,sy/ematic ,!ology ,a ,comp5dium & ,commonplace-,book ,design$ ,= ,! ,use ,( ,!ological ,/ud5ts ,by ,augu/us ,hopk9s ,/rong1 ,d4,d41 ,,ll4,d4 ,presid5t & ,pr(essor ( ,biblical ,!ology 9 ! ,ro*e/] ,!ological ,sem9>y ,revis$ & ,enl>g$ ,9 ,?ree ,volumes ,volume #a ,! ,doctr9e ( ,god ,! ,judson ,press ,philadelphia1 ,bo/on1 ,*icago1 ,/4 ,l\is1 ,los ,angeles1 ,kansas ,city1 ,seattle1 ,toronto #aijg ,,cont5ts ,preface ,"p ,i4 ,prolegom5a4 ,*apt] ,i4 ,idea ,( ,!ology4 ,i4 ,def9ition ( ,!ology4 ,,ii4 ,aim ( ,!ology4 ,,iii4 ,possibility ( ,!ology4 #a4 ,! exi/5ce ( a ,god4 #b4 ,man's capacity = ! k ( ,god #c4 ,god's revelation ( himself to man4 ,,iv4 ,necessity ( ,!ology4 ,v4 ,relation ( ,!ology to ,religion4 #a4 ,d]ivation4 #b4 ,false ,conceptions4 #c4 ,ess5tial ,idea4 #d4 ,inf]5ces4 ,*apt] ,,ii4 ,mat]ial ( ,!ology4 ,i4 ,s\rces ( ,!ology4 #a4 ,scripture & ,nature4 #b4 ,scripture & ,rationalism4 #c4 ,scripture & ,my/icism4 #d4 ,scripture & ,romanism4 ,,ii4 ,limitations ( ,!ology4 ,,iii4 ,relations ( ,mat]ial to ,progress 9 ,!ology4 ,*apt] ,,iii4 ,me?od ,( ,!ology4 ,i4 ,requisites to ! /udy ( ,!ology4 ,,ii4 ,divisions ( ,!ology4 ,,iii4 ,hi/ory ( ,sy/ematic ,!ology4 ,,iv4 ,ord] ( ,treatm5t 9 ,sy/ematic ,!ology4 ,v4 ,text-,books 9 ,!ology4 ,"p ,,ii4 ,! ,exi/5ce ,( ,god4 ,*apt] ,i4 ,orig9 ,( ,our ,idea ,( ,god's ,exi/5ce4 ,i4 ,fir/ ,tru?s 9 ,g5]al4 ,,ii4 ,! ,exi/5ce ( ,god a fir/ tru?4 #a4 ,its univ]sality4 #b4 ,its necessity4 #c4 ,its logical indep5d5ce & priority4 ,,iii4 ,o!r ,suppos$ ,s\rces ( our ,idea ( ,god's ,exi/5ce4 ,,iv4 ,cont5ts ( ?is ,intuition4 ,*apt] ,,ii4 ,corroborative ,evid5ces ,( ,god's ,exi/5ce4 ,i4 ,! ,cosmological ,argum5t1 or ,argum5t f ,*ange 9 ,nature4 ,,ii4 ,! ,teleological ,argum5t1 or ,argum5t f ,ord] & ,useful ,collocation 9 ,nature4 ,,iii4 ,! ,an?ropological ,argum5t1 or ,argum5t f ,man's ,m5tal & ,moral ,nature4 ,,iv4 ,! ,ontological ,argum5t1 or ,argum5t f our ,ab/ract & ,necess>y ,ideas4 ,*apt] ,,iii4 ,errone\s ,explanations1 ,& ,conclusion4 ,i4 ,mat]ialism4 ,,ii4 ,mat]iali/ic ,idealism4 ,,iii4 ,ideali/ic ,pan!ism4 ,,iv4 ,e?ical ,monism4 ,"p ,,iii4 ,! ,scriptures ,a ,revelation ,f ,god4 ,*apt] ,i4 ,prelim9>y ,consid]ations4 ,i4 ,reasons a priori = expect+ a ,revelation f ,god4 ,,ii4 ,m>ks ( ! ,revelation man may expect4 ,,iii4 ,miracles1 z atte/+ a ,div9e ,revelation4 #a4 ,def9ition ( ,miracle4 #b4 ,possibility ( ,miracle4 #c4 ,probability ( ,miracles4 #d4 ,am\nt ( ,te/imony necess>y to prove a ,miracle4 #e4 ,evid5tial =ce ( ,miracles4 #f4 ,c\nt]feit ,miracles4 ,,iv4 ,prophecy z ,atte/+ a ,div9e ,revelation4 ,v4 ,pr9ciples ( ,hi/orical ,evid5ce applicable to ! ,pro( ( a ,div9e ,revelation4 #a4 ,z to docum5t>y evid5ce4 #b4 ,z to te/imony 9 g5]al4 ,*apt] ,,ii4 ,positive ,pro(s ,t ,! ,scriptures ,are ,a ,div9e ,revelation4 ,i4 ,g5u95ess ( ! ,*ri/ian ,docum5ts4 #a4 ,g5u95ess ( ! ,books ( ! ,new ,te/am5t4 #a/4 ,! ,my?-!ory ( ,/rauss 7#ahjh-ahgd74 #bnd4 ,! ,t5d5cy-!ory ( ,baur 7#agib-ahfj74 #c;d4 ,! ,romance-!ory ( ,r5an 7#ahbc-ahib74 #d?4 ,! ,developm5t-!ory ( ,h>nack 7born #ahea74 #b4 ,g5u95ess ( ! ,books ( ! ,old ,te/am5t4 ,,ii4 ,cr$ibility ( ! ,writ]s ( ! ,scriptures4 ,,iii4 ,! ,sup]natural ,"* ( ! ,scripture ,tea*+4 #a4 ,scripture tea*+ 9 g5]al4 #b4 ,moral ,sy/em ( ! ,new ,te/am5t4 #c4 ,! p]son & "* ( ,*ri/4 #d4 ,! te/imony ( ,*ri/ to himself--z be+ a mess5g] f ,god & z be+ "o ) ,god4 ,,iv4 ,! ,hi/orical ,results ( ! ,propagation ( ,scripture ,doctr9e4 ,*apt] ,,iii4 ,inspiration ,( ,! ,scriptures4 ,i4 ,def9ition ( ,inspiration4 ,,ii4 ,pro( ( ,inspiration4 ,,iii4 ,!ories ( ,inspiration4 #a4 ,! ,intuition-!ory4 #b4 ,! ,illum9ation ,!ory4 #c4 ,! ,dictation-!ory4 #d4 ,! ,dynamical ,!ory4 ,,iv4 ,! ,union ( ! ,div9e & ,human ,elem5ts 9 ,inspiration4 ,v4 ,objections to ! ,doctr9e ( ,inspiration4 #a4 ,errors 9 matt]s ( ,sci5ce4 #b4 ,errors 9 matt]s ( ,hi/ory4 #c4 ,errors 9 ,morality4 #d4 ,errors ( ,reason+4 #e4 ,errors 9 quot+ or int]pret+ ! ,old ,te/am5t4 #f4 ,errors 9 ,prophecy4 #g4 ,c]ta9 books unwor?y ( a place 9 inspir$ ,scripture4 #h4 ,portions ( ! ,scripture books writt5 by o!rs ?an ! p]sons to :om !y are ascrib$4 #i4 ,sceptical or fictiti\s ,n>ratives4 #aj4 ,ackn[l$gm5t ( ! non-inspiration ( ,scripture tea*]s & _! writ+s4 ,"p ,,iv4 ,! ,nature1 ,decrees1 ,& ,works ,( ,god4 ,*apt] ,i4 ,! ,attributes ,( ,god4 ,i4 ,def9ition ( ! t]m ,attributes4 ,,ii4 ,relation ( ! div9e ,attributes to ! div9e ,ess5ce4 ,,iii4 ,me?ods ( det]m9+ ! div9e ,attributes4 ,,iv4 ,classification ( ! ,attributes4 ,v4 ,absolute or ,imman5t ,attributes4 ,fir/ division4--,spirituality1 & attributes !re9 involv$4 #a4 ,life4 #b4 ,p]sonality4 ,second ,division4--,inf9ity1 & attributes !re9 involv$4 #a4 ,self-exi/5ce4 #b4 ,immutability4 #c4 ,unity4 ,?ird ,division4--,p]fection1 & attributes !re9 involv$4 #a4 ,tru?4 #b4 ,love4 #c4 ,hol9ess4 ,,vi4 ,relative or ,transitive ,attributes4 ,fir/ ,division4--,attributes hav+ relation to ,"t & ,space4 #a4 ,et]nity4 #b4 ,imm5sity4 ,second ,division4--,attributes hav+ relation to ,creation4 #a4 ,omnipres5ce4 #b4 ,omnisci5ce4 #c4 ,omnipot5ce4 ,?ird ,division4--,attributes hav+ relation to ,moral ,be+s4 #a4 ,v]acity & ,fai?fulness1 or ,transitive ,tru?4 #b4 ,m]cy & ,goodness1 or ,transitive ,love4 #c4 ,ju/ice & ,righte\sness1 or ,transitive ,hol9ess4 ,,vii4 ,rank & ,relations ( ! sev]al ,attributes4 #a4 ,hol9ess ! fundam5tal attribute 9 ,god4 #b4 ,! hol9ess ( ,god ! gr\nd ( moral obligation4 ,*apt] ,,ii4 ,doctr9e ,( ,! ,tr9ity4 ,i4 ,9 ,scriptures !re are ,?ree :o are recogniz$ z ,god4 #a4 ,pro(s f ! ,new ,te/am5t4 ,a4 ,! ,fa!r is recogniz$ z ,god4 ,b4 ,jesus ,*ri/ is recogniz$ z ,god4 ,c4 ,! ,holy ,_s is recogniz$ z ,god4 #b4 ,intimations ( ! ,old ,te/am5t4 ,a4 ,passages :i* seem to tea* plurality ( "s sort 9 ! ,godhead4 ,b4 ,passages relat+ to ! ,angel ( ,jehovah4 ,c4 ,descriptions ( ! div9e ,wisdom & ,^w4 ,d4 ,descriptions ( ! ,messiah4 ,,ii4 ,^! ,?ree are s describ$ 9 ,scripture t we are compell$ to conceive ( !m z di/9ct ,p]sons4 #a4 ,! ,fa!r & ! ,son are p]sons di/9ct f ea* o!r4 #b4 ,! ,fa!r & ! ,son are p]sons di/9ct f ! ,_s4 #c4 ,! ,holy ,_s is a p]son4 ,,iii4 ,?is ,trip]sonality ( ! ,div9e ,nature is n m]ely economic & temporal1 b is imman5t & et]nal4 #a4 ,scripture pro( t ^! di/9ctions ( p]sonality are et]nal4 #b4 ,errors refut$ by ! =ego+ passages4 ,a4 ,! ,sabellian4 ,b4 ,! ,arian4 ,,iv4 ,?is ,trip]sonality is n ,tri!ism2 =1 :ile !re are ?ree ,p]sons1 !re is b "o ,ess5ce4 ,v4 ,! ,?ree ,p]sons1 ,fa!r1 ,son1 & ,holy ,_s1 are equal4 #a4 ,^! titles belong to ! ,p]sons4 #b4 ,qualifi$ s5se ( ^! titles4 #c4 ,g5]ation & procession consi/5t ) equality4 ,,vi4 ,inscrutable1 yet n self-contradictory1 ?is ,doctr9e furni%es ! ,key to all o!r ,doctr9es4 #a4 ,! mode ( ?is triune exi/5ce is inscrutable4 #b4 ,! ,doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity is n self-contradictory4 #c4 ,! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity has important relations to o!r doctr9es4 ,*apt] ,,iii4 ,! ,decrees ,( ,god4 ,i4 ,def9ition ( ,decrees4 ,,ii4 ,pro( ( ! ,doctr9e ( ,decrees4 #a4 ,f ,scripture4 #b4 ,f ,reason4 ,a4 ,f ! ,div9e ,=ekn[l$ge4 ,b4 ,f ! ,div9e ,wisdom4 ,c4 ,f ! ,div9e ,immutability4 ,d4 ,f ! ,div9e ,b5evol5ce4 ,,iii4 ,objections to ! ,doctr9e ( ,decrees4 #a4 ,t !y are inconsi/5t ) ! free ag5cy ( man4 #b4 ,t !y take away all motive = human ex]tion4 #c4 ,t !y make ,god ! au?or ( s94 ,,iv4 ,conclud+ ,rem>ks4 #a4 ,practical uses ( ! doctr9e ( decrees4 #b4 ,true me?od ( prea*+ ! doctr9e4 ,cov] ,art ,transcrib]'s ,note3 ,! above cov] image 0 produc$ by ! submitt] at ,di/ribut$ ,pro(read]s1 & is be+ plac$ into ! public doma94 ,*ri/o ,deo ,salvatori4 8,,! ,,eye ,,sees ,,only ,,t ,,:i* ,,x ,,br+s ,,) ,,x ,,! ,,p[] ,,( ,,see+40--,cic]o4 8,,op5 ,,?\ ,,m9e ,,eyes1 ,,t ,i ,,may ,,behold ,,wondr\s ,,?+s ,,out ,,( ,,?y ,,law40--,psalm #aai3ah4 8,,= ,,) ,,!e ,,is ,,! ,,f\nta9 ,,( ,,life3 ,,9 ,,?y ,,light ,,%all ,,we ,,see ,,light40--,psalm #cf3i4 8,,= ,,we ,,"k ,,9 ,,"p1 ,,& ,,we ,,prophesy ,,9 ,,"p2 ,,b ,,:5 ,,t ,,:i* ,,is ,,p]fect ,,is ,,come1 ,,t ,,:i* ,,is ,,9 ,,"p ,,%all ,,be ,,done ,,away40--#a ,cor4 #ac3i1 #aj4 ,,preface ,! pres5t "w is a revision & enl>gem5t ( my 8,sy/ematic ,!ology10 fir/ publi%$ 9 #ahhf4 ,( ! orig9al "w !re h be5 pr9t$ sev5 editions1 ea* edition embody+ successive corrections & suppos$ improvem5ts4 ,dur+ ! tw5ty ye>s :i* h int]v5$ s9ce its fir/ publication ,i h accumulat$ mu* new mat]ial1 :i* ,i n[ (f] to ! read]4 ,my philosophical & critical po9t ( view meantime has also some:at *ang$4 ,:ile ,i /ill hold to ! old doctr9es1 ,i int]pret !m diff]5tly & exp\nd !m m cle>ly1 because ,i seem to myself to h rea*$ a fundam5tal tru? :i* ?r[s new light ^u !m all4 ,?is tru? ,i h tri$ to set =? 9 my book entitl$ 8,*ri/ 9 ,creation10 & to t book ,i ref] ! read] = fur!r in=mation4 ,t ,*ri/ is ! "o & only ,reveal] ( ,god1 9 nature1 9 humanity1 9 hi/ory1 9 sci5ce1 9 ,scripture1 is 9 my judgm5t ! key to !ology4 ,?is view implies a moni/ic & ideali/ic conception ( ! _w1 toge!r ) an evolution>y idea z to its orig9 & progress4 ,b x is ! v antidote to pan!ism1 9 t x recognizes evolution z only ! me?od ( ! transc5d5t & p]sonal ,*ri/1 :o fills all 9 all1 & :o makes ! univ]se teleological & moral f its c5tre to its circumf]5ce & f its beg9n+ until n[4 ,nei!r evolution nor ! high] criticism has any t]rors to "o :o reg>ds !m z p>ts ( ,*ri/'s creat+ & educat+ process4 ,! ,*ri/ 9 :om are hid all ! treasures ( wisdom & k himself furni%es all ! ne$$ safegu>ds & limitations4 ,x is only because ,*ri/ has be5 =gott5 t nature & law h be5 p]sonifi$1 t hi/ory has be5 reg>d$ z unpurpos$ developm5t1 t ,judaism has be5 ref]r$ to a m]ely human orig91 t ,paul has be5 ?\ght to h swit*$ ! *ur* (f f its prop] track ev5 be=e x _h gott5 fairly />t$ on its c\rse1 t sup]/ition & illusion h come to seem ! only f\ndation = ! sacrifices ( ! m>tyrs & ! triumphs ( mod]n missions4 ,i believe 9 no su* irrational & a!i/ic evolution z ?is4 ,i believe r 9 him 9 :om all ?+s consi/1 :o is ) 8 p ev5 to ! end ( ! _w1 & :o has promis$ to lead !m into all ! tru?4 ,philosophy & sci5ce are good s]vants ( ,*ri/1 b !y are poor guides :5 !y rule out ! ,son ( ,god4 ,z ,i rea* my sev5tie? ye> & write ^! words on my bir?day1 ,i am ?ankful = t p]sonal exp]i5ce ( union ) ,*ri/ :i* has enabl$ me to see 9 sci5ce & philosophy ! tea*+ ( my ,"l4 ,b ?is same p]sonal exp]i5ce has made me ev5 m alive to ,*ri/'s tea*+ 9 ,scripture1 has made me recognize 9 ,paul & ,john a tru? pr(\nd] ?an t disclos$ by any secul> writ]s1 tru? ) reg>d to s9 & atonem5t = s91 t satisfies ! deepe/ wants ( my nature & t is self-evid5c+ & div9e4 ,i am di/ress$ by "s common !ological t5d5cies ( our "t1 because ,i believe !m to be false to bo? sci5ce & religion4 ,h[ m5 :o h ev] felt !mselves to be lo/ s9n]s & :o h once receiv$ p>don f _! crucifi$ ,"l & ,savior c !reaft] seek to p>e d[n 8 attributes1 d5y 8 deity & atonem5t1 te> f 8 br[ ! cr[n ( miracle & sov]eignty1 relegate him to ! place ( a m]ely moral tea*] :o influ5ces u only z does ,socrates by words spok5 across a /ret* ( ages1 passes my compreh5sion4 ,"h is my te/ ( or?odoxy3 ,d we pray to ,jesus8 ,d we call ^u ! "n ( ,*ri/1 z did ,/eph5 & all ! e>ly *ur*8 ,is he our liv+ ,"l1 omnipres5t1 omnisci5t1 omnipot5t8 ,is he div9e only 9 ! s5se 9 :i* we are div9e1 or is he ! only-begott5 ,son1 ,god manife/ 9 ! fle%1 9 :om is all ! fulness ( ! ,godhead bodily8 ,:at ?9k ye ( ! ,*ri/8 is /ill ! critical "q1 & none are entitl$ to ! "n ( ,*ri/ian :o1 9 ! face ( ! evid5ce he has furni%$ u1 _c answ] ! "q aright4 ,"u ! influ5ce ( ,rits*l & 8 ,kantian relativism1 _m ( our tea*]s & prea*]s h swung (f into a practical d5ial ( ,*ri/'s deity & ( 8 atonem5t4 ,we seem ^u ! v]ge ( a second ,unit>ian defection1 t w break up *ur*es & compel secessions1 9 a worse mann] ?an did t ( ,*ann+ & ,w>e a c5tury ago4 ,am]ican ,*ri/ianity recov]$ f t disa/] only by vigor\sly ass]t+ ! au?ority ( ,*ri/ & ! inspiration ( ! ,scriptures4 ,we ne$ a new vision ( ! ,savior l t :i* ,paul saw on ! way to ,damascus & ,john saw on ! isle ( ,patmos1 to conv9ce u t ,jesus is lift$ above space & "t1 t 8 exi/5ce ant$at$ creation1 t he conduct$ ! m>* ( ,hebrew hi/ory1 t he 0 born ( a virg91 suff]$ on ! cross1 rose f ! dead1 & n[ lives =ev]more1 ! ,"l ( ! univ]se1 ! only ,god ) :om we h to d1 our ,savior "h & our ,judge h]eaft]4 ,)\t a revival ( ?is fai? our *ur*es w become secul>iz$1 mission ent]prise w die out1 & ! c&le/ick w be remov$ out ( its place z x 0 ) ! sev5 *ur*es ( ,asia1 & z x has be5 ) ! apo/ate *ur*es ( ,new ,engl&4 ,i pr9t ?is revis$ & enl>g$ edition ( my 8,sy/ematic ,!ology10 9 ! hope t its publication may d some?+ to /em ?is fa/ advanc+ tide1 & to confirm ! fai? ( ,god's elect4 ,i make no d\bt t ! va/ majority ( ,*ri/ians /ill hold ! fai? t 0 once = all deliv]$ to ! sa9ts1 & t !y w soon] or lat] sep>ate !mselves f ^? :o d5y ! ,"l :o b\ght !m4 ,:5 ! enemy comes 9 l a flood1 ! ,_s ( ! ,"l w raise up a /&>d aga9/ him4 ,i w\ld d my "p 9 rais+ up su* a /&>d4 ,i w\ld lead o!rs to av[ anew1 z ,i d n[1 9 spite ( ! sup]cili\s assumptions ( mod]n infidelity1 my firm belief1 only confirm$ by ! exp]i5ce & reflection ( a half-c5tury1 9 ! old doctr9es ( hol9ess z ! fundam5tal attribute ( ,god1 ( an orig9al transgression & s9 ( ! :ole human race1 9 a div9e prep>ation 9 ,hebrew hi/ory = man's r$emption1 9 ! deity1 prexi/5ce1 virg9 bir?1 vic>i\s atonem5t & bodily resurrection ( ,jesus ,*ri/ our ,"l1 & 9 8 future com+ to judge ! quick & ! dead4 ,i believe t ^! are tru?s ( sci5ce z well z tru?s ( revelation2 t ! sup]natural w yet be se5 to be mo/ truly natural2 & t n ! op5-m9d$ !ologian b ! n>r[-m9d$ sci5ti/ w be oblig$ to hide 8 head at ,*ri/'s com+4 ,! pres5t volume1 9 its treatm5t ( ,e?ical ,monism1 ,inspiration1 ! ,attributes ( ,god1 & ! ,tr9ity1 conta9s an antidote to mo/ ( ! false doctr9e :i* n[ ?reat5s ! safety ( ! *ur*4 ,i desire especially to call att5tion to ! section on ,p]fection1 & ! ,attributes !re9 involv$1 because ,i believe t ! rec5t m]g+ ( ,hol9ess 9 ,love1 & ! practical d5ial t ,righte\sness is fundam5tal 9 ,god's nature1 are responsible = ! utilit>ian views ( law & ! sup]ficial views ( s9 :i* n[ prevail 9 "s sy/ems ( !ology4 ,!re c be no prop] doctr9e ( ! atonem5t & no prop] doctr9e ( retribution1 s long z ,hol9ess is refus$ its prem95ce4 ,love mu/ h a norm or /&>d1 & ?is norm or /&>d c be f\nd only 9 ,hol9ess4 ,! old conviction ( s9 & ! s5se ( guilt t drove ! convict$ s9n] to ! cross are insep>able f a firm belief 9 ! self-affirm+ attribute ( ,god z logically prior to & z condition+ ! self-communicat+ attribute4 ,! !ology ( our day ne$s a new view ( ! ,righte\s ,"o4 ,su* a view w make x pla9 t ,god mu/ be reconcil$ be=e man c be sav$1 & t ! human consci5ce c be pacifi$ only ^u condition t propitiation is made to ! div9e ,righte\sness4 ,9 ?is volume ,i prop\nd :at ,i reg>d z ! true ,doctr9e ( ,god1 because ^u x w be bas$ all t foll[s 9 ! volumes on ! ,doctr9e ( ,man1 & ! ,doctr9e ( ,salvation4 ,! univ]sal pres5ce ( ,*ri/1 ! ,light t lighte? e man1 9 hea!n z well z 9 ,*ri/ian l&s1 to direct or ov]rule all movem5ts ( ! human m9d1 gives me confid5ce t ! rec5t attacks ^u ! ,*ri/ian fai? w fail ( _! purpose4 ,x becomes evid5t at la/ t n only ! outworks are assault$1 b ! v citadel itself4 ,we are ask$ to give up all belief 9 special revelation4 ,jesus ,*ri/1 x is said1 has come 9 ! fle% precisely z ea* "o ( u has come1 & he 0 be=e ,abraham only 9 ! same s5se t we 74 ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce kn[s h[ to *>act]ize su* doctr9e s soon z x is cle>ly /at$4 ,& ! new !ology w be ( use 9 enabl+ ev5 ord9>y believ]s to recognize s\l-de/roy+ h]esy ev5 "u ! mask ( pr(ess$ or?odoxy4 ,i make no apology = ! homiletical elem5t 9 my book4 ,to be ei!r true or useful1 !ology mu/ be a passion4 ,pectus e/ quod !ologum facit1 & no disda9ful cries ( 8,pectoral ,!ology60 %all prev5t me f ma9ta9+ t ! eyes ( ! he>t mu/ be enlight5$ 9 ord] to p]ceive ! tru? ( ,god1 & t to "k ! tru? x is ne$ful to d ! tru?4 ,!ology is a sci5ce :i* c be successfully cultivat$ only 9 connection ) its practical application4 ,i w\ld !re=e1 9 e discussion ( its pr9ciples1 po9t out its relations to ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce1 & its p[] to awak5 ,*ri/ian emotions & lead to ,*ri/ian decisions4 ,ab/ract !ology is n really sci5tific4 ,only t !ology is sci5tific :i* br+s ! /ud5t to ! feet ( ,*ri/4 ,i w\ld ha/5 ! day :5 9 ! "n ( ,jesus e knee %all b[4 ,i believe t1 if any man s]ve ,*ri/1 him ! ,fa!r w honor1 & t to s]ve ,*ri/ means to honor him z ,i honor ! ,fa!r4 ,i w\ld n pride myself t ,i believe s little1 b r t ,i believe s mu*4 ,fai? is ,god's measure ( a man4 ,:y %\ld ,i d\bt t ,god spoke to ! fa!rs ?r\gh ! prophets8 ,:y %\ld ,i ?9k x incr$ible t ,god %\ld raise ! dead8 ,! ?+s t are impossible ) m5 are possible ) ,god4 ,:5 ! ,son ( man comes1 %all he f9d fai? on ! e>?8 ,let him at lea/ f9d fai? 9 u :o pr(ess to be 8 foll[]s4 ,9 ! conviction t ! pres5t d>kness is b tempor>y & t x w be bani%$ by a glori\s sunris+1 ,i give ?is new edition ( my 8,!ology0 to ! public ) ! pray] t :atev] ( good se$ is 9 x may br+ =? fruit1 & t :atev] plant ! heav5ly ,fa!r has n plant$ may be root$ up4 ,,ro*e/] ,,!ological ,,sem9>y1 ,,ro*e/]1 ,n4 ,y41 ,,augu/ #c1 #aijf4 ,,"p ,i4 ,,prolegom5a4 ,*apt] ,i4 ,idea ,( ,!ology4 ,i4 ,def9ition ( ,!ology4 ,!ology is ! sci5ce ( ,god & ( ! relations betwe5 ,god & ! univ]se4 ,?\gh ! ^w 8!ology0 is sometimes employ$ 9 dogmatic writ+s to designate t s+le dep>tm5t ( ! sci5ce :i* treats ( ! div9e nature & attributes1 prevail+ usage1 s9ce ,abel>d 7,a4 ,d4 #ajgi-aadb7 entitl$ 8 g5]al treatise 8,!ologia ,*ri/iana10 has includ$ "u t t]m ! :ole range ( ,*ri/ian doctr9e4 ,!ology1 !re=e1 gives acc\nt1 n only ( ,god1 b ( ^? relations betwe5 ,god & ! univ]se 9 view ( :i* we speak ( ,creation1 ,provid5ce & ,r$emption4 ,john ! ,evangeli/ is call$ by ! ,fa!rs 8! !ologian10 because he mo/ fully treats ( ! int]nal relations ( ! p]sons ( ! ,tr9ity4 ,gregory ,nazianz5 7#cbh7 receiv$ ?is designation because he def5d$ ! deity ( ,*ri/ aga9/ ! ,arians4 ,= a mod]n in/ance ( ?is use ( ! t]m 8!ology0 9 ! n>r[ s5se1 see ! title ( ,dr4 ,hodge's fir/ volume3 8,sy/ematic ,!ology1 ,vol4 ,i3 ,!ology40 ,b !ology is n simply 8! sci5ce ( ,god10 nor ev5 8! sci5ce ( ,god & man40 ,x also gives acc\nt ( ! relations betwe5 ,god & ! univ]se4 ,if ! univ]se 7 ,god1 !ology w\ld be ! only sci5ce4 ,s9ce ! univ]se is b a manife/ation ( ,god & is di/9ct f ,god1 !re are sci5ces ( nature & ( m9d4 ,!ology is 8! sci5ce ( ! sci5ces10 n 9 ! s5se ( includ+ all ^! sci5ces1 b 9 ! s5se ( us+ _! results & ( %[+ _! und]ly+ gr\nd2 7see ,w>dlaw1 ,!ology1 #a3a1 #b74 ,physical sci5ce is n a "p ( !ology4 ,z a m]e physici/1 ,humboldt did n ne$ to m5tion ! "n ( ,god 9 8 8,cosmos0 7b see ,cosmos1 #b3dah1 :]e ,humboldt says3 8,psalm #ajd pres5ts an image ( ! :ole ,cosmos074 ,bi%op ( ,c>lisle3 8,sci5ce is a!\s1 & !re=e _c be a!i/ic40 ,only :5 we consid] ! relations ( f9ite ?+s to ,god1 does ! /udy ( !m furni% mat]ial = !ology4 ,an?ropology is a "p ( !ology1 because man's nature is ! "w ( ,god & because ,god's deal+s ) man ?r[ light ^u ! "* ( ,god4 ,god is kn[n ?r\gh 8 works & 8 activities4 ,!ology !re=e gives acc\nt ( ^! works & activities s f> z !y come )9 our k4 ,all o!r sci5ces require !ology = _! complete explanation4 ,pr\dhon3 8,if y g v deeply into politics1 y are sure to get into !ology40 ,on ! def9ition ( !ology1 see ,lu?>dt1 ,comp5dium d] ,dogmatik1 #a3b2 ,blunt1 ,dict4 ,doct4 & ,hi/4 ,!ol41 art43 ,!ology2 ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 ,introd4 to ,*ri/4 ,!ol41 #dd2 cf4 ,ari/otle1 ,metaph41 #aj1 #g1 #d2 #aa1 #f1 #d2 & ,lactantius1 ,de ,ira ,dei1 #aa4 ,,ii4 ,aim ( ,!ology4 ,! aim ( !ology is ! asc]ta9m5t ( ! facts respect+ ,god & ! relations betwe5 ,god & ! univ]se1 & ! exhibition ( ^! facts 9 _! rational unity1 z connect$ p>ts ( a =mulat$ & organic sy/em ( tru?4 ,9 def9+ !ology z a sci5ce1 we indicate its aim4 ,sci5ce does n create2 x discov]s4 ,!ology answ]s to ?is description ( a sci5ce4 ,x discov]s facts & relations1 b x does n create !m4 ,fi%]1 ,nature & ,me?od ( ,revelation1 #ada--8,s*ill]1 ref]r+ to ! ardor ( ,columbus's fai?1 says t if ! great discov]] _h n f\nd a cont95t1 he w\ld h creat$ "o4 ,b fai? is n creative4 ,_h ,columbus n f\nd ! l&--_h !re be5 no real object answ]+ to 8 belief--8 fai? w\ld h be5 a m]e fancy40 ,because !ology deals ) objective facts1 we refuse to def9e x z 8! sci5ce ( religion02 v]sus ,am4 ,!ol4 ,rev41 #ahej3aja-abf1 & ,?ornwell1 ,!ology1 #a3aci4 ,bo? ! facts & ! relations ) :i* !ology has to deal h an exi/5ce indep5d5t ( ! subjective m5tal processes ( ! !ologian4 ,sci5ce is n only ! obs]v+1 record+1 v]ify+1 & =mulat+ ( objective facts2 x is also ! recognition & explication ( ! relations betwe5 ^! facts1 & ! syn!sis ( bo? ! facts & ! rational pr9ciples :i* unite !m 9 a compreh5sive1 rightly proportion$1 & organic sy/em4 ,scatt]$ bricks & timb]s are n a h\se2 sev]$ arms1 legs1 heads & trunks f a dissect+ room are n liv+ m52 & facts alone d n con/itute sci5ce4 ,sci5ce facts relations2 ,:ewell1 ,hi/4 ,inductive ,sci5ces1 ,i1 ,introd41 #dc--8,!re may be facts )\t sci5ce1 z 9 ! k ( ! common qu>ryman2 !re may be ?\ght )\t sci5ce1 z 9 ! e>ly ,greek philosophy40 ,a4 ,mac,donald3 8,! a priori me?od is relat$ to ! a po/]iori z ! sails to ! balla/ ( ! boat3 ! m philosophy ! bett]1 provid$ !re are a suffici5t numb] ( facts2 o!rwise1 !re is dang] ( upsett+ ! craft40 ,presid5t ,woodr[ ,wilson3 8 #8,give u ! facts' is ! %>p injunction ( our age to its hi/orians 444 ,b facts ( !mselves d n con/itute ! tru?4 ,! tru? is ab/ract1 n concrete4 ,x is ! j idea1 ! "r revelation1 ( :at ?+s mean4 ,x is evok$ only by su* arrangem5ts & ord]+s ( facts z sugge/ mean+s40 ,dove1 ,logic ( ! ,*ri/ian ,fai?1 #ad--8,! pursuit ( sci5ce is ! pursuit ( relations40 ,ev]ett1 ,sci5ce ( ,?\ght1 #c--8,logy0 7e4 g41 9 8!ology071 f 1 ^w reason1 expression ?\ght1 fact idea2 cf4 ,john #a3a--8;,9 ! beg9n+ 0 ! ,^w40 ,z !ology deals ) objective facts & _! relations1 s its arrangem5t ( ^! facts is n optional1 b is det]m9$ by ! nature ( ! mat]ial ) :i* x deals4 ,a true !ology ?9ks ov] aga9 ,god's ?\ghts & br+s !m into ,god's ord]1 z ! build]s ( ,solomon's temple took ! /ones already hewn1 & put !m into ! places = :i* ! ar*itect _h design$ !m2 ,reg9ald ,heb]3 8,no hamm] fell1 no pond]\s axes rung2 ,l "s tall palm1 ! my/ic fabric sprung40 ,sci5tific m5 h no fe> t ! data ( physics w n>r[ or cramp _! intellects2 no m %\ld !y fe> ! objective facts :i* are ! data ( !ology4 ,we _c make !ology1 any m ?an we c make a law ( physical nature4 ,z ! natural philosoph] is 8,natur m9i/] et int]pres10 s ! !ologian is ! s]vant & int]pret] ( ! objective tru? ( ,god4 ,on ! ,idea ( ,!ology z a ,sy/em1 see ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 ,fai? & ,philosophy1 #abf-aff4 ,,iii4 ,possibility ( ,!ology4 ,! possibility ( !ology has a ?reefold gr\nd3 #a4 ,9 ! exi/5ce ( a ,god :o has relations to ! univ]se2 #b4 ,9 ! capacity ( ! human m9d = kn[+ ,god & c]ta9 ( ^! relations2 & #c4 ,9 ! provision ( means by :i* ,god is br\ght into actual contact ) ! m9d1 or 9 o!r words1 9 ! provision ( a revelation4 ,any p>ticul> sci5ce is possible only :5 ?ree conditions comb9e1 namely1 ! actual exi/5ce ( ! object ) :i* ! sci5ce deals1 ! subjective capacity ( ! human m9d to "k t object1 & ! provision ( def9ite means by :i* ! object is br\ght into contact ) ! m9d4 ,we may illu/rate ! conditions ( !ology f sel5ology--! sci5ce1 n ( 8lun> politics10 :i* ,john ,/u>t ,mill ?\ght s va9 a pursuit1 b ( lun> physics4 ,sel5ology has ?ree conditions3 #a4 ! objective exi/5ce ( ! moon2 #b4 ! subjective capacity ( ! human m9d to "k ! moon2 & #c4 ! provision ( "s means 7e4 g41 ! eye & ! telescope7 by :i* ! gulf betwe5 man & ! moon is bridg$ ov]1 & by :i* ! m9d c come into actual cognizance ( ! facts ) reg>d to ! moon4 #a4 ,! exi/5ce ( a ,god4 ,9 ! exi/5ce ( a ,god :o has relations to ! univ]se4--,x has be5 object$1 inde$1 t s9ce ,god & ^! relations are objects appreh5d$ only by fai?1 !y are n prop] objects ( k or subjects = sci5ce4 ,we reply3 ,a4 ,fai? is k1 & a high] sort ( k4--,physical sci5ce also re/s ^u fai?--fai? 9 our own exi/5ce1 9 ! exi/5ce ( a _w objective & ext]nal to u1 & 9 ! exi/5ce ( o!r p]sons ?an ourselves2 fai? 9 our primitive convictions1 su* z space1 "t1 cause1 sub/ance1 design1 "r2 fai? 9 ! tru/wor?9ess ( our faculties & 9 ! te/imony ( our fell[ m54 ,b physical sci5ce is n !reby invalidat$1 because ?is fai?1 ?\gh unlike s5se-p]ception or logical demon/ration1 is yet a cognitive act ( ! reason1 & may be def9$ z c]titude ) respect to matt]s 9 :i* v]ification is unatta9able4 ,! objection to !ology ?us m5tion$ & answ]$ is express$ 9 ! words ( ,sir ,william ,hamilton1 ,metaphysics1 #dd1 #eca--8;,fai?--belief--is ! organ by :i* we appreh5d :at is beyond our k40 ,b sci5ce is k1 & :at is beyond our k _c be matt] = sci5ce4 ,pres4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son says well1 t k & fai? _c be sev]$ f "o ano!r1 l bulkheads 9 a %ip1 ! fir/ ( :i* may be cru%$ 91 :ile ! second /ill keeps ! vessel afloat4 ,! m9d is "o1--8x _c be cut 9 two ) a hat*et40 ,fai? is n anti!tical to k1--x is r a l>g] & m fundam5tal sort ( k4 ,x is nev] oppos$ to reason1 b only to sight4 ,t5nyson 0 wrong :5 he wrote3 8,we h b fai?3 we _c "k2 ,= k is ( ?+s we see0 7,9 ,memoriam1 ,introduction74 ,?is w\ld make s5su\s ph5om5a ! only objects ( k4 ,fai? 9 sup]s5sible realities1 on ! contr>y1 is ! highe/ ex]cise ( reason4 ,sir ,william ,hamilton consi/5tly decl>es t ! highe/ a*ievem5t ( sci5ce is ! erection ( an alt> 8,to ! ,unkn[n ,god40 ,?is1 h[ev]1 is n ! repres5tation ( ,scripture4 ,cf4 ,john #ag3c--8?is is life et]nal1 t !y %\ld "k !e1 ! only true ,god02 & ,j]4 #i3bd--8let him t glorie? glory 9 t he ha? und]/&+ & kn[e? me40 ,= criticism ( ,hamilton1 see ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 ,fai? & ,philosophy1 #big-ccf4 ,fi*te3 8,we are born 9 fai?40 ,ev5 ,goe! call$ himself a believ] 9 ! five s5ses4 ,balf\r1 ,def5ce ( ,philosophic ,d\bt1 #bgg-bie1 %[s t intuitive beliefs 9 space1 "t1 cause1 sub/ance1 "r1 are presuppos$ 9 ! acquisition ( all o!r k4 ,dove1 ,logic ( ! ,*ri/ian ,fai?1 #ad--8;,if !ology is to be ov]?r[n because x />ts f "s prim>y t]ms & propositions1 !n all o!r sci5ces are ov]?r[n ) x40 ,mozley1 ,miracles1 def9es fai? z 8unv]ifi$ reason40 ,see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,philosophy & ,religion1 #ai-cj4 ,b4 ,fai? is a k condition$ by holy affection4--,! fai? :i* appreh5ds ,god's be+ & work+ is n op9ion or imag9ation4 ,x is c]titude ) reg>d to spiritual realities1 ^u ! te/imony ( our rational nature & ^u ! te/imony ( ,god4 ,its only peculi>ity z a cognitive act ( ! reason is t x is condition$ by holy affection4 ,z ! sci5ce ( /hetics is a product ( reason z includ+ a p[] ( recogniz+ beauty practically insep>able f a love = beauty1 & z ! sci5ce ( e?ics is a product ( reason z includ+ a p[] ( recogniz+ ! morally "r practically insep>able f a love = ! morally "r1 s ! sci5ce ( !ology is a product ( reason1 b ( reason z includ+ a p[] ( recogniz+ ,god :i* is practically insep>able f a love = ,god4 ,we "h use ! t]m 8reason0 to signify ! m9d's :ole p[] ( kn[+4 ,reason 9 ?is s5se includes /ates ( ! s5sibility1 s f> z !y are indisp5sable to k4 ,we _c "k an orange by ! eye alone2 to ! und]/&+ ( x1 ta/e is z necess>y z sight4 ,! ma!matics ( s\nd _c give u an und]/&+ ( music2 we ne$ also a musical e>4 ,logic alone _c demon/rate ! beauty ( a sunset1 or ( a noble "*2 love = ! beautiful & ! "r prec$es k ( ! beautiful & ! "r4 ,ullman draws att5tion to ! d]ivation ( sapi5tia1 wisdom1 f sapre1 to ta/e4 ,s we _c "k ,god by intellect alone2 ! he>t mu/ g ) ! intellect to make k ( div9e ?+s possible4 8,human ?+s10 said ,pascal1 8ne$ only to be kn[n1 9 ord] to be lov$2 b div9e ?+s mu/ fir/ be lov$1 9 ord] to be kn[n40 8,?is religi\s fai? ( ! intellect10 said ,kant1 8is f\nd$ on ! assumption ( moral temp]s40 ,if "o 7 utt]ly indiff]5t to moral laws1 ! philosoph] cont9ues1 ev5 !n religi\s tru?s 8w\ld be support$ by /rong argum5ts f analogy1 b n by su* z an ob/9ate1 sceptical he>t might n ov]come40 ,fai?1 !n1 is ! highe/ k1 because x is ! act ( ! integral s\l1 ! insight1 n ( "o eye alone1 b ( ! two eyes ( ! m9d1 intellect & love to ,god4 ,) "o eye we c see an object z flat1 b1 if we wi% to see ar\nd x & get ! /]eoptic effect1 we mu/ use bo? eyes4 ,x is n ! !ologian1 b ! undev\t a/ronom]1 ^: sci5ce is "o-ey$ & !re=e incomplete4 ,! errors ( ! rationali/ are errors ( defective vision4 ,intellect has be5 divorc$ f he>t1 t is1 f a "r disposition1 "r affections1 "r purpose 9 life4 ,intellect says3 8,i _c "k ,god02 & intellect is "r4 ,:at intellect says1 ! ,scripture also says3 #a ,cor4 #b3ad--8! natural man receive? n ! ?+s ( ! ,_s ( ,god3 = !y are fooli%ness unto him2 & he _c "k !m1 because !y are spiritually judg$02 #a3ba--8;9 ! wisdom ( ,god ! _w ?r\gh its wisdom knew n ,god40 ,! ,scripture on ! o!r h& decl>es t 8by fai? we "k0 7,heb4 #aa3c74 ,by 8he>t0 ! ,scripture means simply ! gov]n+ disposition1 or ! s5sibility ! w2 & x intimates t ! he>t is an organ ( k3 ,ex4 #ce3be--8! wom5 t 7 wise-he>t$02 ,ps4 #cd3h--8,o ta/e & see t ,jehovah is good0 a "r ta/e prec$es correct sight2 ,j]4 #bd3g--8;,i w give !m a he>t to "k me02 ,mat4 #e3h--8;,bless$ are ! pure 9 he>t2 = !y %all see ,god02 ,luke #bd3be--8sl[ ( he>t to believe02 ,john #g3ag--8;,if any man wille? to d 8 w1 he %all "k ( ! tea*+1 :e!r x is ( ,god1 or :e!r ,i speak f myself02 ,eph4 #a3ah--8;hav+ ! eyes ( y\r he>t enlight5$1 t ye may "k02 #a ,john #d3g1 #h--8;,e "o t love? is begott5 ( ,god1 & kn[e? ,god4 ,he t love? n kn[e? n ,god40 ,see ,frank1 ,*ri/ian ,c]ta9ty1 #cjc-cbd2 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/4 ,!ol41 #cfb2 ,ill+wor?1 ,div4 & ,hum4 ,p]sonality1 #aad-acg2 ,r4 ,t4 ,smi?1 ,man's ,k ( ,man & ( ,god1 #f2 ,fi%]1 ,nat4 & ,me?od ( ,rev41 #f2 ,william ,james1 ,! ,w to ,believe1 #a-ca2 ,geo4 ,t4 ,ladd1 on ,lotze's view t love is ess5tial to ! k ( ,god1 9 ,new ,_w1 ,sept4 #ahie3dja-djf2 ,gunsaulus1 ,transfig4 ( ,*ri/1 #ad1 #ae4 ,c4 ,fai?1 !re=e1 c furni%1 & only fai? c furni%1 fit & suffici5t mat]ial = a sci5tific !ology4--,z an op]ation ( man's high] rational nature1 ?\gh di/9ct f ocul> vision or f reason+1 fai? is n only a k9d1 b ! highe/ k9d1 ( kn[+4 ,x gives u und]/&+ ( realities :i* to s5se alone are inaccessible1 namely1 ,god's exi/5ce1 & "s at lea/ ( ! relations betwe5 ,god & 8 creation4 ,philippi1 ,glaub5slehre1 #a3ej1 foll[s ,g]h>d 9 mak+ fai? ! jo9t act ( intellect & w4 ,hopk9s1 ,outl9e ,/udy ( ,man1 #gg1 #gh1 speaks n only ( 8! /hetic reason0 b ( 8! moral reason40 ,murphy1 ,sci5tific ,bases ( ,fai?1 #ia1 #aji1 #ade1 #aia--8;,fai? is ! c]titude conc]n+ matt] 9 :i* v]ification is unatta9able40 ,em]son1 ,essays1 #b3if--8;,belief consi/s 9 accept+ ! affirmations ( ! s\l--unbelief 9 reject+ !m40 ,morell1 ,philos4 ( ,religion1 #ch1 #eb1 #ec1 quotes ,col]idge3 8,fai? consi/s 9 ! syn!sis ( ! reason & ( ! individual w1 444 & by virtue ( ! =m] 7t is1 reason71 fai? mu/ be a light1 a =m ( kn[+1 a behold+ ( tru?40 ,fai?1 !n1 is n to be pictur$ z a bl9d girl cl++ to a cross--fai? is n bl9d--8,else ! cross may j z well be a crucifix or an image ( ,gaudama40 8,bl9d unbelief10 n bl9d fai?1 8is sure to err1 ,& scan 8 works 9 va940 ,z 9 consci5ce we recognize an invisible au?ority1 & "k ! tru? j 9 proportion to our will+ness to 8d ! tru?10 s 9 religion only hol9ess c und]/& hol9ess1 & only love c und]/& love 7cf4 ,john #c3ba--8;he t doe? ! tru? come? to ! light074 ,if a "r /ate ( he>t be indisp5sable to fai? & s to ! k ( ,god1 c !re be any 8!ologia irreg5itorum10 or !ology ( ! unreg5]ate8 ,yes1 we answ]2 j z ! bl9d man c h a sci5ce ( optics4 ,! te/imony ( o!rs gives x claims ^u him2 ! dim light p5etrat+ ! obscur+ membrane corroborates ?is te/imony4 ,! unreg5]ate man c "k ,god z p[] & ju/ice1 & c fe> him4 ,b ?is is n a k ( ,god's inmo/ "*2 x furni%es "s mat]ial = a defective & ill-proportion$ !ology2 b x does n furni% fit or suffici5t mat]ial = a correct !ology4 ,z1 9 ord] to make 8 sci5ce ( optics satisfactory & complete1 ! bl9d man mu/ h ! cat>act remov$ f 8 eyes by "s compet5t oculi/1 s1 9 ord] to any complete or satisfactory !ology1 ! veil mu/ be tak5 away f ! he>t by ,god himself 7cf4 #b ,cor4 #c3ae1 #af--8;a veil lie? ^u _! he>t4 ,b :5soev] x m>g4 #8a man' %all turn to ! ,"l1 ! veil is tak5 away074 ,our doctr9e t fai? is k & ! highe/ k is to be di/+ui%$ f t ( ,rits*l1 ^: !ology is an appeal to ! he>t to ! exclusion ( ! head--to fiducia )\t notitia4 ,b fiducia includes notitia1 else x is bl9d1 irrational1 & unsci5tific4 ,rob]t ,br[n+1 9 l mann]1 fell into a deep speculative error1 :51 9 ord] to sub/antiate 8 optimi/ic fai?1 he /igmatiz$ human k z m]ely app>5t4 ,! appeal ( bo? ,rits*l & ,br[n+ f ! head to ! he>t %\ld r be an appeal f ! n>r[] k ( ! m]e intellect to ! l>g] k condition$ ^u "r affection4 ,see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,! ,great ,poets & _! ,!ology1 #dda4 ,on ,rits*l's po/ulates1 see ,/e>ns1 ,evid5ce ( ,*ri/ian ,exp]i5ce1 #bgd-bhj1 & ,pfleid]]1 ,die ,rits*l's*e ,!ologie4 ,on ! relation ( love & w to k1 see ,kaftan1 9 ,am4 ,j\r4 ,!ology1 #aijj3gag2 ,hovey1 ,manual ,*ri/4 ,!ol41 #i2 ,f\ndations ( our ,fai?1 #ab1 #ac2 ,%$d1 ,hi/4 ,doct41 #a3aed-afd2 ,presb4 ,qu>41 ,oct4 #ahga1 ,oct4 #ahgb1 ,oct4 #ahgc2 ,cald]wood1 ,philos4 ,inf9ite1 #ii1 #aag2 ,van ,oo/]zee1 ,dogmatics1 #b-h2 ,new ,engl&]1 ,july1 #ahgc3dha2 ,pr9ceton ,rev41 #ahfd3abb2 ,*ri/lieb1 ,mod4 ,d\bt1 #abd1 #abe2 ,grau1 ,glaube als h*/e ,v]nunft1 9 ,beweis des ,glaub5s1 #ahfe3aaj2 ,dorn]1 ,ges*4 prot4 ,!ol41 #bbh2 ,newman1 ,univ4 ,s]mons1 #bjf2 ,h9ton1 ,art ( ,?9k+1 ,introd4 by ,hodgson1 #e4 #b4 ,man's capacity = ! k ( ,god ,9 ! capacity ( ! human m9d = kn[+ ,god & c]ta9 ( ^! relations4--,b x has urg$ t su* k is impossible = ! foll[+ reasons3 ,a4 ,because we c "k only ph5om5a4 ,we reply3 7a7 ,we "k m5tal z well z physical ph5om5a4 7b7 ,9 kn[+ ph5om5a1 :e!r m5tal or physical1 we "k sub/ance z und]ly+ ! ph5om5a1 z manife/$ ?r\gh !m1 & z con/itut+ _! gr\nd ( unity4 7c7 ,our m9ds br+ to ! obs]vation ( ph5om5a n only ?is k ( sub/ance1 b also k ( "t1 space1 cause1 & "r1 realities :i* are 9 no s5se ph5om5al4 ,s9ce ^! objects ( k are n ph5om5al1 ! fact t ,god is n ph5om5al _c prev5t u f kn[+ him4 ,:at sub/ance is1 we ne$ n "h det]m9e4 ,:e!r we are reali/s or ideali/s1 we are compell$ to grant t !re _c be ph5om5a )\t n\m5a1 _c be appe>ances )\t some?+ t appe>s1 _c be qualities )\t some?+ t is qualifi$4 ,?is some?+ :i* und]lies or /&s "u appe>ance or quality we call sub/ance4 ,we are ,lotzeans r ?an ,kantians1 9 our philosophy4 ,to say t we "k1 n ! self1 b only its manife/ations 9 ?\ght1 is to conf\nd self ) its ?9k+ & to tea* psy*ology )\t a s\l4 ,to say t we "k no ext]nal _w1 b only its manife/ations 9 s5sations1 is to ignore ! pr9ciple t b9ds ^! s5sations toge!r2 = )\t a some:at 9 :i* qualities inh]e !y c h no gr\nd ( unity4 ,9 l mann]1 to say t we "k no?+ ( ,god b 8 manife/ations1 is to conf\nd ,god ) ! _w & practically to d5y t !re is a ,god4 ,/hl91 9 8 "w on ,kant1 ,lotze & ,rits*l1 #ahf-aia1 #bah1 #bai1 says well t 8limitation ( k to ph5om5a involves ! elim9ation f !ology ( all claim to "k ! objects ( ! ,*ri/ian fai? z !y are 9 !mselves40 ,?is criticism ju/ly classes ,rits*l ) ,kant1 r ?an ) ,lotze :o ma9ta9s t kn[+ ph5om5a we "k also ! n\m5a manife/$ 9 !m4 ,:ile ,rits*l pr(esses to foll[ ,lotze1 ! :ole drift ( 8 !ology is 9 ! direction ( ! ,kantian id5tification ( ! _w ) our s5sations1 m9d ) our ?\ghts1 & ,god ) su* activities ( 8 z we c p]ceive4 ,a div9e nature ap>t f its activities1 a preexi/5t ,*ri/1 an imman5t ,tr9ity1 are practically d5i$4 ,ass]tions t ,god is self-consci\s love & fa!rhood become judgm5ts ( m]ely subjective value4 ,on ,rits*l1 see ! works ( ,orr1 ( ,g>vie1 & ( ,sw+2 also ,m9ton1 9 ,pres4 & ,ref4 ,rev41 ,jan4 #aijb3afb-afi1 & ,c4 ,w4 ,hodge1 ibid41 ,apl4 #aijb3cba-cbf2 ,fl9t1 ,agno/icism1 #eij-eig2 ,ev]ett1 ,essays ,!ol4 & ,lit41 #ib-ii4 ,we grant t we c "k ,god only s f> z 8 activities reveal him1 & s f> z our m9ds & he>ts are receptive ( 8 revelation4 ,! appropriate faculties mu/ be ex]cis$--n ! ma!matical1 ! logical1 or ! prud5tial1 b ! e?ical & ! religi\s4 ,x is ! m]it ( ,rits*l t he recognizes ! practical 9 di/9ction f ! speculative reason2 8 error is 9 n recogniz+ t1 :5 we d ?us use ! prop] p[]s ( kn[+1 we ga9 n m]ely subjective b also objective tru?1 & come 9 contact n simply ) ,god's activities b also ) ,god himself4 ,normal religi\s judgm5ts1 ?\gh dep5d5t ^u subjective conditions1 are n simply 8judgm5ts ( wor?0 or 8value-judgm5ts10--!y give u ! k ( 8?+s 9 !mselves40 ,edw>d ,caird says ( 8 bro!r ,john ,caird 7,fund4 ,ideas ( ,*ri/ianity1 ,introd4 cxxi7--8,! conviction t ,god c be kn[n & is kn[n1 & t1 9 ! deepe/ s5se1 all our k is k ( him1 0 ! corn]-/one ( 8 !ology40 ,rits*l's ph5om5alism is alli$ to ! positivism ( ,comte1 :o reg>d$ all s-call$ k ( o!r ?an ph5om5al objects z purely negative4 ,! phrase 8,positive ,philosophy0 implies inde$ t all k ( m9d is negative2 see ,comte1 ,pos4 ,philosophy1 ,m>t9eau's translation1 #bf1 #bh1 #cc--8;,9 ord] to obs]ve1 y\r intellect mu/ pause f activity--yet x is ?is v activity y want to obs]ve4 ,if y _c effect ! pause1 y _c obs]ve2 if y d effect x1 !re is no?+ to obs]ve40 ,?is view is refut$ by ! two facts2 7#a7 consci\sness1 & 7#b7 memory2 = consci\sness is ! kn[+ ( ! self side by side ) ! kn[+ ( its ?\ghts1 & memory is ! kn[+ ( ! self side by side ) ! kn[+ ( its pa/2 see ,m>t9eau1 ,essays ,philos4 & ,!ol41 #a3bd-dj1 #bjg-bab4 ,by ph5om5a we mean 8facts1 9 di/9ction f _! gr\nd1 pr9ciple1 or law02 8nei!r ph5om5a nor qualities1 z su*1 are p]ceiv$1 b objects1 p]cepts1 or be+s2 & x is by an aft]-?\ght or reflex process t ^! are connect$ z qualities & are ref]r$ to z sub/ances02 see ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #ea1 #bch1 #ebj1 #fai-fcg1 #fdj-fde4 ,ph5om5a may be int]nal1 e4 g41 ?\ghts2 9 ?is case ! n\m5on is ! m9d1 ( :i* ^! ?\ghts are ! manife/ations4 ,or1 ph5om5a may be ext]nal1 e4 g41 color1 h>dness1 %ape1 size2 9 ?is case ! n\m5on is matt]1 ( :i* ^! qualities are ! manife/ations4 ,b qualities1 :e!r m5tal or mat]ial1 imply ! exi/5ce ( a sub/ance to :i* !y belong3 !y c no m be conceiv$ ( z exi/+ ap>t f sub/ance1 ?an ! upp] side ( a plank c be conceiv$ ( z exi/+ )\t an "u side2 see ,b[ne1 ,review ( ,h]b]t ,sp5c]1 #dg1 #bjg-bag2 ,m>t9eau1 ,types ( ,e?ical ,!ory1 #a2 #dee1 #def--8;,comte's assumption t m9d _c "k itself or its /ates is exactly balanc$ by ,kant's assumption t m9d _c "k any?+ outside ( itself4444 ,x is precisely because all k is ( relations t x is n & _c be ( ph5om5a alone4 ,! absolute _c p] se be kn[n1 because 9 be+ kn[n x w\ld ipso facto ent] into relations & be absolute no m4 ,b nei!r c ! ph5om5al p] se be kn[n1 i4 e41 be kn[n z ph5om5al1 )\t simultane\s cognition ( :at is non-ph5om5al40 ,mc,cosh1 ,intuitions1 #ach-aed1 /ates ! *>act]i/ics ( sub/ance z 7#a7 be+1 7#b7 p[]1 7#c7 p]man5ce4 ,diman1 ,!i/ic ,argum5t1 #ccg1 #cfc--8,! !ory t disproves ,god1 disproves an ext]nal _w & ! exi/5ce ( ! s\l40 ,we "k some?+ beyond ph5om5a1 viz43 law1 cause1 =ce1--or we c h no sci5ce2 see ,tullo*1 on ,comte1 9 ,mod]n ,!ories1 #ec-gc2 see also ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahgd3baa2 ,ald51 ,philosophy1 #dd2 ,hopk9s1 ,outl9e ,/udy ( ,man1 #hg2 ,flem+1 ,vocab4 ( ,philosophy1 art43 ,ph5om5a2 ,new ,engl&]1 ,july1 #ahge3ecg-eci4 ,b4 ,because we c "k only t :i* be>s analogy to our own nature or exp]i5ce4 ,we reply3 7a7 ,x is n ess5tial to k t !re be simil>ity ( nature betwe5 ! kn[] & ! kn[n4 ,we "k by diff]5ce z well z by lik5ess4 7b7 ,our pa/ exp]i5ce1 ?\gh greatly facilitat+ new acquisitions1 is n ! measure ( our possible k4 ,else ! fir/ act ( k w\ld be inexplicable1 & all revelation ( high] *>act]s to l[] w\ld be preclud$1 z well z all progress to k :i* surpasses our pres5t atta9m5ts4 7c7 ,ev5 if k dep5d$ ^u simil>ity ( nature & exp]i5ce1 we might /ill "k ,god1 s9ce we are made 9 ,god's image1 & !re are important analogies betwe5 ! div9e nature & our own4 7a7 ,! dictum ( ,emp$ocles1 8,similia similibus p]cipiuntur10 mu/ be supplem5t$ by a second dictum1 8,similia dissimilibus p]cipiuntur40 ,all ?+s are alike1 9 be+ objects4 ,b kn[+ is di/+ui%+1 & !re mu/ be contra/ betwe5 objects to awak5 our att5tion4 ,god kn[s s91 ?\gh x is ! anti!sis to 8 holy be+4 ,! ego kn[s ! non-ego4 ,we _c "k ev5 self1 )\t objectify+ x1 di/+ui%+ x f its ?\ghts1 & reg>d+ x z ano!r4 7b7 ,v]sus ,h]b]t ,sp5c]1 ,fir/ ,pr9ciples1 #gi-hb--8,k is recognition & classification40 ,b we reply t a ?+ mu/ fir/ be p]ceiv$ 9 ord] to be recogniz$ or comp>$ ) some?+ else2 & ?is is z true ( ! fir/ s5sation z ( ! lat] & m def9ite =ms ( k1--inde$ !re is no s5sation :i* does n involve1 z its complem5t1 an at lea/ incipi5t p]ception2 see ,sir ,william ,hamilton1 ,metaphysics1 #cea1 #ceb2 ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #bjf4 7c7 ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #dhf--8;,induction is possible only ^u ! assumption t ! intellect ( man is a reflex ( ! div9e intellect1 or t man is made 9 ! image ( ,god40 ,note1 h[ev]1 t man is made 9 ,god's image1 n ,god 9 man's4 ,! pa9t+ is ! image ( ! l&scape1 n1 vice v]sa1 ! l&scape ! image ( ! pa9t+2 = !re is mu* 9 ! l&scape t has no?+ correspond+ to x 9 ! pa9t+4 ,idolatry p]v]sely makes ,god 9 ! image ( man1 & s deifies man's weakness & impurity4 ,tr9ity 9 ,god may h no exact c\nt]p>t 9 man's pres5t con/itution1 ?\gh x may disclose to u ! goal ( man's future developm5t & ! mean+ ( ! increas+ diff]5tiation ( man's p[]s4 ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #aaf--8;,if an?ropomorphism z appli$ to ,god is false1 yet !omorphism z appli$ to man is true2 man is made 9 ,god's image1 & 8 qualities are1 n ! measure ( ! div9e1 b _! c\nt]p>t & real expression40 ,see ,murphy1 ,sci5tific ,bases1 #abb2 ,mc,cosh1 9 ,int]nat4 ,rev41 #ahge3aje2 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahfg3fbd2 ,m>t9eau1 ,types ( ,e?ical ,!ory1 #b3d-h1 & ,/udy ( ,religion1 #a3id4 ,c4 ,because we "k only t ( :i* we c conceive1 9 ! s5se ( =m+ an adequate m5tal image4 ,we reply3 7a7 ,x is true t we "k only t ( :i* we c conceive1 if by ! t]m 8conceive0 we mean our di/+ui%+ 9 ?\ght ! object kn[n f all o!r objects4 ,b1 7b7 ,! objection conf\nds conception ) t :i* is m]ely its occasional accompanim5t & help1 namely1 ! pictur+ ( ! object by ! imag9ation4 ,9 ?is s5se1 conceivability is n a f9al te/ ( tru?4 7c7 ,t ! =mation ( a m5tal image is n ess5tial to conception or k1 is pla9 :5 we rememb] t1 z a matt] ( fact1 we bo? conceive & "k _m ?+s ( :i* we _c =m a m5tal image ( any sort t 9 ! lea/ corresponds to ! reality2 = example1 =ce1 cause1 law1 space1 our own m9ds4 ,s we may "k ,god1 ?\gh we _c =m an adequate m5tal image ( him4 ,! objection "h refut$ is express$ mo/ cle>ly 9 ! words ( ,h]b]t ,sp5c]1 ,fir/ ,pr9ciples1 #be-cf1 #ih--8,! reality und]ly+ appe>ances is totally & =ev] inconceivable by u40 ,mansel1 ,prolegom5a ,logica1 #gg1 #gh 7cf4 #bf7 sugge/s ! s\rce ( ?is error 9 a wrong view ( ! nature ( ! concept3 8,! fir/ di/+ui%+ feature ( a concept1 viz43 t x _c 9 itself be depict$ to s5se or imag9ation40 ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #cib 7see also #dbi1 #fef7--8,! concept is n a m5tal image0--only ! p]cept is4 ,lotze3 8,color 9 g5]al is n repres5table by any image2 x looks nei!r gre5 nor r$1 b has no look :atev]40 ,! g5]ic horse has no p>ticul> color1 ?\gh ! individual horse may be black1 :ite1 or bay4 ,s ,sir ,william ,hamilton speaks ( 8! unpicturable notions ( ! intellig5ce40 ,m>t9eau1 ,religion & ,mat]ialism1 #ci1 #dj--8,?is doctr9e ( ,nesci5ce /&s 9 exactly ! same relation to causal p[]1 :e!r y con/rue x z ,mat]ial ,=ce or z ,div9e ,ag5cy4 ,nei!r c be obs]v$2 "o or ! o!r mu/ be assum$4 ,if y admit to ! category ( k only :at we le>n f obs]vation1 p>ticul> or g5]aliz$1 !n is ,=ce unkn[n2 if y ext5d ! ^w to :at is import$ by ! intellect itself into our cognitive acts1 to make !m su*1 !n is ,god kn[n40 ,matt]1 e!r1 en]gy1 protoplasm1 organism1 life1--no "o ( ^! c be portray$ to ! imag9ation2 yet ,mr4 ,sp5c] deals ) !m z objects ( ,sci5ce4 ,if ^! are n inscrutable1 :y %\ld he reg>d ! ,p[] t gives unity to all ?+s z inscrutable8 ,h]b]t ,sp5c] is n 9 fact consi/5t ) himself1 = 9 div]s p>ts ( 8 writ+s he calls ! inscrutable ,reality back ( ph5om5a ! "o1 et]nal1 ubiquit\s1 inf9ite1 ultimate1 absolute ,exi/5ce1 ,p[] & ,cause4 8,x seems10 says ,fa!r ,dalgairns1 8t a great deal is kn[n ab\t ! ,unkn[able40 ,*adwick1 ,unit>ianism1 #ge--8,! begg> phrase #8,unkn[able' becomes1 aft] ,sp5c]'s repeat$ designations ( x1 z ri* z ,croesus ) all sav+ k40 ,ma!son3 8,to "k t we "k no?+ is already to h rea*$ a fact ( k40 ,if ,mr4 ,sp5c] int5d$ to exclude ,god f ! realm ( ,k1 he %\ld fir/ h exclud$ him f ! realm ( ,exi/5ce2 = to grant t he is1 is already to grant t we n only may "k him1 b t we actually to "s ext5t d "k him2 see ,d4 ,j4 ,hill1 ,g5etic ,philosophy1 #bb2 ,mc,cosh1 ,intuitions1 #ahf-ahi 7,eng4 ed41 #bad72 ,murphy1 ,sci5tific ,bases1 #acc2 ,b[ne1 ,review ( ,sp5c]1 #cj-cd2 ,new ,engl&]1 ,july1 #ahge3edc1 #edd2 ,osc> ,craig1 9 ,presb4 ,rev41 ,july1 #ahhc3eid-fjb4 ,d4 ,because we c "k truly only t :i* we "k 9 :ole & n 9 "p4 ,we reply3 7a7 ,! objection conf\nds p>tial k ) ! k ( a "p4 ,we "k ! m9d 9 "p1 b we d n "k a "p ( ! m9d4 7b7 ,if ! objection 7 valid1 no real k ( any?+ w\ld be possible1 s9ce we "k no s+le ?+ 9 all its relations4 ,we conclude t1 al?\gh ,god is a be+ n compos$ ( p>ts1 we may yet h a p>tial k ( him1 & ?is k1 ?\gh n exhau/ive1 may yet be real1 & adequate to ! purposes ( sci5ce4 7a7 ,! objection m5tion$ 9 ! text is urg$ by ,mansel1 ,limits ( ,religi\s ,?\ght1 #ig1 #ih1 & is answ]$ by ,m>t9eau1 ,essays1 #a3bia4 ,! m9d does n exi/ 9 space1 & x has no p>ts3 we _c speak ( its s\?-we/ corn]1 nor c we divide x into halves4 ,yet we f9d ! mat]ial = m5tal sci5ce 9 p>tial k ( ! m9d4 ,s1 :ile we are n 8geograph]s ( ! div9e nature0 7,b[ne1 ,review ( ,sp5c]1 #gb71 we may say ) ,paul1 n 8n[ "k we a "p ( ,god10 b 8n[ ,i "k ,god1 9 "p0 7#a ,cor4 #ac3ab74 ,we may "k truly :at we d n "k exhau/ively2 see ,eph4 #c3ai--8to "k ! love ( ,*ri/ :i* passe? k40 ,i d n p]fectly und]/& myself1 yet ,i "k myself 9 "p2 s ,i may "k ,god1 ?\gh ,i d n p]fectly und]/& him4 7b7 ,! same argum5t t proves ,god unkn[able proves ! univ]se unkn[able also4 ,s9ce e p>ticle ( matt] 9 ! univ]se attracts e o!r1 no "o p>ticle c be exhau/ively expla9$ )\t tak+ acc\nt ( all ! re/4 ,?omas ,c>lyle3 8,x is a ma!matical fact t ! ca/+ ( ?is pebble f my h& alt]s ! c5tre ( gravity ( ! univ]se40 ,t5nyson1 ,high] ,pan!ism3 8,fl[] 9 ! cranni$ wall1 ,i pluck y out ( ! crannies2 ,hold y "h1 root & all1 9 my h&1 ,little fl[]2 b if ,i c\ld und]/& ,:at y are1 root & all1 & all 9 all1 ,i %\ld "k :at ,god & man is40 ,s*urman1 ,agno/icism1 #aai--8,p>tial z x is1 ?is vision ( ! div9e transfigures ! life ( man on e>?40 ,pfleid]]1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #a3afg--8;,a fa9t-he>t$ agno/icism is worse ?an ! arrogant & titanic gno/icism aga9/ :i* x prote/s40 ,e4 ,because all pr$icates ( ,god are negative1 & !re=e furni% no real k4 ,we answ]3 7a7 ,pr$icates d]iv$ f our consci\sness1 su* z _s1 love1 & hol9ess1 are positive4 7b7 ,! t]ms 8inf9ite0 & 8absolute10 moreov]1 express n m]ely a negative b a positive idea--! idea1 9 ! =m] case1 ( ! abs5ce ( all limit1 ! idea t ! object ?us describ$ goes on & on =ev]2 ! idea1 9 ! latt] case1 ( entire self-suffici5cy4 ,s9ce pr$icates ( ,god1 !re=e1 are n m]ely negative1 ! argum5t m5tion$ above furni%es no valid reason :y we may n "k him4 ,v]sus ,sir ,william ,hamilton1 ,metaphysics1 #ecj--8,! absolute & ! inf9ite c ea* only be conceiv$ z a negation ( ! ?9kable2 9 o!r words1 ( ! absolute & inf9ite we h no conception at all40 ,hamilton "h conf\nds ! inf9ite1 or ! abs5ce ( all limits1 ) ! indef9ite1 or ! abs5ce ( all kn[n limits4 ,p] contra1 see ,cald]wood1 ,moral ,philosophy1 #bdh1 & ,philosophy ( ! ,inf9ite1 #bgb--8,negation ( "o ?+ is possible only by affirmation ( ano!r40 ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #feb--8;,if ! ,s&wi* ,isl&]s1 = lack ( "n1 _h call$ ! ox a n-hog1 ! use ( a negative appellation w\ld n necess>ily au?orize ! inf]5ce ( a want ( def9ite conceptions or positive k40 ,s ) ! inf9ite or n-f9ite1 ! uncondition$ or n-condition$1 ! indep5d5t or n-dep5d5t1--^! names d n imply t we _c conceive & "k x z some?+ positive4 ,sp5c]1 ,fir/ ,pr9ciples1 #ib--8,our consci\sness ( ! ,absolute1 indef9ite ?\gh x is1 is positive1 & n negative40 ,s*urman1 ,agno/icism1 #ajj1 speaks ( 8! f>ce ( nesci5ce play+ at omnisci5ce 9 sett+ ! b\nds ( sci5ce40 8,! agno/ic10 he says1 8sets up ! invisible picture ( a ,gr& tre1 =mless & colorless 9 itself1 absolutely sep>at$ f man & f ! _w--blank )9 & void )\t--its v exi/5ce indi/+ui%able f its non-exi/5ce1 &1 b[+ d[n be=e ?is idolatr\s creation1 he p\rs out 8 s\l 9 lam5tations ov] ! incognizabl5ess ( su* a my/]i\s & awful non-entity4444 ,! tru? is t ! agno/ic's ab/raction ( a ,deity is unkn[n1 only because x is unreal40 ,see ,mc,cosh1 ,intuitions1 #aid1 note2 ,miv>t1 ,lessons f ,nature1 #cfc4 ,god is n necess>ily inf9ite 9 e respect4 ,he is inf9ite only 9 e excell5ce4 ,a plane :i* is unlimit$ 9 ! "o respect ( l5g? may be limit$ 9 ano!r respect1 su* z bread?4 ,our doctr9e "h is n !re=e inconsi/5t ) :at imm$iately foll[s4 ,f4 ,because to "k is to limit or def9e4 ,h5ce ! ,absolute z unlimit$1 & ! ,inf9ite z undef9$1 _c be kn[n4 ,we answ]3 7a7 ,god is absolute1 n z exi/+ 9 no relation1 b z exi/+ 9 no necess>y relation2 & 7b7 ,god is inf9ite1 n z exclud+ all coexi/5ce ( ! f9ite ) himself1 b z be+ ! gr\nd ( ! f9ite1 & s unfett]$ by x4 7c7 ,god is actually limit$ by ! un*angeabl5ess ( 8 own attributes & p]sonal di/9ctions1 z well z by 8 self-*os5 relations to ! univ]se he has creat$ & to humanity 9 ! p]son ( ,*ri/4 ,god is !re=e limit$ & def9$ 9 su* a s5se z to r5d] k ( him possible4 ,v]sus ,mansel1 ,limitations ( ,religi\s ,?\ght1 #ge-hd1 #ic-ie2 cf4 ,sp9oza3 8,omnis det]m9atio e/ negatio20 h5ce to def9e ,god is to d5y him4 ,b we reply t p]fection is insep>able f limitation4 ,man c be o!r ?an he is3 n s ,god1 at lea/ int]nally4 ,b ?is limitation1 inh]5t 9 8 un*angeable attributes & p]sonal di/9ctions1 is ,god's p]fection4 ,ext]nally1 all limitations ^u ,god are self-limitations1 & s are consi/5t ) 8 p]fection4 ,t ,god %\ld n be able ?us to limit himself 9 creation & r$emption w\ld r5d] all self-sacrifice 9 him impossible1 & s w\ld subject him to ! greate/ ( limitations4 ,we may say !re=e t ,god's #a4 ,p]fection involves 8 limitation to 7a7 p]sonality1 7b7 tr9ity1 7c7 righte\sness2 #b4 ,revelation involves 8 self-limitation 9 7a7 decree1 7b7 creation1 7c7 pres]vation1 7d7 gov]nm5t1 7e7 education ( ! _w2 #c4 ,r$emption involves 8 inf9ite self-limitation 9 ! 7a7 p]son & 7b7 "w ( ,jesus ,*ri/2 see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #hg-aja1 & 9 ,bap4 ,qu>4 ,rev41 ,jan4 #ahia3eba-ecb4 ,b[ne1 ,philos4 ( ,!ism1 #ace--8,! inf9ite is n ! quantitative all2 ! absolute is n ! unrelat$4444 ,bo? absolute & inf9ite mean only ! indep5d5t gr\nd ( ?+s40 ,julius ,mll]1 ,doct4 ,s91 ,introduc41 #aj--8,religion has to d1 n ) an ,object t mu/ let itself be kn[n because its v exi/5ce is cont+5t ^u its be+ kn[n1 b ) ! ,object 9 relation to :om we are truly subject1 dep5d5t ^u him1 & wait+ until he manife/ himself40 ,james ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy ( ,religion1 #a3cdf--8,we mu/ n conf\nd ! inf9ite ) ! total4444 ,! self-abnegation ( inf9ity is b a =m ( self-ass]tion1 & ! only =m 9 :i* x c reveal itself4444 ,h[ev] in/antane\s ! omnisci5t ?\ght1 h[ev] sure ! almighty p[]1 ! execution has to be di/ribut$ 9 "t1 & mu/ h an ord] ( successive /eps2 on no o!r t]ms c ! et]nal become temporal1 & ! inf9ite articulately speak 9 ! f9ite40 ,p]fect p]sonality excludes1 n self-det]m9ation1 b det]m9ation f )\t1 det]m9ation by ano!r4 ,god's self-limitations are ! self-limitations ( love1 & !re=e ! evid5ces ( 8 p]fection4 ,!y are signs1 n ( weakness b ( p[]4 ,god has limit$ himself to ! me?od ( evolution1 gradually unfold+ himself 9 nature & 9 hi/ory4 ,! gov]nm5t ( s9n]s by a holy ,god involves con/ant self-repression4 ,! education ( ! race is a long process ( div9e =be>ance2 ,h]d]3 8,! limitations ( ! pupil are limitations ( ! tea*] also40 ,9 inspiration1 ,god limits himself by ! human elem5t ?r\gh :i* he works4 ,above all1 9 ! p]son & "w ( ,*ri/1 we h inf9ite self-limitation3 ,inf9ity n>r[s itself d[n to a po9t 9 ! inc>nation1 & hol9ess endures ! agonies ( ! ,cross4 ,god's promises are also self-limitations4 ,?us bo? nature & grace are self-impos$ re/rictions ^u ,god1 & ^! self-limitations are ! means by :i* he reveals himself4 ,see ,pfleid]]1 ,die ,religion1 #a3ahi1 #aie2 ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #fec2 ,murphy1 ,sci5tific ,bases1 #acj2 ,cald]wood1 ,philos4 ,inf9ite1 #afh2 ,mc,cosh1 ,intuitions1 #ahf2 ,hickok1 ,rational ,cosmology1 #he2 ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy ( ,religion1 #b3he1 #hf1 #cfb2 ,%$d1 ,dogmatic ,!ology1 #a3ahi-aia4 ,g4 ,because all k is relative to ! kn[+ ag5t2 t is1 :at we "k1 we "k1 n z x is objectively1 b only z x is relat$ to our own s5ses & faculties4 ,9 reply3 7a7 ,we grant t we c "k only t :i* has relation to our faculties4 ,b ?is is simply to say t we "k only t :i* we come into m5tal contact )1 t is1 we "k only :at we "k4 ,b1 7b7 ,we d5y t :at we come into m5tal contact ) is kn[n by u z o!r ?an x is4 ,s f> z x is kn[n at all1 x is kn[n z x is4 ,9 o!r words1 ! laws ( our kn[+ are n m]ely arbitr>y & regulative1 b correspond to ! nature ( ?+s4 ,we conclude t1 9 !ology1 we are equally w>rant$ 9 assum+ t ! laws ( our ?\ght are laws ( ,god's ?\ght1 & t ! results ( normally conduct$ ?9k+ ) reg>d to ,god correspond to ! objective reality4 ,v]sus ,sir ,wm4 ,hamilton1 ,metaph41 #if-aaf1 & ,h]b]t ,sp5c]1 ,fir/ ,pr9ciples1 #fh-ig4 ,?is doctr9e ( relativity is d]iv$ f ,kant1 ,critique ( ,pure ,reason1 :o holds t a priori judgm5ts are simply 8regulative40 ,b we reply t :5 our primitive beliefs are f\nd to be simply regulative1 !y w cease to regulate4 ,! =ms ( ?\ght are also facts ( nature4 ,! m9d does n1 l ! glass ( a kaleidoscope1 itself furni% ! =ms2 x recognizes ^! z hav+ an exi/5ce ext]nal to itself4 ,! m9d reads its ideas1 n into nature1 b 9 nature4 ,our intuitions are n gre5 goggles1 :i* make all ! _w seem gre53 !y are ! l5ses ( a microscope1 :i* enable u to see :at is objectively real 7,royce1 ,_s ( ,mod4 ,philos41 #abe74 ,kant call$ our und]/&+ 8! legislator ( nature40 ,b x is s1 only z discov]] ( nature's laws1 n z creator ( !m4 ,human reason does impose its laws & =ms ^u ! univ]se2 b1 9 do+ ?is1 x int]prets ! real mean+ ( ! univ]se4 ,ladd1 ,philos4 ( ,k3 8,all judgm5t implies an objective tru? accord+ to :i* we judge1 :i* con/itutes ! /&>d1 & ) :i* we h some?+ 9 common1 i4 e41 our m9ds are "p ( an inf9ite & et]nal ,m9d40 ,fr5* aphorism3 8,:5 y are "r1 y are m "r ?an y ?9k y are40 ,god w n put u to p]man5t intellectual confusion4 ,kant va9ly wrote 8,no ?or\ghf>e0 ov] ! reason 9 its highe/ ex]cise4 ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy ( ,religion1 #a3ace1 #acf--8,ov] aga9/ ,kant's assumption t ! m9d _c "k any?+ outside ( itself1 we may set ,comte's equally unw>rantable assumption t ! m9d _c "k itself or its /ates4 ,we _c h philosophy )\t assumptions4 ,y dogmatize if y say t ! =ms correspond ) reality2 b y equally dogmatize if y say t !y d n4444 #gi--,t our cognitive faculties correspond to ?+s z !y are1 is mu* less surpris+ ?an t !y %\ld correspond to ?+s z !y are n40 ,w4 ,t4 ,h>ris1 9 ,j\rn4 ,spec4 ,philos41 #a3bb1 exposes ,h]b]t ,sp5c]'s self-contradiction3 8,all k is1 n absolute1 b relative2 our k ( ?is fact h[ev] is1 n relative1 b absolute40 ,rits*l1 ,ju/ification & ,reconciliation1 #c3af-ba1 sets out ) a correct /atem5t ( ! nature ( k1 & gives 9 8 adhesion to ! doctr9e ( ,lotze1 z di/+ui%$ f t ( ,kant4 ,rits*l's /atem5t may be summ>iz$ z foll[s3 8,we deal1 n ) ! ab/ract ,god ( metaphysics1 b ) ! ,god self-limit$1 :o is reveal$ 9 ,*ri/4 ,we d n "k ei!r ?+s or ,god ap>t f _! ph5om5a or manife/ations1 z ,plato imag9$2 we d n "k ph5om5a or manife/ations alone1 )\t kn[+ ei!r ?+s or ,god1 z ,kant suppos$2 b we d "k bo? ?+s & ,god 9 _! ph5om5a or manife/ations1 z ,lotze taught4 ,we hold to no my/ical union ) ,god1 back ( all exp]i5ce 9 religion1 z ,pietism does2 s\l is always & only active1 & religion is ! activity ( ! human _s1 9 :i* feel+1 kn[+ & will+ comb9e 9 an intelligible ord]40 ,b ,dr4 ,c4 ,m4 ,mead1 ,rits*l's ,place 9 ! ,hi/ory ( ,doctr9e1 has well %[n t ,rits*l has n foll[$ ,lotze4 ,8 8value-judgm5ts0 are simply an application to !ology ( ! 8regulative0 pr9ciple ( ,kant4 ,he holds t we c "k ?+s n z !y are 9 !mselves1 b only z !y are = u4 ,we reply t :at ?+s are wor? = u dep5ds on :at !y are 9 !mselves4 ,rits*l reg>ds ! doctr9es ( ,*ri/'s preexi/5ce1 div9ity & atonem5t z intrusions ( metaphysics into !ology1 matt]s ab\t :i* we _c "k1 & ) :i* we h no?+ to d4 ,!re is no propitiation or my/ical union ) ,*ri/2 & ,*ri/ is our ,example1 b n our aton+ ,savior4 ,rits*l does well 9 recogniz+ t love 9 u gives eyes to ! m9d1 & enables u to see ! beauty ( ,*ri/ & 8 tru?4 ,b our judgm5t is n1 z he holds1 a m]ely subjective value-judgm5t1--x is a com+ 9 contact ) objective fact4 ,on ! !ory ( k held by ,kant1 ,hamilton & ,sp5c]1 see ,bi%op ,temple1 ,bampton ,lectures = #ahhd3ac2 ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 ,fai? & ,philosophy1 #big-ccf2 ,j4 ,s4 ,mill1 ,exam9ation1 #a3aac-acd2 ,h]b]t1 ,mod]n ,realism ,exam9$2 ,m4 ,b4 ,&]son1 art43 8,hamilton10 9 ,johnson's ,encyclopdia2 ,mc,cosh1 ,intuitions1 #aci-adf1 #cdj1 #cda1 & ,*ri/ianity & ,positivism1 #ig-abc2 ,maurice1 ,:at is ,revelation8 ,ald51 ,intellectual ,philosophy1 #dh-gi1 esp4 #ga-gi2 ,port]1 ,hum4 ,intellect1 #ebc2 ,murphy1 ,sci5tific ,bases1 #ajc2 ,bib4 ,sac4 ,april1 #ahfh3cda2 ,pr9ceton ,rev41 #ahfd3abb2 ,b[ne1 ,review ( ,h]b]t ,sp5c]1 #gf2 ,b[51 9 ,pr9ceton ,rev41 ,m>*1 #ahgh3dde-ddh2 ,m9d1 ,april1 #ahgh3beg2 ,c>p5t]1 ,m5tal ,physiology1 #aag2 ,h>ris1 ,philos4 ,basis ( ,!ism1 #aji-aac2 ,iv]a*1 9 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #e3 ,no4 #bi2 ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy ( ,religion1 #a3gi1 #abj1 #aba1 #ace1 #acf4 #c4 ,god's revelation ( himself to man4 ,9 ,god's actual revelation ( himself & c]ta9 ( ^! relations4--,z we d n 9 ?is place attempt a positive pro( ( ,god's exi/5ce or ( man's capacity = ! k ( ,god1 s we d n n[ attempt to prove t ,god has br\ght himself into contact ) man's m9d by revelation4 ,we %all consid] ! gr\nds ( ?is belief h]eaft]4 ,our aim at pres5t is simply to %[ t1 grant+ ! fact ( revelation1 a sci5tific !ology is possible4 ,?is has be5 d5i$ ^u ! foll[+ gr\nds3 ,a4 ,t revelation1 z a mak+ kn[n1 is necess>ily int]nal & subjective--ei!r a mode ( intellig5ce1 or a quick5+ ( man's cognitive p[]s--& h5ce c furni% no objective facts su* z con/itute ! prop] mat]ial = sci5ce4 ,morell1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #abh-aca1 #adc--8,! ,bible _c 9 /rict accuracy ( language be call$ a revelation1 s9ce a revelation always implies an actual process ( intellig5ce 9 a liv+ m9d40 ,f4 ,w4 ,newman1 ,phases ( ,fai?1 #aeb--8,( our moral & spiritual ,god we "k no?+ )\t--ev]y?+ )940 ,!odore ,p>k]3 8,v]bal revelation c nev] communicate a simple idea l t ( ,god1 ,ju/ice1 ,love1 ,religion02 see review ( ,p>k] 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ah3bd-bg4 ,james ,m>t9eau1 ,seat ( ,au?ority 9 ,religion3 8,z _m m9ds z !re are t "k ,god at fir/ h&1 s _m reveal+ acts !re h be51 & z _m z "k him at second h& are /rang]s to revelation02 s1 assum+ ext]nal revelation to be impossible1 ,m>t9eau subjects all ! pro(s ( su* revelation to unfair de/ructive criticism4 ,pfleid]]1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #a3ahe--8;,z all revelation is orig9ally an inn] liv+ exp]i5ce1 ! spr++ up ( religi\s tru? 9 ! he>t1 no ext]nal ev5t c belong 9 itself to revelation1 no matt] :e!r x be naturally or sup]naturally br\ght ab\t40 ,pr(essor ,george ,m4 ,=bes3 8,no?+ c be reveal$ to u :i* we d n grasp ) our reason4 ,x foll[s t1 s f> z reason acts normally1 x is a "p ( revelation40 ,rit*ie1 ,d>w9 & ,hegel1 #cj--8,! revelation ( ,god is ! gr[? ( ! idea ( ,god40 ,9 reply to ?is objection1 urg$ ma9ly by ideali/s 9 philosophy1 7a7 ,we grant t revelation1 to be effective1 mu/ be ! means ( induc+ a new mode ( intellig5ce1 or 9 o!r words1 mu/ be und]/ood4 ,we grant t ?is und]/&+ ( div9e ?+s is impossible )\t a quick5+ ( man's cognitive p[]s4 ,we grant1 moreov]1 t revelation1 :5 orig9ally imp>t$1 0 (t5 int]nal & subjective4 ,ma!son1 ,mom5ts on ! ,m\nt1 #ea-ec1 on ,gal4 #a3af--8to reveal 8 ,son 9 me03 8,! revelation on ! way to ,damascus w\ld n h enlight5$ ,paul1 _h x be5 m]ely a vision to 8 eye4 ,no?+ c be reveal$ to u :i* has n be5 reveal$ 9 u4 ,! eye does n see ! beauty ( ! l&scape1 nor ! e> he> ! beauty ( music4 ,s fle% & blood d n reveal ,*ri/ to u4 ,)\t ! tea*+ ( ! ,_s1 ! ext]nal facts w be only l ! lett]s ( a book to a *ild t _c read40 ,we may say ) ,*ann+3 8,i am m sure t my rational nature is f ,god1 ?an t any book is ! expression ( 8 w40 7b7 ,b we d5y t ext]nal revelation is !re=e useless or impossible4 ,ev5 if religi\s ideas sprang :olly f )91 an ext]nal revelation might /ir up ! dormant p[]s ( ! m9d4 ,religi\s ideas1 h[ev]1 d n spr+ :olly f )94 ,ext]nal revelation c imp>t !m4 ,man c reveal himself to man by ext]nal communications1 &1 if ,god has equal p[] ) man1 ,god c reveal himself to man 9 l mann]4 ,rog]s1 9 8 ,eclipse ( ,fai?1 asks po9t$ly3 8,if ,messrs4 ,morell & ,newman c tea* by a book1 _c ,god d ! same80 ,lotze1 ,microcosmos1 #b3ffj 7book #i1 *ap4 #d71 speaks ( revelation z 8ei!r conta9$ 9 "s div9e act ( hi/oric occurr5ce1 or cont9ually repeat$ 9 m5's he>ts40 ,b 9 fact !re is no alt]native "h2 ! /r5g? ( ! ,*ri/ian cre$ is t ,god's revelation is bo? ext]nal & int]nal2 see ,gore1 9 ,lux ,mundi1 #cch4 ,ra9y1 9 ,critical ,review1 #a3a-ba1 well says t ,m>t9eau unw>rantably isolates ! witness ( ,god to ! individual s\l4 ,! inw>d ne$s to be comb9$ ) ! outw>d1 9 ord] to make sure t x is n a vag>y ( ! imag9ation4 ,we ne$ to di/+ui% ,god's revelations f our own fancies4 ,h5ce1 be=e giv+ ! int]nal1 ,god commonly gives u ! ext]nal1 z a /&>d by :i* to try our impressions4 ,we are f9ite & s9ful1 & we ne$ au?ority4 ,! ext]nal revelation comm5ds itself z au?oritative to ! he>t :i* recognizes its own spiritual ne$s4 ,ext]nal au?ority evokes ! inw>d witness & gives add$ cle>ness to x1 b only hi/orical revelation furni%es indubitable pro( t ,god is love1 & gives u assurance t our long+s aft] ,god are n 9 va94 7c7 ,h5ce ,god's revelation may be1 &1 z we %all h]eaft] see1 x is1 9 great "p1 an ext]nal revelation 9 works & words4 ,! univ]se is a revelation ( ,god2 ,god's works 9 nature prec$e ,god's words 9 hi/ory4 ,we claim1 moreov]1 t1 9 _m cases :]e tru? 0 orig9ally communicat$ int]nally1 ! same ,_s :o communicat$ x has br\ght ab\t an ext]nal record ( x1 s t ! int]nal revelation might be h&$ d[n to o!rs ?an ^? :o fir/ receiv$ x4 ,we mu/ n limit revelation to ! ,scriptures4 ,! et]nal ,^w ant$at$ ! writt5 ^w1 & ?r\gh ! et]nal ,^w ,god is made kn[n 9 nature & 9 hi/ory4 ,int]nal revelation is prec$$ by1 & condition$ ^u1 ext]nal revelation4 ,9 po9t ( "t e>? comes be=e man1 & s5sation be=e p]ception4 ,action be/ expresses "*1 & hi/oric revelation is m by de$s ?an by words4 ,dorn]1 ,hi/4 ,prot4 ,!ol41 #a3bca-bfd--8,! ,^w is n 9 ! ,scriptures alone4 ,! :ole creation reveals ! ,^w4 ,9 nature ,god %[s 8 p[]2 9 inc>nation 8 grace & tru?4 ,scripture te/ifies ( ^!1 b ,scripture is n ! ess5tial ,^w4 ,! ,scripture is truly appreh5d$ & appropriat$ :5 9 x & ?r\gh x we see ! liv+ & pres5t ,*ri/4 ,x does n b9d m5 to itself alone1 b x po9ts !m to ! ,*ri/ ( :om x te/ifies4 ,*ri/ is ! au?ority4 ,9 ! ,scriptures he po9ts u to himself & dem&s our fai? 9 him4 ,?is fai?1 once begott51 leads u to new appropriation ( ,scripture1 b also to new criticism ( ,scripture4 ,we f9d ,*ri/ m & m 9 ,scripture1 & yet we judge ,scripture m & m by ! /&>d :i* we f9d 9 ,*ri/40 ,newman ,smy?1 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics1 #ga-hb3 8,!re is b "o au?ority--,*ri/4 ,8 ,_s works 9 _m ways1 b *iefly 9 two3 fir/1 ! inspiration ( ! ,scriptures1 &1 secondly1 ! lead+ ( ! *ur* into ! tru?4 ,! latt] is n to be isolat$ or sep>at$ f ! =m]4 ,scripture is law to ! ,*ri/ian consci\sness1 & ,*ri/ian consci\sness 9 "t becomes law to ! ,scripture--int]pret+1 criticiz+1 v]ify+ x4 ,! ^w & ! _s answ] to ea* o!r4 ,scripture & fai? are cord9ate4 ,prote/antism has exagg]at$ ! fir/2 ,romanism ! second4 ,m>t9eau fails to grasp ! cord9ation ( ,scripture & fai?40 7d7 ,) ?is ext]nal record we %all also see t !re is giv5 "u prop] conditions a special influ5ce ( ,god's ,_s1 s to quick5 our cognitive p[]s t ! ext]nal record reproduces 9 our m9ds ! ideas ) :i* ! m9ds ( ! writ]s 7 at fir/ div9ely fill$4 ,we may illu/rate ! ne$ ( int]nal revelation f ,egyptology1 :i* is impossible s long z ! ext]nal revelation 9 ! hi]oglyphics is un9t]pret$2 f ! tick+ ( ! clock 9 a d>k room1 :]e only ! lit c&le enables u to tell ! "t2 f ! l&scape spread out ar\nd ! ,rigi 9 ,switz]l&1 invisible until ! fir/ rays ( ! sun t\* ! sn[y m\nta9 peaks4 ,ext]nal revelation 71 ,rom4 #a3ai1 #bj7 mu/ be supplem5t$ by int]nal revelation 71 #a ,cor4 #b3aj1 #ab74 ,*ri/ is ! organ ( ext]nal1 ! ,holy ,_s ! organ ( int]nal1 revelation4 ,9 ,*ri/ 7#b ,cor4 #a3bj7 are 8! yea0 & 8! ,am50--! objective c]ta9ty & ! subjective c]titude1 ! reality & ! realization4 ,objective c]ta9ty mu/ become subjective c]titude 9 ord] to be a sci5tific !ology4 ,be=e conv]sion we h ! fir/1 ! ext]nal tru? ( ,*ri/2 only at conv]sion & aft] conv]sion d we h ! second1 8,*ri/ =m$ 9 u0 7,gal4 #d3ai74 ,we h objective revelation at ,s9ai 7,ex4 #bj3bb72 subjective revelation 9 ,eli%a's k ( ,gehazi 7#b ,k4 #e3bf74 ,james ,russell ,l[ell1 ,w9t] ,ev5+ ,hymn to my ,fire3 8,!re=e ) !e ,i love to read ,our brave old poets3 at ?y t\* h[ /irs ,life 9 ! )]$ words6 h[ swift rec$e ,"t's %ad[s6 & h[ gl[s aga9 ,?r\gh its dead mass ! inc&esc5t v]se1 ,z :5 ^u ! anvil ( ! bra9 ,x glitt]+ lay1 cyclopically wr\ght ,by ! fa/ ?robb+ hamm]s ( ! poet's ?\ght60 7e7 ,int]nal revelations ?us record$1 & ext]nal revelations ?us int]pret$1 bo? furni% objective facts :i* may s]ve z prop] mat]ial = sci5ce4 ,al?\gh revelation 9 its wide/ s5se may include1 & z con/itut+ ! gr\nd ( ! possibility ( !ology does include1 bo? insight & illum9ation1 x may also be us$ to d5ote simply a provision ( ! ext]nal means ( k1 & !ology has to d ) inw>d revelations only z !y are express$ 91 or z !y agree )1 ?is objective /&>d4 ,we h "h sugge/$ ! va/ scope & yet ! insup]able limitations ( !ology4 ,s f> z ,god is reveal$1 :e!r 9 nature1 hi/ory1 consci5ce1 or ,scripture1 !ology may f9d mat]ial = its /ructure4 ,s9ce ,*ri/ is n simply ! inc>nate ,son ( ,god b also ! et]nal ,^w1 ! only ,reveal] ( ,god1 !re is no !ology ap>t f ,*ri/1 & all !ology is ,*ri/ian !ology4 ,nature & hi/ory are b ! dimm] & m g5]al disclosures ( ! div9e ,be+1 ( :i* ! ,cross is ! culm9ation & ! key4 ,god does n int5tionally conceal himself4 ,he wi%es to be kn[n4 ,he reveals himself at all times j z fully z ! capacity ( 8 creatures w p]mit4 ,! infantile intellect _c und]/& ,god's b\ndlessness1 nor c ! p]v]se disposition und]/& ,god's dis9t]e/$ affection4 ,yet all tru? is 9 ,*ri/ & is op5 to discov]y by ! prep>$ m9d & he>t4 ,! ,inf9ite ,"o1 s f> z he is unreveal$1 is c]ta9ly unkn[able to ! f9ite4 ,b ! ,inf9ite ,"o1 s f> z he manife/s himself1 is kn[able4 ,?is sugge/s ! mean+ ( ! decl>ations3 ,john #a3ah--8,no man ha? se5 ,god at any "t2 ! only begott5 ,son1 :o is 9 ! bosom ( ! ,fa!r1 he ha? decl>$ him02 #ad3i--8;he t ha? se5 me ha? se5 ! ,fa!r02 #a ,tim4 #f3af--8:om no man ha? se51 nor c see40 ,we !re=e approve ( ! def9ition ( ,kaftan1 ,dogmatik1 #a--8;,dogmatics is ! sci5ce ( ! ,*ri/ian tru? :i* is believ$ & ackn[l$g$ 9 ! *ur* ^u ! gr\nd ( ! div9e revelation0--9 s f> z x limits ! scope ( !ology to tru? reveal$ by ,god & appreh5d$ by fai?4 ,b !ology presupposes bo? ,god's ext]nal & ,god's int]nal revelations1 & ^!1 z we %all see1 include nature1 hi/ory1 consci5ce & ,scripture4 ,on ! :ole subject1 see ,kahnis1 ,dogmatik1 #c3cg-dc2 ,nitzs*1 ,sy/em ,*ri/4 ,doct41 #gb2 ,lu?>dt1 ,fund4 ,tru?s1 #aic2 ,aub]l51 ,div4 ,rev41 ,introd41 #bi2 ,m>t9eau1 ,essays1 #a3aga1 #bhj2 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahfg3eic1 & #ahgb3dbh2 ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #cgc-cge2 ,c4 ,m4 ,mead1 9 ,bo/on ,lectures1 #ahga3eh4 ,b4 ,t _m ( ! tru?s ?us reveal$ are too indef9ite to con/itute ! mat]ial = sci5ce1 because !y belong to ! region ( ! feel+s1 because !y are beyond our full und]/&+1 or because !y are de/itute ( ord]ly arrangem5t4 ,we reply3 7a7 ,!ology has to d ) subjective feel+s only z !y c be def9$1 & %[n to be effects ( objective tru? ^u ! m9d4 ,!y are n m obscure ?an are ! facts ( morals or ( psy*ology1 & ! same objection :i* w\ld exclude su* feel+s f !ology w\ld make ^! latt] sci5ces impossible4 ,see ,jacobi & ,s*lei]ma*]1 :o reg>d !ology z a m]e acc\nt ( dev\t ,*ri/ian feel+s1 ! gr\nd+ ( :i* 9 objective hi/orical facts is a matt] ( comp>ative indiff]5ce 7,hag5ba*1 ,hi/4 ,doctr9e1 #b3dja-djc74 ,s*lei]ma*] !re=e call$ 8 sy/em ( !ology 8,d] ,*ri/li*e ,glaube10 & _m s9ce 8 "t h call$ _! sy/ems by ! "n ( 8,glaub5slehre40 ,rits*l's 8value-judgm5ts10 9 l mann]1 r5d] !ology a m]ely subjective sci5ce1 if any subjective sci5ce is possible4 ,kaftan improves ^u ,rits*l1 by grant+ t we "k1 n only ,*ri/ian feel+s1 b also ,*ri/ian facts4 ,!ology is ! sci5ce ( ,god1 & n simply ! sci5ce ( fai?4 ,alli$ to ! view already m5tion$ is t ( ,feu]ba*1 to :om religion is a matt] ( subjective fancy2 & t ( ,tyndall1 :o w\ld remit !ology to ! region ( vague feel+ & aspiration1 b w\ld exclude x f ! realm ( sci5ce2 see ,feu]ba*1 ,ess5ce ( ,*ri/ianity1 translat$ by ,m>ian ,evans 7,george ,eliot72 also ,tyndall1 ,belfa/ ,address4 7b7 ,^? facts ( revelation :i* are beyond our full und]/&+ may1 l ! nebul> hypo!sis 9 a/ronomy1 ! atomic !ory 9 *emi/ry1 or ! doctr9e ( evolution 9 biology1 furni% a pr9ciple ( union betwe5 great classes ( o!r facts o!rwise irreconcilable4 ,we may def9e our concepts ( ,god1 & ev5 ( ! ,tr9ity1 at lea/ suffici5tly to di/+ui% !m f all o!r concepts2 & :atev] difficulty may encumb] ! putt+ ( !m into language only %[s ! importance ( attempt+ x & ! value ( ev5 an approximate success4 ,horace ,bu%nell3 8,!ology c nev] be a sci5ce1 on acc\nt ( ! infirmities ( language40 ,b ?is pr9ciple w\ld r5d] void bo? e?ical & political sci5ce4 ,fi%]1 ,nat4 & ,me?4 ( ,revelation1 #ade--8;,hume & ,gibbon ref] to fai? z some?+ too sacr$ to re/ on pro(4 ,?us religi\s beliefs are made to hang 9 mid-air1 )\t any support4 ,b ! f\ndation ( ^! beliefs is no less solid = ! reason t empirical te/s are n applicable to !m4 ,! data on :i* !y re/ are real1 & ! inf]5ces f ! data are fairly drawn40 ,hodgson inde$ p\rs contempt on ! :ole intuitional me?od by say+3 8,:atev] y are totally ignorant (1 ass]t to be ! explanation ( ev]y?+ else60 ,yet he w\ld probably grant t he beg9s 8 inve/igations by assum+ 8 own exi/5ce4 ,! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity is n :olly compreh5sible by u1 & we accept x at ! fir/ ^u ! te/imony ( ,scripture2 ! full pro( ( x is f\nd 9 ! fact t ea* successive doctr9e ( !ology is b\nd up ) x1 & ) x /&s or falls4 ,! ,tr9ity is rational because x expla9s ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce z well z ,*ri/ian doctr9e4 7c7 ,ev5 ?\gh !re 7 no ord]ly arrangem5t ( ^! facts1 ei!r 9 nature or 9 ,scripture1 an accurate sy/ematiz+ ( !m by ! human m9d w\ld n !re=e be prov$ impossible1 unless a pr9ciple 7 assum$ :i* w\ld %[ all physical sci5ce to be equally impossible4 ,a/ronomy & geology are con/ruct$ by putt+ toge!r multitud9\s facts :i* at fir/ sight seem to h no ord]4 ,s ) !ology4 ,& yet1 al?\gh revelation does n pres5t to u a dogmatic sy/em ready-made1 a dogmatic sy/em is n only implicitly conta9$ !re91 b p>ts ( ! sy/em are wr\ght out 9 ! epi/les ( ! ,new ,te/am5t1 z = example 9 ,rom4 #e3ab-ai2 #a ,cor4 #ae3c1 #d2 #h3f2 #a ,tim4 #c3af2 ,heb4 #f3a1 #b4 ,we may illu/rate ! con/ruction ( !ology f ! dissect$ map1 two pieces ( :i* a fa!r puts toge!r1 leav+ 8 *ild to put toge!r ! re/4 ,or we may illu/rate f ! physical univ]se1 :i* to ! un?9k+ reveals little ( its ord]4 8,nature makes no f5ces40 ,"o ?+ seems to glide into ano!r4 ,x is man's bus9ess to di/+ui% & classify & comb9e4 ,orig53 8,god gives u tru? 9 s+le ?reads1 :i* we mu/ weave into a f9i%$ texture40 ,&rew ,full] said ( ! doctr9es ( !ology t 8!y are unit$ toge!r l *a9-%ot1 s t1 :i*ev] "o ent]s ! he>t1 ! o!rs mu/ c]ta9ly foll[40 ,george ,h]b]t3 8,oh t ,i knew h[ all ?y lights comb9e1 ,& ! configuration ( _! glory2 ,see+ n only h[ ea* v]se do? %9e1 ,b all ! con/ellations ( ! /ory60 ,scripture h9ts at ! possibilities ( comb9ation1 9 ,rom4 #e3ab-ai1 ) its gr\p+ ( ! facts ( s9 & salvation ab\t ! two p]sons1 ,adam & ,*ri/2 9 ,rom4 #d3bd1 #be1 ) its l9k+ ( ! resurrection ( ,*ri/ & our ju/ification2 9 #a ,cor4 #c3f1 ) its indication ( ! relations betwe5 ! ,fa!r & ,*ri/2 9 #a ,tim4 #c3af1 ) its poetical summ>y ( ! facts ( r$emption 7see ,comm5t>ies ( ,de,wette1 ,mey]1 ,fairbairn72 9 ,heb4 #f3a1 #b1 ) its /atem5t ( ! fir/ pr9ciples ( ! ,*ri/ian fai?4 ,god's furni%+ ( concrete facts 9 !ology1 :i* we ourselves are left to sy/ematize1 is 9 complete accordance ) 8 me?od ( proc$ure ) reg>d to ! developm5t ( o!r sci5ces4 ,see ,m>t9eau1 ,essays1 #a3bi1 #dj2 ,am4 ,!ol4 ,rev41 #ahei3aja-abf--;art4 on ! ,idea1 ,s\rces & ,uses ( ,*ri/ian ,!ology4 ,,iv4 ,necessity ( ,!ology4 ,! necessity ( !ology has its gr\nds3 7a7 ,9 ! organiz+ in/9ct ( ! human m9d4 ,?is organiz+ pr9ciple is a "p ( our con/itution4 ,! m9d _c endure confusion or app>5t contradiction 9 kn[n facts4 ,! t5d5cy to h>monize & unify its k appe>s z soon z ! m9d becomes reflective2 j 9 proportion to its end[m5ts & culture does ! impulse to sy/ematize & =mulate increase4 ,?is is true ( all dep>tm5ts ( human inquiry1 b x is peculi>ly true ( our k ( ,god4 ,s9ce ! tru? ) reg>d to ,god is ! mo/ important ( all1 !ology meets ! deepe/ want ( man's rational nature4 ,!ology is a rational necessity4 ,if all exi/+ !ological sy/ems 7 de/roy$ to-day1 new sy/ems w\ld rise to-morr[4 ,s inevitable is ! op]ation ( ?is law1 t ^? :o mo/ decry !ology %[ nev]!less t !y h made a !ology = !mselves1 & (t5 "o suffici5tly meagre & blund]+4 ,ho/ility to !ology1 :]e x does n orig9ate 9 mi/ak5 fe>s = ! corruption ( ,god's tru? or 9 a naturally illogical /ructure ( m9d1 (t5 proce$s f a lic5se ( speculation :i* _c brook ! re/ra9ts ( a complete ,scriptural sy/em4 ,presid5t ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,e man has z mu* !ology z he c hold40 ,consci\sly or unconsci\sly1 we philosophize1 z naturally z we speak prose4 8,se moqu] de la philosophie c'e/ vraim5t philosoph]40 ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #ba--8;,*ri/ianity became metaphysical1 only because man is rational4 ,?is rationality means t he mu/ attempt #8to give acc\nt ( ?+s1' z ,plato said1 #8because he 0 a man1 n m]ely because he 0 a ,greek4' 0 ,m5 (t5 d5\nce sy/ematic !ology1 :ile !y extol ! sci5ces ( matt]4 ,has ,god !n left only ! facts ) reg>d to himself 9 s unrelat$ a /ate t man _c put !m toge!r8 ,all o!r sci5ces are valuable only z !y conta9 or promote ! k ( ,god4 ,if x is praisewor?y to classify beetles1 "o sci5ce may be all[$ to reason conc]n+ ,god & ! s\l4 ,9 speak+ ( ,s*ell+1 ,royce1 ,_s ( ,mod]n ,philosophy1 #agc1 satirically exhorts u3 8,tru/ y\r g5ius2 foll[ y\r noble he>t2 *ange y\r doctr9e :5ev] y\r he>t *anges1 & *ange y\r he>t (t51--su* is ! practical cre$ ( ! romantici/s40 ,rit*ie1 ,d>w9 & ,hegel1 #c--8;,j ^? p]sons :o disclaim metaphysics are sometimes mo/ apt to be infect$ ) ! disease !y pr(ess to abhor--& n to "k :5 !y h x40 ,see ,%$d1 ,disc\rses & ,essays1 #bg-eb2 ,murphy1 ,sci5tific ,bases ( ,fai?1 #aie-aii4 7b7 ,9 ! relation ( sy/ematic tru? to ! developm5t ( "*4 ,tru? ?or\ghly dige/$ is ess5tial to ! gr[? ( ,*ri/ian "* 9 ! individual & 9 ! *ur*4 ,all k ( ,god has its influ5ce ^u "*1 b mo/ ( all ! k ( spiritual facts 9 _! relations4 ,!ology _c1 z has sometimes be5 object$1 dead5 ! religi\s affections1 s9ce x only draws out f _! s\rces & puts into rational connection ) ea* o!r ! tru?s :i* are be/ adapt$ to n\ri% ! religions affections4 ,on ! o!r h&1 ! /ronge/ ,*ri/ians are ^? :o h ! firme/ grasp ^u ! great doctr9es ( ,*ri/ianity2 ! h]oic ages ( ! *ur* are ^? :i* h witness$ mo/ consi/5tly to !m2 ! piety t c be injur$ by ! sy/ematic exhibition ( !m mu/ be weak1 or my/ical1 or mi/ak54 ,"s k is necess>y to conv]sion--at lea/1 k ( s9 & k ( a ,savior2 & ! putt+ toge!r ( ^! two great tru?s is a beg9n+ ( !ology4 ,all subsequ5t gr[? ( "* is condition$ ^u ! increase ( ?is k4 ,col4 #a3aj-- omit 8increas+ by ! k ( ,god0--! in/rum5tal dative repres5ts ! k ( ,god z ! dew or ra9 :i* nurtures ! gr[? ( ! plant2 cf4 #c ,pet4 #c3ah--8;gr[ 9 ! grace & k ( our ,"l & ,savior ,jesus ,*ri/40 ,= texts :i* repres5t tru? z n\ri%m5t1 see ,j]4 #c3ae--8;fe$ y ) k & und]/&+02 ,mat4 #d3d--8,man %all n live by bread alone1 b by e ^w t proce$e? out ( ! m\? ( ,god02 #a ,cor4 #c3a1 #b--8;babes 9 ,*ri/ 444 ,i f$ y ) milk1 n ) meat02 ,heb4 #e3ad--8;b solid food is = full-gr[n m540 ,*ri/ian "* re/s ^u ,*ri/ian tru? z its f\ndation2 see #a ,cor4 #c3aj-ae--8;,i laid a f\ndation1 & ano!r builde? !reon40 ,see ,dorus ,cl>ke1 ,say+ ! ,cate*ism2 ,simon1 on ,*ri/ ,doct4 & ,life1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,july1 #ahhd3dcc-dci4 ,ignorance is ! "m ( sup]/ition1 n ( devotion4 ,talbot ,w4 ,*amb]s3--8,doctr9e )\t duty is a tree )\t fruits2 duty )\t doctr9e is a tree )\t roots40 ,*ri/ian morality is a fruit :i* gr[s only f ! tree ( ,*ri/ian doctr9e4 ,we _c long keep ! fruits ( fai? aft] we h cut d[n ! tree ^u :i* !y h gr[n4 ,balf\r1 ,f\ndations ( ,belief1 #hb--8,naturali/ic virtue is p>asitic1 & :5 ! ho/ p]i%es1 ! p>asite p]i%es also4 ,virtue )\t religion w die40 ,kidd1 ,social ,evolution1 #bad--8;,because ! fruit survives = a "t :5 remov$ f ! tree1 & ev5 mell[s & rip5s1 %all we say t x is indep5d5t ( ! tree80 ,! twelve mann] ( fruits on ! ,*ri/mas-tree are only tack$ on1--!y nev] grew !re1 & !y c nev] reproduce _! k9d4 ,! )]$ apple swells out "u ! exhau/$ receiv]1 b x w g back aga9 to its =m] %runk5 =m2 s ! self-righte\sness ( ^? :o get out ( ! atmosph]e ( ,*ri/ & h no div9e ideal ) :i* to comp>e !mselves4 ,w4 ,m4 ,lisle3 8,x is ! mi/ake & disa/] ( ! ,*ri/ian _w t effects are s\ght in/ead ( causes40 ,george ,a4 ,gordon1 ,*ri/ ( ,to-day1 #bh--8,)\t ! hi/orical ,*ri/ & p]sonal love = t ,*ri/1 ! broad !ology ( our day w r$uce itself to a dream1 p[]less to r\se a sleep+ *ur*40 7c7 ,9 ! importance to ! prea*] ( def9ite & j views ( ,*ri/ian doctr9e4 ,8 *ief intellectual qualification mu/ be ! p[] cle>ly & compreh5sively to conceive1 & accurately & p[]fully to express1 ! tru?4 ,he c be ! ag5t ( ! ,holy ,_s 9 conv]t+ & sanctify+ m51 only z he c wield 8! sword ( ! ,_s1 :i* is ! ^w ( ,god0 7,eph4 #f3ag71 or1 9 o!r language1 only z he c impress tru? ^u ! m9ds & consci5ces ( 8 he>]s4 ,no?+ m c]ta9ly nullifies 8 ef=ts ?an confusion & inconsi/5cy 9 8 /atem5ts ( doctr9e4 ,8 object is to replace obscure & errone\s conceptions among 8 he>]s by ^? :i* are correct & vivid4 ,he _c d ?is )\t kn[+ ! facts ) reg>d to ,god 9 _! relations--kn[+ !m1 9 %ort1 z p>ts ( a sy/em4 ,) ?is tru? he is put 9 tru/4 ,to mutilate x or misrepres5t x1 is n only s9 aga9/ ! ,reveal] ( x1--x may prove ! ru9 ( m5's s\ls4 ,! be/ safegu>d aga9/ su* mutilation or misrepres5tation1 is ! dilig5t /udy ( ! sev]al doctr9es ( ! fai? 9 _! relations to "o ano!r1 & especially to ! c5tral !me ( !ology1 ! p]son & "w ( ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,! m ref9$ & reflective ! age1 ! m x requires reasons = feel+4 ,imag9ation1 z ex]cis$ 9 poetry & eloqu5ce & z exhibit$ 9 politics or w>1 is n less /rong ?an ( old1--x is only m rational4 ,notice ! progress f 8,buncombe01 9 legislative & =5sic oratory1 to s5sible & logical address4 ,bassanio 9 ,%akespe>e's ,m]*ant ( ,v5ice1 #a3a3aac--8;,gratiano speaks an inf9ite deal ( no?+4444 ,8 reasons are z two gra9s ( :eat hid 9 two bu%els ( *aff40 ,s 9 pulpit oratory1 m]e ,scripture quotation & f]vid appeal are no long] suffici5t4 ,z well be a h[l+ d]vi%1 z to indulge 9 w9dy declamation4 ,?\ght is ! /aple ( prea*+4 ,feel+ mu/ be r\s$1 b only by br++ m5 to 8! k ( ! tru?0 7#b ,tim4 #b3be74 ,! prea*] mu/ furni% ! basis = feel+ by produc+ intellig5t conviction4 ,he mu/ in/ruct be=e he c move4 ,if ! object ( ! prea*] is fir/ to "k ,god1 & secondly to make ,god kn[n1 !n ! /udy ( !ology is absolutely necess>y to 8 success4 ,%all ! physician practice m$ic9e )\t /udy ( physiology1 or ! lawy] practice law )\t /udy ( jurisprud5ce8 ,pr(essor ,blackie3 8,"o may z well expect to make a great patriot out ( a f5c+-ma/]1 z to make a great orator out ( a m]e rhetorician40 ,! prea*] ne$s doctr9e1 to prev5t 8 be+ a m]e b>rel-organ1 play+ ov] & ov] ! same tunes4 ,john ,h5ry ,newman3 8,! false prea*] is "o :o has to say some?+2 ! true prea*] is "o :o has some?+ to say40 ,spurgeon1 ,autobiography1 #a3afg--8;,con/ant *ange ( cre$ is sure loss4 ,if a tree has to be tak5 up two or ?ree times a ye>1 y w n ne$ to build a v l>ge l(t 9 :i* to /ore ! apples4 ,:5 p are %ift+ _! doctr9al pr9ciples1 !y d n br+ =? mu* fruit4444 ,we %all nev] h great prea*]s till we h great div9es4 ,y _c build a man ( w> out ( a currant-bu%1 nor c great s\l-mov+ prea*]s be =m$ out ( sup]ficial /ud5ts40 ,illu/rate ! h>mfulness ( ignorant & errone\s prea*+1 by ! mi/ake 9 a physician's prescription2 by ! wrong trail at ,lake ,placid :i* l$ a/ray ^? asc5d+ ,:iteface2 by ! s[+ ( acorns ^: crop 0 ga!r$ only aft] a hundr$ ye>s4 ,slight div]g5ces f correct doctr9e on our "p may be ru9\sly exagg]at$ 9 ^? :o come aft] u4 ,?\gh ! mo?-mill] has no tee?1 its (fspr+ has4 #b ,tim4 #b3b--8;,& ! ?+s :i* ?\ ha/ he>d f me among _m witnesses1 ! same commit ?\ to fai?ful m51 :o %all be able to tea* o!rs also40 7d7 ,9 ! intimate connection betwe5 correct doctr9e & ! safety & aggressive p[] ( ! *ur*4 ,! safety & progress ( ! *ur* is dep5d5t ^u h] 8hold+ ! patt]n ( s\nd words0 7#b ,tim4 #a3ac71 & s]v+ z 8pill> & gr\nd ( ! tru?0 7#a ,tim4 #c3ae74 ,defective und]/&+ ( ! tru? results soon] or lat] 9 defects ( organization1 ( op]ation1 & ( life4 ,?or\gh compreh5sion ( ,*ri/ian tru? z an organiz$ sy/em furni%es1 on ! o!r h&1 n only an invaluable def5se aga9/ h]esy & immorality1 b also an indisp5sable /imulus & in/rum5t 9 aggressive labor = ! _w's conv]sion4 ,! cre$s ( ,*ri/5dom h n orig9at$ 9 m]e speculative curiosity & logical hair-splitt+4 ,!y are /atem5ts ( doctr9e 9 :i* ! attack$ & imp]il$ *ur* has s\ght to express ! tru? :i* con/itutes h] v life4 ,^? :o d]ide ! e>ly cre$s h small conception ( ! intellectual acum5 & ! moral e>ne/ness :i* w5t to ! mak+ ( !m4 ,! cre$s ( ! ?ird & f\r? c5turies embody ! results ( controv]sies :i* exhau/$ ! possibilities ( h]esy ) reg>d to ! ,tr9ity & ! p]son ( ,*ri/1 & :i* set up b>s aga9/ false doctr9e to ! end ( "t4 ,mahaffy3 8,:at conv]t$ ! _w 0 n ! example ( ,*ri/'s life1--x 0 ! dogma ( 8 dea?40 ,col]idge3 8,he :o does n )/&1 has no /&+ gr\nd ( 8 own40 ,mrs4 ,br[n+3 8,entire intellectual tol]ation is ! m>k ( ^? :o believe no?+40 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #cfj-cfb--8;,a doctr9e is b a precept 9 ! /yle ( a proposition2 & a precept is b a doctr9e 9 ! =m ( a comm&4444 ,!ology is ,god's g>d52 its trees are trees ( 8 plant+2 & #8all ! trees ( ! ,"l are full ( sap' 7,ps4 #ajd3af740 ,bose1 ,ecum5ical ,c\ncils3 8,a cre$ is n ca?olic because a c\ncil ( _m or ( few bi%ops decre$ x1 b because x expresses ! common conviction ( entire g5]ations ( m5 & wom5 :o turn$ _! und]/&+ ( ! ,new ,te/am5t into ^? =ms ( words40 ,dorn]3 8,! cre$s are ! precipitate ( ! religi\s consci\sness ( mighty m5 & times40 ,fo/]1 ,*ri/4 ,life & ,!ol41 #afb--8;,x ord9>ily requires ! %ock ( "s great ev5t to />tle m5 into cle> appreh5sion & cry/allization ( _! sub/antial belief4 ,su* a %ock 0 giv5 by ! r\gh & co>se doctr9e ( ,arius1 ^u :i* ! conclusion arriv$ at 9 ! ,c\ncil ( ,nice foll[$ z rapidly z 9 *ill$ wat] ! cry/als ( ice w sometimes =m :5 ! conta9+ vessel receives a bl[40 ,balf\r1 ,f\ndations ( ,belief1 #bhg--8,! cre$s 7 n explanations1 b r d5ials t ! ,arian & ,gno/ic explanations 7 suffici5t1 & decl>ations t !y irrem$iably impov]i%$ ! idea ( ! ,godhead4 ,!y insi/$ on pres]v+ t idea 9 all its inexplicable fulness40 ,d5ny1 ,/udies 9 ,!ology1 #aib--8,pagan philosophies tri$ to capture ! *ur* = _! own ends1 & to turn x into a s*ool4 ,9 self-def5se ! *ur* 0 compell$ to become some:at ( a s*ool on its own acc\nt4 ,x _h to ass]t its facts2 x _h to def9e its ideas2 x _h to int]pret 9 its own way ^? facts :i* m5 7 mis9t]pret+40 ,pr(essor ,h[>d ,osgood3 8,a cre$ is l a backbone4 ,a man does n ne$ to we> 8 backbone 9 front ( him2 b he mu/ h a backbone1 & a /raight "o1 or he w be a flexible if n a humpback$ ,*ri/ian40 ,yet we mu/ rememb] t cre$s are cr$ita1 & n cr$5da2 hi/orical /atem5ts ( :at ! *ur* has believ$1 n infallible prescriptions ( :at ! *ur* mu/ believe4 ,george ,dana ,bo>dman1 ,! ,*ur*1 #ih--8;,cre$s are apt to become cages40 ,s*urman1 ,agno/icism1 #aea--8,! cre$s 7 meant to be def5sive =tifications ( religion2 alas1 t !y %\ld h sometimes turn$ _! artill]y aga9/ ! citadel itself40 ,t4 ,h4 ,gre53 8,we are told t we mu/ be loyal to ! beliefs ( ! ,fa!rs4 ,yes1 b :o kn[s :at ! ,fa!rs believe n[80 ,george ,a4 ,gordon1 ,*ri/ ( ,to-day1 #fj--8,! assumption t ! ,holy ,_s is n conc]n$ 9 ! developm5t ( !ological ?\ght1 nor manife/ 9 ! intellectual evolution ( mank9d1 is ! sup]lative h]esy ( our g5]ation4444 ,! metaphysics ( ,jesus are absolutely ess5tial to 8 e?ics4444 ,if 8 ?\ght is a dream1 8 endeavor = man is a delusion40 ,see ,s*aff1 ,cre$s ( ,*ri/5dom1 #a3h1 #ae1 #af2 ,/orrs1 ,div4 ,orig9 ( ,*ri/ianity1 #aba2 ,ian ,macl>5 7,john ,watson71 ,cure ( ,s\ls1 #aeb2 ,fr$]ick ,h>rison1 9 ,=tnightly ,rev41 ,jan4 #ahhi4 7e7 ,9 ! direct & indirect injunctions ( ,scripture4 ,! ,scripture urges ^u u ! ?or\gh & compreh5sive /udy ( ! tru? 7,john #e3ci1 m>g41--8,se>* ! ,scriptures071 ! comp>+ & h>moniz+ ( its diff]5t p>ts 7#a ,cor4 #b3ac--8;comp>+ spiritual ?+s ) spiritual071 ! ga!r+ ( all ab\t ! great c5tral fact ( revelation 7,col4 #a3bg--8:i* is ,*ri/ 9 y1 ! hope ( glory071 ! prea*+ ( x 9 its :ol5ess z well z 9 its due proportions 7#b ,tim4 #d3b--8,prea* ! ^w074 ,! m9i/] ( ! ,gospel is call$ 8a scribe :o ha? be5 made a disciple to ! k+dom ( heav50 7,mat4 #ac3eb72 ! 8pa/ors0 ( ! *ur*es are at ! same "t to be 8tea*]s0 7,eph4 #d3aa72 ! bi%op mu/ be 8apt to tea*0 7#a ,tim4 #c3b71 8h&l+ aright ! ^w ( tru?0 7#b ,tim4 #b3ae71 8hold+ to ! fai?ful ^w :i* is accord+ to ! tea*+1 t he may be able bo? to exhort 9 ! s\nd doctr9e & to convict ! ga9say]s0 7,tit4 #a3i74 ,z a means ( in/ruct+ ! *ur* & ( secur+ progress 9 8 own und]/&+ ( ,*ri/ian tru?1 x is well = ! pa/or to prea* regul>ly ea* mon? a doctr9al s]mon1 & to exp\nd 9 c\rse ! pr9cipal articles ( ! fai?4 ,! treatm5t ( doctr9e 9 ^! s]mons %\ld be simple en\gh to be compreh5sible by intellig5t y\?2 x %\ld be made vivid & int]e/+ by ! help ( brief illu/rations2 & at lea/ "o-?ird ( ea* s]mon %\ld be devot$ to ! practical applications ( ! doctr9e prop\nd$4 ,see ,jona?an ,edw>ds's s]mon on ! ,importance ( ! ,k ( ,div9e ,tru?1 9 ,works1 #d3a-ae4 ,! actual s]mons ( ,edw>ds1 h[ev]1 are n models ( doctr9al prea*+ = our g5]ation4 ,!y are too s*ola/ic 9 =m1 too metaphysical = sub/ance2 !re is too little ( ,scripture & too little ( illu/ration4 ,! doctr9al prea*+ ( ! ,engli% ,puritans 9 a simil> mann] address$ itself almo/ :olly to adults4 ,! prea*+ ( our ,"l on ! o!r h& 0 adapt$ also to *ildr54 ,no pa/or %\ld c\nt himself fai?ful1 :o p]mits 8 "y p to gr[ up )\t regul> in/ruction f ! pulpit 9 ! :ole circle ( ,*ri/ian doctr9e4 ,%akespe>e1 ,k4 ,h5ry ,,vi1 #bnd "p1 #d3g--8;,ignorance is ! curse ( ,god2 k ! w+ :]e) we fly to heav540 ,v4 ,relation ( ,!ology to ,religion4 ,!ology & religion are relat$ to ea* o!r z effects1 9 diff]5t sph]es1 ( ! same cause4 ,z !ology is an effect produc$ 9 ! sph]e ( sy/ematic ?\ght by ! facts respect+ ,god & ! univ]se1 s religion is an effect :i* ^! same facts produce 9 ! sph]e ( individual & collective life4 ,) reg>d to ! t]m 8religion01 notice3 #a4 ,d]ivation4 7a7 ,! d]ivation f religre1 8to b9d back0 7man to ,god71 is negativ$ by ! au?ority ( ,cic]o & ( ! be/ mod]n etymologi/s2 by ! difficulty1 on ?is hypo!sis1 ( expla9+ su* =ms z religio1 relig5s2 & by ! necessity1 9 t case1 ( presuppos+ a full] k ( s9 & r$emption ?an 0 common to ! anci5t _w4 7b7 ,! m correct d]ivation is f relegre1 8to g ov] aga910 8c>efully to pond]40 ,its orig9al mean+ is !re=e 8rev]5t obs]vance0 7( duties due to ! gods74 ,= advocacy ( ! d]ivation ( religio1 z mean+ 8b9d+ duty10 f religre1 see ,lange1 ,dogmatik1 #a3ahe-aif4 ,?is d]ivation 0 fir/ propos$ by ,lactantius1 ,in/4 ,div41 #d3bh1 a ,*ri/ian writ]4 ,to meet ! objection t ! =m religio seems d]iv$ f a v]b ( ! ?ird conjugation1 ,lange cites rebellio1 f rebellre1 & optio1 f optre4 ,b we reply t ^! v]bs ( ! fir/ conjugation1 l _m o!rs1 are probably d]iv$ f obsolete v]bs ( ! ?ird conjugation4 ,= ! d]ivation favor$ 9 ! text1 see ,curtius1 ,grie*is*e ,etymologie1 #ete ,aufl41 #cfd2 ,fick1 ,v]gl4 ,wrt]b4 d] indog]4 ,spr41 #b3bbg2 ,vanicek1 ,gr4-,lat4 ,etym4 ,wrt]b41 #b3hbi2 ,&rews1 ,lat9 ,lexicon1 9 voce2 ,nitzs*1 ,sy/em ( ,*ri/4 ,doctr9e1 #g2 ,van ,oo/]zee1 ,dogmatics1 #ge-gg2 ,philippi1 ,glaub5slehre1 #a3f2 ,kahnis1 ,dogmatik1 #c3ah2 ,m5zies1 ,hi/ory ( ,religion1 #aa2 ,max ,mll]1 ,natural ,religion1 lect4 #b4 #b4 ,false ,conceptions4 7a7 ,religion is n1 z ,hegel decl>$1 a k9d ( kn[+2 = x w\ld !n be only an incomplete =m ( philosophy1 & ! measure ( k 9 ea* case w\ld be ! measure ( piety4 ,9 a sy/em ( ideali/ic pan!ism1 l t ( ,hegel1 ,god is ! subject ( religion z well z its object4 ,religion is ,god's kn[+ ( himself ?r\gh ! human consci\sness4 ,hegel did n utt]ly ignore o!r elem5ts 9 religion4 8,feel+1 intuition1 & fai? belong to x10 he said1 8& m]e cognition is "o-sid$40 ,yet he 0 always look+ = ! movem5t ( ?\ght 9 all =ms ( life2 ,god & ! univ]se 7 b developm5ts ( ! primordial idea4 8,:at k is wor? kn[+10 he ask$1 8if ,god is unkn[able8 ,to "k ,god is et]nal life1 & ?9k+ is also true wor%ip40 ,hegel's error 0 9 reg>d+ life z a process ( ?\ght1 r ?an 9 reg>d+ ?\ght z a process ( life4 ,"h 0 ! reason = ! bitt]ness betwe5 ,hegel & ,s*lei]ma*]4 ,hegel rightly consid]$ t feel+ mu/ become intellig5t be=e x is truly religi\s1 b he did n recognize ! supreme importance ( love 9 a !ological sy/em4 ,he gave ev5 less place to ! w ?an he gave to ! emotions1 & he fail$ to see t ! k ( ,god ( :i* ,scripture speaks is a kn[+1 n ( ! intellect alone1 b ( ! :ole man1 includ+ ! affectional & volunt>y nature4 ,goe!3 8,h[ c a man come to "k himself8 ,nev] by ?9k+1 b by do+4 ,try to d y\r duty1 & y w "k at once :at y are wor?4 ,y _c play ! flute by bl[+ alone1--y mu/ use y\r f+]s40 ,s we c nev] come to "k ,god by ?9k+ alone4 ,john #g3ag--8;,if any man wille? to d 8 w1 he w "k ( ! tea*+1 :e!r x is ( ,god40 ,! ,gno/ics1 ,/apf]1 ,h5ry ,,viii1 all %[ t !re may be mu* !ological k )\t true religion4 ,*ill+wor?'s maxim1 8,! ,bible only1 ! religion ( ,prote/ants10 is inadequate & inaccurate2 = ! ,bible1 )\t fai?1 love1 & ob$i5ce1 may become a feti* & a sn>e3 ,john #e3ci1dj--8,ye se>* ! ,scriptures1 444 & ye w n come to me1 t ye may h life40 ,see ,/]rett1 ,/udies 9 ,hegel's ,philosophy ( ,religion2 ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #ei1 #fj1 #dab1 #ebe-ecf1 #ehi1 #fej2 ,morell1 ,hi/4 ,philos41 #dgf1 #dgg2 ,ham]ton1 ,intel4 ,life1 #bad2 ,bib4 ,sac41 #i3cgd4 7b7 ,religion is n1 z ,s*lei]ma*] held1 ! m]e feel+ ( dep5d5ce2 = su* feel+ ( dep5d5ce is n religi\s1 unless ex]cis$ t[>d ,god & accompani$ by moral ef=t4 ,9 ,g]man !ology1 ,s*lei]ma*] con/itutes ! transition f ! old rationalism to ! evangelical fai?4 8,l ,laz>us1 ) ! grave clo!s ( a pan!i/ic philosophy entangl+ 8 /eps10 yet ) a ,moravian exp]i5ce ( ! life ( ,god 9 ! s\l1 he bas$ religion ^u ! inn] c]ta9ties ( ,*ri/ian feel+4 ,b1 z ,pr9cipal ,fairbairn rem>ks1 8,emotion is impot5t unless x speaks out ( conviction2 & :]e conviction is1 !re w be emotion :i* is pot5t to p]suade40 ,if ,*ri/ianity is religi\s feel+ alone1 !n !re is no ess5tial diff]5ce betwe5 x & o!r religions1 = all alike are products ( ! religi\s s5tim5t4 ,b ,*ri/ianity is di/+ui%$ f o!r religions by its peculi> religi\s conceptions4 ,doctr9e prec$es life1 & ,*ri/ian doctr9e1 n m]e religi\s feel+1 is ! cause ( ,*ri/ianity z a di/9ctive religion4 ,?\gh fai? beg9s 9 feel+1 moreov]1 x does n end !re4 ,we see ! wor?lessness ( m]e feel+ 9 ! transi5t emotions ( !atre-go]s1 & 9 ! occasional ph5om5a ( revivals4 ,sabati]1 ,philos4 ,relig41 #bg1 adds to ,s*lei]ma*]'s passive elem5t ( dep5d5ce1 ! active elem5t ( pray]4 ,kaftan1 ,dogmatik1 #aj--8,s*lei]ma*] reg>ds ,god z ! ,s\rce ( our be+1 b =gets t he is also our ,end40 ,fell[%ip & progress are z important elem5ts 9 religion z is dep5d5ce2 & fell[%ip mu/ come be=e progress--su* fell[%ip z presupposes p>don & life4 ,s*lei]ma*] app>5tly believ$ 9 nei!r a p]sonal ,god nor 8 own p]sonal immortality2 see 8 ,life & ,lett]s1 #b3gg-ij2 ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy ( ,religion1 #b3ceg4 ,*>les ,hodge comp>es him to a ladd] 9 a pit--a good ?+ = ^? :o wi% to get out1 b n = ^? :o wi% to get 94 ,dorn]3 8,! ,moravian bro!rhood 0 8 "m2 ,greece 0 8 nurse40 ,on ,s*lei]ma*]1 see ,h]zog1 ,real5cyclopdie1 9 voce2 ,bib4 ,sac41 #aheb3cge2 #ahhc3ecd2 ,liddon1 ,elem5ts ( ,religion1 lect4 ,i2 ,ebr>d1 ,dogmatik1 #a3ad2 ,julius ,mll]1 ,doctr9e ( ,s91 #a3age2 ,fi%]1 ,sup]nat4 ,orig9 ( ,*ri/ianity1 #efc-egj2 ,caird1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #afj-ahf4 7c7 ,religion is n1 z ,kant ma9ta9$1 morality or moral action2 = morality is con=mity to an ab/ract law ( "r1 :ile religion is ess5tially a relation to a p]son1 f :om ! s\l receives bless+ & to :om x surr5d]s itself 9 love & ob$i5ce4 ,kant1 ,kritik d] praktis*5 ,v]nunft1 ,bes*luss3 8,i "k ( b two beautiful ?+s1 ! />ry heav5s above my head1 & ! s5se ( duty )9 my he>t40 ,b ! m]e s5se ( duty (t5 di/resses4 ,we object to ! ^w 8obey0 z ! imp]ative ( religion1 because 7#a7 x makes religion a matt] ( ! w only2 7#b7 w presupposes affection2 7#c7 love is n subject to w2 7#d7 x makes ,god all law1 & no grace2 7#e7 x makes ! ,*ri/ian a s]vant only1 n a fri5d2 cf4 ,john #ae3ae--8,no long] d ,i call y s]vants 444 b ,i h call$ y fri5ds0--a relation n ( s]vice b ( love 7,we/cott1 ,bib4 ,com41 9 loco74 ,! voice t speaks is ! voice ( love1 r ?an ! voice ( law4 ,we object also to ,mat!w ,arnold's def9ition3 8,religion is e?ics height5$1 enk9dl$1 lit up by feel+2 morality t\*$ ) emotion40 ,?is leaves out ( view ! receptive elem5t 9 religion1 z well z its relation to a p]sonal ,god4 ,a tru] /atem5t w\ld be t religion is morality t[>d ,god1 z morality is religion t[>d man4 ,b[ne1 ,philos4 ( ,!ism1 #bea--8,morality t goes beyond m]e consci5ti\sness mu/ h rec\rse to religion02 see ,lotze1 ,philos4 ( ,religion1 #abh-adb4 ,goe!3 8,unqualifi$ activity1 ( :atev] k9d1 leads at la/ to bankruptcy02 see also ,pfleid]]1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #a3fe-fi2 ,%$d1 ,s]mons to ! ,natural ,man1 #bdd-bdf2 ,liddon1 ,elem5ts ( ,religion1 #ai4 #c4 ,ess5tial ,idea4 ,religion 9 its ess5tial idea is a life 9 ,god1 a life liv$ 9 recognition ( ,god1 9 communion ) ,god1 & "u control ( ! indwell+ ,_s ( ,god4 ,s9ce x is a life1 x _c be describ$ z consi/+ solely 9 ! ex]cise ( any "o ( ! p[]s ( intellect1 affection1 or w4 ,z physical life involves ! unity & cop]ation ( all ! organs ( ! body1 s religion1 or spiritual life1 involves ! unit$ work+ ( all ! p[]s ( ! s\l4 ,to feel+1 h[ev]1 we mu/ assign ! logical priority1 s9ce holy affection t[>d ,god1 imp>t$ 9 reg5]ation1 is ! condition ( truly kn[+ ,god & ( truly s]v+ him4 ,see ,godet1 on ! ,ultimate ,design ( ,man--8,god 9 man1 & man 9 ,god0--9 ,pr9ceton ,rev41 ,nov4 #ahhj2 ,pfleid]]1 ,die ,religion1 #e-gi1 & ,religionsphilosophie1 #bee--,religion is 8,sa*e des ganz5 ,gei/esleb5s03 ,crane1 ,religion ( ,to-morr[1 #d--8,religion is ! p]sonal influ5ce ( ! imman5t ,god02 ,/]rett1 ,reason & ,au?ority 9 ,religion1 #ca1 #cb--8,religion is ! reciprocal relation or communion ( ,god & man1 involv+ 7#a7 revelation1 7#b7 fai?02 ,dr4 ,j4 ,w4 ,a4 ,/ew>t3 8,religion is fell[%ip ) ,god02 ,pascal3 8,piety is ,god s5sible to ! he>t02 ,rits*l1 ,ju/if4 & ,reconcil41 #ac--8;,*ri/ianity is an ellipse ) two foci--,*ri/ z ,r$eem] & ,*ri/ z ,k+1 ,*ri/ = u & ,*ri/ 9 u1 r$emption & morality1 religion & e?ics02 ,kaftan1 ,dogmatik1 #h--8,! ,*ri/ian religion is 7#a7 ! k+dom ( ,god z a goal above ! _w1 to be atta9$ by moral developm5t "h1 & 7#b7 reconciliation ) ,god p]mitt+ atta9m5t ( ?is goal 9 spite ( our s9s4 ,*ri/ian !ology once gr\nd$ itself 9 man's natural k ( ,god2 we n[ />t ) religion1 i4 e41 t ,*ri/ian k ( ,god :i* we call fai?40 ,h]b]t ,sp5c]3 8,religion is an a priori !ory ( ! univ]se02 ,romanes1 ,?\ghts on ,religion1 #dc1 adds3 8:i* assumes intellig5t p]sonality z ! orig9at+ cause ( ! univ]se1 sci5ce deal+ ) ! ,h[1 ! ph5om5al process1 religion deal+ ) ! ,:o1 ! intellig5t ,p]sonality :o works ?r\gh ! process40 ,holl&1 9 ,lux ,mundi1 #bg--8,natural life is ! life 9 ,god :i* has n yet arriv$ at ?is recognition0--! recognition ( ! fact t ,god is 9 all ?+s--8x is n yet1 z su*1 religi\s2 444 ,religion is ! discov]y1 by ! son1 ( a ,fa!r :o is 9 all 8 works1 yet is di/9ct f !m all40 ,dewey1 ,psy*ology1 #bhc--8;,feel+ f9ds its absolutely univ]sal expression 9 religi\s emotion1 :i* is ! f9d+ or realization ( self 9 a completely realiz$ p]sonality :i* unites 9 itself tru?1 or ! complete unity ( ! relations ( all objects1 beauty or ! complete unity ( all ideal values1 & rightness or ! complete unity ( all p]sons4 ,! emotion :i* accompanies ! religi\s life is t :i* accompanies ! complete activity ( ourselves2 ! self is realiz$ & f9ds its true life 9 ,god40 ,upton1 ,hibb]t ,lectures1 #bfb--8;,e?ics is simply ! gr[+ insight into1 & ! ef=t to actualize 9 society1 ! s5se ( fundam5tal k9%ip & id5tity ( sub/ance 9 all m52 :ile religion is ! emotion & ! devotion :i* att5d ! realization 9 our self-consci\sness ( an inmo/ spiritual relation%ip aris+ out ( t unity ( sub/ance :i* con/itutes man ! true son ( ! et]nal ,fa!r40 ,see ,van ,oo/]zee1 ,dogmatics1 #ha-he2 ,julius ,mll]1 ,doct4 ,s91 #b3bbg2 ,nitzs*1 ,sy/4 ( ,*ri/4 ,doct41 #aj-bh2 ,lu?>dt1 ,fund4 ,tru?s1 #adg2 ,twe/51 ,dogmatik1 #a3ab4 #d4 ,inf]5ces4 ,f ?is def9ition ( religion x foll[s3 7a7 ,t 9 /rictness !re is b "o religion4 ,man is a religi\s be+1 inde$1 z hav+ ! capacity = ?is div9e life4 ,he is actually religi\s1 h[ev]1 only :5 he ent]s into ?is liv+ relation to ,god4 ,false religions are ! c>icatures :i* m5 giv5 to s91 or ! imag9ations :i* m5 grop+ aft] light1 =m ( ?is life ( ! s\l 9 ,god4 ,peabody1 ,*ri/ianity ! ,religion ( ,nature1 #ah--8;,if ,*ri/ianity be true1 x is n a religion1 b ! religion4 ,if ,judaism be also true1 x is s n z di/9ct f b z co9cid5t ) ,*ri/ianity1 ! "o religion to :i* x c be> only ! relation ( a "p to ! :ole4 ,if !re be portions ( tru? 9 o!r religi\s sy/ems1 !y are n portions ( o!r religions1 b portions ( ! "o religion :i* someh[ or o!r became incorporat$ ) fables & falsities40 ,john ,caird1 ,fund4 ,ideas ( ,*ri/ianity1 #a3be--8,y c nev] get at ! true idea or ess5ce ( religion m]ely by try+ to f9d out some?+ t is common to all religions2 & x is n ! l[] religions t expla9 ! high]1 b conv]sely ! high] religion expla9s all ! l[] religions40 ,george ,p4 ,fi%]3 8,! recognition ( c]ta9 elem5ts ( tru? 9 ! e?nic religions does n mean t ,*ri/ianity has defects :i* are to be repair$ by borr[+ f !m2 x only means t ! e?nic fai?s h 9 fragm5ts :at ,*ri/ianity has z a :ole4 ,comp>ative religion does n br+ to ,*ri/ianity new tru?2 x provides illu/rations ( h[ ,*ri/ian tru? meets human ne$s & aspirations1 & gives a full vision ( t :i* ! mo/ spiritual & gift$ among ! hea!n only dimly disc]n$40 ,dr4 ,c4 ,h4 ,p>khur/1 s]mon on ,prov]bs #bj3bg--8,! _s ( man is ! lamp ( ,jehovah0--8a lamp1 b n necess>ily light$2 a lamp t c be lit only by ! t\* ( a div9e flame0--man has naturally & univ]sally a capacity = religion1 b is by no means naturally & univ]sally religi\s4 ,all false religions h "s elem5t ( tru?2 o!rwise !y c\ld nev] h ga9$ or kept _! hold ^u mank9d4 ,we ne$ to recognize ^! elem5ts ( tru? 9 deal+ ) !m4 ,!re is "s silv] 9 a c\nt]feit doll>1 else x w\ld deceive no "o2 b ! ?9 wa%+ ( silv] ov] ! lead does n prev5t x f be+ bad money4 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #h--8,see ,paul's me?ods ( deal+ ) hea!n religion1 9 ,acts #ad ) gross paganism & 9 ,acts #ag ) its cultur$ =m4 ,he treats x ) sympa?y & ju/ice4 ,*ri/ian !ology has ! advantage ( walk+ 9 ! light ( ,god's self-manife/ation 9 ,*ri/1 :ile hea!n religions grope aft] ,god & wor%ip him 9 ignorance02 cf4 ,acts #ad3af--8,we 444 br+ y good tid+s1 t ye %\ld turn f ^! va9 ?+s unto a liv+ ,god02 #ag3bb--8;,i p]ceive t ye are m ?an usually rev]5t t[>d ! div9ities4444 ,:at !re=e ye wor%ip 9 ignorance1 ?is ,i set =? unto y40 ,mat!w ,arnold3 8,*ildr5 ( m56 ! unse5 ,p[] ^: eye ,=ev] do? accompany mank9d1 ,ha? look$ on no religion scornfully ,t man did ev] f9d4 ,:i* has n taught weak wills h[ mu* !y c8 ,:i* has n fall5 on ! dry he>t l ra98 ,:i* has n cri$ to sunk1 self-we>y man1 ,?\ mu/ be born aga980 ,*ri/ianity is absolutely exclusive1 because x is absolutely inclusive4 ,x is n an amalgamation ( o!r religions1 b x has 9 x all t is be/ & true/ 9 o!r religions4 ,x is ! :ite light t conta9s all ! color$ rays4 ,god may h made disclosures ( tru? outside ( ,judaism1 & did s 9 ,balaam & ,mel*is$ek1 9 ,confucius & ,socrates4 ,b :ile o!r religions h a relative excell5ce1 ,*ri/ianity is ! absolute religion t conta9s all excell5cies4 ,ma!son1 ,messages ( ! ,old ,religions1 #cbh-cdb--8;,*ri/ianity is reconciliation4 ,*ri/ianity includes ! aspiration ( ,egypt2 x sees1 9 ?is aspiration1 ,god 9 ! s\l 7,brahmanism72 recognizes ! evil p[] ( s9 ) ,p>seeism2 goes back to a pure beg9n+ l ,*9a2 surr5d]s itself to human bro!rhood l ,buddha2 gets all ?+s f )9 l ,judaism2 makes ! pres5t life beautiful l ,greece2 seeks a univ]sal k+dom l ,rome2 %[s a gr[? ( div9e life1 l ! ,teuton4 ,*ri/ianity is ! manifold wisdom ( ,god40 ,see also ,van ,oo/]zee1 ,dogmatics1 #hh-ic4 ,%akespe>e3 8,!re is "s s\l ( goodness 9 ?+s evil1 ,w\ld m5 obs]v+ly di/ill x out0 7b7 ,t ! cont5t ( religion is great] ?an t ( !ology4 ,! facts ( religion come )9 ! range ( !ology only s f> z !y c be def9itely conceiv$1 accurately express$ 9 language1 & br\ght into rational relation to ea* o!r4 ,?is pr9ciple enables u to def9e ! prop] limits ( religi\s fell[%ip4 ,x %\ld be z wide z is religion itself4 ,b x is important to rememb] :at religion is4 ,religion is n to be id5tifi$ ) ! capacity = religion4 ,nor c we reg>d ! p]v]sions & c>icatures ( religion z m]it+ our fell[%ip4 ,o!rwise we might be requir$ to h fell[%ip ) devil-wor%ip1 polygamy1 ?ugg]y1 & ! inquisition2 = all ^! h be5 dignifi$ ) ! "n ( religion4 ,true religion involves "s k1 h[ev] rudim5t>y1 ( ! true ,god1 ! ,god ( righte\sness2 "s s5se ( s9 z ! contra/ betwe5 human "* & ! div9e /&>d2 "s ca/+ ( ! s\l ^u div9e m]cy & a div9e way ( salvation1 9 place ( self-righte\s e>n+ ( m]it & reliance ^u "o's works & "o's record2 "s practical ef=t to realize e?ical pr9ciple 9 a pure life & 9 influ5ce ov] o!rs4 ,:]ev] ^! m>ks ( true religion appe>1 ev5 9 ,unit>ians1 ,romani/s1 ,jews or ,buddhi/s1 !re we recognize ! dem& = fell[%ip4 ,b we also attribute ^! g]ms ( true religion to ! inwork+ ( ! omnipres5t ,*ri/1 8! light :i* lighte? e man0 7,john #a3i71 & we see 9 !m incipi5t rep5tance & fai?1 ev5 ?\gh ! ,*ri/ :o is _! object is yet unkn[n by "n4 ,*ri/ian fell[%ip mu/ h a l>g] basis 9 accept$ ,*ri/ian tru?1 & ,*ur* fell[%ip a /ill l>g] basis 9 common ackn[l$gm5t ( ,n4 ,t4 tea*+ z to ! *ur*4 ,religi\s fell[%ip1 9 ! wide/ s5se1 re/s ^u ! fact t 8,god is no respect] ( p]sons3 b 9 e nation he t fe>e? him & worke? righte\sness is acceptable to him0 7,acts #aj3cd1 #ce74 7c7 ,t religion is to be di/+ui%$ f =mal wor%ip1 :i* is simply ! outw>d expression ( religion4 ,z su* expression1 wor%ip is 8=mal communion betwe5 ,god & 8 p40 ,9 x ,god speaks to man1 & man to ,god4 ,x !re=e prop]ly includes ! read+ ( ,scripture & prea*+ on ! side ( ,god1 & pray] & song on ! side ( ! p4 ,/]rett1 ,reason & ,au?ority 9 ,religion1 #aff--8;,*ri/ian wor%ip is ! utt]ance 7out]ance7 ( ! _s40 ,b !re is m 9 true love ?an c be put into a love-lett]1 & !re is m 9 true religion ?an c be express$ ei!r 9 !ology or 9 wor%ip4 ,*ri/ian wor%ip is communion betwe5 ,god & man4 ,b communion _c be "o-sid$4 ,madame de ,/al1 :om ,he9e call$ 8a :irlw9d 9 petticoats10 end$ "o ( h] brilliant soliloquies by say+3 8,:at a delightful conv]sation we h _h60 ,we may f9d a bett] illu/ration ( ! nature ( wor%ip 9 ,?omas ,kempis's dialogues betwe5 ! sa9t & 8 ,savior1 9 ! ,imitation ( ,*ri/4 ,goe!3 8,aga9/ ! great sup]iority ( ano!r !re is no rem$y b love4444 ,to praise a man is to put "o's self on 8 level40 ,if ?is be ! effect ( lov+ & prais+ man1 :at mu/ be ! effect ( lov+ & prais+ ,god6 ,inscription 9 ,grasm]e ,*ur*3 8,:oev] ?\ art t ent]e/ ?is *ur*1 leave x n )\t "o pray] to ,god = ?yself1 = ^? :o m9i/]1 & = ^? :o wor%ip "h40 ,9 ,james #a3bg--8,pure religion & undefil$ be=e our ,god & ,fa!r is ?is1 to visit ! fa!rless & wid[s 9 _! affliction1 & to keep oneself unspott$ f ! _w0--8religion10 1 is cultus ext]ior2 & ! mean+ is t 8! ext]nal s]vice1 ! outw>d g>b1 ! v ritual ( ,*ri/ianity1 is a life ( purity1 love & self-devotion4 ,:at its true ess5ce1 its inmo/ _s may be1 ! writ] does n say1 b leaves ?is to be inf]r$40 ,on ! relation betwe5 religion & wor%ip1 see ,pr(4 ,day1 9 ,new ,engl&]1 ,jan4 #ahhb2 ,pr(4 ,t4 ,h>wood ,pattison1 ,public ,pray]2 ,tr5*1 ,syn4 ,n4 ,t41 #a2 sec4 #dh2 ,col]idge1 ,aids to ,reflection1 ,introd41 ,aphorism #bc2 ,lightfoot1 ,gal41 #cea1 note #b4 ,*apt] ,,ii4 ,mat]ial ( ,!ology4 ,i4 ,s\rces ( ,!ology4 ,god himself1 9 ! la/ analysis1 mu/ be ! only s\rce ( k ) reg>d to 8 own be+ & relations4 ,!ology is !re=e a summ>y & explanation ( ! cont5t ( ,god's self-revelations4 ,^! are1 fir/1 ! revelation ( ,god 9 nature2 secondly & supremely1 ! revelation ( ,god 9 ! ,scriptures4 ,ambrose3 8,to :om %all ,i give great] cr$it conc]n+ ,god ?an to ,god himself80 ,von ,baad]3 8,to "k ,god )\t ,god is impossible2 !re is no k )\t him :o is ! prime s\rce ( k40 ,c4 ,a4 ,briggs1 ,:i!r1 #h--8;,god reveals tru? 9 sev]al sph]es3 9 univ]sal nature1 9 ! con/itution ( mank9d1 9 ! hi/ory ( our race1 9 ! ,sacr$ ,scriptures1 b above all 9 ! p]son ( ,jesus ,*ri/ our ,"l40 ,f4 ,h4 ,johnson1 ,:at is ,reality8 #cii--8,! tea*] int]v5es :5 ne$$4 ,revelation helps reason & consci5ce1 b is n a sub/itute = !m4 ,b ,ca?olicism affirms ?is sub/itution = ! *ur*1 & ,prote/antism = ! ,bible4 ,! ,bible1 l nature1 gives _m free gifts1 b m 9 ! g]m4 ,gr[+ e?ical ideals mu/ int]pret ! ,bible40 ,a4 ,j4 ,f4 ,behr5ds3 8,! ,bible is only a telescope1 n ! eye :i* sees1 nor ! />s :i* ! telescope br+s to view4 ,x is y\r bus9ess & m9e to see ! />s ) our own eyes40 ,s*urman1 ,agno/icism1 #agh--8,! ,bible is a glass ?r\gh :i* to see ! liv+ ,god4 ,b x is useless :5 y put y\r eyes out40 ,we c "k ,god only s f> z he has reveal$ himself4 ,! imman5t ,god is kn[n1 b ! transc5d5t ,god we d n "k any m ?an we "k ! side ( ! moon t is turn$ away f u4 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #aah--8,! ^w #8au?ority' is d]iv$ f auctor1 augeo1 #8to add4' ,au?ority adds some?+ to ! tru? communicat$4 ,! ?+ add$ is ! p]sonal elem5t ( witness4 ,?is is ne$$ :]ev] !re is ignorance :i* _c be remov$ by our own ef=t1 or unwill+ness :i* results f our own s94 ,9 religion ,i ne$ to add to my own k t :i* ,god imp>ts4 ,reason1 consci5ce1 *ur*1 ,scripture1 are all delegat$ & subord9ate au?orities2 ! only orig9al & supreme au?ority is ,god himself1 or ,*ri/1 :o is only ,god reveal$ & made compreh5sible by u40 ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #aha--8;,all legitimate au?ority repres5ts ! reason ( ,god1 educat+ ! reason ( man & communicat+ itself to x4444 ,man is made 9 ,god's image3 he is1 9 8 fundam5tal capacity1 a son ( ,god1 & he becomes s 9 fact1 & fully1 ?r\gh union ) ,*ri/4 ,!re=e 9 ! tru? ( ,god1 z ,*ri/ pres5ts x to him1 he c recognize 8 own bett] reason1--to use ,plato's beautiful expression1 he c salute x by =ce ( in/9ct z some?+ ak9 to himself1 be=e he c give intellectual acc\nt ( x40 ,balf\r1 ,f\ndations ( ,belief1 #ccb-ccg1 holds t !re is no su* ?+ z unassi/$ reason1 & t1 ev5 if !re 71 natural religion is n "o ( its products4 ,beh9d all evolution ( our own reason1 he says1 /&s ! ,supreme ,reason4 8,consci5ce1 e?ical ideals1 capacity = admiration1 sympa?y1 rep5tance1 righte\s indignation1 z well z our delight 9 beauty & tru?1 are all d]iv$ f ,god40 ,kaftan1 9 ,am4 ,j\r4 ,!ology1 #aijj2 #gah1 #gai1 ma9ta9s t !re is no o!r pr9ciple = dogmatics ?an ,holy ,scripture4 ,yet he holds t k nev] comes directly f ,scripture1 b f fai?4 ,! ord] is n3 ,scripture1 doctr9e1 fai?2 b r1 ,scripture1 fai?1 doctr9e4 ,scripture is no m a direct au?ority ?an is ! *ur*4 ,revelation is address$ to ! :ole man1 t is1 to ! w ( ! man1 & x claims ob$i5ce f him4 ,s9ce all ,*ri/ian k is m$iat$ ?r\gh fai?1 x re/s on ob$i5ce to ! au?ority ( revelation1 & revelation is self-manife/ation on ! "p ( ,god4 ,kaftan %\ld h recogniz$ m fully t n simply ,scripture1 b all kn[able tru?1 is a revelation f ,god1 & t ,*ri/ is 8! light :i* lighte? e man0 7,john #a3i74 ,revelation is an organic :ole1 :i* beg9s 9 nature1 b f9ds its climax & key 9 ! hi/orical ,*ri/ :om ,scripture pres5ts to u4 ,see ,h4 ,c4 ,m9ton's review ( ,m>t9eau's ,seat ( ,au?ority1 9 ,presb4 & ,ref4 ,rev41 ,apr4 #aijj3bjc sq4 #a4 ,scripture & ,nature4 ,by nature we "h mean n only physical facts1 or facts ) reg>d to ! sub/ances1 prop]ties1 =ces1 & laws ( ! mat]ial _w1 b also spiritual facts1 or facts ) reg>d to ! intellectual & moral con/itution ( man1 & ! ord]ly arrangem5t ( human society & hi/ory4 ,we "h use ! ^w 8nature0 9 ! ord9>y s5se1 z includ+ man4 ,!re is ano!r & m prop] use ( ! ^w 8nature10 :i* makes x simply a complex ( =ces & be+s "u ! law ( cause & effect4 ,to nature 9 ?is s5se man belongs only z respects 8 body1 :ile z immat]ial & p]sonal he is a sup]natural be+4 ,free w is n "u ! law ( physical & me*anical causation4 ,z ,bu%nell has said3 8,nature & ! sup]natural toge!r con/itute ! "o sy/em ( ,god40 ,drummond1 ,natural ,law 9 ! ,spiritual ,_w1 #bcb--8,?+s are natural or sup]natural accord+ to :]e we /&4 ,man is sup]natural to ! m9]al2 ,god is sup]natural to ! man40 ,we %all 9 subsequ5t *apt]s use ! t]m 8nature0 9 ! n>r[ s5se4 ,! univ]sal use ( ! phrase 8,natural ,!ology10 h[ev]1 compels u 9 ?is *apt] to employ ! ^w 8nature0 9 its broad] s5se z includ+ man1 al?\gh we d ?is "u prote/1 & ) ?is explanation ( ! m prop] mean+ ( ! t]m4 ,see ,hopk9s1 9 ,pr9ceton ,review1 ,sept4 #ahhb3ahc sq4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,bu%nell sep>ates nature f ! sup]natural4 ,nature is a bl9d tra9 ( causes4 ,god has no?+ to d ) x1 except z he /eps into x f )\t4 ,man is sup]natural1 because he is outside ( nature1 hav+ ! p[] ( orig9at+ an indep5d5t tra9 ( causes40 ,if ?is 7 ! prop] conception ( nature1 !n we might be compell$ to conclude ) ,p4 ,t4 ,=sy?1 9 ,fai? & ,criticism1 #ajj--8,!re is no revelation 9 nature4 ,!re c be none1 because !re is no =giv5ess4 ,we _c be sure ab\t h]4 ,%e is only ae/hetic4 ,h] ideal is h>mony1 n reconciliation4444 ,= ! consci5ce1 /rick5 or /rong1 %e has no ^w4444 ,nature does n conta9 h] own teleology1 & = ! moral s\l t refuses to be fancy-f$1 ,*ri/ is ! "o lum9\s smile on ! d>k face ( ! _w40 ,b ?is is virtually to conf9e ,*ri/'s revelation to ,scripture or to ! inc>nation4 ,z !re 0 an a/ronomy )\t ! telescope1 s !re 0 a !ology be=e ! ,bible4 ,george ,h>ris1 ,moral ,evolution1 #daa--8,nature is bo? evolution & revelation4 ,z soon z ! "q ,h[ is answ]$1 ! que/ions ,:5ce & ,:y arise4 ,nature is to ,god :at spee* is to ?\ght40 ,! title ( ,h5ry ,drummond's book %\ld h be53 8,spiritual ,law 9 ! ,natural ,_w10 = nature is b ! free ?\gh regul> activity ( ,god2 :at we call ! sup]natural is simply 8 extraord9>y work+4 7a7 ,natural !ology4--,! univ]se is a s\rce ( !ology4 ,! ,scriptures ass]t t ,god has reveal$ himself 9 nature4 ,!re is n only an outw>d witness to 8 exi/5ce & "* 9 ! con/itution & gov]nm5t ( ! univ]se 7,ps4 #ai2 ,acts #ad3ag2 ,rom4 #a3bj71 b an inw>d witness to 8 exi/5ce & "* 9 ! he>t ( e man 7,rom4 #a3ag1 #ah1 #ai1 #bj1 #cb2 #b3ae74 ,! sy/ematic exhibition ( ^! facts1 :e!r d]iv$ f obs]vation1 hi/ory or sci5ce1 con/itutes natural !ology4 ,outw>d witness3 ,ps4#ai3a-f--8,! heav5s decl>e ! glory ( ,god02 ,acts #ad3ag--8;he left n himself )\t witness1 9 t he did good1 & gave y f heav5 ra9s & fruitful seasons02 ,rom4 #a3bj--8;= ! invisible ?+s ( him s9ce ! creation ( ! _w are cle>ly se51 be+ p]ceiv$ ?r\gh ! ?+s t are made1 ev5 8 ev]la/+ p[] & div9ity40 ,inw>d witness3 ,rom4 #a3ai-- 8t :i* is kn[n ( ,god is manife/ 9 !m40 ,comp>e ! ( ! gospel 9 v]se #ag1 ) ! ( wra? 9 v]se #ah--two revelations1 "o ( 1 ! o!r ( 2 see ,%$d1 ,homiletics1 #aa4 ,rom4 #a3cb--8kn[+ ! ord9ance ( ,god02 #b3ae--8!y %[ ! "w ( ! law writt5 9 _! he>ts40 ,!re=e ev5 ! hea!n are 8)\t excuse0 7,rom4 #a3bj74 ,!re are two books3 ,nature & ,scripture--"o writt51 ! o!r unwritt53 & !re is ne$ ( /udy+ bo?4 ,on ! passages 9 ,romans1 see ! ,comm5t>y ( ,hodge4 ,spurgeon told ( a godly p]son :o1 :5 sail+ d[n ! ,rh9e1 clos$ 8 eyes1 le/ ! beauty ( ! sc5e %\ld div]t 8 m9d f spiritual !mes4 ,! ,puritan turn$ away f ! moss-rose1 say+ t he w\ld c\nt no?+ on e>? lovely4 ,b ?is is to despise ,god's works4 ,j4 ,h4 ,b>r[s3 8,! ,himalayas are ! rais$ lett]s ^u :i* we bl9d *ildr5 put our f+]s to spell out ! "n ( ,god40 ,to despise ! works ( ,god is to despise ,god himself4 ,god is pres5t 9 nature1 & is n[ speak+4 ,ps4 #ai3a--8,! heav5s decl>e ! glory ( ,god1 & ! firmam5t %[e? 8 h&iwork0--pres5t t5ses4 ,nature is n s mu* a book1 z a voice4 ,hutton1 ,essays1 #b3bcf--8,! direct k ( spiritual communion mu/ be supplem5t$ by k ( ,god's ways ga9$ f ! /udy ( nature4 ,to neglect ! /udy ( ! natural my/]ies ( ! univ]se leads to an arrogant & illicit intrusion ( moral & spiritual assumptions into a diff]5t _w4 ,?is is ! lesson ( ! book ( ,job40 ,hat*1 ,hibb]t ,lectures1 #he--8,man1 ! s]vant & int]pret] ( nature1 is also1 & is !reby1 ! s]vant & int]pret] ( ! liv+ ,god40 ,books ( sci5ce are ! record ( man's pa/ int]pretations ( ,god's works4 7b7 ,natural !ology supplem5t$4--,! ,*ri/ian revelation is ! *ief s\rce ( !ology4 ,! ,scriptures pla9ly decl>e t ! revelation ( ,god 9 nature does n supply all ! k :i* a s9n] ne$s 7,acts #ag3bc2 ,eph4 #c3i74 ,?is revelation is !re=e supplem5t$ by ano!r1 9 :i* div9e attributes & m]ciful provisions only dimly %ad[$ =? 9 nature are made kn[n to m54 ,?is latt] revelation consi/s ( a s]ies ( sup]natural ev5ts & communications1 ! record ( :i* is pres5t$ 9 ! ,scriptures4 ,acts #ag3bc--,paul %[s t1 ?\gh ! ,a!nians1 9 ! erection ( an alt> to an unkn[n ,god1 8ackn[l$g$ a div9e exi/5ce beyond any :i* ! ord9>y rites ( _! wor%ip recogniz$1 t ,be+ 0 /ill unkn[n to !m2 !y _h no j conception ( 8 nature & p]fections0 7,hackett1 9 loco74 ,eph4 #c3i--8! my/]y :i* ha? be5 hid 9 ,god0--?is my/]y is 9 ! gospel made kn[n = man's salvation4 ,hegel1 9 8 ,philosophy ( ,religion1 says t ,*ri/ianity is ! only reveal$ religion1 because ! ,*ri/ian ,god is ! only "o f :om a revelation c come4 ,we may add t z sci5ce is ! record ( man's progressive int]pretation ( ,god's revelation 9 ! realm ( nature1 s ,scripture is ! record ( man's progressive int]pretation ( ,god's revelation 9 ! realm ( _s4 ,! phrase 8^w ( ,god0 does n prim>ily d5ote a record1--x is ! spok5 ^w1 ! doctr9e1 ! vitaliz+ tru?1 disclos$ by ,*ri/2 see ,mat4 #ac3ai--8;he>e? ! ^w ( ! k+dom02 ,luke #e3a--8;he>d ! ^w ( ,god02 ,acts #h3be--8spok5 ! ^w ( ! ,"l02 #ac3dh1 #di--8;glorifi$ ! ^w ( ,god3 444 ! ^w ( ! ,"l 0 spread abroad02 #ai3aj1 #bj--8;he>d ! ^w ( ! ,"l1 444 mightily grew ! ^w ( ! ,"l02 #a ,cor4 #a3ah--8! ^w ( ! cross0--all designat+ n a docum5t1 b an unwritt5 ^w2 cf4 ,j]4 #a3d--8! ^w ( ,jehovah came unto me02 ,ez4 #a3c--8! ^w ( ,jehovah came expressly unto ,ezekiel1 ! prie/40 7c7 ,! ,scriptures ! f9al /&>d ( appeal4--,sci5ce & ,scripture ?r[ light ^u ea* o!r4 ,! same div9e ,_s :o gave bo? revelations is /ill pres5t1 enabl+ ! believ] to int]pret ! "o by ! o!r & ?us progressively to come to ! k ( ! tru?4 ,because ( our f9it5ess & s91 ! total record 9 ,scripture ( ,god's pa/ communications is a m tru/wor?y s\rce ( !ology ?an are our conclusions f nature or our private impressions ( ! tea*+ ( ! ,_s4 ,!ology !re=e looks to ! ,scripture itself z its *ief s\rce ( mat]ial & its f9al /&>d ( appeal4 ,!re is an int]nal "w ( ! div9e ,_s by :i* ! out] ^w is made an inn] ^w1 & its tru? & p[] are manife/$ to ! he>t4 ,scripture repres5ts ?is "w ( ! ,_s1 n z a giv+ ( new tru?1 b z an illum9ation ( ! m9d to p]ceive ! fulness ( mean+ :i* lay wrapp$ up 9 ! tru? already reveal$4 ,*ri/ is 8! tru?0 7,john #ad3f72 89 :om are all ! treasures ( wisdom & k hidd50 7,col4 #b3c72 ! ,holy ,_s1 ,jesus says1 8%all take ( m9e1 & %all decl>e x unto y0 7,john #af3ad74 ,! inc>nation & ! ,cross express ! he>t ( ,god & ! secret ( ! univ]se2 all discov]ies 9 !ology are b ! unfold+ ( tru? involv$ 9 ^! facts4 ,! ,_s ( ,*ri/ enables u to comp>e nature ) ,scripture1 & ,scripture ) nature1 & to correct mi/akes 9 int]pret+ ! "o by light ga9$ f ! o!r4 ,because ! *ur* z a :ole1 by :i* we mean ! company ( true believ]s 9 all l&s & ages1 has ! promise t x %all be guid$ 8into all ! tru?0 7,john #af3ac71 we may confid5tly expect ! progress ( ,*ri/ian doctr9e4 ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce is sometimes reg>d$ z an orig9al s\rce ( religi\s tru?4 ,exp]i5ce1 h[ev]1 is b a te/+ & prov+ ( ! tru? objectively conta9$ 9 ,god's revelation4 ,! ^w 8exp]i5ce0 is d]iv$ f exp]ior1 to te/1 to try4 ,*ri/ian consci\sness is n 8norma normans10 b 8norma normata40 ,light1 l life1 comes to u ?r\gh ! m$iation ( o!rs4 ,yet ! fir/ comes f ,god z really z ! la/1 ( :i* )\t hesitation we say3 8,god made me10 ?\gh we h human p>5ts4 ,z ,i get ?r\gh ! s]vice-pipe 9 my h\se ! same wat] :i* is /or$ 9 ! res]voir ^u ! hillside1 s 9 ! ,scriptures ,i get ! same tru? :i* ! ,holy ,_s orig9ally communicat$ to prophets & apo/les4 ,calv91 ,in/itutes1 book ,i1 *ap4 #g--8;,z nature has an imm$iate manife/ation ( ,god 9 consci5ce1 a m$iate 9 8 works1 s revelation has an imm$iate manife/ation ( ,god 9 ! ,_s1 a m$iate 9 ! ,scriptures40 8,man's nature10 said ,spurgeon1 8is n an organiz$ lie1 yet 8 inn] consci\sness has be5 w>p$ by s91 & ?\gh once x 0 an infallible guide to tru? & duty1 s9 has made x v deceptive4 ,! /&>d ( infallibility is n 9 man's consci\sness1 b 9 ! ,scriptures4 ,:5 consci\sness 9 any matt] is contr>y to ! ^w ( ,god1 we mu/ "k t x is n ,god's voice )9 u1 b ! devil's40 ,dr4 ,george ,a4 ,gordon says t 8,*ri/ian hi/ory is a revelation ( ,*ri/ additional to t conta9$ 9 ! ,new ,te/am5t40 ,%\ld we n say 8illu/rative10 in/ead ( 8additional08 ,on ! relation betwe5 ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce & ,scripture1 see ,/e>ns1 ,evid5ce ( ,*ri/ian ,exp]i5ce1 #bhf-cji3 ,twe/51 ,dogmatik1 #a3cdd-cdh2 ,hodge1 ,sy/4 ,!ol41 #a3ae4 ,h4 ,h4 ,bawd53 8,god is ! ultimate au?ority1 b !re are delegat$ au?orities1 su* z family1 /ate1 *ur*2 in/9cts1 feel+s1 consci5ce2 ! g5]al exp]i5ce ( ! race1 traditions1 utilities2 revelation 9 nature & 9 ,scripture4 ,b ! highe/ au?ority available = m5 9 morals & religion is ! tru? conc]n+ ,*ri/ conta9$ 9 ! ,*ri/ian ,scriptures4 ,:at ! tru? conc]n+ ,*ri/ is1 is det]m9$ by3 7#a7 ! human reason1 condition$ by a "r attitude ( ! feel+s & ! w2 7#b7 9 ! light ( all ! tru? d]iv$ f nature1 includ+ man2 7#c7 9 ! light ( ! hi/ory ( ,*ri/ianity2 7#d7 9 ! light ( ! orig9 & developm5t ( ! ,scriptures !mselves4 ,! au?ority ( ! g5]ic reason & ! au?ority ( ! ,bible are co-relative1 s9ce !y bo? h be5 develop$ 9 ! provid5ce ( ,god1 & s9ce ! latt] is 9 l>ge measure b ! reflection ( ! =m]4 ,?is view enables u to hold a rational conception ( ! function ( ! ,scripture 9 religion4 ,?is view1 fur!r1 enables u to rationalize :at is call$ ! inspiration ( ! ,bible1 ! nature & ext5t ( inspiration1 ! ,bible z hi/ory--a record ( ! hi/oric unfold+ ( revelation2 ! ,bible z lit]ature--a comp5d ( life-pr9ciples1 r ?an a book ( rules2 ! ,bible ,*ri/oc5tric--an inc>nation ( ! div9e ?\ght & w 9 human ?\ght & language40 7d7 ,! !ology ( ,scripture n unnatural4--,?\gh we speak ( ! sy/ematiz$ tru?s ( nature z con/itut+ natural !ology1 we are n to inf] t ,scriptural !ology is unnatural4 ,s9ce ! ,scriptures h ! same au?or z nature1 ! same pr9ciples are illu/rat$ 9 ! "o z 9 ! o!r4 ,all ! doctr9es ( ! ,bible h _! reason 9 t same nature ( ,god :i* con/itutes ! basis ( all mat]ial ?+s4 ,*ri/ianity is a supplem5t>y disp5sation1 n z contradict+1 or correct+ errors 91 natural !ology1 b z m p]fectly reveal+ ! tru?4 ,*ri/ianity is inde$ ! gr\nd-plan ^u :i* ! :ole creation is built--! orig9al & et]nal tru? ( :i* natural !ology is b a p>tial expression4 ,h5ce ! !ology ( nature & ! !ology ( ,scripture are mutually dep5d5t4 ,natural !ology n only prep>es ! way =1 b x receives /imulus & aid f1 ,scriptural !ology4 ,natural !ology may n[ be a s\rce ( tru?1 :i*1 be=e ! ,scriptures came1 x c\ld n furni%4 ,john ,caird1 ,fund4 ,ideas ( ,*ri/ianity4 #bc--8,!re is no su* ?+ z a natural religion or religion ( reason di/9ct f reveal$ religion4 ,*ri/ianity is m pr(\ndly1 m compreh5sively1 rational1 m accordant ) ! deepe/ pr9ciples ( human nature & human ?\ght ?an is natural religion2 or1 z we may put x1 ,*ri/ianity is natural religion elevat$ & transmut$ into reveal$40 ,peabody1 ,*ri/ianity ! ,religion ( ,nature1 lecture #b--8,revelation is ! unveil+1 uncov]+ ( :at previ\sly exi/$1 & x excludes ! idea ( newness1 inv5tion1 creation4444 ,! reveal$ religion ( e>? is ! natural religion ( heav540 ,comp>e ,rev4 #ac3h--8! ,lamb t ha? be5 sla9 f ! f\ndation ( ! _w0 ! com+ ( ,*ri/ 0 no make-%ift2 9 a true s5se ! ,cross exi/$ 9 et]nity2 ! atonem5t is a revelation ( an et]nal fact 9 ! be+ ( ,god4 ,note ,plato's illu/ration ( ! cave :i* c be easily ?read$ by "o :o has previ\sly ent]$ x ) a tor*4 ,nature is ! dim light f ! cave's m\?2 ! tor* is ,scripture4 ,kant to ,jacobi1 9 ,jacobi's ,w]ke1 #c3ebc--8;,if ! gospel _h n previ\sly taught ! univ]sal moral laws1 reason w\ld n yet h obta9$ s p]fect an insight into !m40 ,alex&] ,mc,laren3 8,non-,*ri/ian ?9k]s n[ talk eloqu5tly ab\t ,god's love1 & ev5 reject ! gospel 9 ! "n ( t love1 ?us kick+ d[n ! ladd] by :i* !y h climb$4 ,b x 0 ! ,cross t taught ! _w ! love ( ,god1 & ap>t f ! dea? ( ,*ri/ m5 may hope t !re is a he>t at ! c5tre ( ! univ]se1 b !y c nev] be sure ( x40 ,! p>rot fancies t he taught m5 to talk4 ,s ,mr4 ,sp5c] fancies t he inv5t$ e?ics4 ,he is only us+ ! twilight1 aft] 8 sun has gone d[n4 ,dorn]1 ,hi/4 ,prot4 ,!ol41 #beb1 #bec--8;,fai?1 at ! ,re=mation1 fir/ gave sci5tific c]ta9ty2 x _h ,god sure3 h5ce x proce$$ to bani% scepticism 9 philosophy & sci5ce40 ,see also ,dove1 ,logic ( ,*ri/ian ,fai?1 #ccc2 ,b[51 ,metaph4 & ,e?ics1 #ddb-dfc2 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahgd3dcf2 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #bbf1 #bbg4 #b4 ,scripture & ,rationalism4 ,al?\gh ! ,scriptures make kn[n mu* t is beyond ! p[] ( man's unaid$ reason to discov] or fully to compreh5d1 _! tea*+s1 :5 tak5 toge!r1 9 no way contradict a reason condition$ 9 its activity by a holy affection & enlight5$ by ! ,_s ( ,god4 ,to reason 9 ! l>ge s5se1 z includ+ ! m9d's p[] ( cogniz+ ,god & moral relations--n 9 ! n>r[ s5se ( m]e reason+1 or ! ex]cise ( ! purely logical faculty--! ,scriptures cont9ually appeal4 ,a4 ,! prop] (fice ( reason1 9 ?is l>ge s5se1 is3 7a7 ,to furni% u ) ^? prim>y ideas ( space1 "t1 cause1 sub/ance1 design1 "r1 & ,god1 :i* are ! conditions ( all subsequ5t k4 7b7 ,to judge ) reg>d to man's ne$ ( a special & sup]natural revelation4 7c7 ,to exam9e ! cr$5tials ( communications pr(ess+ to be1 or ( docum5ts pr(ess+ to record1 su* a revelation4 7d7 ,to e/imate & r$uce to sy/em ! facts ( revelation1 :5 ^! h be5 f\nd prop]ly atte/$4 7e7 ,to d$uce f ^! facts _! natural & logical conclusions4 ,?us reason itself prep>es ! way = a revelation above reason1 & w>rants an implicit tru/ 9 su* revelation :5 once giv54 ,dove1 ,logic ( ! ,*ri/ian ,fai?1 #cah--8,reason t]m9ates 9 ! proposition3 ,look = revelation40 ,leibnitz3 8,revelation is ! vic]oy :o fir/ pres5ts 8 cr$5tials to ! prov9cial assembly 7reason71 & !n himself presides40 ,reason c recognize tru? aft] x is made kn[n1 z = example 9 ! demon/rations ( geometry1 al?\gh x c\ld nev] discov] t tru? = itself4 ,see ,cald]wood's illu/ration ( ! p>ty lo/ 9 ! woods1 :o wisely take ! c\rse indicat$ by "o at ! tree-top ) a l>g] view ?an _! own 7,philosophy ( ! ,inf9ite1 #abf74 ,! novice does well to tru/ 8 guide 9 ! =e/1 at lea/ till he le>ns to recognise = himself ! m>ks blaz$ ^u ! trees4 ,lu?>dt1 ,fund4 ,tru?s1 lect4 viii--8,reason c\ld nev] h inv5t$ a self-humiliat+ ,god1 cradl$ 9 a mang] & dy+ on a cross40 ,less+1 ,zur ,ges*i*te und ,litt]atur1 #f3acd--8,:at is ! mean+ ( a revelation t reveals no?+80 ,rits*l d5ies ! presuppositions ( any !ology bas$ on ! ,bible z ! infallible ^w ( ,god on ! "o h&1 & on ! validity ( ! k ( ,god z obta9$ by sci5tific & philosophic processes on ! o!r4 ,because philosoph]s1 sci5ti/s1 & ev5 exegetes1 are n agre$ among !mselves1 he concludes t no tru/wor?y results are atta9able by human reason4 ,we grant t reason )\t love w fall into _m errors ) reg>d to ,god1 & t fai? is !re=e ! organ by :i* religi\s tru? is to be appreh5d$4 ,b we claim t ?is fai? includes reason1 & is itself reason 9 its highe/ =m4 ,fai? criticizes & judges ! processes ( natural sci5ce z well z ! cont5ts ( ,scripture4 ,b x also recognizes 9 sci5ce & ,scripture prior work+s ( t same ,_s ( ,*ri/ :i* is ! s\rce & au?ority ( ! ,*ri/ian life4 ,rits*l ignores ,*ri/'s _w-relations & !re=e secul>izes & disp>ages sci5ce & philosophy4 ,! fai? to :i* he tru/s z ! s\rce ( !ology is unw>rantably sund]$ f reason4 ,x becomes a subjective & arbitr>y /&>d1 to :i* ev5 ! tea*+ ( ,scripture mu/ yield prec$5ce4 ,we hold on ! contr>y1 t !re are asc]ta9$ results 9 sci5ce & 9 philosophy1 z well z 9 ! int]pretation ( ,scripture z a :ole1 & t ^! results con/itute an au?oritative revelation4 ,see ,orr1 ,! ,!ology ( ,rits*l2 ,dorn]1 ,hi/4 ,prot4 ,!ol41 #a3bcc--8,! unreasonable 9 ! empirical reason is tak5 captive by fai?1 :i* is ! nasc5t true reason t despairs ( itself & tru/fully lays hold ( objective ,*ri/ianity40 ,b4 ,rationalism1 on ! o!r h&1 holds reason to be ! ultimate s\rce ( all religi\s tru?1 :ile ,scripture is au?oritative only s f> z its revelations agree ) previ\s conclusions ( reason1 or c be rationally demon/rat$4 ,e =m ( rationalism1 !re=e1 commits at lea/ "o ( ! foll[+ errors3 7a7 ,t ( conf\nd+ reason ) m]e reason+1 or ! ex]cise ( ! logical intellig5ce4 7b7 ,t ( ignor+ ! necessity ( a holy affection z ! condition ( all "r reason 9 religi\s ?+s4 7c7 ,t ( d5y+ our dep5d5ce 9 our pres5t /ate ( s9 ^u ,god's pa/ revelations ( himself4 7d7 ,t ( reg>d+ ! unaid$ reason1 ev5 its normal & unbias$ /ate1 z capable ( discov]+1 compreh5d+1 & demon/rat+ all religi\s tru?4 ,reason mu/ n be conf\nd$ ) ratioc9ation1 or m]e reason+4 ,%all we foll[ reason8 ,yes1 b n individual reason+1 aga9/ ! te/imony ( ^? :o are bett] in=m$ ?an we2 nor by insi/+ on demon/ration1 :]e probable evid5ce alone is possible2 nor by tru/+ solely to ! evid5ce ( ! s5ses1 :5 spiritual ?+s are 9 "q4 ,col]idge1 9 reply+ to ^? :o argu$ t all k comes to u f ! s5ses1 says3 8,at any rate we mu/ br+ to all facts ! light 9 :i* we see !m40 ,?is ! ,*ri/ian does4 ,! light ( love reveals mu* t w\ld o!rwise be invisible4 ,wordswor?1 ,excursion1 book #e 7#eih7--8,! m9d's repose ,on evid5ce is n to be ensur$ ,by act ( nak$ reason4 ,moral tru? ,is no me*anic /ructure1 built by rule40 ,rationalism is ! ma!matical !ory ( k4 ,sp9oza's ,e?ics is an illu/ration ( x4 ,x w\ld d$uce ! univ]se f an axiom4 ,dr4 ,hodge v wrongly describ$ rationalism z 8an ov]use ( reason40 ,x is r ! use ( an abnormal1 p]v]t$1 improp]ly condition$ reason2 see ,hodge1 ,sy/4 ,!ol41 #a3cd1 #ci1 #ee1 & criticism by ,mill]1 9 8 ,feti* 9 ,!ology4 ,! phrase 8sanctifi$ intellect0 means simply intellect accompani$ by "r affections t[>d ,god1 & tra9$ to "w "u _! influ5ce4 ,bi%op ,butl]3 8,let reason be kept to1 b let n su* poor creatures z we are g on object+ to an inf9ite s*eme t we d n see ! necessity or usefulness ( all its p>ts1 & call t reason+40 ,newman ,smy?1 ,dea?'s ,place 9 ,evolution1 #hf--8,unbelief is a %aft sunk d[n into ! d>kness ( ! e>?4 ,drive ! %aft deep en\gh1 & x w\ld come out into ! sunlight on ! e>?'s o!r side40 ,! mo/ unreasonable p 9 ! _w are ^? :o dep5d solely ^u reason1 9 ! n>r[ s5se4 8,! bett] to exalt reason1 !y make ! _w irrational40 8,! h5 t has hat*$ duckl+s walks ) !m to ! wat]'s edge1 b !re %e /ops1 & %e is amaz$ :5 !y g on4 ,s reason /ops & fai? goes on1 f9d+ its prop] elem5t 9 ! invisible4 ,reason is ! feet t /& on solid e>?2 fai? is ! w+s t enable u to fly2 & normal man is a creature ) w+s40 ,comp>e 7#a ,tim4 #f3bj--8! k :i* is falsely s call$07 ) 7#b ,pet4 #a3b--8! k ( ,god & ( ,jesus our ,"l0 full k1 or true k74 ,see ,twe/51 ,dogmatik1 #a3dfg-ejj2 ,julius ,mll]1 ,pro(-texts1 #d1 #e2 ,mansel1 ,limits ( ,religi\s ,?\ght1 #if2 ,dawson1 ,mod]n ,ideas ( ,evolution4 #c4 ,scripture & ,my/icism4 ,z rationalism recognizes too little z com+ f ,god1 s my/icism recognizes too mu*4 ,a4 ,true my/icism4--,we h se5 t !re is an illum9ation ( ! m9ds ( all believ]s by ! ,holy ,_s4 ,! ,_s1 h[ev]1 makes no new revelation ( tru?1 b uses = 8 in/rum5t ! tru? already reveal$ by ,*ri/ 9 nature & 9 ! ,scriptures4 ,! illum9at+ "w ( ! ,_s is !re=e an op5+ ( m5's m9ds to und]/& ,*ri/'s previ\s revelations4 ,z "o initiat$ into ! my/]ies ( ,*ri/ianity1 e true believ] may be call$ a my/ic4 ,true my/icism is t high] k & fell[%ip :i* ! ,holy ,_s gives ?r\gh ! use ( nature & ,scripture z subord9ate & pr9cipal means4 8,my/ic0 "o initiat$1 f 1 8to close ! eyes0--probably 9 ord] t ! s\l may h inw>d vision ( tru?4 ,b div9e tru? is a 8my/]y10 n only z some?+ into :i* "o mu/ be initiat$1 b z 7,eph4 #c3ai7--surpass+ full k1 ev5 to ! believ]2 see ,mey] on ,rom4 #aa3be--8;,i w\ld n1 bre?r51 h y ignorant ( ?is my/]y40 ,! ,g]mans h ,my/ik ) a favorable s5se1 ,my/icismus ) an unfavorable s5se1--correspond+ respectively to our true & false my/icism4 ,true my/icism is intimat$ 9 ,john #af3ac--8! _s ( tru? 444 %all guide y into all ! tru?02 ,eph4 #c3i--8;disp5sation ( ! my/]y02 #a ,cor4 #b3aj--8unto u ,god reveal$ !m ?r\gh ! ,_s40 ,nitzs*1 ,sy/4 ( ,*ri/4 ,doct41 #ce--8,:5ev] true religion revives1 !re is an outcry aga9/ my/icism1 i4 e41 high] k1 fell[%ip1 activity ?r\gh ! ,_s ( ,god 9 ! he>t40 ,comp>e ! *>ge aga9/ ,paul t he 0 mad1 9 ,acts #bf3bd1 #be1 ) 8 self-v9dication 9 #b ,cor4 #e3ac--8:e!r we are beside ourselves1 x is unto ,god40 ,+e1 ,*ri/ian ,my/icism1 #ba--8;,h>nack speaks ( my/icism z rationalism appli$ to a sph]e above reason4 ,he %\ld h said reason appli$ to a sph]e above rationalism4 ,its fundam5tal doctr9e is ! unity ( all exi/5ce4 ,man c realize 8 individuality only by transc5d+ x & f9d+ himself 9 ! l>g] unity ( ,god's be+4 ,man is a microcosm4 ,he recapitulates ! race1 ! univ]se1 ,*ri/ himself40 ,ibid41 #e--,my/icism is 8! attempt to realize 9 ?\ght & feel+ ! imman5ce ( ! temporal 9 ! et]nal1 & ( ! et]nal 9 ! temporal4 ,x implies 7#a7 t ! s\l c see & p]ceive spiritual tru?2 7#b7 t man1 9 ord] to "k ,god1 mu/ be a p>tak] ( ! div9e nature2 7#c7 t )\t hol9ess no man c see ! ,"l2 7#d7 t ! true hi]ophant ( ! my/]ies ( ,god is love4 ,! #8scala p]fectionis' is 7a7 ! purgative life2 7b7 ! illum9ative life2 7c7 ! unitive life40 ,/ev5s1 ,johann9e ,!ology1 #bci1 #bdj--8,! my/icism ( ,john 444 is n a subjective my/icism :i* absorbs ! s\l 9 self-contemplation & rev]y1 b an objective & rational my/icism1 :i* lives 9 a _w ( realities1 appreh5ds div9ely reveal$ tru?1 & bases its exp]i5ce ^u x4 ,x is a my/icism :i* fe$s1 n ^u its own feel+s & fancies1 b ^u ,*ri/4 ,x involves an acceptance ( him1 & a life ( ob$i5ce to him4 ,its motto is3 ,abid+ 9 ,*ri/40 ,z ! p[] press _c disp5se ) ! type1 s ! ,_s ( ,god does n disp5se ) ,*ri/'s ext]nal revelations 9 nature & 9 ,scripture4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #cfd--8,! ^w ( ,god is a =m or m\ld1 into :i* ! ,holy ,_s deliv]s u :5 he creates u anew02 cf4 ,rom4 #f3ag--8ye became ob$i5t f ! he>t to t =m ( tea*+ :]eunto ye 7 deliv]$40 ,b4 ,false my/icism4--,my/icism1 h[ev]1 z ! t]m is commonly us$1 errs 9 hold+ to ! atta9m5t ( religi\s k by direct communication f ,god1 & by passive absorption ( ! human activities into ! div9e4 ,x ei!r p>tially or :olly loses sight ( 7a7 ! outw>d organs ( revelation1 nature & ! ,scriptures2 7b7 ! activity ( ! human p[]s 9 ! reception ( all religi\s k2 7c7 ! p]sonality ( man1 &1 by consequ5ce1 ! p]sonality ( ,god4 ,9 opposition to false my/icism1 we are to rememb] t ! ,holy ,_s works ?r\gh ! tru? ext]nally reveal$ 9 nature & 9 ,scripture 7,acts #ad3ag--8;he left n himself )\t witness02 ,rom4 #a3bj--8! invisible ?+s ( him s9ce ! creation ( ! _w are cle>ly se502 ,acts #g3ea--8ye d always resi/ ! ,holy ,_s3 z y\r fa!rs did1 s d ye02 ,eph4 #f3ag--8! sword ( ! ,_s1 :i* is ! ^w ( ,god074 ,by ?is tru? already giv5 we are to te/ all new communications :i* w\ld contradict or sup]s$e x 7#a ,john #d3a--8;believe n e _s1 b prove ! spirits1 :e!r !y are ( ,god02 ,eph4 #e3aj--8prov+ :at is well pleas+ unto ! ,"l074 ,by ^! te/s we may try ,spiritualism1 ,mormonism1 ,sw$5borgianism4 ,note ! my/ical t5d5cy 9 ,francis de ,sales1 ,?omas ,kempis1 ,madame ,guyon1 ,?omas ,c4 ,upham4 ,^! writ]s seem at times to advocate an unw>rantable abnegation ( our reason & w1 & a 8swall[+ up ( man 9 ,god40 ,b ,*ri/ does n deprive u ( reason & w2 he only takes f u ! p]v]s5ess ( our reason & ! selfi%ness ( our w2 s reason & w are re/or$ to _! normal cle>ness & /r5g?4 ,comp>e ,ps4 #af3g--8;,jehovah1 :o ha? giv5 me c\nsel2 yea1 my he>t in/ructe? me 9 ! night seasons0--,god tea*es 8 p ?r\gh ! ex]cise ( _! own faculties4 ,false my/icism is sometimes pres5t ?\gh unrecogniz$4 ,all expectation ( results )\t ! use ( means p>takes ( x4 ,m>t9eau1 ,seat ( ,au?ority1 #bhh--8,! lazy w w\ld l to h ! vision :ile ! eye t appreh5ds x sleeps40 ,prea*+ )\t prep>ation is l ?r[+ ourselves d[n f a p9nacle ( ! temple & dep5d+ on ,god to s5d an angel to hold u up4 ,*ri/ian ,sci5ce w\ld tru/ to sup]natural ag5cies1 :ile ca/+ aside ! natural ag5cies ,god has already provid$2 z if a dr[n+ man %\ld tru/ to pray] :ile refus+ to seize ! rope4 ,us+ ,scripture 8ad ap]turam libri0 is l guid+ "o's actions by a ?r[ ( ! dice4 ,all51 ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 #aga1 note--8,bo? ,*>les & ,john ,wesley 7 agre$ 9 accept+ ! ,moravian me?od ( solv+ d\bts z to "s c\rse ( action by op5+ ! ,bible at haz>d & reg>d+ ! passage on :i* ! eye fir/ alight$ z a revelation ( ,god's w 9 ! matt]02 cf4 ,w$gwood1 ,life ( ,wesley1 #aic2 ,s\!y1 ,life ( ,wesley1 #a3baf4 ,j4 ,g4 ,paton1 ,life1 #b3gd--8;,aft] _m pray]s & wre/l+s & te>s1 ,i w5t alone be=e ! ,"l1 & on my knees ca/ lots1 ) a solemn appeal to ,god1 & ! answ] came3 #8,g home6' 0 ,he did ?is only once 9 8 life1 9 ov]:elm+ p]plexity1 & f9d+ no light f human c\nsel4 8,to :omsoev] ?is fai? is giv510 he says1 8let him obey x40 ,f4 ,b4 ,mey]1 ,*ri/ian ,liv+1 #ah--8;,x is a mi/ake to seek a sign f heav52 to run f c\nsellor to c\nsellor2 to ca/ a lot2 or to tru/ 9 "s *ance co9cid5ce4 ,n t ,god may n reveal 8 w ?us2 b because x is h>dly ! behavior ( a *ild ) its ,fa!r4 ,!re is a m excell5t way10--namely1 appropriate ,*ri/ :o is wisdom1 & !n g =w>d1 sure t we %all be guid$1 z ea* new /ep mu/ be tak51 or ^w spok51 or decision made4 ,our s]vice is to be 8rational s]vice0 7,rom4 #ab3a72 bl9d & arbitr>y action is inconsi/5t ) ! _s ( ,*ri/ianity4 ,su* action makes u victims ( tempor>y feel+ & a prey to ,satanic deception4 ,9 cases ( p]plexity1 wait+ = light & wait+ ^u ,god w commonly enable u to make an intellig5t decision1 :ile 8:atsoev] is n ( fai? is s90 7,rom4 #ad3bc74 8,false my/icism rea*$ its logical result 9 ! ,buddhi/ic !osophy4 ,9 t sy/em man becomes mo/ div9e 9 ! ext9ction ( 8 own p]sonality4 ,nirvana is rea*$ by ! eightfold pa? ( "r view1 aspiration1 spee*1 conduct1 livelihood1 ef=t1 m9dfulness1 rapture2 & ,nirvana is ! loss ( ability to say3 #8,?is is ,i1' & #8,?is is m9e4' ,su* 0 ,hypatia's attempt1 by subjection ( self1 to be waft$ away into ! arms ( ,jove4 ,george ,eliot 0 wrong :5 %e said3 #8,! happie/ woman has no hi/ory4' ,self-d5ial is n self-effacem5t4 ,! crack$ bell has no individuality4 ,9 ,*ri/ we become our complete selves40 ,col #b3i1 #aj--8;,= 9 him dwelle? all ! fulness ( ! ,godhead bodily1 & 9 him ye are made full40 ,royce1 ,_w & ,individual1 #b3bdh1 #bdi--8;,ass]t ! spiritual man2 abnegate ! natural man4 ,! fle%ly self is ! root ( all evil2 ! spiritual self belongs to a high] realm4 ,b ?is spiritual self lies at fir/ outside ! s\l2 x becomes ours only by grace4 ,plato rightly made ! et]nal ,ideas ! s\rce ( all human tru? & goodness4 ,wisdom comes into a man1 l ,ari/otle's 40 ,a4 ,h4 ,brad=d1 ,! ,inn] ,light1 9 mak+ ! direct tea*+ ( ! ,holy ,_s ! suffici5t if n ! sole s\rce ( religi\s k1 seems to u to ignore ! pr9ciple ( evolution 9 religion4 ,god builds ^u ! pa/4 ,8 revelation to prophets & apo/les con/itutes ! norm & corrective ( our individual exp]i5ce1 ev5 :ile our exp]i5ce ?r[s new light ^u t revelation4 ,on ,my/icism1 true & false1 see ,+e1 ,*ri/ian ,my/icism1 #d1 #e1 #aa2 ,/e>ns1 ,evid5ce ( ,*ri/ian ,exp]i5ce1 #bhi-bid2 ,dorn]1 ,ges*i*te d4 prot4 ,!ol41 #dh-ei1 #bdc2 ,h]zog1 ,encycl41 art43 ,my/ik1 by ,lange2 ,vaughan1 ,h\rs ) ! ,my/ics1 #a3aii2 ,morell1 ,hi/4 ,philos41 #eh1 #aia-bae1 #eef-fbe1 #gbf2 ,hodge1 ,sy/4 ,!ol41 #a3fa-fi1 #ig1 #ajd2 ,flem+1 ,vocab4 ,philos41 9 voce2 ,?oluck1 ,introd4 to ,bl!nsammlung aus d] morg5lndis*5 ,my/ik2 ,william ,james1 ,v>ieties ( ,religi\s ,exp]i5ce1 #cgi-dbi4 #d4 ,scripture & ,romanism4 ,:ile ! hi/ory ( doctr9e1 z %[+ ! progressive appreh5sion & unfold+ by ! *ur* ( ! tru? conta9$ 9 nature & ,scripture1 is a subord9ate s\rce ( !ology1 ,prote/antism recognizes ! ,bible z "u ,*ri/ ! prim>y & f9al au?ority4 ,romanism1 on ! o!r h&1 commits ! two-fold error 7a7 ,( mak+ ! *ur*1 & n ! ,scriptures1 ! imm$iate & suffici5t s\rce ( religi\s k2 & 7b7 ,( mak+ ! relation ( ! individual to ,*ri/ dep5d ^u 8 relation to ! *ur*1 in/ead ( mak+ 8 relation to ! *ur* dep5d ^u1 foll[1 & express 8 relation to ,*ri/4 ,9 ,roman ,ca?olicism !re is a my/ical elem5t4 ,! ,scriptures are n ! complete or f9al /&>d ( belief & practice4 ,god gives to ! _w f "t to "t1 ?r\gh popes & c\ncils1 new communications ( tru?4 ,cyprian3 8,he :o has n ! *ur* = 8 "m1 has n ,god = 8 ,fa!r40 ,augu/9e3 8,i w\ld n believe ! ,scripture1 unless ! au?ority ( ! *ur* also influ5c$ me40 ,francis ( ,assisi & ,ignatius ,loyola bo? repres5t$ ! truly ob$i5t p]son z "o dead1 mov+ only z mov$ by 8 sup]ior2 ! true ,*ri/ian has no life ( 8 own1 b is ! bl9d in/rum5t ( ! *ur*4 ,john ,h5ry ,newman1 ,tracts1 ,!ol4 & ,eccl41 #bhg--8,! ,*ri/ian dogmas 7 9 ! *ur* f ! "t ( ! apo/les1--!y 7 ev] 9 _! sub/ance :at !y are n[40 ,b ?is is demon/rably untrue ( ! immaculate conception ( ! ,virg9 ,m>y2 ( ! treasury ( m]its to be di/ribut$ 9 indulg5ces2 ( ! infallibility ( ! pope 7see ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #ahf74 ,9 place ( ! true doctr9e1 8,ubi ,spiritus1 ibi ecclesia10 ,romanism sub/itutes h] maxim1 8,ubi ecclesia1 ibi ,spiritus40 ,lu!r saw 9 ?is ! pr9ciple ( my/icism1 :5 he said3 8,papatus e/ m]us en?usiasmus40 ,see ,hodge1 ,sy/4 ,!ol41 #a3fa-fi4 ,9 reply to ! ,romani/ argum5t t ! *ur* 0 be=e ! ,bible1 & t ! same body t gave ! tru? at ! fir/ c make additions to t tru?1 we say t ! unwritt5 ^w 0 be=e ! *ur* & made ! *ur* possible4 ,! ^w ( ,god exi/$ be=e x 0 writt5 d[n1 & by t ^w ! fir/ disciples z well z ! late/ 7 begott5 7#a ,pet4 #a3bc--8;begott5 aga9 444 ?r\gh ! ^w ( ,god074 ,! gra9 ( tru? 9 ,roman ,ca?olic doctr9e is express$ 9 #a ,tim4 #c3ae--8! *ur* ( ! liv+ ,god1 ! pill> & gr\nd ( ! tru?0 ! *ur* is ,god's appo9t$ proclaim] ( tru?2 cf4 ,phil4 #b3af--8;hold+ =? ! ^w ( life40 ,b ! *ur* c proclaim ! tru?1 only z x is built ^u ! tru?4 ,s we may say t ! ,am]ican ,republic is ! pill> & gr\nd ( lib]ty 9 ! _w2 b ?is is true only s f> z ! ,republic is built ^u ! pr9ciple ( lib]ty z its f\ndation4 ,:5 ! ,romani/ asks3 8,:]e 0 y\r *ur* be=e ,lu!r80 ! ,prote/ant may reply3 8,:]e y\rs is n n[--9 ! ^w ( ,god4 ,:]e 0 y\r face be=e x 0 wa%$8 ,:]e 0 ! f9e fl\r be=e ! :eat w5t to ! mill80 ,lady ,jane ,grey1 ?ree days be=e h] execution1 ,febru>y #ab1 #aeed1 said3 8,i gr\nd my fai? on ,god's ^w1 & n ^u ! *ur*2 =1 if ! *ur* be a good *ur*1 ! fai? ( ! *ur* mu/ be tri$ by ,god's ^w1 & n ,god's ^w by ! *ur*1 nor yet my fai?40 ,! ,roman *ur* w\ld keep m5 9 p]petual *ildhood--com+ to h] = tru? in/ead ( go+ directly to ! ,bible2 8l ! fooli% "m :o keeps h] boy p9+ 9 ! h\se le/ he /ub 8 toe1 & w\ld love be/ to h him rema9 a babe =ev]1 t %e might "m him /ill40 ,m>t5s51 ,*ri/ian ,dogmatics1 #cj--8,romanism is s busy 9 build+ up a sy/em ( gu>antees1 t %e =gets ! tru? ( ,*ri/ :i* %e w\ld gu>antee40 ,george ,h]b]t3 8,:at wret*$ness c give him any room1 ,^: h\se is f\l :ile he adores 8 broom60 ,x is a semi-p>asitic doctr9e ( safety )\t intellig5ce or spirituality4 ,romanism says3 8,man = ! ma*9e60 ,prote/antism3 8,! ma*9e = man60 ,ca?olicism /rangles1 ,prote/antism re/ores1 individuality4 ,yet ! ,romani/ pr9ciple sometimes appe>s 9 s-call$ ,prote/ant *ur*es4 ,! ,cate*ism publi%$ by ! ,league ( ! ,holy ,cross1 9 ! ,anglican ,*ur*1 conta9s ! foll[+3 8,x is to ! prie/ only t ! *ild mu/ ackn[l$ge 8 s9s1 if he desires t ,god %\ld =give him4 ,d y "k :y8 ,x is because ,god1 :5 on e>?1 gave to 8 prie/s & to !m alone ! p[] ( =giv+ s9s4 ,g to ! prie/1 :o is ! doctor ( y\r s\l1 & :o cures y 9 ! "n ( ,god40 ,b ?is contradicts ,john #aj3g--:]e ,*ri/ says 8,i am ! door02 & #a ,cor4 #c3aa--8o!r f\ndation c no man lay ?an t :i* is laid1 :i* is ,jesus ,*ri/0 ,salvation is atta9$ by imm$iate access to ,*ri/1 & !re is no door betwe5 ! s\l & him4 ,see ,dorn]1 ,ges*4 prot4 ,!ol41 #bbg2 ,s*lei]ma*]1 ,glaub5slehre1 #a3bd2 ,rob9son1 9 ,mad4 ,av4 ,lectures1 #chg2 ,fi%]1 ,nat4 & ,me?od ( ,revelation1 #aj2 ,watk9s1 ,bampton ,lect4 = #ahij3adi2 ,drummond1 ,nat4 ,law 9 ,spir4 ,_w1 #cbg4 ,,ii4 ,limitations ( ,!ology4 ,al?\gh !ology d]ives its mat]ial f ,god's two-fold revelation1 x does n pr(ess to give an exhau/ive k ( ,god & ( ! relations betwe5 ,god & ! univ]se4 ,aft] %[+ :at mat]ial we h1 we mu/ %[ :at mat]ial we h n4 ,we h indicat$ ! s\rces ( !ology2 we n[ exam9e its limitations4 ,!ology has its limitations3 7a7 ,9 ! f9it5ess ( ! human und]/&+4 ,?is gives rise to a class ( necess>y my/]ies1 or my/]ies connect$ ) ! inf9ity & incompreh5sibl5ess ( ! div9e nature 7,job #aa3g2 ,rom4 #aa3cc74 ,job #aa3g--8;,can/ ?\ by se>*+ f9d out ,god8 ,can/ ?\ f9d out ! ,almighty to p]fection80 ,rom4 #aa3cc--8;h[ unse>*able are 8 judgm5ts1 & 8 ways pa/ f9d+ out60 ,e doctr9e1 !re=e1 has its inexplicable side4 ,"h is ! prop] mean+ ( ,t]tullian's say+s3 8,c]tum e/1 quia impossible e/3 quo absurdius1 eo v]ius02 t ( ,anselm3 8,cr$o1 ut intelligam02 & t ( ,abel>d3 8,qui cr$it cito1 levis corde e/40 ,drummond1 ,nat4 ,law 9 ,spir4 ,_w3 8,a sci5ce )\t my/]y is unkn[n2 a religion )\t my/]y is absurd40 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,a f9ite be+ _c grasp ev5 its own relations to ! ,inf9ite40 ,hovey1 ,manual ( ,*ri/4 ,!ol41 #g--8,to inf] f ! p]fection ( ,god t all 8 works nature1 man1 inspiration w be absolutely & un*angeably p]fect3 to inf] f ! p]fect love ( ,god t !re c be no s9 or suff]+ 9 ! _w2 to inf] f ! sov]eignty ( ,god t man is n a free moral ag5t2--all ^! inf]5ces are ra%2 !y are inf]5ces f ! cause to ! effect1 :ile ! cause is imp]fectly kn[n40 ,see ,cald]wood1 ,philos4 ( ,inf9ite1 #dia2 ,sir ,wm4 ,hamilton1 ,discussions1 #bb4 7b7 ,9 ! imp]fect /ate ( sci5ce1 bo? natural & metaphysical4 ,?is gives rise to a class ( accid5tal my/]ies1 or my/]ies :i* consi/ 9 ! app>5tly irreconcilable nature ( tru?s1 :i*1 tak5 sep>ately1 are p]fectly compreh5sible4 ,we are ! victims ( a m5tal or moral a/igmatism1 :i* sees a s+le po9t ( tru? z two4 ,we see ,god & man1 div9e sov]eignty & human fre$om1 ,*ri/'s div9e nature & ,*ri/'s human nature1 ! natural & ! sup]natural1 respectively1 z two disconnect$ facts1 :5 p]haps deep] insight w\ld see b "o4 ,a/ronomy has its c5tripetal & c5trifugal =ces1 yet !y are d\btless "o =ce4 ,! *ild _c hold two oranges at once 9 its little h&4 ,negro prea*]3 8,y c't c>ry two wat]melons "u "o arm40 ,%akespe>e1 ,antony & ,cleopatra1 #a3b--8;,9 nature's inf9ite book ( secresy1 ,a little ,i c read40 ,cooke1 ,cr$5tials ( ,sci5ce1 #cd--8,man's progress 9 k has be5 s con/antly & rapidly accel]at$ t m has be5 ga9$ dur+ ! lifetime ( m5 /ill liv+ ?an dur+ all human hi/ory be=e40 ,& yet we may say ) ,d',arcy1 ,idealism & ,!ology1 #bdh--8,man's position 9 ! univ]se is ecc5tric4 ,god alone is at ! c5tre4 ,to him alone is ! orbit ( tru? completely display$4444 ,!re are circum/ances 9 :i* to u ! onw>d movem5t ( tru? may seem a retrogression40 ,william ,watson1 ,collect$ ,poems1 #bga--8,?9k n ?y wisdom c illume away ,! anci5t tanglem5t ( night & day4 ,en\gh to ackn[l$ge bo?1 & bo? rev]e3 ,!y see n cle>lie/ :o see all ?+s cle>40 7c7 ,9 ! inadequacy ( language4 ,s9ce language is ! m$ium ?r\gh :i* tru? is express$ & =mulat$1 ! inv5tion ( a prop] t]m9ology 9 !ology1 z 9 e o!r sci5ce1 is a condition & crit]ion ( its progress4 ,! ,scriptures recognize a peculi> difficulty 9 putt+ spiritual tru?s into e>?ly language 7#a ,cor4 #b3ac2 #b ,cor4 #c3f2 #ab3d74 #a ,cor4 #b3ac--8n 9 words :i* man's wisdom tea*e?02 #b ,cor4 #c3f--8! lett] kille?02 #ab3d--8unspeakable words40 ,god submits to conditions ( revelation2 cf4 ,john #af3ab--8;,i h yet _m ?+s to say into y1 b ye _c be> !m n[40 ,language has to be creat$4 ,words h to be tak5 f a common1 & to be put to a l>g] & m sacr$1 use1 s t !y 8/agg] "u _! weight ( mean+0--e4 g41 ! ^w 8day10 9 ,g5esis #a1 & ! ^w 9 #a ,cor4 #ac4 ,see ,g\ld1 9 ,am]4 ,com41 on #a ,cor4 #ac3ab--8n[ we see 9 a mirror1 d>kly0--9 a metallic mirror ^: surface is dim & ^: images are obscure ,n[ we behold ,*ri/1 ! tru?1 only z he is reflect$ 9 imp]fect spee*--8b !n face to face0 imm$iately1 )\t ! int]v5tion ( an imp]fect m$ium4 8,z fa/ z we tunnel into ! s&bank ( ?\ght1 ! /ones ( language mu/ be built into walls & ar*es1 to all[ fur!r progress into ! b\ndless m9e40 7d7 ,9 ! incomplet5ess ( our k ( ! ,scriptures4 ,s9ce x is n ! m]e lett] ( ! ,scriptures t con/itutes ! tru?1 ! progress ( !ology is dep5d5t ^u h]m5eutics1 or ! int]pretation ( ! ^w ( ,god4 ,notice ! progress 9 comm5t+1 f homiletical to grammatical1 hi/orical1 dogmatic1 illu/rat$ 9 ,scott1 ,ellicott1 ,/anley1 ,lightfoot4 ,john ,rob9son3 8,i am v]ily p]suad$ t ! ,"l ha? m tru? yet to break =? f 8 holy ^w40 ,rec5t criticism has %[n ! necessity ( /udy+ ea* portion ( ,scripture 9 ! light ( its orig9 & connections4 ,!re has be5 an evolution ( ,scripture1 z truly z !re has be5 an evolution ( natural sci5ce1 & ! ,_s ( ,*ri/ :o 0 9 ! prophets has br\ght ab\t a progress f g]m9al & typical expression to expression t is complete & cle>4 ,yet we /ill ne$ to (f] ! pray] ( ,ps4 #aai3ah--8,op5 ?\ m9e eyes1 t ,i may behold wondr\s ?+s out ( ?y law40 ,on ,new ,te/am5t ,int]pretation1 see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,philosophy & ,religion1 #ccd-ccf4 7e7 ,9 ! sil5ce ( writt5 revelation4 ,= our discipl9e & probation1 mu* is probably hidd5 f u1 :i* we might ev5 ) our pres5t p[]s compreh5d4 ,in/ance ! sil5ce ( ,scripture ) reg>d to ! life & dea? ( ,m>y ! ,virg91 ! p]sonal appe>ance ( ,jesus & 8 occupations 9 e>ly life1 ! orig9 ( evil1 ! me?od ( ! atonem5t1 ! /ate aft] dea?4 ,s also z to social & political que/ions1 su* z slav]y1 ! liquor traffic1 dome/ic virtues1 gov]nm5tal corruption4 8,jesus 0 9 heav5 at ! revolt ( ! angels1 yet he tells u little ab\t angels or ab\t heav54 ,he does n disc\rse ab\t ,ed51 or ,adam1 or ! fall ( man1 or dea? z ! result ( ,adam's s92 & he says little ( dep>t$ spirits1 :e!r !y are lo/ or sav$40 ,x 0 bett] to inculcate pr9ciples1 & tru/ 8 foll[]s to apply !m4 ,8 gospel is n int5d$ to gratify a va9 curiosity4 ,he w\ld n div]t m5's m9ds f pursu+ ! "o ?+ ne$ful2 cf4 ,luke #ac3bc1 #bd--8,"l1 are !y few t are sav$8 ,& he said unto !m1 ,/rive to ent] 9 by ! n>r[ door2 = _m1 ,i say unto y1 %all seek to ent] 91 & %all n be able40 ,paul's sil5ce ^u speculative que/ions :i* he mu/ h pond]$ ) absorb+ int]e/ is a pro( ( 8 div9e inspiration4 ,john ,fo/] sp5t 8 life1 8ga!r+ que/ions = et]nity02 cf4 ,john #ac3g--8,:at ,i d ?\ kn[e/ n n[2 b ?\ %alt und]/& h]eaft]40 ,! mo/ beautiful ?+ 9 a c\nt5ance is t :i* a picture c nev] express4 ,he :o w\ld speak well mu/ omit well4 ,/ory3 8,( e noble "w ! sil5t "p is be/2 ,( all expressions t :i* _c be express$40 ,cf4 #a ,cor4 #b3i--8,?+s :i* eye saw n1 & e> he>d n1 ,& :i* ent]$ n into ! he>t ( man1 ,:atsoev] ?+s ,god prep>$ = !m t love him02 ,deut #bi3bi--8,! secret ?+s belong unto ,jehovah our ,god3 b ! ?+s t are reveal$ belong unto u & to our *ildr540 ,= ,lu!r's view1 see ,hag5ba*1 ,hi/4 ,doctr9e1 #b3chh4 ,see also ,b4 ,d4 ,?omas1 ,! ,secret ( ! ,div9e ,sil5ce4 7f7 ,9 ! lack ( spiritual disc]nm5t caus$ by s94 ,s9ce holy affection is a condition ( religi\s k1 all moral imp]fection 9 ! individual ,*ri/ian & 9 ! *ur* s]ves z a h9drance to ! work+ out ( a complete !ology4 ,john #c3c--8;,except "o be born anew1 he _c see ! k+dom ( ,god40 ,! spiritual ages make mo/ progress 9 !ology1--witness ! half-c5tury succe$+ ! ,re=mation1 & ! half-c5tury succe$+ ! great revival 9 ,new ,engl& 9 ! "t ( ,jona?an ,edw>ds4 ,ueb]weg1 ,logic 7,l9dsay's transl471 #ead--8,sci5ce is mu* "u ! influ5ce ( ! w2 & ! tru? ( k dep5ds ^u ! purity ( ! consci5ce4 ,! w has no p[] to resi/ sci5tific evid5ce2 b sci5tific evid5ce is n obta9$ )\t ! cont9u\s loyalty ( ! w40 ,"l ,bacon decl>$ t man _c ent] ! k+dom ( sci5ce1 any m ?an he c ent] ! k+dom ( heav51 )\t becom+ a little *ild4 ,d>w9 describes 8 own m9d z hav+ become a k9d ( ma*9e = gr9d+ g5]al laws out ( l>ge collections ( facts1 ) ! result ( produc+ 8atrophy ( t "p ( ! bra9 on :i* ! high] ta/es dep5d40 ,b a simil> abnormal atrophy is possible 9 ! case ( ! moral & religi\s faculty 7see ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #cg74 ,dr4 ,all5 said 9 8 ,introductory ,lecture at ,lane ,!ological ,sem9>y3 8,we are v glad to see y if y wi% to be /ud5ts2 b ! pr(essors' *airs are all fill$40 ,,iii4 ,relations ( ,mat]ial to ,progress 9 ,!ology4 7a7 ,a p]fect sy/em ( !ology is impossible4 ,we d n expect to con/ruct su* a sy/em4 ,all sci5ce b reflects ! pres5t atta9m5t ( ! human m9d4 ,no sci5ce is complete or f9i%$4 ,h[ev] x may be ) ! sci5ces ( nature & ( man1 ! sci5ce ( ,god w nev] am\nt to an exhau/ive k4 ,we mu/ n expect to demon/rate all ,scripture doctr9es ^u rational gr\nds1 or ev5 9 e case to see ! pr9ciple ( connection betwe5 !m4 ,:]e we _c d ?is1 we mu/1 z 9 e o!r sci5ce1 set ! reveal$ facts 9 _! places & wait = fur!r light1 in/ead ( ignor+ or reject+ any ( !m because we _c und]/& !m or _! relation to o!r p>ts ( our sy/em4 ,?ree problems left unsolv$ by ! ,egyptians h be5 h&$ d[n to our g5]ation3 7#a7 ! duplication ( ! cube2 7#b7 ! trisection ( ! angle2 7#c7 ! quadrature ( ! circle4 ,dr4 ,johnson3 8,diction>ies are l wat*es2 ! wor/ is bett] ?an none2 & ! be/ _c be expect$ to g q true40 ,hood spoke ( ,dr4 ,johnson's 8,contradiction>y10 :i* _h bo? 8int]i\r0 & 8ext]ior40 ,sir ,william ,?ompson 7,"l ,kelv97 at ! fiftie? anniv]s>y ( 8 pr(essor%ip said3 8,"o ^w *>act]izes ! mo/ /r5u\s ( ! ef=ts = ! advancem5t ( sci5ce :i* ,i h made p]sev]+ly ?r\gh fifty-five ye>s3 t ^w is failure2 ,i "k no m ( electric & magnetic =ce1 or ( ! relations betwe5 e!r1 electricity & pond]able matt]1 or ( *emical aff9ity1 ?an ,i knew & tri$ to tea* my /ud5ts ( natural philosophy fifty ye>s ago 9 my fir/ session z pr(essor40 ,all51 ,religi\s ,progress1 m5tions ?ree t5d5cies4 8,! fir/ says3 ,de/roy ! new6 ,! second says3 ,de/roy ! old6 ,! ?ird says3 ,de/roy no?+6 ,let ! old gradually & quietly gr[ into ! new1 z ,erasmus wi%$4 ,we %\ld accept contradictions1 :e!r !y c be intellectually reconcil$ or n4 ,! tru? has nev] prosp]$ by en=c+ "s 'via m$ia4' ,tru? lies r 9 ! union ( opposite propositions1 z 9 ,*ri/'s div9ity & humanity1 & 9 grace & fre$om4 ,blanco ,:ite w5t f ,rome to infidelity2 ,ore/es ,br[nson f infidelity to ,rome2 s ! bro!rs ,john ,h5ry ,newman & ,francis ,w4 ,newman1 & ! bro!rs ,george ,h]b]t ( ,bem]ton & ,"l ,h]b]t ( ,*]bury4 ,"o w\ld secul>ize ! div9e1 ! o!r w\ld div9ize ! secul>4 ,b if "o is true1 s is ! o!r4 ,let u adopt bo?4 ,all progress is a deep] p5etration into ! mean+ ( old tru?1 & a l>g] appropriation ( x40 7b7 ,!ology is nev]!less progressive4 ,x is progressive 9 ! s5se t our subjective und]/&+ ( ! facts ) reg>d to ,god1 & our consequ5t expositions ( ^! facts1 may & d become m p]fect4 ,b !ology is n progressive 9 ! s5se t its objective facts *ange1 ei!r 9 _! numb] or _! nature4 ,) ,m>t9eau we may say3 8,religion has be5 reproa*$ ) n be+ progressive2 x makes am5ds by be+ imp]i%able40 ,?\gh our k may be imp]fect1 x w h great value /ill4 ,our success 9 con/ruct+ a !ology w dep5d ^u ! proportion :i* cle>ly express$ facts ( ,scripture be> to m]e inf]5ces1 & ^u ! degree 9 :i* !y all coh]e ab\t ,*ri/1 ! c5tral p]son & !me4 ,! progress ( !ology is progress 9 appreh5sion by man1 n progress 9 communication by ,god4 ,orig9ality 9 a/ronomy is n man's creation ( new planets1 b man's discov]y ( planets t 7 nev] se5 be=e1 or ! br++ to light ( relations betwe5 !m t 7 nev] be=e suspect$4 ,rob]t ,k]r ,eccles3 8,orig9ality is a habit ( recurr+ to orig9s--! habit ( secur+ p]sonal exp]i5ce by p]sonal application to orig9al facts4 ,x is n an eduction ( novelties ei!r f nature1 ,scripture1 or inn] consci\sness2 x is r ! habit ( resort+ to primitive facts1 & ( secur+ ! p]sonal exp]i5ces :i* arise f contact ) ^! facts40 ,fi%]1 ,nat4 & ,me?4 ( ,revelation1 #dh--8,! />ry heav5s are n[ :at !y 7 ( old2 !re is no enl>gem5t ( ! /ell> univ]se1 except t :i* comes ?r\gh ! increas$ p[] & use ( ! telescope40 ,we mu/ n imitate ! gre5 sailor :o1 :5 set to /e]1 said he _h 8sail$ by t />40 ,m>t9eau1 ,types1 #a3dib1 #dic--8,metaphysics1 s f> z !y are true to _! "w1 are /ation>y1 precisely because !y h 9 *>ge1 n :at beg9s & ceases to be1 b :at always is4444 ,x is absurd to praise motion = always mak+ way1 :ile disp>ag+ space = /ill be+ :at x ev] 03 z if ! motion y pref] c\ld be1 )\t ! space :i* y reproa*40 ,newman ,smy?1 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics1 #de1 #fg-gj1 #gi--8,true cons]vatism is progress :i* takes direction f ! pa/ & fulfils its good2 false cons]vatism is a n>r[+ & hopeless rev]sion to ! pa/1 :i* is a betrayal ( ! promise ( ! future4 ,s ,jesus came n #8to de/roy ! law or ! prophets'2 he #8came n to de/roy1 b to fulfil' 7,mat4 #e3ag74444 ,! la/ book on ,*ri/ian ,e?ics w n be writt5 be=e ! ,judgm5t ,day40 ,john ,milton1 ,areopagitica3 8,tru? is comp>$ 9 ! ,scripture to a /ream+ f\nta92 if h] wat]s fl[ n 9 a p]petual progression1 !y sick5 into a muddy pool ( con=mity & tradition4 ,a man may be a h]etic 9 ! tru?40 ,paul 9 ,rom4 #b3af1 & 9 #b ,tim4 #b3h--speaks ( 8my gospel40 ,x is ! duty ( e ,*ri/ian to h 8 own conception ( ! tru?1 :ile he respects ! conceptions ( o!rs4 ,t5nyson1 ,locksley ,hall3 8,i t r held x bett] m5 %\ld p]i% "o by "o1 ,?an t e>? %\ld /& at gaze l ,jo%ua's moon at ,ajalon40 ,we d n expect any new worlds1 & we ne$ n expect any new ,scriptures2 b we may expect progress 9 ! int]pretation ( bo?4 ,facts are f9al1 b int]pretation is n4 ,*apt] ,,iii4 ,me?od ,( ,!ology4 ,i4 ,requisites to ! /udy ( ,!ology4 ,! requisites to ! successful /udy ( !ology h already 9 "p be5 indicat$ 9 speak+ ( its limitations4 ,9 spite ( "s repetition1 h[ev]1 we m5tion ! foll[+3 7a7 ,a discipl9$ m9d4 ,only su* a m9d c pati5tly collect ! facts1 hold 9 its grasp _m facts at once1 educe by cont9u\s reflection _! connect+ pr9ciples1 susp5d f9al judgm5t until its conclusions are v]ifi$ by ,scripture & exp]i5ce4 ,rob]t ,br[n+1 ,r+ & ,book1 #age 7,pope1 #bbh7--8,tru? n[h]e lies1 yet ev]y:]e1 9 ^!2 ,n absolutely 9 a portion1 yet ,evolveable f ! :ole3 evolv$ at la/ ,pa9fully1 held t5aci\sly by me40 ,tea*]s & /ud5ts may be divid$ into two classes3 7#a7 ^? :o "k en\gh already2 7#b7 ^? wi% to le>n m ?an !y n[ "k4 ,motto ( ,w9*e/] ,s*ool 9 ,engl&3 8,disce1 aut disc$e40 ,but*]1 ,greek ,g5ius1 #bac1 #bcj--8,! ,sophi/s fanci$ t !y 7 imp>t+ education1 :5 !y 7 only imp>t+ results4 ,ari/otle illu/rates _! me?od by ! example ( a %oemak] :o1 pr(ess+ to tea* ! art ( mak+ pa9less %oes1 puts into ! appr5tice's h& a l>ge assortm5t ( %oes ready-made4 ,a witty ,fr5*man classes toge!r ^? :o w\ld make sci5ce popul>1 metaphysics intelligible1 & vice respectable4 ,! ^w 1 :i* fir/ meant #8leisure1' !n #8philosophical discussion1' & f9ally #8s*ool1' %[s ! pure love ( le>n+ among ! ,greeks40 ,rob]t ,g4 ,+]soll said t ! av]age prov9cial cl]gyman is l ! l& ( ! upp] ,potomac spok5 ( by ,tom ,r&olph1 z almo/ wor?less 9 its orig9al /ate1 & r5d]$ :olly s by cultivation4 ,lotze1 ,metaphysics1 #a3af--8! con/ant :ett+ ( ! knife is t$i\s1 if x is n propos$ to cut any?+ ) x40 8,to d _! duty is _! only holiday10 is ! description ( ,a!nian "* giv5 by ,?ucydides4 ,*itty ask$ a fa!r inquir+ z to 8 son's qualifications = ! law3 8,c y\r son eat sawdu/ )\t any butt]80 ,on opportunities = culture 9 ! ,*ri/ian m9i/ry1 see ,new ,engl&]1 ,oct4 #ahge3fdd2 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,philosophy & ,religion1 #bgc-bge2 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #cah-cbj4 7b7 ,an intuitional z di/+ui%$ f a m]ely logical habit ( m9d1--or1 tru/ 9 ! m9d's primitive convictions1 z well z 9 its processes ( reason+4 ,! !ologian mu/ h insight z well z und]/&+4 ,he mu/ accu/om himself to pond] spiritual facts z well z ^? :i* are s5sible & mat]ial2 to see ?+s 9 _! inn] relations z well z 9 _! outw>d =ms2 to *]i% confid5ce 9 ! reality & ! unity ( tru?4 ,v9et1 ,outl9es ( ,philosophy1 #ci1 #dj--8;,if ,i d n feel t good is good1 :o w ev] prove x to me80 ,pascal3 8,logic1 :i* is an ab/raction1 may %ake ev]y?+4 ,a be+ purely intellectual w be incurably sceptical40 ,calv93 8,satan is an acute !ologian40 ,"s m5 c see a fly on a b>n door a mile away1 & yet c nev] see ! door4 ,zell]1 ,outl9es ( ,greek ,philosophy1 #ic--8;,gorgias ! ,sophi/ 0 able to %[ metaphysically t no?+ c exi/2 t :at does exi/ _c be kn[n by u2 & t :at is kn[n by u _c be imp>t$ to o!rs0 7quot$ by ,w5ley1 ,socrates & ,*ri/1 #bh74 ,ari/otle diff]$ f ^? mod]ate m5 :o ?\ght x impossible to g ov] ! same riv] twice1--he held t x c\ld n be done ev5 once 7cf4 ,wordswor?1 ,prelude1 #ecf74 ,dove1 ,logic ( ! ,*ri/ian ,fai?1 #a-bi1 & especially #be1 gives a demon/ration ( ! impossibility ( motion3 ,a ?+ _c move 9 ! place :]e x is2 x _c move 9 ! places :]e x is n2 b ! place :]e x is & ! places :]e x is n are all ! places t !re are2 !re=e a ?+ _c move at all4 ,haz>d1 ,man a ,creative ,fir/ ,cause1 #aji1 %[s t ! bottom ( a :eel does n move1 s9ce x goes backw>d z fa/ z ! top goes =w>d4 ,an in/antane\s photograph makes ! upp] "p a confus$ blur1 :ile ! spokes ( ! l[] "p are di/9ctly visible4 ,abp4 ,:ately3 8,weak argum5ts are (t5 ?ru/ be=e my pa?2 b1 al?\gh !y are mo/ unsub/antial1 x is n easy to de/roy !m4 ,!re is n a m difficult feat kn[n ?an to cut ?r\gh a cu%ion ) a sword40 ,cf4 #a ,tim4 #f3bj--8oppositions ( ! k :i* is falsely s call$02 #c3b--8! bi%op !re=e mu/ be 444 sob]-m9d$0-- 8well balanc$40 ,! ,scripture speaks ( 8s\nd heal?ful doctr9e0 7#a ,tim4 #a3aj74 ,contra/ #a ,tim4 #f3d-- ail+ 8diseas$ ab\t que/ion+s & disputes ( words40 7c7 ,an acqua9tance ) physical1 m5tal1 & moral sci5ce4 ,! me?od ( conceiv+ & express+ ,scripture tru? is s affect$ by our elem5t>y notions ( ^! sci5ces1 & ! weapons ) :i* !ology is attack$ & def5d$ are s commonly drawn f !m z ars5als1 t ! /ud5t _c af=d to be ignorant ( !m4 ,goe! expla9s 8 own greatness by 8 avoidance ( metaphysics3 8,me9 ,k9d1 ,i* habe es klug gema*t3 ,i* habe nie b]'s ,d5k5 g$a*t0--8,i h be5 wise 9 nev] ?9k+ ab\t ?9k+02 he w\ld h be5 wis]1 _h he pond]$ m deeply ! fundam5tal pr9ciples ( 8 philosophy2 see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,! ,great ,poets & _! ,!ology1 #bif-bii1 & ,philosophy & ,religion1 #a-ah2 also 9 ,bapti/ ,qu>t]ly1 #b3cic sq4 ,_m a !ological sy/em has fall51 l ! ,campanile at ,v5ice1 because its f\ndations 7 insecure4 ,sir ,william ,hamilton3 8,no difficulty arises 9 !ology :i* has n fir/ em]g$ 9 philosophy40 ,n4 ,w4 ,taylor3 8,give me a "y man 9 metaphysics1 & ,i c>e n :o has him 9 !ology40 ,presid5t ,samson ,talbot3 8,i love metaphysics1 because !y h to d ) realities40 ,! maxim 8,ubi tres m$ici1 ibi duo a!i10 witnesses to ! tru? ( ,gal5's words3 --8! be/ physician is also a philosoph]40 ,!ology _c disp5se ) sci5ce1 any m ?an sci5ce c disp5se ) philosophy4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,sci5ce has n invalidat$ any fundam5tal tru? ( revelation1 ?\gh x has modifi$ ! /atem5t ( _m4444 ,physical ,sci5ce w und\bt$ly knock "s ( our crock]y gods on ! head1 & ! soon] ! bett]40 ,!re is great advantage to ! prea*] 9 tak+ up1 z did ,fr$]ick ,w4 ,rob]tson1 "o sci5ce aft] ano!r4 ,*emi/ry ent]$ into 8 m5tal /ructure1 z he said1 8l iron into ! blood40 7d7 ,a k ( ! orig9al languages ( ! ,bible4 ,?is is necess>y to enable u n only to det]m9e ! mean+ ( ! fundam5tal t]ms ( ,scripture1 su* z hol9ess1 s91 propitiation1 ju/ification1 b also to int]pret /atem5ts ( doctr9e by _! connections ) ! context4 ,em]son said t ! man :o reads a book 9 a /range tongue1 :5 he c h a good translation1 is a fool4 ,dr4 ,behr5ds repli$ t he is a fool :o is satisfi$ ) ! sub/itute4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,language is a great organism1 & no /udy s discipl9es ! m9d z ! dissection ( an organism40 ,*ryso/om3 8,?is is ! cause ( all our evils--our n kn[+ ! ,scriptures40 ,yet a mod]n s*ol> has said3 8,! ,bible is ! mo/ dang]\s ( all ,god's gifts to m540 ,x is possible to adore ! lett]1 :ile we fail to p]ceive its _s4 ,a n>r[ int]pretation may contradict its mean+4 ,mu* dep5ds ^u connect+ phrases1 z = example1 ! & 1 9 ,rom4 #e3ab4 ,pr(essor ,philip ,l9dsley ( ,pr9ceton1 #ahac-ahec1 said to 8 pupils3 8,"o ( ! be/ prep>ations = dea? is a ?or\gh k ( ! ,greek gramm>40 ,! y\?ful ,erasmus3 8,:5 ,i get "s money1 ,i w get me "s ,greek books1 &1 aft] t1 "s clo!s40 ,! dead languages are ! only really liv+ ones--free f dang] ( misund]/&+ f *ang+ usage4 ,div9e ,provid5ce has put revelation into fix$ =ms 9 ! ,hebrew & ! ,greek4 ,sir ,william ,hamilton1 ,discussions1 #ccj--8,to be a compet5t div9e is 9 fact to be a s*ol>40 ,on ! true idea ( a ,!ological ,sem9>y ,c\rse1 see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,philos4 & ,religion1 #cjb-cac4 7e7 ,a holy affection t[>d ,god4 ,only ! r5ew$ he>t c prop]ly feel its ne$ ( div9e revelation1 or und]/& t revelation :5 giv54 ,ps4 #be3ad--8,! secret ( ,jehovah is ) !m t fe> him02 ,rom4 #ab3b--8prove :at is ! 444 w ( ,god02 cf4 ,ps4 #cf3a--8! transgression ( ! wick$ speaks 9 8 he>t l an oracle40 8,x is ! he>t & n ! bra9 ,t to ! highe/ do? atta940 ,to 8le>n by he>t0 is some?+ m ?an to le>n by m9d1 or by head4 ,all het]odoxy is prec$$ by het]opraxy4 ,9 ,bunyan's ,pilgrim's ,progress1 ,fai?ful does n g ?r\gh ! ,sl\gh ( ,despond1 z ,*ri/ian did2 & x is by gett+ ov] ! f5ce to f9d an easi] road1 t ,*ri/ian & ,hopeful get into ,d\bt+ ,ca/le & ! h&s ( ,giant ,despair4 8,great ?\ghts come f ! he>t10 said ,vauv5>gues4 ,! prea*] _c1 l ,dr4 ,kane1 k9dle fire ) a l5s ( ice4 ,ari/otle3 8,! p[] ( atta9+ moral tru? is dep5d5t ^u our act+ rightly40 ,pascal3 8,we "k tru?1 n only by ! reason1 b by ! he>t4444 ,! he>t has its reasons1 :i* ! reason kn[s no?+ (40 ,hobbes3 8,ev5 ! axioms ( geometry w\ld be disput$1 if m5's passions 7 conc]n$ 9 !m40 ,macaulay3 8,! law ( gravitation w\ld /ill be controv]t$1 if x int]f]$ ) ve/$ int]e/s40 ,nordau1 ,deg5]acy3 8,philosophic sy/ems simply furni% ! excuses reason dem&s = ! unconsci\s impulses ( ! race dur+ a giv5 p]iod ( "t40 ,"l ,bacon3 8,a tortoise on ! "r pa? w beat a rac] on ! wrong pa?40 ,goe!3 8,z are ! incl9ations1 s also are ! op9ions4444 ,a "w ( art c be compreh5d$ by ! head only ) ! assi/ance ( ! he>t4444 ,only law c give u lib]ty40 ,fi*te3 8,our sy/em ( ?\ght is v (t5 only ! hi/ory ( our he>t4444 ,tru? is desc5d$ f consci5ce4444 ,m5 d n w accord+ to _! reason1 b !y reason accord+ to _! w40 ,ne&]'s motto 03 8,pectus e/ quod !ologum facit0--8,x is ! he>t t makes ! !ologian40 ,john ,/irl+3 8,t is a dreadful eye :i* c be divid$ f a liv+ human heav5ly he>t1 & /ill reta9 its all-p5etrat+ vision1--su* 0 ! eye ( ! ,gorgons40 ,b su* an eye1 we add1 is n all-p5etrat+4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,nev] /udy !ology 9 cold blood40 ,w4 ,c4 ,wilk9son3 8,! head is a magnetic ne$le ) tru? = its pole4 ,b ! he>t is a hidd5 mass ( magnetic iron4 ,! head is drawn some:at t[>d its natural pole1 ! tru?2 b m x is drawn by t ne>] magnetism40 ,see an affect+ in/ance ( ,?omas ,c>lyle's enlight5m5t1 aft] ! dea? ( 8 wife1 z to ! mean+ ( ! ,"l's ,pray]1 9 ,fi%]1 ,nat4 & ,me?4 ( ,revelation1 #afe4 ,on ! importance ( feel+1 9 association ( ideas1 see ,dewey1 ,psy*ology1 #ajf1 #ajg4 7f7 ,! enlight5+ influ5ce ( ! ,holy ,_s4 ,z only ! ,_s fa?oms ! ?+s ( ,god1 s only he c illum9ate our m9ds to appreh5d !m4 #a ,cor4 #b3aa1 #ab--8! ?+s ( ,god none kn[e?1 save ! ,_s ( ,god4 ,b we receiv$ 444 ! ,_s :i* is f ,god2 t we might "k40 ,cic]o1 ,nat4 ,deorum1 #ff--8,nemo igitur vir magnus s9e aliquo adfiatu div9o unquam fuit40 ,pr(essor ,beck ( ,tb+53 8,= ! /ud5t1 !re is no privileg$ pa? lead+ to ! tru?2 ! only "o :i* leads to x is also t ( ! unle>n$2 x is t ( reg5]ation & ( gradual illum9ation by ! ,holy ,_s2 & )\t ! ,holy ,_s1 !ology is n only a cold /one1 x is a deadly poison40 ,z all ! tru?s ( ! diff]5tial & integral calculus are wrapp$ up 9 ! simple/ ma!matical axiom1 s all !ology is wrapp$ up 9 ! decl>ation t ,god is hol9ess & love1 or 9 ! protevangelium utt]$ at ! gates ( ,ed54 ,b dull m9ds _c ( !mselves evolve ! calculus f ! axiom1 nor c s9ful he>ts evolve !ology f ! fir/ prophecy4 ,tea*]s are ne$$ to demon/rate geometrical !orems1 & ! ,holy ,_s is ne$$ to %[ u t ! 8new comm&m5t0 illu/rat$ by ! dea? ( ,*ri/ is only an 8old comm&m5t :i* ye _h f ! beg9n+0 7#a ,john #b3g74 ,! ,pr9cipia ( ,newton is a revelation ( ,*ri/1 & s are ! ,scriptures4 ,! ,holy ,_s enables u to ent] into ! mean+ ( ,*ri/'s revelations 9 bo? ,scripture & nature2 to int]pret ! "o by ! o!r2 & s to "w out orig9al demon/rations & applications ( ! tru?2 ,mat4 #ac3eb--8,!re=e e scribe :o ha? be5 made a disciple ( ! k+dom ( heav5 is l unto a man t is a h\sehold]1 :o br+e? =? out ( 8 treasure ?+s new & old40 ,see ,adolph ,monod's s]mons on ,*ri/'s ,temptation1 address$ to ! !ological /ud5ts ( ,montauban1 9 ,select ,s]mons f ! ,fr5* & ,g]man1 #aag-agi4 ,,ii4 ,divisions ( ,!ology4 ,!ology is commonly divid$ into ,biblical1 ,hi/orical1 ,sy/ematic1 & ,practical4 #a4 ,biblical ,!ology aims to arrange & classify ! facts ( revelation1 conf9+ itself to ! ,scriptures = its mat]ial1 & treat+ ( doctr9e only s f> z x 0 develop$ at ! close ( ! apo/olic age4 ,in/ance ,de,wette1 ,biblis*e ,!ologie2 ,h(mann1 ,s*riftbeweis2 ,nitzs*1 ,sy/em ( ,*ri/ian ,doctr9e4 ,! la/1 h[ev]1 has m ( ! philosophical elem5t ?an prop]ly belongs to ,biblical ,!ology4 ,! ?ird volume ( ,rits*l's ,ju/ification & ,reconciliation is int5d$ z a sy/em ( ,biblical ,!ology1 ! fir/ & second volumes be+ little m ?an an hi/orical introduction4 ,b metaphysics1 ( a ,kantian relativity & ph5om5alism1 ent] s l>gely into ,rits*l's e/imates & int]pretations1 z to r5d] 8 conclusions bo? p>tial & rationali/ic4 ,notice a que/ionable use ( ! t]m ,biblical ,!ology to designate ! !ology ( a "p ( ,scripture sev]$ f ! re/1 z ,/eudel's ,biblical ,!ology ( ! ,old ,te/am5t2 ,s*midt's ,biblical ,!ology ( ! ,new ,te/am5t2 & 9 ! common phrases3 ,biblical ,!ology ( ,*ri/1 or ( ,paul4 ,^! phrases are objectionable z intimat+ t ! books ( ,scripture h only a human orig94 ,^u ! assumption t !re is no common div9e au?or%ip ( ,scripture1 ,biblical ,!ology is conceiv$ ( z a s]ies ( fragm5ts1 correspond+ to ! diff]+ tea*+s ( ! v>i\s prophets & apo/les1 & ! !ology ( ,paul is held to be an unw>rant$ & incongru\s addition to ! !ology ( ,jesus4 ,see ,reuss1 ,hi/ory ( ,*ri/ian ,!ology 9 ! ,apo/olic ,age4 #b4 ,hi/orical ,!ology traces ! developm5t ( ! ,biblical doctr9es f ! "t ( ! apo/les to ! pres5t day1 & gives acc\nt ( ! results ( ?is developm5t 9 ! life ( ! *ur*4 ,by doctr9al developm5t we mean ! progressive unfold+ & appreh5sion1 by ! *ur*1 ( ! tru? explicitly or implicitly conta9$ 9 ,scripture4 ,z giv+ acc\nt ( ! %ap+ ( ! ,*ri/ian fai? into doctr9al /atem5ts1 ,hi/orical ,!ology is call$ ! ,hi/ory ( ,doctr9e4 ,z describ+ ! result+ & accompany+ *anges 9 ! life ( ! *ur*1 outw>d & inw>d1 ,hi/orical ,!ology is call$ ,*ur* ,hi/ory4 ,in/ance ,cunn+ham's ,hi/orical ,!ology2 ,hag5ba*'s & ,%$d's ,hi/ories ( ,doctr9e2 ,ne&]'s ,*ur* ,hi/ory4 ,!re is always a dang] t ! hi/orian w see 8 own views too cle>ly reflect$ 9 ! hi/ory ( ! *ur*4 ,%$d's ,hi/ory ( ,*ri/ian ,doctr9e has be5 call$ 8,! ,hi/ory ( ,dr4 ,%$d's ,*ri/ian ,doctr9e40 ,b if ,dr4 ,%$d's ,augu/9ianism colors 8 ,hi/ory1 ,dr4 ,%eldon's ,arm9ianism also colors 84 ,g4 ,p4 ,fi%]'s ,hi/ory ( ,*ri/ian ,doctr9e is unusually lucid & imp>tial4 ,see ,ne&]'s ,introduction & ,%$d's ,philosophy ( ,hi/ory4 #c4 ,sy/ematic ,!ology takes ! mat]ial furni%$ by ,biblical & by ,hi/orical ,!ology1 & ) ?is mat]ial seeks to build up into an organic & consi/5t :ole all our k ( ,god & ( ! relations betwe5 ,god & ! univ]se1 :e!r ?is k be orig9ally d]iv$ f nature or f ! ,scriptures4 ,sy/ematic ,!ology is !re=e !ology prop]1 ( :i* ,biblical & ,hi/orical ,!ology are ! incomplete & prep>atory /ages4 ,sy/ematic ,!ology is to be cle>ly di/+ui%$ f ,dogmatic ,!ology4 ,dogmatic ,!ology is1 9 /rict usage1 ! sy/ematiz+ ( ! doctr9es z express$ 9 ! symbols ( ! *ur*1 toge!r ) ! gr\nd+ ( ^! 9 ! ,scriptures1 & ! exhibition1 s f> z may be1 ( _! rational necessity4 ,sy/ematic ,!ology beg9s1 on ! o!r h&1 n ) ! symbols1 b ) ! ,scriptures4 ,x asks fir/1 n :at ! *ur* has believ$1 b :at is ! tru? ( ,god's reveal$ ^w4 ,x exam9es t ^w ) all ! aids :i* nature & ! ,_s h giv5 x1 us+ ,biblical & ,hi/orical ,!ology z its s]vants & help]s1 b n z its ma/]s4 ,notice "h ! te*nical use ( ! ^w 8symbol10 f 1 a brief ?r[+ toge!r1 or cond5s$ /atem5t ( ! ess5tials ( ,*ri/ian doctr9e4 ,synonyms are3 ,confession1 cre$1 cons5sus1 decl>ation1 =mul>y1 canons1 articles ( fai?4 ,dogmatism argues to =egone conclusions4 ,! ^w is n1 h[ev]1 d]iv$ f 8dog10 z ,d\glas ,j]rold faceti\sly sugge/$1 :5 he said t 8dogmatism is puppyism full gr[n10 b f to ?9k1 to op9e4 ,dogmatic ,!ology has two pr9ciples3 7#a7 ,! absolute au?ority ( cre$s1 z decisions ( ! *ur*3 7#b7 ,! application to ^! cre$s ( =mal logic1 = ! purpose ( demon/rat+ _! tru? to ! und]/&+4 ,9 ! ,roman ,ca?olic ,*ur*1 n ! ,scripture b ! *ur*1 & ! dogma giv5 by x1 is ! decisive au?ority4 ,! ,prote/ant pr9ciple1 on ! contr>y1 is t ,scripture decides1 & t dogma is to be judg$ by x4 ,foll[+ ,s*lei]ma*]1 ,al4 ,s*weiz] ?9ks t ! t]m 8,dogmatik0 %\ld be disc>d$ z ess5tially unprote/ant1 & t 8,glaub5slehre0 %\ld take its place2 & ,h>nack1 ,hi/4 ,dogma1 #f1 rem>ks t 8dogma has ev]1 9 ! progress ( hi/ory1 dev\r$ its own prog5itors40 ,:ile x is true t e new & advanc$ ?9k] 9 !ology has be5 c\nt$ a h]etic1 !re has always be5 a common fai?--8! fai? :i* 0 once = all deliv]$ unto ! sa9ts0 7,jude #c7--;& ! /udy ( ,sy/ematic ,!ology has be5 "o ( ! *ief means ( pres]v+ ?is fai? 9 ! _w4 ,mat4 #ae3ac1 #ad--8;,e plant :i* my heav5ly ,fa!r plant$ n1 %all be root$ up4 ,let !m alone3 !y are bl9d guides0 !re is tru? plant$ by ,god1 & x has p]man5t div9e life4 ,human errors h no p]man5t vitality & !y p]i% ( !mselves4 ,see ,kaftan1 ,dogmatik1 #b1 #c4 #d4 ,practical ,!ology is ! sy/em ( tru? consid]$ z a means ( r5ew+ & sanctify+ m51 or1 9 o!r words1 !ology 9 its publication & en=cem5t4 ,to ?is dep>tm5t ( !ology belong ,homiletics & ,pa/oral ,!ology1 s9ce ^! are b sci5tific pres5tations ( ! "r me?ods ( unfold+ ,*ri/ian tru?1 & ( br++ x to be> ^u m5 individually & 9 ! *ur*4 ,see ,van ,oo/]zee1 ,practical ,!ology2 ,t4 ,h>wood ,pattison1 ,! ,mak+ ( ! ,s]mon1 & ,public ,pray]2 ,yale ,lectures on ,prea*+ by ,h4 ,w4 ,bee*]1 ,r4 ,w4 ,dale1 ,phillips ,brooks1 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,a4 ,j4 ,f4 ,behr5ds1 ,john ,watson1 & o!rs2 & ! "w on ,pa/oral ,!ology1 by ,h>vey4 ,x is sometimes ass]t$ t !re are o!r dep>tm5ts ( !ology n includ$ 9 ^? above m5tion$4 ,b mo/ ( ^!1 if n all1 belong to o!r sph]es ( rese>*1 & _c prop]ly be class$ "u !ology at all4 ,moral ,!ology1 s call$1 or ! sci5ce ( ,*ri/ian morals1 e?ics1 or !ological e?ics1 is inde$ ! prop] result ( !ology1 b is n to be conf\nd$ ) x4 ,speculative !ology1 s call$1 respect+1 z x does1 su* tru? z is m]e matt] ( op9ion1 is ei!r extra-scriptural1 & s belongs to ! prov9ce ( ! philosophy ( religion1 or is an attempt to expla9 tru? already reveal$1 & s falls )9 ! prov9ce ( ,sy/ematic ,!ology4 8,speculative !ology />ts f c]ta9 a priori pr9ciples1 & f !m und]takes to det]m9e :at is & mu/ be4 ,x d$uces its s*eme ( doctr9e f ! laws ( m9d or f axioms suppos$ to be inwr\ght into its con/itution40 ,bib4 ,sac41 #aheb3cgf--8,speculative !ology tries to %[ t ! dogmas agree ) ! laws ( ?\ght1 :ile ! philosophy ( religion tries to %[ t ! laws ( ?\ght agree ) ! dogmas40 ,!ological ,encyclopdia 7! ^w signifies 8in/ruction 9 a circle07 is a g5]al introduction to all ! divisions ( ,!ology1 toge!r ) an acc\nt ( ! relations betwe5 !m4 ,hegel's ,encyclopdia 0 an attempt$ exhibition ( ! pr9ciples & connections ( all ! sci5ces4 ,see ,crooks & ,hur/1 ,!ological ,encyclopdia & ,me?odology2 ,zckl]1 ,h&b4 d] !ol4 ,wiss5s*aft51 #b3fjf-gfi4 ,! relations ( !ology to sci5ce & philosophy h be5 v>i\sly /at$1 b by none bett] ?an by ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 ,fai? & ,philosophy1 #ah--8,philosophy is a mode ( human k--n ! :ole ( t k1 b a mode ( x--! kn[+ ( ?+s rationally40 ,sci5ce asks3 8,:at d ,i "k80 ,philosophy asks3 8,:at c ,i "k80 ,william ,james1 ,psy*ology1 #a3ade--8,metaphysics means no?+ b an unusually ob/9ate ef=t to ?9k cle>ly40 ,ari/otle3 8,! p>ticul> sci5ces are toil+ workm51 :ile philosophy is ! ar*itect4 ,! workm5 are slaves1 exi/+ = ! free ma/]4 ,s philosophy rules ! sci5ces40 ,) reg>d to philosophy & sci5ce ,"l ,bacon rem>ks3 8,^? :o h h&l$ k h be5 too mu* ei!r m5 ( m]e obs]vation or ab/ract reason]s4 ,! =m] are l ! ant3 !y only collect mat]ial & put x to imm$iate use4 ,! ab/ract reason]s are l spid]s1 :o make cobwebs out ( _! own sub/ance4 ,b ! bee takes a middle c\rse3 x ga!rs its mat]ial f ! fl[]s ( ! g>d5 & ! field1 :ile x trans=ms & dige/s :at x ga!rs by a p[] ( its own4 ,n unlike ?is is ! "w ( ! philosoph]40 ,novalis3 8,philosophy c bake no bread2 b x c give u ,god1 fre$om & immortality40 ,pr(4 ,de,witt ( ,pr9ceton3 8,sci5ce1 philosophy1 & !ology are ! ?ree great modes ( organiz+ ! univ]se into an intellectual sy/em4 ,sci5ce nev] goes bel[ second causes2 if x does1 x is no long] sci5ce1--x becomes philosophy4 ,philosophy views ! univ]se z a unity1 & ! goal x is always seek+ to rea* is ! s\rce & c5tre ( ?is unity--! ,absolute1 ! ,fir/ ,cause4 ,?is goal ( philosophy is ! po9t ( dep>ture = !ology4 ,:at philosophy is /riv+ to f9d1 !ology ass]ts has be5 f\nd4 ,!ology !re=e />ts ) ! ,absolute1 ! ,fir/ ,cause40 ,w4 ,n4 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #dh--8,sci5ce exam9es & classifies facts2 philosophy inquires conc]n+ spiritual mean+s4 ,sci5ce seeks to "k ! univ]se2 philosophy to und]/& x40 ,balf\r1 ,f\ndations ( ,belief1 #g--8,natural sci5ce has = its subject matt] ?+s & ev5ts4 ,philosophy is ! sy/ematic exhibition ( ! gr\nds ( our k4 ,metaphysics is our k respect+ realities :i* are n ph5om5al1 e4 g41 ,god & ! s\l40 ,knight1 ,essays 9 ,philosophy1 #ha--8,! aim ( ! sci5ces is increase ( k1 by ! discov]y ( laws )9 :i* all ph5om5a may be embrac$ & by means ( :i* !y may be expla9$4 ,! aim ( philosophy1 on ! o!r h&1 is to expla9 ! sci5ces1 by at once includ+ & transc5d+ !m4 ,its sph]e is sub/ance & ess5ce40 ,b[ne1 ,!ory ( ,?\ght & ,k1 #c-e--8,philosophy doctr9e ( k 7is m9d passive or active 9 kn[+8--,epi/emology7 doctr9e ( be+ 7is fundam5tal be+ me*anical & un9tellig5t1 or purposive & intellig5t8--,metaphysics74 ,! sy/ems ( ,locke1 ,hume1 & ,kant are prem95tly !ories ( kn[+2 ! sy/ems ( ,sp9oza & ,leibnitz are prem95tly !ories ( be+4 ,hi/orically !ories ( be+ come fir/1 because ! object is ! only det]m9ant = reflective ?\ght4 ,b ! in/rum5t ( philosophy is ?\ght itself4 ,fir/ !n1 we mu/ /udy ,logic1 or ! !ory ( ?\ght2 secondly1 ,epi/emology1 or ! !ory ( k2 ?irdly1 ,metaphysics1 or ! !ory ( be+40 ,pr(essor ,george ,m4 ,=bes on ! ,new ,psy*ology3 8,locke & ,kant repres5t ! two t5d5cies 9 philosophy--! empirical1 physical1 sci5tific1 on ! "o h&1 & ! rational1 metaphysical1 logical1 on ! o!r4 ,locke furni%es ! basis = ! associational s*emes ( ,h>tley1 ! ,mills1 & ,ba92 ,kant = ! ideali/ic s*eme ( ,fi*te1 ,s*ell+1 & ,hegel4 ,! two are n contradictory1 b complem5t>y1 & ! ,scot* ,reid & ,hamilton comb9e !m bo?1 react+ aga9/ ! extreme empiricism & scepticism ( ,hume4 ,hickok1 ,port]1 & ,mc,cosh repres5t$ ! ,scot* s*ool 9 ,am]ica4 ,x 0 exclusively analytical2 its psy*ology 0 ! faculty-psy*ology2 x repres5t$ ! m9d z a bundle ( faculties4 ,! unit>y philosophy ( ,t4 ,h4 ,gre51 ,edw>d ,caird1 9 ,great ,brita91 & 9 ,am]ica1 ( ,w4 ,t4 ,h>ris1 ,george ,s4 ,morris1 & ,john ,dewey1 0 a reaction aga9/ ?is faculty-psy*ology1 "u ! influ5ce ( ,hegel4 ,a second reaction "u ! influ5ce ( ! ,h]b>tian doctr9e ( app]ception sub/itut$ function = faculty1 mak+ all processes phases ( app]ception4 ,g4 ,f4 ,/\t & ,j4 ,m>k ,baldw9 repres5t ?is psy*ology4 ,a ?ird reaction comes f ! influ5ce ( physical sci5ce4 ,all attempts to unify are relegat$ to a metaphysical ,hades4 ,!re is no?+ b /ates & processes4 ,! only unity is ! laws ( _! coxi/5ce & succession4 ,!re is no?+ a priori4 ,wundt id5tifies app]ception ) w1 & reg>ds x z ! unit>y pr9ciple4 ,klpe & ,tit*5] f9d no self1 or w1 or s\l1 b treat ^! z inf]5ces little w>rant$4 ,_! psy*ology is psy*ology )\t a s\l4 ,! old psy*ology 0 exclusively /atic1 :ile ! new emphasizes ! g5etic po9t ( view4 ,gr[? & developm5t are ! lead+ ideas ( ,h]b]t ,sp5c]1 ,prey]1 ,tracy & ,/anley ,hall4 ,william ,james is explanatory1 :ile ,george ,t4 ,ladd is descriptive4 ,cattell1 ,scripture1 & ,mn/]b]g apply ! me?ods ( ,fe*n]1 & ! ,psy*ological ,review is _! organ4 ,_! error is 9 _! negative attitude4 ,! old psy*ology is ne$$ to supplem5t ! new4 ,x has great] scope & m practical significance40 ,on ! relation ( !ology to philosophy & to sci5ce1 see ,lu?>dt1 ,comp5d4 d] ,dogmatik1 #d2 ,hag5ba*1 ,encyclopdie1 #aji4 ,,iii4 ,hi/ory ( ,sy/ematic ,!ology4 #a4 ,9 ! ,ea/]n ,*ur*1 ,sy/ematic ,!ology may be said to h _h its beg9n+ & end 9 ,john ( ,damascus 7#gjj-gfj74 ,ignatius 7 #aae--;,ad ,trall41 c4 #i7 gives u 8! fir/ di/9ct /atem5t ( ! fai? drawn up 9 a s]ies ( propositions4 ,?is sy/ematiz+ =m$ ! basis ( all lat] ef=ts0 7,pr(4 ,a4 ,h4 ,newman74 ,orig5 ( ,alex&ria 7#ahf-bed7 wrote 8 2 ,a?anasius ( ,alex&ria 7#cjj-cgc7 8 ,treatises on ! ,tr9ity & ! ,deity ( ,*ri/2 & ,gregory ( ,nyssa 9 ,cappadocia 7#ccb-cih7 8 4 ,hat*1 ,hibb]t ,lectures1 #cbc1 reg>ds ! 8,de ,pr9cipiis0 ( ,orig5 z ! 8fir/ complete sy/em ( dogma10 & speaks ( ,orig5 z 8! disciple ( ,clem5t ( ,alex&ria1 ! fir/ great tea*] ( philosophical ,*ri/ianity40 ,b :ile ! ,fa!rs j m5tion$ seem to h conceiv$ ! plan ( exp\nd+ ! doctr9es 9 ord] & ( %[+ _! relation to "o ano!r1 x 0 ,john ( ,damascus 7#gjj-gfj7 :o fir/ actually c>ri$ out su* a plan4 ,8 1 or ,summ>y ( ! ,or?odox ,fai?1 may be consid]$ ! e>lie/ "w ( ,sy/ematic ,!ology4 ,ne&] calls x 8! mo/ important doctr9al text-book ( ! ,greek ,*ur*40 ,john1 l ! ,greek ,*ur* 9 g5]al1 0 speculative1 !ological1 semi-pelagian1 sacram5t>ian4 ,! ,apo/les' ,cre$1 s call$1 is1 9 its pres5t =m1 n e>li] ?an ! fif? c5tury2 see ,s*aff1 ,cre$s ( ,*ri/5dom1 #a3ai4 ,mr4 ,glad/one sugge/$ t ! ,apo/les' ,cre$ 0 a developm5t ( ! baptismal =mula4 ,mc,giffert1 ,apo/les' ,cre$1 assigns to ! meagre orig9al =m a date ( ! ?ird qu>t] ( ! second c5tury1 & reg>ds ! ,roman orig9 ( ! symbol z prov$4 ,x 0 fram$ z a baptismal =mula1 b specifically 9 opposition to ! tea*+s ( ,m>cion1 :i* 7 at t "t caus+ mu* tr\ble at ,rome4 ,h>nack h[ev] dates ! orig9al ,apo/les' ,cre$ at #aej1 & ,zahn places x at #abj4 ,see also ,j4 ,c4 ,long1 9 ,bap4 ,qu>4 ,rev41 ,jan4 #ahib3 #hi-aja4 #b4 ,9 ! ,we/]n ,*ur*1 we may 7) ,hag5ba*7 di/+ui% ?ree p]iods3 7a7 ,! p]iod ( ,s*ola/icism1--introduc$ by ,pet] ,lomb>d 7#aajj-aafj71 & rea*+ its culm9ation 9 ,?omas ,aqu9as 7#abba-abgd7 & ,duns ,scotus 7#abfe-acjh74 ,?\gh ,sy/ematic ,!ology _h its beg9n+ 9 ! ,ea/]n ,*ur*1 its developm5t has be5 conf9$ almo/ :olly to ! ,we/]n4 ,augu/9e 7#cec-dcj7 wrote 8 8,en*eiridion ad ,laur5tium0 & 8 8,de ,civitate ,dei10 & ,john ,scotus ,erig5a 7 #hej71 ,roscel9 7#ajib-aabb71 & ,abel>d 7#ajgi-aadb71 9 _! attempts at ! rational explanation ( ! ,*ri/ian doctr9e =e%ad[$ ! works ( ! great s*ola/ic tea*]s4 ,anselm ( ,cant]bury 7#ajcd-aaji71 ) 8 8,proslogion de ,dei ,exi/5tia0 & 8 8,cur ,deus ,homo10 has sometimes1 b wrongly1 be5 call$ ! f\nd] ( ,s*ola/icism4 ,all51 9 8 ,cont9uity ( ,*ri/ian ,?\ght1 repres5ts ! transc5d5ce ( ,god z ! controll+ pr9ciple ( ! ,augu/9ian & ( ! ,we/]n !ology4 ,! ,ea/]n ,*ur*1 he ma9ta9s1 _h f\nd$ its !ology on ,god's imman5ce4 ,pa9e1 9 8 ,evolution ( ,tr9it>ianism1 %[s t ?is is errone\s4 ,augu/9e 0 a !i/ic moni/4 ,he decl>es t 8,dei voluntas r]um natura e/10 & reg>ds ,god's uphold+ z a cont9u\s creation4 ,we/]n !ology recogniz$ ! imman5ce ( ,god z well z 8 transc5d5ce4 ,pet] ,lomb>d1 h[ev]1 7#aajj-aafj71 ! 8magi/] s5t5ti>um10 0 ! fir/ great sy/ematiz] ( ! ,we/]n ,*ur*1 & 8 8,libri ,s5t5ti>um ,quatuor0 0 ! !ological text-book ( ! ,middle ,ages4 ,tea*]s lectur$ on ! 8,s5t5ces0 7,s5t5tia s5t5ce1 ,satz1 locus1 po9t1 article ( fai?71 z !y did on ! books ( ,ari/otle1 :o furni%$ to ,s*ola/icism its impulse & guide4 ,e doctr9e 0 treat$ 9 ! ord] ( ,ari/otle's f\r causes3 ! mat]ial1 ! =mal1 ! effici5t1 ! f9al4 78,cause0 "h requisite3 7#a7 matt] ( :i* a ?+ consi/s1 e4 g41 bricks & mort>2 7#b7 =m x assumes1 e4 g41 plan or design2 7#c7 produc+ ag5t1 e4 g41 build]2 7#d7 end = :i* made1 e4 g41 h\se47 ,! organization ( physical z well z ( !ological sci5ce 0 due to ,ari/otle4 ,dante call$ him 8! ma/] ( ^? :o "k40 ,james ,t5 ,broeke1 ,bap4 ,qu>4 ,rev41 ,jan4 #ahib3a-bf--8,! ,revival ( ,le>n+ %[$ ! _w t ! real ,ari/otle 0 mu* broad] ?an ! ,s*ola/ic ,ari/otle--in=mation v unwelcome to ! ,roman ,*ur*40 ,= ! influ5ce ( ,s*ola/icism1 comp>e ! lit]>y me?ods ( ,augu/9e & ( ,calv91--! =m] giv+ u 8 mat]ials 9 disord]1 l soldi]s biv\ack$ = ! night2 ! latt] arrang+ !m l ^? same soldi]s drawn up 9 battle array2 see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,philosophy & ,religion1 #d1 & ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #ahh1 #ahi4 ,c&li%1 art43 ,dogmatic1 9 ,encycl4 ,brit41 #g3cdj--8;,by & by a mighty intellectual =ce took hold ( ! :ole collect$ dogmatic mat]ial1 & re>$ out ( x ! great s*ola/ic sy/ems1 :i* h be5 comp>$ to ! gr& ,go?ic ca!drals t 7 ! "w ( ! same ages40 ,?omas ,aqu9as 7#abba-abgd71 ! ,dom9ican1 8doctor angelicus10 ,augu/9ian & ,reali/1--& ,duns ,scotus 7#abfe-acjh71 ! ,franciscan1 8doctor subtilis10--wr\ght out ! s*ola/ic !ology m fully1 & left beh9d !m1 9 _! ,summ1 gigantic monum5ts ( intellectual indu/ry & acum54 ,s*ola/icism aim$ at ! pro( & sy/ematiz+ ( ! doctr9es ( ! ,*ur* by means ( ,ari/otle's philosophy4 ,x became at la/ an illimitable morass ( useless subtilities & ab/ractions1 & x f9ally end$ 9 ! nom9ali/ic scepticism ( ,william ( ,occam 7#abgj-acdg74 ,see ,t[ns5d1 ,! ,great ,s*oolm5 ( ! ,middle ,ages4 7b7 ,! p]iod ( ,symbolism1--repres5t$ by ! ,lu!ran !ology ( ,philip ,melan*?on 7#adig-aefj71 & ! ,re=m$ !ology ( ,john ,calv9 7#aeji-aefd72 ! =m] connect+ itself ) ! ,analytic !ology ( ,calixtus 7#aehe-afef71 & ! latt] ) ! ,f$]al !ology ( ,cocceius 7#afjc-affi74 ,! ,lu!ran ,!ology4--,prea*]s prec$e !ologians1 & ,lu!r 7#adhe-aedf7 0 prea*] r ?an !ologian4 ,b ,melan*?on 7#adig-aefj71 8! preceptor ( ,g]many10 z he 0 call$1 embodi$ ! !ology ( ! ,lu!ran *ur* 9 8 8,loci ,communes0 po9ts ( doctr9e common to believ]s 7fir/ edition ,augu/9ian1 aft]w>ds sub/antially ,arm9ian2 grew out ( lectures on ! ,epi/le to ! ,romans74 ,he 0 foll[$ by ,*emnitz 7#aebb-aehf71 8cle> & accurate10 ! mo/ le>n$ ( ! disciples ( ,melan*?on4 ,leonh>d ,hutt] 7#aefc-afaf71 call$ 8,lu!rus r$ivivus10 & ,john ,g]h>d 7#aehb-afcg7 foll[$ ,lu!r r ?an ,melan*?on4 8,fifty ye>s aft] ! dea? ( ,melan*?on1 ,leonh>d ,hutt]1 8 successor 9 ! *air ( !ology at ,witt5b]g1 on an occasion :5 ! au?ority ( ,melan*?on 0 appeal$ to1 tore d[n f ! wall ! portrait ( ! great ,re=m]1 & trampl$ x "u foot 9 ! pres5ce ( ! assemblage0 7,e4 ,d4 ,morris1 pap] at ! #fj? ,anniv]s>y ( ,lane ,sem9>y74 ,george ,calixtus 7#aehf-afef7 foll[$ ,melan*?on r ?an ,lu!r4 ,he taught a !ology :i* recogniz$ ! good elem5t 9 bo? ! ,re=m$ & ! ,romani/ doctr9e & :i* 0 call$ 8,syncretism40 ,he sep>at$ ,e?ics f ,sy/ematic ,!ology1 & appli$ ! analytical me?od ( inve/igation to ! latt]1 beg9n+ ) ! end1 or f9al cause1 ( all ?+s1 viz43 bless$ness4 ,he 0 foll[$ 9 8 analytic me?od by ,dannhau] 7#afjc-afff71 :o treat$ !ology allegorically1 ,calovius 7#afab-afhf71 8! mo/ uncompromis+ def5d] ( ,lu!ran or?odoxy & ! mo/ dra/ic polemici/ aga9/ ,calixtus10 ,qu5/$t 7#afag-afhh71 :om ,hovey calls 8le>n$1 compreh5sive & logical10 & ,hollaz 7 #agcj74 ,! ,lu!ran !ology aim$ to purify ! exi/+ *ur*1 ma9ta9+ t :at is n aga9/ ! gospel is = x4 ,x emphasiz$ ! mat]ial pr9ciple ( ! ,re=mation1 ju/ification by fai?2 b x reta9$ _m ,romani/ cu/oms n expressly =bidd5 9 ,scripture4 ,kaftan1 ,am4 ,j\r4 ,!ol41 #aijj3gaf--8;,because ! m$ival s*ool-philosophy ma9ly held sway1 ! ,prote/ant !ology repres5t+ ! new fai? 0 mean:ile necess>ily accommodat$ to =ms ( k !reby condition$1 t is1 to =ms ess5tially ,ca?olic40 ,! ,re=m$ ,!ology4--,! ^w 8,re=m$0 is "h us$ 9 its te*nical s5se1 z designat+ t phase ( ! new !ology :i* orig9at$ 9 ,switz]l&4 ,zw+le1 ! ,swiss re=m] 7#adhd-aeca71 diff]+ f ,lu!r z to ! ,"l's ,supp] & z to ,scripture1 0 m ?an ,lu!r entitl$ to ! "n ( sy/ematic !ologian4 ,c]ta9 writ+s ( 8 may be consid]$ ! beg9n+ ( ,re=m$ !ology4 ,b x 0 left to ,john ,calv9 7#aeji-aefd71 aft] ! dea? ( ,zw+le1 to arrange ! pr9ciples ( t !ology 9 sy/ematic =m4 ,calv9 dug *annels = ,zw+le's flood to fl[ 91 z ,melan*?on did = ,lu!r's4 ,8 ,in/itutes 78,in/itutio ,religionis ,*ri/ian071 is "o ( ! great works 9 !ology 7sup]ior z a sy/ematic "w to ,melan*?on's 8,loci074 ,calv9 0 foll[$ by ,pet] ,m>tyr 7#aejj-aefb71 ,*ami] 7#aefe-afba71 & ,!odore ,beza 7#aeai-afje74 ,beza c>ri$ ,calv9's doctr9e ( pr$e/9ation to an extreme supralaps>ianism1 :i* is hyp]-,calv9i/ic r ?an ,calv9i/ic4 ,cocceius 7#afjc-affi71 & aft] him ,witsius 7#afbf-agjh71 made !ology c5tre ab\t ! idea ( ! cov5ants1 & f\nd$ ! ,f$]al !ology4 ,leydeck] 7#afdb-agba7 treat$ !ology 9 ! ord] ( ! p]sons ( ! ,tr9ity4 ,amyraldus 7#aeif-affd7 & ,placeus ( ,saumur 7#aeif-afcb7 modifi$ ! ,calv9i/ic doctr9e1 ! latt] by 8 !ory ( m$iate imputation1 & ! =m] by advocat+ ! hypo!tic univ]salism ( div9e grace4 ,turret9 7#afga-agcg71 a cle> & /rong !ologian ^: "w is /ill a text-book at ,pr9ceton1 & ,pictet 7#afee-agbe71 bo? ( !m ,f$]ali/s1 %[$ ! influ5ce ( ! ,c>tesian philosophy4 ,! ,re=m$ !ology aim$ to build a new *ur*1 affirm+ t :at is n d]iv$ f ! ,bible is aga9/ x4 ,x emphasiz$ ! =mal pr9ciple ( ! ,re=mation1 ! sole au?ority ( ,scripture4 ,9 g5]al1 :ile ! l9e betwe5 ,ca?olic & ,prote/ant 9 ,europe runs f we/ to ea/1 ! l9e betwe5 ,lu!ran & ,re=m$ runs f s\? to nor?1 ! ,re=m$ !ology fl[+ ) ! curr5t ( ! ,rh9e nor?w>d f ,switz]l& to ,holl& & to ,engl&1 9 :i* latt] c\ntry ! ,?irty-n9e ,articles repres5t ! ,re=m$ fai?1 :ile ! ,pray]-book ( ! ,engli% ,*ur* is sub/antially ,arm9ian2 see ,dorn]1 ,ges*4 prot4 ,!ologie1 ,e9leit41 #i4 ,on ! diff]5ce betwe5 ,lu!ran & ,re=m$ doctr9e1 see ,s*aff1 ,g]many1 its ,univ]sities1 ,!ology & ,religion1 #afg-agg4 ,on ! ,re=m$ ,*ur*es ( ,europe & ,am]ica1 see ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 ,fai? & ,philosophy1 #hg-abd4 7c7 ,! p]iod ( ,criticism & ,speculation1--9 its ?ree divisions3 ! ,rationali/ic1 repres5t$ by ,seml] 7#agbe-agia72 ! ,transitional1 by ,s*lei]ma*] 7#agfh-ahcd72 ! ,evangelical1 by ,nitzs*1 ,mll]1 ,?oluck & ,dorn]4 ,fir/ ,division4 ,rationali/ic !ologies3 ,?\gh ! ,re=mation _h fre$ !ology 9 great "p f ! bonds ( s*ola/icism1 o!r philosophies aft] a "t took its place4 ,! ,leibnitz- 7#afdf-aged7 ,wolffian 7#afgi-aged7 exagg]ation ( ! p[]s ( natural religion prep>$ ! way = rationali/ic sy/ems ( !ology4 ,buddeus 7#affg-agbi7 combat$ ! new pr9ciples1 b ,seml]'s 7#agbe-agia7 !ology 0 built ^u !m1 & repres5t$ ! ,scriptures z hav+ a m]ely local & tempor>y "*4 ,mi*aelis 7#agaf-aghd7 & ,do$]le9 7#agad-aghi7 foll[$ ,seml]1 & ! t5d5cy t[>d rationalism 0 greatly assi/$ by ! critical philosophy ( ,kant 7#agbd-ahjd71 to :om 8revelation 0 problematical1 & positive religion m]ely ! m$ium ?r\gh :i* ! practical tru?s ( reason are communicat$0 7,hag5ba*1 ,hi/4 ,doct41 #b3cig74 ,ammon 7#agff-ahej7 & ,wegs*eid] 7#agga-ahdh7 7 repres5tatives ( ?is philosophy4 ,daub1 ,m>he9ecke & ,/rauss 7#ahjh-ahgd7 7 ! ,hegelian dogmati/s4 ,! sy/em ( ,/rauss resembl$ 8,*ri/ian !ology z a cemet]y resembles a t[n40 ,/orr 7#agdf-ahje71 ,re9h>d 7#agec-ahab71 & ,knapp 7#agec-ahbe71 9 ! ma9 evangelical1 endeavor$ to reconcile revelation ) reason1 b 7 m or less influ5c$ by ?is rationaliz+ _s4 ,brets*neid] 7#aggf-ahbh7 & ,de ,wette 7#aghj-ahdi7 may be said to h held middle gr\nd4 ,second ,division4 ,transition to a m ,scriptural !ology4 ,h]d] 7#agdd-ahjc7 & ,jacobi 7#agdc-ahai71 by _! m spiritual philosophy1 prep>$ ! way = ,s*lei]ma*]'s 7#agfh-ahcd7 gr\nd+ ( doctr9e 9 ! facts ( ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce4 ,! writ+s ( ,s*lei]ma*] con/itut$ an epo*1 & _h great influ5ce 9 deliv]+ ,g]many f ! rationali/ic toils into :i* x _h fall54 ,we may n[ speak ( a ,?ird ,division--& 9 ?is division we may put ! names ( ,ne&] & ,?oluck1 ,twe/5 & ,nitzs*1 ,mll] & ,lu?>dt1 ,dorn] & ,philippi1 ,ebr>d & ,?omasius1 ,lange & ,kahnis1 all ( !m expon5ts ( a f> m pure & evangelical !ology ?an 0 common 9 ,g]many a c5tury ago4 ,two new =ms ( rationalism1 h[ev]1 h appe>$ 9 ,g]many1 ! "o bas$ ^u ! philosophy ( ,hegel1 & numb]+ among its adh]5ts ,/rauss & ,baur1 ,bi$]mann1 ,lipsius & ,pfleid]]2 ! o!r bas$ ^u ! philosophy ( ,kant1 & advocat$ by ,rits*l & 8 foll[]s1 ,h>nack1 ,h]mann & ,kaftan2 ! =m] emphasiz+ ! ideal ,*ri/1 ! latt] emphasiz+ ! hi/orical ,*ri/2 b nei!r ( ! two fully recogniz+ ! liv+ ,*ri/ pres5t 9 e believ] 7see ,johnson's ,cyclopdia1 art43 ,!ology1 by ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong74 #c4 ,among !ologians ( views div]se f ! prevail+ ,prote/ant fai?1 may be m5tion$3 7a7 ,bell>m9e 7#aedb-afba71 ! ,roman ,ca?olic4 ,besides ,bell>m9e1 8! be/ controv]sial writ] ( 8 age0 7,bayle71 ! ,roman ,ca?olic ,*ur* numb]s among its not$ mod]n !ologians3--,petavius 7#aehc-afeb71 ^: dogmatic !ology ,gibbon calls 8a "w ( incr$ible labor & compass02 ,mel*ior ,canus 7#aebc-aefj71 an oppon5t ( ! ,jesuits & _! s*ola/ic me?od2 ,bossuet 7#afbg-agjd71 :o idealiz$ ,ca?olicism 9 8 ,exposition ( ,doctr9e1 & attack$ ,prote/antism 9 8 ,hi/ory ( ,v>iations ( ,prote/ant ,*ur*es2 ,jans5 7#aehe-afch71 :o attempt$1 9 opposition to ! ,jesuits1 to reproduce ! !ology ( ,augu/9e1 & :o _h 9 ?is ! p[]ful assi/ance ( ,pascal 7#afbc-affb74 ,jans5ism1 s f> z ! doctr9es ( grace are conc]n$1 b n z respects ! sacram5ts1 is virtual ,prote/antism )9 ! ,roman ,ca?olic ,*ur*4 ,moehl]'s ,symbolism1 ,p]rone's 8,prelectiones ,!ologic10 & ,hurt]'s 8,comp5dium ,!ologi ,dogmatic0 are ! late/ & mo/ approv$ expositions ( ,roman ,ca?olic doctr9e4 7b7 ,arm9ius 7#aefj-afji71 ! oppon5t ( pr$e/9ation4 ,among ! foll[]s ( ,arm9ius 7#aefj-afji7 mu/ be reckon$ ,episcopius 7#aehc-afdc71 :o c>ri$ ,arm9ianism to almo/ ,pelagian extremes2 ,hugo ,grotius 7#aeec-afde71 ! juri/ & /atesman1 au?or ( ! gov]nm5tal !ory ( ! atonem5t2 & ,limbor* 7#afcc-agab71 ! mo/ ?or\gh expositor ( ! ,arm9ian doctr9e4 7c7 ,laelius ,soc9us 7#aebe-aefb71 & ,fau/us ,soc9us 7#aeci-afjd71 ! lead]s ( ! mod]n ,unit>ian movem5t4 ,! works ( ,laelius ,soc9us 7#aebe-aefb7 & 8 nephew1 ,fau/us ,soc9us 7#aeci-afjd7 con/itut$ ! beg9n+s ( mod]n ,unit>ianism4 ,laelius ,soc9us 0 ! prea*] & re=m]1 z ,fau/us ,soc9us 0 ! !ologian2 or1 z ,baumg>t5 ,crusius expresses x3 8! =m] 0 ! spiritual f\nd] ( ,soc9ianism1 & ! latt] ! f\nd] ( ! sect40 ,_! writ+s are collect$ 9 ! ,biblio!ca ,fratrum ,polonorum4 ,! ,racovian ,cate*ism1 tak+ its "n f ! ,poli% t[n ,rac[1 conta9s ! mo/ succ9ct exposition ( _! views4 ,9 #affj1 ! ,unit>ian *ur* ( ! ,soc9i 9 ,pol& 0 de/roy$ by p]secution1 b its ,hung>ian (f%oot has /ill m ?an a hundr$ congregations4 #d4 ,briti% ,!ology1 repres5t$ by3 7a7 ,! ,bapti/s1 ,john ,bunyan 7#afbh-afhh71 ,john ,gill 7#afig-agga71 & ,&rew ,full] 7#aged-ahae74 ,"s ( ! be/ ,briti% !ology is ,bapti/4 ,among ,john ,bunyan's works we may m5tion 8 8,gospel ,tru?s ,op5$10 ?\gh 8 8,pilgrim's ,progress0 & 8,holy ,w>0 are !ological treatises 9 allegorical =m4 ,macaulay calls ,milton & ,bunyan ! two great creative m9ds ( ,engl& dur+ ! latt] "p ( ! #ag? c5tury4 ,john ,gill's 8,body ( ,practical ,div9ity0 %[s mu* ability1 al?\gh ! ,rabb9ical le>n+ ( ! au?or occasionally displays itself 9 a curi\s exegesis1 z :5 on ! ^w 8,abba0 he rem>ks3 8,y see t ?is ^w :i* means ',fa!r' reads ! same :e!r we read =w>d or backw>d2 :i* sugge/s t ,god is ! same :i*ev] way we look at him40 ,&rew ,full]'s 8,lett]s on ,sy/ematic ,div9ity0 is a brief comp5d ( !ology4 ,8 treatises ^u special doctr9es are m>k$ by s\nd judgm5t & cle> insight4 ,!y 7 ! mo/ influ5tial factor 9 rescu+ ! evangelical *ur*es ( ,engl& f ant9omianism4 ,!y ju/ify ! epi!ts :i* ,rob]t ,hall1 "o ( ! greate/ ( ,bapti/ prea*]s1 gives him3 8sagaci\s10 8lum9\s10 8p[]ful40 7b7 ,! ,puritans1 ,john ,ow5 7#afaf-afhc71 ,ri*>d ,baxt] 7#afae-afia71 ,john ,h[e 7#afcj-agje71 & ,?omas ,ridgeley 7#afff-agcd74 ,ow5 0 ! mo/ rigid1 z ,baxt] 0 ! mo/ lib]al1 ( ! ,puritans4 ,! ,encyclopdia ,britannica rem>ks3 8,z a !ological ?9k] & writ]1 ,john ,ow5 holds 8 own di/9ctly def9$ place among ^? titanic intellects ) :i* ! age ab\nd$4 ,surpass$ by ,baxt] 9 po9t & pa?os1 by ,h[e 9 imag9ation & ! high] philosophy1 he is unrival$ 9 8 p[] ( unfold+ ! ri* mean+s ( ,scripture4 ,9 8 writ+s he 0 prem95tly ! great !ologian40 ,baxt] wrote a 8,me?odus ,!ologi10 & a 8,ca?olic ,!ology02 ,john ,h[e is *iefly kn[n by 8 8,liv+ ,temple02 ,?omas ,ridgeley by 8 8,body ( ,div9ity40 ,*>les ,h4 ,spurgeon nev] ceas$ to urge 8 /ud5ts to become famili> ) ! ,puritan ,adams1 ,ambrose1 ,b[d51 ,manton & ,sibbes4 7c7 ,! ,scot* ,presbyt]ians1 ,?omas ,bo/on 7#afgf-agcb71 ,john ,dick 7#agfd-ahcc71 & ,?omas ,*alm]s 7#aghj-ahdg74 ,( ! ,scot* ,presbyt]ians1 ,bo/on is ! mo/ volum9\s1 ,dick ! mo/ calm & fair1 ,*alm]s ! mo/ f]vid & popul>4 7d7 ,! ,me?odi/s1 ,john ,wesley 7#agjc-agia71 & ,ri*>d ,watson 7#agha-ahcc74 ,( ! ,me?odi/s1 ,john ,wesley's doctr9e is pres5t$ 9 8,*ri/ian ,!ology10 collect$ f 8 writ+s by ! ,rev4 ,?ornley ,smi?4 ,! great ,me?odi/ text-book1 h[ev]1 is ! 8,in/itutes0 ( ,watson1 :o sy/ematiz$ & exp\nd$ ! ,wesleyan !ology4 ,pope1 a rec5t ,engli% !ologian1 foll[s ,watson's modifi$ & improv$ ,arm9ianism1 :ile ,:$on & ,raymond1 rec5t ,am]ican writ]s1 hold r to a radical & extreme ,arm9ianism4 7e7 ,! ,quak]s1 ,george ,fox 7#afbd-afia71 & ,rob]t ,b>clay 7#afdh-afij74 ,z ,jesus1 ! prea*] & re=m]1 prec$$ ,paul ! !ologian2 z ,lu!r prec$$ ,melan*?on2 z ,zw+le prec$$ ,calv92 z ,laelius ,soc9us prec$$ ,fau/us ,soc9us2 z ,wesley prec$$ ,watson2 s ,fox prec$$ ,b>clay4 ,b>clay wrote an 8,apology = ! true ,*ri/ian ,div9ity10 :i* ,dr4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son describ$ z 8n a =mal treatise ( ,sy/ematic ,!ology1 b ! able/ exposition ( ! views ( ! ,quak]s40 ,george ,fox 0 ! re=m]1 ,william ,p5n ! social f\nd]1 ,rob]t ,b>clay ! !ologian1 ( ,quak]ism4 7f7 ,! ,engli% ,*ur*m51 ,ri*>d ,hook] 7#aeec-afjj71 ,gilb]t ,burnet 7#afdc-agae71 & ,john ,pe>son 7#afac-afhf74 ,! ,engli% *ur* has produc$ no great sy/ematic !ologian 7see reasons assign$ 9 ,dorn]1 ,ges*4 prot4 ,!ologie1 #dgj74 ,! 8judici\s0 ,hook] is /ill its greate/ !ological writ]1 al?\gh 8 "w is only on 8,ecclesia/ical ,polity40 ,bi%op ,burnet is ! au?or ( ! 8,exposition ( ! ,,xxxix ,articles10 & ,bi%op ,pe>son ( ! 8,exposition ( ! ,cre$40 ,bo? ^! are common ,engli% text-books4 ,a rec5t 8,comp5dium ( ,dogmatic ,!ology10 by ,litton1 %[s a t5d5cy to return f ! usual ,arm9ianism ( ! ,anglican *ur* to ! old ,augu/9ianism2 s also ,bi%op ,m\le's 8,outl9es ( ,*ri/ian ,doctr9e10 & ,mason's 8,fai? ( ! ,gospel40 #e4 ,am]ican !ology1 runn+ 9 two l9es3 7a7 ,! ,re=m$ sy/em ( ,jona?an ,edw>ds 7#agjc-ageh71 modifi$ successively by ,joseph ,bellamy 7#agai-agij71 ,samuel ,hopk9s 7#agba-ahjc71 ,timo?y ,dwight 7#ageb-ahag71 ,na?anael ,emmons 7#agde-ahdj71 ,leon>d ,woods 7#aggd-ahed71 ,*>les ,g4 ,f9ney 7#agib-ahge71 ,na?aniel ,w4 ,taylor 7#aghf-aheh71 & ,horace ,bu%nell 7#ahjb-ahgf74 ,calv9ism1 z ?us modifi$1 is (t5 call$ ! ,new ,engl&1 or ,new ,s*ool1 !ology4 ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 "o ( ! greate/ ( metaphysicians & !ologians1 0 an ideali/ :o held t ,god is ! only real cause1 ei!r 9 ! realm ( matt] or 9 ! realm ( m9d4 ,he reg>d$ ! *ief good z happ9ess--a =m ( s5sibility4 ,virtue 0 volunt>y *oice ( ?is good4 ,h5ce union ) ,adam 9 acts & ex]cises 0 suffici5t4 ,?us ,god's w made id5tity ( be+ ) ,adam4 ,?is l$ to ! ex]cise-sy/em ( ,hopk9s & ,emmons1 on ! "o h&1 & to ,bellamy's & ,dwight's d5ial ( any imputation ( ,adam's s9 or ( inborn depravity1 on ! o!r--9 :i* la/ d5ial agree _m o!r ,new ,engl& !ologians :o reject ! ex]cise-s*eme1 z = example1 ,/rong1 ,tyl]1 ,smalley1 ,burton1 ,woods1 & ,p>k4 ,dr4 ,n4 ,w4 ,taylor add$ a m di/9ctly ,arm9ian elem5t1 ! p[] ( contr>y *oice--& ) ?is t5et ( ! ,new ,hav5 !ology1 ,*>les ,g4 ,f9ney1 ( ,ob]l91 sub/antially agre$4 ,horace ,bu%nell held to a practically ,sabellian view ( ! ,tr9ity1 & to a moral-influ5ce !ory ( ! atonem5t4 ,?us f c]ta9 pr9ciples admitt$ by ,edw>ds1 :o held 9 ! ma9 to an ,old ,s*ool !ology1 ! ,new ,s*ool !ology has be5 gradually develop$4 ,rob]t ,hall call$ ,edw>ds 8! greate/ ( ! sons ( m540 ,dr4 ,*alm]s reg>d$ him z ! 8greate/ ( !ologians40 ,dr4 ,fairbairn says3 8,he is n only ! greate/ ( all ! ?9k]s t ,am]ica has produc$1 b also ! highe/ speculative g5ius ( ! eighte5? c5tury4 ,9 a f> high] degree ?an ,sp9oza1 he 0 a ',god-intoxicat$ man4'0 ,8 fundam5tal notion t !re is no causality except ! div9e 0 made ! basis ( a !ory ( necessity :i* play$ into ! h&s ( ! dei/s :om he oppos$ & 0 ali5 n only to ,*ri/ianity b ev5 to !ism4 ,edw>ds c\ld n h gott5 8 idealism f ,b]keley2 x may h be5 sugge/$ to him by ! writ+s ( ,locke or ,newton1 ,cudwor? or ,desc>tes1 ,john ,norris or ,ar?ur ,colli]4 ,see ,pr(4 ,h4 ,n4 ,g>d9]1 9 ,philos4 ,rev41 ,nov4 #aijj3egc-eif2 ,pr(4 ,e4 ,c4 ,smy?1 9 ,am4 ,j\r4 ,!ol41 ,oct4 #ahig3ief2 ,all51 ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 #af1 #cjh-caj1 & 9 ,atlantic ,mon?ly1 ,dec4 #ahia3gfg2 ,sanborn1 9 ,j\r4 ,spec4 ,philos41 ,oct4 #ahhc3dja-dbj2 ,g4 ,p4 ,fi%]1 ,edw>ds on ! ,tr9ity1 #ah1 #ai4 7b7 ,! old] ,calv9ism1 repres5t$ by ,*>les ,hodge ! fa!r 7#agig-ahgh7 & ,a4 ,a4 ,hodge ! son 7#ahbc-ahhf71 toge!r ) ,h5ry ,b4 ,smi? 7#ahae-ahgg71 ,rob]t ,j4 ,breck9ridge 7#ahjj-ahga71 ,samuel ,j4 ,baird1 & ,william ,g4 ,t4 ,%$d 7#ahbj-ahid74 ,all ^!1 al?\gh ) m9or diff]5ces1 hold to views ( human depravity & div9e grace m ne>ly con=m$ to ! doctr9e ( ,augu/9e & ,calv91 & are = ?is reason di/+ui%$ f ! ,new ,engl& !ologians & _! foll[]s by ! popul> title ( ,old ,s*ool4 ,old ,s*ool !ology1 9 its view ( pr$e/9ation1 exalts ,god2 ,new ,s*ool !ology1 by emphasiz+ ! fre$om ( ! w1 exalts man4 ,x is yet m important to notice t ,old ,s*ool !ology has = its *>act]i/ic t5et ! guilt ( inborn depravity4 ,b among ^? :o hold ?is view1 "s are f$]ali/s & creationi/s1 & ju/ify ,god's condemnation ( all m5 ^u ! gr\nd t ,adam repres5t$ 8 po/]ity4 ,su* are ! ,pr9ceton !ologians g5]ally1 includ+ ,*>les ,hodge1 ,a4 ,a4 ,hodge1 & ! bro!rs ,alex&]4 ,among ^? :o hold to ! ,old ,s*ool doctr9e ( ! guilt ( inborn depravity1 h[ev]1 !re are o!rs :o are traducians1 & :o expla9 ! imputation ( ,adam's s9 to 8 po/]ity ^u ! gr\nd ( ! natural union betwe5 him & !m4 ,baird's 8,elohim ,reveal$0 & ,%$d's essay on 8,orig9al ,s90 7,s9 a ,nature & t ,nature ,guilt7 repres5t ?is reali/ic conception ( ! relation ( ! race to its fir/ fa!r4 ,r4 ,j4 ,breck9ridge1 ,r4 ,l4 ,dabney1 & ,j4 ,h4 ,?ornwell ass]t ! fact ( inh]5t corruption & guilt1 b refuse to assign any rationale = x1 ?\gh !y t5d to realism4 ,h4 ,b4 ,smi? holds gu>d$ly to ! !ory ( m$iate imputation4 ,on ! hi/ory ( ,sy/ematic ,!ology 9 g5]al1 see ,hag5ba*1 ,hi/ory ( ,doctr9e 7f :i* _m ( ! facts above giv5 are tak571 & ,%$d1 ,hi/ory ( ,doctr9e2 also1 ,ebr>d1 ,dogmatik1 #a3dd-ajj2 ,kahnis1 ,dogmatik1 #a3ae-abh2 ,hase1 ,hutt]us ,r$ivivus1 #bd-eb4 ,gretillat1 ,?ologie ,sy/matique1 #c3bd-abj1 has giv5 an excell5t hi/ory ( !ology1 br\ght d[n to ! pres5t "t4 ,on ! hi/ory ( ,new ,engl& !ology1 see ,fi%]1 ,discussions & ,essays1 #bhe-ced4 ,,iv4 ,ord] ( ,treatm5t 9 ,sy/ematic ,!ology4 #a4 ,v>i\s me?ods ( arrang+ ! topics ( a !ological sy/em4 7a7 ,! ,analytical me?od ( ,calixtus beg9s ) ! assum$ end ( all ?+s1 bless$ness1 & !nce passes to ! means by :i* x is secur$4 7b7 ,! ,tr9it>ian me?od ( ,leydeck] & ,m>t5s5 reg>ds ,*ri/ian doctr9e z a manife/ation successively ( ! ,fa!r1 ,son & ,holy ,_s4 7c7 ,! ,f$]al me?od ( ,cocceius1 ,witsius1 & ,bo/on treats !ology "u ! two cov5ants4 7d7 ,! ,an?ropological me?od ( ,*alm]s & ,ro!2 ! =m] beg9n+ ) ! ,disease ( ,man & pass+ to ! ,rem$y2 ! latt] divid+ 8 ,dogmatik into ! ,consci\sness ( ,s9 & ! ,consci\sness ( ,r$emption4 7e7 ,! ,*ri/ological me?od ( ,hase1 ,?omasius & ,&rew ,full] treats ( ,god1 man1 & s91 z presuppositions ( ! p]son & "w ( ,*ri/4 ,m5tion may also be made ( 7f7 ,! ,hi/orical me?od1 foll[$ by ,urs9us1 & adopt$ 9 ,jona?an ,edw>ds's ,hi/ory ( ,r$emption2 & 7g7 ,! ,allegorical me?od ( ,dannhau]1 9 :i* man is describ$ z a w&]]1 life z a road1 ! ,holy ,_s z a light1 ! *ur* z a c&le/ick1 ,god z ! end1 & heav5 z ! home2 s ,bunyan's ,holy ,w>1 & ,h[e's ,liv+ ,temple4 ,see ,calixtus1 ,epitome ,!ologi2 ,leydeck]1 ,de conomia trium ,p]son>um 9 ,negotio ,salutis human2 ,m>t5s5 7#ahjh-ahhd71 ,*ri/ian ,dogmatics2 ,cocceius1 ,summa ,!ologi1 & ,summa ,doctr9 de ,fd]e et ,te/am5to ,dei1 9 ,works1 vol4 vi2 ,witsius1 ,! ,economy ( ! ,cov5ants2 ,bo/on1 ,a ,complete ,body ( ,div9ity 79 ,works1 vol4 #a & #b71 ,que/ions 9 ,div9ity 7vol4 #f71 ,human ,nature 9 its ,f\rfold ,/ate 7vol4 #h72 ,*alm]s1 ,in/itutes ( ,!ology2 ,ro! 7#agii-ahfg71 ,dogmatik1 & ,!ologis*e ,e?ik2 ,hase 7#ahjj-ahij71 ,evangelis*e ,dogmatik2 ,?omasius 7#ahjb-ahge71 ,*ri/i ,p]son und ,w]k2 ,full]1 ,gospel ,wor?y ( all ,acceptation 79 ,works1 #b3cbh-daf71 & ,lett]s on ,sy/ematic ,div9ity 7#a3fhd-gaa72 ,urs9us 7#aecd-aehc71 ,loci ,!ologici 79 ,works1 #a3dbf-iji72 ,dannhau] 7#afjc-afff7 ,hodosophia ,*ri/iana1 seu ,!ologia ,positiva 9 ,me?odum r$acta4 ,jona?an ,edw>ds's s-call$ ,hi/ory ( ,r$emption 0 9 reality a sy/em ( !ology 9 hi/orical =m4 ,x 80 to beg9 & end ) et]nity1 all great ev5ts & epo*s 9 "t be+ view$ #8sub specie et]nitatis4' ,! ?ree worlds--heav51 e>? & hell--7 to be ! sc5es ( ?is gr& drama4 ,x 0 to include ! topics ( !ology z liv+ factors1 ea* 9 its own place10 & all =m+ a complete & h>moni\s :ole2 see ,all51 ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 #cgi1 #chj4 #b4 ,! ,syn!tic ,me?od1 :i* we adopt 9 ?is comp5dium1 is bo? ! mo/ common & ! mo/ logical me?od ( arrang+ ! topics ( !ology4 ,?is me?od proce$s f causes to effects1 or1 9 ! language ( ,hag5ba* 7,hi/4 ,doctr9e1 #b3aeb71 8/>ts f ! highe/ pr9ciple1 ,god1 & proce$s to man1 ,*ri/1 r$emption1 & f9ally to ! end ( all ?+s40 ,9 su* a treatm5t ( !ology we may be/ arrange our topics 9 ! foll[+ ord]3 #a/4 ,! exi/5ce ( ,god4 #b;d4 ,! ,scriptures a revelation f ,god4 #c;d4 ,! nature1 decrees & works ( ,god4 #d?4 ,man1 9 8 orig9al lik5ess to ,god & subsequ5t apo/asy4 #e?4 ,r$emption1 ?r\gh ! "w ( ,*ri/ & ( ! ,holy ,_s4 #f?4 ,! nature & laws ( ! ,*ri/ian *ur*4 #g?4 ,! end ( ! pres5t sy/em ( ?+s4 ,v4 ,text-,books 9 ,!ology4 #a4 ,confessions3 ,s*aff1 ,cre$s ( ,*ri/5dom4 #b4 ,comp5diums3 ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 ,sy/em ( ,*ri/ian ,!ology2 ,a4 ,a4 ,hodge1 ,outl9es ( ,!ology2 ,e4 ,h4 ,johnson1 ,outl9e ( ,sy/ematic ,!ology2 ,hovey1 ,manual ( ,!ology & ,e?ics2 ,w4 ,n4 ,cl>ke1 ,outl9e ( ,*ri/ian ,!ology2 ,hase1 ,hutt]us ,r$ivivus2 ,lu?>dt1 ,comp5dium d] ,dogmatik2 ,kurtz1 ,religionslehre4 #c4 ,ext5d$ ,treatises3 ,dorn]1 ,sy/em ( ,*ri/ian ,doctr9e2 ,%$d1 ,dogmatic ,!ology2 ,calv91 ,in/itutes2 ,*>les ,hodge1 ,sy/ematic ,!ology2 ,van ,oo/]zee1 ,*ri/ian ,dogmatics2 ,baird1 ,elohim ,reveal$2 ,lu?>dt1 ,fundam5tal1 ,sav+1 & ,moral ,tru?s2 ,phillippi1 ,glaub5slehre2 ,?omasius1 ,*ri/i ,p]son und ,w]k4 #d4 ,collect$ ,works3 ,jona?an ,edw>ds2 ,&rew ,full]4 #e4 ,hi/ories ( ,doctr9e3 ,h>nack2 ,hag5ba*2 ,%$d2 ,fi%]2 ,%eldon2 ,orr1 ,progress ( ,dogma4 #f4 ,monographs3 ,julius ,mll]1 ,doctr9e ( ,s92 ,%$d1 ,disc\rses & ,essays2 ,liddon1 ,our ,"l's ,div9ity2 ,dorn]1 ,hi/ory ( ! ,doctr9e ( ! ,p]son ( ,*ri/2 ,dale1 ,atonem5t2 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation2 ,upton1 ,hibb]t ,lectures4 #g4 ,!ism3 ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy ( ,religion2 ,h>ris1 ,philosophical ,basis ( ,!ism2 ,/rong1 ,philosophy & ,religion2 ,bruce1 ,apologetics2 ,drummond1 ,asc5t ( ,man2 ,griffi?-,jones1 ,asc5t ?r\gh ,*ri/4 #h4 ,*ri/ian ,evid5ces3 ,butl]1 ,analogy ( ,natural & ,reveal$ ,religion2 ,fi%]1 ,gr\nds ( ,!i/ic & ,*ri/ian ,belief2 ,r[1 ,bampton ,lectures = #ahgg2 ,peabody1 ,evid5ces ( ,*ri/ianity2 ,mair1 ,*ri/ian ,evid5ces2 ,fairbairn1 ,philosophy ( ! ,*ri/ian ,religion2 ,ma!son1 ,spiritual ,developm5t ( ,/4 ,paul4 #i4 ,intellectual ,philosophy3 ,/\t1 ,h&book ( ,psy*ology2 ,b[ne1 ,metaphysics2 ,port]1 ,human ,intellect2 ,hill1 ,elem5ts ( ,psy*ology2 ,dewey1 ,psy*ology4 #aj4 ,moral ,philosophy3 ,rob9son1 ,pr9ciples & ,practice ( ,morality2 ,smy?1 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics2 ,port]1 ,elem5ts ( ,moral ,sci5ce2 ,cald]wood1 ,moral ,philosophy2 ,alex&]1 ,moral ,sci5ce2 ,rob9s1 ,e?ics ( ! ,*ri/ian ,life4 #aa4 ,g5]al ,sci5ce3 ,todd1 ,a/ronomy2 ,w5twor? & ,hill1 ,physics2 ,rems51 ,*emi/ry2 ,brigham1 ,geology2 ,p>k]1 ,biology2 ,m>t91 ,physiology2 ,w>d1 ,fairbanks1 or ,we/1 ,sociology2 ,walk]1 ,political ,economy4 #ab4 ,!ological ,encyclopdias3 ,s*aff-,h]zog 7,engli%72 ,mc,clintock & ,/rong2 ,h]zog 7,second ,g]man ,edition74 #ac4 ,bible ,diction>ies3 ,ha/+s2 ,davis2 ,*eyne2 ,smi? 7edit$ by ,hackett74 #ad4 ,comm5t>ies3 ,mey]1 on ! ,new ,te/am5t2 ,philippi1 ,lange1 ,%$d1 ,s&ay1 on ! ,epi/le to ! ,romans2 ,godet1 on ,john's ,gospel2 ,lightfoot1 on ,philippians & ,colossians2 ,expositor's ,bible1 on ! ,old ,te/am5t books4 #ae4 ,bibles3 ,am]ican ,revision 7/&>d edition72 ,revis$ ,greek-,engli% ,new ,te/am5t 7publi%$ by ,h>p] ,bro!rs72 ,annotat$ ,p>agraph ,bible 7publi%$ by ! ,london ,religi\s ,tract ,society7 ,/i] & ,!ile1 ,polyglott5-,bibel4 ,an attempt has be5 made1 9 ! li/ ( text-books giv5 above1 to put fir/ 9 ea* class ! book be/ wor? pur*as+ by ! av]age !ological /ud5t1 & to arrange ! books t foll[ ?is fir/ "o 9 ! ord] ( _! value4 ,g]man books1 h[ev]1 :5 !y are n yet accessible 9 an ,engli% translation1 are put la/1 simply because !y are less likely to be us$ z books ( ref]5ce by ! av]age /ud5t4 ,,"p ,,ii4 ,,! ,,exi/5ce ,,( ,,god4 ,*apt] ,i4 ,orig9 ,( ,our ,idea ,( ,god's ,exi/5ce4 ,god is ! inf9ite & p]fect ,_s 9 :om all ?+s h _! s\rce1 support1 & end4 ,on ! def9ition ( ! t]m ,god1 see ,hodge1 ,sy/4 ,!ol41 #a3cff4 ,o!r def9itions are ^? ( ,calovius3 8,ess5tia spiritualis inf9ite02 ,ebr>d3 8,! et]nal s\rce ( all t is temporal02 ,kahnis3 8,! inf9ite ,_s02 ,john ,h[e3 8,an et]nal1 uncaus$1 indep5d5t1 necess>y ,be+1 t ha? active p[]1 life1 wisdom1 goodness1 & :atsoev] o!r supposable excell5cy1 9 ! highe/ p]fection1 9 & ( itself02 ,we/m9/] ,cate*ism3 8,a ,_s inf9ite1 et]nal & un*angeable 9 8 be+1 wisdom1 p[]1 hol9ess1 ju/ice1 goodness & tru?02 ,&rew ,full]3 8,! fir/ cause & la/ end ( all ?+s40 ,! exi/5ce ( ,god is a fir/ tru?2 9 o!r words1 ! k ( ,god's exi/5ce is a rational intuition4 ,logically1 x prec$es & conditions all obs]vation & reason+4 ,*ronologically1 only reflection ^u ! ph5om5a ( nature & ( m9d occasions its rise 9 consci\sness4 ,! t]m intuition means simply direct k4 ,l[ndes 7,philos4 ( ,prim>y ,beliefs1 #gh7 & ,mansel 7,metaphysics1 #eb7 w\ld use ! t]m only ( our direct k ( sub/ances1 z self & body2 ,port] applies x by pref]5ce to our cognition ( fir/ tru?s1 su* z h be5 already m5tion$4 ,h>ris 7,philos4 ,basis ( ,!ism1 #dd-aea1 b esp4 #de1 #df7 makes x include bo?4 ,he divides intuitions into two classes3 #a4 ,pres5tative intuitions1 z self-consci\sness 79 virtue ( :i* ,i p]ceive ! exi/5ce ( _s & already come 9 contact ) ! sup]natural71 & s5se-p]ception 79 virtue ( :i* ,i p]ceive ! exi/5ce ( matt]1 at lea/ 9 my own organism1 & come 9 contact ) nature72 #b4 ,rational intuitions1 z space1 "t1 sub/ance1 cause1 f9al cause1 "r1 absolute be+4 ,we may accept ?is nom5clature1 us+ ! t]ms 8fir/ tru?s0 & 8rational intuitions0 z equival5t to ea* o!r1 & classify+ rational intuitions "u ! heads ( 7#a7 intuitions ( relations1 z space & "t2 7#b7 intuitions ( pr9ciples1 z sub/ance1 cause1 f9al cause1 "r2 & 7#c7 intuition ( absolute ,be+1 ,p[]1 ,reason1 ,p]fection1 ,p]sonality1 z ,god4 ,we hold t1 z ^u occasion ( ! s5ses cogniz+ 7a7 ext5d$ matt]1 7b7 succession1 7c7 qualities1 7d7 *ange1 7e7 ord]1 7f7 action1 respectively1 ! m9d cognizes 7a7 space1 7b7 "t1 7c7 sub/ance1 7d7 cause1 7e7 design1 7f7 obligation1 s ^u occasion ( our cogniz+ our f9it5ess1 dep5d5ce & responsibility1 ! m9d directly cognizes ! exi/5ce ( an ,inf9ite & ,absolute ,au?ority1 ,p]fection1 ,p]sonality1 ^u :om we are dep5d5t & to :om we are responsible4 ,b[ne1 ,!ory ( ,?\ght & ,k1 #fj--8;,z we walk 9 entire ignorance ( our muscles1 s we (t5 ?9k 9 entire ignorance ( ! pr9ciples :i* und]lie & det]m9e ?9k+4 ,b z anatomy reveals t ! app>5tly simple act ( walk+ involves a highly complex muscul> activity1 s analysis reveals t ! app>5tly simple act ( ?9k+ involves a sy/em ( m5tal pr9ciples40 ,dewey1 ,psy*ology1 #bch1 #bdd--8,p]ception1 memory1 imag9ation1 conception--ea* ( ^! is an act ( intuition4444 ,e concrete act ( k involves an intuition ( ,god40 ,m>t9eau1 ,types1 #a3dei--,! attempt to dive/ exp]i5ce ( ei!r p]cepts or intuitions is 8l ! attempt to peel a bubble 9 se>* = its colors & cont5ts3 9 t5uem ex oculis evanuit auram02 ,/udy1 #a3aii--8,try ) all y\r might to d some?+ difficult1 e4 g41 to %ut a door aga9/ a furi\s w9d1 & y recognize ,self & ,nature--causal w1 ov] aga9/ ext]nal causality02 #bja--8;,h5ce our fell[-feel+ ) ,nature02 #fe--8;,z ,p]ception gives u ,w 9 ! %ape ( ,causality ov] aga9/ u 9 ! non-ego1 s ,consci5ce gives u ,w 9 ! %ape ( ,au?ority ov] aga9/ u 9 ! non-ego02 ,types1 #b3e--8;,9 p]ception x is self & nature1 9 morals x is self & ,god1 t /& face to face 9 ! subjective & objective anti!sis02 ,/udy1 #b3b1 #c--8;,9 volitional exp]i5ce we meet ) objective causality2 9 moral exp]i5ce we meet ) objective au?ority1--bo? be+ objects ( imm$iate k1 on ! same foot+ ( c]ta9ty ) ! appreh5sion ( ! ext]nal mat]ial _w4 ,i "k ( no logical advantage :i* ! belief 9 f9ite objects ar\nd u c boa/ ov] ! belief 9 ! inf9ite & righte\s ,cause ( all02 #ea--8;,9 recognition ( ,god z ,cause1 we raise ! ,univ]sity2 9 recognition ( ,god z ,au?ority1 we raise ! ,*ur*40 ,kant decl>es t ! idea ( fre$om is ! s\rce ( our idea ( p]sonality1--p]sonality consi/s 9 ! fre$om ( ! :ole s\l f ! me*anism ( nature4 ,lotze1 ,metaphysics1 #bdd--8,s f> z1 & s long z1 ! s\l kn[s itself z ! id5tical subject ( inw>d exp]i5ce1 x is1 & is nam$ simply = t reason1 sub/ance40 ,ill+wor?1 ,p]sonality1 ,human & ,div9e1 #cb--8,our conception ( sub/ance is d]iv$1 n f ! physical1 b f ! m5tal _w4 ,sub/ance is fir/ ( all t :i* und]lies our m5tal affections & manife/ations40 ,james1 ,w to ,believe1 #hj--8,sub/ance1 z ,kant says1 means #8das ,beh>rli*e1' ! abid+1 t :i* w be z x has be51 because its be+ is ess5tial & et]nal40 ,9 ?is s5se we h an intuitive belief 9 an abid+ sub/ance :i* und]lies our own ?\ghts & volitions1 & ?is we call ! s\l4 ,b we also h an intuitive belief 9 an abid+ sub/ance :i* und]lies all natural ph5om5a & all ! ev5ts ( hi/ory1 & ?is we call ,god4 ,among ^? :o hold to ?is g5]al view ( an intuitive k ( ,god may be m5tion$ ! foll[+3--,calv91 ,in/itutes1 book ,i1 *ap4 #c2 ,nitzs*1 ,sy/em ( ,*ri/ian ,doctr9e1 #ae-bf1 #acc-adj2 ,julius ,mll]1 ,doctr9e ( ,s91 #a3gh-hd2 ,ulrici1 ,leib und ,seele1 #fhh-gbe2 ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #dig2 ,hickok1 ,rational ,cosmology1 #eh-hi2 ,f>r>1 ,sci5ce 9 ,!ology1 #bg-bi2 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,july1 #ahgb3ecc1 & ,janu>y1 #ahgc3bjd2 ,mill]1 ,feti* 9 ,!ology1 #aaj-abb2 ,fi%]1 ,essays1 #efe-egb2 ,tullo*1 ,!ism1 #cad-ccf2 ,hodge1 ,sy/ematic ,!ology1 #a3aia-bjc2 ,*ri/lieb1 ,mod4 ,d\bt & ,*ri/ian ,belief1 #ge1 #gf2 ,raymond1 ,sy/4 ,!ology1 #a3bdg-bfb2 ,bascom1 ,sci5ce ( ,m9d1 #bdf1 #bdg2 ,knight1 ,/udies 9 ,philos4 & ,lit41 #aee-bbd2 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,philosophy & ,religion1 #gf-hi4 ,i4 ,fir/ ,tru?s 9 ,g5]al4 #a4 ,_! nature4 ,a4 ,negatively4--,a fir/ tru? is n 7a7 ,tru? writt5 prior to consci\sness ^u ! sub/ance ( ! s\l--= su* passive k implies a mat]iali/ic view ( ! s\l2 7b7 ,actual k ( :i* ! s\l f9ds itself 9 possession at bir?--= x _c be prov$ t ! s\l has su* k2 7c7 ,an idea1 undevelop$ at bir?1 b :i* has ! p[] ( self-developm5t ap>t f obs]vation & exp]i5ce--= ?is is contr>y to all we "k ( ! laws ( m5tal gr[?4 ,cic]o1 ,de ,natura ,deorum1 #a3ag--8;,intelligi necesse e/ esse deos1 quoniam insitas eorum vel potius innatas cogitationes habemus40 ,orig51 ,adv4 ,celsum1 #a3d--8,m5 w\ld n be guilty1 if !y did n c>ry 9 _! m9ds common notions ( morality1 innate & writt5 9 div9e lett]s40 ,calv91 ,in/itutes1 #a3c3c--8,^? :o rightly judge w always agree t !re is an indelible s5se ( div9ity engrav5 ^u m5's m9ds40 ,flem+1 ,vocab4 ( ,philosophy1 art43 8,innate ,ideas0--8,desc>tes is suppos$ to h taught 7& ,locke devot$ ! fir/ book ( 8 ,essays to refut+ ! doctr9e7 t ^! ideas are innate or connate ) ! s\l2 i4 e41 ! intellect f9ds itself at bir?1 or z soon z x wakes to consci\s activity1 to be possess$ ( ideas to :i* x has only to atta* ! appropriate names1 or ( judgm5ts :i* x only ne$s to express 9 fit propositions--i4 e41 prior to any exp]i5ce ( individual objects40 ,royce1 ,_s ( ,mod]n ,philosophy1 #gg--8;,9 c]ta9 families1 ,desc>tes tea*es1 good bre$+ & ! g\t are innate4 ,yet1 ( c\rse1 ! *ildr5 ( su* families h to be in/ruct$ 9 deportm5t1 & ! infants j le>n+ to walk seem happily q free f g\t4 ,ev5 s geometry is innate 9 u1 b x does n come to our consci\sness )\t mu* tr\ble02 #gi--,locke f\nd no innate ideas4 ,he ma9ta9$1 9 reply1 t 8infants1 ) _! rattles1 %[$ no sign ( be+ aw>e t ?+s :i* are equal to ! same ?+ are equal to ea* o!r40 ,s*op5hau] said t 8,jacobi _h ! trifl+ weakness ( tak+ all he _h le>n$ & approv$ be=e 8 fifte5? ye> = inborn ideas ( ! human m9d40 ,b[ne1 ,pr9ciples ( ,e?ics1 #e--8,t ! rational ideas are condition$ by ! s5se exp]i5ce & are sequ5t to x1 is unque/ion$ by any "o2 & t exp]i5ce %[s a successive ord] ( manife/ation is equally und\bt$4 ,b ! s5sationali/ has always %[n a curi\s bl9dness to ! ambiguity ( su* a fact4 ,he w h x t :at comes aft] mu/ be a modification ( :at w5t be=e2 :]eas x might be t1 & x might be a new1 ?\gh condition$1 manife/ation ( an imman5t nature or law4 ,*emical aff9ity is n gravity1 al?\gh aff9ity _c manife/ itself until gravity has br\ght ! elem5ts into c]ta9 relations40 ,pfleid]]1 ,philosophy ( ,religion1 #a3ajc--8,?is pr9ciple 0 n f ! beg9n+ 9 ! consci\sness ( m52 =1 9 ord] to ?9k ideas1 reason mu/ be cle>ly develop$1 :i* 9 ! fir/ ( mank9d x c\ld j z little be z 9 *ildr54 ,?is h[ev] does n exclude ! fact t !re 0 f ! beg9n+ ! unconsci\s rational impulse :i* lay at ! basis ( ! =mation ( ! belief 9 ,god1 h[ev] manifold may h be5 ! direct motives :i* co-op]at$ ) x40 ,self is impli$ 9 ! simple/ act ( k4 ,s5sation gives u two ?+s1 e4 g41 black & :ite2 b ,i _c comp>e !m )\t ass]t+ diff]5ce = me4 ,diff]5t s5sations make no k1 )\t a self to br+ !m toge!r4 ,upton1 ,hibb]t ,lectures1 lecture #b--8,y c\ld z easily prove ! exi/5ce ( an ext]nal _w to a man :o _h no s5ses to p]ceive x1 z y c\ld prove ! exi/5ce ( ,god to "o :o _h no consci\sness ( ,god40 ,b4 ,positively4--,a fir/ tru? is a k :i*1 ?\gh develop$ ^u occasion ( obs]vation & reflection1 is n d]iv$ f obs]vation & reflection1--a k on ! contr>y :i* has su* logical priority t x mu/ be assum$ or suppos$1 9 ord] to make any obs]vation or reflection possible4 ,su* tru?s are n1 !re=e1 recogniz$ fir/ 9 ord] ( "t2 "s ( !m are ass5t$ to some:at late 9 ! m9d's gr[?2 by ! great majority ( m5 !y are nev] consci\sly =mulat$ at all4 ,yet !y con/itute ! necess>y assumptions ^u :i* all o!r k re/s1 & ! m9d has n only ! inborn capacity to evolve !m s soon z ! prop] occasions are pres5t$1 b ! recognition ( !m is inevitable s soon z ! m9d beg9s to give acc\nt to itself ( its own k4 ,mansel1 ,metaphysics1 #eb1 #bgi--8,to describe exp]i5ce z ! cause ( ! idea ( space w\ld be z inaccurate z to speak ( ! soil 9 :i* x 0 plant$ z ! cause ( ! oak--?\gh ! plant+ 9 ! soil is ! condition :i* br+s into manife/ation ! lat5t p[] ( ! acorn40 ,col]idge3 8,we see be=e we "k t we h eyes2 b :5 once ?is is kn[n1 we p]ceive t eyes mu/ h prexi/$ 9 ord] to enable u to see40 ,col]idge speaks ( fir/ tru?s z 8^? necessities ( m9d or =ms ( ?9k+1 :i*1 ?\gh reveal$ to u by exp]i5ce1 mu/ yet h prexi/$ 9 ord] to make exp]i5ce possible40 ,mc,cosh1 ,intuitions1 #dh1 #di--;,intuitions are 8l fl[] & fruit1 :i* are 9 ! plant f its embryo1 b may n be actually =m$ till !re h be5 a /alk & bran*es & leaves40 ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #eja1 #eai--8,su* tru?s _c be acquir$ or ass5t$ to fir/ ( all40 ,"s are rea*$ la/ ( all4 ,! moral intuition is (t5 develop$ late1 & sometimes1 ev5 !n1 only ^u occasion ( corporal puni%m5t4 8,e man is z lazy z circum/ances w admit40 ,our physical laz9ess is occasional2 our m5tal laz9ess frequ5t2 our moral laz9ess incessant4 ,we are too lazy to ?9k1 & especially to ?9k ( religion4 ,on acc\nt ( ?is depravity ( human nature we %\ld expect ! intuition ( ,god to be develop$ la/ ( all4 ,m5 %r9k f contact ) ,god & f ! ?\ght ( ,god4 ,9 fact1 _! dislike = ! intuition ( ,god leads !m n seldom to d5y all _! o!r intuitions1 ev5 ^? ( fre$om & ( "r4 ,h5ce ! mod]n 8psy*ology )\t a s\l40 ,s*urman1 ,agno/icism & ,religion1 #aje-aae--8,! idea ( ,god 444 is late/ to develop into cle> consci\sness 444 & mu/ be late/1 = x is ! unity ( ! diff]5ce ( ! self & ! n-self1 :i* are !re=e presuppos$40 ,b 8x has n less validity 9 itself1 x gives no less tru/wor?y assurance ( actuality1 ?an ! consci\sness ( ! self1 or ! consci\sness ( ! n-self4444 ,! consci\sness ( ,god is ! logical prius ( ! consci\sness ( self & ( ! _w4 ,b n1 z already obs]v$1 ! *ronological2 =1 accord+ to ! pr(\nd obs]vation ( ,ari/otle1 :at 9 ! nature ( ?+s is fir/1 is 9 ! ord] ( developm5t la/4 ,j because ,god is ! fir/ pr9ciple ( be+ & kn[+1 he is ! la/ to be manife/$ & kn[n4444 ,! f9ite & ! inf9ite are bo? kn[n toge!r1 & x is z impossible to "k "o )\t ! o!r z x is to appreh5d an angle )\t ! sides :i* conta9 x40 ,= acc\nt ( ! relation ( ! intuitions to exp]i5ce1 see especially ,c\s91 ,true1 ,beautiful & ,good1 #ci-fd1 & ,hi/ory ( ,philosophy1 #b3aii-bde4 ,comp>e ,kant1 ,critique ( ,pure ,reason1 ,introd41 #a4 ,see also ,bascom1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #bc3a-dg2 #bg3fh-ij4 #b4 ,_! crit]ia4 ,! crit]ia by :i* fir/ tru?s are to be te/$ are ?ree3 ,a4 ,_! univ]sality4 ,by ?is we mean1 n t all m5 ass5t to !m or und]/& !m :5 prop\nd$ 9 sci5tific =m1 b t all m5 manife/ a practical belief 9 !m by _! language1 actions1 & expectations4 ,b4 ,_! necessity4 ,by ?is we mean1 n t x is impossible to d5y ^! tru?s1 b t ! m9d is compell$ by its v con/itution to recognize !m ^u ! occurr5ce ( ! prop] conditions1 & to employ !m 9 its argum5ts to prove _! non-exi/5ce4 ,c4 ,_! logical indep5d5ce & priority4 ,by ?is we mean t ^! tru?s c be resolv$ into no o!rs1 & prov$ by no o!rs2 t !y are presuppos$ 9 ! acquisition ( all o!r k1 & c !re=e be d]iv$ f no o!r s\rce ?an an orig9al cognitive p[] ( ! m9d4 ,in/ances ( ! pr(ess$ & =mal d5ial ( fir/ tru?s3--! positivi/ d5ies causality2 ! ideali/ d5ies sub/ance2 ! pan!i/ d5ies p]sonality2 ! necessit>ian d5ies fre$om2 ! nihili/ d5ies 8 own exi/5ce4 ,a man may 9 l mann] argue t !re is no necessity = an atmosph]e2 b ev5 :ile he argues1 he brea!s x4 ,in/ance ! knock-d[n argum5t to demon/rate ! fre$om ( ! w4 ,i grant my own exi/5ce 9 ! v d\bt+ ( x2 = 8cogito1 ergo sum10 z ,desc>tes himself insi/$1 really means 8cogito1 scilicet sum02 ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?3 8,! /atem5t is analysis1 n pro(40 ,ladd1 ,philosophy ( ,k1 #ei--8,! cogito1 9 b>b>\s ,lat9 cogitans sum3 ?9k+ is self-consci\s be+40 ,b5?am3 8,! ^w ought is an au?oritative impo/ure1 & ought to be bani%$ f ! realm ( morals40 ,sp9oza & ,hegel really d5y self-consci\sness :5 !y make man a ph5om5on ( ! inf9ite4 ,royce lik5s ! d5i] ( p]sonality to ! man :o goes outside ( 8 own h\se & decl>es t no "o lives !re because1 :5 he looks 9 at ! w9d[1 he sees no "o inside4 ,pr(essor ,james1 9 8 ,psy*ology1 assumes ! reality ( a bra91 b refuses to assume ! reality ( a s\l4 ,?is is ess5tially ! position ( mat]ialism4 ,b ?is assumption ( a bra9 is metaphysics1 al?\gh ! au?or claims to be writ+ a psy*ology )\t metaphysics4 ,ladd1 ,philosophy ( ,m9d1 #c--8,! mat]iali/ believes 9 causation prop] s long z he is expla9+ ! orig9 ( m9d f matt]1 b :5 he is ask$ to see 9 m9d ! cause ( physical *ange he at once becomes a m]e ph5om5ali/40 ,royce1 ,_s ( ,mod]n ,philosophy1 #djj--8;,i "k t all be+s1 if only !y c c\nt1 mu/ f9d t ?ree & two make five4 ,p]haps ! angels _c c\nt2 b1 if !y c1 ?is axiom is true = !m4 ,if ,i met an angel :o decl>$ t 8 exp]i5ce _h occasionally %[n him a ?ree & two t did n make five1 ,i %\ld "k at once :at sort ( an angel he 040 ,on ! crit]ia ( fir/ tru?s1 see ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #eaj1 #eaa4 ,on d5ial ( !m1 see ,%$d1 ,dogmatic ,!ology1 #a3bac4 ,,ii4 ,! ,exi/5ce ( ,god a fir/ tru?4 #a4 ,its univ]sality4 ,t ! k ( ,god's exi/5ce answ]s ! fir/ crit]ion ( univ]sality1 is evid5t f ! foll[+ consid]ations3 ,a4 ,x is an ackn[l$g$ fact t ! va/ majority ( m5 h actually recogniz$ ! exi/5ce ( a spiritual be+ or be+s1 ^u :om !y conceiv$ !mselves to be dep5d5t4 ,! ,v$as decl>e3 8,!re is b "o ,be+--no second40 ,max ,mll]1 ,orig9 & ,gr[? ( ,religion1 #cd--8,n ! visible sun1 moon & />s are invok$1 b some?+ else t _c be se540 ,! l[e/ tribes h consci5ce1 fe> dea?1 believe 9 wit*es1 propitiate or fright5 away evil fates4 ,ev5 ! feti*-wor%ip]1 :o calls ! /one or ! tree a god1 %[s t he has already ! idea ( a ,god4 ,we mu/ n measure ! ideas ( ! hea!n by _! capacity = expression1 any m ?an we %\ld judge ! *ild's belief 9 ! exi/5ce ( 8 fa!r by 8 success 9 draw+ ! fa!r's picture4 ,on hea!nism1 its orig9 & nature1 see ,?oluck1 9 ,bib4 ,repos41 #ahcb3hf2 ,s*olz1 ,gtz5di5/ und ,zaub]wes54 ,b4 ,^? races & nations :i* h at fir/ seem$ de/itute ( su* k h uni=mly1 ^u fur!r inve/igation1 be5 f\nd to possess x1 s t no tribe ( m5 ) :i* we h ?or\gh acqua9tance c be said to be )\t an object ( wor%ip4 ,we may presume t fur!r k w %[ ?is to be true ( all4 ,m(fat1 :o report$ t c]ta9 ,african tribes 7 de/itute ( religion1 0 correct$ by ! te/imony ( 8 son-9-law1 ,liv+/one3 8,! exi/5ce ( ,god & ( a future life is ev]y:]e recogniz$ 9 ,africa40 ,:]e m5 are mo/ ne>ly de/itute ( any =mulat$ k ( ,god1 ! conditions = ! awak5+ ( ! idea are mo/ ne>ly abs5t4 ,an apple-tree may be s condition$ t x nev] be>s apples4 8,we d n judge ( ! oak by ! /unt$1 fl[]less specim5s on ! edge ( ! ,arctic ,circle40 ,! pres5ce ( an occasional bl9d1 deaf or dumb man does n disprove ! def9ition t man is a see+1 he>+ & speak+ creature4 ,b[ne1 ,pr9ciples ( ,e?ics1 #aed--8,we ne$ n tremble = ma!matics1 ev5 if "s tribes %\ld be f\nd )\t ! multiplication-table4444 ,sub-moral & sub-rational exi/5ce is always ) u 9 ! case ( "y *ildr52 &1 if we %\ld f9d x else:]e1 x w\ld h no great] significance40 ,victor ,hugo3 8,"s m5 d5y ! ,inf9ite2 "s1 too1 d5y ! sun2 !y are ! bl9d40 ,gladd51 ,:at is ,left8 #adh--8;,a man may escape f 8 %ad[ by go+ into ! d>k2 if he comes "u ! light ( ! sun1 ! %ad[ is !re4 ,a man may be s m5tally undiscipl9$ t he does n recognize ^! ideas2 b let him le>n ! use ( 8 reason1 let him reflect on 8 own m5tal processes1 & he w "k t !y are necess>y ideas40 ,on an orig9al mono!ism1 see ,die/el1 9 ,jahrbu* fr deuts*e ,!ologie1 #ahfj1 & vol4 #e3ffi2 ,max ,mll]1 ,*ips1 #a3ccg2 ,rawl9son1 9 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 ,no4 #aa2 ,legge1 ,religions ( ,*9a1 #h-aa2 ,%$d1 ,dogmatic ,!ology1 #a3bja-bjh4 ,p] contra1 see ,asmus1 ,indog]m4 ,relig41 #b3a-h2 & synopsis 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,jan4 #ahgg3afg-agb4 ,c4 ,?is conclusion is corroborat$ by ! fact t ^? individuals1 9 hea!n or 9 ,*ri/ian l&s1 :o pr(ess !mselves to be )\t any k ( a spiritual p[] or p[]s above !m1 d yet indirectly manife/ ! exi/5ce ( su* an idea 9 _! m9ds & its positive influ5ce ov] !m4 ,comte said t sci5ce w\ld conduct ,god to ! fronti] & !n b[ him out1 ) ?anks = 8 provisional s]vices4 ,b ,h]b]t ,sp5c] affirms ! exi/5ce ( a 8,p[] to :i* no limit 9 "t or space is conceivable1 ( :i* all ph5om5a z pres5t$ 9 consci\sness are manife/ations40 ,! intuition ( ,god1 ?\gh =mally exclud$1 is implicitly conta9$ 9 ,sp5c]'s sy/em1 9 ! %ape ( ! 8irresi/ible belief0 9 ,absolute ,be+1 :i* di/+ui%es 8 position f t ( ,comte2 see ,h4 ,sp5c]1 :o says3 8,"o tru? mu/ ev] gr[ cle>]--! tru? t !re is an inscrutable exi/5ce ev]y:]e manife/$1 to :i* we c nei!r f9d nor conceive beg9n+ or end--! "o absolute c]ta9ty t we are ev] 9 ! pres5ce ( an inf9ite & et]nal en]gy f :i* all ?+s proce$40 ,mr4 ,sp5c] assumes unity 9 ! und]ly+ ,reality4 ,fr$]ick ,h>rison sne]+ly asks him3 8,:y n say #8=ces1' in/ead ( #8=ce'80 ,:ile ,h>rison gives u a supreme moral ideal )\t a metaphysical gr\nd1 ,sp5c] gives u an ultimate metaphysical pr9ciple )\t a f9al moral purpose4 ,! idea ( ,god is ! syn!sis ( ! two1--8,!y are b brok5 lights ( ,!e1 ,& ?\1 ,o ,"l1 art m ?an !y0 7,t5nyson1 ,9 ,memoriam74 ,solon spoke ( & ( 1 & ,sophocles ( 4 ,! t]m = 8,god0 is id5tical 9 all ! ,indo-,european languages1 & !re=e belong$ to ! "t be=e ^? languages sep>at$2 see ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3bja-bjh4 ,9 ,virgil's neid1 ,mez5tius is an a!i/1 a despis] ( ! gods1 tru/+ only 9 8 spe> & 9 8 "r arm2 b1 :5 ! corpse ( 8 son is br\ght to him1 8 fir/ act is to raise 8 h&s to heav54 ,hume 0 a sceptic1 b he said to ,f]guson1 z !y walk$ on a />ry night3 8,adam1 !re is a ,god60 ,voltaire pray$ 9 an ,alp9e ?und]/orm4 ,%elley wrote 8 "n 9 ! visitors' book ( ! inn at ,montanv]t1 & add$3 8,democrat1 philan?ropi/1 a!i/02 yet he lov$ to ?9k ( a 8f9e intellectual _s p]vad+ ! univ]se02 & he also wrote3 8,! ,"o rema9s1 ! _m *ange & pass2 ,heav5's light =ev] %9es1 ,e>?'s %ad[s fly40 ,/rauss wor%ips ! ,cosmos1 because 8ord] & law1 reason & goodness0 are ! s\l ( x4 ,r5an tru/s 9 goodness1 design1 ends4 ,*>les ,d>w91 ,life1 #a3bgd--8;,9 my mo/ extreme fluctuations1 ,i h nev] be5 an a!i/1 9 ! s5se ( d5y+ ! exi/5ce ( a ,god40 ,d4 ,?is agreem5t among individuals & nations s widely sep>at$ 9 "t & place c be mo/ satisfactorily expla9$ by suppos+ t x has its gr\nd1 n 9 accid5tal circum/ances1 b 9 ! nature ( man z man4 ,! div]se & imp]fectly develop$ ideas ( ! supreme ,be+ :i* prevail among m5 are be/ acc\nt$ = z mis9t]pretations & p]v]sions ( an intuitive conviction common to all4 ,huxley1 ,lay ,s]mons1 #afc--8,!re are savages )\t ,god1 9 any prop] s5se ( ! ^w2 b !re are none )\t gho/s40 ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy1 #b3cec1 well replies3 8,in/ead ( turn+ o!r p into gho/s1 & !n appropriat+ "o to ourselves & attribut+ ano!r to ,god1 we may add by way ( imitation1 we />t f ! s5se ( p]sonal cont9uity1 & !n pr$icate ! same ( o!rs1 "u ! figures :i* keep mo/ cle> ( ! physical & p]i%able40 ,grant ,all5 describes ! high] religions z 8a grotesque fungoid gr[?10 t has ga!r$ ab\t a primitive ?read ( ance/or-wor%ip4 ,b ?is is to d]ive ! great] f ! less4 ,sayce1 ,hibb]t ,lectures1 #ceh--8;,i c f9d no trace ( ance/or-wor%ip 9 ! e>lie/ lit]ature ( ,babylonia :i* has surviv$ to u0--?is seems fatal to ,huxley's & ,all5's view t ! idea ( ,god is d]iv$ f man's prior belief 9 spirits ( ! dead4 ,c4 ,m4 ,tyl]1 9 ,am4 ,j\r4 ,!o41 ,jan4 #ahii3add--8;,x seems impossible to deify a dead man1 unless !re is embryonic 9 primitive consci\sness a prior concept ( ,deity40 ,r5\f1 ,religion ( ,anci5t ,egypt1 #ic--8,! :ole my?ology ( ,egypt 444 turns on ! hi/ories ( ,ra & ,osiris4444 ,texts are discov]$ :i* id5tify ,osiris & ,ra4444 ,o!r texts are kn[n :]e9 ,ra1 ,osiris1 ,amon1 & all o!r gods disappe>1 except z simple names1 & ! unity ( ,god is ass]t$ 9 ! noble/ language ( mono!i/ic religion40 ,^! facts are e>li] ?an any kn[n ance/or-wor%ip4 8,!y po9t to an orig9al idea ( div9ity above humanity0 7see ,hill1 ,g5etic ,philosophy1 #cag74 ,we mu/ add ! idea ( ! sup]human1 be=e we c turn any animism or ance/or-wor%ip into a religion4 ,?is sup]human elem5t 0 sugge/$ to e>ly man by all he saw ( nature ab\t him1 especially by ! sight ( ! heav5s above1 & by :at he knew ( causality )94 ,= ! evid5ce ( a univ]sal recognition ( a sup]ior p[]1 see ,fl9t1 ,anti-!i/ic ,!ories1 #bej-bhi1 #ebb-ecc2 ,r5\f1 ,hibb]t ,lectures = #ahgi3ajj2 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,jan4 #ahhd3acb-aeg2 ,pes*el1 ,races ( ,m51 #bfa2 ,ulrici1 ,leib und ,seele1 #fhh1 & ,gott und die ,natur1 #feh-fgj1 #geh2 ,tylor1 ,primitive ,culture1 #a3cgg1 #cha1 #dah2 ,alex&]1 ,evid5ces ( ,*ri/ianity1 #bb2 ,cald]wood1 ,philosophy ( ! ,inf9ite1 #eab2 ,liddon1 ,elem5ts ( ,religion1 #ej2 ,me?odi/ ,qu>4 ,rev41 ,jan4 #ahge3a2 ,j4 ,f4 ,cl>k1 ,t5 ,great ,religions1 #b3ag-ba4 #b4 ,its necessity4 ,t ! k ( ,god's exi/5ce answ]s ! second crit]ion ( necessity1 w be se5 by consid]+3 ,a4 ,t m51 "u circum/ances fitt$ to call =? ?is k1 _c avoid recogniz+ ! exi/5ce ( ,god4 ,9 contemplat+ f9ite exi/5ce1 !re is inevitably sugge/$ ! idea ( an inf9ite ,be+ z its correlative4 ,^u occasion ( ! m9d's p]ceiv+ its own f9it5ess1 dep5d5ce1 responsibility1 x imm$iately & necess>ily p]ceives ! exi/5ce ( an inf9ite & uncondition$ ,be+ ^u :om x is dep5d5t & to :om x is responsible4 ,we c\ld n recognize ! f9ite z f9ite1 except by comp>+ x ) an already exi/+ /&>d--! ,inf9ite4 ,mansel1 ,limits ( ,religi\s ,?\ght1 lect4 #c--8,we are compell$ by ! con/itution ( our m9ds to believe 9 ! exi/5ce ( an ,absolute & ,inf9ite ,be+--a belief :i* appe>s =c$ ^u u z ! complem5t ( our consci\sness ( ! relative & f9ite40 ,fi%]1 ,j\rn4 ,*r4 ,philos41 ,jan4 #ahhc3aac--8;,ego & non-ego1 ea* be+ condition$ by ! o!r1 presuppose uncondition$ be+ on :i* bo? are dep5d5t4 ,uncondition$ be+ is ! sil5t presupposition ( all our kn[+40 ,p]ceiv$ dep5d5t be+ implies an indep5d5t2 indep5d5t be+ is p]fectly self-det]m9+2 self-det]m9ation is p]sonality2 p]fect self-det]m9ation is inf9ite ,p]sonality4 ,john ,watson1 9 ,philos4 ,rev41 ,sept4 #ahic3ebf--8,!re is no consci\sness ( self ap>t f ! consci\sness ( o!r selves & ?+s2 & no consci\sness ( ! _w ap>t f ! consci\sness ( ! s+le ,reality presuppos$ 9 bo?40 ,e4 ,caird1 ,evolution ( ,religion1 #fd-fh--;,9 e act ( consci\sness ! prim>y elem5ts are impli$3 8! idea ( ! object1 or n-self2 ! idea ( ! subject1 or self2 & ! idea ( ! unity :i* is presuppos$ 9 ! diff]5ce ( ! self & n-self1 & )9 :i* !y act & react on ea* o!r40 ,see ,cald]wood1 ,philos4 ( ,inf9ite1 #df1 & ,moral ,philos41 #gg2 ,hopk9s1 ,outl9e ,/udy ( ,man1 #bhc-bhe2 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3baa4 ,b4 ,t m51 9 virtue ( _! humanity1 h a capacity = religion4 ,?is recogniz$ capacity = religion is pro( t ! idea ( ,god is a necess>y "o4 ,if ! m9d ^u prop] occasion did n evolve ?is idea1 !re w\ld be no?+ 9 man to :i* religion c\ld appeal4 8,x is ! sugge/ion ( ! ,inf9ite t makes ! l9e ( ! f> horizon1 se5 ov] l& or sea1 s mu* m impressive ?an ! beauties ( any limit$ l&scape40 ,9 times ( sudd5 %ock & dang]1 ?is rational intuition becomes a pres5tative intuition1--m5 become m consci\s ( ,god's exi/5ce ?an ( ! exi/5ce ( _! fell[-m5 & !y in/9ctively cry to ,god = help4 ,9 ! comm&s & reproa*es ( ! moral nature ! s\l recognizes a ,lawgiv] & ,judge ^: voice consci5ce m]ely e*oes4 ,ari/otle call$ man 8a political animal02 x is /ill m true1 z ,sabati] decl>es1 t 8man is incurably religi\s40 ,/4 ,b]n>d3 8,nov]im me1 nov]im te40 ,o4 ,p4 ,gif=d3 8,z milk1 f :i* "u prop] conditions cream does n rise1 is n milk1 s ! man1 :o ^u prop] occasion %[s no k ( ,god1 is n man1 b brute40 ,we mu/ n h[ev] expect cream f froz5 milk4 ,prop] environm5t & conditions are ne$$4 ,x is ! recognition ( a div9e ,p]sonality 9 nature :i* con/itutes ! greate/ m]it & *>m ( ,wordswor?'s poetry4 ,9 8 ,t9t]n ,abbey1 he speaks ( 8,a pres5ce t di/urbs me ) ! joy ,( elevat$ ?\ghts2 a s5se sublime ,( some?+ f> m deeply int]fus$1 ,^: dwell+ is ! light ( sett+ suns1 ,& ! r\nd ocean & ! liv+ air1 ,& ! blue sky & 9 ! m9d ( man3 ,a motion & a _s t impels ,all ?9k+ ?+s1 all objects ( all ?\ght1 ,& rolls ?r\gh all ?+s40 ,rob]t ,br[n+ sees ,god 9 humanity1 z ,wordswor? sees ,god 9 nature4 ,9 8 ,hoh5/iel-,s*wangau he writes3 8,?is is ! glory1 t 9 all conceiv$ ,or felt or kn[n1 ,i recognize a ,m9d--,n m9e1 b l m9e--= ! d\ble joy ,mak+ all ?+s = me1 & me = ,him40 ,john ,rusk9 held t ! f\ndation ( beauty 9 ! _w is ! pres5ce ( ,god 9 x4 ,9 8 y\? he tells u t he _h 8a cont9ual p]ception ( sanctity 9 ! :ole ( nature1 f ! slighte/ ?+ to ! va/e/--an in/9ctive awe mix$ ) delight1 an indef9able ?rill su* z we sometimes imag9e to indicate ! pres5ce ( a disembodi$ _s40 ,b x 0 n a disembodi$1 b an embodi$1 ,_s t he saw4 ,nitzs*1 ,*ri/ian ,doctr9e1 #g--8,unless education & culture 7 prec$$ by an innate consci\sness ( ,god z an op]ative pr$isposition1 !re w\ld be no?+ = education & culture to "w ^u40 ,on ,wordswor?'s recognition ( a div9e p]sonality 9 nature1 see ,knight1 ,/udies1 #bhb-cag1 #dje-dbf2 ,hutton1 ,essays1 #b3aac4 ,c4 ,t he :o d5ies ,god's exi/5ce mu/ tacitly assume t exi/5ce 9 8 v argum5t1 by employ+ logical processes ^: validity re/s ^u ! fact ( ,god's exi/5ce4 ,! full pro( ( ?is belongs "u ! next head4 8,i am an a!i/1 ,god kn[s0--0 ! absurd beg9n+ ( an argum5t to disprove ! div9e exi/5ce4 ,cutl]1 ,beg9n+s ( ,e?ics1 #bb--8;,ev5 ! ,nihili/s1 ^: fir/ pr9ciple is t ,god & duty are great bugbe>s to be aboli%$1 assume t ,god & duty exi/1 & !y are impell$ by a s5se ( duty to aboli% !m40 ,mrs4 ,br[n+1 ,! ,cry ( ! ,human3 8 #8,!re is no ,god1' ! fooli% sai?2 ,b none1 #8,!re is no sorr['2 ,& nature (t ! cry ( fai? ,9 bitt] ne$ w borr[3 ,eyes :i* ! prea*] c\ld n s*ool ,by wayside graves are rais$2 ,& lips say1 #8,god be pitiful1' ,:o ne'er said1 #8,god be prais$4' 0 ,dr4 ,w4 ,w4 ,ke51 :5 call$ to treat an ,iri%man's aphasia1 said3 8,well1 ,d5nis1 h[ are y80 8,oh1 doctor1 ,i _c spake60 8,b1 ,d5nis1 y are speak+40 8,oh1 doctor1 x's _m a ^w ,i _c spake60 8,well1 ,d5nis1 n[ ,i w try y4 ,see if y _c say1 #8,horse4' 0 8,oh1 doctor de>1 #8horse' is ! v ^w ,i _c spake60 ,on ?is :ole section1 see ,a4 ,m4 ,fairbairn1 ,orig9 & ,developm5t ( ! ,idea ( ,god1 9 ,/udies 9 ,philos4 ( ,relig4 & ,hi/ory2 ,m>t9eau1 ,religion & ,mat]ialism1 #de2 ,bi%op ,temple1 ,bampton ,lectures1 #ahhd3cg-fe4 #c4 ,its logical indep5d5ce & priority4 ,t ! k ( ,god's exi/5ce answ]s ! ?ird crit]ion ( logical indep5d5ce & priority1 may be %[n z foll[s3 ,a4 ,x is presuppos$ 9 all o!r k z its logical condition & f\ndation4 ,! validity ( ! simple/ m5tal acts1 su* z s5se-p]ception1 self-consci\sness1 & memory1 dep5ds ^u ! assumption t a ,god exi/s :o has s con/itut$ our m9ds t !y give u k ( ?+s z !y are4 ,pfleid]]1 ,philos4 ( ,religion1 #a3hh--8,! gr\nd ( sci5ce & ( cognition g5]ally is to be f\nd nei!r 9 ! subject nor 9 ! object p] se1 b only 9 ! div9e ?9k+ t comb9es ! two1 :i*1 z ! common gr\nd ( ! =ms ( ?9k+ 9 all f9ite m9ds1 & ( ! =ms ( be+ 9 all ?+s1 makes possible ! correspond5ce or agreem5t betwe5 ! =m] & ! latt]1 or 9 a ^w makes k ( tru? possible40 #ia--8,religi\s belief is presuppos$ 9 all sci5tific k z ! basis ( its possibility40 ,?is is ! ?\ght ( ,psalm #cf3aj--8;,9 ?y light %all we see light40 ,a4 ,j4 ,balf\r1 ,f\ndations ( ,belief1 #cjc--8,! uni=mity ( nature _c be prov$ f exp]i5ce1 = x is :at makes pro( f exp]i5ce possible4444 ,assume x1 & we %all f9d t facts con=m to x4444 #cji--,! uni=mity ( nature c be e/abli%$ only by ! aid ( t pr9ciple itself1 & is necess>ily involv$ 9 all attempts to prove x4444 ,!re mu/ be a ,god1 to ju/ify our confid5ce 9 innate ideas40 ,b[ne1 ,!ory ( ,?\ght & ,k1 #bgf--8,reflection %[s t ! community ( individual intellig5ces is possible only ?r\gh an all-embrac+ ,intellig5ce1 ! s\rce & creator ( f9ite m9ds40 ,sci5ce re/s ^u ! po/ulate ( a _w-ord]4 ,huxley3 8,! object ( sci5ce is ! discov]y ( ! rational ord] :i* p]vades ! univ]se40 ,?is rational ord] presupposes a rational ,au?or4 ,dubois1 9 ,new ,engl&]1 ,nov4 #ahij3dfh--8,we assume uni=mity & cont9uity1 or we c h no sci5ce4 ,an intellig5t ,creative ,w is a g5u9e sci5tific hypo!sis po/ulate81 sugge/$ by analogy & confirm$ by exp]i5ce1 n contradict+ ! fundam5tal law ( uni=mity b acc\nt+ = x40 ,rit*ie1 ,d>w9 & ,hegel1 #ah--8,t nature is a sy/em1 is ! assumption und]ly+ ! e>lie/ my?ologies3 to fill up ?is conception is ! aim ( ! late/ sci5ce40 ,royce1 ,relig4 ,aspect ( ,philosophy1 #dce--8,!re is su* a ?+ z error2 b error is inconceivable unless !re be su* a ?+ z tru?2 & tru? is inconceivable unless !re be a seat ( tru?1 an inf9ite all-includ+ ,?\ght or ,m9d2 !re=e su* a ,m9d exi/s40 ,b4 ,! m complex processes ( ! m9d1 su* z induction & d$uction1 c be reli$ on only by presuppos+ a ?9k+ ,deity :o has made ! v>i\s p>ts ( ! univ]se & ! v>i\s aspects ( tru? to correspond to ea* o!r & to ! inve/igat+ faculties ( man4 ,we argue f "o apple to ! o!rs on ! tree4 ,newton argu$ f ! fall ( an apple to gravitation 9 ! moon & ?r\gh\t ! sol> sy/em4 ,r[l& argu$ f ! *emi/ry ( our _w to t ( ,sirius4 ,9 all su* argum5t !re is assum$ a unify+ ?\ght & a ?9k+ ,deity4 ,?is is ,tyndall's 8sci5tific use ( ! imag9ation40 8,n\ri%$10 he says1 8by k p>tially won1 & b\nd$ by cop]ant reason1 imag9ation is ! mightie/ in/rum5t ( ! physical discov]]40 ,:at ,tyndall calls 8imag9ation01 is really insight into ! ?\ghts ( ,god1 ! great ,?9k]4 ,x prep>es ! way = logical reason+1--x is n ! product ( m]e reason+4 ,= ?is reason ,goe! call$ imag9ation 8die ,vors*ule des ,d5k5s10 or 8?\ght's prep>atory s*ool40 ,peabody1 ,*ri/ianity ! ,religion ( ,nature1 #bc--8;,induction is syllogism1 ) ! immutable attributes ( ,god = a con/ant t]m40 ,port]1 ,hum4 ,intellect1 #dib--8;,induction re/s ^u ! assumption1 z x dem&s = its gr\nd1 t a p]sonal or ?9k+ ,deity exi/s02 #feh--8;,x has no mean+ or validity unless we assume t ! univ]se is con/itut$ 9 su* a way z to presuppose an absolute & uncondition$ orig9ator ( its =ces & laws02 #ffb--8,we analyze ! sev]al processes ( k into _! und]ly+ assumptions1 & we f9d t ! assumption :i* und]lies !m all is t ( a self-exi/5t ,intellig5ce :o n only c be kn[n by man1 b mu/ be kn[n by man 9 ord] t man may "k any?+ besides02 see also pages #dhf1 #ejh1 #eji1 #eah1 #eai1 #ehe1 #faf4 ,h>ris1 ,philos4 ,basis ( ,!ism1 #ha--8,! processes ( reflective ?\ght imply t ! univ]se is gr\nd$ 91 & is ! manife/ation (1 reason02 #efj--8,! exi/5ce ( a p]sonal ,god is a necess>y datum ( sci5tific k40 ,s also1 ,fi%]1 ,essays on ,sup]nat4 ,orig9 ( ,*ri/ianity1 #efd1 & 9 ,j\rn4 ,*ri/4 ,philos41 ,jan4 #ahhc3abi1 #acj4 ,c4 ,our primitive belief 9 f9al cause1 or1 9 o!r words1 our conviction t all ?+s h _! ends1 t design p]vades ! univ]se1 involves a belief 9 ,god's exi/5ce4 ,9 assum+ t !re is a univ]se1 t ! univ]se is a rational :ole1 a sy/em ( ?\ght-relations1 we assume ! exi/5ce ( an absolute ,?9k]1 ( ^: ?\ght ! univ]se is an expression4 ,pfleid]]1 ,philos4 ( ,religion1 #a3ha--8,! real c only be ?9kable if x is realiz$ ?\ght1 a ?\ght previ\sly ?\ght1 :i* our ?9k+ has only to ?9k aga94 ,!re=e ! real1 9 ord] to be ?9kable = u1 mu/ be ! realiz$ ?\ght ( ! creative ?9k+ ( an et]nal div9e ,reason :i* is pres5t$ to our cognitive ?9k+40 ,royce1 ,_w & ,individual1 #b3da--8,univ]sal teleology con/itutes ! ess5ce ( all facts40 ,a4 ,h4 ,brad=d1 ,! ,age ( ,fai?1 #adb--8,suff]+ & sorr[ are univ]sal4 ,ei!r ,god c\ld prev5t !m & w\ld n1 & !re=e he is nei!r b5efic5t nor lov+2 or else he _c prev5t !m & !re=e some?+ is great] ?an ,god1 & !re=e !re is no ,god8 ,b "h is ! use ( reason 9 ! individual reason+4 ,reason+ 9 ! individual necessitates ! absolute or univ]sal reason4 ,if !re is ! absolute reason1 !n ! univ]se & hi/ory are ord]$ & adm9i/]$ 9 h>mony ) reason2 !n suff]+ & sorr[ c be nei!r mean+less nor f9al1 s9ce t w\ld be ! contradiction ( reason4 ,t _c be possible 9 ! univ]sal & absolute :i* contradicts reason 9 man40 ,d4 ,our primitive belief 9 moral obligation1 or1 9 o!r words1 our conviction t "r has univ]sal au?ority1 involves ! belief 9 ,god's exi/5ce4 ,9 assum+ t ! univ]se is a moral :ole1 we assume ! exi/5ce ( an absolute ,w1 ( ^: righte\sness ! univ]se is an expression4 ,pfleid]]1 ,philos4 ( ,religion1 #a3hh--8,! gr\nd ( moral obligation is f\nd nei!r 9 ! subject nor 9 society1 b only 9 ! univ]sal or div9e ,w t comb9es bo?4444 #ajc--,! idea ( ,god is ! unity ( ! true & ! good1 or ( ! two highe/ ideas :i* our reason ?9ks z !oretical reason1 b dem&s z practical reason4444 ,9 ! idea ( ,god we f9d ! only syn!sis ( ! _w t is--! _w ( sci5ce1 & ( ! _w t ought to be--! _w ( religion40 ,se?1 ,e?ical ,pr9ciples1 #dbe--8,?is is n a ma!matical demon/ration4 ,philosophy nev] is an exact sci5ce4 ,r is x (f]$ z ! only suffici5t f\ndation ( ! moral life4444 ,! life ( goodness 444 is a life bas$ on ! conviction t its s\rce & its issues are 9 ! ,et]nal & ! ,inf9ite40 ,z f9ite tru? & goodness are compreh5sible only 9 ! light ( "s absolute pr9ciple :i* furni%es = !m an ideal /&>d1 s f9ite beauty is inexplicable except z !re exi/s a p]fect /&>d ) :i* x may be comp>$4 ,! beautiful is m ?an ! agreeable or ! useful4 ,proportion1 ord]1 h>mony1 unity 9 div]sity--all ^! are *>act]i/ics ( beauty4 ,b !y all imply an intellectual & spiritual ,be+1 f :om !y proce$ & by :om !y c be measur$4 ,bo? physical & moral beauty1 9 f9ite ?+s & be+s1 are symbols & manife/ations ( ,him :o is ! au?or & lov] ( beauty1 & :o is himself ! inf9ite & absolute ,beauty4 ,! beautiful 9 nature & 9 art %[s t ! idea ( ,god's exi/5ce is logically indep5d5t & prior4 ,see ,c\s91 ,! ,true1 ! ,beautiful1 & ! ,good1 #adj-aec2 ,kant1 ,metaphysic ( ,e?ics1 :o holds t belief 9 ,god is ! necess>y presupposition ( ! belief 9 duty4 ,to repeat ^! f\r po9ts 9 ano!r =m--! intuition ( an ,absolute ,reason is 7a7 ! necess>y presupposition ( all o!r k1 s t we _c "k any?+ else to exi/ except by assum+ fir/ ( all t ,god exi/s2 7b7 ! necess>y basis ( all logical ?\ght1 s t we _c put confid5ce 9 any "o ( our reason+ processes except by tak+ = grant$ t a ?9k+ ,deity has con/ruct$ our m9ds ) ref]5ce to ! univ]se & to tru?2 7c7 ! necess>y implication ( our primitive belief 9 design1 s t we c assume all ?+s to exi/ = a purpose1 only by mak+ ! prior assumption t a purpos+ ,god exi/s--c reg>d ! univ]se z a ?\ght1 only by po/ulat+ ! exi/5ce ( an absolute ,?9k]2 & 7d7 ! necess>y f\ndation ( our conviction ( moral obligation1 s t we c believe 9 ! univ]sal au?ority ( "r1 only by assum+ t !re exi/s a ,god ( righte\sness :o reveals 8 w bo? 9 ! individual consci5ce & 9 ! moral univ]se at l>ge4 ,we _c prove t ,god is2 b we c %[ t1 9 ord] to %[ ! exi/5ce ( any k1 ?\ght1 reason1 consci5ce1 9 man1 man mu/ assume t ,god is4 ,z ,jacobi said ( ! beautiful3 8,es kann gewies5 ab] ni*t bewies5 w]d50--x c be %[n1 b n prov$4 ,b[ne1 ,metaphysics1 #dgb--8,our objective k ( ! f9ite mu/ re/ ^u e?ical tru/ 9 ! inf9ite02 #dhj--8,!ism is ! absolute po/ulate ( all k1 sci5ce & philosophy02 8,god is ! mo/ c]ta9 fact ( objective k40 ,ladd1 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,oct4 #ahgg3faa-faf--8;,cogito1 ergo ,deus e/4 ,we are oblig$ to po/ulate a n-ourselves :i* makes = rationality1 z well z = righte\sness40 ,w4 ,t4 ,h>ris3 8,ev5 natural sci5ce is impossible1 :]e philosophy has n yet taught t reason made ! _w1 & t nature is a revelation ( ! rational40 ,:ately1 ,logic1 #bgj2 ,new ,engl&]1 ,oct4 #ahga1 art4 on ,gr\nds ( ,confid5ce 9 ,inductive ,reason+2 ,bib4 ,sac41 #g3dae-dbe2 ,dorn]1 ,glaub5slehre1 #a3aig2 ,tr5del5burg1 ,logis*e ,unt]su*ung51 *4 8,zweck02 ,ulrici1 ,gott und die ,natur1 #edj-fbf2 ,la*eli]1 ,du ,fondem5t de l',induction1 #gh4 ,p] contra1 see ,janet1 ,f9al ,causes1 #agd1 note1 & #deg-dfd1 :o holds f9al cause to be1 n an intuition1 b ! result ( apply+ ! pr9ciple ( causality to cases :i* me*anical laws alone w n expla94 ,pascal3 8,nature conf\nds ! ,pyrrhoni/1 & ,reason conf\nds ! ,dogmati/4 ,we h an incapacity ( demon/ration1 :i* ! =m] _c ov]come2 we h a conception ( tru? :i* ! latt] _c di/urb40 8,!re is no ,unbelief6 ,:oev] says4 #8,to-morr[1' #8,! ,unkn[n1' #8,! ,future1' tru/s t ,p[] alone4 ,nor d>es dis[n40 ,jones1 ,rob]t ,br[n+1 #cad--8,we _c inde$ prove ,god z ! conclusion ( a syllogism1 = he is ! prim>y hypo!sis ( all pro(40 ,rob]t ,br[n+1 ,hoh5/iel-,s*wangau3 8,i "k t he is !re1 z ,i am "h1 ,by ! same pro(1 :i* seems no pro( at all1 ,x s exce$s famili> =ms ( pro(02 ,p>acelsus1 #bg--8,to "k ,r consi/s 9 op5+ out a way ,:5ce ! imprison$ spl5dor may escape ,?an 9 effect+ entrance = a light ,suppos$ to be )\t40 ,t5nyson1 ,holy ,grail3 8,let visions ( ! night or day ,come z !y w1 & _m a "t !y come4444 ,9 mom5ts :5 he feels he _c die1 ,& kn[s himself no vision to himself1 ,nor ! high ,god a vision1 nor t ,"o ,:o rose aga902 ,! ,anci5t ,sage1 #edh--8,?\ can/ n prove ! ,nameless1 ,o my son6 ,nor can/ ?\ prove ! _w ?\ move/ 94 ,?\ can/ n prove t ?\ art body alone1 ,nor can/ ,?\ prove t ?\ art _s alone1 ,nor can/ ?\ prove t ?\ art bo? 9 "o4 ,?\ can/ n prove t ?\ art immortal1 no1 ,nor yet t ?\ art mortal4 ,nay1 my son1 ?\ can/ n prove t ,i1 :o speak ) !e1 ,am n ?yself 9 conv]se ) ?yself4 ,= no?+ wor?y prov+ c be prov51 ,nor yet disprov53 ,:]e=e be ?\ wise1 ,cleave ev] to ! sunni] side ( d\bt1 ,& cl+ to ,fai? beyond ! =ms ( ,fai?40 ,,iii4 ,o!r ,suppos$ ,s\rces ( our ,idea ( ,god's ,exi/5ce4 ,our pro( t ! idea ( ,god's exi/5ce is a rational intuition w n be complete1 until we %[ t attempts to acc\nt 9 o!r ways = ! orig9 ( ! idea are insuffici5t1 & require z _! presupposition ! v intuition :i* !y w\ld supplant or r$uce to a second>y place4 ,we claim t x _c be d]iv$ f any o!r s\rce ?an an orig9al cognitive p[] ( ! m9d4 #a4 ,n f ext]nal revelation1--:e!r communicat$ 7a7 ?r\gh ! ,scriptures1 or 7b7?r\gh tradition2 =1 unless man _h f ano!r s\rce a previ\s k ( ! exi/5ce ( a ,god f :om su* a revelation might come1 ! revelation itself c\ld h no au?ority = him4 7a7 ,see ,gillespie1 ,necess>y ,exi/5ce ( ,god1 #aj2 ,ebr>d1 ,dogmatik1 #a3aag2 ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 ,fai? & ,philosophy1 #ah--8;,a revelation takes = grant$ t he to :om x is made has "s k ( ,god1 ?\gh x may enl>ge & purify t k40 ,we _c prove ,god f ! au?ority ( ! ,scriptures1 & !n also prove ! ,scriptures f ! au?ority ( ,god4 ,! v idea ( ,scripture z a revelation presupposes belief 9 a ,god :o c make x4 ,newman ,smy?1 9 ,new ,engl&]1 #ahgh3cee--,we _c d]ive f a sun-dial our k ( ! exi/5ce ( a sun4 ,! sun-dial presupposes ! sun1 & _c be und]/ood )\t previ\s k ( ! sun4 ,wuttke1 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics1 #b3ajc--8,! voice ( ! div9e ego does n fir/ come to ! consci\sness ( ! individual ego f )\t2 r does e ext]nal revelation presuppose already ?is inn] "o2 !re mu/ e*o out f )9 man some?+ k9dr$ to ! out] revelation1 9 ord] to its be+ recogniz$ & accept$ z div9e40 ,fairbairn1 ,/udies 9 ,philos4 ( ,relig4 & ,hi/41 #ba1 #bb--8;,if man is dep5d5t on an out] revelation = 8 idea ( ,god1 !n he mu/ h :at ,s*ell+ happily t]m$ #8an orig9al a!ism ( consci\sness4' ,religion _c1 9 t case1 be root$ 9 ! nature ( man1--x mu/ be implant$ f )\t40 ,s*urman1 ,belief 9 ,god1 #gh--8;,a primitive revelation ( ,god c\ld only mean t ,god _h end[$ man ) ! capacity ( appreh5d+ 8 div9e orig9al4 ,?is capacity1 l e o!r1 is innate1 & l e o!r1 x realizes itself only 9 ! pres5ce ( appropriate conditions40 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #aab--8,revelation _c demon/rate ,god's exi/5ce1 = x mu/ assume x2 b x w manife/ 8 exi/5ce & "* to m51 & w s]ve !m z ! *ief s\rce ( c]ta9ty conc]n+ him1 = x w tea* !m :at !y c\ld n "k by o!r means40 7b7 ,nor does our idea ( ,god come prim>ily f tradition1 = 8tradition c p]petuate only :at has already be5 orig9at$0 7,patton74 ,if ! k ?us h&$ d[n is ! k ( a primitive revelation1 !n ! argum5t j /at$ applies--t v revelation presuppos$ 9 ^? :o fir/ receiv$ x1 & presupposes 9 ^? to :om x is h&$ d[n1 "s k ( a ,be+ f :om su* a revelation might come4 ,if ! k ?us h&$ d[n is simply k ( ! results ( ! reason+s ( ! race1 !n ! k ( ,god comes orig9ally f reason+--an explanation :i* we consid] fur!r on4 ,on ! traditive !ory ( religion1 see ,fl9t1 ,!ism1 #bc1 #cch2 ,cock]1 ,*ri/ianity & ,greek ,philosophy1 #hf-if2 ,fairbairn1 ,/udies 9 ,philos4 ( ,relig4 & ,hi/41 #ad1 #ae2 ,b[51 ,metaph4 & ,e?ics1 #dec1 & 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,oct4 #ahgf2 ,pfleid]]1 ,religionsphilos41 #cab-cbb4 ,simil> answ]s mu/ be return$ to _m common explanations ( man's belief 9 ,god3 8,primus 9 orbe deos fecit timor02 ,imag9ation made religion2 ,prie/s inv5t$ religion2 ,religion is a matt] ( imitation & fa%ion4 ,b we ask aga93 ,:at caus$ ! fe>8 ,:o made ! imag9ation8 ,:at made prie/s possible8 ,:at made imitation & fa%ion natural8 ,to say t man wor%ips1 m]ely because he sees o!r m5 wor%ip+1 is z absurd z to say t a horse eats hay because he sees o!r horses eat+ x4 ,!re mu/ be a hung] 9 ! s\l to be satisfi$1 or ext]nal ?+s w\ld nev] attract man to wor%ip4 ,prie/s c\ld nev] impose ^u m5 s cont9u\sly1 unless !re 0 9 human nature a univ]sal belief 9 a ,god :o might commission prie/s z 8 repres5tatives4 ,imag9ation itself requires "s basis ( reality1 & a l>g] basis z civilization advances4 ,! fact t belief 9 ,god's exi/5ce gets a wid] hold ^u ! race ) ea* add$ c5tury1 %[s t1 in/ead ( fe> hav+ caus$ belief 9 ,god1 ! tru? is t belief 9 ,god has caus$ fe>2 inde$1 8! fe> ( ,jehovah is ! beg9n+ ( wisdom0 7,ps4 #aaa3aj74 #b4 ,n f exp]i5ce1--:e!r ?is mean 7a7 ! s5se-p]ception & reflection ( ! individual 7,locke71 7b7 ! accumulat$ results ( ! s5sations & associations ( pa/ g5]ations ( ! race 7,h]b]t ,sp5c]71 or 7c7 ! actual contact ( our s5sitive nature ) ,god1 ! sup]s5sible reality1 ?r\gh ! religi\s feel+ 7,newman ,smy?74 ,! fir/ =m ( ?is !ory is inconsi/5t ) ! fact t ! idea ( ,god is n ! idea ( a s5sible or mat]ial object1 nor a comb9ation ( su* ideas4 ,s9ce ! spiritual & inf9ite are direct opposites ( ! mat]ial & f9ite1 no exp]i5ce ( ! latt] c acc\nt = our idea ( ! =m]4 ,) ,locke 7,essay on ,hum4 ,und]/&+1 #b3a3d71 exp]i5ce is ! passive reception ( ideas by s5sation or by reflection4 ,locke's 8tabula rasa0 !ory mi/akes ! occasion ( our primitive ideas = _! cause4 ,to 8 /atem5t3 8,nihil e/ 9 intellectu nisi quod ante fu]it 9 s5su10 ,leibnitz repli$3 8,nisi intellectus ipse40 ,consci\sness is sometimes call$ ! s\rce ( our k ( ,god4 ,b consci\sness1 z simply an accompany+ k ( ourselves & our /ates1 is n prop]ly ! s\rce ( any o!r k4 ,! ,g]man ,gottesbewus/se9 n 8consci\sness ( ,god10 b 8k ( ,god02 ,bewus/se9 "h n a 8conkn[+10 b a 8bekn[+02 see ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #hf2 ,c\s91 ,true1 ,beautiful & ,good1 #dh1 #di4 ,fras]1 ,locke1 #adc-adg--,s5sations are ! bricks1 & association ! mort>1 ( ! m5tal h\se4 ,b[ne1 ,!ory ( ,?\ght & ,k1 #dg--8;,develope language by all[+ s\nds to associate & evolve mean+ = !mselves8 ,yet ?is is ! exact p>allel ( ! philosophy :i* aims to build intellig5ce out ( s5sation4444#eb--,"o :o does n "k h[ to read w\ld look 9 va9 = mean+ 9 a pr9t$ page1 & 9 va9 w\ld he seek to help 8 failure by us+ /rong spectacles40 ,yet ev5 if ! idea ( ,god 7 a product ( exp]i5ce1 we %\ld n be w>rant$ 9 reject+ x z irrational4 ,see ,brooks1 ,f\ndations ( ,zology1 #acb--8,!re is no antagonism betwe5 ^? :o attribute k to exp]i5ce & ^? :o attribute x to our innate reason2 betwe5 ^? :o attribute ! developm5t ( ! g]m to me*anical conditions & ^? :o attribute x to ! inh]5t pot5cy ( ! g]m itself2 betwe5 ^? :o hold t all nature 0 lat5t 9 ! cosmic vapor & ^? :o believe t ev]y?+ 9 nature is imm$iately int5d$ r ?an pr$et]m9$40 ,all ^! may be me?ods ( ! imman5t ,god4 ,! second =m ( ! !ory is op5 to ! objection t ! v fir/ exp]i5ce ( ! fir/ man1 equally ) man's late/ exp]i5ce1 presupposes ?is intuition1 z well z ! o!r intuitions1 & !re=e _c be ! cause ( x4 ,moreov]1 ev5 ?\gh ?is !ory ( its orig9 7 correct1 x w\ld /ill be impossible to ?9k ( ! object ( ! intuition z n exi/+1 & ! intuition w\ld /ill repres5t to u ! highe/ measure ( c]titude at pres5t atta9able by man4 ,if ! evolution ( ideas is t[>d tru? in/ead ( falsehood1 x is ! "p ( wisdom to act ^u ! hypo!sis t our primitive belief is v]aci\s4 ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy1 #b3bf--8,nature is z wor?y ( tru/ 9 h] processes1 z 9 h] gifts40 ,b[ne1 ,exam9ation ( ,sp5c]1 #afc1 #afd--8;,are we to seek tru? 9 ! m9ds ( pre-human apes1 or 9 ! bl9d /irr+s ( "s primitive pulp8 ,9 t case we c inde$ put away all our sci5ce1 b we mu/ put away ! great doctr9e ( evolution along ) x4 ,! exp]i5ce-philosophy _c escape ?is alt]native3 ei!r ! positive deliv]ances ( our mature consci\sness mu/ be accept$ z !y /&1 or all tru? mu/ be decl>$ impossible40 ,see also ,h>ris1 ,philos4 ,basis ,!ism1 #acg-adb4 ,*>les ,d>w91 9 a lett] writt5 a ye> be=e 8 dea?1 ref]r+ to 8 d\bts z to ! exi/5ce ( ,god1 asks3 8,c we tru/ to ! convictions ( a monkey's m9d80 ,we may reply3 8,c we tru/ ! conclusions ( "o :o 0 once a baby80 ,b[ne1 ,e?ics1 #c--8,! g5esis & em]g5ce ( an idea are "o ?+2 its validity is q ano!r4 ,! logical value ( *emi/ry _c be decid$ by recit+ its beg9n+s 9 al*emy2 & ! logical value ( a/ronomy is indep5d5t ( ! fact t x began 9 a/rology4444 #aa--;,ev5 if man came f ! ape1 we ne$ n tremble = ! validity ( ! multiplication-table or ( ! ,gold5 ,rule4 ,if we h moral insight1 x is no matt] h[ we got x2 & if we h no su* insight1 !re is no help 9 any psy*ological !ory4444 #aei--,we mu/ n appeal to savages & babies to f9d :at is natural to ! human m9d4444 ,9 ! case ( any?+ t is "u ! law ( developm5t we c f9d its true nature1 n by go+ back to its crude beg9n+s1 b by /udy+ ! f9i%$ outcome40 ,dawson1 ,mod4 ,ideas ( ,evolution1 #ac--8;,if ! idea ( ,god be ! phantom ( an apelike bra91 c we tru/ to reason or consci5ce 9 any o!r matt]8 ,may n sci5ce & philosophy !mselves be simil> phantasies1 evolv$ by m]e *ance & unreason80 ,ev5 ?\gh man came f ! ape1 !re is no expla9+ 8 ideas by ! ideas ( ! ape3 8,a man 's a man = a' t40 ,we mu/ judge beg9n+s by end+s1 n end+s by beg9n+s4 ,x matt]s n h[ ! developm5t ( ! eye took place nor h[ imp]fect 0 ! fir/ s5se ( sight1 if ! eye n[ gives u correct in=mation ( ext]nal objects4 ,s x matt]s n h[ ! intuitions ( "r & ( ,god orig9at$1 if !y n[ give u k ( objective tru?4 ,we mu/ take = grant$ t evolution ( ideas is n f s5se to nons5se4 ,g4 ,h4 ,lewes1 ,/udy ( ,psy*ology1 #abb--8,we c und]/& ! amba & ! polyp only by a light reflect$ f ! /udy ( man40 ,se?1 ,e?ical ,pr9ciples1 #dbi--8,! oak expla9s ! acorn ev5 m truly ?an ! acorn expla9s ! oak40 ,sidgwick3 8,no "o appeals f ! arti/'s s5se ( beauty to ! *ild's4 ,high] ma!matics are no less true1 because !y c be appreh5d$ only by tra9$ intellect4 ,no /range importance atta*es to :at 0 fir/ felt or ?\ght40 ,rob]t ,br[n+1 ,p>acelsus3 8,man1 once descri$1 impr9ts =ev] ,8 pres5ce on all lifeless ?+s4444 ,a supplem5t>y reflux ( light ,illu/rates all ! inf]ior grades1 expla9s ,ea* back /ep 9 ! circle40 ,man1 ) 8 high] ideas1 %[s ! mean+ & cont5t ( all t l$ up to him4 ,he is ! la/ r\nd ( ! asc5d+ ladd]1 & f ?is highe/ product & f 8 ideas we may inf] :at 8 ,mak] is4 ,bixby1 ,crisis 9 ,morals1 #afb1 #bde--8;,evolution simply gave man su* height t he c\ld at la/ disc]n ! />s ( moral tru? :i* _h previ\sly be5 bel[ ! horizon4 ,?is is v diff]5t f say+ t moral tru?s are m]ely transmitt$ products ( ! exp]i5ces ( utility4444 ,! g]m ( ! idea ( ,god1 z ( ! idea ( "r1 mu/ h be5 9 man j s soon z he became man1--! brute's ga9+ x turn$ him into man4 ,reason is n simply a regi/] ( physical ph5om5a & ( exp]i5ces ( pleasure & pa93 x is creative also4 ,x disc]ns ! on5ess ( ?+s & ! supremacy ( ,god40 ,sir ,*>les ,lyell3 8,! presumption is enorm\s t all our faculties1 ?\gh liable to err1 are true 9 ! ma9 & po9t to real objects4 ,! religi\s faculty 9 man is "o ( ! /ronge/ ( all4 ,x exi/$ 9 ! e>lie/ ages1 & in/ead ( we>+ out be=e advanc+ civilization1 x gr[s /rong] & /rong]1 & is to-day m develop$ among ! highe/ races ?an x ev] 0 be=e4 ,i ?9k we may safely tru/ t x po9ts to a great tru?40 ,fi%]1 ,nat4 & ,me?4 ( ,rev41 #acg1 quotes ,augu/9e3 8,securus judicat orbis t]r>um10 & tells u t ! intellect is assum$ to be an organ ( k1 h[ev] ! intellect may h be5 evolv$4 ,b if ! intellect is wor?y ( tru/1 s is ! moral nature4 ,george ,a4 ,gordon1 ,! ,*ri/ ( ,to-day1 #ajc--8,to ,h]b]t ,sp5c]1 human hi/ory is b an incid5t ( natural hi/ory1 & =ce is supreme4 ,to ,*ri/ianity nature is only ! beg9n+1 & man ! consummation4 ,:i* gives ! high] revelation ( ! life ( ! tree--! se$1 or ! fruit80 ,! ?ird =m ( ! !ory seems to make ,god a s5su\s object1 to rev]se ! prop] ord] ( kn[+ & feel+1 to ignore ! fact t 9 all feel+ !re is at lea/ "s k ( an object1 & to =get t ! validity ( ?is v feel+ c be ma9ta9$ only by previ\sly assum+ ! exi/5ce ( a rational ,deity4 ,newman ,smy? tells u t feel+ comes fir/2 ! idea is second>y4 ,intuitive ideas are n d5i$1 b !y are decl>$ to be direct reflections1 9 ?\ght1 ( ! feel+s4 ,!y are ! m9d's imm$iate p]ception ( :at x feels to exi/4 ,direct k ( ,god by intuition is consid]$ to be ideali/ic1 rea*+ ,god by inf]5ce is reg>d$ z rationali/ic1 9 its t5d5cy4 ,see ,smy?1 ,! ,religi\s ,feel+2 review$ by ,h>ris1 9 ,new ,engl&]1 ,jan41 #ahgh3 reply by ,smy?1 9 ,new ,engl&]1 ,may1 #ahgh4 ,we grant t1 ev5 9 ! case ( unreg5]ate m51 great p]il1 great joy1 great s9 (t5 turn ! rational intuition ( ,god into a pres5tative intuition4 ,! pres5tative intuition1 h[ev]1 _c be affirm$ to be common to all m54 ,x does n furni% ! f\ndation or explanation ( a univ]sal capacity = religion4 ,)\t ! rational intuition1 ! pres5tative w\ld n be possible1 s9ce x is only ! rational t enables man to receive & to int]pret ! pres5tative4 ,! v tru/ t we put 9 feel+ presupposes an intuitive belief 9 a true & good ,god4 ,t5nyson said 9 #ahfi3 8,yes1 x is true t !re are mom5ts :5 ! fle% is no?+ to me2 :5 ,i "k & feel ! fle% to be ! vision2 ,god & ! spiritual is ! real2 x belongs to me m ?an ! h& & ! foot4 ,y may tell me t my h& & my foot are only imag9>y symbols ( my exi/5ce1--,i c\ld believe y2 b y nev]1 nev] c conv9ce me t ! ,i is n an et]nal ,reality1 & t ! spiritual is n ! real & true "p ( me40 #c4 ,n f reason+1--because 7a7 ,! actual rise ( ?is k 9 ! great majority ( m9ds is n ! result ( any consci\s process ( reason+4 ,on ! o!r h&1 ^u occurr5ce ( ! prop] conditions1 x fla%es ^u ! s\l ) ! quickness & =ce ( an imm$iate revelation4 7b7 ,! /r5g? ( m5's fai? 9 ,god's exi/5ce is n proportion$ to ! /r5g? ( ! reason+ faculty4 ,on ! o!r h&1 m5 ( greate/ logical p[] are (t5 invet]ate sceptics1 :ile m5 ( unwav]+ fai? are f\nd among ^? :o _c ev5 und]/& ! argum5ts = ,god's exi/5ce4 7c7 ,!re is m 9 ?is k ?an reason+ c\ld ev] h furni%$4 ,m5 d n limit _! belief 9 ,god to ! j conclusions ( argum5t4 ,! argum5ts = ! div9e exi/5ce1 valuable z !y are = purposes to be %[n h]eaft]1 are n suffici5t by !mselves to w>rant our conviction t !re exi/s an inf9ite & absolute ,be+4 ,x w appe> ^u exam9ation t ! a priori argum5t is capable ( prov+ only an ab/ract & ideal proposition1 b c nev] conduct u to ! exi/5ce ( a real ,be+4 ,x w appe> t ! a po/]iori argum5ts1 f m]ely f9ite exi/5ce1 c nev] demon/rate ! exi/5ce ( ! inf9ite4 ,9 ! words ( ,sir ,wm4 ,hamilton 7,discussions1 #bc7--8;,a demon/ration ( ! absolute f ! relative is logically absurd1 z 9 su* a syllogism we mu/ collect 9 ! conclusion :at is n di/ribut$ 9 ! premises0--9 %ort1 f f9ite premises we _c draw an inf9ite conclusion4 ,:ately1 ,logic1 #bij-bib2 ,jevons1 ,lessons 9 ,logic1 #ha2 ,?ompson1 ,outl9e ,laws ( ,?\ght1 sections #hb-ib2 ,cald]wood1 ,philos4 ( ,inf9ite1 #fj-fi1 & ,moral ,philosophy1 #bch2 ,turnbull1 9 ,bap4 ,qu>t]ly1 ,july1 #ahgb3bga2 ,van ,oo/]zee1 ,dogmatics1 #bci2 ,dove1 ,logic ( ,*ri/ian ,fai?1 #ba4 ,sir ,wm4 ,hamilton3 8,dep>t+ f ! p>ticul>1 we admit t we _c1 9 our highe/ g5]alizations1 rise above ! f9ite40 ,dr4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,! human m9d turns out l>g] gri/s ?an are ev] put 9 at ! hopp]40 ,!re is m 9 ! idea ( ,god ?an c\ld h come out s small a knot-hole z human reason+4 ,a s+le ^w1 a *ance rem>k1 or an attitude ( pray]1 sugge/s ! idea to a *ild4 ,hel5 ,kell] told ,phillips ,brooks t %e _h always kn[n t !re 0 a ,god1 b t %e _h n kn[n 8 "n4 ,ladd1 ,philosophy ( ,m9d1 #aai--8;,x is a fooli% assumption t no?+ c be c]ta9ly kn[n unless x be rea*$ z ! result ( a consci\s syllogi/ic process1 or t ! m complicat$ & subtle ?is process is1 ! m sure is ! conclusion4 ,inf]5tial k is always dep5d5t ^u ! sup]ior c]ta9ty ( imm$iate k40 ,george ,m4 ,duncan1 9 ,memorial ( ,noah ,port]1 #bdf--8;,all d$uction re/s ei!r on ! previ\s process ( induction1 or on ! intuitions ( "t & space :i* involve ! ,inf9ite & ,absolute40 7d7 ,nei!r d m5 arrive at ! k ( ,god's exi/5ce by inf]5ce2 = inf]5ce is cond5s$ syllogism1 &1 z a =m ( reason+1 is equally op5 to ! objection j m5tion$4 ,we h se51 moreov]1 t all logical processes are bas$ ^u ! assumption ( ,god's exi/5ce4 ,evid5tly t :i* is presuppos$ 9 all reason+ _c itself be prov$ by reason+4 ,by inf]5ce1 we ( c\rse mean m$iate inf]5ce1 = 9 imm$iate inf]5ce 7e4 g41 8,all good rul]s are j2 !re=e no unju/ rul]s are good07 !re is no reason+1 & no progress 9 ?\ght4 ,m$iate inf]5ce is reason+--is cond5s$ syllogism2 & :at is s cond5s$ may be exp&$ into regul> logical =m4 ,d$uctive inf]5ce3 8,a negro is a fell[-creature2 !re=e he :o /rikes a negro /rikes a fell[-creature40 ,inductive inf]5ce3 8,! fir/ f+] is be=e ! second2 !re=e x is be=e ! ?ird40 ,on inf]5ce1 see ,m>t9eau1 ,essays1 #a3aje-ajh2 ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #ddd-ddh2 ,jevons1 ,pr9ciples ( ,sci5ce1 #a3ad1 #acf-aci1 #afh1 #bfb4 ,fl9t1 9 8 ,!ism1 #gg1 & ,h]b]t1 9 8 ,mod4 ,realism ,exam9$1 w\ld rea* ! k ( ,god's exi/5ce by inf]5ce4 ,! latt] says ,god is n demon/rable1 b 8 exi/5ce is inf]r$1 l ! exi/5ce ( our fell[ m54 ,b we reply t 9 ?is la/ case we inf] only ! f9ite f ! f9ite1 :ile ! difficulty 9 ! case ( ,god is 9 inf]r+ ! inf9ite f ! f9ite4 ,?is v process ( reason+1 moreov]1 presupposes ! exi/5ce ( ,god z ! absolute ,reason1 9 ! way already indicat$4 ,sub/antially ! same error is committ$ by ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 ,introd4 to ,*r4 ,!ol41 #hd-acc1 & by ,diman1 ,!i/ic ,argum5t1 #caf1 #cfd1 bo? ( :om grant an intuitive elem5t1 b use x only to eke out ! insuffici5cy ( reason+4 ,!y consid] t ! intuition gives u only an ab/ract idea1 :i* conta9s 9 itself no v\*] = ! exi/5ce ( an actual be+ correspond+ to ! idea1 & t we rea* real be+ only by inf]5ce f ! facts ( our own spiritual natures & ( ! outw>d _w4 ,b we reply1 9 ! words ( ,mc,cosh1 t 8! intuitions are prim>ily direct$ to individual objects40 ,we "k1 n ! inf9ite 9 ! ab/ract1 b inf9ite space & "t1 & ! inf9ite ,god4 ,see ,mc,cosh1 ,intuitions1 #bf1 #aii1 :o1 h[ev]1 holds ! view "h combat$4 ,s*urman1 ,belief 9 ,god1 #dc--8;,i am unable to assign to our belief 9 ,god a high] c]ta9ty ?an t possess$ by ! work+ hypo!ses ( sci5ce4444 #eg--,! ne>e/ approa* made by sci5ce to our hypo!sis ( ! exi/5ce ( ,god lies 9 ! ass]tion ( ! univ]sality ( law 444 bas$ on ! conviction ( ! unity & sy/ematic connection ( all reality4444 #fd--,?is unity c be f\nd only 9 self-consci\s _s40 ,! fault ( ?is reason+ is t x gives u no?+ necess>y or absolute4 ,in/ances ( work+ hypo!ses are ! nebul> hypo!sis 9 a/ronomy1 ! law ( gravitation1 ! atomic !ory 9 *emi/ry1 ! pr9ciple ( evolution4 ,no "o ( ^! is logically indep5d5t or prior4 ,ea* ( !m is provisional1 & ea* may be sup]s$$ by new discov]y4 ,n s ) ! idea ( ,god4 ,?is idea is presuppos$ by all ! o!rs1 z ! condition ( e m5tal process & ! gu>antee ( its validity4 ,,iv4 ,cont5ts ( ?is ,intuition4 #a4 ,9 ?is fundam5tal k t ,god is1 x is necess>ily impli$ t to "s ext5t m5 "k intuitively :at ,god is1 namely1 7a7 a ,reason 9 :i* _! m5tal processes are gr\nd$2 7b7 a ,p[] above !m ^u :i* !y are dep5d5t2 7c7 a ,p]fection :i* imposes law ^u _! moral natures2 7d7 a ,p]sonality :i* !y may recognize 9 pray] & wor%ip4 ,9 ma9ta9+ t we h a rational intuition ( ,god1 we by no means imply t a pres5tative intuition ( ,god is impossible4 ,su* a pres5tative intuition 0 p]haps *>act]i/ic ( unfall5 man2 x does belong at times to ! ,*ri/ian2 x w be ! bless+ ( heav5 7,mat4 #e3h--8! pure 9 he>t 444 %all see ,god02 ,rev4 #bb3d--8!y %all see 8 face074 ,m5's exp]i5ces ( face-to-face appreh5sion ( ,god1 9 dang] & guilt1 give "s reason to believe t a pres5tative k ( ,god is ! normal condition ( humanity4 ,b1 z ?is pres5tative intuition ( ,god is n 9 our pres5t /ate univ]sal1 we "h claim only t all m5 h a rational intuition ( ,god4 ,x is to be rememb]$1 h[ev]1 t ! loss ( love to ,god has greatly obscur$ ev5 ?is rational intuition1 s t ! revelation ( nature & ! ,scriptures is ne$$ to awak51 confirm & enl>ge x1 & ! special "w ( ! ,_s ( ,*ri/ to make x ! k ( fri5d%ip & communion4 ,?us f kn[+ ab\t ,god1 we come to "k ,god 7,john #ag3c--8,?is is life et]nal1 t !y %\ld "k !e02 #b ,tim4 #a3ab--8;,i "k him :om ,i h believ$074 ,plato said1 = sub/ance1 t !re c be no )\t some?+ ( ! 4 ,h>ris1 ,philosophical ,basis ( ,!ism1 #bjh--8;,by rational intuition man kn[s t absolute ,be+ exi/s2 8 k ( :at x is1 is progressive ) 8 progressive k ( man & ( nature40 ,hutton1 ,essays3 8,a haunt+ pres5ce besets man beh9d & be=e4 ,he _c evade x4 ,x gives new mean+s to 8 ?\ghts1 new t]ror to 8 s9s4 ,x becomes intol]able4 ,he is mov$ to set up "s idol1 c>v$ out ( 8 own nature1 t w take its place--a non-moral ,god :o w n di/urb 8 dream ( re/4 ,x is a righte\s ,life & ,w1 & n ! m]e idea ( righte\sness t /irs m5 s40 ,port]1 ,hum4 ,int41 #ffa--8,! ,absolute is a ?9k+ ,ag5t40 ,! intuition does n gr[ 9 c]ta9ty2 :at gr[s is ! m9d's quickness 9 apply+ x & p[] ( express+ x4 ,! intuition is n complex2 :at is complex is ! ,be+ intuitively cogniz$4 ,see ,cald]wood1 ,moral ,philosophy1 #bcb2 ,l[ndes1 ,philos4 ( ,prim>y ,beliefs1 #ajh-aab2 ,lu?>dt1 ,fund4 ,tru?s1 #aeg--,lat5t faculty ( spee* is call$ =? by spee* ( o!rs2 ! *ok$-up well fl[s aga9 :5 debris is cle>$ away4 ,b[51 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #cc3gdj-ged2 ,b[ne1 ,!ism1 #gi4 ,k ( a p]son is turn$ into p]sonal k by actual communication or revelation4 ,fir/1 comes ! intuitive k ( ,god possess$ by all m5--! assumption t !re exi/s a ,reason1 ,p[]1 ,p]fection1 ,p]sonality1 t makes correct ?9k+ & act+ possible4 ,secondly1 comes ! k ( ,god's be+ & attributes :i* nature & ,scripture furni%4 ,?irdly1 comes ! p]sonal & pres5tative k d]iv$ f actual reconciliation & int]c\rse ) ,god1 ?r\gh ,*ri/ & ! ,holy ,_s4 ,/e>ns1 ,evid5ce ( ,*ri/ian ,exp]i5ce1 #bjh--8;,*ri/ian exp]i5ce v]ifies ! claims ( doctr9e by exp]im5t1--s trans=m+ probable k into real k40 ,bi$]mann1 quot$ by ,pfleid]]1 ,grundriss1 #ah--8;,god reveals himself to ! human _s1 #a4 z its inf9ite ,gr\nd1 9 ! reason2 #b4 z its inf9ite ,norm1 9 ! consci5ce2 #c4 z its inf9ite ,/r5g?1 9 elevation to religi\s tru?1 bless$ness1 & fre$om40 ,%all ,i object to ?is ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce1 because only comp>atively few h x1 & ,i am n among ! numb]8 ,because ,i h n se5 ! moons ( ,jupit]1 %all ,i d\bt ! te/imony ( ! a/ronom] to _! exi/5ce8 ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce1 l ! sight ( ! moons ( ,jupit]1 is atta9able by all4 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #aac--8,"o :o w h full pro( ( ! good ,god's reality mu/ put x to ! exp]im5tal te/4 ,he mu/ take ! good ,god = real1 & receive ! confirmation t w foll[4 ,:5 fai? rea*es out aft] ,god1 x f9ds him4444 ,!y :o h f\nd him w be ! sane/ & true/ ( _! k9d1 & _! convictions w be among ! safe/ convictions ( man4444 ,^? :o live 9 fell[%ip ) ! good ,god w gr[ 9 goodness1 & w give practical evid5ce ( 8 exi/5ce aside f _! oral te/imony40 #b4 ,! ,scriptures1 !re=e1 d n attempt to prove ! exi/5ce ( ,god1 b1 on ! o!r h&1 bo? assume & decl>e t ! k t ,god is1 is univ]sal 7,rom4 #a3ai-ba1 #bh1 #cb2 #b3ae74 ,god has inlaid ! evid5ce ( ?is fundam5tal tru? 9 ! v nature ( man1 s t n[h]e is he )\t a witness4 ,! prea*] may confid5tly foll[ ! example ( ,scripture by assum+ x4 ,b he mu/ also explicitly decl>e x1 z ! ,scripture does4 8,= ! invisible ?+s ( him s9ce ! creation ( ! _w are cle>ly se50 7--spiritually view$72 ! organ giv5 = ?is purpose is ! 772 b !n--& ?is =ms ! transition to our next division ( ! subject--!y are 8p]ceiv$ ?r\gh ! ?+s t are made0 7 1 ,rom4 #a3bj74 ,on ,rom4 #a3ai-ba1 see ,weiss1 ,bib4 ,!ol4 des ,n4 ,t41 #bea1 note2 also comm5t>ies ( ,mey]1 ,al=d1 ,?oluck1 & ,wordswor?2 n 8t :i* may be kn[n0 7,rev4 ,v]s47 b 8t :i* is kn[n0 ( ,god2 are cle>ly se5 9 t !y are p]ceiv$ by ! reason-- expresses ! mann] ( ! 7,mey]72 comp>e ,john #a3i2 ,acts #ag3bg2 ,rom4 #a3bh2 #b3ae4 ,on #a ,cor4 #ae3cd1 see ,cald]wood1 ,philos4 ( ,inf41 #dff-- d n possess ! specially exalt$ k ( ,god :i* belongs to believ]s 9 ,*ri/ 7cf4 #a ,jo4 #d3g--8;e "o t love? is begott5 ( ,god1 & kn[e? ,god074 ,on ,eph4 #b3ab1 see ,pope1 ,!ology1 #a3bdj-- is oppos$ to be+ 9 ,*ri/1 & signifies r =sak5 ( ,god1 ?an d5y+ him or entirely ignorant ( him4 ,on ,scripture passages1 see ,s*mid1 ,bib4 ,!ol4 des ,n4 ,t41 #dhf2 ,h(mann1 ,s*riftbeweis1 #a3fb4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,! fir/ /atem5t ( ! ,bible is1 n t !re is a ,god1 b t #8,9 ! beg9n+ ,god creat$ ! heav5s & ! e>?' 7,g54 #a3a74 ,! belief 9 ,god nev] 0 & nev] c be ! result ( logical argum5t1 else ! ,bible w\ld give u pro(s40 ,_m texts reli$ ^u z pro(s ( ,god's exi/5ce are simply explications ( ! idea ( ,god1 z = example3 ,ps4 #id3i1 #aj--8;,he t plant$ ! e>1 %all he n he>8 ,he t =m$ ! eye1 %all he n see8 ,he t *a/ise? ! nations1 %all n he correct1 ev5 he t tea*e? man k80 ,plato says t ,god holds ! s\l by its roots1--he !re=e does n ne$ to demon/rate to ! s\l ! fact ( 8 exi/5ce4 ,m>t9eau1 ,seat ( ,au?ority1 #cjh1 says well t ,scripture & prea*+ only int]pret :at is already 9 ! he>t :i* x addresses3 8,fl++ a w>m brea? on ! inw>d oracles hid 9 invisible ink1 x r5d]s !m articulate & dazzl+ z ! h&writ+ on ! wall4 ,! div9e ,se] does n convey to y 8 revelation1 b qualifies y to receive y\r own4 ,?is mutual relation is possible only ?r\gh ! common pres5ce ( ,god 9 ! consci5ce ( mank9d40 ,%$d1 ,dogmatic ,!ology1 #a3aie-bbj--8,! e>? & sky make ! same s5sible impressions on ! organs ( a brute t !y d ^u ^? ( a man2 b ! brute nev] disc]ns ! #8invisible ?+s' ( ,god1 8 #8et]nal p[] & godhood' 7,rom4 #a3bj740 ,our subconsci\s activity1 s f> z x is normal1 is "u ! guidance ( ! imman5t ,reason4 ,s5sation1 be=e x results 9 ?\ght1 has 9 x logical elem5ts :i* are furni%$ by m9d--n ours1 b t ( ! ,inf9ite ,"o4 ,*ri/1 ! ,reveal] ( ,god1 reveals ,god 9 e man's m5tal life1 & ! ,holy ,_s may be ! pr9ciple ( self-consci\sness 9 man z 9 ,god4 ,h>ris1 ,god ! ,creator1 tells u t 8man f9ds ! ,reason t is et]nal & univ]sal reveal+ itself 9 ! ex]cise ( 8 own reason40 ,savage1 ,life aft] ,dea?1 #bfh--8;,h[ d y "k t y\r sublim9al consci\sness does n tap ,omnisci5ce1 & get at ! facts ( ! univ]se80 ,savage negatives ?is sugge/ion1 h[ev]1 & wrongly favors ! _s-!ory4 ,= 8 own exp]i5ce1 see pages #bie-cbi ( 8 book4 ,c4 ,m4 ,b>r[s1 9 ,proce$+s ( ,soc4 = ,psy*ical ,rese>*1 vol4 #ab1 "p #cj1 pages #cd-cf--8,!re is a sublim9al ag5t4 ,:at if ?is is simply "o intellig5t ,actor1 fill+ ! univ]se ) 8 pres5ce1 z ! e!r fills space2 ! common ,inspir] ( all mank9d1 a skill$ ,musician1 presid+ ov] _m pipes & keys1 & play+ ?r\gh ea* :at music he w8 ,! sublim9al self is a univ]sal f\nta9 ( en]gy1 & ea* man is an outlet ( ! /ream4 ,ea* man's p]sonal self is conta9$ 9 x1 & ?us ea* man is made "o ) e o!r man4 ,9 t deep ,=ce1 ! la/ fact beh9d :i* analysis _c g1 all psy*ical & bodily effects f9d _! common orig940 ,?is /atem5t ne$s to be qualifi$ by ! ass]tion ( man's e?ical nature & di/9ct p]sonality2 see section ( ?is "w on ,e?ical ,monism1 9 *apt] ,,iii4 ,b !re is tru? "h l t :i* ,col]idge s\ght to express 9 8 olian ,h>p3 8,& :at if all ( animat$ ,nature ,be b organic h>ps div]sely fram$1 ,t tremble into ?\ght1 z o'er !m sweeps1 ,pla/ic & va/1 "o intellectual breeze1 ,at once ! s\l ( ea*1 & ,god ( all80 ,see ,f4 ,w4 ,h4 ,my]s1 ,human ,p]sonality4 ,dorn]1 ,sy/em ( ,!ology1 #a3ge--8,! consci\sness ( ,god is ! true fa/ness ( our self-consci\sness4444 ,s9ce x is only 9 ! ,god-consci\s man t ! inn]mo/ p]sonality comes to light1 9 l mann]1 by means ( ! int]weav+ ( t consci\sness ( ,god & ( ! _w1 ! _w is view$ 9 ,god 7#8sub specie et]nitatis'71 & ! c]ta9ty ( ! _w fir/ obta9s its absolute security = ! _s40 ,royce1 ,_s ( ,mod4 ,philosophy1 synopsis 9 ,n4 ,y4 ,nation3 8,! "o indubitable fact is ! exi/5ce ( an inf9ite self1 a ,logos or ,_w-m9d 7#cde74 ,t x exi/s is cle>1 ,i4 ,because idealism %[s t real ?+s are no?+ m nor less ?an ideas1 or #8possibilities ( exp]i5ce'2 b a m]e #8possibility'1 z su*1 is no?+1 & a _w ( #8possible' exp]i5ces1 9 s f> z x is real1 mu/ be a _w ( actual exp]i5ce to "s self 7#cfg74 ,if !n !re be a real _w1 x has all ! :ile exi/$ z ideal & m5tal1 ev5 be=e x became kn[n to ! p>ticul> m9d ) :i* we conceive x z com+ into connection 7#cfh74 ,,ii4 ,b !re is su* a real _w2 =1 :5 ,i ?9k ( an object1 :5 ,i mean x1 ,i d n m]ely h 9 m9d an idea resembl+ x1 = ,i aim at ! object1 ,i pick x out1 ,i already 9 "s measure possess x4 ,! object is !n already pres5t 9 ess5ce to my hidd5 self 7#cgj74 ,z tru? consi/s 9 k ( ! con=mity ( a cognition to its object1 t alone c "k a tru? :i* includes )9 itself bo? idea & object4 ,?is inclusive ,kn[] is ! ,inf9ite ,self 7#cgd74 ,) ?is ,i am 9 ess5ce id5tical 7#cga72 x is my l>g] self 7#cgb72 & ?is l>g] self alone is 7#cgi74 ,x includes all reality1 & we "k o!r f9ite m9ds1 because we are "o ) !m 9 its unity0 7#dji74 ,! exp]i5ce ( ,george ,john ,romanes is in/ructive4 ,= ye>s he c\ld recognize no p]sonal ,intellig5ce controll+ ! univ]se4 ,he made f\r mi/akes3 #a4 ,he =got t only love c see1 t ,god is n disclos$ to ! m]e intellect1 b only to ! :ole man1 to ! integral m9d1 to :at ! ,scripture calls 8! eyes ( y\r he>t0 7,eph4 #a3ah74 ,exp]i5ce ( life taught him at la/ ! weakness ( m]e reason+1 & l$ him to dep5d m ^u ! affections & intuitions4 ,!n1 z "o might say1 he gave ! ,x-rays ( ,*ri/ianity a *ance to photograph ,god ^u 8 s\l4 #b4 ,he began at ! wrong end1 ) matt] r ?an ) m9d1 ) cause & effect r ?an ) "r & wrong1 & s got involv$ 9 ! me*anical ord] & tri$ to int]pret ! moral realm by x4 ,! result 0 t in/ead ( recogniz+ fre$om1 responsibility1 s91 guilt1 he ?rew !m out z pret5d]s4 ,b /udy ( consci5ce & w set him "r4 ,he le>n$ to take :at be f\nd in/ead ( try+ to turn x into some?+ else1 & s came to int]pret nature by _s1 in/ead ( int]pret+ _s by nature4 #c4 ,he took ! ,cosmos by bits1 in/ead ( reg>d+ x z a :ole4 ,8 e>ly ?9k+ insi/$ on f9d+ design 9 ea* p>ticul> "p1 or n[h]e4 ,b 8 m mature ?\ght recogniz$ wisdom & reason 9 ! ord]$ :ole4 ,z he realiz$ t ?is is a univ]se1 he c\ld n get rid ( ! idea ( an organiz+ ,m9d4 ,he came to see t ! ,univ]se1 z a ?\ght1 implies a ,?9k]4 #d4 ,he fanci$ t nature excludes ,god1 in/ead ( be+ only ! me?od ( ,god's work+4 ,:5 he le>n$ h[ a ?+ 0 done1 he at fir/ conclud$ t ,god _h n done x4 ,8 lat] ?\ght recogniz$ t ,god & nature are n mutually exclusive4 ,s he came to f9d no difficulty ev5 9 miracles & inspiration2 = ! ,god :o is 9 man & ( ^: m9d & w nature is only ! expression1 c reveal himself1 if ne$ be1 9 special ways4 ,s ,george ,john ,romanes came back to pray]1 to ,*ri/1 to ! *ur*4 ,on ! g5]al subject ( intuition z connect$ ) our idea ( ,god1 see ,ladd1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahgg3a-cf1 #faa-faf2 #ahgh3fai2 ,fi%]1 on ,f9al ,cause & ,intuition1 9 ,j\rn4 ,*ri/4 ,philos41 ,jan4 #ahhc3aac-acd2 ,patton1 on ,g5esis ( ,idea ( ,god1 9 ,j\r4 ,*ri/4 ,philos41 ,apl4 #ahhc3bhc-cjg2 ,mc,cosh1 ,*ri/ianity & ,positivism1 #abd-adj2 ,mansel1 9 ,encyc4 ,brit41 #h? ed41 vol4 #ad3fjd & #fae2 ,rob]t ,hall1 s]mon on ,a!ism2 ,hutton1 on ,a!ism1 9 ,essays1 #a3c-cg2 ,%airp1 9 ,pr9ceton ,rev41 ,m>*1 #ahha3bfd4 ,*apt] ,,ii4 ,corroborative ,evid5ces ,( ,god's ,exi/5ce4 ,al?\gh ! k ( ,god's exi/5ce is intuitive1 x may be explicat$ & confirm$ by argum5ts drawn f ! actual univ]se & f ! ab/ract ideas ( ! human m9d4 ,rem>k #a4 ,^! argum5ts are probable1 n demon/rative4 ,= ?is reason !y supplem5t ea* o!r1 & con/itute a s]ies ( evid5ces :i* is cumulative 9 its nature4 ,?\gh1 tak5 s+ly1 none ( !m c be consid]$ absolutely decisive1 !y toge!r furni% a corroboration ( our primitive conviction ( ,god's exi/5ce1 :i* is ( great practical value1 & is 9 itself suffici5t to b9d ! moral action ( m54 ,butl]1 ,analogy1 ,introd41 ,bohn's ed41 #gb--,probable evid5ce admits ( degrees1 f ! highe/ moral c]ta9ty to ! l[e/ presumption4 ,yet probability is ! guide ( life4 ,9 matt]s ( morals & religion1 we are n to expect ma!matical or demon/rative1 b only probable1 evid5ce1 & ! slighte/ prepond]ance ( su* evid5ce may be suffici5t to b9d our moral action4 ,! tru? ( our religion1 l ! tru? ( common matt]s1 is to be judg$ by ! :ole evid5ce tak5 toge!r2 = probable pro(s1 by be+ add$1 n only increase ! evid5ce1 b multiply x4 ,dove1 ,logic ( ,*ri/4 ,fai?1 #bd--,value ( ! argum5ts tak5 toge!r is mu* great] ?an t ( any s+le "o4 ,illu/rat$ f wat]1 air & food1 toge!r b n sep>ately1 support+ life2 value ( #ajjj note1 n 9 pap]1 /amp1 writ+1 signature1 tak5 sep>ately4 ,a :ole bundle ( rods _c be brok51 ?\gh ea* rod 9 ! bundle may be brok5 sep>ately4 ,! /r5g? ( ! bundle is ! /r5g? ( ! :ole4 ,"l ,bacon1 ,essay on ,a!ism3 8,a little philosophy incl9e? man's m9d to a!ism1 b dep? 9 philosophy br+e? m5's m9ds ab\t to religion4 ,= :ile ! m9d ( man looke? ^u second causes scatt]$1 x may sometimes re/ 9 !m & g no fur!r1 b1 :5 x beholde? ! *a9 ( !m conf$]ate & l9k$ toge!r1 x mu/ ne$s fly to ,provid5ce & ,deity40 ,murphy1 ,sci5tific ,bases ( ,fai?1 #bba-bbc--8,! pro( ( a ,god & ( a spiritual _w :i* is to satisfy u mu/ consi/ 9 a numb] ( diff]5t b conv]g+ l9es ( pro(40 ,9 a case :]e only circum/antial evid5ce is atta9able1 _m l9es ( pro( sometimes conv]ge1 & ?\gh no "o ( ! l9es rea*es ! m>k1 ! conclusion to :i* !y all po9t becomes ! only rational "o4 ,to d\bt t !re is a ,london1 or t !re 0 a ,napoleon1 w\ld indicate insanity2 yet ,london & ,napoleon are prov$ by only probable evid5ce4 ,!re is no con/ra9+ efficacy 9 ! argum5ts = ,god's exi/5ce2 b ! same c be said ( all reason+ t is n demon/rative4 ,ano!r int]pretation ( ! facts is possible1 b no o!r conclusion is s satisfactory1 z t ,god is2 see ,fi%]1 ,nature & ,me?od ( ,revelation1 #abi4 ,pr(4 ,rog]s3 8,if 9 practical affairs we 7 to hesitate to act until we _h absolute & demon/rative c]ta9ty1 we %\ld nev] beg9 to move at all40 ,= ?is reason an old ,indian (ficial advis$ a "y ,indian judge 8always to give 8 v]dict1 b always to avoid giv+ ! gr\nds ( x40 ,b[ne1 ,philos4 ( ,!ism1 #aa-ad--8;,in/ead ( d\bt+ ev]y?+ t c be d\bt$1 let u r d\bt no?+ until we are compell$ to d\bt4444 ,9 society we get on bett] by assum+ t m5 are tru?ful1 & by d\bt+ only = special reasons1 ?an we %\ld if we assum$ t all m5 are li>s1 & believ$ !m only :5 compell$4 ,s 9 all our inve/igations we make m progress if we assume ! tru?fulness ( ! univ]se & ( our own nature ?an we %\ld if we d\bt$ bo?4444 ,! fir/ me?od seems ! m rigor\s1 b x c be appli$ only to ma!matics1 :i* is a purely subjective sci5ce4 ,:5 we come to deal ) reality1 ! me?od br+s ?\ght to a /&/ill4444 ,! law ! logician lays d[n is ?is3 ,no?+ may be believ$ :i* is n prov$4 ,! law ! m9d actually foll[s is ?is3 ,:atev] ! m9d dem&s = ! satisfaction ( its subjective int]e/s & t5d5cies may be assum$ z real1 9 default ( positive dispro(40 ,rem>k #b4 ,a consid]ation ( ^! argum5ts may also s]ve to explicate ! cont5ts ( an intuition :i* has rema9$ obscure & only half consci\s = lack ( reflection4 ,! argum5ts1 inde$1 are ! ef=ts ( ! m9d t already has a conviction ( ,god's exi/5ce to give to itself a =mal acc\nt ( its belief4 ,an exact e/imate ( _! logical value & ( _! relation to ! intuition :i* !y seek to express 9 syllogi/ic =m1 is ess5tial to any prop] refutation ( ! preval5t a!i/ic & pan!i/ic reason+4 ,diman1 ,!i/ic ,argum5t1 #cfc--8,nor h ,i claim$ t ! exi/5ce1 ev51 ( ?is ,be+ c be demon/rat$ z we demon/rate ! ab/ract tru?s ( sci5ce4 ,i h only claim$ t ! univ]se1 z a great fact1 dem&s a rational explanation1 & t ! mo/ rational explanation t c possibly be giv5 is t furni%$ 9 ! conception ( su* a ,be+4 ,9 ?is conclusion reason re/s1 & refuses to re/ 9 any o!r40 ,rck]t3 8,w] ,gott ni*t fhlt 9 si* und all5 ,leb5skreis51 ,dem w]det ihr ni*t ihn beweis5 mit ,beweis540 ,h>ris1 ,philos4 ,basis ( ,!ism1 #cjg--8,!ology dep5ds on noetic & empirical sci5ce to give ! occasion on :i* ! idea ( ! ,absolute ,be+ arises1 & to give cont5t to ! idea40 ,&rew ,full]1 ,"p ( ,sy/4 ( ,div941 #d3bhc1 que/ions 8:e!r argum5tation 9 favor ( ! exi/5ce ( ,god has n made m sceptics ?an believ]s40 ,s f> z ?is is true1 x is due to an ov]/atem5t ( ! argum5ts & an exagg]at$ notion ( :at is to be expect$ f !m4 ,see ,nitzs*1 ,*ri/ian ,doctr9e1 translation1 #adj2 ,ebr>d1 ,dogmatik1 #a3aai1 #abj2 ,fi%]1 ,essays on ,sup]natural ,orig9 ( ,*ri/ianity1 #egb1 #egc2 ,van ,oo/]zee1 #bch1 #bda4 8,evid5ces ( ,*ri/ianity80 said ,col]idge1 8,i am we>y ( ! ^w40 ,! m ,*ri/ianity 0 prov$1 ! less x 0 believ$4 ,! revival ( religion "u ,:itefield & ,wesley did :at all ! apologi/s ( ! eighte5? c5tury c\ld n d1--x quick5$ m5's intuitions into life1 & made !m practically recognize ,god4 ,m>t9eau1 ,types1 #b3bca--,m5 c 8b[ ! knee to ! pass+ ,zeitgei/1 :ile turn+ ! back to ! cons5sus ( all ! ages02 ,seat ( ,au?ority1 #cab--8,our reason+s lead to explicit ,!ism because !y />t f implicit ,!ism40 ,ill+wor?1 ,div4 & ,hum4 ,p]sonality1 #ha--8,! pro(s are 444 attempts to acc\nt = & expla9 & ju/ify some?+ t already exi/s2 to decompose a highly complex ?\gh imm$iate judgm5t into its con/itu5t elem5ts1 none ( :i* :5 isolat$ c h ! complet5ess or ! cog5cy ( ! orig9al conviction tak5 z a :ole40 ,b[ne1 ,philos4 ( ,!ism1 #ca1 #cb--8;,demon/ration is only a make%ift = help+ ignorance to insight4444 ,:5 we come to an argum5t 9 :i* ! :ole nature is address$1 ! argum5t mu/ seem weak or /rong1 accord+ z ! nature is feebly1 or fully1 develop$4 ,! moral argum5t = !ism _c seem /rong to "o )\t a consci5ce4 ,! argum5t f cognitive int]e/s w be empty :5 !re is no cognitive int]e/4 ,little s\ls f9d v little t calls = explanation or t excites surprise1 & !y are satisfi$ ) a correspond+ly small view ( life & exi/5ce4 ,9 su* a case we _c hope = univ]sal agreem5t4 ,we c only proclaim ! fai? t is 9 u1 9 hope t ?is proclamation may n be )\t "s response 9 o!r m9ds & he>ts4444 ,we h only probable evid5ce = ! uni=mity ( nature or = ! affection ( fri5ds4 ,we _c logically prove ei!r4 ,! deepe/ convictions are n ! c]ta9ties ( logic1 b ! c]ta9ties ( life40 ,rem>k #c4 ,! argum5ts = ! div9e exi/5ce may be r$uc$ to f\r1 namely3 ,i4 ,! ,cosmological2 ,,ii4 ,! ,teleological2 ,,iii4 ,! ,an?ropological2 & ,,iv4 ,! ,ontological4 ,we %all exam9e ^! 9 ord]1 seek+ fir/ to det]m9e ! precise conclusions to :i* !y respectively lead1 & !n to asc]ta9 9 :at mann] ! f\r may be comb9$4 ,i4 ,! ,cosmological ,argum5t1 or ,argum5t f ,*ange 9 ,nature4 ,?is is n prop]ly an argum5t f effect to cause2 = ! proposition t e effect mu/ h a cause is simply id5tical1 & means only t e caus$ ev5t mu/ h a cause4 ,x is r an argum5t f begun exi/5ce to a suffici5t cause ( t beg9n+1 & may be accurately /at$ z foll[s3 ,ev]y?+ begun1 :e!r sub/ance or ph5om5on1 owes its exi/5ce to "s produc+ cause4 ,! univ]se1 at lea/ s f> z its pres5t =m is conc]n$1 is a ?+ begun1 & owes its exi/5ce to a cause :i* is equal to its production4 ,?is cause mu/ be indef9itely great4 ,x is to be notic$ t ?is argum5t moves :olly 9 ! realm ( nature4 ,! argum5t f man's con/itution & beg9n+ ^u ! planet is treat$ "u ano!r head 7see ,an?ropological ,argum5t74 ,t ! pres5t =m ( ! univ]se is n et]nal 9 ! pa/1 b has begun to be1 n only p]sonal obs]vation b ! te/imony ( geology assures u4 ,= /atem5ts ( ! argum5t1 see ,kant1 ,critique ( ,pure ,reason 7,bohn's transl471 #cgj2 ,gillespie1 ,necess>y ,exi/5ce ( ,god1 #h3cd-dd2 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahdi3fac2 #ahej3fac2 ,port]1 ,hum4 ,intellect1 #egj2 ,h]b]t ,sp5c]1 ,fir/ ,pr9ciples1 #ic4 ,x has (t5 be5 claim$1 z by ,locke1 ,cl>ke1 & ,rob]t ,hall1 t ?is argum5t is suffici5t to conduct ! m9d to an ,et]nal & ,inf9ite ,fir/ ,cause4 ,we proce$ !re=e to m5tion #a4 ,! defects ( ! ,cosmological ,argum5t4 ,a4 ,x is impossible to %[ t ! univ]se1 s f> z its sub/ance is conc]n$1 has _h a beg9n+4 ,! law ( causality decl>es1 n t ev]y?+ has a cause--= !n ,god himself mu/ h a cause--b r t ev]y?+ begun has a cause1 or 9 o!r words1 t e ev5t or *ange has a cause4 ,hume1 ,philos4 ,works1 #b3daa sq41 urges ) reason t we nev] saw a _w made4 ,_m philosoph]s 9 ,*ri/ian l&s1 z ,m>t9eau1 ,essays1 #a3bjf1 & ! prevail+ op9ions ( ante-,*ri/ian times1 h held matt] to be et]nal4 ,b[ne1 ,metaphysics1 #ajg--8;,= be+ itself1 ! reflective reason nev] asks a cause1 unless ! be+ %[ signs ( dep5d5ce4 ,x is *ange t fir/ gives rise to ! dem& = cause40 ,m>t9eau1 ,types1 #a3bia--8;,x is n exi/5ce1 z su*1 t dem&s a cause1 b ! com+ into exi/5ce ( :at did n exi/ be=e4 ,! intellectual law ( causality is a law = ph5om5a1 & n = entity40 ,see also ,mc,cosh1 ,intuitions1 #bbe-bda2 ,cald]wood1 ,philos4 ( ,inf9ite1 #fa4 ,p] contra1 see ,murphy1 ,sci5t4 ,bases ( ,fai?1 #di1 #aie1 & ,habit & ,intellig5ce1 #a3ee-fg2 ,knight1 ,lect4 on ,metaphysics1 lect4 ii1 p4 #ai4 ,b4 ,grant+ t ! univ]se1 s f> z its ph5om5a are conc]n$1 has _h a cause1 x is impossible to %[ t any o!r cause is requir$ ?an a cause )9 itself1 su* z ! pan!i/ supposes4 ,fl9t1 ,!ism1 #fe--8,! cosmological argum5t alone proves only =ce1 & no m]e =ce is ,god4 ,intellig5ce mu/ g ) p[] to make a ,be+ t c be call$ ,god40 ,diman1 ,!i/ic ,argum5t3 8,! cosmological argum5t alone _c decide :e!r ! =ce t causes *ange is p]man5t self-exi/5t m9d1 or p]man5t self-exi/5t matt]40 ,only intellig5ce gives ! basis = an answ]4 ,only m9d 9 ! univ]se enables u to inf] m9d 9 ! mak]4 ,b ! argum5t f intellig5ce is n ! ,cosmological1 b ! ,teleological1 & to ?is la/ belong all pro(s ( ,deity f ord] & comb9ation 9 nature4 ,upton1 ,hibb]t ,lectures1 #bja-bif--,sci5ce has to d ) ^? *anges :i* "o portion ( ! visible univ]se causes 9 ano!r portion4 ,philosophy & !ology deal ) ! ,inf9ite ,cause :i* br+s into exi/5ce & su/a9s ! entire s]ies ( f9ite causes4 ,d we ask ! cause ( ! />s8 ,sci5ce says3 ,fire-mi/1 or an inf9ite regress ( causes4 ,!ology says3 ,grant$2 b ?is inf9ite regress dem&s = its explanation ! belief 9 ,god4 ,we mu/ believe bo? 9 ,god1 & 9 an endless s]ies ( f9ite causes4 ,god is ! cause ( all causes1 ! s\l ( all s\ls3 8,c5tre & s\l ( e sph]e1 ,yet to ea* lov+ he>t h[ ne>60 ,we d n ne$1 z m]e matt] ( sci5ce1 to ?9k ( any beg9n+4 ,c4 ,grant+ t ! univ]se mo/ h _h a cause outside ( itself1 x is impossible to %[ t ?is cause has n itself be5 caus$1 i4 e41 consi/s ( an inf9ite s]ies ( dep5d5t causes4 ,! pr9ciple ( causality does n require t ev]y?+ begun %\ld be trac$ back to an uncaus$ cause2 x dem&s t we %\ld assign a cause1 b n t we %\ld assign a fir/ cause4 ,s ) ! :ole s]ies ( causes4 ,! mat]iali/ is b\nd to f9d a cause = ?is s]ies1 only :5 ! s]ies is %[n to h _h a beg9n+4 ,b ! v hypo!sis ( an inf9ite s]ies ( causes excludes ! idea ( su* a beg9n+4 ,an inf9ite *a9 has no topmo/ l9k 7v]sus ,rob]t ,hall72 an uncaus$ & et]nal succession does n ne$ a cause 7v]sus ,cl>ke & ,locke74 ,see ,:ately1 ,logic1 #bgj2 ,new ,engl&]1 ,jan4 #ahgd3ge2 ,alex&]1 ,moral ,sci5ce1 #bba2 ,pfleid]]1 ,die ,religion1 #a3afj-afd2 ,cald]wood1 ,moral ,philos41 #bbe2 ,h]b]t ,sp5c]1 ,fir/ ,pr9ciples1 #cg--;criticiz$ by ,b[ne1 ,review ( ,h4 ,sp5c]1 #cf4 ,julius ,mll]1 ,doct4 ,s91 #b3abh1 says t ! causal pr9ciple is n satisfi$ till by regress we come to a cause :i* is n itself an effect--to "o :o is causa sui2 ,aids to ,/udy ( ,g]man ,!ology1 #ae-ag--;,ev5 if ! univ]se be et]nal1 its cont+5t & relative nature requires u to po/ulate an et]nal ,creator2 ,diman1 ,!i/ic ,argum5t1 #hf--8,:ile ! law ( causation does n lead logically up to ! conclusion ( a fir/ cause1 x compels u to affirm x40 ,we reply t x is n ! law ( causation :i* compels u to affirm x1 = ?is c]ta9ly 8does n lead logically up to ! conclusion40 ,if we inf] an uncaus$ cause1 we d x1 n by logical process1 b by virtue ( ! intuitive belief )9 u4 ,s sub/antially ,secretan1 & ,:ewell1 9 ,indications ( a ,creator1 & 9 ,hi/4 ( ,sci5tific ,ideas1 #b3cba1 #cbb--8,! m9d takes refuge1 9 ! assumption ( a ,fir/ ,cause1 f an employm5t inconsi/5t ) its own nature02 8we necess>ily inf] a ,fir/ ,cause1 al?\gh ! paltiological sci5ces only po9t t[>d x1 b d n lead u to x40 ,d4 ,grant+ t ! cause ( ! univ]se has n itself be5 caus$1 x is impossible to %[ t ?is cause is n f9ite1 l ! univ]se itself4 ,! causal pr9ciple requires a cause no great] ?an j suffici5t to acc\nt = ! effect4 ,we _c !re=e inf] an inf9ite cause1 unless ! univ]se is inf9ite--:i* _c be prov$1 b c only be assum$--& ?is is assum+ an inf9ite 9 ord] to prove an inf9ite4 ,all we "k ( ! univ]se is f9ite4 ,an inf9ite univ]se implies inf9ite numb]4 ,b no numb] c be inf9ite1 = to any numb]1 h[ev] great1 a unit c be add$1 :i* %[s t x 0 n inf9ite be=e4 ,"h aga9 we see t ! mo/ approv$ =ms ( ! ,cosmological ,argum5t are oblig$ to avail !mselves ( ! intuition ( ! inf9ite1 to supplem5t ! logical process4 ,v]sus ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy1 #a3daf--8,?\gh we _c directly inf] ! inf9itude ( ,god f a limit$ creation1 indirectly we may exclude e o!r position by resort to its unlimit$ sc5e ( exi/5ce 7space740 ,b ?is w\ld equally w>rant our belief 9 ! inf9itude ( our fell[ m54 ,or1 x is ! argum5t ( ,cl>ke & ,gillespie 7see ,ontological ,argum5t bel[74 ,s*ill]1 ,die ,grsse d] ,welt1 seems to hold to a b\ndless univ]se4 ,he repres5ts a tir$ _s z seek+ ! la/ limit ( creation4 ,a second pilgrim meets him f ! spaces beyond ) ! words3 8,/eh6 du segel/ umson/1--vor dir ,un5dli*keit0--8,hold6 ?\ j\rneye/ 9 va91--be=e !e is only ,inf9ity40 ,on ! law ( p>simony1 see ,sir ,wm4 ,hamilton1 ,discussions1 #fbh4 #b4 ,! value ( ! ,cosmological ,argum5t1 !n1 is simply ?is1--x proves ! exi/5ce ( "s cause ( ! univ]se indef9itely great4 ,:5 we g beyond ?is & ask :e!r ?is cause is a cause ( be+1 or m]ely a cause ( *ange1 to ! univ]se2 :e!r x is a cause ap>t f ! univ]se1 or "o ) x2 :e!r x is an et]nal cause1 or a cause dep5d5t ^u "s o!r cause2 :e!r x is intellig5t or un9tellig5t1 inf9ite or f9ite1 "o or _m1--?is argum5t _c assure u4 ,on ! :ole argum5t1 see ,fl9t1 ,!ism1 #ic-acj2 ,mozley1 ,essays1 ,hi/4 & ,!ol41 #b3dad-ddd2 ,h$ge1 ,ways ( ! ,_s1 #adh-aed2 ,/udi5 und ,kritik51 #ahgf3i-ca4 ,,ii4 ,! ,teleological ,argum5t1 or ,argum5t f ,ord] & ,useful ,collocation 9 ,nature4 ,?is is n prop]ly an argum5t f design to a design]2 = t design implies a design] is simply an id5tical proposition4 ,x may be m correctly /at$ z foll[s3 ,ord] & useful collocation p]vad+ a sy/em respectively imply intellig5ce & purpose z ! cause ( t ord] & collocation4 ,s9ce ord] & useful collocation p]vade ! univ]se1 !re mu/ exi/ an intellig5ce adequate to ! production ( ?is ord]1 & a w adequate to direct ?is collocation to useful ends4 ,etymologically1 8teleological argum5t0 argum5t to ends or f9al causes1 t is1 8causes :i*1 beg9n+ z a ?\ght1 "w !mselves out into a fact z an end or result0 7,port]1 ,hum4 ,intellect1 #eib-fah72--;heal?1 = example1 is ! f9al cause ( ex]cise1 :ile ex]cise is ! effici5t cause ( heal?4 ,?is def9ition ( ! argum5t w\ld be broad en\gh to cov] ! pro( ( a design+ intellig5ce drawn f ! con/itution ( man4 ,?is la/1 h[ev]1 is treat$ z a "p ( ! ,an?ropological ,argum5t1 :i* foll[s ?is1 & ! ,teleological ,argum5t cov]s only ! pro( ( a design+ intellig5ce drawn f nature4 ,h5ce ,kant1 ,critique ( ,pure ,reason 7,bohn's trans471 #cha1 calls x ! physico-!ological argum5t4 ,on me?ods ( /at+ ! argum5t1 see ,bib4 ,sac41 ,oct4 #ahfg3fbe4 ,see also ,h$ge1 ,ways ( ! ,_s1 #aee-ahe2 ,mozley1 ,essays ,hi/4 & ,!ol41 #b3cfe-dac4 ,hicks1 9 8 ,critique ( ,design-,argum5ts1 #cdg-chi1 makes two argum5ts in/ead ( "o3 7#a7 ! argum5t f ord] to intellig5ce1 to :i* he gives ! "n ,eutaxiological2 7#b7 ! argum5t f adaptation to purpose1 to :i* he w\ld re/rict ! "n ,teleological4 ,he holds t teleology prop] _c prove intellig5ce1 because 9 speak+ ( 8ends0 at all1 x mu/ assume ! v intellig5ce :i* x seeks to prove2 t x actually does prove simply ! int5tional ex]cise ( an intellig5ce ^: exi/5ce has be5 previ\sly e/abli%$4 8,circum/ances1 =ces or ag5cies conv]g+ to a def9ite rational result imply volition--imply t ?is result is int5d$--is an end4 ,?is is ! major premise ( ?is new teleology40 ,he objects to ! t]m 8f9al cause40 ,! end is n a cause at all--x is a motive4 ,! *>act]i/ic elem5t ( cause is p[] to produce an effect4 ,ends h no su* p[]4 ,! w may *oose !m or set !m aside4 ,z already assum+ intellig5ce1 ends _c prove intellig5ce4 ,) ?is 9 ! ma9 we agree1 & c\nt x a valuable help to ! /atem5t & und]/&+ ( ! argum5t4 ,9 ! v obs]vation ( ord]1 h[ev]1 z well z 9 argu+ f x1 we are oblig$ to assume ! same all-arrang+ intellig5ce4 ,we see no objection !re=e to mak+ ,eutaxiology ! fir/ "p ( ! ,teleological ,argum5t1 z we d above4 ,see review ( ,hicks1 9 ,me?4 ,qu>4 ,rev41 ,july1 #ahhc3efi-egf4 ,we proce$ h[ev] to c]ta9 #a4 ,fur!r explanations4 ,a4 ,! major premise expresses a primitive conviction4 ,x is n invalidat$ by ! objections3 7a7 t ord] & useful collocation may exi/ )\t be+ purpos$--= we are compell$ by our v m5tal con/itution to d5y ?is 9 all cases :]e ! ord] & collocation p]vade a sy/em3 7b7 t ord] & useful collocation may result f ! m]e op]ation ( physical =ces & laws--= ^! v =ces & laws imply1 in/ead ( exclud+1 an orig9at+ & sup]9t5d+ intellig5ce & w4 ,janet1 9 8 "w on ,f9al ,causes1 #h1 d5ies t f9ality is a primitive conviction1 l causality1 & calls x ! result ( an induction4 ,he !re=e proce$s f 7#a7 m>ks ( ord] & useful collocation to 7#b7 f9ality 9 nature1 & !n to 7#c7 an intellig5t cause ( ?is f9ality or 8pre-con=mity to future ev5t40 ,s ,diman1 ,!i/ic ,argum5t1 #aje1 claims simply t1 z *ange requires cause1 s ord]ly *ange requires intellig5t cause4 ,we h %[n1 h[ev]1 t induction & argum5t ( e k9d presupposes intuitive belief 9 f9al cause4 ,nature does n give u f9al cause2 b no m does %e give u effici5t cause4 ,m9d gives u bo?1 & gives !m z cle>ly ^u "o exp]i5ce z aft] a ?\s&4 ,ladd3 8,?+s h m9d 9 !m3 else !y c\ld n be m9d$ by u40 ,! ,duke ( ,argyll told ,d>w9 t x seem$ to him :olly impossible to ascribe ! adju/m5ts ( nature to any o!r ag5cy ?an t ( m9d4 8,well10 said ,d>w91 8t impression has (t5 come ^u me ) ov]p[]+ =ce4 ,b !n1 at o!r times1 x all seems--20 & !n he pass$ 8 h&s ov] 8 eyes1 z if to indicate ! pass+ ( a vision out ( sight4 ,d>w9ism is n a refutation ( ends 9 nature1 b only ( a p>ticul> !ory ) reg>d to ! way 9 :i* ends are realiz$ 9 ! organic _w4 ,d>w9 w\ld beg9 ) an inf9itesimal g]m1 & make all ! subsequ5t developm5t unteleological2 see ,s*urman1 ,belief 9 ,god1 #aic4 7a7 ,illu/ration ( unpurpos$ ord] 9 ! s+le ?r[+ ( 8d\ble sixes10--con/ant ?r[+ ( d\ble sixes indicates design4 ,s arrangem5t ( detritus at m\? ( riv]1 & w>m+ pans s5t to ! ,we/ ,indies1--useful b n purpos$4 ,mom]ie1 ,*ri/ianity & ,evolution1 #gb--8;,x is only )9 n>r[ limits t seem+ly purposeful arrangem5ts are produc$ by *ance4 ,& !re=e1 z ! signs ( purpose increase1 ! presumption 9 favor ( _! accid5tal orig9 dim9i%es40 ,eld]1 ,ideas f ,nature1 #ha1 #hb--8,! uni=mity ( a boy's m>bles %[s !m to be products ( design4 ,a s+le "o might be accid5tal1 b a doz5 _c be4 ,s atomic uni=mity indicates manufacture40 ,illu/rations ( purpos$ ord]1 9 ,beattie's g>d51 ,tillotson's bl9d m51 ,kepl]'s salad4 ,dr4 ,c>p5t]3 8,! a!i/ is l a man exam9+ ! ma*9]y ( a great mill1 :o1 f9d+ t ! :ole is mov$ by a %aft proce$+ f a brick wall1 inf]s t ! %aft is a suffici5t explanation ( :at he sees1 & t !re is no mov+ p[] beh9d x40 ,"l ,kelv93 8,! a!i/ic idea is nons5sical40 ,j4 ,g4 ,paton1 ,life1 #b3aia--,! s9k+ ( a well on ! isl& ( ,aniwa conv9ces ! cannibal *ief ,namakei t ,jehovah ,god exi/s1 ! invisible ,"o4 ,see ,*auncey ,wright1 9 ,n4 ,y4 ,nation1 ,jan4 #ae1 #ahgd2 ,murphy1 ,sci5tific ,bases ( ,fai?1 #bjh4 7b7 ,b[ne1 ,review ( ,h]b]t ,sp5c]1 #bca-bdg--8,law is me?od1 n cause4 ,a man _c (f] ! v fact to be expla9$1 z its suffici5t explanation40 ,m>t9eau1 ,essays1 #a3add--8,patt]n$ damask1 made n by ! weav]1 b by ! loom80 ,dr4 ,/ev5son3 8,h\se requires no ar*itect1 because x is built by /one-masons & c>p5t]s80 ,joseph ,cook3 8,natural law )\t ,god beh9d x is no m ?an a glove )\t a h& 9 x1 & all t is done by ! glov$ h& ( ,god 9 nature is done by ! h& & n by ! glove4 ,evolution is a process1 n a p[]2 a me?od ( op]ation1 n an op]ator4 ,a book is n writt5 by ! laws ( spell+ & gramm>1 b accord+ to ^? laws4 ,s ! book ( ! univ]se is n writt5 by ! laws ( heat1 electricity1 gravitation1 evolution1 b accord+ to ^? laws40 ,g4 ,f4 ,wright1 ,ant4 & ,orig4 ( ,hum4 ,race1 lecture ,,ix--8,x is impossible = evolution to furni% evid5ce :i* %all drive design out ( nature4 ,x c only drive x back to an e>li] po9t ( entrance1 !reby increas+ our admiration = ! p[] ( ! ,creator to accompli% ult]ior designs by unlikely means40 ,evolution is only ! me?od ( ,god4 ,x has to d ) ! h[1 n ) ! :y1 ( ph5om5a1 & !re=e is n inconsi/5t ) design1 b r is a new & high] illu/ration ( design4 ,h5ry ,w>d ,bee*]3 8,design by :olesale is great] ?an design by retail40 ,frances ,p[] ,cobbe3 8,x is a s+ul> fact t1 :5ev] we f9d out h[ a ?+ is done1 our fir/ conclusion seems to be t ,god did n d x40 ,:y %\ld we say3 8,! m law1 ! less ,god80 ,! !i/ ref]s ! ph5om5a to a cause t kn[s itself & :at x is do+2 ! a!i/ ref]s !m to a p[] :i* kn[s no?+ ( itself & :at x is do+ 7,b[ne74 ,george ,john ,romanes said t1 if ,god be imman5t1 !n all natural causation mu/ appe> to be me*anical1 & x is no argum5t aga9/ ! div9e orig9 ( a ?+ to prove x due to natural causation3 8,causes 9 nature d n obviate ! necessity ( a cause 9 nature40 ,%al]1 ,int]pretation ( ,nature1 #dg--;,evolution %[s t ! direction ( affairs is "u control ( some?+ l our own intellig5ce3 8,evolution spells ,purpose40 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/4 ,!ology1 #aje--8,! mod]n doctr9e ( evolution has be5 awake to ! exi/5ce ( innum]able ends )9 ! univ]se1 b n to ! "o great end = ! univ]se itself40 ,huxley1 ,critiques & ,addresses1 #bgd1 #bge1 #cjg--8,! teleological & me*anical views ( ! univ]se are n mutually exclusive40 ,sir ,william ,hamilton1 ,metaphysics3 8,intellig5ce /&s fir/ 9 ! ord] ( exi/5ce4 ,effici5t causes are prec$$ by f9al causes40 ,see also ,?ornton1 ,old ,fa%ion$ ,e?ics1 #aii-bfe2 ,ar*bp4 ,temple1 ,bampton ,lect41 #ahhd3ii-abc2 ,ow51 ,anat4 ( ,v]tebrates1 #c3gif2 ,peirce1 ,ideality 9 ! ,physical ,sci5ces1 #a-ce2 ,newman ,smy?1 ,?r\gh ,sci5ce to ,fai?1 #if2 ,fi%]1 ,nat4 & ,me?4 ( ,rev41 #ace4 ,b4 ,! m9or premise expresses a work+-pr9ciple ( all sci5ce1 namely1 t all ?+s h _! uses1 t ord] p]vades ! univ]se1 & t ! me?ods ( nature are rational me?ods4 ,evid5ces ( ?is appe> 9 ! correlation ( ! *emical elem5ts to ea* o!r2 9 ! fitness ( ! inanimate _w to be ! basis & support ( life2 9 ! typical =ms & unity ( plan app>5t 9 ! organic creation2 9 ! exi/5ce & cop]ation ( natural laws2 9 cosmical ord] & comp5sations4 ,?is m9or premise is n invalidat$ by ! objections3 7a7 ,t we frequ5tly misund]/& ! end actually subs]v$ by natural ev5ts & objects2 = ! pr9ciple is1 n t we necess>ily "k ! actual end1 b t we necess>ily believe t !re is "s end1 9 e case ( sy/ematic ord] & collocation4 7b7 ,t ! ord] ( ! univ]se is manife/ly imp]fect2 = ?is1 if grant$1 w\ld argue1 n abs5ce ( contrivance1 b "s special reason = imp]fection1 ei!r 9 ! limitations ( ! contriv+ intellig5ce itself1 or 9 ! nature ( ! end s\ght 7z1 = example1 correspond5ce ) ! moral /ate & probation ( s9n]s74 ,! evid5ces ( ord] & useful collocation are f\nd bo? 9 ! indef9itely small & ! indef9itely great4 ,! molecules are manufactur$ articles2 & ! comp5sations ( ! sol> sy/em :i* provide t a secul> flatt5+ ( ! e>?'s orbit %all be made up = by a secul> r\nd+ ( t same orbit1 alike %[ an intellig5ce f> transc5d+ our own2 see ,cooke1 ,religion & ,*emi/ry1 & ,cr$5tials ( ,sci5ce1 #bc--8;,beauty is ! h>mony ( relations :i* p]fect fitness produces2 law is ! prevail+ pr9ciple :i* und]lies t h>mony4 ,h5ce bo? beauty & law imply design4 ,f en]gy1 fitness1 beauty1 ord]1 sacrifice1 we argue might1 skill1 p]fection1 law1 & love 9 a ,supreme ,intellig5ce4 ,*ri/ianity implies design1 & is ! completion ( ! design argum5t40 ,pfleid]]1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #a3afh--8;,a good def9ition ( beauty is imman5t purposiv5ess1 ! teleological ideal backgr\nd ( reality1 ! %9+ ( ! ,idea ?r\gh ph5om5a40 ,b[ne1 ,philos4 ,!ism1 #he--8;,design is nev] causal4 ,x is only ideal1 & x dem&s an effici5t cause = its realization4 ,if ice is n to s9k1 & to freeze out life1 !re mu/ be "s molecul> /ructure :i* %all make its bulk great] ?an t ( an equal weight ( wat]40 ,jackson1 ,!odore ,p>k]1 #cee--8,rudim5t>y organs are l ! sil5t lett]s 9 _m words1--bo? are witnesses to a pa/ hi/ory2 & !re is intellig5ce 9 _! pres]vation40 ,diman1 ,!i/ic ,argum5t3 8,n only d we obs]ve 9 ! _w ! *ange :i* is ! basis ( ! ,cosmological ,argum5t1 b we p]ceive t ?is *ange proce$s accord+ to a fix$ & inv>iable rule4 ,9 inorganic nature1 g5]al ord]1 or regul>ity2 9 organic nature1 special ord] or adaptation40 ,b[ne1 ,review ( ,h4 ,sp5c]1 #aac-aae1 #bbd-bcj3 8,inductive sci5ce proce$s ^u ! po/ulate t ! reasonable & ! natural are "o40 ,?is furni%$ ! guid+ clue to ,h>vey & ,cuvi]2 see ,:ewell1 ,hi/4 ,induct4 ,sci5ces1 #b3dhi-dia4 ,kant3 8,! anatomi/ mu/ assume t no?+ 9 man is 9 va940 ,ari/otle3 8,nature makes no?+ 9 va940 ,on molecules z manufactur$ articles1 see ,maxfield1 9 ,nature1 ,sept4 #be1 #ahgc4 ,see also ,tullo*1 ,!ism1 #aaf1 #abj2 ,le,conte1 ,religion & ,sci5ce1 lect4 #b & #c2 ,mc,cosh1 ,typical ,=ms1 #ha1 #dbj2 ,agassiz1 ,essay on ,classification1 #i1 #aj2 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahdi3fbf & #ahej3fac2 ,hopk9s1 9 ,pr9ceton ,review1 #ahhb3aha4 7a7 ,design1 9 fact t riv]s always run by l>ge t[ns8 t spr+s are always f\nd at gambl+ places8 ,plants made = man1 & man = worms8 ,voltaire3 8,noses are made = spectacles--let u we> !m60 ,pope3 8,:ile man exclaims #8,see all ?+s = my use1' #8,see man = m9e1' replies ! pamp]$ goose40 ,*]ries d n rip5 9 ! cold ( w9t] :5 !y d n ta/e z well1 & grapes d n rip5 9 ! heat ( summ] :5 ! new w9e w\ld turn to v9eg>8 ,nature divides melons into sections = conv5i5ce 9 family eat+8 ,cork-tree made = bottle-/opp]s8 ,! *ild :o 0 ask$ ! cause ( salt 9 ! ocean1 attribut$ x to codfi%1 ?us dimly conf\nd+ f9al cause ) effici5t cause4 ,tea*]3 8,:at are m>supials80 ,pupil3 8,animals t h p\*es 9 _! /oma*s40 ,tea*]3 8,& :at d !y h p\*es =80 ,pupil3 8,to crawl into & conceal !mselves 91 :5 !y are pursu$40 ,:y are ! days long] 9 summ] ?an 9 w9t]8 ,because x is ! prop]ty ( all natural objects to elongate "u ! influ5ce ( heat4 ,a ,j5a pr(essor held t doctors d n exi/ because ( disease1 b t diseases exi/ precisely 9 ord] t !re may be doctors4 ,kepl] 0 an a/ronomical ,don ,quixote4 ,he discuss$ ! claims ( elev5 diff]5t damsels to become 8 second wife1 & he lik5$ ! planets to huge animals ru%+ ?r\gh ! sky4 ,_m ( ! objections to design arise f conf\nd+ a "p ( ! creation ) ! :ole1 or a /ructure 9 ! process ( developm5t ) a /ructure complet$4 ,= illu/rations ( mi/ak5 ends1 see ,janet1 ,f9al ,causes4 7b7 ,alphonso ( ,ca/ile took (f5se at ! ,ptolemaic ,sy/em1 & intimat$ t1 if he _h be5 consult$ at ! creation1 he c\ld h sugge/$ valuable improvem5ts4 ,lange1 9 8 ,hi/ory ( ,mat]ialism1 illu/rates "s ( ! me?ods ( nature by millions ( gun b>rels %ot 9 all directions to kill a s+le h>e2 by t5 ?\s& keys b\ght at haphaz>d to get into a %ut room2 by build+ a city 9 ord] to obta9 a h\se4 ,is n ! ice a little ov]done ab\t ! poles8 ,see ,john ,/u>t ,mill's indictm5t ( nature1 9 8 po/hum\s ,essays on ,religion1 #bi--8,nature impales m51 breaks m5 z if on a :eel1 ca/s !m to be dev\r$ by wild bea/s1 cru%es !m ) /ones l ! fir/ ,*ri/ian m>tyr1 />ves !m ) hung]1 freezes !m ) cold1 poisons !m ) ! quick or sl[ v5om ( h] exhalations1 & has hundr$s ( o!r hide\s dea?s 9 res]ve1 su* z ! +5i\s cruelty ( a ,nabis or a ,domitian nev] surpass$40 ,s argue ,s*op5hau] & ,von ,h>tmann4 ,! doctr9e ( evolution answ]s _m ( ^! objections1 by %[+ t ord] & useful collocation 9 ! sy/em z a :ole is necess>ily & *eaply pur*as$ by imp]fection & suff]+ 9 ! initial /ages ( developm5t4 ,! "q is3 ,does ! sy/em z a :ole imply design8 ,my op9ion is ( no value z to ! usefulness ( an intricate ma*9e ! purpose ( :i* ,i d n "k4 ,if ,i /& at ! beg9n+ ( a road & d n "k :i!r x leads1 x is presumptu\s 9 me to po9t out a m direct way to its de/9ation4 ,b[ne1 ,philos4 ( ,!ism1 #bj-bb--8;,9 ord] to c\nt]balance ! impressions :i* app>5t disord] & immorality 9 nature make ^u u1 we h to assume t ! univ]se at its root is n only rational1 b good4 ,?is is fai?1 b x is an act on :i* our :ole moral life dep5ds40 ,metaphysics1 #afe--8,! same argum5t :i* w\ld d5y m9d 9 nature d5ies m9d 9 man40 ,fi%]1 ,nat4 & ,me?4 ( ,rev41 #bfd--8;,fifty ye>s ago1 :5 ! crane /ood on top ( ! t[] ( unf9i%$ ,cologne ,ca!dral1 0 !re no evid5ce ( design 9 ! :ole /ructure80 ,yet we conc$e t1 s long z we _c ) ,john ,/u>t ,mill expla9 ! imp]fections ( ! univ]se by any limitations 9 ! ,intellig5ce :i* contriv$ x1 we are %ut up to reg>d+ !m z int5d$ to correspond ) ! moral /ate & probation ( s9n]s :i* ,god =esaw & provid$ = at ! creation4 ,evil ?+s 9 ! univ]se are symbols ( s91 & helps to its ov]?r[4 ,see ,b[ne1 ,review ( ,h4 ,sp5c]1 #bfd1 #bfe2 ,mc,cosh1 ,*ri/4 & ,positivism1 #hb sq42 ,m>t9eau1 ,essays1 #a3ej1 & ,/udy1 #a3cea-cih2 ,port]1 ,hum4 ,intellect1 #eii2 ,miv>t1 ,lessons f ,nature1 #cff-cga2 ,pr9ceton ,rev41 #ahgh3bgb-cjc2 ,%aw1 on ,positivism4 #b4 ,defects ( ! ,teleological ,argum5t4 ,^! atta* n to ! premises b to ! conclusion s\ght to be drawn !refrom4 ,a4 ,! argum5t _c prove a p]sonal ,god4 ,! ord] & useful collocations ( ! univ]se may be only ! *ang+ ph5om5a ( an imp]sonal intellig5ce & w1 su* z pan!ism supposes4 ,! f9ality may be only imman5t f9ality4 ,!re is su* a ?+ z imman5t & unconsci\s f9ality4 ,national _s1 )\t set purpose1 con/ructs language4 ,! bee works unconsci\sly to ends4 ,/rato ( ,lampsacus reg>d$ ! _w z a va/ animal4 ,ari/otle1 ,phys41 #b3h--8,plant ! %ip-build]'s skill )9 ! timb] itself1 & y h ! mode 9 :i* nature produces40 ,"h we see a dim anticipation ( ! mod]n doctr9e ( developm5t f )9 in/ead ( creation f )\t4 ,ne&]3 8,! div9e "w goes on f )9 outw>d40 ,john ,fiske3 8,! argum5t f ! wat* has be5 sup]s$$ by ! argum5t f ! fl[]40 ,iv]a*1 ,!ism1 #ia--8,! effect ( evolution has be5 simply to transf] ! cause f a m]e ext]nal influ5ce work+ f )\t to an imman5t rational pr9ciple40 ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy1 #a3cdi1 #cej--8,!ism is 9 no way committ$ to ! doctr9e ( a ,god ext]nal to ! _w 444 nor does intellig5ce require1 9 ord] to ga9 an object1 to give x ext]nality40 ,newman ,smy?1 ,place ( ,dea?1 #fb-hj--8,! univ]se exi/s 9 "s all-p]vasive ,intellig5ce4 ,suppose we c\ld see a small heap ( brick1 scraps ( metal1 & pieces ( mort>1 gradually %ap+ !mselves into ! walls & int]ior /ructure ( a build+1 add+ ne$$ mat]ial z ! "w advanc$1 & at la/ pres5t+ 9 its completion a factory furni%$ ) v>i$ & f9ely wr\ght ma*9]y4 ,or1 a locomotive c>ry+ a process ( self-repair to comp5sate = we>1 gr[+ & increas+ 9 size1 deta*+ f itself at int]vals pieces ( brass or iron end[$ ) ! p[] ( gr[+ up /ep by /ep into o!r locomotives capable ( runn+ !mselves & ( reproduc+ new locomotives 9 _! turn40 ,s nature 9 its sep>ate p>ts may seem me*anical1 b z a :ole x is rational4 ,weismann does n 8dis[n a directive p[]10--only ?is p[] is 8beh9d ! me*anism z its f9al cause 444 x mu/ be teleological40 ,impressive z are ^! evid5ces ( intellig5ce 9 ! univ]se z a :ole1 & increas$ 9 numb] z !y are by ! new light ( evolution1 we mu/ /ill hold t nature alone _c prove t ?is intellig5ce is p]sonal4 ,hopk9s1 ,miscellanies1 #ah-cf--8,s long z !re is su* a ?+ z imp]sonal & adapt+ intellig5ce 9 ! brute creation1 we _c necess>ily inf] f un*ang+ laws a free & p]sonal ,god40 ,see ,fi%]1 ,sup]nat4 ,orig9 ( ,*ri/ianity1 #egf-egh4 ,kant %[s t ! argum5t does n prove intellig5ce ap>t f ! _w 7,critique1 #cgj74 ,we mu/ br+ m9d to ! _w1 if we w\ld f9d m9d 9 x4 ,leave out man1 & nature _c be prop]ly int]pret$3 ! intellig5ce & w 9 nature may /ill be unconsci\s4 ,b1 tak+ 9 man1 we are b\nd to get our idea ( ! intellig5ce & w 9 nature f ! highe/ type ( intellig5ce & w we "k1 & t is man's4 8,nullus 9 microcosmo spiritus1 nullus 9 macrocosmo ,deus40 8,we receive b :at we give1 ,& 9 our life alone does ,nature live40 ,! ,teleological ,argum5t !re=e ne$s to be supplem5t$ by ! ,an?ropological ,argum5t1 or ! argum5t f ! m5tal & moral con/itution ( man4 ,by itself1 x does n prove a ,creator4 ,see ,cald]wood1 ,moral ,philosophy1 #bf2 ,ritt]1 ,hi/4 ,anc4 ,philos41 bk4 #i1 *ap4 #f2 ,f\ndations ( our ,fai?1 #ch2 ,murphy1 ,sci5tific ,bases1 #bae2 ,habit & ,intellig5ce1 #b3f1 & *ap4 #bg4 ,on imman5t f9ality1 see ,janet1 ,f9al ,causes1 #cde-dae2 ,diman1 ,!i/ic ,argum5t1 #bja-bjc4 ,s9ce righte\sness belongs only to p]sonality1 ?is argum5t _c prove righte\sness 9 ,god4 ,fl9t1 ,!ism1 #ff--8,p[] & ,intellig5ce alone d n con/itute ,god1 ?\gh !y be inf9ite4 ,a be+ may h ^!1 &1 if lack+ righte\sness1 may be a devil40 ,"h aga9 we see ! ne$ ( ! ,an?ropological ,argum5t to supplem5t ?is4 ,b4 ,ev5 if ?is argum5t c\ld prove p]sonality 9 ! intellig5ce & w t orig9at$ ! ord] ( ! univ]se1 x c\ld n prove ei!r ! unity1 ! et]nity1 or ! inf9ity ( ,god2 n ! unity--= ! useful collocations ( ! univ]se might be ! result ( on5ess ( c\nsel1 in/ead ( on5ess ( ess5ce1 9 ! contriv+ intellig5ce2 n ! et]nity--= a creat$ demiurge might conceivably h design$ ! univ]se2 n ! inf9ity--s9ce all m>ks ( ord] & collocation )9 our obs]vation are simply f9ite4 ,diman ass]ts 7,!i/ic ,argum5t1 #aad7 t all ! ph5om5a ( ! univ]se mu/ be due to ! same s\rce--s9ce all alike are subject to ! same me?od ( sequ5ce1 e4 g41 gravitation--& t ! evid5ce po9ts u irresi/ibly to "s "o explanatory cause4 ,we c reg>d ?is ass]tion only z ! utt]ance ( a primitive belief 9 a fir/ cause1 n z ! conclusion ( logical demon/ration1 = we "k only an inf9itesimal "p ( ! univ]se4 ,f ! po9t ( view ( ! intuition ( an ,absolute ,reason1 h[ev]1 we c cordially ass5t to ! words ( ,f4 ,l4 ,patton3 8,:5 we consid] ,mat!w ,arnold's #8/ream ( t5d5cy1' ,sp5c]'s #8unkn[able1' ,s*op5hau]'s #8_w z w1' & ,h>tmann's elaborate def5ce ( f9ality z ! product ( unconsci\s intellig5ce1 we may well ask if ! !i/s1 ) _! belief 9 "o p]sonal ,god1 are n 9 possession ( ! only hypo!sis t c save ! language ( ^! writ]s f ! *>ge ( mean+less & idiotic rav+0 7,j\rn4 ,*ri/4 ,philos41 ,april1 #ahhc3bhc-cjg74 ,! anci5t _w1 :i* _h only ! light ( nature1 believ$ 9 _m gods4 ,william ,james1 ,w to ,believe1 #dd--8;,if !re be a div9e ,_s ( ! univ]se1 nature1 su* z we "k h]1 _c possibly be its ultimate ^w to man4 ,ei!r !re is no _s reveal$ 9 nature1 or else x is inadequately reveal$ !re2 & 7z all ! high] religions h assum$7 :at we call visible nature1 or ?is _w1 mu/ be b a veil & surface-%[ ^: full mean+ resides 9 a supplem5t>y unse51 or o!r _w40 ,b[ne1 ,!ory ( ,?\ght & ,k1 #bcd--8;,b is n intellig5ce itself ! my/]y ( my/]ies8444 ,no d\bt1 intellect is a great my/]y4444 ,b !re is a *oice 9 my/]ies4 ,"s my/]ies leave o!r ?+s cle>1 & "s leave ?+s z d>k & imp5etrable z ev]4 ,! =m] is ! case ) ! my/]y ( intellig5ce4 ,x makes possible ! compreh5sion ( ev]y?+ b itself40 #c4 ,! value ( ! ,teleological ,argum5t is simply ?is1--x proves f c]ta9 useful collocations & in/ances ( ord] :i* h cle>ly _h a beg9n+1 or 9 o!r words1 f ! pres5t h>mony ( ! univ]se1 t !re exi/s an intellig5ce & w adequate to its contrivance4 ,b :e!r ?is intellig5ce & w is p]sonal or imp]sonal1 creator or only fa%ion]1 "o or _m1 f9ite or inf9ite1 et]nal or ow+ its be+ to ano!r1 necess>y or free1 ?is argum5t _c assure u4 ,9 x1 h[ev]1 we take a /ep =w>d4 ,! causative p[] :i* we h prov$ by ! ,cosmological ,argum5t has n[ become an intellig5t & volunt>y p[]4 ,john ,/u>t ,mill1 ,?ree ,essays on ,!ism1 #afh-agj--8;,9 ! pres5t /ate ( our k1 ! adaptations 9 nature af=d a l>ge balance ( probability 9 favor ( causation by intellig5ce40 ,ladd holds t1 :5ev] "o be+ acts ^u its l1 ea* be+ und]goes *anges ( /ate t belong to its own nature "u ! circum/ances4 ,action ( "o body on ano!r nev] consi/s 9 transf]r+ ! /ate ( "o be+ to ano!r4 ,!re=e !re is no m difficulty 9 be+s t are unlike act+ on "o ano!r ?an 9 be+s t are l4 ,we d n transf] ideas to o!r m9ds1--we only r\se !m to develop _! own ideas4 ,s =ce also is positively n transf]able4 ,b[ne1 ,philos4 ( ,!ism1 #di1 beg9s ) 8! conception ( ?+s int]act+ accord+ to law & =m+ an intelligible sy/em4 ,su* a sy/em _c be con/ru$ by ?\ght )\t ! assumption ( a unit>y be+ :i* is ! fundam5tal reality ( ! sy/em4 #ec--,no passage ( influ5ces or =ces w avail to bridge ! gulf1 s long z ! ?+s are reg>d$ z indep5d5t4 #ef--,! sy/em itself _c expla9 ?is int]action1 = ! sy/em is only ! memb]s ( x4 ,!re mu/ be "s be+ 9 !m :i* is _! reality1 & ( :i* !y are 9 "s s5se phases or manife/ations4 ,9 o!r words1 !re mu/ be a basal monism40 ,all ?is is sub/antially ! view ( ,lotze1 ( ^: philosophy see criticism 9 ,/hl9's ,kant1 ,lotze1 & ,rits*l1 #aaf-aef1 & especially #abc4 ,falck5b]g1 ,ges*4 d] neu]5 ,philosophie1 #ded1 %[s z to ,lotze's view t 8 assumption ( moni/ic unity & cont9uity does n expla9 h[ *ange ( condition 9 "o ?+ %\ld1 z equalization or comp5sation1 foll[ *ange ( condition 9 ano!r ?+4 ,lotze expla9s ?is actuality by ! e?ical conception ( an all-embrac+ ,p]son4 ,on ! :ole argum5t1 see ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahdi3fcd2 ,murphy1 ,sci4 ,bases1 #baf2 ,fl9t1 ,!ism1 #aca-baj2 ,pfleid]]1 ,die ,religion1 #a3afd-agd2 ,w4 ,r4 ,b5$ict1 on ,!ism & ,evolution1 9 ,&ov] ,rev41 #ahhf3cjg-cej1 #fjg-fbb4 ,,iii4 ,! ,an?ropological ,argum5t1 or ,argum5t f ,man's ,m5tal & ,moral ,nature4 ,?is is an argum5t f ! m5tal & moral condition ( man to ! exi/5ce ( an ,au?or1 ,lawgiv]1 & ,end4 ,x is sometimes call$ ! ,moral ,argum5t4 ,! common title 8,moral ,argum5t0 is mu* too n>r[1 = x seems to take acc\nt only ( consci5ce 9 man1 :]eas ! argum5t :i* ?is title s imp]fectly designates really proce$s f man's intellectual & emotional1 z well z f 8 moral1 nature4 ,9 *oos+ ! designation we h adopt$1 we desire1 moreov]1 to rescue f ! m]e physici/ ! t]m 8,an?ropology0--a t]m to :i* he has atta*$ altoge!r too limit$ a signification1 & :i*1 9 8 use ( x1 implies t man is a m]e animal1--to him ,an?ropology is simply ! /udy ( la bte huma9e4 ,an?ropology means1 n simply ! sci5ce ( man's physical nature1 orig91 & relations1 b also ! sci5ce :i* treats ( 8 high] spiritual be+4 ,h5ce1 9 ,!ology1 ! t]m ,an?ropology designates t division ( ! subject :i* treats ( man's spiritual nature & end[m5ts1 8 orig9al /ate & 8 subsequ5t apo/asy4 ,z an argum5t1 !re=e1 f man's m5tal & moral nature1 we c ) p]fect propriety call ! pres5t argum5t ! ,an?ropological ,argum5t4 ,! argum5t is a complex "o1 & may be divid$ into ?ree p>ts4 #a4 ,man's intellectual & moral nature mu/ h _h = its au?or an intellectual & moral ,be+4 ,! elem5ts ( ! pro( are z foll[s3--7a7 ,man1 z an intellectual & moral be+1 has _h a beg9n+ ^u ! planet4 7b7 ,mat]ial & unconsci\s =ces d n af=d a suffici5t cause = man's reason1 consci5ce1 & free w4 7c7 ,man1 z an effect1 c be ref]r$ only to a cause possess+ self-consci\sness & a moral nature1 9 o!r words1 p]sonality4 ,?is argum5t is is "p an application to man ( ! pr9ciples ( bo? ! ,cosmological & ! ,teleological ,argum5ts4 ,fl9t1 ,!ism1 #gd--8;,al?\gh causality does n involve design1 nor design goodness1 yet design involves causality1 & goodness bo? causality & design40 ,jacobi3 8,nature conceals ,god2 man reveals him40 ,man is an effect4 ,! hi/ory ( ! geologic ages proves t man has n always exi/$1 & ev5 if ! l[] creatures 7 8 prog5itors1 8 intellect & fre$om are n et]nal a p>te ante4 ,we consid] man1 n z a physical1 b z a spiritual1 be+4 ,?ompson1 ,*ri/ian ,!ism1 #ge--8;,e true cause mu/ be suffici5t to acc\nt = ! effect40 ,locke1 ,essay1 book #d1 *ap4 #aj--8;,cogitable exi/5ce _c be produc$ out ( incogitable40 ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy ( ,religion1 #a3beh sq4 ,ev5 if man _h always exi/$1 h[ev]1 we %\ld n ne$ to ab&on ! argum5t4 ,we might />t1 n f beg9n+ ( exi/5ce1 b f beg9n+ ( ph5om5a4 ,i might see ,god 9 ! _w1 j z ,i see ?\ght1 feel+1 w1 9 my fell[ m54 ,full]ton1 ,pla9 ,argum5t = ,god3 ,i d n inf] y1 z cause ( ! exi/5ce ( y\r body3 ,i recognize y z pres5t & work+ ?r\gh y\r body4 ,its *anges ( ge/ure & spee* reveal a p]sonality beh9d !m4 ,s ,i d n ne$ to argue back to a ,be+ :o once caus$ nature & hi/ory2 ,i recognize a pres5t ,be+1 ex]cis+ wisdom & p[]1 by signs su* z reveal p]sonality 9 man4 ,nature is itself ! ,wat*mak] manife/+ himself 9 ! v process ( mak+ ! wat*4 ,?is is ! mean+ ( ! noble ,epilogue to ,rob]t ,br[n+'s ,dramatis ,p]son1 #beb--8,t "o ,face1 f> f vani%1 r gr[s1 ,or decomposes b to recompose1 ,become my univ]se t feels & kn[s40 8,t ,face10 said ,mr4 ,br[n+ to ,mrs4 ,orr1 8,t ,face is ! face ( ,*ri/2 t is h[ ,i feel him40 ,nature is an expression ( ! m9d & w ( ,*ri/1 z my face is an expression ( my m9d & w4 ,b 9 bo? cases1 beh9d & above ! face is a p]sonality1 ( :i* ! face is b ! p>tial & tempor>y expression4 ,b[ne1 ,philos4 ,!ism1 #ajd1 #ajg--8,my fell[ be+s act z if !y _h ?\ght1 feel+1 & w4 ,s nature looks z if ?\ght1 feel+1 & w 7 beh9d x4 ,if we d5y m9d 9 nature1 we mu/ d5y m9d 9 man4 ,if !re be no controll+ m9d 9 nature1 moreov]1 !re c be none 9 man1 = if ! basal p[] is bl9d & necess>y1 !n all t dep5ds ^u x is necessitat$ also40 ,le,conte1 9 ,royce's ,conception ( ,god1 #dd--8,!re is only "o place 9 ! _w :]e we c get beh9d physical ph5om5a1 beh9d ! veil ( matt]1 namely1 9 our own bra91 & we f9d !re a self1 a p]son4 ,is x n reasonable t1 if we c\ld get beh9d ! veil ( nature1 we %\ld f9d ! same1 t is1 a ,p]son8 ,b if s1 we mu/ conclude1 an inf9ite ,p]son1 & !re=e ! only complete ,p]sonality t exi/s4 ,p]fect p]sonality is n only self-consci\s1 b self-exi/5t4 ,!y are only imp]fect images1 &1 z x 71 sep>at$ fragm5ts1 ( ! inf9ite ,p]sonality ( ,god40 ,p]sonality self-consci\sness self-det]m9ation 9 view ( moral ends4 ,! brute has intellig5ce & w1 b has nei!r self-consci\sness1 consci5ce1 nor free-w4 ,see ,julius ,mll]1 ,doctr9e ( ,s91 #a3gf sq4 ,diman1 ,!i/ic ,argum5t1 #ia1 #bea--8,suppose #8! intuitions ( ! moral faculty are ! sl[ly organiz$ results ( exp]i5ce receiv$ f ! race'2 /ill1 hav+ f\nd t ! univ]se af=ds evid5ce ( a supremely intellig5t cause1 we may believe t man's moral nature af=ds ! highe/ illu/ration ( its mode ( work+02 #ceh--8,%all we expla9 ! l[] =ms ( w by ! high]1 or ! high] by ! l[]80 #b4 ,man's moral nature proves ! exi/5ce ( a holy ,lawgiv] & ,judge4 ,! elem5ts ( ! pro( are3--7a7 ,consci5ce recognizes ! exi/5ce ( a moral law :i* has supreme au?ority4 7b7 ,kn[n violations ( ?is moral law are foll[$ by feel+s ( ill-des]t & fe>s ( judgm5t4 7c7 ,?is moral law1 s9ce x is n self-impos$1 & ^! ?reats ( judgm5t1 s9ce !y are n self-execut+1 respectively argue ! exi/5ce ( a holy w t has impos$ ! law1 & ( a punitive p[] t w execute ! ?reats ( ! moral nature4 ,see ,bi%op ,butl]'s ,s]mons on ,human ,nature1 9 ,works1 ,bohn's ed41 #che-dad4 ,butl]'s great discov]y 0 t ( ! supremacy ( consci5ce 9 ! moral con/itution ( man3 8,_h x /r5g? z x has "r1 _h x p[] z x has manife/ au?ority1 x w\ld absolutely gov]n ! _w40 ,consci5ce ! moral judici>y ( ! s\l--n law1 nor %]iff1 b judge2 see "u ,an?ropology4 ,diman1 ,!i/ic ,argum5t1 #bea--8;,consci5ce does n lay d[n a law2 x w>ns u ( ! exi/5ce ( a law2 & n only ( a law1 b ( a purpose--n our own1 b ! purpose ( ano!r1 :i* x is our mission to realize40 ,see ,murphy1 ,sci5tific ,bases ( ,fai?1 #bah sq4 ,x proves p]sonality 9 ! ,lawgiv]1 because its utt]ances are n ab/ract1 l ^? ( reason1 b are 9 ! nature ( comm&2 !y are n 9 ! indicative1 b 9 ! imp]ative1 mood2 x says1 8?\ %alt0 & 8?\ %alt n40 ,?is argues w4 ,hutton1 ,essays1 #a3aa--8;,consci5ce is an ideal ,moses1 & ?und]s f an invisible ,s9ai02 8! ,a!i/ reg>ds consci5ce n z a skylight1 op5$ to let 9 ^u human nature an inf9ite dawn f above1 b z a poli%$ ar* or dome1 complet+ & reflect+ ! :ole edifice b5ea?40 ,b consci5ce _c be ! m]e reflection & expression ( nature1 = x represses & condemns nature4 ,tullo*1 ,!ism3 8,consci5ce1 l ! magnetic ne$le1 indicates ! exi/5ce ( an unkn[n ,p[] :i* f af> controls its vibrations & at ^: pres5ce x trembles40 ,n]o sp5ds nights ( t]ror 9 w&]+ ?r\gh ! halls ( 8 ,gold5 ,h\se4 ,kant holds t fai? 9 duty requires fai? 9 a ,god :o w def5d & rew>d duty--see ,critique ( ,pure ,reason1 #cei-chg4 ,see also ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #ebd4 ,kant1 9 8 ,metaphysic ( ,e?ics1 repres5ts ! action ( consci5ce z l 8conduct+ a case be=e a c\rt10 & he adds3 8,n[ t he :o is accus$ be=e 8 consci5ce %\ld be figur$ to be j ! same p]son z 8 judge1 is an absurd repres5tation ( a tribunal2 s9ce1 9 su* an ev5t1 ! accus] w\ld always lose 8 suit4 ,consci5ce mu/ !re=e repres5t to itself always "s o!r ?an itself z ,judge1 unless x is to arrive at a contradiction ) itself40 ,see also 8 ,critique ( ! ,practical ,reason1 ,w]ke1 #h3bad--8;,duty1 ?\ sublime & mighty "n1 t ha/ 9 !e no?+ to attract or w91 b *all5ge/ submission2 & yet do/ ?reat5 no?+ to sway ! w by t :i* may ar\se natural t]ror or av]sion1 b m]ely holde/ =? a ,law2 a ,law :i* ( itself f9ds entrance into ! m9d1 & ev5 :ile we disobey1 aga9/ our w compels our rev]5ce1 a ,law 9 pres5ce ( :i* all incl9ations gr[ dumb1 ev5 :ile !y secretly rebel2 :at orig9 is !re wor?y ( !e8 ,:]e c we f9d ! root ( ?y noble desc5t1 :i* pr\dly rejects all k9%ip ) ! incl9ations80 ,ar*bi%op ,temple answ]s1 9 8 ,bampton ,lectures1 #eh1 #ei1 8,?is et]nal ,law is ! ,et]nal himself1 ! almighty ,god40 ,rob]t ,br[n+3 8,! s5se )9 me t ,i owe a debt ,assures me--,some:]e mu/ be ,somebody1 ,ready to take 8 due4 ,all comes to ?is3 ,:]e due is1 !re acceptance foll[s3 f9d ,him :o accepts ! due40 ,salt]1 ,e?ical ,religion1 quot$ 9 ,pfleid]]'s article on ,religionless ,morality1 ,am4 ,j\r4 ,!ol41 #c3bcg--8,! e>? & ! />s d n create ! law ( gravitation :i* !y obey2 no m does man1 or ! unit$ ho/s ( rational be+s 9 ! univ]se1 create ! law ( duty40 ,! w express$ 9 ! moral imp]ative is sup]ior to ours1 = o!rwise x w\ld issue no comm&s4 ,yet x is "o ) ours z ! life ( an organism is "o ) ! life ( its memb]s4 ,!onomy is n het]onomy b ! highe/ autonomy1 ! gu>antee ( our p]sonal fre$om aga9/ all s]vitude ( man4 ,s5eca3 8,deo p>]e lib]tas e/40 ,knight1 ,essays 9 ,philosophy1 #bgb--8;,9 consci5ce we see an #8alt] ego'1 9 u yet n ( u1 ano!r ,p]sonality beh9d our own40 ,m>t9eau1 ,types1 #b3aje--8,ov] a p]son only a p]son c h au?ority4444 ,a solit>y be+1 ) no o!r s5ti5t nature 9 ! univ]se1 w\ld feel no duty02 ,/udy1 #a3bf--8;,z ,p]ception gives u ,w 9 ! %ape ( ,causality ov] aga9/ u 9 ! ,non-,ego1 s ,consci5ce gives u ,w 9 ! %ape ( ,au?ority ov] aga9/ u 9 ! ,non-,ego4444 #b3g--,we _c d$uce ! ph5om5a ( "* f an ag5t :o has none40 ,hutton1 ,essays1 #a3da1 #db--8,:5 we disobey consci5ce1 ! ,p[] :i* has !re9 ceas$ to move u has retir$ only to obs]ve--to keep wat* ov] u z we m\ld ourselves40 ,c>d9al ,newman1 ,apologia1 #cgg--8,7 x n = ! voice speak+ s cle>ly 9 my consci5ce & my he>t1 ,i %\ld be an a!i/1 or a pan!i/1 or a poly!i/1 :5 ,i look$ into ! _w40 #c4 ,man's emotional & volunt>y nature proves ! exi/5ce ( a ,be+ :o c furni% 9 himself a satisfy+ object ( human affection & an end :i* w call =? man's highe/ activities & ensure 8 highe/ progress4 ,only a ,be+ ( p[]1 wisdom1 hol9ess1 & goodness1 & all ^! indef9itely great] ?an any t we "k ^u ! e>?1 c meet ?is dem& ( ! human s\l4 ,su* a ,be+ mu/ exi/4 ,o!rwise man's greate/ ne$ w\ld be unsuppli$1 & belief 9 a lie be m productive ( virtue ?an belief 9 ! tru?4 ,feu]ba* calls ,god 8! ,brock5-%ad[ ( man himself02 8consci\sness ( ,god self-consci\sness02 8religion is a dream ( ! human s\l02 8all !ology is an?ropology02 8man made ,god 9 8 own image40 ,b consci5ce %[s t man does n recognize 9 ,god simply 8 l1 b also 8 opposite4 ,n z ,galton3 8,piety consci5ce in/ability40 ,! f9e/ m9ds are ( ! lean+ type2 see ,murphy1 ,sci5tific ,bases1 #cgj2 ,augu/9e1 ,confessions1 #a3a--8,?\ ha/ made u = ?yself1 & our he>t is re/less till x f9ds re/ 9 !e40 ,on ,john ,/u>t ,mill--8a m9d t c\ld n f9d ,god1 & a he>t t c\ld n d )\t him0--see 8 ,autobiography1 & ,br[ne1 9 ,/riv+s = ! ,fai? 7,*ri/4 ,ev4 ,socy471 #bei-bhg4 ,comte1 9 8 lat] days1 con/ruct$ an object ( wor%ip 9 ,univ]sal ,humanity1 & inv5t$ a ritual :i* ,huxley calls 8,ca?olicism m9us ,*ri/ianity40 ,see also ,tyndall1 ,belfa/ ,address3 8,did ,i n believe1 said a great man to me once1 t an ,intellig5ce exi/s at ! he>t ( ?+s1 my life on e>? w\ld be intol]able40 ,m>t9eau1 ,types ( ,e?ical ,!ory1 #a3eje1ejf4 ,! la/ l9e ( ,s*ill]'s ,pilgrim reads3 8,und das ,dort i/ niemals hi]40 ,! f9ite nev] satisfies4 ,t5nyson1 ,two ,voices3 8',tis life1 :]e( our n]ves are scant1 ,oh life1 n dea?1 = :i* we pant2 ,m life1 & full]1 t ,i want40 ,se?1 ,e?ical ,pr9ciples1 #dai--8;,a moral univ]se1 an absolute moral ,be+1 is ! indisp5sable environm5t ( ! e?ical life1 )\t :i* x _c atta9 to its p]fect gr[?4444 ,!re is a moral ,god1 or ?is is no univ]se40 ,james1 ,w to ,believe1 #aaf--8;,a ,god is ! mo/ adequate possible object = m9ds fram$ l our own to conceive z ly+ at ! root ( ! univ]se4 ,any?+ %ort ( ,god is n a rational object1 any?+ m ?an ,god is n possible1 if man ne$s an object ( k1 feel+1 & w40 ,romanes1 ,?\ghts on ,religion1 #da--8,to speak ( ! ,religion ( ! ,unkn[able1 ! ,religion ( ,cosmism1 ! ,religion ( ,humanity1 :]e ! p]sonality ( ! ,fir/ ,cause is n recogniz$1 is z unmean+ z x w\ld be to speak ( ! love ( a triangle or ! rationality ( ! equator40 ,x 0 said ( ,comte's sy/em t1 8! w9e ( ! real pres5ce be+ p\r$ out1 we are ask$ to adore ! empty cup40 8,we want an object ( devotion1 & ,comte pres5ts u ) a look+-glass0 7,m>t9eau74 ,huxley said he w\ld z soon adore a wild]ness ( apes z ! ,positivi/'s rationaliz$ conception ( humanity4 ,x is only ! ideal 9 humanity1 ! div9e elem5t 9 humanity t c be wor%ip$4 ,& :5 we once conceive ( ?is1 we _c be satisfi$ until we f9d x some:]e realiz$1 z 9 ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,upton1 ,hibb]t ,lectures1 #bfe-bgb--;,huxley believes t ,evolution is 8a mat]ializ$ logical process02 t no?+ endures save ! fl[ ( en]gy & 8! rational ord] :i* p]vades x40 ,9 ! e>li] "p ( ?is process1 nature1 !re is no morality or b5evol5ce4 ,b ! process ends by produc+ man1 :o c make progress only by wag+ moral w> aga9/ ! natural =ces :i* impel him4 ,he mu/ be b5evol5t & j4 ,%all we n say1 9 spite ( ,mr4 ,huxley1 t ?is %[s :at ! nature ( ! sy/em is1 & t !re mu/ be a b5evol5t & j ,be+ :o orda9$ x8 ,m>t9eau1 ,seat ( ,au?ority1 #fc-fh--8,?\gh ! au?ority ( ! high] inc5tive is self-kn[n1 x _c be self-creat$2 = :ile x is 9 me1 x is above me4444 ,?is au?ority to :i* consci5ce introduces me1 ?\gh em]g+ 9 consci\sness1 is yet objective to u all1 & is necess>ily ref]r$ to ! nature ( ?+s1 irrespective ( ! accid5ts ( our m5tal con/itution4 ,x is n dep5d5t on u1 b indep5d5t4 ,all m9ds born into ! univ]se are u%]$ into ! pres5ce ( a real righte\sness1 z surely z into a sc5e ( actual space4 ,p]ception reveals ano!r ?an ourselves2 consci5ce reveals a high] ?an ourselves40 ,we mu/ freely grant1 h[ev]1 t ?is argum5t f man's aspirations has weight only ^u ! supposition t a wise1 tru?ful1 holy1 & b5evol5t ,god exi/s1 :o has s con/itut$ our m9ds t _! ?9k+ & _! affections correspond to tru? & to himself4 ,an evil be+ might h s con/itut$ u t all logic w\ld lead u into error4 ,! argum5t is !re=e ! developm5t & expression ( our intuitive idea ( ,god4 ,lu?>dt1 ,fundam5tal ,tru?s3 8,nature is l a writt5 docum5t conta9+ only consonants4 ,x is we :o mu/ furni% ! v[els t %all deciph] x4 ,unless we br+ ) u ! idea ( ,god1 we %all f9d nature b dumb40 ,see also ,pfleid]]1 ,die ,religion1 #a3agd4 ,a4 ,! defects ( ! ,an?ropological ,argum5t are3 7a7 ,x _c prove a creator ( ! mat]ial univ]se4 7b7 ,x _c prove ! inf9ity ( ,god1 s9ce man f :om we argue is f9ite4 7c7 ,x _c prove ! m]cy ( ,god4 ,b1 ,b4 ,! value ( ! ,argum5t is1 t x assures u ( ! exi/5ce ( a p]sonal ,be+1 :o rules u 9 righte\sness1 & :o is ! prop] object ( supreme affection & s]vice4 ,b :e!r ?is ,be+ is ! orig9al creator ( all ?+s1 or m]ely ! au?or ( our own exi/5ce1 :e!r he is inf9ite or f9ite1 :e!r he is a ,be+ ( simple righte\sness or also ( m]cy1 ?is argum5t _c assure u4 ,among ! argum5ts = ! exi/5ce ( ,god1 h[ev]1 we assign to ?is ! *ief place1 s9ce x adds to ! ideas ( causative p[] 7:i* we d]iv$ f ! ,cosmological ,argum5t7 & ( contriv+ intellig5ce 7:i* we d]iv$ f ! ,teleological ,argum5t71 ! f> wid] ideas ( p]sonality & righte\s lord%ip4 ,sir ,wm4 ,hamilton1 ,works ( ,reid1 #b3igd1 note ,u2 ,lect4 on ,metaph41 #a3cc--8,! only valid argum5ts = ! exi/5ce ( ,god & = ! immortality ( ! s\l re/ ^u ! gr\nd ( man's moral nature02 8!ology is :olly dep5d5t ^u psy*ology1 = ) ! pro( ( ! moral nature ( man /&s or falls ! pro( ( ! exi/5ce ( a ,deity40 ,b ,diman1 ,!i/ic ,argum5t1 #bdd1 v prop]ly objects to mak+ ?is argum5t f ! nature ( man ! sole pro( ( ,deity3 8,x %\ld be r us$ to %[ ! attributes ( ! ,be+ ^: exi/5ce has be5 already prov$ f o!r s\rces02 8h5ce ! ,an?ropological ,argum5t is z dep5d5t ^u ! ,cosmological & ,teleological ,argum5ts z !y are ^u x40 ,yet ! ,an?ropological ,argum5t is ne$$ to supplem5t ! conclusions ( ! two o!rs4 ,^? :o1 l ,h]b]t ,sp5c]1 recognize an inf9ite & absolute ,be+1 ,p[] & ,cause1 may yet fail to recognize ?is be+ z spiritual & p]sonal1 simply because !y d n recognize !mselves z spiritual & p]sonal be+s1 t is1 d n recognize reason1 consci5ce & free-w 9 man4 ,agno/icism 9 philosophy involves agno/icism 9 religion4 ,r4 ,k4 ,eccles3 8,all ! mo/ advanc$ languages capitalize ! ^w #8,god1' & ! ^w #8,i4' 0 ,see ,fl9t1 ,!ism1 #fh2 ,mill1 ,criticism ( ,hamilton1 #b3bff2 ,dove1 ,logic ( ,*ri/ian ,fai?1 #baa-bcf1 #bfa-bii2 ,m>t9eau1 ,types1 ,introd41 #c2 ,cooke1 ,religion & ,*emi/ry3 8,god is love2 b nature c\ld n prove x1 & ! ,lamb 0 sla9 f ! f\ndation ( ! _w 9 ord] to atte/ x40 ,ev]y?+ 9 philosophy dep5ds on :]e we beg91 :e!r ) nature or ) self1 :e!r ) ! necess>y or ) ! free4 ,9 "o s5se1 !re=e1 we %\ld 9 practice beg9 ) ! ,an?ropological ,argum5t1 & !n use ! ,cosmological & ,teleological ,argum5ts z w>rant+ ! application to nature ( ! conclusions :i* we h drawn f man4 ,z ,god /&s ov] aga9/ man 9 ,consci5ce1 & says to him3 8,?\02 s man /&s ov] aga9/ ,god 9 ,nature1 & may say to him3 8,?\40 ,mul=d1 ,republic ( ,god1 #bh--8;,z ! p]sonality ( man has its f\ndation 9 ! p]sonality ( ,god1 s ! realization by man ( 8 own p]sonality always br+s man ne>] to ,god40 ,rob]t ,br[n+3 8,quo? a "y ,sadducee3 #8,read] ( _m rolls1 ,is x s c]ta9 we ,h1 z !y tell u1 s\ls8' #8,son1 !re is no reply6' ,! ,rabbi bit 8 be>d3 #8,c]ta91 a s\l h ,i--,we may h none1' he sne]$4 ,?us ,k>%ook1 ! ,hiram's ,hamm]1 ,! ,"r-h& ,temple-column1 ,taught babes 9 grace _! gramm>1 ,& /ruck ! simple1 solemn40 ,x is v common at ?is place to treat ( :at are call$ ! ,hi/orical & ! ,biblical ,argum5ts = ! exi/5ce ( ,god--! =m] argu+1 f ! unity ( hi/ory1 ! latt] argu+1 f ! unity ( ! ,bible1 t ?is unity mu/ 9 ea* case h = its cause & explanation ! exi/5ce ( ,god4 ,x is a suffici5t reason = n discuss+ ^! argum5ts1 t1 )\t a previ\s belief 9 ! exi/5ce ( ,god1 no "o w see unity ei!r 9 hi/ory or 9 ! ,bible4 ,turn]1 ! pa9t]1 exhibit$ a picture :i* seem$ all mi/ & cl\d until he put a dab ( sc>let into x4 ,t gave ! true po9t ( view1 & all ! re/ became intelligible4 ,s ,*ri/'s com+ & ,*ri/'s blood make intelligible bo? ! ,scriptures & human hi/ory4 ,he c>ries 9 8 girdle ! key to all my/]ies4 ,s*op5hau]1 kn[+ no ,*ri/1 admitt$ no philosophy ( hi/ory4 ,he reg>d$ hi/ory z ! m]e =tuit\s play ( individual caprice4 ,pascal3 8,jesus ,*ri/ is ! c5tre ( ev]y?+1 & ! object ( ev]y?+1 & he t does n "k him kn[s no?+ ( nature1 & no?+ ( himself40 ,,iv4 ,! ,ontological ,argum5t1 or ,argum5t f our ,ab/ract & ,necess>y ,ideas4 ,?is argum5t inf]s ! exi/5ce ( ,god f ! ab/ract & necess>y ideas ( ! human m9d4 ,x has ?ree =ms3 #a4 ,t ( ,samuel ,cl>ke4 ,space & "t are attributes ( sub/ance or be+4 ,b space & "t are respectively inf9ite & et]nal4 ,!re mu/ !re=e be an inf9ite & et]nal sub/ance or ,be+ to :om ^! attributes belong4 ,gillespie /ates ! argum5t some:at diff]5tly4 ,space & "t are modes ( exi/5ce4 ,b space & "t are respectively inf9ite & et]nal4 ,!re mu/ !re=e be an inf9ite & et]nal ,be+ :o subsi/s 9 ^! modes4 ,b we reply3 ,space & "t are nei!r attributes ( sub/ance nor modes ( exi/5ce4 ,! argum5t1 if valid1 w\ld prove t ,god is n m9d b matt]1 = t c\ld n be m9d1 b only matt]1 ( :i* space & "t 7 ei!r attributes or modes4 ,! ,ontological ,argum5t is frequ5tly call$ ! a priori argum5t1 t is1 ! argum5t f t :i* is logically prior1 or e>li] ?an exp]i5ce1 viz41 our intuitive ideas4 ,all ! =ms ( ! ,ontological ,argum5t are 9 ?is s5se a priori4 ,space & "t are a priori ideas4 ,see ,samuel ,cl>ke1 ,works1 #b3eba2 ,gillespie1 ,necess>y ,exi/5ce ( ,god4 ,p] contra1 see ,kant1 ,critique ( ,pure ,reason1 #cfd3 ,cald]wood1 ,moral ,philosophy1 #bbf--8,to beg91 z ,cl>ke did1 ) ! proposition t #8some?+ has exi/$ f et]nity1' is virtually to propose an argum5t aft] hav+ assum$ :at is to be prov$4 ,gillespie's =m ( ! a priori argum5t1 />t+ ) ! proposition #8inf9ity ( ext5sion is necess>ily exi/+1' is liable to ! same objection1 ) ! additional disadvantage ( attribut+ a prop]ty ( matt] to ! ,deity40 ,h4 ,b4 ,smi? says t ,br\gham misrepres5t$ ,cl>ke3 8,cl>ke's argum5t is 9 8 six? proposition1 & supposes ! exi/5ce prov$ 9 :at goes be=e4 ,he aims "h to e/abli% ! inf9itude & omnipres5ce ( ?is ,fir/ ,be+4 ,he does n prove exi/5ce f imm5sity40 ,b we reply1 nei!r c he prove ! inf9ity ( ,god f ! imm5sity ( space4 ,space & "t are nei!r sub/ances nor attributes1 b are r relations2 see ,cald]wood1 ,philos4 ( ,inf9ite1 #cca-cce2 ,cock]1 ,!i/ic ,conception ( ! ,_w1 #ff-if4 ,! doctr9e t space & "t are attributes or modes ( ,god's exi/5ce t5ds to mat]iali/ic pan!ism l t ( ,sp9oza1 :o held t 8! "o & simple sub/ance0 7sub/antia una et unica7 is kn[n to u ?r\gh ! two attributes ( ?\ght & ext5sion2 m9d ,god 9 ! mode ( ?\ght2 matt] ,god 9 ! mode ( ext5sion4 ,dove1 ,logic ( ! ,*ri/ian ,fai?1 #abg1 says well t an ext5d$ ,god is a mat]ial ,god2 8space & "t are attributes nei!r ( matt] nor m9d02 8we mu/ c>ry ! moral idea into ! natural _w1 n ! natural idea into ! moral _w40 ,see also1 ,blunt1 ,diction>y ,doct4 & ,hi/4 ,!ol41 #gdj2 ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #efg4 ,h4 ,m4 ,/anley1 on ,space & ,sci5ce1 9 ,philos4 ,rev41 ,nov4 #ahih3fae--8,space is n full ( ?+s1 b ?+s are spaceful4444 ,space is a =m ( dynamic appe>ance40 ,pr(4 ,c4 ,a4 ,/rong3 8,! _w compos$ ( consci\sness & o!r exi/5ces is n 9 space1 ?\gh x may be 9 some?+ ( :i* space is ! symbol40 #b4 ,t ( ,desc>tes4 ,we h ! idea ( an inf9ite & p]fect ,be+4 ,?is idea _c be d]iv$ f imp]fect & f9ite ?+s4 ,!re mu/ !re=e be an inf9ite & p]fect ,be+ :o is its cause4 ,b we reply t ?is argum5t conf\nds ! idea ( ! inf9ite ) an inf9ite idea4 ,man's idea ( ! inf9ite is n inf9ite b f9ite1 & f a f9ite effect we _c argue an inf9ite cause4 ,?is =m ( ! ,ontological ,argum5t1 :ile x is a priori1 z bas$ ^u a necess>y idea ( ! human m9d1 is1 unlike ! o!r =ms ( ! same argum5t1 a po/]iori1 z argu+ f ?is idea1 z an effect1 to ! exi/5ce ( a ,be+ :o is its cause4 ,a po/]iori argum5t f t :i* is lat] to t :i* is e>li]1 t is1 f effect to cause4 ,! ,cosmological1 ,teleological1 & ,an?ropological ,argum5ts are argum5ts a po/]iori4 ,( ?is sort is ! argum5t ( ,desc>tes2 see ,desc>tes1 ,m$itation #c3 8,hc idea qu 9 nobis e/ requirit ,deum pro causa2 ,deusque pro9de exi/it40 ,! idea 9 m5's m9ds is ! impression ( ! workman's "n /amp$ indelibly on 8 "w--! %ad[ ca/ ^u ! human s\l by t unse5 ,"o ( ^: be+ & pres5ce x dimly in=ms u4 ,blunt1 ,dict4 ( ,!ol41 #gci2 ,saisset1 ,pan!ism1 #a3ed--8;,desc>tes sets out f a fact ( consci\sness1 :ile ,anselm sets out f an ab/ract conception02 8,desc>tes's argum5t might be consid]$ a bran* ( ! ,an?ropological or ,moral ,argum5t1 b = ! fact t ?is la/ proce$s f man's con/itution r ?an f 8 ab/ract ideas40 ,see ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahdi3fcg4 #c4 ,t ( ,anselm4 ,we h ! idea ( an absolutely p]fect ,be+4 ,b exi/5ce is an attribute ( p]fection4 ,an absolutely p]fect ,be+ mu/ !re=e exi/4 ,b we reply t ?is argum5t conf\nds ideal exi/5ce ) real exi/5ce4 ,our ideas are n ! measure ( ext]nal reality4 ,anselm1 ,proslogion1 #b--8;,id1 quo majus cogit>i nequit1 non pote/ esse 9 intellectu solo40 ,see translation ( ! ,proslogion1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahea3ebi1 #fii2 ,kant1 ,critique1 #cfh4 ,! argum5ts ( ,desc>tes & ,anselm1 ) ,kant's reply1 are giv5 9 _! orig9al =m by ,h>ris1 9 ,j\rn4 ,spec4 ,philos41 #ae3dbj-dbh4 ,! major premise "h is n t all p]fect ideas imply ! exi/5ce ( ! object :i* !y repres5t1 = !n1 z ,kant objects1 ,i might argue f my p]fect idea ( a #ajj bill t ,i actually possess$ ! same1 :i* w\ld be f> f ! fact4 ,s ,i h a p]fect idea ( a p]fectly evil be+1 ( a c5taur1 ( no?+1--b x does n foll[ t ! evil be+1 t ! c5taur1 t no?+1 exi/s4 ,! argum5t is r f ! idea ( absolute & p]fect ,be+--( 8t1 no great] ?an :i* c be conceiv$40 ,!re c be b "o su* be+1 & !re c be b "o su* idea4 ,yet1 ev5 ?us und]/ood1 we _c argue f ! idea to ! actual exi/5ce ( su* a be+4 ,case1 ,physical ,realism1 #agc--8;,god is n an idea1 & consequ5tly _c be inf]r$ f m]e ideas40 ,b[ne1 ,philos4 ,!ism1 #dc--,! ,ontological ,argum5t 8only po9ts out t ! idea ( ! p]fect mu/ include ! idea ( exi/5ce2 b !re is no?+ to %[ t ! self-consi/5t idea repres5ts an objective reality40 ,i c imag9e ! ,sea-s]p5t1 ! ,j9n ( ! ,?\s& & ,"o ,nights1 8,! ,an?ropophagi1 & m5 ^: heads ,d gr[ b5ea? _! %\ld]s40 ,! w+$ horse ( ,uhl& possess$ e possible virtue1 & only "o fault1--x 0 dead4 ,if e p]fect idea impli$ ! reality ( its object1 !re might be horses ) t5 legs1 & trees ) roots 9 ! air4 8,anselm's argum5t implies10 says ,fi%]1 9 ,j\rn4 ,*ri/4 ,philos41 ,jan4 #ahhc3aad1 8t exi/5ce 9 re is a con/itu5t ( ! concept4 ,x w\ld conclude ! exi/5ce ( a be+ f ! def9ition ( a ^w4 ,?is inf]5ce is ju/ifi$ only on ! basis ( philosophical realism40 ,dove1 ,logic ( ! ,*ri/4 ,fai?1 #ada--8,! ,ontological ,argum5t is ! algebraic =mula ( ! univ]se1 :i* leads to a valid conclusion ) reg>d to real exi/5ce1 only :5 we fill x 9 ) objects ) :i* we become acqua9t$ 9 ! argum5ts a po/]iori40 ,see also ,%$d1 ,hi/4 ,doct41 #a3cca1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3bba-bda1 & 9 ,presb4 ,rev41 ,april1 #ahhd3bab-bbg 7favor+ ! argum5t72 ,fi%]1 ,essays1 #egd2 ,?ompson1 ,*ri/ian ,!ism1 #aga2 ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 ,introd4 to ,*ri/4 ,!ol41 #abb2 ,pfleid]]1 ,die ,religion1 #a3aha-ahg2 ,/udi5 und ,kritik51 #ahge3faa-fee4 ,dorn]1 9 8 ,glaub5slehre1 #a3aig1 gives u ! be/ /atem5t ( ! ,ontological ,argum5t3 8,reason ?9ks ( ,god z exi/+4 ,reason w\ld n be reason1 if x did n ?9k ( ,god z exi/+4 ,reason only is1 ^u ! assumption t ,god is40 ,b ?is is evid5tly n argum5t1 b only vivid /atem5t ( ! necess>y assumption ( ! exi/5ce ( an absolute ,reason :i* conditions & gives validity to ours4 ,al?\gh ?is la/ mu/ be consid]$ ! mo/ p]fect =m ( ! ,ontological ,argum5t1 x is evid5t t x conducts u only to an ideal conclusion1 n to real exi/5ce4 ,9 common ) ! two prec$+ =ms ( ! argum5t1 moreov]1 x tacitly assumes1 z already exi/+ 9 ! human m9d1 t v k ( ,god's exi/5ce :i* x w\ld d]ive f logical demon/ration4 ,x has value1 !re=e1 simply z %[+ :at ,god mu/ be1 if he exi/s at all4 ,b ! exi/5ce ( a ,be+ indef9itely great1 a p]sonal ,cause1 ,contriv] & ,lawgiv]1 has be5 prov$ by ! prec$+ argum5ts2 = ! law ( p>simony requires u to apply ! conclusions ( ! fir/ ?ree argum5ts to "o ,be+1 & n to _m4 ,to ?is "o ,be+ we may n[ ascribe ! inf9ity & p]fection1 ! idea ( :i* lies at ! basis ( ! ,ontological ,argum5t--ascribe !m1 n because !y are demon/rably 81 b because our m5tal con/itution w n all[ u to ?9k o!rwise4 ,?us clo?+ him ) all p]fections :i* ! human m9d c conceive1 & ^! 9 illimitable fullness1 we h "o :om we may ju/ly call ,god4 ,mc,cosh1 ,div4 ,govt41 #ab1 note--8,x is at ?is place1 if we d n mi/ake1 t ! idea ( ! ,inf9ite comes 94 ,! capacity ( ! human m9d to =m su* an idea1 or r its intuitive belief 9 an ,inf9ite ( :i* x feels t x _c =m an adequate conception1 may be no pro( 7z ,kant ma9ta9s7 ( ! exi/5ce ( an inf9ite ,be+2 b x is1 we are conv9c$1 ! means by :i* ! m9d is enabl$ to inve/ ! ,deity1 %[n on o!r gr\nds to exi/1 ) ! attributes ( inf9ity1 i4 e41 to look on 8 be+1 p[]1 goodness1 & all 8 p]fections1 z inf9ite40 ,ev5 ,fl9t1 ,!ism1 #fh1 :o holds t we rea* ! exi/5ce ( ,god by inf]5ce1 speaks ( 8necess>y conditions ( ?\ght & feel+1 & in]adicable aspirations1 :i* =ce on u ideas ( absolute exi/5ce1 inf9ity1 & p]fection1 & w nei!r p]mit u to d5y ^! p]fections to ,god1 nor to ascribe !m to any o!r be+40 ,belief 9 ,god is n ! conclusion ( a demon/ration1 b ! solution ( a problem4 ,cald]wood1 ,moral ,philosophy1 #bbf--8;,ei!r ! :ole "q is assum$ 9 />t+1 or ! ,inf9ite is n rea*$ 9 conclud+40 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #ig-aad1 divides 8 pro( into two p>ts3 ,i4 ,evid5ce ( ! exi/5ce ( ,god f ! intellectual />t+-po9t3 ,! discov]y ( ,m9d 9 ! univ]se is made1 #a4 ?r\gh ! intelligibl5ess ( ! univ]se to u2 #b4 ?r\gh ! idea ( cause2 #c4 ?r\gh ! pres5ce ( ends 9 ! univ]se4 ,,ii4 ,evid5ce ( ! exi/5ce ( ,god f ! religi\s />t+-po9t3 ,! discov]y ( ! good ,god is made1 #a4 ?r\gh ! religi\s nature ( man2 #b4 ?r\gh ! great dilemma--,god ! be/1 or ! wor/2 #c4 ?r\gh ! spiritual exp]i5ce ( m51 especially 9 ,*ri/ianity4 ,s f> z ,dr4 ,cl>ke's pro( is int5d$ to be a /atem5t1 n ( a primitive belief1 b ( a logical process1 we mu/ hold x to be equally defective ) ! ?ree =ms ( pro( :i* we h se5 to furni% "s corroborative evid5ce ( ,god's exi/5ce4 ,dr4 ,cl>ke !re=e does well to add3 8,religion 0 n produc$ by pro( ( ,god's exi/5ce1 & w n be de/roy$ by its insuffici5cy to "s m9ds4 ,religion exi/$ be=e argum5t2 9 fact1 x is ! preci\sness ( religion t leads to ! seek+ = all possible confirmations ( ! reality ( ,god40 ,! ?ree =ms ( pro( already m5tion$--! ,cosmological1 ! ,teleological1 & ! ,an?ropological ,argum5ts--may be lik5$ to ! ?ree ar*es ( a bridge ov] a wide & ru%+ riv]4 ,! bridge has only two defects1 b ^! defects are v s]i\s4 ,! fir/ is t "o _c get on to ! bridge2 ! end t[>d ! hi!r bank is :olly lack+2 ! bridge ( logical argum5t _c be ent]$ ^u except by assum+ ! validity ( logical processes2 ?is assumption takes = grant$ at ! outset ! exi/5ce ( a ,god :o has made our faculties to act correctly2 we get on to ! bridge1 n by logical process1 b only by a leap ( intuition1 & by assum+ at ! beg9n+ ! v ?+ :i* we set out to prove4 ,! second defect ( ! s-call$ bridge ( argum5t is t :5 "o has once gott5 on1 he c nev] get (f4 ,! connection ) ! fur!r bank is also lack+4 ,all ! premises f :i* we argue be+ f9ite1 we are w>rant$ 9 draw+ only a f9ite conclusion4 ,argum5t _c rea* ! ,inf9ite1 & only an inf9ite ,be+ is wor?y to be call$ ,god4 ,we c get (f f our logical bridge1 n by logical process1 b only by ano!r & f9al leap ( intuition1 & by once m assum+ ! exi/5ce ( ! inf9ite ,be+ :om we _h s va9ly s\ght to rea* by m]e argum5t4 ,! process seems to be ref]r$ to 9 ,job #aa3g--8;,can/ ?\ by se>*+ f9d out ,god8 ,can/ ?\ f9d out ! ,almighty unto p]fection80 ,z a logical process ?is is inde$ defective1 s9ce all logic z well z all obs]vation dep5ds = its validity ^u ! presuppos$ exi/5ce ( ,god1 & s9ce ?is p>ticul> process1 ev5 grant+ ! validity ( logic 9 g5]al1 does n w>rant ! conclusion t ,god exi/s1 except ^u a second assumption t our ab/ract ideas ( inf9ity & p]fection are to be appli$ to ! ,be+ to :om argum5t has actually conduct$ u4 ,b al?\gh bo? ends ( ! logical bridge are confess$ly want+1 ! process may s]ve & does s]ve a m useful purpose ?an t ( m]e demon/ration1 namely1 t ( awak5+1 explicat+1 & confirm+ a conviction :i*1 ?\gh ! mo/ fundam5tal ( all1 may yet h be5 p>tially slumb]+ = lack ( ?\ght4 ,morell1 ,philos4 ,fragm5ts1 #agg1 #agi--8,we c1 9 fact1 no m prove ! exi/5ce ( a ,god by a logical argum5t1 ?an we c prove ! exi/5ce ( an ext]nal _w2 b none ! less may we obta9 z /rong a practical conviction ( ! "o1 z ! o!r40 8,we arrive at a sci5tific belief 9 ! exi/5ce ( ,god j z we d at any o!r possible human tru?4 ,we assume x1 z a hypo!sis absolutely necess>y to acc\nt = ! ph5om5a ( ! univ]se2 & !n evid5ces f e qu>t] beg9 to conv]ge ^u x1 until1 9 process ( "t1 ! common s5se ( mank9d1 cultivat$ & enlight5$ by ev] accumulat+ k1 pron\nces ^u ! validity ( ! hypo!sis ) a voice sc>cely less decid$ & univ]sal ?an x does 9 ! case ( our highe/ sci5tific convictions40 ,fi%]1 ,sup]nat4 ,orig9 ( ,*ri/ianity1 #egb--8,:at !n is ! purport & =ce ( ! sev]al argum5ts = ! exi/5ce ( ,god8 ,we reply t ^! pro(s are ! diff]5t modes 9 :i* fai? expresses itself & seeks confirmation4 ,9 !m fai?1 or ! object ( fai?1 is m exactly conceiv$ & def9$1 & 9 !m is f\nd a corroboration1 n arbitr>y b sub/antial & valuable1 ( t fai? :i* spr+s f ! s\l itself4 ,su* pro(s1 !re=e1 are nei!r on ! "o h& suffici5t to create & su/a9 fai?1 nor are !y on ! o!r h& to be set aside z ( no value40 ,a4 ,j4 ,b>rett3 8,! argum5ts are n s mu* a bridge 9 !mselves1 z !y are guys1 to hold firm ! great susp5sion-bridge ( intuition1 by :i* we pass ! gulf f man to ,god4 ,or1 :ile !y are n a ladd] by :i* we may rea* heav51 !y are ! ,ossa on ,pelion1 f ^: comb9$ height we may descry heav540 ,anselm3 8,neglig5tia mihi videtur1 si po/quam confirmati sumus 9 fide non /udemus quod cr$imus intellig]e40 ,bradley1 ,appe>ance & ,reality3 8,metaphysics is ! f9d+ ( bad reasons = :at we believe ^u in/9ct2 b to f9d ^! reasons is no less an in/9ct40 ,ill+wor?1 ,div4 & ,hum4 ,p]sonality1 lect4 ,,iii--8,belief 9 a p]sonal ,god is an in/9ctive judgm5t1 progressively ju/ifi$ by reason40 ,knight1 ,essays 9 ,philosophy1 #bda--,! argum5ts are 8hi/orical memorials ( ! ef=ts ( ! human race to v9dicate to itself ! exi/5ce ( a reality ( :i* x is consci\s1 b :i* x _c p]fectly def9e40 ,h4 ,field+1 ,! ,he>ts ( ,m51 #cac--8;,cre$s are ! gramm> ( religion4 ,!y are to religion :at gramm> is to spee*4 ,words are ! expression ( our wants2 gramm> is ! !ory =m$ aft]w>ds4 ,spee* nev] proce$$ f gramm>1 b ! rev]se4 ,z spee* progresses & *anges f unkn[n causes1 gramm> mu/ foll[40 ,pascal3 8,! he>t has reasons ( its own :i* ! reason does n "k40 ,frances ,p[] ,cobbe3 8,intuitions are ,god's tuitions40 ,on ! :ole subject1 see ,cudwor?1 ,intel4 ,sy/em1 #c3db2 ,cald]wood1 ,philos4 ( ,inf9ite1 #aej sq42 ,curtis1 ,human ,elem5t 9 ,inspiration1 #bdb2 ,peabody1 9 ,&ov] ,rev41 ,july1 #ahhd2 ,hahn1 ,hi/ory ( ,argum5ts = ,exi/5ce ( ,god2 ,lotze1 ,philos4 ( ,religion1 #h-cd2 ,am4 ,j\r4 ,!ol41 ,jan4 #aijf3ec-ga4 ,hegel1 9 8 ,logic1 page #c1 speak+ ( ! disposition to reg>d ! pro(s ( ,god's exi/5ce z ! only means ( produc+ fai? 9 ,god1 says3 8,su* a doctr9e w\ld f9d its p>allel1 if we said t eat+ 0 impossible be=e we _h acquir$ a k ( ! *emical1 botanical & zological qualities ( our food2 & t we mu/ delay dige/ion till we _h f9i%$ ! /udy ( anatomy & physiology40 ,x is a mi/ake to suppose t !re c be no religi\s life )\t a correct !ory ( life4 ,mu/ ,i refuse to dr9k wat] or to brea! air1 until ,i c manufacture bo? = myself8 ,"s ?+s are giv5 to u4 ,among ^! ?+s are 8grace & tru?0 7,john #a3ag2 cf4 #i74 ,b !re are ev] ^? :o are will+ to take no?+ z a free gift1 & :o insi/ on work+ out all k1 z well z all salvation1 by processes ( _! own4 ,pelagianism1 ) its d5ial ( ! doctr9es ( grace1 is b ! fur!r developm5t ( a rationalism :i* refuses to accept primitive tru?s unless ^! c be logically demon/rat$4 ,s9ce ! exi/5ce ( ! s\l1 ( ! _w1 & ( ,god _c be prov$ 9 ?is way1 rationalism is l$ to curtail1 or to mis9t]pret1 ! deliv]ances ( consci\sness1 & h5ce result c]ta9 sy/ems n[ to be m5tion$4 ,*apt] ,,iii4 ,errone\s ,explanations1 ,& ,conclusion4 ,any correct explanation ( ! univ]se mu/ po/ulate an intuitive k ( ! exi/5ce ( ! ext]nal _w1 ( self1 & ( ,god4 ,! desire = sci5tific unity1 h[ev]1 has occasion$ attempts to r$uce ^! ?ree factors to "o1 & accord+ z "o or ano!r ( ! ?ree has be5 reg>d$ z ! all-inclusive pr9ciple1 ! result has be5 ,mat]ialism1 ,mat]iali/ic ,idealism1 or ,ideali/ic ,pan!ism4 ,?is sci5tific impulse is bett] satisfi$ by a sy/em :i* we may designate z ,e?ical ,monism4 ,we may summ>ize ! pres5t *apt] z foll[s3 #a4 ,mat]ialism3 ,univ]se ,atoms4 ,reply3 ,atoms c d no?+ )\t =ce1 & c be no?+ 7intelligible7 )\t ideas4 #b4 ,mat]iali/ic ,idealism3 ,univ]se ,=ce ,ideas4 ,reply3 ,ideas belong to ,m9d1 & ,=ce c be ex]t$ only by ,w4 #c4 ,ideali/ic ,pan!ism3 ,univ]se ,imman5t & ,imp]sonal ,m9d & ,w4 ,reply3 ,_s 9 man %[s t ! ,inf9ite ,_s mu/ be ,transc5d5t & ,p]sonal ,m9d & ,w4 ,we are l$ f ^! ?ree =ms ( error to a conclusion :i* we may d5om9ate #d4 ,e?ical ,monism3 ,univ]se ,f9ite1 p>tial1 grad$ manife/ation ( ! div9e ,life2 ,matt] be+ ,god's self-limitation "u ! law ( necessity1 ,humanity be+ ,god's self-limitation "u ! law ( fre$om1 ,inc>nation & ,atonem5t be+ ,god's self-limitations "u ! law ( grace4 ,metaphysical ,monism1 or ! doctr9e ( "o ,sub/ance1 ,pr9ciple1 or ,gr\nd ( ,be+1 is consi/5t ) ,psy*ological ,dualism1 or ! doctr9e t ! s\l is p]sonally di/9ct f matt] on ! "o h& & f ,god on ! o!r4 ,i4 ,mat]ialism4 ,mat]ialism is t me?od ( ?\ght :i* gives priority to matt]1 r ?an to m9d1 9 its explanations ( ! univ]se4 ,^u ?is view1 mat]ial atoms con/itute ! ultimate & fundam5tal reality ( :i* all ?+s1 rational & irrational1 are b comb9ations & ph5om5a4 ,=ce is reg>d$ z a univ]sal & insep>able prop]ty ( matt]4 ,! elem5t ( tru? 9 mat]ialism is ! reality ( ! ext]nal _w4 ,its error is 9 reg>d+ ! ext]nal _w z hav+ orig9al & indep5d5t exi/5ce1 & 9 reg>d+ m9d z its product4 ,mat]ialism reg>ds atoms z ! bricks ( :i* ! mat]ial univ]se1 ! h\se we inhabit1 is built4 ,sir ,william ,?omson 7,"l ,kelv97 e/imates t1 if a drop ( wat] 7 magnifi$ to ! size ( our e>?1 ! atoms ( :i* x consi/s w\ld c]ta9ly appe> l>g] ?an boy's m>bles1 & yet w\ld be small] ?an billi>d balls4 ,( ^! atoms1 all ?+s1 visible & invisible1 are made4 ,m9d1 ) all its activities1 is a comb9ation or ph5om5on ( atoms4 8,man i/ 0 er iszt3 ohne ,phosphor ke9 ,g$anke0--8,"o is :at he eats3 )\t phosphorus1 no ?\ght40 ,e?ics is a bill ( f>e2 & wor%ip1 l heat1 is a mode ( motion4 ,agassiz1 h[ev]1 wittily ask$3 8,are fi%]m51 !n1 m intellig5t ?an f>m]s1 because !y eat s mu* fi%1 & !re=e take 9 m phosphorus80 ,x is evid5t t mu* is "h attribut$ to atoms :i* really belongs to =ce4 ,deprive atoms ( =ce1 & all t rema9s is ext5sion1 :i* space z]o4 ,moreov]1 8if atoms are ext5d$1 !y _c be ultimate1 = ext5sion implies divisibility1 & t :i* is conceivably divisible _c be a philosophical ultimate4 ,b1 if atoms are n ext5d$1 !n ev5 an inf9ite multiplication & comb9ation ( !m c\ld n produce an ext5d$ sub/ance4 ,fur!rmore1 an atom t is nei!r ext5d$ sub/ance nor ?9k+ sub/ance is inconceivable4 ,! real ultimate is =ce1 & ?is =ce _c be ex]t$ by no?+1 b1 z we %all h]eaft] see1 c be ex]t$ only by a p]sonal ,_s1 = ?is alone possesses ! *>act]i/ics ( reality1 namely1 def9it5ess1 unity1 & activity40 ,n only =ce b also intellig5ce mu/ be attribut$ to atoms1 be=e !y c expla9 any op]ation ( nature4 ,h]s*el says n only t 8! =ce ( gravitation seems l t ( a univ]sal w10 b t ! atoms !mselves1 9 recogniz+ ea* o!r 9 ord] to comb9e1 %[ a great deal ( 8pres5ce ( m9d40 ,ladd1 ,introd4 to ,philosophy1 #bfi--8;,a di/+ui%$ a/ronom] has said t e body 9 ! sol> sy/em is behav+ z if x knew precisely h[ x ought to behave 9 consi/5cy ) its own nature1 & ) ! behavior ( e o!r body 9 ! same sy/em4444 ,ea* atom has danc$ c\ntless millions ( miles1 ) c\ntless millions ( diff]5t p>tn]s1 _m ( :i* requir$ an important modification ( its mode ( motion1 )\t ev] dep>t+ f ! correct /ep or ! "r "t40 ,j4 ,p4 ,cooke1 ,cr$5tials ( ,sci5ce1 #ajd1 #agg1 sugge/s t some?+ m ?an atoms is ne$$ to expla9 ! univ]se4 ,a correlat+ ,intellig5ce & ,w mu/ be assum$4 ,atoms by !mselves w\ld be l a heap ( loose nails :i* ne$ to be magnetiz$ if !y are to hold toge!r4 ,all /ructures w\ld be resolv$1 & all =ms ( matt] w\ld disappe>1 if ! ,pres5ce :i* su/a9s !m 7 )drawn4 ,! atom1 l ! monad ( ,leibnitz1 is 8p>vus 9 suo g5]e deus0--8a little god 9 its nature0--only because x is ! expression ( ! m9d & w ( an imman5t ,god4 ,plato speaks ( m5 :o are 8dazzl$ by too ne> a look at mat]ial ?+s40 ,!y d n p]ceive t ^! v mat]ial ?+s1 s9ce !y c be int]pret$ only 9 t]ms ( _s1 mu/ !mselves be ess5tially spiritual4 ,mat]ialism is ! explanation ( a _w ( :i* we "k some?+--! _w ( m9d--by a _w ( :i* we "k next to no?+--! _w ( matt]4 ,upton1 ,hibb]t ,lectures1 #big1 #bih--8;,h[ ab\t y\r mat]ial atoms & bra9-molecules8 ,!y h no real exi/5ce save z objects ( ?\ght1 & !re=e ! v ?\ght1 :i* y say y\r atoms produce1 turns out to be ! ess5tial precondition ( _! own exi/5ce40 ,) ?is agree ! words ( ,dr4 ,ladd3 8,k ( matt] involves repeat$ activities ( s5sation & reflection1 ( inductive & d$uctive inf]5ce1 ( intuitional belief 9 sub/ance4 ,^! are all activities ( m9d4 ,only z ! m9d has a self-consci\s life1 is any k ( :at matt] is1 or c d1 to be ga9$4444 ,ev]y?+ is real :i* is ! p]man5t subject ( *ang+ /ates4 ,t :i* t\*es1 feels1 sees1 is m real ?an t :i* is t\*$1 felt1 se540 ,h4 ,n4 ,g>dn]1 ,presb4 ,rev41 #ahhe3cja1 #ffe1 #fff--8,m9d gives to matt] its *ief mean+1--h5ce matt] alone c nev] expla9 ! univ]se40 ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #ca--8,m9d is n ! product ( nature1 b ! necess>y con/itu5t ( nature1 consid]$ z an ord]$ kn[able sy/em40 ,fras]1 ,philos4 ( ,!ism3 8,an immoral act mu/ orig9ate 9 ! immoral ag5t2 a physical effect is n kn[n to orig9ate 9 its physical cause40 ,matt]1 inorganic & organic1 presupposes m9d2 b x is n true t m9d presupposes matt]4 ,le,conte3 8,if ,i c\ld remove y\r bra9 cap1 :at w\ld ,i see8 ,only physical *anges4 ,b y--:at d y p]ceive8 ,consci\sness1 ?\ght1 emotion1 w4 ,n[ take ext]nal nature1 ! ,cosmos4 ,! obs]v] f ! outside sees only physical ph5om5a4 ,b mu/ !re n be 9 ?is case also--on ! o!r side--psy*ical ph5om5a1 a ,self1 a ,p]son1 a ,w80 ,! impossibility ( f9d+ 9 matt]1 reg>d$ z m]e atoms1 any ( ! attributes ( a cause1 has l$ to a g5]al ab&onm5t ( ?is old ,mat]ialism ( ,democritus1 ,epicurus1 ,lucretius1 ,condillac1 ,holba*1 ,feu]ba*1 ,b*n]2 & ,mat]iali/ic ,idealism has tak5 its place1 :i* in/ead ( reg>d+ =ce z a prop]ty ( matt]1 reg>ds matt] z a manife/ation ( =ce4 ,f ?is section we !re=e pass to ,mat]iali/ic ,idealism1 & inquire :e!r ! univ]se c be int]pret$ simply z a sy/em ( =ce & ( ideas4 ,a qu>t] ( a c5tury ago1 ,john ,tyndall1 9 8 op5+ address z ,presid5t ( ! ,briti% ,association at ,belfa/1 decl>$ t 9 matt] 0 to be f\nd ! promise & pot5cy ( e =m ( life4 ,b 9 #ahih1 ,sir ,william ,crookes1 9 8 address z ,presid5t ( t same ,briti% ,association1 rev]s$ ! apo!gm1 & decl>$ t 9 life he saw ! promise & pot5cy ( e =m ( matt]4 ,see ,lange1 ,hi/ory ( ,mat]ialism2 ,janet1 ,mat]ialism2 ,fabri1 ,mat]ialismus2 ,h]zog1 ,encyclopdie1 art43 ,mat]ialismus2 b esp41 ,/allo1 ,mod]n ,physics1 #adh-agj4 ,9 addition to ! g5]al error indicat$ above1 we object to ?is sy/em z foll[s3 #a4 ,9 kn[+ matt]1 ! m9d necess>ily judges itself to be diff]5t 9 k9d1 & high] 9 rank1 ?an ! matt] :i* x kn[s4 ,we "h /ate simply an intuitive conviction4 ,! m9d1 9 us+ its physical organism & ?r\gh x br++ ext]nal nature into its s]vice1 recognizes itself z diff]5t f & sup]ior to matt]4 ,see ,m>t9eau1 quot$ 9 ,brit4 ,qu>41 ,april1 #ahhb3agc1 & ! article ( ,presid5t ,?omas ,hill 9 ! ,biblio!ca ,sacra1 ,april1 #aheb3cec--8;,all t is really giv5 by ! act ( s5se-p]ception is ! exi/5ce ( ! consci\s self1 float+ 9 b\ndless space & b\ndless "t1 surr\nd$ & su/a9$ by b\ndless p[]4 ,! mat]ial mov$1 :i* we at fir/ ?9k ! great reality1 is only ! %ad[ ( a real be+1 :i* is immat]ial40 ,h>ris1 ,philos4 ,basis ( ,!ism1 #cag--8;,imag9e an inf9itesimal be+ 9 ! bra91 wat*+ ! action ( ! molecules1 b miss+ ! ?\ght4 ,s sci5ce obs]ves ! univ]se1 b misses ,god40 ,hebb]d1 9 ,j\rn4 ,spec4 ,philos41 ,april1 #ahhf3ace4 ,rob]t ,br[n+1 8! subtle/ ass]tor ( ! s\l 9 song10 makes ! ,pope1 9 ,! ,r+ & ! ,book1 say3 8,m9d is n matt]1 nor f matt]1 b above40 ,s ,presid5t ,francis ,wayl&3 8,:at is m9d80 8,no matt]40 8,:at is matt]80 8,nev] m9d40 ,sully1 ,! ,human ,m9d1 #b3cfi--8;,consci\sness is a reality :olly disp>ate f mat]ial processes1 & _c !re=e be resolv$ into ^!4 ,mat]ialism makes t :i* is imm$iately kn[n 7our m5tal /ates7 subord9ate to t :i* is only indirectly or inf]5tially kn[n 7ext]nal ?+s74 ,moreov]1 a mat]ial entity exi/+ p] se out ( relation to a cogitant m9d is an absurdity40 ,z mat]iali/s "w out _! !ory1 _! s-call$ matt] gr[s m & m e!real1 until at la/ a /age is rea*$ :5 x _c be di/+ui%$ f :at o!rs call _s4 ,m>t9eau3 8,! matt] !y describe is s exce$+ly clev] t x is up to any?+1 ev5 to writ+ ,hamlet & discov]+ its own evolution4 ,9 %ort1 b = ! spell+ ( its "n1 x does n seem to diff] appreciably f our old fri5ds1 ,m9d & ,god40 ,a4 ,w4 ,mom]ie1 9 ,*ri/ianity & ,evolution1 #ed--8;,a be+ consci\s ( 8 unity _c possibly be =m$ out ( a numb] ( atoms unconsci\s ( _! div]sity4 ,any "o :o ?9ks ?is possible is capable ( ass]t+ t half a doz5 fools might be comp\nd$ into a s+le wise man40 #b4 ,s9ce ! m9d's attributes ( 7a7 cont9u\s id5tity1 7b7 self-activity1 7c7 unrelat$ness to space1 are diff]5t 9 k9d & high] 9 rank ?an ! attributes ( matt]1 x is rational to conclude t m9d is itself diff]5t 9 k9d f matt] & high] 9 rank ?an matt]4 ,?is is an argum5t f specific qualities to t :i* und]lies & expla9s ! qualities4 7a7 ,memory proves p]sonal id5tity4 ,?is is n an id5tity ( mat]ial atoms1 = atoms *ange4 ,! molecules t come _c rememb] ^? t dep>t4 ,"s immutable "p 9 ! bra98 organiz$ or unorganiz$8 ,organiz$ decays2 unorganiz$ s\l4 7b7 ,in]tia %[s t matt] is n self-mov+4 ,x acts only z x is act$ ^u4 ,a s+le atom w\ld nev] move4 ,two portions are necess>y1 & ^!1 9 ord] to useful action1 require adju/m5t by a p[] :i* does n belong to matt]4 ,evolution ( ! univ]se inexplicable1 unless matt] 7 fir/ mov$ by "s p[] outside itself4 ,see ,duke ( ,argyll1 ,reign ( ,law1 #ib4 7c7 ,! highe/ activities ( m9d are indep5d5t ( kn[n physical conditions4 ,m9d controls & subdues ! body4 ,x does n cease to gr[ :5 ! gr[? ( ! body ceases4 ,:5 ! body ne>s dissolution1 ! m9d (t5 ass]ts itself mo/ /rik+ly4 ,kant3 8,unity ( appreh5sion is possible on acc\nt ( ! transc5d5tal unity ( self-consci\sness40 ,i get my idea ( unity f ! indivisible self4 ,/\t1 ,manual ( ,psy*ology1 #ec--8,s f> z matt] exi/s indep5d5tly ( its pres5tation to a cognitive subject1 x _c h mat]ial prop]ties1 su* z ext5sion1 h>dness1 color1 weight1 etc4444 ,! _w ( mat]ial ph5om5a presupposes a sy/em ( immat]ial ag5cy4 ,9 ?is immat]ial sy/em ! individual consci\sness orig9ates4 ,?is ag5cy1 "s say1 is ?\ght1 o!rs w40 ,a4 ,j4 ,dubois1 9 ,c5tury ,magaz9e1 ,dec4 #ahid3bbh--,s9ce ea* ?\ght involves a molecul> movem5t 9 ! bra91 & ?is moves ! :ole univ]se1 m9d is ! secret ( ! univ]se1 & we %\ld int]pret nature z ! expression ( und]ly+ purpose4 ,sci5ce is m9d foll[+ ! traces ( m9d4 ,!re c be no m9d )\t antec$5t m9d4 ,t all human be+s h ! same m5tal modes %[s t ^! modes are n due simply to environm5t4 ,b[ne3 8,?+s act ^u ! m9d & ! m9d reacts ) k4 ,kn[+ is n a passive receiv+1 b an active con/ru+40 ,wundt3 8,we are compell$ to admit t ! physical developm5t is n ! cause1 b mu* m ! effect1 ( psy*ical developm5t40 ,paul ,c>us1 ,s\l ( ,man1 #eb-fd1 def9es s\l z 8! =m ( an organism10 & memory z 8! psy*ical aspect ( ! pres]vation ( =m 9 liv+ sub/ance40 ,?is seems to give priority to ! organism r ?an to ! s\l1 reg>dless ( ! fact t )\t s\l no organism is conceivable4 ,clay _c be ! ance/or ( ! pott]1 nor /one ! ance/or ( ! mason1 nor wood ! ance/or ( ! c>p5t]4 ,w4 ,n4 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #ii--8,! intelligibl5ess ( ! univ]se to u is /rong & ev] pres5t evid5ce t !re is an all-p]vad+ rational ,m9d1 f :i* ! univ]se receiv$ its "*40 ,we mu/ add to ! maxim1 8,cogito1 ergo sum10 ! o!r maxim1 8,intelligo1 ergo ,deus e/40 ,pfleid]]1 ,philos4 ,relig41 #a3bgc--8,! :ole ideali/ic philosophy ( mod]n times is 9 fact only ! c>ry+ out & gr\nd+ ( ! conviction t ,nature is ord]$ by ,_s & = ,_s1 z a subs]vi5t means = its et]nal ends2 t x is !re=e n1 z ! hea!n naturalism ?\ght1 ! "o & all1 ! la/ & highe/ ( ?+s1 b has ! ,_s1 & ! moral ,ends ov] x1 z its ,"l & ,ma/]40 ,! consci\sness by :i* ?+s are kn[n prec$es ! ?+s !mselves1 9 ! ord] ( logic1 & !re=e _c be expla9$ by !m or d]iv$ f !m4 ,see ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #bb1 #aca1 #acb4 ,mc,cosh1 ,*ri/ianity & ,positivism1 *ap4 on ,mat]ialism2 ,div9e ,gov]nm5t1 #ga-id2 ,intuitions1 #adj-ade4 ,hopk9s1 ,/udy ( ,man1 #ec-ef2 ,morell1 ,hi/4 ( ,philosophy1 #cah-ccd2 ,hickok1 ,rational ,cosmology1 #djc2 ,!ol4 ,eclectic1 #f3eee2 ,appleton1 ,works1 #a3aea-aed2 ,cald]wood1 ,moral ,philos41 #bce2 ,ulrici1 ,leib und ,seele1 #fhh-gbe1 & synopsis1 9 ,bap4 ,qu>41 ,july1 #ahgc3chj4 #c4 ,m9d r ?an matt] mu/ !re=e be reg>d$ z ! orig9al & indep5d5t entity1 unless x c be sci5tifically demon/rat$ t m9d is mat]ial 9 its orig9 & nature4 ,b all attempts to expla9 ! psy*ical f ! physical1 or ! organic f ! inorganic1 are ackn[l$g$ failures4 ,! mo/ t c be claim$ is1 t psy*ical are always accompani$ by physical *anges1 & t ! inorganic is ! basis & support ( ! organic4 ,al?\gh ! precise connection betwe5 ! m9d & ! body is unkn[n1 ! fact t ! cont9uity ( physical *anges is unbrok5 9 times ( psy*ical activity r5d]s x c]ta9 t m9d is n trans=m$ physical =ce4 ,if ! facts ( s5sation indicate ! dep5d5ce ( m9d ^u body1 ! facts ( volition equally indicate ! dep5d5ce ( body ^u m9d4 ,! *emi/ c produce organic1 b n organiz$1 sub/ances4 ,! life _c be produc$ f matt]4 ,ev5 9 liv+ ?+s progress is secur$ only by plan4 ,multiplication ( desir$ advantage1 9 ! ,d>w9ian s*eme1 requires a select+ ?\ght2 9 o!r words ! natural selection is artificial selection aft] all4 ,john ,fiske1 ,de/9y ( ! ,creature1 #aji--8;,c]ebral physiology tells u t1 dur+ ! pres5t life1 al?\gh ?\ght & feel+ are always manife/$ 9 connection ) a peculi> =m ( matt]1 yet by no possibility c ?\ght & feel+ be 9 any s5se ! product ( matt]4 ,no?+ c\ld be m grossly unsci5tific ?an ! fam\s rem>k ( ,cabanis1 t ! bra9 secretes ?\ght z ! liv] secretes bile4 ,x is n ev5 correct to say t ?\ght goes on 9 ! bra94 ,:at goes on 9 ! bra9 is an amaz+ly complex s]ies ( molecul> movem5ts1 ) :i* ?\ght & feel+ are 9 "s unkn[n way correlat$1 n z effects or z causes1 b z concomitants40 ,leibnitz's 8pre/abli%$ h>mony0 indicates ! difficulty ( def9+ ! relation betwe5 m9d & matt]4 ,!y are l two entirely disconnect$ clocks1 ! "o ( :i* has a dial & indicates ! h\r by its h&s1 :ile ! o!r )\t a dial simultane\sly indicates ! same h\r by its /rik+ app>atus4 ,to ,leibnitz ! _w is an aggregate ( atomic s\ls lead+ absolutely sep>ate lives4 ,!re is no real action ( "o ^u ano!r4 ,ev]y?+ 9 ! monad is ! developm5t ( its individual un/imulat$ activity4 ,yet !re is a pre/abli%$ h>mony ( !m all1 arrang$ f ! beg9n+ by ! ,creator4 ,! int]nal developm5t ( ea* monad is s adju/$ to t ( all ! o!r monads1 z to produce ! false impression t !y are mutually influ5c$ by ea* o!r 7see ,johnson1 9 ,&ov] ,rev41 ,apl4 #ahij3djg1 #djh74 ,leibnitz's !ory involves ! complete rejection ( ! fre$om ( ! human w 9 ! lib]t>ian s5se4 ,to escape f ?is arbitr>y connection ( m9d & matt] 9 ,leibnitz's pre/abli%$ h>mony1 ,sp9oza reject$ ! ,c>tesian doctr9e ( two ,god-creat$ sub/ances1 & ma9ta9$ t !re is b "o fundam5tal sub/ance1 namely1 ,god himself 7see ,upton1 ,hibb]t ,lectures1 #agb74 ,!re is an increas$ fl[ ( blood to ! head 9 times ( m5tal activity4 ,sometimes1 9 int5se heat ( lit]>y composition1 ! blood fairly surges ?r\gh ! bra94 ,no dim9ution1 b fur!r increase1 ( physical activity accompanies ! greate/ ef=ts ( m9d4 ,lay a man ^u a balance2 fire a pi/ol %ot or inject sudd5ly a great ?\ght into 8 m9d2 at once he w tip ! balance1 & tumble ^u 8 head4 ,romanes1 ,m9d & ,motion1 #ba--8;,consci\sness causes physical *anges1 b n vice v]sa4 ,to say t m9d is a function ( motion is to say t m9d is a function ( itself1 s9ce motion exi/s only = m9d4 ,bett] suppose ! physical & ! psy*ical to be only "o1 z 9 ! viol9 s\nd & vibration are "o4 ,volition is a cause 9 nature because x has c]ebration = its obv]se & insep>able side4 ,b if !re is no motion )\t m9d1 !n !re c be no univ]se )\t ,god40444 #cd--8;,because )9 ! limits ( human exp]i5ce m9d is only kn[n z associat$ ) bra91 x does n foll[ t m9d _c exi/ )\t bra94 ,helmholtz's explanation ( ! effect ( "o ( ,bee?ov5's sonatas on ! bra9 may be p]fectly correct1 b ! explanation ( ! effect giv5 by a musician may be equally correct )9 its category40 ,h]b]t ,sp5c]1 ,pr9ciples ( ,psy*ology1 #a3 #ef--8,two ?+s1 m9d & n]v\s action1 exi/ toge!r1 b we _c imag9e h[ !y are relat$0 7see review ( ,sp5c]'s ,psy*ology1 9 ,n4 ,engl&]1 ,july1 #ahgc74 ,tyndall1 ,fragm5ts ( ,sci5ce1 #abj--8,! passage f ! physics ( ! bra9 to ! facts ( consci\sness is un?9kable40 ,s*urman1 ,agno/icism & ,religion1 #ie--8,! metamorphosis ( vibrations into consci\s ideas is a miracle1 9 comp>ison ) :i* ! float+ ( iron or ! turn+ ( wat] into w9e is easily cr$ible40 ,ba91 ,m9d & ,body1 #aca--,!re is no break 9 ! physical cont9uity4 ,see ,brit4 ,qu>41 ,jan4 #ahgd2 art4 by ,h]b]t1 on ,m9d & ! ,sci5ce ( ,en]gy2 ,mc,cosh1 ,intuitions1 #ade2 ,talbot1 9 ,bap4 ,qu>41 ,jan4 #ahga4 ,on ,geul9cx's 8occasional causes0 & ,desc>tes's dualism1 see ,m>t9eau1 ,types1 #add1 #ade1 #aef-aeh1 & ,/udy1 #b3gg4 #d4 ,! mat]iali/ic !ory1 d5y+ z x does ! priority ( _s1 c furni% no suffici5t cause = ! highe/ features ( ! exi/+ univ]se1 namely1 its p]sonal intellig5ces1 its intuitive ideas1 its free-w1 its moral progress1 its beliefs 9 ,god & immortality4 ,h]b]t1 ,mod]n ,realism ,exam9$3 8,mat]ialism has no physical evid5ce ( ! exi/5ce ( consci\sness 9 o!rs4 ,z x decl>es our fell[ m5 to be de/itute ( free volition1 s x %\ld decl>e !m de/itute ( consci\sness2 %\ld call !m1 z well z brutes1 pure automata4 ,if physics are all1 !re is no ,god1 b !re is also no man1 exi/+40 ,"s ( ! e>ly foll[]s ( ,desc>tes us$ to kick & beat _! dogs1 laugh+ mean:ile at _! cries & call+ !m ! 8creak+ ( ! ma*9e40 ,huxley1 :o calls ! brutes 8consci\s automata10 believes 9 ! gradual bani%m5t1 f all regions ( human ?\ght1 ( :at we call _s & spontaneity3 8,a spontane\s act is an absurdity2 x is simply an effect t is uncaus$40 ,james1 ,psy*ology1 #a3adi--8,! girl 9 ,mid%ipman ,easy c\ld n excuse ! illegitimacy ( h] *ild by say+ t #8x 0 a v small "o4' ,& consci\sness1 h[ev] small1 is an illegitimate bir? 9 any philosophy t />ts )\t x1 & yet pr(esses to expla9 all facts by cont9u$ evolution4444 ,mat]ialism d5ies reality to almo/ all ! impulses :i* we mo/ *]i%4 ,h5ce x w fail ( univ]sal adoption40 ,cl]k ,maxwell1 ,life1 #cia--8,! atoms are a v t\gh lot1 & c /& a great deal ( knock+ ab\t1 & x is /range to f9d a numb] ( !m comb9+ to =m a man ( feel+4444 #dbf--;,i h look$ into mo/ philosophical sy/ems1 & ,i h se5 none t w "w )\t a ,god40 ,presid5t ,e4 ,b4 ,&rews3 8,m9d is ! only sub/antive ?+ 9 ?is univ]se1 & all else is adjective4 ,matt] is n primordial1 b is a function ( _s40 ,!odore ,p>k]3 8,man is ! highe/ product ( 8 own hi/ory4 ,! discov]] f9ds no?+ s tall or gr& z himself1 no?+ s valuable to him4 ,! greate/ /> is at ! small end ( ! telescope--! /> t is look+1 n look$ aft]1 nor look$ at40 ,mat]ialism makes m5 to be 8a s]io-comic procession ( wax figures or ( cunn+ ca/s 9 clay0 7,b[ne74 ,man is 8! cunn+e/ ( clocks40 ,b if !re 7 no?+ b matt]1 !re c\ld be no mat]ialism1 = a sy/em ( ?\ght1 l mat]ialism1 implies consci\sness4 ,m>t9eau1 ,types1 preface1 xii1 xiii--8,x 0 ! irresi/ible plead+ ( ! moral consci\sness :i* fir/ drove me to rebel aga9/ ! limits ( ! m]ely sci5tific conception4 ,x became incr$ible to me t no?+ 0 possible except ! actual4444 ,is !re !n no ought to be1 o!r ?an :at is80 ,dewey1 ,psy*ology1 #hd--8;,a _w )\t ideal elem5ts w\ld be "o 9 :i* ! home w\ld be f\r walls & a ro( to keep out cold & wet2 ! table a mess = animals2 & ! grave a hole 9 ! gr\nd40 ,om> ,khayym1 ,rubaiyat1 /anza #gb--8;,& t inv]t$ b[l !y call ! ,sky1 ,:]eund] crawl+ coop'd we live & die1 ,lift n y\r h&s to ,x = help--= x ,z impot5tly moves z y or ,i40 ,victor ,hugo3 8,y say ! s\l is no?+ b ! resultant ( bodily p[]s8 ,:y !n is my s\l m lum9\s :5 my bodily p[]s beg9 to fail8 ,w9t] is on my head1 & et]nal spr+ is 9 my he>t4444 ,! ne>] ,i approa* ! end1 ! pla9] ,i he> ! immortal symphonies ( ! worlds :i* invite me40 ,diman1 ,!i/ic ,argum5t1 #cdh--8,mat]ialism c nev] expla9 ! fact t matt] is always comb9$ ) =ce4 ,cord9ate pr9ciples8 !n dualism1 in/ead ( monism4 ,=ce cause ( matt]8 !n we pres]ve unity1 b de/roy mat]ialism2 = we trace matt] to an immat]ial s\rce4 ,beh9d multiplicity ( natural =ces we mu/ po/ulate "s s+le p[]--:i* c be no?+ b cord9at+ m9d40 ,m>k ,hopk9s sums up ,mat]ialism 9 ,pr9ceton ,rev41 ,nov4 #ahgi3dij--8a4 ,man1 :o is a p]son1 is made by a ?+1 i4 e41 matt]4 #b4 ,matt] is to be wor%ip$ z man's mak]1 if any?+ is to be 7,rom4 #a3be74 #c4 ,man is to wor%ip himself--8 ,god is 8 belly40 ,see also ,m>t9eau1 ,religion & ,mat]ialism1 #be-ca1 ,types1 #a3 preface1 xii1 xiii1 & ,/udy1 #a3bdh1 #bej1 #cde2 ,*ri/lieb1 ,mod]n ,d\bt & ,*ri/ian ,belief1 #ade-afa2 ,bu*anan1 ,mod]n ,a!ism1 #bdg1 #bdh2 ,mc,cosh1 9 ,int]national ,rev41 ,jan4 #ahie2 ,contemp4 ,rev41 ,jan4 #ahge1 art43 ,man ,transcorporeal2 ,cald]wood1 ,relations ( ,m9d & ,bra92 ,laycock1 ,m9d & ,bra92 ,diman1 ,!i/ic ,argum5t1 #ceh2 ,wilk9son1 9 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #c3no4 #ag2 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3dhg-dii2 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,philos4 & ,relig41 #ca-ch4 ,,ii4 ,mat]iali/ic ,idealism4 ,idealism prop] is t me?od ( ?\ght :i* reg>ds all k z conv]sant only ) affections ( ! p]cipi5t m9d4 ,its elem5t ( tru? is ! fact t ^! affections ( ! p]cipi5t m9d are ! conditions ( our k4 ,its error is 9 d5y+ t ?r\gh ^! & 9 ^! we "k t :i* exi/s indep5d5tly ( our consci\sness4 ,! idealism ( ! pres5t day is ma9ly a mat]iali/ic idealism4 ,x def9es matt] & m9d alike 9 t]ms ( s5sation1 & reg>ds bo? z opposite sides or successive manife/ations ( "o und]ly+ & unkn[able =ce4 ,mod]n subjective idealism is ! developm5t ( a pr9ciple f\nd z f> back z ,locke4 ,locke d]iv$ all our k f s5sation2 ! m9d only comb9es ideas :i* s5sation furni%es1 b gives no mat]ial ( its own4 ,b]keley held t ext]nally we c be sure only ( s5sations1--_c be sure t any ext]nal _w exi/s ap>t f m9d4 ,b]keley's idealism1 h[ev]1 0 objective2 = he ma9ta9$ t :ile ?+s d n exi/ indep5d5tly ( consci\sness1 !y d exi/ indep5d5tly ( our consci\sness1 namely1 9 ! m9d ( ,god1 :o 9 a correct philosophy takes ! place ( a m9dless ext]nal _w z ! cause ( our ideas4 ,kant1 9 l mann]1 held to exi/5ces outside ( our own m9ds1 al?\gh he reg>d$ ^! exi/5ces z unkn[n & unkn[able4 ,ov] aga9/ ^! =ms ( objective idealism we mu/ put ! subjective idealism ( ,hume1 :o held t int]nally also we _c be sure ( any?+ b m5tal ph5om5a2 we "k ?\ghts1 feel+s & volitions1 b we d n "k m5tal sub/ance )91 any m ?an we "k mat]ial sub/ance )\t2 our ideas are a /r+ ( beads1 )\t any /r+2 we ne$ no cause = ^! ideas1 9 an ext]nal _w1 a s\l1 or ,god4 ,mill1 ,sp5c]1 ,ba9 & ,tyndall are ,humi/s1 & x is _! subjective idealism :i* we oppose4 ,all ^! reg>d ! mat]ial atom z a m]e c5tre ( =ce1 or a hypo!tical cause ( s5sations4 ,matt] is !re=e a manife/ation ( =ce1 z to ! old mat]ialism =ce 0 a prop]ty ( matt]4 ,b if matt]1 m9d & ,god are no?+ b s5sations1 !n ! body itself is no?+ b s5sations4 ,!re is no body to h ! s5sations1 & no _s1 ei!r human or div9e1 to produce !m4 ,john ,/u>t ,mill1 9 8 ,exam9ation ( ,sir ,william ,hamilton1 #a3bcd-bec1 makes s5sations ! only orig9al s\rces ( k4 ,he def9es matt] z 8a p]man5t possibility ( s5sation10 & m9d z 8a s]ies ( feel+s aw>e ( itself40 ,s ,huxley calls matt] 8only a "n = ! unkn[n cause ( ! /ates ( consci\sness02 al?\gh he also decl>es3 8,if ,i am compell$ to *oose betwe5 ! mat]ialism ( a man l ,b*n] & ! idealism ( ,b]keley1 ,i w\ld h to agree ) ,b]keley40 ,he w\ld hold to ! priority ( matt]1 & yet reg>d matt] z :olly ideal4 ,s9ce ,john ,/u>t ,mill1 ( all ! mat]iali/ic ideali/s1 gives ! mo/ precise def9itions ( matt] & ( m9d1 we attempt to %[ ! inadequacy ( 8 treatm5t4 ,! mo/ complete refutation ( subjective idealism is t ( ,sir ,william ,hamilton1 9 8 ,metaphysics1 #cdh-cgb1 & ,!ories ( ,s5se-p]ception--! reply to ,br[n4 ,see cond5s$ /atem5t ( ,hamilton's view1 ) e/imate & criticism1 9 ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #bcf-bdj1 & on ,idealism1 #abi1 #acb4 ,port] holds t orig9al p]ception gives u simply affections ( our own s5sorium2 z cause ( ^!1 we ga9 k ( ext5d$ ext]nality4 ,s ,sir ,william ,hamilton3 8,s5sation prop] has no object b a subject-object40 ,b bo? ,port] & ,hamilton hold t ?r\gh ^! s5sations we "k t :i* exi/s indep5d5tly ( our s5sations4 ,hamilton's natural realism1 h[ev]1 0 an exagg]ation ( ! tru?4 ,b[ne1 ,introd4 to ,psy*4 ,!ory1 #beg1 #beh--8;,9 ,sir ,william ,hamilton's desire to h no g-betwe5s 9 p]ception1 he 0 =c$ to ma9ta9 t e s5sation is felt :]e x seems to be1 & h5ce t ! m9d fills out ! entire body4 ,likewise he _h to affirm t ! object 9 vision is n ! ?+1 b ! rays ( light1 & ev5 ! object itself _h1 at la/1 to be br\ght into consci\sness4 ,?us he rea*$ ! absurdity t ! true object 9 p]ception is some?+ ( :i* we are totally unconsci\s40 ,surely we _c be imm$iately consci\s ( :at is outside ( consci\sness4 ,james1 ,psy*ology1 #a3aa--8,! t]m9al organs are telephones1 & bra9-cells are ! receiv]s at :i* ! m9d li/5s40 ,b]keley's view is to be f\nd 9 8 ,pr9ciples ( ,human ,k1 #ah sq4 ,see also ,presb4 ,rev41 ,apl4 #ahhe3cja-cae2 ,j\rn4 ,spec4 ,philos41 #ahhd3bdf-bfj1 #chc-cii2 ,tullo*1 ,mod4 ,!ories1 #cfj1 #cfa2 ,encyc4 ,britannica1 art43 ,b]keley4 ,!re is1 h[ev]1 an idealism :i* is n op5 to ,hamilton's objections1 & to :i* mo/ rec5t philosoph]s give _! adhesion4 ,x is ! objective idealism ( ,lotze4 ,x argues t we "k no?+ ( ! ext5d$ _w except ?r\gh ! =ces :i* impress our n]v\s organism4 ,^! =ces take ! =m ( vibrations ( air or e!r1 & we int]pret !m z s\nd1 light1 or motion1 accord+ z !y affect our n]ves ( he>+1 sight1 or t\*4 ,b ! only =ce :i* we imm$iately "k is t ( our own wills1 & we c ei!r n und]/& matt] at all or we mu/ und]/& x z ! product ( a w comp>able to our own4 ,?+s are simply 8concret$ laws ( action10 or div9e ideas to :i* p]man5t reality has be5 giv5 by div9e w4 ,:at we p]ceive 9 ! normal ex]cise ( our faculties has exi/5ce n only = u b = all intellig5t be+s & = ,god himself3 9 o!r words1 our idealism is n subjective1 b objective4 ,we h se5 9 ! previ\s section t atoms _c expla9 ! univ]se1--!y presuppose bo? ideas & =ce4 ,we n[ see t ?is =ce presupposes w1 & ^! ideas presuppose m9d4 ,b1 z x /ill may be claim$ t ?is m9d is n self-consci\s m9d & t ?is w is n p]sonal w1 we pass 9 ! next section to consid] ,ideali/ic ,pan!ism1 ( :i* ^! claims are *>act]i/ic4 ,mat]iali/ic ,idealism1 9 tru?1 is b a half-way h\se betwe5 ,mat]ialism & ,pan!ism1 9 :i* no p]man5t lodg+ is to be f\nd by ! logical intellig5ce4 ,lotze1 ,outl9es ( ,metaphysics1 #aeb--8,! objectivity ( our cognition consi/s !re=e 9 ?is1 t x is n a mean+less play ( m]e seem+2 b x br+s be=e u a _w ^: coh]5cy is ord]$ 9 pursuance ( ! injunction ( ! sole ,reality 9 ! _w1 to wit1 ! ,good4 ,our cognition ?us possesses m ( tru? ?an if x copi$ exactly a _w t has no value 9 itself4 ,al?\gh x does n compreh5d 9 :at mann] all t is ph5om5on is pres5t$ to ! view1 /ill x und]/&s :at is ! mean+ ( x all2 & is l to a spectator :o compreh5ds ! /hetic significance ( t :i* takes place on ! /age ( a !atre1 & w\ld ga9 no?+ ess5tial if he 7 to see besides ! ma*9]y by means ( :i* ! *anges are effect$ on ! /age40 ,pr(essor ,c4 ,a4 ,/rong3 8,p]ception is a %ad[ ?r[n ^u ! m9d by a ?+-9-itself4 ,! %ad[ is ! symbol ( ! ?+2 &1 z %ad[s are s\lless & dead1 physical objects may seem s\lless & dead1 :ile ! reality symboliz$ is nev] s s\lful & alive4 ,consci\sness is reality4 ,! only exi/5ce ( :i* we c conceive is m5tal 9 its nature4 ,all exi/5ce = consci\sness is exi/5ce ( consci\sness4 ,! horse's %ad[ accompanies him1 b x does n help him to draw ! c>t4 ,! bra9-ev5t is simply ! m5tal /ate itself reg>d$ f ! po9t ( view ( ! p]ception40 ,ari/otle3 8,sub/ance is 9 its nature prior to relation0 !re c be no relation )\t ?+s to be relat$4 ,fi*te3 8,k1 j because x is k1 is n reality1--x comes n fir/1 b second40 ,veit*1 ,kn[+ & ,be+1 #baf1 #bag1 #bib1 #bic--8,?\ght c d no?+1 except z x is a synonym = ,?9k]4444 ,nei!r ! f9ite nor ! inf9ite consci\sness1 alone or toge!r1 c con/itute an object ext]nal1 or expla9 its exi/5ce4 ,! exi/5ce ( a ?+ logically prec$es ! p]ception ( x4 ,p]ception is n creation4 ,x is n ! ?9k+ t makes ! ego1 b ! ego t makes ! ?9k+40 ,se?1 ,hegelianism & ,p]sonality3 8,div9e ?\ghts presuppose a div9e ,be+4 ,god's ?\ghts d n con/itute ! real _w4 ,! real =ce does n lie 9 !m1--x lies 9 ! div9e ,be+1 z liv+1 active ,w40 ,"h 0 ! fundam5tal error ( ,hegel1 t he reg>d$ ! ,univ]se z m]e ,idea1 & gave little ?\ght to ! ,love & ! ,w t con/itute x4 ,see ,john ,fiske1 ,cosmic ,philosophy1 #a3ge2 #b3hj2 ,contemp4 ,rev41 ,oct4 #ahgb3 art4 on ,huxley2 ,l[ndes1 ,philos4 ,prim>y ,beliefs1 #aae-adc2 ,atwat] 7on ,f]ri]71 9 ,pr9ceton ,rev41 #aheg3beh1 #bhj2 ,c\s91 ,hi/4 ,philosophy1 #b3bci-cdc2 ,veit*'s ,hamilton1 7,blackwood's ,philos4 ,classics17 #agf1 #aia2 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,philosophy & ,religion1 #eh-gd4 ,to ?is view we make ! foll[+ objections3 #a4 ,its def9ition ( matt] z a 8p]man5t possibility ( s5sation0 contradicts our intuitive judgm5t t1 9 kn[+ ! ph5om5a ( matt]1 we h direct k ( sub/ance z und]ly+ ph5om5a1 z di/9ct f our s5sations1 & z ext]nal to ! m9d :i* exp]i5ces ^! s5sations4 ,b[ne1 ,metaphysics1 #dcb--8;,h[ ! possibility ( an odor & a flavor c be ! cause ( ! yell[ color ( an orange is probably unkn[able1 except to a m9d t c see t two & two may make five40 ,see ,iv]a*'s ,philosophy ( ,sp5c] ,exam9$1 9 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #e3 no4 #bi4 ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy1 #a3ajb-aab--8;,if ext]nal impressions are telegraph$ to ! bra91 intellig5ce mu/ receive ! message at ! beg9n+ z well z deliv] x at ! end4444 ,x is ! ext]nal object :i* gives ! possibility1 n ! possibility :i* gives ! ext]nal object4 ,! m9d _c make bo? its cognita & its cognitio4 ,x _c disp5se ) /&+-gr\nd = its own feet1 or ) atmosph]e = its own w+s40 ,pr(essor ,*>les ,a4 ,/rong3 8,kant held to ?+s-9-!mselves back ( physical ph5om5a1 z well z to ?+s-9-!mselves back ( m5tal ph5om5a2 he ?\ght ?+s-9-!mselves back ( physical might be id5tical ) ?+s-9-!mselves back ( m5tal ph5om5a4 ,& s9ce m5tal ph5om5a1 on ?is !ory1 are n specim5s ( reality1 & reality manife/s itself indiff]5tly ?r\gh !m & ?r\gh physical ph5om5a1 he naturally conclud$ t we h no gr\nd = suppos+ reality to be l ei!r--t we mu/ conceive ( x z #8w$] ,mat]ie no* e9 d5k5d ,wes5'--#8nei!r matt] nor a ?9k+ be+'--a !ory ( ! ,unkn[able4 ,w\ld t x _h be5 also ! ,un?9kable & ! ,unm5tionable60 ,ralph ,waldo ,em]son 0 a subjective ideali/2 b1 :5 call$ to inspect a f>m]'s load ( wood1 he said to 8 company3 8,excuse me a mom5t1 my fri5ds2 we h to att5d to ^! matt]s1 j z if !y 7 real40 ,see ,miv>t1 ,on ,tru?1 #ga-ada4 #b4 ,its def9ition ( m9d z a 8s]ies ( feel+s aw>e ( itself0 contradicts our intuitive judgm5t t1 9 kn[+ ! ph5om5a ( m9d1 we h direct k ( a spiritual sub/ance ( :i* ^! ph5om5a are manife/ations1 :i* reta9s its id5tity indep5d5tly ( our consci\sness1 & :i*1 9 its kn[+1 in/ead ( be+ ! passive recipi5t ( impressions f )\t1 always acts f )9 by a p[] ( its own4 ,james1 ,psy*ology1 #a3bbf--8;,x seems z if ! elem5t>y psy*ic fact 7 n ?\ght1 or ?is ?\ght1 or t ?\ght1 b my ?\ght1 e ?\ght be+ own$4 ,! univ]sal consci\s fact is n #8feel+s & ?\ghts exi/1' b #8,i ?9k1' & #8,i feel4' 0 ,pr(essor ,james is compell$ to say ?is1 ev5 ?\gh he beg9s 8 ,psy*ology )\t insi/+ ^u ! exi/5ce ( a s\l4 ,hamilton's ,reid1 #ddc--8,%all ,i ?9k t ?\ght c /& by itself8 or t ideas c feel pleasure or pa980 ,r4 ,t4 ,smi?1 ,man's ,k1 #dd--8,we say #8my notions & my passions1' & :5 we use ^! phrases we imply t our c5tral self is felt to be some?+ diff]5t f ! notions or passions :i* belong to x or *>act]ize x = a "t40 ,li*t5b]g3 8,we %\ld say1 #8,x ?9ks2' j z we say1 #8,x light5s1' or #8,x ra9s4' ,9 say+ #8,cogito1' ! philosoph] goes too f> if he translates x1 #8,i ?9k4' 0 ,are ! faculties1 !n1 an army )\t a g5]al1 or an eng9e )\t a driv]8 ,9 t case we %\ld n h s5sations1--we %\ld only be s5sations4 ,pr(essor ,c4 ,a4 ,/rong3 8,i h k ( o!r m9ds4 ,?is non-empirical k--transc5d5t k ( ?+s-9-!mselves1 d]iv$ nei!r f exp]i5ce nor reason+1 & assum+ t l consequ5ts 7intellig5t movem5ts7 mu/ h l antec$5ts 7?\ghts & feel+s71 & also assum+ in/9ctively t some?+ exi/s outside ( my own m9d--?is refutes ! po/-,kantian ph5om5alism4 ,p]ception & memory also involve transc5d5ce4 ,9 bo? ,i transc5d ! b\nds ( exp]i5ce1 z truly z 9 my k ( o!r m9ds4 ,9 memory ,i recognize a pa/1 z di/+ui%$ f ! pres5t4 ,9 p]ception ,i cognize a possibility ( o!r exp]i5ces l ! pres5t1 & ?is alone gives ! s5se ( p]man5ce & reality4 ,p]ception & memory refute ph5om5alism4 ,?+s-9-!mselves mu/ be assum$ 9 ord] to fill ! gaps betwe5 individual m9ds1 & to give coh]5ce & intelligibility to ! univ]se1 & s to avoid pluralism4 ,if matt] c influ5ce & ev5 ext+ui% our m9ds1 x mu/ h "s =ce ( its own1 "s exi/5ce 9 itself4 ,if consci\sness is an evolution>y product1 x mu/ h aris5 f simpl] m5tal facts4 ,b ^! simpl] m5tal facts are only ano!r "n = ?+s-9-!mselves4 ,a deep pr]ational in/9ct compels u to recognize !m1 = !y _c be logically demon/rat$4 ,we mu/ assume !m 9 ord] to give cont9uity & intelligibility to our conceptions ( ! univ]se40 ,see1 on ,ba9's ,c]ebral ,psy*ology1 ,m>t9eau's ,essays1 #a3bfe4 ,on ! physiological me?od ( m5tal philosophy1 see ,talbot1 9 ,bap4 ,qu>41 #ahga3a2 ,b[51 9 ,pr9ceton ,rev41 ,m>*1 #ahgh3dbc-dej2 ,murray1 ,psy*ology1 #bgi-bhg4 #c4 ,9 s f> z ?is !ory reg>ds m9d z ! obv]se side ( matt]1 or z a lat] & high] developm5t f matt]1 ! m]e ref]5ce ( bo? m9d & matt] to an und]ly+ =ce does n save ! !ory f any ( ! difficulties ( pure mat]ialism already m5tion$2 s9ce 9 ?is case1 equally ) t1 =ce is reg>d$ z purely physical1 & ! priority ( _s is d5i$4 ,h]b]t ,sp5c]1 ,psy*ology1 quot$ by ,fiske1 ,cosmic ,philosophy1 #b3hj--8,m9d & n]v\s action are ! subjective & objective faces ( ! same ?+4 ,yet we rema9 utt]ly incapable ( see+1 or ev5 ( imag9+1 h[ ! two are relat$4 ,m9d /ill cont9ues to u a some?+ )\t k9%ip to o!r ?+s40 ,ow51 ,anatomy ( ,v]tebrates1 quot$ by ,talbot1 ,bap4 ,qu>41 ,jan4 #ahga3e--8;,all t ,i "k ( matt] & m9d 9 !mselves is t ! =m] is an ext]nal c5tre ( =ce1 & ! latt] an int]nal c5tre ( =ce40 ,new ,engl&]1 ,sept4 #ahhc3fcf--8;,if ! atom be a m]e c5tre ( =ce & n a real ?+ 9 itself1 !n ! atom is a sup]s5sual ess5ce1 an immat]ial be+4 ,to make immat]ial matt] ! s\rce ( consci\s m9d is to make matt] z wond]ful z an immortal s\l or a p]sonal ,creator40 ,see ,new ,engl&]1 ,july1 #ahge3ecb-ece2 ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy1 #ajb-acj1 & ,relig4 & ,mod4 ,mat]ialism1 #be--8;,if x takes m9d to con/rue ! univ]se1 h[ c ! negation ( m9d con/itute x80 ,david ,j4 ,hill1 9 8 ,g5etic ,philosophy1 #bjj1 #bja1 seems to d5y t ?\ght prec$es =ce1 or t =ce prec$es ?\ght3 8,objects1 or ?+s 9 ! ext]nal _w1 may be elem5ts ( a ?\ght-process 9 a cosmic subject1 )\t !mselves be+ consci\s4444 ,a true analysis & a rational g5esis require ! equal recognition ( bo? ! objective & ! subjective elem5ts ( exp]i5ce1 )\t priority 9 "t1 sep>ation 9 space or disruption ( be+4 ,s f> z our m9ds c p5etrate reality1 z disclos$ 9 ! activities ( ?\ght1 we are ev]y:]e confront$ ) a ,dynamic ,reason40 ,9 ,dr4 ,hill's acc\nt ( ! g5esis ( ! univ]se1 h[ev]1 ! unconsci\s comes fir/1 & f x ! consci\s seems to be d]iv$4 ,consci\sness ( ! object is only ! obv]se side ( ! object ( consci\sness4 ,?is is1 z ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy1 #a3cda1 rem>ks1 8to take ! sea on bo>d ! boat40 ,we greatly pref] ! view ( ,lotze1 #b3fda--8,?+s are acts ( ! ,inf9ite wr\ght )9 m9ds alone1 or /ates :i* ! ,inf9ite exp]i5ces n[h]e b 9 m9ds4444 ,?+s & ev5ts are ! sum ( ^? actions :i* ! highe/ ,pr9ciple p]=ms 9 all spirits s uni=mly & coh]5tly1 t to ^! spirits !re mu/ seem to be a _w ( sub/antial & effici5t ?+s exi/+ 9 space outside !mselves40 ,! data f :i* we draw our inf]5ces z to ! nature ( ! ext]nal _w be+ m5tal & spiritual1 x is m rational to attribute to t _w a spiritual reality ?an a k9d ( reality ( :i* our exp]i5ce kn[s no?+4 ,see also ,s*urman1 ,belief 9 ,god1 #bjh1 #bbe4 #d4 ,9 s f> z ?is !ory holds ! und]ly+ =ce ( :i* matt] & m9d are manife/ations to be 9 any s5se intellig5t or volunt>y1 x r5d]s necess>y ! assumption t !re is an intellig5t & volunt>y ,be+ :o ex]ts ?is =ce4 ,s5sations & ideas1 moreov]1 are explicable only z manife/ations ( ,m9d4 ,_m rec5t ,*ri/ian ?9k]s1 z ,murphy1 ,sci5tific ,bases ( ,fai?1 #ac-ae1 #bi-cf1 #db-eb1 w\ld def9e m9d z a function ( matt]1 matt] z a function ( =ce1 =ce z a function ( w1 & !re=e z ! p[] ( an omnipres5t & p]sonal ,god4 ,all =ce1 except t ( man's free w1 is ! w ( ,god4 ,s ,h]s*el1 ,lectures1 #dfj2 ,argyll1 ,reign ( ,law1 #aba-abg2 ,wallace on ,nat4 ,selection1 #cfc-cga2 ,m>t9eau1 ,essays1 #a3fc1 #aba1 #ade1 #bfe2 ,b[51 ,metaph4 & ,e?ics1 #adf-afb4 ,^! writ]s are l$ to _! conclusion 9 l>ge "p by ! consid]ations t no?+ dead c be a prop] cause2 t w is ! only cause ( :i* we h imm$iate k2 t ! =ces ( nature are intelligible only :5 !y are reg>d$ z ex]tions ( w4 ,matt]1 !re=e1 is simply c5tres ( =ce--! regul> &1 z x 71 automatic expression ( ,god's m9d & w4 ,second causes 9 nature are only second>y activities ( ! great ,fir/ ,cause4 ,?is view is held also by ,b[ne1 9 8 ,metaphysics4 ,he reg>ds only p]sonality z real4 ,matt] is ph5om5al1 al?\gh x is an activity ( ! div9e w outside ( u4 ,b[ne's ph5om5alism is !re=e an objective idealism1 greatly pref]able to t ( ,b]keley :o held to ,god's en]giz+ inde$1 b only )9 ! s\l4 ,?is idealism ( ,b[ne is n pan!ism1 = x holds t1 :ile !re are no second causes 9 nature1 man is a second cause1 ) a p]sonality di/9ct f t ( ,god1 & lift$ above nature by 8 p[]s ( free w4 ,royce1 h[ev]1 9 8 ,religi\s ,aspect ( ,philosophy1 & 9 8 ,! ,_w & ! ,individual1 makes man's consci\sness a "p or aspect ( a univ]sal consci\sness1 & s1 in/ead ( mak+ ,god come to consci\sness 9 man1 makes man come to consci\sness 9 ,god4 ,:ile ?is s*eme seems1 9 "o view1 to save ,god's p]sonality1 x may be d\bt$ :e!r x equally gu>antees man's p]sonality or leaves room = man's fre$om1 responsibility1 s9 & guilt4 ,b[ne1 ,philos4 ,!ism1 #age--8 #8,univ]sal reason' is a class-t]m :i* d5otes no possible exi/5ce1 & :i* has reality only 9 ! specific exi/5ces f :i* x is ab/ract$40 ,b[ne claims t ! imp]sonal f9ite has only su* o!rness z a ?\ght or act has to its subject4 ,!re is no sub/antial exi/5ce except 9 p]sons4 ,se?1 ,hegelianism & ,p]sonality3 8,neo-,kantianism erects into a ,god ! m]e =m ( self-consci\sness 9 g5]al1 t is1 conf\nds consci\sness b]haupt ) a univ]sal consci\sness40 ,b[ne1 ,!ory ( ,?\ght & ,k1 #cah-cdc1 esp4 #cbh--8;,is !re any?+ 9 exi/5ce b myself8 ,yes4 ,to escape solipsism ,i mu/ admit at lea/ o!r p]sons4 ,does ! _w ( app>5t objects exi/ = me only8 ,no2 x exi/s = o!rs also1 s t we live 9 a common _w4 ,does ?is common _w consi/ 9 any?+ m ?an a simil>ity ( impressions 9 f9ite m9ds1 s t ! _w ap>t f ^! is no?+8 ,?is view _c be disprov$1 b x accords s ill ) ! impression ( our total exp]i5ce t x is practically impossible4 ,is !n ! _w ( ?+s a cont9u\s exi/5ce ( "s k9d indep5d5t ( f9ite ?\ght & consci\sness8 ,?is claim _c be demon/rat$1 b x is ! only view t does n involve insup]able difficulties4 ,:at is ! nature & :]e is ! place ( ?is cosmic exi/5ce8 ,t is ! "q betwe5 ,realism & ,idealism4 ,realism views ?+s z exi/+ 9 a real space1 & z true ontological realities4 ,idealism views bo? !m & ! space 9 :i* !y are suppos$ to be exi/+ z exi/+ only 9 & = a cosmic ,intellig5ce1 & ap>t f :i* !y are absurd & contradictory4 ,?+s are indep5d5t ( our ?\ght1 b n indep5d5t ( all ?\ght1 9 a lumpi% mat]iality :i* is ! anti!sis & negation ( consci\sness40 ,see also ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy1 #a3bad-bcj1 #cda4 ,= advocacy ( ! sub/antive exi/5ce ( second causes1 see ,port]1 ,hum4 ,intellect1 #ehb-ehh2 ,hodge1 ,sy/4 ,!ol41 #a3eif2 ,ald51 ,philosophy1 #dh-hj2 ,hodgson1 ,"t & ,space1 #adi-bah2 ,a4 ,j4 ,balf\r1 9 ,m9d1 ,oct4 #ahic3 #dcj4 ,,iii4 ,ideali/ic ,pan!ism4 ,pan!ism is t me?od ( ?\ght :i* conceives ( ! univ]se z ! developm5t ( "o intellig5t & volunt>y1 yet imp]sonal1 sub/ance1 :i* rea*es consci\sness only 9 man4 ,x !re=e id5tifies ,god1 n ) ea* individual object 9 ! univ]se1 b ) ! totality ( ?+s4 ,! curr5t ,pan!ism ( our day is ideali/ic4 ,! elem5ts ( tru? 9 ,pan!ism are ! intellig5ce & volunt>9ess ( ,god1 & 8 imman5ce 9 ! univ]se2 its error lies 9 d5y+ ,god's p]sonality & transc5d5ce4 ,pan!ism d5ies ! real exi/5ce ( ! f9ite1 at ! same "t t x deprives ! ,inf9ite ( self-consci\sness & fre$om4 ,see ,hunt1 ,hi/ory ( ,pan!ism2 ,mann+1 ,half-tru?s & ! ,tru?2 ,bayne1 ,*ri/ian ,life1 ,social & ,individual1 #ba-ec2 ,hutton1 on ,popul> ,pan!ism1 9 ,essays1 #a3ee-gf--8,! pan!i/'s #8,i believe 9 ,god'1 is a contradiction4 ,he says3 #8,i p]ceive ! ext]nal z diff]5t f myself2 b on fur!r reflection1 ,i p]ceive t ?is ext]nal 0 itself ! p]cipi5t ag5cy4' ,s ! wor%ip$ is really ! wor%ip] aft] all40 ,h>ris1 ,philosophical ,basis ( ,!ism1 #agc--8,man is a bottle ( ! ocean's wat]1 9 ! ocean1 tempor>ily di/+ui%able by its limitation )9 ! bottle1 b lo/ aga9 9 ! ocean1 s soon z ^! fragile limits are brok540 ,m>t9eau1 ,types1 #a3bc--,m]e imman5cy excludes ,!ism2 transc5d5cy leaves x /ill possible2 #baa-bbe--,pan!ism decl>es t 8!re is no?+ b ,god2 he is n only sole cause b entire effect2 he is all 9 all40 ,sp9oza has be5 falsely call$ 8! ,god-intoxicat$ man40 8,sp9oza1 on ! contr>y1 translat$ ,god into ! univ]se2 x 0 ,malebran*e :o transfigur$ ! univ]se into ,god40 ,! lat] ,brahmanism is pan!i/ic4 ,r[l& ,williams1 ,*ri/ianity & ,h9duism1 quot$ 9 ,mozley on ,miracles1 #bhd--8;,9 ! f9al /ate p]sonality vani%es4 ,y w n1 says ! ,brahman1 accept ! t]m #8void' z an adequate description ( ! my/]i\s nature ( ! s\l1 b y w cle>ly appreh5d s\l1 9 ! f9al /ate1 to be unse5 & ungrasp$ be+1 ?\ght1 k1 joy--no o!r ?an v ,god40 ,fl9t1 ,!ism1 #fi--8,:]e ! w is )\t en]gy1 & re/ is long$ = z ! end ( exi/5ce1 z among ! ,h9dus1 !re is m>k$ inability to ?9k ( ,god z cause or w1 & con/ant invet]ate t5d5cy to pan!ism40 ,hegel d5ies ,god's transc5d5ce3 8,god is n a _s beyond ! />s2 he is _s 9 all _s02 :i* means t ,god1 ! imp]sonal & unconsci\s ,absolute1 comes to consci\sness only 9 man4 ,if ! et]nal sy/em ( ab/ract ?\ghts 7 itself consci\s1 f9ite consci\sness w\ld disappe>2 h5ce ! alt]native is ei!r no ,god1 or no man4 ,/irl+3 8,! ,idea1 s conceiv$1 is a bl9d1 dumb1 invisible idol1 & ! !ory is ! mo/ hopeless !ory t has ev] be5 pres5t$ to humanity40 ,x is practical autolatry1 or self-deification4 ,! _w is r$uc$ to a m]e process ( logic2 ?\ght ?9ks2 !re is ?\ght )\t a ?9k]4 ,to ?is doctr9e ( ,hegel we may well oppose ! rem>ks ( ,lotze3 8,we _c make m9d ! equival5t ( ! inf9itive to ?9k1--we feel t x mu/ be t :i* ?9ks2 ! ess5ce ( ?+s _c be ei!r exi/5ce or activity1--x mu/ be t :i* exi/s & t :i* acts4 ,?9k+ means no?+1 if x is n ! ?9k+ ( a ?9k]2 act+ & work+ mean no?+1 if we leave out ! conception ( a subject di/+ui%able f !m & f :i* !y proce$40 ,to ,hegel1 ,be+ is ,?\ght2 to ,sp9oza1 ,be+ has ,?\ght ,ext5sion2 ! tru? seems to be t ,be+ has ,?\ght ,w1 & may reveal itself 9 ,ext5sion & ,evolution 7,creation74 ,by o!r philosoph]s1 h[ev]1 ,hegel is o!rwise int]pret$4 ,pr(4 ,h4 ,jones1 9 ,m9d1 ,july1 #ahic3 #bhi-cjf1 claims t ,hegel's fundam5tal ,idea is n ,?\ght1 b ,?9k+3 8,! univ]se to him 0 n a sy/em ( ?\ghts1 b a ?9k+ reality1 manife/$ mo/ fully 9 man4444 ,! fundam5tal reality is ! univ]sal intellig5ce ^: op]ation we %\ld seek to detect 9 all ?+s4 ,all reality is ultimately explicable z ,_s1 or ,intellig5ce1--h5ce our ontology mu/ be a ,logic1 & ! laws ( ?+s mu/ be laws ( ?9k+40 ,/]rett1 9 l mann]1 9 8 ,/udies 9 ,hegel's ,philosophy ( ,religion1 #ag1 quotes ,hegel's ,logic1 ,wallace's translation1 #hi1 #ia1 #bcf3 8,sp9oza's ,sub/ance is1 z x 71 a d>k1 %apeless abyss1 :i* dev\rs all def9ite cont5t z utt]ly null1 & produces f itself no?+ t has positive subsi/5ce 9 itself4444 ,god is ,sub/ance1--he is1 h[ev]1 no less ! ,absolute ,p]son40 ,?is is ess5tial to religion1 b ?is1 says ,hegel1 ,sp9oza nev] p]ceiv$3 8,ev]y?+ dep5ds ^u ! ,absolute ,tru? be+ p]ceiv$1 n m]ely z ,sub/ance1 b z ,subject40 ,god is self-consci\s & self-det]m9+ ,_s4 ,necessity is exclud$4 ,man is free & immortal4 ,m5 are n me*anical p>ts ( ,god1 nor d !y lose _! id5tity1 al?\gh !y f9d !mselves truly only 9 him4 ,) ?is e/imate ( ,hegel's sy/em1 ,caird1 ,erdmann & ,mul=d sub/antially agree4 ,?is is ,t5nyson's 8,high] ,pan!ism40 ,se?1 ,e?ical ,pr9ciples1 #ddj--8;,hegel conceiv$ ! sup]iority ( 8 sy/em to ,sp9ozism to lie 9 ! sub/itution ( ,subject = ,sub/ance4 ,! true ,absolute mu/ conta91 in/ead ( aboli%+1 relations2 ! true ,monism mu/ include1 in/ead ( exclud+1 ,pluralism4 ,a ,"o :i*1 l ,sp9oza's ,sub/ance1 or ! ,hegelian ,absolute1 does n enable u to ?9k ! ,_m1 _c be ! true ,"o--! unity ( ! ,manifold4444 ,s9ce evil exi/s1 ,s*op5hau] sub/itut$ = ,hegel's ,panlogism1 :i* ass]t$ ! id5tity ( ! rational & ! real1 a bl9d impulse ( life1--= absolute ,reason he sub/itut$ a reasonless ,w0--a sy/em ( practical pessimism4 ,alex&]1 ,!ories ( ,w1 #e--8,sp9oza recogniz$ no di/9ction betwe5 w & intellectual affirmation or d5ial40 ,john ,caird1 ,fund4 ,ideas ( ,*ri/ianity1 #a3ajg--8;,z !re is no reason 9 ! conception ( pure space :y any figures or =ms1 l9es1 surfaces1 solids1 %\ld arise 9 x1 s !re is no reason 9 ! pure colorless ab/raction ( ,inf9ite ,sub/ance :y any _w ( f9ite ?+s & be+s %\ld ev] come into exi/5ce4 ,x is ! grave ( all ?+s1 ! productive s\rce ( no?+40 ,hegel call$ ,s*ell+'s ,id5tity or ,absolute 8! inf9ite night 9 :i* all c[s are black0--an allusion to ,goe!'s ,fau/1 "p #b1 act #a1 :]e ! words are add$3 8& cats are gray40 ,al?\gh ,hegel's pref]5ce ( ! t]m ,subject1 in/ead ( ! t]m ,sub/ance1 has l$ _m to ma9ta9 t he believ$ 9 a p]sonality ( ,god di/9ct f t ( man1 8 ov]-emphasis ( ! ,idea1 & 8 comp>ative ignor+ ( ! elem5ts ( ,love & ,w1 leave x /ill d\btful :e!r 8 ,idea 0 any?+ m ?an unconsci\s & imp]sonal intellig5ce--less mat]iali/ic ?an t ( ,sp9oza inde$1 yet op5 to _m ( ! same objections4 ,we object to ?is sy/em z foll[s3 #a4 ,its idea ( ,god is self-contradictory1 s9ce x makes him inf9ite1 yet consi/+ only ( ! f9ite2 absolute1 yet exi/+ 9 necess>y relation to ! univ]se2 supreme1 yet %ut up to a process ( self-evolution & dep5d5t = self-consci\sness on man2 )\t self-det]m9ation1 yet ! cause ( all t is4 ,saisset1 ,pan!ism1 #adh--8;,an imp]fect ,god1 yet p]fection aris+ f imp]fection40 ,%$d1 ,hi/4 ,doctr9e1 #a3ac--8,pan!ism applies to ,god a pr9ciple ( gr[? & imp]fection1 :i* belongs only to ! f9ite40 ,cald]wood1 ,moral ,philos41 #bde--8;,its fir/ requisite is mom5t1 or movem5t1 :i* x assumes1 b does n acc\nt =40 ,c>o's s>casm applies "h3 8,y\r ,god is n yet made--he is 9 process ( manufacture40 ,see ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 ,fai? & ,philosophy1 #be4 ,pan!ism is practical a!ism1 = imp]sonal _s is only bl9d & necess>y =ce4 ,angelus ,silesius3 8,wir bet5 #8,es ges*eh1 me9 ,h]r und ,gott1 de9 ,wille'2 ,und sieh'1 ,er hat ni*t ,w'1--,er i/ e9 ew'ge ,/ille0--:i* ,max ,mll] translates z foll[s3 8,we pray1 #8,o ,"l our ,god1 ,d ?\ ?y holy ,w'2 & see6 ,god has no w2 ,he is at peace & /ill40 ,angelus ,silesius consi/5tly makes ,god dep5d5t = self-consci\sness on man3 8,i "k t ,god _c live ,an in/ant )\t me2 ,he mu/ give up ! gho/1 ,if ,i %\ld cease to be40 ,se?1 ,hegelianism & ,p]sonality3 8,hegelianism de/roys bo? ,god & man4 ,x r$uces man to an object ( ! univ]sal ,?9k]1 & leaves ?is univ]sal ,?9k] )\t any true p]sonality40 ,pan!ism is a game ( solitaire1 9 :i* ,god plays bo? sides4 #b4 ,its assum$ unity ( sub/ance is n only )\t pro(1 b x directly contradicts our intuitive judgm5ts4 ,^! te/ify t we are n p>ts & p>ticles ( ,god1 b di/9ct p]sonal subsi/5ces4 ,m>t9eau1 ,essays1 #a3aeh--8;,ev5 = imman5cy1 !re mu/ be some?+ :]e9 to dwell1 & = life1 some?+ :]eon to act40 ,_m sy/ems ( monism contradict consci\sness2 !y conf\nd h>mony betwe5 two ) absorption 9 "o4 8,9 ,scripture we nev] f9d ! univ]se call$ 1 = ?is sugge/s ! idea ( a self-conta9$ unity3 we h ev]y:]e in/ead40 ,! ,bible recognizes ! elem5t ( tru? 9 pan!ism--,god is 8?r\gh all02 also ! elem5t ( tru? 9 my/icism--,god is 89 y all02 b x adds ! elem5t ( transc5d5ce :i* bo? ^! fail to recognize--,god is 8above all0 7,eph4 #d3f74 ,see ,fi%]1 ,essays on ,sup]nat4 ,orig4 ( ,*ri/ianity1 #eci4 ,g4 ,d4 ,b4 ,pepp]3 8,he :o is ov] all & 9 all is yet di/9ct f all4 ,if "o is ov] a ?+1 he is n t v ?+ :i* he is ov]4 ,if "o is 9 some?+1 he mu/ be di/9ct f t some?+4 ,& s ! univ]se1 ov] :i* & 9 :i* ,god is1 mu/ be ?\ght ( z some?+ di/9ct f ,god4 ,! creation _c be id5tical ) ,god1 or a m]e =m ( ,god40 ,we add1 h[ev]1 t x may be a manife/ation ( ,god & dep5d5t ^u ,god1 z our ?\ghts & acts are manife/ations ( our m9d & w & dep5d5t ^u our m9d & w1 yet are n !mselves our m9d & w4 ,pope wrote3 8,all are b p>ts ( "o /up5d\s :ole1 ,^: body nature is & ,god ! s\l40 ,b ,case1 ,physical ,realism1 #aic1 replies3 8,n s4 ,nature is to ,god z works are to a man2 & z man's works are n 8 body1 s nei!r is nature ! body ( ,god40 ,mat!w ,arnold1 ,on ,he9e's ,grave3 8,:at are we all b a mood1 ,a s+le mood ( ! life ,( ! ,be+ 9 :om we exi/1 ,:o alone is all ?+s 9 "o80 ,hovey1 ,/udies1 #ea--8,scripture recognizes ! elem5t ( tru? 9 pan!ism1 b x also tea*es ! exi/5ce ( a _w ( ?+s1 animate & inanimate1 9 di/9ction f ,god4 ,x repres5ts m5 z prone to wor%ip ! creature m ?an ! ,creator4 ,x describes !m z s9n]s wor?y ( dea? 444 moral ag5ts4444 ,x no m ?9ks ( m5 z be+ lit]ally p>ts ( ,god1 ?an x ?9ks ( *ildr5 z be+ p>ts ( _! p>5ts1 or subjects z be+ p>ts ( _! k+40 ,a4 ,j4 ,f4 ,behr5ds3 8,! true doctr9e lies betwe5 ! two extremes ( a crass dualism :i* makes ,god & ! _w two self-conta9$ entities1 & a sub/antial monism 9 :i* ! univ]se has only a ph5om5al exi/5ce4 ,!re is no id5tity ( sub/ance nor division ( ! div9e sub/ance4 ,! univ]se is et]nally dep5d5t1 ! product ( ! div9e ,^w1 n simply manufactur$4 ,creation is prim>ily a spiritual act40 ,pr(4 ,george ,m4 ,=bes3 8,matt] exi/s 9 subord9ate dep5d5ce ^u ,god2 _s 9 cord9ate dep5d5ce ^u ,god4 ,! body ( ,*ri/ 0 ,*ri/ ext]naliz$1 made manife/ to s5se-p]ception4 ,9 appreh5d+ matt]1 ,i am appreh5d+ ! m9d & w ( ,god4 ,?is is ! highe/ sort ( reality4 ,nei!r matt] nor f9ite spirits1 !n1 are m]e ph5om5a40 #c4 ,x assigns no suffici5t cause = t fact ( ! univ]se :i* is highe/ 9 rank1 & !re=e mo/ ne$s explanation1 namely1 ! exi/5ce ( p]sonal intellig5ces4 ,a sub/ance :i* is itself unconsci\s1 & "u ! law ( necessity1 _c produce be+s :o are self-consci\s & free4 ,gess1 ,f\ndations ( our ,fai?1 #cf--8;,animal in/9ct1 & ! _s ( a nation work+ out its language1 might furni% analogies1 if !y produc$ p]sonalities z _! result1 b n o!rwise4 ,nor 7 ^! t5d5cies self-orig9at$1 b receiv$ f an ext]nal s\rce40 ,mc,cosh1 ,intuitions1 #bae1 #cic1 & ,*ri/ianity & ,positivism1 #ahj4 ,se?1 ,fre$om z an ,e?ical ,po/ulate1 #dg--8;,if man is an #8imp]ium 9 imp]io1' n a p]son1 b only an aspect or expression ( ! univ]se or ,god1 !n he _c be free4 ,man may be dep]sonaliz$ ei!r into nature or into ,god4 ,?r\gh ! conception ( our own p]sonality we rea* t ( ,god4 ,to resolve our p]sonality into t ( ,god w\ld be to negate ! div9e greatness itself by invalidat+ ! conception ?r\gh :i* x 0 rea*$40 ,bradley1 ,appe>ance & ,reality1 #eea1 is m ambigu\s3 8,! positive relation ( e appe>ance z an adjective to ,reality2 & ! pres5ce ( ,reality among its appe>ances 9 diff]5t degrees & ) div]se values2 ?is d\ble tru? we h f\nd to be ! c5tre ( philosophy40 ,he prote/s aga9/ bo? 8an empty transc5d5ce0 & 8a %all[ pan!ism40 ,hegelian imman5ce & k1 he ass]ts1 id5tifi$ ,god & man4 ,b ,god is m ?an man or man's ?\ght4 ,he is _s & life--be/ und]/ood f ! human self1 ) its ?\ghts1 feel+s1 volitions4 ,imman5ce ne$s to be qualifi$ by transc5d5ce4 8,god is n ,god till he has become all-9-all1 & a ,god :i* is all-9-all is n ! ,god ( religion4 ,god is an aspect1 & t mu/ mean b an appe>ance ( ! ,absolute40 ,bradley's ,absolute1 !re=e1 is n s mu* p]sonal z sup]-p]sonal2 to :i* we reply ) ,jackson1 ,james ,m>t9eau1 #daf--8;,high] ?an p]sonality is l[]2 beyond x is regression f its height4 ,f ! equator we may travel nor?w>d1 ga9+ ev] high] & high] latitudes2 b1 if ev] ! pole is rea*$1 press+ on f !nce w be desc5d+ into l[] latitudes1 n ga9+ high]4444 ,d ,i say1 ,i am a pan!i/8 ,!n1 ipso facto1 ,i d5y pan!ism2 =1 9 ! v ass]tion ( ! ,ego1 ,i imply all else z objective to me40 #d4 ,x !re=e contradicts ! affirmations ( our moral & religi\s natures by d5y+ man's fre$om & responsibility2 by mak+ ,god to include 9 himself all evil z well z all good2 & by preclud+ all pray]1 wor%ip1 & hope ( immortality4 ,consci5ce is ! et]nal witness aga9/ pan!ism4 ,consci5ce witnesses to our fre$om & responsibility1 & decl>es t moral di/9ctions are n illusory4 ,r5\f1 ,hibb]t ,lect41 #bcd--8;,x is only out ( condesc5sion to popul> language t pan!i/ic sy/ems c recognize ! notions ( "r & wrong1 ( iniquity & s94 ,if ev]y?+ really emanates f ,god1 !re c be no su* ?+ z s94 ,& ! able/ philosoph]s :o h be5 l$ to pan!i/ic views h va9ly endeavor$ to h>monize ^! views ) :at we und]/& by ! notion ( s9 or moral evil4 ,! great sy/ematic "w ( ,sp9oza is entitl$ ',e?ica'2 b = real e?ics we might z pr(itably consult ! ,elem5ts ( ,euclid40 ,hodge1 ,sy/em4 ,!ology1 #a3bii-ccj--8,pan!ism is fatali/ic4 ,on ?is !ory1 duty pleasure2 "r might2 s9 good 9 ! mak+4 ,satan1 z well z ,gabriel1 is a self-developm5t ( ,god4 ,! practical effects ( pan!ism ^u popul> morals & life1 :]ev] x has prevail$1 z 9 ,buddhi/ ,india & ,*9a1 demon/rate its falsehood40 ,see also ,dove1 ,logic ( ! ,*ri/ian ,fai?1 #aah2 ,murphy1 ,sci5tific ,bases ( ,fai?1 #bjb2 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,oct4 #ahfg3fjc-fae2 ,dix1 ,pan!ism1 ,introd41 #ab4 ,on ! fact ( s9 z refut+ ! pan!i/ic !ory1 see ,bu%nell1 ,nature & ! ,sup]nat41 #adj-afd4 ,wordswor?3 8,look up to heav56 ! indu/ri\s sun ,already half 8 c\rse ha? run2 ,he _c halt or g a/ray2 ,b our immortal spirits may40 ,presid5t ,john ,h4 ,h>ris2 8,y nev] ask a cyclone's op9ion ( ! t5 comm&m5ts40 ,b[ne1 ,philos4 ( ,!ism1 #bde--8,pan!ism makes man an automaton4 ,b h[ c an automaton h duties80 ,pr9ciples ( ,e?ics1 #ah--8;,e?ics is def9$ z ! sci5ce ( conduct1 & ! conv5tions ( language are reli$ ^u to cov] up ! fact t !re is no #8conduct' 9 ! case4 ,if man be a prop] automaton1 we might z well speak ( ! conduct ( ! w9ds z ( human conduct2 & a treatise on planet>y motions is z truly ! e?ics ( ! sol> sy/em z a treatise on human movem5ts is ! e?ics ( man40 ,= lack ( a cle> recognition ( p]sonality1 ei!r human or div9e1 ,hegel's ,e?ics is devoid ( all spiritual n\ri%m5t1--8 8,re*tsphilosophie0 has be5 call$ 8a repa/ ( bran40 ,yet ,pr(essor ,jones1 9 ,m9d1 ,july1 #ahic3cjd1 tells u t ,hegel's task 0 8to discov] :at conception ( ! s+le pr9ciple or fundam5tal unity :i* alone is1 is adequate to ! diff]5ces :i* x c>ries )9 x4 #8,be+1' he f\nd1 leaves no room = diff]5ces1--x is ov]p[]$ by !m4444 ,he f\nd t ! ,reality c exi/ only z absolute ,self-consci\sness1 z a ,_s1 :o is univ]sal1 & :o kn[s himself 9 all ?+s4 ,9 all ?is he is deal+1 n simply ) ?\ghts1 b ) ,reality40 ,pr(4 ,jones's v9dication ( ,hegel1 h[ev]1 /ill leaves x undecid$ :e!r t philosoph] reg>d$ ! div9e self-consci\sness z di/9ct f t ( f9ite be+s1 or z simply inclusive ( !irs4 ,see ,john ,caird1 ,fund4 ,ideas ( ,*ri/ianity1 #a3aji4 #e4 ,our intuitive conviction ( ! exi/5ce ( a ,god ( absolute p]fection compels u to conceive ( ,god z possess$ ( e highe/ quality & attribute ( m51 & !re=e1 especially1 ( t :i* con/itutes ! *ief dignity ( ! human _s1 its p]sonality4 ,diman1 ,!i/ic ,argum5t1 #cbh--8,we h no "r to repres5t ! supreme ,cause z inf]ior to ourselves1 yet we d ?is :5 we describe x "u phrases d]iv$ f physical causation40 ,miv>t1 ,lessons f ,nature1 #cea--8,we _c conceive ( any?+ z imp]sonal1 yet ( high] nature ?an our own1--any be+ t has n k & w mu/ be indef9itely inf]ior to "o :o has !m40 ,lotze holds truly1 n t ,god is supra-p]sonal1 b t man is infra-p]sonal1 see+ t 9 ! inf9ite ,be+ alone is self-subsi/5ce1 & !re=e p]fect p]sonality4 ,knight1 ,essays 9 ,philosophy1 #bbd--8,! radical feature ( p]sonality is ! survival ( a p]man5t self1 "u all ! fleet+ or decidu\s phases ( exp]i5ce2 9 o!r words1 ! p]sonal id5tity t is involv$ 9 ! ass]tion #8,i am4'444 ,is limitation a necess>y adjunct ( t notion80 ,se?1 ,hegelianism3 8,z 9 u !re is m = ourselves ?an = o!rs1 s 9 ,god !re is m ( ?\ght = himself ?an he manife/s to u4 ,hegel's doctr9e is t ( imman5ce )\t transc5d5ce40 ,he9ri* ,he9e 0 a pupil & intimate fri5d ( ,hegel4 ,he says3 8,i 0 "y & pr\d1 & x pleas$ my va9-glory :5 ,i le>n$ f ,hegel t ! true ,god 0 n1 z my gr&mo!r believ$1 ! ,god :o liv$ 9 heav51 b 0 r myself ^u ! e>?40 ,john ,fiske1 ,idea ( ,god1 xvi--8,s9ce our notion ( =ce is purely a g5]alization f our subjective s5sations ( ov]com+ resi/ance1 !re is sc>cely less an?ropomorphism 9 ! phrase #8,inf9ite ,p[]' ?an 9 ! phrase #8,inf9ite ,p]son4' ,we mu/ symbolize ,deity 9 "s =m t has mean+ to u2 we _c symbolize x z physical2 we are b\nd to symbolize x z psy*ical4 ,h5ce we may say1 ,god is ,_s4 ,?is implies ,god's p]sonality40 #f4 ,its objection to ! div9e p]sonality1 t ov] aga9/ ! ,inf9ite !re c be 9 et]nity pa/ no non-ego to call =? self-consci\sness1 is refut$ by consid]+ t ev5 man's cognition ( ! non-ego logically presupposes k ( ! ego1 f :i* ! non-ego is di/+ui%$2 t1 9 an absolute m9d1 self-consci\sness _c be condition$1 z 9 ! case ( f9ite m9d1 ^u contact ) a n-self2 & t1 if ! di/+ui%+ ( self f a n-self 7 an ess5tial condition ( div9e self-consci\sness1 ! et]nal p]sonal di/9ctions 9 ! div9e nature or ! et]nal /ates ( ! div9e m9d might furni% su* a condition4 ,pfleid]]1 ,die ,religion1 #a3afc1 #aij sq4--8,p]sonal self-consci\sness is n prim>ily a di/+ui%+ ( ! ego f ! non-ego1 b r a di/+ui%+ ( itself f itself1 i4 e41 ( ! unity ( ! self f ! plurality ( its cont5ts4444 ,be=e ! s\l di/+ui%es self f ! n-self1 x mu/ "k self--else x c\ld n see ! di/9ction4 ,its developm5t is connect$ ) ! k ( ! non-ego1 b ?is is due1 n to ! fact ( p]sonality1 b to ! fact ( f9ite p]sonality4 ,! mature man c live = a long "t ^u 8 own res\rces4 ,god ne$s no o!r1 to /ir him up to m5tal activity4 ,f9it5ess is a h9drance to ! developm5t ( our p]sonality4 ,inf9it5ess is necess>y to ! highe/ p]sonality40 ,lotze1 ,microcosmos1 vol4 #c1 *apt] #d2 transl4 9 ,n4 ,eng41 ,m>*1 #ahha3aia-bjj--8;,f9ite _s1 n hav+ conditions ( exi/5ce 9 itself1 c "k ! ego only ^u occasion ( kn[+ ! non-ego4 ,! ,inf9ite is n s limit$4 ,he alone has an indep5d5t exi/5ce1 nei!r introduc$ nor develop$ ?r\gh any?+ n himself1 b1 9 an inw>d activity )\t beg9n+ or end1 ma9ta9s himself 9 himself40 ,see also ,lotze1 ,philos4 ( ,religion1 #ee-fi2 ,h4 ,n4 ,g>d9] on ,lotze1 9 ,presb4 ,rev41 #ahhe3ffi-fgc2 ,webb1 9 ,j\r4 ,!ol4 ,/udies1 #b3di-fa4 ,dorn]1 ,glaub5slehre3 8,absolute ,p]sonality p]fect consci\sness ( self1 & p]fect p[] ov] self4 ,we ne$ some?+ ext]nal to wak5 our consci\sness--yet self-consci\sness comes logically be=e consci\sness ( ! _w4 ,x is ! s\l's act4 ,only aft] x has di/+ui%$ self f self1 c x consci\sly di/+ui% self f ano!r40 ,briti% ,qu>t]ly1 ,jan4 #ahgd3cb1 note2 ,july1 #ahhd3ajh--8,! ego is ?9kable only 9 relation to ! non-ego2 b ! ego is liveable long be=e any su* relation40 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3ahe1 #ahf--;,9 ! pan!i/ic s*eme1 8,god di/+ui%es himself f ! _w1 & !reby f9ds ! object requir$ by ! subject2 444 9 ! ,*ri/ian s*eme1 ,god di/+ui%es himself f himself1 n f some?+ t is n himself40 ,see ,julius ,mll]1 ,doctr9e ( ,s91 #b3abb-abf2 ,*ri/lieb1 ,mod4 ,d\bt & ,*ri/4 ,belief1 #afa-aij2 ,hanne1 ,idee d] absolut5 ,p]snli*keit2 ,ei*horn1 ,die ,p]snli*keit ,gottes2 ,se?1 ,hegelianism & ,p]sonality2 ,knight1 on ,p]sonality & ! ,inf9ite1 9 ,/udies 9 ,philos4 & ,lit41 #gj-aah4 ,on ! :ole subject ( ,pan!ism1 see ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy ( ,religion1 #b3ada-aid1 esp4 #aib--8,! p]sonality ( ,god consi/s 9 8 volunt>y ag5cy z free cause 9 an unpl$g$ sph]e1 t is1 a sph]e transc5d+ t ( imman5t law4 ,b precisely ?is also x is t con/itutes 8 inf9ity1 ext5d+ 8 sway1 aft] x has fill$ ! actual1 ov] all ! possible1 & giv+ comm& ov] indef9ite alt]natives4 ,?\gh y might d5y 8 inf9ity )\t prejudice to 8 p]sonality1 y _c d5y 8 p]sonality )\t sacrific+ 8 inf9itude3 = !re is a mode ( action--! pref]5tial1 ! v mode :i* di/+ui%es rational be+s--f :i* y exclude him02 #cda--8,! metaphysicians :o1 9 _! impati5ce ( di/9ction1 insi/ on tak+ ! sea on bo>d ! boat1 swamp n only x b ! ?\ght x holds1 & leave an inf9itude :i*1 z x c look into no eye & :isp] into no e>1 !y contradict 9 ! v act ( affirm+40 ,jean ,paul ,ri*t]'s 8,dream03 8,i w&]$ to ! f>!/ v]ge ( ,creation1 & !re ,i saw a ,socket1 :]e an ,eye %\ld h be51 & ,i he>d ! %riek ( a ,fa!rless ,_w0 7quot$ 9 ,david ,br[n's ,memoir ( ,john ,duncan1 #di-gj74 ,%elley1 ,beatrice ,c5ci3 8,sweet ,heav51 =give weak ?\ghts6 ,if !re %\ld be ,no ,god1 no ,heav51 no ,e>?1 9 ! void _w--,! wide1 grey1 lampless1 deep1 unpeopl$ _w60 ,= ! opposite view1 see ,bi$]mann1 ,dogmatik1 #fch-fdg--8,only man1 z f9ite _s1 is p]sonal2 ,god1 z absolute _s1 is n p]sonal4 ,yet 9 religion ! mutual relations ( int]c\rse & communion are always p]sonal4444 ,p]sonality is ! only adequate t]m by :i* we c repres5t ! !i/ic conception ( ,god40 ,bruce1 ,provid5tial ,ord]1 #gf--8,s*op5hau] does n level up cosmic =ce to ! human1 b levels d[n human w-=ce to ! cosmic4 ,sp9oza held intellect 9 ,god to be no m l man's ?an ! dog-/> is l a dog4 ,h>tmann add$ intellect to ,s*op5hau]'s w1 b ! intellect is unconsci\s & kn[s no moral di/9ctions40 ,see also ,bruce1 ,apologetics1 #ga-ij2 ,b[ne1 ,philos4 ( ,!ism1 #abh-acd1 #aga-ahf2 ,j4 ,m4 ,:iton1 ,am4 ,j\r4 ,!ol41 ,apl4 #aija3cjf--,pan!ism ,god consi/s 9 all ?+s2 ,!ism ,all ?+s consi/ 9 ,god1 _! gr\nd1 n _! sum4 ,_s 9 man %[s t ! inf9ite ,_s mu/ be p]sonal & transc5d5t ,m9d & ,w4 ,,iv4 ,e?ical ,monism4 ,e?ical ,monism is t me?od ( ?\ght :i* holds to a s+le sub/ance1 gr\nd1 or pr9ciple ( be+1 namely1 ,god1 b :i* also holds to ! e?ical facts ( ,god's transc5d5ce z well z 8 imman5ce1 & ( ,god's p]sonality z di/9ct f1 & z gu>antee+1 ! p]sonality ( man4 ,al?\gh we d n "h assume ! au?ority ( ! ,bible1 res]v+ our pro( ( ?is to ! next foll[+ division on ,! ,scriptures a ,revelation f ,god1 we may yet cite passages :i* %[ t our doctr9e is n inconsi/5t ) ! tea*+s ( holy ,writ4 ,! imman5ce ( ,god is impli$ 9 all /atem5ts ( 8 omnipres5ce1 z = example3 ,ps4 #aci3g sq4--8,:i!r %all ,i g f ?y _s8 ,or :i!r %all ,i flee f ?y pres5ce80 ,j]4 #bc3bc1 #bd--8;,am ,i a ,god at h&1 sai? ,jehovah1 & n a ,god af> (f8444 ,d n ,i fill heav5 & e>?80 ,acts #ag3bg1 #bh--8;he is n f> f ea* "o ( u3 = 9 him we live1 & move1 & h our be+40 ,! transc5d5ce ( ,god is impli$ 9 su* passages z3 #a ,k+s #h3bg--8! heav5 & ! heav5 ( heav5s _c conta9 !e02 ,ps4 #aac3e--8t ha? 8 seat on high02 ,is4 #eg3ae--8! high & l(ty ,"o t inhabite? et]nity40 ,?is is ! fai? ( ,augu/9e3 8,o ,god1 ?\ ha/ made u = ?yself1 & our he>t is re/less till x f9d re/ 9 !e4444 ,i c\ld n be1 ,o my ,god1 c\ld n be at all1 w]t ?\ n 9 me2 r1 7 n ,i 9 !e1 ( :om are all ?+s1 by :om are all ?+s1 9 :om are all ?+s40 ,& ,anselm1 9 8 ,proslogion1 says ( ! div9e nature3 8,x is ! ess5ce ( ! be+1 ! pr9ciple ( ! exi/5ce1 ( all ?+s4444 ,)\t p>ts1 )\t diff]5ces1 )\t accid5ts1 )\t *anges1 x might be said 9 a c]ta9 s5se alone to exi/1 = 9 respect to x ! o!r ?+s :i* appe> to be h no exi/5ce4 ,! un*angeable ,_s is all t is1 & x is ?is )\t limit1 simply1 int]m9ably4 ,x is ! p]fect & absolute ,exi/5ce4 ,! re/ has come f non-entity1 & ?i!r returns if n support$ by ,god4 ,x does n exi/ by itself4 ,9 ?is s5se ! ,creator alone exi/s2 creat$ ?+s d n40 #a4 ,:ile ,e?ical ,monism embraces ! "o elem5t ( tru? conta9$ 9 ,pan!ism--! tru? t ,god is 9 all ?+s & t all ?+s are 9 ,god--x reg>ds ?is sci5tific unity z entirely consi/5t ) ! facts ( e?ics--man's fre$om1 responsibility1 s91 & guilt2 9 o!r words1 ,metaphysical ,monism1 or ! doctr9e ( "o sub/ance1 gr\nd1 or pr9ciple ( be+1 is qualifi$ by ,psy*ological ,dualism1 or ! doctr9e t ! s\l is p]sonally di/9ct f matt] on ! "o h&1 & f ,god on ! o!r4 ,e?ical ,monism is a monism :i* holds to ! e?ical facts ( ! fre$om ( man & ! transc5d5ce & p]sonality ( ,god2 x is ! monism ( free-w1 9 :i* p]sonality1 bo? human & div9e1 s9 & righte\sness1 ,god & ! _w1 rema9--two 9 "o1 & "o 9 two--9 _! moral anti!sis z well z _! natural unity4 ,ladd1 ,introd4 to ,philosophy3 8,dualism is yield+1 9 hi/ory & 9 ! judgm5t-halls ( reason1 to a moni/ic philosophy4444 ,"s =m ( philosophical monism is indicat$ by ! rese>*es ( psy*o-physics1 & by t philosophy ( m9d :i* builds ^u ! pr9ciples asc]ta9$ by ^! rese>*es4 ,realities correlat$ z are ! body & ! m9d mu/ h1 z x 71 a common gr\nd4444 ,!y h _! reality 9 ! ultimate "o ,reality2 !y h _! int]relat$ lives z expressions ( ! "o ,life :i* is imman5t 9 ! two4444 ,only "s =m ( monism t %all satisfy ! facts & tru?s to :i* bo? realism & idealism appeal c occupy ! place ( ! true & f9al philosophy4444 ,monism mu/ s con/ruct its t5ets z to pres]ve1 or at lea/ z n to contradict & de/roy1 ! tru?s implicat$ 9 ! di/9ction betwe5 ! me & ! n-me1 444 betwe5 ! morally good & ! morally evil4 ,no =m ( monism c p]si/5tly ma9ta9 itself :i* erects its sy/em ^u ! ru9s ( fundam5tally e?ical pr9ciples & ideals40444 ,philosophy ( ,m9d1 #daa--8;,dualism mu/ be dissolv$ 9 "s ultimate moni/ic solution4 ,! ,be+ ( ! _w1 ( :i* all p>ticul> be+s are b p>ts1 mu/ be s conceiv$ ( z t 9 x c be f\nd ! "o gr\nd ( all int]relat$ exi/5ces & activities4444 ,?is "o ,pr9ciple is an ,o!r & an ,absolute ,m9d40 ,dorn]1 ,hi/4 ,doct4 ,p]son ( ,*ri/1 ,,ii1 #c3aja1 #bca--8,! unity ( ess5ce 9 ,god & man is ! great discov]y ( ! pres5t age4444 ,! *>act]i/ic feature ( all rec5t ,*ri/ologies is ! endeavor to po9t out ! ess5tial unity ( ! div9e & human4 ,to ! !ology ( ! pres5t day1 ! div9e & human are n mutually exclusive1 b are connect$ magnitudes4444 ,yet fai? po/ulates a diff]5ce betwe5 ! _w & ,god1 betwe5 :om religion seeks an union4 ,fai? does n wi% to be a relation m]ely to itself1 or to its own repres5tations & ?\ghts2 t w\ld be a monologue1--fai? desires a dialogue4 ,!re=e x does n consort ) a monism :i* recognizes only ,god1 or only ! _w2 x opposes su* a monism z ?is4 ,duality is1 9 fact1 a condition ( true & vital unity4 ,b duality is n dualism4 ,x has no desire to oppose ! rational dem& = unity40 ,pr(essor ,small ( ,*icago3 8,) r>e exceptions on ea* side1 all philosophy to-day is moni/ic 9 its ontological presumptions2 x is duali/ic 9 its me?odological proc$ures40 ,a4 ,h4 ,brad=d1 ,age ( ,fai?1 #ga--8,m5 & ,god are ! same 9 sub/ance1 ?\gh n id5tical z individuals40 ,! !ology ( fifty ye>s ago 0 m]ely individuali/ic1 & ignor$ ! complem5t>y tru? ( solid>ity4 ,simil>ly we ?9k ( ! cont95ts & isl&s ( our globe z disjo9$ f "o ano!r4 ,! dissociable sea is reg>d$ z an absolute b>ri] betwe5 !m4 ,b if ! ocean c\ld be dri$1 we %\ld see t all ! :ile !re _h be5 subm>9e connections1 & ! hidd5 unity ( all l&s w\ld appe>4 ,s ! individuality ( human be+s1 real z x is1 is n ! only reality4 ,!re is ! pr(\nd] fact ( a common life4 ,ev5 ! great m\nta9-peaks ( p]sonality are sup]ficial di/9ctions1 comp>$ ) ! organic on5ess 9 :i* !y are root$1 into :i* !y all dip d[n1 & f :i* !y all1 l volcanoes1 receive at times quick & ov]fl[+ impulses ( insight1 emotion & en]gy2 see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation & ,e?ical ,monism1 #ahi1 #aij4 #b4 ,9 contra/ !n ) ! two errors ( ,pan!ism--! d5ial ( ,god's transc5d5ce & ! d5ial ( ,god's p]sonality--,e?ical ,monism holds t ! univ]se1 in/ead ( be+ "o ) ,god & cont]m9\s ) ,god1 is b a f9ite1 p>tial & progressive manife/ation ( ! div9e ,life3 ,matt] be+ ,god's self-limitation "u ! law ( ,necessity2 ,humanity be+ ,god's self-limitation "u ! law ( ,fre$om2 ,inc>nation & ,atonem5t be+ ,god's self-limitations "u ! law ( ,grace4 ,! univ]se is relat$ to ,god z my ?\ghts are relat$ to me1 ! ?9k]4 ,i am great] ?an my ?\ghts1 & my ?\ghts v>y 9 moral value4 ,e?ical ,monism traces ! univ]se back to a beg9n+1 :ile ,pan!ism reg>ds ! univ]se z cot]nal ) ,god4 ,e?ical ,monism ass]ts ,god's transc5d5ce1 :ile ,pan!ism reg>ds ,god z imprison$ 9 ! univ]se4 ,e?ical ,monism ass]ts t ! heav5 ( heav5s _c conta9 him1 b t contr>iwise ! :ole univ]se tak5 toge!r1 ) its elem5ts & =ces1 its suns & sy/ems1 is b a light brea? f 8 m\?1 or a drop ( dew ^u ! fr+e ( 8 g>m5t4 ,upton1 ,hibb]t ,lectures3 8,! ,et]nal is pres5t 9 e f9ite ?+1 & is felt & kn[n to be pres5t 9 e rational s\l2 b /ill is n brok5 up into individualities1 b ev] rema9s "o & ! same et]nal sub/ance1 "o & ! same unify+ pr9ciple1 imman5tly & indivisibly pres5t 9 e "o ( t c\ntless plurality ( f9ite individuals into :i* man's analyz+ und]/&+ dissects ! ,cosmos40 ,james ,m>t9eau1 9 #ai? ,c5tury1 ,apl4 #ahie3eei--8,:at is ,nature b ! prov9ce ( ,god's pl$g$ & habitual causality8 ,& :at is ,_s1 b ! prov9ce ( 8 free causality1 respond+ to ! ne$s & affections ( 8 *ildr58444 ,god is n a retir$ ar*itect1 :o may n[ & !n be call$ 9 = repairs4 ,nature is n self-active1 & ,god's ag5cy is n intrusive40 ,calv93 ,pie hoc pote/ dici1 ,deum esse ,naturam4 ,) ?is doctr9e _m poets %[ _! sympa?y4 8,e fre% & new creation1 ,a div9e improvisation1 ,f ! he>t ( ,god proce$s40 ,rob]t ,br[n+ ass]ts ,god's imman5ce2 ,hoh5/iel-,s*wangau3 8,?is is ! glory t1 9 all conceiv$ ,or felt1 or kn[n1 ,i recognize a ,m9d--,n m9e1 b l m9e--= ! d\ble joy1 ,mak+ all ?+s = me1 & me = him02 ,r+ & ,book1 ,pope3 8,o ?\1 z repres5t$ to me "h ,9 su* conception z my s\l all[s--,"u ?y measureless1 my atom-wid?6 ,man's m9d1 :at is x b a convex glass1 ,:]e9 are ga!r$ all ! scatt]$ po9ts ,pick$ out ( ! imm5sity ( sky1 ,to reunite !re1 be our heav5 = e>?1 ,our ,kn[n ,unkn[n1 our ,god reveal$ to man80 ,b ,br[n+ also ass]ts ,god's transc5d5ce3 9 ,dea? 9 ! ,des]t1 we read3 8,man is n ,god1 b ha? ,god's end to s]ve1 ,a ,ma/] to obey1 a ,cause to take1 ,some:at to ca/ (f1 some:at to become02 9 ,*ri/mas ,eve1 ! poet d]ides 8,! important /umble ,( add+1 he1 ! sage & humble1 ,0 also "o ) ! ,creator02 he tells u t x 0 ,god's plan to make man 9 8 image3 8,to create man1 & !n leave him ,able1 8 own ^w sai?1 to grieve him2 ,b able to glorify him too1 ,z a m]e ma*9e c\ld nev] d ,t pray$ or prais$1 all unaw>e ,( its fitness = aught b praise or pray]1 ,made p]fect z a ?+ ( c\rse4444 ,god1 ^: pleasure br\ght ,man into be+1 /&s away1 ,z x 71 a h&-bread? (f1 to give ,room = ! newly made to live ,& look at him f a place ap>t ,& use 8 gifts ( bra9 & he>t02 8,life's bus9ess be+ j ! t]rible *oice40 ,s ,t5nyson's ,high] ,pan!ism3 8,! sun1 ! moon1 ! />s1 ! seas1 ! hills1 & ! pla9s1 ,are n ^!1 ,o s\l1 ! vision ( ,him :o reigns8 ,d>k is ! _w to !e2 ?\ ?yself art ! reason :y2 ,= is n ,he all b ?\1 t ha/ p[] to feel #8,i am ,i'8 ,speak to him1 ?\1 = he he>s1 & _s ) _s c meet2 ,clos] is he ?an brea?+1 & ne>] ?an h&s & feet4 ,& ! e> ( man _c he>1 & ! eye ( man _c see2 ,b if we c\ld see & he>1 ?is vision--7 x n ,he80 ,also ,t5nyson's ,anci5t ,sage3 8,b t "o ripple on ! b\ndless deep ,feels t ! deep is b\ndless1 & itself ,=ev] *ang+ =m1 b ev]more ,"o ) ! b\ndless motion ( ! deep02 & ,9 ,memoriam3 8,"o ,god1 "o law1 "o elem5t1 ,& "o f>-(f div9e ev5t1 ,t[>d :i* ! :ole creation moves40 ,em]son3 8,! day ( days1 ! greate/ day 9 ! fea/ ( life1 is t 9 :i* ! inw>d eye op5s to ! unity ( ?+s02 8,9 ! mud & scum ( ?+s ,some?+ always1 always s+s40 ,mrs4 ,br[n+3 8,e>? is cramm$ ) heav51 ,& e common bu% afire ) ,god2 ,b only he :o sees takes (f 8 %oes40 ,s manhood is itself pot5tially a div9e ?+4 ,all life1 9 all its va/ v>iety1 c h b "o ,s\rce4 ,x is ei!r "o ,god1 above all1 ?r\gh all1 & 9 all1 or x is no ,god at all4 ,e4 ,m4 ,poteat1 ,on ,*esapeake ,bay3 8,night's radiant glory ov]head1 ,a s(t] glory !re bel[1 ,deep answ]$ unto deep1 & said3 ,a k9dr$ fire 9 u do? gl[4 ,= life is "o--( sea & />s1 ,( ,god & man1 ( e>? & heav5--,& by no !ologic b>s ,%all my scant life f ,god's be riv540 ,see ,pr(essor ,h5ry ,jones1 ,rob]t ,br[n+4 #c4 ,! imman5ce ( ,god1 z ! "o sub/ance1 gr\nd & pr9ciple ( be+1 does n de/roy1 b r gu>antees1 ! individuality & rights ( ea* portion ( ! univ]se1 s t !re is v>iety ( rank & end[m5t4 ,9 ! case ( moral be+s1 wor? is det]m9$ by ! degree ( _! volunt>y recognition & appropriation ( ! div9e4 ,:ile ,god is all1 he is also 9 all2 s mak+ ! univ]se a grad$ & progressive manife/ation ( himself1 bo? 9 8 love = righte\sness & 8 opposition to moral evil4 ,x has be5 *>g$ t ! doctr9e ( monism necess>ily involves moral indiff]5ce2 t ! div9e pres5ce 9 all ?+s breaks d[n all di/9ctions ( rank & makes ea* ?+ equal to e o!r2 t ! evil z well z ! good is legitimat$ & consecrat$4 ,( pan!i/ic monism all ?is is true1--x is n true ( e?ical monism2 = e?ical monism is ! monism t recognizes ! e?ical fact ( p]sonal intellig5ce & w 9 bo? ,god & man1 & ) ^! ,god's purpose 9 mak+ ! univ]se a v>i$ manife/ation ( himself4 ,! wor%ip ( cats & bulls & crocodiles 9 anci5t ,egypt1 & ! deification ( lu/ 9 ! ,brahmanic temples ( ,india1 7 expressions ( a non-e?ical monism1 :i* saw 9 ,god no moral attributes1 & :i* id5tifi$ ,god ) 8 manife/ations4 ,z an illu/ration ( ! mi/akes into :i* ! critics ( monism may fall = lack ( discrim9ation betwe5 monism t is pan!i/ic & monism t is e?ical1 we quote f ,emma ,m>ie ,caill>d3 8,integral p>ts ( ,god are1 on moni/ic premises1 li>s1 s5suali/s1 murd]]s1 evil liv]s & evil ?9k]s ( e description4 ,_! crimes & _! passions ent] intr9sically into ! div9e exp]i5ce4 ,! inf9ite ,individual 9 8 :ol5ess may reject !m inde$1 b none ! less are ^! evil f9ite individuals con/itu5t p>ts ( him1 ev5 z ! twigs ( a tree1 ?\gh !y are n ! tree1 & ?\gh ! tree transc5ds any or all ( !m1 are yet con/itu5t p>ts ( x4 ,c he ^: univ]sal consci\sness includes & def9es all f9ite consci\snesses be o!r ?an responsible = all f9ite actions & motives80 ,to ?is indictm5t we may reply 9 ! words ( ,b[ne1 ,! ,div9e ,imman5ce1 #acj-acc--8,"s weak heads h be5 s heat$ by ! new w9e ( imman5ce z to put all ?+s on ! same level1 & make m5 & mice ( equal value4 ,b !re is no?+ 9 ! dep5d5ce ( all ?+s on ,god to remove _! di/9ctions ( value4 ,"o confus$ talk] ( ?is type 0 l$ to say t he _h no tr\ble ) ! notion ( a div9e man1 z he believ$ 9 a div9e oy/]4 ,o!rs h us$ ! doctr9e to cancel moral diff]5ces2 = if ,god be 9 all ?+s1 & if all ?+s repres5t 8 w1 !n :atev] is is "r4 ,b ?is too is ha/y4 ,( c\rse ev5 ! evil w is n indep5d5t ( ,god1 b lives & moves & has its be+ 9 & ?r\gh ! div9e4 ,b ?r\gh its my/]i\s p[] ( selfhood & self-det]m9ation ! evil w is able to assume an attitude ( ho/ility to ! div9e law1 :i* =?) v9dicates itself by appropriate reactions4 8,^! reactions are n div9e 9 ! highe/ or ideal s5se4 ,!y repres5t no?+ :i* ,god desires or 9 :i* he delights2 b !y are div9e 9 ! s5se t !y are ?+s to be done "u ! circum/ances4 ,! div9e reaction 9 ! case ( ! good is di/9ct f ! div9e reaction aga9/ evil4 ,bo? are div9e z repres5t+ ,god's action1 b only ! =m] is div9e 9 ! s5se ( repres5t+ ,god's approval & sympa?y4 ,all ?+s s]ve1 said ,sp9oza4 ,! good s]ve1 & are fur!r$ by _! s]vice4 ,! bad also s]ve & are us$ up 9 ! s]v+4 ,accord+ to ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 ! wick$ are useful #89 be+ act$ ^u & dispos$ (4' ,z #8vessels ( di%onor' !y may reveal ! maje/y ( ,god4 ,!re is no?+ !re=e 9 ! div9e imman5ce1 9 its only t5able =m1 to cancel moral di/9ctions or to m9ify retribution4 ,! div9e reaction aga9/ iniquity is ev5 m solemn 9 ?is doctr9e4 ,! besett+ ,god is ! et]nal & unescapable environm5t2 & only z we are 9 h>mony ) him c !re be any peace4444 ,:at ,god ?9ks ( s91 & :at 8 w is conc]n+ x c be pla9ly se5 9 ! natural consequ5ces :i* att5d x4444 ,9 law itself we are face to face ) ,god2 & natural consequ5ces h a sup]natural mean+40 #d4 ,s9ce ,*ri/ is ! ,logos ( ,god1 ! imman5t ,god1 ,god reveal$ 9 ,nature1 9 ,humanity1 9 ,r$emption1 ,e?ical ,monism recognizes ! univ]se z creat$1 upheld1 & gov]n$ by ! same ,be+ :o 9 ! c\rse ( hi/ory 0 manife/ 9 human =m & :o made atonem5t = human s9 by 8 dea? on ,calv>y4 ,! secret ( ! univ]se & ! key to its my/]ies are to be f\nd 9 ! ,cross4 ,john #a3a-d 7m>g471 #ad1 #ah--8;,9 ! beg9n+ 0 ! ,^w1 & ! ,^w 0 ) ,god1 & ! ,^w 0 ,god4 ,! same 0 9 ! beg9n+ ) ,god4 ,all ?+s 7 made ?r\gh him2 & )\t him 0 n any ?+ made4 ,t :i* ha? be5 made 0 life 9 him2 & ! life 0 ! light ( m54444 ,& ! ,^w became fle%1 & dwelt among u4444 ,no man ha? se5 ,god at any "t2 ! only begott5 ,son1 :o is 9 ! bosom ( ! ,fa!r1 he ha? decl>$ him40 ,col4 #a3af1 #ag--8;= 9 him 7 all ?+s creat$1 9 ! heav5s & ^u ! e>?1 ?+s visible & ?+s invisible1 :e!r ?rones or dom9ions or pr9cipalities or p[]s2 all ?+s h be5 creat$ ?r\gh him & unto him2 & he is be=e all ?+s1 & 9 him all ?+s consi/40 ,heb4 #a3b1 #c--8;8 ,son 444 ?r\gh :om also he made ! worlds 444 uphold+ all ?+s by ! ^w ( 8 p[]02 ,eph4 #a3bb1 #bc--8! *ur*1 :i* is 8 body1 ! fulness ( him t fille? all 9 all0 fills all ?+s ) all t !y conta9 ( tru?1 beauty1 & goodness2 ,col4 #b3b1 #c1 #i--8! my/]y ( ,god1 ev5 ,*ri/1 9 :om are all ! treasures ( wisdom & k hidd5 444 = 9 him dwelle? all ! fulness ( ! ,godhead bodily40 ,?is view ( ! relation ( ! univ]se to ,god lays ! f\ndation = a ,*ri/ian application ( rec5t philosophical doctr9e4 ,matt] is no long] bl9d & dead1 b is spiritual 9 its nature1 n 9 ! s5se t x is _s1 b 9 ! s5se t x is ! cont9ual manife/ation ( _s1 j z my ?\ghts are a liv+ & cont9ual manife/ation ( myself4 ,yet matt] does n consi/ simply 9 ideas1 = ideas1 depriv$ ( an ext]nal object & ( an int]nal subject1 are left susp5d$ 9 ! air4 ,ideas are ! product ( ,m9d4 ,b matt] is kn[n only z ! op]ation ( =ce1 & =ce is ! product ( ,w4 ,s9ce ?is =ce works 9 rational ways1 x c be ! product only ( ,_s4 ,! sy/em ( =ces :i* we call ! univ]se is ! imm$iate product ( ! m9d & w ( ,god2 &1 s9ce ,*ri/ is ! m9d & w ( ,god 9 ex]cise1 ,*ri/ is ! ,creator & ,uphold] ( ! univ]se4 ,nature is ! omnipres5t ,*ri/1 manife/+ ,god to creatures4 ,*ri/ is ! pr9ciple ( cohesion1 attraction1 int]action1 n only 9 ! physical univ]se1 b 9 ! intellectual & moral univ]se z well4 ,9 all our kn[+1 ! kn[] & kn[n are 8connect$ by "s ,be+ :o is _! reality10 & ?is be+ is ,*ri/1 8! ,light :i* lighte? e man0 7,john #a3i74 ,we "k 9 ,*ri/1 j z 89 him we live1 & move1 & h our be+0 7,acts #ag3bh74 ,z ! attraction ( gravitation & ! pr9ciple ( evolution are only o!r names = ,*ri/1 s he is ! basis ( inductive reason+ & ! gr\nd ( moral unity 9 ! creation4 ,i am b\nd to love my neighbor z myself because he has 9 him ! same life t is 9 me1 ! life ( ,god 9 ,*ri/4 ,! ,*ri/ 9 :om all humanity is creat$1 & 9 :om all humanity consi/s1 holds toge!r ! moral univ]se1 draw+ all m5 to himself & s draw+ !m to ,god4 ,?r\gh him ,god 8reconciles all ?+s unto himself 444 :e!r ?+s ^u ! e>?1 or ?+s 9 ! heav5s0 7,col4 #a3bj74 ,z ,pan!ism exclusive imman5ce ,god imprison$1 s ,deism exclusive transc5d5ce ,god bani%$4 ,e?ical ,monism holds to ! tru? conta9$ 9 ea* ( ^! sy/ems1 :ile avoid+ _! respective errors4 ,x furni%es ! basis = a new int]pretation ( _m !ological z well z ( _m philosophical doctr9es4 ,x helps our und]/&+ ( ! ,tr9ity4 ,if )9 ! b\nds ( ,god's be+ !re c exi/ multitud9\s f9ite p]sonalities1 x becomes easi] to compreh5d h[ )9 ^? same b\nds !re c be ?ree et]nal & inf9ite p]sonalities1--inde$1 ! integration ( plural consci\snesses 9 an all-embrac+ div9e consci\sness may f9d a valid analogy 9 ! integration ( subord9ate consci\snesses 9 ! unit-p]sonality ( man2 see ,baldw91 ,h&book ( ,psy*ology1 ,feel+ & ,w1 #ec1 #ed4 ,e?ical ,monism1 s9ce x is e?ical1 leaves room = human wills & = _! fre$om4 ,:ile man c\ld nev] break ! natural bond :i* unit$ him to ,god1 he c\ld break ! spiritual bond & introduce into creation a pr9ciple ( discord & evil4 ,tie a cord tightly ab\t y\r f+]2 y p>tially isolate ! f+]1 dim9i% its nutrition1 br+ ab\t atrophy & disease4 ,s !re has be5 giv5 to ea* intellig5t & moral ag5t ! p[]1 spiritually to isolate himself f ,god :ile yet he is naturally jo9$ to ,god4 ,z humanity is creat$ 9 ,*ri/ & lives only 9 ,*ri/1 man's self-isolation is 8 moral sep>ation f ,*ri/4 ,simon1 ,r$emption ( ,man1 #cci--8,reject+ ,*ri/ is n s mu* refusal to become "o ) ,*ri/ z x is refusal to rema9 "o ) him1 refusal to let him be our life40 ,all m5 are naturally "o ) ,*ri/ by physical bir?1 be=e !y become morally "o ) him by spiritual bir?4 ,!y may set !mselves aga9/ him & may oppose him =ev]4 ,?is our ,"l intimates1 :5 he tells u t !re are natural bran*es ( ,*ri/1 :i* d n 8abide 9 ! v9e0 or 8be> fruit10 & s are 8ca/ =?10 8)]$10 & 8burn$0 7,john #ae3d-f74 ,e?ical ,monism1 h[ev]1 s9ce x is ,monism1 enables u to und]/& ! pr9ciple ( ! ,atonem5t4 ,?\gh ,god's hol9ess b9ds him to puni% s91 ! ,*ri/ :o has jo9$ himself to ! s9n] mu/ %>e ! s9n]'s puni%m5t4 ,he :o is ! life ( humanity mu/ take ^u 8 own he>t ! burd5 ( %ame & p5alty t belongs to 8 memb]s4 ,tie ! cord ab\t y\r f+]2 n only ! f+] suff]s pa91 b also ! he>t2 ! life ( ! :ole sy/em r\ses itself to put away ! evil1 to untie ! cord1 to free ! diseas$ & suff]+ memb]4 ,humanity is b\nd to ,*ri/1 z ! f+] to ! body4 ,s9ce human nature is "o ( ! 8all ?+s0 t 8consi/0 or hold toge!r 9 ,*ri/ 7,col #a3ag71 & man's s9 is a self-p]v]sion ( a "p ( ,*ri/'s own body1 ! :ole mu/ be injur$ by ! self-inflict$ injury ( ! "p1 & 8x mu/ ne$s be t ,*ri/ %\ld suff]0 7,acts #ag3c74 ,simon1 ,r$emption ( ,man1 #cba--8;,if ! ,logos is ! ,m$iator ( ! div9e imman5ce 9 creation1 especially 9 man2 if m5 are diff]5tiations ( ! efflu5t div9e en]gy2 & if ! ,logos is ! imman5t controll+ pr9ciple ( all diff]5tiation--i4 e41 ! pr9ciple ( all =m--mu/ n ! self-p]v]sion ( ^! human diff]5tiations react on him :o is _! con/itutive pr9ciple80 ,a m full explanation ( ! relations ( ,e?ical ,monism to o!r doctr9es mu/ be res]v$ to our sep>ate treatm5t ( ! ,tr9ity1 ,creation1 ,s91 ,atonem5t1 ,reg5]ation4 ,portions ( ! subject are treat$ by ,upton1 ,hibb]t ,lectures2 ,le ,conte1 9 ,royce's ,conception ( ,god1 #dc-ej2 ,b[ne1 ,!ory ( ,?\ght & ,k1 #big-cja1 #caa-cag1 & ,imman5ce ( ,god1 #e-cb1 #aaf-aec2 ,ladd1 ,philos4 ( ,k1 #egd-eij1 & ,!ory ( ,reality1 #ebe-ebi2 ,edw>d ,caird1 ,evolution ( ,religion1 #b3dh2 ,w>d1 ,naturalism & ,agno/icism1 #b3beh-bhc2 ,gs*el1 quot$ 9 ,dorn]1 ,hi/4 ,doct4 ,p]son ( ,*ri/1 #e3agj4 ,an attempt has be5 made to treat ! :ole subject by ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation & ,e?ical ,monism1 #a-hf1 #ada-afb1 #aff-ahj1 #ahf-bjh4 ,,"p ,,iii4 ,,! ,,scriptures ,a ,,revelation ,,f ,,god4 ,*apt] ,i4 ,prelim9>y ,consid]ations4 ,i4 ,reasons a priori = expect+ a ,revelation f ,god4 #a4 ,ne$s ( man's nature4 ,man's intellectual & moral nature requires1 9 ord] to pres]ve x f con/ant det]ioration1 & to ensure its moral gr[? & progress1 an au?oritative & helpful revelation ( religi\s tru?1 ( a high] & complet] sort ?an any to :i*1 9 its pres5t /ate ( s91 x c atta9 by ! use ( its unaid$ p[]s4 ,! pro( ( ?is proposition is p>tly psy*ological1 & p>tly hi/orical4 ,a4 ,psy*ological pro(4--7a7 ,nei!r reason nor intuition ?r[s light ^u c]ta9 que/ions ^: solution is ( ! utmo/ importance to u2 = example1 ,tr9ity1 atonem5t1 p>don1 me?od ( wor%ip1 p]sonal exi/5ce aft] dea?4 7b7 ,ev5 ! tru? to :i* we arrive by our natural p[]s ne$s div9e confirmation & au?ority :5 x addresses m9ds & wills p]v]t$ by s94 7c7 ,to break ?is p[] ( s91 & to furni% enc\ragem5t to moral ef=t1 we ne$ a special revelation ( ! m]ciful & helpful aspect ( ! div9e nature4 7a7 ,brem5 ,lectures1 #gb1 #gc2 ,plato1 ,second ,alcibiades1 #bb1 #bc2 ,phd1 #he-- 4 ,iamblicus1 1 *ap4 #bh4 s*ylus1 9 8 ,agamemnon1 %[s h[ completely reason & intuition fail$ to supply ! k ( ,god :i* man ne$s3 8,r5[n is l\d10 he says1 8& n to lose "o's s5ses is ,god's greate/ gift4444 ,! be+ prais$ outrage\sly ,is grave2 = at ! eyes ( su* a "o ,is laun*$1 f ,zeus1 ! ?und]-/one4 ,!re=e d ,i decide ,= s mu* & no m prosp]ity ,?an ( 8 envy passes unespi$40 ,?\gh ! gods might h favorites1 !y did n love m5 z m51 b r1 envi$ & hat$ !m4 ,william ,james1 ,is ,life ,wor? ,liv+8 9 ,int]nat4 ,j\r4 ,e?ics1 ,oct4 #ahie3aj--8;,all we "k ( good & beauty proce$s f nature1 b none ! less all we "k ( evil4444 ,to su* a h>lot we owe no moral allegiance4444 ,if !re be a div9e ,_s ( ! univ]se1 nature1 su* z we "k h]1 _c possibly be its ultimate ^w to man4 ,ei!r !re is no ,_s reveal$ 9 nature1 or else x is inadequately reveal$ !re2 &1 z all ! high] religions h assum$1 :at we call visible nature1 or ?is _w1 mu/ be b a veil & surface-%[ ^: full mean+ resides 9 a supplem5t>y unse5 or o!r _w40 7b7 ,v]sus ,socrates3 ,m5 w d "r1 if !y only "k ! "r4 ,pfleid]]1 ,philos4 ,relig41 #a3bai--8;,9 opposition to ! op9ion ( ,socrates t badness re/s ^u ignorance1 ,ari/otle already call$ ! fact to m9d t ! do+ ( ! good is n always comb9$ ) ! kn[+ ( x1 see+ t x dep5ds also on ! passions4 ,if badness consi/$ only 9 ! want ( k1 !n ^? :o are !oretically mo/ cultivat$ mu/ also be morally ! be/1 :i* no "o w v5ture to ass]t40 ,w4 ,s4 ,lilly1 ,on ,%ibbole?s3 8,ignorance is (t5 held to be ! root ( all evil4 ,b m]e k _c trans=m "*4 ,x _c m9i/] to a m9d diseas$4 ,x _c conv]t ! w f bad to good4 ,x may turn crime into diff]5t *annels1 & r5d] x less easy to detect4 ,x does n *ange man's natural prop5sities or 8 disposition to gratify !m at ! exp5se ( o!rs4 ,k makes ! good man m p[]ful = good1 ! bad man m p[]ful = evil4 ,& t is all x c d40 ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #agd--8,we mu/ n depreciate ! me?od ( argum5t1 = ,jesus & ,paul occasionally us$ x 9 a ,socratic fa%ion1 b we mu/ recognize t x is n ! basis ( ! ,*ri/ian sy/em nor ! prim>y me?od ( ,*ri/ianity40 ,m>t9eau1 9 ,n9ete5? ,c5tury1 #a3cca1 #eca1 & ,types1 #a3aab--8,plato dissolv$ ! idea ( ! "r into t ( ! good1 & ?is aga9 0 indi/+ui%ably m+l$ ) t ( ! true & ! beautiful40 ,see also ,fl9t1 ,!ism1 #cje4 7c7 ,v]sus ,?omas ,pa9e3 8,natural religion tea*es u1 )\t ! possibility ( be+ mi/ak51 all t is necess>y or prop] to be kn[n40 ,plato1 ,laws1 #i3hed1 c1 = sub/ance3 8,be good2 b1 if y _c1 !n kill y\rself40 ,f>r>1 ,d>kness & ,dawn1 #ge--8,plato says t man w nev] "k ,god until ,god has reveal$ himself 9 ! guise ( suff]+ man1 & t1 :5 all is on ! v]ge ( de/ruction1 ,god sees ! di/ress ( ! univ]se1 &1 plac+ himself at ! rudd]1 re/ores x to ord]40 ,prome!us1 ! type ( humanity1 c nev] be deliv]$ 8until "s god desc5ds = him into ! black dep?s ( ,t>t>us40 ,s5eca 9 l mann] tea*es t man _c save himself4 ,he says3 8,d y wond] t m5 g to ! gods8 ,god comes to m51 yes1 into m540 ,we are s9ful1 & ,god's ?\ghts are n z our ?\ghts1 nor 8 ways z our ways4 ,!re=e he mu/ make kn[n 8 ?\ghts to u1 tea* u :at we are1 :at true love is1 & :at w please him4 ,%al]1 ,int]pretation ( ,nature1 #bbg--8,! inculcation ( moral tru?s c be successfully effect$ only 9 ! p]sonal way2 444 x dem&s ! influ5ce ( p]sonality2 444 ! weight ( ! impression dep5ds ^u ! voice & ! eye ( a tea*]40 ,9 o!r words1 we ne$ n only ! ex]cise ( au?ority1 b also ! manife/ation ( love4 ,b4 ,hi/orical pro(4--7a7 ,! k ( moral & religi\s tru? possess$ by nations & ages 9 :i* special revelation is unkn[n is grossly & increas+ly imp]fect4 7b7 ,man's actual condition 9 ante-,*ri/ian times1 & 9 mod]n hea!n l&s1 is t ( extreme moral depravity4 7c7 ,) ?is depravity is f\nd a g5]al conviction ( helplessness1 & on ! "p ( "s nobl] natures1 a long+ aft]1 & hope (1 aid f above4 ,py?agoras3 8,x is n easy to "k duties1 except m5 7 taught !m by ,god himself1 or by "s p]son :o _h receiv$ !m f ,god1 or obta9$ ! k ( !m ?r\gh "s div9e means40 ,socrates3 8,wait ) pati5ce1 till we "k ) c]ta9ty h[ we ought to behave ourselves t[>d ,god & man40 ,plato3 8,we w wait = "o1 be he a ,god or an inspir$ man1 to in/ruct u 9 our duties & to take away ! d>kness f our eyes40 ,disciple ( ,plato3 8,make probability our raft1 :ile we sail ?r\gh life1 unless we c\ld h a m sure & safe conveyance1 su* z "s div9e communication w\ld be40 ,plato ?ank$ ,god = ?ree ?+s3 fir/1 t he 0 born a rational s\l2 secondly1 t he 0 born a ,greek2 &1 ?irdly1 t he liv$ 9 ! days ( ,socrates4 ,yet1 ) all ^! advantages1 he _h only probability = a raft1 on :i* to navigate /range seas ( ?\ght f> beyond 8 dep?1 & he long$ = 8a m sure ^w ( prophecy0 7#b ,pet4 #a3ai74 ,see ref]5ces & quotations 9 ,peabody1 ,*ri/ianity ! ,religion ( ,nature1 #ce1 & 9 ,lu?>dt1 ,fundam5tal ,tru?s1 #aef-agb1 #cce-cch2 ,f>r>1 ,seek]s aft] ,god2 ,g>bett1 ,dogmatic ,fai?1 #ahg4 #b4 ,presumption ( supply4 ,:at we "k ( ,god1 by nature1 af=ds gr\nd = hope t ^! wants ( our intellectual & moral be+ w be met by a correspond+ supply1 9 ! %ape ( a special div9e revelation4 ,we argue ?is3 7a7 ,f our necess>y conviction ( ,god's wisdom4 ,hav+ made man a spiritual be+1 = spiritual ends1 x may be hop$ t he w furni% ! means ne$$ to secure ^! ends4 7b7 ,f ! actual1 ?\gh incomplete1 revelation already giv5 9 nature4 ,s9ce ,god has actually und]tak5 to make himself kn[n to m51 we may hope t he w f9i% ! "w he has begun4 7c7 ,f ! g5]al connection ( want & supply4 ,! high] our ne$s1 ! m intricate & +5i\s are1 9 g5]al1 ! contrivances = meet+ !m4 ,we may !re=e hope t ! highe/ want w be all ! m surely met4 7d7 ,f analogies ( nature & hi/ory4 ,signs ( rep>ative goodness 9 nature & ( =be>ance 9 provid5tial deal+s lead u to hope t1 :ile ju/ice is execut$1 ,god may /ill make kn[n "s way ( re/oration = s9n]s4 7a7 ,!re 7 two /ages 9 ,dr4 ,john ,duncan's escape f pan!ism3 #a4 :5 he came fir/ to believe 9 ! exi/5ce ( ,god1 & 8danc$ = joy ^u ! brig o' ,dee02 & #b4 :51 "u ,malan's influ5ce1 he came also to believe t 8,god meant t we %\ld "k him40 ,9 ! /ory 9 ! old ,village ,read]1 ! "m broke completely d[n :5 %e f\nd t h] son 0 likely to gr[ up /upid1 b h] te>s conqu]$ him & made him intellig5t4 ,laura ,bridgman 0 bl9d1 deaf & dumb1 & _h b small s5se ( ta/e or smell4 ,:5 h] "m1 aft] long sep>ation1 w5t to h] 9 ,bo/on1 ! "m's he>t 0 9 di/ress le/ ! daught] %\ld n recognize h]4 ,:5 at la/1 by "s peculi> "m's sign1 %e pi]c$ ! veil ( ins5sibility1 x 0 a glad "t = bo?4 ,s ,god1 our ,fa!r1 tries to reveal himself to our bl9d1 deaf & dumb s\ls4 ,! agony ( ! ,cross is ! sign ( ,god's di/ress ov] ! ins5sibility ( humanity :i* s9 has caus$4 ,if he is ! ,mak] ( man's be+1 he w surely seek to fit x = t communion ) himself = :i* x 0 design$4 7b7 ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #eb1 #ec--8,nature is a fir/ volume1 9 itself incomplete1 & dem&+ a second volume1 :i* is ,*ri/40 7c7 ,r4 ,t4 ,smi?1 ,man's ,k ( ,man & ( ,god1 #bbh--8,m5dicants d n ply _! call+ = ye>s 9 a des]t :]e !re are no giv]s4 ,en\gh ( supply has be5 receiv$ to keep ! s5se ( want alive40 7d7 ,9 ! natural arrangem5ts = ! heal+ ( bruises 9 plants & = ! m5d+ ( brok5 bones 9 ! animal creation1 9 ! provision ( rem$ial ag5ts = ! cure ( human diseases1 & especially 9 ! delay to inflict puni%m5t ^u ! transgressor & ! space giv5 him = rep5tance1 we h "s indications1 :i*1 if uncontradict$ by o!r evid5ce1 might lead u to reg>d ! ,god ( nature z a ,god ( =be>ance & m]cy4 ,plut>*'s treatise 8,de ,s]a ,num9is ,v9dicta0 is pro( t ?is ?\ght _h occurr$ to ! hea!n4 ,x may be d\bt$1 inde$1 :e!r a hea!n religion c\ld ev5 cont9ue to exi/1 )\t embrac+ 9 x "s elem5t ( hope4 ,yet ?is v delay 9 ! execution ( ! div9e judgm5ts gave its own occasion = d\bt+ ! exi/5ce ( a ,god :o 0 bo? good & j4 8,tru? =ev] on ! scaffold1 ,wrong =ev] on ! ?rone10 is a sc&al to ! div9e gov]nm5t :i* only ! sacrifice ( ,*ri/ c fully remove4 ,! problem pres5ts itself also 9 ! ,old ,te/am5t4 ,9 ,job #ba1 & 9 ,psalms1 #ag1 #cg1 #di1 #gc1 !re are p>tial answ]s2 see ,job #ba3g--8,:]e=e d ! wick$ live1 ,become old1 yea1 wax mighty 9 p[]80 #bd3a--8,:y are n judgm5t times det]m9$ by ! ,almighty8 ,& !y t "k him1 :y see !y n 8 days80 ,! ,new ,te/am5t intimates ! exi/5ce ( a witness to ,god's goodness among ! hea!n1 :ile at ! same "t x decl>es t ! full k ( =giv5ess & salvation is br\ght only by ,*ri/4 ,comp>e ,acts #ad3ag--8;,& yet he left n himself )\t witness1 9 t he did good1 & gave y f heav5 ra9s & fruitful seasons1 fill+ y\r he>ts ) food & gladness02 #ag3be-bg--8;he himself give? to all life1 & brea?1 & all ?+s2 & he made ( "o e nation ( m5 444 t !y %\ld seek ,god1 if haply !y might feel aft] him & f9d him02 ,rom4 #b3d--8! goodness ( ,god leade? !e to rep5tance02 #c3be--8! pass+ ov] ( ! s9s done a=etime1 9 ! =be>ance ( ,god02 ,eph4 #c3i--8to make all m5 see :at is ! disp5sation ( ! my/]y :i* = ages ha? be5 hid 9 ,god02 #b ,tim4 #a3aj--8our ,savior ,*ri/ ,jesus1 :o aboli%$ dea?1 & br\ght life & incorruption to light ?r\gh ! gospel40 ,see ,hackett's edition ( ! treatise ( ,plut>*1 z also ,b[51 ,metaph4 & ,e?ics1 #dfb-dhg2 ,diman1 ,!i/ic ,argum5t1 #cga4 ,we conclude ?is section ^u ! reasons a priori = expect+ a revelation f ,god ) ! ackn[l$gm5t t ! facts w>rant t degree ( expectation :i* we call hope1 r ?an t l>g] degree ( expectation :i* we call assurance2 & ?is1 = ! reason t1 :ile consci5ce gives pro( t ,god is a ,god ( hol9ess1 we h n1 f ! light ( nature1 equal evid5ce t ,god is a ,god ( love4 ,reason tea*es man t1 z a s9n]1 he m]its condemnation2 b he _c1 f reason alone1 "k t ,god w h m]cy ^u him & provide salvation4 ,8 d\bts c be remov$ only by ,god's own voice1 assur+ him ( 8r$emption 444 ! =giv5ess ( 444 trespasses0 7,eph4 #a3g7 & reveal+ to him ! way 9 :i* t =giv5ess has be5 r5d]$ possible4 ,consci5ce kn[s no p>don1 & no ,savior4 ,hovey1 ,manual ( ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #i1 seems to u to g too f> :5 he says3 8,ev5 natural affection & consci5ce af=d "s clue to ! goodness & hol9ess ( ,god1 ?\gh mu* m is ne$$ by "o :o und]takes ! /udy ( ,*ri/ian !ology40 ,we grant t natural affection gives "s clue to ,god's goodness1 b we reg>d consci5ce z reflect+ only ,god's hol9ess & 8 hatr$ ( s94 ,we agree ) ,alex&] ,mc,laren3 8,does ,god's love ne$ to be prov$8 ,yes1 z all paganism %[s4 ,gods vici\s1 gods c>eless1 gods cruel1 gods beautiful1 !re are 9 abundance2 b :]e is !re a god :o loves80 ,,ii4 ,m>ks ( ! ,revelation man may expect4 #a4 ,z to its sub/ance4 ,we may expect ?is lat] revelation n to contradict1 b to confirm & enl>ge1 ! k ( ,god :i* we d]ive f nature1 :ile x rem$ies ! defects ( natural religion & ?r[s light ^u its problems4 ,isaiah's appeal is to ,god's previ\s communications ( tru?3 ,is4 #h3bj--8,to ! law & to ! te/imony6 if !y speak n accord+ to ?is ^w1 surely !re is no morn+ = !m40 ,& ,mala*i foll[s ! example ( ,isaiah2 ,mal4 #d3d--8,rememb] ye ! law ( ,moses my s]vant40 ,our ,"l himself bas$ 8 claims ^u ! =m] utt]ances ( ,god3 ,luke #bd3bg--8;beg9n+ f ,moses & f all ! prophets1 he int]pret$ to !m 9 all ! scriptures ! ?+s conc]n+ himself40 #b4 ,z to its me?od4 ,we may expect x to foll[ ,god's me?ods ( proc$ure 9 o!r communications ( tru?4 ,bi%op ,butl] 7,analogy1 "p ii1 *ap4 iii7 has d5i$ t !re is any possibility ( judg+ a priori h[ a div9e revelation w be giv54 8,we are 9 no sort judges be=eh&10 he says1 8by :at me?ods1 or 9 :at proportion1 x 7 to be expect$ t ?is sup]natural light & in/ruction w\ld be af=d$ u40 ,b ,bi%op ,butl] some:at lat] 9 8 great "w 7"p ii1 *ap4 iv7 %[s t ,god's progressive plan 9 revelation has its analogy 9 ! sl[1 successive /eps by :i* ,god accompli%es 8 ends 9 nature4 ,we ma9ta9 t ! revelation 9 nature af=ds c]ta9 presumptions ) reg>d to ! revelation ( grace1 su* = example z ^? m5tion$ bel[4 ,leslie ,/eph51 9 ,n9ete5? ,c5tury1 ,feb4 #ahia3ahj--8;,butl] answ]$ ! argum5t ( ! dei/s1 t ! ,god ( ,*ri/ianity 0 unju/1 by argu+ t ! ,god ( nature 0 equally unju/4 ,james ,mill1 admitt+ ! analogy1 refus$ to believe 9 ei!r ,god4 ,dr4 ,m>t9eau has said1 = simil> reasons1 t ,butl] #8wrote "o ( ! mo/ t]rible p]suasives to a!ism ev] produc$4' ,s ,j4 ,h4 ,newman's #8kill or cure' argum5t is ess5tially t ,god has ei!r reveal$ no?+1 or has made revelations 9 "s o!r places ?an 9 ! ,bible4 ,8 argum5t1 l ,butl]'s1 may be z good a p]suasive to scepticism z to belief40 ,to ?is indictm5t by ,leslie ,/eph5 we reply t x has cog5cy only s long z we ignore ! fact ( human s94 ,grant+ ?is fact1 our _w becomes a _w ( discipl9e1 probation & r$emption1 & bo? ! ,god ( nature & ! ,god ( ,*ri/ianity are cle>$ f all suspicion ( inju/ice4 ,! analogy betwe5 ,god's me?ods 9 ! ,*ri/ian sy/em & 8 me?ods 9 nature becomes an argum5t 9 favor ( ! =m]4 7a7 ,t ( cont9u\s hi/orical developm5t1--t x w be giv5 9 g]m to e>ly ages1 & w be m fully unfold$ z ! race is prep>$ to receive x4 ,in/ances ( cont9u\s developm5t 9 ,god's imp>tations are f\nd 9 geological hi/ory2 9 ! gr[? ( ! sci5ces2 9 ! progressive education ( ! individual & ( ! race4 ,no o!r religion b ,*ri/ianity %[s 8a /eady hi/orical progress ( ! vision ( "o inf9ite ,"* unfold+ itself to man ?r\gh a p]iod ( _m c5turies40 ,see s]mon by ,dr4 ,temple1 on ! ,education ( ! ,_w1 9 ,essays & ,reviews2 ,rog]s1 ,sup]human ,orig9 ( ! ,bible1 #cgd-chd2 ,walk]1 ,philosophy ( ! ,plan ( ,salvation4 ,on ! gradualness ( revelation1 see ,fi%]1 ,nature & ,me?od ( ,revelation1 #df-hf2 ,ar?ur ,h4 ,hallam1 9 ,john ,br[n's ,rab & 8 ,fri5ds1 #bhb--8,revelation is a gradual approximation ( ! inf9ite ,be+ to ! ways & ?\ghts ( f9ite humanity40 ,a little fire c k9dle a city or a _w2 b t5 times ! heat ( t little fire1 if widely diffus$1 w\ld n k9dle any?+4 7b7 ,t ( orig9al deliv]y to a s+le nation1 & to s+le p]sons 9 t nation1 t x may ?r\gh !m be communicat$ to mank9d4 ,ea* nation repres5ts an idea4 ,z ! ,greek _h a g5ius = lib]ty & beauty1 & ! ,roman a g5ius = organization & law1 s ! ,hebrew nation _h a 8g5ius = religion0 7,r5an72 ?is la/1 h[ev]1 w\ld h be5 useless )\t special div9e aid & sup]9t5d5ce1 z witness o!r productions ( ?is same ,semitic race1 su* z ,bel & ! ,dragon1 9 ! ,old ,te/am5t ,apocrypha2 ! gospels ( ! ,apocryphal ,new ,te/am5t2 & lat] /ill1 ! ,talmud & ! ,koran4 ,! ,o4 ,t4 ,apocrypha relates t1 :5 ,daniel 0 ?r[n a second "t into ! lions' d51 an angel seiz$ ,habakkuk 9 ,judea by ! hair ( 8 head & c>ri$ him ) a b[l ( pottage to give to ,daniel = 8 d9n]4 ,!re 7 sev5 lions1 & ,daniel 0 among !m sev5 days & nights4 ,tobias />ts f 8 fa!r's h\se to secure 8 inh]itance1 & 8 little dog goes ) him4 ,on ! banks ( ! great riv] a great fi% ?reat5s to dev\r him1 b he captures & despoils ! fi%4 ,he f9ally returns successful to 8 fa!r's h\se1 & 8 little dog goes 9 ) him4 ,9 ! ,apocryphal ,gospels1 ,jesus c>ries wat] 9 8 mantle :5 8 pit*] is brok52 makes clay birds on ! ,sabba?1 &1 :5 rebuk$1 causes !m to fly2 /rikes a y\?ful companion ) dea?1 & !n curses 8 accus]s ) bl9dness2 mocks 8 tea*]s1 & res5ts control4 ,lat] ,moslem leg5ds decl>e t ,mohamm$ caus$ d>kness at noon2 :]eupon ! moon flew to him1 w5t sev5 times ar\nd ! ,kaba1 b[$1 ent]$ 8 "r sleeve1 split into two halves aft] slipp+ out at ! left1 & ! two halves1 aft] retir+ to ! extreme ea/ & we/1 7 reunit$4 ,^! products ( ! ,semitic race %[ t nei!r ! influ5ce ( environm5t nor a native g5ius = religion furni%es an adequate explanation ( our ,scriptures4 ,z ! flame on ,elijah's alt> 0 caus$1 n by ! dead /icks1 b by ! fire f heav51 s only ! inspiration ( ! ,almighty c expla9 ! unique revelation ( ! ,old & ,new ,te/am5ts4 ,! ,hebrews saw ,god 9 consci5ce4 ,= ! mo/ g5u9e expression ( _! life we 8mu/ look b5ea? ! surface1 9 ! s\l1 :]e wor%ip & aspiration & prophetic fai? come face to face ) ,god0 7,g5ung1 ,epic ( ! ,inn] ,life1 #bh74 ,b ! ,hebrew religion ne$$ to be supplem5t$ by ! sight ( ,god 9 reason1 & 9 ! beauty ( ! _w4 ,! ,greeks _h ! love ( k1 & ! /hetic s5se4 ,but*]1 ,aspects ( ! ,greek ,g5ius1 #cd--8,! ,phnicians taught ! ,greeks h[ to write1 b x 0 ! ,greeks :o wrote40 ,ari/otle 0 ! beg9n] ( sci5ce1 & outside ! ,aryan race none b ! ,s>ac5s ev] felt ! sci5tific impulse4 ,b ! ,greek made 8 problem cle> by /rik+ all ! unkn[n quantities out ( x4 ,greek ?\ght w\ld nev] h ga9$ univ]sal curr5cy & p]man5ce if x _h n be5 = ,roman jurisprud5ce & imp]ialism4 ,engl& has contribut$ h] con/itutional gov]nm5t1 & ,am]ica h] manhood suffrage & h] religi\s fre$om4 ,s a def9ite ?\ght ( ,god is incorporat$ 9 ea* nation1 & ea* nation has a message to e o!r4 ,acts #ag3bf--;,god 8made ( "o e nation ( m5 to dwell on all ! face ( ! e>?1 hav+ det]m9$ _! appo9t$ seasons1 & ! b\nds ( _! habitation02 ,rom4 #c3ab--8,:at advantage !n ha? ! ,jew8444 fir/ ( all1 t !y 7 entru/$ ) ! oracles ( ,god40 ,god's *oice ( ! ,hebrew nation1 z ! repository & communicator ( religi\s tru?1 is analog\s to 8 *oice ( o!r nations1 z ! repositories & communicators ( /hetic1 sci5tific1 gov]nm5tal tru?4 ,hegel3 8,no nation t has play$ a weighty & active "p 9 ! _w's hi/ory has ev] issu$ f ! simple developm5t ( a s+le race along ! unmodifi$ l9es ( blood-relation%ip4 ,!re mu/ be diff]5ces1 conflicts1 a composition ( oppos$ =ces40 ,! consci5ce ( ! ,hebrew1 ! ?\ght ( ! ,greek1 ! organization ( ! ,lat91 ! p]sonal loyalty ( ! ,teuton1 mu/ all be unit$ to =m a p]fect :ole4 8,:ile ! ,greek *ur* 0 or?odox1 ! ,lat9 *ur* 0 ,ca?olic2 :ile ! ,greek treat$ ( ! two wills 9 ,*ri/1 ! ,lat9 treat$ ( ! h>mony ( our wills ) ,god2 :ile ! ,lat9 sav$ ?r\gh a corporation1 ! ,teuton sav$ ?r\gh p]sonal fai?40 ,br]eton1 9 ,educational ,review1 ,nov4 #aija3cci--8,! problem ( ,france is t ( ! religi\s ord]s2 t ( ,g]many1 ! con/ruction ( society2 t ( ,am]ica1 capital & labor40 ,pfleid]]1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #a3ahc1 #ahd--8;,great ideas nev] come f ! masses1 b f m>k$ individuals4 ,^! ideas1 :5 prop\nd$1 h[ev]1 awak5 an e*o 9 ! masses1 :i* %[s t ! ideas _h be5 slumb]+ unconsci\sly 9 ! s\ls ( o!rs40 ,! h\r /rikes1 & a ,newton appe>s1 :o int]prets ,god's w 9 nature4 ,s ! h\r /rikes1 & a ,moses or a ,paul appe>s1 :o int]prets ,god's w 9 morals & religion4 ,! few gra9s ( :eat f\nd 9 ! clasp$ h& ( ! ,egyptian mummy w\ld h be5 utt]ly lo/ if "o gra9 _h be5 s[n 9 ,europe1 a second 9 ,asia1 a ?ird 9 ,africa1 & a f\r? 9 ,am]ica2 all be+ plant$ toge!r 9 a fl[]-pot1 & _! product 9 a g>d5-b$1 & ! /ill lat] fruit 9 a f>m]'s field1 !re came at la/ to be a suffici5t crop ( new ,m$it]ranean :eat to di/ribute to all ! _w4 ,s ,god foll[$ 8 ord9>y me?od 9 giv+ religi\s tru? fir/ to a s+le nation & to *os5 individuals 9 t nation1 t ?r\gh !m x might be giv5 to all mank9d4 ,see ,briti% ,qu>t]ly1 ,jan4 #ahgd3 art43 ,inductive ,!ology4 7c7 ,t ( pres]vation 9 writt5 & accessible docum5ts1 h&$ d[n f ^? to :om ! revelation is fir/ communicat$4 ,alphabets1 writ+1 books1 are our *ief dep5d5ce = ! hi/ory ( ! pa/2 all ! great religions ( ! _w are book-religions2 ! ,k>5s expect$ _! tea*]s 9 ! new religion to br+ to !m a book4 ,b notice t false religions h scriptures1 b n ,scripture2 _! sacr$ books lack ! pr9ciple ( unity :i* is furni%$ by div9e inspiration4 ,h4 ,p4 ,smi?1 ,biblical ,s*ol>%ip & ,inspiration1 #fh--8,mohamm$ discov]$ t ! ,scriptures ( ! ,jews 7 ! s\rce ( _! religion4 ,he call$ !m a #8book-p1' & endeavor$ to con/ruct a simil> code = 8 disciples4 ,9 x ,god is ! only speak]2 all its cont5ts are made kn[n to ! prophet by direct revelation2 its ,arabic /yle is p]fect2 its text is incorruptible2 x is absolute au?ority 9 law1 sci5ce & hi/ory40 ,! ,koran is a grotesque human p>ody ( ! ,bible2 its exagg]at$ pret5sions ( div9ity1 inde$1 are ! be/ pro( t x is ( purely human orig94 ,scripture1 on ! o!r h&1 makes no su* claims = itself1 b po9ts to ,*ri/ z ! sole & f9al au?ority4 ,9 ?is s5se we may say ) ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #bj--8;,*ri/ianity is n a book-religion1 b a life-religion4 ,! ,bible does n give u ,*ri/1 b ,*ri/ gives u ! ,bible40 ,/ill x is true t = our k ( ,*ri/ we are almo/ :olly dep5d5t ^u ,scripture4 ,9 giv+ 8 revelation to ! _w1 ,god has foll[$ 8 ord9>y me?od ( communicat+ & pres]v+ tru? by means ( writt5 docum5ts4 ,rec5t inve/igations1 h[ev]1 n[ r5d] x probable t ! ,k>5 expectation ( a book 0 ! survival ( ! tea*+ ( ! ,ne/orian mission>ies1 :o z e>ly z ! eigh? c5tury p5etrat$ ! remote/ p>ts ( ,asia1 & left 9 ! wall ( ! city ( ,s+wadu 9 ,nor?we/]n ,*9a a tablet z a monum5t ( _! labors4 ,on book-revelation1 see ,rog]s1 ,eclipse ( ,fai?1 #gc-if1 #bha-cjd4 #c4 ,z to its atte/ation4 ,we may expect t ?is revelation w be accompani$ by evid5ce t its au?or is ! same be+ :om we h previ\sly recogniz$ z ,god ( nature4 ,?is evid5ce mu/ con/itute 7a7 a manife/ation ( ,god himself2 7b7 9 ! outw>d z well z ! inw>d _w2 7c7 su* z only ,god's p[] or k c make2 & 7d7 su* z _c be c\nt]feit$ by ! evil1 or mi/ak5 by ! c&id1 s\l4 ,9 %ort1 we may expect ,god to atte/ by miracles & by prophecy1 ! div9e mission & au?ority ( ^? to :om he communicates a revelation4 ,"s su* outw>d sign w\ld seem to be necess>y1 n only to assure ! orig9al recipi5t t ! suppos$ revelation is n a vag>y ( 8 own imag9ation1 b also to r5d] ! revelation receiv$ by a s+le individual au?oritative to all 7comp>e ,judges #f3ag1 #cf-dj--;,gideon asks a sign1 = himself2 #a ,k4 #ah3cf-ch--;,elijah asks a sign1 = o!rs74 ,b 9 ord] t our positive pro( ( a div9e revelation may n be emb>rass$ by ! suspicion t ! miracul\s & prophetic elem5ts 9 ! ,scripture hi/ory create a presumption aga9/ its cr$ibility1 x w be desirable to take up at ?is po9t ! g5]al subject ( miracles & prophecy4 ,,iii4 ,miracles1 z atte/+ a ,div9e ,revelation4 #a4 ,def9ition ( ,miracle4 ,a4 ,prelim9>y ,def9ition4--,a miracle is an ev5t palpable to ! s5ses1 produc$ = a religi\s purpose by ! imm$iate ag5cy ( ,god2 an ev5t !re=e :i*1 ?\gh n contrav5+ any law ( nature1 ! laws ( nature1 if fully kn[n1 w\ld n )\t ?is ag5cy ( ,god be compet5t to expla94 ,?is def9ition corrects sev]al errone\s conceptions ( ! miracle3--7a7 ,a miracle is n a susp5sion or violation ( natural law2 s9ce natural law is 9 op]ation at ! "t ( ! miracle j z mu* z be=e4 7b7 ,a miracle is n a sudd5 product ( natural ag5cies--a product m]ely =ese51 by him :o appe>s to "w x2 x is ! effect ( a w outside ( nature4 7c7 ,a miracle is n an ev5t )\t a cause2 s9ce x has = its cause a direct volition ( ,god4 7d7 ,a miracle is n an irrational or caprici\s act ( ,god2 b an act ( wisdom1 p]=m$ 9 accordance ) ! immutable laws ( 8 be+1 s t 9 ! same circum/ances ! same c\rse w\ld be aga9 pursu$4 7e7 ,a miracle is n contr>y to exp]i5ce2 s9ce x is n contr>y to exp]i5ce = a new cause to be foll[$ by a new effect4 7f7 ,a miracle is n a matt] ( int]nal exp]i5ce1 l reg5]ation or illum9ation2 b is an ev5t palpable to ! s5ses1 :i* may s]ve z an objective pro( to all t ! work] ( x is div9ely commission$ z a religi\s tea*]4 ,= v>i\s def9itions ( miracles1 see ,alex&]1 ,*ri/ & ,*ri/ianity1 #cjb4 ,on ! :ole subject1 see ,mozley1 ,miracles2 ,*ri/lieb1 ,mod4 ,d\bt & ,*ri/4 ,belief1 #bhe-cci2 ,fi%]1 9 ,pr9ceton ,rev41 ,nov4 #ahhj1 & ,jan4 #ahha2 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,philosophy & ,religion1 #abi-adg1 & 9 ,bapti/ ,review1 ,april1 #ahgi4 ,! def9ition giv5 above is int5d$ simply z a def9ition ( ! miracles ( ! ,bible1 or1 9 o!r words1 ( ! ev5ts :i* pr(ess to atte/ a div9e revelation 9 ! ,scriptures4 ,! ,new ,te/am5t designates ^! ev5ts 9 a two-fold way1 view+ !m ei!r subjectively1 z produc+ effects ^u m51 or objectively1 z reveal+ ! p[] & wisdom ( ,god4 ,9 ! =m] aspect !y are call$ 1 8wond]s10 & 1 8signs10 7,john #d3dh2 ,acts #b3bb74 ,9 ! latt] aspect !y are call$ 1 8p[]s10 & 1 8works10 7,mat #g3bb2 ,john #ad3aa74 ,see ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 ,lect4 on ,apologetics1 #ij-aaf1 esp4 #id--81 sign1 m>k+ ! purpose or object1 ! moral end1 plac+ ! ev5t 9 connection ) revelation40 ,! ,bible ,union ,v]sion uni=mly & prop]ly r5d]s by 8wond]10 by 8miracle10 by 8"w10 & by 8sign40 ,goe!1 ,fau/3 8,alles ,v]gngli*e i/ nur e9 ,glei*niss3 ,das ,unzulngli*e wird hi] ,ereigniss0--8,ev]y?+ transitory is b a p>able2 ,! unatta9able appe>s z solid fact40 ,s ! miracles ( ! ,new ,te/am5t are act$ p>ables1--,*ri/ op5s ! eyes ( ! bl9d to %[ t he is ! ,light ( ! _w1 multiplies ! loaves to %[ t he is ! ,bread ( ,life1 & raises ! dead to %[ t he lifts m5 up f ! dea? ( trespasses & s9s4 ,see ,broadus on ,mat!w1 #age4 ,a modification ( ?is def9ition ( ! miracle1 h[ev]1 is dem&$ by a l>ge class ( ,*ri/ian physici/s1 9 ! suppos$ int]e/ ( natural law4 ,su* a modification is propos$ by ,babbage1 9 ! ,n9? ,bridgewat] ,treatise1 *ap4 viii4 ,babbage illu/rates ! miracle by ! action ( 8 calculat+ ma*9e1 :i* w\ld pres5t to ! obs]v] 9 regul> succession ! s]ies ( units f "o to t5 million1 b :i* w\ld !n make a leap & %[1 n t5 million & "o1 b a hundr$ million2 ,ephraim ,peabody illu/rates ! miracle f ! ca!dral clock :i* /rikes only once 9 a hundr$ ye>s2 yet bo? ^! results are due simply to ! orig9al con/ruction ( ! respective ma*9es4 ,bonnet held ?is view2 see ,dorn]1 ,glaub5slehre1 #a3eia1 #eib2 ,eng4 translation1 #b3aee1 #aef2 s ,mat!w ,arnold1 quot$ 9 ,bruce1 ,miracul\s ,elem5t 9 ,gospels1 #eb2 see also ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,philosophy & ,religion1 #abi-adg4 ,babbage & ,peabody w\ld d5y t ! miracle is due to ! direct & imm$iate ag5cy ( ,god1 & w\ld reg>d x z belong+ to a high] ord] ( nature4 ,god is ! au?or ( ! miracle only 9 ! s5se t he in/itut$ ! laws ( nature at ! beg9n+ & provid$ t at ! appropriate "t miracle %\ld be _! outcome4 ,9 favor ( ?is view x has be5 claim$ t x does n disp5se ) ! div9e work+1 b only puts x fur!r back at ! orig9ation ( ! sy/em1 :ile x /ill holds ,god's "w to be ess5tial1 n only to ! uphold+ ( ! sy/em1 b also to ! inspir+ ( ! religi\s tea*] or lead] ) ! k ne$$ to pr$ict ! unusual work+ ( ! sy/em4 ,! wond] is conf9$ to ! prophecy1 :i* may equally atte/ a div9e revelation4 ,see ,ma!son1 9 ,*ri/ianity & ,evolution1 #a-bf4 ,b x is pla9 t a miracle ( ?is sort lacks to a l>ge degree ! elem5t ( 8signality0 :i* is ne$$1 if x is to accompli% its purpose4 ,x surr5d]s ! great advantage :i* miracle1 z fir/ def9$1 possess$ ov] special provid5ce1 z an atte/ation ( revelation--! advantage1 namely1 t :ile special provid5ce af=ds "s w>rant t ?is revelation comes f ,god1 miracle gives full w>rant t x comes f ,god4 ,s9ce man may by natural means possess himself ( ! k ( physical laws1 ! true miracle :i* ,god works1 & ! pret5d$ miracle :i* only man works1 are ^u ?is !ory f> less easy to di/+ui% f ea* o!r3 ,cortez1 = example1 c\ld deceive ,montezuma by pr$ict+ an eclipse ( ! sun4 ,c]ta9 typical miracles1 l ! resurrection ( ,laz>us1 refuse to be class$ z ev5ts )9 ! realm ( nature1 9 ! s5se 9 :i* ! t]m nature is ord9>ily us$4 ,our ,"l1 moreov]1 seems cle>ly to exclude su* a !ory z ?is1 :5 he says3 8,if ,i by ! f+] ( ,god ca/ out demons0 7,luke #aa3bj72 ,m>k #a3da--8;,i w2 be ?\ made clean40 ,! view ( ,babbage is inadequate1 n only because x fails to recognize any imm$iate ex]cise ( w 9 ! miracle1 b because x reg>ds nature z a m]e ma*9e :i* c op]ate ap>t f ,god--a purely dei/ic me?od ( conception4 ,on ?is view1 _m ( ! products ( m]e natural law might be call$ miracles4 ,! miracle w\ld be only ! occasional manife/ation ( a high] ord] ( nature1 l ! comet occasionally invad+ ! sol> sy/em4 ,william ,eld]1 ,ideas f ,nature3 8,! c5tury-plant :i* we h se5 gr[+ f our *ildhood may n unfold its blossoms until our old age comes ^u u1 b ! sudd5 wond] is natural not)/&+40 ,if1 h[ev]1 we int]pret nature dynamically1 r ?an me*anically1 & reg>d x z ! regul> work+ ( ! div9e w in/ead ( ! automatic op]ation ( a ma*9e1 !re is mu* 9 ?is view :i* we may adopt4 ,miracle may be bo? natural & sup]natural4 ,we may hold1 ) ,babbage1 t x has natural antec$5ts1 :ile at ! same "t we hold t x is produc$ by ! imm$iate ag5cy ( ,god4 ,we proce$ !re=e to an alt]native & pref]able def9ition1 :i* 9 our judgm5t comb9es ! m]its ( bo? t h be5 m5tion$4 ,on miracles z already def9$1 see ,mozley1 ,miracles1 preface1 ix-xxvi1 #g1 #adc-aff2 ,bu%nell1 ,nature & ,sup]natural1 #ccc-ccf2 ,smi?'s & ,ha/+s' ,dict4 ( ,bible1 art43 ,miracles2 ,abp4 ,temple1 ,bampton ,lectures = #ahhd3aic-bba2 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ology1 #a3eda1 #edb4 ,b4 ,alt]native & ,pref]able ,def9ition4--,a miracle is an ev5t 9 nature1 s extraord9>y 9 itself & s co9cid+ ) ! prophecy or comm& ( a religi\s tea*] or lead]1 z fully to w>rant ! conviction1 on ! "p ( ^? :o witness x1 t ,god has wr\ght x ) ! design ( c]tify+ t ?is tea*] or lead] has be5 commission$ by him4 ,?is def9ition has c]ta9 m>k$ advantages z comp>$ ) ! prelim9>y def9ition giv5 above3--7a7 ,x recognizes ! imman5ce ( ,god & 8 imm$iate ag5cy 9 nature1 in/ead ( assum+ an anti!sis betwe5 ! laws ( nature & ! w ( ,god4 7b7 ,x reg>ds ! miracle z simply an extraord9>y act ( t same ,god :o is already pres5t 9 all natural op]ations & :o 9 !m is reveal+ 8 g5]al plan4 7c7 ,x holds t natural law1 z ! me?od ( ,god's regul> activity1 9 no way precludes unique ex]tions ( 8 p[] :5 ^! w be/ secure 8 purpose 9 creation4 7d7 ,x leaves x possible t all miracles may h _! natural explanations & may h]eaft] be trac$ to natural causes1 :ile bo? miracles & _! natural causes may be only names = ! "o & self-same w ( ,god4 7e7 ,x reconciles ! claims ( bo? sci5ce & religion3 ( sci5ce1 by p]mitt+ any possible or probable physical antec$5ts ( ! miracle2 ( religion1 by ma9ta9+ t ^! v antec$5ts toge!r ) ! miracle itself are to be int]pret$ z signs ( ,god's special commission to him "u ^: tea*+ or lead]%ip ! miracle is wr\ght4 ,augu/9e1 :o decl>es t 8,dei voluntas r]um natura e/10 def9es ! miracle 9 ,de ,civitate ,dei1 #ba3h--8,port5tum ergo fit non contra naturam1 s$ contra quam e/ nota natura40 ,he says also t a bir? is m miracul\s ?an a resurrection1 because x is m wond]ful t some?+ t nev] 0 %\ld beg9 to be1 ?an t some?+ t 0 & ceas$ to be %\ld beg9 aga94 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,*ri/4 ,!ology1 #ajd--8,! natural is ,god's "w4 ,he orig9at$ x4 ,!re is no sep>ation betwe5 ! natural & ! sup]natural4 ,! natural is sup]natural4 ,god works 9 ev]y?+4 ,e end1 ev5 ?\gh atta9$ by me*anical means1 is ,god's end z truly z if he wr\ght by miracle40 ,%al]1 ,int]pretation ( ,nature1 #ada1 reg>ds miracle z some?+ exceptional1 yet "u ! control ( natural law2 ! lat5t 9 nature sudd5ly manife/+ itself2 ! revolution result+ f ! sl[ accumulation ( natural =ces4 ,9 ! ,w9dsor ,hotel fire1 ! heat$ & *>r$ woodwork sudd5ly bur/ into flame4 ,flame is v diff]5t f m]e heat1 b x may be ! result ( a regul>ly ris+ temp]ature4 ,nature may be ,god's regul> action1 miracle its unique result4 ,god's regul> action may be entirely free1 & yet its extraord9>y result may be entirely natural4 ,) ^! qualifications & explanations1 we may adopt ! /atem5t ( ,bi$]mann1 ,dogmatik1 #eha-eia--8;,ev]y?+ is miracle1--!re=e fai? sees ,god ev]y:]e2 ,no?+ is miracle1--!re=e sci5ce sees ,god n[h]e40 ,miracles are nev] consid]$ by ! ,scripture writ]s z infractions ( law4 ,bp4 ,s\?ampton1 ,place ( ,miracles1 #ah--8,! ,hebrew hi/orian or prophet reg>d$ miracles z only ! em]g5ce into s5sible exp]i5ce ( t div9e =ce :i* 0 all along1 ?\gh invisibly1 controll+ ! c\rse ( nature40 ,ha/+s1 ,bible ,diction>y1 #d3aag--8,! =ce ( a miracle to u1 aris+ f our notion ( law1 w\ld n be felt by a ,hebrew1 because he _h no notion ( natural law40 ,ps4 #gg3ai1 #bj--8,?y way 0 9 ! sea1 ,& ?y pa?s 9 ! great wat]s1 ,& ?y foot/eps 7 n kn[n0--,!y knew n1 & we "k n1 by :at precise means ! deliv]ance 0 wr\ght1 or by :at precise track ! passage ?r\gh ! ,r$ ,sea 0 effect$2 all we "k is t 8,?\ l$de/ ?y p l a flock1 ,by ! h& ( ,moses & ,a>on40 ,j4 ,m4 ,:iton1 ,miracles & ,sup]natural ,religion3 8,! sup]natural is 9 nature itself1 at its v he>t1 at its v life2 444 n an outside p[] int]f]+ ) ! c\rse ( nature1 b an inside p[] vitaliz+ nature & op]at+ ?r\gh x40 ,griffi?-,jones1 ,asc5t ?r\gh ,*ri/1 #ce--8,miracle1 in/ead ( spell+ #8mon/]'1 z ,em]son said1 simply be>s witness to "s o!rwise unkn[n or unrecogniz$ aspect ( ! div9e "*40 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3ecc--8,to cause ! sun to rise & to cause ,laz>us to rise1 bo? dem& omnipot5ce2 b ! mann] 9 :i* omnipot5ce works 9 "o in/ance is unlike ! mann] 9 ! o!r40 ,miracle is an imm$iate op]ation ( ,god2 b1 s9ce all natural processes are also imm$iate op]ations ( ,god1 we d n ne$ to d5y ! use ( ^! natural processes1 s f> z !y w g1 9 miracle4 ,su* wond]s ( ! ,old ,te/am5t z ! ov]?r[ ( ,sodom & ,gomorrah1 ! p>t+s ( ! ,r$ ,sea & ( ! ,jordan1 ! call+ d[n ( fire f heav5 by ,elijah & ! de/ruction ( ! army ( ,s5na*]ib1 are none ! less works ( ,god :5 reg>d$ z wr\ght by ! use ( natural means4 ,9 ! ,new ,te/am5t ,*ri/ took wat] to make w9e1 & took ! five loaves to make bread1 j z 9 t5 ?\s& v9ey>ds to-day he is turn+ ! moi/ure ( ! e>? into ! juice ( ! grape1 & 9 t5 ?\s& fields is turn+ c>bon into corn4 ,! virg9-bir? ( ,*ri/ may be an extreme in/ance ( p>!nog5esis1 :i* ,pr(essor ,loeb ( ,*icago has j demon/rat$ to take place 9 o!r ?an ! l[e/ =ms ( life & :i* he believes to be possible 9 all4 ,*ri/'s resurrection may be an illu/ration ( ! p[] ( ! normal & p]fect human _s to take to itself a prop] body1 & s may be ! type & prophecy ( t great *ange :5 we too %all lay d[n our life & take x aga94 ,! sci5ti/ may yet f9d t 8 disbelief is n only disbelief 9 ,*ri/1 b also disbelief 9 sci5ce4 ,all miracle may h its natural side1 ?\gh we n[ are n able to disc]n x2 &1 if ?is 7 true1 ! ,*ri/ian argum5t w\ld n "o :it be weak5$1 = /ill miracle w\ld evid5ce ! extraord9>y work+ ( ! imman5t ,god1 & ! imp>tation ( 8 k to ! prophet or apo/le :o 0 8 in/rum5t4 ,?is view ( ! miracle r5d]s entirely unnecess>y & irrational ! treatm5t accord$ to ! ,scripture n>ratives by "s mod]n !ologians4 ,!re is a cr$ulity ( scepticism1 :i* m9imizes ! miracul\s elem5t 9 ! ,bible & treats x z my?ical or leg5d>y1 9 spite ( cle> evid5ce t x belongs to ! realm ( actual hi/ory4 ,pfleid]]1 ,philos4 ,relig41 #a3bie--8,miracul\s leg5ds arise 9 two ways1 p>tly out ( ! idealiz+ ( ! real1 & p>tly out ( ! realiz+ ( ! ideal4444 ,e occurr5ce may obta9 = ! religi\s judgm5t ! significance ( a sign or pro( ( ! _w-gov]n+ p[]1 wisdom1 ju/ice or goodness ( ,god4444 ,miracul\s hi/ories are a poetic realiz+ ( religi\s ideas40 ,pfleid]] quotes ,goe!'s apo!gm3 8,miracle is fai?'s de>e/ *ild40 ,fo/]1 ,f9ality ( ! ,*ri/ian ,religion1 #abh-ach--8,we mo/ honor biblical miracul\s n>ratives :5 we seek to und]/& !m z poesies40 ,rits*l def9es miracles z 8^? /rik+ natural occurr5ces ) :i* ! exp]i5ce ( ,god's special help is connect$40 ,he leaves d\btful ! bodily resurrection ( ,*ri/1 & _m ( 8 s*ool d5y x2 see ,mead1 ,rits*l's ,place 9 ! ,hi/ory ( ,doctr9e1 #aa4 ,we d n ne$ to int]pret ,*ri/'s resurrection z a m]e appe>ance ( 8 _s to ! disciples4 ,gladd51 ,sev5 ,puzzl+ ,books1 #bjb--8;,9 ! h&s ( p]fect & spiritual man1 ! =ces ( nature are pliant & tractable z !y are n 9 ours4 ,! resurrection ( ,*ri/ is only a sign ( ! sup]iority ( ! life ( ! p]fect _s ov] ext]nal conditions4 ,x may be p]fectly 9 accordance ) nature40 ,my]s1 ,human ,p]sonality1 #b3bhh--8;,i pr$ict t1 9 consequ5ce ( ! new evid5ce1 all reasonable m51 a c5tury h5ce1 w believe ! resurrection ( ,*ri/40 ,we may add t ,jesus himself intimates t ! work+ ( miracles is h]eaft] to be a common & natural manife/ation ( ! new life :i* he imp>ts3 ,john #ad3ab--8;,he t believe? on me1 ! works t ,i d %all he d also2 & great] works ?an ^! %all he d1 because ,i g unto ! ,fa!r40 ,we app5d a numb] ( op9ions1 anci5t & mod]n1 ) reg>d to miracles1 all t5d+ to %[ ! ne$ ( s def9+ !m z n to conflict ) ! j claims ( sci5ce4 ,ari/otle3 8,nature is n full ( episodes1 l a bad trag$y40 ,%akespe>e1 ,all's ,well t ,ends ,well1 #b3c3a--8,!y say miracles are pa/2 & we h our philosophical p]sons to make mod]n & famili> ?+s sup]natural & causeless4 ,h5ce x is t we make trifles ( t]rors1 enscons+ ourselves into seem+ k1 :5 we %\ld submit ourselves to an unkn[n fe>40 ,keats1 ,lamia3 8,!re 0 an awful ra9b[ once 9 heav52 ,we "k h] wo(1 h] texture3 %e is giv5 ,9 ! dull catalogue ( common ?+s40 ,hill1 ,g5etic ,philosophy1 #ccd--8;,biological & psy*ological sci5ce unite 9 affirm+ t e ev5t1 organic or psy*ic1 is to be expla9$ 9 ! t]ms ( its imm$iate antec$5ts1 & t x c be s expla9$4 ,!re is !re=e no necessity1 !re is ev5 no room1 = int]f]5ce4 ,if ! exi/5ce ( a ,deity dep5ds ^u ! evid5ce ( int]v5tion & sup]natural ag5cy1 fai? 9 ! div9e seems to be de/roy$ 9 ! sci5tific m9d40 ,!odore ,p>k]3 8,no :im 9 ,god1--!re=e no miracle 9 nature40 ,arm\r1 ,atonem5t & ,law1 #ae-cc--8,! miracle ( r$emption1 l all miracles1 is by int]v5tion ( adequate p[]1 n by susp5sion ( law4 ,r$emption is n #8! great exception4' ,x is ! fulle/ revelation & v9dication ( law40 ,gore1 9 ,lux ,mundi1 #cbj--8,r$emption is n natural b sup]natural--sup]natural1 t is1 9 view ( ! false nature :i* man made = himself by exclud+ ,god4 ,o!rwise1 ! "w ( r$emption is only ! recon/itution ( ! nature :i* ,god _h design$40 ,abp4 ,tr5*3 8,! _w ( nature is ?r\gh\t a witness = ! _w ( _s1 proce$+ f ! same h&1 gr[+ out ( ! same root1 & be+ con/itut$ = ?is v end4 ,! *>act]s ( nature :i* ev]y:]e meet ! eye are n a common b a sacr$ writ+1--!y are ! hi]oglyphics ( ,god40 ,pascal3 8,nature is ! image ( grace40 ,presid5t ,m>k ,hopk9s3 8,*ri/ianity & p]fect ,reason are id5tical40 ,see ,mead1 ,sup]natural ,revelation1 #ig-abc2 art43 ,miracle1 by ,b]n>d1 9 ,ha/+s' ,diction>y ( ! ,bible4 ,! mod]n & improv$ view ( ! miracle is p]haps be/ pres5t$ by ,t4 ,h4 ,wright1 ,! ,f+] ( ,god2 & by ,w4 ,n4 ,rice1 ,*ri/ian ,fai? 9 an ,age ( ,sci5ce1 #ccf4 #b4 ,possibility ( ,miracle4 ,an ev5t 9 nature may be caus$ by an ag5t 9 nature yet above nature4 ,?is is evid5t f ! foll[+ consid]ations3 7a7 ,l[] =ces & laws 9 nature are frequ5tly c\nt]act$ & transc5d$ by ! high] 7z me*anical =ces & laws by *emical1 & *emical by vital71 :ile yet ! l[] =ces & laws are n susp5d$ or annihilat$1 b are m]g$ 9 ! high]1 & made to assi/ 9 accompli%+ purposes to :i* !y are altoge!r unequal :5 left to !mselves4 ,by nature we mean nature 9 ! prop] s5se--n 8ev]y?+ t is n ,god10 b 8ev]y?+ t is n ,god or made 9 ! image ( ,god02 see ,hopk9s1 ,outl9e ,/udy ( ,man1 #beh1 #bei4 ,man's w does n belong to nature1 b is above nature4 ,on ! transc5d+ ( l[] =ces by high]1 see ,murphy1 ,habit & ,intellig5ce1 #a3hh4 ,james ,rob]tson1 ,e>ly ,religion ( ,israel1 #bc--8;,is x impossible t !re %\ld be unique ?+s 9 ! _w8 ,is x sci5tific to ass]t t !re are n80 ,ladd1 ,philosophy ( ,k1 #djf--8,:y does n ! project+ "p ( ! cop+-/one fall1 9 ob$i5ce to ! law ( gravitation1 f ! top ( yond] build+8 ,because1 z physics decl>es1 ! =ces ( cohesion1 act+ "u q diff]5t laws1 ?w>t & oppose = ! "t be+ ! law ( gravitation4444 ,b n[1 aft] a fro/y night1 ! cop+-/one actually breaks (f & tumbles to ! gr\nd2 = t unique law :i* makes wat] =cibly exp& at #cb ,fahr5heit has contradict$ ! laws ( cohesion & has re/or$ to ! law ( gravitation its tempor>ily susp5d$ rights ov] ?is mass ( matt]40 ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #dh--8;,evolution views nature z a progressive ord] 9 :i* !re are new dep>tures1 fre% levels won1 ph5om5a unkn[n be=e4 ,:5 organic life appe>$1 ! future did n resemble ! pa/4 ,s :5 man came4 ,*ri/ is a new nature--! creative ,^w made fle%4 ,x is to be expect$ t1 z new nature1 he w exhibit new ph5om5a4 ,new vital en]gy w radiate f him1 controll+ ! mat]ial =ces4 ,miracles are ! prop] accompanim5ts ( 8 p]son40 ,we may add t1 z ,*ri/ is ! imman5t ,god1 he is pres5t 9 nature :ile at ! same "t he is above nature1 & he ^: /eady w is ! ess5ce ( all natural law c transc5d all pa/ ex]tions ( t w4 ,! inf9ite ,"o is n a be+ ( endless monotony4 ,william ,eld]1 ,ideas f ,nature1 #aef--8;,god is n b\nd hopelessly to 8 process1 l ,ixion to 8 :eel40 7b7 ,! human w acts ^u its physical organism1 & s ^u nature1 & produces results :i* nature left to h]self nev] c\ld accompli%1 :ile yet no law ( nature is susp5d$ or violat$4 ,gravitation /ill op]ates ^u ! axe1 ev5 :ile man holds x at ! surface ( ! wat]--= ! axe /ill has weight 7cf4 #b ,k4 #f3e-g74 ,v]sus ,hume1 ,philos4 ,works1 #d3acj--8;,a miracle is a violation ( ! laws ( nature40 ,*ri/ian apologi/s h too (t5 ne$lessly emb>rass$ _! argum5t by accept+ ,hume's def9ition4 ,! /igma is entirely undes]v$4 ,if man c support ! axe at ! surface ( ! wat] :ile gravitation /ill acts ^u x1 ,god c c]ta9ly1 at ! prophet's ^w1 make ! iron to swim1 :ile gravitation /ill acts ^u x4 ,b ?is la/ is miracle4 ,see ,mansel1 ,essay on ,miracles1 9 ,aids to ,fai?1 #bf1 #bg3 ,aft] ! greate/ wave ( ! season has l&$ its pebble high up on ! bea*1 ,i c move ! pebble a foot fur!r )\t alt]+ ! =ce ( w9d or wave or climate 9 a di/ant cont95t4 ,fi%]1 ,sup]nat4 ,orig9 ( ,*ri/ianity1 #dga2 ,hamilton1 ,autology1 #fhe-fij2 ,b[51 ,metaph4 & ,e?ics1 #dde2 ,r[1 ,bampton ,lectures on ,*ri/ian ,evid5ces1 #ed-gd2 ,a4 ,a4 ,hodge3 ,pull+ out a new /op ( ! organ does n susp5d ! work+ or de/roy ! h>mony ( ! o!r /ops4 ,! pump does n susp5d ! law ( gravitation1 nor does our ?r[+ a ball into ! air4 ,if gravitation did n act1 ! upw>d velocity ( ! ball w\ld n dim9i% & ! ball w\ld nev] return4 8,gravitation draws iron d[n4 ,b ! magnet ov]comes t attraction & draws ! iron up4 ,yet "h is no susp5sion or violation ( law1 b r a h>moni\s work+ ( two laws1 ea* 9 its sph]e4 ,dea? & n life is ! ord] ( nature4 ,b m5 live not)/&+4 ,life is sup]natural4 ,only z a =ce additional to m]e nature works aga9/ nature does life exi/4 ,s spiritual life uses & transc5ds ! laws ( nature0 7,sunday ,s*ool ,times74 ,gladd51 ,:at ,is ,left8 #fj--8,:]ev] y f9d ?\ght1 *oice1 love1 y f9d some?+ t is n "u ! dom9ion ( fix$ law4 ,^! are ! attributes ( a free p]sonality40 ,william ,james3 8,we ne$ to sub/itute ! p]sonal view ( life = ! imp]sonal & me*anical view4 ,me*anical rationalism is n>r[ness & p>tial induction ( facts1--x is n sci5ce40 7c7 ,9 all free causation1 !re is an act+ )\t means4 ,man acts ^u ext]nal nature ?r\gh 8 physical organism1 b1 9 mov+ 8 physical organism1 he acts directly ^u matt]4 ,9 o!r words1 ! human w c use means1 only because x has ! p[] ( act+ initially )\t means4 ,see ,hopk9s1 on ,pray]-gauge1 #aj1 & 9 ,pr9ceton ,review1 ,sept4 #ahhb3ahh4 ,a4 ,j4 ,balf\r1 ,f\ndations ( ,belief1 #caa--8,n ,div9ity alone int]v5es 9 ! _w ( ?+s4 ,ea* liv+ s\l1 9 its measure & degree1 does ! same40 ,ea* s\l t acts 9 any way on its surr\nd+s does s on ! pr9ciple ( ! miracle4 ,phillips ,brooks1 ,life1 #b3cej--8,! mak+ ( all ev5ts miracul\s is no m an abolition ( miracle ?an ! flood+ ( ! _w ) sun%9e is an ext9ction ( ! sun40 ,george ,adam ,smi?1 on ,is4 #cc3ad--8;dev\r+ fire 444 ev]la/+ burn+s03 8,if we look at a conflagration ?r\gh smok$ glass1 we see build+s collaps+1 b we see no fire4 ,s sci5ce sees results1 b n ! p[] :i* produces !m2 sees cause & effect1 b does n see ,god40 ,p4 ,s4 ,h5son3 8,! curr5t 9 an electric wire is invisible s long z x circulates uni=mly4 ,b cut ! wire & ins]t a piece ( c>bon betwe5 ! two brok5 ends1 & at once y h an arc-light t drives away ! d>kness4 ,s miracle is only ! mom5t>y int]ruption 9 ! op]ation ( uni=m laws1 :i* ?us gives light to ! ages10--or1 let u say r1 ! mom5t>y *ange 9 ! me?od ( _! op]ation :]eby ! w ( ,god takes a new =m ( manife/ation4 ,pfleid]]1 ,grundriss1 #ajj--8,sp9oza leugnete ihre metaphysis*e ,mgli*keit1 ,hume ihre ges*i*tli*e ,erk5nb>keit1 ,kant ihre practis*e ,brau*b>keit1 ,s*lei]ma*] ihre religise ,b$eutsamkeit1 ,hegel ihre gei/ige ,beweiskraft1 ,fi*te ihre wahre ,*ri/li*keit1 und die kritis*e ,!ologie ihre wahre ,ges*i*tli*keit40 7d7 ,:at ! human w1 consid]$ z a sup]natural =ce1 & :at ! *emical & vital =ces ( nature itself1 are demon/rably able to accompli%1 _c be reg>d$ z beyond ! p[] ( ,god1 s long z ,god dwells 9 & controls ! univ]se4 ,if man's w c act directly ^u matt] 9 8 own physical organism1 ,god's w c "w imm$iately ^u ! sy/em :i* he has creat$ & :i* he su/a9s4 ,9 o!r words1 if !re be a ,god1 & if he be a p]sonal be+1 miracles are possible4 ,! impossibility ( miracles c be ma9ta9$ only ^u pr9ciples ( a!ism or pan!ism4 ,see ,we/cott1 ,gospel ( ! ,resurrection1 #ai2 ,cox1 ,miracles1 an ,argum5t & a ,*all5ge3 8,an?ropomorphism is pref]able to hylomorphism40 ,newman ,smy?1 ,old ,fai?s 9 a ,new ,light1 *4 #a--8;,a miracle is n a sudd5 bl[ /ruck 9 ! face ( nature1 b a use ( nature1 accord+ to its inh]5t capacities1 by high] p[]s40 ,see also ,gloatz1 ,wund] und ,naturgesetz1 9 ,/udi5 und ,kritik51 #ahhf3djc-edf2 ,gunsaulus1 ,transfiguration ( ,*ri/1 #ah1 #ai1 #bf2 ,&ov] ,review1 on 8,rob]t ,elsm]e10 #ahhh3cjc2 ,w4 ,e4 ,glad/one1 9 ,n9ete5? ,c5tury1 #ahhh3gff-ghh2 ,dubois1 on ,sci5ce & ,miracle1 9 ,new ,engl&]1 ,july1 #ahhi3a-cb--,?ree po/ulates3 7#a7 ,e p>ticle attracts e o!r 9 ! univ]se2 7#b7 ,man's w is free2 7#c7 ,e volition is accompani$ by correspond+ bra9-action4 ,h5ce e volition ( ours causes *anges ?r\gh\t ! :ole univ]se2 also1 9 ,c5tury ,magaz9e1 ,dec4 #ahid3bbi--;,conditions are nev] twice ! same 9 nature2 all ?+s are ! results ( w1 s9ce we "k t ! lea/ ?\ght ( ours %akes ! univ]se2 miracle is simply ! action ( w 9 unique conditions2 ! beg9n+ ( life1 ! orig9 ( consci\sness1 ^! are miracles1 yet !y are /rictly natural2 pray] & ! m9d t frames x are conditions :i* ! ,m9d 9 nature _c ignore4 ,cf4 ,ps4 #aae3c--8our ,god is 9 ! heav5s3 ,he ha? done :atsoev] he pleas$0 8 almighty p[] & fre$om d away ) all a priori objections to miracles4 ,if ,god is n a m]e =ce1 b a p]son1 !n miracles are possible4 7e7 ,?is possibility ( miracles becomes d\bly sure to ^? :o see 9 ,*ri/ none o!r ?an ! imman5t ,god manife/$ to creatures4 ,! ,logos or div9e ,reason :o is ! pr9ciple ( all gr[? & evolution c make ,god kn[n only by means ( successive new imp>tations ( 8 en]gy4 ,s9ce all progress implies increm5t1 & ,*ri/ is ! only s\rce ( life1 ! :ole hi/ory ( creation is a witness to ! possibility ( miracle4 ,see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #afc-aff--8,?is conception ( evolution is t ( ,lotze4 ,t great philosoph]1 ^: influ5ce is m pot5t ?an any o!r 9 pres5t ?\ght1 does n reg>d ! univ]se z a pl5um to :i* no?+ c be add$ 9 ! way ( =ce4 ,he looks ^u ! univ]se r z a pla/ic organism to :i* new impulses c be imp>t$ f him ( ^: ?\ght & w x is an expression4 ,^! impulses1 once imp>t$1 abide 9 ! organism & are !reaft] subject to its law4 ,?\gh ^! impulses come f )91 !y come n f ! f9ite me*anism b f ! imman5t ,god4 ,rob]t ,br[n+'s phrase1 #8,all's love1 b all's law1' mu/ be int]pret$ z mean+ t ! v movem5ts ( ! planets & all ! op]ations ( nature are revelations ( a p]sonal & pres5t ,god1 b x mu/ n be int]pret$ z mean+ t ,god runs 9 a rut1 t he is conf9$ to me*anism1 t he is incapable ( unique & />tl+ manife/ations ( p[]4 8,! idea t gives to evolution its hold ^u ?9k+ m9ds is ! idea ( cont9uity4 ,b absolute cont9uity is inconsi/5t ) progress4 ,if ! future is n simply a reproduction ( ! pa/1 !re mu/ be "s new cause ( *ange4 ,9 ord] to progress !re mu/ be ei!r a new =ce1 or a new comb9ation ( =ces1 & ! new comb9ation ( =ces c be expla9$ only by "s new =ce t causes ! comb9ation4 ,?is new =ce1 moreov]1 mu/ be intellig5t =ce1 if ! evolution is to be t[>d ! bett] in/ead ( t[>d ! worse4 ,! cont9uity mu/ be cont9uity n ( =ces b ( plan4 ,! =ces may increase1 nay1 !y mu/ increase1 unless ! new is to be a m]e repetition ( ! old4 ,!re mu/ be additional en]gy imp>t$1 ! new comb9ation br\ght ab\t1 & all ?is implies purpose & w4 ,b ?r\gh all !re runs "o cont9u\s plan1 & ^u ?is plan ! rationality ( evolution dep5ds4 8,a man builds a h\se4 ,9 lay+ ! f\ndation he uses /one & mort>1 b he makes ! walls ( wood & ! ro( ( t94 ,9 ! sup]/ructure he br+s into play diff]5t laws f ^? :i* apply to ! f\ndation4 ,!re is cont9uity1 n ( mat]ial1 b ( plan4 ,progress f cell> to g>ret requires breaks "h & !re1 & ! br++ 9 ( new =ces2 9 fact1 )\t ! br++ 9 ( ^! new =ces ! evolution ( ! h\se w\ld be impossible4 ,n[ sub/itute = ! f\ndation & sup]/ructure liv+ ?+s l ! *rysalis & ! butt]fly2 imag9e ! p[] to "w f )9 & n f )\t2 & y see t true cont9uity does n exclude b involves new beg9n+s4 8,evolution1 !n1 dep5ds on increm5ts ( =ce plus cont9uity ( plan4 ,new creations are possible because ! imman5t ,god has n exhau/$ himself4 ,miracle is possible because ,god is n f> away1 b is at h& to d :atev] ! ne$s ( 8 moral univ]se may require4 ,reg5]ation & answ]s to pray] are possible = ! v reason t ^! are ! objects = :i* ! univ]se 0 built4 ,if we 7 dei/s1 believ+ 9 a di/ant ,god & a me*anical univ]se1 evolution & ,*ri/ianity w\ld be irreconcilable4 ,b s9ce we believe 9 a dynamical univ]se1 ( :i* ! p]sonal & liv+ ,god is ! inn] s\rce ( en]gy1 evolution is b ! basis1 f\ndation & backgr\nd ( ,*ri/ianity1 ! sil5t & regul> work+ ( him :o1 9 ! fulness ( "t1 utt]s 8 voice 9 ,*ri/ & ! ,cross40 ,lotze's own /atem5t ( 8 position may be f\nd 9 8 ,microcosmos1 #b3dgi sq4 ,pr(essor ,james ,t5 ,broeke has int]pret$ him z foll[s3 8,he makes ! possibility ( ! miracle dep5d ^u ! close & intimate action & reaction betwe5 ! _w & ! p]sonal ,absolute1 9 consequ5ce ( :i* ! movem5ts ( ! natural _w are c>ri$ on only ?r\gh ! ,absolute1 ) ! possibility ( a v>iation 9 ! g5]al c\rse ( ?+s1 accord+ to exi/+ facts & ! purpose ( ! div9e ,gov]nor40 #c4 ,probability ( ,miracles4 ,a4 ,we ackn[l$ge t1 s long z we conf9e our att5tion to nature1 !re is a presumption aga9/ miracles4 ,exp]i5ce te/ifies to ! uni=mity ( natural law4 ,a g5]al uni=mity is ne$ful1 9 ord] to make possible a rational calculation ( ! future1 & a prop] ord]+ ( life4 ,see ,butl]1 ,analogy1 "p ii1 *ap4 ii2 ,f4 ,w4 ,f>r>1 ,witness ( ,hi/ory to ,*ri/1 #c-de2 ,mod]n ,scepticism1 #a3agi-bbg2 ,*alm]s1 ,*ri/ian ,revelation1 #a3dg4 ,g4 ,d4 ,b4 ,pepp]3 8,:]e !re is no law1 no settl$ ord]1 !re c be no miracle4 ,! miracle presupposes ! law1 & ! importance assign$ to miracles is ! recognition ( ! reign ( law4 ,b ! mak+ & laun*+ ( a %ip may be gov]n$ by law1 no less ?an ! sail+ ( ! %ip aft] x is laun*$4 ,s ! introduction ( a high] spiritual ord] into a m]ely natural ord] con/itutes a new & unique ev5t40 ,"s ,*ri/ian apologi/s h err$ 9 affirm+ t ! miracle 0 antec$5tly z probable z any o!r ev5t1 :]eas only its antec$5t improbability gives x value z a pro( ( revelation4 ,horace3 8,nec deus int]sit1 nisi dignus v9dice nodus ,incid]it40 ,b4 ,b we d5y t ?is uni=mity ( nature is absolute & univ]sal4 7a7 ,x is n a tru? ( reason t c h no exceptions1 l ! axiom t a :ole is great] ?an its p>ts4 7b7 ,exp]i5ce c\ld n w>rant a belief 9 absolute & univ]sal uni=mity1 unless exp]i5ce 7 id5tical ) absolute & univ]sal k4 7c7 ,we "k1 on ! contr>y1 f geology1 t !re h be5 breaks 9 ?is uni=mity1 su* z ! introduction ( vegetable1 animal & human life1 :i* _c be acc\nt$ =1 except by ! manife/ation 9 nature ( a sup]natural p[]4 7a7 ,comp>e ! probability t ! sun w rise to-morr[ morn+ ) ! c]ta9ty t two & two make f\r4 ,huxley1 ,lay ,s]mons1 #aeh1 indignantly d5ies t !re is any 8mu/0 ab\t ! uni=mity ( nature3 8,no "o is entitl$ to say a priori t any giv5 s-call$ miracul\s ev5t is impossible40 ,w>d1 ,naturalism & ,agno/icism1 #a3hd--8,!re is no evid5ce = ! /atem5t t ! mass ( ! univ]se is a def9ite & un*angeable quantity02 #ajh1 #aji--8,:y s confid5tly assume t a rigid & monoton\s uni=mity is ! only1 or ! highe/1 indication ( ord]1 ! ord] ( an ev] liv+ ,_s1 above all8 ,h[ is x t we depreciate ma*9e-made articles1 & pref] ^? 9 :i* ! arti/ic impulse1 or ! fitness ( ! individual case1 is free to %ape & to make :at is lit]ally manufactur$1 h&-made8444 ,dang]\s z teleological argum5ts 9 g5]al may be1 we may at lea/ safely say ! _w 0 n design$ to make sci5ce easy4444 ,to call ! v]ses ( a poet1 ! politics ( a /atesman1 or ! aw>d ( a judge me*anical1 implies1 z ,lotze has po9t$ out1 m>k$ disp>agem5t1 al?\gh x implies1 too1 precisely ^? *>act]i/ics--exactness & inv>iability--9 :i* ,maxwell w\ld h u see a tok5 ( ! div9e40 ,surely !n we mu/ n insi/ t div9e wisdom mu/ always run 9 a rut1 mu/ ev] repeat itself1 mu/ nev] exhibit itself 9 unique acts l inc>nation & resurrection4 ,see ,edw>d ,hit*cock1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #bj3dhi-efa1 on 8,! ,law ( ,nature's ,con/ancy ,subord9ate to ! ,high] ,law ( ,*ange02 ,jevons1 ,pr9ciples ( ,sci5ce1 #b3dcj-dch2 ,mozley1 ,miracles1 #bf4 7b7 ,s4 ,t4 ,col]idge1 ,table ,talk1 #ah ,decemb]1 #ahca--8,! light :i* exp]i5ce gives u is a lant]n on ! /]n ( ! %ip1 :i* %9es only on ! waves beh9d u40 ,hobbes3 8,exp]i5ce conclude? no?+ univ]sally40 ,brooks1 ,f\ndations ( ,zology1 #aca--8;,evid5ce c tell u only :at has happ5$1 & x c nev] assure u t ! future mu/ be l ! pa/2 #acb--,pro( t all nature is me*anical w\ld n be inconsi/5t ) ! belief t ev]y?+ 9 nature is imm$iately su/a9$ by ,provid5ce1 & t my volition c\nts = some?+ 9 det]m9+ ! c\rse ( ev5ts40 ,royce1 ,_w & ,individual1 #b3bjd--8,uni=mity is n absolute4 ,nature is a va/] realm ( life & mean+1 ( :i* we m5 =m a "p1 & ( :i* ! f9al unity is 9 ,god's life4 ,! rhy?m ( ! he>t-beat has its normal regul>ity1 yet its limit$ p]si/5ce4 ,nature may be m]ely ! habits ( free w4 ,e region ( ?is univ]sally consci\s _w may be a c5tre :5ce issues new consci\s life = communication to all ! worlds40 ,pr9cipal ,fairbairn3 8,nature is ,_s40 ,we pref] to say3 8,nature is ! manife/ation ( _s1 ! regul>ities ( fre$om40 7c7 ,o!r breaks 9 ! uni=mity ( nature are ! com+ ( ,*ri/ & ! reg5]ation ( a human s\l4 ,h>nack1 ,:at is ,*ri/ianity1 #ah1 holds t ?\gh !re are no int]ruptions to ! work+ ( natural law1 natural law is n yet fully kn[n4 ,:ile !re are no miracles1 !re is pl5ty ( ! miracul\s4 ,! p[] ( m9d ov] matt] is beyond our pres5t conceptions4 ,b[ne1 ,philosophy ( ,!ism1 #baj--,! effects are no m consequ5ces ( ! laws ?an ! laws are consequ5ces ( ! effects bo? laws & effects are ex]cises ( div9e w4 ,k+1 ,recon/ruction 9 ,!ology1 #ef--,we mu/ hold1 n to ! uni=mity ( law1 b to ! univ]sality ( law2 = evolution has successive /ages ) new laws com+ 9 & becom+ dom9ant t _h n be=e appe>$4 ,! new & high] /age is practically a miracle f ! po9t ( view ( ! l[]4 ,see ,briti% ,qu>t]ly ,review1 ,oct4 #ahha3aed2 ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy1 #b3bjj1 #bjc1 #bji4 ,c4 ,s9ce ! inwork+ ( ! moral law into ! con/itution & c\rse ( nature %[s t nature exi/s1 n = itself1 b = ! contemplation & use ( moral be+s1 x is probable t ! ,god ( nature w produce effects aside f ^? ( natural law1 :5ev] !re are suffici5tly important moral ends to be s]v$ !reby4 ,b5ea? ! expectation ( uni=mity is ! intuition ( f9al cause2 ! =m] may !re=e give way to ! latt]4 ,see ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #eib-fae--;,effici5t causes & f9al causes may conflict1 & !n ! effici5t give place to ! f9al4 ,?is is miracle4 ,see ,hutton1 9 ,n9ete5? ,c5tury1 ,aug4 #ahhe1 & ,*ann+1 ,evid5ces ( ,reveal$ ,religion1 quot$ 9 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3ecd1 #ece--8,! ord] ( ! univ]se is a means1 n an end1 & l all o!r means mu/ give way :5 ! end c be be/ promot$ )\t x4 ,x is ! m>k ( a weak m9d to make an idol ( ord] & me?od2 to cl+ to e/abli%$ =ms ( bus9ess :5 !y clog in/ead ( advanc+ x40 ,balf\r1 ,f\ndations ( ,belief1 #ceg--8,! /ability ( ! heav5s is 9 ! sight ( ,god ( less importance ?an ! moral gr[? ( ! human _s40 ,?is is prov$ by ! ,inc>nation4 ,! ,*ri/ian sees 9 ?is little e>? ! sc5e ( ,god's greate/ revelation4 ,! sup]iority ( ! spiritual to ! physical helps u to see our true dignity 9 ! creation1 to rule our bodies1 to ov]come our s9s4 ,*ri/'s suff]+ %[s u t ,god is no indiff]5t spectator ( human pa94 ,he subjects himself to our conditions1 or r 9 ?is subjection reveals to u ,god's own et]nal suff]+ = s94 ,! atonem5t enables u to solve ! problem ( s94 ,d4 ,! exi/5ce ( moral disord] consequ5t ^u ! free acts ( man's w1 !re=e1 *anges ! presumption aga9/ miracles into a presumption 9 _! favor4 ,! non-appe>ance ( miracles1 9 ?is case1 w\ld be ! greate/ ( wond]s4 ,/e>ns1 ,evid5ce ( ,*ri/ian ,exp]i5ce1 #cca-cce--,s a man's p]sonal consci\sness ( s91 & above all 8 p]sonal exp]i5ce ( reg5]at+ grace1 w con/itute ! be/ prep>ation = ! /udy ( miracles4 8,*ri/ianity _c be prov$ except to a bad consci5ce40 ,! dy+ ,v9et said well3 8,! greate/ miracle t ,i "k ( is t ( my conv]sion4 ,i 0 dead1 & ,i live2 ,i 0 bl9d1 & ,i see2 ,i 0 a slave1 & ,i am free2 ,i 0 an enemy ( ,god1 & ,i love him2 pray]1 ! ,bible1 ! society ( ,*ri/ians1 ^! 7 to me a s\rce ( pr(\nd ennui2 :il/ n[ x is ! pleasures ( ! _w t are we>isome to me1 & piety is ! s\rce ( all my joy4 ,behold ! miracle6 ,& if ,god has be5 able to "w t "o1 !re are none ( :i* he is n capable40 ,yet ! physical & ! moral are n 8sund]$ z ) an axe40 ,nature is b ! l[] /age or imp]fect =m ( ! revelation ( ,god's tru? & hol9ess & love4 ,x prep>es ! way = ! miracle by sugge/+1 ?\gh m dimly1 ! same ess5tial *>act]i/ics ( ! div9e nature4 ,ignorance & s9 necessitate a l>g] disclosure4 ,g4 ,s4 ,lee1 ,! ,%ad[ ,*ri/1 #hd--8,! pill> ( cl\d 0 ! dim night-lamp t ,jehovah kept burn+ ov] 8 infant *ildr51 to %[ !m t he 0 !re4 ,!y did n "k t ! night itself 0 ,god40 ,:y d we h ,*ri/mas pres5ts 9 ,*ri/ian homes8 ,because ! p>5ts d n love _! *ildr5 at o!r times8 ,no2 b because ! m9d becomes sluggi% 9 ! pres5ce ( m]ely regul> k9dness1 & special gifts are ne$$ to wake x to gratitude4 ,s our sluggi% & unlov+ m9ds ne$ special te/imonies ( ! div9e m]cy4 ,%all ,god alone be %ut up to dull uni=mities ( action8 ,%all ! heav5ly ,fa!r alone be unable to make special communications ( love8 ,:y !n are n miracles & revivals ( religion con/ant & uni=m8 ,because uni=m bless+s w\ld be reg>d$ simply z work+s ( a ma*9e4 ,see ,mozley1 ,miracles1 preface1 xxiv2 ,turn]1 ,wi% & ,w1 #bia-cae2 ,n4 ,w4 ,taylor1 ,moral ,gov]nm5t1 #b3chh-dbc4 ,e4 ,z belief 9 ! possibility ( miracles re/s ^u our belief 9 ! exi/5ce ( a p]sonal ,god1 s belief 9 ! probability ( miracles re/s ^u our belief t ,god is a moral & b5evol5t be+4 ,he :o has no ,god b a ,god ( physical ord] w reg>d miracles z an imp]t95t intrusion ^u t ord]4 ,b he :o yields to ! te/imony ( consci5ce & reg>ds ,god z a ,god ( hol9ess1 w see t man's unhol9ess r5d]s ,god's miracul\s int]position mo/ necess>y to man & mo/ becom+ to ,god4 ,our view ( miracles w !re=e be det]m9$ by our belief 9 a moral1 or 9 a non-moral1 ,god4 ,philo1 9 8 ,life ( ,moses1 #a3hh1 speak+ ( ! miracles ( ! quails & ( ! wat] f ! rock1 says t 8all ^! unexpect$ & extraord9>y ?+s are amusem5ts or play?+s ( ,god40 ,he believes t !re is room = arbitr>9ess 9 ! div9e proc$ure4 ,scripture h[ev] repres5ts miracle z an extraord9>y1 r ?an z an arbitr>y1 act4 ,x is 88 "w1 8 /range "w 444 8 act1 8 /range act0 7,is4 #bh3ba74 ,god's ord9>y me?od is t ( regul> gr[? & developm5t4 ,*adwick1 ,unit>ianism1 #gb--8,nature is economical4 ,if %e wants an apple1 %e develops a leaf2 if %e wants a bra91 %e develops a v]tebra4 ,we always ?\ght well ( backbone2 &1 if ,goe!'s 0 a s\nd sugge/ion1 we ?9k bett] ( x n[40 ,x is commonly1 b v errone\sly1 tak5 = grant$ t miracle requires a great] ex]cise ( p[] ?an does ,god's uphold+ ( ! ord9>y processes ( nature4 ,b to an omnipot5t ,be+ our measures ( p[] h no application4 ,! "q is n a "q ( p[]1 b ( rationality & love4 ,miracle implies self-re/ra9t1 z well z self-unfold+1 on ! "p ( him :o works x4 ,x is !re=e n ,god's common me?od ( action2 x is adopt$ only :5 regul> me?ods w n suffice2 x (t5 seems accompani$ by a sacrifice ( feel+ on ! "p ( ,*ri/ ,mat4 #ag3ag--8,o fai?less & p]v]se g5]ation1 h[ long %all ,i be ) y8 h[ long %all ,i be> ) y8 br+ him hi!r to me02 ,m>k #g3cd--8look+ up to heav51 he sigh$1 & sai? unto him1 ,ephpha?a1 t is1 ,be op5$02 cf4 ,mat4 #ab3ci--8;,an evil & adult]\s g5]ation seeke? aft] a sign2 & !re %all no sign be giv5 to x b ! sign ( ,jonah ! prophet40 ,f4 ,f ! po9t ( view ( e?ical monism ! probability ( miracle becomes ev5 great]4 ,s9ce ,god is n m]ely ! intellectual b ! moral ,reason ( ! _w1 ! di/urbances ( ! _w-ord] :i* are due to s9 are ! matt]s :i* mo/ deeply affect him4 ,*ri/1 ! life ( ! :ole sy/em & ( humanity z well1 mu/ suff]2 &1 s9ce we h evid5ce t he is m]ciful z well z j1 x is probable t he w rectify ! evil by extraord9>y means1 :5 m]ely ord9>y means d n avail4 ,l creation & provid5ce1 l inspiration & reg5]ation1 miracle is a "w 9 :i* ,god limits himself1 by a new & peculi> ex]cise ( 8 p[]1--limits himself z "p ( a process ( condesc5d+ love & z a means ( tea*+ s5se-environ$ & s9-burd5$ humanity :at x w\ld n le>n 9 any o!r way4 ,self-limitation1 h[ev]1 is ! v p]fection & glory ( ,god1 = )\t x no self-sacrific+ love w\ld be possible 7see page #i1 ,f474 ,! probability ( miracles is !re=e argu$ n only f ,god's hol9ess b also f 8 love4 ,8 desire to save m5 f _! s9s mu/ be z inf9ite z 8 nature4 ,! inc>nation1 ! atonem5t1 ! resurrection1 :5 once made kn[n to u1 comm5d !mselves1 n only z satisfy+ our human ne$s1 b z wor?y ( a ,god ( moral p]fection4 ,an argum5t = ! probability ( ! miracle might be drawn f ! concessions ( "o ( its *ief mod]n oppon5ts1 ,?omas ,h4 ,huxley4 ,he tells u 9 diff]5t places t ! object ( sci5ce is 8! discov]y ( ! rational ord] t p]vades ! univ]se10 :i* 9 spite ( 8 pr(ess$ agno/icism is an unconsci\s te/imony to ,reason & ,w at ! basis ( all ?+s4 ,he tells u aga9 t !re is no necessity 9 ! uni=mities ( nature3 8,:5 we *ange #8w' into #8mu/1' we introduce an idea ( necessity :i* has no w>rant 9 ! obs]v$ facts1 & has no w>ranty t ,i c discov] else:]e40 ,he speaks ( 8! inf9ite wick$ness t has att5d$ ! c\rse ( human hi/ory40 ,yet he has no hope 9 man's p[] to save himself3 8,i w\ld z soon adore a wild]ness ( apes10 z ! ,pan!i/'s rationaliz$ conception ( humanity4 ,he grants t ,jesus ,*ri/ is 8! noble/ ideal ( humanity :i* mank9d has yet wor%ip$40 ,:y %\ld he n g fur!r & conc$e t ,jesus ,*ri/ mo/ truly repres5ts ! inf9ite ,reason at ! he>t ( ?+s1 & t 8 purity & love1 demon/rat$ by suff]+ & dea?1 make x probable t ,god w use extraord9>y means = man's deliv]ance8 ,x is d\btful :e!r ,huxley recogniz$ 8 own p]sonal s9fulness z fully z he recogniz$ ! s9fulness ( humanity 9 g5]al4 ,if he _h done s1 he w\ld h be5 will+ to accept miracle ^u ev5 a slight prepond]ance ( hi/orical pro(4 ,z a matt] ( fact1 he reject$ miracle ^u ! gr\nds assign$ by ,hume1 :i* we n[ proce$ to m5tion4 #d4 ,am\nt ( ,te/imony necess>y to prove a ,miracle4 ,! am\nt ( te/imony necess>y to prove a miracle is no great] ?an t :i* is requisite to prove ! occurr5ce ( any o!r unusual b confess$ly possible ev5t4 ,hume1 inde$1 argu$ t a miracle is s contradictory ( all human exp]i5ce t x is m reasonable to believe any am\nt ( te/imony false ?an to believe a miracle to be true4 ,! orig9al =m ( ! argum5t c be f\nd 9 ,hume's ,philosophical ,works1 #d3abd-aej4 ,see also ,bib4 ,sac41 ,oct4 #ahfg3fae4 ,= ! mo/ rec5t & plausible /atem5t ( x1 see ,sup]natural ,religion1 #a3ee-id4 ,! argum5t ma9ta9s = sub/ance t ?+s are impossible because improbable4 ,x ridicules ! cr$ulity ( ^? :o 8?ru/ _! fi/s aga9/ ! po/s1 ,& /ill insi/ !y see ! gho/s10 & holds ) ! ,g]man philosoph] :o decl>$ t he w\ld n believe 9 a miracle1 ev5 if he saw "o ) 8 own eyes4 ,*ri/ianity is s miracul\s t x takes a miracle to make "o believe x4 ,! argum5t is fallaci\s1 because 7a7 ,x is *>geable ) a petitio pr9cipii1 9 mak+ our own p]sonal exp]i5ce ! measure ( all human exp]i5ce4 ,! same pr9ciple w\ld make ! pro( ( any absolutely new fact impossible4 ,ev5 ?\gh ,god %\ld "w a miracle1 he c\ld nev] prove x4 7b7 ,x involves a self-contradiction1 s9ce x seeks to ov]?r[ our fai? 9 human te/imony by adduc+ to ! contr>y ! g5]al exp]i5ce ( m51 ( :i* we "k only f te/imony4 ,?is g5]al exp]i5ce1 moreov]1 is m]ely negative1 & _c neutralize t :i* is positive1 except ^u pr9ciples :i* w\ld invalidate all te/imony :atev]4 7c7 ,x requires belief 9 a great] wond] ?an ^? :i* x w\ld escape4 ,t multitudes ( intellig5t & hone/ m5 %\ld aga9/ all _! int]e/s unite 9 delib]ate & p]si/5t falsehood1 "u ! circum/ances n>rat$ 9 ! ,new ,te/am5t record1 involves a *ange 9 ! sequ5ces ( nature f> m incr$ible ?an ! miracles ( ,*ri/ & 8 apo/les4 7a7 ,john ,/u>t ,mill1 ,essays on ,!ism1 #baf-bda1 grants t1 ev5 if a miracle 7 wr\ght1 x w\ld be impossible to prove x4 ,9 ?is he only e*oes ,hume1 ,miracles1 #aab--8,! ultimate /&>d by :i* we det]m9e all disputes t may arise is always d]iv$ f exp]i5ce & obs]vation40 ,b "h our own p]sonal exp]i5ce is made ! /&>d by :i* to judge all human exp]i5ce4 ,:ately1 ,hi/oric ,d\bts relative to ,napoleon ,buonap>te1 %[s t ! same rule w\ld require u to d5y ! exi/5ce ( ! great ,fr5*man1 s9ce ,napoleon's conque/s 7 contr>y to all exp]i5ce1 & civiliz$ nations _h nev] be=e be5 s subdu$4 ,! ,london ,times = ,june #ah1 #ahhh1 = ! fir/ "t 9 at lea/ a hundr$ ye>s or 9 #ca1bjj issues1 0 misdat$1 & c]ta9 pages read ,june #ag1 al?\gh ,june #ag 0 ,sunday4 ,yet ! pap] w\ld h be5 admitt$ 9 a c\rt ( ju/ice z evid5ce ( a m>riage4 ,! real wond] is1 n ! break 9 exp]i5ce1 b ! cont9uity )\t ! break4 7b7 ,lyman ,abbott3 8,if ! ,old ,te/am5t told ! /ory ( a naval engagem5t betwe5 ! ,jewi% p & a pagan p1 9 :i* all ! %ips ( ! pagan p 7 absolutely de/roy$ & n a s+le man 0 kill$ among ! ,jews1 all ! sceptics w\ld h scorn$ ! n>rative4 ,e "o n[ believes x1 except ^? :o live 9 ,spa940 ,!re are p :o 9 a simil> way refuse to inve/igate ! ph5om5a ( hypnotism1 second sight1 clairvoyance1 & telepa?y1 decl>+ a priori t all ^! ?+s are impossible4 ,prophecy1 9 ! s5se ( pr$iction1 is discr$it$4 ,^u ! same pr9ciple wireless telegraphy might be d5\nc$ z an impo/ure4 ,! son ( ,er9 *>g$ ) murd] def5d$ himself by say+3 8,y\r honor1 ,i c br+ fifty p :o did n see me d x40 ,our fai? 9 te/imony _c be due to exp]i5ce4 7c7 ,on ?is po9t1 see ,*alm]s1 ,*ri/ian ,revelation1 #c3gj2 ,/>kie on ,evid5ce1 #gci2 ,de ,qu9cey1 ,!ological ,essays1 #a3afb-ahh2 ,?ornton1 ,old-fa%ion$ ,e?ics1 #adc-aec2 ,campbell on ,miracles4 ,s\?'s s]mon on ,! ,c]ta9ty ( our ,savior's ,resurrection _h /at$ & answ]$ ?is objection long be=e ,hume prop\nd$ x4 #e4 ,evid5tial =ce ( ,miracles4 7a7 ,miracles are ! natural accompanim5ts & atte/ations ( new communications f ,god4 ,! great epo*s ( miracles--repres5t$ by ,moses1 ! prophets1 ! fir/ & second com+s ( ,*ri/--are co9cid5t ) ! great epo*s ( revelation4 ,miracles s]ve to draw att5tion to new tru?1 & cease :5 ?is tru? has ga9$ curr5cy & foo?old4 ,miracles are n scatt]$ ev5ly ov] ! :ole c\rse ( hi/ory4 ,few miracles are record$ dur+ ! #bejj ye>s f ,adam to ,moses4 ,:5 ! ,n4 ,t4 ,canon is complet$ & ! int]nal evid5ce ( ,scripture has atta9$ its greate/ /r5g?1 ! ext]nal atte/ations by miracle are ei!r :olly )drawn or beg9 to disappe>4 ,! spiritual wond]s ( reg5]ation rema91 & = ^! ! way has be5 prep>$ by ! long progress f ! miracles ( p[] wr\ght by ,moses to ! miracles ( grace wr\ght by ,*ri/4 ,miracles disappe>$ because new] & high] pro(s r5d]$ !m unnecess>y4 ,bett] ?+s ?an ^! are n[ 9 evid5ce4 ,?omas ,full]3 8,miracles are ! swaddl+-clo!s ( ! infant *ur*40 ,john ,fo/]3 8,miracles are ! great bell ( ! univ]se1 :i* draws m5 to ,god's s]mon40 ,h5ry ,w>d ,bee*]3 8,miracles are ! midwives ( great moral tru?s2 c&les lit be=e ! dawn b put out aft] ! sun has ris540 ,ill+wor?1 9 ,lux ,mundi1 #baj--8,:5 we are told t miracles contradict exp]i5ce1 we po9t to ! daily occurr5ce ( ! spiritual miracle ( reg5]ation & ask3 #8,:i* is easi] to say1 ,?y s9s are =giv52 or to say1 ,arise & walk8' 7,mat4 #i3e740 ,miracles & inspiration g toge!r2 if ! =m] rema9 9 ! *ur*1 ! latt] %\ld rema9 also2 see ,m>%1 9 ,bap4 ,qu>4 ,rev41 #ahhg3bbe-bdb4 ,on ! cessation ( miracles 9 ! e>ly *ur*1 see ,h5d]son1 ,inspiration1 #ddc-dij2 ,bckmann1 9 ,zeits*4 f4 lu?4 ,!ol4 u4 ,kir*e1 #ahgh3baf4 ,on miracles 9 ! second c5tury1 see ,b>n>d1 ,lit]ature ( ! ,second ,c5tury1 #aci-ahj4 ,a4 ,j4 ,gordon1 ,m9i/ry ( ! ,_s1 #afg--8,! apo/les 7 commission$ to speak = ,*ri/ till ! ,n4 ,t4 ,scriptures1 8 au?oritative voice1 7 complet$4 ,9 ! apo/olate we h a provisional inspiration2 9 ! ,n4 ,t4 a /]eotyp$ inspiration2 ! fir/ be+ end[$ ) au?ority ad int]im to =give s9s1 & ! second hav+ ?is au?ority 9 p]petuo40 ,dr4 ,gordon draws an analogy betwe5 coal1 :i* is fossil sunlight1 & ! ,new ,te/am5t1 :i* is fossil inspiration4 ,sabati]1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #gd--8,! ,bible is v free f ! s5seless prodigies ( ori5tal my?ology4 ,! great prophets1 ,isaiah1 ,amos1 ,micah1 ,j]emiah1 ,john ! ,bapti/1 "w no miracles4 ,jesus' temptation 9 ! wild]ness is a victory ( ! moral consci\sness ov] ! religion ( m]e physical prodigy40 ,tr5* says t miracles clu/] ab\t ! f\ndation ( ! !ocratic k+dom "u ,moses & ,jo%ua1 & ab\t ! re/oration ( t k+dom "u ,elijah & ,eli%a4 ,9 ! ,o4 ,t41 miracles confute ! gods ( ,egypt "u ,moses1 ! ,phnician ,baal "u ,elijah & ,eli%a1 & ! gods ( ,babylon "u ,daniel4 ,see ,diman1 ,!i/ic ,argum5t1 #cgf1 & art43 ,miracle1 by ,b]n>d1 9 ,ha/+s' ,bible ,diction>y4 7b7 ,miracles g5]ally c]tify to ! tru? ( doctr9e1 n directly1 b indirectly2 o!rwise a new miracle mu/ ne$s accompany ea* new doctr9e taught4 ,miracles prim>ily & directly c]tify to ! div9e commission & au?ority ( a religi\s tea*]1 & !re=e w>rant acceptance ( 8 doctr9es & ob$i5ce to 8 comm&s z ! doctr9es & comm&s ( ,god1 :e!r ^! be communicat$ at int]vals or all toge!r1 orally or 9 writt5 docum5ts4 ,! exceptions to ! above /atem5t are v few1 & are f\nd only 9 cases :]e ! :ole commission & au?ority ( ,*ri/1 & n "s fragm5t>y doctr9e1 are involv$4 ,jesus appeals to 8 miracles z pro( ( ! tru? ( 8 tea*+ 9 ,mat4 #i3e1 #f--8,:i* is easi] to say1 ,?y s9s are =giv52 or to say1 ,arise & walk8 ,b t ye may "k t ! ,son ( man ha? au?ority on e>? to =give s9s 7!n sai? he to ! sick ( ! palsy71 ,arise1 & take up ?y b$1 & g unto ?y h\se02 #ab3bh--8;if ,i by ! _s ( ,god ca/ out demons1 !n is ! k+dom ( ,god come ^u y40 ,s ,paul 9 ,rom4 #a3d1 says t ,jesus 80 decl>$ to be ! ,son ( ,god ) p[]1 444 by ! resurrection f ! dead40 ,mair1 ,*ri/ian ,evid5ces1 #bbc1 quotes f ,natural ,religion1 #aha--8;,x is said t ! !o-philan?ropi/ ,l>vellire-,lpeaux once confid$ to ,talleyr& 8 disappo9tm5t at ! ill success ( 8 attempt to br+ into vogue a sort ( improv$ ,*ri/ianity1 a sort ( b5evol5t rationalism :i* he _h inv5t$ to meet ! wants ( a b5evol5t age4 #8,8 propag&a made no way1' he said4 #8,:at 0 he to d8' he ask$4 ,! ex-bi%op ,talleyr& politely condol$ ) him1 fe>$ x 0 a difficult task to f\nd a new religion1 m difficult ?an he _h imag9$1 s difficult t he h>dly knew :at to advise4 #8,/ill1'--s he w5t on aft] a mom5t's reflection1--#8!re is "o plan :i* y might at lea/ try3 ,i %\ld recomm5d y to be crucifi$1 & to rise aga9 ! ?ird day4' 0 ,see also ,murphy1 ,sci5tific ,bases ( ,fai?1 #adg-afg2 ,f>r>1 ,life ( ,*ri/1 #a3afh-agb4 7c7 ,miracles1 !re=e1 d n /& alone z evid5ces4 ,p[] alone _c prove a div9e commission4 ,purity ( life & doctr9e mu/ g ) ! miracles to assure u t a religi\s tea*] has come f ,god4 ,! miracles & ! doctr9e 9 ?is mann] mutually support ea* o!r1 & =m p>ts ( "o :ole4 ,! int]nal evid5ce = ! ,*ri/ian sy/em may h great] p[] ov] c]ta9 m9ds & ov] c]ta9 ages ?an ! ext]nal evid5ce4 ,pascal's aphorism t 8doctr9es mu/ be judg$ by miracles1 miracles by doctr9e10 ne$s to be supplem5t$ by ,mozley's /atem5t t 8a sup]natural fact is ! prop] pro( ( a sup]natural doctr9e1 :ile a sup]natural doctr9e is n ! prop] pro( ( a sup]natural fact40 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #ajg1 w\ld 8def5d miracles1 b w\ld n buttress up ,*ri/ianity by !m4444 ,no am\nt ( miracles c\ld conv9ce a good man ( ! div9e commission ( a kn[n bad man2 nor1 on ! o!r h&1 c\ld any degree ( miracul\s p[] suffice to sil5ce ! d\bts ( an evil-m9d$ man4444 ,! miracle is a c]tification only to him :o c p]ceive its significance4444 ,! ,*ri/ian *ur* has ! resurrection writt5 all ov] x4 ,its v exi/5ce is pro( ( ! resurrection4 ,twelve m5 c\ld nev] h f\nd$ ! *ur*1 if ,*ri/ _h rema9$ 9 ! tomb4 ,! liv+ *ur* is ! burn+ bu% t is n consum$40 ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #eg--8;,jesus did n appe> aft] 8 resurrection to unbeliev]s1 b to believ]s only1--:i* means t ?is cr[n+ miracle 0 meant to confirm an exi/+ fai?1 n to create "o :]e x did n exi/40 ,*ri/ian ,union1 ,july #aa1 #ahia--8;,if ! anticipat$ resurrection ( ,joseph ,smi? 7 to take place1 x w\ld add no?+ :atev] to ! au?ority ( ! ,mormon religion40 ,s*urman1 ,agno/icism & ,religion1 #eg--8,miracles are m]ely ! bells to call primitive peoples to *ur*4 ,sweet z ! music !y once made1 mod]n e>s f9d !m jangl+ & out ( tune1 & _! dissonant notes sc>e away pi\s s\ls :o w\ld fa9 ent] ! temple ( wor%ip40 ,a new def9ition ( miracle :i* recognizes _! possible classification z extraord9>y occurr5ces 9 nature1 yet sees 9 all nature ! work+ ( ! liv+ ,god1 may d mu* to remove ?is prejudice4 ,bi%op ( ,s\?ampton1 ,place ( ,miracle1 #ec--8,miracles alone c\ld n produce conviction4 ,! ,ph>isees ascrib$ !m to ,beelzebub4 ,?\gh ,jesus _h done s _m signs1 yet !y believ$ n4444 ,?\gh miracles 7 frequ5tly wr\ght1 !y 7 r>ely appeal$ to z evid5ce ( ! tru? ( ! gospel4 ,!y are simply signs ( ,god's pres5ce 9 8 _w4 ,by itself a miracle _h no evid5tial =ce4 ,! only te/ = di/+ui%+ div9e f ,satanic miracles is t ( ! moral "* & purpose ( ! work]2 & !re=e miracles dep5d = all _! =ce ^u a previ\s appreciation ( ! "* & p]sonality ( ,*ri/ 7#gi74 ,! e>lie/ apologi/s make no use ( miracles4 ,!y are ( no value except 9 connection ) prophecy4 ,miracles are ! revelation ( ,god1 n ! pro( ( revelation40 ,v]sus ,sup]natural ,religion1 #a3bc1 & ,/e>ns1 9 ,new ,engl&]1 ,jan4 #ahhb3hj4 ,see ,mozley1 ,miracles1 #ae2 ,nicoll1 ,life ( ,jesus ,*ri/1 #acc2 ,mill1 ,logic1 #cgd-chb2 ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 ,int4 to ,*ri/4 ,!ology1 #afg-afi2 ,fi%]1 9 ,j\rn4 ,*ri/4 ,philos41 ,april1 #ahhc3bgj-bhc4 7d7 ,yet ! ,*ri/ian miracles d n lose _! value z evid5ce 9 ! process ( ages4 ,! l(ti] ! /ructure ( ,*ri/ian life & doctr9e ! great] ne$ t its f\ndation be secure4 ,! au?ority ( ,*ri/ z a tea*] ( sup]natural tru? re/s ^u 8 miracles1 & especially ^u ! miracle ( 8 resurrection4 ,t "o miracle to :i* ! *ur* looks back z ! s\rce ( h] life c>ries ) x irresi/ibly all ! o!r miracles ( ! ,scripture record2 ^u x alone we may safely re/ ! pro( t ! ,scriptures are an au?oritative revelation f ,god4 ,! miracles ( ,*ri/ are simple correlates ( ! ,inc>nation--prop] insignia ( 8 royalty & div9ity4 ,by m]e ext]nal evid5ce h[ev] we c m easily prove ! resurrection ?an ! inc>nation4 ,9 our argum5ts ) sceptics1 we %\ld n beg9 ) ! ass t spoke to ,balaam1 or ! fi% t swall[$ ,jonah1 b ) ! resurrection ( ,*ri/2 t conc$$1 all o!r ,biblical miracles w seem only natural prep>ations1 accompanim5ts1 or consequ5ces4 ,g4 ,f4 ,wright1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahhi3gjg--8,! difficulties creat$ by ! miracul\s "* ( ,*ri/ianity may be comp>$ to ^? assum$ by a build] :5 great p]man5ce is desir$ 9 ! /ructure erect$4 ,x is easi] to lay ! f\ndation ( a tempor>y /ructure ?an ( "o :i* is to endure = ! ages40 ,press5s3 8,! empty tomb ( ,*ri/ has be5 ! cradle ( ! *ur*1 & if 9 ?is f\ndation ( h] fai? ! *ur* has be5 mi/ak51 %e mu/ ne$s lay h]self d[n by ! side ( ! mortal rema9s1 ,i say1 n ( a man1 b ( a religion40 ,presid5t ,s*urman believes ! resurrection ( ,*ri/ to be 8an obsolete picture ( an et]nal tru?--! fact ( a cont9u$ life ) ,god40 ,h>nack1 ,wes5 des ,*ri/5?ums1 #ajb1 ?9ks no consi/5t union ( ! gospel acc\nts ( ,*ri/'s resurrection c be atta9$2 app>5tly d\bts a lit]al & bodily ris+2 yet traces ,*ri/ianity back to an inv9cible fai? 9 ,*ri/'s conqu]+ ( dea? & 8 cont9u$ life4 ,b :y believe ! gospels :5 !y speak ( ! sympa?y ( ,*ri/1 yet disbelieve !m :5 !y speak ( 8 miracul\s p[]8 ,we h no "r to tru/ ! n>rative :5 x gives u ,*ri/'s words 8,weep n0 to ! wid[ ( ,na91 7,luke #g3ac71 & !n to di/ru/ x :5 x tells u ( 8 rais+ ! wid['s son4 ,! words 8,jesus wept0 belong insep>ably to a /ory ( :i* 8,laz>us1 come =?60 =ms a "p 7,john #aa3ce1 #dc74 ,x is improbable t ! disciples %\ld h believ$ s /up5d\s a miracle z ,*ri/'s resurrection1 if !y _h n previ\sly se5 o!r manife/ations ( miracul\s p[] on ! "p ( ,*ri/4 ,*ri/ himself is ! great miracle4 ,! conception ( him z ! ris5 & glorifi$ ,savior c be expla9$ only by ! fact t he did s rise4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,*ri/4 ,!ology1 #aji--8,! ,*ur* atte/s ! fact ( ! resurrection q z mu* z ! resurrection atte/s ! div9e orig9 ( ! *ur*4 ,resurrection1 z an evid5ce1 dep5ds on ! exi/5ce ( ! *ur* :i* proclaims x40 7e7 ,! resurrection ( our ,"l ,jesus ,*ri/--by :i* we mean 8 com+ =? f ! sepul*re 9 body z well z 9 _s--is demon/rat$ by evid5ce z v>i$ & z conclusive z t :i* proves to u any s+le fact ( anci5t hi/ory4 ,)\t x ,*ri/ianity itself is inexplicable1 z is %[n by ! failure ( all mod]n rationali/ic !ories to acc\nt = its rise & progress4 ,9 discuss+ ! evid5ce ( ,jesus' resurrection1 we are confront$ ) ?ree ma9 rationali/ic !ories3 ,i4 ,! ,swoon-!ory ( ,/rauss4 ,?is holds t ,jesus did n really die4 ,! cold & ! spices ( ! sepul*re reviv$ him4 ,we reply t ! blood & wat]1 & ! te/imony ( ! c5turion 7,m>k #ae3de71 prov$ actual dea? 7see ,bib4 ,sac41 ,april1 #ahhi3bbh2 ,=re/1 ,*ri/ ( ,hi/ory & ,exp]i5ce1 #acg-agj74 ,! roll+ away ( ! /one1 & ,jesus' p[] imm$iately aft]1 are inconsi/5t ) imm$iately prec$+ swoon & susp5d$ animation4 ,h[ 0 8 life pres]v$8 :]e did he g8 :5 did he die8 ,8 n dy+ implies deceit on 8 own "p or on t ( 8 disciples4 ,,ii4 ,! ,_s-!ory ( ,keim4 ,jesus really di$1 b only 8 _s appe>$4 ,! _s ( ,jesus gave ! disciples a sign ( 8 cont9u$ life1 a telegram f heav54 ,b we reply t ! telegram 0 untrue1 = x ass]t$ t 8 body _h ris5 f ! tomb4 ,! tomb 0 empty & ! l95 clo?s %[$ an ord]ly dep>ture4 ,jesus himself d5i$ t he 0 a bodiless _s3 8a _s ha? n fle% & bones1 z ye see me hav+0 7,luke #bd3ci74 ,did 88 fle% see corruption0 7,acts #b3ca78 ,0 ! p5it5t ?ief rais$ f ! dead z mu* z he8 ,godet1 ,lectures 9 ,def5ce ( ! ,*ri/ian ,fai?1 lect4 i3 ,a dilemma = ^? :o d5y ! fact ( ,*ri/'s resurrection3 ,ei!r 8 body rema9$ 9 ! h&s ( 8 disciples1 or x 0 giv5 up to ! ,jews4 ,if ! disciples reta9$ x1 !y 7 impo/ors3 b ?is is n ma9ta9$ by mod]n rationali/s4 ,if ! ,jews reta9$ x1 :y did !y n produce x z conclusive evid5ce aga9/ ! disciples8 ,,iii4 ,! ,vision-!ory ( ,r5an4 ,jesus di$1 & !re 0 no objective appe>ance ev5 ( 8 _s4 ,m>y ,magdal5e 0 ! victim ( subjective halluc9ation1 & h] halluc9ation became contagi\s4 ,?is 0 natural because ! ,jews expect$ t ! ,messiah w\ld "w miracles & w\ld rise f ! dead4 ,we reply t ! disciples did n expect ,jesus' resurrection4 ,! wom5 w5t to ! sepul*re1 n to see a ris5 ,r$eem]1 b to embalm a dead body4 ,?omas & ^? at ,emmaus _h giv5 up all hope4 ,f\r hundr$ ye>s _h pass$ s9ce ! days ( miracles2 ,john ! ,bapti/ 8did no miracle0 7,john #aj3da72 ! ,sadducees said 8!re is no resurrection0 7,mat4 #bb3bc74 ,!re 7 ?irte5 diff]5t appe>ances1 to3 #a4 ! ,magdal52 #b4 o!r wom52 #c4 ,pet]2 #d4 ,emmaus2 #e4 ! ,twelve2 #f4 ! ,twelve aft] eight days2 #g4 ,galilee sea%ore2 #h4 ,galilee m\nta92 #i4 ,galilee five hundr$2 #aj4 ,james2 #aa4 asc5sion at ,be?any2 #ab4 ,/eph52 #ac4 ,paul on way to ,damascus4 ,paul describes ,*ri/'s appe>ance to him z some?+ objective1 & he implies t ,*ri/'s previ\s appe>ances to o!rs 7 objective also3 8la/ ( all ^! bodily appe>ances1 444 he appe>$ to me also0 7#a ,cor4 #ae3h74 ,bruce1 ,apologetics1 #cif--8,paul's int]e/ & int5tion 9 class+ ! two toge!r 0 to level 8 own vision ( ,*ri/ up to ! objectivity ( ! e>ly ,*ri/ophanies4 ,he believ$ t ! elev51 t ,pet] 9 p>ticul>1 _h se5 ! ris5 ,*ri/ ) ! eye ( ! body1 & he meant to claim = himself a vision ( ! same k9d40 ,paul's 0 a sane1 /rong nature4 ,subjective visions d n trans=m human lives2 ! resurrection m\ld$ ! apo/les2 !y did n create ! resurrection 7see ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #gf74 ,^! appe>ances soon ceas$1 unlike ! law ( halluc9ations1 :i* increase 9 frequ5cy & int5sity4 ,x is impossible to expla9 ! ord9ances1 ! ,"l's day1 or ,*ri/ianity itself1 if ,jesus did n rise f ! dead4 ,! resurrection ( our ,"l tea*es ?ree important lessons3 7#a7 ,x %[$ t 8 "w ( atonem5t 0 complet$ & 0 /amp$ ) ! div9e approval2 7#b7 ,x %[$ him to be ,"l ( all & gave ! "o suffici5t ext]nal pro( ( ,*ri/ianity2 7#c7 ,x furni%$ ! gr\nd & pl$ge ( our own resurrection1 & ?us 8br\ght life & immortality to light0 7#b ,tim4 #a3aj74 ,x mu/ be rememb]$ t ! resurrection 0 ! "o sign ^u :i* ,jesus himself /ak$ 8 claims--8! sign ( ,jonah0 7,luke #aa3bi72 & t ! resurrection is pro(1 n simply ( ,god's p[]1 b ( ,*ri/'s own p[]3 ,john #aj3ah--8;,i h p[] to lay x d[n1 & ,i h p[] to take x aga902 #b3ai--8;,de/roy ?is temple1 & 9 ?ree days ,i w raise x up04444 #ba--8;he spake ( ! temple ( 8 body40 ,see ,alex&]1 ,*ri/ & ,*ri/ianity1 #i1 #aeh-bbd1 #cjb2 ,mill1 ,!ism1 #baf2 ,aub]l51 ,div4 ,revelation1 #ef2 ,bo/on ,lectures1 #bjc-bci2 ,*ri/lieb1 ,mod]n ,d\bt & ,*ri/ian ,belief1 #ddh-ejc2 ,r[1 ,bampton ,lectures1 #ahhg3ceh-dbc2 ,hutton1 ,essays1 #a3aai2 ,s*aff1 9 ,pr9ceton ,rev41 ,may1 #ahhj2 #daa-dai2 ,fi%]1 ,*ri/ian ,evid5ces1 #da-df1 #hb-he2 ,we/1 9 ,def5ce & ,conf4 ( ,fai?1 #hj-abi2 also special works on ! ,resurrection ( our ,"l1 by ,milligan1 ,morrison1 ,k5n$y1 ,j4 ,baldw9 ,br[n4 #f4 ,c\nt]feit ,miracles4 ,s9ce only an act directly wr\ght by ,god c prop]ly be call$ a miracle1 x foll[s t surpris+ ev5ts br\ght ab\t by evil spirits or by m51 ?r\gh ! use ( natural ag5cies beyond our k1 are n entitl$ to ?is appellation4 ,! ,scriptures recognize ! exi/5ce ( su*1 b d5om9ate !m 8ly+ wond]s0 7#b ,!ss4 #b3i74 ,^! c\nt]feit miracles 9 v>i\s ages argue t ! belief 9 miracles is natural to ! race1 & t some:]e !re mu/ exi/ ! true4 ,!y s]ve to %[ t n all sup]natural occurr5ces are div9e1 & to impress ^u u ! necessity ( c>eful exam9ation be=e we accept !m z div9e4 ,false miracles may commonly be di/+ui%$ f ! true by 7a7 _! accompanim5ts ( immoral conduct or ( doctr9e contradictory to tru? already reveal$--z 9 mod]n spiritualism2 7b7 _! int]nal *>act]i/ics ( inanity & extravagance--z 9 ! liquefaction ( ! blood ( ,/4 ,janu>ius1 or ! miracles ( ! ,apocryphal ,new ,te/am5t2 7c7 ! insuffici5cy ( ! object :i* !y are design$ to fur!r--z 9 ! case ( ,apollonius ( ,tyana1 or ( ! miracles said to accompany ! publication ( ! doctr9es ( ! immaculate conception & ( ! papal infallibility2 7d7 _! lack ( sub/antiat+ evid5ce--z 9 m$ival miracles1 s seldom atte/$ by contempor>y & dis9t]e/$ witnesses2 7e7 _! d5ial or und]valu+ ( ,god's previ\s revelation ( himself 9 nature--z %[n by ! neglect ( ord9>y means1 9 ! cases ( ,fai?-cure & ( s-call$ ,*ri/ian ,sci5ce4 ,only :at is valuable is c\nt]feit$4 ,false miracles presuppose ! true4 ,fi%]1 ,nature & ,me?od ( ,revelation1 #bhc--8,! miracles ( ,jesus orig9at$ fai? 9 him1 :ile m$ival miracles foll[ e/abli%$ fai?4 ,! te/imony ( ! apo/les 0 giv5 9 ! face ( incr$ul\s ,sadducees4 ,!y 7 ridicul$ & maltreat$ on acc\nt ( x4 ,x 0 no "t = dev\t dreams & ! inv5tion ( romances40 ,! blood ( ,/4 ,janu>ius at ,naples is said to be conta9$ 9 a vial1 "o side ( :i* is ( ?ick glass1 :ile ! o!r side is ( ?94 ,a simil> miracle 0 wr\ght at ,hales 9 ,gl\ce/]%ire4 ,/4 ,alban1 ! fir/ m>tyr ( ,brita91 aft] 8 head is cut (f1 c>ries x ab\t 9 8 h&4 ,9 ,irel& ! place is %[n :]e ,/4 ,patrick 9 ! fif? c5tury drove all ! toads & snakes ov] a precipice into ! ne!r regions4 ,! leg5d h[ev] did n become curr5t until "s hundr$s ( ye>s aft] ! sa9t's bones _h crumbl$ to du/ at ,saul1 ne> ,d[npatrick 7see ,hemphill1 ,lit]ature ( ! ,second ,c5tury1 #ahj-ahb74 ,comp>e ! /ory ( ! book ( ,tobit 7#f-h71 :i* relates ! expulsion ( a demon by smoke f ! burn+ he>t & liv] ( a fi% caught 9 ! ,tigris1 & ! /ory ( ! ,apocryphal ,new ,te/am5t 7,i1 ,infancy71 :i* tells ( ! expulsion ( ,satan 9 ! =m ( a mad dog f ,judas by ! *ild ,jesus4 ,on c\nt]feit miracles 9 g5]al1 see ,mozley1 ,miracles1 #ae1 #afa2 ,f4 ,w4 ,f>r>1 ,witness ( ,hi/ory to ,*ri/1 #gb2 ,a4 ,s4 ,f>r>1 ,sci5ce & ,!ology1 #bjh2 ,?oluck1 ,v]mis*te ,s*rift51 #a3bg2 ,hodge1 ,sy/4 ,!ol41 #a3fcj2 ,presb4 ,rev41 #ahha3fhg-gai4 ,"s mod]n writ]s h ma9ta9$ t ! gift ( miracles /ill rema9s 9 ! *ur*4 ,b5gel3 8,! reason :y _m miracles are n n[ wr\ght is n s mu* because fai? is e/abli%$1 z because unbelief reigns40 ,*ri/lieb3 8,x is ! want ( fai? 9 our age :i* is ! greate/ h9drance to ! /rong] & m m>k$ appe>ance ( t miracul\s p[] :i* is work+ "h & !re 9 quiet concealm5t4 ,unbelief is ! f9al & mo/ important reason = ! retrogression ( miracles40 ,edw>d ,irv+1 ,works1 #e3dfd--8,sickness is s9 app>5t 9 ! body1 ! pres5tim5t ( dea?1 ! =]unn] ( corruption4 ,n[1 z ,*ri/ came to de/roy dea?1 & w yet r$eem ! body f ! bondage ( corruption1 if ! *ur* is to h a fir/ fruits or e>ne/ ( ?is p[]1 x mu/ be by receiv+ p[] ov] diseases t are ! fir/ fruits & e>ne/ ( dea?40 ,dr4 ,a4 ,j4 ,gordon1 9 8 ,m9i/ry ( ,heal+1 held to ?is view4 ,see also ,boys1 ,pro(s ( ! ,miracul\s 9 ! ,exp]i5ce ( ! ,*ur*2 ,bu%nell1 ,nature & ! ,sup]natural1 #ddf-dib2 ,review ( ,gordon1 by ,v9c5t1 9 ,presb4 ,rev41 #ahhc3dgc-ejb2 ,review ( ,v9c5t1 9 ,presb4 ,rev41 #ahhd3di-gi4 ,9 reply to ! advocates ( fai?-cure 9 g5]al1 we w\ld grant t nature is pla/ic 9 ,god's h&2 t he c "w miracle :5 & :]e x pleases him2 & t he has giv5 promises :i*1 ) c]ta9 ,scriptural & rational limitations1 enc\rage believ+ pray] = heal+ 9 cases ( sickness4 ,b we incl9e to ! belief t 9 ^! lat] ages ,god answ]s su* pray]1 n by miracle1 b by special provid5ce1 & by gifts ( c\rage1 fai? & w1 ?us act+ by 8 ,_s directly ^u ! s\l & only indirectly ^u ! body4 ,! laws ( nature are g5]ic volitions ( ,god1 & to ignore !m & disuse means is presumption & disrespect to ,god himself4 ,! ,scripture promise to fai? is always expressly or impli$ly condition$ ^u our use ( means3 we are to "w out our own salvation1 = ! v reason t x is ,god :o works 9 u2 x is va9 = ! dr[n+ man to pray1 s long z he refuses to lay hold ( ! rope t is ?r[n to him4 ,m$ic9es & physicians are ! rope ?r[n to u by ,god2 we _c expect miracul\s help1 :ile we neglect ! help ,god has already giv5 u2 to refuse ?is help is practically to d5y ,*ri/'s revelation 9 nature4 ,:y n live )\t eat+1 z well z recov] f sickness )\t m$ic9e8 ,fai?-fe$+ is q z rational z fai?-heal+4 ,to except cases ( disease f ?is g5]al rule z to ! use ( means has no w>rant ei!r 9 reason or 9 ,scripture4 ,! atonem5t has pur*as$ complete salvation1 & "s day salvation %all be ours4 ,b dea? & depravity /ill rema91 n z p5alty1 b z *a/isem5t4 ,s disease rema9s also4 ,hospitals = ,incurables1 & ! dea?s ev5 ( advocates ( fai?-cure1 %[ t !y too are compell$ to recognize "s limit to ! application ( ! ,new ,te/am5t promise4 ,9 view ( ! prec$+ discussion we mu/ reg>d ! s-call$ ,*ri/ian ,sci5ce z nei!r ,*ri/ian nor sci5tific4 ,mrs4 ,m>y ,bak] ,g4 ,eddy d5ies ! au?ority ( all t "p ( revelation :i* ,god has made to man 9 nature1 & holds t ! laws ( nature may be disreg>d$ ) impunity by ^? :o h prop] fai?2 see ,g4 ,f4 ,wright1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,april1 #ahii3cge4 ,bi%op ,lawr5ce ( ,massa*usetts3 8,"o ( ! errors ( ,*ri/ian ,sci5ce is its neglect ( accumulat$ k1 ( ! fund ( in=mation /or$ up = ^! ,*ri/ian c5turies4 ,t k is j z mu* ,god's gift z is ! k obta9$ f direct revelation4 ,9 reject+ accumulat$ k & pr(essional skill1 ,*ri/ian ,sci5ce rejects ! gift ( ,god40 ,mo/ ( ! pr(ess$ cures ( ,*ri/ian ,sci5ce are explicable by ! influ5ce ( ! m9d ^u ! body1 ?r\gh hypnosis or sugge/ion2 7see ,a4 ,a4 ,b5nett1 9 ,wat*man1 ,feb4 #ac1 #aijc74 ,m5tal di/urbance may make ! "m's milk a poison to ! *ild2 m5tal excitem5t is a common cause ( indige/ion2 m5tal depression induces b[el disord]s2 depress$ m5tal & moral conditions r5d] a p]son m susceptible to grippe1 pneumonia1 typhoid fev]4 ,read+ ! acc\nt ( an accid5t 9 :i* ! body is torn or maim$1 we ourselves feel pa9 9 ! same spot2 :5 ! *ild's h& is cru%$1 ! "m's h&1 ?\gh at a di/ance1 becomes swoll52 ! m$ival /igmata probably result$ f cont9u\s brood+ ^u ! suff]+s ( ,*ri/ 7see ,c>p5t]1 ,m5tal ,physiology1 #fgf-fij74 ,b m5tal /ates may help z well z h>m ! body4 ,m5tal expectancy facilitates cure 9 cases ( sickness4 ,! physician helps ! pati5t by inspir+ hope & c\rage4 ,imag9ation works wond]s1 especially 9 ! case ( n]v\s disord]s4 ,! diseases said to be cur$ by ,*ri/ian ,sci5ce are commonly ( ?is sort4 ,9 e age fakirs1 mesm]i/s1 & quacks h avail$ !mselves ( ^! und]ly+ m5tal =ces4 ,by induc+ expectancy1 imp>t+ c\rage1 r\s+ ! p>alyz$ w1 !y h indirectly caus$ bodily *anges :i* h be5 mi/ak5 = miracle4 ,tacitus tells u ( ! heal+ ( a bl9d man by ! ,emp]or ,vespasian4 ,und\bt$ cures h be5 wr\ght by ! royal t\* 9 ,engl&4 ,s9ce su* wond]s h be5 p]=m$ by ,indian m$ic9e-m51 we _c reg>d !m z hav+ any specific ,*ri/ian "*1 & :51 z 9 ! pres5t case1 we f9d !m us$ to aid 9 ! spread ( false doctr9e ) reg>d to s91 ,*ri/1 atonem5t1 & ! *ur*1 we mu/ class !m ) ! 8ly+ wond]s0 ( :i* we are w>n$ 9 #b ,!ss4 #b3i4 ,see ,h>ris1 ,philosophical ,basis ( ,!ism1 #cha-chf2 ,buckley1 ,fai?-,heal+1 & 9 ,c5tury ,magaz9e1 ,june1 #ahhf3bba-bcf2 ,bruce1 ,miracul\s ,elem5t 9 ,gospels1 lecture #h2 ,&ov] ,review1 #ahhg3bdi-bfd4 ,,iv4 ,prophecy z ,atte/+ a ,div9e ,revelation4 ,we "h consid] prophecy 9 its n>r[ s5se ( m]e pr$iction1 res]v+ to a subsequ5t *apt] ! consid]ation ( prophecy z int]pretation ( ! div9e w 9 g5]al4 #a4 ,def9ition4 ,prophecy is ! =etell+ ( future ev5ts by virtue ( direct communication f ,god--a =etell+1 !re=e1 :i*1 ?\gh n contrav5+ any laws ( ! human m9d1 ^? laws1 if fully kn[n1 w\ld n1 )\t ?is ag5cy ( ,god1 be suffici5t to expla94 ,9 discuss+ ! subject ( prophecy1 we are met at ! outset by ! cont5tion t !re is n1 & nev] has be51 any real =etell+ ( future ev5ts beyond t :i* is possible to natural presci5ce4 ,?is is ! view ( ,ku551 ,prophets & ,prophecy 9 ,israel4 ,pfleid]]1 ,philos4 ,relig41 #b3db1 d5ies any direct pr$iction4 ,prophecy 9 ,israel1 he intimates1 0 simply ! consci\sness ( ,god's righte\sness1 proclaim+ its ideals ( ! future1 & decl>+ t ! w ( ,god is ! moral ideal ( ! good & ! law ( ! _w's hi/ory1 s t ! fates ( nations are condition$ by _! be>+ t[>d ?is moral purpose ( ,god3 8,! fundam5tal error ( ! vulg> apologetics is t x conf\nds prophecy ) hea!n soo?say+--national salvation )\t "*40 ,w4 ,rob]tson ,smi?1 9 ,encyc4 ,britannica1 #ai3hba1 tells u t 8detail$ pr$iction occupies a v second>y place 9 ! writ+s ( ! prophets2 or r inde$ :at seem to be pr$ictions 9 detail are usually only free poetical illu/rations ( hi/orical pr9ciples1 :i* nei!r receiv$ nor dem&$ exact fulfilm5t40 ,z 9 ! case ( miracles1 our fai? 9 an imman5t ,god1 :o is none o!r ?an ! ,logos or l>g] ,*ri/1 gives u a po9t ( view f :i* we may reconcile ! cont5tions ( ! naturali/s & sup]naturali/s4 ,prophecy is an imm$iate act ( ,god2 b1 s9ce all natural g5ius is also due to ,god's en]giz+1 we d n ne$ to d5y ! employm5t ( man's natural gifts 9 prophecy4 ,! in/ances ( telepa?y1 pres5tim5t1 & second sight :i* ! ,society = ,psy*ical ,rese>* has demon/rat$ to be facts %[ t pr$iction1 9 ! hi/ory ( div9e revelation1 may be only an int5sification1 "u ! extraord9>y impulse ( ! div9e ,_s1 ( a p[] t is 9 "s degree lat5t 9 all m54 ,! au?or ( e great "w ( creative imag9ation kn[s t a high] p[] ?an 8 own has possess$ him4 ,9 all human reason !re is a natural activity ( ! div9e ,reason or ,logos1 & he is 8! light :i* lighte? e man0 7,john #a3i74 ,s !re is a natural activity ( ! ,holy ,_s1 & he :o completes ! circle ( ! div9e consci\sness completes also ! circle ( human consci\sness1 gives self-hood to e s\l1 makes available to man ! natural z well z ! spiritual gifts ( ,*ri/2 cf4 ,john #af3ad--8;he %all take ( m9e1 & %all decl>e x unto y40 ,! same ,_s :o 9 ! beg9n+ 8brood$ ov] ! face ( ! wat]s0 7,g54 #a3b7 also broods ov] humanity1 & x is he :o1 accord+ to ,*ri/'s promise1 0 to 8decl>e unto y ! ?+s t are to come0 7,john #af3ac74 ,! gift ( prophecy may h its natural side1 l ! gift ( miracles1 yet may be f9ally explicable only z ! result ( an extraord9>y work+ ( t ,_s ( ,*ri/ :o to "s degree manife/s himself 9 ! reason & consci5ce ( e man2 cf4 #a ,pet #a3aa--8se>*+ :at "t or :at mann] ( "t ! ,_s ( ,*ri/ :i* 0 9 !m did po9t unto1 :5 x te/ifi$ be=eh& ! suff]+s ( ,*ri/1 & ! glories t %\ld foll[ !m40 ,see ,my]s1 ,human ,p]sonality1 #b3bfb-bib4 ,a4 ,b4 ,davidson1 9 8 article on ,prophecy & ,prophets1 9 ,ha/+s' ,bible ,diction>y1 #d3abj1 #aba1 gives little weight to ?is view t prophecy is bas$ on a natural p[] ( ! human m9d3 8,! argum5ts by :i* ,giesebre*t1 ,b]ufsgabung1 #ac ff41 supports ! !ory ( a #8faculty ( pres5tim5t' h little cog5cy4 ,?is faculty is suppos$ to reveal itself p>ticul>ly on ! approa* ( dea? 7,g54 #bh & #di74 ,! contempor>ies ( mo/ great religi\s p]sonages h attribut$ to !m a prophetic gift4 ,! answ] ( ,john ,knox to ^? :o cr$it$ him ) su* a gift is wor? read+3 #8,my assurances are n m>vels ( ,m]l91 nor yet ! d>k s5t5ces ( pr(ane prophecy4 ,b fir/1 ! pla9 tru? ( ,god's ^w2 second1 ! inv9cible ju/ice ( ! ev]la/+ ,god2 & ?ird1 ! ord9>y c\rse ( 8 puni%m5ts & plagues f ! beg9n+1 are my assurances & gr\nds4' 0 ,:ile ,davidson grants ! fulfilm5t ( c]ta9 specific pr$ictions ( ,scripture1 to be h]eaft] m5tion$1 he holds t 8su* pres5tim5ts z we c obs]ve to be au!ntic are *iefly products ( ! consci5ce or moral reason4 ,true prophecy is bas$ on moral gr\nds4 ,ev]y:]e ! m5ac+ future is connect$ ) ! evil pa/ by #8!re=e' 7,micah #c3ab2 ,is4 #e3ac2 ,amos #a3b740 ,we hold ) ,davidson to ! moral elem5t 9 prophecy1 b we also recognize a p[] 9 normal humanity :i* he w\ld m9imize or d5y4 ,we claim t ! human m9d ev5 9 its ord9>y & secul> work+ gives occasional signs ( transc5d+ ! limitations ( ! pres5t4 ,believ+ 9 ! cont9ual activity ( ! div9e ,reason 9 ! reason ( man1 we h no ne$ to d\bt ! possibility ( an extraord9>y insight into ! future1 & su* insight is ne$$ at ! great epo*s ( religi\s hi/ory4 ,expositor's ,gk4 ,te/41 #b3cd--8,savon>ola =etold z e>ly z #adif ! capture ( ,rome1 :i* happ5$ 9 #aebg1 & he did ?is n only 9 g5]al t]ms b 9 detail2 8 words 7 realiz$ to ! lett] :5 ! sacr$ *ur*es ( ,/4 ,pet] & ,/4 ,paul became1 z ! prophet =etold1 /ables = ! conqu]ors' horses40 ,on ! g5]al subject1 see ,payne-,smi?1 ,prophecy a ,prep>ation = ,*ri/2 ,alex&]1 ,*ri/ & ,*ri/ianity2 ,f>r>1 ,sci5ce & ,!ology1 #ajf2 ,newton on ,prophecy2 ,fairbairn on ,prophecy4 #b4 ,relation ( ,prophecy to ,miracles4 ,miracles are atte/ations ( revelation proce$+ f div9e p[]2 prophecy is an atte/ation ( revelation proce$+ f div9e k4 ,only ,god c "k ! cont+5cies ( ! future4 ,! possibility & probability ( prophecy may be argu$ ^u ! same gr\nds ^u :i* we argue ! possibility & probability ( miracles4 ,z an evid5ce ( div9e revelation1 h[ev]1 prophecy possesses two advantages ov] miracles1 namely3 7a7 ,! pro(1 9 ! case ( prophecy1 is n d]iv$ f anci5t te/imony1 b is "u our eyes4 7b7 ,! evid5ce ( miracles _c become /rong]1 :]eas e new fulfilm5t adds to ! argum5t f prophecy4 #c4 ,requirem5ts 9 ,prophecy1 consid]$ z an ,evid5ce ( ,revelation4 7a7 ,! utt]ance mu/ be di/ant f ! ev5t4 7b7 ,no?+ mu/ exi/ to sugge/ ! ev5t to m]ely natural presci5ce4 7c7 ,! utt]ance mu/ be free f ambiguity4 7d7 ,yet x mu/ n be s precise z to secure its own fulfilm5t4 7e7 ,x mu/ be foll[$ 9 due "t by ! ev5t pr$ict$4 ,hume3 8,all prophecies are real miracles1 & only z su* c be admitt$ z pro( ( any revelation40 ,see ,w>dlaw1 ,sy/4 ,!ol41 #a3cdg4 7a7 ,hundr$s ( ye>s int]v5$ betwe5 c]ta9 ( ! ,o4 ,t4 pr$ictions & _! fulfilm5t4 7b7 ,/anley in/ances ! natural sagacity ( ,burke1 :i* enabl$ him to pr$ict ! ,fr5* ,revolution4 ,b ,burke also pr$ict$ 9 #agic t ,france w\ld be p>tition$ l ,pol& among a conf$]acy ( ho/ile p[]s4 ,cann+ pr$ict$ t ,s\? ,am]ican colonies w\ld gr[ up z ! ,unit$ ,/ates _h gr[n4 ,d',israeli pr$ict$ t our ,s\!rn ,conf$]acy w\ld become an indep5d5t nation4 ,+]soll pr$ict$ t )9 t5 ye>s !re w\ld be two !atres = "o *ur*4 7c7 ,illu/rate ambigu\s prophecies by ! ,delphic oracle to ,crsus3 8,cross+ ! riv]1 ?\ de/roye/ a great nation0--:e!r 8 own or 8 enemy's ! oracle left undet]m9$4 8,ibis et r$ibis nunquam p]ibis 9 bello40 7d7 ,/rauss held t ,o4 ,t4 prophecy itself det]m9$ ei!r ! ev5ts or ! n>ratives ( ! gospels4 ,see ,greg1 ,cre$ ( ,*ri/5dom1 *ap4 #d4 7e7 ,c>dan1 ! ,italian ma!matician1 pr$ict$ ! day & h\r ( 8 own dea?1 & committ$ suicide at ! prop] "t to prove ! pr$iction true4 ,jehovah makes ! fulfilm5t ( 8 pr$ictions ! pro( ( 8 deity 9 ! controv]sy ) false gods3 ,is4 #da3bc--8;,decl>e ! ?+s t are to come h]eaft]1 t we may "k t ye are gods02 #db3i--8;,behold1 ! =m] ?+s are come to pass & new ?+s d ,i decl>e3 be=e !y spr+ =? ,i tell y ( !m40 #d4 ,g5]al ,features ( ,prophecy 9 ! ,scriptures4 7a7 ,its l>ge am\nt--occupy+ a great portion ( ! ,bible1 & ext5d+ ov] _m hundr$ ye>s4 7b7 ,its e?ical & religi\s nature--! ev5ts ( ! future be+ reg>d$ z outgr[?s & results ( m5's pres5t attitude t[>d ,god4 7c7 ,its unity 9 div]sity--f9d+ its c5tral po9t 9 ,*ri/ ! true s]vant ( ,god & deliv]] ( 8 p4 7d7 ,its actual fulfilm5t z reg>ds _m ( its pr$ictions--:ile seem+ non-fulfilm5ts are explicable f its figurative & conditional nature4 ,a4 ,b4 ,davidson1 9 ,ha/+s' ,bible ,diction>y1 #d3abe1 has sugge/$ reasons = ! app>5t non-fulfilm5t ( c]ta9 pr$ictions4 ,prophecy is poetical & figurative2 its details are n to be press$2 !y are only drap]y1 ne$$ = ! expression ( ! idea4 ,9 ,isa4 #ac3af--8,_! infants %all be da%$ 9 pieces 444 & _! wives ravi%$0--! prophet gives an ideal picture ( ! sack ( a city2 ^! ?+s did n actually happ51 b ,cyrus ent]$ ,babylon 89 peace40 ,yet ! ess5tial tru? rema9$ t ! city fell into ! enemy's h&s4 ,! pr$iction ( ,ezekiel ) reg>d to ,tyre1 ,ez4 #bf3g-ad1 is recogniz$ 9 ,ez4 #bi3ag-bj z hav+ be5 fulfill$ n 9 its details b 9 its ess5ce--! actual ev5t hav+ be5 ! break+ ( ! p[] ( ,tyre by ,nebu*adnezz>4 ,is4 #ag3a--8;,behold1 ,damascus is tak5 away f be+ a city1 & x %all be a ru9\s heap0--mu/ be int]pret$ z pr$ict+ ! blott+ out ( its dom9ion1 s9ce ,damascus has probably nev] ceas$ to be a city4 ,! conditional nature ( prophecy expla9s o!r seem+ non-fulfilm5ts4 ,pr$ictions 7 (t5 ?reats1 :i* might be revok$ ^u rep5tance4 ,j]4 #bf3ac--8;am5d y\r ways 444 & ! ,"l w rep5t him ( ! evil :i* he ha? pron\nc$ aga9/ y40 ,jonah #c3d--8,yet =ty days1 & ,n9eveh %all be ov]?r[n 4440 #aj--;,god saw _! works1 t !y turn$ f _! evil way2 & ,god rep5t$ ( ! evil1 :i* he said he w\ld d unto !m2 & he did x n2 cf4 ,j]4 #ah3h2 #bf3ai4 ,in/ances ( actual fulfilm5t ( prophecy are f\nd1 accord+ to ,davidson1 9 ,samuel's pr$iction ( "s ?+s t w\ld happ5 to ,saul1 :i* ! hi/ory decl>es did happ5 7#a ,sam4 #a & #aj74 ,j]emiah pr$ict$ ! dea? ( ,hananiah )9 ! ye>1 :i* took place 7,j]4 #bh74 ,micaiah pr$ict$ ! defeat & dea? ( ,ahab at ,ramo?-,gilead 7#a ,k+s #bb74 ,isaiah pr$ict$ ! failure ( ! nor!rn coalition to subdue ,j]usalem 7,is4 #g72 ! ov]?r[ 9 two or ?ree ye>s ( ,damascus & ,nor!rn ,israel be=e ! ,assyrians 7,is4 #h & #ag72 ! failure ( ,s5na*]ib to capture ,j]usalem1 & ! melt+ away ( 8 army 7,is4 #cg3cd-cg74 8,& 9 g5]al1 ap>t f details1 ! ma9 pr$ictions ( ! prophets reg>d+ ,israel & ! nations 7 v]ifi$ 9 hi/ory1 = example1 ,amos #a & #b4 ,! *ief pr$ictions ( ! prophets relate to ! imm95t d[nfall ( ! k+doms ( ,israel & ,judah2 to :at lies beyond ?is1 namely1 ! re/oration ( ! k+dom ( ,god2 & to ! /ate ( ! p 9 _! condition ( f9al felicity40 ,= pr$ictions ( ! exile & ! return ( ,israel1 see especially ,amos #i3i--8;,=1 lo1 ,i w comm&1 & ,i w sift ! h\se ( ,israel among all ! nations1 l z gra9 is sift$ 9 a sieve1 yet %all n ! lea/ k]nel fall ^u ! e>?4444 #ad--;,& ,i w br+ aga9 ! captivity ( my p ,israel1 & !y %all build ! wa/e cities & inhabit !m40 ,ev5 if we accept ! !ory ( composite au?or%ip ( ! book ( ,isaiah1 we /ill h a =etell+ ( ! s5d+ back ( ! ,jews f ,babylon1 & a designation ( ,cyrus z ,god's ag5t1 9 ,is4 #dd3bh--8t sai? ( ,cyrus1 ,he is my %eph]d1 & %all p]=m all my pleasure3 ev5 say+ ( ,j]usalem1 ,%e %all be built2 & ( ! temple1 ,?y f\ndation %all be laid02 see ,george ,adam ,smi?1 9 ,ha/+s' ,bible ,diction>y1 #b3dic4 ,fr$]ick ! ,great said to 8 *apla93 8,give me 9 "o ^w a pro( ( ! div9e orig9 ( ! ,bible02 & ! *apla9 well repli$3 8,! ,jews1 y\r ,maje/y40 ,9 ! case ( ! ,jews we h ev5 n[ ! unique ph5om5a ( a p )\t a l&1 & a l& )\t a p1--yet bo? ^! 7 pr$ict$ c5turies be=e ! ev5t4 #e4 ,messianic ,prophecy 9 g5]al4 7a7 ,direct pr$ictions ( ev5ts--z 9 ,old ,te/am5t prophecies ( ,*ri/'s bir?1 suff]+ & subsequ5t glory4 7b7 ,g5]al prophecy ( ! ,k+dom 9 ! ,old ,te/am5t1 & ( its gradual triumph4 7c7 ,hi/orical types 9 a nation & 9 individuals--z ,jonah & ,david4 7d7 ,prefigurations ( ! future 9 rites & ord9ances--z 9 sacrifice1 circumcision1 & ! passov]4 #f4 ,special ,prophecies utt]$ by ,*ri/4 7a7 ,z to 8 own dea? & resurrection4 7b7 ,z to ev5ts occurr+ betwe5 8 dea? & ! de/ruction ( ,j]usalem 7multitudes ( impo/ors2 w>s & rumors ( w>s2 fam9e & pe/il5ce74 7c7 ,z to ! de/ruction ( ,j]usalem & ! ,jewi% polity 7,j]usalem compass$ ) armies2 abom9ation ( desolation 9 ! holy place2 flight ( ,*ri/ians2 mis]y2 massacre2 disp]sion74 7d7 ,z to ! _w-wide diffusion ( 8 gospel 7! ,bible already ! mo/ widely circulat$ book 9 ! _w74 ,! mo/ important feature 9 prophecy is its ,messianic elem5t2 see ,luke #bd3bg--8;beg9n+ f ,moses & f all ! prophets1 he int]pret$ to !m 9 all ! scriptures ! ?+s conc]n+ himself02 ,acts #aj3dc--8to him be> all ! prophets witness02 ,rev4 #ai3aj--8! te/imony ( ,jesus is ! _s ( prophecy40 ,types are int5d$ resemblances1 design$ prefigurations2 = example1 ,israel is a type ( ! ,*ri/ian *ur*2 outside nations are types ( ! ho/ile _w2 ,jonah & ,david are types ( ,*ri/4 ,! typical nature ( ,israel re/s ^u ! deep] fact ( ! community ( life4 ,z ! life ( ,god ! ,logos lies at ! basis ( univ]sal humanity & int]p5etrates x 9 e "p1 s out ( ?is univ]sal humanity gr[s ,israel 9 g5]al2 out ( ,israel z a nation spr+s ! spiritual ,israel1 & out ( spiritual ,israel ,*ri/ accord+ to ! fle%1--! upw>d ris+ pyramid f9ds its apex & culm9ation 9 him4 ,h5ce ! pr$ictions ) reg>d to 8! s]vant ( ,jehovah0 7,is4 #db3a-g71 & 8! ,messiah0 7,is4 #fa3a2 ,john #a3da71 h p>tial fulfilm5t 9 ,israel1 b p]fect fulfilm5t only 9 ,*ri/2 s ,delitzs*1 ,oehl]1 & ,*eyne on ,isaiah1 #b3bec4 ,sabati]1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #ei--8;,if humanity 7 n pot5tially & 9 "s degree ,immanuel1 ,god ) u1 !re w\ld nev] h issu$ f its bosom he :o bore & reveal$ ?is bless$ "n40 ,g>d9]1 ,o4 ,t4 & ,n4 ,t4 9 _! ,mutual ,relations1 #agj-aid4 ,9 ! ,o4 ,t41 ,jehovah is ! ,r$eem] ( 8 p4 ,he works ?r\gh judges1 prophets1 k+s1 b he himself rema9s ! ,savior2 8x is only ! ,div9e 9 !m t saves02 8,salvation is ( ,jehovah0 7,jonah #b3i74 ,jehovah is manife/$ 9 ! ,davidic ,k+ "u ! mon>*y2 9 ,israel1 ! ,s]vant ( ! ,"l1 dur+ ! exile2 & 9 ! ,messiah1 or ,ano9t$ ,"o1 9 ! po/-exilian p]iod4 ,because ( its consci\s id5tification ) ,jehovah1 ,israel is always a =w>d-look+ p4 ,ea* new judge1 k+1 prophet is reg>d$ z h]ald+ ! com+ reign ( righte\sness & peace4 ,^! e>?ly deliv]]s are salut$ ) raptur\s expectation2 ! prophets express ?is expectation 9 t]ms t transc5d ! possibilities ( ! pres5t2 &1 :5 ?is expectation fails to be fully realiz$1 ! ,messianic hope is simply transf]r$ to a l>g] future4 ,ea* sep>ate prophecy has its drap]y furni%$ by ! prophet's imm$iate surr\nd+s1 & f9ds its occasion 9 "s ev5t ( contemporane\s hi/ory4 ,b by degrees x becomes evid5t t only an ideal & p]fect ,k+ & ,savior c fill out ! requirem5ts ( prophecy4 ,only :5 ,*ri/ appe>s1 does ! real mean+ ( ! v>i\s ,old ,te/am5t pr$ictions become manife/4 ,only !n are m5 able to comb9e ! seem+ly inconsi/5t prophecies ( a prie/ :o is also a k+ 7,psalm #aaj71 & ( a royal b at ! same "t a suff]+ ,messiah 7,isaiah #ec74 ,x is n en\gh = u to ask :at ! prophet himself meant1 or :at 8 e>lie/ he>]s und]/ood1 by 8 prophecy4 ,?is is to reg>d prophecy z hav+ only a s+le1 & t a human1 au?or4 ,) ! _s ( man cop]at$ ! ,_s ( ,*ri/1 ! ,holy ,_s 7#a ,pet4 #a3aa--8! ,_s ( ,*ri/ :i* 0 9 !m02 #b ,pet4 #a3ba--8no prophecy ev] came by ! w ( man2 b m5 spake f ,god1 be+ mov$ by ! ,holy ,_s074 ,all prophecy has a tw(old au?or%ip1 human & div9e2 ! same ,*ri/ :o spoke ?r\gh ! prophets br\ght ab\t ! fulfilm5t ( _! words4 ,x is no wond] t he :o ?r\gh ! prophets utt]$ pr$ictions ) reg>d to himself %\ld1 :5 he became inc>nate1 be ! prophet p> excell5ce 7,deut4 #ah3ae2 ,acts #c3bb--8,moses inde$ said1 ,a prophet %all ! ,"l ,god raise up f among y\r bre?r51 l unto me2 to him %all ye he>k5074 ,9 ! pr$ictions ( ,jesus we f9d ! prop] key to ! int]pretation ( prophecy 9 g5]al1 & ! evid5ce t :ile no "o ( ! ?ree !ories--! pret]i/1 ! cont9ui/1 ! futuri/--furni%es an exhau/ive explanation1 ea* "o ( ^! has its elem5t ( tru?4 ,our ,"l made ! fulfilm5t ( ! pr$iction ( 8 own resurrection a te/ ( 8 div9e commission3 x 0 8! sign ( ,jonah ! prophet0 7,mat4 #ab3ci74 ,he promis$ t 8 disciples %\ld h prophetic gifts3 ,john #ae3ae--8,no long] d ,i call y s]vants2 = ! s]vant kn[e? n :at 8 "l doe?3 b ,i h call$ y fri5ds2 = all ?+s t ,i he>d f my ,fa!r ,i h made kn[n unto y02 #af3ac--8! ,_s ( tru? 444 he %all decl>e unto y ! ?+s t are to come40 ,agabus pr$ict$ ! fam9e & ,paul's imprisonm5t 7,acts #aa3bh2 #ba3aj72 ,paul pr$ict$ h]esies 7,acts #bj3bi1 #cj71 %ipwreck 7,acts #bg3aj1 #ba-bf71 8! man ( s90 7#b ,!ss4 #b3c71 ,*ri/'s second com+1 & ! resurrection ( ! sa9ts 7#a ,!ss4 #d3ae-ag74 #g4 ,on ! d\ble s5se ( ,prophecy4 7a7 ,c]ta9 prophecies app>5tly conta9 a fulness ( mean+ :i* is n exhau/$ by ! ev5t to :i* !y mo/ obvi\sly & lit]ally ref]4 ,a prophecy :i* _h a p>tial fulfilm5t at a "t n remote f its utt]ance1 may f9d its *ief fulfilm5t 9 an ev5t f> di/ant4 ,s9ce ! pr9ciples ( ,god's adm9i/ration f9d ev] recurr+ & ev] enl>g+ illu/ration 9 hi/ory1 prophecies :i* h already _h a p>tial fulfilm5t may h :ole cycles ( fulfilm5t yet be=e !m4 ,9 prophecy !re is an abs5ce ( p]spective2 z 9 ,japanese pictures ! ne> & ! f> appe> equally di/ant2 z 9 dissolv+ views1 ! imm$iate future melts into a future immeasurably f> away4 ,! c&le t %9es ?r\gh a n>r[ ap]ture s5ds out its light ?r\gh an ev]-increas+ area2 sections ( ! triangle correspond to ea* o!r1 b ! m di/ant are f> great] ?an ! ne>4 ,! *let on ! m\nta9-side may turn out to be only a black cat on ! woodpile1 or a speck ^u ! w9d[ pane4 8,a hill :i* appe>s to rise close beh9d ano!r is f\nd on ne>] approa* to h rec$$ a great way f x40 ,! pa9t]1 by =e%ort5+1 br+s toge!r ?+s or p>ts t are relatively di/ant f ea* o!r4 ,! prophet is a pa9t] ^: =e%ort5+s are sup]natural2 he seems fre$ f ! law ( space & "t1 &1 rapt into ! timelessness ( ,god1 he views ! ev5ts ( hi/ory 8sub specie et]nitatis40 ,prophecy 0 ! sket*+ ( an outl9e-map4 ,ev5 ! prophet c\ld n fill up ! outl9e4 ,! abs5ce ( p]spective 9 prophecy may acc\nt = ,paul's be+ misund]/ood by ! ,!ssalonians1 & = ! necessity ( 8 explanations 9 #b ,!ss4 #b3a1 #b4 ,9 ,isaiah #aj & #aa1 ! fall ( ,lebanon 7! ,assyrian7 is imm$iately connect$ ) ! rise ( ! ,bran* 7,*ri/72 9 ,j]emiah #ea3da1 ! fir/ capture & ! complete de/ruction ( ,babylon are connect$ ) ea* o!r1 )\t notice ( ! int]val ( a ?\s& ye>s betwe5 !m4 ,in/ances ( ! d\ble s5se ( prophecy may be f\nd 9 ,is4 #g3ad-af2 #i3f1 #g--8;a virg9 %all conceive & be> a son1 444 unto u a son is giv50--comp>$ ) ,mat4 #a3bb1 #bc1 :]e ! prophecy is appli$ to ,*ri/ 7see ,mey]1 9 loco72 ,hos4 #aa3a--8;,i 444 call$ my son out ( ,egypt0--ref]r+ orig9ally to ! call+ ( ! nation out ( ,egypt--is 9 ,mat4 #b3ae ref]r$ to ,*ri/1 :o embodi$ & consummat$ ! mission ( ,israel2 ,psalm #aah3bb1 #bc--8,! /one :i* ! build]s reject$ is become ! head ( ! corn]0--:i* prim>ily ref]r$ to ! ,jewi% nation1 conqu]$1 c>ri$ away1 & flung aside z ( no use1 b div9ely de/9$ to a future ( importance & gr&eur1 is 9 ,mat4 #ba3db ref]r$ by ,jesus to himself1 z ! true embodim5t ( ,israel4 ,william ,arnold ,/ev5s1 on ,! ,man ( ,s91 9 ,bap4 ,qu>4 ,rev41 ,july1 #ahhi3cbh-cfj--;,z 9 ,daniel #aa3cf1 ! great enemy ( ! fai?1 :o 8%all exalt himself1 & magnify himself above e god10 is ! ,syrian ,k+1 ,antio*us ,epiphanes1 s 8! man ( lawlessness0 describ$ by ,paul 9 #b ,!ss4 #b3c is ! corrupt & impi\s ,judaism ( ! apo/olic age4 ,?is _h its seat 9 ! temple ( ,god1 b 0 doom$ to de/ruction :5 ! ,"l %\ld come at ! fall ( ,j]usalem4 ,b ev5 ?is second fulfilm5t ( ! prophecy does n preclude a future & f9al fulfilm5t4 ,broadus on ,mat41 page #dhj--;,9 ,isaiah #da3h to *apt] #ec1 ! pr$ictions ) reg>d to 8! s]vant ( ,jehovah0 make a gradual transition f ,israel to ! ,messiah1 ! =m] alone be+ se5 9 #da3h1 ! ,messiah also appe>+ 9 #db3a sq41 & ,israel q s9k+ out ( sight 9 *apt] #ec4 ,! mo/ m>k$ illu/ration ( ! d\ble s5se ( prophecy h[ev] is to be f\nd 9 ,mat!w #bd & #be1 especially #bd3cd & #be3ca1 :]e ,*ri/'s prophecy ( ! de/ruction ( ,j]usalem passes into a prophecy ( ! end ( ! _w4 ,adamson1 ,! ,m9d 9 ,*ri/1 #ahc--8,to him hi/ory 0 ! robe ( ,god1 & !re=e a con/ant repetition ( positions really simil>1 kaleidoscopic comb9+ ( a few tru?s1 z ! facts v>i$ 9 :i* !y 7 to be embodi$40 ,a4 ,j4 ,gordon3 8,prophecy has no soon] become hi/ory1 ?an hi/ory 9 turn becomes prophecy40 ,"l ,bacon3 8,div9e prophecies h spr++ & g]m9ant accompli%m5t ?r\gh _m ages1 ?\gh ! height or fulness ( !m may ref] to "s "o age40 ,9 a simil> mann] !re is a manifoldness ( mean+ 9 ,dante's ,div9e ,com$y4 ,c4 ,e4 ,norton1 ,inf]no1 xvi--8,! n>rative ( ! poet's spiritual j\rney is s vivid & consi/5t t x has all ! reality ( an acc\nt ( an actual exp]i5ce2 b )9 & b5ea? runs a /ream ( allegory n less consi/5t & h>dly less cont9u\s ?an ! n>rative itself40 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,! ,great ,poets & _! ,!ology1 #aaf--8;,dante himself has told u t !re are f\r sep>ate s5ses :i* he int5ds 8 /ory to convey4 ,!re are ! lit]al1 ! allegorical1 ! moral1 & ! analogical4 ,9 ,psalm #aad3a we h ! words1 #8,:5 ,israel w5t =? out ( ,egypt4' ,?is1 says ! poet1 may be tak5 lit]ally1 ( ! actual deliv]ance ( ,god's anci5t p2 or allegorically1 ( ! r$emption ( ! _w ?r\gh ,*ri/2 or morally1 ( ! rescue ( ! s9n] f ! bondage ( 8 s92 or anagogically1 ( ! passage ( bo? s\l & body f ! l[] life ( e>? to ! high] life ( heav54 ,s f ,scripture ,dante illu/rates ! me?od ( 8 poem40 ,see fur!r1 our treatm5t ( ,es*atology4 ,see also ,dr4 ,arnold ( ,rugby1 ,s]mons on ! ,int]pretation ( ,scripture1 ,app5dix ,a1 pages #dda-ded2 ,aids to ,fai?1 #ddi-dfb2 ,smi?'s ,bible ,dict41 #d3bgbg4 ,p] contra1 see ,elliott1 ,hor ,apocalyptic1 #d3ffb4 ,g>d9]1 ,o4 ,t4 & ,n4 ,t41 #bfb-bgd1 d5ies d\ble s5se1 b affirms manifold applications ( a s+le s5se4 ,broadus1 on ,mat4 #bd3a1 d5ies d\ble s5se1 b affirms ! use ( types4 7b7 ,! prophet 0 n always aw>e ( ! mean+ ( 8 own prophecies 7#a ,pet4 #a3aa74 ,x is en\gh to con/itute 8 prophecies a pro( ( div9e revelation1 if x c be %[n t ! correspond5ces betwe5 !m & ! actual ev5ts are su* z to indicate div9e wisdom & purpose 9 ! giv+ ( !m--9 o!r words1 x is en\gh if ! inspir+ ,_s knew _! mean+1 ev5 ?\gh ! inspir$ prophet did n4 ,x is n inconsi/5t ) ?is view1 b r confirms x1 t ! ne> ev5t1 & n ! di/ant fulfilm5t1 0 (t5 *iefly1 if n exclusively1 9 ! m9d ( ! prophet :5 he wrote4 ,scripture decl>es t ! prophets did n always und]/& _! own pr$ictions3 #a ,pet4 #a3aa--8se>*+ :at "t or :at mann] ( "t ! ,_s ( ,*ri/ :i* 0 9 !m did po9t unto1 :5 x te/ifi$ be=eh& ! suff]+s ( ,*ri/1 & ! glories t %\ld foll[ !m40 ,em]son3 8,himself f ,god he c\ld n free2 ,he build$ bett] ?an he knew40 ,keble3 8,z little *ildr5 lisp & tell ( heav51 ,s ?\ghts beyond _! ?\ghts to ^? high b>ds 7 giv540 ,we/cott3 ,preface to ,com4 on ,hebrews1 vi--8,no "o w\ld limit ! tea*+ ( a poet's words to t :i* 0 def9itely pres5t to 8 m9d4 ,/ill less c we suppose t he :o is inspir$ to give a message ( ,god to all ages sees himself ! complet5ess ( ! tru? :i* all life s]ves to illum9ate40 ,alex&] ,mc,laren3 8,pet] tea*es t ,jewi% prophets =etold ! ev5ts ( ,*ri/'s life & especially 8 suff]+s2 t !y did s z organs ( ,god's ,_s2 t !y 7 s completely organs ( a high] voice t !y did n und]/& ! significance ( _! own words1 b 7 wis] ?an !y knew & _h to se>* :at 7 ! date & ! *>act]i/ics ( ! /range ?+s :i* !y =etold2 & t by fur!r revelation !y le>n$ t #8! vision is yet = _m days' 7,is4 #bd3bb2 ,dan4 #aj3ad74 ,if ,pet] 0 "r 9 8 conception ( ! nature ( ,messianic prophecy1 a good _m le>n$ m5 ( to-day are wrong40 ,mat!w ,arnold1 ,lit]ature & ,dogma3 8,might n ! prophetic ideals be poetic dreams1 & ! correspond5ce betwe5 !m & ! life ( ,jesus1 s f> z real1 only a curi\s hi/orical ph5om5on80 ,bruce1 ,apologetics1 #cei1 replies3 8,su* scepticism is possible only to ^? :o h no fai? 9 a liv+ ,god :o works out purposes 9 hi/ory40 ,x is comp>able only to ! unbelief ( ! mat]iali/ :o reg>ds ! physical con/itution ( ! univ]se z explicable by ! =tuit\s conc\rse ( atoms4 #h4 ,purpose ( ,prophecy--s f> z x is yet unfulfill$4 7a7 ,n to enable u to map out ! details ( ! future2 b r 7b7 ,to give g5]al assurance ( ,god's p[] & =esee+ wisdom1 & ( ! c]ta9ty ( 8 triumph2 & 7c7 ,to furni%1 aft] fulfilm5t1 ! pro( t ,god saw ! end f ! beg9n+4 ,dan4 #ab3h1 #i--8;,& ,i he>d1 b ,i und]/ood n2 !n said ,i1 ,o my ,"l1 :at %all be ! issue ( ^! ?+s8 ,& he said1 ,g ?y way1 ,daniel2 = ! words are %ut up & seal$ till ! "t ( ! end02 #b ,pet4 #a3ai--prophecy is 8a lamp %9+ 9 a d>k place1 until ! day dawn0--n until day dawns c di/ant objects be se52 #bj--8no prophecy ( scripture is ( private int]pretation0--only ,god1 by ! ev5t1 c int]pret x4 ,sir ,isaac ,newton3 8,god gave ! prophecies1 n to gratify m5's curiosity by enabl+ !m to =ekn[ ?+s1 b t aft] !y 7 fulfill$ !y might be int]pret$ by ! ev5t1 & 8 own provid5ce1 n ! int]pret]'s1 be !reby manife/$ to ! _w40 ,alex&] ,mc,laren3 8,great tracts ( ,scripture are d>k to u till life expla9s !m1 & !n !y come on u ) ! =ce ( a new revelation1 l ! messages :i* ( old 7 s5t by a /rip ( p>*m5t coil$ ^u a bton & !n writt5 ^u1 & :i* 7 un9telligible unless ! receiv] _h a correspond+ bton to wrap !m r\nd40 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,! ,great ,poets & _! ,!ology1 #bc--8;,ar*ilo*us1 a poet ( ab\t #gjj ,b4 ,c41 speaks ( #8a griev\s scytale'--! scytale be+ ! /aff on :i* a /rip ( lea!r = writ+ purposes 0 roll$ slantwise1 s t ! message inscrib$ ^u ! /rip c\ld n be read until ! lea!r 0 roll$ aga9 ^u ano!r /aff ( ! same size2 s9ce only ! writ] & ! receiv] possess$ /aves ( ! prop] size1 ! scytale answ]$ all ! ends ( a message 9 cyph]40 ,prophecy is l ! ,g]man s5t5ce1--x c be und]/ood only :5 we h read its la/ ^w4 ,a4 ,j4 ,gordon1 ,m9i/ry ( ! ,_s1 #dh--8;,god's provid5ce is l ! ,hebrew ,bible2 we mu/ beg9 at ! end & read backw>d1 9 ord] to und]/& x40 ,yet ,dr4 ,gordon seems to ass]t t su* und]/&+ is possible ev5 be=e fulfilm5t3 8,*ri/ did n "k ! day ( ! end :5 "h 9 8 /ate ( humiliation2 b he does "k n[4 ,he has %[n 8 k 9 ! ,apocalypse1 & we h receiv$ #8,! ,revelation ( ,jesus ,*ri/1 :i* ,god gave him to %[ unto 8 s]vants1 ev5 ! ?+s :i* mu/ %ortly come to pass' 7,rev4 #a3a740 ,a /udy h[ev] ( ! multitud9\s & conflict+ views ( ! s-call$ int]pret]s ( prophecy leads u to pref] to ,dr4 ,gordon's view t ( ,briggs1 ,messianic ,prophecies1 #di--8,! fir/ adv5t is ! resolv] ( all ,old ,te/am5t prophecy2 444 ! second adv5t w give ! key to ,new ,te/am5t prophecy4 ,x is #8! ,lamb t ha? be5 sla9' 7,rev4 #e3ab7 444 :o alone op5s ! seal$ book1 solves ! riddles ( "t1 & resolves ! symbols ( prophecy40 ,nitzs*3 8,x is ! ess5tial condition ( prophecy t x %\ld n di/urb man's relation to hi/ory40 ,9 s f> z ?is is =gott51 & x is falsely assum$ t ! purpose ( prophecy is to enable u to map out ! precise ev5ts ( ! future be=e !y occur1 ! /udy ( prophecy m9i/]s to a diseas$ imag9ation & div]ts att5tion f practical ,*ri/ian duty4 ,calv93 8,aut insanum inv5iet aut faciet02 or1 z ,"l ,br\gham translat$ x3 8,! /udy ( prophecy ei!r f9ds a man crazy1 or x leaves him s40 ,second ,adv5ti/s d n (t5 seek conv]sions4 ,dr4 ,cumm+ w>n$ ! wom5 ( 8 flock t !y mu/ n /udy prophecy s mu* z to neglect _! h\sehold duties4 ,paul has su* 9 m9d 9 #b ,!ss4 #b3a1 #b--8t\*+ ! com+ ( our ,"l ,jesus ,*ri/ 444 t ye be n quickly %ak5 f y\r m9d 444 z t ! day ( ! ,"l is j at h&02 #c3aa--8;,= we he> ( "s t walk among y disord]ly40 #i4 ,evid5tial =ce ( ,prophecy--s f> z x is fulfill$4 ,prophecy1 l miracles1 does n /& alone z evid5ce ( ! div9e commission ( ! ,scripture writ]s & tea*]s4 ,x is simply a corroborative atte/ation1 :i* unites ) miracles to prove t a religi\s tea*] has come f ,god & speaks ) div9e au?ority4 ,we _c1 h[ev]1 disp5se ) ?is portion ( ! evid5ces1--= unless ! dea? & resurrection ( ,*ri/ are ev5ts =ekn[n & =etold by himself1 z well z by ! anci5t prophets1 we lose "o ma9 pro( ( 8 au?ority z a tea*] s5t f ,god4 ,/e>ns1 ,evid5ce ( ,*ri/ian ,exp]i5ce1 #cch--8,! ,*ri/ian's own life is ! progressive fulfilm5t ( ! prophecy t :oev] accepts ,*ri/'s grace %all be born aga91 sanctifi$1 & sav$4 ,h5ce ! ,*ri/ian c believe 9 ,god's p[] to pr$ict1 & 9 ,god's actual pr$ictions40 ,see ,/anley ,lea!s1 ,o4 ,t4 ,prophecy1 xvii--8,unless we h access to ! sup]natural1 we h no access to ,god40 ,9 our discussions ( prophecy1 we are to rememb] t be=e mak+ ! tru? ( ,*ri/ianity /& or fall ) any p>ticul> passage t has be5 reg>d$ z pr$iction1 we mu/ be c]ta9 t ! passage is meant z pr$iction1 & n z m]ely figurative description4 ,gladd51 ,sev5 ,puzzl+ ,bible ,books1 #aie--8,! book ( ,daniel is n a prophecy1--x is an apocalypse4444 ,! au?or ( su* books puts 8 words into ! m\? ( "s hi/orical or traditional writ] ( em95ce4 ,su* are ! ,book ( ,eno*1 ! ,assumption ( ,moses1 ,b>u*1 #a & #b ,esdras1 & ! ,sibyll9e ,oracles4 ,enigmatic =m indicates p]sons )\t nam+ !m1 & hi/oric ev5ts z animal =ms or z op]ations ( nature4444 ,! book ( ,daniel is n int5d$ to tea* u hi/ory4 ,x does n look =w>d f ! six? c5tury be=e ,*ri/1 b backw>d f ! second c5tury be=e ,*ri/4 ,x is a k9d ( /ory :i* ! ,jews call$ ,haggada4 ,x is aim$ at ,antio*us ,epiphanes1 :o1 f 8 occasional fits ( melan*oly1 0 call$ ,epimanes1 or ,antio*us ! ,mad40 ,:atev] may be our conclusion z to ! au?or%ip ( ! book ( ,daniel1 we mu/ recognize 9 x an elem5t ( pr$iction :i* has be5 actually fulfill$4 ,! mo/ radical int]pret]s d n place its date lat] ?an #afc ,b4 ,c4 ,our ,"l sees 9 ! book cle> ref]5ce to himself 7,mat4 #bf3fd--8! ,son ( man1 sitt+ at ! "r h& ( ,p[]1 & com+ on ! cl\ds ( heav502 cf4 ,dan4 #g3ac72 & he repeats ) emphasis c]ta9 pr$ictions ( ! prophet :i* 7 yet unfulfill$ 7,mat4 #bd3ae--8,:5 ye see ! abom9ation ( desolation1 :i* 0 spok5 ( ?r\gh ,daniel ! prophet02 cf4 ,dan4 #i3bg2 #aa3ca2 #ab3aa74 ,! book ( ,daniel mu/ !re=e be c\nt$ pr(itable n only = its moral & spiritual lessons1 b also = its actual pr$ictions ( ,*ri/ & ( ! univ]sal triumph ( 8 k+dom 7,dan4 #b3de--8;a /one cut out ( ! m\nta9 )\t h&s074 ,see on ,daniel1 ,ha/+s' ,bible ,diction>y2 ,f>r>1 9 ,expositor's ,bible4 ,on ! g5]al subject see ,annotat$ ,p>agraph ,bible1 ,introd4 to ,prophetical ,books2 ,cairns1 on ,pres5t ,/ate ( ,*ri/ian ,argum5t f ,prophecy1 9 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #e3 no4 #bg2 ,ed]%eim1 ,prophecy & ,hi/ory2 ,briggs1 ,messianic ,prophecy2 ,r$=d1 ,prophecy1 its ,nature & ,evid5ce2 ,willis ,j4 ,bee*]1 ! ,prophet & ! ,promise2 ,orr1 ,problem ( ! ,o4 ,t41 #dee-dfe4 ,hav+ ?us remov$ ! presumption orig9ally exi/+ aga9/ miracles & prophecy1 we may n[ consid] ! ord9>y laws ( evid5ce & det]m9e ! rules to be foll[$ 9 e/imat+ ! weight ( ! ,scripture te/imony4 ,v4 ,pr9ciples ( ,hi/orical ,evid5ce applicable to ! ,pro( ( a ,div9e ,revelation4 ,,pr9ciples ,,( ,,hi/orical ,,evid5ce ,,applicable ,,to ,,! ,,pro( ,,( ,a ,,div9e ,,revelation 7ma9ly d]iv$ f ,gre5leaf1 ,te/imony ( ! ,evangeli/s1 & f ,/>kie on ,evid5ce74 #a4 ,z to docum5t>y evid5ce4 7a7 ,docum5ts app>5tly anci5t1 n be>+ ^u _! face ! m>ks ( =g]y1 & f\nd 9 prop] cu/ody1 are presum$ to be g5u9e until suffici5t evid5ce is br\ght to ! contr>y4 ,! ,new ,te/am5t docum5ts1 s9ce !y are f\nd 9 ! cu/ody ( ! *ur*1 _! natural & legitimate depository1 mu/ by ?is rule be presum$ to be g5u9e4 ,! ,*ri/ian docum5ts 7 n f\nd1 l ! ,book ( ,mormon1 9 a cave1 or 9 ! cu/ody ( angels4 ,m>t9eau1 ,seat ( ,au?ority1 #cbb--8,! ,mormon prophet1 :o _c tell ,god f devil close at h&1 is well up ) ! hi/ory ( bo? worlds1 & commission$ to get ready ! second promis$ l&40 ,wa%+ton ,gladd51 ,:o wrote ! ,bible8--8,an angel appe>$ to ,smi? & told him :]e he w\ld f9d ?is book2 he w5t to ! spot designat$ & f\nd 9 a /one box a volume six in*es ?ick1 compos$ ( ?9 gold plates1 eight in*es by sev51 held toge!r by ?ree gold r+s2 ^! plates 7 cov]$ ) writ+1 9 ! #8,re=m$ ,egyptian tongue'2 ) ?is book 7 ! #8,urim & ,?ummim'1 a pair ( sup]natural spectacles1 by means ( :i* he 0 able to read & translate ?is #8,re=m$ ,egyptian' language40 ,sagebe]1 ,! ,bible 9 ,c\rt1 #aac--8;,if ! l$g] ( a bus9ess firm has always be5 receiv$ & reg>d$ z a l$g]1 its value is n at all impea*$ if x is impossible to tell :i* p>ticul> cl]k kept ?is l$g]4444 ,! epi/le to ! ,hebrews w\ld be no less valuable z evid5ce1 if %[n n to h be5 writt5 by ,paul40 ,see ,/>kie on ,evid5ce1 #dhj sq42 ,*alm]s1 ,*ri/ian ,revelation1 9 ,works1 #c3adg-aga4 7b7 ,copies ( anci5t docum5ts1 made by ^? mo/ int]e/$ 9 _! fai?fulness1 are presum$ to correspond ) ! orig9als1 ev5 al?\gh ^? orig9als no long] exi/4 ,s9ce x 0 ! *ur*'s int]e/ to h fai?ful copies1 ! burd5 ( pro( re/s ^u ! objector to ! ,*ri/ian docum5ts4 ,^u ! evid5ce ( a copy ( its own records1 ! orig9als hav+ be5 lo/1 ! ,h\se ( ,lords decid$ a claim to ! pe]age2 see ,/>kie on ,evid5ce1 #ea4 ,!re is no manuscript ( ,sophocles e>li] ?an ! t5? c5tury1 :ile at lea/ two manuscripts ( ! ,n4 ,t4 g back to ! f\r? c5tury4 ,fr$]ick ,george ,k5yon1 ,h&book to ,textual ,criticism ( ,n4 ,t43 8,we owe our k ( mo/ ( ! great works ( ,greek & ,lat9 lit]ature--s*ylus1 ,sophocles1 ,?ucydides1 ,horace1 ,lucretius1 ,tacitus1 & _m m--to manuscripts writt5 f #ijj to #aejj ye>s aft] _! au?ors' dea?s2 :ile ( ! ,n4 ,t4 we h two excell5t & approximately complete copies at an int]val ( only #bej ye>s4 ,aga91 ( ! classical writ]s we h z a rule only a few score ( copies 7(t5 less71 ( :i* "o or two /& out z decisively sup]ior to all ! re/2 b ( ! ,n4 ,t4 we h m ?an #cjjj copies 7besides a v l>ge numb] ( v]sions71 & _m ( ^! h di/9ct & indep5d5t value40 ,! "m ( ,tis*5dorf nam$ him ,lobgott1 because h] fe> t h] babe w\ld be born bl9d _h n come true4 ,no man ev] _h ke5] sight ?an he4 ,he sp5t 8 life 9 deciph]+ old manuscripts :i* o!r eyes c\ld n read4 ,! ,s9aitic manuscript :i* he discov]$ takes u back )9 ?ree c5turies ( ! "t ( ! apo/les4 7c7 ,9 det]m9+ matt]s ( fact1 aft] ! lapse ( consid]able "t1 docum5t>y evid5ce is to be all[$ great] weight ?an oral te/imony4 ,nei!r memory nor tradition c long be tru/$ to give absolutely correct acc\nts ( p>ticul> facts4 ,! ,new ,te/am5t docum5ts1 !re=e1 are ( great] weight 9 evid5ce ?an tradition w\ld be1 ev5 if only ?irty ye>s _h elaps$ s9ce ! dea? ( ! actors 9 ! sc5es !y relate4 ,see ,/>kie on ,evid5ce1 #ea1 #gcj4 ,! ,roman ,ca?olic ,*ur*1 9 its leg5ds ( ! sa9ts1 %[s h[ quickly m]e tradition c become corrupt4 ,abraham ,l9coln 0 assass9at$ 9 #ahfe1 yet s]mons prea*$ to-day on ! anniv]s>y ( 8 bir? make him out to be ,unit>ian1 ,univ]sali/1 or ,or?odox1 accord+ z ! prea*] himself believes4 #b4 ,z to te/imony 9 g5]al4 7a7 ,9 que/ions z to matt]s ( fact1 ! prop] inquiry is n :e!r x is possible t ! te/imony may be false1 b :e!r !re is suffici5t probability t x is true4 ,x is unfair1 !re=e1 to all[ our exam9ation ( ! ,scripture witnesses to be prejudic$ by suspicion1 m]ely because _! /ory is a sacr$ "o4 ,!re mu/ be no prejudice aga9/1 !re mu/ be op5-m9d$ness to1 tru?2 !re mu/ be a normal aspiration aft] ! signs ( communication f ,god4 ,telepa?y1 =ty days fa/+1 p>!nog5esis1 all ^! might once h seem$ antec$5tly incr$ible4 ,n[ we see t x w\ld h be5 m rational to admit _! exi/5ce on pres5tation ( appropriate evid5ce4 7b7 ,a proposition ( fact is prov$ :5 its tru? is e/abli%$ by compet5t & satisfactory evid5ce4 ,by compet5t evid5ce is meant su* evid5ce z ! nature ( ! ?+ to be prov$ admits4 ,by satisfactory evid5ce is meant t am\nt ( pro( :i* ord9>ily satisfies an unprejudic$ m9d beyond a reasonable d\bt4 ,scripture facts are !re=e prov$ :5 !y are e/abli%$ by t k9d & degree ( evid5ce :i* w\ld 9 ! affairs ( ord9>y life satisfy ! m9d & consci5ce ( a common man4 ,:5 we h ?is k9d & degree ( evid5ce x is unreasonable to require m4 ,9 matt]s ( morals & religion compet5t evid5ce ne$ n be ma!matical or ev5 logical4 ,! majority ( cases 9 crim9al c\rts are decid$ ^u evid5ce t is circum/antial4 ,we d n det]m9e our *oice ( fri5ds or ( p>tn]s 9 life by /rict processes ( reason+4 ,! he>t z well z ! head mu/ be p]mitt$ a voice1 & compet5t evid5ce includes consid]ations aris+ f ! moral ne$s ( ! s\l4 ,! evid5ce1 moreov]1 does n require to be demon/rative4 ,ev5 a slight balance ( probability1 :5 no?+ m c]ta9 is atta9able1 may suffice to con/itute rational pro( & to b9d our moral action4 7c7 ,9 ! abs5ce ( circum/ances :i* g5]ate suspicion1 e witness is to be presum$ cr$ible1 until ! contr>y is %[n2 ! burd5 ( impea*+ 8 te/imony ly+ ^u ! objector4 ,! pr9ciple :i* leads m5 to give true witness to facts is /rong] ?an t :i* leads !m to give false witness4 ,x is !re=e unju/ to compel ! ,*ri/ian to e/abli% ! cr$ibility ( 8 witnesses be=e proce$+ to adduce _! te/imony1 & x is equally unju/ to all[ ! uncorroborat$ te/imony ( a pr(ane writ] to outweigh t ( a ,*ri/ian writ]4 ,*ri/ian witnesses %\ld n be consid]$ int]e/$1 & !re=e untru/wor?y2 = !y became ,*ri/ians aga9/ _! worldly int]e/s1 & because !y c\ld n resi/ ! =ce ( te/imony4 ,v>y+ acc\nts among !m %\ld be e/imat$ z we e/imate ! v>y+ acc\nts ( pr(ane writ]s4 ,john's acc\nt ( ,jesus diff]s f t ( ! synoptic gospels2 b 9 a v simil> mann]1 & probably = a v simil> reason1 ,plato's acc\nt ( ,socrates diff]s f t ( ,x5ophon4 ,ea* saw & describ$ t side ( 8 subject :i* he 0 by nature be/ fitt$ to compreh5d1--comp>e ! ,v5ice ( ,canaletto ) ! ,v5ice ( ,turn]1 ! =m] ! picture ( an exp]t draughtsman1 ! latt] ! vision ( a poet :o sees ! palaces ( ! ,doges glorifi$ by air & mi/ & di/ance4 ,9 ,*ri/ !re 0 a 8hid+ ( 8 p[]0 7,hab4 #c3d72 8h[ small a :isp] d we he> ( him60 7,job #bf3ad72 he1 r ?an ,%akespe>e1 is 8! myriad-m9d$02 no "o evangeli/ c be expect$ to "k or describe him except 89 "p0 7#a ,cor4 #ac3ab74 ,frances ,p[] ,cobbe1 ,life1 #b3djb--8;,all ( u human be+s resemble diamonds1 9 hav+ sev]al di/9ct facets to our *>act]s2 &1 z we always turn "o ( ^! to "o p]son & ano!r to ano!r1 !re is g5]ally "s fre% side to be se5 9 a p>ticul>ly brilliant gem40 ,e4 ,p4 ,t5ney1 ,coronation1 #de--8,! secret & p[]ful life he ! h]o ( ! /ory 0 lead+ 0 l c]ta9 solit>y /reams1 deep1 wide1 & swift1 :i* run unse5 ?r\gh va/ & unfrequ5t$ =e/s4 ,s wide & v>i$ 0 ?is man's nature1 t :ole c\rses ( life might ?rive 9 its secret places1--& 8 neighbors might t\* him & "k him only on t side on :i* he 0 l !m40 7d7 ,a slight am\nt ( positive te/imony1 s long z x is uncontradict$1 outweighs a v great am\nt ( te/imony t is m]ely negative4 ,! sil5ce ( a second witness1 or 8 te/imony t he did n see a c]ta9 alleg$ occurr5ce1 _c c\nt]balance ! positive te/imony ( a fir/ witness t he did see x4 ,we %\ld !re=e e/imate ! sil5ce ( pr(ane writ]s ) reg>d to facts n>rat$ 9 ,scripture precisely z we %\ld e/imate x if ! facts ab\t :i* !y are sil5t 7 n>rat$ by o!r pr(ane writ]s1 in/ead ( be+ n>rat$ by ! writ]s ( ,scripture4 ,egyptian monum5ts make no m5tion ( ! de/ruction ( ,ph>aoh & 8 army2 b !n1 ,napoleon's dispat*es also make no m5tion ( 8 defeat at ,trafalg>4 ,at ! tomb ( ,napoleon 9 ! ,invalides ( ,p>is1 ! walls are inscrib$ ) names ( a multitude ( places :]e 8 battles 7 f\ght1 b ,wat]loo1 ! sc5e ( 8 great defeat1 is n record$ !re4 ,s ,s5na*]ib1 9 all 8 monum5ts1 does n ref] to ! de/ruction ( 8 army 9 ! "t ( ,hezekiah4 ,napoleon ga!r$ #dej1jjj m5 at ,dresd5 to invade ,russia4 ,at ,mosc[ ! s(t-fall+ sn[ conqu]$ him4 ,9 "o night #bj1jjj horses p]i%$ ) cold4 ,n )\t reason at ,mosc[1 on ! anniv]s>y ( ! retreat ( ! ,fr5*1 ! exultation ( ! prophet ov] ! fall ( ,s5na*]ib is read 9 ! *ur*es4 ,james ,rob]tson1 ,e>ly ,hi/ory ( ,israel1 #cie1 note--8,:ately1 9 8 ,hi/oric ,d\bts1 draws att5tion to ! fact t ! pr9cipal ,p>isian j\rnal 9 #ahad1 on ! v day on :i* ! alli$ armies ent]$ ,p>is z conqu]ors1 makes no m5tion ( any su* ev5t4 ,! battle ( ,poicti]s 9 #gcb1 :i* effectually *eck$ ! spread ( ,mohamm$anism across ,europe1 is n once ref]r$ to 9 ! mona/ic annals ( ! p]iod4 ,sir ,?omas ,br[ne liv$ ?r\gh ! ,civil ,w>s & ! ,commonweal?1 yet !re is no syllable 9 8 writ+s ) reg>d to !m4 ,sale says t circumcision is reg>d$ by ,mohamm$ans z an anci5t div9e in/itution1 ! rite hav+ be5 9 use _m ye>s be=e ,mohamm$1 yet x is n s mu* z once m5tion$ 9 ! ,koran40 ,ev5 ?\gh we %\ld grant t ,josephus does n m5tion ,jesus1 we %\ld h a p>allel 9 ,?ucydides1 :o nev] once m5tions ,socrates1 ! mo/ important "* ( ! tw5ty ye>s embrac$ 9 8 hi/ory4 ,wiesel]1 h[ev]1 9 ,jahrbu* f4 d4 ,!ologie1 #bc3ih1 ma9ta9s ! ess5tial g5u95ess ( ! commonly reject$ passage ) reg>d to ,jesus 9 ,josephus1 ,antiq41 #ah3c3c1 omitt+1 h[ev]1 z int]polations1 ! phrases3 8if x be "r to call him man02 8?is 0 ! ,*ri/02 8he appe>$ alive ! ?ird day accord+ to prophecy02 = ^!1 if g5u9e1 w\ld prove ,josephus a ,*ri/ian1 :i* he1 by all anci5t acc\nts1 0 n4 ,josephus liv$ f ,a4 ,d4 #cd to possibly #aad4 ,he does else:]e speak ( ,*ri/2 = he records 7#bj3i3a7 t ,alb9us 8assembl$ ! ,sanh$rim ( judges1 & br\ght be=e !m ! bro!r ( ,jesus :o 0 call$ ,*ri/1 ^: "n 0 ,james1 & "s o!rs 444 & deliv]$ !m to be /on$40 ,see ,niese's new edition ( ,josephus2 also a monograph on ! subject by ,gu/av ,adolph ,mll]1 publi%$ at ,innsbruck1 #ahij4 ,ru% ,rhees1 ,life ( ,jesus ( ,naz>e?1 #bb--8,to m5tion ,jesus m fully w\ld h requir$ "s approval ( 8 life & tea*+4 ,?is w\ld h be5 a condemnation ( 8 own p :om he desir$ to comm5d to ,g5tile reg>d1 & he seems to h tak5 ! c[>dly c\rse ( sil5ce conc]n+ a matt] m notewor?y1 = t g5]ation1 ?an mu* else ( :i* he writes v fully40 7e7 8,! cr$it due to ! te/imony ( witnesses dep5ds ^u3 fir/1 _! ability2 secondly1 _! hone/y2 ?irdly1 _! numb] & ! consi/5cy ( _! te/imony2 f\r?ly1 ! con=mity ( _! te/imony ) exp]i5ce2 & fif?ly1 ! co9cid5ce ( _! te/imony ) collat]al circum/ances40 ,we confid5tly submit ! ,new ,te/am5t witnesses to ea* & all ( ^! te/s4 ,see ,/>kie on ,evid5ce1 #gbf4 ,*apt] ,,ii4 ,positive ,pro(s ,t ,! ,scriptures ,are ,a ,div9e ,revelation4 ,i4 ,g5u95ess ( ! ,*ri/ian ,docum5ts4 ,,! ,,g5u95ess ,,( ,,! ,,*ri/ian ,,docum5ts1 or pro( t ! books ( ! ,old & ,new ,te/am5ts 7 writt5 at ! age to :i* !y are assign$ & by ! m5 or class ( m5 to :om !y are ascrib$4 ,our pres5t discussion comprises ! fir/ "p1 & only ! fir/ "p1 ( ! doctr9e ( ! ,canon 71 a measur+-re$2 h5ce1 a rule1 a /&>d74 ,x is important to obs]ve t ! det]m9ation ( ! ,canon1 or li/ ( ! books ( sacr$ ,scripture1 is n ! "w ( ! *ur* z an organiz$ body4 ,we d n receive ^! books ^u ! au?ority ( ,fa!rs or ,c\ncils4 ,we receive !m1 only z ! ,fa!rs & ,c\ncils receiv$ !m1 because we h evid5ce t !y are ! writ+s ( ! m51 or class ( m51 ^: names !y be>1 & t !y are also cr$ible & inspir$4 ,if ! previ\s epi/le allud$ to 9 #a ,cor4 #e3i %\ld be discov]$ & be univ]sally judg$ au!ntic1 x c\ld be plac$ ) ,paul's o!r lett]s & c\ld =m "p ( ! ,canon1 ev5 ?\gh x has be5 lo/ = #ahjj ye>s4 ,bruce1 ,apologetics1 #cba--8;,ab/ractly ! ,canon is an op5 "q4 ,x c nev] be any?+ else on ! pr9ciples ( ,prote/antism :i* =bid u to accept ! decisions ( *ur* c\ncils1 :e!r anci5t or mod]n1 z f9al4 ,b practically ! "q ( ! ,canon is clos$40 ,! ,we/m9/] ,confession says t ! au?ority ( ! ^w ( ,god 8does n re/ ^u hi/oric evid5ce2 x does n re/ ^u ! au?ority ( ,c\ncils2 x does n re/ ^u ! cons5t ( ! pa/ or ! excell5ce ( ! matt]2 b x re/s ^u ! ,_s ( ,god be>+ witness to our he>ts conc]n+ its div9e au?ority40 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #bd--8,! value ( ! ,scriptures to u does n dep5d ^u our kn[+ :o wrote !m4 ,9 ! ,o4 ,t4 half its pages are ( unc]ta9 au?or%ip4 ,new dates mean new au?or%ip4 ,criticism is a duty1 = dates ( au?or%ip give means ( int]pretation4 ,! ,scriptures h p[] because ,god is 9 !m1 & because !y describe ! entrance ( ,god into ! life ( man40 ,sa9t9e1 ,picciola1 #ghb--8;,has n a feeble re$ provid$ man ) 8 fir/ arr[1 8 fir/ p51 8 fir/ in/rum5t ( music80 ,hugh ,macmillan3 8,! idea ( /r+$ in/rum5ts 0 fir/ d]iv$ f ! twang ( ! well /rung b[1 z ! ar*] %ot 8 arr[s2 ! lyre & ! h>p :i* disc\rse ! sweete/ music ( peace 7 inv5t$ by ^? :o fir/ he>d ?is inspir+ s\nd 9 ! excitem5t ( battle4 ,& s !re is no music s delightful amid ! j>r+ discord ( ! _w1 turn+ ev]y?+ to music & h>moniz+ e>? & heav51 z :5 ! he>t rises out ( ! gloom ( ang] & rev5ge1 & conv]ts its b[ into a h>p1 & s+s to x ! ,"l's song ( inf9ite =giv5ess40 ,george ,adam ,smi?1 ,mod4 ,criticism & ,prea*+ ( ,o4 ,t41 #e--8,! *ur* has nev] r5\nc$ h] lib]ty to revise ! ,canon4 ,! lib]ty at ! beg9n+ _c be m ?an ! lib]ty !reaft]4 ,! ,holy ,_s has n =sak5 ! lead]s ( ! *ur*4 ,apo/olic writ]s n[h]e def9e ! limits ( ! ,canon1 any m ?an ,jesus did4 ,inde$1 !y employ$ extra-canonical writ+s4 ,*ri/ & ! apo/les n[h]e b\nd ! *ur* to believe all ! tea*+s ( ! ,o4 ,t4 ,*ri/ discrim9ates1 & =bids ! lit]al int]pretation ( its cont5ts4 ,_m ( ! apo/olic int]pretations *all5ge our s5se ( tru?4 ,mu* ( _! exegesis 0 tempor>y & false4 ,_! judgm5t 0 t mu* 9 ! ,o4 ,t4 0 rudim5t>y4 ,?is op5s ! "q ( developm5t 9 revelation1 & ju/ifies ! attempt to fix ! hi/oric ord]4 ,! ,n4 ,t4 criticism ( ! ,o4 ,t4 gives ! lib]ty ( criticism1 & ! ne$1 & ! obligation ( x4 ,o4 ,t4 criticism is n1 l ,baur's ( ! ,n4 ,t41 ! result ( a priori ,hegelian reason+4 ,f ! "t ( ,samuel we h real hi/ory4 ,! prophets d n appeal to miracles4 ,!re is m gospel 9 ! book ( ,jonah1 :5 x is treat$ z a p>able4 ,! ,o4 ,t4 is a gradual e?ical revelation ( ,god4 ,few realize t ! *ur* ( ,*ri/ has a high] w>rant = h] ,canon ( ! ,o4 ,t4 ?an %e has = h] ,canon ( ! ,n4 ,t4 ,! ,o4 ,t4 0 ! result ( criticism 9 ! wide/ s5se ( t ^w4 ,b :at ! *ur* ?us once a*iev$1 ! *ur* may at any "t revise40 ,we res]ve to a po9t some:at lat] ! pro( ( ! cr$ibility & ! inspiration ( ! ,scriptures4 ,we n[ %[ _! g5u95ess1 z we w\ld %[ ! g5u95ess ( o!r religi\s books1 l ! ,koran1 or ( secul> docum5ts1 l ,cic]o's ,orations aga9/ ,catil9e4 ,g5u95ess1 9 ! s5se 9 :i* we use ! t]m1 does n necess>ily imply au!nticity 7i4 e41 tru?fulness & au?ority72 see ,blunt1 ,dict4 ,doct4 & ,hi/4 ,!ol41 art43 ,au!nticity4 ,docum5ts may be g5u9e :i* are writt5 9 :ole or 9 "p by p]sons o!r ?an !y ^: names !y be>1 provid$ ^! p]sons belong to ! same class4 ,! ,epi/le to ! ,hebrews1 ?\gh n writt5 by ,paul1 is g5u9e1 because x proce$s f "o ( ! apo/olic class4 ,! addition ( ,deut4 #cd1 aft] ,moses' dea?1 does n invalidate ! g5u95ess ( ! ,p5tateu*2 nor w\ld ! !ory ( a lat] ,isaiah1 ev5 if x 7 e/abli%$1 disprove ! g5u95ess ( t prophecy2 provid$1 9 bo? cases1 t ! additions 7 made by m5 ( ! prophetic class4 ,on ! g5]al subject ( ! g5u95ess ( ! ,scripture docum5ts1 see ,alex&]1 ,mc,ilvaine1 ,*alm]s1 ,dodge1 & ,peabody1 on ! ,evid5ces ( ,*ri/ianity2 also ,ar*ibald1 ,! ,bible ,v]ifi$4 #a4 ,g5u95ess ( ! ,books ( ! ,new ,te/am5t4 ,we d n ne$ to adduce pro( ( ! exi/5ce ( ! books ( ! ,new ,te/am5t z f> back z ! ?ird c5tury1 = we possess manuscripts ( !m :i* are at lea/ f\rte5 hundr$ ye>s old1 &1 s9ce ! ?ird c5tury1 ref]5ces to !m h be5 inwov5 into all hi/ory & lit]ature4 ,we beg9 our pro(1 !re=e1 by %[+ t ^! docum5ts n only exi/$1 b 7 g5]ally accept$ z g5u9e1 be=e ! close ( ! second c5tury4 ,orig5 0 born z e>ly z #ahf ,a4 ,d42 yet ,tregelles tells u t ,orig5's works conta9 citations embrac+ two-?irds ( ! ,new ,te/am5t4 ,hat*1 ,hibb]t ,lectures1 #ab--8,! e>ly ye>s ( ,*ri/ianity 7 9 "s respects l ! e>ly ye>s ( our lives4444 ,^? e>ly ye>s are ! mo/ important 9 our education4 ,we le>n !n1 we h>dly "k h[1 ?r\gh ef=t & /ruggle & innoc5t mi/akes1 to use our eyes & e>s1 to measure di/ance & direction1 by a process :i* asc5ds by unconsci\s /eps to ! c]ta9ty :i* we feel 9 our maturity4444 ,x 0 9 "s su* unconsci\s way t ! ,*ri/ian ?\ght ( ! e>ly c5turies gradually acquir$ ! =m :i* we f9d :5 x em]ges z x 7 into ! develop$ manhood ( ! f\r? c5tury40 ,a4 ,all ! books ( ! ,new ,te/am5t1 ) ! s+le exception ( #b ,pet]1 7 n only receiv$ z g5u9e1 b 7 us$ 9 m or less collect$ =m1 9 ! latt] half ( ! second c5tury4 ,^! collections ( writ+s1 s sl[ly transcrib$ & di/ribut$1 imply ! long cont9u$ previ\s exi/5ce ( ! sep>ate books1 & =bid u to fix _! orig9 lat] ?an ! fir/ half ( ! second c5tury4 7a7 ,t]tullian 7#afj-bcj7 appeals to ! 8,new ,te/am5t0 z made up ( ! 8,gospels0 & 8,apo/les40 ,he v\*es = ! g5u95ess ( ! f\r gospels1 ! ,acts1 #a ,pet]1 #a ,john1 ?irte5 epi/les ( ,paul1 & ! ,apocalypse2 9 %ort1 to tw5ty-"o ( ! tw5ty-sev5 books ( our ,canon4 ,s&ay1 ,bampton ,lectures = #ahic1 is confid5t t ! fir/ ?ree gospels took _! pres5t %ape be=e ! de/ruction ( ,j]usalem4 ,yet he ?9ks ! fir/ & ?ird gospels ( composite orig91 & probably ! second4 ,n lat] ?an #abe ,a4 ,d4 ! f\r gospels ( our ,canon _h ga9$ a recogniz$ & exceptional au?ority4 ,&ov] ,pr(essors1 ,div9ity ( ,jesus ,*ri/1 #dj--8,! olde/ ( our gospels 0 writt5 ab\t ! ye> #gj4 ,! e>li] "o1 n[ lo/1 a great "p ( :i* is pres]v$ 9 ,luke & ,mat!w1 0 probably writt5 a few ye>s e>li]40 7b7 ,! ,muratorian ,canon 9 ! ,we/ & ! ,pe%ito ,v]sion 9 ! ,ea/ 7hav+ a common date ( ab\t #afj7 9 _! catalogues ( ! ,new ,te/am5t writ+s mutually complem5t ea* o!r's slight defici5cies1 & toge!r witness to ! fact t at t "t e book ( our pres5t ,new ,te/am5t1 ) ! exception ( #b ,pet]1 0 receiv$ z g5u9e4 ,hovey1 ,manual ( ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #ej--8,! fragm5t on ! ,canon1 discov]$ by ,muratori 9 #agch1 0 probably writt5 ab\t #agj ,a4 ,d41 9 ,greek4 ,x beg9s ) ! la/ words ( a s5t5ce :i* mu/ h ref]r$ to ! ,gospel ( ,m>k1 & proce$s to speak ( ! ,?ird ,gospel z writt5 by ,luke ! physician1 :o did n see ! ,"l1 & !n ( ! ,f\r? ,gospel z writt5 by ,john1 a disciple ( ! ,"l1 at ! reque/ ( 8 fell[ disciples & 8 eld]s40 ,bacon1 ,n4 ,t4 ,introduction1 #ej1 gives ! ,muratorian ,canon 9 full2 #cj--8,!ophilus ( ,antio* 7#aha-aij7 is ! fir/ to cite a gospel by "n1 quot+ ,john #a3a z f #8,john1 "o ( ^? :o 7 vessels ( ! ,_s4' 0 ,on ! ,muratorian ,canon1 see ,tregelles1 ,muratorian ,canon4 ,on ! ,pe%ito ,v]sion1 see ,s*aff1 ,introd4 to ,rev4 ,gk4-,eng4 ,n4 ,t41 xxxvii2 ,smi?'s ,bible ,dict41 pp4 #cchh1 #cchi4 7c7 ,! ,canon ( ,m>cion 7#adj71 ?\gh reject+ all ! gospels b t ( ,luke1 & all ! epi/les b t5 ( ,paul's1 %[s1 nev]!less1 t at t e>ly day 8apo/olic writ+s 7 reg>d$ z a complete orig9al rule ( doctr9e40 ,ev5 ,m>cion1 moreov]1 does n d5y ! g5u95ess ( ^? writ+s :i* = doctr9al reasons he rejects4 ,m>cion1 ! ,gno/ic1 0 ! enemy ( all ,judaism1 & reg>d$ ! ,god ( ! ,o4 ,t4 z a re/rict$ div9ity1 entirely diff]5t f ! ,god ( ! ,n4 ,t4 ,m>cion 0 8ipso ,paulo paul9ior0--8plus loyal que le roi40 ,he held t ,*ri/ianity 0 some?+ entirely new1 & t x /ood 9 opposition to all t w5t be=e x4 ,8 ,canon consi/$ ( two p>ts3 ! 8,gospel0 7,luke1 ) its text curtail$ by omission ( ! ,hebrai/ic elem5ts7 & ! ,apo/olicon 7! epi/les ( ,paul74 ,! epi/le to ,diognetus by an unkn[n au?or1 & ! epi/le ( ,b>nabas1 %>$ ! view ( ,m>cion4 ,! "n ( ! ,deity 0 *ang$ f ,jehovah to ,fa!r1 ,son1 & ,holy ,gho/4 ,if ,m>cion's view _h prevail$1 ! ,old ,te/am5t w\ld h be5 lo/ to ! ,*ri/ian ,*ur*4 ,god's revelation w\ld h be5 depriv$ ( its pro( f prophecy4 ,developm5t f ! pa/1 & div9e conduct ( ,jewi% hi/ory1 w\ld h be5 d5i$4 ,b )\t ! ,old ,te/am5t1 z ,h4 ,w4 ,bee*] ma9ta9$1 ! ,new ,te/am5t w\ld lack backgr\nd2 our *ief s\rce ( k ) reg>d to ,god's natural attributes ( p[]1 wisdom1 & tru? w\ld be remov$3 ! love & m]cy reveal$ 9 ! ,new ,te/am5t w\ld seem *>act]i/ics ( a weak be+1 :o c\ld n en=ce law or inspire respect4 ,a tree has z mu* bread? bel[ gr\nd z !re is above2 s ! ,o4 ,t4 roots ( ,god's revelation are z ext5sive & necess>y z are its ,n4 ,t4 trunk & bran*es & leaves4 ,see ,all51 ,religi\s ,progress1 #ha2 ,we/cott1 ,hi/4 ,n4 ,t4 ,canon1 & art43 ,canon1 9 ,smi?'s ,bible ,diction>y4 ,also ,reuss1 ,hi/ory ( ,canon2 ,mit*ell1 ,critical ,h&book1 "p ,i4 ,b4 ,! ,*ri/ian & ,apo/olic ,fa!rs :o liv$ 9 ! fir/ half ( ! second c5tury n only quote f ^! books & allude to !m1 b te/ify t !y 7 writt5 by ! apo/les !mselves4 ,we are !re=e compell$ to ref] _! orig9 /ill fur!r back1 namely1 to ! fir/ c5tury1 :5 ! apo/les liv$4 7a7 ,ir5u 7#abj-bjj7 m5tions & quotes ! f\r gospels by "n1 & among !m ! gospel accord+ to ,john3 8,aft]w>ds ,john1 ! disciple ( ! ,"l1 :o also lean$ ^u 8 brea/1 he likewise publi%$ a gospel1 :ile he dwelt 9 ,ephesus 9 ,asia40 ,& ,ir5u 0 ! disciple & fri5d ( ,polyc>p 7#hj-aff71 :o 0 himself a p]sonal acqua9tance ( ! ,apo/le ,john4 ,! te/imony ( ,ir5u is virtually ! evid5ce ( ,polyc>p1 ! contempor>y & fri5d ( ! ,apo/le1 t ea* ( ! gospels 0 writt5 by ! p]son ^: "n x be>s4 ,to ?is te/imony x is object$ t ,ir5u says !re are f\r gospels because !re are f\r qu>t]s ( ! _w & f\r liv+ creatures 9 ! *]ubim4 ,b we reply t ,ir5u is "h /at+1 n 8 own reason = accept+ f\r & only f\r gospels1 b :at he conceives to be ,god's reason = orda9+ t !re %\ld be f\r4 ,we are n w>rant$ 9 suppos+ t he accept$ ! f\r gospels on any o!r gr\nd ?an t ( te/imony t !y 7 ! productions ( apo/olic m54 ,*ryso/om1 9 a simil> mann]1 comp>es ! f\r gospels to a *>iot & f\r3 ,:5 ! ,k+ ( ,glory rides =? 9 x1 he %all receive ! triumphal acclamations ( all peoples4 ,s ,j]ome3 ,god rides ^u ! *]ubim1 & s9ce !re are f\r *]ubim1 !re mu/ be f\r gospels4 ,all ?is h[ev] is an e>ly attempt at ! philosophy ( religion1 & n an attempt to demon/rate hi/orical fact4 ,l4 ,l4 ,pa9e1 ,evolution ( ,tr9it>ianism1 #cai-cfg1 pres5ts ! radical view ( ! au?or%ip ( ! f\r? gospel4 ,he holds t ,john ! apo/le di$ ,a4 ,d4 #gj1 or soon aft]1 & t ,ir5u conf\nd$ ! two ,johns :om ,papias s cle>ly di/+ui%$--,john ! ,apo/le & ,john ! ,eld]4 ,) ,h>nack1 ,pa9e supposes ! gospel to h be5 writt5 by ,john ! ,eld]1 a contempor>y ( ,papias4 ,b we reply t ! te/imony ( ,ir5u implies a long cont9u$ previ\s tradition4 ,r4 ,w4 ,dale1 ,liv+ ,*ri/ & ,f\r ,gospels1 #ade--8,religi\s v5]ation su* z t ) :i* ,ir5u reg>d$ ^! books is ( sl[ gr[?4 ,!y mu/ h held a great place 9 ! ,*ur* z f> back z ! memory ( liv+ m5 ext5d$40 ,see ,ha/+s' ,bible ,diction>y1 #b3fie4 7b7 ,ju/9 ,m>tyr 7di$ #adh7 speaks ( 8memoirs 77 ( ,jesus ,*ri/10 & 8 quotations1 ?\gh sometimes made f memory1 are evid5tly cit$ f our gospels4 ,to ?is te/imony x is object$3 7#a7 ,t ,ju/9 ,m>tyr uses ! t]m 8memoirs0 in/ead ( 8gospels40 ,we reply t he else:]e uses ! t]m 8gospels0 & id5tifies ! 8memoirs0 ) !m3 ,apol41 #a3ff--8,! apo/les1 9 ! memoirs compos$ by !m1 :i* are call$ gospels10 i4 e41 n memoirs1 b gospels1 0 ! prop] title ( 8 writt5 records4 ,9 writ+ 8 ,apology to ! hea!n ,emp]ors1 ,m>cus ,aurelius & ,m>cus ,anton9us1 he *ooses ! t]m 8memoirs01 or 8memorabilia01 :i* ,x5ophon _h us$ z ! title ( 8 acc\nt ( ,socrates1 simply 9 ord] t he may avoid ecclesia/ical expressions unfamili> to 8 read]s & may comm5d 8 writ+ to lov]s ( classical lit]ature4 ,notice t ,mat!w mu/ be add$ to ,john1 to ju/ify ,ju/9's repeat$ /atem5t t !re 7 8memoirs0 ( our ,"l 8writt5 by apo/les10 & t ,m>k & ,luke mu/ be add$ to ju/ify 8 fur!r /atem5t t ^! memoirs 7 compil$ by 88 apo/les & ^? :o foll[$ !m40 ,analog\s to ,ju/9's use ( ! ^w 8memoirs0 is 8 use ( ! t]m 8,sunday01 in/ead ( ,sabba?3 ,apol4 #a3fg--8,on ! day call$ ,sunday1 all :o live 9 cities or 9 ! c\ntry ga!r toge!r to "o place1 & ! memoirs ( ! apo/les or ! writ+s ( ! prophets are read40 ,"h is ! use ( our gospels 9 public wor%ip1 z ( equal au?ority ) ! ,o4 ,t4 ,scriptures2 9 fact1 ,ju/9 con/antly quotes ! words & acts ( ,jesus' life f a writt5 s\rce1 us+ ! ^w 4 ,see ,morison1 ,com4 on ,mat41 ix2 ,hemphill1 ,lit]ature ( ,second ,c5tury1 #bcd4 ,to ,ju/9's te/imony x is object$3 7#b7 ,t 9 quot+ ! words spok5 f heav5 at ! ,savior's baptism1 he makes !m to be3 8,my son1 ?is day h ,i begott5 !e10 s quot+ ,psalm #b3g1 & %[+ t he 0 ignorant ( our pres5t gospel1 ,mat4 #c3ag4 ,we reply t ?is 0 probably a slip ( ! memory1 q natural 9 a day :5 ! gospels exi/$ only 9 ! cumbr\s =m ( manuscript rolls4 ,ju/9 also ref]s to ! ,p5tateu* = two facts :i* x does n conta92 b we %\ld n argue f ?is t he did n possess our pres5t ,p5tateu*4 ,! plays ( ,t]5ce are quot$ by ,cic]o & ,horace1 & we require nei!r m nor e>li] witnesses to _! g5u95ess1--yet ,cic]o & ,horace wrote a hundr$ ye>s aft] ,t]5ce4 ,x is unfair to refuse simil> evid5ce to ! gospels4 ,ju/9 _h a way ( comb9+ into "o ! say+s ( ! diff]5t evangeli/s--a h9t :i* ,tatian1 8 pupil1 probably foll[$ out 9 compos+ 8 ,diatess>on4 ,on ,ju/9 ,m>tyr's te/imony1 see ,ezra ,abbot1 ,g5u95ess ( ! ,f\r? ,gospel1 #di1 note4 ,b4 ,w4 ,bacon1 ,introd4 to ,n4 ,t41 speaks ( ,ju/9 z 8writ+ circa #aee ,a4 ,d40 7c7 ,papias 7#hj-afd71 :om ,ir5u calls a 8he>] ( ,john10 te/ifies t ,mat!w 8wrote 9 ! ,hebrew dialect ! sacr$ oracles 7 710 & t 8,m>k1 ! int]pret] ( ,pet]1 wrote aft] ,pet]1 7 7 or "u ,pet]'s direction1 an unsy/ematic acc\nt 7 70 ( ! same ev5ts & disc\rses4 ,to ?is te/imony x is object$3 7#a7 ,t ,papias c\ld n h _h our gospel ( ,mat!w1 = ! reason t ?is is ,greek4 ,we reply1 ei!r ) ,bleek1 t ,papias errone\sly suppos$ a ,hebrew translation ( ,mat!w1 :i* he possess$1 to be ! orig9al2 or ) ,weiss1 t ! orig9al ,mat!w 0 9 ,hebrew1 :ile our pres5t ,mat!w is an enl>g$ v]sion ( ! same4 ,pale/9e1 l mod]n ,wales1 0 bil+ual2 ,mat!w1 l ,james1 might write bo? ,hebrew & ,greek4 ,:ile ,b4 ,w4 ,bacon gives to ! writ+ ( ,papias a date s late z #ade-afj ,a4 ,d41 ,lightfoot gives t ( #acj ,a4 ,d4 ,at ?is latt] date ,papias c\ld easily rememb] /ories told him s f> back z #hj ,a4 ,d41 by m5 :o 7 y\?s at ! "t :5 our ,"l liv$1 di$1 rose & asc5d$4 ,! "w ( ,papias _h = its title --8,exposition ( ,oracles relat+ to ! ,"l0 ,comm5t>ies on ! ,gospels4 ,two ( ^! gospels 7 ,mat!w & ,m>k4 ,! view ( ,weiss m5tion$ above has be5 criticiz$ ^u ! gr\nd t ! quotations f ! ,o4 ,t4 9 ,jesus' disc\rses 9 ,mat!w are all tak5 f ! ,septuag9t & n f ! ,hebrew4 ,we/cott answ]s ?is criticism by sugge/+ t1 9 translat+ 8 ,hebrew gospel into ,greek1 ,mat!w sub/itut$ = 8 own oral v]sion ( ,*ri/'s disc\rses ! v]sion ( ^! already exi/+ 9 ! oral common gospel4 ,!re 0 a common oral basis ( true tea*+1 ! 8deposit0-- --committ$ to ,timo?y 7#a ,tim4 #f3bj2 #b ,tim4 #a3ab1 #ad71 ! same /ory told _m times & gett+ to be told 9 ! same way4 ,! n>ratives ( ,mat!w1 ,m>k & ,luke are indep5d5t v]sions ( ?is apo/olic te/imony4 ,fir/ came belief2 secondly1 oral tea*+2 ?irdly1 writt5 gospels4 ,t ! orig9al gospel 0 9 ,aramaic seems probable f ! fact t ! ,ori5tal "n = 8t>es10 zawn1 7,mat4 #ac3be7 has be5 translit]at$ into ,greek1 4 ,morison1 ,com4 on ,mat41 ?9ks t ,mat!w orig9ally wrote 9 ,hebrew a collection ( ,say+s ( ,jesus ,*ri/1 :i* ! ,naz>5es & ,ebionites add$ to1 p>tly f tradition1 & p>tly f translat+ 8 full gospel1 till ! result 0 ! s-call$ ,gospel ( ! ,hebrews2 b t ,mat!w wrote 8 own gospel 9 ,greek aft] he _h writt5 ! ,say+s 9 ,hebrew4 ,pr(essor ,w4 ,a4 ,/ev5s ?9ks t ,papias probably allud$ to ! orig9al autograph :i* ,mat!w wrote 9 ,aramaic1 b :i* he aft]w>ds enl>g$ & translat$ into ,greek4 ,see ,hemphill1 ,lit]ature ( ! ,second ,c5tury1 #bfg4 ,to ! te/imony ( ,papias x is also object$3 7#b7 ,t ,m>k is ! mo/ sy/ematic ( all evangeli/s1 pres5t+ ev5ts z a true annali/1 9 *ronological ord]4 ,we reply t :ile1 s f> z *ronological ord] is conc]n$1 ,m>k is sy/ematic1 s f> z logical ord] is conc]n$ he is ! mo/ unsy/ematic ( ! evangeli/s1 %[+ little ( ! p[] ( hi/orical gr\p+ :i* is s disc]nible 9 ,mat!w4 ,mat!w aim$ to portray a life1 r ?an to record a *ronology4 ,he gr\ps ,jesus' tea*+s 9 *apt]s #e1 #f1 & #g2 8 miracles 9 *apt]s #h & #i2 8 directions to ! apo/les 9 *apt] #aj2 *apt]s #aa & #ab describe ! gr[+ opposition2 *apt] #ac meets ?is opposition ) 8 p>ables2 ! rema9d] ( ! gospel describes our ,"l's prep>ation = 8 dea?1 8 progress to ,j]usalem1 ! consummation ( 8 "w 9 ! ,cross & 9 ! resurrection4 ,"h is true sy/em1 a philosophical arrangem5t ( mat]ial1 comp>$ ) :i* ! me?od ( ,m>k is em95tly unsy/ematic4 ,m>k is a ,froiss>t1 :ile ,mat!w has ! _s ( ,j4 ,r4 ,gre54 ,see ,bleek1 ,introd4 to ,n4 ,t41 #a3ajh1 #abf2 ,weiss1 ,life ( ,jesus1 #a3bg-ci4 7d7 ,! ,apo/olic ,fa!rs1--,clem5t ( ,rome 7di$ #aja71 ,ignatius ( ,antio* 7m>tyr$ #aae71 & ,polyc>p 7#hj-aff71--;companions & fri5ds ( ! apo/les1 h left u 9 _! writ+s ov] "o hundr$ quotations f or allusions to ! ,new ,te/am5t writ+s1 & among ^! e book1 except f\r m9or epi/les 7#b ,pet]1 ,jude1 #b & #c ,john7 is repres5t$4 ,al?\gh ^! are s+le te/imonies1 we mu/ rememb] t !y are ! te/imonies ( ! *ief m5 ( ! *ur*es ( _! day1 & t !y express ! op9ion ( ! *ur*es !mselves4 8,l bann]s ( a hidd5 army1 or peaks ( a di/ant m\nta9 range1 !y repres5t & are su/a9$ by compact1 cont9u\s bodies bel[40 ,9 an article by ,p4 ,w4 ,calk9s1 ,mc,clintock & ,/rong's ,encyclopdia1 #a3cae-cag1 quotations f ! ,apo/olic ,fa!rs 9 great numb]s are put side by side ) ! ,new ,te/am5t passages f :i* !y quote or to :i* !y allude4 ,an exam9ation ( ^! quotations & allusions conv9ces u t ^! ,fa!rs 7 9 possession ( all ! pr9cipal books ( our ,new ,te/am5t4 ,see ,ante-,nic5e ,libr>y ( ,t4 & ,t4 ,cl>k2 ,?ay]1 9 ,bo/on ,lectures = #ahga3cbd2 ,na%1 ,e?ics & ,revelation1 #aa--8;,ignatius says to ,polyc>p3 #8,! times call = !e1 z ! w9ds call = ! pilot4' ,s d ! times call = rev]5t1 fe>less s*ol>%ip 9 ! *ur*40 ,su* s*ol>%ip1 we are p]suad$1 has already demon/rat$ ! g5u95ess ( ! ,n4 ,t4 docum5ts4 7e7 ,9 ! synoptic gospels1 ! omission ( all m5tion ( ! fulfilm5t ( ,*ri/'s prophecies ) reg>d to ! de/ruction ( ,j]usalem is evid5ce t ^! gospels 7 writt5 be=e ! occurr5ce ( t ev5t4 ,9 ! ,acts ( ! ,apo/les1 univ]sally attribut$ to ,luke1 we h an allusion to 8! =m] treatise01 or ! gospel by ! same au?or1 :i* mu/1 !re=e1 h be5 writt5 be=e ! end ( ,paul's fir/ imprisonm5t at ,rome1 & probably ) ! help & sanction ( t apo/le4 ,acts #a3a--8,! =m] treatise ,i made1 ,o ,!ophilus1 conc]n+ all t ,jesus began bo? to d & to tea*40 ,if ! ,acts 0 writt5 ,a4 ,d4 #fc1 two ye>s aft] ,paul's arrival at ,rome1 !n 8! =m] treatise10 ! gospel accord+ to ,luke1 c h>dly be dat$ lat] ?an #fj2 & s9ce ! de/ruction ( ,j]usalem took place 9 #gj1 ,mat!w & ,m>k mu/ h publi%$ _! gospels at lea/ z e>ly z ! ye> #fh1 :5 multitudes ( m5 7 /ill liv+ :o _h be5 eye-witnesses ( ! ev5ts ( ,jesus' life4 ,fi%]1 ,nature & ,me?od ( ,revelation1 #ahj--8;,at any consid]ably lat] date ?an ! capture ( ,j]usalem ! app>5t conjunction ( ! fall ( ! city & ! temple ) ! ,p>\sia w\ld h be5 avoid$ or expla9$4444 ,mat!w1 9 its pres5t =m1 appe>$ aft] ! beg9n+ ( ! mortal /ruggle ( ! ,romans ) ! ,jews1 or betwe5 #fe & #gj4 ,m>k's gospel 0 /ill e>li]4 ,! language ( ! passages relative to ! ,p>\sia1 9 ,luke1 is consi/5t ) ! supposition t he wrote aft] ! fall ( ,j]usalem1 b n ) ! supposition t x 0 long aft]40 ,see ,norton1 ,g5u95ess ( ! ,gospels2 ,al=d1 ,greek ,te/am5t1 ,prolegom5a1 #cj1 #ca1 #cf1 #de-dg4 ,c4 ,x is to be presum$ t ?is acceptance ( ! ,new ,te/am5t docum5ts z g5u9e1 on ! "p ( ! ,fa!rs ( ! *ur*es1 0 = good & suffici5t reasons1 bo? int]nal & ext]nal1 & ?is presumption is corroborat$ by ! foll[+ consid]ations3 7a7 ,!re is evid5ce t ! e>ly *ur*es took e c>e to assure !mselves ( ! g5u95ess ( ^! writ+s be=e !y accept$ !m4 ,evid5ces ( c>e are ! foll[+3--,paul1 9 #b ,!ss4 #b3b1 urg$ ! *ur*es to use c>e1 8to ! end t ye be n quickly %ak5 f y\r m9d1 nor yet be tr\bl$1 ei!r by _s1 or by ^w1 or by epi/le z f u02 #a ,cor4 #e3i--8;,i wrote unto y 9 my epi/le to h no company ) =nicators02 ,col4 #d3af--8:5 ?is epi/le ha? be5 read among y1 cause t x be read also 9 ! *ur* ( ! ,laodiceans2 & t ye also read ! epi/le f ,laodicea40 ,melito 7#afi71 ,bi%op ( ,s>dis1 :o wrote a treatise on ! ,revelation ( ,john1 w5t z f> z ,pale/9e to asc]ta9 on ! spot ! facts relat+ to ! ,canon ( ! ,o4 ,t41 & z a result ( 8 inve/igations exclud$ ! ,apocrypha4 ,ryle1 ,canon ( ,o4 ,t41 #bjc--8,melito1 ! ,bi%op ( ,s>dis1 s5t to a fri5d a li/ ( ! ,o4 ,t4 ,scriptures :i* he pr(ess$ to h obta9$ f accurate inquiry1 :ile travel+ 9 ! ,ea/1 9 ,syria4 ,its cont5ts agree ) ^? ( ! ,hebrew ,canon1 save 9 ! omission ( ,e/h]40 ,s]apion1 ,bi%op ( ,antio* 7#aia-bac1 ,abbot71 says3 8,we receive ,pet] & o!r apo/les z ,*ri/1 b z skilful m5 we reject ^? writ+s :i* are falsely ascrib$ to !m40 ,geo4 ,h4 ,f]ris1 ,bapti/ ,congress1 #ahii3id--8,s]apion1 aft] p]mitt+ ! read+ ( ! ,gospel ( ,pet] 9 public s]vices1 f9ally decid$ aga9/ x1 n because he ?\ght !re c\ld be no fif? gospel1 b because he ?\ght x 0 n writt5 by ,pet]40 ,t]tullian 7#afj-bcj7 gives an example ( ! deposition ( a presbyt] 9 ,asia ,m9or = publi%+ a pret5d$ "w ( ,paul2 see ,t]tullian1 ,de ,baptismo1 ref]r$ to by ,godet on ,john1 ,introduction2 ,l>dn]1 ,works1 #b3cjd1 #cje2 ,mc,ilvaine1 ,evid5ces1 #ib4 7b7 ,! /yle ( ! ,new ,te/am5t writ+s1 & _! complete correspond5ce ) all we "k ( ! l&s & times 9 :i* !y pr(ess to h be5 writt51 af=ds conv9c+ pro( t !y belong to ! apo/olic age4 ,notice ! m+l+ ( ,lat9 & ,greek1 z 9 7,m>k #f3bg7 & 7,m>k #ae3ci72 ( ,greek & ,araman1 z 9 7,m>k #f3dj7 & 7,mat4 #bd3ae72 ?is c\ld h>dly h occurr$ aft] ! fir/ c5tury4 ,comp>e ! ana*ronisms ( /yle & description 9 ,?ack]ay's 8,h5ry ,esmond10 :i*1 9 spite ( ! au?or's special /udies & 8 det]m9ation to exclude all words & phrases t _h orig9at$ 9 8 own c5tury1 0 m>r$ by hi/orical errors t ,macaulay 9 8 mo/ remiss mom5ts w\ld h>dly h made4 ,james ,russell ,l[ell told ,?ack]ay t 8diff]5t to0 0 n a c5tury old4 8,hang x1 no60 repli$ ,?ack]ay4 ,9 view ( ?is failure1 on ! "p ( an au?or ( great lit]>y skill1 to con/ruct a /ory purport+ to be writt5 a c5tury be=e 8 "t & t c\ld /& ! te/ ( hi/orical criticism1 we may well reg>d ! success ( our gospels 9 /&+ su* te/s z a practical demon/ration t !y 7 writt5 91 & n aft]1 ! apo/olic age4 ,see ,alex&]1 ,*ri/ & ,*ri/ianity1 #bg-cg2 ,blunt1 ,scriptural ,co9cid5ces1 #bdd-ced4 7c7 ,! g5u95ess ( ! f\r? gospel is confirm$ by ! fact t ,tatian 7#aee-agj71 ! ,assyrian1 a disciple ( ,ju/91 repeat$ly quot$ x )\t nam+ ! au?or1 & compos$ a ,h>mony ( our f\r gospels :i* he nam$ ! ,diatess>on2 :ile ,basilides 7#acj7 & ,val5t9us 7#aej71 ! ,gno/ics1 bo? quote f x4 ,! sceptical "w entitl$ 8,sup]natural ,religion0 said 9 #ahgd2 8,no "o seems to h se5 ,tatian's ,h>mony1 probably = ! v simple reason t !re 0 no su* "w02 & 8,!re is no evid5ce :atev] connect+ ,tatian's ,gospel ) ^? ( our ,canon40 ,9 #ahgf1 h[ev]1 !re 0 publi%$ 9 a ,lat9 =m 9 ,v5ice ! ,comm5t>y ( ,ephraem ,syrus on ,tatian1 & ! comm5cem5t ( x 03 8,9 ! beg9n+ 0 ! ,^w0 7,john #a3a74 ,9 #ahhh1 ! ,diatess>on itself 0 publi%$ 9 ,rome 9 ! =m ( an ,arabic translation made 9 ! elev5? c5tury f ! ,syriac4 ,j4 ,r5del ,h>ris1 9 ,contemp4 ,rev41 #ahic3hjj sq41 says t ! recov]y ( ,tatian's ,diatess>on has indef9itely po/pon$ ! lit]>y fun]al ( ,/4 ,john4 ,advanc$ critics1 he intimates1 are s call$1 because !y run ahead ( ! facts !y discuss4 ,! gospels mu/ h be5 well e/abli%$ 9 ! ,*ri/ian *ur* :5 ,tatian und]took to comb9e !m4 ,mrs4 ,a4 ,s4 ,lewis1 9 ,s4 ,s4 ,times1 ,jan4 #bc1 #aijd--8,! gospels 7 translat$ into ,syriac be=e ,a4 ,d4 #afj4 ,x foll[s t ! ,greek docum5t f :i* !y 7 translat$ 0 old] /ill1 & s9ce ! "o includes ! gospel ( ,/4 ,john1 s did ! o!r40 ,hemphill1 ,lit]ature ( ! ,second ,c5tury1 #ahc-bca1 gives ! bir? ( ,tatian ab\t #abj1 & ! date ( 8 ,diatess>on z #agb ,a4 ,d4 ,! diff]5ce 9 /yle betwe5 ! ,revelation & ! gospel ( ,john is due to ! fact t ! ,revelation 0 writt5 dur+ ,john's exile 9 ,patmos1 "u ,n]o1 9 #fg or #fh1 soon aft] ,john _h left ,pale/9e & _h tak5 up 8 resid5ce at ,ephesus4 ,he _h hi!rto spok5 ,araman1 & ,greek 0 comp>atively unfamili> to him4 ,! gospel 0 writt5 ?irty ye>s aft]1 probably ab\t #ig1 :5 ,greek _h become to him l a "m tongue4 ,see ,lightfoot on ,galatians1 #cdc1 #cdg2 p] contra1 see ,milligan1 ,revelation ( ,/4 ,john4 ,phrases & ideas :i* indicate a common au?or%ip ( ! ,revelation & ! gospel are ! foll[+3 8! ,lamb ( ,god10 8! ,^w ( ,god10 8! ,true0 z an epi!t appli$ to ,*ri/1 8! ,jews0 z enemies ( ,god1 8manna10 8him :om !y pi]c$02 see ,elliott1 ,hor ,apocalyptic1 #a3d1 #e4 ,9 ! f\r? gospel we h 1 9 ,apoc4 1 p]haps bett] to di/+ui% 8! ,lamb0 f ! dim9utive 1 8! bea/40 ,common to bo? ,gospel & ,rev4 are 1 8to d0 ! tru?2 1 ( moral conduct2 1 8g5u9e02 1 1 ( ! high] wants ( ! s\l2 1 1 2 also 8ov]come10 8te/imony10 8,bridegroom10 8,%eph]d10 8,wat] ( life40 ,9 ! ,revelation !re are grammatical solecisms3 nom9ative = g5itive1 #a3d-- 2 nom9ative = accusative1 #g3i-- 444 2 accusative = nom9ative1 #bj3b-- 4 ,simil>ly we h 9 ,rom4 #ab3e-- in/ead ( 1 :]e has lo/ its regim5--a frequ5t solecism 9 lat] ,greek writ]s2 see ,godet on ,john1 #a3bfi1 #bgj4 ,em]son rem9d$ ,jones ,v t ! ,holy ,gho/ surely writes good gramm>4 ,! ,apocalypse seems to %[ t ,em]son 0 wrong4 ,! au?or ( ! f\r? gospel speaks ( ,john 9 ! ?ird p]son1 8& scorn$ to blot x ) a "n40 ,b s does ,cs> speak ( himself 9 8 ,comm5t>ies4 ,h>nack reg>ds bo? ! f\r? gospel & ! ,revelation z ! "w ( ,john ! ,presbyt] or ,eld]1 ! =m] writt5 n lat] ?an ab\t #aaj ,a4 ,d42 ! latt] f #ic to #if1 b be+ a revision ( "o or m und]ly+ ,jewi% apocalypses4 ,vis*] has exp\nd$ ?is view ( ! ,revelation2 & ,port] holds sub/antially ! same1 9 8 article on ! ,book ( ,revelation 9 ,ha/+s' ,bible ,diction>y1 #d3bci-bff4 8,x is ! obvi\s advantage ( ! ,vis*]-,h>nack hypo!sis t x places ! orig9al "w "u ,n]o & its revis$ & ,*ri/ianiz$ edition "u ,domitian40 7,s&ay1 ,inspiration1 #cga1 #cgb1 nev]!less dismisses ?is hypo!sis z rais+ worse difficulties ?an x removes4 ,he dates ! ,apocalypse betwe5 ! dea? ( ,n]o & ! de/ruction ( ,j]usalem by ,titus47 ,m>t9eau1 ,seat ( ,au?ority1 #bbg1 pres5ts ! moral objections to ! apo/olic au?or%ip1 & reg>ds ! ,revelation1 f *apt] #d3a to #bb3e1 z a purely ,jewi% docum5t ( ! date #ff-gj1 supplem5t$ & revis$ by a ,*ri/ian1 & issu$ n e>li] ?an #acf3 8,h[ /range t we %\ld ev] h ?\ght x possible = a p]sonal att5dant ^u ! m9i/ry ( ,jesus to write or edit a book mix+ up fi]ce ,messianic conflicts1 9 :i*1 ) ! sword1 ! gory g>m5t1 ! bla/+ flame1 ! rod ( iron1 z 8 emblems1 he leads ! w>-m>*1 & treads ! w9epress ( ! wra? ( ,god until ! deluge ( blood rises to ! horses' bits1 ) ! speculative ,*ri/ology ( ! second c5tury1 )\t a memory ( 8 life1 a feature ( 8 look1 a ^w f 8 voice1 or a glance back at ! hillsides ( ,galilee1 ! c\rts ( ,j]usalem1 ! road to ,be?any1 on :i* 8 image mu/ be =ev] se560 ,! =ce ( ?is /atem5t1 h[ev]1 is greatly brok5 if we consid] t ! apo/le ,john1 9 8 e>li] days1 0 "o ( ! 8,boan]ges1 :i* is1 ,sons ( ?und]0 7,m>k #c3ag71 b became 9 8 lat] ye>s ! apo/le ( love3 #a ,john #d3g--8;,belov$1 let u love "o ano!r1 = love is ( ,god40 ,! lik5ess ( ! f\r? gospel to ! epi/le1 :i* latt] 0 und\bt$ly ! "w ( ,john ! apo/le1 indicates ! same au?or%ip = ! gospel4 ,?ay] rem>ks t 8! discov]y ( ! gospel accord+ to ,pet] sweeps away half a c5tury ( discussion4 ,brief z is ! recov]$ fragm5t1 x atte/s indubitably all f\r ( our canonical books40 ,riddle1 9 ,popul> ,com41 #a3be--8;,if a =g] wrote ! f\r? gospel1 !n ,beelzebub has be5 ca/+ out devils = ^! eighte5 hundr$ ye>s40 ,on ! g5u95ess ( ! f\r? gospel1 see ,bleek1 ,introd4 to ,n4 ,t41 #a3bej2 ,fi%]1 ,essays on ,sup]nat4 ,orig9 ( ,*ri/ianity1 #cc1 also ,beg9n+s ( ,*ri/ianity1 #cbj-cfb1 & ,gr\nds ( ,!i/ic & ,*ri/ian ,belief1 #bde-cji2 ,s&ay1 ,au?or%ip ( ! ,f\r? ,gospel1 ,gospels 9 ! ,second ,c5tury1 & ,criticism ( ! ,f\r? ,gospel2 ,ezra ,abbott1 ,g5u95ess ( ! ,f\r? ,gospel1 #eb1 #hj-hg2 ,r[1 ,bampton ,lectures on ,*ri/ian ,evid5ces1 #bdi-bhg2 ,briti% ,qu>t]ly1 ,oct4 #ahgb3baf2 ,godet1 9 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #e3 no4 #be2 ,we/cott1 9 ,bib4 ,com4 on ,john's ,gospel1 ,introd41 xxviii-xxxii2 ,watk9s1 ,bampton ,lectures = #ahij2 ,w4 ,l4 ,f]guson1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahif3a-bg4 7d7 ,! epi/le to ! ,hebrews appe>s to h be5 accept$ dur+ ! fir/ c5tury aft] x 0 writt5 7s ,clem5t ( ,borne1 ,ju/9 ,m>tyr1 & ! ,pe%ito ,v]sion witness74 ,!n = two c5turies1 especially 9 ! ,roman & ,nor? ,african *ur*es1 & probably because its int]nal *>act]i/ics 7 inconsi/5t ) ! tradition ( a ,paul9e au?or%ip1 its g5u95ess 0 d\bt$ 7s ,t]tullian1 ,cyprian1 ,ir5u1 ,muratorian ,canon74 ,at ! end ( ! f\r? c5tury1 ,j]ome exam9$ ! evid5ce & decid$ 9 its favor2 ,augu/9e did ! same2 ! ?ird ,c\ncil ( ,c>?age =mally recogniz$ x 7#cig72 f t "t ! ,lat9 *ur*es unit$ ) ! ,ea/ 9 receiv+ x1 & ?us ! d\bt 0 f9ally & =ev] remov$4 ,! ,epi/le to ! ,hebrews1 ! /yle ( :i* is s unlike t ( ! ,apo/le ,paul1 0 possibly writt5 by ,apollos1 :o 0 an ,alex&rian ,jew1 8a le>n$ man0 & 8mighty 9 ! ,scriptures0 7,acts #ah3bd72 b x may not)/&+ h be5 writt5 at ! sugge/ion & "u ! direction ( ,paul1 & s be ess5tially ,paul9e4 ,a4 ,c4 ,k5drick1 9 ,am]ican ,comm5t>y on ,hebrews1 po9ts out t :ile ! /yle ( ,paul is prevail+ly dialectic1 & only 9 rapt mom5ts becomes rhetorical or poetic1 ! /yle ( ! ,epi/le to ! ,hebrews is prevail+ly rhetorical1 is free f anacolu?a1 & is always dom9at$ by emotion4 ,he holds t ^! *>act]i/ics po9t to ,apollos z its au?or4 ,contra/ also ,paul's me?od ( quot+ ! ,o4 ,t43 8x is writt50 7,rom4 #aa3h2 #a ,cor4 #a3ca2 ,gal4 #c3aj7 ) t ( ! ,hebrews3 8he sai?0 7#h3e1 #ac71 8he ha? said0 7#d3d74 ,paul quotes ! ,o4 ,t4 fifty or sixty times1 b nev] 9 ?is latt] way4 ,heb4 #b3c--8:i* hav+ at ! fir/ be5 spok5 by ! ,"l1 0 confirm$ unto u by !m t he>d0--%[s t ! writ] did n receive ! gospel at fir/ h&4 ,lu!r & ,calv9 rightly saw 9 ?is a decisive pro( t ,paul 0 n ! au?or1 = he always insi/$ on ! prim>y & indep5d5t "* ( 8 gospel4 ,h>nack =m]ly ?\ght ! epi/le writt5 by ,b>nabas to ,*ri/ians at ,rome1 ,a4 ,d4 #ha-if4 ,m rec5tly h[ev] he attributes x to ,priscilla1 ! wife ( ,aquila1 or to _! jo9t au?or%ip4 ,! maje/y ( its diction1 h[ev]1 seems unfavorable to ?is view4 ,william ,t4 ,c4 ,hanna3 8,! words ( ! au?or 444 are m>%all$ gr&ly1 & move ) ! tread ( an army1 or ) ! swell ( a tidal wave02 see ,frankl9 ,johnson1 ,quotations 9 ,n4 ,t4 f ,o4 ,t41 xii4 ,plumptre1 ,introd4 to ,n4 ,t41 #cg1 & 9 ,expositor1 ,vol4 ,i1 reg>ds ! au?or ( ?is epi/le z ! same ) t ( ! ,apocryphal ,wisdom ( ,solomon1 ! latt] be+ compos$ be=e1 ! =m] aft]1 ! writ]'s conv]sion to ,*ri/ianity4 ,p]haps our safe/ conclusion is t ( ,orig53 8,god only kn[s :o wrote x40 ,h>nack h[ev] rem>ks3 8,! "t 9 :i* our anci5t ,*ri/ian lit]ature1 ! ,n4 ,t4 includ$1 0 consid]$ z a web ( delusions & falsifications1 is pa/4 ,! olde/ lit]ature ( ! *ur* is1 9 its ma9 po9ts1 & 9 mo/ ( its details1 true & tru/wor?y40 ,see articles on ,hebrews1 9 ,smi?'s & 9 ,ha/+s' ,bible ,diction>ies4 7e7 ,z to #b ,pet]1 ,jude1 & #b & #c ,john1 ! epi/les mo/ frequ5tly held to be spuri\s1 we may say t1 al?\gh we h no conclusive ext]nal evid5ce e>li] ?an ,a4 ,d4 #afj1 & 9 ! case ( #b ,pet] none e>li] ?an ,a4 ,d4 #bcj-bej1 we may fairly urge 9 favor ( _! g5u95ess n only _! int]nal *>act]i/ics ( lit]>y /yle & moral value1 b also ! g5]al acceptance ( !m all s9ce ! ?ird c5tury z ! actual productions ( ! m5 or class ( m5 ^: names !y be>4 ,firmilianus 7#bej71 ,bi%op ( ,cs>ea 9 ,cappadocia1 is ! fir/ cle> witness to #b ,pet]4 ,orig5 7#bcj7 names x1 b1 9 nam+ x1 admits t its g5u95ess is que/ion$4 ,! ,c\ncil ( ,laodicea 7#cgb7 fir/ receiv$ x into ! ,canon4 ,) ?is v gradual recognition & acceptance ( #b ,pet]1 comp>e ! loss ( ! lat] works ( ,ari/otle = a hundr$ & fifty ye>s aft] 8 dea?1 & _! recognition z g5u9e s soon z !y 7 recov]$ f ! cell> ( ! family ( ,neleus 9 ,asia2 ,de ,wette's fir/ publication ( c]ta9 lett]s ( ,lu!r aft] ! lapse ( ?ree hundr$ ye>s1 yet )\t occasion+ d\bt z to _! g5u95ess2 or ! concealm5t ( ,milton's ,treatise on ,*ri/ian ,doctr9e1 among ! lumb] ( ! ,/ate ,pap] ,(fice 9 ,london1 f #afgg to #ahbc2 see ,mair1 ,*ri/ian ,evid5ces1 #ie4 ,sir ,william ,hamilton compla9$ t !re 7 treatises ( ,cudwor?1 ,b]keley & ,colli]1 /ill ly+ unpubli%$ & ev5 unkn[n to _! editors1 biograph]s & fell[ metaphysicians1 b yet ( ! highe/ int]e/ & importance2 see ,mansel1 ,lett]s1 ,lectures & ,reviews1 #cha2 ,ar*ibald1 ,! ,bible ,v]ifi$1 #bg4 #b ,pet] 0 probably s5t f ! ,ea/ %ortly be=e ,pet]'s m>tyrdom2 di/ance & p]secution may h prev5t$ its rapid circulation 9 o!r c\ntries4 ,sagebe]1 ,! ,bible 9 ,c\rt1 #aad--8;,a l$g] may h be5 lo/1 or its au!nticity = a long "t d\bt$1 b :5 once x is discov]$ & prov$1 x is z tru/wor?y z any o!r "p ( ! res ge/40 ,see ,plumptre1 ,epi/les ( ,pet]1 ,introd41 #gc-ha2 ,al=d on #b ,pet]1 #d3 ,prolegom5a1 #aeg2 ,we/cott1 on ,canon1 9 ,smi?'s ,bib4 ,dict41 #a3cgj1 #cgc2 ,blunt1 ,dict4 ,doct4 & ,hi/4 ,!ol41 art43 ,canon4 ,x is urg$ by ^? :o d\bt ! g5u95ess ( #b ,pet] t ! epi/le speaks ( 8y\r apo/les0 7#c3b71 j z ,jude #ag speaks ( 8! apo/les10 z if ! writ] did n numb] himself among !m4 ,b #b ,pet] beg9s ) 8,simon ,pet]1 a s]vant & apo/le ( ,jesus ,*ri/10 & ,jude1 8bro!r ( ,james0 7v]se #a7 0 a bro!r ( our ,"l1 b n an apo/le4 ,hovey1 ,introd4 to ,n4 ,t41 xxxi--8,! e>lie/ passage manife/ly bas$ ^u #b ,pet] appe>s to be 9 ! s-call$ ,second ,epi/le ( ! ,roman ,clem5t1 #af3c1 :i* h[ev] is n[ und]/ood to be a ,*ri/ian homily f ! middle ( ! second c5tury40 ,orig5 7born #ahf7 te/ifies t ,pet] left "o epi/le1 8& p]haps a second1 = t is disput$40 ,he also says3 8,john wrote ! ,apocalypse1 & an epi/le ( v few l9es2 &1 x may be1 a second & a ?ird2 s9ce all d n admit !m to be g5u9e40 ,he quotes also f ,james & f ,jude1 add+ t _! canonicity 0 d\bt$4 ,h>nack reg>ds #a ,pet]1 #b ,pet]1 ,james1 & ,jude1 z writt5 respectively ab\t #afj1 #agj1 #acj1 & #acj1 b n by ! m5 to :om !y are ascrib$--! ascriptions to ^! au?ors be+ lat] additions4 ,hort rem>ks3 8,if ,i 7 ask$1 ,i %\ld say t ! balance ( ! argum5t 0 aga9/ #b ,pet]1 b ! mom5t ,i _h done s ,i %\ld beg9 to ?9k ,i might be 9 ! wrong40 ,s&ay1 ,oracles ( ,god1 #gc note1 consid]s ! argum5ts 9 favor ( #b ,pet] unconv9c+1 b also ! argum5ts aga9/4 ,he _c get beyond a non liquet4 ,he ref]s to ,salmon1 ,introd4 to ,n4 ,t41 #ebi-eei1 ed4 #d1 z express+ 8 own view4 ,b ! lat] conclusions ( ,s&ay are m radical4 ,9 8 ,bampton ,lectures on ,inspiration1 #cdh1 #cii1 he says3 #b ,pet] 8is probably at lea/ to ?is ext5t a c\nt]feit1 t x appe>s "u a "n :i* is n t ( its true au?or40 ,*ase1 9 ,ha/+s' ,bib4 ,dict41 #c3hjf-hag1 says t 8! fir/ piece ( c]ta9 evid5ce z to #b ,pet] is ! passage f ,orig5 quot$ by ,eusebius1 ?\gh x h>dly admits ( d\bt t ! ,epi/le 0 kn[n to ,clem5t ( ,alex&ria4444 ,we f9d no trace ( ! epi/le 9 ! p]iod :5 ! tradition ( apo/olic days 0 /ill liv+4444 ,x 0 n ! "w ( ! apo/le b ( ! second c5tury 444 put =w>d )\t any s9i/] motive 444 ! p]sonation ( ! apo/le an obvi\s lit]>y device r ?an a religi\s or controv]sial fraud4 ,! adoption ( su* a v]dict c cause p]plexity only :5 ! ,"l's promise ( guidance to 8 ,*ur* is reg>d$ z a *>t] ( infallibility40 ,aga9/ ?is v]dict we w\ld urge ! dignity & spiritual value ( #b ,pet]--int]nal evid5ce :i* 9 our judgm5t causes ! balance to incl9e 9 favor ( its apo/olic au?or%ip4 7f7 ,^u no o!r hypo!sis ?an t ( _! g5u95ess c ! g5]al acceptance ( ^! f\r m9or epi/les s9ce ! ?ird c5tury1 & ( all ! o!r books ( ! ,new ,te/am5t s9ce ! middle ( ! second c5tury1 be satisfactorily acc\nt$ =4 ,if !y _h be5 m]e collections ( float+ leg5ds1 !y c\ld n h secur$ wide circulation z sacr$ books = :i* ,*ri/ians mu/ answ] ) _! blood4 ,if !y _h be5 =g]ies1 ! *ur*es at l>ge c\ld nei!r h be5 deceiv$ z to _! previ\s non-exi/5ce1 nor h be5 induc$ unanim\sly to pret5d t !y 7 anci5t & g5u9e4 ,inasmu*1 h[ev]1 z o!r acc\nts ( _! orig91 inconsi/5t ) _! g5u95ess1 are n[ curr5t1 we proce$ to exam9e m at l5g? ! mo/ important ( ^! oppos+ views4 ,! g5u95ess ( ! ,new ,te/am5t z a :ole w\ld /ill be demon/rable1 ev5 if d\bt %\ld /ill atta* to "o or two ( its books4 ,x does n matt] t #bnd ,alcibiades 0 n writt5 by ,plato1 or ,p]icles by ,%akespe>e4 ,! ,c\ncil ( ,c>?age 9 #cig gave a place 9 ! ,canon to ! ,o4 ,t4 ,apocrypha1 b ! ,re=m]s tore x out4 ,zw+li said ( ! ,revelation3 8,x is n a ,biblical book10 & ,lu!r spoke slight+ly ( ! ,epi/le ( ,james4 ,! judgm5t ( ,*ri/5dom at l>ge is m tru/wor?y ?an ! private impressions ( any s+le ,*ri/ian s*ol>4 ,to hold ! books ( ! ,n4 ,t4 to be writt5 9 ! second c5tury by o!r ?an ^? ^: names !y be> is to hold1 n simply to =g]y1 b to a conspiracy ( =g]y4 ,!re mu/ h be5 sev]al =g]s at "w1 &1 s9ce _! writ+s wond]fully agree1 !re mu/ h be5 collusion among !m4 ,yet ^! able m5 h be5 =gott51 :ile ! names ( f> feebl] writ]s ( ! second c5tury h be5 pres]v$4 ,g4 ,f4 ,wright1 ,sci5tific ,aspects ( ,*ri/ian ,evid5ces1 #cdc--8;,9 civil law !re are #8/atutes ( limitations' :i* provide t ! g5]al ackn[l$gm5t ( a purport$ fact = a c]ta9 p]iod %all be consid]$ z conclusive evid5ce ( x4 ,if1 = example1 a man has rema9$ 9 undi/urb$ possession ( l& = a c]ta9 numb] ( ye>s1 x is presum$ t he has a valid claim to x1 & no "o is all[$ to dispute 8 claim40 ,mair1 ,evid5ces1 #ii--8,we probably h n a t5? "p ( ! evid5ce ^u :i* ! e>ly *ur*es accept$ ! ,n4 ,t4 books z ! g5u9e productions ( _! au?ors4 ,we h only _! v]dict40 ,wynne1 9 ,lit]ature ( ! ,second ,c5tury1 #eh--8,^? :o gave up ! ,scriptures 7 look$ on by _! fell[ ,*ri/ians z #8traditores1' traitors1 :o _h basely yield$ up :at !y ought to h treasur$ z de>] ?an life4 ,b all _! books 7 n equally sacr$4 ,"s 7 ess5tial1 & "s 7 non-ess5tial to ! fai?4 ,h5ce arose ! di/9ction betwe5 canonical & non-canonical4 ,! g5]al consci\sness ( ,*ri/ians grew into a di/9ct regi/ration40 ,su* regi/ration is entitl$ to ! highe/ respect1 & lays ! burd5 ( pro( ^u ! objector4 ,see ,alex&]1 ,*ri/ & ,*ri/ianity1 ,introduction2 ,hovey1 ,g5]al ,introduction to ,am]ican ,comm5t>y on ,n4 ,t4 ,d4 ,rationali/ic ,!ories z to ! orig9 ( ! gospels4 ,^! are attempts to elim9ate ! miracul\s elem5t f ! ,new ,te/am5t records1 & to recon/ruct ! sacr$ hi/ory ^u pr9ciples ( naturalism4 ,aga9/ !m we urge ! g5]al objection t !y are unsci5tific 9 _! pr9ciple & me?od4 ,to set out 9 an exam9ation ( ! ,new ,te/am5t docum5ts ) ! assumption t all hi/ory is a m]e natural developm5t1 & t miracles are !re=e impossible1 is to make hi/ory a matt]1 n ( te/imony1 b ( a priori speculation4 ,x inde$ r5d]s any hi/ory ( ,*ri/ & 8 apo/les impossible1 s9ce ! witnesses ^: te/imony ) reg>d to miracles is discr$it$ c no long] be consid]$ wor?y ( cr$5ce 9 _! acc\nt ( ,*ri/'s life or doctr9e4 ,9 ,g]many1 half a c5tury ago1 8a man 0 fam\s accord+ z he _h lift$ up axes ^u ! ?ick trees0 7,ps4 #gd3e1 ,a4 ,v471 j z among ! ,am]ican ,indians he 0 n c\nt$ a man :o c\ld n %[ 8 scalps4 ,! critics =tunately scalp$ ea* o!r2 see ,tyl]1 ,!ology ( ,greek ,poets1 #gi--on ,hom]4 ,nicoll1 ,! ,*ur*'s ,"o ,f\ndation1 #ae--8,l ! mumm]s ( old1 sceptical critics s5d "o be=e !m ) a broom to sweep ! /age cle> ( ev]y?+ = _! drama4 ,if we assume at ! ?re%old ( ! gospel /udy t ev]y?+ ( ! nature ( miracle is impossible1 !n ! specific que/ions are decid$ be=e ! criticism beg9s to op]ate 9 e>ne/40 ,mat!w ,arnold3 8,our popul> religion at pres5t conceives ! bir?1 m9i/ry & dea? ( ,*ri/ z altoge!r /eep$ 9 prodigy1 brimful ( miracle1--& miracles d n happ540 ,?is presupposition influ5ces ! inve/igations ( ,ku551 & ( ,a4 ,e4 ,abbott1 9 8 article on ! ,gospels 9 ! ,encyc4 ,britannica4 ,we give special att5tion to f\r ( ! !ories bas$ ^u ?is assumption4 #a/4 ,! ,my?-!ory ( ,/rauss 7#ahjh-ahgd74 ,accord+ to ?is view1 ! gospels are cry/allizations into /ory ( ,messianic ideas :i* _h = sev]al g5]ations fill$ ! m9ds ( imag9ative m5 9 ,pale/9e4 ,! my? is a n>rative 9 :i* su* ideas are unconsci\sly clo!d1 & f :i* ! elem5t ( int5tional & delib]ate deception is abs5t4 ,?is e>ly view ( ,/rauss1 :i* has become id5tifi$ ) 8 "n1 0 ex*ang$ 9 late ye>s = a m advanc$ view :i* ext5d$ ! mean+ ( ! ^w 8my?s0 s z to include all n>ratives t spr+ out ( a !ological idea1 & x admitt$ ! exi/5ce ( 8pi\s frauds0 9 ! gospels4 ,baur1 he says1 fir/ conv9c$ him t ! au?or ( ! f\r? gospel _h 8n unfrequ5tly compos$ m]e fables1 kn[+ !m to be m]e fictions40 ,! animat+ _s ( bo? ! old view & ! new is ! same4 ,/rauss says3 8,we "k ) c]ta9ty :at ,jesus 0 n1 & :at he has n done1 namely1 no?+ sup]human & sup]natural40 8,no gospel c claim t degree ( hi/oric cr$ibility t w\ld be requir$ 9 ord] to make u debase our reason to ! po9t ( believ+ miracles40 ,he calls ! resurrection ( ,*ri/ 8e9 weltges*i*tli*] ,humbug40 8,if ! gospels are really hi/orical docum5ts1 we _c exclude miracle f ! life-/ory ( ,jesus20 see ,/rauss1 ,life ( ,jesus1 #ag2 ,new ,life ( ,jesus1 #a3 preface1 xii4 ,vatke1 ,e9leitung 9 ,a4 ,t41 #baj1 #baa1 di/+ui%es ! my? f ! saga or leg5d3 ,! crit]ion ( ! pure my? is t ! exp]i5ce is impossible1 :ile ! saga is a tradition ( remote antiquity2 ! my? has 9 x ! elem5t only ( belief1 ! saga has 9 x an elem5t ( hi/ory4 ,sabati]1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #cg--8;,a my? is false 9 appe>ance only4 ,! div9e ,_s c avail himself ( ! fictions ( poetry z well z ( logical reason+s4 ,:5 ! he>t 0 pure1 ! veils ( fable always all[$ ! face ( tru? to %9e ?r\gh4 ,& does n *ildhood run on into maturity & old age80 ,x is v c]ta9 t *ildlike love ( tru? 0 n ! animat+ _s ( ,/rauss4 ,on ! contr>y1 8 _s 0 t ( remorseless criticism & ( uncompromis+ ho/ility to ! sup]natural4 ,x has be5 well said t he ga!r$ up all ! previ\s objections ( sceptics to ! gospel n>rative & hurl$ !m 9 "o mass1 j z if "s ,sadducee at ! "t ( ,jesus' trial _h put all ! taunts & gibes1 all ! buffet+s & insults1 all ! %ame & spitt+1 into "o bl[ deliv]$ /raight into ! face ( ! ,r$eem]4 ,an octog5>ian & sa9tly ,g]man lady said unsuspect+ly t 8someh[ %e nev] c\ld get int]e/$0 9 ,/rauss's ,leb5 ,jesu1 :i* h] sceptical son _h giv5 h] = religi\s read+4 ,! "w 0 almo/ altoge!r de/ructive1 only ! la/ *apt] sugge/+ ,/rauss's own view ( :at ,jesus 04 ,if ,lu!r's dictum is true t 8! he>t is ! be/ !ologian10 ,/rauss mu/ be reg>d$ z de/itute ( ! ma9 qualification = 8 task4 ,encyc4 ,britannica1 #bb3eib--8,/rauss's m9d 0 almo/ exclusively analytical & critical1 )\t dep? ( religi\s feel+1 or philosophical p5etration1 or hi/orical sympa?y4 ,8 "w 0 r>ely con/ructive1 &1 save :5 he 0 deal+ ) a k9dr$ _s1 he fail$ z a hi/orian1 biograph]1 & critic1 /rik+ly illu/rat+ ,goe!'s pr(\ndly true pr9ciple t lov+ sympa?y is ess5tial = productive criticism40 ,pfleid]]1 ,/rauss's ,life ( ,jesus1 xix--8,/rauss %[$ t ! *ur* =m$ ! my?ical traditions ab\t ,jesus out ( its fai? 9 him z ! ,messiah2 b he did n %[ h[ ! *ur* came by ! fai? t ,jesus ( ,naz>e? 0 ! ,messiah40 ,see ,c>p5t]1 ,m5tal ,physiology1 #cfb2 ,grote1 ,plato1 #a3bdi4 ,we object to ! ,my?-!ory ( ,/rauss1 t 7a7 ,! "t betwe5 ! dea? ( ,*ri/ & ! publication ( ! gospels 0 f> too %ort = ! gr[? & consolidation ( su* my?ical hi/ories4 ,my?s1 on ! contr>y1 z ! ,indian1 ,greek1 ,roman & ,sc&9avian in/ances be> witness1 are ! sl[ gr[? ( c5turies4 7b7 ,! fir/ c5tury 0 n a c5tury :5 su* =mation ( my?s 0 possible4 ,in/ead ( be+ a cr$ul\s & imag9ative age1 x 0 an age ( hi/orical inquiry & ( ,sadduceeism 9 matt]s ( religion4 ,horace1 9 ,odes #a3cd & #c3f1 d5\nces ! neglect & squalor ( ! hea!n temples1 & ,juv5al1 ,satire #b3aej1 says t 8,esse aliquid manes et subt]ranea regna ,nec pu]i cr$unt40 ,arnold ( ,rugby3 8,! idea ( m5 writ+ my?ic hi/ories betwe5 ! times ( ,livy & ( ,tacitus1 & ( ,/4 ,paul mi/ak+ !m = realities60 ,pilate's sceptical inquiry1 8,:at is tru?80 7,john #ah3ch71 bett] repres5t$ ! age4 8,! my?ical age is pa/ :5 an idea is pres5t$ ab/ractly--ap>t f n>rative40 ,! ,jewi% sect ( ! ,sadducees %[s t ! rationali/ic _s 0 n conf9$ to ,greeks or ,romans4 ,! "q ( ,john ! ,bapti/1 ,mat4 #aa3c--8;,art ?\ he t come?1 or look we = ano!r80 & our ,"l's answ]1 ,mat4 #aa3d1 #e--8;,g & tell ,john ! ?+ :i* ye he> & see3 ! bl9d receive _! sight 444 ! dead are rais$ up10 %[ t ! ,jews expect$ miracles to be wr\ght by ! ,messiah2 yet ,john #aj3da--8;,john inde$ did no sign0 %[s also no irresi/ible incl9ation to inve/ popul> tea*]s ) miracul\s p[]s2 see ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,*ri/ian ,evid5ces1 #bb2 ,we/cott1 ,com4 on ,john #aj3da2 ,rog]s1 ,sup]human ,orig9 ( ! ,bible1 #fa2 ,cox1 ,miracles1 #ej4 7c7 ,! gospels _c be a my?ical outgr[? ( ,jewi% ideas & expectations1 because1 9 _! ma9 features1 !y run directly c\nt] to ^! ideas & expectations4 ,! sull5 & exclusive nationalism ( ! ,jews c\ld n h giv5 rise to a gospel = all nations1 nor c\ld _! expectations ( a temporal mon>* h l$ to ! /ory ( a suff]+ ,messiah4 ,! ,o4 ,t4 ,apocrypha %[s h[ n>r[ 0 ! outlook ( ! ,jews4 #b ,esdras #f3ee1 #ef says ! ,almighty has made ! _w 8= our sakes02 o!r peoples1 ?\gh !y 8also come f ,adam10 to ! ,et]nal 8are no?+1 b be l unto spittle40 ,! :ole multitude ( !m are only1 be=e him1 8l a s+le f\l drop t oozes out ( a cask0 7,c4 ,geikie1 9 ,s4 ,s4 ,times74 ,*ri/'s k+dom diff]$ f t :i* ! ,jews expect$1 bo? 9 its spirituality & its univ]sality 7,bruce1 ,apologetics1 #c74 ,!re 0 no mission>y impulse 9 ! hea!n _w2 on ! o!r h&1 x 0 blasphemy = an anci5t tribesman to make kn[n 8 god to an outsid] 7,na%1 ,e?ics & ,revelation1 #ajf74 ,! ,apocryphal gospels %[ :at sort ( my?s ! ,n4 ,t4 age w\ld h elaborat$3 ,out ( a demoniac "y woman ,satan is said to dep>t 9 ! =m ( a "y man 7,b]n>d1 9 ,lit]ature ( ! ,second ,c5tury1 #ii-acf74 7d7 ,! belief & propagation ( su* my?s are inconsi/5t ) :at we "k ( ! sob] *>act]s & self-sacrific+ lives ( ! apo/les4 7e7 ,! my?ical !ory _c acc\nt = ! acceptance ( ! gospels among ! ,g5tiles1 :o _h none ( ! ,jewi% ideas & expectations4 7f7 ,x _c expla9 ,*ri/ianity itself1 ) its belief 9 ,*ri/'s crucifixion & resurrection1 & ! ord9ances :i* commemorate ^! facts4 7d7 ,witness ,?omas's d\bt+1 & ,paul's %ipwrecks & sc\rg+s4 ,cf4 #b ,pet4 #a3af-- 8we h n be5 on ! false track ( my?s artificially elaborat$40 ,see ,f4 ,w4 ,f>r>1 ,witness ( ,hi/ory to ,*ri/1 #di-hh4 7e7 ,see ! two books entitl$3 ,if ! ,gospel ,n>ratives are ,my?ical1--,:at ,!n8 &1 ,b ,h[1--if ! ,gospels are ,hi/oric8 7f7 ,z ! exi/5ce ( ! ,am]ican ,republic is pro( t !re 0 once a ,revolution>y ,w>1 s ! exi/5ce ( ,*ri/ianity is pro( ( ! dea? ( ,*ri/4 ,! *ange f ! sev5? day to ! fir/1 9 ,sabba? obs]vance1 c\ld nev] h come ab\t 9 a nation s ,sabbat>ian1 _h n ! fir/ day be5 ! celebration ( an actual resurrection4 ,l ! ,jewi% ,passov] & our own ,indep5d5ce ,day1 ,baptism & ! ,"l's ,supp] _c be acc\nt$ =1 except z monum5ts & remembrances ( hi/orical facts at ! beg9n+ ( ! ,*ri/ian *ur*4 ,see ,muir1 on ! ,"l's ,supp] an abid+ ,witness to ! ,dea? ( ,*ri/1 ,9 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #f3 no4 #cf4 ,on ,/rauss & 8 !ory1 see ,hackett1 9 ,*ri/ian ,rev41 #dh2 ,weiss1 ,life ( ,jesus1 #aee-afc2 ,*ri/lieb1 ,mod4 ,d\bt & ,*ri/4 ,belief1 #cgi-dbe2 ,macle>1 9 ,/riv+s = ! ,fai?1 #a-acf2 ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 9 ,fai? & ,philosophy1 #ddb-dfh2 ,bayne1 ,review ( ,/rauss's ,new ,life1 9 ,!ol4 ,eclectic1 #d3gd2 ,r[1 9 ,lectures on ,mod]n ,scepticism1 #cje-cfj2 ,biblio!ca ,sacra1 ,oct4 #ahga3 art4 by ,pr(4 ,w4 ,a4 ,/ev5s2 ,burgess1 ,antiquity & ,unity ( ,man1 #bfc1 #bfd2 ,curtis on ,inspiration1 #fb-fg2 ,alex&]1 ,*ri/ & ,*ri/ianity1 #ib-abf2 ,a4 ,p4 ,peabody1 9 ,smi?'s ,bible ,dict41 #b3ied-ieh4 #bnd4 ,! ,t5d5cy-!ory ( ,baur 7#agib-ahfj74 ,?is ma9ta9s t ! gospels orig9at$ 9 ! middle ( ! second c5tury1 & 7 writt5 "u assum$ names z a means ( reconcil+ oppos+ ,jewi% & ,g5tile t5d5cies 9 ! *ur*4 8,^! great national t5d5cies f9d _! satisfaction1 n 9 ev5ts correspond+ to !m1 b 9 ! elaboration ( consci\s fictions40 ,baur dates ! f\r? gospel at #afj-agj ,a4 ,d42 ,mat!w at #acj2 ,luke at #aej2 ,m>k at #aej-afj4 ,baur nev] inquires :o ,*ri/ 04 ,he turns 8 att5tion f ! facts to ! docum5ts4 ,if ! docum5ts be prov$ unhi/orical1 !re is no ne$ ( exam9+ ! facts1 = !re are no facts to exam9e4 ,he indicates ! presupposition ( 8 inve/igations1 :5 he says3 8,! pr9cipal argum5t = ! lat] orig9 ( ! gospels mu/ =ev] rema9 ?is1 t sep>ately1 & /ill m :5 tak5 toge!r1 !y give an acc\nt ( ! life ( ,jesus :i* involves impossibilities0--i4 e41 miracles4 ,he w\ld !re=e remove _! au?or%ip f> en\gh f ,jesus' "t to p]mit reg>d+ ! miracles z inv5tions4 ,baur holds t 9 ,*ri/ 7 unit$ ! univ]sali/ic _s ( ! new religion1 & ! p>ticul>i/ic =m ( ! ,jewi% ,messianic idea2 "s ( 8 disciples laid emphasis on ! "o1 "s on ! o!r2 h5ce fir/ conflict1 b f9ally reconciliation2 see /atem5t ( ! ,tb+5 !ory & ( ! way 9 :i* ,baur 0 l$ to x1 9 ,bruce1 ,apologetics1 #cfj4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son int]prets ,baur z foll[s3 8,paul ,prote/ant2 ,pet] sacram5t>ian2 ,james e?ical2 ,paul ,pet] ,james ,*ri/ianity4 ,prote/ant prea*+ %\ld dwell m on ! e?ical--cases ( consci5ce--& less on m]e doctr9e1 su* z reg5]ation & ju/ification40 ,baur 0 a /rang] to ! ne$s ( 8 own s\l1 & s to ! real "* ( ! gospel4 ,"o ( 8 fri5ds & advis]s wrote1 aft] 8 dea?1 9 t]ms t 7 meant to be laudatory3 8,8 0 a completely objective nature4 ,no trace ( p]sonal ne$s or /ruggles is disc]nible 9 connection ) 8 inve/igations ( ,*ri/ianity40 ,! e/imate ( po/]ity is probably express$ 9 ! judgm5t ) reg>d to ! ,tb+5 s*ool by ,h>nack3 8,! possible picture x sket*$ 0 n ! real1 & ! key ) :i* x attempt$ to solve all problems did n suffice = ! mo/ simple4444 ,! ,tb+5 views h inde$ be5 compell$ to und]go v l>ge modifications4 ,z reg>ds ! developm5t ( ! *ur* 9 ! second c5tury1 x may safely be said t ! hypo!ses ( ! ,tb+5 s*ool h prov$ !mselves ev]y:]e inadequate1 v errone\s1 & are to-day held by only a v few s*ol>s40 ,see ,baur1 ,die kanonis*5 ,evangeli52 ,canonical ,gospels 7,eng4 transl471 #ecj2 ,sup]natural ,religion1 #a3bab-ddd & vol4 #b3 ,pfleid]]1 ,hibb]t ,lectures = #ahhe4 ,= acc\nts ( ,baur's position1 see ,h]zog1 ,encyclopdie1 art43 ,baur2 ,cl>ke's transl4 ( ,hase's ,life ( ,jesus1 #cd-cf2 ,f>r>1 ,critical ,hi/ory ( ,free ,?\ght1 #bbg1 #bbh4 ,we object to ! ,t5d5cy-!ory ( ,baur1 t 7a7 ,! de/ructive criticism to :i* x subjects ! gospels1 if appli$ to secul> docum5ts1 w\ld deprive u ( any c]ta9 k ( ! pa/1 & r5d] all hi/ory impossible4 ,! assumption ( artifice is itself unfavorable to a c&id exam9ation ( ! docum5ts4 ,a p]v]se acut5ess c descry evid5ces ( a hidd5 animus 9 ! mo/ simple & +5u\s lit]>y productions4 ,in/ance ! philosophical int]pretation ( 8,jack & ,jill40 7b7 ,! antagoni/ic doctr9al t5d5cies :i* x pr(esses to f9d 9 ! sev]al gospels are m satisfactorily expla9$ z v>i$ b consi/5t aspects ( ! "o sy/em ( tru? held by all ! apo/les4 ,baur exagg]ates ! doctr9al & (ficial diff]5ces betwe5 ! lead+ apo/les4 ,pet] 0 n simply a ,judaiz+ ,*ri/ian1 b 0 ! fir/ prea*] to ! ,g5tiles1 & 8 doctr9e appe>s to h be5 subsequ5tly influ5c$ to a consid]able ext5t by ,paul's 7see ,plumptre on #a ,pet41 #fh-fi74 ,paul 0 n an exclusively ,hell5iz+ ,*ri/ian1 b inv>iably address$ ! gospel to ! ,jews be=e he turn$ to ! ,g5tiles4 ,! evangeli/s give pictures ( ,jesus f diff]5t po9ts ( view4 ,z ! ,p>isian sculptor con/ructs 8 bu/ ) ! aid ( a doz5 photographs ( 8 subject1 all tak5 f diff]5t po9ts ( view1 s f ! f\r portraits furni%$ u by ,mat!w1 ,m>k1 ,luke & ,john we are to con/ruct ! solid & symmetrical life ( ,*ri/4 ,! deep] reality :i* makes reconciliation ( ! diff]5t views possible is ! actual hi/orical ,*ri/4 ,m>cus ,dods1 ,expositor's ,greek ,te/am5t1 #a3fge--8,!y are n two ,*ri/s1 b "o1 :i* ! f\r ,gospels depict3 div]se z ! pr(ile & front face1 b "o ano!r's complem5t r ?an contradiction40 ,godet1 ,introd4 to ,gospel ,collection1 #bgb--,mat!w %[s ! greatness ( ,jesus--8 full-l5g? portrait2 ,m>k 8 indefatigable activity2 ,luke 8 b5efic5t compassion2 ,john 8 ess5tial div9ity4 ,mat!w fir/ wrote ,araman ,logia4 ,?is 0 translat$ into ,greek & complet$ by a n>rative ( ! m9i/ry ( ,jesus = ! ,greek *ur*es f\nd$ by ,paul4 ,?is translation 0 n made by ,mat!w & did n make use ( ,m>k 7#bag-bbd74 ,e4 ,d4 ,burton3 ,mat!w fulfilm5t ( pa/ prophecy2 ,m>k manife/ation ( pres5t p[]4 ,mat!w is argum5t f prophecy2 ,m>k is argum5t f miracle4 ,mat!w1 z prophecy1 made mo/ impression on ,jewi% read]s2 ,m>k1 z p[]1 0 be/ adapt$ to ,g5tiles4 ,pr(4 ,burton holds ,m>k to be bas$ ^u oral tradition alone2 ,mat!w ^u 8 ,logia 78 real e>li] ,gospel7 & o!r fragm5t>y notes2 :ile ,luke has a full] orig9 9 manuscripts & 9 ,m>k4 ,see ,aids to ! ,/udy ( ,g]man ,!ology1 #adh-aee2 ,f4 ,w4 ,f>r>1 ,witness ( ,hi/ory to ,*ri/1 #fa4 7c7 ,x is incr$ible t productions ( su* lit]>y p[] & l(ty religi\s tea*+ z ! gospels %\ld h sprung up 9 ! middle ( ! second c5tury1 or t1 s spr++ up1 !y %\ld h be5 publi%$ "u assum$ names & = cov]t ends4 ,! g5]al "* ( ! lit]ature ( ! second c5tury is illu/rat$ by ,ignatius's fanatical desire = m>tyrdom1 ! value ascrib$ by ,h]mas to ascetic rigor1 ! insipid allegories ( ,b>nabas1 ,clem5t ( ,rome's belief 9 ! phnix1 & ! absurdities ( ! ,apocryphal ,gospels4 ,! au?or ( ! f\r? gospel among ! writ]s ( ! second c5tury w\ld h be5 a m\nta9 among mole-hills4 ,wynne1 ,lit]ature ( ! ,second ,c5tury1 #fj--8,! apo/olic & ! sub-apo/olic writ]s diff] f ea* o!r z a nugget ( pure gold diff]s f a block ( qu>tz ) ve9s ( ! preci\s metal gleam+ ?r\gh x40 ,dorn]1 ,hi/4 ,doct4 ,p]son ,*ri/1 #a3a3ib--8;,in/ead ( ! writ]s ( ! second c5tury m>k+ an advance on ! apo/olic age1 or develop+ ! g]m giv5 !m by ! apo/les1 ! second c5tury %[s great retrogression1--its writ]s 7 n able to reta9 or compreh5d all t _h be5 giv5 !m40 ,m>t9eau1 ,seat ( ,au?ority1 #bia--8,writ]s n only b>b>\s 9 spee* & rude 9 art1 b too (t5 pu]ile 9 conception1 passionate 9 temp]1 & cr$ul\s 9 belief4 ,! leg5ds ( ,papias1 ! visions ( ,h]mas1 ! imbecility ( ,ir5u1 ! fury ( ,t]tullian1 ! rancor & indelicacy ( ,j]ome1 ! /ormy intol]ance ( ,augu/9e1 _c fail to />tle & repel ! /ud5t2 &1 if he turns to ! mild] ,hippolytus1 he is introduc$ to a brood ( ?irty h]esies :i* sadly dissipate 8 dream ( ! unity ( ! *ur*40 ,we c apply to ! writ]s ( ! second c5tury ! "q ( ,r4 ,g4 ,+]soll 9 ! ,%akespe>e-,bacon controv]sy3 8,is x possible t ,bacon left ! be/ *ildr5 ( 8 bra9 on ,%akespe>e's door/ep1 & kept only ! de=m$ ones at home80 ,on ! ,apocryphal ,gospels1 see ,c[p]1 9 ,/riv+s = ! ,fai?1 #gc-ajh4 7d7 ,! !ory requires u to believe 9 a moral anomaly1 namely1 t a fai?ful disciple ( ,*ri/ 9 ! second c5tury c\ld be guilty ( fabricat+ a life ( 8 ma/]1 & ( claim+ au?ority = x on ! gr\nd t ! au?or _h be5 a companion ( ,*ri/ or 8 apo/les4 8,a g5ial set ( ,jesuitical religioni/s0--) m9d & he>t en\gh to write ! gospel accord+ to ,john1 & :o at ! same "t h cold-blood$ sagacity en\gh to keep out ( _! writ+s e trace ( ! developm5ts ( *ur* au?ority belong+ to ! second c5tury4 ,! newly discov]$ 8,tea*+ ( ! ,twelve ,apo/les10 if dat+ f ! e>ly "p ( t c5tury1 %[s t su* a comb9ation is impossible4 ,! critical !ories assume t "o :o knew ,*ri/ z a man c\ld n possibly also reg>d him z ,god4 ,l[rie1 ,doctr9e ( ,/4 ,john1 #ab--8;,if ,/4 ,john wrote1 x is n possible to say t ! g5ius ( ,/4 ,paul foi/$ ^u ! *ur* a conception :i* 0 /range to ! orig9al apo/les40 ,fairbairn has well %[n t if ,*ri/ianity _h be5 simply ! e?ical tea*+ ( ! human ,jesus1 x w\ld h vani%$ f ! e>? l ! sects ( ! ,ph>isees & ( ! ,sadducees2 if on ! o!r h& x _h be5 simply ! ,logos-doctr9e1 ! doctr9e ( a div9e ,*ri/1 x w\ld h pass$ away l ! speculations ( ,plato or ,ari/otle2 because ,*ri/ianity unites ! idea ( ! et]nal ,son ( ,god ) t ( ! inc>nate ,son ( man1 x is fitt$ to be & x has become an univ]sal religion2 see ,fairbairn1 ,philosophy ( ! ,*ri/ian ,religion1 #d1 #ae--8,)\t ! p]sonal *>m ( ! hi/orical ,jesus1 ! cum5ical cre$s w\ld nev] h be5 ei!r =mulat$ or tol]at$1 & )\t ! metaphysical conception ( ,*ri/ ! ,*ri/ian religion w\ld long ago h ceas$ to live4444 ,x is n ,jesus ( ,naz>e? :o has s p[]fully ent]$ into hi/ory3 x is ! deifi$ ,*ri/ :o has be5 believ$1 lov$ & obey$ z ! ,savior ( ! _w4444 ,! two p>ts ( ,*ri/ian doctr9e are comb9$ 9 ! "o "n #8,jesus ,*ri/4' 0 7e7 ,?is !ory _c acc\nt = ! univ]sal acceptance ( ! gospels at ! end ( ! second c5tury1 among widely sep>at$ communities :]e rev]5ce = writ+s ( ! apo/les 0 a m>k ( or?odoxy1 & :]e ! ,gno/ic h]esies w\ld h made new docum5ts in/antly liable to suspicion & se>*+ exam9ation4 ,abbot1 ,g5u95ess ( ! ,f\r? ,gospel1 #eb1 #hj1 #hh1 #hi4 ,! ,johann9e doctr9e ( ! ,logos1 if fir/ prop\nd$ 9 ! middle ( ! second c5tury1 w\ld h ensur$ ! in/ant rejection ( t gospel by ! ,gno/ics1 :o ascrib$ creation1 n to ! ,logos1 b to successive 8ons40 ,h[ did ! ,gno/ics1 )\t 8peep or mutt]10 come to accept z g5u9e :at _h only 9 _! own "t be5 fir/ sprung ^u ! *ur*es8 ,:ile ,basilides 7#acj7 & ,val5t9us 7#aej71 ! ,gno/ics1 bo? quote f ! f\r? gospel1 !y d n dispute its g5u95ess or sugge/ t x 0 ( rec5t orig94 ,bruce1 9 8 ,apologetics1 says ( ,baur 8,he believ$ 9 ! all-suffici5cy ( ! ,hegelian !ory ( developm5t ?r\gh antagonism4 ,he saw t5d5cy ev]y:]e4 ,any?+ additional1 putt+ m cont5ts into ! p]son & tea*+ ( ,jesus ?an suits ! initial /age ( developm5t1 mu/ be reckon$ spuri\s4 ,if we f9d ,jesus 9 any ( ! gospels claim+ to be a sup]natural be+1 su* texts c ) ! utmo/ confid5ce be set aside z spuri\s1 = su* a ?\ght c\ld n belong to ! initial /age ( ,*ri/ianity40 ,b su* a conception c]ta9ly exi/$ 9 ! second c5tury1 & x directly antagoniz$ ! speculations ( ! ,gno/ics4 ,f4 ,w4 ,f>r>1 on ,hebrews #a3b--8,! ^w on 0 us$ by ! lat] ,gno/ics to describe ! v>i\s emanations by :i* !y tri$ at once to wid5 & to bridge ov] ! gulf betwe5 ! human & ! div9e4 ,ov] t imag9>y *asm ,john ?rew ! ar* ( ! ,inc>nation1 :5 he wrote3 #8,! ,^w became fle%' 7,john #a3ad740 ,a docum5t :i* s contradict$ ! ,gno/ic tea*+s c\ld n 9 ! second c5tury h be5 quot$ by ! ,gno/ics !mselves )\t dispute z to its g5u95ess1 if x _h n be5 long recogniz$ 9 ! *ur*es z a "w ( ! apo/le ,john4 7f7 ,! ackn[l$gm5t by ,baur t ! epi/les to ! ,romans1 ,galatians & ,cor9?ians 7 writt5 by ,paul 9 ! fir/ c5tury is fatal to 8 !ory1 s9ce ^! epi/les te/ify n only to miracles at ! p]iod at :i* !y 7 writt51 b to ! ma9 ev5ts ( ,jesus' life & to ! miracle ( 8 resurrection1 z facts already long ackn[l$g$ 9 ! ,*ri/ian *ur*4 ,baur1 ,paulus d] ,apo/el1 #bgf--8,!re nev] has be5 ! slighte/ suspicion ( unau!nticity ca/ on ^! epi/les 7,gal41 #a & #b ,cor41 ,rom471 & !y be> s inconte/ably ! "* ( ,paul9e orig9ality1 t !re is no conceivable gr\nd = ! ass]tion ( critical d\bts 9 _! case40 ,baur1 9 discuss+ ! appe>ance ( ,*ri/ to ,paul on ! way to ,damascus1 expla9s ! outw>d f ! inw>d3 ,paul translat$ int5se & sudd5 conviction ( ! tru? ( ! ,*ri/ian religion into an outw>d sc5e4 ,b ?is _c expla9 ! he>+ ( ! outw>d s\nd by ,paul's companions4 ,on ! evid5tial value ( ! epi/les "h m5tion$1 see ,lorim]1 9 ,/riv+s = ! ,fai?1 #aji-add2 ,h[son1 9 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #d3 no4 #bd2 ,r[1 ,bampton ,lectures = #ahgg3bhi-cef4 ,on ,baur & 8 !ory 9 g5]al1 see ,weiss1 ,life ( ,jesus1 #a3aeg sq42 ,*ri/lieb1 ,mod4 ,d\bt & ,*ri/4 ,belief1 #ejd-edi2 ,hutton1 ,essays1 #a3agf-bae2 ,!ol4 ,eclectic1 #e3a-db2 ,aub]l51 ,div4 ,revelation2 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ai3ge2 ,answ]s to ,sup]natural ,religion1 9 ,we/cott1 ,hi/4 ,n4 ,t4 ,canon1 #d? ed41 ,introd42 ,lightfoot1 9 ,contempor>y ,rev41 ,dec4 #ahgd1 & ,jan4 #ahge2 ,salmon1 ,introd4 to ,n4 ,t41 #f-ca2 ,a4 ,b4 ,bruce1 9 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #g3 no4 #ch4 #c;d4 ,! ,romance-!ory ( ,r5an 7#ahbc-ahib74 ,?is !ory admits a basis ( tru? 9 ! gospels & holds t !y all belong to ! c5tury foll[+ ,jesus' dea?4 8,accord+ to0 ,mat!w1 ,m>k1 etc41 h[ev]1 means only t ,mat!w1 ,m>k1 etc41 wrote ^! gospels 9 sub/ance4 ,r5an claims t ! facts ( ,jesus' life 7 s sublimat$ by en?usiasm1 & s ov]laid ) pi\s fraud1 t ! gospels 9 _! pres5t =m _c be accept$ z g5u9e1--9 %ort1 ! gospels are to be reg>d$ z hi/orical romances :i* h only a f\ndation 9 fact4 ,! animus ( ?is !ory is pla9ly %[n 9 ,r5an's ,life ( ,jesus1 preface to #ac? ed4--8,if miracles & ! inspiration ( c]ta9 books are realities1 my me?od is dete/able4 ,if miracles & ! inspiration ( books are beliefs )\t reality1 my me?od is a good "o4 ,b ! "q ( ! sup]natural is decid$ = u ) p]fect c]ta9ty by ! s+le consid]ation t !re is no room = believ+ 9 a ?+ ( :i* ! _w (f]s no exp]im5tal trace40 8,on ! :ole10 says ,r5an1 8,i admit z au!ntic ! f\r canonical gospels4 ,all1 9 my op9ion1 date f ! fir/ c5tury1 & ! au?ors are1 g5]ally speak+1 ^? to :om !y are attribut$40 ,he reg>ds ,gal41 #a & #b ,cor41 & ,rom41 z 8indisputable & undisput$40 ,he speaks ( !m z 8be+ texts ( an absolute au!nticity1 ( complete s9c]ity1 & )\t leg5ds0 7,les ,aptres1 xxix2 ,les vangiles1 xi74 ,yet he d5ies to ,jesus 8s9c]ity ) himself02 attributes to him 8innoc5t artifice0 & ! tol]ation ( pi\s fraud1 z = example 9 ! case ( ! /ories ( ,laz>us & ( 8 own resurrection4 8,to conceive ! good is n suffici5t3 x mu/ be made to succe$2 to accompli% ?is1 less pure pa?s mu/ be foll[$4444 ,n by any fault ( 8 own1 8 consci5ce lo/ some:at ( its orig9al purity1--8 mission ov]:elm$ him4444 ,did he regret 8 too l(ty nature1 &1 victim ( 8 own greatness1 m\rn t he _h n rema9$ a simple artizan80 ,s ,r5an 8pictures ,*ri/'s lat] life z a mis]y & a lie1 yet he reque/s u to b[ be=e ?is s9n] & be=e 8 sup]ior1 ,sakya-,m\ni1 z demigods0 7see ,nicoll1 ,! ,*ur*'s ,"o ,f\ndation1 #fb1 #fc74 ,( ! highly wr\ght imag9ation ( ,m>y ,magdal5e1 he says3 8,o div9e p[] ( love6 sacr$ mom5ts1 9 :i* ! passion ( "o ^: s5ses 7 deceiv$ gives u a resuscitat$ ,god60 ,see ,r5an1 ,life ( ,jesus1 #ba4 ,to ?is ,romance-!ory ( ,r5an1 we object t 7a7 ,x involves an arbitr>y & p>tial treatm5t ( ! ,*ri/ian docum5ts4 ,! claim t "o writ] n only borr[$ f o!rs1 b int]polat$ ad libitum1 is contradict$ by ! ess5tial agreem5t ( ! manuscripts z quot$ by ! ,fa!rs1 & z n[ extant4 ,r5an1 accord+ to ,mair1 ,*ri/ian ,evid5ces1 #aec1 dates ,mat!w at #hd ,a4 ,d42 ,m>k at #gf2 ,luke at #id2 ,john at #abe4 ,^! dates m>k a consid]able retreat f ! advanc$ positions tak5 by ,baur4 ,mair1 9 8 *apt] on ,rec5t ,rev]ses 9 ,negative ,criticism1 attributes ?is result to ! late discov]ies ) reg>d to ! ,epi/le ( ,b>nabas1 ,hippolytus's ,refutation ( all ,h]esies1 ! ,clem5t9e ,homilies1 & ,tatian's ,diatess>on3 8,accord+ to ,baur & 8 imm$iate foll[]s1 we h less ?an "o qu>t] ( ! ,n4 ,t4 belong+ to ! fir/ c5tury4 ,accord+ to ,hilg5feld1 ! pres5t head ( ! ,baur s*ool1 we h some:at less ?an ?ree qu>t]s belong+ to ! fir/ c5tury1 :ile sub/antially ! same ?+ may be said ) reg>d to ,holzmann4 ,accord+ to ,r5an1 we h di/9ctly m ?an ?ree qu>t]s ( ! ,n4 ,t4 fall+ )9 ! fir/ c5tury1 & !re=e )9 ! apo/olic age4 ,?is surely indicates a v decid$ & extraord9>y retreat s9ce ! "t ( ,baur's gr& assault1 t is1 )9 ! la/ fifty ye>s40 ,we may add t ! concession ( au?or%ip )9 ! apo/olic age r5d]s nugatory ,r5an's hypo!sis t ! ,n4 ,t4 docum5ts h be5 s enl>g$ by pi\s fraud t !y _c be accept$ z tru/wor?y acc\nts ( su* ev5ts z miracles4 ,! oral tradition itself _h atta9$ s fix$ a =m t ! _m manuscripts us$ by ! ,fa!rs 7 9 sub/antial agreem5t 9 respect to ^! v ev5ts1 & oral tradition 9 ! ,ea/ h&s d[n )\t s]i\s alt]ation mu* long] n>ratives ?an ^? ( our gospels4 ,! ,pundita ,ramabai c repeat aft] ! lapse ( tw5ty ye>s portions ( ! ,h9du sacr$ books exce$+ 9 am\nt ! :ole cont5ts ( our ,old ,te/am5t4 ,_m cultivat$ m5 9 ,a!ns knew by he>t all ! ,iliad & ! ,odyssey ( ,hom]4 ,memory & rev]5ce alike kept ! gospel n>ratives free f ! corruption :i* ,r5an supposes4 7b7 ,x attributes to ,*ri/ & to ! apo/les an alt]nate f]vor ( romantic en?usiasm & a false pret5se ( miracul\s p[] :i* are utt]ly irreconcilable ) ! manife/ sobriety & hol9ess ( _! lives & tea*+s4 ,if ,jesus did n "w miracles1 he 0 an impo/or4 ,on ,erne/ ,r5an1 ,8 ,life & ! ,life ( ,jesus1 see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #ccb-cfc1 especially #cef--8,r5an attributes ! orig9 ( ,*ri/ianity to ! pr$om9ance 9 ,pale/9e ( a con/itutional susceptibility to my/ic excitem5ts4 ,*ri/ is to him ! inc>nation ( sympa?y & te>s1 a be+ ( t5d] impulses & passionate ardors1 ^: native g5ius x 0 to play ^u ! he>ts ( m54 ,tru? or falsehood made little diff]5ce to him2 any?+ t w\ld com=t ! poor1 or t\* ! f9] feel+s ( humanity1 he avail$ himself (2 ec/asies1 visions1 melt+ moods1 ^! 7 ! secrets ( 8 p[]4 ,religion 0 a b5efic5t sup]/ition1 a sweet delusion--excell5t z a balm & solace = ! ignorant cr[d1 :o nev] c\ld be philosoph]s if !y tri$4 ,& s ! gospel riv]1 z "o has said1 is trac$ back to a f\nta9 ( weep+ m5 & wom5 ^: bra9s _h ooz$ out at _! eyes1 & ! p]fection ( spirituality is made to be a sort ( maudl9 mona/icism4444 ,h[ diff]5t f ! /rong & holy love ( ,*ri/1 :i* w\ld save m5 only by br++ !m to ! tru?1 & :i* claims m5's imitation only because1 )\t love = ,god & = ! s\l1 a man is )\t tru?4 ,h[ inexplicable f ?is view ! fact t a pure ,*ri/ianity has ev]y:]e quick5$ ! intellect ( ! nations1 & t e revival ( x1 z at ! ,re=mation1 has be5 foll[$ by mighty =w>d leaps ( civilization4 ,0 ,paul a man c>ri$ away by my/ic dreams & irrational en?usiasms8 ,let ! ke5 dialectic skill ( 8 epi/les & 8 pr(\nd grasp ( ! great matt]s ( revelation answ]4 ,has ! ,*ri/ian *ur* be5 a company ( pul+ s5tim5tali/s8 ,let ! h]oic dea?s = ! tru? suff]$ by ! m>tyrs witness4 ,nay1 he mu/ h a l[ idea ( 8 k9d1 & a yet l[] idea ( ! ,god :o made !m1 :o c believe t ! noble/ spirits ( ! race h ris5 to greatness by abnegat+ w & reason1 & h ga9$ influ5ce ov] all ages by resign+ !mselves to semi-idiocy40 7c7 ,x fails to acc\nt = ! p[] & progress ( ! gospel1 z a sy/em directly oppos$ to m5's natural ta/es & prepossessions--a sy/em :i* sub/itutes tru? = romance & law = impulse4 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #ceh--8;,& if ! lat] triumphs ( ,*ri/ianity are inexplicable ^u ! !ory ( ,r5an1 h[ c we expla9 its f\nd+8 ,! sweet swa9 ( ,galilee1 belov$ by wom5 = 8 beauty1 fasc9at+ ! unlett]$ cr[d by 8 g5tle spee* & 8 poetic ideals1 giv+ com=t to ! sorr[+ & hope to ! poor1 cr$it$ ) sup]natural p[] :i* at fir/ he ?9ks x n wor? :ile to d5y & f9ally gratifies ! multitude by pret5d+ to ex]cise1 r\s$ by opposition to polemics & invective until ! delightful "y rabbi becomes a gloomy giant1 an intractable fanatic1 a fi]ce revolutioni/1 ^: d5unciation ( ! p[]s t be br+s him to ! ,cross1--:at is !re 9 him to acc\nt = ! moral wond] :i* we call ,*ri/ianity & ! beg9n+s ( its empire 9 ! _w8 ,nei!r delici\s pa/orals l ^? ( ,jesus' fir/ p]iod1 nor apocalyptic fev]s l ^? ( 8 second p]iod1 accord+ to ,r5an's gospel1 furni% any rational explanation ( t mighty movem5t :i* has swept ?r\gh ! e>? & has revolutioniz$ ! fai? ( mank9d40 ,b]doe1 ,br[n+1 #dg--8;,if ,*ri/ 7 n ,god1 8 life at t /age ( ! _w's hi/ory c\ld by no possibility h _h ! vitaliz+ =ce & love-compell+ p[] t ,r5an's pages ev]y:]e disclose4 ,r5an has /r5g!n$ fai? 9 ,*ri/'s deity :ile labor+ to de/roy x40 ,r5an1 9 discuss+ ,*ri/'s appe>ance to ,paul on ! way to ,damascus1 expla9s ! inw>d f ! outw>d1 ?us precisely rev]s+ ! conclusion ( ,baur4 ,a sudd5 /orm1 a fla% ( lightn+1 a sudd5 attack ( oph?almic fev]1 ,paul took z an appe>ance f heav54 ,b we reply t s ke5 an obs]v] & reason] c\ld n h be5 ?us deceiv$4 ,no?+ c\ld h made him ! apo/le to ! ,g5tiles b a sight ( ! glorifi$ ,*ri/ & ! accompany+ revelation ( ! hol9ess ( ,god1 8 own s91 ! sacrifice ( ! ,son ( ,god1 its univ]sal efficacy1 ! obligation laid ^u him to proclaim x to ! ends ( ! e>?4 ,= reviews ( ,r5an1 see ,hutton1 ,essays1 #bfa-bha1 & ,contemp4 ,?\ght & ,?9k]s1 #a3bbg-bcd2 ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 ,fai? & ,philosophy1 #dja-dda2 ,*ri/lieb1 ,mod4 ,d\bt1 #dbe-ddg2 ,press5s1 9 ,!ol4 ,eclectic1 #a3aii2 ,uhlhorn1 ,mod4 ,repres5tations ( ,life ( ,jesus1 #a-cc2 ,bib4 ,sac1 #bb3bjg2 #bc3cec1 #ebi2 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #c3 no4 #af1 & #d3 no4 #ba2 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,*ri/ian ,evid5ces1 #dc-dh2 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,s]mon be=e ,bapti/ ,_w ,congress1 #aije4 #d?4 ,! ,developm5t-!ory ( ,h>nack 7born #ahea74 ,?is holds ,*ri/ianity to be a hi/orical developm5t f g]ms :i* 7 devoid ( bo? dogma & miracle4 ,jesus 0 a tea*] ( e?ics1 & ! orig9al gospel is mo/ cle>ly repres5t$ by ! ,s]mon on ! ,m\nt4 ,greek influ5ce1 & especially t ( ! ,alex&rian philosophy1 add$ to ?is gospel a !ological & sup]natural elem5t1 & s *ang$ ,*ri/ianity f a life into a doctr9e4 ,h>nack dates ,mat!w at #gj-ge2 ,m>k at #fe-gj2 ,luke at #gh-ic2 ! f\r? gospel at #hj-aaj4 ,he reg>ds bo? ! f\r? gospel & ! book ( ,revelation z ! works1 n ( ,john ! ,apo/le1 b ( ,john ! ,presbyt]4 ,he sep>ates ! prologue ( ! f\r? gospel f ! gospel itself1 & consid]s ! prologue z a preface add$ aft] its orig9al composition 9 ord] to enable ! ,hell5i/ic read] to und]/& x4 8,! gospel itself10 says ,h>nack1 8conta9s no ,logos-idea2 x did n develop out ( a ,logos-idea1 su* z fl\ri%$ at ,alex&ria2 x only connects itself ) su* an idea4 ,! gospel itself is bas$ ^u ! hi/oric ,*ri/2 he is ! subject ( all its /atem5ts4 ,?is hi/orical trait c 9 no way be dissolv$ by any k9d ( speculation4 ,! memory ( :at 0 actually hi/orical 0 /ill too p[]ful to admit at ?is po9t any ,gno/ic influ5ces4 ,! ,logos-idea ( ! prologue is ! ,logos ( ,alex&r9e ,judaism1 ! ,logos ( ,philo1 & x is d]iv$ ultimately f ! ',son ( man' 9 ! book ( ,daniel4444 ,! f\r? gospel1 :i* does n proce$ f ! ,apo/le ,john & does n s claim1 _c be us$ z a hi/orical s\rce 9 ! ord9>y s5se ( t ^w4444 ,! au?or has manag$ ) sov]eign fre$om2 has transpos$ occurr5ces & has put !m 9 a light t is =eign to !m2 has ( 8 own accord compos$ ! disc\rses1 & has illu/rat$ l(ty ?\ghts by inv5t+ situations = !m4 ,difficult z x is to recognize1 an actual tradition 9 8 "w is n :olly lack+4 ,= ! hi/ory ( ,jesus1 h[ev]1 x c h>dly any:]e be tak5 into acc\nt2 only little c be tak5 f x1 & t ) caution4444 ,on ! o!r h& x is a s\rce ( ! fir/ rank = ! answ] ( ! "q :at liv+ views ( ! p]son ( ,jesus1 :at light & :at w>m?1 ! gospel has br\ght into be+40 ,see ,h>nack's article 9 ,zeits*rift fr ,!ol4 u4 ,kir*e1 #b3ahi-bca1 & 8 ,wes5 des ,*ri/5?ums1 #ac4 ,kaftan also1 :o belongs to ! same ,rits*lian s*ool ) ,h>nack1 tells u 9 8 ,tru? ( ! ,*ri/ian ,religion1 #a3ig1 t z ! result ( ! ,logos-speculation1 8! c5tre ( gravity1 in/ead ( be+ plac$ 9 ! hi/orical ,*ri/ :o f\nd$ ! k+dom ( ,god1 is plac$ 9 ! ,*ri/ :o z et]nal ,logos ( ,god 0 ! m$iator 9 ! creation ( ! _w40 ,?is view is elaborat$ by ,hat* 9 8 ,hibb]t ,lectures = #ahhh1 on ! ,influ5ce ( ,greek ,ideas & ,usages ^u ! ,*ri/ian ,*ur*4 ,we object to ! ,developm5t-!ory ( ,h>nack1 t 7a7 ,! ,s]mon on ! ,m\nt is n ! sum ( ! gospel1 nor its orig9al =m4 ,m>k is ! mo/ orig9al ( ! gospels1 yet ,m>k omits ! ,s]mon on ! ,m\nt1 & ,m>k is prem95tly ! gospel ( ! miracle-work]4 7b7 ,all f\r gospels lay ! emphasis1 n on ,jesus' life & e?ical tea*+1 b on 8 dea? & resurrection4 ,mat!w implies ,*ri/'s deity :5 x ass]ts 8 absolute k ( ! ,fa!r 7#aa3bg71 8 univ]sal judge%ip 7#be3cb71 8 supreme au?ority 7#bh3ah71 & 8 omnipres5ce 7#bh3bj71 :ile ! phrase 8,son ( man0 implies t he is also 8,son ( ,god40 ,mat4 #aa3bg--8;,all ?+s h be5 deliv]$ unto me ( my ,fa!r3 & no "o kn[e? ! ,son1 save ! ,fa!r2 nei!r do? any "k ! ,fa!r1 save ! ,son1 & he to :omsoev] ! ,son wille? to reveal him02 #be3cb--8;& be=e him %all be ga!r$ all ! nations3 & he %all sep>ate !m "o f ano!r1 z ! %eph]d sep>ate? ! %eep f ! goats02 #bh3ah--8;,all au?ority ha? be5 giv5 unto me 9 heav5 & on e>?02 #bh3bj--8lo1 ,i am ) y always1 ev5 unto ! end ( ! _w40 ,^! say+s ( ,jesus 9 ,mat!w's gospel %[ t ! conception ( ,*ri/'s greatness 0 n peculi> to ,john3 8,i am0 transc5ds "t2 8) y0 transc5ds space4 ,jesus speaks 8sub specie et]nitatis02 8 utt]ance is equival5t to t ( ,john #h3eh--8;,be=e ,abraham 0 born1 ,i am10 & to t ( ,hebrews #ac3h--8;,jesus ,*ri/ is ! same ye/]day & to-day1 yea & = ev]40 ,he is1 z ,paul decl>es 9 ,eph4 #a3bc1 "o 8t fille? all 9 all10 t is1 :o is omnipres5t4 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,philos4 & ,religion1 #bjf--,! phrase 8,son ( man0 intimates t ,*ri/ 0 m ?an man3 8,suppose ,i 7 to g ab\t proclaim+ myself #8,son ( man4' ,:o does n see t x w\ld be m]e imp]t95ce1 unless ,i claim$ to be some?+ m4 #8,son ( ,man8 ,b :at ( t8 ,_c e human be+ call himself ! same8' ,:5 "o takes ! title #8,son ( man' = 8 *>act]i/ic designation1 z ,jesus did1 he implies t !re is some?+ /range 9 8 be+ ,son ( man2 t ?is is n 8 orig9al condition & dignity2 t x is condesc5sion on 8 "p to be ,son ( man4 ,9 %ort1 :5 ,*ri/ calls himself ,son ( man1 x implies t he has come f a high] level ( be+ to inhabit ?is l[ e>? ( ours4 ,& s1 :5 we are ask$ #8,:at ?9k ye ( ! ,*ri/8 ^: son is he8' we mu/ answ]1 n simply1 ,he is ,son ( man1 b also1 ,he is ,son ( ,god40 ,on ,son ( man1 see ,driv]2 on ,son ( ,god1 see ,s&ay2 bo? 9 ,ha/+s' ,diction>y ( ! ,bible4 ,s&ay3 8,! ,son is s call$ prim>ily z inc>nate4 ,b t :i* is ! ess5ce ( ! ,inc>nation mu/ ne$s be also l>g] ?an ! ,inc>nation4 ,x mu/ ne$s h its roots 9 ! et]nity ( ,godhead40 ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #fe1 #gc--8;,*ri/1 ! f9al ,judge1 ( ! synoptics1 is n dissociable f ! div9e1 et]nal ,be+1 ( ! f\r? gospel40 7c7 ,! prexi/5ce & atonem5t ( ,*ri/ _c be reg>d$ z accretions ^u ! orig9al gospel1 s9ce ^! f9d expression 9 ,paul :o wrote be=e any ( our evangeli/s1 & 9 8 epi/les anticipat$ ! ,logos-doctr9e ( ,john4 7d7 ,we may grant t ,greek influ5ce1 ?r\gh ! ,alex&rian philosophy1 help$ ! ,new ,te/am5t writ]s to disc]n :at 0 already pres5t 9 ! life & "w & tea*+ ( ,jesus2 b1 l ! microscope :i* discov]s b does n create1 x add$ no?+ to ! sub/ance ( ! fai?4 ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #fb--8,! div9ity1 inc>nation1 resurrection ( ,*ri/ 7 n an accretion ^u ! orig9al belief ( ! apo/les & _! fir/ disciples1 = ^! are all recogniz$ z uncontrov]t$ matt]s ( fai? 9 ! f\r great epi/les ( ,paul1 writt5 at a date :5 ! great] "p ( ^? :o _h se5 ! ris5 ,*ri/ 7 /ill alive40 ,! ,alex&rian philosophy 0 n ! s\rce ( apo/olic doctr9e1 b only ! =m 9 :i* t doctr9e 0 ca/1 ! light ?r[n ^u x :i* br\ght out its mean+4 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #adf--8,:5 we come to ,john's gospel1 !re=e1 we f9d 9 x ! m]e unfold+ ( tru? t = sub/ance _h be5 9 ! _w = at lea/ sixty ye>s4444 ,if ! ,platoniz+ philosophy ( ,alex&ria assi/$ 9 ?is g5u9e developm5t ( ,*ri/ian doctr9e1 !n ! ,alex&rian philosophy 0 a provid5tial help to inspiration4 ,! microscope does n inv5t2 x only discov]s4 ,paul & ,john did n add to ! tru? ( ,*ri/2 _! philosophical equipm5t 0 only a microscope :i* br\ght into cle> view ! tru? t 0 !re already40 ,pfleid]]1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #a3abf--8,! metaphysical conception ( ! ,logos1 z imman5t 9 ! _w & ord]+ x accord+ to law1 0 fill$ ) religi\s & moral cont5ts4 ,9 ,jesus ! cosmical pr9ciple ( nature became a religi\s pr9ciple ( salvation40 ,see ,kilpatrick's article on ,philosophy1 9 ,ha/+s' ,bible ,diction>y4 ,kilpatrick holds t ,h>nack ignores ! self-consci\sness ( ,jesus2 does n fairly int]pret ! ,acts 9 its m5tion ( ! e>ly wor%ip ( ,jesus by ! *ur* be=e ,greek philosophy _h influ5c$ x2 ref]s to ! intellectual peculi>ities ( ! ,n4 ,t4 writ]s conceptions :i* ,paul insi/s are simply ! fai? ( all ,*ri/ian p z su*2 =gets t ! ,*ri/ian idea ( union ) ,god secur$ ?r\gh ! aton+ & reconcil+ "w ( a p]sonal ,r$eem] utt]ly transc5d$ ,greek ?\ght1 & furni%$ ! solution ( ! problem aft] :i* ,greek philosophy 0 va9ly grop+4 7e7 ,?\gh ,m>k says no?+ ( ! virg9-bir? because 8 /ory is limit$ to :at ! apo/les _h witness$ ( ,jesus' de$s1 ,mat!w app>5tly gives u ,joseph's /ory & ,luke gives ,m>y's /ory--bo? /ories naturally publi%$ only aft] ,jesus' resurrection4 7f7 ,! l>g] und]/&+ ( doctr9e aft] ,jesus' dea? 0 itself pr$ict$ by our ,"l 7,john #af3ab74 ,! ,holy ,_s 0 to br+ 8 tea*+s to remembrance1 & to guide into all ! tru? 7#af3ac71 & ! apo/les 7 to cont9ue ! "w ( tea*+ :i* he _h begun 7,acts #a3a74 ,john #af3ab1 #ac--8;,i h yet _m ?+s to say unto y1 b ye _c be> !m n[4 ,h[beit1 :5 he1 ! ,_s ( tru?1 is come1 he %all guide y into all ! tru?02 ,acts #a3a--8,! =m] treatise ,i made1 ,o ,!ophilus1 conc]n+ all t ,jesus began to d & to tea*40 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #adf--8,t ! belov$ disciple1 aft] a half c5tury ( m$itation ^u :at he _h se5 & he>d ( ,god manife/ 9 ! fle%1 %\ld h p5etrat$ m deeply into ! mean+ ( t wond]ful revelation is n only n surpris+1--x is precisely :at ,jesus himself =etold4 ,our ,"l _h _m ?+s to say to 8 disciples1 b !n !y c\ld n be> !m4 ,he promis$ t ! ,holy ,_s %\ld br+ to _! remembrance bo? himself & 8 words1 & %\ld lead !m into all ! tru?4 ,& ?is is ! :ole secret ( :at are call$ accretions to orig9al ,*ri/ianity4 ,s f> z !y are conta9$ 9 ,scripture1 !y are inspir$ discov]ies & unfold+s1 n m]e speculations & inv5tions4 ,!y are n additions1 b elucidations1 n va9 imag9+s1 b correct int]pretations4444 ,:5 ! lat] !ology1 !n1 ?r[s out ! sup]natural & dogmatic1 z com+ n f ,jesus b f ,paul's epi/les & f ! f\r? gospel1 our claim is t ,paul & ,john are only inspir$ & au?oritative int]pret]s ( ,jesus1 see+ !mselves & mak+ u see ! fulness ( ! ,godhead t dwelt 9 him40 ,:ile ,h>nack1 9 our judgm5t1 errs 9 8 view t ,paul contribut$ to ! gospel elem5ts :i* x did n orig9ally possess1 he %[s u v cle>ly _m ( ! elem5ts 9 t gospel :i* he 0 ! fir/ to recognize4 ,9 8 ,wes5 des ,*ri/5?ums1 #aaa1 he tells u t a few ye>s ago a celebrat$ ,prote/ant !ologian decl>$ t ,paul1 ) 8 ,rabb9ical !ology1 0 ! de/roy] ( ! ,*ri/ian religion4 ,o!rs h reg>d$ him z ! f\nd] ( t religion4 ,b ! majority h se5 9 him ! apo/le :o be/ und]/ood 8 ,"l & did mo/ to cont9ue 8 "w4 ,paul1 z ,h>nack ma9ta9s1 fir/ compreh5d$ ! gospel def9itely3 7#a7 z an accompli%$ r$emption & a pres5t salvation--! crucifi$ & ris5 ,*ri/ z giv+ access to ,god & righte\sness & peace !re)2 7#b7 z some?+ new1 :i* does away ) ! religion ( ! law2 7#c7 z meant = all1 & !re=e = ,g5tiles also1 inde$1 z sup]s$+ ,judaism2 7#d7 z express$ 9 t]ms :i* are n simply ,greek b also human1--,paul made ! gospel compreh5sible to ! _w4 ,islam1 ris+ 9 ,arabia1 is an ,arabian religion /ill4 ,buddhism rema9s an ,indian religion4 ,*ri/ianity is at home 9 all l&s4 ,paul put new life into ! ,roman empire1 & inaugurat$ ! ,*ri/ian culture ( ! ,we/4 ,he turn$ a local into a univ]sal religion4 ,8 influ5ce h[ev]1 accord+ to ,h>nack1 t5d$ to ! undue exaltation ( organization & dogma & ,o4 ,t4 inspiration--po9ts 9 :i*1 9 our judgm5t1 ,paul took sob] middle gr\nd & sav$ ,*ri/ian tru? = ! _w4 #b4 ,g5u95ess ( ! ,books ( ! ,old ,te/am5t4 ,s9ce ne>ly "o half ( ! ,old ,te/am5t is ( anonym\s au?or%ip & c]ta9 ( its books may be attribut$ to def9ite hi/oric *>act]s only by way ( conv5i5t classification or ( lit]>y p]sonification1 we "h mean by g5u95ess hone/y ( purpose & fre$om f any?+ c\nt]feit or int5tionally deceptive s f> z respects ! age or ! au?or%ip ( ! docum5ts4 ,we %[ ! g5u95ess ( ! ,old ,te/am5t books3 7a7 ,f ! witness ( ! ,new ,te/am5t1 9 :i* all b six books ( ! ,old ,te/am5t are ei!r quot$ or allud$ to z g5u9e4 ,! ,n4 ,t4 %[s co9cid5ces ( language ) ! ,o4 ,t4 ,apocryphal books1 b x conta9s only "o direct quotation f !m2 :ile1 ) ! exception ( ,judges1 ,ecclesia/es1 ,canticles1 ,e/h]1 ,ezra1 & ,nehemiah1 e book 9 ! ,hebrew canon is us$ ei!r = illu/ration or pro(4 ,! s+le ,apocryphal quotation is f\nd 9 ,jude #ad & is 9 all probability tak5 f ! book ( ,eno*4 ,al?\gh ,volkm> puts ! date ( ?is book at #acb ,a4 ,d41 & al?\gh "s critics hold t ,jude quot$ only ! same primitive tradition ( :i* ! au?or ( ! book ( ,eno* aft]w>ds made use1 ! weight ( mod]n s*ol>%ip incl9es to ! op9ion t ! book itself 0 writt5 z e>ly z #agj-gj ,b4 ,c41 & t ,jude quot$ f x2 see ,ha/+s' ,bible ,diction>y3 ,book ( ,eno*2 ,s&ay1 ,bampton ,lect4 on ,inspiration1 #ie4 8,if ,paul c\ld quote f ,g5tile poets 7,acts #ag3bh2 ,titus #a3ab71 x is h>d to und]/& :y ,jude c\ld n cite a "w :i* 0 c]ta9ly 9 high /&+ among ! fai?ful02 see ,s*odde1 ,book ( ,eno*1 #da1 ) ! ,introd4 by ,ezra ,abbot4 ,:ile ,jude #ad gives u ! only direct & express quotation f an ,apocryphal book1 ,jude #f & #i conta9 allusions to ! ,book ( ,eno* & to ! ,assumption ( ,moses2 see ,*>les1 ,assumption ( ,moses1 #fb4 ,9 ,hebrews #a3c1 we h words tak5 f ,wisdom #g3bf2 & ,hebrews #aa3cd-ch is a rem9isc5ce ( #a ,maccabees4 7b7 ,f ! te/imony ( ,jewi% au?orities1 anci5t & mod]n1 :o decl>e ! same books to be sacr$1 & only ! same books1 t are n[ compris$ 9 our ,old ,te/am5t ,scriptures4 ,josephus enum]ates tw5ty-two ( ^! books 8:i* are ju/ly accr$it$0 7omit --,niese1 & ,ha/+s' ,dict41 #c3fjg74 ,our pres5t ,hebrew ,bible makes tw5ty-f\r1 by sep>at+ ,ru? f ,judges1 & ,lam5tations f ,j]emiah4 ,see ,josephus1 ,aga9/ ,apion1 #a3h2 ,smi?'s ,bible ,diction>y1 article on ! ,canon1 #a3cei1 #cfj4 ,philo 7born #bj ,b4 ,c47 nev] quotes an ,apocryphal book1 al?\gh he does quote f ne>ly all ! books ( ! ,o4 ,t42 see ,ryle1 ,philo & ,holy ,scripture4 ,george ,adam ,smi?1 ,mod]n ,criticism & ,prea*+1 #g--8,! !ory :i* ascrib$ ! ,canon ( ! ,o4 ,t4 to a s+le decision ( ! ,jewi% *ur* 9 ! days ( its inspiration is n a !ory support$ by facts4 ,! gr[? ( ! ,o4 ,t4 ,canon 0 v gradual4 ,virtually x began 9 #fba ,b4 ,c41 ) ! acceptance by all ,judah ( ,deut]onomy1 & ! adoption ( ! :ole ,law1 or fir/ five books ( ! ,o4 ,t41 "u ,nehemiah 9 #dde ,b4 ,c4 ,!n came ! prophets be=e #bjj ,b4 ,c41 & ! ,hagiographa f a c5tury to two c5turies lat]4 ,! /rict def9ition ( ! la/ division 0 n complete by ! "t ( ,*ri/4 ,*ri/ seems to te/ify to ! ,law1 ! ,prophets1 & ! ,psalms2 yet nei!r ,*ri/ nor 8 apo/les make any quotation f ,ezra1 ,nehemiah1 ,e/h]1 ,canticles1 or ,ecclesia/es1 ! la/ ( :i* books 7 n yet recogniz$ by all ! ,jewi% s*ools4 ,b :ile ,*ri/ is ! *ief au?ority = ! ,o4 ,t41 he 0 also its fir/ critic4 ,he reject$ "s p>ts ( ! ,law & 0 indiff]5t to _m o!rs4 ,he enl>g$ ! six? & sev5? comm&m5ts1 & rev]s$ ! eye = an eye1 & ! p]mission ( divorce2 t\*$ ! lep]1 & reckon$ all foods lawful2 broke away f lit]al obs]vance ( ! ,sabba?-day2 left no comm&s ab\t sacrifice1 temple-wor%ip1 circumcision1 b1 by in/itution ( ! ,new ,cov5ant1 abrogat$ ^! sacram5ts ( ! ,old4 ,! apo/les appeal$ to extra-canonical writ+s40 ,gladd51 ,sev5 ,puzzl+ ,bible ,books1 #fh-if--8;,d\bts 7 ent]ta9$ 9 our ,"l's day z to ! canonicity ( sev]al p>ts ( ! ,o4 ,t41 especially ,prov]bs1 ,ecclesia/es1 ,song ( ,solomon1 ,e/h]40 7c7 ,f ! te/imony ( ! ,septuag9t translation1 dat+ f ! fir/ half ( ! ?ird c5tury1 or f #bhj to #ahj ,b4 ,c4 ,,mss4 ( ! ,septuag9t conta91 inde$1 ! ,o4 ,t4 ,apocrypha1 b ! writ]s ( ! latt] d n recognize _! own "w z on a level ) ! canonical ,scriptures1 :i* !y reg>d z di/9ct f all o!r books 7,ecclesia/icus1 prologue1 & #dh3bd2 also #bd3bc-bg2 #a ,mac4 #ab3i2 #b ,mac4 #f3bc2 #a ,esd4 #a3bh2 #f3a2 ,b>u* #b3ba74 ,s bo? anci5t & mod]n ,jews4 ,see ,bissell1 9 ,lange's ,comm5t>y on ! ,apocrypha1 ,introduction1 #dd4 ,9 ! prologue to ! apocryphal book ( ,ecclesia/icus1 we read ( 8! ,law & ! ,prophets & ! re/ ( ! books10 :i* %[s t z e>ly z #acj ,b4 ,c41 ! probable date ( ,ecclesia/icus1 a ?reefold division ( ! ,jewi% sacr$ books 0 recogniz$4 ,t ! au?or1 h[ev]1 did n conceive ( ^! books z con/itut+ a complet$ canon seems evid5t f 8 ass]tion 9 ?is connection t 8 gr&fa!r ,jesus also wrote4 #a ,mac4 #ab3i 7#hj-ij ,b4 ,c47 speaks ( 8! sacr$ books :i* are n[ 9 our h&s40 ,ha/+s1 ,bible ,diction>y1 #c3faa--8,! ,o4 ,t4 0 ! result ( a gradual process :i* began ) ! sanction ( ! ,hexateu* by ,ezra & ,nehemiah1 & practically clos$ ) ! decisions ( ! ,c\ncil ( ,jamnia0--,jamnia is ! anci5t ,jabneh1 #g miles s\? by we/ ( ,tib]ias1 :]e met a c\ncil ( rabb9s at "s "t betwe5 #ij to #aah ,a4 ,d4 ,?is ,c\ncil decid$ 9 favor ( ,canticles & ,ecclesia/es1 & clos$ ! ,o4 ,t4 ,canon4 ,! ,greek v]sion ( ! ,p5tateu* :i* =ms a "p ( ! ,septuag9t is said by ,josephus to h be5 made 9 ! reign & by ! ord] ( ,ptolemy ,philadelphus1 ,k+ ( ,egypt1 ab\t #bgj or #bhj ,b4 ,c4 8,! leg5d is t x 0 made by sev5ty-two p]sons 9 sev5ty-two days4 ,x is suppos$1 h[ev]1 by mod]n critics t ?is v]sion ( ! sev]al books is ! "w n only ( diff]5t h&s b ( sep>ate times4 ,x is probable t at fir/ only ! ,p5tateu* 0 translat$1 & ! rema9+ books gradually2 b ! translation is believ$ to h be5 complet$ by ! second c5tury ,b4 ,c40 7,c5tury ,diction>y1 9 voce74 ,x !re=e furni%es an important witness to ! g5u95ess ( our ,o4 ,t4 docum5ts4 ,driv]1 ,introd4 to ,o4 ,t4 ,lit41 xxxi--8,= ! op9ion1 (t5 met ) 9 mod]n books1 t ! ,canon ( ! ,o4 ,t4 0 clos$ by ,ezra1 or 9 ,ezra's "t1 !re is no f\ndation 9 antiquity :atev]4444 ,all t c reasonably be treat$ z hi/orical 9 ! acc\nts ( ,ezra's lit]>y labors is limit$ to ! ,law40 7d7 ,f indications t soon aft] ! exile1 & s e>ly z ! times ( ,ezra & ,nehemiah 7#ejj-dej ,b4 ,c471 ! ,p5tateu* toge!r ) ! book ( ,jo%ua 0 n only 9 exi/5ce b 0 reg>d$ z au?oritative4 #b ,mac1 #b3ac-ae intimates t ,nehemiah f\nd$ a libr>y1 & !re is a tradition t a 8,great ,synagogue0 0 ga!r$ 9 8 "t to det]m9e ! ,canon4 ,b ,ha/+s' ,diction>y1 #d3fdd1 ass]ts t 8! ,great ,synagogue 0 orig9ally a meet+1 & n an in/itution4 ,x met once = all1 & all t is told ab\t x1 except :at we read 9 ,nehemiah1 is pure fable ( ! lat] ,jews40 ,9 l mann] no dep5d5ce is to be plac$ ^u ! tradition t ,ezra miracul\sly re/or$ ! anci5t ,scriptures t _h be5 lo/ dur+ ! exile4 ,clem5t ( ,alex&ria says3 8,s9ce ! ,scriptures p]i%$ 9 ! ,captivity ( ,nebu*adnezz>1 ,esdras 7! ,greek =m ( ,ezra7 ! ,levite1 ! prie/1 9 ! "t ( ,artax]xes1 ,k+ ( ! ,p]sians1 hav+ become inspir$ 9 ! ex]cise ( prophecy1 re/or$ aga9 ! :ole ( ! anci5t ,scriptures40 ,b ! "w n[ divid$ into #a & #b ,*ronicles1 ,ezra & ,nehemiah1 m5tions ,d>ius ,codomannus 7,neh4 #ab3bb71 ^: date is #ccf ,b4 ,c4 ,! utmo/ ! tradition proves is t ab\t #cjj ,b4 ,c4 ! ,p5tateu* 0 9 "s s5se attribut$ to ,moses2 see ,bacon1 ,g5esis ( ,g5esis1 #ce2 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahfc3cha1 #ffj1 #gii2 ,smi?1 ,bible ,dict41 art43 ,p5tateu*2 ,!ological ,eclectic1 #f3bae2 ,bissell1 ,hi/4 ,orig9 ( ! ,bible1 #cih-djc4 ,on ! ,m5 ( ! ,great ,synagogue1 see ,wright1 ,ecclesia/es1 #e-ab1 #dge-dgg4 7e7 ,f ! te/imony ( ! ,sam>itan ,p5tateu*1 dat+ f ! "t ( ,ezra & ,nehemiah 7#ejj-dej ,b4 ,c474 ,! ,sam>itans _h be5 br\ght by ! k+ ( ,assyria f 8,babylon1 & f ,cu?ah & f ,avva1 & f ,hama? & ,seph>vaim0 7#b ,k4 #ag3f1 #bd1 #bf71 to take ! place ( ! p ( ,israel :om ! k+ _h c>ri$ away captive to 8 own l&4 ,! coloni/s _h br\ght _! hea!n gods ) !m1 & ! incursions ( wild bea/s :i* ! int]mission ( tillage occasion$ gave rise to ! belief t ! ,god ( ,israel 0 aga9/ !m4 ,"o ( ! captive ,jewi% prie/s 0 !re=e s5t to tea* !m 8! law ( ! god ( ! l&0 & he 8taught !m h[ !y %\ld fe> ,jehovah0 7#b ,k4 #ag3bg1 #bh74 ,! result 0 t !y adopt$ ! ,jewi% ritual1 b comb9$ ! wor%ip ( ,jehovah ) t ( _! grav5 images 7v]se #cc74 ,:5 ! ,jews return$ f ,babylon & began to rebuild ! walls ( ,j]usalem1 ! ,sam>itans (f]$ _! aid1 b ?is aid 0 indignantly refus$ 7,ezra #d & ,nehemiah #d74 ,ho/ility arose betwe5 ,jews & ,sam>itans--a ho/ility :i* cont9u$ n only to ! "t ( ,*ri/ 7,john #d3i71 b ev5 to ! pres5t day4 ,s9ce ! ,sam>itan ,p5tateu* sub/antially co9cides ) ! ,hebrew ,p5tateu*1 x furni%es u ) a def9ite pa/ date at :i* x c]ta9ly exi/$ 9 ne>ly its pres5t =m4 ,x witnesses to ! exi/5ce ( our ,p5tateu* 9 ess5tially its pres5t =m z f> back z ! "t ( ,ezra & ,nehemiah4 ,gre51 ,high] ,criticism ( ! ,p5tateu*1 #dd1 #de--8;,aft] be+ repuls$ by ! ,jews1 ! ,sam>itans1 to sub/antiate _! claim ( be+ sprung f anci5t ,israel1 eag]ly accept$ ! ,p5tateu* :i* 0 br\ght !m by a r5egade prie/40 ,w4 ,rob]tson ,smi?1 9 ,encyc4 ,brit41 #ba3bdd--8,! prie/ly law1 :i* is ?r\gh\t bas$ on ! practice ( ! prie/s ( ,j]usalem be=e ! captivity1 0 r$uc$ to =m aft] ! exile1 & 0 fir/ publi%$ by ,ezra z ! law ( ! rebuilt temple ( ,zion4 ,! ,sam>itans mu/ !re=e h d]iv$ _! ,p5tateu* f ! ,jews aft] ,ezra's re=ms1 i4 e41 aft] #ddd ,b4 ,c4 ,be=e t "t ,sam>itanism _c h exi/$ 9 a =m at all simil> to t :i* we "k2 b !re mu/ h be5 a community ready to accept ! ,p5tateu*40 ,see ,smi?'s ,bible ,diction>y1 art43 ,sam>itan ,p5tateu*2 ,ha/+s1 ,bible ,diction>y1 art43 ,sam>ia2 ,/anley ,lea!s1 ,/ructure ( ! ,o4 ,t41 #a-da4 7f7 ,f ! f9d+ ( 8! book ( ! law0 9 ! temple1 9 ! eighte5? ye> ( ,k+ ,josiah1 or 9 #fba ,b4 ,c4 #b ,k4 #bb3h--8;,& ,hilkiah ! high prie/ said unto ,%aphan ! scribe1 ,i h f\nd ! book ( ! law 9 ! h\se ( ,jehovah40 #bc3b--8,! book ( ! cov5ant0 0 read be=e ! p by ! k+ & proclaim$ to be ! law ( ! l&4 ,curtis1 9 ,ha/+s' ,bible ,dict41 #c3eif--8,! e>lie/ writt5 law or book ( div9e in/ruction ( ^: introduction or enactm5t an au!ntic acc\nt is giv51 0 ,deut]onomy or its ma9 portion1 repres5t$ z f\nd 9 ! temple 9 ! #ah? ye> ( k+ ,josiah 7,b4 ,c4 #fba7 & proclaim$ by ! k+ z ! law ( ! l&4 ,f t "t =w>d ,israel _h a writt5 law :i* ! pi\s believ] 0 comm&$ to pond] day & night 7,jo%ua #a3h2 ,ps4 #a3b72 & ?us ! ,torah1 z sacr$ lit]ature1 =mally comm5c$ 9 ,israel4 ,?is law aim$ at a "r application ( ,mosaic pr9ciples40 ,ryle1 9 ,ha/+s' ,bible ,dict41 #a3fjb--8,! law ( ,deut]onomy repres5ts an expansion & developm5t ( ! anci5t code conta9$ 9 ,exodus #bj-bc1 & prec$es ! f9al =mulation ( ! prie/ly ritual1 :i* only receiv$ its ultimate =m 9 ! la/ p]iod ( revis+ ! /ructure ( ! ,p5tateu*40 ,&rew ,h>p]1 on ,deut]onomy1 9 ,expositor's ,bible3 8,deut]onomy does n claim to h be5 writt5 by ,moses4 ,he is spok5 ( 9 ! ?ird p]son 9 ! introduction & hi/orical framework1 :ile ! spee*es ( ,moses are 9 ! fir/ p]son4 ,9 portions :]e ! au?or speaks = himself1 ! phrase 'beyond ,jordan' means ea/ ( ,jordan2 9 ! spee*es ( ,moses ! phrase #8beyond ,jordan' means we/ ( ,jordan2 & ! only exception is ,deut4 #c3h1 :i* _c orig9ally h be5 "p ( ! spee* ( ,moses4 ,b ! /yle ( bo? p>ts is ! same1 & if ! #crd p]son p>ts are by a lat] au?or1 ! #a/ p]son p>ts are by a lat] au?or also4 ,bo? diff] f o!r spee*es ( ,moses 9 ! ,p5tateu*4 ,c ! au?or be a contempor>y writ] :o gives ,moses' words1 z ,john gave ! words ( ,jesus8 ,no1 = ,deut]onomy cov]s only ! book ( ! ,cov5ant1 ,exodus #bj-bc4 ,x uses ,,je b n ,p1 ) :i* ,,je is int]wov54 ,b ,,je appe>s 9 ,jo%ua & contributes to x an acc\nt ( ,jo%ua's dea?4 ,,je speaks ( k+s 9 ,israel 7,g54 #cf3ca-ci74 ,deut]onomy pla9ly belongs to ! e>ly c5turies ( ! ,k+dom1 or to ! middle ( x40 ,bacon1 ,g5esis ( ,g5esis1 #dc-di--8,! ,deut]onomic law 0 s %ort t ,%aphan c\ld read x al\d be=e ! k+ 7#b ,k4 #bb3aj7 & ! k+ c\ld read #8! :ole ( x' be=e ! p 7#bc3b72 comp>e ! read+ ( ! ,p5tateu* = a :ole week 7,neh4 #h3b-ah74 ,x 0 9 ! =m ( a cov5ant2 x 0 di/+ui%$ by curses2 x 0 an expansion & modification1 fully )9 ! legitimate prov9ce ( ! prophet1 ( a ,torah ( ,moses codifi$ f ! traditional =m ( at lea/ a c5tury be=e4 ,su* a ,torah exi/$1 0 attribut$ to ,moses1 & is n[ incorporat$ z #8! book ( ! cov5ant' 9 ,exodus #bj to #bd4 ,! ye> #fbj is !re=e ! t]m9us a quo ( ,deut]onomy4 ,! date ( ! prie/ly code is #ddd ,b4 ,c40 ,s&ay1 ,bampton ,lectures = #ahic1 grants 87#a7 ! pres5ce 9 ! ,p5tateu* ( a consid]able elem5t :i* 9 its pres5t %ape is held by _m to be n e>li] ?an ! captivity2 7#b7 ! composition ( ! book ( ,deut]onomy1 n long1 or at lea/ n v long1 be=e its promulgation by k+ ,josiah 9 ! ye> #fba1 :i* ?us becomes a pivot-date 9 ! hi/ory ( ,hebrew lit]ature40 7g7 ,f ref]5ces 9 ! prophets ,hosea 7,b4 ,c4 #gdc-gcg7 & ,amos 7#gei-gde7 to a c\rse ( div9e tea*+ & revelation ext5d+ f> back ( _! day4 ,hosea #h3ab--8;,i wrote = him ! t5 ?\s& ?+s ( my law02 "h is ass]t$ ! exi/5ce prior to ! "t ( ! prophet1 n only ( a law1 b ( a writt5 law4 ,all critics admit ! book ( ,hosea to be a g5u9e production ( ! prophet1 dat+ f ! eigh? c5tury ,b4 ,c42 see ,gre51 9 ,presb4 ,rev41 #ahhf3ehe-fjh4 ,amos #b3d--8!y h reject$ ! law ( ,jehovah1 & h n kept 8 /atutes02 "h is pro( t1 m ?an a c5tury be=e ! f9d+ ( ,deut]onomy 9 ! temple1 ,israel 0 acqua9t$ ) ,god's law4 ,fi%]1 ,nature & ,me?od ( ,revelation1 #bf1 #bg--8,! l(ty plane rea*$ by ! prophets 0 n rea*$ at a s+le b\nd4444 ,!re mu/ h be5 a tap-root ext5d+ f> d[n into ! e>?40 ,kurtz rem>ks t 8! lat] books ( ! ,o4 ,t4 w\ld be a tree )\t roots1 if ! composition ( ! ,p5tateu* 7 transf]r$ to a lat] p]iod ( ,hebrew hi/ory40 ,if we sub/itute = ! ^w 8,p5tateu*0 ! words 8,book ( ! cov5ant10 we may ass5t to ?is dictum ( ,kurtz4 ,!re is suffici5t evid5ce t1 be=e ! times ( ,hosea & ,amos1 ,israel possess$ a writt5 law--! law embrac$ 9 ,exodus #bj-bd--;b ! ,p5tateu* z we n[ h x1 includ+ ,leviticus1 seems to date no fur!r back ?an ! "t ( ,j]emiah1 #dde ,b4 ,c4 ,! ,levitical law h[ev] 0 only ! codification ( /atutes & cu/oms ^: orig9 lay f> back 9 ! pa/ & :i* 7 believ$ to be only ! natural expansion ( ! pr9ciples ( ,mosaic legislation4 ,lea!s1 ,/ructure ( ,o4 ,t41 #ed--8,zeal = ! re/oration ( ! temple aft] ! exile impli$ t x _h long be=e be5 ! c5tre ( ! national polity1 t !re _h be5 a ritual & a law be=e ! exile40 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #c3eb--,levitical in/itutions c\ld n h be5 fir/ e/abli%$ by ,david4 ,x is inconceivable t he 8c\ld h tak5 a :ole tribe1 & no trace rema9 ( s revolution>y a measure z ! dispossess+ !m ( _! prop]ty to make !m m9i/]s ( religion40 ,james ,rob]tson1 ,e>ly ,hi/ory ( ,israel3 8,! v>i$ lit]ature ( #hej-gej ,b4 ,c4 implies ! exi/5ce ( read+ & writ+ = "s "t be=e4 ,amos & ,hosea hold1 = ! p]iod succe$+ ,moses1 ! same s*eme ( hi/ory :i* mod]n critics pron\nce late & unhi/orical4 ,! eigh? c5tury ,b4 ,c4 0 a "t ( broad hi/oric day1 :5 ,israel _h a def9ite acc\nt to give ( itself & ( its hi/ory4 ,! critics appeal to ! prophets1 b !y reject ! prophets :5 ^! tell u t o!r tea*]s taught ! same tru? be=e !m1 & :5 !y decl>e t _! nation _h be5 taught a bett] religion & _h decl9$ f x1 9 o!r words1 t !re _h be5 law long be=e _! day4 ,! k+s did n give law4 ,! prie/s presuppos$ x4 ,!re mu/ h be5 a =mal sy/em ( law mu* e>li] ?an ! critics admit1 & also an e>li] ref]5ce 9 _! wor%ip to ! great ev5ts :i* made !m a sep>ate p40 ,& ,dillman goes yet fur!r back & decl>es t ! entire "w ( ,moses presupposes 8a prep>atory /age ( high] religion 9 ,abraham40 7h7 ,f ! repeat$ ass]tions ( ,scripture t ,moses himself wrote a law = 8 p1 confirm$ z ^! are by evid5ce ( lit]>y & legislative activity 9 o!r nations f> ant$at+ 8 "t4 ,ex4 #bd3d--8;,& ,moses wrote all ! words ( ,jehovah02 #cd3bg--8;,& ,jehovah said unto ,moses1 ,write ?\ ^! words3 = aft] ! t5or ( ^! words ,i h made a cov5ant ) !e & ) ,israel02 ,num4 #cc3b--8;,& ,moses wrote _! go+s out accord+ to _! j\rneys by ! comm&m5t ( ,jehovah02 ,deut4 #ca3i--8;,& ,moses wrote ?is law1 & deliv]$ x unto ! prie/s ! sons ( ,levi1 t b>e ! ark ( ! cov5ant ( ,jehovah1 & unto all ! eld]s ( ,israel02 #bb--8,s ,moses wrote ?is song ! same day1 & taught x ! *ildr5 ( ,israel02 #bd-bf--8;,& x came to pass1 :5 ,moses _h made an end ( writ+ ! words ( ?is law 9 a book1 until !y 7 f9i%$1 t ,moses comm&$ ! ,levites1 t b>e ! ark ( ! cov5ant ( ,jehovah1 say+1 ,take ?is book ( ! law1 & put x by ! side ( ! ark ( ! cov5ant ( ,jehovah y\r ,god1 t x may be !re = a witness aga9/ !e40 ,! law "h m5tion$ may possibly be only 8! book ( ! cov5ant0 7,ex4 #bj-bd71 & ! spee*es ( ,moses 9 ,deut]onomy may h be5 orally h&$ d[n4 ,b ! fact t ,moses 0 8in/ruct$ 9 all ! wisdom ( ! ,egyptians0 7,acts #g3bb71 toge!r ) ! fact t ! art ( writ+ 0 kn[n 9 ,egypt = _m hundr$ ye>s be=e 8 "t1 make x m probable t a l>g] portion ( ! ,p5tateu* 0 ( 8 own composition4 ,k5yon1 9 ,ha/+s' ,dict41 art43 ,writ+1 dates ! ,prov]bs ( ,ptah-hotep1 ! fir/ record$ lit]>y composition 9 ,egypt1 at #cehj-cecf ,b4 ,c41 & ass]ts ! free use ( writ+ among ! ,sum]ian inhabitants ( ,babylonia z e>ly z #djjj ,b4 ,c4 ,! /atutes ( ,hammurabi k+ ( ,babylon comp>e = ext5t ) ^? ( ,leviticus1 yet !y date back to ! "t ( ,abraham1 #bbjj ,b4 ,c41--inde$ ,hammurabi is n[ reg>d$ by _m z ! ,amraphel ( ,g54 #ad3a4 ,yet ^! /atutes ant$ate ,moses by #gjj ye>s4 ,x is int]e/+ to obs]ve t ,hammurabi pr(esses to h receiv$ 8 /atutes directly f ! ,sun-god ( ,sipp>1 8 capital city4 ,see translation by ,w9ckl]1 9 ,d] alte ,ori5t1 #ig2 ,johns1 ,! ,olde/ ,code ( ,laws2 ,kelso1 9 ,pr9ceton ,!ol4 ,rev41 ,july1 #aije3cii-dab--;,facts 8au!nticate ! traditional date ( ! ,book ( ! ,cov5ant1 ov]?r[ ! =mula ,prophets & ,law1 re/ore ! old ord] ,law & ,prophets1 & put into hi/orical p]spective ! tradition t ,moses 0 ! au?or ( ! ,s9aitic legislation40 ,z ! controv]sy ) reg>d to ! g5u95ess ( ! ,old ,te/am5t books has turn$ ( late ^u ! claims ( ! ,high] ,criticism 9 g5]al1 & ^u ! claims ( ! ,p5tateu* 9 p>ticul>1 we subjo9 sep>ate notes ^u ^! subjects4 ,! ,high] ,criticism 9 g5]al4 ,high] ,criticism does n mean criticism 9 any invidi\s s5se1 any m ?an ,kant's ,critique ( ,pure ,reason 0 an unfavorable or de/ructive exam9ation4 ,x is m]ely a dispassionate inve/igation ( ! au?or%ip1 date & purpose ( ,scripture books1 9 ! light ( _! composition1 /yle & int]nal *>act]i/ics4 ,z ! ,l[] ,criticism is a text-critique1 ! ,high] ,criticism is a /ructure-critique4 ,a bright ,fr5*man describ$ a lit]>y critic z "o :o rips op5 ! doll to get at ! sawdu/ !re is 9 x4 ,?is c be done ) a sceptical & ho/ile _s1 & !re c be little d\bt t "s ( ! high] critics ( ! ,old ,te/am5t h begun _! /udies ) prepossessions aga9/ ! sup]natural1 :i* h vitiat$ all _! conclusions4 ,^! presuppositions are (t5 unconsci\s1 b none ! less influ5tial4 ,:5 ,bi%op ,col5so exam9$ ! ,p5tateu* & ,jo%ua1 he disclaim$ any int5tion ( assail+ ! miracul\s n>ratives z su*2 z if he _h said3 8,my de> little fi%1 y ne$ n fe> me2 ,i d n wi% to cat* y2 ,i only int5d to dra9 ! pond 9 :i* y live40 ,to _m s*ol>s ! wat]s at pres5t seem v l[ 9 ! ,hexateu* & inde$ ?r\gh\t ! :ole ,old ,te/am5t4 ,%akespe>e made ov] & incorporat$ _m old ,*ronicles ( ,plut>* & ,hol9%$1 & _m ,italian tales & e>ly trag$ies ( o!r writ]s2 b ,p]icles & ,titus ,&ronicus /ill pass curr5t "u ! "n ( ,%akespe>e4 ,we speak ev5 n[ ( 8,ges5ius' ,hebrew ,gramm>10 al?\gh ( its tw5ty-sev5 editions ! la/ f\rte5 h be5 publi%$ s9ce 8 dea?1 & m ( x has be5 writt5 by o!r editors ?an ,ges5ius ev] wrote himself4 ,we speak ( 8,web/]'s ,diction>y10 ?\gh !re are 9 ! 8,unabridg$0 ?\s&s ( words & def9itions t ,web/] nev] saw4 ,francis ,br[n3 8,a mod]n writ] ma/]s old] records & writes a :olly new book4 ,n s ) ea/]n hi/orians4 ,! late/ com]1 z ,r5an says1 #8absorbs 8 pr$ecessors )\t assimilat+ !m1 s t ! mo/ rec5t has 9 its belly ! fragm5ts ( ! previ\s works 9 a raw /ate4' ,! ,diatess>on ( ,tatian is a p>allel to ! composite /ructure ( ! ,o4 ,t4 books4 ,"o passage yields ! foll[+3 ,mat4 #ba3ab;a2 ,john #b3ad;a2 ,mat4 #ba3ab;b2 ,john #b3ad;b1 #ae2 ,mat4 #ba3ab;c1 #ac2 ,john #b3af2 ,m>k #aa3af2 ,john #b3ag-bb2 all succe$+ ea* o!r )\t a break40 ,gore1 ,lux ,mundi1 #cec--8,!re is no?+ mat]ially untru?ful1 ?\gh !re is some?+ uncritical1 9 attribut+ ! :ole legislation to ,moses act+ "u ! div9e comm&4 ,x w\ld be only ( a piece ) ! attribution ( ! collection ( ,psalms to ,david1 & ( ,prov]bs to ,solomon40 ,! oppon5ts ( ! ,high] ,criticism h mu* to say 9 reply4 ,sayce1 ,e>ly ,hi/ory ( ! ,hebrews1 holds t ! e>ly *apt]s ( ,g5esis 7 copi$ f ,babylonian s\rces1 b he insi/s ^u a ,mosaic or pre-,mosaic date = ! copy+4 ,hilpre*t h[ev] decl>es t ! mono!i/ic fai? ( ,israel c\ld nev] h proce$$ 8f ! ,babylonian m\nta9 ( gods--t *>nel-h\se full ( corruption & dead m5's bones40 ,bissell1 ,g5esis ,pr9t$ 9 ,colors1 ,introd41 iv--8,x is improbable t s _m docum5t>y hi/ories exi/$ s e>ly1 or if exi/+ t ! compil] %\ld h attempt$ to comb9e !m4 ,/range t ! e>li] %\ld be ,j & %\ld use ! ^w #8,jehovah1' :ile ! lat] ,p %\ld use ! ^w #8,elohim1' :5 #8,jehovah' w\ld h f> bett] suit$ ! ,prie/s' ,code4444 xiii--,! ,babylonian tablets conta9 9 a cont9u\s n>rative ! m prom95t facts ( bo? ! alleg$ ,elohi/ic & ,jehovi/ic sections ( ,g5esis1 & pres5t !m ma9ly 9 ! ,biblical ord]4 ,sev]al hundr$ ye>s be=e ,moses :at ! critics call two 7 already "o4 ,x is absurd to say t ! unity 0 due to a r$actor at ! p]iod ( ! exile1 #ddd ,b4 ,c4 ,he :o believes t ,god reveal$ himself to primitive man z "o ,god1 w see 9 ! ,akkadian /ory a poly!i/ic corruption ( ! orig9al mono!i/ic acc\nt40 ,we mu/ n e/imate ! antiquity ( a pair ( boots by ! la/ pat* :i* ! cobbl] has add$2 nor mu/ we e/imate ! antiquity ( a ,scripture book by ! glosses & explanations add$ by lat] editors4 ,z ! ,london ,spectator rem>ks on ! ,hom]ic problem3 8,x is z impossible t a fir/-rate poem or "w ( art %\ld be produc$ )\t a great ma/]-m9d :i* fir/ conceives ! :ole1 z t a f9e liv+ bull %\ld be develop$ out ( beef-sausages40 ,z we %all proce$ to %[1 h[ev]1 ^! utt]ances ov]e/imate ! unity ( ! ,p5tateu* & ignore "s /rik+ evid5ces ( its gradual gr[? & composite /ructure4 ,! ,au?or%ip ( ! ,p5tateu* 9 p>ticul>4 ,rec5t critics1 especially ,ku55 & ,rob]tson ,smi?1 h ma9ta9$ t ! ,p5tateu* is ,mosaic only 9 ! s5se ( be+ a gradually gr[+ body ( traditional law1 :i* 0 codifi$ z late z ! "t ( ,ezekiel1 &1 z ! developm5t ( ! _s & tea*+s ( ! great law-giv]1 0 call$ by a legal fiction aft] ! "n ( ,moses & 0 attribut$ to him4 ,! actual ord] ( composition is !re=e3 7#a7 ,book ( ! ,cov5ant 7,exodus #bj-bc72 7#b7 ,deut]onomy2 7#c7 ,leviticus4 ,among ! reasons assign$ = ?is view are ! facts 7a7 t ,deut]onomy ends ) an acc\nt ( ,moses' dea?1 & !re=e c\ld n h be5 writt5 by ,moses2 7b7 t 9 ,leviticus ,levites are m]e s]vants to ! prie/s1 :ile 9 ,deut]onomy ! prie/s are (ficiat+ ,levites1 or1 9 o!r words1 all ! ,levites are prie/s2 7c7 t ! books ( ,judges & ( #a ,samuel1 ) _! record ( sacrifices (f]$ 9 _m places1 give no evid5ce t ei!r ,samuel or ! nation ( ,israel _h any k ( a law conf9+ wor%ip to a local sanctu>y4 ,see ,ku551 ,prophets & ,prophecy 9 ,israel2 ,wellhaus51 ,ges*i*te ,israels1 ,b& #a2 & art43 ,israel1 9 ,encyc4 ,brit41 #ac3cih1 #cii1 #dae2 ,w4 ,rob]tson ,smi?1 ,o4 ,t4 9 ,jewi% ,*ur*1 #cjf1 #chf1 & ,prophets ( ,israel2 ,ha/+s1 ,bible ,dict41 arts43 ,deut]onomy1 ,hexateu*1 & ,canon ( ! ,o4 ,t4 ,x has be5 urg$ 9 reply1 7#a7 t ,moses may h writt51 n autographically1 b ?r\gh a scribe 7p]haps ,jo%ua71 & t ?is scribe may h complet$ ! hi/ory 9 ,deut]onomy ) ! acc\nt ( ,moses' dea?2 7#b7 t ,ezra or subsequ5t prophets may h subject$ ! :ole ,p5tateu* to rec5sion1 & may h add$ explanatory notes2 7#c7 t docum5ts ( previ\s ages may h be5 incorporat$1 9 c\rse ( its composition by ,moses1 or subsequ5tly by 8 successors2 7#d7 t ! app>5t lack ( di/9ction betwe5 ! diff]5t classes ( ,levites 9 ,deut]onomy may be expla9$ by ! fact t1 :ile ,leviticus 0 writt5 ) exact detail = ! prie/s1 ,deut]onomy is ! record ( a brief g5]al & oral summ>y ( ! law1 address$ to ! p at l>ge & !re=e naturally m5tion+ ! cl]gy z a :ole2 7#e7 t ! sil5ce ( ! book ( ,judges z to ! ,mosaic ritual may be expla9$ by ! design ( ! book to describe only g5]al hi/ory1 & by ! probability t at ! tab]nacle a ritual 0 obs]v$ ( :i* ! p 9 g5]al 7 ignorant4 ,sacrifices 9 o!r places only accompani$ special div9e manife/ations :i* made ! recipi5t tempor>ily a prie/4 ,ev5 if x 7 prov$ t ! law ) reg>d to a c5tral sanctu>y 0 n obs]v$1 x w\ld n %[ t ! law did n exi/1 any m ?an violation ( ! second comm&m5t by ,solomon proves 8 ignorance ( ! decalogue1 or ! m$ival neglect ( ! ,n4 ,t4 by ! ,roman *ur* proves t ! ,n4 ,t4 did n !n exi/4 ,we _c argue t 8:]e !re 0 transgression1 !re 0 no law0 7,watts1 ,new ,apologetic1 #hc1 & ,! ,new] ,criticism74 ,9 ! light ( rec5t rese>*1 h[ev]1 we _c reg>d ^! replies z satisfactory4 ,woods1 9 8 article on ! ,hexateu*1 ,ha/+s' ,diction>y1 #b3cfe1 pres5ts a mod]ate /atem5t ( ! results ( ! high] criticism :i* comm5ds itself to u z m tru/wor?y4 ,he calls x a !ory ( /ratification1 & holds t 8c]ta9 m or less indep5d5t docum5ts1 deal+ l>gely ) ! same s]ies ( ev5ts1 7 compos$ at diff]5t p]iods1 or1 at any rate1 "u diff]5t auspices1 & 7 aft]w>ds comb9$1 s t our pres5t ,hexateu*1 :i* means our ,p5tateu* ) ! addition ( ,jo%ua1 conta9s ^! sev]al diff]5t lit]>y /rata4444 ,! ma9 gr\nds = accept+ ?is hypo!sis ( /ratification are 7#a7 t ! v>i\s lit]>y pieces1 ) v few exceptions1 w be f\nd on exam9ation to arrange !mselves by common *>act]i/ics into comp>atively few gr\ps2 7#b7 t an orig9al consecution ( n>rative may be frequ5tly trac$ betwe5 :at 9 _! pres5t =m are isolat$ fragm5ts4 8,?is w be bett] und]/ood by ! foll[+ illu/ration4 ,let u suppose a problem ( ?is k9d3 ,giv5 a pat*work quilt1 expla9 ! "* ( ! orig9al pieces out ( :i* ! bits ( /uff compos+ ! quilt 7 cut4 ,fir/1 we notice t1 h[ev] well ! colors may bl5d1 h[ev] nice & complete ! :ole may look1 _m ( ! adjo9+ pieces d n agree 9 mat]ial1 texture1 patt]n1 color1 or ! l4 ,ergo1 !y h be5 made up out ( v diff]5t pieces ( /uff4444 ,b suppose we fur!r discov] t _m ( ! bits1 ?\gh n[ sep>at$1 are l "o ano!r 9 mat]ial1 texture1 etc41 we may conjecture t ^! h be5 cut out ( "o piece4 ,b we %all prove ?is beyond reasonable d\bt if we f9d t sev]al bits :5 unpick$ fit toge!r1 s t ! patt]n ( "o is cont9u$ 9 ! o!r2 &1 moreov]1 t if all ( l "* are sort$ out1 !y =m1 say1 f\r gr\ps1 ea* ( :i* 0 evid5tly once a s+le piece ( /uff1 ?\gh p>ts ( ea* are f\nd miss+1 because1 no d\bt1 !y h n be5 requir$ to make ! :ole4 ,b we make ! analogy ( ! ,hexateu* ev5 clos]1 if we fur!r suppose t 9 c]ta9 p>ts ( ! quilt ! bits belong+ to1 say1 two ( ^! gr\ps are s comb9$ z to =m a subsidi>y patt]n )9 ! l>g] patt]n ( ! :ole quilt1 & _h evid5tly be5 sew$ toge!r be=e be+ connect$ ) o!r p>ts ( ! quilt2 & we may make x ev5 clos] /ill1 if we suppose t1 besides ! m important bits ( /uff1 small] embelli%m5ts1 bord]+s1 & ! l1 _h be5 add$ s z to improve ! g5]al effect ( ! :ole40 ,! au?or ( ?is article goes on to po9t out ?ree ma9 portions ( ! ,hexateu* :i* ess5tially diff] f ea* o!r4 ,!re are ?ree di/9ct codes3 ! ,cov5ant code 7,c--,ex4 #bj3bb to #bc3cc1 & #bd3c-h71 ! ,deut]onomic code 7,d71 & ! ,prie/ly code 7,p74 ,^! codes h peculi> relations to ! n>rative portions ( ! ,hexateu*4 ,9 ,g5esis1 = example1 8! great] "p ( ! book is divid$ into gr\ps ( long] or %ort] pieces1 g5]ally p>agraphs or *apt]s1 di/+ui%$ respectively by ! almo/ exclusive use ( ,elohim or ,jehovah z ! "n ( ,god40 ,let u call ^! portions ,j & ,e4 ,b we f9d su* close aff9ities betwe5 ,c & ,,je1 t we may reg>d !m z sub/antially "o4 8,we %all f9d t ! l>g] "p ( ! n>ratives1 z di/9ct f ! laws1 ( ,exodus & ,numb]s belong to ,,je2 :]eas1 ) special exceptions1 ! legal portions belong to ,p4 ,9 ! la/ *apt]s ( ,deut]onomy & 9 ! :ole ( ,jo%ua we f9d elem5ts ( ,,je4 ,9 ! latt] book we also f9d elem5ts :i* connect x ) ,d4 8,x %\ld be obs]v$ t n only d we f9d "h & !re sep>ate pieces 9 ! ,hexateu*1 %[n by _! *>act]s to belong to ^! ?ree s\rces1 ,,je1 ,d1 & ,p1 b ! pieces w (t5 be f\nd connect$ toge!r by an obvi\s cont9uity ( subject :5 piec$ toge!r1 l ! bits ( pat*work 9 ! illu/ration ) :i* we />t$4 ,= example1 if we read cont9u\sly ,g54 #aa3bg-cc2 #ab3d;b1 #e2 #ac3f;a1 #aa;b1 #ab;a2 #af3a;a1 #c1 #ae1 #af2 #ag2 #ai3bi2 #ba3a;a1 #b;b-#e2 #bc2 #be3g-aa;a--passages ma9ly1 on o!r gr\nds1 attribut$ to ,p1 we get an almo/ cont9u\s & complete1 ?\gh v concise1 acc\nt ( ,abraham's life40 ,we may conc$e ! sub/antial correctness ( ! view ?us prop\nd$4 ,x simply %[s ,god's actual me?od 9 mak+ up ! record ( 8 revelation4 ,we may add t any s*ol> :o grants t ,moses did n himself write ! acc\nt ( 8 own dea? & burial 9 ! la/ *apt] ( ,deut]onomy1 or :o recognizes two diff]+ acc\nts ( creation 9 ,g5esis #a & #b1 has already begun an analysis ( ! ,p5tateu* & has accept$ ! ess5tial pr9ciples ( ! high] criticism4 ,9 addition to ! lit]ature already ref]r$ to m5tion may also be made ( ,driv]'s ,introd4 to ,o4 ,t41 #aah-aej1 & ,deut]onomy1 ,introd42 ,w4 ,r4 ,h>p]1 9 ,hebraica1 ,oct4-,dec4 #ahhh1 & ,w4 ,h4 ,gre5's reply 9 ,hebraica4 ,jan4-,apr4 #ahhi2 also ,gre51 ,! ,unity ( ! ,book ( ,g5esis1 ,moses & ! ,prophets1 ,hebrew ,fea/s1 & ,high] ,criticism ( ! ,p5tateu*2 ) articles by ,gre5 9 ,presb4 ,rev41 ,jan4 #ahhb & ,oct4 #ahhf2 ,h[>d ,osgood1 9 ,essays on ,p5tateu*al ,criticism1 & 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,oct4 #ahhh1 & ,july1 #ahic2 ,watts1 ,! ,new] ,criticism1 & ,new ,apologetic1 #hc2 ,presb4 ,rev41 arts4 by ,h4 ,p4 ,smi?1 ,april1 #ahhb1 & by ,f4 ,l4 ,patton1 #ahhc3cda-daj2 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,april1 #ahhb3bia-cdd1 & by ,g4 ,f4 ,wright1 ,july1 #ahih3eae-ebe2 ,brit4 ,qu>41 ,july1 #ahha3abc2 ,jan4 #ahhd3ach-adc2 ,mead1 ,sup]natural ,revelation1 #cgc-che2 ,/ebb9s1 ,a ,/udy 9 ! ,p5tateu*2 ,bissell1 ,hi/oric ,orig9 ( ! ,bible1 #bgg-cdb1 & ,! ,p5tateu*1 its ,au?or%ip & ,/ructure2 ,b>tlett1 ,s\rces ( ,hi/ory 9 ! ,p5tateu*1 #ahj-baf1 & ,! ,v]acity ( ! ,hexateu*2 ,murray1 ,orig9 & ,gr[? ( ! ,psalms1 #eh2 ,payne-,smi?1 9 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #c3 no4 #ae2 ,ed]%eim1 ,prophecy & ,hi/ory2 ,kurtz1 ,hi/4 ,old ,cov5ant1 #a3df2 ,p][ne1 9 ,contemp4 ,rev41 ,jan4 & ,feb4 #ahhh2 ,*amb]s1 ,moses & 8 ,rec5t ,critics2 ,t]ry1 ,moses & ! ,prophets2 ,davis1 ,diction>y ( ! ,bible1 art43 ,p5tateu*2 ,willis ,j4 ,bee*]1 ,! ,prophets & ! ,promise2 ,orr1 ,problem ( ! ,o4 ,t41 #cbf-cbi4 ,,ii4 ,cr$ibility ( ! ,writ]s ( ! ,scriptures4 ,we %all attempt to prove ?is only ( ! writ]s ( ! gospels2 = if !y are cr$ible witnesses1 ! cr$ibility ( ! ,old ,te/am5t1 to :i* !y bore te/imony1 foll[s z a matt] ( c\rse4 #a4 ,!y are capable or compet5t witnesses1--t is1 !y possess$ actual k ) reg>d to ! facts !y pr(ess$ to relate4 7a7 ,!y _h opportunities ( obs]vation & inquiry4 7b7 ,!y 7 m5 ( sobriety & disc]nm5t1 & c\ld n h be5 !mselves deceiv$4 7c7 ,_! circum/ances 7 su* z to impress deeply ^u _! m9ds ! ev5ts ( :i* !y 7 witnesses4 #b4 ,!y are hone/ witnesses4 ,?is is evid5t :5 we consid] t3 7a7 ,_! te/imony imp]il$ all _! worldly int]e/s4 7b7 ,! moral elevation ( _! writ+s1 & _! manife/ rev]5ce = tru? & con/ant inculcation ( x1 %[ t !y 7 n wilful deceiv]s1 b good m54 7c7 ,!re are m9or indications ( ! hone/y ( ^! writ]s 9 ! circum/antiality ( _! /ory1 9 ! abs5ce ( any expectation t _! n>ratives w\ld be que/ion$1 9 _! fre$om f all disposition to scre5 !mselves or ! apo/les f c5sure4 ,less+ says t ,hom] nev] calls ,hel5 beautiful1 b he gives ! read] an impression ( h] surpass+ lovel9ess by portray+ ! effect produc$ by h] pres5ce4 ,s ! evangeli/s d n describe ,jesus' appe>ance or "*1 b lead u to conceive ! cause t c\ld produce su* effects4 ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #gg--8,pilate1 ,caiaphas1 ,h]od1 ,judas1 are n abus$1--!y are photograph$4 ,! s9 ( a ,judas & a ,pet] is told ) equal simplicity4 ,su* fairness1 :]ev] y f9d x1 belongs to a tru/wor?y witness40 #c4 ,! writ+s ( ! evangeli/s mutually support ea* o!r4 ,we argue _! cr$ibility ^u ! gr\nd ( _! numb] & ( ! consi/5cy ( _! te/imony4 ,:ile !re is en\gh ( discrepancy to %[ t !re has be5 no collusion betwe5 !m1 !re is concurr5ce en\gh to make ! falsehood ( !m all inf9itely improbable4 ,f\r po9ts "u ?is head des]ve m5tion3 7a7 ,! evangeli/s are indep5d5t witnesses4 ,?is is suffici5tly %[n by ! futility ( ! attempts to prove t any "o ( !m has abridg$ or transcrib$ ano!r4 7b7 ,! discrepancies betwe5 !m are none ( !m irreconcilable ) ! tru? ( ! record$ facts1 b only pres5t ^? facts 9 new lights or ) additional detail4 7c7 ,t ^! witnesses 7 fri5ds ( ,*ri/ does n less5 ! value ( _! unit$ te/imony1 s9ce !y foll[$ ,*ri/ only because !y 7 conv9c$ t ^! facts 7 true4 7d7 ,:ile "o witness to ! facts ( ,*ri/ianity might e/abli% its tru?1 ! comb9$ evid5ce ( f\r witnesses gives u a w>rant = fai? 9 ! facts ( ! gospel su* z we possess = no o!r facts 9 anci5t hi/ory :atsoev]4 ,! same rule :i* w\ld refuse belief 9 ! ev5ts record$ 9 ! gospels 8w\ld ?r[ d\bt on any ev5t 9 hi/ory40 ,no man does or c write 8 own signature twice precisely alike4 ,:5 two signatures1 !re=e1 purport+ to be writt5 by ! same p]son1 are precisely alike1 x is safe to conclude t "o ( !m is a =g]y4 ,comp>e ! comb9$ te/imony ( ! evangeli/s ) ! comb9$ te/imony ( our five s5ses4 8,let u assume10 says ,dr4 ,c4 ,e4 ,rid]1 8t ! *ances ( deception are z "o to t5 :5 we use our eyes alone1 "o to tw5ty :5 we use our e>s alone1 & "o to =ty :5 we use our s5se ( t\* alone2 :at are ! *ances ( mi/ake :5 we use all ^! s5ses simultane\sly8 ,! true result is obta9$ by multiply+ ^! proportions toge!r4 ,?is gives "o to eight ?\s&40 #d4 ,! con=mity ( ! gospel te/imony ) exp]i5ce4 ,we h already %[n t1 grant+ ! fact ( s9 & ! ne$ ( an atte/$ revelation f ,god1 miracles c furni% no presumption aga9/ ! te/imony ( ^? :o record su* a revelation1 b1 z ess5tially belong+ to su* a revelation1 miracles may be prov$ by ! same k9d & degree ( evid5ce z is requir$ 9 pro( ( any o!r extraord9>y facts4 ,we may ass]t1 !n1 t 9 ! ,new ,te/am5t hi/ories !re is no record ( facts contr>y to exp]i5ce1 b only a record ( facts n witness$ 9 ord9>y exp]i5ce--( facts1 !re=e1 9 :i* we may believe1 if ! evid5ce 9 o!r respects is suffici5t4 #e4 ,co9cid5ce ( ?is te/imony ) collat]al facts & circum/ances4 ,"u ?is head we may ref] to 7a7 ! numb]less correspond5ces betwe5 ! n>ratives ( ! evangeli/s & contempor>y hi/ory2 7b7 ! failure ( e attempt ?us f> to %[ t ! sacr$ hi/ory is contradict$ by any s+le fact d]iv$ f o!r tru/wor?y s\rces2 7c7 ! inf9ite improbability t ?is m9ute & complete h>mony %\ld ev] h be5 secur$ 9 fictiti\s n>ratives4 #f4 ,conclusion f ! argum5t = ! cr$ibility ( ! writ]s ( ! gospels4 ,^! writ]s hav+ be5 prov$ to be cr$ible witnesses1 _! n>ratives1 includ+ ! acc\nts ( ! miracles & prophecies ( ,*ri/ & 8 apo/les1 mu/ be accept$ z true4 ,b ,god w\ld n "w miracles or reveal ! future to atte/ ! claims ( false tea*]s4 ,*ri/ & 8 apo/les mu/1 !re=e1 h be5 :at !y claim$ to be1 tea*]s s5t f ,god1 & _! doctr9e mu/ be :at !y claim$ x to be1 a revelation f ,god to m54 ,on ! :ole subject1 see ,ebr>d1 ,wiss5s*4 ,kritik d] evang4 ,ges*i*te2 ,gre5leaf1 ,te/imony ( ! ,evangeli/s1 #cj1 #ca2 ,/>kie on ,evid5ce1 #gcd2 ,:ately1 ,hi/oric ,d\bts z to ,napoleon ,buonap>te2 ,haley1 ,exam9ation ( ,alleg$ ,discrepancies2 ,smi?'s ,voyage & ,%ipwreck ( ,/4 ,paul2 ,paley1 ,horse ,paul92 ,birks1 9 ,/riv+s = ! ,fai?1 #cg-gb--8;,discrepancies are l ! slight div]sities ( ! diff]5t pictures ( ! /]eoscope40 ,r5an calls ! l& ( ,pale/9e a fif? gospel4 ,weiss contra/s ! ,apocryphal ,gospels1 :]e !re is no hi/orical sett+ & all is 9 ! air1 ) ! evangeli/s1 :]e "t & place are always /at$4 ,no mod]n apologi/ has /at$ ! argum5t = ! cr$ibility ( ! ,new ,te/am5t ) great] cle>ness & =ce ?an ,paley1--,evid5ces1 *apt]s #h & #aj--8,no hi/orical fact is m c]ta9 ?an t ! orig9al propagators ( ! gospel volunt>ily subject$ !mselves to lives ( fatigue1 dang]1 & suff]+1 9 ! prosecution ( _! und]tak+4 ,! nature ( ! und]tak+1 ! "* ( ! p]sons employ$ 9 x1 ! opposition ( _! t5ets to ! fix$ expectations ( ! c\ntry 9 :i* !y at fir/ advanc$ !m1 _! undissembl$ condemnation ( ! religion ( all o!r c\ntries1 _! total want ( p[]1 au?ority1 or =ce1 r5d] x 9 ! highe/ degree probable t ?is mu/ h be5 ! case4 8,! probability is increas$ by :at we "k ( ! fate ( ! ,f\nd] ( ! in/itution1 :o 0 put to dea? = 8 attempt1 & by :at we also "k ( ! cruel treatm5t ( ! conv]ts to ! in/itution )9 ?irty ye>s aft] its comm5cem5t--bo? :i* po9ts are atte/$ by hea!n writ]s1 &1 be+ once admitt$1 leave x v incr$ible t ! primitive emiss>ies ( ! religion :o ex]cis$ _! m9i/ry fir/ among/ ! p :o _h de/roy$ _! ,ma/]1 & aft]w>ds among/ ^? :o p]secut$ _! conv]ts1 %\ld !mselves escape ) impunity or pursue _! purpose 9 ease & safety4 8,?is probability1 ?us su/a9$ by =eign te/imony1 is advanc$1 ,i ?9k1 to hi/orical c]ta9ty by ! evid5ce ( our own books1 by ! acc\nts ( a writ] :o 0 ! companion ( ! p]sons ^: suff]+s he relates1 by ! lett]s ( ! p]sons !mselves1 by pr$ictions ( p]secutions1 ascrib$ to ! ,f\nd] ( ! religion1 :i* pr$ictions w\ld n h be5 ins]t$ 9 ?is hi/ory1 mu* less1 /udi\sly dwelt ^u1 if !y _h n accord$ ) ! ev5t1 & :i*1 ev5 if falsely ascrib$ to him1 c\ld only h be5 s ascrib$ because ! ev5t sugge/$ !m2 la/ly1 by incessant exhortations to =titude & pati5ce1 & by an e>ne/ness1 repetition & urg5cy ^u ! subject :i* 7 unlikely to h appe>$1 if !re _h n be51 at ! "t1 "s extraord9>y call = ! ex]cise ( su* virtues4 ,x is also made out1 ,i ?9k1 ) suffici5t evid5ce1 t bo? ! tea*]s & conv]ts ( ! religion1 9 consequ5ce ( _! new pr(ession1 took up a new c\rse ( life & conduct4 8,! next great "q is1 :at !y did ?is =4 ,x 0 = a miracul\s /ory ( "s k9d1 s9ce = ! pro( t ,jesus ( ,naz>e? ought to be receiv$ z ! ,messiah1 or z a mess5g] = ,god1 !y nei!r _h nor c\ld h any?+ b miracles to /& ^u4444 ,if ?is be s1 ! religion mu/ be true4 ,^! m5 c\ld n be deceiv]s4 ,by only n be>+ te/imony1 !y might h avoid$ all ^! suff]+s & liv$ quietly4 ,w\ld m5 9 su* circum/ances pret5d to h se5 :at !y nev] saw1 ass]t facts :i* !y _h no k (1 g ab\t ly+ to tea* virtue1 & ?\gh n only conv9c$ ( ,*ri/'s be+ an impo/or1 b hav+ se5 ! success ( 8 impo/ure 9 8 crucifixion1 yet p]si/ 9 c>ry+ x on1 & s p]si/ z to br+ ^u !mselves1 = no?+1 & ) a full k ( ! consequ5ces1 enmity & hatr$1 dang] & dea?80 ,^? :o ma9ta9 ?is1 moreov]1 require u to believe t ! ,scripture writ]s 7 8villa9s = no end b to tea* hone/y1 & m>tyrs )\t ! lea/ prospect ( honor or advantage40 ,impo/ure mu/ h a motive4 ,! self-devotion ( ! apo/les is ! /ronge/ evid5ce ( _! tru?1 = ev5 ,hume decl>es t 8we _c make use ( a m conv9c+ argum5t 9 pro( ( hone/y ?an to prove t ! actions ascrib$ to any p]sons are contr>y to ! c\rse ( nature1 & t no human motives1 9 su* circum/ances1 c\ld ev] induce !m to su* conduct40 ,,iii4 ,! ,sup]natural ,"* ( ! ,scripture ,tea*+4 #a4 ,scripture tea*+ 9 g5]al4 ,a4 ,! ,bible is ! "w ( "o m9d4 7a7 ,9 spite ( its v>iety ( au?or%ip & ! va/ sep>ation ( its writ]s f "o ano!r 9 po9t ( "t1 !re is a unity ( subject1 _s1 & aim ?r\gh\t ! :ole4 ,we "h beg9 a new dep>tm5t ( ,*ri/ian evid5ces4 ,we h ?us f> only adduc$ ext]nal evid5ce4 ,we n[ turn our att5tion to int]nal evid5ce4 ,! relation ( ext]nal to int]nal evid5ce seems to be sugge/$ 9 ,*ri/'s two que/ions 9 ,m>k #h3bg1 #bi--8,:o d m5 say t ,i am8444 :o say ye t ,i am80 ,! unity 9 v>iety display$ 9 ,scripture is "o ( ! *ief int]nal evid5ces4 ,?is unity is indicat$ 9 our ^w 8,bible10 9 ! s+ul> numb]4 ,yet ! orig9al ^w 0 8,biblia10 a plural numb]4 ,! _w has come to see a unity 9 :at 7 once scatt]$ fragm5ts3 ! _m 8,biblia0 h become "o 8,bible40 ,9 "o s5se ,r4 ,w4 ,em]son's cont5tion is true3 8,! ,bible is n a book1--x is a lit]ature40 ,b we may also say1 & ) equal tru?3 8,! ,bible is n simply a collection ( books1--x is a book40 ,! ,bible is made up ( sixty-six books1 by =ty writ]s1 ( all ranks1--%eph]ds1 fi%]m51 prie/s1 w>riors1 /atesm51 k+s1--compos+ _! works at int]vals ?r\gh a p]iod ( sev5te5 c5turies4 ,evid5tly no collusion betwe5 !m is possible4 ,scepticism t5ds ev] to ascribe to ! ,scriptures great] v>iety ( au?or%ip & date1 b all ?is only increases ! wond] ( ! ,bible's unity4 ,if unity 9 a half doz5 writ]s is rem>kable1 9 =ty x is a/\nd+4 8,! _m div]se in/rum5ts ( ?is or*e/ra play "o p]fect tune3 h5ce we feel t !y are l$ by "o ma/] & compos]40 ,yet x takes ! same ,_s :o inspir$ ! ,bible to tea* its unity4 ,! union is n an ext]nal or sup]ficial "o1 b "o t is int]nal & spiritual4 7b7 ,n "o moral or religi\s utt]ance ( all ^! writ]s has be5 contradict$ or sup]s$$ by ! utt]ances ( ^? :o h come lat]1 b all toge!r con/itute a consi/5t sy/em4 ,"h we mu/ di/+ui% betwe5 ! ext]nal =m & ! moral & religi\s sub/ance4 ,jesus decl>es 9 ,mat4 #e3ba1 #bb1 #bg1 #bh1 #cc1 #cd1 #ch1 #ci1 #dc1 #dd1 8,ye h he>d t x 0 said to !m ( old "t 444 b ,i say unto y10 & !n he seems at fir/ sight to abrogate c]ta9 orig9al comm&s4 ,b he also decl>es 9 ?is connection1 ,mat4 #e3ag1 #ah--8,?9k n ,i am come to de/roy ! law or ! prophets3 ,i came n to de/roy b to fulfil4 ,= v]ily ,i say unto y1 ,till heav5 & e>? pass away1 "o jot or "o tittle %all 9 no wise pass away f ! law1 till all ?+s be accompli%$40 ,*ri/'s new comm&m5ts only br+ out ! inn] mean+ ( ! old4 ,he fulfils !m n 9 _! lit]al =m b 9 _! ess5tial _s4 ,s ! ,new ,te/am5t completes ! revelation ( ! ,old ,te/am5t & makes ! ,bible a p]fect unity4 ,9 ?is unity ! ,bible /&s alone4 ,h9du1 ,p]sian1 & ,*9ese religi\s books conta9 no consi/5t sy/em ( fai?4 ,!re is progress 9 revelation f ! e>li] to ! lat] books ( ! ,bible1 b ?is is n progress ?r\gh successive /eps ( falsehood2 x is r progress f a less to a m cle> & full unfold+ ( ! tru?4 ,! :ole tru? lay g]m9ally 9 ! protevangelium utt]$ to our fir/ p>5ts 7,g54 #c3ae--! se$ ( ! woman %\ld bruise ! s]p5t's head74 7c7 ,ea* ( ^! writ+s1 :e!r e>ly or late1 has repres5t$ moral & religi\s ideas greatly 9 advance ( ! age 9 :i* x has appe>$1 & ^! ideas /ill lead ! _w4 ,all our ideas ( progress1 ) all ! =w>d-look+ _s ( mod]n ,*ri/5dom1 are due to ,scripture4 ,! classic nations _h no su* ideas & no su* _s1 except z !y caught !m f ! ,hebrews4 ,virgil's prophecy1 9 8 f\r? ,eclogue1 ( a com+ virg9 & ( ! reign ( ,saturn & ( ! return ( ! gold5 age1 0 only ! e*o ( ! ,sibyll9e books & ( ! hope ( a ,r$eem] ) :i* ! ,jews _h leav5$ ! :ole ,roman _w2 see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,! ,great ,poets & _! ,!ology1 #id-if4 7d7 ,x is impossible to acc\nt = ?is unity )\t suppos+ su* a sup]natural sugge/ion & control t ! ,bible1 :ile 9 its v>i\s p>ts writt5 by human ag5ts1 is yet equally ! "w ( a sup]human intellig5ce4 ,we may contra/ ) ! h>mony betwe5 ! diff]5t ,scripture writ]s ! contradictions & refutations :i* foll[ m]ely human philosophies--e4 g41 ! ,hegelian idealism & ! ,sp5c]ian mat]ialism4 ,hegel is 8a "n to swe> at1 z well z to swe> by40 ,dr4 ,/irl+1 9 8 ,secret ( ,hegel1 8kept all ! secret to himself1 if he ev] knew x40 ,a c]ta9 ,fr5*man once ask$ ,hegel if he c\ld n ga!r up & express 8 philosophy 9 "o s5t5ce = him4 8,no10 ,hegel repli$1 8at lea/ n 9 ,fr5*40 ,if ,talleyr&'s maxim be true t :atev] is n intelligible is n ,fr5*1 ,hegel's answ] 0 a correct "o4 ,hegel said ( 8 disciples3 8,!re is only "o man liv+ :o und]/&s me1 & he does n40 ,goes*el1 ,gabl]1 ,daub1 ,m>he9ecke1 ,erdmann1 are ,hegel's "r w+1 or or?odox repres5tatives & foll[]s 9 !ology2 see ,/]rett1 ,hegel's ,philosophy ( ,religion4 ,hegel is foll[$ by ,alex&] & ,bradley 9 ,engl&1 b is oppos$ by ,se? & ,s*ill]4 ,upton1 ,hibb]t ,lectures1 #bgi-cjj1 gives a valuable e/imate ( 8 position & influ5ce3 ,hegel is all ?\ght & no w4 ,pray] has no effect on ,god1--x is a purely psy*ological ph5om5on4 ,!re is no free-w1 & man's s9 z mu* z man's hol9ess is a manife/ation ( ! ,et]nal4 ,evolution is a fact1 b x is only fatali/ic evolution4 ,hegel not)/&+ did great s]vice by sub/itut+ k ( reality = ! oppressive ,kantian relativity1 & by bani%+ ! old notion ( matt] z a my/]i\s sub/ance :olly unlike & incompatible ) ! prop]ties ( m9d4 ,he did great s]vice also by %[+ t ! int]actions ( matt] & m9d are explicable only by ! pres5ce ( ! ,absolute ,:ole 9 e "p1 ?\gh he err$ greatly by c>ry+ t idea ( ! unity ( ,god & man beyond its prop] limits1 & by d5y+ t ,god has giv5 to ! w ( man any p[] to put itself into antagonism to ,8 ,w4 ,hegel did great s]vice by %[+ t we _c "k ev5 ! "p )\t kn[+ ! :ole1 b he err$ 9 tea*+1 z ,t4 ,h4 ,gre5 did1 t ! relations con/itute ! reality ( ! ?+4 ,he deprives bo? physical & psy*ical exi/5ces ( t degree ( selfhood or indep5d5t reality :i* is ess5tial to bo? sci5ce & religion4 ,we want real =ce1 & n ! m]e idea ( =ce2 real w1 & n m]e ?\ght4 ,b4 ,?is "o m9d t made ! ,bible is ! same m9d t made ! s\l1 = ! ,bible is div9ely adapt$ to ! s\l1 7a7 ,x %[s complete acqua9tance ) ! s\l4 ,! ,bible addresses all p>ts ( man's nature4 ,!re are ,law & ,epi/les = man's reason2 ,psalms & ,gospels = 8 affections2 ,prophets & ,revelations = 8 imag9ation4 ,h5ce ! popul>ity ( ! ,scriptures4 ,_! v>iety holds m54 ,! ,bible has become int]wov5 into mod]n life4 ,law1 lit]ature1 art1 all %[ its m\ld+ influ5ce4 7b7 ,x judges ! s\l--contradict+ its passions1 reveal+ its guilt1 & humbl+ its pride4 ,no product ( m]e human nature c\ld ?us look d[n ^u human nature & condemn x4 ,! ,bible speaks to u f a high] level4 ,! ,sam>itan woman's words apply to ! :ole compass ( div9e revelation2 x tells u all ?+s t ev] we did 7,john #d3bi74 ,! ,brahm9 decl>$ t ,romans #a1 ) its description ( hea!n vices1 mu/ h be5 =g$ aft] ! mission>ies came to ,india4 7c7 ,x meets ! deepe/ ne$s ( ! s\l--by solutions ( its problems1 disclosures ( ,god's "*1 pres5tations ( ! way ( p>don1 consolations & promises = life & dea?4 ,nei!r ,socrates nor ,s5eca sets =? ! nature1 orig9 & consequ5ces ( s9 z committ$ aga9/ ! hol9ess ( ,god1 nor d !y po9t out ! way ( p>don & r5ewal4 ,! ,bible tea*es u :at nature _c1 viz43 ,god's creator%ip1 ! orig9 ( evil1 ! me?od ( re/oration1 ! c]ta9ty ( a future /ate1 & ! pr9ciple ( rew>ds & puni%m5ts !re4 7d7 ,yet x is sil5t ^u _m que/ions = :i* writ+s ( m]ely human orig9 seek fir/ to provide solutions4 ,comp>e ! acc\nt ( ,*ri/'s infancy 9 ! gospels ) ! fables ( ! ,apocryphal ,new ,te/am5t2 comp>e ! scant utt]ances ( ,scripture ) reg>d to ! future /ate ) ,mohamm$'s & ,sw$5borg's revelations ( ,p>adise4 ,see ,alex&] ,mc,laren's s]mon on ,! ,sil5ce ( ,scripture1 9 8 book entitl$3 ,*ri/ 9 ! ,he>t1 #aca-ada4 7e7 ,!re are inf9ite dep?s & inexhau/ible rea*es ( mean+ 9 ,scripture1 :i* diff]5ce x f all o!r books1 & :i* compel u to believe t its au?or mu/ be div9e4 ,sir ,walt] ,scott1 on 8 dea? b$3 8,br+ me ! ,book60 8,:at book80 said ,lockh>t1 8 son-9-law4 8,!re is b "o book60 said ! dy+ man4 ,rville concludes an ,essay 9 ! ,revue des deux ,mondes 7#ahfd73 8,"o day ! "q 0 />t$1 9 an assembly1 :at book a man condemn$ to lifelong imprisonm5t1 & to :om b "o book w\ld be p]mitt$1 _h bett] take into 8 cell ) him4 ,! company consi/$ ( ,ca?olics1 ,prote/ants1 philosoph]s & ev5 mat]iali/s1 b all agre$ t _! *oice w\ld fall only on ! ,bible40 ,on ! :ole subject1 see ,g>bett1 ,god's ,^w ,writt51 #c-ef2 ,lu?>dt1 ,sav+ ,tru?s1 #baj2 ,rog]s1 ,sup]human ,orig9 ( ,bible1 #aee-aha2 ,w4 ,l4 ,alex&]1 ,connection & ,h>mony ( ,o4 ,t4 & ,n4 ,t42 ,/anley ,lea!s1 ,/ructure ( ! ,o4 ,t42 ,b]n>d1 ,progress ( ,doctr9e 9 ! ,n4 ,t42 ,ra9y1 ,deliv]y & ,developm5t ( ,doctr9e2 ,titcomb1 9 ,/riv+s = ! ,fai?2 ,imm]1 ,h]m5eutics1 #ia2 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #d3 no4 #bc2 #e3 no4 #bh2 #f3 no4 #ca2 ,lee on ,inspiration1 #bf-cb4 #b4 ,moral ,sy/em ( ! ,new ,te/am5t4 ,! p]fection ( ?is sy/em is g5]ally conc$$4 ,all w admit t x greatly surpasses any o!r sy/em kn[n among m54 ,among its di/+ui%+ *>act]i/ics may be m5tion$3 7a7 ,its compreh5siv5ess1--includ+ all human duties 9 its code1 ev5 ! mo/ g5]ally misund]/ood & neglect$1 :ile x p]mits no vice :atsoev]4 ,buddhism reg>ds family life z s9ful4 ,suicide 0 comm5d$ by _m anci5t philosoph]s4 ,among ! ,sp>tans to /eal 0 praisewor?y1--only to be caught /eal+ 0 crim9al4 ,classic times despis$ humility4 ,?omas ,pa9e said t ,*ri/ianity cultivat$ 8! _s ( a spaniel10 & ,john ,/u>t ,mill ass]t$ t ,*ri/ ignor$ duty to ! /ate4 ,yet ,pet] urges ,*ri/ians to add to _! fai? manl9ess1 c\rage1 h]oism 7#b ,pet4 #a3e--8;9 y\r fai? supply virtue071 & ,paul decl>es ! /ate to be ,god's ord9ance 7,rom4 #ac3a--8,let e s\l be 9 subjection to ! high] p[]s3 = !re is no p[] b ( ,god2 & ! p[]s t be are orda9$ ( ,god074 ,patriotic def5ce ( a nation's unity & fre$om has always f\nd its *ief incitem5t & gr\nd 9 ^! injunctions ( ,scripture4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,*ri/ian e?ics d n conta9 a p>ticle ( *aff1--all is pure :eat40 7b7 ,its spirituality1--accept+ no m]ely ext]nal con=mity to "r precepts1 b judg+ all action by ! ?\ghts & motives f :i* x spr+s4 ,! sup]ficiality ( hea!n morals is well illu/rat$ by ! treatm5t ( ! corpse ( a prie/ 9 ,siam3 ! body is cov]$ ) gold leaf1 & !n is left to rot & %9e4 ,hea!nism divorces religion f e?ics4 ,ext]nal & c]emonial obs]vances take ! place ( purity ( he>t4 ,! ,s]mon on ! ,m\nt on ! o!r h& pron\nces bless+ only ^u inw>d /ates ( ! s\l4 ,ps4 #ea3f--8;,behold1 ?\ desire/ tru? 9 ! inw>d p>ts1 & 9 ! hidd5 "p ?\ wilt make me to "k wisdom02 ,micah #f3h--8:at do? ,jehovah require ( !e1 b to d ju/ly1 & to love k9dness1 & to walk humbly ) ?y ,god80 7c7 ,its simplicity1--inculcat+ pr9ciples r ?an impos+ rules2 r$uc+ ^! pr9ciples to an organic sy/em2 & connect+ ?is sy/em ) religion by summ+ up all human duty 9 ! "o comm& ( love to ,god & man4 ,*ri/ianity pres5ts no ext5sive code ( rules1 l t ( ! ,ph>isees or ( ! ,jesuits4 ,su* codes break d[n ( _! own weight4 ,! laws ( ! ,/ate ( ,new ,york alone con/itute a libr>y ( !mselves1 :i* only ! tra9$ lawy] c ma/]4 ,x is said t ,mohamm$anism has record$ sixty-five ?\s& special in/ances 9 :i* ! read] is direct$ to d "r4 ,x is ! m]it ( ,jesus' sy/em t all its requisitions are r$uc$ to unity4 ,m>k #ab3bi-ca--8;,he>1 ,o ,israel2 ,! ,"l our ,god1 ! ,"l is "o3 & ?\ %alt love ! ,"l ?y ,god ) all ?y he>t1 & ) all ?y s\l1 & ) all ?y m9d1 & ) all ?y /r5g?4 ,! second is ?is3 ,?\ %alt love ?y neighbor z ?yself4 ,!re is none o!r comm&m5t great] ?an ^!40 ,w5dt1 ,tea*+ ( ,jesus1 #b3chd-had1 calls att5tion to ! inn] unity ( ,jesus' tea*+4 ,! doctr9e t ,god is a lov+ ,fa!r is appli$ ) unsw]v+ consi/5cy4 ,jesus confirm$ :atev] 0 true 9 ! ,o4 ,t41 & he set aside ! unwor?y4 ,he taught n s mu* ab\t ,god1 z ab\t ! k+dom ( ,god1 & ab\t ! ideal fell[%ip betwe5 ,god & m54 ,morality 0 ! necess>y & natural expression ( religion4 ,9 ,*ri/ tea*+ & life 7 p]fectly bl5d$4 ,he 0 ! repres5tative ( ! religion :i* he taught4 7d7 ,its practicality1--exemplify+ its precepts 9 ! life ( ,jesus ,*ri/2 &1 :ile x decl>es man's depravity & inability 9 8 own /r5g? to keep ! law1 furni%+ motives to ob$i5ce1 & ! div9e aid ( ! ,holy ,_s to make ?is ob$i5ce possible4 ,revelation has two sides3 ,moral law1 & provision = fulfill+ ! moral law t has be5 brok54 ,hea!n sy/ems c incite to tempor>y re=mations1 & !y c t]rify ) fe>s ( retribution4 ,b only ,god's reg5]at+ grace c make ! tree good1 9 su* a way t its fruit w be good also 7,mat4 #ab3cc74 ,!re is a diff]5ce betwe5 t\*+ ! p5dulum ( ! clock & w9d+ x up1--! =m] may set x tempor>ily sw++1 b only ! latt] secures its regul> & p]man5t motion4 ,! moral sy/em ( ! ,n4 ,t4 is n simply law1--x is also grace3 ,john #a3ag--8! law 0 giv5 ?r\gh ,moses2 grace & tru? came ?r\gh ,jesus ,*ri/40 ,dr4 ,william ,a%more's tract repres5ts a ,*9aman 9 a pit4 ,confucius looks into ! pit & says3 8,if y _h done z ,i told y1 y w\ld nev] h gott5 940 ,buddha looks into ! pit & says3 8,if y 7 up "h ,i w\ld %[ y :at to d40 ,s bo? ,confucius & ,buddha pass on4 ,b ,jesus leaps d[n into ! pit & helps ! poor ,*9aman out4 ,at ! ,p>liam5t ( ,religions 9 ,*icago !re 7 _m ideals ( life prop\nd$1 b no religion except ,*ri/ianity attempt$ to %[ t !re 0 any p[] giv5 to realize ^! ideals4 ,:5 ,joseph ,cook *all5g$ ! prie/s ( ! anci5t religions to answ] ,lady ,macbe?'s "q3 8,h[ cleanse ?is r$ "r h&80 ! prie/s 7 dumb4 ,b ,*ri/ianity decl>es t 8! blood ( ,jesus 8 ,son cleanse? u f all s90 7#a ,john #a3g74 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 ,*ri/ianity diff]s f all o!r religions 9 be+ 7#a7 a hi/orical religion2 7#b7 9 turn+ ab/ract law into a p]son to be lov$2 7#c7 9 furni%+ a demon/ration ( ,god's love 9 ,*ri/2 7#d7 9 provid+ atonem5t = s9 & =giv5ess = ! s9n]2 7#e7 9 giv+ a p[] to fulfil ! law & sanctify ! life4 ,b[ne1 ,philos4 ( ,!ism1 #bdi--8;,*ri/ianity1 by mak+ ! moral law ! expression ( a holy ,w1 br\ght t law out ( its imp]sonal ab/raction1 & assur$ its ultimate triumph4 ,moral pr9ciples may be :at !y 7 be=e1 b moral practice is =ev] diff]5t4 ,ev5 ! e>? itself has ano!r look1 n[ t x has heav5 above x40 ,frances ,p[] ,cobbe1 ,life1 #ib--8,! a*ievem5t ( ,*ri/ianity 0 n ! inculcation ( a new1 /ill less ( a sy/ematic1 morality2 b ! introduction ( a new _s into morality2 z ,*ri/ himself said1 a leav5 into ! lump40 ,we may ju/ly argue t a moral sy/em s pure & p]fect1 s9ce x surpasses all human p[]s ( inv5tion & runs c\nt] to m5's natural ta/es & passions1 mu/ h _h a sup]natural1 & if a sup]natural1 !n a div9e1 orig94 ,hea!n sy/ems ( morality are 9 g5]al defective1 9 t !y furni% = man's moral action no suffici5t example1 rule1 motive1 or end4 ,!y _c d ?is1 = ! reason t !y practically id5tify ,god ) nature1 & "k ( no cle> revelation ( 8 holy w4 ,man is left to ! law ( 8 own be+1 & s9ce he is n conceiv$ ( z :olly responsible & free1 ! l[] impulses are all[$ sway z well z ! high]1 & selfi%ness is n reg>d$ z s94 ,z hea!ndom does n recognize man's depravity1 s x does n recognize 8 dep5d5ce ^u div9e grace1 & its virtue is self-righte\sness4 ,hea!nism is man's va9 ef=t to lift himself to ,god2 ,*ri/ianity is ,god's com+ d[n to man to save him2 see ,gunsaulus1 ,transfig4 ( ,*ri/1 #aa1 #ab4 ,m>t9eau1 #a3ae1 #af1 calls att5tion to ! diff]5ce betwe5 ! physiological e?ics ( hea!ndom & ! psy*ological e?ics ( ,*ri/ianity4 ,physiological e?ics beg9s ) nature2 &1 f9d+ 9 nature ! uni=m rule ( necessity & ! op]ation ( cause & effect1 x comes at la/ to man & applies ! same rule to him1 ?us ext+ui%+ all fai? 9 p]sonality1 fre$om1 responsibility1 s9 & guilt4 ,psy*ological e?ics1 on ! contr>y1 wisely beg9s ) :at we "k be/1 ) man2 & f9d+ 9 him free-w & a moral purpose1 x proce$s outw>d to nature & int]prets nature z ! manife/ation ( ! m9d & w ( ,god4 8,psy*ological e?ics are altoge!r peculi> to ,*ri/5dom4444 ,o!r sy/ems beg9 outside & reg>d ! s\l z a homog5e\s "p ( ! univ]se1 apply+ to ! s\l ! pr9ciple ( necessity t prevails outside ( x4444 ,9 ! ,*ri/ian religion1 on ! o!r h&1 ! int]e/1 ! my/]y ( ! _w are conc5trat$ 9 human nature4444 ,! s5se ( s9--a s5tim5t t left no trace 9 ,a!ns--involves a consci\sness ( p]sonal ali5ation f ! ,supreme ,goodness2 ! aspiration aft] hol9ess directs itself to a union ( affection & w ) ! s\rce ( all ,p]fection2 ! ag5cy = trans=m+ m5 f _! old e/rangem5t to new reconciliation is a ,p]son1 9 :om ! div9e & human hi/orically bl5d2 & ! sanctify+ ,_s by :i* !y are su/a9$ at ! height ( _! pur] life is a liv+ l9k ( communion betwe5 _! m9ds & ! ,s\l ( s\ls4444 ,s ,nature1 to ! ,*ri/ian consci\sness1 sank into ! accid5tal & ! neutral40 ,measur+ ourselves by human /&>ds1 we n\ri% pride2 measur+ ourselves by div9e /&>ds1 we n\ri% humility4 ,hea!n nations1 id5tify+ ,god ) nature or ) man1 are unprogressive4 ,! flat ar*itecture ( ! ,p>!non1 ) its l9es p>allel to ! e>?1 is ! type ( hea!n religion2 ! aspir+ ar*es ( ! ,go?ic ca!dral symbolize ,*ri/ianity4 ,/]rett1 ,/udies 9 ,hegel1 #cc1 says t ,hegel *>act]iz$ ! ,*9ese religion z t ( ,measure1 or temp]ate conduct2 ,brahmanism z t ( ,phantasy1 or inebriate dream-life2 ,buddhism z t ( ,self-involvem5t2 t ( ,egypt z ! imbrut$ religion ( ,enigma1 symboliz$ by ! ,sphynx2 t ( ,greece1 z ! religion ( ,beauty2 ! ,jewi% z t ( ,sublimity2 & ,*ri/ianity z ! ,absolute religion1 ! fully reveal$ religion ( tru? & fre$om4 ,9 all ?is ,hegel entirely fails to grasp ! elem5ts ( ,w1 ,hol9ess1 ,love1 ,life1 :i* *>act]ize ,judaism & ,*ri/ianity1 & di/+ui% !m f all o!r religions4 ,r4 ,h4 ,hutton3 8,judaism taught u t ,nature mu/ be int]pret$ by our k ( ,god1 n ,god by our k ( ,nature40 ,lyman ,abbott3 8,*ri/ianity is n a new life1 b a new p[]2 n a summons to a new life1 b an (f] ( new life2 n a renactm5t ( ! old law1 b a p[] ( ,god unto salvation2 n love to ,god & man1 b ,*ri/'s message t ,god loves u1 & w help u to ! life ( love40 ,beys*lag1 ,n4 ,t4 ,!ology1 #e1 #f--8;,*ri/ianity po/ulates an op5+ ( ! he>t ( ! et]nal ,god to ! he>t ( man com+ to meet him4 ,hea!ndom %[s u ! he>t ( man blund]+ly grasp+ ! hem ( ,god's g>m5t1 & mi/ak+ ,nature1 8 maje/ic raim5t1 = himself4 ,only 9 ! ,bible does man press beyond ,god's ext]nal manife/ations to ,god himself40 ,see ,wuttke1 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics1 #a3cg-agc2 ,port]1 9 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #d3 no4 #ai1 pp4 #cc-fd3 ,blackie1 ,f\r ,phases ( ,morals2 ,fai?s ( ! ,_w 7,/4 ,giles ,lectures1 second s]ies72 ,j4 ,f4 ,cl>ke1 ,t5 ,great ,religions1 #b3bhj-cag2 ,g>bett1 ,dogmatic ,fai?2 ,f>r>1 ,witness ( ,hi/ory to ,*ri/1 #acd1 & ,seek]s aft] ,god1 #aha1 #ahb1 #cbj2 ,curtis on ,inspiration1 #bhh4 ,= d5ial ( ! all-compreh5sive "* ( ,*ri/ian ,morality1 see ,john ,/u>t ,mill1 on ,lib]ty2 p] contra1 see ,review ( ,mill1 9 ,!ol4 ,eclectic1 #f3ejh-eab2 ,r[1 9 ,/riv+s = ! ,fai?1 pub4 by ,*ri/ian ,evid5ce ,society1 #aha-bbj2 also1 ,bampton ,lectures1 #ahgg3acj-agf2 ,fi%]1 ,beg9n+s ( ,*ri/ianity1 #bh-ch1 #agd4 ,9 contra/ ) ! ,*ri/ian sy/em ( morality ! defects ( hea!n sy/ems are s m>k$ & fundam5tal1 t !y con/itute a /rong corroborative evid5ce ( ! div9e orig9 ( ! ,scripture revelation4 ,we !re=e app5d c]ta9 facts & ref]5ces ) reg>d to p>ticul> hea!n sy/ems4 #a4 ,confucianism4 ,confucius 7,kung-fu-tse71 ,b4 ,c4 #eea-dgh1 contempor>y ) ,py?agoras & ,buddha4 ,socrates 0 born t5 ye>s aft] ,confucius di$4 ,m5cius 7#cga-bgh7 0 a disciple ( ,confucius4 ,ma!son1 9 ,fai?s ( ! ,_w 7,/4 ,giles ,lectures71 #gc-ajh1 claims t ,confucianism 0 8an attempt to sub/itute a morality = !ology40 ,legge1 h[ev]1 9 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #c3 no4 #ah1 %[s t ?is is a mi/ake4 ,confucius simply left religion :]e he f\nd x4 ,god1 or ,heav51 is wor%ip$ 9 ,*9a1 b only by ! ,emp]or4 ,*9ese religion is app>5tly a survival ( ! wor%ip ( ! patri>*al family4 ,! fa!r ( ! family 0 its only head & prie/4 ,9 ,*9a1 ?\gh ! family wid5$ into ! tribe1 & ! tribe into ! nation1 ! fa!r /ill reta9$ 8 sole au?ority1 &1 z ! fa!r ( 8 p1 ! ,emp]or alone (ficially (f]$ sacrifice to ,god4 ,betwe5 ,god & ! p ! gulf has s wid5$ t ! p may be said to h no practical k ( ,god or communication ) him4 ,dr4 ,w4 ,a4 ,p4 ,m>t93 8,confucianism has deg5]at$ into a pan!i/ic m$ley1 & r5d]s wor%ip to an imp]sonal #8anima mundi1' "u ! lead+ =ms ( visible nature40 ,dr4 ,william ,a%more1 private lett]3 8,! common p ( ,*9a h3 7#a7 ,ance/or-wor%ip1 & ! wor%ip ( deifi$ h]oes3 7#b7 ,geomancy1 or belief 9 ! controll+ p[] ( ! elem5ts ( nature2 b back ( ^!1 & ant$at+ !m1 is 7#c7 ! wor%ip ( ,heav5 & ,e>?1 or ,fa!r & ,"m1 a v anci5t dualism2 ?is belongs to ! common p also1 ?\gh once a ye> ! ,emp]or1 z a sort ( high-prie/ ( 8 p1 (f]s sacrifice on ! alt> ( ,heav52 9 ?is he acts alone4 #8,joss' is n a ,*9ese ^w at all4 ,x is ! corrupt$ =m ( ! ,portuguese ^w #8,deos4' ,! ^w #8pidg9' is simil>ly an attempt to say #8bus9ess' 7big-i-ness or bidg974 #8,joss-pidg9' !re=e means simply #8div9e s]vice1' or s]vice (f]$ to ,heav5 & ,e>?1 or to spirits ( any k9d1 good or bad4 ,!re are _m gods1 a ,que5 ( ,heav51 ,k+ ( ,hades1 ,god ( ,w>1 god ( lit]ature1 gods ( ! hills1 valleys1 /reams1 a goddess ( small-pox1 ( *ild-be>+1 & all ! v>i\s trades h _! gods4 ,! mo/ l(ty expression ! ,*9ese h is #8,heav51' or #8,supreme ,heav51' or #8,azure ,heav54' ,?is is ! surviv+ indication t 9 ! mo/ remote times !y _h k ( "o supreme1 intellig5t & p]sonal ,p[] :o rul$ ov] all40 ,mr4 ,yugoro ,*iba has %[n t ! ,*9ese classics p]mit sacrifice by all ! p4 ,b x /ill rema9s true t sacrifice to 8,supreme ,heav50 is practically conf9$ to ! ,emp]or1 :o l ! ,jewi% high-prie/ (f]s = 8 p once a ye>4 ,confucius did no?+ to put morality ^u a religi\s basis4 ,9 practice1 ! relations betwe5 man & man are ! only relations consid]$4 ,b5evol5ce1 righte\sness1 propriety1 wisdom1 s9c]ity1 are enjo9$1 b n a ^w is said ) reg>d to man's relations to ,god4 ,love to ,god is n only n comm&$--x is n ?\ght ( z possible4 ,?\gh man's be+ is !oretically an ord9ance ( ,god1 man is practically a law to himself4 ,! fir/ comm&m5t ( ,confucius is t ( filial piety4 ,b ?is includes wor%ip ( dead ance/ors1 & is s exagg]at$ z to bury f sight ! relat$ duties ( husb& to wife & ( p>5t to *ild4 ,confucius made x ! duty ( a son to slay 8 fa!r's murd]]1 j z ,moses insi/$ on a /rictly retaliatory p5alty = blood%$2 see ,j4 ,a4 ,f>r]1 ,primitive ,mann]s & ,cu/oms1 #hj4 ,he treat$ invisible & sup]ior be+s ) respect1 b held !m at a di/ance4 ,he recogniz$ ! 8,heav50 ( tradition2 b1 in/ead ( add+ to our k ( x1 he /ifl$ inquiry4 ,dr4 ,legge3 8,i h be5 read+ ,*9ese books = m ?an =ty ye>s1 & any g5]al requirem5t to love ,god1 or ! m5tion ( any "o z actually lov+ him1 has yet to come = ! fir/ "t "u my eye40 ,ezra ,abbot ass]ts t ,confucius gave ! gold5 rule 9 positive z well z negative =m2 see ,h>ris1 ,philos4 ,basis ( ,!ism1 #bbb4 ,?is h[ev] seems to be d5i$ by ,dr4 ,legge1 ,religions ( ,*9a1 #a-eh4 ,wu ,t+ ,fang1 =m] ,*9ese m9i/] to ,wa%+ton1 ass5ts to ! /atem5t t ,confucius gave ! gold5 rule only 9 its negative =m1 & he says ?is diff]5ce is ! diff]5ce betwe5 a passive & an aggressive civilization1 :i* la/ is !re=e dom9ant4 ,! gold5 rule1 z ,confucius gives x1 is3 8,d n unto o!rs t :i* y w\ld n !y %\ld d unto y40 ,comp>e ) ?is1 ,isocrates3 8,be to y\r p>5ts :at y w\ld h y\r *ildr5 be to y4444 ,d n to o!rs ! ?+s :i* make y angry :5 o!rs d !m to y02 ,h]odotus3 8,:at ,i puni% 9 ano!r man1 ,i w myself1 z f> z ,i c1 refra9 f02 ,ari/otle3 8,we %\ld behave t[>d our fri5ds z we %\ld wi% !m to behave t[>d u02 ,tobit1 #d3ae--8,:at ?\ hate/1 d to no "o02 ,philo3 8,:at "o hates to endure1 let him n d02 ,s5eca bids u 8give z we wi% to receive02 ,rabbi ,hillel3 8,:atsoev] is hateful to y1 d n to ano!r2 ?is is ! :ole law1 & all ! re/ is explanation40 ,broadus1 9 ,am4 ,com4 on ,mat!w1 #afa--8,! say+s ( ,confucius1 ,isocrates1 & ! ?ree ,jewi% tea*]s1 are m]ely negative2 t ( ,s5eca is conf9$ to giv+1 & t ( ,ari/otle to ! treatm5t ( fri5ds4 ,*ri/ lays d[n a rule = positive action1 & t t[>d all m540 ,he tea*es t ,i am b\nd to d to o!rs all t !y c\ld rightly desire me to d to !m4 ,! gold5 rule !re=e requires a supplem5t1 to %[ :at o!rs c rightly desire1 namely1 ,god's glory fir/1 & _! good z second & incid5tal !reto4 ,*ri/ianity furni%es ?is div9e & p]fect /&>d2 ,confucianism is defective 9 t x has no /&>d high] ?an human conv5tion4 ,:ile ,confucianism excludes poly!ism1 idolatry1 & deification ( vice1 x is a %all[ & tantaliz+ sy/em1 because x does n recognize ! h]$it>y corruption ( human nature1 or furni% any rem$y = moral evil except ! 8doctr9es ( ! sages40 8,! he>t ( man10 x says1 8is naturally p]fectly upright & correct40 ,s9 is simply 8a disease1 to be cur$ by self-discipl9e2 a debt1 to be cancel$ by m]itori\s acts2 an ignorance1 to be remov$ by /udy & contemplation40 ,see ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahhc3bib1 #bic2 ,n4 ,engl&]1 #ahhc3efe2 ,m>cus ,dods1 9 ,erasmus & o!r ,essays1 #bci4 #b4 ,,! ,,indian ,,sy/ems4 ,brahmanism1 z express$ 9 ! ,v$as1 dates back to #ajjj-aejj ,b4 ,c4 ,z ,caird 79 ,fai?s ( ! ,_w1 ,/4 ,giles ,lectures1 lecture #a7 has %[n1 x orig9at$ 9 ! contemplation ( ! p[] 9 nature ap>t f ! moral ,p]sonality t works 9 & ?r\gh nature4 ,inde$ we may say t all hea!nism is man's *oice ( a non-moral 9 place ( a moral ,god4 ,brahmanism is a sy/em ( pan!ism1 8a false or illegitimate consecration ( ! f9ite40 ,all ?+s are a manife/ation ( ,brahma4 ,h5ce evil is deifi$ z well z good4 ,& _m ?\s& gods are wor%ip$ z p>tial repres5tations ( ! liv+ pr9ciple :i* moves ?r\gh all4 8,h[ _m gods h ! ,h9dus80 ask$ ,dr4 ,duff ( 8 class4 ,h5ry ,drummond ?\ght !re 7 ab\t tw5ty-five4 8,tw5ty-five80 respond$ ! indignant pr(essor2 8tw5ty-five millions ( millions60 ,:ile ! e>ly ,v$as pres5t a comp>atively pure nature-wor%ip1 lat] ,brahmanism becomes a wor%ip ( ! vici\s & ! vile1 ( ! unnatural & ! cruel4 ,jugg]naut & ! suttee did n belong to orig9al ,h9du religion4 ,bruce1 ,apologetics1 #ae--8,pan!ism 9 !ory always means poly!ism 9 practice40 ,! e>ly ,v$as are hopeful 9 _s2 lat] ,brahmanism is a religion ( disappo9tm5t4 ,ca/e is fix$ & consecrat$ z a manife/ation ( ,god4 ,orig9ally int5d$ to express1 9 its f\r divisions ( prie/1 soldi]1 agriculturi/1 slave1 ! diff]5t degrees ( unworldl9ess & div9e indwell+1 x becomes an iron fett] to prev5t all aspiration & progress4 ,indian religion s\ght to exalt receptivity1 ! unity ( exi/5ce1 & re/ f self-det]m9ation & its /ruggles4 ,h5ce x ascrib$ to its gods ! same "* z nature-=ces4 ,god 0 ! common s\rce ( good & ( evil4 ,its e?ics is an e?ics ( moral indiff]5ce4 ,its *>ity is a *>ity = s91 & ! temp]ance x desires is a temp]ance t w let ! intemp]ate alone4 ,mozoomd>1 = example1 is ready to welcome ev]y?+ 9 ,*ri/ianity b its repro( ( s9 & its dem& = righte\sness4 ,brahmanism degrades woman1 b x deifies ! c[4 ,buddhism1 beg9n+ ) ,buddha1 #fjj ,b4 ,c41 8recalls ! m9d to its elevation above ! f9ite10 f :i* ,brahmanism _h fall5 away4 ,buddha 0 9 c]ta9 respects a re=m]4 ,he prote/$ aga9/ ca/e1 & proclaim$ t tru? & morality are = all4 ,h5ce ,buddhism1 ?r\gh its possession ( ?is "o gra9 ( tru?1 appeal$ to ! human he>t1 & became1 next to ,*ri/ianity1 ! greate/ mission>y religion4 ,notice !n1 fir/1 its univ]salism4 ,b notice also t ?is is a false univ]salism1 = x ignores individualism & leads to univ]sal /agnation & slav]y4 ,:ile ,*ri/ianity is a religion ( hi/ory1 ( w1 ( optimism1 ,buddhism is a religion ( illusion1 ( quietism1 ( pessimism2 see ,na%1 ,e?ics & ,revelation1 #ajg-aji4 ,9 *>act]iz+ ,buddhism z a mission>y religion1 we mu/ notice1 secondly1 its elem5t ( altruism4 ,b ?is altruism is "o :i* de/roys ! self1 in/ead ( pres]v+ x4 ,! future ,buddha1 out ( compassion = a fami%$ tig]1 p]mits ! tig] to dev\r him4 8,inc>nat$ z a h>e1 he jumps into ! fire to cook himself = a meal = a begg>1--hav+ previ\sly %ak5 himself ?ree times1 s t none ( ! insects 9 8 fur %\ld p]i% ) him02 see ,william ,james1 ,v>ieties ( ,religi\s ,exp]i5ce1 #bhc4 ,buddha w\ld deliv] man1 n by philosophy1 nor by asceticism1 b by self-r5unciation4 ,all isolation & p]sonality are s91 ! guilt ( :i* re/s1 h[ev]1 n on man1 b on exi/5ce 9 g5]al4 ,:ile ,brahmanism is pan!i/ic1 ,buddhism is a!i/ic 9 its _s4 ,pfleid]]1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #a3bhe--8,! ,brahmanic ,akosmism1 t _h expla9$ ! _w z m]e seem+1 l$ to ! ,buddhi/ic ,a!ism40 ,f9it5ess & sep>at5ess are evil1 & ! only way to purity & re/ is by ceas+ to exi/4 ,?is is ess5tial pessimism4 ,! highe/ morality is to endure t :i* mu/ be1 & to escape f reality & f p]sonal exi/5ce z soon z possible4 ,h5ce ! doctr9e ( ,nirvana4 ,rhys ,davids1 9 8 ,hibb]t ,lectures1 claims t e>ly ,buddhism meant by ,nirvana1 n annihilation1 b ! ext9ction ( ! self-life1 & t ?is 0 atta9able dur+ man's pres5t mortal exi/5ce4 ,b ! t]m ,nirvana n[ means1 to ! great mass ( ^? :o use x1 ! loss ( all p]sonality & consci\sness1 & absorption into ! g5]al life ( ! univ]se4 ,orig9ally ! t]m d5ot$ only fre$om f individual desire1 & ^? :o _h ent]$ into ,nirvana might aga9 come out ( x2 see ,irel&1 ,blot on ! ,bra91 #bch4 ,b ev5 9 its orig9al =m1 ,nirvana 0 s\ght only f a selfi% motive4 ,self-r5unciation & absorption 9 ! :ole 0 n ! en?usiasm ( b5evol5ce1--x 0 ! refuge ( despair4 ,x is a religion )\t god or sacrifice4 ,in/ead ( communion ) a p]sonal ,god1 ,buddhism has 9 prospect only an ext9ction ( p]sonality1 z rew>d = untold ages ( lonely self-conque/1 ext5d+ ?r\gh _m transmigrations4 ,( ,buddha x has be5 truly said 8,t all ! all he _h = ne$y man ,0 no?+1 & 8 be/ ( be+ 0 ,b n to be40 ,wilk9son1 ,epic ( ,paul1 #bif--8;,he by 8 own act dy+ all ! "t1 ,9 ceaseless ef=t utt]ly to cease1 ,w will+ n to w1 desire desir+ ,to be desire no m1 until at la/ ,! fugitive g free1 emancipate ,b by becom+ naught40 ,( ,*ri/ ,bruce well says3 8,:at a contra/ ?is ,heal] ( disease & ,prea*] ( p>don to ! wor/1 to ,buddha1 ) 8 religion ( despair60 ,buddhism is also fatali/ic4 ,x inculcates submission & compassion--m]ely negative virtues4 ,b x kn[s no?+ ( manly fre$om1 or ( active love--! positive virtues ( ,*ri/ianity4 ,x leads m5 to sp>e o!rs1 b n to help !m4 ,its morality revolves ar\nd self1 n ar\nd ,god4 ,x has 9 x no organiz+ pr9ciple1 = x recognizes no ,god1 no inspiration1 no s\l1 no salvation1 no p]sonal immortality4 ,buddhism w\ld save m5 only by induc+ !m to flee f exi/5ce4 ,to ! ,h9du1 family life involves s94 ,! p]fect man mu/ =sake wife & *ildr54 ,all gratification ( natural appetites & passions is evil4 ,salvation is n f s91 b f desire1 & f ?is m5 c be sav$ only by escap+ f life itself4 ,*ri/ianity buries s91 b saves ! man2 ,buddha w\ld save ! man by kill+ him4 ,*ri/ianity symbolizes ! conv]t's entrance ^u a new life by rais+ him f ! baptismal wat]s2 ! baptism ( ,buddhism %\ld be imm]sion )\t em]sion4 ,! fundam5tal idea ( ,brahmanism1 ext9ction ( p]sonality1 rema9s ! same 9 ,buddhism2 ! only diff]5ce be+ t ! result is secur$ by active atonem5t 9 ! =m]1 by passive contemplation 9 ! latt]4 ,virtue1 & ! k t ev]y?+ e>?ly is a vani%+ sp>k ( ! orig9al light1 deliv]s man f exi/5ce & f mis]y4 ,pr(4 ,g4 ,h4 ,palm]1 ( ,h>v>d1 9 ,! ,outlook1 ,june #ai1 #ahig--8;,buddhism is unlike ,*ri/ianity 9 t x aboli%es mis]y by aboli%+ desire2 d5ies p]sonality in/ead ( ass]t+ x2 has _m gods1 b no "o ,god :o is liv+ & consci\s2 makes a %ort5+ ( exi/5ce r ?an a l5g!n+ ( x to be ! rew>d ( righte\sness4 ,buddhism makes no provision = family1 *ur*1 /ate1 sci5ce1 or art4 ,x gives u a religion t is little1 :5 we want "o t is l>ge40 ,dr4 ,e4 ,b5jam9 ,&rews3 8,s*op5hau] & ,sp5c] are m]ely tea*]s ( ,buddhism4 ,!y reg>d ! c5tral s\rce ( all z unkn[able =ce1 in/ead ( reg>d+ x z a ,_s1 liv+ & holy4 ,?is takes away all impulse to sci5tific inve/igation4 ,we ne$ to />t f a ,p]son1 & n f a ?+40 ,= comp>ison ( ! sage ( ,india1 ,sakya ,muni1 m commonly call$ ,buddha 7prop]ly 8! ,buddha0 ! enlight5$2 b :o1 9 spite ( ,edw9 ,arnold's 8,light ( ,asia10 is repres5t$ z n pure f c>nal pleasures be=e he began 8 "w71 ) ,jesus ,*ri/1 see ,bib4 ,sac41 ,july1 #ahhb3deh-dih2 ,w4 ,c4 ,wilk9son1 ,edw9 ,arnold1 ,poetiz] & ,paganiz]2 ,kellogg1 ,! ,light ( ,asia & ! ,light ( ! ,_w4 ,buddhism & ,*ri/ianity are comp>$ 9 ,presb4 ,rev41 ,july1 #ahhc3eje-edh2 ,wuttke1 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics1 #a3dg-ed2 ,mit*ell1 9 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #f3 no4 #cc4 ,see also ,old5b]g1 ,buddha2 ,lillie1 ,popul> ,life ( ,buddha2 ,beal1 ,cat5a ( ,buddhi/ ,scriptures1 #aec--8;,buddhism decl>es itself ignorant ( any mode ( p]sonal exi/5ce compatible ) ! idea ( spiritual p]fection1 & s f> x is ignorant ( ,god02 #aeg--8,! e>lie/ idea ( ,nirvana seems to h includ$ 9 x no m ?an ! enjoym5t ( a /ate ( re/ consequ5t on ! ext9ction ( all causes ( sorr[40 ,! impossibility ( satisfy+ ! human he>t ) a sy/em ( a!ism is %[n by ! fact t ! ,buddha himself has be5 apo!osiz$ to furni% an object ( wor%ip4 ,?us ,buddhism has rev]t$ to ,brahmanism4 ,moni] ,williams3 8,mohamm$ has z mu* claim to be #8! ,light ( ,asia' z ,buddha has4 ,:at light f ,buddha8 ,n ab\t ! he>t's depravity1 or ! orig9 ( s91 or ! goodness1 ju/ice1 hol9ess1 fa!rhood ( ,god1 or ! rem$y = s91 b only ! ridd+ self f suff]+ by ridd+ self f life--a doctr9e ( m]it1 ( self-tru/1 ( pessimism1 & annihilation ( p]sonality40 ,*ri/1 himself p]sonal1 lov+ & holy1 %[s t ,god is a p]son ( hol9ess & love4 ,rob]t ,br[n+3 8,he t creat$ love1 %all n he love80 ,only because ,jesus is ,god1 h we a gospel = ! _w4 ,! claim t ,buddha is 8! ,light ( ,asia0 rem9ds "o ( ! man :o decl>$ ! moon to be ( great] value ?an ! sun1 because x gives light 9 ! d>kness :5 x is ne$$1 :ile ! sun gives light 9 ! daytime :5 x is n ne$$4 #c4 ,,! ,,greek ,,sy/ems4 ,py?agoras 7#ehd-ejd7 bas$ morality ^u ! pr9ciple ( numb]s4 8,moral good 0 id5tifi$ ) unity2 evil ) multiplicity2 virtue 0 h>mony ( ! s\l & its lik5ess to ,god4 ,! aim ( life 0 to make x repres5t ! beautiful ord] ( ! ,univ]se4 ,! :ole practical t5d5cy ( ,py?agoreanism 0 ascetic1 & includ$ a /rict self-control & an e>ne/ culture40 ,"h already we seem to see ! defect ( ,greek morality 9 conf\nd+ ! good ) ! beautiful1 & 9 mak+ morality a m]e self-developm5t4 ,ma!son1 ,messages ( ! ,old ,religions3 ,greece reveals ! int5sity ( ! h\r1 ! value ( ! pres5t life1 ! beauty ( ! _w t n[ is4 ,its religion is ! religion ( beautiful humanity4 ,x anticipates ! new heav5 & ! new e>?4 ,rome on ! o!r h& /ood = union1 incorporation1 a univ]sal k+dom4 ,b its religion deifi$ only ! ,emp]or1 n all humanity4 ,x 0 ! religion1 n ( love1 b ( p[]1 & x id5tifi$ ! *ur* ) ! /ate4 ,socrates 7#dfi-djj7 made k to be virtue4 ,morality consi/$ 9 subord9at+ irrational desires to rational k4 ,al?\gh "h we rise above a subjectively det]m9$ good z ! goal ( moral ef=t1 we h no prop] s5se ( s94 ,k1 & n love1 is ! motive4 ,if m5 "k ! "r1 !y w d ! "r4 ,?is is a great ov]valu+ ( k4 ,) ,socrates1 tea*+ is a sort ( midwif]y--n deposit+ in=mation 9 ! m9d1 b draw+ out ! cont5ts ( our own inn] consci\sness4 ,lewis ,morris describes x z ! life-"w ( ,socrates to 8d\bt our d\bts away40 ,socrates holds x "r to injure "o's enemies4 ,he %[s pr\d self-praise 9 8 dy+ address4 ,he w>ns aga9/ p$]a/y1 yet compromises ) x4 ,he does n insi/ ^u ! same purity ( family life :i* ,hom] describes 9 ,ulysses & ,p5elope4 ,*>les ,k+sley1 9 ,alton ,locke1 rem>ks t ! _s ( ! ,greek trag$y 0 'man ma/]$ by circum/ance'2 t ( mod]n trag$y is 8man ma/]+ circum/ance40 ,b ! ,greek trag$ians1 :ile %[+ man ?us ma/]$1 d /ill repres5t him z inw>dly free1 z 9 ! case ( ,prome!us1 & ?is s5se ( human fre$om & responsibility appe>s to "s ext5t 9 ,socrates4 ,plato 7#dcj-cdh7 held t morality is pleasure 9 ! good1 z ! truly beautiful1 & t k produces virtue4 ,! good is lik5ess to ,god1--"h we h glimpses ( an extra-human goal & model4 ,! body1 l all matt]1 be+ inh]5tly evil1 is a h9drance to ! s\l1--"h we h a glimpse ( h]$it>y depravity4 ,b ,plato 8r$uc$ moral evil to ! category ( natural evil40 ,he fail$ to recognize ,god z creator & ma/] ( matt]2 fail$ to recognize man's depravity z due to 8 own apo/asy f ,god2 fail$ to f\nd morality on ! div9e w r ?an on man's own consci\sness4 ,he knew no?+ ( a common humanity1 & reg>d$ virtue z only = ! few4 ,z !re 0 no common s91 s !re 0 no common r$emption4 ,plato ?\ght to rea* ,god by intellect alone1 :5 only consci5ce & he>t c\ld lead to him4 ,he believ$ 9 a fre$om ( ! s\l 9 a prexi/5t /ate :]e a *oice 0 made betwe5 good & evil1 b he believ$ t1 aft] t antemundane decision _h be5 made1 ! fates det]m9$ m5's acts & lives irrev]sibly4 ,reason drives two horses1 appetite & emotion1 b _! c\rse has be5 pr$et]m9$4 ,man acts z reason prompts4 ,all s9 is ignorance4 ,!re is no?+ 9 ?is life b det]m9ism4 ,m>t9eau1 ,types1 #ac1 #dh1 #di1 #gh1 #hh--,plato 9 g5]al has no prop] notion ( responsibility2 he r$uces moral evil to ! category ( natural evil4 ,8 ,ideas ) "o exception are n causes4 ,cause is m9d1 & m9d is ! ,good4 ,! ,good is ! apex & cr[n ( ,ideas4 ,! ,good is ! highe/ ,idea1 & ?is highe/ ,idea is a ,cause4 ,plato has a feeble conception ( p]sonality1 :e!r 9 ,god or 9 man4 ,yet ,god is a p]son 9 :atev] s5se man is a p]son1 & man's p]sonality is reflective self-consci\sness4 ,w 9 ,god or man is n s cle>4 ,! ,"r is dissolv$ into ! ,good4 ,plato advocat$ infanticide & ! kill+ (f ( ! old & ! helpless4 ,ari/otle 7#chd-cbb7 leaves out ( view ev5 ! elem5t ( ,god-lik5ess & antemundane evil :i* ,plato s dimly recogniz$1 & makes morality ! fruit ( m]e rational self-consci\sness4 ,he grants evil proclivities1 b he refuses to call !m immoral4 ,he advocates a c]ta9 fre$om ( w1 & he recognizes inborn t5d5cies :i* w> aga9/ ?is fre$om1 b h[ ^! t5d5cies orig9at$ he _c say1 nor h[ m5 may be deliv]$ f !m4 ,n all c be moral2 ! majority mu/ be re/ra9$ by fe>4 ,he f9ds 9 ,god no motive1 & love to ,god is n s mu* z m5tion$ z ! s\rce ( moral action4 ,a pr\d1 compos$1 self-c5t]$1 & self-conta9$ man is 8 ideal "*4 ,see ,nicoma*ean ,e?ics1 #g3f1 & #aj3aj2 ,wuttke1 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics1 #a3ib-abf4 ,alex&]1 ,!ories ( ,w1 #ci-ed--;,ari/otle held t desire & reason are ! spr+s ( action4 ,yet he did n hold t k ( itself w\ld make m5 virtu\s4 ,he 0 a det]m9i/4 ,actions are free only 9 ! s5se ( be+ devoid ( ext]nal compulsion4 ,he view$ slav]y z bo? rational & "r4 ,but*]1 ,aspects ( ,greek ,g5ius1 #gf--8,:ile ,ari/otle attribut$ to ! ,/ate a m complete p]sonality ?an x really possess$1 he did n grasp ! dep? & mean+ ( ! p]sonality ( ! individual40 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #bhi--;,ari/otle _h no conception ( ! unity ( humanity4 ,8 doctr9e ( unity did n ext5d beyond ! ,/ate4 8,he said t #8! :ole is be=e ! p>ts1' b he meant by #8! :ole' only ! pan-,hell5ic _w1 ! commonweal? ( ,greeks2 he nev] ?\ght ( humanity1 & ! ^w #8mank9d' nev] fell f 8 lips4 ,he c\ld n und]/& ! unity ( humanity1 because he knew no?+ ( ,*ri/1 its organiz+ pr9ciple40 ,on ,ari/otle's conception ( ,god1 see ,james ,t5 ,broeke1 9 ,bap4 ,qu>4 ,rev41 ,jan4 #ahib--;,god is recogniz$ z p]sonal1 yet he is only ! ,greek ,reason1 & n ! liv+1 lov+1 provid5tial ,fa!r ( ! ,hebrew revelation4 ,ari/otle sub/itutes ! logical = ! dynamical 9 8 deal+ ) ! div9e causality4 ,god is ?\ght1 n p[]4 ,epicurus 7#cdb-bgj7 reg>d$ happ9ess1 ! subjective feel+ ( pleasure1 z ! highe/ crit]ion ( tru? & good4 ,a prud5t calculat+ = prolong$ pleasure is ! highe/ wisdom4 ,he reg>ds only ?is life4 ,conc]n = retribution & = a future exi/5ce is folly4 ,if !re are gods1 !y h no conc]n = m54 8,epicurus1 on pret5se ( consult+ = _! ease1 complim5t$ ! gods1 & b[$ !m out ( exi/5ce40 ,dea? is ! fall+ ap>t ( mat]ial atoms & ! et]nal cessation ( consci\sness4 ,! mis]ies ( ?is life are due to imp]fection 9 ! =tuit\sly con/ruct$ univ]se4 ,! m num]\s ^! undes]v$ mis]ies1 ! great] our "r to seek pleasure4 ,alex&]1 ,!ories ( ! ,w1 #ee-ge--,! ,epicureans held t ! s\l is compos$ ( atoms1 yet t ! w is free4 ,! atoms ( ! s\l are except$ f ! law ( cause & effect4 ,an atom may decl9e or deviate 9 ! univ]sal desc5t1 & ?is is ! ,epicurean idea ( fre$om4 ,?is indet]m9ism 0 held by all ! ,greek sceptics1 mat]iali/s ?\gh !y 74 ,z5o1 ! f\nd] ( ! ,/oic philosophy 7#cdj-bfd71 reg>d$ virtue z ! only good4 ,?\ght is to subdue nature4 ,! free _s is self-legislat+1 self-dep5d5t1 self-suffici5t4 ,?9k+1 n feel+1 is ! crit]ion ( ! true & ! good4 ,pleasure is ! consequ5ce1 n ! end ( moral action4 ,!re is an irreconcilable antagonism ( exi/5ce4 ,man _c re=m ! _w1 b he c make himself p]fect4 ,h5ce an unb\nd$ pride 9 virtue4 ,! sage nev] rep5ts4 ,!re is n ! lea/ recognition ( ! moral corruption ( mank9d4 ,!re is no objective div9e ideal1 or reveal$ div9e w4 ,! ,/oic discov]s moral law only )91 & nev] suspects 8 own moral p]v]sion4 ,h5ce he %[s self-control & ju/ice1 b nev] humility or love4 ,he ne$s no compassion or =giv5ess1 & he grants none to o!rs4 ,virtue is n an actively outwork+ "*1 b a passive resi/ance to irrational reality4 ,man may retreat into himself4 ,! ,/oic is indiff]5t to pleasure & pa91 n because he believes 9 a div9e gov]nm5t1 or 9 a div9e love = mank9d1 b z a pr\d defiance ( ! irrational _w4 ,he has no ne$ ( ,god or ( r$emption4 ,z ! ,epicurean gives himself to enjoym5t ( ! _w1 ! ,/oic gives himself to contempt ( ! _w4 ,9 all afflictions1 ea* c say1 8,! door is op540 ,to ! ,epicurean1 ! refuge is intoxication2 to ! ,/oic1 ! refuge is suicide3 8,if ! h\se smokes1 quit x40 ,wuttke1 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics1 #a3fb-afa1 f :om mu* ( ?is acc\nt ( ! ,greeks sy/ems is cond5s$1 describes ,epicureanism & ,/oicism z alike mak+ morality subjective1 al?\gh ,epicureanism reg>d$ _s z det]m9$ by nature1 :ile ,/oicism reg>d$ nature z det]m9$ by _s4 ,! ,/oics 7 mat]iali/s & pan!i/s4 ,?\gh !y speak ( a p]sonal ,god1 ?is is a figure ( spee*4 ,false op9ion is at ! root ( all vice4 ,*rysippus d5i$ :at we n[ call ! lib]ty ( indiff]5ce1 say+ t !re c\ld n be an effect )\t a cause4 ,man is enslav$ to passion4 ,! ,/oics c\ld n expla9 h[ a vici\s man c\ld become virtu\s4 ,! result is apa?y4 ,m5 act only accord+ to "*1 & ?is a doctr9e ( fate4 ,! ,/oic indiff]5ce or apa?y 9 mis=tune is n a be>+ ( x at all1 b r a c[>dly retreat f x4 ,x is 9 ! actual suff]+ ( evil t ,*ri/ianity f9ds 8! s\l ( good40 ,! (fice ( mis=tune is discipl9>y & purify+2 see ,se?1 ,e?ical ,pr9ciples1 #dag4 8,! %ad[ ( ! sage's self1 project$ on vacancy1 0 call$ ,god1 &1 z ! sage _h long s9ce ab&on$ int]e/ 9 practical life1 he expect$ 8 ,div9ity to d ! same40 ,! ,/oic rev]5c$ ,god j because ( 8 unapproa*able maje/y4 ,*ri/ianity sees 9 ,god a ,fa!r1 a ,r$eem]1 a c>] = our m9ute wants1 a deliv]] f our s94 ,x tea*es u to see 9 ,*ri/ ! humanity ( ! div9e1 aff9ity ) ,god1 ,god's supreme int]e/ 9 8 h&iwork4 ,= ! lea/ ( 8 creatures ,*ri/ di$4 ,k9%ip ) ,god gives dignity to man4 ,! individuality t ,/oicism lo/ 9 ! :ole1 ,*ri/ianity makes ! end ( ! creation4 ,! ,/ate exi/s to develop & promote x4 ,paul took up & infus$ new mean+ into c]ta9 phrases ( ! ,/oic philosophy ab\t ! fre$om & royalty ( ! wise man1 j z ,john adopt$ & glorifi$ c]ta9 phrases ( ,alex&rian philosophy ab\t ! ,^w4 ,/oicism 0 lonely & pessimi/ic4 ,! ,/oics said t ! be/ ?+ 0 n to be born2 ! next be/ ?+ 0 to die4 ,because ,/oicism _h no ,god ( helpfulness & sympa?y1 its virtue 0 m]e con=mity to nature1 maje/ic egoism & self-complac5cy4 ,9 ! ,roman ,epictetus 7#hi71 ,s5eca 7#fe71 & ,m>cus ,aurelius 7#aba-ahj71 ! religi\s elem5t comes m into ! =egr\nd1 & virtue appe>s once m z ,god-lik5ess2 b x is possible t ?is lat] ,/oicism 0 influ5c$ by ,*ri/ianity4 ,on ,m>cus ,aurelius1 see ,new ,engl&]1 ,july1 #ahha3dae-dca2 ,capes1 ,/oicism4 #d4 ,,sy/ems ,,( ,,we/]n ,,asia4 ,zoroa/] 7#ajjj ,b4 ,c4 871 ! f\nd] ( ! ,p>sees1 0 a duali/1 at lea/ s f> z to expla9 ! exi/5ce ( evil & ( good by ! orig9al pres5ce 9 ! au?or ( all ?+s ( two oppos+ pr9ciples4 ,"h is evid5tly a limit put ^u ! sov]eignty & hol9ess ( ,god4 ,man is n p]fectly dep5d5t ^u him1 nor is ,god's w an unconditional law = 8 creatures4 ,z oppos$ to ! ,indian sy/ems1 ,zoroa/]'s insi/5ce ^u ! div9e p]sonality furni%$ a f> bett] basis = a vigor\s & manly morality4 ,virtue 0 to be won by h>d /ruggle ( free be+s aga9/ evil4 ,b !n1 on ! o!r h&1 ?is evil 0 conceiv$ z orig9ally due1 n to f9ite be+s !mselves1 b ei!r to an evil deity :o w>r$ aga9/ ! good1 or to an evil pr9ciple 9 ! "o deity himself4 ,! burd5 ( guilt is !re=e %ift$ f man to 8 mak]4 ,morality becomes subjective & unsettl$4 ,n love to ,god or imitation ( ,god1 b r self-love & self-developm5t1 furni% ! motive & aim ( morality4 ,no fa!rhood or love is recogniz$ 9 ! deity1 & o!r ?+s besides ,god 7e4 g41 fire7 are wor%ip$4 ,!re c be no dep? to ! consci\sness ( s91 & no hope ( div9e deliv]ance4 ,x is ! "o m]it ( ,p>seeism t x recognizes ! moral conflict ( ! _w2 its error is t x c>ries ?is moral conflict into ! v nature ( ,god4 ,we c apply to ,p>seeism ! words ( ! ,conf]5ce ( ,=eign ,mission ,bo>ds to ! ,buddhi/s ( ,japan3 8,all religions are expressions ( man's s5se ( dep5d5ce1 b only "o provides fell[%ip ) ,god4 ,all religions speak ( a high] tru?1 b only "o speaks ( t tru? z f\nd 9 a lov+ p]sonal ,god1 our ,fa!r4 ,all religions %[ man's helplessness1 b only "o tells ( a div9e ,savior1 :o (f]s to man =giv5ess ( s91 & salvation ?r\gh 8 dea?1 & :o is n[ a liv+ p]son1 work+ 9 & ) all :o believe 9 him1 to make !m holy & righte\s & pure40 ,ma!son1 ,messages ( ,old ,religions1 says t ,p>seeism recognizes an ob/ructive elem5t 9 ! nature ( ,god himself4 ,moral evil is reality2 b !re is no reconciliation1 nor is x %[n t all ?+s "w toge!r = good4 ,see ,wuttke1 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics1 #a3dg-ed2 ,fai?s ( ! ,_w 7,/4 ,giles ,lectures71 #aji-add2 ,mit*ell1 9 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #c3 no4 #be2 ,:itney on ! ,ave/a1 9 ,ori5tal & ,l+ui/ic ,/udies4 ,mohamm$ 7#egj-fcb ,a4 ,d471 ! f\nd] ( ,islam1 gives u 9 ! ,koran a sy/em conta9+ f\r dogmas ( fundam5tal immorality1 namely1 polygamy1 slav]y1 p]secution1 & suppression ( private judgem5t4 ,mohamm$anism is hea!nism 9 mono!i/ic =m4 ,its good po9ts are its consci5ti\sness & its relation to ,god4 ,x has prosp]$ because x has prea*$ ! unity ( ,god1 & because x is a book-religion4 ,b bo? ^! x got f ,judaism & ,*ri/ianity4 ,x has appropriat$ ! ,old ,te/am5t sa9ts & ev5 ,jesus4 ,b x d5ies ! dea? ( ,*ri/ & sees no ne$ ( atonem5t4 ,! p[] ( s9 is n recogniz$4 ,! idea ( s91 9 ,moslems1 is empti$ ( all positive cont5t4 ,s9 is simply a fall+ %ort1 acc\nt$ = by ! weakness & %ortsight$ness ( man1 inevitable 9 ! fatali/ic univ]se1 or n rememb]$ 9 wra? by ! indulg5t & m]ciful ,fa!r4 ,=giv5ess is indulg5ce1 & ! conception ( ,god is empti$ ( ! quality ( ju/ice4 ,evil belongs only to ! individual1 n to ! race4 ,man atta9s ! favor ( ,god by good works1 bas$ on prophetic tea*+4 ,morality is n a fruit ( salvation1 b a means4 ,!re is no p5it5ce or humility1 b only self-righte\sness2 & ?is self-righte\sness is consi/5t ) great s5suality1 unlimit$ divorce1 & ) absolute despotism 9 family1 civil & religi\s affairs4 ,!re is no k ( ! fa!rhood ( ,god or ( ! bro!rhood ( man4 ,9 all ! ,koran1 !re is no su* decl>ation z t 8,god s lov$ ! _w0 7,john #c3af74 ,! submission ( ,islam is submission to an arbitr>y w1 n to a ,god ( love4 ,!re is no bas+ ( morality 9 love4 ,! highe/ good is ! s5su\s happ9ess ( ! individual4 ,god & man are ext]nal to "o ano!r4 ,mohamm$ is a tea*] b n a prie/4 ,mozley1 ,miracles1 #adj1 #ada--8,mohamm$ _h no fai? 9 human nature4 ,!re 7 two ?+s :i* he ?\ght m5 c\ld d1 & w\ld d1 = ! glory ( ,god--transact religi\s =ms1 & fight1 & ^u ^! two po9ts he 0 sev]e2 b )9 ! sph]e ( common practical life1 :]e man's great trial lies1 8 code exhibits ! disda9ful laxity ( a legislator :o accomodates 8 rule to ! recipi5t1 & %[s 8 e/imate ( ! recipi5t by ! accommodation :i* he adopts4444 #8,human nature is weak1' said he40 ,"l ,h\ghton3 ,! ,koran is all wisdom1 all law1 all religion1 = all "t4 ,dead m5 b[ be=e a dead ,god4 8,?\gh ! _w rolls on f *ange to *ange1 ,& realms ( ?\ght exp&1 ,! lett] /&s )\t expanse or range1 ,/iff z a dead man's h&40 ,:]ev] ,mohamm$anism has gone1 x has ei!r f\nd a des]t or made "o4 ,fairbairn1 9 ,contemp4 ,rev41 ,dec4 #ahhb3hff--8,! ,koran has froz5 ,mohamm$an ?\ght2 to obey is to ab&on progress40 ,muir1 9 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #c3 no4 #ad--8,mohamm$anism r$uces m5 to a dead level ( social depression1 despotism1 & semi-b>b>ism4 ,islam is ! "w ( man2 ,*ri/ianity ( ,god40 ,see also ,fai?s ( ! ,_w 7,/4 ,giles ,lectures1 ,second ,s]ies71 #cfa-cif2 ,j4 ,f4 ,cl>ke1 ,t5 ,great ,religions1 #a3ddh-dhh2 #bhj-cag2 ,great ,religions ( ! ,_w1 publi%$ by ! ,h>p]s2 ,zwem]1 ,moslem ,doctr9e ( ,god4 #c4 ,! p]son & "* ( ,*ri/4 ,a4 ,! conception ( ,*ri/'s p]son z pres5t+ deity & humanity indissolubly unit$1 & ! conception ( ,*ri/'s "*1 ) its faultless & all-compreh5d+ excell5ce1 _c be acc\nt$ = ^u any o!r hypo!sis ?an t !y 7 hi/orical realities4 ,! /ylobate ( ! ,p>!non at ,a!ns rises ab\t ?ree in*es 9 ! middle ( ! #aja feet ( ! front1 & f\r in*es 9 ! middle ( ! #bbh feet ( ! flanks4 ,a ne>ly p>allel l9e is f\nd 9 ! entablature4 ,! axes ( ! columns lean inw>d ne>ly ?ree in*es 9 _! height ( #cd feet1 ?us giv+ a sort ( pyramidal "* to ! /ructure4 ,?us ! ar*itect ov]came ! app>5t sagg+ ( horizontal l9es1 & at ! same "t increas$ ! app>5t height ( ! edifice2 see ,murray1 ,h&book ( ,greece1 #e? ed41 #ahhd1 #a3cjh1 #cji2 ,f]guson1 ,h&book ( ,ar*itecture1 #bfh-bgj4 ,! neglect to c\nt]act ?is optical illusion has r5d]$ ! ,madele9e 9 ,p>is a /iff & ineffective copy ( ! ,p>!non4 ,! ,galilean peasant :o %\ld m9utely describe ^! peculi>ities ( ! ,p>!non w\ld prove1 n only t ! edifice 0 a hi/orical reality1 b t he _h actually se5 x4 ,bruce1 ,apologetics1 #cdc--8;,9 read+ ! memoirs ( ! evangeli/s1 y feel z "o sometimes feels 9 a picture-gall]y4 ,y\r eye alights on ! portrait ( a p]son :om y d n "k4 ,y look at x int5tly = a few mom5ts & !n rem>k to a companion3 #8,t mu/ be l ! orig9al1--x is s life-l4' 0 ,!odore ,p>k]3 8,x w\ld take a ,jesus to =ge a ,jesus40 ,see ,r[1 ,bampton ,lectures1 #ahgg3agh-bai1 & 9 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #d3 no4 #bb2 ,f4 ,w4 ,f>r>1 ,witness ( ,hi/ory to ,*ri/2 ,b>ry1 ,boyle ,lecture on ,manifold ,witness = ,*ri/4 7a7 ,no s\rce c be assign$ f :i* ! evangeli/s c\ld h d]iv$ su* a conception4 ,! ,h9du avat>s 7 only tempor>y unions ( deity ) humanity4 ,! ,greeks _h m5 half-deifi$1 b no unions ( ,god & man4 ,! mono!ism ( ! ,jews f\nd ! p]son ( ,*ri/ a p]petual /umbl+-block4 ,! ,ess5es 7 9 pr9ciple m oppos$ to ,*ri/ianity ?an ! ,rabb9i/s4 ,h]b]t ,sp5c]1 ,data ( ,e?ics1 #bgi--8,! coxi/5ce ( a p]fect man & an imp]fect society is impossible2 & c\ld ! two coxi/1 ! result+ conduct w\ld n furni% ! e?ical /&>d s\ght40 ,we mu/ conclude t ! p]fect manhood ( ,*ri/ is a miracle1 & ! greate/ ( miracles4 ,bruce1 ,apologetics1 #cdf1 #cea--8,:5 ,jesus asks3 #8,:y calle/ ?\ me good8' he means3 #8,le>n fir/ :at goodness is1 & call no man good till y are sure t he des]ves x4' ,jesus' goodness 0 entirely free f religi\s scrupulosity2 x 0 di/+ui%$ by humanity2 x 0 full ( mode/y & l[l9ess4444 ,buddhism has fl\ri%$ #bjjj ye>s1 ?\gh little is kn[n ( its f\nd]4 ,*ri/ianity might h be5 s p]petuat$1 b x is n s4 ,i want to be sure t ! ideal has be5 embodi$ 9 an actual life4 ,o!rwise x is only poetry1 & ! obligation to con=m to x ceases40 ,= comp>ison ( ,*ri/'s inc>nation ) ,h9du1 ,greek1 ,jewi%1 & ,ess5e ideas1 see ,dorn]1 ,hi/4 ,doct4 ,p]son ( ,*ri/1 ,introduction4 ,on ! ,ess5es1 see ,h]zog1 ,encyclop41 art13 ,ess5]2 ,press5s1 ,jesus ,*ri/1 ,life1 ,times & ,"w1 #hd-hg2 ,lightfoot on ,colossians1 #cdi-dai2 ,godet1 ,lectures 9 ,def5ce ( ! ,*ri/ian ,fai?4 7b7 ,no m]e human g5ius1 & mu* less ! g5ius ( ,jewi% fi%]m51 c\ld h orig9at$ ?is conception4 ,bad m5 inv5t only su* *>act]s z !y sympa?ize )4 ,b ,*ri/'s "* condemns badness4 ,su* a portrait c\ld n h be5 drawn )\t sup]natural aid4 ,b su* aid w\ld n h be5 giv5 to fabrication4 ,! conception c be expla9$ only by grant+ t ,*ri/'s p]son & "* 7 hi/orical realities4 ,betwe5 ,pilate & ,titus #cj1jjj ,jews are said to h be5 crucifi$ ar\nd ! walls ( ,j]usalem4 ,_m ( ^! 7 "y m54 ,:at makes "o ( !m /& out on ! pages ( hi/ory8 ,!re are two answ]s3 ,! "* ( ,jesus 0 a p]fect "*1 &1 ,he 0 ,god z well z man4 ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #fc--8,! ,*ri/ ( ! gospels1 if he be n true to hi/ory1 repres5ts a comb9$ ef=t ( ! creative imag9ation )\t p>allel 9 lit]ature4 ,b ! lit]>y *>act]i/ics ( ,pale/9e 9 ! fir/ c5tury make ! hypo!sis ( su* an ef=t morally impossible40 ,! ,apocryphal gospels %[ u :at m]e imag9ation 0 capable ( produc+4 ,t ! portrait ( ,*ri/ is n pu]ile1 inane1 hy/]ical1 selfi%ly ass]tive1 & self-contradictory1 c be due only to ! fact t x is ! photograph f real life4 ,= a rem>kable exhibition ( ! argum5t f ! "* ( ,jesus1 see ,bu%nell1 ,nature & ! ,sup]natural1 #bgf-ccb4 ,bu%nell m5tions ! orig9ality & va/ness ( ,*ri/'s plan1 yet its simplicity & practical adaptation2 8 moral traits ( indep5d5ce1 compassion1 meekness1 wisdom1 zeal1 humility1 pati5ce2 ! comb9ation 9 him ( seem+ly opposite qualities4 ,) all 8 greatness1 he 0 condesc5d+ & simple2 he 0 unworldly1 yet n au/]e2 he _h /rong feel+s1 yet 0 self-possess$2 he _h indignation t[>d s91 yet compassion t[>d ! s9n]2 he %[$ devotion to 8 "w1 yet calmness "u opposition2 univ]sal philan?ropy1 yet susceptibility to private atta*m5ts2 ! au?ority ( a ,savior & ,judge1 yet ! gratitude & ! t5d]ness ( a son2 ! mo/ elevat$ devotion1 yet a life ( activity & ex]tion4 ,see *apt] on ,! ,moral ,miracle1 9 ,bruce1 ,miracul\s ,elem5t ( ! ,gospels1 #dc-gh4 ,b4 ,! acceptance & belief 9 ! ,new ,te/am5t descriptions ( ,jesus ,*ri/ _c be acc\nt$ = except ^u ! gr\nd t ! p]son & "* describ$ _h an actual exi/5ce4 7a7 ,if ^! descriptions 7 false1 !re 7 witnesses /ill liv+ :o _h kn[n ,*ri/ & :o w\ld h contradict$ !m4 7b7 ,!re 0 no motive to induce acceptance ( su* false acc\nts1 b e motive to ! contr>y4 7c7 ,! success ( su* falsehoods c\ld be expla9$ only by sup]natural aid1 b ,god w\ld nev] h ?us aid$ falsehood4 ,?is p]son & "*1 !re=e1 mu/ h be5 n fictiti\s b real2 & if real1 !n ,*ri/'s words are true1 & ! sy/em ( :i* 8 p]son & "* are a "p is a revelation f ,god4 8,! c\nt]feit may = a season ,deceive ! wide e>?2 ,b ! lie wax+ great comes to labor1 ,& tru? has its bir?40 ,mat!w ,arnold1 ,! ,bett] ,"p3 8,0 ,*ri/ a man l u8 ,ah1 let u see1 ,if we !n too c be ,su* m5 z he60 ,:5 ! blatant sceptic decl>$3 8,i d n believe t su* a man z ,jesus ,*ri/ ev] liv$10 ,george ,w>r5 m]ely repli$3 8,i wi% ,i 7 l him60 ,dwight ,l4 ,moody 0 call$ a hypocrite1 b ! /alw>t evangeli/ answ]$3 8,well1 suppose ,i am4 ,h[ does t make y\r case any bett]8 ,i "k "s pretty mean ?+s ab\t myself2 b y _c say any?+ aga9/ my ,ma/]40 ,goe!3 8,let ! culture ( ! _s advance =ev]2 let ! human _s broad5 itself z x w2 yet x w nev] g beyond ! height & moral culture ( ,*ri/ianity1 z x glitt]s & %9es 9 ! gospels40 ,r5an1 ,life ( ,jesus3 8,jesus f\nd$ ! absolute religion1 exclud+ no?+1 det]m9+ no?+1 save its ess5ce4444 ,! f\ndation ( ! true religion is inde$ 8 "w4 ,aft] him1 !re is no?+ left b to develop & fructify40 ,& a ,*ri/ian s*ol> has rem>k$3 8,x is an a/oni%+ pro( ( ! div9e guidance v\*saf$ to ! evangeli/s t no man1 ( _! "t or s9ce1 has be5 able to t\* ! picture ( ,*ri/ )\t debas+ x40 ,we may f9d an illu/ration ( ?is 9 ! words ( ,*adwick1 ,old & ,new ,unit>ianism1 #bjg--8;,jesus' doctr9e ( m>riage 0 ascetic1 8 doctr9e ( prop]ty 0 communi/ic1 8 doctr9e ( *>ity 0 s5tim5tal1 8 doctr9e ( non-resi/ance 0 su* z comm5ds itself to ,tol/oi1 b n to _m o!rs ( our "t4 ,) ! example ( ,jesus1 x is ! same z ) 8 tea*+s4 ,foll[$ unres]v$ly1 w\ld x n ju/ify ^? :o say3 #8,! hope ( ! race is 9 its ext9ction'2 & br+ all our joys & sorr[s to a sudd5 end80 ,to ?is we may answ] 9 ! words ( ,huxley1 :o decl>es t ,jesus ,*ri/ is 8! noble/ ideal ( humanity :i* mank9d has yet wor%ip$40 ,gordon1 ,*ri/ ( ,to-,day1 #agi--8,! "q is n :e!r ,*ri/ is good en\gh to repres5t ! ,supreme ,be+1 b :e!r ! ,supreme ,be+ is good en\gh to h ,*ri/ = 8 repres5tative4 ,john ,/u>t ,mill looks ^u ! ,*ri/ian religion z ! wor%ip ( ,*ri/1 r ?an ! wor%ip ( ,god1 & 9 ?is way he expla9s ! b5efic5ce ( its influ5ce40 ,john ,/u>t ,mill1 ,essays on ,religion1 #bed--8,! mo/ valuable "p ( ! effect on ! "* :i* ,*ri/ianity has produc$1 by hold+ up 9 a div9e p]son a /&>d ( excell5ce & a model = imitation1 is available ev5 to ! absolute unbeliev]1 & c nev] m be lo/ to humanity4 ,= x is ,*ri/ r ?an ,god :om ,*ri/ianity has held up to believ]s z ! patt]n ( p]fection = humanity4 ,x is ! ,god inc>nate1 m ?an ! ,god ( ! ,jews or ( nature1 :o1 be+ idealiz$1 has tak5 s great & salut>y hold on ! mod]n m9d4 ,& :atev] else may be tak5 away f u by rational criticism1 ,*ri/ is /ill left3 a unique figure1 n m unlike all 8 precursors ?an all 8 foll[]s1 ev5 ^? :o _h ! direct b5efit ( 8 p]sonal prea*+4444 ,:o among 8 disciples1 or among _! proselytes1 0 capable ( inv5t+ ! say+s ascrib$ to ,jesus1 or ( imag9+ ! life & "* reveal$ 9 ! ,gospels8444 ,ab\t ! life & say+s ( ,jesus !re is a /amp ( p]sonal orig9ality comb9$ ) pr(undity ( insight :i*1 if we ab&on ! idle expectation ( f9d+ sci5tific precision :]e some?+ v diff]5t 0 aim$ at1 mu/ place ! ,prophet ( ,naz>e?1 ev5 9 ! e/imation ( ^? :o h no belief 9 8 inspiration1 9 ! v fir/ rank ( ! m5 ( sublime g5ius ( :om our species c boa/4 ,:5 ?is prem95t g5ius is comb9$ ) ! qualities ( probably ! greate/ moral re=m] & m>tyr to t mission :o ev] exi/$ ^u e>?1 religion _c be said to h made a bad *oice 9 pit*+ on ?is man z ! ideal repres5tative & guide ( humanity2 nor ev5 n[ w\ld x be easy1 ev5 = an unbeliev]1 to f9d a bett] translation ( ! rule ( virtue f ! ab/ract into ! concrete ?an ! endeavor s to live t ,*ri/ w\ld approve our life4 ,:5 to ?is we add t1 to ! conception ( ! rational sceptic1 x rema9s a possibility t ,*ri/ actually 0 444 a man *>g$ ) a special1 express & unique commission f ,god to lead mank9d to tru? & virtue1 we may well conclude t ! influ5ces ( religion on ! "*1 :i* w rema9 aft] rational criticism has done its utmo/ aga9/ ! evid5ces ( religion1 are well wor? pres]v+1 & t :at !y lack 9 direct /r5g? z comp>$ ) ^? ( a firm] belief is m ?an comp5sat$ by ! great] tru? & rectitude ( ! morality !y sanction40 ,see also ,ullmann1 ,s9lessness ( ,jesus2 ,alex&]1 ,*ri/ & ,*ri/ianity1 #abi-aeg2 ,s*aff1 ,p]son ( ,*ri/2 ,"y1 ,! ,*ri/ 9 ,hi/ory2 ,george ,dana ,bo>dman1 ,! ,problem ( ,jesus4 #d4 ,! te/imony ( ,*ri/ to himself--z be+ a mess5g] f ,god & z be+ "o ) ,god4 ,only "o p]sonage 9 hi/ory has claim$ to tea* absolute tru?1 to be "o ) ,god1 & to atte/ 8 div9e mission by works su* z only ,god c\ld p]=m4 ,a4 ,?is te/imony _c be acc\nt$ = ^u ! hypo!sis t ,jesus 0 an int5tional deceiv]3 = 7a7 ! p]fectly consi/5t hol9ess ( 8 life2 7b7 ! unwav]+ confid5ce ) :i* he *all5g$ inve/igation ( 8 claims & /ak$ all ^u ! result2 7c7 ! va/ improbability ( a lifelong lie 9 ! av[$ int]e/s ( tru?2 & 7d7 ! impossibility t deception %\ld h wr\ght su* bless+ to ! _w1--all %[ t ,jesus 0 no consci\s impo/or4 ,fi%]1 ,essays on ! ,sup]nat4 ,orig9 ( ,*ri/ianity1 #eae-ech--;,*ri/ knew h[ va/ 8 claims 71 yet he /ak$ all ^u !m4 ,?\gh o!rs d\bt$1 he nev] d\bt$ himself4 ,?\gh p]secut$ unto dea?1 he nev] ceas$ 8 consi/5t te/imony4 ,yet he lays claim to humility3 ,mat4 #aa3bi--8;,i am meek & l[ly 9 he>t40 ,h[ c we reconcile ) humility 8 con/ant self-ass]tion8 ,we answ] t ,jesus' self-ass]tion 0 absolutely ess5tial to 8 mission1 = he & ! tru? 7 "o3 he c\ld n ass]t ! tru? )\t ass]t+ himself1 & he c\ld n ass]t himself )\t ass]t+ ! tru?4 ,s9ce he 0 ! tru?1 he ne$$ to say s1 = m5's sake & = ! tru?'s sake1 & he c\ld be meek & l[ly 9 he>t 9 say+ s4 ,humility is n self-depreciation1 b only ! judg+ ( ourselves accord+ to ,god's p]fect /&>d4 8,humility0 is d]iv$ f 8humus04 ,x is ! com+ d[n f airy & va9 self-exploitation to ! solid gr\nd1 ! h>d-pan1 ( actual fact4 ,god requires ( u only s mu* humility z is consi/5t ) tru?4 ,! self-glorification ( ! egoti/ is nauseat+1 because x indicates gross ignorance or misrepres5tation ( self4 ,b x is a duty to be self-ass]t+1 j s f> z we repres5t ! tru? & righte\sness ( ,god4 ,!re is a noble self-ass]tion :i* is p]fectly consi/5t ) humility4 ,job mu/ /& = 8 integrity4 ,paul's humility 0 n ( ! ,uriah ,heep v>iety4 ,:5 occasion requir$1 he c\ld ass]t 8 manhood & 8 rights1 z at ,philippi & at ! ,ca/le ( ,antonia4 ,s ! ,*ri/ian %\ld frankly say out ! tru? t is 9 him4 ,ea* ,*ri/ian has an exp]i5ce ( 8 own1 & %\ld tell x to o!rs4 ,9 te/ify+ to ! tru? he is only foll[+ ! example ( 8,*ri/ ,jesus1 :o be=e ,pontius ,pilate witness$ ! good confession0 7#a ,tim4 #f3ac74 ,b4 ,nor c ,jesus' te/imony to himself be expla9$ ^u ! hypo!sis t he 0 self-deceiv$3 = ?is w\ld argue 7a7 a weakness & folly am\nt+ to positive insanity4 ,b 8 :ole "* & life exhibit a calmness1 dignity1 equipoise1 insight1 self-ma/]y1 utt]ly inconsi/5t ) su* a !ory4 ,or x w\ld argue 7b7 a self-ignorance & self-exagg]ation :i* c\ld spr+ only f ! deepe/ moral p]v]sion4 ,b ! absolute purity ( 8 consci5ce1 ! humility ( 8 _s1 ! self-d5y+ b5efic5ce ( 8 life1 %[ ?is hypo!sis to be incr$ible4 ,rog]s1 ,sup]human ,orig9 ( ! ,bible1 #ci--;,if he 7 man1 !n to dem& t all ! _w %\ld b[ d[n to him w\ld be wor?y ( scorn l t :i* we feel = "s /raw-cr[n$ mon>* ( ,b$lam4 ,=re/1 ,! ,*ri/ ( ,hi/ory & ( ,exp]i5ce1 #bb1 #gf--;,*ri/ nev] unit$ ) 8 disciples 9 pray]4 ,he w5t up into ! m\nta9 to pray1 b n to pray ) !m3 ,luke #i3ah--8;z he 0 alone pray+1 8 disciples 7 ) him40 ,! consci\sness ( prexi/5ce is ! indisp5sable precondition ( ! total dem& :i* he makes 9 ! ,synoptics4 ,adamson1 ,! ,m9d 9 ,*ri/1 #ha1 #hb--,we value ! te/imony ( ,*ri/ians to _! communion ) ,god4 ,mu* m %\ld we value ! te/imony ( ,*ri/4 ,only "o :o1 fir/ be+ div9e1 also knew t he 0 div9e1 c\ld reveal heav5ly ?+s ) ! cle>ness & c]ta9ty t belong to ! utt]ances ( ,jesus4 ,9 him we h some?+ v diff]5t f ! mom5t>y fla%es ( insight :i* leave u 9 all ! great] d>kness4 ,na%1 ,e?ics & ,revelation1 #e--8,self-respect is bottom$ ^u ! ability to become :at "o desires to be2 &1 if ! ability /eadily falls %ort ( ! task1 ! spr+s ( self-respect dry up2 ! motives ( happy & h]oic action )]4 ,sci5ce1 art1 g5]\s civic life1 & especially religion1 come to man's rescue10--%[+ him 8 true greatness & bread? ( be+ 9 ,god4 ,! ,/ate is ! individual's l>g] self4 ,humanity1 & ev5 ! univ]se1 are p>ts ( him4 ,x is ! duty ( man to enable all m5 to be m54 ,x is possible = m5 n only tru?fully b also rationally to ass]t !mselves1 ev5 9 e>?ly affairs4 ,*a?am to ! ,duke ( ,devon%ire3 8,my ,"l1 ,i believe ,i c save ?is c\ntry1 & t no "o else c40 ,leon>do da ,v9ci1 9 8 ?irtie? ye>1 to ! ,duke ( ,milan3 8,i c c>ry ?r\gh e k9d ( "w 9 sculpture1 9 clay1 m>ble1 & bronze2 also 9 pa9t+ ,i c execute ev]y?+ t c be dem&$1 z well z any "o :osoev]40 ,horace3 8,exegi monum5tum re p]5nius40 ,savage1 ,life beyond ,dea?1 #bji--;,a fam\s old m9i/] said once1 :5 a "y & zeal\s en?usia/ tri$ to get him to talk1 & fail+1 bur/ out )1 8,h y no religion at all80 8,none to speak (10 0 ! reply4 ,:5 ,jesus p]ceiv$ a t5d5cy 9 8 disciples to self-glorification1 he urg$ sil5ce2 b :5 he saw ! t5d5cy to introspection & in]tness1 he bade !m proclaim :at he _h done = !m 7,mat4 #h3d2 ,m>k #e3ai74 ,x is nev] "r = ! ,*ri/ian to proclaim himself2 b1 if ,*ri/ _h n proclaim$ himself1 ! _w c\ld nev] h be5 sav$4 ,ru% ,rhees4 ,life ( ,jesus ( ,naz>e?1 #bce-bcg--8;,9 ! tea*+ ( ,jesus1 two topics h ! lead+ place--! ,k+dom ( ,god1 & himself4 ,he s\ght to be ,"l1 r ?an ,tea*] only4 ,yet ! ,k+dom is n "o ( p[]1 national & ext]nal1 b "o ( fa!rly love & ( mutual bro!rhood40 ,did ,jesus d any?+ = effect1 or z a m]e example8 ,n s4 ,8 baptism _h mean+ = him z a consecration ( himself to dea? = ! s9s ( ! _w1 & 8 wa%+ ( ! disciples' feet 0 ! fit beg9n+ ( ! pas*al supp] & ! symbol ( 8 lay+ aside 8 heav5ly glory to purify u = ! m>riage supp] ( ! ,lamb4 ,?omas ,kempis3 8,?\ art none ! holi] because ?\ art prais$1 & none ! worse because ?\ art c5sur$4 ,:at ?\ art1 t ?\ art1 & x avails !e naught to be call$ any bett] ?an ?\ art 9 ! sight ( ,god40 ,jesus' consci\sness ( 8 absolute s9lessness & ( 8 p]fect communion ) ,god is ! /ronge/ ( te/imonies to 8 div9e nature & mission4 ,see ,!ological ,eclectic1 #d3acg2 ,liddon1 ,our ,"l's ,div9ity1 #aec2 ,j4 ,s4 ,mill1 ,essays on ,religion1 #bec2 ,"y1 ,*ri/ ( ,hi/ory2 ,div9ity ( ,jesus ,*ri/1 by ,&ov] ,pr(essors1 #cg-fb4 ,if ,jesus1 !n1 _c be *>g$ ) ei!r m5tal or moral uns\ndness1 8 te/imony mu/ be true1 & he himself mu/ be "o ) ,god & ! reveal] ( ,god to m54 ,nei!r ,confucius nor ,buddha claim$ to be div9e1 or ! organs ( div9e revelation1 ?\gh bo? 7 moral tea*]s & re=m]s4 ,zoroa/] & ,py?agoras app>5tly believ$ !mselves *>g$ ) a div9e mission1 ?\gh _! e>lie/ biograph]s wrote c5turies aft] _! dea?4 ,socrates claim$ no?+ = himself :i* 0 beyond ! p[] ( o!rs4 ,mohamm$ believ$ 8 extraord9>y /ates ( body & s\l to be due to ! action ( cele/ial be+s2 he gave =? ! ,koran z 8a w>n+ to all creatures10 & s5t a summons to ! ,k+ ( ,p]sia & ! ,emp]or ( ,con/ant9ople1 z well z to o!r pot5tates1 to accept ! religion ( ,islam2 yet he m\rn$ :5 he di$ t he c\ld n h opportunity to correct ! mi/akes ( ! ,koran & ( 8 own life4 ,= ,confucius or ,buddha1 ,zoroa/] or ,py?agoras1 ,socrates or ,mohamm$ to claim all p[] 9 heav5 & e>?1 w\ld %[ insanity or moral p]v]sion4 ,b ?is is precisely :at ,jesus claim$4 ,he 0 ei!r m5tally or morally uns\nd1 or 8 te/imony is true4 ,see ,bald5sp]g]1 ,selb/bewus/se9 ,jesu2 ,e4 ,ball5t9e1 ,*ri/ 8 own ,witness4 ,,iv4 ,! ,hi/orical ,results ( ! ,propagation ( ,scripture ,doctr9e4 #a4 ,! rapid progress ( ! gospel 9 ! fir/ c5turies ( our era %[s its div9e orig94 ,a4 ,t ,paganism %\ld h be5 9 ?ree c5turies supplant$ by ,*ri/ianity1 is an ackn[l$g$ wond] ( hi/ory4 ,! conv]sion ( ! ,roman ,empire to ,*ri/ianity 0 ! mo/ a/oni%+ revolution ( fai? & wor%ip ev] kn[n4 ,fifty ye>s aft] ! dea? ( ,*ri/1 !re 7 *ur*es 9 all ! pr9cipal cities ( ! ,roman ,empire4 ,n]o 7#cg-fh7 f\nd 7z ,tacitus decl>es7 an 8+5s multitudo0 ( ,*ri/ians to p]secute4 ,pl9y writes to ,trajan 7#eb-aag7 t !y 8p]vad$ n m]ely ! cities b ! villages & c\ntry places1 s t ! temples 7 ne>ly des]t$40 ,t]tullian 7#afj-bcj7 writes3 8,we are b ( ye/]day1 & yet we h fill$ all y\r places1 y\r cities1 y\r isl&s1 y\r ca/les1 y\r t[ns1 y\r c\ncil-h\ses1 ev5 y\r camps1 y\r tribes1 y\r s5ate1 y\r =um4 ,we h left y no?+ b y\r temples40 ,9 ! "t ( ! emp]or ,val]ian 7#bec-bfh71 ! ,*ri/ians con/itut$ half ! population ( ,rome4 ,! conv]sion ( ! emp]or ,con/ant9e 7#bgb-ccg7 br\ght ! :ole empire1 only #cjj ye>s aft] ,jesus' dea?1 "u ! ackn[l$g$ sway ( ! gospel4 ,see ,mc,ilvaine & ,alex&]1 ,evid5ces ( ,*ri/ianity4 ,b4 ,! wond] is ! great] :5 we consid] ! ob/acles to ! progress ( ,*ri/ianity3 7a7 ,! scepticism ( ! cultivat$ classes2 7b7 ! prejudice & hatr$ ( ! common p2 & 7c7 ! p]secutions set on foot by gov]nm5t4 7a7 ,mission>ies ev5 n[ f9d x difficult to get a he>+ among ! cultivat$ classes ( ! hea!n4 ,b ! gospel appe>$ 9 ! mo/ enlight5$ age ( antiquity--! ,augu/an age ( lit]ature & hi/orical inquiry4 ,tacitus call$ ! religion ( ,*ri/ 8exitiabilis sup]/itio0--8quos p] flagitia invisos vulgus ,*ri/ianos appellabat40 ,pl9y3 8,nihil aliud inv5i quam sup]/itionem pravam et immodicam40 ,if ! gospel _h be5 false1 its prea*]s w\ld n h v5tur$ into ! c5tres ( civilization & ref9em5t2 or if !y _h1 !y w\ld h be5 detect$4 7b7 ,consid] ! int]weav+ ( hea!n religions ) all ! relations ( life4 ,*ri/ians (t5 _h to meet ! furi\s zeal & bl9d rage ( ! mob1--z at ,ly/ra & ,ephesus4 7c7 ,rawl9son1 9 8 ,hi/orical ,evid5ces1 claims t ! ,catacombs ( ,rome compris$ n9e hundr$ miles ( /reets & sev5 millions ( graves )9 a p]iod ( f\r hundr$ ye>s--a f> great] numb] ?an c\ld h di$ a natural dea?--& t va/ multitudes ( ^! mu/ h be5 massacr$ = _! fai?4 ,! ,encyclopdia ,britannica1 h[ev]1 calls ! e/imate ( ,de ,m>*i1 :i* ,rawl9son appe>s to h tak5 z au?ority1 a great exagg]ation4 ,in/ead ( n9e hundr$ miles ( /reets1 ,nor?cote has ?ree hundr$ fifty4 ,! numb] ( int]m5ts to correspond w\ld be less ?an ?ree millions4 ,! ,catacombs began to be des]t$ by ! "t ( ,j]ome4 ,! times :5 !y 7 univ]sally us$ by ,*ri/ians c\ld h be5 h>dly m ?an two hundr$ ye>s4 ,!y did n beg9 9 s&-pits4 ,!re 7 ?ree sorts ( tufa3 7#a7 rocky1 us$ = qu>ry+ & too h>d = ,*ri/ian purposes2 7#b7 s&y1 us$ = s&-pits1 too s(t to p]mit con/ruction ( gall]ies & tombs2 7#c7 granul>1 t us$ by ,*ri/ians4 ,! exi/5ce ( ! ,catacombs mu/ h be5 well kn[n to ! hea!n4 ,aft] ,pope ,damasus ! exagg]at$ rev]5ce = !m began4 ,!y 7 decorat$ & improv$4 ,h5ce _m pa9t+s are ( lat] date ?an #djj1 & te/ify to papal polity1 n to t ( e>ly ,*ri/ianity4 ,! bottles conta91 n blood1 b w9e ( ! eu*>i/ celebrat$ at ! fun]al4 ,fi%]1 ,nature & ,me?od ( ,revelation1 #bef-beh1 calls att5tion to ,mat!w ,arnold's description ( ! ne$s ( ! hea!n _w1 yet 8 bl9dness to ! true rem$y3 8,on t h>d pagan _w disgu/ ,& secret loa?+ fell2 ,deep we>9ess & sat$ lu/ ,made human life a hell4 ,9 8 cool hall1 ) hagg>d eyes1 ,! ,roman noble lay2 ,he drove abroad1 9 furi\s guise1 ,along ! ,appian ,way2 ,he made a fea/1 drank fi]ce & fa/1 ,& cr[n$ 8 hair ) fl[]s1--,no easi] nor no quick] pass$ ,! impracticable h\rs40 ,yet ) m+l$ pride & sadness1 ,mr4 ,arnold fa/idi\sly rejects m heav5ly nutrim5t4 ,( ,*ri/ he says3 8,n[ he is dead6 ,f> h5ce he lies1 ,9 ! lorn ,syrian t[n1 ,& on 8 grave1 ) %9+ eyes1 ,! ,syrian />s look d[n40 ,he sees t ! millions 8,h su* ne$ ( joy1 ,& joy ^: gr\nds are true1 ,& joy t %\ld all he>ts employ ,z :5 ! pa/ 0 new60 ,! want ( ! _w is3 8,"o mighty wave ( ?\ght & joy1 ,lift+ mank9d ama940 ,b ! poet sees no gr\nd ( hope3 8,fools6 t s (t5 "h1 ,happ9ess mock$ our pray]1 ,i ?9k might make u fe> ,a l ev5t else:]e1--,make u n fly to dreams1 ,b mod]ate desire40 ,he s+s ( ! "t :5 ,*ri/ianity 0 "y3 8,oh1 _h ,i liv$ 9 t great day1 ,h[ _h its glory new ,fill$ e>? & heav51 & caught away ,my ravi%$ _s too60 ,b desolation ( _s does n br+ ) x any l[]+ ( self-e/eem1 mu* less ! humility :i* deplores ! pres5ce & p[] ( evil 9 ! s\l1 & sighs = deliv]ance4 8,!y t are :ole h no ne$ ( a physician1 b !y t are sick0 7,mat4 #i3ab74 ,reject+ ,*ri/1 ,mat!w ,arnold embodies 9 8 v]se 8! sweetness1 ! gravity1 ! /r5g?1 ! beauty1 & ! languor ( dea?0 7,hutton1 ,essays1 #cjb74 ,c4 ,! wond] becomes yet great] :5 we consid] ! natural insuffici5cy ( ! means us$ to secure ?is progress4 7a7 ,! proclaim]s ( ! gospel 7 9 g5]al unle>n$ m51 belong+ to a despis$ nation4 7b7 ,! gospel :i* !y proclaim$ 0 a gospel ( salvation ?r\gh fai? 9 a ,jew :o _h be5 put to an ignom9i\s dea?4 7c7 ,?is gospel 0 "o :i* excit$ natural repugnance1 by humbl+ m5's pride1 /rik+ at ! root ( _! s9s1 & dem&+ a life ( labor & self-sacrifice4 7d7 ,! gospel1 moreov]1 0 an exclusive "o1 suff]+ no rival & decl>+ itself to be ! univ]sal & only religion4 7a7 ,! e>ly ,*ri/ians 7 m unlikely to make conv]ts ?an mod]n ,jews are to make proselytes1 9 va/ numb]s1 9 ! pr9cipal cities ( ,europe & ,am]ica4 ,celsus call$ ,*ri/ianity 8a religion ( ! rabble40 7b7 ,! cross 0 ! ,roman gall[s--! puni%m5t ( slaves4 ,cic]o calls x 8s]vitutis extremum summumque supplicium40 7c7 ,!re 7 _m bad religions3 :y %\ld ! mild ,roman ,empire h p]secut$ ! only good "o8 ,! answ] is 9 "p3 ,p]secution did n orig9ate ) ! (ficial classes2 x proce$$ really f ! p at l>ge4 ,tacitus call$ ,*ri/ians 8hat]s ( ! human race40 ,m5 recogniz$ 9 ,*ri/ianity a foe to all _! previ\s motives1 ideals1 & aims4 ,altruism w\ld break up ! old society1 = e ef=t t c5t]$ 9 self or 9 ! pres5t life 0 /igmatiz$ by ! gospel z unwor?y4 7d7 ,hea!nism1 be+ )\t cre$ or pr9ciple1 did n c>e to propagate itself4 8,a man mu/ be v weak10 said ,celsus1 8to imag9e t ,greeks & b>b>ians1 9 ,asia1 ,europe1 & ,libya1 c ev] unite "u ! same sy/em ( religion40 ,s ! ,roman gov]nm5t w\ld all[ no religion :i* did n p>ticipate 9 ! wor%ip ( ! ,/ate4 8,keep y\rselves f idols10 8,we wor%ip no o!r ,god10 0 ! ,*ri/ian's answ]4 ,gibbon1 ,hi/4 ,decl9e & ,fall1 #a3 *ap4 #ae1 m5tions z second>y causes3 7#a7 ! zeal ( ! ,jews2 7#b7 ! doctr9e ( immortality2 7#c7 miracul\s p[]s2 7#d7 virtues ( e>ly ,*ri/ians2 7#e7 privilege ( p>ticipation 9 *ur* gov]nm5t4 ,b ^! causes 7 only second>y1 & all w\ld h be5 insuffici5t )\t an inv9cible p]suasion ( ! tru? ( ,*ri/ianity4 ,= answ] to ,gibbon1 see ,p]rone1 ,prelectiones ,!ologic1 #a3acc4 ,p]secution de/roys falsehood by lead+ its advocates to inve/igate ! gr\nds ( _! belief2 b x /r5g!ns & multiplies tru? by lead+ its advocates to see m cle>ly ! f\ndations ( _! fai?4 ,!re h be5 _m consci5ti\s p]secutors3 ,john #af3b--8,!y %all put y out ( ! synagogues3 yea1 ! h\r come?1 t :osoev] kille? y %all ?9k t he (f]e? s]vice unto ,god40 ,! ,decretal ( ,pope ,urban ,,ii reads3 8,= we d n c\nt !m to be homicides1 to :om x may h happ5$1 ?r\gh _! burn+ zeal aga9/ ! excommunicat$1 to put any ( !m to dea?40 ,/4 ,l\is1 ,k+ ( ,france1 urg$ 8 (fic]s 8n to argue ) ! infidel1 b to subdue unbeliev]s by ?ru/+ ! sword into !m z f> z x w g40 ,( ! use ( ! rack 9 ,engl& on a c]ta9 occasion1 x 0 said t x 0 us$ ) all ! t5d]ness :i* ! nature ( ! in/rum5t w\ld all[4 ,?is rem9ds u ( ,isaak ,walton's in/ruction z to ! use ( ! frog3 8,put ! hook ?r\gh 8 m\? & out at 8 gills2 &1 9 s do+1 use him z ?\gh y lov$ him40 ,rob]t ,br[n+1 9 8 ,ea/] ,day1 #bge-bhh1 gives u :at purports to be ,a ,m>tyr's ,epitaph1 inscrib$ ^u a wall ( ! ,catacombs1 :i* furni%es a valuable contra/ to ! sceptical & pessimi/ic /ra9 ( ,mat!w ,arnold3 8,i 0 born sickly1 poor & mean1 ,a slave3 no mis]y c\ld scre5 ,! hold]s ( ! pe>l ( price f ,cs>'s envy3 !re=e twice ,i f\ght ) bea/s1 & ?ree times saw ,my *ildr5 suff] by 8 law2 ,at l5g? my own release 0 e>n$3 ,i 0 "s "t 9 be+ burn$1 ,b at ! close a ,h& came ?r\gh ,! fire above my head1 & drew ,my s\l to ,*ri/1 :om n[ ,i see4 ,s]gius1 a bro!r1 writes = me ,?is te/imony on ! wall--,= me1 ,i h =got x all40 ,! progress ( a religion s unprepossess+ & uncompromis+ to outw>d acceptance & dom9ion1 )9 ! space ( ?ree hundr$ ye>s1 _c be expla9$ )\t suppos+ t div9e p[] att5d$ its promulgation1 & !re=e t ! gospel is a revelation f ,god4 ,/anley1 ,life & ,lett]s1 #a3ebg--8;,9 ! ,kreml9 ,ca!dral1 :5ev] ! ,metropolitan advanc$ f ! alt> to give 8 bless+1 !re 0 always ?r[n "u 8 feet a c>pet embroid]$ ) ! eagle ( old ,pagan ,rome1 to indicate t ! ,*ri/ian ,*ur* & ,empire ( ,con/ant9ople _h succe$$ & triumph$ ov] x40 ,on ?is :ole section1 see ,f4 ,w4 ,f>r>1 ,witness ( ,hi/ory to ,*ri/1 #ia2 ,mc,ilvaine1 ,wisdom ( ,holy ,scripture1 #aci4 #b4 ,! b5efic5t influ5ce ( ! ,scripture doctr9es & precepts1 :]ev] !y h _h sway1 %[s _! div9e orig94 ,notice3 ,a4 ,_! influ5ce on civilization 9 g5]al1 secur+ a recognition ( pr9ciples :i* hea!nism ignor$1 su* z ,g>bett m5tions3 7a7 ! importance ( ! individual2 7b7 ! law ( mutual love2 7c7 ! sacr$ness ( human life2 7d7 ! doctr9e ( int]nal hol9ess2 7e7 ! sanctity ( home2 7f7 monogamy1 & ! religi\s equality ( ! sexes2 7g7 id5tification ( belief & practice4 ,! cont9u$ corruption ( hea!n l&s %[s t ?is *ange is n due to any laws ( m]ely natural progress4 ,! confessions ( anci5t writ]s %[ t x is n due to philosophy4 ,its only explanation is t ! gospel is ! p[] ( ,god4 ,g>bett1 ,dogmatic ,fai?1 #agg-ahf2 ,f4 ,w4 ,f>r>1 ,witness ( ,hi/ory to ,*ri/1 *ap4 on ,*ri/ianity & ! ,individual2 ,brace1 ,ge/a ,*ri/i1 preface1 vi--8,practices & pr9ciples implant$1 /imulat$ or support$ by ,*ri/ianity1 su* z reg>d = ! p]sonality ( ! weake/ & poore/2 respect = woman2 duty ( ea* memb] ( ! =tunate classes to raise up ! un=tunate2 humanity to ! *ild1 ! prison]1 ! /rang]1 ! ne$y1 & ev5 to ! brute2 unceas+ opposition to all =ms ( cruelty1 oppression & slav]y2 ! duty ( p]sonal purity1 & ! sacr$ness ( m>riage2 ! necessity ( temp]ance2 obligation ( a m equitable division ( ! pr(its ( labor1 & ( great] cop]ation betwe5 employ]s & employ$2 ! "r ( e human be+ to h ! utmo/ opportunity ( develop+ 8 faculties1 & ( all p]sons to enjoy equal political & social privileges2 ! pr9ciple t ! injury ( "o nation is ! injury ( all1 & ! exp$i5cy & duty ( unre/rict$ trade & int]c\rse betwe5 all c\ntries2 & f9ally1 a pr(\nd opposition to w>1 a det]m9ation to limit its evils :5 exi/+1 & to prev5t its aris+ by means ( int]national arbitration40 ,max ,mll]3 8,! concept ( humanity is ! gift ( ,*ri/40 ,guizot1 ,hi/ory ( ,civilization1 #a3 ,introd41 tells u t 9 anci5t times ! individual exi/$ = ! sake ( ! ,/ate2 9 mod]n times ! ,/ate exi/s = ! sake ( ! individual4 8,! individual is a discov]y ( ,*ri/40 ,on ! relations betwe5 ,*ri/ianity & ,political ,economy1 see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,philosophy & ,religion1 pages #ddc-dfj2 on ! cause ( ! *ang$ view ) reg>d to ! relation ( ! individual to ! ,/ate1 see page #bjg--8,:at has wr\ght ! *ange8 ,no?+ b ! dea? ( ! ,son ( ,god4 ,:5 x 0 se5 t ! smalle/ *ild & ! l[e/ slave _h a s\l ( su* wor? t ,*ri/ left 8 ?rone & gave up 8 life to save x1 ! _w's e/imate ( values *ang$1 & mod]n hi/ory began40 ,lucian1 ! ,greek satiri/ & humori/1 #afj ,a4 ,d41 said ( ! ,*ri/ians3 8,_! fir/ legislator ,jesus has put x into _! heads t !y are all bro!rs40 ,x is ?is _s ( common bro!rhood :i* has l$ 9 mo/ c\ntries to ! abolition ( cannibalism1 infanticide1 wid[-burn+1 & slav]y4 ,pr9ce ,bism>ck3 8,= social well-be+ ,i ask no?+ m ?an ,*ri/ianity )\t phrases0--:i* means ! religion ( ! de$ r ?an ( ! cre$4 ,yet x is only fai? 9 ! hi/oric revelation ( ,god 9 ,*ri/ :i* has made ,*ri/ian de$s possible4 ,%al]1 ,int]pretation ( ,nature1 #bcb-bgh--;,ari/otle1 if he c\ld look ov] society to-day1 w\ld ?9k mod]n man a new species1 9 8 go+ out 9 sympa?y to di/ant peoples4 ,?is _c be ! result ( natural selection1 = self-sacrifice is n pr(itable to ! individual4 ,altrui/ic emotions owe _! exi/5ce to ,god4 ,wor%ip ( ,god has fl[$ back ^u man's emotions & has made !m m sympa!tic4 ,self-consci\sness & sympa?y1 com+ into conflict ) brute emotions1 orig9ate ! s5se ( s94 ,!n beg9s ! w> ( ! natural & ! spiritual4 ,love ( nature & absorption 9 o!rs is ! true ,nirvana4 ,n physical sci5ce1 b ! humanities1 are mo/ ne$$ 9 education4 ,h4 ,e4 ,h]sey1 ,introd4 to ,br[n+'s ,*ri/mas ,eve1 #ai-- 8,sidney ,lani] tells u t ! la/ tw5ty c5turies h sp5t _! be/ p[] ^u ! developm5t ( p]sonality4 ,lit]ature1 education1 gov]nm5t1 & religion1 h le>n$ to recognize ! individual z ! unit ( =ce4 ,br[n+ goes a /ep fur!r4 ,he decl>es t s p[]ful is a complete p]sonality t its v t\* gives life & c\rage & pot5cy4 ,he turns to hi/ory = ! inspiration ( endur+ virtue & ! /imulus = su/a9$ ef=t1 & he f9ds bo? 9 ,jesus ,*ri/40 ,j4 ,p4 ,cooke1 ,cr$5tials ( ,sci5ce1 #dc--,! *ange f ! anci5t philosoph] to ! mod]n inve/igator is ! *ange f self-ass]tion to self-devotion1 & ! great revolution c be trac$ to ! influ5ce ( ,*ri/ianity & to ! _s ( humility exhibit$ & inculcat$ by ,*ri/4 ,lewes1 ,hi/4 ,philos41 #a3djh--;,greek morality nev] embrac$ any conception ( humanity2 no ,greek ev] atta9$ to ! sublimity ( su* a po9t ( view4 ,kidd1 ,social ,evolution1 #afe1 #bhg--;,x is n intellect t has pu%$ =w>d ! _w ( mod]n times3 x is ! altrui/ic feel+ t orig9at$ 9 ! cross & sacrifice ( ,*ri/4 ,! ,fr5* ,revolution 0 made possible by ! fact t humanit>ian ideas _h und]m9$ ! upp] classes !mselves1 & effective resi/ance 0 impossible4 ,socialism w\ld aboli% ! /ruggle = exi/5ce on ! "p ( individuals4 ,:at security w\ld be left = social progress8 ,remov+ all re/rictions ^u population ensures progressive det]ioration4 ,a non-sociali/ community w\ld out/rip a sociali/ community :]e all ! ma9 wants ( life 7 secure4 ,! real t5d5cy ( society is to br+ all ! p into rivalry1 n only on a foot+ ( political equality1 b on conditions ( equal social opportunities4 ,! ,/ate 9 future w int]f]e & control1 9 ord] to pres]ve or secure free competition1 r ?an to susp5d x4 ,! goal is n socialism or ,/ate managem5t1 b competition 9 :i* all %all h equal advantages4 ,! evolution ( human society is n prim>ily intellectual b religi\s4 ,! w9n+ races are ! religi\s races4 ,! ,greeks _h m intellect1 b we h m civilization & progress4 ,! ,a!nians 7 z f> above u z we are above ! negro race4 ,glad/one said t we are intellectually weak] ?an ! m5 ( ! middle ages4 ,:5 ! intellectual developm5t ( any section ( ! race has = ! "t be+ outrun its e?ical developm5t1 natural selection has app>5tly we$$ x out1 l any o!r unsuitable product4 ,evolution is develop+ rev]5ce1 ) its alli$ qualities1 m5tal en]gy1 resolution1 ent]prise1 prolong$ & conc5trat$ application1 simple m9d$ & s+le m9d$ devotion to duty4 ,only religion c ov]p[] selfi%ness & individualism & ensure social progress4 ,b4 ,_! influ5ce ^u individual "* & happ9ess1 :]ev] !y h be5 te/$ 9 practice4 ,?is influ5ce is se5 7a7 9 ! moral trans=mations !y h wr\ght--z 9 ! case ( ,paul ! apo/le1 & ( p]sons 9 e ,*ri/ian community2 7b7 9 ! self-d5y+ labors = human welf>e to :i* !y h l$--z 9 ! case ( ,wilb]=ce & ,judson2 7c7 9 ! hopes !y h inspir$ 9 times ( sorr[ & dea?4 ,^! b5efic5t fruits _c h _! s\rce 9 m]ely natural causes1 ap>t f ! tru? & div9ity ( ! ,scriptures2 = 9 t case ! contr>y beliefs w\ld be accompani$ by ! same bless+s4 ,b s9ce we f9d ^! bless+s only 9 connection ) ,*ri/ian tea*+1 we may ju/ly consid] ?is z _! cause4 ,?is tea*+1 !n1 mu/ be true1 & ! ,scriptures mu/ be a div9e revelation4 ,else ,god has made a lie to be ! greate/ bless+ to ! race4 ,! fir/ ,moravian mission>ies to ! ,we/ ,indies walk$ six hundr$ miles to take %ip1 work$ _! passage1 & !n sold !mselves z slaves1 9 ord] to get ! privilege ( prea*+ to ! negroes4444 ,! fa!r ( ,john ,g4 ,paton 0 a /ock+-weav]4 ,! :ole family1 ) ! exception ( ! v small *ildr51 work$ f #f a4 m4 to #aj p4 m41 ) "o h\r = d9n] at noon & a half h\r ea* = breakfa/ & supp]4 ,yet family pray] 0 regul>ly held twice a day4 ,9 ^! brea?+-spells = daily meals ,john ,g4 ,paton took "p ( 8 "t to /udy ! ,lat9 ,gramm>1 t he might prep>e himself = mission>y "w4 ,:5 told by an uncle t1 if he w5t to ! ,new ,hebrides1 ! cannibals w\ld eat him1 he repli$3 8,y y\rself w soon be dead & buri$1 & ,i _h z lief be eat5 by cannibals z by worms40 ,! ,aneityumese rais$ arr[-root = fifte5 ye>s & sold x to pay ! #abjj requir$ = pr9t+ ! ,bible 9 _! own language4 ,univ]sal *ur*-att5dance & ,bible-/udy make ^? ,s\? ,sea ,isl&s ! mo/ heav5ly place on e>? on ! ,sabba?-day4 ,9 #ahci1 tw5ty ?\s& negroes 9 ,jamaica ga!r$ to beg9 a life ( fre$om4 ,into a c(f9 7 put ! h&cuffs & %ackles ( slav]y1 relics ( ! :ipp+-po/ & ! sc\rge4 ,z ! clock /ruck twelve at night1 a prea*] cri$ ) ! fir/ /roke3 8,! mon/] is dy+60 & s ) e /roke until ! la/1 :5 he cri$3 8,! mon/] is dead60 ,!n all rose f _! knees & sang3 8,praise ,god f :om all bless+s fl[60444 8,:at d y d t =80 said ! sick ,*9aman :om ! m$ical mission>y 0 tuck+ up 9 b$ ) a c>e :i* ! pati5t _h nev] receiv$ s9ce he 0 a baby4 ,! mission>y took ! opportunity to tell him ( ! love ( ,*ri/4444 ,! ag$ ,au/ralian "m1 :5 told t h] two daught]s1 mission>ies 9 ,*9a1 _h bo? ( !m be5 murd]$ by a hea!n mob1 only repli$3 8,?is decides me2 ,i w g to ,*9a n[ myself1 & try to tea* ^? poor creatures :at ! love ( ,jesus means40444 ,dr4 ,william ,a%more3 8,let "o mission>y die1 & t5 come to 8 fun]al40 ,a %oemak]1 tea*+ neglect$ boys & girls :ile he work$ at 8 cobbl]'s b5*1 gave ! impulse to ,?omas ,gu?rie's life ( fai?4 ,we mu/ judge religions n by _! ideals1 b by _! p]=mances4 ,om> ,khayyam & ,mozoomd> give u beautiful ?\ghts1 b ! =m] is n ,p]sia1 nor is ! latt] ,india4 8,:5 ! microscopic se>* ( scepticism1 :i* has hunt$ ! heav5s & s\nd$ ! seas to disprove ! exi/5ce ( a ,creator1 has turn$ its att5tion to human society & has f\nd on ?is planet a place t5 miles squ>e :]e a dec5t man c live 9 dec5cy1 com=t1 & security1 support+ & educat+ 8 *ildr51 unspoil$ & unpollut$2 a place :]e age is rev]5c$1 infancy protect$1 manhood respect$1 womanhood honor$1 & human life held 9 due reg>d--:5 sceptics c f9d su* a place t5 miles squ>e on ?is globe1 :]e ! gospel ( ,*ri/ has n gone & cle>$ ! way & laid ! f\ndations & made dec5cy & security possible1 x w !n be 9 ord] = ! sceptical lit]ati to move ?i!r & to v5tilate _! views4 ,b s long z ^! v m5 are dep5d5t ^u ! v religion !y disc>d = e privilege !y enjoy1 !y may well hesitate be=e !y rob ! ,*ri/ian ( 8 hope & humanity ( its fai? 9 t ,savior :o alone has giv5 t hope ( et]nal life :i* makes life tol]able & society possible1 & robs dea? ( its t]rors & ! grave ( its gloom40 ,on ! b5efic5t influ5ce ( ! gospel1 see ,s*midt1 ,social ,results ( ,e>ly ,*ri/ianity2 ,d4 ,j4 ,hill1 ,! ,social ,influ5ce ( ,*ri/ianity4 ,*apt] ,,iii4 ,inspiration ,( ,! ,scriptures4 ,i4 ,def9ition ( ,inspiration4 ,inspiration is t influ5ce ( ! ,_s ( ,god ^u ! m9ds ( ! ,scripture writ]s :i* made _! writ+s ! record ( a progressive div9e revelation1 suffici5t1 :5 tak5 toge!r & int]pret$ by ! same ,_s :o inspir$ !m1 to lead e hone/ inquir] to ,*ri/ & to salvation4 ,notice ! significance ( ea* "p ( ?is def9ition3 #a4 ,inspiration is an influ5ce ( ! ,_s ( ,god4 ,x is n a m]ely naturali/ic ph5om5on or psy*ological vag>y1 b is r ! effect ( ! inwork+ ( ! p]sonal div9e ,_s4 #b4 ,yet inspiration is an influ5ce ^u ! m9d1 & n ^u ! body4 ,god secures 8 end by awak5+ man's rational p[]s1 & n by an ext]nal or me*anical communication4 #c4 ,! writ+s ( inspir$ m5 are ! record ( a revelation4 ,!y are n !mselves ! revelation4 #d4 ,! revelation & ! record are bo? progressive4 ,nei!r "o is complete at ! beg9n+4 #e4 ,! ,scripture writ+s mu/ be tak5 toge!r4 ,ea* "p mu/ be view$ 9 connection ) :at prec$es & ) :at foll[s4 #f4 ,! same ,holy ,_s :o made ! orig9al revelations mu/ int]pret to u ! record ( !m1 if we are to come to ! k ( ! tru?4 #g4 ,s us$ & s int]pret$1 ^! writ+s are suffici5t1 bo? 9 quantity & 9 quality1 = _! religi\s purpose4 #h4 ,t purpose is1 n to furni% u ) a model hi/ory or ) ! facts ( sci5ce1 b to lead u to ,*ri/ & to salvation4 7a7 ,inspiration is !re=e to be def9$1 n by its me?od1 b by its result4 ,x is a g5]al t]m includ+ all ^? k9ds & degrees ( ! ,holy ,_s's influ5ce :i* 7 br\ght to be> ^u ! m9ds ( ! ,scripture writ]s1 9 ord] to secure ! putt+ into p]man5t & writt5 =m ( ! tru? be/ adapt$ to man's moral & religi\s ne$s4 7b7 ,inspiration may (t5 include revelation1 or ! direct communication f ,god ( tru? to :i* man c\ld n atta9 by 8 unaid$ p[]s4 ,x may include illum9ation1 or ! quick5+ ( man's cognitive p[]s to und]/& tru? already reveal$4 ,inspiration1 h[ev]1 does n necess>ily & always include ei!r revelation or illum9ation4 ,x is simply ! div9e influ5ce :i* secures a transmission ( ne$$ tru? to ! future1 &1 accord+ to ! nature ( ! tru? to be transmitt$1 x may be only an inspiration ( sup]9t5d5ce1 or x may be also & at ! same "t an inspiration ( illum9ation or revelation4 7c7 ,x is n d5i$1 b affirm$1 t inspiration may qualify = oral utt]ance ( tru?1 or = wise lead]%ip & d>+ de$s4 ,m5 may be inspir$ to r5d] ext]nal s]vice to ,god's k+dom1 z 9 ! cases ( ,bezalel & ,samson2 ev5 ?\gh ?is s]vice is r5d]$ unwill+ly or unconsci\sly1 z 9 ! cases ( ,balaam & ,cyrus4 ,all human intellig5ce1 inde$1 is due to ! inbrea?+ ( t same ,_s :o creat$ man at ! beg9n+4 ,we are n[ conc]n$ ) inspiration1 h[ev]1 only z x p]ta9s to ! au?or%ip ( ,scripture4 ,g54 #b3g--8;,& ,jehovah ,god =m$ man ( ! du/ ( ! gr\nd1 & brea!d into 8 no/rils ! brea? ( life2 & man became a liv+ s\l02 ,ex4 #ca3b1 #c--8;,i h call$ by "n ,bezalel 444 & ,i h fill$ him ) ! ,_s ( ,god 444 9 all mann] ( workman%ip02 ,judges #ac3bd1 #be--8;call$ 8 "n ,samson3 & ! *ild grew1 & ,jehovah bless$ him4 ,& ! ,_s ( ,jehovah began to move him02 ,num4 #bc3e--8;,& ,jehovah put a ^w 9 ,balaam's m\?1 & said1 ,return unto ,balak1 & ?us %alt ?\ speak02 #b ,*ron4 #cf3bb--8;,jehovah /irr$ up ! _s ( ,cyrus02 ,is4 #dd3bh--8t sai? ( ,cyrus1 ,he is my %eph]d02 #de3e--8;,i w gird !e1 ?\gh ?\ ha/ n kn[n me02 ,job #cb3h--8!re is a _s 9 man1 & ! brea? ( ! ,almighty give? !m und]/&+40 ,^! passages %[ ! true mean+ ( #b ,tim4 #c3af--8;,e scripture inspir$ ( ,god40 ,! ^w is to be und]/ood z allud+1 n to ! flute-play]'s brea?+ into 8 in/rum5t1 b to ,god's orig9al inbrea?+ ( life4 ,! flute is passive1 b man's s\l is active4 ,! flute gives out only :at x receives1 b ! inspir$ man "u ! div9e influ5ce is a consci\s & free orig9ator ( ?\ght & expression4 ,al?\gh ! inspiration ( :i* we are to treat is simply ! inspiration ( ! ,scripture writ+s1 we c be/ und]/& ?is n>r[] use ( ! t]m by rememb]+ t all real k has 9 x a div9e elem5t1 & t we are possess$ ( complete consci\sness only z we live1 move1 & h our be+ 9 ,god4 ,s9ce ,*ri/1 ! div9e ,logos or ,reason1 is 8! light :i* lighte? e man0 7,john #a3i71 a special influ5ce ( 8! _s ( ,*ri/ :i* 0 9 !m0 7#a ,pet4 #a3aa7 rationally acc\nts = ! fact t 8m5 spake f ,god1 be+ mov$ by ! ,holy ,_s0 7#b ,pet4 #a3ba74 ,x may help our und]/&+ ( t]ms above employ$ if we adduce in/ances ( 7#a7 ,inspiration )\t revelation1 z 9 ,luke or ,acts1 ,luke #a3a-c2 7#b7 ,inspiration includ+ revelation1 z 9 ! ,apocalypse1 ,rev4 #a3a1 #aa2 7#c7 ,inspiration )\t illum9ation1 z 9 ! prophets1 #a ,pet4 #a3aa2 7#d7 ,inspiration includ+ illum9ation1 z 9 ! case ( ,paul1 #a ,cor4 #b3ab2 7#e7 ,revelation )\t inspiration1 z 9 ,god's words f ,s9ai1 ,ex4 #bj3a1 #bb2 7#f7 ,illum9ation )\t inspiration1 z 9 mod]n prea*]s1 ,eph4 #b3bj4 ,o!r def9itions are ^? ( ,p>k3 8,inspiration is su* an influ5ce ov] ! writ]s ( ! ,bible t all _! tea*+s :i* h a religi\s "* are tru/wor?y02 ( ,wilk9son3 8,inspiration is help f ,god to keep ! report ( div9e revelation free f error4 ,help to :om8 ,no matt] to :om1 s ! result is secur$4 ,! f9al result1 viz43 ! record or report ( revelation1 ?is mu/ be free f error4 ,inspiration may affect "o or all ( ! ag5ts employ$02 ( ,hovey3 8,inspiration 0 an influ5ce ( ! ,_s ( ,god on ^? p[]s ( m5 :i* are conc]n$ 9 ! reception1 ret5tion & expression ( religi\s tru?--an influ5ce s p]vad+ & p[]ful t ! tea*+ ( inspir$ m5 0 accord+ to ! m9d ( ,god4 ,_! tea*+ did n 9 any in/ance embrace all tru? 9 respect to ,god1 or man1 or ! way ( life2 b x compris$ j s mu* ( ! tru? on any p>ticul> subject z c\ld be receiv$ 9 fai? by ! inspir$ tea*] & made useful to ^? :om he address$4 ,9 ?is s5se ! tea*+ ( ! orig9al docum5ts compos+ our ,bible may be pron\nc$ free f error02 ( ,g4 ,b4 ,fo/]3 8,revelation is ! action ( ,god 9 ! s\l ( 8 *ild1 result+ 9 div9e self-expression !re3 ,inspiration is ! action ( ,god 9 ! s\l ( 8 *ild1 result+ 9 appreh5sion & appropriation ( ! div9e expression4 ,revelation has logical b n *ronological priority02 ( ,horton1 ,inspiration & ! ,bible1 #aj-ac--8,we mean by ,inspiration exactly ^? qualities or *>act]i/ics :i* are ! m>ks or notes ( ! ,bible4444 ,we call our ,bible inspir$2 by :i* we mean t by read+ & /udy+ x we f9d our way to ,god1 we f9d 8 w = u1 & we f9d h[ we c con=m ourselves to 8 w40 ,fairbairn1 ,*ri/ 9 ,mod]n ,!ology1 #dif1 :ile nobly sett+ =? ! naturalness ( revelation1 has misconceiv$ ! relation ( inspiration to revelation by giv+ priority to ! =m]3 8,! idea ( a writt5 revelation may be said to be logically involv$ 9 ! notion ( a liv+ ,god4 ,spee* is natural to _s2 & if ,god is by nature _s1 x w be to him a matt] ( nature to reveal himself4 ,b if he speaks to man1 x w be ?r\gh m52 & ^? :o he> be/ w be mo/ possess$ ( ,god4 ,?is possession is t]m$ #8inspiration4' ,god inspires1 man reveals3 revelation is ! mode or =m--^w1 "*1 or in/itution--9 :i* man embodies :at he has receiv$4 ,! t]ms1 ?\gh n equival5t1 are co-ext5sive1 ! "o d5ot+ ! process on its inn] side1 ! o!r on its out]40 ,?is /atem5t1 al?\gh approv$ by ,s&ay1 ,inspiration1 #abd1 #abe1 seems to u almo/ precisely to rev]se ! "r mean+ ( ! words4 ,we pref] ! view ( ,evans1 ,bib4 ,s*ol>%ip & ,inspiration1 #ed--8;,god has fir/ reveal$ himself1 & !n has inspir$ m5 to int]pret1 record & apply ?is revelation4 ,9 r$emption1 inspiration is ! =mal factor1 z revelation is ! mat]ial factor4 ,! m5 are inspir$1 z ,pr(4 ,/[e said4 ,! ?\ghts are inspir$1 z ,pr(4 ,briggs said4 ,! words are inspir$1 z ,pr(4 ,hodge said4 ,! w>p & wo( ( ! ,bible is 3 #8! words t ,i h spok5 unto y are _s' 7,john #f3fc74 ,its fr+es run (f1 z 0 inevitable1 into ! secul>1 ! mat]ial1 ! psy*ic40 ,phillips ,brooks1 ,life1 #b3cea--8;,if ! true revelation ( ,god is 9 ,*ri/1 ! ,bible is n prop]ly a revelation1 b ! hi/ory ( a revelation4 ,?is is n only a fact b a necessity1 = a p]son _c be reveal$ 9 a book1 b mu/ f9d revelation1 if at all1 9 a p]son4 ,! c5tre & core ( ! ,bible mu/ !re=e be ! gospels1 z ! /ory ( ,jesus40 ,"s1 l ,prie/ley1 h held t ! gospels are au!ntic b n inspir$4 ,we !re=e add to ! pro( ( ! g5u95ess & cr$ibility ( ,scripture1 ! pro( ( its inspiration4 ,*adwick1 ,old & ,new ,unit>ianism1 #aa--8,prie/ley's belief 9 sup]natural revelation 0 int5se4 ,he _h an absolute di/ru/ ( reason z qualifi$ to furni% an adequate k ( religi\s ?+s1 & at ! same "t a p]fect confid5ce 9 reason z qualifi$ to prove t negative & to det]m9e ! cont5ts ( ! revelation40 ,we might claim ! hi/orical tru? ( ! gospels1 ev5 if we did n call !m inspir$4 ,gore1 9 ,lux ,mundi1 #cda--8;,*ri/ianity br+s ) x a doctr9e ( ! inspiration ( ! ,holy ,scriptures1 b is n bas$ ^u x40 ,w>field & ,hodge1 ,inspiration1 #h--8,:ile ! inspiration ( ! ,scriptures is true1 & be+ true is fundam5tal to ! adequate int]pretation ( ,scripture1 x nev]!less is n1 9 ! fir/ in/ance1 a pr9ciple fundam5tal to ! tru? ( ! ,*ri/ian religion40 ,on ! idea ( ,revelation1 see ,ladd1 9 ,j\rn4 ,*ri/4 ,philos41 ,jan4 #ahhc3aef-agh2 on ,inspiration1 ibid41 ,apr4 #ahhc3bbe-bdh4 ,see ,h5d]son on ,inspiration 7#bnd ed471 #eh1 #bje1 #bdi1 #cjc1 #caj4 ,= o!r works on ! g5]al subject ( ,inspiration1 see ,lee1 ,bann]man1 ,jamieson1 ,macnaught2 ,g>bett1 ,god's ,^w ,writt52 ,aids to ,fai?1 essay on ,inspiration4 ,also1 ,philippi1 ,glaub5slehre1 #a3bje2 ,we/cott1 ,introd4 to ,/udy ( ! ,gospels1 #bg-fe2 ,bib4 ,sac41 #a3ig2 #d3aed2 #ab3bag2 #ae3bi1 #cad2 #be3aib-aih2 ,dr4 ,b>r[s1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahfg3eic2 #ahgb3dbh2 ,f>r>1 ,sci5ce 9 ,!ology1 #bjh2 ,hodge & ,w>field1 9 ,presb4 ,rev41 ,apr4 #ahha3bbe-bfa2 ,manly1 ,! ,bible ,doctr9e ( ,inspiration2 ,watts1 ,inspiration2 ,mead1 ,sup]natural ,revelation1 #cej2 ,:iton1 ,gloria ,patri1 #acf2 ,ha/+s1 ,bible ,dict41 #a3bif-bii2 ,s&ay1 ,bampton ,lectures on ,inspiration4 ,,ii4 ,pro( ( ,inspiration4 #a4 ,s9ce we h %[n t ,god has made a revelation ( himself to man1 we may reasonably presume t he w n tru/ ?is revelation :olly to human tradition & misrepres5tation1 b w also provide a record ( x ess5tially tru/wor?y & suffici5t2 9 o!r words1 t ! same ,_s :o orig9ally communicat$ ! tru? w preside ov] its publication1 s f> z is ne$$ to accompli% its religi\s purpose4 ,s9ce all natural intellig5ce1 z we h se51 presupposes ,god's indwell+1 & s9ce 9 ,scripture ! all-prevail+ atmosph]e1 ) its con/ant pressure & ef=t to ent] e cranny & corn] ( ! _w1 is us$ z an illu/ration ( ! impulse ( ,god's omnipot5t ,_s to vivify & en]gize e human s\l 7,g54 #b3g2 ,job #cb3h71 we may inf] t1 b = s91 all m5 w\ld be morally & spiritually inspir$ 7,num4 #aa3bi--8,w\ld t all ,jehovah's p 7 prophets1 t ,jehovah w\ld put 8 ,_s ^u !m60 ,is4 #ei3b--8y\r iniquities h sep>at$ betwe5 y & y\r ,god074 ,we h also se5 t ,god's me?od ( communicat+ 8 tru? 9 matt]s ( religion is presumably analog\s to 8 me?od ( communicat+ secul> tru?1 su* z t ( a/ronomy or hi/ory4 ,!re is an orig9al deliv]y to a s+le nation1 & to s+le p]sons 9 t nation1 t x may ?r\gh !m be giv5 to mank9d4 ,s&ay1 ,inspiration1 #adj--8,!re is a #8purpose ( ,god accord+ to selection' 7,rom4 #i3aa72 !re is an #8election' or #8selection ( grace'2 & ! object ( t selection 0 ,israel & ^? :o take _! "n f ,israel's ,messiah4 ,if a t[] is built 9 asc5d+ ti]s1 ^? :o /& ^u ! l[] ti]s are yet rais$ above ! gr\nd1 & "s may be rais$ high] ?an o!rs1 b ! full & unimp$$ view is res]v$ = ^? :o m\nt upw>d to ! top4 ,& t is ! place de/9$ = u if we w take x40 ,if we foll[ ! analogy ( ,god's work+ 9 o!r communications ( k1 we %all reasonably presume t he w pres]ve ! record ( 8 revelations 9 writt5 & accessible docum5ts1 h&$ d[n f ^? to :om ^! revelations 7 fir/ communicat$1 & we may expect t ^! docum5ts w be kept suffici5tly correct & tru/wor?y to accompli% _! religi\s purpose1 namely1 t ( furni%+ to ! hone/ inquir] a guide to ,*ri/ & to salvation4 ,! physician commits 8 prescriptions to writ+2 ! ,cl]k ( ,congress records its proce$+s2 ! ,/ate ,dep>tm5t ( our gov]nm5t in/ructs our =eign ambassadors1 n orally1 b by dispat*es4 ,!re is yet great] ne$ t revelation %\ld be record$1 s9ce x is to be transmitt$ to di/ant ages2 x conta9s long disc\rses2 x embraces my/]i\s doctr9es4 ,jesus did n write himself2 = he 0 ! subject1 n ! m]e *annel1 ( revelation4 ,8 unconc]n ab\t ! apo/les' imm$iately committ+ to writ+ :at !y saw & he>d is inexplicable1 if he did n expect t inspiration w\ld assi/ !m4 ,we come to ! discussion ( ,inspiration ) a presumption q unlike t ( ,ku55 & ,wellhaus51 :o write 9 ! int]e/ ( almo/ av[$ naturalism4 ,ku551 9 ! op5+ s5t5ces ( 8 ,religion ( ,israel1 does inde$ ass]t ! rule ( ,god 9 ! _w4 ,b ,s&ay1 ,inspiration1 #aag1 says well t 8,ku55 keeps ?is idea v mu* 9 ! backgr\nd4 ,he exp5d$ a :ole volume ( #eic l>ge octavo pages 7,prophets & ,prophecy 9 ,israel1 ,london1 #ahgg7 9 prov+ t ! prophets 7 n mov$ to speak by ,god1 b t _! utt]ances 7 all _! own40 ,! foll[+ extract1 says ,s&ay1 indicates ! position :i* ,dr4 ,ku55 really held3 8,we d n all[ ourselves to be depriv$ ( ,god's pres5ce 9 hi/ory4 ,9 ! =tunes & developm5t ( nations1 & n lea/ cle>ly 9 ^? ( ,israel1 we see ,him1 ! holy & all-wise ,in/ructor ( 8 human *ildr54 ,b ! old contra/s mu/ be altoge!r set aside4 ,s long z we d]ive a sep>ate "p ( ,israel's religi\s life directly f ,god1 & all[ ! sup]natural or imm$iate revelation to int]v5e 9 ev5 "o s+le po9t1 s long also our view ( ! :ole cont9ues to be incorrect1 & we see ourselves "h & !re necessitat$ to d viol5ce to ! well-au!nticat$ cont5ts ( ! hi/orical docum5ts4 ,x is ! supposition ( a natural developm5t alone :i* acc\nts = all ! ph5om5a0 7,ku551 ,prophets & ,prophecy 9 ,israel1 #ehe74 #b4 ,jesus1 :o has be5 prov$ to be n only a cr$ible witness1 b a mess5g] f ,god1 v\*es = ! inspiration ( ! ,old ,te/am5t1 by quot+ x ) ! =mula3 8,x is writt502 by decl>+ t 8"o jot or "o tittle0 ( x 8%all 9 no wise pass away10 & t 8! ,scripture _c be brok540 ,jesus quotes f f\r out ( ! five books ( ,moses1 & f ! ,psalms1 ,isaiah1 ,mala*i1 & ,ze*>iah1 ) ! =mula1 8x is writt502 see ,mat4 #d3d1 #f1 #g2 #aa3aj2 ,m>k #ad3bg2 ,luke #d3d-ab4 ,?is =mula among ! ,jews indicat$ t ! quotation 0 f a sacr$ book & 0 div9ely inspir$4 ,jesus c]ta9ly reg>d$ ! ,old ,te/am5t ) z mu* rev]5ce z ! ,jews ( 8 day4 ,he decl>$ t 8"o jot or "o tittle %all 9 no wise pass away f ! law0 7,mat4 #e3ah74 ,he said t 8! scripture _c be brok50 7,john #aj3ce7 8! normative & judicial au?ority ( ! ,scripture _c be set aside2 notice "h 9 ! s+ul>1 ! idea ( ! unity ( ,scripture0 7,mey]74 ,& yet our ,"l's use ( ,o4 ,t4 ,scripture 0 :olly free f ! sup]/iti\s lit]alism :i* prevail$ among ! ,jews ( 8 day4 ,! phrases 8^w ( ,god0 7,john #aj3ce2 ,m>k #g3ac71 8wisdom ( ,god0 7,luke #aa3di7 & 8oracles ( ,god0 7,rom4 #c3b7 probably designate ! orig9al revelations ( ,god & n ! record ( ^! 9 ,scripture2 cf4 #a ,sam4 #i3bg2 #a ,*ron4 #ag3c2 ,is4 #dj3h2 ,mat4 #ac3ai2 ,luke #c3b2 ,acts #h3be4 ,jesus refuses ass5t to ! ,o4 ,t4 law respect+ ! ,sabba? 7,m>k #b3bg sq471 ext]nal defilem5ts 7,m>k #g3ae71 divorce 7,m>k #aj3b sq474 ,he 8came n to de/roy b to fulfil0 7,mat4 #e3ag72 yet he fulfill$ ! law by br++ out its inn] _s 9 8 p]fect life1 r ?an by =mal & m9ute ob$i5ce to its precepts2 see ,w5dt1 ,tea*+ ( ,jesus1 #b3e-ce4 ,! apo/les quote ! ,o4 ,t4 z ! utt]ance ( ,god 7,eph4 #d3h-- 1 sc4 74 ,paul's insi/5ce ^u ! =m ( ev5 a s+le ^w1 z 9 ,gal4 #c3af1 & 8 use ( ! ,o4 ,t4 = purposes ( allegory1 z 9 ,gal #d3ba-ca1 %[ t 9 8 view ! ,o4 ,t4 text 0 sacr$4 ,philo1 ,josephus & ! ,talmud1 9 _! int]pretations ( ! ,o4 ,t41 fall cont9ually into a 8n>r[ & unhappy lit]alism40 8,! ,n4 ,t4 does n inde$ escape ,rabb9ical me?ods1 b ev5 :]e ^! are mo/ prom95t !y seem to affect ! =m f> m ?an ! sub/ance4 ,& ?r\gh ! tempor>y & local =m ! writ] con/antly p5etrates to ! v he>t ( ! ,o4 ,t4 tea*+20 see ,s&ay1 ,bampton ,lectures on ,inspiration1 #hg2 ,h5d]son1 ,inspiration1 #bed4 #c4 ,jesus commission$ 8 apo/les z tea*]s & gave !m promises ( a sup]natural aid ( ! ,holy ,_s 9 _! tea*+1 l ! promises made to ! ,old ,te/am5t prophets4 ,mat4 #bh3ai1 #bj--8;,g ye 444 tea*+ 444 & lo1 ,i am ) y40 ,comp>e promises to ,moses 7,ex4 #c3ab71 ,j]emiah 7,j]4 #a3e-h71 ,ezekiel 7,ezek4 #b & #c74 ,see also ,is4 #dd3c & ,joel #b3bh--8;,i w p\r my ,_s ^u ?y se$02 ,mat4 #aj3g--8;z ye g1 prea*02 #ai--8;be n anxi\s h[ or :at ye %all speak02 ,john #ad3bf--8! ,holy ,_s 444 %all tea* y all ?+s02 #ae3bf1 #bg--8! ,_s ( tru? 444 %all be> witness ( me3 & ye also be> witness0 ! ,_s %all witness 9 & ?r\gh y2 #af3ac--8;he %all guide y into all ! tru?0 7#a7 limitation--all ! tru? ( ,*ri/1 i4 e41 n ( philosophy or sci5ce1 b ( religion2 7#b7 compreh5sion--all ! tru? )9 ?is limit$ range1 i4 e41 suffici5cy ( ,scripture z rule ( fai? & practice 7,hovey72 #ag3h--8! words :i* ?\ gave/ me ,i h giv5 unto !m02 ,acts #a3d--8;he *>g$ !m 444 to wait = ! promise ( ! ,fa!r02 ,john #bj3bb--8;he brea!d on !m1 & sai? unto !m1 ,receive ye ! ,holy ,_s40 ,"h 0 bo? promise & communication ( ! p]sonal ,holy ,_s4 ,comp>e ,mat4 #aj3ai1 #bj--8;x %all be giv5 y 9 t h\r :at ye %all speak4 ,= x is n ye t speak1 b ! ,_s ( y\r ,fa!r t speake? 9 y40 ,see ,h5d]son1 ,inspiration1 #bdg1 #bdh4 ,jesus' te/imony "h is ! te/imony ( ,god4 ,9 ,deut4 #ah3ah1 x is said t ,god w put 8 words into ! m\? ( ! great ,prophet4 ,9 ,john #ab3di1 #ej1 ,jesus says3 8,i spake n f myself1 b ! ,fa!r t s5t me1 he ha? giv5 me a comm&m5t1 :at ,i %\ld say1 & :at ,i %\ld speak4 ,& ,i "k t 8 comm&m5t is life et]nal2 ! ?+s !re=e :i* ,i speak1 ev5 z ! ,fa!r ha? said unto me1 s ,i speak40 ,john #ag3g1 #h--8;all ?+s :atsoev] ?\ ha/ giv5 me are f !e3 = ! words :i* ?\ gave/ me ,i h giv5 unto !m40 ,john #h3dj--8;a man t ha? told y ! tru?1 :i* ,i he>d f ,god40 #d4 ,! apo/les claim to h receiv$ ?is promis$ ,_s1 & "u 8 influ5ce to speak ) div9e au?ority1 putt+ _! writ+s ^u a level ) ! ,old ,te/am5t ,scriptures4 ,we h n only direct /atem5ts t bo? ! matt] & ! =m ( _! tea*+ 7 sup]vis$ by ! ,holy ,_s1 b we h indirect evid5ce t ?is 0 ! case 9 ! tone ( au?ority :i* p]vades _! addresses & epi/les4 ,/atem5ts3--#a ,cor4 #b3aj1 #ac--8unto u ,god reveal$ !m ?r\gh ! ,_s4444 ,:i* ?+s also we speak1 n 9 words :i* man's wisdom tea*e?1 b :i* ! ,_s tea*e?02 #aa3bc--8;,i receiv$ ( ! ,"l t :i* also ,i deliv]$ unto y02 #ab3h1 #bh--! 0 app>5tly a gift peculi> to ! apo/les2 #ad3cg1 #ch--8! ?+s :i* ,i write unto y 444 !y are ! comm&m5t ( ! ,"l02 ,gal4 #a3ab--8nei!r did ,i receive x f man1 nor 0 ,i taught x1 b x came to me ?r\gh revelation ( ,jesus ,*ri/02 #a ,!ss4 #d3b1 #h--8ye "k :at *>ge we gave y ?r\gh ! ,"l ,jesus4444 ,!re=e he t rejecte?1 rejecte? n man1 b ,god1 :o give? 8 ,holy ,_s unto y40 ,! foll[+ passages put ! tea*+ ( ! apo/les on ! same level ) ,o4 ,t4 ,scripture3 #a ,pet4 #a3aa1 #ab--8,_s ( ,*ri/ :i* 0 9 !m0 ,o4 ,t4 prophets2--,n4 ,t4 prea*]s 8prea*$ ! gospel unto y by ! ,holy ,_s02 #b ,pet4 #a3ba--,o4 ,t4 prophets 8spake f ,god1 be+ mov$ by ! ,holy ,_s02 #c3b--8rememb] ! words :i* 7 spok5 be=e by ! holy prophets0 ,o4 ,t41 8& ! comm&m5t ( ! ,"l & ,savior ?r\gh y\r apo/les0 ,n4 ,t42 #af--8wre/ ,paul's ,epi/les1 z !y d also ! o!r scriptures1 unto _! own de/ruction40 ,cf4 ,ex4 #d3ad-af2 #g3a4 ,implications3--#b ,tim4 #c3af--8;,e scripture inspir$ ( ,god is also pr(itable0--a cle> implication ( inspiration1 ?\gh n a direct /atem5t ( x !re is a div9ely inspir$ ,scripture4 ,9 #a ,cor4 #e3c-e1 ,paul1 comm&+ ! ,cor9?ian *ur* ) reg>d to ! ince/u\s p]son1 0 arrogant if n inspir$4 ,!re are m imp]atives 9 ! ,epi/les ?an 9 any o!r writ+s ( ! same ext5t4 ,notice ! cont9ual assev]ation ( au?ority1 z 9 ,gal4 #a3a1 #b1 & ! decl>ation t disbelief ( ! record is s91 z 9 #a ,john #e3aj1 #aa4 ,jude #c--8! fai? :i* 0 once = all 77 deliv]$ unto ! sa9ts40 ,see ,kahnis1 ,dogmatik1 #c3abb2 ,h5d]son1 ,inspiration 7#bnd ed471 #cd1 #bcd2 ,conant1 ,g5esis1 ,introd41 xiii1 note2 ,*>t]is1 ,new ,te/am5t ,scriptures3 ,!y claim tru?1 unity1 au?ority4 ,! passages quot$ above %[ t inspir$ m5 di/+ui%$ inspiration f _! own unaid$ ?9k+4 ,^! inspir$ m5 claim t _! inspiration is ! same ) t ( ! prophets4 ,rev4 #bb3f--8! ,"l1 ! ,god ( ! spirits ( ! prophets1 s5t 8 angel to %[ unto 8 s]vants ! ?+s :i* mu/ %ortly come to pass0 inspiration gave !m sup]natural k ( ! future4 ,z inspiration 9 ! ,o4 ,t4 0 ! "w ( ! pre-inc>nate ,*ri/1 s inspiration 9 ! ,n4 ,t4 is ! "w ( ! asc5d$ & glorifi$ ,*ri/ by 8 ,holy ,_s4 ,on ! ,relative ,au?ority ( ! ,gospels1 see ,g]h>dt1 9 ,am4 ,j\rn4 ,!ol41 ,apl4 #ahii3bge-bid1 :o %[s t n ! words ( ,jesus 9 ! gospels are ! f9al revelation1 b r ! tea*+ ( ! ris5 & glorifi$ ,*ri/ 9 ! ,acts & ! ,epi/les4 ,! ,epi/les are ! po/hum\s works ( ,*ri/4 ,pattison1 ,mak+ ( ! ,s]mon1 #bc--8,! apo/les1 believ+ !mselves to be inspir$ tea*]s1 (t5 prea*$ )\t texts2 & ! fact t _! successors did n foll[ _! example %[s t = !mselves !y made no su* claim4 ,inspiration ceas$1 & h5ce=? au?ority 0 f\nd 9 ! use ( ! words ( ! n[ complete ,scriptures40 #e4 ,! apo/olic writ]s ( ! ,new ,te/am5t1 unlike pr(ess$ly inspir$ hea!n sages & poets1 gave atte/ation by miracles or prophecy t !y 7 inspir$ by ,god1 & !re is reason to believe t ! productions ( ^? :o 7 n apo/les1 su* z ,m>k1 ,luke1 ,hebrews1 ,james1 & ,jude1 7 recomm5d$ to ! *ur*es z inspir$1 by apo/olic sanction & au?ority4 ,! twelve wr\ght miracles 7,mat4 #aj3a74 ,paul's 8signs ( an apo/le0 7#b ,cor4 #ac3ab7 miracles4 ,int]nal evid5ce confirms ! tradition t ,m>k 0 ! 8int]pret] ( ,pet]10 & t ,luke's gospel & ! ,acts _h ! sanction ( ,paul4 ,s9ce ! purpose ( ! ,_s's be/[m5t 0 to qualify ^? :o 7 to be ! tea*]s & f\nd]s ( ! new religion1 x is only fair to assume t ,*ri/'s promise ( ! ,_s 0 valid n simply to ! twelve b to all :o /ood 9 _! places1 & to ^! n simply z speak]s1 b1 s9ce 9 ?is respect !y _h a /ill great] ne$ ( div9e guidance1 to !m z writ]s also4 ,! epi/le to ! ,hebrews1 ) ! lett]s ( ,james & ,jude1 appe>$ 9 ! lifetime ( "s ( ! twelve1 & pass$ un*all5g$2 & ! fact t !y all1 ) ! possible exception ( #b ,pet]1 7 v e>ly accept$ by ! *ur*es f\nd$ & wat*$ ov] by ! apo/les1 is suffici5t evid5ce t ! apo/les reg>d$ !m z inspir$ productions4 ,z evid5ces t ! writ]s reg>d$ _! writ+s z ( univ]sal au?ority1 see #a ,cor4 #a3b--8unto ! *ur* ( ,god :i* is at ,cor9? 444 ) all t call ^u ! "n ( our ,"l ,jesus ,*ri/ 9 e place10 etc42 #g3ag--8s orda9 ,i 9 all ! *ur*es02 ,col4 #d3af--8;,& :5 ?is epi/le ha? be5 read among y1 cause t x be read also 9 ! *ur* ( ! ,laodiceans02 #b ,pet4 #c3ae1 #af--8our belov$ bro!r ,paul also1 accord+ to ! wisdom giv5 to him1 wrote unto y40 ,see ,b>tlett1 9 ,pr9ceton ,rev41 ,jan4 #ahhj3bc-eg2 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,jan4 #ahhd3bjd1 #bje4 ,johnson1 ,sy/ematic ,!ology1 #dj--8,miracul\s gifts 7 be/[$ at ,p5teco/ on _m besides apo/les4 ,prophecy 0 n an uncommon gift dur+ ! apo/olic p]iod40 ,!re is no antec$5t improbability t inspiration %\ld ext5d to o!rs ?an to ! pr9cipal lead]s ( ! *ur*1 & s9ce we h express in/ances ( su* inspiration 9 oral utt]ances 7,acts #aa3bh2 #ba3i1 #aj7 x seems natural t !re %\ld h be5 in/ances ( inspiration 9 writt5 utt]ances also4 ,9 "s cases ?is appe>s to h be5 only an inspiration ( sup]9t5d5ce4 ,clem5t ( ,alex&ria says only t ,pet] nei!r =bade nor enc\rag$ ,m>k 9 8 plan ( writ+ ! gospel4 ,ir5u tells u t ,m>k's gospel 0 writt5 aft] ! dea? ( ,pet]4 ,papias says t ,m>k wrote d[n :at he rememb]$ to h he>d f ,pet]4 ,luke does n seem to h be5 aw>e ( any miracul\s aid 9 8 writ+1 & 8 me?ods appe> to h be5 ^? ( ! ord9>y hi/orian4 #f4 ,! *ief pro( ( inspiration1 h[ev]1 mu/ always be f\nd 9 ! int]nal *>act]i/ics ( ! ,scriptures !mselves1 z ^! are disclos$ to ! s9c]e inquir] by ! ,holy ,_s4 ,! te/imony ( ! ,holy ,_s comb9es ) ! tea*+ ( ! ,bible to conv9ce ! e>ne/ read] t ?is tea*+ is z a :ole & 9 all ess5tials beyond ! p[] ( man to communicate1 & t x mu/ !re=e h be5 put into p]man5t & writt5 =m by special inspiration ( ,god4 ,fo/]1 ,*ri/ian ,life & ,!ology1 #aje--8,! te/imony ( ! ,_s is an argum5t f id5tity ( effects--! doctr9es ( exp]i5ce & ! doctr9es ( ! ,bible--to id5tity ( cause4444 ,god-wr\ght exp]i5ce proves a ,god-wr\ght ,bible4444 ,?is cov]s ! ,bible z a :ole1 if n ! :ole ( ! ,bible4 ,x is true s f> z ,i c te/ x4 ,x is to be believ$ /ill fur!r if !re is no o!r evid5ce40 ,lyman ,abbott1 9 8 ,!ology ( an ,evolutioni/1 #aje1 calls ! ,bible 8a record ( man's laboratory "w 9 ! spiritual realm1 a hi/ory ( ! dawn+ ( ! consci\sness ( ,god & ( ! div9e life 9 ! s\l ( man40 ,?is seems to u unduly subjective4 ,we pref] to say t ! ,bible is also ,god's witness to u ( 8 pres5ce & work+ 9 human he>ts & 9 human hi/ory--a witness :i* proves its div9e orig9 by awak5+ 9 u exp]i5ces simil> to ^? :i* x describes1 & :i* are beyond ! p[] ( man to orig9ate4 ,g4 ,p4 ,fi%]1 9 ,mag4 ( ,*ri/4 ,lit41 ,dec4 #ahib3bci--8;,is ! ,bible infallible8 ,n 9 ! s5se t all its /atem5ts ext5d+ ev5 to m9uti 9 matt]s ( hi/ory & sci5ce are /rictly accurate4 ,n 9 ! s5se t e doctr9al & e?ical /atem5t 9 all ^! books is incapable ( am5dm5t4 ,! :ole mu/ sit 9 judgm5t on ! p>ts4 ,revelation is progressive4 ,!re is a human factor z well z a div9e4 ,! treasure is 9 e>!n vessels4 ,b ! ,bible is infallible 9 ! s5se t :oev] surr5d]s himself 9 a docile _s to its tea*+ w fall into no hurtful error 9 matt]s ( fai? & *>ity4 ,be/ ( all1 he w f9d 9 x ! secret ( a new1 holy & bless$ life1 #8hidd5 ) ,*ri/ 9 ,god' 7,col4 #c3c74 ,! ,scriptures are ! witness to ,*ri/4444 ,?r\gh ! ,scriptures he is truly & adequately made kn[n to u40 ,d5ney1 ,dea? ( ,*ri/1 #cad--8,! unity ( ! ,bible & its inspiration are correlative t]ms4 ,if we c disc]n a real unity 9 x--& ,i believe we c :5 we see t x conv]ges ^u & culm9ates 9 a div9e love be>+ ! s9 ( ! _w--!n t unity & its inspiration are "o & ! same ?+4 ,& x is n only inspir$ z a :ole1 x is ! only book t is inspir$4 ,x is ! only book 9 ! _w to :i* ,god sets 8 seal 9 our he>ts :5 we read 9 se>* ( an answ] to ! "q1 ,h[ %all a s9ful man be righte\s ) ,god8444 ,! conclusion ( our /udy ( ,inspiration %\ld be ! conviction t ! ,bible gives u a body ( doctr9e--a #8fai? :i* 0 once = all deliv]$ unto ! sa9ts' 7,jude #c740 ,,iii4 ,!ories ( ,inspiration4 #a4 ,! ,intuition-!ory4 ,?is holds t inspiration is b a high] developm5t ( t natural insight into tru? :i* all m5 possess to "s degree2 a mode ( intellig5ce 9 matt]s ( morals & religion :i* gives rise to sacr$ books1 z a correspond+ mode ( intellig5ce 9 matt]s ( secul> tru? gives rise to great works ( philosophy or art4 ,?is mode ( intellig5ce is reg>d$ z ! product ( man's own p[]s1 ei!r )\t special div9e influ5ce or ) only ! inwork+ ( an imp]sonal ,god4 ,?is !ory naturally connects itself ) ,pelagian & rationali/ic views ( man's indep5d5ce ( ,god1 or ) pan!i/ic conceptions ( man z be+ himself ! highe/ manife/ation ( an all-p]vad+ b unconsci\s intellig5ce4 ,morell & ,f4 ,w4 ,newman 9 ,engl&1 & ,!odore ,p>k] 9 ,am]ica1 are repres5tatives ( ?is !ory4 ,see ,morell1 ,philos4 ( ,religion1 #abg-agi--8;,inspiration is only a high] pot5cy ( :at e man possesses 9 "s degree40 ,see also ,francis ,w4 ,newman 7bro!r ( ,john ,h5ry ,newman71 ,phases ( ,fai? 7 phases ( unbelief72 ,!odore ,p>k]1 ,disc\rses ( ,religion1 & ,exp]i5ces z a ,m9i/]3 8,god is inf9ite2 !re=e he is imman5t 9 nature1 yet transc5d+ x2 imman5t 9 _s1 yet transc5d+ t4 ,he mu/ fill ea* po9t ( _s1 z ( space2 matt] mu/ unconsci\sly obey2 man1 consci\s & free1 has p[] to a c]ta9 ext5t to disobey1 b obey+1 ! imman5t ,god acts 9 man z mu* z 9 nature0--quot$ 9 ,*adwick1 ,!odore ,p>k]1 #bga4 ,h5ce ,p>k]'s view ( ,inspiration3 ,if ! conditions are fulfill$1 inspiration comes 9 proportion to man's gifts & to 8 use ( ^? gifts4 ,*adwick himself1 9 8 ,old & ,new ,unit>ianism1 #fh1 says t 8! ,scriptures are inspir$ j s f> z !y are inspir+1 & no m40 ,w4 ,c4 ,gannett1 ,life ( ,ezra ,/iles ,gannett1 #aif--8,p>k]'s spiritualism affirm$1 z ! gr& tru? ( religion1 ! imman5ce ( an inf9itely p]fect ,god 9 matt] & m9d1 & 8 activity 9 bo? sph]es40 ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy ( ,religion1 #b3agh-ahj--8,!odore ,p>k] treats ! regul> results ( ! human faculties z an imm$iate work+ ( ,god1 & reg>ds ! ,pr9cipia ( ,newton z inspir$4444 ,:at !n becomes ( ! human p]sonality8 ,he calls ,god n only omnipres5t1 b omniactive4 ,is !n ,%akespe>e only by c\rtesy au?or ( ,macbe?8444 ,if ?is 7 m ?an rhetorical1 x w\ld be unconditional pan!ism40 ,bo? nature & man are o!r names = ,god4 ,m>t9eau is will+ to grant t our intuitions & ideals are expressions ( ! ,deity 9 u1 b our p]sonal reason+ & /riv+1 he ?9ks1 _c be attribut$ to ,god4 ,! ^w has no plural3 intellect1 9 :atev] subject manife/$1 be+ all "o1 j z a tru? is "o & ! same1 9 h[ev] _m p]sons' consci\sness x may pres5t itself2 see ,m>t9eau1 ,seat ( ,au?ority1 #djc4 ,palm]1 ,/udies 9 ,!ological ,def9ition1 #bg--8,we c draw no %>p di/9ction betwe5 ! human m9d discov]+ tru?1 & ! div9e m9d imp>t+ revelation40 ,ku55 belongs to ?is s*ool4 ,) reg>d to ?is !ory we rem>k3 7a7 ,man has1 inde$1 a c]ta9 natural insight into tru?1 & we grant t inspiration uses ?is1 s f> z x w g1 & makes x an in/rum5t 9 discov]+ & record+ facts ( nature or hi/ory4 ,9 ! inve/igation1 = example1 ( purely hi/orical matt]s1 su* z ,luke records1 m]ely natural insight may at times h be5 suffici5t4 ,:5 ?is 0 ! case1 ,luke may h be5 left to ! ex]cise ( 8 own faculties1 inspiration only incit+ & sup]vis+ ! "w4 ,george ,h>ris1 ,moral ,evolution1 #dac--8;,god c\ld n reveal himself to man1 unless he fir/ reveal$ himself 9 man4 ,if x %\ld be writt5 9 lett]s on ! sky3 #8,god is good1'--! words w\ld h no mean+1 unless goodness _h be5 made kn[n already 9 human volitions4 ,revelation is n by an occasional /roke1 b by a cont9u\s process4 ,x is n sup]impos$1 b inh]5t4444 ,g5ius is inspir$2 = ! m9d :i* p]ceives tru? mu/ be responsive to ! ,m9d t made ?+s ! vehicles ( ?\ght40 ,s&ay1 ,bampton ,lectures on ,inspiration3 8,9 claim+ = ! ,bible inspiration1 we d n exclude ! possibility ( o!r l[] or m p>tial degrees ( inspiration 9 o!r lit]atures4 ,! ,_s ( ,god has d\btless t\*$ o!r he>ts & o!r m9ds 444 9 su* a way z to give insight into tru?1 besides ^? :i* c\ld claim desc5t f ,abraham40 ,philo ?\ght ! ,,lxx translators1 ! ,greek philosoph]s1 & at times ev5 himself1 to be inspir$4 ,plato he reg>ds z 8mo/ sacr$0 771 b all good m5 are 9 v>i\s degrees inspir$4 ,yet ,philo nev] quotes z au?oritative any b ! ,canonical ,books4 ,he attributes to !m an au?ority unique 9 its k9d4 7b7 ,9 all matt]s ( morals & religion1 h[ev]1 man's insight into tru? is vitiat$ by wrong affections1 &1 unless a sup]natural wisdom c guide him1 he is c]ta9 to err himself1 & to lead o!rs into error4 #a ,cor4 #b3ad--8,n[ ! natural man receive? n ! ?+s ( ! ,_s ( ,god3 = !y are fooli%ness unto him2 & he _c "k !m1 because !y are spiritually judg$02 #aj--8;,b unto u ,god reveal$ !m ?r\gh ! ,_s3 = ! ,_s se>*e? all ?+s1 yea1 ! deep ?+s ( ,god40 ,see quotation f ,col]idge1 9 ,%airp1 ,culture & ,religion1 #aad--8,wat] _c rise high] ?an its s\rce2 nei!r c human reason+02 ,em]son1 ,prose ,works1 #a3dgd2 #b3dfh--8',tis curi\s we only believe z deep z we live02 ,ullmann1 ,s9lessness ( ,jesus1 #ahc1 #ahd4 ,= ?is reason we hold to a communication ( religi\s tru?1 at lea/ at times1 m direct & objective ?an is grant$ by ,george ,adam ,smi?1 ,com4 on ,isaiah1 #a3cgb--8,to ,isaiah inspiration 0 no?+ m nor less ?an ! possession ( c]ta9 /rong moral & religi\s convictions1 :i* he felt he ow$ to ! communication ( ! ,_s ( ,god1 & accord+ to :i* he int]pret$1 & ev5 d>$ to =etell1 ! hi/ory ( 8 p & ( ! _w4 ,our /udy completely dispels1 on ! evid5ce ( ! ,bible itself1 t view ( inspiration & pr$iction s long held 9 ! *ur*40 ,if ?is is meant z a d5ial ( any communication ( tru? o!r ?an ! int]nal & subjective1 we set ov] aga9/ x4 ,num4 #ab3f-h--8;if !re be a prophet among y1 ,i ! ,"l w make myself kn[n unto him 9 a vision1 ,i w speak ) him 9 a dream4 ,my s]vant ,moses is n s2 he is fai?ful 9 all my h\se3 ) him w ,i speak m\? to m\?1 ev5 manife/ly1 & n 9 d>k spee*es2 & ! =m ( ,jehovah %all he behold40 7c7 ,! !ory 9 "q1 hold+ z x does t natural insight is ! only s\rce ( religi\s tru?1 involves a self-contradiction2--if ! !ory be true1 !n "o man is inspir$ to utt] :at a second is inspir$ to pron\nce false4 ,! ,v$as1 ! ,koran & ! ,bible _c be inspir$ to contradict ea* o!r4 ,! ,v$as p]mit ?iev+1 & ! ,koran tea*es salvation by works2 ^! _c be inspir$ & ! ,bible also4 ,paul _c be inspir$ to write 8 epi/les1 & ,sw$5borg also inspir$ to reject !m4 ,! ,bible does n admit t pagan tea*+s h ! same div9e endorsem5t ) its own4 ,among ! ,sp>tans to /eal 0 praisewor?y2 only to be caught /eal+ 0 crim9al4 ,on ! religi\s consci\sness ) reg>d to ! p]sonality ( ,god1 ! div9e goodness1 ! future life1 ! utility ( pray]1 9 all ( :i* ,miss ,cobbe1 ,mr4 ,greg & ,mr4 ,p>k] disagree ) ea* o!r1 see ,bruce1 ,apologetics1 #adc1 #add4 ,) ,ma!son we may grant t ! lead+ idea ( inspiration is 8! gr[? ( ! div9e ?r\gh ! capacities ( ! human10 :ile yet we d5y t inspiration conf9es itself to ?is subjective enlight5m5t ( ! human faculties1 & also we exclude f ! div9e work+ all ^? p]v]se & errone\s utt]ances :i* are ! results ( human s94 7d7 ,x makes moral & religi\s tru? to be a purely subjective ?+--a matt] ( private op9ion--hav+ no objective reality indep5d5tly ( m5's op9ions reg>d+ x4 ,on ?is sy/em tru? is :at m5 8tr[02 ?+s are :at m5 8?9k0--words repres5t+ only ! subjective4 8,bett] ! ,greek #8! unconceal$' 7objective tru?70--,h>ris1 ,philos4 ,basis ( ,!ism1 #ahb4 ,if !re be no absolute tru?1 ,less+'s 8se>* = tru?0 is ! only ?+ left to u4 ,b :o w se>*1 if !re is no tru? to be f\nd8 ,ev5 a wise cat w n et]nally *ase its own tail4 ,! ex]cise )9 c]ta9 limits is d\btless useful1 b ! cat gives x up s soon z x becomes conv9c$ t ! tail _c be caught4 ,sir ,ri*>d ,burton became a ,roman ,ca?olic1 a ,brahm91 & a ,mohamm$an1 successively1 app>5tly hold+ ) ,hamlet t 8!re is no?+ ei!r good or bad1 b ?9k+ makes x s40 ,?is same scepticism z to ! exi/5ce ( objective tru? appe>s 9 ! say+s3 8,y\r religion is good = y1 & m9e = me02 8,"o man is born an ,augu/9ian1 & ano!r a ,pelagian40 ,see ,dix1 ,pan!ism1 ,introd41 #ab4 ,ri*t]3 8,x is n ! goal1 b ! c\rse1 t makes u happy40 7e7 ,x logically involves ! d5ial ( a p]sonal ,god :o is tru? & reveals tru?1 & s makes man to be ! highe/ intellig5ce 9 ! univ]se4 ,?is is to expla9 inspiration by d5y+ its exi/5ce2 s9ce1 if !re be no p]sonal ,god1 inspiration is b a figure ( spee* = a purely natural fact4 ,! animus ( ?is !ory is d5ial ( ! sup]natural4 ,l ! d5ial ( miracles1 x c be ma9ta9$ only ^u gr\nds ( a!ism or pan!ism4 ,! view 9 "q1 z ,hutton 9 8 ,essays rem>ks1 w\ld p]mit u to say t ! ^w ( ! ,"l came to ,gibbon1 amid ! ru9s ( ! ,coliseum1 say+3 8,g1 write ! hi/ory ( ! ,decl9e & ,fall60 ,b1 replies ,hutton3 ,su* a view is pan!i/ic4 ,inspiration is ! voice ( a liv+ fri5d1 9 di/9ction f ! voice ( a dead fri5d1 i4 e41 ! influ5ce ( 8 memory4 ,! inw>d impulse ( g5ius1 ,%akespe>e's = example1 is n prop]ly d5om9at$ inspiration4 ,see ,r[1 ,bampton ,lectures = #ahgg3dbh-dgd2 ,rog]s1 ,eclipse ( ,fai?1 #gc sq4 & #bhc sq42 ,h5d]son1 ,inspiration 7#bnd ed471 #ddc-dfi1 #dha-dij4 ,! view ( ,m>t9eau1 ,seat ( ,au?ority1 #cjb1 is sub/antially ?is4 ,see criticism ( ,m>t9eau1 by ,ra9y1 9 ,critical ,rev41 #a3e-bj4 #b4 ,! ,illum9ation ,!ory4 ,?is reg>ds inspiration z m]ely an int5sify+ & elevat+ ( ! religi\s p]ceptions ( ! ,*ri/ian1 ! same 9 k9d1 ?\gh great] 9 degree1 ) ! illum9ation ( e believ] by ! ,holy ,_s4 ,x holds1 n t ! ,bible is1 b t x conta9s1 ! ^w ( ,god1 & t n ! writ+s1 b only ! writ]s1 7 inspir$4 ,! illum9ation giv5 by ! ,holy ,_s1 h[ev]1 puts ! inspir$ writ] only 9 full possession ( 8 normal p[]s1 b does n communicate objective tru? beyond 8 ability to discov] or und]/&4 ,?is !ory naturally connects itself ) ,arm9ian views ( m]e cop]ation ) ,god4 ,x diff]s f ! ,intuition-!ory by conta9+ sev]al di/9ctively ,*ri/ian elem5ts3 7#a7 ! influ5ce ( a p]sonal ,god2 7#b7 an extraord9>y "w ( ! ,holy ,_s2 7#c7 ! ,*ri/ological "* ( ! ,scriptures1 putt+ into =m a revelation ( :i* ,*ri/ is ! c5tre 7,rev4 #ai3aj74 ,b :ile x grants t ! ,scripture writ]s 7 8mov$ by ! ,holy ,_s0 7--#b ,pet4 #a3ba71 x ignores ! complem5t>y fact t ! ,scripture itself is 8inspir$ ( ,god0 7--#b ,tim4 #c3af74 ,lu!r's view resembles ?is2 see ,dorn]1 ,ges*4 prot4 ,!ol41 #bcf1 #bcg4 ,s*lei]ma*]1 ) ! m or?odox ,ne&]1 ,?oluck & ,crem]1 holds x2 see ,essays by ,?oluck1 9 ,h]zog1 ,encyclopdie1 & 9 ,noyes1 ,!ological ,essays2 ,crem]1 ,lexicon ,n4,t41 1 & 9 ,h]zog & ,hauck1 ,real5cyc41 #i3ahc-bjc4 ,9 ,france1 ,sabati]1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #ij1 rem>ks3 8,prophetic inspiration is piety rais$ to ! second p[]0--x diff]s f ! piety ( common m5 only 9 int5sity & en]gy4 ,see also ,godet1 9 ,revue ,*rti5ne1 ,jan4 #ahgh4 ,9 ,engl& ,col]idge prop\nd$ ?is view 9 8 ,confessions ( an ,inquir+ ,_s 7,works1 #e3ffi7--8,:atev] f9ds me be>s witness t x has proce$$ f a ,holy ,_s2 9 ! ,bible !re is m t f9ds me ?an ,i h exp]i5c$ 9 all o!r books put toge!r40 ,%all we !n call ,baxt]'s 8,sa9ts' ,re/0 inspir$1 :ile ! ,books ( ,*ronicles are n8 ,see also ,f4 ,w4 ,rob]tson1 ,s]mon ,i2 ,life & ,lett]s1 lett] #ec1 vol4 #a3bgj2 #b3adc-aej--8,! o!r way1 "s tw5ty or ?irty m5 9 ! _w's hi/ory h _h special communication1 miracul\s & f ,god2 9 ?is way1 all may h x1 & by dev\t & e>ne/ cultivation ( ! m9d & he>t may h x illimitably increas$40 ,fr$]ick ,w4 ,h4 ,my]s1 ,ca?olic ,?\ghts on ! ,bible & ,!ology1 #aj-bj1 emphasizes ! idea t ! ,scriptures are1 9 _! e>li] p>ts1 n m]ely inadequate1 b p>tially untrue1 & subsequ5tly sup]s$$ by full] revelations4 ,! lead+ ?\ght is t ( accommodation2 ! record ( revelation is n necess>ily infallible4 ,all51 ,religi\s ,progress1 #dd1 quotes ,bi%op ,?irlwall3 8,if t ,_s by :i* e man spoke ( old is a liv+ & pres5t ,_s1 its lat] lessons may well transc5d its e>li]02--,pascal's 8colossal man0 is ! race2 ! fir/ m5 repres5t$ only infancy2 we are 8! anci5ts01 & we are wis] ?an our fa!rs4 ,see also ,f>r>1 ,critical ,hi/ory ( ,free ,?\ght1 #dgc1 note #ej2 ,m>t9eau1 ,/udies 9 ,*ri/ianity3 8,"o ,gospel 9 ,_m ,dialects40 ,( ,am]ican writ]s :o favor ?is view1 see ,j4 ,f4 ,cl>ke1 ,or?odoxy1 its ,tru?s & ,errors1 #gd2 ,curtis1 ,human ,elem5t 9 ,inspiration2 ,:iton1 9 ,n4 ,eng41 ,jan4 #ahhb3fc-gb2 ,ladd1 9 ,&ov] ,review1 ,july1 #ahhe1 9 ,:at is ! ,bible8 & 9 ,doctr9e ( ,sacr$ ,scripture1 #a3gei--8;a l>ge proportion ( its writ+s inspir$02 #b3agh1 #bge1 #dig--8t fundam5tal misconception :i* id5tifies ! ,bible & ! ^w ( ,god02 #b3dhh--8;,inspiration1 z ! subjective condition ( ,biblical revelation & ! pr$icate ( ! ^w ( ,god1 is specifically ! same illum9+1 quick5+1 elevat+ & purify+ "w ( ! ,holy ,_s z t :i* goes on 9 ! p]sons ( ! entire believ+ community40 ,pr(essor ,ladd !re=e p>es d[n all pr$ictive prophecy1 & reg>ds ,isaiah #ec1 n z directly & solely1 b only z typically1 ,messianic4 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #ce-dd--8;,inspiration is exaltation1 quick5+ ( ability1 /imulation ( spiritual p[]2 x is uplift+ & enl>gem5t ( capacity = p]ception1 compreh5sion & utt]ance2 & all "u ! influ5ce ( a ?\ght1 a tru?1 or an ideal t has tak5 possession ( ! s\l4444 ,inspiration to write 0 n diff]5t 9 k9d f ! common influ5ce ( ,god ^u 8 p4444 ,inequality 9 ! ,scriptures is pla94444 ,ev5 if we 7 conv9c$ t "s book w\ld bett] h be5 omitt$ f ! ,canon1 our confid5ce 9 ! ,scriptures w\ld n !reby be %ak54 ,! ,canon did n make ,scripture1 b ,scripture made ! ,canon4 ,! inspiration ( ! ,bible does n prove its excell5ce1 b its excell5ce proves its inspiration4 ,! ,_s br\ght ! ,scriptures to help ,*ri/'s "w1 b n to take 8 place4 ,scripture says ) ,paul3 #8,n t we h lord%ip ov] y\r fai?1 b are help]s ( y\r joy3 = 9 fai? ye /& fa/' 7#b ,cor4 #a3bd740 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,! (fice ( ! ,_s 9 inspiration is n diff]5t f t :i* he p]=m$ = ,*ri/ians at ! "t ! gospels 7 writt54444 ,:5 ! prophets say3 #8,?us sai? ! ,"l1' !y mean simply t !y h div9e au?ority = :at !y utt]40 ,calv9 ,e4 ,/[e1 ,hi/ory ( ,books ( ,bible1 #ai--8;,x is n ! words ( ! ,bible t 7 inspir$4 ,x is n ! ?\ghts ( ! ,bible t 7 inspir$4 ,x 0 ! m5 :o wrote ! ,bible :o 7 inspir$40 ,?ay]1 ,*ang$ ,attitude t[>d ! ,bible1 #fc--8;,x 0 n be=e ! polemic _s became rife 9 ! controv]sies :i* foll[$ ! ,re=mation t ! fundam5tal di/9ction betwe5 ! ^w ( ,god & ! record ( t ^w became oblit]at$1 & ! pe/il5t t5et ga9$ curr5cy t ! ,bible is absolutely free f e error ( e sort40 ,pr9cipal ,cave1 9 ,homiletical ,review1 ,feb4 #ahib1 admitt+ errors b none s]i\s 9 ! ,bible1 proposes a m$iat+ /atem5t = ! pres5t controv]sy1 namely1 t ,revelation implies in]rancy1 b t ,inspiration does n4 ,:atev] ,god reveals mu/ be true1 b _m h become inspir$ )\t be+ r5d]$ infallible4 ,see also ,mead1 ,sup]natural ,revelation1 #bia sq4 ,) reg>d to ?is !ory we rem>k3 7a7 ,!re is unque/ionably an illum9ation ( ! m9d ( e believ] by ! ,holy ,_s1 & we grant t !re may h be5 in/ances 9 :i* ! influ5ce ( ! ,_s1 9 inspiration1 am\nt$ only to illum9ation4 ,c]ta9 applications & int]pretations ( ,old ,te/am5t ,scripture1 z = example1 ,john ! ,bapti/'s application to ,jesus ( ,isaiah's prophecy 7,john #a3bi--8;,behold1 ! ,lamb ( ,god1 t take? away m>g4 8be>e?0 ! s9 ( ! _w071 & ,pet]'s int]pretation ( ,david's words 7,acts #b3bg--8?\ wilt n leave my s\l unto ,hades1 ,nei!r wilt ?\ give ?y ,holy ,"o to see corruption071 may h requir$ only ! illum9at+ influ5ce ( ! ,holy ,_s4 ,!re is a s5se 9 :i* we may say t ! ,scriptures are inspir$ only to ^? :o are !mselves inspir$4 ,! ,holy ,_s mu/ %[ u ,*ri/ be=e we recognize ! "w ( ! ,_s 9 ,scripture4 ,! doctr9es ( atonem5t & ( ju/ification p]haps did n ne$ to be newly reveal$ to ! ,n4 ,t4 writ]s2 illum9ation z to e>li] revelations may h suffic$4 ,b t ,*ri/ exi/$ be=e 8 inc>nation1 & t !re are p]sonal di/9ctions 9 ! ,godhead1 probably requir$ revelation4 ,edison says t 8inspiration is simply p]spiration40 ,g5ius has be5 def9$ z 8unlimit$ p[] to take pa9s40 ,b x is m--! p[] to d spontane\sly & )\t ef=t :at ! ord9>y man does by ! h>de/4 ,e great g5ius recognizes t ?is p[] is due to ! infl[+ into him ( a ,_s great] ?an 8 own--! ,_s ( div9e wisdom & en]gy4 ,! ,scripture writ]s attribute _! und]/&+ ( div9e ?+s to ! ,holy ,_s2 see next p>agraph4 ,on g5ius1 z due to 8sublim9al upru%10 see ,f4 ,w4 ,h4 ,my]s1 ,human ,p]sonality1 #a3gj-abj4 7b7 ,b we d5y t ?is 0 ! con/ant me?od ( inspiration1 or t su* an influ5ce c acc\nt = ! revelation ( new tru? to ! prophets & apo/les4 ,! illum9ation ( ! ,holy ,_s gives no new tru?1 b only a vivid appreh5sion ( ! tru? already reveal$4 ,any orig9al communication ( tru? mu/ h requir$ a "w ( ! ,_s diff]5t1 n 9 degree1 b 9 k9d4 ,! ,scriptures cle>ly di/+ui% betwe5 revelation1 or ! communication ( new tru?1 & illum9ation1 or ! quick5+ ( man's cognitive p[]s to p]ceive tru? already reveal$4 ,no increase 9 ! p[] ( ! eye or ! telescope w d m ?an to br+ into cle> view :at is already )9 its range4 ,illum9ation w n lift ! veil t hides :at is beyond4 ,revelation1 on ! o!r h&1 is an 8unveil+0--! rais+ ( a curta91 or ! br++ )9 our range ( :at 0 hidd5 be=e4 ,su* a special op]ation ( ,god is describ$ 9 #b ,sam4 #bc3b1 #c--8,! ,_s ( ,jehovah spake by me1 ,& 8 ^w 0 ^u my tongue4 ,! ,god ( ,israel said1 ,! ,rock ( ,israel spake to me02 ,mat4 #aj3bj--8;,= x is n ye t speak1 b ! ,_s ( y\r ,fa!r t speake? 9 y02 #a ,cor4 #b3i-ac--8,?+s :i* eye saw n1 & e> he>d n1 ,& :i* ent]$ n into ! he>t ( man1 ,:atsoev] ?+s ,god prep>$ = !m t love him4 ,b unto u ,god reveal$ !m ?r\gh ! ,_s3 = ! ,_s se>*e? all ?+s1 yea1 ! deep ?+s ( ,god4 ,= :o among m5 kn[e? ! ?+s ( a man1 save ! _s ( ! man1 :i* is 9 him8 ev5 s ! ?+s ( ,god none kn[e?1 save ! ,_s ( ,god4 ,b we receiv$1 n ! _s ( ! _w1 b ! _s :i* is f ,god2 t we might "k ! ?+s t 7 freely giv5 to u ( ,god40 ,clairvoyance & second sight1 ( :i* along ) _m cases ( imposition & exagg]ation !re seems to be a small residuum ( prov$ fact1 %[ t !re may be extraord9>y op]ations ( our natural p[]s4 ,b1 z 9 ! case ( miracle1 ! inspiration ( ,scripture necessitat$ an exaltation ( ^! natural p[]s su* z only ! special influ5ce ( ! ,holy ,_s c expla94 ,t ! product is inexplicable z due to m]e illum9ation seems pla9 :5 we rememb] t revelation sometimes exclud$ illum9ation z to ! mean+ ( t :i* 0 communicat$1 = ! prophets are repres5t$ 9 #a ,pet4 #a3aa z 8se>*+ :at "t or :at mann] ( "t ! ,_s ( ,*ri/ :i* 0 9 !m did po9t unto1 :5 x te/ifi$ be=eh& ! suff]+s ( ,*ri/1 & ! glories t %\ld foll[ !m40 ,s9ce no degree ( illum9ation c acc\nt = ! pr$iction ( 8?+s t are to come0 7,john #af3ac71 ?is !ory t5ds to ! d5ial ( any imm$iate revelation 9 prophecy s-call$1 & ! d5ial easily ext5ds to any imm$iate revelation ( doctr9e4 7c7 ,m]e illum9ation c\ld n secure ! ,scripture writ]s f frequ5t & griev\s error4 ,! spiritual p]ception ( ! ,*ri/ian is always r5d]$ to "s ext5t imp]fect & deceptive by rema9+ depravity4 ,! subjective elem5t s pr$om9ates 9 ?is !ory1 t no c]ta9ty rema9s ev5 ) reg>d to ! tru/wor?9ess ( ! ,scriptures z a :ole4 ,:ile we admit imp]fections ( detail 9 matt]s n ess5tial to ! moral & religi\s tea*+ ( ,scripture1 we claim t ! ,bible furni%es a suffici5t guide to ,*ri/ & to salvation4 ,! !ory we are consid]+1 h[ev]1 by mak+ ! measure ( hol9ess to be ! measure ( inspiration1 r5d]s ev5 ! collective te/imony ( ! ,scripture writ]s an unc]ta9 guide to tru?4 ,we po9t out !re=e t inspiration is n absolutely limit$ by ! moral condition ( ^? :o are inspir$4 ,k1 9 ! ,*ri/ian1 may g beyond conduct4 ,balaam & ,caiaphas 7 n holy m51 yet !y 7 inspir$ 7,num4 #bc3e2 ,john #aa3di-eb74 ,! promise ( ,*ri/ assur$ at lea/ ! ess5tial tru/wor?9ess ( 8 witnesses 7,mat4 #aj3g1 #ai1 #bj2 ,john #ad3bf2 #ae3bf1 #bg2 #af3ac2 #ag3h74 ,?is !ory t inspiration is a :olly subjective communication ( tru? leads to ! practical rejection ( important p>ts ( ,scripture1 9 fact to ! rejection ( all ,scripture t pr(esses to convey tru? beyond ! p[] ( man to discov] or to und]/&4 ,notice ! progress f ,?omas ,arnold 7,s]mons1 #b3ahe7 to ,mat!w ,arnold 7,lit]ature & ,dogma1 #acd1 #acg74 ,notice also ,sw$5borg's rejection ( ne>ly "o half ! ,bible 7,ru?1 ,*ronicles1 ,ezra1 ,nehemiah1 ,e/h]1 ,job1 ,prov]bs1 ,ecclesia/es1 ,song ( ,solomon1 & ! :ole ( ! ,n4 ,t4 except ! ,gospels & ! ,apocalypse71 connect$ ) ! claim ( div9e au?ority = 8 new revelation4 8,8 int]locutors all ,sw$5borgize0 7,r4 ,w4 ,em]son74 ,on ,sw$5borg1 see ,h\rs ) ! ,my/ics1 #b3bcj2 ,moehl]1 ,symbolism1 #dcf-dff2 ,new ,engl&]1 ,jan4 #ahgd3aie2 ,bapti/ ,review1 #ahhc3adc-aeg2 ,pond1 ,sw$5borgianism2 ,irel&1 ,! ,blot on ! ,bra91 #a-abi4 7d7 ,! !ory is logically indef5sible1 z intimat+ t illum9ation ) reg>d to tru? c be imp>t$ )\t imp>t+ tru? itself1 :]eas ,god mu/ fir/ furni% objective tru? to be p]ceiv$ be=e he c illum9ate ! m9d to p]ceive ! mean+ ( t tru?4 ,! !ory is analog\s to ! views t pres]vation is a cont9u$ creation2 k is recognition2 reg5]ation is increase ( light4 ,9 ord] to pres]vation1 some?+ mu/ fir/ be creat$ :i* c be pres]v$2 9 ord] to recognition1 some?+ mu/ be kn[n :i* c be recogniz$ or kn[n aga92 9 ord] to make increase ( light ( any use1 !re mu/ fir/ be ! p[] to see4 ,9 l mann]1 inspiration _c be m]e illum9ation1 because ! ext]nal necess>ily prec$es ! int]nal1 ! objective prec$es ! subjective1 ! tru? reveal$ prec$es ! appreh5sion ( t tru?4 ,9 ! case ( all tru? t surpasses ! normal p[]s ( man to p]ceive or evolve1 !re mu/ be special communication f ,god2 revelation mu/ g be=e inspiration2 inspiration alone is n revelation4 ,x matt]s n :e!r ?is communication ( tru? be f )\t or f )94 ,z 9 creation1 ,god c "w f )91 yet ! new result is n explicable z m]e reproduction ( ! pa/4 ,! eye c see only z x receives & uses ! ext]nal light furni%$ by ! sun1 ev5 ?\gh x be equally true t )\t ! eye ! light ( ! sun w\ld be no?+ wor?4 ,pfleid]]1 ,grundriss1 #ag-ai1 says t to ,s*lei]ma*] revelation is ! orig9al appe>ance ( a prop] religi\s life1 :i* life is d]iv$ nei!r f ext]nal communication nor f inv5tion & reflection1 b f a div9e imp>tation1 :i* imp>tation c be reg>d$1 n m]ely z an in/ructive influ5ce ^u man z an intellectual be+1 b z an end[m5t det]m9+ 8 :ole p]sonal exi/5ce--an end[m5t analog\s to ! high] conditions ( poetic & h]oic exaltation4 ,pfleid]] himself w\ld give ! "n 8revelation0 to 8e orig9al exp]i5ce 9 :i* man becomes aw>e (1 & is seiz$ by1 sup]s5sible tru?1 tru? :i* does n come f ext]nal imp>tation nor f purpos$ reflection1 b f ! unconsci\s & undivid$ transc5d5tal gr\nd ( ! s\l1 & s is receiv$ z an imp>tation f ,god ?r\gh ! m$ium ( ! s\l's human activity40 ,kaftan1 ,dogmatik1 #ea sq4--8,we mu/ put ! conception ( revelation 9 place ( inspiration4 ,scripture is ! record ( div9e revelation4 ,we d n propose a new doctr9e or inspiration1 9 place ( ! old4 ,we ne$ only revelation1 &1 "h & !re1 provid5ce4 ,! te/imony ( ! ,holy ,_s is giv51 n to inspiration1 b to revelation--! tru?s t t\* ! human _s & h be5 hi/orically reveal$40 ,all51 ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 #ahb--;,edw>ds held t spiritual life 9 ! s\l is giv5 by ,god only to 8 favorites & de> *ildr51 :ile inspiration may be ?r[n out1 z x 71 to dogs & sw9e--a ,balaam1 ,saul1 & ,judas4 ,! greate/ privilege ( apo/les & prophets 01 n _! inspiration1 b _! hol9ess4 ,bett] to h grace 9 ! he>t1 ?an to be ! "m ( ,*ri/ 7,luke #aa3bg1 #bh74 ,maltbie ,d4 ,babcock1 9 ,s4 ,s4 ,times1 #aija3eij--8,! man :o m\rns because infallibility _c be _h 9 a *ur*1 or a guide1 or a set ( /&>ds1 does n "k :5 he is well (f4 ,h[ c\ld ,god develop our m9ds1 our p[] ( moral judgm5t1 if !re 7 no #8_s to be tri$' 7#a ,john #d3a71 no necessity = discrim9ation1 no discipl9e ( se>* & *all5ge & *oice8 ,to give ! "r answ] to a problem is to put him on ! side ( infallibility s f> z t answ] is conc]n$1 b x is to d him an ineffable wrong t\*+ 8 real education4 ,! bless+ ( life's s*ool+ is n 9 kn[+ ! "r answ] 9 advance1 b 9 develop+ p[] ?r\gh /ruggle40 ,:y did ,john ,h5ry ,newman surr5d] to ! ,*ur* ( ,rome8 ,because he assum$ t an ext]nal au?ority is absolutely ess5tial to religion1 &1 :5 su* an assumption is foll[$1 ,rome is ! only logical t]m9us4 8,dogma 010 he says1 8! fundam5tal pr9ciple ( my religion40 ,mod]n ritualism is a return to ?is m$ival notion4 8,dogmatic ,*ri/ianity10 says ,h>nack1 8is ,ca?olic4 ,x ne$s an in]rant ,bible1 & an infallible *ur* to int]pret t ,bible4 ,! dogmatic ,prote/ant is ( ! same camp ) ! sacram5tal & infallible ,ca?olic40 ,lyman ,abbott3 8,! new ,re=mation d5ies ! infallibility ( ! ,bible1 z ! ,prote/ant ,re=mation d5i$ ! infallibility ( ! ,*ur*4 ,!re is no infallible au?ority4 ,infallible au?ority is undesirable4444 ,god has giv5 u some?+ f> bett]1--life4444 ,! ,bible is ! record ( ! gradual manife/ation ( ,god to man 9 human exp]i5ce1 9 moral laws & _! applications1 & 9 ! life ( ,him :o 0 ,god manife/ 9 ! fle%40 ,leighton ,williams3 8,!re is no inspiration ap>t f exp]i5ce4 ,bapti/s are n sacram5tal1 nor cre$al1 b exp]im5tal ,*ri/ians0--n ,romani/s1 nor ,prote/ants1 b believ]s 9 an inn] light4 8,life1 z x develops1 awak5s into self-consci\sness4 ,t self-consci\sness becomes ! mo/ reliable witness z to ! nature ( ! life ( :i* x is ! developm5t4 ,)9 ! limits ( its own sph]e1 its au?ority is supreme4 ,prophecy is ! utt]ance ( ! s\l 9 mom5ts ( deep religi\s exp]i5ce4 ,! inspiration ( ,scripture writ]s is n a peculi> ?+1--x 0 giv5 t ! same inspiration might be p]fect$ 9 ^? :o read _! writ+s40 ,*ri/ is ! only ultimate au?ority1 & he reveals himself 9 ?ree ways1 ?r\gh ,scripture1 ! ,reason1 & ! ,*ur*4 ,only ,life saves1 & ! ,way leads ?r\gh ! ,tru? to ! ,life4 ,bapti/s /& ne>] to ! ,episcopal sy/em ( life ?an to ! ,presbyt]ian sy/em ( cre$4 ,:iton1 ,gloria ,patri1 #acf--8,! mi/ake is 9 look+ to ! ,fa!r above ! _w1 r ?an to ! ,son & ! ,_s )9 ! _w1 z ! imm$iate s\rce ( revelation4444 ,revelation is ! unfold+ ( ! life & ?\ght ( ,god )9 ! _w4 ,"o %\ld n be tr\bl$ by f9d+ errors 9 ! ,scriptures1 any m ?an by f9d+ imp]fections 9 any physical "w ( ,god1 z 9 ! human eye40 #c4 ,! ,dictation-!ory4 ,?is !ory holds t inspiration consi/$ 9 su* a possession ( ! m9ds & bodies ( ! ,scripture writ]s by ! ,holy ,_s1 t !y became passive in/rum5ts or amanu5ses--p5s1 n p5m51 ( ,god4 ,?is !ory naturally connects itself ) t view ( miracles :i* reg>ds !m z susp5sions or violations ( natural law4 ,dorn]1 ,glaub5slehre1 #a3fbd 7transl4 #b3ahf-ahi71 calls x a 8docetic view ( inspiration4 ,x holds to ! abolition ( second causes1 & to ! p]fect passivity ( ! human in/rum5t2 d5ies any inspiration ( p]sons1 & ma9ta9s inspiration ( writ+s only4 ,?is exagg]ation ( ! div9e elem5t l$ to ! hypo!sis ( a multi=m div9e s5se 9 ,scripture1 &1 9 assign+ ! spiritual mean+1 a rationaliz+ _s l$ ! way40 ,repres5tatives ( ?is view are ,qu5/$t1 ,!ol4 ,didact41 #a3gf--8,! ,holy ,gho/ inspir$ 8 amanu5ses ) ^? expressions :i* !y w\ld h employ$1 _h !y be5 left to !mselves02 ,hook]1 ,works1 #b3chc--8,!y nei!r spake nor wrote any ^w ( _! own1 b utt]$ syllable by syllable z ! ,_s put x into _! m\?s02 ,gauss51 ,!opneu/y1 #fa--8,! ,bible is n a book :i* ,god *>g$ m5 already enlight5$ to make "u 8 protection2 x is a book :i* ,god dictat$ to !m02 ,cunn+ham1 ,!ol4 ,lectures1 #cdi--8,! v]bal inspiration ( ! ,scriptures :i* he advocates implies 9 g5]al t ! words ( ,scripture 7 sugge/$ or dictat$ by ! ,holy ,_s1 z well z ! sub/ance ( ! matt]1 & ?is1 n only 9 "s portion ( ! ,scriptures1 b ?r\gh ! :ole40 ,?is rem9ds u ( ! old !ory t ,god creat$ fossils 9 ! rocks1 z !y w\ld be _h anci5t seas exi/$4 ,s&ay1 ,bamp4 ,lect4 on ,inspiration1 #gd1 quotes ,philo z say+3 8,a prophet gives =? no?+ at all ( 8 own1 b acts z int]pret] at ! prompt+ ( ano!r 9 all 8 utt]ances1 & z long z he is "u inspiration he is 9 ignorance1 8 reason dep>t+ f its place & yield+ up ! citadel ( ! s\l1 :5 ! div9e ,_s ent]s into x & dwells 9 x & /rikes at ! me*anism ( ! voice1 s\nd+ ?r\gh x to ! cle> decl>ation ( t :i* he prophesie?02 9 ,g54 #ae3ab--8;,ab\t ! sett+ ( ! sun a trance came ^u ,abram0--! sun is ! light ( human reason :i* sets & gives place to ! ,_s ( ,god4 ,s&ay1 #gh1 says also3 8,josephus holds t ev5 hi/orical n>ratives1 su* z ^? at ! beg9n+ ( ! ,p5tateu* :i* 7 n writt5 d[n by contempor>y prophets1 7 obta9$ by direct inspiration f ,god4 ,! ,jews f _! bir? reg>d _! ,scripture z #8! decrees ( ,god1' :i* !y /rictly obs]ve1 & = :i* if ne$ be !y are ready to die40 ,! ,rabbis said t 8,moses did n write "o ^w out ( 8 own k40 ,! ,re=m]s held to a mu* fre] view ?an ?is4 ,lu!r said3 8,:at does n c>ry ,*ri/ ) x1 is n apo/olic1 ev5 ?\gh ,/4 ,pet] or ,/4 ,paul taught x4 ,if our adv]s>ies fall back on ! ,scripture aga9/ ,*ri/1 we fall back on ,*ri/ aga9/ ! ,scripture40 ,lu!r refus$ canonical au?ority to books n actually writt5 by apo/les or compos$1 l ,m>k & ,luke1 "u _! direction4 ,s he reject$ f ! rank ( canonical au?ority ,hebrews1 ,james1 ,jude1 #b ,pet] & ,revelation4 ,ev5 ,calv9 d\bt$ ! ,petr9e au?or%ip ( #b ,pet]1 exclud$ ! book ( ,revelation f ! ,scripture on :i* he wrote ,comm5t>ies1 & also ?us ignor$ ! second & ?ird epi/les ( ,john2 see ,pr(4 ,r4 ,e4 ,?ompson1 9 ,s4 ,s4 ,times1 ,dec4 #c1 #ahih3hjc1 #hjd4 ,! dictation-!ory is po/-,re=mation4 ,h4 ,p4 ,smi?1 ,bib4 ,s*ol>%ip & ,inspiration1 #he--8;,aft] ! ,c\ncil ( ,tr5t1 ! ,roman ,ca?olic polemic became %>p]4 ,x became ! endeavor ( t p>ty to %[ ! necessity ( tradition & ! untru/wor?9ess ( ,scripture alone4 ,?is l$ ! ,prote/ants to def5d ! ,bible m t5aci\sly ?an be=e40 ,! ,swiss ,=mula ( ,cons5sus 9 #afge n only call$ ! ,scriptures 8! v ^w ( ,god10 b decl>$ ! ,hebrew v[el-po9ts to be inspir$1 & "s !ologians trac$ !m back to ,adam4 ,john ,ow5 held to ! inspiration ( ! v[el-po9ts2 see ,horton1 ,inspiration & ,bible1 #h4 ,( ! age :i* produc$ ! ,prote/ant dogmatic !ology1 ,*>les ,be>d1 9 ! ,hibb]t ,lectures = #ahhc1 says3 8,i "k no epo* ( ,*ri/ianity to :i* ,i c\ld m confid5tly po9t 9 illu/ration ( ! fact t :]e !re is mo/ !ology1 !re is (t5 lea/ religion40 ,( ?is view we may rem>k3 7a7 ,we grant t !re are in/ances :5 ,god's communications 7 utt]$ 9 an audible voice & took a def9ite =m ( words1 & t ?is 0 sometimes accompani$ ) ! comm& to commit ! words to writ+4 ,= examples1 see ,ex4 #c3d--8;,god call$ unto him out ( ! mid/ ( ! bu%1 & said1 ,moses1 ,moses02 #bj3bb--8,ye y\rselves h se5 t ,i h talk$ ) y f heav502 cf4 ,heb4 #ab3ai--8! voice ( words2 :i* voice !y t he>d entreat$ t no ^w m %\ld be spok5 unto !m02 ,numb]s #g3hi--8;,& :5 ,moses w5t into ! t5t ( meet+ to speak ) him1 !n he he>d ! ,voice speak+ unto him f above ! m]cy-seat t 0 ^u ! ark ( ! te/imony1 f betwe5 ! two *]ubim3 & he spake unto him02 #h3a--8;,& ,jehovah spake unto ,moses1 say+10 etc42 ,dan4 #d3ca--8,:ile ! ^w 0 9 ! k+'s m\?1 !re fell a voice f heav51 say+1 ,o k+ ,nebu*adnezz>1 to !e x is spok53 ,! k+dom is dep>t$ f !e02 ,acts #i3e--8;,& he said1 ,:o art ?\1 ,"l8 ,& he said1 ,i am ,jesus :om ?\ p]secute/02 ,rev4 #ai3i--8;,& he sai? unto me1 ,write1 ,bless$ are !y t are bidd5 to ! m>riage supp] ( ! ,lamb02 #ba3e--8;,& he t sitte? on ! ?rone said1 ,behold1 ,i make all ?+s new02 cf4 #a3aj1 #aa--8;& ,i he>d beh9d me a great voice1 z ( a trumpet say+1 ,:at ?\ see/1 write 9 a book & s5d x to ! sev5 *ur*es40 ,s ! voice f heav5 at ! baptism1 & at ! transfiguration1 ( ,jesus 7,mat4 #c3ag1 & #ag3e2 see ,broadus1 ,am]4 ,com41 on ^! passages74 7b7 ,! !ory 9 "q1 h[ev]1 re/s ^u a p>tial induction ( ,scripture facts1--unw>rantably assum+ t su* occasional in/ances ( direct dictation reveal ! inv>iable me?od ( ,god's communications ( tru? to ! writ]s ( ! ,bible4 ,scripture n[h]e decl>es t ?is imm$iate communication ( ! words 0 univ]sal4 ,on #a ,cor4 #b3ac-- 1 1 1 ! text usually cit$ z pro( ( inv>iable dictation--,mey] says3 8,!re is no dictation "h2 excludes ev]y?+ me*anical40 ,h5d]son1 ,inspiration 7#bnd ed471 #ccc1 #cdi--8;,z human wisdom did n dictate ^w = ^w1 s ! ,_s did n40 ,paul claims = ,scripture simply a g5]al /yle ( pla9ness :i* is due to ! influ5ce ( ! ,_s4 ,manly3 8,dictation to an amanu5sis is n tea*+40 ,our ,revis$ ,v]sion prop]ly translates ! rema9d] ( ! v]se1 #a ,cor4 #b3ac--8;comb9+ spiritual ?+s ) spiritual words40 7c7 ,x _c acc\nt = ! manife/ly human elem5t 9 ! ,scriptures4 ,!re are peculi>ities ( /yle :i* di/+ui% ! productions ( ea* writ] f ^? ( e o!r1 & !re are v>iations 9 acc\nts ( ! same transaction :i* are inconsi/5t ) ! !ory ( a solely div9e au?or%ip4 ,notice ,paul's anacol\?a & 8 bur/s ( grief & indignation 7,rom4 #e3ab sq41 #b ,cor4 #aa3a sq471 & 8 ignorance ( ! precise numb] :om he _h baptiz$ 7#a ,cor4 #a3af74 ,"o begg> or two 7,mat4 #bj3cj2 cf4 ,luke #ah3ce72 8ab\t five & tw5ty or ?irty furlongs0 7,john #f3ai72 8%$ = _m0 7,mat4 #bf3bh has 1 ,m>k #ad3bd & ,luke #bb3bj h 74 ,dictation ( words :i* 7 imm$iately to be lo/ by imp]fect transcription8 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #cc-cg--8,we are "u no obligation to ma9ta9 ! complete in]rancy ( ! ,scriptures4 ,9 !m we h ! fre$om ( life1 r ?an extraord9>y precision ( /atem5t or accuracy ( detail4 ,we h become ,*ri/ians 9 spite ( diff]5ces betwe5 ! evangeli/s4 ,! ,scriptures are v>i\s1 progressive1 free4 ,!re is no au?ority 9 ,scripture = apply+ ! ^w 'inspir$' to our pres5t ,bible z a :ole1 & !ology is n b\nd to employ ?is ^w 9 def9+ ! ,scriptures4 ,*ri/ianity is f\nd$ 9 hi/ory1 & w /& :e!r ! ,scriptures are inspir$ or n4 ,if special inspiration 7 :olly disprov$1 ,*ri/ w\ld /ill be ! ,savior ( ! _w4 ,b ! div9e elem5t 9 ! ,scriptures w nev] be disprov$40 7d7 ,x is inconsi/5t ) a wise economy ( means1 to suppose t ! ,scripture writ]s %\ld h _h dictat$ to !m :at !y knew already1 or :at !y c\ld in=m !mselves ( by ! use ( _! natural p[]s4 ,:y employ eye-witnesses at all8 ,:y n dictate ! gospels to ,g5tiles liv+ a ?\s& ye>s be=e8 ,god respects ! in/rum5ts he has call$ into be+1 & he uses !m accord+ to _! con/itutional gifts4 ,george ,eliot repres5ts ,/radiv>ius z say+3--8,if my h& slack$1 ,i %\ld rob ,god--s9ce he is fulle/ good--,leav+ a blank in/ead ( viol9s4 ,god _c make ,antonio ,/radiv>i's viol9s1 ,)\t ,antonio40 ,m>k #aa3c--8,! ,"l ha? ne$ ( him10 may apply to man z well z bea/4 7e7 ,x contradicts :at we "k ( ! law ( ,god's work+ 9 ! s\l4 ,! high] & nobl] ,god's communications1 ! m fully is man 9 possession & use ( 8 own faculties4 ,we _c suppose t ?is highe/ "w ( man "u ! influ5ce ( ! ,_s 0 purely me*anical4 ,joseph receives communication by vision 7,mat4 #a3bj72 ,m>y1 by words ( an angel spok5 9 h] wak+ mom5ts 7,luke #a3bh74 ,! m advanc$ ! recipi5t1 ! m consci\s ! communication4 ,^! f\r !ories might almo/ be call$ ! ,pelagian1 ! ,arm9ian1 ! ,docetic1 & ! ,dynamical4 ,sabati]1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #da1 #db1 #hg--8;,9 ! ,gospel ( ! ,hebrews1 ! ,fa!r says at ! baptism to ,jesus3 #8,my ,son1 9 all ! prophets ,i 0 wait+ = !e1 t ?\ mighte/ come1 & t ,i might re/ 9 !e4 ,= ?\ art my ,re/4' ,inspiration becomes m & m int]nal1 until 9 ,*ri/ x is cont9u\s & complete4 ,^u ! opposite ,docetic view1 ! mo/ p]fect inspiration %\ld h be5 t ( ,balaam's ass40 ,seml] repres5ts ! ,pelagian or ,ebionitic view1 z ,qu5/$t repres5ts ?is ,docetic view4 ,seml] localizes & temporalizes ! cont5ts ( ,scripture4 ,yet1 ?\gh he c>ri$ ?is to ! extreme ( exclud+ any div9e au?or%ip1 he did good s]vice 9 lead+ ! way to ! hi/orical /udy ( ! ,bible4 #d4 ,! ,dynamical ,!ory4 ,! true view holds1 9 opposition to ! fir/ ( ^! !ories1 t inspiration is n simply a natural b also a sup]natural fact1 & t x is ! imm$iate "w ( a p]sonal ,god 9 ! s\l ( man4 ,x holds1 9 opposition to ! second1 t inspiration belongs1 n only to ! m5 :o wrote ! ,scriptures1 b to ! ,scriptures :i* !y wrote1 s t ^! ,scriptures1 :5 tak5 toge!r1 con/itute a tru/wor?y & suffici5t record ( div9e revelation4 ,x holds1 9 opposition to ! ?ird !ory1 t ! ,scriptures conta9 a human z well z a div9e elem5t1 s t :ile !y pres5t a body ( div9ely reveal$ tru?1 ?is tru? is %ap$ 9 human m\lds & adapt$ to ord9>y human intellig5ce4 ,9 %ort1 inspiration is *>act]i/ically nei!r natural1 p>tial1 nor me*anical1 b sup]natural1 pl5>y1 & dynamical4 ,fur!r explanations w be gr\p$ "u ! head ( ,! ,union ( ! ,div9e & ,human ,elem5ts 9 ,inspiration1 9 ! section :i* imm$iately foll[s4 ,if ! small circle be tak5 z symbol ( ! human elem5t 9 inspiration1 & ! l>ge circle z symbol ( ! div9e1 !n ! ,intuition-!ory w\ld be repres5t$ by ! small circle alone2 ! ,dictation-!ory by ! l>ge circle alone2 ! ,illum9ation-!ory by ! small circle ext]nal to ! l>ge1 & t\*+ x at only a s+le po9t2 ! ,dynamical-!ory by two conc5tric circles1 ! small includ$ 9 ! l>ge4 ,ev5 :5 inspiration is b ! exaltation & int5sification ( man's natural p[]s1 x mu/ be consid]$ ! "w ( ,god z well z ( man4 ,god c "w f )9 z well z f )\t4 ,z creation & reg5]ation are works ( ! imman5t r ?an ( ! transc5d5t ,god1 s inspiration is 9 g5]al a "w )9 man's s\l1 r ?an a communication to him f )\t4 ,prophecy may be natural to p]fect humanity4 ,revelation is an unveil+1 & ! ,rntg5 rays enable u to see ?r\gh a veil4 ,b ! insight ( ! ,scripture writ]s into tru? s f> beyond _! m5tal & moral p[]s is inexplicable except by a sup]natural influ5ce ^u _! m9ds2 9 o!r words1 except z !y 7 lift$ up into ! div9e ,reason & end[$ ) ! wisdom ( ,god4 ,al?\gh we propose ?is ,dynamical-!ory z "o :i* be/ expla9s ! ,scripture facts1 we d n reg>d ?is or any o!r !ory z ( ess5tial importance4 ,no !ory ( inspiration is necess>y to ,*ri/ian fai?4 ,revelation prec$es inspiration4 ,!re 0 religion be=e ! ,old ,te/am5t1 & an oral gospel be=e ! ,new ,te/am5t4 ,god might reveal )\t record+2 might p]mit record )\t inspiration2 might inspire )\t v\*+ = any?+ m ?an religi\s tea*+ & = ! hi/ory1 only s f> z 0 necess>y to t religi\s tea*+4 ,:atev] !ory ( inspiration we frame1 %\ld be ! result ( a /rict induction ( ! ,scripture facts1 & n an a priori s*eme to :i* ,scripture mu/ be con=m$4 ,! fault ( _m pa/ discussions ( ! subject is ! assumption t ,god mu/ adopt "s p>ticul> me?od ( inspiration1 or secure an absolute p]fection ( detail 9 matt]s n ess5tial to ! religi\s tea*+ ( ,scripture4 ,p]haps ! be/ !ory ( inspiration is to h no !ory4 ,w>field & ,hodge1 ,inspiration1 #h--8,v _m religi\s & hi/orical tru?s mu/ be e/abli%$ be=e we come to ! "q ( inspiration1 z = in/ance ! be+ & moral gov]nm5t ( ,god1 ! fall5 condition ( man1 ! fact ( a r$emptive s*eme1 ! g5]al hi/orical tru? ( ! ,scriptures1 & ! validity & au?ority ( ! revelation ( ,god's w :i* !y conta91 i4 e41 ! g5]al tru? ( ,*ri/ianity & ( its doctr9es4 ,h5ce x foll[s t :ile ! inspiration ( ! ,scriptures is true1 & be+ true is a pr9ciple fundam5tal to ! adequate int]pretation ( ,scripture1 x nev]!less is n1 9 ! fir/ in/ance1 a pr9ciple fundam5tal to ! tru? ( ! ,*ri/ian religion40 ,w>field1 9 ,presb4 & ,ref4 ,rev41 ,april1 #ahic3bjh--8,we d n f\nd ! :ole ,*ri/ian sy/em on ! doctr9e ( inspiration4444 ,7 !re no su* ?+ z inspiration1 ,*ri/ianity w\ld be true1 & all its ess5tial doctr9es w\ld be cr$ibly witness$ to u0--9 ! gospels & 9 ! liv+ *ur*4 ,f4 ,l4 ,patton1 ,inspiration1 #bb--8;,i mu/ take exception to ! disposition ( "s to /ake ! =tunes ( ,*ri/ianity on ! doctr9e ( inspiration4 ,n t ,i yield to any "o 9 pr(\nd conviction ( ! tru? & importance ( ! doctr9e4 ,b x is prop] = u to be> 9 m9d ! imm5se argum5tative advantage :i* ,*ri/ianity has1 aside altoge!r f ! inspiration ( ! docum5ts on :i* x re/s40 ,s argue also ,s&ay1 ,oracles ( ,god1 & ,dale1 ,! ,liv+ ,*ri/4 ,,iv4 ,! ,union ( ! ,div9e & ,human ,elem5ts 9 ,inspiration4 #a4 ,! ,scriptures are ! production equally ( ,god & ( man1 & are !re=e nev] to be reg>d$ z m]ely human or m]ely div9e4 ,! my/]y ( inspiration consi/s 9 nei!r ( ^! t]ms sep>ately1 b 9 ! union ( ! two4 ,( ?is1 h[ev]1 !re are analogies 9 ! int]p5etration ( human p[]s by ! div9e effici5cy 9 reg5]ation & sanctification1 & 9 ! union ( ! div9e & human natures 9 ! p]son ( ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,accord+ to 8,dalton's law10 ea* gas is z a vacuum to e o!r3 8,gases are mutually passive1 & pass into ea* o!r z into vacua40 ,ea* int]p5etrates ! o!r4 ,b ?is does n furni% a p]fect illu/ration ( our subject4 ,! atom ( oxyg5 & ! atom ( nitrog51 9 common air1 rema9 side by side b !y d n unite4 ,9 inspiration ! human & ! div9e elem5ts d unite4 ,! ,lu!ran maxim1 8,m5s humana capax div910 is "o ( ! mo/ important pr9ciples ( a true !ology4 8,! ,lu!rans ?9k ( humanity z a ?+ made by ,god = himself & to receive himself4 ,! ,re=m$ ?9k ( ! ,deity z ev] pres]v+ himself f any confusion ) ! creature4 ,!y fe> pan!ism & idolatry0 7,bp4 ( ,salisbury1 quot$ 9 ,swayne1 ,our ,"l's ,k1 xx74 ,sabati]1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #ff--8,t initial my/]y1 ! relation 9 our consci\sness betwe5 ! individual & ! univ]sal elem5t1 betwe5 ! f9ite & ! inf9ite1 betwe5 ,god & man1--h[ c we compreh5d _! coxi/5ce & _! union1 & yet h[ c we d\bt x8 ,:]e is ! ?\ghtful man to-day :o has n brok5 ! ?9 cru/ ( 8 daily life1 & caught a glimpse ( ^? pr(\nd & obscure wat]s on :i* floats our consci\sness8 ,:o has n felt )9 himself a veil$ pres5ce1 & a =ce mu* great] ?an 8 own8 ,:at work] 9 a l(ty cause has n p]ceiv$ )9 8 own p]sonal activity1 & salut$ ) a feel+ ( v5]ation1 ! my/]i\s activity ( a univ]sal & et]nal ,p[]8 #8,9 ,deo vivimus1 movemur1 et sumus4'444 ,?is my/]y _c be dissipat$1 = )\t x religion itself w\ld no long] exi/40 ,quack5bos1 9 ,h>p]'s ,magaz9e1 ,july1 #aijj3bfd1 says t 8hypnotic sugge/ion is b inspiration40 ,! analogy ( human influ5ce ?us communicat$ may at lea/ help u to "s und]/&+ ( ! div9e4 #b4 ,?is union ( ! div9e & human ag5cies 9 inspiration is n to be conceiv$ ( z "o ( ext]nal imp>tation & reception4 ,on ! o!r h&1 ^? :om ,god rais$ up & provid5tially qualifi$ to d ?is "w1 spoke & wrote ! words ( ,god1 :5 inspir$1 n z f )\t1 b z f )91 & t n passively1 b 9 ! mo/ consci\s possession & ! mo/ exalt$ ex]cise ( _! own p[]s ( intellect1 emotion1 & w4 ,! ,holy ,_s does n dwell 9 man z wat] 9 a vessel4 ,we may r illu/rate ! exp]i5ce ( ! ,scripture writ]s by ! exp]i5ce ( ! prea*] :o "u ! influ5ce ( ,god's ,_s is c>ri$ beyond himself1 & is consci\s ( a cle>] appreh5sion ( tru? & ( a great] ability to utt] x ?an belong to 8 unaid$ nature1 yet kn[s himself to be no passive vehicle ( a div9e communication1 b to be z nev] be=e 9 possession & ex]cise ( 8 own p[]s4 ,! inspiration ( ! ,scripture writ]s1 h[ev]1 goes f> beyond ! illum9ation grant$ to ! prea*]1 9 t x qualifies !m to put ! tru?1 )\t error1 into p]man5t & writt5 =m4 ,?is inspiration1 moreov]1 is m ?an provid5tial prep>ation4 ,l miracles1 inspiration may use man's natural p[]s1 b man's natural p[]s d n expla9 x4 ,moses1 ,david1 ,paul1 & ,john 7 provid5tially end[$ & educat$ = _! "w ( writ+ ,scripture1 b ?is end[m5t & education 7 n inspiration itself1 b only ! prep>ation = x4 ,beys*lag3 8,) ,john1 remembrance & exposition _h become insep>able40 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son2 8,noveli/s d n create *>act]s1--!y reproduce ) modifications mat]ial pres5t$ to _! memories4 ,s ! apo/les reproduc$ _! impressions ( ,*ri/40 ,hutton1 ,essays1 #b3bca--8,! ,psalmi/s vacillate betwe5 ! fir/ p]son & ! ?ird1 :5 !y deliv] ! purposes ( ,god4 ,z !y w>m ) _! spiritual inspiration1 !y lose !mselves 9 ! p]son ( ,him :o inspires !m1 & !n !y are aga9 recall$ to !mselves40 ,/anley1 ,life & ,lett]s1 #a3chj--8,revelation is n resolv$ into a m]e human process because we are able to di/+ui% ! natural ag5cies ?r\gh :i* x 0 communicat$02 #b3ajb--8,y seem to me to transf] too mu* to ^! anci5t prophets & writ]s & *iefs our mod]n notions ( div9e orig94444 ,our notion1 or r1 ! mod]n ,puritanical notion ( div9e orig91 is ( a pret]natural =ce or voice1 putt+ aside second>y ag5cies1 & sep>at$ f ^? ag5cies by an impassable gulf4 ,! anci5t1 ,ori5tal1 ,biblical notion 0 ( a supreme ,w act+ ?r\gh ^? ag5cies1 or r1 be+ insep>able f !m4 ,our notions ( inspiration & div9e communications insi/ on absolute p]fection ( fact1 morals1 doctr9e4 ,! ,biblical notion 0 t inspiration 0 compatible ) weakness1 infirmity1 contradiction40 ,ladd1 ,philosophy ( ,m9d1 #ahb--8;,9 inspiration ! ?\ghts1 feel+s1 purposes are organiz$ into ano!r ,"o ?an ! self 9 :i* !y 7 !mselves born4 ,t o!r ,"o is 9 !mselves4 ,!y ent] into communication ) ,him4 ,yet ?is may be sup]natural1 ev5 ?\gh natural psy*ological means are us$4 ,inspiration :i* is ext]nal is n inspiration at all40 ,?is la/ s5t5ce1 h[ev]1 seems to u a ne$less exagg]ation ( ! true pr9ciple4 ,?\gh ,god orig9ally inspires f )91 he may also communicate tru? f )\t4 #c4 ,inspiration1 !re=e1 did n remove1 b r press$ into its own s]vice1 all ! p]sonal peculi>ities ( ! writ]s1 toge!r ) _! defects ( culture & lit]>y /yle4 ,e imp]fection n inconsi/5t ) tru? 9 a human composition may exi/ 9 inspir$ ,scripture4 ,! ,bible is ,god's ^w1 9 ! s5se t x pres5ts to u div9e tru? 9 human =ms1 & is a revelation n = a select class b = ! common m9d4 ,rightly und]/ood1 ?is v humanity ( ! ,bible is a pro( ( its div9ity4 ,locke3 8,:5 ,god made ! prophet1 he did n unmake ! man40 ,pr(4 ,day3 8,! bu% 9 :i* ,god appe>$ to ,moses rema9$ a bu%1 :ile yet burn+ ) ! brightness ( ,god & utt]+ =? ! maje/y ( ! m9d ( ,god40 ,! p>agraphs ( ! ,koran are call$ ayat1 or 8sign10 f _! suppos$ sup]natural elegance4 ,b elegant lit]>y productions d n t\* ! he>t4 ,! ,bible is n m]ely ! ^w ( ,god2 x is also ! ^w made fle%4 ,! ,holy ,_s hides himself1 t he may %[ =? ,*ri/ 7,john #c3h72 he is kn[n only by 8 effects--a patt]n = prea*]s1 :o are m9i/]s ( ! ,_s 7#b ,cor4 #c3f74 ,see ,conant on ,g5esis1 #fe4 ,! ,moslem decl>es t e ^w ( ! ,koran came by ! ag5cy ( ,gabriel f ! sev5? heav51 & t its v pronunciation is inspir$4 ,bett] ! doctr9e ( ,m>t9eau1 ,seat ( ,au?ority1 #bhi--8,?\gh ! patt]n be div9e1 ! web t be>s x mu/ /ill be human40 ,jackson1 ,james ,m>t9eau1 #bee--8,paul's metaphor ( ! #8treasure 9 e>!n vessels' 7#b ,cor4 #d3g7 y _c all[ to give y guidance2 y want1 n ! treasure only1 b ! casket too1 to come f above1 & be ( ! cry/al ( ! sky4 ,y want ! record to be div9e1 n only 9 its _s1 b also 9 its lett]40 ,*>les ,hodge1 ,sy/4 ,!ol41 #a3aeg--8,:5 ,god orda9s praise out ( ! m\?s ( babes1 !y mu/ speak z babes1 or ! :ole p[] & beauty ( ! tribute w be lo/40 ,evans1 ,bib4 ,s*ol>%ip & ,inspiration1 #af1 #be--8,! ( a dead w9d is nev] *ang$1 z ! ,rabbis ( old ?\ght1 into ! ( a liv+ _s4 ,! rav5 t f$ ,elijah 0 no?+ m ?an a bird4 ,nor does man1 :5 sup]naturally influ5c$1 cease to be a man4 ,an inspir$ man is n ,god1 nor a div9ely manipulat$ automaton02 8,9 ,scripture !re may be z mu* imp]fection z1 9 ! p>ts ( any organism1 w\ld be consi/5t ) ! p]fect adaptation ( t organism to its de/9$ end4 ,scripture !n1 tak5 toge!r1 is a /atem5t ( moral & religi\s tru? suffici5t = m5's salvation1 or an infallible & suffici5t rule ( fai? & practice40 ,j4 ,s4 ,wrightn\r3 8,inspire means to brea! 91 z a flute-play] brea!s into 8 in/rum5t4 ,z diff]5t flutes may h _! own %apes1 peculi>ities1 & :at might seem l defects1 s "h2 yet all are brea!d into by "o ,_s4 ,! same ,_s :o inspir$ !m select$ ^? in/rum5ts :i* 7 be/ = 8 purpose1 z ! ,savior select$ 8 apo/les4 ,9 ^! writ+s !re=e is giv5 u1 9 ! precise way t is be/ = u1 ! spiritual in/ruction & food t we ne$4 ,food = ! body is n always giv5 9 ! mo/ conc5trat$ =m1 b 9 ! =m t is be/ adapt$ = dige/ion4 ,s ,god gives gold1 n 9 co9 ready /amp$1 b 9 ! qu>tz ( ! m9e :5ce x has to be dug & smelt$40 ,rema9s ( ,ar?ur ,h4 ,hallam1 9 ,john ,br[n's ,rab & 8 ,fri5ds1 #bgd--8;,i see t ! ,bible fits 9 to e fold ( ! human he>t4 ,i am a man1 & ,i believe x is ,god's book1 because x is man's book40 #d4 ,9 inspiration ,god may use all "r & normal me?ods ( lit]>y composition4 ,z we recognize 9 lit]ature ! prop] function ( hi/ory1 poetry1 & fiction2 ( prophecy1 p>able1 & drama2 ( p]sonification & prov]b2 ( allegory & dogmatic in/ruction2 & ev5 ( my? & leg5d2 we _c d5y ! possibility t ,god may use any "o ( ^! me?ods ( communicat+ tru?1 leav+ x to u to det]m9e 9 any s+le case :i* ( ^! me?ods he has adopt$4 ,9 inspiration1 z 9 reg5]ation & sanctification1 ,god works 89 div]s mann]s0 7,heb4 #a3a74 ,! ,scriptures1 l ! books ( secul> lit]ature1 mu/ be int]pret$ 9 ! light ( _! purpose4 ,poetry mu/ n be treat$ z prose1 & p>able mu/ n be made to 8g on all f\rs10 :5 x 0 meant to walk erect & to tell "o simple /ory4 ,drama is n hi/ory1 nor is p]sonification to be reg>d$ z biography4 ,!re is a rhetorical ov]/atem5t :i* is int5d$ only z a vivid emphasiz+ ( important tru?4 ,allegory is a popul> mode ( illu/ration4 ,ev5 my? & leg5d may convey great lessons n o!rwise appreh5sible to infantile or untra9$ m9ds4 ,a lit]>y s5se is ne$$ 9 our judgm5ts ( ,scripture1 & mu* ho/ile criticism is lack+ 9 ?is lit]>y s5se4 ,d5ney1 ,/udies 9 ,!ology1 #bah--8,!re is a /age 9 :i* ! :ole cont5ts ( ! m9d1 z yet incapable ( sci5ce or hi/ory1 may be call$ my?ological4 ,& :at criticism %[s u1 9 its treatm5t ( ! e>ly *apt]s ( ,g5esis1 is t ,god does n disda9 to speak to ! m9d1 nor ?r\gh x1 ev5 :5 x is at ?is l[ly /age4 ,ev5 ! my?1 9 :i* ! beg9n+s ( human life1 ly+ beyond human rese>*1 are repres5t$ to itself by ! *ild-m9d ( ! race1 may be made ! m$ium ( revelation4444 ,b t does n make ! fir/ *apt] ( ,g5esis sci5ce1 nor ! ?ird *apt] hi/ory4 ,& :at is ( au?ority 9 ^! *apt]s is n ! quasi-sci5tific or quasi-hi/orical =m1 b ! message1 :i* ?r\gh !m comes to ! he>t1 ( ,god's creative wisdom & p[]40 ,gore1 9 ,lux ,mundi1 #cef--8,! v>i\s sorts ( m5tal or lit]>y activity develop 9 _! diff]5t l9es out ( an e>li] condition 9 :i* !y lie fus$ & undiff]5tiat$4 ,?is we c vaguely call ! my?ical /age ( m5tal evolution4 ,a my? is n a falsehood2 x is a product ( m5tal activity1 z in/ructive & ri* z any lat] product1 b its *>act]i/ic is t x is n yet di/+ui%$ into hi/ory & poetry & philosophy40 ,s ,grote calls ! ,greek my?s ! :ole intellectual /ock ( ! age to :i* !y belong$--! common root ( all ! hi/ory1 poetry1 philosophy1 !ology1 :i* aft]w>ds div]g$ & proce$$ f x4 ,s ! e>ly "p ( ,g5esis may be ( ! nature ( my? 9 :i* we _c di/+ui% ! hi/orical g]m1 ?\gh we d n d5y t x exi/s4 ,rob]t ,br[n+'s ,clive & ,&rea del ,s>to are ess5tially correct repres5tations ( hi/orical *>act]s1 ?\gh ! details 9 ea* poem are imag9>y4 #e4 ,! inspir+ ,_s has giv5 ! ,scriptures to ! _w by a process ( gradual evolution4 ,z 9 communicat+ ! tru?s ( natural sci5ce1 ,god has communicat$ ! tru?s ( religion by successive /eps1 g]m9ally at fir/1 m fully z m5 h be5 able to compreh5d !m4 ,! education ( ! race is analog\s to ! education ( ! *ild4 ,fir/ came pictures1 object-lessons1 ext]nal rites1 pr$ictions2 !n ! key to ^! 9 ,*ri/1 & !n didactic exposition 9 ! ,epi/les4 ,!re h be5 8div]s portions10 z well z 8div]s mann]s0 7,heb4 #a3a74 ,! e>ly prophecies l t ( ,g54 #c3ae--! se$ ( ! woman bruis+ ! s]p5t's head--7 b fa9t glimm]+s ( ! dawn4 ,m5 _h to be rais$ up :o 7 capable ( receiv+ & transmitt+ ! div9e communications4 ,moses1 ,david1 ,isaiah m>k successive advances 9 recipi5cy & transp>5cy to ! heav5ly light4 ,inspiration has employ$ m5 ( v>i\s degrees ( ability1 culture & religi\s insight4 ,z all ! tru?s ( ! calculus lie g]m9ally 9 ! simple/ ma!matical axiom1 s all ! tru?s ( salvation may be wrapp$ up 9 ! /atem5t t ,god is hol9ess & love4 ,b n e s*ol> c evolve ! calculus f ! axiom4 ,! tea*] may dictate propositions :i* ! pupil does n und]/&3 he may demon/rate 9 su* a way t ! pupil p>ticipates 9 ! process2 or1 be/ ( all1 he may incite ! pupil to "w out ! demon/ration = himself4 ,god seems to h us$ all ^! me?ods4 ,b :ile !re are in/ances ( dictation & illum9ation1 & inspiration sometimes includes ^!1 ! g5]al me?od seems to h be5 su* a div9e quick5+ ( man's p[]s t he discov]s & expresses ! tru? = himself4 ,a4 ,j4 ,balf\r1 ,f\ndations ( ,belief1 #cci--8;,inspiration is t1 se5 f its div9e side1 :i* we call discov]y :5 se5 f ! human side4444 ,e addition to k1 :e!r 9 ! individual or ! community1 :e!r sci5tific1 e?ical or !ological1 is due to a cop]ation betwe5 ! human s\l :i* assimilates & ! div9e p[] :i* inspires4 ,nei!r acts1 or c\ld act1 9 indep5d5t isolation4 ,= #8unassi/$ reason' is a fiction1 & pure receptivity x is impossible to conceive4 ,ev5 ! emptie/ vessel mu/ limit ! quantity & det]m9e ! configuration ( any liquid ) :i* x may be fill$4444 ,inspiration is limit$ to no age1 to no c\ntry1 to no p40 ,! e>ly ,semites _h x1 & ! great ,ori5tal re=m]s4 ,!re c be no ga!r+ ( grapes f ?orns1 or ( figs f ?i/les4 ,:atev] ( true or ( good is f\nd 9 human hi/ory has come f ,god4 ,on ! ,progressiv5ess ( ,revelation1 see ,orr1 ,problem ( ! ,o4 ,t41 #dca-dgh4 #f4 ,inspiration did n gu>antee in]rancy 9 ?+s n ess5tial to ! ma9 purpose ( ,scripture4 ,inspiration w5t no fur!r ?an to secure a tru/wor?y transmission by ! sacr$ writ]s ( ! tru? !y 7 commission$ to deliv]4 ,x 0 n omnisci5ce4 ,x 0 a be/[al ( v>i\s k9ds & degrees ( k & aid1 accord+ to ne$2 sometimes sugge/+ new tru?1 sometimes presid+ ov] ! collection ( prexi/+ mat]ial & gu>d+ f ess5tial error 9 ! f9al elaboration4 ,z inspiration 0 n omnisci5ce1 s x 0 n complete sanctification4 ,x involv$ nei!r p]sonal infallibility1 nor entire fre$om f s94 ,god c use imp]fect means4 ,z ! imp]fection ( ! eye does n disprove its div9e au?or%ip1 & z ,god reveals himself 9 nature & hi/ory 9 spite ( _! %ortcom+s1 s inspiration c accompli% its purpose ?r\gh bo? writ]s & writ+s 9 "s respects imp]fect4 ,god is1 9 ! ,bible z he 0 9 ,hebrew hi/ory1 lead+ 8 p onw>d to ,*ri/1 b only by a progressive unfold+ ( ! tru?4 ,! ,scripture writ]s 7 n p]fect m54 ,paul at ,antio* resi/$ ,pet]1 8because he /ood condemn$0 7,gal #b3aa74 ,b ,pet] diff]$ f ,paul1 n 9 public utt]ances1 nor 9 writt5 words1 b 9 foll[+ 8 own tea*+s 7cf4 ,acts #ae3f-aa72 v]sus ,norman ,fox1 9 ,bap4 ,rev41 #ahhe3dfi-dhb4 ,p]sonal defects d n invalidate an ambassador1 ?\gh !y may h9d] ! reception ( 8 message4 ,s ) ! apo/les' ignorance ( ! "t ( ,*ri/'s second com+4 ,x 0 only gradually t !y came to und]/& ,*ri/ian doctr9es2 !y did n tea* ! tru? all at once2 _! f9al utt]ances supplem5t$ & complet$ ! e>li]2 & all toge!r furni%$ only t measure ( k :i* ,god saw ne$ful = ! moral & religi\s tea*+ ( mank9d4 ,_m ?+s are yet unreveal$1 & _m ?+s :i* inspir$ m5 utt]$1 !y did n1 :5 !y utt]$ !m1 fully und]/&4 ,pfleid]]1 ,grundriss1 #ec1 #ed--8,! ^w is div9e-human 9 ! s5se t x has = its cont5ts div9e tru? 9 human1 hi/orical1 & individually condition$ =m4 ,! ,holy ,scripture conta9s ! ^w ( ,god 9 a way pla91 & entirely suffici5t to beget sav+ fai?40 ,frances ,p[] ,cobbe1 ,life1 #hg--8;,inspiration is n a miracul\s & !re=e incr$ible ?+1 b normal & 9 accordance ) ! natural relations ( ! inf9ite & f9ite _s1 a div9e infl[+ ( m5tal light precisely analog\s to t moral influ5ce :i* div9es call grace4 ,z e dev\t & ob$i5t s\l may expect to %>e 9 div9e grace1 s ! dev\t & ob$i5t s\ls ( all ! ages h %>$1 z ,p>k] taught1 9 div9e inspiration4 ,&1 z ! reception ( grace ev5 9 l>ge measure does n r5d] u impeccable1 s nei!r does ! reception ( inspiration r5d] u infallible40 ,we may conc$e to ,miss ,cobbe t inspiration consi/s ) imp]fection1 :ile yet we grant to ! ,scripture writ]s an au?ority high] ?an our own4 #g4 ,inspiration did n always1 or ev5 g5]ally1 involve a direct communication to ! ,scripture writ]s ( ! words !y wrote4 ,?\ght is possible )\t words1 & 9 ! ord] ( nature prec$es words4 ,! ,scripture writ]s appe> to h be5 s influ5c$ by ! ,holy ,_s t !y p]ceiv$ & felt ev5 ! new tru?s !y 7 to publi%1 z discov]ies ( _! own m9ds1 & 7 left to ! action ( _! own m9ds 9 ! expression ( ^! tru?s1 ) ! s+le exception t !y 7 sup]naturally held back f ! selection ( wrong words1 & :5 ne$ful 7 provid$ ) "r ones4 ,inspiration is !re=e n v]bal1 :ile yet we claim t no =m ( words :i* tak5 9 its connections w\ld tea* ess5tial error has be5 admitt$ into ,scripture4 ,be=e expression !re mu/ be some?+ to be express$4 ,?\ght is possible )\t language4 ,! concept may exi/ )\t words4 ,see exp]i5ces ( deaf-mutes1 9 ,pr9ceton ,rev41 ,jan4 #ahha3ajd-abh4 ,! prompt] int]rupts only :5 ! speak]'s memory fails4 ,! writ+-ma/] guides ! pupil's h& only :5 x w\ld o!rwise g wrong4 ,! fa!r suff]s ! *ild to walk alone1 except :5 x is 9 dang] ( /umbl+4 ,if k be r5d]$ c]ta91 x is z good z direct revelation4 ,b :5ev] ! m]e communication ( ideas or ! direction to prop] mat]ial w\ld n suffice to secure a correct utt]ance1 ! sacr$ writ]s 7 guid$ 9 ! v selection ( _! words4 ,m9ute criticism proves m & m conclusively ! suitabl5ess ( ! v]bal dress to ! ?\ghts express$2 all ,biblical exegesis is bas$1 inde$1 ^u ! assumption t div9e wisdom has made ! outw>d =m a tru/wor?y vehicle ( ! inw>d sub/ance ( revelation4 ,see ,h5d]son1 ,inspiration 7#bnd ed471 #ajb1 #aad2 ,bib4 ,sac1 #ahgb3dbh1 #fdj2 ,william ,james1 ,psy*ology1 #a3bff sq4 ,watts1 ,new ,apologetic1 #dj1 #aaa1 holds to a v]bal inspiration3 8,! bottles are n ! w9e1 b if ! bottles p]i% ! w9e is sure to be spill$02 ! inspir+ ,_s c]ta9ly gave language to ,pet] & o!rs at ,p5teco/1 = ! apo/les spoke ) o!r tongues2 holy m5 ( old n only ?\ght1 b 8spake f ,god1 be+ mov$ by ! ,holy ,_s0 7#b ,pet4 #a3ba74 ,s ,gordon1 ,m9i/ry ( ! ,_s1 #aga--8,:y ! m9ute /udy ( ! words ( ,scripture1 c>ri$ on by all expositors1 _! se>* aft] ! precise %ade ( v]bal significance1 _! att5tion to ! m9ute/ details ( language1 & to all ! delicate color+ ( mood & t5se & acc5t80 ,lib]al s*ol>s1 ,dr4 ,gordon ?9ks1 ?us affirm ! v doctr9e :i* !y d5y4 ,ro!1 ,dogmatics1 #bch1 speaks ( 8a language ( ! ,holy ,gho/40 ,oet+]3 8,x is ! /yle ( ! heav5ly c\rt40 ,b ,broadus1 an almo/ equally cons]vative s*ol>1 9 8 ,com4 on ,mat4 #c3ag1 says t ! diff]5ce betwe5 8,?is is my belov$ ,son10 & ,luke #c3bb--8,?\ art my belov$ ,son10 %\ld make u cauti\s 9 !oriz+ ab\t v]bal inspiration1 & he intimates t 9 "s cases t hypo!sis is unw>rant$4 ,! !ory ( v]bal inspiration is refut$ by ! two facts3 #a4 t ! ,n4 ,t4 quotations f ! ,o4 ,t41 9 #ii cases1 diff] bo? f ! ,hebrew & f ! ,,lxx2 #b4 t ,jesus' own words are report$ ) v>iations by ! diff]5t evangeli/s2 see ,m>cus ,dods1 ,! ,bible1 its ,orig9 & ,nature1 *apt] on ,inspiration4 ,hel5 ,kell] told ,phillips ,brooks t %e _h always kn[n t !re 0 a ,god1 b %e _h n kn[n 8 "n4 ,dr4 ,z4 ,f4 ,we/]velt1 ( ! ,deaf ,mute ,in/itute1 _h "u 8 *>ge f\r *ildr5 ( diff]5t mo!rs4 ,all ( ^! *ildr5 7 dumb1 ?\gh !re 0 no defect ( he>+ & ! organs ( spee* 7 p]fect4 ,b _! mo!rs _h nev] lov$ !m & _h nev] talk$ to !m 9 ! lov+ way t provok$ imitation4 ,! *ildr5 he>d scold+ & h>%ness1 b ?is did n attract4 ,s ! old] memb]s ( ! *ur* 9 private & 9 ! meet+s = pray] %\ld tea* ! y\ng] to talk4 ,b h>% & cont5ti\s talk w n accompli% ! result1--x mu/ be ! talk ( ,*ri/ian love4 ,william ,d4 ,:itney1 9 8 review ( ,max ,mll]'s ,sci5ce ( ,language1 #bf-ca1 combats ! view ( ,mll] t ?\ght & language are id5tical4 ,major ,bliss ,taylor's reply to ,santa ,anna3 8,g5]al ,taylor nev] surr5d]s60 0 a sub/antially correct1 ?\gh a diplomatic & euphemi/ic1 v]sion ( ! ,g5]al's actual pr(ane words4 ,ea* ,scripture writ] utt]$ old tru? 9 ! new =ms ) :i* 8 own exp]i5ce _h clo!d x4 ,david rea*$ 8 greatness by leav+ (f ! m]e repetition ( ,moses1 & by speak+ out ( 8 own he>t4 ,paul rea*$ 8 greatness by giv+ up ! m]e tea*+ ( :at he _h be5 taught1 & by tell+ :at ,god's plan ( m]cy 0 to all4 ,augu/9e3 8,scriptura e/ s5sus ,scriptur0--8,scripture is :at ,scripture means40 ,among ! !ological writ]s :o admit ! errancy ( ,scripture writ]s z to "s matt]s uness5tial to _! moral & spiritual tea*+1 are ,lu!r1 ,calv91 ,cocceius1 ,?oluck1 ,ne&]1 ,lange1 ,/i]1 ,van ,oo/]zee1 ,john ,h[e1 ,ri*>d ,baxt]1 ,conybe>e1 ,al=d1 ,mead4 #h4 ,yet1 not)/&+ ! ev]-pres5t human elem5t1 ! all-p]vad+ inspiration ( ! ,scriptures con/itutes ^! v>i\s writ+s an organic :ole4 ,s9ce ! ,bible is 9 all its p>ts ! "w ( ,god1 ea* "p is to be judg$1 n by itself alone1 b 9 its connection ) e o!r "p4 ,! ,scriptures are n to be int]pret$ z s _m m]ely human productions by diff]5t au?ors1 b z also ! "w ( "o div9e m9d4 ,seem+ly trivial ?+s are to be expla9$ f _! connection ) ! :ole4 ,"o hi/ory is to be built up f ! sev]al acc\nts ( ! life ( ,*ri/4 ,"o doctr9e mu/ supplem5t ano!r4 ,! ,old ,te/am5t is "p ( a progressive sy/em1 ^: culm9ation & key are to be f\nd 9 ! ,new4 ,! c5tral subject & ?\ght :i* b9ds all p>ts ( ! ,bible toge!r1 & 9 ! light ( :i* !y are to be int]pret$1 is ! p]son & "w ( ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,! ,bible says3 8,!re is no ,god0 7,ps4 #ad3a72 b !n1 ?is is to be tak5 ) ! context3 8,! fool ha? said 9 8 he>t40 ,satan's 8x is writt510 7,mat4 #d3f7 is supplem5t$ by ,*ri/'s 8,x is writt5 aga90 7,mat4 #d3g74 ,trivialities are l ! hair & nails ( ! body--!y h _! place z p>ts ( a complete & organic :ole2 see ,ebr>d1 ,dogmatik1 #a3dj4 ,! v]se :i* m5tions ,paul's cloak at ,troas 7#b ,tim4 #d3ac7 is 7#a7 a sign ( g5u95ess--a =g] w\ld n inv5t x2 7#b7 an evid5ce ( temporal ne$ endur$ = ! gospel2 7#c7 an indication ( ! limits ( inspiration1--ev5 ,paul mu/ h books & p>*m5ts4 ,col4 #b3ba--8;,h&le n1 nor ta/e1 nor t\*0--is to be int]pret$ by ! context 9 v]se #bj--8:y 444 d ye subject y\rselves to ord9ances80 & by v]se #bb--8;aft] ! precepts & doctr9es ( m540 ,hodge1 ,sy/4 ,!ol41 #a3afd--8,! diff]5ce betwe5 ,john's gospel & ! book ( ,*ronicles is l t betwe5 man's bra9 & ! hair ( 8 head2 nev]!less ! life ( ! body is z truly 9 ! hair z 9 ! bra940 ,l railway c\pons1 ,scripture texts are 8,n good if deta*$40 ,crook]1 ,! ,new ,bible & its ,new ,uses1 #acg-add1 utt]ly d5ies ! unity ( ! ,bible4 ,pr(4 ,a4 ,b4 ,davidson ( ,ed9burgh says t 8,a !ology ( ! ,o4 ,t4 is really an impossibility1 because ! ,o4 ,t4 is n a homog5e\s :ole40 ,^! d5ials proce$ f an insuffici5t recognition ( ! pr9ciple ( evolution 9 ,o4 ,t4 hi/ory & doctr9e4 ,doctr9es 9 e>ly ,scripture are l riv]s at _! s\rce2 !y are n yet fully exp&$2 _m afflu5ts are yet to come4 ,see ,bp4 ,bull's ,s]mon1 9 ,works1 xv3#ahc2 & ,bruce1 ,apologetics1 #cbc--8,! lit]ature ( ! e>ly /ages ( revelation mu/ %>e ! defects ( ! revelation :i* x records & int]prets4444 ,! f9al revelation enables u to see ! defects ( ! e>li]4444 ,we %\ld f9d ,*ri/ 9 ! ,o4 ,t4 z we f9d ! butt]fly 9 ! cat]pill>1 & man ! cr[n ( ! univ]se 9 ! fi]y cl\d40 ,crane1 ,religion ( ,to-morr[1 #bbd--;,e "p is to be modifi$ by e o!r "p4 ,no v]se is true out ( ! ,book1 b ! :ole ,book tak5 toge!r is true4 ,gore1 9 ,lux ,mundi1 #cej--8,to recognize ! inspiration ( ! ,scriptures is to put ourselves to s*ool 9 e "p ( !m40 ,rob]t ,br[n+1 ,r+ & ,book1 #age 7,pope1 #bbh7--8,tru? n[h]e lies1 yet ev]y:]e1 9 ^!2 ,n absolutely 9 a portion1 yet ,evolvable f ! :ole2 evolv$ at la/ ,pa9fully1 held t5aci\sly by me40 ,on ! ,organic ,unity ( ! ,o4 ,t41 see ,orr1 ,problem ( ! ,o4 ,t41 #bg-ea4 #i4 ,:5 ! unity ( ! ,scripture is fully recogniz$1 ! ,bible1 9 spite ( imp]fections 9 matt]s non-ess5tial to its religi\s purpose1 furni%es a safe & suffici5t guide to tru? & to salvation4 ,! recognition ( ! ,holy ,_s's ag5cy makes x rational & natural to believe 9 ! organic unity ( ,scripture4 ,:5 ! e>li] p>ts are tak5 9 connection ) ! lat]1 & :5 ea* "p is int]pret$ by ! :ole1 mo/ ( ! difficulties connect$ ) inspiration disappe>4 ,tak5 toge!r1 ) ,*ri/ z its culm9ation & explanation1 ! ,bible furni%es ! ,*ri/ian rule ( fai? & practice4 ,! ,bible answ]s two que/ions3 ,:at has ,god done to save me8 & ,:at mu/ ,i d to be sav$8 ,! propositions ( ,euclid are n invalidat$ by ! fact t he believ$ ! e>? to be flat4 ,! e?ics ( ,plato w\ld n be disprov$ by 8 mi/akes ) reg>d to ! sol> sy/em4 ,s religi\s au?ority is indep5d5t ( m]ely secul> k4--,sir ,jo%ua ,reynolds 0 a great pa9t]1 & a great tea*] ( 8 art4 ,8 lectures on pa9t+ laid d[n pr9ciples :i* h be5 accept$ z au?ority = g5]ations4 ,b ,jo%ua ,reynolds illu/rates 8 subject f hi/ory & sci5ce4 ,x 0 a day :5 bo? hi/ory & sci5ce 7 "y4 ,9 "s unimportant matt]s ( ?is sort1 :i* d n 9 ! lea/ affect 8 conclusions1 ,sir ,jo%ua ,reynolds makes an occasional slip2 8 /atem5ts are inaccurate4 ,does he1 !re=e1 cease to be an au?ority 9 matt]s ( 8 art8--,! ,duke ( ,well+ton said once t no human be+ knew at :at "t ( day ! battle ( ,wat]loo began4 ,"o hi/orian gets 8 /ory f "o combatant1 & he puts ! h\r at elev5 9 ! morn+4 ,ano!r hi/orian gets 8 in=mation f ano!r combatant1 & he puts x at noon4 ,%all we say t ?is discrepancy argues error 9 ! :ole acc\nt1 & t we h no long] any c]ta9ty t ! battle ( ,wat]loo 0 ev] f\ght at all8 ,su* slight imp]fections are to be freely admitt$1 :ile at ! same "t we insi/ t ! ,bible1 tak5 z a :ole1 is incomp>ably sup]ior to all o!r books1 & is 8able to make !e wise unto salvation0 7#b ,tim4 #c3ae74 ,hook]1 ,eccl4 ,polity3 8,:atsoev] is spok5 ( ,god or ?+s p]ta9+ to ,god o!rwise ?an tru? is1 ?\gh x seem an honor1 x is an injury4 ,& z incr$ible praises giv5 unto m5 d (t5 abate & impair ! cr$it ( _! des]v$ comm5dation1 s we mu/ likewise take great he$ le/1 9 attribut+ to ,scripture m ?an x c h1 ! incr$ibility ( t d cause ev5 ^? ?+s :i* x ha? m abundantly to be less rev]5tly e/eem$40 ,baxt]1 ,works1 #ba3cdi--8,^? m5 :o ?9k t ^! human imp]fections ( ! writ]s d ext5d fur!r1 & may appe> 9 "s passages ( *ronologies or hi/ory :i* are no "p ( ! rule ( fai? & life1 d n h]eby de/roy ! ,*ri/ian cause4 ,= ,god might enable 8 apo/les to an infallible record+ & prea*+ ( ! gospel1 ev5 all ?+s necess>y to salvation1 ?\gh he _h n made !m infallible 9 e by-passage & circum/ance1 any m ?an !y 7 indefectible 9 life40 ,! ,bible1 says ,beet1 8conta9s possible errors 9 small details or allusions1 b x gives u ) absolute c]ta9ty ! great facts ( ,*ri/ianity1 & ^u ^! great facts1 & ^u ^! only1 our fai? is bas$40 ,evans1 ,bib4 ,s*ol>%ip & ,inspiration1 #ae1 #ah1 #fe--8,tea* t ! %ell is "p ( ! k]nel & m5 :o f9d t !y _c keep ! %ell w ?r[ away %ell & k]nel toge!r4444 ,?is ov]/atem5t ( inspiration made ,r5an1 ,bradlaugh & ,+]soll sceptics4444 ,if 9 creation ,god c "w out a p]fect result ?r\gh imp]fection :y _c he d ! l 9 inspiration8 ,if 9 ,*ri/ ,god c appe> 9 human weakness & ignorance1 :y n 9 ! writt5 ^w80 ,we !re=e take exception to ! view ( ,watts1 ,new ,apologetic1 #ga--8,let ! !ory ( hi/orical errors & sci5tific errors be adopt$1 & ,*ri/ianity mu/ %>e ! fate ( ,h9duism4 ,if its inspir$ writ]s err :5 !y tell u ( e>?ly ?+s1 none w believe :5 !y tell ( heav5ly ?+s40 ,watts adduces in/ances ( ,sp9oza's giv+ up ! =m :ile claim+ to hold ! sub/ance1 & 9 ?is way r$uc+ revelation to a ph5om5on ( naturali/ic pan!ism4 ,we reply t no a priori !ory ( p]fection 9 div9e inspiration mu/ bl9d u to ! evid5ce ( actual imp]fection 9 ,scripture4 ,z 9 creation & 9 ,*ri/1 s 9 ,scripture1 ,god humbles himself to adopt human & imp]fect me?ods ( self-revelation4 ,see ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 ,di>y3 8,i obs]ve t old m5 seldom h any advantage ( new discov]ies1 because !y are beside ! way to :i* !y h be5 s long us$4 ,resolv$1 if ev] ,i live to ye>s1 t ,i w be imp>tial to he> ! reasons ( all pret5d$ discov]ies1 & receive !m if rational1 h[ev] long soev] ,i h be5 us$ to ano!r way ( ?9k+40 ,b[ne1 ,! ,imman5ce ( ,god1 #aji1 #aaj--8,^? :o w\ld f9d ! s\rce ( c]ta9ty & ! seat ( au?ority 9 ! ,scriptures alone1 or 9 ! *ur* alone1 or reason & consci5ce alone1 r ?an 9 ! complex & indivisible c[ork+ ( all ^! factors1 %\ld be rem9d$ ( ! hi/ory ( religi\s ?\ght4 ,! /iffe/ doctr9e ( ,scripture in]rancy has n prev5t$ w>r+ int]pretations2 & ^? :o w\ld place ! seat ( au?ority 9 reason & consci5ce are =c$ to admit t outside illum9ation may d mu* = bo?4 ,9 "s s5se ! religion ( ! _s is a v important fact1 b :5 x sets up 9 opposition to ! religion ( a book1 ! light t is 9 x is apt to turn to d>kness40 #aj4 ,:ile inspiration con/itutes ,scripture an au?ority m tru/wor?y ?an are individual reason or ! cre$s ( ! *ur*1 ! only ultimate au?ority is ,*ri/ himself4 ,*ri/ has n s con/ruct$ ,scripture z to disp5se ) 8 p]sonal pres5ce & tea*+ by 8 ,_s4 ,! ,scripture is ! imp]fect mirror ( ,*ri/4 ,x is defective1 yet x reflects him & leads to him4 ,au?ority resides n 9 x1 b 9 him1 & 8 ,_s enables ! individual ,*ri/ian & ! collective *ur* progressively to di/+ui% ! ess5tial f ! non-ess5tial1 & s to p]ceive ! tru? z x is 9 ,jesus4 ,9 ?us judg+ ,scripture & int]pret+ ,scripture1 we are n rationali/s1 b are r believ]s 9 him :o promis$ to be ) u alway ev5 unto ! end ( ! _w & to lead u by 8 ,_s into all ! tru?4 ,james speaks ( ! law z a mirror 7,james #a3bc-be--8l unto a man behold+ 8 natural face 9 a mirror 444 looke? into ! p]fect law072 ! law convicts ( s9 because x reflects ,*ri/4 ,paul speaks ( ! gospel z a mirror 7#b ,cor4 #c3ah--8we all1 behold+ z 9 a mirror ! glory ( ! ,"l072 ! gospel trans=ms u because x reflects ,*ri/4 ,yet bo? law & gospel are imp]fect2 !y are l mirrors ( poli%$ metal1 ^: surface is (t5 dim1 & ^: images are obscure2 7#a ,cor4 #ac3ab--8;,= n[ we see 9 a mirror1 d>kly2 b !n face to face072 ev5 inspir$ m5 "k only 9 "p1 & prophesy only 9 "p4 ,scripture itself is ! conception & utt]ance ( a *ild1 to be done away :5 t :i* is p]fect is come1 & we see ,*ri/ z he is4 ,au?ority is ! "r to impose beliefs or to comm& ob$i5ce4 ,! only ultimate au?ority is ,god1 = he is tru?1 ju/ice & love4 ,b he c impose beliefs & comm& ob$i5ce only z he is kn[n4 ,au?ority belongs !re=e only to ,god reveal$1 & because ,*ri/ is ,god reveal$ he c say3 8,all au?ority ha? be5 giv5 unto me 9 heav5 & on e>?0 7,mat4 #bh3ah74 ,! f9al au?ority 9 religion is ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,e "o ( 8 revelations ( ,god is au?oritative4 ,bo? nature & human nature are su* revelations4 ,he ex]cises 8 au?ority ?r\gh delegat$ & subord9ate au?orities1 su* z p>5ts & civil gov]nm5t4 ,^! rightfully claim ob$i5ce s long z !y hold to _! own respective sph]es & recognize _! relation ( dep5d5ce ^u him4 8,! p[]s t be are orda9$ ( ,god0 7,rom4 #ac3a71 ev5 ?\gh !y are imp]fect manife/ations ( 8 wisdom & righte\sness4 ,! decisions ( ! ,supreme ,c\rt are au?oritative ev5 ?\gh ! judges are fallible & come %ort ( e/abli%+ absolute ju/ice4 ,au?ority is n infallibility1 9 ! gov]nm5t ei!r ( ! family or ( ! /ate4 ,! *ur* ( ! middle ages 0 reg>d$ z possess$ ( absolute au?ority4 ,b ! ,prote/ant ,re=mation %[$ h[ va9 7 ^! pret5sions4 ,! *ur* is an au?ority only z x recognizes & expresses ! supreme au?ority ( ,*ri/4 ,! ,re=m]s felt ! ne$ ( "s ext]nal au?ority 9 place ( ! *ur*4 ,!y sub/itut$ ! ,scripture4 ,! phrase 8! ^w ( ,god10 :i* designates ! tru? orally utt]$ or affect+ ! m9ds ( m51 came to signify only a book4 ,supreme au?ority 0 ascrib$ to x4 ,x (t5 usurp$ ! place ( ,*ri/4 ,:ile we v9dicate ! prop] au?ority ( ,scripture1 we w\ld %[ t its au?ority is n imm$iate & absolute1 b m$iate & relative1 ?r\gh human & imp]fect records1 & ne$+ a supplem5t>y & div9e tea*+ to int]pret !m4 ,! au?ority ( ,scripture is n ap>t f ,*ri/ or above ,*ri/1 b only 9 subord9ation to him & to 8 ,_s4 ,he :o inspir$ ,scripture mu/ enable u to int]pret ,scripture4 ,?is is n a doctr9e ( rationalism1 = x holds to man's absolute dep5d5ce ^u ! enlight5+ ,_s ( ,*ri/4 ,x is n a doctr9e ( my/icism1 = x holds t ,*ri/ tea*es u only by op5+ to u ! mean+ ( 8 pa/ revelations4 ,we d n expect any new worlds 9 our a/ronomy1 nor d we expect any new ,scriptures 9 our !ology4 ,b we d expect t ! same ,*ri/ :o gave ! ,scriptures w give u new insight into _! mean+ & w enable u to make new applications ( _! tea*+s4 ,! "r & duty ( private judgm5t ) reg>d to ,scripture belong to no ecclesia/ical ca/e1 b are inali5able lib]ties ( ! :ole *ur* ( ,*ri/ & ( ea* individual memb] ( t *ur*4 ,& yet ?is judgm5t is1 f ano!r po9t ( view1 no private judgm5t4 ,x is n ! judgm5t ( arbitr>9ess or caprice4 ,x does n make ! ,*ri/ian consci\sness supreme1 if we mean by ?is t]m ! consci\sness ( ,*ri/ians ap>t f ! indwell+ ,*ri/4 ,:5 once we come to ,*ri/1 he jo9s u to himself1 he seats u ) him ^u 8 ?rone1 he imp>ts to u 8 ,_s1 he bids u use our reason 9 8 s]vice4 ,9 judg+ ,scripture1 we make n ourselves b ,*ri/ supreme1 & recognize him z ! only ultimate & infallible au?ority 9 matt]s ( religion4 ,we c believe t ! total revelation ( ,*ri/ 9 ,scripture is an au?ority sup]ior to individual reason or to any s+le affirmation ( ! *ur*1 :ile yet we believe t ?is v au?ority ( ,scripture has its limitation1 & t ,*ri/ himself mu/ tea* u :at ?is total revelation is4 ,s ! judgm5t :i* ,scripture enc\rages u to pass ^u its own limitations only induces a f9al & m implicit reliance ^u ! liv+ & p]sonal ,son ( ,god4 ,he has nev] int5d$ t ,scripture %\ld be a sub/itute = 8 own pres5ce1 & x is only 8 ,_s t is promis$ to lead u into all ! tru?4 ,on ! au?ority ( ,scripture1 see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #aac-acf--8,! s\rce ( all au?ority is n ,scripture1 b ,*ri/4444 ,n[h]e are we told t ! ,scripture ( itself is able to conv9ce ! s9n] or to br+ him to ,god4 ,x is a glitt]+ sword1 b x is #8! sword ( ! ,_s' 7,eph4 #f3ag72 & unless ! ,_s use x1 x w nev] pi]ce ! he>t4 ,x is a heavy hamm]1 b only ! ,_s c wield x s t x breaks 9 pieces ! fl9ty rock4 ,x is ! type lock$ 9 ! =m1 b ! pap] w nev] receive an impression until ! ,_s %all apply ! p[]4 ,no m]e in/rum5t %all h ! glory t belongs to ,god4 ,e s\l %all feel its entire dep5d5ce ^u him4 ,only ! ,holy ,_s c turn ! out] ^w into an inn] ^w4 ,& ! ,holy ,_s is ! ,_s ( ,*ri/4 ,*ri/ comes into direct contact ) ! s\l4 ,he himself gives 8 witness to ! tru?4 ,he be>s te/imony to ,scripture1 ev5 m ?an ,scripture be>s te/imony to him40 #aa4 ,! prec$+ discussion enables u at lea/ to lay d[n ?ree c>d9al pr9ciples & to answ] ?ree common que/ions ) reg>d to inspiration4 ,pr9ciples3 7a7 ,! human m9d c be inhabit$ & en]giz$ by ,god :ile yet atta9+ & reta9+ its own highe/ intellig5ce & fre$om4 7b7 ,! ,scriptures be+ ! "w ( ! "o ,god1 z well z ( ! m5 9 :om ,god mov$ & dwelt1 con/itute an articulat$ & organic unity4 7c7 ,! unity & au?ority ( ,scripture z a :ole are entirely consi/5t ) its gradual evolution & ) great imp]fection 9 its non-ess5tial p>ts4 ,que/ions3 7a7 ,is any "p ( ,scripture un9spir$8 ,answ]3 ,e "p ( ,scripture is inspir$ 9 its connection & relation ) e o!r "p4 7b7 ,are !re degrees ( inspiration8 ,answ]3 ,!re are degrees ( value1 b n ( inspiration4 ,ea* "p 9 its connection ) ! re/ is made completely true1 & complet5ess has no degrees4 7c7 ,h[ may we "k :at p>ts are ( mo/ value & :at is ! tea*+ ( ! :ole8 ,answ]3 ,! same ,_s ( ,*ri/ :o inspir$ ! ,bible is promis$ to take ( ! ?+s ( ,*ri/1 &1 by %[+ !m to u1 to lead u progressively into all ! tru?4 ,notice ! value ( ! ,old ,te/am5t1 reveal+ z x does ! natural attributes ( ,god1 z a basis & backgr\nd = ! revelation ( m]cy 9 ! ,new ,te/am5t4 ,revelation 0 9 _m p>ts 7--,heb4 #a3a7 z well z 9 _m ways4 8,ea* individual oracle1 tak5 by itself1 0 p>tial & incomplete0 7,rob]tson ,smi?1 ,o4 ,t4 9 ,jewi% ,*41 #ba74 ,b ! p]son & ! words ( ,*ri/ sum up & complete ! revelation1 s t1 tak5 toge!r & 9 _! connection ) him1 ! v>i\s p>ts ( ,scripture con/itute an infallible & suffici5t rule ( fai? & practice4 ,see ,br[ne1 ,inspiration ( ! ,n4 ,t42 ,b]n>d1 ,progress ( ,doctr9e 9 ! ,n4 ,t42 ,/anley ,lea!s1 ,/ructure ( ! ,o4 ,t42 ,ra9y1 ,deliv]y & ,developm5t ( ,doctr9e4 ,see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 on ,me?od ( ,inspiration1 9 ,philosophy & ,religion1 #adh-aee4 ,! div9e influ5ce ^u ! m9ds ( po/-biblical writ]s1 lead+ to ! composition ( su* allegories z ,pilgrim's ,progress1 & su* dramas z ,macbe?1 is to be d5om9at$ illum9ation r ?an inspiration1 = ! reasons t ^! writ+s conta9 error z well z tru? 9 matt]s ( religion & morals2 t !y add no?+ ess5tial to :at ! ,scriptures give u2 & t1 ev5 9 _! expression ( tru? previ\sly made kn[n1 !y are n wor?y ( a place 9 ! sacr$ canon4 ,w4 ,h4 ,p4 ,faunce3 8,h[ f> is ,bunyan's ,pilgrim's ,progress true to pres5t ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce8 ,x is untrue3 #a4 ,9 its despair ( ?is _w4 ,! ,pilgrim has to leave ?is _w 9 ord] to be sav$4 ,mod]n exp]i5ce longs to d ,god's w "h1 & to save o!rs in/ead ( =sak+ !m4 #b4 ,9 its agony ov] s9 & frightful conflict4 ,bunyan illu/rates mod]n exp]i5ce bett] by ,*ri/iana & h] *ildr5 :o g ?r\gh ! ,valley & ! ,%ad[ ( ,dea? 9 ! daytime1 & )\t conflict ) ,apollyon4 #c4 ,9 ! con/ant unc]ta9ty ( ! issue ( ! ,pilgrim's fight4 ,*ri/ian ent]s ,d\bt+ ,ca/le & meets ,giant ,despair1 ev5 aft] he has won mo/ ( 8 victories4 ,9 mod]n exp]i5ce1 #8at ev5+ "t !re %all be light'--7,ze*4 #ad3g74 #d4 ,9 ! con/ant conviction ( an abs5t ,*ri/4 ,bunyan's ,*ri/ is nev] met ?is side ( ! ,cele/ial ,city4 ,! ,cross at :i* ! burd5 dropp$ is ! symbol ( a sacrificial act1 b x is n ! ,savior himself4 ,mod]n exp]i5ce has ,*ri/ liv+ 9 u & ) u alway1 & n simply a ,*ri/ :om we hope to see at ! end ( ! j\rney40 ,beys*lag1 ,n4 ,t4 ,!ol41 #b3ah--8,paul decl>es 8 own prophecy & inspiration to be ess5tially imp]fect 7#a ,cor4 #ac3i1 #aj1 #ab2 cf4 #a ,cor4 #ab3aj2 #a ,!ss4 #e3ai-ba74 ,?is admission ju/ifies a ,*ri/ian criticism ev5 ( 8 views4 ,he c pron\nce an ana!ma on ^? :o prea* #8a diff]5t gospel' 7,gal4 #a3h1 #i71 = :at belongs to simple fai?1 ! facts ( salvation1 are absolutely c]ta94 ,b :]e prophetic ?\ght & spee* g beyond ^! facts ( salvation1 wood & /raw may be m+l$ ) ! gold1 silv] & preci\s /ones built ^u ! "o f\ndation4 ,s he di/+ui%es 8 own mode/ f ! 7#a ,cor4 #g3be1 #dj740 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #dd--8,! au?ority ( ,scripture is n "o t b9ds1 b "o t sets free4 ,paul is writ+ ( ,scripture :5 he says3 #8,n t we h lord%ip ov] y\r fai?1 b are help]s ( y\r joy3 = 9 fai? ye /& fa/' 7#b ,cor4 #a3bd740 ,crem]1 9 ,h]zog1 ,real5cyc41 #ahc-bjc--8,! *ur* doctr9e is t ! ,scriptures are inspir$1 b x has nev] be5 det]m9$ by ! *ur* h[ !y are inspir$40 ,butl]1 ,analogy1 "p ,,ii1 *ap4 ,,iii--8,! only "q conc]n+ ! tru? ( ,*ri/ianity is1 :e!r x be a real revelation1 n :e!r x be att5d$ ) e circum/ance :i* we %\ld h look$ =2 & conc]n+ ! au?ority ( ,scripture1 :e!r x be :at x claims to be1 n :e!r x be a book ( su* sort1 & s promulgat$1 z weak m5 are apt to fancy a book conta9+ a div9e revelation %\ld4 ,& !re=e1 nei!r obscurity1 nor seem+ inaccuracy ( /yle1 nor v>i\s read+s1 nor e>ly disputes ab\t ! au?ors ( p>ticul> p>ts1 nor any o!r ?+s ( ! l k9d1 ?\gh !y _h be5 mu* m consid]able ?an !y are1 c\ld ov]?r[ ! au?ority ( ! ,scripture2 unless ! prophets1 apo/les1 or our ,"l _h promis$ t ! book conta9+ ! div9e revelation %\ld be secure f ^! ?+s40 ,w4 ,rob]tson ,smi?3 8,if am ask$ :y ,i receive ! ,scriptures z ! ^w ( ,god & z ! only p]fect rule ( fai? & life1 ,i answ] ) all ! ,fa!rs ( ! ,prote/ant *ur*3 #8,because ! ,bible is ! only record ( ! r$eem+ love ( ,god2 because 9 ! ,bible alone ,i f9d ,god draw+ nigh to m5 9 ,jesus ,*ri/1 & decl>+ 8 w = our salvation4 ,& ! record ,i "k to be true by ! witness ( 8 ,_s 9 my he>t1 :]eby ,i am assur$ t none o!r ?an ,god himself is able to speak su* words to my s\l4' 0 ,! gospel ( ,jesus ,*ri/ is ! ( ! ,almighty4 ,see ,m>cus ,dods1 ,! ,bible1 its ,orig9 & ,nature2 ,b[ne1 ,! ,imman5ce ( ,god1 #ff-aae4 ,v4 ,objections to ! ,doctr9e ( ,inspiration4 ,9 connection ) a div9e-human "w l ! ,bible1 insoluble difficulties may be expect$ to pres5t !mselves4 ,s long1 h[ev]1 z its inspiration is su/a9$ by compet5t & suffici5t evid5ce1 ^! difficulties _c ju/ly prev5t our full acceptance ( ! doctr9e1 any m ?an disord] & my/]y 9 nature w>rant u 9 sett+ aside ! pro(s ( its div9e au?or%ip4 ,^! difficulties are less5$ ) "t2 "s h already disappe>$2 _m may be due to ignorance1 & may be remov$ h]eaft]2 ^? :i* are p]man5t may be int5d$ to /imulate inquiry & to discipl9e fai?4 ,x is noticeable t ! common objections to inspiration are urg$1 n s mu* aga9/ ! religi\s tea*+ ( ! ,scriptures1 z aga9/ c]ta9 errors 9 secul> matt]s :i* are suppos$ to be int]wov5 ) x4 ,b if ^! are prov$ to be errors inde$1 x w n necess>ily ov]?r[ ! doctr9e ( inspiration2 x w only compel u to give a l>g] place to ! human elem5t 9 ! composition ( ! ,scriptures1 & to reg>d !m m exclusively z a text-book ( religion4 ,z a rule ( religi\s fai? & practice1 !y w /ill be ! infallible ^w ( ,god4 ,! ,bible is to be judg$ z a book ^: "o aim is man's rescue f s9 & reconciliation to ,god1 & 9 ^! respects x w /ill be f\nd a record ( sub/antial tru?4 ,?is w appe> m fully z we exam9e ! objections "o by "o4 8,! ,scriptures are giv5 to tea* u1 n h[ ! heav5s g1 b h[ to g to heav540 ,_! aim is c]ta9ly n to tea* sci5ce or hi/ory1 except s f> z sci5ce or hi/ory is ess5tial to _! moral & religi\s purpose4 ,c]ta9 ( _! doctr9es1 l ! virg9-bir? ( ,*ri/ & 8 bodily resurrection1 are hi/orical facts1 & c]ta9 facts1 l t ( creation1 are also doctr9es4 ,) reg>d to ^! great facts1 we claim t inspiration has giv5 u acc\nts t are ess5tially tru/wor?y1 :atev] may be _! imp]fections 9 detail4 ,to und]m9e ! sci5tific tru/wor?9ess ( ! ,indian ,v$as is to und]m9e ! religion :i* !y tea*4 ,b ?is only because _! sci5tific doctr9e is an ess5tial "p ( _! religi\s tea*+4 ,9 ! ,bible1 religion is n dep5d5t ^u physical sci5ce4 ,! ,scriptures aim only to decl>e ! creator%ip & lord%ip ( ! p]sonal ,god4 ,! me?od ( 8 work+ may be describ$ pictorially )\t affect+ ?is sub/antial tru?4 ,! ,indian cosmogonies1 on ! o!r h&1 poly!i/ic or pan!i/ic z !y are1 tea* ess5tial untru?1 by describ+ ! orig9 ( ?+s z due to a s]ies ( s5seless trans=mations )\t basis ( w or wisdom4 ,s long z ! difficulties ( ,scripture are difficulties ( =m r ?an sub/ance1 ( its incid5tal features r ?an its ma9 doctr9e1 we may say ( its obscurities z ,isocrates said ( ! "w ( ,h]aclitus3 8,:at ,i und]/& ( x is s excell5t t ,i c draw conclusions f x conc]n+ :at ,i d n und]/&40 8,if ,b5gel f9ds ?+s 9 ! ,bible too h>d = 8 critical faculty1 he f9ds no?+ too h>d = 8 believ+ faculty40 ,) ,john ,smy?1 :o di$ at ,am/]dam 9 #afab1 we may say3 8,i pr(ess ,i h *ang$1 & %all be ready /ill to *ange1 = ! bett]02 & ) ,john ,rob9son1 9 8 f>ewell address to ! ,pilgrim ,fa!rs3 8,i am v]ily p]suad$ t ! ,"l ha? m tru? yet to break =? f 8 holy ^w40 ,see ,lu?>dt1 ,sav+ ,tru?s1 #bje2 ,philippi1 ,glaub5slehre1 #bje sq42 ,bap4 ,rev41 ,april1 #ahha3 art4 by ,o4 ,p4 ,ea*es2 ,c>d9al ,newman1 9 #ai? ,c5tury1 ,feb4 #ahhd4 #a4 ,errors 9 matt]s ( ,sci5ce4 ,^u ?is objection we rem>k3 7a7 ,we d n admit ! exi/5ce ( sci5tific error 9 ! ,scripture4 ,:at is *>g$ z su* is simply tru? pres5t$ 9 popul> & impressive =ms4 ,! common m9d receives a m correct idea ( unfamili> facts :5 ^! are n>rat$ 9 ph5om5al language & 9 summ>y =m ?an :5 !y are describ$ 9 ! ab/ract t]ms & 9 ! exact detail ( sci5ce4 ,! ,scripture writ]s unconsci\sly obs]ve ,h]b]t ,sp5c]'s pr9ciple ( /yle3 ,economy ( ! read]'s or he>]'s att5tion1--! m en]gy is exp5d$ ^u ! =m ! less !re rema9s to grapple ) ! sub/ance 7,essays1 #a-dg74 ,w5dt1 ,tea*+ ( ,jesus1 #a3acj1 br+s out ! pr9ciple ( ,jesus' /yle3 8,! greate/ cle>ness 9 ! smalle/ compass40 ,h5ce ,scripture uses ! phrases ( common life r ?an sci5tific t]m9ology4 ,?us ! language ( appe>ance is probably us$ 9 ,g54 #g3ai--8;all ! high m\nta9s t 7 "u ! :ole heav5 7 cov]$0--su* w\ld be ! appe>ance1 ev5 if ! deluge 7 local in/ead ( univ]sal2 9 ,jo%4 #aj3ab1 #ac--8;& ! sun /ood /ill0--su* w\ld be ! appe>ance1 ev5 if ! sun's rays 7 m]ely refract$ s z pret]naturally to l5g!n ! day2 9 ,ps4 #ic3a--8,! _w also is e/abli%$1 t x _c be mov$0--su* is ! appe>ance1 ev5 ?\gh ! e>? turns on its axis & moves r\nd ! sun4 ,9 n>rative1 to sub/itute = 8sunset0 "s sci5tific description w\ld div]t att5tion f ! ma9 subject4 ,w\ld x be pref]able1 9 ! ,o4 ,t41 if we %\ld read3 8,:5 ! revolution ( ! e>? ^u its axis caus$ ! rays ( ! sol> lum9>y to imp+e horizontally ^u ! ret9a1 ,isaac w5t out to m$itate0 7,g54 #bd3fc78 8,le secret d'ennuy] e/ de t\t dire40 ,*>les ,dick5s1 9 8 ,am]ican ,notes1 #gb1 describes a prairie sunset3 8,! decl9e ( day "h 0 v gorge\s1 t++ ! firmam5t deeply ) r$ & gold1 up to ! v key/one ( ! ar* above u0 7quot$ by ,hovey1 ,manual ( ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #ig74 ,did ,dick5s !re=e believe ! firmam5t to be a piece ( solid masonry8 ,canon ,driv] rejects ! ,bible /ory ( creation because ! di/9ctions made by mod]n sci5ce _c be f\nd 9 ! primitive ,hebrew4 ,he ?9ks ! fluid /ate ( ! e>?'s sub/ance %\ld h be5 call$ 8surg+ *aos10 in/ead ( 8wat]s0 7,g54 #a3b74 8,an admirable phrase = mod]n & cultivat$ m9ds10 replies ,mr4 ,glad/one1 8b a phrase t w\ld h left ! pupils ( ! ,mosaic writ] 9 exactly ! condition out ( :i* x 0 8 purpose to br+ !m1 namely1 a /ate ( utt] ignorance & d>kness1 ) possibly a little ripple ( bewild]m5t to boot02 see ,sunday ,s*ool ,times1 ,april #bf1 #ahij4 ,! fallacy ( hold+ t ,scripture gives 9 detail all ! facts connect$ ) a hi/orical n>rative has l$ to _m curi\s argum5ts4 ,! ,gregorian ,cal5d> :i* makes ! ye> beg9 9 ,janu>y 0 oppos$ by repres5t+ t ,eve 0 tempt$ at ! outset by an apple1 :i* 0 possible only 9 case ! ye> began 9 ,septemb]2 see ,?ay]1 ,*ange ( ,attitude t[>ds ! ,bible1 #df4 7b7 ,x is n necess>y to a prop] view ( inspiration to suppose t ! human au?ors ( ,scripture _h 9 m9d ! prop] sci5tific int]pretation ( ! natural ev5ts !y record$4 ,x is en\gh t ?is 0 9 ! m9d ( ! inspir+ ,_s4 ,?r\gh ! comp>atively n>r[ conceptions & inadequate language ( ! ,scripture writ]s1 ! ,_s ( inspiration may h secur$ ! expression ( ! tru? 9 su* g]m9al =m z to be intelligible to ! times 9 :i* x 0 fir/ publi%$1 & yet capable ( indef9ite expansion z sci5ce %\ld advance4 ,9 ! m9iature picture ( creation 9 ! fir/ *apt] ( ,g5esis1 & 9 its p[] ( adju/+ itself to e advance ( sci5tific inve/igation1 we h a /rong pro( ( inspiration4 ,! ^w 8day0 9 ,g5esis #a is an in/ance ( ?is g5]al mode ( expression4 ,x w\ld be absurd to tea* e>ly races1 t deal only 9 small numb]s1 ab\t ! myriads ( ye>s ( creation4 ,! *ild's object-lesson1 ) its graphic summ>y1 conveys to 8 m9d m ( tru? ?an elaborate & exact /atem5t w\ld convey4 ,conant 7,g5esis #b3aj7 says ( ! description ( ,ed5 & its riv]s3 8,( c\rse ! au?or's object is n a m9ute topographical description1 b a g5]al & impressive conception z a :ole40 ,yet ! progress ( sci5ce only %[s t ^! acc\nts are n less b m true ?an 0 suppos$ by ^? :o fir/ receiv$ !m4 ,nei!r ! ,h9du ,%a/]s nor any hea!n cosmogony c be> su* comp>ison ) ! results ( sci5ce4 ,:y *ange our int]pretations ( ,scripture s (t58 ,answ]3 ,we d n assume to be orig9al tea*]s ( sci5ce1 b only to int]pret ,scripture ) ! new lights we h4 ,see ,dana1 ,manual ( ,geology1 #gda-gdf2 ,guyot1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahee3cbd2 ,dawson1 ,/ory ( ,e>? & ,man1 #cb4 ,?is conception ( e>ly ,scripture tea*+ z elem5t>y & suit$ to ! *ildhood ( ! race w\ld make x possible1 if ! facts s requir$1 to int]pret ! e>ly *apt]s ( ,g5esis z my?ical or leg5d>y4 ,god might condesc5d to 8,k9d]g>t5 =mulas40 ,goe! said t 8,we %\ld deal ) *ildr5 z ,god deals ) u3 we are happie/ "u ! influ5ce ( innoc5t delusions40 ,longfell[3 8,h[ beautiful is y\?6 h[ bright x gleams1 ,) its illusions1 aspirations1 dreams6 ,book ( beg9n+s1 /ory )\t end1 ,ea* maid a h]o9e1 & ea* man a fri5d60 ,we might hold ) ,goe! & ) ,longfell[1 if we only exclud$ f ,god's tea*+ all ess5tial error4 ,! n>ratives ( ,scripture might be address$ to ! imag9ation1 & s might take my?ical or leg5d>y =m1 :ile yet !y convey$ sub/antial tru? t c\ld 9 no o!r way be s well appreh5d$ by e>ly man2 see ,rob]t ,br[n+'s poem1 8,developm5t10 9 ,asol&o4 ,! ,koran1 on ! o!r h&1 leaves no room = imag9ation1 b fixes ! numb] ( ! />s & decl>es ! firmam5t to be solid4 ,h5ry ,drummond3 8,evolution has giv5 u a new ,bible4444 ,! ,bible is n a book :i* has be5 made1--x has gr[n40 ,bagehot tells u t 8,"o ( ! mo/ rem>kable ( ,fa!r ,newman's ,ox=d s]mons expla9s h[ sci5ce tea*es t ! e>? goes r\nd ! sun1 & h[ ,scripture tea*es t ! sun goes r\nd ! e>?2 & x ends by advis+ ! discreet believ] to accept bo?40 ,?is is m5tal bookkeep+ by d\ble entry2 see ,mack9to%1 9 ,am4 ,j\r4 ,!ology1 ,jan4 #ahii3da4 ,l5ormant1 9 ,contemp4 ,rev41 ,nov4 #ahgi--8,:ile ! tradition ( ! deluge holds s consid]able a place 9 ! leg5d>y memories ( all bran*es ( ! ,aryan race1 ! monum5ts & orig9al texts ( ,egypt1 ) _! _m cosmogonic speculations1 h n af=d$ any1 ev5 di/ant1 allusion to ?is cataclysm40 ,l5ormant "h wrongly assum$ t ! language ( ,scripture is sci5tific language4 ,if x is ! language ( appe>ance1 !n ! deluge may be a local & n a univ]sal cata/rophe4 ,g4 ,f4 ,wright1 ,ice ,age 9 ,nor? ,am]ica1 sugge/s t ! num]\s traditions ( ! deluge may h _h _! orig9 9 ! enorm\s floods ( ! rec$+ glaci]4 ,9 ,s\?-we/]n ,que5sl&1 ! /&>d gauge at ! ,meteorological ,(fice regi/]$ #aj-1 #bj1 #ce-1 #aj- in*es ( ra9fall1 9 all #gg- in*es1 9 f\r successive days4 7c7 ,x may be safely said t sci5ce has n yet %[n any fairly int]pret$ passage ( ,scripture to be untrue4 ,) reg>d to ! antiquity ( ! race1 we may say t ow+ to ! diff]5ces ( read+ betwe5 ! ,septuag9t & ! ,hebrew !re is room = d\bt :e!r ei!r ( ! receiv$ *ronologies has ! sanction ( inspiration4 ,al?\gh sci5ce has made probable ! exi/5ce ( man ^u ! e>? at a p]iod prec$+ ! dates assign$ 9 ^! *ronologies1 no /atem5t ( inspir$ ,scripture is !reby prov$ false4 ,u%]'s s*eme ( *ronology1 on ! basis ( ! ,hebrew1 puts ! creation #djjd ye>s be=e ,*ri/4 ,hales's1 on ! basis ( ! ,septuag9t1 puts x #edaa ,b4 ,c4 ,! ,fa!rs foll[$ ! ,,lxx4 ,b ! g5ealogies be=e & aft] ! flood may pres5t u only ) ! names ( 8lead+ & repres5tative m540 ,"s ( ^! names seem to /&1 n = individuals1 b = tribes1 e4 g43 ,g54 #aj3af--:]e ,canaan is said to h begott5 ! ,jebusite & ! ,amorite2 #bi--;,joktan begot ,ophir & ,havilah4 ,9 ,g54 #aj3f1 we read t ,mizraim belong$ to ! sons ( ,ham4 ,b ,mizraim is a dual1 co9$ to designate ! two p>ts1 ,upp] & ,l[] ,egypt4 ,h5ce a son ( ,ham c\ld n be> ! "n ( ,mizraim4 ,g54 #aj3ac reads3 8,& ,mizraim begat ,ludim40 ,b ,ludim is a plural =m4 ,! ^w signifies a :ole nation1 & 8begat0 is n employ$ 9 a lit]al s5se4 ,s 9 v]ses #ae1 #af3 8,canaan begat 444 ! ,jebusite10 a tribe2 ! ance/ors ( :i* w\ld h be5 call$ ,jebus4 ,abraham1 ,isaac & ,jacob1 h[ev]1 are names1 n ( tribes or nations1 b ( individuals2 see ,pr(4 ,edw>d ,knig1 ( ,bonn1 9 ,s4 ,s4 ,times1 ,dec4 #ad1 #aija4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,we may pretty safely g back to ! "t ( ,abraham1 b no fur!r40 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahii3djc--8,! li/s 9 ,g5esis may relate to families & n to individuals40 ,g4 ,f4 ,wright1 ,ant4 & ,orig9 ( ,human ,race1 lect4 ,,ii--8,:5 9 ,david's "t x is said t #8,%ebuel1 ! son ( ,g]%om1 ! son ( ,moses1 0 rul] ov] ! treasures' 7#a ,*ron4 #bc3af2 #bf3bd71 ,g]%om 0 ! imm$iate son ( ,moses1 b ,%ebuel 0 sep>at$ by _m g5]ations f ,g]%om4 ,s :5 ,se? is said to h begott5 ,eno% :5 he 0 #aje ye>s old 7,g54 #e3f71 x is1 accord+ to ,hebrew usage1 capable ( mean+ t ,eno% 0 desc5d$ f ! bran* ( ,se?'s l9e :i* set (f at ! #aje? ye>1 ) any numb] ( int]m$iate l9ks omitt$40 ,! appe>ance ( complet5ess 9 ! text may be due to alt]ation ( ! text 9 ! c\rse ( c5turies2 see ,bib4 ,com41 #a3cj4 ,9 ! phrase 8,jesus ,*ri/1 ! son ( ,david1 ! son ( ,abraham0 7,mat4 #a3a7 ?irty-eight to =ty g5]ations are omitt$4 ,x may be s 9 "s ( ! ,old ,te/am5t g5ealogies4 ,!re is room = a hundr$ ?\s& ye>s1 if necess>y 7,conant74 ,w4 ,h4 ,gre51 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,april1 #ahij3cjc1 & 9 ,indep5d5t1 ,june #ah1 #ahia--8,! ,scriptures furni% u ) no data = a *ronological computation prior to ! life ( ,abraham4 ,! ,mosaic records d n fix1 & 7 n int5d$ to fix1 ! precise date ( ! ,flood or ( ! ,creation4444 ,!y give a s]ies ( specim5 lives1 ) appropriate numb]s atta*$1 to %[ by select$ examples :at 0 ! orig9al t]m ( human life4 ,to make !m a complete & cont9u\s record1 & to d$uce f !m ! antiquity ( ! race1 is to put !m to a use !y 7 nev] int5d$ to s]ve40 ,comp>ison ) secul> hi/ory also %[s t no su* l5g? ( "t z #ajj1jjj ye>s = man's exi/5ce ^u e>? seems necess>y4 ,rawl9son1 9 ,j\r4 ,*ri/4 ,philosophy1 #ahhc3cci-cfd1 dates ! beg9n+ ( ! ,*aldean mon>*y at #bdjj ,b4 ,c4 ,l5ormant puts ! entrance ( ! ,sanskritic ,indians into ,h9du/an at #bejj ,b4 ,c4 ,! e>lie/ ,v$as are betwe5 #abjj & #ajjj ,b4 ,c4 7,max ,mll]74 ,call ( ,abraham1 probably #aide ,b4 ,c4 ,*9ese hi/ory possibly began z e>ly z #bcef ,b4 ,c4 7,legge74 ,! old ,empire 9 ,egypt possibly began z e>ly z #bfej ,b4 ,c4 ,rawl9son puts ! flood at #cfjj ,b4 ,c41 & adds #bjjj ye>s betwe5 ! deluge & ! creation1 mak+ ! age ( ! _w #ahhf #cfjj #bjjj #gdhf4 ,s4 ,r4 ,pattison1 9 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #c3 no4 #ac1 concludes t 8a t]m ( ab\t #hjjj ye>s is w>rant$ by d$uctions f hi/ory1 geology1 & ,scripture40 ,see also ,duke ( ,argyll1 ,primeval ,man1 #gf-abh2 ,c[les on ,g5esis1 #di-hj2 ,dawson1 ,fossil ,m51 #bdf2 ,hicks1 9 ,bap4 ,rev41 ,july1 #ahhd 7#aejjj ye>s72 ,zckl]1 ,urges*i*te d] ,erde und des ,m5s*51 #acg-afc4 ,on ! critical side1 see ,crook]1 ,! ,new ,bible & its ,uses1 #hj-ajb4 ,evid5ce ( a geological nature seems to be accumulat+1 :i* t5ds to prove man's adv5t ^u e>? at lea/ t5 ?\s& ye>s ago4 ,an arr[head ( temp]$ copp] & a numb] ( human bones 7 f\nd 9 ! ,rocky ,po9t m9es1 ne> ,gilman1 ,colorado1 #dfj feet b5ea? ! surface ( ! e>?1 emb$d$ 9 a ve9 ( silv]-be>+ ore4 ,m ?an a hundr$ doll>s wor? ( ore clung to ! bones :5 !y 7 remov$ f ! m9e4 ,on ! age ( ! e>? & ! antiquity ( man1 see ,g4 ,f4 ,wright1 ,man & ! ,glacial ,epo*1 lectures ,,iv & ,x1 & 9 ,mc,clure's ,magaz9e1 ,june1 #aija1 & ,bib4 ,sac41 #aijc3ca--8;,*>les ,d>w9 fir/ talk$ ab\t #cjj million ye>s z a m]e trifle ( geologic "t4 ,8 son ,george limits x to #ej or #ajj million2 ,croll & ,"y to #fj or #gj million2 ,wallace to #bh million2 ,"l ,kelv9 to #bd million2 ,?ompson & ,newcomb to only #aj million40 ,sir ,ar*ibald ,geikie1 at ! ,briti% ,association at ,dov] 9 #ahii1 said t #ajj million ye>s suffic$ = t small portion ( ! e>?'s hi/ory :i* is regi/]$ 9 ! /ratifi$ rocks ( ! cru/4 ,%al]1 ,int]pretation ( ,nature1 #abb1 consid]s vegetable life to h exi/$ on ! planet = at lea/ #ajj million ye>s4 ,w>r5 ,upham1 9 ,pop4 ,sci5ce ,mon?ly1 ,dec4 #ahic3aec--8;,h[ old is ! e>?8 #ajj million ye>s40 ,d4 ,g4 ,br9ton1 9 ,=um1 ,dec4 #ahic3ded1 puts ! m9imum limit ( man's exi/5ce on e>? at #ej1jjj ye>s4 ,g4 ,f4 ,wright does n d\bt t man's pres5ce on ?is cont95t 0 preglacial1 say elev5 or twelve ?\s& ye>s ago4 ,he ass]ts t !re has be5 a subsid5ce ( ,c5tral ,asia & ,s\!rn ,russia s9ce man's adv5t1 & t ,arctic seals are /ill f\nd 9 ,lake ,baikal 9 ,sib]ia4 ,:ile he grants t ,egyptian civilization may g back to #ejjj ,b4 ,c41 he holds t no m ?an #fjjj or #gjjj ye>s be=e ?is are ne$$ z prep>ation = hi/ory4 ,le ,conte1 ,elem5ts ( ,geology1 #fac--8,m5 saw ! great glaci]s ( ! second glacial epo*1 b !re is no reliable evid5ce ( _! exi/5ce be=e ! fir/ glacial epo*4 ,deltas1 implem5ts1 lake %ores1 wat]falls1 indicate only #gjjj to #aj1jjj ye>s40 ,rec5t calculations ( ,pr(4 ,pre/wi*1 ! mo/ em95t liv+ geologi/ ( ,great ,brita91 t5d to br+ ! close ( ! glacial epo* d[n to )9 #aj1jjj or #ae1jjj ye>s4 7d7 ,ev5 if error 9 matt]s ( sci5ce 7 f\nd 9 ,scripture1 x w\ld n disprove inspiration1 s9ce inspiration conc]ns itself ) sci5ce only s f> z correct sci5tific views are necess>y to morals & religion4 ,great h>m results f id5tify+ ,*ri/ian doctr9e ) specific !ories ( ! univ]se4 ,! ,roman *ur* held t ! revolution ( ! sun ar\nd ! e>? 0 taught 9 ,scripture1 & t ,*ri/ian fai? requir$ ! condemnation ( ,galileo2 ,john ,wesley ?\ght ,*ri/ianity to be insep>able f a belief 9 wit*craft2 oppos]s ( ! high] criticism reg>d ! ,mosaic au?or%ip ( ! ,p5tateu* z 8articulus /antis vel cad5tis ecclesi40 ,we mi/ake greatly :5 we l9k inspiration ) sci5tific doctr9e4 ,! purpose ( ,scripture is n to tea* sci5ce1 b to tea* religion1 &1 ) ! exception ( ,god's creator%ip & pres]v+ ag5cy 9 ! univ]se1 no sci5tific tru? is ess5tial to ! sy/em ( ,*ri/ian doctr9e4 ,inspiration might leave ! ,scripture writ]s 9 possession ( ! sci5tific ideas ( _! "t1 :ile yet !y 7 emp[]$ correctly to decl>e bo? e?ical & religi\s tru?4 ,a "r _s inde$ ga9s "s insight into ! mean+ ( nature1 & s ! ,scripture writ]s seem to be pres]v$ f incorporat+ into _! productions mu* ( ! sci5tific error ( _! day4 ,b entire fre$om f su* error mu/ n be reg>d$ z a necess>y accompanim5t ( inspiration4 #b4 ,errors 9 matt]s ( ,hi/ory4 ,to ?is objection we reply3 7a7 ,:at are *>g$ z su* are (t5 m]e mi/akes 9 transcription1 & h no =ce z argum5ts aga9/ inspiration1 unless x c fir/ be %[n t inspir$ docum5ts are by ! v fact ( _! inspiration exempt f ! op]ation ( ^? laws :i* affect ! transmission ( o!r anci5t docum5ts4 ,we h no "r to expect t ! inspiration ( ! orig9al writ] w be foll[$ by a miracle 9 ! case ( e copyi/4 ,:y believe 9 infallible copyi/s1 m ?an 9 infallible pr9t]s8 ,god educates u to c>e = 8 ^w1 & = its correct transmission4 ,rev]5ce has kept ! ,scriptures m free f v>i\s read+s ?an are o!r anci5t manuscripts4 ,none ( ! exi/+ v>iations endang] any important article ( fai?4 ,yet "s mi/akes 9 transcription !re probably are4 ,9 #a ,*ron4 #bb3ad1 in/ead ( #ajj1jjj tal5ts ( gold & #a1jjj1jjj tal5ts ( silv] 7 #c1gej1jjj1jjj71 ,josephus divides ! sum by t54 ,dr4 ,h[>d ,osgood3 8,a ,fr5* writ]1 ,revill\t1 has acc\nt$ = ! diff]+ numb]s 9 ,k+s & ,*ronicles1 j z he acc\nts = ! same diff]5ces 9 ,egyptian & ,assyrian lat] acc\nts1 by ! *ange 9 ! value ( money & debasem5t ( issues4 ,he %[s ! *ange all ov] ,we/]n ,asia40 ,p] contra1 see ,bacon1 ,g5esis ( ,g5esis1 #de4 ,9 #b ,*ron4 #ac3c1 #ag1 :]e ! numb]s ( m5 9 ! armies ( little ,pale/9e are /at$ z #djj1jjj & #hjj1jjj1 & #ejj1jjj are said to h be5 sla9 9 a s+le battle1 8"s anci5t copies ( ! ,vulgate & ,lat9 translations ( ,josephus h #dj1jjj1 #hj1jjj1 & #ej1jjj02 see ,annotat$ ,p>agraph ,bible1 9 loco4 ,9 #b ,*ron4 #ag3ad-ai1 ,jeho%aphat's army aggregates #a1afj1jjj1 besides ! g>risons ( 8 =tresses4 ,x is possible t by errors 9 transcription ^! numb]s h be5 multipli$ by t54 ,ano!r explanation h[ev]1 & p]haps a m probable "o1 is giv5 "u 7d7 bel[4 ,simil>ly1 comp>e #a ,sam4 #f3ai1 :]e #ej1jgj are sla91 ) ! #gj ( ,josephus2 #b ,sam4 #h3d--8a1gjj horsem510 ) #a ,*ron4 #ah3d--8g1jjj horsem502 ,e/h] #i3af--ge1jjj sla9 by ! ,jews1 ) ,,lxx--#ae1jjj4 ,9 ,mat4 #bg3i1 we h 8,j]emiah0 = 8,ze*>iah0--?is ,calv9 all[s to be a mi/ake2 &1 if a mi/ake1 !n "o made by ! fir/ copyi/1 = x appe>s 9 all ! uncials1 all ! manuscripts & all ! v]sions except ! ,syriac ,pe%ito :]e x is omitt$1 evid5tly on ! au?ority ( ! individual transcrib] & translator4 ,9 ,acts #g3af--8! tomb t ,abraham b\ght0--,hackett reg>ds 8,abraham0 z a cl]ical error = 8,jacob0 7comp>e ,g54 #cc3ah1 #ai74 ,see ,bible ,com41 #c3afe1 #bdi1 #bea1 #cag4 7b7 ,o!r s-call$ errors are to be expla9$ z a p]missible use ( r\nd numb]s1 :i* _c be d5i$ to ! sacr$ writ]s except ^u ! pr9ciple t ma!matical accuracy 0 m important ?an ! g5]al impression to be secur$ by ! n>rative4 ,9 ,numb]s #be3i1 we read t !re fell 9 ! plague #bd1jjj2 #a ,cor4 #aj3h says #bc1jjj4 ,! actual numb] 0 possibly some:]e betwe5 ! two4 ,^u a simil> pr9ciple1 we d n scruple to celebrate ! ,l&+ ( ! ,pilgrims on ,decemb] #bbnd & ! bir? ( ,*ri/ on ,decemb] #be?4 ,we speak ( ! battle ( ,bunk] ,hill1 al?\gh at ,bunk] ,hill no battle 0 really f\ght4 ,9 ,ex4 #ab3dj1 #da1 ! soj\rn ( ! ,israelites 9 ,egypt is decl>$ to be #dcj ye>s4 ,yet ,paul1 9 ,gal4 #c3ag1 says t ! giv+ ( ! law ?r\gh ,moses 0 #dcj ye>s aft] ! call ( ,abraham1 :]eas ! call ( ,abraham took place #bae ye>s be=e ,jacob & 8 sons w5t d[n into ,egypt1 & ,paul %\ld h said #fde ye>s in/ead ( #dcj4 ,franz ,delitzs*3 8,! ,hebrew ,bible c\nts f\r c5turies ( ,egyptian soj\rn 7,g54 #ae3ac-af71 m accurately1 #dcj ye>s 7,ex4 #ab3dj72 b accord+ to ! ,,lxx 7,ex4 #ab3dj7 ?is numb] compreh5ds ! soj\rn 9 ,canaan & ,egypt1 s t #bae ye>s come to ! pilgrimage 9 ,canaan1 & #bae to ! s]vitude 9 ,egypt4 ,?is k9d ( calculation is n exclusively ,hell5i/ic2 x is also f\nd 9 ! olde/ ,pale/9ian ,midra%4 ,paul /&s on ?is side 9 ,gal4 #c3ag1 mak+1 n ! immigration into ,egypt1 b ! cov5ant ) ,abraham ! t]m9us a quo ( ! #dcj ye>s :i* end 9 ! ,exodus f ,egypt & 9 ! legislation02 see also ,hovey1 ,com4 on ,gal4 #c3ag4 ,x 0 n ,paul's purpose to write *ronology1--s he may foll[ ! ,,lxx1 & call ! "t betwe5 ! promise to ,abraham & ! giv+ ( ! law to ,moses #dcj ye>s1 r ?an ! actual #fjj4 ,if he _h giv5 ! l>g] numb]1 x might h l$ to p]plexity & discussion ab\t a matt] :i* _h no?+ to d ) ! vital "q 9 h&4 ,inspiration may h employ$ curr5t ?\gh inaccurate /atem5ts z to matt]s ( hi/ory1 because !y 7 ! be/ available means ( impress+ ^u m5's m9ds tru? ( a m important sort4 ,9 ,g54 #ae3ac ! #dcj ye>s is call$ 9 r\nd numb]s #djj ye>s1 & s 9 ,acts #g3f4 7c7 ,div]sities ( /atem5t 9 acc\nts ( ! same ev5t1 s long z !y t\* no sub/antial tru?1 may be due to ! meagr5ess ( ! n>rative1 & might be fully expla9$ if "s s+le fact1 n[ unrecord$1 7 only kn[n4 ,to expla9 ^! app>5t discrepancies w\ld n only be beside ! purpose ( ! record1 b w\ld de/roy "o valuable evid5ce ( ! indep5d5ce ( ! sev]al writ]s or witnesses4 ,on ! ,/okes trial1 ! judge spoke ( two app>5tly conflict+ te/imonies z nei!r ( !m necess>ily false4 ,on ! diff]5ce betwe5 ,mat!w & ,luke z to ! sc5e ( ! ,s]mon on ! ,m\nt 7,mat4 #e3a2 cf4 ,luke #f3ag7 see ,/anley1 ,s9ai & ,pale/9e1 #cfj4 ,z to "o bl9d man or two 7,mat4 #bj3cj2 cf4 ,luke #ah3ce7 see ,bliss1 ,com4 on ,luke1 #bge1 & ,g>d9]1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,july1 #ahgi3eac1 #ead2 ,jesus may h heal$ ! bl9d m5 dur+ a day's excursion f ,j]i*o1 & x might be describ$ z 8:5 !y w5t out10 or 8z !y drew nigh to ,j]i*o40 ,pr(4 ,m4 ,b4 ,riddle3 8,luke #ah3ce describes ! g5]al movem5t t[>ds ,j]usalem & n ! precise detail prec$+ ! miracle2 ,mat4 #bj3cj intimates t ! miracle occurr$ dur+ an excursion f ! city1--,luke aft]w>ds tell+ ( ! f9al dep>ture02 ,calv9 holds to two meet+s2 ,godet to two cities2 if ,jesus heal$ two bl9d m51 he c]ta9ly heal$ "o1 & ,luke did n ne$ to m5tion m ?an "o1 ev5 if he knew ( bo?2 see ,broadus on ,mat4 #bj3cj4 ,9 ,mat4 #h3bh1 :]e ,mat!w has two demoniacs at ,gad>a & ,luke has only "o at ,g]asa1 ,broadus supposes t ! village ( ,g]asa belong$ to ! t]ritory ( ! city ( ,gad>a1 a few miles to ! ,s\!a/ ( ! lake1 & he quotes ! case ( ,lafayette3 8,9 ! ye> #ahbd ,lafayette visit$ ! ,unit$ ,/ates & 0 welcom$ ) honors & pageants4 ,"s hi/orians w m5tion only ,lafayette1 b o!rs w relate ! same visit z made & ! same honors z enjoy$ by two p]sons1 namely1 ,lafayette & 8 son4 ,w n bo? be "r80 ,on ,*ri/'s la/ ,passov]1 see ,rob9son1 ,h>mony1 #bab2 ,e4 ,h4 ,se>s1 ,f\r? ,gospel1 ,app5dix ,a2 ,ed]%eim1 ,life & ,times ( ! ,messiah1 #b3ejg4 ,augu/9e3 8,locutiones v>i1 s$ non contr>i3 dlv]s1 s$ non adv]s40 ,b>tlett1 9 ,pr9ceton ,rev41 ,jan4 #ahhj3df1 #dg1 gives ! foll[+ mod]n illu/rations3 ,w9sl['s ,j\rnal 7( ,plym\? ,plantation7 speaks ( a %ip s5t out 8by ,ma/] ,?omas ,we/on40 ,b ,brad=d 9 8 f> brief] n>rative ( ! matt]1 m5tions x z s5t 8by ,mr4 ,we/on & ano!r40 ,john ,adams1 9 8 lett]s1 tells ! /ory ( ! daught] ( ,otis ab\t h] fa!r's de/ruction ( 8 own manuscripts4 ,at "o "t he makes h] say3 8,9 "o ( 8 unhappy mom5ts he committ$ !m all to ! flames02 yet1 9 ! second lett]1 %e is made to say t 8he 0 sev]al days 9 do+ x40 ,"o newspap] says3 ,presid5t ,hayes att5d$ ! ,b5n+ton c5t5nial2 ano!r newspap] says3 ! ,presid5t & ,mrs4 ,hayes2 a ?ird3 ! ,presid5t & 8 ,cab9et2 a f\r?3 ! ,presid5t1 ,mrs4 ,hayes & a majority ( 8 ,cab9et4 ,ar*ibald ,=bes1 9 8 acc\nt ( ,napoleon ,,iii at ,s$an1 po9ts out an agreem5t ( n>ratives z to ! sali5t po9ts1 comb9$ ) 8! hopeless & bewild]+ discrepancies z to details10 ev5 z ^! are report$ by eye-witnesses1 includ+ himself1 ,bism>ck1 & ,g5]al ,%]idan :o 0 on ! gr\nd1 z well z o!rs4 ,?ay]1 ,*ange ( ,attitude1 #eb1 speaks ( ,luke's 8plump ana*ronism 9 ! matt] ( ,!udas0--,acts #e3cf--8;,= be=e ^? days rose up ,!udas40 ,josephus1 ,antiquities1 #bj3e3a1 m5tions an insurrection>y ,!udas1 b ! date & o!r incid5ts d n agree ) ^? ( ,luke4 ,josephus h[ev] may h mi/ak5 ! date z easily z ,luke1 or he may ref] to ano!r man ( ! same "n4 ,! inscription on ! ,cross is giv5 9 ,m>k #ae3bf1 z 8,! ,k+ ( ! ,jews02 9 ,luke #bc3ch1 z 8,?is is ! ,k+ ( ! ,jews02 9 ,mat4 #bg3cg1 z 8,?is is ,jesus ! ,k+ ( ! ,jews02 & 9 ,john #ai3ai1 z 8,jesus ( ,naz>e? ! ,k+ ( ! ,jews40 ,! entire sup]scription1 9 ,hebrew1 ,greek & ,lat91 may h conta9$ e ^w giv5 by ! sev]al evangeli/s comb9$1 & may h read 8,?is is ,jesus ( ,naz>e?1 ! ,k+ ( ! ,jews10 & ea* sep>ate report may be entirely correct s f> z x goes4 ,see1 on ! g5]al subject1 ,haley1 ,alleg$ ,discrepancies2 ,fi%]1 ,beg9n+s ( ,*ri/ianity1 #djf-dab4 7d7 ,:ile hi/orical & ar*ological discov]y 9 _m important p>ticul>s goes to su/a9 ! g5]al correctness ( ! ,scripture n>ratives1 & no /atem5t ess5tial to ! moral & religi\s tea*+ ( ,scripture has be5 invalidat$1 inspiration is /ill consi/5t ) mu* imp]fection 9 hi/orical detail & its n>ratives 8d n seem to be exempt$ f possibilities ( error40 ,! words la/ quot$ are ^? ( ,s&ay4 ,9 8 ,bampton ,lectures on ,inspiration1 #djj1 he rem>ks t 8,inspiration belongs to ! hi/orical books r z convey+ a religi\s lesson1 ?an z hi/ories2 r z int]pret+1 ?an z n>rat+ pla9 matt] ( fact4 ,! crucial issue is t 9 ^! la/ respects !y d n seem to be exempt$ f possibilities ( error40 ,r4 ,v4 ,fo/]1 ,sy/ematic ,!ology1 7,cumb]l& ,presbyt]ian73 ,! ,scripture writ]s 87 n inspir$ to d o!rwise ?an to take ^! /atem5ts z !y f\nd !m40 ,in]rancy is n fre$om f mis/atem5ts1 b f error def9$ z 8t :i* misleads 9 any s]i\s or important s5se40 ,:5 we comp>e ! acc\nts ( #a & #b ,*ronicles ) ^? ( #a & #b ,k+s we f9d 9 ! =m] an exagg]ation ( numb]s1 a suppression ( mat]ial unfavorable to ! writ]'s purpose1 & an emphasis ^u t :i* is favorable1 t contra/s /rongly ) ! me?od ( ! latt]4 ,^! *>act]i/ics are s cont9u\s t ! !ory ( mi/akes 9 transcription does n seem suffici5t to acc\nt = ! facts4 ,! au?or's aim 0 to draw out ! religi\s lessons ( ! /ory1 & hi/orical details are to him ( comp>ative unimportance4 ,h4 ,p4 ,smi?1 ,bib4 ,s*ol>%ip & ,inspiration1 #ajh--8;,inspiration did n correct ! ,*ronicl]'s hi/orical po9t ( view1 m ?an x correct$ 8 sci5tific po9t ( view1 :i* no d\bt made ! e>? ! c5tre ( ! sol> sy/em4 ,x !re=e left him op5 to receive docum5ts1 & to use !m1 :i* idealiz$ ! hi/ory ( ! pa/1 & describ$ ,david & ,solomon accord+ to ! ideas ( lat] times & ! prie/ly class4 ,david's s9s are omitt$1 & numb]s are multipli$1 to give great] dignity to ! e>li] k+dom40 ,z ,t5nyson's ,idylls ( ! ,k+ give a nobl] picture ( ,k+ ,ar?ur1 & a m def9ite aspect to 8 hi/ory1 ?an actual records ju/ify1 yet ! picture tea*es great moral & religi\s lessons1 s ! ,*ronicl] seems to h manipulat$ 8 mat]ial 9 ! int]e/ ( religion4 ,matt]s ( ari?metic 7 m9or matt]s4 8,majoribus int5tus e/40 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,! numb]s ( ! ,bible are *>act]i/ic ( a semi-b>b>\s age4 ,! writ]s took c>e to guess en\gh4 ,! t5d5cy ( su* an age is always to exagg]ate40 ,two ,=mosan savages divide five pieces betwe5 !m by tak+ two apiece & ?r[+ "o away4 ,! l[e/ tribes c c\nt only ) ! f+]s ( _! h&s2 :5 !y use _! toes z well1 x m>ks an advance 9 civilization4 ,to ! mod]n *ild a hundr$ is j z great a numb] z a million4 ,s ! e>ly ,scriptures seem to use numb]s ) a *ildlike ignorance z to _! mean+4 ,hundr$s ( ?\s&s c be sub/itut$ = t5s ( ?\s&s1 & ! sub/itution seems only a prop] tribute to ! dignity ( ! subject4 ,gore1 9 ,lux ,mundi1 #cec--8,?is 0 n consci\s p]v]sion1 b unconsci\s idealiz+ ( hi/ory1 ! read+ back into pa/ records ( a ritual developm5t :i* 0 really lat]4 ,inspiration excludes consci\s deception1 b x appe>s to be q consi/5t ) ?is sort ( idealiz+2 always suppos+ t ! result read back into ! e>li] hi/ory does repres5t ! real purpose ( ,god & only anticipates ! realization40 ,!re are "s :o cont5d t ^! hi/orical imp]fections are due to transcription & t !y did n belong to ! orig9al docum5ts4 ,watts1 ,new ,apologetic1 #ga1 #aaa1 :5 ask$ :at is ga9$ by cont5d+ = infallible orig9al autographs if !y h be5 s9ce corrupt$1 replies3 8,j :at we ga9 by cont5d+ = ! orig9al p]fection ( human nature1 ?\gh man has s9ce corrupt$ x4 ,we mu/ believe ,god's own te/imony ab\t 8 own "w4 ,god may p]mit o!rs to d :at1 z a holy righte\s ,god1 he _c d himself40 ,:5 ! objector decl>es x a matt] ( little consequ5ce :e!r a pair ( tr\s]s 7 or 7 n orig9ally p]fect1 s long z !y are badly r5t j n[1 ,watts replies3 8,! tailor :o made !m w\ld probably pref] to h x und]/ood t ! tr\s]s did n leave 8 %op 9 _! pres5t =lorn condition4 ,god drops no /it*es & s5ds out no imp]fect "w40 ,watts h[ev] seems dom9at$ by an a priori !ory ( inspiration1 :i* bl9ds him to ! actual facts ( ! ,bible4 ,evans1 ,bib4 ,s*ol>%ip & ,inspiration1 #dj--8;,does ! pres5t error de/roy ! inspiration ( ! ,bible z we h x8 ,no4 ,!n :y %\ld ! orig9al error de/roy ! inspiration ( ! ,bible1 z x 0 fir/ giv58 ,!re are spots on yond] sun2 d !y /op its be+ ! sun8 ,:y1 ! sun is all ! m a sun = ! spots4 ,s ! ,bible40 ,inspiration seems to h p]mitt$ ! ga!r+ ( su* mat]ial z 0 at h&1 v mu* z a mod]n editor might con/ruct 8 acc\nt ( an army movem5t f ! reports ( a numb] ( obs]v]s2 or z a mod]n hi/orian might comb9e ! records ( a pa/ age ) all _! imp]fections ( detail4 ,9 ! case ( ! ,scripture writ]s1 h[ev]1 we ma9ta9 t inspiration has p]mitt$ no sacrifice ( moral & religi\s tru? 9 ! complet$ ,scripture1 b has wov5 its hi/orical mat]ial toge!r into an organic :ole :i* tea*es all ! facts ess5tial to ! k ( ,*ri/ & ( salvation4 ,:5 we come to exam9e 9 detail :at purport to be hi/orical n>ratives1 we mu/ be nei!r cr$ul\s nor sceptical1 b simply c&id & op5-m9d$4 ,) reg>d = example to ! great age ( ! ,old ,te/am5t patri>*s1 we are no m w>rant$ 9 reject+ ! ,scripture acc\nts ^u ! gr\nd t life 9 lat] times is s mu* %ort]1 ?an we are to reject ! te/imony ( botani/s z to trees ( ! ,sequoia family betwe5 f\r & five hundr$ feet high1 or ! te/imony ( geologi/s z to ,saurians a hundr$ feet long1 ^u ! gr\nd t ! trees & reptiles ) :i* we are acqua9t$ are s mu* small]4 ,e species at its introduction seems to exhibit ! maximum ( size & vitality4 ,weismann1 ,h]$ity1 #f1 #cj--8,:ales live "s hundr$s ( ye>s2 elephants two hundr$--_! ge/ation tak+ two ye>s4 ,giants prove t ! plan ^u :i* man is con/ruct$ c also be c>ri$ out on a scale f> l>g] ?an ! normal "o40 ,e4 ,ray ,lanke/]1 ,adv4 ( ,sci5ce1 #bje-bcg1 #bhf--;agrees ) ,weismann 9 8 g5]al !ory4 ,sir ,george ,cornewall ,lewis long d5i$ c5t5>ism1 b at la/ _h to admit x4 ,*>les ,dudley ,w>n]1 9 ,h>p]'s ,magaz9e1 ,jan4 #ahie1 gives in/ances ( m5 #acg1 #adj1 & #aib ye>s old4 ,! ,g]man ,hall] ass]ts t 8! ultimate limit ( human life does n exce$ two c5turies3 to fix ! exact numb] ( ye>s is exce$+ly difficult40 ,j4 ,norman ,locky]1 9 ,nature1 reg>ds ! ye>s ( ! patri>*s z lun> ye>s4 ,9 ,egypt1 ! sun be+ us$1 ! unit ( "t 0 a ye>2 b 9 ,*aldea1 ! unit ( "t 0 a mon?1 = ! reason t ! /&>d ( "t 0 ! moon4 ,divide ! numb]s by twelve1 & ! lives ( ! patri>*s come out v mu* ! same l5g? ) lives at ! pres5t day4 ,we may ask1 h[ev]1 h[ ?is !ory w\ld "w 9 %ort5+ ! lives betwe5 ,noah & ,moses4 ,on ! g5ealogies 9 ,mat!w & ,luke1 see ,"l ,h>vey1 ,g5ealogies ( our ,"l1 & 8 art1 9 ,smi?'s ,bible ,diction>y2 p] contra1 see ,&rews1 ,life ( ,*ri/1 #ee sq4 ,on ,quir9ius & ! enrollm5t = taxation 7,luke #b3b71 see ,pres4 ,woolsey1 9 ,new ,engl&]1 #ahfi4 ,on ! g5]al subject1 see ,rawl9son1 ,hi/orical ,evid5ces1 & essay 9 ,mod]n ,scepticism1 publi%$ by ,*ri/ian ,evid5ce ,society1 #a3bfe2 ,crook]1 ,new ,bible & ,new ,uses1 #ajb-abf4 #c4 ,errors 9 ,morality4 7a7 ,:at are *>g$ z su* are sometimes evil acts & words ( good m5--words & acts n sanction$ by ,god4 ,^! are n>rat$ by ! inspir$ writ]s z simple matt] ( hi/ory1 & subsequ5t results1 or ! /ory itself1 is left to po9t ! moral ( ! tale4 ,in/ances ( ?is sort are ,noah's drunk5ness 7,g54 #i3bj-bg72 ,lot's ince/ 7,g54 #ai3cj-ch72 ,jacob's falsehood 7,g54 #bg3ai-bd72 ,david's adult]y 7#b ,sam4 #aa3a-d72 ,pet]'s d5ial 7,mat4 #bf3fi-ge74 ,see ,lee1 ,inspiration1 #bfe1 note4 ,e/h]'s v9dictiv5ess is n comm5d$1 nor are ! *>act]s ( ! ,book ( ,e/h] said to h act$ 9 ob$i5ce to a div9e comm&4 ,crane1 ,religion ( ,to-morr[1 #bda--8;,9 law & psalm & prophecy we behold ! influ5ce ( ,jehovah work+ z leav5 among a primitive & b>b>\s p4 ,contemplat+ ! ,old ,scriptures 9 ?is light1 !y become lum9\s ) div9ity1 & we are furni%$ ) ! pr9ciple by :i* to discrim9ate betwe5 ! div9e & ! human 9 ! book4 ,p>ticul>ly 9 ,david d we see a rugg$1 half-civiliz$1 k+ly man1 full ( gross errors1 fle%ly & impetu\s1 yet p]meat$ ) a div9e ,_s t lifts him1 /ruggl+1 weep+1 & w>r+1 up to "s ( ! l(tie/ conceptions ( ,deity :i* ! m9d ( man has conceiv$4 ,z an angelic be+1 ,david is a c>icature2 z a man ( ,god1 z an example ( ,god mov+ ^u & rais+ up a mo/ human man1 he is a spl5did example4 ,! pro( t ! *ur* is ( ,god1 is n its impeccability1 b its progress40 7b7 ,:]e evil acts appe> at fir/ sight to be sanction$1 x is frequ5tly "s "r int5t or accompany+ virtue1 r ?an ! act itself1 ^u :i* comm5dation is be/[$4 ,z ,rehab's fai?1 n h] duplicity 7,jo%4 #b3a-bd2 cf4 ,heb4 #aa3ca & ,james #b3be72 ,jael's patriotism1 n h] trea*]y 7,judges #d3ag-bb2 cf4 #e3bd74 ,or did !y ca/ 9 _! lot ) ,israel & use ! common /ratagems ( w> 7see next p>agraph78 ,h]d]3 8,! limitations ( ! pupil are also limitations ( ! tea*]40 ,:ile ,dean ,/anley praises ,solomon = tol]at+ idolatry1 ,james ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy1 #b3acg1 rem>ks3 8,x w\ld be a ridicul\s p$antry to apply ! ,prote/ant pleas ( private judgm5t to su* communities z anci5t ,egypt & ,assyria4444 ,x is ! survival ( co]cion1 aft] consci5ce has be5 born to sup]s$e x1 t %ocks & revolts u 9 p]secution40 7c7 ,c]ta9 comm&s & de$s are sanction$ z relatively j--expressions ( ju/ice su* z ! age c\ld compreh5d1 & are to be judg$ z p>ts ( a progressively unfold+ sy/em ( morality ^: key & culm9ation we h 9 ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,ex4 #bj3be--8;,i gave !m /atutes t 7 n good0--z ,moses' p]mission ( divorce & retaliation 7,deut4 #bd3a2 cf4 ,mat4 #e3ca1 #cb2 #ai3g-i2 ,ex4 #ba3bd2 cf4 ,mat4 #e3ch1 #ci74 ,comp>e ,elijah's call+ d[n fire f heav5 7#b ,k4 #a3aj-ab7 ) ,jesus' refusal to d ! same1 & 8 intimation t ! _s ( ,elijah 0 n ! _s ( ,*ri/ 7,luke #i3eb-ef72 cf4 ,mat!son1 ,mom5ts on ! ,m\nt1 #bec-bee1 on ,mat4 #ag3h--8;,jesus only03 8,! /r5g? ( ,elias pal$ be=e him4 ,to %$ ! blood ( enemies requires less /r5g? ?an to %$ "o's own blood1 & to conqu] by fire is easi] ?an to conqu] by love40 ,hovey3 8,9 div9e revelation1 x is fir/ />light1 !n dawn1 f9ally day40 ,george ,wa%+ton once gave directions = ! transportation to ! ,we/ ,indies & ! sale !re ( a refractory negro :o _h giv5 him tr\ble4 ,?is 0 n at v>iance ) ! be/ morality ( 8 "t1 b x w\ld n suit ! improv$ e?ical /&>ds ( today4 ,! use ( =ce r ?an moral suasion is sometimes ne$$ by *ildr5 & by b>b>ians4 ,we may illu/rate by ! ,sunday ,s*ool s*ol>'s unrul9ess :i* 0 cur$ by 8 classmates dur+ ! week4 8,:at did y say to him80 ask$ ! tea*]4 8,we didn't say no?+2 we j pun*$ 8 head = him40 ,?is 0 ,old ,te/am5t righte\sness4 ,! appeal 9 ! ,o4 ,t4 to ! hope ( e>?ly rew>ds 0 suitable to a /age ( developm5t n yet in/ruct$ z to heav5 & hell by ! com+ & "w ( ,*ri/2 comp>e ,ex4 #bj3ab ) ,mat4 #e3aj2 #be3df4 ,! ,old ,te/am5t aim$ to fix 9 ! m9d ( a select$ p ! idea ( ! unity & hol9ess ( ,god2 9 ord] to ext]m9ate idolatry1 mu* o!r tea*+ 0 po/pon$4 ,see ,peabody1 ,religion ( ,nature1 #de2 ,mozley1 ,rul+ ,ideas ( ,e>ly ,ages2 ,gre51 9 ,presb4 ,qu>41 ,april1 #ahgg3bba-beb2 ,mc,ilvaine1 ,wisdom ( ,holy ,scripture1 #cbh-cfh2 ,brit4 & ,=4 ,evang4 ,rev41 ,jan4 #ahgh3a-cb2 ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy1 #b3acg4 ,:5 !re=e we f9d 9 ! inspir$ song ( ,deborah1 ! prophetess 7,judges #e3cj71 an allusion to ! common spoils ( w>--8a damsel1 two damsels to e man0 or 9 ,prov4 #ca3f1 #g--8;,give /rong dr9k unto him t is ready to p]i%1 & w9e unto ! bitt] 9 s\l4 ,let him dr9k1 & =get 8 pov]ty1 & rememb] 8 mis]y no m0--we d n ne$ to ma9ta9 t ^! passages furni% /&>ds = our mod]n conduct4 ,dr4 ,fi%] calls ! latt] 8! wor/ advice to a p]son 9 affliction1 or dispirit$ by ! loss ( prop]ty40 ,!y m>k pa/ /ages 9 ,god's provid5tial lead+ ( mank9d4 ,a high] /age inde$ is already intimat$ 9 ,prov4 #ca3d--8;x is n = k+s to dr9k w9e1 ,nor = pr9ces to say1 ,:]e is /rong dr9k80 ,we see t ,god c\ld use v imp]fect in/rum5ts & c\ld inspire v imp]fect m54 ,_m ?+s 7 p]mitt$ = m5's 8h>dness ( he>t0 7,mat4 #ai3h74 ,! ,s]mon on ! ,m\nt is a great advance on ! law ( ,moses 7,mat4 #e3ba--8,ye h he>d t x 0 said to !m ( old "t02 cf4 #bb--8;,b ,i say unto y074 ,rob]t ,g4 ,+]soll w\ld h lo/ 8 /ock 9 trade if ,*ri/ians _h g5]ally recogniz$ t revelation is gradual1 & is complet$ only 9 ,*ri/4 ,?is gradualness ( revelation is conc$$ 9 ! common phrase3 8! new disp5sation40 ,abraham ,l9coln %[$ 8 wisdom by nev] go+ f> ahead ( ! common s5se ( ! p4 ,god simil>ly adapt$ 8 legislation to ! capacities ( ea* successive age4 ,! comm& to ,abraham to sacrifice 8 son 7,g54 #bb3a-ai7 0 a prop] te/ ( ,abraham's fai? 9 a day :5 human sacrifice violat$ no common e?ical /&>d because ! ,hebrew1 l ! ,roman1 8patria pote/as0 did n reg>d ! *ild z hav+ a sep>ate individuality1 b includ$ ! *ild 9 ! p>5t & made ! *ild equally responsible = ! p>5t's s94 ,b t v comm& 0 giv5 only z a te/ ( fai?1 & ) ! int5t to make ! int5d$ ob$i5ce ! occasion ( reveal+ ,god's provision ( a sub/itute & s ( do+ away ) human sacrifice = all future "t4 ,we may well imitate ! gradualness ( div9e revelation 9 our treatm5t ( danc+ & ( ! liquor traffic4 7d7 ,god's righte\s sov]eignty af=ds ! key to o!r ev5ts4 ,he has ! "r to d :at he w ) 8 own1 & to puni% ! transgressor :5 & :]e he w2 & he may ju/ly make m5 ! =etell]s or executors ( 8 purposes4 ,=etell]s1 z 9 ! imprecatory ,psalms 7#acg3i2 cf4 ,is4 #ac3af-ah & ,j]4 #ej3af1 #bi72 executors1 z 9 ! de/ruction ( ! ,canaanites 7,deut4 #g3b1 #af74 ,9 ! =m] case ! ,psalm 0 n ! ebullition ( p]sonal ang]1 b ! expression ( judicial indignation aga9/ ! enemies ( ,god4 ,we mu/ di/+ui% ! sub/ance f ! =m4 ,! sub/ance 0 ! d5unciation ( ,god's righte\s judgm5ts2 ! =m 0 tak5 f ! ord9>y cu/oms ( w> 9 ! ,psalmi/'s "t4 ,see ,p>k1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahfb3afe2 ,c[les1 ,com4 on ,ps4 #acg2 ,p][ne on ,psalms1 ,introd41 #fa2 ,presb4 & ,ref4 ,rev41 #ahig3dij-eje2 cf4 #b ,tim4 #d3ad--8! ,"l w r5d] to him accord+ to 8 works0--a prophecy1 n a curse1 1 n 1 z 9 ,a4 ,v4 ,9 ! latt] case1 an ext]m9at+ w> 0 only ! b5evol5t surg]y t amputat$ ! putrid limb1 & s sav$ ! religi\s life ( ! ,hebrew nation & ( ! aft]-_w4 ,see ,dr4 ,?omas ,arnold1 ,essay on ! ,"r ,int]pretation ( ,scripture2 ,fi%]1 ,beg9n+s ( ,*ri/ianity1 #aa-bd4 ,ano!r int]pretation ( ^! ev5ts has be5 propos$1 :i* w\ld make !m illu/rations ( ! pr9ciple indicat$ 9 7c7 above3 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #de--8;,x 0 n ! imprecations ( ! ,psalm t 7 inspir$ ( ,god1 b 8 purposes & ideas ( :i* ^! 7 by ! times ! necess>y vehicle2 j z ! adult]y ( ,david 0 n by div9e comm&1 ?\gh ?r\gh x ! purpose ( ,god z to ,*ri/'s desc5t 0 accompli%$40 ,john ,watson 7,ian ,macl>571 ,cure ( ,s\ls1 #adc--8,:5 ! massacre ( ! ,canaanites & c]ta9 proce$+s ( ,david are flung 9 ! face ( ,*ri/ians1 x is no long] necess>y to fall back on evasions or special plead+4 ,x c n[ be frankly admitt$ t1 f our /&po9t 9 ?is ye> ( grace1 su* de$s 7 atroci\s1 & t !y nev] c\ld h be5 accord+ to ! m9d ( ,god1 b t !y mu/ be judg$ by _! date1 & consid]$ ! defects ( elem5t>y moral processes4 ,! ,bible is v9dicat$1 because x is1 on ! :ole1 a /eady asc5t1 & because x culm9ates 9 ,*ri/40 ,lyman ,abbott1 ,!ology ( an ,evolutioni/1 #ef--8;,abraham mi/ook ! voice ( consci5ce1 call+ on him to consecrate 8 only son to ,god1 & int]pret$ x z a comm& to slay 8 son z a burnt (f]+4 ,israel mis9t]pret$ 8 righte\s indignation at ! cruel & lu/ful rites ( ! ,canaaniti% religion z a div9e summons to de/roy ! wor%ip by putt+ ! wor%ip]s to dea?2 a p undevelop$ 9 moral judgm5t c\ld n di/+ui% betwe5 =mal regulations respect+ camp-life & et]nal pr9ciples ( righte\sness1 su* z1 ,?\ %alt love ?y neighbor z ?yself1 b embodi$ !m 9 ! same code1 & seem$ to reg>d !m z ( equal au?ority40 ,wilk9son1 ,epic ( ,paul1 #bha--8;,if s be su* man1 s plac$ 444 did 9 "s "p ,t utt]ance make 8 own1 pr(an+ x1 ,to be 8 vehicle = s5se n meant ,by ! augu/ supreme inspir+ ,w0--i4 e41 putt+ "s ( 8 own s9ful ang] into ,god's calm pr$ictions ( judgm5t4 ,comp>e ! /]n la/ words ( 8,ze*>iah1 ! son ( ,jehoiada1 ! prie/0 :5 /on$ to dea? 9 ! temple c\rt3 8,jehovah look ^u x & require x0 7#b ,*ron4 #bd3bj-bb71 ) ! la/ words ( ,jesus3 8,fa!r1 =give !m1 = !y "k n :at !y d0 7,luke #bc3cd7 & ( ,/eph53 8,"l1 lay n ?is s9 to _! *>ge0 7,acts #g3fj74 7e7 ,o!r app>5t immoralities are due to unw>rant$ int]pretations4 ,symbol is sometimes tak5 = lit]al fact2 ! language ( irony is und]/ood z sob] affirmation2 ! gl[ & fre$om ( ,ori5tal description are judg$ by ! unimpassion$ /yle ( ,we/]n lit]ature2 appeal to l[] motives is tak5 to exclude1 in/ead ( prep>+ =1 ! high]4 ,9 ,hosea #a3b1 #c1 ! comm& to ! prophet to m>ry a h>lot 0 probably receiv$ & execut$ 9 vision1 & 0 int5d$ only z symbolic3 comp>e ,j]4 #be3ae-ah--8,take ?is cup 444 & cause all ! nations 444 to dr9k40 ,lit]al ob$i5ce w\ld h made ! prophet contemptible to ^? :om he w\ld in/ruct1 & w\ld require s long a "t z to weak51 if n de/roy1 ! design$ effect2 see ,ann4 ,p>4 ,bible1 9 loco4 ,9 #b ,k4 #f3ai1 ,eli%a's deception1 s call$1 0 probably only ironical & b5evol5t2 ! enemy d>$ n resi/1 because !y 7 completely 9 8 p[]4 ,9 ! ,song ( ,solomon1 we h1 z ,jewi% writ]s h always held1 a highly-wr\ght dramatic description ( ! union betwe5 ,jehovah & 8 p1 :i* we mu/ judge by ,ea/]n & n by ,we/]n lit]>y /&>ds4 ,francis ,w4 ,newman1 9 8 ,phases ( ,fai?1 accus$ ev5 ! ,new ,te/am5t ( pres5t+ l[ motives = human ob$i5ce4 ,x is true t all "r motives are appeal$ to1 & "s ( ^! motives are ( a high] sort ?an are o!rs4 ,hope ( heav5 & fe> ( hell are n ! highe/ motives1 b !y may be employ$ z prelim9>y incitem5ts to action1 ev5 ?\gh only love = ,god & = hol9ess w ensure salvation4 ,su* motives are urg$ bo? by ,*ri/ & by 8 apo/les3 ,mat4 #f3bj--8lay up = y\rselves treasures 9 heav502 #aj3bh--8;fe> him :o is able to de/roy bo? s\l & body 9 hell02 ,jude #bc--8"s save ) fe>1 snat*+ !m out ( ! fire40 ,9 ?is respect ! ,n4 ,t4 does n diff] f ! ,o4 ,t4 ,george ,adam ,smi? has po9t$ out t ! royali/s got _! texts1 8! p[]s t be0 7,rom4 #ac3a7 & 8! k+ z supreme0 7#a ,pet4 #b3ac71 f ! ,n4 ,t41 :ile ! ,o4 ,t4 furni%$ texts = ! def5d]s ( lib]ty4 ,:ile ! ,o4 ,t4 deals ) national life1 & ! dis*>ge ( social & political functions1 ! ,n4 ,t4 deals 9 ! ma9 ) individuals & ) _! relations to ,god4 ,on ! :ole subject1 see ,hessey1 ,moral ,difficulties ( ! ,bible2 ,jellett1 ,moral ,difficulties ( ! ,o4 ,t42 ,fai? & ,free ,?\ght 7,lect4 by ,*ri/4 ,ev4 ,soc471 #b3agc2 ,rog]s1 ,eclipse ( ,fai?2 ,butl]1 ,analogy1 "p ii1 *ap4 iii2 ,orr1 ,problem ( ! ,o4 ,t41 #dfe-dhc4 #d4 ,errors ( ,reason+4 7a7 ,:at are *>g$ z su* are g5]ally to be expla9$ z valid argum5t express$ 9 highly cond5s$ =m4 ,! appe>ance ( error may be due to ! suppression ( "o or m l9ks 9 ! reason+4 ,9 ,mat4 #bb3cb1 ,*ri/'s argum5t = ! resurrection1 drawn f ! fact t ,god is ! ,god ( ,abraham1 ,isaac1 & ,jacob1 is p]fectly & obvi\sly valid1 ! mom5t we put 9 ! suppress$ premise t ! liv+ relation to ,god :i* is "h impli$ _c prop]ly be conceiv$ z some?+ m]ely spiritual1 b necess>ily requires a new & re/or$ life ( ! body4 ,if ,god is ! ,god ( ! liv+1 !n ,abraham1 ,isaac1 & ,jacob %all rise f ! dead4 ,see m full exposition1 "u ,es*atology4 ,"s ( ! ,scripture argum5ts are en?ymemes1 & an en?ymeme1 accord+ to ,arbu?not & ,pope1 is 8a syllogism 9 :i* ! major is m>ri$ to ! m9nor1 & ! m>riage is kept secret40 7b7 ,:]e we _c see ! propriety ( ! conclusions drawn f giv5 premises1 !re is great] reason to attribute our failure to ignorance ( div9e logic on our "p1 ?an to accommodation or ad hom9em argum5ts on ! "p ( ! ,scripture writ]s4 ,by div9e logic we mean simply a logic ^: elem5ts & processes are correct1 ?\gh n und]/ood by u4 ,9 ,heb4 #g3i1 #aj 7,levi's pay+ ti!s 9 ,abraham71 !re is probably a recognition ( ! organic unity ( ! family1 :i* 9 m9iature illu/rates ! organic unity ( ! race4 ,9 ,gal4 #c3bj--8;a m$iator is n a m$iator ( "o2 b ,god is "o0--! law1 ) its two contract+ p>ties1 is contra/$ ) ! promise1 :i* proce$s f ! sole fiat ( ,god & is !re=e un*angeable4 ,paul's argum5t "h re/s on ,*ri/'s div9ity z its f\ndation--o!rwise ,*ri/ w\ld h be5 a m$iator 9 ! same s5se 9 :i* ,moses 0 a m$iator 7see ,lightfoot1 9 loco74 ,9 ,gal4 #d3ba-ca1 ,hag> & ,i%mael on ! "o h&1 & ,s>ah & ,isaac on ! o!r1 illu/rate ! exclusion ( ! bondm5 ( ! law f ! privileges ( ! spiritual se$ ( ,abraham4 ,abraham's two wives1 & ! two classes ( p 9 ! two sons1 repres5t ! two cov5ants 7s ,calv974 ,9 ,john #aj3cd--8;,i said1 ,ye are gods10 ! implication is t ,judaism 0 n a sy/em ( m]e mono!ism1 b ( !ism t5d+ to !an?ropism1 a real union ( ,god & man 7,we/cott1 ,bib4 ,com41 9 loco74 ,godet well rem>ks t he :o d\bts ,paul's logic w d well fir/ to suspect 8 own4 7c7 ,! adoption ( ,jewi% me?ods ( reason+1 :]e x c\ld be prov$1 w\ld n indicate error on ! "p ( ! ,scripture writ]s1 b r an inspir$ sanction ( ! me?od z appli$ to t p>ticul> case4 ,9 ,gal4 #c3af--8;,he sai? n1 ,& to se$s1 z ( _m2 b z ( "o1 ,& to ?y se$1 :i* is ,*ri/40 ,"h x is intimat$ t ! v =m ( ! expression 9 ,g54 #bb3ah1 :i* d5otes unity1 0 select$ by ! ,holy ,_s z significant ( t "o p]son1 ,*ri/1 :o 0 ! true se$ ( ,abraham & 9 :om all nations 7 to be bless$4 ,argum5t f ! =m ( a s+le ^w is 9 ?is case correct1 al?\gh ! ,rabb9s (t5 made m ( s+le words ?an ! ,holy ,_s ev] int5d$4 ,watts1 ,new ,apologetic1 #fi--8;,f4 ,w4 ,f>r> ass]ts t ! plural ( ! ,hebrew or ,greek t]ms = #8se$' is nev] us$ by ,hebrew or ,greek writ]s z a designation ( human (fspr+4 ,b see ,sophocles1 dipus at ,colonus1 #eii1 #fjj-- --#8,i 0 driv5 away f my own c\ntry by my own (fspr+4' 0 ,9 #a ,cor4 #aj3a-f--8;& ! rock 0 ,*ri/0--! ,rabb9ic tradition t ! smitt5 rock foll[$ ! ,israelites 9 _! w&]+s is decl>$ to be only ! absurd lit]aliz+ ( a spiritual fact--! cont9ual pres5ce ( ,*ri/1 z prexi/5t ,logos1 ) 8 anci5t p4 ,p] contra1 see ,r[1 ,rev4 & ,mod4 ,!ories1 #ih-abh4 7d7 ,if x %\ld appe> h[ev] ^u fur!r inve/igation t ,rabb9ical me?ods h be5 wrongly employ$ by ! apo/les 9 _! argum5tation1 we might /ill di/+ui% betwe5 ! tru? !y are seek+ to convey & ! argum5ts by :i* !y support x4 ,inspiration may conceivably make kn[n ! tru?1 yet leave ! expression ( ! tru? to human dialectic z well z to human rhetoric4 ,johnson1 ,quotations ( ! ,n4 ,t4 f ! ,o4 ,t41 #acg1 #ach--8;,9 ! utt] abs5ce ( all evid5ce to ! contr>y1 we ought to suppose t ! allegories ( ! ,n4 ,t4 are l ! allegories ( lit]ature 9 g5]al1 m]ely lum9\s embodim5ts ( ! tru?4444 ,if ^! allegories are n pres5t$ by _! writ]s z evid5ces1 !y are none ! less preci\s1 s9ce !y illum9ate ! tru? o!rwise ev9c$1 & ?us r5d] x at once cle> to ! appreh5sion & attractive to ! ta/e40 ,if h[ev] ! purpose ( ! writ]s 0 to use ^! allegories = pro(1 we may /ill see %9+ ?r\gh ! rifts ( _! traditional logic ! tru? :i* !y 7 /riv+ to set =?4 ,inspiration may h put !m 9 possession ( ?is tru? )\t alt]+ _! ord9>y s*ola/ic me?ods ( demon/ration & expression4 ,horton1 ,inspiration1 #ajh--8;,discrepancies & illogical reason+s 7 b inequalities or cracks 9 ! mirrors1 :i* did n mat]ially di/ort or hide ! ,p]son0 ^: glory !y s\ght to reflect4 ,lu!r w5t ev5 fur!r ?an ?is :5 he said t a c]ta9 argum5t 9 ! epi/le 0 8good en\gh = ! ,galatians40 #e4 ,errors 9 quot+ or int]pret+ ! ,old ,te/am5t4 7a7 ,:at are *>g$ z su* are commonly int]pretations ( ! mean+ ( ! orig9al ,scripture by ! same ,_s :o fir/ inspir$ x4 ,9 ,eph4 #e3ad1 8arise f ! dead1 & ,*ri/ %all %9e ^u !e0 is an inspir$ int]pretation ( ,is4 #fj3a--8;,arise1 %9e2 = ?y light is come40 ,ps4 #fh3ah--8,?\ ha/ receiv$ gifts among m50--is quot$ 9 ,eph4 #d3h z 8gave gifts to m540 ,! words 9 ,hebrew are probably a concise expression = 8?\ ha/ tak5 spoil :i* ?\ maye/ di/ribute z gifts to m540 ,eph4 #d3h agrees exactly ) ! s5se1 ?\gh n ) ! words1 ( ! ,psalm4 ,9 ,heb4 #aa3ba1 8,jacob 444 wor%ip$1 lean+ ^u ! top ( 8 /aff0 7,,lxx72 ,g54 #dg3ca has 8b[$ himself ^u ! b$'s head40 ,! mean+ is ! same1 = ! /aff ( ! *ief & ! spe> ( ! w>rior 7 set at ! b$'s head4 ,jacob1 too feeble to rise1 pray$ 9 8 b$4 ,"h ,calv9 says t 8! apo/le does n hesitate to accommodate to 8 own purpose :at 0 commonly receiv$1--!y 7 n s scrupul\s0 z to details4 ,ev5 ,gordon1 ,m9i/ry ( ! ,_s1 #agg1 speaks ( 8a re%ap+ ( 8 own words by ! ,au?or ( !m40 ,we pref]1 ) ,calv91 to see 9 ^! quotations evid5ce t ! sacr$ writ]s 7 insi/5t ^u ! sub/ance ( ! tru? r ?an ^u ! =m1 ! _s r ?an ! lett]4 7b7 ,:]e an app>5tly false translation is quot$ f ! ,septuag9t1 ! sanction ( inspiration is giv5 to x1 z express+ a "p at lea/ ( ! fulness ( mean+ conta9$ 9 ! div9e orig9al--a fulness ( mean+ :i* two v>y+ translations d n 9 "s cases exhau/4 ,ps4 #d3d--;,heb43 8,tremble1 & s9 n0 7 no long]72 ,,lxx3 8,be ye angry1 & s9 n40 ,eph4 #d3bf quotes ! ,,lxx4 ,! words may orig9ally h be5 address$ to ,david's comrades1 exhort+ !m to keep _! ang] )9 b\nds4 ,bo? translations toge!r are ne$$ to br+ out ! mean+ ( ! orig9al4 ,ps4 #dj3f-h--8,m9e e>s ha/ ?\ op5$0 is translat$ 9 ,heb4 #aj3e-g--8;a body did/ ?\ prep>e = me40 ,"h ! ,epi/le quotes f ! ,,lxx4 ,b ! ,hebrew means lit]ally3 8,m9e e>s ha/ ?\ bor$0--an allusion to ! cu/om ( p9n+ a slave to ! doorpo/ ( 8 ma/] by an awl driv5 ?r\gh 8 e>1 9 tok5 ( 8 complete subjection4 ,! s5se ( ! v]se is !re=e giv5 9 ! ,epi/le3 8,?\ ha/ made me ?9e 9 body & s\l--lo1 ,i come to d ?y w40 ,a4 ,c4 ,k5drick3 8,david1 j ent]+ ^u 8 k+dom aft] p]secution1 is a type ( ,*ri/ ent]+ on 8 e>?ly mission4 ,h5ce ,david's words are put into ! m\? ( ,*ri/4 ,= #8e>s1' ! organs ) :i* we he> & obey & :i* ,david conceiv$ to be holl[$ out = him by ,god1 ! au?or ( ! ,hebrews sub/itutes ! ^w #8body1' z ! g5]al in/rum5t ( do+ ,god's w0 7,com4 on ,heb4 #aj3e-g74 7c7 ,! fre$om ( ^! inspir$ int]pretations1 h[ev]1 does n w>rant u 9 l fre$om ( int]pretation 9 ! case ( o!r passages ^: mean+ has n be5 au?oritatively made kn[n4 ,we h no reason to believe t ! sc>let ?read ( ,rahab 7,jo%4 #b3ah7 0 a design$ prefiguration ( ! blood ( ,*ri/1 nor t ! ?ree measures ( meal 9 :i* ! woman hid h] leav5 7,mat4 #ac3cc7 symboliz$ ,%em1 ,ham & ,japhe?1 ! ?ree divisions ( ! human race4 ,c4 ,h4 ,m41 9 8 notes on ! tab]nacle 9 ,exodus1 tells u t 8! loops ( blue heav5ly grace2 ! ta*es ( gold ! div9e en]gy ( ,*ri/2 ! rams' sk9s dy$ r$ ,*ri/'s consecration & devot$ness2 ! badg]s' sk9s 8 holy vigilance aga9/ temptation06 ,! tab]nacle 0 inde$ a type ( ,*ri/ 7,john #a3ad--4 #b3ai1 #ba--8;9 ?ree days ,i w raise x up 444 b he spake ( ! temple ( 8 body072 yet x does n foll[ t e detail ( ! /ructure 0 significant4 ,s ea* p>able tea*es "s "o ma9 lesson1--! p>ticul>s may be m]e drap]y2 & :ile we may use ! p>ables = illu/ration1 we %\ld nev] ascribe div9e au?ority to our private impressions ( _! mean+4 ,mat4 #be3a-ac--! p>able ( ! five wise & ! five fooli% virg9s--has be5 made to tea* t ! numb] ( ! sav$ precisely equals ! numb] ( ! lo/4 ,augu/9e def5d$ p]secution f ! words 9 ,luke #ad3bc--8;con/ra9 !m to come 940 ,! ,inquisition 0 ju/ifi$ by ,mat4 #ac3cj--8;b9d !m 9 bundles to burn !m40 ,innoc5t ,,iii d5i$ ! ,scriptures to ! laity1 quot+ ,heb4 #ab3bj--8;,if ev5 a bea/ t\* ! m\nta91 x %all be /on$40 ,a ,plym\? ,bro!r held t he w\ld be safe on an evangeliz+ j\rney because he read 9 ,john #ai3cf--8;,a bone ( him %all n be brok540 ,mat4 #ag3h--8!y saw no "o1 save ,jesus only0--has be5 held to mean t we %\ld tru/ only ,jesus4 ,! ,epi/le ( ,b>nabas discov]$ 9 ,abraham's #cah s]vants a pr$iction ( ! crucifi$ ,jesus1 & o!rs h se5 9 ,abraham's ?ree days' j\rney to ,m\nt ,moriah ! ?ree /ages 9 ! developm5t ( ! s\l4 ,clem5t ( ,alex&ria f9ds ! f\r natural elem5ts 9 ! f\r colors ( ! ,jewi% ,tab]nacle4 ,all ?is is to make a p>able 8run on all f\rs40 ,:ile we call a h]o a lion1 we d n ne$ to f9d 9 ! man some?+ to correspond to ! lion's mane & claws4 ,see ,toy1 ,quotations 9 ! ,n4 ,t42 ,frankl9 ,johnson1 ,quotations ( ! ,n4 ,t4 f ! ,o4 ,t42 ,crook]1 ,! ,new ,bible & its ,new ,uses1 #abf-acf4 7d7 ,:ile we d n grant t ! ,new ,te/am5t writ]s 9 any prop] s5se misquot$ or mis9t]pret$ ! ,old ,te/am5t1 we d n reg>d absolute correctness 9 ^! respects z ess5tial to _! inspiration4 ,! inspir+ ,_s may h communicat$ tru?1 & may h secur$ 9 ! ,scriptures z a :ole a record ( t tru? suffici5t = m5's moral & religi\s ne$s1 )\t imp>t+ p]fect gifts ( s*ol>%ip or exegesis4 ,9 answ] to ,toy1 ,quotations 9 ! ,n4 ,t41 :o takes a g5]ally unfavorable view ( ! correctness ( ! ,n4 ,t4 writ]s1 ,johnson1 ,quotations ( ! ,n4 ,t4 f ! ,o4 ,t41 ma9ta9s _! correctness4 ,on pages x1 xi1 ( 8 ,introduction1 ,johnson rem>ks3 8,i ?9k x j to reg>d ! writ]s ( ! ,bible z ! creators ( a great lit]ature1 & to judge & int]pret !m by ! laws ( lit]ature4 ,!y h produc$ all ! *ief =ms ( lit]ature1 z hi/ory1 biography1 anecdote1 prov]b1 oratory1 allegory1 poetry1 fiction4 ,!y h ne$$ !re=e all ! res\rces ( human spee*1 its sobriety & sci5tific precision on "o page1 its ra9b[ hues ( fancy & imag9ation on ano!r1 its fires ( passion on yet ano!r4 ,!y c\ld n h mov$ & guid$ m5 9 ! be/ mann] _h !y d5i$ !mselves ! utmo/ =ce & fre$om ( language2 _h !y refus$ to employ its wide range ( expressions1 :e!r exact or poetic2 _h !y n borr[$ )\t /9t its _m =ms ( reason1 ( t]ror1 ( rapture1 ( hope1 ( joy1 ( peace4 ,s also1 !y h ne$$ ! usual fre$om ( lit]>y allusion & citation1 9 ord] to comm5d ! gospel to ! judgm5t1 ! ta/es1 & ! feel+s ( _! read]s40 #f4 ,errors 9 ,prophecy4 7a7 ,:at are *>g$ z su* may frequ5tly be expla9$ by rememb]+ t mu* ( prophecy is yet unfulfill$4 ,x is sometimes tak5 = grant$ t ! book ( ,revelation1 = example1 ref]s entirely to ev5ts already pa/4 ,moses ,/u>t1 9 8 ,comm5t>y1 & ,w>r5's ,p>\sia1 repres5t ?is pret]i/ int]pretation4 ,?us judg$1 h[ev]1 _m ( ! pr$ictions ( ! book might seem to h fail$4 7b7 ,! p]sonal surmises ( ! prophets z to ! mean+ ( ! prophecies !y record$ may h be5 incorrect1 :ile yet ! prophecies !mselves are inspir$4 ,9 #a ,pet4 #a3aj1 #aa1 ! apo/le decl>es t ! prophets se>*$ 8:at "t or :at mann] ( "t ! ,_s ( ,*ri/ :i* 0 9 !m did po9t unto1 :5 x te/ifi$ be=eh& ! suff]+s ( ,*ri/ & ! glories t %\ld foll[ !m40 ,s ,paul1 al?\gh he does n ann\nce x z c]ta91 seems to h _h "s hope t he might live to witness ,*ri/'s second com+4 ,see #b ,cor4 #e3d--8n = t we w\ld be unclo!d1 b t we w\ld be clo!d ^u0 7--put on ! spiritual body1 z ov] ! pres5t "o1 )\t ! int]v5tion ( dea?72 #a ,!ss4 #d3ae1 #ag--8we t are alive1 t are left unto ! com+ ( ! ,"l40 ,s ,mat4 #b3ae quotes f ,hosea #aa3a--8,out ( ,egypt did ,i call my son10 & applies ! prophecy to ,*ri/1 al?\gh ,hosea 0 d\btless ?9k+ only ( ! exodus ( ! p ( ,israel4 7c7 ,! prophet's e>li] utt]ances are n to be sev]$ f ! lat] utt]ances :i* elucidate !m1 nor f ! :ole revelation ( :i* !y =m a "p4 ,x is unju/ to =bid ! prophet to expla9 8 own mean+4 #b ,!ssalonians 0 writt5 expressly to correct wrong inf]5ces z to ! apo/le's tea*+ drawn f 8 peculi> mode ( speak+ 9 ! fir/ epi/le4 ,9 #b ,!ss4 #b3b-e he removes ! impression 8t ! day ( ! ,"l is n[ pres5t0 or 8j at h&02 decl>es t 8x w n be1 except ! fall+ away come fir/1 & ! man ( s9 be reveal$02 rem9ds ! ,!ssalonians3 8:5 ,i 0 yet ) y1 ,i told y ^! ?+s40 ,yet /ill1 9 v]se #a1 he speaks ( 8! com+ ( our ,"l ,jesus ,*ri/1 & our ga!r+ toge!r unto him40 ,^! passages1 tak5 toge!r1 %[3 7#a7 t ! two epi/les are "o 9 _! tea*+2 7#b7 t 9 nei!r epi/le is !re any pr$iction ( ! imm$iate com+ ( ! ,"l2 7#c7 t 9 ! second epi/le great ev5ts are =etold z int]v5+ be=e t com+2 7#d7 t :ile ,paul nev] taught t ,*ri/ w\ld come dur+ 8 own lifetime1 he hop$ at lea/ dur+ ! e>li] "p ( 8 life t x might be s--a hope t seems to h be5 dissipat$ 9 8 lat] ye>s4 7,see #b ,tim4 #d3f--8;,i am already be+ (f]$1 & ! "t ( my dep>ture is come407 ,we mu/ rememb]1 h[ev]1 t !re 0 a 8com+ ( ! ,"l0 9 ! de/ruction ( ,j]usalem )9 ?ree or f\r ye>s ( ,paul's dea?4 ,h5ry ,van ,dyke3 8,! po9t ( ,paul's tea*+ 9 #a & #b ,!ss4 is n t ,*ri/ is com+ to-morr[1 b t he is surely com+40 ,! abs5ce ( p]spective 9 prophecy may expla9 ,paul's n at fir/ def9+ ! precise "t ( ! end1 & s leav+ x to be misund]/ood4 ,! second ,epi/le to ! ,!ssalonians1 !re=e1 only makes m pla9 ! mean+ ( ! fir/1 & adds new items ( pr$iction4 ,x is important to recognize 9 ,paul's epi/les a progress 9 prophecy1 9 doctr9e1 9 *ur* polity4 ,! full /atem5t ( ! tru? 0 gradually drawn out1 "u ! influ5ce ( ! ,_s1 ^u occasion ( successive outw>d dem&s & inw>d exp]i5ces4 ,mu* is to be le>n$ by /udy+ ! *ronological ord] ( ,paul's epi/les1 z well z ( ! o!r ,n4 ,t4 books4 ,= evid5ce ( simil> progress 9 ! epi/les ( ,pet]1 comp>e #a ,pet4 #d3g ) #b ,pet4 #c3d sq4 7d7 ,! "* ( prophecy z a r\gh g5]al sket* ( ! future1 9 highly figurative language1 & )\t hi/orical p]spective1 r5d]s x peculi>ly probable t :at at fir/ sight seem to be errors are due to a mis9t]pretation on our "p1 :i* conf\nds ! drap]y ) ! sub/ance1 or applies its language to ev5ts to :i* x _h no ref]5ce4 ,james #e3i & ,phil4 #d3e are in/ances ( t l>ge prophetic spee* :i* reg>ds ! di/ant future z ne> at h&1 because s c]ta9 to ! fai? & hope ( ! *ur*4 ,s&ay1 ,inspiration1 #cgf-cgh--8,no d\bt ! ,*ri/ians ( ! ,apo/olic age did live 9 imm$iate expectation ( ! ,second ,com+1 & t expectation culm9at$ at ! crisis 9 :i* ! ,apocalypse 0 writt54 ,9 ! ,apocalypse1 z 9 e pr$ictive prophecy1 !re is a d\ble elem5t1 "o "p d]iv$ f ! circum/ances ( ! pres5t & ano!r po9t+ =w>ds to ! future4444 ,all ^! ?+s1 9 an exact & lit]al s5se h fall5 ?r\gh ) ! po/ponem5t ( t great ev5t 9 :i* !y c5tre4 ,f ! fir/ !y 7 b meant z ! imag9ative pictorial & symbolical clo?+ ( t ev5t4 ,:at measure ( real fulfilm5t ! ,apocalypse may yet be de/9$ to receive we _c tell4 ,b 9 pr$ictive prophecy1 ev5 :5 mo/ closely v]ifi$1 ! ess5ce lies less 9 ! pr$iction ?an 9 ! et]nal laws ( moral & religi\s tru? :i* ! fact pr$ict$ reveals or exemplifies40 ,?us we recognize bo? ! div9ity & ! fre$om ( prophecy1 & reject ! rationali/ic !ory :i* w\ld relate ! fall ( ! ,beaconsfield gov]nm5t 9 ,mat!w's way3 8,t x might be fulfill$ :i* 0 spok5 by ,cromwell1 say+3 #8,get y gone1 & make room = hone/ m56' 0 ,see ! m full /atem5t ( ! nature ( prophecy1 on pages #acb-ada4 ,also ,b]n>d1 ,progress ( ,doctr9e 9 ! ,n4 ,t4 #g4 ,c]ta9 books unwor?y ( a place 9 inspir$ ,scripture4 7a7 ,?is *>ge may be %[n1 9 ea* s+le case1 to re/ ^u a misappreh5sion ( ! aim & me?od ( ! book1 & its connection ) ! rema9d] ( ! ,bible1 toge!r ) a n>r[ness ( nature or ( doctr9al view1 :i* prev5ts ! critic f appreciat+ ! wants ( ! peculi> class ( m5 to :i* ! book is especially s]viceable4 ,lu!r call$ ,james 8a "r /rawy epi/le40 ,8 con/ant pond]+ ( ! doctr9e ( ju/ification by fai? alone made x difficult = him to grasp ! complem5t>y tru? t we are ju/ifi$ only by su* fai? z br+s =? good works1 or to p]ceive ! ess5tial agreem5t ( ,james & ,paul4 ,pr(4 ,r4 ,e4 ,?ompson1 9 ,s4 ,s4 ,times1 ,dec4 #c1ahih3hjc1 #hjd--8,lu!r refus$ canonical au?ority to books n actually writt5 by apo/les or compos$ 7z ,m>k & ,luke7 "u _! direction4 ,s he reject$ f ! rank ( canonical au?ority ,hebrews1 ,james1 ,jude1 #b ,pet]1 ,revelation4 ,ev5 ,calv9 d\bt$ ! ,petr9e au?or%ip ( #b ,pet]1 exclud$ ! book ( ,revelation f ! ,scripture on :i* he wrote ,comm5t>ies1 & also ?us ignor$ #b & #c ,john40 ,g4 ,p4 ,fi%] 9 ,s4 ,s4 ,times1 ,aug4 #bi1 #ahia--8,lu!r1 9 8 preface to ! ,n4 ,t4 7,edition ( #aebb71 gives a li/ ( :at he consid]s z ! pr9cipal books ( ! ,n4 ,t4 ,^! are ,john's ,gospel & ,fir/ ,epi/le1 ,paul's ,epi/les1 especially ,romans & ,galatians1 & ,pet]'s ,fir/ ,epi/le4 ,!n he adds t #8,/4 ,james' ,epi/le is a "r /rawy ,epi/le comp>$ ) !m'--#8e9 re*t /roh]n ,epi/el geg5 sie1' ?us *>act]iz+ x n absolutely b only relatively40 ,zw+le ev5 said ( ! ,apocalypse3 8,x is n a ,biblical book40 ,s ,?omas ,arnold1 ) 8 exagg]at$ love = hi/orical accuracy & def9ite outl9e1 f\nd ! ,ori5tal imag]y & sweep+ visions ( ! book ( ,revelation s biz>re & di/a/eful t he d\bt$ _! div9e au?ority4 7b7 ,! te/imony ( *ur* hi/ory & g5]al ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce to ! pr(itabl5ess & div9ity ( ! disput$ books is ( great] weight ?an ! p]sonal impressions ( ! few :o criticize !m4 ,in/ance ! te/imonies ( ! ages ( p]secution to ! wor? ( ! prophecies1 :i* assure ,god's p t 8 cause %all surely triumph4 ,d5ney1 ,/udies 9 ,!ology1 #bbf--8;,x is at lea/ z likely t ! individual %\ld be ins5sible to ! div9e message 9 a book1 z t ! *ur* %\ld h judg$ x to conta9 su* a message if x did n d s40 ,milton1 ,areopagitica3 8,! ,bible br+s 9 holie/ m5 passionately murmur+ aga9/ ,provid5ce ?r\gh all ! argum5ts ( ,epicurus40 ,bruce1 ,apologetics1 #cbi--8,o4 ,t4 religion 0 qu]ul\s1 v9dictive1 philolevitical1 ho/ile t[>d =eign]s1 morbidly self-consci\s1 & t5d+ to self-righte\sness4 ,ecclesia/es %[s u h[ we ought n to feel4 ,to g ab\t cry+ ,vanitas6 is to miss ! lesson x 0 meant to tea*1 namely1 t ! ,old ,cov5ant 0 vanity--prov$ to be vanity by all[+ a son ( ! ,cov5ant to get into s despair+ a mood40 ,*adwick says t ,ecclesia/es got into ! ,canon only aft] x _h receiv$ an or?odox po/script4 ,pfleid]]1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #a3aic--8,slavi% fe> & self-righte\s reckon+ ) ,god are ! unlovely features ( ?is ,jewi% religion ( law to :i* ! e?ical idealism ( ! prophets _h deg5]at$1 & ^! traits /rike u mo/ visibly 9 ,ph>siaism4444 ,x 0 ?is side ( ! ,o4 ,t4 religion to :i* ,*ri/ianity took a critical & de/roy+ attitude1 :ile x reveal$ a new & high] k ( ,god4 ,=1 says ,paul1 #8ye receiv$ n ! _s ( bondage aga9 unto fe>2 b ye receiv$ ! _s ( adoption' 7,rom4 #h3ae74 ,9 unity ) ,god man does n lose 8 s\l b pres]ves x4 ,god n only comm&s b gives40 ,ian ,macl>5 7,john ,watson71 ,cure ( ,s\ls1 #add--8,:5 ! book ( ,ecclesia/es is ref]r$ to ! days ( ! ?ird c5tury ,b4 ,c41 !n its note is caught1 & any man :o has be5 wrong$ & embitt]$ by political tyranny & social corruption has 8 bitt] cry includ$ 9 ! book ( ,god40 7c7 ,su* te/imony c be adduc$ 9 favor ( ! value ( ea* "o ( ! books to :i* exception is tak51 su* z ,e/h]1 ,job1 ,song ( ,solomon1 ,ecclesia/es1 ,jonah1 ,james1 ,revelation4 ,e/h] is ! book1 next to ! ,p5tateu*1 held 9 highe/ rev]5ce by ! ,jews4 8,job 0 ! discov]] ( inf9ity1 & ! fir/ to see ! be>+ ( inf9ity on righte\sness4 ,x 0 ! return ( religion to nature4 ,job he>d ! voice beyond ! ,s9ai-voice0 7,%ad[-,cross1 #hi74 ,+e1 ,*ri/ian ,my/icism1 #dc--8;,z to ! ,song ( ,solomon1 its influ5ce ^u ,*ri/ian ,my/icism has be5 simply deplorable4 ,a graceful romance 9 honor ( true love has be5 di/ort$ into a prec$5t & sanction = giv+ way to hy/]ical emotions 9 :i* sexual imag]y has be5 freely us$ to symbolize ! relation betwe5 ! s\l & its ,"l40 ,*adwick says t ! ,song ( ,solomon got into ! ,canon only aft] x _h receiv$ an allegorical int]pretation4 ,gladd51 ,sev5 ,puzzl+ ,bible ,books1 #afe1 ?9ks x impossible t 8! addition ( "o m inmate to ! h>em ( t royal rake1 ,k+ ,solomon1 %\ld h be5 made ! type ( ! spiritual affection betwe5 ,*ri/ & 8 *ur*4 ,in/ead ( ?is1 ! book is a glorification ( pure love4 ,! ,%ulamite1 transport$ to ! c\rt ( ,solomon1 rema9s fai?ful to h] %eph]d lov]1 & is re/or$ to him40 ,bruce1 ,apologetics1 #cba--8,! ,song ( ,solomon1 lit]ally int]pret$ z a /ory ( true love1 pro( aga9/ ! bl&i%m5ts ( ! royal h>em1 is rightfully 9 ! ,canon z a buttress to ! true religion2 = :atev] made = purity 9 ! relations ( ! sexes made = ! wor%ip ( ,jehovah--,baal wor%ip & impurity be+ closely associat$40 ,ru!r=d1 ,mc,cheyne1 & ,spurgeon h tak5 m texts f ! ,song ( ,solomon ?an f any o!r portion ( ,scripture ( l ext5t4 ,*>les ,g4 ,f9ney1 ,autobiography1 #cgh--8;,at ?is "t x seem$ z if my s\l 0 w$d$ to ,*ri/ 9 a s5se :i* ,i nev] _h any ?\ght or conception ( be=e4 ,! language ( ! ,song ( ,solomon 0 z natural to me z my brea?4 ,i ?\ght ,i c\ld und]/& well ! /ate he 0 9 :5 he wrote t ,song1 & conclud$ !n1 z ,i h ev] ?\ght s9ce1 t t ,song 0 writt5 by him aft] he _h be5 reclaim$ f 8 great backslid+4 ,i n only _h all ! fulness ( my fir/ love1 b a va/ accession to x4 ,inde$1 ! ,"l lift$ me up s mu* above any?+ t ,i _h exp]i5c$ be=e1 & taught me s mu* ( ! mean+ ( ! ,bible1 ( ,*ri/'s relations & p[] & will+ness1 t ,i f\nd myself say+ to him3 ,i _h n kn[n or conceiv$ t any su* ?+ 0 true40 ,on ,jonah1 see ,r4 ,w4 ,dale1 9 ,expositor1 ,july1 #ahib1 advocat+ ! non-hi/orical & allegorical "* ( ! book4 ,bib4 ,sac41 #aj3gcg-gfd--8;,jonah repres5ts ! nation ( ,israel z em]g+ ?r\gh a miracle f ! exile1 9 ord] to c>ry out its mission to ! _w at l>ge4 ,x tea*es t ,god is ! ,god ( ! :ole e>?2 t ! ,n9evites z well z ! ,israelites are de> to him2 t 8 ?reat5+s ( p5alty are conditional40 #h4 ,portions ( ! ,scripture books writt5 by o!rs ?an ! p]sons to :om !y are ascrib$4 ,! objection re/s ^u a misund]/&+ ( ! nature & object ( inspiration4 ,x may be remov$ by consid]+ t 7a7 ,9 ! case ( books made up f prexi/+ docum5ts1 inspiration simply pres]v$ ! compil]s ( !m f select+ inadequate or improp] mat]ial4 ,! fact ( su* compilation does n impugn _! value z records ( a div9e revelation1 s9ce ^! books supplem5t ea* o!r's defici5cies & toge!r are suffici5t = man's religi\s ne$s4 ,luke di/9ctly in=ms u t he secur$ ! mat]ials = 8 gospel f ! reports ( o!rs :o 7 eye-witnesses ( ! ev5ts he record$ 7,luke #a3a-d74 ,! book ( ,g5esis be>s m>ks ( hav+ incorporat$ docum5ts ( e>li] times4 ,! acc\nt ( creation :i* beg9s ) ,g54 #b3d is evid5tly writt5 by a diff]5t h& f t :i* p5n$ #a3a-ca & #b3a-c4 ,in/ances ( ! same sort may be f\nd 9 ! books ( ,*ronicles4 ,9 l mann]1 ,m>%all's ,life ( ,wa%+ton incorporates docum5ts by o!r writ]s4 ,by ?us incorporat+ !m1 ,m>%all v\*es = _! tru?4 ,see ,bible ,com41 #a3b1 #bb4 ,dorn]1 ,hi/4 ,prot4 ,!ology1 #a3bdc--8,lu!r ascribes to fai? critical au?ority ) ref]5ce to ! ,canon4 ,he d5ies ! canonicity ( ,james1 )\t reg>d+ x z spuri\s4 ,s ( ,hebrews & ,revelation1 ?\gh lat]1 9 #aede1 he pass$ a m favorable judgm5t ^u ! latt]4 ,he ev5 says ( a pro( adduc$ by ,paul 9 ,galatians t x is too weak to hold4 ,he all[s t 9 ext]nal matt]s n only ,/eph5 b ev5 ! sacr$ au?ors conta9 inaccuracies4 ,! au?ority ( ! ,o4 ,t4 does n seem to him invalidat$ by ! admission t sev]al ( its writ+s h pass$ ?r\gh revis+ h&s4 ,:at w\ld x matt]1 he asks1 if ,moses did n write ! ,p5tateu*8 ,! prophets /udi$ ,moses & "o ano!r4 ,if !y built 9 mu* wood1 hay & /ubble along ) ! re/1 /ill ! f\ndation abides2 ! fire ( ! great day %all consume ! =m]2 = 9 ?is mann] d we treat ! writ+s ( ,augu/9e & o!rs4 ,k+s is f> m to be believ$ ?an ,*ronicles4 ,ecclesia/es is =g$ & _c come f ,solomon4 ,e/h] is n canonical4 ,! *ur* may h err$ 9 adopt+ a book into ! ,canon4 ,fai? fir/ requires pro(4 ,h5ce he ejects ! ,apocryphal books ( ! ,o4 ,t4 f ! ,canon4 ,s "s p>ts ( ! ,n4 ,t4 receive only a second>y1 deut]ocanonical position4 ,!re is a diff]5ce betwe5 ! ^w ( ,god & ! holy ,scriptures1 n m]ely 9 ref]5ce to ! =m1 b also 9 ref]5ce to ! subject matt]40 ,h4 ,p4 ,smi?1 ,bib4 ,s*ol>%ip & ,inspiration1 #id--8,! ,editor ( ! ,m9or ,prophets unit$ 9 "o roll ! prophetic fragm5ts :i* 7 9 circulation 9 8 "t4 ,f9d+ a fragm5t )\t an au?or's "n he ins]t$ x 9 ! s]ies4 ,x w\ld n h be5 di/+ui%$ f ! "w ( ! au?or imm$iately prec$+4 ,s ,ze*4 #i3a-d came to g "u ! "n ( ,ze*>iah1 & ,is4 #dj-ff "u ! "n ( ,isaiah4 ,reuss call$ ^! #8anatomical /udies4' 0 ,on ! au?or%ip ( ! book ( ,daniel1 see ,w4 ,c4 ,wilk9son1 9 ,homiletical ,review1 ,m>*1 #aijb3bjh1 & ,oct4 #aijb3cje2 on ,paul1 see ,hom4 ,rev41 ,june1 #aijb3eja2 on #aaj? ,psalm1 ,hom4 ,rev41 ,april1 #aijb3cji4 7b7 ,9 ! case ( additions to ,scripture books by lat] writ]s1 x is reasonable to suppose t ! additions1 z well z ! orig9als1 7 made by inspiration1 & no ess5tial tru? is sacrific$ by all[+ ! :ole to g "u ! "n ( ! *ief au?or4 ,m>k #af3i-bj appe>s to h be5 add$ by a lat] h& 7see ,engli% ,revis$ ,v]sion74 ,! ,eng4 ,rev4 ,v]s4 also brackets or segregates a "p ( v]se #c & ! :ole ( v]se #d 9 ,john #e 7! mov+ ( ! wat] by ! angel71 & ! :ole passage ,john #g3ec-h3aa 7! woman tak5 9 adult]y74 ,we/cott & ,hort reg>d ! latt] passage z an int]polation1 probably 8,we/]n0 9 its orig9 7s also ,m>k #af3i-bj74 ,o!rs reg>d x z au!ntic1 ?\gh n writt5 by ,john4 ,! clos+ *apt] ( ,deut]onomy 0 app>5tly add$ aft] ,moses' dea?--p]haps by ,jo%ua4 ,if criticism %\ld prove o!r portions ( ! ,p5tateu* to h be5 compos$ aft] ,moses' "t1 ! inspiration ( ! ,p5tateu* w\ld n be invalidat$1 s long z ,moses 0 its *ief au?or or ev5 ! orig9al s\rce & f\nd] ( its legislation 7,john #e3df--8;he wrote ( me074 ,gore1 9 ,lux ,mundi1 #cee--8;,deut]onomy may be a republication ( ! law1 9 ! _s & p[] ( ,moses1 & put dramatically into 8 m\?40 ,at a spot ne> ! ,pool ( ,siloam1 ,manasseh is said to h ord]$ t ,isaiah %\ld be sawn asund] ) a wood5 saw4 ,! prophet is aga9 sawn asund] by ! rec5t criticism4 ,b 8 prophecy op5s 7,is4 #a3a7 ) ! /atem5t t x 0 compos$ dur+ a p]iod :i* cov]$ ! reigns ( f\r k+s--,uzziah1 ,jo?am1 ,ahaz & ,hezekiah--ne>ly =ty ye>s4 ,9 s long a "t ! /yle ( a writ] greatly *anges4 ,*apt]s #dj-ff may h be5 writt5 9 ,isaiah's lat] age1 aft] he _h retir$ f public life4 ,comp>e ! *ange 9 ! /yle ( ,ze*>iah1 ,john & ,paul1 ) t 9 ,?omas ,c>lyle & ,george ,william ,curtis4 ,on ,isaiah1 see ,smy?1 ,prophecy a ,prep>ation = ,*ri/2 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,apr4 #ahha3bcj-bec2 also ,july1 #ahha2 ,/anley1 ,jewi% ,*41 #b3fdf1 #fdg2 ,ngelsba*1 ,int4 to ,lange's ,isaiah4 ,= ! view t !re 7 two ,isaiahs1 see ,george ,adam ,smi?1 ,com4 on ,isaiah1 #b3a-be3 ,isaiah fl\ri%$ ,b4 ,c4 #gdj-gjj4 ,! la/ #bg *apt]s deal ) ! captivity 7#eih-ech7 & ) ,cyrus 7#eej71 :om !y "n4 ,! book is n "o cont9u\s prophecy1 b a numb] ( sep>ate orations4 ,"s ( ^! claim to be ,isaiah's own1 & h titles1 su* z 8,! vision ( ,isaiah ! son ( ,amos0 7#a3a72 8,! ^w t ,isaiah ! son ( ,amos saw0 7#b3a74 ,b su* titles describe only ! individual prophecies !y head4 ,o!r portions ( ! book1 on o!r subjects & 9 diff]5t /yles1 h no titles at all4 ,*apt]s #dj-ff d n claim to be 84 ,!re are n9e citations 9 ! ,n4 ,t4 f ! disput$ *apt]s1 b none by our ,"l4 ,none ( ^! citations 7 giv5 9 answ] to ! "q3 ,did ,isaiah write *apt]s #dd-ff8 ,isaiah's "n is m5tion$ only = ! sake ( ref]5ce4 ,*apt]s #dd-ff set =? ! exile & captivity z already hav+ tak5 place4 ,israel is address$ z ready = deliv]ance4 ,cyrus is nam$ z deliv]]4 ,!re is no gramm> ( ! future l ,j]emiah's4 ,cyrus is po9t$ out z pro( t =m] prophecies ( deliv]ance are at la/ com+ to pass4 ,he is n pres5t$ z a pr$iction1 b z a pro( t pr$iction is be+ fulfill$4 ,! prophet c\ld n h ref]r$ ! hea!n to ,cyrus z pro( t prophecy _h be5 fulfill$1 _h he n be5 visible to !m 9 all 8 weight ( w>4 ,babylon has /ill to fall be=e ! exiles c g free4 ,b *apt]s #dj-ff speak ( ! com+ ( ,cyrus z pa/1 & ( ! fall ( ,babylon z yet to come4 ,:y n use ! prophetic p]fect ( bo?1 if bo? 7 yet future8 ,local color1 language & ?\ght are all consi/5t ) exilic au?or%ip4 ,all suits ! exile1 b all is =eign to ! subjects & me?ods ( ,isaiah1 = example1 ! use ( ! t]ms righte\s & righte\sness4 ,calv9 admits exilic au?or%ip 7on ,is4 #ee3c74 ,! passage #ef3i-eg1 h[ev]1 is an exception & is prexilic4 #dj-dh are c]ta9ly by "o h&1 & may be dat$ #eee-ech4 #bnd ,isaiah is n a unity1 b consi/s ( a numb] ( pieces writt5 be=e1 dur+1 & aft] ! exile1 to com=t ! p ( ,god4 7c7 ,x is unju/ to d5y to inspir$ ,scripture ! "r ex]cis$ by all hi/orians ( introduc+ c]ta9 docum5ts & say+s z simply hi/orical1 :ile _! complete tru?fulness is nei!r v\*$ = nor d5i$4 ,an in/ance 9 po9t is ! lett] ( ,claudius ,lysias 9 ,acts #bc3bf-cj--;a lett] :i* repres5ts 8 conduct 9 a m favorable light ?an ! facts w\ld ju/ify--= he _h n le>n$ t ,paul 0 a ,roman :5 he rescu$ him 9 ! temple 7,acts #ba3ca-cc2 #bb3bf-bi74 ,an incorrect /atem5t may be correctly report$4 ,a set ( pamphlets pr9t$ 9 ! "t ( ! ,fr5* ,revolution might be made an app5dix to "s hi/ory ( ,france )\t imply+ t ! hi/orian v\*$ = _! tru?4 ,! sacr$ hi/orians may simil>ly h be5 inspir$ to use only ! mat]ial )9 _! rea*1 leav+ _! read]s by comp>ison ) o!r ,scriptures to judge ( its tru?fulness & value4 ,?is seems to h be5 ! me?od adopt$ by ! compil] ( #a & #b ,*ronicles4 ,! moral & religi\s lessons ( ! hi/ory are pat5t1 ev5 ?\gh !re is inaccuracy 9 report+ "s ( ! facts4 ,s ! ass]tions ( ! au?ors ( ! ,psalms _c be tak5 = absolute tru?4 ,! au?ors 7 n s9less models = ! ,*ri/ian1--only ,*ri/ is t4 ,b ! ,psalms pres5t u ) a record ( ! actual exp]i5ce ( believ]s 9 ! pa/4 ,x has its human weakness1 b we c pr(it by x1 ev5 ?\gh x expresses itself at times 9 imprecations4 ,j]emiah #bj3g--8,o "l1 ?\ ha/ deceiv$ me0--may possibly be ?us expla9$4 #i4 ,sceptical or fictiti\s ,n>ratives4 7a7 ,descriptions ( human exp]i5ce may be embrac$ 9 ,scripture1 n z models = imitation1 b z illu/rations ( ! d\bts1 /ruggles1 & ne$s ( ! s\l4 ,9 ^! cases inspiration may v\*1 n = ! correctness ( ! views express$ by ^? :o ?us describe _! m5tal hi/ory1 b only = ! correspond5ce ( ! description ) actual fact1 & = its usefulness z indirectly tea*+ important moral lessons4 ,! book ( ,ecclesia/es1 = example1 is ! record ( ! m5tal /ruggles ( a s\l seek+ satisfaction )\t ,god4 ,if writt5 by ,solomon dur+ ! "t ( 8 religi\s decl5sion1 or ne> ! close ( x1 x w\ld con/itute a mo/ valuable comm5t>y ^u ! inspir$ hi/ory4 ,yet x might be equally valuable1 ?\gh compos$ by "s lat] writ] "u div9e direction & inspiration4 ,h4 ,p4 ,smi?1 ,bib4 ,s*ol>%ip & ,inspiration1 #ig--8,to suppose ,solomon ! au?or ( ,ecclesia/es is l suppos+ ,sp5s] to h writt5 ,9 ,memoriam40 ,lu!r1 ,keil1 ,delitzs*1 ,g9sburg1 ,h5g/5b]g all decl>e x to be a production ( lat] times 7#ccj ,b4 ,c474 ,! book %[s exp]i5ce ( misgov]nm5t4 ,an e>li] writ] _c write 9 ! /yle ( a lat] "o1 ?\gh ! lat] c imitate ! e>li]4 ,! e>ly ,lat9 & ,greek ,fa!rs quot$ ! ,apocryphal ,wisdom ( ,solomon z by ,solomon2 see ,plumptre1 ,introd4 to ,ecclesia/es1 9 ,cambridge ,bible4 ,gore1 9 ,lux ,mundi1 #cee--8;,ecclesia/es1 ?\gh l ! book ( ,wisdom purport+ to be by ,solomon1 may be by ano!r au?or4444 #8,a pi\s fraud' _c be inspir$2 an idealiz+ p]sonification1 z a normal type ( lit]ature1 c be inspir$40 ,yet ,b]nh>d ,s*f]1 ,das ,bu* ,kohele?1 ably ma9ta9s ! ,solomonic au?or%ip4 7b7 ,moral tru? may be put by ,scripture writ]s into p>abolic or dramatic =m1 & ! say+s ( ,satan & ( p]v]se m5 may =m p>ts ( su* a production4 ,9 su* cases1 inspiration may v\*1 n = ! hi/orical tru?1 mu* less = ! moral tru? ( ea* sep>ate /atem5t1 b only = ! correspond5ce ( ! :ole ) ideal fact2 9 o!r words1 inspiration may gu>antee t ! /ory is true to nature1 & is valuable z convey+ div9e in/ruction4 ,x is n necess>y to suppose t ! poetical spee*es ( ,job's fri5ds 7 actually deliv]$ 9 ! words t h come d[n to u4 ,?\gh ,job nev] _h _h a hi/orical exi/5ce1 ! book w\ld /ill be ( ! utmo/ value1 & w\ld convey to u a va/ am\nt ( true tea*+ ) reg>d to ! deal+s ( ,god & ! problem ( evil4 ,fact is local2 tru? is univ]sal4 ,"s novels conta9 m tru? ?an c be f\nd 9 "s hi/ories4 ,o!r books ( ,scripture1 h[ev]1 assure u t ,job 0 an actual hi/orical "* 7,ez4 #ad3ad2 ,james #e3aa74 ,nor is x necess>y to suppose t our ,"l1 9 tell+ ! p>able ( ! ,prodigal ,son 7,luke #ae3aa-cb7 or t ( ! ,unju/ ,/ew>d 7#af3a-h71 _h 9 m9d actual p]sons ( :om ea* p>able 0 an exact description4 ,fiction is n an unwor?y vehicle ( spiritual tru?4 ,p>able1 & ev5 fable1 may convey valuable lessons4 ,9 ,judges #i3ad1 #ae1 ! trees1 ! v9e1 ! bramble1 all talk4 ,if tru? c be transmitt$ 9 my? & leg5d1 surely ,god may make use ( ^! me?ods ( communicat+ x1 & ev5 ?\gh ,g54 #a-c 7 my?ical x might /ill be inspir$4 ,ari/otle said t poetry is tru] ?an hi/ory4 ,! latt] only tells u t c]ta9 ?+s happ5$4 ,poetry pres5ts to u ! p]man5t passions1 aspirations & de$s ( m5 :i* are beh9d all hi/ory & :i* make x :at x is2 see ,dewey1 ,psy*ology1 #aig4 ,?\gh ,job 7 a drama & ,jonah an apologue1 bo? might be inspir$4 ,david ,copp]field1 ! ,apology ( ,socrates1 ,fra ,lippo ,lippi1 7 n ! au?ors ( ! productions :i* be> _! names1 b ,dick5s1 ,plato & ,br[n+1 r4 ,imp]sonation is a prop] me?od 9 lit]ature4 ,! spee*es ( ,h]odotus & ,?ucydides might be analogues to ^? 9 ,deut]onomy & 9 ! ,acts1 & yet ^! la/ might be inspir$4 ,! book ( ,job c\ld n h be5 writt5 9 patri>*al times4 ,wall$ cities1 k+s1 c\rts1 lawsuits1 prisons1 /ocks1 m9+ ent]prises1 are f\nd 9 x4 ,judges are brib$ by ! ri* to decide aga9/ ! poor4 ,all ?is belongs to ! latt] ye>s ( ! ,jewi% ,k+dom4 ,is !n ! book ( ,job all a lie8 ,no m ?an ,bunyan's ,pilgrim's ,progress & ! p>able ( ! ,good ,sam>itan are all a lie4 ,! book ( ,job is a dramatic poem4 ,l ,macbe? or ! ,r+ & ! ,book1 x is f\nd$ 9 fact4 ,h4 ,p4 ,smi?1 ,biblical ,s*ol>%ip & ,inspiration1 #aja--8,! value ( ! book ( ,job lies 9 ! spectacle ( a human s\l 9 its dire/ affliction work+ ?r\gh its d\bts1 & at la/ humbly confess+ its weakness & s9fulness 9 ! pres5ce ( its ,mak]4 ,! in]rancy is n 9 ,job's words or 9 ^? ( 8 fri5ds1 b 9 ! tru? ( ! picture pres5t$4 ,if ,jehovah's words at ! end ( ! book are true1 !n ! fir/ ?irty-five *apt]s are n infallible tea*+40 ,gore1 9 ,lux ,mundi1 #cee1 sugge/s 9 a simil> mann] t ! books ( ,jonah & ( ,daniel may be dramatic compositions work$ up ^u a basis ( hi/ory4 ,george ,adam ,smi?1 9 ! ,expositors' ,bible1 tells u t ,jonah fl\ri%$ #ghj ,b4 ,c41 9 ! reign ( ,j]oboam ,,ii4 ,n9eveh fell 9 #fjf4 ,! book implies t x 0 writt5 aft] ?is 7#c3c--8,n9eveh 0 an exce$+ great city074 ,! book does n claim to be writt5 by ,jonah1 by an eye-witness1 or by a contempor>y4 ,! language has ,aramaic =ms4 ,! date is probably #cjj ,b4 ,c4 ,!re is an abs5ce ( precise data1 su* z ! s9 ( ,n9eveh1 ! j\rney ( ! prophet ?i!r1 ! place :]e he 0 ca/ out on l&1 ! "n ( ! ,assyrian k+4 ,! book illu/rates ,god's mission ( prophecy to ! ,g5tiles1 8 c>e = !m1 _! susceptibility to 8 ^w4 ,israel flies f duty1 b is deliv]$ to c>ry salvation to ! hea!n4 ,j]emiah _h repres5t$ ,israel z swall[$ up & ca/ out 7,j]4 #ea3cd1 #dd sq4--8,nebu*adnezz> ! k+ ( ,babylon ha? dev\r$ me 444 he ha?1 l a mon/]1 swall[$ me up1 he ha? fill$ 8 maw ) my delicacies2 he ha? ca/ me out4444 ,i w br+ =? out ( 8 m\? t :i* he ha? swall[$ up407 ,"s tradition ( ,jonah's proclaim+ doom to ,n9eveh may h furni%$ ! basis ( ! apologue4 ,our ,"l uses ! /ory z a m]e illu/ration1 l ! homiletic use ( ,%akespe>e's dramas4 8,z ,macbe? did10 8,z ,hamlet said10 d n commit u to ! hi/orical reality ( ,macbe? or ( ,hamlet4 ,jesus may say z to que/ions ( criticism3 8,man1 :o made me a judge or a divid] ov] y80 8,i came n to judge ! _w1 b to save ! _w0 7,luke #ab3ad2 ,john #ab3dg74 ,he _h no ?\ght ( confirm+1 or ( n confirm+1 ! hi/oric "* ( ! /ory4 ,x is h>d to conceive ! compilation ( a psalm by a man 9 ,jonah's position4 ,x is n ! pray] ( "o inside ! fi%1 b ( "o already sav$4 ,m ?an =ty ye>s ago ,presid5t ,woolsey ( ,yale conc$$ t ! book ( ,jonah 0 probably an apologue4 7c7 ,9 none ( ^! cases ought ! difficulty ( di/+ui%+ man's words f ,god's words1 or ideal tru? f actual tru?1 to prev5t our acceptance ( ! fact ( inspiration2 = 9 ?is v v>iety ( ! ,bible1 comb9$ ) ! /imulus x gives to inquiry & ! g5]al pla9ness ( its lessons1 we h ! v *>act]i/ics we %\ld expect 9 a book ^: au?or%ip 0 div9e4 ,! ,scripture is a /ream 9 :i* 8! lamb may wade & ! elephant may swim40 ,!re is ne$ bo? ( lit]>y s5se & ( spiritual insight to int]pret x4 ,?is s5se & ?is insight c be giv5 only by ! ,_s ( ,*ri/1 ! ,holy ,_s1 :o inspir$ ! v>i\s writ+s to witness ( him 9 v>i\s ways1 & :o is pres5t 9 ! _w to take ( ! ?+s ( ,*ri/ & %[ !m to u 7,mat4 #bh3bj2 ,john #af3ac1 #ad74 ,9 a subord9ate s5se ! ,holy ,_s inspires u to recognize inspiration 9 ! ,bible4 ,9 ! s5se "h sugge/$ we may ass5t to ! words ( ,dr4 ,*>les ,h4 ,p>khur/ at ! inauguration ( ,william ,adams ,br[n z ,pr(essor ( ,sy/ematic ,!ology 9 ! ,union ,!ological ,sem9>y1 ,novemb] #a1 #ahih--8,un=tunately we h condemn$ ! ^w #8inspiration' to a p>ticul> & isolat$ field ( div9e op]ation1 & x is a trespass ^u curr5t usage to employ x 9 ! full urg5cy ( its ,scriptural int5t 9 connection ) "w l y\r own or m9e4 ,b ! ^w voices a reality t lies s close to ! he>t ( ! entire ,*ri/ian matt] t we c ill af=d to relegate x to any s+le or te*nical function4 ,j z mu* to-day z back at ! fir/ beg9n+s ( ,*ri/ianity1 ^? :o w\ld decl>e ! tru?s ( ,god mu/ be inspir$ to behold ! tru?s ( ,god4444 ,! only irresi/ible p]suasiv5ess is t :i* is born ( vision1 & x is n vision to be able m]ely to describe :at "s se] has se51 ?\gh x 7 ,moses or ,paul t 0 ! se]40 #aj4 ,ackn[l$gm5t ( ! non-inspiration ( ,scripture tea*]s & _! writ+s4 ,?is *>ge re/s ma9ly ^u ! mis9t]pretation ( two p>ticul> passages3 7a7 ,acts #bc3e 78,i wi/ n1 bre?r51 t he 0 ! high prie/07 may be expla9$ ei!r z ! language ( indignant irony3 8,i w\ld n recognize su* a man z high prie/02 or1 m naturally1 an actual confession ( p]sonal ignorance & fallibility1 :i* does n affect ! inspiration ( any ( ,paul's f9al tea*+s or writ+s4 ,( a m repreh5sible sort 0 ,pet]'s dissimulation at ,antio*1 or practical disav[al ( 8 convictions by sep>at+ or )draw+ himself f ! ,g5tile ,*ri/ians 7,gal4 #b3aa-ac74 ,"h 0 no public tea*+1 b ! influ5ce ( private example4 ,b nei!r 9 ?is case1 nor 9 t m5tion$ above1 did ,god suff] ! error to be a f9al "o4 ,?r\gh ! ag5cy ( ,paul1 ! ,holy ,_s set ! matt] "r4 7b7 #a ,cor4 #g3ab1 #aj 78,i1 n ! ,"l02 8n ,i1 b ! ,"l074 ,"h ! contra/ is n betwe5 ! apo/le inspir$ & ! apo/le un9spir$1 b betwe5 ! apo/le's words & an actual say+ ( our ,"l1 z 9 ,mat4 #e3cb2 #ai3c-aj2 ,m>k #aj3aa2 ,luke #af3ah 7,/anley on ,cor9?ians74 ,! expressions may be p>aphras$3--8,) reg>d to ?is matt] no express comm& 0 giv5 by ,*ri/ be=e 8 asc5sion4 ,z "o inspir$ by ,*ri/1 h[ev]1 ,i give y my comm&40 ,mey] on #a ,cor4 #g3aj--8,paul di/+ui%es1 !re=e1 "h & 9 v]ses #ab1 #be1 n betwe5 8 own & inspir$ comm&s1 b betwe5 ^? :i* proce$$ f 8 own 7,god-inspir$7 subjectivity & ^? :i* ,*ri/ himself suppli$ by 8 objective ^w40 8,paul knew f ! liv+ voice ( tradition :at comm&s ,*ri/ _h giv5 conc]n+ divorce40 ,or if x %\ld be ma9ta9$ t ,paul "h disclaims inspiration1--a supposition contradict$ by ! foll[+ --8,i ?9k t ,i also h ! ,_s ( ,god0 7v]se #dj71--;x only proves a s+le exception to 8 inspiration1 & s9ce x is expressly m5tion$1 & m5tion$ only once1 x implies ! inspiration ( all ! re/ ( 8 writ+s4 ,we might illu/rate ,paul's me?od1 if ?is 7 ! case1 by ! c\rse ( ! ,new ,york ,h]ald :5 x 0 fir/ publi%$4 ,o!r j\rnals _h /ood by _! own mi/akes & _h nev] be5 will+ to ackn[l$ge error4 ,! ,h]ald ga9$ ! confid5ce ( ! public by correct+ e mi/ake ( its report]s4 ,! result 0 t1 :5 !re 0 no confession ( error1 ! pap] 0 reg>d$ z absolutely tru/wor?y4 ,s ,paul's "o ackn[l$gm5t ( non-inspiration might imply t 9 all o!r cases 8 words _h div9e au?ority4 ,on ,au?ority 9 ,religion1 see ,wilfr$ ,w>d1 9 ,hibb]t ,j\rnal1 ,july1 #aijc3fgg-fib4 ,,"p ,,iv4 ,,! ,,nature1 ,,decrees1 ,,& ,,works ,,( ,,god4 ,*apt] ,i4 ,! ,attributes ,( ,god4 ,9 contemplat+ ! words & acts ( ,god1 z 9 contemplat+ ! words & acts ( individual m51 we are compell$ to assign uni=m & p]man5t effects to uni=m & p]man5t causes4 ,holy acts & words1 we argue1 mu/ h _! s\rce 9 a pr9ciple ( hol9ess2 tru?ful acts & words1 9 a settl$ proclivity to tru?2 b5evol5t acts & words1 9 a b5evol5t disposition4 ,moreov]1 ^! p]man5t & uni=m s\rces ( expression & action to :i* we h appli$ ! t]ms pr9ciple1 proclivity1 disposition1 s9ce !y exi/ h>moni\sly 9 ! same p]son1 mu/ !mselves inh]e1 & f9d _! unity1 9 an und]ly+ spiritual sub/ance or reality ( :i* !y are ! insep>able *>act]i/ics & p>tial manife/ations4 ,?us we are l$ naturally f ! works to ! attributes1 & f ! attributes to ! ess5ce1 ( ,god4 ,= all practical purposes we may use ! words ess5ce1 sub/ance1 be+1 nature1 z synonym\s ) ea* o!r4 ,s1 too1 we may speak ( attribute1 quality1 *>act]i/ic1 pr9ciple1 proclivity1 disposition1 z practically "o4 ,z1 9 cogniz+ matt]1 we pass f its effects 9 s5sation to ! qualities :i* produce ! s5sations1 & !n to ! mat]ial sub/ance to :i* ! qualities belong2 & z1 9 cogniz+ m9d1 we pass f its ph5om5a 9 ?\ght & action to ! faculties & dispositions :i* give rise to ^! ph5om5a1 & !n to ! m5tal sub/ance to :i* ^! faculties & dispositions belong2 s1 9 cogniz+ ,god1 we pass f 8 words & acts to 8 qualities or attributes1 & !n to ! sub/ance or ess5ce to :i* ^! qualities or attributes belong4 ,! tea*] 9 a ,"y ,ladies' ,sem9>y describ$ sub/ance z a cu%ion1 into :i* ! attributes z p9s are /uck4 ,b p9s & cu%ion alike are sub/ance1--nei!r "o is quality4 ,! opposite error is illu/rat$ f ! exp]i5ce ( ,abraham ,l9coln on ! ,ohio ,riv]4 8,:at is ?is transc5d5talism t we he> s mu* ab\t80 ask$ ,mr4 ,l9coln4 ,! answ] came3 8,y see ^? swall[s digg+ holes 9 yond] bank8 ,well1 take away ! bank f ar\nd ^? holes1 & :at is left is transc5d5talism40 ,sub/ance is (t5 repres5t$ z be+ ?us transc5d5tal4 ,if su* repres5tations 7 correct1 metaphysics w\ld inde$ be 8t1 ( :i* ^? :o li/5 und]/& no?+1 & :i* he :o speaks does n himself und]/&10 & ! metaphysician w\ld be ! fox :o ran into ! hole & !n pull$ 9 ! hole aft] him4 ,sub/ance & attributes are correlates1--nei!r "o is possible )\t ! o!r4 ,!re is no quality t does n qualify some?+2 & !re is no ?+1 ei!r mat]ial or spiritual1 t c be kn[n or c exi/ )\t qualities to diff]5tiate x f o!r ?+s4 ,9 apply+ ! categories ( sub/ance & attribute to ,god1 we indulge 9 no m]ely curi\s speculation1 b r yield to ! necessities ( rational ?\ght & %[ h[ we mu/ ?9k ( ,god if we ?9k at all4 ,see ,%$d1 ,hi/ory ( ,doctr9e1 #a3bdj2 ,kahnis1 ,dogmatik1 #c3agb-ahh4 ,i4 ,def9ition ( ! t]m ,attributes4 ,! attributes ( ,god are ^? di/+ui%+ *>act]i/ics ( ! div9e nature :i* are insep>able f ! idea ( ,god & :i* con/itute ! basis & gr\nd = 8 v>i\s manife/ations to 8 creatures4 ,we call !m attributes1 because we are compell$ to attribute !m to ,god z fundam5tal qualities or p[]s ( 8 be+1 9 ord] to give rational acc\nt ( c]ta9 con/ant facts 9 ,god's self-revelations4 ,,ii4 ,relation ( ! div9e ,attributes to ! div9e ,ess5ce4 #a4 ,! attributes h an objective exi/5ce4 ,!y are n m]e names = human conceptions ( ,god--conceptions :i* h _! only gr\nd 9 ! imp]fection ( ! f9ite m9d4 ,!y are qualities objectively di/+ui%able f ! div9e ess5ce & f ea* o!r4 ,! nom9ali/ic notion t ,god is a be+ ( absolute simplicity1 & t 9 8 nature !re is no int]nal di/9ction ( qualities or p[]s1 t5ds directly to pan!ism2 d5ies all reality ( ! div9e p]fections2 or1 if ^! 9 any s5se /ill exi/1 precludes all k ( !m on ! "p ( f9ite be+s4 ,to say t k & p[]1 et]nity & hol9ess1 are id5tical ) ! ess5ce ( ,god & ) ea* o!r1 is to d5y t we "k ,god at all4 ,! ,scripture decl>ations ( ! possibility ( kn[+ ,god1 toge!r ) ! manife/ation ( ! di/9ct attributes ( 8 nature1 are conclusive aga9/ ?is false notion ( ! div9e simplicity4 ,ari/otle says well t !re is no su* ?+ z a sci5ce ( ! unique1 ( t :i* has no analogies or relations4 ,kn[+ is di/+ui%+2 :at we _c di/+ui% f o!r ?+s we _c "k4 ,yet a false t5d5cy to reg>d ,god z a be+ ( absolute simplicity has come d[n f m$ival s*ola/icism1 has infect$ mu* ( ! po/-re=mation !ology1 & is f\nd ev5 s rec5tly z 9 ,s*lei]ma*]1 ,ro!1 ,ol%aus51 & ,rits*l4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son def9es ! attributes z 8our me?ods ( conceiv+ ( ,god40 ,b ?is def9ition is influ5c$ by ! ,kantian doctr9e ( relativity & implies t we _c "k ,god's ess5ce1 t is1 ! ?+-9-itself1 ,god's real be+4 ,b[ne1 ,philosophy ( ,!ism1 #ada--8,?is notion ( ! div9e simplicity r$uces ,god to a rigid & lifeless />e4444 ,! ,"o is manifold )\t be+ _m40 ,! div9e simplicity is ! />t+-po9t ( ,philo3 ,god is a be+ absolutely b>e ( quality4 ,all quality 9 f9ite be+s has limitation1 & no limitation c be pr$icat$ ( ,god :o is et]nal1 un*angeable1 simple sub/ance1 free1 self-suffici5t1 bett] ?an ! good & ! beautiful4 ,to pr$icate any quality ( ,god w\ld r$uce him to ! sph]e ( f9ite exi/5ce4 ,( him we c only say t he is1 n :at he is2 see art4 by ,s*r]1 9 ,encyc4 ,brit41 #ah3gfa4 ,illu/rations ( ?is t5d5cy are f\nd 9 ,scotus ,erig5a3 8,deus nescit se quid e/1 quia non e/ quid02 & 9 ,occam3 ,! div9e attributes are di/+ui%$ nei!r sub/antially nor logically f ea* o!r or f ! div9e ess5ce2 ! only di/9ction is t ( names2 s ,g]h>d & ,qu5/$t4 ,*>nock1 ! ,puritan writ]1 id5tifies bo? k & w ) ! simple ess5ce ( ,god4 ,s*lei]ma*] makes all ! attributes to be modifications ( p[] or causality2 9 8 sy/em ,god & _w ! 8natura naturans0 & 8natura naturata0 ( ,sp9oza4 ,!re is no di/9ction ( attributes & no succession ( acts 9 ,god1 & !re=e no real p]sonality or ev5 spiritual be+2 see ,pfleid]]1 ,prot4 ,!ol4 seit ,kant1 #aaj4 ,s*lei]ma*] said3 8,my ,god is ! ,univ]se40 ,god is causative =ce4 ,et]nity1 omnisci5ce & hol9ess are simply aspects ( causality4 ,ro!1 on ! o!r h&1 makes omnisci5ce to be ! all-compreh5d+ pr9ciple ( ! div9e nature2 & ,ol%aus51 on ,john #a3a1 9 a simil> mann] attempts to prove t ! ,^w ( ,god mu/ h objective & sub/antial be+1 by assum+ t kn[+ will+2 :5ce x w\ld seem to foll[ t1 s9ce ,god wills all t he kn[s1 he mu/ w moral evil4 ,bu%nell & o!rs id5tify righte\sness 9 ,god ) b5evol5ce1 & !re=e _c see t any atonem5t ne$s to be made to ,god4 ,rits*l also holds t love is ! fundam5tal div9e attribute1 & t omnipot5ce & ev5 p]sonality are simply modifications ( love2 see ,mead1 ,rits*l's ,place 9 ! ,hi/ory ( ,doctr9e1 #h4 ,h]b]t ,sp5c] only c>ries ! pr9ciple fur!r :5 he concludes ,god to be simple unkn[able =ce4 ,b to call ,god ev]y?+ is ! same z to call him no?+4 ,) ,dorn]1 we say t 8def9ition is no limitation40 ,z we rise 9 ! scale ( creation f ! m]e jelly-sac to man1 ! homog5e\s becomes ! het]og5e\s1 !re is diff]5tiation ( functions1 complexity increases4 ,we inf] t ,god1 ! highe/ ( all1 in/ead ( be+ simple =ce1 is inf9itely complex1 t he has an inf9ite v>iety ( attributes & p[]s4 ,t5nyson1 ,palace ( ,art 7l9es omitt$ 9 ! lat] editions73 8,all nature wid5s upw>d3 ev]more ,! simpl] ess5ce l[] lies3 ,m complex is m p]fect1 own+ m ,disc\rse1 m widely wise40 ,j]4 #aj3aj--;,god is 8! liv+ ,god02 ,john #e3bf--;he 8ha? life 9 himself0--unse>*able ri*es ( positive attributes2 ,john #ag3bc--8?\ lov$/ me0--manifoldness 9 unity4 ,?is complexity 9 ,god is ! gr\nd ( bless$ness = him & ( progress = u3 #a ,tim4 #a3aa--8! bless$ ,god02 ,j]4 #i3bc1 #bd--8let him glory 9 ?is1 t he kn[e? me40 ,! complex nature ( ,god p]mits ang] at ! s9n] & compassion = him at ! same mom5t3 ,ps4 #g3aa--8;a ,god t ha? indignation e day02 ,john #c3af--8;,god s lov$ ! _w02 ,ps4 #he3aj1 #aa--8m]cy & tru? are met toge!r40 ,see ,julius ,mll]1 ,doct4 ,s91 #b3aaf sq42 ,s*weiz]1 ,glaub5slehre1 #a3bbi-bce2 ,?omasius1 ,*ri/i ,p]son und ,w]k1 #a3dc1 #ej2 ,m>t5s51 ,dogmatics1 #ia--8;,if ,god 7 ! simple ,"o1 1 ! my/ic abyss 9 :i* e =m ( det]m9ation 7 ext+ui%$1 !re w\ld be no?+ 9 ! ,unity to be kn[n40 ,h5ce 8nom9alism is incompatible ) ! idea ( revelation4 ,we tea*1 ) realism1 t ! attributes ( ,god are objective det]m9ations 9 8 revelation & z su* are root$ 9 8 inmo/ ess5ce40 #b4 ,! attributes inh]e 9 ! div9e ess5ce4 ,!y are n sep>ate exi/5ces4 ,!y are attributes ( ,god4 ,:ile we oppose ! nom9ali/ic view :i* holds !m to be m]e names ) :i*1 by ! necessity ( our ?9k+1 we clo! ! "o simple div9e ess5ce1 we ne$ equally to avoid ! opposite reali/ic extreme ( mak+ !m sep>ate p>ts ( a composite ,god4 ,we _c conceive ( attributes except z belong+ to an und]ly+ ess5ce :i* furni%es _! gr\nd ( unity4 ,9 repres5t+ ,god z a comp\nd ( attributes1 realism endang]s ! liv+ unity ( ! ,godhead4 ,notice ! analog\s necessity ( attribut+ ! prop]ties ( matt] to an und]ly+ sub/ance1 & ! ph5om5a ( ?\ght to an und]ly+ spiritual ess5ce2 else matt] is r$uc$ to m]e =ce1 & m9d1 to m]e s5sation1--9 %ort1 all ?+s are swall[$ up 9 a va/ idealism4 ,! purely reali/ic explanation ( ! attributes t5ds to l[ & poly!i/ic conceptions ( ,god4 ,! my?ology ( ,greece 0 ! result ( p]sonify+ ! div9e attributes4 ,! nom9a 7 turn$ into num9a1 z ,max ,mll] says2 see ,taylor1 ,nature on ! ,basis ( ,realism1 #bic4 ,in/ance also ,*ri/mas ,evans's s]mon describ+ a ,c\ncil 9 ! ,godhead1 9 :i* ! attributes ( ,ju/ice1 ,m]cy1 ,wisdom1 & ,p[] argue ) "o ano!r4 ,rob]t ,hall call$ ,*ri/mas ,evans 8! "o-ey$ orator ( ,anglesey10 b add$ t 8 "o eye c\ld 8light an army ?r\gh a wild]ness02 see ,joseph ,cross1 ,life & ,s]mons ( ,*ri/mas ,evans1 #aab-aaf2 ,david ,rhys ,/eph51 ,memoirs ( ,*ri/mas ,evans1 #afh-agf4 ,we mu/ rememb] t 8,realism may s exalt ! attributes t no p]sonal subject is left to con/itute ! gr\nd ( unity4 ,look+ ^u ,p]sonality z an?ropomorphism1 x falls into a worse p]sonification1 t ( omnipot5ce1 hol9ess1 b5evol5ce1 :i* are m]e bl9d ?\ghts1 unless !re is "o :o is ! ,omnipot5t1 ! ,holy1 ! ,good40 ,see ,lu?>dt1 ,comp5dium d] ,dogmatik1 #gj4 #c4 ,! attributes belong to ! div9e ess5ce z su*4 ,!y are to be di/+ui%$ f ^? o!r p[]s or relations :i* d n app]ta9 to ! div9e ess5ce univ]sally4 ,! p]sonal di/9ctions 7proprietates7 9 ! nature ( ! "o ,god are n to be d5om9at$ attributes2 = ea* ( ^! p]sonal di/9ctions belongs n to ! div9e ess5ce z su* & univ]sally1 b only to ! p>ticul> p]son ( ! ,tr9ity :o be>s its "n1 :ile on ! contr>y all ( ! attributes belong to ea* ( ! p]sons4 ,! relations :i* ,god su/a9s to ! _w 7pr$icata71 moreov]1 su* z creation1 pres]vation1 gov]nm5t1 are n to be d5om9at$ attributes2 = ^! are accid5tal1 n necess>y or insep>able f ! idea ( ,god4 ,god w\ld be ,god1 if he _h nev] creat$4 ,to make creation et]nal & necess>y is to de?rone ,god & to en?rone a fatali/ic developm5t4 ,x foll[s t ! nature ( ! attributes is to be illu/rat$1 n alone or *iefly f wisdom & hol9ess 9 man1 :i* are n insep>able f man's nature1 b r f intellect & w 9 man1 )\t :i* he w\ld cease to be man altoge!r4 ,only t is an attribute1 ( :i* x c be safely said t he :o possesses x w\ld1 if depriv$ ( x1 cease to be ,god4 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3cce--8,! attribute is ! :ole ess5ce act+ 9 a c]ta9 way4 ,! c5tre ( unity is n 9 any "o attribute1 b 9 ! ess5ce4444 ,! diff]5ce betwe5 ! div9e attribute & ! div9e p]son is1 t ! p]son is a mode ( ! exi/5ce ( ! ess5ce1 :ile ! attribute is a mode ei!r ( ! relation1 or ( ! op]ation1 ( ! ess5ce40 #d4 ,! attributes manife/ ! div9e ess5ce4 ,! ess5ce is reveal$ only ?r\gh ! attributes4 ,ap>t f its attributes x is unkn[n & unkn[able4 ,b ?\gh we c "k ,god only z he reveals to u 8 attributes1 we d1 not)/&+1 9 kn[+ ^! attributes1 "k ! be+ to :om ^! attributes belong4 ,t ?is k is p>tial does n prev5t its correspond+1 s f> z x goes1 to objective reality 9 ! nature ( ,god4 ,all ,god's revelations are1 !re=e1 revelations ( himself 9 & ?r\gh 8 attributes4 ,our aim mu/ be to det]m9e f ,god's works & words :at qualities1 dispositions1 det]m9ations1 p[]s ( 8 o!rwise unse5 & unse>*able ess5ce he has actually made kn[n to u2 or 9 o!r words1 :at are ! reveal$ attributes ( ,god4 ,john #a3ah--8,no man ha? se5 ,god at any "t2 ! only begott5 ,son1 :o is 9 ! bosom ( ! ,fa!r1 he ha? decl>$ him02 #a ,tim4 #f3af--8:om no man ha? se51 nor c see02 ,mat4 #e3h--8;,bless$ are ! pure 9 he>t3 = !y %all see ,god02 #aa3bg--8nei!r do? any man "k ! ,fa!r1 save ! ,son1 & he to :omsoev] ! ,son wille? to reveal him40 ,c4 ,a4 ,/rong3 8,kant1 n cont5t ) kn[+ ! reality 9 ! ph5om5a1 0 try+ to "k ! reality ap>t f ! ph5om5a2 he 0 seek+ to "k1 )\t fulfill+ ! conditions ( k2 9 %ort1 he wi%$ to "k )\t kn[+40 ,s ,agno/icism p]v]sely reg>ds ,god z conceal$ by 8 own manife/ation4 ,on ! contr>y1 9 kn[+ ! ph5om5a we "k ! object itself4 ,j4 ,c4 ,c4 ,cl>ke1 ,self & ! ,fa!r1 #f--8;,9 language1 z 9 nature1 !re are no v]bs )\t subjects1 b we are always hunt+ = ! n\n t has no adjective1 & ! v]b t has no subject1 & ! subject t has no v]b4 ,consci\sness is necess>ily a consci\sness ( self4 ,idealism & monism w\ld l to see all v]bs solid ) _! subjects1 & to write #8,i d' or #8,i feel' 9 ! mazes ( a monogram1 b consci\sness refuses1 & be=e x says #8,d' or #8,feel' x f9i%es say+ #8,i4' 0 ,j4 ,g4 ,holl&'s ,katr9a1 to h] lov]3 8,god is n wor%ip$ 9 8 attributes4 ,i d n love y\r attributes1 b y4 ,y\r attributes all meet me o!r:]e1 ,bl5d$ 9 o!r p]sonalities1 ,nor d ,i love nor d ,i wor%ip !m1 ,nor ^? :o be> !m4 ,e'en ! spott$ p>d ,w d>e a dang] :i* w make y pale2 ,b %all 8 c\rage /eal my he>t f y8 ,y *eat y\r consci5ce1 = y "k ,t ,i may l y\r attributes4 ,yet love n y40 ,,iii4 ,me?ods ( det]m9+ ! div9e ,attributes4 ,we h se5 t ! exi/5ce ( ,god is a fir/ tru?4 ,x is presuppos$ 9 all human ?9k+1 & is m or less consci\sly recogniz$ by all m54 ,?is intuitive k ( ,god we h se5 to be corroborat$ & explicat$ by argum5ts drawn f nature & f m9d4 ,reason leads u to a causative & p]sonal ,intellig5ce ^u :om we dep5d4 ,?is ,be+ ( indef9ite greatness we clo!1 by a necessity ( our ?9k+1 ) all ! attributes ( p]fection4 ,! two great me?ods ( det]m9+ :at ^! attributes are1 are ! ,rational & ! ,biblical4 #a4 ,! ,rational me?od4 ,?is is ?reefold3--7a7 ! via negationis1 or ! way ( negation1 :i* consi/s 9 d5y+ to ,god all imp]fections obs]v$ 9 creat$ be+s2 7b7 ! via em95ti1 or ! way ( climax1 :i* consi/s 9 attribut+ to ,god 9 inf9ite degree all ! p]fections f\nd 9 creatures2 & 7c7 ! via causalitatis1 or ! way ( causality1 :i* consi/s 9 pr$icat+ ( ,god ^? attributes :i* are requir$ 9 him to expla9 ! _w ( nature & ( m9d4 ,?is rational me?od expla9s ,god's nature f t ( 8 creation1 :]eas ! creation itself c be fully expla9$ only f ! nature ( ,god4 ,?\gh ! me?od is valuable1 x has insup]able limitations1 & its place is a subord9ate "o4 ,:ile we use x cont9ually to confirm & supplem5t results o!rwise obta9$1 our *ief means ( det]m9+ ! div9e attributes mu/ be #b4 ,! ,biblical me?od4 ,?is is simply ! inductive me?od1 appli$ to ! facts ) reg>d to ,god reveal$ 9 ! ,scriptures4 ,n[ t we h prov$ ! ,scriptures to be a revelation f ,god1 inspir$ 9 e "p1 we may prop]ly look to !m z decisive au?ority ) reg>d to ,god's attributes4 ,! rational me?od ( det]m9+ ! attributes ( ,god is sometimes said to h be5 orig9at$ by ,dionysius ! ,areopagite1 reput$ to h be5 a judge at ,a!ns at ! "t ( ,paul & to h di$ ,a4 ,d4 #ie4 ,x is m probably eclectic1 comb9+ ! results atta9$ by _m !ologians1 & apply+ ! intuitions ( p]fection & causality :i* lie at ! basis ( all religi\s ?9k+4 ,x is evid5t f our previ\s /udy ( ! argum5ts = ,god's exi/5ce1 t f nature we _c le>n ei!r ! ,tr9ity or ! m]cy ( ,god1 & t ^! defici5cies 9 our rational conclusions ) respect to ,god mu/ be suppli$1 if at all1 by revelation4 ,spurgeon1 ,autobiography1 #aff--8,! old say+ is ',g f ,nature up to ,nature's ,god4' ,b x is h>d "w go+ up hill4 ,! be/ ?+ is to g f ,nature's ,god d[n to ,nature2 &1 if y once get to ,nature's ,god & believe him & love him1 x is surpris+ h[ easy x is to he> music 9 ! waves1 & songs 9 ! wild :isp]+s ( ! w9ds1 & to see ,god ev]y:]e40 ,see also ,kahnis1 ,dogmatik1 #c3aha4 ,,iv4 ,classification ( ! ,attributes4 ,! attributes may be divid$ into two great classes3 ,absolute or ,imman5t1 & ,relative or ,transitive4 ,by ,absolute or ,imman5t ,attributes1 we mean attributes :i* respect ! inn] be+ ( ,god1 :i* are involv$ 9 ,god's relations to himself1 & :i* belong to 8 nature indep5d5tly ( 8 connection ) ! univ]se4 ,by ,relative or ,transitive ,attributes1 we mean attributes :i* respect ! outw>d revelation ( ,god's be+1 :i* are involv$ 9 ,god's relations to ! creation1 & :i* are ex]cis$ 9 consequ5ce ( ! exi/5ce ( ! univ]se & its dep5d5ce ^u him4 ,"u ! head ( ,absolute or ,imman5t ,attributes1 we make a ?ree-fold division into ,spirituality1 ) ! attributes !re9 involv$1 namely1 ,life & ,p]sonality2 ,inf9ity1 ) ! attributes !re9 involv$1 namely1 ,self-exi/5ce1 ,immutability1 & ,unity2 & ,p]fection1 ) ! attributes !re9 involv$1 namely1 ,tru?1 ,love1 & ,hol9ess4 ,"u ! head ( ,relative or ,transitive ,attributes1 we make a ?ree-fold division1 accord+ to ! ord] ( _! revelation1 into ,attributes hav+ relation to ,"t & ,space1 z ,et]nity & ,imm5sity2 ,attributes hav+ relation to ,creation1 z ,omnipres5ce1 ,omnisci5ce1 & ,omnipot5ce2 & ,attributes hav+ relation to ,moral ,be+s1 z ,v]acity & ,fai?fulness1 or ,transitive ,tru?2 ,m]cy & ,goodness1 or ,transitive ,love2 & ,ju/ice & ,righte\sness1 or ,transitive ,hol9ess4 ,?is classification may be bett] und]/ood f ! foll[+ s*$ule3 #a4 ,absolute or ,imman5t ,attributes3 ,a4 ,spirituality1 involv+ 7a7 ,life1 7b7 ,p]sonality4 ,b4 ,inf9ity1 involv+ 7a7 ,self-exi/5ce1 7b7 ,immutability1 7c7 ,unity4 ,c4 ,p]fection1 involv+ 7a7 ,tru?1 7b7 ,love1 7c7 ,hol9ess4 #b4 ,relative or ,transitive ,attributes3 ,a4 ,relat$ to ,"t & ,space--7a7 ,et]nity1 7b7 ,imm5sity4 ,b4 ,relat$ to ,creation--7a7 ,omnipres5ce1 7b7 ,omnisci5ce1 7c7 ,omnipot5ce4 ,c4 ,relat$ to ,moral ,be+s--7a7 ,v]acity1 7b7 ,m]cy1 7c7 ,ju/ice4 ,x w be obs]v$1 ^u exam9ation ( ! prec$+ s*$ule1 t our classification pres5ts ,god fir/ z ,_s1 !n z ! inf9ite ,_s1 & f9ally z ! p]fect ,_s4 ,?is accords ) our def9ition ( ! t]m ,god 7see page #eb74 ,x also corresponds ) ! ord] 9 :i* ! attributes commonly pres5t !mselves to ! human m9d4 ,our fir/ ?\ght ( ,god is t ( m]e ,_s1 my/]i\s & undef9$1 ov] aga9/ our own spirits4 ,our next ?\ght is t ( ,god's greatness2 ! quantitative elem5t sugge/s itself2 8 natural attributes rise be=e u2 we recognize him z ! inf9ite ,"o4 ,f9ally comes ! qualitative elem5t2 our moral natures recognize a moral ,god2 ov] aga9/ our error1 selfi%ness & impurity1 we p]ceive 8 absolute p]fection4 ,x %\ld also be obs]v$ t ?is moral p]fection1 z x is an imman5t attribute1 involves relation ( ,god to himself4 ,tru?1 love & hol9ess1 z !y respectively imply an ex]cise 9 ,god ( intellect1 affection & w1 may be conceiv$ ( z ,god's self-kn[+1 ,god's self-lov+1 & ,god's self-will+4 ,! significance ( ?is w appe> m fully 9 ! discussion ( ! sep>ate attributes4 ,notice ! di/9ction betwe5 absolute & relative1 betwe5 imman5t & transitive1 attributes4 ,absolute exi/+ 9 no necess>y relation to ?+s outside ( ,god4 ,relative exi/+ 9 su* relation4 ,imman5t 8rema9+ )91 limit$ to1 ,god's own nature 9 _! activity & effect1 inh]5t & indwell+1 int]nal & subjective--oppos$ to eman5t or transitive40 ,transitive hav+ an object outside ( ,god himself4 ,we speak ( transitive v]bs1 & we mean v]bs t are foll[$ by an object4 ,god's transitive attributes are s call$1 because !y respect & affect ?+s & be+s outside ( ,god4 ,! aim ( ?is classification into ,absolute & ,relative ,attributes is to make pla9 ! div9e self-suffici5cy4 ,creation is n a necessity1 = !re is a 9 ,god 7,col4 #a3ai71 ev5 be=e he makes ! _w or becomes inc>nate4 ,& is n 8! fill+ mat]ial10 nor 8! vessel fill$10 b 8t :i* is complete 9 itself10 or1 9 o!r words1 8pl5itude10 8fulness10 8totality10 8abundance40 ,! :ole univ]se is b a drop ( dew ^u ! fr+e ( ,god's g>m5t1 or a brea? exhal$ f 8 m\?4 ,he c\ld create a univ]se a hundr$ times z great4 ,nature is b ! symbol ( ,god4 ,! tides ( life t ebb & fl[ on ! f> %ores ( ! univ]se are only fa9t expressions ( 8 life4 ,! ,imman5t ,attributes %[ u h[ completely matt]s ( grace are ,creation & ,r$emption1 & h[ unspeakable is ! condesc5sion ( him :o took our humanity & humbl$ himself to ! dea? ( ! ,cross4 ,ps4 #h3c1 #d--8,:5 ,i consid] ?y heav5s 444 :at is man t ?\ art m9dful ( him80 #aac3e1 #f--8,:o is l unto ,jehovah our ,god1 t ha? 8 seat on high1 t humble? himself80 ,phil4 #b3f1 #g--8,:o1 exi/+ 9 ! =m ( ,god1 444 empti$ himself1 tak+ ! =m ( a s]vant40 ,ladd1 ,!ory ( ,reality1 #fi--8;,i "k t ,i am1 because1 z ! basis ( all discrim9ations z to :at ,i am1 & z ! core ( all su* self-k1 ,i imm$iately "k myself z w0 ,s z to ! non-ego1 8t ?+s actually are is a factor 9 my k ( !m :i* spr+s f ! root ( an exp]i5ce ) myself z a w1 at once active & inhibit$1 z an ag5t & yet oppos$ by ano!r40 ,! ego & ! non-ego z well are fundam5tally & ess5tially w4 8,matt] mu/ be1 p] se1 ,=ce4 ,b ?is is 444 to be a ,w0 7#dci74 ,we "k no?+ ( ! atom ap>t f its =ce 7#ddb74 ,ladd quotes f ,g4 ,e4 ,bailey3 8,! life-pr9ciple1 v>y+ only 9 degree1 is omnipres5t4 ,!re is b "o indivisible & absolute ,omnisci5ce & ,intellig5ce1 & ?is ?rills ?r\gh e atom ( ! :ole ,cosmos0 7#ddf74 8,sci5ce has only made ! ,sub/rate ( mat]ial ?+s m & m completely self-l0 7#ddi74 ,_s is ! true & ess5tial ,be+ ( :at is call$ ,nature 7#dgb74 8,! ultimate ,be+ ( ! _w is a self-consci\s ,m9d & ,w1 :i* is ! ,gr\nd ( all objects made kn[n 9 human exp]i5ce0 7#eej74 ,on classification ( attributes1 see ,lu?>dt1 ,comp5dium1 #ga2 ,ro!1 ,dogmatik1 #ga2 ,kahnis1 ,dogmatik1 #c3afb2 ,?omasius1 ,*ri/i ,p]son und ,w]k1 #a3dg1 #eb1 #acf4 ,on ! g5]al subject1 see ,*>nock1 ,attributes2 ,bruce1 ,eig5s*aftslehre4 ,v4 ,absolute or ,imman5t ,attributes4 ,fir/ division4--,spirituality1 & attributes !re9 involv$4 ,9 call+ spirituality an attribute ( ,god1 we mean1 n t we are ju/ifi$ 9 apply+ to ! div9e nature ! adjective 8spiritual10 b t ! sub/antive 8,_s0 describes t nature 7,john #d3bd1 m>g4--8,god is _s02 ,rom4 #a3bj--8! invisible ?+s ( him02 #a ,tim4 #a3ag--8;incorruptible1 invisible02 ,col4 #a3ae--8! invisible ,god074 ,?is implies1 negatively1 t 7a7 ,god is n matt]4 ,_s is n a ref9$ =m ( matt] b an immat]ial sub/ance1 invisible1 uncomp\nd$1 inde/ructible4 7b7 ,god is n dep5d5t ^u matt]4 ,x _c be %[n t ! human m9d1 9 any o!r /ate ?an ! pres5t1 is dep5d5t = consci\sness ^u its connection ) a physical organism4 ,mu* less is x true t ,god is dep5d5t ^u ! mat]ial univ]se z 8 s5sorium4 ,god is n only _s1 b he is pure _s4 ,he is n only n matt]1 b he has no necess>y connection ) matt] 7,luke #bd3ci--8;,a _s ha? n fle% & bones1 z ye behold me hav+074 ,john gives u ! ?ree *>act]i/ic attributes ( ,god :5 he says t ,god is 8_s10 8light10 8love0 7,john #d3bd2 #a ,john #a3e2 #d3h71--n a _s1 a light1 a love4 ,le ,conte1 9 ,royce's ,conception ( ,god1 #de--8;,god is _s1 = _s is ess5tial ,life & ess5tial ,en]gy1 & ess5tial ,love1 & ess5tial ,?\ght2 9 a ^w1 ess5tial ,p]son40 ,bi$]mann1 ,dogmatik1 #fca--8;,das ,wes5 des ,gei/es als des re95 ,geg5satzes zur ,mat]ie1 i/ das re9e ,se91 das 9 si* i/1 ab] ni*t da i/40 ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy1 #b3cff--8,! subjective ,ego is always "h1 z oppos$ to all else1 :i* is v>i\sly !re4444 ,)\t local relations1 !re=e1 ! s\l is inaccessible40 ,b1 ,m>t9eau cont9ues1 8if matt] be b c5tres ( =ce1 all ! s\l ne$s may be c5tres f :i* to act40 ,romanes1 ,m9d & ,motion1 #cd--8;,because )9 ! limits ( human exp]i5ce m9d is only kn[n z associat$ ) bra91 x does n foll[ t m9d _c exi/ 9 any o!r mode40 ,la ,place swept ! heav5s ) 8 telescope1 b c\ld n f9d any:]e a ,god4 8,he might j z well10 says ,presid5t ,sawy]1 8h swept 8 kit*5 ) a broom40 ,s9ce ,god is n a mat]ial be+1 he _c be appreh5d$ by any physical means4 ,^? passages ( ,scripture :i* seem to ascribe to ,god ! possession ( bodily p>ts & organs1 z eyes & h&s1 are to be reg>d$ z an?ropomorphic & symbolic4 8,:5 ,god is spok5 ( z appe>+ to ! patri>*s & walk+ ) !m1 ! passages are to be expla9$ z ref]r+ to ,god's tempor>y manife/ations ( himself 9 human =m--manife/ations :i* prefigur$ ! f9al tab]nacl+ ( ! ,son ( ,god 9 human fle%4 ,side by side ) ^! an?ropomorphic expressions & manife/ations1 moreov]1 are specific decl>ations :i* repress any mat]ializ+ conceptions ( ,god2 z1 = example1 t heav5 is 8 ?rone & ! e>? 8 foot/ool 7,is4 #ff3a71 & t ! heav5 ( heav5s _c conta9 him 7#a ,k4 #h3bg740 ,ex4 #cc3ah-bj decl>es t man _c see ,god & live2 #a ,cor4 #b3g-af intimates t )\t ! tea*+ ( ,god's ,_s we _c "k ,god2 all ?is tea*es t ,god is above s5su\s p]ception1 9 o!r words1 t he is n a mat]ial be+4 ,! second comm& ( ! decalogue does n condemn sculpture & pa9t+1 b only ! mak+ ( images ( ,god4 ,x =bids our conceiv+ ,god aft] ! lik5ess ( a ?+1 b x does n =bid our conceiv+ ,god aft] ! lik5ess ( our inw>d self1 i4 e41 z p]sonal4 ,?is aga9 %[s t ,god is a spiritual be+4 ,imag9ation c be us$ 9 religion1 & great help c be d]iv$ f x4 ,yet we d n "k ,god by imag9ation1--imag9ation only helps u vividly to realize ! pres5ce ( ! ,god :om we already "k4 ,we may almo/ say t "s m5 h n imag9ation en\gh to be religi\s4 ,b imag9ation mu/ n lose its w+s4 ,9 its repres5tations ( ,god1 x mu/ n be conf9$ to a picture1 or a =m1 or a place4 ,humanity t5ds too mu* to re/ 9 ! mat]ial & ! s5su\s1 & we mu/ avoid all repres5tations ( ,god :i* w\ld id5tify ! ,be+ :o is wor%ip$ ) ! helps us$ 9 ord] to realize 8 pres5ce2 ,john #d3bd--8!y t wor%ip him mu/ wor%ip 9 _s & tru?40 ,an ,egyptian ,hymn to ! ,nile1 dat+ f ! #ai? dyna/y 7#ad? c5tury ,b4 ,c471 conta9s ^! words3 8,8 abode is n kn[n2 no %r9e is f\nd ) pa9t$ figures2 !re is no build+ t c conta9 him0 7,*eyne1 ,isaiah1 #b3abj74 ,! repudiation ( images among ! anci5t ,p]sians 7,h]od4 #a3aca71 z among ! ,japanese ,%9tos1 indicates ! rema9s ( a primitive spiritual religion4 ,! repres5tation ( ,jehovah ) body or =m degrades him to ! level ( hea!n gods4 ,pictures ( ! ,almighty ov] ! *ancels ( ,romani/ ca!drals conf9e ! m9d & degrade ! conception ( ! wor%ip]4 ,we may use imag9ation 9 pray]1 pictur+ ,god z a b5ignant =m hold+ out arms ( m]cy1 b we %\ld reg>d su* pictures only z scaffold+ = ! build+ ( our edifice ( wor%ip1 :ile we recognize1 ) ! ,scripture1 t ! reality wor%ip$ is immat]ial & spiritual4 ,o!rwise our idea ( ,god is br\ght d[n to ! l[ level ( man's mat]ial be+4 ,ev5 man's spiritual nature may be misrepres5t$ by physical images1 z :5 m$ival arti/s pictur$ dea?1 by pa9t+ a doll-l figure leav+ ! body at ! m\? ( ! p]son dy+4 ,! long+ = a tangible1 inc>nate ,god meets its satisfaction 9 ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,yet ev5 pictures ( ,*ri/ soon lose _! p[]4 ,lu!r said3 8,if ,i h a picture ( ,*ri/ 9 my he>t1 :y n "o ^u canvas80 ,we answ]3 ,because ! picture 9 ! he>t is capable ( *ange & improvem5t1 z we ourselves *ange & improve2 ! picture ^u canvas is fix$1 & holds to old conceptions :i* we %\ld outgr[4 ,?omas ,c>lyle3 8,m5 nev] ?9k ( pa9t+ ! face ( ,*ri/1 till !y lose ! impression ( him ^u _! he>ts40 ,sw$5borg1 9 mod]n times1 repres5ts ! view t ,god exi/s 9 ! %ape ( a man--an an?ropomorphism ( :i* ! mak+ ( idols is only a gross] & m b>b>\s =m2 see ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 ,sy/em ( ,!ology1 #i1 #aj4 ,?is is also ! doctr9e ( ,mormonism2 see ,sp5c]1 ,cate*ism ( ,latt] ,day ,sa9ts4 ,! ,mormons tea* t ,god is a man2 t he has num]\s wives by :om he peoples space ) an inf9ite numb] ( spirits4 ,*ri/ 0 a favorite son by a favorite wife1 b bir? z man 0 ! only way he c\ld come into ! enjoym5t ( real life4 ,^! spirits are all ! sons ( ,god1 b !y c realize & enjoy _! son%ip only ?r\gh bir?4 ,!y are ab\t e "o ( u plead+ to be born4 ,h5ce1 polygamy4 ,we come n[ to consid] ! positive import ( ! t]m ,_s4 ,! spirituality ( ,god involves ! two attributes ( ,life & ,p]sonality4 #a4 ,life4 ,! ,scriptures repres5t ,god z ! liv+ ,god4 ,j]4 #aj3aj--8;,he is ! liv+ ,god02 #a ,!ss4 #a3i--8turn$ unto ,god f idols1 to s]ve a liv+ & true ,god02 ,john #e3bf-8;ha? life 9 himself02 cf4 #ad3f--8;,i am 444 ! life10 & ,heb4 #g3af--8! p[] ( an endless life02 ,rev4 #aa3aa--8! ,_s ( life40 ,life is a simple idea1 & is incapable ( real def9ition4 ,we "k x1 h[ev]1 9 ourselves1 & we c p]ceive ! insuffici5cy or inconsi/5cy ( c]ta9 curr5t def9itions ( x4 ,we _c reg>d life 9 ,god z 7a7 ,m]e process1 )\t a subject2 = we _c conceive ( a div9e life )\t a ,god to live x4 ,v]sus ,lewes1 ,problems ( ,life & ,m9d1 #a3aj--8,life & m9d are processes2 nei!r is a sub/ance2 nei!r is a =ce2 444 ! "n giv5 to ! :ole gr\p ( ph5om5a becomes ! p]sonification ( ! ph5om5a1 & ! product is suppos$ to h be5 ! produc]40 ,"h we h a product )\t any produc]--a s]ies ( ph5om5a )\t any sub/ance ( :i* !y are manife/ations4 ,9 a simil> mann] we read 9 ,dewey1 ,psy*ology1 #bdg--8,self is an activity4 ,x is n some?+ :i* acts2 x is activity4444 ,x is con/itut$ by activities4444 ,?r\gh its activity ! s\l is40 ,"h x does n appe> h[ !re c be activity1 )\t any subject or be+ t is active4 ,! inconsi/5cy ( ?is view is manife/ :5 ,dewey goes on to say3 8,! activity may fur!r or develop ! self10 & :5 he speaks ( 8! organic activity ( ! self40 ,s ,dr4 ,burdon ,s&]son3 8,life is a /ate ( ceaseless *ange1--a /ate ( *ange ) p]man5ce2 liv+ matt] ev] *anges :ile x is ev] ! same40 8,plus a *ange1 plus c'e/ la mme *ose40 ,b ?is p]man5t ?+ 9 ! mid/ ( *ange is ! subject1 ! self1 ! be+1 t has life4 ,nor c we reg>d life z 7b7 ,m]e correspond5ce ) outw>d condition & environm5t2 = ?is w\ld r5d] impossible a life ( ,god be=e ! exi/5ce ( ! univ]se4 ,v]sus ,h]b]t ,sp5c]1 ,biology1 #a3ei-ga--8,life is ! def9ite comb9ation ( het]og5e\s *anges1 bo? simultane\s & successive1 9 correspond5ce ) ext]nal coxi/5ces & sequ5ces40 ,"h we h1 at be/1 a def9ition ( physical & f9ite life2 & ev5 ?is is insuffici5t1 because ! def9ition recognizes no orig9al s\rce ( activity )91 b only a p[] ( reaction 9 response to /imulus f )\t4 ,we might z well say t ! boil+ tea-kettle is alive 7,m>k ,hopk9s74 ,we f9d ?is defect also 9 ,rob]t ,br[n+'s l9es 9 ,! ,r+ & ! ,book 7,! ,pope1 #acjg73 8,o ,?\--z repres5t$ "h to me ,9 su* conception z my s\l all[s--,"u ?y measureless1 my atom-wid?6--,man's m9d1 :at is x b a convex glass ,:]e9 are ga!r$ all ! scatt]$ po9ts ,pick$ out ( ! imm5sity ( sky1 ,to reunite !re1 be our heav5 = e>?1 ,our kn[n ,unkn[n1 our ,god reveal$ to man80 ,life is some?+ m ?an a passive receptivity4 7c7 ,life is r m5tal en]gy1 or en]gy ( intellect1 affection1 & w4 ,god is ! liv+ ,god1 z hav+ 9 8 own be+ a s\rce ( be+ & activity1 bo? = himself & o!rs4 ,life means en]gy1 activity1 movem5t4 ,ari/otle3 8,life is en]gy ( m9d40 ,wordswor?1 ,excursion1 book #e3fjb--8,life is love & immortality1 ,! ,be+ "o1 & "o ! elem5t4444 ,life1 ,i repeat1 is en]gy ( love ,div9e or human40 ,pr(4 ,c4 ,l4 ,h]rick1 on ,critics ( ,e?ical ,monism1 9 ,d5ison ,qu>t]ly1 ,dec4 #ahif3bdh--8;,=ce is en]gy "u resi/ance1 or self-limit$ en]gy1 = all p>ts ( ! univ]se are d]iv$ f ! en]gy4 ,en]gy manife/+ itself "u self-condition+ or diff]5tial =ms is =ce4 ,! *ange ( pure en]gy into =ce is creation40 ,pr(4 ,h]rick quotes f ,s4 ,t4 ,col]idge1 ,anima ,poet3 8,space is ! "n = ,god2 x is ! mo/ p]fect image ( s\l--pure s\l be+ to u no?+ b unresi/$ action4 ,:5ev] action is resi/$1 limitation beg9s--& limitation is ! fir/ con/itu5t ( body2 ! m omnipres5t x is 9 a giv5 space1 ! m t space is body or matt]2 & ?us all body presupposes s\l1 inasmu* z all resi/ance presupposes action40 ,s*ell+3 8,life is ! t5d5cy to individualism40 ,if _s 9 man implies life1 _s 9 ,god implies endless & inexhau/ible life4 ,! total life ( ! univ]se is only a fa9t image ( t mov+ en]gy :i* we call ! life ( ,god4 ,dewey1 ,psy*ology1 #bec--8,! s5se ( be+ alive is mu* m vivid 9 *ildhood ?an aft]w>ds4 ,leigh ,hunt says t1 :5 he 0 a *ild1 ! sight ( c]ta9 pal+s pa9t$ r$ gave him ke5] pleasure ?an any exp]i5ce ( manhood40 ,mat!w ,arnold3 8,bliss 0 x 9 t dawn to be alive1 ,b to be "y 0 v heav540 ,! *ild's delight 9 c\ntry sc5es1 & our int5sifi$ p]ceptions 9 bra9 fev]1 %[ u by contra/ h[ %all[ & turbid is ! /ream ( our ord9>y life4 ,t5nyson1 ,two ,voices3 8',tis life1 :]e( our n]ves are scant1 ,oh life1 n dea?1 = :i* we pant2 ,m life1 & full]1 t we want40 ,t life ! ne$y human _s f9ds only 9 ! inf9ite ,god4 ,in/ead ( ,tyndall's3 8,matt] has 9 x ! promise & pot5cy ( e =m ( life10 we accept ,sir ,william ,crookes's dictum3 8,life has 9 x ! promise & pot5cy ( e =m ( matt]40 ,see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 on ,! ,liv+ ,god1 9 ,philos4 & ,religion1 #ahj-ahg4 #b4 ,p]sonality4 ,! ,scriptures repres5t ,god z a p]sonal be+4 ,by p]sonality we mean ! p[] ( self-consci\sness & ( self-det]m9ation4 ,by way ( fur!r explanation we rem>k3 7a7 ,self-consci\sness is m ?an consci\sness4 ,?is la/ ! brute may be suppos$ to possess1 s9ce ! brute is n an automaton4 ,man is di/+ui%$ f ! brute by 8 p[] to objectify self4 ,man is n only consci\s ( 8 own acts & /ates1 b by ab/raction & reflection he recognizes ! self :i* is ! subject ( ^! acts & /ates4 7b7 ,self-det]m9ation is m ?an det]m9ation4 ,! brute %[s det]m9ation1 b 8 det]m9ation is ! result ( influ5ces f )\t2 !re is no inn] spontaneity4 ,man1 by virtue ( 8 free-w1 det]m9es 8 action f )94 ,he det]m9es self 9 view ( motives1 b 8 det]m9ation is n caus$ by motives2 he himself is ! cause4 ,god1 z p]sonal1 is 9 ! highe/ degree self-consci\s & self-det]m9+4 ,! rise 9 our own m9ds ( ! idea ( ,god1 z p]sonal1 dep5ds l>gely ^u our recognition ( p]sonality 9 ourselves4 ,^? :o d5y _s 9 man place a b> 9 ! way ( ! recognition ( ?is attribute ( ,god4 ,ex4 #c3ad--8;,& ,god said unto ,moses1 ,i ,,am ,,t ,i ,,am3 & he said1 ,?us %alt ?\ say unto ! *ildr5 ( ,israel1 ,i ,,am ha? s5t me unto y40 ,god is n ! ev]la/+ 8,,x ,,is10 or 8,i ,,010 b ! ev]la/+ 8,i ,,am0 7,morris1 ,philosophy & ,*ri/ianity1 #abh72 8,i ,,am0 implies bo? p]sonality & pres5ce4 #a ,cor4 #b3aa--8! ?+s ( ,god none kn[e?1 save ! ,_s ( ,god02 ,eph4 #a3i--8;good pleasure :i* he purpos$02 #aa--8! c\nsel ( 8 w40 ,def9itions ( p]sonality are ! foll[+3 ,boe?ius--8,p]sona e/ anim rationalis individua sub/antia0 7quot$ 9 ,dorn]1 ,glaub5slehre1 #b3dae74 ,f4 ,w4 ,rob]tson1 ,g5esis #c--8,p]sonality self-consci\sness1 w1 "*40 ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #fbf--8;,di/9ct subsi/5ce1 ei!r actually or lat5tly self-consci\s & self-det]m9+40 ,h>ris1 ,philos4 ,basis ( ,!ism3 ,p]son 8be+1 consci\s ( self1 subsi/+ 9 individuality & id5tity1 & end[$ ) intuitive reason1 rational s5sibility1 & free-w40 ,see ,h>ris1 #ih1 #ii1 quotation f ,mansel--8,! fre$om ( ! w is s f> f be+1 z x is g5]ally consid]$1 a controv]tible "q 9 philosophy1 t x is ! fundam5tal po/ulate )\t :i* all action & all speculation1 philosophy 9 all its bran*es & human consci\sness itself1 w\ld be impossible40 ,"o ( ! mo/ a/\nd+ ann\ncem5ts 9 all lit]ature is t ( ,mat!w ,arnold1 9 8 8,lit]ature & ,dogma10 t ! ,hebrew ,scriptures recognize 9 ,god only 8! p[]1 n ourselves1 t makes = righte\sness0 ! ,god ( pan!ism4 ,! 8,i ,,am0 ( ,ex4 #c3ad c\ld h>dly h be5 s misund]/ood1 if ,mat!w ,arnold _h n lo/ ! s5se ( 8 own p]sonality & responsibility4 ,f free-w 9 man we rise to fre$om 9 ,god--8,t liv+ ,w t %all endure1 ,:5 all t seems %all suff] %ock40 ,obs]ve t p]sonality ne$s to be accompani$ by life--! p[] ( self-consci\sness & self-det]m9ation ne$s to be accompani$ by activity--9 ord] to make up our total idea ( ,god z ,_s4 ,only ?is p]sonality ( ,god gives prop] mean+ to 8 puni%m5ts or to 8 =giv5ess4 ,see ,bib4 ,sac41 ,april1 #ahhd3bag-bcc2 ,ei*horn1 die ,p]snli*keit ,gottes4 ,ill+wor?1 ,div9e & ,human ,p]sonality1 #a3be1 %[s t ! s5se ( p]sonality has _h a gradual gr[?2 t its pre-,*ri/ian recognition 0 imp]fect2 t its f9al def9ition has be5 due to ,*ri/ianity4 ,9 #bi-ec1 he notes ! *>act]i/ics ( p]sonality z reason1 love1 w4 ,! brute p]ceives2 only ! man app]ceives1 i4 e41 recognizes 8 p]ception z belong+ to himself4 ,9 ! ,g]man /ory1 ,dreiugle91 ! ?ree-ey$ *ild1 _h besides h] natural pair ( eyes "o o!r to see :at ! pair did1 & besides h] natural w _h an additional w to set ! fir/ to go+ "r4 ,on consci\sness & self-consci\sness1 see ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3agi-ahi--8;,9 consci\sness ! object is ano!r sub/ance ?an ! subject2 b 9 self-consci\sness ! object is ! same sub/ance z ! subject40 ,t5nyson1 9 8 ,palace ( ,art1 speaks ( 8! abysmal dep?s ( p]sonality40 ,we d n fully "k ourselves1 nor yet our relation to ,god4 ,b ! div9e consci\sness embraces ! :ole div9e cont5t ( be+3 8! ,_s se>*e? all ?+s1 yea1 ! deep ?+s ( ,god0 7#a ,cor4 #b3aj74 ,we are n fully ma/]s ( ourselves4 ,our self-det]m9ation is z limit$ z is our self-consci\sness4 ,b ! div9e w is absolutely )\t h9drance2 ,god's activity is con/ant1 int5se1 inf9ite2 ,job #bc3ac--8,:at 8 s\l desire?1 ev5 t he doe?02 ,john #e3ag--8,my ,fa!r worke? ev5 until n[1 & ,i "w40 ,self-k & self-ma/]y are ! dignity ( man2 !y are also ! dignity ( ,god2 ,t5nyson3 8,self-rev]5ce1 self-k1 self-control1 ,^! ?ree lead life to sov]eign p[]40 ,rob]t ,br[n+1 ,! ,la/ ,ride ,toge!r3 8,:at act prov$ all its ?\ght _h be58 ,:at w b felt ! fle%ly scre580 ,mob]ly1 ,atonem5t & ,p]sonality1 #f1 #afa1 #baf-bee--8,p]haps ! root ( p]sonality is capacity = affection40444 ,our p]sonality is incomplete2 we reason truly only ) ,god help+2 our love 9 high] ,love endures2 we w rightly1 only z ,god works 9 u to w & to d2 to make u truly ourselves we ne$ an inf9ite ,p]sonality to supplem5t & en]gize our own2 we are complete only 9 ,*ri/ 7,col4 #b3i1 #aj--8;,9 him dwelle? all ! fulness ( ! ,godhead bodily1 & 9 him ye are made full407 ,webb1 on ! ,idea ( ,p]sonality z appli$ to ,god1 9 ,j\r4 ,!ol4 ,/udies1 #b3ej--8,self kn[s itself & :at is n itself z two1 j because bo? alike are embrac$ )9 ! unity ( its exp]i5ce1 /& out aga9/ ?is backgr\nd1 ! appreh5sion ( :i* is ! v ess5ce ( t rationality or p]sonality :i* di/+ui%es u f ! l[] animals4 ,we f9d t backgr\nd1 ,god1 pres5t 9 u1 or r1 we f9d ourselves pres5t 9 x4 ,b if ,i f9d myself pres5t 9 x1 !n x1 z m complete1 is simply m p]sonal ?an ,i4 ,our n-self is outside ( u1 s t we are f9ite & lonely1 b ,god's n-self is )9 him1 s t !re is a mutual inw>dness ( love & insight ( :i* ! mo/ p]fect communion among m5 is only a fa9t symbol4 ,we are 'h]mit-spirits1' z ,keble says1 & we come to union ) o!rs only by realiz+ our union ) ,god4 ,p]sonality is n imp5etrable 9 man1 = #89 him we live1 & move1 & h our be+' 7,acts #ag3bh71 & #8t :i* ha? be5 made is life 9 him' 7,john #a3c1 #d740 ,palm]1 ,!ologic ,def9ition1 #ci--8,t :i* has its cause )\t itself is a ?+1 :ile t :i* has its cause )9 itself is a p]son40 ,second ,division4--,inf9ity1 & attributes !re9 involv$4 ,by inf9ity we mean1 n t ! div9e nature has no kn[n limits or b\nds1 b t x has no limits or b\nds4 ,t :i* has simply no kn[n limits is ! indef9ite4 ,! inf9ity ( ,god implies t he is 9 no way limit$ by ! univ]se or conf9$ to ! univ]se2 he is transc5d5t z well z imman5t4 ,transc5d5ce1 h[ev]1 mu/ n be conceiv$ z fre$om f m]ely spatial re/rictions1 b r z unlimit$ res\rce1 ( :i* ,god's glory is ! expression4 ,ps4 #ade3c--8;8 greatness is unse>*able02 ,job #aa3g-i--8;high z heav5 444 deep] ?an ,%eol02 ,is4 #ff3a--8;,heav5 is my ?rone1 & ! e>? is my foot/ool02 #a ,k4 #h3bg--8;,heav5 & ! heav5 ( heav5s _c conta9 !e02 ,rom4 #aa3cc--8;h[ unse>*able are 8 judgm5ts1 & 8 ways pa/ f9d+ out40 ,!re c be no inf9ite numb]1 s9ce to any assignable numb] a unit c be add$1 :i* %[s t ?is numb] 0 n inf9ite be=e4 ,!re c be no inf9ite univ]se1 because an inf9ite univ]se is conceivable only z an inf9ite numb] ( worlds or ( m9ds4 ,god himself is ! only real ,inf9ite1 & ! univ]se is b ! f9ite expression or symbol ( 8 greatness4 ,we !re=e object to ! /atem5t ( ,lotze1 ,microcosm1 #a3ddf--8,! complete sy/em1 grasp$ 9 its totality1 (f]s an expression ( ! :ole nature ( ! ,"o4444 ,! ,cause makes actual exi/5ce its complete manife/ation40 ,9 a simil> way ,s*urman1 ,belief 9 ,god1 #bf1 #agc-agh1 grants inf9ity1 b d5ies transc5d5ce3 8,! inf9ite ,_s may include ! f9ite1 z ! idea ( a s+le organism embraces )9 a s+le life a plurality ( memb]s & functions4444 ,! _w is ! expression ( an ev] active & inexhau/ible w4 ,t ! ext]nal manife/ation is z b\ndless z ! life x expresses1 sci5ce makes exce$+ly probable4 ,9 any ev5t1 we h n ! slighte/ reason to contra/ ! f9itude ( ! _w ) ! inf9ity ( ,god4444 ,if ! natural ord] is et]nal & inf9ite1 z !re seems no reason to d\bt1 x w be difficult to f9d a mean+ = #8beyond' or #8be=e4' ,( ?is illimitable1 ev]-exi/+ univ]se1 ,god is ! ,inn] gr\nd or sub/ance4 ,!re is no evid5ce1 nei!r does any religi\s ne$ require u to believe1 t ! div9e ,be+ manife/ 9 ! univ]se has any actual or possible exi/5ce else:]e1 9 "s transc5d5t sph]e4444 ,! div9e w c express itself only z x does1 because no o!r expression w\ld reveal :at x is4 ,( su* a w1 ! univ]se is ! et]nal expression40 ,9 explanation ( ! t]m inf9ity1 we may notice3 7a7 ,t inf9ity c belong to b "o ,be+1 & !re=e _c be %>$ ) ! univ]se4 ,inf9ity is n a negative b a positive idea4 ,x does n take its rise f an impot5ce ( ?\ght1 b is an intuitive conviction :i* con/itutes ! basis ( all o!r k4 ,see ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #fea1 #feb1 & ?is ,comp5dium1 pages #ei-fb4 ,v]sus ,mansel1 ,proleg4 ,logica1 *ap4 #a--8,su* negative notions 444 imply at once an attempt to ?9k1 & a failure 9 t attempt40 ,on ! contr>y1 ! conception ( ! ,inf9ite is p]fectly di/+ui%able f t ( ! f9ite1 & is bo? necess>y & logically prior to t ( ! f9ite4 ,?is is n true ( our idea ( ! univ]se1 ( :i* all we "k is f9ite & dep5d5t4 ,we !re=e reg>d su* utt]ances z ^? ( ,lotze & ,s*urman above1 & ^? ( ,*amb]l9 & ,caird bel[1 z pan!i/ic 9 t5d5cy1 al?\gh ! belief ( ^! writ]s 9 div9e & human p]sonality saves !m f fall+ into o!r errors ( pan!ism4 ,pr(4 ,t4 ,c4 ,*amb]l91 ( ! ,univ]sity ( ,*icago3 8,x is n suffici5t to ! mod]n sci5tific ?\ght to ?9k ( a ,rul] outside ( ! univ]se1 nor ( a univ]se ) ! ,rul] outside4 ,a supreme ,be+ :o does n embrace all ! activities & possibilities & pot5cies ( ! univ]se seems some?+ less ?an ! supreme/ ,be+1 & a univ]se ) a ,rul] outside seems some?+ less ?an a univ]se4 ,& !re=e ! ?\ght is gr[+ on ! m9ds ( sci5tific ?9k]s t ! supreme ,be+ is ! univ]sal ,be+1 embrac+ & compreh5d+ all ?+s40 ,caird1 ,evolution ( ,religion1 #b3fb--8,religion1 if x w\ld cont9ue to exi/1 mu/ comb9e ! mono!i/ic idea ) t :i* x has (t5 reg>d$ z its greate/ enemy1 ! _s ( pan!ism40 ,we grant 9 reply t religion mu/ appropriate ! elem5t ( tru? 9 pan!ism1 namely1 t ,god is ! only sub/ance1 gr\nd & pr9ciple ( be+1 b we reg>d x z fatal to religion to side ) pan!ism 9 its d5ials ( ,god's transc5d5ce & ( ,god's p]sonality4 7b7 ,t ! inf9ity ( ,god does n involve 8 id5tity ) 8! all10 or ! sum ( exi/5ce1 nor prev5t ! coxi/5ce ( d]iv$ & f9ite be+s to :i* he be>s relation4 ,inf9ity implies simply t ,god exi/s 9 no necess>y relation to f9ite ?+s or be+s1 & t :atev] limitation ( ! div9e nature results f _! exi/5ce is1 on ! "p ( ,god1 a self-limitation4 ,ps4 #aac3e1 #f--8t humble? himself to behold ! ?+s t are 9 heav5 & 9 ! e>?40 ,x is involv$ 9 ,god's inf9ity t !re %\ld be no b>ri]s to 8 self-limitation 9 creation & r$emption 7see page #i1 ,f474 ,jacob ,boehme said3 8,god is inf9ite1 = ,god is all40 ,b ?is is to make ,god all imp]fection1 z well z all p]fection4 ,h>ris1 ,philos4 ,basis ,!ism3 8,! relation ( ! absolute to ! f9ite is n ! ma!matical relation ( a total to its p>ts1 b x is a dynamical & rational relation40 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3ahi-aia--8,! inf9ite is n ! total2 #8! all' is a pseudo-inf9ite1 & to ass]t t x is great] ?an ! simple inf9ite is ! same error t is committ$ 9 ma!matics :5 x is ass]t$ t an inf9ite numb] plus a va/ f9ite numb] is great] ?an ! simple inf9ite40 ,full]ton1 ,conception ( ! ,inf9ite1 #ij--8,! ,inf9ite1 ?\gh x involves unlimit$ possibility ( quantity1 is n itself a quantitative b r a qualitative conception40 ,hovey1 ,/udies ( ,e?ics & ,religion1 #ci-dg--8;,any numb] ( f9ite be+s1 m9ds1 loves1 wills1 _c reveal fully an inf9ite ,be+1 ,m9d1 ,love1 ,w4 ,god mu/ be transc5d5t z well z imman5t 9 ! univ]se1 or he is nei!r inf9ite nor an object ( supreme wor%ip40 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #aag--8;,great z ! univ]se is1 ,god is n limit$ to x1 :olly absorb$ by :at he is do+ 9 x1 & capable ( do+ no?+ m4 ,god 9 ! univ]se is n l ! life ( ! tree 9 ! tree1 :i* does all t x is capable ( 9 mak+ ! tree :at x is4 ,god 9 ! univ]se is r l ! _s ( a man 9 8 body1 :i* is great] ?an 8 body1 able to direct 8 body1 & capable ( activities 9 :i* 8 body has no %>e4 ,god is a free _s1 p]sonal1 self-direct+1 unexhau/$ by 8 pres5t activities40 ,! ,p]sian poet said truly3 8,! _w is a bud f 8 b[] ( beauty2 ! sun is a sp>k f ! light ( 8 wisdom2 ! sky is a bubble on ! sea ( 8 p[]40 ,fab]3 8,= greatness :i* is inf9ite makes room ,= all ?+s 9 its lap to lie4 ,we %\ld be cru%$ by a magnific5ce ,%ort ( inf9ity4 ,we %>e 9 :at is inf9ite2 'tis ours1 ,= we & x alike are ,?9e4 ,:at ,i enjoy1 great ,god1 by "r ( ,!e1 ,is m ?an d\bly m9e40 7c7 ,t ! inf9ity ( ,god is to be conceiv$ ( z int5sive1 r ?an z ext5sive4 ,we d n attribute to ,god inf9ite ext5sion1 b r inf9ite en]gy ( spiritual life4 ,t :i* acts up to ! measure ( its p[] is simply natural & physical =ce4 ,man rises above nature by virtue ( 8 res]ves ( p[]4 ,b 9 ,god ! res]ve is inf9ite4 ,!re is a transc5d5t elem5t 9 him1 :i* no self-revelation exhau/s1 :e!r creation or r$emption1 :e!r law or promise4 ,transc5d5ce is n m]e outsid5ess1--x is r b\ndless supply )94 ,god is n inf9ite by virtue ( exi/+ 8extra flammantia mnia mundi0 7,lucretius7 or ( fill+ a space outside ( space1--he is r inf9ite by be+ ! pure & p]fect ,m9d t passes beyond all ph5om5a & con/itutes ! gr\nd ( !m4 ,! =m] conception ( inf9ity is simply supra-cosmic1 ! latt] alone is prop]ly transc5d5t2 see ,hat*1 ,hibb]t ,lectures1 #bdd4 8,god is ! liv+ ,god1 & has n yet spok5 8 la/ ^w on any subject0 7,g4 ,w4 ,nor?rup74 ,god's life 8op]ates unsp5t40 ,!re is 8ev] m to foll[40 ,! leg5d /amp$ ) ! ,pill>s ( ,h]cules ^u ! old co9s ( ,spa9 0 ,ne plus ultra--8,no?+ beyond10 b :5 ,columbus discov]$ ,am]ica ! leg5d 0 fitly *ang$ to ,plus ultra--8,m beyond40 ,s ! motto ( ! ,univ]sity ( ,ro*e/] is ,meliora--8,bett] ?+s40 ,s9ce ,god's inf9ite res\rces are pl$g$ to aid u1 we may1 z ,em]son bids u1 8hit* our wagon to a />10 & believe 9 progress4 ,t5nyson1 ,locksley ,hall3 8,m51 my bro!rs1 m5 ! work]s1 ev] reap+ some?+ new4 ,t :i* !y h done b e>ne/ ( ! ?+s t !y %all d40 ,millet's ,l',angelus is a witness to man's ne$ ( ,god's transc5d5ce4 ,millet's aim 0 to pa9t1 n air b pray]4 ,we ne$ a ,god :o is n conf9$ to nature4 ,z ,moses at ! beg9n+ ( 8 m9i/ry cri$1 8,%[ me1 ,i pray !e1 ?y glory0 7,ex4 #cc3ah71 s we ne$ m>k$ exp]i5ces at ! beg9n+ ( ! ,*ri/ian life1 9 ord] t we may be liv+ witnesses to ! sup]natural4 ,& our ,"l promises su* manife/ations ( himself3 ,john #ad3ba--8;,i w love him1 & w manife/ myself unto him40 ,ps4 #ga3ae--8,my m\? %all tell ( ?y righte\sness1 ,& ( ?y salvation all ! day2 ,= ,i "k n ! numb]s !re(0 x is inf9ite4 ,ps4 #hi3b--8,m]cy %all be built up =ev]0 ev] gr[+ manife/ations & cycles ( fulfilm5t--fir/ lit]al1 !n spiritual4 ,ps4 #aac3d-f--8;,jehovah is high above all nations1 ,& 8 glory above ! heav5s4 ,:o is l unto ,jehovah our ,god1 ,t ha? 8 seat on high1 ,t humble? himself /oope? d[n to behold ,! ?+s t are 9 heav5 & 9 ! e>?80 ,mal4 #b3ae--8;did he n make "o1 al?\gh he _h ! residue ( ! ,_s80 he might h creat$ _m wives = ,adam1 ?\gh he did actually create b "o4 ,9 ?is 8residue ( ! ,_s10 says ,caldwell1 ,cities ( our ,fai?1 #cgj1 8!re yet lies lat5t--z w9ds lie calm 9 ! air ( a summ] noon1 z heat imm5se lies cold & hidd5 9 ! m\nta9s ( coal--! bless+ & ! life ( nations1 ! inf9ite enl>gem5t ( ,zion40 ,is4 #eb3aj--8;,jehovah ha? made b>e 8 holy arm0 nature does n exhau/ or entomb ,god2 nature is ! mantle 9 :i* he commonly reveals himself2 b he is n fett]$ by ! robe he we>s--he c ?ru/ x aside1 & make b>e 8 arm 9 provid5tial int]positions = e>?ly deliv]ance1 & 9 mighty movem5ts ( hi/ory = ! salvation ( ! s9n] & = ! sett+ up ( 8 own k+dom4 ,see also ,john #a3af--8( 8 fulness we all receiv$1 & grace = grace0 8,ea* bless+ appropriat$ became ! f\ndation ( a great] bless+4 ,to h realiz$ & us$ "o measure ( grace 0 to h ga9$ a l>g] measure 9 ex*ange = x 02 s ,we/cott1 9 ,bib4 ,com41 9 loco4 ,*ri/ c ev] say to ! believ]1 z he said to ,na?anael 7,john #a3ej73 8?\ %alt see great] ?+s ?an ^!40 ,because ,god is inf9ite1 he c love ea* believ] z mu* z if t s+le s\l 7 ! only "o = :om he _h to c>e4 ,bo? 9 provid5ce & 9 r$emption ! :ole he>t ( ,god is busy ) plans = ! int]e/ & happ9ess ( ! s+le ,*ri/ian4 ,?reat5+s d n half reveal ,god1 nor 8 promises half express ! 8et]nal weight ( glory0 7#b ,cor4 #d3ag74 ,dante1 ,p>adiso1 #ai3dj-fc--;,god 8,c\ld n ^u ! univ]se s write ,! impress ( 8 p[]1 b t 8 ^w ,mu/ /ill be left 9 di/ance inf9ite40 ,to 8limit ! ,holy ,"o ( ,israel0 7,ps4 #gh3da--m>g47 is falsehood z well z s94 ,?is attribute ( inf9ity1 or ( transc5d5ce1 qualifies all ! o!r attributes1 & s is ! f\ndation = ! repres5tations ( maje/y & glory z belong+ to ,god 7see ,ex4 #cc3ah2 ,ps4 #ai3a2 ,is4 #f3c2 ,mat4 #f3ac2 ,acts #g3b2 ,rom4 #a3bc2 #i3bc2 ,heb4 #a3c2 #a ,pet4 #d3ad2 ,rev4 #ba3bc74 ,glory is n itself a div9e attribute2 x is r a result--an objective result--( ! ex]cise ( ! div9e attributes4 ,?is glory exi/s irrespective ( ! revelation & recognition ( x 9 ! creation 7,john #ag3e74 ,only ,god c wor?ily p]ceive & rev]5ce 8 own glory4 ,he does all = 8 own glory4 ,all religion is f\nd$ on ! glory ( ,god4 ,all wor%ip is ! result ( ?is imman5t quality ( ! div9e nature4 ,k$ney1 ,*ri/ian ,doctr9e1 #a3cfj-cgc1 #b3ced1 app>5tly conceives ( ! div9e glory z an et]nal mat]ial environm5t ( ,god1 f :i* ! univ]se is fa%ion$4 ,?is seems to contradict bo? ! spirituality & ! inf9ity ( ,god4 ,god's inf9ity implies absolute complet5ess ap>t f any?+ ext]nal to himself4 ,we proce$ !re=e to consid] ! attributes involv$ 9 inf9ity4 ,( ! attributes involv$ 9 ,inf9ity1 we m5tion3 #a4 ,self-exi/5ce4 ,by self-exi/5ce we mean 7a7 ,t ,god is 8causa sui10 hav+ ! gr\nd ( 8 exi/5ce 9 himself4 ,e be+ mu/ h ! gr\nd ( its exi/5ce ei!r 9 or out ( itself4 ,we h ! gr\nd ( our exi/5ce outside ( u4 ,god is n ?us dep5d5t4 ,he is a se2 h5ce we speak ( ! aseity ( ,god4 ,god's self-exi/5ce is impli$ 9 ! "n 8,jehovah0 7,ex4 #f3c7 & 9 ! decl>ation 8,i ,,am ,,t ,i ,,am0 7,ex4 #c3ad71 bo? ( :i* signify t x is ,god's nature to be4 ,self-exi/5ce is c]ta9ly incompreh5sible to u1 yet a self-exi/5t p]son is no great] my/]y ?an a self-exi/5t ?+1 su* z ,h]b]t ,sp5c] supposes ! univ]se to be2 inde$ x is n s great a my/]y1 = x is easi] to d]ive matt] f m9d ?an to d]ive m9d f matt]4 ,see ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #ffa4 ,joh4 ,angelus ,silesius3 8,gott i/ das 0 ,er i/2 ,i* 0 ,i* dur* ,ihn b92 ,do* k5n/ du ,e95 wohl1 ,s k5n/ du mi* und ,ihn40 ,m>t9eau1 ,types1 #a3cjb--8;,a cause may be et]nal1 b no?+ t is caus$ c be s40 ,he prote/s aga9/ ! phrase 8causa sui40 ,s ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3cch1 objects to ! phrase 8,god is 8 own cause10 because ,god is ! uncaus$ ,be+4 ,b :5 we speak ( ,god z 8causa sui10 we d n attribute to him beg9n+ ( exi/5ce4 ,! phrase means r t ! gr\nd ( 8 exi/5ce is n outside ( himself1 b t he himself is ! liv+ spr+ ( all en]gy & ( all be+4 ,b le/ ?is %\ld be miscon/ru$1 we add 7b7 ,t ,god exi/s by ! necessity ( 8 own be+4 ,x is 8 nature to be4 ,h5ce ! exi/5ce ( ,god is n a cont+5t b a necess>y exi/5ce4 ,x is gr\nd$1 n 9 8 volitions1 b 9 8 nature4 ,julius ,mll]1 ,doctr9e ( ,s91 #b3abf1 #acj1 #agj1 seems to hold t ,god is prim>ily w1 s t ! ess5ce ( ,god is 8 act3 8,god's ess5ce does n prec$e 8 fre$om02 8if ! ess5ce ( ,god 7 = him some?+ giv51 some?+ already pres5t1 ! "q #8f :5ce x 0 giv58' c\ld n be evad$2 ,god's ess5ce mu/ 9 ?is case h its orig9 9 some?+ ap>t f him1 & ?us ! true conception ( ,god w\ld be entirely swept away40 ,b ?is implies t tru?1 reason1 love1 hol9ess1 equally ) ,god's ess5ce1 are all products ( w4 ,if ,god's ess5ce1 moreov]1 7 8 act1 x w\ld be 9 ! p[] ( ,god to annihilate himself4 ,act presupposes ess5ce2 else !re is no ,god to act4 ,! w by :i* ,god exi/s1 & 9 virtue ( :i* he is causa sui1 is !re=e n w 9 ! s5se ( volition1 b w 9 ! s5se ( ! :ole movem5t ( 8 active be+4 ,) ,mll]'s view ,?omasius & ,delitzs* are agre$4 ,= refutation ( x1 see ,philippi1 ,glaub5slehre1 #b3fc4 ,god's ess5ce is n 8 act1 n only because ?is w\ld imply t he c\ld de/roy himself1 b also because be=e will+ !re mu/ be be+4 ,^? :o hold ,god's ess5ce to be simple activity are impell$ to ?is view by ! fe> ( po/ulat+ "s dead ?+ 9 ,god :i* prec$es all ex]cise ( faculty4 ,s ,mill]1 ,evolution ( ,love1 #dc--8,p]fect action1 consci\s & volitional1 is ! highe/ g5]alization1 ! ultimate unit1 ! uncondition$ nature1 ( inf9ite ,be+02 i4 e41 ,god's nature is subjective action1 :ile ext]nal nature is 8 objective action4 ,a bett] /atem5t1 h[ev]1 is t ( ,b[ne1 ,philos4 ( ,!ism1 #agj--8,:ile !re is a necessity 9 ! s\l1 x becomes controll+ only ?r\gh fre$om2 & we may say t ev]yone mu/ con/itute himself a rational s\l4444 ,?is is absolutely true ( ,god40 #b4 ,immutability4 ,by ?is we mean t ! nature1 attributes1 & w ( ,god are exempt f all *ange4 ,reason tea*es u t no *ange is possible 9 ,god1 :e!r ( increase or decrease1 progress or det]ioration1 contraction or developm5t4 ,all *ange mu/ be to bett] or to worse4 ,b ,god is absolute p]fection1 & no *ange to bett] is possible4 ,*ange to worse w\ld be equally inconsi/5t ) p]fection4 ,no cause = su* *ange exi/s1 ei!r outside ( ,god or 9 ,god himself4 ,psalm #ajb3bg--8?\ art ! same02 ,mal4 #c3f--8;,i1 ,jehovah1 *ange n02 ,james #a3ag--8) :om c be no v>iation1 nei!r %ad[ t is ca/ by turn+40 ,sp5s]1 ,fa]ie ,que51 ,cantos ( ,mutability1 #h3b--8,!n 'g9 ,i ?9k on t :i* nature sayde1 ,( t same "t :5 no m *ange %all be1 ,b /eadfa/ re/ ( all ?+s1 firmly /ay$ ,^u ! pill\rs ( et]nity2 ,= all t move? do? 9 *ange delight1 ,b h5ce=? all %all re/ et]nally ,) him t is ! ,god ( ,sabao? hight2 ,oh ?\ great ,sabao? ,god1 grant me t ,sabba?'s sight60 ,b[ne1 ,philos4 ( ,!ism1 #adf1 def9es immutability z 8! con/ancy & cont9uity ( ! div9e nature :i* exi/s ?r\gh all ! div9e acts z _! law & s\rce40 ,! passages ( ,scripture :i* seem at fir/ sight to ascribe *ange to ,god are to be expla9$ 9 "o ( ?ree ways3 7a7 ,z illu/rations ( ! v>i$ me?ods 9 :i* ,god manife/s 8 immutable tru? & wisdom 9 creation4 ,ma!matical pr9ciples receive new application ) ea* successive /age ( creation4 ,! law ( cohesion gives place to *emical law1 & *emi/ry yields to vital =ces1 b ?r\gh all ^! *anges !re is a div9e tru? & wisdom :i* is un*ang+1 & :i* r$uces all to rational ord]4 ,john ,caird1 ,fund4 ,ideas ( ,*ri/ianity1 #b3adj--8;,immutability is n /]eotyp$ sam5ess1 b impossibility ( deviation by "o hair's bread? f ! c\rse :i* is be/4 ,a man ( great =ce ( "* is cont9ually f9d+ new occasions = ! manife/ation & application ( moral pr9ciple4 ,9 ,god inf9ite consi/5cy is unit$ ) inf9ite flexibility4 ,!re is no iron-b\nd impassibility1 b r an inf9ite orig9ality 9 him40 7b7 ,z an?ropomorphic repres5tations ( ! revelation ( ,god's un*ang+ attributes 9 ! *ang+ circum/ances & v>y+ moral conditions ( creatures4 ,g54 #f3f--8;x rep5t$ ,jehovah t he _h made man0--is to be int]pret$ 9 ! light ( ,num4 #bc3ai--8;,god is n a man1 t he %\ld lie3 nei!r ! son ( man1 t he %\ld rep5t40 ,s cf4 #a ,sam4 #ae3aa ) #ae3bi4 ,god's un*ang+ hol9ess requires him to treat ! wick$ diff]5tly f ! righte\s4 ,:5 ! righte\s become wick$1 8 treatm5t ( !m mu/ *ange4 ,! sun is n fickle or p>tial because x melts ! wax b h>d5s ! clay1--! *ange is n 9 ! sun b 9 ! objects x %9es ^u4 ,! *ange 9 ,god's treatm5t ( m5 is describ$ an?ropomorphically1 z if x 7 a *ange 9 ,god himself1--o!r passages 9 close conjunction ) ! fir/ be+ giv5 to correct any possible misappreh5sion4 ,?reats n fulfill$1 z 9 ,jonah #c3d1 #aj1 are to be expla9$ by _! conditional nature4 ,h5ce ,god's immutability itself r5d]s x c]ta9 t 8 love w adapt itself to e v>y+ mood & condition ( 8 *ildr51 s z to guide _! /eps1 sympa?ize ) _! sorr[s1 answ] _! pray]s4 ,god responds to u m quickly ?an ! "m's face to ! *ang+ moods ( h] babe4 ,godet1 9 ,! ,atonem5t1 #cch--8;,god is ( all be+s ! mo/ delicately & inf9itely s5sitive40 ,god's immutability is n t ( ! /one1 t has no int]nal exp]i5ce1 b r t ( ! column ( m]cury1 t rises & falls ) e *ange 9 ! temp]ature ( ! surr\nd+ atmosph]e4 ,:5 a man bicycl+ aga9/ ! w9d turns ab\t & goes ) ! w9d in/ead ( go+ aga9/ x1 ! w9d seems to *ange1 ?\gh x is bl[+ j z x 0 be=e4 ,! s9n] /ruggles aga9/ ! w9d ( prev5i5t grace until he seems to /rike aga9/ a /one wall4 ,reg5]ation is ,god's conque/ ( our wills by 8 p[]1 & conv]sion is our beg9n+ to turn r\nd & to "w ) ,god r ?an aga9/ ,god4 ,n[ we move )\t ef=t1 because we h ,god at our back2 ,phil4 #b3ab1 #ac--8"w out y\r own salvation 444 = x is ,god :o worke? 9 y40 ,god has n *ang$1 b we h *ang$2 ,john #c3h--8,! w9d bl[e? :]e x w 444 s is e "o t is born ( ! ,_s40 ,jacob's fir/ wre/l+ ) ! ,angel 0 ! picture ( 8 lifelong self-w1 oppos+ ,god2 8 subsequ5t wre/l+ 9 pray] 0 ! picture ( a consecrat$ w1 work+ ) ,god 7,g54 #cb3bd-bh74 ,we seem to conqu] ,god1 b he really conqu]s u4 ,he seems to *ange1 b x is we :o *ange aft] all4 7c7 ,z describ+ executions1 9 "t1 ( purposes et]nally exi/+ 9 ! m9d ( ,god4 ,immutability mu/ n be conf\nd$ ) immobility4 ,?is w\ld d5y all ^? imp]ative volitions ( ,god by :i* he ent]s into hi/ory4 ,! ,scriptures assure u t creation1 miracles1 inc>nation1 reg5]ation1 are imm$iate acts ( ,god4 ,immutability is consi/5t ) con/ant activity & p]fect fre$om4 ,! abolition ( ! ,mosaic disp5sation indicates no *ange 9 ,god's plan2 x is r ! execution ( 8 plan4 ,*ri/'s com+ & "w 7 no sudd5 make%ift1 to rem$y un=ese5 defects 9 ! ,old ,te/am5t s*eme3 ,*ri/ came r 9 8! fulness ( ! "t0 7,gal4 #d3d71 to fulfill ! 8c\nsel0 ( ,god 7,acts #b3bc74 ,g54 #h3a--8;,god rememb]$ ,noah0 int]pos$ by special act = ,noah's deliv]ance1 %[$ t he rememb]$ ,noah4 ,:ile we *ange1 ,god does n4 ,!re is no fickl5ess or incon/ancy 9 him4 ,:]e we once f\nd him1 !re we may f9d him /ill1 z ,jacob did at ,be!l 7,g54 #ce3a1 #f1 #i74 ,immutability is a consolation to ! fai?ful1 b a t]ror to ,god's enemies 7,mal4 #c3f--8;,i1 ,jehovah1 *ange n2 !re=e ye1 ,o sons ( ,jacob1 are n consum$02 ,ps4 #g3aa--8;a ,god t ha? indignation e day074 ,x is consi/5t ) con/ant activity 9 nature & 9 grace 7,john #e3ag--8,my ,fa!r worke? ev5 until n[1 & ,i "w02 ,job #bc3ac1 #ad--8;he is 9 "o m9d1 & :o c turn him8444 ,= he p]=me? t :i* is appo9t$ = me3 & _m su* ?+s are ) him074 ,if ,god's immutability 7 immobility1 we c\ld n wor%ip him1 any m ?an ! anci5t ,greeks 7 able to wor%ip ,fate4 ,ar?ur ,hugh ,cl\gh3 8,x =tifies my s\l to "k1 ,t1 ?\gh ,i p]i%1 ,tru? is s3 ,t1 h[soe'er ,i /ray & range1 ,:ate'er ,i d1 ,?\ do/ n *ange4 ,i /eadi] /ep :5 ,i recall ,t1 if ,i slip1 ,?\ do/ n fall40 ,on ?is attribute see ,*>nock1 ,attributes1 #a3caj-cfb2 ,dorn]1 ,gesammelte ,s*rift51 #ahh-cgg2 translat$ 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahgi3bh-ei1 #bji-bbc4 #c4 ,unity4 ,by ?is we mean 7a7 t ! div9e nature is undivid$ & indivisible 7unus72 & 7b7 t !re is b "o inf9ite & p]fect ,_s 7unicus74 ,deut4 #f3d--8;,he>1 ,o ,israel3 ,jehovah our ,god is "o ,jehovah02 ,is4 #dd3f--8;besides me !re is no ,god02 ,john #e3dd--8! only ,god02 #ag3c--8! only true ,god02 #a ,cor4 #h3d--8no ,god b "o02 #a ,tim4 #a3ag--8! only ,god02 #f3ae--8! bless$ & only ,pot5tate02 ,eph4 #d3e1 #f--8"o ,"l1 "o fai?1 "o baptism1 "o ,god & ,fa!r ( all1 :o is ov] all1 & ?r\gh all1 & 9 all40 ,:5 we read 9 ,mason1 ,fai? ( ! ,gospel1 #be--8,! unity ( ,god is n num]ical1 d5y+ ! exi/5ce ( a second2 x is integral1 d5y+ ! possibility ( division10 we reply t ! unity ( ,god is bo?1--x includes bo? ! num]ical & ! integral elem5ts4 ,humboldt1 9 8 ,cosmos1 has po9t$ out t ! unity & creative ag5cy ( ! heav5ly ,fa!r h giv5 unity to ! ord] ( nature1 & s h furni%$ ! impulse to mod]n physical sci5ce4 ,our fai? 9 a 8univ]se0 re/s hi/orically ^u ! demon/ration ( ,god's unity :i* has be5 giv5 by ! inc>nation & dea? ( ,*ri/4 ,t5nyson1 ,9 ,memoriam3 8,t ,god :o ev] lives & loves1 ,"o ,god1 "o law1 "o elem5t1 ,& "o f> (f div9e ev5t ,to :i* ! :ole creation moves40 ,see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #ahd-ahg4 ,alex&] ,mc,laren3 8,! hea!n h _m gods because !y h no "o t satisfies hungry he>ts or corresponds to _! unconsci\s ideals4 ,complet5ess is n rea*$ by piec+ toge!r _m fragm5ts4 ,! wise m]*antman w gladly b>t] a sack full ( #8goodly pe>ls' = ! "o ( great price4 ,happy !y :o turn away f ! _m to embrace ! ,"o60 ,aga9/ poly!ism1 tri!ism1 or dualism1 we may urge t ! notion ( two or m ,gods is self-contradictory2 s9ce ea* limits ! o!r & de/roys 8 godhood4 ,9 ! nature ( ?+s1 inf9ity & absolute p]fection are possible only to "o4 ,x is unphilosophical1 moreov]1 to assume ! exi/5ce ( two or m ,gods1 :5 "o w expla9 all ! facts4 ,! unity ( ,god is1 h[ev]1 9 no way inconsi/5t ) ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity2 =1 :ile ?is doctr9e holds to ! exi/5ce ( hypo/atical1 or p]sonal1 di/9ctions 9 ! div9e nature1 x also holds t ?is div9e nature is num]ically & et]nally "o4 ,poly!ism is man's attempt to rid himself ( ! notion ( responsibility to "o moral ,lawgiv] & ,judge by divid+ up 8 manife/ations1 & attribut+ !m to sep>ate wills4 ,s ,=ce1 9 ! t]m9ology ( "s mod]n !oriz]s1 is only ,god ) 8 moral attributes left out4 8,h5o!ism0 7says ,max ,mll]1 ,orig9 & ,gr[? ( ,religion1 #bhe7 8conceives ( ea* individual god z unlimit$ by ! p[] ( o!r gods4 ,ea* is felt1 at ! "t1 z supreme & absolute1 not)/&+ ! limitations :i* to our m9ds mu/ arise f 8 p[] be+ condition$ by ! p[] ( all ! gods40 ,ev5 poly!ism _c re/ 9 ! doctr9e ( _m gods1 z an exclusive & all-compreh5d+ explanation ( ! univ]se4 ,! ,greeks believ$ 9 "o supreme ,fate t rul$ bo? gods & m54 ,ari/otle3 8,god1 ?\gh he is "o1 has _m names1 because he is call$ accord+ to /ates into :i* he is ev] ent]+ anew40 ,! doctr9e ( ,god's unity %\ld tea* m5 to give up hope ( any o!r ,god1 to reveal himself to !m or to save !m4 ,!y are 9 ! h&s ( ! "o & only ,god1 & !re=e !re is b "o law1 "o gospel1 "o salvation2 "o doctr9e1 "o duty1 "o de/9y4 ,we _c rid ourselves ( responsibility by call+ ourselves m]e cong]ies ( impressions or m]e victims ( circum/ance4 ,z ,god is "o1 s ! s\l made 9 ,god's image is "o also4 ,on ! orig9 ( poly!ism1 see articles by ,?oluck1 9 ,bib4 ,repos41 #b3hd1 #bdf1 #dda1 & ,max ,mll]1 ,sci5ce ( ,religion1 #abd4 ,mob]ly1 ,atonem5t & ,p]sonality1 #hc--8,! ,alpha & ,omega1 ! beg9n+ & end & sum & mean+ ( ,be+1 is b ,"o4 ,we :o believe 9 a p]sonal ,god d n believe 9 a limit$ ,god4 ,we d n mean "o m1 a bigg] specim5 ( exi/5ces1 among/ exi/5ces4 ,r1 we mean t ! reality ( exi/5ce itself is p]sonal3 t ,p[]1 t ,law1 t ,life1 t ,?\ght1 t ,love1 are ultimately1 9 _! v reality1 id5tifi$ 9 "o supreme1 & t necess>ily a p]sonal ,exi/5ce4 ,n[ su* supreme ,be+ _c be multipli$3 x is incapable ( a plural3 x _c be a g5]ic t]m4 ,!re _c be m ?an "o all-inclusive1 m ?an "o ultimate1 m ?an "o ,god4 ,nor has ,*ri/ian ?\ght1 at any po9t1 = any mom5t1 d>$ or endur$ ! lea/ approa* to su* a ?\ght or phrase z #8two ,gods4' ,if ! ,fa!r is ,god1 & ! ,son ,god1 !y are bo? ! same ,god :olly1 unres]v$ly4 ,god is a p>ticul>1 an unique1 n a g5]al1 t]m4 ,ea* is n only ,god1 b is ! v same #8s+ul>is unicus et totus ,deus4' ,!y are n bo? g5]ically ,god1 z ?\gh #8,god' c\ld be an attribute or pr$icate2 b bo? id5tically ,god1 ! ,god1 ! "o all-inclusive1 indivisible1 ,god4444 ,if ! ?\ght t wi%es to be or?odox _h less t5d5cy to become tri!i/ic1 ! ?\ght t claims to be free w\ld be less ,unit>ian40 ,?ird ,division4--,p]fection1 & attributes !re9 involv$4 ,by p]fection we mean1 n m]e quantitative complet5ess1 b qualitative excell5ce4 ,! attributes involv$ 9 p]fection are moral attributes4 ,"r action among m5 presupposes a p]fect moral organization1 a normal /ate ( intellect1 affection & w4 ,s ,god's activity presupposes a pr9ciple ( intellig5ce1 ( affection1 ( volition1 9 8 inmo/ be+1 & ! exi/5ce ( a wor?y object = ea* ( ^! p[]s ( 8 nature4 ,b 9 et]nity pa/ !re is no?+ exi/+ outside or ap>t f ,god4 ,he mu/ f9d1 & he does f9d1 ! suffici5t object ( intellect1 affection1 & w1 9 himself4 ,!re is a self-kn[+1 a self-lov+1 a self-will+1 :i* con/itute 8 absolute p]fection4 ,! consid]ation ( ! imman5t attributes is1 !re=e1 prop]ly conclud$ ) an acc\nt ( t tru?1 love1 & hol9ess1 :i* r5d] ,god entirely suffici5t to himself4 ,mat4 #e3dh--8,ye !re=e %all be p]fect1 z y\r heav5ly ,fa!r is p]fect02 ,rom4 #ab3b--8p]fect w ( ,god02 ,col4 #a3bh--8p]fect 9 ,*ri/02 cf4 ,deut4 #cb3d--8,! ,rock1 8 "w is p]fect02 ,ps4 #ah3cj--8;,z = ,god1 8 way is p]fect40 #a4 ,tru?4 ,by tru? we mean t attribute ( ! div9e nature 9 virtue ( :i* ,god's be+ & ,god's k et]nally con=m to ea* o!r4 ,9 fur!r explanation we rem>k3 ,a4 ,negatively3 7a7 ,! imman5t tru? ( ,god is n to be conf\nd$ ) t v]acity & fai?fulness :i* p>tially manife/ x to creatures4 ,^! are transitive tru?1 & !y presuppose ! absolute & imman5t attribute4 ,deut #cb3d--8;,a ,god ( fai?fulness & )\t iniquity1 ,j & "r is he02 ,john #ag3c--8! only true ,god0 772 #a ,john #e3bj--8we "k him t is true0 7 74 ,9 bo? ^! passages describes ,god z ! g5u9e1 ! real1 z di/+ui%$ f 1 ! v]aci\s 7comp>e ,john #f3cb--8! true bread02 ,heb4 #h3b--8! true tab]nacle074 ,john #ad3f--8;,i am 444 ! tru?40 ,z 8,i am 444 ! life0 signifies1 n 8,i am ! liv+ "o10 b r 8,i am he :o is life & ! s\rce ( life10 s 8,i am 444 ! tru?0 signifies1 n 8,i am ! tru?ful "o10 b 8,i am he :o is tru? & ! s\rce ( tru?0--9 o!r words1 tru? ( be+1 n m]ely tru? ( expression4 ,s #a ,john #e3g--8! ,_s is ! tru?40 ,cf4 #a ,esdras #a3ch--8,! tru? abide? & is =ev] /rong1 & x live? & rule? =ev]0 p]sonal tru?8 ,see ,godet on ,john #a3ah2 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3aha4 ,tru? is ,god p]fectly reveal$ & kn[n4 ,x may be lik5$ to ! electric curr5t :i* manife/s & measures ! p[] ( ! dynamo4 ,!re is no realm ( tru? ap>t f ! _w-gr\nd1 j z !re is no law ( nature t is indep5d5t ( ! ,au?or ( nature4 ,:ile we "k ourselves only p>tially1 ,god kn[s himself fully4 ,john ,caird1 ,fund4 ,ideas ( ,*ri/ianity1 #a3aib--8;,9 ! life ( ,god !re are no unrealiz$ possibilities4 ,! presupposition ( all our k & activity is t absolute & et]nal unity ( kn[+ & be+ :i* is only ano!r expression = ! nature ( ,god4 ,9 "o s5se1 he is all reality1 & ! only reality1 :il/ all f9ite exi/5ce is b a becom+1 :i* nev] is40 ,l[rie1 ,doctr9e ( ,/4 ,john1 #eg-fc--8,tru? is reality reveal$4 ,jesus is ! ,tru?1 because 9 him ! sum ( ! qualities hidd5 9 ,god is pres5t$ & reveal$ to ! _w1 ,god's nature 9 t]ms ( an active =ce & 9 relation to 8 rational creation40 ,?is def9ition h[ev] ignores ! fact t ,god is tru?1 ap>t f & be=e all creation4 ,z an imman5t attribute1 tru? implies a con=mity ( ,god's k to ,god's be+1 :i* ant$ates ! univ]se2 see ,b4 7b7 bel[4 7b7 ,tru? 9 ,god is n a m]ely active attribute ( ! div9e nature4 ,god is tru?1 n only 9 ! s5se t he is ! be+ :o truly kn[s1 b also 9 ! s5se t he is ! tru? t is kn[n4 ,! passive prec$es ! active2 tru? ( be+ prec$es tru? ( kn[+4 ,plato3 8,tru? is 8 7,god's7 body1 & light 8 %ad[40 ,hollaz 7quot$ 9 ,?omasius1 ,*ri/i ,p]son und ,w]k1 #a3acg7 says t 8tru? is ! con=mity ( ! div9e ess5ce ) ! div9e intellect40 ,see ,g]h>d1 loc4 ii3#aeb2 ,kahnis1 ,dogmatik1 #b3bgb1 #bgi2 #c3aic--8;,di/+ui% 9 ,god ! p]sonal self-consci\sness spirituality1 p]sonality--see pages #beb1 #bec f ! unfold+ ( ?is 9 ! div9e k1 :i* c h no o!r object b ,god himself4 ,s f>1 n[1 z self-kn[+ 9 ,god is absolutely id5tical ) 8 be+ is he ! absolutely true4 ,= tru? is ! k :i* answ]s to ! be+1 & ! be+ :i* answ]s to ! k40 ,royce1 ,_w & ,individual1 #a3bgj--8,tru? ei!r may mean t ab\t :i* we judge1 or x may mean ! correspond5ce betwe5 our ideas & _! objects40 ,god's tru? is bo? object ( 8 k & k ( 8 object4 ,miss ,cl>a ,fr5*1 ,! ,dramatic ,action & ,motive ( ,k+ ,john3 8,y spell ,tru? ) a capital1 & make x an indep5d5t exi/5ce to be s\ght = & absorb$2 b1 unless tru? is ,god1 :at c x d = man8 ,x is only a p]sonality t c t\* a p]sonality40 ,s we ass5t to ! poet's decl>ation t 8,tru?1 cru%$ to e>?1 %all rise aga910 only because ,tru? is p]sonal4 ,*ri/1 ! ,reveal] ( ,god1 is ! ,tru?4 ,he is n simply ! m$ium b also ! object ( all k2 ,eph4 #d3bj--8ye did n s le>n ,*ri/0 ye knew m ?an ! doctr9e ab\t ,*ri/1--ye knew ,*ri/ himself2 ,john #ag3c--8?is is life et]nal t !y %\ld "k !e ! only true ,god1 & him :om ?\ did/ s5d1 ev5 ,jesus ,*ri/40 ,b4 ,positively3 7a7 ,all tru? among m51 :e!r ma!matical1 logical1 moral1 or religi\s1 is to be reg>d$ z hav+ its f\ndation 9 ?is imman5t tru? ( ! div9e nature & z disclos+ facts 9 ! be+ ( ,god4 ,!re is a high] ,m9d ?an our m9d4 ,no apo/le c say 8,i am ! tru?10 ?\gh ea* ( !m c say 8,i speak ! tru?40 ,tru? is n a sci5tific or moral1 b a sub/antial1 ?+--8ni*t ,s*ulsa*e1 sond]n ,leb5ssa*e40 ,"h is ! dignity ( education1 t k ( tru? is k ( ,god4 ,! laws ( ma!matics are disclosures to u1 n ( ! div9e reason m]ely1 = ?is w\ld imply tru? outside ( & be=e ,god1 b ( ! div9e nature4 ,j4 ,w4 ,a4 ,/ew>t3 8,sci5ce is possible because ,god is sci5tific40 ,plato3 8,god geometrizes40 ,b[ne3 8,! heav5s are cry/aliz$ ma!matics40 ,! /atem5t t two & two make f\r1 or t virtue is comm5dable & vice condemnable1 expresses an ev]la/+ pr9ciple 9 ! be+ ( ,god4 ,sep>ate /atem5ts ( tru? are inexplicable ap>t f ! total revelation ( tru?1 & ?is total revelation is inexplicable ap>t f ,"o :o is tru? & :o is ?us reveal$4 ,! sep>ate electric lights 9 our /reets are inexplicable ap>t f ! electric curr5t :i* ?robs ?r\gh ! wires1 & ?is electric curr5t is itself inexplicable ap>t f ! hidd5 dynamo ^: p[] x exactly expresses & measures4 ,! sep>ate lights ( tru? are due to ! realiz+ ag5cy ( ! ,holy ,_s2 ! "o unify+ curr5t :i* !y p>tially reveal is ! outgo+ "w ( ,*ri/1 ! div9e ,logos2 ,*ri/ is ! "o & only ,reveal] ( him :o dwells 89 light unapproa*able2 :om no man ha? se51 nor c see0 7#a ,tim4 #f3af74 ,pr(4 ,h4 ,e4 ,web/] began 8 lectures 8by assum+ ! ,"l ,jesus ,*ri/ & ! multiplication-table40 ,b ?is 0 tautology1 because ! ,"l ,jesus ,*ri/1 ! ,tru?1 ! only reveal] ( ,god1 includes ! multiplication-table4 ,s ,w5dt1 ,tea*+ ( ,jesus1 #a3beg2 #b3bjb1 unduly n>r[s ! scope ( ,*ri/'s revelation :5 he ma9ta9s t ) ,jesus tru? is n ! tru? :i* corresponds to reality b r ! "r conduct :i* corresponds to ! duty prescrib$ by ,god4 8,grace & tru?0 7,john #a3ag7 !n means ! favor ( ,god & ! righte\sness :i* ,god approves4 ,to und]/& ,jesus is impossible )\t be+ e?ically l him4 ,he is k+ ( tru?1 9 t he reveals ?is righte\sness1 & f9ds ob$i5ce = x among m54 ,?is e?ical aspect ( ! tru?1 we w\ld reply1 important z x is1 does n exclude b r requires = its complem5t & presupposition t o!r aspect ( ! tru? z ! reality to :i* all be+ mu/ con=m & ! con=mity ( all be+ to t reality4 ,s9ce ,*ri/ is ! tru? ( ,god1 we are successful 9 our se>* = tru? only z we recognize him4 ,:e!r all roads lead to ,rome dep5ds ^u :i* way y\r face is turn$4 ,foll[ a po9t ( l& out into ! sea1 & y f9d only ocean4 ,) ! back turn$ ^u ,jesus ,*ri/ all foll[+ aft] tru? leads only into mi/ & d>kness4 ,ari/otle's ideal man 0 8a hunt] aft] tru?40 ,b tru? c nev] be f\nd disjo9$ f love1 nor c ! loveless seek] disc]n x4 8,= ! lov+ worm )9 its clod ,7 div9] ?an a loveless ,god0 7,rob]t ,br[n+74 ,h5ce ,*ri/ c say3 ,john #ah3cg--8;,e "o t is ( ! tru? he>e? my voice40 7b7 ,?is attribute !re=e con/itutes ! pr9ciple & gu>antee ( all revelation1 :ile x %[s ! possibility ( an et]nal div9e self-contemplation ap>t f & be=e all creation4 ,x is to be und]/ood only 9 ! light ( ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity4 ,to all ?is doctr9e1 h[ev]1 a great s*ool ( philosoph]s h oppos$ !mselves4 ,duns ,scotus held t ,god's w made tru? z well z "r4 ,desc>tes said t ,god c\ld h made x untrue t ! radii ( a circle are all equal4 ,"l ,bacon said t ,adam's s9 consi/$ 9 seek+ a good 9 itself1 in/ead ( be+ cont5t ) ! m]ely empirical good4 ,:$on1 ,on ! ,w1 #caf--8;,inf9ite wisdom & inf9ite hol9ess consi/ 91 & result f1 ,god's volitions et]nally40 ,we reply t1 to make tru? & good matt]s ( m]e w1 in/ead ( reg>d+ !m z *>act]i/ics ( ,god's be+1 is to d5y t any?+ is true or good 9 itself4 ,if ,god c make tru? to be falsehood1 & inju/ice to be ju/ice1 !n ,god is indiff]5t to tru? or falsehood1 to good or evil1 & he ceases !reby to be ,god4 ,tru? is n arbitr>y1--x is matt] ( be+--! be+ ( ,god4 ,!re are no regulative pr9ciples ( k :i* are n transc5d5tal also4 ,god kn[s & wills tru?1 because he is tru?4 ,rob]t ,br[n+1 ,a ,s\l's ,trag$y1 #bad--8,7't n = ,god1 ,i mean1 :at hope ( tru?--,speak+ tru?1 he>+ tru?--w\ld /ay ) ,man80 ,god's w does n make tru?1 b tru? r makes ,god's w4 ,god's p]fect k 9 et]nity pa/ has an object4 ,t object mu/ be himself4 ,he is ! tru? ,kn[n1 z well z ! tru?ful ,kn[]4 ,b a p]fect objective mu/ be p]sonal4 ,! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity is ! necess>y complem5t to ! doctr9e ( ! ,attributes4 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3ahc--8,! pill> ( cl\d becomes a pill> ( fire40 ,see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #ajb-aab4 ,on ! "q :e!r x is ev] "r to deceive1 see ,pa9e1 ,e?nic ,tr9ities1 #cjj-cci4 ,plato said t ! use ( su* m$ic9es %\ld be re/rict$ to physicians4 ,! rul]s ( ! /ate may lie = ! public good1 b private p n3 8(ficiosum m5dacium40 ,x is bett] to say t deception is ju/ifiable only :]e ! p]son deceiv$ has1 l a wild bea/ or a crim9al or an enemy 9 w>1 put himself out ( human society & depriv$ himself ( ! "r to tru?4 ,ev5 !n deception is a sad necessity :i* witnesses to an abnormal condition ( human affairs4 ,) ,james ,m>t9eau1 :5 ask$ :at answ] he w\ld give to an int5d+ murd]] :5 tru? w\ld mean dea?1 we may say3 8,i suppose ,i %\ld tell an untru?1 & !n %\ld be sorry = x =ev] aft]40 ,on tru? z an attribute ( ,god1 see ,bib4 ,sac41 ,oct4 #ahgg3gce2 ,f9ney1 ,sy/4 ,!ol41 #ffa2 ,janet1 ,f9al ,causes1 #daf4 #b4 ,love4 ,by love we mean t attribute ( ! div9e nature 9 virtue ( :i* ,god is et]nally mov$ to self-communication4 #a ,john #d3h--8;,god is love02 #c3af--8;h]eby "k we love1 because he laid d[n 8 life = u02 ,john #ag3bd--8?\ lov$/ me be=e ! f\ndation ( ! _w02 ,rom4 #ae3cj--8! love ( ! ,_s40 ,9 fur!r explanation we rem>k3 ,a4 ,negatively3 7a7 ,! imman5t love ( ,god is n to be conf\nd$ ) m]cy & goodness t[>d creatures4 ,^! are its manife/ations1 & are to be d5om9at$ transitive love4 ,?omasius1 ,*ri/i ,p]son und ,w]k1 #a3ach1 #aci--8;,god's reg>d = ! happ9ess ( 8 creatures fl[s f ?is self-communicat+ attribute ( 8 nature4 ,love1 9 ! true s5se ( ! ^w1 is liv+ good-w1 ) impulses to imp>tation & union2 self-communication 7bonum communicativum sui72 devotion1 m]g+ ( ! ego 9 ano!r1 9 ord] to p5etrate1 fill1 bless ?is o!r ) itself1 & 9 ?is o!r1 z 9 ano!r self1 to possess itself1 )\t giv+ up itself or los+ itself4 ,love is !re=e possible only betwe5 p]sons1 & always presupposes p]sonality4 ,only z ,tr9ity has ,god love1 absolute love2 because z ,fa!r1 ,son1 & ,holy ,gho/ he /&s 9 p]fect self-imp>tation1 self-devotion1 & communion ) himself40 ,julius ,mll]1 ,doct4 ,s91 #b3acf--8;,god has 9 himself ! et]nal & :olly adequate object ( 8 love1 indep5d5tly ( 8 relation to ! _w40 ,9 ! ,greek my?ology1 ,eros 0 "o ( ! olde/ & yet "o ( ! y\nge/ ( ! gods4 ,s ,dante makes ! olde/ angel to be ! y\nge/1 because ne>e/ to ,god ! f\nta9 ( life4 ,9 #a ,john #b3g1 #h1 8! old comm&m5t0 ( love is ev]more 8a new comm&m5t10 because x reflects ?is et]nal attribute ( ,god4 8,!re is a love un/a9$ by selfi%ness1 ,?' outp\r+ tide ( self-ab&onm5t1 ,t loves to love1 & deems its preci\sness ,repaid 9 lov+1 ?\gh no s5tim5t ,( love return$ rew>d its sacram5t2 ,nor /ays to "q :at ! lov$ "o w1 ,b hymns its ov]ture ) bless+s imman5t2 ,rapt & sublim$ by love's exalt+ ?rill1 ,loves on1 ?r\gh fr[n or smile1 div9e1 immortal /ill40 ,cl>a ,elizabe? ,w>d3 8,if ,i c\ld ga!r e look ( love1 ,t ev] any human creature wore1 ,& all ! looks t joy is "m (1 ,all looks ( grief t mortals ev] bore1 ,& m+le all ) ,god-begott5 grace1 ,me?9ks t ,i %\ld see ! ,savior's face40 7b7 ,love is n ! all-inclusive e?ical attribute ( ,god4 ,x does n include tru?1 nor does x include hol9ess4 ,ladd1 ,philosophy ( ,conduct1 #ceb1 v prop]ly d5ies t b5evol5ce is ! all-inclusive virtue4 ,ju/ness & ,tru?1 he rem>ks1 are n r$ucible to b5evol5ce4 ,9 a review ( ,ladd's "w 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,jan4 #aijc3ahe1 ,c4 ,m4 ,mead adds3 8,he comes to ! conclusion t x is impossible to resolve all ! virtues into ! g5]ic "o ( love or b5evol5ce )\t ei!r giv+ a def9ition ( b5evol5ce :i* is unw>rant$ & virtually nullifies ! end aim$ at1 or fail+ to recognize c]ta9 virtues :i* are z g5u9ely virtues z b5evol5ce itself4 ,p>ticul>ly is x argu$ t ! virtues ( ! w 7c\rage1 con/ancy1 temp]ance71 & ! virtues ( judgm5t 7wisdom1 ju/ness1 tru5ess71 get no recognition 9 ?is attempt to subsume all virtues "u ! "o virtue ( love4 ',! unity ( ! virtues is due to ! unity ( a p]sonality1 9 active & v>i$ relations ) o!r p]sons' 7#cfa74 ,if b5evol5ce means wi%+ happ9ess to all m51 !n happ9ess is made ! ultimate good1 & eudmonism is accept$ z ! true e?ical philosophy4 ,b if1 on ! o!r h&1 9 ord] to avoid ?is conclusion1 b5evol5ce is made to mean wi%+ ! highe/ welf>e to all m51 & ! highe/ welf>e is conceiv$ z a life ( virtue1 !n we come to ! r inane conclusion t ! ess5ce ( virtue is to wi% t m5 may be virtu\s40 ,see also art4 by ,vos1 9 ,presb4 & ,ref4 ,rev41 ,jan4 #ahib3a-cg4 7c7 ,nor is ,god's love a m]e reg>d = be+ 9 g5]al1 irrespective ( its moral quality4 ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 9 8 treatise ,on ! ,nature ( ,virtue1 def9es virtue z reg>d = be+ 9 g5]al4 ,he consid]s t ,god's love is fir/ ( all direct$ t[>d himself z hav+ ! greate/ quantity ( be+1 & only second>ily direct$ t[>d 8 creatures ^: quantity ( be+ is inf9itesimal z comp>$ ) 84 ,b we reply t be+ 9 g5]al is f> too ab/ract a ?+ to elicit or ju/ify love4 ,*>les ,hodge said truly t1 if obligation is prim>ily due to be+ 9 g5]al1 !n !re is no m virtue 9 lov+ ,god ?an !re is 9 lov+ ,satan4 ,virtue1 we hold1 mu/ consi/1 n 9 love = be+ 9 g5]al1 b 9 love = good be+1 t is1 9 love = ,god z holy4 ,love has no moral value except z x is plac$ ^u a "r object & is proportion$ to ! wor? ( t object4 8,love ( be+ 9 g5]al0 makes virtue an irrational ?+1 because x has no /&>d ( conduct4 ,virtue is r ! love ( ,god z "r & z ! s\rce ( "r4 ,g4 ,s4 ,lee1 ,! ,%ad[-cross1 #ch--8;,god is love1 & law is ! way he loves u4 ,b x is also true t ,god is law1 & love is ! way he rules u40 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #hh--8,love is ,god's desire to imp>t himself1 & s all good1 to o!r p]sons1 & to possess !m = 8 own spiritual fell[%ip40 ,! int5t to communicate himself is ! int5t to communicate hol9ess1 & ?is is ! 8t]m9us ad quem0 ( ,god's adm9i/ration4 ,drummond1 9 8 ,asc5t ( ,man1 %[s t ,love began ) ! fir/ cell ( life4 ,evolution is n a tale ( battle1 b a love-/ory4 ,we gradually pass f selfism to o!rism4 ,evolution is ! object ( nature1 & altruism is ! object ( evolution4 ,man nutrition1 look+ to 8 own ?+s2 ,woman reproduction1 look+ to ! ?+s ( o!rs4 ,b ! greate/ ( ^! is love4 ,! mammalia ! mo!rs1 la/ & highe/1 c>e = o!rs4 ,z ! "m gives love1 s ! fa!r gives righte\sness4 ,law1 once a lat5t ?+1 n[ becomes active4 ,! fa!r makes a sort ( consci5ce = ^? b5ea? him4 ,nature1 l ,raphael1 is produc+ a ,holy ,family4 ,jacob ,boehme3 8,?r[ op5 & ?r[ out ?y he>t4 ,= unless ?\ do/ ex]cise ?y he>t1 & ! love ( ?y he>t1 ^u e man 9 ! _w1 ?y self-love1 ?y pride1 ?y envy1 ?y di/a/e1 ?y dislike1 w /ill h dom9ion ov] !e4444 ,9 ! "n & 9 ! /r5g? ( ,god1 love all m54 ,love ?y neighbor z ?yself1 & d to ?y neighbor z ?\ doe/ to ?yself4 ,& d x n[4 ,= n[ is ! accept$ "t1 & n[ is ! day ( salvation40 ,^! expressions are scriptural & valuable1 if !y are int]pret$ e?ically1 & are und]/ood to inculcate ! supreme duty ( lov+ ! ,holy ,"o1 ( be+ holy z he is holy1 & ( seek+ to br+ all intellig5t be+s into con=mity ) 8 hol9ess4 7d7 ,god's love is n a m]ely emotional affection1 proce$+ f s5se or impulse1 nor is x prompt$ by utilit>ian consid]ations4 ,( ! two words = love 9 ! ,n4 ,t41 designates an emotional affection1 :i* is n & _c be comm&$ 7,john #aa3cf--8;,behold h[ he lov$ him6071 :ile expresses a rational & b5evol5t affection :i* spr+s f delib]ate *oice 7,john #c3af--8;,god s lov$ ! _w02 ,mat4 #ai3ai--8,?\ %all love ?y neighbor z ?yself02 #e3dd--8,love y\r enemies074 ,?ay]1 ,n4 ,t4 ,lex41 #fec-- 8prop]ly d5otes a love f\nd$ 9 admiration1 v5]ation1 e/eem1 l ! ,lat4 dilig]e1 to be k9dly dispos$ to "o1 to wi% "o well2 b d5otes an incl9ation prompt$ by s5se & emotion1 ,lat4 am>e4444 ,h5ce m5 are said ,god1 n 40 ,9 ?is ^w 1 :5 us$ ( ,god1 x is already impli$ t ,god loves1 n = :at he c get1 b = :at he c give4 ,! rationality ( 8 love involves moreov] a subord9ation ( ! emotional elem5t to a high] law ?an itself1 namely1 t ( hol9ess4 ,ev5 ,god's self-love mu/ h a reason & norm 9 ! p]fections ( 8 own be+4 ,b4 ,positively3 7a7 ,! imman5t love ( ,god is a rational & volunt>y affection1 gr\nd$ 9 p]fect reason & delib]ate *oice4 ,rits*l1 ,ju/ification & ,reconciliation1 #c3bgg--8,love is w1 aim+ ei!r at ! appropriation ( an object1 or at ! enri*m5t ( its exi/5ce1 because mov$ by a feel+ ( its wor?4444 ,love is to p]sons2 x is a con/ant w2 x aims at ! promotion ( ! o!r's p]sonal end1 :e!r kn[n or conjectur$2 x takes up ! o!r's p]sonal end & makes x "p ( 8 own4 ,w1 z love1 does n give itself up = ! o!r's sake2 x aims at close/ fell[%ip ) ! o!r = a common end40 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #chh-dje--8,love is n rightfully indep5d5t ( ! o!r faculties1 b is subject to regulation & control4444 ,we sometimes say t religion consi/s 9 love4444 ,x w\ld be m /rictly true to say t religion consi/s 9 a new direction ( our love1 a turn+ ( ! curr5t t[>d ,god :i* once fl[$ t[>d self4444 ,*ri/ianity rectifies ! affections1 be=e excessive1 impulsive1 lawless1--gives !m wor?y & immortal objects1 regulates _! int5sity 9 "s due proportion to ! value ( ! ?+s !y re/ ^u1 & tea*es ! true me?ods ( _! manife/ation4 ,9 true religion love =ms a cop>tn]%ip ) reason4444 ,god's love is no arbitr>y1 wild1 passionate torr5t ( emotion 444 & we become l ,god by br++ our emotions1 sympa?ies1 affections1 "u ! dom9ion ( reason & consci5ce40 7b7 ,s9ce ,god's love is rational1 x involves a subord9ation ( ! emotional elem5t to a high] law ?an itself1 namely1 t ( tru? & hol9ess4 ,phil4 #a3i--8;,& ?is ,i pray1 t y\r love may ab\nd yet m & m 9 k & all disc]nm5t40 ,true love among m5 illu/rates ,god's love4 ,x m]ges self 9 ano!r in/ead ( mak+ t o!r an app5dage to self4 ,x seeks ! o!r's true good1 n m]ely 8 pres5t enjoym5t or advantage4 ,its aim is to realize ! div9e idea 9 t o!r1 & !re=e x is ex]cis$ = ,god's sake & 9 ! /r5g? :i* ,god supplies4 ,h5ce x is a love = hol9ess1 & is "u law to hol9ess4 ,s ,god's love takes into acc\nt ! highe/ int]e/s1 & makes inf9ite sacrifice to secure !m4 ,= ! sake ( sav+ a _w ( s9n]s1 ,god 8sp>$ n 8 own ,son1 b deliv]$ him up = u all0 7,rom4 #h3cb71 & 8,jehovah ha? laid on him ! iniquity ( u all0 7,is4 #ec3f74 ,love requires a rule or /&>d = its regulation4 ,?is rule or /&>d is ! hol9ess ( ,god4 ,s once m we see t love _c include hol9ess1 because x is subject to ! law ( hol9ess4 ,love desires only ! be/ = its object1 & ! be/ is ,god4 ,! gold5 rule does n bid u give :at o!rs desire1 b :at !y ne$3 ,rom4 #ae3b--8,let ea* "o ( u please 8 neighbor = t :i* is good1 unto edify+40 7c7 ,! imman5t love ( ,god !re=e requires & f9ds a p]fect /&>d 9 8 own hol9ess1 & a p]sonal object 9 ! image ( 8 own inf9ite p]fections4 ,x is to be und]/ood only 9 ! light ( ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity4 ,z !re is a high] ,m9d ?an our m9d1 s !re is a great] ,he>t ?an our he>t4 ,god is n simply ! lov+ ,"o--he is also ! ,love t is lov$4 ,!re is an inf9ite life ( s5sibility & affection 9 ,god4 ,god has feel+1 & 9 an inf9ite degree4 ,b feel+ alone is n love4 ,love implies n m]ely receiv+ b giv+1 n m]ely emotion b imp>tation4 ,s ! love ( ,god is %[n 9 8 et]nal giv+4 ,james #a3e--8;,god1 :o give?10 or 8! giv+ ,god0 7 7 giv+ is n an episode 9 8 be+--x is 8 nature to give4 ,& n only to give1 b to give himself4 ,?is he does et]nally 9 ! self-communications ( ! ,tr9ity2 ?is he does transitively & temporally 9 8 giv+ ( himself = u 9 ,*ri/1 & to u 9 ! ,holy ,_s4 ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 ,essay on ,tr9ity 7ed4 ,g4 ,p4 ,fi%]71 #gi--8,t 9 ,john ,god is love %[s t !re are m p]sons ?an "o 9 ! ,deity1 = x %[s love to be ess5tial & necess>y to ! ,deity1 s t 8 nature consi/s 9 x1 & ?is supposes t !re is an et]nal & necess>y object1 because all love respects ano!r t is ! belov$4 ,by love "h ! apo/le c]ta9ly means some?+ beside t :i* is commonly call$ self-love3 t is v improp]ly call$ love1 & is a ?+ ( an exce$+ div]se nature f ! affection or virtue ( love ! apo/le is speak+ (40 ,:5 ,newman ,smy?1 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics1 #bbf-bci1 makes ! fir/ *>act]i/ic ( love to be self-affirmation1 & :5 ,dorn]1 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics1 #gc1 makes self-ass]tion an ess5tial "p ( love1 !y violate l+ui/ic usage by includ+ "u love :at prop]ly belongs to hol9ess4 7d7 ,! imman5t love ( ,god con/itutes a gr\nd ( ! div9e bless$ness4 ,s9ce !re is an inf9ite & p]fect object ( love1 z well z ( k & w1 9 ,god's own nature1 ! exi/5ce ( ! univ]se is n necess>y to 8 s]5ity & joy4 ,bless$ness is n itself a div9e attribute2 x is r a result ( ! ex]cise ( ! div9e attributes4 ,x is a subjective result ( ?is ex]cise1 z glory is an objective result4 ,p]fect faculties1 ) p]fect objects = _! ex]cise1 ensure ,god's bless$ness4 ,b love is especially its s\rce4 ,acts #bj3ce--8;,x is m bless$ to give ?an to receive40 ,happ9ess 7hap1 happ57 is gr\nd$ 9 circum/ances2 bless$ness1 9 "*4 ,love prec$es creation & is ! gr\nd ( creation4 ,its object !re=e _c be ! univ]se1 = t does n exi/1 &1 if x did exi/1 c\ld n be a prop] object ( love = ! inf9ite ,god4 ,! only suffici5t object ( 8 love is ! image ( 8 own p]fections1 = t alone is equal to himself4 ,upton1 ,hibb]t ,lectures1 #bfd--8,man mo/ truly realizes 8 own nature1 :5 he is rul$ by rational1 self-=getful love4 ,he _c help inf]r+ t ! highe/ ?+ 9 ! individual consci\sness is ! dom9ant ?+ 9 ! univ]se at l>ge40 ,"h we may ass5t1 if we rememb] t n ! love itself b t :i* is lov$ mu/ be ! dom9ant ?+1 & we %all see t to be n love b hol9ess4 ,jones1 ,rob]t ,br[n+1 #bai--8,love is = ,br[n+ ! highe/1 ri*e/ conception man c =m4 ,x is our idea ( t :i* is p]fect2 we _c ev5 imag9e any?+ bett]4 ,& ! idea ( evolution necess>ily expla9s ! _w z ! return ( ! highe/ to itself4 ,! univ]se is homew>d b\nd4444 ,all ?+s are pot5tially _s1 & all ! ph5om5a ( ! _w are manife/ations ( love4444 ,man's reason is n1 b man's love is1 a direct emanation f ! inmo/ be+ ( ,god0 7#cde74 ,br[n+ %\ld h appli$ to tru? & hol9ess ! same pr9ciple :i* he recogniz$ ) reg>d to love4 ,b we gratefully accept 8 dicta3 8,he t creat$ love1 %all n he love8444 ,god6 ?\ art ,love6 ,i build my fai? on t40 7e7 ,! love ( ,god involves also ! possibility ( div9e suff]+1 & ! suff]+ on acc\nt ( s9 :i* hol9ess necessitates on ! "p ( ,god is itself ! atonem5t4 ,*ri/ is 8! ,lamb t ha? be5 sla9 f ! f\ndation ( ! _w0 7,rev4 #ac3h72 #a ,pet4 #a3ai1 #bj--8preci\s blood1 z ( a lamb )\t blemi% & )\t spot1 ev5 ! blood ( ,*ri/3 :o 0 =ekn[n inde$ be=e ! f\ndation ( ! _w40 ,:ile hol9ess requires atonem5t1 love provides x4 ,! bless$ness ( ,god is consi/5t ) sorr[ = human mis]y & s94 ,god is passible1 or capable ( suff]+4 ,! p]mission ( moral evil 9 ! decree ( creation 0 at co/ to ,god4 ,scripture attributes to him emotions ( grief & ang] at human s9 7,g54 #f3f--8;x griev$ him at 8 he>t02 ,rom4 #a3ah--8wra? ( ,god02 ,eph4 #d3cj--8;grieve n ! ,holy ,_s ( ,god072 pa9ful sacrifice 9 ! gift ( ,*ri/ 7,rom4 #h3cb--8sp>$ n 8 own son02 cf4 ,g54 #bb3af--8;ha/ n )held ?y son07 & p>ticipation 9 ! suff]+ ( 8 p 7,is4 #fc3i--8;9 all _! affliction he 0 afflict$072 ,jesus ,*ri/ 9 8 sorr[ & sympa?y1 8 te>s & agony1 is ! reveal] ( ,god's feel+s t[>d ! race1 & we are urg$ to foll[ 9 8 /eps1 t we may be p]fect1 z our ,fa!r 9 heav5 is p]fect4 ,we _c1 inde$1 conceive ( love )\t self-sacrifice1 nor ( self-sacrifice )\t suff]+4 ,x w\ld seem1 !n1 t z immutability is consi/5t ) imp]ative volitions 9 human hi/ory1 s ! bless$ness ( ,god may be consi/5t ) emotions ( sorr[4 ,b does ,god feel 9 proportion to 8 greatness1 z ! "m suff]s m ?an ! sick *ild :om %e t5ds8 ,does ,god suff] inf9itely 9 e suff]+ ( 8 creatures8 ,we mu/ rememb] t ,god is inf9itely great] ?an 8 creation1 & t he sees all human s9 & woe z "p ( 8 great plan4 ,we are entitl$ to attribute to him only su* passibl5ess z is consi/5t ) inf9ite p]fection4 ,9 comb9+ passibl5ess ) bless$ness1 !n1 we mu/ all[ bless$ness to be ! controll+ elem5t1 = our fundam5tal idea ( ,god is t ( absolute p]fection4 ,m>t5s51 ,dogmatics1 #aja--8,?is limitation is swall[$ up 9 ! inn] life ( p]fection :i* ,god lives1 9 total indep5d5ce ( 8 creation1 & 9 triumphant prospect ( ! fulfilm5t ( 8 great designs4 ,we may !re=e say ) ! old !osophic writ]s3 #8,9 ! out] *amb]s is sadness1 b 9 ! inn] ones is unmix$ joy4' 0 ,*ri/ 0 8ano9t$ 444 ) ! oil ( gladness above 8 fell[s10 & 8= ! joy t 0 set be=e him endur$ ! cross0 7,heb4 #a3i2 #ab3b74 ,love rejoices ev5 9 pa91 :5 ?is br+s good to ^? belov$4 8,?\gh r\nd its base ! roll+ cl\ds are spread1 ,et]nal sun%9e settles on its head40 ,9 ,george ,adam ,smi?'s ,life ( ,h5ry ,drummond1 #aa1 ,drummond cries out aft] he>+ ! confessions ( m5 :o came to him3 8,i am sick ( ! s9s ( ^! m56 ,h[ c ,god be> x80 ,simon1 ,reconciliation1 #cch-cdc1 %[s t be=e ! inc>nation1 ! ,logos 0 a suff]] f ! s9s ( m54 ,?is suff]+ h[ev] 0 kept 9 *eck & c\nt]balanc$ by 8 consci\sness z a factor 9 ! ,godhead1 & by ! cle> k t m5 7 !mselves ! causes ( ?is suff]+4 ,aft] he became inc>nate he suff]$ )\t kn[+ :5ce all ! suff]+ came4 ,he _h a subconsci\s life into :i* 7 int]wov5 elem5ts due to ! s9ful conduct ( ! race ^: en]gy 0 drawn f himself & ) :i* 9 addition he _h organically unit$ himself4 ,if ?is is limitation1 x is also self-limitation :i* ,*ri/ c\ld h avoid$ by n creat+1 pres]v+1 & r$eem+ mank9d4 ,we rejoice 9 giv+ away a daught] 9 m>riage1 ev5 ?\gh x co/s pa94 ,! highe/ bless$ness 9 ! ,*ri/ian is co9cid5t ) agony = ! s\ls ( o!rs4 ,we p>take ( ,*ri/'s joy only :5 we "k ! fell[%ip ( 8 suff]+s4 ,joy & sorr[ c coxi/1 l ,greek fire1 t burns "u wat]4 ,abb ,gratry1 ,la ,morale et la ,loi de l',hi/oire1 #afe1 #aff--8,:at6 ,d y really suppose t ! p]sonal ,god1 free & intellig5t1 lov+ & good1 :o kn[s e detail ( human torture1 & he>s e sigh--?is ,god :o sees1 :o loves z we d1 & m ?an we d--d y believe t he is pres5t & looks pitilessly on :at breaks y\r he>t1 & :at to him mu/ be ! spectacle ( ,satan revel+ 9 ! blood ( humanity8 ,hi/ory tea*es u t m5 s feel = suff]]s t !y h be5 drawn to die ) !m1 s t _! own execution]s h become ! next m>tyrs4 ,& yet y repres5t ,god1 ! absolute goodness1 z alone impassible8 ,x is "h t our evangelical fai? comes 94 ,our ,god 0 made man to suff] & to die6 ,yes1 "h is ! true ,god4 ,he has suff]$ f ! beg9n+ 9 all :o h suff]$4 ,he has be5 hungry 9 all :o h hung]$4 ,he has be5 immolat$ 9 all & ) all :o h (f]$ up _! lives4 ,he is ! ,lamb sla9 f ! f\ndation ( ! _w40 ,simil>ly ,alex&] ,v9et1 ,vital ,*ri/ianity1 #bdj1 rem>ks t 8,! suff]+ ,god is n simply ! tea*+ ( mod]n div9es4 ,x is a ,new ,te/am5t ?\ght1 & x is "o t answ]s all ! d\bts t arise at ! sight ( human suff]+4 ,to "k t ,god is suff]+ ) x makes t suff]+ m awful1 b x gives /r5g? & life & hope1 = we "k t1 if ,god is 9 x1 suff]+ is ! road to victory4 ,if he %>es our suff]+ we %all %>e 8 cr[n10 & we c say ) ! ,psalmi/1 #fh3ai--8;,bless$ be ,god1 :o daily be>e? our burd51 ev5 ! ,god :o is our salvation10 & ) ,isaiah #fc3i--8;,9 all _! affliction he 0 afflict$1 & ! angel ( 8 pres5ce sav$ !m40 ,bord5 ,p4 ,b[ne1 ,atonem5t3 8,some?+ l ?is "w ( grace 0 a moral necessity ) ,god4 ,x 0 an awful responsibility t 0 tak5 :5 our human race 0 laun*$ ) its fe>ful possibilities ( good & evil4 ,god !reby put himself "u inf9ite obligation to c>e = 8 human family2 & reflections on 8 position z ,creator & ,rul]1 in/ead ( remov+1 only make m manife/ ?is obligation4 ,s long z we conceive ,god z sitt+ ap>t 9 supreme ease & self-satisfaction1 he is n love at all1 b only a reflection ( our selfi%ness & vulg>ity4 ,s long z we conceive him z be/[+ bless+ ^u u out ( 8 inf9ite fulness1 b at no real co/ to himself1 he s9ks bel[ ! moral h]oes ( our race4 ,!re is ev] a high] ?\ght possible1 until we see ,god tak+ ! _w ^u 8 he>t1 ent]+ into ! fell[%ip ( our sorr[1 & becom+ ! supreme burd5 be>] & lead] 9 self-sacrifice4 ,!n only are ! possibilities ( grace & condesc5sion & love & moral h]oism fill$ up1 s t no?+ high] rema9s4 ,& ! "w ( ,*ri/1 s f> z x 0 a hi/orical ev5t1 mu/ be view$ n m]ely z a piece ( hi/ory1 b also z a manife/ation ( t cross :i* 0 hidd5 9 ! div9e love f ! f\ndation ( ! _w1 & :i* is involv$ 9 ! exi/5ce ( ! human _w at all40 ,royce1 ,_s ( ,mod]n ,philosophy1 #bfd--8,! et]nal resolution t1 if ! _w w be tragic1 x %all /ill1 9 ,satan's despite1 be spiritual1 is ! v ess5ce ( ! et]nal joy ( t ,_w-,_s ( ^: wisdom ours is b a fragm5t>y reflection4444 ,:5 y suff]1 y\r suff]+s are ,god's suff]+s1--n 8 ext]nal "w nor 8 ext]nal p5alty1 nor ! fruit ( 8 neglect1 b id5tically 8 own p]sonal woe4 ,9 y ,god himself suff]s1 precisely z y d1 & has all y\r reason = ov]com+ ?is grief40 ,h5ry ,n4 ,dodge1 ,*ri/us ,victor3 8,o ,?\1 t f et]nity ,^u ?y w\nd$ he>t ha/ borne ,ea* pang & cry ( mis]y ,:]e) our human he>ts are torn1 ,?y love ^u ! griev\s cross ,do? gl[1 ! beacon-light ( "t1 ,=ev] %>+ pa9 & loss ,) e man 9 e clime4 ,h[ va/1 h[ va/ ,?y sacrifice1 ,z ages come & ages g1 ,/ill wait+ till x %all suffice ,to draw ! la/ cold he>t & sl[60 ,on ! "q1 ,is ,god passible8 see ,b5nett ,tyl]1 ,suff]+s ( ,*ri/2 ,a ,layman1 ,suff]+s ( ,*ri/2 ,woods1 ,works1 #a3bii-cag2 ,bib4 ,sac41 #aa3gdd2 #ag3dbb-dbd2 ,emmons1 ,works1 #d3bja-bjh2 ,fairbairn1 ,place ( ,*ri/1 #dhc-dhg2 ,bu%nell1 ,vic4 ,sacrifice1 #ei-ic2 ,k$ney1 ,*ri/4 ,doctr9e ,h>moniz$1 #a3ahe-bde2 ,edw>d ,bee*]1 ,concord ( ,ages1 #ha-bjd2 ,"y1 ,life & ,light ( ,m51 #bj-dc1 #adg-aej2 ,s*aff1 ,hi/4 ,*ri/4 ,*ur*1 #b3aia2 ,craw=d1 ,fa!rhood ( ,god1 #dc1 #dd2 ,anselm1 ,proslogion1 cap4 #h2 ,upton1 ,hibb]t ,lectures1 #bfh2 ,john ,caird1 ,fund4 ,ideas ( ,*ri/ianity1 #b3aag1 #aah1 #acg-adb4 ,p] contra1 see ,%$d1 ,essays & ,addresses1 #bgg1 #bgi note2 ,woods1 9 ,lit4 & ,!ol4 ,rev41 #ahcd3dc-fa2 ,h>ris1 ,god ! ,creator & ,"l ( ,all1 #a3bja4 ,on ! ,biblical conception ( ,love 9 g5]al1 see article by ,james ,orr1 9 ,ha/+s' ,bible ,diction>y4 #c4 ,hol9ess4 ,hol9ess is self-affirm+ purity4 ,9 virtue ( ?is attribute ( 8 nature1 ,god et]nally wills & ma9ta9s 8 own moral excell5ce4 ,9 ?is def9ition are conta9$ ?ree elem5ts3 fir/1 purity2 secondly1 purity will+2 ?irdly1 purity will+ itself4 ,ex4 #ae3aa--8;glori\s 9 hol9ess02 #ai3aj-af--! p ( ,israel mu/ purify !mselves be=e !y come into ! pres5ce ( ,god2 ,is4 #f3c--8;,holy1 holy1 holy1 is ,jehovah ( ho/s0--notice ! contra/ ) ! unclean lips1 t mu/ be purg$ ) a coal f ! alt> 7v]ses #e-g72 #b ,cor1 #g3a--8;cleanse ourselves f all defilem5t ( fle% & _s1 p]fect+ hol9ess 9 ! fe> ( ,god02 #a ,!ss4 #c3ac--8unblamable 9 hol9ess02 #d3g--8;,god call$ u n = uncleanness1 b 9 sanctification02 ,heb4 #ab3bi--8our ,god is a consum+ fire0--to all iniquity4 ,^! passages %[ t hol9ess is ! opposite to impurity1 t x is itself purity4 ,! developm5t ( ! conception ( hol9ess 9 ,hebrew hi/ory 0 d\btless a gradual "o4 ,at fir/ x may h includ$ little m ?an ! idea ( sep>ation f all t is common1 small & mean4 ,physical cleanl9ess & hatr$ ( moral evil 7 additional elem5ts :i* 9 "t became dom9ant4 ,we mu/ rememb] h[ev] t ! prop] mean+ ( a t]m is to be det]m9$ n by ! e>lie/ b by ! late/ usage4 ,human nature is e?ical f ! />t1 & seeks to express ! ?\ght ( a rule or /&>d ( obligation1 & ( a righte\s ,be+ :o imposes t rule or /&>d4 ,) ! v fir/ conceptions ( maje/y & sep>ation :i* atta* to ! appreh5sion ( div9ity 9 ! *ildhood ( ! race !re m+les at lea/ "s s5se ( ! contra/ betwe5 ,god's purity & human s94 ,! lea/ develop$ man has a consci5ce :i* condemns "s =ms ( wrong do+1 & causes a feel+ ( sep>ation f ! p[] or p[]s above4 ,physical defilem5t becomes ! natural symbol ( moral evil4 ,places & vessels & rites are inve/$ ) dignity z associat$ ) or consecrat$ to ! ,deity4 ,t ! conception ( hol9ess cle>s itself ( extrane\s & uness5tial elem5ts only gradually1 & receives its full expression only 9 ! ,new ,te/am5t revelation & especially 9 ! life & "w ( ,*ri/1 %\ld n bl9d u to ! fact t ! g]ms ( ! idea lie f> back 9 ! v beg9n+s ( man's exi/5ce ^u e>?4 ,ev5 !n ! s5se ( wrong )9 _h = its correlate a dimly recogniz$ righte\sness )\t4 ,s soon z man kn[s himself z a s9n] he kn[s some?+ ( ! hol9ess ( t ,god :om he has (f5d$4 ,we mu/ take exception !re=e to ! rem>k ( ,s*urman1 ,belief 9 ,god1 #bca--8,! fir/ gods 7 probably non-moral be+s10 = ,s*urman himself _h j said3 8,a ,god )\t moral "* is no ,god at all40 ,dillmann1 9 8 ,o4 ,t4 ,!ology1 v prop]ly makes ! fundam5tal ?\ght ( ,o4 ,t4 religion1 n ! unity or ! maje/y ( ,god1 b 8 hol9ess4 ,?is alone =ms ! e?ical basis = fre$om & law4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology--8,! "o aim ( ,*ri/ianity is p]sonal hol9ess4 ,b p]sonal hol9ess w be ! "o absorb+ & atta9able aim ( man1 only z he recognizes x to be ! "o prem95t attribute ( ,god4 ,h5ce ev]y?+ div9e is holy--! temple1 ! ,scriptures1 ! ,_s40 ,see articles on ,hol9ess 9 ,o4 ,t41 by ,j4 ,sk9n]1 & on ,hol9ess 9 ,n4 ,t41 by ,g4 ,b4 ,/ev5s1 9 ,ha/+s' ,bible ,diction>y4 ,! developm5t ( ! idea ( hol9ess z well z ! idea ( love 0 prep>$ = be=e ! adv5t ( man4 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,education & ,optimism3 8,!re 0 a "t :5 ! pa/ hi/ory ( life ^u ! planet seem$ "o ( he>tless & cruel slaught]4 ,! survival ( ! fitte/ _h = its obv]se side ! de/ruction ( myriads4 ,nature 0 #8r$ 9 too? & claw ) rav9e4' ,b fur!r ?\ght has %[n t ?is gloomy view results f a p>tial induction ( facts4 ,paleontological life 0 m>k$ n only by a /ruggle = life1 b by a /ruggle = ! life ( o!rs4 ,! beg9n+s ( altruism are to be se5 9 ! in/9ct ( reproduction1 & 9 ! c>e ( (fspr+4 ,9 e lion's d5 & tig]'s lair1 9 e "m eagle's fe$+ ( h] "y1 !re is a self-sacrifice :i* fa9tly %ad[s =? man's subord9ation ( p]sonal int]e/s to ! int]e/s ( o!rs4 ,b 9 ! ages be=e man c be f\nd incipi5t ju/ice z well z incipi5t love4 ,! /ruggle = "o's own life has its moral side z well z ! /ruggle = ! life ( o!rs4 ,! in/9ct ( self-pres]vation is ! beg9n+ ( "r1 righte\sness1 ju/ice1 & law1 on e>?4 ,e creature owes x to ,god to pres]ve its own be+4 ,s we c f9d an adumbration ( morality ev5 9 ! pr$atory & int]nec9e w>f>e ( ! geologic ages4 ,! imman5t ,god 0 ev5 !n prep>+ ! way = ! rights1 ! dignity1 ! fre$om ( humanity40 ,&1 we may add1 0 prep>+ ! way = ! und]/&+ by m5 ( 8 own fundam5tal attribute ( hol9ess4 ,see ,h5ry ,drummond1 ,asc5t ( ,man2 ,griffi?-,jones1 ,asc5t ?r\gh ,*ri/4 ,9 fur!r explanation we rem>k3 ,a4 ,negatively1 t hol9ess is n 7a7 ,ju/ice1 or purity dem&+ purity f creatures4 ,ju/ice1 ! relative or transitive attribute1 is inde$ ! manife/ation & expression ( ! imman5t attribute ( hol9ess1 b x is n to be conf\nd$ ) x4 ,qu5/$t1 ,!ol41 #h3a3cd1 def9es hol9ess z 8summa omnisque labis exp]s to ,deo puritas1 puritatem debitam exig5s a creaturis0--a def9ition ( transitive hol9ess1 or ju/ice1 r ?an ( ! imman5t attribute4 ,is4 #e3af--8;,jehovah ( ho/s is exalt$ 9 ju/ice1 & ,god ! ,holy ,"o is sanctifi$ 9 righte\sness0--,ju/ice is simply ,god's hol9ess 9 its judicial activity4 ,?\gh hol9ess is commonly a t]m ( sep>ation & expresses ! inh]5t opposition ( ,god to all t is s9ful1 x is also us$ z a t]m ( union1 z 9 ,lev4 #aa3dd--8;be ye holy2 = ,i am holy40 ,:5 ,jesus turn$ f ! "y rul] 7,m>k #aj3bc7 he illu/rat$ ! fir/2 ,john #h3bi illu/rates ! second3 8he t s5t me is ) me40 ,l[rie1 ,doctr9e ( ,/4 ,john1 #ea-eg--8#8;,god is light' 7#a ,john #a3e7 indicates ! "* ( ,god1 moral purity z reveal$1 z produc+ joy & life1 z contra/$ ) do+ ill1 walk+ 9 d>kness1 be+ 9 a /ate ( p]dition40 ,univ]sal human consci5ce is itself a revelation ( ! hol9ess ( ,god1 & ! jo9+ ev]y:]e ( suff]+ ) s9 is ! revelation ( ,god's ju/ice4 ,! wra?1 ang]1 jeal\sy ( ,god %[ t ?is reaction ( ,god's nature is necess>y4 ,god's nature is itself holy1 j1 & good4 ,hol9ess is n replac$ by love1 z ,rits*l holds1 s9ce !re is no self-imp>tation )\t self-affirmation4 ,hol9ess n simply dem&s 9 law1 b imp>ts 9 ! ,holy ,_s2 see ,pfleid]]1 ,grundriss1 #gi--v]sus ,rits*l's doctr9e t hol9ess is ,god's exaltation1 & t x includes love2 see also ,pfleid]]1 ,die ,rits*lis*e ,!ologie1 #ec-fc4 ,santayana1 ,s5se ( ,beauty1 #fi--8;,if p]fection is ! ultimate ju/ification ( be+1 we may und]/& ! gr\nd ( ! moral dignity ( beauty4 ,beauty is a pl$ge ( ! possible con=mity betwe5 ! s\l & nature1 & consequ5tly a gr\nd ( fai? 9 ! supremacy ( ! good40 ,we w\ld reg>d nature h[ev] z m]ely ! symbol & expression ( ,god1 & s w\ld reg>d beauty z a gr\nd ( fai? 9 8 supremacy4 ,:at ,santayana says ( beauty is ev5 m true ( hol9ess4 ,:]ev] we see x1 we recognize 9 x a pl$ge ( ! possible con=mity betwe5 ! s\l & ,god1 & consequ5tly a gr\nd ( fai? 9 ! supremacy ( ,god4 7b7 ,hol9ess is n a complex t]m designat+ ! aggregate ( ! div9e p]fections4 ,on ! o!r h&1 ! notion ( hol9ess is1 bo? 9 ,scripture & 9 ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce1 p]fectly simple1 & p]fectly di/9ct f t ( o!r attributes4 ,dick1 ,!ol41 #a3bge--;,hol9ess v5]abl5ess1 i4 e41 8no p>ticul> attribute1 b ! g5]al "* ( ,god z result+ f 8 moral attributes40 ,w>dlaw calls hol9ess ! union ( all ! attributes1 z pure :ite light is ! union ( all ! color$ rays ( ! spectrum 7,!ology1 #a3fah-fcd74 ,s ,nitzs*1 ,sy/em ( ,*ri/4 ,doct41 #aff2 ,h4 ,w4 ,bee*]3 8,hol9ess :ol5ess40 ,approa*+ ?is conception is ! def9ition ( ,w4 ,n4 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #hc--8;,hol9ess is ! glori\s fulness ( ! goodness ( ,god1 consi/5tly held z ! pr9ciple ( 8 own action1 & ! /&>d = 8 creatures40 ,?is implies1 accord+ to ,dr4 ,cl>ke1 #a4 ,an inw>d "* ( p]fect goodness2 #b4 ,t "* z ! consi/5t pr9ciple ( 8 own action2 #c4 ,! goodness :i* is ! pr9ciple ( 8 own action is also ! /&>d = !irs4 ,9 o!r words1 hol9ess is #a4 "*2 #b4 self-consi/5cy2 #c4 requirem5t4 ,we object to ?is def9ition t x fails to def9e4 ,we are n told :at is ess5tial to ?is "*2 ! def9ition includes 9 hol9ess t :i* prop]ly belongs to love2 x omits all m5tion ( ! mo/ important elem5ts 9 hol9ess1 namely purity & "r4 ,a simil> lack ( cle> def9ition appe>s 9 ! /atem5t ( ,m>k ,hopk9s1 ,law ( ,love1 #aje--8;,x is ?is d\ble aspect ( love1 reveal+ ! :ole moral nature1 & turn+ e way l ! flam+ sword t kept ! way ( ! tree ( life1 t is t]m$ hol9ess40 ,z has be5 %[n above1 hol9ess is contra/$ 9 ,scripture1 n ) m]e f9it5ess or littl5ess or mis=tune or pov]ty or ev5 unreality1 b only ) uncleanness & s9fulness4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,*ri/4 ,!ology1 #hj--8;,hol9ess 9 man is ! image ( ,god's4 ,b x is cle> t hol9ess 9 man is n 9 proportion to ! o!r p]fections ( 8 be+--to 8 p[]1 8 k1 8 wisdom1 ?\gh x is 9 proportion to 8 rectitude ( w--& !re=e _c be ! sum ( all p]fections4444 ,to id5tify hol9ess ) ! sum ( all p]fections is to make x mean m]e complet5ess ( "*40 7c7 ,hol9ess is n ,god's self-love1 9 ! s5se ( supreme reg>d = 8 own int]e/ & happ9ess4 ,!re is no utilit>ian elem5t 9 hol9ess4 ,buddeus1 ,!ol4 ,dogmat41 #b3a3cf1 def9es hol9ess z ,god's self-love4 ,b ,god loves & affirms self1 n z self1 b z ! holie/4 ,!re is no self-seek+ 9 ,god4 ,n ! seek+ ( ,god's int]e/s1 b love = ,god z holy1 is ! pr9ciple & s\rce ( hol9ess 9 man4 ,to call hol9ess ,god's self-love is to say t ,god is holy because ( :at he c make by x1 i4 e41 to d5y t hol9ess has any indep5d5t exi/5ce4 ,see ,?omasius1 ,*ri/i ,p]son und ,w]k1 #a3aee4 ,we w\ld n d5y1 b w\ld r ma9ta91 t !re is a prop] self-love :i* is n selfi%ness4 ,?is prop] self-love1 h[ev]1 is n love at all4 ,x is r self-respect1 self-pres]vation1 self-v9dication1 & x con/itutes an important *>act]i/ic ( hol9ess4 ,b to def9e hol9ess z m]ely ,god's love = himself1 is to leave out ( ! def9ition ! reason = ?is love 9 ! purity & righte\sness ( ! div9e nature4 ,god's self-respect implies t ,god respects himself = some?+ 9 8 own be+4 ,:at is t some?+8 ,is hol9ess ,god's 8moral excell5ce0 7,hopk9s71 or ,god's 8p]fect goodness0 7,cl>ke78 ,b :at is ?is moral excell5ce or p]fect goodness8 ,we h "h ! me?od & ! end describ$1 b n ! motive & gr\nd4 ,god does n love himself = 8 love1 b he loves himself = 8 hol9ess4 ,^? :o ma9ta9 t love is self-affirm+ z well z self-communicat+1 & !re=e t hol9ess is ,god's love = himself1 mu/ /ill admit t ?is self-affirm+ love :i* is hol9ess conditions & furni%es ! /&>d = ! self-communicat+ love :i* is b5evol5ce4 ,g4 ,b4 ,/ev5s1 ,johann9e ,!ology1 #cfd1 tells u t 8,god's righte\sness is ! self-respect ( p]fect love40 ,mill]1 ,evolution ( ,love1 #ec--8,self-love is t k9d ( action :i* 9 a p]fect be+ actualizes1 9 a f9ite be+ seeks to actualize1 a p]fect or ideal self40 ,9 o!r words1 love is self-affirmation4 ,b we object t self-love is n love at all1 because !re is 9 x no self-communicat+4 ,if hol9ess is 9 any s5se a =m or manife/ation ( love--a "q :i* we h yet to consid]--x is c]ta9ly n a unit>ian & utilit>ian self-love1 :i* w\ld be id5tical ) selfi%ness1 b r an affection :i* implies tr9it>ian o!rness & ! ma9t5ance ( self z an ideal object4 ,?is appe>s to be ! mean+ ( ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 9 8 ,essay on ! ,tr9ity 7ed4 ,fi%]71 #gi--8;,all love respects ano!r t is ! belov$4 ,by love ! apo/le c]ta9ly means some?+ beside t :i* is commonly call$ self-love3 t is v improp]ly call$ love1 & is a ?+ ( an exce$+ div]se nature f ! affection or virtue ( love ! apo/le is speak+ (40 ,yet we %all see t :ile ,jona?an ,edw>ds d5ies hol9ess to be a unit>ian & utilit>ian self-love1 he reg>ds its v ess5ce to be ,god's tr9it>ian love = himself z a be+ ( p]fect moral excell5ce4 ,rits*l's lack ( tr9it>ian conviction makes x impossible = him to furni% any prop] gr\nd = ei!r love or hol9ess 9 ! nature ( ,god4 ,rits*l holds t ,*ri/ z a p]son is an end 9 himself2 he realiz$ 8 own ideal2 he develop$ 8 own p]sonality2 he rea*$ 8 own p]fection 9 8 "w = man2 he is n m]ely a means t[>d ! end ( man's salvation4 ,b :5 ,rits*l comes to 8 doctr9e ( ,god1 he is /rangely inconsi/5t ) all ?is1 = he fails to repres5t ,god z hav+ any end 9 himself1 & deals ) him simply z a means t[>d ! k+dom ( ,god z an end4 ,g>vie1 ,rits*lian ,!ology1 #bef1 #bgh1 #bgi1 well po9ts out t p]sonality means self-possession z well z self-communication1 di/9ction f o!rs z well z union ) o!rs4 ,rits*l does n see t ,god's love is prim>ily direct$ t[>ds 8 ,son1 & only second>ily direct$ t[>d ! ,*ri/ian community4 ,s he ignores ! imman5t ,tr9ity4 ,be=e self-communication !re mu/ be self-ma9t5ance4 ,o!rwise ,god gives up 8 indep5d5ce & makes creat$ exi/5ce necess>y4 7d7 ,hol9ess is n id5tical )1 or a manife/ation (1 love4 ,s9ce self-ma9t5ance mu/ prec$e self-imp>tation1 & s9ce b5evol5ce has its object1 motive1 /&>d & limit 9 righte\sness1 hol9ess ! self-affirm+ attribute c 9 no way be resolv$ into love ! self-communicat+4 ,t hol9ess is a =m ( love is ! doctr9e ( ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 ,essay on ! ,tr9ity 7ed4 ,fi%]71 #ig--8',tis 9 ,god's inf9ite love to himself t 8 hol9ess consi/s4 ,z all creature hol9ess is to be resolv$ into love1 z ! ,scripture tea*es u1 s do? ! hol9ess ( ,god himself consi/ 9 inf9ite love to himself4 ,god's hol9ess is ! inf9ite beauty & excell5ce ( 8 nature1 & ,god's excell5cy consi/s 9 8 love to himself40 ,9 8 treatise on ,! ,nature ( ,virtue1 ,jona?an ,edw>ds def9es virtue z reg>d = be+ 9 g5]al4 ,he consid]s t ,god's love is fir/ ( all direct$ t[>d himself z hav+ ! greate/ quantity ( be+1 & only second>ily direct$ t[>ds 8 creatures ^: quantity ( be+ is inf9itesimal z comp>$ ) 84 ,god !re=e f9ds 8 *ief end 9 himself1 & ,god's self-love is 8 hol9ess4 ,?is pr9ciple has p]meat$ & dom9at$ subsequ5t ,new ,engl& !ology1 f ,samuel ,hopk9s1 ,works1 #b3i-ff1 :o ma9ta9s t hol9ess love ( be+ 9 g5]al1 to ,horace ,bu%nell1 ,vic>i\s ,sacrifice1 :o decl>es3 8,righte\sness1 transf]r$ into a ^w ( ! affections1 is love2 & love1 translat$ back into a ^w ( ! consci5ce1 is righte\sness2 ! et]nal law ( "r is only ano!r conception ( ! law ( love2 ! two pr9ciples1 "r & love1 appe> exactly to measure ea* o!r40 ,s ,p>k1 ,disc\rses1 #aee-ahj4 ,simil> doctr9e is taught by ,dorn]1 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics1 #gc1 #ic1 #ahd--8,love unites exi/5ce = self ) exi/5ce = o!rs1 self-ass]tion & self-imp>tation4444 ,self-love 9 ,god is n selfi%ness1 because he is ! orig9al & necess>y seat ( good 9 g5]al1 univ]sal good4 ,god gu>ds 8 honor ev5 9 giv+ himself to o!rs4444 ,love is ! p[] & desire to be "o's self :ile 9 ano!r1 & :ile "o's self to be 9 ano!r :o is tak5 into ! he>t z an end4444 ,i am to love my neighbor only z myself4444 ,virtue h[ev] requires n only good w1 b ! will+ ( ! "r ?+40 ,s ,newman ,smy?1 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics1 #bbf-bci1 holds t #a4 ,love is self-affirmation4 ,h5ce he ma9ta9s t hol9ess or self-respect is involv$ 9 love4 ,righte\sness is n an indep5d5t excell5ce to be contra/$ ) or put 9 opposition to b5evol5ce2 x is an ess5tial "p ( love4 #b4 ,love is self-imp>tation4 ,! only limit is e?ical4 ,"h is an ev] deep5+ imman5ce1 yet always "s transc5d5ce ( ,god1 = ,god _c d5y himself4 #c4 ,love is self-f9d+ 9 ano!r4 ,vic>i\sness belongs to love4 ,we reply to bo? ,dorn] & ,smy? t _! ackn[l$gm5t t love has its condition1 limit1 motive1 object & /&>d1 %[s t !re is a pr9ciple high] ?an love1 & :i* regulates love4 ,?is pr9ciple is recogniz$ z e?ical4 ,x is id5tical ) ! "r4 ,god _c d5y himself because he is fundam5tally ! "r4 ,?is self-affirmation is hol9ess1 & hol9ess _c be a "p ( love1 or a =m ( love1 because x conditions & dom9ates love4 ,to call x b5evol5ce is to ignore its maje/ic di/9ctness & to imp]il its legitimate supremacy4 ,god mu/ fir/ ma9ta9 8 own be+ be=e he c give to ano!r1 & ?is self-ma9t5ance mu/ h its reason & motive 9 ! wor? ( t :i* is ma9ta9$4 ,hol9ess _c be love1 because love is irrational & caprici\s except z x has a /&>d by :i* x is regulat$1 & ?is /&>d _c be itself love1 b mu/ be hol9ess4 ,we agree ) ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #ib1 t 8love is ! desire to imp>t hol9ess40 ,love is a means to hol9ess1 & hol9ess is !re=e ! supreme good & some?+ high] ?an m]e love4 ,x is n true1 vice v]sa1 t hol9ess is ! desire to imp>t love1 or t hol9ess is a means to love4 ,in/ead !n ( say+1 ) ,cl>ke1 t 8hol9ess is c5tral 9 ,god1 b love is c5tral 9 hol9ess10 we %\ld pref] to say3 8,love is c5tral 9 ,god1 b hol9ess is c5tral 9 love10 ?\gh 9 ?is case we %\ld use ! t]m love z includ+ self-love4 ,x is /ill bett] n to use ! ^w love at all z ref]r+ to ,god's reg>d = himself4 ,9 ord9>y usage1 love means only reg>d = ano!r & self-communication to t o!r4 ,to embrace 9 x ,god's self-affirmation is to mis9t]pret hol9ess & to reg>d x z a means to an end1 in/ead ( mak+ x :at x really is1 ! sup]ior object1 & ! regulative pr9ciple1 ( love4 ,t :i* lays d[n ! norm or /&>d = love mu/ be ! sup]ior ( love4 ,:5 we =get t 8,righte\sness & ju/ice are ! f\ndation ( 8 ?rone0 7,ps4 #ig3b71 we lose "o ( ! *ief l&m>ks ( ,*ri/ian doctr9e & involve ourselves 9 a mi/ ( error4 ,rev4 #d3c--8!re 0 a ra9b[ r\nd ab\t ! ?rone0 9 ! mid/ ( ! ra9b[ ( p>don & peace !re is a ?rone ( hol9ess & judgm5t4 ,9 ,mat4 #f3i1 #aj1 8,?y k+dom come0 is n ! fir/ petition1 b r1 8,hall[$ be ?y "n40 ,x is a false idea ( ! div9e simplicity :i* w\ld r$uce ! attributes to "o4 ,self-ass]tion is n a =m ( self-imp>tation4 ,n s5ti5cy1 a /ate ( ! s5sibility1 ev5 ?\gh x be ! pure/ b5evol5ce1 is ! fundam5tal ?+1 b r activity ( w & a "r direction ( t w4 ,hodge1 ,essays1 #acc-acf1 #bfb-bgc1 %[s well t holy love is a love controll$ by hol9ess4 ,hol9ess is n a m]e means to happ9ess4 ,to be happy is n ! ultimate reason = be+ holy4 ,"r & wrong are n matt]s ( pr(it & loss4 ,to be told t ,god is only b5evol5ce1 & t he puni%es only :5 ! happ9ess ( ! univ]se requires x1 de/roys our :ole allegiance to ,god & does viol5ce to ! con/itution ( our nature4 ,t ,god is only love has be5 call$ 8! doctr9e ( ! papahood ( ,god40 ,god is 8a summ] ocean ( k9dl9ess1 nev] agitat$ by /orms0 7,dale1 ,ephesians1 #ei74 ,b ,jesus gives u ! be/ idea ( ,god1 & 9 him we f9d1 n only pity1 b at times moral indignation4 ,john #ag3aa--8;,holy ,fa!r0 m ?an love4 ,love c be ex]cis$ by ,god only :5 x is "r love4 ,hol9ess is ! track on :i* ! eng9e ( love mu/ run4 ,! track _c be ! eng9e4 ,if ei!r includes ! o!r1 !n x is hol9ess t includes love1 s9ce hol9ess is ! ma9t5ance ( ,god's p]fection1 & p]fection involves love4 ,he t is holy affirms himself also z ! p]fect love4 ,if love 7 fundam5tal1 !re w\ld be no?+ to give1 & s love w\ld be va9 & wor?less4 ,!re c be no giv+ ( self1 )\t a previ\s self-affirm+4 ,god is n holy because he loves1 b he loves because he is holy4 ,love _c direct itself2 x is "u bonds to hol9ess4 ,ju/ice is n dep5d5t on love = its "r to be4 ,/eph5 ,g4 ,b>nes3 8,m]e good w is n ! sole cont5t ( ! law2 x is insuffici5t 9 times ( fi]y trial2 x is inadequate z a basis = retribution4 ,love ne$s ju/ice1 & ju/ice ne$s love2 bo? are comm&$ 9 ,god's law & are p]fectly reveal$ 9 ,god's "*40 ,!re may be a friction betwe5 a man's two h&s1 & !re may be a conflict betwe5 a man's consci5ce & 8 w1 betwe5 8 intellect & 8 affection4 ,=ce is ,god's en]gy "u resi/ance1 ! resi/ance z well z ! en]gy be+ 84 ,s1 ^u occasion ( man's s91 hol9ess & love 9 ,god become opposite poles or =ces4 ,! fir/ & mo/ s]i\s effect ( s9 is n its effect ^u man1 b its effect ^u ,god4 ,hol9ess necess>ily requires suff]+1 & love endures x4 ,?is et]nal suff]+ ( ,god on acc\nt ( s9 is ! atonem5t1 & ! inc>nate ,*ri/ only %[s :at has be5 9 ! he>t ( ,god f ! beg9n+4 ,to make hol9ess a =m ( love is really to d5y its exi/5ce1 & ) ?is to d5y t any atonem5t is necess>y = man's salvation4 ,if hol9ess is ! same z love1 h[ is x t ! classic _w1 t knew ( ,god's hol9ess1 did n also "k ( 8 love8 ,! e?ics "h rem9ds "o ( ,abraham ,l9coln's meat bro? t 0 made ( ! %ad[ ( a pigeon t di$ ( />vation4 ,hol9ess t is only good w is n hol9ess at all1 = x lacks ! ess5tial elem5ts ( purity & righte\sness4 ,at ! railway swit*+ gr\nds ea/ ( ,ro*e/]1 !re is a man ^: duty x is to move a b> ( iron two or ?ree in*es to ! left or to ! "r4 ,s he det]m9es :e!r a tra9 %all g t[>d ,new ,york or t[>d ,wa%+ton1 t[>d ,new ,orleans or ,san ,francisco4 ,our conclusion at ?is po9t 9 our !ology w simil>ly det]m9e :at our future sy/em w be4 ,! pr9ciple t hol9ess is a manife/ation ( love1 or a =m ( b5evol5ce1 leads to ! conclusions t happ9ess is ! only good1 & ! only end2 t law is a m]e exp$i5t = ! secur+ ( happ9ess2 t p5alty is simply det]r5t or re=matory 9 its aim2 t no atonem5t ne$s to be (f]$ to ,god = human s92 t et]nal retribution _c be v9dicat$1 s9ce !re is no hope ( re=m4 ,?is view ignores ! te/imony ( consci5ce & ( ,scripture t s9 is intr9sically ill-des]v+1 & mu/ be puni%$ on t acc\nt1 n because puni%m5t w "w good to ! univ]se1--inde$1 x c\ld n "w good to ! univ]se1 unless x 7 j & "r 9 itself4 ,x ignores ! fact t m]cy is optional ) ,god1 :ile hol9ess is inv>iable2 t puni%m5t is _m times trac$ to ,god's hol9ess1 b nev] to ,god's love2 t ,god is n simply love b light--moral light--& !re=e is 8a consum+ fire0 7,heb4 #ab3bi7 to all iniquity4 ,love *a/5s 7,heb4 #ab3f71 b only hol9ess puni%es 7,j]4 #aj3bd--8;correct me1 b 9 measure2 n 9 ?9e ang]02 ,ez4 #bh3bb--8;,i %all h execut$ judgm5ts 9 h]1 & %all be sanctifi$ 9 h]02 #cf3ba1 #bb--;9 judgm5t 8,i d n ?is = y\r sake1 b = my holy "n02 #a ,john #a3e--8;,god is light1 & 9 him is no d>kness0--moral d>kness2 ,rev4 #ae3a1 #d--8! wra? ( ,god 444 ?\ only art holy 444 ?y righte\s acts h be5 made manife/02 #af3e--8righte\s art ?\ 444 because ?\ did/ ?us judge02 #ai3b--8true & righte\s are 8 judgm5ts2 = he ha? judg$ ! great h>lot074 ,see ,hovey1 ,god ) ,u1 #ahg-bba2 ,philippi1 ,glaub5slehre1 #b3hj-hb2 ,?omasius1 ,*ri/i ,p]son und ,w]k1 #aed1 #aee1 #cdf-cec2 ,lange1 ,pos4 ,dogmatik1 #bjc4 ,b4 ,positively1 t hol9ess is 7a7 ,purity ( sub/ance4--,9 ,god's moral nature1 z necess>ily act+1 !re are inde$ ! two elem5ts ( will+ & be+4 ,b ! passive logically prec$es ! active2 be+ comes be=e will+2 ,god is pure be=e he wills purity4 ,s9ce purity1 h[ev]1 9 ord9>y usage is a negative t]m & means only fre$om f /a9 or wrong1 we mu/ include 9 x also ! positive idea ( moral rightness4 ,god is holy 9 t he is ! s\rce & /&>d ( ! "r4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #hj--8;,hol9ess is moral purity1 n only 9 ! s5se ( abs5ce ( all moral /a91 b ( complac5cy 9 all moral good40 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ology1 #a3cfb--8;,hol9ess 9 ,god is con=mity to 8 own p]fect nature4 ,! only rule = ! div9e w is ! div9e reason2 & ! div9e reason prescribes ev]y?+ t is befitt+ an inf9ite ,be+ to d4 ,god is n "u law1 nor above law4 ,he is law4 ,he is righte\s by nature & necessity4444 ,god is ! s\rce & au?or ( law = all moral be+s40 ,we may bett] ,%$d's def9ition by say+ t hol9ess is t attribute 9 virtue ( :i* ,god's be+ & ,god's w et]nally con=m to ea* o!r4 ,9 ?us ma9ta9+ t holy be+ logically prec$es holy will+1 we diff] f ! view ( ,lotze1 ,philos4 ( ,religion1 #aci--8,su* w ( ,god no m foll[s f 8 nature z second>y to x1 or prec$es x z prim>y to x ?an1 9 motion1 direction c be antec$5t or subsequ5t to velocity40 ,b[ne1 ,philos4 ( ,!ism1 #af--8;,god's nature a fix$ law ( activity or mode ( manife/ation4444 ,b laws ( ?\ght are no limitation1 because !y are simply modes ( ?\ght-activity4 ,!y d n rule intellect1 b only express :at intellect is40 ,9 spite ( ^! utt]ances ( ,lotze & ( ,b[ne1 we mu/ ma9ta9 t1 z tru? ( be+ logically prec$es tru? ( kn[+1 & z a lov+ nature prec$es lov+ emotions1 s purity ( sub/ance prec$es purity ( w4 ,! opposite doctr9e leads to su* utt]ances z t ( ,:$on 7,on ! ,w1 #caf73 8,god is holy1 9 t he freely *ooses to make 8 own happ9ess 9 et]nal "r4 ,:e!r he c\ld n make himself equally happy 9 wrong is m ?an we c say4444 ,inf9ite wisdom & inf9ite hol9ess consi/ 91 & result f1 ,god's volitions et]nally40 ,:$on !re=e believes1 n 9 ,god's un*angeabl5ess1 b 9 ,god's un*ang+ness4 ,he _c say :e!r motives may n at "s "t prove /ronge/ = div9e apo/asy to evil4 ,! ess5tial hol9ess ( ,god af=ds no basis = c]ta9ty4 ,"h we h to rely on our fai?1 m ?an on ! object ( fai?2 see ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 ,review ( ,:$on1 9 ,fai? & ,philosophy1 #cee-cii4 ,z we said ) reg>d to tru?1 s "h we say ) reg>d to hol9ess1 t to make hol9ess a matt] ( m]e w1 in/ead ( reg>d+ x z a *>act]i/ic ( ,god's be+1 is to d5y t any?+ is holy 9 itself4 ,if ,god c make impurity to be purity1 !n ,god 9 himself is indiff]5t to purity or impurity1 & he ceases !re=e to be ,god4 ,rob]t ,br[n+1 ,a ,s\l's ,trag$y1 #bbc--8;,i tru/ 9 ,god--! ,"r %all be ! ,"r ,& o!r ?an ! ,wrong1 :ile ,he endures40 ,p4 ,s4 ,moxom3 8,revelation is a disclosure ( ! div9e righte\sness4 ,we d n add to ! ?\ght :5 we say t x is also a disclosure ( ! div9e love1 = love is a manife/ation or realization ( t rightness ( relations :i* righte\sness is40 ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 ,sy/em1 #bbc-bca--8,virtue love = bo? happ9ess & hol9ess1 yet hol9ess z ultimate1--love to ! highe/ ,p]son & to 8 ends & objects40 7b7 ,en]gy ( w4--,?is purity is n simply a passive & dead quality2 x is ! attribute ( a p]sonal be+2 x is p5etrat$ & p]vad$ by w4 ,hol9ess is ! free moral movem5t ( ! ,godhead4 ,z !re is a high] ,m9d ?an our m9d1 & a great] ,he>t ?an our he>t1 s !re is a gr&] ,w ?an our w4 ,hol9ess conta9s ?is elem5t ( w1 al?\gh x is a w :i* expresses nature1 in/ead ( caus+ nature4 ,x is n a /ill & moveless purity1 l ! :it5ess ( ! new-fall5 sn[1 or ! /a9less blue ( ! summ] sky4 ,x is ! mo/ trem5d\s ( en]gies1 9 unsleep+ movem5t4 ,x is 8a glassy sea0 7,rev4 #ae3b71 b 8a glassy sea m+l$ ) fire40 ,a4 ,j4 ,gordon3 8,hol9ess is n a dead-:ite purity1 ! p]fection ( ! faultless m>ble /atue4 ,life1 z well z purity1 ent]s into ! idea ( hol9ess4 ,!y :o are #8)\t fault be=e ! ?rone' are !y :o #8foll[ ! ,lamb :i!rsoev] he goe?'--holy activity att5d+ & express+ _! holy /ate40 ,m>t5s51 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics1 #fb1 #fc--8;,god is ! p]fect unity ( ! e?ically necess>y & ! e?ically free02 8,god _c d o!rwise ?an w 8 own ess5tial nature40 ,see ,?omasius1 ,*ri/i ,p]son und ,w]k1 #ada2 & on ! ,hol9ess ( ,*ri/1 see ,godet1 ,def5ce ( ! ,*ri/ian ,fai?1 #bjc-bda4 ,! c5tre ( p]sonality is w4 ,kn[+ has its end 9 feel+1 & feel+ has its end 9 will+4 ,h5ce ,i mu/ make feel+ subord9ate to will+1 & happ9ess to righte\sness4 ,i mu/ w ) ,god & = ,god1 & mu/ use all my influ5ce ov] o!rs to make !m l ,god 9 hol9ess4 ,william ,james1 ,w to ,believe1 #abc--8,m9d mu/ fir/ get its impression f ! object2 !n def9e :at t object is & :at active measures its pres5ce dem&s2 & f9ally react4444 ,all fai?s & philosophies1 moods & sy/ems1 subs]ve & pass into a ?ird /age1 ! /age ( action40 ,:at is true ( man is ev5 m true ( ,god4 ,all ! wills ( m5 comb9$1 aye1 ev5 ! :ole mov+ en]gy ( humanity 9 all climes & ages1 is z no?+ comp>$ ) ! ext5t & int5sity ( ,god's will+4 ,! :ole mom5tum ( ,god's be+ is beh9d moral law4 ,t law is 8 self-expression4 ,8 b5efic5t yet also 8 t]rible arm is ev] def5d+ & en=c+ x4 ,god mu/ ma9ta9 8 hol9ess1 = ?is is 8 v ,godhead4 ,if he did n ma9ta9 x1 love w\ld h no?+ to give away1 or to make o!rs p>tak]s (4 ,does ,god w ! good because x is ! good1 or is ! good good because ,god wills x8 ,9 ! =m] case1 !re w\ld seem to be a good above ,god2 9 ! latt] case1 good is some?+ arbitr>y & *angeable4 ,kaftan1 ,dogmatik1 #ahf1 #ahg1 says t nei!r ( ^! is true2 he holds t !re is no a priori good be=e ! will+ ( x1 & he also holds t w )\t direction is n w2 ! good is good = ,god1 n be=e1 b 91 8 self-det]m9ation4 ,dorn]1 ,sy/em ,doctr9e1 #a3dcb1 holds on ! contr>y t bo? ^! are true1 because ,god has no m]e simple =m ( be+1 :e!r necess>y or free1 b r a manifoldly div]se be+1 absolutely correlat$ h[ev]1 & reciprocally condition+ itself1--t is1 a tr9it>ian be+1 bo? necess>y & free4 ,we side ) ,dorn] "h1 & claim t ! belief t ,god's w is ! executive ( ,god's be+ is necess>y to a correct e?ics & to a correct !ology4 ,celsus ju/ifi$ poly!ism by hold+ t :atev] is a "p ( ,god reveals ,god1 s]ves ,god1 & !re=e may rationally be wor%ip$4 ,*ri/ianity he except$ f ?is wide tol]ation1 because x wor%ip$ a jeal\s ,god :o 0 n cont5t to be "o ( _m4 ,b ?is jeal\sy really signifies t ,god is a ,be+ to :om moral di/9ctions are real4 ,! ,god ( ,celsus1 ! ,god ( pan!ism1 is n jeal\s1 because he is n ! ,holy ,"o1 b simply ! ,absolute4 ,! category ( ! e?ical is m]g$ 9 ! category ( be+2 see ,bruce1 ,apologetics1 #af4 ,! great lack ( mod]n !ology is precisely ?is e?ical lack2 hol9ess is m]g$ 9 b5evol5ce2 !re is no prop] recognition ( ,god's righte\sness4 ,john #ag3be--8,o righte\s ,fa!r1 ! _w knew !e n0--is a text z true to-day z 9 ,jesus' "t4 ,see ,issel1 ,begriff d] ,heiligkeit 9 ,n4 ,t41 #da1 #hd1 :o def9es hol9ess 9 ,god z 8! e?ical p]fection ( ,god 9 its exaltation above all t is s9ful10 & hol9ess 9 m5 z 8! condition correspond+ to t ( ,god1 9 :i* man keeps himself pure f s940 7c7 ,self-affirmation4--,hol9ess is ,god's self-will+4 ,8 own purity is ! supreme object ( 8 reg>d & ma9t5ance4 ,god is holy1 9 t 8 inf9ite moral excell5ce affirms & ass]ts itself z ! highe/ possible motive & end4 ,l tru? & love1 ?is attribute c be und]/ood only 9 ! light ( ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity4 ,hol9ess is purity will+ itself4 ,we h an analogy 9 man's duty ( self-pres]vation1 self-respect1 self-ass]tion4 ,virtue is b\nd to ma9ta9 & def5d itself1 z 9 ! case ( ,job4 ,9 8 be/ mom5ts1 ! ,*ri/ian feels t purity is n simply ! negation ( s91 b ! affirmation ( an inw>d & div9e pr9ciple ( righte\sness4 ,?omasius1 ,*ri/i ,p]son und ,w]k1 #a3acg--8;,hol9ess is ! p]fect agreem5t ( ! div9e will+ ) ! div9e be+2 = z ! p]sonal creature is holy :5 x wills & det]m9es itself z ,god wills1 s is ,god ! holy "o because he wills himself z :at he is 7or1 to be :at he is74 ,9 virtue ( ?is attribute1 ,god excludes f himself ev]y?+ t contradicts 8 nature1 & affirms himself 9 8 absolutely good be+--8 be+ l himself40 ,?oluck on ,romans1 #e? ed41 #aea--8,! t]m hol9ess %\ld be us$ to indicate a relation ( ,god to himself4 ,t is holy :i*1 undi/urb$ f )\t1 is :olly l itself40 ,dorn]1 ,sy/em ( ,doctr9e1 #a3def--8;,x is ! "p ( goodness to protect goodness40 ,we %all see1 :5 we consid] ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity1 t t doctr9e has close relations to ! doctr9e ( ! imman5t attributes4 ,x is 9 ! ,son t ,god has a p]fect object ( w1 z well z ( k & love4 ,! object ( ,god's will+ 9 et]nity pa/ c be no?+ outside ( himself4 ,x mu/ be ! highe/ ( all ?+s4 ,we see :at x mu/ be1 only :5 we rememb] t ! "r is ! unconditional imp]ative ( our moral nature4 ,s9ce we are made 9 8 image we mu/ conclude t ,god et]nally wills righte\sness4 ,n all ,god's acts are acts ( love1 b all are acts ( hol9ess4 ,! self-respect1 self-pres]vation1 self-affirmation1 self-ass]tion1 self-v9dication1 :i* we call ,god's hol9ess1 is only fa9tly reflect$ 9 su* utt]ances z ,job #bg3e1 #f--8,till ,i die ,i w n put away m9e integrity f me4 ,my righte\sness ,i hold fa/1 & w n let x g02 #ca3cg--8;,i w\ld decl>e unto him ! numb] ( my /eps2 z a pr9ce w\ld ,i g ne> unto him40 ,! fact t ! ,_s ( ,god is d5om9at$ ! ,holy ,_s %\ld tea* u :at is ,god's ess5tial nature1 & ! requisition t we %\ld be holy z he is holy %\ld tea* u :at is ! true /&>d ( human duty & object ( human ambition4 ,god's hol9ess moreov]1 s9ce x is self-affirmation1 furni%es ! gu>antee t ,god's love w n fail to secure its end1 & t all ?+s w s]ve 8 purpose4 ,rom4 #aa3cf--8;,= ( him1 & ?r\gh him1 & unto him1 are all ?+s4 ,to him be ! glory = ev]4 ,am540 ,on ! :ole subject ( ,hol9ess1 z an attribute ( ,god1 see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,philosophy & ,religion1 #ahh-bjj1 & ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #chh-dje2 ,delitzs*1 art4 ,heiligkeit1 9 ,h]zog1 ,real5cyclop42 ,baudiss91 ,begriff d] ,heiligkeit im ,a4 ,t41--synopsis 9 ,/udi5 und ,kritik51 #ahhj3afi2 ,rob]tson ,smi?1 ,prophets ( ,israel1 #bbd-bcd2 ,e4 ,b4 ,coe1 9 ,presb4 & ,ref4 ,rev41 ,jan4 #ahij3db-dg2 & articles on ,hol9ess 9 ,o4 ,t41 & ,hol9ess 9 ,n4 ,t41 9 ,ha/+s' ,bible ,diction>y4 ,,vi4 ,relative or ,transitive ,attributes4 ,fir/ ,division4--,attributes hav+ relation to ,"t & ,space4 #a4 ,et]nity4 ,by ?is we mean t ,god's nature 7a7 is )\t beg9n+ or end2 7b7 is free f all succession ( "t2 & 7c7 conta9s 9 itself ! cause ( "t4 ,deut4 #cb3dj--8;,= ,i lift up my h& to heav51 ,& say1 ,z ,i live =ev]444402 ,ps4 #ij3b--8;,be=e ! m\nta9s 444 f ev]la/+ 444 ?\ art ,god02 #ajb3bg--8?y ye>s %all h no end02 ,is4 #da3d--8;,i ,jehovah1 ! fir/1 & ) ! la/02 #a ,cor4 #b3g-- --8be=e ! worlds0 or 8ages0 --8be=e ! f\ndation ( ! _w0 7,eph4 #a3d74 #a ,tim4 #a3ag-- --8,k+ ( ! ages0 7s also ,rev4 #ae3h74 #a ,tim4 #f3af--8:o only ha? immortality40 ,rev4 #a3h--8! ,alpha & ! ,omega40 ,dorn]3 8,we mu/ n make ,kronos 7"t7 & ,uranos 7space7 e>li] div9ities be=e ,god40 ,!y are among ! 8all ?+s0 t 7 8made by him 0 7,john #a3c74 ,yet "t & space are n sub/ances2 nei!r are !y attributes 7qualities ( sub/ance72 !y are r relations ( f9ite exi/5ce4 7,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #efh1 pref]s to call "t & space 8correlates to be+s & ev5ts407 ,) f9ite exi/5ce !y come into be+2 !y are n m]e regulative conceptions ( our m9ds2 !y exi/ objectively1 :e!r we p]ceive !m or n4 ,ladd3 8,"t is ! m5tal presupposition ( ! duration ( ev5ts & ( objects4 ,"t is n an entity1 or x w\ld be necess>y to suppose "s o!r "t 9 :i* x endures4 ,we ?9k ( space & "t z unconditional1 because !y furni% ! conditions ( our k4 ,! age ( a son is condition$ on ! age ( 8 fa!r4 ,! conditions !mselves _c be condition$4 ,space & "t are m5tal =ms1 b n only t4 ,!re is an extra-m5tal some?+ 9 ! case ( space & "t1 z 9 ! case ( s\nd40 ,ex4 #c3ad--8;,i am0--involves et]nity4 ,ps4 #ajb3ab-ad--8;,b ?\1 ,o ,jehovah1 wilt abide =ev]4444 ,?\ wilt arise1 & h m]cy ^u ,zion2 = x is "t to h pity ^u h]4444 ,= ?y s]vants 444 h pity ^u h] du/0 because ,god is et]nal1 he w h compassion ^u ,zion3 he w d ?is1 = ev5 we1 h] *ildr51 love h] v du/4 ,jude #be--8;glory1 maje/y1 dom9ion & p[]1 be=e all "t1 & n[1 & = ev]more40 ,pfleid]]1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #a3afe--8;,god is #8,k+ ( ! ons' 7#a ,tim4 #a3ag71 because he di/+ui%es1 9 8 ?9k+1 8 et]nal inn] ess5ce f 8 *angeable work+ 9 ! _w4 ,he is n m]g$ 9 ! process40 ,edw>ds ! y\ng] describes timelessness z 8! imm$iate & inv>iable possession ( ! :ole unlimit$ life toge!r & at once40 ,tyl]1 ,greek ,poets1 #adh--8,! hea!n gods _h only exi/5ce )\t end4 ,! ,greeks seem nev] to h conceiv$ ( exi/5ce )\t beg9n+40 ,on precognition z connect$ ) ! s-call$ future already exi/+1 & on app>5t "t progression z a subjective human s5sation & n inh]5t 9 ! univ]se z x exi/s 9 an inf9ite ,m9d1 see ,my]s1 ,human ,p]sonality1 #b3bfb sq4 ,t5nyson1 ,life1 #a3cbb--8;,= 0 & is & w be are b is3 ,& all creation is "o act at once1 ,! bir? ( light2 b we t are n all1 ,z p>ts1 c see b p>ts1 n[ ?is1 n[ t1 ,& live p]=ce f ?\ght to ?\ght1 & make ,! act a phantom ( succession3 !re ,our weakness someh[ %apes ! %ad[1 ,"t40 ,augu/9e3 8,mundus non 9 tempore1 s$ cum tempore1 factus e/40 ,!re is no mean+ to ! "q3 ,:y did creation take place :5 x did r ?an e>li]8 or ! "q3 ,:at 0 ,god do+ be=e creation8 ,^! que/ions presuppose an indep5d5t "t 9 :i* ,god creat$--a "t be=e "t4 ,on ! o!r h&1 creation did n take place at any "t1 b ,god gave bo? ! _w & "t _! exi/5ce4 ,royce1 ,_w & ,individual1 #b3aaa-aae--8,"t is ! =m ( ! w1 z space is ! =m ( ! intellect 7cf4 #abd1 #acc74 ,"t runs only 9 "o direction 7unlike space71 t[>d fulfilm5t ( /riv+ or expectation4 ,9 pursu+ its goals1 ! self lives 9 "t4 ,e n[ is also a succession1 z is illu/rat$ 9 any melody4 ,to ,god ! univ]se is #8totum simul'1 z to u any succession is "o :ole4 #bcc--;,dea? is a *ange 9 ! "t-span--! m9imum ( "t 9 :i* a succession c appe> z a complet$ :ole4 ,to ,god #8a ?\s& ye>s' are #8z "o day' 7#b ,pet4 #c3h74 #dai--;,god1 ,9 8 totality z ! ,absolute ,be+1 is consci\s n1 9 "t1 b ( "t1 & ( all t inf9ite "t conta9s4 ,9 "t !re foll[1 9 _! sequ5ce1 ! *ords ( 8 endless symphony4 ,= him is ?is :ole symphony ( life at once4444 ,y unite pres5t1 pa/ & future 9 a s+le consci\sness :5ev] y he> any ?ree successive words1 = "o is pa/1 ano!r is pres5t1 at ! same "t t a ?ird is future4 ,s ,god unites 9 timeless p]ception ! :ole succession ( f9ite ev5ts4444 ,! s+le notes are n lo/ 9 ! melody4 ,y are 9 ,god1 b y are n lo/ 9 ,god40 ,moz>t1 quot$ 9 ,wm4 ,james1 ,pr9ciples ( ,psy*ology1 #a3bee--8;,all ! inv5t+ & mak+ goes on 9 me z 9 a beautiful /rong dream4 ,b ! be/ ( all is ! he>+ ( x all at once40 ,et]nity is inf9ity 9 its relation to "t4 ,x implies t ,god's nature is n subject to ! law ( "t4 ,god is n 9 "t4 ,x is m correct to say t "t is 9 ,god4 ,al?\gh !re is logical succession 9 ,god's ?\ghts1 !re is no *ronological succession4 ,"t is duration measur$ by successions4 ,duration )\t succession w\ld /ill be duration1 ?\gh x w\ld be immeasurable4 ,reid1 ,intellectual ,p[]s1 essay #c1 *ap4 #e--8,we may measure duration by ! succession ( ?\ghts 9 ! m9d1 z we measure l5g? by in*es or feet1 b ! notion or idea ( duration mu/ be antec$5t to ! m5suration ( x1 z ! notion ( l5g? is antec$5t to its be+ measur$40 ,god is n "u ! law ( "t4 ,solly1 ,! ,w1 #bed--8;,god looks ?r\gh "t z we look ?r\gh space40 ,murphy1 ,sci5tific ,bases1 #ij--8;,et]nity is n1 z m5 believe1 ,be=e & aft] u1 an endless l9e4 ,no1 'tis a circle4 ,inf9itely great--,all ! circumf]5ce ) creations ?rong$3 ,god at ! c5tre dwells1 behold+ all4 ,& z we move 9 ?is et]nal r\nd1 ,! f9ite portion :i* alone we see ,beh9d u1 is ! pa/2 :at lies be=e ,we call ! future4 ,b to him :o dwells ,f> at ! c5tre1 equally remote ,f e po9t ( ! circumf]5ce1 ,bo? are alike1 ! future & ! pa/40 ,vaughan 7#afee73 8,i saw ,et]nity ! o!r night4 ,l a great r+ ( pure & endless light4 ,& calm z x 0 bright2 & r\nd b5ea? x ,"t 9 h\rs1 days1 ye>s1 ,driv5 by ! sph]es1 ,l a va/ %ad[ mov$1 9 :i* ! _w ,& all h] tra9 7 hurl$40 ,we _c h d]iv$ f exp]i5ce our idea ( et]nal duration 9 ! pa/1 = exp]i5ce gives u only duration t has _h beg9n+4 ,! idea ( duration z )\t beg9n+ mu/ !re=e be giv5 u by intuition4 ,case1 ,physical ,realism1 #cgi1 #chj--8,"t is ! cont9uance1 or cont9ual duration1 ( ! univ]se40 ,bradley1 ,appe>ance & ,reality1 #ci--;,consid] "t z a /ream--"u a spatial =m3 8,if y take "t z a relation betwe5 units )\t duration1 !n ! :ole "t has no duration1 & is n "t at all4 ,b if y give duration to ! :ole "t1 !n at once ! units !mselves are f\nd to possess x1 & !y cease to be units40 ,! n[ is n "t1 unless x turns pa/ into future1 & ?is is a process4 ,! n[ !n consi/s ( n[s1 & ^! n[s are undiscov]able4 ,! unit is no?+ b its own relation to some?+ beyond1 some?+ n discov]able4 ,"t !re=e is n real1 b is appe>ance4 ,john ,caird1 ,fund4 ,ideas1 #a3ahe--8,t :i* grasps & correlates objects 9 space _c itself be "o ( ! ?+s ( space2 t :i* appreh5ds & connects ev5ts z succe$+ ea* o!r 9 "t mu/ itself /& above ! succession or /ream ( ev5ts4 ,9 be+ able to measure !m1 x _c be fl[+ ) !m4 ,!re c\ld n be = self-consci\sness any su* ?+ z "t1 if x 7 n1 9 "o aspect ( x1 above "t1 if x did n belong to an ord] :i* is or has 9 x an elem5t :i* is et]nal4444 ,z tak5 up into ?\ght1 succession is n successive40 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,hi/orical ,disc\rse1 ,may #i1 #aijj--8;,god is above space & "t1 & we are 9 ,god4 ,we m>k ! passage ( "t1 & we write our hi/ories4 ,b we c d ?is1 only because 9 our highe/ be+ we d n belong to space & "t1 b h 9 u a bit ( et]nity4 ,john ,caird tells u t we c\ld n p]ceive ! fl[+ ( ! /ream if we 7 ourselves a "p ( ! curr5t2 only z we h our feet plant$ on solid rock1 c we obs]ve t ! wat] ru%es by4 ,we belong to ,god2 we are ak9 to ,god2 & :ile ! _w passes away & ! lu/ !re(1 he t doe? ! w ( ,god abide? =ev]40 ,j4 ,e/l9 ,c>p5t] & ,p4 ,h4 ,wick/e$1 ,/udies 9 ,!ology1 #aj--8;,dante speaks ( ,god z him 9 :om #8e :]e & e :5 are focus$ 9 a po9t'1 t is1 to :om e season is n[ & e place is "h40 ,amiel's ,j\rnal3 8,"t is ! supreme illusion4 ,x is ! inn] prism by :i* we decompose be+ & life1 ! mode by :i* we p]ceive successively :at is simultane\s 9 idea4444 ,"t is ! successive disp]sion ( be+1 j z spee* is ! successive analysis ( an intuition1 or ( an act ( ! w4 ,9 itself x is relative & negative1 & x disappe>s )9 ! absolute ,be+4444 ,"t & space are fragm5ts ( ! ,inf9ite = ! use ( f9ite creatures4 ,god p]mits !m t he may n be alone4 ,!y are ! mode "u :i* creatures are possible & conceivable4444 ,if ! univ]se subsi/s1 x is because ! et]nal ,m9d loves to p]ceive its own cont5t1 9 all its weal? & expression1 especially 9 its /ages ( prep>ation4444 ,! radiations ( our m9d are imp]fect reflections f ! great %[ ( fireworks set 9 motion by ,brahma1 & great art is great only because ( its con=mities ) ! div9e ord]--) t :i* is40 ,yet we are f> f say+ t "t1 n[ t x exi/s1 has no objective reality to ,god4 ,to him1 pa/1 pres5t1 & future are 8"o et]nal n[10 n 9 ! s5se t !re is no di/9ction betwe5 !m1 b only 9 ! s5se t he sees pa/ & future z vividly z he sees ! pres5t4 ,) creation "t began1 & s9ce ! successions ( hi/ory are v]itable successions1 he :o sees accord+ to tru? mu/ recognize !m4 ,?omas ,c>lyle calls ,god 8! ,et]nal ,n[40 ,mason1 ,fai? ( ! ,gospel1 #cj--8;,god is n contemptu\s ( "t4444 ,"o day is ) ! ,"l z a ?\s& ye>s4 ,he values ! inf9itesimal 9 "t1 ev5 z he does 9 space4 ,h5ce ! pati5ce1 ! long-suff]+1 ! expectation1 ( ,god40 ,we are rem9d$ ( ! inscription on ! sun-dial1 9 :i* x is said ( ! h\rs3 8,p]eunt et imputantur0--8,!y pass by1 & !y are *>g$ to our acc\nt40 ,a c]ta9 prea*] rem>k$ on ! wisdom ( ,god :i* has s arrang$ t ! mom5ts ( "t come successively & n simultane\sly1 & ?us prev5t inf9ite confusion6 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3cdd1 illu/rates ,god's et]nity by ! two ways 9 :i* a p]son may see a procession3 fir/ f a doorway 9 ! /reet ?r\gh :i* ! procession is pass+2 & secondly1 f ! top ( a /eeple :i* comm&s a view ( ! :ole procession at ! same in/ant4 ,s4 ,e4 ,meze1 quot$ 9 ,royce1 ,conception ( ,god1 #dj--8;,z if all ( u 7 cyl9d]s1 ) _! ends remov$1 mov+ ?r\gh ! wat]s ( "s placid lake4 ,to ! cyl9d]s ! wat]s seem to move4 ,:at has pass$ is a memory1 :at is to come is d\btful4 ,b ! lake kn[s t all ! wat] is equally real1 & t x is quiet1 immovable1 unruffl$4 ,speak+ te*nically1 "t is no reality4 ,?+s seem pa/ & future1 &1 9 a s5se1 non-exi/5t to u1 b1 9 fact1 !y are j z g5u9ely real z ! pres5t is40 ,yet ev5 "h !re is an ord]4 ,y _c play a symphony backw>d & h music4 ,?is qualification at lea/ mu/ be put ^u ! words ( ,b]keley2 8,a succession ( ideas ,i take to con/itute "t1 & n to be only ! s5sible measure !re(1 z ,mr4 ,locke & o!rs ?9k40 ,f9ney1 quot$ 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,oct4 #ahgg3gbb--8;,et]nity to u means all pa/1 pres5t & future duration4 ,b to ,god x means only n[4 ,duration & space1 z !y respect 8 exi/5ce1 mean inf9itely diff]5t ?+s f :at !y d :5 !y respect our exi/5ce4 ,god's exi/5ce & 8 acts1 z !y respect f9ite exi/5ce1 h relation to "t & space4 ,b z !y respect 8 own exi/5ce1 ev]y?+ is "h & n[4 ,) respect to all f9ite exi/5ces1 ,god c say3 ,i 01 ,i am1 ,i %all be1 ,i w d2 b ) respect to 8 own exi/5ce1 all t he c say is3 ,i am1 ,i d40 ,edw>ds ! y\ng]1 ,works1 #a3chf1 #chg--8,!re is no succession 9 ! div9e m9d2 !re=e no new op]ations take place4 ,all ! div9e acts are f et]nity1 nor is !re any "t ) ,god4 ,! effects ( ^! div9e acts d inde$ all take place 9 "t & 9 a succession4 ,if x %\ld be said t on ?is supposition ! effects take place n till long aft] ! acts by :i* !y are produc$1 ,i answ] t !y d s 9 our view1 b n 9 ! view ( ,god4 ,) him !re is no "t2 no be=e or aft] ) respect to "t3 nor has "t any exi/5ce 9 ! div9e m9d1 or 9 ! nature ( ?+s indep5d5tly ( ! m9ds & p]ceptions ( creatures2 b x dep5ds on ! succession ( ^? p]ceptions40 ,we mu/ qualify ?is /atem5t ( ! y\ng] ,edw>ds by ! foll[+ f ,julius ,mll]3 8,if ,god's work+ c h no relation to "t1 !n all bonds ( union betwe5 ,god & ! _w are snapp$ asund]40 ,x is an int]e/+ "q :e!r ! human _s is capable ( timeless exi/5ce1 & :e!r ! conception ( "t is purely physical4 ,9 dreams we seem to lose sight ( succession2 9 extreme pa9 an age is compress$ into a m9ute4 ,does ?is ?r[ light ^u ! nature ( prophecy8 ,is ! s\l ( ! prophet rapt into ,god's timeless exi/5ce & vision8 ,x is d\btful :e!r ,rev4 #aj3f--8!re %all be "t no long]0 c be reli$ ^u to prove ! affirmative2 = ! ,rev4 ,v]s4 m>g4 & ! ,am]ican ,revis]s translate 8!re %all be delay no long]40 ,julius ,mll]1 ,doct4 ,s91 #b3adg--8;,all self-consci\sness is a victory ov] "t40 ,s ) memory2 see ,dorn]1 ,glaub5slehre1 #a3dga4 ,on 8! dea?-vision ( "o's :ole exi/5ce10 see ,frances ,kemble ,butl]'s exp]i5ce 9 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3cea--8;,"h !re is succession & s]ies1 only s exce$+ly rapid z to seem simultane\s40 ,?is rapidity h[ev] is s great z to %[ t ea* man c at ! la/ be judg$ 9 an in/ant4 ,on space & "t z unlimit$1 see ,port]1 ,hum4 ,intellect1 #efd-eff4 ,on ! conception ( et]nity1 see ,mansel1 ,lectures1 ,essays & ,reviews1 #aaa-abf1 & ,mod]n ,spiritualism1 #bee-bib2 ,new ,engl&]1 ,april1 #ahge3 art4 on ! ,metaphysical ,idea ( ,et]nity4 ,= practical lessons f ! ,et]nity ( ,god1 see ,p>k1 ,disc\rses1 #acg-aed2 ,we/cott1 ,"s ,lessons ( ! ,rev4 ,v]s41 7,pott1 ,n4 ,y41 #ahig71 #ahg--) comm5ts on 9 ,eph4 #c3ba1 ,heb4 #aa3c1 ,rev4 #d2 #aj1 #aa--8! univ]se "u ! aspect ( "t40 #b4 ,imm5sity4 ,by ?is we mean t ,god's nature 7a7 is )\t ext5sion2 7b7 is subject to no limitations ( space2 & 7c7 conta9s 9 itself ! cause ( space4 #a ,k+s #h3bg--8;behold1 heav5 & ! heav5 ( heav5s _c conta9 !e40 ,space is a creation ( ,god2 ,rom4 #h3ci--8nor height nor dep?1 nor any o!r creature40 ,zahn1 ,bib4 ,dogmatik1 #adi--8,scripture does n tea* ! imman5ce ( ,god 9 ! _w1 b ! imman5ce ( ! _w 9 ,god40 ,dante does n put ,god1 b ,satan at ! c5tre2 & ,satan1 be+ at ! c5tre1 is cru%$ ) ! :ole weight ( ! univ]se4 ,god is ! ,be+ :o encompasses all4 ,all ?+s exi/ 9 him4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,space is a relation2 ,god is ! au?or ( relations & ( our modes ( ?\ght2 !re=e ,god is ! au?or ( space4 ,space conditions our ?\ght1 b x does n condition ,god's ?\ght40 ,jona?an ,edw>ds3 8,place itself is m5tal1 & )9 & )\t are m5tal conceptions4444 ,:5 ,i say ! mat]ial univ]se exi/s only 9 ! m9d1 ,i mean t x is absolutely dep5d5t on ! conception ( ! m9d = its exi/5ce1 & does n exi/ z spirits d1 ^: exi/5ce does n consi/ 91 nor 9 dep5d5ce on1 ! conception ( o!r m9ds40 ,h4 ,m4 ,/anley1 on ,space & ,sci5ce1 9 ,philosophical ,rev41 ,nov4 #ahih3fae--8,space is n full ( ?+s1 b ?+s are spaceful4444 ,space is a =m ( dynamic appe>ance40 ,bradley c>ries ! ideality ( space to an extreme1 :51 9 8 ,appe>ance & ,reality1 #ce-ch1 he tells u3 ,space is n a m]e relation1 = x has p>ts1 & :at c be ! p>ts ( a relation8 ,b space is no?+ b a relation1 = x is l5g?s ( l5g?s (--no?+ t we c f9d4 ,we c f9d no t]ms ei!r inside or outside4 ,space1 to be space1 mu/ h space outside itself4 ,bradley !re=e concludes t space is n reality b only appe>ance4 ,imm5sity is inf9ity 9 its relation to space4 ,god's nature is n subject to ! law ( space4 ,god is n 9 space4 ,x is m correct to say t space is 9 ,god4 ,yet space has an objective reality to ,god4 ,) creation space began to be1 & s9ce ,god sees accord+ to tru?1 he recognizes relations ( space 9 8 creation4 ,_m ( ! rem>ks made 9 explanation ( "t apply equally to space4 ,space is n a sub/ance nor an attribute1 b a relation4 ,x exi/s s soon z ext5d$ matt] exi/s1 & exi/s z its necess>y condition1 :e!r our m9ds p]ceive x or n4 ,reid1 ,intellectual ,p[]s1 essay #b1 *ap4 #i--8,space is n s prop]ly an object ( s5se1 z a necess>y concomitant ( ! objects ( sight & t\*40 ,:5 we see or t\* body1 we get ! idea ( space 9 :i* ! body exi/s1 b ! idea ( space is n furni%$ by ! s5se2 x is an a priori cognition ( ! reason4 ,exp]i5ce furni%es ! occasion ( its evolution1 b ! m9d evolves ! conception by its own native en]gy4 ,anselm1 ,proslogion1 #ai--8,no?+ conta9s !e1 b ?\ conta9e/ all ?+s40 ,yet x is n precisely accurate to say t space is 9 ,god1 = ?is expression seems to intimate t ,god is a great] space :i* someh[ includes ! less4 ,god is r unspatial & is ! ,"l ( space4 ,! notion t space & ! div9e imm5sity are id5tical leads to a mat]iali/ic conception ( ,god4 ,space is n an attribute ( ,god1 z ,cl>ke ma9ta9$1 & no argum5t = ! div9e exi/5ce c be con/ruct$ f ?is premise 7see pages #he1 #hf74 ,m>t9eau1 ,types1 #a3ach1 #aci1 #agj--8,malebran*e said t ,god is ! place ( all spirits1 z space is ! place ( all bodies4444 ,desc>tes held t !re is no su* ?+ z empty space4 ,no?+ _c possibly h ext5sion4 ,:]ev] ext5sion is1 !re mu/ be some?+ ext5d$4 ,h5ce ! doctr9e ( a pl5um1 ,a vacuum is inconceivable40 ,lotze1 ,outl9es ( ,metaphysics1 #hg--8;,accord+ to ! ord9>y view 444 space exi/s1 & ?+s exi/ 9 x2 accord+ to our view1 only ?+s exi/1 & betwe5 !m no?+ exi/s1 b space exi/s 9 !m40 ,case1 ,physical ,realism1 #cgi1 #chj--8,space is ! cont9uity1 or cont9u\s ext5sion1 ( ! univ]se z "o sub/ance40 ,ladd3 8,is space ext5d$8 ,!n x mu/ be ext5d$ 9 "s o!r space4 ,t o!r space is ! space we are talk+ ab\t4 ,space !n is n an entity1 b a m5tal presupposition ( ! exi/5ce ( ext5d$ sub/ance4 ,space & "t are nei!r f9ite nor inf9ite4 ,space has nei!r circumf]5ce nor c5tre1--its c5tre w\ld be ev]y:]e4 ,we _c imag9e space at all4 ,x is simply a precondition ( m9d enabl+ u to p]ceive ?+s40 ,9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahij3dae-ddd1 art43 ,is ,space a ,reality8 ,pr(4 ,mead opposes ! doctr9e t space is purely subjective1 z taught by ,b[ne2 also ! doctr9e t space is a c]ta9 ord] ( relations among realities2 t space is no?+ ap>t f ?+s2 b t ?+s1 :5 !y exi/1 exi/ 9 c]ta9 relations1 & t ! sum1 or sy/em1 ( ^! relations con/itutes space4 ,we pref] ! view ( ,b[ne1 ,metaphysics1 #abg1 #acg1 #adc1 t 8,space is ! =m ( objective exp]i5ce1 & is no?+ 9 ab/raction f t exp]i5ce4444 ,x is a =m ( intuition1 & n a mode ( exi/5ce4 ,accord+ to ?is view1 ?+s are n 9 space & space-relations1 b appe> to be4 ,9 !mselves !y are ess5tially non-spatial2 b by _! int]actions ) "o ano!r1 & ) ! m9d1 !y give rise to ! appe>ance ( a _w ( ext5d$ ?+s 9 a common space4 ,space-pr$icates1 !n1 belong to ph5om5a only1 & n to ?+s-9-!mselves4444 ,app>5t reality exi/s spatially2 b prop] ontological reality exi/s spacelessly & )\t spatial pr$icates40 ,= ! view t space is relative1 see also ,cock]1 ,!i/ic ,conception ( ! ,_w1 #ff-if2 ,cald]wood1 ,philos4 ( ! ,inf9ite1 #cca-cce4 ,p] contra1 see ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #ffb2 ,haz>d1 ,lett]s on ,causation 9 ,will+1 app5dix2 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,oct4 #ahgg3gbc2 ,ge>1 9 ,bap4 ,rev41 ,july1 #ahhj3dcd2 ,l[ndes1 ,philos4 ( ,prim>y ,beliefs1 #add-afa4 ,second ,division4--,attributes hav+ relation to ,creation4 #a4 ,omnipres5ce4 ,by ?is we mean t ,god1 9 ! totality ( 8 ess5ce1 )\t diffusion or expansion1 multiplication or division1 p5etrates & fills ! univ]se 9 all its p>ts4 ,ps4 #aci3g sq4--8,:i!r %all ,i g f ?y ,_s8 ,or :i!r %all ,i flee f ?y pres5ce80 ,j]4 #bc3bc1 #bd--8;,am ,i a ,god at h&1 sai? ,jehovah1 & n a ,god af> (f8444 ,d n ,i fill heav5 & e>?80 ,acts #ag3bg1 #bh--8;he is n f> f ea* "o ( u3 = 9 him we live1 & move1 & h our be+40 ,fab]3 8,= ,god is nev] s f> (f ,z ev5 to be ne>4 ,he is )94 ,our _s is ,! home he holds mo/ de>4 ,to ?9k ( him z by our side ,is almo/ z untrue ,z to remove 8 %r9e beyond ,^? skies ( />ry blue4 ,s all ! :ile ,i ?\ght myself ,homeless1 =lorn & we>y1 ,miss+ my joy1 ,i walk$ ! e>? ,myself ,god's sanctu>y40 ,h5ri ,amiel3 8,f e po9t on e>? we are equally ne> to heav5 & ! inf9ite40 ,t5nyson1 ,! ,high] ,pan!ism3 8,speak to him !n1 = he he>s1 & _s ) _s c meet2 ,clos] is he ?an brea?+1 & ne>] ?an h&s & feet40 8,z full1 z p]fect1 9 a hair z he>t40 ,! a!i/ wrote3 8,god is n[h]e10 b 8 little daught] read x3 8,god is n[ "h10 & x conv]t$ him4 ,! *ild h[ev] sometimes asks3 8,if ,god is ev]y:]e1 h[ is !re any room = u80 & ! only answ] is t ,god is n a mat]ial b a spiritual be+1 ^: pres5ce does n exclude f9ite exi/5ce b r makes su* exi/5ce possible4 ,?is univ]sal pres5ce ( ,god _h to be le>n$ gradually4 ,x requir$ great fai? 9 ,abraham to g out f ,ur ( ! ,*aldees1 & yet to hold t ,god w\ld be ) him 9 a di/ant l& 7,heb4 #aa3h74 ,jacob le>n$ t ! heav5ly ladd] foll[$ him :]ev] he w5t 7,g54 #bh3ae74 ,jesus taught t 8nei!r 9 ?is m\nta91 nor 9 ,j]usalem1 %all ye wor%ip ! ,fa!r0 7,john #d3ba74 ,our ,"l's my/]i\s com+s & go+s aft] 8 resurrection 7 int5d$ to tea* 8 disciples t he 0 ) !m 8always1 ev5 unto ! end ( ! _w0 7,mat4 #bh3bj74 ,! omnipres5ce ( ,jesus demon/rates1 a =tiori1 ! omnipres5ce ( ,god4 ,9 explanation ( ?is attribute we may say3 7a7 ,god's omnipres5ce is n pot5tial b ess5tial4--,we reject ! ,soc9ian repres5tation t ,god's ess5ce is 9 heav51 only 8 p[] on e>?4 ,:5 ,god is said to 8dwell 9 ! heav5s10 we are to und]/& ! language ei!r z a symbolic expression ( exaltation above e>?ly ?+s1 or z a decl>ation t 8 mo/ special & glori\s self-manife/ations are to ! spirits ( heav54 ,ps4 #abc3a--8,o ?\ t sitte/ 9 ! heav5s02 #aac3e--8,t ha? 8 seat on high02 ,is4 #eg3ae--8! high & l(ty ,"o t inhabite? et]nity40 ,m]e pot5tial omnipres5ce is ,dei/ic z well z ,soc9ian4 ,l birds 9 ! air or fi% 9 ! sea1 8at home1 abroad1 ,we are surr\nd$ /ill ) ,god40 ,we d n ne$ to g up to heav5 to call him d[n1 or into ! abyss to call him up 7,rom4 #aj3f1 #g74 ,! be/ illu/ration is f\nd 9 ! pres5ce ( ! s\l 9 e "p ( ! body4 ,m9d seems n conf9$ to ! bra94 ,natural realism 9 philosophy1 z di/+ui%$ f idealism1 requires t ! m9d %\ld be at ! po9t ( contact ) ! out] _w1 in/ead ( hav+ reports & ideas br\ght to x 9 ! bra92 see ,port]1 ,human ,intellect1 #adi4 ,all believ]s 9 a s\l reg>d ! s\l z at lea/ pres5t 9 all p>ts ( ! bra91 & ?is is a relative omnipres5ce no less difficult 9 pr9ciple ?an its pres5ce 9 all p>ts ( ! body4 ,an animal's bra9 may be froz5 into a piece solid z ice1 yet1 aft] ?aw+1 x w act z be=e3 al?\gh freez+ ( ! :ole body w cause dea?4 ,if ! immat]ial pr9ciple 7 conf9$ to ! bra9 we %\ld expect freez+ ( ! bra9 to cause dea?4 ,b if ! s\l may be omnipres5t 9 ! body or ev5 9 ! bra91 ! div9e ,_s may be omnipres5t 9 ! univ]se4 ,b[ne1 ,metaphysics1 #acf--8;,if f9ite ?+s are modes ( ! inf9ite1 ea* ?+ mu/ be a mode ( ! entire inf9ite2 & ! inf9ite mu/ be pres5t 9 its unity & complet5ess 9 e f9ite ?+1 j z ! entire s\l is pres5t 9 all its acts40 ,?is ideali/ic conception ( ! entire m9d z pres5t 9 all its ?\ghts mu/ be reg>d$ z ! be/ analogue to ,god's omnipres5ce 9 ! univ]se4 ,we object to ! view t ?is omnipres5ce is m]ely pot5tial1 z we f9d x 9 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #gd--8,we "k1 & only "k1 t ,god is able to put =? all 8 p[] ( action1 )\t reg>d to place4444 ,omnipres5ce is an elem5t 9 ! imman5ce ( ,god4444 ,a local ,god w\ld be no real ,god4 ,if he is n ev]y:]e1 he is n true ,god any:]e4 ,omnipres5ce is impli$ 9 all provid5ce1 9 all pray]1 9 all communion ) ,god & reliance on ,god40 ,s long z x is conc$$ t consci\sness is n conf9$ to a s+le po9t 9 ! bra91 ! "q :e!r o!r portions ( ! bra9 or ( ! body are also ! seat ( consci\sness may be reg>d$ z a purely academic "o1 & ! answ] ne$ n affect our pres5t argum5t4 ,! pr9ciple ( omnipres5ce is grant$ :5 once we hold t ! s\l is consci\s at m ?an "o po9t ( ! physical organism4 ,yet ! "q sugge/$ above is an int]e/+ "o & ) reg>d to x psy*ologi/s are divid$4 ,pauls51 ,e9leitung 9 die ,philosophie 7#ahib71 #ach-aei1 holds t consci\sness is correlat$ ) ! sum-total ( bodily processes1 & ) him agree ,fe*n] & ,wundt4 8,pflg] & ,lewes say t z ! hemisph]es ( ! bra9 owe _! intellig5ce to ! consci\sness :i* we "k to be !re1 s ! intellig5ce ( ! sp9al cord's acts mu/ really be due to ! invisible pres5ce ( a consci\sness l[] 9 degree40 ,pr(essor ,brew]'s rattlesnake1 aft] sev]al h\rs ( decapitation1 /ill /ruck at him ) its bloody neck1 :5 he attempt$ to seize x by ! tail4 ,f ! reaction ( ! frog's leg aft] decapitation may we n inf] a c]ta9 consci\sness8 8,rob91 on tickl+ ! brea/ ( a crim9al an h\r aft] decapitation1 saw ! arm & h& move t[>d ! spot40 ,hudson1 ,demon/ration ( a ,future ,life1 #bci-bdi1 quotes f ,hammond1 ,treatise on ,insanity1 *apt] #b1 to prove t ! bra9 is n ! sole organ ( ! m9d4 ,in/9ct does n reside exclusively 9 ! bra92 x is seat$ 9 ! m$ulla oblongata1 or 9 ! sp9al cord1 or 9 bo? ^! organs4 ,objective m9d1 z ,hudson ?9ks1 is ! function ( ! physical bra91 & x ceases :5 ! bra9 loses its vitality4 ,in/9ctive acts are p]=m$ by animals aft] excision ( ! bra91 & by human be+s born )\t bra94 ,johnson1 9 ,&ov] ,rev41 ,april1 #ahij3dba--8,! bra9 is n ! only seat ( consci\sness4 ,! same evid5ce t po9ts to ! bra9 z ! pr9cipal seat ( consci\sness po9ts to ! n]ve-c5tres situat$ 9 ! sp9al cord or else:]e z ! seat ( a m or less subord9ate consci\sness or intellig5ce40 ,irel&1 ,blot on ! ,bra91 #bf--8;,i d n take x = prov$ t consci\sness is entirely conf9$ to ! bra940 ,9 spite ( ^! op9ions1 h[ev]1 we mu/ grant t ! g5]al cons5sus among psy*ologi/s is ^u ! o!r side4 ,dewey1 ,psy*ology1 #cdi--8,! s5sory & motor n]ves h po9ts ( meet+ 9 ! sp9al cord4 ,:5 a /imulus is transf]r$ f a s5sory n]ve to a motor )\t ! consci\s int]v5tion ( ! m9d1 we h reflex action4444 ,if some?+ approa*es ! eye1 ! /imulus is transf]r$ to ! sp9al cord1 & in/ead ( be+ cont9u$ to ! bra9 & giv+ rise to a s5sation1 x is dis*>g$ into a motor n]ve & ! eye is imm$iately clos$4444 ,! reflex action 9 itself involves no consci\sness40 ,william ,james1 ,psy*ology1 #a3af1 #ff1 #acd1 #bad--8,! cortex ( ! bra9 is ! sole organ ( consci\sness 9 man4444 ,if !re be any consci\sness p]ta9+ to ! l[] c5tres1 x is a consci\sness ( :i* ! self kn[s no?+4444 ,9 l[] animals ?is may n be s mu* ! case4444 ,! seat ( ! m9d1 s f> z its dynamical relations are conc]n$1 is some:]e 9 ! cortex ( ! bra940 ,see also ,c4 ,a4 ,/rong1 ,:y ! ,m9d has a ,body1 #dj-ej4 7b7 ,god's omnipres5ce is n ! pres5ce ( a "p b ( ! :ole ( ,god 9 e place4--,?is foll[s f ! conception ( ,god z incorporeal ,we reject ! mat]iali/ic repres5tation t ,god is compos$ ( mat]ial elem5ts :i* c be divid$ or sund]$4 ,!re is no multiplication or diffusion ( 8 sub/ance to correspond ) ! p>ts ( 8 dom9ions4 ,! "o ess5ce ( ,god is pres5t at ! same mom5t 9 all4 #a ,k+s #h3bg--8! heav5 & ! heav5 ( heav5s _c conta9 7circumscribe7 !e40 ,god mu/ be pres5t 9 all 8 ess5ce & all 8 attributes 9 e place4 ,he is 8totus 9 omni p>te40 ,alg]1 ,poetry ( ! ,ori5t3 8,?\gh ,god ext5ds beyond ,creation's rim1 ,ea* smalle/ atom holds ! :ole ( him40 ,f ?is x foll[s t ! :ole ,logos c be unit$ to & be pres5t 9 ! man ,*ri/ ,jesus1 :ile at ! same "t he fills & gov]ns ! :ole univ]se2 & s ! :ole ,*ri/ c be unit$ to1 & c be pres5t 91 ! s+le believ]1 z fully z if t believ] 7 ! only "o to receive ( 8 fulness4 ,a4 ,j4 ,gordon3 8,9 ma!matics ! :ole is equal to ! sum ( its p>ts4 ,b we "k ( ! ,_s t e "p is equal to ! :ole4 ,e *ur*1 e true body ( ,jesus ,*ri/1 has j z mu* ( ,*ri/ z e o!r1 & ea* has ! :ole ,*ri/40 ,mat4 #ac3bj--8:]e two or ?ree are ga!r$ toge!r 9 my "n1 !re am ,i 9 ! mid/ ( !m40 8,! p>i% prie/ ( au/]ity ,climb$ up 9 a high *ur* /eeple1 ,to be ne>] ,god s t he might ,h& 8 ^w d[n to ! p4 ,& 9 s]mon script he daily wrote ,:at he ?\ght 0 s5t f heav51 ,& he dropt x d[n on ! p's heads ,two times "o day 9 sev54 ,9 8 age ,god said1 #8,come d[n & die1' ,& he cri$ out f ! /eeple1 #8,:]e art ?\1 ,"l8' ,& ! ,"l repli$1 #8,d[n "h among my p4' 0 7c7 ,god's omnipres5ce is n necess>y b free4--,we reject ! pan!i/ic notion t ,god is b\nd to ! univ]se z ! univ]se is b\nd to ,god4 ,god is imman5t 9 ! univ]se1 n by compulsion1 b by ! free act ( 8 own w1 & ?is imman5ce is qualifi$ by 8 transc5d5ce4 ,god might at w cease to be omnipres5t1 = he c\ld de/roy ! univ]se2 b :ile ! univ]se exi/s1 he is & mu/ be 9 all its p>ts4 ,god is ! life & law ( ! univ]se1--?is is ! tru? 9 pan!ism4 ,b he is also p]sonal & free1--?is pan!ism d5ies4 ,*ri/ianity holds to a free1 z well z to an ess5tial1 omnipres5ce--qualifi$ & supplem5t$1 h[ev]1 by ,god's transc5d5ce4 ,! boa/$ tru? 9 pan!ism is an elem5t>y pr9ciple ( ,*ri/ianity1 & is only ! /epp+-/one to a nobl] tru?--,god's p]sonal pres5ce ) 8 *ur*4 ,! ,talmud contra/s ! wor%ip ( an idol & ! wor%ip ( ,jehovah3 8,! idol seems s ne>1 b is s f>1 ,jehovah seems s f>1 b is s ne>60 ,god's omnipres5ce assures u t he is pres5t ) u to he>1 & pres5t 9 e he>t & 9 ! ends ( ! e>? to answ]1 pray]4 ,see ,rog]s1 ,sup]human ,orig9 ( ! ,bible1 #aj2 ,b[ne1 ,metaphysics1 #acf2 ,*>nock1 ,attributes1 #a3cfc-dje4 ,! ,puritan turn$ f ! moss-rose bud1 say+3 8,i h le>n$ to call no?+ on e>? lovely40 ,b ?is is to despise n only ! workman%ip b ! pres5ce ( ! ,almighty4 ,! lea/ ?+ 9 nature is wor?y ( /udy because x is ! revelation ( a pres5t ,god4 ,! uni=mity ( nature & ! reign ( law are no?+ b ! /eady w ( ! omnipres5t ,god4 ,gravitation is ,god's omnipres5ce 9 space1 z evolution is ,god's omnipres5ce 9 "t4 ,dorn]1 ,sy/em ( ,doctr9e1 #a3gc-8;,god be+ omnipres5t1 contact ) him may be s\ght at any mom5t 9 pray] & contemplation2 inde$1 x w always be true t we live & move & h our be+ 9 him1 z ! p]5nial & omnipres5t s\rce ( our exi/5ce40 ,rom4 #aj3f-h--8,say n 9 ?y he>t1 ,:o %all asc5d into heav58 7t is1 to br+ ,*ri/ d[n37 or1 ,:o %all desc5d into ! abyss8 7t is1 to br+ ,*ri/ up f ! dead47 ,b :at sai? x8 ,! ^w is nigh !e1 9 ?y m\?1 & 9 ?y he>t40 ,lotze1 ,metaphysics1 #bef1 quot$ 9 ,ill+wor?1 ,div9e ,imman5ce1 #ace1 #acf4 ,sunday-s*ool s*ol>3 8,is ,god 9 my pocket80 8,c]ta9ly40 8,no1 he isn't1 = ,i hav5't any pocket40 ,god is omnipres5t s long z !re is a univ]se1 b he ceases to be omnipres5t :5 ! univ]se ceases to be4 #b4 ,omnisci5ce4 ,by ?is we mean ,god's p]fect & et]nal k ( all ?+s :i* are objects ( k1 :e!r !y be actual or possible1 pa/1 pres5t1 or future4 ,god kn[s 8 inanimate creation3 ,ps4 #adg3d--8;c\nte? ! numb] ( ! />s2 ,he calle? !m all by _! names40 ,he has k ( brute creatures3 ,mat4 #aj3bi--sp>r[s--8n "o ( !m %all fall on ! gr\nd )\t y\r ,fa!r40 ,( m5 & _! works3 ,ps4 #cc3ac-ae--8;beholde? all ! sons ( m5 444 consid]e? all _! works40 ,( he>ts ( m5 & _! ?\ghts3 ,acts #ae3h--8;,god1 :o kn[e? ! he>t02 ,ps4 #aci3b--8und]/&e/ my ?\ght af> (f40 ,( our wants3 ,mat4 #f3h--8kn[e? :at ?+s ye h ne$ (40 ,( ! lea/ ?+s3 ,mat4 #aj3cj--8! v hairs ( y\r head are all numb]$40 ,( ! pa/3 ,mal4 #c3af--8;book ( remembrance40 ,( ! future3 ,is4 #df3i1 #aj--8;decl>+ ! end f ! beg9n+40 ,( m5's future free acts3 ,is4 #dd3bh--8t sai? ( ,cyrus1 ,he is my %eph]d & %all p]=m all my pleasure40 ,( m5's future evil acts3 ,acts #b3bc--8;him1 be+ deliv]$ up by ! det]m9ate c\nsel & =ekn[l$ge ( ,god40 ,( ! ideally possible3 #a ,sam4 #bc3ab--8,w ! m5 ( ,keilah deliv] up me & my m5 into ! h&s ( ,saul8 ,& ,jehovah said1 ,!y w deliv] !e up0 7sc4 if ?\ rema9e/72 ,mat4 #aa3bc--8;if ! mighty works _h be5 done 9 ,sodom :i* 7 done 9 !e1 x w\ld h rema9$40 ,f et]nity3 ,acts #ae3ah--8! ,"l1 :o make? ^! ?+s kn[n f ( old40 ,incompreh5sible3 ,ps4 #aci3f--8,su* k is too wond]ful = me02 ,rom4 #aa3cc--8,o ! dep? ( ! ri*es bo? ( ! wisdom & ! k ( ,god40 ,relat$ to wisdom3 ,ps4 #ajd3bd--8;,9 wisdom ha/ ?\ made !m all02 ,eph4 #c3aj--8manifold wisdom ( ,god40 ,job #g3bj--8,o ?\ wat*] ( m502 ,ps4 #ef3h--8,?\ numb]e/ my w&]+s0 my :ole life has be5 "o cont9u\s exile2 8,put ?\ my te>s into ?y bottle0 ! sk9 bottle ( ! ea/1--!re are te>s en\gh to fill "o2 8,are !y n 9 ?y book80 no te> has fall5 to ! gr\nd unnot$1--,god has ga!r$ !m all4 ,paul ,g]h>dt3 8,du zhl/ wie (t e9 ,*ri/e we9'1 ,und 0 se9 ,kumm] sei2 ,ke9 /illes ,?rnle9 i/ s kle91 ,du heb/ und leg/ es bei40 ,heb4 #d3ac--8!re is no creature t is n manife/ 9 8 sight3 b all ?+s are nak$ & laid op5 be=e ! eyes ( him ) :om we h to d0----) head b5t back & neck laid b>e1 z animals slaught]$ 9 sacrifice1 or seiz$ by ! ?roat & ?r[n on ! back1 s t ! prie/ might discov] :e!r !re 0 any blemi%4 ,japanese prov]b3 8,god has =gott5 to =get40 7a7 ,! omnisci5ce ( ,god may be argu$ f 8 omnipres5ce1 z well z f 8 tru? or self-k1 9 :i* ! plan ( creation has its et]nal gr\nd1 & f prophecy1 :i* expresses ,god's omnisci5ce4 ,x is to be rememb]$ t omnisci5ce1 z ! designation ( a relative & transitive attribute1 does n include ,god's self-k4 ,! t]m is us$ 9 ! te*nical s5se ( ,god's k ( all ?+s t p]ta9 to ! univ]se ( 8 creation4 ,h4 ,a4 ,gordon3 8,light travels fa/] ?an s\nd4 ,y c see ! fla% ( fire f ! cannon's m\?1 a mile away1 consid]ably be=e ! noise ( ! dis*>ge rea*es ! e>4 ,god fla%$ ! light ( pr$iction ^u ! pages ( 8 ^w1 & we see x4 ,wait a little & we see ! ev5t itself40 ,royce1 ,! ,conception ( ,god1 #i--8;,an omnisci5t be+ w\ld be "o :o simply f\nd pres5t$ to him1 n by virtue ( fragm5t>y & gradually complet$ processes ( inquiry1 b by virtue ( an all-embrac+1 direct & transp>5t insight into 8 own tru?--:o f\nd ?us pres5t$ to him1 ,i say1 ! complete1 ! fulfill$ answ] to e g5u9ely rational "q40 ,br[n+1 ,f]i%tah's ,fancies1 ,plot-culture3 8,h[ w x f>e %\ld/ ?\ impress on me ,t c]ta9ly an ,eye is ov] all ,& ea*1 to make ! m9ute's de$1 ^w1 ?\ght ,z wor?y ( rew>d & puni%m5t8 ,%all ,i p]mit my s5se an ,eye-view$ %ame1 ,broad daylight p]petration1--s to speak1--,i _h n d>$ to brea! )9 ! ,e>1 ,) black night's help ar\nd me80 7b7 ,s9ce x is free f all imp]fection1 ,god's k is imm$iate1 z di/+ui%$ f ! k t comes ?r\gh s5se or imag9ation2 simultane\s1 z n acquir$ by successive obs]vations1 or built up by processes ( reason+2 di/9ct1 z free f all vagu5ess or confusion2 true1 z p]fectly correspond+ to ! reality ( ?+s2 et]nal1 z compreh5d$ 9 "o timeless act ( ! div9e m9d4 ,an inf9ite m9d mu/ always act1 & mu/ always act 9 an absolutely p]fect mann]4 ,!re is 9 ,god no s5se1 symbol1 memory1 ab/raction1 gr[?1 reflection1 reason+1--8 k is all direct & )\t int]m$i>ies4 ,god 0 prop]ly repres5t$ by ! anci5t ,egyptians1 n z hav+ eye1 b z be+ eye4 ,8 ?\ghts t[>d u are 8m ?an c be numb]$0 7,ps4 #dj3e71 n because !re is succession 9 !m1 n[ a rememb]+ & n[ a =gett+1 b because !re is nev] a mom5t ( our exi/5ce 9 :i* we are out ( 8 m9d2 he is always ?9k+ ( u4 ,see ,*>nock1 ,attributes1 #a3djf-dig4 ,g54 #af3ac--8,?\ art a ,god t see?40 ,miv>t1 ,lessons f ,nature1 #cgd--8;,e creature ( e ord] ( exi/5ce1 :ile its exi/5ce is su/a9$1 is s complac5tly contemplat$ by ,god1 t ! int5se & conc5trat$ att5tion ( all m5 ( sci5ce toge!r ^u x c\ld b =m an utt]ly inadequate symbol ( su* div9e contemplation40 ,s ,god's scrut9y ( e de$ ( d>kness is m se>*+ ?an ! gaze ( a :ole ,coliseum ( spectators1 & 8 eye is m wat*ful ov] ! good ?an w\ld be ! unit$ c>e ( all 8 ho/s 9 heav5 & e>?4 ,arm/rong1 ,god & ! ,s\l3 8,god's en]gy is conc5trat$ att5tion1 att5tion conc5trat$ ev]y:]e4 ,we c att5d to two or ?ree ?+s at once2 ! piani/ plays & talks at ! same "t2 ! magician does "o ?+ :ile he seems to d ano!r4 ,god att5ds to all ?+s1 does all ?+s1 at once40 ,m>ie ,corelli1 ,ma/] ,*ri/ian1 #ajd--8,! biograph is a h9t t e sc5e ( human life is reflect$ 9 a ceaseless mov+ panorama "s :]e1 = ! behold+ ( "s "o40 ,wireless telegraphy is a /up5d\s w>n+ t f ,god no secrets are hid1 t 8!re is no?+ cov]$ t %all n be reveal$2 & hid1 t %all n be kn[n0 7,mat4 #aj3bf74 ,! ,rntg5 rays1 :i* take photographs ( our insides1 "r ?r\gh our clo!s1 & ev5 9 ! d>kness ( midnight1 %[ t to ,god 8! night %9e? z ! day0 7,ps4 #aci3ab74 ,pr(essor ,mit*el's equatorial telescope1 sl[ly mov+ by clockwork1 t[>d sunset1 sudd5ly t\*$ ! horizon & disclos$ a boy 9 a tree /eal+ apples1 b ! boy 0 all unconsci\s t he 0 "u ! gaze ( ! a/ronom]4 ,no?+ 0 s fe>ful to ! prison] 9 ! ,fr5* ca*ot z ! eye ( ! gu>d t nev] ceas$ to wat* him 9 p]fect sil5ce ?r\gh ! loophole 9 ! door4 ,z 9 ! ,roman empire ! :ole _w 0 to a malefactor "o great prison1 & 9 8 flight to ! mo/ di/ant l&s ! emp]or c\ld track him1 s "u ! gov]nm5t ( ,god no s9n] c escape ! eye ( 8 ,judge4 ,b omnipres5ce is protective z well z detective4 ,! text ,g54 #af3ac--8,?\1 ,god1 see/ me0--has be5 us$ z a re/ra9t f evil m ?an z a /imulus to good4 ,to ! *ild ( ! devil x %\ld c]ta9ly be ! =m]4 ,b to ! *ild ( ,god x %\ld z c]ta9ly be ! latt]4 ,god %\ld n be reg>d$ z an exact+ ov]se] or a /&+ ?reat1 b r z "o :o und]/&s u1 loves u1 & helps u4 ,ps4 #aci3ag1 #ah--8;,h[ preci\s also are ?y ?\ghts unto me1 ,o ,god6 ,h[ great is ! sum ( !m6 ,if ,i %\ld c\nt !m1 !y are m 9 numb] ?an ! s&3 ,:5 ,i awake1 ,i am /ill ) !e40 7c7 ,s9ce ,god kn[s ?+s z !y are1 he kn[s ! necess>y sequ5ces ( 8 creation z necess>y1 ! free acts ( 8 creatures z free1 ! ideally possible z ideally possible4 ,god kn[s :at w\ld h tak5 place "u circum/ances n n[ pres5t2 kn[s :at ! univ]se w\ld h be51 _h he *os5 a diff]5t plan ( creation2 kn[s :at our lives w\ld h be51 _h we made diff]5t decisions 9 ! pa/ 7,is4 #dh3ah--8,oh t ?\ had/ he>k5$ 444 !n _h ?y peace be5 z a riv]074 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #gg--8;,god has a d\ble k ( 8 univ]se4 ,he kn[s x z x exi/s et]nally 9 8 m9d1 z 8 own idea2 & he kn[s x z actually exi/+ 9 "t & space1 a mov+1 *ang+1 gr[+ univ]se1 ) p]petual process ( succession4 ,9 8 own idea1 he kn[s x all at once2 b he is also aw>e ( its p]petual becom+1 & ) ref]5ce to ev5ts z !y occur he has =ekn[l$ge1 pres5t k1 & k aft]w>ds4444 ,he conceives ( all ?+s simultane\sly1 b obs]ves all ?+s 9 _! succession40 ,royce1 ,_w & ,individual1 #b3cgd--;holds t ,god does n temporally =ekn[ any?+ except z he is express$ 9 f9ite be+s1 b yet t ! ,absolute possesses a p]fect k at "o glance ( ! :ole ( ! temporal ord]1 pres5t1 pa/ & future4 ,?is1 he says1 is n =ekn[l$ge1 b et]nal k4 ,prie/ley d5i$ t any cont+5t ev5t c\ld be an object ( k4 ,b ,reid says ! d5ial t any free action c be =ese5 involves ! d5ial ( ,god's own free ag5cy1 s9ce ,god's future actions c be =ese5 by m52 also t :ile ,god =esees 8 own free actions1 ?is does n det]m9e ^? actions necess>ily4 ,t5nyson1 ,9 ,memoriam1 #bf--8;,& if t eye :i* wat*es guilt ,& goodness1 & ha? p[] to see ,)9 ! gre5 ! m\ld]$ tree1 ,& t[]s fall5 z soon z built--,oh1 if inde$ t eye =esee ,or see 79 ,him is no be=e7 ,9 m ( life true life no m ,& ,love ! indiff]5ce to be1 ,!n might ,i f9d1 ere yet ! morn ,breaks hi!r ov] ,indian seas1 ,t ,%ad[ wait+ ) ! keys1 ,to %r\d me f my prop] scorn40 7d7 ,! fact t !re is no?+ 9 ! pres5t condition ( ?+s f :i* ! future actions ( free creatures necess>ily foll[ by natural law does n prev5t ,god f =esee+ su* actions1 s9ce 8 k is n m$iate1 b imm$iate4 ,he n only =ekn[s ! motives :i* w occasion m5's acts1 b he directly =ekn[s ! acts !mselves4 ,! possibility ( su* direct k )\t assignable gr\nds ( k is app>5t if we admit t "t is a =m ( f9ite ?\ght to :i* ! div9e m9d is n subject4 ,ari/otle ma9ta9$ t !re is no c]ta9 k ( cont+5t future ev5ts4 ,soc9us1 9 l mann]1 :ile he admitt$ t ,god kn[s all ?+s t are kn[able1 abridg$ ! objects ( ! div9e k by )draw+ f ! numb] ^? objects ^: future exi/5ce he consid]$ z unc]ta91 su* z ! det]m9ations ( free ag5ts4 ,^!1 he held1 _c be c]ta9ly =ekn[n1 because !re is no?+ 9 ! pres5t condition ( ?+s f :i* !y w necess>ily foll[ by natural law4 ,! man :o makes a clock c tell :5 x w /rike4 ,b free-w1 n be+ subject to me*anical laws1 _c h its acts pr$ict$ or =ekn[n4 ,god kn[s ?+s only 9 _! causes--future ev5ts only 9 _! antec$5ts4 ,john ,milton seems also to d5y ,god's =ekn[l$ge ( free acts3 8,s1 )\t lea/ impulse or %ad[ ( fate1 ,or aught by me immutably =ese51 ,!y trespass40 ,) ?is ,soc9ian doctr9e "s ,arm9ians agree1 z ,mc,cabe1 9 8 ,=ekn[l$ge ( ,god1 & 9 8 ,div9e ,nesci5ce ( ,future ,cont+5cies a ,necessity4 ,mc,cabe1 h[ev]1 sacrifices ! pr9ciple ( free w1 9 def5ce ( :i* he makes ?is surr5d] ( ,god's =ekn[l$ge1 by say+ t 9 cases ( fulfill$ prophecy1 l ,pet]'s d5ial & ,judas's betrayal1 ,god br\ght special influ5ces to be> to secure ! result1--s t ,pet]'s & ,judas's wills act$ irresponsibly "u ! law ( cause & effect4 ,he quotes ,dr4 ,daniel ,curry z decl>+ t 8! d5ial ( absolute div9e =ekn[l$ge is ! ess5tial complem5t ( ! ,me?odi/ !ology1 )\t :i* its philosophical incomplet5ess is def5celess aga9/ ! logical consi/5cy ( ,calv9ism40 ,see also article by ,mc,cabe 9 ,me?odi/ ,review1 ,sept4 #ahib3gfj-ggc4 ,also ,simon1 ,reconciliation1 #bhg--8;,god has con/itut$ a creature1 ! actions ( :i* he c only "k z su* :5 !y are p]=m$4 ,9 pres5ce ( man1 to a c]ta9 ext5t1 ev5 ! great ,god condesc5ds to wait2 nay m1 has himself s orda9$ ?+s t he mu/ wait1 inquir+1 #8,:at w he d8' 0 ,s ,dugald ,/ew>t3 8,%all we v5ture to affirm t x exce$s ! p[] ( ,god to p]mit su* a tra9 ( cont+5t ev5ts to take place z 8 own =ekn[l$ge %all n ext5d to80 ,m>t5s5 holds ?is view1 & ,ro!1 ,!ologis*e ,e?ik1 #a3bab-bcd1 :o decl>es t ! free *oices ( m5 are cont9ually increas+ ! k ( ,god4 ,s also ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy ( ,religion1 #b3bgi--8,! belief 9 ! div9e =ekn[l$ge ( our future has no basis 9 philosophy4 ,we no long] deem x true t ev5 ,god kn[s ! mom5t ( my moral life t is com+ next4 ,ev5 he does n "k :e!r ,i %all yield to ! secret temptation at midday4 ,to him life is a drama ( :i* he kn[s n ! conclusion40 ,!n1 says ,dr4 ,a4 ,j4 ,gordon1 !re is no?+ s dre>y & dreadful z to be liv+ "u ! direction ( su* a ,god4 ,! univ]se is ru%+ on l an express-tra9 9 ! d>kness )\t headlight or eng9e]2 at any mom5t we may be plung$ into ! abyss4 ,lotze does n d5y ,god's =ekn[l$ge ( free human actions1 b he reg>ds z insoluble by ! intellect ! problem ( ! relation ( "t to ,god1 & su* =ekn[l$ge z 8"o ( ^? po/ulates z to :i* we "k n h[ !y c be fulfill$40 ,b[ne1 ,philosophy ( ,!ism1 #aei--8;,=ekn[l$ge ( a free act is a k )\t assignable gr\nds ( kn[+4 ,on ! assumption ( a real "t1 x is h>d to f9d a way out ( ?is difficulty4444 ,! doctr9e ( ! ideality ( "t helps u by sugge/+ ! possibility ( an all-embrac+ pres5t1 or an et]nal n[1 = ,god4 ,9 t case ! problem vani%es ) "t1 its condition40 ,aga9/ ! doctr9e ( ! div9e nesci5ce we urge n only our fundam5tal conviction ( ,god's p]fection1 b ! con/ant te/imony ( ,scripture4 ,9 ,is4 #da3ba1 #bb1 ,god makes 8 =ekn[l$ge ! te/ ( 8 ,godhead 9 ! controv]sy ) idols4 ,if ,god _c =ekn[ free human acts1 !n 8! ,lamb t ha? be5 sla9 f ! f\ndation ( ! _w0 7,rev4 #ac3h7 0 only a sacrifice to be (f]$ 9 case ,adam %\ld fall1 ,god n kn[+ :e!r he w\ld or n1 & 9 case ,judas %\ld betray ,*ri/1 ,god n kn[+ :e!r he w\ld or n4 ,inde$1 s9ce ! c\rse ( nature is *ang$ by man's w :5 he burns t[ns & fells =e/s1 ,god _c on ?is !ory pr$ict ev5 ! c\rse ( nature4 ,all prophecy is !re=e a prote/ aga9/ ?is view4 ,h[ ,god =ekn[s free human decisions we may n be able to say1 b !n ! me?od ( ,god's k 9 _m o!r respects is unkn[n to u4 ,! foll[+ explanations h be5 propos$4 ,god may =ekn[ free acts3-- #a4 ,m$iately1 by =ekn[+ ! motives ( ^! acts1 & ?is ei!r because ^! motives induce ! acts1 7#a7 necess>ily1 or 7#b7 c]ta9ly4 ,?is la/ 8c]ta9ly0 is to be accept$1 if ei!r2 s9ce motives are nev] causes1 b are only occasions1 ( action4 ,! cause is ! w1 or ! man himself4 ,b x may be said t =ekn[+ acts ?r\gh _! motives is n =ekn[+ at all1 b is reason+ or inf]5ce r4 ,moreov]1 al?\gh intellig5t be+s commonly act accord+ to motives previ\sly dom9ant1 !y also at critical epo*s1 z at ! fall ( ,satan & ( ,adam1 *oose betwe5 motives1 & 9 su* cases k ( ! motives :i* h hi!rto actuat$ !m gives no clue to _! next decisions4 ,ano!r /atem5t is !re=e propos$ to meet ^! difficulties1 namely1 t ,god may =ekn[ free acts3-- #b4 ,imm$iately1 by pure intuition1 inexplicable to u4 ,julius ,mll]1 ,doctr9e ( ,s91 #b3bjc1 #bbe--8;,if ,god c "k a future ev5t z c]ta9 only by a calculation ( causes1 x mu/ be all[$ t he _c ) c]ta9ty =ekn[ any free act ( man2 = 8 =ekn[l$ge w\ld !n be pro( t ! act 9 "q 0 ! necess>y consequ5ce ( c]ta9 causes1 & 0 n 9 itself free4 ,if1 on ! contr>y1 ! div9e k be reg>d$ z intuitive1 we see t x /&s 9 ! same imm$iate relation to ! act itself z to its antec$5ts1 & ?us ! difficulty is remov$40 ,ev5 ^u ?is view !re /ill rema9s ! difficulty ( p]ceiv+ h[ !re c be 9 ,god's m9d a subjective c]titude ) reg>d to acts 9 respect to :i* !re is no assignable objective gr\nd ( c]ta9ty4 ,yet1 9 spite ( ?is difficulty1 we feel b\nd bo? by ,scripture & by our fundam5tal idea ( ,god's p]fection to ma9ta9 ,god's p]fect k ( ! future free acts ( 8 creatures4 ,) ,presid5t ,pepp] we say3 8,k ( cont+5cy is n necess>ily cont+5t k40 ,) ,:$on3 8,x is n calculation1 b pure k40 ,see ,dorn]1 ,sy/em ( ,doct41 #a3ccb-ccg2 #b3eh-fb2 ,jahrbu* fr deuts*e ,!ologie1 #aheh3fja-fje2 ,*>nock1 ,attributes1 #a3dbi-ddf2 ,solly1 ,! ,w1 #bdj-bed4 ,= a valuable article on ! :ole subject1 ?\gh advocat+ ! view t ,god =ekn[s acts by =ekn[+ motives1 see ,bib4 ,sac41 ,oct4 #ahhc3fee-fid4 ,see also ,hill1 ,div9ity1 #eag4 7e7 ,presci5ce is n itself causative4 ,x is n to be conf\nd$ ) ! pr$et]m9+ w ( ,god4 ,free actions d n take place because !y are =ese51 b !y are =ese5 because !y are to take place4 ,see+ a ?+ 9 ! future does n cause x to be1 m ?an see+ a ?+ 9 ! pa/ causes x to be4 ,z to future ev5ts1 we may say ) ,:$on3 8,k takes !m1 n makes !m40 ,=ekn[l$ge may1 & does1 presuppose pr$et]m9ation1 b x is n itself pr$et]m9ation4 ,?omas ,aqu9as1 9 8 ,summa1 #a3ch3a3a1 says t 8! k ( ,god is ! cause ( ?+s02 b he is oblig$ to add3 8,god is n ! cause ( all ?+s t are kn[n by ,god1 s9ce evil ?+s t are kn[n by ,god are n f him40 ,john ,milton1 ,p>adise ,lo/1 book #c--8;,=ekn[l$ge _h no influ5ce on _! fault1 ,:i* _h no less prov$ c]ta9 un=ekn[n40 7f7 ,omnisci5ce embraces ! actual & ! possible1 b x does n embrace ! self-contradictory & ! impossible1 because ^! are n objects ( k4 ,god does n "k :at ! result w\ld be if two & two made five1 nor does he "k 8:e!r a *imra rum9at+ 9 a vacuum dev\re? second int5tions02 & t1 simply = ! reason t he _c "k self-contradiction & nons5se4 ,^! ?+s are n objects ( k4 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #hj--8;,c ,god make an old man 9 a m9ute8 ,c\ld he make x well ) ! wick$ :ile !y rema9$ wick$8 ,c\ld he create a _w 9 :i* #b #b #e80 ,royce1 ,_s ( ,mod]n ,philosophy1 #cff--8;,does ,god "k ! :ole numb] t is ! squ>e root ( #fe8 or :at adjac5t hills !re are t h no valleys betwe5 !m8 ,does ,god "k r\nd squ>es1 & sug> salt-lumps1 & ,sn>ks & ,boojums & ,abracadabras80 7g7 ,omnisci5ce1 z qualifi$ by holy w1 is 9 ,scripture d5om9at$ 8wisdom40 ,9 virtue ( 8 wisdom ,god *ooses ! highe/ ends & uses ! fitte/ means to accompli% !m4 ,wisdom is n simply 8e/imat+ all ?+s at _! prop] value0 7,olm/ead72 x has 9 x also ! elem5t ( c\nsel & purpose4 ,x has be5 def9$ z 8! tal5t ( us+ "o's tal5ts40 ,x implies two ?+s3 fir/1 *oice ( ! highe/ end2 secondly1 *oice ( ! be/ means to secure ?is end4 ,j4 ,c4 ,c4 ,cl>ke1 ,self & ! ,fa!r1 #ci--8,wisdom is n inv5t$ conceptions1 or h>mony ( !ories ) !ories2 b is humble ob$i5ce ( m9d to ! reception ( facts t are f\nd 9 ?+s40 ,?us man's wisdom1 ob$i5ce1 fai?1 are all names = diff]5t aspects ( ! same ?+4 ,& wisdom 9 ,god is ! moral *oice :i* makes tru? & hol9ess supreme4 ,b[ne1 ,pr9ciples ( ,e?ics1 #bfa--8,socialism pursues a laudable end by unwise or de/ructive means4 ,x is n en\gh to mean well4 ,our me?ods mu/ take "s acc\nt ( ! nature ( ?+s1 if !y are to succe$4 ,we _c produce well-be+ by law4 ,no legislation c remove inequalities ( nature & con/itution4 ,society _c produce equality1 any m ?an x c enable a rh9oc]os to s+1 or legislate a cat into a lion40 #c4 ,omnipot5ce4 ,by ?is we mean ! p[] ( ,god to d all ?+s :i* are objects ( p[]1 :e!r ) or )\t ! use ( means4 ,g54 #ag3a--8;,i am ,god ,almighty40 ,he p]=ms natural wond]s3 ,g54 #a3a-c--8,let !re be ,light02 ,is4 #dd3bd--8/ret*e? =? ! heav5s alone02 ,heb4 #a3c--8uphold+ all ?+s by ! ^w ( 8 p[]40 ,spiritual wond]s3 #b ,cor4 #d3f--8;,god1 t said1 ,light %all %9e out ( d>kness1 :o %9$ 9 our he>ts02 ,eph4 #a3ai--8;exce$+ greatness ( 8 p[] to u-w>d :o believe02 ,eph4 #c3bj--8;able to d exce$+ abundantly40 ,p[] to create new ?+s3 ,mat4 #c3i--8;able ( ^! /ones to raise up *ildr5 unto ,abraham04 ,rom4 #d3ag--8;give? life to ! dead1 & calle? ! ?+s t are n1 z ?\gh !y 740 ,aft] 8 own pleasure3 ,ps4 #aae3c--8;,he ha? done :atsoev] he ha? pleas$02 ,eph4 #a3aa--8worke? all ?+s aft] ! c\nsel ( 8 w40 ,no?+ impossible3 ,g5 #ah3ad--8;,is any?+ too h>d = ,jehovah80 ,mat4 #ai3bf--8) ,god all ?+s are possible40 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #gc--8;,if all p[] 9 ! univ]se is dep5d5t on 8 creative w = its exi/5ce1 x is impossible to conceive any limit to 8 p[] except t laid on x by 8 own w4 ,b ?is is only negative pro(2 absolute omnipot5ce is n logically demon/rable1 ?\gh readily en\gh recogniz$ z a j conception ( ! inf9ite ,god1 :5 prop\nd$ on ! au?ority ( a positive revelation40 ,! omnipot5ce ( ,god is illu/rat$ by ! "w ( ! ,holy ,_s1 :i* 9 ,scripture is comp>$ to w9d1 wat] & fire4 ,! ord9>y manife/ations ( ^! elem5ts af=d no crit]ion ( ! effects !y are able to produce4 ,! ru%+ mighty w9d at ,p5teco/ 0 ! analogue ( ! w9d-,_s :o bore ev]y?+ be=e him on ! fir/ day ( creation 7,g54 #a3b2 ,john #c3h2 ,acts #b3b74 ,! p\r+ out ( ! ,_s is lik5$ to ! flood ( ,noah :5 ! w9d[s ( heav5 7 op5$ & !re 0 n room en\gh to receive t :i* fell 7,mal4 #c3aj74 ,& ! baptism ( ! ,holy ,_s is l ! fire t %all de/roy all impurity at ! end ( ! _w 7,mat4 #c3aa2 #b ,pet4 #c3g-ac74 ,see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #cjg-caj4 7a7 ,omnipot5ce does n imply p[] to d t :i* is n an object ( p[]2 z1 = example1 t :i* is self-contradictory or contradictory to ! nature ( ,god4 ,self-contradictory ?+s3 8fac]e factum infectum0--! mak+ ( a pa/ ev5t to h n occurr$ 7h5ce ! uselessness ( pray+3 8,may x be t mu* good 0 done072 draw+ a %ort] ?an a /raight l9e betwe5 two giv5 po9ts2 putt+ two sep>ate m\nta9s toge!r )\t a valley betwe5 !m4 ,?+s contradictory to ! nature ( ,god3 = ,god to lie1 to s91 to die4 ,to d su* ?+s w\ld n imply p[]1 b impot5ce4 ,god has all ! p[] t is consi/5t ) inf9ite p]fection--all p[] to d :at is wor?y ( himself4 ,s no great] ?+ c be said by man ?an ?is3 8,i d>e d all t may become a man2 ,:o d>es d m is none40 ,ev5 ,god _c make wrong to be "r1 nor hatr$ ( himself to be bless$4 ,"s h held t ! prev5tion ( s9 9 a moral sy/em is n an object ( p[]1 & !re=e t ,god _c prev5t s9 9 a moral sy/em4 ,we hold ! contr>y2 see ?is ,comp5dium3 ,objections to ! ,doctr9e ( ,decrees4 ,dryd51 ,imitation ( ,horace1 #c3bi3ga--8,ov] ! pa/ n heav5 itself has p[]2 ,:at has be5 has1 & ,i h _h my h\r0--words appli$ by ,"l ,john ,russell to 8 own c>e]4 ,em]son1 ,! ,pa/3 8,all is n[ secure & fa/1 ,n ! gods c %ake ! ,pa/40 ,sunday-s*ool s*ol>3 8,say1 tea*]1 c ,god make a rock s big t he c't lift x80 ,sem9>y ,pr(essor3 8,c ,god tell a lie80 ,sem9>y /ud5t3 8,) ,god all ?+s are possible40 7b7 ,omnipot5ce does n imply ! ex]cise ( all 8 p[] on ! "p ( ,god4 ,he has p[] ov] 8 p[]2 9 o!r words1 8 p[] is "u ! control ( wise & holy w4 ,god c d all he w1 b he w n d all he c4 ,else 8 p[] is m]e =ce act+ necess>ily1 & ,god is ! slave ( 8 own omnipot5ce4 ,s*lei]ma*] held t nature n only is gr\nd$ 9 ! div9e causality1 b fully expresses t causality2 !re is no causative p[] 9 ,god = any?+ t is n real & actual4 ,?is doctr9e does n ess5tially diff] f ,sp9oza's natura naturans & natura naturata4 ,see ,philippi1 ,glaub5slehre1 #b3fb-ff4 ,b omnipot5ce is n in/9ctive2 x is a p[] us$ accord+ to ,god's pleasure4 ,god is by no means encompass$ by ! laws ( nature1 or %ut up to a necess>y evolution ( 8 own be+1 z pan!ism supposes4 ,z ,ro! has %[n1 ,god has a w-p[] ov] 8 nature-p[]1 & is n compell$ to d all t he c d4 ,he is able f ! /ones ( ! /reet to 8raise up *ildr5 unto ,abraham10 b he has n done x4 ,9 ,god are unop5$ treasures1 an inexhau/ible f\nta9 ( new beg9n+s1 new creations1 new revelations4 ,to suppose t 9 creation he has exp5d$ all ! inn] possibilities ( 8 be+ is to d5y 8 omnipot5ce4 ,s ,job #bf3ad--8,lo1 ^! are b ! outskirts ( 8 ways3 ,& h[ small a :isp] d we he> ( him6 ,b ! ?und] ( 8 p[] :o c und]/&80 ,see ,rog]s1 ,sup]human ,orig9 ( ! ,bible1 #aj2 ,hodgson1 ,"t & ,space1 #egi1 #ehj4 #a ,pet4 #e3f--8;,humble y\rselves !re=e "u ! mighty h& ( ,god0--8 mighty h& ( provid5ce1 salvation1 bless+--8t he may exalt y 9 due "t2 ca/+ all y\r anxiety ^u him1 because he c>e? = y40 8,! mighty p[]s held "u mighty control0--?is is ! greate/ exhibition ( p[]4 ,unre/ra9t is n ! highe/ fre$om4 ,"y m5 mu/ le>n t self-re/ra9t is ! true p[]4 ,prov4 #af3cb--8;,he t is sl[ to ang] is bett] ?an ! mighty2 ,& he t rule? 8 _s1 ?an he t take? a city40 ,%akespe>e1 ,coriolanus1 #b3c--8,we h p[] 9 ourselves to d x1 b x is a p[] t we h no p[] to d40 ,:5 dynamite goes (f1 x all goes (f3 !re is no res]ve4 ,god uses z mu* ( 8 p[] z he pleases3 ! rema9d] ( wra? 9 himself1 z well z 9 o!rs1 he re/ra9s4 7c7 ,omnipot5ce 9 ,god does n exclude1 b implies1 ! p[] ( self-limitation4 ,s9ce all su* self-limitation is free1 proce$+ f nei!r ext]nal nor int]nal compulsion1 x is ! act & manife/ation ( ,god's p[]4 ,human fre$om is n r5d]$ impossible by ! div9e omnipot5ce1 b exi/s by virtue ( x4 ,x is an act ( omnipot5ce :5 ,god humbles himself to ! tak+ ( human fle% 9 ! p]son ( ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,?omasius3 8,if ,god is to be ov] all & 9 all1 he _c himself be all40 ,ps4 #aac3 #e1 #f--8,:o is l unto ,jehovah our ,god4444 ,t humble? himself to behold ! ?+s t are 9 heav5 & 9 ! e>?80 ,phil4 #b3g1 #h--8;empti$ himself 444 humbl$ himself40 ,see ,*>nock1 ,attributes1 #b3e-ajg4 ,presid5t ,woolsey %[$ true p[] :5 he controll$ 8 indignation & let an (f5d+ /ud5t g free4 ,( ,*ri/ on ! cross1 says ,mob]ly1 ,atonem5t & ,p]sonality1 #aaf--8;,x 0 ! p[] to reta9 8 life1 to escape suff]+1 ) ! w to hold x unus$1 :i* prov$ him to be :at he 01 ! ob$i5t & p]fect man40 ,we are like/ ! omnipot5t ,"o :5 we limit ourselves = love's sake4 ,! attribute ( omnipot5ce is ! gr\nd ( tru/1 z well z ( fe>1 on ! "p ( ,god's creatures4 ,isaac ,watts3 8,8 e ^w ( grace is /rong ,z t :i* built ! skies2 ,! voice t rolls ! />s along ,speaks all ! promises40 ,?ird ,division4--,attributes hav+ relation to ,moral ,be+s4 #a4 ,v]acity & ,fai?fulness1 or ,transitive ,tru?4 ,by v]acity & fai?fulness we mean ! transitive tru? ( ,god1 9 its tw(old relation to 8 creatures 9 g5]al & to 8 r$eem$ p 9 p>ticul>4 ,ps4 #ach3b--8;,i w 444 give ?anks unto ?y "n = ?y lov+k9dness & = ?y tru?3 ,= ?\ ha/ magnifi$ ?y ^w above all ?y "n02 ,john #c3cc--8;ha? set 8 seal to ?is1 t ,god is true02 ,rom4 #c3d--8let ,god be f\nd true1 b e man a li>02 ,rom4 #a3be--8! tru? ( ,god02 ,john #ad3ag--8! ,_s ( tru?02 #a ,john #e3g--8! ,_s is ! tru?02 #a ,cor4 #a3i--8;,god is fai?ful02 #a ,!ss4 #e3bd--8;fai?ful is he t calle? y02 #a ,pet4 #d3ai--8;a fai?ful ,creator02 #b ,cor4 #a3bj--8;h[ _m soev] be ! promises ( ,god1 9 him is ! yea02 ,num4 #bc3ai--8;,god is n a man t he %\ld lie02 ,tit4 #a3b--8;,god1 :o _c lie1 promis$02 ,heb4 #f3ah--8;9 :i* x is impossible = ,god to lie40 7a7 ,9 virtue ( 8 v]acity1 all 8 revelations to creatures consi/ ) 8 ess5tial be+ & ) ea* o!r4 ,9 ,god's v]acity we h ! gu>antee t our faculties 9 _! normal ex]cise d n deceive u2 t ! laws ( ?\ght are also laws ( ?+s2 t ! ext]nal _w1 & second causes 9 x1 h objective exi/5ce2 t ! same causes w always produce ! same effects2 t ! ?reats ( ! moral nature w be execut$ ^u ! unrep5tant transgressor2 t man's moral nature is made 9 ! image ( ,god's2 & t we may draw j conclusions f :at consci5ce is 9 u to :at hol9ess is 9 him4 ,we may !re=e expect t all pa/ revelations1 :e!r 9 nature or 9 8 ^w1 w n only n be contradict$ by our future k1 b w r prove to h 9 !m m ( tru? ?an we ev] dream$4 ,man's ^w may pass away1 b ,god's ^w abides =ev] 7,mat4 #e3ah--8"o jot or "o tittle %all 9 no wise pass away f ! law02 ,is4 #dj3h--8! ^w ( ,god %all /& =ev]074 ,mat4 #f3af--8;be n z ! hypocrites40 ,9 ,god ! out] expression & ! inw>d reality always correspond4 ,assyrian wills 7 writt5 on a small tablet encas$ 9 ano!r ^u :i* ! same ?+ 0 writt5 ov] aga94 ,breakage1 or falsification1 ( ! out] envelope c\ld be correct$ by ref]5ce to ! inn]4 ,s our out] life %\ld con=m to ! he>t )91 & ! he>t )9 to ! out] life4 ,on ! duty ( speak+ ! tru?1 & ! limitations ( ! duty1 see ,newman ,smy?1 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics1 #chf-djc--8;,give ! tru? always to ^? :o 9 ! bonds ( humanity h a "r to ! tru?2 conceal x1 or falsify x1 only :5 ! human "r to ! tru? has be5 =feit$1 or is held 9 abeyance1 by sickness1 weakness1 or "s crim9al int5t40 7b7 ,9 virtue ( 8 fai?fulness1 he fulfills all 8 promises to 8 p1 :e!r express$ 9 words or impli$ 9 ! con/itution he has giv5 !m4 ,9 ,god's fai?fulness we h ! sure gr\nd ( confid5ce t he w p]=m :at 8 love has l$ him to promise to ^? :o obey ! gospel4 ,s9ce 8 promises are bas$1 n ^u :at we are or h done1 b ^u :at ,*ri/ is & has done1 our defects & errors d n invalidate !m1 s long z we are truly p5it5t & believ+3 #a ,john #a3i--8;fai?ful & righte\s to =give u our s9s0 fai?ful to 8 promise1 & righte\s to ,*ri/4 ,god's fai?fulness also ensures a supply = all ! real wants ( our be+1 bo? "h & h]eaft]1 s9ce ^! wants are implicit promises ( him :o made u3 ,ps4 #hd3aa--8,no good ?+ w he )hold f !m t walk uprightly02 #ia3d--8;,8 tru? is a %ield & a buckl]02 ,mat4 #f3cc--8;all ^! ?+s %all be add$ unto y02 #a ,cor4 #b3i--8,?+s :i* eye saw n1 & e> he>d n1 ,& :i* ent]$ n into ! he>t ( man1 ,:atsoev] ?+s ,god prep>$ = !m t love him40 ,regulus goes back to ,c>?age to die r ?an break 8 promise to 8 enemies4 ,george ,william ,curtis economizes = ye>s1 & gives up all hope ( be+ himself a ri* man1 9 ord] t he may pay ! debts ( 8 deceas$ fa!r4 ,:5 ,g5]al ,grant sold all ! pres5ts made to him by ! cr[n$ heads ( ,europe1 & paid ! obligations 9 :i* 8 insolv5t son _h involv$ him1 he said3 8,bett] pov]ty & honor1 ?an weal? & disgrace40 ,_m a bus9ess man w\ld r die ?an fail to fulfil 8 promise & let 8 note g to prote/4 8,maxwelton braes are bonnie1 ,:]e e>ly falls ! dew1 ,& 'twas !re t ,annie ,laurie ,gave me h] promise true2 ,:i* ne'er =get w ,i2 ,& = bonnie ,annie ,laurie ,i'd lay me d[n & dee40 ,betray ! man %e loves8 ,n 8,till a' ! seas gang dry1 my de>1 ,& ! rocks melt wi'! sun40 ,god's tru? w n be less ?an t ( mortal man4 ,god's v]acity is ! natural correlate to our fai?4 #b4 ,m]cy & ,goodness1 or ,transitive ,love4 ,by m]cy & goodness we mean ! transitive love ( ,god 9 its two-fold relation to ! disob$i5t & to ! ob$i5t portions ( 8 creatures4 ,titus #c3d--8;8 love t[>d man02 ,rom4 #b3d--8;goodness ( ,god02 ,mat4 #e3dd1 #de--8love y\r enemies 444 t ye may be sons ( y\r ,fa!r02 ,john #c3af--8;,god s lov$ ! _w02 #b ,pet4 #a3c--8;grant$ unto u all ?+s t p]ta9 unto life & godl9ess02 ,rom4 #h3cb--8;freely give u all ?+s02 ,john #d3aj--8;,h]e9 is love1 n t we lov$ ,god1 b t he lov$ u1 & s5t 8 ,son to be ! propitiation = our s9s40 7a7 ,m]cy is t et]nal pr9ciple ( ,god's nature :i* leads him to seek ! temporal good & et]nal salvation ( ^? :o h oppos$ !mselves to 8 w1 ev5 at ! co/ ( inf9ite self-sacrifice4 ,m>t5s53 8,view$ 9 relation to s91 et]nal love is compassionate grace40 ,god's cont9u$ importation ( natural life is a =e%ad[+1 9 a l[] sph]e1 ( :at he desires to d = 8 creatures 9 ! high] sph]e--! communication ( spiritual & et]nal life ?r\gh ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,:5 he bids u love our enemies1 he only bids u foll[ 8 own example4 ,%akespe>e1 ,titus ,&ronicus1 #b3b--8,wilt ?\ draw ne> ! nature ( ! gods8 ,draw ne> !m1 !n1 9 be+ m]ciful40 ,twelf? ,night1 #c3d--8;,9 nature !re's no blemi% b ! m9d2 ,none c be call$ de=m$ b ! unk9d4 ,virtue is beauty40 7b7 ,goodness is ! et]nal pr9ciple ( ,god's nature :i* leads him to communicate ( 8 own life & bless$ness to ^? :o are l him 9 moral "*4 ,goodness1 !re=e1 is ne>ly id5tical ) ! love ( complac5cy2 m]cy1 ) ! love ( b5evol5ce4 ,notice1 h[ev]1 t transitive love is b an outw>d manife/ation ( imman5t love4 ,! et]nal & p]fect object ( ,god's love is 9 8 own nature4 ,m5 become subord9ate objects ( t love only z !y become connect$ & id5tifi$ ) its pr9cipal object1 ! image ( ,god's p]fections 9 ,*ri/4 ,only 9 ! ,son d m5 become sons ( ,god4 ,to ?is is requisite an acceptance ( ,*ri/ on ! "p ( man4 ,?us x c be said t ,god imp>ts himself to m5 j s f> z m5 are will+ to receive him4 ,& z ,god gives himself to m51 9 all 8 moral attributes1 to answ] = !m & to r5ew !m 9 "*1 !re is tru? 9 ! /atem5t ( ,nordell 7,exam9]1 ,jan4 #ag1 #ahhd7 t 8! ma9t5ance ( hol9ess is ! function ( div9e ju/ice2 ! diffusion ( hol9ess is ! function ( div9e love40 ,we may grant ?is z sub/antially true1 :ile yet we d5y t love is a m]e =m or manife/ation ( hol9ess4 ,self-imp>tation is diff]5t f self-affirmation4 ,! attribute :i* moves ,god to p\r out is n id5tical ) ! attribute :i* moves him to ma9ta94 ,! two ideas ( hol9ess & ( love are z di/9ct z ! idea ( integrity on ! "o h& & ( g5]osity on ! o!r4 ,p>k3 8,god loves ,satan1 9 a c]ta9 s5se1 & we ought to40 ,%$d3 8,?is same love ( compassion ,god feels t[>d ! non-elect2 b ! expression ( t compassion is =bidd5 = reasons :i* are suffici5t = ,god1 b are entirely unkn[n to ! creature40 ,! goodness ( ,god is ! basis ( rew>d1 "u ,god's gov]nm5t4 ,fai?fulness leads ,god to keep 8 promises2 goodness leads him to make !m4 ,edw>ds1 ,nature ( ,virtue1 9 ,works1 #b3bfc--,love ( b5evol5ce does n presuppose beauty 9 its object4 ,love ( complac5ce does presuppose beauty4 ,virtue is n love to an object = its beauty4 ,! beauty ( intellig5t be+s does n consi/ 9 love = beauty1 or virtue 9 love = virtue4 ,virtue is love = be+ 9 g5]al1 ex]cis$ 9 a g5]al good w4 ,?is is ! doctr9e ( ,edw>ds4 ,we pref] to say t virtue is love1 n = be+ 9 g5]al1 b = good be+1 & s = ,god1 ! holy ,"o4 ,! love ( compassion is p]fectly compatible ) hatr$ ( evil & ) indignation aga9/ "o :o commits x4 ,love does n necess>ily imply approval1 b x does imply desire t all creatures %\ld fulfil ! purpose ( _! exi/5ce by be+ morally con=m$ to ! holy ,"o2 see ,godet1 9 ,! ,atonem5t1 #cci4 ,rom4 #e3h--8;,god comm5de? 8 own love t[>d u1 9 t1 :ile we 7 yet s9n]s1 ,*ri/ di$ = u40 ,we ought to love our enemies1 & ,satan is our wor/ enemy4 ,we ought to w ! good ( ,satan1 or *]i% t[>d him ! love ( b5evol5ce1 ?\gh n ! love ( complac5ce4 ,?is does n involve a condon+ ( 8 s91 or an ignor+ ( 8 moral depravity1 z seems impli$ 9 ! v]ses ( ,wm4 ,c4 ,gannett3 8,! poem hangs on ! b]ry-bu% ,:5 comes ! poet's eye2 ,! /reet beg9s to masqu]ade ,:5 ,%akespe>e passes by4 ,! ,*ri/ sees :ite 9 ,judas' he>t ,& loves 8 traitor well2 ,! ,god1 to angel 8 new heav51 ,explores 8 deepe/ hell40 #c4 ,ju/ice & ,righte\sness1 or ,transitive ,hol9ess4 ,by ju/ice & righte\sness we mean ! transitive hol9ess ( ,god1 9 virtue ( :i* 8 treatm5t ( 8 creatures con=ms to ! purity ( 8 nature1--righte\sness dem&+ f all moral be+s con=mity to ! moral p]fection ( ,god1 & ju/ice visit+ non-con=mity to t p]fection ) p5al loss or suff]+4 ,g54 #ah3be--8%all n ! ,judge ( all ! e>? d "r80 ,deut4 #cb3d--8;,all 8 ways are ju/ice2 ,a ,god ( fai?fulness & )\t iniquity1 ,j & "r is he02 ,ps4 #e3e--8,?\ hate/ all work]s ( iniquity02 #g3i-ab--8! righte\s ,god trie? ! he>ts 444 save? ! upright 444 is a righte\s judge1 ,yea1 a ,god t ha? indignation e day02 #ah3bd-bf--8;,jehovah recomp5s$ me accord+ to my righte\sness4444 ,) ! m]ciful1 ?\ wilt %[ ?yself m]ciful 444 ) ! p]v]se ?\ wilt %[ ?yself fr[>d02 ,mat4 #e3dh--8,ye !re=e %all be p]fect1 z y\r heav5ly ,fa!r is p]fect02 ,rom4 #b3f--8w r5d] to e man accord+ to 8 works02 #a ,pet4 #a3af--8,ye %all be holy2 = ,i am holy40 ,^! passages %[ t ,god loves ! same p]sons :om he hates4 ,x is n true t he hates ! s91 b loves ! s9n]2 he bo? hates & loves ! s9n] himself1 hates him z he is a liv+ & wilful antagoni/ ( tru? & hol9ess1 loves him z he is a creature capable ( good & ru9$ by 8 transgression4 ,!re is no ab/ract s9 t c be hat$ ap>t f ! p]sons 9 :om t s9 is repres5t$ & embodi$4 ,?omas ,full] f\nd x difficult to />ve ! pr(an5ess b to fe$ ! p]son ( ! impud5t begg> :o appli$ to him = food4 ,mr4 ,f9ney decl>$ t he w\ld kill ! slave-cat*]1 b w\ld love him ) all 8 he>t4 ,9 our civil w> ,dr4 ,kirk said3 8,god kn[s t we love ! rebels1 b ,god also kn[s t we w kill !m if !y d n lay d[n _! arms40 ,! complex nature ( ,god n only p]mits b necessitates ?is same d\ble treatm5t ( ! s9n]1 & ! e>?ly fa!r exp]i5ces ! same conflict ( emotions :5 8 he>t ye>ns ov] ! corrupt son :om he is compell$ to bani% f ! h\sehold4 ,mob]ly1 ,atonem5t & ,p]sonality1 #g--8;,x is ! s9n] :o is puni%$1 n ! s940 7a7 ,s9ce ju/ice & righte\sness are simply transitive hol9ess--righte\sness designat+ ?is hol9ess *iefly 9 its m&atory1 ju/ice *iefly 9 its punitive1 aspect1--!y are n m]e manife/ations ( b5evol5ce1 or ( ,god's disposition to secure ! highe/ happ9ess ( 8 creatures1 nor are !y gr\nd$ 9 ! nature ( ?+s z some?+ ap>t f or above ,god4 ,crem]1 ,n4 ,t4 ,lexicon3 8! p]fect co9cid5ce exi/+ betwe5 ,god's nature1 :i* is ! /&>d = all1 & 8 acts40 ,ju/ice & righte\sness are simply hol9ess ex]cis$ t[>d creatures4 ,! same hol9ess :i* exi/s 9 ,god 9 et]nity pa/ manife/s itself z ju/ice & righte\sness1 s soon z intellig5t creatures come into be+4 ,mu* t 0 said "u ,hol9ess z an imman5t attribute ( ,god is equally applicable "h4 ,! mod]n t5d5cy to conf\nd hol9ess ) love %[s itself 9 ! m]g+ ( ju/ice & righte\sness 9 m]e b5evol5ce4 ,in/ances ( ?is t5d5cy are ! foll[+3 ,rits*l1 ,unt]ri*t1 #af--8,! righte\sness ( ,god d5otes ! mann] 9 :i* ,god c>ries out 8 lov+ w 9 ! r$emption alike ( humanity z a :ole & ( individual m52 h5ce 8 righte\sness is indi/+ui%able f 8 grace02 see also ,rits*l1 ,re*tf4 und ,v]shnung1 #b3aac2 #c3bif4 ,pr(4 ,george ,m4 ,=bes3 8,only "r makes love moral2 only love makes "r moral40 ,jones1 ,rob]t ,br[n+1 #gj--8;,is x n b5efic5ce t places dea? at ! he>t ( s98 ,c>lyle =got ?is4 ,god is n simply a great taskma/]4 ,! p[] t imposes law is n an ali5 p[]40 ,d',arcy1 ,idealism & ,!ology1 #bcg-bdj--8;,h[ c self-realization be ! realization ( o!rs8 ,:y mu/ ! true good be always ! common good8 ,:y is ! end ( ea* ! end ( all8444 ,we ne$ a concrete univ]sal :i* w unify all p]sons40 ,s also1 ,h>ris1 ,k+dom ( ,*ri/ on ,e>?1 #ci-db2 ,god ! ,creator1 #bhg1 #bij1 #cjb--8,love1 z requir$ & regulat$ by reason1 may be call$ righte\sness4 ,love is univ]sal good w or b5evol5ce1 regulat$ 9 its ex]cise by righte\sness4 ,love is ! *oice ( ,god & man z ! objects ( tru/ & s]vice4 ,?is *oice involves ! det]m9ation ( ! w to seek univ]sal well-be+1 & 9 ?is aspect x is b5evol5ce4 ,x also involves ! cons5t ( ! w to ! reason1 & ! det]m9ation to regulate all action 9 seek+ well-be+ by its tru?s1 laws1 & ideals2 & 9 ?is aspect x is righte\sness4444 ,ju/ice is ! cons5t ( ! w to ! law ( love1 9 its au?ority1 its requirem5ts1 & its sanctions4 ,god's wra? is ! necess>y reaction ( ?is law ( love 9 ! con/itution & ord] ( ! univ]se aga9/ ! wilful violator ( x1 & ,*ri/'s suff]+s atone = s9 by ass]t+ & ma9ta9+ ! au?ority1 univ]sality1 & inviolability ( ,god's law ( love 9 8 r$emption ( m5 & 8 =giv5ess ( _! s9s4444 ,righte\sness _c be ! :ole ( love1 = ?is w\ld %ut u up to ! m]ely =mal pr9ciple ( ! law )\t tell+ u :at ! law requires4 ,b5evol5ce _c be ! :ole ( love1 = ?is w\ld %ut u up to h$onism1 9 ! =m ( utilit>ianism1 exclud+ righte\sness f ! "* ( ,god & man40 ,newman ,smy? also1 9 8 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics1 #bbg-bca1 tells u t 8love1 z self-affirm+1 is righte\sness2 z self-imp>t+1 is b5evol5ce2 z self-f9d+ 9 o!rs1 is sympa?y4 ,righte\sness1 z subjective reg>d = our own moral be+1 is hol9ess2 z objective reg>d = ! p]sons ( o!rs1 is ju/ice4 ,hol9ess is involv$ 9 love z its ess5tial respect to itself2 ! heav5ly ,fa!r is ! holy ,fa!r 7,john #ag3aa74 ,love conta9s 9 its unity a tr9ity ( virtue4 ,love affirms its own wor?9ess1 imp>ts to o!rs its good1 & f9ds its life aga9 9 ! well-be+ ( o!rs4 ,! e?ical limit ( self-imp>tation is f\nd 9 self-affirmation4 ,love 9 self-be/[al _c become suicidal4 ,! b5evol5ce ( love has its moral b\nds 9 ! hol9ess ( love4 ,true love 9 ,god ma9ta9s its transc5d5ce1 & excludes pan!ism40 ,! above doctr9e1 quot$ = sub/ance f ,newman ,smy?1 seems to u unw>rantably to include 9 love :at prop]ly belongs to hol9ess4 ,x virtually d5ies t hol9ess has any indep5d5t exi/5ce z an attribute ( ,god4 ,to make hol9ess a manife/ation ( love seems to u z irrational z to say t self-affirmation is a =m ( self-imp>tation4 ,! concession t hol9ess regulates & limits love %[s t hol9ess _c itself be love1 b mu/ be an indep5d5t & sup]ior attribute4 ,"r furni%es ! rule & law = love1 b x is n true t love furni%es ! rule & law = "r4 ,!re is no su* d\ble sov]eignty z ?is !ory w\ld imply4 ,! "o attribute t is indep5d5t & supreme is hol9ess1 & love is simply ! impulse to communicate ?is hol9ess4 ,william ,a%more3 8,dr4 ,cl>ke lays great emphasis on ! "* ( #8a good ,god4'444 ,b he is m ?an a m]ely good ,god2 he is a j ,god1 & a righte\s ,god1 & a holy ,god--a ,god :o is #8angry ) ! wick$1' ev5 :ile ready to =give !m1 if !y are will+ to rep5t 9 8 way1 & n 9 _! own4 ,he is ! ,god :o br\ght 9 a flood ^u ! _w ( ! ungodly2 :o ra9$ d[n fire & brim/one f heav52 & :o is to come 9 #8flam+ fire1 tak+ v5geance on !m t "k n ,god' & obey n ! gospel ( 8 son4444 ,paul reason$ ab\t bo? ! #8goodness' & ! #8sev]ity' ( ,god40 7b7 ,transitive hol9ess1 z righte\sness1 imposes law 9 consci5ce & ,scripture1 & may be call$ legislative hol9ess4 ,z ju/ice1 x executes ! p5alties ( law1 & may be call$ di/ributive or judicial hol9ess4 ,9 righte\sness ,god reveals *iefly 8 love ( hol9ess2 9 ju/ice1 *iefly 8 hatr$ ( s94 ,! self-affirm+ purity ( ,god dem&s a l purity 9 ^? :o h be5 made 9 8 image4 ,z ,god wills & ma9ta9s 8 own moral excell5ce1 s all creatures mu/ w & ma9ta9 ! moral excell5ce ( ,god4 ,!re c be only "o c5tre 9 ! sol> sy/em1--! sun is its own c5tre & ! c5tre = all ! planets also4 ,s ,god's purity is ! object ( 8 own w1--x mu/ be ! object ( all ! wills ( all 8 creatures also4 ,bixby1 ,crisis 9 ,morals1 #bhb--8;,x is n rational or safe = ! h& to sep>ate itself f ! he>t4 ,?is is a univ]se1 & ,god is ! he>t ( ! great sy/em4 ,altruism is n ! result ( society1 b society is ! result ( altruism4 ,x beg9s 9 creatures f> bel[ man4 ,! animals :i* "k h[ to comb9e h ! greate/ *ance ( survival4 ,! unsociable animal dies out4 ,! mo/ p]fect organism is ! mo/ sociable4 ,"r is ! debt :i* ! "p owes to ! :ole40 ,?is seems to u b a p>tial expression ( ! tru?4 ,"r is m ?an a debt to o!rs1--x is a debt to "o's self1 & ! self-affirm+1 self-pres]v+1 self-respect+ elem5t con/itutes ! limit & /&>d ( all outgo+ activity4 ,! s5tim5t ( loyalty is l>gely a rev]5ce = ?is pr9ciple ( ord] & /ability 9 gov]nm5t4 ,ps4 #ade3e--8,( ! glori\s maje/y ( ?9e honor1 ,& ( ?y wondr\s works1 w ,i m$itate02 #ig3b--8;,cl\ds & d>kness are r\nd ab\t him3 ,righte\sness & ju/ice are ! f\ndation ( 8 ?rone40 ,john ,milton1 ,eikonokla/es3 8,tru? & ju/ice are all "o2 = tru? is b ju/ice 9 our k1 & ju/ice is b tru? 9 our practice4444 ,= tru? is prop]ly no m ?an contemplation1 & h] utmo/ effici5cy is b tea*+2 b ju/ice 9 h] v ess5ce is all /r5g? & activity1 & ha? a sword put into h] h& to use aga9/ all viol5ce & oppression on ! e>?4 ,%e x is :o accepts no p]son1 & exempts none f ! sev]ity ( h] /roke40 ,a4 ,j4 ,balf\r1 ,f\ndations ( ,belief1 #cbf--8;,ev5 ! poet has n d>$ to repres5t ,jupit] tortur+ ,prome!us )\t ! dim figure ( ,av5g+ ,fate wait+ sil5tly 9 ! backgr\nd4444 ,evolution work+ out a nobl] & nobl] ju/ice is pro( t ,god is j4 ,"h is #8pref]5tial action'40 ,s4 ,s4 ,times1 ,june #i1 #aijj--8,! natural man is born ) a wrong p]sonal a/ronomy4 ,man %\ld give up ! conceit ( be+ ! c5tre ( all ?+s4 ,he %\ld accept ! ,cop]nican !ory1 & cont5t himself ) a place on ! edge ( ?+s--! place he has always really _h4 ,we all laugh at ,john ,jasp] & 8 !sis t #8! sun d move4' ,! ,cop]nican !ory is leak+ d[n into human relations1 z appe>s f ! curr5t phrase3 #8,!re are o!rs'40 7c7 ,nei!r ju/ice nor righte\sness1 !re=e1 is a matt] ( arbitr>y w4 ,!y are revelations ( ! inmo/ nature ( ,god1 ! "o 9 ! =m ( moral requirem5t1 ! o!r 9 ! =m ( judicial sanction4 ,z ,god _c b dem& ( 8 creatures t !y be l him 9 moral "*1 s he _c b en=ce ! law :i* he imposes ^u !m4 ,ju/ice j z mu* b9ds ,god to puni% z x b9ds ! s9n] to be puni%$4 ,all arbitr>9ess is exclud$ "h4 ,god is :at he is--inf9ite purity4 ,he _c *ange4 ,if creatures are to atta9 ! end ( _! be+1 !y mu/ be l ,god 9 moral purity4 ,ju/ice is no?+ b ! recognition & en=cem5t ( ?is natural necessity4 ,law is only ! transcript ( ,god's nature4 ,ju/ice does n make law1--x only reveals law4 ,p5alty is only ! reaction ( ,god's hol9ess aga9/ t :i* is its opposite4 ,s9ce righte\sness & ju/ice are only legislative & retributive hol9ess1 ,god c cease to dem& purity & to puni% s9 only :5 he ceases to be holy1 t is1 only :5 he ceases to be ,god4 8,judex damnatur cum noc5s absolvitur40 ,simon1 ,reconciliation1 #ada--8,to claim ! p]=mance ( duty is z truly obligatory z x is obligatory to p]=m ! duty :i* is prescrib$40 ,e4 ,h4 ,johnson1 ,sy/ematic ,!ology1 #hd--8;,b5evol5ce int5ds :at is well = ! creature2 ju/ice insi/s on :at is fit4 ,b ! well-=-u & ! fit-=-u precisely co9cide4 ,! only ?+ t is well = u is our normal employm5t & developm5t2 b to provide = ?is is precisely :at is fitt+ & !re=e due to u4 ,9 ! div9e nature ! di/9ction betwe5 ju/ice & b5evol5ce is "o ( =m40 ,we criticize ?is utt]ance z n suffici5tly tak+ into acc\nt ! nature ( ! "r4 ,! "r is n m]ely ! fit4 ,fitness is only g5]al adaptation :i* may h 9 x no e?ical elem5t1 :]eas "r is solely & exclusively e?ical4 ,! "r !re=e regulates ! fit & con/itutes its /&>d4 ,! well-=-u is to be det]m9$ by ! "r-=-u1 b n vice v]sa4 ,george ,w4 ,nor?rup3 8,god is n b\nd to be/[ ! same end[m5ts ^u creatures1 nor to keep all 9 a /ate ( hol9ess =ev]1 nor to r$eem ! fall51 nor to secure ! greate/ happ9ess ( ! univ]se4 ,b he is b\nd to purpose & to d :at 8 absolute hol9ess requires4 ,he has no attribute1 no w1 no sov]eignty1 above ?is law ( 8 be+4 ,he _c lie1 he _c d5y himself1 he _c look ^u s9 ) complac5cy1 he _c acquit ! guilty )\t an atonem5t40 7d7 ,nei!r ju/ice nor righte\sness be/[s rew>ds4 ,?is foll[s f ! fact t ob$i5ce is due to ,god1 in/ead ( be+ optional or a gratuity4 ,no creature c claim any?+ = 8 ob$i5ce4 ,if ,god rew>ds1 he rew>ds 9 virtue ( 8 goodness & fai?fulness1 n 9 virtue ( 8 ju/ice or 8 righte\sness4 ,:at ! creature _c claim1 h[ev]1 ,*ri/ c claim1 & ! rew>ds :i* are goodness to ! creature are righte\sness to ,*ri/4 ,god rew>ds ,*ri/'s "w = u & 9 u4 ,bru*1 ,eig5s*aftslehre1 #bhj-bhb1 & ,john ,au/91 ,prov9ce ( ,jurisprud5ce1 #a3hh-ic1 #bbj-bbc1 bo? d5y1 & rightly d5y1 t ju/ice be/[s rew>ds4 ,ju/ice simply puni%es infractions ( law4 ,9 ,mat4 #be3cd--8;inh]it ! k+dom0--inh]itance implies no m]it2 #df--! wick$ are adjudg$ to et]nal puni%m5t2 ! righte\s1 n to et]nal rew>d1 b to et]nal life4 ,luke #ag3g-aj--8:5 ye %all h done all ! ?+s t are comm&$ y1 say1 ,we are unpr(itable s]vants2 we h done t :i* x 0 our duty to d40 ,rom4 #f3bc--puni%m5t is ! 8wages ( s903 b salvation is 8! gift ( ,god02 #b3f--;,god rew>ds1 n on acc\nt ( man's "w b 8accord+ to 8 works40 ,rew>d is ?us se5 to be 9 ,scripture a matt] ( grace to ! creature2 only to ! ,*ri/ :o works = u 9 atonem5t1 & 9 u 9 reg5]ation & sanctification1 is rew>d a matt] ( debt 7see also ,john #f3bg & #b ,john #h74 ,m>t9eau1 ,types1 #b3hf1 #bdd1 #bdi--8,m]it is t[>d man2 virtue t[>d ,god40 ,all m]e s]vice is unpr(itable1 because x furni%es only an equival5t to duty1 & !re is no m>g94 ,works ( sup]]ogation are impossible1 because our all is due to ,god4 ,he w\ld h u rise into ! region ( fri5d%ip1 realize t he has be5 treat+ u n z ,ma/] b z ,fa!r1 ent] into a relation ( uncalculat+ love4 ,) ?is proviso t rew>ds are matt]s ( grace1 n ( debt1 we may ass5t to ! maxim ( ,solon3 8,a republic walks ^u two feet--j puni%m5t = ! unwor?y & due rew>d = ! wor?y40 ,george ,h>ris1 ,moral ,evolution1 #aci--8,love seeks righte\sness1 & is satisfi$ ) no?+ o!r ?an t40 ,b :5 ,h>ris adopts ! words ( ! poet3 8,! v wra? f pity grew1 ,f love ( m5 ! hate ( wrong10 he seems to u virtually to d5y t ,god hates evil = any o!r reason ?an because ( its utilit>ian disadvantages1 & to imply t good has no indep5d5t exi/5ce 9 8 nature4 ,b[ne1 ,e?ics1 #aga--8,m]it is des]t ( rew>d1 or bett]1 des]t ( moral approval40 ,t5nyson3 8,= m]it lives f man to man1 ,& n f man1 ,o ,"l1 to !e40 ,baxt]3 8,des]t is writt5 ov] ! gate ( hell2 b ov] ! gate ( heav5 only1 ,! ,gift ( ,god40 7e7 ,ju/ice 9 ,god1 z ! revelation ( 8 hol9ess1 is devoid ( all passion or caprice4 ,!re is 9 ,god no selfi% ang]4 ,! p5alties he inflicts ^u transgression are n v9dictive b v9dicative4 ,!y express ! revulsion ( ,god's nature f moral evil1 ! judicial indignation ( purity aga9/ impurity1 ! self-ass]tion ( inf9ite hol9ess aga9/ its antagoni/ & w\ld-be de/roy]4 ,b because its decisions are calm1 !y are irrev]sible4 ,ang]1 )9 c]ta9 limits1 is a duty ( man4 ,ps4 #ig3aj--8ye t love ,jehovah1 hate evil02 ,eph4 #d3bh--8;,be ye angry1 & s9 n40 ,! calm indignation ( ! judge1 :o pron\nces s5t5ce ) te>s1 is ! true image ( ! holy ang] ( ,god aga9/ s94 ,web]1 ,zorn ,gottes1 #bh1 makes wra? only ! jeal\sy ( love4 ,x is m truly ! jeal\sy ( hol9ess4 ,pr(4 ,w4 ,a4 ,/ev5s1 ,com4 on #a ,!ss4 #b3aj--8;,holily & righte\sly are t]ms t describe ! same conduct 9 two aspects2 ! =m]1 z con=m$ to ,god's "* 9 itself2 ! latt]1 z con=m$ to 8 law2 bo? are positive40 ,lillie1 on #b ,!ss4 #a3f--8;,judgm5t is #8a righte\s ?+ ) ,god4' ,div9e ju/ice requires x = its own satisfaction40 ,see ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3age-agh1 #cfe-che2 ,tr5*1 ,syn4 ,n4 ,t41 #a3ahj1 #aha4 ,( ,ga/on de ,foix1 ! old *ronicl] admirably wrote3 8,he lov$ :at ought to be lov$1 & hat$ :at ought to be hat$1 & nev] _h miscreant ) him40 ,comp>e ,ps4 #aja3e1 #f--8;,him t ha? a high look & a pr\d he>t w ,i n suff]4 ,m9e eyes %all be ^u ! fai?ful ( ! l&1 t !y may dwell ) me40 ,ev5 ,horace ,bu%nell spoke ( ! 8wra?-pr9ciple0 9 ,god4 #a ,k4 #aa3i--8;,& ,jehovah 0 angry ) ,solomon0 because ( 8 polygamy4 ,jesus' ang] 0 no less noble ?an 8 love4 ,! love ( ! "r involv$ hatr$ ( ! wrong4 ,^? may hate :o hate evil = its hatefulness & = ! sake ( ,god4 ,hate s9 9 y\rself fir/1 & !n y may hate x 9 itself & 9 ! _w4 ,be angry only 9 ,*ri/ & ) ! wra? ( ,god4 ,w4 ,c4 ,wilk9son1 ,epic ( ,paul1 #bfd--8;,b we mu/ purge ourselves ( self-reg>d1 ,or we are s9ful 9 abhorr+ s940 ,in/ance ,judge ,h>ris's pity1 z he s5t5c$ ! murd]]2 see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,philosophy & ,religion1 #aib1 #aic4 ,horace's 8,ira furor brevis e/0--8,ang] is a tempor>y madness0--is true only ( selfi% & s9ful ang]4 ,h5ce ! man :o is angry is popul>ly call$ 8mad40 ,b ang]1 ?\gh apt to become s9ful1 is n necess>ily s4 ,j ang] is nei!r madness1 nor is x brief4 ,in/ance ! judicial ang] ( ! *ur* ( ,cor9? 9 inflict+ excommunication3 #b ,cor4 #g3aa--8:at indignation1 yea :at fe>1 yea :at long+1 yea :at zeal1 yea :at av5g+60 ,! only rev5ge p]missible to ! ,*ri/ian *ur* is t 9 :i* x pursues & ext]m9ates s94 ,to be incapable ( moral indignation aga9/ wrong is to lack real love = ! "r4 ,dr4 ,arnold ( ,rugby 0 nev] sure ( a boy :o only lov$ good2 till ! boy also began to hate evil1 ,dr4 ,arnold did n feel t he 0 safe4 ,h]b]t ,sp5c] said t good nature ) ,am]icans became a crime4 ,lecky1 ,democracy & ,lib]ty3 8,!re is "o ?+ worse ?an corruption1 & t is acquiesc5ce 9 corruption40 ,cole/ock1 ,*ang+ ,viewpo9t1 #aci--8,x5ophon int5ds to say a v comm5dable ?+ ( ,cyrus ! ,y\ng]1 :5 he writes ( him t no "o _h done m good to 8 fri5ds or m h>m to 8 enemies40 ,lu!r said to a monki% antagoni/3 8,i w break 9 pieces y\r he>t ( brass & pulv]ize y\r iron bra9s40 ,%$d1 ,dogmatic ,!ology1 #a3age-agh--8;,human "* is wor?less 9 proportion z abhorr5ce ( s9 is lack+ 9 x4 ,x is relat$ ( ,*>les ,,ii t #8he felt no gratitude = b5efits1 & no res5tm5t = wrongs2 he did n love anyone1 & he did n hate anyone4' ,he 0 indiff]5t t[>d "r & wrong1 & ! only feel+ he _h 0 contempt40 ,b see ! dea?-b$ sc5e ( ! 8m]ry mon>*10 z portray$ 9 ,bp4 ,burnet1 ,evelyn's ,memoirs1 or ! ,life ( ,bp4 ,k54 ,truly 8,! end ( mir? is heav9ess0 7,prov4 #ad3ac74 ,/\t1 ,manual ( ,psy*ology1 #bb--8;,*>les ,lamb tells u t 8 fri5d ,george ,dy] c\ld nev] be br\ght to say any?+ 9 condemnation ( ! mo/ atroci\s crimes1 except t ! crim9al mu/ h be5 v ecc5tric40 ,pr(essor ,seeley3 8,no he>t is pure t is n passionate40 ,d4 ,w4 ,simon1 ,r$emption ( ,man1 #bdi1 #bej1 says t ,god's res5tm5t 8is a res5tm5t ( an ess5tially altrui/ic "*40 ,if ?is means t x is p]fectly consi/5t ) love = ! s9n]1 we c accept ! /atem5t2 if x means t love is ! only s\rce ( ! res5tm5t1 we reg>d ! /atem5t z a mis9t]pretation ( ,god's ju/ice1 :i* is b ! manife/ation ( 8 hol9ess & is n a m]e expression ( 8 love4 ,see a simil> /atem5t ( ,lidgett1 ,spiritual ,pr9ciple ( ! ,atonem5t1 #bea--8;,because ,god is love1 8 love coxi/s ) 8 wra? aga9/ s9n]s1 is ! v life ( t wra?1 & is s p]si/5t t x uses wra? z its in/rum5t1 :ile at ! same "t x seeks & supplies a propitiation40 ,?is /atem5t ignores ! fact t puni%m5t is nev] 9 ,scripture reg>d$ z an expression ( ,god's love1 b always ( ,god's hol9ess4 ,:5 we say t we love ,god1 let u make sure t x is ! true ,god1 ! ,god ( hol9ess1 t we love1 = only ?is love w make u l him4 ,! moral indignation ( a :ole univ]se ( holy be+s aga9/ moral evil1 add$ to ! agoniz+ self-condemnations ( awak5$ consci5ce 9 all ! unholy1 is only a fa9t & small reflection ( ! awful revulsion ( ,god's inf9ite ju/ice f ! impurity & selfi%ness ( 8 creatures1 & ( ! int5se1 organic1 necess>y1 & et]nal reaction ( 8 moral be+ 9 self-v9dication & ! puni%m5t ( s92 see ,j]4 #dd3d--8,oh1 d n ?is abom9able ?+ t ,i hate60 ,num4 #cb3bc--8;be sure y\r s9 w f9d y out02 ,heb4 #aj3cj1 #ca--8;,= we "k him t said1 ,v5geance belonge? unto me1 ,i w recomp5se4 ,& aga91 ,! ,"l %all judge 8 p4 ,x is a fe>ful ?+ to fall into ! h&s ( ! liv+ ,god40 ,on ju/ice z an attribute ( a moral gov]nor1 see ,n4 ,w4 ,taylor1 ,moral ,gov]nm5t1 #b3bec-bic2 ,ow51 ,diss]tation on ,div9e ,ju/ice1 9 ,works1 #aj3dhc-fbd4 ,,vii4 ,rank & ,relations ( ! sev]al ,attributes4 ,! attributes h relations to ea* o!r4 ,l intellect1 affection & w 9 man1 no "o ( !m is to be conceiv$ ( z ex]cis$ sep>ately f ! re/4 ,ea* ( ! attributes is qualifi$ by all ! o!rs4 ,god's love is immutable1 wise1 holy4 ,inf9ity belongs to ,god's k1 p[]1 ju/ice4 ,yet ?is is n to say t "o attribute is ( z high rank z ano!r4 ,! moral attributes ( tru?1 love1 hol9ess1 are wor?y ( high] rev]5ce f m51 & !y are m jeal\sly gu>d$ by ,god1 ?an ! natural attributes ( omnipres5ce1 omnisci5ce1 & omnipot5ce4 ,& yet ev5 among ! moral attributes "o /&s z supreme4 ,( ?is & ( its supremacy we n[ proce$ to speak4 ,wat] is n wat] unless compos$ ( oxyg5 & hydrog54 ,oxyg5 _c be resolv$ into hydrog51 nor hydrog5 into oxyg54 ,oxyg5 has its own "*1 ?\gh only 9 comb9ation ) hydrog5 does x appe> 9 wat]4 ,w 9 man nev] acts )\t intellect & s5sibility1 yet w1 m ?an intellect or s5sibility1 is ! manife/ation ( ! man4 ,s :5 ,god acts1 he manife/s n "o attribute alone1 b 8 total moral excell5ce4 ,yet hol9ess1 z an attribute ( ,god1 has rights peculi> to itself2 x det]m9es ! attitude ( ! affections2 x m ?an any o!r faculty con/itutes ,god's moral be+4 ,cl>ke1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #hc1ib--8;,god w\ld n be holy if he 7 n love1 & c\ld n be love if he 7 n holy4 ,love is an elem5t 9 hol9ess4 ,if ?is 7 lack+1 !re w\ld be no p]fect "* z pr9ciple ( 8 own action or z /&>d = u4 ,on ! o!r h& only ! p]fect be+ c be love4 ,god mu/ be free f all ta9t ( selfi%ness 9 ord] to be love4 ,hol9ess requires ,god to act z love1 = hol9ess is ,god's self-consi/5cy4 ,love is ! desire to imp>t hol9ess4 ,hol9ess makes ,god's "* ! /&>d = 8 creatures2 b love1 desir+ to imp>t ! be/ good1 does ! same4 ,all "w ( love is "w ( hol9ess1 & all "w ( hol9ess is "w ( love4 ,conflict ( attributes is impossible1 because hol9ess always includes love1 & love always expresses hol9ess4 ,!y nev] ne$ reconciliation ) ea* o!r40 ,! g5]al correctness ( ! =ego+ /atem5t is impair$ by ! vagu5ess ( its conception ( hol9ess4 ,! ,scriptures d n reg>d hol9ess z includ+ love1 or make all ! acts ( hol9ess to be acts ( love4 ,self-affirmation does n include self-imp>tation1 & s9 necessitates an ex]cise ( hol9ess :i* is n also an ex]cise ( love4 ,b = ! ,cross1 & ,god's suff]+ = s9 ( :i* ! ,cross is ! expression1 !re w\ld be conflict betwe5 hol9ess & love4 ,! wisdom ( ,god is mo/ %[n1 n 9 reconcil+ man & ,god1 b 9 reconcil+ ! holy ,god ) ! lov+ ,god4 #a4 ,hol9ess ! fundam5tal attribute 9 ,god4 ,t hol9ess is ! fundam5tal attribute 9 ,god1 is evid5t3 7a7 ,f ,scripture1--9 :i* ,god's hol9ess is n only mo/ con/antly & p[]fully impress$ ^u ! att5tion ( man1 b is decl>$ to be ! *ief subject ( rejoic+ & adoration 9 heav54 ,x is ,god's attribute ( hol9ess t fir/ & mo/ prom95tly pres5ts itself to ! m9d ( ! s9n]1 & consci5ce only foll[s ! me?od ( ,scripture3 #a ,pet4 #a3af--8,ye %all be holy2 = ,i am holy02 ,heb4 #ab3ad--8! sanctification )\t :i* no man %all see ! "l02 cf4 ,luke #e3h--8;,dep>t f me2 = ,i am a s9ful man1 ,o ,"l40 ,yet ?is con/ant insi/5ce ^u hol9ess _c be due simply to man's pres5t /ate ( s91 = 9 heav51 :]e !re is no s91 !re is ! same reit]ation3 ,is4 #f3c--8;,holy1 holy1 holy1 is ,jehovah ( ho/s02 ,rev4 #d3h--8;,holy1 holy1 holy is ! ,"l ,god1 ! ,almighty40 ,( no o!r attribute is x said t ,god's ?rone re/s ^u x3 ,ps4 #ig3b--8,righte\sness & ju/ice are ! f\ndation ( 8 ?rone02 #ii3d1 #e1 #i--8,! k+'s /r5g? also love? ju/ice4444 ,exalt ye ,jehovah our ,god4444 holy is he40 ,we w\ld sub/itute ! ^w hol9ess = ! ^w love 9 ! /atem5t ( ,newman ,smy?1 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics1 #de--8,we assume t love is "l 9 ! div9e w1 n t ! w ( ,god is sov]eign ov] 8 love4 ,god's omnipot5ce1 z ,dorn] w\ld say1 exi/s = 8 love40 7b7 ,f our own moral con/itution1--9 :i* consci5ce ass]ts its supremacy ov] e o!r impulse & affection ( our nature4 ,z we may be k9d1 b mu/ be righte\s1 s ,god1 9 ^: image we are made1 may be m]ciful1 b mu/ be holy4 ,see ,bi%op ,butl]'s ,s]mons ^u ,human ,nature1 ,bohn's ed41 #che-dad1 %[+ 8! supremacy ( consci5ce 9 ! moral con/itution ( man40 ,we mu/ be j1 be=e we are g5]\s4 ,s ) ,god1 ju/ice mu/ be done always2 m]cy is optional ) him4 ,he 0 n "u obligation to provide a r$emption = s9n]s3 #b ,pet4 #b3d--8;,god sp>$ n angels :5 !y s9n$1 b ca/ !m d[n to hell40 ,salvation is a matt] ( grace1 n ( debt4 ,%$d1 ,disc\rses & ,essays1 #bgg-bih--8,! quality ( ju/ice is necess>y exaction2 b #8! quality ( m]cy is n 7con7/ra9$' 0 cf4 ,d5ham3 8,8 mir? is =c$ & /ra9$04 ,god c apply ! salvation1 aft] he has wr\ght x out1 to :omsoev] he w3 ,rom4 #i3ah--8;he ha? m]cy on :om he w40 ,"y1 ,night-,?\ghts1 #d3bcc--8;,a ,god all m]cy is a ,god unju/40 ,em]son3 8,y\r goodness mu/ h "s edge to x2 else x is none40 ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy1 #b3ajj--8,no "o c be j )\t subord9at+ ,pity to ! s5se ( ,"r40 ,we may le>n ( ,god's hol9ess a priori4 ,ev5 ! hea!n c\ld say 8,fiat ju/itia1 ruat clum10 or 8p]eat mundus40 ,b1 = our k ( ,god's m]cy1 we are dep5d5t ^u special revelation4 ,m]cy1 l omnipot5ce1 may exi/ 9 ,god )\t be+ ex]cis$4 ,m]cy is n grace b debt1 if ,god owes ! ex]cise ( x ei!r to ! s9n] or to himself2 v]sus ,g4 ,b4 ,/ev5s1 9 ,new ,eng41 #ahhh3dba-ddc4 8,b ju/ice is an attribute :i* n only exi/s ( necessity1 b mu/ be ex]cis$ ( necessity2 because n to ex]cise x w\ld be inju/ice02 see ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3bah1 #bai1 #chi1 #cij2 #b3djb1 & ,s]mons to ,nat4 ,man1 #cff4 ,if x be said t1 by p>ity ( reason+1 = ,god n to ex]cise m]cy is to %[ himself unm]ciful1--we reply t ?is is n true s long z high] int]e/s require t ex]cise to be )held4 ,i am n unm]ciful :5 ,i refuse to give ! poor ! money ne$$ to pay an hone/ debt2 nor is ! ,gov]nor unm]ciful :5 he refuses to p>don ! condemn$ & unrep5tant crim9al4 ,m]cy has its conditions1 z we proce$ to %[1 & x does n cease to be :5 ^! conditions d n p]mit x to be ex]cis$4 ,n s ) ju/ice3 ju/ice mu/ always be ex]cis$2 :5 x ceases to be ex]cis$1 x also ceases to be4 ,! /ory ( ! prodigal %[s a love t ev] rea*es out aft] ! son 9 ! f> c\ntry1 b :i* is ev] condition$ by ! fa!r's hol9ess & re/ra9$ f act+ until ! son has volunt>ily =sak5 8 riot\s liv+4 ,a j fa!r may bani% a corrupt son f ! h\sehold1 yet may love him s t5d]ly t 8 bani%m5t causes exquisite pa94 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,god1 ,*ri/ & ! ,holy ,_s h a consci5ce1 t is1 !y di/+ui% betwe5 "r & wrong40 ,e4 ,h4 ,johnson1 ,sy/4 ,!ology1 #he1 #hf--8;,hol9ess is prim>y z respects b5evol5ce2 = 7a7 ,hol9ess is itself moral excell5ce1 :ile ! moral excell5ce ( b5evol5ce c be expla9$4 7b7 ,hol9ess is an attribute ( be+1 :ile b5evol5ce is an attribute ( action2 b action presupposes & is controll$ by be+4 7c7 ,b5evol5ce mu/ take c\nsel ( hol9ess1 s9ce = a be+ to desire aught contr>y to hol9ess w\ld be to wi% him h>m1 :ile t :i* hol9ess leads ,god to seek1 b5evol5ce f9ds be/ = ! creature4 7d7 ,! ,mosaic disp5sation elaborately symboliz$1 & ! ,*ri/ian disp5sation makes provision to meet1 ! requirem5ts ( hol9ess z supreme2 ,james #c3ag--#8;,fir/ pure1 !n by consequ5ce peaceable4' 0 ,we are 8to d ju/ly10 z well z 8to love k9dness1 & to walk humbly )0 our ,god 7,micah #f3h74 ,dr4 ,samuel ,johnson3 8,x is surpris+ to f9d h[ mu* m k9dness ?an ju/ice society conta9s40 ,!re is a s9ful m]cy4 ,a ,s*ool ,commission] f9ds x t]rible "w to li/5 to ! pleas ( incompet5t tea*]s begg+ t !y may n be dismiss$1 & he c n]ve himself = x only by rememb]+ ! *ildr5 ^: education may be affect$ by 8 refusal to d ju/ice4 ,love & pity are n ! :ole ( ,*ri/ian duty1 nor are !y ! rul+ attributes ( ,god4 7c7 ,f ! actual deal+s ( ,god1--9 :i* hol9ess conditions & limits ! ex]cise ( o!r attributes4 ,?us1 = example1 9 ,*ri/'s r$eem+ "w1 ?\gh love makes ! atonem5t1 x is violat$ hol9ess t requires x2 & 9 ! et]nal puni%m5t ( ! wick$1 ! dem& ( hol9ess = self-v9dication ov]be>s ! plead+ ( love = ! suff]]s4 ,love _c be ! fundam5tal attribute ( ,god1 because love always requires a norm or /&>d1 & ?is norm or /&>d is f\nd only 9 hol9ess2 ,phil4 #a3i--8;,& ?is ,i pray1 t y\r love may ab\nd yet m 9 k & all disc]nm5t02 see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #chh-dje4 ,t :i* conditions all is highe/ ( all4 ,hol9ess %[s itself high] ?an love1 9 t x conditions love4 ,h5ce ,god's m]cy does n consi/ 9 outrag+ 8 own law ( hol9ess1 b 9 endur+ ! p5al affliction by :i* t law ( hol9ess is satisfi$4 ,consci5ce 9 man is b ! reflex ( hol9ess 9 ,god4 ,consci5ce dem&s ei!r retribution or atonem5t4 ,?is dem& ,*ri/ meets by 8 sub/itut$ suff]+4 ,8 sacrifice assuages ! ?ir/ ( consci5ce 9 man1 z well z ! dem& ( hol9ess 9 ,god3 ,john #f3ee--8;,= my fle% is meat inde$1 & my blood is dr9k inde$40 ,see ,%$d1 ,disc\rses & ,essays1 #bhj1 #bia1 #bib2 ,dogmatic ,!ology1 #a3cgg1 #cgh--8,! sov]eignty & fre$om ( ,god 9 respect to ju/ice relates n to ! abolition1 nor to ! relaxation1 b to ! sub/itution1 ( puni%m5t4 ,x does n consi/ 9 any p[] to violate or waive legal claims4 ,! ex]cise ( ! o!r attributes ( ,god is regulat$ & condition$ by t ( ju/ice4444 ,:]e !n is ! m]cy ( ,god1 9 case ju/ice is /rictly satisfi$ by a vic>i\s p]son8 ,!re is m]cy 9 p]mitt+ ano!r p]son to d = ! s9n] :at ! s9n] is b\nd to d = himself2 & great] m]cy 9 provid+ t p]son2 & /ill great] m]cy 9 becom+ t p]son40 ,en?usiasm1 l fire1 mu/ n only burn1 b mu/ be controll$4 ,man inv5t$ *imneys to keep 9 ! heat b to let out ! smoke4 ,we ne$ ! walls ( discretion & self-control to guide ! flam+ ( our love4 ,! hol9ess ( ,god is ! regulat+ pr9ciple ( 8 nature4 ,! ocean ( 8 m]cy is b\nd$ by ! %ores ( 8 ju/ice4 ,ev5 if hol9ess be ,god's self-love1 9 ! s5se ( ,god's self-respect or self-pres]vation1 /ill ?is self-love mu/ condition love to creatures4 ,only z ,god ma9ta9s himself 9 8 hol9ess1 c he h any?+ ( wor? to give2 love inde$ is no?+ b ! self-communication ( hol9ess4 ,& if we say1 ) ,j4 ,m4 ,:iton1 t self-affirmation 9 a univ]se 9 :i* ,god is imman5t is itself a =m ( self-imp>tation1 /ill ?is =m ( self-imp>tation mu/ condition & limit t o!r =m ( self-imp>tation :i* we call love to creatures4 ,see ,?omasius1 ,*ri/i ,p]son und ,w]k1 #a3acg-aee1 #cdf-cec2 ,patton1 art4 on ,retribution & ! ,div9e ,goodness1 9 ,pr9ceton ,rev41 ,jan4 #ahgh3h-af2 ,ow51 ,diss]tation on ! ,div9e ,ju/ice1 9 ,works1 #aj3 #dhc-fbd4 7d7 ,f ,god's et]nal purpose ( salvation1--9 :i* ju/ice & m]cy are reconcil$ only ?r\gh ! =ese5 & pr$et]m9$ sacrifice ( ,*ri/4 ,! decl>ation t ,*ri/ is 8! ,lamb 444 sla9 f ! f\ndation ( ! _w0 implies ! exi/5ce ( a pr9ciple 9 ! div9e nature :i* requires satisfaction1 be=e ,god c ent] ^u ! "w ( r$emption4 ,t pr9ciple c be none o!r ?an hol9ess4 ,s9ce bo? m]cy & ju/ice are ex]cis$ t[>d s9n]s ( ! human race1 ! o!rwise inevitable antagonism betwe5 !m is remov$ only by ! aton+ dea? ( ! ,god-man4 ,_! oppos+ claims d n impair ! div9e bless$ness1 because ! reconciliation exi/s 9 ! et]nal c\nsels ( ,god4 ,?is is intimat$ 9 ,rev4 #ac3h--8! ,lamb t ha? be5 sla9 f ! f\ndation ( ! _w40 ,?is same reconciliation is allud$ to 9 ,ps4 #he3aj--8,m]cy & tru? are met toge!r2 ,righte\sness & peace h kiss$ ea* o!r02 & 9 ,rom4 #c3bf--8t he might himself be j1 & ! ju/ifi] ( him t ha? fai? 9 ,jesus40 ,! atonem5t1 !n1 if man 0 to be sav$1 0 necess>y1 n prim>ily on man's acc\nt1 b on ,god's acc\nt4 ,%$d1 ,disc\rses & ,essays1 #bgi--,! sacrifice ( ,*ri/ 0 an 8atonem5t ab intra1 a self-oblation on ! "p ( ,deity himself1 by :i* to satisfy ^? imman5t & et]nal imp]atives ( ! div9e nature :i* )\t x mu/ f9d _! satisfaction 9 ! puni%m5t ( ! transgressor1 or else be outrag$40 ,?us ,god's ^w ( r$emption1 z well z 8 ^w ( creation1 is =ev] 8settl$ 9 heav50 7,ps4 #aai3hi74 ,its execution on ! cross 0 8accord+ to ! patt]n0 on high4 ,! ,mosaic sacrifice prefigur$ ! sacrifice ( ,*ri/2 b ! sacrifice ( ,*ri/ 0 b ! temporal disclosure ( an et]nal fact 9 ! nature ( ,god4 ,see ,kreibig1 ,v]shnung1 #aee1 #aef4 ,god requires satisfaction because he is hol9ess1 b he makes satisfaction because he is love4 ,! ,judge himself1 ) all 8 hatr$ ( transgression1 /ill loves ! transgressor1 & comes d[n f ! b5* to take ! crim9al's place & be> 8 p5alty4 ,b ?is is an et]nal provision & an et]nal sacrifice4 ,heb4 #i3ad--8! blood ( ,*ri/1 :o ?r\gh ! et]nal ,_s (f]$ himself )\t blemi% unto ,god40 ,ma!son1 ,voices ( ! ,_s1 #bae1 #baf--8;,*ri/'s sacrifice 0 (f]$ ?r\gh ! ,_s4 ,x 0 n wrung f a reluctant s\l ?r\gh ob$i5ce to outw>d law2 x came f ! inn] he>t1 f ! impulse ( undy+ love4 ,x 0 a complet$ (f]+ be=e ,calv>y began2 x 0 se5 by ! ,fa!r be=e x 0 se5 by ! _w4 ,x 0 f9i%$ 9 ! ,_s1 ere x began 9 ! fle%1 f9i%$ 9 ! h\r :5 ,*ri/ exclaim$3 #8n z ,i w1 b z ?\ wilt' 7,mat4 #bf3ci740 ,lang1 ,hom]1 #ejf--8;,apollo is ! br+] ( pe/il5ce & ! av]t] ( pe/il5ce1 9 accordance ) ! well-kn[n rule t ! two opposite attributes %\ld be comb9$ 9 ! same deity40 ,"l ,bacon1 ,confession ( ,fai?3 8,nei!r angel1 man nor _w1 c\ld /& or c /& "o mom5t 9 ,god's sight )\t behold+ ! same 9 ! face ( a ,m$iator2 & !re=e be=e him1 ) :om all ?+s are pres5t1 ! ,lamb ( ,god 0 sla9 be=e all worlds2 )\t :i* et]nal c\nsel ( 81 x 0 impossible = him to h desc5d$ to any "w ( creation40 ,orr1 ,*ri/ian ,view ( ,god & ! ,_w1 #hai--8;,creation is built on r$emption l9es0--:i* is to say t inc>nation & atonem5t 7 includ$ 9 ,god's orig9al design ( ! _w4 #b4 ,! hol9ess ( ,god ! gr\nd ( moral obligation4 ,a4 ,errone\s ,views4 ,! gr\nd ( moral obligation is n 7a7 ,9 p[]1--:e!r ( civil law 7,hobbes1 ,gass5di71 or ( div9e w 7,occam1 ,desc>tes74 ,we are n b\nd to obey ei!r ( ^!1 except ^u ! gr\nd t !y are "r4 ,?is !ory assumes t no?+ is good or "r 9 itself1 & t morality is m]e prud5ce4 ,civil law3 ,see ,hobbes1 ,levia?an1 "p i1 *ap4 #f & #ac2 "p ii1 *ap4 #cj2 ,gass5di1 ,op]a1 #f3abj4 ,^u ?is view1 might makes "r2 ! laws ( ,n]o are always b9d+2 a man may break 8 promise :5 civil law p]mits2 !re is no obligation to obey a fa!r1 a civil gov]nor1 or ,god himself1 :5 once x is c]ta9 t ! disob$i5ce w be hidd51 or :5 ! (f5d] is will+ to incur ! puni%m5t4 ,m>t9eau1 ,seat ( ,au?ority1 #fg--8,m]e magnitude ( scale c>ries no moral quality2 nor c\ld a :ole population ( devils by unanim\s ballot conf] righte\sness ^u _! w1 or make x b9d+ ^u a s+le ,abdiel40 ,rob]t ,br[n+1 ,*ri/mas ,eve1 xvii--8,ju/ice1 good1 & tru? 7 /ill ,div9e if1 by "s demon's w1 ,hatr$ & wrong _h be5 proclaim$ ,law ?r\gh ! _w1 & "r misnam$40 ,div9e w3 ,see ,occam1 lib4 #b1 qus4 #ai 7quot$ 9 ,port]1 ,moral ,sci5ce1 #abe72 ,desc>tes 7ref]r$ to 9 ,hickok1 ,moral ,sci5ce1 #bg1 #bh72 ,m>t9eau1 ,types1 #adh--8;,desc>tes held t ! w ( ,god is n ! reveal] b ! inv5tor ( moral di/9ctions4 ,god c\ld h made ,euclid a f>rago ( lies1 & ,satan a model ( moral p]fection40 ,^u ?is view1 "r & wrong are v>iable quantities4 ,duns ,scotus held t ,god's w makes n only tru? b "r4 ,god c make ly+ to be virtu\s & purity to be wrong4 ,if ,satan 7 ,god1 we %\ld be b\nd to obey him4 ,god is ess5tially indiff]5t to "r & wrong1 good & evil4 ,we reply t beh9d ! div9e w is ! div9e nature1 & t 9 ! moral p]fection ( t nature lies ! only gr\nd ( moral obligation4 ,god p\rs =? 8 love & ex]ts 8 p[] 9 accordance ) "s det]m9+ pr9ciple 9 8 own nature4 ,t pr9ciple is n happ9ess4 ,f9ney1 ,sy/4 ,!ology1 #icf1 #icg--8;,c\ld ,god's comm& make x obligatory ^u u to w evil to him8 ,if n1 !n 8 w is n ! gr\nd ( moral obligation4 ,! ?+ t is mo/ valuable1 namely1 ! highe/ good ( ,god & ( ! univ]se mu/ be bo? ! end & ! gr\nd4 ,x is ! div9e reason & n ! div9e w t p]ceives & affirms ! law ( conduct4 ,! div9e w publi%es1 b does n orig9ate1 ! rule4 ,god's w c\ld n make vice to be virtu\s40 ,z betwe5 p[] or utility on ! "o h&1 & "r on ! o!r h&1 we mu/ reg>d "r z ! m fundam5tal4 ,we d n1 h[ev]1 z w be se5 fur!r on1 place ! gr\nd ( moral obligation ev5 9 "r1 consid]$ z an ab/ract pr9ciple2 b place x r 9 ! moral excell5ce ( him :o is ! p]sonal ,"r & !re=e ! s\rce ( "r4 ,"* obliges1 & ! ma/] (t5 b[s 9 8 he>t to ! s]vant1 :5 ?is latt] is ! nobl] man4 7b7 ,nor 9 utility1--:e!r our own happ9ess or advantage pres5t or et]nal 7,paley71 = supreme reg>d = our own int]e/ is n virtu\s2 or ! greate/ happ9ess or advantage to be+ 9 g5]al 7,edw>ds71 = we judge conduct to be useful because x is "r1 n "r because x is useful4 ,?is !ory w\ld compel u to believe t 9 et]nity pa/ ,god 0 holy only because ( ! good he got f x1--t is1 !re 0 no su* ?+ z hol9ess 9 itself1 & no su* ?+ z moral "* 9 ,god4 ,our own happ9ess3 ,paley1 ,mor4 & ,pol4 ,philos41 book i1 *ap4 vii--8,virtue is ! do+ good to mank9d1 9 ob$i5ce to ! w ( ,god1 & = ! sake ( ev]la/+ happ9ess40 ,?is unites 7a7 & 7b74 ,john ,/u>t ,mill & ,dr4 ,n4 ,w4 ,taylor held t our own happ9ess is ! supreme end4 ,^! writ]s inde$ reg>d ! highe/ happ9ess z atta9$ only by liv+ = o!rs 7,mill's altruism71 b !y c assign no reason :y "o :o kn[s no o!r happ9ess ?an ! pleasures ( s5se %\ld n adopt ! maxim ( ,epicurus1 :o1 accord+ to ,lucretius1 taught t 8ducit quemque voluptas40 ,?is !ory r5d]s virtue impossible2 = a virtue :i* is m]e reg>d to our own int]e/ is n virtue b prud5ce4 8,we h a s5se ( "r & wrong indep5d5tly ( all consid]ations ( happ9ess or its loss40 ,james ,mill held t ! utility is n ! crit]ion ( ! morality b itself con/itutes ! morality4 ,g4 ,b4 ,fo/] well replies t virtue is n m]e egoi/ic sagacity1 & ! moral act is n simply a clev] bus9ess ent]prise4 ,all languages di/+ui% betwe5 virtue & prud5ce4 ,to say t ! virtues are great utilities is to conf\nd ! effect ) ! cause4 ,c>lyle says t a man c d )\t happ9ess4 ,br[n+1 ,r$ ,cotton ,nightcap ,c\ntry3 8,?ick heads ought to recognize ,! devil1 t old /ag]1 at 8 trick ,( g5]al utility1 :o leads ,d[nw>d p]haps1 b fiddles all ! way40 ,?is is ! morality ( ,"m ,goose3 8,he put 9 8 ?umb1 ,& pull$ out a plum1 ,& said1 #8,:at a good boy am ,i6' 0 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,pr9ciples & ,practice ( ,morality1 #afj--8,utility has no?+ ultimate 9 itself1 & !re=e c furni% no gr\nd ( obligation4 ,utility is m]e fitness ( "o ?+ to m9i/] to some?+ else40 ,to say t ?+s are "r because !y are useful1 is l say+ t ?+s are beautiful because !y are pleas+4 ,m>t9eau1 ,types ( ,e?ical ,!ory1 #b3agj1 #eaa1 #eef--8,! mom5t ! appetites pass into ! self-consci\s /ate1 & become ends in/ead ( impulses1 !y draw to !mselves t]ms ( c5sure4444 ,s intellectual consci5ti\sness1 or /rict submission ( ! m9d to evid5ce1 has its inspiration 9 pure love ( tru?1 & w\ld n survive an h\r if entru/$ to ! keep+ ei!r ( provid5ce or ( social affection4444 ,in/9cts1 :i* provide = !y "k n :at1 are pro( t want is ! orig9al impulse to action1 in/ead ( pleasure be+ ! end40 ,on ! happ9ess !ory1 appeals to self-int]e/ on behalf ( religion ought to be effective1--z a matt] ( fact few are mov$ by !m4 ,dewey1 ,psy*ology1 #cjj1 #cfb--8;,emotion turn$ inw>d eats up itself4 ,live on feel+s r ?an on ! ?+s to :i* feel+s belong1 & y defeat y\r own end1 exhau/ y\r p[] ( feel+1 commit emotional suicide4 ,h5ce arise cynicism1 ! nil admir>i _s1 re/less se>*+ = ! late/ s5sation4 ,! only rem$y is to get outside ( self1 to devote self to "s wor?y object1 n = feel+'s sake b = ! sake ( ! object4444 ,we d n desire an object because x gives u pleasure1 b x gives u pleasure because x satisfies ! impulse :i*1 9 connection ) ! idea ( ! object1 con/itutes ! desire4444 ,pleasure is ! accompanim5t ( ! activity or developm5t ( ! self40 ,salt]1 ,fir/ ,/eps 9 ,philosophy1 #aej--8;,x is "r to aim at happ9ess4 ,happ9ess is an end4 ,utilit>ianism errs 9 mak+ happ9ess ! only & ! highe/ end4 ,x exalts a /ate ( feel+ into ! supremely desirable ?+4 ,intuitionalism gives ! same place to a /ate ( w4 ,! tru? includes bo?4 ,! true end is ! highe/ developm5t ( be+1 self & o!rs1 ! realization ( ! div9e idea1 ,god 9 man40 ,b[ne1 ,pr9ciples ( ,e?ics1 #if--8,! /&>d ( appeal is n ! actual happ9ess ( ! actual man b ! normal happ9ess ( ! normal man4444 ,happ9ess mu/ h a law4 ,b !n also ! law mu/ lead to happ9ess4444 ,! true e?ical aim is to realize ! good4 ,b !n ! cont5ts ( ?is good h to be det]m9$ 9 accordance ) an inborn ideal ( human wor? & dignity4444 ,n all good1 b ! true good1 n ! ?+s :i* please1 b ! ?+s :i* %\ld please1 are to be ! aim ( action40 ,bixby1 ,crisis ( ,morals1 #bbc--8,! ,utilit>ian is really ask+ ab\t ! wise/ me?od ( embody+ ! ideal4 ,he belongs to t second /age 9 :i* ! moral arti/ consid]s ?r\gh :at mat]ial & 9 :at =m & color he may be/ realize 8 ?\ght4 ,:at ! ideal is1 & :y x is ! highe/1 he does n tell u4 ,morality beg9s1 n 9 feel+1 b 9 reason4 ,& reason is imp]sonal4 ,x disc]ns ! moral equality ( p]sonalities40 ,g5ung1 ,epic ( ! ,inn] ,life1 #bj--;,job speaks out 8 "* l "o ( ,rob]t ,br[n+'s h]oes4 ,he tea*es t 8!re is a s]vice ( ,god :i* is n "w = rew>d3 x is a he>t-loyalty1 a hung] aft] ,god's pres5ce1 :i* survives loss & *a/isem5t2 :i* 9 spite ( contradictory seem+ cleaves to :at is godlike z ! ne$le seeks ! pole2 & :i* rea*es up out ( ! d>kness & h>dness ( ?is life into ! light & love beyond40 ,greate/ good ( be+3 ,n only ,edw>ds1 b ,prie/ley1 ,b5?am1 ,dwight1 ,f9ney1 ,hopk9s1 ,fair*ild1 hold ?is view4 ,see ,edw>ds1 ,works1 #b3bfa-cjd--8,virtue is b5evol5ce t[>d be+ 9 g5]al02 ,dwight1 ,!ology1 #c3aej-afb--8,utility ! f\ndation ( ,virtue02 ,hopk9s1 ,law ( ,love1 #g-bh2 ,fair*ild1 ,moral ,philosophy2 ,f9ney1 ,sy/4 ,!ol41 #db-ace4 ,?is !ory reg>ds good z a m]e /ate ( ! s5sibility1 in/ead ( consi/+ 9 purity ( be+4 ,x =gets t 9 et]nity pa/ 8love = be+ 9 g5]al0 simply ,god's self-love1 or ,god's reg>d = 8 own happ9ess4 ,?is implies t ,god is holy only = a purpose2 he is b\nd to be unholy1 if great] good w\ld result2 t is1 hol9ess has no indep5d5t exi/5ce 9 8 nature4 ,we grant t a ?+ is (t5 kn[n to be "r by ! fact t x is useful2 b ?is is v diff]5t f say+ t its usefulness makes x "r4 8,utility is only ! sett+ ( ! diamond1 :i* m>ks1 b does n make1 its value40 8,if utility be a crit]ion ( rectitude1 x is only because x is a revelation ( ! div9e nature40 ,see ,briti% ,qu>t]ly1 ,july1 #ahgg1 on ,mat!w ,arnold & ,bi%op ,butl]4 ,bp4 ,butl]1 ,nature ( ,virtue1 9 ,works1 ,bohn's ed41 #ccd--8;,b5evol5ce is ! true self-love40 ,love & hol9ess are obligatory 9 !mselves1 & n because !y promote ! g5]al good4 ,cic]o well said t !y :o conf\nd$ ! hone/um ) ! utile des]v$ to be bani%$ f society4 ,see criticism on ,port]'s ,moral ,sci5ce1 9 ,lu!ran ,qu>t]ly1 ,apr4 #ahhe3cbe-cca2 also ,f4 ,l4 ,patton1 on ,metaphysics ( ,oughtness1 9 ,presb4 ,rev41 #ahhf3abg-aej4 ,encyc4 ,britannica1 #g3fij1 on ,jona?an ,edw>ds--8,be+ 9 g5]al1 be+ )\t any qualities1 is too ab/ract a ?+ to be ! prim>y cause ( love4 ,! feel+ :i* ,edw>ds ref]s to is n love1 b awe or rev]5ce1 & moreov] necess>ily a bl9d awe4 ,prop]ly /at$ !re=e1 true virtue1 accord+ to ,edw>ds1 w\ld consi/ 9 a bl9d awe ( be+ 9 g5]al1--only ?is w\ld be inconsi/5t ) 8 def9ition ( virtue z exi/+ 9 ,god4 ,9 reality1 z he makes virtue m]ely ! second object ( love1 8 !ory becomes id5tical ) t utilit>ian !ory ) :i* ! names ( ,hume1 ,b5?am & ,mill are associat$40 ,hodge1 ,essays1 #bge--8;,if obligation is due prim>ily to be+ 9 g5]al1 !n !re is no m virtue 9 lov+ ,god--will+ 8 good--?an !re is 9 lov+ ,satan4 ,b love to ,*ri/ diff]s 9 its nature f b5evol5ce t[>d ! devil40 ,pla9ly virtue consi/s1 n 9 love = m]e be+1 b 9 love = good be+1 or 9 o!r words1 9 love = ! holy ,god4 ,n ! greate/ good ( be+1 b ! hol9ess ( ,god1 is ! gr\nd ( moral obligation4 ,dr4 ,e4 ,a4 ,p>k int]prets ! ,edw>dian !ory z hold+ t virtue is love to all be+s accord+ to _! value1 love ( ! great] !re=e m ?an ! less1 8love to p>ticul> be+s 9 a proportion comp\nd$ ( ! degree ( be+ & ! degree ( virtue or b5evol5ce to be+ :i* !y h40 ,love is *oice4 ,happ9ess1 says ,p>k1 is n ! sole good1 mu* less ! happ9ess ( creatures4 ,! greate/ good is hol9ess1 ?\gh ! la/ good aim$ at is happ9ess4 ,hol9ess is dis9t]e/$ love--free *oice ( ! g5]al above ! private good4 ,b we reply t ?is gives u no reason or /&>d = virtue4 ,x does n tell u :at is good nor :y we %\ld *oose x4 ,m>t9eau1 ,types1 #b3gj1 #gg1 #dga1 #dhd--8,:y %\ld ,i promote ! g5]al well-be+8 ,:y %\ld ,i sacrifice myself = o!rs8 ,only because ?is is godlike4 ,x ,w\ld nev] h be5 prud5t to d "r1 _h x n be5 some?+ inf9itely m4444 ,x is n fitness t makes an act moral1 b x is its morality t makes x fit40 ,h]b]t ,sp5c] mu/ be class$ z a utilit>ian4 ,he says t ju/ice requires t 8e man be free to d z he wills provid$ he infr+es n ! equal fre$om ( e o!r man40 ,b1 s9ce ?is w\ld p]mit injury to ano!r by "o will+ to submit to injury 9 return1 ,mr4 ,sp5c] limits ! fre$om to 8su* actions z subs]ve life40 ,?is is practically equival5t to say+ t ! greate/ sum ( happ9ess is ! ultimate end4 ,on ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 see ,rob]t ,hall1 ,works1 #a3dc sq42 ,alex&]1 ,moral ,sci5ce1 #aid-aih2 ,bib4 ,rep]tory 7,pr9ceton ,review71 #be3bb2 ,bib4 ,sacra1 #i3agf1 #aig2 #aj3djc1 #gje4 7c7 ,nor 9 ! nature ( ?+s 7,price71--:e!r by ?is we mean _! fitness 7,cl>ke71 tru? 7,wolla/on71 ord] 7,j\ffroy71 relations 7,wayl&71 wor?9ess 7,hickok71 sympa?y 7,adam ,smi?71 or ab/ract "r 7,hav5 & ,alex&]72 = ?is nature ( ?+s is n ultimate1 b has its gr\nd 9 ! nature ( ,god4 ,we are b\nd to wor%ip ! highe/2 if any?+ exi/s beyond & above ,god1 we are b\nd to wor%ip t1--t inde$ is ,god4 ,see ,wayl&1 ,moral ,sci5ce1 #cc-dh2 ,hickok1 ,moral ,sci5ce1 #bg-cd2 ,hav51 ,moral ,philosophy1 #bg-ej2 ,alex&]1 ,moral ,sci5ce1 #aei-aih4 ,9 opposition to all ! =ms ( ?is !ory1 we urge t no?+ exi/s indep5d5tly ( or above ,god4 8,if ! gr\nd ( morals exi/ indep5d5tly ( ,god1 ei!r x has ultimately no au?ority1 or x usurps ! ?rone ( ! ,almighty4 ,any rational be+ :o kept ! law w\ld be p]fect )\t ,god1 & ! moral c5tre ( all intellig5ces w\ld be outside ( ,god0 7,talbot74 ,god is n a ,jupit] controll$ by ,fate4 ,he is subject to no law b ! law ( 8 own nature4 ,noblesse oblige1--"* rules1--purity is ! highe/4 ,& !re=e to hol9ess all creatures1 volunt>ily or involunt>ily1 are con/ra9$ to b[4 ,hopk9s1 ,law ( ,love1 #gg--8,"r & wrong h no?+ to d ) ?+s1 b only ) actions2 no?+ to d ) any nature ( ?+s exi/+ necess>ily1 b only ) ! nature ( p]sons40 ,ano!r has said3 8,! idea ( "r _c be orig9al1 s9ce "r means con=mity to "s /&>d or rule40 ,?is /&>d or rule is n an ab/raction1 b an exi/+ be+--! inf9itely p]fect ,god4 ,fab]3 8,= "r is "r1 s9ce ,god is ,god2 ,& "r ! day mu/ w92 ,to d\bt w\ld be disloyalty1 ,to falt] w\ld be s940 ,t5nyson3 8,& because "r is "r1 to foll[ "r ,7 wisdom 9 ! scorn ( consequ5ce40 ,"r is "r1 & ,i %\ld w ! "r1 n because ,god wills x1 b because ,god is x4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,pr9ciples & ,practice ( ,morality1 #agh-ahj--8,utility & relations simply reveal ! con/itution ( ?+s & s repres5t ,god4 ,moral law 0 n made = purposes ( utility1 nor d relations con/itute ! reason = obligation4 ,!y only %[ :at ! nature ( ,god is :o made ! univ]se & reveal$ himself 9 x4 ,9 8 nature is f\nd ! reason = morality40 ,s4 ,s4 ,times1 ,oct4 #ag1 #ahia--8,only t is level :i* con=ms to ! curvature ( ! e>?'s surface4 ,a /raight l9e tang5t to ! e>?'s curve w\ld at its ends be mu* fur!r f ! e>?'s c5tre ?an at its middle4 ,n[ equity means levelness4 ,! /&>d ( equity is n an imp]sonal ?+1 a 'nature ( ?+s' outside ( ,god4 ,equity or righte\sness is no m to be conceiv$ indep5d5tly ( ! div9e c5tre ( ! moral _w ?an is levelness compreh5sible ap>t f ! e>?'s c5tre40 ,s9ce ,god f9ds ! rule & limitation ( 8 action solely 9 8 own be+1 & 8 love is condition$ by 8 hol9ess1 we mu/ diff] f su* views z t ( ,moxom3 8,:e!r we def9e ,god's nature z p]fect hol9ess or p]fect love is immat]ial1 s9ce 8 nature is manife/$ only ?r\gh 8 action1 t is1 ?r\gh 8 relation to o!r be+s4 ,mo/ ( our reason+ on ! div9e /&>d ( righte\sness1 or ! ultimate gr\nd ( moral obligation1 is reason+ 9 a circle1 s9ce we mu/ always g back to ,god = ! pr9ciple ( 8 action2 :i* pr9ciple we c "k only by means ( 8 action4 ,god1 ! p]fectly righte\s ,be+1 is ! ideal /&>d ( human righte\sness4 ,righte\sness 9 man !re=e is con=mity to ! nature ( ,god4 ,god1 9 agreem5t ) 8 p]fect nature1 always wills ! p]fectly good t[>d man4 ,8 righte\sness is an expression ( 8 love2 8 love is a manife/ation ( 8 righte\sness40 ,s ,newman ,smy?3 8,righte\sness is ! et]nal g5u95ess ( ! div9e love4 ,x is n !re=e an indep5d5t excell5ce1 to be contra/$ )1 or ev5 put 9 opposition to1 b5evol5ce2 x is an ess5tial "p ( love40 ,9 reply to :i* we urge z be=e t t :i* is ! object ( love1 t :i* limits & conditions love1 t :i* furni%es ! norm & reason = love1 _c itself be love1 nor hold m]ely equal rank ) love4 ,a d\ble /&>d is z irrational 9 e?ics z 9 comm]ce1 & x leads 9 e?ics to ! same debasem5t ( ! high] values1 & ! same unsettl+ ( relations1 z has result$ 9 our curr5cy f ! attempt to make silv] regulate gold at ! same "t t gold regulates silv]4 ,b4 ,! ,scriptural ,view4--,accord+ to ! ,scriptures1 ! gr\nd ( moral obligation is ! hol9ess ( ,god1 or ! moral p]fection ( ! div9e nature1 con=mity to :i* is ! law ( our moral be+ 7,rob9son1 ,*alm]s1 ,cald]wood1 ,gregory1 ,wuttke74 ,we %[ ?is3 7a7 ,f ! comm&s3 8,ye %all be holy10 :]e ! gr\nd ( obligation assign$ is simply & only3 8= ,i am holy0 7#a ,pet4 #a3af72 & 8,ye !re=e %all be p]fect10 :]e ! /&>d laid d[n is3 8z y\r heav5ly ,fa!r is p]fect0 7,mat4 #e3dh74 ,"h we h an ultimate reason & gr\nd = be+ & do+ "r1 namely1 t ,god is "r1 or1 9 o!r words1 t hol9ess is 8 nature4 7b7 ,f ! nature ( ! love 9 :i* ! :ole law is summ$ up 7,mat4 #bb3cg--8,?\ %alt love ! ,"l ?y ,god02 ,rom4 #ac3aj--8love !re=e is ! fulfilm5t ( ! law074 ,?is love is n reg>d = ab/ract "r or = ! happ9ess ( be+1 mu* less = "o's own int]e/1 b x is reg>d = ,god z ! f\nta9 & /&>d ( moral excell5ce1 or 9 o!r words1 love = ,god z holy4 ,h5ce ?is love is ! pr9ciple & s\rce ( hol9ess 9 man4 7c7 ,f ! example ( ,*ri/1 ^: life 0 ess5tially an exhibition ( supreme reg>d = ,god1 & ( supreme devotion to 8 holy w4 ,z ,*ri/ saw no?+ good b :at 0 9 ,god 7,m>k #aj3ah--8none is good save "o1 ev5 ,god071 & did only :at he saw ! ,fa!r d 7,john #e3ai2 see also #cj--8;,i seek n m9e own w1 b ! w ( him t s5t me071 s = u1 to be l ,god is ! sum ( all duty1 & ,god's inf9ite moral excell5ce is ! supreme reason :y we %\ld be l him4 ,= /atem5ts ( ! correct view ( ! gr\nd ( moral obligation1 see ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,pr9ciples & ,practice ( ,morality1 #ach-ahj2 ,*alm]s1 ,moral ,philosophy1 #dab-dbj2 ,cald]wood1 ,moral ,philosophy2 ,gregory1 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics1 #aab-abb2 ,wuttke1 ,*ri/ian ,e?ics1 #b3hj-ajg2 ,talbot1 ,e?ical ,prolegom5a1 9 ,bap4 ,qu>41 ,july1 #ahgg3beg-bgd--8,! gr\nd ( all moral law is ! nature ( ,god1 or ! e?ical nature ( ,god 9 relation to ! l nature 9 man1 or ! imp]ativ5ess ( ! div9e nature40 ,plato3 8,! div9e w is ! f\nta9 ( all effici5cy2 ! div9e reason is ! f\nta91 ( all law2 ! div9e nature is ! f\nta9 ( all virtue40 ,if x be said t ,god is love z well z hol9ess1 we ask3 ,love to :at8 ,& ! only answ] is3 ,love to ! "r1 or to hol9ess4 ,to ask :y "r is a good1 is no m s5sible ?an to ask :y happ9ess is a good4 ,!re mu/ be some?+ ultimate4 ,s*ill] said !re are p :o want to "k :y t5 is n twelve4 ,we _c /udy "* ap>t f conduct1 nor conduct ap>t f "*4 ,b ?is does n prev5t u f recogniz+ t "* is ! fundam5tal ?+ & t conduct is only ! expression ( x4 ,! moral p]fection ( ! div9e nature includes tru? & love1 b s9ce x is hol9ess t conditions ! ex]cise ( e o!r attribute1 we mu/ conclude t hol9ess is ! gr\nd ( moral obligation4 ,inf9ity also unites ) hol9ess to make x ! p]fect gr\nd1 b s9ce ! det]m9+ elem5t is hol9ess1 we call ?is1 & n inf9ity1 ! gr\nd ( obligation4 ,j4 ,h4 ,h>ris1 ,baccalaureate ,s]mon1 ,bucknell ,univ]sity1 #ahij--8;,z hol9ess is ! fundam5tal attribute ( ,god1 s hol9ess is ! supreme good ( man4 ,ari/otle p]ceiv$ ?is :5 he decl>$ ! *ief good ( man to be en]giz+ accord+ to virtue4 ,*ri/ianity supplies ! ,holy ,_s & makes ?is en]giz+ possible40 ,hol9ess is ! goal ( man's spiritual c>e]2 see #a ,!ss4 #c3ac--8to ! end he may e/abli% y\r he>ts unblamable 9 hol9ess be=e our ,god & ,fa!r40 ,ar?ur ,h4 ,hallam1 9 ,john ,br[n's ,rab & 8 ,fri5ds1 #bgb--8;,hol9ess & happ9ess are two notions ( "o ?+4444 ,unless !re=e ! he>t ( a creat$ be+ is at "o ) ! he>t ( ,god1 x _c b be mis]able40 ,x is m true to say t hol9ess & happ9ess are1 z cause & effect1 insep>ably b\nd toge!r4 ,m>t9eau1 ,types1 #a3xvi2 #b3gj-gg--8,two classes ( facts x is indisp5sable = u to "k3 :at are ! spr+s ( volunt>y conduct1 & :at are its effects02 ,/udy1 #a3bf--8;,e?ics mu/ ei!r p]fect !mselves 9 ,religion1 or dis9tegrate !mselves into ,h$onism40 ,william ,law rem>ks3 8,e?ics are n ext]nal b int]nal4 ,! ess5ce ( a moral act does n lie 9 its result1 b 9 ! motive f :i* x spr+s4 ,& t aga9 is good or bad1 accord+ z x con=ms to ! "* ( ,god40 ,= fur!r discussion ( ! subject see our *apt] on ,! ,law ( ,god4 ,see also ,?ornwell1 ,!ology1 #a3cfc-cgc2 ,h9ton1 ,art ( ,?9k+1 #dg-fb2 ,goldw9 ,smi?1 9 ,contempor>y ,review1 ,m>*1 #ahhb1 & ,jan4 #ahhd2 ,h4 ,b4 ,smi?1 ,sy/em ( ,!ology1 #aie-bca1 esp4 #bbc4 ,*apt] ,,ii4 ,doctr9e ,( ,! ,tr9ity4 ,9 ! nature ( ! "o ,god !re are ?ree et]nal di/9ctions :i* are repres5t$ to u "u ! figure ( p]sons1 & ^! ?ree are equal4 ,?is trip]sonality ( ! ,godhead is exclusively a tru? ( revelation4 ,x is cle>ly1 ?\gh n =mally1 made kn[n 9 ! ,new ,te/am5t1 & intimations ( x may be f\nd 9 ! ,old4 ,! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity may be express$ 9 ! six foll[+ /atem5ts3 #a4 ,9 ,scripture !re are ?ree :o are recogniz$ z ,god4 #b4 ,^! ?ree are s describ$ 9 ,scripture t we are compell$ to conceive ( !m z di/9ct p]sons4 #c4 ,?is trip]sonality ( ! div9e nature is n m]ely economic & temporal1 b is imman5t & et]nal4 #d4 ,?is trip]sonality is n tri!ism2 = :ile !re are ?ree p]sons1 !re is b "o ess5ce4 #e4 ,! ?ree p]sons1 ,fa!r1 ,son & ,holy ,_s1 are equal4 #f4 ,inscrutable yet n self-contradictory1 ?is doctr9e furni%es ! key to all o!r doctr9es4--,^! /atem5ts we proce$ n[ to prove & to elucidate4 ,reason %[s u ! ,unity ( ,god2 only revelation %[s u ! ,tr9ity ( ,god1 ?us fill+ out ! indef9ite outl9es ( ?is ,unity & vivify+ x4 ,! t]m 8,tr9ity0 is n f\nd 9 ,scripture1 al?\gh ! conception x expresses is ,scriptural4 ,! inv5tion ( ! t]m is ascrib$ to ,t]tullian4 ,! ,montani/s fir/ def9$ ! p]sonality ( ! ,_s1 & fir/ =mulat$ ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity4 ,! t]m 8,tr9ity0 is n a metaphysical "o4 ,x is only a designation ( f\r facts3 7#a7 ! ,fa!r is ,god2 7#b7 ! ,son is ,god2 7#c7 ! ,_s is ,god2 7#d7 !re is b "o ,god4 ,p>k3 8,! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity does n on ! "o h& ass]t t ?ree p]sons are unit$ 9 "o p]son1 or ?ree be+s 9 "o be+1 or ?ree ,gods 9 "o ,god 7tri!ism72 nor on ! o!r h& t ,god m]ely manife/s himself 9 ?ree diff]5t ways 7modal tr9ity1 or tr9ity ( manife/ations72 b r t !re are ?ree et]nal di/9ctions 9 ! sub/ance ( ,god40 ,smy?1 preface to ,edw>ds1 ,obs]vations on ! ,tr9ity3 8,! *ur* doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity affirms t !re are 9 ! ,godhead ?ree di/9ct hypo/ases or subsi/5ces--! ,fa!r1 ! ,son & ! ,holy ,_s--ea* possess+ "o & ! same div9e nature1 ?\gh 9 a diff]5t mann]4 ,! ess5tial po9ts are 7#a7 ! unity ( ess5ce2 7#b7 ! reality ( imman5t or ontological di/9ctions40 ,see ,p>k on ,edw>ds's ,view ( ! ,tr9ity1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,april1 #ahha3ccc4 ,pr9ceton ,essays1 #a3bh--8,!re is "o ,god2 ,fa!r1 ,son1 & ,holy ,_s are ?is "o ,god2 !re is su* a di/9ction betwe5 ,fa!r1 ,son & ,holy ,_s z to lay a suffici5t gr\nd = ! reciprocal use ( ! p]sonal pron\ns40 ,joseph ,cook3 87#a7 ,! ,fa!r1 ! ,son1 & ! ,holy ,gho/ are "o ,god2 7#b7 ea* has a peculi>ity incommunicable to ! o!rs2 7#c7 nei!r is ,god )\t ! o!rs2 7#d7 ea*1 ) ! o!rs1 is ,god40 ,we reg>d ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity z implicitly held by ! apo/les & z involv$ 9 ! ,new ,te/am5t decl>ations ) reg>d to ,fa!r1 ,son & ,holy ,_s1 :ile we conc$e t ! doctr9e _h n by ! ,new ,te/am5t writ]s be5 =mulat$4 ,!y held x1 z x 7 9 solution2 only "t1 reflection1 & ! %ock ( controv]sy & opposition1 caus$ x to cry/alize into def9ite & dogmatic =m4 ,*adwick1 ,old & ,new ,unit>ianism1 #ei1 #fj1 claims t ! ,jewi% orig9 ( ,*ri/ianity %[s t ! ,jewi% ,messiah c\ld n orig9ally h be5 conceiv$ ( z div9e4 ,if ,jesus _h claim$ ?is1 he w\ld n h be5 tak5 be=e ,pilate1--! ,jews w\ld h dispat*$ him4 ,! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity1 says ,*adwick1 0 n develop$ until ! ,c\ncil ( ,nice1 #cbe4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,!re 0 no doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity 9 ! ,patri/ic p]iod1 z !re 0 no doctr9e ( ! ,atonem5t be=e ,anselm40 ,! ,outlook1 ,notes & ,qu]ies1 ,m>* #cj1 #aija--8,! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity _c be said to h tak5 f9al %ape be=e ! appe>ance ( ! s-call$ ,a?anasian ,cre$ 9 ! #h? or #i? c5tury4 ,! ,nic5e ,cre$1 =mulat$ 9 ! #d? c5tury1 is t]m$ by ,dr4 ,s*aff1 f ! or?odox po9t ( view1 #8semi-tr9it>ian4' ,! e>lie/ "t kn[n at :i* ,jesus 0 deifi$ 01 aft] ! ,new ,te/am5t writ]s1 9 ! lett]s ( ,ignatius1 at ! beg9n+ ( ! second c5tury40 ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #agi--8,! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity is n s mu* he>d1 z ov]he>d1 9 ! /atem5ts ( ,scripture40 ,george ,p4 ,fi%] quotes "s able & pi\s fri5d ( 8 z say+3 8,:at meets u 9 ! ,new ,te/am5t is ! disjecta membra ( ! ,tr9ity40 ,g4 ,b4 ,fo/]3 8,! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity is ! ,*ri/ian attempt to make intelligible ! p]sonality ( ,god )\t dep5d5ce ^u ! _w40 ,*>les ,k+sley said t1 :e!r ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity is 9 ! ,bible or no1 x ought to be !re1 because our spiritual nature cries out = x4 ,%$d1 ,dogmatic ,!ology1 #a3bej--8,?\gh ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity is n discov]able by human reason1 x is susceptible ( a rational def5se1 :5 reveal$40 ,on ,new ,engl& ,tr9it>ianism1 see ,new ,_w1 ,june1 #ahif3bgb-bie--;art4 by ,levi ,l4 ,pa9e4 ,he says t ! la/ phase ( x is repres5t$ by ,phillips ,brooks1 ,james ,m4 ,:iton & ,george ,a4 ,gordon4 ,^! hold to ! ess5tial div95ess ( humanity & prem95tly ( ,*ri/1 ! unique repres5tative ( mank9d1 :o 01 9 ?is s5se1 a true inc>nation ( ,deity4 ,see also1 ,l4 ,l4 ,pa9e1 ,evolution ( ,tr9it>ianism1 #ada1 #bhg4 ,ne&] decl>$ t ! ,tr9ity is n a fundam5tal doctr9e ( ,*ri/ianity4 ,he 0 speak+ h[ev] ( ! speculative1 metaphysical =m :i* ! doctr9e has assum$ 9 !ology4 ,b he speaks v diff]5tly ( ! devotional & practical =m 9 :i* ! ,scriptures pres5t x1 z 9 ! baptismal =mula & 9 ! apo/olic b5$iction4 ,9 reg>d to ?is he says3 8,we recognize !re9 ! ess5tial cont5ts ( ,*ri/ianity summ$ up 9 brief40 ,:iton1 ,gloria ,patri1 #aj1 #aa1 #ee1 #ia1 #ib--8;,god transc5d5t1 ! ,fa!r1 is reveal$ by ,god imman5t1 ! ,son4 ,?is "o nature belongs equally to ,god1 to ,*ri/1 & to mank9d1 & 9 ?is fact is gr\nd$ ! immutabl5ess ( moral di/9ctions & ! possibility ( moral progress4444 ,! imman5t life ( ! univ]se is "o ) ! transc5d5t ,p[]2 ! filial /ream is "o ) its pat]nal ,f\nt4 ,to ,*ri/ supremely belongs ! "n ( ,son1 :i* includes all t life t is begott5 ( ,god4 ,9 ,*ri/ ! be=e unconsci\s ,son%ip ( ! _w awakes to consci\sness ( ! ,fa!r4 ,! ,fa!r is ! ,life transc5d5t1 above all2 ! ,son is ,life imman5t1 ?r\gh all2 ! ,holy ,_s is ! ,life individualiz$1 9 all4 ,9 ,*ri/ we h collectivism2 9 ! ,holy ,_s we h individualism2 z ,buns5 says3 #8,! *ief p[] 9 ! _w is p]sonality4' 0 ,= treatm5t ( ! :ole doctr9e1 see ,dorn]1 ,sy/em ( ,doctr9e1 #a3cdd-dfe2 ,twe/51 ,dogmatik1 & translation 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #c3ejb2 ,ebr>d1 ,dogmatik1 #a3ade-aii2 ,?omasius1 ,*ri/i ,p]son und ,w]k1 #a3eg-ace2 ,kahnis1 ,dogmatik1 #c3bjc-bbi2 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3bdh-ccc1 & ,hi/ory ( ,doctr9e1 #a3bdf-che2 ,f>r>1 ,sci5ce & ,!ology1 #ach2 ,s*aff1 ,nic5e ,doctr9e ( ! ,holy ,tr9ity1 9 ,!ol4 ,eclectic1 #d3bji4 ,= ! ,unit>ian view1 see ,norton1 ,/atem5t ( ,reasons1 & ,j4 ,f4 ,cl>ke1 ,tru?s & ,errors ( ,or?odoxy4 ,i4 ,9 ,scriptures !re are ,?ree :o are recogniz$ z ,god4 #a4 ,pro(s f ! ,new ,te/am5t4 ,a4 ,! ,fa!r is recogniz$ z ,god4 ,! ,fa!r is recogniz$ z ,god1--& t 9 s great a numb] ( passages 7su* z ,john #f3bg--8;him ! ,fa!r1 ev5 ,god1 ha? seal$10 & #a ,pet4 #a3b--8;=ekn[l$ge ( ,god ! ,fa!r07 t we ne$ n delay to adduce ext5d$ pro(4 ,b4 ,jesus ,*ri/ is recogniz$ z ,god4 7a7 ,he is expressly call$ ,god4 ,9 ,john #a3a-- --! abs5ce ( ! article %[s to be ! pr$icate 7cf4 #d3bd-- 74 ,?is pr$icate prec$es ! v]b by way ( emphasis1 to indicate progress 9 ! ?\ght 8! ,logos 0 n only ) ,god1 b 0 ,god0 7see ,mey] & ,lu?>dt1 ,comm4 9 loco74 8,only c be ! subject1 = 9 ! :ole ,introduction ! "q is1 n :o ,god is1 b :o ! ,logos is0 7,godet74 ,we/cott 9 ,bible ,comm5t>y1 9 loco--8,! pr$icate /&s emphatically fir/4 ,x is necess>ily )\t ! article1 inasmu* z x describes ! nature ( ! ,^w & does n id5tify 8 p]son4 ,x w\ld be pure ,sabellianism to say3 #8,! ,^w 0 4' ,?us 9 v]se #a we h set =? ! ,^w 9 8 absolute et]nal be+1 7a7 8 exi/5ce3 beyond "t2 7b7 8 p]sonal exi/5ce3 9 active communion ) ,god2 7c7 8 nature3 ,god 9 ess5ce40 ,m>cus ,dods1 9 ,expositor's ,greek ,te/am5t1 9 loco3 8,! ,^w is di/+ui%able f ,god1 yet --! ^w 0 ,god1 ( div9e nature2 n #8a ,god1' :i* to a ,jewi% e> w\ld h be5 abom9able1 nor yet id5tical ) all t c be call$ ,god1 = !n ! article w\ld h be5 ins]t$ 7cf4 #a ,john #c3d740 ,9 ,john #a3ah1 --8! only begott5 ,god0--mu/ be reg>d$ z ! correct read+1 & z a pla9 ascription ( absolute ,deity to ,*ri/4 ,he is n simply ! only reveal] ( ,god1 b he is himself ,god reveal$4 ,john #a3ah--8,no man ha? se5 ,god at any "t2 ! only begott5 ,god1 :o is 9 ! bosom ( ! ,fa!r1 he ha? decl>$ him40 ,9 ?is passage1 al?\gh ,tis*5dorf 7#h? ed47 has 1 ,we/cott & ,hort 7) 99,,bc99,l ,pe%4 ,syr47 read & ! ,rev4 ,v]s4 puts 8! only begott5 ,god0 9 ! m>g91 ?\gh x reta9s 8! only begott5 ,son0 9 ! text4 ,h>nack says ! read+ is 8e/abli%$ beyond contradiction02 see ,we/cott1 ,bib4 ,com4 on ,john1 pages #cb1 #cc4 ,"h !n we h a new & unmi/akable ass]tion ( ! deity ( ,*ri/4 ,mey] says t ! apo/les actually call ,*ri/ ,god only 9 ,john #a3a & #bj3bh1 & t ,paul nev] s recognizes him4 ,b ,mey] is able to ma9ta9 8 position only by call+ ! doxologies to ,*ri/1 9 #b ,tim4 #d3ah1 ,heb4 #ac3ba & #b ,pet4 #c3ah1 po/-apo/olic4 ,see ,?ay]1 ,n4 ,t4 ,lexicon1 on 1 & on 4 ,9 ,john #bj3bh1 ! address ( ,?omas --8,my ,"l & my ,god0--s9ce x 0 unrebuk$ by ,*ri/1 is equival5t to an ass]tion on 8 own "p ( 8 claim to ,deity4 ,john #bj3bh--8,?omas answ]$ & said unto him1 ,my ,"l & my ,god40 ,?is address _c be int]pret$ z a sudd5 appeal to ,god 9 surprise & admiration1 )\t *>g+ ! apo/le ) pr(anity4 ,nor c x be consid]$ a m]e exhibition ( ov]wr\ght en?usiasm1 s9ce x 0 accept$ by ,*ri/4 ,contra/ ! conduct ( ,paul & ,b>nabas :5 ! hea!n at ,ly/ra 7 br++ sacrifice to !m z ,jupit] & ,m]cury 7,acts #ad3aa-ah74 ,! words ( ,?omas1 z address$ directly to ,*ri/ & z accept$ by ,*ri/1 c be reg>d$ only z a j ackn[l$gm5t on ! "p ( ,?omas t ,*ri/ 0 8 ,"l & 8 ,god4 ,al=d1 ,comm5t>y1 9 loco3 8,! ,soc9ian view t ^! words are m]ely an exclamation is refut$ 7#a7 by ! fact t no su* exclamations 7 9 use among ! ,jews2 7#b7 by ! 2 7#c7 by ! impossibility ( ref]r+ ! to ano!r ?an ,jesus3 see v]se #ac2 7#d7 by ! ,n4 ,t4 usage ( express+ ! vocative by ! nom9ative ) an article2 7#e7 by ! psy*ological absurdity ( su* a supposition3 t "o j conv9c$ ( ! pres5ce ( him :om he de>ly lov$ %\ld1 in/ead ( address+ him1 break out into an irrelevant cry2 7#f7 by ! fur!r absurdity ( suppos+ t1 if su* 7 ! case1 ! ,apo/le ,john1 :o ( all ! sacr$ writ]s mo/ con/antly keeps 9 m9d ! object = :i* he is writ+1 %\ld h record$ any?+ s beside t object2 7#g7 by ! intimate conjunction ( 40 ,cf4 ,mat4 #e3cd--8,swe> n 444 by ! heav50--swe>+ by ,jehovah is n m5tion$1 because no ,jew did s swe>4 ,?is exclamation ( ,?omas1 ! greate/ d\bt] among ! twelve1 is ! natural conclusion ( ,john's gospel4 ,! !sis 8! ,^w 0 ,god0 7,john #a3a7 has n[ become "p ( ! life & consci\sness ( ! apo/les4 ,*apt] #ba is only an ,epilogue1 or ,app5dix1 writt5 lat] by ,john1 to correct ! error t he 0 n to die2 see ,we/cott1 ,bible ,com41 9 loco4 ,! ,deity ( ,*ri/ is ! subject ( ! apo/le :o be/ und]/ood 8 ,ma/]4 ,lyman ,bee*]3 8,jesus ,*ri/ is ! act+ ,deity ( ! univ]se40 ,9 ,rom4 #i3e1 ! clause _c be translat$ 8bless$ be ! ,god ov] all10 = is sup]flu\s if ! clause is a doxology2 8 prec$es ! "n ( ,god 9 a doxology1 b foll[s x1 z "h1 9 a description0 7,hovey74 ,! clause c !re=e ju/ly be int]pret$ only z a description ( ! high] nature ( ! ,*ri/ :o _h j be5 said1 1 or accord+ to 8 l[] nature1 to h _h 8 orig9 f ,israel 7see ,?oluck1 ,com4 9 loco74 ,s&ay1 ,com4 on ,rom4 #i3e--8,! words w\ld naturally ref] to ,*ri/1 unless #8,god' is s def9itely a prop] "n t x w\ld imply a contra/ 9 itself4 ,we h se5 t ?is is n s40 ,h5ce ,s&ay translates3 8( :om is ! ,*ri/ z conc]n+ ! fle%1 :o is ov] all1 ,god bless$ =ev]04 ,see ,presid5t ,t4 ,dwight1 9 ,j\r4 ,soc4 ,bib4 ,exegesis1 #ahha3bb-ee2 p] contra1 ,ezra ,abbot1 9 ! same j\rnal1 #ahha3a-ai1 & ,d5ney1 9 ,expositor's ,gk4 ,te/41 9 loco4 ,9 ,titus #b3ac1 we reg>d 7) ,ellicott7 z 8a direct1 def9ite1 & ev5 /udi$ decl>ation ( ,*ri/'s div9ity0 8! 444 appe>+ ( ! glory ( our great ,god & ,savior ,jesus ,*ri/0 7s ,engli% ,revis$ ,v]sion74 is a t]m appli$ specially to ! ,son & nev] to ! ,fa!r1 & is uncall$ = if us$ ( ! ,fa!r1 b peculi>ly appropriate if us$ ( ,*ri/4 ,^u ! same pr9ciples we mu/ int]pret ! simil> text #b ,pet4 #a3a 7see ,hu!r1 9 ,mey]'s ,com43 8,! close juxtaposition indicates ! au?or's c]ta9ty ( ! on5ess ( ,god & ,jesus ,*ri/074 ,titus #b3ac--8look+ = ! bless$ hope & appe>+ ( ! glory ( our great ,god & ,savior1 ,jesus ,*ri/0--s ! ,engli% ,revis$ ,v]sion4 ,! ,am]ican ,revis]s h[ev] translate3 8! glory ( ! great ,god & ,savior02 & ,we/cott & ,hort bracket ! ^w 4 ,^! consid]ations some:at less5 ! cog5cy ( ?is passage z a pro(-text1 yet ^u ! :ole ! balance ( argum5t seems to u /ill to incl9e 9 favor ( ,ellicott's int]pretation z giv5 above4 ,9 ,heb4 #a3h1 2 1 1 is quot$ z an address to ,*ri/1 & v]se #aj :i* foll[s--8,?\1 ,"l1 9 ! beg9n+ ha/ laid ! f\ndation ( ! e>?0--by apply+ to ,*ri/ an ,old ,te/am5t ascription to ,jehovah1 %[s t 1 9 v]se #h1 is us$ 9 ! s5se ( absolute ,godhead4 ,x is sometimes object$ t ! ascription ( ! "n ,god to ,*ri/ proves no?+ z to 8 absolute deity1 s9ce angels & ev5 human judges are call$ gods1 z repres5t+ ,god's au?ority & execut+ 8 w4 ,b we reply t1 :ile x is true t ! "n is sometimes s appli$1 x is always ) adjuncts & 9 connections :i* leave no d\bt ( its figurative & second>y mean+4 ,:51 h[ev]1 ! "n is appli$ to ,*ri/1 x is1 on ! contr>y1 ) adjuncts & 9 connections :i* leave no d\bt t x signifies absolute ,godhead4 ,see ,ex4 #d3af--8?\ %alt be to him z ,god02 #g3a--8,see1 ,i h made !e z ,god to ,ph>aoh02 #bb3bh--8,?\ %alt n revile ,god1 m>g41 ! judges1 nor curse a rul] ( ?y p02 ,ps4 #hb3a--8;,god /&e? 9 ! congregation ( ,god2 he judge? among ! gods0 among ! mighty2 #f--8;,i said1 ,ye are gods1 ,& all ( y sons ( ! ,mo/ ,high02 #g--8,nev]!less ye %all die l m51 ,& fall l "o ( ! pr9ces40 ,cf4 ,john #aj3cd-cf--8;,if he call$ !m gods1 unto :om ! ^w ( ,god came0 7:o 7 ,god's commission$ & appo9t$ repres5tatives71 h[ mu* m prop] = him :o is "o ) ! ,fa!r to call himself ,god4 ,z 9 ,ps4 #hb3g ^? :o _h be5 call$ gods are repres5t$ z dy+1 s 9 ,ps4 #ig3g--8,wor%ip him1 all ye gods0--!y are bidd5 to fall d[n be=e ,jehovah4 ,ann4 ,p>4 ,bible3 8,al?\gh ! deities ( ! hea!n h no positive exi/5ce1 !y are (t5 describ$ 9 ,scripture z if !y _h1 & are repres5t$ z b[+ d[n be=e ! maje/y ( ,jehovah40 ,?is v]se is quot$ 9 ,heb4 #a3f--8let all ! angels ( ,god wor%ip him0--i4 e41 ,*ri/4 ,"h ,*ri/ is id5tifi$ ) ,jehovah4 ,! quotation is made f ! ,septuag9t1 :i* has 8angels0 = 8gods40 8,its use "h is 9 accordance ) ! _s ( ! ,hebrew ^w1 :i* includes all t human error might reg>d z objects ( wor%ip40 ,^? :o are figuratively & rhetorically call$ 8gods0 are bidd5 to fall d[n 9 wor%ip be=e him :o is ! true ,god1 ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,see ,dick1 ,lectures on ,!ology1 #a3cad2 ,liddon1 ,our ,"l's ,div9ity1 #aj4 ,9 #a ,john #e3bj-- 1 4 --8x w\ld be a flat repetition1 aft] ! ,fa!r _h be5 twice call$ 1 to say n[ aga93 #8?is is 4' ,our be+ 9 ,god has its basis 9 ,*ri/ 8 ,son1 & ?is also makes x m natural t %\ld be ref]r$ to 4 ,b ought n !n to be )\t ! article 7z 9 ,john #a3a-- 78 ,no1 = x is ,john's purpose 9 #a ,john #e3bj to say1 n :at ,*ri/ is1 b :o he is4 ,9 decl>+ :at "o is1 ! pr$icate mu/ h no article2 9 decl>+ :o "o is1 ! pr$icate mu/ h ! article4 ,/4 ,john "h says t ?is ,son1 on :om our be+ 9 ! true ,god re/s1 is ?is true ,god himself0 7see ,ebr>d1 ,com4 9 loco74 ,o!r passages might be "h adduc$1 z ,col4 #b3i--8;9 him dwelle? all ! fulness ( ! ,godhead bodily02 ,phil #b3f--8;exi/+ 9 ! =m ( ,god02 b we pref] to consid] ^! "u o!r heads z indirectly prov+ ,*ri/'s div9ity4 ,/ill o!r passages once reli$ ^u z direct /atem5ts ( ! doctr9e mu/ be giv5 up = textual reasons4 ,su* are ,acts #bj3bh1 :]e ! correct read+ is 9 all probability n 1 b 7s ,,acde ,tregelles & ,tis*5dorf2 ,b & 1 h[ev]1 h 4 ,! ,rev4 ,v]s4 cont9ues to read 8*ur* ( ,god02 ,am]4 ,revis]s1 h[ev]1 read 8*ur* ( ! ,"l0--see ,ezra ,abbot's inve/igation 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahgf3 #cac-ceb72 & #a ,tim4 #c3af1 :]e is unque/ionably to be sub/itut$ = 1 ?\gh ev5 "h intimates prexi/5ce4 ,rev4 ,george ,e4 ,ellis1 ,d4 ,d41 be=e ! ,unit>ian ,club1 ,bo/on1 ,novemb]1 #ahhb--8;,fifty ye>s ( /udy1 ?\ght & read+ giv5 l>gely to ! ,bible & to ! lit]ature :i* peculi>ly relates to x1 h br\ght me to ?is conclusion1 t ! book--tak5 ) ! especial div9e quality & "* claim$ = x1 & s ext5sively assign$ to x1 z inspir$ & infallible z a :ole1 & 9 all its cont5ts--is an ,or?odox book4 ,x yields :at is call$ ! ,or?odox cre$4 ,! va/ majority ( its read]s1 foll[+ its lett]1 its obvi\s s5se1 its natural mean+1 & yield+ to ! impression :i* "s ( its emphatic texts make ^u !m1 f9d 9 x ,or?odoxy4 ,only t k9d ( +5i\s1 special1 discrim9ative1 & 9 c&or ,i mu/ add1 =c$ treatm5t1 :i* x receives f u lib]als c make ! book tea* any?+ b ,or?odoxy4 ,! evangelical sects1 s call$1 are cle>ly "r 9 ma9ta9+ t _! view ( ,scripture & ( its doctr9es draws a deep & wide division ( cre$ betwe5 !m & ourselves4 ,9 t e>ne/ controv]sy by pamphlet w>f>e betwe5 ,drs4 ,*ann+ & ,w>e on ! "o side1 & ,drs4 ,worce/] & ,woods & ,pr(essor ,/u>t on ! o!r--a controv]sy :i* wr\ght up ! p ( our community sixty ye>s ago m ?an did our rec5t political campaign--,i am fully conv9c$ t ! lib]al conte/ants 7 wor/$4 ,scripture exegesis1 logic & argum5t 7 cle>ly on ! side ( ! ,or?odox conte/ants4 ,& ?is 0 s1 ma9ly because ! lib]al p>ty put !mselves on ! same plane ) ! ,or?odox 9 _! way ( reg>d+ & deal+ ) ,scripture texts 9 _! be>+ ^u ! controv]sy4 ,lib]alism _c vanqui% ,or?odoxy1 if x yields to ! latt] 9 its own way ( reg>d+ & treat+ ! :ole ,bible4 ,m>t9 ,lu!r said t ! ,papi/s burn$ ! ,bible because x 0 n on _! side4 ,n[ ,i am n ab\t to attack ! ,bible because x is n on my side2 b ,i am ab\t to object z emphatically z ,i c aga9/ a "* & quality assign$ to ! ,bible1 :i* x does n claim = itself1 :i* _c be c]tifi$ = x3 & ! orig9 & gr[? & int5sity ( ! fond & sup]/iti\s influ5ces result+ 9 t view we c trace di/9ctly to ag5cies acc\nt+ =1 b n w>rant+1 ! curr5t belief4 ,or?odoxy _c readju/ its cre$s till x readju/s its e/imate ( ! ,scriptures4 ,! only relief :i* "o :o pr(esses ! ,or?odox cre$ c f9d is ei!r by =c+ 8 +5uity into ! pro(-texts or indulg+ 8 lib]ty outside ( !m40 ,) ?is confession ( a not$ ,unit>ian x is int]e/+ to comp>e ! op9ion ( ! s-call$ ,tr9it>ian1 ,dr4 ,lyman ,abbott1 :o says t ! ,new ,te/am5t n[h]e calls ,*ri/ ,god1 b ev]y:]e calls him man1 z 9 #a ,tim4 #b3e--8;= !re is "o ,god1 "o m$iator also betwe5 ,god & m51 himself man1 ,*ri/ ,jesus40 ,on ?is passage ,pr(4 ,l4 ,l4 ,pa9e rem>ks 9 ! ,new ,_w1 ,dec4 #ahid--8,t ,paul ev] conf\nd$ ,*ri/ ) ,god himself1 or reg>d$ him z 9 any way ! ,supreme ,div9ity1 is a position invalidat$ n only by direct /atem5ts1 b also by ! :ole drift ( 8 epi/les40 7b7 ,old ,te/am5t descriptions ( ,god are appli$ to him4 ,?is application to ,*ri/ ( titles & names exclusively appropriat$ to ,god is inexplicable1 if ,*ri/ 0 n reg>d$ z be+ himself ,god4 ,! peculi> awe ) :i* ! t]m 8,jehovah0 0 set ap>t by a nation ( /r5u\s mono!i/s z ! sacr$ & incommunicable "n ( ! "o self-exi/5t & cov5ant-keep+ ,god =bids ! belief t ! ,scripture writ]s c\ld h us$ x z ! designation ( a subord9ate & creat$ be+4 ,mat4 #c3c--8,make ye ready ! way ( ! ,"l0--is a quotation f ,is4 #dj3c--8,prep>e ye 444 ! way ( ,jehovah40 ,john #ab3da--8,^! ?+s said ,isaiah1 because he saw 8 glory2 & he spake ( him0 i4 e41 ,*ri/--ref]s to ,is4 #f3a--8;,9 ! ye> t ,k+ ,uzziah di$ ,i saw ! ,"l sitt+ ^u a ?rone40 ,s 9 ,eph4 #d3g1 #h--8measure ( ! gift ( ,*ri/ 444 l$ captivity captive0--is an application to ,*ri/ ( :at is said ( ,jehovah 9 ,ps4 #fh3ah4 ,9 #a ,pet4 #c3ae1 moreov]1 we read1 ) all ! great uncials1 sev]al ( ! ,fa!rs1 & all ! be/ v]sions3 8sanctify 9 y\r he>ts ,*ri/ z ,"l02 "h ! apo/le borr[s 8 language f ,is4 #h3ac1 :]e we read3 8,jehovah ( ho/s1 him %all ye sanctify40 ,:5 we rememb] t1 ) ! ,jews1 ,god's cov5ant-title 0 s sacr$ t = ! ,ke?ib 7 8writt507 ,jehovah !re 0 always sub/itut$ ! ,k]i 7 8read0--imp]ative7 ,adonai1 9 ord] to avoid pronunciation ( ! great ,"n1 x seems ! m rem>kable t ! ,greek equival5t ( 8,jehovah0 %\ld h be5 s con/antly us$ ( ,*ri/4 ,cf4 ,rom4 #aj3i--8;confess 444 ,jesus z ,"l02 #a ,cor4 #ab3c--8no man c say1 ,jesus is ,"l1 b 9 ! ,holy ,_s40 ,we mu/ rememb] also ! indignation ( ! ,jews at ,*ri/'s ass]tion ( 8 equality & on5ess ) ! ,fa!r4 ,comp>e ,goe!'s1 8,w] d>f ihn n5n580 ) ,c>lyle's1 8! awful ,unnameable ( ?is ,univ]se40 ,! ,jews1 x has be5 said1 h always vibrat$ betwe5 mono!ism & money!ism4 ,yet ,james1 ! /ronge/ ( ,hebrews1 9 8 ,epi/le uses ! ^w ',"l' freely & alt]nately ( ,god ! ,fa!r & ( ,*ri/ ! ,son4 ,?is w\ld h be5 impossible if ,james _h n believ$ 9 ! community ( ess5ce betwe5 ! ,son & ! ,fa!r4 ,x is int]e/+ to note t #a ,maccabees does n once use ! ^w or 1 or any o!r direct designation ( ,god unless x be 7cf4 8swe> 444 by ! heav50--,mat4 #e3cd74 ,s ! book ( ,e/h] conta9s no m5tion ( ! "n ( ,god1 ?\gh ! apocryphal additions to ,e/h]1 :i* are f\nd only 9 ,greek1 conta9 ! "n ( ,god 9 ! fir/ v]se1 & m5tion x 9 all eight times4 ,see ,bissell1 ,apocrypha1 9 ,lange's ,comm5t>y2 ,liddon1 ,our ,"l's ,div9ity1 #ic2 ,max ,mll] on ,semitic ,mono!ism1 9 ,*ips f a ,g]man ,work%op1 #a3ccg4 7c7 ,he possesses ! attributes ( ,god4 ,among ^! are life1 self-exi/5ce1 immutability1 tru?1 love1 hol9ess1 et]nity1 omnipres5ce1 omnisci5ce1 omnipot5ce4 ,all ^! attributes are ascrib$ to ,*ri/ 9 connections :i* %[ t ! t]ms are us$ 9 no second>y s5se1 nor 9 any s5se pr$icable ( a creature4 ,life3 ,john #a3d--8;,9 him 0 life02 #ad3f--8;,i am 444 ! life40 ,self-exi/5ce3 ,john #e3bf--8;h life 9 himself02 ,heb4 #g3af--8p[] ( an endless life40 ,immutability3 ,heb4 #ac3h--8;,jesus ,*ri/ is ! same ye/]day & to-day1 yea & =ev]40 ,tru?3 ,john #ad3f--8;,i am 444 ! tru?02 ,rev4 #c3g--8;he t is true40 ,love3 #a ,john #c3af--8;,h]eby "k we love0 7 ! p]sonal ,love1 z ! p]sonal ,tru?7 8because he laid d[n 8 life = u40 ,hol9ess3 ,luke #a3ce--8t :i* is to be born %all be call$ holy1 ! ,son ( ,god02 ,john #f3fi--8?\ art ! ,holy ,"o ( ,god02 ,heb4 #g3bf--8;holy1 guileless1 undefil$1 sep>at$ f s9n]s40 ,et]nity3 ,john #a3a--8;,9 ! beg9n+ 0 ! ,^w40 ,godet says n 89 et]nity10 b 89 ! beg9n+ ( ! creation02 ! et]nity ( ! ,^w be+ an inf]5ce f ! --! ,^w 01 :5 ! _w 0 creat$3 cf4 ,g54 #a3a--8;,9 ! beg9n+ ,god creat$40 ,b ,mey] says1 "h rises above ! hi/orical conception ( 89 ! beg9n+0 9 ,g5esis 7:i* includes ! beg9n+ ( "t itself7 to ! absolute conception ( ant]iority to "t2 ! creation is some?+ subsequ5t4 ,he f9ds a p>allel 9 ,prov4 #h3bc-- 4 ,! int]pretation 89 ! beg9n+ ( ! gospel0 is entirely unexegetical2 s ,mey]4 ,s ,john #ag3e--8;glory :i* ,i _h ) !e be=e ! _w 002 ,eph4 #a3d--8;*ose u 9 him be=e ! f\ndation ( ! _w40 ,dorn] also says t 9 ,john #a3a is n 8! beg9n+ ( ! _w10 b designates ! po9t back ( :i* x is impossible to g1 i4 e41 et]nity2 ! _w is fir/ spok5 ( 9 v]se #c4 ,john #h3eh--8;,be=e ,abraham 0 born1 ,i am02 cf4 #a3ae2 ,col4 #a3ag--8;he is be=e all ?+s02 ,heb4 #a3aa--! heav5s 8%all p]i%2 b ?\ cont9ue/02 ,rev4 #ba3f--8;,i am ! ,alpha & ! ,omega1 ! beg9n+ & ! end40 ,omnipres5ce3 ,mat4 #bh3bj--8;,i am ) y always02 ,eph4 #a3bc--8! fulness ( him t fille? all 9 all40 ,omnisci5ce3 ,mat4 #i3d--8;,jesus kn[+ _! ?\ghts02 ,john #b3bd1 #be--8knew all m5 444 knew :at 0 9 man02 #af3cj--8kn[e/ all ?+s02 ,acts #a3bd--8,?\1 ,"l1 :o kn[e/ ! he>ts ( all m50--a pray] (f]$ be=e ! day ( ,p5teco/ & %[+ ! attitude ( ! disciples t[>d _! ,ma/]2 #a ,cor4 #d3e--8until ! ,"l come1 :o w bo? br+ to light ! hidd5 ?+s ( d>kness1 & make manife/ ! c\nsels ( ! he>ts02 ,col4 #b3c--8;9 :om are all ! treasures ( wisdom & k hidd540 ,omnipot5ce3 ,mat4 #bg3ah--8;,all au?ority ha? be5 giv5 unto me 9 heav5 & on e>?02 ,rev4 #a3h--8! ,"l ,god1 :i* is & :i* 0 & :i* is to come1 ! ,almighty40 ,beys*lag1 ,n4 ,t4 ,!ology1 #a3bdi-bfj1 holds t ,jesus' prexi/5ce is simply ! concrete =m giv5 to an ideal conception4 ,jesus traces himself back1 z ev]y?+ else holy & div9e 0 trac$ back 9 ! conceptions ( 8 "t1 to a heav5ly orig9al 9 :i* x prexi/$ be=e its e>?ly appe>ance2 e4 g43 ! tab]nacle1 9 ,heb4 #h3e2 ,j]usalem1 9 ,gal4 #d3be & ,rev4 #ba3aj2 ! k+dom ( ,god 9 ,mat4 #ac3bd2 mu* m ! ,messiah1 9 ,john #f3fb--8;asc5d+ :]e he 0 be=e02 #h3eh--8;,be=e ,abraham 0 born1 ,i am02 #ag3d1 #e--8;glory :i* ,i _h ) !e be=e ! _w 00 #ag3bd--8?\ lov$/ me be=e ! f\ndation ( ! _w40 ,?is view t ,jesus exi/$ be=e creation only ideally 9 ! div9e m9d1 means simply t ,god =eknew him & 8 com+4 ,! view is refut$ by ! multipli$ intimations ( a p]sonal1 9 di/9ction f an ideal1 prexi/5ce4 ,l[rie1 ,doctr9e ( ,/4 ,john1 #aae--8,! words #8,9 ! beg9n+' 7,john #a3a7 sugge/ t ! au?or is ab\t to write a second book ( ,g5esis1 an acc\nt ( a new creation40 ,z creation presupposes a ,creator1 ! prexi/5ce ( ! p]sonal ,^w is assign$ z ! explanation ( ! be+ ( ! univ]se4 ,! indicates absolute exi/5ce1 :i* is a l(ti] idea ?an t ( m]e prexi/5ce1 al?\gh x includes ?is4 ,:ile ,john ! ,bapti/ & ,abraham are said to h aris51 appe>$1 come into be+1 x is said t ! ,logos 01 & t ! ,logos 0 ,god4 ,?is implies cot]nity ) ! ,fa!r4 ,b1 if ! view we are combat+ 7 correct1 ,john ! ,bapti/ & ,abraham prexi/$1 equally ) ,*ri/4 ,?is is c]ta9ly n ! mean+ ( ,jesus 9 ,john #h3eh--8;,be=e ,abraham 0 born1 ,i am02 cf4 ,col4 #a3ag--8;he is be=e all ?+s0--8 emphasizes ! p]sonality1 :ile decl>es t ! prexi/5ce is absolute exi/5ce0 7,lightfoot72 ,john #a3ae--8;,he t come? aft] me is become be=e me3 = he 0 be=e me0 n t ,jesus 0 born e>li] ?an ,john ! ,bapti/1 = he 0 born six mon?s lat]1 b t he exi/$ e>li]4 ,he /&s be=e ,john 9 rank1 because he exi/$ long be=e ,john 9 "t2 #f3fb--8! ,son ( man asc5d+ :]e he 0 be=e02 #af3bh--8;,i came out f ! ,fa!r1 & am come into ! _w40 ,s ,is4 #i3f1 #g1 calls ,*ri/ 8,ev]la/+ ,fa!r0 et]nity is an attribute ( ! ,messiah4 ,t4 ,w4 ,*amb]s1 9 ,j\r4 ,soc4 ,bib4 ,exegesis1 #ahha3afi-aga--8;,*ri/ is ! ,ev]la/+ ,"o1 #8^: go+s =? h be5 f ( old1 ev5 f ! days ( et]nity' 7,micah #e3b74 #8,( ! increase ( 8 gov]nm5t 444 !re %all be no end1' j because ( 8 exi/5ce !re has be5 no beg9n+40 7d7 ,! works ( ,god are ascrib$ to him4 ,we d n "h speak ( miracles1 :i* may be wr\ght by communicat$ p[]1 b ( su* works z ! creation ( ! _w1 ! uphold+ ( all ?+s1 ! f9al rais+ ( ! dead1 & ! judg+ ( all m54 ,p[] to p]=m ^! works _c be delegat$1 = !y are *>act]i/ic ( omnipot5ce4 ,creation3 ,john #a3c--8;,all ?+s 7 made ?r\gh him02 #a ,cor4 #h3f--8"o "l1 ,jesus ,*ri/1 ?r\gh :om are all ?+s02 ,col4 #a3af--8;all ?+s h be5 creat$ ?r\gh him1 & unto him02 ,heb1 #a3aj--8,?\1 ,"l1 9 ! beg9n+ did/ lay ! f\ndation ( ! e>?1 ,& ! heav5s are ! works ( ?y h&s02 #c3c1 #d--8;he t built all ?+s is ,god0 ,*ri/1 ! build] ( ! h\se ( ,israel1 is ! ,god :o made all ?+s2 ,rev4 #c3ad--8! beg9n+ ( ! creation ( ,god0 7cf4 ,plato3 8,m9d is ! ( motion074 ,uphold+3 ,col4 #a3ag--8;9 him all ?+s consi/0 7m>g4 8hold toge!r072 ,heb4 #a3c--8uphold+ all ?+s by ! ^w ( 8 p[]40 ,rais+ ! dead & judg+ ! _w3 ,john #e3bg-bi--8;au?ority to execute judgm5t 444 all t are 9 ! tombs %all he> 8 voice1 & %all come =?02 ,mat4 #be3ca1 #cb--8sit on ! ?rone ( 8 glory2 & be=e him %all be ga!r$ all ! nations40 ,if our argum5t 7 address$ :olly to believ]s1 we might also urge ,*ri/'s "w 9 ! _w z ,reveal] ( ,god & ,r$eem] f s91 z a pro( ( 8 deity4 ,on ! works ( ,*ri/1 see ,liddon1 ,our ,"l's ,div9ity1 #aec2 p] contra1 see ,exam9ation ( ,liddon's ,bampton ,lectures1 #gb4 ,/atem5ts ( ,*ri/'s creative & ( 8 uphold+ activity are comb9$ 9 ,john #a3c1 #d-- 1 4 --8,all ?+s 7 made ?r\gh him2 & )\t him 0 n any?+ made4 ,t :i* ha? be5 made 0 life 9 him0 7m>g474 ,we/cott3 8,x w\ld be difficult to f9d a m complete cons5t ( anci5t au?orities 9 favor ( any read+ ?an t :i* supports ?is punctuation40 ,we/cott !re=e adopts x4 ,! passage %[s t ! univ]se #a4 exi/s )9 ! b\nds ( ,*ri/'s be+2 #b4 is n dead1 b liv+2 #c4 d]ives its life f him2 see ,+e1 ,*ri/ian ,my/icism1 #df4 ,creation requires ! div9e pres5ce1 z well z ! div9e ag5cy4 ,god creates ?r\gh ,*ri/4 ,all ?+s 7 made1 n --8by him10 b --8?r\gh him40 ,*ri/ian believ]s 8,beh9d creation's ?robb+ scre5 ,cat* movem5ts ( ! great ,unse540 ,van ,oo/]zee1 ,*ri/ian ,dogmatics1 iv1 lvi--8,t :i* _m a philosoph] dimly conjectur$1 namely1 t ,god did n produce ! _w 9 an absolute1 imm$iate mann]1 b 9 "s way or o!r1 m$iately1 "h pres5ts itself to u ) ! lu/re ( revelation1 & exalts s mu* ! m ! claim ( ! ,son ( ,god to our deep & rev]5tial homage40 ,w\ld t su* sci5tific m5 z ,tyndall & ,huxley might see ,*ri/ 9 nature1 &1 do+ 8 w1 might le>n ( ! doctr9e & be l$ to ! ,fa!r6 ,! humble/ ,*ri/ian :o sees ,*ri/'s h& 9 ! physical univ]se & 9 human hi/ory kn[s m ( ! secret ( ! univ]se ?an all ! m]e sci5ti/s put toge!r4 ,col #a3ag--8;,9 him all ?+s consi/10 or 8hold toge!r10 means no?+ less ?an t ,*ri/ is ! pr9ciple ( cohesion 9 ! univ]se1 mak+ x a cosmos in/ead ( a *aos4 ,tyndall said t ! attraction ( ! sun ^u ! e>? 0 z inconceivable z if a horse %\ld draw a c>t )\t traces4 ,sir ,isaac ,newton3 8,gravitation mu/ be caus$ by an ag5t act+ con/antly accord+ to c]ta9 laws40 ,lightfoot3 8,gravitation is an expression ( ! m9d ( ,*ri/40 ,evolution also is a me?od ( 8 op]ation4 ,! laws ( nature are ! habits ( ,*ri/1 & nature itself is b 8 /eady & con/ant w4 ,he b9ds toge!r man & nature 9 "o organic :ole1 s t we c speak ( a 8univ]se40 ,)\t him !re w\ld be no intellectual bond1 no uni=mity ( law1 no unity ( tru?4 ,he is ! pr9ciple ( induction1 t enables u to argue f "o ?+ to ano!r4 ,! m$ium ( int]action betwe5 ?+s is also ! m$ium ( int]communication betwe5 m9ds4 ,x is fitt+ t he :o draws & holds toge!r ! physical & intellectual1 %\ld also draw & hold toge!r ! moral univ]se1 draw+ all m5 to himself 7,john #ab3cb7 & s to ,god1 & reconcil+ all ?+s 9 heav5 & e>? 7,col4 #a3bj74 ,9 ,*ri/ 8! law appe>s1 ,drawn out 9 liv+ *>act]s10 because he is ! gr\nd & s\rce ( all law1 bo? 9 nature & 9 humanity4 ,see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #f-ab4 7e7 ,he receives honor & wor%ip due only to ,god4 ,9 addition to ! address ( ,?omas1 9 ,john #bj3bh1 :i* we h already cit$ among ! pro(s t ,jesus is expressly call$ ,god1 & 9 :i* div9e honor is paid to him1 we may ref] to ! pray] & wor%ip (f]$ by ! apo/olic & po/-apo/olic *ur*4 ,john #e3bc--8t all may honor ! ,son1 ev5 z !y honor ! ,fa!r02 #ad3ad--8;,if ye %all ask me s ,b & ,tis*4 #h? ed4 any?+ 9 my "n1 t w ,i d02 ,acts #g3ei--8,/eph51 call+ ^u ! ,"l1 & say+1 ,"l ,jesus1 receive my _s0 7cf4 ,luke #bc3df--;,jesus' words3 8,fa!r1 into ?y h&s ,i comm5d my _s072 ,rom4 #aj3i--8;confess ) ?y m\? ,jesus z ,"l02 #ac--8:osoev] %all call ^u ! "n ( ! ,"l %all be sav$0 7cf4 ,g54 #d3bf--8,!n began m5 to call ^u ! "n ( ,jehovah072 #a ,cor4 #aa3bd1 #be--8?is d 9 remembrance ( me0 wor%ip ( ,*ri/2 ,heb4 #a3f--8let all ! angels ( ,god wor%ip him02 ,phil4 #b3aj1 #aa--8;9 ! "n ( ,jesus e knee %\ld b[ 444 e tongue %\ld confess t ,jesus ,*ri/ is ,"l02 ,rev4 #e3ab-ad--8,wor?y is ! ,lamb t ha? be5 sla9 to receive ! p[]444402 #b ,pet4 #c3ah--8,"l & ,savior ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,to him be ! glory02 #b ,tim4 #d3ah & ,heb4 #ac3ba--8to :om be ! glory = ev] & ev]0--^! ascriptions ( et]nal glory to ,*ri/ imply 8 deity4 ,see also #a ,pet4 #c3ae--8,sanctify 9 y\r he>ts ,*ri/ z ,"l10 & ,eph4 #e3ba--8subject+ y\rselves "o to ano!r 9 ! fe> ( ,*ri/40 ,"h is enjo9$ an attitude ( m9d t[>ds ,*ri/ :i* w\ld be idolatr\s if ,*ri/ 7 n ,god4 ,see ,liddon1 ,our ,"l's ,div9ity1 #bff1 #cff4 ,fo/]1 ,*ri/ian ,life & ,!ology1 #aed--8;,9 ! eu*>i/ic liturgy ( ! #8,tea*+' we read3 #8,hosanna to ! ,god ( ,david'2 ,ignatius /yles him repeat$ly ,god #8begott5 & unbegott51 come 9 ! fle%'2 speak+ once ( #8! blood ( ,god'1 9 evid5t allusion to ,acts #bj3bh2 ! epi/le to ,diognetus takes up ! ,paul9e words & calls him ! #8ar*itect & _w-build] by :om ,god creat$ ! heav5s'1 & names him ,god 7*ap4 vii72 ,h]mas speaks ( him z #8! holy prexi/5t ,_s1 t creat$ e creature'1 :i* /yle ( expression is foll[$ by ,ju/91 :o calls him ,god1 z also all ! lat] great writ]s4 ,9 ! second epi/le ( ,clem5t 7#acj-afj1 ,h>nack71 we read3 #8,bre?r51 x is fitt+ t y %\ld ?9k ( ,jesus ,*ri/ z ( ,god--z ! ,judge ( ! liv+ & ! dead4' ,& ,ignatius describes him z #8begott5 & unbegott51 passible & impassible1 444 :o 0 be=e ! et]nities ) ! ,fa!r4' 0 ,^! te/imonies only give evid5ce t ! ,*ur* ,fa!rs saw 9 ,scripture div9e honor ascrib$ to ,*ri/4 ,!y 7 b ! precursors ( a ho/ ( lat] int]pret]s4 ,9 a lull ( ! awful massacre ( ,arm5ian ,*ri/ians at ,sass\an1 "o ( ! ,kurdi% savages 0 he>d to ask3 8,:o 0 t #8,"l ,jesus' t !y 7 call+ to80 ,9 _! dea? agonies1 ! ,*ri/ians1 l ,/eph5 ( old1 call$ ^u ! "n ( ! ,"l4 ,rob]t ,br[n+ quot$1 9 a lett] to a lady 9 h] la/ illness1 ! words ( ,*>les ,lamb1 :5 89 a gay fancy ) "s fri5ds z to h[ he & !y w\ld feel if ! greate/ ( ! dead 7 to appe> sudd5ly 9 fle% & blood once m--on ! fir/ sugge/ion1 #8,& if ,*ri/ ent]$ ?is room8' *ang$ 8 tone at once & /utt]$ out z 8 mann] 0 :5 mov$3 #8,y see--if ,%akesp]e ent]$1 we %\ld all rise2 if ,he appe>$1 we mu/ kneel4' 0 ,on pray] to ,jesus1 see ,liddon1 ,bampton ,lectures1 note ,f2 ,b]n>d1 9 ,ha/+s' ,bib4 ,dict41 #d3dd2 ,zahn1 ,skizz5 aus dem ,leb5 d] alt5 ,kir*e1 #i1 #bhh4 7f7 ,8 "n is associat$ ) t ( ,god ^u a foot+ ( equality4 ,we d n "h allude to #a ,john #e3g 7! ?ree heav5ly witnesses71 = ! latt] "p ( ?is v]se is unque/ionably spuri\s2 b to ! =mula ( baptism1 to ! apo/olic b5$ictions1 & to ^? passages 9 :i* et]nal life is said to be dep5d5t equally ^u ,*ri/ & ^u ,god1 or 9 :i* spiritual gifts are attribut$ to ,*ri/ equally ) ! ,fa!r4 ,! =mula ( baptism3 ,mat4 #bh3ai--8;baptis+ !m into ! "n ( ! fa!r & ( ! ,son & ( ! ,holy ,_s02 cf4 ,acts #b3ch--8;be baptis$ e "o ( y 9 ! "n ( ,jesus ,*ri/02 ,rom4 #f3c--8;baptiz$ into ,*ri/ ,jesus40 8,9 ! common baptismal =mula ! ,son & ! ,_s are cord9at$ ) ! ,fa!r1 & has religi\s significance40 ,x w\ld be bo? absurd & pr(ane to speak ( baptiz+ into ! "n ( ! ,fa!r & ( ,moses4 ,! apo/olic b5$ictions3 #a ,cor4 #a3c--8;,grace to y & peace f ,god our ,fa!r & ! ,"l ,jesus ,*ri/02 #b ,cor4 #ac3ad--8,! grace ( ! ,"l ,jesus ,*ri/1 & ! love ( ,god1 & ! communion ( ! ,holy ,_s1 be ) y all40 8,9 ! b5$ictions grace is some?+ div9e1 & ,*ri/ has p[] to imp>t x4 ,b :y d we f9d #8,god1' in/ead ( simply #8! ,fa!r1' z 9 ! baptismal =mula8 ,because x is only ! ,fa!r :o does n become man or h a hi/orical exi/5ce4 ,else:]e he is specially call$ #8,god ! ,fa!r1' to di/+ui% him f ,god ! ,son & ,god ! ,holy ,_s 7,gal4 #a3c2 ,eph4 #c3ad2 #f3bc740 ,o!r passages3 ,john #e3bc--8t all may honor ! ,son1 ev5 z !y honor ! ,fa!r02 ,john #ad3a--8;believe 9 ,god1 believe also 9 me0--d\ble imp]ative 7s ,we/cott1 ,bible ,com41 9 loco72 #ag3c--8?is is life et]nal1 t !y %\ld "k !e ! only true ,god1 & him :om ?\ did/ s5d1 ev5 ,jesus ,*ri/02 ,mat4 #aa3bg--8no "o kn[e? ! ,son1 save ! ,fa!r2 nei!r do? any "k ! ,fa!r1 save ! ,son1 & he to :omsoev] ! ,son wille? to reveal him02 #a ,cor4 #ab3d-f--8! same ,_s 444 ! same ,"l ,*ri/ 444 ! same ,god0 ! ,fa!r be/[ spiritual gifts1 e4 g41 fai?3 ,rom4 #aj3ag--8;belief come? ( he>+1 & he>+ by ! ^w ( ,*ri/02 peace3 ,col4 #c3ae--8let ! peace ( ,*ri/ rule 9 y\r he>ts40 #b ,!ss4 #b3af1 #ag--8n[ our "l ,jesus ,*ri/ himself1 & ,god our ,fa!r 444 com=t y\r he>ts0--two names ) a v]b 9 ! s+ul> intimate ! on5ess ( ! ,fa!r & ! ,son 7,lillie74 ,eph4 #e3e--8k+dom ( ,*ri/ & ,god02 ,col4 #c3a--8;,*ri/ 444 seat$ on ! "r h& ( ,god0 p>ticipation 9 ! sov]eignty ( ! univ]se1--! ,ea/]n divan held n only ! mon>* b 8 son2 ,rev4 #bj3f--8prie/s ( ,god & ( ,*ri/02 #bb3c--8! ?rone ( ,god & ( ! ,lamb02 #af--8! root & ! (fspr+ ( ,david0 bo? ! ,"l ( ,david & 8 son4 ,hackett3 8,z ! dy+ ,savior said to ! ,fa!r1 #8,into ?y h&s ,i comm5d my _s' 7,luke #bc3df71 s ! dy+ ,/eph5 said to ! ,savior1 #8receive my _s' 7,acts #g3ei740 7g7 ,equality ) ,god is expressly claim$4 ,"h we may ref] to ,jesus' te/imony to himself1 already treat$ ( among ! pro(s ( ! sup]natural "* ( ! ,scripture tea*+ 7see pages #ahi1 #aij74 ,equality ) ,god is n only claim$ = himself by ,jesus1 b x is claim$ = him by 8 apo/les4 ,john #e3ah--8;call$ ,god 8 own ,fa!r1 mak+ himself equal ) ,god02 ,phil4 #b3f--8:o1 exi/+ 9 ! =m ( ,god1 c\nt$ n ! be+ on an equality ) ,god a ?+ to be grasp$0--c\nt$ n 8 equality ) ,god a ?+ to be =cibly reta9$4 ,*ri/ made & left ^u 8 contempor>ies ! impression t he claim$ to be ,god4 ,! ,new ,te/am5t has left1 ^u ! great mass ( ^? :o h read x1 ! impression t ,jesus ,*ri/ claims to be ,god4 ,if he is n ,god1 he is a deceiv] or is self-deceiv$1 &1 9 ei!r case1 ,*ri/us1 si non ,deus1 non bonus4 ,see ,nicoll1 ,life ( ,jesus ,*ri/1 #ahg4 7h7 ,fur!r pro( ( ,*ri/'s deity may be f\nd 9 ! application to him ( ! phrases3 8,son ( ,god10 8,image ( ,god02 9 ! decl>ations ( 8 on5ess ) ,god2 9 ! attribution to him ( ! fulness ( ! ,godhead4 ,mat4 #bf3fc1 #fd--8;,i adjure !e by ! liv+ ,god1 t ?\ tell u :e!r ?\ art ! ,*ri/1 ! ,son ( ,god4 ,jesus sai? unto him1 ,?\ ha/ said0--x is = ?is te/imony t ,*ri/ dies4 ,col4 #a3ae--8! image ( ! invisible ,god02 ,heb4 #a3c--8! effulg5ce ( 8 ! ,fa!r's glory1 & ! v image ( 8 sub/ance02 ,john #aj3cj--8;,i & ! ,fa!r are "o02 #ad3i--8;he t ha? se5 me ha? se5 ! ,fa!r02 #ag3aa1 #bb--8t !y may be "o1 ev5 z we are0--1 n 2 unum1 n unus2 "o sub/ance1 n "o p]son4 8,unum is antidote to ! ,arian1 sumus to ! ,sabellian h]esy40 ,col4 #b3i--8;9 him dwelle? all ! fulness ( ! ,godhead bodily02 cf4 #a3ai--8;= x 0 ! pleasure ( ! ,fa!r t 9 him %\ld all ! fulness dwell20 or 7m>g47 8= ! :ole fulness ( ,god 0 pleas$ to dwell 9 him40 ,john #af3ae--8;all ?+s :atsoev] ! ,fa!r ha? are m9e02 #ag3aj--8;all ?+s t are m9e are ?9e1 & ?9e are m9e40 ,mey] on ,john #aj3cj--8;,i & ! ,fa!r are "o0--8,"h ! ,arian und]/&+ ( a m]e e?ical h>mony z taught 9 ! words #8are "o' is unsatisfactory1 because irrelevant to ! ex]cise ( p[]4 ,on5ess ( ess5ce1 ?\gh n conta9$ 9 ! words !mselves1 is1 by ! necessities ( ! argum5t1 presuppos$ 9 !m40 ,dalman1 ,! ,words ( ,jesus3 8,n[h]e d we f9d t ,jesus call$ himself ! ,son ( ,god 9 su* a s5se z to sugge/ a m]ely religi\s & e?ical relation to ,god--a relation :i* o!rs also possess$ & :i* !y 7 capable ( atta9+ or 7 de/9$ to acquire40 ,we may add t :ile 9 ! l[] s5se !re are _m 8sons ( ,god10 !re is b "o 8only begott5 ,son40 7i7 ,^! pro(s ( ,*ri/'s deity f ! ,new ,te/am5t are corroborat$ by ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce4 ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce recognizes ,*ri/ z an absolutely p]fect ,savior1 p]fectly reveal+ ! ,godhead & wor?y ( unlimit$ wor%ip & adoration2 t is1 x practically recognizes him z ,deity4 ,b ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce also recognizes t ?r\gh ,*ri/ x has introduction & reconciliation to ,god z "o di/9ct f ,jesus ,*ri/1 z "o :o 0 ali5at$ f ! s\l by its s91 b :o is n[ reconcil$ ?r\gh ,jesus's dea?4 ,9 o!r words1 :ile recogniz+ ,jesus z ,god1 we are also compell$ to recognize a di/9ction betwe5 ! ,fa!r & ! ,son ?r\gh :om we come to ! ,fa!r4 ,al?\gh ?is exp]i5ce _c be reg>d$ z an indep5d5t witness to ,jesus' claims1 s9ce x only te/s ! tru? already made kn[n 9 ! ,bible1 /ill ! irresi/ible impulse ( e p]son :om ,*ri/ has sav$ to lift 8 ,r$eem] to ! highe/ place1 & b[ be=e him 9 ! l[lie/ wor%ip1 is /rong evid5ce t only t int]pretation ( ,scripture c be true :i* recognizes ,*ri/'s absolute ,godhead4 ,x is ! *ur*'s consci\sness ( h] ,"l's div9ity1 inde$1 & n m]e speculation ^u ! relations ( ,fa!r1 ,son1 & ,holy ,gho/1 t has compell$ ! =mulation ( ! ,scripture doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity4 ,9 ! lett] ( ,pl9y to ,trajan1 x is said ( ! e>ly ,*ri/ians 8quod ess5t soliti c>m5 ,*ri/o quasi ,deo dic]e invicem40 ,! pray]s & hymns ( ! *ur* %[ :at ! *ur* has believ$ ,scripture to tea*4 ,dwight ,moody is said to h receiv$ 8 fir/ conviction ( ! tru? ( ! gospel f he>+ ! conclud+ words ( a pray]1 8,= ,*ri/'s sake1 ,am510 :5 awak5$ f physical slumb] 9 ,dr4 ,kirk's *ur*1 ,bo/on4 ,^! words1 :]ev] utt]$1 imply man's dep5d5ce & ,*ri/'s deity4 ,see ,new ,engl&]1 #ahgh3dcb4 ,9 ,eph4 #d3cb1 ! ,revis$ ,v]sion sub/itutes 89 ,*ri/0 = 8= ,*ri/'s sake40 ,! exact phrase 8= ,*ri/'s sake0 is n f\nd 9 ! ,n4 ,t4 9 connection ) pray]1 al?\gh ! ,o4 ,t4 phrase 8= my "n's sake0 7,ps4 #be3aa7 passes into ! ,n4 ,t4 phrase 89 ! "n ( ,jesus0 7,phil4 #b3aj72 cf4 ,ps4 #gb3ae--8m5 %all pray = him cont9ually0 ! words ( ! hymn3 8,= him %all endless pray] be made1 ,& endless bless+s cr[n 8 head40 ,all ?is is pro( t ! idea ( pray] = ,*ri/'s sake is 9 ,scripture1 ?\gh ! phrase is abs5t4 ,a c>icature scrat*$ on ! wall ( ! ,palat9e palace 9 ,rome1 & dat+ back to ! ?ird c5tury1 repres5ts a human figure ) an ass's head1 hang+ ^u a cross1 :ile a man /&s be=e x 9 ! attitude ( wor%ip4 ,"u ! effigy is ?is ill-spell$ inscription3 8,alexam5os adores 8 ,god40 ,?is appeal to ! te/imony ( ,*ri/ian consci\sness 0 fir/ made by ,s*lei]ma*]4 ,william ,e4 ,glad/one3 8,all ,i write1 & all ,i ?9k1 & all ,i hope1 is bas$ ^u ! div9ity ( our ,"l1 ! "o c5tral hope ( our poor1 wayw>d race40 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,:5 y prea* salvation by fai? 9 ,*ri/1 y prea* ! ,tr9ity40 ,w4 ,g4 ,t4 ,%$d3 8,! con/ruction ( ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity />t$1 n f ! consid]ation ( ! ?ree p]sons1 b f belief 9 ! deity ( "o ( !m40 ,on ! wor%ip ( ,*ri/ 9 ! au?oriz$ s]vices ( ! ,anglican *ur*1 see ,/anley1 ,*ur* & ,/ate1 #ccc-cce2 ,liddon1 ,div9ity ( our ,"l1 #ead4 ,9 contemplat+ passages app>5tly inconsi/5t ) ^? n[ cit$1 9 t !y impute to ,*ri/ weakness & ignorance1 limitation & subjection1 we are to rememb]1 fir/1 t our ,"l 0 truly man1 z well z truly ,god1 & t ?is ignorance & weakness may be pr$icat$ ( him z ! ,god-man 9 :om deity & humanity are unit$2 secondly1 t ! div9e nature itself 0 9 "s way limit$ & humbl$ dur+ our ,savior's e>?ly life1 & t ^! passages may describe him z he 0 9 8 e/ate ( humiliation1 r ?an 9 8 orig9al & pres5t glory2 &1 ?irdly1 t !re is an ord] ( (fice & op]ation :i* is consi/5t ) ess5tial on5ess & equality1 b :i* p]mits ! ,fa!r to be spok5 ( z fir/ & ! ,son z second4 ,^! /atem5ts w be fur!r elucidat$ 9 ! treatm5t ( ! pres5t doctr9e & 9 subsequ5t exam9ation ( ! doctr9e ( ! ,p]son ( ,*ri/4 ,!re are c]ta9 ?+s ( :i* ,*ri/ 0 ignorant3 ,m>k #ac3cb--8( t day or t h\r kn[e? no "o1 n ev5 ! angels 9 heav51 nei!r ! ,son1 b ! ,fa!r40 ,he 0 subject to physical fatigue3 ,john #d3f--8;,jesus !re=e1 be+ we>i$ ) 8 j\rney1 sat ?us by ! well40 ,!re 0 a limitation connect$ ) ,*ri/'s tak+ ( human fle%3 ,phil4 #b3g--8;empti$ himself1 tak+ ! =m ( a s]vant1 be+ made 9 ! lik5ess ( m502 ,john #ad3bh--8! ,fa!r is great] ?an ,i40 ,!re is a subjection1 z respects ord] ( (fice & op]ation1 :i* is yet consi/5t ) equality ( ess5ce & on5ess ) ,god2 #a ,cor4 #ae3bh--8!n %all ! ,son also himself be subject$ to him t did subject all ?+s unto him1 t ,god may be all 9 all40 ,?is mu/ be int]pret$ consi/5tly ) ,john #ag3e--8;glorify ?\ me ) ?9e own self ) ! glory :i* ,i _h ) !e be=e ! _w 010 & ) ,phil4 #b3f1 :]e ?is glory is describ$ z be+ 8! =m ( ,god0 & 8equality ) ,god40 ,ev5 9 8 humiliation1 ,*ri/ 0 ! ,ess5tial ,tru?1 & ignorance 9 him nev] involv$ error or false tea*+4 ,ignorance on 8 "p might make 8 tea*+ at times incomplete1--x nev] 9 ! smalle/ p>ticul> made 8 tea*+ false4 ,yet "h we mu/ di/+ui% betwe5 :at he int5d$ to tea* & :at 0 m]ely incid5tal to 8 tea*+4 ,:5 he said3 ,moses 8wrote ( me0 7,john #e3df7 & 8,david 9 ! ,_s call$ him ,"l0 7,mat4 #bb3dc71 if 8 purpose 0 to tea* ! au?or%ip ( ! ,p5tateu* & ( ! #aaj? ,psalm1 we %\ld reg>d 8 words z absolutely au?oritative4 ,b x is possible t he int5d$ only to locate ! passages ref]r$ to1 & if s1 8 words _c be us$ to exclude critical conclusions z to _! au?or%ip4 ,adamson1 ,! ,m9d 9 ,*ri/1 #acf--8;,if he spoke ( ,moses or ,david1 x 0 only to id5tify ! passage4 ,! au?ority ( ! e>li] disp5sation did n re/ ^u its record be+ due to ,moses1 nor did ! appropriat5ess ( ! ,psalm lie 9 its be+ utt]$ by ,david4 ,!re is no evid5ce t ! "q ( au?or%ip ev] came be=e him40 ,adamson r m prec>i\sly sugge/s t 8!re may h be5 a lapse ( memory 9 ,jesus' m5tion ( #8,za*>iah1 son ( ,b>a*iah' 7,mat4 #bc3ce71 s9ce ?is 0 a matt] ( no spiritual import40 ,= ass]tions ( ,jesus' k1 see ,john #b3bd1 #be--8;he knew all m5 444 he ne$$ n t any "o %\ld be> witness conc]n+ man2 = he himself knew :at 0 9 man02 #f3fd--8;,jesus knew f ! beg9n+ :o !y 7 t believ$ n1 & :o x 0 t %\ld betray him02 #ab3cc--8?is he said1 signify+ by :at mann] ( dea? he %\ld die02 #ba3ai--8,n[ ?is he spake1 signify+ by :at mann] ( dea? he ,pet] %\ld glorify ,god02 #ac3a--8kn[+ t 8 h\r 0 come t he %\ld dep>t02 ,mat4 #be3ca--8:5 ! ,son ( man %all come 9 8 glory1 & all ! angels ) him1 !n %all he sit on ! ?rone ( 8 glory0 he knew t he 0 to act z f9al judge ( ! human race4 ,o!r in/ances are m5tion$ by ,adamson1 ,! ,m9d 9 ,*ri/1 #bd-di3 #a4 ,jesus' k ( ,pet] 7,john #a3db72 #b4 8 f9d+ ,philip 7#a3dc72 #c4 8 recognition ( ,na?anael 7#a3dg-ej72 #d4 ( ! woman ( ,sam>ia 7#d3ag-ai1 #ci72 #e4 miracul\s draughts ( fi%es 7,luke #e3f-i2 ,john #ba3f72 #f4 dea? ( ,laz>us 7,john #aa3ad72 #g4 ! ass's colt 7,mat4 #ba3b72 #h4 ( ! upp] room 7,m>k #ad3ae72 #i4 ( ,pet]'s d5ial 7,mat4 #bf3cd72 #aj4 ( ! mann] ( 8 own dea? 7,john #ab3cc2 #ah3cb72 #aa4 ( ! mann] ( ,pet]'s dea? 7,john #ba3ai72 #ab4 ( ! fall ( ,j]usalem 7,mat4 #bd3b74 ,on ! o!r h& !re are ass]tions & implications ( ,jesus' ignorance3 he did n "k ! day ( ! end 7,m>k #ac3cb71 ?\gh ev5 "h he intimates 8 sup]iority to angels2 #e3cj-cd--8,:o t\*$ my g>m5ts80 ?\gh ev5 "h p[] _h gone =? f him to heal2 ,john #aa3cd--8,:]e h ye laid him80 ?\gh "h he is ab\t to raise ,laz>us f ! dead2 ,m>k #aa3ac--8see+ a fig tree af> (f hav+ leaves1 he came1 if haply he might f9d any?+ !reon0 he did n "k t x _h no fruit1 yet he _h p[] to curse x4 ,) ^! evid5ces ( ! limitations ( ,jesus' k1 we mu/ ass5t to ! judgm5t ( ,bacon1 ,g5esis ( ,g5esis1 #cc--8,we mu/ decl9e to /ake ! au?ority ( ,jesus on a "q ( lit]>y criticism02 & ( ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #aie--8,t ! use by our ,"l ( su* a phrase z #8,moses wrote ( me' b9ds u to ! ,mosaic au?or%ip ( ! ,p5tateu* z a :ole1 ,i d n ?9k we ne$ to yield40 ,see our section on ,! ,p]son ( ,*ri/2 also ,ru% ,rhees1 ,life ( ,jesus1 #bdc1 #bdd4 ,p] contra1 see ,swayne1 ,our ,"l's ,k z ,man2 & ,crook]1 ,! ,new ,bible1 :o v unwisely claims t belief 9 a ,k5osis involves ! surr5d] ( ,*ri/'s au?ority & atonem5t4 ,x is inconceivable t any m]e creature %\ld say1 8,god is great] ?an ,i am10 or %\ld be spok5 ( z ultimately & 9 a my/]i\s way becom+ 8subject to ,god40 ,9 8 /ate ( humiliation ,*ri/ 0 subject to ! ,_s 7,acts #a3b--8;aft] t he _h giv5 comm&m5t ?r\gh ! ,holy ,_s02 #aj3ch--8;,god ano9t$ him ) ! ,holy ,_s 444 = ,god 0 ) him02 ,heb4#i3ad--8?r\gh ! et]nal ,_s (f]$ himself )\t blemi% unto ,god071 b 9 8 /ate ( exaltation ,*ri/ is ,"l ( ! ,_s 7 --#b ,cor4 #c3ah--,mey]71 giv+ ! ,_s & work+ ?r\gh ! ,_s4 ,heb4 #b3g1 m>g4--8,?\ made/ him = a little :ile l[] ?an ! angels40 ,on ! :ole subject1 see ,%$d1 ,hi/4 ,doctr9e1 #bfb1 #cea2 ,?omasius1 ,*ri/i ,p]son und ,w]k1 #a3fa-fd2 ,liddon1 ,our ,"l's ,div9ity1 #abg1 #bjg1 #deh2 p] contra1 see ,exam9ation ( ,liddon1 #beb1 #bid2 ,pr(essors ( ,&ov] ,sem9>y1 ,div9ity ( ,*ri/4 ,c4 ,! ,holy ,_s is recogniz$ z ,god4 7a7 ,he is spok5 ( z ,god2 7b7 ! attributes ( ,god are ascrib$ to him1 su* z life1 tru?1 love1 hol9ess1 et]nity1 omnipres5ce1 omnisci5ce1 omnipot5ce2 7c7 he does ! works ( ,god1 su* z creation1 reg5]ation1 resurrection2 7d7 he receives honor due only to ,god2 7e7 he is associat$ ) ,god on a foot+ ( equality1 bo? 9 ! =mula ( baptism & 9 ! apo/olic b5$ictions4 7a7 ,spok5 ( z ,god4 ,acts #e3c1 #d--8lie to ! ,holy ,_s 444 n li$ unto m51 b unto ,god02 #a ,cor4 #c3af--8ye are a temple ( ,god 444 ! ,_s ( ,god dwelle? 9 y02 #f3ai--8y\r body is a temple ( ! ,holy ,_s02 #ab3d-f 8same ,_s 444 same ,"l 444 same ,god1 :o worke? all ?+s 9 all0--8,! div9e ,tr9ity is "h indicat$ 9 an asc5d+ climax1 9 su* a way t we pass f ! ,_s :o be/[s ! gifts to ! ,"l ,*ri/ :o is s]v$ by means ( !m1 & f9ally to ,god1 :o z ! absolute fir/ cause & possessor ( all ,*ri/ian p[]s works ! entire sum ( all *>ismatic gifts 9 all :o are gift$0 7,mey] 9 loco74 7b7 ,attributes ( ,god4 ,life3 ,rom4 #h3b--8,_s ( life40 ,tru?3 ,john #af3ac 8,_s ( tru?40 ,love3 ,rom4 #ae3cj--8love ( ! ,_s40 ,hol9ess3 ,eph4 #d3cj--8! ,holy ,_s ( ,god40 ,et]nity3 ,heb4 #i3ad--8! et]nal ,_s40 ,omnipres5ce3 ,ps4 #aci3g--8,:i!r %all ,i g f ?y ,_s80 ,omnisci5ce3 #a ,cor4 #ab3aa--8;all ^! includ+ gifts ( heal+s & miracles worke? ! "o & ! same ,_s1 divid+ to ea* "o sev]ally ev5 z he w40 7c7 ,works ( ,god4 ,creation3 ,g54 #a3b1 m>g4--8,_s ( ,god 0 brood+ ^u ! face ( ! wat]s40 ,ca/+ out ( demons3 ,mat4 #ab3bh--8;,b if ,i by ! ,_s ( ,god ca/ out demons40 ,conviction ( s93 ,john #af3h--8;convict ! _w 9 respect ( s940 ,reg5]ation3 ,john #c3h--8;born ( ! ,_s02 ,tit4 #c3e--8r5ew+ ( ! ,holy ,_s40 ,resurrection3 ,rom4 #h3aa--8;give life also to y\r mortal bodies ?r\gh 8 ,_s02 #a ,cor4 #ae3de--8,! la/ ,adam became a life-giv+ _s40 7d7 ,honor due to ,god4 #a ,cor4 #c3af--8ye are a temple ( ,god 444 ! ,_s ( ,god dwelle? 9 y0--he :o inhabits ! temple is ! object ( wor%ip !re4 ,see also ! next item4 7e7 ,associat$ ) ,god4 ,=mula ( baptism3 ,mat4 #bh3ai--8;baptiz+ !m into ! "n ( ! ,fa!r & ( ! ,son & ( ! ,holy ,_s40 ,if ! baptismal =mula is wor%ip1 !n we h "h wor%ip paid to ! ,_s4 ,apo/olic b5$ictions3 #b ,cor4 #ac3ad--8,! grace ( ! ,"l ,jesus ,*ri/ & ! love ( ,god1 & ! communion ( ! ,holy ,_s be ) y all40 ,if ! apo/olic b5$ictions are pray]s1 !n we h "h a pray] to ! ,_s4 #a ,pet4 #a3b--8;=ekn[l$ge ( ,god ! ,fa!r 444 sanctification ( ! ,_s 444 spr9kl+ ( ! blood ( ,jesus ,*ri/40 ,on ,heb4 #i3ad1 ,k5drick1 ,com4 9 loco1 int]prets3 8,(f]s himself by virtue ( an et]nal _s :i* dwells )9 him & imp>ts to 8 sacrifice a spiritual & an et]nal efficacy4 ,! #8_s' "h spok5 ( 0 n1 !n1 ! #8,holy ,_s'2 x 0 n 8 purely div9e nature2 x 0 t bl5d+ ( 8 div9e nature ) 8 human p]sonality :i* =ms ! my/]y ( 8 be+1 t #8_s ( hol9ess' by virtue ( :i* he 0 decl>$ #8! ,son ( ,god ) p[]1' on acc\nt ( 8 resurrection f ! dead40 ,hovey adds a note to ,k5drick's ,comm5t>y1 9 loco1 z foll[s3 8,?is adjective #8et]nal' naturally sugge/s t ! ^w #8,_s' ref]s to ! high] & div9e nature ( ,*ri/4 ,8 truly human nature1 on its spiritual side1 0 inde$ et]nal z to ! future1 b s also is ! _s ( e man4 ,! unique & sup]lative value ( ,*ri/'s self-sacrifice seems to h be5 due to ! impulse ( ! div9e side ( 8 nature40 ,! phrase 8et]nal _s0 w\ld !n mean 8 div9ity4 ,to bo? ^! int]pretations we pref] t :i* makes ! passage ref] to ! ,holy ,_s1 & we cite 9 support ( ?is view ,acts #a3b--8;he _h giv5 comm&m5t ?r\gh ! ,holy ,_s unto ! apo/les02 #aj3ch--8;,god ano9t$ him ) ! ,holy ,_s40 ,on #a ,cor4 #b3aj1 ,mason1 ,fai? ( ! ,gospel1 #fc1 rem>ks3 8,! ,_s ( ,god f9ds no?+ ev5 9 ,god :i* baffles 8 scrut9y4 ,8 #8se>*' is n a seek+ = k yet beyond him4444 ,no?+ b ,god c\ld se>* ! dep?s ( ,god40 ,z _s is no?+ less ?an ! inmo/ pr9ciple ( life1 & ! _s ( man is man himself1 s ! _s ( ,god mu/ be ,god 7see #a ,cor4 #b3aa--,mey]74 ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce1 moreov]1 express$ z x is 9 ! pray]s & hymns ( ! *ur*1 furni%es an argum5t = ! deity ( ! ,holy ,_s simil> to t = ! deity ( ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,:5 our eyes are op5$ to see ,*ri/ z a ,savior1 we are compell$ to recognize ! "w 9 u ( a div9e ,_s :o has tak5 ( ! ?+s ( ,*ri/ & has %[n !m to u2 & ?is div9e ,_s we necess>ily di/+ui% bo? f ! ,fa!r & f ! ,son4 ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce1 h[ev]1 is n an orig9al & indep5d5t witness to ! deity ( ! ,holy ,_s3 x simply %[s :at ! *ur* has held to be ! natural & un=c$ int]pretation ( ! ,scriptures1 & s confirms ! ,scripture argum5t already adduc$4 ,! ,holy ,_s is ,god himself p]sonally pres5t 9 ! believ]4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,if #8,_s ( ,god' no m implies deity ?an does #8angel ( ,god1' :y is n ! ,holy ,_s call$ simply ! angel or mess5g]1 ( ,god80 ,walk]1 ,! ,_s & ! ,inc>nation1 #ccg--8,! ,holy ,_s is ,god 9 8 inn]mo/ be+ or ess5ce1 ! pr9ciple ( life ( bo? ! ,fa!r & ! ,son2 t 9 :i* ,god1 bo? z ,fa!r & ,son1 does ev]y?+1 & 9 :i* he comes to u & is 9 u increas+ly ?r\gh 8 manife/ations4 ,?r\gh ! work+ & indwell+ ( ?is ,holy ,_s1 ,god 9 8 p]son ( ,son 0 fully inc>nate 9 ,*ri/40 ,g\ld1 ,am4 ,com4 on #a ,cor4 #b3aa--8;,= :o among m5 kn[e? ! ?+s ( a man1 save ! _s ( ! man1 :i* is 9 him8 ev5 s ! ?+s ( ,god none kn[e?1 save ! ,_s ( ,god0--8,! analogy mu/ n be pu%$ too f>1 z if ! ,_s ( ,god & ,god 7 coxt5sive t]ms1 z ! correspond+ t]ms are1 sub/antially1 9 man4 ,! po9t ( ! analogy is evid5tly self-k1 & 9 bo? cases ! contra/ is betwe5 ! _s )9 & any?+ outside40 ,&rew ,murray1 ,_s ( ,*ri/1 #adj--8,we mu/ n expect always to feel ! p[] ( ! ,_s :5 x works4 ,scripture l9ks p[] & weakness 9 a wond]ful way1 n z succe$+ ea* o!r b z exi/+ toge!r4 #8,i 0 ) y 9 weakness 444 my prea*+ 0 9 p[]' 7#a ,cor4 #b3c72 #8:5 ,i am weak !n am ,i /rong' 7#b ,cor4 #ab3aj74 ,! p[] is ! p[] ( ,god giv5 to fai?1 & fai? gr[s /rong 9 ! d>k4444 ,he :o w\ld comm& nature mu/ fir/ & mo/ absolutely obey h]4444 ,we want to get possession ( ! ,p[]1 & use x4 ,god wants ! ,p[] to get possession ( u1 & use u40 ,?is pro( ( ! deity ( ! ,holy ,_s is n invalidat$ by ! limitations ( 8 "w "u ! ,old ,te/am5t disp5sation4 ,john #g3ci--8;= ! ,holy ,_s 0 n yet0--means simply t ! ,holy ,_s c\ld n fulfill 8 peculi> (fice z ,reveal] ( ,*ri/ until ! aton+ "w ( ,*ri/ %\ld be accompli%$4 ,john #g3ci is to be int]pret$ 9 ! light ( o!r ,scriptures :i* ass]t ! ag5cy ( ! ,holy ,_s "u ! old disp5sation 7,ps4 #ea3aa--8take n ?y holy ,_s f me07 & :i* describe 8 peculi> (fice "u ! new disp5sation 7,john #af3ad1 #ae--8;he %all take ( m9e1 & %all decl>e x unto y074 ,limitation 9 ! mann] ( ! ,_s's "w 9 ! ,o4 ,t4 involv$ a limitation 9 ! ext5t & p[] ( x also4 ,p5teco/ 0 ! fl[+ =? ( a tide ( spiritual influ5ce :i* _h hi!rto be5 damm$ up4 ,h5ce=? ! ,holy ,_s 0 ! ,_s ( ,jesus ,*ri/1 tak+ ( ! ?+s ( ,*ri/ & %[+ !m1 apply+ 8 f9i%$ "w to human he>ts1 & r5d]+ ! hi!rto localiz$ ,savior omnipres5t ) 8 scatt]$ foll[]s to ! end ( "t4 ,"u ! conditions ( 8 humiliation1 ,*ri/ 0 a s]vant4 ,all au?ority 9 heav5 & e>? 0 giv5 him only aft] 8 resurrection4 ,h5ce he c\ld n s5d ! ,holy ,_s until he asc5d$4 ,! "m c %[ (f h] son only :5 he is fully gr[n4 ,! ,holy ,_s c\ld reveal ,*ri/ only :5 !re 0 a complete ,*ri/ to reveal4 ,! ,holy ,_s c\ld fully sanctify1 only aft] ! example & motive ( hol9ess 7 furni%$ 9 ,*ri/'s life & dea?4 ,ar*] ,butl]3 8,! div9e ,arti/ c\ld n fitly desc5d to make ! copy1 be=e ! orig9al _h be5 provid$40 ,& yet ! ,holy ,_s is 8! et]nal ,_s0 7,heb4 #i3ad71 & he n only exi/$1 b also wr\ght1 9 ,old ,te/am5t times4 #b ,pet4 #a3ba--8m5 spake f ,god1 be+ mov$ by ! ,holy ,_s0--seems to fix ! mean+ ( ! phrase 8! ,holy ,_s10 :]e x appe>s 9 ! ,o4 ,t4 ,be=e ,*ri/ 8! ,holy ,_s 0 n yet0 7,john #g3ci71 j z be=e ,edison electricity 0 n yet4 ,!re 0 j z mu* electricity 9 ! _w be=e ,edison z !re is n[4 ,edison has only taught u its exi/5ce & h[ to use x4 ,/ill we c say t1 be=e ,edison1 electricity1 z a means ( light+1 w>m+ & transport+ p1 _h no exi/5ce4 ,s until ,p5teco/1 ! ,holy ,_s1 z ! reveal] ( ,*ri/1 80 n yet40 ,augu/9e calls ,p5teco/ ! dies natalis1 or bir?day1 ( ! ,holy ,_s2 & = ! same reason t we call ! day :5 ,m>y br\ght =? h] fir/born son ! bir?day ( ,jesus ,*ri/1 ?\gh be=e ,abraham 0 born1 ,*ri/ 04 ,! ,holy ,_s _h be5 engag$ 9 ! creation1 & _h inspir$ ! prophets1 b (ficially1 z ,m$iator betwe5 m5 & ,*ri/1 8! ,holy ,_s 0 n yet40 ,he c\ld n %[ ! ?+s ( ,*ri/ until ! ?+s ( ,*ri/ 7 ready to be %[n4 ,see ,gordon1 ,m9i/ry ( ! ,_s1 #ai-be2 ,pr(4 ,j4 ,s4 ,gubelmann1 ,p]son & ,"w ( ! ,holy ,_s 9 ,o4 ,t4 ,times4 ,= pro(s ( ! deity ( ! ,holy ,_s1 see ,walk]1 ,doctr9e ( ! ,holy ,_s2 ,h>e1 ,mission ( ! ,com=t]2 ,p>k]1 ,! ,p>aclete2 ,c>d9al ,mann+1 ,temporal ,mission ( ! ,holy ,gho/2 ,dick1 ,lectures on ,!ology1 #a3cda-cej4 ,fur!r ref]5ces w be giv5 9 connection ) ! pro( ( ! ,holy ,_s's p]sonality4 #b4 ,intimations ( ! ,old ,te/am5t4 ,! passages :i* seem to %[ t ev5 9 ! ,old ,te/am5t !re are ?ree :o are implicitly recogniz$ z ,god may be class$ "u f\r heads3 ,a4 ,passages :i* seem to tea* plurality ( "s sort 9 ! ,godhead4 7a7 ,! plural n\n is employ$1 & t ) a plural v]b--a use rem>kable1 :5 we consid] t ! s+ul> 0 also 9 exi/5ce2 7b7 ,god uses plural pron\ns 9 speak+ ( himself2 7c7 ,jehovah di/+ui%es himself f ,jehovah2 7d7 a ,son is ascrib$ to ,jehovah2 7e7 ! ,_s ( ,god is di/+ui%$ f ,god2 7f7 !re are a ?reefold ascription & a ?reefold b5$iction4 7a7 ,g54 #bj3ac--8;,god caus$ plural me to w&] f my fa!r's h\se02 #ce3g--8;built !re an alt>1 & call$ ! place ,el-,be?-el2 because !re ,god 0 reveal$ plural unto him40 7b7 ,g54 #a3bf--8,let u make man 9 our image1 aft] our lik5ess02 #c3bb--8;,behold1 ! man is become z "o ( u02 #aa3g--8;,come1 let u g d[n1 & !re conf\nd _! language02 ,is4 #f3h--8,:om %all ,i s5d1 & :o w g = u80 7c7 ,g54 #ai3bd--8,!n ,jehovah ra9$ ^u ,sodom & ^u ,gomorrah brim/one & fire f ,jehovah out ( heav502 ,hos4 #a3g--8;,i w h m]cy ^u ! h\se ( ,judah1 & w save !m by ,jehovah1 _! ,god02 cf4 #b ,tim4 #a3ah--8,! ,"l grant unto him to f9d m]cy ( ! ,"l 9 t day0--?\gh ,ellicott "h decides adv]sely to ! ,tr9it>ian ref]5ce4 7d7 ,ps4 #b3g--8,?\ art my son2 ?is day h ,i begott5 !e02 ,prov4 #cj3d--8,:o ha? e/abli%$ all ! ends ( ! e>?8 ,:at is 8 "n1 & :at is 8 son's "n1 if ?\ kn[e/80 7e7 ,g54 #a3a & #b1 m>g4--8,god creat$ 444 ! ,_s ( ,god 0 brood+02 ,ps4 #cc3f--8;,by ! ^w ( ,jehovah 7 ! heav5s made1 ,& all ! ho/ ( !m by ! brea? _s ( 8 m\?02 ,is4 #dh3af--8! ,"l ,jehovah ha? s5t me1 & 8 ,_s02 #fc3g1 #aj--8lov+ k9dnesses ( ,jehovah 444 griev$ 8 holy ,_s40 7f7 ,is4 #f3c--! trisagion3 8,holy1 holy1 holy02 ,num4 #f3bd-bf--8;,jehovah bless !e1 & keep !e3 ,jehovah make 8 face to %9e ^u !e1 & be graci\s unto !e3 ,jehovah lift up 8 c\nt5ance ^u !e1 & give !e peace40 ,x has be5 sugge/$ t z ,baal 0 wor%ip$ 9 diff]5t places & "u diff]5t names1 z ,baal-,b]i?1 ,baal-hanan1 ,baal-peor1 ,baal-zeebub1 & 8 prie/s c\ld call ^u any "o ( ^! z possess+ c]ta9 p]sonifi$ attributes ( ,baal1 :ile yet ! :ole 0 call$ by ! plural t]m 8,baalim10 & ,elijah c\ld say3 8,call ye ^u y\r ,gods10 s 8,elohim0 may be ! collective designation ( ! ,god :o 0 wor%ip$ 9 diff]5t localities2 see ,rob]tson ,smi?1 ,old ,te/am5t 9 ! ,jewi% ,*ur*1 #bbi4 ,b ?is ignores ! fact t ,baal is always address$ 9 ! s+ul>1 nev] 9 ! plural1 :ile ! plural 8,elohim0 is ! t]m commonly us$ 9 addresses to ,god4 ,?is seems to %[ t 8,baalim0 is a collective t]m1 :ile 8,elohim0 is n4 ,s :5 ,ewald1 ,lehre von ,gott1 #b3ccc1 di/+ui%es five names ( ,god1 correspond+ to five great p]iods ( ! hi/ory ( ,israel1 viz41 ! 8,almighty0 ( ! ,patri>*s1 ! 8,jehovah0 ( ! ,cov5ant1 ! 8,god ( ,ho/s0 ( ! ,mon>*y1 ! 8,holy ,"o0 ( ! ,deut]onomi/ & ! lat] prophetic age1 & ! 8,our ,"l0 ( ,judaism1 he ignores ! fact t ^! designations are none ( !m conf9$ to ! times to :i* !y are attribut$1 ?\gh !y may h be5 pr$om9antly us$ 9 ^? times4 ,! fact t is sometimes us$ 9 a n>r[] s5se1 z applicable to ! ,son 7,ps4 #de3f2 cf4 ,heb4 #a3h71 ne$ n prev5t u f believ+ t ! t]m 0 orig9ally *os5 z conta9+ an allusion to a c]ta9 plurality 9 ! div9e nature4 ,nor is x suffici5t to call ?is plural a simple pluralis maje/aticus2 s9ce x is easi] to d]ive ?is common figure f div9e usage ?an to d]ive ! div9e usage f ?is common figure--especially :5 we consid] ! con/ant t5d5cy ( ,israel to poly!ism4 ,ps4 #de3f2 cf4 ,heb4 #a3h--8( ! ,son he sai?1 ,?y ?rone1 ,o ,god1 is = ev] & ev]40 ,"h x is ,god :o calls ,*ri/ 8,god0 or 8,elohim40 ,! t]m ,elohim has "h acquir$ ! significance ( a s+ul>4 ,x 0 once ?\ght t ! royal /yle ( spee* 0 a cu/om ( a lat] date ?an ! "t ( ,moses4 ,ph>aoh does n use x4 ,9 ,g54 #da3da-dd1 he says3 8,i h set !e ov] all ! l& ( ,egypt 444 ,i am ,ph>aoh40 ,b lat] inve/igations seem to prove t ! plural = ,god 0 us$ by ! ,canaanites be=e ! ,hebrew occupation4 ,! "o ,ph>aoh is call$ 8my gods0 or 8my god10 indiff]5tly4 ,! ^w 8ma/]0 is usually f\nd 9 ! plural 9 ! ,o4 ,t4 7cf4 ,g54 #bd3i1 #ea2 #ci3ai2 #dj3a74 ,! plural gives utt]ance to ! s5se ( awe4 ,x signifies magnitude or complet5ess4 7,see ,! ,bible ,/ud5t1 ,aug4 #aijj3fg47 ,?is anci5t ,hebrew application ( ! plural to ,god is (t5 expla9$ z a m]e plural ( dignity1 "o :o comb9es 9 himself _m reasons = adoration 7 f to fe>1 to adore74 ,oehl]1 ,o4 ,t4 ,!ology1 #a3abh-acj1 calls x a 8quantitative plural10 signify+ unlimit$ greatness4 ,! ,hebrews _h _m plural =ms1 :]e we %\ld use ! s+ul>1 z 8heav5s0 in/ead ( 8heav510 8wat]s0 in/ead ( 8wat]40 ,we too speak ( 8news10 8wages10 & say 8y0 in/ead ( 8?\02 see ,f4 ,w4 ,rob]tson1 on ,g5esis1 #ab4 ,b ! ,*ur* ,fa!rs1 su* z ,b>nabas1 ,ju/9 ,m>tyr1 ,ir5u1 ,!ophilus1 ,epiphanius1 & ,!odoret1 saw 9 ?is plural an allusion to ! ,tr9ity1 & we are incl9$ to foll[ !m4 ,:5 f9ite ?+s 7 pluraliz$ to express man's rev]5ce1 x w\ld be f> m natural to pluralize ! "n ( ,god4 ,& ,god's purpose 9 secur+ ?is pluralization may h be5 m f>-rea*+ & intellig5t ?an man's4 ,! ,holy ,_s :o presid$ ov] ! developm5t ( revelation may well h direct$ ! use ( ! plural 9 g5]al1 & ev5 ! adoption ( ! plural "n ,elohim 9 p>ticul>1 ) a view to ! future unfold+ ( tru? ) reg>d to ! ,tr9ity4 ,we !re=e diss5t f ! view ( ,hill1 ,g5etic ,philosophy1 #cbc1 #ccj--8,! ,hebrew religion1 ev5 mu* lat] ?an ! "t ( ,moses1 z x exi/$ 9 ! popul> m9d1 01 accord+ to ! prophetic writ+s1 f> remov$ f a real mono!ism1 & consi/$ 9 ! wav]+ acceptance ( ! prem95ce ( a tribal ,god1 ) a /rong incl9ation t[>ds a g5]al poly!ism4 ,x is impossible !re=e to suppose t any?+ approa*+ ! philosophical mono!ism ( mod]n !ology c\ld h be5 elaborat$ or ev5 ent]ta9$ by primitive man4444 #8,?\ %alt h no o!r gods be=e me' 7,ex4 #bj3c71 ! fir/ precept ( ,hebrew mono!ism1 0 n und]/ood at fir/ z a d5ial ( ! h]$it>y poly!i/ic fai?1 b m]ely z an exclusive claim to wor%ip & ob$i5ce40 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son says1 9 a simil> /ra91 t 8we c expla9 ! idolatr\s t5d5cies ( ! ,jews only on ! supposition t !y _h lurk+ notions t _! ,god 0 a m]ely national god4 ,moses seems to h und]/ood ! doctr9e ( ! div9e unity1 b ! ,jews did n40 ,to ! views ( bo? ,hill & ,rob9son we reply t ! primitive intuition ( ,god is n t ( _m1 b t ( ,"o4 ,paul tells u t poly!ism is a lat] & retrogressive /age ( developm5t1 due to man's s9 7,rom4 #a3ai-be74 ,we pref] ! /atem5t ( ,mc,laren3 8,! plural ,elohim is n a survival f a poly!i/ic /age1 b expresses ! div9e nature 9 ! manifoldness ( its fulnesses & p]fections1 r ?an 9 ! ab/ract unity ( its be+0--&1 we may add1 expresses ! div9e nature 9 its ess5tial fulness1 z a complex ( p]sonalities4 ,see ,conant1 ,ges5ius' ,hebrew ,gramm>1 #ajh2 ,gre51 ,hebrew ,gramm>1 #cjf2 ,girdle/one1 ,o4 ,t4 ,synonyms1 #ch1 #ec2 ,alex&] on ,psalm #aa3g2 #bi3a2 #eh3aa4 ,b4 ,passages relat+ to ! ,angel ( ,jehovah4 7a7 ,! angel ( ,jehovah id5tifies himself ) ,jehovah2 7b7 he is id5tifi$ ) ,jehovah by o!rs2 7c7 he accepts wor%ip due only to ,god4 ,?\gh ! phrase 8angel ( ,jehovah0 is sometimes us$ 9 ! lat] ,scriptures to d5ote a m]ely human mess5g] or creat$ angel1 x seems 9 ! ,old ,te/am5t1 ) h>dly m ?an a s+le exception1 to designate ! pre-inc>nate ,logos1 ^: manife/ations 9 angelic or human =m =e%ad[$ 8 f9al com+ 9 ! fle%4 7a7 ,g54 #bb3aa1 #af--8! angel ( ,jehovah call$ unto him ,abraham1 :5 ab\t to sacrifice ,isaac 444 ,by myself h ,i sworn1 sai? ,jehovah02 #ca3aa1 #ac--8! angel ( ,god said unto me ,jacob 444 ,i am ! ,god ( ,be?-el40 7b7 ,g54 #af3i1 #ac--8;angel ( ,jehovah said unto h] 444 & %e call$ ! "n ( ,jehovah t spake unto h]1 ,?\ art a ,god t see?02 #dh3ae1 #af--8! ,god :o ha? f$ me 444 ! angel :o ha? r$eem$ me40 7c7 ,ex4 #c3b1 #d1 #e--8! angel ( ,jehovah appe>$ unto him 444 ,god call$ unto him out ( ! mid/ ( ! bu% 444 put (f ?y %oes f (f ?y feet02 ,judges #ac3bj-bb--8;angel ( ,jehovah asc5d$4444 ,manoah & 8 wife 444 fell on _! faces 444 ,manoah said 444 ,we %all surely die1 because we h se5 ,god40 ,! 8angel ( ! ,"l0 appe>s to be a human mess5g] 9 ,haggai #a3ac--8;,haggai1 ,jehovah's mess5g]02 a creat$ angel 9 ,mat4 #a3bj--8;an angel ( ! ,"l call$ ,gabriel appe>$ unto0 ,joseph2 9 ,acts #c3bf--8;an angel ( ! ,"l spake unto ,philip02 & 9 #ab3g--8;an angel ( ! ,"l /ood by him0 7,pet]74 ,b commonly1 9 ! ,o4,t41 ! 8angel ( ,jehovah0 is a !ophany1 a self-manife/ation ( ,god4 ,! only di/9ction is t betwe5 ,jehovah 9 himself & ,jehovah 9 manife/ation4 ,! appe>ances ( 8! angel ( ,jehovah0 seem to be prelim9>y manife/ations ( ! div9e ,logos1 z 9 ,g54 #ah3b1 #ac--8?ree m5 /ood ov] aga9/ him ,abraham 444 ,& ,jehovah said unto ,abraham02 ,dan4 #c3be1 #bh--8! aspect ( ! f\r? is l a son ( ! gods4444 ,bless$ be ! ,god 444 :o ha? s5t 8 angel40 ,! ,n4,t4 8angel ( ! ,"l0 does n p]mit1 ! ,o4,t4 8angel ( ! ,"l0 requires1 wor%ip 7,rev4 #bb3h1 #i--8,see ?\ d x n02 cf4 ,ex4 #c3e--8put (f ?y %oes074 ,z support+ ?is int]pretation1 see ,h5g/5b]g1 ,*ri/ology1 #a3ajg-abc2 ,j4 ,pye ,smi?1 ,scripture ,te/imony to ! ,messiah4 ,z oppos+ x1 see ,h(mann1 ,s*riftbeweis1 #a3cbi1 #cgh2 ,kurtz1 ,hi/ory ( ,old ,cov5ant1 #a3aha4 ,on ! :ole subject1 see ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahgi3eic-fae4 ,c4 ,descriptions ( ! div9e ,wisdom & ,^w4 7a7 ,wisdom is repres5t$ z di/9ct f ,god1 & z et]nally exi/+ ) ,god2 7b7 ! ,^w ( ,god is di/+ui%$ f ,god1 z executor ( 8 w f ev]la/+4 7a7 ,prov4 #h3a--8;,do? n wisdom cry80 ,cf4 ,mat4 #aa3ai--8wisdom is ju/ifi$ by h] works02 ,luke #g3ce--8wisdom is ju/ifi$ ( all h] *ildr502 #aa3di--8,!re=e also said ! wisdom ( ,god1 ,i w s5d unto !m prophets & apo/les02 ,prov4 #h3bb1 #cj1 #ca--8;,jehovah possess$ me 9 ! beg9n+ ( 8 way1 ,be=e 8 works ( old4444 ,i 0 by him1 z a ma/] workman3 ,& ,i 0 daily 8 delight4444 ,& my delight 0 ) ! sons ( m502 cf4 #c3ai--8;,jehovah by wisdom f\nd$ ! e>?10 & ,heb4 #a3b--8;8 ,son 444 ?r\gh :om 444 he made ! worlds40 7b7 ,ps4 #ajg3bj--8;,he s5de? 8 ^w1 & heale? !m02 #aai3hi--8;,= ev]1 ,o ,jehovah1 ,?y ^w is settl$ 9 heav502 #adg3ae-ah--8;,he s5de? out 8 comm&m5t4444 ,he s5de? out 8 ^w40 ,9 ! ,apocryphal book entitl$ ,wisdom1 #g3bf1 #bh1 wisdom is describ$ z 8! brightness ( ! et]nal light10 8! unspott$ mirror ( ,god's maje/y10 & 8! image ( 8 goodness0--rem9d+ u ( ,heb4 #a3c--8! effulg5ce ( 8 glory1 & ! v image ( 8 sub/ance40 ,9 ,wisdom1 #i3i1 #aj1 wisdom is repres5t$ z be+ pres5t ) ,god :5 he made ! _w1 & ! au?or ( ! book prays t wisdom may be s5t to him out ( ,god's holy heav5s & f ! ?rone ( 8 glory4 ,9 #a ,esdras #d3ce-ch1 ,tru? 9 a simil> way is spok5 ( z p]sonal3 8,great is ! ,tru? & /rong] ?an all ?+s4 ,all ! e>? calle? ^u ! ,tru?1 & ! heav5 blesse? x2 all works %ake & tremble at x1 & ) x is no unrighte\s ?+4 ,z = ! ,tru?1 x endure? & is always /rong2 x live? & conqu]e? =ev]more40 ,x mu/ be ackn[l$g$ t 9 none ( ^! descriptions is ! idea ( p]sonality cle>ly develop$4 ,/ill less is x true t ,john ! apo/le d]iv$ 8 doctr9e ( ! ,logos f ! int]pretations ( ^! descriptions 9 ,philo ,judu4 ,john's doctr9e 7,john #a3a-ah7 is radically diff]5t f ! ,alex&rian ,logos-idea ( ,philo4 ,?is la/ is a ,platoniz+ speculation ^u ! m$iat+ pr9ciple betwe5 ,god & ! _w4 ,philo seems at times to v]ge t[>ds a recognition ( p]sonality 9 ! ,logos1 ?\gh 8 mono!i/ic scruples lead him at o!r times to take back :at he has giv51 & to describe ! ,logos ei!r z ! ?\ght ( ,god or z its expression 9 ! _w4 ,b ,john is ! fir/ to pres5t to u a consi/5t view ( ?is p]sonality1 to id5tify ! ,logos ) ! ,messiah1 & to di/+ui% ! ,^w f ! ,_s ( ,god4 ,dorn]1 9 8 ,hi/ory ( ! ,doctr9e ( ! ,p]son ( ,*ri/1 #a3ac-de1 & 9 8 ,sy/em ( ,doctr9e1 #a3cdh1 #cdi1 gives ! be/ acc\nt ( ,philo's doctr9e ( ! ,logos4 ,he says t ,philo calls ! ,logos 1 1 4 ,:e!r ?is is any?+ m ?an p]sonification is d\btful1 = ,philo also calls ! ,logos ! 4 ,c]ta9ly1 s f> z he makes ! ,logos a di/9ct p]sonality1 he makes him also a subord9ate be+4 ,x is *>g$ t ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity owes its orig9 to ! ,platonic philosophy 9 its ,alex&rian union ) ,jewi% !ology4 ,b ,platonism _h no ,tr9ity4 ,! tru? is t by ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity ,*ri/ianity secur$ itself aga9/ false hea!n ideas ( ,god's multiplicity & imman5ce1 z well z aga9/ false ,jewi% ideas ( ,god's unity & transc5d5ce4 ,x owes no?+ to =eign s\rces4 ,we ne$ n assign to ,john's gospel a lat] orig91 9 ord] to acc\nt = its doctr9e ( ! ,logos1 any m ?an we ne$ to assign a lat] orig9 to ! ,synoptics 9 ord] to acc\nt = _! doctr9e ( a suff]+ ,messiah4 ,bo? doctr9es 7 equally unkn[n to ,philo4 ,philo's ,logos does n & _c become man4 ,s says ,dorn]4 ,we/cott1 9 ,bible ,comm5t>y on ,john1 ,introd41 xv-xviii1 & on ,john #a3a--8,! !ological use ( ! t]m 9 ,john's gospel appe>s to be d]iv$ directly f ! ,pale/9ian ,memra1 & n f ! ,alex&rian ,logos40 ,in/ead ( ,philo's doctr9e be+ a /epp+-/one f ,judaism to ,*ri/ianity1 x 0 a /umbl+-/one4 ,x _h no doctr9e ( ! ,messiah or ( ! atonem5t4 ,b5nett & ,ad5y1 ,bib4 ,introd41 #cdj--8,! diff]5ce betwe5 ,philo & ,john may be /at$ ?us3 ,philo's ,logos is ,reason1 :ile ,john's is ,^w2 ,philo's is imp]sonal1 :ile ,john's is p]sonal2 ,philo's is n inc>nate1 :ile ,john's is inc>nate2 ,philo's is n ! ,messiah1 :ile ,john's is ! ,messiah40 ,philo liv$ f ,b4 ,c4 #aj or #bj to c]ta9ly ,a4 ,d4 #dj1 :5 he w5t at ! head ( a ,jewi% embassy to ,rome1 to p]suade ! ,emp]or to ab/a9 f claim+ div9e honor f ! ,jews4 ,9 8 ,de ,opifice ,mundi he says3 8,! ,^w is no?+ else b ! intelligible _w40 ,he calls ! ,^w ! 8*a9b&10 8pilot10 8/e]sman10 ( all ?+s4 ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #fi--8,logos 9 ,philo mu/ be translat$ #8,reason4' ,b 9 ! ,t>gums1 or e>ly ,jewi% p>aphrases ( ! ,o4 ,t41 ! #8,^w' ( ,jehovah 7,memra1 ,devra7 is con/antly spok5 ( z ! effici5t in/rum5t ( ! div9e action1 9 cases :]e ! ,o4 ,t4 speaks ( ,jehovah himself1 #8,! ,^w ( ,god' _h come to be us$ p]sonally1 z almo/ equival5t to ,god manife/+ himself1 or ,god 9 action40 ,george ,h4 ,gilb]t1 9 ,biblical ,_w1 ,jan4 #ahii3dd--8;,john's use ( ! t]m ,logos 0 sugge/$ by ,greek philosophy1 :ile at ! same "t ! cont5t ( ! ^w is ,jewi%40 ,hat*1 ,hibb]t ,lectures1 #agd-bjh--8,! ,/oics inve/$ ! ,logos ) p]sonality4 ,!y 7 ,moni/s & !y made & ! active & ! passive =ms ( ! "o pr9ciple4 ,"s made ,god a mode ( matt]--natura naturata2 o!rs made matt] a mode ( ,god--natura naturans ! _w a self-evolution ( ,god4 ,! ,platonic =ms1 z manifold expressions ( a s+le 1 7 express$ by a s+ul> t]m1 ,logos1 r ?an ! ,logoi1 ( ,god4 ,f ?is ,logos proce$ all =ms ( m9d or reason4 ,s held ,philo3 #8,! m9d is an (f%oot f ! div9e & happy s\l 7( ,god71 an (f%oot n sep>at$ f him1 = no?+ div9e is cut (f & disjo9$1 b only ext5d$4' ,philo's ,logos is n only =m b =ce--,god's creative en]gy--! elde/-born ( ! #8,i am1' :i* robes itself ) ! _w z ) a ve/ure1 ! high prie/'s robe1 embroid]$ ) all ! =ces ( ! se5 & unse5 worlds40 ,w5dt1 ,tea*+ ( ,jesus1 #a3ec--8,philo c>ries ! transc5d5ce ( ,god to its logical conclusions4 ,! ,jewi% doctr9e ( angels is exp&$ 9 8 doctr9e ( ! ,logos4 ,! ,alex&rian philosoph]s aft]w>ds repres5t$ ,*ri/ianity z a spiritualiz$ ,judaism4 ,b a philosophical sy/em dom9at$ by ! idea ( ! div9e transc5d5ce nev] c\ld h furni%$ a motive = mission>y labors l ^? ( ,paul4 ,philo's belief 9 transc5d5ce abat$ 8 r$emptive hopes4 ,b1 conv]sely1 ! r$emptive hopes ( or?odox ,judaism sav$ x f "s ( ! errors ( exclusive transc5d5ce40 ,see a quotation f ,siegfri$1 9 ,s*r]'s ,hi/ory ( ! ,jewi% ,p1 article on ,philo3 8,philo's doctr9e grew out ( ,god's di/9ction & di/ance f ! _w4 ,x 0 duali/ic4 ,h5ce ! ne$ ( m$iat+ pr9ciples1 "s be+ less ?an ,god & m ?an creature4 ,! cosmical significance ( ,*ri/ bridg$ ! gulf betwe5 ,*ri/ianity & contempor>y ,greek ?\ght4 ,*ri/ianity /&s = a ,god :o is reveal$4 ,b a ,logos-doctr9e l t ( ,philo may reveal less ?an x conceals4 ,in/ead ( ,god inc>nate = our salvation1 we may h m]ely a m$iat+ pr9ciple betwe5 ,god & ! _w1 z 9 ,arianism40 ,! prec$+ /atem5t is furni%$ 9 sub/ance by ,pr(4 ,william ,adams ,br[n4 ,) x we agree1 add+ only ! rem>k t ! ,alex&rian philosophy gave to ,*ri/ianity1 n ! sub/ance ( its doctr9e1 b only ! t]m9ology = its expression4 ,! tru? :i* ,philo grop$ aft]1 ! ,apo/le ,john seiz$ & publi%$1 z only he c\ld1 :o _h he>d1 se51 & h&l$ 8! ,^w ( life0 7#a ,john #a3a74 8,! ,*ri/ian doctr9e ( ! ,logos 0 p]haps be=e any?+ else an ef=t to express h[ ,jesus ,*ri/ 0 ,god 771 & yet 9 ano!r s5se 0 n ,god 7 72 t is to say1 0 n ! :ole ,godhead0 7quot$ 9 ,m>cus ,dods1 ,expositors' ,bible1 on ,john #a3a74 ,see also ,k5drick1 9 ,*ri/ian ,review1 #bf3cfi-cii2 ,gloag1 9 ,presb4 & ,ref4 ,rev41 #ahia3de-eg2 ,rville1 ,doctr9e ( ! ,logos 9 ,john & ,philo2 ,godet on ,john1 ,g]m4 transl41 #ac1 #ace2 ,cudwor?1 ,intellectual ,sy/em1 #b3cbj-ccc2 ,press5s1 ,life ( ,jesus ,*ri/1 #hc2 ,hag5ba*1 ,hi/4 ,doct41 #a3aad-aag2 ,liddon1 ,our ,"l's ,div9ity1 #ei-ga2 ,conant on ,prov]bs1 #ec4 ,d4 ,descriptions ( ! ,messiah4 7a7 ,he is "o ) ,jehovah2 7b7 yet he is 9 "s s5se di/9ct f ,jehovah4 7a7 ,is4 #i3f--8unto u a *ild is born1 unto u a son is giv5 444 & 8 "n %all be call$ ,wond]ful ,c\nselor1 ,mighty ,god1 ,ev]la/+ ,fa!r1 ,pr9ce ( ,peace02 ,micah #e3b--8?\ ,be?lehem 444 :i* art little 444 out ( !e %all "o come =? unto me t is to be rul] 9 ,israel2 ^: go+s =? are f ( old1 f ev]la/+40 7b7 ,ps4 #de3f1 #g--8,?y ?rone1 ,o ,god1 is = ev] & ev]4444 ,!re=e ,god1 ?y ,god1 ha? ano9t$ !e02 ,mal #c3a--8;,i s5d my mess5g]1 & he %all prep>e ! way be=e me3 & ! ,"l1 :om ye seek1 w sudd5ly come to 8 temple2 & ! mess5g] ( ! cov5ant1 :om ye desire40 ,h5d]son1 9 8 ,comm5t>y on ?is passage1 po9ts out t ! ,messiah is "h call$ 8! ,"l0 or 8! ,sov]eign0--a title n[h]e giv5 9 ?is =m 7) ! article7 to any b ,jehovah2 t he is pr$ict$ z com+ to ! temple z its proprietor2 & t he is id5tifi$ ) ! angel ( ! cov5ant1 else:]e %[n to be "o ) ,jehovah himself4 ,x is to be rememb]$1 9 consid]+ ?is1 z well z o!r classes ( passages previ\sly cit$1 t no ,jewi% writ] be=e ,*ri/'s com+ _h succe$$ 9 con/ruct+ f !m a doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity4 ,only to ^? :o br+ to !m ! light ( ,new ,te/am5t revelation d !y %[ _! real mean+4 ,our g5]al conclusion ) reg>d to ! ,old ,te/am5t intimations mu/ !re=e be t1 :ile !y d n by !mselves furni% a suffici5t basis = ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity1 !y conta9 ! g]m ( x1 & may be us$ 9 confirmation ( x :5 its tru? is sub/antially prov$ f ! ,new ,te/am5t4 ,t ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity is n pla9ly taught 9 ! ,hebrew ,scriptures is evid5t f ! fact t ,jews unite ) ,mohamm$ans 9 accus+ tr9it>ians ( poly!ism4 ,x %\ld n surprise u t ! ,old ,te/am5t tea*+ on ?is subject is undevelop$ & obscure4 ,! fir/ necessity 0 t ! ,unity ( ,god %\ld be insi/$ on4 ,until ! dang] ( idolatry 0 pa/1 a cle> revelation ( ! ,tr9ity might h be5 a h9drance to religi\s progress4 ,! *ild n[1 l ! race !n1 mu/ le>n ! unity ( ,god be=e x c pr(itably be taught ! ,tr9ity1--else x w fall into tri!ism2 see ,g>d9]1 ,o4 ,t4 & ,n4 ,t41 #di4 ,we %\ld n !re=e beg9 our pro( ( ! ,tr9ity ) a ref]5ce to passages 9 ! ,old ,te/am5t4 ,we %\ld speak ( ^! passages1 inde$1 z furni%+ intimations ( ! doctr9e r ?an pro( ( x4 ,yet1 aft] hav+ f\nd pro( ( ! doctr9e 9 ! ,new ,te/am5t1 we may expect to f9d traces ( x 9 ! ,old :i* w corroborate our conclusions4 ,z a matt] ( fact1 we %all see t traces ( ! idea ( a ,tr9ity are f\nd n only 9 ! ,hebrew ,scriptures b 9 "s ( ! hea!n religions z well4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity und]lay ! ,o4 ,t41 unp]ceiv$ by its writ]s1 0 fir/ recogniz$ 9 ! economic revelation ( ,*ri/ianity1 & 0 fir/ cle>ly enunciat$ 9 ! necess>y evolution ( ,*ri/ian doctr9e40 ,,ii4 ,^! ,?ree are s describ$ 9 ,scripture t we are compell$ to conceive ( !m z di/9ct ,p]sons4 #a4 ,! ,fa!r & ! ,son are p]sons di/9ct f ea* o!r4 7a7 ,*ri/ di/+ui%es ! ,fa!r f himself z 8ano!r02 7b7 ! ,fa!r & ! ,son are di/+ui%$ z ! begett] & ! begott52 7c7 ! ,fa!r & ! ,son are di/+ui%$ z ! s5d] & ! s5t4 7a7 ,john #e3cb1 #cg--8;,x is ano!r t be>e? witness ( me 444 ! ,fa!r t s5t me1 he ha? borne witness ( me40 7b7 ,ps4 #b3g--8,?\ art my ,son2 ?is day h ,i begott5 !e02 ,john #a3ad--8! only begott5 f ! ,fa!r02 #ah--8! only begott5 ,son02 #c3af--8;gave 8 only begott5 ,son40 7c7 ,john #aj3cf--8say ye ( him1 :om ! ,fa!r sanctifi$ & s5t into ! _w1 ,?\ blaspheme/2 because ,i said1 ,i am ! ,son ( ,god802 ,gal #d3d--8:5 ! fulness ( ! "t came1 ,god s5t =? 8 ,son40 ,9 ^! passages ! ,fa!r is repres5t$ z objective to ! ,son1 ! ,son to ! ,fa!r1 & bo? ! ,fa!r & ,son to ! ,_s4 #b4 ,! ,fa!r & ! ,son are p]sons di/9ct f ! ,_s4 7a7 ,jesus di/+ui%es ! ,_s f himself & f ! ,fa!r2 7b7 ! ,_s proce$s f ! ,fa!r2 7c7 ! ,_s is s5t by ! ,fa!r & by ! ,son4 7a7 ,john #ad3af1 #ag--8;,i w pray ! ,fa!r1 & he %all give y ano!r ,com=t]1 t he may be ) y = ev]1 ev5 ! ,_s ( tru?0--or 8,_s ( ! tru?10 he ^: "w x is to reveal & apply ! tru?1 & especially to make manife/ him :o is ! tru?4 ,jesus _h be5 _! ,com=t]3 he n[ promises !m ano!r ,com=t]4 ,if he himself 0 a p]son1 !n ! ,_s is a p]son4 7b7 ,john #ae3bf--8! ,_s ( tru? :i* proce$e? f ! ,fa!r40 7c7 ,john #ad3bf--8! ,com=t]1 ev5 ! ,holy ,_s1 :om ! ,fa!r w s5d 9 my "n02 #ae3bf--8:5 ! ,com=t] is come1 :om ,i w s5d unto y f ! ,fa!r02 ,gal4 #d3f--8;,god s5t =? ! ,_s ( 8 ,son into our he>ts40 ,! ,greek *ur* holds t ! ,_s proce$s f ! ,fa!r only2 ! ,lat9 *ur*1 t ! ,_s proce$s bo? f ! ,fa!r & f ! ,son4 ,! true =mula is3 ,! ,_s proce$s f ! ,fa!r ?r\gh or by 7n 8&07 ! ,son4 ,see ,hag5ba*1 ,hi/ory ( ,doctr9e1 #a3bfb1 #bfc4 ,mob]ly1 ,atonem5t & ,p]sonality1 #aie--8,! ,filioque is a valuable def5ce ( ! tru? t ! ,holy ,_s is n simply ! ab/ract second ,p]son ( ! ,tr9ity1 b r ! ,_s ( ! inc>nate ,*ri/1 reproduc+ ,*ri/ 9 human he>ts1 & reveal+ 9 !m ! mean+ ( true manhood40 #c4 ,! ,holy ,_s is a p]son4 ,a4 ,designations prop] to p]sonality are giv5 him4 7a7 ,! mascul9e pron\n 1 ?\gh is neut]2 7b7 ! "n 1 :i* _c be translat$ by 8com=t01 or be tak5 z ! "n ( any ab/ract influ5ce4 ,! ,com=t]1 ,in/ructor1 ,patron1 ,guide1 ,advocate1 :om ?is t]m br+s be=e u1 mu/ be a p]son4 ,?is is evid5t f its application to ,*ri/ 9 #a ,john #b3a--8we h an ,advocate----) ! ,fa!r1 ,jesus ,*ri/ ! righte\s40 7a7 ,john #af3ad--8;,he 77 %all glorify me02 9 ,eph4 #a3ad also1 "s ( ! be/ au?orities1 includ+ ,tis*5dorf 7#h? ed471 read 1 ! mascul9e pron\n3 8:o is an e>ne/ ( our inh]itance40 ,b 9 ,john #ad3af-ah1 is foll[$ by ! neut]s & 1 because _h int]v5$4 ,grammatical & n !ological consid]ations controll$ ! writ]4 ,see ,g4 ,b4 ,/ev5s1 ,johann9e ,!ology1 #ahi-bag1 especially on ! di/9ction betwe5 ,*ri/ & ! ,holy ,_s4 ,! ,holy ,_s is ano!r p]son ?an ,*ri/1 9 spite ( ,*ri/'s say+ ( ! com+ ( ! ,holy ,_s3 8,i come unto y40 7b7 ,john #af3g--8;if ,i g n away1 ! ,com=t] w n come unto y40 ,! ^w 1 z appe>s f #a ,john #b3a1 quot$ above1 is a t]m ( broad] mean+ ?an m]ely 8,com=t]40 ,! ,holy ,_s is1 inde$1 z has be5 said1 8! "m-pr9ciple 9 ! ,godhead10 & 8z "o :om 8 "m com=te?0 s ,god by 8 ,_s com=ts 8 *ildr5 7,is4 #ff3ac74 ,b ! ,holy ,_s is also an ,advocate ( ,god's claims 9 ! s\l1 & ( ! s\l's int]e/s 9 pray] 7,rom4 #h3bf--8make? int]cession = u074 ,he com=ts n only by be+ our advocate1 b by be+ our in/ructor1 patron1 & guide2 & all ^! ideas are f\nd atta*+ to ! ^w 9 good ,greek usage4 ,! ^w inde$ is a v]bal adjective1 signify+ 8call$ to "o's aid10 h5ce a 8help]02 ! idea ( enc\ragem5t is includ$ 9 x1 z well z ^? ( com=t & ( advocacy4 ,see ,we/cott1 ,bible ,com41 on ,john #ad3af2 ,crem]1 ,lexicon ( ,n4 ,t4 ,greek1 9 voce4 ,t4 ,dwight1 9 ,s4 ,s4 ,times1 on ,john #ad3af--8,! fundam5tal mean+ ( ! ^w 1 :i* is a v]bal adjective1 is #8call$ to "o's aid1' & ?us1 :5 us$ z a n\n1 x conveys ! idea ( #8help]4' ,?is m g5]al s5se probably atta*es to its use 9 ,john's ,gospel1 :ile 9 ! ,epi/le 7#a ,john #b3a1 #b7 x conveys ! idea ( ,jesus act+ z advocate on our behalf be=e ,god z a ,judge40 ,s ! ,lat9 advocatus signifies "o 8call$ to0--i4 e41 call$ 9 to aid1 c\nsel1 plead4 ,9 ?is connection ,jesus says3 8,i w n leave y orphans0 7,john #ad3ah74 ,cumm+1 ,?r\gh ! ,et]nal ,_s1 #bbh--8;,z ! orphan$ family1 9 ! day ( ! p>5t's dea?1 ne$ "s fri5d :o %all light5 _! s5se ( loss by 8 own pres5ce ) !m1 s ! ,holy ,_s is #8call$ 9' to supply ! pres5t love & help :i* ! ,twelve are los+ 9 ! dea? ( ,jesus40 ,a4 ,a4 ,hodge1 ,pop4 ,lectures1 #bcg--8,! ,roman #8cli5t1' ! poor & dep5d5t man1 call$ 9 8 #8patron' to help him 9 all 8 ne$s4 ,! patron ?\ght =1 advis$1 direct$1 support$1 def5d$1 suppli$1 re/or$1 com=t$ 8 cli5t 9 all 8 complications4 ,! cli5t1 ?\gh weak1 ) a p[]ful patron1 0 socially & politically secure =ev]40 ,b4 ,8 "n is m5tion$ 9 imm$iate connection ) o!r p]sons1 & 9 su* a way z to imply 8 own p]sonality4 7a7 ,9 connection ) ,*ri/ians2 7b7 9 connection ) ,*ri/2 7c7 9 connection ) ! ,fa!r & ! ,son4 ,if ! ,fa!r & ! ,son are p]sons1 ! ,_s mu/ be a p]son also4 7a7 ,acts #ae3bh--8;x seem$ good to ! ,holy ,_s1 & to u40 7b7 ,john #af3ad--8;,he %all glorify me3 = he %all take ( m9e1 & %all decl>e x unto y02 cf4 #ag3d--8;,i glorifi$ !e on ! e>?40 7c7 ,mat4 #bh3bi--8;baptiz+ !m into ! "n ( ! ,fa!r & ( ! ,son & ( ! ,holy ,_s02 #b ,cor4 #ac3ad--8! grace ( ! ,"l ,jesus ,*ri/1 & ! love ( ,god1 & ! communion ( ! ,holy ,_s1 be ) y all02 ,jude #ba--8pray+ 9 ! ,holy ,_s1 keep y\rselves 9 ! love ( ,god1 look+ = ! m]cy ( our ,"l ,jesus ,*ri/40 #a ,pet4 #a3a1 #b--8;elect 444 accord+ to ! =ekn[l$ge ( ,god ! ,fa!r1 9 sanctification ( ! ,_s1 unto ob$i5ce & spr9kl+ ( ! blood ( ,jesus ,*ri/40 ,yet x is noticeable 9 all ^! passages t !re is no obtrusion ( ! ,holy ,_s's p]sonality1 z if he desir$ to draw att5tion to himself4 ,! ,holy ,_s %[s1 n himself1 b ,*ri/4 ,l ,john ! ,bapti/1 he is a m]e voice1 & s is an example to ,*ri/ian prea*]s1 :o are !mselves 8made 444 suffici5t z m9i/]s 444 ( ! ,_s0 7#b ,cor4 #c3f74 ,8 lead+ is !re=e (t5 unp]ceiv$2 he s jo9s himself to u t we inf] 8 pres5ce only f ! new & holy ex]cises ( our own m9ds2 he cont9ues to "w 9 u ev5 :5 8 pres5ce is ignor$ & 8 purity is outrag$ by our s9s4 ,c4 ,he p]=ms acts prop] to p]sonality4 ,t :i* se>*es1 kn[s1 speaks1 te/ifies1 reveals1 conv9ces1 comm&s1 /rives1 moves1 helps1 guides1 creates1 recreates1 sanctifies1 inspires1 makes int]cession1 ord]s ! affairs ( ! *ur*1 p]=ms miracles1 raises ! dead--_c be a m]e p[]1 influ5ce1 efflux1 or attribute ( ,god1 b mu/ be a p]son4 ,g54 #a3b1 m>g4--8! ,_s ( ,god 0 brood+ ^u ! face ( ! wat]s02 #f3c--8,my ,_s %alt n /rive ) man = ev]02 ,luke #ab3ab--8! ,holy ,_s %all tea* y 9 t v h\r :at ye ought to say02 ,john #c3h--8;born ( ! ,_s0--"h ,b5gel translates3 8! ,_s brea!s :]e he wills1 & ?\ he>e/ 8 voice0--see also ,gordon1 ,m9i/ry ( ! ,_s1 #aff2 #af3h--8;convict ! _w 9 respect ( s91 & ( righte\sness1 & ( judgm5t02 ,acts #b3d--8! ,_s gave !m utt]ance02 #h3bi--8! ,_s said unto ,philip1 ,g ne>02 #aj3ai1 #bj--8! ,_s said unto him ,pet]1 ,behold1 ?ree m5 seek !e4444 g ) !m 444 = ,i h s5t !m02 #ac3b--8! ,holy ,_s said1 ,sep>ate me ,b>nabas & ,saul02 #af3f1 #g--8;=bidd5 ( ! ,holy ,_s 444 ,_s ( ,jesus suff]$ !m n02 ,rom4 #h3aa--8;give life also to y\r mortal bodies ?r\gh 8 ,_s02 #bf--8! ,_s also helpe? our infirmity 444 make? int]cession = u02 #ae3ai--8;9 ! p[] ( signs & wond]s1 9 ! p[] ( ! ,holy ,_s02 #a ,cor4 #b3aj1 #aa--8! ,_s se>*e? all ?+s4444 ?+s ( ,god none kn[e?1 save ! ,_s ( ,god02 #ab3h-aa--;di/ributes spiritual gifts 8to ea* "o sev]ally ev5 z he w0--"h ,mey] calls att5tion to ! words 8z he w10 z prov+ ! p]sonality ( ! ,_s2 #b ,pet4 #a3ba--8m5 spake f ,god1 be+ mov$ by ! ,holy ,_s02 #a ,pet4 #a3b--8sanctification ( ! ,_s40 ,h[ c a p]son be giv5 9 v>i\s measures8 ,we answ]1 by be+ p]mitt$ to "w 9 our behalf ) v>i\s degrees ( p[]4 ,dorn]3 8,to be p[] does n belong to ! imp]sonal40 ,d4 ,he is affect$ z a p]son by ! acts ( o!rs4 ,t :i* c be resi/$1 griev$1 vex$1 blasphem$1 mu/ be a p]son2 = only a p]son c p]ceive insult & be (f5d$4 ,! blasphemy aga9/ ! ,holy ,gho/ _c be m]ely blasphemy aga9/ a p[] or attribute ( ,god1 s9ce 9 t case blasphemy aga9/ ,god w\ld be a less crime ?an blasphemy aga9/ 8 p[]4 ,t aga9/ :i* ! unp>donable s9 c be committ$ mu/ be a p]son4 ,is4 #fc3aj--8!y rebell$ & griev$ 8 holy ,_s02 ,mat4 #ab3ca--8;,e s9 & blasphemy %all be =giv5 unto m52 b ! blasphemy aga9/ ! ,_s %all n be =giv502 ,acts #e3c1 #d1 #i--8lie to ! ,holy ,gho/ 444 ?\ ha/ n li$ unto m5 b unto ,god4444 agre$ toge!r to try ! ,_s ( ! ,"l02 #g3ea--8ye d always resi/ ! ,holy ,_s02 ,eph4 #d3cj--8;grieve n ! ,holy ,_s ( ,god40 ,satan _c be 8griev$40 ,selfi%ness c be ang]$1 b only love c be griev$4 ,blasphem+ ! ,holy ,_s is l blasphem+ "o's own "m4 ,! passages j quot$ %[ ! ,_s's possession ( an emotional nature4 ,h5ce we read ( 8! love ( ! ,_s0 7,rom4 #ae3cj74 ,! unutt]able sigh+s ( ! ,*ri/ian 9 int]cessory pray] 7,rom4 #h3bf1 #bg7 reveal ! m9d ( ! ,_s1 & %[ ! inf9ite dep?s ( feel+ :i* are awak5$ 9 ,god's he>t by ! s9s & ne$s ( m54 ,^! deep desires & emotions :i* are only p>tially communicat$ to u1 & :i* only ,god c und]/&1 are conclusive pro( t ! ,holy ,_s is a p]son4 ,!y are only ! ov]fl[ into u ( ! inf9ite f\nta9 ( div9e love to :i* ! ,holy ,_s unites u4 ,z ,*ri/ 9 ! g>d5 8began to be sorr[ful & sore tr\bl$0 7,mat4 #bf3cg71 s ! ,holy ,_s is sorr[ful & sore tr\bl$ at ! ignor+1 despis+1 resi/+ ( 8 "w1 on ! "p ( ^? :om he is try+ to rescue f s9 & to lead out into ! fre$om & joy ( ! ,*ri/ian life4 ,lu?>dt1 9 ,s4 ,s4 ,times1 ,may #bf1 #ahhh--8;,e s9 c be =giv5--ev5 ! s9 aga9/ ! ,son ( man--except ! s9 aga9/ ! ,holy ,_s4 ,! s9 aga9/ ! ,son ( man c be =giv5 because he c be misconceiv$4 ,= he did n appe> z t :i* he really 04 ,ess5ce & appe>ance1 tru? & reality1 contradict$ ea* o!r40 ,h5ce ,jesus c\ld pray3 8,fa!r1 =give !m1 = !y "k n :at !y d0 7,luke #bc3cd74 ,! (fice ( ! ,holy ,_s1 h[ev]1 is to %[ to m5 ! nature ( _! conduct1 & to s9 aga9/ him is to s9 aga9/ light & )\t excuse4 ,see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #big-cac4 ,salmond1 9 ,expositor's ,greek ,te/am5t1 on ,eph4 #d3cj--8,:at love is 9 u po9ts truly1 ?\gh tremul\sly1 to :at love is 9 ,god4 ,b 9 u love1 9 proportion z x is true & sov]eign1 has bo? its wra?-side & its grief-side2 & s mu/ x be ) ,god1 h[ev] difficult = u to ?9k x out40 ,e4 ,he manife/s himself 9 visible =m z di/9ct f ! ,fa!r & ! ,son1 yet 9 direct connection ) p]sonal acts p]=m$ by !m4 ,mat4 #c3af1 #ag--8;,jesus1 :5 he 0 baptiz$1 w5t up /raightway f ! wat]3 & lo1 ! heav5s 7 op5$ unto him1 & he saw ! ,_s ( ,god desc5d+ z a dove1 & com+ ^u him2 & lo1 a voice out ( ! heav5s1 say+1 ,?is is my belov$ ,son1 9 :om ,i am well pleas$02 ,luke #c3ba1 #bb--8;,jesus also hav+ be5 baptiz$1 & pray+1 ! heav5 0 op5$1 & ! ,holy ,_s desc5d$ 9 a bodily =m1 z a dove1 ^u him1 & a voice came out ( heav51 ,?\ art my belov$ ,son2 9 !e ,i am well pleas$40 ,"h are ! pray] ( ,jesus1 ! approv+ voice ( ! ,fa!r1 & ! ,holy ,_s desc5d+ 9 visible =m to ano9t ! ,son ( ,god = 8 "w4 8,i ad ,jordanem1 et videbis ,tr9itatem40 ,f4 ,?is ascription to ! ,_s ( a p]sonal subsi/5ce di/9ct f t ( ! ,fa!r & ( ! ,son _c be expla9$ z p]sonification2 =3 7a7 ,?is w\ld be to int]pret sob] prose by ! canons ( poetry4 ,su* su/a9$ p]sonification is contr>y to ! g5ius ( ev5 ,hebrew poetry1 9 :i* ,wisdom itself is mo/ naturally int]pret$ z designat+ a p]sonal exi/5ce4 7b7 ,su* an int]pretation w\ld r5d] a multitude ( passages ei!r tautological1 mean+less1 or absurd1--z c be easily se5 by sub/itut+ = ! "n ,holy ,_s ! t]ms :i* are wrongly held to be its equival5ts2 su* z ! p[]1 or influ5ce1 or efflux1 or attribute ( ,god4 7c7 ,x is contradict$1 moreov]1 by all ^? passages 9 :i* ! ,holy ,_s is di/+ui%$ f 8 own gifts4 7a7 ,! ,bible is n prim>ily a book ( poetry1 al?\gh !re is poetry 9 x4 ,x is m prop]ly a book ( hi/ory & law4 ,ev5 if ! me?ods ( allegory 7 us$ by ! ,psalmi/s & ! ,prophets1 we %\ld n expect !m l>gely to *>act]ize ! ,gospels & ,epi/les2 #a ,cor4 #ac3d--8,love suff]e? long1 & is k9d0--is a r>e in/ance 9 :i* ,paul's /yle takes on ! =m ( poetry4 ,yet x is ! ,gospels & ,epi/les :i* mo/ con/antly repres5t ! ,holy ,_s z a p]son4 7b7 ,acts #aj3ch--8;,god ano9t$ him ,jesus ) ! ,holy ,_s & ) p[]0 ano9t$ him ) p[] & ) p[]8 ,rom4 #ae3ac--8;ab\nd 9 hope1 9 ! p[] ( ! ,holy ,_s0 9 ! p[] ( ! p[] ( ,god8 #ai--8;9 ! p[] ( signs & wond]s1 9 ! p[] ( ! ,holy ,_s0 9 ! p[] ( ! p[] ( ,god8 #a ,cor4 #b3d--8;demon/ration ( ! ,_s & ( p[]0 demon/ration ( p[] & ( p[]8 7c7 ,luke #a3ce--8! ,holy ,_s %all come ^u !e1 & ! p[] ( ! ,mo/ ,high %all ov]%ad[ !e02 #d3ad--8;,jesus return$ 9 ! p[] ( ! ,_s into ,galilee02 #a ,cor4 #ab3d1 #h1 #aa--;aft] m5tion ( ! gifts ( ! ,_s1 su* z wisdom1 k1 fai?1 heal+s1 miracles1 prophecy1 disc]n+ ( spirits1 tongues1 int]pretation ( tongues1 all ^! are trac$ to ! ,_s :o be/[s !m3 8all ^! worke? ! "o & ! same ,_s1 divid+ to ea* "o sev]ally ev5 z he w40 ,"h is n only giv+1 b giv+ discreetly1 9 ! ex]cise ( an indep5d5t w su* z belongs only to a p]son4 ,rom4 #h3bf--8! ,_s himself make? int]cession = u0--mu/ be int]pret$1 if ! ,holy ,_s is n a p]son di/9ct f ! ,fa!r1 z mean+ t ! ,holy ,_s int]c$es ) himself4 8,! p]sonality ( ! ,holy ,_s 0 virtually reject$ by ! ,arians1 z x has s9ce be5 by ,s*lei]ma*]1 & x has be5 positively d5i$ by ! ,soc9ians0 7,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son74 ,g\ld1 ,bib4 ,!ol4 ,n4 ,t41 #hc1 #if--8,! ,twelve repres5t ! ,_s z s5t by ! ,son1 :o has be5 exalt$ t he may s5d ?is new p[] out ( ! heav5s4 ,paul repres5ts ! ,_s z br++ to u ! ,*ri/4 ,9 ! ,_s ,*ri/ dwells 9 u4 ,! ,_s is ! hi/oric ,jesus translat$ into t]ms ( univ]sal ,_s4 ,?r\gh ! ,_s we are 9 ,*ri/ & ,*ri/ 9 u4 ,! div9e ,indwell] is to ,paul alt]nately ,*ri/ & ! ,_s4 ,! ,_s is ! div9e pr9ciple inc>nate 9 ,jesus & expla9+ 8 prexi/5ce 7#b ,cor4 #c3ag1 #ah74 ,jesus 0 an inc>nation ( ! ,_s ( ,god40 ,?is seem+ id5tification ( ! ,_s ) ,*ri/ is to be expla9$ ^u ! gr\nd t ! div9e ess5ce is common to bo? & p]mits ! ,fa!r to dwell 9 & to "w ?r\gh ! ,son1 & ! ,son to dwell 9 & to "w ?r\gh ! ,_s4 ,x %\ld n bl9d u to ! equally pat5t ,scriptural fact t !re are p]sonal relations betwe5 ,*ri/ & ! ,holy ,_s1 & "w done by ! latt] 9 :i* ,*ri/ is ! object & n ! subject2 ,john #af3ad--8;,he %all glorify me3 = he %all take ( m9e1 & %all decl>e x unto y40 ,! ,holy ,_s is n "s ?+1 b "s "o2 n 1 b 2 ,*ri/'s alt] ego1 or o!r self4 ,we %\ld !re=e make vivid our belief 9 ! p]sonality ( ,*ri/ & ( ! ,holy ,_s by address+ ea* ( !m frequ5tly 9 ! pray]s we (f] & 9 su* hymns z 8,jesus1 lov] ( my s\l10 & 8,come1 ,holy ,_s1 heav5ly ,dove60 ,on ! p]sonality ( ! ,holy ,_s1 see ,john ,ow51 9 ,works1 #c3fd-ib2 ,dick1 ,lectures on ,!ology1 #a3cda-cej4 ,,iii4 ,?is ,trip]sonality ( ! ,div9e ,nature is n m]ely economic & temporal1 b is imman5t & et]nal4 #a4 ,scripture pro( t ^! di/9ctions ( p]sonality are et]nal4 ,we prove ?is 7a7 f ^? passages :i* speak ( ! exi/5ce ( ! ,^w f et]nity ) ! ,fa!r2 7b7 f passages ass]t+ or imply+ ,*ri/'s prexi/5ce2 7c7 f passages imply+ int]c\rse betwe5 ! ,fa!r & ! ,son be=e ! f\ndation ( ! _w2 7d7 f passages ass]t+ ! creation ( ! _w by ,*ri/2 7e7 f passages ass]t+ or imply+ ! et]nity ( ! ,holy ,_s4 7a7 ,john #a3a1 #b--8;,9 ! beg9n+ 0 ! ,^w1 & ! ,^w 0 ) ,god1 & ! ,^w 0 ,god02 cf4 ,g54 #a3a--8;,9 ! beg9n+ ,god creat$ ! heav5s & ! e>?02 ,phil4 #b3f--8;exi/+ 9 ! =m ( ,god 444 on an equality ) ,god40 7b7 ,john #h3eh--8;be=e ,abraham 0 born1 ,i am02 #a3ah--8! only begott5 ,son1 :o is 9 ! bosom ( ! ,fa!r0 7,r4 ,v472 ,col4 #a3ae-ag--8;fir/born ( all creation0 or 8be=e e creature 444 he is be=e all ?+s40 ,9 ^! passages 8am0 & 8is0 indicate an et]nal fact2 ! pres5t t5se expresses p]man5t be+4 ,rev4 #bb3ac1 #ad--8;,i am ! ,alpha & ! ,omega1 ! fir/ & ! la/1 ! beg9n+ & ! end40 7c7 ,john #ag3e--8;,fa!r1 glorify ?\ me ) ?9e own self ) ! glory :i* ,i _h ) !e be=e ! _w 002 #bd--8,?\ lov$/ me be=e ! f\ndation ( ! _w40 7d7 ,john #a3c--8;,all ?+s 7 made ?r\gh him02 #a ,cor4 #h3f--8"o ,"l1 ,jesus ,*ri/1 ?r\gh :om are all ?+s02 ,col4 #a3af--8;all ?+s h be5 creat$ ?r\gh him & unto him02 ,heb4 #a3b--8?r\gh :om also he made ! worlds02 #aj--8,?\1 ,"l1 9 ! beg9n+ did/ lay ! f\ndation ( ! e>?1 & ! heav5s are ! works ( ?y h&s40 7e7 ,g54 #a3b--8! ,_s ( ,god 0 brood+0--exi/$ !re=e be=e creation2 ,ps4 #cc3f--8;by ! ^w ( ,jehovah 7 ! heav5s made2 & all ! ho/ ( !m by ! brea? ,_s ( 8 m\?02 ,heb4 #i3ad--8?r\gh ! et]nal ,_s40 ,) ^! passages be=e u1 we mu/ diss5t f ! /atem5t ( ,dr4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,ab\t ! ontologic ,tr9ity we "k absolutely no?+4 ,! ,tr9ity we c contemplate is simply a reveal$ "o1 "o ( economic manife/ations4 ,we may suppose t ! ontologic und]lies ! economic40 ,scripture compels u1 9 our judgm5t1 to g fur!r ?an ?is1 & to ma9ta9 t !re are p]sonal relations betwe5 ! ,fa!r1 ! ,son1 & ! ,holy ,_s indep5d5tly ( creation & ( "t2 9 o!r words we ma9ta9 t ,scripture reveals to u a social ,tr9ity & an int]c\rse ( love ap>t f & be=e ! exi/5ce ( ! univ]se4 ,love be=e "t implies di/9ctions ( p]sonality be=e "t4 ,!re are ?ree et]nal consci\snesses & ?ree et]nal wills 9 ! div9e nature4 ,we "h /ate only ! fact1--! explanation ( x1 & its reconciliation ) ! fundam5tal unity ( ,god is treat$ 9 our next section4 ,we n[ proce$ to %[ t ! two v>y+ sy/ems :i* ignore ?is trip]sonality are unscriptural & at ! same "t expos$ to philosophical objection4 #b4 ,errors refut$ by ! =ego+ passages4 ,a4 ,! ,sabellian4 ,sabellius 7( ,ptolemais 9 ,p5tapolis1 #bej7 held t ,fa!r1 ,son1 & ,holy ,_s are m]e developm5ts or revelations to creatures1 9 "t1 ( ! o!rwise conceal$ ,godhead--developm5ts :i*1 s9ce creatures w always exi/1 are n transitory1 b :i* at ! same "t are n et]nal a p>te ante4 ,god z unit$ to ! creation is ,fa!r2 ,god z unit$ to ,jesus ,*ri/ is ,son2 ,god z unit$ to ! *ur* is ,holy ,_s4 ,! ,tr9ity ( ,sabellius is !re=e an economic & n an imman5t ,tr9ity--a ,tr9ity ( =ms or manife/ations1 b n a necess>y & et]nal ,tr9ity 9 ! div9e nature4 ,"s h int]pret$ ,sabellius z d5y+ t ! ,tr9ity is et]nal a p>te po/1 z well z a p>te ante1 & z hold+ t1 :5 ! purpose ( ^! tempor>y manife/ations is accompli%$1 ! ,triad is resolv$ into ! ,monad4 ,?is view easily m]ges 9 ano!r1 :i* makes ! p]sons ( ! ,tr9ity m]e names = ! ev] %ift+ phases ( ! div9e activity4 ,! be/ /atem5t ( ! ,sabellian doctr9e1 accord+ to ! int]pretation fir/ m5tion$1 is t ( ,s*lei]ma*]1 translat$ ) comm5ts by ,moses ,/u>t1 9 ,biblical ,repository1 #f3a-af4 ,! "o un*ang+ ,god is diff]5tly reflect$ f ! _w on acc\nt ( ! _w's diff]5t receptivities4 ,praxeas ( ,rome 7#bjj7 ,noetus ( ,smyrna 7#bcj71 & ,b]yl ( ,arabia 7#bej7 advocat$ sub/antially ! same views4 ,!y 7 call$ ,mon>*ians 7 71 because !y believ$ n 9 ! ,triad1 b only 9 ! ,monad4 ,!y 7 call$ ,patripassians1 because !y held t1 z ,*ri/ is only ,god 9 human =m1 & ?is ,god suff]s1 !re=e ! ,fa!r suff]s4 ,knight1 ,colloquia ,p]ipatetica1 xlii1 sugge/s a connection betwe5 ,sabellianism & ,emanationism4 ,see ?is ,comp5dium1 on ,!ories :i* oppose ,creation4 ,a view simil> to t ( ,sabellius 0 held by ,horace ,bu%nell1 9 8 ,god 9 ,*ri/1 #aac-aae1 #acj sq41 #agb-age1 & ,*ri/ 9 ,!ology1 #aai1 #abj--8;,fa!r1 ,son & ,holy ,_s1 be+ incid5tal to ! revelation ( ,god1 may be & probably are f et]nity to et]nity1 inasmu* z ,god may h reveal$ himself f et]nity1 & c]ta9ly w reveal himself s long z !re are m9ds to "k him4 ,x may be1 9 fact1 ! nature ( ,god to reveal himself1 z truly z x is ( ! sun to %9e or ( liv+ m9d to ?9k40 ,he does n d5y ! imman5t ,tr9ity1 b simply says we "k no?+ ab\t x4 ,yet a ,tr9ity ( ,p]sons 9 ! div9e ess5ce itself he call$ pla9 tri!ism4 ,he pref]s 8in/rum5tal ,tr9ity0 to 8modal ,tr9ity0 z a designation ( 8 doctr9e4 ,! diff]5ce betwe5 ,bu%nell on ! "o h&1 & ,sabellius & ,s*lei]ma*] on ! o!r1 seems !n to be ! foll[+3 ,sabellius & ,s*lei]ma*] hold t ! ,"o becomes ?ree 9 ! process ( revelation1 & ! ?ree are only m$ia or modes ( revelation4 ,fa!r1 ,son1 & ,_s are m]e names appli$ to ^! modes ( ! div9e action1 !re be+ no int]nal di/9ctions 9 ! div9e nature4 ,?is is modalism1 or a modal ,tr9ity4 ,bu%nell /&s by ! ,tr9ity ( revelation alone1 & prote/s aga9/ any con/ructive reason+s ) reg>d to ! imman5t ,tr9ity4 ,yet 9 8 lat] writ+s he rev]ts to ,a?anasius & speaks ( ,god z et]nally 8?ree+ himself02 see ,fi%]1 ,edw>ds on ! ,tr9ity1 #gc4 ,lyman ,abbott1 9 ,! ,outlook1 proposes z illu/ration ( ! ,tr9ity1 #a4 ! arti/ work+ on 8 pictures2 #b4 ! same man tea*+ pupils h[ to pa9t2 #c4 ! same man ent]ta9+ 8 fri5ds at home4 ,he has n tak5 on ^! types ( conduct4 ,!y are n masks 7p]son71 nor (fices1 :i* he takes up & lays d[n4 ,!re is a ?reefold nature 9 him3 he is arti/1 tea*]1 fri5d4 ,god is complex1 & n simple4 ,i d n "k him1 till ,i "k him 9 all ^! relations4 ,yet x is evid5t t ,dr4 ,abbott's view provides no basis = love or = society )9 ! div9e nature4 ,! ?ree p]sons are b ?ree successive aspects or activities ( ! "o ,god4 ,g5]al ,grant1 :5 9 (fice1 0 b "o p]son1 ev5 ?\gh he 0 a fa!r1 a ,presid5t1 & a comm&] 9 *ief ( ! army & navy ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates4 ,x is evid5t t ?is !ory1 9 :atev] =m x may be held1 is f> f satisfy+ ! dem&s ( ,scripture4 ,scripture speaks ( ! second p]son ( ! ,tr9ity z exi/+ & act+ be=e ! bir? ( ,jesus ,*ri/1 & ( ! ,holy ,_s z exi/+ & act+ be=e ! =mation ( ! *ur*4 ,bo? h a p]sonal exi/5ce1 et]nal 9 ! pa/ z well z 9 ! future--:i* ?is !ory expressly d5ies4 ,a revelation t is n a self-revelation ( ,god is n hone/4 ,/u>t3 ,s9ce ,god is reveal$ z ?ree1 he mu/ be ess5tially or imman5tly ?ree1 back ( revelation2 else ! revelation w\ld n be true4 ,dorn]3 ,a ,tr9ity ( revelation is a misrepres5tation1 if !re is n beh9d x a ,tr9ity ( nature4 ,twe/5 prop]ly arrives at ! ?re5ess by consid]+1 n s mu* :at is involv$ 9 ! revelation ( ,god to u1 z :at is involv$ 9 ! revelation ( ,god to himself4 ,! unscripturalness ( ! ,sabellian doctr9e is pla91 if we rememb] t ^u ?is view ! ,?ree _c exi/ at once3 :5 ! ,fa!r says 8,?\ art my belov$ ,son0 7,luke #c3bb71 he is simply speak+ to himself2 :5 ,*ri/ s5ds ! ,holy ,_s1 he only s5ds himself4 ,john #a3a--8;,9 ! beg9n+ 0 ! ,^w1 & ! ,^w 0 ) ,god1 & ! ,^w 0 ,god0--8sets aside ! false notion t ! ,^w become p]sonal fir/ at ! "t ( creation1 or at ! inc>nation0 7,we/cott1 ,bib4 ,com4 9 loco74 ,mason1 ,fai? ( ! ,gospel1 #ej1 #ea--8,sabellius claim$ t ! ,unity became a ,tr9ity by expansion4 ,fa!rhood began ) ! _w4 ,god is n et]nally ,fa!r1 nor does he love et]nally4 ,we h only an imp]sonal1 un9telligible ,god1 :o has play$ ^u u & confus$ our und]/&+ by %[+ himself to u "u ?ree disguises4 ,be=e creation !re is no ,fa!rhood1 ev5 9 g]m40 ,accord+ to ,pfleid]]1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #b3bfi1 ,orig5 held t ! ,godhead might be repres5t$ by ?ree conc5tric circles2 ! wide/1 embrac+ ! :ole be+1 is t ( ! ,fa!r2 ! next1 t ( ! ,son1 :i* ext5ds to ! rational creation2 & ! n>r[e/ is t ( ! ,_s1 :o rules 9 ! holy m5 ( ! *ur*4 ,k+1 ,recon/ruction ( ,!ology1 #aib1 #aid--8,to affirm social relations 9 ! ,godhead is to ass]t absolute ,tri!ism4444 ,unit>ianism emphasizes ! humanity ( ,*ri/1 to pres]ve ! unity ( ,god2 ! true view emphasizes ! div9ity ( ,*ri/1 to pres]ve ! unity40 ,l4 ,l4 ,pa9e1 ,evolution ( ,tr9it>ianism1 #ada1 #bhg1 says t ,new ,engl& ,tr9it>ianism is *>act]iz$ by ?ree ?+s3 #a4 ,sabellian ,patripassianism2 ,*ri/ is all ! ,fa!r !re is1 & ! ,holy ,_s is ,*ri/'s cont9u$ life2 #b4 ,consub/antiality1 or community ( ess5ce1 ( ,god & man2 unlike ! ess5tial diff]5ce betwe5 ! creat$ & ! uncreat$ :i* ,platonic dualism ma9ta9$1 ?is !ory turns moral lik5ess into ess5tial lik5ess2 #c4 ,philosophical monism1 matt] itself be+ b an evolution ( ,_s4444 ,9 ! next =m ( ! sci5tific doctr9e ( evolution1 ! div95ess ( man becomes a vital tru?1 & out ( x arises a ,*ri/ology t removes ,jesus ( ,naz>e? inde$ out ( ! ord] ( absolute ,deity1 b at ! same "t exalts him to a place ( moral em95ce t is secure & supreme4 ,aga9/ ?is dang] ( reg>d+ ,*ri/ z a m]ely economic & tempor>y manife/ation ( ,god we c gu>d only by ma9ta9+ ! ,scriptural doctr9e ( an imman5t ,tr9ity4 ,mob]ly1 ,atonem5t & ,p]sonality1 #hf1 #afe--8,we _c incur any ,sabellian p]il :ile we ma9ta9--:at is fatal to ,sabellianism--t t :i* is reveal$ )9 ! div9e ,unity is n only a di/9ction ( aspects or ( names1 b a real reciprocity ( mutual relation4 ,"o #8aspect' _c contemplate1 or be lov$ by1 ano!r4444 ,sabellianism degrades ! p]sons ( ,deity into aspects4 ,b !re c be no mutual relation betwe5 aspects4 ,! heat & ! light ( flame _c sev]ally contemplate & be 9 love ) "o ano!r40 ,see ,bu%nell's doctr9e review$ by ,hodge1 ,essays & ,reviews1 #dcc-dgc4 ,on ! :ole subject1 see ,dorn]1 ,hi/4 ,doct4 ,p]son ( ,*ri/1 #b3aeb-afi2 ,%$d1 ,hi/4 ,doctr9e1 #a3bei2 ,baur1 ,lehre von d] ,dreie9igkeit1 #a3bef-cje2 ,?omasius1 ,*ri/i ,p]son und ,w]k #a3hc4 ,b4 ,! ,arian4 ,arius 7( ,alex&ria2 condemn$ by ,c\ncil ( ,nice1 #cbe7 held t ! ,fa!r is ! only div9e be+ absolutely )\t beg9n+2 ! ,son & ! ,holy ,_s1 ?r\gh :om ,god creates & recreates1 hav+ be5 !mselves creat$ out ( no?+ be=e ! _w 02 & ,*ri/ be+ call$ ,god1 because he is next 9 rank to ,god1 & is end[$ by ,god ) div9e p[] to create4 ,! foll[]s ( ,arius h diff]$ z to ! precise rank & claims ( ,*ri/4 ,:ile ,soc9us held ) ,arius t wor%ip ( ,*ri/ 0 obligatory1 ! lat] ,unit>ians h p]ceiv$ ! impropriety ( wor%ip+ ev5 ! highe/ ( creat$ be+s1 & h con/antly t5d$ to a view ( ! ,r$eem] :i* reg>ds him z a m]e man1 /&+ 9 a peculi>ly intimate relation to ,god4 ,= /atem5t ( ! ,arian doctr9e1 see ,j4 ,freeman ,cl>ke1 ,or?odoxy1 ,its ,tru?s & ,errors4 ,p] contra1 see ,s*ff]1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ba3a1 article on ,a?anasius & ! ,arian controv]sy4 ,! s-call$ ,a?anasian ,cre$1 :i* ,a?anasius nev] wrote1 is m prop]ly designat$ z ! ,symbolum ,quicumque4 ,x has also be5 call$1 ?\gh faceti\sly1 8! ,ana!masian ,cre$40 ,yet no error 9 doctr9e c be m p]il\s or wor?y ( condemnation ?an ! error ( ,arius 7#a ,cor4 #af3bb--8;,if any man love? n ! ,"l1 let him be ana!ma02 #a ,john #b3bc--8,:osoev] d5ie? ! ,son1 ! same ha? n ! ,fa!r02 #d3c--8;e _s t confesse? n ,jesus is n ( ,god3 & ?is is ! _s ( ! anti*ri/074 ,x reg>ds ,*ri/ z call$ ,god only by c\rtesy1 mu* z we give to a ,lieut5ant ,gov]nor ! title ( ,gov]nor4 ,be=e ! creation ( ! ,son1 ! love ( ,god1 if !re c\ld be love1 0 exp5d$ on himself4 ,gwatk91 ,/udies ( ,arianism3 8,! ,arian ,*ri/ is no?+ b a hea!n idol1 inv5t$ to ma9ta9 a hea!ni% ,supreme 9 hea!n isolation f ! _w4 ,! ne>] ! ,son is pull$ d[n t[>ds man by ! att5uation ( 8 ,godhead1 ! m remote f man becomes ! un%>$ ,godhead ( ! ,fa!r4 ,y h an tre ,suprme :o is practically unapproa*able1 a m]e ,"o-&-all1 de/itute ( p]sonality40 ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #ij1 #ia1 #aaj1 %[s ! imm5se importance ( ! controv]sy ) reg>d to & 4 ,c>lyle once sne]$ t 8! ,*ri/ian _w 0 torn 9 pieces ov] a diph?ong40 ,b ,c>lyle aft]w>ds came to see t ,*ri/ianity itself 0 at /ake1 & t x w\ld h dw9dl$ away to a leg5d1 if ! ,arians _h won4 ,arius appeal$ *iefly to logic1 n to ,scripture4 ,he claim$ t a ,son mu/ be y\ng] ?an 8 ,fa!r4 ,b he 0 ass]t+ ! pr9ciple ( hea!nism & idolatry1 9 dem&+ wor%ip = a creature4 ,! ,go?s 7 easily conv]t$ to ,arianism4 ,*ri/ 0 to !m a h]o-god1 a demigod1 & ! lat] ,go?s c\ld wor%ip ,*ri/ & hea!n idols imp>tially4 ,x is evid5t t ! !ory ( ,arius does n satisfy ! dem&s ( ,scripture4 ,a creat$ ,god1 a ,god ^: exi/5ce _h a beg9n+ & !re=e may come to an end1 a ,god made ( a sub/ance :i* once 0 n1 & !re=e a sub/ance diff]5t f t ( ! ,fa!r1 is n ,god1 b a f9ite creature4 ,b ! ,scripture speaks ( ,*ri/ z be+ 9 ! beg9n+ ,god1 ) ,god1 & equal ) ,god4 ,lu!r1 allud+ to ,john #a3a1 says3 8#8,! ,^w 0 ,god' is aga9/ ,arius2 #8! ,^w 0 ) ,god' is aga9/ ,sabellius40 ,! ,racovian ,cate*ism1 ,quaes4 #ahc1 #ahd1 #baa1 #bcf1 #bcg1 #bde1 #bdf1 tea*es t ,*ri/ is to be truly wor%ip$1 & !y are d5i$ to be ,*ri/ians :o refuse to adore him4 ,davidis 0 p]secut$ & di$ 9 prison = refus+ to wor%ip ,*ri/2 & ,soc9us 0 *>g$1 ?\gh probably unju/ly1 ) hav+ caus$ 8 imprisonm5t4 ,b>?olomew ,legate1 an ,essexman & an ,arian1 0 burn$ to dea? at ,smi?field1 ,m>* #ac1 #afac4 ,k+ ,james ,i ask$ him :e!r he did n pray to ,*ri/4 ,legate's answ] 0 t 8inde$ he _h pray$ to ,*ri/ 9 ! days ( 8 ignorance1 b n = ^! la/ sev5 ye>s02 :i* s %ock$ ,james t 8he spurn$ at him ) 8 foot40 ,at ! /ake ,legate /ill refus$ to recant1 & s 0 burn$ to a%es amid a va/ conflux ( p4 ,! v next mon? ano!r ,arian nam$ ,:iteman 0 burn$ at ,burton-on-,tr5t4 ,x requir$ c\rage1 ev5 a g5]ation lat]1 = ,john ,milton1 9 8 ,*ri/ian ,doctr9e1 to decl>e himself a high ,arian4 ,9 t treatise he tea*es t 8! ,son ( ,god did n exi/ f all et]nity1 is n coval or coss5tial or coqual ) ! ,fa!r1 b came into exi/5ce by ! w ( ,god to be ! next be+ to himself1 ! fir/-born & be/ belov$1 ! ,logos or ,^w ?r\gh :om all creation %\ld take its beg9n+s40 ,s ,milton reg>ds ! ,holy ,_s z a creat$ be+1 inf]ior to ! ,son & possibly conf9$ to our heav5s & e>?4 ,milton's ,arianism1 h[ev]1 is *>act]i/ic ( 8 lat]1 r ?an 8 e>li]1 writ+s2 comp>e ! ,ode on ,*ri/'s ,nativity ) ,p>adise ,lo/1 #c3chc-cia2 & see ,masson's ,life ( ,milton1 #a3ci2 #f3hbc1 #hbd2 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,great ,poets & _! ,!ology1 #bfj-bfb4 ,dr4 ,samuel ,cl>ke1 :5 ask$ :e!r ! ,fa!r :o _h creat$ c\ld n also de/roy ! ,son1 said t he _h n consid]$ ! "q4 ,ralph ,waldo ,em]son broke ) 8 *ur* & left ! m9i/ry because he c\ld n celebrate ! ,"l's ,supp]1--x impli$ a pr(\nd] rev]5ce = ,jesus ?an he c\ld give him4 ,he wrote3 8,x seem$ to me at *ur* to-day1 t ! ,communion ,s]vice1 z x is n[ & "h celebrat$1 is a docum5t ( ! dullness ( ! race4 ,h[ ^!1 my good neighbors1 ! b5d+ deacons1 ) _! cups & plates1 w\ld h /raight5$ !mselves to /urd9ess1 if ! proposition came be=e !m to honor ?us a fell[-man02 see ,cabot's ,memoir1 #cad4 ,yet ,dr4 ,leon>d ,bacon said ( ! ,unit>ians t 8x seem$ z if _! exclusive contemplation ( ,jesus ,*ri/ 9 8 human "* z ! example = our imitation _h wr\ght 9 !m an exceptional beauty & ,*ri/lik5ess ( liv+40 ,*adwick1 ,old & ,new ,unit>ian ,belief1 #bj1 speaks ( ,arianism z exalt+ ,*ri/ to a degree ( inappreciable diff]5ce f ,god1 :ile ,soc9us look$ ^u him only z a miracul\sly end[$ man1 & believ$ 9 an infallible book4 ,! t]m 8,unit>ians10 he claims1 is d]iv$ f ! 8,uniti10 a society 9 ,transylvania1 9 support ( mutual tol]ation betwe5 ,calv9i/s1 ,romani/s1 & ,soc9ians4 ,! "n /uck to ! advocates ( ! div9e ,unity1 because !y 7 its mo/ active memb]s4 ,b4 ,w4 ,lockh>t3 8,tr9ity gu>antees ,god's kn[abl5ess4 ,arius taught t ,jesus 0 nei!r human nor div9e1 b creat$ 9 "s grade ( be+ betwe5 ! two1 ess5tially unkn[n to man4 ,an abs5tee ,god made ,jesus 8 mess5g]1 ,god himself n t\*+ ! _w directly at any po9t1 & unkn[n & unkn[able to x4 ,a?anasius on ! contr>y ass]t$ t ,god did n s5d a mess5g] 9 ,*ri/1 b came himself1 s t to "k ,*ri/ is really to "k ,god :o is ess5tially reveal$ 9 him4 ,?is gave ! ,*ur* ! doctr9e ( ,god imman5t1 or ,immanuel1 ,god kn[able & actually kn[n by m51 because actually pres5t40 ,*apman1 ,jesus ,*ri/ & ! ,pres5t ,age1 #ad--8,! _w 0 nev] fur!r f ,unit>ianism ?an x is to-day2 we may add t ,unit>ianism 0 nev] fur!r f itself40 ,on ! doctr9es ( ! e>ly ,soc9ians1 see ,pr9ceton ,essays1 #a3aie4 ,on ! :ole subject1 see ,blunt1 ,dict4 ( ,h]etical ,sects1 art43 ,arius2 ,gu]icke1 ,hi/4 ,doctr9e1 #a3cac1 #cai4 ,see also a fur!r acc\nt ( ,arianism 9 ! *apt] ( ?is ,comp5dium on ! ,p]son ( ,*ri/4 ,,iv4 ,?is ,trip]sonality is n ,tri!ism2 =1 :ile !re are ?ree ,p]sons1 !re is b "o ,ess5ce4 7a7 ,! t]m 8p]son0 only approximately repres5ts ! tru?4 ,al?\gh ?is ^w1 m ne>ly ?an any o!r s+le ^w1 expresses ! conception :i* ! ,scriptures give u ( ! relation betwe5 ! ,fa!r1 ! ,son1 & ! ,holy ,_s1 x is n itself us$ 9 ?is connection 9 ,scripture1 & we employ x 9 a qualifi$ s5se1 n 9 ! ord9>y s5se 9 :i* we apply ! ^w 8p]son0 to ,pet]1 ,paul1 & ,john4 ,! ^w 8p]son0 is only ! imp]fect & inadequate expression ( a fact t transc5ds our exp]i5ce & compreh5sion4 ,bunyan3 8,my d>k & cl\dy words1 !y d b hold ,! tru?1 z cab9ets encase ! gold40 ,?ree ,gods1 limit+ ea* o!r1 w\ld deprive ea* o!r ( ,deity4 ,:ile we %[ t ! unity is articulat$ by ! p]sons1 x is equally important to rememb] t ! p]sons are limit$ by ! unity4 ,) u p]sonality implies entire sep>ation f all o!rs--di/9ct individuality4 ,b 9 ! "o ,god !re c be no su* sep>ation4 ,! p]sonal di/9ctions 9 him mu/ be su* z are consi/5t ) ess5tial unity4 ,?is is ! m]it ( ! /atem5t 9 ! ,symbolum ,quicumque 7or ,a?anasian ,cre$1 wrongly s call$73 8,! ,fa!r is ,god1 ! ,son is ,god1 ! ,holy ,gho/ is ,god2 & yet !re are n ?ree ,gods b "o ,god4 ,s likewise ! ,fa!r is ,"l1 ! ,son is ,"l1 ! ,holy ,gho/ is ,"l2 yet !re are n ?ree ,lords b "o ,"l4 ,= z we are compell$ by ,*ri/ian tru? to ackn[l$ge ea* p]son by himself to be ,god & ,"l1 s we are =bidd5 by ! same tru? to say t !re are ?ree ,gods or ?ree ,lords40 ,see ,hag5ba*1 ,hi/ory ( ,doctr9e1 #a3bgj4 ,we add t ! p]sonality ( ! ,godhead z a :ole is sep>ate & di/9ct f all o!rs1 & 9 ?is respect is m fully analog\s to man's p]sonality ?an is ! p]sonality ( ! ,fa!r or ( ! ,son4 ,! *ur* ( ,alex&ria 9 ! second c5tury *ant$ toge!r3 8,"o only is holy1 ! ,fa!r2 ,"o only is holy1 ! ,son2 ,"o only is holy1 ! ,_s40 ,mob]ly1 ,atonem5t & ,p]sonality1 #aed1 #afg1 #afh--8,! ?ree p]sons are nei!r ?ree ,gods1 nor ?ree p>ts ( ,god4 ,r are !y ,god ?reefoldly1 tri-p]sonally4444 ,! p]sonal di/9ction 9 ,godhead is a di/9ction )91 & (1 ,unity3 n a di/9ction :i* qualifies ,unity1 or usurps ! place ( x1 or de/roys x4 ,x is n a relation ( mutual exclusiv5ess1 b ( mutual inclusiv5ess4 ,no "o p]son is or c be )\t ! o!rs4444 ,! p]sonality ( ! supreme or absolute ,be+ _c be )\t self-conta9$ mutuality ( relations su* z ,w & ,love4 ,b ! mutuality w\ld n be real1 unless ! subject :i* becomes object1 & ! object :i* becomes subject1 7 on ea* side alike & equally ,p]sonal4444 ,! ,unity ( all-compreh5d+ inclusiv5ess is a high] mode ( unity ?an ! unity ( s+ul> di/9ctiv5ess4444 ,! disciples are n to h ! pres5ce ( ! ,_s in/ead ( ! ,son1 b to h ! ,_s is to h ! ,son4 ,we mean by ! ,p]sonal ,god n a limit$ alt]native to unlimit$ ab/racts1 su* z ,law1 ,hol9ess1 ,love1 b ! transc5d5t & inclusive complet5ess ( !m all4 ,! t]ms ,fa!r & ,son are c]ta9ly t]ms :i* rise m imm$iately out ( ! temporal facts ( ! inc>nation ?an out ( ! et]nal relations ( ! div9e ,be+4 ,!y are metaphors1 h[ev]1 :i* mean f> m 9 ! spiritual ?an !y d 9 ! mat]ial sph]e4 ,spiritual hung] is m int5se ?an physical hung]4 ,s s91 judgm5t1 grace1 are metaphors4 ,b 9 ,john #a3a-ah #8,son' is n us$1 b #8,^w4' 0 7b7 ,! necess>y qualification is t1 :ile ?ree p]sons among m5 h only a specific unity ( nature or ess5ce--t is1 h ! same species ( nature or ess5ce1--! p]sons ( ! ,godhead h a num]ical unity ( nature or ess5ce--t is1 h ! same nature or ess5ce4 ,! undivid$ ess5ce ( ! ,godhead belongs equally to ea* ( ! p]sons2 ,fa!r1 ,son1 & ,holy ,_s1 ea* possesses all ! sub/ance & all ! attributes ( ,deity4 ,! plurality ( ! ,godhead is !re=e n a plurality ( ess5ce1 b a plurality ( hypo/atical1 or p]sonal1 di/9ctions4 ,god is n ?ree & "o1 b ?ree 9 "o4 ,! "o indivisible ess5ce has ?ree modes ( subsi/5ce4 ,! ,tr9ity is n simply a p>tn]%ip1 9 :i* ea* memb] c sign ! "n ( ! firm2 = ?is is unity ( c\ncil & op]ation only1 n ( ess5ce4 ,god's nature is n an ab/ract b an organic unity4 ,god1 z liv+1 _c be a m]e ,monad4 ,tr9ity is ! organism ( ! ,deity4 ,! "o div9e ,be+ exi/s 9 ?ree modes4 ,! life ( ! v9e makes itself kn[n 9 ! life ( ! bran*es1 & ?is union betwe5 v9e & bran*es ,*ri/ uses to illu/rate ! union betwe5 ! ,fa!r & himself4 7,see ,john #ae3aj--8;,if ye keep my comm&m5ts1 ye %all abide 9 my love2 ev5 z ,i h kept my ,fa!r's comm&m5ts1 & abide 9 8 love02 cf4 v]se #e--8;,i am ! v9e1 ye are ! bran*es2 he t abide? 9 me1 & ,i 9 him1 ! same be>e? mu* fruit02 #ag3bb1 #bc--8,t !y may be "o1 ev5 z we are "o2 ,i 9 !m1 & ?\ 9 me407 ,s1 9 ! organism ( ! body1 ! arm has its own life1 a diff]5t life f t ( ! head or ! foot1 yet has ?is only by p>tak+ ( ! life ( ! :ole4 ,see ,dorn]1 ,sy/em ( ,doctr9e1 #a3dej-dec--8,! "o div9e p]sonality is s pres5t 9 ea* ( ! di/9ctions1 t ^!1 :i* s+ly & by !mselves w\ld n be p]sonal1 yet d p>ticipate 9 ! "o div9e p]sonality1 ea* 9 its own mann]4 ,?is "o div9e p]sonality is ! unity ( ! ?ree modes ( subsi/5ce :i* p>ticipate 9 itself4 ,nei!r is p]sonal )\t ! o!rs4 ,9 ea*1 9 its mann]1 is ! :ole ,godhead40 ,! human body is a complex r ?an a simple organism1 a unity :i* embraces an indef9ite numb] ( subsidi>y & dep5d5t organisms4 ,! "o life ( ! body manife/s itself 9 ! life ( ! n]v\s sy/em1 ! life ( ! circulatory sy/em1 & ! life ( ! dige/ive sy/em4 ,! complete de/ruction ( ei!r "o ( ^! sy/ems de/roys ! o!r two4 ,psy*ology z well z physiology reveals to u ! possibility ( a ?ree-fold life )9 ! b\nds ( a s+le be+4 ,9 ! individual man !re is sometimes a d\ble & ev5 a triple consci\sness4 ,h]b]t ,sp5c]1 ,autobiography1 #a3dei2 #b3bjd--8,mo/ active m9ds h1 ,i presume1 m or less frequ5t exp]i5ces ( d\ble consci\sness--"o consci\sness seem+ to take note ( :at ! o!r is ab\t1 & to applaud or blame40 ,he m5tions an in/ance 9 8 own exp]i5ce4 8,may !re n be possible a bi-c]ebral ?9k+1 z !re is a b9ocul> vision8444 ,9 ^! cases x seems z ?\gh !re 7 go+ on1 q ap>t f ! consci\sness :i* seem$ to con/itute myself1 "s process ( elaborat+ coh]5t ?\ghts--z ?\gh "o "p ( myself 0 an indep5d5t orig9ator ov] ^: say+s & do+s ,i _h no control1 & :i* 7 nev]!less 9 great measure consi/5t2 :ile ! o!r "p ( myself 0 a passive spectator or li/5]1 q unprep>$ = _m ( ! ?+s t ! fir/ "p said1 & :i* 7 nev]!less1 ?\gh unexpect$1 n illogical40 ,?is fact t !re c be m ?an "o consci\sness 9 ! same p]sonality among m5 %\ld make u sl[ to d5y t !re c be ?ree consci\snesses 9 ! "o ,god4 ,humanity at l>ge is also an organism1 & ?is fact l5ds new confirmation to ! ,paul9e /atem5t ( organic int]dep5d5ce4 ,mod]n sociology is ! doctr9e ( "o life con/itut$ by ! union ( _m4 8,unus homo1 nullus homo0 is a pr9ciple ( e?ics z well z ( sociology4 ,no man c h a consci5ce to himself4 ,! moral life ( "o results f & is int]p5etrat$ by ! moral life ( all4 ,all m5 moreov] live1 move & h _! be+ 9 ,god4 ,)9 ! b\nds ( ! "o univ]sal & div9e consci\sness !re are multitud9\s f9ite consci\snesses4 ,:y !n %\ld x be ?\ght incr$ible t 9 ! nature ( ?is "o ,god !re %\ld be ?ree inf9ite consci\snesses8 ,baldw91 ,psy*ology1 #ec1 #ed--8,! integration ( f9ite consci\snesses 9 an all-embrac+ div9e consci\sness may f9d a valid analogy 9 ! integration ( subord9ate consci\snesses 9 ! unit-p]sonality ( man4 ,9 ! hypnotic /ate1 multiple consci\snesses may be induc$ 9 ! same n]v\s organism4 ,9 insanity !re is a second>y consci\sness at w> ) t :i* normally dom9ates40 ,s*urman1 ,belief 9 ,god1 #bf1 #afa--8,! inf9ite ,_s may include ! f9ite1 z ! idea ( a s+le organism embraces )9 a s+le life a plurality ( memb]s & functions4444 ,all s\ls are p>ts or functions ( ! et]nal life ( ,god1 :o is above all1 & ?r\gh all1 & 9 all1 & 9 :om we live1 & move1 & h our be+40 ,we w\ld draw ! conclusion t1 z 9 ! body & s\l ( man1 bo? z an individual & z a race1 !re is div]sity 9 unity1 s 9 ! ,god 9 ^: image man is made1 !re is div]sity 9 unity1 & a triple consci\sness & w are consi/5t )1 & ev5 f9d _! p]fection 91 a s+le ess5ce4 ,by ! p]sonality ( ,god we mean m ?an we mean :5 we speak ( ! p]sonality ( ! ,son & ! p]sonality ( ! ,_s4 ,! p]sonality ( ! ,godhead is di/9ct & sep>ate f all o!rs1 & is1 9 ?is respect1 l t ( man4 ,h5ce ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3aid1 says 8x is pref]able to speak ( ! p]sonality ( ! ess5ce r ?an ( ! p]son ( ! ess5ce2 because ! ess5ce is n "o p]son1 b ?ree p]sons4444 ,! div9e ess5ce _c be at once ?ree p]sons & "o p]son1 if #8p]son' is employ$ 9 "o signification2 b x c be at once ?ree p]sons & "o p]sonal ,be+40 ,:ile we speak ( ! "o ,god z hav+ a p]sonality 9 :i* !re are ?ree p]sons1 we w\ld n call ?is p]sonality a sup]p]sonality1 if ?is latt] t]m is int5d$ to intimate t ,god's p]sonality is less ?an ! p]sonality ( man4 ,! p]sonality ( ! ,godhead is inclusive r ?an exclusive4 ,) ?is qualification we may ass5t to ! words ( ,d',arcy1 ,idealism & ,!ology1 #ic1 #id1 #bah1 #bcj1 #bcf1 #bed--8,! inn]mo/ tru? ( ?+s1 ,god1 mu/ be conceiv$ z p]sonal2 b ! ultimate ,unity1 :i* is 81 mu/ be believ$ to be sup]p]sonal4 ,x is a unity ( p]sons1 n a p]sonal unity4 ,= u p]sonality is ! ultimate =m ( unity4 ,x is n s 9 him4 ,= 9 him all p]sons live & move & h _! be+4444 ,god is p]sonal & also sup]p]sonal4 ,9 him !re is a transc5d5t unity t c embrace a p]sonal multiplicity4444 ,!re is 9 ,god an ultimate sup]p]sonal unity 9 :i* all p]sons are "o--all human p]sons & ! ?ree div9e p]sons4444 ,sub/ance is m real ?an quality1 & subject is m real ?an sub/ance4 ,! mo/ real ( all is ! concrete totality1 ! all-inclusive ,univ]sal4444 ,:at human love /rives to accompli%--! ov]com+ ( ! opposition ( p]son to p]son--is p]fectly atta9$ 9 ! div9e ,unity4444 ,! presupposition on :i* philosophy is driv5 back--t p]sons h an und]ly+ gr\nd ( unity is id5tical ) t :i* und]lies ,*ri/ian !ology40 ,see ,pfleid]] & ,lotze on p]sonality1 9 ?is ,comp5dium1 p4 #ajd4 7c7 ,?is on5ess ( ess5ce expla9s ! fact t1 :ile ,fa!r1 ,son1 & ,holy ,_s1 z respects _! p]sonality1 are di/9ct subsi/5ces1 !re is an int]communion ( p]sons & an imman5ce ( "o div9e p]son 9 ano!r :i* p]mits ! peculi> "w ( "o to be ascrib$1 ) a s+le limitation1 to ei!r ( ! o!rs1 & ! manife/ation ( "o to be recogniz$ 9 ! manife/ation ( ano!r4 ,! limitation is simply ?is1 t al?\gh ! ,son 0 s5t by ! ,fa!r1 & ! ,_s by ! ,fa!r & ! ,son1 x _c be said vice v]sa t ! ,fa!r is s5t ei!r by ! ,son1 or by ! ,_s4 ,! ,scripture repres5tations ( ?is int]communion prev5t u f conceiv+ ( ! di/9ctions call$ ,fa!r1 ,son1 & ,holy ,_s z involv+ sep>ation betwe5 !m4 ,dorn] adds t 89 "o is ea* ( ! o!rs40 ,?is is true ) ! limitation m5tion$ 9 ! text above4 ,:atev] ,*ri/ does1 ,god ! ,fa!r c be said to d2 = ,god acts only 9 & ?r\gh ,*ri/ ! ,reveal]4 ,:atev] ! ,holy ,_s does1 ,*ri/ c be said to d2 = ! ,holy ,_s is ! ,_s ( ,*ri/4 ,! ,_s is ! omnipres5t ,jesus1 & ,b5gel's dictum is true3 8,ubi ,spiritus1 ibi ,*ri/us40 ,passages illu/rat+ ?is int]communion are ! foll[+3 ,g54 #a3a--8;,god creat$02 cf4 ,heb4 #a3b--8?r\gh :om ! ,son also he made ! worlds02 ,john #e3ag1 #ai--8,my ,fa!r worke? ev5 until n[1 & ,i "w4444 ,! ,son c d no?+ ( himself1 b :at he see? ! ,fa!r do+2 = :at ?+s soev] he doe?1 ^! ! ,son also doe? 9 l mann]02 #ad3i--8;he t ha? se5 me ha? se5 ! ,fa!r02 #aa--8;,i am 9 ! ,fa!r & ! ,fa!r 9 me02 #ah--8;,i w n leave y desolate3 ,i come unto y0 7by ! ,holy ,_s72 #ae3bf--8:5 ! ,com=t] is come1 :om ,i w s5d unto y f ! ,fa!r1 ev5 ! ,_s ( tru?02 #ag3ba--8t !y may all be "o2 ev5 z ?\1 ,fa!r1 art 9 me1 & ,i 9 !e02 #b ,cor4 #e3ai--8;,god 0 9 ,*ri/ reconcil+02 ,titus #b3aj--8;,god our ,savior02 ,heb4 #ab3bc--8;,god ! ,judge ( all02 cf4 ,john #e3bb--8nei!r do? ! fa!r judge any man1 b he ha? giv5 all judgm5t unto ! ,son02 ,acts #ag3ca--8;judge ! _w 9 righte\sness by ! man :om he ha? orda9$40 ,x is ?is int]communion1 toge!r ) ! ord] ( p]sonality & op]ation to be m5tion$ h]eaft]1 :i* expla9s ! occasional use ( ! t]m 8,fa!r0 = ! :ole ,godhead2 z 9 ,eph4 #d3f--8"o ,god & ,fa!r ( all1 :o is ov] all ?r\gh all 9 ,*ri/1 & 9 y all0 by ! ,_s4 ,?is int]communion also expla9s ! designation ( ,*ri/ z 8! ,_s10 & ( ! ,_s z 8! ,_s ( ,*ri/10 z 9 #a ,cor4 #ae3de--8! la/ ,adam became a life-giv+ ,_s02 #b ,cor4 #c3ag--8,n[ ! ,"l is ! ,_s02 ,gal4 #d3f--8s5t =? ! ,_s ( 8 ,son02 ,phil4 #a3ai--8supply ( ! ,_s ( ,jesus ,*ri/0 7see ,al=d & ,lange on #b ,cor4 #c3ag1 #ah74 ,s ! ,lamb1 9 ,rev4 #e3f1 has 8sev5 horns & sev5 eyes1 :i* are ! sev5 ,spirits ( ,god1 s5t =? into all ! e>?0 ! ,holy ,_s1 ) 8 manifold p[]s1 is ! ,_s ( ! omnipot5t1 omnisci5t1 & omnipres5t ,*ri/4 ,!ologians h designat$ ?is int]communion by ! t]ms 1 circum9cessio1 int]communicatio1 circulatio1 inexi/5tia4 ,! ^w 0 us$ to d5ote ess5ce1 sub/ance1 nature1 be+2 & ! words & = p]son1 di/9ction1 mode ( subsi/5ce4 ,on ! *ang+ uses ( ! words & see ,dorn]1 ,glaub5slehre1 #b3cba1 note #b4 ,on ! mean+ ( ! ^w 'p]son' 9 connection ) ! ,tr9ity1 see ,john ,h[e1 ,calm ,disc\rse ( ! ,tr9ity2 ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 ,obs]vations on ! ,tr9ity2 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3aid1 #bfg-bge1 #bii1 #cjj4 ,! ,holy ,_s is ,*ri/'s alt] ego1 or o!r self4 ,:5 ,jesus w5t away1 x 0 an ex*ange ( 8 pres5ce = 8 omnipres5ce2 an ex*ange ( limit$ = unlimit$ p[]2 an ex*ange ( companion%ip = indwell+4 ,s9ce ,*ri/ comes to m5 9 ! ,holy ,_s1 he speaks ?r\gh ! apo/les z au?oritatively z if 8 own lips utt]$ ! words4 ,ea* believ]1 9 hav+ ! ,holy ,_s1 has ! :ole ,*ri/ = 8 own2 see ,a4 ,j4 ,gordon1 ,m9i/ry ( ! ,_s4 ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #bah--8,! p]sons ( ! ,holy ,tr9ity are n sep>able individuals4 ,ea* involves ! o!rs2 ! com+ ( ea* is ! com+ ( ! o!rs4 ,?us ! com+ ( ! ,_s mu/ h involv$ ! com+ ( ! ,son4 ,b ! specialty ( ! ,p5teco/al gift appe>s to be ! com+ ( ! ,holy ,_s out ( ! uplift$ & glorifi$ manhood ( ! inc>nate ,son4 ,! ,_s is ! life-giv]1 b ! life ) :i* he works 9 ! *ur* is ! life ( ! ,inc>nate1 ! life ( ,jesus40 ,mob]ly1 ,atonem5t & ,p]sonality1 #he--8;,= c5turies ^u c5turies1 ! ess5tial unity ( ,god _h be5 burnt & br&$ 9 ^u ! consci\sness ( ,israel4 ,x _h to be completely e/abli%$ fir/1 z a basal elem5t ( ?\ght1 indisp5sable1 unalt]able1 be=e !re c\ld beg9 ! disclosure to man ( ! reality ( ! et]nal relations )9 ! "o indivisible be+ ( ,god4 ,& :5 ! disclosure came1 x came n z modify+1 b z fur!r int]pret+ & illum9+1 t unity :i* x absolutely presuppos$40 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #bch--8,!re is extreme difficulty 9 giv+ any /atem5t ( a triunity t %all n v]ge ^u tri!ism on ! "o h&1 or ^u m]e modalism on ! o!r4 ,x 0 v natural t ,calv9 %\ld be *>g$ ) ,sabellianism1 & ,john ,h[e ) tri!ism40 ,v4 ,! ,?ree ,p]sons1 ,fa!r1 ,son1 & ,holy ,_s1 are equal4 ,9 explanation1 notice t3 #a4 ,^! titles belong to ! ,p]sons4 7a7 ,! ,fa!r is n ,god z su*2 = ,god is n only ,fa!r1 b also ,son & ,holy ,_s4 ,! t]m 8,fa!r0 designates t hypo/atical di/9ction 9 ! div9e nature 9 virtue ( :i* ,god is relat$ to ! ,son1 & ?r\gh ! ,son & ! ,_s to ! *ur* & ! _w4 ,z au?or ( ! believ]'s spiritual z well z natural life1 ,god is d\bly 8 ,fa!r2 b ?is relation :i* ,god su/a9s to creatures is n ! gr\nd ( ! title4 ,god is ,fa!r prim>ily 9 virtue ( ! relation :i* he su/a9s to ! et]nal ,son2 only z we are spiritually unit$ to ,jesus ,*ri/ d we become *ildr5 ( ,god4 7b7 ,! ,son is n ,god z su*2 = ,god is n only ,son1 b also ,fa!r & ,holy ,_s4 8,! ,son0 designates t di/9ction 9 virtue ( :i* ,god is relat$ to ! ,fa!r1 is s5t by ! ,fa!r to r$eem ! _w1 & ) ! ,fa!r s5ds ! ,holy ,_s4 7c7 ,! ,holy ,_s is n ,god z su*2 = ,god is n only ,holy ,_s1 b also ,fa!r & ,son4 8,! ,holy ,_s0 designates t di/9ction 9 virtue ( :i* ,god is relat$ to ! ,fa!r & ! ,son1 & is s5t by !m to accompli% ! "w ( r5ew+ ! ungodly & ( sanctify+ ! *ur*4 ,nei!r ( ^! names designates ! ,monad z su*4 ,ea* designates r t p]sonal di/9ction :i* =ms ! et]nal basis & gr\nd = a p>ticul> self-revelation4 ,9 ! s5se ( be+ ! ,au?or & ,provid] ( m5's natural life1 ,god is ! ,fa!r ( all4 ,b ev5 ?is natural son%ip is m$iat$ by ,jesus ,*ri/2 see #a ,cor4 #h3f--8"o ,"l1 ,jesus ,*ri/ ?r\gh :om are all ?+s1 & we ?r\gh him40 ,! phrase 8,our ,fa!r10 h[ev]1 c be us$ ) ! highe/ tru? only by ! reg5]ate1 :o h be5 newly born ( ,god by be+ unit$ to ,*ri/ ?r\gh ! p[] ( ! ,holy ,_s4 ,see ,gal4 #c3bf--8;,= ye are all sons ( ,god1 ?r\gh fai?1 9 ,jesus ,*ri/02 #d3d-f--8;,god s5t =? 8 ,son 444 t we might receive ! adoption ( sons 444 s5t =? ! ,_s ( 8 ,son into our he>ts1 cry+1 ,abba1 ,fa!r02 ,eph4 #a3e--8;=eorda9$ z unto adoption z sons ?r\gh ,jesus ,*ri/40 ,god's love = ,*ri/ is ! measure ( 8 love = ^? :o are "o ) ,*ri/4 ,human nature 9 ,*ri/ is lift$ up into ! life & communion ( ! et]nal ,tr9ity4 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3cjf-caj4 ,human fa!rhood is a reflection ( ! div9e1 n1 vice v]sa1 ! div9e a reflection ( ! human2 cf4 ,eph4 #c3ad1 #ae--8! ,fa!r1 f :om e fa!rhood 9 heav5 & on e>? is nam$40 ,*adwick1 ,unit>ianism1 #gg-hc1 makes ! "n 8,fa!r0 only a symbol = ! great ,cause ( organic evolution1 ! ,au?or ( all be+4 ,b we may reply ) ,/e>ns1 ,evid5ce ( ,*ri/ian ,exp]i5ce1 #agg--8to "k ,god outside ( ! sph]e ( r$emption is n to "k him 9 ! deep] mean+ ( ! t]m #8,fa!r'4 ,x is only ?r\gh ! ,son t we "k ! ,fa!r3 ,mat4 #aa3bg--#8,nei!r do? any "k ! ,fa!r1 save ! ,son1 & he to :omsoev] ! ,son wille? to reveal him4'0 ,:iton1 ,gloria ,patri1 #ch--8,! ,unse5 c be kn[n only by ! se5 :i* comes =? f x4 ,! all-g5]at+ or ,pat]nal ,life :i* is hidd5 f u c be kn[n only by ! g5]at$ or ,filial ,life 9 :i* x reveals itself4 ,! goodness & righte\sness :i* inhabits et]nity c be kn[n only by ! goodness & righte\sness :i* issues f x 9 ! successive bir?s ( "t4 ,god above ! _w is made kn[n only by ,god 9 ! _w4 ,god transc5d5t1 ! ,fa!r1 is reveal$ by ,god imman5t1 ! ,son40 ,fab]3 8,o m>vell\s1 ,o wor%ipful6 ,no song or s\nd is he>d1 ,b ev]y:]e & e h\r1 ,9 love1 9 wisdom & 9 p[]1 ! ,fa!r speaks 8 de> et]nal ,^w40 ,we may int]pret ?is z mean+ t self-expression is a necessity ( nature to an inf9ite ,m9d4 ,! ,^w is !re=e et]nal4 ,*ri/ is ! mirror f :i* are fla%$ ^u u ! rays ( ! hidd5 ,lum9>y4 ,s ,pr9cipal ,fairbairn says3 8,!ology mu/ be on its hi/orical side ,*ri/oc5tric1 b on its doctr9al side ,!oc5tric40 ,salmond1 ,expositor's ,greek ,te/am5t1 on ,eph4 #a3e--8;,by #8adoption' ,paul does n mean ! be/[al ( ! full privileges ( ! family on ^? :o are sons by nature1 b ! acceptance into ! family ( ^? :o are n sons orig9ally & by "r 9 ! relation prop] ( ^? :o are sons by bir?4 ,h5ce is nev] affirm$ ( ,*ri/1 = he alone is ,son ( ,god by nature4 ,s ,paul reg>ds our son%ip1 n z ly+ 9 ! natural relation 9 :i* m5 /& to ,god z 8 *ildr51 b z imply+ a new relation ( grace1 f\nd$ on a cov5ant relation ( ,god & on ! "w ( ,*ri/ 7,gal4 #d3e sq4740 #b4 ,qualifi$ s5se ( ^! titles4 ,l ! ^w 8p]son01 ! names ,fa!r1 ,son1 & ,holy ,_s are n to be conf9$ )9 ! precise limitations ( mean+ :i* w\ld be requir$ if !y 7 appli$ to m54 7a7 ,! ,scriptures enl>ge our conceptions ( ,*ri/'s ,son%ip by giv+ to him 9 8 prexi/5t /ate ! names ( ! ,logos1 ! ,image1 & ! ,effulg5ce ( ,god4--,! t]m 8,logos0 comb9es 9 itself ! two ideas ( ?\ght & ^w1 ( reason & expression4 ,:ile ! ,logos z div9e ?\ght or reason is "o ) ,god1 ! ,logos z div9e ^w or expression is di/+ui%able f ,god4 ,words are ! means by :i* p]sonal be+s express or reveal !mselves4 ,s9ce ,jesus ,*ri/ 0 8! ,^w0 be=e !re 7 any creatures to :om revelations c\ld be made1 x w\ld seem to be only a necess>y inf]5ce f ?is title t 9 ,*ri/ ,god mu/ be f et]nity express$ or reveal$ to himself2 9 o!r words1 t ! ,logos is ! pr9ciple ( tru?1 or self-consci\sness1 9 ,god4--,! t]m 8,image0 sugge/s ! ideas ( copy or c\nt]p>t4 ,man is ! image ( ,god only relatively & d]ivatively4 ,*ri/ is ! ,image ( ,god absolutely & ar*etypally4 ,z ! p]fect repres5tation ( ! ,fa!r's p]fections1 ! ,son w\ld seem to be ! object & pr9ciple ( love 9 ! ,godhead4--,! t]m 8,effulg5ce10 f9ally1 is an allusion to ! sun & its radiance4 ,z ! effulg5ce ( ! sun manife/s ! sun's nature1 :i* o!rwise w\ld be unreveal$1 yet is insep>able f ! sun & ev] "o ) x1 s ,*ri/ reveals ,god1 b is et]nally "o ) ,god4 ,"h is a pr9ciple ( movem5t1 ( w1 :i* seems to connect itself ) ! hol9ess1 or self-ass]t+ purity1 ( ! div9e nature4 ,smy?1 ,introd4 to ,edw>ds' ,obs]vations on ! ,tr9ity3 8,! ontological relations ( ! p]sons ( ! ,tr9ity are n a m]e blank to human ?\ght40 ,john #a3a--8;,9 ! beg9n+ 0 ! ,^w0--means m ?an 89 ! beg9n+ 0 ! x1 or ! z]o40 ,godet inde$ says t ,logos 8reason0 only 9 philosophical writ+s1 b nev] 9 ! ,scriptures4 ,he calls ?is a ,hegelian notion4 ,b bo? ,plato & ,philo _h made ?is signification a common "o4 ,on z reason spee*1 see ,lightfoot on ,colossians1 #adc1 #add4 ,mey] int]prets x z 8p]sonal subsi/5ce1 ! self-revelation ( ! div9e ess5ce1 be=e all "t imman5t 9 ,god40 ,ne&]1 ,plant+ & ,tra9+1 #cfi--,logos 8! et]nal ,reveal] ( ! div9e ess5ce40 ,bu%nell3 8,mirror ( creative imag9ation02 8=m ( ,god40 ,^w #a4 ,expression2 #b4 ,def9ite expression2 #c4 ,ord]$ expression2 #d4 ,complete expression4 ,we make ?\ght def9ite by putt+ x into language4 ,s ,god's weal? ( ideas is 9 ! ,^w =m$ into an ord]$ ,k+dom1 a true ,cosmos2 see ,mason1 ,fai? ( ! ,gospel1 #gf4 ,max ,mll]3 8,a ^w is simply a spok5 ?\ght made audible z s\nd4 ,take away f a ^w ! s\nd1 & :at is left is simply ! ?\ght ( x40 ,:iton1 ,gloria ,patri1 #gb1 #gc--8,! ,greek saw 9 ! ^w ! abid+ ?\ght beh9d ! pass+ =m4 ,! ,^w 0 ,god & yet f9ite--f9ite only z to =m1 inf9ite z to :at ! =m sugge/s or expresses4 ,by ,^w "s =m mu/ be meant1 & any =m is f9ite4 ,! ,^w is ! =m tak5 by ! inf9ite ,intellig5ce :i* transc5ds all =ms40 ,we reg>d ?is id5tification ( ! ,^w ) ! f9ite manife/ation ( ! ,^w z contradict$ by ,john #a3a1 :]e ! ,^w is repres5t$ z be+ ) ,god be=e creation1 & by ,phil4 #b3f1 :]e ! ,^w is repres5t$ z exi/+ 9 ! =m ( ,god be=e 8 self-limitation 9 human nature4 ,scripture requires u to believe 9 an objectification ( ,god to himself 9 ! p]son ( ! ,^w prior to any f9ite manife/ation ( ,god to m54 ,*ri/ exi/$ z ! ,^w1 & ! ,^w 0 ) ,god1 be=e ! ,^w 0 made fle% & be=e ! _w came into be+2 9 o!r words1 ! ,logos 0 ! et]nal pr9ciple ( tru? or self-consci\sness 9 ! nature ( ,god4 ,passages repres5t+ ,*ri/ z ! ,image ( ,god are ,col4 #a3ae--8:o is ! image ( ! invisible ,god02 #b ,cor4 #d3d--8;,*ri/1 :o is ! image ( ,god0 772 ,heb4 #a3c--8! v image ( 8 sub/ance0 7 72 "h means 8impress10 8c\nt]p>t40 ,*ri/ is ! p]fect image ( ,god1 z m5 are n4 ,he !re=e has consci\sness & w4 ,he possesses all ! attributes & p[]s ( ,god4 ,! ^w 8,image0 sugge/s ! p]fect equality ) ,god :i* ! title 8,son0 might at fir/ seem to d5y4 ,! liv+ ,image ( ,god :i* is equal to himself & is ! object ( 8 inf9ite love c be no?+ less ?an p]sonal4 ,z ! ba*elor c nev] satisfy 8 long+ = companion%ip by l9+ 8 room ) mirrors :i* furni% only a lifeless reflection ( himself1 s ,god requires = 8 love a p]sonal z well z an inf9ite object4 ,! ,image is n precisely ! repetition ( ! orig9al4 ,! /amp f ! seal is n precisely ! reproduction ( ! seal4 ,! lett]s on ! seal run backw>ds & c be easily read only :5 ! impression is be=e u4 ,s ,*ri/ is ! only int]pretation & revelation ( ! hidd5 ,godhead4 ,z only 9 love d we come to "k ! dep?s ( our own be+1 s x is only 9 ! ,son t 8,god is love0 7#a ,john #d3h74 ,*ri/ is spok5 ( z ! ,effulg5ce ( ,god 9 ,heb4 #a3c--8:o be+ ! effulg5ce ( 8 glory0 7 72 cf4 #b ,cor4 #d3f--8%9$ 9 our he>ts1 to give ! light ( ! k ( ! glory ( ,god 9 ! face ( ,jesus ,*ri/40 ,notice t ! radiance ( ! sun is z old z ! sun itself1 & )\t x ! sun w\ld n be sun4 ,s ,*ri/ is coqual & cot]nal ) ! ,fa!r4 ,ps4 #hd3aa--8;,jehovah ,god is a sun40 ,b we _c see ! sun except by ! sunlight4 ,*ri/ is ! sunlight :i* /reams =? f ! ,sun & :i* makes ! ,sun visible4 ,if !re be an et]nal ,sun1 !re mu/ be also an et]nal ,sunlight1 & ,*ri/ mu/ be et]nal4 ,we/cott on ,hebrews #a3c--8,! use ( ! absolute timeless t]m 1 #8be+'1 gu>ds aga9/ ! ?\ght t ! ,"l's son%ip 0 by adoption1 & n by nature4 does n express p]sonality1 & does n express coss5tiality4 ,! two words are relat$ exactly z & 1 & l ^? mu/ be comb9$ to give ! fulness ( ! tru?4 ,! tru? express$ ?us anti!tically holds good absolutely4444 ,9 ,*ri/ ! ess5ce ( ,god is made di/9ct2 9 ,*ri/ ! revelation ( ,god's "* is se540 ,on ,edw>ds's view ( ! ,tr9ity1 toge!r ) 8 quotations f ,ramsey's ,philosophical ,pr9ciples1 f :i* he seems to h d]iv$ important sugge/ions1 see ,all51 ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 #cch-cgf2 ,g4 ,p4 ,fi%]1 ,edw>ds's ,essay on ! ,tr9ity1 #aaj-aaf4 7b7 ,! names ?us giv5 to ! second p]son ( ! ,tr9ity1 if !y h any significance1 br+ him be=e our m9ds 9 ! g5]al aspect ( ,reveal]1 & sugge/ a relation ( ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity to ,god's imman5t attributes ( tru?1 love1 & hol9ess4 ,! prepositions us$ to describe ! int]nal relations ( ! second p]son to ! fir/ are n prepositions ( re/1 b prepositions ( direction & movem5t4 ,! ,tr9ity1 z ! organism ( ,deity1 secures a life-movem5t ( ! ,godhead1 a process 9 :i* ,god ev]more objectifies himself & 9 ! ,son gives =? ( 8 fulness4 ,*ri/ repres5ts ! c5trifugal action ( ! deity4 ,b !re mu/ be c5tripetal action also4 ,9 ! ,holy ,_s ! movem5t is complet$1 & ! div9e activity & ?\ght returns into itself4 ,true religion1 9 reunit+ u to ,god1 reproduces 9 u1 9 our limit$ measure1 ?is et]nal process ( ! div9e m9d4 ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce witnesses t ,god 9 himself is unkn[n2 ,*ri/ is ! organ ( ext]nal revelation2 ! ,holy ,_s is ! organ ( int]nal revelation--only he c give u an inw>d appreh5sion or realization ( ! tru?4 ,x is 8?r\gh ! et]nal ,_s0 t ,*ri/ 8(f]$ himself )\t blemi% unto ,god10 & x is only ?r\gh ! ,holy ,_s t ! *ur* has access to ! ,fa!r1 or fall5 creatures c return to ,god4 ,"h we see t ,god is ,life1 self-suffici5t ,life1 ,inf9ite ,life1 ( :i* ! life ( ! univ]se is b a fa9t reflection1 a rill f ! f\nta91 a drop f ! ocean4 ,s9ce ,*ri/ is ! only ,reveal]1 ! only outgo+ pr9ciple 9 ! ,godhead1 x is he 9 :om ! :ole creation comes to be & holds toge!r4 ,he is ! ,life ( nature3 all natural beauty & gr&eur1 all =ces molecul> & mol>1 all laws ( gravitation & evolution1 are ! "w & manife/ation ( ! omnipres5t ,*ri/4 ,he is ! ,life ( humanity3 ! intellectual & moral impulses ( man1 s f> z !y are normal & uplift+1 are due to ,*ri/2 he is ! pr9ciple ( progress & improvem5t 9 hi/ory4 ,he is ! ,life ( ! *ur*3 ! "o & only ,r$eem] & spiritual ,head ( ! race is also its ,tea*] & ,"l4 ,all objective revelation ( ,god is ! "w ( ,*ri/4 ,b all subjective manife/ation ( ,god is ! "w ( ! ,holy ,_s4 ,z ,*ri/ is ! pr9ciple ( outgo+1 s ! ,holy ,_s is ! pr9ciple ( return to ,god4 ,god w\ld take up f9ite creatures into himself1 w\ld brea? into !m 8 brea?1 w\ld tea* !m to laun* _! little boats ^u ! inf9ite curr5t ( 8 life4 ,our electric c>s c g up hill at great spe$ s long z !y grip ! cable4 ,fai? is ! grip :i* connects u ) ! mov+ en]gy ( ,god4 8,! univ]se is homew>d b\nd10 because ! ,holy ,_s is ev] turn+ objective revelation into subjective revelation1 & is lead+ m5 consci\sly or unconsci\sly to appropriate ! ?\ght & love & purpose ( ,him 9 :om all ?+s f9d _! object & end2 8= ( him & ?r\gh him1 & unto him1 are all ?+s0 7,rom4 #aa3cf71--;"h !re is allusion to ! ,fa!r z ! s\rce1 ! ,son z ! m$ium1 & ! ,_s z ! p]fect+ & complet+ ag5t1 9 ,god's op]ations4 ,b all ^! ext]nal processes are only signs & f9ite reflections ( a life-process int]nal to ! nature ( ,god4 ,mey] on ,john #a3a--8! ,^w 0 ) ,god03 8 does n 1 b expresses ! exi/5ce ( ! ,logos 9 ,god 9 respect ( int]c\rse4 ,! moral ess5ce ( ?is ess5tial fell[%ip is love1 :i* excludes any m]ely modali/ic conception40 ,m>cus ,dods1 ,expositor's ,greek ,te/am5t1 9 loco3 8,?is preposition implies int]c\rse & !re=e sep>ate p]sonality40 ,mason1 ,fai? ( ! ,gospel1 #fb--8;,& ! ,^w 0 t[>d ,god0 8 face is n outw>ds1 z if he 7 m]ely reveal+1 or wait+ to reveal1 ,god to ! creation4 ,8 face is turn$ inw>ds4 ,8 :ole ,p]son is direct$ t[>d ,god1 motion correspond+ to motion1 ?\ght to ?\ght4444 ,9 him ,god /&s reveal$ to himself4 ,contra/ ! attitude ( fall5 ,adam1 ) 8 face av]t$ f ,god4 ,godet1 on ,john #a3a--8 intimates n only p]sonality b movem5t4444 ,! t5d5cy ( ! ,logos ad extra re/s ^u an ant]ior & ess5tial relation ad intra4 ,to reveal ,god1 "o mu/ "k him2 to project him outw>dly1 "o mu/ h plung$ into 8 bosom40 ,comp>e ,john #a3ah--8! only begott5 ,son1 :o is 9 ! bosom ( ! ,fa!r0 7,r4 ,v47 :]e we f9d1 n 1 b 4 ,z means 8w5t into ! city & 0 !re10 s ! use ( ^! prepositions indicates 9 ! ,godhead movem5t z well z re/4 ,dorn]1 ,sy/em ( ,doctr9e1 #c3aic1 translates by 8h+ew&t zu10 or 8turn$ t[>d40 ,! preposition w\ld !n imply t ! ,reveal]1 :o exi/$ 9 ! beg9n+1 0 ev] ov] aga9/ ,god1 9 ! life-process ( ! ,tr9ity1 z ! p]fect objectification ( himself4 8,das ,aussi*selb/se9 kraft des ,dur*si*selb/se9 mit dem ,frsi*selb/se9 zusamm5s*lies/40 ,dorn] speaks ( 8das ,auss5si*od]9e9em&]nse92 ,si*gelt5dma*5 des ,ausges*loss552 ,si*ni*tsogesetz?ab52 ,/eh5bleib5woll540 ,!re is 9 all human intellig5ce a ?reefoldness :i* po9ts t[>d a tr9it>ian life 9 ,god4 ,we c di/+ui% a ,wiss51 a ,bewus/se91 a ,selb/bewus/e94 ,9 complete self-consci\sness !re are ! ?ree elem5ts3 #a4 ,we are ourselves2 #b4 ,we =m a picture ( ourselves2 #c4 ,we recognize ?is picture z ! picture ( ourselves4 ,! little *ild speaks ( himself 9 ! ?ird p]son3 8,baby did x40 ,! objective comes be=e ! subject2 8me0 comes fir/1 & 8,i0 is a lat] developm5t2 8himself0 /ill holds its place1 r ?an 8heself40 ,b ?is duality belongs only to undevelop$ intellig5ce2 x is *>act]i/ic ( ! animal creation2 we rev]t to x 9 our dreams2 ! insane are p]man5t victims ( x2 & s9ce s9 is moral insanity1 ! s9n] has no hope until1 l ! prodigal1 he 8comes to himself0 7,luke #ae3ag74 ,! insane p]son is m5te ali5atus1 & we call physicians = ! insane by ! "n ( ali5i/s4 ,m]e duality gives u only ! notion ( sep>ation4 ,p]fect self-consci\sness :e!r 9 man or 9 ,god requires a ?ird unify+ elem5t4 ,& 9 ,god m$iation betwe5 ! 8,i0 & ! 8,?\0 mu/ be ! "w ( a ,p]son also1 & ! ,p]son :o m$iates betwe5 ! two mu/ be 9 all respects ! equal ( ei!r1 or he c\ld n adequately int]pret ! "o to ! o!r2 see ,mason1 ,fai? ( ! ,gospel1 #eg-ei4 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3agi-ahi1 #bgf-bhc--8;,x is "o ( ! effects ( conviction by ! ,holy ,_s to conv]t consci\sness into self-consci\sness4444 ,conviction ( s9 is ! consci\sness ( self z ! guilty au?or ( s94 ,self-consci\sness is tr9al1 :ile m]e consci\sness is dual4444 ,"o & ! same human _s subsi/s 9 two modes or di/9ctions--subject & object 444 ,! ?ree hypo/atical consci\snesses 9 _! comb9ation & unity con/itute ! "o consci\sness ( ,god 444 z ! ?ree p]sons make "o ess5ce40 ,dorn] consid]s ! int]nal relations ( ! ,tr9ity 7,sy/em1 #a3dab sq47 9 ?ree aspects3 #a4 ,physical4 ,god is causa sui4 ,b effect t equals cause mu/ itself be causative4 ,"h w\ld be duality1 7 x n = a ?ird pr9ciple ( unity4 ,tr9itas dualitatem ad unitatem r$ucit4 #b4 ,logical4 ,self-consci\sness sets self ov] aga9/ self4 ,yet ! ?9k] mu/ n reg>d self z "o ( _m1 & call himself 8he10 z *ildr5 d2 = ! ?9k] w\ld !n be1 n self-consci\s1 b m5te ali5atus1 8beside himself40 ,he !re=e 8comes to himself0 9 a ?ird1 z ! brute _c4 #c4 ,e?ical4 ,god--self-will+ "r4 ,b "r bas$ on arbitr>y w is n "r4 ,"r bas$ on passive nature is n "r ei!r4 ,"r z be+--,fa!r4 ,"r z will+--,son4 ,)\t ! latt] pr9ciple ( fre$om1 we h a dead e?ic1 a dead ,god1 an en?ron$ necessity4 ,! unity ( necessity & fre$om is f\nd by ,god1 z by ! ,*ri/ian1 9 ! ,holy ,_s4 ,! ,fa!r--,i2 ! ,son--,me2 ! ,_s ! unity ( ! two2 see ,c4 ,c4 ,ev]ett1 ,essays1 ,!ological & ,lit]>y1 #cb4 ,!re mu/ be n only ,sun & ,sunlight1 b an ,eye to behold ! ,light4 ,william ,james1 9 8 ,psy*ology1 di/+ui%es ! ,me1 ! self z kn[n1 f ! ,i1 ! self z kn[]4 ,b we ne$ /ill fur!r to di/+ui% a ?ird pr9ciple1 a subject-object1 f bo? subject & object4 ,! subject _c recognize ! object z "o ) itself except ?r\gh a unify+ pr9ciple :i* c be di/+ui%$ f bo?4 ,we may !re=e reg>d ! ,holy ,_s z ! pr9ciple ( self-consci\sness 9 man z well z 9 ,god4 ,z !re 0 a natural union ( ,*ri/ ) humanity prior to 8 r$eem+ "w1 s !re is a natural union ( ! ,holy ,_s ) all m5 prior to 8 reg5]at+ "w3 ,job #cb3ah--8!re is a _s 9 man1 ,& ! brea? ( ! ,almighty give? !m und]/&+40 ,kuyp]1 ,"w ( ! ,holy ,_s1 tea*es t ! ,holy ,_s con/itutes ! pr9ciple ( life 9 all liv+ ?+s1 & animates all rational be+s1 z well z reg5]ates & sanctifies ! elect ( ,god4 ,ma!son1 ,voices ( ! ,_s1 #ge1 rem>ks on ,job #cd3ad1 #ae--8;,if he ga!r unto himself 8 ,_s & 8 brea?2 all fle% %all p]i% toge!r0--t ! ,_s is n only necess>y to man's salvation1 b also to keep up ev5 man's natural life4 ,ebr>d1 ,dogmatik1 #a3agb1 speaks ( ! ,son z ! c5trifugal1 :ile ! ,holy ,_s is ! c5tripetal movem5t ( ! ,godhead4 ,god ap>t f ,*ri/ is unreveal$ 7,john #a3ah--8,no man ha? se5 ,god at any "t072 ,*ri/ is ! organ ( ext]nal revelation 7#ah--8! only begott5 ,son1 :o is 9 ! bosom ( ! ,fa!r1 he ha? decl>$ him072 ! ,holy ,_s is ! organ ( int]nal revelation 7#a ,cor4 #b3aj--8unto u ,*ri/ reveal$ !m ?r\gh ! ,_s074 ,t ! ,holy ,_s is ! pr9ciple ( all movem5t t[>ds ,god appe>s f ,heb4 #i3ad--;,*ri/ 8?r\gh ! et]nal ,_s (f]$ himself )\t blemi% unto ,god02 ,eph4 #b3bh--8;access 9 "o ,_s unto ! ,fa!r02 ,rom4 #h3bf--8! ,_s also helpe? our infirmity 444 ! ,_s himself make? int]cession = u02 ,john #d3bd--8;,god is a ,_s3 & !y t wor%ip him mu/ wor%ip 9 _s02 #af3h-aa--8;convict ! _w 9 respect ( s91 & ( righte\sness1 & ( judgm5t40 ,see ,twe/51 ,dogmatik1 on ! ,tr9ity2 also ,?omasius1 ,*ri/i ,p]son und ,w]k1 #a3aaa4 ,mason1 ,fai? ( ! ,gospel1 #fh--8;,x is ! joy ( ! ,son to receive1 8 gladness to welcome mo/ ^? wi%es ( ! ,fa!r :i* w co/ mo/ to himself4 ,! ,_s also has 8 joy 9 mak+ kn[n1--9 p]fect+ fell[%ip & keep+ ! et]nal love alive by t incessant s\nd+ ( ! deeps :i* makes ! he>t ( ! ,fa!r kn[n to ! ,son1 & ! he>t ( ! ,son kn[n to ! ,fa!r40 ,we may add t ! ,holy ,_s is ! organ ( int]nal revelation ev5 to ! ,fa!r & to ! ,son4 7c7 ,9 ! light ( :at has be5 said1 we may und]/& some:at m fully ! *>act]i/ic diff]5ces betwe5 ! "w ( ,*ri/ & t ( ! ,holy ,_s4 ,we may sum !m up 9 ! f\r /atem5ts t1 fir/1 all outgo+ seems to be ! "w ( ,*ri/1 all return to ,god ! "w ( ! ,_s2 secondly1 ,*ri/ is ! organ ( ext]nal revelation1 ! ,holy ,_s ! organ ( int]nal revelation2 ?irdly1 ,*ri/ is our advocate 9 heav51 ! ,holy ,_s is our advocate 9 ! s\l2 f\r?ly1 9 ! "w ( ,*ri/ we are passive1 9 ! "w ( ! ,_s we are active4 ,( ! "w ( ,*ri/ we %all treat m fully h]eaft]1 9 speak+ ( 8 ,(fices z ,prophet1 ,prie/1 & ,k+4 ,! "w ( ! ,holy ,_s w be treat$ :5 we come to speak ( ! ,application ( ,r$emption 9 ,reg5]ation & ,sanctification4 ,"h x is suffici5t to say t ! ,holy ,_s is repres5t$ 9 ! ,scriptures z ! au?or ( life--9 creation1 9 ! conception ( ,*ri/1 9 reg5]ation1 9 resurrection2 & z ! giv] ( light--9 ! inspiration ( ,scripture writ]s1 9 ! conviction ( s9n]s1 9 ! illum9ation & sanctification ( ,*ri/ians4 ,g54 #a3b--8,! ,_s ( ,god 0 brood+02 ,luke #a3ce--to ,m>y3 8,! ,holy ,_s %all come ^u !e01 ,john #c3h--8;born ( ! ,_s02 ,ps4 #cg3i1 #ad--8;,come f ! f\r w9ds1 ,o brea?4444 ,i w put my ,_s 9 y1 & ye %all live02 ,rom4 #h3aa--8;give life also to y\r mortal bodies ?r\gh 8 ,_s40 #a ,john #b3a--8;an advocate 77 ) ! ,fa!r1 ,jesus ,*ri/ ! righte\s02 ,john #ad3af1 #ag--8;ano!r ,com=t] 771 t he may be ) y = ev]1 ev5 ! ,_s ( tru?02 ,rom4 #h3bf--8! ,_s himself make? int]cession = u40 #b ,pet4 #a3ba--8m5 spake f ,god1 be+ mov$ by ! ,holy ,_s02 ,john #af3h--8;convict ! _w 9 respect ( s902 #ac--8:5 he1 ! ,_s ( tru?1 is come1 he %all guide y into all ! tru?02 ,rom4 #h3ad--8;z _m z are l$ by ! ,_s ( ,god1 ^! are sons ( ,god40 ,mc,cosh3 ,! works ( ! ,_s are ,conviction1 ,conv]sion1 ,sanctification1 ,com=t4 ,donovan3 ,! ,_s is ! ,_s ( conviction1 enlight5m5t1 quick5+1 9 ! s9n]2 & ( revelation1 remembrance1 witness1 sanctification1 consolation1 to ! sa9t4 ,! ,_s enlight5s ! s9n]1 z ! fla% ( lightn+ lights ! travel] /umbl+ on ! edge ( a precipice at night2 enlight5s ! ,*ri/ian1 z ! ris+ sun reveals a l&scape :i* 0 all !re be=e1 b :i* 0 hidd5 f sight until ! great lum9>y made x visible4 8,! morn+ light did n create ,! lovely prospect x reveal$2 ,x only %[$ ! real /ate ,( :at ! d>kness _h conceal$40 ,*ri/'s advocacy be=e ! ?rone is l t ( legal c\nsel plead+ 9 our /ead2 ! ,holy ,_s's advocacy 9 ! he>t is l ! "m's tea*+ h] *ild to pray = himself4 ,j4 ,w4 ,a4 ,/ew>t3 8,)\t ! "w ( ! ,holy ,_s r$emption w\ld h be5 impossible1 z impossible z t fuel %\ld w>m )\t be+ light$1 or t bread %\ld n\ri% )\t be+ eat54 ,*ri/ is ,god ent]+ into human hi/ory1 b )\t ! ,_s ,*ri/ianity w\ld be only hi/ory4 ,! ,holy ,_s is ,god ent]+ into human he>ts4 ,! ,holy ,_s turns cre$ into life4 ,*ri/ is ! physician :o leaves ! rem$y & !n dep>ts4 ,! ,holy ,_s is ! nurse :o applies & adm9i/]s ! rem$y1 & :o rema9s ) ! pati5t until ! cure is complet$40 ,ma!son1 ,voices ( ! ,_s1 #gh--8;,x is 9 va9 t ! mirror exi/s 9 ! room1 if x is ly+ on its face2 ! sunbeams _c rea* x till its face is upturn$ to !m4 ,heav5 lies ab\t !e n only 9 ?9e infancy b at all times4 ,b x is n en\gh t a place is prep>$ = !e2 ?\ mu/ be prep>$ = ! place4 ,x is n en\gh t ?y light has come2 ?\ ?yself mu/ arise & %9e4 ,no outw>d %9+ c reveal1 unless ?\ art ?yself a reflector ( its glory4 ,! ,_s mu/ set !e on ?y feet1 t ?\ maye/ he> him t speaks to !e 7,ez4 #b3b740 ,! ,holy ,_s reveals n himself b ,*ri/4 ,john #af3ad--8;,he %all glorify me3 = he %all take ( m9e1 & %all decl>e x unto y40 ,s %\ld ! s]vants ( ! ,_s hide !mselves :ile !y make kn[n ,*ri/4 ,e4 ,h4 ,johnson1 ,! ,holy ,_s1 #dj--8,"s ye>s ago a l>ge /eam eng9e all ( glass 0 exhibit$ ab\t ! c\ntry4 ,:5 x 0 at "w "o w\ld see ! pi/on & ! valves g2 b no "o c\ld see :at made !m g4 ,:5 /eam is hot en\gh to be a cont9u\s ela/ic vapor1 x is invisible40 ,s we p]ceive ! pres5ce ( ! ,holy ,_s1 n by visions or voices1 b by ! effect he produces )9 u 9 ! %ape ( new k1 new love1 & new en]gy ( our own p[]s4 ,d5ney1 ,/udies 9 ,!ology1 #afa--8,no man c be> witness to ,*ri/ & to himself at ! same "t4 ,esprit is fatal to unction2 no man c give ! impression t he himself is clev] & also t ,*ri/ is mighty to save4 ,! p[] ( ! ,holy ,_s is felt only :5 ! witness is unconsci\s ( self1 & :5 o!rs rema9 unconsci\s ( him40 ,m\le1 ,v5i ,creator1 #h--8,! ,holy ,_s1 z ,t]tullian says1 is ! vic> ( ,*ri/4 ,! night be=e ! ,cross1 ! ,holy ,_s 0 pres5t to ! m9d ( ,*ri/ z a p]son40 ,gore1 9 ,lux ,mundi1 #cah--8;,x 0 a po9t 9 ! *>ge aga9/ ,orig5 t 8 language seem$ to involve an exclusion ( ! ,holy ,_s f nature1 & a limitation ( 8 activity to ! *ur*4 ,! :ole ( life is c]ta9ly 84 ,& yet1 because 8 special attribute is hol9ess1 x is 9 rational natures1 :i* alone are capable ( hol9ess1 t he ex]ts 8 special influ5ce4 ,a special inbrea?+ ( ! div9e ,_s gave to man 8 prop] be+40 ,see ,g54 #b3g--8;,jehovah ,god 444 brea!d into 8 no/rils ! brea? ( life2 & man became a liv+ s\l02 ,john #c3h--8,! ,_s brea!? :]e x w 444 s is e "o t is born ( ! ,_s40 ,e4 ,h4 ,johnson1 on ,! ,(fices ( ! ,holy ,_s1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,july1 #ahib3cha-chb--8,:y is he specially call$ ! ,holy1 :5 ,fa!r & ,son are also holy1 unless because he produces hol9ess1 i4 e41 makes ! hol9ess ( ,god to be ours individually8 ,*ri/ is ! pr9ciple ( collectivism1 ! ,holy ,_s ! pr9ciple ( individualism4 ,! ,holy ,_s %[s man ! ,*ri/ 9 him4 ,god above all ,fa!r2 ,god ?r\gh all ,son2 ,god 9 all ,holy ,_s 7,eph4 #d3f740 ,! doctr9e ( ! ,holy ,_s has nev] yet be5 sci5tifically unfold$4 ,no treatise on x has appe>$ comp>able to ,julius ,mll]'s ,doctr9e ( ,s91 or to ,i4 ,a4 ,dorn]'s ,hi/ory ( ! ,doctr9e ( ! ,p]son ( ,*ri/4 ,! progress ( doctr9e 9 ! pa/ has be5 m>k$ by successive /ages4 ,a?anasius treat$ ( ! ,tr9ity2 ,augu/9e ( s92 ,anselm ( ! atonem5t2 ,lu!r ( ju/ification2 ,wesley ( reg5]ation2 & ea* ( ^! unfold+s ( doctr9e has be5 accompani$ by religi\s awak5+4 ,we /ill wait = a complete discussion ( ! doctr9e ( ! ,holy ,_s1 & believe t widespread revivals w foll[ ! recognition ( ! omnipot5t ,ag5t 9 revivals4 ,on ! relations ( ! ,holy ,_s to ,*ri/1 see ,ow51 9 ,works1 #c3aeb-aei2 on ! ,holy ,_s's nature & "w1 see works by ,fab]1 ,smeaton1 ,tophel1 ,g4 ,campbell ,morgan1 ,j4 ,d4 ,rob]tson1 ,bi$]wolf2 also ,c4 ,e4 ,smi?1 ,! ,baptism ( ,fire2 ,j4 ,d4 ,?ompson1 ,! ,holy ,com=t]2 ,bu%nell1 ,=giv5ess & ,law1 la/ *apt]2 ,bp4 ,&rews1 ,works1 #c3ajg-djj2 ,james ,s4 ,c&li%1 ,"w ( ! ,holy ,_s2 ,r$=d1 ,vox ,dei2 ,&rew ,murray1 ,! ,_s ( ,*ri/2 ,a4 ,j4 ,gordon1 ,m9i/ry ( ! ,_s2 ,kuyp]1 ,"w ( ! ,holy ,_s2 ,j4 ,e4 ,cumm+1 ,?r\gh ! ,et]nal ,_s2 ,le*l]1 ,lehre vom ,heilig5 ,gei/e2 ,ar?ur1 ,tongue ( ,fire2 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,philosophy & ,religion1 #bej-beh1 & ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #big-cac4 #c4 ,g5]ation & procession consi/5t ) equality4 ,t ! ,son%ip ( ,*ri/ is et]nal1 is intimat$ 9 ,psalm #b3g4 8,?is day h ,i begott5 !e0 is mo/ naturally int]pret$ z ! decl>ation ( an et]nal fact 9 ! div9e nature4 ,nei!r ! inc>nation1 ! baptism1 ! transfiguration1 nor ! resurrection m>ks ! beg9n+ ( ,*ri/'s ,son%ip1 or con/itutes him ,son ( ,god4 ,^! are b recognitions or manife/ations ( a prexi/+ ,son%ip1 insep>able f 8 ,godhood4 ,he is 8born be=e e creature0 7:ile yet no creat$ ?+ exi/$--see ,mey] on ,col4 #a3ae7 & 8by ! resurrection ( ! dead0 is n made to be1 b only 8decl>$ to be10 8accord+ to ! ,_s ( hol9ess0 7 accord+ to 8 div9e nature7 8! ,son ( ,god ) p[]0 7see ,philippi & ,al=d on ,rom4 #a3c1 #d74 ,?is ,son%ip is unique--n pr$icable (1 or %>$ )1 any creature4 ,! ,scriptures intimate1 n only an et]nal g5]ation ( ! ,son1 b an et]nal procession ( ! ,_s4 ,psalm #b3g--8;,i w tell ( ! decree3 ,jehovah said unto me1 ,?\ art my ,son2 ,?is day ,i h begott5 !e0 see ,alex&]1 ,com4 9 loco2 also ,com4 on ,acts #ac3cc--8#8,to-day' ref]s to ! date ( ! decree itself2 b ?is1 z a div9e act1 0 et]nal1--& s mu/ be ! ,son%ip :i* x affirms40 ,philo says t 8to-day0 ) ,god means 8=ev]40 ,?is begett+ ( :i* ! ,psalm speaks is n ! resurrection1 = :ile ,paul 9 ,acts #ac3cc ref]s to ?is ,psalm to e/abli% ! fact ( ,jesus' ,son%ip1 he ref]s 9 ,acts #ac3cd1 #ce to ano!r ,psalm1 ! sixte5?1 to e/abli% ! fact t ?is ,son ( ,god 0 to rise f ! dead4 ,*ri/ is %[n to be ,son ( ,god by 8 inc>nation 7,heb4 #a3e1 #f--8:5 he aga9 br+e? 9 ! fir/born into ! _w he sai?1 ,& let all ! angels ( ,god wor%ip him071 8 baptism 7,mat4 #c3ag--8,?is is my belov$ ,son071 8 transfiguration 7,mat4 #ag3e--8,?is is my belov$ ,son071 8 resurrection 7,acts #ac3cd1 #ce--8;z conc]n+ t he rais$ him up f ! dead 444 he sai? also 9 ano!r psalm1 ,?\ wilt n give ?y ,holy ,"o to see corruption074 ,col4 #a3ae--8! fir/born ( all creation0-- 8begott5 fir/ be=e all creation0 7,julius ,mll]1 ,pro(-texts1 #ad72 or 8fir/-born be=e e creature1 i4 e41 begott51 & t antec$5tly to ev]y?+ t 0 creat$0 7,ellicott1 ,com4 9 loco74 8,h]e90 7says ,lu?>dt1 ,comp5d4 ,dogmatik1 #ha1 on ,col4 #a3ae7 8is indicat$ an antemundane orig9 f ,god--a relation int]nal to ! div9e nature40 ,lightfoot1 on ,col4 #a3ae1 says t 9 ,rabbi ,be*ai ,god is call$ ! 8primog5itus mundi40 ,on ,rom4 #a3d 7 8manife/$ to be ! mighty ,son ( ,god07 see ,lange's ,com41 notes by ,s*aff on pages #ef & #fa4 ,bruce1 ,apologetics1 #djd--8,! resurrection 0 ! actual introduction ( ,*ri/ into ! full possession ( div9e ,son%ip s f> z !reto belong$1 n only ! inn] ( a holy spiritual ess5ce1 b also ! out] ( an exi/5ce 9 p[] & heav5ly glory40 ,all51 ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 #cec1 #ced--8;,calv9 waves aside et]nal g5]ation z an #8absurd fiction4' ,b to ma9ta9 ! deity ( ,*ri/ m]ely on ! gr\nd t x is ess5tial to 8 mak+ an adequate atonem5t = s91 is to involve ! rejection ( 8 deity if ev] ! doctr9e ( atonem5t becomes obnoxi\s4444 ,su* 0 ! process by :i*1 9 ! m9d ( ! la/ c5tury1 ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity 0 und]m9$4 ,n to gr\nd ! di/9ctions ( ! div9e ess5ce by "s imman5t et]nal necessity 0 to make easy ! d5ial ( :at has be5 call$ ! ontological ,tr9ity1 & !n ! rejection ( ! economical ,tr9ity 0 n difficult or f> away40 ,if ,we/cott & ,hort's read+ 1 8! only begott5 ,god10 9 ,john #a3ah1 is correct1 we h a new pro( ( ,*ri/'s et]nal ,son%ip4 ,mey] expla9s 9 ,rom4 #h3c--8;,god1 s5d+ 8 own ,son10 z an allusion to ! metaphysical ,son%ip4 ,t ?is ,son%ip is unique1 is pla9 f ,john #a3ad1 #ah--8! only begott5 f ! ,fa!r 444 ! only begott5 ,son :o is 9 ! bosom ( ! fa!r02 ,rom4 #h3cb--8;8 own ,son02 ,gal4 #d3d--8s5t =? 8 ,son02 cf4 ,prov4 #h3bb-ca--8,:5 he m>k$ out ! f\ndations ( ! e>?2 ,!n ,i 0 by him z a ma/] workman02 #cj3d--8,:o ha? e/abli%$ all ! ends ( ! e>?8 ,:at is 8 "n1 & :at is 8 son's "n1 if ?\ kn[e/80 ,! et]nal procession ( ! ,_s seems to be impli$ 9 ,john #ae3bf--8! ,_s ( tru? :i* proce$e? f ! ,fa!r0--see ,we/cott1 ,bib4 ,com41 9 loco2 ,heb4 #i3ad--8! et]nal ,_s40 ,we/cott "h says t 7n 7 %[s t ! ref]5ce is to ! temporal mission ( ! ,holy ,_s1 n to ! et]nal procession4 ,at ! same "t he ma9ta9s t ! temporal corresponds to ! et]nal4 ,! ,scripture t]ms 8g5]ation0 & 8procession10 z appli$ to ! ,son & to ! ,holy ,_s1 are b approximate expressions ( ! tru?1 & we are to correct by o!r decl>ations ( ,scripture any imp]fect impressions :i* we might d]ive solely f !m4 ,we use ^! t]ms 9 a special s5se1 :i* we explicitly /ate & def9e z exclud+ all notion ( inequality betwe5 ! p]sons ( ! ,tr9ity4 ,! et]nal g5]ation ( ! ,son to :i* we hold is 7a7 ,n creation1 b ! ,fa!r's communication ( himself to ! ,son4 ,s9ce ! names1 ,fa!r1 ,son1 & ,holy ,_s are n applicable to ! div9e ess5ce1 b are only applicable to its hypo/atical di/9ctions1 !y imply no d]ivation ( ! ess5ce ( ! ,son f ! ess5ce ( ! ,fa!r4 ,! error ( ! ,nic5e ,fa!rs 0 t ( expla9+ ,son%ip z d]ivation ( ess5ce4 ,! ,fa!r _c imp>t 8 ess5ce to ! ,son & yet reta9 x4 ,! ,fa!r is fons tr9itatis1 n fons deitatis4 ,see ,%$d1 ,hi/4 ,doct41 #a3cjh-caa1 & ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3bhg-bii2 p] contra1 see ,bib4 ,sac41 #da3fih-gfj4 7b7 ,n a comm5cem5t ( exi/5ce1 b an et]nal relation to ! ,fa!r1--!re nev] hav+ be5 a "t :5 ! ,son began to be1 or :5 ! ,son did n exi/ z ,god ) ! ,fa!r4 ,if !re _h be5 an et]nal sun1 x is evid5t t !re mu/ h be5 an et]nal sunlight also4 ,yet an et]nal sunlight mu/ h ev]more proce$$ f ! sun4 ,:5 ,cyril 0 ask$ :e!r ! ,son exi/$ be=e g5]ation1 he answ]$3 8,! g5]ation ( ! ,son did n prec$e 8 exi/5ce1 b he always exi/$1 & t by g5]ation40 7c7 ,n an act ( ! ,fa!r's w1 b an int]nal necessity ( ! div9e nature1--s t ! ,son is no m dep5d5t ^u ! ,fa!r ?an ! ,fa!r is dep5d5t ^u ! ,son1 & s t1 if x be consi/5t ) deity to be ,fa!r1 x is equally consi/5t ) deity to be ,son4 ,! sun is z dep5d5t ^u ! sunlight z ! sunlight is ^u ! sun2 = )\t sunlight ! sun is no true sun4 ,s ,god ! ,fa!r is z dep5d5t ^u ,god ! ,son1 z ,god ! ,son is dep5d5t ^u ,god ! ,fa!r2 = )\t ,son ! ,fa!r w\ld be no true ,fa!r4 ,to say t aseity belongs only to ! ,fa!r is logically ,arianism & ,subord9ationism prop]1 = x implies a subord9ation ( ! ess5ce ( ! ,son to ! ,fa!r4 ,ess5tial subord9ation w\ld be inconsi/5t ) equality4 ,see ,?omasius1 ,*ri/i ,p]son und ,w]k1 #a3aae4 ,palm]1 ,!ol4 ,def9itions1 #ff1 #fg1 says t ,fa!r indep5d5t life2 ,son begott5 indep5d5t life volunt>ily br\ght "u limitations2 ,_s necess>y consequ5ce ( exi/5ce ( ! o!r two4444 ,! words & actions :]eby we design to affect o!rs are 8begott540 ,! atmosph]e ( unconsci\s influ5ce is n 8begott510 b 8proce$+40 7d7 ,n a relation 9 any way analog\s to physical d]ivation1 b a life-movem5t ( ! div9e nature1 9 virtue ( :i* ,fa!r1 ,son1 & ,holy ,_s1 :ile equal 9 ess5ce & dignity1 /& to ea* o!r 9 an ord] ( p]sonality1 (fice1 & op]ation1 & 9 virtue ( :i* ! ,fa!r works ?r\gh ! ,son1 & ! ,fa!r & ! ,son ?r\gh ! ,_s4 ,! subord9ation ( ! p]son ( ! ,son to ! p]son ( ! ,fa!r1 or 9 o!r words an ord] ( p]sonality1 (fice1 & op]ation :i* p]mits ! ,fa!r to be (ficially fir/1 ! ,son second1 & ! ,_s ?ird1 is p]fectly consi/5t ) equality4 ,priority is n necess>ily sup]iority4 ,! possibility ( an ord]1 :i* yet involves no inequality1 may be illu/rat$ by ! relation betwe5 man & woman4 ,9 (fice man is fir/ & woman second1 b woman's s\l is wor? z mu* z man's2 see #a ,cor4 #aa3c--8! head ( e man is ,*ri/2 & ! head ( ! woman is ! man3 & ! head ( ,*ri/ is ,god40 ,on ,john #ad3bh--8! ,fa!r is great] ?an ,i0--see ,we/cott1 ,bib4 ,com41 9 loco4 ,edw>ds1 ,obs]vations on ! ,tr9ity 7edit$ by ,smy?71 #bb--8;,9 ! ,son ! :ole deity & glory ( ! ,fa!r is z x 7 repeat$ or duplicat$4 ,ev]y?+ 9 ! ,fa!r is repeat$ or express$ aga91 & t fully1 s t !re is prop]ly no inf]iority40 ,edw>ds1 ,essay on ! ,tr9ity 7edit$ by ,fi%]71 #aaj-aaf--8,! ,fa!r is ! ,deity subsi/+ 9 ! prime1 unorig9at$1 & mo/ absolute mann]1 or ! ,deity 9 its direct exi/5ce4 ,! ,son is ! ,deity g5]at$ by ,god's und]/&+1 or hav+ an ,idea ( himself & subsi/+ 9 t ,idea4 ,! ,holy ,gho/ is ! ,deity subsi/+ 9 act1 or ! div9e ess5ce fl[+ out & brea!d =? 9 ,god's inf9ite love to & delight 9 himself4 ,& ,i believe ! :ole div9e ess5ce does truly & di/9ctly subsi/ bo? 9 ! div9e ,idea & 9 ! div9e ,love1 & ea* ( !m are prop]ly di/9ct p]sons4444 ,we f9d no o!r attributes ( :i* x is said 9 ,scripture t !y are ,god1 or t ,god is !y1 b & 1 ! ,reason & ! ,love ( ,god1 ,light n be+ diff]5t f ,reason4444 ,und]/&+ may be pr$icat$ ( ?is ,love4444 ,x is n a bl9d ,love4444 ,! ,fa!r has ,wisdom or ,reason by ! ,son's be+ 9 him4444 ,und]/&+ is 9 ! ,holy ,_s1 because ! ,son is 9 him40 ,yet ,dr4 ,edw>ds ,a4 ,p>k decl>$ et]nal g5]ation to be 8et]nal nons5se10 & is ?\ght to h hid ,edw>ds's unpubli%$ ,essay on ! ,tr9ity = _m ye>s because x taught ?is doctr9e4 ,! ,new ,te/am5t calls ,*ri/ 1 b n 4 ,we frankly recognize an et]nal subord9ation ( ,*ri/ to ! ,fa!r1 b we ma9ta9 at ! same "t t ?is subord9ation is a subord9ation ( ord]1 (fice1 & op]ation1 n a subord9ation ( ess5ce4 8,non de ess5tia dicitur1 s$ de m9i/]iis40 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,an et]nal g5]ation is necess>ily an et]nal subord9ation & dep5d5ce4 ,?is seems to be fully admitt$ ev5 by ! mo/ or?odox ( ! ,anglican writ]s1 su* z ,pe>son & ,hook]4 ,*ri/'s subord9ation to ! ,fa!r is m]ely (ficial1 n ess5tial40 ,:iton1 ,gloria ,patri1 #db1 #if--8,! e>ly ,tr9it>ians by et]nal ,son%ip meant1 fir/1 t x is ( ! v nature ( ,deity to issue =? into visible expression4 ,?us next1 t ?is outw>d expression ( ,god is n some?+ o!r ?an ,god1 b ,god himself1 9 a self-expression z div9e z ! hidd5 ,deity4 ,?us !y answ]$ ,philip's cry1 #8%[ u ! ,fa!r1 & x suffice? u' 7,john #ad3h71 & ?us !y affirm$ ,jesus' decl>ation1 !y secur$ ,paul's fai? t ,god has nev] left himself )\t witness4 ,!y meant1 #8he t ha? se5 me ha? se5 ! ,fa!r' 7,john #ad3i74444 ,! ,fa!r is ! ,life transc5d5t1 ! div9e ,s\rce1 #8above all'2 ! ,son is ! ,life imman5t1 ! div9e ,/ream1 #8?r\gh all'2 ! ,holy ,_s is ! ,life individualiz$1 #89 all' 7,eph4 #d3f74 ,! ,holy ,_s has be5 call$ #8! executive ( ! ,godhead4' 0 ,:iton is "h speak+ ( ! economic ,tr9ity2 b all ?is is ev5 m true ( ! imman5t ,tr9ity4 ,on ! ,et]nal ,son%ip1 see ,weiss1 ,bib4 ,!ol4 ,n4 ,t41 #dbd1 note2 ,treffrey1 ,et]nal ,son%ip ( our ,"l2 ,pr9ceton ,essays1 #a3cj-ef2 ,watson1 ,in/itutes1 #a3ecj-egg2 ,bib4 ,sac41 #bg3bfh4 ,on ! procession ( ! ,_s1 see ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3cjj-cjd1 & ,hi/ory ( ,doctr9e1 #a3chg2 ,dick1 ,lectures on ,!ology1 #a3cdg-cej4 ,! same pr9ciples ^u :i* we int]pret ! decl>ation ( ,*ri/'s et]nal ,son%ip apply to ! procession ( ! ,holy ,_s f ! ,fa!r ?r\gh ! ,son1 & %[ ?is to be n inconsi/5t ) ! ,_s's equal dignity & glory4 ,we !re=e only =mulate tru? :i* is concretely express$ 9 ,scripture1 & :i* is recogniz$ by all ages ( ! *ur* 9 hymns & pray]s address$ to ,fa!r1 ,son1 & ,holy ,_s1 :5 we ass]t t 9 ! nature ( ! "o ,god !re are ?ree et]nal di/9ctions1 :i* are be/ describ$ z p]sons1 & ea* ( :i* is ! prop] & equal object ( ,*ri/ian wor%ip4 ,we are also w>rant$ 9 decl>+ t1 9 virtue ( ^! p]sonal di/9ctions or modes ( subsi/5ce1 ,god exi/s 9 ! relations1 respectively1 fir/1 ( ,s\rce1 ,orig91 ,au?ority1 & 9 ?is relation is ! ,fa!r2 secondly1 ( ,expression1 ,m$ium1 ,revelation1 & 9 ?is relation is ! ,son2 ?irdly1 ( ,appreh5sion1 ,accompli%m5t1 ,realization1 & 9 ?is relation is ! ,holy ,_s4 ,john ,ow51 ,works1 #c3fd-ib--8,! (fice ( ! ,holy ,_s is t ( conclud+1 complet+1 p]fect+4 ,to ! ,fa!r we assign op]a natur2 to ! ,son1 op]a grati procurat2 to ! ,_s1 op]a grati applicat40 ,all ,god's revelations are ?r\gh ! ,son or ! ,_s1 & ! latt] includes ! =m]4 ,kuyp]1 ,"w ( ! ,holy ,_s1 designates ! ?ree (fices respectively z ^? ( ,causation1 ,con/ruction1 ,consummation2 ! ,fa!r br+s =?1 ! ,son arranges1 ! ,_s p]fects4 ,all51 ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 #cfe-cgc--8;,god is ,life1 ,light1 ,love4 ,z ! ,fa!rs reg>d$ ,reason bo? 9 ,god & man z ! p]sonal1 omnipres5t second ,p]son ( ! ,tr9ity1 s ,jona?an ,edw>ds reg>d$ ,love bo? 9 ,god & 9 man z ! p]sonal1 omnipres5t ?ird ,p]son ( ! ,tr9ity4 ,h5ce ! ,fa!r is nev] said to love ! ,_s z he is said to love ! ,son--= ?is love is ! ,_s4 ,! ,fa!r & ! ,son are said to love m51 b ! ,holy ,_s is nev] said to love !m1 = love is ! ,holy ,_s4 ,b :y c\ld n ,edw>ds also hold t ! ,logos or div9e ,reason also dwelt 9 humanity1 s t manhood 0 con/itut$ 9 ,*ri/ & %>$ ) him 9 ! consub/antial image ( ! ,fa!r8 ,outw>d nature reflects ,god's light & has ,*ri/ 9 x1--:y n univ]sal humanity80 ,mob]ly1 ,atonem5t & ,p]sonality1 #acf1 #bjb1 speaks ( 8#a4 ,god1 ! ,et]nal1 ! ,inf9ite1 9 8 inf9ity1 z himself2 #b4 ,god1 z self-express$ )9 ! nature & faculties ( man--body1 s\l1 & _s--! consummation & int]pretation & revelation ( :at true manhood means & is1 9 its v tru?1 9 its relation to ,god2 #c4 ,god1 z ,_s ( ,beauty & ,hol9ess1 :i* are himself pres5t 9 ?+s creat$1 animate & inanimate1 & con/itut+ 9 !m _! div9e response to ,god2 con/itut+ above all 9 creat$ p]sonalities ! full reality ( _! p]sonal response4 ,or aga93 #a4 ,:at a man is invisibly 9 himself2 #b4 8 outw>d mat]ial projection or expression z body2 & #c4 ! response :i* t :i* he is ?r\gh 8 bodily utt]ance or op]ation makes to him1 z ! true e*o or expression ( himself40 ,mob]ly seeks ?us to f9d 9 man's nature an analogy to ! inn] processes ( ! div9e4 ,,vi4 ,inscrutable1 yet n self-contradictory1 ?is ,doctr9e furni%es ! ,key to all o!r ,doctr9es4 #a4 ,! mode ( ?is triune exi/5ce is inscrutable4 ,x is inscrutable because !re are no analogies to x 9 our f9ite exp]i5ce4 ,= ?is reason all attempts are va9 adequately to repres5t x2 7a7 ,f inanimate ?+s--z ! f\nta91 ! /ream1 & ! rivulet trickl+ f x 7,a?anasius72 ! cl\d1 ! ra91 & ! ris+ mi/ 7,bo>dman72 color1 %ape1 & size 7,f4 ,w4 ,rob]tson72 ! act9ic1 lum9if]\s1 & calorific pr9ciples 9 ! ray ( light 7,sol> ,hi]oglyphics1 #cd74 ,lu!r3 8,:5 logic objects to ?is doctr9e t x does n squ>e ) h] rules1 we mu/ say2 #8,muli] taceat 9 ecclesia4' 0 ,lu!r call$ ! ,tr9ity a fl[]1 9 :i* might be di/+ui%$ its =m1 its fragrance1 & its m$ic9al efficacy2 see ,dorn]1 ,ges*4 prot4 ,!ol41 #ahi4 ,9 ,bap4 ,rev41 ,july1 #ahhj3dcd1 ,ge] f9ds an illu/ration ( ! ,tr9ity 9 inf9ite space ) its ?ree dim5sions4 ,= analogy ( ! cl\d1 ra91 mi/1 see ,w4 ,e4 ,bo>dman1 ,high] ,*ri/ian ,life4 ,sol> ,hi]oglyphics1 #cd 7review$ 9 ,new ,engl&]1 ,oct4 #ahgd3ghi7--8,! ,godhead is a trip]sonal unity1 & ! light is a tr9ity4 ,be+ immat]ial & homog5e\s1 & ?us ess5tially "o 9 its nature1 ! light includes a plurality ( con/itu5ts1 or 9 o!r words is ess5tially ?ree 9 its con/itution1 its con/itu5t pr9ciples be+ ! act9ic1 ! lum9if]\s1 & ! calorific2 & 9 glori\s manife/ation ! light is "o1 & is ! creat$1 con/itut$1 & orda9$ emblem ( ! trip]sonal ,god0--( :om x is said t 8,god is light1 & 9 him is no d>kness at all0 7#a ,john #a3e74 ,! act9ic rays are 9 !mselves invisible2 only z ! lum9if]\s manife/ !m1 are !y se52 only z ! calorific accompany !m1 are !y felt4 ,joseph ,cook3 8,sunlight1 ra9b[1 heat--"o sol> radiance2 ,fa!r1 ,son1 ,holy ,_s1 "o ,god4 ,z ! ra9b[ %[s :at light is :5 unfold$1 s ,*ri/ reveals ! nature ( ,god4 ,z ! ra9b[ is unravel$ light1 s ,*ri/ is unravel$ ,god1 & ! ,holy ,_s1 figur$ by heat1 is ,*ri/'s cont9u$ life40 ,rud] illu/rations are ^? ( ,oom ,paul ,krg]3 ! fat1 ! wick1 ! flame1 9 ! c&le2 & ( ,augu/9e3 ! root1 trunk1 bran*es1 all ( "o wood1 9 ! tree4 ,9 ,ge]'s illu/ration1 m5tion$ above1 f ! ?ree dim5sions ( space1 we _c demon/rate t !re is n a f\r?1 b besides l5g?1 bread?1 & ?ickness1 we _c conceive ( its exi/5ce4 ,z ^! ?ree exhau/1 s f> z we "k1 all possible modes ( mat]ial be+1 s we _c conceive ( any f\r? p]son 9 ! ,godhead4 7b7 ,f ! con/itution or processes ( our own m9ds--z ! psy*ological unity ( intellect1 affection1 & w 7sub/antially held by ,augu/9e72 ! logical unity ( !sis1 anti!sis1 & syn!sis 7,hegel72 ! metaphysical unity ( subject1 object1 & subject-object 7,melan*?on1 ,ol%aus51 ,%$d74 ,augu/9e3 8,m5s mem9it sui1 intelligit se1 diligit se2 si hoc c]nimus1 ,tr9itatem c]nimus40444 ,i exi/1 ,i am consci\s1 ,i w2 ,i exi/ z consci\s & will+1 ,i am consci\s ( exi/+ & will+1 ,i w to exi/ & be consci\s2 & ^! ?ree functions1 ?\gh di/9ct1 are insep>able & =m "o life1 "o m9d1 "o ess5ce4444 8,amor autem alicujus amantis e/1 et amore aliquid amatur4 ,ecce tria sunt1 amans1 et quod amatur1 et amor4 ,quid e/ ergo amor1 nisi qudam vita duo aliqua copulans1 vel copul>e appetans1 amantem scilicet et quod amatur40 ,calv9 speaks ( ,augu/9e's view z 8a speculation f> f solid40 ,b ,augu/9e himself _h said3 8,if ask$ to def9e ! ,tr9ity1 we c only say t x is n ?is or t40 ,john ( ,damascus3 8,all we "k ( ! div9e nature is t x is n to be kn[n40 ,by ?is1 h[ev]1 bo? ,augu/9e & ,john ( ,damascus meant only t ! precise mode ( ,god's triune exi/5ce is unreveal$ & inscrutable4 ,hegel1 ,philos4 ,relig41 transl41 #c3ii1 #ajj--8;,god is1 b is at ! same "t ! ,o!r1 ! self-diff]5tiat+1 ! ,o!r 9 ! s5se t ?is ,o!r is ,god himself & has pot5tially ! ,div9e nature 9 x1 & t ! aboli%+ ( ?is diff]5ce1 ( ?is o!rness1 ?is return1 ?is love1 is ,_s40 ,hegel calls ,god 8! absolute ,idea1 ! unity ( ,life & ,cognition1 ! ,univ]sal t ?9ks itself & ?9k+ly recognizes itself 9 an inf9ite ,actuality1 f :i*1 z its ,imm$iacy1 x no less di/+ui%es itself aga902 see ,s*wegl]1 ,hi/ory ( ,philosophy1 #cba1 #cca4 ,hegel's g5]al doctr9e is t ! highe/ unity is to be rea*$ only ?r\gh ! fulle/ developm5t & reconciliation ( ! deepe/ & wide/ antagonism4 ,pure be+ is pure no?+2 we mu/ die to live4 ,light is !sis1 ,d>kness is anti!sis1 ,%ad[ is syn!sis1 or union ( bo?4 ,fai? is !sis1 ,unbelief is anti!sis1 ,d\bt is syn!sis1 or union ( bo?4 ,zweifel comes f ,zwei1 z d\bt f 4 ,hegel call$ ,napoleon 8e9 ,weltgei/ zu ,pf]de0--8a _w-_s on horseback40 ,ladd1 ,introd4 to ,philosophy1 #bjb1 speaks ( 8! monoton\s tit-tat-too ( ! ,hegelian logic40 ,rusk9 speaks ( x z 8pure1 def9ite1 & highly f9i%$ nons5se40 ,on ! ,hegelian pr9ciple good & evil _c be contradictory to ea* o!r2 )\t evil !re c\ld be no good4 ,/irl+ well entitl$ 8 exposition ( ! ,hegelian ,philosophy 8,! ,secret ( ,hegel10 & 8 read]s h (t5 rem>k$ t1 if ,/irl+ discov]$ ! secret1 he nev] made x kn[n4 ,"l ,col]idge told ,rob]t ,br[n+ t he c\ld n und]/& all 8 poetry4 8,ah1 well10 repli$ ! poet1 8if a read] ( y\r calibre und]/&s t5 p] c5t4 ( :at ,i write1 he ought to be cont5t40 ,:5 ,wordswor? 0 told t ,mr4 ,br[n+ _h m>ri$ ,miss ,b>rett1 he said3 8,x is a good ?+ t ^! two und]/& ea* o!r1 = no "o else und]/&s !m40 ,a pupil once br\ght to ,hegel a passage 9 ! latt]'s writ+s & ask$ = an int]pretation4 ,! philosoph] exam9$ x & repli$3 8,:5 t passage 0 writt51 !re 7 two :o knew its mean+--,god & myself4 ,n[1 alas6 !re is b "o1 & t is ,god40 ,he9ri* ,he9e1 speak+ ( ! effect ( ,hegelianism ^u ! religi\s life ( ,b]l91 says3 8,i c\ld accommodate myself to ! v enlight5$ ,*ri/ianity1 filtrat$ f all sup]/ition1 :i* c\ld !n be _h 9 ! *ur*es1 & :i* 0 free f ! div9ity ( ,*ri/1 l turtle s\p )\t turtle40 ,:5 ,g]man sy/ems ( philosophy die1 _! gho/s take up _! abode 9 ,ox=d4 ,b if ,i see a gho/ sitt+ 9 a *air & !n sit d[n boldly 9 ! *air1 ! gho/ w take (f5ce & g away4 ,hegel's doctr9e ( ,god z ! only begott5 ,son is translat$ 9 ! ,j\rn4 ,spec4 ,philos41 #ae3cie-djd4 ,! mo/ satisfactory exposition ( ! analogy ( subject1 object1 & subject-object is to be f\nd 9 ,%$d1 ,hi/ory ( ,doctr9e1 #a3cfe1 note #b4 ,see also ,ol%aus5 on ,john #a3a2 ,h4 ,n4 ,day1 ,doctr9e ( ,tr9ity 9 ,light ( ,rec5t ,psy*ology1 9 ,pr9ceton ,rev41 ,sept4 #ahhb3aef-agi2 ,morris1 ,philosophy & ,*ri/ianity1 #abb-afc4 ,mob]ly1 ,atonem5t & ,p]sonality1 #agd1 has a simil> analogy3 #a4 ,a man's invisible self2 #b4 ! visible expression ( himself 9 a picture or poem2 #c4 ! response ( ?is picture or poem to himself4 ,! analogy ( ! family is held to be ev5 bett]1 because no man's p]sonality is complete 9 itself2 husb&1 wife1 & *ild are all ne$$ to make p]fect unity4 ,all51 ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 #cgb1 says t 9 ! e>ly *ur* ! ,tr9ity 0 a doctr9e ( reason2 9 ! ,middle ,ages x 0 a my/]y2 9 ! #ah? c5tury x 0 a mean+less or irrational dogma2 aga9 9 ! #ai? c5tury x becomes a doctr9e ( ! reason1 a tru? ess5tial to ! nature ( ,god4 ,to ,all5's *>act]ization ( ! /ages 9 ! hi/ory ( ! doctr9e we w\ld add t ev5 9 our day we _c say t a complete exposition ( ! ,tr9ity is possible4 ,tr9ity is a unique fact1 diff]5t aspects ( :i* may be illu/rat$1 :ile1 z a :ole1 x has no analogies4 ,! mo/ we c say is t human nature1 9 its processes & p[]s1 po9ts t[>ds some?+ high] ?an itself1 & t ,tr9ity 9 ,god is ne$$ 9 ord] to con/itute t p]fection ( be+ :i* man seeks z an object ( love1 wor%ip & s]vice4 ,no "o ( ^! furni%es any prop] analogue ( ! ,tr9ity1 s9ce 9 no "o ( !m is !re f\nd ! ess5tial elem5t ( trip]sonality4 ,su* illu/rations may sometimes be us$ to dis>m objection1 b !y furni% no positive explanation ( ! my/]y ( ! ,tr9ity1 &1 unless c>efully gu>d$1 may lead to griev\s error4 #b4 ,! ,doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity is n self-contradictory4 ,?is x w\ld be1 only if x decl>$ ,god to be ?ree 9 ! same num]ical s5se 9 :i* he is said to be "o4 ,?is we d n ass]t4 ,we ass]t simply t ! same ,god :o is "o ) respect to 8 ess5ce is ?ree ) respect to ! int]nal di/9ctions ( t ess5ce1 or ) respect to ! modes ( 8 be+4 ,! possibility ( ?is _c be d5i$1 except by assum+ t ! human m9d is 9 all respects ! measure ( ! div9e4 ,! fact t ! asc5d+ scale ( life is m>k$ by increas+ diff]5tiation ( faculty & function %\ld r lead u to expect 9 ! highe/ ( all be+s a nature m complex ?an our own4 ,9 man _m faculties are unit$ 9 "o intellig5t be+1 & ! m intellig5t man is1 ! m di/9ct f ea* o!r ^! faculties become2 until intellect & affection1 consci5ce & w assume a relative indep5d5ce1 & !re arises ev5 ! possibility ( conflict betwe5 !m4 ,!re is no?+ irrational or self-contradictory 9 ! doctr9e t 9 ,god ! lead+ functions are yet m m>k$ly diff]5tiat$1 s t !y become p]sonal1 :ile at ! same "t ^! p]sonalities are unit$ by ! fact t !y ea* & equally manife/ ! "o indivisible ess5ce4 ,unity is z ess5tial to ! ,godhead z ?re5ess4 ,! same ,god :o 9 "o respect is ?ree1 9 ano!r respect is "o4 ,we d n say t "o ,god is ?ree ,gods1 nor t "o p]son is ?ree p]sons1 nor t ?ree ,gods are "o ,god1 b only t !re is "o ,god ) ?ree di/9ctions 9 8 be+4 ,we d n ref] to ! faculties ( man z furni%+ any prop] analogy to ! p]sons ( ! ,godhead2 we r d5y t man's nature furni%es any su* analogy4 ,intellect1 affection1 & w 9 man are n di/9ct p]sonalities4 ,if !y 7 p]sonaliz$1 !y might furni% su* an analogy4 ,f4 ,w4 ,rob]tson1 ,s]mons1 #c3eh1 speaks ( ! ,fa!r1 ,son1 & ,holy ,_s z be/ conceiv$ "u ! figure ( p]sonaliz$ intellect1 affection & w4 ,) ?is agrees ! say+ ( ,socrates1 :o call$ ?\ght ! s\l's conv]sation ) itself4 ,see ,d4 ,w4 ,simon1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,jan4 #ahhg4 ,ps4 #hf3aa--8,unite my he>t to fe> ?y "n0--intimates a complexity ( p[]s 9 man1 & a possible disorganization due to s94 ,only ! fe> & love ( ,god c r$uce our faculties to ord] & give u peace1 purity1 & p[]4 ,:5 ,william aft] a long c\rt%ip at l5g? propos$ m>riage1 ,m>y said t %e 8unanim\sly cons5t$40 8,?\ %alt love ! ,"l ?y ,god ) all ?y he>t1 & ) all ?y s\l1 & ) all ?y /r5g?1 & ) all ?y m9d0 7,luke #aj3bg74 ,man mu/ n lead a dual life1 a d\ble life1 l t ( ,dr4 ,jekyll & ,mr4 ,hyde4 ,! good life is ! unifi$ life4 ,h4 ,h4 ,bawd53 8,!oretically1 symmetrical developm5t is ! complete crit]ion4 ,?is is ! old ,greek conception ( ! p]fect life4 ,! t]m :i* we translate #8temp]ance' or #8self-control' is bett] express$ by #8:ole-m9d$ness4' 0 ,ill+wor?1 ,p]sonality ,div9e & ,human1 #ed-hj--8,our s5se ( div9e p]sonality culm9ates 9 ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity4 ,man's p]sonality is ess5tially triune1 because x consi/s ( a subject1 an object1 & _! relation4 ,:at is pot5tial & unrealiz$ triunity 9 man is complete 9 ,god4444 ,our own p]sonality is triune1 b x is a pot5tial unrealiz$ triunity1 :i* is incomplete 9 itself & mu/ g beyond itself = completion1 z = example 9 ! family4444 ,b ,god's p]sonality has no?+ pot5tial or unrealiz$ ab\t x4444 ,tr9ity is ! mo/ intelligible mode ( conceiv+ ( ,god z p]sonal40 ,john ,caird1 ,fundam5tal ,ideas ( ,*ri/ianity1 #a3ei1 #hj--8,! p>ts ( a /one are all precisely alike2 ! p>ts ( a skilful me*anism are all diff]5t f "o ano!r4 ,9 :i* ( ! two cases is ! unity m real--9 t 9 :i* !re is an abs5ce ( di/9ction1 or 9 t 9 :i* !re is ess5tial diff]5ce ( =m & function1 ea* sep>ate "p hav+ an individuality & activity ( its own8 ,! highe/ unities are n simple b complex40 ,gordon1 ,*ri/ ( ,to-day1 #ajf--8;,all ?+s & p]sons are modes ( "o inf9ite consci\sness4 ,!n x is n incr$ible t !re %\ld be ?ree consci\snesses 9 ,god4 ,ov] aga9/ ! multitud9\s f9ite p]sonalities are ?ree inf9ite p]sonalities4 ,?is socialism 9 ,deity may be ! gr\nd ( human society40 ,! ph5om5a ( d\ble & ev5 ( triple consci\sness 9 "o & ! same individual confirm ?is view4 ,?is fact ( m ?an "o consci\sness 9 a f9ite creature po9ts t[>ds ! possibility ( a ?reefold consci\sness 9 ! nature ( ,god4 ,romanes1 ,m9d & ,motion1 #ajb1 intimates t ! social organism1 if x atta9$ ! highe/ level ( psy*ical p]fection1 might be end[$ ) p]sonality1 & t x n[ has some?+ resembl+ x--ph5om5a ( ?\ght & conduct :i* compel u to conceive ( families & communities & nations z hav+ a sort ( moral p]sonality :i* implies responsibility & acc\ntability4 8,! ,zeitgei/10 he says1 8is ! product ( a k9d ( collective psy*ology1 :i* is some?+ o!r ?an ! sum ( all ! individual m9ds ( a g5]ation40 ,we d n ma9ta9 t any "o ( ^! fragm5t>y or collective consci\snesses atta9s p]sonality 9 man1 at lea/ 9 ! pres5t life4 ,we only ma9ta9 t !y indicate t a l>g] & m complex life is possible ?an t ( :i* we h common exp]i5ce1 & t !re is no necess>y contradiction 9 ! doctr9e t 9 ! nature ( ! "o & p]fect ,god !re are ?ree p]sonal di/9ctions4 ,r4 ,h4 ,hutton3 8,a volunt>y self-revelation ( ! div9e m9d may be expect$ to reveal ev5 deep] complexities ( spiritual relations 9 8 et]nal nature & ess5ce ?an are f\nd to exi/ 9 our humanity--! simplicity ( a h>moniz$ complexity1 n ! simplicity ( absolute unity40 #c4 ,! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity has important relations to o!r doctr9es4 ,a4 ,x is ess5tial to any prop] !ism4 ,nei!r ,god's indep5d5ce nor ,god's bless$ness c be ma9ta9$ ^u gr\nds ( absolute unity4 ,anti-tr9it>ianism almo/ necess>ily makes creation indisp5sable to ,god's p]fection1 t5ds to a belief 9 ! et]nity ( matt]1 & ultimately leads1 z 9 ,mohamm$anism1 & 9 mod]n ,judaism & ,unit>ianism1 to ,pan!ism4 8,love is an impossible ex]cise to a solit>y be+40 ,)\t ,tr9ity we _c hold to a liv+ ,unity 9 ! ,godhead4 ,brit4 & ,=4 ,evang4 ,rev41 ,jan4 #ahhb3ce-fc--8,! problem is to f9d a p]fect objective1 congru\s & fitt+1 = a p]fect intellig5ce1 & ! answ] is3 #8a p]fect intellig5ce4' 0 ,! au?or ( ?is article quotes ,james ,m>t9eau1 ! ,unit>ian philosoph]1 z foll[s3 8,!re is only "o res\rce left = complet+ ! ne$ful ,objectivity = ,god1 viz41 to admit 9 "s =m ! coval exi/5ce ( matt]1 z ! condition or m$ium ( ! div9e ag5cy or manife/ation4 ,fail+ ! pro( ( ! absolute orig9ation ( matt] we are left ) ! div9e cause1 & ! mat]ial condition ( all nature1 9 et]nal co-pres5ce & relation1 z supreme object & rudim5t>y object40 ,see also ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy1 #a3dje--8;,9 d5y+ t a plurality ( self-exi/5ces is possible1 ,i mean to speak only ( self-exi/5t causes4 ,a self-exi/5ce :i* is n a cause is by no means exclud$1 s f> z ,i c see1 by a self-exi/5ce :i* is a cause2 nay1 is ev5 requir$ = ! ex]cise ( its causality40 ,"h we see t ,m>t9eau's ,unit>ianism logically drove him into ,dualism4 ,b ,god's bless$ness1 ^u ?is pr9ciple1 requires n m]ely an et]nal univ]se b an inf9ite univ]se1 = no?+ less w af=d fit object = an inf9ite m9d4 ,yet a ,god :o is necess>ily b\nd to ! univ]se1 or by ^: side a univ]se1 :i* is n himself1 et]nally exi/s1 is n inf9ite1 indep5d5t1 or free4 ,! only exit f ?is difficulty is 9 d5y+ ,god's self-consci\sness & self-det]m9ation1 or 9 o!r words1 ex*ang+ our !ism = dualism1 & our dualism = pan!ism4 ,e4 ,h4 ,johnson1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,july1 #ahib3cgi1 quotes f ,ox5ham's ,ca?olic ,doctr9e ( ! ,atonem5t1 #ajh1 #aji--8;,=ty ye>s ago ,james ,m>t9eau wrote to ,george ,macdonald3 #8,nei!r my intellectual pref]5ce nor my moral admiration goes he>tily ) ! ,unit>ian h]oes1 sects or productions1 ( any age4 ,ebionites1 ,arians1 ,soc9ians1 all seem to me to contra/ unfavorably ) _! oppon5ts1 & to exhibit a type ( ?\ght f> less wor?y1 on ! :ole1 ( ! true g5ius ( ,*ri/ianity4' ,9 8 pap] entitl$ ,a ,way out ( ! ,unit>ian ,controv]sy1 ,m>t9eau says t ! ,unit>ian wor%ips ! ,fa!r2 ! ,tr9it>ian wor%ips ! ,son3 #8,b he :o is ! ,son 9 "o cre$ is ! ,fa!r 9 ! o!r4444 ,! two cre$s are agre$ 9 t :i* con/itutes ! pi? & k]nel ( bo?4 ,! ,fa!r is ,god 9 8 primeval ess5ce4 ,b ,god1 z manife/$1 is ! ,son4' 0 ,dr4 ,johnson adds3 8,s ,m>t9eau1 aft] a lifelong s]vice 9 a ,unit>ian pulpit & pr(essor%ip1 at l5g? publicly accepts = tru? ! sub/ance ( t doctr9e :i*1 9 common ) ! *ur*1 he has f\nd s pr(itable1 & tells ,unit>ians t !y & we alike wor%ip ! ,son1 because all t we "k ( ,god 0 reveal$ by act ( ! ,son40 ,aft] he _h rea*$ 8 eightie? ye>1 ,m>t9eau )drew f ! ,unit>ian body1 ?\gh he nev] =mally unit$ ) any ,tr9it>ian *ur*4 ,h4 ,c4 ,m9ton1 9 ,pr9ceton ,rev41 #aijc3fee-fei1 has quot$ "s ( ,m>t9eau's mo/ significant utt]ances1 su* z ! foll[+3 8,! great /r5g? ( ! or?odox doctr9e lies1 no d\bt1 9 ! appeal x makes to ! inw>d #8s5se ( s91'--t sad weight ^: burd5 oppresses e s]i\s s\l4 ,& ! great weakness ( ,unit>ianism has be5 its ins5sibility to ?is abid+ sorr[ ( ! human consci\sness4 ,b ! or?odox rem$y is surely ! mo/ t]rible ( all mi/akes1 viz41 to get rid ( ! burd51 by ?r[+ x on ,*ri/ or p]mitt+ him to take x4444 ,= myself ,i own t ! lit]ature to :i* ,i turn = ! nurture & inspiration ( ,fai?1 ,hope & ,love is almo/ exclusively ! product ( or?odox v]sions ( ! ,*ri/ian religion4 ,! ,hymns ( ! ,wesleys1 ! ,pray]s ( ! ,fri5ds1 ! ,m$itations ( ,law & ,taul]1 h a quick5+ & elevat+ p[] :i* ,i r>ely feel 9 ! books on our ,unit>ian %elves4444 ,yet ,i c less ?an ev] appropriate1 or ev5 intellectually excuse1 any di/9ctive article ( ! ,tr9it>ian s*eme ( salvation40 ,:iton1 ,gloria ,patri1 #bc-bf1 seeks to reconcile ! two =ms ( belief by ass]t+ t 8bo? ,tr9it>ians & ,unit>ians are com+ to reg>d human nature z ess5tially "o ) ! div9e4 ,! ,nic5e ,fa!rs build$ bett] ?an !y knew1 :5 !y decl>$ ,*ri/ homo\sios ) ! ,fa!r4 ,we ass]t ! same ( mank9d40 ,b "h ,:iton goes beyond ! w>rant ( ,scripture4 ,( none b ! only begott5 ,son c x be said t be=e ,abraham 0 born he 01 & t 9 him dwelle? all ! fulness ( ! ,godhead bodily 7,john #h3eg2 ,col4 #b3i74 ,unit>ianism has repeat$ly demon/rat$ its logical insuffici5cy by ?is 8facilis desc5sus ,av]no10 ?is lapse f !ism into pan!ism4 ,9 ,new ,engl& ! high ,arianism ( ,*ann+ deg5]at$ into ! half-fl$g$ pan!ism ( ,!odore ,p>k]1 & ! full-fl$g$ pan!ism ( ,ralph ,waldo ,em]son4 ,mod]n ,judaism is pan!i/ic 9 its philosophy1 & su* also 0 ! lat] ,arabic philosophy ( ,mohamm$anism4 ,s+le p]sonality is felt to be insuffici5t to ! m9d's conception ( ,absolute ,p]fection4 ,we %r9k f ! ?\ght ( an et]nally lonely ,god4 8,we take refuge 9 ! t]m #8,godhead4' ,! lit]ati f9d relief 9 speak+ ( #8! gods4' 0 ,twe/5 7translat$ 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #c3ejb7--8,!re may be 9 poly!ism an elem5t ( tru?1 ?\gh disfigur$ & misund]/ood4 ,john ( ,damascus boa/$ t ! ,*ri/ian ,tr9ity /ood midway betwe5 ! ab/ract mono!ism ( ! ,jews & ! idolatr\s poly!ism ( ! ,greeks40 ,twe/51 quot$ 9 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ology1 #a3bee--8,!re is a 9 ,god4 ,tr9ity does n contradict ,unity1 b only t solit>9ess :i* is inconsi/5t ) ! liv+ pl5itude & bless$ness ascrib$ to ,god 9 ,scripture1 & :i* ,god possesses 9 himself & indep5d5tly ( ! f9ite40 ,%$d himself rem>ks3 8,! attempt ( ! ,dei/ & ! ,soc9ian to con/ruct ! doctr9e ( div9e ,unity is a failure1 because x fails to con/ruct ! doctr9e ( ! div9e ,p]sonality4 ,x cont5ds by implication t ,god c be self-kn[+ z a s+le subject m]ely1 )\t an object2 )\t ! di/9ctions involv$ 9 ! subject contemplat+1 ! object contemplat$1 & ! p]ception ( ! id5tity ( bo?40 ,mason1 ,fai? ( ! ,gospel1 #ge--8;,god is no /]ile & motionless unit40 ,bp4 ,phillips ,brooks3 8,unit>ianism has got ! notion ( ,god z tight & individual z x is possible to make x1 & is dy+ ( its meagre ,deity40 ,unit>ianism is n ! doctr9e ( "o ,god--= ! ,tr9it>ian holds to ?is2 x is r ! unip]sonality ( ?is "o ,god4 ,! div9e nature dem&s ei!r an et]nal ,*ri/ or an et]nal creation4 ,dr4 ,cal?orp1 ! ,unit>ian1 ( ,syracuse1 !re=e consi/5tly decl>es t 8,nature & ,god are ! same40 ,x is ! old wor%ip ( ,baal & ,a%t>o?--! deification ( p[] & pleasure4 ,= 8,nature0 includes ev]y?+--all bad impulses z well z good4 ,:5 a man discov]s gravity1 he has n discov]$ ,god1 b only "o ( ! manife/ations ( ,god4 ,gordon1 ,*ri/ ( ,to-day1 #aab--8,! supreme div9ity ( ,jesus ,*ri/ is b ! sov]eign expression 9 human hi/ory ( ! great law ( diff]5ce 9 id5tity t runs ?r\gh ! entire univ]se & t has its home 9 ! he>t ( ! ,godhead40 ,ev5 ,james ,freeman ,cl>ke1 9 8 ,or?odoxy1 its ,tru?s & ,errors1 #dcf1 admits t 8!re is an ess5tial tru? hidd5 9 ! idea ( ! ,tr9ity4 ,:ile ! *ur* doctr9e1 9 e =m :i* x has tak51 has fail$ to satisfy ! human intellect1 ! human he>t has clung to ! sub/ance conta9$ 9 !m all40 ,william ,adams ,br[n3 8,if ,god is by nature love1 he mu/ be by nature social4 ,fa!rhood & ,son%ip mu/ be imman5t 9 him4 ,9 him ! limitations ( f9ite p]sonality are remov$40 ,b ,dr4 ,br[n wrongly adds3 8,n ! my/]ies ( ,god's be+1 z he is 9 himself1 b z he is reveal$1 are op5$ to u 9 ?is doctr9e40 ,simil>ly ,p4 ,s4 ,moxom3 8,i d n "k h[ x is possible to pr$icate any moral quality ( a p]son :o is absolutely out ( relation to o!r p]sons4 ,if ,god 7 conceiv$ ( z solit>y 9 ! univ]se1 he c\ld n be *>act]iz$ z righte\s40 ,b ,dr4 ,moxom errone\sly ?9ks t ^! o!r moral p]sonalities mu/ be outside ( ,god4 ,we ma9ta9 t righte\sness1 l love1 requires only plurality ( p]sons )9 ! ,god-head4 ,see ,?omasius1 ,*ri/i ,p]son und ,w]k1 #a3aje1 #aef4 ,= ! pan!i/ic view1 see ,/rauss1 ,glaub5slehre1 #a3dfb-ebd4 ,w4 ,l4 ,walk]1 ,*ri/ian ,!ism1 #cag1 quotes ,dr4 ,paul ,c>us1 ,prim] ( ,philosophy1 #aja--8,we _c ev5 conceive ( ,god )\t attribut+ tr9ity to him4 ,an absolute unity w\ld be non-exi/5ce4 ,god1 if ?\ght ( z real & active1 involves an anti!sis1 :i* may be =mulat$ z ,god & ,_w1 or natura naturans & natura naturata1 or 9 "s o!r way4 ,?is anti!sis implies already ! tr9ity-conception4 ,:5 we ?9k ( ,god1 n only z t :i* is et]nal & immutable 9 exi/5ce1 b also z t :i* *anges1 gr[s1 & evolves1 we _c escape ! result & we mu/ progress to a triune ,god-idea4 ,! conception ( a ,god-man1 ( a ,savior1 ( ,god reveal$ 9 evolution1 br+s out ! anti!sis ( ,god ,fa!r & ,god ,son1 & ! v conception ( ?is relation implies ,god ! ,_s t proce$s f bo?40 ,?is confession ( an economic ,tr9ity is a rational "o only z x implies a ,tr9ity imman5t & et]nal4 ,b4 ,x is ess5tial to any prop] revelation4 ,if !re be no ,tr9ity1 ,*ri/ is n ,god1 & _c p]fectly "k or reveal ,god4 ,*ri/ianity is no long] ! "o1 all-inclusive1 & f9al revelation1 b only "o ( _m conflict+ & compet+ sy/ems1 ea* ( :i* has its portion ( tru?1 b also its portion ( error4 ,s too ) ! ,holy ,_s4 8,z ,god c be reveal$ only ?r\gh ,god1 s also c he be appropriat$ only ?r\gh ,god4 ,if ! ,holy ,_s be n ,god1 !n ! love & self-communication ( ,god to ! human s\l are n a reality40 ,9 o!r words1 )\t ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity we g back to m]e natural religion & ! f>-(f ,god ( deism1--& ?is is ultimately ex*ang$ = pan!ism 9 ! way already m5tion$4 ,m>t5s51 ,dogmatics1 #ajd2 ,?omasius1 ,*ri/i ,p]son und ,w]k1 #aef4 ,if ,*ri/ be n ,god1 he _c p]fectly "k himself1 & 8 te/imony to himself has no indep5d5t au?ority4 ,9 pray] ! ,*ri/ian has practical evid5ce ( ! ,tr9ity1 & c see ! value ( ! doctr9e2 = he comes to ,god ! ,fa!r1 plead+ ! "n ( ,*ri/1 & taught h[ to pray aright by ! ,holy ,_s4 ,x is impossible to id5tify ! ,fa!r ) ei!r ! ,son or ! ,_s4 ,see ,rom4 #h3bg--8;he t se>*e? ! he>ts i4 e41 ,god kn[e? :at is ! m9d ( ! ,_s1 because he make? int]cession = ! sa9ts accord+ to ! w ( ,god40 ,see also ,godet on ,john #a3ah--8,no man ha? se5 ,god at any "t2 ! only begott5 ,son1 :o is 9 ! bosom ( ! ,fa!r1 he ha? decl>$ him02 notice "h ! relation betwe5 & 4 ,napoleon ,i3 8,*ri/ianity says ) simplicity1 #8,no man ha? se5 ,god1 except ,god4' 0 ,john #af3ae--8;,all ?+s :atsoev] ! ,fa!r ha? are m9e3 !re=e said ,i1 t he take? ( m9e1 & %all decl>e x unto y02 "h ,*ri/ claims = himself all t belongs to ,god1 & !n decl>es t ! ,holy ,_s %all reveal him4 ,only a div9e ,_s c d ?is1 ev5 z only a div9e ,*ri/ c put out an unpresumptu\s h& to take all t belongs to ! ,fa!r4 ,see also ,we/cott1 on ,john #ad3i--8;he t ha? se5 me ha? se5 ! ,fa!r2 h[ saye/ ?\1 ,%[ u ! ,fa!r80 ,! agno/ic is p]fectly correct 9 8 conclusions1 if !re be no ,*ri/1 no m$ium ( communication1 no pr9ciple ( revelation 9 ! ,godhead4 ,only ! ,son has reveal$ ! ,fa!r4 ,ev5 ,royce1 9 8 ,_s ( ,mod]n ,philosophy1 speaks ( ! exi/5ce ( an inf9ite ,self1 or ,logos1 or ,_w-m9d1 ( :i* all individual m9ds are p>ts or bits1 & ( ^: timeless *oice we p>take4 ,"s su* pr9ciple 9 ! div9e nature mu/ be assum$1 if ,*ri/ianity is ! complete & suffici5t revelation ( ,god's w to m54 ,! ,unit>ian view reg>ds ! religion ( ,*ri/ z only 8"o ( ! day's works ( humanity0--an evanesc5t mom5t 9 ! ceaseless advance ( ! race4 ,! ,*ri/ian on ! o!r h& reg>ds ,*ri/ z ! only ,reveal] ( ,god1 ! only ,god ) :om we h to d1 ! f9al au?ority 9 religion1 ! s\rce ( all tru? & ! judge ( all mank9d4 8,heav5 & e>? %all pass away1 b my words %all n pass away0 7,mat4 #bd3ce74 ,! resurrection ( j & unju/ %all be 8 "w 7,john #e3bh71 & future retribution %all be 8! wra? ( ! ,lamb0 7,rev4 #f3af74 ,s9ce ,god nev] ?9ks1 says1 or does any ?+1 except ?r\gh ,*ri/1 & s9ce ,*ri/ does 8 "w 9 human he>ts only ?r\gh ! ,holy ,_s1 we may conclude t ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity is ess5tial to any prop] revelation4 ,c4 ,x is ess5tial to any prop] r$emption4 ,if ,god be absolutely & simply "o1 !re c be no m$iation or atonem5t1 s9ce betwe5 ,god & ! mo/ exalt$ creature ! gulf is inf9ite4 ,*ri/ _c br+ u ne>] to ,god ?an he is himself4 ,only "o :o is ,god c reconcile u to ,god4 ,s1 too1 only "o :o is ,god c purify our s\ls4 ,a ,god :o is only unity1 b 9 :om is no plurality1 may be our ,judge1 b1 s f> z we c see1 _c be our ,savior or our ,sanctifi]4 8,god is ! way to himself40 8,no?+ human holds good be=e ,god1 & no?+ b ,god himself c satisfy ,god40 ,! be/ me?od ( argu+ ) ,unit>ians1 !re=e1 is to r\se ! s5se ( s92 = ! s\l t has any prop] conviction ( its s9s feels t only an inf9ite ,r$eem] c ev] save x4 ,on ! o!r h&1 a slight e/imate ( s9 is logically connect$ ) a l[ view ( ! dignity ( ,*ri/4 ,twe/51 translat$ 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #c3eaj--8;,x w\ld seem to be n a m]e accid5t t ,pelagianism1 :5 logically c>ri$ out1 z = example among ! ,soc9ians1 has also always l$ to ,unit>ianism40 ,9 ! rev]se ord]1 too1 x is manife/ t rejection ( ! deity ( ,*ri/ mu/ t5d to r5d] m sup]ficial m5's views ( ! s9 & guilt & puni%m5t f :i* ,*ri/ came to save !m1 & ) ?is to dead5 religi\s feel+ & to cut ! s9ews ( all evangeli/ic & mission>y ef=t 7,john #ab3dd2 ,heb4 #aj3bf74 ,see ,ar?ur1 on ! ,div9ity ( our ,"l 9 relation to 8 "w ( ,atonem5t1 9 ,pres5t ,day ,tracts1 #f3 no4 #ce2 ,ellis1 quot$ by ,watson1 ,!ol4 ,in/41 #bc2 ,gunsaulus1 ,transfig4 ( ,*ri/1 #ac--8,we h tri$ to see ,god 9 ! light ( nature1 :ile he said3 #8,9 ?y light %all we see light' 7,ps4 #cf3i740 ,we %\ld see nature 9 ! light ( ,*ri/4 ,et]nal life is atta9$ only ?r\gh ! k ( ,god 9 ,*ri/ 7,john #af3i74 ,h5ce to accept ,*ri/ is to accept ,god2 to reject ,*ri/ is to turn "o's back on ,god3 ,john #ab3dd--8;,he t believe? on me1 believe? n on me1 b on him t s5t me02 ,heb4 #aj3bf1 #bi--8!re rema9e? no m a sacrifice = s9 444 = him :o ha? trodd5 "u foot ! ,son ( ,god40 ,9 ,! ,he>t ( ,midlo?ian1 ,jeanie ,deans goes to ,london to secure p>don = h] si/]4 ,%e _c 9 h] peasant attire g direct to ! ,k+1 = he w n receive h]4 ,%e goes to a ,scot* h\sekeep] 9 ,london2 ?r\gh him to ! ,duke ( ,argyle2 ?r\gh him to ! ,que52 ?r\gh ! ,que5 %e gets p>don f ! ,k+1 :om %e nev] sees4 ,?is 0 m$ival m$iator%ip4 ,b n[ we come directly to ,*ri/1 & ?is suffices u1 because he is himself ,god 7,! ,outlook74 ,a man once w5t into ! cell ( a convict$ murd]]1 at ! reque/ ( ! murd]]'s wife & plead$ ) him to confess 8 crime & accept ,*ri/1 b ! murd]] refus$4 ,! seem+ cl]gyman 0 ! ,gov]nor1 ) a p>don :i* he _h design$ to be/[ 9 case he f\nd ! murd]] p5it5t4 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #hf--8;,i h he>d t1 dur+ our ,civil ,w>1 a swagg]+1 drunk51 blasphem+ (fic] insult$ & almo/ drove f ! dock at ,alex&ria1 a pla9 un(f5d+ man 9 citiz5's dress2 b ,i h also he>d t t same (fic] turn$ pale1 fell on 8 knees1 & begg$ = m]cy1 :5 ! pla9 man dem&$ 8 sword1 put him "u arre/ & made himself kn[n z ,g5]al ,grant4 ,s we may abuse & reject ! ,"l ,jesus ,*ri/1 & fancy t we c ignore 8 claims & disobey 8 comm&s ) impunity2 b x w seem a m s]i\s ?+ :5 we f9d at ! la/ t he :om we h abus$ & reject$ is none o!r ?an ! liv+ ,god be=e ^: judgm5t b> we are to /&40 ,h5ry ,b4 ,smi? began life "u ,unit>ian influ5ces1 & _h /rong prejudices aga9/ evangelical doctr9e1 especially ! doctr9es ( human depravity & ( ! div9ity ( ,*ri/4 ,9 8 ,s5ior ye> 9 ,college he 0 conv]t$4 ,cyrus ,haml9 says3 8,i reg>d ,smi?'s conv]sion z ! mo/ rem>kable ev5t 9 ,college 9 my day40 ,d\bts ( depravity vani%$ ) "o glimpse into 8 own he>t2 & d\bts ab\t ,*ri/'s div9ity c\ld n hold _! own aga9/ ! confession3 8,( "o ?+ ,i feel assur$3 ,i ne$ an inf9ite ,savior40 ,"h is ! ultimate /r5g? ( ,tr9it>ian doctr9e4 ,:5 ! ,holy ,_s conv9ces a man ( 8 s91 & br+s him face to face ) ! outrag$ hol9ess & love ( ,god1 he is mov$ to cry f ! dep?s ( 8 s\l3 8,none b an inf9ite ,savior c ev] save me60 ,only 9 a div9e ,*ri/--,*ri/ = u ^u ! ,cross1 & ,*ri/ 9 u by 8 ,_s--c ! convict$ s\l f9d peace & re/4 ,& s e revival ( true religion gives a new impulse to ! ,tr9it>ian doctr9e4 ,h5ry ,b4 ,smi? wrote 9 8 lat] life3 8,:5 ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity 0 ab&on$1 o!r articles ( ! fai?1 su* z ! atonem5t & reg5]ation1 h almo/ always foll[$1 by logical necessity1 z1 :5 "o draws ! wire f a necklace ( gems1 ! gems all fall asund]40 ,d4 ,x is ess5tial to any prop] model = human life4 ,if !re be no ,tr9ity imman5t 9 ! div9e nature1 !n ,fa!rhood 9 ,god has _h a beg9n+ & x may h an end2 ,son%ip1 moreov]1 is no long] a p]fection1 b an imp]fection1 orda9$ = a tempor>y purpose4 ,b if fa!rly giv+ & filial receiv+ are et]nal 9 ,god1 !n ! law ( love requires ( u con=mity to ,god 9 bo? ^! respects z ! highe/ dignity ( our be+4 ,see ,hutton1 ,essays1 #a3bcb--8,! ,tr9ity tells u some?+ ( ,god's absolute & ess5tial nature2 n simply :at he is to u1 b :at he is 9 himself4 ,if ,*ri/ is ! et]nal ,son ( ! ,fa!r1 ,god is inde$ & 9 ess5ce a ,fa!r2 ! social nature1 ! spr+ ( love is ( ! v ess5ce ( ! et]nal ,be+2 ! communication ( life1 ! reciprocation ( affection dates f beyond "t1 belongs to ! v be+ ( ,god4 ,! ,unit>ian idea ( a solit>y ,god pr(\ndly affects our conception ( ,god1 r$uces x to m]e p[]1 id5tifies ,god ) ab/ract cause & ?\ght4 ,love is gr\nd$ 9 p[]1 n p[] 9 love4 ,! ,fa!r is m]g$ 9 ! omnisci5t & omnipot5t g5ius ( ! univ]se40 ,h5ce #a ,john #b3bc--8,:osoev] d5ie? ! ,son1 ! same ha? n ! ,fa!r40 ,d',arcy1 ,idealism & ,!ology1 #bjd--8;,if ,god be simply "o great p]son1 !n we h to ?9k ( him z wait+ until ! :ole process ( creation has be5 accompli%$ be=e 8 love c f9d an object ^u :i* to be/[ itself4 ,8 love belongs1 9 t case1 n to 8 inmo/ ess5ce1 b to 8 relation to "s ( 8 creatures4 ,! words #8,god is love' 7#a ,john #d3h7 become a rhetorical exagg]ation1 r ?an ! expression ( a tru? ab\t ! div9e nature40 ,hutton1 ,essays1 #a3bci--8,we ne$ also ! inspiration & help ( a p]fect filial w4 ,we _c conceive ( ! ,fa!r z %>+ 9 t dep5d5t attitude ( _s :i* is our *ief spiritual want4 ,x is a ,fa!r's p]fection to orig9ate--a ,son's to receive4 ,we ne$ sympa?y & aid 9 ?is receptive life2 h5ce1 ! help ( ! true ,son4 ,humility1 self-sacrifice1 submission1 are heav5ly1 et]nal1 div9e4 ,*ri/'s filial life to ! root ( all filial life 9 u4 ,see ,gal4 #b3ai1 #bj--#8;x is no long] ,i t live1 b ,*ri/ live? 9 me3 & t life :i* ,i n[ live 9 ! fle% ,i live 9 fai?1 ! fai? :i* is 9 ! ,son ( ,god1 :o lov$ me1 & gave himself up = me4'0 ,?omas ,ersk9e ( ,l9la!n1 ,! ,spiritual ,ord]1 #bcc--8,!re is no?+ degrad+ 9 ?is dep5d5ce1 = we %>e x ) ! et]nal ,son40 ,gore1 ,inc>nation1 #afb--8;,god c limit himself by ! conditions ( manhood1 because ! ,godhead conta9s 9 itself et]nally ! prototype ( human self-sacrifice & self-limitation1 = ,god is love40 ,on ! practical lessons & uses ( ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity1 see ,presb4 & ,ref4 ,rev41 ,oct #aijb3ebd-eej--;art4 by ,r4 ,m4 ,edg>2 also s]mon by ,ganse1 9 ,s\? ,*ur* ,lectures1 #cjj-caj4 ,on ! doctr9e 9 g5]al1 see ,robie1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #bg3bfb-bhi2 ,pease1 ,philosophy ( ,tr9it>ian ,doctr9e2 ,n4 ,w4 ,taylor1 ,reveal$ ,!ology1 #a3acc2 ,s*ultz1 ,lehre von d] ,got!it ,*ri/i4 ,on hea!n tr9ities1 see ,bib4 ,repos41 #f3aaf2 ,*ri/lieb1 ,mod4 ,d\bt & ,*ri/ian ,belief1 #bff1 #bfg--8,lao-tse says1 #fjj ,b4 ,c41 #8,tao1 ! intellig5t pr9ciple ( all be+1 is by nature "o2 ! fir/ begat ! second2 bo? toge!r begat ! ?ird2 ^! ?ree made all ?+s4' 0 ,! ,egyptian triad ( ,abydos 0 ,osiris1 ,isis 8 wife1 & ,horus _! ,son4 ,b ^! 7 no true p]sons2 = n only did ! ,son proce$ f ! ,fa!r1 b ! ,fa!r proce$$ f ! ,son2 ! ,egyptian tr9ity 0 pan!i/ic 9 its mean+4 ,see ,r5\f1 ,hibb]t ,lectures1 #bi2 ,rawl9son1 ,religions ( ! ,anci5t ,_w1 #df1 #dg4 ,! ,tr9ity ( ! ,v$as 0 ,dyaus1 ,indra1 ,agni4 ,d]iv$ f ! ?ree dim5sions ( space8 ,or f ! family--fa!r1 "m1 son8 ,man creates ,god 9 8 own image1 & sees family life 9 ! ,godhead8 ,! ,brahman ,trimurti or ,tr9ity1 to ! memb]s ( :i* are giv5 ! names ,brahma1 ,vi%nu1 ,siva--s\rce1 support]1 end--is a p]sonification ( ! pan!i/ic ,all1 :i* dwells equally 9 good & evil1 9 god & man4 ,! ?ree are repres5t$ 9 ! ?ree my/ic lett]s ( ! syllable ,om1 or ,aum1 & by ! image at ,elephanta ( ?ree heads & "o body2 see ,h>dwick1 ,*ri/ & ,o!r ,ma/]s1 #a3bgf4 ,! places ( ! ?ree are int]*angeable4 ,williams3 8,9 ! ?ree p]sons ! "o ,god is %[n2 ,ea* fir/ 9 place1 ea* la/1 n "o alone2 ,( ,siva1 ,vi%nu1 ,brahma1 ea* may be1 ,fir/1 second1 ?ird1 among ! bless$ ?ree40 ,!re are t5 inc>nations ( ,vi%nu = m5's salvation 9 v>i\s times ( ne$2 & ! "o ,_s :i* tempor>ily inve/s itself ) ! qualities ( matt] is r$uc$ to its orig9al ess5ce at ! end ( ! on 7,kalpa74 ,?is is only a gross] =m ( ,sabellianism1 or ( a modal ,tr9ity4 ,accord+ to ,r5\f x is n old] ?an ,a4 ,d4 #adjj4 ,buddhism 9 lat] times _h its triad4 ,buddha1 or ,intellig5ce1 ! fir/ pr9ciple1 associat$ ) ,dh>ma1 or ,law1 ! pr9ciple ( matt]1 ?r\gh ! comb9+ influ5ce ( ,sangha1 or ,ord]1 ! m$iat+ pr9ciple4 ,see ,kellogg1 ,! ,light ( ,asia & ! ,light ( ! ,_w1 #ahd1 #cee4 ,x is probably f a ,*ri/ian s\rce4 ,! ,greek tr9ity 0 compos$ ( ,zeus1 ,a!na1 & ,apollo4 ,apollo or ,loxias 77 utt]s ! decisions ( ,zeus4 8,^! ?ree surpass all ! o!r gods 9 moral "* & 9 provid5tial c>e ov] ! univ]se4 ,!y su/a9 su* intimate & ende>+ relations to ea* o!r1 t !y may be said to #8agree 9 "o' 02 see ,tyl]1 ,!ol4 ( ,greek ,poets1 #agj1 #aga2 ,glad/one1 ,/udies ( ,hom]1 vol4 #b1 sec4 #b4 ,yet ! ,greek tr9ity1 :ile x gives u ?ree p]sons1 does n give u on5ess ( ess5ce4 ,x is a sy/em ( tri!ism4 ,plot9us1 #cjj ,a4 ,d41 gives u a philosophical ,tr9ity 9 8 1 1 4 ,watts1 ,new ,apologetic1 #aie--,! hea!n tr9ities are 8residu>y fragm5ts ( ! lo/ k ( ,god1 n diff]5t /ages 9 a process ( !ological evolution1 b evid5ce ( a moral & spiritual degradation40 ,john ,caird1 ,fund4 ,ideas ( ,*ri/ianity1 #ib--8;,9 ! ,v$as ! v>i\s individual div9ities are sep>at$ by no h>d & fa/ di/9ction f ea* o!r4 ,!y are only names = "o indivisible :ole1 ( :i* ! p>ticul> div9ity invok$ at any "o "t is ! type or repres5tative4 ,!re is a lat5t recognition ( a unity b5ea? all ! multiplicity ( ! objects ( adoration4 ,! p]sonal or an?ropomorphic elem5t is nev] employ$ z x is 9 ! ,greek & ,roman my?ology4 ,! p]sonality ascrib$ to ,mitra or ,v>una or ,indra or ,agni is sc>cely m real ?an our mod]n smil+ heav5 or :isp]+ breeze or sull5 moan+ re/less sea4 #8,!re is b "o1' !y say1 #8?\gh ! poets call him by diff]5t names4' ,! all-embrac+ heav51 mighty nature1 is ! reality beh9d ea* ( ^! p>tial manife/ations4 ,! pan!i/ic elem5t :i* 0 implicit 9 ! ,v$ic phase ( ,indian religion becomes explicit 9 ,brahmanism1 & 9 p>ticul> 9 ! s-call$ ,indian sy/ems ( philosophy & 9 ! great ,indian epic poems4 ,!y seek to f9d 9 ! flux & v>iety ( ?+s ! p]man5t und]ly+ ess5ce4 ,t is ,brahma4 ,s ,sp9oza s\ght re/ 9 ! "o et]nal sub/ance1 & he wi%$ to look at all ?+s #8"u ! =m ( et]nity4' ,all ?+s & be+s are =ms ( "o :ole1 ( ! inf9ite sub/ance :i* we call ,god40 ,see also ,l4 ,l4 ,pa9e1 ,e?nic ,tr9ities4 ,! grop+s ( ! hea!n religions aft] a tr9ity 9 ,god1 toge!r ) _! inability to con/ruct a consi/5t s*eme ( x1 are evid5ce ( a rational want 9 human nature :i* only ! ,*ri/ian doctr9e is able to supply4 ,?is p[] to satisfy ! inmo/ ne$s ( ! believ] is pro( ( its tru?4 ,we close our treatm5t ) ! words ( ,j]emy ,taylor3 8,he :o goes ab\t to speak ( ! my/]y ( ! ,tr9ity1 & does x by words & names ( man's inv5tion1 talk+ ( ess5ce & exi/5ces1 hypo/ases & p]sonalities1 priority 9 coquality1 & unity 9 pluralities1 may amuse himself & build a tab]nacle 9 8 head1 & talk some?+--he kn[s n :at2 b ! r5ew$ man1 t feels ! p[] ( ! ,fa!r1 to :om ! ,son is become wisdom1 sanctification1 & r$emption1 9 ^: he>t ! love ( ! ,_s ( ,god is %$ abroad--?is man1 ?\gh he und]/& no?+ ( :at is un9telligible1 yet he alone truly und]/&s ! ,*ri/ian doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity40 ,*apt] ,,iii4 ,! ,decrees ,( ,god4 ,i4 ,def9ition ( ,decrees4 ,by ! decrees ( ,god we mean t et]nal plan by :i* ,god has r5d]$ c]ta9 all ! ev5ts ( ! univ]se1 pa/1 pres5t1 & future4 ,notice 9 explanation t3 7a7 ,! decrees are _m only to our f9ite compreh5sion2 9 _! own nature !y are b "o plan1 :i* embraces n only effects b also causes1 n only ! ends to be secur$ b also ! means ne$ful to secure !m4 ,9 ,rom4 #h3bh--8;call$ accord+ to 8 purpose0--! _m decrees = ! salvation ( _m individuals are repres5t$ z =m+ b "o purpose ( ,god4 ,eph4 #a3aa--8;=eorda9$ accord+ to ! purpose ( him :o worke? all ?+s aft] ! c\nsel ( 8 w0--notice aga9 ! ^w 8purpose10 9 ! s+ul>4 ,eph4 #c3aa--8;accord+ to ! et]nal purpose :i* he purpos$ 9 ,*ri/ ,jesus our ,"l40 ,?is "o purpose or plan ( ,god includes bo? means & ends1 pray] & its answ]1 labor & its fruit4 ,tyrolese prov]b3 8,god has 8 plan = e man40 ,e man1 z well z ,jean ,paul1 is 8d] ,e9zige0--! unique4 ,!re is a s+le plan :i* embraces all ?+s2 8we use ! ^w #8decree' :5 we ?9k ( x p>titively0 7,pepp]74 ,see ,hodge1 ,outl9es ( ,!ology1 #a/ ed41 #afe2 #b;d ed41 #bjj--8;,9 fact1 no ev5t is isolat$--to det]m9e "o involves det]m9ation ( ! :ole concat5ation ( causes & effects :i* con/itutes ! univ]se40 ,! ^w 8plan0 is pref]able to ! ^w 8decrees10 because 8plan0 excludes ! ideas ( 7#a7 plurality1 7#b7 %ort-sight$ness1 7#c7 arbitr>9ess1 7#d7 compulsion4 7b7 ,! decrees1 z ! et]nal act ( an inf9itely p]fect w1 ?\gh !y h logical relations to ea* o!r1 h no *ronological relation4 ,!y are n !re=e ! result ( delib]ation1 9 any s5se t implies %ort-sight$ness or hesitancy4 ,logically1 9 ,god's decree ! sun prec$es ! sunlight1 & ! decree to br+ into be+ a fa!r prec$es ! decree t !re %all be a son4 ,god decrees man be=e he decrees man's act2 he decrees ! creation ( man be=e he decrees man's exi/5ce4 ,b !re is no *ronological succession4 8,c\nsel0 9 ,eph4 #a3aa--8! c\nsel ( 8 w0--means1 n delib]ation1 b wisdom4 7c7 ,s9ce ! w 9 :i* ! decrees h _! orig9 is a free w1 ! decrees are n a m]ely in/9ctive or necess>y ex]cise ( ! div9e intellig5ce or volition1 su* z pan!ism supposes4 ,x belongs to ! p]fection ( ,god t he h a plan1 & ! be/ possible plan4 ,"h is no necessity1 b only ! c]ta9ty t inf9ite wisdom w act wisely4 ,god's decrees are n ,god2 !y are n id5tical ) 8 ess5ce2 !y d n fl[ f 8 be+ 9 ! same necess>y way 9 :i* ! et]nal ,son proce$s f ! et]nal ,fa!r4 ,!re is free w 9 ,god1 :i* acts ) inf9ite c]ta9ty1 yet )\t necessity4 ,to call ev5 ! decree ( salvation necess>y is to d5y grace1 & to make an unfree ,god4 ,see ,dick1 ,lectures on ,!ology1 #a3cee2 lect4 #cd4 7d7 ,! decrees h ref]5ce to ?+s outside ( ,god4 ,god does n decree to be holy1 nor to exi/ z ?ree p]sons 9 "o ess5ce4 ,decrees are ! prep>ation = ext]nal ev5ts--! embrac+ ( c]ta9 ?+s & acts 9 a plan4 ,!y d n include ^? processes & op]ations )9 ! ,godhead :i* h no ref]5ce to ! univ]se4 7e7 ,! decrees prim>ily respect ! acts ( ,god himself1 9 ,creation1 ,provid5ce1 & ,grace2 second>ily1 ! acts ( free creatures1 :i* he =esees w result !refrom4 ,:ile we d5y ! ass]tion ( ,:$on1 t 8! div9e plan embraces only div9e actions10 we grant t ,god's plan has ref]5ce prim>ily to 8 own actions1 & t ! s9ful acts ( m51 9 p>ticul>1 are ! objects1 n ( a decree t ,god w effici5tly produce !m1 b ( a decree t ,god w p]mit m51 9 ! ex]cise ( _! own free w1 to produce !m4 7f7 ,! decree to act is n ! act4 ,! decrees are an int]nal ex]cise & manife/ation ( ! div9e attributes1 & are n to be conf\nd$ ) ,creation1 ,provid5ce1 & ,r$emption1 :i* are ! execution ( ! decrees4 ,! decrees are ! fir/ op]ation ( ! attributes1 & ! fir/ manife/ation ( p]sonality ( :i* we h any k )9 ! ,godhead4 ,!y presuppose ^? ess5tial acts or movem5ts )9 ! div9e nature :i* we call g5]ation & procession4 ,!y involve by way ( consequ5ce t execution ( ! decrees :i* we call ,creation1 ,provid5ce1 & ,r$emption1 b !y are n to be conf\nd$ ) ei!r ( ^!4 7g7 ,! decrees are !re=e n address$ to creatures2 are n ( ! nature ( /atute law2 & lay nei!r compulsion nor obligation ^u ! wills ( m54 ,s ord]+ ! univ]se t m5 w pursue a giv5 c\rse ( action is a v diff]5t ?+ f decl>+1 ord]+1 or comm&+ t !y %all4 8,our acts are 9 accordance ) ! decrees1 b n necess>ily s--we c d o!rwise & (t5 %\ld0 7,p>k74 ,! ,fr5*man :o fell into ! wat] & cri$3 8,i w1 dr[n1--no "o %all help me60 0 v naturally p]mitt$ to dr[n2 if he _h said3 8,i %all dr[n1--no "o w help me60 he might p]*ance h call$ "s fri5dly p]son to 8 aid4 7h7 ,all human acts1 :e!r evil or good1 ent] into ! div9e plan & s are objects ( ,god's decrees1 al?\gh ,god's actual ag5cy ) reg>d to ! evil is only a p]missive ag5cy4 ,no decree ( ,god reads3 8,y %all s940 ,= 7#a7 no decree is address$ to y2 7#b7 no decree ) respect to y says %all2 7#c7 ,god _c cause s91 or decree to cause x4 ,he simply decrees to create1 & himself to act1 9 su* a way t y w1 ( y\r own free *oice1 commit s94 ,god det]m9es ^u 8 own acts1 =esee+ :at ! results w be 9 ! free acts ( 8 creatures1 & s he det]m9es ^? results4 ,?is p]missive decree is ! only decree ( ,god ) respect to s94 ,man ( himself is capable ( produc+ s94 ,( himself he is n capable ( produc+ hol9ess4 ,9 ! production ( hol9ess two p[]s mu/ concur1 ,god's w & man's w1 & ,god's w mu/ act fir/4 ,! decree ( good1 !re=e1 is n simply a p]missive decree1 z 9 ! case ( evil4 ,god's decree1 9 ! =m] case1 is a decree to br+ to be> positive ag5cies = its production1 su* z circum/ances1 motives1 influ5ces ( 8 ,_s4 ,b1 9 ! case ( evil1 ,god's decrees are simply 8 arrangem5t t man may d z he pleases1 ,god all ! :ile =esee+ ! result4 ,p]missive ag5cy %\ld n be conf\nd$ ) conditional ag5cy1 nor p]missive decree ) conditional decree4 ,god =eorda9$ s9 only indirectly4 ,! ma*9e is con/ruct$ n = ! sake ( ! friction1 b 9 spite ( x4 ,9 ! p>able ,mat4 #ac3bd-cj1 ! "q 8,:5ce !n ha? x t>es80 is answ]$1 n by say+1 8,i decre$ ! t>es40 b by say+3 8,an enemy ha? done ?is40 ,yet we mu/ take exception to ,pr9cipal ,fairbairn1 ,place ( ,*ri/ 9 ,!ology1 #def1 :5 he says3 8,god did n p]mit s9 to be2 x is1 9 its ess5ce1 ! transgression ( 8 law1 & s 8 only attitude t[>d x is "o ( opposition4 ,x is1 because man has contradict$ & resi/$ 8 w40 ,"h ! tru? ( ,god's opposition to s9 is /at$ s %>ply z almo/ to d5y ! decree ( s9 9 any s5se4 ,we ma9ta9 t ,god does decree s9 9 ! s5se ( embrac+ 9 8 plan ! =ese5 transgressions ( m51 :ile at ! same "t we ma9ta9 t ^! =ese5 transgressions are *>geable :olly to m5 & n at all to ,god4 7i7 ,:ile ,god's total plan ) reg>d to creatures is call$ pr$e/9ation1 or =eord9ation1 8 purpose s to act t c]ta9 w believe & be sav$ is call$ election1 & 8 purpose s to act t c]ta9 w refuse to believe & be lo/ is call$ reprobation4 ,we discuss election & reprobation1 9 a lat] *apt]1 z a "p ( ! ,application ( ,r$emption4 ,god's decrees may be divid$ into decrees ) respect to nature1 & decrees ) respect to moral be+s4 ,^! la/ we call =eord9ation1 or pr$e/9ation2 & ( ^! decrees ) respect to moral be+s !re are two k9ds1 ! decree ( election1 & ! decree ( reprobation2 see our treatm5t ( ! doctr9e ( ,election4 ,george ,h]b]t3 8,we all ackn[l$ge bo? ?y p[] & love ,to be exact1 transc5d5t1 & div9e2 ,:o do/ s /rongly & s sweetly move4 ,:ile all ?+s h _! w--yet none b ?9e4 ,= ei!r ?y comm& or ?y p]mission ,lays h&s on all2 !y are ?y "r & left4 ,! fir/ puts on ) spe$ & exp$ition2 ,! o!r curbs s9's /eal+ pace & !ft4 ,no?+ escapes !m bo?2 all mu/ appe> ,& be dispos$ & dress$ & tun$ by !e ,:o sweetly temp]e/ all4 ,if we c\ld he> ,?y skill & art1 :at music x w\ld be60 ,on ! :ole doctr9e1 see ,%$d1 ,presb4 & ,ref4 ,rev41 ,jan4 #ahij3a-be4 ,,ii4 ,pro( ( ! ,doctr9e ( ,decrees4 #a4 ,f ,scripture4 ,a4 ,! ,scriptures decl>e t all ?+s are includ$ 9 ! div9e decrees4 ,b4 ,!y decl>e t special ?+s & ev5ts are decre$2 z1 = example1 7a7 ! /ability ( ! physical univ]se2 7b7 ! outw>d circum/ances ( nations2 7c7 ! l5g? ( human life2 7d7 ! mode ( our dea?2 7e7 ! free acts ( m51 bo? good acts & evil acts4 ,c4 ,!y decl>e t ,god has decre$ 7a7 ! salvation ( believ]s2 7b7 ! e/abli%m5t ( ,*ri/'s k+dom2 7c7 ! "w ( ,*ri/ & ( 8 p 9 e/abli%+ x4 ,a4 ,is4 #ad3bf1 #bg--8,?is is ! purpose t is purpos$ ^u ! :ole e>?2 & ?is is ! h& t is /ret*$ out ^u all ! nations2 = ,jehovah ( ho/s ha? purpos$ 444 & 8 h& is /ret*$ out1 & :o %all turn x back80 #df3aj1 #aa--8;decl>+ ! end f ! beg9n+1 & f anci5t times ! ?+s t are n yet done1 say+1 ,my c\nsel %all /&1 & ,i w d all my pleasure 444 yea1 ,i h spok51 ,i w also br+ x to pass2 ,i h purpos$1 ,i w also d x40 ,dan4 #d3ce--8;doe? accord+ to 8 w 9 ! army ( heav51 & among ! inhabitants ( ! e>?2 & none c /ay 8 h&1 or say unto him1 ,:at doe/ ?\80 ,eph4 #a3aa--8! purpose ( him :o worke? all ?+s aft] ! c\nsel ( 8 w40 ,b4 7a7 ,ps4 #aai3hi-ia--8;,= ev]1 ,o ,jehovah1 ?y ^w is settl$ 9 heav54 ,?y fai?fulness is unto all g5]ations3 ,?\ ha/ e/abli%$ ! e>? & x abide?4 ,!y abide ?is day accord+ to ?9e ord9ances2 ,= all ?+s are ?y s]vants40 7b7 ,acts #ag3bf--8;he made ( "o e nation ( m5 to dwell on all ! face ( ! e>?1 hav+ det]m9$ _! appo9t$ seasons1 & ! b\nds ( _! habitation02 cf4 ,za*4 #e3a--8;came f\r *>iots out f betwe5 two m\nta9s2 & ! m\nta9s 7 m\nta9s ( brass0--! fix$ decrees f :i* proce$ ,god's provid5tial deal+s8 7c7 ,job #ad3e--8,see+ 8 days are det]m9$1 ,! numb] ( 8 mon?s is ) !e1 ,& ?\ ha/ det]m9$ 8 b\nds t he _c pass40 7d7 ,john #ba3ai--8?is he spake1 signify+ by :at mann] ( dea? he %\ld glorify ,god40 7e7 ,good acts3 ,is4 #dd3bh--8t sai? ( ,cyrus1 ,he is my %eph]d & %all p]=m all my pleasure1 ev5 say+ ( ,j]usalem1 ,%e %all be built2 & ( ! temple1 ,?y f\ndation %all be laid02 ,eph4 #b3aj--8;,= we are 8 workman%ip1 creat$ 9 ,*ri/ ,jesus = good works1 :i* ,god a=e prep>$ t we %\ld walk 9 !m40 ,evil acts3 ,g54 #ej3bj--8;z = y1 ye meant evil aga9/ me2 b ,god meant x = good1 to br+ to pass1 z x is ?is day1 to save mu* p alive02 #a ,k4 #ab3ae--8,s ! k+ he>k5$ n unto ! p1 = x 0 a ?+ br\ght ab\t ( ,jehovah02 #bd--8;= ?is ?+ is ( me02 ,luke #bb3bc--8;,= ! ,son ( man inde$ goe?1 z x ha? be5 det]m9$3 b woe unto t man ?r\gh :om he is betray$02 ,acts #b3bc--8;him1 be+ deliv]$ up by ! det]m9ate c\nsel & =ekn[l$ge ( ,god1 ye by ! h& ( lawless m5 did crucify & slay02 #d3bg1 #bh--8( a tru? 9 ?is city aga9/ ?y holy ,s]vant ,jesus1 :o ?\ did/ ano9t1 bo? ,h]od & ,pontius ,pilate1 ) ! ,g5tiles & ! p ( ,israel1 7 ga!r$ toge!r1 to d :atsoev] ?y h& & ?y c\nsel =eorda9$ to come to pass02 ,rom4 #i3ag--8;,= ! scripture sai? unto ,ph>aoh1 ,= ?is v purpose did ,i raise !e up1 t ,i might %[ 9 !e my p[]02 #a ,pet #b3c--8,!y /umble at ! ^w1 be+ disob$i5t3 :]eunto also !y 7 appo9t$02 ,rev4 #ag3ag--8;,= ,god did put 9 _! he>ts to d 8 m9d1 & to come to "o m9d1 & to give _! k+dom unto ! bea/1 until ! words ( ,god %\ld be accompli%$40 ,c4 7a7 #a ,cor4 #b3g--8! wisdom :i* ha? be5 hidd51 :i* ,god =eorda9$ be=e ! worlds unto our glory02 ,eph #c3aj1 #aa--8manifold wisdom ( ,god1 accord+ to ! et]nal purpose :i* he purpos$ 9 ,*ri/ ,jesus our "l40 ,ephesians #a is a pan 9 praise ( ,god's decrees4 7b7 ,! greate/ decree ( all is ! decree to give ! _w to ,*ri/4 ,ps4 #b3g1 #h--8;,i w tell ( ! decree3444 ,i w give !e ! nations = ?9e inh]itance02 cf4 v]se #f--8;,i h set my k+ ,^u my holy hill ( ,zion02 #a ,cor4 #ae3be--8;he mu/ reign1 till he ha? put all 8 enemies "u 8 feet40 7c7 ,?is decree we are to conv]t into our decree2 ,god's w is to be execut$ ?r\gh our wills4 ,phil4 #b3ab1 #ac--8"w out y\r own salvation ) fe> & trembl+2 = x is ,god :o worke? 9 y bo? to w & to "w1 = 8 good pleasure40 ,rev4 #e3a1 #g--8;,i saw 9 ! "r h& ( him t sat on ! ?rone a book writt5 )9 & on ! back1 close seal$ ) sev5 seals4444 ,& he ! ,lamb came1 & he take? x out ( ! "r h& ( him t sat on ! ?rone02 v]se #i--8,wor?y art ?\ to take ! book1 & to op5 ! seals !re(0--,*ri/ alone has ! omnisci5ce to "k1 & ! omnipot5ce to execute1 ! div9e decrees4 ,:5 ,john weeps because !re is none 9 heav5 or e>? to loose ! seals & to read ! book ( ,god's decrees1 ! ,lion ( ! tribe ( ,judah prevails to op5 x4 ,only ,*ri/ conducts ! c\rse ( hi/ory to its appo9t$ end4 ,see ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,*ri/ 9 ,creation1 #bfh-bhc1 on ,! ,decree ( ,god z ! ,great ,enc\ragem5t to ,missions4 #b4 ,f ,reason4 ,a4 ,f ! ,div9e ,=ekn[l$ge4 ,=ekn[l$ge implies fixity1 & fixity implies decree4--,f et]nity ,god =esaw all ! ev5ts ( ! univ]se z fix$ & c]ta94 ,?is fixity & c]ta9ty c\ld n h _h its gr\nd ei!r 9 bl9d fate or 9 ! v>iable wills ( m51 s9ce nei!r ( ^! _h an exi/5ce4 ,x c\ld h _h its gr\nd 9 no?+ outside ! div9e m9d1 = 9 et]nity no?+ exi/$ besides ! div9e m9d4 ,b = ?is fixity !re mu/ h be5 a cause2 if any?+ 9 ! future 0 fix$1 some?+ mu/ h fix$ x4 ,?is fixity c\ld h _h its gr\nd only 9 ! plan & purpose ( ,god4 ,9 f9e1 if ,god =esaw ! future z c]ta91 x mu/ h be5 because !re 0 some?+ 9 himself :i* made x c]ta92 or1 9 o!r words1 because he _h decre$ x4 ,we object !re=e to ! /atem5t ( ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #gd--8;,god's k & ,god's purposes bo? be+ et]nal1 "o _c be conceiv$ z ! gr\nd ( ! o!r1 nor c ei!r be pr$icat$ to ! exclusion ( ! o!r z ! cause ( ?+s1 b1 correlative & et]nal1 !y mu/ be coequal quantities 9 ?\ght40 ,we reply t :ile decree does n *ronologically prec$e1 x does logically prec$e1 =ekn[l$ge4 ,=ekn[l$ge is n ( possible ev5ts1 b ( :at is c]ta9 to be4 ,! c]ta9ty ( future ev5ts :i* ,god =eknew c\ld h _h its gr\nd only 9 8 decree1 s9ce he alone exi/$ to be ! gr\nd & explanation ( ?is c]ta9ty4 ,ev5ts 7 fix$ only because ,god _h fix$ !m4 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3cig--8;,an ev5t mu/ be made c]ta91 be=e x c be kn[n z a c]ta9 ev5t40 ,turret91 ,in/4 ,!ol41 loc4 #c1 quaes4 #ab1 #ah--8,prcipuum fundam5tum sci5ti div9 circa futura cont+5tia e/ deoretum solum40 ,decree+ creation implies decree+ ! =ese5 results ( creation4--,to meet ! objection t ,god might h =ese5 ! ev5ts ( ! univ]se1 n because he _h decre$ ea* "o1 b only because he _h decre$ to create ! univ]se & in/itute its laws1 we may put ! argum5t 9 ano!r =m4 ,9 et]nity !re c\ld h be5 no cause ( ! future exi/5ce ( ! univ]se1 outside ( ,god himself1 s9ce no be+ exi/$ b ,god himself4 ,9 et]nity ,god =esaw t ! creation ( ! _w & ! in/itution ( its laws w\ld make c]ta9 its actual hi/ory ev5 to ! mo/ insignificant details4 ,b ,god decre$ to create & to in/itute ^! laws4 ,9 s decree+ he necess>ily decre$ all t 0 to come4 ,9 f9e1 ,god =esaw ! future ev5ts ( ! univ]se z c]ta91 because he _h decre$ to create2 b ?is det]m9ation to create involv$ also a det]m9ation ( all ! actual results ( t creation2 or1 9 o!r words1 ,god decre$ ^? results4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #hd--8,! exi/5ce ( div9e decrees may be inf]r$ f ! exi/5ce ( natural law40 ,law c]ta9ty ,god's w4 ,positivi/s express great contempt = ! doctr9e ( ! et]nal purpose ( ,god1 yet !y consign u to ! iron necessity ( physical =ces & natural laws4 ,dr4 ,rob9son also po9ts out t decrees are 8impli$ 9 ! prophecies4 ,we _c conceive t all ev5ts %\ld h conv]g$ t[>d ! "o great ev5t--! dea? ( ,*ri/--)\t ! int]v5tion ( an et]nal purpose40 ,e4 ,h4 ,johnson1 ,outl9e ,sy/4 ,!ol41 #b;d ed41 #bea1 note--8,reason is confront$ by ! p>adox t ! div9e decrees are at once absolute & conditional2 ! resolution ( ! p>adox is t ,god absolutely decre$ a conditional sy/em--a sy/em1 h[ev]1 ! work+s ( :i* he ?or\ghly =ekn[s40 ,! r\gh unhewn /one & ! /atue into :i* x w be trans=m$ are bo? & equally includ$ 9 ! plan ( ! sculptor4 ,no undecre$ ev5t c be =ese54--,we grant t ,god decrees prim>ily & directly 8 own acts ( creation1 provid5ce1 & grace2 b we claim t ?is involves also a second>y & indirect decree+ ( ! acts ( free creatures :i* he =esees w result !refrom4 ,!re is !re=e no su* ?+ 9 ,god z sci5tia m$ia1 or k ( an ev5t t is to be1 ?\gh x does n ent] into ! div9e plan2 = to say t ,god =esees an undecre$ ev5t1 is to say t he views z future an ev5t t is m]ely possible2 or1 9 o!r words1 t he views an ev5t n z x is4 ,we recognize only two k9ds ( k3 7#a7 ,k ( undecre$ possibles1 & 7#b7 =ekn[l$ge ( decre$ actuals4 ,sci5tia m$ia is a suppos$ int]m$iate k betwe5 ^! two1 namely 7#c7 =ekn[l$ge ( undecre$ actuals4 ,see fur!r explanations bel[4 ,we d5y ! exi/5ce ( ?is ?ird sort ( k4 ,we hold t s9 is decre$ 9 ! s5se ( be+ r5d]$ c]ta9 by ,god's det]m9+ ^u a sy/em 9 :i* x 0 =ese5 t s9 w\ld exi/4 ,! s9 ( man c be =ekn[n1 :ile yet ,god is n ! imm$iate cause ( x4 ,god kn[s possibilities1 )\t hav+ decre$ !m at all4 ,b ,god _c =ekn[ actualities unless he has by 8 decree made !m to be c]ta9ties ( ! future4 ,he _c =ekn[ t :i* is n !re to be =ekn[n4 ,royce1 ,_w & ,individual1 #b3cgd1 ma9ta9s t ,god has1 n =ek1 b only et]nal k1 ( temporal ?+s4 ,b we reply t to =ekn[ h[ a moral be+ w act is no m impossible ?an to "k h[ a moral be+ 9 giv5 circum/ances w\ld act4 ,only k ( t :i* is decre$ is =ekn[l$ge4--,k ( a plan z ideal or possible may prec$e decree2 b k ( a plan z actual or fix$ mu/ foll[ decree4 ,only ! latt] k is prop]ly =ek4 ,god !re=e =esees creation1 causes1 laws1 ev5ts1 consequ5ces1 because he has decre$ creation1 causes1 laws1 ev5ts1 consequ5ces2 t is1 because he has embrac$ all ^! 9 8 plan4 ,! d5ial ( decrees logically involves ! d5ial ( ,god's =ekn[l$ge ( free human actions2 & to ?is ,soc9ians1 & "s ,arm9ians1 are actually l$4 ,an ,arm9ian example ( ?is d5ial is f\nd 9 ,mc,cabe1 ,=ekn[l$ge ( ,god1 & ,div9e ,nesci5ce ( ,future ,cont+5cies a ,necessity4 ,p] contra1 see notes on ,god's =ekn[l$ge1 9 ?is ,comp5dium1 pages #bhc-bhf4 ,pepp]3 8,div9e volition /&s logically betwe5 two divisions & k9ds ( div9e k40 ,god knew free human actions z possible1 be=e he decre$ !m2 he knew !m z future1 because he decre$ !m4 ,logically1 ?\gh n *ronologically1 decree comes be=e =ekn[l$ge4 ,:5 ,i say1 8,i "k :at ,i w d10 x is evid5t t ,i h det]m9$ already1 & t my k does n prec$e det]m9ation1 b foll[s x & is bas$ ^u x4 ,x is !re=e n correct to say t ,god =ekn[s 8 decrees4 ,x is m true to say t he decrees 8 =ekn[l$ge4 ,he =ekn[s ! future :i* he has decre$1 & he =ekn[s x because he has decre$ x4 ,8 decrees are et]nal1 & no?+ t is et]nal c be ! object ( =ekn[l$ge4 ,g4 ,f4 ,wright1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 #ahgg3gbc--8,! k ( ,god compreh5d$ ! details & incid5ts ( e possible plan4 ,! *oice ( a plan made 8 k det]m9ate z =ek40 ,!re are !re=e two k9ds ( div9e k3 7#a7 k ( :at may be--( ! possible 7sci5tia simplicis intellig5ti72 & 7#b7 k ( :at is1 & is to be1 because ,god has decre$ x 7sci5tia visionis74 ,betwe5 ^! two ,mol9a1 ! ,spani% ,jesuit1 wrongly conceiv$ t !re 0 7#c7 a middle k ( ?+s :i* 7 to be1 al?\gh ,god _h n decre$ !m 7sci5tia m$ia74 ,?is w\ld ( c\rse be a k :i* ,god d]iv$1 n f himself1 b f 8 creatures6 ,see ,dick1 ,!ology1 #a3cea4 ,a4 ,s4 ,c>man3 8,x is difficult to see h[ ,god's k c be caus$ f et]nity by some?+ t has no exi/5ce until a def9ite po9t ( "t40 ,if x be said t :at is to be w be 89 ! nature ( ?+s10 we reply t !re is no 8nature ( ?+s0 ap>t f ,god1 & t ! gr\nd ( ! objective c]ta9ty1 z well z ( ! subjective c]titude correspond+ to x1 is to be f\nd only 9 ,god himself4 ,b ,god's decree+ to create1 :5 he =esees t c]ta9 free acts ( m5 w foll[1 is a decree+ ( ^? free acts1 9 ! only s5se 9 :i* we use ! ^w decree+1 viz41 a r5d]+ c]ta91 or embrac+ 9 8 plan4 ,no ,arm9ian :o believes 9 ,god's =ekn[l$ge ( free human acts has good reason = d5y+ ,god's decrees z ?us expla9$4 ,surely ,god did n =ekn[ t ,adam w\ld exi/ & s91 :e!r ,god det]m9$ to create him or n4 ,omnisci5ce1 !n1 becomes =ek only on condition ( ,god's decree4 ,t ,god's =ekn[l$ge ( free acts is intuitive does n affect ?is conclusion4 ,we grant t1 :ile man c pr$ict free action only s f> z x is rational 7i4 e41 9 ! l9e ( previ\sly dom9ant motive71 ,god c pr$ict free action :e!r x is rational or n4 ,b ev5 ,god _c pr$ict :at is n c]ta9 to be4 ,god c h intuitive =ekn[l$ge ( free human acts only ^u condition ( 8 own decree to create2 & ?is decree to create1 9 =esight ( all t w foll[1 is a decree ( :at foll[s4 ,= ! ,arm9ian view1 see ,watson1 ,in/itutes1 #b3cge-cih1 #dbb-ddh4 ,p] contra1 see ,hill1 ,div9ity1 #eab-ehb2 ,fiske1 9 ,bib4 ,sac41 ,april1 #ahfb2 ,b5nett ,tyl]1 ,memoir & ,lectures1 #bad-bed2 ,edw>ds ! y\ng]1 #a3cih-dbj2 ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 ,philosophy & ,religion1 #ih-aja4 ,b4 ,f ! ,div9e ,wisdom4 ,x is ! "p ( wisdom to proce$ 9 e und]tak+ accord+ to a plan4 ,! great] ! und]tak+1 ! m ne$ful a plan4 ,wisdom1 moreov]1 %[s itself 9 a c>eful provision = all possible circum/ances & em]g5cies t c arise 9 ! execution ( its plan4 ,t _m su* circum/ances & em]g5cies are uncontemplat$ & unprovid$ = 9 ! plans ( m51 is due only to ! limitations ( human wisdom4 ,x belongs to inf9ite wisdom1 !re=e1 n only to h a plan1 b to embrace all1 ev5 ! m9ute/ details1 9 ! plan ( ! univ]se4 ,no ar*itect w\ld attempt to build a ,cologne ca!dral )\t a plan2 he w\ld r1 if possible1 h a design = e /one4 ,! great pa9t] does n /udy out 8 picture z he goes along2 ! plan is 9 8 m9d f ! />t2 prep>ations = ! la/ effects h to be made f ! beg9n+4 ,s 9 ,god's "w e detail is =ese5 & provid$ =2 s9 & ,*ri/ ent]$ into ! orig9al plan ( ! univ]se4 ,raymond1 ,sy/4 ,!ol41 #b3aef1 says ?is implies t ,god _c gov]n ! _w unless all ?+s be r$uc$ to ! condition ( ma*9]y2 & t x _c be true1 = ! reason t ,god's gov]nm5t is a gov]nm5t ( p]sons & n ( ?+s4 ,b we reply t ! wise /atesman gov]ns p]sons & n ?+s1 yet j 9 proportion to 8 wisdom he conducts 8 adm9i/ration accord+ to a preconceiv$ plan4 ,god's p[] might1 b ,god's wisdom w\ld n1 gov]n ! univ]se )\t embrac+ all ?+s1 ev5 ! lea/ human action1 9 8 plan4 ,c4 ,f ! ,div9e ,immutability4 ,:at ,god does1 he always purpos$ to d4 ,s9ce ) him !re is no increase ( k or p[]1 su* z *>act]izes f9ite be+s1 x foll[s t :at "u any giv5 circum/ances he p]mits or does1 he mu/ h et]nally decre$ to p]mit or d4 ,to suppose t ,god has a multitude ( plans1 & t he *anges 8 plan ) ! exig5cies ( ! situation1 is to make him inf9itely dep5d5t ^u ! v>y+ wills ( 8 creatures1 & to d5y to him "o necess>y elem5t ( p]fection1 namely1 immutability4 ,god has be5 v unwor?ily comp>$ to a *ess-play]1 :o w *eckmate 8 oppon5t :atev] moves he may make 7,george ,h>ris74 ,s ,napoleon is said to h _h a numb] ( plans be=e ea* battle1 & to h betak5 himself f "o to ano!r z =tune dem&$4 ,n s ) ,god4 ,job #bc3ac--8;he is 9 "o m9d1 & :o c turn him80 ,james #a3ag-8! ,fa!r ( lights1 ) :om c be no v>iation1 nei!r %ad[ t is ca/ by turn+40 ,contra/ ) ?is ,scripture ,mc,cabe's /atem5t 9 8 ,=ekn[l$ge ( ,god1 #fb--8,?is new factor1 ! godlike lib]ty ( ! human w1 is capable ( ?w>t+1 & 9 unc\nt$ in/ances does ?w>t1 ! div9e w1 & compel ! great ,i ,,am to modify 8 actions1 8 purposes1 & 8 plans1 9 ! treatm5t ( individuals & ( communities40 ,d4 ,f ! ,div9e ,b5evol5ce4 ,! ev5ts ( ! univ]se1 if n det]m9$ by ! div9e decrees1 mu/ be det]m9$ ei!r by *ance or by ! wills ( creatures4 ,x is contr>y to any prop] conception ( ! div9e b5evol5ce to suppose t ,god p]mits ! c\rse ( nature & ( hi/ory1 & ! ends to :i* bo? ^! are mov+1 to be det]m9$ = myriads ( s5ti5t be+s by any o!r =ce or w ?an 8 own4 ,bo? reason & revelation1 !re=e1 compel u to accept ! doctr9e ( ! ,we/m9/] ,confession1 t 8,god did f all et]nity1 by ! mo/ j & holy c\nsel ( 8 own w1 freely & un*angeably orda9 :atsoev] comes to pass40 ,x w\ld n be b5evol5t = ,god to put out ( 8 own p[] t :i* 0 s ess5tial to ! happ9ess ( ! univ]se4 ,tyl]1 ,memoir & ,lectures1 #bca-bdc--8,! d5ial ( decrees involves d5ial ( ! ess5tial attributes ( ,god1 su* z omnipot5ce1 omnisci5ce1 b5evol5ce2 exhibits him z a disappo9t$ & unhappy be+2 implies d5ial ( 8 univ]sal provid5ce2 leads to a d5ial ( ! great] "p ( our own duty ( submission2 weak5s ! obligations ( gratitude40 ,we give ?anks to ,god = bless+s :i* come to u ?r\gh ! free acts ( o!rs2 b unless ,god has purpos$ ^! bless+s1 we owe our ?anks to ^! o!rs & n to ,god4 ,dr4 ,a4 ,j4 ,gordon said well t a univ]se )\t decrees w\ld be z irrational & appall+ z w\ld be an express-tra9 driv+ on 9 ! d>kness )\t headlight or eng9e]1 & ) no c]ta9ty t ! next mom5t x might n plunge into ! abyss4 ,& ev5 ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy1 #b3ajh1 9 spite ( 8 d5ial ( ,god's =ekn[l$ge ( man's free acts1 is compell$ to say3 8,x _c be left to m]e creat$ natures to play unconditionally ) ! helm ( ev5 a s+le _w & /e] x uncontroll$ into ! hav5 or on to ! reefs2 & "s security mu/ be tak5 = keep+ ! deflections )9 tol]able b\nds40 ,see also ,emmons1 ,works1 #d3bgc-dja3 & ,pr9ceton ,essays1 #a3eg-gc4 ,,iii4 ,objections to ! ,doctr9e ( ,decrees4 #a4 ,t !y are inconsi/5t ) ! free ag5cy ( man4 ,to ?is we reply t3 ,a4 ,! objection conf\nds ! decrees ) ! execution ( ! decrees4 ,! decrees are1 l =ekn[l$ge1 an act et]nal to ! div9e nature1 & are no m inconsi/5t ) free ag5cy ?an =ekn[l$ge is4 ,ev5 =ekn[l$ge ( ev5ts implies t ^? ev5ts are fix$4 ,if ?is absolute fixity & =ekn[l$ge is n inconsi/5t ) free ag5cy1 mu* less c t :i* is m remote f man's action1 namely1 ! hidd5 cause ( ?is fixity & =ekn[l$ge--,god's decrees--be inconsi/5t ) free ag5cy4 ,if any?+ be inconsi/5t ) man's free ag5cy1 x mu/ be1 n ! decrees !mselves1 b ! execution ( ! decrees 9 creation & provid5ce4 ,on ?is objection1 see ,tyl]1 ,memoir & ,lectures1 #bdd-bdi2 ,=bes1 ,pr$e/9ation & ,free ,w1 #c--8;,all ?+s are pr$e/9at$ by ,god1 bo? good & evil1 b n pr5ecessitat$1 t is1 causally prerda9$ by him--unless we w\ld make ,god ! au?or ( s94 ,pr$e/9ation is ?us an indiff]5t ^w1 9 s f> z ! orig9at+ au?or ( any?+ is conc]n$2 ,god be+ ! orig9ator ( good1 b ! creature1 ( evil4 ,pr$e/9ation !re=e means t ,god includ$ 9 8 plan ( ! _w e act ( e creature1 good or bad4 ,"s acts he pr$e/9$ causally1 o!rs p]missively4 ,! c]ta9ty ( ! fulfilm5t ( all ,god's purposes ought to be di/+ui%$ f _! necessity40 ,?is means simply t ,god's decree is n ! cause ( any act or ev5t4 ,god's decrees may be execut$ by ! causal effici5cy ( 8 creatures1 or !y may be execut$ by 8 own effici5cy4 ,9 ei!r case x is1 if any?+1 ! execution1 & n ! decree1 t is inconsi/5t ) human fre$om4 ,b4 ,! objection re/s ^u a false !ory ( free ag5cy--namely1 t free ag5cy implies indet]m9at5ess or unc]ta9ty2 9 o!r words1 t free ag5cy _c coxi/ ) c]ta9ty z to ! results ( its ex]cise4 ,b x is necessity1 n c]ta9ty1 ) :i* free ag5cy is inconsi/5t4 ,free ag5cy is ! p[] ( self-det]m9ation 9 view ( motives1 or man's p[] 7a7 to *ose betwe5 motives1 & 7b7 to direct 8 subsequ5t activity accord+ to ! motive ?us *os54 ,motives are nev] a cause1 b only an occasion2 !y influ5ce1 b nev] compel2 ! man is ! cause1 & h]e9 is 8 fre$om4 ,b x is also true t man is nev] 9 a /ate ( indet]m9at5ess2 nev] acts )\t motive1 or contr>y to all motives2 !re is always a reason :y he acts1 & h]e9 is 8 rationality4 ,n[1 s f> z man acts accord+ to previ\sly dom9ant motive--see 7b7 above--we may by kn[+ 8 motive pr$ict 8 action1 & our c]ta9ty :at t action w be 9 no way affects 8 fre$om4 ,we may ev5 br+ motives to be> ^u o!rs1 ! influ5ce ( :i* we =esee1 yet ^? :o act ^u !m may act 9 p]fect fre$om4 ,b if man1 influ5c$ by man1 may /ill be free1 !n man1 influ5c$ by div9ely =ese5 motives1 may /ill be free1 & ! div9e decrees1 :i* simply r5d] c]ta9 man's actions1 may also be p]fectly consi/5t ) man's fre$om4 ,we mu/ n assume t decre$ ends c be secur$ only by compulsion4 ,et]nal purposes d n necessitate effici5t causation on ! "p ( ! purpos]4 ,fre$om may be ! v means ( fulfill+ ! purpose4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son1 ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 #gd--8;,absolute c]ta9ty ( ev5ts1 :i* is all t omnisci5ce det]m9es respect+ !m1 is n id5tical ) _! necessitation40 ,john ,milton1 ,*ri/ian ,doctr9e3 8,future ev5ts :i* ,god has =ese5 w happ5 c]ta9ly1 b n ( necessity4 ,!y w happ5 c]ta9ly1 because ! div9e presci5ce w n be deceiv$2 b !y w n happ5 necess>ily1 because presci5ce c h no influ5ce on ! object =ekn[n1 inasmu* z x is only an intransitive action40 ,!re is1 h[ev]1 a small] class ( human actions by :i* "* is *ang$1 r ?an express$1 & 9 :i* ! man acts accord+ to a motive diff]5t f t :i* has previ\sly be5 dom9ant--see 7a7 above4 ,^! actions also are =ekn[n by ,god1 al?\gh !y _c be pr$ict$ by man4 ,man's fre$om 9 !m w\ld be inconsi/5t ) ,god's decrees1 if ! previ\s c]ta9ty ( _! occurr5ce 71 n c]ta9ty1 b necessity2 or1 9 o!r words1 if ,god's decrees 7 9 all cases decrees effici5tly to produce ! acts ( 8 creatures4 ,b ?is is n ! case4 ,god's decrees may be execut$ by man's free causation1 z easily z by ,god's2 & ,god's decree+ ?is free causation1 9 decree+ to create a univ]se ( :i* he =esees t ?is causation w be a "p1 9 no way int]f]es ) ! fre$om ( su* causation1 b r secures & e/abli%es x4 ,bo? consci\sness & consci5ce witness t ,god's decrees are n execut$ by lay+ compulsion ^u ! free wills ( m54 ,! f>m] :o1 aft] he>+ a s]mon on ,god's decrees1 took ! break-neck road in/ead ( ! safe "o to 8 home & broke 8 wagon 9 consequ5ce1 conclud$ be=e ! end ( 8 j\rney t he at any rate _h be5 pr$e/9at$ to be a fool1 & t he _h made 8 call+ & election sure4 ,ladd1 ,philosophy ( ,conduct1 #adf1 #ahg1 %[s t ! w is free1 fir/1 by man's consci\sness ( ability1 &1 secondly1 by man's consci\sness ( imputability4 ,by nature1 he is pot5tially self-det]m9+2 z matt] ( fact1 he (t5 becomes self-det]m9+4 ,all51 ,religi\s ,progress1 #aaj--8,! com+ *ur* mu/ embrace ! sov]eignty ( ,god & ! fre$om ( ! w2 total depravity & ! div9ity ( human nature2 ! unity ( ,god & ! triune di/9ctions 9 ! ,godhead2 gno/icism & agno/icism2 ! humanity ( ,*ri/ & 8 inc>nate deity2 ! fre$om ( ! ,*ri/ian man & ! au?ority ( ! *ur*2 individualism & solid>ity2 reason & fai?2 sci5ce & !ology2 miracle & uni=mity ( law2 culture & piety2 ! au?ority ( ! ,bible z ! ^w ( ,god ) absolute fre$om ( ,biblical criticism2 ! gift ( adm9i/ration z 9 ! hi/oric episcopate & ! gift ( prophecy z ! highe/ sanction ( ! m9i/]ial commission2 ! apo/olic succession b also ! direct & imm$iate call :i* kn[s only ! succession ( ! ,holy ,gho/40 ,)\t ass5t+ to ^! latt] clauses we may comm5d ! compreh5sive _s ( ?is utt]ance1 especially ) ref]5ce to ! vex$ "q ( ! relation ( div9e sov]eignty to human fre$om4 ,x may aid u1 9 e/imat+ ! =ce ( ?is objection1 to note ! f\r s5ses 9 :i* ! t]m 8fre$om0 may be us$4 ,x may be us$ z equival5t to 7#a7 physical fre$om1 or abs5ce ( outw>d con/ra9t2 7#b7 =mal fre$om1 or a /ate ( moral indet]m9at5ess2 7#c7 moral fre$om1 or self-det]m9at5ess 9 view ( motives2 7#d7 real fre$om1 or ability to con=m to ! div9e /&>d4 ,) ! fir/ ( ^! we are n n[ conc]n$1 s9ce all agree t ! decrees lay no outw>d con/ra9t ^u m54 ,fre$om 9 ! second s5se has no exi/5ce1 s9ce all m5 h "*4 ,free ag5cy1 or fre$om 9 ! ?ird s5se1 has j be5 %[n to be consi/5t ) ! decrees4 ,fre$om 9 ! f\r? s5se1 or real fre$om1 is ! special gift ( ,god1 & is n to be conf\nd$ ) free ag5cy4 ,! objection m5tion$ above re/s :olly ^u ! second ( ^! def9itions ( free ag5cy4 ,?is we h %[n to be false1 & ) ?is ! objection itself falls to ! gr\nd4 ,rits*l1 ,ju/ification & ,reconciliation1 #acc-ahh1 gives a good def9ition ( ?is f\r? k9d ( fre$om3 8,fre$om is self-det]m9ation by univ]sal ideals4 ,limit+ our ends to ^? ( family or c\ntry is a ref9$ or idealiz$ selfi%ness4 ,fre$om is self-det]m9ation by univ]sal love = man or by ! k+dom ( ,god4 ,b ! free man mu/ !n be dep5d5t on ,god 9 ev]y?+1 because ! k+dom ( ,god is a revelation ( ,god40 ,john ,caird1 ,fundam5tal ,ideas ( ,*ri/ianity1 #a3acc--8;,9 be+ det]m9$ by ,god we are self-det]m9$2 i4 e41 det]m9$ by no?+ ali5 to u1 b by our noble/1 true/ self4 ,! univ]sal life lives 9 u4 ,! et]nal consci\sness becomes our own2 = #8he t abide? 9 love abide? 9 ,god & ,god abide? 9 him' 7#a ,john #d3af740 ,mob]ly1 ,atonem5t & ,p]sonality1 #bbf--8;,free w is n ! indep5d5ce ( ! creature1 b is r 8 self-realization 9 p]fect dep5d5ce4 ,fre$om is self-id5tity ) goodness4 ,bo? goodness & fre$om are1 9 _! p]fectness1 9 ,god4 ,goodness 9 a creature is n di/9ction f1 b correspond5ce )1 ! goodness ( ,god4 ,fre$om 9 a creature is correspond5ce ) ,god's own self-id5tity ) goodness4 ,x is to realize & to f9d himself1 8 true self1 9 ,*ri/1 s t ,god's love 9 u has become a div9e response1 adequate to1 because truly mirror+1 ,god40 ,g4 ,s4 ,lee1 ,! ,%ad[ ,*ri/1 #cb--48,! t5 comm&m5ts c\ld n be *ant$4 ,! ,israelites sang ab\t ,jehovah & :at he _h done1 b !y did n s+ ab\t :at he told !m to d1 & t is :y !y nev] did x4 ,! conception ( duty t _c s+ mu/ weep until x le>ns to s+4 ,?is is ,hebrew hi/ory40 8,!re is a lib]ty1 unsung ,by poets & by s5ators unprais$1 ,:i* mon>*s _c grant nor all ! p[]s ,( e>? & hell conf$]ate take away2 ,a lib]ty :i* p]secution1 fraud1 ,oppressions1 prisons1 h no p[] to b9d2 ,:i* :oso ta/es c be enslav$ no m4 ',t is lib]ty ( he>t1 d]iv$ f heav51 ,b\ght ) 8 blood :o gave x to mank9d1 ,& seal$ ) ! same tok540 ,rob]t ,h]rick3 8,/one walls d n a prison make1 ,nor iron b>s a cage2 ,m9ds innoc5t & quiet take ,t = a h]mitage4 ,if ,i h fre$om 9 my love1 ,& 9 my s\l am free1 ,angels alone t so> above ,enjoy su* lib]ty40 ,a m full discussion ( ! doctr9e ( ! ,w is giv5 "u ,an?ropology1 ,vol4 ,,ii4 ,x is suffici5t "h to say t ! ,arm9ian objections to ! decrees arise almo/ :olly f errone\sly conceiv+ ( fre$om z ! w's p[] to decide1 9 any giv5 case1 aga9/ its own "* & all ! motives br\ght to be> ^u x4 ,z we %all h]eaft] see1 ?is is practically to d5y t man has "*1 or t ! w by its "r or wrong moral action gives to itself1 z well z to ! intellect & affections1 a p]man5t b5t or pr$isposition to good or evil4 ,x is to ext5d ! p[] ( contr>y *oice1 a p[] :i* belongs to ! sph]e ( transi5t volition1 ov] all ^? p]man5t /ates ( intellect1 affection1 & w :i* we call ! moral "*1 & to say t we c *ange directly by a s+le volition t :i*1 z a matt] ( fact1 we c *ange only indirectly ?r\gh process & means4 ,yet ev5 ?is exagg]at$ view ( fre$om w\ld seem n to exclude ,god's decrees1 or prev5t a practical reconciliation ( ! ,arm9ian & ,calv9i/ic views1 s long z ! ,arm9ian grants ,god's =ekn[l$ge ( free human acts1 & ! ,calv9i/ grants t ,god's decree ( ^! acts is n necess>ily a decree t ,god w effici5tly produce !m4 ,= a close approximation ( ! two views1 see articles by ,raymond & by ,a4 ,a4 ,hodge1 respectively1 on ! ,arm9ian & ! ,calv9i/ic ,doctr9es ( ! ,w1 9 ,mc,clintock & ,/rong's ,cyclopdia1 #aj3ihi1 #iib4 ,we !re=e hold to ! c]ta9ty ( human action1 & s "p company ) ! ,arm9ian4 ,we _c ) ,:$on 7,on ! ,w71 & ,haz>d 7,man a ,creative ,fir/ ,cause71 attribute to ! w ! fre$om ( indiff]5ce1 or ! p[] to act )\t motive4 ,we hold ) ,cald]wood1 ,moral ,philosophy1 #ahh1 t action )\t motive1 or an act ( pure w1 is unkn[n 9 consci\sness 7see1 h[ev]1 an inconsi/5t /atem5t ( ,cald]wood on page #ahh ( ! same "w74 ,e future human act w n only be p]=m$ ) a motive1 b w c]ta9ly be "o ?+ r ?an ano!r2 & ,god kn[s :at x w be4 ,:atev] may be ! me?od ( ,god's =ekn[l$ge1 & :e!r x be d]iv$ f motives or be intuitive1 t =ekn[l$ge presupposes ,god's decree to create1 & s presupposes ! mak+ c]ta9 ( ! free acts t foll[ creation4 ,b ?is c]ta9ty is n necessity4 ,9 reconcil+ ,god's decrees ) human fre$om1 we mu/ n g to ! o!r extreme1 & r$uce human fre$om to m]e det]m9ism1 or ! p[] ( ! ag5t to act out 8 "* 9 ! circum/ances :i* environ him4 ,human action is n simply ! expression ( previ\sly dom9ant affections2 else ,nei!r ,satan nor ,adam c\ld h fall51 nor c\ld ! ,*ri/ian ev] s94 ,we !re=e "p company ) ,jona?an ,edw>ds & 8 ,treatise on ! ,fre$om ( ! ,w1 z well z ) ! y\ng] ,edw>ds 7,works1 #a3dbj71 ,alex&] 7,moral ,sci5ce1 #ajg71 & ,*>les ,hodge 7,sy/4 ,!ology1 #b3bgh71 all ( :om foll[ ,jona?an ,edw>ds 9 id5tify+ s5sibility ) ! w1 9 reg>d+ affections z ! causes ( volitions1 & 9 speak+ ( ! connection betwe5 motive & action z a necess>y "o4 ,we hold1 on ! contr>y1 t s5sibility & w are two di/9ct p[]s1 t affections are occasions b nev] causes ( volitions1 & t1 :ile motives may infallibly p]suade1 !y nev] compel ! w4 ,! p[] to make ! decision o!r ?an x is resides 9 ! w1 ?\gh x may nev] be ex]cis$4 ,) ,*>nock1 ! ,puritan 7,attributes1 #a3ddh-dej71 we say t 8man ha? a p[] to d o!rwise ?an t :i* ,god =ekn[s he w d40 ,s9ce1 !n1 ,god's decrees are n execut$ by lay+ compulsion ^u human wills1 !y are n inconsi/5t ) man's fre$om4 ,see ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy1 #b3bcg1 #bdi1 #beh1 #bfa2 also article by ,a4 ,h4 ,/rong1 on ,modifi$ ,calv9ism1 or ,rema9d]s ( ,fre$om 9 ,man1 9 ,bapti/ ,review1 #ahhc3bai-bdc2 repr9t$ 9 ! au?or's ,philosophy & ,religion1 #aad-abh4 #b4 ,t !y take away all motive = human ex]tion4 ,to ?is we reply t3 7a7 ,!y _c ?us influ5ce m51 s9ce !y are n address$ to m51 are n ! rule ( human action1 & become kn[n only aft] ! ev5t4 ,?is objection is !re=e ! m]e excuse ( indol5ce & disob$i5ce4 ,m5 r>ely make ?is excuse 9 any ent]prise 9 :i* _! hopes & _! int]e/s are enli/$4 ,x is ma9ly 9 matt]s ( religion t m5 use ! div9e decrees z an apology = _! slo? & inaction4 ,! pass5g]s on an ocean /eam] d n d5y _! ability to walk to />bo>d or to l>bo>d1 ^u ! plea t !y are be+ c>ri$ to _! de/9ation by =ces beyond _! control4 ,su* a plea w\ld be /ill m irrational 9 a case :]e ! pass5g]s' inaction1 z 9 case ( fire1 might result 9 de/ruction to ! %ip4 7b7 ,! objection conf\nds ! decrees ( ,god ) fate4 ,b x is to be obs]v$ t fate is un9tellig5t1 :ile ! decrees are fram$ by a p]sonal ,god 9 inf9ite wisdom2 fate is indi/+ui%able f mat]ial causation & leaves no room = human fre$om1 :ile ! decrees exclude all notion ( physical necessity2 fate embraces no moral ideas or ends1 :ile ! decrees make ^! controll+ 9 ! univ]se4 ,nor? ,briti% ,rev41 ,april1 #ahgj--8;,det]m9ism & pr$e/9ation spr+ f premises :i* lie 9 q sep>ate regions ( ?\ght4 ,! pr$e/9>ian is oblig$ by 8 !ology to admit ! exi/5ce ( a free w 9 ,god1 &1 z a matt] ( fact1 he does admit x 9 ! devil4 ,b ! f9al consid]ation :i* puts a great gulf betwe5 ! det]m9i/ & ! pr$e/9>ian is ?is1 t ! latt] ass]ts ! reality ( ! vulg> notion ( moral des]t4 ,ev5 if he 7 n oblig$ by 8 int]pretation ( ,scripture to ass]t ?is1 he w\ld be oblig$ to ass]t x 9 ord] to help out 8 doctr9e ( et]nal reprobation40 ,haw?orne express$ 8 belief 9 human fre$om :5 be said t de/9y itself _h (t5 be5 wor/$ 9 ! attempt to get him out to d9n]4 ,b5jam9 ,frankl91 9 8 ,autobiography1 quotes ! ,indian's excuse = gett+ drunk3 8,! ,great ,_s made all ?+s = "s use1 & :atsoev] use !y 7 made =1 to t use !y mu/ be put4 ,! ,great ,_s made rum = ,indians to get drunk )1 & s x mu/ be40 ,m>?a1 9 ,isabel ,c>naby1 excuses h] break+ ( di%es by say+3 8,x seems z if x 0 to be4 ,x is ! ?9 edge ( ! w$ge t 9 "t w turn aga9 & r5d y40 ,sem9>y pr(essor3 8,did a man ev] die be=e 8 "t80 ,sem9>y /ud5t3 8,i nev] knew ( su* a case40 ,! decrees ( ,god1 consid]$ z ,god's all-embrac+ plan1 leave room = human fre$om4 7c7 ,! objection ignores ! logical relation betwe5 ! decree ( ! end & ! decree ( ! means to secure x4 ,! decrees ( ,god n only ensure ! end to be obta9$1 b !y ensure free human action z logically prior !reto4 ,all conflict betwe5 ! decrees & human ex]tion mu/ !re=e be app>5t & n real4 ,s9ce consci\sness & ,scripture assure u t free ag5cy exi/s1 x mu/ exi/ by div9e decree2 & ?\gh we may be ignorant ( ! me?od 9 :i* ! decrees are execut$1 we h no "r to d\bt ei!r ! decrees or ! fre$om4 ,!y mu/ be held to be consi/5t1 until "o ( !m is prov$ to be a delusion4 ,! man :o c>ries a vase ( gold-fi% does n prev5t ! fi% f mov+ unre/ra9$ly )9 ! vase4 ,! d\ble track ( a railway enables a =midable approa*+ tra9 to slip by )\t collid+ ) our own4 ,our globe takes u ) x1 z x ru%es ar\nd ! sun1 yet we d our ord9>y "w )\t int]ruption4 ,! two movem5ts :i* at fir/ sight seem inconsi/5t ) ea* o!r are really p>ts ( "o :ole4 ,god's plan & man's ef=t are equally 9 h>mony4 ,my]s1 ,human ,p]sonality1 #b3bgb1 speaks ( 8molecul> motion amid mol> calm40 ,dr4 ,duryea3 8,! way ( life has two f5ces4 ,!re is an ,arm9ian f5ce to keep u out ( ,fatalism2 & !re is a ,calv9i/ic f5ce to keep u out ( ,pelagianism4 ,"s good bre?r5 l to walk on ! f5ces4 ,b x is h>d 9 t way to keep "o's balance4 ,& x is ne$less1 = !re is pl5ty ( room betwe5 ! f5ces4 ,= my "p ,i pref] to walk 9 ! road40 ,ar*ibald ,alex&]'s /atem5t is yet bett]3 8,calv9ism is ! broade/ ( sy/ems4 ,x reg>ds ! div9e sov]eignty & ! fre$om ( ! human w z ! two sides ( a ro( :i* come toge!r at a ridgepole above ! cl\ds4 ,calv9ism accepts bo? tru?s4 ,a sy/em :i* d5ies ei!r "o ( ! two has only half a ro( ov] its head40 ,spurgeon1 ,autobiography1 #a3agf1 & ,! ,be/ ,bread1 #aji--8,! sy/em ( tru? reveal$ 9 ! ,scriptures is n simply "o /raight l9e b two1 & no man w ev] get a "r view ( ! gospel until he kn[s h[ to look at ! two l9es at once4444 ,^! two facts ( div9e sov]eignty & ( human fre$om are p>allel l9es2 ,i _c make !m unite1 b y _c make !m cross ea* o!r40 ,john ,a4 ,broadus3 8,y c see only two sides ( a build+ at once2 if y g ar\nd x1 y see two diff]5t sides1 b ! fir/ two are hidd54 ,?is is true if y are on ! gr\nd4 ,b if y get up ^u ! ro( or 9 a balloon1 y c see t !re are f\r sides1 & y c see !m all toge!r4 ,s our f9ite m9ds c take 9 sov]eignty & fre$om alt]nately1 b n simultane\sly4 ,god f above c see !m bo?1 & f heav5 we too may be able to look d[n & see40 7d7 ,s9ce ! decrees connect means & ends toge!r1 & ends are decre$ only z ! result ( means1 !y enc\rage ef=t in/ead ( disc\rag+ x4 ,belief 9 ,god's plan t success %all rew>d toil1 incites to c\rage\s & p]sev]+ ef=t4 ,^u ! v gr\nd ( ,god's decree1 ! ,scripture urges u to ! dilig5t use ( means4 ,god has decre$ ! h>ve/ only z ! result ( man's labor 9 s[+ & reap+2 ,god decrees weal? to ! man :o works & saves2 s answ]s are decre$ to pray]1 & salvation to fai?4 ,comp>e ,paul's decl>ation ( ,god's purpose 7,acts #bg3bb1 #bd--8!re %all be no loss ( life among y4444 ,god ha? grant$ !e all !m t sail ) !e07 ) 8 w>n+ to ! c5turion & sailors to use ! means ( safety 7v]se #ca--8;,except ^! abide 9 ! %ip1 ye _c be sav$074 ,see also ,phil4 #b3ab1 #ac--8"w out y\r own salvation ) fe> & trembl+1 = x is ,god :o worke? 9 y bo? to w & to "w1 = 8 good pleasure02 ,eph4 #b3aj--8we are 8 workman%ip1 creat$ 9 ,*ri/ ,jesus = good works1 :i* ,god a=e prep>$ t we %\ld walk 9 !m02 ,deut4 #bi3bi--8! secret ?+s belong unto ,jehovah our ,god3 b ! ?+s t are reveal$ belong unto u & to our *ildr5 = ev]1 t we may d all ! words ( ?is law40 ,see ,b5net ,tyl]1 ,memoir & ,lectures1 #beb-ced4 ,ps4 #ei3aj 7,a4 ,v47--8,! ,god ( my m]cy %all prev5t me0--%all anticipate1 or g be=e1 me2 ,is4 #fe3bd--8;be=e !y call1 ,i w answ]2 & :ile !y are yet speak+1 ,i w he>02 ,ps4 #bc3b--8;,he leade? me02 ,john #aj3c--8;calle? 8 own %eep by "n1 & leade? !m out40 ,^! texts describe prev5i5t grace 9 pray]1 9 conv]sion1 & 9 ,*ri/ian "w4 ,plato call$ reason & s5sibility a mismat*$ pair1 "o ( :i* 0 always gett+ ahead ( ! o!r4 ,decrees & fre$om seem to be mismat*$1 b !y are n s4 ,ev5 ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 ) 8 det]m9i/ic !ory ( ! w1 c\ld1 9 8 s]mon on ,press+ into ! ,k+dom1 insi/ on ! use ( means1 & c\ld appeal to m5 z if !y _h ! p[] to *oose betwe5 ! motives ( self & ( ,god4 ,god's sov]eignty & human fre$om are l ! positive & ! negative poles ( ! magnet1--!y are insep>able f "o ano!r1 & are bo? indisp5sable elem5ts 9 ! attraction ( ! gospel4 ,pet] ,damiani1 ! great monk-c>d9al1 said t ! s9 he f\nd x h>de/ to uproot 0 8 disposition to laught]4 ,! homage paid to asceticism is ! homage paid to ! conqu]or4 ,b n all conque/s are wor?y ( homage4 ,bett] ! words ( ,lu!r3 8,if our ,god may make excell5t l>ge pike & good ,rh5i% w9e1 ,i may v well v5ture to eat & dr9k4 ,?\ maye/ enjoy e pleasure 9 ! _w t is n s9ful2 ?y ,god =bids !e n1 b r wills x4 ,& x is pleas+ to ! de> ,god :5ev] ?\ rejoice/ or laughe/ f ! bottom ( ?y he>t40 ,b our fre$om has its limits4 ,m>?a ,bak] ,dunn3 8,a man fi%+ = pick]el baits 8 hook ) a live m9n[ & ?r[s him into ! wat]4 ,! little m9n[ seems to be swimm+ gaily at 8 own free w1 b j ! mom5t he attempts to move out ( 8 appo9t$ c\rse he beg9s to realize t !re is a hook 9 8 back4 ,t is :at we f9d out :5 we try to swim aga9/ ! /ream ( ,god's decrees40 #c4 ,t !y make ,god ! au?or ( s94 ,to ?is we reply3 7a7 ,!y make ,god1 n ! au?or ( s91 b ! au?or ( free be+s :o are !mselves ! au?ors ( s94 ,god does n decree effici5tly to "w evil desires or *oices 9 m54 ,he decrees s9 only 9 ! s5se ( decree+ to create & pres]ve ^? :o w s92 9 o!r words1 he decrees to create & pres]ve human wills :i*1 9 _! own self-*os5 c\rses1 w be & d evil4 ,9 all ?is1 man attributes s9 to himself & n to ,god1 & ,god hates1 d5\nces1 & puni%es s94 ,joseph's bre?r5 7 none ! less wick$ = ! fact t ,god meant _! conduct to result 9 good 7,g54 #ej3bj74 ,pope ,leo ,x & 8 indulg5ces br\ght on ! ,re=mation1 b he 0 none ! less guilty4 ,slavehold]s w\ld h be5 no m excusable1 ev5 if !y _h be5 able to prove t ! negro race 0 curs$ 9 ! curse ( ,canaan 7,g54 #i3be--8;,curs$ be ,canaan2 a s]vant ( s]vants %all he be unto 8 bre?r5074 ,fit*1 9 ,*ri/ian ,spectator1 #c3fja--8,!re c be & is a purpose ( ,god :i* is n an effici5t purpose4 ,x embraces ! volunt>y acts ( moral be+s1 )\t creat+ ^? acts by div9e effici5cy40 ,see ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy1 #b3ajg1 #acf4 ,mat4 #bf3bd--8,! ,son ( man goe? ev5 z x is writt5 ( him3 b woe unto t man ?r\gh :om ! ,son ( man is betray$6 good 7 x = t man if he _h n be5 born40 ,x 0 appo9t$ t ,*ri/ %\ld suff]1 b t did n make m5 less free ag5ts1 nor dim9i% ! guilt ( _! trea*]y & inju/ice4 ,rob]t ,g4 ,+]soll ask$3 8,:y did ,god create ! devil80 ,we reply t ,god did n create ! devil1--x 0 ! devil :o made ! devil4 ,god made a holy & free _s :o abus$ 8 lib]ty1 himself creat$ s91 & s made himself a devil4 ,pfleid]]1 ,philos4 ,religion1 #a3bii--8;,evil has be5 ref]r$ to #a4 an extra-div9e pr9ciple--to "o or _m evil spirits1 or to fate1 or to matt]--at all ev5ts to a pr9ciple limit+ ! div9e p[]2 #b4 a want or defect 9 ! ,deity himself1 ei!r 8 imp]fect wisdom or 8 imp]fect goodness2 #c4 human culpability1 ei!r a univ]sal imp]fection ( human nature1 or p>ticul> transgressions ( ! fir/ m540 ,! ?ird ( ^! explanations is ! true "o3 ! fir/ is irrational2 ! second is blasphem\s4 ,yet ?is second is ! explanation ( ,om> ,khayym1 ,rubiyat1 /anzas #hj1 #ha--8,oh ,?\1 :o did/ ) pitfall & ) g9 ,beset ! road ,i 0 to w&] 91 ,?\ wilt n ) pr$e/9$ evil r\nd ,enme%1 & !n impute my fall to s94 ,oh ,?\1 :o man ( bas] e>? did/ make1 ,& ev'n ) ,p>adise devise ! snake3 ,= all ! s9 :]e) ! face ( man ,is black5$--man's =giv5ess give--& take60 ,& ,david ,h>um simil>ly says3 8,if ,i've done any?+ to be sorry =1 ,i'm will+ to be =giv540 7b7 ,! decree to p]mit s9 is !re=e n an effici5t b a p]missive decree1 or a decree to p]mit1 9 di/9ction f a decree to produce by 8 own effici5cy4 ,no difficulty atta*es to su* a decree to p]mit s91 :i* does n atta* to ! actual p]mission ( x4 ,b ,god does actually p]mit s91 & x mu/ be "r = him to p]mit x4 ,x mu/ !re=e be "r = him to decree to p]mit x4 ,if ,god's hol9ess & wisdom & p[] are n impugn$ by ! actual exi/5ce ( moral evil1 !y are n impugn$ by ! orig9al decree t x %\ld exi/4 ,jona?an ,edw>ds1 ,works1 #b3ajj--8,! sun is n ! cause ( ! d>kness t foll[s its sett+1 b only ! occasion02 #bed--8;,if by ! au?or ( s9 be meant ! s9n]1 ! ag5t1 or ! actor ( s91 or ! do] ( a wick$ ?+--s x w\ld be a reproa* & blasphemy to suppose ,god to be ! au?or ( s94444 ,b if by au?or ( s9 is meant ! p]mitt] or non-h9d]] ( s91 & at ! same "t a dispos] ( ! /ate ( ev5ts 9 su* a mann]1 = wise1 holy1 & mo/ excell5t ends & purposes1 t s91 if x be p]mitt$ & n h9d]$1 w mo/ c]ta9ly foll[1 ,i d n d5y t ,god is ! au?or ( s93 x is no reproa* to ! ,mo/ ,high to be ?us ! au?or ( s940 ,on ! objection t ! doctr9e ( decrees imputes to ,god two wills1 & t he has =eorda9$ :at he has =bidd51 see ,b5net ,tyl]1 ,memoir & ,lectures1 #bej-beb--8;,a rul] may =bid treason2 b 8 comm& does n oblige him to d all 9 8 p[] to prev5t disob$i5ce to x4 ,x may promote ! good ( 8 k+dom to suff] ! treason to be committ$1 & ! traitor to be puni%$ accord+ to law4 ,t 9 view ( ?is result+ good he *ooses n to prev5t ! treason1 does n imply any contradiction or opposition ( w 9 ! mon>*40 ,an ungodly editor excus$ 8 vici\s j\rnalism by say+ t he 0 n a%am$ to describe any?+ :i* ,provid5ce _h p]mitt$ to happ54 ,b 8p]mitt$0 "h _h an implication ( causation4 ,he laid ! blame ( ! evil ^u ,provid5ce4 ,he 0 a%am$ to describe _m ?+s t 7 good & :i* ,god actually caus$1 :ile he 0 n a%am$ to describe ! immoral ?+s :i* ,god did n cause1 b only p]mitt$ m5 to cause4 ,9 ?is s5se we may ass5t to ,jona?an ,edw>ds's words3 8,! div9e ,be+ is n ! au?or ( s91 b only disposes ?+s 9 su* a mann] t s9 w c]ta9ly ensue40 ,^! words are f\nd 9 8 treatise on ,orig9al ,s94 ,9 8 ,essay on ,fre$om ( ! ,w1 he adds a doctr9e ( causation :i* we mu/ repudiate3 8,! ess5ce ( virtue & vice1 z !y exi/ 9 ! disposition ( ! he>t1 & are manife/$ 9 ! acts ( ! w1 lies n 9 _! ,cause b 9 _! ,nature40 ,we reply t s9 c\ld n be condemnable 9 its nature1 if ,god & n man 7 its cause4 ,rob]t ,br[n+1 ,mihrab ,%ah3 8,:]e=e %\ld any evil hap to man--,f a*e ( fle% to agony ( s\l--,s9ce ,god's ,all-m]cy mates ,all-pot5cy8 ,nay1 :y p]mits he evil to himself--man's s91 acc\nt$ su*8 ,suppose a _w purg$ ( all pa91 ) fit inhabitant--,man pure ( evil 9 ?\ght1 ^w & de$--7 x n well8 ,!n1 :]e=e o!rwise80 ,fairbairn answ]s ! "q1 z foll[s1 9 8 ,*ri/ 9 ,mod]n ,!ology1 #def--8;,evil once int5d$ may be vanqui%$ by be+ all[$2 b 7 x h9d]$ by an act ( annihilation1 !n ! victory w\ld re/ ) ! evil :i* _h compell$ ! ,creator to retrace 8 /eps4 ,&1 to c>ry ! prev5tion backw>d ano!r /age1 if ! possibility ( evil _h h9d]$ ! creative action ( ,god1 !n he w\ld h be51 z x 71 ov]come by its v %ad[4 ,b :y did he create a be+ capable ( s9n+8 ,only s c\ld he create a be+ capable ( obey+4 ,! ability to d good implies ! capability ( do+ evil4 ,! eng9e c nei!r obey nor disobey1 & ! creature :o 0 )\t ?is d\ble ability might be a ma*9e1 b c\ld be no *ild4 ,moral p]fection c be atta9$1 b _c be creat$2 ,god c make a be+ capable ( moral action1 b n a be+ ) all ! fruits ( moral action g>n]$ )9 him40 7c7 ,! difficulty is !re=e "o :i* 9 sub/ance cl+s to all !i/ic sy/ems alike--! "q :y moral evil is p]mitt$ "u ! gov]nm5t ( a ,god inf9itely holy1 wise1 p[]ful1 & good4 ,?is problem is1 to our f9ite p[]s1 incapable ( full solution1 & mu/ rema9 to a great degree %r\d$ 9 my/]y4 ,) reg>d to x we c only say3 ,negatively1--t ,god does n p]mit moral evil because he is n unalt]ably oppos$ to s92 nor because moral evil 0 un=ese5 & indep5d5t ( 8 w2 nor because he c\ld n h prev5t$ x 9 a moral sy/em4 ,bo? obs]vation & exp]i5ce1 :i* te/ify to multipli$ in/ances ( deliv]ance f s9 )\t violation ( ! laws ( man's be+1 =bid z to limit ! p[] ( ,god4 ,positively1--we seem con/ra9$ to say t ,god p]mits moral evil because moral evil1 ?\gh 9 itself abhorr5t to 8 nature1 is yet ! incid5t ( a sy/em adapt$ to 8 purpose ( self-revelation2 & fur!r1 because x is 8 wise & sov]eign w to in/itute & ma9ta9 ?is sy/em ( :i* moral evil is an incid5t1 r ?an to )hold 8 self-revelation or to reveal himself ?r\gh ano!r sy/em 9 :i* moral evil %\ld be cont9ually prev5t$ by ! ex]cise ( div9e p[]4 ,!re are f\r que/ions :i* nei!r ,scripture nor reason enables u completely to solve & to :i* we may safely say t only ! high] k ( ! future /ate w furni% ! answ]s4 ,^! que/ions are1 fir/1 h[ c a holy ,god p]mit moral evil8 secondly1 h[ c\ld a be+ creat$ pure ev] fall8 ?irdly1 h[ c we be responsible = inborn depravity8 f\r?ly1 h[ c\ld ,*ri/ ju/ly suff]8 ,! fir/ ( ^! que/ions n[ confronts u4 ,a complete !odicy 71 ,god1 & 1 ju/ice7 w\ld be a v9dication ( ! ju/ice ( ,god 9 p]mitt+ ! natural & moral evil t exi/s "u 8 gov]nm5t4 ,:ile a complete !odicy is beyond our p[]s1 we ?r[ "s light ^u ,god's p]mission ( moral evil by consid]+ 7#a7 t fre$om ( w is necess>y to virtue2 7#b7 t ,god suff]s f s9 m ?an does ! s9n]2 7#c7 t1 ) ! p]mission ( s91 ,god provid$ a r$emption2 &1 7#d7 t ,god w ev5tually ov]rule all evil = good4 ,x is possible t ! elect angels belong to a moral sy/em 9 :i* s9 is prev5t$ by con/ra9+ motives4 ,we _c d5y t ,god c\ld prev5t s9 9 a moral sy/em4 ,b x is v d\btful :e!r ,god c\ld prev5t s9 9 ! be/ moral sy/em4 ,! mo/ p]fect fre$om is indisp5sable to ! atta9m5t ( ! highe/ virtue4 ,spurgeon3 8,!re c\ld h be5 no moral gov]nm5t )\t p]mission to s94 ,god c\ld h creat$ blameless puppets1 b !y c\ld h _h no virtue40 ,behr5ds3 8,if moral be+s 7 incapable ( p]v]sion1 man w\ld h _h all ! virtue ( a planet1--t is1 no virtue at all40 ,s9 0 p]mitt$1 !n1 only because x c\ld be ov]rul$ = ! greate/ good4 ,?is greate/ good1 we may add1 is n simply ! highe/ nobility & virtue ( ! creature1 b also ! revelation ( ! ,creator4 ,b = s91 ,god's ju/ice & ,god's m]cy alike w\ld h be5 un9telligible to ! univ]se4 ,e4 ,g4 ,rob9son3 8,god c\ld n h reveal$ 8 "* s well )\t moral evil z ) moral evil40 ,rob]t ,br[n+1 ,*ri/mas ,eve1 tells u t x 0 ,god's plan to make man 9 8 own image3 8,to create man1 & !n leave him ,able1 8 own ^w sai?1 to grieve him2 ,b able to glorify him too1 ,z a m]e ma*9e c\ld nev] d1 ,t pray$ or prais$1 all unaw>e ,( its fitness = aught b praise or pray]1 ,made p]fect z a ?+ ( c\rse40 ,upton1 ,hibb]t ,lectures1 #bfh-bgj1 #cbd1 holds t s9 & wick$ness is an absolute evil1 b an evil p]mitt$ to exi/ because ! effacem5t ( x w\ld mean ! effacem5t at ! same "t bo? = ,god & man1 ( ! possibility ( rea*+ ! highe/ spiritual good4 ,see also ,m>t9eau1 ,/udy ( ,religion1 #b3ajh2 ,mom]ie1 ,orig9 ( ,evil2 ,/4 ,clair1 ,evil ,physical & ,moral2 ,voysey1 ,my/]y ( ,pa91 ,dea? & ,s94 ,c4 ,g4 ,f9ney1 ,skeletons ( a ,c\rse ( ,!ological ,/udies1 #bf1 #bg--8;,inf9ite goodness1 k & p[] imply only t1 if a univ]se 7 made1 x w\ld be ! be/ t 0 naturally possible40 ,to say t ,god c\ld n be ! au?or ( a univ]se 9 :i* !re is s mu* ( evil1 he says1 8assumes t a bett] univ]se1 ^u ! :ole1 0 a natural possibility4 ,x assumes t a univ]se ( moral be+s c\ld1 "u a moral gov]nm5t adm9i/]$ 9 ! wise/ & be/ mann]1 be :olly re/ra9$ f s92 b ?is ne$s pro(1 & nev] c be prov$4444 ,! be/ possible univ]se may n be ! be/ conceivable univ]se4 ,apply ! legal maxim1 #8,! def5dant is to h ! b5efit ( ! d\bt1 & t 9 proportion to ! e/abli%$ "* ( 8 reputation4' ,!re is s mu* cle>ly indicat+ ! b5evol5ce ( ,god1 t we may believe 9 8 b5evol5ce1 :]e we _c see x40 ,= advocacy ( ! view t ,god _c prev5t evil 9 a moral sy/em1 see ,birks1 ,difficulties ( ,belief1 #ag2 ,"y1 ,! ,my/]y1 or ,evil n f ,god2 ,bl$soe1 ,!odicy2 ,n4 ,w4 ,taylor1 ,moral ,gov]nm5t1 #a3bhh-cdi2 #b3cbg-cef4 ,accord+ to ,dr4 ,taylor's view1 ,god has n a complete control ov] ! moral univ]se2 moral ag5ts c d wrong "u e possible influ5ce to prev5t x2 ,god pref]s1 all ?+s consid]$1 t all 8 creatures %\ld be holy & happy1 & does all 9 8 p[] to make !m s2 ! exi/5ce ( s9 is n on ! :ole = ! be/2 s9 exi/s because ,god _c prev5t x 9 a moral sy/em2 ! bless$ness ( ,god is actually impair$ by ! disob$i5ce ( 8 creatures4 ,= criticism ( ^! views1 see ,tyl]1 ,lett]s on ! ,new ,hav5 ,!ology1 #abi1 #bai4 ,tyl] argues t election & non-election imply p[] 9 ,god to prev5t s92 t p]mitt+ is n m]e submitt+ to some?+ :i* he c\ld n possibly prev5t4 ,we w\ld add t z a matt] ( fact ,god has pres]v$ holy angels1 & t !re are 8j m50 :o h be5 8made p]fect0 7,heb4 #ab3bc7 )\t violat+ ! laws ( moral ag5cy4 ,we inf] t ,god c\ld h s pres]v$ ,adam4 ,! hi/ory ( ! *ur* leads u to believe t !re is no s9n] s /ubborn t ,god _c r5ew 8 he>t1--ev5 a ,saul c be turn$ into a ,paul4 ,we hesitate !re=e to ascribe limits to ,god's p[]4 ,:ile ,dr4 ,taylor held t ,god c\ld n prev5t s9 9 a moral sy/em1 t is1 9 any moral sy/em1 ,dr4 ,p>k is und]/ood to hold ! greatly pref]able view t ,god _c prev5t s9 9 ! be/ moral sy/em4 ,fl9t1 ,*ri/'s ,k+dom ^u ,e>?1 #ei--8,! alt]native is1 n evil or no evil1 b evil or ! miracul\s prev5tion ( evil40 ,see ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3djf-dbb4 ,b ev5 grant+ t ! pres5t is ! be/ moral sy/em1 & t 9 su* a sy/em evil _c be prev5t$ consi/5tly ) ,god's wisdom & goodness1 ! "q /ill rema9s h[ ! decree to initiate su* a sy/em c consi/ ) ,god's fundam5tal attribute ( hol9ess4 ,( ?is insoluble my/]y we mu/ say z ,dr4 ,john ,br[n1 9 ,sp>e ,h\rs1 #bgc1 says ( ,ar?ur ,h4 ,hallam's ,!odica ,novissima3 8,z 0 to be expect$1 ! trem5d\s subject rema9s :]e he f\nd x4 ,8 gl[+ love & g5ius ca/ a gleam "h & !re across its gloom1 b x is z brief z ! lightn+ 9 ! colli$ night--! jaws ( d>kness d dev\r x up--?is secret belongs to ,god4 ,across its deep & dazzl+ d>kness1 & f out its abyss ( ?ick cl\d1 #8all d>k1 d>k1 irrecov]ably d>k1' no /eady ray has ev] or w ev] come2 ov] its face its own d>kness mu/ brood1 till he to :om alone ! d>kness & ! light are bo? alike1 to :om ! night %9e? z ! day1 says #8,let !re be light6' 0 ,we mu/ rememb]1 h[ev]1 t ! decree ( r$emption is z old z ! decree ( ! apo/asy4 ,! provision ( salvation 9 ,*ri/ %[s at h[ great a co/ to ,god 0 p]mitt$ ! fall ( ! race 9 ,adam4 ,he :o orda9$ s9 orda9$ also an atonem5t = s9 & a way ( escape f x4 ,%$d1 ,dogm4 ,!ol41 #a3chh--8,! p]mission ( s9 has co/ ,god m ?an x has man4 ,no sacrifice & suff]+ on acc\nt ( s9 has be5 und]gone by any man1 equal to t :i* has be5 endur$ by an inc>nate ,god4 ,?is %[s t ,god is n act+ selfi%ly 9 p]mitt+ x40 ,on ! p]mission ( moral evil1 see ,butl]1 ,analogy1 ,bohn's ed41 #agg1 #bcb--8,! ,gov]nm5t ( ,god1 & ,*ri/ianity1 z ,s*emes imp]fectly ,compreh5d$02 ,hill1 ,sy/em ( ,div9ity1 #ebh-eei2 ,ulrici1 art43 ,!odice1 9 ,h]zog's ,encyclopdie2 ,cunn+ham1 ,hi/orical ,!ology1 #b3daf-dhi2 ,patton1 on ,retribution & ! ,div9e ,purpose1 9 ,pr9ceton ,rev41 #ahgh3af-bc2 ,bib4 ,sac1 #bj3dga-dhh2 ,wood1 ,! ,witness ( ,s94 ,,iv4 ,conclud+ ,rem>ks4 #a4 ,practical uses ( ! doctr9e ( decrees4 7a7 ,x inspires humility by its repres5tation ( ,god's unse>*able c\nsels & absolute sov]eignty4 7b7 ,x tea*es confid5ce 9 him :o has wisely ord]$ our bir?1 our dea?1 & our surr\nd+s1 ev5 to ! m9ute/ p>ticul>s1 & has made all ?+s "w toge!r = ! triumph ( 8 k+dom & ! good ( ^? :o love him2 7c7 ,x %[s ! enemies ( ,god t1 z _! s9s h be5 =ese5 & provid$ = 9 ,god's plan1 s !y c nev]1 :ile rema9+ 9 _! s9s1 hope to escape _! decre$ & ?reat5$ p5alty4 7d7 ,x urges ! s9n] to avail himself ( ! appo9t$ means ( grace1 if he w\ld be c\nt$ among ! numb] ( ^? = :om ,god has decre$ salvation4 ,?is doctr9e is "o ( ^? advanc$ tea*+s ( ,scripture :i* requires = its und]/&+ a matur$ m9d & a deep exp]i5ce4 ,! beg9n] 9 ! ,*ri/ian life may n see its value or ev5 its tru?1 b ) increas+ ye>s x w become a /aff to lean ^u4 ,9 times ( affliction1 obloquy1 & p]secution1 ! *ur* has f\nd 9 ! decrees ( ,god1 & 9 ! prophecies 9 :i* ^! decrees are publi%$1 h] /rong consolation4 ,x is only ^u ! basis ( ! decrees t we c believe t 8all ?+s "w toge!r = good0 7,rom4 #h3bh7 or pray 8,?y w be done0 7,mat4 #f3aj74 ,x is a /rik+ evid5ce ( ! tru? ( ! doctr9e t ev5 ,arm9ians pray & s+ l ,calv9i/s4 ,*>les ,wesley1 ! ,arm9ian1 c write3 8,he wills t ,i %\ld holy be--,:at c )/& 8 w8 ,! c\nsel ( 8 grace 9 me ,he surely w fulfill40 ,on ! ,arm9ian !ory1 pray] t ,god w s(t5 h>d he>ts is out ( place1--! pray] %\ld be (f]$ to ! s9n]2 = x is 8 w1 n ,god's1 t is 9 ! way ( 8 salvation4 ,& yet ?is doctr9e ( ,decrees1 :i* at fir/ sight might seem to disc\rage ef=t1 is ! greate/1 9 fact is ! only effectual1 inc5tive to ef=t4 ,= ?is reason ,calv9i/s h be5 ! mo/ /r5u\s advocates ( civil lib]ty4 ,^? :o submit !mselves mo/ unres]v$ly to ! sov]eignty ( ,god are mo/ deliv]$ f ! fe> ( man4 ,:itefield ! ,calv9i/1 & n ,wesley ! ,arm9ian1 orig9at$ ! great religi\s movem5t 9 :i* ! ,me?odi/ *ur* 0 born 7see ,mc,fetridge1 ,calv9ism 9 ,hi/ory1 #aec71 & ,spurgeon's m9i/ry has be5 z fruitful 9 conv]sions z ,f9ney's4 ,see ,fr\de1 ,essay on ,calv9ism2 ,&rew ,full]1 ,calv9ism & ,soc9ianism comp>$ 9 _! ,practical ,effects2 ,atwat]1 ,calv9ism 9 ,doctr9e & ,life1 9 ,pr9ceton ,review1 #ahgf3gc2 ,j4 ,a4 ,smi?1 ,hi/orical ,lectures4 ,calv9ism logically requires ! sep>ation ( ,*ur* & ,/ate3 ?\gh ,calv9 did n see ?is1 ! ,calv9i/ ,rog] ,williams did4 ,calv9ism logically requires a republican =m ( gov]nm5t3 ,calv9 introduc$ laym5 into ! gov]nm5t ( ! *ur*1 & ! same pr9ciple requires civil lib]ty z its correlate4 ,calv9ism holds to individualism & ! direct responsibility ( ! individual to ,god4 ,9 ! ,ne!rl&s1 9 ,scotl&1 9 ,engl&1 9 ,am]ica1 ,calv9ism has p[]fully influ5c$ ! developm5t ( civil lib]ty4 ,ranke3 8,john ,calv9 0 virtually ! f\nd] ( ,am]ica40 ,motley3 8,to ! ,calv9i/s m ?an to any o!r class ( m51 ! political lib]ties ( ,holl&1 ,engl& & ,am]ica are due40 ,john ,fiske1 ,! ,beg9n+s ( ,new ,engl&3 8,p]haps n "o ( ! m$ival popes 0 m despotic ?an ,calv92 b x is n ! less true t ! promulgation ( 8 !ology 0 "o ( ! longe/ /eps t mank9d h tak5 t[>ds p]sonal fre$om4444 ,x 0 a religion fit to inspire m5 :o 7 to be call$ to fight = fre$om1 :e!r 9 ! m>%es ( ! ,ne!rl&s or on ! moors ( ,scotl&40 sop1 :5 ask$ :at 0 ! occupation ( ,zeus1 repli$3 8,to humble ! exalt$ & to exalt ! humble40 8,i accept ! univ]se10 said ,m>g>et ,full]4 ,"s "o report$ ?is rem>k to ,?omas ,c>lyle4 8,gad6 %e'd bett]60 he repli$4 ,dr4 ,john ,watson 7,ian ,mc,laren73 8,! greate/ re9=cem5t religion c\ld h 9 our "t w\ld be a return to ! anci5t belief 9 ! sov]eignty ( ,god40 ,:itti]3 8,all is ( ,god t is & is to be1 ,& ,god is good4 ,let ?is suffice u /ill ,re/+ 9 *ildlike tru/ ^u 8 w ,:o moves to 8 great ends un?w>t$ by ! ill40 ,e true m9i/] prea*es ,arm9ianism & prays ,calv9ism4 ,?is means simply t !re is m1 9 ,god's love & 9 ,god's purposes1 ?an man c /ate or compreh5d4 ,bee*] call$ ,spurgeon a camel ) "o hump--,calv9ism4 ,spurgeon call$ ,bee*] a camel )\t any hump3 8,he does n "k :at he believes1 & y nev] "k :]e to f9d him40 ,arm9ians s+3 8,o!r refuge h ,i none2 ,hangs my helpless s\l on !e02 yet ,john ,wesley wrote to ! ,calv9i/ ,toplady1 ! au?or ( ! hymn3 8,y\r ,god is my devil40 ,calv9i/s repli$ t x 0 bett] to h ! ?rone ( ! univ]se vacant ?an to h x fill$ by su* a pitiful non5tity z ! ,arm9ians wor%ip$4 ,x 0 said ( ,"l ,byron t all 8 life he believ$ 9 ,calv9ism1 & hat$ x4 ,oliv] ,w5dell ,holmes simil>ly1 9 all 8 novels except ,elsie ,v5n]1 makes ! or?odox ?9blood$ & weakkne$1 :ile 8 h]etics are all /rong 9 body4 ,dale1 ,ephesians1 #eb--8,( ! two extremes1 ! suppression ( man :i* 0 ! (f5se ( ,calv9ism1 & ! suppression ( ,god :i* 0 ! (f5se aga9/ :i* ,calv9ism s fi]cely prote/$1 ! fault & error ( ,calv9ism 0 ! nobl] & gr&]4444 ,! mo/ h]oic =ms ( human c\rage1 /r5g? & righte\sness h be5 f\nd 9 m5 :o 9 _! !ology seem$ to d5y ! possibility ( human virtue & made ! w ( ,god ! only real =ce 9 ! univ]se40 #b4 ,true me?od ( prea*+ ! doctr9e4 7a7 ,we %\ld mo/ c>efully avoid exagg]ation or unnecess>ily obnoxi\s /atem5t4 7b7 ,we %\ld emphasize ! fact t ! decrees are n gr\nd$ 9 arbitr>y w1 b 9 inf9ite wisdom4 7c7 ,we %\ld make x pla9 t :atev] ,god does or w d1 he mu/ f et]nity h purpos$ to d4 7d7 ,we %\ld illu/rate ! doctr9e s f> z possible by in/ances ( complet5ess & f>-sight$ness 9 human plans ( great ent]prises4 7e7 ,we may !n make ext5d$ application ( ! tru? to ! enc\ragem5t ( ! ,*ri/ian & ! admonition ( ! unbeliev]4 ,= illu/rations ( =esight1 in/ance ,l\is ,napoleon's plann+ ! ,suez ,canal1 & decl>+ 8 policy z ,emp]or1 long be=e he asc5d$ ! ?rone ( ,france4 ,= in/ances ( practical treatm5t ( ! !me 9 prea*+1 see ,bu%nell1 ,s]mon on ,e ,man's ,life a ,plan ( ,god1 9 ,s]mons = ! ,new ,life2 ,nehemiah ,adams1 ,ev5+s ) ! ,doctr9es1 #bdc2 ,spurgeon's ,s]mon on ,ps4 #dd3c--8;,because ?\ had/ a favor unto !m40 ,rob]t ,br[n+1 ,rabbi ,b5 ,ezra3 8,gr[ old along ) me6 ,! be/ is yet to be1 ,! la/ ( life1 = :i* ! fir/ 0 made3 ,our times are 9 8 h& ,:o sai? #8,a :ole ,i plann$1 ,y\? %[s b half2 tru/ ,god3 ,see all nor be afraid6' 0 ,%akespe>e1 ,k+ ,le>1 #a3b--8,?is is ! excell5t fopp]y ( ! _w t :5 we are sick 9 =tune 7(t5 ! surfeit ( our own behavior7 we make guilty ( our disa/]s ! sun1 ! moon & ! />s1 z if we 7 villa9s by necessity1 fools by heav5ly compulsion1 & all t we are evil 9 by a div9e ?ru/+ on2 an admirable evasion ( man to lay 8 disposition to ! *>ge ( a />60 ,all's ,well3 8,our rem$ies (t 9 ourselves d lie ,:i* we ascribe to heav53 ! fat$ sky ,gives u free scope2 only do? backw>d pull ,our sl[ designs1 :5 we ourselves are dull40 ,julius ,cs>1 #a3b--8,m5 at "s "t are ma/]s ( _! fates3 ,! fault1 de> ,brutus1 is n 9 our />s1 ,b 9 ourselves1 t we are und]l+s40