ,kentigern1 ,ninian1 ,aidan1 ,adamnan1 ,monan1 ,queen ,margaret1 ,duthac1 and ,modoc4 ,even any one of these names is sufficient1 although ,adamnan1 ,aidan1 and ,ninian might possibly appear on this side of the ,tweed1 as well as ,st4 ,adrian who was likewise ,scottish4 #gj,special ,german saints are ,gotthard1 ,lambert 7not always71 ,adelbert1 ,bernward1 ,sebald1 ,swibert1 ,cunegund1 ,hermenegild1 ,willibald1 ,kilian1 ,hedwig1 ,wolfgang1 ,irmin4 ,among the saints of the ,spanish calendar are ,isidore1 ,ildefonsus1 ,eulalia1 ,raimund1 ,leocadia1 ,gumersind1 ,baldomer1 ,leander1 ,braulio1 ,turibius1 ,quiteria1 ,froilan4 ,there is sometimes a curious coincidence between the ,spanish and the ,german calendars4 ,the ,spanish coincidences with the calendar of ,southern ,france are more easily to be accounted for4 ,the ,italian saints are always those of the ,roman calendar1 but ,st4 ,zenobio is seldom found outside of ,tuscany4 ,,ss4 ,bernardinus of ,siena and ,nicolas of ,tolentinum are ,italian saints of the fifteenth century more frequently found in ,italian calendars 7after #adej7 than in calendars of other countries4 ,in the case of the latter two1 their names are sometimes useful in fixing a limit for the age of a book1 because ,,mss4 of the time of their canonisation are numerous4 ,the dates of beatification of some earlier saints such as ,thomas ,becket1 ,francis1 ,dominic1 and ,king ,louis1 are also occasionally of service2 but as a rule the names of the saints in the calendars are far older than the thirteenth century4 ,the ,fourteenth ,century in ,italy and ,germany ,to go back to the fourteenth century4 ,in ,italy the broken ,lombard had given way to the general adoption of the modern gothic4 ,some excellent decorative work began to appear in the borders and miniatures of ,,mss4 executed in ,northern and ,central ,italy4 ,as a rule in the earlier times1 ,italian miniatures were rude in drawing1 and barbaric in colour like ,german and ,spanish work2 but in the thirteenth century a distinct ,italian type arose1 based at first on imitation of the semi-,byzantine art of ,calabria and ,sicily2 but soon growing more national under the influence of ,giotto4 ,there is no resemblance in style or manner between the miniatures and borders of ,italian artists1 and #gathose of ,northern ,europe4 ,the figures and faces are painted with opaque colour1 and a broad brush2 giving altogether a stronger impression of representing real men and women1 than the exquisite drawing of the ,french artists1 in which faces were washed with colour after having had the features drawn in with a pen or a fine brush4 7,plate #ab shows the style of illustration used at ,venice in the first half of the fourteenth century1 in which there is a curious combination of ,french-like calligraphy with the painty miniatures of the home school of art47 ,there was in fact more of modelling in the ,italian illuminator's work in its purely national stage from about #acej to #adej4 ,after the later date a more subtle and minute delicacy in the drawing altered the character of the pictorial work4 ,the borders which prevailed during #acbj to #adbj are also quite different from ,french work4 ,broad foliage of architectonic pattern hangs in soft tints of red and blue from a long upright slender pole like an ornamental curtain-rod1 and little buds or drops of burnished gold fall here and there within the line of sight1 but there is no attempt to fill up the spaces with any elaborate scheme of twining branches and real leaves and flowers1 as in the ,french parallels4 ,the writing is usually square and gothic1 but with few of the oblique angles and little projecting points that are seen in ,western gothic4 ,the ,lombardic hand of ,eastern and ,southern ,italy1 had left no trace in the script which succeeded it4 ,the round and beautiful ,carolingian letter of ,north ,italy had a distinct influence in moulding the ,italian gothic1 and preserving its freedom from ,teutonic angularities4 ,it had lasted longer here than in other countries1 but ,spanish ,visigothic was also a late lingerer1 and did not succumb to ,french influence till the thirteenth century4 ,in ,germany1 the fourteenth century proceeded as elsewhere to produce a closely packed difficult ,gothic letter1 and also to introduce an ugly cursive which came generally into use in the next century4 ,in decoration1 the old #gb;,germanic style had given way to the influence of ,french and ,italian work1 and a sort of new school was created1 which in the following century became distinctively ,german4 ,the cursive writing alluded to was an ugly rapid script deformed from the minuscule1 which was very largely used in the fifteenth century1 and developed in time the handwriting which still prevails in ,germany1 although gradually giving way to the ,roman4 ,english ,work in the ,fourteenth ,century ,the cursive hand in ,england1 as used between #abej and #aeej for all purposes1 and in legal documents for a long time afterwards1 seems to have grown up in the early part of the thirteenth century4 ,it is quite unlike the earlier charter hand1 although it must have been derived from it4 ,for the first century or more of its use1 it is remarkable by reason of the long strokes which are broad and heavy above1 but taper into thin lines below1 those heavy heads being bifurcated in the earlier times and looped in the later4 ,during the thirteenth and a great part of the fourteenth century it looked handsome1 and could be read without difficulty2 from the late part of the fourteenth century onwards it deteriorated both in aspect and in clearness4 ,nothing resembling this ,english hand was used on the continent1 except 7in a slight degree7 in the notes written sometimes on the margins of philosophical and legal books1 by means of a hard leaden stylus4 ,another cursive was also employed1 which was merely the rapid writing of the gothic minuscule1 like that of ,germany2 but this appeared rather on the continent4 ,it has been remarked that the ,norman conquest introduced a new fashion in writing2 but the observation is too strong4 ,that event led gradually to the disuse of writing in the angular ,anglo-,saxon letters1 but had little influence on the fashion of the script used for writing ,latin1 which had become round and clear since the tenth century4 ,the #gc;,carolingian reformation had failed to supersede the ,anglo-,irish hand1 but its influence extended far enough to improve the shape even of the purely ,english letters4 ,in ,ireland1 the angular character had fixed its type which has not since varied4 ,at the beginning of the fourteenth century1 the ,english1 as has been said above1 began to relinquish the lead in calligraphy and ornamentation1 which they had held since the twelfth4 ,the ,latin ,bibles which had been produced towards the end of the twelfth century were usually folios of good size1 written in a large and fine hand1 and decorated with miniatures of the type seen in the ,huntingfield ,psalter4 ,the fashion of the thirteenth century inclined to work of smaller dimensions1 and the ,bibles came out in small octavo or duodecimo size until the end of the century approached1 when there was a tendency to revert to small folios4 ,in the fourteenth century1 a favourite size was quarto or small quarto4 ,the illustrations in ,,mss4 of both twelfth and thirteenth centuries1 and of the beginning of the fourteenth1 were similar in style1 but varying in appearance according to the space allowed the artist4 ,french ,work in the ,fourteenth ,century ,the ,french took the lead in the fourteenth century1 especially during the second half4 ,there was not much to choose in the writing of the time in any country1 but it was best in ,italy4 ,it was in the dainty adornment of their illuminated ,,mss41 and in the fine and delicate beauty of the pictorial designs1 that the ,french school now assumed its place of pre-eminence4 ,the ,apocalypse was a favourite book in the first half of this century1 as it had been in the twelfth1 and artists delighted in drawing pictures of its strange visions4 ,these pictures were seldom quite original in design1 since the earliest delineations had acquired a sort of traditional authority1 but they were sufficiently variant in #gdparticulars to exhibit the strength of the artist4 ,diapered and chequered patterns came more prominently into fashion along with the older use of burnished gold1 for backgrounds2 and a great deal of excellent work was done4 ,an example from a ,french ,apocalypse is given on plate #ac4 ,in most cases1 the picture was drawn with a fine brush and the colours delicately washed in afterwards4 ,french artists attained to singular perfection in this dainty method of illustration1 and nothing of the kind excels some of the superior specimens4 ,amongst them will be found a number of charming ,books of ,hours executed at ,bourges1 ,tours1 and ,paris1 for ,charles ,v of ,france and his brothers4 ,whatever may be thought of the beautiful paintings in ,flemish and ,italian ,,mss4 at the end of the fifteenth century1 it is undeniable that the last thirty years of the fourteenth produced ,french work which will hold its own against the illumination of any period or of any country4 ,it is curious as showing how little the warfare against ,edward ,,iii had affected the progress of art in ,france4 ,the ,fifteenth ,century ,the second half of the fourteenth century saw a dynasty of ,french princes established in the ,duchy of ,burgundy1 and the union of the states which had belonged to the ,counts of ,flanders1 to the ,duke's dominions4 ,these political circumstances had the effect of diverting some of the best ,french miniaturists to the court of ,philippe le ,hardi1 and of founding a grand ,burgundian school of art1 which led to the creation of the ,flemish one4 ,the ,burgundian ,,mss4 of the first half of the fifteenth century were usually executed at ,dijon 7the capital of the ,duchy7 or ,besancon2 and were thus simply works of ,french art1 not very different in style from those produced at ,bourges1 ,nevers1 and ,auxerre2 but a certain local type was developed in the ornamental borders of the miniatures2 and as soon as the political centre of gravity #gewas shifted northwards1 by reason of the greater wealth and importance of the ,low ,countries1 ,bruges and ,brussels became the chief towns in ,philip the ,good's dominions1 and a new element was introduced into ,burgundian art4 ,the ,flemish artists of ,bruges1 ,lille1 and ,liege had been renowned since the middle of the fourteenth century for their skill in miniature painting1 and ,van ,eyck himself was a dependent of ,philippe le ,bon1 in whose service he spent the last nine years of his life at ,bruges 7#adcb-addj74 ,it is supposed that the earlier ,flemish artists were the creators of grisaille painting1 although that beautiful mode of pictorial illustration is first found in ,french books of the middle of the fourteenth century4 7,a specimen is given on plate #ad47 ,the finest examples of grisaille were produced by ,flemish artists at ,bruges between #addj and #adgj1 and a book of ,hours1 illuminated for ,jaquot de ,brgilles in #addc1 in the possession of the writer1 is one of remarkable beauty4 ,another fine specimen1 of somewhat later date1 is the ,miroir ,historial1 a miniature from which is reproduced on plate #ag4 ,side by side with this kind of chaste work1 splendid illumination of the rich ,french style was practised in ,flanders1 and a favourable example is given of a ,book of ,hours painted at ,tournay about #adfj1 on plate #af4 ,grisaille painting originated evidently from the suggestions of carved stone-work in cathedral-decoration4 ,the figures of saints occupying niches1 which were familiar to the visitants of churches1 were the first models that led to the painting of miniatures with the figures in grey tints4 ,it must have been1 for a true artist1 delightful to triumph over the difficulty of achieving the effects of relief and of modelling with the aid of a single pigment only4 ,to be the master of such an art1 and to handle the monochrome in such a way as to run with perfect touch through a gamut of gradations in tone1 would surely have been more gratifying than to win success by the splendour of full illumination4 ,the artist did not1 however1 entirely abstain #gf;from the use of gold2 he allowed it to shine on the crowns of kings and around the heads of his saints2 and colour was used sparingly in the backgrounds4 ,these backgrounds in the pictures of earlier date were ornamental diapered surfaces1 but after the first decade or two of the fifteenth century1 landscape backgrounds made their appearance4 ,it was1 however1 some time before the miniaturist succeeded in realising effects of distance1 and thus producing true pictures as distinguished from ornamental historiation4 ,the ,italians were the first to gain a tolerable knowledge of perspective1 but the ,flemings were not much behind them4 ,it was not1 however1 till late in the fifteenth century that anything like a faithful expression of perspective is found in the miniatures of ,,mss4 ,in the latter part of the fifteenth century1 pure grisaille was extended into camaieu2 that is1 the monochrome might be any other colour than grey1 so long as it was used in the same manner4 ,this1 however1 was usually confined to parts of miniatures1 and not inconsistent with a lavish use of gold for the lights1 and masses of different colour in other portions of the same picture4 ,the quantity of gold that gave magnificence to the work of the miniaturist in ,flanders and ,france in the last quarter of the fifteenth century became excessive4 ,it was a relief to the eye when this blaze of gold receded before the outcome of late ,flemish art4 ,scarcely any school produced work comparable for delicacy and truth to the miniatures painted in prayerbooks at ,bruges and ,ghent between #adij and #aebj4 ,illuminated ,borders in the ,fifteenth ,century ,after the year #adjj1 as has been already said1 the private ,prayerbooks1 or ,books of ,hours1 which at that time were used in ,france and ,england1 but not to any great extent elsewhere1 began to increase in numbers and develop new styles of ornament4 ,the pages with illuminated #gg;initials still preserved the older border1 the basis of which was a double line of gold and colour issuing from the initial and running squarely round the page4 ,at the corners and at intervals gold branches1 bearing gold and coloured ivy-leaves1 went forth in somewhat stiff curves to form the outer decoration of the border4 ,this was in ,french ,,mss4 ,in the ,english ones1 heavy masses of gold and colour representing conventional foliage appeared at the corners1 and out of the border-lines emerged the long sweeping tufts of feathery grass with red and blue buds1 which have been already alluded to4 ,towards #adcj the ivy-leaves lost their prominence in ,france1 and were only preserved in portion of the ornament4 ,the straight framing lines were abandoned both in ,england and ,france1 and a broader border was obtained by a methodical arrangement of hundreds of curling hair-lines1 black or brown1 out of which sprung little red and blue flowers of natural appearance4 ,this pattern was drawn and massed so as to represent a broad frame1 even and square1 enclosing the page4 ,this became a customary mode of ornamentation in both countries1 so that a large proportion of ,english and ,french work was much alike in style1 though not always in execution4 ,when the middle of the century arrived1 a modification began to take place in ,french ,,mss42 the fine black hair-lines of the borders gave place to wreathing green branches1 less numerous1 and thus more proportionate in quantity4 ,the flowers and leaves springing from them became more numerous1 more natural and less conventional4 ,by this time ,burgundian and ,flemish ,livres d',heures were also produced in large numbers1 and brilliant pictures of blossoms growing in the rich gardens of ,burgundy added the weight of their influence to the tendency towards floral decoration4 ,the flowers in the borders grew more realistic and varied1 and were sometimes fine large examples of their species4 ,this method was followed in ,england as well as in ,france4 ,next appeared #gh;in continental work backgrounds1 either of gold or of colour1 to the borders2 which had previously been painted on the plain vellum4 ,finally1 in ,france it became fashionable to break the border into spaces 7taking various shapes71 of which some had gold grounds and some were without grounds2 or to treat the border in such a fashion that the branches and flowers should appear partly on gold1 partly on russet1 partly on blue1 or in other combinations4 ,this bizarre fashion did not take the taste either of ,english or of ,flemish artists4 ,the ,english retained their crowded border of flowers and branches painted on the plain vellum1 while the ,flemings began to paint rich natural cut flowers upon a monochromatic ground of pale gold or yellow4 ,on this pale ground1 free from all the convolution of twining branches seen in ,french and ,english work1 they were enabled to throw shadows beneath the cut flowers1 so that these appeared to stand out in strong relief1 with excellent effect4 ,the new fashion at once found copyists everywhere2 the celebrated ,hours of ,anne of ,brittany is one of the finer ,french examples4 ,the imitations done in ,england were not very successful4 ,end of the ,fifteenth ,century ,we now reach the last decade of the fifteenth century2 in which the late ,flemish school already alluded to arose in ,bruges and ,ghent4 ,in combination with those beautiful borders of fresh cut flowers painted in apparent relief upon pale gold or yellow1 the delicate art of ,memling and ,gerard ,david produced small and exquisite miniatures with architectural and landscape accessories2 the like of which had not yet been seen in the illustration of books1 unless we find a parallel in the lovely and no less exquisite pictures in ,florentine manuscripts of the same period4 ,the radical difference between the work of the north and that of the #gisouth--notwithstanding that each of them betrays to some extent the influence of the other--is1 that the ,fleming took his types from real life1 the ,florentine from his conceptions of angelic existence4 ,all the rest of ,europe was behind the two favoured countries in which pictorial and decorative art now reached their culminating point4 ,sentimental writers have been1 from time immemorial1 in the habit of scouting at wealth and of pouring enthusiastic praise upon penury1 as though the two conditions were equivalent to vice and virtue in morals1 to dulness and genius in intellect4 ,it is quite true that an impoverished state of society produces better poetry than a rich one2 but it is equally true that the finest artistic work is born amid luxurious surroundings4 ,it was the wealth of ,ghent1 ,bruges1 ,antwerp1 and ,brussels which attracted talent to a warmer air in which it could grow and flourish1 on the border land between the ,celt and the ,teuton1 with all the advantages derivable from either side4 ,in the same way the riches and luxury of ,venice1 ,florence1 ,rome1 ,naples1 ,verona1 ,cremona1 ,padua1 stimulated the faculties of men who had inherited the traditions of ,grco-,roman art4 ,it was a brilliant autumn in the annals of illumination1 but a short one1 by reason of the changes which the new art of ,printing had brought about in all things4 ,drer visited ,bruges and ,venice2 he admired the work of ,gerard ,david and of the ,italian miniaturists1 but he did not seek to imitate or to rival their efforts4 ,he belonged to the modern world1 and he gave to the art of engraving what he would1 twenty years earlier1 have given to the art of illumination4 ,we have nothing to do here with his profession as a painter of canvases in which he followed the same tendency as had during the fifteenth century so wonderfully multiplied the number of ,giotto's descendants in ,italy4 ,we may imagine1 if we choose1 what wonderful illuminators of manuscripts were lost in ,schongauer1 ,drer1 and ,lucas van ,leyden1 three men who owed #hjtheir artistic existence and taste to the atmosphere of rich cities4 ,from the year #adej the career of ,calligrapher and ,illuminator had been doomed to extinction4 ,its members gradually retired from an unequal strife with the clever mechanics from ,mentz2 some became printers1 some became engravers1 and others joined the ranks of the canvas-painters4 ,those who remained true to their early training achieved the most brilliant triumphs of their profession before it was extinguished4 ,this is the reason why we look to the ,flanders1 and to the ,italy of #adhj-aebj1 for the most absolutely perfect work that was ever produced in the illumination of manuscripts4 ,considering that it flourished side by side with the paintings of the ,bellinis and of ,andrea ,mantegna1 and that it was in touch with the times of ,lionardo1 of ,raphael1 of ,michel ,angiolo1 of ,titian1 and of ,paolo ,veronese1 we cannot wonder either at its marvellous beauty or at its sudden withering4 ,of the late ,flemish school1 certain work done for the ,austrian ,archduchess ,margaret 7resident in ,bruges with her brother ,philip1 as children of ,maximilian who had become sovereign of the ,low ,countries in right of his wife ,mary of ,burgundy71 of which the famous ,grimani ,breviary is only one amongst some ten or twelve examples--was the finest of its kind4 ,the present writer has possessed one of them--a little volume internally justifying the tradition that it was illuminated by ,gerard ,david for the ,archduchess 7 4 4 ,margot la gente demoiselle ,qu' eut deux maris et si mourut pucelle as she once suggested for her own epitaph when in danger from a storm at sea7 for presentation to her sister-in-law ,juana1 the heiress of ,castile 7,juana la ,loca1 the ,crazy ,jane who has become a personage in nursery lore74 ,as for the ,italian school1 it was of wider extent4 ,the illuminators found generous patrons at ,milan1 at ,venice1 at ,padua1 at ,cremona1 at ,verona1 at ,florence1 at ,bologna1 at ,rome1 and at ,naples4 ,in the last city1 the ,kings of #ha;,aragonese origin were noble employers of talent1 and found their chief rivals in the ,medicis1 and in ,mathias ,corvinus1 the ,king of ,hungary1 who divided with them the patronage of the best ,italian miniaturists4 ,they also helped to stamp on ,spanish work the ,italian impress which characterises it in the last half of the fifteenth century1 and thereby to continue the line which in contact with ,naples on the one hand1 with ,bruges on the other1 formed at the end of the century a ring1 uniting ,flanders and ,italy as its chief jewels4 ,the name of ,attavante1 so famous as a ,florentine miniaturist1 reminds me of a ,petrarch manuscript which ,i have seen sold in ,paris as illustrated by him4 ,one of the illuminations contained a bust of a ,roman warrior1 in the style so frequently seen in ,italian work of about the year #aejj1 and under it were the initials ,m4,a41 intended evidently for ,marcus ,aurelius or ,marcus ,antonius4 ,out of them1 the cataloguers of two different collections of great repute1 had evolved the idea that they stood for ,maestro ,attavante--an absurd notion for which there was absolutely no excuse whatever4 ,other famous ,italian miniaturists were ,girolamo dai ,libri of ,verona1 and ,sigismondo da ,carpio4 ,i have had examples of the art of both4 ,one still more celebrated was ,giulio ,clovio1 but he belonged entirely to the sixteenth century and to the late ,renaissance1 and his work is in nowise that of the ,middle ,ages4 ,it is over-florid and reveals the theatrical splendour which always accompanies decline4 ,i have possessed one of his finest examples1 which was formerly in the ,towneley library4 ,during the last twenty years of the fifteenth century1 a favourite style of border among the ,italians was an imitation of goldsmith's work4 ,gems of various colours set in gold1 with cameos or medallions of classic busts1 were the chief feature1 but spaces were always left in which the miniaturist could paint his tiny exquisite figures of the fight between ,david and ,goliath1 or something of the kind4 ,venetian #hb;examples of such miniatures are remarkably beautiful--the beauty mingled with a certain gravity of manner2 those which are of ,roman origin have an air of masterly splendour2 but those which were produced at ,florence between #adhj and #aeaj are so lovely as to upset our critical judgment in comparing them with work done at ,bruges4 ,in the border-illustration there never was any resemblance between the work of ,italy and that of other countries1 and there can be no hesitation in deciding between them in favour of ,italy as more appropriately decorative4 ,i possess a ,psalter written and illuminated for ,pietro dei ,medici1 apparently about #adij1 in which the first two pages are stained light green1 so as to soften and make delicate the numerous tints found in the painting and border upon one of them4 ,these are the work probably of ,attavante1 and can hardly be excelled for the exquisite taste and finish both of the miniature and of the ornamentation4 ,i have also had a charming little ,prayerbook written for ,lorenzo the ,magnificent1 which was evidently from the same hand2 and a ,siennese ,psalter of kindred type and of the same period4 ,the loveliness of these ,tuscan examples takes away all possibility of critical fault-finding4 ,they delight the eye with a fuller satisfaction than even the best of the ,flemish illuminations4 ,the latter we examine carefully1 with a continual increase of admiration2 while we enjoy the harmonious beauty of the ,florentine1 we feel that the critic's functions are set aside4 ,the writing of the late ,italian ,,mss41 among which classical texts rival the books of prayers in the elegance of their adornment1 was more frequently ,roman than gothic1 but a fine black-letter hand survived into the sixteenth century1 especially at ,venice4 ,the initials decorated with interlacements1 in a style that evinced its ,irish origin1 which are found in ,italian manuscripts after #acej were retained till near the end of the fifteenth century in ,venice and ,naples1 but they had fallen out of use in ,tuscany #hcsomewhat earlier1 being hardly appropriate to the rich neo-classical style of ,florentine border-decoration4 ,as for the ,italian styles of writing after the twelfth century1 they were various4 ,the ,carolingian in a bold and handsome type lasted longer in ,italy than elsewhere2 but both it and the ,lombard were passing away about the year #abjj4 ,the thirteenth century saw the evolution of the gothic letter out of the ,carolingian1 in ,italy as well as over the rest of ,europe1 but in ,italy it was accompanied by a sort of ,carolingian cursive1 slightly sloped1 which finally developed the two forms now familiar over all the world--,roman and ,italic4 ,in the fourteenth century a beautiful square gothic letter was in use in ,italy1 and remained unaltered in form till the end of the fifteenth2 but it was not unaccompanied by various other styles of writing4 ,the ,italic was still in its primitive stage without elegance1 and some books were written in a gothic letter derived from ,french and ,german models1 and quite unlike the square ,italian gothic4 ,the script of the book1 from which a facsimile is given on plate #ab1 is an example of this outlandishness4 ,before the fifteenth century arrived the cursive hand had split into its two branches4 ,the more elaborately written letters were upright1 and tended to restore the ,carolingian original2 the less elaborate characters began to slope still further1 and by degrees became a separate script1 which then became cultivated4 ,the writing of ,petrarch 7who died in #acgd7 was chosen as the model for the first ,italic types used in printing 7#aeja72 and the upright round hand used by numerous ,florentine and ,venetian calligraphers towards the middle of the fifteenth century was chosen as the model of the first ,roman types1 cut by ,sweynheym and ,pannartz in the ,benedictine monastery of ,subbiaco1 not far from ,rome1 in the year #adfd4 ,remarks on the subjects reproduced in the plates ,the first plate represents portion of a hieroglyphical #hdtext written on a roll of papyrus which was wrapped up with the mummy of the man whose virtues are recorded on it4 ,as for the exact age and contents of the roll1 it is beyond my capacity to say anything definite2 but there is a delicacy in the drawing of the figures and in the formation of the letters which seem to indicate a considerable age1 probably not less than twelve hundred years ,b4,c4 ,each column of the writing has to be read from top to bottom1 beginning with the first column on the left4 ,it has been said in an earlier page that the hieratic and demotic scripts differed from the hieroglyphic in being written like ,hebrew in long horizontal lines from right to left4 ,the difference is1 however1 merely formal4 ,if we turn the hieroglyphic page half round1 so that the right side becomes the bottom1 and the left side the top of the page1 we can see the inscription run in hieratic fashion from right to left4 ,plate #b is perhaps more difficult to decipher than ,plate #a4 ,we know1 however1 that the demotic script was used only amongst laymen in matters of business and of money2 and this no doubt represents some commercial transaction that took place between #ejj and #bjj ,b4,c4 ,the demotic was a complex cursive evolved from the hieratic2 its invention1 or at least its use to any considerable degree1 does not appear to have been much antecedent to #fjj ,b4,c41 and there was little necessity for its continuance after the second century ,b4,c4 ,it was probably about the beginning of the ,christian era that the demotic finally disappeared before the ,coptic1 an alphabet derived from the ,greek1 of which ,plate #c gives an example4 ,the ,arabic heading which accompanies the ,coptic rubric above the ,psalm that begins below 7the #aahth ,greek3 ri71 is in a hand of the latter part of the fifteenth century4 ,notwithstanding the lateness of the specimen1 the script takes its proper place here as representing a script of the first century4 ,plate #d is taken from a copy1 written on vellum at #he,nabls1 of the ,samaritan ,pentateuch4 ,both in language and in letters it represents the old ,hebrew of the days of ,solomon1 long anterior to the time when ,ezra introduced from ,chalda the square characters now called ,hebrew2 the ancient letters having been preserved by a small remnant in ,north ,palestine4 ,the writing resembles that of the ,phoenicians1 and the example given on plate #d1 notwithstanding its lateness1 does not exhibit a very much modified form of the character4 ,plate #e is from an ,abyssinian ,,ms4 of the sixteenth century1 on the ,life of the ,virgin4 ,the real origin of the artistic decoration is unmistakable4 ,it is what we call ,byzantine1 but ought rather to be called gypto-,grecian4 ,the people of ,abyssinia1 who were mainly ,southern ,arabs or ,sabans1 received their instruction in art along with their ,christianity a few centuries after the beginning of the era1 and they have never abandoned them4 ,as for the writing which appears on the plate1 it is in the old ,geez or ,ethiopic language1 and descended from that of the ,saban people whose monumental inscriptions in ,himyaritic language and characters are now attracting considerable interest4 ,plate #f is from a ,greek ,gospelbook written on vellum1 which was brought to ,england from ,cyprus by ,cesnola4 ,the ornamental border at the top is somewhat freer and less stiff in style than those which we find in most of the ,byzantine ,,mss42 and the writing is neater and less negligent than if it had been executed in the eleventh or twelfth century4 ,it slopes a little backwards and has the breathings in their antique form as halves of the letter ,h4 ,hence ,i have assigned it to the latter part of the tenth century4 ,on plate #g ,i have given a reduction after ,westwood of a page from an ,irish ,,ms4 now in the ,archiepiscopal ,library at ,lambeth4 ,although it is of comparatively late date 7the ninth century71 and the writing is the ,irish script in its second or wholly minuscule stage1 the ornamentation is #hfsufficient to show what ,irish work had been and still was4 ,the marvellously elaborate convolutions and interlacements1 the dexterous use of colours1 the utter absence of gold1 and the introduction of grotesque animal figures1 are all seen in this plate from the ,gospelbook of ,mac,durnan4 7,while ,i write ,i am reminded of a personal experience which ,i may be forgiven for setting down in print4 ,when ,westwood's great book had come out1 ,i was one day speaking with an ,english lady of high social position1 cultivated and accomplished in many branches of knowledge1 to whom after mentioning ,westwood ,i expressed my admiration of what the ,irish calligraphers had done in the seventh and eighth centuries1 when art was so low in most of the other lands of ,europe4 ,the lady listened with patient good-breeding1 till ,i paused1 and then said quietly1 ,i presume that you are yourself an ,irishman6 ,she had evidently mistaken one unfamiliar accent for another1 and her remark was a polite criticism upon my credulity or veracity47 ,plate #ba 7which ought to have been inserted in succession to plate #g7 reproduces a miniature from a ,breviary written about #aaej-fj for ,isengrim1 ,abbot of the ,benedictine ,monastery at ,ottenbeuern in ,suabia4 ,the miniature reproduced is a picture of the ,ascension1 and shows the ,saviour standing in an almond-shaped frame1 supported and borne aloft by four angels4 ,the ,virgin and the ,apostles are looking upwards from below1 and the picture is enclosed within a square blue border1 this being lighted by ornamental fretwork in white4 ,the faces are generally well drawn1 and the rapt attention in the eyes of the uplookers is very skilfully depicted4 ,the colours used are blue1 green1 yellow1 red1 chesnut1 and white4 ,the whole effect is reminiscent of ,anglo-,saxon work1 and one might easily1 at first sight1 mistake it for a picture out of an ,english book of the tenth century4 ,a somewhat similar design of the same subject is found in ,king ,athelstan's ,psalter--an ,anglo-,saxon ,,ms4 of the late ninth century1 now #hg;in the ,british ,museum2 but the ,suabian illustration is decidedly inferior in taste and delicacy of treatment4 ,it shows1 however1 such a kinship that we are inclined to believe in a nearer connexion between ,german and ,english art than between ,german and ,french ,carolingian4 ,plates #h and #i reproduce miniatures from two manuscripts of the ,latin ,bible1--the first page of ,genesis in each4 ,the first is either ,english or ,norman work1 perhaps rather the latter than the former1 and is interesting as affording one of the earliest examples of the border with leaves of the so-called ivy pattern4 ,the writing is a beautiful early gothic of the transition period between the ,carolingian round hand and the medival square gothic4 ,it is unmistakably ,norman1 if not ,anglo-,norman1 but may have been ,english4 ,if the reds in the tiny miniatures had been a little more pinkish1 and the blue a little lighter1 we should have had no hesitation in calling it ,english work4 ,in plate #i1 the writing is somewhat rounder and the ink is paler--showing that the work is neither ,english nor ,norman2 and we find in the minute pictures a style of design1 both in the figures and the draperies1 which reminds us of late classical art4 ,the interlaced pattern in the lowest portion of the ornament is also a survival of the ,celtic manner which might be found in ,southern ,france1 but which had ceased to be used in ,english work1 except in the decoration of letters4 ,on the plate1 the picture is dated #acaj-bj2 but we may venture to think that it was executed in ,south-,eastern ,france about the year #acjj4 ,the design and the writing on plate #aj are thoroughly ,english of the end of the thirteenth century4 ,the picture is unfinished1 having been left by the artist in its sketch-condition1 uncoloured4 ,the faces are blank1 and the drawing simply in outline2 but the careful treatment of the folds in the drapery is remarkable4 ,the miniature is one of several illustrating the ,apocalypse1 which were done in the convent at ,eaton or ,nun-,eaton in ,warwickshire about #abhj4 ,the #hh;,apocalypse is not given in its ,latin summaries1 as was usual1 but in ,french quatrains of ,english origin4 ,the volume which contains these drawings is interesting1 as having been a sort of omnium gatherum1 made up for the ladies of ,eaton at the end of the thirteenth century4 ,one of the pieces it contains is a ,bestiaire by ,william the ,trouvre1 an ,englishman of the twelfth century2 a ,french poem called the ,chastel d',amours by ,raymond ,grosseteste2 and a popular ,english poem of the time1 of which another example has been lately published in facsimile in his ,english ,palography by the ,rev4 ,walter ,w4 ,skeat4 ,the miniature of the ,crucifixion which is reproduced on plate #aa is visibly ,italian work of the rudest style4 ,it is taken from a ,missal1 written in a hand which is also ,italian of the end of the thirteenth century1 but gothic in form4 ,the liturgical character of the book is1 however1 such that we may believe it to have been produced in ,england1 perhaps by an ,italian ,cistercian monk4 ,the writing on the miniature is in so-called ,lombardic uncials1 a script which was used for capitals nearly everywhere in the thirteenth century4 ,the three figures in the picture have red or auburn hair1 a favourite colour at all times among the ,italians1 even after the ,flemings had introduced a blackhaired ,christ4 ,another noticeable feature is the building with an arcade and windows1 in the lower background4 ,plate #ab is an illustration of the story of ,troilus and ,cressida1 taken from ,guido ,colonna's ,tale of ,troy4 ,it is ,venetian1 of about the years #accj-dj1 and exhibits the ,italian style of using strong pigments for their figures4 ,whatever the faults of drawing may be1 this is a real painting done with a full brush4 ,there is no appearance of the outlines drawn with a pen or a fine brush1 such as we see in ,french and ,english work1 and the folds in the draperies appear to be produced by broad shadowings after the main body of colour had been painted4 ,in fact1 it seems to be1 like other ,italian illuminations1 the work of a painter1 not #hiof a miniaturist4 ,the place of origin is revealed by the calligrapher's instructions to the artist1 which occur on several pages in a minute hand1 and which are written in a pure ,venetian dialect4 ,the manuscript is illustrated with an unusual quantity of pictorial designs4 ,the writing is remarkable as resembling that of the ,english charters of the same period1 but with greater regularity and evenness in the downstrokes4 ,plate #ac is reproduced from a ,french ,apocalypse of the fourteenth century1 with a text in ,french prose4 ,the writing is gothic1 much changed from the style of the thirteenth century1 and less regular and elegant4 ,the picture is thoroughly ,french1 of the time when ,english illuminators had yielded up their supremacy to the men of the ,french school4 ,we see the fine outlines and features as we are accustomed to see them in thirteenth century work1 offering in their delicate style a curious contrast to the broad free paintiness of the illustration in plate #ab4 ,the ,apocalypse1 from which the plate is taken1 is a ,french work of the middle of the fourteenth century1 showing a good deal of the feeling of the preceding century1 but tending visibly towards the manner of the time when ,charles ,v of ,france and his brothers were associated with manuscripts of an unusually beautiful kind4 ,plate #ad is an example of ,french grisaille in its earlier stage4 ,the four designs look like fine chalk drawings prepared for the use of an engraver1 rather than like finished illustrations in a book4 ,there is an ease and freedom in the figure-drawing which reveal the hand of a true artist1 and the treatment of the draperies is excellent2 but the landscape accessories in the lower two divisions are primitive in their absurdity and childish execution4 ,the writing in this example1 and in plate #ac also1 is typical fourteenth century gothic2 small1 cramped1 square1 and angular4 ,the border is of the early ivy-leaf pattern1 stiff and not natural1 but not inelegant as decoration4 ,the style and character of #ijthe two plates are essentially ,french1 and could not be found in examples of illumination at the period anywhere outside of ,france4 ,plate #ae introduces us to a totally different kind and style of ornament4 ,there is no appearance of stiffness here in the border1 with its bold conventional foliage of light blue and green1 and the long feathery lines that sweep out from it in free and graceful curves4 ,the miniature too is full of merit both in design and execution1 its only drawback being the rather ugly pattern of the green flooring4 ,the seated priest is in the full costume of a doctor or literatus of ,chaucer's time2 and the expression in his features1 as well as in those of the kneeling ,gower1 is excellently rendered4 ,the writing here is not the square angular gothic of the two preceding plates1 but a more rounded script1 partaking of the nature of the charter hand1 which was appropriated to the ,english language4 ,the a is the only letter in it quite identical with that of the fourteenth century gothic1 and the p 7for th7 shows the survival of ,anglo-,saxon writing1 just as the w shows us a modern ,english letter at a tolerably early stage of its growth4 ,the k is likewise noteworthy1 as being the peculiar form of the letter which had been evolved in the rapid writing of court-scribes1 and which is still used in ,german manuscript4 ,plate #af shows us ,franco-,flemish art in a phase in which the simple mastery of design had become subordinate to the brilliancy and magnificence of decoration4 ,the inner border of interwoven blue and red lines upon a ground of gold is connected with1 and grows out of1 the illuminated initial in a suitably appropriate fashion1 but the outer border of conventional foliage1 red1 blue1 green1 and yellow1 with its inserted figures of a kneeling man and a hybrid dromedary1 has no comprehensible affinity to the rest of the work1 and is tacked on without any reason beyond the desire for splendour and variety4 ,the style is not distinctively ,flemish1 although the painting was done at #ia,tournay4 ,it is rather a development out of ,franco-,burgundian models1 and more suggestive of ,french origin than any other2 in fact1 the extension of central ,french influence northwards through ,burgundy4 ,in plate #ag there is real ,flemish work4 ,here is pure grisaille at its best2 no infusion of extraneous colour in the design1 except in the tesselated pavement of yellow and white marble1 and no glitter of illumination beyond what is given by a gold crown in the hands of one figure1 and a couple of gold chains on the breasts of two others4 ,this is indeed a true historical picture broadly conceived1 well composed1 and admirably executed4 ,the perspective is excellent1 and we realise clearly the size and depth of the large vaulted chamber1 lighted only from the doorways and the open window-spaces1--in which the eight personages are grouped4 ,the manuscript from which the miniature is taken was written and illustrated1 almost undoubtedly1 at ,bruges about #adgj for a nobleman of the ,lannoy family1 a member not of the principal house which still flourished in ,flanders1 but of the transplanted branch in ,picardy4 ,plate #ah is taken from an ,english manuscript of considerable interest4 ,a number of armorial bearings1 which are found on the margins of the pages1 show that it was written either for the ,marquis of ,dorset1 ,edward ,,iv's son-in-law1 or for one of his children4 ,whichever was the case1 the book was in the possession of ,john ,grey1 dominus de ,blisworth1 the son or near relative of the ,marquis1 in the early part of the sixteenth century2 and there is a record added in the calendar of the death of ,dame ,elizabeth ,grey1 this ,john's wife1 about #aebj-cj4 ,the miniatures are good1 but not excellent2 better in composition than in design1 and showing grave deficiencies with regard to perspective4 ,they are1 however1 well executed and well painted2 and the borders are remarkably elegant4 ,the conventional large foliage1 of architectonic character1 is admirably disposed upon small and appropriate fields of gold2 and the twining #ib;branchlets that bear tiny buds and small leaves and flowers are not so crowded as to hide the vellum ground4 ,the border is indeed a fine decorative composition1 without a fault1 and thoroughly ,english in style4 ,there is an inscription at the foot of the miniature which inspires curiosity to learn who the writer was4 ,she was evidently a woman of high position2 for only such a personage would have been allowed to write in a ,prayerbook of the kind4 ,the words are1 ,madame1 ,i pray you remember her that ys yours and evver sall be1 but the bookbinder has unfortunately cut off the signature4 ,the person addressed was no doubt ,dame ,elizabeth ,grey4 ,the writing is strangely like that of ,henry ,,vii1 but cannot of course have been his4 ,it is possibly as late as #aebj4 ,plate #bb is from a ,prayerbook written and illuminated about #aebj-cj for a certain ,giovanni ,bentivoglio4 ,if the book had been a dozen or twenty years earlier than it seems to be1 one might have supposed that it was executed at ,bologna1 by the order and for the use of the last ,bentivoglio who ruled in that city4 ,as1 however1 he died in exile and misfortune in #aejh1 the ,giovanni to whom the prayerbook belonged1 must have been his grandson1 born about #aeaj1 who was in the imperial service in #aecj4 ,the artistic merit of the illumination is considerable1 but they are over-florid and mark a decay of taste4 ,the colours are vivid and harmonious1 gold is plentifully used1 and the beauty of the work is undeniable2 but it is meretricious and corrupt in style4 ,italian examples of the period are1 however1 rare and highly prized4 ,on plate #ai we have a large initial 7,o7 cut from an ,italian ,antiphonal or ,gradual1 written probably about #aedj-ej4 ,it encloses a miniature representing the ,adoration of the three ,kings1 painted with so much skill as to suggest the hand of some student of ,titian's school4 ,in design1 composition1 and execution1 it is very good2 the only drawback being the superfine air of courtly elegance #icwhich is seen in every figure beneath the thatched roof of the stable4 ,there is a theatrical character in the whole performance1 that reminds us of ,federico ,baroccio4 ,of similar date is the picture on plate #bj4 ,it comes from a ,gospel-lesson book1 written in a mitred abbey on the ,german side of the ,rhine1 probably not far from ,cologne1 in the year #aedh4 ,the design of the company of monks headed by their ,abbot1 all in white raiment and kneeling before an unseen altar1 is excellent ,german work4 ,the landscape with distant towers1 seen through the pillars of an arcade behind would look better than it does1 if it were not for the floating cherubs who hover in the spaces1 and support two armorial shields4 ,the border is a close imitation of the late ,flemish style4 ,on a yellow ground1 lighted with twining gold branchlets1 cut flowers are vividly painted1 along with figures of a bee1 a fox1 a bird1 a rabbit1 and a hybrid animal like an ape4 #id;,,index4 ,aachen1 metropolis of the ,frankish ,empire1 #dd ,abyssinia1 writing in1 #ab1ac ,abyssinian ,,ms4 ,life of the ,virgin1 #he ,adamnan 7,st471 #bh1 #cf ,adoration of the ,magi1 a miniature1 #ib ,ai-gupt1 ,semitic name of the ,delta1 #h ,akkadian writing1 #g1 #i ,alcuin at ,tours and ,aachen1 #dd ,amber-trade1 #bi ,ambrosian use in the ,milanese liturgy1 #ec ,angles civilized1 #cd ,anglo-,saxon alphabet1 #bf1 #cb -- decoration of ,,ms41 #ce1 #cg ,antiphonale1 #ed ,apocalypse ,,mss41 #gc1 #hi ,apocalyptic designs1 ,english work1 #hg ,arabian writing 7,arabic71 #bj ,arabian 7,south7 writing1 #ab ,arabic language1 #ba -- writing1 #bj1 #hd ,aragonese ,kings of ,naples1 #hj ,araman ,chaldees1 #aa1 #ab ,ascension1 ,pictures of the1 #hf ,asoka's ,rock-inscriptions1 #ah ,assyrian ,empire formed1 #aj ,assyriology1 #f ,attavante1 work done by1 #ha1 #hb ,babylonian monarchies1 #g1 #i1 #aj ,bactrian ,kingdom1 #ah ,barbarians1 movements of the1 #db ,baroccio 7,federico71 #ic ,bastaru1 a ,gothic people1 #bi ,bede1 the ,venerable1 #cd1 #cg ,bentivoglio 7,giovanni71 ,prayer book1 #ib ,berossus1 ,assyrian ,chronicle1 #f ,bible1 its influence on writing1 #bc -- multiplied by scribes1 #eb -- ,greek1 #bd #ie -- ,syriac1 #bd -- ,hebrew1 #bd -- ,latin ,,mss41 #hg ,bologna school of law1 #eg ,book 7origin of the word71 #b ,borders in ,,mss41 #fb1 #fe1 #ga1 #gf ,boustrophedon writing1 #af ,brgilles ,livre d',heures1 #ge ,breviary1 foundation of the1 #ec -- constitution of the1 #fg -- ,,ms4 written at ,ottenbeuern1 #hf ,britain ,celtiberian1 #bg -- ,gallic1 #bg -- ,latin1 #bg -- ,english1 #bg ,british ,isles1 age of writing in1 #bg ,bruges ,,mss41 #ha1 #ia ,burgundian school of art1 #fe1 #gd1 #ia ,burmese writing1 #ba ,byzantine ornamentation1 #be -- ,art not ,hellenic1 #dg ,cadmus the ,phoenician1 #aj ,calendars in ,prayer books1 #fg ,calligraphy extinguished by ,printing1 #hj ,canon ,law1 #eg ,canonical ,hours1 #ec ,canterbury school of writing1 #ei ,capitals in writing1 #be ,carolingian art1 #ce1 #cg1 #dc1 #ei -- writing1 #dj1 #dc ,celtic ,church1 #ec ,cesnola 7,l4 ,p4 di71 #he ,chalda1 age of writing in1 #g ,chaldees 7,turanian or ,akkad71 #i -- 7,araman or ,semitic71 #aa ,charles the ,great1 #ce1 #da1 #dc ,charters1 style of writing used in1 #bf1 #ed1 #ee ,charter hand in ,england1 #gb ,chastel d',amours1 ,,ms41 #hh ,chinese origins1 #ac ,christ blackhaired in pictures1 #hh ,chronology of the ,bible1 #f #if ,chrysography1 #c1 #bf1 #fj ,churches 7,early ,christian71 #ec ,civil ,law1 #eg ,classic survival in ,italy1 #ce ,clovio 7,giulio7 ,miniatures1 #ha ,colonna 7,guido7 ,tale of ,troy1 #hh ,colours in miniatures and ornament1 #fa ,columba 7,st471 #cf ,coptic alphabet1 #be -- writing1 #i1 #hd ,cufic writing1 #bj ,cursive ,roman1 #bf1 #bh ,cymry of ,north ,england1 #cc -- settled in ,wales1 #cc ,cyril 7,st471 #eb ,cyrillic alphabet1 #ea ,david 7,gerard7 of ,bruges1 #gh1 #hj ,decoration of ,,mss41 ,irish1 #ce1 #cf -- ,anglo-,saxon1 #ce -- ,frankish1 #cg1 #dc -- ,gallo-,roman1 #dd1 #dg -- ,english1 #de -- ,german1 #de -- ,spanish1 #df -- ,italian1 #df -- ,byzantine1 #df1 #dg ,demotic writing 7,egyptian71 #i1 #hd ,deutsch1 meaning of the word1 #ca ,devanagari alphabet1 #ah1 #ba ,diplomatic writing1 #bf1 #ed1 #ee ,drawing and design1 ,medival1 #fb ,durer 7,albert71 #gi ,durham school of writing1 #ei ,eginhart1 the ,frank1 #dc ,egypt called ,khem1 #e1 #h -- -- ,aigupt1 #h -- -- ,mizraim1 ,misr1 #h -- ,age of writing in1 #e ,egyptology1 #f ,england the centre of ,french art and literature1 #fb ,english ,art in ,,mss41 #di1 #fj1 #fb1 #gb1 #ij1 #ia -- ,calendars in ,hor1 #fi -- illuminated borders1 #fe1 #gg1 #ij #ig -- ,,ms4 ,bible ,sec4 ,,xiii41 #hg ,estrangelo ,syriac1 #bj ,ethiopic language1 #he -- writing1 #ab ,etruscan alphabet1 #af ,euchologium1 #ed ,evangeliarium1 ,german ,,ms41 #ic ,flemish school of art1 #gd1 #gf1 #gi1 #ij1 #ia -- ,calendars in ,hor1 #fh -- illuminated borders1 #gh ,floral borders1 #fe ,florentine miniatures1 #gh1 #ha ,formation and use of books1 #c ,france 7,central7 ,,mss4 produced in1 #fb ,frankish empire1 #ci -- writing1 #bh1 #cg1 #ci ,french art in ,,mss41 #fj1 #fb1 #gc -- ,calligraphy and ornamentation1 #di -- ,calendars in ,hor1 #fh -- illuminated borders1 #fe1 #gg -- ,,ms4 ,latin ,bibles1 #acjj1 #hg ,gallic language1 #cj ,gallican use in liturgy1 #ec ,gaul1 ,age of writing in1 #bb -- ,greek writing in1 #bb ,german ,art in ,,mss41 #hf -- ,calendar in liturgies1 #gj -- illumination1 #fa -- -- in ,flemish style1 #ic -- writing1 #ga ,germany1 name of1 #cj ,girolamo dai ,libri1 #ha ,glagolitic alphabet1 #ea ,glastonbury school of writing1 #ei ,gloucester calendar1 #fi ,gospel of ,st4 ,peter1 #dh ,gothic alphabet 7,wulfila's71 #be1 #bh1 #ca -- ,kingdom in ,spain1 #bc -- ,kingdom in ,italy1 #da -- medival writing1 #cb1 #fe ,goths and ,germans1 #bh ,gower 7,john7 in a miniature of the ,confessio ,amantis1 #ij ,graduale of the missal1 #ed ,greek alphabet1 #aj1 #ac1 #ad -- ,bibles1 #ec -- ,colonies1 #ae #ih -- ,gospels1 ,,ms41 ,sec4 ,x41 #he -- writing1 minuscules1 #dg ,gregory 7,st471 #ed ,grey 7,thomas7 ,marquis of ,dorset1 #ia -- 7,john and ,elizabeth71 #ia ,grimani ,breviary1 #hj ,grisaille painting1 #ge1 #hi1 #ia ,grosseteste 7,raymond71 #hh ,guthones1 #bi ,hebrew language1 #ai -- writing in square letters1 #ai1 #hd ,hellenised ,oriental peoples1 #bc ,herculaneum1 writing at1 #be ,heures d',anne de ,bretagne1 #gh ,hieratic writing in ,egypt1 #i -- ,,ms4 on papyrus1 #hd ,hieroglyphic writing 7,egyptian71 #i -- ,,ms4 on papyrus1 #hc ,himyaritic alphabet1 #ab ,hor for private prayer1 #ef1 #fg -- of ,french work1 #gd -- of ,english work1 #fi1 #gf1 #gg1 #ij -- constitution of1 #fg ,horologium1 #ed ,hours1 the ,canonical1 #ec1 #ef ,hours of the ,virgin1 see ,hor ,hrabanus ,maurus1 #cj ,huntingfield ,psalter1 ,,ms41 #gc ,hyksos or ,shepherd ,kings in ,egypt1 #aa ,hymnals1 #ed1 #eh ,iberian writing in ,spain1 #bb ,iceland and its literature1 #ea ,illumination 7,medival71 origin of1 #cf ,india1 age of writing in1 #ah1 #ba ,indian languages 7modern71 #ba ,initials illuminated1 #fb1 #fd ,ink used in ,,mss41 #c ,ireland1 writing in1 #bh1 #cb ,irish alphabet1 #bf -- ,,ms41 #bh1 #cf -- ,mac,durnan's ,gospels1 #he -- ornamentation in ,,mss41 #he -- teachers of the ,angles1 #cd ,isengrim1 ,abbot of ,ottenbeuern1 #hf ,italian art1 #fb1 #gi1 #ib #ii -- late classical art1 #fj -- miniatures1 #hh1 #ib -- ,picture of the ,crucifixion1 #hh -- ,schools of ,illumination1 #gj -- ,saints in ,calendars1 #gj ,italic characters1 #hc ,italy1 age of writing in1 #ae ,italy1 various hands used in1 #hc ,ivy-leaf borders1 #fc ,jerome 7,st471 #ea ,jornandes the ,gothic historian1 #db ,juana la ,loca1 #hj ,khem1 name of old ,egypt1 #e1 #h ,lannoy1 ,low country family1 #ia ,latin alphabet1 origin of the1 #ag ,latin ,bible1 #eb -- -- ,,mss41 #hg -- ,liturgies1 #ec ,lectronaries1 #ed ,lenormant 7,francois71 #aa ,liturgical books1 #ff -- frequently transcribed1 #ec ,liturgies in the vernacular1 #eg ,lindisfarne school of writing1 #ei ,livres d',heures--see ,hor ,lombardic writing1 #ch1 #dj1 #da -- uncials1 #hh ,lombards1 ,the ,kingdom of the1 #dj ,lombardy 7,cisalpine ,gaul71 #bb -- under the ,goths1 #dj1 #da -- under the ,lombards1 #da -- under the ,franks1 #da ,mac,durnan's ,gospels1 ,irish ,,ms41 #hf ,madden 7,sir ,frederick71 #cg ,manchu script1 #bb ,manetho1 ,egyptian ,chronicle1 #f ,,mss4 on purple vellum1 #bg1 #fj ,marcomanni1 #cj ,margaret of ,austria1 #hj ,marseilles1 ,greek colony1 #ae1 #bb ,materials of books1 #c ,mathias ,corvinus1 #hj #ajj ,medici1 patrons of art1 #hj -- 7,lorenzo dei7 ,prayer book1 #hb -- 7,pietro dei7 ,prayer book1 #hb ,memling 7,hans71 #gh ,menologium1 ,greek ,liturgy1 #ed ,merowingian writing1 #bh1 #ch ,minuscule letters1 #bf ,miroir ,historial1 ,,ms41 #ge1 #ia ,missal1 ,,mss41 #ed -- formation of1 #ec -- constitution of1 #ff -- ,anglo-,italian ,,ms41 #hh ,mizraim1 ,misr1 names of ,egypt1 #h ,moeso-,gothic ,alphabet1 #ca1 #da ,mongolian script1 #bb ,mozarabic liturgy1 #ec ,nagari alphabet1 #ah1 #ba ,naples1 work done at1 #hb ,naskhi ,arabic writing1 #bj ,norman ,conquest of ,england1 #fb ,norse ,runes1 #cj ,nuneaton ,convent1 work done in1 #hg ,ornamentation in ,,mss41 #fj ,oscan and ,umbrian writing1 #af ,ostrogoths1 #cb ,ottenbeuern ,,mss41 #hf ,oxford ,school of ,law1 #eh ,padua ,university1 #eh ,palography 7the word71 #b ,papal prohibition of vernacular liturgies1 #eg ,papyrus for books1 #d -- in ,assyria1 #h ,parchment for books1 #d ,paris ,university1 #dd1 #eh ,patrick 7,st471 #bh ,pehlvi writing1 #ai ,penitentialia1 #eg ,persian writing 7,cuneiform71 #g -- ,pehlvi1 #ai -- ,talik1 #ba ,perspective in miniatures1 #gf ,petrarch ,,ms4 attributed to ,attavante1 #ha ,philip ,i4 of ,castile 7,archduke of ,austria71 #hj ,phoenician colonies1 #ae -- use of letters1 #aj #aja ,photius1 ,bibliotheca1 #ed ,phrygian use of letters1 #ab ,pontificale1 #ed ,prakrit language1 #ah1 #ba ,prayer books for private persons1 #ee1 #ef ,primers1 #ef ,prisse ,papyrus1 #e ,processimale1 #ed ,psalter in the ,liturgy1 #ed -- for private prayer1 #ee ,ptah ,hotep's ,precepts1 #e ,punic writing in ,spain1 #bb ,reformation in the ,church1 #eg ,renaissance of ,literature1 #eh ,roman letters in their modern forms1 #hc ,roman origins1 #af -- writing1 #be ,roug 7,vicomte ,emm4 de71 #aa ,runic letters1 #bi ,rustic capitals1 #be ,ruskin 7,john71 #b ,sabaan use of letters1 #ab -- origin of ,abyssinians1 #he ,sacramentaries1 #ec1 #ed ,saints' names in ,calendars1 #fg1 #fh1 #fi ,samaritan alphabet1 #ai -- ,pentateuch1 #hd ,sanskrit language1 #ba ,sargon1 ,king of ,akkad1 #g ,sarum use1 #fi ,saxons and ,angles1 #cd ,scandinavia1 #db ,scandinavian writing1 ,anglo-,saxon1 #ej -- -- ,teutonic1 #ea -- -- ,runic1 #bi1 #ej ,scots1 ,irish pirates1 #cc ,scottish ,liturgies1 #fi ,semitic ,alphabet1 #aa ,semi-uncials1 #bf ,septuagint1 creation of the1 #bc ,siamese writing1 #ba ,sigismondo da ,carpio1 #ha ,singalese alphabet1 #ba ,skeat 7,rev4 ,w4 ,w471 #hh ,slavonic alphabets1 #ea ,slovene language and script1 #eb ,spain1 ,age of writing in1 #bb -- ,visigothic writing in1 #dc -- ,carolingian writing1 #dc #ajb -- medival ,gothic1 #dc ,spanish ,calendars in ,liturgies1 #gj -- ornamentation of ,,mss41 #fa ,stephens 7,george71 #bi ,stubbs 7,bishop71 #cc ,suevi1 #cj ,sweynheym and ,pannartz1 #hc ,synaxarium1 #ed ,syriac language1 #ai1 #bd ,syrians1 #ab ,talik writing 7,persian71 #ba ,terrien de la ,couperie 7,prof471 #ac ,teutonic1 #ca ,theodoric the ,ostrogoth1 #da ,theotisc1 #ca ,thibetan writing1 #ba ,thompson 7,e4 ,maunde71 #a1 #aa ,tournay ,hours1 #ge1 #ij ,tours1 ,abbey of ,st4 ,martin1 #dd ,troilus and ,cressida1 #hh ,troybook1 ,venetian ,,ms41 #hh ,turdetani of ,spain1 #bb ,ulfila--see ,wulfila ,umbrian and ,oscan writing1 #af ,uncials in writing1 #be ,vellum for books1 #d ,venetian ,art1 ,troybook1 #hh -- miniatures1 #ha1 #hb1 #hh ,visigoths1 #cb -- in ,spain1 #bc ,visigothic art1 #ci -- writing1 #ch1 #dj1 #db1 #dc ,volumes1 rolled books1 #c ,wales1 ,briton and ,cymry1 #cd ,welsh1 meaning of the word1 #ca ,westwood 7,professor71 #cc1 #cg ,william the ,trouvere1 #hh ,winchester school of writing1 #ei ,wulfila1 ,gothic ,bishop1 #ca ,york school of writing1 #dd1 #ei ,york use in ,liturgy1 #fi ,zend writing1 #ai ,illustration3 ,,portion ,,of ,a ,,funerary ,,inscription4 ,written on papyrus in the ,hieroglyphic character4 ,illustration3 ,,egyptian ,,inscription4 ,written on papyrus in the ,demotic character4 ,illustration3 ,a ,,page ,,from ,a ,,coptic ,,liturgy4 ,written in ,egypt in the fifteenth century4 ,illustration3 ,,samaritan ,,ms4 ,,on ,,vellum1 ,,probably ,,sec4 ,,xv4 ,leviticus1 ,x4 #af to ,,xi4 #ac4 ,illustration3 ,a ,,miniature ,,in ,,the ,,tamhera ,,maryam4 ,an ,ethiopic work on the life of the ,virgin1 written in #aebb4 ,illustration3 ,,the ,,first ,,page ,,of ,,st4 ,,john',s ,,gospel4 ,from a ,greek ,,ms4 of the ,tenth ,century1 brought by ,cesnola from ,cyprus4 ,illustration3 ,a ,,page ,,from ,,macdurnan',s ,,gospels4 ,a ,,ms4 written in ,ireland in the ,ninth ,century1 now at ,lambeth4 ,illustration3 ,,the ,,first ,,page ,,of ,,genesis4 ,in a ,latin ,bible1 written probably in ,england about #abij-acjj4 ,illustration3 ,,the ,,first ,,page ,,of ,,genesis4 ,in a ,latin ,bible written in ,france about #acaj-bj4 ,illustration3 ,,the ,,second ,,angel ,,blowing ,,his ,,trumpet4 ,from a series of unfinished designs illustrating the ,apocalypse2 executed at ,nuneaton about ,a4,d4 #abhj4 ,illustration3 ,,miniature ,,of ,,the ,,crucifixion4 ,in a ,missale written by an ,italian hand about #abij4 ,illustration3 ,,criseis ,,sent ,,back ,,to ,,the ,,greeks4 ,from a ,,ms4 of the ,liber ,trojanus written at ,venice about #acbe4 ,illustration3 ,a ,,page ,,from ,,the ,,revelations4 ,in a ,french ,,ms4 ,apocalypse ,figure1 written about #acfj4 ,illustration3 ,,first ,,page ,,of ,,the ,,roman ,,de ,,la ,,rose4 ,,ms4 written in ,france about #acgj4 ,illustration3 ,,john ,,gower ,,and ,,the ,,priest ,,of ,,venus4 ,from a ,,ms4 of ,gower's ,confessio ,amantis1 written before #acii4 ,illustration3 ,a ,,page ,,from ,a ,,livre ,d',,heures4 ,written at ,tournay about #adfe4 ,illustration3 ,,tiberius ,,receiving ,,the ,,imperial ,,crown4 ,from a ,,ms4 of the ,miroir ,historial1 written probably at ,bruges about #adgj4 ,illustration3 ,,christ ,,in ,,the ,,garden ,,of ,,gethsemane4 ,from the ,prayer book of ,grey1 ,marquis of ,dorset1 about #adgj4 ,illustration3 ,,adoration ,,of ,,the ,,magi4 ,from an ,italian ,chorale written about #aecj-dj4 ,illustration3 ,,an ,,abbot ,,and ,,monks ,,kneeling ,,before ,,an ,,altar4 ,from an ,evangeliarium illuminated in ,flemish style by a ,german hand in #aedh4 ,illustration3 ,,miniature ,,of ,,the ,,ascension4 ,from the ,suabian ,breviary written at ,ottenbeuern about #aafj4 ,illustration3 ,,the ,,first ,,page ,,of ,,the ,,office ,,of ,,the ,,virgin4 ,from the ,bentivoglio ,prayerbook1 written in ,italy about #aebj4 99 99 99 99 99 ,corrections made to printed text ,page #i3 ',the hieratic character was simply an abridgment of the hieroglyphic' corrected from ',the hieratic character was simply an abridgment of the hieratic' 767 ,page #ca3 ',gothic th' corrected from ',gothie th' ,index1 ,italy3 'various' corrected from 'varions' ,index1 ,mizraim3 corrected from ',mizzaim'