,,transcriber',s ,,notes ,in this e-text1 the following transcriptions are used3 italics are represented between underscores1 bold face text is represented between equals symbols1 and small capitals have been changed to ,,all ,,capitals4 ,more ,transcriber's ,notes may be found at the end of the text4 ,illustration3 ,,plate4 #a4 ,,angularly ,,laminated ,,steel ,,barreled ,,gun ,,laminated ,,steel ,,barreled ,,gun ,,gunnery ,,in #aheh3 ,,being ,a ,,treatise ,,on ,,rifles1 ,,cannon1 ,,and ,,sporting ,,arms2 ,,explaining ,,the ,,principles ,,of ,,the ,,science ,,of ,,gunnery1 ,,and ,,describing ,,the ,,newest ,,improvements ,,in ,,fire-,,arms4 ,,by ,,william ,,greener1 ,c4,e41 ,,inventor ,,of ,,the ,,expansive ,,principle ,,as ,,applied ,,in ,,the ,,minie ,,and ,,enfield ,,rifles1 ,,and ,,author ,,of 8,,the ,,gun10 ,,etc4 ,,etc4 ,,with ,,numerous ,,illustrations4 ,,london3 ,,smith1 ,,elder ,,and ,,co41 #ef1 ,,cornhill4 #aheh4 7,the ,right of ,translation is reserved47 ,,preface4 ,the urgent need for practical information on the important subject of ,gunnery is evinced by the numerous patents taken out during the last few years1 most of which have fallen still-born1 through deficient practical science on the part of the inventors4 ,my aim in producing this book has been to point out the errors into which many ingenious inventors have fallen1 and to show how similar failures may be avoided in future1 by indicating the only right road to improvement in ,gunnery1--the strict observance of scientific principles in every old process and in all new inventions3 for it is to the ignorance or neglect of the principles of the science that failures in ,gunnery are due4 ,the necessity for progress in the science of ,gunnery is now rendered more than ever imperative on our ,government by the prodigious energy and activity of foreign ,governments in providing armaments for land and sea service1 the efficiency of which is ensured by adopting all the newest improvements in fire-arms4 ,but the obstinate reluctance which all our previous ,governments have shown to enter upon the1 to them unwelcome1 duty of investigating and experimenting on warlike inventions1 necessitates strong 8pressure from without20 for it may be truly said that all great improvements in ,gunnery in ,england have been forced upon the authorities by absolute necessity1 and it is still a question whether we shall profit by our recent experiences1 or1 as before1 allow war to find us unprepared4 ,we have1 doubtless1 armaments of gigantic proportions1 and mammoth vessels of war1 capable of discharging an ordinary ship's cargo of shot and shell at a broadside2 yet while millions have been thus expended1 the improvement of the ,gun1 without which they would be mere masses of wood1 and targets for more skilful opponents1 has been neglected4 ,the ,,gun and its ,,projectile will decide the victory in future fights4 ,indeed1 we are even now waging war with our neighbours1--not on the battle-field or the ocean wave1 but in the foundry2 engineers being our generals1 and founders our admirals4 ,the present able ruler of ,france is actively at work1 while we are but looking on3 he is casting cannon the like of which have never been seen1 while we are spending thousands in experimenting on cast-iron and foundries2 and by the time our officials have discovered the best cast-iron for heavy guns1 the ,french batteries on sea and land will be bristling with ,,rifled ,,steel ,,cannon of tremendous range and endless endurance4 ,woe betide this country if at the commencement of a war we should find ourselves just where we are4 ,the ,emperor ,napoleon1 as is well known1 is well versed1 theoretically and practically1 in everything relating to ,gunnery4 ,keenly alive to the minutest points of progress he receives1 investigates1 and immediately adopts all inventions of value2 having the ability to perceive1 the sagacity to appreciate1 and the liberality to reward merit wherever it is shown4 ,compare his system with ours1 where men are placed in official positions1 and entrusted with power1 not because of their ability to fulfil the duties of their office1 but for very inferior and often unworthy reasons2 where talent and fitness are not considered1 and consequently a long routine of forms is made to serve as 8a buffer0 to resist the troublesome pertinacity of inventors1 who are apt to disturb the serenity of reluctant or indifferent officials4 ,and when at last a trial is granted1 the invention is either rejected or approved by incompetent or prejudiced judges4 ,while this practice prevails1 ,england must ever be behindhand in ,gunnery2 for improvements in cannon and projectiles cannot be carried out by private enterprise4 ,in thus strongly expressing my opinion of the way in which progress is balked1 ,i am not merely echoing a cry1 but speaking from my own knowledge and experience4 ,i am actuated by no feeling of disappointment1 for my invention of 8the expansive bullet0 has been at last adopted here1 after it had been copied in ,france4 ,my object is to induce public investigation and inquiry1 and to ventilate this important subject2 and ,i trust that my antecedents1 and the fulfilment of my predictions in matters of ,gunnery1 will give weight to this deliberate and disinterested expression of opinion4 ,the great favour shown by lovers of shooting to my former efforts to disseminate a better understanding of the principles of ,gunnery1 has been an additional stimulus to the production of the present work2 and ,i have taken especial care that my observations should tend to the improvement of sporting arms1 and the increased safety of the sportsman4 ,nor has the ingenious mechanic been overlooked1 for perfection of gun-manufacture must ever go hand in hand with scientific principle2 and the desire to promote their combination has prompted my endeavours to elucidate the subject4 ,leaving to the reader to determine how far ,i have succeeded in my efforts1 ,i merely wish to add that ,i make no pretension to literary style1 but have aimed to produce a practical work for practical men4 ,i have drawn upon my previous works for such portions of information as were needful to give completeness to this view of the science of ,gunnery1 its present state1 and probable future4 ,,william ,,greener4 ,aston ,new ,town1 ,september #crd1 #aheh4 ,,illustrations4 ,,list ,,of ,,plates4 ,plate #a4--,laminated ,steel ,barrels--,to face ,title4 #b4--;,damascus and ,fancy ,steel ,barrels ,to face ,page #bbh #c4--,stub ,twist and ,stub ,damascus ,barrels #bcd #d4--;,charcoal ,iron and 8,threepenny0 ,iron ,barrels #bda #e4--8,twopenny0 ,iron and 8,sham ,damn0 ,iron ,barrels #bdj ,,woodcuts4 ,,page ,cannon of #acij #f ,iron ship gun of #aedj #aj ,paixhan gun and traversing bed #fd ,carronade #fg ,new plan of casting a hollow axle #ie ,mallet's monster mortar #ajj ,russian #ef-pounder #aad ,eight-inch ,british gun #aad ,sixty-eight pound carronade #aaf ,monck's #ef-pounder #aag ,ten-inch or #hf-pounder #aag ,thirteen-inch sea service mortar #aai ,thirteen-inch land service mortar #aai ,welding steel #aee ,wire twist and ,damascus iron #afj ,steel and iron twist #agc ,spirals of ,damascus1 c4 #ahg ,spirals of charcoal and skelp #ahh ,spirals of ,wednesbury and 8sham damn0 iron #ahi ,barrel welding #aia ,method of plating barrels #aie ,boring barrels #aih ,sections of conical breeches1 double barrel #bji ,london and ,birmingham proof marks #bea ,mode of proving guns #bed ,sections of nipples #bhc ,expansive plug bullet #cdc ,enfield barrel and bullet #cgg ,whitworth barrel and bullet #cgg ,swiss bullet #cia ,greener's model carbine #dja ,poly-groove rifle #djc ,tranter's double trigger revolver #dba ,tranter's double action revolver #dbd ,webley's revolver #dbe ,harpoon gun #dcb ,shot tower #dce ,,table ,,of ,,contents4 ,,chapter ,i4--,,ancient ,,arms4 ,,page4 ,the bow--,the sling--,crossbow--,field artillery of the ,normans-- ,artillery of the ancients--,range of the crossbow and longbow--,the ram of ,vespasian--,guns first employed in #acbg--;,guns at the battle of ,cressy--,cannon of #acij--,skill of ,english archers--,defensive armour-- ,portable firearms invented in #adcj--,primitive hand-gun--,iron cannon recovered from the ,mary ,rose1 wrecked in #aede--8;,chambers0--,match- lock and wheel-lock--,fire-lock--,damascus gun-barrels--,birmingham guns--,spanish pistol with magazine--,percussion lock--,the revolving pistol not a new invention--,colt's revolver--,breech-loading guns #a ,,chapter ,,ii4--,,on ,,gunpowder4 ,origin of its invention--,roger ,bacon's recipe--,accidental discovery by a ,german monk--,gunpowder introduced by the ,saracens--,its explosive and propellant properties--,composition of gunpowder--,nitre its essence--,properties of sulphur as an ingredient--,proportions and constituents of ,french gunpowder--,sulphur not always indispensable-- ,chemical principles of its composition--,component parts of different gunpowders--,source of its explosive force--,explosion at ,gateshead-- ,variations in strength and quickness of fire--,granulation of sporting gunpowder and of artillery gunpowder--,importance of suitable granulation for different firearms--,large grain powder the more effectual expellant--,fine powder dangerous--,principle of granulation-- ,gun-cotton--,imperfect instrument for testing gunpowder--,charcoal-- ,operation of making gunpowder described--8,glazing0 detrimental-- ,utility of granulation--,fine grain powder--,dr4 ,ure on the projectile force of gunpowder--,dr4 ,hutton's calculations and experiments--,mode of controlling the destructive force of gunpowder--,experiments to test the velocity of explosive force of different granulations--,the grain should be proportioned to the length and bore of the gun--,chlorate of potassa used by the ,french in making gunpowder--,similar powder proposed by ,mr4 ,parr1 and condemned by ,sir ,william ,congreve--,velocity in projectile force must be gradual--,curious experiment--,operation of blasting stone1 c41 with gunpowder--,english sporting gunpowder-- ,military and naval gunpowder--,fame of ,english gunpowder makers #ah ,,chapter ,,iii4--,,artillery4 ,definition of the term--,modern field gun--,english artillery behind the march of science--,official obstacles to improvement--,various kinds of ,british artillery--,table of measurements1 and range of iron ordnance--,brass guns--,their peculiar property--,firing of brass and iron guns compared--,range of brass ordnance--,paixhan guns--,traversing beds for ship guns--,ranges of ,paixhan guns and howitzers--,mortars-- ,their uses and varieties--,monster mortar at siege of ,antwerp--,table of ,english mortar practice--,carronades--,table of weights of guns and shot --,causes of ,recoil--,guns of our ancestors--,metal required in rear of the breech--,results of ,hutton's experiments--,weight in fore-part of gun injurious--,firm base for a gun essential--,leaden bed for mortars suggested--,new materials desirable for projectiles--,mr4 ,monk's gun unequalled--,principle of its construction--,wilkinson's opinion--,waste of explosive force in ordnance--,the propellant force should be accelerative--,this attainable by a proper granulation of powder-- ,government powder--,gunnery only in its infancy--,compound shot--,lead better than iron for cannon shot--,expenditure of shot at sieges of ,ciudad ,rodrigo and ,badajos--,hutton's experiments--,the shrapnell shell--,improvements in gunnery--,the ,greenerian rifle--,dangerous inefficiency of ,english artillery--,best metal for cannon--,increased range destroys guns--,cause of mortars bursting--,the ,lancaster gun-- ,english cast-iron inferior--,mallet's monster mortar--,wrought-iron unsuited to large guns--,reason why--,shaft of the ,leviathan--,new method of welding iron shafts--,railway carriage axles--,nasmyth's monster cannon--,light gun-barrels stronger than heavy ones--,brass guns inferior to cast-iron--,defect of hoop and stave gun--,form and dimensions of ,mallet's monster mortar 7with engraving7--,cause of deterioration of ,english cast-iron--,russian cast-iron more durable1 and why--,krupp's steel gun--,laminated steel gun-barrels--,captain ,dalgren's improvements in ,american ordnance--,russian guns--,reinforce rings and trunnions objectionable1 and why--,rifled cannon essential-- ,range of steel rifled cannon--,best form of gun--,professor ,barlow on the strength of iron--,our artillery not constructed on scientific principles--,russian #ef-pounder1 ,english #h-;inch gun1 ,english carronade1 ,monck's #ef-pounder1 and #aj-;inch gun 7with cuts7--,land and sea service mortars 7with cuts7--,joseph ,manton's rifle cannon--,projectiles for rifled cannon--,rifle rockets--,mr4 ,whitworth's improvements in rifled guns--,his polygonal projectile--,experiments with ,mr4 ,armstrong's field-piece--,increased range and accuracy of rifled cannon with elongated projectiles--,table of comparative range of smooth-bored and rifled cannon--,shells for rifled cannon--,spiral motion of projectiles from smooth-bored guns--,breech-loading cannon useless and unsafe #eh ,,chapter ,,iv4--,,manufacture ,,of ,,iron ,,for ,,gun-,,barrels4 ,improvement in gun barrels depends on the iron--,continental manufacturers advance while ,english stand still--,cheap and inferior guns of 8,park-paling0--,scarcity of horse-nail stubs--,importance of iron manufacture--,great value of steel in ancient times--,iron originally made with wood charcoal--,coal coke unfit for making best iron--,british iron ore inferior--,mr4 ,mushet on steel-iron--,english workmen employed abroad--,english gun-makers' names forged in ,belgium-- ,indian ,iron and ,steel ,company--,indian process of making steel--,hammer- hardening recommended--,difference of 8,silver steel0 and 8,twist steel0 --,method of making laminated steel--,it is spoilt by over-twisting-- ,watering of ,damascus barrels--,proportions of carbon in steel and iron --,damascus barrels often plated--,modern method of making ,damascus iron 7with cuts7--,objection to wire-twist iron--,figured barrels--,damascus barrels made in ,belgium--,damascus iron inferior in strength--,use of old horse-shoe nails for gun-barrels--,stub iron alone insufficient-- ,prejudices of provincial gun-makers--,mixture of steel and stub iron-- ,importance of welding on an air furnace--,proportions of steel and stub iron--,efficacy of hammer-hardening and reworking iron--,improvements in superior iron owing to gun-makers--,explosions of steam-boilers owing to neglect or bad construction--,boiler iron improveable--,steel- ,damascus barrel iron--,manufacture of 8charcoal iron0--,imitation of 8smoke brown0--,gains from using inferior iron--,frauds in barrel making --,advice of ,edward ,davies in #afai--8,threepenny skelp iron0-- 8,wednesbury skelp0--,test of a safe gun--8,sham damn skelp0--,base guns made to sell--,their injurious effect on the gun-making trade--8,swaff- iron forging40 #adf ,,chapter ,v4--,,gun-,,making4 ,barrel welding--,birmingham welders--,different twists of metal 7illustrated with cuts7--,process of welding--,hammer-hardening--,belgium welders--,mode of plating barrels--,belgium method 7with cut7--,profits of fraud--,qualifications of a good gun-barrel maker--,processes of boring and grinding--,proper inclination of double barrels--,elevation of barrels should be proportionate to charge and distance--,brazing of barrels detrimental--,mr4 ,wilkinson's opinion--,solid ribs requisite-- ,advantage of the patent breech--,best shape of breech 7with cut7--,gun locks--,their scientific construction--,the ,barside lock--,messrs4 ,braziers' locks--,the stock1 fittings1 c4--,recipe for staining steel barrels--,birmingham method of browning--,belgian method--,varieties of iron for best barrels--,laminated steel barrels never known to burst-- ,base imitations of laminated steel--,cost of laminated steel barrels-- ,author's method of laminating--,stub ,damascus passed off for steel-- ,birmingham guns--,practice of forging names of eminent makers--,author's offer--,improved metal for axles--,author's imitation ,damascus 7with plate7--,joseph ,manton's merits--,prize medals awarded to author-- ,advantages of ,birmingham for gun making--8,london-made guns0--,foreign imitations of ,english guns--,periodical exhibition of guns recommended --,steel-twist and stub ,damascus 7with plate7--,barrels of charcoal iron--,inferior guns--,cost of skelp-iron guns--,cost of 8sham damn iron0 guns--,sham guns 7with plate7--,cost of 8park-paling0 guns #ahe ,,chapter ,,vi4--,,the ,,proof ,,of ,,gun ,,barrels4 ,proof-house of ,gun-maker's ,company--,proof ,acts of #ahac and #ahae-- ,provisions of ,gun ,barrel ,proof ,act of #ahee--,penal clauses--,schedule ,b --,proof marks--,scale of charges for ,proof--,mode of proving 7with cut7 --,number of barrels proved in #aheg #bdc ,,chapter ,,vii4--,,the ,,science ,,of ,,gunnery4 ,new principle--,improved rifles--,useless inventions--,scientific principles of gunnery3 #a4 ,the explosive power and its velocity4 #b4 ,the retarding agents4 #c4 ,construction of the tube4 #d4 ,form of projectile-- ,robins's theory--,hutton's experiments--,suitable velocity the germ of the science--,author's experiments and their results--,penetrating power of bullets--,resistance of the atmosphere--,friction detrimental-- ,construction of the tube--,the ,cylindro-conoidal form best suited for projectiles--,jacob's and ,whitworth's bullets--,lengthened projectiles tend to burst the barrel--,amount of heat needful to explode gunpowder --,advantage of unglazed powder--,percussion powder--,best form of nipple 7with cuts7--,propellant velocity the grand desideratum--,why short guns shoot better than long ones--,true science of gunnery--,cause of guns bursting--,mr4 ,blaine's difference of opinion with the author on explosive force--,shooting powers of different gun barrels--,tables of strength and pressure--,colonel ,hawker's axiom--,mr4 ,daniel's remarks on shot--,duck and swivel guns--,the wire cartridge--,bell-muzzle guns--,mr4 ,blaine on long barrels--,the just medium--,belgium guns will not stand ,english proof--,cause of their inferiority--,french gun-makers behind the age--,author's notes on the 8,specimens by ,french ,gun-makers at the ,paris ,exhibition0--,on recoil in shooting--,causes and experiments--,mode of determining the size of shot suited to the bore of gun--,mr4 ,prince's double gun #beg ,,chapter ,,viii4--,,the ,,french 8,,crutch10 ,,or ,,breech-,,loading ,,shot ,,gun4 ,breech-loading fire-arms unsafe and inferior--,objections specified-- ,trial of breech-loading against muzzle-loading guns--,danger from using breech-loaders--,excessive recoil #cbi ,,chapter ,,ix4--,,the ,,rifle4 ,robins's prediction verified--,barrels first rifled at ,vienna in #adih-- ,earliest elongated bullets--,captain ,delvigne's bullet--,the author's expansive bullet--,his memorial to the ,board of ,ordnance--,report of its trial by the #fjth ,rifles in #ahcf--;,decision of the ,board of ,ordnance-- ,progress of the author's invention--,captain ,delvigne's patent of #ahdb --,captain ,mini's bullet of #ahdg--,unsuccessful attempts of author to have his claim to the invention of the expansive bullet recognised by ,government--,secret report of ,select ,committee on his invention--,his priority admitted by the ,emperor ,napoleon--,the ,british ,government award the author #a1jjjl4 for his invention--,principle of the expansive rifle bullet--,projectiles may be lengthened with increase of range--,action of the expansive bullet--,defects of the ,mini bullet-- ,colonel ,hay's improvement--,author's experiments1 and their result-- ,spiral curve of the rifle barrel--,failure of the 8,pritchett bullet0-- ,captain ,tamissier's theory--,mini and ,greenerian bullet contrasted 7with cuts7--,author's improvement of #aheb 7with cut7--,general ,jacob's bullet 7with cuts7--,remarks of ,lieutenant ,symons--,the ,whitworth rifle --,its defects--,report of trial of the ,whitworth and ,enfield rifles-- ,author's comments thereon 7with cuts7--,importance of safety from accident--,the expansive bullet can be made superior to the ,whitworth-- ,fallacy of experiments--,comparative cost of ammunition for the ,whitworth and ,enfield rifles--,defective cartridges--,hints to obviate defects--,vital principle of elongated projectiles--,a hollow bullet proposed1 its defects--,the ,swiss bullet--,doubtful utility of the deepening groove--,government rifle1 with sword bayonet--,double rifles --,hints on rifle shooting--,author's expanding screw bands--,mr4 ,prince's breech-loading carbine--,revolving rifles--,french school of rifle practice--,english school of rifle shooting at ,hythe--,double rifled carbines recommended--,revolvers costly and fragile--,lieutenant ,kerr's opinion of the ,enfield or ,greener's carbine--,government pistol and carbine--,efficient arms of the ,irregular ,cavalry of ,india--,first use of greased cartridges in ,india--,the three-grooved and poly-grooved rifle 7with cut7--,spherical bullets indispensable to smooth bored muskets--,length and bore of military rifle--,elliptical bored rifle-- ,mr4 ,lancaster's bullet superseded by the ,greenerian bullet--,report of committee on ,lancaster's rifle--,the oval bore not a new invention-- ,inferiority of the two-grooved or ,brunswick rifle--,the ,prussian needle gun--,enfield rifles made for ,france1 ,russia1 and other states of ,europe--,trials of ,whitworth and ,enfield rifles--,unsatisfactory results of the ,whitworth rifle #cch ,,chapter ,x4--,,revolving ,,pistols4 ,immense demand for them--,their value--,best manufacturers--,colonel ,colt's repeating pistol described--,its double action discussed-- ,machine-made pistols not equal to hand-made--,dean and ,adams's revolver described--,its improvements on ,colt's--,tranter's double trigger revolver--,his lubricating bullet and other improvements--,webley's revolver--,comparison of self-acting and cocking-lock pistols-- ,tendency of revolvers to foul--,lieut4 ,symons's opinion--,other defects to be overcome--,author's preference for double-barrelled fire-arms in warfare #dac ,,chapter ,,xi4--,,enfield ,,rifles4 ,the name explained1 and weapon described--,its origin--,author's share in its construction--,american machinery for gun-making--,extent and products of the ,enfield manufactory #dbi ,,chapter ,,xii4--,,the ,,harpoon-,,gun ,,for ,,whale-,,shooting4 #dcb ,,chapter ,,xiii4--,,shot1 ,,caps1 ,,and ,,wadding4 #dce ,,rifles1 ,,cannon1 ,,and ,,sporting ,,arms4 ,,chapter ,i4 ,,ancient ,,arms4 ,from the earliest ages of the world1 the jealousies and bickerings of mankind have been fruitful causes of war4 ,sometimes1 perhaps1 justified by political reasons2 at others1 it may be1 arising solely from a desire1 on the part of ambitious chiefs1 to extend their territories by multiplying their conquests2 while1 in too many cases1 the struggle for religious ascendancy has led to the most sanguinary and cruel battles4 ,war has been considered as a science from the most remote ages1 and the ingenuity of the talented has successively been taxed to render it as perfect as possible4 ,it is true-- 8,man's earliest arms were fingers1 teeth1 and nails1 ,and stones and fragments from the branching woods20 but these soon gave place to others1 more calculated to decide unequal1 and often protracted1 conflicts4 ,arms1 in a general sense1 include all kinds of weapons1 both offensive and defensive2 and amongst the earliest may be classed the bow and arrow1 as it gave facilities to man to capture the wild animals for food1 probably before their use was required for the purposes of war4 ,the bow and the sling were the first means invented1 and next only to the human arm for projecting bodies with an offensive aim3 the great principle which1 to the present day1 reigns unrivalled1 developing the ruling passion of man to injure1 while remaining himself in comparative safety1--8self-preservation0 being 8the first law of nature40 ,to the bow and sling were soon added spears1 swords1 axes1 and javelins1 all of which appear to have been used by the ,jews4 ,david destroyed ,goliath with a stone from the brook4 ,the invention of the sling is attributed1 by ancient writers1 to the ,phnicians1 or the inhabitants of the ,balearic ,islands4 ,the great fame that these islanders obtained arose from their assiduity in its use2 their children were not allowed to eat until they struck their food from the top of a pole with a stone from a sling4 ,from the accounts left us 7probably fabulous71 it appears that the immense force with which a stone could be projected1 can only be exceeded by modern gunnery4 ,even at that early age1 leaden balls were in use as projectiles2 though we cannot put much faith in ,seneca's account of the velocity being so great as frequently to melt the lead4 ,the use of the sling continued over a long period of time1 even as late as the ,huguenot war in #aegb4 ,the bow is of equal1 if not greater1 antiquity4 ,the first account we find of it is in ,genesis1 #bast chapter and #bjth verse1 where the ,lawgiver1 speaking of ,ishmael1 says1 8,and ,god was with the lad1 and he grew and dwelt in the wilderness1 and became an archer40 ,the arms of the ancient ,greeks and ,persians were such as we have described1 with the addition of chariots armed with scythes1 in which the chiefs sometimes fought2 though their main dependence was upon their heavy-armed infantry4 ,elephants were afterwards used as adjuncts in their military operations1 but their use does not appear to have been very great or very permanent4 ,the ,romans were armed much in the same manner as the ,greeks1 with a slight difference in the form of their weapons2 and the arms of the early ,saxons were similar2 those of the ,normans were only altered in their construction1 except that to them appears to be awarded the invention of the cross-bow1 an instrument which afterwards became of great repute in ,england and elsewhere4 ,it has also been asserted1 that the ,normans were the first to introduce a species of field artillery1 from which stones and darts were thrown1 and arrows1 headed with combustible matter1 for firing towns and shipping4 ,the artillery-proper of the ancients1 as the engines for projecting masses of stone and such like materials may be termed1 reached to wonderful perfection2 and the velocity with which missiles of every description could be thrown from them1 attest the skill and ingenuity exercised in their construction3 indeed it is quite evident they are only excelled by the more portable1 and simply constructed1 artillery of our own day4 ,the great artillerist of the ,sicilians1 ,archimedes1 seems to have made some of the most powerful engines2 but he1 considering any attention to mechanics as beneath the philosopher1 has not left us an account of any one of them4 ,it is said of the cross-bow that a quarrel could be projected from them #bjj yards1 so that we may imagine the force with which one of these lumps of iron would strike even the strongest armour1--as the velocity1 to range that distance1 would not be far short of #ijj or #a1jjj feet per second2 nearly equal to the effect of a ball from one of our old imperfectly constructed muskets4 ,we are told incredible stories of the abilities of some of our bygone archers4 ,should it be true1 as stated1 that an arrow could be shot nearly #gjj yards1 we can easily conceive the immense velocity with which it must have left the bow2 this range being quite equal1 if not superior1 to that of the late unimproved rifles4 ,though we must bear in mind1 that the peculiar shape of the arrow fits it to cut the atmosphere with less resistance then the half sphere of a bullet2 and hence one reason of its obtaining an extensive range4 ,there is a story told of the famous ,robin ,hood1 and ,little ,john1 8who could shoot an arrow a measured mile40 ,we suppose the mile was the reverse of an ,irish one1 or they had the advantage of a precious stiff gale of wind4 ,historians sometimes 8draw the long-bow0 as well as archers4 ,many statements have descended to us of the power of the battering rams of old2 but we have a much more ready method of blowing open gates by a single bag of gunpowder2 and a #fh lb4 shot has all the force that could be given even to that famous ram of ,vespasian1 8the length whereof was only fifty cubits1 which came not up to the size of many of the ,grecian rams1 had a head as thick as ten men1 and twenty-five horns1 each of which was as thick as one man1 and placed a cubit distance from the rest2 the weight1 as was customary1 rested on the hinder part1 and was no less than #a1ejj talents2 when it was removed1 without being taken to pieces1 #aej yoke of oxen1 or #cjj pairs of horses and mules1 laboured in drawing it1 and #a1ejj men employed their utmost strength in forcing it against the walls40 ,with these remarks we shall proceed to introduce the invention of ,gunnery4 ,barbour1 in his life of ,bruce1 informs us that guns were first employed by the ,english at the battle of ,werewater1 which was fought in #acbg1 about forty years after the death of ,friar ,bacon2 and there is no doubt that four guns were used at the battle of ,cressy1 fought in #acdf1 when they were supposed to have been quite unknown to the ,french1 and tended to obtain for ,british arms the victory4 ,froissart gives an excellent representation of a cannon and cannoneers1 in #acij1 a cut of which we give in the following page4 ,the use of guns in warfare is1 therefore1 comparatively of modern date1 and the early specimens which are still extant1 of which we have drawings and descriptions1 must have been of very little service compared with those of the present day4 ,the ,english musqueteer was formerly a most encumbered soldier4 8,he had1 besides the unwieldy weapon itself1 his coarse powder for loading in a flask1 his fine powder for priming in a touch-box1 his bullets in a leathern bag1 with strings to draw to get at them1 whilst in his hand were his musket-rest and his burning match2 and when he had discharged his piece1 he had to draw his sword in order to defend himself4 ,hence it became a question1 and was so for a long time1 whether the bow did not deserve a preference over the musket40#a #a ,grose's 8,military ,antiquities40 ,illustration3 ,froisart's ,gun4 #acij4 ,the mention of the long-bow is frequent in ,english history1 and its use contributed1 in no mean degree1 to many important victories4 ,perhaps it might be that our forefathers were more skilful in the use of their weapons than their adversaries4 ,in our wars in ,france1 in the reign of ,edward ,,iii41 thousands suffered by the ,english archery2 and the brilliant success which attended them was1 at that time1 attributed to their 8superior skill1 combined with the valour of the ,black ,prince40 ,so highly was this practice esteemed1 that many statutes were enacted in successive reigns to encourage or enforce it4 ,archery furnished matter for oratorical display1 both in the senate and the pulpit2 the palace and the cottage alike bore testimony to the great importance which was attached to the art2 and it was at once the study and pastime of the whole nation4 ,thus1 long after the introduction of fire-arms1 the long-bow was held in great esteem2 and it is no wonder that this favourite instrument should have been reluctantly relinquished1 after obtaining such universal popularity1 and becoming so intimately connected with many national and important events4 ,it is now superseded by the gun1 a more potent and destructive engine4 ,the bow1 so much valued1 has vanished from our ranks by slow gradations1 to make way for the musket2 and the quivers of cloth-yard shafts have been supplanted by bristling bayonets4 ,these things are now practically unknown as military weapons1 though they contended for superiority with fire-arms during two centuries4 ,at this period1 and for a long time previously1 more attention was paid to the fabrication of defensive armour1 than to the invention of weapons of an offensive character2 hence the perfection that was attained in the manufacture of mail1 of every variety1 during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries4 ,the splendid manner in which some of the chivalrous knights of that age chose to have their armour constructed and ornamented sometimes proved fatal to themselves4 ,froissart relates that ,raymond1 nephew to ,pope ,clement1 was taken prisoner1 and put to death by his captors1 in order that they might become possessed of his magnificent armour4 ,those gorgeous and costly fabrications were likewise doomed to give place to the advancing knowledge and skill of succeeding generations2 being now only known as matters of history1 and regarded as valuable curiosities4 ,so late1 however1 as the latter part of the sixteenth century1 armour formed part of the military equipment2 and the ,french cavalry1 called carabins1 are described as having the cuirass sloped off the right shoulder1 that they might the more readily couch their cheeks to take aim1 while their bridle arms were protected by an elbow gauntlet4 ,the invention of portable fire-arms is awarded to the ,italians by ,sir ,samuel ,meyrick1 and1 in a memoir in the ,archologia of the ,society of ,antiquarians1 he has named the year #adcj as the precise period of their introduction4 ,we have already stated that cannon1 or heavy ordnance1 was in use in the ,english army in #acbg1 more than a century before that time4 ,it is not improbable1 however1 that the ,italians were the originators of small fire-arms1 for they had for many years been celebrated as skilful in the art of making armour--,milanese armour being considered the most valuable1 and it is natural that their attention should be directed to the construction of offensive weapons of a different description4 ,the invention of the portable fire-arm1 in its primitive state1 was one of extreme simplicity2 the gun consisting merely of a tube fixed to a straight stock of wood1 about three feet in length1 furnished with trunnions1 cascable1 and touch-hole3 the latter was1 in the first instance1 at the top1 like a large cannon1 but was afterwards altered to the side where a small pan was placed to hold the priming1 and lessen the liability of its being blown away by the wind4 ,this contrivance was the first step to the gun-lock4 ,before the adoption of the match-lock by the ,english1 cannon1 as ,i have before shown1 had been in use1 though they were of a clumsy description4 ,illustration ,to the indefatigable exertions of ,mr4 ,dean1 we are indebted for the recovery of several brass and iron guns1 belonging to the 8,mary ,rose10--a vessel of war1 wrecked in the reign of ,henry ,,viii4 of ,england1 and ,francis ,i4 of ,france1 in #aede3 8while standing along the coast1 during a distant firing from the ,french fleet1 under ,admiral ,annebout1 she was overpowered by the weight of her ordnance1 and sunk1 together with her commander and crew of #fjj men40 ,one of these iron guns is in an excellent state of preservation1 considering it to have been immersed above #cjj years4 ,the cut on next page will convey1 together with the following description1 a faint idea of its unwieldy and inefficient construction4 ,it is composed of a tube of iron1 whose joint or overlap is as its length2 upon this is a succession of iron hoops1 composed of iron three inches square1 being in fact immense rings2 these appear to have been driven on while red hot1 and thus1 by their contraction1 forming a much stronger gun1 when combined with the interior tube1 than the generality of accounts given of ancient guns would lead us to expect4 ,it will be perceived1 that to describe it as 8composed of iron bars hooped together10 is not correct4 ,we may also mention1 that if parties describing guns of this primitive manufacture will observe accurately1 they will find that this is the general method by which they have been fabricated4 ,they all appear to have been loaded by removing a breech part1 or chamber1 inserting the charge1 replacing the chamber1 and securing it by wedging it behind2 as will be seen on a close inspection4 ,no means of raising or depressing the muzzle appear available2 the barrel or gun being sunk in a large block of timber1 and secured there by bolts1 as a musket barrel is secured in its stock2 while a large piece of iron1 or wood1 was inserted perpendicularly into the deck to prevent the recoil4 ,the advantage of 8chambers0 was perfectly understood even at this early period2 they were apparently slightly conical1 with a spherical bottom4 ,it is no mean evidence of ancient skill1 and knowledge of gunnery and mechanics combined1 to state1 that only a few years ago1 a gunmaker of some celebrity1 constructed a number of rifles and pistols to load at the breech1 on the very same principle adopted in this gun #cab years ago4 ,strange1 evidence from 8the vasty deep0 to show 8there is nothing new under the sun40 ,during the sixteenth century1 fire-arms of every description then in use underwent a variety of alterations and improvements2 each change bringing with it a change of name1 which would neither be profitable or interesting to enumerate here2 our object being to trace out the advances which have been made in the manufacture of fire-arms since their general adoption as weapons of war1 or auxiliaries to the sports of the field4 ,when first introduced into ,england1 the hand-gun1 as it was termed1 had already received a slight improvement1 in having a covering for the pan which contained the priming1 and a sight on the breech1 to assist in giving greater certainty to the aim2 it remained thus until the trigger of the cross-bow suggested a contrivance to convey1 with equal certainty and greater rapidity1 the burning match to the pan4 ,the difficulty of using an instrument thus objectionably constructed1 was in some degree obviated by the ,germans2 who1 together with the ,italians1 were no doubt at this early period the principal manufacturers2 they effected this1 to a certain degree1 by giving the stocks a crooked form1 so that the breech could1 with more ease1 be brought to the level of the eye2 this was1 however1 only an alteration of form1 without involving any principle or leading feature of mechanical invention4 ,succeeding the match-lock1 in the progress of improvement1 came the 8pyrites wheel-lock10 an invention then looked upon as exceedingly curious and ingenious2 this also is ascribed to the ,italians1 and one of the first occasions of its being used1 is said to have been when ,pope ,leo ,x4 and the ,emperor ,charles ,v4 confederated against ,france4 ,whether the ,italians are fairly entitled to the merit of this invention is1 however1 a matter of doubt1 as it is well known that wheel-locks were for a long period manufactured in ,germany4 ,the 8snaphaunce0 or fire-lock1 is distinctly stated by ,grose to be of ,dutch origin1--hence the name4 ,it was introduced into ,england in the reign of ,charles ,,ii41 though its general adoption is stated not to have taken place until the reign of ,william ,,iii41 about #afib4 ,since that period1 until the present1 their use has been general in all the armies of ,europe4 ,how strange it seems that the ,chinese and other ,asiatics should have only the match-lock to the present day1 while there can be no question that they used gunpowder some centuries before its introduction into our portion of the habitable globe6 ,the ,syrians were formerly celebrated for their skill in the working of iron4 ,damascus gun-barrels were not to be obtained1 at certain periods1 at a price less than their weight in silver4 ,the elaborate mixtures in their barrels1 swords1 and other weapons1 entitle them justly to the honour of being the best of iron workers1 as we shall hereafter have occasion to show2 and the splendour displayed in their inlaying attests their taste and ability3 but as mechanicians1 formers of complex machinery1 they never reached mediocrity4 ,turkey and ,greece1 as well as other countries which were renowned as having been1 in days of yore1 nurseries of the arts1 but which have1 in later times1 degenerated into a condition little better than semi-barbarous1 were remarkable for the great labour and pains which they bestowed upon the exterior ornaments of their firearms2 but they never succeeded in improving the machinery of the lock in the slightest degree4 ,although it was not until the latter part of the seventeenth1 or the beginning of the eighteenth century1 that gun manufactories were established in this kingdom1 yet we have attained to a degree of perfection and excellence unequalled by any other nation in the world4 ,birmingham is the emporium of the world for guns1 from the most inferior--the 8park paling10 so called1 of the slave-trade1 with which ships might yet be freighted at the cost of eight shillings and sixpence each--up to the elaborately-finished gun of the peer4 ,most of the alterations which have been made in gun-locks in ,england1 have been with a view to simplify the machinery1 and obtain the greatest quickness in firing3 much complication has been discarded2 a thorough conviction having seated itself in the minds of ,englishmen1 that to attain perfection1 simplicity must be combined4 ,many splendid emanations of genius are left to us1 consisting of complex mechanism for gunnery4 ,the most perfect we have ever seen1 is a pistol made in ,spain about the end of the seventeenth century4 ,by moving a lever towards the butt-end1 while the muzzle is depressed1 the lock is primed1 half-cocked1 and the hammer shut down2 return the lever1 the powder is in the breech1 and the ball before it4 ,we have seen it fire twenty-six shots without a failure1 and with one supply of ammunition4 ,the magazine was in two tubes in the stock4 ,the chance of blowing up was thought remote2 but it eventually blew up4 ,in short1 it would be strictly advantageous to inventors in gunnery1 to be sure that there has been no previous invention combining their principle as well as their arrangements4 ,the mine of complex inventions was exhausted during the last century2 and the greatest benefactor to the science of gunnery will be he1 who1 blowing away the cobwebs of mystery1 renders its principles as clear as the silvered glass4 ,nothing now remains of the beautiful machinery of the flint lock2 the fancy cock and hammers have given place to a 8simple0 hammer1 striking on a copper thimble1 covering a steel pivot4 ,what would the old lock-filers say to this1 if they could return and see their handiwork consigned to the scrap-box as old iron8 ,to those curious in the progress of invention as it relates to gunnery1 it would be highly interesting to visit the 8,muse d',artillerie0 of ,paris1 and there to study the classified selections in the possession of the ,french ,government4 ,among other specimens equally interesting1 he will find revolving pistols1 revolving rifles1 and swords and revolving pistols combined in one2 and these produced in the early part of the seventeenth century4 ,the revolving pistol did not therefore originate with the present generation2 and however universally we may use the 8,colt10 8,adams10 or 8,tranter10 neither can lay the slightest claim to originality4 ,in that museum will be found four1 five1 and six charge chambers2 and though in all there is certainly an absence of movement in the chamber1 produced by the cocking of the lock1 yet several present the appearance of having formerly had some mechanical adjunct for revolving the chamber3 this1 though well adapted to the present percussion system1 must certainly have been troublesome to manage in the old flint lock2 for when the first barrel was discharged1 the priming of the other barrels would be lost during the revolution of the chamber4 ,a great improvement was1 however1 soon introduced2 a hammer and pan were attached to each division of the chamber1 and each being already primed1 presented itself in rotation in the face of the flint4 ,the gun or pistol was by these protuberances rendered clumsy and cumbersome1 and thus fell1 no doubt1 into disuse2 but every real mechanic must see on investigating the subject1 that the principle was as perfect as that which is now in use4 ,mr4 ,colt had considerable difficulty in securing a patent for his revolver4 ,the right of patent hinged on this simple question3 did he1 or did he not1 first introduce a crank or lever for revolving the chambers during the cocking of the lock8 ,after an expensive trial it was decided that he did introduce it2 though doubts are still entertained whether there is not now extant a pistol having the same crank movement as that found in the 8,colt0 and other revolvers4 ,at all events the invention of revolving pistols originated with our progenitors1 more than #bjj years ago1 though their re-introduction is unquestionably due to ,mr4 ,colt2 and the 8old broth warmed up0 has no doubt proved more nutritious than the original concoction4 ,in the ,paris museum1 a number of breech-loading guns are to be seen2 ,i think more than sixty varieties4 ,many of them are highly ingenious1 displaying great mechanical knowledge and working skill1 and the whole1 kept in splendid order1 cannot fail to command attention4 ,well had it been if the many hundred inventors in ,england and elsewhere had studied1 and made themselves intimately acquainted with the productions there to be seen in such abundance4 ,monuments they are of mis-spent skill and labour2 samples of the almost hopeless task of fabricating complicated machinery which shall resist the action of explosive gases at high pressure4 ,an experiment extending over two hundred years1 but unattended with success1 notwithstanding all the skill and ingenuity brought to bear upon it1 is1 we think1 sufficient to prove that breech-loading guns cannot be made sufficiently durable to yield any reasonable return for the extra expense and trouble attending their fabrication4 ,nevertheless1 our 8would-be mechanics hope against hope20 and to such we would1 in conclusion1 tender a word of advice4 ,before spending your money1 make acquaintance 7and an intimate one is necessary7 with all that has been done before1 and if in your own production you find principles which have been untouched by any previous invention1 and untainted by any of the previous causes of failure1 then patent your invention1 and make a fortune--if you can4 ,great mechanical skill1 and even scientific principles1 are to be found in some of the earliest productions after the invention of fire-arms2 and thus is established the important fact1 that want of experience was the chief drawback under which they laboured3 one elaborate machine being unequal to their requirements was succeeded by another2 and yet1 with all these examples patent to us1 we still fruitlessly fall back on exhausted principles4 ,a more intimate knowledge of what our predecessors have accomplished would be a great boon to our race4 ,foreign nations1 but especially ,france1 have provided for this by their museums2 and we want here a museum of progression1 an epitome of the mind of the present age1 and which1 continued to future generations1 would leave to no man the fruitless toil of hauling in an endless rope4 ,,chapter ,,ii4 ,,on ,,gunpowder4 ,gunpowder being the base on which the superstructure of this treatise is to be raised1 the history1 the use1 and the nature of this explosive compound1 are here placed in the foreground2 as it is essential to the correct conception of the various matters hereafter to be explained1 that the reader be first acquainted with the one grand principle in fire-arms1 the propellant power of explosion4 ,gunpowder1 whether considered relatively to engines of war1 or to those arms used with so much success in the sporting field1 has1 since its first introduction1 been a source of much and frequent discussion4 ,in regard to its origin1 we shall not much enlarge1 nor repeat the many suppositions and conjectures promulgated by the searchers after antiquarian evidence4 ,the inhabitants of ,india were unquestionably acquainted with its composition at an early date4 ,alexander is supposed to have avoided attacking the ,oxydracea1 a people dwelling between the ,hyphasis and ,ganges1 from a report of their being possessed of supernatural means of defence3 8,for10 it is said1 8they come not out to fight those who attack them1 but those holy men1 beloved by the gods1 overthrow their enemies with tempests and thunderbolts shot from their walls20 and1 when the ,egyptian ,hercules and ,bacchus overran ,india1 they attacked these people1 8but were repulsed with storms of thunderbolts and lightning hurled from above40 ,this is1 no doubt1 evidence of the use of gunpowder2 but as it is unprofitable to investigate this subject further1 we shall merely confine ourselves to the ,european authorities4 ,many ascribe the discovery of gunpowder to ,roger ,bacon1 the monk1 who was born at ,ilchester1 in ,somersetshire1 in the year #abad1 and is said to have died in #abhe4 ,no doubt he was by far the most illustrious1 the best informed1 and the most philosophical of all the alchemists4 ,in the #fth chapter of his ,epistles of the ,secrets of ,arts1 the following passage occurs--8,for sounds like thunder1 and flashes like lightning1 may be made in the air1 and they may be rendered even more horrible than those of nature herself4 ,a small quantity of matter1 properly manufactured1 and not larger than the human thumb1 may be made to produce a horrible noise2 and this may be done many ways1 by which a city or an army may be destroyed1 as was the case when ,gideon and his men broke their pitchers and exhibited their lamps1 fire issuing out of them with great force and noise1 destroying an infinite number of the army of the ,midianites40 ,and in the #aath chapter of the same epistle occurs the following passage3--8,mix together saltpetre with luru mone cap ubre1 and sulphur1 and you will make thunder and lightning1 if you know the method of mixing them40 ,here all the ingredients of gunpowder are mentioned1 except charcoal2 which is1 doubtless1 concealed under the barbarous terms used2 indeed1 the anagram is easily converted into carbonum pulvere1 with a little attention4 ,this discovery has also been attributed to ,schwartz1 a ,german monk1 and the date of #acbj annexed to it2 a date posterior to that which may be justly claimed for ,friar ,bacon2 and as accident is stated to have been the means by which he discovered it1 we have taken that incident as the subject of an illustration4 ,illustration ,mr4 ,hallam1 referring to the authority of an ,arabic author1 infers that there is no question that the knowledge of gunpowder was introduced into ,europe through the means of the ,saracens1 before the middle of the #acth century2 and no doubt its use then was more for fireworks1 than as an artillerist projectile force4 ,there is good evidence1 too1 that the use of gunpowder was introduced into ,spain by the ,moors1 at least as early as the year #acdc4 ,now1 as ,roger ,bacon is known to have been an ,arabic scholar1 it is not at all unlikely that he might have become acquainted with the mode of making the composition1 and also with its most remarkable properties1 by perusing some ,arabian writer with whom we are at present unacquainted4 ,this invention1 by which the personal barbarity of war has certainly been diminished1 is1 when considered as a means of human destruction1 by far the most powerful that skill has ever devised1 or accident presented2 acquiring1 as experience shows us1 a more sanguinary dominion in every succeeding age1 and subserving all the progressive resources of science and civilization for the extermination of mankind3 which1 says ,mr4 ,hallam1 8appals us at the future prospects of the species1 and makes us feel1 perhaps1 more than in any other instance1 a difficulty in reconciling the mysterious dispensation with the benevolent order of ,providence40 ,the composition of gunpowder1 as regards the proportions of the ingredients1 has not undergone any material alteration2 the chemical proportions of the ancients being nearly those of the present day4 ,gunpowder is an explosive propellant compound1 consisting of saltpetre or nitre1 charcoal1 and sulphur4 ,the terms1 explosive and propellant1 are not here used as synonymous--they are not convertible2 for a chemical mixture may possess the explosive power in a much higher degree than the propellant3 fulminating gold1 silver1 and mercury1 are dreadfully explosive2 but they have not the same projectile force1 nor can they be used as a substitute for it4 ,several experiments have been made with compounds of this nature1 but the result is the reverse of what might be expected4 ,nothing can resist the exceeding intensity of the action of fulminating powder2 a shot1 when fired in this way1 is not projected as by gunpowder1 but is split into fragments by the velocity of its explosion1 as we shall hereafter have occasion to show4 ,nitre1 or saltpetre1 is strictly the essence of gunpowder4 ,it is a triple compound of oxygen1 nitrogen1 and potassium4 ,the chemical action of those elements on each other1 and the play of affinities between them at a high temperature1 occasion the immense effect produced by gunpowder on the application of fire or heat4 ,by universal consent1 sulphur is included in the mixture1 but it is not absolutely necessary for the 8propellant power20 for nitre and charcoal only will generate effects similar to the compound with sulphur4 ,gunpowder made without sulphur has1 however1 several bad qualities2 it is not1 on the whole1 so powerful1 nor so regular in its action2 it is also porous and friable1 possessing neither firmness nor solidity4 ,it cannot bear the friction of carriage1 and in transport crumbles into dust4 ,the use of sulphur1 therefore1 appears to be not only to complete the mechanical combination of the other ingredients1 but being a perfectly combustible substance1 it increases the general effect1 augments the propellant power1 and is thought to render the powder less susceptible of injury from atmospheric influence4 8,there is one good reason10 says the ,edinburgh ,encyclopdia1 8for the use of sulphur1 although it does not contribute to the production of any elastic fluid4 ,the carbonic acid which is generated would doubtless combine with the potash1 if it were not for the presence of the sulphur1 and thus so much elastic fluid would be lost4 ,that this is the case we know to be true1 from the fact that carbonate of potash is always formed when nitre is decomposed by charcoal alone1 which ,i shall almost immediately show40 ,this certainly would be the case1 to a certain extent1 with gunpowder without sulphur--some carbonate of potash would be formed4 ,the sulphur1 we have no doubt1 from experiments we have made on this subject1 is1 in part1 engaged during the explosion of gunpowder in expelling the sixth proportion of oxygen from the potash1 so as to combine with the potassium1 to form a true sulphuret of that metal4 ,this fact is easily ascertained1 from the circumstance that no sulphuretted hydrogen can be detected1 by the most delicate tests1 coming from the residuum left after firing gunpowder1 until moisture has gained access to it4 ,the bad smell which arises sometime after the burning of gunpowder1 is occasioned by the decomposition of the moisture which the sulphuret of potassium attracts from the atmosphere2 giving rise1 by this decomposition and liberation1 to the ftid foul gas1 called sulphuretted hydrogen1 and the production of potassa1 or the oxide of potassium4 ,a commission of ,french chemists and artillerists was appointed by the ,government1 in the year #agid1 to experiment upon the best proportions and constituents of gunpowder for the use of the ,french service4 ,the following were the proportions of five different kinds prepared at the ,essonne works3-- ---------------------------------------- -------- ,no4,nitre4,charcoal4,sulphur4 ---- ---------------------------------------- -------- #a #gfjj #adjj #ajjj ,powder of ,be4 #b #gfjj #abjj #abjj ,grenelle4 #c #gfjj #aejj #ijj ,m4 ,morveau4 #d #ggcb #acdd #ibd ,ditto4 #e #ggej #aejj #gej ,m4 ,keffault4 ---------------------------------------- -------- ,the first and third1 after #bjj discharges with the proof mortar1 were declared the strongest1 and the third proportions were adopted at the recommendation of the commissioners4 ,some few years elapsed1 and the first1 owing to its better keeping quality1 was substituted1 as it contained less charcoal1 and a little more sulphur4 ,the ,french ,government having always been extremely impressed with the value of durability in gunpowder1 they have since returned to their ancient proportions3 #ge nitre1 #ab-a_/b charcoal1 #ab-a_/b sulphur4 ,the charcoal1 the absorbent of moisture1 being further reduced1 and the sulphur1 the preserving ingredient1 being increased in the same ratio4 8,mr4 ,napier tried a small quantity made of nitre and charcoal only1 and was much surprised to find it project a shot as far as the best powder made in the usual manner4 ,it is found that1 in small charges1 sulphur is advantageous2 but1 in charges of several ounces1 the projecting force is as great without as with it4 ,therefore1 under certain circumstances1 sulphur may be dispensed with2 but to make a good gunpowder1 nitre and charcoal are indispensable40 ,amongst the brilliant discoveries of modern chemistry may be classed the development of the fact1 that a chemical combination1 to constitute the same compound1 always takes place in definite and unalterable ratios4 ,to select one example out of a multitude3 one atom of carbon combining with two atoms of oxygen produces the gas2 because more would answer no useful end4 ,so1 with reference to the sulphur1 if it enter into combination only with the potassium--the base of the nitre--the sulphur should be in that proportion to form the sulphuret of that metal2 and in this case there would be no superfluity1 for that would only add to the weight of the charge of powder1 and diminish its absolute and effective energy4 ,the view of the case which we have taken supposes only two combinations1 viz4 carbon with oxygen1 and sulphur with potassium4 ,should there be a more diversified play of affinities1 and the several elements of the powder enter into more complicated action1 accurate analysis would conduct us through all difficulties1 and point out what the proportions of the ingredients ought to be in order to sustain that action1 and to produce a perfect ultimate result4 ,we thus perceive how analysis bears upon the case4 ,we can see by such reasoning on the subject1 that1 theoretically1 there can be but one set of proportions calculated to produce the best and strongest gunpowder1 and that those proportions must depend upon the established and unerring laws of nature4 ,the proportions1 then1 for gunpowder1 by these considerations1 will be those in which the carbon will just consume the oxygen of the nitre1 and combine with the sulphur as much as will exactly saturate the potassium4 ,this will be effected by an atom each of nitre and sulphur1 and three atoms of carbon2 or nitre #gee1 charcoal #ahh1 and of sulphur #aah4 ,in the present improved state of chemical science1 when the nature of the bodies comprising gunpowder is so well known1 as well as the compounds resulting from their action on each other1 the proportions we have named may be taken as the best for practice4 ,the charcoal should1 in particular1 not be less than the nitre1 as the smallest portion less than the whole atom would be the same as to leave out the whole atom1 in which case there would be no carbonic oxide formed4 ,if1 for example1 instead of the proportions of nitre #gee1 charcoal #afb1 sulphur #ae1 the carbon were #af1 then there would be #db of carbon left in the residuum1 and no carbonic oxide would be formed1 since bodies cannot unite but in definite proportions4 ,from these considerations we can perceive the reason why a small proportion of carbonic oxide is always formed during the decomposition of nitre by charcoal2 for it will be evident1 that as the nitric acid contains five atoms of oxygen1 four of these must combine with two atoms of carbon to form two atoms of carbonic acid1 while the odd atom of oxygen is compelled to take another atom to form carbonic oxide4 ,but this is not the case in the combustion of gunpowder1 as carbonic acid and nitrogen are the principal gases generated4 ,these proportions differ from any other formula yet prescribed2 and1 though different in a great degree from the proportions laid down by various writers on the subject1 the reasons which are here given1 as has been seen1 are such as carry with them a conviction of their truth3 for there cannot possibly be any benefit arising from a greater quantity of any of these materials than is absolutely necessary to form the composition in question2 and if the smallest quantity be above what is requisite to consume the whole1 that1 however small it may be1 is highly detrimental to the effective energy of the mass4 ,what we may here call clean gunpowder1 such as may be used with confidence for repeated discharges of fire-arms of any description1 is of the greatest importance2 therefore1 it does not appear to us1 that any given proportions are so likely to accomplish that object as those before specified4 ,,table ,,of ,,composition ,,of ,,different ,,gunpowders4 ---------------------------------------- ---------------- ,mills4 ,nitre4,charcoal4,sulphur4 ---------------------------------------- ---------------- ,royal ,waltham ,abbey #gejj #aejj #ajjj ,france1 ,national ,mills #gejj #abej #abej ,french ,sporting #ghjj #abjj #ajjj ,french ,mining #fejj #aejj #bjjj ,u4 ,s4 of ,america #gejj #abej #abej ,prussia #gejj #acej #aaej ,russia #gcgh #acei #abfc ,austria 7,musket7 #gbjj #agjj #afjj ,spain #gfdg #ajgh #abge ,sweden #gfjj #aejj #ijj ,switzerland 7,round ,powder7 #gfjj #adjj #ajjj ,chinese #gejj #addj #iij ,theoretical proportions as above #gejj #acbc #aagg ---------------------------------------- ---------------- ,gunpowder consists of a very intricate mixture of sulphur1 carbon 7charcoal71 and nitrate of potash 7nitre74 ,the proportions in which they exist are one equivalent of nitre1 one of sulphur1 and three of carbon4 ,the great explosive power of gunpowder is due to the sudden development from its solid constituents of a large quantity of gases2 these gases are nitrogen and carbonic acid4 ,at the ordinary temperature of the atmosphere these gases would occupy a space three hundred times greater than the bulk of the gunpowder used2 but owing to the intense heat developed at the moment of explosion1 the gases occupy at least #a1ejj times the bulk of the original gunpowder4 ,the mixture1 consisting of one equivalent of nitre1 one of sulphur1 and three of carbon1 would yield three equivalents of carbonic acid1 one of nitrogen1 and one of sulphuret of potassium4 ,the change may be represented thus1-- ,s ,c ,,kono #c ,,co ,n ,,ks4 ,the only solid residue1 therefore1 is the sulphuret of potassium1 and this is the compound which produces the sulphurous odour on washing out a gun barrel2 water is decomposed1 sulphuretted hydrogen and potash being the result of the decomposition4 ,now supposing the elements of gunpowder to exist in these proportions1 it is essential1 in order to secure their perfect combination1 and thus to produce the largest possible volume of gas1 that the elements should be in the most minute state of subdivision4 ,chemical action is a force exerted at insensible distances only1 and chemical substances having the greatest affinity for each other will not combine1 unless their elements are brought into immediate contact3 thus oxygen and hydrogen may be mixed together in the exact proportions to form water2 but no chemical combination will occur1 simply because the ultimate particles of the two gases are not sufficiently near to each other for their chemical affinities to be brought into play2 if1 however1 these gases are subjected to very strong pressure1 so as to bring their particles into immediate contact1 combination occurs1 and the production of water is the result4 ,in order to insure the perfect combination of the elements of gunpowder the same conditions are necessary2 that is to say1 the ultimate particles of the nitre1 charcoal1 and sulphur1 must be brought into the most direct contact1 or the explosive power of the gunpowder will be comparatively trifling4 ,if1 for instance1 the nitre1 charcoal1 and sulphur be pounded in a mortar1 no explosion but a slow combustion will occur when the mixture is ignited2 so that unless this intimate mixture of the elements is carefully attended to in the manufacture of gunpowder1 it is easy to see that the article produced will be of comparatively little value4 ,it is evident then that if tons of the elements of gunpowder were stored in a warehouse which accidentally caught fire1 no explosion would occur from the formation of gunpowder2 though its ingredients would greatly increase the rapidity of combustion4 ,this remark is elicited by the recollection of a fearful explosion which took place at ,gateshead in #ahed4 ,it may be remembered that a warehouse caught fire from an adjoining mill1 and the explosion was supposed to have been produced by the ignition of the elements of gunpowder stored in the warehouse in a crude state4 ,the upper story of the building contained a large quantity of crude sulphur1 and the basement story about the same quantity of nitre1 whilst chemicals of various kinds were stored in other parts of the building2 but according to the accounts published there was no large quantity of carbon in the warehouse2 nevertheless1 a terrific explosion took place1 and after a lengthened investigation1 the conclusion arrived at was this3 the sulphur melting1 mixed with the nitre1 gunpowder was thus formed1 and igniting1 exploded1 producing the terrible effects4 ,but gunpowder may be made without sulphur1 whereas gunpowder without carbon is an impossibility2 and though the elements of gunpowder had all been present1 no explosion could have occurred1 unless they had become mixed in the intimate manner already described4 ,it is true some of the chemical substances in the warehouse might have produced a fearful explosion3 but a more plausible explanation is to be found in the fact1 that gunpowder was at that time much more valuable abroad than at home2 and it is quite possible that some kegs of gunpowder might have been stored away in this warehouse1 until a convenient opportunity presented itself for their removal4 ,the foregoing remarks will serve to explain how it is that powder varies so much in strength and quickness of fire4 ,if the elements are imperfectly incorporated1 the powder can never be equal to that which is properly made2 and the manufacturer1 having ascertained the best proportions in which to mix the elements1 had better improve his machinery for incorporating them1 rather than his knowledge of the chemistry of gunpowder4 ,these observations will also serve to explain the apparent anomaly1 that the ,french1 and some of our other continental brethren1 are held to produce a much inferior sporting gunpowder to that which is manufactured in old ,england4 ,gunpowder is now made by all the sporting gunpowder manufacturers from ,no4 #a to ,no4 #e grain2 and it appears certain that a further increase in the size of the grain would be advantageous2 for many years of patient and laborious experiment clearly show1 that the old notion of gunpowder being blown out of an ordinary sized gun in an unburnt state1 is one of the 8purest of vulgar errors30 such a thing indeed cannot possibly happen unless the powder be bad1 or the gun imperfectly made1 or injudiciously charged4 ,i am satisfied that ,i am under rather than over estimate1 when ,i assert that six drams of ordinary sporting gunpowder may be beneficially and completely exploded in a barrel of #ad bore1 #b feet #f inches long1 with a resisting projectile one ounce in weight above it4 ,this1 however1 being more than a double charge for such a gun1 cannot be pleasantly practised2 and it is only asserted by way of argument4 ,assuming1 then1 for argument's sake1 that six drams of gunpowder are exactly consumed in passing from the breech to the muzzle of a gun #b feet #f inches long1 and that the shot1 therefore1 acquires its greatest velocity as it leaves the muzzle1 it follows that the ordinary charge of #b-a_/b drams will be wholly consumed before it has traversed half the length of the barrel1 and consequently the charge of shot must here acquire its greatest velocity4 ,it is certain1 then1 that the shot must travel the latter half of the barrel at a diminished velocity1 and its velocity must continue to diminish as it passes up the barrel2 for two obvious reasons--#ast1 ,the column of air in front of the charge is more condensed1 and thus offers a greater resistance to the exit of the charge2 #bnd1 ,the velocity is continually diminished by the increased friction of the charge against the barrel4 ,the perfection of projectile science is to make the projectile acquire its greatest velocity at the instant of leaving the muzzle2 and if1 by increasing the size of the grain of gunpowder1 we can diminish the rapidity of its explosion--thus causing it to burn and generate fresh gas up to the muzzle of the gun--the projectile will then acquire its greatest velocity1 and leave the gun to the best advantage3 this is the important point which has hitherto been overlooked1 not only in fowling-pieces1 but in the expansive principle of rifles4 ,for artillery practice of every kind1 whatever the weight of the projectile1 gunpowder of a granulation suited to the weight of that projectile is essential1 if we would produce the greatest possible effect by the least expenditure of means4 ,in artillery1 at this most important time in war's history1 no attention whatever is paid to this essential principle4 ,a long #aj-;inch gun1 a #fh-pounder1 and a short #f-pounder are all charged with powder of the same granulation2 whilst by a more judicious use of gunpowder of suitable granulation1 the range might be extended1 just as it is in sporting arms1 to nearly #bj per cent4 ,artillerists seek to effect great range by doubling the weight of the gun1 and projectile monsters meet us at all points1 to become in every case 8monster failures40 ,i fear that the most important points have been entirely lost sight of4 ,instead of ascertaining whether we have suited the projectile power to the #h-;inch or #ef-pounder1 so as to get work from it which is now done by the #aj-;inch1 we have1 in our anxiety to get range1 looked only to the form or material of the gun2 vital principles being totally excluded4 ,the construction of the gun being perfect1 the question is1 can the expellant force be brought to an equal state of perfection8 ,in order to obtain the best results from a gun1 the gun itself must be perfect in construction1 and the expellant force must be brought to bear in the best possible manner upon the projectile2 and this is to be done by attending to the granulation of the powder1 which must be suited to the length of the gun1 to its bore1 and to the weight of the projectile4 ,common-sense1 engineering skill1 will demonstrate1 that according to the weight of matter to be projected must be the nature of the expellant2 accumulative--until it has overcome the inertia of that matter1 accelerative--until it has communicated to it the highest state of velocity its power is capable of effecting4 ,if1 on the other hand1 it is inferior to this1 science has not extracted from it the full horse-power it contains2 and we are uselessly expending force and destroying our engines by undue pressure being exerted on one part1 and inferior pressure on another2 whilst by a proper distribution of that force1 durability of the cannon is insured1 and from twenty-five to thirty per cent4 more work may be obtained from an equal quantity of powder1 provided its granulation be judiciously selected according to the area of the gun4 ,there is abundant proof that on this engineering question we have hitherto worked by the 8rule of thumb20 prejudice having been a stumbling-block1 which nothing but stern necessity will remove4 ,the authorities have but just discovered this1 although their attention was directed to it several years ago4 ,in the year #aheb1 ,i produced before the ,small ,arms ,committee1 at ,enfield1 a portion of gunpowder suited to the expansive rifle2 it was tried to a limited extent1 and dismissed with the remark1 8,we don't think there is much in it40 ,experience1 however1 has demonstrated the truth of my observations1 for1 in all extreme range shooting with the expansive or 8,greenerian0-principled rifles1 not only is considerably greater accuracy obtained with it1 but an increase of range equivalent to fifteen or twenty per cent4 ,another advantage of using gunpowder of a suitable granulation is the absence of sharp recoil2 and thus greater accuracy of range is obtained--accuracy of range and steadiness of weapon being inseparable4 ,large-grain gunpowder is not only a more effectual expellant than the fine grain1 but is much more safe to use1 for by using it the risk of bursting the barrel is much lessened2 as a very simple illustration will show4 ,if we estimate the force generated by the usual charge of #b-a_/b drachms 7,i confine the question to the #ad-;bore gun1 for uniformity7 to be #e1jjj lbs41 whether the powder be fine or coarse grain1 it follows that the fine powder1 igniting so rapidly1 will exert all its force on the breech end of the gun2 whereas the coarse powder1 igniting less rapidly1 distributes this force over the whole length of the barrel3 hence the greater risk of a gun bursting with fine powder than with coarse4 ,if we suppose the fine powder to be entirely ignited when it reaches half way up the barrel1 then the force of #e1jjj lbs4 is exerted on the lower half of the barrel2 but if the coarser grain is not entirely ignited until it reaches the muzzle1 then the force of #e1jjj lbs4 will be distributed over the whole length of the gun4 ,but this is not all4 ,the fine powder1 igniting almost instantaneously1 exerts its force in all directions at once1 and the barrel may burst at the side before the charge has time to move2 whereas the coarse powder1 igniting as it does more slowly1 first lifts the charge1 and then the volume of gas behind it increasing as the powder becomes more thoroughly ignited1 sweeps the charge out of the barrel with a velocity increasing towards the muzzle4 ,if time is not given for the charge to receive the full advantage of the expansive force of the generated air1 the force is exerted1 not upon the charge1 but upon the barrel of the gun itself2 and that time is necessary for the full development of this force1 is proved by the fact that miners mix their gunpowder with sawdust1 in order to diminish the rapidity of its explosion and thus get the advantage of its force in the distance3 from the miners1 then1 let us learn how to obtain the greatest benefit from this force1 and waste it not4 ,there can be no doubt of the importance of this principle2 little progress has1 however1 been effected from want of scientific illustration2 let it be defined like that of steam power1 and its adoption will follow as a natural consequence4 ,for several years ,i have had gunpowder manufactured of various sizes1 at the sight of which most sportsmen would express their astonishment4 ,one objection held by sportsmen to the large grained gunpowder is that it does not come up the nipple of the gun2 now although ,i do not consider this at all important1 still if the specific gravity of the gunpowder were increased by compressing #a-a_/b1 #b1 or #c grains of gunpowder into the space of #a grain1 by means of hydraulic pressure1 this objection would at once be obviated2 whilst at the same time1 the powder would be less liable to absorb moisture1 or to become friable with age3 either of which conditions is incompatible with good shooting4 ,the granulating of gunpowder1 to be of the greatest benefit1 should be on a uniform principle2 the manipulation should be alike in all particulars1 but especially in that part of the process which determines the specific gravity4 ,the hydraulic pressure on the cake should be alike in all cases3 in fact1 the various sizes of grain might be produced from the same cake1 and the desired object be thus obtained4 ,but so long as the practice is followed of producing large grain from less condensed cake1 the article produced will give unsatisfactory results2 and the advantages which might be attained1 as my experience denotes1 and which would be of the greatest service1 alike in sporting1 rifle1 and artillery powder1 will be nullified4 ,great improvements are yet to be made1 especially in the powder used for artillery2 whilst range1 accuracy1 and lessened recoils are points which may be determined with almost mathematical precision4 ,great fame is in prospect for any one who can grasp and handle well this granulation principle2 especially if he can define the sizes to be used for different varieties of guns4 ,artillerists who contend that a medium size grain1 to suit all sizes of gun1 is advantageous1 might as well contend that cannon of a medium size would be preferable to so many different sizes1 because1 though we lose in range1 accuracy1 and recoil1 it would be more convenient to have but one sized gun4 ,in making large grained gunpowder1 the manufacturers defeat one of the main objects to be gained by granulation1 from not subjecting it to the same amount of pressure which is necessary for the granulation of the very fine grain4 ,in granulating very fine powder1 it is necessary to subject the cake to such an amount of hydraulic pressure as shall give the mass a marble-like structure1 or during the process of granulation1 the whole of it crumbles into dust2 but the coarser gunpowder may be granulated without subjecting it to this high degree of pressure1 hence each grain is more porous and of lesser specific gravity3 a difference which it is most important to avoid4 ,it is clear1 therefore1 that according to the present mode of manufacturing gunpowder1 the large and the fine grain are of very different kinds2 the main difference being in their specific gravities4 ,gunpowder of less density burns with greater rapidity1 because it is more open and porous2 and if uniform density was observed1 the diversity in the size of the grain need not be so great2 whilst1 at the same time1 this anomaly might be avoided--that the same measure of fine and large-grained gunpowder contains a difference of the expansive element amounting to fifteen or twenty per cent4 ,as gunpowder is now manufactured1 it is highly necessary in all comparative trials to weigh1 and not to measure the charge1 or the results will be deceptive and worthless4 ,the granulation question struggles with undeserved difficulty4 ,gunmakers1 either not understanding the question1 or constructing the chambers of their guns improperly1 and not using suitable nipples1 decry the adoption of large-grained gunpowder2 but they forget the increased range obtained in the killing from their guns1 and the clt a long shot produces4 ,in trials of guns at thirty or forty yards1 the difference in the shooting with fine and large-grained gunpowder is not so apparent1 and the maker exclaims1 8,oh6 the fine powder shoots stronger1 and as close as the coarse40 ,i admit this to be the case1 at short distances2 but the great advantage of using the large grain is sufficiently evident when shooting at forty-five1 fifty1 and sixty yards1 for then the fine grain entirely fails3 simply from the oft-repeated fact1 that the fine powder is more of a propulsive1 while the large grain is an expellant force2 so that according to the law of resistance in ariform fluids1 the one is sooner reduced to medium velocity than the other1 which exerts its action more evenly4 ,powder of larger grain is thus more suitable for the larger sizes of shot1 and would give an increased range in usual shooting1 for the shot is kept better together1 and is projected to greater distances4 ,a common way of testing the quality of gunpowder is1 to rub it between the hands1 and observe the darkness of the stain2 the darker the stain the more inferior the gunpowder is held to be4 ,this test is1 however1 decidedly fallacious1 because the gunpowder may be of low specific gravity1 or it may have become friable from age and other causes4 ,whales are shot with gunpowder proportioned to the weight of the harpoon required to kill them4 ,duck guns of the largest calibre are comparatively useless unless the gunpowder used is granulated according to the weight of the projectile2 and the same law holds in regard to the most 8mammoth0 engine yet to be devised by the mind of man4 ,gun-cotton has been before the world for some years1 but1 except as a curiosity1 it has attracted little public attention2 neither has it gained any reputation as a projectile force4 ,it may be prepared by steeping cotton wool for a few minutes in a mixture of nitric and sulphuric acids1 thoroughly washing1 and then drying at a very gentle heat4 ,it consists chemically of the essential elements of gunpowder3 viz4 carbon1 nitrogen1 and oxygen2 but1 in addition1 it contains another highly elastic gas1 hydrogen4 ,the carbon in the fibres of the wool presents to the action of flame a most extended surface in a small space1 and the result is an explosion approaching as nearly as possible to the instantaneous3 in consequence of its rapid ignition it produces a violent kick2 sufficient time is not given to put heavy bodies in motion1 hence it cannot be usefully employed as a projectile agent4 ,no one who values his limbs should trifle with it1 for fearful accidents have resulted from its exposure to the heat of the sun1 and other very simple causes4 ,there is an instrument used by some sportsmen1 and strongly recommended by many gunmakers1 for testing the strength of different kinds of gunpowder4 ,it consists of a chamber closed by a spring1 and fired like an ordinary pistol4 ,when the powder explodes the spring is forced forward1 and moves an index round a graduated circle2 the more quickly the powder explodes the farther does it lift the spring2 hence this is a measure of quickness of fire1 but not of expellant force2 and from the observations which have been made on gunpowder1 it must be evident to any one who has paid the least attention to the subject1 that this instrument is utterly useless4 ,an instrument to test the comparative strength of different kinds of gunpowder is yet a desideratum in projectile science2 and we cannot doubt that such an instrument will be produced1 when the importance of the granulation of gunpowder is more generally known and appreciated4 ,the charcoal formerly used was made in the common way1 by pits1 which must have been seen by almost every one4 ,the method is now to distil the wood in cast-iron cylinders1 extracting the pyroligneous acid1 c41 by heating them red hot1 and allowing all other volatile matter to evaporate1 the charcoal only being retained in the cylinder or retorts2 hence arises the name cylinder gunpowder4 ,the best charcoal for sporting powders is the black dog wood2 ,government use willow and alder4 ,any charcoal does for common powders4 ,charcoal is ground in the same way as the nitre4 ,sulphur is purified simply by fusing1 and when in that state1 skimming off the impurities3 it is cooled and pulverised in the same way as the other two ingredients4 ,the three ingredients1 after being carefully weighed in their due proportions1 are sifted into a large trough1 and well mixed together by the hands4 ,they are then conveyed to the powder mill4 ,this is a large circular trough1 having a smooth iron bed1 in which two millstones1 secured to a horizontal axis1 revolve1 traversing each other1 and making nine or ten revolutions in a minute4 ,the powder is mixed with a small quantity of water put on the bed of the mill1 and there kept subject to the pressure of the stones2 and if we calculate the weight of the two millstones at six tons1 it follows that in four or five hours' incorporation on this bed1 it subjects the ingredients to the action of full #aj1jjj tons4 ,it is this long-continued grinding1 compounding1 and blending together of the mixture1 that alone renders it useful and good4 ,after this intimate mixing1 it is conveyed away in the shape of mill-cake1 and firmly pressed between plates of copper4 ,bramah's press has been introduced of late years--we should say with a good deal of improvement to the powder1 as will be shown hereafter--and by its means the mass is more compressed and in thinner cakes4 ,it is then broken into small pieces with wooden mallets1 and taken to the corning-house1 where it is granulated1 8by putting it into sieves1 the bottoms of which are made of bullocks' hides1 prepared like parchment1 and perforated with holes about two-tenths of an inch in diameter2 from twenty to thirty of these sieves are secured to a large frame1 moving on an eccentric axis1 or crank1 of six inches throw2 two pieces of lignum vit1 six inches in diameter1 and two inches or more in thickness1 are placed on the broken press-cakes in each sieve4 ,the machinery being then put in rapid motion1 the discs of lignum vit 7called balls7 pressing upon the powder1 and striking against the sides of the sieves1 force it through the apertures1 in grains of various sizes1 on to the floor1 from whence it is removed1 and again sifted through finer sieves of wire1 to separate the dust and classify the grain4 ,one man works two sieves at a time1 by turning a handle and eccentric crank2 the sieves being fixed to a frame1 which is suspended over a bin by four ropes from the ceiling40 ,the grains afterwards undergo a process of glazing1 by friction against each other1 in barrels containing nearly #bjj lbs41 making forty revolutions in a minute1 and lasting several hours1 according to the fancy of the purchaser4 ,this part of the business we entirely disagree with1 as injurious to the quick and certain ignition4 ,gunpowder is finally dried by an artificial temperature of #adj ,fahrenheit1 which is suffered gradually to decline4 ,the last process is sifting it clear of dust1 and then packing it in canisters or otherwise4 ,the utility of the process of granulation results from the impossibility of firing mealed powder sufficiently simultaneously to effect an explosion2 and also from the fact that gunpowder1 in a mass1 does not explode4 ,fire a solid piece of mill-cake1 and it does not flash off like unto granulated powder1 but burns gradually1 though with an extreme fury1 until the whole is consumed4 ,this arises from its density1 the compression in the press2 it also teaches us one fact1 that to be of the greatest service1 the time each grain should occupy in burning should be proportioned to the size of the gun for which it is required2 since it is clear that the explosion of a heap of gunpowder is but the rapid combustion of all its parts4 ,this action1 as is well known1 is so rapid1 even in a large quantity of powder1 that it appears to be a sudden and simultaneous burst of flame2 though philosophically and actually it is not so4 ,fine grain1 when unconfined1 explodes quicker than large1 or is sooner burnt out1 and consequently generates more force in the same period of time2 but when it comes to large quantities1 its very quickness is detrimental to its force1 by condensing the air around the exterior of the mass of fluid which thus constrains its bound4 ,in small quantities1 the proportion of condensation is not so apparent1 and hence the reason why greater velocities can be obtained with small arms than with cannon4 ,there exists a diversity of opinion in regard to the strength or projectile force of gunpowder4 ,dr4 ,ure remarks--8,if we inquire how the maximum gaseous volume is to be produced from the chemical reaction of the elements of nitre on charcoal and sulphur1 we shall find it to be by the generation of carbonic oxide and sulphurous acid1 with the disengagement of nitrogen4 ,this will lead us to the following proportions of these constituents3 ,hydrogen #a4 ,per ,cent4 #a prime equivalent of nitre #ajb #gejj #a sulphur #af #aagg #c charcoal #ah #acbc --- ------ #acf #ajjjj 8,the nitre contains five primes of oxygen1 of which three combining with the three of charcoal1 will furnish three of carbonic oxide gas1 while the remaining two will convert the one prime of sulphur into sulphurous acid gas4 ,the single prime of nitrogen is therefore1 in this view1 disengaged alone4 8,the gaseous volume1 in this supposition1 evolved from #acf grains of gunpowder1 equivalent in bulk to #ge-a_/b grains of water1 or to three-tenths of a cubic inch1 will be1 at the atmospheric temperature1 as follows3-- ,grains4 ,cubic ,inches4 ,carbonic oxide #db #adaf ,sulphurous acid #cb #dgb ,nitrogen #ad #dgd ----- #bcfb being an expansion of one volume into #ghgc4 ,but as the temperature of the gases1 at the instant of their combustive formation1 must be incandescent1 this volume may be safely estimated at three times the above amount1 or considerably upwards of #b1jjj times the bulk of the explosive solid4 8,it is obvious that the more sulphur1 the more sulphurous acid will be generated1 and the less forcibly explosive will be the gunpowder4 ,this was confirmed by the experiments at ,essonne1 where the gunpowder that contained twelve of sulphur1 twelve of charcoal1 in #ajj parts1 did not throw the proof shell so far as that which contained only nine of sulphur and fifteen of charcoal4 ,the conservative property is1 however1 of so much importance for humid climates and our remote colonies1 that it justifies a slight sacrifice of strength4 8,when in a state of explosion1 the volume10 ,dr4 ,hutton calculates1 8is at least increased eight times1 and hence its immense power4 ,the pressure exerted1 if in a state of confinement1 will depend on the dimensions of the vessel containing it2 so that it would be no difficult undertaking to obtain any pressure above that of the atmosphere1 up1 we may fearlessly say1 to the enormous amount of #d1jjj lbs4 per square inch40 ,the same quantity of gunpowder subjected to a variety of experimental tests1 differs materially in its results2 at the same time it is only by such a method that we can arrive at the relative strength or power which it possesses4 ,dr4 ,hutton1 whose authority in all mathematical calculations is very high1 and whose opinions and judgment in matters of this nature ought not to be unthinkingly controverted1 states #b1jjj feet per second 7with cannon7 as the highest velocity which any projectile had attained1 at the time of his writing1 which had gunpowder for its propellant power4 ,a much greater velocity is now given in all guns fired at high elevations4 8,monks'0 gun attained a velocity of #b1djj feet in the first second of its flight1 and this is now exceeded by rifled cannon4 ,this advantage does not arise1 in our opinion1 so much from the superior quality of the gunpowder1 as from the improvements which have taken place in the manner of applying it4 ,for instance1 where experiments are conducted1 as was the case with ,dr4 ,hutton1 with moving eprouvettes1 a certain loss is sustained1 in the same degree as the instrument is made to recoil from its original position2 therefore1 by restraining the recoil1 an increase of momentum is given to the projectile1 to the same extent as had been exerted upon the eprouvette1 or cannon1 in driving it several feet backward2 and instead of dividing the force thus acquired between the shot and the gun1 by having the latter firmly fixed and the recoil destroyed1 the whole power is exerted upon the former1 and its velocity accelerated in the same proportion4 ,gunpowder1 though astonishing in its effect1 and tremendous in power1 may nevertheless be controlled within a limited sphere1 and bounds put upon its destructive energy4 ,the following curious experiment1 first tried at ,woolwich on a small scale1 has since been carried out to a great extent4 ,screw into each end of the breech part of a gun-barrel a well-fitted plug2 drill a communication1 and put in a nipple2 having filled the barrel with powder1 screw in the breech1 and fire a cap on it1 and the explosive fluid will escape by the small orifice like steam from a pipe4 ,if the barrel be good1 it may safely be held in the hand1 merely using a towel to protect the hand from the heat the barrel absorbs4 ,we have done it repeatedly with no inconvenience1 and even carried this experiment much further2 firing two ounces of the best powder in a barrel of good quality 7though not in the hand7 yet the barrel did not receive any violent motion by which it could be inferred that it might not be done with safety4 ,we have before observed1 that1 with very short guns1 fine gunpowder produces the greatest result1 inasmuch as there is no greater column of air in the barrel than the explosive fluid is equal to displace2 or1 in other words1 the charge leaving the muzzle of the gun at the very moment when the explosive force is strongest1 all the power is thus obtained of which it is capable2 but if used in a longer barrel1 and the fluid has obtained its greatest power when the charge has twelve inches of the barrel still to travel1 the column of compressed air yet remaining in the muzzle of the barrel1 exerts a resisting influence1 in proportion to its density1 upon the charge1 and creates a dangerous and unpleasant recoil4 ,if a cartridge be placed in the centre of an open barrel eight feet in length1 having a bullet abutting at each end large enough to fill the barrel1 and a touch-hole is drilled as near the centre of the cartridge as possible1 when it is fired1 the balls will certainly be discharged from the barrel1 but with a very small degree of force3 in fact1 merely driven out4 ,with the same instrument1 vary the experiment3 place in it a cartridge charged with one ball1 three feet from the muzzle1 leaving a column of air five feet in length to act against the explosive force of the gunpowder1 and the ball will be driven one hundred yards with considerable force4 ,again1 let a third cartridge be introduced similar to the last1 two feet from the muzzle1 increasing the column of air to six feet2 and the result1 in distance and velocity1 will nearly double what has been obtained by the last experiment2 tending to prove that air thus forced back upon itself obtains a density1 and consequent resisting influence1 nearly equal to a well-screwed breech4 ,in order to test this principle further1 ,i put into the same tube a double charge of gunpowder1 merely backed by a wadding1 two feet from the muzzle1 and then rammed down four balls as tight as possible into the short portion2 in discharging it1 the tube was burst immediately in rear of the charge4 ,in another experiment1 ,i took a common musket barrel1 having a plug of iron firmly fixed into the muzzle2 the breech being unscrewed1 and a ball introduced one-tenth of an inch less in diameter than the bore of the barrel1 together with one drachm of gunpowder1 ,i then fired the gunpowder1 and the explosive matter escaped by the touch-hole4 ,on examination1 it was found that the ball was flattened to the extent of one-third of its sphere4 ,the charge for the next experiment was increased to two drachms2 when the ball in the discharge struck the muzzle very slightly1 altering its shape in the least conceivable degree4 ,the charge was next increased to three drachms1 and the ball was extracted without any perceptible defect4 ,in the fourth trial1 another drachm was added1 with which the effect was greater than the tube was able to resist2 it was in consequence burst1 about three inches from the muzzle4 ,from this ,i infer that1 in the first trial1 the velocity of the ball was not so great1 but that the air escaped past it1 by what is technically called the windage1 allowing it to strike the plug at the end of the barrel with sufficient force to alter the shape of the lead in the manner described4 ,the second trial gave an increased velocity2 the opposing forces being so nearly balanced that the ball scarcely reached the end of the barrel1 and was very little injured4 ,in the third trial the velocity became so great1 and the air was condensed to such an extent1 that the ball struck upon a cushion-like surface so highly elastic that it was extracted without the least injury to its shape4 ,the last charge was too powerful1 inasmuch as the lateral pressure of compressed air rent the tube asunder4 ,the one great cause of this and other barrels bursting1 arises from the velocity becoming too great1 and thus driving back the air upon itself1 until the mutual repulsion of the particles forms an almost impenetrable barrier1 exerting a lateral pressure on the barrel1 and resisting the passage of the elastic fluid4 ,to make the explanation plain2 supposing that the charge had condensed the air for the distance of three or four inches immediately preceding it1 and then come to rest1 the waves of vibration1 travelling at the rate of #a1cjj feet per second1 would communicate to the remainder of the column the same pressure1 and an equilibrium would take place4 ,but this not being the case1 and the air becoming still more highly compressed by the velocity not decreasing but increasing1 the lateral pressure becomes greater than the fibres of the iron are able to withstand1 and consequently the barrel is burst4 ,many accidents arise from this cause solely1 and without any blame being attached to either the maker or user of the gun4 ,while on this subject1 we may remark that this is the more likely1 inasmuch as the powder with which barrels are proved is not the strongest1 and is also of a large grain2 so that it is quite within the range of probability that a barrel may1 and it does often1 stand proof1 and yet burst when it comes to be used with extremely fine-grained strong powder2 as it is quite clear that a high velocity must create danger4 ,to pursue the subject still further3 in order to procure conclusive evidence in support of this argument1 ,i had a tube of iron manufactured1 sufficiently good in quality to bear an enormous pressure2 it was three feet in length1 with a bore large enough to admit an ounce ball1 and the sides of the arch were full a quarter of an inch in thickness4 ,a piece of steel1 one inch in length1 was then turned of a size to fit the bore well1 but not so tight as to prevent its free action3 this ,i called a piston4 ,from the centre of the tube to the muzzle1 were drilled1 on all sides1 a number of small holes1 a quarter of an inch distant from each other1 in all amounting to sixty-eight2 these were fitted with small pieces of steel needles1 hardened1 projecting into the interior of the tube a quarter of an inch1 so that the piston1 in its upward movement1 should strike these pins1 and thus enable me to judge how far it was driven by each experiment4 ,each end of the tube was then fitted with a breech1 firmly screwed in2 the upper one having a flat internal surface1 the lower one1 where ignition was to be communicated1 being a conical or patent breech4 ,this machine ,i termed an explosion metre2 and it answered its purpose4 ,with two drachms of the best canister gunpowder1 the piston was propelled nineteen inches along the tube2 breaking eight pins4 ,the same quantity of the fine diamond grain reached only eighteen inches1 or four pins4 ,no4 #c grain1 of both ,laurence's and ,pigou and ,wilks' manufacture1 reached twenty-four inches1 or twenty-eight pins4 ,a very superior powder1 containing in one grain five of diamond1 four of canister1 and two of the above makers' ,no4 #b1 reached twenty-seven inches1 and broke forty pins4 ,in each of these experiments the greatest accuracy was observed1 in preparing the metre as well as in weighing the charge4 ,these facts go far to prove that1 in all uses of gunpowder1 the grain should be of a size proportioned to the length and bore of the gun2 for if we have not an accelerating force to overcome the increasing resistance of the compressed column of air in the barrel1 there is great danger that the gun may be burst1 and probably be productive of great mischief2 whilst a judicious application of the extraordinary power thus placed at our disposal1 may be alike conducive to our safety and our pleasure4 ,a musket ball can be driven through an half-inch boiler plate2 but this can only be accomplished by using as much powder as will generate a gradually1 though rapidly1 increasing power1 until the ball has passed the limits of the tube4 ,nitre is not the only salt which has been employed in the manufacture of gunpowder4 ,its quantity or proportion in the mixture has been lessened1 and the deficiency supplied by another elementary combination2 namely1 by the chlorate of potassa4 ,the ,french succeeded in making powder of which potassa forms one of the component parts1 and they say it ranges the projectile double the distance2 but this is doubtful4 ,the proportions of the mixture are nitrate of potash twenty-five parts1 chlorate of potassa forty-five1 sulphur fifteen1 charcoal seven and a half1 and lycopodium seven and a half parts4 ,in the year #ahji1 a similar kind of powder was proposed to the ,english ,government1 by a person of the name of ,parr2 but its introduction was very properly opposed by ,sir ,william ,congreve1 on account of the danger attending its use1 and also from the fact that there was no piece of ordnance in the service able to withstand its effects4 ,the proportions were1 chlorate of potassa six parts1 fine charcoal one part1 sulphur one part4 ,these ingredients to be carefully mixed together and granulated4 ,the above mixture was laid aside1 not only from the want of power to restrain its effects1 but because it was useless1 from the very extreme rapidity of its explosion3 it forms the atmospheric air into a wall of adamant1 by the condensation confining it to a comparatively small space2 it becomes lightning--an electric fluid1 which1 from its very intensity1 cannot displace any great mass of air4 ,neither can any advantage arise from any greater velocity in projectile force1 except we can obtain that by a graduated scale2 for masses cannot1 from a state of rest1 be put in extreme motion instantaneously3 philosophy teaches us1 and experience makes it evident1 that a portion of time must be occupied1 however short that may be4 ,all motion is gradual1 and cannot be obtained otherwise2 and hence the fact1 that lightning conveyed into a tube filled with projectiles would not drive them out3 it would not project them1 but the blow would break them in pieces4 ,so is it with this mixture2 it is useless from its very rapidity of ignition4 ,we have shown that even fine grain gunpowder is too quick1 and that its quickness destroys its power2 how much more so is the other3 and what would it avail us1 with these disadvantages4 ,a writer mentions what he conceives to be a curious fact3 he says1 8,if a train of gunpowder be crossed at right angles by a train of fulminating mercury1 laid on a sheet of paper on a table1 and the gunpowder lighted by a red hot wire1 the flame will run on until it meets the cross train of fulminating mercury1 when the inflammation of the latter will be so instantaneous as to cut off the connection with the continuous train of gunpowder1 leaving one half of the train unignited30 and again1 8,if the fulminating powder be lighted first1 it will go straight on1 and pass through the train of gunpowder so rapidly as not to inflame it at all40 ,true2 and the cause is quite apparent3 the rapidity of combustion condenses the air so quickly1 as to remove the grains of gunpowder liable to come in contact with the flame1 and to form the condensed air into a line of demarcation3 for heat cannot be taken up by the air quicker than the atmosphere will convey sound2 and before the heat can evaporate the explosion is over1 and is consequently noiseless4 ,in all mining operations3 in the quarrying of stone1 the destruction of sunken rocks1 or in any other operations where it is desirable to detach large masses1 the use of gunpowder is indispensable2 not only because it decreases manual exertion but also because it can be used under circumstances and in situations unapproachable by other means4 ,it becomes1 therefore1 a consideration for the miner what kind is best suited for the purpose2 the finest grained powder is useless as is well known3 it is also more expensive2 but its principal defect arises from its quickness of combustion4 ,masses cannot be detached without first putting the whole in motion2 and as this cannot be done in a very short time1 it is necessary to prolong the explosion1 so that the wave of vibration may have time to travel throughout the whole of the mass acted upon2 and a repetition of these waves is necessary before any mass can move4 ,now1 to obtain this1 it is necessary that matter be so incorporated with the powder as to prolong that explosion2 bituminous substances might be applied with effect1 for their slow burning would keep the heat necessary to hold the permanent gases at their utmost stretch of expansion4 ,it is obvious1 from the extremely high character ,english sporting gunpowder has obtained all over the world1 that considerable improvement must have been effected by the private manufacturers1 either in the purification or manipulation of ingredients2 indeed the unwearied care bestowed on this point by several of our best makers is beyond all praise4 ,to explain the various methods1 or otherwise enlarge upon this point1 would be injurious to individual skill and enterprise1 and be the means of imparting knowledge to those who have not ability to invent1 but who gather from the brains of others4 ,the ,french set great value on the 8,poudre de ,chasse0 of ,england4 ,it is rather singular that we should excel those who pride themselves so much on their chemical knowledge2 but1 as before remarked1 it is certain that the intimate incorporation of the ingredients is of more importance than the chemical proportions4 ,all military and naval gunpowder is not manufactured of the greatest strength that can be acquired 8at the ,government mills20 a sample is furnished to each contractor with each contract1 and to this strength he is limited4 ,the fame of our ,english gunpowder makers is patent to all the world1 and1 where skill is equal1 to name one rather than another would be invidious2 though we must not lose sight of the facts herein established4 8,granulation10 properly understood1 is an equivalent point to either chemical or mechanical knowledge and manipulation in gunpowder manufacture4 ,great anxiety to meet the wishes of the sporting world on this point1 and to advance with the age1 has been aroused2 and specimens have been kindly furnished to me1 not by one1 but by all the following celebrated makers3 ,messrs4 ,pigou and ,wilks1 ,curtis and ,harvey1 ,lawrence and ,son1 ,john ,hall and ,son2 and ,i have received also a very excellent specimen from the ,scotch mills4 ,gunpowder of five sizes of granulation1 on the basis before alluded to3 namely1 ,no4 #b1 containing two quantities of ,no4 #a1 and ,no4 #c1 three1 and so on in progression2 but it is imperative that all the various sizes be produced from the same mill cake1 or be otherwise of the same condensation or specific gravity1 and in all experiments of comparison1 equal weights are a 8sine qu non10 otherwise the comparison will be futile2 as measure is1 for these very obvious reasons1 inapplicable in comparative tests4 ,when these points are carefully attained1 increased power of killing1 8decreased recoil10 and much greater safety1 will be the important benefits which the gunpowder manufacturers will confer on every one using a gun4 ,,chapter ,,iii4 ,,artillery4 ,arcualia1 from 8arcus1 a bow10 appears to have been the original name1 and included all sorts of 8missiles10 as well as the engines by which they were propelled4 ,the sling1 still in common use by the ,arabs on the banks of the upper ,euphrates1 being most probably the first kind of artillery1 and the bow and arrow a succeeding stage of improvement4 ,artillery1 now in the general acceptance of the term1 includes all and every description of gun1 of greater power and dimensions than muskets and other shoulder guns4 ,modern civilization1 with its giant strides of improvement1 has rejected the cumbrous and unsightly complication of springs1 levers and wheels2 and given to us1 in their stead1 the light and handsome six-pounder cannon2 which is so easy of transit that it can accomplish the most complex and difficult movements1 while the horses are at their fullest gallop4 ,a single minute now suffices to stop when at the greatest speed1 unlimber1 load1 fire a couple of rounds1 and remount2 the gun is speedily at a distance--while the eye can scarcely follow1 or the mind imagine1 the destruction that must follow when the 8deep-tongued gun0 is fired in attack4 ,i shall now proceed to notice the comparative effects of guns of various calibre and power1 and attempt to convey to the reader a distinct idea of their respective defects and advantages4 ,the artillery of ,england comprises an immense variety of weapons of war1 suited for various purposes and situations1 as experience has dictated1 or necessity required4 ,the present state of our artillery requires an advance to the front1 to be in a line with the march of science1 as regards the knowledge of gunpowder and projectiles2 ,i may1 therefore1 be permitted to animadvert on what appears to me to need improvement4 ,the profession may think it presumptuous in me to offer a suggestion or give an opinion2 for it too frequently happens that individuals1 who have employed their whole time and study on one especial subject1 think they alone can understand it1 and consider any opposition to their opinions1 or any doubt of the soundness of their conclusions1 little short of a positive offence4 ,having given considerable attention to the subject1 ,i would now beg to offer some remarks on the ,government arrangements of gunnery1 which are not yet so perfect as they might be4 ,the authorities of the ,ordnance ,department are1 ,i am sorry to state1 too remiss in considering1 and too unwilling to avail themselves of valuable improvements and discoveries2 clinging too much to prejudice in favour of whatever has been heretofore in use4 ,to such an extent is this habit carried1 that many improvements become familiar to half the kingdom1 aye1 and are adopted by other countries1 before our guides take advantage of them3 for truly talent and ingenuity are but scantily patronized by them4 ,my wish is to aid in sweeping away the cobwebs which still hang on the science of great gunnery2 and to push the spur of conviction deep1 that instead of ,britain following1 she may1 in a time of peace1 lead the way in improvements2 so that whenever war returns1 she may not be unprepared to wage it on equal terms4 ,i have in this chapter endeavoured to divest the subject of all extraneous matter1 and impart as much information as will enable the reader to form an opinion for himself1 and understand something of a science hitherto considered abstract1 and which is1 no doubt1 abstruse4 ,this ,i have sought to effect in plain language1 avoiding1 wherever it was possible1 all technicalities4 ,the guns of the ,british nation may be divided into four classes--,park1 or ,field artillery1 ,siege guns1 or battering train1 garrison guns1 and marine artillery4 ,the numbers of different descriptions of rates1 or weight of guns1 vary in all the different classes of the service4 ,there are light1 medium1 and heavy six-pounders2 long and short twenty-four pounders2 and two or more weights in all the varieties1 even up to the ten-inch gun and thirteen-inch mortar4 ,we have iron ordnance and brass1 for long and short ranges1 for small or great velocity4 ,the rate1 weight1 length1 charges1 point blank1 extreme range1 c41 of iron guns1 will be found in the annexed table1 by which will be seen1 at a glance1 the various matters referred to4 ,,iron ,,ordnance4 ---------------------------------------- ------------------ ,nature ,charge ,point ,extreme of ,weight4,length4 of ,blank at ,windage ,gun4 ,powder4 ,range4#e deg4 decreased4 ---------------------------------------- ------------------ ,pounders4 cwts4 ft4 in4lbs4 ozs4 yards4 yards4 #cb #fc #i #g #aj #aj-a_/b #chj #aiej -- #cb #ef #i #f #aj #aj-a_/b #chj #aiej -- #cb #dh #h #j #h #j #ccj #agdj -- #cb #dj #g #f #f #j #cdj #agjj #jf #cb #cb #f #f #e #j #ccj #afdj #aa #cb #be #f #j #d #j #bbe #aejj #aa #cb #be #e #d #d #j #bbe #aejj #aa #bd #ej #i #f #h #j #cfj #ahej -- #bd #dh #i #j #h #j #cfj #ahej -- #bd #dj #g #f #h #j #cdj #ahjj -- #bd #cc #f #f #f #j #bfj #aefj -- #ah #db #i #j #f #j #cfj #aghj -- #ah #ch #h #j #f #j #cdj #agcj -- #ab #cd #i #j #d #j #cfj #agjj -- #ab #bi #g #f #d #j #cdj #afej -- #i #bf #g #f #c #j #ccj #afjj -- #f #ag #f #j #b #j #cbj #aebj -- ,carronades4 #fh #cf #e #d #e #aj-a_/b #bgj #adbj -- #db #bb #d #f #c #h #bdj #acej -- #cb #ag #d #j #b #aj-a_/b #bce #abfj -- #bd #ac #c #i #b #j #bbe #aaej -- #ah #aj #c #d #a #h #bbj #aajj -- #ab #f #b #h #a #j #bje #ajjj -- ---------------------------------------- ------------------ ,brass guns are invariably lighter1 and considered less likely to burst4 ,gun metal1 technically so called1 is a compound of copper and tin1 in the proportion of five1 eight1 and ten pounds of the latter to #ajj pounds of the former4 ,the peculiar property of the tin is to give hardness and solidity to the mass4 ,the greater proportions are used principally for mortars1 as they require a greater degree of hardness than other guns4 ,a peculiar property attaches to the using of brass guns4 ,if a considerable number of rounds be fired in rapid succession1 the bore of the gun becomes to a certain extent elliptical4 ,this peculiarity arises entirely from the extreme windage allowed by the present established rules of ,british gunnery2 and is produced by the tendency of the shot1 when propelled by the explosive force1 to strike upwards from the breech1 and then rebound downwards1 and so on till it reaches the muzzle4 ,iron guns are not liable to this 7although the same cause exists7 from the unductile nature of the cast iron4 ,brass guns are1 after certain use1 recast3 this is done solid1 with the cascable of the gun downwards1 to give a greater density to the metal at the breech4 ,the boring and turning are performed simultaneously by a very simple arrangement4 ,at the siege of ,badajos1 the firing continued for #ajd hours1 and the number of rounds that each gun fired averaged #a1bdi2 and at the siege of ,sebastian1 the quantity fired by each gun was about #cej rounds1 in #ae-a_/b hours4 ,these guns being of iron1 none of them were rendered unserviceable2 though three times the number of brass guns would not have been equal to such long and rapid firing4 ,all brass guns are bouched with a bolt of copper at the vent1 on the same principle as flint guns for sporting were formerly with gold or platina2 copper withstanding the rapid escape of the flame better than the gun-metal4 ,the charges1 ranges1 c41 are as follows3-- ,,extreme ,,and ,,point ,,blank ,,range ,,of ,,brass ,,ordnance1 ,,charge1 ,c4 ---------------------------------------- ------------------------- ,charge4,point ,extreme,eleva- ---- ,blank ,range4 tion4 ---- ,range4 ---------------------------------------- ------------------------- lb4 oz4yards4 yards4 deg4 ,medium #ab-pounder #d #j #cjj #a1bjj #c ,light #ab-pounder #d #j #bjj #a1jjj #c #i-pounder #c #j #cjj #a1bjj #c ,with round solid ,long #f-pounder #b #j #cjj #a1bjj #c ,shot4 ,light #f-pounder #b #j #bjj #a1jjj #c ,heavy #c-pounder #a #j #bjj #a1jjj #c #bd-pounder howitzer #b #h #bej #iej #c-a_/b #ab-pounder ,with common ,shells4 howitzer #a #d #bjj #iej #c-c_/d ,when ,shot is fired1 ,heavy #e-a_/b-;inch they increase the howitzer #b #j #bej #a1gej #ab elevation #a_/b a deg4 ,light #e-a_/b-;inch howitzer #b #j #ajj #a1cej #b ---------------------------------------- ------------------------- ,the twelve1 ten1 and eight-inch guns1 almost form a class of themselves1 known as the 8,paixhan ,gun40 ,they are intended for throwing both hollow and solid shot4 ,the larger are the description of ordnance with which we at present arm our steam frigates4 ,these are unquestionably part of the many doubtful descriptions of artillery which have been adopted of late years1 with a view to fracture more than to secure a range of projectile4 ,they are enormous machines1 as will be seen on reference to their weights1 as given in the following table2 and their splintering powers are certainly very extensive indeed4 ,but their range is contemptibly small1 if we take into consideration their great weight4 ,the effect of the explosion of the charge of one of these guns must be sensibly felt even by the strongest built steamer in the world4 ,they are used with traversing beds4 ,the gun carriage1 when recoiling1 in a backward direction1 being driven up an inclined railway1 with from #c to #d of elevation1 from the cascable of the gun4 ,this greatly tends to lessen the distance which the gun would be driven back1 and facilitates the running out of the piece to the point of discharge4 ,the woodcut gives a representation of the traversing beds2 and the following table displays the ranges1 c41 of this class of heavy artillery4 ,illustration ,,range ,,and ,,elevation1 ,c41 ,,of #ab1 #aj1 ,,and #h-;,,inch ,,guns1 ,,at ,,point ,,blank ,,and ,,extreme1 ,,and #aj ,,and #h-;,,inch ,,howitzers4 ---------------------------------------- ------------------------ ,charge ,point ,extreme,eleva- ,nature of ,ordnance4 ,length4 ,weight4 ,powder4 ,blank ,range4tion4 ,range4 ---------------------------------------- ------------------------ ft4 in4 cwt4 qr4lbs4 ozs4yards4yards4 deg4 #ab-;inch gun1 with hollow shot1 #h #d #ij #c #ab #j #bdj #a1eej #f weight #aab lbs4 #aj-;inch1 with ditto1 weight #hf #g #f #eg #c #g #j #baj #a1ejj #f lbs4 ,ditto #h #d #fb #a #h #j #bej #a1djj #e ,ditto #i #d #hd #j #ab #j #cbe #a1gjj #e #h-;inch gun1 with hollow shot1 #dh #f #h-a_/b #ej #j #g #j #baj #a1cjj #e lbs4 #h-;inch ditto1 solid shot1 #fh #h #f #fj #j #i #g #cdj #a1ejj #e lbs4 ,ditto #i #j #fe #j #aj #j #cjj #c1bej #ae ,ditto1 hollow shot #i #j #fe #j #ab #j #cgj #b1ibj #ae #aj-;inch iron howitzers #e #j #dj #j #g #j #b deg4 #b1jgh #ab #fjj #h-;inch ditto #d #j #ba #j #d #j #c deg4 #a1gbe #ab #gcj ---------------------------------------- ------------------------ #b ,length of time occupied in flight1 #ad seconds1 and #ae-a_/d seconds4 ,mortars are intended for three purposes2 firstly1 to bombard a town1 or injure the defenders' artillery2 secondly1 to fire or overthrow the works1 and to spread havoc and slaughter among the troops2 thirdly1 to break through the vaulted roofs of barracks and magazines which are not bomb-proof1 or1 in other terms1 are not strong enough to resist the fire4 ,they consist1 as will be seen1 of five descriptions1 but the #aj-;inch is considered1 on the score of economy1 as equal to all useful purposes4 ,the ,french have1 at various times1 constructed mortars of enormously large dimensions1 but certainly with no useful result4 ,the monster mortar1 used at the siege of ,antwerp1 fired only ten or twelve shots1 and with comparatively little effect4 ,it burst some time after1 while under a course of experiment1 with a considerably less charge than it had formerly withstood2 thus affording one very conclusive and illustrative fact in the theory of vibrations in metals3 for there can be no question but that the shell1 from the smallness of the charge1 was too long detained in the mortar2 the waves of vibration caused by the explosive force moving so rapidly through the mass that the metal at last lost its cohesive nature from their very rapid succession4 ,it will be perceived1 on reference to the adjoining tables1 that ranges are obtained by the modifications of charges4 ,,english ,,mortar ,,practice4#c #c ,artillerist's ,manual4 ---------------------------------------- ------------------------ #ac-;,,inch ,,iron4 #aj-;,,inch ,,iron4 ,weight1 #af cwts4 #af cwts4 #b qrs4 ,shell filled1 #bjj lbs4#d #ib lbs4 ,bursting powder1 #f lbs4 #b ozs4 #b lbs4 #aj ozs4 ,blowing powder1 #b ozs4 #a-a_/b ozs4 ---------------------------------------- ------------------ ,ele- ,charge4 ,fuse4,range4 ,ele- ,charge4 ,fuse4,range4 vation4 vation4 ---------------------------------------- ------------------- deg4 lbs4 ozs4 inch4yards4 deg4 lbs4 ozs4 inch4yards4 #de #b #a-a_/b #aij #dej #de #a #j-a_/b #aij #dej #b #c #bjj #ejj #a #b #bjj #ejj #b #d-c_/d #baj #eej #a #c-a_/d #baj #eej #b #f #bbj #fjj #a #d-c_/d #bbj #fjj #b #g-c_/d #bcj #fej #a #f #bcj #fej #b #i-a_/b #bdj #gjj #a #g-a_/b #bdj #gjj #b #aa-c_/d #bde #gej #a #i #bde #gej #b #ad #bej #hjj #a #aj #bej #hjj #c #j-a_/b #bee #hej #a #aa #bee #hej #c #c #bfj #ijj #a #ab #bfj #ijj #c #e-a_/b #bfe #iej #a #ac #bfe #iej #c #h #bgj #a1jjj #a #ad #bgj #a1jjj #c #aj #bge #a1jej #a #ae-a_/d #bge #a1jej #c #ab #bhj #a1ajj #b #j-a_/b #bhj #a1ajj #c #ad #bhe #a1aej #b #a-c_/d #bhe #a1aej #d #j #bij #a1bjj #b #c #bij #a1bjj ---------------------------------------- ------------------ ------------------------------------ #h-;,,inch ,,iron4 #h cwts4 #a qr4 #df lbs4 #a lb4 #ad ozs4 #a oz4 --------------------------------- ,elevation4 ,charge4 ,fuse4,range4 --------------------------------- deg4 lbs4 ozs4 inch4yards4 #ae #j #ad #jhj #ejj #a #j #ajj #eej #a #b #aaj #fjj #de #j #i-a_/b #aij #dej #j #aj-c_/d #bjj #ejj #j #ab-a_/b #baj #eej #j #ac-c_/d #bbj #fjj #j #ad-a_/b #bcj #fej #j #ae-a_/b #bdj #gjj #a #j #bde #gej #a #j-a_/b #bej #hjj #a #a-a_/d #bee #hej #a #b #bfj #ijj #a #b-c_/d #bfe #iej #a #c-a_/b #bgj #a1jjj #a #d #bge #a1jej #a #d-c_/d #bhj #a1ajj #a #e-a_/d #bhe #a1aej #a #f #bij #a1bjj --------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- ------------------------ #e-a_/b-;,,inch ,,brass4 #d #b-eth-,,inch ,,brass4 ,weight1 #a cwt4 #a qr4 #aj lbs4 #c qrs4 #ai lbs4 ,shell filled1 #af lbs4#e #h lbs4 ,bursting powder1 #aj ozs4 #e ozs4 ,blowing powder1 #a_/b oz4 #a_/b oz4 ---------------------------------------- ------------------ ,elevation4,charge4 ,fuse4,range4,elevation4 ,charge4,fuse4,range4 ---------------------------------------- ------------------ deg4 ozs4 dr4inch4yards4 deg4 ozs4 dr4inch4yards4 #ae #f #j #jgc #cej #ae #d #h #jhj #dej #g #j #jge #djj #d #ab #jhe #ejj #g #h #jhj #dej #be #d #j #aaj #edj #h #j #jhe #ejj #be #e #h #aaj #dhj #de #d #h #cjj #de #b #f #afe #cjj #d #ab #cej #b #i #agj #cej #e #j #age #djj #b #ab #age #djj #e #d #ahj #dej #c #j #ahj #dej #e #h #ahe #ejj #c #d #ahe #ejj #e #ab #aij #eej #c #h #aij #eej #f #j #aie #fjj #c #ab #aie #fjj ---------------------------------------- ------------------ #d ,shells filled with sand1 which will account for the weight4 #e ,shells filled with sand1 which will account for the weight4 #ac-;,,inch ,,land ,,service4 #aj-;,,inch ,,ditto4 #h-;,,inch ,,ditto4 ,greatest charge1 #h pounds powder4 #d-a_/b pounds4 #a pound4 ,greatest range1 #b1gjf yards4 #b1ecf yards4 #a1gbj yards4 ,,weight ,,of ,,land ,,and ,,sea ,,service ,,mortar4 ,inches4 cwts4 qrs4 lbs4 ,inches4 #ac ,land service1 ,weight1 #cf #b #j ,length1 #cfefc #aj do4 #af #b #j #bhabe #h do4 #h #b #ad #bbejj #e-a_/b do4 brass1 #a #a #ae #aeajd #d-b_/c do4 do4 #j #c #bj #abgac #ac ,sea service1 #ajj #a #ad #ebhaj #aj do4 #eb #j #j #defbj ,illustration ,carronades are a short description of ordnance without trunnions1 but fastened by a loop under the reinforce4 ,their construction is materially different from that of guns4 ,they have a chamber like a mortar1 a part scooped out inside the muzzle1 forming a cup1 and they have also a patch on the reinforce4 ,the name arises from the ,carron ,foundry in ,scotland1 the first of them having been cast there in #aggi4 ,the construction is considerably lighter than that of guns of similar calibre4 ,their principal use is on board ship2 but they are sometimes used in casemates1 or retired flanks of fortresses4 ,the proportions of all guns to shot1 will be found below2 and in looking at this table1 it will scarce be conceivable how such light guns can project such heavy shot4 ,,comparative ,,weights ,,of ,,guns ,,and ,,shot4 ------------------------------------- ,weight ,comparative ---- of ,weight4 ,guns4 ------------------------------------- cwts4 #ab-;inch ,gun #ij #a to #aab #aj do4 #hd #a #hb #h do4 #fe #a #ajg #h do4 #fj #a #if #h do4 #ej #a #hb #cb-pounder #fd #a #bbd ,do4 #ef #a #aif ,do4 #dh #a #afh ,do4 #dj #a #adj ,do4 #cb #a #aab ,do4 #be #a #hd #bd-pounder #ej #a #bcc ,do4 #dh #a #bai ,do4 #db #a #ahf #ah-pounder #db #a #bfa ,do4 #cg-a_/b #a #bcc #ab-pounder #cd #a #cah ,do4 #bi #a #bgj ,do4 #ba #a #aif #i-pounder #ca #a #bhe ,do4 #bf #a #cbc ,do4 #ag #a #baa #f-pounder #bc #a #dbi ,do4 #ag #a #cbg #fh-pound ,carronades #cj #a #ei #db do4 #bb-a_/d #a #eh #cb do4 #ag #a #fb #cb do4 #be #a #if #bd do4 #ac #a #ee #ah do4 #aj #a #ef #ab do4 #f #a #ef ------------------------------------- ,the recoil1 which in all the before-mentioned guns is very great1 arises from the blow communicated to the iron in immediate contact with the explosive fluid4 ,the granulatory system of the metal transmits to those grains1 or crystals1 immediately behind them1 the blow or concussion they are subjected to1 and these again to others1 and so on1 until the vibration has passed through the metal1 from the interior of the breech to the exterior of the gun4 ,i am satisfied that in all small guns1 from their slight substance1 recoil is communicated a great deal quicker than in larger ones2 hence arises the well-known fact that in shooting you receive a knock nearly simultaneous with the explosion4 ,the greater and heavier the gun 7even carry it up to ,general ,miller's gun of #hd cwt47 if the proportion which the shot bears to it be not too great1 the less will be the velocity of recoil4 ,but in carronades1 as will be seen1 the proportions are as high as #a to #ee1 while in long guns1 it is #a to #dbi2 a very considerable degree of difference4 ,our ancestors had but a limited knowledge of the laws of projecting bodies by gunpowder4 ,their explosive power was not good2 for there is clear proof1 even since the time of ,robins1 that the purification of the ingredients has nearly doubled the explosive force4 ,the mechanical construction and outer mould of their guns1 were calculated to resist and limit the effects of recoil to a great extent4 ,accumulation of metal in the rear of the breech-end of a gun is true science1 and of so easy an attainment1 that wonder arises in the mind why it has not been effected4 ,the extent to which this principle is worked upon in our gunnery is very trifling2 though recoil can by this simple arrangement be nearly destroyed1 or so lessened as to add considerable percentage of range to the projectile4 ,add no considerable weight to the gun1 but add it judiciously1 behind the end of the chamber and vent1 and immediately surrounding the breech4 ,i have tried this to a great extent1 on a small scale1 8with fowling-piece barrels10 and find that the greatest advantage arises from an additional inch of metal to the extreme end of the barrel1 as the recoil is thereby lessened2 while1 on the contrary1 by reducing the exterior end of the breech1 until it becomes of less thickness than the sides of the barrel1 the recoil is doubled4 ,guns will some day be constructed as mortars are1 with the axles1 or trunnions1 in rear of the tube and of the vent2 for by this arrangement recoil would act less on the mass of metal forming the gun1 and more on the base from which it is fired4 ,we are quite aware that an arrangement of this nature could only be applied to certain descriptions of ordnance1 and in certain situations2 but on forts1 or batteries commanding rivers and bays1 and even in the bows of steam vessels1 they may be placed with great advantage4 ,but this objection may be started3 8,you could not use guns fitted in this manner horizontally1 or nearly so40 ,why not8 ,the muzzle could be as easily raised or depressed as the breech1 by mechanical means4 ,i should much like to see the principle tried1 and ,i hope to do so4 ,the following results of experiments prove1 that if a true basis is not laid down1 all the fabric raised upon it is but one of sand1 which will crumble away from under us4 ,hutton says1--8,varying the weight of the gun1 produced no change in the velocity of the ball4 ,the guns were suspended in the same manner as the pendulous blocks1 and additional weights were attached to the pieces1 so as to restrain the recoil2 but although the arcs of the recoil were thus shortened1 yet the velocity of the ball was not altered by it4 ,the recoil was then entirely prevented1 but the initial velocity of the ball remained the same40 ,no doubt this was the result of his experiments by the pendulous suspension of the gun3 but here he erred2 for had he suspended a thousand tons to it1 without incorporating it in the gun1 the result would still have been the same4 ,all the improvements effected1 or yet to be accomplished1 will be obtained by a concentration of metal4 ,an excess of weight in the fore part of a gun is very injurious1 by inducing and lengthening the tremulous vibration created by the explosion4 ,the only necessity for strength forward in a cannon1 arises from the necessity of resisting the lateral pressure from the condensation of the column of air in the tube4 ,the pressure of the explosive gases is1 by the velocity obtained before reaching the fore part1 of very little amount1 from the short period it is exerted on the interior4 ,therefore weight1 in the fore part of a gun1 be it ever so great1 will not prevent recoil if there is not a proportionate quantity behind4 ,it will retard or lessen the distance to which the recoil will drive the gun and carriage1 but the evil is then over4 ,if the slightest movement occurs in the gun1 the shot is projected from an unsound base or foundation4 ,it is precisely similar to a man who1 in the act of throwing a stone1 slips his foot backwards3 the effect is at once apparent on the stone4 ,if the trunnion of a gun breaks in the discharge1 or a quoin flies out1 the shot is materially affected2 never ranging1 under such circumstances1 the accustomed distance1 nor with its usual accuracy4 ,practice with mortars proves beyond dispute the necessity of a firm base for the gun1 for with a much less charge they project a greater mass farther4 ,a mortar discharged on land1 exceeds in range the same description of gun on board of ship1 or on the best-constructed platform4 ,in truth1 this is but another illustration of a law of nature3 if you have not a solid fulcrum1 it matters little what the power of your lever may be4 ,gunpowder is a powerful lever if exploded on a solid base2 if not1 its effects become limited in proportion4 ,unquestionably1 much may yet be gained by an economical arrangement of our projectile force4 ,great and rapid as have been the acquisitions of knowledge in everything relating to gunnery in modern times1 there still remains1 ,i have no doubt1 an unexplored mine of valuable treasure to be added to the science4 ,it would effect a great improvement in the mortars used by the navy1 destroying the tremendous vibration and shake given to the ship1 increasing their efficiency and aiding the projecting power1 to place them on beds of the softest lead1 not less than twelve inches in thickness4 ,though this suggestion is only theoretical1 experience would soon determine the least degree of substance available4 ,advantage would arise1 in the first place1 from the non-conducting tendency of the lead2 in the second1 from its density1 and1 of course1 incompressibility4 ,the one protecting the ship1 the other being the most solid bed for the mortar that can by possibility be obtained4 ,the weight of a hollow #ac-;inch shell is #aij lbs42 the bursting powder #f lbs4 #h oz42 the weight1 if cast solid1 would be #bij lbs43 thus the action of so large a body on the atmosphere must be immense of itself4 ,there seems to be much difficulty in projecting masses of great diameter1 from this cause2 and this should lead us to seek1 as indeed it points to1 another material for fabricating projectiles4 ,as weight is less in substance1 and1 of course1 less in space1 much less resistance1 in proportion1 will exist in a bore of six inches than in one of twelve2 and a greater projectile force will be generated with fewer countervailing disadvantages4 ,the first step in the vast improvements about to be effected in gunnery1 has been successfully taken by ,mr4 ,monk1 of ,woolwich arsenal1 who has induced the authorities to allow a gun to be made from drawings and calculations of his own4 ,the dimensions of the gun are as follows3 length from cascable to muzzle1 #aa feet2 weight1 #ig cwt4 #c qrs42 bore1 #g-g_/aj inches2 weight of solid shot1 #ee lbs42 shell1 #db lbs42 windage1 #jage2 charge1 #af lbs4 of powder2 giving a range1 at #cb of elevation1 of #e1cbg yards4 ,a compound shot1 7a shell filled with lead71 was projected #e1gbj yards1 or three miles and a quarter1 at a velocity1 during the first second of time1 of #b1djj feet per second1 and occupying during the whole flight only #bi-a_/b seconds4 ,the comparative weight of gun and shot is #a to #bbj4 ,a course of experiments1 extending over seventeen years1 has firmly established this gun as the best ever yet constructed4 ,many attempts have been made to excel it1 but all have failed4 ,guns have been made on drawings varying not more than three-tenths of an inch in their dimensions from those of his gun1 and1 with extreme modesty1 the individuals have claimed a right to compete with ,mr4 ,monk2 and have even obtained competing trials1 without any claim whatever to the discovery of the principle of it2 coming into competition by no just claim or merit1 but solely from the tendency to supersede any improvement emanating from a civilian4 ,eighteen1 twenty-four1 and thirty-two pounders are now1 however1 constructed on this model2--indeed the improvement is so great and so apparent1 as to overcome every obstacle as yet thrown in its way4 ,with no wish to detract from the merit of ,mr4 ,monk's invention 7upon which ,i congratulate him and the country7 but1 in justice to myself1 ,i may remind some of my readers1 that in 8,the ,gun10 published early in #ahce1 ,i clearly laid down the principle in projectile force1 on which this gun is constructed2 and as he has since so successfully accomplished this great improvement1 he must permit me to say1 that the principle is the same which ,i have striven for1 for many years4 ,wilkinson says1 8,guns cast on this principle1 although several hundredweight lighter altogether1 recoil less than those on the old plan1 with equal charges of powder and ball1 in consequence of the weight being properly distributed40 ,he adds1 8,one remarkable fact attended these experiments1 namely1 that by increasing the windage a little1 the range was increased also1 contrary to the received opinion2 but this may be explained by the circumstance1 that with very great velocities1 and long guns1 the column of air to be displaced before the ball quits the gun is considerable1 and is condensed so rapidly1 that it offers immense resistance to the passage of the bullet1 if it fit the bore closely2 but1 by reducing the size of the ball1 and thus increasing the windage1 the air has more space to rush round it1 and the ball escapes with greater facility40 ,if the condensed air prevented the velocity being greater1 it argues most clearly1 that there was an insufficiency of explosive matter to keep up the velocity until the ball of less windage left the muzzle2 and the result with the ball of greater windage establishes this assumption4 ,for if the condensed air was allowed to pass the ball by the windage into the tube1 it proves beyond doubt that there was a deficiency of matter there1 or that the pressure without was greater than that within4 ,how otherwise could such a result occur8 ,it is a clearly established fact1 that with the generality of ordnance1 a full waste of one-fourth of explosive force1 if not more1 occurs by the elastic fluid escaping past the ball by the windage1 instead of the reverse4 ,neither could the condensed air rush into the gun by the windage if there are any permanent gases generated2 which ,mr4 ,wilkinson himself says there are1 to the extent of 8#bej times the bulk of the powder in grain40 ,these would offer a sufficient resistance to prevent the condensed air rushing in4 ,i have found1 by an experiment before described1 that a ball driven against a column of air which has no escape1 if the velocity be trifling1 say #hjj feet per second1 the air will escape by the windage2 but double this even1 and it is so condensed as to form a cushion for the ball to strike against4 ,then how much less will the chance be of its escaping1 if the velocity become two thousand four hundred feet per second4 ,no1 the cause is remote from that of ,mr4 ,wilkinson's supposition4 ,there is a want of force--an accelerative propellant force--which should continue to the end of the tube1 be that length ever so great2 and on this point1 for one1 turns the whole future improvement of gunnery4 ,the result wished for can be obtained by a systematical arrangement of the granulation of powder4 ,that a much greater velocity than is obtained in this gun--at present the greatest in any piece of ordnance in use1 and possessing a longer range than has been obtained by any power in ,europe--may and will be attained1 ,i fearlessly assert4 ,i have obtained a velocity with an ounce ball nearly doubling this2 and though1 as it will be argued1 this may be too limited an experiment1 yet let us not forget that great results most frequently spring from little causes4 ,large rivers owe their origin to small springs1 and if the same principle by which we can penetrate a plate of iron half an inch thick with an ounce of lead1 be fearlessly and judiciously carried through1 we may 7and no doubt we shall7 live to see projectiles thrown #e-a_/d miles4 ,that this will be difficult to accomplish ,i deny3 no difficulty attends it1 provided the principles before explained are duly carried out4 ,the great principle in a propellant force is so to arrange it that you do not obtain too great a velocity at the first move of the projectile2 as no mass can be forced from a state of rest to a rapid state of motion1 without communicating to the gun a corresponding motion1 which will create a recoil3 and the greater the motion1 the greater the recoil4 ,if the explosive matter merely expands for a brief period1 and is burnt out before the shot has reached midway the length of the gun1 the velocity there acquired will be reduced1 by the condensed column of air in the other half of the barrel1 to the velocity it possessed when only one fourth the length of the whole from the breech2 consequently it would be advantageous to cut the gun in two at the middle1 as a greater force would be then generated advantageously1 than by the whole4 ,but if you so arrange the granulation of your powder that it shall proceed into motion more gradually1 a rapidly increasing force of elastic fluid will continue to be generated1 until it reaches its greatest maximum of velocity 7which it should do just as the ball leaves the muzzle7 then you obtain with your means the greatest result possible4 ,we believe that the generality of gunpowder used by our ,government is vastly inferior in strength to some made by private makers2 yet it is not advisable to jump from one extreme to another4 ,what is wanted is the proper blending of the qualities2 an addition of a quantity of ,harvey's quick powder to a charge1 when it has driven the ball up three-fourths of the tube of a gun1 and probably had acquired a velocity of #b1jjj feet per second1 might so aid it1 that it would leave the muzzle with a velocity of #c1jjj4 ,you cannot put a locomotive train in motion at once3 if it were attempted1 you would break all the carriages2 but if you gradually add your force1 you gain in time the greatest possible velocity4 ,i have drawn a parallel case3 it is the same with gunpowder2 only the velocities are widely different4 ,therefore1 ,i may be pardoned1 if ,i say gunnery is like steam1 but in its infancy4 ,let us but clearly see and understand aright the principle--knowing that the greater momentum the less the action of the atmosphere--and if #c-a_/d miles can be obtained with a ball #fj lbs4 weight1 #e-a_/d may be easily accomplished by a ball of #abj lbs4 ,powder is made1 and can be had1 that will do this4 ,the use of compound-shot has of late years become quite common in experiments3 why lead1 with its alloys1 has not been more extensively used as a projectile for large guns1 has always appeared to me extraordinary4 ,its weight and density peculiarly fit it for this purpose1 and its non-conducting principle is its greatest recommendation4 ,how is it8 ,in no instance1 except as compound-shot1 do we find any record of the use of leaden bullets on a large scale1 save in ,sir ,howard ,douglas's 8,naval ,gunnery10 where1 in a note1 he says1 8,a very distinguished naval commander mentioned to me1 that he knew a person who had served in an ,american privateer1 which1 being out of shot1 and unable to procure a supply of iron balls1 used leaden shot as substitutes4 ,this person always mentioned with great surprise the superior effect of leaden balls40 ,well he might2 for the reader need not be told that its greater specific gravity would add to its momentum1 and a longer medium velocity be retained during its flight4 ,but it possesses another recommendation1 superior to all these1 in warfare3 that of communicating all its force1 all its velocity1 be they ever so great1 to the body struck4 ,iron does not possess this quality2 except to a certain extent1 and that at low velocities4 ,hence the cause of its being found in naval warfare1 that balls at low velocities damage and destroy ships' sides more than at higher velocities1 even when passing quite through4 ,lead1 in the act of striking hard substances1 iron or stone for instance1 is partially flattened1 until the flat surface is nearly equal to the diameter of the sphere of the ball2 thus parting with all the force it struck the object with1 and in most instances falling motionless at the base of the object struck2 while in the stone1 the surrounding crystals or grains are1 by their abrasion on each other1 pounded into dust1 in proportion to the size and force of the body of lead striking them3 in many instances to many times the shot's bulk1 and only flattening the lead1 less or more1 in proportion to the capability of the stone to resist4 ,iron striking stone retains its shape3 the grains are driven back upon each other1 and each offering its proportion of elasticity1 the ball is enabled to rebound back2 which it does in many instances to a considerable percentage of the whole distance it had been projected4 ,the greater the velocity with which an iron ball is projected the greater the rebound back from a hard substance such as stone4 ,reversely1 the greater the velocity of lead1 the greater its effect on the object struck4 ,walls or fortifications struck by leaden balls at the same velocities 7waiving the advantage to lead by its greater specific gravity7 would be pounded into sand by less than two-thirds the same number of lead as of iron shot4 ,any unprejudiced person may soon satisfy himself of this1 by trying it with a musket or fowling piece4 ,a leaden ball will pound itself a hole many times its own bulk1 while an iron ball will not make a hole half its size4 ,i have tried many experiments to ascertain the penetrating powers of iron and lead relatively1 by striking various objects1 from a boiler plate of half an inch thickness down to fir deals4 ,the same size of lead will1 under certain circumstances1 punch a perfect hole in a plate of half-inch thickness1 as ,i shall have occasion to show2 while1 under precisely the same arrangement1 the iron ball would rebound back with very little diminution of force2 and if the plate of iron be at a perfect right angle1 the iron ball would nearly return into the muzzle1 of the gun4 ,in truth1 ,i had a narrow escape seventeen years ago1 from a bullet actually cutting the rim of my hat3 so that it will be well1 when experimenting in this way1 to be sure that the person is well esconced1 for fear of unpleasant results4 ,lead1 therefore1 for destroying ships1 as well as stone walls1 is unquestionably highly advantageous2 even if projected with the same velocities as at present adopted for iron4 ,the additional weight would not decrease the destructive effects2 it would augment them4 ,i perfectly agree with the ,american privateer1 that the wonderfully destructive power of leaden cannon balls will create surprise1 whenever they shall come generally into use4 ,imagine the effect from a gun of the dimensions of a #aj-;inch bore4 ,it is dreadful to contemplate4 ,the effect of lead will be easily understood when explained in the following way4 ,if a #cf lb4 shot have a velocity of #b1jjj feet per second1 the force is equal to the velocity multiplied by the weight1 or #gb1jjj lbs4 ,the whole of this force would strike a wall1 and be left there1 if communicated by soft lead2 if by iron1 at the same velocity1 it would be minus the amount of force required to make it rebound to the great distance to which iron invariably returns4 ,though created by the elasticity of the iron itself1 this must be deducted from the effect produced1 and hence arises the great advantage the lead possesses4 ,we are aware that iron driven with a slight velocity rebounds less2 true1 and less is its real effect2 for under the very same circumstances would the great advantages of the lead predominate4 ,it may be objected1 that lead is too easily misshaped2 8pure it is1 but with alloys not so40 ,at low velocities it might1 but the greater velocities diminish that chance1 as it is a well known fact that all dense incompressible bodies are least affected by an extremely sharp motion4 ,all our arrangements in warlike preparations1 at present1 involve great weight of projectile for fracturing1 not perforating4 ,during the siege of ,ciudad ,rodrigo1 #b1aei rounds1 of twenty-four and eighteen pounders1 were requisite to form the small breach of thirty feet wide1 and #f1dgh rounds for the larger of #ajj feet4 ,at ,badajos there was expended1 to form three breaches of #dj1 #ij1 and #aej feet respectively1 the enormous amount of #ca1hfa rounds of the same sized iron shot4 ,we may be pardoned if we presume to say1 one-half the number of lead shot would have done more1 and done it better4 ,if we bear in mind1 that the whole round of experiments from which ,hutton drew his deductions1 were conducted with iron projectiles1 the inconsistency of taking his data as the standard will be apparent4 ,the dissimilitude of specific gravities being great1 namely1 #g1dbe and #aa1cbg--or one-third difference--it clearly shows1 without any effort of the imagination1 that the range must be in the same proportion1 with the addition of greater momentum4 ,for it will scarcely be denied1 that a ball of gold or platina1 from the same cause1 will maintain a velocity longer1 and consequently range further1 than even lead4 ,hutton's theory only establishes the principle1 that the lighter the body projected1 the sooner it is acted upon by atmospheric resistance1 and a medium velocity induced4 ,we cannot attribute his preferring iron to arise from an opinion of its penetrating to greater depths2 for a man of his extensive knowledge and research could scarcely be guilty of such an error4 ,but even in our enlightened times we are told that elephants cannot be killed with any projectile but steel3 leaden balls cannot do it4 ,i should like to try1 and receive the tusks in return4 ,the shrapnell shell 7invented by ,general ,shrapnell71 or spherical case shot1 introduced into the ,british service of late years1 is probably the most destructive of any missile in use4 ,it was intended to supersede--which it has done--canister and grape shot2 effecting the same results at treble the range4 ,the construction and principle are very simple1 being merely a shell of an unusually light description2 in fact1 little more than a light cast-iron hollow ball1 with a fuse hole4 ,a certain quantity of leaden1 or iron bullets is put into it1 and the interstices around the ball shaken full of powder2 a fuse of the length required is inserted1 and explodes the shell during its flight3 the peculiarity being1 that the body of small balls retain their medium velocity and travel on1 merely diverging1 latterly1 like an immense charge of bird shot4 ,they are usually fired from howitzers1 carronades1 and other wide bored-guns1 at or near horizontal ranges4 ,a considerable delay occurred before they were successfully perfected4 ,it was found that when the small balls did not pack perfectly tight1 or were packed overtight1 the case frequently exploded in the gun3 occasioned1 no doubt1 by the friction creating a spark at the moment of the howitzer being fired1 and thus exploding the shell before its time2 but we believe such an occurrence rarely happens now1 from other improvements since adopted4 ,the preceding pages appeared in my last work published in #ahdf4 ,they are still so much in keeping with the state of gunnery at the present day1 and so prophetic of what has1 and is about to occur1 that they will be regarded1 ,i trust1 as bearing the stamp of authority4 ,progress1 in its rapid advance1 has made many ,english guns objects for the furnace or the museum2 and many guns1 which formerly ranked high as useful and important weapons1 have become things of the past4 ,monsters are now all the rage1 with a range of three miles1 and artillerists contemplate extending the range to double that distance2 whilst the projectiles used are not 8pounders10 but approximating to tons4 ,so much for improvement4 ,in political economy we are told that improvement to be good must be gradual2 but only effect some slight improvement in gunnery1 make but one step in advance1 and the desire for further improvement then ranges at will1 and impossibilities are craved for and sought to be attained4 ,twelve years ago the success of ,mr4 ,monck 7certainly the first modern improver of ordnance17 led to the unlimited production of undigested plans for changes in gunnery2 but1 unfortunately for the science1 no progress was made on the one great improvement of ,mr4 ,monck4 ,war found us ill prepared in the field1 and out-weighted 8afloat10 so that almost as many men were killed by the bursting of mortars1 and other ill-constructed guns1 as by the fire of the enemy3 so critical was our situation1 indeed1 that but for the general adoption in ,england's army of my great invention1 the rifle on the expansive or 8,greenerian0 principle1 and its skilful use by our brave soldiers1 the war had gone against us4 ,our rifles were equal in range to our artillery1 and this saved us2 whilst the enemy1 astonished at the effects produced by our bullets1 and conscious of their inferiority both in the construction and use of small arms1 abandoned the contest3 but no doubt with a firm determination to profit by their dear-bought experience4 ,it is generally admitted that our artillery was never so effective as that of the enemy1 and that more is due to the patient and enduring bravery of the ,british soldier than to our field-pieces and heavy ordnance4 ,that ,england's artillery was at this time most disgracefully inefficient1 it would be folly to deny4 ,the larger guns were destroyed in an inconceivably short space of time4 ,after five1 ten1 or fifteen rounds were fired the guns burst1 killing the gunners in great numbers4 ,the readers of my works are already familiar with my opinions on this subject1 and their value will now be enhanced by the fact that they have been proved to be the opinions of a 8practical man40 ,success in the improvement of small arms is a sure encouragement to those anxious for the advancement of projectile science1 and it is a coat of mail in which to fight against the prejudices and incompetency of official management4 ,who1 on reading my work of #ahda1 believed the prediction ,i therein made1 that small arms would be produced which would render field guns useless8 ,the fact is1 however1 firmly established1 that the best rifles on my principle will out-range by several hundred yards the best 8six-pounder0 in her ,majesty's service2 and that1 too1 with a repetition of fire wonderfully quick and effective3 as the ,russians in the ,crimea can testify1 on more than one occasion4 ,to endeavour to point out that an improvement may be effected in artillery equal to that which has been effected in small arms1 is the object of the following pages4 ,the author asks a dispassionate perusal and careful study of his work1 in justice to himself and to the importance of the subject4 ,judging of future probabilities by what has already been accomplished1 the reader will be prepared for what follows4 ,that great and important changes must take place in artillery cannot be doubted1 and should ,england refuse to avail herself of the improvements to be effected1 other nations1 and amongst them our late opponent1 will be the first to seize and adopt them4 ,in former works ,i have asked the indulgence of my military readers on account of my scanty military knowledge2 but professional men appear to be equally in the dark with the uninitiated3 indeed1 the lamentable shortcomings of the ,english artillerists have placed them in the rank of mere 8waiters upon providence0 for the next step towards improvement4 ,the present time is decidedly propitious2 let improvements now be made1 and we may surely hope that they will be appreciated by the public1 if not by the ,government authorities4 ,what is the best metal for cannon8 is a question which has often been asked1 and the answers have been very conflicting4 ,some have advocated mixtures of copper and tin2 others have advocated cast iron1 and more recently wrought iron2 still more recently steel1 and1 lastly1 cast steel1 have had their advocates4 ,arguments as plentiful as summer flowers have been advanced in favour of each1 and the argument has been carried on with a vast amount of prejudice and warmth1 according to the degree of acquaintance with or attachment to the favourite metal of each individual4 ,it is rare to meet with a mind free from bias1 equally well acquainted with the merits of the several metals1 and their application to the purposes intended4 ,still more rare is it to meet with a mind possessing all this metallurgic knowledge1 and combining with it an intimate acquaintance with the principles of projectiles1 as well as a scientific knowledge of the construction of the engine 7the perfection of which consists in its having no points which are weak or unnecessarily strong72 and yet it is by such a combination of knowledge and the application of these principles that we must be guided1 if we would be successful in the accumulation of projectile power4 ,in the present age we are really alive to the advantage of 8playing at long bowls20 and the question now to be determined is1 what is the greatest weight of shot and shell we can throw1 and how many miles can we project it4 ,the ,americans were undoubtedly the first to discover the great advantage of this question with their lesser frigates2 the late war has developed it still more2 and it now remains to be ascertained how much further can we go4 ,for on this important point the superior efficacy of artillery depends4 ,at ,st4 ,sebastian1 in #ahac1 cast-iron guns threw tons of shot at a range of #a1ejj yards2 some particular guns firing as many as #c1jjj rounds1 and yet it is more than probable that had the same guns been used in the ,crimea1 they would have burst with one-fourth the number of rounds4 ,experience proves that it is not the great number of rounds fired which strains and destroys the gun1 but the high elevation at which these guns are placed1 in order to get range2 this it is which shakes and disintegrates the crystalline structure of the metal1 and thus extreme range is obtained at extreme cost4 ,a gun which at #f of elevation could stand without a strain #bjj rounds1 would be likely at an elevation of #cj to burst before #ej rounds were fired4 ,the explanation of this is sufficiently simple4 ,a gun fired at #f recoils as the projectile is projected forward1 in proportion to its relative weight and friction2 but when brought up to an elevation above #cj the gun is entirely out of the horizontal1 and cannot recoil as it does at an elevation of #f3 the force is now exerted downward1 and the gun impinges on its support--i4 e41 either upon its bed on the deck of the ship1 or on the solid earth of the battery1 which is comparatively immovable2 thus the force which displaced the gun in the first instance is now exerted on the sides of the gun1 and the projectile receiving additional force is projected further4 ,but this increased range is obtained at the expense of the gun1 which is rapidly destroyed3 #ej rounds being sufficient to render it unfit for service4 ,to obviate this rapid destruction of cannon1 the metal has been changed from the molecular to the fibrous2 that is from cast iron to wrought iron4 ,one object of this chapter is to point out the difficulties which arise in determining what the best metal for cannon really is1 and to show the advantages to be gained by attending to the proper construction of projectile engines1 without attaching undue importance to the material of which they are made4 ,before rejecting cast iron as useless for the construction of large guns1 it would be well to assure ourselves that no better quality of metal can be produced than that which is at present manufactured4 ,we must also satisfy ourselves that we have clearly understood the proper shape and form of cannon to resist concussions4 ,these concussions1 be it remembered1 were more violent in the late than in any previous war2 and it is an undoubted fact that we had many more fractures then than on any previous occasion3 first1 on account of the strain produced by the great elevation required to get increased range2 and1 secondly1 on account of the imperfect shape of the gun4 ,the average number of rounds fired from the #ac-;inch mortars which burst at the bombardment of ,sweaborg was #abj1 and the fracture in all was peculiarly alike2 being at right angles to the supports4 ,now1 that this is due to the form of the gun cannot be doubted2 and it will be shown more fully in a subsequent page4 ,but there is another cause to which ,i wish now to direct attention1 viz41 the jamming of the ,lancaster shell1 which takes place in the increasing spiral of the oval gun at the very point where the projectile acquires a proportional increase of velocity4 ,the effect of this may be illustrated by running a locomotive at its maximum of speed over an increasing curve in the railroad1 with the certainty of landing it in an adjoining ditch4 ,the principle which determines the result is quite immutable3 viz41 that matter in rapid motion cannot be materially affected by any force inferior to the primary force3 the tendency of the body being to go straight forward2 whereas a slow train goes round a curve with the greatest ease4 ,two motions can easily be given to matter in a lower velocity2 but not so easily when the velocity is much increased4 ,hence ,i fear that the inventor of the ,lancaster gun must have had a misconception of the true laws of motion2 for by increasing the degree of spiral at the muzzle1 instead of at the breech of the gun1 he has rendered nearly useless what would otherwise have proved a most formidable engine of war4 ,from these observations it may1 ,i think1 fairly be doubted whether the bursting of cannon is owing entirely to the inferior quality of the cast iron used in their formation2 though there can1 ,i think1 be no doubt that ,english cast iron is not only much inferior to what it formerly was1 but that it is also inferior to that which is now manufactured in ,russia4 ,why it is so will be subsequently explained4 ,these defects in cast iron have naturally led to many attempts to substitute for it a more durable metal2 and in most cases the metal selected has been wrought iron4 ,wrought iron has been used1 not only in solid cannon1 but in the original 8hoop and stave30 8staves outside10 and 8staves inside10 as in ,mr4 ,mallet's monster mortar4 ,forms of gun as numerous as can be conceived have been constructed1 only to prove themselves in every case most complete failures4 ,our friends at the ,mersey ,works1 ,liverpool1 will1 no doubt1 demur to this assertion2 as 8all creations of the mind appear most perfect to the father of the thought40 ,great credit is1 however1 due to the enterprise and energy displayed by the inventors1 forgers1 and finishers of this great gun2 which has been the wonder of many minds in this age of wonders3 and it is a highly important invention1 as showing what we1 as a people1 are capable of producing by our mechanical and engineering skill4 ,but here1 in my estimation1 the wonder ceases2 for so sure as there is any truth in the ,scotch proverb1 8,a silk purse cannot be made out of a sow's lug10 so surely is it true that no man1 however great his genius and working powers1 can make a good cannon of wrought iron4 ,when the hardness and ductility of silver can be imparted to and held by lead1 then will it be possible to make wrought iron accomplish all the purposes required of a good cannon4 ,in vain may ,mr4 ,horsfall urge that his gun has never been burst4 ,why8 ,simply because it has not yet been subjected to the same amount of pressure on the square inch2 neither has it been tested at the same elevation as some other #aj-;inch guns1 which1 in proportion to their size have stood a more severe test4 ,it is a fact1 which may be clearly demonstrated1 that if a #aj-;inch gun of #ie cwt4 be fired at an elevation of #dj with #ag lbs4 of gunpowder1 then a gun of more than six times that weight would not be overloaded if its due proportion of powder were about #ajj lbs4 ,has this gun been fired with one half of this8 ,until it has been satisfactorily proved to this extent1 we feel sure that the authorities are justified in not considering ,mr4 ,horsfall's a successful achievement4 ,whatever may be ,mr4 ,horsfall's impression with regard to the advantages of wrought iron for making cannon1 ,i am satisfied1 after a long and careful study of the results of all its varieties1 from the most ordinary to the most perfect combination that has been manufactured--either for tenacity1 tenuity1 or resistance of lateral pressures--that it cannot answer in large guns4 ,this ,i think any one will admit1 after considering the two following facts2 which apply equally to all varieties and mixtures of wrought iron4 #a4 ,the strength of iron is at its maximum in the smallest mechanical structures4 #b4 ,the quality of the metal is improved as it is subjected to greater pressure and condensation4 ,the extent to which this improvement may be carried has never yet been ascertained2 every fresh manipulation improves its quality4 ,the tenacity of wrought iron is best displayed in a wire1 drawn out until it is not thicker than a human hair4 ,large masses of wrought iron are weak and spongy in geometrical progression with the mass1 and the crystalline or molecular form increases with the mass4 ,if large forgings are carefully examined1 crystals will be found whose facets would produce inches of surface2 as was clearly demonstrated by the bursting of a #aj-;inch gun at ,woolwich3 made1 if we mistake not1 by ,mr4 ,nasmyth4 ,another very important cause which renders large masses of wrought iron unsound 7and which was fatal in ,mr4 ,nasmyth's gun7 is the impossibility of condensing tons of wrought iron equally all through the mass4 ,no one has yet been able to overcome this difficulty4 ,when the force of a blow1 however great1 is exerted on the surface of a mass of metal1 its effect is neutralized within a few inches of the surface2 condensation takes place in inverse ratio from the point of impact1 and thus the effect is limited4 ,the force which produces this condensation tends also to elongate the fibres of the metal4 ,this elongation is greatest in the immediate vicinity of the force2 the fibres in the interior of the mass are less elongated therefore than on the exterior2 and the fibres in the interior of the mass being less ductile 7from the cause already explained7 than those on the exterior1 the interior of the mass elongates1 by disintegration of its fibres or crystals1 and a porous open mass is thus produced1 surrounded by a fibrous case4 ,instances of this are to be seen in broken engine-shafts and anchors2 and1 indeed1 in all large masses of wrought iron1 whether fractured by design or accident4 ,another cause of this defect in large masses of wrought iron1 is the long continued heat to which it is necessary to expose such large forgings4 ,the iron expands as it is heated1 but it does not expand equally all through the mass2 and the result of this is that the interior becomes porous and spongy3 an appearance which must have been observed by every one who has operated upon large masses4 ,the shaft of the ,leviathan weighs #bf tons2 but1 instead of resisting twenty-six times the pressure of a shaft one ton in weight1 it will1 from the causes already mentioned1 be found unequal to half that amount4 ,we have watched with much interest the forging of these immense shafts2 and the difficulties attending the forging of this structure prove the accuracy of our reasoning on the strength of large masses of wrought iron4 ,the weight of the shaft when finished is #bf tons1 and the waste during the process of welding amounts to #gd or #ge tons4 ,the present shaft is the third which has been manufactured2 the two first having proved notorious failures3 thus #bjj tons of iron have been wasted2 which we think is sufficient proof either of the unfitness of the material1 or of imperfection in the method of construction4 ,moreover1 ,i fear that when the vessel encounters a rolling sea1 the sudden check and strain produced by the total immersion of one paddle-wheel and the freedom of the other1 will subject the present shaft to a strain which will affect its duration2 and a vessel costing nearly a million of money may thus be left to reach her port with crippled powers of propulsion4 ,where1 it may be asked1 is the skill in devising engines more powerful than the ingenuity of man can beneficially work out8 ,this has indeed been done in the case of the ,leviathan2 a monster vessel has been built1 but all the engineering skill expended upon it has as yet been insufficient to bring it to perfection4 ,the skill hitherto displayed in welding large forgings of wrought iron into shafts1 or other large masses1 has been of a very low order2 much more may be done than has yet been accomplished1 if men will only set about it in a scientific manner4 ,the present mode of proceeding is to build a structure of iron much as a builder would raise a structure of bricks2 large and small pieces being mixed together until the requisite mass is obtained4 ,now1 a much simpler method1 and one which we have tried on several occasions1 is first to construct several segments of iron of the requisite length1 and of dimensions equivalent to the intended object2 each segment being fitted to fill its place amongst a given number of other segments 7whether twenty1 forty1 or fifty segments be required17 so as to form a complete cylinder2 as the wood-cut will fully explain3-- ,illustration ,in welding this structure1 the heat is equally diffused all through the mass2 and thus the great evil of unequal expansion and contraction is avoided4 ,when the steam hammer is brought into play1 its face is a 8swage0 of circular form1 calculated to clasp a large portion of the upper part1 whilst a corresponding space is formed in the anvil2 and by gradually turning the shaft1 the whole is forged into a perfect round4 ,the peculiar advantage gained by this mode of proceeding1 is not only the facility with which heat is diffused through the mass1 but that each segment is made to act like a wedge on its neighbour2 thus producing the most solid forging that has yet been attained4 ,this is rendered still more perfect1 both as regards strength and durability1 from the fact that a hollow axle has been produced2 the great advantages of which it would be out of place to dilate upon in this work4 ,we trust that these anticipated misfortunes may be avoided by the construction of a more perfect shaft2 and that1 not only for the sake of the shareholders1 but for the credit of the engineer who devised this great vessel--deservedly one of the wonders of the world4 ,a spare shaft would be profitable ballast1 if of no more value to the ,leviathan4 ,rolled railway-carriage axles were constructed for me with perfect success on this principle nearly twenty years ago1 at the ,walker ,iron ,works1 near ,newcastle-on-,tyne4 ,the idea has1 however1 been in a measure 8shelved20 but necessity will bring it into use again4 ,the only engineer who has1 by practical experience1 satisfied himself that large masses of wrought iron are totally useless for making heavy ordnance is ,mr4 ,nasmyth2 whose monster cannon1 which was to astonish the whole world1 proved1 when heated1 to have so little cohesion that it would scarcely hold together whilst being lifted from the furnace to the anvil4 ,and1 to his credit be it said1 ,mr4 ,nasmyth1 seeing that wrought iron would not answer the purpose1 manfully gave up his hopeless task4 ,similar experience would probably make some of our present engineers wiser men4 ,my experience in manufacturing the largest wrought iron guns which it is prudent to construct1 sufficiently proves the truth of these assertions4 ,harpoon gun-barrels1 one inch and a half in the bore1 having the metal at the breech end an inch and a quarter thick1 will stand a proof which invariably bursts a thicker barrel2 in fact1 all experience tends to show that light wrought iron or steel barrels are stronger than unusually heavy ones4 ,as all depends on the principle of condensing the fibres of the iron1 ceteris paribus1 the greater the condensation the greater the strength1 and the less the condensation the greater the weakness4 ,that this argument applies principally to solid forged guns ,i am ready to admit2 and that guns forged of hoops1 rings1 and bars1 in smaller sections1 are free from this objection1 ,i am also ready to admit4 ,these guns are1 however1 liable to objections equally fatal1 both as regards their enduring and projective powers1 as ,i shall presently show4 ,experience proves that brass guns are inferior1 both in sharpness of shooting and in range1 to cast-iron guns3 this is undoubtedly attributable to the greater softness of brass than of cast iron2 and for the same reason a wrought-iron gun1 though made as sound as one of cast iron1 would be inferior in these two important points4 ,but when a wrought-iron gun is composed of many particles imperfectly secured 7and no mechanical force is sufficient to secure perfect cohesion in large masses71 the wrought becomes doubly inferior to the cast gun3 a shot projected from such a gun starts from an unsound base2 a large portion of the explosive force is absorbed by the variety of sections composing the gun1 to the injury both of the accuracy and length of range of the projectile4 ,the softer metals cannot be beneficially used in the construction of large guns1 because they destroy the force of the expellant without making any equivalent return2 and the softer the metal and the greater its substance1 the more clearly is this important fact demonstrated4 ,thus1 in experiments made with large cannon for increasing the weight of the gun beyond a certain proportion to that of the projectile1 a gun of ten tons weight and ten inch bore would not exceed in range a gun of five tons1 if the charge of powder were the same2 on account of the indisputable fact that much more force of the expellant is destroyed1 whilst more than double the force is absorbed for the recoil of the ten ton than of the five ton gun2 and the loss from these two causes must materially affect the flight of the projectile1 though fired at exactly the same elevation4 ,the great defect which experiment shows to exist in the hoop-and-stave wrought iron gun1 and which renders the gun self-destroying1 is separation at points between the trunnions and cascable of the gun4 ,the force acting first upon the breech1 it yields1 and the force is then brought to bear upon the longitudinal portion of the gun behind the trunnions2 the staves have thus to bear the first strain1 and1 after a few shots1 become elongated4 ,an opening of the hoops at their junction with each other 7most frequently between the breech and trunnions7 begins1 after a very few shots1 to be distinctly visible1 and increases at every discharge1 until further proceeding amounts to madness1 or recklessness of human life4 ,that enormous engine1 ,mallet's monster mortar1 of which ,i give an engraving on page #ajj1 clearly proves this to be the case4 ,it will be observed to be constructed with a solid cast iron breech end1 the dimensions of which will be seen by referring to the engraving4 ,abutting upon this are a succession of wrought iron hoops1 ingeniously inserted into each other1 and more firmly secured by six outside staves of great dimensions1 which1 at the muzzle ring1 pass through openings in the muzzle ring1 with heads like enormous rivets4 ,the binding power is given by 8quoin-like0 wedges1 driven through the opposite end of the stave1 beneath the projection of the cast breech1 giving power to tighten the longitudinal binders by a blow when required4 ,illustration3 ,mallet's ,mortar4 ,,dimensions4 ,tons4 cwt4 qrs4 lbs4 ,cast iron base with wrought iron breech shrunk into bore #ba #ai #j #b ,wood carriage complete1 with wrought iron screw and spanner for elevating mortar #h #h #j #ad ,bottom part of mortar to fit on top of the breech #g #e #c #bc ,part of mortar 7a ring7 to fit on the top of the above #e #h #c #bc ,do4 do4 do4 #c #j #b #ac ,muzzle ring #a #b #c #ab ,wood ring #j #j #a #j ,wrought iron ring #j #d #c #d ,wrought iron conical ring to fix on top of muzzle ring #j #c #c #be ,t-headed bolts1 with gibs and keys for fixing mortar to base3 may be called outer staves #a #af #b #j ,wood-wedges1 c41 for elevating #j #ac #c #bb ,outer pin1 with cross for turning mortar round #j #h #c #ad ------------------ ,total weight #ej #ac #b #ba ,weight of shell unfilled1 #bf cwt4 #b qrs42 diameter1 #cf inches4 ,this is notorious as a monster failure1 even with a charge of powder amounting to only one half what the projector fondly hoped would be perfectly harmless in its effects4 ,this ,brobdignagian toy has proved to be fearfully expensive1 the cost having been estimated at eight thousand pounds4 ,it has1 ,i believe1 been the largest and most expensive experiment indulged in by the noble 8projector10#f and ,i sincerely hope it will be the last4 #f ,lord ,palmerston4 ,the preceding pages will have done much to remove from an unbiassed mind any favourable impression of the advantages expected to result from the use of wrought-iron cannon4 ,the knowledge of this subject1 even among talented and scientific men1 appears to be at a very low ebb1 as is evinced by the multitude of failures that have taken place2 not one success of any moment has as yet been attained1 and not a discovery has been made worthy of being chronicled4 99 99 99 99 99 ,having enlarged thus much on the qualities of a metal which it is certain can never supersede the use of cast-iron1 even though it be freed from the defects found practically to exist in our present constructed iron artillery2 and having also alluded to the fact that the form has much influence on the durability of cast-iron guns1 ,i now proceed to the more important point of the qualities of cast-iron itself4 ,little doubt exists that guns cast a hundred years ago were more durable than those of more recent formation2 it is evident1 therefore1 that apart from mere form1 some material depreciation must have taken place in the quality of the metal4 ,the use of hot blast-furnaces1 better fluxes1 and improved chemical knowledge in the reduction of metallic ores1 though highly profitable in a commercial point of view1 doubling the products of our mines1 and enriching their proprietors1 has1 unfortunately rendered ,english cast-iron perfectly unfit for the formation of cannon1 if increased range and greater strain by high elevation are to be the order of the day4 ,the durability of ,russian cast-iron is unquestionably greater than that manufactured in ,england4 ,some cause must exist for this2 and the question arises1 is the ore superior to ours1 or does the superiority of ,russian iron depend on their method of smelting8 ,the latter is1 we believe1 the cause of the superiority of ,russian iron2 for experiments show that ,russian ore1 smelted in an ,english furnace1 yields the same kind of cast-iron as is produced from the ore found in ,england4 ,the inference1 therefore1 is plain1 that the difference in the process of smelting makes all the difference in the quality of the iron4 ,two thousand years ago the ,romans1 or their dependents1 smelted iron in the county of ,durham3 vast accumulations of slag exist there at the present time2 and thousands of tons have been beneficially re-smelted by two adjoining iron-works1 and a percentage of iron obtained sufficient to prove that the ,romans were little indebted to fluxes or hot blasts for the quality of iron they obtained4 ,the ,russians cannot boast of these adjuncts any more than the ,romans3 the old agents1 wood and energy1 are alone employed in the smelting of their ores2 and in the absence of scientific aids1 though they obtain a much smaller aggregate quantity of metal1 yet it is undoubtedly of a much superior quality4 ,with the ,romans1 also1 the yield was meagre1 but the quality was good2 now1 however1 circumstances are reversed1 quantity1 not quality1 being the order of the day4 ,the use of coals instead of wood in the process of smelting has introduced a mixture which is very prejudicial4 ,most of the coal1 even from our very best mines1 contains a large quantity of pyrites1 or bisulphuret of iron1 which1 combining with the cast-iron1 injures it to an incalculable extent4 ,these facts fully explain why our cast-iron guns are not so good now as formerly4 ,select the most suitable mine in the kingdom1 erect a furnace on the most improved principles1 employ wood fuel only1 avoid fluxes and hot and cold blasts1 and be content with the small amount of metal produced1 and beyond all doubt the quality will be all that the most sanguine founder or artillerist could wish4 ,thus the inferiority of our cast-iron guns has been accounted for1 and a method suggested1 which1 if efficiently carried out1 would effect the desired improvement4 99 99 99 99 99 ,we are indebted to ,krupp for the first suggestion of1 as well as the first attempt to introduce1 a cast steel gun of greater durability and power than the best cast-iron gun which has yet been manufactured4 ,steel1 possessing1 as it does1 hardness to any desired extent1 ductility in an equal degree1 tenacity unrivalled1 and all the other requisites1 is destined to take the place of all other metals in the construction of artillery4 ,this metal waits only to be tested2 and the greater the extent to which the trial is carried1 the more confident we are that it will answer every purpose4 ,krupp1 like many other men with valuable ideas1 has been peculiarly unfortunate in his attempts to carry them out4 ,with a vast amount of knowledge of the science of metallurgy1 he wants more knowledge in the not inferior science of projectiles2 the most important point being to ascertain the form of gun calculated to be suitable for new metal1 of the use of which1 for cannon1 the world possesses no antecedent knowledge4 ,the only failures ,mr4 ,krupp has made 7if they can1 strictly speaking1 be so called71 have arisen from mal-construction1 imperfect form1 and unscientific combinations2 defects which might be expected from a mere novice1 though not from experienced artillerists or founders of artillery4 ,the trial of the only steel gun sent by ,mr4 ,krupp to this country1 was conducted in the most absurd manner1 and on wholly unscientific principles4 ,i will endeavour to convey some idea of this most extraordinary of experiments4 ,whether ,mr4 ,krupp was unacquainted with the durability of his metal1 or was persuaded1 against his will1 to conduct the experiment as he did1 ,i know not1 but the following is what took place3-- ,in #ahea ,mr4 ,krupp brought to ,woolwich a specimen steel gun of ten-inch bore1 weighing about four tons4 ,he was induced 7but why1 ,i am at a loss to conceive17 to construct a cast-iron jacket1 or outer gun1 into which his steel gun was inserted up to the trunnions4 ,the steel gun was separated from its cast-iron jacket by a space of half an inch in its whole length1 except at each end1 where the jacket was fitted to the gun with a moderate degree of tightness2 thus the gun and jacket consisted of two tubes1 one within the other1 fastened only at their extremities1 and that by a very slight force4 ,the result1 as might have been expected1 was the bursting both of the gun and its case2 but that the steel gun or its jacket would have stood the test1 if subjected to it singly1 cannot be doubted4 ,the difference of expansion between the steel gun and its jacket would be quite enough to account for its bursting4 ,had the contact of the two been perfect throughout the whole length1 but allowing half an inch all around for the expansion of the steel gun in that part which was subjected to the greatest pressure1 the very act of restraining it in other parts so as to prevent equal expansion1 would be perfectly certain to produce a fracture4 ,mr4 ,krupp's friends have complained loudly of unfair treatment1 whether justly or not1 no opinion need now be given2 but it is much to be regretted that his experiment was not carried out on scientific principles4 ,the introduction of cast steel guns will be the most essential improvement in artillery3 and an extensive series of experiments1 extending over many years1 during which time ,i have manufactured gun-barrels of steel alone1 ought to give my opinion some weight on this subject4 ,laminated steel gun-barrels were well known in #ahea2 but the ,english bugbear1 prejudice1 raised a clamour against them1 which was echoed by interest and ignorance1 and thus their general adoption was for a long time prevented4 ,however1 in the short space of seven years1 they have become universally adopted1 with the most beneficial results2 better shooting1 less annoyance from recoil1 less weight to carry1 and greater safety to the sportsman1 being the principal4 ,and so it will be with steel cannon2 as a short time will suffice to enable scientific investigation to remove all prejudices against them4 ,the external form of cannon is a question of vital importance1 but one which is little understood by artillerists of the present day4 ,whilst it is a demonstrable fact that all excessive bulk of cast-iron causes weakness in proportion to the excess1 no effectual steps have as yet been taken by the ,government to ascertain what is the due proportion of metal which ought to exist in different parts of the gun4 ,the ,american authority on naval gunnery1 ,captain ,dhalgren1 has paid considerable attention to this subject2 and if the reports on the durability of ,american heavy ordnance can be relied on 7and there is no reason why they should not7 his investigations have been attended with much success4 ,captain ,dhalgren has extended the principle acted upon many years ago by ,mr4 ,monck2 his great improvement consisting in lessening the weight of iron in front of the trunnions1 and adding to that of the breech4 ,in cannon1 as in fowling-pieces1 weight in the fore part is useless2 conducing neither to the safety of the gun1 nor to the smartness of its shooting4 ,for endurance1 it is necessary that the expansion should be equal in every part of the gun2 rigidity in one part increasing the strain on the immediately adjacent parts1 which1 if much reduced1 are thus rendered liable to fracture4 ,the breech has to endure the lengthened explosion produced by the burning of the gunpowder2 and1 as this continues until it has overcome the inertia of the projectile1 it is necessary in all cases that the maximum of strength should be in the breech of the gun4 ,when the projectile is once in motion the strength of the tube may be rapidly decreased2 the only strain it has to bear is exerted whilst the projectile is passing over it2 and this strain1 in properly constructed guns1 becomes of shorter and shorter duration as the projectile attains its highest velocity at the muzzle of the gun4 ,the greatest strain a gun has to bear near the muzzle is that produced by the condensation of the column of air in front of the charge2 and in almost every form of ,english ordnance the weight of metal here is greater than is necessary4 ,the ,russian guns which have been brought to this country present the same superabundance of metal at the muzzle1 whilst at the breech there appears to be a deficiency2 and when we take into consideration the extraordinary reports of their endurance1 we must ascribe it to some other cause than the proper distribution of metal4 ,their endurance is no doubt owing in part to the goodness of the metal1 in part also to the form of the breech1 to the uniformity of thickness in the sides of the arch1 and1 lastly1 to the absence of those protuberances called 8reinforce rings40 ,these rings might with propriety be termed 8rings of destruction20 for wherever irregularities exist in the substance of the metal1 there the waves of vibration are interrupted1 and the weak point then becomes fractured4 ,the science of spring-making in all its varieties demonstrates the truth of this statement4 ,leave on a coach-spring an abutment of metal like a 8reinforce ring10 and a few motions will be sufficient to break it1 however well the spring may be constructed in every other part4 ,the rigidity of this protuberance1 by interrupting the waves of vibration1 causes additional vibration in the adjacent and more yielding part1 and thus produces fracture4 ,the same thing occurs in all ill-constructed artillery3 where the vibrations are checked1 there is always a danger of some weaker part giving way4 ,but the laws which regulate the distribution of vibrations in metal substances are not yet understood by artillerists1 or cannon would be differently constructed4 ,those unscientific protuberances called 8trunnions10 which are to be seen in almost every description of gun1 prove the accuracy of my assertions4 ,these protuberances1 if scientifically considered1 would soon be discarded1 since they tend not only to the rapid destruction of the cannon1 but also exert a most injurious influence on the direction of the projectile4 ,the most wonderful shooting ever heard of 7and which has been before alluded to7 is partly to be attributed to the absence of trunnions4 ,trunnions act as the fulcrum of a scale-beam2 they allow the breech and muzzle of the gun to oscillate1 but in an opposite direction to a scale beam4 ,rifled cannon can never be correctly constructed whilst any weight impinges on the gun in front of the first starting point of the projectile2 they must have the fulcrum behind the point of discharge1 and the more nearly in a direct line the better4 ,rifled cannon will in some few years be perfectly constructed of cast steel2 the projectile being made of gun metal1 i4 e41 ninety-five parts of copper to five parts of tin1 or of lead and its alloys1 and at a probable cost of ten times that of a cast-iron projectile of equal weight4 ,rifled cannon must be elevated by raising the muzzle2 no depression of the breech must occur as by the usual elevating screw2 and the recoil must be received and borne by fastenings and axle in rear of the breech only4 ,trunnions and all impinging influences are incompatible with correctness of fire4 ,the muzzle must be raised in a similar manner to the raising of a hand rifle1 the recoil being thrown backwards1 in as direct a line as possible with that of the shot4 ,it is only on account of the difficulty of experimenting with rifled cannon that they are at all behind rifled muskets in point of perfection4 ,the ardent lover of science is appalled when an experiment costs hundreds of pounds4 ,we have not a ,general ,jacob everywhere who can afford to spend a thousand or two in experiments2 but1 nevertheless1 the lover of science1 could he experiment1 might attain such extraordinary accuracy of range1 as to blow up a smaller magazine than that of ,kurrachee at four times the distance2 and that1 too1 with a more certain effect1 though with a projectile heavier than several of ,jacob's rifles tied together4 ,correct direction is certain in proportion to the increase of weight2 deflection being in the minimum with the heavier weight1 from the well known law of momentum4 ,that astute and energetic sovereign1 the ,emperor ,napoleon1 is pursuing experiments with rifled cannon2 with what result there can be little doubt4 ,it must be by the use of rifled cannon that our artillery will regain the place it has lost4 ,a short time will suffice to make the disparity between our artillery and small arms as great as when we were content with the six-pounder field gun and old 8,brown ,bess40 ,ranges will only be ruled by sight1 and objects will be hit eventually with as much ease at #e1jjj yards as they now are at #a1jjj4 ,steel1 rifled cannon1 and projectiles of gun-metal will assuredly bring about as complete a revolution in artillery as the ,greenerian rifle and bullet have effected in small arms4 ,the form of gun best suited for all purposes has yet to be determined2 and we have pointed out these defects in our artillery with the hope that some of the great practical philosophers of the present age may devote themselves to the study of this question4 ,it is nearly allied to the science of bell-making1 and a few more fractures of ,big ,ben will extend our knowledge of the subject1 and produce a remedy which lies not very deep below the surface4 ,the laws which should guide us in the construction of cast steel guns1 so as to insure their durability1 are very analogous to those which determine the durability of bells2 for the laws which regulate disintegration of crystalline structures are very similar4 ,hitherto the rule of thumb has1 unfortunately1 been the only rule observed in measuring out the quantity of metal which shall surround that portion of a cannon which has to sustain the most violent concussion4 ,professor ,barlow many years ago proved1 to the satisfaction of the ,institution of ,civil ,engineers1 that the metal in any cylinder decreases in utility in proportion to the square of its distance from the centre3 that the outside of a gun of the form now used1 in fact1 is only one-ninth as useful as the inside2 being three times as far from the centre4 ,if we double the thickness1 the outside1 being five times as far from the centre as the inside1 will be but one-twenty-fifth as useful2 or in plain ,english1 nearly useless4 ,the reason of this is simple1 and ,i will endeavour to explain it4 8,a bar of cast iron one inch thick each way and #dj inches long will stretch about one-twentieth of an inch1 if a weight of about four tons be suspended by it4 ,when the weight is removed1 the cast iron nearly recovers its previous form1 and is uninjured2 but if it be stretched more1 by a greater weight1 it is permanently injured4 8,a bar of the same thickness1 but three times as long--#abj inches--will stretch three times as much1 or three-twentieths of an inch1 with the same weight2 or if only one-third the weight--one ton and a third--be suspended1 it will stretch one-twentieth of an inch1 the same as the shorter bar4 8,if we suspend #af tons by four bars1 one inch thick and #dj inches long1 they will each stretch one-twentieth of an inch only1 and remain uninjured2 but if we attempt to do so with two bars #dj inches long and two #abj inches long1 then1 when the whole have lengthened one-twentieth of an inch1 the short ones are exerting a force of eight tons1 but the long ones that of only two and two-thirds tons4 ,the weight1 therefore1 will still further lengthen the bars1 and permanently injure the short ones2 perhaps break them first1 and then the long ones4 8,this is the way a gun is burst4 ,the inside is a series of bars of iron1 say #dj inches long1 in the form of a ring2 the outside a series of rings1 representing the bars three times as long40 ,warfare1 since the first introduction of gunnery into ,europe1 has been like one continued series of experiments for testing the efficacy of our guns4 ,no description of gun we now possess can lay any claim to existence fifty years ago3 the great majority of our guns now in use are of a much more recent date4 ,with one or two exceptions1 no artillery has been constructed on any scientific theory2 some alteration has been made1 and if a gun of a certain form and dimensions gave a certain result1 then an extension or emulation of that gun was tried2 and if it succeeded a loud cry of exultation was raised1 and the discovery was announced to the world as a great improvement4 ,illustration3 ,russian #ef-pounder gun4 ,illustration3 #h-;inch ,british gun4 ,colonel ,prejudice has invented a vastly improved description of gun2 another guess is made1 and so different forms of guns are multiplied4 ,can there be a more striking illustration of this than the one which took place during the late ,crimean war8 ,it was boasted that the whole human race might be exterminated by the new invention2 but the 8,lancaster gun0 turned out to be most unscientific in its construction1 and most eccentric in its action4 ,had such a thing as scientific knowledge in gunnery existed among the artillerists of the day1 such a monstrosity would have been buried soon after its birth2 instead of being allowed to squander large sums of money at every discharge1 and then at last to become a 8,whistling ,jemmy0 for our bluejackets to laugh at4 ,the form of cannon no doubt exercises a vital influence over their durability2 bad form and imperfection of material combined1 tended to produce the rapid destruction of our guns during the late important struggle4 ,the gun which has been experimented with to the greatest extent1 and which has withstood all trials successfully1 is a ,russian fifty-six-pounder2 taken1 ,i believe1 at ,bomarsund4 ,in this gun there are two great peculiarities2 the shape1 as will be seen in the diagram1 differs from all our own guns3 it is a 8chambered gun10 and the metal is taken away from the outside precisely as the contraction increases on the inside thus giving an equal thickness of metal in every part1 of the arc 7see page #aad74 ,in contrast with this1 we give a cut of our #h-;inch gun1 which most nearly resembles it as a chambered gun 7see page #aad74 ,the reader's attention is especially directed to the dissimilarity in the distribution of the metal in the two guns4 ,the want of uniform thickness of metal in our #h-;inch gun must be sufficient to convince any one that1 if the ,russian gun be properly constructed1 the principle of ours must be radically wrong4 ,that such is the case1 indeed1 ,i cannot doubt1 the ,russian gun having undergone such a test as would have destroyed six of ours4 ,the gun has since been made two inches larger in the bore1 and even oval-bored1 for firing shells1 which should alone be enough to destroy it2 and yet with all this the gun remains perfect4 ,the gun which most nearly resembles this is our ,english carronade2 and that these guns have some important principle in their shape is proved by their great durability under all trials2 and ,i believe that the tests to which the carronade has been subjected have been more severe than that of any other piece in the ,british service4 ,there have been many shrewd conjectures as to the cause of this durability2 one of these was very pungent1 viz41 8the invention was not by one of the cloth40 ,an examination of the drawing of the #fh-pounder carronade will enable the reader to perceive the great similarity between this and the ,russian gun before spoken of 7see page #aad74 ,illustration3 #fh-pound carronade4 ,the manufacture of these guns was originally in the hands of the inventors1 and it is quite evident that they must have taken great pains with the form of the gun1 and also have taken special care that the material of which it was constructed was of the very best quality4 ,there is too much reason to doubt the proficiency of military men in the science of metallurgy2 and the ,british system of depending solely on their knowledge for the last half century1 has no doubt proved an obstacle to advancement in the science of gunnery4 ,illustration3 ,monck's #ef-pounder gun4 ,the gun which ranks next is ,monck's #ef-pounder4 ,although not a chambered gun1 it will be seen1 from the diagram 7see p4 #aag71 to be an attempt 7if not a perfectly successful one7 to obtain uniformity of thickness in every part of the arc4 ,the durability of these guns ranks as we have placed them4 ,the next in rotation is the #h-;inch or #fh-pounder 7see p4 #aad72 which1 although not the original sized gun that was rifled for the ,lancaster shell1 yet it was the one eventually used for that projectile up to the end of its very brief career4 ,illustration3 #aj-;inch or #hf-pounder gun4 ,the #aj-;inch gun of #ie cwt41 delineated at page #aag1 will be seen to be defective in its outlines when tested by the principles before laid down1 and the fact of more #aj-;inch guns bursting at ,sebastopol than any others 7mortars only excepted71 may be taken as exclusive evidence of its imperfection4 ,the bursting of mortars is quite notorious1 especially the #ac-;inch mortars used for sea-service in the attack on ,sweaborg4 ,a slight examination of the engraving of one will be sufficient to convince any person that1 if what has already been advanced on the form of guns can lay claim to being scientific1 then this is of all guns the most unscientific that was ever manufactured4 ,its durability1 too1 like its shape1 is of a very low order4 ,illustration3 #ac-;inch sea-service mortar4 ,the #ac-;inch land mortar depicted below is a much more serviceable production1 because it contains much less metal4 ,illustration3 #ac-;inch land-service mortar4 ,mortars will retain their place in spite of all improvements4 ,rifling is inapplicable to them4 ,their principal utility consists in obtaining a vertical fire2 the shell being pitched to a great height1 so as to fall into places that cannot be assailed by a horizontal fire4 ,the late ,joseph ,manton has the merit of being the first modern inventor of rifled cannon4 ,his idea was1 that if a motion on an axis parallel to the horizon could be given to cannon balls1 they would range farther and with greater accuracy4 ,as there exists great difficulty in causing the rifling in a gun to act upon an iron ball1 he constructed a cup of wood1 into which the ball was fitted1 projections being made upon the wood to fit into the groves of the rifle2 the spinning motion thus being communicated to the ball by its wooden adjunct4 ,the result was twofold2 for the expansions of the wood during the explosion1 filled the tube of the gun tight1 and effectually destroyed the windage4 ,the government of the day did offer him a premium of one farthing each2 but 8,joe0 over-reached himself1 asking the sum of #cj1jjj down2 this was refused1 and the patent was allowed to expire without the ,government taking any advantage of it1 and experiments ceased to be made in this direction4 ,rifled cannon have now1 however1 become a certainty4 ,mechanically speaking1 they are as easily to be produced as hand rifles4 ,the general application has1 however1 vast difficulties1 which must be overcome before their use can become general4 ,small arm projectiles suitable for rifles must of necessity be made of ductile metal1 and all the attempts previously made1 whether with brass or iron guns1 are alike useless4 ,the mass in motion1 even when of equal hardness with the gun 7as in the case of cast iron guns and cast iron shot71 invariably destroys that in a comparative state of rest2 and the rifling is obliterated after a very few discharges4 ,in a brass gun the destruction is certainly not so rapid1 on account of the different nature of the metal2 yet the destruction of the gun for all useful purposes is equally effectual4 ,it is evident1 then1 that success cannot be obtained by using the present materials in rifled cannon2 and the question inevitably arises1 what better material can we use8 ,wrought iron shells have already been thoroughly tried in the ,lancaster oval gun1 with a well-known result4 ,great hopes were at one time entertained1 that something suitable would result from ,mr4 ,bessemer's discovery of the combustion of carbon1 and that an iron of sufficient ductility1 yet without the usual hardness1 would be produced2 but this1 it appears1 is still a myth4 ,extent of range and accuracy of fire in gunnery will in future be of so much importance in war1 that it is not extravagant to assert1 that in contests between well-matched belligerents1 the precious metals 7if they gave any advantage to the user7 would be unhesitatingly used in projectiles4 ,but on the score of economy1 science need not be impeded4 ,gun-metal projectiles and cast steel cannon would work as effectually together as lead and iron in small arms4 ,some other mixtures less expensive might be produced 7lead and copper in certain proportions are very ductile71 and at the same time sufficiently strong to resist all tendency to squash2 as the softer metals would inevitably do4 ,the more ductile metals are limited in their utility1 by the same law which limits the use of pure lead3 that is1 to given weight1 height of column1 or velocity4 ,great doubt exists whether a bullet made of gun metal1 and of the same proportionate dimensions and form as an ,enfield bullet1 but fitted for a ten-inch gun1 would not1 if fired with the proportionate charge of powder 7namely1 seventeen pounds71 be as completely squashed1 or driven in upon itself1 as the ,enfield bullet if fired with the old ,brown ,bess charge of four drachms and a half4 ,considerable time and experience will be required to ascertain the proportions of metallic mixture necessary to meet all contingencies2 this1 however1 is a matter of detail1 and must extend over so large an area1 that it can be handled only by the government officials1 with the necessary 8sinews0 of experiment4 ,nevertheless it must be undertaken2 and the sooner it is done the better1 for the prestige of that nation which would lead the van of improvement in gunnery1 and increase its power of attack and defence beyond those of its rivals4 ,rifled cannon is a generic term of endless application1 presenting to the mind modifications of projectiles in endless variety1 ranging from the 8light firebrand0 to the twice deadly rocket3 not rockets of that eccentric and erratic character by which ,congreve made an undying name2 but real bon fide rifle rockets1 which shall hit the dead-lights in the quarter-gallery of a frigate1 carry away the halyards of your enemies' ensign 7making him drop his colours at the first shot7 or dash the glass from the hand of the pilot4 ,all such imaginary feats will yet be accomplished2 though the reader may smile at the idea4 ,my experience with rockets goes to justify me in asserting that rockets discharged from a gun1 under certain circumstances1 can be as effectually controlled1 and kept to a direct course1 as a bullet fired from a rifle4 ,the rocket1 however1 may be fired a much greater distance than we have ever been able to project a bullet2 because1 in addition to the force which projects it from the gun1 its flight is maintained by the self sustaining agency in the body of the rocket4 ,rockets require a much smaller charge of powder to project them than that which is used for a bullet2 a rocket started by its own force1 expends1 in acquiring even an approximation to its highest velocity1 at least one-third of the force with which it is charged2 but when projected by a small charge of gunpowder this force is saved1 and the flight of the rocket is afterwards sustained by the force with which it is charged4 ,firing rockets from cannon can only be practised under certain circumstances4 ,the observations already made on the granulation of gunpowder will have prepared the reader for this announcement4 ,when fired from a cannon under the old rgime1 the rocket was projected at high velocity1 and the case of the rocket was destroyed by the very force which set it in motion4 ,a rocket suitable for artillery should be cast of gun metal1 with a frame of considerable strength4 ,in form it should nearly approximate to an expansive bullet2 but1 instead of the limited length of one and three quarters diameter2 it should approach to four diameters2 two of which1 at least1 should be appropriated to the cylinder behind the head4 ,the head is charged with composition more densely driven than is customary in the ordinary rocket2 the tubes in the cylinder are also charged with a composition equally dense4 ,the outer frame of the rocket is cast with suitable projections to fit the grooves of the gun3 the spiral of these grooves is considerable1 being one turn in every three feet1 in order to impart to the rocket an effectual spinning motion when in a low state of velocity4 ,the rocket properly constructed is then placed in the rocket-gun1 and fired in the usual way2 but it is essential that the gunpowder used should be of a suitable quality3 its combustion must be as slow as possible1 a starting velocity of from #ejj to #hjj feet per second being sufficient to ensure the flight of the self-sustaining projectile to the end of its range4 ,this principle may be extended from a light firebrand1 as already stated1 to that of a rocket charged in the head with the most deadly and destructive fulminate4 ,it may appear absurd to speak of fulminates being projected2 since all experiments show that fulminates1 even when adulterated1 will not stand the concussion of a discharge1 but invariably ignite in the gun1 however carefully placed or packed in the shell which contains them3 for this reason fulminates have never been successfully used4 ,but if the fulminate is placed in the head of a rocket1 this objection may be obviated4 ,the gradual manner in which velocity is given to a rocket does not subject it to violent displacement during its flight2 neither need the concussion in the gun be severe1 owing to the nature of the gunpowder used1 which in its gradual expansion is analogous to steam3 thus the field for the application of fulminates is opened to an unlimited extent4 ,my own experience on this subject has been limited to its application for the saving of life from shipwreck1 where the application of a line to the rocket limits its range and velocity2 but sufficient is left in a rocket of an inch and a half diameter effectually to carry out a line of a quarter of an inch diameter to a distance of #fjj or #hjj yards3 that is1 more than double the distance obtained by either ,manby's apparatus or the rockets now in use2 which1 lamentable to state1 are quite inadequate to the purposes for which they are intended4 ,though the improvements in rifled cannon are at present only in their infancy1 they have nevertheless attained to an extraordinary degree of perfection1 verifying all our predictions to the letter4 ,a writer in the ,times makes the following statements in favour of ,mr4 ,whitworth's improvements3-- 8,while some men of really inventive talent1 and a great many charlatans1 have been permitted to waste the public money in trying vainly to improve our artillery1 it seems passing strange that it should not long ago have been discovered how impossible it was to hope for successful results in the direction in which they were working4 ,it was clear that while increased range and precision of firing were wanted1 it was nearly as important to bring the charges of ammunition and the weight of metal in guns into more manageable proportions to each other1 and to the facilities for transit on active service4 ,no sensible man can have witnessed the frightful damage done to the efficiency of our army in the ,crimea by the exigencies of the siege-train during the winter of #ahed-e without being impressed with this conviction4 ,the principle of the rifle offered an obvious suggestion for the proper means of working out the foregoing problem2 but then for artillery1 rifling by grooves would not do without the use of a pliant metal in the projectile1 and the cost of lead rendered its application to that purpose impracticable4 ,it was necessary1 therefore1 to alter the existing mode of rifling1 and to modify the bore of the cannon1 so that an iron projectile could be discharged from it1 rotating on its own axis in the line of flight4 ,this result once secured1 it is obvious that a field-piece or gun of position would become a rifle on a large scale1 and that the same immense increase of range and of penetration which had been realised by the smaller weapon as compared with ,brown ,bess1 would be placed at the command of the artillery service4 ,it is consolatory1 after a series of failures worthy even of ,brunel in launching the ,leviathan1 that the country has at last the well-grounded hope of an improvement by which our ordnance may be placed on a proper footing4 ,in pursuing those careful experiments which he undertook for the ,government1 principally to improve the rifle1 ,mr4 ,whitworth1 the eminent machinist1 adopted a polygonal spiral bore of a uniform pitch1 but more rapid than could be attained by grooves4 ,this bore has enabled him to surpass immensely the range and penetration of the ,enfield rifle2 but even these advantages1 important as they are1 scarcely surpass those which it places within the reach of our artillery service4 ,the strain of the projectile being distributed evenly over every side of the polygon1 iron can be substituted for lead in the projectile1 and this simple but beautiful mechanical appliance at once becomes available for cannon40 ,the powerful aid of the ,times is 8almost success20 though in this instance it has signally failed1 the boasted accuracy there spoken of not having been yet obtained4 ,this has no doubt arisen in part from the fact that ,mr4 ,whitworth's great mechanical knowledge would not suffice to make him au fait at the compound science of gunnery4 ,his 8polygonal spiral bore of uniform pitch1 more rapid than could be obtained by grooves10 is after all only an experimental gun1 not sufficiently developed as yet for practical utility4 ,still1 the writer already alluded to has favoured us with the following remarks in the ,times3 8,moreover1 ,mr4 ,whitworth has discovered in the course of his experiments1 that according to the quickness of the turn in the polygon is the length of the projectile that may be fired2 so that #bd lb4 and #dh lb4 shot have been sent to extraordinary ranges with half the usual charge of powder1 from an ordinary #ab-pounder howitzer4 ,here1 then1 is at once the solution of the whole question which has troubled the brains of so many inventors1 real or pretended1 for years4 ,the artilleryman at one stride resumes the relative position to the soldier of the line which the ,enfield rifle had so perilously deprived him of1 and this mechanical country1 after finding herself on the level of ,france1 ,russia1 and other ,european ,states1 is once more1 as during the ,peninsular campaigns1 enabled to assert her natural superiority in the manufacture of cannon4 ,we trust that no petty jealousies on the part of narrow-minded officials will be allowed to interfere with the course of ,mr4 ,whitworth's experiments1 and that the encouragement which he is now receiving from the ,minister at ,war and the ,commander-in-,chief will enable him1 at no remote date1 to realise for the benefit of the army and the nation that revolution in gunnery which the results already obtained by him promise40 ,report says that #be1jjjl4 is the amount of encouragement ,mr4 ,whitworth has received from the ,minister of ,war and the ,commander-in-,chief2 an adequate sum with which to conduct such an experiment1 but not sufficient to insure success4 ,of the success of ,mr4 ,whitworth's polygonal projectile1 on a large scale1 none need speculate1 for the principle is self-destructive4 ,lancaster's oval shell1 oscillated in its flight1 took a flight so extraordinary1 on account of the resistance of the atmosphere on the protuberances of the oval1 that the principle may be regarded as fully established that enlarged projectiles must be smooth and free from projections that 8saw the air10 otherwise range and accuracy of fire will be sacrificed4 ,the principle of ,mr4 ,whitworth's polygonal bore is fully discussed in its proper place1 and will here receive only a passing notice4 ,to ,mr4 ,w4 ,g4 ,armstrong1 of ,newcastle-upon-,tyne1 much more credit is due than can be claimed for ,mr4 ,whitworth4 ,long before the paid efforts of ,mr4 ,whitworth1 ,mr4 ,armstrong had made the subject of rifled cannon a special study1 and the success of his investigations has been such as to couple his name with those of the earliest inventors of effectual rifled cannon4 ,mr4 ,armstrong may also lay claim to being an originator of wrought steel cannon2 though here his name stands second as an inventor1 for to ,mr4 ,krupp is due the honour of first introducing cast steel cannon to the notice of our ,government4 ,mr4 ,armstrong tells his own tale so well in the columns of the ,times that we cannot do better than quote it3-- 8,in the latter part of #ahed1 ,i submitted to the ,duke of ,newcastle1 then ,minister at ,war1 a proposal for a gun which ,i anticipated would possess great superiority over the common forms of light artillery1 and ,i undertook1 with his ,grace's authority1 to construct a field-piece in conformity with the plan ,i had suggested4 ,the gun was accordingly soon afterwards made1 and has since1 during a period of nearly two years1 been the subject of numerous experiments1 partly upon the ordnance firing-ground at ,shoeburyness2 but principally under my own direction in this neighbourhood4 8,i have hitherto avoided publicity in reference to these experiments1 but1 as matured results of much interest and importance have now been arrived at1 and as other names are already before the public in connection with gun experiments made during the same period1 ,i feel that ,i may now1 without impropriety1 give some information on the subject4 8,with a view to strength and durability1 the gun is composed internally of steel and externally of wrought iron1 applied in a twisted or spiral form1 as in a musket or fowling-piece4 ,the bore is nearly two inches in diameter1 and is rifled4 ,the projectile is a pointed cylinder #f-a_/b inches long1 and its weight is #e lb4 ,it is made of cast iron1 coated with lead1 and is fired from the gun with a charge of #aj ounces of powder2 it contains a small cavity in the centre1 and may be used either as a shot or a shell4 ,when applied as a shell1 the cavity is filled with powder1 and a detonating fuse is inserted in front1 so as to fire the powder in the centre on striking an object4 ,when used as a shot1 the powder is omitted1 and an iron point1 which favours penetration1 is substituted for the fuse4 ,the gun is constructed to load at the breech1 the object being not only to obviate the disadvantages of sponging and loading from the front1 but also to allow the projectile to be larger in diameter than would enter at the muzzle1 and thus to insure its taking the impress of the grooves and completely filling the bore4 ,the piece weighs #e cwt41 and is mounted upon a carriage which bears a general resemblance to that of an ordinary #f-pounder field gun1 but which embraces a pivot frame and recoil slide4 ,a screw is also applied1 not only for elevating and depressing the gun1 but also for moving it horizontally1 by which means great delicacy of aim is effected4 ,the recoil slide has an upward inclination1 which enables the gun1 after running back1 to recover its position by gravity2 and its use is to relieve the pivot-frame and adjusting screws from injurious concussion4 8,i shall now give some particulars of the experiments recently made with this gun on the coast of ,northumberland1 near the village of ,whitley1 under the official inspection of ,colonel ,wilmot4 8,fourteen shots were in the first instance fired from a distance of #a1ejj yards at a timber butt1 #e ft4 wide #g-a_/b ft4 high4 ,six of these were expended in finding the elevation proper for the distance1 but after that was determined every succeeding shot hit the object without previous graze4 ,the final elevation of the gun was #d deg4 #bf min41 and the mean lateral distance of the shot-marks from a vertical line through the centre of the butt was only #aa-a_/b in4 8,persons who are conversant with artillery practice will be able to appreciate the accuracy of this firing2 but1 for the information of those who are unacquainted with the subject1 ,i may state that the ordinary #f-pounder field-piece1 which in point of weight forms the nearest approach to the present gun1 is perfectly useless at a distance of #a1ejj yards1 and is very uncertain even at #a1jjj yards4 ,it is only1 therefore1 with heavy artillery that a comparison can be drawn2 and it will be sufficient to state that in tabulating the practice made with such ordnance the deflections are invariably recorded in yards1 whereas with this rifled gun they can only be properly given in inches4 8,with respect to penetration1 the following particulars will be regarded as equally remarkable1 considering the small weight of the shot and the length of the range4 ,the butt was #c ft4 thick1 and was composed of six layers of rock elm bolted together1 so as to form a solid block4 ,one shot passed entirely through2 another struck near the edge and glanced2 and the remaining six penetrated within a few inches of the opposite side4 8,shell firing was next tried at a distance of #a1ejj yards2 the gun being fired at the same elevation and with the same charge as in the previous practice at the butt4 8,in this case two targets were erected1 one behind the other1 so as to appear as one object when viewed from the gun1 and a space of #cj feet was left between them4 ,the front target was intended to exhibit the perforations of the shell before bursting1 and the back one to show the effect of the fragments resulting from explosion4 8,after some preliminary experiments twenty-two shells were fired at the front target1 and of these only one missed the object of aim4 ,the following are the particulars3--,seventeen hit the first target direct1 and burst behind it1 the fragments penetrating the second one2 three grazed and burst immediately in front of the first target1 and perforated both with the pieces2 one hit the bottom of the first target and exploded in the ground1 and the remaining one missed entirely and burst on some rocks nearly on line beyond4 ,a strong side wind was blowing at the time1 and accounted for the deviation of this single shell4 8,four shells and three shots were then fired at an elevation of #f degrees1 from a distance of #b1jjj1 or1 more accurately1 #a1ifd yards4 ,all these struck within the breadth of the target2 but the elevation being scarcely sufficient1 they all fell a little short1 except one shell1 which1 ranging somewhat further than the others1 hit the target and burst as usual4 8,the results of this shell-firing were as follows3--,the front target contained #ea holes1 and the back one #afd1 while the ground between and adjacent to the targets exhibited about #gj perforations by fragments of shells1 the greater portion of which were afterwards recovered by digging4 8,with respect to ranges exceeding #b1jjj yards1 ,i may state that on previous occasions the gun had been tried up to #c1jjj yards--a distance which was reached with an elevation of #aa deg41 and the usual charge of #aj ounces of powder1 or #a-hth the weight of the projectile4 ,by augmenting the charge the range is increased1 but the accuracy is impaired2 and ,i therefore adhere to the #aj-ounce charge1 which gives ample penetration1 as the experiments at the butt will testify4 ,i may also observe that the ranges obtained with this charge bear a favourable comparison with those of the heaviest round-shot guns fired with a much larger proportion of powder4 8,it is a curious fact1 and one which greatly increases the efficiency of the shells1 that owing to the bursting charge requiring a minute space of time to mature its ignition after the firing of the fuse by impact1 the shell is enabled to travel four or five feet after striking an object before disruption takes place4 ,hence1 therefore1 it acts as a shot before it bursts as a shell4 ,when it perforates a target the explosion may be seen to take place at a few feet beyond1 and when it grazes it has time to rise1 and may be observed to burst after clearing the ground4 ,if1 therefore1 it were fired against a ship1 it would first penetrate the side in its entirety1 and then1 bursting1 traverse the deck in fragments2 or if directed against troops1 it would pierce the front line as a bullet1 and operate like grape-shot beyond4 ,the shells explode with equal certainty whether the first substance struck be hard or soft2 and1 in fact1 they even burst on the surface of water1 provided the elevation of the gun be not too great4 ,the bursting charge is very small1 but it suffices to break the shell into about #cj pieces1 which pursue their forward course without too much dispersion4 8,it is impossible to contemplate the results obtained with this gun without being impressed with the important part it is calculated to perform in warfare4 ,opposed to any ordinary field-piece1 it would be like the ,greener rifle against the old musket2 and no gun could be worked at an embrasure if a fire of shells were directed against it by one of these rifled pieces placed within the distance of a mile4 ,in naval operations1 also1 guns of this description1 but of larger size1 might apparently be applied with great effect--more especially as a system of breech loading1 combined with a self-recovering recoil action1 would be peculiarly advantageous in firing from portholes4 ,even light #e-pounders1 sending their shells from great distances through the sides of a ship and sweeping the decks with fragments of lead and iron1 would produce very destructive effects2 and a small swift steamer carrying a few such guns might prove a very troublesome opponent to a large ship of war4 ,but if the dimensions of the gun were increased so as to adapt it for shells of #bj lb4 or #cj lb41 still more terrible injury could be inflicted at greater distances2 and the ponderous artillery now used at sea would be of little service when opposed to the accurate and long-range firing of such rifled shell-guns40 ,since the publication of these remarks1 rifled artillery of ,mr4 ,armstrong's production has1 we believe1 been extensively tried4 ,the results of these trials have been most extraordinary2 and the principle is1 we believe1 identical with the expansive principle bearing my cognomen3 an extension of the principle of the ,greener and ,enfield rifle1 hereafter to be described4 ,i have had the honour of being consulted both by ,english and foreign authorities1 and ,i have assisted in constructing rifled artillery for several years2 and the experience thus obtained justifies me in making known to the world some of my observations on this subject4 ,rifled cannon with elongated projectiles1 similar in shape and principle to the ,greenerian bullet1 give1 with charges inferior to those of the old rgime and calibre1 more than double the range1 with ten times greater accuracy4 ,now1 either of these points1 if gained1 would be most important improvements1 and when combined would produce the most extraordinary results4 ,but this is not all3 a great diminution in the weight of the gun might also be effected2 and these advantages may be still further extended when we have had time to increase our knowledge of the valuable materials with which we are only just now becoming acquainted4 ,the following table will show the advantages to be gained both in length and accuracy of range4 ,before reverting to the table1 it may be necessary to remind the reader that the great reduction in the weight of guns arises from the adoption of the elongated projectile4 ,for example3 the diameter of the elongated projectile for an 8#ah-pounder0 is much less than the diameter of the gun for the spherical #ah-pounder2 thus allowing the thickness of metal to be equal in both guns4 ,the gun for the elongated projectile may be greatly reduced in weight without at all diminishing its strength1 simply on account of the great diminution in the diameter of the arc4 ,there is another important fact1 which ,mr4 ,whitworth1 with all his boasting1 has carefully concealed3 viz41 that a much greater pressure is exerted upon the square inch in the lesser than in the larger diameter of bore2 and to conceal this fact1 whilst claiming merit for a bullet of #ej-;gauge exceeding in range one of #be-;gauge1 the charge of gunpowder being alike in both cases1 appears very like deception4 ,any engineer will tell us that the pressure in the lesser is twice as great as in the larger bore2 and this explains why greater velocity is given to the projectile4 ,with these explanations the reader will be better prepared to weigh carefully my observations4 ,my task would1 doubtless1 have been rendered more easy1 if a clear elucidation of the principles of the expansive bullet could have been given thus early in the work2 but it is thought better to do this in its proper place4 ,i will only add here1 that although two bullets1 one elongated1 the other spherical1 and of equal diameter1 meet with the same amount of atmospheric resistance1 yet the one containing twice as much matter as the other retains its medium velocity nearly double the distance4 ,with these explanatory remarks ,i give the following table3-- ---------------------------------------- ---------------------- ,present ,range,present,reduced ,weight,range when of ,guns4 ,weight4when ,rifled4 ,rifled4 ---------------------------------------- ---------------------- #f-pndr4 #a1ejj yds4 #ag #ab cwts4 #c1jjj yds4 #i-pndr4 #a1fjj #bf #ah #d1jjj #ab-pndr4 #a1gjj #cd #bb #d1ejj #ah-pndr4 #a1ghj #db #bi #e1jjj #bd-pndr4 #a1hej #ej #cd #e1ejj #cb-pndr4 #b1jjj #fc #db #f1jjj #dh-pndr4 #b1ejj #gj #de #f1ejj #ef-pndr4 #e1jjj #he #fj #h1jjj #fh-pndr4 or #h-;in4 #d1ejj #he #fj #h1jjj #hf-pndr4 or #aj-;in4 #d1gjj #ie #fe #i1jjj ---------------------------------------- ---------------------- ,the reader must understand that all the guns given in this table were not rifled1 and that they have not all been subjected to trial4 ,the #f1 #ab1 #ah1 #bd1 and #dh-pounders have been tried1 with the results given above2 but the heavier guns have not as yet been tested3 the ranges and weights given in the table have1 however1 been derived from the results yielded in the trial of the lesser guns1 and may be safely relied on as scientific data2 being1 in truth1 rather under than over the mark4 ,all experiments clearly establish one very important principle1 long known to those acquainted with the science of projectiles1 viz41 8,that the heavier the projectile1 the less the deflection40 ,thus it is quite possible that the longest ranges may ultimately be obtained without any perceptible deflection4 ,and when we observe that the deflection of an ordinary #cb-shot in a range of #b1jjj yards1 is #ej feet1 and in #b1ejj yards1 #hj feet1 whilst the elongated shot1 at a much greater distance1 is not deflected half as many inches1 ,i think we may fairly say that our knowledge of gunnery is yet in its infancy4 ,fulminating powder may be used as an auxiliary in shells for various important purposes2 such1 for instance1 as destroying an entire fleet2 and it is clearly within the range of possibility that by its agency the largest ship may be destroyed by a single shot4 ,the accuracy of rifled cannon renders it an easy task to strike a plank only one inch above the water line1 and the penetration of an elongated gun-metal or lead-alloyed shell would enable us to reach the innermost parts of the magazine3 for it is scarcely possible to produce even an iron casing which shall resist the power of such projectiles4 ,it is possible1 therefore1 that we may see the noblest fleet destroyed in a few minutes by the agency of such projectiles4 ,i will endeavour to give an outline of the method by which this may be effected4 ,a long rifled cannon1 constructed for an elongated gun-metal shell2 of from fifty-six to eighty-six pounds1 and with an extreme range of from #f1jjj to #g1jjj yards1 may be considered to be a suitable instrument4 ,this shell should be charged in the head with a given quantity of the fulminate1 such as would be most calculated to prevent the tendency to explode from the concussion produced by the discharge of the gun4 ,it will be necessary to place the fulminate in thin layers between sheets of prepared caoutchouc1 or some other preparation of ,india-rubber2 having thus arranged the fulminate in the head of the shell and secured it there1 the usual method of filling the remainder is resorted to1 and the aperture is securely screwed up3 fuses not being necessary in this arrangement4 ,the difficulty in using this shell is to prevent its explosion when the gun is discharged2 and to obviate this all our engineering skill is required4 ,time and experience will show that1 by a modification of the propelling agent1 the shell may be started from a rifled cannon at a very low velocity2 the velocity being increased like that of the rocket4 ,this is to be done by modifying the arrangement of the gunpowder so as to ensure the shell acquiring its greatest velocity as it leaves the muzzle of the cannon4 ,the result of this has been already shown4 ,on the shell striking any object1 such as the ship's side1 the metal of the shell is driven in upon itself1 and an explosion of the fulminate follows as a natural consequence4 ,experiment has proved that shells exploding as they strike the ship's sides1 produce very little damage beyond making a hole in the ship the size of the shell4 ,this1 no doubt1 arises from the short space of time occupied by the shell in passing through the side of the ship2 all its force being exerted in the interior instead of on the sides of the vessel4 ,all shells of the nature alluded to would1 at certain distances1 take such a line of flight as to ensure them dipping towards the centre of gravity1 and thus exploding the magazines1 however deep below the water-line2 and when we consider the destructive effects of fulminates1 we think it quite within the range of probability that they might produce all the effects we have spoken of4 ,there are many agents equally powerful to be introduced into destructive warfare2 and with the advantages to be derived from improvements in rifled shells1 which the ingenuity of the present race will certainly effect1 he would be a rash man who would set any limits to the advancement of projectile science4 ,the great difficulty in the use of fulminates will be surmounted if these suggestions can be carried out2 and experiment is all that will then be necessary to establish the line of proceeding4 ,to effect this is the province of the ,government of the country2 to wait for it to be perfected by individual skill and enterprise would be unjust to science1 and injurious to the best interests of the nation4 ,the needful expenditure can only be borne by the nation1 and should be entered upon1 in order to effect improvement in projectiles1 with the view of maintaining our land and marine artillery at the highest point of efficiency4 ,there is one question of great importance to inventors1 and to which ,i have paid much attention1 namely1 the obtaining a spiral motion in a projectile which has been fired from a smooth bored gun4 ,all we have witnessed goes far to prove that the attainment of this is impossible1 in consequence of a principle not hitherto investigated by inventors4 ,if the course of a projectile is changed from the straight to the spiral1 it can only be done at the expense of range2 and that for the following reasons3 first1 the force which is necessary to induce this spiral movement must be exerted at the expense of the force which propels it forward2 secondly1 when this spiral movement is acquired1 it is so much in excess of the direct movement1 that after advancing a certain distance it falls to the ground4 ,a very simple experiment will prove this4 ,take an ordinary tin tube1 cut a bullet of an elongated form--cylindro-conical if wished--having grooves from the point backwards1 with the degree of spiral necessary to effect the object in view4 ,let the bullet be made of cork or light wood1 such as can be projected by a blast from the mouth1 and the result will be that the projectile will go one-half the distance before the friction of the atmosphere produces a motion on its axis parallel to its line of flight2 from this point it gradually loses its velocity in a forward direction1 it spins until its force is expended1 and then falls vertically to the ground4 ,to find the sequel1 try the same experiment without grooving1 and the range1 with the same force1 will be found to be double4 ,some years ago ,i witnessed such a trial with a #cb-pounder2 and1 to the astonishment of all present1 the bullet rose above the horizontal line1 and then fell to the ground1 like the cork bullet of which we have already spoken4 ,the endeavour to produce breech-loading cannon is an effort to obtain uncalled-for and superfluous facility in gunnery2 and if a perfect breech-loading cannon could possibly be produced1 what would it avail8 ,what superior property could it possess over the solid gun8 ,it could not be safety2 for when we consider the very limited number of explosions by which the very best guns are destroyed1 it can scarcely be possible for a gun composed of many parts to endure the intense vibrations to which large cannon are subjected4 ,the regular distribution of vibrations in the metal of the gun is the great point to be attended to in the construction of artillery2 so that vibrations may not be incorrectly induced by malformation1 or by an excess or deficiency of metal at any particular point2 for where the waves of vibration are checked by an unequal distribution of metal1 or other causes1 there the weak point in a gun is always found1 as all fractured guns clearly demonstrate4 ,an intimate acquaintance with the metallurgy of cannon1 enables me to give an almost unerring opinion as to the causes leading to the fracture4 ,most undoubtedly1 vibration1 if judiciously distributed1 is the soul of endurance2 but if injudiciously distributed is certain to result in the destruction of the cannon4 ,in structures composed necessarily of many joints1 obstruction to the waves of vibration must occur2 the different parts do not expand and vibrate equally2 a kind of revulsion is induced2 part repels part1 and destruction ensues as a natural consequence4 ,under no circumstances1 therefore1 can a breech-loader be as safe as a solid gun4 ,the facility with which breech-loaders can be charged is generally trumpeted forth to the world as an advantage of vital importance2 but let us carefully examine this point and see if it has not been exaggerated--whether1 in fact1 a solid gun cannot be charged and discharged as rapidly as a breech-loader4 ,in the first place1 all guns recoil2 this necessitates the relaying of the gun after every discharge1 in order to obtain accuracy of aim2 and if facility of loading is to be obtained at the expense of aim1 it can scarcely be called an advantage4 ,aim consumes more time than loading4 ,a six-pounder may be loaded and fired six times in the first minute2 but it would be impossible to do this and re-lay the gun after each shot4 ,where then is the advantage of firing six shots per minute if you cannot hit six objects8 ,and if breech-loaders could be fired sixty times per minute1 what would they avail if aim was wanting8 ,the raising or depressing of the breech of a gun by means of the elevating screw2 slewing to the right or left1 spunging the gun1 and ramming home the powder and shot1 all consume time2 hence we think that quickness of loading is worthless4 ,breech-loading cannon cannot be constructed for bullets of larger diameter than that of the rifle bore1 without a ductile bullet be used2 for1 as is usual in breech-loading small-arms1 the bullet rifles itself as it is forced up the grooves4 ,the projectiles for rifled cannon have hitherto been cast with corresponding grooves and lands to fit the internal form of the cannon4 ,a compound shot1 composed of iron1 and covered externally with ductile metal1 has been tried in a few instances2 but1 unfortunately1 the difficulty of combining two metals so dissimilar as iron and lead has been found so great as invariably to end in a failure2 therefore no prospect exists of bringing into play this1 the best point existing in breech-loading arms4 ,lastly1 the tendency of all guns to absorb the heat1 developed during explosion1 puts a limit to all extreme rapidity of fire2 even if this was not already limited by the more essential point of taking aim4 ,at ,sweaborg it was found necessary to allow an interval of five minutes between each discharge of a mortar1 and yet the whole of them burst after an average of #abj shots4 ,time and ingenuity spent in planning and constructing breech-loading cannon will always end in disappointment and failure4 ,many are the plans extant1 evincing great skill1 perseverance1 and everything needful in point of mechanical experience1 but betraying a total ignorance of the metallurgic science and of practical results from the use of the engine4 ,the study of these points will save money1 time1 and what is of more value1 brain-work1 which might be better employed4 ,striving to produce perfect breech-loading cannon is like striving to square the circle4 ,,chapter ,,iv4 ,,on ,,the ,,manufacture ,,of ,,iron ,,for ,,gun ,,barrels4 ,a considerable progress in improvement has taken place in manufacturing the higher quality of iron since my last publication4 ,not that ,i arrogate to myself any credit on that score1 but it is evident that good frequently comes of flagellations1 whether on the body or the mind4 ,one part of human nature will ever fear the exposure of bad qualities1 while another is emboldened to advance in improvement if the slightest chance exist of success or encouragement4 ,thus we often see men striving to produce one invention on the back of another1 with wonderful perseverance1 finding many blanks and rarely a prize2 for truly in this competing age1 the mind must be strong that can fight long4 ,bitter is the disappointment of the truly ingenious mind1 to see the produce of his brains thrown as lumber into the herring barrel1--as the printer terms the receptacle for what he sets no value upon2 while the valueless contrivances of the mean and sordid are preferred and rewarded1 because they enable the manufacturer to produce cheaper1 by foisting on the public a deceptive or a spurious article4 ,all inventions for purposes of deception1 are readily1 aye1 eagerly1 patronised2 for they return gold to the coffers sooner4 ,the improvement in the manufacture of gun-barrels depends on the quality of the iron entirely2 for it would be a useless waste of time to endeavour to make a good barrel of inferior metal4 ,science and experience have worked a wonderful change in the mixture of the superior qualities of iron3 we have had announcements of silver-steel barrels at ten guineas a pair in the rough1 of ,brescian steel barrels1 carbonised iron1 and ,i know not how many more descriptions or compounds of metals1 to form the best material for high-priced barrels4 ,we have now metal which1 in the rod1 cannot be sold for less than one shilling and twopence per pound3 the iron for a pair of barrels thus costing sixteen shillings and fourpence4 ,this is good2 nay1 more than good--'tis excellent4 ,but there is a dark side of the picture1 over which ,i would fain draw a veil3 but ,i must not4 ,belgium1 ,france1 ,holland1 and ,germany1 are improving1 are marching onward1 and we1 alas6 are standing still4 ,competition and cheapness combined1 are driving our gun trade into a labyrinth1 out of which it will be long ere it finds the clue of exit4 ,our manufacture of inferior gunnery has certainly reached a depth of inferiority which never any other manufacture in the world reached1 and ,i hope never will4 ,during the existence of the slave-trade1 many thousand guns per year were made of what is1 by the trade1 technically termed 8park paling10 a material only fit for such purposes2 and the cost of it was only seven shillings and sixpence each spike2 but now we can furnish slave traders with ship-loads1 if they choose1 at only six shillings and sixpence each1 and it is still supposed that one of these imitation guns is the blood-money for a fellow-creature4 ,it would be a just and equitable law1 if our legislature would pass it1 8,that every man should fire the guns he manufactures30 nothing would more surely tend to improve the quality of guns of a low grade4 ,a considerable increasing difficulty attends the obtaining of horse-nail stubs from the continent4 ,in various continental markets from whence we draw our supply1 the skill and ability of the gun-barrel makers have increased2 and the preference for superior fire-arms which is gaining ground with many continental sportsmen1 has taught foreigners the value of their old horse-nails2 and hence their increased scarcity4 ,the inferior iron of which we make horse-nails prevents entirely the use of our own2 consequently it requires no foresight to predict that our manufacturers will soon resolve themselves into two descriptions--the very best and the very worst4 ,the latter are already actively employed1 and the others are advancing2 as no doubt an increasing desire to obtain the most perfect gun pervades the thinking and affluent portion of the sporting world4 ,the manufacture of iron is a science truly worth the consideration of the philosopher1 for it is fraught with the most important consequences1 considered either as a material of commerce1 or the means to an end4 ,in advancing manufactures and the progress of improvement1 it has had an effect on civilization unequalled by any known product1 gold not excepted2 for no substitute exists for iron1 or ever did4 ,no doubt the ancients had their bronze1 of which they could form edge tools1 even razors2 but that was a very limited use of cutting tools3 enough1 perhaps1 for war or subsistence1 but not for the progress of the arts4 ,of the first discovery and use of iron we have no record2 though its value may be presumed from the fact1 that ,quintus ,curtius mentions that 8,alexander of ,macedon1 received a present from ,porus1 an ,indian chief1 of about #cj lbs4 weight of steel40 ,if this were a present fit for the conqueror of the world1 its value1 even at that early date1 must have been great indeed4 ,for many centuries1 up to the sixteenth1 all iron was produced by the aid of wood charcoal2 and with such contracted and limited means1 it was found that not more than #ej per cent1 of the metal contained in the ore was extracted2 consequently at this day all the ancient deposits of slag are sought for and re-smelted1 yielding a handsome return to the manufacturer4 ,the adoption of coal coke was a matter of necessity1 but it has been productive of extensive benefit in all manufactures of iron of medium quality4 ,the opinions of many men of science lead to the belief that it has benefited the higher quality also2 but ,i am quite satisfied of the reverse4 ,the quantity formerly obtained in the yield was1 as shown1 only #ej per cent4 of the quantity existing in the ore2 but yet it was the purest metal3 for it is unquestionable that the best is soonest fused4 ,the iron ore of ,great ,britain is1 beyond a doubt1 inferior to that of many parts of the world2 as all attempts to produce good steel from it have been attended ultimately with disappointment4 ,mr4 ,mushet1 in his excellent work on iron1 says1 8,the successful exertions of individuals have increased the manufacture of cast and malleable iron beyond all precedent in this country2 nor have we been without some enlightened individuals1 who have laudably endeavoured to form a superior quality along with the extension of their manufactures4 ,success has so far crowned their praiseworthy exertions1 aided by the operation of knowledge1 in removing the prejudices of the artisan1 that bar iron of our own manufacturing has been substituted1 to a great extent1 in place of that formerly used of the ,swedish and ,russian marks2 but hitherto all attempts have failed to make bars of proper quality to form steel1 in any degree comparable to that we daily manufacture in great quantities from foreign iron4 8,here we remain at an immense distance behind2 and while our manufacture of iron goods exceeds the collective exertions of all ,europe1 we humbly feel our dependence upon two foreign markets for the supply of that steel-iron1 without which the beauty1 the utility1 and extent of our hardware manufactures would be essentially injured and abridged4 8,the policy of the foreign holders of this article communicates many undue advantages to the favoured few to whom the steel-iron is consigned in this country4 ,the rapid progressive rise in value of this iron1 for many years past1 has already nearly doubled the price of steel to the workman1 and given the trade in general a melancholy foretaste of the evils of dependence and monopoly40 ,so it is with the scrap1 requisite to form good iron for gun-barrels4 ,i have had several pairs of barrels sent from ,berlin and ,vienna1 to be fitted up in the ,english style1 with a certain knowledge that they were wanted for patterns2 and in justice let it be said1 the material and figure in the barrel were most beautiful3 being a variety of ,damascus1 or fancy pattern in the metal1 superior to anything seen of this country's manufacture4 ,true1 this is not an essential requisite1 being more for appearance than utility2 but the fact clearly shows the industry and will of the artisan4 ,the iron1 too1 in clearness and density1 we can scarcely surpass2 therefore1 if ,i regret that we are not advancing with our competitors1 it proceeds from a clear conviction of the truth that we are slumbering upon our fancied superiority4 ,a friend who had lately visited ,liege1 informed me that in one gun-maker's shop alone1 were employed fourteen of our best workmen2 in fact1 he brought with him a gun which attests the great improvement the ,belgians have made of late years4 ,i have had possession of three guns1 bearing on the lock and barrels1 8,joseph ,manton1 ,london20 8,joseph ,egg1 ,london20 and 8,john ,manton and ,son1 ,london20 all of which were manufactured in ,belgium2 and so well is the imitation executed1 that it would puzzle most amateurs to discover the fraud4 ,recently a company1 entitled 8,the ,indian ,iron and ,steel ,company10 has commenced importing and and manufacturing iron and steel from ,hindostan ore1 and native-made bar iron4#g ,if they succeed in competing with ,sweden and ,russia1 this iron will be a valuable acquisition to the ,british empire4 ,they have already issued a quantity #ce per cent4 cheaper then the latter1 but quality is the end they should strive for4 ,however1 the business is in able hands1 and ,i have no doubt but that this object will be kept prominently in view4 #g ,the fine quality of the ,indian steel is generally acknowledged4 ,the iron is first obtained by smelting1 in small quantities1 the wootz-ore1 or the magnetic oxide of iron1 which it found combined with about #db per cent4 of quartz2 the yield being1 out of #ajj parts of ore1 only #ae parts of metal3 but this is of the finest character4 ,the process by which the iron is converted into steel is as follows1 and fully accounts for that peculiar quality for which the ,indian steel is valued4 ,the iron is cut into pieces and packed closely in a crucible of clay1 containing about #a lb4 only of the iron1 mixed with a tenth part of dried wood cut small1 the whole covered over with green leaves4 ,the crucible is then stopped1 by covering the mouth with tempered clay1 so as to effectually exclude the air4 ,after a time that is1 as soon as the clay-plugs are sufficiently hard1 from twenty to thirty of the crucibles are built up in an arched form placed in a small blast furnace1 and kept covered with charcoal2 thus being subjected to the heat of the furnace for two or three hours4 ,the process is then complete4 ,as soon as the crucibles are cool1 they are broken open and the cakes of steel are found rounded at the bottom4 ,the top of the cakes should be found covered with stri1 radiating from a centre1 and be free from holes or rough projections4 ,if the cakes are honeycombed1 the process has been imperfect and incomplete4 ,when re-melted and tilted into rods1 a very superior article has been the result4 ,the natives prepare the cakes for being drawn into bars1 by annealing them for several hours in a small charcoal furnace1 excited by bellows2 the current of air being made to play upon the cakes while turned over before it1 whereby a portion of the combined carbon is dissipated and the steel probably softened3 without which operation the cakes would break in drawing them4 ,they are drawn by a hammer of only a very few pounds weight1 but the repeated hammering greatly tends to the production of a highly condensed and perfect article4 ,foreseeing the difficulty that would eventually beset us in obtaining a sufficient supply of old horse nails from ,germany and elsewhere1 ,i directed my experiments to steel entirely1 having formerly perceived that where the greatest quantity of steel existed in the mixture necessary to form material for their best gun barrels1 there also existed the greatest tenuous strength4 ,i had at that time a decided objection to all steel1 as the following quotation from 8,the ,gun0 will show3-- 8,we recommend hammer-hardening in all mixtures containing iron4 ,if you throw the iron aside1 and confine your manufacture wholly to steel1 it would be an evil1 from this simple cause3--steel is of itself close enough in the grain2 hammering it1 therefore1 in a cold state1 only tends to make it more brittle4 ,but the reverse is the case with iron3 the more it is beaten the greater becomes its tenacity2 and when mixed with steel in the way the stubs-composition is1 it prevents the particles of steel from becoming too hard40 ,mr4 ,adams1 of ,wednesbury1 and the successors of ,mr4 ,clive1 of ,birmingham1 manufacture a considerable quantity both of silver steel and common twist steel for the trade2 ,i make my own laminated steel3 the difference in silver steel and common twist steel merely consists in the variety of tortuous twisting the former undergoes1 while the latter is rolled out into rods of #f-afths broad1 with the fibres running perfectly longitudinal4 ,the method of making or welding the pieces into a bloom1 is in the following way4 ,having collected a sufficiency of mild steel scraps1 such as cuttings of saws1 waste from steel pen making1 old coach springs1 and the immense variety of pieces arising from the various manufactures of tools1 they are cut into pieces of equal dimensions1 polished in a revolving drum by their friction on each other1 until quite bright1 and then placed for fusion on the bed of an air furnace4 ,the parts first fused are gathered on the end of a similarly fabricated rod1 in a welding state1 and these gather together by their adhesion1 the remainder as they become sufficiently heated1 until the bloom is complete4 ,the steel is then removed from the furnace1 and undergoes the effect of a three-ton forge hammer and the tilt1 until it forms a large square bar2 it is then re-heated1 and thence conveyed to the rolling mill1 where eventually it is reduced to the size of rod required4 ,i generally have the metal required cut into short pieces of six inches long4 ,a certain number are bundled together and welded1 and then drawn down again in the rolling mill4 ,this can be repeated any number of times--elongating the fibres and multiplying their number to an indefinite extent as may be required4 ,illustration ,the great advantage derived in this instance from air-furnace welding is a chemical one2 for while the small pieces of steel are fusing on the bed of the air furnace1 the oxygen is extracting the carbon1 and leaves the resulting metal mild steel1 or iron of the densest description2 while the succeeding hammering and rolling and re-welding1 produce the mechanical arrangement of making the whole of an extremely fibrous description4 ,the polishing secures a clean metal2 indeed1 so free from specks are the generality of barrels thus made1 that it is scarcely possible to imagine clearer metal4 ,when contrasted with the best of ordinary iron1 by a powerful microscope1 the closeness and density of grain are strongly apparent4 ,to such an extent has this been carried1 that ,i can produce specimens of a considerably increased specific gravity4 ,the barrels made of this metal1 in general1 beat all tried against them2 with this great advantage1 that the finer the polish in the interior the better they shoot1 and continue longer free from lead4 ,the only difficulty is in the working2 as the boring1 filing1 c41 are more difficult4 ,moreover1 greater care is required to see that they are not annealed1#h when in the hands of the borer or filer2 for in such case they would be considerably injured1 though not to the same extent as barrels of a softer nature4 ,i tested a great variety of bars by drawing them asunder longitudinally by the testing machine1 and the average strength of a rod of #f-afths broad by #e-afths thick and #ab inches long1 containing #adjfbe solid inches of iron1 was equal to a tension of #aa1bjj lbs4 ,this furnished a barrel having a thickness of metal in all parts of the arch equal1 or #c-afths of an inch thick1 capable of bearing an internal pressure of #f1jbb lbs4 to the inch of the tube4 #h ,dr4 ,ure falls into an error in describing the process of barrel boring3 he says 8the barrel is first properly annealed1 and allowed to cool gradually10 c4 ,the barrel-maker that would take such a proceeding with a barrel of ours should never do so to another4 ,the ,doctor ought to have pointed out the evil tendency of this4 ,we never saw it done1 and we doubt much whether he did1 though we have heard of the practice1 which induces us to notice it1 but the ,doctor describes it as a necessary proceeding4 ,the generality of barrel makers spoil this metal by an attempt to obtain figure2 for all extreme twistings in the rod depreciate the metal1 by separating the fibres3 to borrow a simile1 they obtain only an over-twisted rope4 ,this is not only disadvantageous but useless2 for the extreme density of the metal renders the figure difficult to be shown distinctly1 as acid acts upon it but slightly1 and never so well as on metal fabricated from two differently constructed carbonised materials4 ,many conjectures have been advanced1 and an endless discussion created1 to account for the watering or 8jowher0 in oriental sword-blades1 and genuine ,damascus gun-barrels4 ,anything approaching the truth is seldom met with2 though ,i think the explanation is very simple4 ,it must be well known that there is an immense variety of different qualities in both iron and steel3 no uniformity of quality is found in two productions out of a hundred4 ,the very ore1 the coal1 the presence of oxygen1 the excess of it1 all vary the quality of the material4 ,an excess of carbon is more detrimental than a scarcity2 for where carbon has once been1 it leaves an indelible mark1 and though extracted to as great an extent as practicable1 it leaves a residue that possesses an affinity to absorb carbon again equal to the original quantity3 thus1 steel once made will never1 by any process yet known1 be reconverted back to iron of the same nature it was originally4 ,mr4 ,mushet has given us the proportions of carbon held in solution by the various qualities of steel and iron1 and the reader will find them in the note below4#i ,it inevitably follows1 as a principle1 that the quantity of carbon contained in the metal--avoiding cast iron--will increase or decrease1 and thus regulate the degree of hardness of the metals in question4 ,a quantity of metals dissimilar in this particular1 mixed together1 and run into a vessel in a state of fusion1 then1 when cold1 filed and polished1 will show a variety according to the place they hold in the crystallised mass4 ,work and twist this material in all the tortuous ways and shapes it is capable of1 and you only twist the fibres of the different bodies in the same way2 and when they come to be acted upon by acid or oxidisation1 they still retain their relative positions1 forming the watering or figure1 as was the intention of the tortuous twisting4 ,all the beautiful arrangements in ,damascus figures are obtained in this way4 ,metals containing more or less carbon will always produce this watering4 ,to obtain a satisfactory proof1 any person may case-harden a few pounds weight of stubs1 and afterwards melt them in a crucible1 and run them into a receiver2 when these are worked down into the bar 7or not1 as he pleases71 dress and apply a little sulphuric acid1 and the peculiar situation the various stubs had taken in the fluid state1 will be clearly discernible4 #i ,iron1 semi-steelified1 is made with charcoal #a-aejth part4 ,soft cast steel1 capable of welding with ditto #a-abjth do4 ,cast steel1 for common purposes1 with ditto #a-abjth do4 ,cast steel1 requiring more hardness1 with charcoal #a-ijth do4 ,steel1 capable of standing a few blows1 but quite unfit for drawing with ditto #a-aejth do4 ,first approach to a steely granulated fracture is from #a-ejth to #a-djth do4 ,white cast iron1 with charcoal #a-beth do4 ,mottled cast iron1 with ditto #a-bjth do4 ,carbonated cast iron #a-aeth do4 ,and supercarbonated crude iron #a-abth do4 ,the original barrel-welders1 the real ,damascus iron-workers1 were1 like some of ours of the present day1 not the most conscientious individuals1 nor the most honourable4 ,for1 strange to say--but it is not more strange than true--on examination of most real ,damascus barrels to be met with1 we find the iron must have been so valuable as to induce the workmen to plate or veneer the superior mixture over a body of the commonest iron3 all large barrels are thus made1 rifles especially4 ,i presume the moderns borrowed the invention2 and it would be well if they made no more extensive use of it than on rifle barrels4 ,the modern method of making wire-twist and ,damascus iron1 being gradations from the same material1 are here described under one head3-- ,alternate bars of iron and steel are placed on each other1 in numbers of six each2 they are then forged into one body or bar2 after which1 if for the making of wire-twist barrels1 they are rolled down into rods of #c-hths of an inch in breadth1 varying in thickness according to the size of the barrel for which they are wanted3 if for ,damascus1 invariably #c-hths of an inch square4 ,when about to be twisted into spirals for barrels1 care must be taken that the edges of the steel and iron shall be outermost2 so that when the barrel is finished and browned it shall have the appearance of being welded of pieces the size of wires1 the whole length of the barrel4 ,a portion of the rod1 pickled in sulphuric acid1 exhibits the following appearance1 the bright parts being the steel1 the other the iron4 ,illustration ,when about to be converted into ,damascus1 the rod is heated the whole length1 and the two square ends put into the heads 7one of which is a fixture7 of a kind of lathe1 which is worked by a handle similar to a winch4 ,it is then twisted like a rope 7or1 as ,colonel ,hawker says1 wrung as wet clothes are7 until it has from twelve to fourteen complete turns in the inch1 when it presents this appearance4 ,illustration ,by this severe twisting1 the rod of six feet is shortened to three1 doubled in thickness1 and made perfectly round4 ,three of these rods are then placed together1 with the inclinations of the twists running in opposite directions2 they are then welded into one1 and rolled down into a rod #aa-afths of an inch in breadth4 ,being pickled in acid1 to eat away the iron1 it exhibits the following appearance3-- ,illustration ,this iron has long been held in great esteem4 ,it looks pretty2 but certainly does not possess either the strength or tenacity of wire-twist iron4 ,it is well known that the strength of a rope may be destroyed by twisting it too much3 so is it with this sort of iron4 ,iron is best when not twisted at all3 ,i speak of the bar4 ,it resembles wood1 inasmuch as the strands or fibres run parallel1 firmly adhere1 and add strength to each other2 if you twist those fibres you tear them asunder1 and they no longer support each other4 ,so it is with iron4 ,the objection made to the wire-twist is1 that owing to the iron and steel being perfectly separate bodies running through the whole thickness of the barrel1 there is a difficulty in welding them perfectly2 and1 of course there is danger of their breaking across1 at any trifling imperfection or mis-weld4 ,this objection is certainly well grounded1 as many barrels break in the proving4 ,i have seen a very strong barrel indeed broken across the knee without the slightest difficulty1 while1 to all appearance1 it was perfectly sound4 ,this is the reason why the manufacturers have ceased to make them1 except for the ,american trade4 ,it may be said that the fibres in the ,damascus1 after being torn asunder1 are welded anew4 ,true2 but could you ever glue the fibres of a piece of wood 7twisted in the same way7 together again1 to make them as strong as before8 ,no3 cut several pieces of wood across the grain and glue them together1 you would not expect them1 though equal in substance with a piece in which the grains run lengthwise1 to be of equal strength4 ,in short1 ,i hold a ,damascus barrel to be little superior to a common barrel1 in which the fibres run parallel to the bore4 ,all the varieties of figured barrels are but modifications of ,damascus4 ,the most endless variety possible may be attained2 a figure with the carbonised material1 showing only the ends or edges of the various lamin1 or portions of the face of that lamin1 may with equal facility be obtained1 if the patience of the artist be in proportion4 ,it would be a never-ending task1 a subject for many volumes1 to endeavour to describe a tithe of the varieties that might be1 and have been made4 ,the ,belgians are very expert at this sort of ornamental work4 ,the very minute ,damascus figure they frequently produce1 is admirable1 if beauty alone were the advantage sought in a gun barrel4 ,they use thirty-two alternate bars of steel and iron1 and roll them into a sheet of #c-afths thick1 and then slit them by a machine into square rods2 these are twisted in the way just described1 but to such an extreme as to resemble the threads of a very fine screw3 six of them are welded into one1 instead of three as with us4 ,the figure is so extremely fine as to appear not to be larger than the finest needle4 ,i have seen barrels made in ,liege1 superior in minute figure to any real ,damascus barrel1 or sword either4 ,our workmen here say the steel is better2 which ,i am inclined to think is true3 it is a branch of the gun manufacture they have long excelled in4 ,the very best 8,damascene0 workers are to be found at ,la ,chafontaine1 a few miles from ,liege1 where they dwell in as beautiful a dell as fancy could wish1 with a powerful hill-stream working their boring and grinding-mills1 thus enabling them to send their barrels into ,liege1 ready for the filer4 ,i have spent considerable time1 and taken great trouble1 to produce in ,birmingham iron equally good2 and ,i have succeeded3 but1 unfortunately1 ,englishmen are so extravagant in their ideas of value1 as to render the constant manufacture of this iron here1 a losing speculation4 ,it can1 however1 be obtained from ,belgium now1 under the amended tariff1 at ten per cent4 on the value4 ,it can be purchased there1 ready for barrel making1 at a franc per pound2 and cheap it is at that price3 two and a half francs would not purchase it here4 ,that ,damascus iron is incompatible with goodness1 ,i can and shall clearly prove4 ,experiment with the testing machine shows a rod of wire-twist #c-hths square1 containing #afhge solid inches1 as equal to a tension of #aa1bjj lbs42 whereas a rod1 when converted into ,damascus of #aa-afths of an inch in breadth1 by #d-afths in thickness1 containing #bfbe solid inches1 was only equal to #h1ifj lbs42 thus showing a clear loss of full thirty-five per cent4 ,and when welded into barrels of the dimensions described1 the relative internal strength of each is #e1jai-a_/b lbs41 and #c1bib lbs4 to the inch of tube4 ,this constitutes a great difference4 ,but unfortunately that is not all4 ,in the preceding chapter ,i noted the fact1 that all sorts of iron lose a portion of their strength by being heated or softened2 but ,i found that ,damascus suffered more than any other sort of iron1 excepting the common kinds4 ,for instance1 the bar of wire-twist would1 in the state it came from the rolling mill1 bear #aa1bjj lbs41 but1 after softening1 it would only bear #aj1ahj lbs41 being a diminution of #aj per cent4 ,a bar of ,damascus suspending a weight of #h1idj lbs41 the measure of its strength1 when annealed1 was #g1hdj lbs41 being a falling off of #ab-a_/b per cent4 ,thus1 ,i trust ,i have clearly shown1 that whatever other quality ,damascus possesses1 strength is not one of its properties4 ,it must not1 however1 be supposed that the above weight indicates its greatest strength2 on the contrary1 its strength can be increased full #bb-a_/b per cent4 by cold hammering4 ,still1 however1 it will only hold its relative position to other kinds of iron with respect to strength1 since they are all capable of having their strength increased by the same process4 ,damascus barrels have fallen much into disuse1 being rarely seen except as pistol barrels1#aj which1 together with a great quantity of counterfeits1 are made for the ,south and ,north ,american trades1 in the shape of double and single guns of a flashy appearance--all invariably veneered or plated with ribbons of this ornamental iron4 ,i shall now dismiss this subject2 after remarking1 that certainly a very handsome barrel may be made after this principle1 if too much twisting be avoided4 ,it has been seen that the rods are twisted until there is fourteen turns in the inch of length3 an excess productive of the detrimental effect mentioned2 while1 had there been but two turns1 a large proportion of strength1 if not all1 would have been retained4 ,one turn only1 under the same circumstances1 would very likely be highly beneficial2 indeed ,i have found it to be so3 one twist binds the interior strands1 as the outer does the interior in a rope1 and thus adds strength4 ,this shows that there is a medium in all things4 #aj ,the ,london makers are again using them extensively2 which is certainly no proof of their judgment4 ,the use of old horse-shoe nails is of a date nearly coeval with the use of small fire-arms4 ,these nails are made from rod iron of the best description2 and the hammering cold1 or tempering the nail1 so benefits and condenses the iron as to improve it greatly4 ,the method in use until a late period1 was to fill and force into an iron hoop1 of six or seven inches diameter1 as many stubs as it would contain1 to weld the whole1 and draw them down to a bar of such dimensions as might be required4 ,modern improvement1 however1 has shown the advantage of cleansing the stubs perfectly by a revolving drum1 and then fusing and gathering them into a bloom on the bed of an air-furnace4 ,thus a body of from #dj to #ej lbs4 of melting iron can be obtained at one heat2 a matter of economy and necessity1 where large quantities are required1 besides possessing the superior advantage of having the whole mass equally heated3 this cannot be done by the old hoop method1 as the surface must be frequently burnt before the interior is at all in a welding state4 ,experience taught the late ,mr4 ,adams and his brother ,george--who still manufacture some of the best gun iron in the world--that the stub iron alone was insufficient2 for even then 7forty years ago7 the absurdity of imagining that no barrels were or could be good without being soft1 was understood and acted upon by them4 ,they introduced at first one-fourth of steel to three of stubs2 this having been found highly advantageous1 the prejudices of the gun-makers were gradually overcome1 or left in abeyance from ignorance of the introduction4 ,it is a fact1 that as late as #ahdb1 when ,i issued my former work1 men who had been all their lives gun-makers 7by courtesy7 actually refused to believe that any steel at all entered into the composition of the best barrels2 and several whom ,i know perfectly well1 ordered the factors with whom they dealt 8to be sure to send them no barrels with steel in1 as they did not wish their customers' hands to be blown off40 ,charcoal iron has1 up to this day1 been the only stub twist barrels they 7and we believe two-thirds of the provincial makers also7 have ever been served with4 ,reason with these men1 and they will snappishly tell you1 8,we pay the best price1 and we ought to have the best3 we don't see that our neighbours have any better40 ,on one occasion of my calling upon one of the first provincial gun-makers in the kingdom1 the subject of barrels was adverted to--8,an excellent work that of yours1 ,i dare say2 but1 sir1 you have done a deal of harm3 it is wrong to let gentlemen know too much2 they give you far too much trouble3 they get too knowing40 ,these1 and such like observations1 are the only thanks ,i ever received from the generality of the gun trade4 ,there are1 however1 some enlightened men who1 understanding the subject1 have appreciated my motives2 but by far the greater proportion have done the reverse1 asserting 8that ,i had told them nothing but what they knew before40 ,the mixture of a portion of steel with the stubs having clearly shown an improvement1 an increased proportion has been adopted by various makers3 we have had as high as three-fourths of steel to one of iron4 ,where proper attention is paid to the clipping of the steel to pieces1 corresponding with the stubs1 and properly mixing the whole1 welding and forging by the heavy hammer1 reducing by a tilt and rolling down to the smallest description of rod1 a most excellent1 tenacious1 and dense body of iron is thus obtained2 while1 by cutting into lengths of six inches1 bundling a number together1 and re-welding them into a bar1 an increased density and tenacity is gained1 by an increase in quantity1 and an elongation of the fibrous system4 ,any description of barrel1 of this iron1 if made with a moderate degree of care and attention1 is considerably stronger than any explosive fluid ever yet compounded could burst1 under any circumstances bordering on fair experiment4 ,the great advantage derived from welding on the bed of an air-furnace1 arises from an absence of the minute portions of charcoal1 of either wood or coal1 as the case may be4 ,millions of these very minute portions are imbedded in the midst of the metal in every part4 ,they are enclosed in cells originally of their own dimensions1 but are drawn out with the fibres to an indefinite extent1 forming a system of tubes that may be compared to the capillary system in trees1 and making the iron of a spungy1 compressible nature4 ,it is the absence of these particles of charcoal that gives part of the superiority to steel as now made for gun-barrels2 and the existence of a portion of them causes the inferiority of all other kinds of iron4 ,in a chemical analysis of iron1 a large portion of crude coal-charcoal or wood-charcoal is found1 according as either has been used during the manufacture4 ,this is not of course given as so much carbon in the result1 though the injury is equally detrimental as an excess of carbon is to the goodness of the metal2 for it renders the whole porous1 and liable to attract moisture and induce oxidation4 ,it must be kept prominently in view1 and clearly comprehended1 that the denser the body of metal1 the less the liability to oxidise1 or in other words rust2 and here is the one great preservative principle in good iron3 8it is the fibre of dense cocoa-wood1 compared with that of willow or saugh40 ,in all situations and for all purposes1 where iron is liable to sudden changes of either heat or cold1 wet or dry1 the very best of iron should be obtained2 as it will be less affected by the changes of temperature1 and amply repay by its durability the extra cost in the first instance4 ,the very extensive round of experiments to which ,i have submitted mixtures of this nature1 clearly establishes all the conclusions ,i have formed on these points4 ,the strength of the mixture1 three parts steel to one of stubs1 gives a resistance in the rod of #f-afths broad by #e-afths thick1 and #ab inches long1 containing #adjfbe solid inches1 equal to #aj1bie lbs4 before separating2 thus being equal1 in a barrel of the dimensions before mentioned1 to an internal pressure of #e1eee lbs4 to the inch of tube4 ,the proportions mentioned in my previous work are #be lbs4 of stubs to #ae lbs4 of steel2 the strength of this mixture in the rod is equal to a tension of #h1ifj lbs41 and the barrel is capable of restraining a pressure internally of #d1hah lbs41 making full #ae per cent4 dissimilarity in favour of the larger proportion of steel3 indeed1 all experience points to the great advantage1 that steel1 properly worked1 possesses over iron alone4 ,great good can be effected by condensing iron by hammer-hardening2 greater than ,i have shown steel to be capable of receiving additionally3 as1 already having it naturally1 there is no necessity for using artificial means to obtain it4 ,nor is steel so liable to depreciation in the hands of an inexperienced artisan2 as the degree of expansion is not more1 in the large proportion of steel mixture1 than a loss of strength equal to #d-a_/b per cent1 by heating and cooling gradually4 ,the loss in the mixture containing less steel is #g-a_/b per cent4 ,the specific gravity of the two is in proportion4 ,the frequent welding and re-rolling of iron is of the most beneficial tendency1 the elongation of the fibres being highly advantageous2 for1 a fibrous piece of iron may be compared to a wire rope1 the more strands the greater tenacity2 and the smaller the strands1 even up to a proximity of fineness to the human hair1 the greater the weight they will bear in tension4 ,one large wire which1 when single1 will suspend #ejj lbs41 will1 when drawn down to six small ones1 suspend #fjj lbs42 and so on to the greatest extreme4 ,another great advantage received by the repeated reworking of iron1 is obtaining an increased density2 for when this is secured to a certain extent1 you have closed in proportion the pores of the metal2 and in this state it is not liable to that degree of expansion or contraction1 or that fluctuation in strength1 which arises from softening the iron4 ,nor can you gain1 save to a limited extent1 any improvement by hammering1--hammer-hardening1 for instance1--simply because it is already improved to the utmost extent we are at present acquainted with4 ,how wonderfully beneficial to mankind is this beautiful arrangement of the metallic fibrous system6 ,without it what could we do8 our manufactures would be confined to simple castings1 or crystallizations1 possessed merely of strength in proportion to the cohesive nature of the metal4 ,where would be all the wonderful springs whose fineness vies with the silken fibre8 ,of what could they be constructed8 ,all-powerful gold would not suffice1 nor silver2 though each1 in its place1 possesses wonderful properties4 ,gold and silver may both be spread in the thinnest conceivable coat over space incredible2 on the gilded cup1 or1 still thinner by electric agency1 on the plated epergne4 ,but iron alone is to the arts1 the 8summum bonum0 for which there is no substitute3 it is the 8sine qu non0 of practical mechanics4 ,improvements in the manufacture of a very superior iron may1 we believe1 be placed to the credit of the gunmaking profession exclusively2 no other body or class of men having ever yet deemed it worth their trouble to endeavour to obtain anything of a better description than bar iron1 suitable to make steel from4 ,mr4 ,mushet1 from whose work ,i have already quoted1 has evidently been more intimately acquainted with the routine of iron manufacturing than any other person ,i ever met with or read of3 he understands the question perfectly2 yet he seems to care for nothing further than a suitable steel iron4 ,how many and how fearful have been the explosions by all-powerful steam since the period of its introduction4 ,how many weeping widows1 and how many fatherless children have had to mourn its effects6 ,yet what has human ingenuity done1 what have the wonderful energies of the present race of scientific men accomplished to stay this annual slaughter8 ,comparatively little beyond discovery of mysterious causes where none exist4 ,it reminds me of my first lesson in coursing--8,if you want to find a hare1 young man10 said the keeper1 8look at your feet3 you will not find her at a distance40 ,so it is with the state of knowledge on steam boiler explosions2 if you want to find the cause1 look 8at your feet30 do not endeavour to envelope in mystery1 what you may find in simple and natural causes4 ,i may here observe that ,i have been professionally engaged to inspect the effects1 with a hope of finding the cause1 of thirty-four cases of explosion1 where the sacrifice of human life was above an average of two each1 or nearly one hundred1 and ,i never yet have found one single case which could not be clearly demonstrated to have been caused either solely by neglect of the superintendent1 or from sheer ignorance on the part of the engineer constructing the arrangement of boilers4 ,for every accident may sweepingly be said to be occasioned by a want of space for the escape of the steam3 a too small valve1 in the first instance1 and in the second1 a villanous construction of what is called iron boiler plate--a concentration of the veriest rubbish1 under the name of wrought iron1 ever gathered together4 ,for this reason1 ,i have drawn the reader's attention aside for a few moments4 ,the improvement of boiler-iron may detain us slightly1 if by the delay any good can be accomplished4 ,for an inconsiderable increase of outlay1 a boiler might be rendered doubly safe to what it is at present1 by simply using moderate caution in the selection of scrap iron1 a perfect cleansing of that scrap1 and by fusing the bloom on the bed of an air furnace4 ,the great advantage would be that you would get a stronger1 a much denser1 and consequently a much better1 metal3 nor is this all the advantage2 you might use a very much thinner plate1 which would yet be equally strong2 and science will tell you that steam would be more easily generated1 as heat is more rapidly conducted4 ,there is a very handsome description of barrel-iron made1 generally termed 8,stub-,damascus40 ,the method of preparing it1 is of late considerably altered4 ,a quantity of old files are hardened1 by being2 heated red-hot and immersed in water1 then broken in pieces with a hammer1 and afterwards pounded in a mortar until the pieces do not exceed in size a corn of number five shot4 ,a proportion of #ae lbs4 of these to #be lbs4 of stubs1 is fused together on the bed of an air-furnace1 beaten down1 and rolled into rods4 ,the rod of #c-hths of an inch square1 is twisted like a rope1 precisely in the same way as the ,damascus4 ,the effect of this winding1 is to give a beautiful mottle to the barrel2 which will be found depicted in plate ,no4 #c4 ,another mixture1 represented in plate ,no4 #b1 was first made by ,mr4 ,wiswould1 of ,birmingham4 ,it is a compound1 so far as ,i have been able to ascertain1 of three parts of steel to two of iron1 intimately blended and intermixed1 and twisted as just described4 ,it is a most beautifully clean and dense iron2 but the extreme twisting is to it1 as to all1 highly injurious and prejudicial4 ,the twisting is similar to the ,damascus2 only that two twisted rods are welded together instead of three1 and with the twist of the strands running in opposite angles1 as depicted in the wood-cut below4 ,illustration ,the degree of strength is similar to that of the stub1 and other ,damascus2 it being quite certain1 that1 be the composition what it may1 this rending of the cohesive attachment by twisting1 will eventually equalise the strength of the whole4 ,the use and introduction of what is called 8charcoal-iron10 is one of the shams reared and supported by the hotbed of competition and deception combined3 a wish to foist on the purchaser a counterfeit for the real metal4 ,i would not give shop-room to the best barrels ever made from such a compound4 ,i hate a scoundrel and a hypocrite2 this iron exemplifies the qualities of both4 ,this worthless compound consists principally of cuttings of sheet iron2 of which there is an endless supply in the neighbourhood of ,birmingham1 from punchings and from one inferior metal and another4 ,after properly cleaning1 a quantity is put into a charcoal furnace and melted1 cast into a pig1 then forged down to a bar1 and rolled into rods corresponding with the size of stub twist1 which it is intended to represent4 ,the action of the charcoal communicates to it a portion of carbon1 which1 when stained in a certain way1 gives an appearance much resembling that beautiful metal just mentioned 7stub-,damascus72 but if every means imagined by the inventive faculty of man were employed upon it1 it could not be made into really good iron4 ,an iron which is technically termed 8weak10 can never be made a strong bodied iron1 or an 8iron suitable to make steel10 to repeat a former quotation4 ,the original iron from which these scraps generally come1 is required to be 8weak0 iron1 for the facility with which it can be rolled into plates2 a strong fibrous iron is not necessary4 ,its greatest strength appears to be as follows3 #g-afths of an inch broad1 and #e-afths thick1 solid contents #adjfce inches1 will bear a weight of #aj1jhj pounds2 so that if my calculations are correct1 it will bear only a pressure of #d1ebf pounds in the tube4 ,the loss of strength by heating or softening1 being full #aj per cent4 ,this converted iron1 however1 will not endure the test of browning by smoke1 or1 more properly1 flame2 as the oxygen invariably destroys the appearance of steel in twelve hours after its application4 ,by the old method of staining1 it would be as impossible for any man1 who was not a judge1 to point out the real from the counterfeit1 as to discern a copy executed by a clever artist from an original painting by one of the old masters4 ,but deception is ever fertile in expedients1 and an ingenious invention was soon found out to imitate the advantage possessed by the 8smoke brown10 which they obtain by first browning or staining the barrels very dark4 ,a weak solution of muriatic acid1 or spirits of salt1 is applied very lightly with a sponge1 and the colour is extracted from those portions of the iron left more prominent1 by the excessive pickling they are subjected to before staining2 they are then immediately dried1 scalded with hot water1 and the stain is complete2 it is a most ingenious imitation4 ,i have already stated that this iron is very much used in consequence of its cheapness2 its cost being only fourpence per pound1 while stub twist costs fivepence4 ,it is also easily worked1 being considerably softer than any of the above-described kinds of iron4 ,it may be asked1 why so much inferior iron is used1 when the difference in the price between the good and the bad is only a penny per pound8 ,the reason is this3--,if a barrel filer receive an order for a pair of barrels1 he 7having probably deceived his customer before1 or1 at any rate1 knowing that he can deceive him without running any risk of detection7 sends to the welder sufficient charcoal-iron to forge these barrels4 ,should the quantity amount to ten pounds1 he1 of course1 saves tenpence4 ,the welder receives two shillings less for welding this description of iron1 than for welding stub-twist2 so that here is already a saving of #bs4 #aj;d4 ,at the boring-mill1 and the grinding-mill1 the charge is also proportionate3 the wages of the journeymen are less2 so that by imposing on his customer one pair of barrels manufactured of this sort of iron instead of the real stub-twist1 he pockets a clear gain of above #is42 and should he manufacture one hundred pair of such barrels in the year1 it would make at the end no small item in the year's account of profit4 ,thus it is with all description of barrels4 ,the charge for making1 by each workman1 in the various stages of the manufacture1 is according to the quality of each pair of barrels4 ,the saving1 then1 to the man who makes one hundred pairs of barrels in the year1 though it be but a farthing in the pound of iron1 amounts to a considerable sum4 ,this fraudulent gain of more than #es4 on a pair of pretended stub barrels1 is what is called in ,birmingham1 8doing the natives10 and is a reward for ingenious knavery4 ,when orders are given by what are called general factors1 who very kindly supply their country friends at a moderate commission of #dj to #ej per cent41 these gentry take care to lap up the cream2 for we know from facts that the barrel filer has sometimes scarcely five per cent4 for his trouble of overlooking4 ,one consequence naturally results from this1 that every species of deception will be resorted to1 in order to indemnify workpeople for their labour and trouble4 ,at the present time1 ,i have no doubt that there are hundreds of guns made in ,birmingham1 the barrels of which1 in some instances1 never enter the proof house3 as eightpence per barrel1 the cost of proof1 is a great temptation6 ,besides1 a great number of barrels declared 8wasters0--such as repeatedly bulged in the proof1 are full of flaws1 have holes in the sides1 or some other fault sufficient to condemn them in the eyes of a moderately conscientious barrel-maker--are bought by men who live by this species of fraud2 and are repaired with great neatness1 by putting in pieces artfully1 beating down swellings or bulges4 ,then the proof-mark 8of doubtful identity20 and1 last of all1--mark6--they fit them up1 and send them to the engraver to have the name of some living or defunct ,london gun-maker of respectability engraved upon them1 and palm them off upon some dealer as a good article4 ,i commend to the reader the advice of 8,edward ,davies10 a gentleman who wrote in #afai2 who says 8,he that loves the safetie of his own person1 and delighteth in the goodness and beautie of a piece1 let him always make choice of one that is double breeched2 and if possible1 a ,mylan piece1 for they be of tough and perfect temper1 light1 square1 and bigge of breech1 and very strong where the powder doth lie1 and where the violent force of the fire doth consist1 and notwithstanding thinne at the end4 ,our ,english pieces approach very neare unto them in beautie and goodness1 7their heaviness only excepted7 so that they be made of purpose1 and not one of these common sale pieces1 with round barrels1 whereunto a beaten souldier will have great respect1 and choose rather to pay double money for a good piece1 than to spare his purse and endanger himself40 ,truly1 the fraternity have always1 we find1 been of doubtful honesty3 always making 8sale pieces40 8,threepenny skelp iron0 is made from an inferior quality of scrap to that from which 8charcoal iron0 is made2 but unlike it1 there is no pretension of quality4 ,its inferiority is not denied2 it is poor in quality1 and suits parties who cannot buy better4 ,the method of preparing is by an air-furnace1 forge1 tilt and rolling mill1 as before described4 ,the greatest strength of a bar #aa-afths broad by #c-afths thick1 containing #aedfh solid inches1 is #g1hdj lbs42 or equal to an internal pressure of #c1hda lbs4 to the inch of tube4 ,one particular fact attaches to all kinds of inferior iron--the greater the mass acted upon by the rollers the greater the variation of strength4 ,this arises entirely from the increased sponginess of the metal1 and its greater expansibility4 ,for instance1 a rod #a-afth thicker1 is #ae per cent4 weaker in proportion2 and so on to the greatest extent4 ,but on the other hand1 it is capable of recovering a great increase of strength by cold hammering2 greater than better iron4 ,a considerable quantity of this iron is sold to engineers1 and used in the construction of locomotive and other engines2 the price and uniformity of texture in grain fitting it for that purpose4 8,twopenny0 or 8,wednesbury skelp0 is almost too bad to be used in making an article which may endanger the limbs of our fellow creatures1 and is now little used1 fortunately4 ,it is made of an inferior scrap to the former1 in precisely the same manner2 and in point of strength is still lower4 ,the bar is generally #a and #a-afth inches in breadth1 by #c-afths thick1 the solid contents #b inches and #be-fdths1 and will bear a weight of #g1hdj pounds2 consequently the strength will be #b1hdj pounds to the inch of tube4 ,this is a great falling-off in strength2 and ,i would ask any one who values the safety of his hand1 if he would like to risk it1 by using a gun made of iron possessing so low a degree of strength1 as compared to the force of the charge it has to bear8 ,let him recollect that the force of the charge may be increased by a variety of circumstances4 ,the pressure of a certain quantity of powder1 on which a certain weight of shot is placed1 is so many pounds to the inch2 and if you double that weight of shot1 you nearly double the pressure4 ,in estimating the force of pressure1 the opposing friction is also to be taken into account4 ,if the gun be allowed to get very foul1 then friction is increased1 and of course a still greater pressure is thrown on the tube of the barrel4 ,all these circumstances being taken into consideration1 ,i repeat1 that no barrel is safe1 whose power of resistance is not more than double the strength of a charge of sufficient force for general shooting4 ,every bad gun should be thrown aside as unsafe1 or used with the greatest caution4 ,bad and inferior guns are made from the foregoing material2 and not many years have elapsed since it was thought good enough for military arms4 8,sham damn skelp0 is made from the most inferior scrap4 ,i should not have mentioned this description of iron had ,i not seen hundreds of barrels made of it1 all which are utterly unfitted for the use of any person who cares at all for his safety4 ,i have met with them frequently under the dignified name of twisted barrels4 ,guns that are fitted up at from ten to twelve shillings each are not of course patent breeched1 but are made to appear so by staining them generally blue1 and by having a couple of bands to imitate platina1 across the squares4 ,a projecting part is welded on to the side1 into which the nipple is inserted1 and the lock joints neatly under it4 ,many of them are good imitations2 but only take the barrel out of the stock and the deception is instantly apparent1 as it is rarely carried further than the outside4 ,the beautiful way in which the barrels are painted to imitate fine twist1 catches the eye of the simple countryman1 who is generally the dupe of this artifice2 and the persuasive eloquence of the itinerant hardwareman1 seldom fails to extract from the pocket of his unsuspecting purchaser sometimes thirty or forty shillings of his earnings for what the modest trader rarely pays above fifteen shillings4 ,many are the anathemas vented1 when the deception is found out by some one more knowing than the dupe1 who not unfrequently purchases his experience at the expense of a finger or a hand4 ,it is astonishing what a quantity of this rubbish is disposed of by hawkers who infest market towns and villages with guns for sale4 ,but the ,english peasant is not the only dupe of this species of knavery4 ,thousands of these guns are sent monthly to the ,united ,states1 to the ,brazils1 and ,south ,america2 where they are disposed of1 among the poor ,indians1 in exchange for skins and furs4 ,they are all understood to be 8proved40 ,how many are so who can tell2 but that some of them are not1 there can be no doubt4 ,it is said that the manufacture of these guns is a great support to the gun trade of ,birmingham4 ,in one respect it is1 certainly2 yet would not the interest of the trade be advanced1 if we were to manufacture none of so inferior a quality8 8,but then10 it will be urged1 8we could not compete with our rivals in ,germany and the ,netherlands40 ,true1 we should not be their rivals in the production of rubbish2 but the superiority of our guns would then command a better market4 ,by sending to the market an article no better than theirs1 we have made foreigners indifferent about the purchase of ours3 they say 8,the ,english guns are no better than the ,belgian or ,german2 we may as well purchase one as the other40 ,the force of this remark is illustrated by the state of the ,african trade4 ,the base kind of articles we supplied them with some years ago1 has produced a distrust of our manufacture1 which will not easily be removed2 and a similar distrust is engendered by the same cause in the minds of our present customers4 ,it is much to be deplored that the eagerness for present gain1 should render men blind to the consequences of their conduct1 and lead them to prefer the immediate gratification of their avarice even to their own future prosperity2 to say nothing of the welfare of the trade of the country4 ,the method ,i suggested of testing all iron in the bar would go far to destroy this trade4 ,i have not thought it worth while to test this iron4 ,but twist barrels are made of it4 ,should the reader meet with a double gun so made1 let him avoid it3 it is unsafe1 unless it be so heavy as to be unmanageable4 ,a great many long rifle barrels are made of this iron1 principally for the ,american trade2 but from their immense weight1 and the small charge of powder required1 there does not exist the same danger from their use4 ,fowling-piece barrels made of it may be generally recognised by the smallness of the bore and the thickness of metal4 ,as the charge of powder used in proving is very small when compared with the charges for proving guns of a wider calibre1 we need not be surprised that many of those that are proved stand proof4 8,swaff iron forging0 is a profitable branch of forging carried on in ,birmingham under the above title4 ,it is a metal which is composed of iron and steel filings1 chippings of breeches1 pieces and cuttings of the ends of the screws1 lock-plates1 cocks1 the rough borings of barrels1 and all other small scraps found in gunmakers' and other workshops4 ,these are collected by the boys in each shop1 and when they have accumulated1 are sold to the 8swaff-forger10 the proceeds being considered as drinking money4 ,they are forged into bars of iron by attaching them together and immersing them in diluted sulphuric acid2 then1 after draining it from them again1 and placing a large iron pan full in a hot situation1 they become cemented together by the action of the oxide4 ,the compound is then taken from the pan1 by turning it upside down1 and is put into an air-furnace heated to a welding heat1 being thence removed and beaten into a bar3 three men with light hammers beating it as quickly as they do in welding a gun-barrel4 ,this iron is sold to the gun-work forgers1 for the forging of the patent breeches1 lock-plates1 furniture1 and other parts of the gun which they think worthy of good iron2 but since cheapness has become so much the order of the day1 the use of this iron is confined to the forging of best gun-work1 cast iron being thought quite good enough for common gun-work4 ,,chapter ,v4 ,,gun-,,making4 ,in this chapter ,i shall briefly describe the process of the manufacture of guns of all qualities1 commencing with barrel-welding2 which1 in importance1 is inferior only to the quality of iron in the routine of good gun-making4 ,birmingham1 and the surrounding districts1 are the only places in ,england where barrel-welding is practised4 ,the superior advantage possessed in having coal nearly 7if not entirely7 free from the presence of the sulphuret of iron1 which has always been found a considerable hindrance to the obtainment of clear and good barrels1 is greatly in their favour4 ,for a considerable period individuals in ,london contended with the ,warwickshire welders2 but being an unequal contest1 it ended in favour of the provincialists4 ,this is to be regretted1 as there can be no doubt but that greater reliance could be placed on the material of the ,london manufacture4 ,but a considerable drawback existed with the latter3 they made only one sort of barrel1 and that the best4 ,now it is requisite to have a fire fitted for the purpose of welding best barrels--tempered1 as it were--and this can only be effected by some hours' using1 which is generally employed in the production of a number of very inferior barrels4 ,as the ,london people made no common guns1 and needed no inferior barrels1 they welded their best barrels in a raw1 untempered fire2 and hence arose the admitted inferiority of their work4 ,the late ,mr4 ,fullard struggled long and hard in the competition2 but with his death1 barrel-welding ceased in the metropolis4 ,indeed it would have been highly imprudent and unprofitable for any one to have entered upon such a speculation2 there being no certainty of success1 but rather of the contrary4 ,the ,birmingham barrel-welders are wonderfully clever smiths3 they cannot be excelled4 ,if ridden with a curb1 they do well2 but no opportunity must be given them1 or to a certainty they will 8bolt0 from the true path4 ,the metal rods are twisted by means of two iron bars1 the one fixed the other loose4 ,in the latter there is a prong or notch to receive one end2 and when inserted1 the bar is turned by a handle4 ,the fixed bar preventing the rod from going round1 it is bent and twisted over the moveable rod like the pieces of leather round the handle of a whip4 ,the loose bar is unshipped1 the spiral knocked off1 and the same process recommenced with another rod4 ,the length of all the spirals depends on the breadth of the rod3 for instance1 the stub-twist has sixteen circles in six inches long2 a rod of five feet will make a spiral of only seven inches2 while iron1 of an inch in breadth1 will make a spiral of as many inches long as there are twists3 hence the reason why best barrels have more joinings than common ones of equal length4 ,the ,damascus being rolled into rods of #aa-afths broad forms a spiral with the appearance shown in the accompanying woodcut4 ,illustration ,the fancy steel barrels and others1 where the rod is formed of more than one piece1 such as the stub ,damascus1 c41 is of rather greater breadth1 like the representation below4 ,illustration ,the iron made from stubs and steel1 and plain fibrous steel1 is invariably rolled down into rods of #f-afths broad1 forming a spiral1 as below4 ,illustration ,a proper attention to the fineness of the spiral will always enable an amateur to detect any attempt at imposition4 ,the spiral formed from the rod of charcoal iron has a somewhat different appearance2 but in cases where it is intended to supply the place of the real stub iron it is of corresponding dimensions1 and in general very difficult to detect without a very intimate knowledge indeed of the nature of iron4 ,when honestly intended1 it forms a similar spiral to the accompanying one4 ,illustration ,the wideness of the twist1 or the angular direction of the fibres1 will enable the most uninitiated to recognise a barrel made from threepenny skelp iron3 the very few welds required1 is one cause of the cheapness of barrels made from it4 ,judgment may be formed of it from the following representation4 ,illustration ,twopenny1 or ,wednesbury skelp is coarser in the spiral still1 and running so angular as not to be very difficult to detect4 ,illustration ,all iron formed in spirals1 as a matter of certainty1 forms twist barrels--the parties whose use they are intended for1 seldom know or care for anything further than having 8a twist barrelled gun40 ,the advantage of sham damn iron being twisted is all imaginary3 if used at all1 it may be twisted2 but those who value their safety would consult it best by tying a large stone to such a gun and sinking it fathoms deep4 ,but to satisfy those who may fancy such things1 ,i give a woodcut of the spiral ready for welding4 ,illustration ,the spirals being thus formed1 the welders commence their day's work4 ,the batch consists of a foreman1 one on whose skill all depends1 and two subordinates1 whose duty it is to blow the bellows1 strike1 c4 ,they proceed to weld probably a dozen long common barrels for the ,american trade2 which are generally composed of the inferior iron mentioned before1 rolled into two lengths of different thicknesses4 ,these skelps are heated1 and beaten on a groove until they form a tube half closed4 ,they are then heated again1 and closed with one edge over-lapping the other2 as a brazier would over-lap the edge of a tin pipe1 for boys to blows peas with4 ,having got the two lengths of the whole dozen turned into tubes1 they proceed to weld the longer length or forepart1 by heating it sufficiently for four or five inches1 introducing a mandril of the required size to suit the bore wanted1 and then beating it into a perfect tube1 in a groove on the anvil1 of corresponding diameter2 heating it again and again1 until the joint is closed the whole length4 ,they then proceed with the other eleven foreparts1 and advance the whole to that stage before welding on the breech lengths2 which are now partially heated by laying on the outskirts of the fire1 to be in readiness3 they are then closed the same as the foreparts4 ,the end1 when about to be jointed1 is opened a little on the peam of the anvil1 to admit a portion of the end of the forepart2 which is introduced as soon as both are in a welding state3 the mandril is then introduced1 and the joint is perfected1 in less time than we have occupied in the description4 ,the other part of the tube is closed1 and the barrel is then complete4 ,if1 however1 the breech part is to be square or octagon shaped1 it is not welded in a groove1 but on a plain surface4 ,competition has reduced this department of the trade to a low ebb2 thousands of these sort of barrels being now annually welded for about eightpence each3 if to this we add one penny farthing per pound for six pounds of iron1 we get a forged gun barrel for one shilling and threepence halfpenny4 ,this is certainly a poor remuneration for sweating over a furnace containing from two to three hundredweight of intensely heated coal4 ,the introduction of welding by the rolling mill1 will eventually supersede this arrangement2 a matter to be regretted only on the score of its answering the purpose of preparing the fire for best welding4 ,of late years rolling has nearly superseded this description of welding4 ,illustration ,they now commence the welding of twist barrels4 ,spirals that are intended for the breech end1 are heated to a welding heat for about three inches1 removed from the fire1 and jumped close by striking the end against the anvil4 ,again they are heated1 and again jumped1 to ensure the perfect welding4 ,they are then beaten lightly in a groove1 to make them round4 ,the neatest part of the process consists in the joining of the points of the two rods1 so as to make the barrel appear as if it had been twisted out of one rod4 ,the ends of the two rods are a little detached1 brought from the fire1 and applied to each other2 a gentle tap is then given1 and the union is perfect in an instant4 ,the rapidity and dexterity with which this is accomplished1 ought to be seen to be duly appreciated4 ,this trouble is only taken with the best barrels4 ,in the manufacture of barrels of an inferior description1 the ends of the rods are cut in a sloping direction1 and when welded together1 become quite square at the part where the pieces are joined4 ,in a finished barrel the points of junction are easily recognised4 ,by tracing the twist1 a confusion will be found to exist for about an eighth of an inch1 every six or seven inches2 and from this appearance you may conclude that1 for a barrel so joined1 the welder had not the best price4 ,having joined the whole of the spirals1 three inches are again heated to a welding heat1 the mandril is introduced1 and the tube hammered1 in a groove1 to the size required4 ,this operation is repeated until the whole length is finished4 ,then follows hammer-hardening3 that is1 beating the barrel1 in a comparatively cold state1 in a groove1 with light hammers1 for the space of half an hour4 ,this is a most important part of the process4 ,it closes the pores1 condenses the texture of the metal1 compresses a greater substance into less bounds1 increases greatly the strength of the barrel1 and renders it more elastic4 ,yet this is seldom done1 unless specially requested2 and then a gratuity is1 of course1 expected either in money or beer4 ,a few pots of the juice of ,sir ,john ,barleycorn will infuse more strength into your barrels than you could purchase for ten times the amount in money2 as they have the effect of making the hammers descend with increased velocity4 ,if all barrels were hardened in this manner1 their shooting powers would be increased1 and they would not be so liable to burst in the hands of the sportsman4 ,this1 however1 cannot be done1 unless the purchaser either sees it done himself1 or has it done under the superintendence of some person on whom he can depend4 ,the ,birmingham workmen1 if well paid and well looked after 7to counteract the bad habits they have acquired from being employed in the manufacture of so large a quantity of goods of an inferior quality71 would produce an article superior to any that could be produced1 at the same cost1 in any other part of the world4 ,the ,belgian welders do their work at considerably less cost in coal than our ,english workmen4 ,coal1 it is well known1 is very dear in ,liege1 and necessity may have taught them the extreme of economy both in the size of their fire and the duration of it4 ,they effect this by adding to two-thirds of coal1 beat into dust1 one-third of clay2 the latter is mixed with the coal by being put into a wooden barrel1 the two well stirred up together1 and the water drained from it4 ,even this mixture is used sparingly3 the fire being scarcely larger than might be held in the two hands1 while with us little short of two hundredweight suffices3 which is unquestionably a great and unnecessary waste4 ,true the ,belgian does not get through the great quantity of work the ,englishman does by having 8a great many irons in the fire0 at once2 but he certainly does it well and clean3 the quantity of earthy matter in the ,belgian's fire gives a great heat1 which also is retained longer2 and it is also free from any excessive quantity of particles of charcoal4 ,all twist barrels undergo a similar round2 the time and care bestowed upon them depending entirely on the price1 which varies from one pound per pair down to eighteenpence1 and in some instances lower4 ,in a former work ,i noticed the introduction of a villanous system of covering or plating barrels with fine iron over a body of very inferior iron4 ,i here quote that description3-- ,the deceptions practised in this branch of manufacture are numerous1 and injurious to the trade4 ,for instance1 if you wish to have a heavy single barrel made from ,damascus1 or any of the best irons1 and you send to the manufacturer the weight of iron required1 the probability is1 that unless you superintend the manufacture yourself1 iron of an inferior quality will be introduced into the inside of the spirals4 ,by this fraud they obtain iron worth threepence a pound more than that which they knavishly insert into the barrel4 ,i had been repeatedly told of this practice1 but was incredulous4 ,however1 ,i gave an order for four very heavy rifle barrels to be made of ,damascus iron4 ,they were made2 but on pickling these barrels for the purpose of showing the figure of the ,damascus1 ,i discovered that the iron seemed to be much more easily eaten away at the muzzle than on the surface4 ,this led me to examine them1 when ,i found that the inside was entirely composed of iron1 over which the covering of ,damascus had been twisted4 ,but for the pickling1 this fraud never would have been detected2 yet for these barrels ,i was charged at the rate of two barrels for each4 ,since this occurred1 ,i have subjected many heavy barrels to examination1 and have found the fraud to be very common4 ,the practice is not only dishonest1 but spoils the gun1 by destroying the shooting power1 in consequence of the metals1 being of different temperatures1 not acting together at the moment of expansion4 ,illustration ,veneering or plating barrels is more extensively practised in ,belgium than in any other nation we are acquainted with2 they do not conceal it1 but they use equally good iron1 though not ornamented iron3 of this there is much doubt4 ,the method of accomplishing this is by having the iron required rolled down into ribbons of a thin description2 these are twisted spirally round a tube of common iron having the fibres running length-ways1 or parallel with the bore4 ,the accompanying cut will convey an idea of this method4 ,many will ask what inducement have the welders to take this extra trouble8 ,gain4 ,the cost of ,damascus is #g-a_/b;d4 per pound1 and the iron they use for this purpose is only #a-a_/d;d4 ,a pair of barrels take #ad lbs4 of iron2 say #f lbs4 of this is ,damascus plate1 costing #cs4 #i;d42 #h lbs4 is common1 amounting to #aj;d4 instead of #es41 or a saving of #ds4 #b;d4 a pair4 ,a splendid profit if you order one hundred4 ,the borer charges less1 the iron is softer1 the filer has less1 and all items clubbed amount to something4 ,the facility with which welders can do this is wonderful2 it clearly establishes their ability1 and proves their claim to be considered the cleverest blacksmiths on the face of the earth4 ,it is not only the best descriptions of iron they plate with3 twopenny skelp is more in use than any4 ,it is now rare to meet with painted barrels3 all are genuine twist barrels1 warranted2 for they are mostly all plated1 even down to the gun costing but fourteen shillings1 wholesale price4 ,this is a subject of serious importance2 one which the gun-makers1 both metropolitan and provincial1 should resolutely condemn2 for safety as well as goodness of shooting cannot be secured in perfection with any barrels so constructed4 ,i have met with plated barrels in guns which cost the purchaser thirty-five guineas1 and ,i have detected them in some of the first makers' guns2 for the perfection with which the fraud is accomplished is wonderful1 and few can detect it who are not strictly up to 8the dodge40 ,the application of a portion of sulphuric acid into the tube at the breech end of the barrel1 is the best way of showing the fraud2 for1 in most cases1 it is all bored out at the thin portion of the muzzle1 and the application there would1 under these circumstances1 be no test4 ,i have frequently been applied to by many masters in the trade for advice in the recommendation of a barrel-maker4 ,it is at all times an invidious task to act as a selector for individuals1 and to give praise to one man over another2 more especially where the merits of workmen approximate near to each other4 ,but in barrel-making1 a man1 to be a master of his trade1 should not only be a good workman1 breeching and filing well1 but should possess a good eye in putting barrels together 7for here everything depends upon the eye7 and finishing them highly3 these are only a portion of the abilities a barrel-maker should possess4 ,several of the ,london barrel-makers are exceedingly good workmen1 for ,i have tried them all2 but only converse with them1 and you find the technicalities of the work is all they can discourse upon3 the iron1 the vital principle1 is ,greek to them2 they know nothing about it1 and care less4 ,how can these men be guides in the right direction8 ,they may have seen barrels welded2 but1 if so1 it is only a matter of chance3 even in ,birmingham1 where this can be seen daily1 nineteen out of twenty know nothing theoretically4 ,you will frequently hear them heaping anathemas on a hard barrel1 when floating it1 and wishing the man who invented steel barrels 8in the shades below40 ,ask these men's opinions1 and if they expect to have the job of filing the barrels1 they will surely recommend you soft iron1 stub-twist1 or charcoal-iron4 ,illustration ,boring and grinding gun-barrels generally take place under the same roof2 the borer occupying a very small shop1 the grinder a large one4 ,two men and two boys are generally found in a shop4 ,there are four benches1 to each a spindle1 in which there is an oblong hole to receive the end of the boring bit4 ,the barrel is secured on a sort of carriage1 which is at liberty to traverse the whole length of the bench4 ,a boring bit is then selected of suitable size2 it is put into the spindle1 and the point introduced into the end of the barrel4 ,a sort of lever is then taken and hooked on to a kind of staple1 or a piece of hooked iron 7a number of which are fixed in one side of the bench the whole length71 and passed behind the carriage to force it up to the bit2 this is removed and fixed again1 until1 by forcing up the carriage1 the boring bit has passed through the whole of the barrel4 ,during this operation a stream of water is kept playing on the barrel to keep it cool4 ,a bit1 of larger dimensions1 is next introduced and passed through2 then others of still larger dimensions1 until the whole of the scales or blacks are entirely bored out2 or until the barrel has become so large in the bore1 as to preclude any further boring with safety4 ,if the scales are of great extent1 the fault is the forger's1 and the loss will consequently be his4 ,if the barrels be found perfect1 they are sent back to the filer1 or he comes to inspect them1 in order to ascertain whether they be perfectly straight in the inside2 if not1 to make them so4 ,the necessity of great care and attention to this point1 must be very obvious2 for1 if not perfectly correct at this stage1 it will require more skill and time to get it correct afterwards than the generality of barrel-makers are inclined to bestow4 ,when the inside has been found to be all right1 the barrel is ready for grinding4 ,many barrel-makers turn their barrels entirely by self-acting lathes1 and thus obtain a correct taper from breech end to muzzle4 ,experience has clearly convinced us that this is not the best shape1 but slightly hollow towards the muzzle is preferable1 as additional weight there is decidedly injurious1 and the shooting of barrels of lighter construction is decidedly better4 ,the generality of ,birmingham barrels are ground to the size required on large stones1 which revolve at a terrific rate4 ,the skill acquired by many of the workmen is astonishing4 ,over and over again1 have we seen barrels coming from the mill put into the lathe1 and found almost as true as if they had been turned4 ,they have a method of allowing the barrel to revolve in their hands at half the rate of the stone1 and by this means they grind them so fine that many would be puzzled to determine whether they had been turned or ground1 were the barrel smoothed lengthways merely to take out the marks of the stone4 ,we have seen the squares of a rifle barrel ground to as perfect an octagon as the eye could assist in forming4 ,best barrels are generally turned after they are ground4 ,inferior barrels are struck up with a large rubber1 or smooth1 by boys2 in some instances by women4 ,there is one advantage derived from grinding barrels1 namely1 that the friction of the stone being continuous1 the temper of the barrel is not so much affected as where the tool in the slide-rest is cutting a considerable portion at once2 for all barrels are best1 and superior to their compeers1 which require least metal to be either ground or turned off their surface1 as there is a density on the outer which is not in the interior portion4 ,the harder the material1 the less the extent of this objection4 ,to obtain the true form1 it is important that they should be turned4 ,the way of fixing them in the lathe is by having a number of plugs or mandrils1 which are perfectly true1 and of various sizes1 to fit different bores2 these are centred and put in the lathe2 a carrier is then secured on a part of the plug that projects out of the breech-end of the barrel1 and then put into the face-plate of the lathe1 which carries it round4 ,the leading screw that travels the slide-rest1 is then set in the angle to which the barrel is to be turned 7though some lathes have not the power of alteration1 but turn all barrels in one angle72 the slide is next adjusted to the thickness of the muzzle wanted1 and1 when all is ready1 the lathe is set going2 the leading screw is turned at the same moment by the machinery connected1 which keeps the tool cutting sufficiently keen to turn a barrel in about twenty-five minutes4 ,this being done1 nothing more is required than a fine smooth file to remove the marks of the tool4 ,there can be no doubt of the superiority of this mode of turning barrels1 if due care only be taken with the tool4 ,if it get blunted by any scales or impurities1 it is apt to tear pieces out of the barrel1 similar to the rings that may be noticed in a slovenly bored barrel1 owing to dirt getting on the edges of the bit4 ,in turning a barrel by a common lathe1 it is fixed in the same manner as before2 about an inch of the surface at the breech and the muzzle is turned to the diameter wanted2 the rest is then removed1 and half an inch more is turned four or five inches from either end2 then another half inch1 at another distance of four or five inches1 and so on1 according to the length2 making an allowance each time in the depth of the turning1 according to the taper of the barrel4 ,the iron between these cuttings is then filed off by floats the lengthways of the barrel1 or more frequently ground off2 this is a sure mode of getting the barrels perfectly straight on the outside1 and without any of those hollows and shades which may be always discovered in an ill-made barrel4 ,it is astonishing how beautifully many barrels are struck by the float4 ,the mode of turning by the lathe is1 however1 cheaper1 and is now confined to military barrels4 ,there is a great diversity of opinion as to the proper inclination of a pair of double barrels4 ,it is needless to state the precise distance at which the converging lines drawn from the centre of each barrel1 and indicating the inclination of the barrels to each other1 should come to a point4 ,if we take the point of convergence of those lines at #b-a_/b yards1 it will follow that1 at #dj yards1 each barrel1 were it fixed in a vice1 would throw the centre of its charge six inches on the opposite side of the mark fired at2 but if the gun be fired from the shoulder1 the recoil will invariably cause the gun to swerve outwards1 so that at that distance it will never fail to throw the shot in a good direction for the mark or bull's-eye4 ,the subject may be understood by the following observations4 ,all tapering substances1 when laid together were the taper extended1 would come to a point at a certain distance4 ,gun-barrels are made to taper towards each other1 and some more than others4 ,to make them uniform1 it requires that they should be reduced or flattened1 so that the thick or heavy end should join closer1 to allow the point of convergence to be extended to a greater distance4 ,if1 then1 we take two barrels two feet eight inches long1 and having a solid substance of metal at the breech of #c-afths of an inch each and #a-afth at the muzzle2 it requires the difference #d-afths to be multiplied #de times 7there being that number of lengths in #dj yards7 to ascertain what distance the points of the different lines are from each other3 which will be eleven #d-afths of an inch1 or five #aj-afth inches from the centre or line of sight4 ,if you wish to reduce it from the centre1 you have to join the barrels so much nearer at the breech2 or should the inclination be too little1 the muzzle must be jointed closer4 ,as1 however1 all guns are now made very heavy at the breech1 they very seldom require any closing at the muzzle3 though it is customary to do it1 and to a great extent2 but it is owing to the ignorance of the nature of shooting4 ,different lengths require a difference in the height of the rib4 ,a greater height is also required for a person accustomed to use a crooked stock1 and less height for one accustomed to the use of a straighter one2 and so on4 ,few barrels are to be met with in which the elevation is sufficient4 ,this is a species of innovation much practised by gunmakers of the present day2 but whatever merit there may have been in the original invention1 there is none in 8the improvement10 as they term it4 ,take any of the modern barrels1 and calculate what is the real elevation of them1 and you will find it is not equal to the distance that charges will droop at forty yards1 when we consider the very large charges of shot that many are accustomed to use1 without a corresponding quantity of powder4 ,it remains then to be decided what elevation a gun should have for that distance4 ,i have tried the experiment some hundreds of times with guns of all descriptions1 both with a rest and from the shoulder1 and standing as firm as possible2 by turning quickly round1 and firing 7as we might do were a bird to spring in a situation where we could only get a snap shot7 against targets such as are used in military ball-practice1 being about six feet high1 and by means of which one can perceive where the body of the shot had struck4 ,i have also fired against the steep sides of sand-banks1 on which1 from their smoothness1 you can tell every shot that has struck them4 ,my conviction is1 that almost all guns charged 7as is the custom7 with heavy charges of shot1 droop full twelve inches in forty yards2 though by using small charges of shot you will find them to be thrown much more correctly than the heavy charges2 so that it is possible to make a gun too high on the rib for a shooter who thinks more powder and less lead preferable to much lead and little powder4 ,the elevation ,i have given will be found to be as near what is requisite as possible1 if we continue to load as heretofore2 if reduced charges of shot be adopted1 a less elevation will suffice4 ,to ascertain what elevation at the breech for the above scale is requisite1 take the thickness of the breech and muzzle1 and multiply the difference by as many times as there are lengths of your barrels in the forty yards1 and you will then ascertain what elevation they give of themselves2 and to make up the difference wanted1 must be the elevation of the rib1 which may be calculated in the same way as the barrels2 the length of the barrels being the only way of obtaining a correct idea of the height required4 ,if making woodcock guns1 less elevation is required1 the distance of shooting being shorter4 ,in large guns a greater elevation is necessary4 ,we believe1 however1 ,colonel ,hawker has fallen into an error1 when he says that long guns require a greater elevation than short ones4 ,does not a long gun keep the shot more together8 ,is not more force generated8 and is not the initial velocity greater than in a short gun8 ,if these be facts1 why is more elevation required if the shot do not droop8 ,we apprehend the ,colonel means1 if the same height be required to be given above the mark4 ,nothing can be plainer than this--that if one pair of barrels be four inches longer than another1 and the elevation the same1 there cannot be as many lengths in the forty yards of the longer barrels as of the shorter1 and hence the difference when multiplied4 ,i think1 therefore1 he cannot have taken into consideration the superiority in their shooting2 for there cannot be a doubt that1 if a gun keep the shot together longer1 it cannot require that allowance for drooping which a shorter gun does4 ,as soon as the barrels are properly jointed2 care must be taken to see that they are perfectly level4 ,if the barrels are not level1 it will be impossible to shoot correctly1 as one barrel will throw the shot above1 the other below the mark4 ,this being done1 the barrels are bound together and brazed with hard solder or brass1 for about four or five inches4 ,greater injury cannot be done to barrels than by this pernicious practice2 for they cannot be brazed without being heated to a white heat2 and by this heat all the advantages derived from hammering are dissipated at once3 the condensation is gone1 and the strength is reduced at least #ab-a_/b per cent4 ,and for what purpose8 ,under the pretence that the barrels are firmer and not so liable to become loose4 ,this is a point trivial in importance compared to the excellence and strength of the barrel2 for even if they have received no more hammering than is necessary in the forging1 they are still injured to the extent of #ab-a_/b per cent43 for even beating them when hot improves them much1 provided they be not heated again2 but if they have been cold hammered1 the injury is full #cj per cent4 ,this circumstance shows how little the principles of gun-making are understood by the first gun-makers1 the brazing of barrels being practised by all4 ,mr4 ,wilkinson admits this1 for he says--8,the practice of brazing the barrels is decidedly injurious1 by softening that part more than the other2 but if they were only soft soldered1 the inconvenience would be far greater1 as the barrels would be liable to some accident by the repeated expansion and contraction that takes place in firing1 as well as by the force required to turn out the breechings40 ,i can only say that ,i have had considerably more than five thousand pairs of barrels made and put together with soft solder only1 and not one pair has come asunder from any of the causes mentioned2 nor ever will1 with fair play4 ,on the contrary1 barrels brazed can never be sound2 for at some distance from the part heated for brazing1 you cannot get the barrels re-tinned effectually1 and thus for a considerable space between the soft and hard solder1 there is no cohesion at all4 ,barrels brazed together only for three or four inches at the breech-end1 can never be sound3 they almost invariably become so rusted under the rib1 in a few years1 as both to seriously injure the barrels1 and force the rib upwards2 therefore1 if you hard solder at all1 do so from breech to muzzle1 as that will be preferable to partially doing it4 ,i feel quite satisfied1 and can prove it to demonstration1 that this is undoubtedly the most injurious process to which iron can be subjected2 and ,i believe the prejudice with which the ,london barrel-makers stick to this practice is productive of considerable injury to them3 more especially when we recollect that they are the advocates 7in practice7 of a very inferior quality of ,damascus barrels3 an iron very susceptible of injury4 ,the ,belgian barrels1 and ,french also1 are of good iron2 and ,i fear not contradiction in asserting their inferiority to ,english barrels mostly consists in the foolish practice of brazing them together from end to end4 ,both chemically and mechanically it is a practice for which no valid excuse can be offered4 ,all barrels should have solid ribs for at least eight inches from the breech3 they tend to lessen the vibration of recoil1 as well as to render the barrels more sound and firm4 ,no maker either understands science or studies quality1 who advocates brazing and hollow ribs4 ,the invention of the patent breech was the emanation of a scientific mind2 for it has been productive of more real benefit to the progress of gunnery than any other improvement of the last two centuries4 ,experience and study in the theory of guns and gunpowder1 give the mind a much more enlarged view of the subject1 if regulated by the established laws of true and sound principles3 a want of thorough knowledge induces the individual to draw conclusions prematurely1 and thus he is apt to fall1 and to lead others1 into error4 ,i confess1 that1 together with many hundreds more1 ,i once concluded that the great advantage of the patent breech arose entirely from the loose state in which the powder was preserved while in the breech1 and its thus being more instantaneously ignited4 ,but ,i have already shown that the quickness of powder is1 in a great measure1 the greatest drawback to its efficacy1 and ,i am clearly convinced that compression1 in most instances1 is beneficial1 by retarding the ignition to a certain extent4 ,here1 then1 is proof positive1 that we have been on the wrong scent1 and running after a 8,will o' the ,wisp40 ,illustration ,there is the clearest evidence1 that the only advantage to be derived from any conical form of breech1 does not arise from any peculiarity attached to the ignition of the gunpowder1 but solely from the effect of the angular shape2 conical form being best suited1 or presenting the least direct surface1 to the action of the exploded fluid3 the angles receive the blow and throw it off at the same opposite angle1 and so on1 without receiving any amount of force from the element striking it1 and thus the elastic fluid is enabled to be resisted efficaciously4 ,the cone becomes and forms an artificial solid base1 to a certain extent2 and as such1 it is much more beneficial than the same quantity of powder ignited on a flat surface--as a common plug breech1 for instance2 for here the direct quantity of space on the face of the breech receives the same impulse as the ball projected1 and is acted upon in precisely the same ratio in proportion to their different weights4 ,in a musket of #aa lbs41 the comparative weight of gun and ball is as #a to #agf2 and exactly in that proportion will be the distribution of impulse from the expellant fluid4 ,it thus becomes a plain question between the patent breech and the flat surface of the plug4 ,the two halves of a parabola inverted1 or the shape of a parabolic spindle1 will be the best shape1 according to the laws of science4 ,the representation given on page #bji is as near as ,i can get the engraver to represent my views of the best shape of breech4 ,a great variety of forms have been advocated and puffed2 some of them of the most unscientific description possible3 but it matters not2 for if a zealous advocate could be found to puff well the advantages of the old matchlock1 he would find believers2 so prone are mankind to be deluded by the veriest quackery4 ,the absurdity of exploding gunpowder in a shell at the breech of a gun1 and persisting in the advantage of it1 is certainly tilting at a windmill4 ,it will be asked how it is that ,government do not adopt the patent breech in the musket8 ,i answer1 because of a want of science in the direction1 and an imperfect system of experiments4 ,in fact1 they say they do not find any advantage from the patent breech in a musket3 that the range is as great without it as with it4 ,government never considers the personal comfort of the private soldier1 or it would have long ago used the patent breech for military arms2 for1 setting aside the propellant advantage1 the recoil is 7as near as ,i have been able to ascertain7 under the same circumstances1 as one to two in favour of the angular breech4 ,this is no exaggerated statement3 ,i have tested it1 and will stake my reputation upon its accuracy4 ,but the superior knowledge of projectiles which artillerists have obtained since the extensive introduction of chambers to nearly all descriptions of ordnance1 is the clearest proof1 were any wanting4 ,the use of the ,gomer form of chamber1 is nearly universal in brass guns3 the shape is the frustum of a cone with a spherical bottom4 ,the inutility of enlarging on1 or describing1 the various shapes or plans of breeching1 will be apparent2 my intention being to point out the science of the question1 not the folly of every invention4 ,there have been many good gun-lock makers2 but they have1 ,i fear1 decreased much of late4 ,from the great demand for second-rate goods1 they are rarely called upon to make a first-rate article2 and thus1 from being so little accustomed to make any but inferior locks1 they1 of course1 are out of practice4 ,instead of the manufacture of the best being encouraged1 it is becoming every day more rare to meet with a good one4 ,there is a great degree of skill displayed in the making of locks1 though to the casual observer it is not apparent4 ,on the simple hanging of the swivel depends all the smoothness of the play of the main-spring2 and on the placing the hole for the scear-pin depends the sweetness of the scear playing on the tumbler4 ,many who now pass for excellent workmen would find this a difficult undertaking1 simple as it may seem1 without a pattern by which to work4 ,all locks for percussion should have the greatest strength of mainspring at the moment they strike the nipple1 or as it is termed1 when the lock is down4 ,on the pitching the scear depends the cutting of the bents1 and on their formation1 the danger of the lock catching at half-cock1 when the trigger is made to pull easy2 but these observations will be understood by a lock-maker better than ,i can explain them4 ,the quality of all locks depends on the price they cost filing1 and unless you pay the workman a proper remuneration1 you may rely on having them somewhat inferior1 or in accordance with the price3 but this requires a workman to point out2 so that any person who is not a first-rate judge1 is completely dependent on the honesty of the workman4 ,there is more real science displayed in the construction of a gun-lock than mechanics in general imagine4 ,the placing or hanging of the swivel on the arm of a tumbler1 is an arrangement of leverage partaking of the multiplicate2 as the weight when at full cock1 is lessened by the lever bringing the moving force in the immediate vicinity of the axle1 and when down on the nipple1 increasing or multiplying that force by the divergence4 ,the ,barside lock possesses this advantage to a greater degree than has yet been obtained by any backwork lock yet made2 though ,i perceive no hindrance1 if properly understood and tried3 it is only needful to obtain a greater length of arm1 and a proportionate length of swivel4 ,the family of the ,braziers1 of ,wolverhampton1 have long been celebrated for the goodness of their locks2 which arises solely from the fact that they take more pains1 and will not manufacture any but the best3 for it would be ridiculous to suppose that there are not plenty of men equally as good1 and probably better1 workmen than themselves in the kingdom1 were they properly encouraged1 and confined to making nothing but first-rate articles4 ,the ,braziers have apprentices and journeymen1 and it is preposterous to imagine that they file the tenth part of the locks they furnish to the trade2 but yet they have always1 and deservedly1 obtained a much better price than any other lock-filers out of ,london4 ,several of ,brazier's workmen have of late years commenced manufacturing on their own account1 and now most excellent locks can be had from ,w4 ,evans1 of ,bath-street1 ,birmingham1 who for many years held the first place in ,joseph ,brazier and ,sons' manufactory4 ,the operations of false breeching1 jointing locks1 stocking1 c41 are merely mechanical2 requiring1 certainly1 great skill and ability1 but yet involving no principle further than is contained in the proper suiting of the shape to the make of the user4 ,an endless variety of opinions has always existed1 and always will exist1 as to the description of bend or crook best fitted for rapid shooting1 as flying or running4 ,i have instructed1 and with success1 too1 many young shooters1 who by commencing with a long and straight stock1 have attained a perfection in shooting scarcely to be excelled2 and they never entertain afterwards any wish to change either length or bend4 ,therefore ,i recommend to all beginners to use as long and as straight a stock as they can conveniently bring to the shoulder4 ,all practised shooters have generally so accustomed themselves to one shape1 that it would be prejudicial to change4 ,the practice of throwing off a stock at the butt1 or bending from the hand to the heel-plate1 in a direction to the right1 so that the eye may get more readily in a line with the centre of the breech and the sight1 is a practice not to be defended on scientific principles4 ,the body will suit itself best2 and if the stock be not too straight1 the eye will always find the true line4 ,the percussioning of a gun 7as the fitting-in of nipple1 boring breeches1 filing cocks1 c41 is termed17 is also a mechanical operation1 requiring workmen of the very best abilities4 ,the desideratum to be obtained is nearly a direct communication into the barrel1 and an absence of unnecessary angles1 antechambers1 c42 therefore it is needful that1 in a double gun1 the nipples should be inserted as near the centre of the breeches as they can be conveniently placed1 with the nipples standing1 not upright1 but at an angle of #de2 so that the blow of the cock shall be in or as near a line with the imaginary upright of the nipple as possible4 ,the various plans of copper cap1 copper tubes1 and ,i know not how many other devices1 will be discussed under the head of guns and shooting4 ,finishing the stock1 polishing1 engraving1 hardening1 c41 strictly speaking1 involve no science of consequence1 and as such it is scarcely necessary to occupy the attention of the reader respecting them4 ,the best method of staining barrels is by the following recipe3 but one material fact must not be overlooked4 ,a considerable difficulty exists in staining barrels all steel2 in such a case1 therefore1 the acid should not be so much diluted4 #a oz4 muriate tincture of steel4 #a oz4 spirits of wine4 #a_/d oz4 muriate of mercury4 #a_/d oz4 strong nitric acid4 #a_/h oz4 blue stone4 #a quart of water4 ,these are to be well mixed1 and allowed to stand a month1 to amalgamate4 ,after the oil or grease has been removed from the barrels by lime1 the mixture is laid on lightly with a sponge every two hours4 ,it should be scratched off with a steel-wire brush night and morning1 until the barrels are dark enough2 and then the acid is destroyed by pouring on the barrels boiling water1 and continuing to rub them till nearly cool4 ,the ,birmingham people brown their barrels of inferior quality in the following way1 to make them look equal to the best4 ,they dissolve as much muriate of mercury as can be taken up in a dram-glassful of spirits of wine2 this solution is mixed with one pint of water1 or as much diluted as the person requires4 ,a small quantity of the mixture is poured on a little whitening1 and laid on the barrel with a sponge1 rather lightly2 as soon as dry1 it is brushed off1 and a fresh coat is laid on2 and so on until the barrel is dark enough1 which is generally about two days4 ,the effect that the mercury has on every one of the joints of the fibres is wonderful3 it never fails to make them1 in two or three days at most1 a beautiful brown2 while the other parts1 being harder1 remain1 comparatively speaking1 quite light4 ,the rust is killed by hot water1 but after that1 the barrels are suddenly immersed in cold water2 which has the effect of heightening the brightness of both the colours4 ,the appearance is beautiful1 and equally as fine to the eye as stub-barrels browned in the same way2 though this process is mostly used for the charcoal iron and the threepenny iron barrels4 ,the only method in which there is no deception1 is the smoke brown or stain2 and1 plainly speaking1 this and no other is the reason the gun-makers condemn it4 ,as the acid is decidedly weaker1 and of course less liable to impart injury to the iron1 no barrel can be browned by it1 to look well and fine1 but the best2 or1 in other words1 none save those possessing steel in their composition4 ,the method of staining is this3 the barrels are anointed with a little vitriolic acid1 to cause the iron to receive the effect of the gas more readily2 it is then washed off1 and the barrels rubbed dry4 ,the forge fire must then be lighted1 and blown up with coal possessing as much hydrogen gas and as little sulphur as possible4 ,when the coals are burnt till they give out a clear white flame with no black smoke around it1 the barrels must be passed gradually through that flame backward and forward1 until the whole are covered with a black sooty covering4 ,place them in as damp and cool a cellar as can be procured1 and allow them to stand for eighteen hours2 at that time1 if the place is sufficiently damp1 the iron parts will be found covered with a red rust1 while the particles of steel still retain the original sooty coat4 ,scratch these off with a steel brush1 the same as by any other method of staining2 then take a piece of linen cloth1 and wash or polish the barrels with water and a little washed emery2 when the steel will be found of its original bright colour1 and the iron a shade darker1 with the outlines of both distinctly preserved4 ,rub the barrels dry1 and again pass them through the flame precisely as before2 but above all things be careful not to allow them to remain in the flame till they become hot enough to melt the solder4 ,when you have once passed them through1 do not be in a hurry to pass them again2 but in both be guided by moderation3 neither allow them1 after the first time1 to stand to rust more than twelve hours each time4 ,polish them as before1 and you will find them a shade darker at every smoking4 ,persevere1 until they become as dark as you wish to have them4 ,the utmost you can obtain is a fine purple-black colour on the iron2 and on the steel1 a shade inclined to a copper colour3 but if proper attention be paid to the polishing1 it will not change much from its original colour4 ,the barrels are taken out of stain in the same way as in the other recipes1 by hot water2 but you must continue to scratch or brush them longer1 for by that means you obtain a greater gloss4 ,the principle of this stain is simply thus3 the hydrogen gas contained in the coal acting on the iron 7from being of a softer nature than the steel1 which it does not affect71 and the flame also possessing a quantity of tar1 it is imperceptibly embodied by the iron during the action of the oxide2 and1 when finished1 by filling up the spaces created1 it becomes decidedly more impervious to damp or wet than the other stain1 which is entirely composed of the oxide of iron4 ,the only objection to this brown has been found to arise from the discharge of the black colour from the softer parts of the barrels2 as it being but coal tar1 the sweat of the hand1 hot water in washing1 c41 invariably extract it in a comparatively short time4 ,the recipe1 for the ,birmingham imitations1 is as follows3-- #a oz4 sweet nitre4 #a_/b oz4 tincture of steel4 #a_/d oz4 blue vitriol4 #f drops nitric acid4 #ad grs4 corrosive sublimate4 #a pint of water4 ,when the barrels are dark enough1 drop a few drops of muriatic acid in a basin of water1 and wash the barrel slightly1 to brighten the twists4 ,this last process is borrowed from the ,belgians4 ,in the working of their extremely fine ,damascus barrels1 they found a very great difficulty in staining them so as to produce a clear and distinct figure4 ,the way they now proceed is either to eat away the particles of iron1 leaving the steel prominent and the barrels bright2 or they polish them extremely fine from end to end1 and then blue them in a stove with charcoal4 ,the process is thus described in the notes to a ,german translation1 by ,dr4 ,schmidt1 of ,weimar1 of my last edition of the 8,science of ,gunnery40 8,the method of browning the ,damascus barrels1 which are so much admired in ,england for their distinctness in colour and beauty of figure1 is obtained very simply3 namely1 first burnish the barrels very fine2 then cover them with bone oil2 pound1 or drop1 or strew wood-ashes all over2 then heat them in a cage of wire filled with charcoal1 until you obtain a dark first blue2 after they are cold1 mix a small quantity of sulphuric acid in water 7a quarter of a pint with so many drops72 then take a hard brush and apply it to the barrel1 when the acid will extract the colour from the steel1 leaving the iron with its greater adhesion covered with the blue colour4 ,great care must be used and skill displayed to keep a good colour and not to extract too much40 ,this we cannot do1 because we solder with tin4 ,the 8,belgian ,damascus0 barrels are generally 8eat up10 as it is technically termed4 8,pickled0 is the term also used to describe the process1 which is simply eating away the softer metals from around the steel or harder material4 ,the best preparation for this purpose is #a lb4 of the sulphate of copper 7known as blue vitriol7 dissolved in a gallon of soft water1 at the boiling point1 and continued boiling in an earthenware vessel1 until the quantity is reduced by evaporation #be per cent42 let it cool1 and then pour it into a leaden trough or bath4 ,the barrels1 when properly secured at the muzzle and breech-ends to prevent the liquid getting into the interior1 are immersed therein4 ,the solution will act sufficiently upon the metals in the space of from fifteen to twenty minutes2 care being taken to remove and carefully wash them with cold water1 and then1 after observing the progress of the pickling1 re-immersing them as before1 until the operation is complete4 ,then pour boiling water over them1 and scratch them well with a steel brush1 which will eventually give that beautiful bright 8wavy0 surface much admired by many people4 ,laminated steel barrels also look very well1 after being subjected to this operation4 ,having now detailed as much of the 8modus operandi10 as the patience of the reader will admit1 ,i shall endeavour to give a peep into the 8sanctum sanctorum0 of the gun-makers' workshop4 ,i have shown in detail what course ought to be pursued in the construction of guns of the best quality only2 and before proceeding further shall finish this part of the subject4 ,i am not1 as some would say1 8going to expose the whole secrets of the trade30 oh no1 only a portion4 ,there are six qualities or varieties of mixtures of iron for barrels of best quality4 ,the plate-facing contains two kinds finished1 composed of steel entirely1 but of different degrees of carbonization2 one is composed entirely of a laminated series containing many scores of distinct lamin in the thickness of the sides of the barrels1 twisted and beat into tortuous shapes4 ,the other1 of larger lamin1 but showing the edges of the lamin at an angle with the length1 and thus appearing larger than1 if presenting the side or end of the plates4 ,care must be taken that the great proportion of the fibres shall always run round the tube1 so that the greatest portion of strength may be obtained1 together with a beautiful figure4 ,the cost of this arrangement is considerable1 as it involves a great waste of metal1 and occupies a considerable time to work and re-work--twisting1 faggoting with the bars placed in various forms1 at acute angles to each other1 at right angles1 plaiting three or four rods together1 as a lady does her hair1 cutting these into pieces1 faggoting and welding them into one1 and1 in short1 undergoing an endless routine of manipulations1 which it would be strictly unprofitable to detail1 but are all productive of cost4 ,an ingenious man may work and improve metal of this nature until its cost equals the price of silver2 and1 if judiciously done1 improving it still1 even until he has wasted #ij per cent4 of the original material4 ,the ultimate characteristics and properties of iron have1 as yet1 never been ascertained3 it is capable of being condensed until it becomes nearly1 if not quite1 equal to the specific gravity of silver or lead4 ,no pursuit1 mechanical or philosophical1 presents so great and so beneficial a research1 to the whole civilized and scientific world1 as iron4 ,i could twist and retwist iron1 until1 from the beautiful and interesting results1 it would become with me a sort of monomania4 ,i wonder not at the variety of patterns in a ,damascus sword-blade3 the mind conveys me to the scene1 and a regret arises that ,i did not live in those times2 yet still it is but a mechanical arrangement directed by an ingenious mind1 and the ultimate benefit1 apart from the beauty1 is more than imaginary4 ,however1 it proves that the ,orientals were artists1 and that they were appreciated3 were this the case now with us1 we could do all they ever did1 and more4 ,laminated steel is now a great fact4 ,it is a name stereotyped in ,belgium1 ,germany1 ,france1 and ,america1 as well as in the place of its birth--,england2 and orders come from all quarters of the globe for the celebrated laminated steel4 ,every writer of eminence is loud in its praise1 and justly so too2 for about its merits there is no mistake4 ,no combination of metals ever yet before tried since the birth of gunnery1 can equal it1 either in density1 ductility1 or tenacity4 ,a laminated steel barrel has never been known to burst4 8,reputed0 laminated steel barrels have been burst1 but no real one ever4 ,nor is it probable1 save from malconstruction4 ,through inattention in the welding the best of metal may be burnt2 but the better the iron1 the greater the difficulty4 ,steel is more liable to melt than burn2 so that1 with care and skill on the part of the workman1 it will very seldom indeed occur4 ,but that chance is provided for1 as far as human judgment can do1 in entrusting such barrels only to first-rate and steady workmen4 ,such men are no doubt1 to a certain extent1 scarce2 but they may yet be found3 the ,birmingham welder of proved skill and ability is inferior to none in the world4 ,laminated steel barrels are more scarce than welders4 ,although the various manufacturers of ,europe have complimented me by adopting the name of my invention1 yet ,i am sorry to add it is but in name3 there are very few even tolerable imitations of them4 ,the cost is the 8bugbear30 the name costs nothing1 and can easily be assumed2 but to make laminated steel barrels is quite another matter3 it touches the pocket1 and interferes with the profit2 and it is only in very rare cases indeed--although the order may be explicit as words can make it--that the real article is supplied4 ,there are very few makers in ,birmingham who in reality make 8laminated steel40 ,steel barrels are more plentiful3 they care not so much for the price of the metal2 it is the after repeated manipulations that are evaded3 the labour and loss of material is too much1 and is necessarily 8shirked10 and argument is always met with the answer1 8,we see nothing in it40 ,yet the words 8laminated steel0 are to be found engraved upon barrels of the lowest quality of iron of which double barrels are made4 ,iron twist is subjected to a similar process to that already described as employed in producing ,damascus iron1 and which may be termed common iron ,damascus4 ,thousands of guns are made from this kind of metal1 and yearly sent to the ,united ,states of ,america2 yet all are unblushingly represented as 8laminated steel barrels40 ,the actual price charged for these sort of guns in the ,united ,states ,i know not1 but have no doubt for the whole gun it is about equal to what would be the prime cost of a pair of real laminated steel barrels alone4 ,purchasers should be fully acquainted with the fact that it is impossible to produce laminated steel barrels at a low figure3 labour1 high-priced1 skilled labour1 is always costly2 and talent must be paid for in all parts of the world4 ,the attainment of high class barrels at a low figure1 as a rule1 is an impossibility2 and the maker who would pretend1 promise1 or undertake to make a laminated steel barrelled gun under #ael4 to #bjl4 is an arrant deceiver3 he could never profitably carry out such an intention1 even if he possessed the ability to produce the article4 ,for judgment1 skill1 and ability1 as well as labour1 are required to produce laminated steel barrels4 ,steel alone is not laminated2 and that is another difficulty3 fortunately there are not many persons capable of effecting it4 ,my method of laminating steel is kept as much out of sight as possible1 as a means of self-protection4 ,stub ,damascus is by many makers called 8steel30 both first and second class stub2 and any attempt to reason them out of the absurdity is a hopeless task4 ,many of the highest class makers still doggedly stick to stub ,damascus1 and insinuate underhandedly that the benefit of steel is doubtful3 few do it openly2 but ,i feel sorry to record the fact that prejudice on this point is still rampant4 ,on the superior shooting properties of steel barrels ,i will enlarge in another place4 ,the ,exhibitions have told very beneficially on the future of ,birmingham2 the fact of standing highest in every competition will do 7and has done7 more to remove the prejudice entertained against ,birmingham manufacture than aught beside4 ,sportsmen begin to understand the fact that it is better to order their guns direct from the manufacturer than from the mere salesman1 who can only take his goods on trust1 and warrants without knowing that he can justly do so4 ,any system that would identify the maker with his work would do all that is necessary to emancipate ,birmingham from the stigma which prejudice has entailed upon her name2 and from which ,i hope to see her rise rapidly yet4 ,but ,i do not wish to see her rise on the reputation of ,london3 would that all ,birmingham guns were like those of ,london makers2 or superior to them1 if possible4 ,in addition to the serious evil of producing guns of such great inferiority in material1 and dubbing such barrels 8laminated steel10 a far more serious one is the practice of unscrupulously adding to such guns the names of makers who have spent the majority of their lives in obtaining a name for their manufacture2 thus robbing them indirectly of what is dear to all honest men--reputation4 ,few are judges sufficiently qualified to detect a spurious gun of this description2 and the name thus forged reflects unmerited discredit on a maker who would scorn to allow such an article to leave his manufactory3 but as long as the standard of moral honesty is so low1 both among merchants and manufacturers1 such things will be4 ,men may excuse themselves for affixing the names of men and firms to inferior or worthless guns by the plea of having been ordered to do it by the exporters1 but they are not the less doing a moral wrong1 in thus aiding in a deception which profits them not4 ,but such practices will continue1 until the sense of right and wrong becomes more conscientious1 and trade morality rises to a higher standard than at present4 ,i have every reason to believe1 and have not the least hesitation in stating the fact1 that not only is the epithet 8laminated steel0 added to guns the barrels of which do not contain a particle of steel1 but that a far more serious misrepresentation and injury is perpetrated by affixing the words 8,william ,greener's ,laminated ,steel1 indestructible by ,gunpowder10 to many guns not even of middling fair quality1 but the veriest rubbish ever manufactured4 ,that this is a species of forgery there can be no doubt2 yet the law of this country affords no remedy to effectually prevent and punish the rascality of offering for sale an article fraudulently professing to be what it is not1 to the injury of the purchaser as well as the manufacturer whose good name is thus maligned4 ,forged 8,greener's0 are to be found principally in the ,american markets2 where batches of ten and twelve have been seen in various parts of the ,states1 principally in the hands of 8itinerant merchants40 ,they are1 ,i believe1 pretty plentifully produced in 8,liege10 also2 where1 in fact1 forgeries on all our principal makers are produced4 ,as the law provides no effectual remedy or punishment for such rascality1 ,i now1 in order to lessen it as much as possible1 mark every gun leaving my manufactory with a 8private mark0 in addition to its number2 and on reference to me1 giving a description of the gun purchased 8and its number10 information will be returned of the private mark1 which will stamp the article as real or spurious4 ,if the gun has no number reference is useless1 as ,i number every gun that ,i send out1 and the want is certain proof that it is a forgery4 ,but with a view to lessen the evil as much as can be1 ,i may here say that the best double gun1 with case complete1 that ,i can make will be freely given to any individual who will produce evidence which will enable me to expose all parties concerned in such nefarious dealing1 and justify me in holding them up to public reprobation3 which will be done as certainly as proof can be adduced4 ,there are ample fields of commerce in gunnery yet to be developed1 were articles produced suitable for use1 not for show or deception4 ,inferiority of manufacture combined with deception is the worst course ever adopted by any community4 ,if ,birmingham would repudiate such a course1 and refuse to make worthless articles1 attending more to quality than cheapness1 the gun trade would be more prosperous than it ever has been4 ,time is rapidly realising the recommendations ,i have put forth of the great benefit to be obtained1 not only in steam boilers1 but various other mechanical constructions1 by the use of higher qualities of metals4 ,we have now even 8steel ships0 as well as steel guns1 giving double the strength1 with half the weight2 and if all manufacturers of high class machines adopted the same principles1 an immense saving would be effected in the long run1 from the absence of repairs alone1 in addition to the greater durability of the machine4 ,there ought to be no accidents from the breaking of railway carriage axles3 such an occurrence as the breaking of an axle is an everlasting disgrace2 for axles could be constructed that no known 8fair application0 of strain could possibly break4 ,a simple combination of steel and iron faggoted in segments1 as before described1 and rolled hollow1 would enable axles to last double the time of those at present in use3 #dj1jjj miles travelling is stated to be the maximum distance an axle can be safely trusted2 the destruction being mainly due to the heating in the journals1 or to galvanic action changing the fibrous iron into crystalline in the immediate vicinity of the bearing4 ,axles constructed of different metals1 as steel and iron in conjunction1 would not be so affected2 and might be rendered still less likely to be so by a small hollow in the centre of the axle4 ,but this is a digression2 though ,i may be pardoned for it1 in consideration of the importance of the subject4 ,illustration3 ,,plate4 ,,ii4 ,,damascus ,,barreled ,,gun ,,fancy ,,steel ,,barreled ,,gun ,the opposite plate 7,no4 #b7 represents my mixture in imitation of ,damascus2 the process necessary to produce it1 as well as its companion1 has already been described4 ,these two also come under the head of best barrels1 as they are costly1 and when honestly made 7not plated7 constitute1 with the defects before enumerated1 good barrels4 ,the cost of a really good first-rate gun must and will always vary1 according to the circumstances of manufacture or the peculiar arrangements of the manufacturer4 ,joseph ,manton is entitled to the gratitude1 not only of the present generation of gun-makers1 but of all succeeding ones1 for this reason1--he not only gave a character to ,english guns1 but so linked his name with improvements1 that it will never be forgotten4 ,his was the mind to know and appreciate the value of good workmanship2 he elevated the ,english artisan with himself1 and raised the gunmaker to the acme of mechanical skill3 for1 without invidious comparison of the ability required in other professions1 we may say that a first-rate workman as a gun-maker#aa 7,i mean only a gun-maker7 is one of the very best mechanics ,england can boast of1 or in truth any part of the world4 ,gun-making is the profession of a man of mind3 any man or any workman cannot make a gun1 working by square and rule entirely1 as other mechanics do3 no1 the true gun-maker is an artist1 and ,joe ,manton made him so4 #aa ,barrel welders1 borers1 lock-filers1 c41 are not technically gun-makers3 the latter are those workmen who1 having barrels1 locks1 wood for stock1 c41 make them into a gun4 ,it has been customary to say gunsmiths2 but this appellation can be applied to the worker in iron only4 ,it is true1 we have not now that complex machine1 the flint-lock gun1 in which ,joe so peculiarly excelled2 but we have a more simple and a more efficacious one in the percussion gun4 ,he was not so fortunate in the latter as the former2 but all men are at fault sometimes1 and he could not be expected to fondle the child of another3 no1 it was for the first improvement of the workmanship of the gun1 that his memory must be revered4 ,the ,english gun1 at the outset of his career1 was as far inferior to what he left it1 as the tawdry manufacture of the continent is to ours of the present day4 ,the prices he obtained were enormous certainly2 but all men should be paid well1 who can prove they possess extra brains and ability3 he remunerated his workmen on this scale1 and he unquestionably had the best set the world ever saw4 ,we can1 at this period1 far excel them1 for the pupil sometimes exceeds the tutor2 but this arises from laying firmly the foundation of a superior system4 ,all my ambition has been to be able to make an article that cannot be exceeded in goodness and neatness1 combined with taste1 by the generation in which we live4 ,in proof of this success ,i may mention that the two ,first ,class ,prize ,medals in the ,great ,exhibition of #ahea2 two more in #ahec at ,new ,york2 and1 lastly1 two at ,paris in #ahee1 were awarded to me4 ,the best gun1 or as good a one as ever was constructed1 or ever will be1 should yield the maker a profit at #cel4 ,cheaper it cannot be made1 if it be honestly the best4 ,i have studied and estimated the cost both of town and country-made guns1 and am aware that the ,london maker would be barely remunerated at this rate1 owing to the extra expenses he is liable to4 ,but ,i also know1 without doubt1 that as good guns can be1 and have been1 made in ,birmingham as ever were produced in ,london3 the facilities ,birmingham possesses will always tell in that competition4 ,westley ,richards is an example2 for not much better guns can be manufactured than he produces daily1 as most ,london gun-makers full well know4 ,let but some individual1 with the head and the cash1 try the experiment of making guns himself at ,birmingham1 and a fortune would be the result2 as better workmen1 if well looked after1 cannot be found in the world4 ,but their talents are now prostituted in the production of inferior articles2 and when wanted are1 of course1 amiss for any great effort4 ,birmingham is a workshop where if one tool does not suit you you can get another3 if a barrel be faulty1 or locks inferior1 you can have a new one in the time a ,london house would take in ordering it4 ,these remarks are not dictated by any feeling of dislike to the metropolitan makers1 but from a conviction of their truth4 ,establishments like ,joe ,manton's are not met with in ,london now-a-days--not one house in the business can maintain them4 ,i cannot possibly have any wish to depreciate4 ,what benefit would be gained by it8 ,but ,i cannot praise the ,london manufacturer against conviction2 and ,i am unfortunately too much in the secret3 ,i know too well where and how the vast majority of ,london guns are made4 ,why keep up a distinction that does not exist8 ,why call a gun ,london-made because the seller rents a shop and calls himself a gun-maker8 ,why not at once say1 8,our manufactory is in ,birmingham1 as we find we can make both better and cheaper there40 ,this is truth1 and ought to be told4 ,it is now the extreme of folly to say1 8,these are ,brummagem guns30 that term only applies to the 8rubbish10 the low priced article1 which no honest man has hardihood enough to brand with his own name1 but substitutes that of some deceased member of the fraternity4 ,but when sensible ,london tradesmen so far forget themselves as to designate the produce of a 8brother chip0 as 8only ,birmingham guns10 without ever having seen or examined that work1 ,i feel sensitive on the point2 for though the term is strictly correct1 yet the meaning is slanderous4 ,i have always written and impressed upon sportsmen the imperative necessity of obtaining the very best gun that hands could produce2 ,i urged this sincerely1 and for doing so feel myself entitled to the gratitude of all gunmakers who delight in good work4 ,yet instead of the merit of my work being appreciated1 ,i have unfortunately had to contend with the secret revilings of those who possess not the heart or ability to compete with me4 8,a fair field and no favour0 has ever been my motto2 and1 without egotism1 ,i can safely offer to make a gun or guns against any maker in the world4 ,i do not claim this ability exclusively2 for ,i can name several in ,birmingham1 who1 if they have the price1 will not be far behind4 ,i may fearlessly point to the fact that throughout the whole breadth of ,england every gunmaker is a copyist of my patterns4 ,three months after the opening of the ,paris ,exhibition1 imitations were found in every gun-maker's shop in ,paris1 labelled1 8,fusils de chasse a l',anglais40 ,both the ,belgians and ,french are making vast strides in competition with us4 ,in ,liege they have very recently purchased guns by most of our celebrated makers as models2 and every part of the gun is being imitated to the greatest nicety4 ,i have before alluded to twenty-six of ,westley ,richards' guns1 forgeries1 having been sent to ,london2 in truth they have taken us as a model1 and if we do not keep going ahead1 depend upon it we shall be hard run4 ,in every respectable maker's shop abroad you will find proof of this fact4 ,i brought to ,england several specimens of their productions1 and amongst others a pair of imitation 8,braziers' locks20 these have been shown to many makers in ,birmingham1 and pronounced unanimously a fair pair of locks3 indeed no workman in the kingdom but would have taken them to be of ,english manufacture4 ,in ,paris they carry their imitation1 if possible1 farther still4 ,i saw in ,le ,page's establishment some very good work indeed1 and said so2 remarking that they were very little inferior to our best ,english guns4 8,inferior1 indeed60 said he1 8we consider them quite as good1 ,i assure you30 showing evidently a wish to have them as good4 ,the ,french may excel us in the laudable desire to improve4 ,their periodical ,exposition is a proof of this4 ,we should have our 8,exposition0 also4 ,look at the national importance it would give to our artists in all metals6 how many bright men would then spring into notice6 what an impetus it gives to competition4 ,artists and sculptors exhibit the effects of their genius3 why should not gunmakers also8 ,the highest skill is required in producing a gun3 a first-rate gun is indeed a work of art4 ,why is it not done8 8,self0 is the stumbling-block4 ,the first makers 8par excellence0 do not encourage it1 being jealous of being beaten by some provincial4 ,there wants unanimity1 a co-operative feeling1 both in ,london and ,birmingham4 ,a well-arranged 8,mutual ,improvement ,society0 would be the means of driving the 8rubbish0 out of the market1 and the sordid manufacturer into a reformation of his ways2 it would show him that honesty in his manufactures is as essential as honesty in his outward dealings4 ,i lament that this untoward feeling should exist2 more especially in ,birmingham1 where they possess all the elements for future prosperity3 but these are blighted1 from the want of an expansive1 liberal feeling to each other4 ,i hope to see this state of things attained soon3 the seeds of improvement are taking root4 ,illustration3 ,,plate4 ,,iii4 ,,stub ,,twist ,,barreled ,,gun ,,stub ,,damascus ,,barreled ,,gun ,the plate 7,no4 #c7 opposite represents stub twist and stub ,damascus2 the former1 if properly attended to in manufacture1 will long hold its station in the construction of good guns4 ,an excellent second-rate gun can be made for about #bjl41 with case1 c4 ,at this time there are a great number made at this price3 in fact1 very few cost more2 even those of the best production of ,birmingham4 ,superior articles to any yet produced could be made there1 if occasion demanded it1 and if there were a sufficiency of heads to direct and control4 ,the generality of gunmakers in ,birmingham are merely mechanics1 and when you say this1 all has been said that can be3 a vast majority of excellent workmen have never fired a gun1 and know nothing1 strictly speaking1 of its use4 ,a gunmaker1 in the true meaning of the word1 is1 or ought to be1 an enthusiast2 delighting in1 and living for1 his art alone2 without being clogged with prejudice or with a stubborn mind that refuses to advance1 but animated by a spirit to conceive and realize the emanations of genius4 ,i have already sufficiently enlarged upon the inferiority of barrels made from charcoal iron4 ,a great quantity of these guns are made or got up for the general factors1 who take orders for everything1 from 8a needle to an anchor20 but they manufacture nothing1 and only employ their money for a moderate return4 ,the hardwareman is the principal seller of this description of guns2 he generally pays between eight and ten pounds each for them1 and retails them at from twelve to fourteen pounds1 if he can make his customers believe that they are as good as they can get elsewhere for twenty pounds4 ,i have known a tradesman of this kind sell more guns in a season than three gun-makers in the same town during the same time4 ,a certain portion of the warranty was correct1 8that they were as good as could be got elsewhere for eighteen pounds20 for the articles1 as far as barrels and locks are concerned1 are identically the same4 ,unfortunately1 the generality of gunmakers are content to live like the snail1 who cares not how the world goes1 so long as his house remains whole above his head2 rather than try to improve their productions1 or to meet the exigencies of the times1 they are content to allow the trade to be injured by the influx of worthless articles1 to their own loss and the discredit of the business generally4 ,the enormous prices which gentlemen have been charged for provincial-made guns of the most inferior quality1 has driven them to obtain still worse at a less cost4 ,an honourable and tradesmanlike method of conducting business will always be appreciated1 and if a gun be required at a low figure1 an honestly-made article might be furnished at a price to suit the customer1 and of equal and mutual benefit to buyer and seller4 ,but this will not do3 high prices or no orders is the rule4 ,it would do very well if nothing were manufactured but high-priced articles1 as good in quality as they pretend to be2 but few provincial makers have the means to do this3 an establishment sufficiently large can only be supported in certain districts4 ,i must be excused for making these remarks1 as ,i have both the interest of the maker1 combined with that of the sporting world1 in view1 and have no other end to serve4 ,i do not include all1 only a part of the profession in these strictures1 for there are many honourable exceptions4 ,the ironmonger receives these inferior guns1 and disposes of them as stub-twist barrels3 he knows no other1 nor would he care if he did4 ,a flashy outside is very captivating to the novice2 but one or two years' use will soon show the quality of the article3 the wood then shrinks1 the glue and wax wash out of the fittings1 and an apparently crazy and breaking-up constitution displays itself most clearly3 for work put together at a certain price will have only a certain duration4 ,were ,i free of the gun-making profession entirely1 and asked for my conscientious advice in the purchasing of a gun1 ,i should decidedly say1 buy a gun from no one who has not a character to lose2 who is not only answerable for the article he sells1 but also capable of judging of the quality1 and appreciates the value of good materials4 ,the trade is over-run with swarms of ,jew salesmen and others1 who cannot1 nor ever will be1 able to duly understand and appreciate the responsibility attached to the profession of a gun-maker4 ,there have been individuals in ,birmingham who realised considerable sums by manufacturing guns of this quality only for two or three sale shops of puffing celebrity in ,london1 and so extensive are their orders still1 that an engraver is kept in full employment by them1 the excellence of whose forged imitations of names1 c41 is wonderful3 so devoid of shame and debased in intellect do men become from perseverance in evil4 ,joe ,manton's guns have become like pictures of celebrated masters2 had he produced one per hour during his existence1 he could not have made one-half of the number that bear his name4 ,guns made of threepenny skelp iron are plentifully to be met with in sale-shops and pawnbroking establishments2 they generally bear false colours and hail from fictitious ports1 and are bedecked with painted stocks and tawdry imitation gold and silver ornaments2 but as to the mechanical arrangement1 to use a ,brummagism1 they are as if they had been pitched together4 ,a decent gun could be made with barrels of this quality1 if constructed a little heavier than usual2 and it would be perfectly safe1 and suited for the use of those who could not purchase better3 if firm and soundly fitted up1 with decent locks1 sound stock1 c41 it would be worth about eight guineas2 but you can get them by the hundred in ,birmingham for #cl4 #aes4 each1 and1 if you particularly wish it1 at #bl4 #aes41 or less2 and single guns1 with plated barrels1 about half that sum4 ,we have now reached the utmost limits of civilization1 and are about to pass the great desert1 where science is never seen or heard of1 except it be in the pretences of an inventor of deceptions3 things of wood and iron1 called guns4 ,pocket volcanoes would be a fitter title1 or portable exploders--for no one can possibly expect anything but destruction who uses such compounds of dangerous contrivances4 ,but for the edification of those who use such1 we give the prices of each part and cost of manufacture of them3 the statement is literally true2 and1 except that by possibility the items may vary a penny or two1 the whole is substantially correct4 ,cost of ,material and ,workmen's ,prices for making ,double and ,single ,guns1 with 8,twopenny0 or 8,wednesbury ,skelp ,iron0 ,twist ,barrels4 ,,double ,,guns4 s4 d4 ,double barrels1 twist1 patent breeched #ab #j ,pair of locks #b #j ,wood for stock #j #f ,set of cast furniture #j #e ,stocking #b #j ,screwing together #c #j ,percussioning #b #j ,polishing and engraving #a #j ,varnishing 7including painting7 #j #f ,browning #j #f ,finishing #c #j ,ramrod1 tip1 and worm #j #f ,small work1 nails1 escutcheons1 wood1 screws1 c4 #a #j ---------- #a #h #e ---------- ,,single ,,guns4 s4 d4 ,single barrel1 twist1 c4 #e #i ,lock #a #j ,wood for stock #j #f ,set of cast furniture #d #j ,stocking #a #j ,screwing together #b #j ,percussioning #a #j ,polishing and engraving #j #h ,stock varnishing and painting #j #d ,barrel browning #j #d ,finishing #b #j ,ramrod1 tip1 and worm #j #f ,small work1 c4 #j #h -------- #af #a -------- ,common iron barrels plated with this iron can be furnished by barrel-makers1 double for eight shillings per pair1 single for four shillings each2 which deducted from each1 gives double complete1 #al4 #ds4 #h;d41 and single #ads4 #d;d4 each2 and for these we have known the factor charge the ironmonger1 double3 #cl4 #ajs4 each1 and #al4 #aes4 single2 so it is strictly an imposition on both sides1 one charging #el41 and the other #cl4 ,now for the next3 bad as is the preceding1 this is infinitely worse2 the former costs two-pence per pound1 the present varies from one penny to one penny farthing per pound4 8,sham damn iron0 is similar in nature to brass2 a metal with fibres certainly1 but they are like the fibres of willow compared to oak3 it is an iron soft and spongy1 capable of being condensed to an immense degree4 ,all slave gun-barrels are made of it4 ,mungo ,park detailed some of the lamentable atrocities committed by these guns bursting4 ,the many thousands of mutilated wretches who have lived to curse the cupidity of their fellow-men1 form not a bright side in the picture of human nature2 but were you to bawl into the ears of those employed in the construction1 all these and a thousand more such direful effects of their handiwork1 you would not abate one in the number of these man-traps4 ,cost of ,guns made of ,sham ,damn ,iron4 ,,double ,,guns4 s4 d4 ,double barrels1 plain iron1 with side huts1 per pair #g #j ,locks #a #f ,wood for stock #j #f ,stocking #a #b ,furniture #j #e ,screwing together #b #j ,percussioning #a #d ,polishing and engraving #j #i ,varnishing and painting stock #j #d ,painting twist barrels #j #d ,rod1 tip1 worm #j #d ,small work #j #g -------- ,total #af #j -------- ,,single ,,guns4 s4 d4 ,single barrel1 ribbed and breeched #c #h ,lock #j #i ,wood for stock #j #f ,stocking #j #h ,furniture #j #d ,screwing together #a #d ,percussioning #j #i ,polishing and engraving #j #f ,varnishing and painting stock #j #d ,painting twisted barrel #j #c ,rod1 tip1 worm #j #d ,small work #j #d -------- ,total #aj #i -------- ,the above guns are sold to the factor1 at #bjl4 and #abl4 the score respectively4 ,the ,jews sometimes get even them at that1 or a lower price1 as money happens to be plentiful or scarce4 ,there is a description of tradesmen in this town of hardware1 whose establishments bear the euphonious titles of the 8slaughter shop0 and 8blood house20 and in these emporiums of the productions of the needy2 may be obtained gunnery of all kinds1 as well as all other material1 the productions of ,birmingham4 ,if the article costs little manufacturing1 it costs these men still less4 ,the slaughter-master is a cormorant1 who swallows the substance of the weak1 and once past his awful jaws he cannot be made to disgorge4 ,here itinerant hardwaremen find an abundant supply3 he has always a stock4 ,the wants of the poor are always pressing1 and the gun-making portions of the inhabitants of ,birmingham are not over provident1 seldom caring for what to-morrow may bring forth4 ,the painted pair of shams is faintly portrayed in the opposite engraving 7,plate #d72 and the uninitiated may be able to detect what ,i have endeavoured to acquaint them with4 ,illustration3 ,,plate4 ,,iv4 ,,charcoal ,,iron ,,barreled ,,gun ,,threepenny ,,iron ,,barreled ,,gun ,illustration3 ,,plate4 ,v4 ,,twopenny ,,iron ,,barreled ,,gun ,a ,,sham ,,damn ,,barreled ,,gun ,i shall just give the cost of the various items in the fitting-up of an imitation gun for the ,african market1 combined with an imitation musket for the same2 the former is not so desperately bad as the latter1 the one being barely half an inch in the bore1 the other full three-quarters of an inch1 and yet their weights are not dissimilar4 ,you can have a shipload of these for #es4 #i;d4 each4 ,it is satisfactory to know that they send powder with them of corresponding quality4 ,cost of 8,african guns0 alias 8,park ,paling40 s4 d4 ,common musket barrel1 or birding barrel #b #j ,lock #j #d ,stock #j #d ,stocking #j #e ,brass furniture #j #c-a_/b ,screwing together1 and finishing #j #i ,polishing and hardening1 hammer1 c4 #j #d ,steel rod #j #c ,browning and painting barrel and stock #j #d ,small items #j #c ------------ ,total #e #c-a_/b ------------ ,,chapter ,,vi4 ,,the ,,proof ,,of ,,gun ,,barrels4 ,for a considerable period subsequently to the introduction of the manufacture of gunnery into ,england1 there existed no public proof1 or test1 for the goodness and safety of barrels2 further than that the feeling of the maker induced him to protect the limbs of his customer4 ,even so early as the seventeenth century1 the bias of human nature to evil began to be displayed in the production of materials for guns1 the use of which was attended with loss of both life and limb4 ,in consequence of the frequent bursting of inferior guns1 the ,company of ,gunmakers of the ,city of ,london instituted a proof-house1 to which the barrels of respectable makers were all sent to be proved4 ,the ,east ,india ,company required all their muskets to undergo the same test2 hence it became a custom to have barrels proved there3 many also underwent an extra test on the premises of the manufacturer2 so jealous were sportsmen1 and so necessary was it deemed to provide against any possibility of accident4 ,thus it was shown clearly that laws are not always required to carry out certain results1 but that it is sometimes preferable to allow matters of this kind to be arranged according to the knowledge of the parties interested2 for frequently when an individual is aware that there is a law under which1 in case of need1 he can shelter himself--as many do at this day in case of guns bursting--he becomes careless3 he has always a ready answer1 8,i can assure you the barrel was proved2 and there must have been some unfortunate cause for her going3 you could not have rammed the wadding home1 or you must have put in an extra charge10 and such like excuses4 ,it is never for a moment supposed that there was any insufficiency in the proof4 ,the great demand for rubbish of a villanous description during the existence of the slave trade1 induced some philanthropic gentlemen in ,birmingham to found a ,company1 with suitable premises1 for the proof of all gun barrels2 and an ,act of ,parliament was obtained in the year #ahac1 incorporating the body4 ,the first ,act proved insufficient1 as the ,birmingham makers found easy means of evading it2 so they had to obtain a fresh ,act in #ahae1 by which parties receiving any barrel to rib1 stock1 c41 without its having previously been proved1 became liable to a penalty of twenty pounds1 and not less than twenty shillings3 it also enacted that any person or persons making and selling any gun1 the barrels of which had not been proved at either this or the ,london proof-house1 became liable to the same penalty2 and it further enacted1 that any person or persons forging the stamps or marks of either of the two proof-houses1 should be liable to the same penalties1 and in default of payment1 to a certain term of imprisonment1 c4 ,it also ordered1 that all barrels be proved with the quantity of powder in proportion to the various bores enumerated in the table4 ,the severe1 but just1 strictures cast upon the lax nature of this ,act of ,parliament1 and the equally lax way in which its provisions were carried out 7individual benefit being held to be the most important element in the interpretation71 imperatively called for an immediate improvement4 ,the heavy denunciations which ,i felt bound to visit on the defective working of this 8miscalled proof of gun barrels0 in my former works1 at length opened the eyes1 not only of the sportsman and the trade1 but also of the ,government2 and 7,i believe in #ahed7 it was intimated to the proof companies of ,london and ,birmingham that the time had arrived 8when gun barrels should be proved in reality20 and that if the initiative was not taken by the trade1 the ,government were prepared to introduce a public ,act of ,parliament for that purpose4 ,the natural consequence followed1 and in #ahee an ,act was passed entitled 8,the ,gun ,barrel ,proof ,act #ahee10 by which most extensive powers are delegated to the two companies4 ,the clause of most vital importance enacts that all gun barrels shall be proved twice2 first in the rough1 which is called provisional proof2 and secondly1 when the barrels are soldered together1 breeched1 and percussioned4 ,thus1 in a comparatively finished state1 when all the necessary reductions and other operations have been effected1 the barrels become properly tested4 ,not only the metal of the barrels and the soundness of the breeches1 but the screwing in of the nipples is proved--a most important check on a very important branch of workmanship1 and which if imperfectly done renders the gun dangerous4 ,the first regulation enacts that 8barrels are not to be made up unless proved1 and marked as proved40 #bnd4 ,small arms are not to be sold or exported unless proved1 and marked as proved4 #crd4 ,barrels provisionally proved and reduced in strength are to be deemed unproved4 #dth4 ,barrels reduced so that the mark does not represent the proof are to be deemed unproved4 #eth4 ,barrels with marks defaced are to be deemed unproved4 #fth4 ,barrels with marks removed are to be deemed unproved4 #gth4 ,barrels are to be marked according to scale4 ,here follows a list of offences3-- ,,xcix4 ,every person committing any of the following offences shall for every such offence be guilty of a misdemeanour1 and shall at the discretion of the court be sentenced to imprisonment1 with or without hard labour1 for not more than three years1 to wit3 #a4 ,every person who forges or counterfeits any stamp or any part of any stamp already or hereafter provided or used by either of the two companies for the marking of any barrel3 #b4 ,every person who sells or parts with the possession of any such forged or counterfeit stamp or part of a stamp1 knowing the same to be forged or counterfeit3 #c4 ,every person who knowingly marks any barrel with any such forged or counterfeit stamp or with any part of such forged or counterfeit stamp3 #d4 ,every person who makes up any barrel so marked1 knowing the same to be so marked3 #e4 ,every person who sells or parts with the possession of any barrel so marked1 knowing the same to be so marked3 #f4 ,every person who forges or counterfeits or by any means whatever produces an imitation upon any barrel of any mark or of any part of any mark of any stamp already or hereafter provided or used by either of the two companies for the marking of any barrel3 #g4 ,every person who sells or parts with the possession of any such mark or part of a mark1 knowing the same to be forged or counterfeit or an imitation3 #h4 ,every person who transposes or removes from any barrel to any other barrel any mark or any part of any mark of any stamp already or hereafter provided or used by either of the two companies for making any barrel3 #i4 ,every person who shall have in his possession or who shall part with the possession of any mark or any part of any mark so transposed or removed1 knowing the same to be transposed or removed3 #aj4 ,every person without lawful excuse1 the proof whereof shall lie on him1 having in his possession any such forged or counterfeit stamp or part of a stamp1 or any such forged or counterfeit mark or imitation of a mark1 or any such transposed or removed mark1 knowing the same respectively to be forged1 counterfeit1 imitated1 marked1 transposed1 or removed3 #aa4 ,every person who cuts or severs from any barrel any mark or any part of any mark of any stamp already or hereafter provided or used by either of the two companies for the stamping of any barrel1 with intent that such mark or such part of a mark be placed upon or joined or affixed to any other barrel3 #ab4 ,every person who places upon or joins or affixes to any barrel any such mark or part of a mark so cut or severed3 #ac4 ,every person who1 with intent to defraud1 uses any genuine stamp already or hereafter provided or used by either of the two companies for the marking of any barrel3 #ad4 ,every person who forges or counterfeits1 or by any means produces an imitation upon any barrel of any mark1 or of any part of any mark1 of any stamp of a foreign country registered by the two companies pursuant to the provisions of this ,act4 ,c4 ,every person committing any of the following offences shall for every such offence be subject to a penalty as follows1 to wit3 #a4 ,every person selling or exchanging1 or exposing or keeping for sale1 or exporting or importing1 or attempting to export or import from or to ,england1 or having in his possession without lawful excuse 7the proof whereof shall lie upon him71 any barrel having thereupon any mark of any forged or counterfeit stamp or part of a stamp already or hereafter provided or used by either of the two companies for marking any barrel1 or having thereupon any forged or counterfeit mark or imitation of a mark of any stamp or part of a stamp so provided or used1 or having thereupon any mark of any stamp or part of a stamp so provided or used1 such mark having been transposed or removed thereto from any other barrel1 shall for every such barrel so sold or exchanged1 or exposed or kept for sale1 or exported or imported1 or attempted to be exported or imported1 or so in his possession1 forfeit not exceeding twenty pounds3 #b4 ,every person selling or exchanging or exposing or keeping for sale1 or exporting or attempting to export from ,england1 any small arm1 the barrel or barrels whereof are not under this ,act duly proved and marked as proved1 shall for every such barrel forfeit not exceeding twenty pounds3 #c4 ,every person fraudulently erasing1 obliterating1 or defacing1 or fraudulently causing to be erased1 obliterated1 or defaced from any barrel1 any mark or any part of any mark of any stamp already or hereafter provided or used by either of the two companies for the marking of barrels1 shall for every such offence forfeit not exceeding twenty pounds3 #d4 ,every person delivering or sending or causing or procuring to be delivered or sent for sale1 or under pretence of sale1 or removing1 consigning1 or transmitting1 or causing or procuring to be removed1 consigned1 or transmitted for sale1 or under pretence of sale1 any small arm1 the barrel or barrels whereof are not duly proved at the ,proof-house of the ,gunmakers' ,company1 or the ,birmingham ,proof-house1 or some other public proof-house established by law1 and marked as proved1 shall1 for every small arm so delivered or sent1 or caused or procured to be delivered or sent1 or removed1 consigned1 or transmitted1 or caused or procured to be removed1 consigned1 or transmitted1 forfeit not exceeding twenty pounds4 ,the preceding list of offences against the proper conducting of the gun manufacture have been found1 after nearly three years' experience1 to fulfil the intentions of the framers#ab of the bill4 ,undoubtedly a much more healthy tone has been given to the constitution of the trade2 and it is to be fervently hoped that it will entirely eradicate the evil of producing such a vast amount of worthless and dangerous guns4 ,the double-proof has been too much for many of the 8sham damns40 ,no doubt much remains to be done even yet2 but the trade is progressing towards convalescence1 after this severe purging4 ,with these remarks ,i shall introduce schedule ,b of the new ,act4 #ab ,i had the honour of being one of a committee to frame the clauses4 ,,schedule 7,b47 ,,rules ,,and ,,regulations ,,applicable ,,to ,,the ,,proof ,,of ,,small ,,arms4 ,classification of ,small ,arms4 ,first ,class4--,comprising single-barrelled military arms of smooth bore4 ,second ,class4--,comprising double-barrelled military arms of smooth bore1 and rifled arms of every description1 whether of one or more barrels1 or constructed of plain or twisted iron4 ,third ,class4--,comprising every description of single-barrelled birding and fowling-pieces for firing small shot2 and also those known by the names of ,danish1 ,dutch1 ,carolina1 and ,spanish4 ,fourth ,class4--,comprising every description of double-barrelled birding and fowling-pieces for firing small shot4 ,fifth ,class4--,comprising revolving and breech-loading small arms of every description and system4 ,rule of ,proof4 ,the gunpowder used for proof shall be of equal quality and strength with that which is now used by the ,honourable ,board of ,ordnance4 ,the balls used for the proof of barrels of all classes shall be of lead1 and spherical1 and of the size and weight prescribed by the scale for proof4 ,barrels for arms of the second class and of the fourth class1 and for breech-loading arms of the fifth class1 shall be proved provisionally and definitively1 and barrels for all other arms shall be proved once definitively4 ,conditions precedent to ,proof4 ,barrels for arms of the first class shall not be qualified for proof until they shall be in a fit and proper state for setting up4 ,barrels for arms of the third class shall not be qualified for proof until they shall be in a fit and proper state for setting up1 with the proper breeches in2 and all barrels lumped for percussioning shall be proved through the nipple hole1 with the proper pins or plugs in4 ,barrels for arms of the second and fourth classes3 ,for provisional proof3--,if of plain metal1 shall be bored and ground1 having plugs attached1 with touch-holes drilled in the plugs1 of a diameter not exceeding one-sixteenth of an inch4 ,if any touch-hole shall be enlarged1 from any cause whatever1 to a dimension exceeding in diameter one-tenth of an inch1 the barrel shall be disqualified for proof4 ,notches in the plugs instead of drilled touch-holes shall disqualify for proof4 ,if of twisted metal1 they shall be fine-bored1 and struck up1 with proving plugs attached1 and touch-holes drilled as in the case of plain metal barrels4 ,for definitive proof3--,the barrels1 whether of plain or twisted metal1 shall be in the finished state1 ready for setting up1 with the breeches in the percussioned state1 break-offs fitted and locks jointed2 the top and bottom ribs shall be rough struck up1 pipes1 loops1 and stoppers on4 ,all rifle barrels must be rifled2 the top and bottom ribs of double barrels shall be struck up1 pipes1 loops1 and stoppers on1 the proper breeches in1 and the thread of the screws shall be sufficiently sound and full for proof4 ,barrels for revolving arms of the fifth class shall have the cylinders with the revolving action attached and complete4 ,barrels for breech-loading arms of the fifth class shall be subject to provisional proof1 according to the class to which they belong1 and to definitive proof when the breech-loading action is attached and complete4 ,marks of ,proof4 ,the marks applicable to the definitive proof shall be the proof and view marks now used by the two companies respectively4 ,the marks applicable to the provisional proof for the ,gunmakers ,company shall be the letters 7,g4,p47 interlaced in a cypher surmounted by a lion rampant1 and for the ,birmingham ,company shall be the letters 7,b4,p47 interlaced in a cypher surmounted by a ,crown4 ,illustration3 ,london marks4 ,illustration3 ,birmingham marks4 ,mode of affixing ,proof ,marks4 ,on arms of the first and third classes the definitive proof mark and view mark shall be impressed at the breech end of the barrel1 and if the barrel be constructed with a patent breech1 the view mark shall be also impressed upon the breech4 ,on arms of the second1 fourth1 and fifth classes1 the provisional proof mark shall be impressed at the breech end of the barrel2 the definitive proof mark and view mark shall be impressed upon the barrel above the provisional proof mark2 and if the barrel be constructed with a patent breech1 or with revolving cylinders or chambers1 the view mark shall be also impressed upon the breech1 or upon each of the cylinders or chambers with which the barrel is connected1 as the case may be4 ,on all barrels the gauge size of the barrel shall be struck1 both at the provisional and at the definitive proof4 ,scale for ,proof4 ,the ,scale following shows the ,proportions of ,gunpowder applicable under the foregoing ,rules and ,regulations to the ,proof of the various ,classes of ,arms as distinguished by the ,trade ,numbers indicating the ,calibre4 ---------------------------------------- ----------------- ,charges of ,powder ,number ,diameter ,diameter ,weight of for ,proof4 of of ,bore by of ,balls for,balls for------------------ ,gauge4,calculation4 ,proof4 ,proof4 ,first ,class4 ------------------ ,definitive ,proof4 ---------------------------------------- ----------------- inches4 inches4 grains4 grains4 ozs4 drs4 #a #affi #afdi #fgeb #dhab #aa 444 #b #acbe #acje #ccdb #bcbd #e #e #c #aaeg #aajg #bbaa #aeca #c #h #d #ajeb #ajcb #afdi #aagf #b #aa #e #igf #ief #acae #icj #b #b #f #hai #hii #ajij #gff #a #ab #g #hgc #hec #ica #fef #a #h #h #hce #hae #hab #fjb #a #f #i #hjc #ghc #gbj #dib #a #b #aj #gge #gee #fdf #dfe #a #a #aa #gea #gca #ehf #dcg 444 #af #ab #gbi #gji #ece #dcg 444 #af #ac #gaj #fij #dic #daj 444 #ae #ad #fic #fgc #deg #chc 444 #ad #ae #fgg #feg #dbe #chc 444 #ad #af #ffb #fdb #cii #cfi 444 #ac-a_/b #ag #fdi #fbi #cgd #cfi 444 #ac-a_/b #ah #fcg #fag #ceb #cdb 444 #ab-a_/b #ai #fbf #fjf #ccd #cja 444 #aa #bj #fae #eie #caf #bgc 444 #aj #ba #fje #ehe #cjj #bgc 444 #aj #bb #eif #egf #bhg #bdf 444 #i #bc #ehg #efg #bgd #bdf 444 #i #bd #egi #eei #bfb #bcb 444 #h-a_/b #be #ega #eea #bea #bcb 444 #h-a_/b #bf #efc #edc #bdb #bcb 444 #h-a_/b #bg #eef #ecf #bca #bcb 444 #h-a_/b #bh #eej #ecj #bbc #bcb 444 #h-a_/b #bi #edc #ebc #bad #bje 444 #g-a_/b #cj #ecg #eag #bjg #bje 444 #g-a_/b #ca #eca #eaa --- #bje 444 #g-a_/b #cb #ebf #ejf #aid #bje 444 #g-a_/b #cc #ebj #ejj --- #aia 444 #g #cd #eae #die #ahb #aia 444 #g #ce #eaj #dij --- #aia 444 #g #cf #ejf #dhf #agb #aia 444 #g #cg #eja #dha --- #aia 444 #g #ch #dig #dgg #afb #agh 444 #f-a_/b #ci #dib #dgb --- #agh 444 #f-a_/b #dj #dhh #dfh #aed #agh 444 #f-a_/b #da #dhd #dfd --- #afd 444 #f #db #dhj #dfj #adf #afd 444 #f #dc #dgf #def --- #afd 444 #f #dd #dgc #dec #aci #afd 444 #f #de #dfi #ddi --- #aej 444 #e-a_/b #df #dff #ddf #acc #aej 444 #e-a_/b #dg #dfc #ddc --- #aej 444 #e-a_/b #dh #dei #dci #abg #aej 444 #e-a_/b #di #def #dcf --- #aej 444 #e-a_/b #ej #dec #dcc #abb #aej 444 #e-a_/b ---------------------------------------- ----------------- ---------------------------------------- ----------------------- ,charges of ,powder for ,proof4 ,number--------------------------------- ---------------------- of ,second ,class4 ,third ,class4 ,gauge4--------------------------------- --------------------- ,provisional ,proof4 ,definitive ,proof4 ,definitive ,proof4 ---------------------------------------- -------------------- grains4 ozs4 drs4 grains4 ozs4 drs4 grains4 ozs4 drs4 #a #dhab #aa 444 #bdjf #e #h #chej #h #ab-c_/d #b #bcbd #e #e #aafb #b #aj-a_/b #ahei #d #d #c #aeca #c #h #gff #a #ab #abbe #b #ab-c_/d #d #aagf #b #aa #ehh #a #e-a_/b #ida #b #b-a_/b #e #icj #b #b #dfe #a #a #gdd #a #aa-a_/d #f #gff #a #ab #chc 444 #ad #fab #a #f-a_/b #g #fef #a #h #cbh 444 #ab #ebe #a #c-a_/d #h #fjb #a #f #cja 444 #aa #dha #a #a-a_/b #i #dib #a #b #bdf 444 #i #cid 444 #ad-a_/b #aj #dfe #a #a #bcb 444 #h-a_/b #cgb 444 #ac-a_/b #aa #dcg 444 #af #bai 444 #h #cej 444 #ab-c_/d #ab #dcg 444 #af #bai 444 #h #cej 444 #ab-c_/d #ac #daj 444 #ae #bje 444 #g-a_/b #cbh 444 #ab #ad #chc 444 #ad #aia 444 #g #cjf 444 #aa-a_/d #ae #chc 444 #ad #aia 444 #g #cjf 444 #aa-a_/d #af #cfi 444 #ac-a_/b #ahe 444 #f-c_/d #bie 444 #aj-c_/d #ag #cfi 444 #ac-a_/b #ahe 444 #f-c_/d #bie 444 #aj-c_/d #ah #cdb 444 #ab-a_/b #aga 444 #f-a_/d #bgc 444 #aj #ai #cja 444 #aa #aej 444 #e-a_/b #bda 444 #h-c_/d #bj #bgc 444 #aj #acg 444 #e #bai 444 #h #ba #bgc 444 #aj #acg 444 #e #bai 444 #h #bb #bdf 444 #i #abc 444 #d-a_/b #aig 444 #g-a_/d #bc #bdf 444 #i #abc 444 #d-a_/b #aig 444 #g-a_/d #bd #bcb 444 #h-a_/b #aaf 444 #d-a_/d #ahf 444 #f-c_/d #be #bcb 444 #h-a_/b #aaf 444 #d-a_/d #ahf 444 #f-c_/d #bf #bcb 444 #h-a_/b #aaf 444 #d-a_/d #ahf 444 #f-c_/d #bg #bcb 444 #h-a_/b #aaf 444 #d-a_/d #ahf 444 #f-c_/d #bh #bcb 444 #h-a_/b #aaf 444 #d-a_/d #ahf 444 #f-c_/d #bi #bje 444 #g-a_/b #ajb 444 #c-c_/d #afd 444 #f #cj #bje 444 #g-a_/b #ajb 444 #c-c_/d #afd 444 #f #ca #bje 444 #g-a_/b #ajb 444 #c-c_/d #afd 444 #f #cb #bje 444 #g-a_/b #ajb 444 #c-c_/d #afd 444 #f #cc #aia 444 #g #if 444 #c-a_/b #aec 444 #e-a_/b #cd #aia 444 #g #if 444 #c-a_/b #aec 444 #e-a_/b #ce #aia 444 #g #if 444 #c-a_/b #aec 444 #e-a_/b #cf #aia 444 #g #if 444 #c-a_/b #aec 444 #e-a_/b #cg #aia 444 #g #if 444 #c-a_/b #aec 444 #e-a_/b #ch #agh 444 #f-a_/b #hi 444 #c-a_/d #adb 444 #e-a_/d #ci #agh 444 #f-a_/b #hi 444 #c-a_/d #adb 444 #e-a_/d #dj #agh 444 #f-a_/b #hi 444 #c-a_/d #adb 444 #e-a_/d #da #afd 444 #f #hb 444 #c #aca 444 #d-c_/d #db #afd 444 #f #hb 444 #c #aca 444 #d-c_/d #dc #afd 444 #f #hb 444 #c #aca 444 #d-c_/d #dd #afd 444 #f #hb 444 #c #aca 444 #d-c_/d #de #aej 444 #e-a_/b #ge 444 #b-c_/d #abj 444 #d-a_/b #df #aej 444 #e-a_/b #ge 444 #b-c_/d #abj 444 #d-a_/b #dg #aej 444 #e-a_/b #ge 444 #b-c_/d #abj 444 #d-a_/b #dh #aej 444 #e-a_/b #ge 444 #b-c_/d #abj 444 #d-a_/b #di #aej 444 #e-a_/b #ge 444 #b-c_/d #abj 444 #d-a_/b #ej #aej 444 #e-a_/b #ge 444 #b-c_/d #abj 444 #d-a_/b ---------------------------------------- -------------------- ---------------------------------------- --- ,charges of ,powder for ,proof4 ,number--------------------------------- ---- of ,fourth ,class4 ,gauge4--------------------------------- --- ,provisional ,proof4 ,definitive ,proof4 ---------------------------------------- -- grains4 ozs4 drs4 grains4 ozs4 drs4 #a #chej #h #ab-c_/d #bdjf #e #h #b #ahei #d #d #aafb #b #aj-a_/b #c #abbe #b #ab-c_/d #gff #a #ab #d #ida #b #b-a_/b #ehh #a #e-a_/b #e #gdd #a #aa-a_/d #dfe #a #a #f #fab #a #f-a_/b #chc 444 #ad #g #ebe #a #c-a_/d #cbh 444 #ab #h #dha #a #a-a_/b #cja 444 #aa #i #cid 444 #ad-a_/b #bdf 444 #i #aj #cgb 444 #ac-a_/b #bcb 444 #h-a_/b #aa #cej 444 #ab-c_/d #bai 444 #h #ab #cej 444 #ab-c_/d #bai 444 #h #ac #cbh 444 #ab #bje 444 #g-a_/b #ad #cjf 444 #aa-a_/d #aia 444 #g #ae #cjf 444 #aa-a_/d #aia 444 #g #af #bie 444 #aj-c_/d #ahe 444 #f-c_/d #ag #bie 444 #aj-c_/d #ahe 444 #f-c_/d #ah #bgc 444 #aj #aga 444 #f-a_/d #ai #bda 444 #h-c_/d #aej 444 #e-a_/b #bj #bai 444 #h #acg 444 #e #ba #bai 444 #h #acg 444 #e #bb #aig 444 #g-a_/d #abc 444 #d-a_/b #bc #aig 444 #g-a_/d #abc 444 #d-a_/b #bd #ahf 444 #f-c_/d #aaf 444 #d-a_/d #be #ahf 444 #f-c_/d #aaf 444 #d-a_/d #bf #ahf 444 #f-c_/d #aaf 444 #d-a_/d #bg #ahf 444 #f-c_/d #aaf 444 #d-a_/d #bh #ahf 444 #f-c_/d #aaf 444 #d-a_/d #bi #afd 444 #f #ajb 444 #c-c_/d #cj #afd 444 #f #ajb 444 #c-c_/d #ca #afd 444 #f #ajb 444 #c-c_/d #cb #afd 444 #f #ajb 444 #c-c_/d #cc #aec 444 #e-a_/b #if 444 #c-a_/b #cd #aec 444 #e-a_/b #if 444 #c-a_/b #ce #aec 444 #e-a_/b #if 444 #c-a_/b #cf #aec 444 #e-a_/b #if 444 #c-a_/b #cg #aec 444 #e-a_/b #if 444 #c-a_/b #ch #adb 444 #e-a_/d #hi 444 #c-a_/d #ci #adb 444 #e-a_/d #hi 444 #c-a_/d #dj #adb 444 #e-a_/d #hi 444 #c-a_/d #da #aca 444 #d-c_/d #hb 444 #c #db #aca 444 #d-c_/d #hb 444 #c #dc #aca 444 #d-c_/d #hb 444 #c #dd #aca 444 #d-c_/d #hb 444 #c #de #abj 444 #d-a_/b #ge 444 #b-c_/d #df #abj 444 #d-a_/b #ge 444 #b-c_/d #dg #abj 444 #d-a_/b #ge 444 #b-c_/d #dh #abj 444 #d-a_/b #ge 444 #b-c_/d #di #abj 444 #d-a_/b #ge 444 #b-c_/d #ej #abj 444 #d-a_/b #ge 444 #b-c_/d ---------------------------------------- -- ,n4,b4--,revolving ,arms of the ,fifth ,class shall be proved once only1 and such ,proof shall be by the ,scale laid down for definitive ,proof of the ,fourth ,class4 ,illustration ,as soon as a number of gun barrels are loaded according to the foregoing scale1 they are taken to a house or detached building1 standing apart from other offices4 7,the woodcut represents the interior accurately47 ,the house is lined throughout with thick sheet iron1 and the windows1 which resemble ,venetian blinds1 are constructed of the same metal4 ,iron frames are laid the whole length of the room2 on these the barrels of various qualities1 when about to be fired1 are placed4 ,in the front of these frames lies a large mass of sand1 to receive the balls4 ,behind the frame1 on which the twist barrels are fixed1 lies another bed of sand2 in which1 on the recoil1 the barrels are buried4 ,behind the frame1 on which the common barrels or muskets are tried1 a strong iron bar is placed1 having a number of holes large enough to receive the tang of the breech1 but not the barrel4 ,the barrels being thus fixed1 it is impossible for them to fly back4 ,a groove runs along the whole length of each frame1 in which the train of powder is strewed to ignite the charges1 upon which the barrels are laid1 with the touch-holes downwards4 ,when everything is ready for the proof1 the windows are let close down1 the door is shut and secured1 and an iron rod heated red hot is introduced through a hole in the wall4 ,on igniting the train1 a tremendous explosion takes place4 ,the windows are then drawn up1 the door opened1 and the smoke dissipated4 ,the twist barrels are found buried in the sand1 the common ones are thrown forwards2 some are found perfect1 others burst to pieces4 ,it is rarely that best barrels are found burst2 more frequently they are bulged1 or swelled out1 in places which are faulty1 or of a softer temper4 ,those that are found perfect1 are then marked with the provisional punch of different sizes 7but having the same impression71 according to the quality of the barrel4 ,in ,london and ,birmingham they have now an additional punch1 containing the number of the bore by which the barrel has been tried4 ,this mark easily enables the observer to discover whether the barrel has had any considerable quantity bored out after proving4 ,those that are bulged are sent to the maker1 who beats down the swellings1 and sends back the barrels to be proved again4 ,they generally stand the second proof1 though we have known a barrel undergo four proofs before it was marked4 ,the common barrels are required to stand twenty-four hours before they are examined2 when1 if not burst1 any holes or other material imperfections are made quite apparent by the action of the saltpetre4 ,such barrels are1 of course1 sent back unmarked4 ,those that are found satisfactory are duly stamped and taken home4 ,the importance of the gun trade to ,england may be estimated from the number of barrels proved during the last year1 #aheg1 of which the following is a correct statement3-- ,provisional ,proof4 ,plain iron barrels #ahe1ggf ,twisted barrels #acf1hjd ,saddle pistol barrels #cc1dhj ,best pistol barrels #ifb ,common pistol barrels #b1jff ,revolving and double barrel pistols #eg1ajf ------- ,total #daf1aid ,definitively proved1 #gj1ajj1 being principally double barrels4 ,this is in ,birmingham alone2 no doubt the ,london ,company prove to the extent of #bjj1jjj yearly1 which may also be debited to ,birmingham1 as the barrels are all welded1 bored1 and ground before being sent to ,london4 ,in addition to these may be counted the ,government contracts of some hundred thousands yearly4 ,the passing of this ,act of ,parliament levelled all distinctions between ,london and ,birmingham proved barrels2 they are now treated precisely alike1 and one is equally good with the other4 ,,chapter ,,vii4 ,,the ,,science ,,of ,,gunnery4 8,science begins at the point where mind dominates matter1 where the attempt is made to subject the mass of experience to the scrutiny of reason4 ,science is mind brought into connection with nature40--,,cosmos4 ,a new era in the science of gunnery may be dated from the commencement of the latter half of the nineteenth century2 and long before its close other improvements may be effected which shall eclipse even those of our day4 ,a new elementary principle has been infused into the science4 ,rifles are now really weapons of the highest order2 in truth we may be said to have only recently become acquainted with the principles on which they should be constructed4 ,little of science had hitherto been applied to them2 as military arms they were neglected for centuries1 to be ushered into notice at last by the unassisted efforts of private individuals2 ,government1 to whom arms were of the greatest importance1 having systematically neglected all improvement1 by invariably refusing pecuniary aid1 the only grease at all calculated to overcome the friction retarding the wheels of progress4 ,it is an old proverb1 that 8one extreme begets another10 and when changes are once started1 the difficulty is to stop them2 the tendency is to rush on from one alteration to another1 before we are really well acquainted with what we have so hastily thrown aside4 ,improvement does not always follow a change2 the human race1 and the ,english more especially1 have an inordinate desire for 8the marvellous20 and multitudes of 8wonderful discoveries0 and inventions of the utmost value are heralded daily by the ever eager press1 often to be as hastily forgotten1 or discovered1 even by their promulgators1 to be myths4 ,improvement1 to be at all beneficial1 must bring with it all the elements of improvement2 and to render it easy of attainment1 none of its essential points should be costly4 ,in gunnery more especially1 it is essential to avoid all unnecessary friction1 excess of recoil1 and waste of gunpowder2 whilst1 at the same time1 transport of the gun must not be cumbersome1 and durability in all its points is essential4 ,how few study the subject in all its bearings6 ,how rapidly conclusions are jumped at6 ,even in getting range1 if it is to be purchased at the cost of other essential principles1 it is not economy to sacrifice several even moderately valuable principles for the sake of range alone4 ,the experience of the present age has shown that all our important discoveries have their limits3 the locomotive cannot be used with advantage beyond a certain limited speed2 steam vessels attempted to be propelled at an unusual velocity have but a very brief endurance1 and rapidly decay4 ,all matter has power only to effect a certain amount of work1 and this is endured best at a medium application2 showing most clearly that 8the race is not always to the swift or the battle to the strong40 ,experience is required in the greatest of modern inventions4 ,electricity1 at a moderate immersion1 subjected to a moderate superincumbent weight1 is an effectual messenger1 swift as thought2 but when overweighted by immersion to depths where the superincumbent pressure amounts to thousands of pounds upon the square inch1 then the messenger becomes paralysed1 and refuses to obey man's will2 showing very clearly that until that pressure be artificially removed by insulating the conducting wire in tubes equal to restrain or keep from it that enormous load1 the lasting success of an ,atlantic telegraph is very doubtful4 ,many similar instances might be cited to show the necessity of considering well the established laws of nature1 and their bearing on the object pursued4 ,in no science is this of more importance than in gunnery2 and the hundreds of useless inventions in gunnery are to be ascribed to the non-observance of these rules4 ,the two-grooved rifle1 the 8steam gun10 8the sciva10 8,warner's long-range myth10 and many other inventions equally absurd1 engage the attention for a time1 but soon vanish3 in fact1 all experience shows that improvement can only be effected in accordance with certain established principles of nature and practical science4 ,iron1 in quantities sufficient for all reasonable requirements1 is a dutiful servant2 but1 when required of colossal proportions1 it refuses to obey3 giving us a hint from nature1 that we should be content with moderation4 ,all the principles appertaining to science are based on certain established laws2 the unsoundness of one renders the superstructure unsound also2 and any deductions drawn from unsound principles are comparatively worthless4 ,gunnery1 as a science1 must be in uniformity with truth in all its parts1 or no science exists in its arrangements4 ,this will be best illustrated by dividing the subject into several heads3 #ast1 the explosive power and its velocity2 #bnd1 the retarding agents1 air and friction2 #crd1 the construction of the projectile tubes2 and #dth1 the form of projectile best calculated to attain a perfect result4 #ast4 ,the explosive power4 ,gunpowder has been stated by different authorities to liberate its gases with very different degrees of rapidity4 ,hutton has given to it a much greater rapidity than ,robins has evidently even surmised2 though1 no doubt1 as we have already shown1 high velocity in gunpowder depends on several circumstances--the degree of purification of its ingredients1 their intimate mechanical mixture 7that the elements may exert their affinities with the utmost facility71 and1 lastly1 the degree of granulation observed3 and in addition1 the suitability of the tubes or vessels for carrying on correctly such important experiments4 ,robins and ,hutton unquestionably may be regarded as the ,english1 if not the ,european1 authorities1 and any work on the science of gunnery would be very incomplete without their valuable elucidations4 ,previously to the researches of ,robins1 the theory of atmospheric resistance was but imperfectly surmised1 and when he made his statements of the immense resistance which the fluidity of the air offered to projectiles in a high state of velocity1 they were treated as the idle chimeras of a speculative brain2 and yet he only was enabled to estimate the real effect of the explosive nature and force of gunpowder to a very limited extent3 indeed1 so limited1 that ,hutton1 only twenty years subsequently1 speaking of ,robins' theory1 says1 8,mr4 ,robins and other authors1 it may be said1 have only guessed at1 rather than determined4 ,that ingenious philosopher1 in a simple experiment1 truly showed that1 by the firing of a parcel of gunpowder1 a quantity of elastic air was disengaged2 which1 when confined in the space only occupied by the powder before it was fired1 was found to be nearly #bej times stronger than the weight or elasticity of the common air4 ,he then heated the same parcel of air to the degree of red hot iron1 and found it in that temperature to be about four times as strong as before2 whence he inferred1 that the first strength of the inflamed fluid must be nearly #a1jjj times the pressure of the atmosphere4 ,but this was merely guessing at the degree of heat in the inflamed fluid1 and1 consequently1 of its first strength2 both which in fact are found to be much greater4 ,it is true that this assumed degree of strength accorded pretty well with that author's experiments2 but this seeming agreement1 it might easily be shown1 could only be owing to the inaccuracy of his own further experiments2 and1 in fact1 with far better opportunities than fell to the lot of ,mr4 ,robins1 we have shown that inflamed gunpowder is about double the strength that he has assigned to it1 and that it expands itself with the velocity of about #e1jjj feet per second40 ,on the same subject he further says3--8,on this principle it was that ,mr4 ,robins made all his experiments and performed all his calculations in gunnery4 ,but it is manifest that this method of guessing at the degree of heat of the flame must be very uncertain and unsatisfactory1 being much below the truth2 since all our notions and experience of the heat of inflamed powder convince us that it is higher than that of red hot iron1 and1 indeed1 it has clearly appeared from our experiments1 that its heat is at least double that of red hot iron1 and that it increases the elasticity of the elastic fluid more than eight times40 ,here is evidence1 though not conclusive1 of the immense force of gunpowder1 and also of the progress of knowledge on the subject2 yet it clearly shows the evil of coming to hasty conclusions1 however well supported by apparent facts1 as it has had in this case a tendency to check inquiry and retard the advancement of knowledge4 ,for the extensive experiments of ,hutton were but limited in discovery1 because they were not carried to a sufficient extent1 and thus1 they are quite unsuited to the present day4 ,he was satisfied because he had gone further than any of his predecessors2 and though he established and clearly proved the soundness of his own theory1 yet he could not either view the subject to its utmost bounds1 nor yet go sufficiently far1 but that others1 taking up the question where he left it1 may pursue the subject to a much more remote limit4 ,the subject1 indeed1 was limited to him4 ,he far excelled ,robins1 no doubt1 as he has shown2 but that involves no detraction from the merit due to ,robins for his experiments and discoveries1 no more than any individual proving the subject to be a more extensive one than ,hutton did1 would excel ,hutton2 for the value of improvement is more to be attributed to him who lays the foundation1 than to him who raises the building4 ,so is it in this case2 ,robins laid the foundation for an extensive knowledge of the nature and power of the explosive fluids1 and ,hutton built upon that foundation a certain extent of superstructure1 and there he left it1 without roofing the building3 he considered the question as settled4 ,common consent has1 as yet1 received his conclusion as unshaken and uncontroverted2 and it is not my intention to make the attempt to controvert it1 but merely to show that his deductions fall short of what the principles of gunpowder-making admit--carried out in the more extensive way it has been within the last few years--owing to the limited nature of his experiments4 ,this is rather an extensive position for me to occupy1 or endeavour to hold3 but ,i do not mean the size of the tools of experiment so much as the diversity of them2 for exploding ten thousand tons of powder in the same machine and in the same way1 would but give the same or similar results2 it is the variety and the singularity of experiments that expand and increase the fund of knowledge1 and enable the mind to conceive and comprehend the immensity of the power and velocity of this wonderful combination4 ,we have been principally indebted to the exertions of the chemist for means of purifying and extracting from the ingredients which form this astonishing compound force1 the impurities and foreign substances which exist1 to a certain extent1 in all the three1 and thus tending to form a more perfect combustion by increasing the affinities4 ,hutton shows that gunpowder is but so much condensed air2 for he says 8,we may hence1 also1 deduce the amazing degree of condensation of the elastic air in the nitre and gunpowder1 and the astonishing force experienced by its explosion4 ,it has been found by ,mr4 ,robins1 and other philosophers1 that #c-ajths of the mass of the powder consists of the pure condensed air1 or that the weight of the condensed air is equal to #c-ajths of the whole composition4 ,but the whole composition of the powder consists of eight parts by weight1 of which six parts are nitre1 one part sulphur1 one charcoal2 of which the nitre or #c-dths of the composition furnishes the whole of the condensed air1 while the sulphur and charcoal only give the fire that produces the explosion4 ,but #c-ajths of the whole mass of eight parts is equal to #d-ajths of the six parts of nitre1 that is #d-ajths or #b-eths of the nitre consists of condensed air1 or the weight of the gross matter in the nitre as four to six1 or as two to three2 and these two parts1 it is probable1 are of equal density or specific gravity4 ,yet the specific gravity of nitre is #a1ijj1 that of water being #a1jjj1 and of air #ab1 which is contained in #a1ijj1 as much as #a1ehc times2 that is1 the air in the nitre must be condensed the amazing quantity of #a1ehc times1 if its specific gravity be equal to the compound nitre itself40 ,also1 8,the air is condensed in the nitre about #a1fjj times1 nearly double the density of water1 which may well be considered as probably the greatest degree of compression that air is capable of4 ,hence it may be perceived that a prodigious force must be exerted by nature in generating nitre2 and as this great force actually exists in nature1 it is very probable that the air in the nitre is thus compressed into the most dense state possible1 and in this consists the similitude among the different particles of nitre40 ,this extract from ,hutton enables us to divest the question of any technicalities1 and puts it in so plain a garb that the simplest mind may comprehend it4 ,now1 the great improvement of chemistry has been to extract from the nitre the gross material which is contained in the proportions--#b-eths impurities1 and #b-eths condensed air2 thus1 half the quantity being useless1 the extraction of these alloys gives a greater quantity of condensed gases in the same quantity of matter2 for if we take away #b-eths of the proportions of useless matter1 and supply its place with #b-eths more condensed air1 we thus get #d-eth explosive matter in the same bulk of material1 and thus simply obtain an immense increase of power without an increase in bulk4 ,we have here evidence of the progress that has been made in the science of explosive force4 ,considering the difference between gunpowder in #aghc and gunpowder in #aheh1 ,i cannot say1 with ,hutton1 that the force is doubled now to what it was when he wrote2 but ,i believe that this would not be far from the truth2 for it must be quite clear--if he is correct 7which ,i believe he is7 in saying the force of gunpowder consists in the quantity of explosive matter let loose and expanded by heat--that the greater the quantity of condensed matter we may have in any given weight1 the greater the force1 and the more rapid the explosion3 purified saltpetre thus forming nearly pure gaseous matter2 as the diamond is pure carbon4 ,it seems singular1 and is rather presumptuous to say1 that ,hutton was not much of a chemist2 but had he been more so1 he must have perceived that in the extraction of the foreign matter from the nitre1 existed the means of obtaining an increased quantity of explosive power1 and a proportionate increase of speed or velocity in that explosive material4 ,to ascertain the velocity best suited to all projectiles1 constitutes the germ of the science2 and that we are approaching a new era in even that more intimate portion of the science1 is daily apparent4 ,science shows clearly that if a given force1 a quantity to be correctly ascertained1 can produce a certain result1 the use of more is waste1 and unworthy of the seeker after perfection2 and thus we have to determine upon1 or define1 what is the degree or size of gun for certain effects3 a mere calculation nearly allied to that portion of engineering which would define what power of engine would work a thousand cotton spindles1 or raise a million gallons of water2 and all this will eventually be done4 ,science requires that there should be no excess1 no waste1 no unnecessary recoil1 and all that combined with the utmost range of projectile2 this will have to be defined accurately before we can clearly or truly say we are masters of the science of gunpowder4 ,true it is that the granulation of gunpowder gives a clear road to its attainment2 but it will be a wearisome journey to reach the summit3 yet it must and will be effected1 and the nation that first attempts and carries out the attainment1 will evince a real love for and mastery of science4 ,the following practical experiments illustrate the degree of velocity and the effects of projectiles so clearly1 that they alone will convey some idea of the high velocity of the evolutions of the gases in gunpowder4 ,my experiments are1 like ,robins'1 on a small scale2 nor would ,i1 like ,hutton1 try a brass gun of sixty calibres in length1 carrying a one-pound ball2 for one is strictly more limited than the other1 and thus rendered the results laid down by him imperfect3 for1 as he says1 8,if you fill the tube with powder you get no greater velocity1 as there is not a duration in the confinement to enable the powder to explode40 ,if he had assimilated the grain of his powder to the gun1 he would have obtained a different result2 and a knowledge of this fact1 ,i apprehend1 makes all the difference4 ,the greatest velocity he obtained was with powder #a-a_/b times the weight of the ball in a gun of sixty calibres in length1 and the velocity he then obtained was only #c1aha feet per second4 ,the inferences that probably induced him to recommend others not to endeavour to obtain a greater velocity than #b1jjj feet per second1 were1 like these experiments1 drawn from imperfect data4 ,with a ball of an ounce weight in a barrel of sixty calibres1 and with #c-dths the weight of ball in powder1 or #ab drachms1 a velocity can be given to the ball to equal it in force to #df1hge pounds4 ,the velocity of this ball ,i leave to the calculations of the mathematical world4 ,but1 however1 ,i will give the results of a round of experiments tried to ascertain this2 and if the data laid down be correct1 that the velocity of a ball must be multiplied by its weight to find the force1 the result will be the establishment of a system of velocity never yet dreamt of4 ,i cannot but imagine that there exists some error2 though where it is ,i know not3 every deduction ,i have drawn is consequent upon the results hereafter described4 8,the power required to force a punch #jej inch diameter through an iron plate #jjh inch thick is #f1jbe pounds1 through copper #c1ich pounds4 ,a simple rule for determining the force required for punching may thus be deduced3-- 8,taking one inch diameter and one inch in thickness as the units of calculation it is shown that #aej1jjj is the constant number for wrought-iron plates1 and #if1jjj for copper plates4 8,multiply the constant number by the given diameter in inches1 the product is the pressure in pounds which will be required to punch a hole of a given diameter through a plate of a given thickness40 ,now an idea struck me1 that this would form a very good test of the comparative force of gunpowder1 and ,i consequently commenced an extensive round of experiments4 ,in the first attempt ,i found the results to vary with the weight of the pendulum of iron plate1 and that it was necessary to obtain uniformity of size and surface2 as it must be comprehended that the only resisting medium to the pendulous plate was atmospheric resistance1 and a dissimilarity of size of surface would invariably give different results4 ,having a number of plates of the different thicknesses hereafter described1 ,i continued increasing the charge from a definite quantity1 until the projectile was driven with sufficient velocity to perforate the plate suspended4 ,the gun selected for this purpose was of heavy material1 weighing nearly seventeen pounds1 it was three feet long1 the metal of the barrel as thick at the muzzle as at the breech1 and carried a spherical ball of sixteen to the pound1 or one ounce1 and which fitted tight with the thinnest patch procurable4 ,the bore was perfectly cylindrical1 and plain inside1 being polished longitudinally to a high state of fineness4 ,with a charge of twelve drachms of ,curtis and ,harvey's diamond grain powder1 the ball went through the half-inch plate1 but went only a few yards further2 denoting that the effort necessary had nearly exhausted its velocity and momentum4 ,the recoil of the gun was of the most severe description1 and the shoulder had to be protected for many explosions previous to this high charge4 ,the larger sized grain was insufficient1 ten drachms effecting the greatest extent of power it seemed capable of1 and it became quite apparent that the tube would not explode more powder1 as indications convinced me3 when any more was added1 a portion came out unburnt4 ,the force necessary to effect this1 by the above calculation1 is #df1gie pounds4 ,the next plate was #g-afths thick1 and a charge of ten drachms punched the piece out clean2 nine and a half drachms were equal to it1 when the centre of the pendulum could be hit fairly1 because there was then an equal resistance from the atmosphere1 which cannot exist in cases where the edge of the disc receives the blow4 ,i got with ease a perforation in a #f-afths plate1 with a charge of either fine or coarse powder1 not exceeding eight drachms2 a charge of seven drachms of fine grain was unequal to the task2 but seven drachms of the coarse showed evidently greater effects produced1 though the perforation was not perfect4 ,six and a half drachms of ,no4 #b grain penetrated a plate of #e-afths thick easily1 while it took full six and three-quarters drachms of fine grain2 five drachms of the larger perforated a quarter-inch plate1 but it took full five and a half drachms of fine grain to effect the same2 while a #c-afths plate took three and three-quarters drachms of fine1 or three and a quarter of ,no4 #b grain2 and #a-hth plate was easily punched by a charge of two and a half drachms coarse or three drachms fine4 ,i will place the relative results in a table1 with the force effected by each3-- ,oz4 ,drachms4 ,punched a boiler plate ,equal in force to #a ball #ab of powder ,half-inch thick #df1hge lbs4 #a #aj #g-afths #da1jae #a #h #f-afths #ce1aee #a #f-a_/b #e-afths #bi1bie #a #e #d-afths #bc1dcg #a #c-a_/d #c-afths #ag1egh #a #b #b-afths #aa1gah ,were ,i to adopt the established method of calculation1 multiplying the weight of ball by the velocity1 ,i should get an answer that would point to the utter impossibility of any such velocity being possible4 ,and yet the result is1 according to the rule of figures1 correct2 but in truth there are exceptions to many rules1 for they are only correct when applied to known products4 ,that the velocity of these balls was much1 very much1 greater than #g1jjj feet per second of time1 there cannot be any doubt2 it was nearly three times that4 ,yet ,i must not conceal the fact1 that this punching is the more perfect1 the higher the velocity2 and it shows how the fibres of iron are separated from a want of vibration to equilibrise the cohesion4 ,mr4 ,colthurst found that duration of pressure lessened the ultimate force necessary to punch through metal1 and thus it may be that extremely quick pressure may produce the same4 ,therefore ,i suspect it is not the most correct theory that calculates force to be accomplished at all times by extreme velocity2 there will be found discrepancies in the rule1 and one of them arises from no calculation ever having been made with extreme velocities3 medium velocities may generally give such conclusions1 but the very extreme in this case can never have been taken into consideration at all2 as ,i have very little doubt--in fact1 ,i am certain--that no person ever obtained such high velocity before4 ,it must1 and is a vast deal greater1 incomprehensibly greater1 than any velocity obtained by ,hutton2 and much more extensive than ever could be obtained1 or1 in fact1 ever will1 by any ordnance whatever4 ,i wish much ,i could have experimented with a gun of greater length and bore1 for with one in every way fitted for the purpose1 ,i have no doubt of being able to perforate an inch thickness of plate4 ,should any person possessing the opportunity and means1 wish to try the experiment1 ,i would advise them to get a barrel of #d-a_/b feet long1 #h bore1 to carry a #b oz4 ball1 and of a weight to allow of extending the explosion up to #cj drs4 of powder2 they would then obtain the extent of force ,i have suggested4 ,there is a certain point to be strictly observed3 see that the plate you use is perfectly sound2 for if laminated1 or composed of various plates not firmly welded and attached1 the experiment would be imperfect1 as there would be an uneven vibration created1 and acting as the hammer does when held against the point of the nail while driving it in1 clinches the point1 so does the substance in the portions of plate prevent a perforation4 ,an ounce ball1 suspended against the back of the pendulum1 by the jar or blow it receives and communicates1 completely prevents the effect1 and the ball is flattened1 instead of perforating the object struck3 so is it if you place a #a_/d-;inch plate against any support2 it thus has the power of perfectly resisting the force of the ball1 though fired with considerably more power than is requisite under other circumstances4 ,the effect appears to be chiefly mechanical2 the outer fibres are driven in upon those behind them with such quickness that they lose cohesion1 or are condensed quicker than the waves of vibration travel1 thus giving them no means of communicating the vibration4 ,but when punched1 the rapidity of their motion produces in the metal a sound of the most intense vivacity1 which plays upon the ear for a considerable period1 with rather a pleasant effect4 ,lead alone is capable of being used in this experiment2 except1 of course1 the precious metals1 which it would not be convenient to use4 ,even an adulteration of the slightest quantity of solder is sufficient to prevent the result which lead1 pure1 will invariably give4 ,lead projected against lead1 if sufficiently thick1 cannot perforate1 but the lesser portion becomes flattened2 a cast-iron ball fired against lead1 with a certain velocity1 is broken into pieces1 affecting the lead comparatively little3 showing beautifully the peculiarity of dense incompressible bodies to resist most effectually the greater the velocity with which they are struck4 ,water will1 if struck very sharply with the flat of a sword1 act against the blow in a way to splinter the blade into pieces4 ,the greater the velocity with which a ball is fired into water1 the less the depth of penetration2 thus showing clearly the many excellent properties of dense incompressible bodies as projectiles1 and proving the objection that lead is too soft for artillery to be without a foundation1 and only entertained from a want of knowledge of its nature4 ,a point of great importance was exemplified during these experiments2 and as the question has lately given rise to considerable discussion1 it will be well that the facts should be stated4 ,at very short distances from the muzzle of the gun the penetration was found to be less than at distances more extended4 ,at five yards the iron plate could not be perforated2 at ten yards the effect was much greater1 but fifteen yards was the least distance at which it could be said to be effectually perforated2 at twenty yards the result was still more satisfactory1 clearly demonstrating that bullets gain both in velocity and penetration for a considerable distance after leaving the muzzle of the gun4 ,the following experiments verify this remark3-- ,in the report of the experiments which were carried on at ,cork in #aheb1 it is stated that the power of penetration of an elongated rifle bullet gradually increases as the range is increased1 up to #aij yards4 ,in order to prove this1 experiments were carried on at ,enfield for three days with a variety of fire-arms1 and different sorts of projectiles4 ,on the fourth day the experiments were repeated with the common musket and ,wilkinson's rifle4 ,the former1 at forty yards1 gave a penetration of #bbe inches2 and the latter averaged #bge1 in a target of green elm4 ,again3 at ninety yards1 the musket penetrated #bbe inches1 and the rifle #ce inches4 ,at #abj yards1 the musket gave #be inches1 and the rifle #cbe4 ,both being subsequently fired at every successive ten yards up to #bbj1 the result was that the penetration of the musket ball gradually decreased in power as the distance increased1 while the elongated bullet gained power of penetration up to #aij yards2 after which it slightly decreased4 #bnd4 ,consequent on the velocity of the explosive fluids is the resistance of that ariform fluid filling all space4 ,it has been calculated that in a vacuum1 matter in motion would be a long time in coming to rest2 and very providentially it is that nature in her grand arrangements has made one element to control another4 ,in no other portion of nature's work has anything more wonderful than atmospheric air been produced2 its action on the velocity of projectiles is of so extensive a nature1 that without clearly understanding that action1 the science of gunnery never can be thoroughly acquired4 ,the resistance of the atmosphere is in proportion to the velocity of the attempt to displace it2 the higher that velocity becomes1 the greater is the resistance4 ,this is shown by the actions of all the fulminates4 ,a quantity of the fulminate of silver exploded on a copper plate will perforate that plate1 or1 if fired upon a piece of wood1 will bury itself in that substance1 splintering it in proportion to the quantity4 ,now1 ordinary gunpowder has no such effect as this1 because1 though it may produce the same amount of expansive gas1 it produces it at one-fourth the velocity of the fulminates3 the air is driven back upon itself so gradually as to offer no very important resistance2 but the action of the fulminates is so rapid and so violent that the high elasticity of the air has not time to yield1 and the force is driven into the apparently more solid material1 the copper or the wood4 ,the mode in which atmospheric resistance mostly interferes with projectile force is owing to the columnar form it assumes in the tubes of all descriptions of gunnery4 ,if the velocity of gunpowder be as great as we suppose it to be1 the displacement of a column of air must be effected by driving the whole column in a gun-barrel of many inches1 into a column probably less than half an inch in height2 or1 if the length of the tube from the starting of the charge to the muzzle be #ch inches1 then will the displacement require a force capable of condensing thirty-eight atmospheres into one1 or something like #egj lbs42 without estimating the lateral pressure of that column on the sides of the gun-barrel1 which may be safely estimated at one-half more4 ,it may be supposed that the column would be partially in motion for a greater distance than half an inch in front of the projectile2 but this is disproved by the fact that time is essential to put ariform matter in motion1 and naturally it never does so at a greater velocity than it is familiarly known to do in the shape of winds3 but the fact is better illustrated by the frequent bursting of barrels near the muzzle1 caused by a piece of snow or clay1 a piece of paper or wadding4 ,were a current established around this projection it would pass on1 but the air strikes these light obstructions when in a high state of condensation1 amounting to many atmospheres in one3 so many as to be nearly equal to a solid which is more powerful than the barrel2 the latter therefore succumbs to it4 ,the resistance of the air is so highly philosophical a question1 that ,i merely touch on its actual bearings on the passage of projectiles to show how the quantity of force is absorbed or expended in relation to the quantity of the gunpowder employed2 which1 it may be assumed1 is a proportion of nearly one-third of the whole1 or a quantity independent of that necessary to give velocity to the leaden projectile1 to enable it to overcome the still and uniform impeding agent up to the end of its flight4 ,the rapid exit of the bullet from the barrel1 with a resisting influence of this weight into the comparatively insignificant one of #ae lbs4 to the square inch1 will fully explain how it is that a bullet increases in velocity even up to a considerable distance after leaving the muzzle of the gun2 and further showing that in all arrangements of truly scientific gunnery1 the increasing resistance must be met by a fresh production of explosive fluid over every atom of space in that tube1 where it is demonstrable that the resistance is increasing in a geometrical progression as the point of exit is becoming nearer2 so that gunnery1 unless all the contingencies are provided for1 must necessarily remain an imperfect science4 ,intimately allied to the displacement of the atmosphere is the amount of friction4 ,gunnery is now rid of the anomaly of being assisted by friction3 the detention of the projectile in the tube by artificial friction1 to enable more force to be generated1 is one of those absurdities pardonable only in bygone days4 ,science is best consulted by lessening friction2 guns of steel1 with interiors as fine as the polish in a mirror1 are found to shoot best3 a rough road is but so much force uselessly absorbed2 the experience of the last few years having proved that a range of #a1hjj yards cannot be accomplished except with barrels having surfaces as smooth as possible4 ,rifles1 no doubt1 are now in use in which1 by increasing the degree of spiral1 friction is more than doubled1 perhaps trebled2 but such unscientific constructions are but as one error to counteract another4 ,unscientifically formed projectiles not having in themselves the principles necessary for true flight1 have to receive a counteracting agency in the shape of additional spinning1 on an axis coincident to the line of flight1 to enable them to range a given distance1 with1 as it will be perceived1 an additional amount of expellant agency2 but these cannot be included in the category of scientific gunnery4 #crd4 ,next to absence of friction is the construction of the gun barrel4 ,already have we shown that the inner surface of a gun barrel requires to be like glass2 next to this it is necessary that the metal should be composed of the most unyielding structure4 ,metals absorb force in proportion to their softness3 a barrel constructed of lead gives the worst result of any metal2 in truth1 as is the increase of tenacity and density in the tube1 so is the increase of range in projectiles4 ,the wonderful results displayed by the use of steel guns of all descriptions bear out this assertion to the fullest extent4 ,a yielding gun barrel may be compared to the dragging of a heavily loaded waggon over boggy ground1 which rises in a wave before the wheels during its progress4 #dth4 ,next in importance to the inflexibility of the gun barrel is the form of projectile best calculated to displace the atmosphere during its extended flight4 ,under the head of ,rifles this subject will be more fully discussed2 but1 as thousands of years have stamped the arrow as being in accordance with nature's laws1 it should no doubt be the object of science to approximate the leaden projectile to that form as much as possible1 and hence the cylindro-conoidal may be assumed to be the best form of projectile4 ,that both ,jacob's and ,whitworth's bullets partake of a certain amount of 8wabbling0 motion after leading the muzzle of the gun is certain1 from their length1 as well as from the fact that in both the centre of gravity is in the hinder part of the bullet2 thus they are both in reality bad in a scientific point of view4 ,if any merit can be claimed for either1 it is on account of the mechanical ingenuity displayed in neutralizing the effects of want of scientific principle4 ,the want of principle1 however1 is not the only evil1 were such guns to come into general use2 their manufacture1 in the hands of that portion of the gun trade which never estimates consequences1 and never studies the theory of the science at all1 but manufactures all fire-arms by 8rule of thumb10 would prove dangerous in the extreme4 ,the bursting of barrels in any attempt to project lengthened projectiles is of a very different description to that which ordinarily occurs1 on account of the different direction in which the force is applied4 ,in consequence of their greater length1 and their increased friction against the sides of the barrel1 they are more reluctantly set in motion--i4 e41 their inertia is with greater difficulty overcome4 ,the result of this is1 that in overcoming their inertia the greatest strain is exerted backward1 on the breech of the gun2 which1 if not more firm than usual1 is blown out1 entering the forehead of the shooter3 an accident which would prove fatal not only to the gun1 but to the person who used it4 ,this accident may no doubt be effectually guarded against by strengthening the breech end of the gun as well as the breech itself2 but without that precaution it is to be feared that such accidents would be of frequent occurrence4 ,a considerable error may easily be promulgated1 as to the heat necessary to be applied ere gunpowder will explode4 ,a late writer says1 it is necessary to raise it to #fjj degrees before it is explosive4 ,this is a splitting of hairs1 and such a palpable mystification1 that it is scarcely worth noticing4 ,but ,i will explain3 if you place upon a plate a few grains of powder1 by heating the plate underneath 7for instance1 on a smith's fire17 you will see the sulphur giving out a blue flame1 it being easily fused4 ,as the plate becomes heated to nearly a red heat1 the whole explodes1 in consequence of the charcoal and nitre not being hot enough to allow the gases generating the heat to be liberated2 but as soon as this does take place the explosion ensues4 ,now1 it is a well known fact1 that the smallest particle of matter possessing above #fjj of heat1 will ignite any quantity of powder it comes in immediate contact with2 we will suppose with one portion of charcoal1 one of sulphur1 and one of nitre 7it matters not how small they are3 a ten hundredth part of the substance of one of the smallest grains of powder would suffice71 and if it has the means of communicating to these small portions #fjj1 this is sufficient1 as their explosion induces also that of the very largest quantity3 for it ought to be perfectly understood1 that a great explosion is but so many millions of small ones combined1 and by their united force effecting the great results we see4 ,the ingredients of powder are ground and intimately mixed together on the bed of the mill to the great extent they are1 to the end that1 if possible1 there shall not be in the composition two grains or portions of one ingredient in immediate contact with each other2 but that1 when the ignition does take place1 each may be present to add its peculiar gas1 in order that each affinity may be supplied4 ,thus becomes evident the necessity of a most extensive incorporation1 a blending and equal division of mixture throughout the whole material4 ,the advantage of unglazed gunpowder is here fully shown2 for it presents an inequality1 a roughness of surface1 over which the flame from the percussion mixture cannot travel without igniting some of the prominent parts1 and thus the whole4 ,you may glaze powder and make it so smooth that it would be very difficult indeed to ignite2 but except that it enables the powder to resist moisture better1 it is otherwise very detrimental1 as tending both to prevent ignition and lengthening the period of effecting it4 ,the flame from the percussion powder is of that intense and vivid description1 that if a charge of powder in the breech of a gun is loose1 the flame will form a mass of condensed air round itself1 and driving the grains of powder before it1 prevent the immediate contact of the heat and the particles of powder1 until the heat is expended2 and thus arises a 8miss fire40 ,if the powder is up only to the nipple1 there being a quantity of air in the tube of that nipple1 the explosion of the fluid will drive down this air1 and condense it between the powder and top of the nipple to such an extent as to cause a certain 8miss fire40 ,it becomes requisite to find a remedy for this1 and it can only be done by bringing the powder into the very vicinity of the explosion on the nipple4 ,this can be effected in several ways1 but the most perfect is to obtain as direct a communication as possible2 a widening of the perforations of the breech1 and space to allow the powder free access up the nipple4 ,for this purpose we propose an improved form of nipple4 ,the centre one of the three 7here shown in section7 is considerably broader and shorter than the others4 ,a cap made broader and not so deep would be an improvement1 as bringing the point of ignition nearer the charge1 and thus effecting a saving of time2 for great and wonderfully quick as is the explosion1 it is clear to the senses that it may be quickened4 ,we are not finding fault with the 8lightning being too slow10 as ,colonel ,hawker says2 but science means perfection1 and the nearer we can come to it the better4 ,illustration3 ,,old ,,plan ,,of ,,nipple4 ,,newest ,,plan ,,of ,,nipple4 ,,improved ,,nipple ,,of #ahce4 ,the nipples now in general use have the smaller orifice at the bottom1 and1 being lined with platina1 never foul4 ,experience has shown that admitting the gunpowder into the nipple 8is not advantageous10 especially with large grained powder2 by constructing the nipple with the small orifice at the bottom1 the largest grain can be used beneficially4 ,as the velocity of the fulminating gas is much greater than 8a train0 of gunpowder ever can be1 quickness is also gained by their adoption4 ,i have used them for many years with great success2 nothing but cost deters their general adoption4 ,the passing of the flame through the very small opening in the platina1 by this very high impingement1 increases its heat to a great extent1 ensuring explosion4 ,the true science of gunnery consists in knowing that a certain force is requisite to effect a certain purpose1 or1 in other words1 to kill at a certain distance2 and also how to arrange that force so as to effect the purpose without having any extra force1 or any waste of powder1 nor yet too little1 but with a corresponding result3 a sufficiency2 neither more nor less4 ,this we have shown is attainable by the mechanical arrangement of granulation2 for it is useless to use less1 or to use an iota more of fine grain powder1 if the size larger will effect the purpose without that iota4 ,propellant velocity is the grand desideratum in all gunnery2 the obtainment of this1 to the greatest extent1 is the power of killing at the greatest distance3 all ranges are dependent on velocity2 no extreme range can be obtained without a corresponding speed4 ,the very finest powder1 it will be perceived1 is fitted--perfectly fitted1 preferable1 indeed--to coarser grain for guns of a short length of tube1 where a perfect combustion of the whole charge can be obtained without any waste or want2 but as such is quite unsuited for longer barrels3 ,i cannot too often repeat it4 ,the column of air is the ruling power4 ,look what its effects are by ,hutton's calculations1 with the very low velocities he obtained6 ,so great as to bring all projectiles he used to a medium velocity1 before they were projected beyond a certain distance4 ,then what must its resistance be where the velocities are trebled8 ,i say trebled1 for my powder and the percussion combined have more than trebled the velocities4 ,you must then clearly have a powder of such grain as suits the capacity of your gun4 ,all barrels have a size of grain that will suit them best1 and manufacturers of gunpowder will consult their own profit and the convenience of sportsmen1 if they assimilate the grain of powder to various sizes2 as in shot1 to ,no4 #a1 ,no4 #b1 #c1 #d1 #e1 and so on3 eventually this system must be adopted4 ,this will explain quite clearly how the fact 7singular to many7 occurs1 of short guns excelling their longer competitors1 and how frequently a particular maker obtains an immensity of credit for an excellent gun only twenty-two inches3 8,beat my ,lord ,so-and-so's of thirty inches60 and how1 8,when ,i cut four inches off my double1 she shot better than ever she did40 ,all these occurrences are perfectly dependent on a knowledge of the generating of the explosive force1 and may be reversed at any time by a person possessed of sufficient knowledge of these facts3 put in coarse grain into the short gun1 and fine into the long1 and the facts will be changed considerably1 as will be easily seen4 ,a degree of mystery has hitherto existed as to the cause of this discrepancy2 but ,i trust this explanation will clear it up4 ,experiment has shown the error of stating that only a certain quantity of powder could be consumed3 the proportion stated was considerably below the actual quantity1 as the experiments of punching the plates show2 for since twelve drachms can be burnt in a three-feet barrel1 therefore ten drachms may be consumed in one two feet eight inches1 with a given weight to lift4 ,in addition to this1 must be placed the fact of improvement1 both in the composition and granulation of the powder2 which we have no hesitation in stating has been considerable1 within only a very few years1 all tending to the quickness of generating force4 ,the granulatory system1 if acted upon1 will give the sportsman or soldier a completely new power in gunnery2 for it must be evident1 if we have the means of projecting certain bodies with an extreme velocity1 say #e1jjj feet per second1 it becomes a simple calculation to ascertain the quantity of force and length of tube to give to a certain weight4 ,take1 for instance1 an ounce ball in a barrel two feet six inches long4 ,extremely fine grain powder1 from its rapidity of expansion1 gives to the ball this velocity at fifteen inches from the breech2 the remaining fifteen inches contain a column of air highly condensed1 which will inevitably reduce this velocity back nearly fifty per cent41 or #b1ejj1 and with that velocity the ball leaves the muzzle4 ,therefore1 as we have already said1 it must be evident you have here generated a high speed to be as quickly reduced2 and it shows clearly that if a different grain of powder would expand from breech to muzzle1 increasing the velocity on a granulated scale until it obtained the highest1 or #e1jjj feet per second1 as the ball left the muzzle1 you would save here clear #ej per cent4 in force1 with less recoil1 less internal strain on the barrel1 and with exactly the same weight of powder2 thus showing that you have just a definite quantity of force in a definite quantity of powder4 ,the true science of gunnery is the knowledge how to best arrange the collateral parts1 so that you may obtain the greatest result with the least means4 ,i have also clearly shown that the resistance of the atmosphere is one1 and the principal obstruction in the attainment of high velocities2 its resistance being regulated entirely by the degree of speed with which it is wanted to be displaced4 ,thus it is true1 as both ,robins and ,hutton have shown1 that only a certain velocity can be obtained beneficially2 though the degree is considerably greater then either conceived1 as far greater impetus has been obtained1 and projected bodies have ranged much beyond their calculations1 and that beneficially too4 ,one drawback on the theory of these gentlemen is their calculating the velocities with iron projectiles2 for the heavier the material the more powerful the momentum1 and consequently the longer retention of their velocity1 from not presenting the same space to the resisting medium1 the air4 ,the development of the system of granulation must and does exercise considerable control over the shooting of barrels of every description4 ,i have already explained what has been hitherto considered the curious phenomena of short and long barrels shooting so dissimilarly1 and this illustration completely establishes the fact of the expulsive and repulsive forces being controlled by each other3 as either preponderates1 so is the result4 ,the open-ended barrel projecting balls1 and eventually bursting1 is a beautiful and interesting elucidation1 both of the force of gunpowder and the stubborn nature of the atmospheric fluid4 ,all these facts are valuable1 inasmuch as they lay bare circumstances which have never been satisfactorily accounted for1 and enable the mind of lowest capacity to understand the cause and effect4 ,the superiority of one barrel in throwing shot stronger and more evenly distributed1 arises1 it will be easily seen1 from the absence1 or existence of1 internal friction1 when contrasted with the different degrees of expelling force1 and the degree of resistance from the atmosphere2 it also accounts clearly for the fact of guns shooting stronger on one day than on another1 in fine and in rough weather3 the weight1 the resistance of the air1 is the only cause of the variation2 for gunpowder cannot drive back a dense atmosphere as quickly as a lighter one4 ,the cause of guns bursting is to be placed to the account of both air and the generation of the explosive fluid so instantaneously2 the solid front which air offers to quick compression1 throws the force on the barrel1 and the sides of the tube give way because they are weaker3 this cannot occur so easily with powder of a more gradually expansive force1 therefore safety is consulted in its use1 in addition to the numerous advantages it otherwise possesses4 ,mr4 ,blaine1 in his ,encyclopdia of ,rural ,sports1 has the following3 8,the increase of metal in the detonator1 we think1 with ,colonel ,hawker1 to be an essential requisite1 first1 to resist the quicker1 and1 consequently1 more forcible1 expansive force applied by the ignition of the powder through the agency of detonation1 and tend to lessen the recoil so much more forcibly felt in most detonators4 ,this increased weight of percussion ,mr4 ,greener1 however1 objects to1 and inquires1 #8,whether some of the best flint guns met with1 have not been very light8' ,to this we answer1 that it was the principle on which the explosion of the flint gun was effected that enabled it to be made lighter1 and yet to remain equally safe in using2 but we also know1 that where it was required to add to the rapidity and force of the ignition1 it then became necessary to increase the substance of the barrel40 ,experience teaches the writer1 and ,i dare say it would ,mr4 ,blaine1 if he were to experiment to the extent ,i have done1 that there is no rapidity in the ignition further than the closing of that point of ignition by the cock1 and no 8force0 beyond what the comparative instantaneous ignition of the gunpowder in the nipple creates4 ,this is quite sufficient to prevent the further penetration of the percussion flame2 and the only increase1 to quote his own words1 8to resist the quicker1 and1 consequently1 more expansive1 force applied by the ignition of the powder through the agency of detonation10 arises from an improvement 7as it is termed7 in the granulation of the powder1 which alone creates the increased expansive force4 ,this will be clearly understood by any one reading this work from the beginning2 the only difference between the flint and percussion systems is the stopping of the orifice of ignition in one1 and allowing it to escape in the other2 for the flame has to travel to windward 7to use a nautical expression7 in the flint2 the other has its own accumulating power to force ignition through the body of the powder4 ,this alone constitutes the difference4 ,the necessity for an increase of metal at the breech of a barrel does not arise from any peculiarity in the mode of communicating the fire1 but in the increased inflammability of the powder alone4 ,the extreme smallness of grain has effected this more than the use of fulminating flame2 and the continuous cry for fine powder1 to get better up the nipples1 has produced an alteration which is placed wrongfully to the credit of the percussion4 ,again1 he says1 8,mr4 ,greener1 however1 would have us acquire this increase of power of resistance1 not by quantity of material1 but by increased tenacity and elasticity in the metal the gun is formed of1 and we agree that it would be a great improvement if it could be brought about4 ,but what is our prospect of it8 ,is it not the general complaint that gun metal is not by any means what it was8 ,we have shown that it is not2 and1 therefore1 we do not think1 as ,mr4 ,greener asserts1 that any recommendation of increased weight of metal to the percussion barrel beyond that of the flint gun 8is founded on ignorance20 but1 on the contrary1 that the very reason ,mr4 ,greener gives to prove it1 is that which we think affords evidence of its perfect rationality1 the explosive force created40 ,the answer given above applies to this also3 save on the score of lessening recoil1 superior quality is preferable1 to quantity4 ,the shooting powers of gun barrels are dependent on two circumstances--goodness of metal1 and a proper shape of exterior3 it cannot be too often repeated1 that a gun barrel is a spring1 to all intents and purposes2 if you add metal1 you add stubbornness1 and destroy that expansibility1 without the existence of which the barrel is1 comparatively speaking1 useless4 ,heavy1 ponderous barrels do not propel a charge of shot with either that smartness or degree of closeness that a barrel more scientifically constructed does2 you have less recoil certainly1 but the addition of half an inch of more metal behind the butt of the breech would do this more effectually1 and save you carrying an additional weight4 ,the gradual ignition of powder obviates the necessity of a great thickness of metal in the sides of the barrels2 but if it is determined to persevere in the use of peculiarly fine grained powder1 you would certainly be justified1 nay1 required1 to have more and better metal than at present1 for the electrical nature of the explosion will throw upon the tube that force which would be more judiciously employed in giving impetus to the charge of projectiles4 ,i have found that expansion will increase the shooting powers of a barrel2 but then it must not be the expansion of an unelastic piece of metal1 but of metal whose elasticity rebounds with a force equal to that with which it expands2 for whatever else you may obtain by creating friction1 by boring the breech end of the barrel wider you obtain a greater expansion1 as it no doubt has that tendency4 ,we find it an invariable fact1 that when barrels are very heavy1 compared with their size of bore 7if a cylinder71 they shoot weak4 ,also1 when barrels are made of irons of different temperatures1 where one is placed to prevent the expansion or springing nature of the other1 they are never found to shoot well4 ,as a proof of this fact1 let any one take the best barrel he ever shot with1 and encase it with lead very tight2 fire it at a dozen sheets of paper1 and see if the effect be equal to what it was when the barrel was unencumbered4 ,on the contrary1 it will be found to have shot very weak1 though close4 ,let him then examine the lead2 and1 if any moderate substance1 he will find that the explosion has enlarged it considerably4 ,this experiment ,i have tried repeatedly1 and can vouch for its truth4 ,the proof of barrels is another fact corroborating the truth of our assertion4 ,what else can occasion the bulging1 but the expansion8 ,where the barrels are possessed of soft and hard portions 7which is the result of different tempers of different metals71 one expands further than the other1 and then1 of course1 the soft part receives no assistance from the hard1 and it does not return to its original state4 ,put on a barrel1 from the breech end to the muzzle1 a number of rings of lead2 be sure you have them tight1 and not further apart than three or four inches2 fire that barrel with a usual charge1 and if it be a correct taper for shooting1 it will have expanded the whole of the rings an equal distance4 ,from the observations already made1 the reader will perceive that the shooting of all barrels depends on a certain degree of friction4 ,the degree of friction necessary1 varies according to the nature and substance of the metal4 ,those metals that require least shoot best4 ,the object of the friction is to create a greater force1 by detaining the charge longer in the barrel4 ,if1 then1 there should not be an extra quantity of powder to consume1 the friction would be a decided evil4 ,this may be understood by rifle practice1 in which we find that a short barrel of eighteen inches1 with a certain charge1 will throw a ball as straight1 and quite as strong1 or stronger1 than a barrel of three feet1 loaded with a similar charge4 ,i account for this fact thus3 the barrel of eighteen inches will burn all the powder put into it2 the long one can do no more4 ,as soon as the ball has left the short barrel1 it meets with no impediment but the air4 ,by the time the ball in the longer one has travelled eighteen inches the powder is all consumed2 the volume of air in the remaining eighteen inches acts as a destroyer of the force given to it1 and it naturally drops its ball short of the other4 ,increase the charge of powder to as much as the long one can burn1 and then it will throw its shot to nearly twice the distance of the other4 ,an addition of powder beyond the quantity the barrel can consume is disadvantageous2 the reverse will be found equally so4 ,thus it is with fowling-pieces4 ,the quantity of powder that a gun would burn in the shape of a cylinder1 would be too little1 when1 by altering that shape1 you increase the friction4 ,the quantity must1 therefore1 be increased1 or this friction will diminish the force of the shot4 ,it is on this that the mistaken supposition is founded1 that short barrels will shoot as far as long ones4 ,it is true that with a small charge1 or very fine powder1 the short barrel will kill at the distance of thirty yards1 as well as the long one2 but put in the long one as much powder as it can consume1 then try the two at twice the distance1 and you will find out the mistake under which you have been labouring4 ,it is on the nature of the metal that the goodness of the shooting principally depends4 ,that barrel which is possessed of the greatest degree of elasticity and tenacity1 will throw its shot strongest and closest with the least artificial friction4 ,it is on the knowledge of the qualities and temperatures of the various irons1 and on practice in the art of shooting1 that a man's ability in making guns shoot with precision must rest4 ,all plans are merely methods by which an unscientific maker has most frequently succeeded4 ,it would be no difficult task to produce a hundred barrels which will shoot nearly alike2 yet every barrel shall be different in its bore4 ,the length of friction depends entirely on the length of the barrel4 ,long barrels require more than short1 though the latter require it in a greater degree4 ,a mode of creating friction1 much practised by those who are ignorant of the true method1 is to bore the barrels as rough and as full of rings as possible4 ,these rings are often taken for flaws2 though that may be ascertained by noticing whether or not they have the same inclination as the twist1 and whether or not they are at the jointing of a spiral4 ,if they be not1 the chance is that the barrel is ring-bored1 as it is termed4 ,this roughness1 however1 answers the same as friction by relief2 but barrels thus roughened are very liable to lead1 and become foul4 ,while the well-bored barrel will fire forty shots as well as twenty1 these cannot be fired more than twenty times with safety and effect4 ,each of the barrels in the table below1 if #c-afths thick at the breech1 is equal to the pressure stated4 ,the resistance of a charge of shot of one ounce we find to be more than before stated2 and the additional increase of explosive force obtained at the moment of ignition1 requires the amount to be much greater in computation1 therefore1 we may safely take a pressure of #a1gjj pounds to the inch of tube4 ,the reader will perceive1 on reference to the following table1 that with the tube filled with powder for an inch in length1 which is a small charge1 the explosive force will be equal to #dj1jjj pounds1 or nearly #a1gjj pounds to the inch4 ,pressure of ,surplus charge4 strength4 ,laminated and other steel barrels lbs4 lbs4 lbs4 are equal to a pressure of #f1jbb #a1gjj #d1cbi ,wire twist #e1jai-a_/b #a1gjj #c1cai-a_/b ,new stub twist mixture #e1eee #a1gjj #c1hee ,old stub twist #d1hah #a1gjj #c1aah ,charcoal iron #d1ebf #a1gjj #b1hbf ,threepenny skelp iron #c1hda #a1gjj #b1ada ,damascus iron #c1bib #a1gjj #a1eib ,fancy twisted steel #c1acd #a1gjj #a1dcd ,twopenny skelp iron #b1hdj #a1gjj #a1adj ,if the charge he increased to one ounce and a half1 the length it occupies1 and the lateral pressure by the jamming1 will create an additional pressure in proportion1 or near #b1eej pounds1 as under3-- ,pressure of ,surplus #a-a_/b oz4 shot4 strength4 ,laminated and other steel barrels lbs4 lbs4 lbs4 are equal to a pressure of #f1jbb #b1eej #c1dgb ,wire twist barrel #e1jai-a_/b #b1eej #b1dfi-a_/b ,new stub twist mixture #e1eee #b1eej #c1jje ,old stub twist #d1hah #b1eej #b1bfh ,charcoal iron #d1ebf #b1eej #a1igf ,threepenny skelp iron #c1hda #b1eej #a1bia ,damascus iron #c1bib #b1eej #gdb ,fancy twisted steel #c1acd #b1eej #ehd ,twopenny skelp iron #b1hdj #b1eej #bij ,a charge of shot two ounces weight will be greater in pressure than barrels of these dimensions are equal to restrain1 and1 consequently1 no barrels should be charged to this extent at any time2 but inferior barrels1 as a matter of certainty1 are sure to give way if so loaded4 ,pressure of ,surplus4 #b oz4 shot4 lbs4 lbs4 lbs4 ,laminated barrels1 c4 #f1jbb #c1djj #b1fbb ,wire twist barrels #e1jbi-a_/b #c1djj #a1fai-a_/b ,new stub twist mixture #e1eee #c1djj #b1aee ,old stub twist #d1hah #c1djj #a1dah ,charcoal iron #d1ebf #c1djj #a1abf ,threepenny skelp iron #c1hda #c1djj #dda ,damascus iron #c1bib #c1djj ,fancy steel barrels #c1acd #c1djj ,twopenny skelp iron #b1hdj #c1djj ,the foregoing tables show clearly the danger of persevering in using heavy charges of shot2 for it must be borne in mind that accidental circumstances will increase this pressure1 and never can act so as to lessen it3 a foul gun1 or a variety of other circumstances1 being sure to increase the danger4 ,having fully explained the nature of gunpowder1 it remains to say something about the other portion1 namely1 the shot4 ,that a barrel creating explosive force1 until the charge is in the act of leaving the muzzle1 will shoot better than another which does not do this1 there cannot exist a doubt2 for this is the germ of the science4 ,also that the column of air in barrels1 where the explosive fluid is sooner expended1 acts upon the wadding1 and influences the lateral direction of the shot1 there can also be no doubt2 therefore1 more attention is requisite to this point than is generally given4 ,i am quite certain that all well-constructed barrels1 both as regards metal and exterior shape1 shoot best1 shoot so longest1 and foul or lead less1 than barrels having the aid of friction3 soft barrels require it1 no doubt1 but why make soft barrels8 ,the others cost but little more1 and the superiority admits of no question4 ,the quantity of shot is a matter of the first consequence1 and ,i think that ,i have clearly established the fact1 that the less the weight1 in proportion to the force1 the greater the speed or velocity given to that weight2 hence it follows that to be beneficial a certain quantity is suited4 ,all guns1 according to their bore and length1 will shoot a certain weight and a certain size of shot best4 ,a great deal of shot in a small bore lies too far up the barrel1 and creates an unnecessary friction2 and the shot1 by the compression at the moment of explosion1 becomes all shapes3 a circumstance which materially affects its flight4 ,if of too great a weight1 the powder has not power to drive it with that speed and force required to be efficacious1 because the weight is too great in proportion4 ,those who reason from mathematical calculation will object to this doctrine4 ,they will say1 the greater the weight the greater the effect4 ,no doubt it is so1 if thrown with a proportionate force2 but that cannot be obtained with a small gun4 ,we must adapt the weight of projectile force to the power we are in possession of2 and from many experiments1 ,i am inclined to think1 that a fourteen gauge1 two feet eight inches barrel1 should never be loaded with above one ounce and a quarter of shot 7,no4 #f will suit best71 and the utmost powder she will burn4 ,a fifteen gauge will not require more than one ounce2 and no doubt ,no4 #g would be thrown by her quite as strong as ,no4 #f by the fourteen gauge gun1 and do as much execution at forty yards with less recoil4 ,setting aside all other reasons1 ,i should1 on this account1 prefer the fifteen gauge-gun1 if both be of a length2 as ,i find as much execution can be done at the same distance with one as with the other4 ,to render a fourteen gauge barrel superior1 ,colonel ,hawker is right in stating1 that it should never be under thirty-four inches2 which description of barrel ,i very much approve4 ,he also says1 8,you cannot have closeness and strength in shooting combined1 beyond a certain degree30 an observation1 in the truth of which ,i fully concur2 it being found that where there is a greater degree of either strength or closeness1 the other requisite is always wanting4 ,neither would it be advisable1 as the sportsman will find a medium decidedly the best3 a medium that will give the shots fairly spread over a space of thirty inches diameter1 at forty yards2 and so regularly1 that a space1 which would allow a bird to escape1 shall not occur above twice out of five shots1 and each shot to penetrate through thirty sheets of paper4 ,it will be found1 that a gun doing this regularly1 is far superior to one throwing twice as close and not one-half through the paper2 as the latter will require four or five pellets to kill a bird1 when two of the other would be quite as efficacious1 on account of penetrating twice as far4 ,in favour of small shot1 ,mr4 ,daniel's observations are so pertinent1 that ,i cannot do better than quote him4 ,he says1 8,the velocity of a charge of ,no4 #g being equal 7we will say nearly7 to one of ,no4 #c at that distance 7#ce yards71 and since small shot fly thicker than large in proportion to its size2 and as there are many parts about the body of a bird1 wherein a pellet of ,no4 #g will affect its vitality equal to a pellet of ,no4 #b1 the chances by using the former are multiplied in the workman's favour2 for it is the number and not the magnitude of the particles that kills on the spot4 ,they who prefer large shot1 and accustom themselves to fire at great distances1 leave nearly as many languishing in the field as immediately die4 ,whereas1 those that use small shot1 and shoot fair1 fill their bag with little spoil or waste beyond what they take with them from the field40 ,to an old gamekeeper of his 7he tells us7 he has often put the question1 8,why he was so partial to small shot10 and his reply was1 8,sir1 they go between the feathers like pins and needles2 whilst the large shot you use1 as often glance off as penetrate them40 ,no doubt1 here ,mr4 ,daniel is as correct as may be4 ,mr4 ,blaine says1 query8 ,but he ought to be aware1 as ,i suppose he is1 though allowing himself to lose sight of principles1 that small shot can be1 and are1 propelled from the barrel with an equal velocity with the larger2 it is only in the length of range that the greater triumphs2 but if we take thirty or thirty-five yards' distance as an average1 the latter will not 8lead0 in the race4 ,therefore1 the advocates of small shot have unquestionably the better of the argument at this distance2 at greater1 ,i will not dispute it1 though ,i have picked up ,no4 #e shot #cjj yards from the spot fired from2 larger1 ,no4 #c1 rarely reaches #djj yards4 ,hard shot is not so liable to be mis-shaped1 nor does it lose its velocity by contact1 as easily as soft4 ,under the head mixed shot1 ,blaine observes1 8,we do not believe any law in projectiles can be brought forward to prove its impropriety4 ,the mass of shot is propelled by the expansive power of the powder2 it is ejected in a mass2 and when it separates1 each shot carries with it its own share of ejective force1 with very little interference with any other1 it being evident that the projectile force acting on each shot is in the proportion of its area of dimensions10 c4 ,here is a great mistake4 ,the law of projectiles is not wanted to prove its fallacy2 the laws of motion will do that4 ,if you take any number of equal or dissimilar sizes of shot1 and place it as a charge is placed in a gun barrel1 occupying #c_/d of an inch of tube1 there is1 of course1 a wadding between powder and shot2 this wadding is1 or ought to be1 a piston2 velocity is communicated to this piston by the explosion2 it does so to the shot immediately above it1 that to the layers above1 and so on until the whole mass is in motion4 ,the velocity behind the piston is increasing to a certain point1 where it ceases2 then it is that the layer farthest from the piston1 having received its maximum from the layers below1 travels quicker than its assistants2 who1 having parted with their force1 fall behind in proportion3 so does each layer1 even until the last one which received it from the piston1 having communicated so much to his friends before him1 is left without himself4 ,it is an undisputed law in motion that one body may convey to another1 by contact1 nearly its own velocity1 but in so doing1 is sure to come to rest immediately4 ,strike one billiard ball against another1 if the blow is centrical1 the ball struck receives the motion1 the other comes to rest2 and so is it with shot3 it is only the layers next the muzzle which strikes the target1 the remainder fall without travelling the same distance4 ,i have fired three balls from a rifle1 and having marked them ,i found the uppermost projected farthest1 and the others in proportion4 ,this is easily proved4 ,thus1 it is quite clear that in all charges of mixed shot1 the larger will extract the velocity from the smaller1 and consequently become useless for the purpose intended3 this fact is unquestionable4 ,in speaking of the longest duck or swivel guns1 ,i may instance ,colonel ,hawker's account of the performance of such fowling artillery4 ,it appears evident that they do not effect anything like the execution which might be expected from their immense size and capability4 ,the reason of this is obvious4 ,from the great space of the interior1 in order to receive that equal pressure on the inch which a common fowling-piece receives1 they should be charged in proportion to the increased size2 but then1 ,i scarcely need add1 they would become ungovernable4 ,in addition to this objection1 they could not be forged of malleable iron1 so as to be safe2 on account of the impossibility of forging a barrel of that weight by hand hammers1 and the little probability of hammers ever being invented to work by steam to do it sufficiently quick4 ,the greater the weight of the barrel its strength is gradually decreased1 owing to the impossibility of sufficiently beating it throughout the whole body4 ,it must be well known to any one versed in mechanics1 that an anchor-shank weighing some hundredweights is more easily broken than iron one-twentieth part of the weight1 which has had the advantage of being forged by hammers where the blows were felt through the whole mass4 ,this cannot be the case in forging large barrels1 as the workmen cannot use hammers heavy enough2 consequently the barrel is turned out of hand with the pores more open than a piece of cast iron4 ,they have tried this with large guns for the artillery1 and it has repeatedly failed1 entirely from the want of sufficient power to compress the iron4 ,all guns1 therefore1 of an unusual size1 are not of strength in proportion to a small gun2 hence the reason they cannot with safety be charged up to the corresponding scale4 ,neither are they of the length they should be1 if the bore is to be the criterion4 ,it must be remembered that to be charged in proportion1 the pressure on the inch should be as many times the pressure on the inch of the small gun1 as the one is the number of times larger than the other4 ,if we come exactly to the real state of the case1 we doubt much 7when taking into consideration the difference of surface7 that the pressure on the inch in the large gun is equal even to that on a small gun4 ,the comparison might be carried up to the largest artillery1 and ,i doubt whether it would come up to this scale2 as it is well known that the heaviest guns will not throw their projectile as far in proportion as the small gun1 because you dare not generate the force required to do it4 ,the same principle is applicable to artillery as to fowling-pieces4 ,from the above data1 ,i would say1 never make duck-guns above seven-eighths in the bore1 if you wish them to kill at a great distance2 and not less than fifteen or sixteen pounds weight1 and full four feet long2 because then you can generate strength sufficient4 ,therefore1 instead of the large stanchion-guns being one hundred pounds weight1 they should1 strictly speaking1 be two hundred1 and so on4 ,in proof of this ,i may just mention that1 upon repeated experiments1 ,i have ascertained that a double stanchion-gun1 with each barrel of the same bore1 weight1 and length1 as a single gun1 will kill further than the latter2 simply owing to the advantage of the greater weight of the double gun4 ,i have made observations1 when trying moderate-sized and shoulder duck-guns on that fine level piece of sand before spoken of1 and by tracing the grazing of the shots ,i have been enabled to pick them up4 ,the large shot from the duck-gun1 mostly ,no4 #b1 ,i found scarcely #djj yards from the spot where she was fired2 the small shot1 five and six1 from a fourteen bore1 were repeatedly picked up at #cej yards3 thus showing that the large gun had not much advantage2 but yet making probable many assertions made of killing at seventy1 eighty1 and sometimes a hundred yards1 with a common-sized gun4 ,by this it appears possible2 for shot that will fly that distance must kill1 if it hit during its flight through the first quarter of such a range2 but then1 at a single bird1 above fifty-five or sixty yards1 it is always twenty to one against hitting the object at all2 as the pellets begin to separate rapidly at that distance1 though their force is still sufficient1 and in large flocks is apt to do execution4 ,the invention of the patent wire cartridge is rather the production of a scientific mind than the production of chance2 though the invention of ,general ,shrapnell contains the principle1 and the perfection attained is but the extension of that principle3 namely1 the means of projecting a number of bodies of a similarity in size without subjecting them to an extreme jamming by the lateral expansion1 and thus allowing each to travel his allotted distance without any of his companions robbing him of his speed by impact4 ,the great peculiarity of the wire cartridge is1 that being less than the bore1 and having no bottom wadding1 the explosive fluid acts all around1 between the sides of the barrel and the net1 by what may not inaptly be termed the windage1 and the shot are thus expelled by a cushion-like force1 which does not jam or compress them in the way it is liable to by a wadding forcing it outwards4 ,here the net is of use to keep the whole in a mass2 but you must not suppose the same would be obtained by a charge of shot1 without a wadding below4 ,the net opens1 after leaving the muzzle of the gun4 ,the introduction of bone-dust is intended for1 and answers the purpose of preventing the grains of shot being mis-shaped by the compression3 during their passage up the barrel they form with the bone-dust a comparatively solid body1 and keep the pellets from impact1 thus allowing them to go forth into the atmosphere beautifully round and uninjured2 and1 as such1 more likely to travel farther and stronger4 ,the latter arrangement possesses all the science1 as the net can be dispensed with2 for it aids the combination but slightly1 and in no case more than a moderate quantity of good paper would do4 ,the science of this mechanical construction of projectiles is perfectly in keeping with all the established laws of motion1 and more particularly good in thus avoiding the necessity of lateral pressure on the sides of the tube of the gun1 the upper end having the means of better resisting the column of air in their progress outwards2 for there can be no question but this controls and induces the divergence of the shot in leaving the muzzle4 ,one of the old arrangements1 often laughed at1 ,i mean the bell muzzle in old guns1 intimates that our ancestors possessed some smattering of science2 as the relief in the muzzle of a gun has a tendency1 by allowing a gradual expansion laterally1 to keep the charge of shot better together3 for it is quite apparent that any body severely compressed for a certain distance1 expands in proportion when free of that restraint2 and the consequence is a tendency to fly off at a tangent1 as the friction of a crooked barrel induces a ball to fly in a curve contrary to the bend of the barrel4 ,the extreme relief we find in some old barrels is certainly not required2 but still it clearly shows that the principle was understood and acted upon3 the very extreme has been produced by ignorance1 as certainly as the suggestion was a proof of knowledge on the part of the suggestor2 for many think1 if a small dose is good for a patient1 a large one must be equally so4 ,like ourselves of the present day1 having discovered that fine gunpowder was advantageous1 we have carried the principle so far as undoubtedly to overstep the line to which it was beneficial we should advance2 thus clearly establishing the truth of the old adage1 8,one extreme begets another40 ,therefore1 in advocating the adoption of gun-barrels of the very essence of iron1 ,i also say1 let that part of the tube whose duty is the generating of force be nearly cylindrical1 and let there be a gradual expansion of the bore for a few inches in approaching the muzzle1 that the restraint of the lateral pressure may not be too rapidly loosened4 ,but yet let that expansion be so graduated that there shall not be an extreme either way--only a scarcely perceptible relief2 yet such as will influence and prevent the divergence of the projectiles to a considerable extent4 ,blaine says--8,a very long barrel is liable to have the force of its discharge lessened by the increase of counter pressure in the greater volume of internal air in a long than in a short barrel40 ,the column of air in the barrel is unquestionably calculated to lessen the force of the discharge4 ,but ,i have already shown that this is completely controlled by the system of granulation4 ,further1 he says--8,its force must also suffer by the loss which the elasticity of the propelling gas experiences in its lengthened transit through an extended range of barrel40 ,he is here supposing an instantaneous generation of force1 which cannot possibly happen2 and if it did1 would be comparatively useless4 ,but he is evidently on the right scent1 if he could only follow it up4 ,again1--8,in such cases1 it is probable1 that the shot1 which should leave the mouth of the piece at the instant when the propelling force has gained its maximum1 in a long barrel are detained beyond that particular limit of capacity we have pointed out as inherent in each barrel2 and which properties1 and which quantities of charge1 nothing but repeated and varied trials can teach the owner of the gun40 ,this is an excellent illustration of the 8theory0 of the resistance of the column of air in long barrels with very fine quickly-burnt powder2 and could he have pointed out the cause1 the explanation would have been perfect2 as it must be quite apparent to the reader that it is not the length of barrel which is in fault1 but a want of a continuous producing force in the powder2 for when all the charge is exploded1 the maximum has been obtained4 ,this clearly proves that the charge was too small to keep up that maximum1 or that the grain of the powder was too fine1 and thus too quickly expended4 ,there is no discrepancy between the fact of long barrels being preferable half a century ago1 and short ones now2 for it is in the improvement of gunpowder burning in half the time now that it did then1 and leaves the question of length of barrel precisely where it has ever been4 ,you may have any length you like in moderation1 if you suit the grain of powder to it4 ,i am quite satisfied to steer between extremes2 avoiding alike too small a charge of projectiles and too wide a calibre with too heavy a charge of the former1 and preferring a size of bore that gives1 under all circumstances1 the greatest range with the least amount of explosive material2 which neither requires that to be too fine a grain1 nor too coarse3 namely1 a bore of fifteen and two feet six inches long4 ,under all the above circumstances combined1 this size will long hold a position in the front rank of sporting guns4 ,the ,belgians have long been1 and still are1 our principal competitors in supplying those parts of the world which do not rank gun manufacturing among their staple trade4 ,the cost of labour being small1 they have great facilities for producing cheap material2 and the extent to which they tempt the eye of those inexperienced in gunnery is quite obvious to the world2 but excepting the cheapness of the lower grade of guns1 the ,belgian products are not at all to be placed on an equality with the well made ,english manufacture4 ,in consequence of the relaxation of our custom laws1 foreign gunnery is now admitted at ten per cent4 duty2 and as soon as this change was made1 the ,belgians sent large quantities of their guns and pistols to ,london2 whence they found their way through different parts of the country4 ,regular establishments were opened for the sale of their very highly ornamented barrels3 ten different varieties were produced1 even to the imitation of laminated steel4 ,these barrels were at first sent in the bored and ground state1 in large quantities2 their apparent low price and great beauty quite captivated some of the 8,brums10 so that for a period they were all the rage2 and the ,belgians began to boast of the extensive trade they were doing4 ,but nothing in this world runs smooth4 8,the best laid schemes of mice and men oft gang agee20 and so it was with the ,belgian importations4 ,our proof was not exactly to their liking1 or perhaps the iron was not equal to the proof2 losses and discoveries began to accumulate3 8,too soft1 by far10 says one2 8,they are all plated10 says another2 8,filed it through1 by jingo60 exclaimed a third2 8,common iron1 by all that's wonderful60 protested a fourth2 8,oh1 twisted iron1 under such inimitable ,damascus60 growled a fifth3 in short1 steel over iron turned out to be the secret of the whole business4 ,it is very probable that such facts as these soon established the inferiority of 8the beautiful ,damascus and arabesque0 of the ,belgian manufacturers2 and they have1 ,i trust1 disappeared for ever from the ,english market3 at least1 they are not held in estimation by those qualified to judge4 ,their advocates have for years adduced the fact1 that the ,belgian laws required guns to be twice proved2 and our old laws not requiring this1 they had certainly a tangible argument2 but our improved proof laws have now removed that anomaly1 and certainly our proof is now much superior1 even to that of the ,belgians3 so much so1 indeed1 that ,i have now before me a letter from a ,belgian barrel maker1 who1 in reply to the inquiry why he did not send any more barrels1 says very truly1 8your ,english proof is too severe40 ,a very carefully conducted experiment on at least twenty best ,belgian barrels1 satisfied me of the indisputable fact1 that at least nineteen out of the twenty were plated1 and principally on twisted iron of the softest description2 as was shown by eating it entirely away1 by a lengthened immersion in a solution of the sulphate of copper4 ,this may be done in the course of a few hours1 leaving the ,damascus1 and the arabesque plating comparatively untouched4 ,the production of that extremely beautiful figure has to be effected by using metals of considerable dissimilarity in their state of carbonization2 the iron evidently being entirely decarbonized before mixing with the steel1 and the steel even appearing extremely soft2 although1 no doubt1 much of this would be effected during the heating of the barrels to solder with brass3 and it is well known this cannot be done1 except by heating them to nearly a white heat4 ,as this is the universal practice with all barrels which the ,belgians finish1 a good shooting gun is1 by all fixed laws of science1 a scarcity with them4 ,but a point of still greater importance arises from this injurious proceeding4 ,in the act of heating two tubes like gun barrels1 it is an impossibility to heat them equally1 so that neither shall be at a higher temperature than the other2 and again in lifting them from the furnace1 and in cooling1 all are subject to bend by expansion and contraction alone2 the result is that perfectly straight ,belgian hard soldered barrels are utterly unattainable4 ,to an unpractised eye the bending in and out appears trifling1 but professionally1 it is a very serious defect indeed2 and on that score alone1 the ,belgian can never compete in quality with our own manufacture4 ,time1 however1 will no doubt remedy this2 already they are great imitators1 and they will1 no doubt1 become greater4 ,they are competitors whom respectable manufacturers need not fear2 and though they eschew the imitation of our higher quality1 they imitate1 even to the name1 the 8marks0 of our leading makers4 ,i still would welcome and fraternize with them1 as highly skilled workers in elaborate mixtures of metals suitable for ornamental gun-barrels4 ,the ,french gunmakers have not yet realized the true value of the shooting of their fowling-pieces4 ,this arises1 in a great measure1 no doubt1 from the want of a proper field for improvement4 ,necessity has always been an important improver1 and wild game creating the necessity for good guns in ,england1 a different direction has been given to the manufacturer1 owing to the continual cry for long killing guns2 and not a doubt can exist that ,english guns are better constructed for that purpose1 than those of any other country4 ,attention to the shooting has always been the first study of every ,english gunmaker1 and great progress has been made during the last twenty years2 indeed1 a comparison between the largest 8target0 of to-day1 and the best that ,colonel ,hawker ever made with his crack ,joe ,manton1 will show a progressive improvement of nearly #ajj per cent41 not only in closeness of shooting1 but also in penetration4 ,all this may not be due entirely to the gun1 but in part to the gunpowder2 and to the sensible course we now pursue of using less weight of shot1 avoiding artificial friction in the barrels1 instead of increasing it to retard the shot with the view of increasing its power3 also by having the expellant agent accelerative to the greatest extent1 closeness and strength of shooting are obtained1 with the least amount of recoil possible4 ,our ,french competitors have paid much more attention to the artistic decoration of their guns than to their usefulness2 and the universal result of this sort of proceeding1 ever since the invention of gunnery1 has been a total neglect of their power of extreme projection4 ,the metal1 like other portions of their work is1 in all cases1 manipulated with a view to beauty only2 as the fact of their veneering1 or plating1 their barrels proves4 ,if at all masters of the science1 they must be aware that this weakens the shooting of the barrels1 and is an injurious practice4 ,but the greater fact remains1 that they continue to fix all their barrels together1 by brasing them with brass from end to end1 as they do in ,belgium2 thus lessening the strength of the barrels in point of safety1 and nearly destroying any smart shooting power they might have possessed4 ,the ,french appear to me to have only reached that stage of progress which we attained forty years ago1 when every intelligent mechanic was seeking after that 8useless thing10 even when attained1 8a perfect safety gun20 which1 from its complex character1 might have been designated 8the dangerous gun20 indeed1 experience taught 7though not without great cost7 that few would use it when attained1 and the consequence was that it fell into disuse4 ,our ,continental neighbours1 however1 are mining it with great energy4 ,a little more of our experience1 and they1 also1 will see the folly of the attempt4 ,all the facts go clearly to establish the truth of the assertion1 that for all useful purposes they are half a century behind us in the essential part of gun manufacturing4 ,the anxiety shown by all leading ,continental sportsmen to obtain a first-class ,english gun1 and more especially of laminated steel1 is very strong evidence in support of this assertion4 ,all the guns ,i exhibited in ,paris in #ahee were eagerly bought up at high figures2 and ,i have since executed many orders for ,france1 ,austria1 ,prussia1 ,sardinia1 and ,russia1 as well as for other northern states4 ,the display of artistically constructed guns by the ,french makers in their ,great ,exposition of #ahee1 was very great1 and by certain classes of sportsmen would be considered superb4 ,my notes1 made at the time of inspection1 will show better than a description can do1 in what state of transition their manufacture is1 and how they vacillate between their old and our present style3-- ,parisian gunmakers presented #cf2 ,rheims1 #a2 ,st4 ,etienne1 #ad4 ,leopold ,bernard1 barrel-maker4--,very good work2 barrels made of two spirals1 inner and outer1 with the twist running the reverse way2 fine figure2 mixture of steel and iron4 ,monsieur ,gauvain4--,very good sound work2 all highly artistic2 the cock formed so as to resemble a tree with a snake coiled round it1 the head of the snake striking on the nipple4 ,several other guns of the latest ,english patterns4 ,monsieur ,beringer4--,guns ornamented arabesque2 a medium show of work2 principally breech-loaders4 ,monsieur ,caron4--,showy1 ornamental1 very middling4 ,lepage and ,moutier4--,work good1 ornamented1 principally arabesque4 ,game and ,english scroll pattern1 engraving1 cocks1 c41 but inferior to the ,english patterns of ,gauvain4 ,houllier ,blanchard4--,good work2 designs ,english2 a very novel pattern of figure in the barrels4 ,monsieur ,le ,perrin4--,all his guns artistic2 raised1 embossed1 artistic1 ornamental1 heavy cocks to imitate my shape2 one good ,english pattern soft gun4 ,monsieur ,lain4--,good sound work2 ,english pattern of twenty years ago4 ,monsieur ,andr4--,good work2 ornaments embossed2 8,devisme0 inlaying2 carving and embossing unequalled2 several ,english pattern guns1 but of the standard twenty years ago4 8,thomas40--,guns well inlaid2 work medium4 ,albert ,benard1 barrel-maker4--,iron very good1 but all lined2 bar apparently reduced from a mass two inches square1 which tenuates the figure extremely1 as the bars are only #a_/d inch thick4 ,gastienne ,renette4--,all highly artistically ornamented2 work good1 carving very elaborate4 ,a novel mode of breech-loading3 a piece on hinge turns out1 a cartridge1 slides in return to its place1 and a quoin like a wedge forces it up into a chamber2 the wedge and head receiving all the force of the recoil4 ,lenoir1 barrel-maker4--,iron very good2 thirty rods in a faggot #e #f1 and welded and drawn down into #c_/h of an inch square3 an enormous elongation of the fibres4 ,doye4--,good ,english pattern-work--nothing else4 ,fontereau4--,work1 all ,english pattern2 very good4 ,m4 ,brunn1 successor to ,armand and ,bourbon4--,highly embossed work3 a novel breech-loader2 artistic design for cock2 female figures with fishes' tails in scroll on to the tumbler4 ,guerin4--,a novel safety guard2 locks while on the nipple at half cock1 and full cock2 swivel double like a split ring4 ,may4--,a novel safety guard1 very likely to break the finger3 sure to do it if on an ,english gun4 ,breech-loader3 central fire1 the same as now made by ,lancaster4 ,loger1 barrel-maker4--,bars faggoted #f #b1 and so formed to imitate laminated steel4 ,dufour4--,all breech-loading guns2 but all work of the first class4 ,juelle ,magana1 barrel-maker1 ,st4 ,etienne4--,barrels well fitted and figure varying1 but not possessing the regularity observed in the ,belgian barrels4 ,chapellon4--,coutereau4--,exhibit some barrels filled1 with a charge of #ab inches of powder1 #f-a_/b inches of shot1 and warrant them not to burst on firing that charge4 ,delabourse1 ,paris4--,good work 8 la ,purdey40 ,lefaucheaux1 ,paris1 prize medalist1 #ahea4--;,good embossed work2 breech-loaders2 also very good imitation of ,english work4 ,such is a fair sample of the whole4 ,but the best work by far is that by ,gauvain1 though not so highly estimated by the jury2 but that is in many cases no test of ability whatever--as much depends upon the influence and standing of the individual4 ,great exhibitions are calculated to effect great good if properly carried out4 ,in that of the ,english exhibitors at ,paris nothing could be more reprehensible1 for the jurors left them to the tender mercies of their foreign competitors4 ,in the case of the gun-makers1 nothing could be worse1 for the two jurymen appointed by the ,english ,government never1 ,i believe1 saw a gun1 home-made or foreign2 and the fact of my obtaining two first-class medals speaks much for the impartiality of our ,continental brethren4 ,,recoil4 ,recoil varies according to the position of the gun2 when fired on the horizontal1 the resistance to be overcome is the tendency of the projectile to fall to the earth1 and its friction as it moves in a line parallel to the earth4 ,when the muzzle is elevated this resistance is increased1 because the force generated by the explosion of the gunpowder has to exert its action more directly in opposition to the direction of the force of gravity2 and when this force is exerted in a line directly opposed to the centre of gravity1 as it is when the gun is fired vertically1 then the recoil is doubled1 and is made more painful1 because the body resting on the earth cannot yield4 ,a gun fired in the direction of the earth1 or in the line of the centre of gravity1 would recoil much less 7perhaps fifty per cent4 less7 than when fired vertically2 from the very obvious fact1 that if the bullet was not kept in position by its friction on the sides of the barrel1 it would fall to the ground of itself4 8,the recoil of a gun is inseparable from a discharge of its contents--on the broad principle that action begets reaction2 it is1 therefore1 only when the #8kick1' as it is called1 becomes painful1 that it is essential to avoid or lessen it4 ,irregularity in the bore of the barrel is a very common source of violent recoil2 contracted breeches also1 but more than all1 the contraction of the barrel at its centre1 occasion recoil1 and that of the most dangerous kind3 the expanding flame1 during its ignition1 presses violently to make its way through the contracted to the wider part1 thus also destroying the expelling force4 #8,now1 action and reaction being equal1 it follows1 that the weight of the piece being the same1 the recoil will be in proportion to the quantity of the powder1 and the weight of the ball1 or shot2 and that with the same charge the recoil will be in proportion to the weight of the piece1 or the lighter the piece the greater the recoil4'0--,essay on ,shooting4 ,here is a true exposition of recoil1 though not of contractions in the breech2 for there the action would not be directly back1 but have an inclination towards the muzzle2 for the reaction would not have time to tell on the breech1 before the charge was out of the muzzle4 ,an extremely spiralled rifle barrel destroys the explosive force of gunpowder1 but the effects are not felt in the recoil1 being most all expended laterally4 ,blaine says1 8,could we entirely obviate all recoil from a gun1 we should not only remove an unpleasant shock to our persons1 but there is reason to believe we should much assist the range and force of the shot likewise2 although there is an opinion prevalent1 that the degree of the recoil is in the proportion of the projectile force40 ,of this1 however1 some doubts are entertained1 which are warranted by the following fact3--8,mortars with iron beds immoveably fixed in the earth throw their shot to greater distances than guns which are affixed to carriages can do1 and which1 therefore1 can recoil4 ,this has been incontestibly proved1 both in large and small artillery4 ,having suspended a gun barrel1 charged with a determinate quantity of shot1 from the ceiling by two cords1 so as to allow of its recoil1 fire it point blank at a target1 and mark the result accurately4 ,now1 fix the same barrel to a block1 and charge it exactly with a similar charge2 then having moved the target fifteen yards further1 fire the barrel2 it is probable that the last shot1 though at this increased distance1 will exceed the former1 both in range and force4' ,these and such like experiments are laughed at by the giddy and inconsiderate2 but it is by these illustrations that the most important facts are brought to light4 8,projectile force is1 therefore1 to be increased by resistance2 and the knowledge of this fact offers us a practical hint1 that when we stand immoveable to our shot1 not only by holding the gun tightly to our shoulder1 but by also leaning somewhat forward in our shooting attitude1 we considerably increase the resistance1 and1 consequently1 we not only lessen the shock of the recoil to ourselves1 but we aid the force of the shot and extend its range4 ,that such is the case1 may be further exemplified by the following experiment3--,throw a hand-ball against any moveable body1 and it will displace that body2 but the ball will drop to the ground perpendicularly1 however hard the body against which it is thrown may be4 ,fix the same body securely1 and then the rebound of the ball will be nearly equal to the force with which it was thrown40 ,the weight or amount of force with which a gun recoils against the shoulder1 is due to1 and regulated by1 several circumstances4 ,the first and most important is the amount of explosive force generated before the charge is moved and during the act of moving1 and the amount of inertia in the body of the projectile4 ,when a quantity of gunpowder is exploded without any resisting weight in front of it1 then the column of air gives comparatively a slight recoil2 though there is1 in fact1 considerable recoil1 but such as is due to the resistance of the air only1 and1 consequently1 more like a push than a blow4 ,the exact amount of recoil is also due to the difference between1 or proportionate weights of1 the charge of shot or bullet and the gun2 action and reaction being always equal until one or the other body moves2 the division then will be in favour of that moving fastest1 and hence the obtaining of accelerative velocity3 it thus follows1 as a truism1 that the smaller the quantity of exploded gases that can be employed to first move the charge1 the less the recoil4 ,the advantage of the granulation system is here again most clearly shown2 and 7alluding again to the law of putting matter in motion gradually7 if you would gain the greatest benefit1 it is clear that1 in the same length of tube1 you would1 at the termination of the accelerative power1 have gained a much greater amount of velocity than could be obtained under any other circumstances with the more violently explosive gunpowder4 ,many theories have been advanced1 and many conjectures made as to the cause of the recoil of guns2 and it must be evident that the causes vary with the form of gun1 with the nature of the gunpowder1 and the weight2 or peculiar arrangement of the shot or bullet4 ,for instance1 an ounce of shot1 and an ounce of lead in the form of a round bullet1 fired from the same gun would give two very different amounts of recoil1 when measured by the spring cushion2 the ounce bullet not giving much more than half the recoil produced by the ounce of shot4 ,this is owing to the simple fact that the bullet being a compact body1 offers only the resistance of its weight1 and the simple friction of sliding or rolling along the barrel according as it is tight or loose2 but the tendency of the hundreds of shot corns is to 8jam and wedge0 in the most extreme manner1 offering1 by their lateral pressure against the sides of the barrel1 the greatest amount of friction and reluctance to be driven out3 hence the reaction on the gun1 and thence on the shoulder of the shooter2 and the smaller the size of shot the greater the jamming4 ,again1 the same weight of shot1 fired from a #af-;bore and a #ab-;bore will recoil much more in the smaller than in the larger bore1 even when all other points are equal2 because the charge reaches higher in the #af-;bore1 thus offering at first a greater amount of inertia4 ,secondly1 there is also more tendency to jam2 and1 thirdly1 the extension of the surface of lateral pressure on the tubes of the barrel must also add to recoil4 ,dirty guns1 it is well known1 kick violently1 simply from the greater friction1 or difficulty of the matter of the charge being put in motion4 ,the question as to what the actual amount of recoil really is has never been settled satisfactorily2 the most erroneous opinions have been given1 and assertions equally erroneous have been made1 by those who have attended to the subject4 ,to clearly elucidate this question1 it is absolutely necessary that the circumstances be reduced to one standard3 but the difficulty is to obtain that2 for it would vary according to muscular development1 the weight and height of the sportsman4 ,indeed any principle laid down would be liable to be disputed1 from the very different way in which every sportsman lifts his gun to his shoulder3 if one presses it against his shoulder with a pressure equal to #e lbs41 he will receive a certain amount of recoil2 he that presses it with a force equal to #aj lbs4 will receive less2 and with a pressure of #cj lbs4 it will be found to yield the least of all4 ,i will illustrate it in this way4 ,take a spring cushion 7something like the spring machine found at all fairs for testing the force of a man pressing against it71 if you allow a gun to recoil against this when the starting pressure is only #e lbs41 it will drive it up to #gj lbs41 or nearly so1 from the velocity with which you have put the #g lbs4 of matter which is contained in the gun into a long sweeping blow4 ,the next time you try1 put the starting point at #aj lbs41 and you will find a much less result in the extreme weight denoted2 but carry on this experiment1 placing the cushion with a resisting force of #cj lbs41 and you will find the extreme recoil indicated at from #dj lbs4 to #de lbs41 and even up to a higher starting resistance4 ,but to this extent it is not advisable to go1 for the strain becomes too great on the handle of the gun-stock1 and there is too near an apparent approach to a solid resistance1 which it is well-known would break the best stock that was ever made4 ,having shown how we may approximately obtain the exact amount of force1 and how it may1 even with two persons1 give different results1 ,i will now state what ,i have found to be the result of many hundreds of trials made with the view of deciding this question4 ,before doing so1 however1 ,i will further premise that hundreds of attempts have been made at various times by different ,governments1 and by many talented men1 to obtain a correct recoil machine which shall efficiently measure the recoil1 and in such a perfect line with the intended direction of the projectile as to obtain accurate results3 but this is found to be perfectly unattainable1 though ,i believe the nearest approach to it has been made by ,mr4 ,whitworth during his experiments with the hexagonal rifle4 ,to prove that it is impossible to get all the circumstances alike1 so as accurately to ascertain the exact force of the recoil1 one instance only need be cited4 ,fire your gun at a fixed object1 then fire at an object in motion1 and to your senses the recoil will appear double when fired at the fixed object2 but it is not really so3 in the latter instance1 the body of the person firing the gun1 and the gun itself being in motion1 a considerable amount of the force of the recoil is absorbed in overcoming the motion of the gun1 and then that of the shooters body1 so that the effect is not noticed4 ,i have already alluded to the greater force of recoil felt from the lighter pressure of the gun against the shoulder2 here the tendency of the gun and body moving in one direction is to close them together1 and the proportion will be as the velocity of that movement4 ,therefore1 to bring this to a conclusion1 ,i find that under ordinary circumstances a #ab-;bore gun of #g-a_/b lbs4 weight1 #cj inches in length1 with a charge of #b-a_/b drams of ,no4 #e grained gunpowder1 and #a-a_/d oz4 shot1 the barrels draw-bored cylindrically1 with the least possible easing at the breech ends1 and metal of the best laminated steel1 will recoil with a force of from #dj lbs4 to #dh lbs41 or on an average #dd lbs43 this is the most satisfactory conclusion ,i have been able to draw from my experiments4 ,this of course will vary1 as ,i have shown2 and it is also liable to deviations1 according to the state of the atmosphere1 and other collateral circumstances4 ,great variations will of course arise from guns of fine or rough insides2 guns new or old1 well kept or neglected2 and in guns bored larger at the breech-ends1 in order to give artificial resistance to the escape of the charge4 ,these last are now1 ,i trust1 obsolete1 except in that abortion of science the 8,french breech-loading crutch gun20 and as an exception1 all ill-constructed guns4 ,the science of the question may now be regarded as clearly established4 ,gun-barrels of the utmost tenacity1 with insides of a cylindrical form as true as possible1 polished as fine as a mirror1 with a moderate weight of shot calculated to suit the gun and a good charge of large granulated gunpowder1 will give the greatest killing power1 with the greatest amount of comfort1 or absence of recoil1 that is to be found in the pursuit of shooting4 ,a point of considerable importance in obtaining regular and good shooting--one1 however1 which is frequently neglected--is that of ascertaining what sized shot is particularly suited to the size of bore used4 ,the correct adaptation of ,no4 #e or ,no4 #f for your particular gun is easily attained4 ,place in the muzzle an ordinary wadding1 press it into the barrel the depth of the diameter of the shot1 which should be exactly flush with the muzzle1 place as many shot corns on this as you can1 without having more than one distinct layer1 and observe the size that best fills1 in concentric rings1 the whole circumference of the bore1 leaving no half-spaces unfilled2 note whether it be ,no4 #e or ,no4 #f shot1 and keep to that size for your general shooting4 ,again1 on other occasions you may wish to use larger shot 7,nos4 #d1 #c1 or #b72 then ascertain by the same method which fills the concentric rings most perfectly3 the same should be done with the smaller sizes1 ,nos4 #h or #i4 ,the rationale of this proceeding is that any half-spaces are filled by shot from above pressed in upon the lower layer1 disfiguring itself and those it comes into contact with2 this is multiplied up to the #ac or #ad layers of which the charge is composed1 and the inevitable result is that four or five pellets are pressed together until they adhere2 either 8balling0 or leaving empty spaces in the distribution of the charge1 to the injury of the gun's shooting--a defect which may easily be obviated by attending to the instructions given above4 ,one other point may be observed1 viz41 that if #a-a_/d give #ae-a_/b layers of shot in concentric rings1 the charge should be reduced until the rings are complete1 for the half-layer will do much mischief by its unequal pressure on the layers beneath it4 ,and it is further necessary to observe that in loading a gun1 either with powder or with shot1 the gun should be kept as nearly in the upright position as possible3 the more upright the gun is held1 the more perfectly will it be charged1 and the more perfect will be its shooting4 ,a vast number of useless changes have of late years been introduced into the construction of gunnery2 they have died1 however1 a natural death1 as they ought to have done1 and have thus afforded additional evidence that sportsmen of the present day only adopt what are really improvements4 ,great professional reputation in a gunmaker is not now1 as formerly1 all that is required to command a trial of individual plans of improvement3 the improvement must be self-evident2 nothing being taken on trust3 a bon fide benefit to the sportsman is essential in the present day to obtain patronage4 ,there has lately been introduced a very novel improvement in the construction of double gun barrels1 in order to overcome that defect long admitted to exist in firing the second shot4 ,it has long been known that in a #dj yards' flight1 shot falls several inches2 and it is an established fact that few sportsmen can kill with the second shot so well as with the first1 although it is certainly within range of the gun4 ,this no doubt arises in almost every case1 from the shot having fallen below the object in traversing the greater distance2 or1 in other words1 the second barrel1 in order to kill as well as the first1 ought be fired six inches higher2 but this the best shots find it difficult to do1 and it has therefore been proposed to do it for them4 ,mr4 ,f4 ,w4 ,prince1 of ,no4 #ach1 ,bond-street1 has patented an improvement to obviate this difficulty2 this he does by elevating or pointing upward the second barrel1 so as to cover the calculated fall in the body of the shot2 and the result is1 that the second bird is as well aimed at and as efficiently killed as the first4 ,the alteration is so exceedingly simple1 and the benefit resulting from it so apparent1 that the only wonder is that it should never have been done before2 and it being the improvement of a really practical sportsman of the very first class1 as ,mr4 ,prince has long been known to be1 is sufficient to stamp his invention as worthy of every consideration4 ,,chapter ,,viii4 ,,the ,,french 8,,crutch10 ,,or ,,breech-,,loading ,,shot ,,gun4 ,sporting in ,france has never been brought to the same state of perfection as in this country4 ,grouse-shooting on our wild romantic hills is a very different sport from quail1 partridge1 or rabbit shooting in the vales and on the hills of the ,continent4 ,wild game requires great energy and perseverance on the part of the sportsman1 courage and strength on the part of the dog1 and last1 though not least1 great capacity on the part of the gun4 ,for many years the superiority of the ,english manufactured gun1 as well as of the ,english gunpowder1 and the matchless skill of the ,english sportsman1 have been acknowledged by all the world4 ,all things1 however1 have their limits--the longest lane has a turning1 and a very plausible and insidious innovation has been made to detract from the acquired reputation of the ,english sportsman1 and render his shooting inferior to that of some of our friends on the other side of the ,channel4 ,the ,french system of breech-loading fire-arms is a specious pretence1 the supposed advantages of which have been loudly boasted of2 but none of these advantages have as yet been established by its most strenuous advocates4 ,how it is that the ,british sportsman has become the dupe of certain men who set themselves up for reputable gunmakers ,i know not4 ,it is certain1 however1 that by these acts they have forfeited all claim to the confidence of their too confiding customers1 and that they never could have tested the shooting properties of their guns4 ,with regard to the safety of these guns1 they display an utter want of the most ordinary judgment2 and this is abundant proof that they considered neither their safety1 nor 7what is also of importance7 the economy of the whole arrangement1 as regards their manufacture or their use4 ,guns are perfect only so long as they possess the power of shooting strong and close1 with the least available charges4 ,the period has passed when barrels were bored by rule of thumb1 without any well-defined intention2 the workman being ignorant as to whether he would have the bore of the barrel cylindrical1 or 7as was frequently the case7 in the form of two inverted cones1 and thus he continued to bore at the barrel until it was utterly useless1 or until by chance he hit upon a tidy shooting bore4 ,barrels are now constructed so nearly alike1 that it is no stretch of truth to assert that ninety-six or ninety-eight barrels out of a hundred can be made so nearly alike in their shooting1 as to render it very difficult to discover the real difference between them4 ,yet1 in the face of this high state of perfection certain ,english gunmakers introduce1 and recommend to their patrons as an improvement1 a description of gun possessing the following negative qualities3--,first1 there is no possibility of a breech-loader ever shooting equal to a well-constructed muzzle loader2 secondly1 the gun is unsafe1 and becomes more and more unsafe from the first time it is used2 and1 thirdly1 it is a very costly affair1 both as regards the gun and ammunition4 ,nor are these negative qualities at all compensated for by any of the advantages claimed for these guns by their advocates2 this assertion ,i now proceed to establish4 ,in the first place recoil has been an important obstacle to contend with1 ever since the invention of fire-arms1 and the methods of lessening recoil have engaged the special attention of all inventors up to the present day2 on this important point1 indeed1 very much depends4 ,gunnery is good only when recoil exists in a minimum degree4 ,force1 whether it be that of the gentle 8zephyr10 or of the mammoth steam-boiler which is capable of moving thousands of tons1 can always be measured1 and the friction of steam against the tube through which it passes can be measured also4 ,the time was1 when guns were so imperfectly constructed1 that the recoil and friction of the charge against the barrel destroyed more than half the force generated by the explosion of the gunpowder2 and this loss of force having been obviated1 by finely polishing the interior of the barrel1 as well as by improving the metal of the gun1 has rendered ,english guns superior in their performance to those manufactured in any other country4 ,breeches of a conical form offer the greatest resistance to the action of ariform bodies in a direct line2 this is the principle of what is best known as 8the patent breech30 to speak of which would be a waste of time1 as nothing more is required to support its superiority than the fact1 that in well constructed artillery of every country1 the interior form of the breech or chamber is more or less conical4 ,thus we see that by adopting the crutch gun1 we have to give up one of the oldest and most universally acknowledged principles in lessening recoil--namely1 the conical form of the breech--and to adopt the very reverse of this3 namely1 the old right-angled1 flat-faced breech1 upon which recoil can exert its utmost force with the certainty of its reaching the shoulder of the unfortunate user4 ,secondly1 to enable the gun to be loaded with a cartridge which shall keep its place1 a complicated arrangement is necessary4 ,on inspection of the barrel1 it will be perceived that a cavity has been formed larger than the bore of the barrel1 and that this in some cases only tapers toward the further end4 ,this cavity exactly receives the cartridge1 and the gunpowder is inflamed in a space much larger than the barrel1 which it has afterwards to pass through4 ,the charge of shot is also started in a larger space than that which it afterwards has to traverse1 and the column must of necessity become contracted and elongated before it can escape from the barrel4 ,the first consideration is at what cost of force is all this effected8 ,thirty per cent4 would certainly be a shrewd guess2 and who is there conversant with the nature of gunpowder hardy enough to gainsay the fact8 ,i here present the reader with the measurement of a pair of barrels--bore #ab1 diameter of the cavity #aj1 or two sizes difference1--tried at the celebrated trial of ,breech versus ,muzzle-loading fire-arms1 which took place in ,april last1 in the court at ,cremorne4 ,the following are the results of the trial3-- ,class #a comprised twelve bore double guns1 not exceeding #g-a_/b lbs4 in weight2 the charge for the breech-loaders was three drachms of powder1 and one ounce and a quarter of shot2 that for the muzzle-loaders1 two and three-quarter drachms of powder1 and an ounce and a quarter of shot4 ,the question will be asked why were both not charged alike8 and the answer is1 because the advocates for breech-loaders well knew the loss of power caused by the enlarged breech end would require a larger quantity of powder2 yet1 with this advantage1 the result was a verdict in favour of the muzzle-loaders of nearly two to one4 ,i quote from the ,field4 ,the aggregate number of pellets in the targets from breech-loaders was #agj1 the penetration #ai4 ,the aggregate number of pellets put in by the muzzle-loaders was #bca1 the penetration #dh2 and this was effected with a quarter of a drachm of powder less4 ,few will doubt that this must be the inevitable result4 ,force cannot be expended and retained3 we 8cannot eat our cake and have it40 ,if force is destroyed by friction1 it is as useless as if it had never been generated4 ,so much1 then1 for the shooting qualities of the breech-loader4 ,and now comes the question1 of much more importance than the shooting qualities of these guns3 namely1 can all this force--#cj per cent41 in fact1 of the whole charge--be thrown away with no worse result than the mere wasting of the powder8 ,is there no change taking place in the barrel of the gun every time it is discharged8 ,iron and its combinations are as certainly limited in their duration as is human life itself4 ,every bar of iron is capable only of resisting a certain amount of pressure2 every successive strain on its fibres deteriorating it more rapidly2 and whether it be the mainspring of the lock1 or a gun-barrel itself1 a certain number of strains will destroy it4 ,this being the case1 how much more rapidly must a breech-loader be destroyed where #cj per cent4 of the charge is always 8absorbed0 on the sides of the barrel in the cavity alone4 ,this a lengthened experiment will prove2 though the fact is so self-evident1 that no experiment is required to demonstrate it4 ,caution in gunnery is absolutely necessary under the most favourable circumstances1 and disregard of perfection in the construction of a gun is quite unpardonable2 then what shall be said of that member of society who1 with all those facts before him1 can say to his customers1 8,i advise you to have a breech-loader3 they are really good guns80 ,in what estimation such a tradesman must be held ,i will not venture to say4 ,much more might fairly be said against these guns1 but ,i sum up the whole in the following damnatory sentence3 ,breech-loaders do not shoot nearly so well1 and are not half so safe1 as muzzle-loading guns4 ,it is said1 and truly1 that a breech-loader can be charged more rapidly than a muzzle-loader2 but ,i hold this to be no advantage1 for this reason3 all guns can be loaded more quickly than they are fired1 and the tendency of all barrels to absorb heat1 puts a limit to rapidity of firing2 indeed1 after ten rapid shots with each barrel1 both guns would be about on an equality4 ,another question is1 can breech-loaders be used longer than muzzle-loading guns1 without cleaning8 ,my opinion is1 they cannot4 ,at the trial already spoken of1 after twenty-two shots had been fired from the breech-loaders1 the cartridge-cases had to be extracted from the barrels with a hook1 and in several cases it was necessary to cut them out with a knife2 whilst a muzzle-loading gun without friction would have gone on to a hundred shots without being wiped out4 ,there are few plans or presumed improvements which have not some redeeming points2 but in the case of breech-loading fire-arms it is quite a task to find even a resemblance to one4 ,all the advocates for breech-loaders whom ,i have ever met with yield1 with this acknowledgment3 8,i must admit that ,i never liked them2 but so many gentlemen are asking for them that ,i was compelled to make them1 to keep my customers40 ,this is1 no doubt1 the truth2 but it is calculated to lead to serious calamities3 for it was apparent to hundreds1 at the ,cremorne trials1 that even the best and newest breech-loading guns permitted an escape of gas at the breech to an extent that ,i never thought possible2 and if this occurs in new guns1 what will happen after a single season's shooting1 should any one be found sufficiently reckless to use a breech-loader so long8 ,no fear need be entertained that the use of breech-loaders will become general2 manufactures on false principles soon show themselves worthless1 however pertinaciously they may be puffed off4 ,the number of accidents arising from the use of breech-loading fire-arms has not been very great as yet2 though ,i have already heard of several very serious cases1 from the use of well-made guns3 let us consider what would be result if the workmanship was inferior8 ,there is one other point to which ,i may briefly allude before dismissing the breech-loader to the 8tomb of all the ,capulets40 ,the majority of guns on this principle merely abut against a false breech2 and1 from the fact of there being no connection either by hook or by cohesion1 the explosion causes a separation between the barrel and the breech to an extent which would scarcely be credited4 ,this may1 however1 be satisfactorily demonstrated by binding a small string of gutta percha round the joint1 when after explosion the string will be found to have fallen in between the barrel and the breech2 thus showing that the muzzle droops in the act of being discharged1 which must must materially influence the correctness of fire4 ,the recoil of an ordinary #ab-;bore gun1 loaded at the muzzle1 varies from forty to forty-eight pounds1 seldom exceeding the latter2 that of a breech-loader varies from sixty-eight to seventy-six6 ,and this quite independently of the enormous force which is exerted on the sides of these enlarged breech guns4 ,the shoulder left in the barrel1 too1 is a formidable barrier for the charge to pass by2 and1 in doing this1 the circle of shot in immediate contact with the barrel becomes disfigured and misshaped1 so as to insure its flight only to a very short distance4 ,in the muzzle-loader an average of #ahj shots strike a target of two feet six inches diameter2 but breech-loaders of the same calibre will rarely put in #abj shots2 showing a clear loss of #fj pellets4 ,this is due to the enormous jamming they have undergone in passing from the greater to the lesser area of the barrel4 ,it is said that the paper of the cartridge fills up this enlargement2 but any one who knows what the force of gunpowder is1 must also know that paper intervening between the charge and the sides of the barrel would be condensed at the moment of explosion to one-fourth its original thickness4 ,,chapter ,,ix4 ,,the ,,rifle4 ,the ,rifle has at length taken its place among scientifically improved weapons4 ,mathematicians laboured long and earnestly to develope the important principles involved in it1 and which lay hidden like latent heat1 only waiting for the moment when they were to be extracted1 as they were at length by experiment1 the result of necessity3 indeed necessity has done more for the improvement of gunnery than all the mental toil and labour bestowed on the science itself4 ,the philosopher has sought in vain for that which mechanical skill unpatronised and unheeded forced upon the world1 and that1 too1 in spite of prejudice and contempt2 and the present generation see improvements brought out which were predicted generations before--as the following quotation from ,robins clearly shows3--8,whatever state shall thoroughly comprehend the nature and advantages of rifle pieces1 and having facilitated and completed their construction1 shall introduce into their armies their general use1 with a dexterity in the management of them1 they will by this means acquire a superiority which will almost equal anything that has been done at any time by the particular excellence of any one kind of arms1 and will perhaps fall but little short of the wonderful effects which histories relate to have been formerly produced by the first inventors of fire-arms40 ,that the result here predicted has now been obtained no one can doubt4 ,greater extension of range is yet attainable2 but accuracy of range amounts already to almost mathematical precision4 ,all that is now required is1 that the same principle should be applied to the heaviest projectiles2 and when these are projected under precisely the same laws1 experience will further establish this principle1 that 8the heavier the body in equal velocities the less the deflection from atmospheric resistance40 ,when this is demonstrated the present order of things will be reversed2 heavy ordnance will exceed the shoulder rifle in extension and accuracy of range1 whilst the shoulder rifle will again fall back to its former state of comparative inferiority4 ,barrels were first grooved or rifled at ,vienna1 about the year #adih4 ,the original object of grooving or rifling the barrels was to find space for the reception of the foul residue produced by discharging the rifle1 and thus to diminish the friction of the bullet as it was forced down by the ramrod4 ,during the next twenty years a spiral turn was given to the groove1 and bullets were used with projections to fit the grooves1 the degree of twist or spiral varying as the skill of the gun-maker thought best4 ,the difficulty of loading rifles has at all times been a drawback to their universal adoption as warlike weapons1 and it has been reserved for a humble individual to achieve that which all the talent devoted to it for three centuries had hitherto failed to accomplish4 ,a multitude of claimants have 8put in their plea0 for a share in some part of the invention2 and it may benefit not only the present but also the future generation1 if we give a succinct account of the approaches made by different men towards the present established principle1 and show the bearing each had in bringing about the revolution that has taken place in the science of gunnery4 ,the earliest notice of an elongated bullet is ,robins's 8egg-shaped10 which gives to the hemispherical end the centre of gravity1 thus establishing the first essential principle2 but theory and practice were here sadly discordant1 for its wild uncertain flight1 caused by the small end acting as a rudder1 rendered his theory useless1 and it soon died of a natural death4 ,the next innovation on the spherical principle of bullets was the attempt made by the late ,sir ,home ,popham to introduce elongated sphero-cylindrical bullets into cannon1 with grooves and projections on the exterior to impart a spinning motion1 which should be sustained by the action of the atmosphere2 but this1 like ,robins's idea1 survived only a very short time4 ,the next in rotation is a description given by ,captain ,beaufoy1 in his work on the rifle called ,scloppetaria1 and published1 we believe1 in #ahjh4 ,captain ,beaufoy gives a drawing of an elongated bullet one and a quarter diameters in length1 having a hemispherical cavity accurately corresponding in shape to its counterpart at the opposite end4 8,this10 he states1 8he had heard was beneficial from the fact of the rush of atmospheric air into the vacuum created1 thus inducing a forward motion by the kick posteriori40 ,this apparently was but a surmise1 an idea never carried out1 for in the same work a degree of spiral grooving is advocated with which the action of this bullet1 had it ever been intended to be expansive in principle1 would be quite incompatible4 ,next comes the celebrated ,joseph ,manton with his invention1 intended to give a spiral motion to the ball by the cup of wood already described under the head of rifled cannon4 ,this very idea has since been revived by ,general ,jacob2 and in #ahbb ,captain ,norton introduced to the notice of the ,government his 8,rifled ,shell0 for the explosion of an enemy's tumbrils4 ,this was of necessity an elongated hollow bullet1 containing a small charge of gunpowder1 which was ignited by the explosion of a cap on a nipple1 screwed into the fore-end of the leaden shell4 ,here1 no doubt1 was a partially expansive bullet2 for the bullet would be driven in upon itself1 and thus expand from the weakness of the hollow shell2 this near approach1 however1 to the invention was not intentional3 the sole object in view was the action of the shell1 and no more importance was attached to its expansion1 in ,captain ,norton's estimation1 than to the bullet described by ,captain ,beaufoy in his ,scloppetaria4 ,it is only within the last few years that some friend1 with more acumen than the gallant officer1 discovered his near approach to the subsequent invention1 and a claim has been made on his behalf which he himself never dreamt of1 during the many years we were battering at the doors of prejudice2 closed as they were against military innovation4 ,in #ahbf1 ,capt4 ,delvigne proposed to use an elongated bullet3 8having observed that when a bullet was forced in by the old system of the mallet1 its diameter was increased perpendicularly to the axis of the barrel1 he came to the conclusion that by giving a chamber to the breech of the rifle1 and loading with an elongated bullet having just sufficient windage to enter freely1 two or three taps from a steel ramrod would flatten it sufficiently to make it take the form of the grooves1 into which it would certainly penetrate when fired40 ,this contrivance was1 however1 found to be useless for military purposes2 for after a trial1 extending over two or three years1 by the ,garde ,royal in ,algeria1 it was given up in #ahcj4 ,this1 then1 is clear proof of an attempt to construct an expansive bullet1 and conclusive evidence also of its failure4 ,from #ahcj to #ahci1 no evidence can be found of any progress having been made by these inventors4 ,in #ahcf ,i had the honour of producing the first perfect expansive bullet4 ,during the winter of #ahce and the spring of #ahcf1 ,i made an extensive series of experiments in order to overcome the effect of the very extensive windage existing in military muskets at that time2 better known in the present day by the name of 8,old ,brown ,bess40 ,the mean diameter of the bore was #gfj1 the diameter of the bullet was #gja1 or of the better understood gauge of #aa and #ad bore1 thus leaving more than three sizes for windage4 ,to obviate this great discrepancy by expanding a bullet from #ad to #aa bore1 so as to destroy the windage1 was the first consideration2 and1 indeed1 the first great step towards that change of which we have as yet only seen the beginning4 ,i here give a representation of my first attempt1 and the observations made upon it in #ahda3-- ,five years ago ,i perfected and laid before the ,board of ,ordnance a new plan or system of constructing expansive balls1 which is accomplished by having two dissimilar portions4 ,an oval ball with a flat end and a perforation extending nearly through1 is cast2 a taper plug with a head like a round topped button is also cast1 of a composition of lead1 tin1 and zinc1 as below4 ,illustration3 ,,expansive ,,ball ,,before ,,using4 ,illustration3 ,,expansive ,,ball ,,with ,,plug ,,driven ,,home4 ,the end of the plug being slightly inserted into the perforation1 the ball is put into the rifle or musket with either end foremost4 ,when the explosion takes place1 the plug is driven home into the lead1 expanding the outer surface1 and thus either filling the grooves of the rifle1 or destroying the windage of the musket1 as the case may be4 ,the result of this experiment was beyond calculation2 and for musketry1 where the stupid regulations of the service require #c-a_/b sizes of bore difference for windage1 it is most excellent1 as remedying this considerable drawback upon the usefulness of the arm2 the facility of loading being as great1 if not greater1 than by the present practice4 ,inventions1 however1 are of no use whilst kept in obscurity1 and my first and natural course was to bring it under the notice of the parties for whose benefit it was intended4 ,accordingly1 in ,july1 #ahcf1 a memorial was duly drawn up1 and laid before the ,master-,general and ,board of ,ordnance1 soliciting a trial4 ,after overcoming some difficulties1 a trial was ordered at the 8cost of the inventor10 and in ,august1 #ahcf1 it took place at ,tynemouth1 in ,northumberland1 under the command of ,major ,walcot1 of the ,royal ,horse ,artillery1 a party of the #fjth ,rifles being the firing party4 ,the exact form of the memorial1 and the points claimed by the inventor1 are as follows3-- 8,to the ,right ,honourable the ,master-,general and ,officers of ,his ,majesty's ,board of ,ordnance4 ,the humble ,memorial of ,william ,greener1 ,gunmaker1 of ,newcastle-upon-,tyne1 humbly sheweth-- 8,that your memorialist has1 after considerable trouble and expense1 discovered a method by which the facility of loading all rifles1 muskets1 and other small fire-arms will be much increased1 as well as a considerable additional force or range of the projectile be obtained1 even with a less quantity of powder than at present used4 ,your memorialist has frequently loaded one of his ,majesty's rifles by this method1 as quickly as any soldier could load the plain musket1 and the balls when fired have received the same or greater effect from the action of the grooves of the rifle4 ,your memorialist's plan simply consists in the manufacture of a more ready kind of cartridge1 which will answer for all fire-arms as at present constructed1 and will also be a considerable saving to his ,majesty4 8,your memorialist being aware1 from former communications with your ,honourable ,board1 that in no case is any sum of money allowed for travelling expenses1 c41 and your memorialist being very far from rich1 is unable to attend any committee1 either at ,woolwich or elsewhere1 your memorialist1 therefore1 suggests that if it meet the approbation of your ,honourable ,board to issue an order to the officer commanding the depot of his ,majesty's #ast ,brigade #fjth ,rifles1 at present stationed in this town1 or to any other regiment or detachment in the neighbourhood1 to appoint a squad of men to fire #ajj rounds of memorialist's and #ajj rounds of the cartridges now in use1 and to compare their respective merits1 the whole to be provided at your memorialist's expense4 8,and memorialist1 as in duty bound1 will ever pray4 8,,william ,,greener40 ,the success of the experiments far surpassed the expectations of the military men present2 and that they fully established all the points claimed1 will be evident from the following secret report made by ,major ,walcott to the ,board of ,ordnance3-- 8,i then examined ,mr4 ,greener's ammunition1 and found he had not made it up into complete cartridges1 but that his ball was separate from his powder4 ,i then examined the ball1 which being less than the barrel of the rifle1 went down very easily--indeed slided down1 and is thus formed4 ,the ball is cast with a hollow in it1 to which a plug of the same metal is inserted1 but not going home4 ,the force of the charge is said by ,mr4 ,greener so to act on this hollow ball as to expand it1 filling up the whole barrel1 preventing all windage1 and so truly keeping its flight that the head of the plug first striking the object fired at1 is then driven home2 the ball becomes a solid1 and as such is equal to the present mode1 as well as having more force and with a less quantity of powder than at present used4 8,a detachment of the #fjth was then ordered to load with ,mr4 ,greener's1 and an equal number with his ,majesty's practice ammunition4 ,the first certainly had the advantage in quickness of loading1 but this may be accounted for by ,mr4 ,greener's ball being put in separate from the cartridge2 for ,i am by no means certain 7it being necessary that his plug should be exactly in the centre1 either next the cartridge or from it7 whether1 when made into a complete form1 should the plug have shifted from its position1 it would not cost the soldier more time to place it right2 neither am ,i certain whether the plug might not be liable to become jammed in the soldier's cartouch-box4 8,after firing several rounds1 at #bjj yards1 at the target1 we succeeded in obtaining some of ,mr4 ,greener's balls1 one of which that had struck the target and did not go through ,i send 7marked7 as the most favourable specimen of the day's practice1 the plug being driven hard into the ball1 the others having lost their plugs4 ,mr4 ,greener1 whose wishes ,i complied with in every way ,i could1 then proposed firing a number of rounds into a sandbank1 to show that the plugs did not quit the ball4 ,a great many rounds were fired2 in many the plugs were out1 in many loosely fixed and easily removed1 and in a part firm4 ,not having the advantage of the target ,i had desired him to bring1 a number of rounds were fired at the rifle's extreme range1 #cej yards1 as the best means left of ascertaining the difference of range2 the only result of which was1 that it appeared invariably to me and others on the slightest resistance from the first the plug quitted the ball1 and therefore must have lessened its force from loss of weight4 ,the balls from both charges1 ,mr4 ,greener's and his ,majesty's1 went home to the target1 but only one of the latter went through4 ,i had then fired most of ,mr4 ,greener's cartridges and balls1 and fifty rounds of the practice ammunition of the #fjth4 ,i beg to submit with the greatest deference that in so great a change as this proposed1 even should it be considered worthy any other trial1 that the specimens ,i shall send up by the earliest opportunity may have competent examination--for1 although the balls of ,mr4 ,greener bear the impress of the grooves of the rifle1 ,i am not able to state whether such may not equally well be produced by the action of being forced from the rifle as by the expansion ,mr4 ,greener states to take place--should the ,master-,general deem it necessary that any further experiment be made by me and with cartridges properly made up40 ,the immediate result was a very pithy epistle from the ,secretary to the ,board1 saying1 that 8in consequence of the bullet ,i had submitted being #8a compound1' it was totally unfit for his ,majesty's service1 and no more trials could be allowed40 ,this1 in #ahcf1 was the universal mode of proceeding1 as subsequent events clearly proved2 whether from inability on the part of the constituted military science controllers1 or from a fixed determination to reject all improvements from civilians1 ,i knew not2 but time explained it all1 as the sequel will show4 ,the total destruction1 in #ahda1 of the small arms department in the ,tower of ,london1 together with all the arms it contained1 opened a vista to improvement both in the principle and mechanical construction of 8,old ,brown ,bess40 ,this opportunity was not lost4 ,a series of letters1 ,nos4 #a to #f1 appeared in the ,times in ,november and ,december1 #ahda1 urging the necessity of a radical change in the construction of military arms1 if the nation was still to hold its high military prestige4 ,the sensation created at this time was immense1 and no doubt laid the foundation stone for that change which has rendered ,english arms superior to any in the world1 instead of being1 as they formerly were1 inferior to any in ,europe4 ,in one of those letters1 which may still be found in the ,times of ,december #beth1 #ahda1 the following account is given of the progress ,i had made in the invention since #ahcf2 and when the form and proportions of my expansive bullet of #ahda are contrasted with the present and the original form adopted by our ,government from the ,french of ,captain ,mini in #ahdi1 it must strike the reader as being so palpable a copy as to leave no ground for argument4 8,one favourite suggestion of ,hutton's has hitherto been strenuously rejected1 even by those to whom his recommendations have1 in other respects1 been laws--viz41 his plan of using #8oblong bullets4' ,some years ago ,i laid before the ,board of ,ordnance a very simple plan of getting rid of all windage1 yet of loading easily1 and adding to the weight of the projectile 7a favourite theory with the artillerists74 ,this was effected by employing an oblong ball of lead #8a diameter and a half in length1' having a perforation extending through two-thirds of it4 ,an iron plug of a conical shape is slightly inserted into this perforation1 and the gun loaded with it4 ,when the explosion takes place1 this plug is driven home into the lead1 and1 by expanding its outer surface1 the projectile comes out of the gun fitting as tight as possible1 and a line of flight is given to it of corresponding accuracy4 ,the advantages of this arrangement are numerous1 but1 in naval warfare1 of the most important nature1 giving heavier metal with smaller rates1 and from the composition and shape of the projectile combined1 producing a corresponding destruction4 8,but the authorities laid the plan upon the shelf1 where it will rest until produced by some more important personage than myself4 ,the poor inventor obtains but poor encouragement1 while his more wealthy competitor is enabled to have every opportunity of trying schemes which1 in most cases1 are not worth the consideration of any1 save the friends of the party40 ,in #ahdb1 powerful influence being brought to bear1 it was hoped that a trial of my invention would result2 and in order to meet the strongly expressed public opinion1 the ,board of ,ordnance ordered me to construct them model arms on my own principle4 ,this was done1 and the trial promised by the ,master-,general was demanded1 but as obstinately refused by the ,select ,committee at ,woolwich1 whose power was superior to that of the ,master-,general2 though he was fully pledged to afford me a trial4 ,thus the progress of invention was delayed until #ahdh2 sometimes enlivened1 however1 by the bursting of a shell of intelligence in the camp of military prejudice4 ,slashing letters appeared from time to time on military incapacity4 ,meanwhile ,captain ,delvigne and ,captain ,thierry continued their experiments1 and on ,june #bast1 #ahdb1 a patent was obtained in ,france1 which is thus described3-- 8,for having hollowed the base of my cylindro-conical bullet1 not only for motives mentioned in the descriptive memoir given with my demand for a patent1 but besides to obtain its expansion 7son panouissement7 by the effect of the gases produced through the ignition of the powder4 ,by this means the effort of the powder itself1 which formerly caused spherical bullets to deviate from the grooves1 now contributes to force the bullets of my system more firmly into them40 ,in a paper published by ,m4 ,delvigne in the ,spectateur ,militaire1 of ,august1 #ahdc1 we also find3-- 8,in order to avoid too great friction ,i grooved the cylindrical surface of the bullet2 but1 whilst ,i thus increased the windage of the body of the projectile1 ,i reserved1 at the two extremities of the cylindrical part1 two circular rings of a diameter almost equal to that of the calibre4 ,these two rings fixed accurately in the bore1 secured the perfect position of the axis of the bullet1 which the blow of the ramrod then forced tightly4 ,in case of foulness1 they easily gave way to the blows of the ramrod1 and the axis of the bullet remained in the required position4 ,the hollowing of the sides of the bullet gives besides the means of fixing on the cartridge without increasing the diameter of the calibre4 ,but during these investigations1 ,i made an important discovery1 which was1 that the gas produced by the ignition of the powder1 rushing into the vacuum formed at the base of the bullet1 expanded it and forced it into the grooves4 ,i here give the idea1 a new one1 as ,i think1 and recommend its application to such as occupy themselves with the effect of fire-arms and powder4 ,the following1 however1 must be avoided3 if the hollow is too deep1 the expansion is too great1 and the consequent friction enormous2 sometimes even the gas will traverse the bullet1 and consequently the projectile is deprived of a proportionary amount of velocity2 if too small1 the expansion does not take place40 ,in #ahdg and #ahdh ,captain ,mini makes his first appearance on the boards2 and he proposed a hollow iron cup to fill up the cavity in ,delvigne's bullet1 and from this circumstance we get the name of ,mini rifle4 ,the serious defects in our arms were now1 however1 becoming so glaring1 and the disgrace of getting worsted in skirmishes with contemptible foes in the ,cabul and ,caffre wars1 as well as nearer home in the ,mediterranean1 raised public indignation against the military arms department2 and this indignation reached such a pitch that an immediate change was called for4 ,the so-called invention of ,captain ,mini offered itself1 and was immediately adopted1 though the very same thing had previously1 on two occasions1 been rejected at my hands4 ,thus the history of the rifle is brought up to the adoption by the ,government of my principle1 under the name of the ,mini rifle2 and the validity of the pleas on the part of the several claimants for a share in the invention has been succinctly stated4 ,during the succeeding years ,i several times made unsuccessful attempts to obtain from the ,english ,government a recognition of my claim to the invention4 ,true it is that insult was not added to injury1 for they did not tell me ,i had no claim as an inventor1 but they sheltered themselves under the political plea of 8,oh1 my dear sir1 the injustice did not occur under our ,administration1 or we should be so happy to remedy it60 ,time went on1 and war came at length1 and brought with it proof that but for my invention we should have been ill prepared4 8,the queen of weapons saved the fight30 so said the ,thunderer4 8,when war's wild din was done10 the poor inventor was listened to4 ,the first step taken was through ,mr4 ,scholefield1 the member for ,birmingham1 who moved in the ,house of ,commons for copies of the correspondence between myself and the ,board of ,ordnance in #ahcf1 and the papers therewith connected4 ,thus an act of glaring injustice was exposed1 and there was evidence of proceedings having been enacted over which ,i would rather draw a veil4 ,the authorities were no doubt shocked at the injustice which the poor inventor had met with at the hands of the then ,board of ,ordnance4 ,thus ,i obtained the ,secret ,report1 which elevates so high the names of those who could designate a plan as 8useless and chimerical10#ac which was destined eventually to create greater changes in gunnery than it had undergone from its earliest invention4 #ac ,,the ,,secret ,,report ,,of ,,the ,,select ,,committee4 ,,present3--,major-,general ,millar2 ,colonel ,adye1 ,c4,b42 ,colonel ,tyer1 ,c4,b42 ,colonel ,drummond1 ,c4,b42 ,sir ,alex4 ,dickson1 ,k4,c4,b42 ,major ,dundas4 8,woolwich1 #bith ,august1 #ahcf4 8,,sir1-- 8,i have the honour to report that1 in obedience to your minute1 dated the #bbnd inst41 ,i assembled the ,select ,committee for the purpose of considering a new invented cartridge for rifles1 made by ,mr4 ,william ,greener1 gunmaker1 of ,newcastle4 ,patterns of these cartridges1 with a report from ,major ,walcott1 ,royal ,horse ,artillery1 of a day's practice with them at ,tynemouth4 ,several balls that have been discharged at and collected after that practice were submitted to the ,committee1 who1 after an attentive consideration1 is of opinion that the ends purposed by ,mr4 ,greener have not been accomplished2 that his plan is useless and chimerical4 ,the ,committee do not1 therefore1 recommend any further trial in the terms solicited by ,mr4 ,greener in his memorial of the #fth inst4 8,i have1 c41 8,,william ,,millar1 ,dep4-,adjut4-,gen40 ,i then disputed the fact of its being a ,french invention before the juries of the ,french ,exposition in #ahee2 there1 however1 my evidence was inadmissible1 from the fact of it not having been exhibited1 and the invention not being a recent one4 ,in spite of all this1 ,i still persevered2 and my next step was to submit the subject to royalty4 ,i first submitted it to the ,emperor ,napoleon1 who carefully investigated the facts of the case1 and admitted the ,englishman's priority4 ,eventually the ,british ,government1 after much trouble1 also admitted the fact1 7though not until after it had been submitted to the successors of the original select committee7 and awarded me the sum of #a1jjjl4 in the army estimates of #aheg4 ,it is a fact1 which all will acknowledge1 that the principles involved in an invention should be best known to the inventor himself2 and if he is unable to explain the very principles of such invention1 then it is quite fair to presume that he was not the original inventor4 ,now there is no evidence that either ,delvigne or ,mini had any profound knowledge of the science of gunnery1 and their knowledge of the principles of the expansive rifle was so meagre as to justify the assumption1 that their only connection with its production was that of copying from the ,times newspaper1 or from my works published in #ahdb and #ahdf4 ,my observations certainly appeared before any of theirs2 and ,i believe that no straining of facts can in any way connect them with the invention1 which was as perfect in #ahda as when they reproduced it in #ahdh and #ahdi4 ,with these remarks1 ,i pass on to what is of more importance1 viz41 the principle of the expansive rifle4 ,it had long been known that to give a spiral motion to a bullet in a direction coincident to its line of flight1 was the standard of perfection in rifle projectiles2 but this1 until the invention of the expansive bullet1 could never be attained with safety4 ,spheres receiving this motion are not likely to retain it1 because the periphery of the spherical bullet is1 in all cases1 subjected to much more friction than the rest of the sphere2 a change would therefore certainly be induced1 the axis of the spinning motion being changed from one coincident to the line of flight to that of one vertical to the same4 ,the two grooved rifle was an illustration of this2 for in all cases the projections on the bullet induced a change1 the ring of the bullet revolving parallel to the horizontal line1 as ,i predicted in #ahda4 ,enough has been said to point out the prejudicial action of any projections on projectiles1 both as regards their accuracy and length of flight2 perfect smoothness of surface being1 in fact1 absolutely necessary4 ,lengthened study and a series of experiments with bullets of a sphero-cylindrical shape having grooves and projections on their exterior identical with the grooving of the interior of the barrel1 led me to consider the production of a bullet with a considerable cavity 7equal1 in fact1 to two-thirds of its length7 at the same time adopting as a standard one and a half diameters in the length of the bore of the gun2 thus the thickness of the metal between the apex of the bullet and apex of the cavity was nearly one half of the diameter1 as the following diagram will show4 ,illustration ,this enabled me to insure two important principles1 on which depended the success of the whole invention4 #ast4 ,the centre of gravity was in the head of the projectile4 #bnd4 8,the force was communicated directly to the centre of gravity during the explosion40 ,this is a most important principle1 which all writers presuming to give their version to the theory of the expansive system1 have entirely overlooked4 ,if the arrow could receive the propelling force in the head1 its motion would be even1 and free from 8hobbling10 as ,roger ,ascham wishes it to be2 but if1 on the contrary1 it is received at the opposite extremity1 then there is a struggle between the head and the tail1 as to which shall be first1 and a 8wobbling0 motion is induced1 enduring until an equilibrium of velocity is established4 ,it is essential to all future progress in the science of projectiles1 that this point should be remembered1 and its importance duly estimated2 and it is possible to apply this principle to projectiles of any weight4 ,if this point be attended to1 where is the difficulty in extending the length of our projectiles to that of arrows8 thus increasing their range indefinitely4 ,there is1 in fact1 no law to limit the length of expansive bullets3 the only limit to their length now is the tendency of lead to squash2 but alloys of lead and other metals may yet be beneficially used for projectiles1 and that to an extent of which at present we can form no conception4 ,the range of vision of the human eye being inferior to the range of the rifle will probably be the only limit to its use2 and this range will not be difficult to attain3 reduction in the size of bore enables us to elongate the bullet without diminishing its weight or the accuracy of its range2 but without the existence of a cavity to insure the force being applied to the head of the bullet1 this cannot possibly be done2 whilst all other shapes are limited in their application1 and an extension of range cannot be obtained with them4 ,next to these two important points in the invention comes the question of expansion1 whereby the grooves of the rifle are filled up with lead1 and windage is as far as possible obviated4 ,the expander ,i first employed consisted of a tapering piece of iron1 similar in shape to the frustum of a cone1 and this1 when inserted into the cavity of the bullet1 was flush with the bottom of the cylinder4 ,the force generated by the ignition of the charge was exerted equally on the plug and on the leaden cylinder2 the plug1 however1 moving more rapidly than the lead1 is driven quicker into the bullet1 the bullet expands1 and thus the filling up of the grooves is accomplished4 ,there can be no doubt that at the same time an upward force is exerted by the plug on the leaden bullet2 and that1 too1 of a more elastic character than would be exerted by the gases themselves1 if they were allowed to act directly with all their force upon the lead2 for it is a fact beyond all dispute1 that any force tending to set matter in motion gradually is more effective than that which is instantaneous in its action4 ,many writers condemn in toto the ,mini principle and its cup4 ,mini did not understand it2 and the introduction of the cup by him was1 ,i believe1 an accident1 or the best he could do by copying my mode of using it3 it was not the production of his own brain4 ,it has been urged as an argument against the use of this cup1 that sometimes expansion does not occur4 ,this1 however1 may easily be accounted for by the fact that the cup is not tightly fitted into the cavity of the bullet2 a space is left through which the elastic fluid penetrates the cavity1 the cup then has as much pressure exerted upon it behind as in front1 and hence it remains undisturbed4 ,then the cup is sometimes driven in so violently that it becomes flattened against the flat surface of the upper portion of the cavity1 cutting the lead so entirely as to leave the cylindrical portion of the bullet in the breech of the gun2 this is well known to have been a frequent occurrence on the first introduction of this bullet4 ,these defects are instanced1 as evidence to show that ,mini and others have no claim whatever to the production of the original idea--they cannot even now grasp it1 but condemn it1 because it is beyond the limits of their comprehension4 ,true it is that1 after blundering for several years1 our ,government have come back to my original idea1 as the following quotation will show3-- 8,colonel ,hay10 says ,sir ,howard ,douglas1 8has introduced an important improvement in the shape of the cup1 and in the figure of the cavity into which it is forced on the firing of the charge4 ,it will be perceived that the cavity in the ,mini shot has the form of the frustum of a cone1 while that of the cup is a hemisphere3 now all who have examined the shot picked up after having struck an iron target or penetrated into the earth1 find that the hemispherical cup is very liable to be canted or turned instead of being forced directly into the hollow space2 the lead of the shot is not driven equally into the grooves of the rifle4 ,for this evil ,colonel ,hay has proposed a remedy1 in giving both to the cup and the cavity in the shot conoidal forms2 by which means the former must1 by the force of the powder1 proceed directly forward in the hollow space1 and thus uniformly expand the lower part of the shot in the bore40 ,if this is not conclusive evidence of the priority of my invention1 then ,i cannot understand the ,english language4 ,the next object ,i sought to obtain in the invention was a reduction of opposing surface1 and an increased momentum4 ,the law of atmospheric resistance is as the area of displacement1 and the velocity with which that displacement is effected4 ,thus1 a spherical bullet of one ounce weight displaces a bulk of the atmosphere equal to the area of its hemisphere2 whereas an elongated bullet of the same weight would have to displace so much less as is the difference between their diameters4 ,these two bullets1 started at equal velocities1 are acted upon very differently by opposing forces2 the velocity of the spherical is diminished much sooner than that of the elongated bullet1 on account of its greater diameter3 hence the increased range of the elongated bullet4 ,let us suppose an extreme case4 ,take a bullet produced from a description of hardened lead five diameters in length1 and presenting to the atmosphere one-fifth the surface of a spherical bullet of equal weight2 the reasonable assumption would be that this bullet would range a greater distance if projected at the same velocity1 and if the same charge of gunpowder be used as with a spherical bullet4 ,the first series of experiments clearly established the fact that increased range could be obtained1 and also with a vast reduction in the charge of gunpowder3 with a saving1 in fact1 of nearly #ej per cent4 ,two drachms and a half were found equal to a range of fourteen hundred yards1 whilst four drachms and a half on the old system would rarely reach half that distance4 ,these important points were gradually developed1 though not without many disappointments and much mental anxiety3 the last discovery1 to have rendered the task easy1 should have been the first4 ,extreme spiral curve in the rifle barrel is incompatible with the correct action of the expansive bullet4 ,the old-established turns of one in four feet1 one in three feet1 and one in two feet nine inches1 gave results in the order ,i have placed them2 and it was not until the adoption of a spiral approximating to one turn in five and a half up to six feet1 that ,i found the success of my experiments uniform3 and this fact illustrates one great obstacle which my invention had to contend with before it was generally adopted4 ,the ordinary sporting rifles have invariably too much spiral2 the amount of friction generated by an expansive bullet in a rifle of this construction is enormous1 absorbing in many cases one half the power of the expellant4 ,the result of this is most unsatisfactory3 the bullet suddenly loosed from this immense friction1 and freed from the column of air in the tube1 rushes so wildly forward as entirely to destroy equilibrium in its flight2 and hence the very loud complaints of disappointed experimenters4 ,the expansive principle now adopted combines such qualities that1 however long and loudly it may be condemned1 it will again assert its superiority1 and hold undisputed the first place for generations to come4 ,it is based on that law of nature which will always tell in mechanical productions2 namely1 minimum of friction1 and hence maximum of propulsion or velocity2 the greatest possible range with the least amount of expellant agency4 ,the same law holds1 even though the bullet should be elongated and made into an arrow4 ,that which has been introduced to the world as an improvement on my invention1 and modestly termed the 8,pritchett bullet10 ,i rejected in #ahda as being inferior to the expansive bullet3 any one who is curious1 and wishes to be convinced of this fact1 will find the following quotation in the ,naval and ,military ,gazette for ,february1 #ahdb3--8;,a great improvement may be effected by using plugs of a cylindrical shape1 having the upper end round1 and the part next the powder flat or concave2 for rifles1 to be of use1 must be constructed for high velocity1 and this can be done by a proportionate spiral and the use of a plug similar to that given above4 ,in this case we may load with the greatest facility1 and the bullet expanding1 forces itself into the grooves of the rifle1 and thus receives the modicum of spiral motion required40 ,a perusal of 8,captain ,jervis on the ,musket ,rifle0 would lead one to infer that this was a great invention on the part of ,mr4 ,pritchett1 and that it would supersede to a certainty the more perfect expansive bullet2 but ,mr4 ,pritchett's so-called invention has sunk into oblivion1 from whence it will never emerge4 ,from practice ,i found that the most material defect in this bullet was its uncertainty of action3 it was driven in upon itself1 and thus its diameter was increased4 ,a slight difference in the hardness of the lead1 a bullet moulded when the metal was hot1 and the reverse1 would be such insuperable difficulties as to render their adoption quite impracticable2 moreover1 when rapid firing became necessary1 the enormous friction created by the heat and hardness of the previous deposit from exploded powder1 rendered the use of these bullets highly dangerous2 as was proved in the ,crimean war4 ,i trust they are now for ever abandoned1 for their adoption did not show great intelligence on the part of their advocates4 ,the expansive principle not being adopted in the armies of ,france and other ,continental nations1 may be justly attributed to the experimenters of the ,french school having been led astray2 claiming1 as they did1 the entire merit of the invention4 ,it is but fair that whilst endeavouring to establish my own claim to the invention1 ,i should point out the discrepancies existing in the theory of my opponents4 ,that considerable imperfections exist in the expansive rifle used in ,france1 is evident from the results of their experiments1 and the time which has been wasted in discussing the principles necessary for correcting the flight of the bullet by 8annular rings0 being applied to its cylindrical part4 ,captain ,tamissier's theory is 8that an elongated bullet in passing through the air1 describing the curve of the trajectory1 maintained its axis parallel in its successive positions to the position it had at starting1 and that the angle formed by this axis with the element of the trajectory--that is1 the direction of the motion--changed every instant4 ,the action of atmospheric resistance would also be altered by the surface presented by the projectile2 as the point of application of this force would not always pass through the centre of gravity1 but would establish a rotatory motion different from that with which the bullet was originally animated3 in different words1 the bullet1 by preserving its original position1 would after a time be pursuing its path with its broadside foremost2 that is1 with the point of its axis above the line of the trajectory and the near end below4 8,to remedy this1 and increase the precision of fire with these bullets1 ,captain ,tamissier thought it was necessary to create resistances to the atmosphere as far as possible behind their centre of gravity1 in order to bring the point of the bullet back to its original course4 ,for this purpose he formed a number of circular grooves on the cylindrical part of the bullet1 in imitation of the feathers of an arrow2 which1 he says1 are placed at the hinder part to engender resistances40 ,the folly of such a theory must be very apparent to a practical man4 ,the engraving below of a bullet obtained direct from ,captain ,mini in ,december1 #ahee1 and with which the troops were then experimenting at ,vincennes1 when compared with my bullet of #ahdc1 renders any further argument unnecessary4 ,illustration3 ,,minie ,,bullet1 #ahee4 ,illustration3 ,,greenerian ,,bullet1 #ahdc4 ,with this ,i contrast my bullet of #ahda1 at page #ced1 and a very slight inspection will be sufficient to satisfy any one of its superiority3 every practical rifle-shooter knows that the smoother all the surfaces of the bullet1 the more extensive and accurate is the range4 ,that the ,french experiments should have given unsatisfactory results ,i am not at all surprised3 the flat surface on the point of the bullet must offer a large space for the resistance of the atmosphere1 during #a1jjj yards of flight4 ,then to this must be added the effect produced by the rings around the bullet2 and when the resistance of the atmosphere and that produced by the friction of the bullet are added together1 we need not be surprised that the results of the experiments turned out very unsatisfactory4 ,surely1 if the ,french school invented the bullet which produced this wonderful revolution in gunnery1 they would have rendered it perfect1 instead of producing it in a more rude state in #ahdh than ,i had produced it in #ahdj4 ,another point affording strong evidence that the whole was copied from my work of #ahdb1 is this4 ,in my original plan the bottom of the cavity of the bullet was flat1 exactly as it now appears in ,captain ,mini's annular ringed bullet4 ,in #ahdc this was changed into a hemispherical bottom2 and this exists in all ,english expansive bullets1 as the adjoining woodcut will show4 ,in #aheb ,i produced a new form of cup1 intended to obviate the use of the heavier substance1 or conical piece of iron4 ,in addition to a cup of a parabolic spindle shape1 it had a rim like that on a man's hat1 as the woodcut will show4 ,illustration ,a great advantage is gained by this contrivance in effectually expanding the bullet1 and thus closing up stray appendages1 which are found to exert considerable influence on the ultimate direction of the bullet4 ,a slight tail of cartridge-paper1 a string1 or an appendage of any description1 exerts such an important influence on the bullet's flight1 as to cause it in some instances to describe a curve1 the termination of which is very eccentric1 and commences from the very base of its starting4 ,it is evident1 then1 that great accuracy is necessary in order to produce a perfect expansive bullet4 ,english bullets are pressed into shape by machinery1 whilst in ,france they are formed in the ordinary mould2 this1 however1 is at all times an uncertain mode of making them3 a slight cavity in the head of the bullet would make it eccentric in its flight2 and this is very difficult to avoid3 a slight puncture1 or an eruption on the surface1 would1 during a lengthened flight1 be materially acted upon by the atmosphere1 so as to influence in a great degree the direction of its flight4 ,the scientific world is deeply indebted to ,general ,jacob1 of the ,scinde ,horse1 for the zeal and energy he has displayed in carrying out his principle of projectiles4 ,he experimented on a scale never before attempted by any private individual2 his explosive projectiles have created universal interest1 and the great ranges he obtained will hand down the ,general's name in the history of gunnery to all future generations4 ,whilst ascribing all credit to ,general ,jacob for the benefit he has bestowed on projectile science1 it is not less my duty to point out how unfortunate for science1 and for the ,general's scientific reputation1 were the defects which exist in the system of which he is so strenuous an advocate4 ,general ,jacob's principle differs from mine as widely as the poles are separated from each other4 ,in mine there exists the least amount of friction1 the minimum of spiral motion1 and a most extensive range1 with the smallest expenditure of expellant force4 ,in the ,general's invention these points are exactly reversed3 friction is at the highest point1 the degree of spiral in the groove is more than double1 and the charge1 as a matter of course1 is much greater4 ,the range is greater1 no doubt2 as it ought to be1 being obtained at treble cost4 ,cost1 in all cases1 is the key to success or failure2 not cost in a monetary sense only1 but cost of wear and tear4 ,destruction of the barrel1 and the amount of buffeting by recoil1 are points of cost2 and the principle of ,general ,jacob is so nearly allied to that of the 8hexagonal0 rifle1 that many will think1 and perhaps not without good reason1 that the one has given rise to the production of the other4 ,the great length of column1 #b-a_/b diameters in height1 is so extreme1 as to be evidence in itself of the very unsound principles on which this rifle is constructed4 ,when bullets composed entirely of lead are used1 the result is that the bullet is so driven in upon itself1 as to upset the whole structure1 8swaging0 it whilst in the barrel into a long cylindrical tube of lead1 as the wood-cut1 exhibiting the bullet before and after firing1 will sufficiently explain2 whilst the friction and lateral pressure on the tube of the barrel1 which must be necessary to effect the change in the bullet1 require no further comment4 ,illustration3 ,,point ,,of ,,bullet ,,before ,,firing4 ,illustration3 ,,whole ,,bullet ,,after ,,firing4 ,the experience gained by ,general ,jacob induced him subsequently to adopt an iron or zinc-pointed bullet1 as is depicted in the wood engraving4 ,illustration3 ,,complete ,,bullet4 ,illustration3 ,,metal ,,point4 ,thus departing from the true science of the question1 instead of giving the centre of gravity to the head of the bullet1 he tries to overcome the difficulties by which his system is beset1 by increasing the spiral motion4 ,as other writers take a similar view of the question1 ,i insert the following quotation from a small work by ,lieutenant ,simons1 ,bengal ,artillery1 entitled 8,a ,treatise on ,fire-arms10 where we have the following appropriate remarks1 strongly bearing on the peculiarities of this system3-- 8,every point upon the surface of a projectile in motion1 whether it be a rocket1 javelin1 ship1 bullet1 arrow1 or any other description of projectile1 is the end of a lever1 the fulcrum of which is situated in the projectile's centre of gravity4 ,the effect of the air to upset1 i4 e41 to force the light or pointed end of such projectile to the rear1 or to unsteady1 or cause to waver1 the same1 depends upon the lengths of the levers at the ends of which it acts1 and upon the angles at which it presses against such levers1 as determined by the positions of the points and by the shape of the projectile2 it likewise depends upon the specific intensity of the pressure1 which is doubtless greatest in the neighbourhood of those parts of the projectile which least easily allow the air to escape past them4 8,an illustration in part of the truth of the foregoing proposition will present itself to the conceptions of those who have taken notice of the manner of the flight of rockets1 or who have witnessed shells projected from mortars at night time4 ,the light of the burning fuse1 particularly during the first part of the flight of the shell1 is seldom obscured from the sight of the beholders in the battery from which it is fired4 ,the end of the fuse protruding beyond the general surface of the shell is the end of a lever whose fulcrum is the shell's centre of gravity4 ,the pressure of the air against this lever as the shell moves forward1 drives it to the rear1 in which place it would remain steady1 did the shell in its course describe a straight line2 a curve1 however1 being the line actually described1 it follows that the direction from which the resistance created by the shell's own motion comes1 is ever varying2 whereby the occurrence of an equilibrium is prevented1 and the shell is caused to oscillate laterally as it were4 ,if the size of the fuze end of it1 however1 be at all considerable1 the shell will rarely topple over1 and1 in consequence1 the light of the fuze1 during the ascending curve1 will generally be visible4 8,the more rapidly a ball is made to reach its goal1 the nearer will the line described by it approach to a straight one1 and the less will it roll4 ,it is possible that the old musket-ball did not roll much during the first fifty or hundred yards of its flight1 and that the accuracy of shooting with it will have been less on this account4 ,a ball which does not roll1 may be said to be #8in position2' there is inherent in it a fixed tendency to deviate from the line in which it is projected4 ,now a shell which rolls much by reason of its comparatively slow motion1 is ever tending to stray in different directions1 and1 therefore1 a movement in the wrong direction1 at one moment1 being compensated for the next by a corresponding movement in the opposite direction1 it may be by this means a recipient of an amount of accidental compensation to which1 perhaps1 the musket-ball is a stranger4 8,such being the manifest effect of projections upon the surface of a shell1 it is not difficult to imagine what must be the unseen effect of projections on the surface of a rifle ball4 ,one projection1 placed without regard to effect upon such surface1 would make the ball jog and oscillate much after the manner that has been described4 ,two or more of proper form and construction will1 on the contrary1 if properly placed upon a projectile1 hold it steady1 and so impart to it a fixed tendency to digress1 thereby preparing it to be usefully operated upon by spiral motion4 8,so much as has been said will1 ,i think1 suffice to disprove that not unfrequently entertained notion to the effect that the light end of a bullet is kept forward by the operation of the spiral motion imparted to it4 ,i could cite more than one person and pamphlet 7,general ,jacob71 apparently under the influence of this belief1 but which certainly does not accord with theory1 and the practical incorrectness of which was thus manifested to me40 ,the ,whitworth rifle1 which was introduced to the world with a clarion flourish from the ,times1 has not made any very rapid progress toward perfection4 ,it still drags out an existence1 it is true1 but its boasted superiority is all a myth2 as time and experience will show4 ,like the former1 but more meritorious1 invention of ,general ,jacob1 it is based on an unsound principle1 an untenable theory1 good only in seeming1 which collapses when grasped by the hand of practical experience4 ,the peculiarity connected with this weapon is the extraordinary circumstances under which it first saw the light3--,it was produced by the aid of ,plutus1 dragging in reputed science to fashion on the instant a weapon superior to the tardy results of three centuries2 though during that period numbers of talented individuals had devoted their lives to the study of gunnery4 ,wealth is generally believed to be able to remove all obstructions1 and even to purchase capacity1 if need be2 though it can scarcely enable one individual to surpass the experience of ages1 however talented that individual may be4 ,the attempt thus to obtain such assistance was a slight by the ,government of the day to the improvers of ,british fire-arms2 they were passed over as of no value1 and the country's wealth was thrown into the lap of a talented1 but at the same time1 not a practical man4 ,the ,government of this country had on all previous occasions exacted from inventors their brains and their money1 as an offering in exchange for patronage2 on this occasion1 however1 they departed widely from their usual custom1 for the 8mountain came to the mouse40 ,it would have been a grateful compliment if the ,government had said to the inventor1 8,you have done something for the good of your country with your limited means1 here are thousands of pounds at your command2 do something better1 for we need it40 ,but nothing of the kind was done3 a selection was made1 justified by no antecedent qualifications4 ,the first thing necessary was the acquirement in a very short time of a practical knowledge of gunnery1 in order that a weapon should be produced superior to any other2 but whether success has attended these efforts or not is still doubtful1 and this is in itself a fit rebuff to the ,minister1 who expected1 like the citizen's wife1 that 8gold would purchase capacity40 ,the great defect in the hexagonal-bored rifle is the extreme amount of friction1 and the consequent useless expenditure of means4 ,the bullet is produced in the most accurate manner in a lathe1 and is composed of an alloy of lead1 tin1 and manganese1 so as to render it hard enough to resist the tendency to squash or swage2 which is the case in ,general ,jacob's principle4 ,the angles on the bullet are cut with the greatest precision1 in order to fit the groove of the barrel2 constituting1 in fact1 a female screw of two turns in every thirty-nine inches of length4 ,as fair play has always been my motto1 ,i am actuated by no other desire than that of enabling the reader to form a true conception of the intricate nature of projectile science2 and though the eulogium bestowed on the inventor's own creation is rather egotistical1 ,i give it entire1 dissecting it afterwards in the manner ,i think most conducive to a correct knowledge of the real science of gunnery4 8,,the ,,whitworth ,,and ,,enfield ,,rifles4 8,for the last few days a very interesting and important series of experiments has been in progress at the ,government ,school of ,musketry1 ,hythe1 in order to test the comparative merits of these two rifles4 ,the trial1 which was of the most searching and impartial character1 was conducted by ,colonel ,hay1 the able head of the school1 and has terminated in establishing beyond all doubt the great and decided superiority of ,mr4 ,whitworth's invention4 ,the ,enfield rifle1 which was considered so much better than any other as to justify the formation of a vast ,government establishment for its special manufacture1 has been completely beaten4 ,in accuracy of fire1 in penetration1 and in range1 its rival excels it to a degree which hardly leaves room for comparison4 8,the following table gives the best results that have been obtained from #aj shots of each arm respectively1 in the course of the experiments1 which have extended over a week in time1 and were brought to a close yesterday in the presence of ,lord ,panmure and of a number of military and scientific spectators3-- ---------------------------------------- - ,range in ,elevation4,figure of ,,rifle4 yards4 ,merit4 ---------------------------------------- - ,deg4 ,feet4 ,whitworth #aae #jcg ,enfield #ejj #acb #bbd ,whitworth #bbj #ajj ,enfield #hjj #bde #daa ,whitworth #cde #bda ,enfield #a1ajj #dab #hjd ,whitworth #ejj #dfb ,enfield #a1djj #fbj to #g4 ,no hits ,whitworth #fdj #aafb ,enfield #a1hjj -- -- ---------------------------------------- - ,it would appear from these figures that at #ejj yards in #aj shots the ,manchester rifle has a superior accuracy of #ahg of a foot2 at #hjj yards #caa2 at #a1ajj yards #efc2 and that at #a1djj yards and upwards the ,enfield weapon ceases to afford any data for a comparison4 ,in penetration the results obtained have been equally decisive2 the ,whitworth projectile1 with the regulation charge of powder1 going through #cc half-inch planks of elm1 and being brought up by a solid oak bulk beyond1 while the ,enfield ball could not get past the #acth plank4 8,the shooting on ,tuesday was more to satisfy ,lord ,panmure and the other strangers present upon the comparative merits of the two weapons than to show the limit of what each could do under favourable circumstances4 ,still1 the targets of every #aj shots on either side bore decisive evidence of the superiority of the new rifle1 as a glance at the following table will prove3-- ---------------------------------------- ,range in,elevation4,figure of ,,rifle4 yards4 ,merit4 ---------------------------------------- ,deg4 ,feet4 ,whitworth #bbb #ada ,enfield #hjj #bde #efg ,whitworth #abg ,enfield #ejj -- #ccj ,whitworth #acc ,enfield #ejj -- #dja ---------------------------------------- 8,the last entry in the table records the mean radial distance from a central point of #aj shots fired from a table-rest1 by ,colonel ,hay and ,mr4 ,gunner1 the manager of the ,enfield factory4 ,both are first-rate marksmen1 yet at #ejj yards the ,manchester rifle in the hands of the former gives three times as good shooting as the latter can get out of the ,government arm4 ,all the other trials were made by firing from a beautifully-constructed machine rest1 which placed both weapons on a footing of perfect equality as to the conditions under which they were tested4 ,in addition to the foregoing experiments1 there was one for showing that with cylindro-conoidal balls on the expansion principle of those used for the ,enfield rifle1 very superior shooting could be obtained from ,whitworth's hexagonal bore4 ,this was most satisfactorily established1 the mean deviation on the target from the centre of the group of #aj hits being only #he of a foot at #ejj yards' range4 ,it will be observed that at #ejj yards' range1 at which the practice commenced1 the shooting of ,whitworth's rifle was so much better than the other that no greater distance was attempted4 ,a reference to the first table of experiments will also demonstrate that the target made by the former weapon at #a1ajj yards is nearly as good as that made by the latter at #ejj4 ,these are great results to have achieved1 and amply justify the forethought of the late ,lord ,hardinge in securing the services of so eminent a mechanic as ,mr4 ,whitworth for the improvement of the rifle4 ,until he took the subject in hand the proper principles for guidance in the construction of the weapon had not been accurately determined4 ,the manufacture was still conducted by rule of thumb1 and in a very hap-hazard way on the most important points4 ,the use of grooves and an expansive projectile made it impossible to secure the requisite amount of pitch in the rifling and the indispensable hardness of metal in the bullet for penetration4 ,moreover1 from the small amount of bearing1 the wear and tear both in the barrel and in the projectile were enormous1 and the length of the latter could not be increased without causing it to capsize in its flight4 ,by the polygonal bore and rapid pitch to which the form of the bullet accurately conforms1 ,mr4 ,whitworth has rendered stripping impossible1 and1 his rifle when fired acting exactly like a male and female screw1 the projectile must rotate with perfect steadiness and precision on its axis4 ,he can increase its length so considerably as to secure space for converting it into a shell if necessary2 and1 being able to use metal of any degree of hardness1 he can adapt its form and strength exactly to the work which it has to perform4 ,thus with a rifle #ci inches long and half-inch bore1 having a turn in #bj inches1 or two turns in its length1 he finds no difficulty in penetrating a wrought-iron plate #f-ajths of an inch thick or cutting a core out of a piece of solid timber half a foot thick2 and some idea may be formed of the extraordinary power of this arm when we mention that his projectiles in their flight rotate at the rate of #ae1jjj revolutions per minute4 ,the question of driving holes in the #d-;inch breast plates of floating batteries is at once solved by the application of these principles to artillery1 the construction of which this new rifle proves must be completely revolutionized4 ,a weapon which in expert hands will make good practice at #a1djj yards1 and the range of which can be very easily helped by a telescope if necessary1 gives the coup de grace to our present system of field batteries4 ,at the ,alma it would have silenced the ,russian guns or driven them from their position1 rendering the rush of the ,light ,division1 with the heavy loss of life consequent thereon1 unnecessary4 ,nor during the siege of ,sebastopol would the rope mantlets of the ,redan and the ,malakhoff having given much protection to the men working behind the embrasures10 c41 c41 c4 ,so much for the praise bestowed by ,mr4 ,whitworth on his own production4 ,a beautiful experiment it has been1 and one for which the scientific world is bound to be thankful2 giving1 as it does1 perhaps a faint idea only of what is yet to be effected4 ,however1 all is not gold that glitters3 it is very well to do all this by straining every principle that can be brought to bear1--extra charge1 bullets hardened and turned with mathematical precision1 steel barrels1 with a fineness of polish in the interior like that of a looking-glass--these are all great adjuncts in the trial against an ordinary unprepared gun1 taken from a number promiscuously1 and which perhaps might be the worst specimen in the possession of the party at ,hythe4 ,but these are trifles when compared with the two following facts4 ,the diameter of the bore of ,mr4 ,whitworth's is #ejj1 or half-inch at the largest diameter1 and #dej at the smallest1 or a mean1 taking the two extremes1 of fifty bore2 the ,enfield is #egg1 or twenty-five bore1 and the bullets on leaving the guns were the same weight exactly4 ,the length of the ,enfield bullet is #g_/h inch1 that of the ,whitworth is #a-c_/h inch4 ,but all this will be more fully seen from the woodcuts4 ,illustration3 ,,enfield ,,barrel ,,and ,,pritchett ,,bullets4 ,illustration3 ,,whitworth ,,barrel ,,and ,,bullets4 ,thus it will be seen that the amount of resistance or displacement of atmospheric air by one bullet is nearly double that of the other1 and this is a most important point in ,mr4 ,whitworth's favour2 but the quantity of gunpowder used in the one is precisely the same as that used in the other1 though ,mr4 ,whitworth's rifle is little more than half the size of bore1 the pressure on the square inch being consequently nearly double2 hence the circumstances are not sufficiently equal for ,mr4 ,whitworth to claim for his rifle any great superiority3 the gun may take the attention of the unwary1 but its principles will not bear investigation4 ,let me change the circumstances of the case1 by retaining the principle of the ,enfield1 but changing the bore to the same as ,mr4 ,whitworth's1 increasing at the same time the length of projectile1 and ,i will engage to beat it with a much reduced charge4 ,the extreme degree of female screw or spiral1 one turn in twenty inches1 or two turns in the whole length of the barrel1 creates1 as must be familiar to the most obtuse mind1 an enormous amount of friction1 and in consequence of this an equal quantity of force is absorbed3 in other words1 there is a useless waste of force4 ,the ,enfield barrel has but a proportion of turn1 one in six feet six inches1 or exactly half a spiral in the three feet three1 generating #cjj per cent4 less friction than in the ,whitworth rifle2 so that on this score alone the saving would be very great1 and in this trial the ,whitworth would be inferior to the ,enfield2 the inventor1 therefore1 has unjustly laid claim to superiority1 as the trial has been conducted on very unequal terms4 ,mr4 ,whitworth says his bullet rotates at the rate of #ae1jjj revolutions in a minute2 now the friction on the periphery of a bullet having this extreme spinning on an axis1 must very much lessen its range4 ,if we weigh force1 and carefully calculate its expenditure in #b1jjj yards1 the periphery has made #d1jjj revolutions4 ,now look at the shape of the hexagonal body depicted in the woodcut at page #cgg1 and estimate the friction it will undergo4 ,the ,enfield in the same distance would rotate only #a1jjj times1 thus affording another gain of #cjj per cent4 ,the question1 therefore1 which arises is this3 ,if all this can be done equally well with the ,enfield1 why not do it8 ,and the answer is1 because there is nothing to be gained by it4 ,great doubts now exist whether the bore #be is not too great a reduction3 in fact1 you will find no military advocates for it4 ,the faculty will tell you that small wounds are not so destructive as large ones3 the human body is as much affected by the shock as by the penetration of a bullet4 ,many other reasons might be advanced in favour of increased size of bullet1 and much more important reasons must be given1 before the whole military system has to be re-changed1 than a mere gain of #cjj or #djj yards2 whilst there can be little doubt that the ranges we now possess in the ,enfield are more than equivalent to our wants4 ,the human eye cannot define precisely at #ijj or #a1jjj yards1 and yet greater accuracy is required to fire a ball at a distance of #b1jjj yards2 again1 it is a question which has frequently arisen in my mind1 in how many situations in ,england or on the ,continent can we get a clear view of #b1jjj yards4 ,the effort1 indeed1 to increase range appears like seeking after a remedy for a disease which has never yet been discovered4 ,if ranges of #b1jjj yards and upwards are required1 rifled cannon will again take their proper place2 for on investigating the tables of practice published by ,general ,jacob1 ,i find the average distance of shot from the centre of butt to be1 at #b1jjj yards1 nearly #i feet1 with #acg degrees elevation2 whilst the ,whitworth is said to be #aa-a_/b feet1 with about #h degrees of elevation4 ,i saw1 some time ago1 some practice at ,shoeburyness with an #ah-pounder rifle cannon1 which gave a range of #c1fej yards1 with an elevation of #jaj-c_/d degrees1 and a breeze blowing across1 a mean deflection of only #cj inches from the centre4 ,this throws ,jacob1 ,whitworth1 and the ,enfield all into the shade together2 yet there can be no doubt that this can be excelled1 when heavier guns are brought to the same state of perfection as this #ah-pounder4 ,the case therefore stands thus3 the ,jacob rifle has a greater range than the ,enfield1 at a cost of #ajj per cent4 more friction1 and an expenditure of #ej per cent4 more of projectile force2 the ,whitworth has also a greater range1 but at a cost of #cjj per cent4 more friction1 and #ajj per cent4 additional projectile force4 ,with these observations ,i leave this subject in the hands of the public1 being convinced that projectile power obtained at such a cost will never come into general use2 though the production of the ,whitworth rifle will always be looked upon as an experiment of very great interest4 ,there is but one other point relating to the use of guns on such a principle1 and that is their safety2 which is always of the greatest importance4 ,it is a well-known fact that the first movement of projectiles depends very much on the amount of inertia in that projectile2 and different forms of projectiles1 though of the same weight1 will offer very different amounts of resistance to motion4 ,no one can doubt that two columns of lead1 each of an ounce in weight1 one being as high again as the other1 will offer different amounts of resistance2 first1 from the law that the time occupied in overcoming inertia is in proportion to the length of that body2 secondly1 if these columns of metals are confined in tubes1 then the friction on the one which is half an inch long will be much less than on the other1 which is one inch in length3 and this is1 on the mildest terms1 the relative position of the two4 ,there can be no doubt that a much greater pressure is required to start the longer column of double the length2 but when we consider that there are the facets of six angles1 with a spiral inclination of one in nineteen1 the difficulty of starting this bullet becomes still more apparent4 ,now suppose the gun has been loaded a few hours1 and a certain amount of adhesion has been effected between the bullet and sides of the barrel1 by the unctuous deposit from previous discharges1 then the difficulty of starting the bullet instantaneously will be still more increased3 supposing the breech end of a barrel1 with the ordinary charge of the ,enfield cartridge and bullet1 has a force exerted upon it of #b1jjj pounds in the square inch1 then in the hexagonal not much less than double that strength will be requisite to meet the contingencies of dirty guns3 in fact ,i know that a serious accident did occur very recently with a double rifle constructed on ,whitworth's principle1 notwithstanding all the care bestowed upon it by a first-rate maker2 and ,i believe that this gun1 if it is to be used with safety1 must have a barrel double the strength of other rifles4 ,the doubtful nature of ,mr4 ,whitworth's experiments must be apparent from the fact that they were made in a shed1 from which strong currents of air were excluded3 any bullet would range accurately in vacuo1 or in atmosphere equally quiescent2 deductions1 therefore1 drawn from such experiments must be worthless4 ,battles occur not under such favourable circumstances2 protuberances on bullets tell most in high currents1 and least in a quiet atmosphere2 so that had the experiments been instituted in the open air1 they would doubtless have yielded a different result4 ,the hexagonal bullet of large size has been proved to be very eccentric indeed in its flight2 hence a bullet of the smallest dimensions was used1 for had it been larger1 its great enemy1 the atmosphere1 would have rendered the chance of even partial success perfectly hopeless4 ,now1 observe what would be the effect of extension of length and decrease of diameter in the ,greenerean expansive bullet4 ,harden it by alloys1 as adopted in the ,whitworth2 use the same charge1 and the probability is great1 that1 from the absence of extreme friction1 it will excel in range1 accuracy1 and penetration the ,whitworth1 as much as that does now the ,enfield4 ,if the ,government can see any important advantage to be gained by extending the range we now possess2 if anything is to be gained by reduction from #be to #ej bore2 if1 indeed1 there is any point which is advantageous in the ,whitworth1 ,i will pledge my reputation that this may be obtained in the expansive principle3 and that1 too1 with a much less expenditure of expellant force4 ,the 8hoodwinking0 of the public by not disclosing the fact that the pressure of the gunpowder in the ,whitworth was double1 the bore being but one-half1 is at best an attempt at concealment not creditable to the parties concerned4 ,knowledge of the principles which regulate projectile science is not so scanty as to allow the palm to be carried away from the profession1 and worn by a gentleman who1 on his own admission1 is unpractised in the science of gunnery4 ,the science to be effectually improved must be carried on at the cost of the nation1 as ,mr4 ,whitworth's experiments were4 ,this fact certainly bears the appearance of a good precedent1 and ,i hope it may be extended4 ,mr4 ,whitworth1 like ,general ,jacob1 has had to sacrifice scientific economy in order to obtain the points he required4 ,i have already dilated upon the truism that all projectiles range with the greatest economy which have the centre of gravity in the head or fore part of the bullet4 ,i have also pointed out the fact that the elongated projectiles which have not the centre of gravity in the head1 turn over during their flight after leaving the muzzle of the gun2 and this is also found to be the case in rifles having a greater degree of spiral than the ,enfield1 one turn in six feet #f inches4 ,to meet this difficulty1 therefore1 ,general ,jacob adopts one turn of spiral in every three feet3 thus his bullet in passing out has double the friction of the ,enfield2 and when we look at the fact that he is further compelled to increase the length of his bullet to #b-a_/b diameters1 a little reflection will point out the entire want of economy in his whole arrangement4 ,on turning to the ,whitworth1 we find that1 in order to ensure his bullet keeping point foremost in its flight1 he has to double the very great spiral adopted by ,jacob3 thus we have all its concomitant disadvantages1 friction1 expenditure of matter1 and danger of bursting the gun4 ,when we contemplate such arrangements as exist in these two guns1 it must be evident that they are both self-destructive4 ,no system of projectiles can be durable which is effected by straining all the acknowledged principles of mechanics2 and this has been done in each of these cases4 ,the scientific world knows well that a much higher rate of speed can be attained in railway travelling than is daily practised2 but they also know that it can only be obtained in the same way as ,jacob and ,whitworth obtained their range in gunnery3 namely1 by an excessive expenditure of fuel1 and a wear of engine amounting to comparative destruction2 whilst1 at the same time1 the danger is so much increased that it would be folly and recklessness to persist in such a course4 ,the question1 therefore1 resolves itself into this2 that in locomotion and in projectile science1 if we would have them perfect1 we must study the mode of obtaining the greatest results with the least expenditure of means4 ,facility of loading must at all times be of great importance3 the soldier cannot have the means of cleaning his rifle when in action1 and yet if the hexagonal principle were to be adopted1 it must be repeatedly cleaned1 or it would be almost impossible to load it1 and when discharged it would either burst or its fire would not be effective4 ,during such a war as that in ,india1 going on day and night1 a soldier could not be expected to wash out his rifle after every half-dozen shots4 ,the field in which experiments are carried on is very different from that of a battle4 ,experiments1 as detailed1 sometimes turn out most fallacious when put to the use for which they are intended2 and in no case is this more apparent than in breech-loading arms3 thousands of rounds may be fired in a few days with great success2 but extend that over twelve months1 a certain number being fired every day1 and the gun being cleaned after each day's practice1 and long before thousands are fired1 the gun displays weak points--points which could not be discovered in the lesser experiment4 ,so it is in practice3 a gun left dirty for hours is undergoing rapid destruction2 the unctuous deposit from gunpowder has such an affinity for iron that minute galvanic cells are formed on its surface in a very short time3 half an hour after a gun has been discharged in a damp atmosphere these operations may be seen to be going on with rapidity1 and an old gun on the hexagonal principle 7if one should last long enough to grow old7 would not be a very desirable weapon1 in point of safety4 ,the comparative cost of ammunition for the hexagonal rifle and the ,enfield1 is a point of no little importance4 ,calculation gives the former at something equivalent to #d-a_/b;d4 or #e;d4 at each discharge1 while the latter cannot exceed #a-a_/d;d41 or at most #a-a_/b;d4--a serious question for the ,chancellor of the ,exchequer4 ,that this sum may be lessened by the employment of machinery is not unlikely2 but this can only be done to a limited extent1 it being essential that mathematical nicety1 as well as the right degree of hardness1 should be strictly observed1 otherwise the power of penetration will be sacrificed3 and of this property a great deal has been made4 ,there are few who do not know that a pound hammer will soon drive to the head a fine-pointed slender nail2 whilst a short1 thick1 stumpy nail requires three times the force3 again1 if fine steel polished nails were constructed1 a still smaller amount of force would suffice4 ,if such effects are carefully studied1 much may be done with very little means4 ,very recently a statement appeared in the press that1 owing to some ill-made cartridges being served out to the troops in ,india1 the men found it almost impossible to load their ,enfield rifles at all2 having to call in the aid of trees and stones against which to butt the ramrod1 in order to force the bullet home4 ,the same account attributed this defect to the careless construction of these cartridges by the contractors4 ,this1 however1 is unjust2 all cartridges for the ,enfield rifles being alone produced in the laboratory at ,woolwich2 and hence the defect is the more unpardonable4 ,it is easy to conceive that in ,india1 where the heat is intense1 the grease on the cartridge might have disappeared2 the unctuous deposit of gunpowder on the interior of the barrel is also rendered more adhesive1 and necessarily offers greater obstruction to the ramming down of the bullet4 ,the very slight difference between the diameter of the bullet and that of the bore1 or windage1 must necessarily add to the difficulty under such circumstances2 but if half a size1 or a few decimals of diameter1 were taken from the sides of the bullet and added to its length1 the difficulty would be effectually removed3 with increased length1 and increasing means of expansion1 if necessary1 such an occurrence could never take place4 ,the original expanding bullet was intended to fill up the difference of three sizes of gauge2 surely1 then1 there can be no difficulty in expanding a much less diameter of bullet one half1 or even full one size of gauge4 ,where would be the difficulty in having the bullet #bf-;bore1 or even smaller1 and expanding it to #be4 ,the occurrence1 indeed1 of such a fact as that alluded to is to an intelligent mind quite incomprehensible2 it could only arise from gross incompetency--some cobbling with the bullet's cup in the pressing1 or perhaps enlargement by wear1 or more likely still from the pulp-made cartridge paper4 ,that this difficulty has been experienced is obvious2 and the inference is strong1 that the official managers of these affairs are still in the midst of a long experiment3 it is clear that they are not perfectly masters of the practice of gunnery1 and it is almost time the people of this country had their work better done4 ,it is more than probable that1 instead of meeting this difficulty with the proper spirit of improvement1 they will fly off at some other tangent1 and adopt the nostrum of some 8arrant quack20 thus effectually adding to the complication4 ,each regiment ought to have moulds1 and the means of making their cartridges on such emergencies2 a body of provident officials ought to attend to this1 that a repetition of it may be avoided4 ,an ordinary mind would have perceived that1 in such lengthened operations as those our soldiers have been engaged in1 the cleaning of their arms would be almost impossible2 still the men are not instructed that in such a difficulty an oiled rag passed up and down the barrel would diminish it2 neither is such a simple remedy provided3 let us trust1 however1 that this misfortune will lead to improvement4 ,if this difficulty is encountered in the ,enfield1 which is1 comparatively speaking1 a smooth bore1 what would be the difficulty in the hexagonal bore with two turns in #ci inches6 ,the possibility of loading the latter would be very remote indeed1 if not quite impracticable1 and a total bar to anything like its general adoption4 ,pure lead is indispensable for all rifle bullets1 but more especially for the expansive1 which is in reality useless without it4 ,a lubricating grease1 of a given consistency for various climates1 is also a desideratum yet to be accomplished2 how desirable it would be1 is shown by all the accounts of good shooting ,i have ever received or met with4 ,a vast number of projectiles have been produced1 and strenuously advocated2 but from the total want of scientific arrangement in their construction they have had but a very short existence4 ,the vital principle in all elongated projectiles is to have the centre of gravity in the fore end2 wanting that1 an unnecessary spinning motion must be resorted to1 at the cost of immense friction3 for the tendency to change position can only be obviated by excessive spiral motion2 whilst in a bullet having the centre of gravity in the head1 much less spiral motion suffices3 its scientific construction admits of no tendency to change2 straight forward is its natural inclination1 and to this inclination it adheres4 ,a late writer on projectiles has laboured hard to condemn the expansive principle and the cup2 he has even aspired to lecture on it before ,royalty1 and as an improvement upon it1 he recommends the following invention of his own3-- 8,in my endeavours to remedy the evils which have been so often and justly complained of1 ,i attempted the construction of several bullets1 particularly with the view of solving the question--can a cylindro-conoidal bullet be contrived1 which will have a flat surface for its base1 and the centre of gravity in the fore part8 ,in my attempts from time to time ,i met with less or more success until ,i arrived at my last improvement1 the principle of which has afforded me so much satisfaction1 that ,i fancy ,i have only to describe it1 to enable any intelligent marksman to perceive at once the utility of the contrivance4 8,in the end of the bullet1 which is a fair cylinder for half its length1 ,i formed a cavity of a conical form1 similar to the inside of a small thimble1 which stretches forward somewhat more than half the length of the bullet1 and which is wide enough to reduce sufficiently the weight of the hinder end1 so as to throw the centre of gravity into the fore part1 even after the explosion of the charge takes place4 ,on the edge of the cavity ,i made an indentation1 or shoulder1 about a twelfth of an inch in depth1 and upon this ,i placed an iron disc of the same thickness1 which closes up the cavity even with the end of the bullet1 making a flat surface of that part2 so that it may be called a hollow flat-ended bullet1 though to all appearance solid40 ,the adoption of the disc1 and the closing of the orifice at the bottom of the bullet1 is merely the production of an elongated plug with weak sides1 which must necessarily be driven in upon themselves1 and thus shortened2 and in so doing they expand4 ,the disc prevents the possibility of the explosive gases acting upon the centre of gravity or the head1 and thus the advantage of that being the primary motion is lost2 and which ensures the absence of 8wobbling10 a principle inherent in all plug bullets after leaving the muzzle3 and a defect which it was the main object of my invention to avoid4 ,the idea is evidently that of ,captain ,norton1 as evinced in his rifle shell1 and consequently is a plagiarism1 either deliberate or accidental4 ,illustration3 ,,swiss ,,bullet4 ,the ,swiss bullet has obtained to some extent a reputation1 admitting1 like the ,lancaster elliptical bullet1 of being put into higher velocity4 ,its range1 however1 is limited1 from the very great friction it undergoes in passing up the barrel3 it is driven in upon itself until it becomes a mere plug of lead with a hemispherical head2 and the centre of gravity being behind1 ensures its flight frequently terminating by turning 8topsy turvy40 ,moreover1 it cannot be used on a large scale1 except by the addition of a hard metal point1 as in ,general ,jacob's bullet4 ,the wisdom displayed in rifling barrels with the gathering or deepening groove may be doubted2 it admits of serious consideration1 whether or not it tends to increase the friction of the bullet passing outward4 ,it is evident that did the bullet expand all at once it would do so2 but as this is well known not to be the case1 the question arises what is the advantage gained8 for it is asserted on high authority that it improves the shooting4 ,the mere deepening of the grooves at the breech end can have but little effect2 and the question is1 does the shallowing of the grooves as the bullet approaches the muzzle1 produce the effect8 ,we think it does4 ,in the process of rifling these barrels1 the rifling tool1 by a very ingenious arrangement of screws1 is caused gradually to cut deeper as it travels from the muzzle to the breech1 so that when finished the depth of grooves at the muzzle is #jje of an inch2 half-way down the barrel it is #jaj1 and at the breech end #jae3 thus gradually deepening #aj_/ajjj of an inch1 whereas the usual method of rifling is to have one uniform depth of #jaj inches4 ,from the contraction of the protuberances on the bullet from #a_/aj to #a_/ejjj of an inch in passing up the barrel1 results the apparent benefit3 such a reduction would surely allow of the bullet continuing its flight with less friction on the atmosphere2 for it cannot be too often repeated that perfect smoothness1 even to a polished surface1 is essential to the easy passage of all bullets through the air4 ,there are some rather curious deductions obtained by practice alone1 which to ordinary minds appear of trifling importance2 but they clearly show that correct rifle-shooting can only be obtained by the most perfect arrangement in the rifling and scientific construction of the barrels4 ,the ,government have lately adopted a highly finished and costly rifle arm1 with sword bayonet attached to the usual form of bar soldered to the end of the barrels on the right side4 ,when these barrels were first constructed1 they were made lighter than experience subsequently showed they ought to be2 for it was found that the barrel not expanding equally with the other portions at this necessarily rigid point1 influenced the shooting of the gun to a considerable extent2 so that an increase of metal was found necessary4 ,the difficulty of obtaining good shooting with double rifles1 one side of each barrel being held rigid whilst the other is yielding1 explains the difficulty1 and points to the remedy3 an increase of metal1 or1 what would be more convenient1 the adoption of the most perfect laminated steel for all double rifles2 it being self-evident that soft barrels and correct rifle-shooting are to a certain extent incompatible4 ,double rifles have nearly superseded single ones2 for few who can afford the additional price will use the latter1 when in the same weight he can have two useful weapons4 ,the one great end generally sought in a rifle is sufficient weight to neutralise the force of the explosion or recoil2 and the additional barrel answers this as effectually as additional thickness of iron in the single4 ,but there is one objection which ,i have never been able to master in the construction of double rifle barrels1 and ,i much doubt the possibility of effectually overcoming it--another proof that mathematical demonstrations are frequently wrong in practice1 however correct in theory4 ,many hold it to be essential that double rifle barrels should be put together perfectly parallel4 ,i followed this rule1 and was at considerable cost in perfecting tools for the purpose2 yet1 strange to say1 in trial ,i found invariably that the right barrel threw the ball slightly to the right1 and the left to the left4 ,this ,i have been at enormous trouble to ascertain1 and am enabled positively to declare it is an indisputable fact4 ,the cause of it is evidently the recoil not striking the stock in the centre1 but on one side2 which causes the gun to swerve to that side4 ,however small or unapparent the recoil may be1 still there is a recoil2 and hence its effect4 ,to remedy this it is necessary to incline the barrels in1 towards the muzzle1 to counteract that tendency2 but in doing this another evil is created1 for you can only do this to suit a given distance1 either #ajj1 #aej1 or #bjj yards1 as may be determined4 ,thus it will be perceived a deficiency must exist at all times2 and it shows clearly the necessity for motion being resisted centrically1 if truth is to be maintained4 ,this defect in the double rifle will always be a drawback to the 8most correct shooting20 yet under ordinary circumstances it may not be a matter of vital importance1 neither does there exist any means of sighting to overcome the difficulty4 ,the only way to obtain a double rifle perfectly true--perfectly parallel1 is to construct the barrels one above the other1 as double pistols are now constructed4 ,the only objection to them is the difficulty attending the arrangement of the locks1 as one cock must strike the nipple the thickness of the barrel below the other1 and is an unsightly matter at best4 ,these facts lead to another1 namely1 the necessity of all rifles being stocked as straight as possible1 avoiding in all cases any casting off in the butt2 as it is evident that these matters have considerable influence on the correctness of shooting4 ,one great drawback to correct shooting is produced from the stock being thrown off at the butt end2 and1 in other cases1 from imperfections in the stocking of the gun--all truth depending on the barrel or barrels being both stocked and held perfectly level in the act of using4 ,it must be quite clear1 that in case the right barrel of a pair be depressed but the #cbnd part of an inch1 the angle of the sight on the top1 instead of giving elevation1 will cause the line of flight of ball to be to the left1 and 8vice vers40 ,therefore1 first of all be sure the gun is held square2 and great advantage will be found in pointing the muzzle in all cases a few feet below the object1 and raising it in a perfect line upwards to the bull's eye4 ,if this can be done well1 in addition to the gun being held square1 the better half of the difficulty is overcome2 further practice will make perfect4 ,the point next in importance1 is to take off the weight of the pull in the trigger1 during the upward motion2 overcoming the last atom of weight as the muzzle sight covers the bull's eye4 ,it must be done so gradually1 that no jerk or pull can move the gun1 be it ever so triflingly3 in fact1 all good shots fire thus while the gun is in motion4 ,if the sight cannot be correctly obtained during the movement1 always take the rifle down from the shoulder1 and raise it again2 for depend upon it1 rifle shooting can never be acquired perfectly1 where the habit is practised of holding the gun at the shoulder1 8poking0 the muzzle about and seeking the bull's eye4 ,all good shooting is produced from the shoulder2 an absence of pulsation in the body which is induced by holding a weight4 ,the shoulder rests are found to be the cause of vibration2 resting one part of the body and straining another begets it instantly1 and where rests are used they should be merely supports for the muzzle1 and not for the centre of the gun4 ,if the centre is placed upon it1 the action of recoil is almost sure to jump the gun upwards4 ,the best shooting can be accomplished from the shoulder1 if the above instructions be carefully followed4 ,avoid in all cases gripping a rifle tightly1 or you will most assuredly communicate the pulsation of the body to the rifle4 ,during the ,crimean war many of the ,enfield rifles expanded so much with the ,pritchett plug bullet as not only to loosen all the bands on the stock1 but also to produce a visible effect on the barrel2 and to remedy this the ,government adopted my expanding screw bands1 which admit of being tightened by the screw when necessary4 ,the production of a perfect breech-loading small arm is as difficult as the production of a perfect breech-loading cannon1 and that is so problematical as to amount1 in my humble opinion1 to nearly an impossibility4 ,all experience teaches that a perfectly sound base of projection in the gun is indispensable1 if good direction and velocity are required2 without which there can be no good shooting4 ,if this be a law1 how can it be obtained where soundness is absent8 ,joints1 slides1 and their attendants1 are all incompatible with soundness3 the two cannot exist together2 and hence no breech-loader can give the same results as a solid constructed gun barrel1 unsoundness and absorption of power being always found to go hand in hand together4 ,i have had considerable experience in breech-loading guns1 having obtained one or two patents2 and very careful attention to the subject has satisfied me that the question was sufficiently ventilated soon after the adoption of gunnery1 and that it was exhausted by many hundreds of inventors as ingenious as those of the present day2 the result being in all cases a total failure4 ,one of the best breech-loading carbines of the present day is undoubtedly that of ,mr4 ,f4 ,w4 ,prince1 and those to whom they are unobjectionable will certainly find in this the simplest and a most effective weapon of the kind3 ,mr4 ,prince has certainly made the most of the practical knowledge he has brought to bear upon the invention4 ,revolving rifles are1 like revolving pistols1 complicated weapons1 useful only for certain purposes2 requiring1 as they do1 very great care and cleanliness1 to insure at best their limited services4 ,long barrels are useless1 because all the velocity that can be given to the projectile has to be generated in the revolving chambers2 all the superfluous force escaping at the joint of breeches and barrels4 ,for any useful purpose1 a nine-inch would be better than a longer barrel1 allowing the bullet to leave the muzzle at a much higher velocity than it would do after passing through a barrel of thirty inches4 ,it is evident1 indeed1 that a revolving pistol and a revolving rifle are possessed of power in inverse ratio to their lengths4 ,the ,french ,government are making great efforts to improve their military system1 in imparting to every soldier as much information relative to his weapons and the best method of using them1 as is compatible with his limited education4 ,their institution of a normal-school for the instruction of the whole army in all that relates to guns1 shooting1 and natural 8trigonometry10 is proof of this4 ,a detachment from every infantry regiment in the service arrives at 8,vincennes0 early in the spring1 and the men undergo a complete course of instruction during the whole of the summer and autumn months1 or until by ability they acquire all that is to be taught4 ,the first and a very essential part of the duty is to teach them to judge of distance2 for this purpose a soldier takes a target1 and runs straight ahead as far as he pleases4 ,having planted it1 each man is called upon to judge the distance1 which is recorded in a report of the day4 ,this exercise is carried on to a great extent1 until each becomes well able to judge correctly2 then commences the instruction in shooting1 each soldier using an elevation according to the distance he calculates he is from the target2 and this is practised at all distances1 from #ejj to #a1jjj paces4 ,the greatest degree of perfection attained by the instructed is rewarded1 by promotion or otherwise2 and such skill in shooting is displayed by these various detachments as would truly astonish our military officers4 ,the accomplishment of a school of instruction for teachers of rifle shooting to the ,british army is now an established fact2 the results1 most flattering to the projectors1 more than verifying their anticipations4 ,the degree of perfection attained by some before leaving ,hythe is so extraordinary1 that ,i will leave the reality to be imagined or witnessed2 and it will well repay the journey4 ,the standing order lately issued1 awarding substantial benefits to the adept in shooting1 is sure to bear its fruits1 and is only the first step to many others of no less importance4 ,double rifled carbines can be constructed of so light a weight that their exclusive use for cavalry purposes is not far distant1 #e-a_/b pounds being sufficient weight to ensure perfect safety4 ,a carbine of this description1 from #ah to #bj inches in the barrel1 could give a practical range of from #fjj to #gjj yards1 with an extreme range of #a1jjj to #a1ajj4 ,a cavalry soldier armed with two of these would be equal to four of the present day1 for they would be no greater encumbrance than the late carbine used by the ,guards1 which approaches #aj lbs4 in weight2 and a pair of double carbines could easily be carried at the saddle bow1 their length being no obstacle4 ,revolvers have not yet been1 and ,i fear they never can be1 made sufficiently durable to become a useful cavalry appendage4 ,the fact may be concealed1 but it is true1 nevertheless1 that their fragile nature1 independently of their great cost1 will always confine their use to an exclusive few3 indeed1 revolving and breech-loading weapons are among the doubtful class of arms1 not fully developed as yet1 even if they ever can be4 ,the adoption of double carbines will eventually throw all other small arms for cavalry purposes into the back ground2 a range of #a1jjj yards with a toy #e-a_/b lbs4 in weight is one of the greatest wonders of this wonderful age1 showing the astonishing change which has been effected in gunnery3 for a deadly power now exists in the most ,lilliputian toy as well as in the ,brobdignagian monster2 and that1 too1 at immense distances4 ,in proof of this1 ,i will just quote a letter from that gallant officer1 ,lieutenant ,william ,a4 ,kerr1 ,southern ,mahratta ,irregular ,horse4 8,camp1 ,bejapore1 ,may #bith1 #aheh4 8,,sir1 8,i have received the ,enfield carbine1 and am much pleased with it in every respect4 ,it cannot1 ,i consider1 be improved on1 and is by far the best weapon for the mounted service ,i have ever handled4 ,it is but due to you that ,i should mention1 that your work1 as put into the carbine1 is far beyond what ,i expected at the money4 ,i hope to be in a position1 at no very distant date1 to give you a heavy commission1 and will certainly recommend you in every way ,i can4 ,i have knocked over a deer at #djj yards with the carbine1 and make very good practice up to #hjj yards1 by firing with two drachms of fine rifle powder4 ,i have given it1 and ,prince's breech-loader1 a fair trial2 the latter cannot be compared to the former2 it has not the same range1 power of projection1 or of shooting2 it moreover fouls in the proportion of at least #c to #a more4 ,had ,i had such carbines at ,kolapore1 ,i would have destroyed the #bgth ,native ,infantry in an hour4 8,i am1 sir1 yours1 c41 8,,william ,a4 ,,kerr40 ,the weight of this single carbine is only #e-a_/d lbs41 and it is #bj inches in the barrel4 ,the great power of shooting would justify a reduction of length to #ae inches1 thus reducing the weight to a little over #d-a_/d lbs42 and yet this carbine would be more certain in its effects at #fjj yards1 than old ,brown ,bess at #aej4 ,the complaint that carbines are found to be an encumbrance in the service is no longer valid3 they may be made to form merely a portion of the saddle with the same facility of handling as a pistol1 and with a hundredfold greater accuracy of range4 ,illustration3 ,mr4 ,greener's ,model ,carbine1 #bb inches long in the barrel1 4#egg bore1 #e-a_/d lbs4 weight4 ,the hybrid affair1 adopted by the ,government1 of a pistol made to serve as a carbine by the introduction of a loose butt1 is of doubtful utility3 if valuable as a carbine1 it will never be used as a pistol2 hence it had been much better to make it a carbine at once1 thus rendering it at the same time more durable and less costly3 even a double carbine might be constructed at about twice the price paid for the socket joint alone4 ,but there is still a want in the ,government establishment of 8designers0 of ability2 all that has been effected by way of improvement has been done by feeling the way3 a kind of progressional experiment1 with a total absence of mind to grasp good ideas1 and to hold them fast4 ,the arms used by the corps of ,guides who have distinguished themselves so much in ,india are now seven years old1 and they will bear comparison with the best arms our ,government are only just now producing3 in fact1 the irregular cavalry in ,india have always been armed with weapons in advance of those of the ,government troops2 and the explanation of this is very suggestive1 they provide arms for themselves1 and are more alive than the ,government officials to the importance of having good ones4 ,the adoption of greased cartridges in ,india by some irregular corps1 took place in carbines supplied by me eight or nine years ago2 and the origin of the idea was this3-- ,the principal objection urged against the adoption of the rifle1 is that of loading4 ,i know not how quickly it is possible to load a musket2 but with cartridges properly made1 ,i think ,i could load and fire a rifle four times in a minute4 ,but then it will be said1 at the conclusion of so many shots1 the rifle gets so foul1 that it will be difficult to get the ball down4 ,not difficult at all4 ,have your cartridges made with a saturated cover1 to surround the ball1 and fit properly the grooves of the rifle4 ,it would clean the barrel so much1 as to allow forty shots to be fired with as much ease as you now fire twenty4 ,or let a steel-wire brush be attached to the rifle2 and by screwing it to the end of the rod1 you can1 by two or three times rubbing up and down1 remove any accumulation of dirt from the powder4 ,if1 however1 the covering ,i have mentioned were used with a weighty rod to the rifle1 there would be no occasion for cleaning1 short of fifty shots4 ,experience leaves no room for doubt that a few grooves are better than many1 in all expansive-principled rifles3 the nearer the approach to a smooth surface the better1 and the three divisions of grooves and projections adopted by the ,british ,government is the best to meet all requirements4 ,they will shoot as well as poly-grooved rifles2 and if three grooves give the same result1 more are unnecessary and useless4 ,the advantage of the atmosphere acting to keep the bullet steady by its current down the grooving on the bullet seems to meet with no confirmation2 improved shooting accruing by the grooves being reduced1 as in the case of the gathering-grooved rifle experiments4 ,in all cases of wild animal shooting at short distances with small charges1 the many grooves will be an advantage3 the same as those formerly adopted1 and which are shown in the cut4 ,illustration ,expansive bullets may be effectually used2 but in varying charges1 incidental to game shooting1 the same form of cavity in the bullet as is observed in the ,enfield would not act1 therefore a large cavity would be preferable to enable the less charge to act in expanding the lead into the grooving4 ,for other purposes than war1 rifles will continue to be constructed on the poly-groove principle1 and with spherical bullets4 ,the perfect destruction of various animals is dependent generally on two causes3 the penetration into the body1 and the shock to the system during that act of penetration4 ,no doubt exists that a spherical bullet would combine these two qualities best4 ,the #be bore1 the #cb and #ej hexagonal bore would be1 practically speaking1 useless for the killing of elephants1 tigers1 c4 ,the effectual and instant killing of seals on ice is an illustration3 failing to kill a seal dead1 he will to a certainty reach his hole in the ice1 and disappear1 to the shooter's serious disappointment4 ,small bore elongated bullets were very rapidly adopted1 and as rapidly abandoned4 8,they did not kill dead20 the spherical bullet did this better4 ,it would be wise to pause and consider whether a good military rifle is a good game-shooting rifle or not3 whether the hole in the beast be wide enough4 ,i am inclined to think the reduction to a bore of #be too small for this purpose4 ,in military muskets of smooth bore1 the elongated bullet is not applicable3 very little benefit is gained in using them in a smooth bore2 and1 although the original invention contemplated this1 experience decided otherwise4 ,the spherical bullet being thus indispensable1 it follows that one size should be adopted which combines the greatest number of favourable points4 ,many years ago ,i made numberless experiments to ascertain this fact1 and had it demonstrated beyond all doubt to be a bore of #ah and a bullet of #ai2 the difference in size admitting of the paper of the cartridge with a moderate degree of tightness4 ,the ultimate range of such a musket with three drachms of gunpowder1 would be equal to the range of the ,enfield2 but1 of course1 without one-tenth its accuracy4 ,yet for close quarters1 line-firing1 or quickness of loading1 the musket will hold its place for centuries to come2 and that this opinion is entertained by many officers1 is proved by the fact that our ,government is at this moment issuing contracts for #ajj1jjj plain-bored muskets3 #ag bore1 #c feet #c inches long in the barrel4 ,the near approximation of bore to my standard is suggestive of the influence my writings have had after many years1 as the following extract from my book of #ahdb shows3-- 8,military rifles should never be shorter than three feet--say three feet three inches1 with half-turn of spiral--the length of the musket4 ,they should not be larger in the bore than a ball eighteen to the pound1 as at that length a force1 calculated to throw an extreme distance1 might be generated4 ,whatever may be the arguments for heavy substances1 they do not avail here1 as it is impossible to throw them either with velocity or accuracy2 for there never can be certainty1 where so much elevation is required4 ,the size of ball we have mentioned1 can be thrown with great certainty1 as far1 if not farther1 than any soldier in her ,majesty's service can accurately survey a single object4 ,for the purpose of annoying a dense body of men1 such as a square column1 such a rifle would be an invaluable gun2 as the muskets now made will not throw a ball one-half the distance4 ,as to the actual range of a rifle of this bore and length1 ,i should think it would reach1 effectively1 the distance of #a1ejj yards40 ,the experimental or competitive trials by the ,royal ,engineers at ,chatham to prove the superiority of the elliptical bored rifle over the ,enfield1 is another of those occasional clap-traps with which the public are amused4 ,the ordinary reader would judge and set it down for an established fact that the elliptical rifle was1 as has generally been represented1 an invention purely ,lancasterian1 gun and bullet2 while the real facts are quite contrary3 true1 the barrel is rifled1 slightly elliptical1 and having 8an increasing spiral20 but the ammunition is that of the ,enfield--the 8#8,greenerian' expansive bullet with the centre of gravity in the head40 ,the bullet that ,lancaster adopted1 as well known1 had a leaden plug4 ,i quote from the report of the select committee3-- 8,the plug bullet used by ,mr4 ,lancaster does not appear suitable for military service1 for when the plug is driven into the bullet by the ignition of the powder1 it generally nips the paper of the cartridge between itself and the base of the bullet1 and carries a portion of it away1 as may be seen by the specimens sent to the committee2 upon the amount of paper so carried away by the ball depends the accuracy or inaccuracy of its flight2 and the plugs do not in all cases remain firmly attached to the bullet40 ,what then are these trials conducted to prove8 ,it cannot be the superiority of ,lancaster's bullet2 for he has abandoned that1 8and uses the ,enfield40 ,is it the rifling8--if so1 let us see what the same committee say of that3-- 8,the chief peculiarity of this rifle consists in the inner surface of the barrel being smooth1 instead of cut into grooves1 as in most rifled barrels4 ,as a substitute for grooves1 the interior of the barrel is cut into the form of an ellipse1 whose major axis exceeds the minor by #jje of an inch4 ,the ball is rifled by being forced 7when expanded by the explosion of the gunpowder7 into the major axis of the ellipse1 which thus fulfils the office of grooves in conducting the ball into the required degree of spiral motion4 8,as ,mr4 ,lancaster has adopted the ,american plan of a #8gaining-twist1' or #8increasing spiral1' and applied it to his smooth-bored barrels with elongated projectiles1 it may be as well to consider the merits of this system4 8,the advantages are supposed to be3 8#ast4 ,increased accuracy4 8#bnd4 ,less recoil4 8#crd4 ,an absence of the tendency a ball has1 when starting with a rapid spiral1 to twist the rifle over sideways to the right or left1 according to the inclination of the grooves4 8#dth4 ,a diminution of the tendency a ball has to #8strip' when first started4 8#ast4 ,the alleged increased accuracy has been by some attributed to the supposition that the revolutions of the bullet round its own axis increase in rapidity while passing through the air1 in consequence of having acquired that motion when passing through the barrel1 under the influence of the grooves2 but it is difficult to imagine how a leaden bullet can carry within itself1 after leaving the muzzle1 any power of increasing its own rotatory or progressive motion4 8#bnd4 ,that there should be less recoil is natural1 as the bullet meets with less opposition when first started from a state of rest2 but the amount of recoil in all rifles now made for expanding projectiles is quite inconsiderable1 and not worth noticing4 8#crd4 ,the tendency of a bullet to twist the rifle on one side is now avoided by reducing the spirality of the grooves4 ,instead of being one turn in three or four feet as formerly1 it is now one turn in six feet six inches1 and sometimes only one turn in eight or nine feet4 8#dth4 ,the advocates of this system maintain that a bullet is less likely to #8strip1' or pass out of the barrel without rifling itself1 when conducted gradually into the required degree of spirality4 ,but the question is1 whether in a well-constructed rifle1 the bullet does strip8 and if not1 then a gaining-twist is unnecessary and objectionable1 as it offers to the ball's progress a continually increasing opposition1 while the ball itself is subjected to a continually increasing urging force from the inflamed gunpowder in the barrel1 so that1 as the velocity of the ball increases1 so also does the resistance to its escape4 ,a projectile is set in motion gradually1 and is 7or should be1 if the quality and quantity of the powder1 and the barrel1 have a right proportion to each other7 at its greatest velocity just before leaving the muzzle2 consequently the tendency of a ball would be to yield to the increasing force of the powder and pass straight out of the barrel without following the grooves2 and this more especially in a smooth bore1 which has no clearly defined edges to hold and guide the ball to its proper degree of spirality1 but where the lead may be compressed along the smooth surface so as to pass straight along the barrel40 ,so much for the gaining twist2 it requires no further argument4 ,the oval bore is not an invention of ,mr4 ,lancaster3 it is older than ,captain ,beaufoy's book1 8,scloppetaria10 published in #ahjh1 for in it you will find a description how to rifle a smooth bore2 and he gives drawings of the tools to do it with4 ,if these statements are facts--and ,i defy them being gainsaid--what connection has this gentleman with it at all8 for what purpose is it pompously announced that the ,lancaster elliptical bored rifle shoots superior to the ,enfield1 when there is not such a thing8 ,the superior shooting of one man over another is more than sufficient explanation4 ,the highly unscientific theory of putting a bullet into excessive spiral motion at the instant it has acquired a maximum of velocity is untenable1 admitting of no lucid explanation4 ,the ,enfield rifle has evidently many enemies1 who do not hesitate in injuring her reputation1 nor hesitate about the means of doing it4 ,all elliptical bores are but the two-grooved rifle in disguise3 an idea fast exploding4 ,the truth of my opinion about the two-grooved or ,brunswick rifle1 introduced into the service in #ahdj1 is now proved4 ,many of my readers will recollect that in my books of #ahdb and #ahdf ,i termed this 8an abortion of science30 it has since died with that cognomen2 though it was puffed up1 as my readers will remember1 by many high authorities1 and amongst the rest by ,dr4 ,ure1 who said nearly as much for it as is now advanced in favour of the hexagonal rifle4 ,on referring to the report of the ,select ,committee on ,small ,arms1 published in #aheb1 ,i find the following account of it3-- 8,at all distances above #djj yards the shooting was so wild as to be unrecorded4 ,the ,brunswick rifle has shown itself to be much inferior in point of range to every other arm hitherto noticed4 8,the loading of this rifle is so difficult that it is wonderful how the rifle regiments have continued to use it so long--the force required to ram down the ball being so great as to render any man's hand unsteady for accurate shooting4 ,comment is unnecessary40 ,the ,prussian needle gun1 too1 has departed this life3 another instance of the absurdity of adopting plans containing in themselves the reverse of scientific principles2 for it may safely be accepted as an axiom that success at the present day can only arise to mechanical constructions which are based on those immutable foundations of mechanical science in accordance with great ,nature's laws4 ,that the principles of the expansive or 8,greenerian0 rifles are fast gaining the approbation of all scientific men qualified by their pursuits to judge1 is evident from the fact that ,birmingham has contributed1 within the last twelve months1 a considerable number of workmen to construct ,enfield rifles in all the principal ,states of ,europe4 ,france1 and ,russia especially1 are expending large amounts in manufacturing this arm2 so that it is no stretch of imagination to suppose that in a few years the equilibrium of arms will be again established1 all nations being armed with equally good weapons1 to contrast with the contemptible ones of bygone times4 ,before separating for the recess1 a question was asked from the officials by an honourable member in the ,house of ,commons3--8,when a report would be given in as to the relative merits of the ,enfield and ,whitworth rifles as military weapons80 ,the answer given was evidently intended to mystify2 for1 from the most intimate inquiries ,i have made1 ,i find that no experiments whatever are in progress4 ,the last took place at ,woolwich1 in ,october1 #aheg1 and terminated so very unsatisfactorily1 that ,mr4 ,whitworth wished to make some alterations in his rifles1 in order to overcome the difficulties presented4 ,up to the present time the authorities inform me that no other rifles have been sent in for further trial4 ,the defects demonstrated in these experiments were precisely those pointed out in this chapter4 ,on reversing their positions1 8hard bullets v4 soft10 the penetration of the ,enfield was found to be equal to that of the ,whitworth2 the same number of elm deals being perforated4 ,this proves what may be done by 8mechanical dodges10 and how intimately acquainted those in charge of 8gunnery experiments0 ought to be with all its ramifications1 or they1 too1 may be hoodwinked4 ,the difficulty of loading was here more strongly exemplified than at ,hythe4 ,the deposit from the 8,government gunpowder0 became so tenacious in the 8hexagonal grooves10 that after a certain number of shots1 loading became a very difficult matter indeed2 so much so1 that ,mr4 ,whitworth considerately provided a very superior description of gunpowder1 with which the hexagonal rifle worked a little better4 ,the recoil1 too1 was of that severe kind as to leave strong recollections of its force on the minds of the reluctant operative shooters employed to carry out the experiment4 ,the entire result may be summed up1 in the mildest term1 as 8unsatisfactory40 ,the concealment of this result may be probably a considerate act on the part of the late ,government2 the parts acted by some of the members of it must be strong in the recollection of others2 and letting down quietly this very highly inflated 8wind-bag10 when it showed symptoms of collapse1 was doubtless a judicious act4 ,,chapter ,x4 ,,revolving ,,pistols4 ,revolving or repeating pistols have now become as necessary in war as the rifle4 ,the peculiarity of the contests in various parts of ,america first showed the necessity of a weapon being constructed1 the moral and destructive effects of which should be equal4 ,colonel ,colt was unquestionably the first to overcome the difficulties found to exist in the earliest productions1 and when the introduction of the revolver into ,europe became general1 and the demands for it increased1 the manufacturers were enabled1 from the commencement1 to avoid the defects which he had overcome in the course of his experience2 and thus1 their task was a lighter one than his4 ,an immense number of revolving pistols have been constructed in a very short time2 but1 like all new creations in mechanical science1 the production has been distinguished by quantity rather than quality4 ,the general adoption of these arms has been greatly impeded by the very inferior quality produced4 ,revolving pistols may be had from #ajs4 upwards2 but as to the utility of such cheap trash nothing can be said4 ,the possession of one may have a moral effect on the courage of the bearer1 and its appearance may act on the fears of the opponent1 but the danger is greatest to him who fires4 ,the complicated arrangement of all repeating fire-arms requires that they should be of the very best workmanship1 if they are to be safe and efficient weapons4 ,that they have been of the utmost use to the allied armies in the ,crimea1 and in that more desultory but treacherous struggle in the ,east1 is certain4 ,many and valuable lives have been saved by their ready application4 ,the moral effect of the revolver was amply demonstrated where one noble young soldier held his post at 8,rewah0 by the dread of his revolver alone2 the mutineers knowing well that six of them must fall before they could reach him1 and feeling that each might be one of the six1 he held his own until relief came4 ,again1 a tale is told of another gallant officer who shot five in succession1 reserving the sixth for that arch-miscreant ,nana ,sahib2 but unfortunately that sixth barrel missed fire4 ,how many thousands of lives that shot might have saved had it been successfully fired6 ,with all good1 however1 comes a certain amount of evil3 no perfect weapon has ever yet been constructed2 but this shows how desirable it is that a perfect revolver should be invented1 if possible4 ,there are but few manufacturers of revolvers who have reached any degree of eminence3 ,colt1 ,dean1 ,adams1 ,tranter1 and ,webley1 comprise nearly all the distinguished men in this country4 ,there are a multitude of second-rate makers in ,england1 ,france1 and ,belgium2 but the most celebrated makers in ,europe are those ,i have enumerated2 and in order to guide the reader as far as my knowledge will serve1 ,i will impartially point out the advantages and defects belonging to each production4 ,the construction of ,colonel ,colt's repeating pistol is1 according to his own description1 a motion got by cocking the lock and rotating the cylinders2 as described in the following quotation3-- 8,they differ from those formerly made1 principally in the greater simplicity and the better proportions of the parts of the lock and the framework4 ,important additions and improvements have been made in the loading lever and rammer for forcing the balls firmly into the cylinder1 the employment of the helical or spiral groove on the arbor on which the cylinder turns1 whose sharp edges are intended to prevent fouling by scraping off any smoke or dirt accumulating in the cylinder from the lateral fire entering the centre opening1 and the inclined plane leading to the recesses on the periphery of the cylinder1 to direct the bolt below the opposite shoulder in the recesses2 thus preventing the cylinder from being accidentally thrown too far by the sudden action of cocking4 ,the lock is now composed of five working parts1 instead of seventeen1 as formerly2 and it is obvious that if the several parts of the machinery are made proportionally strong for the work they have to do1 so is the arm rendered more efficient by the greater simplicity of the general construction4 8,in all arms having a moveable breech it is desirable to bring the barrel and cylinder as nearly in contact as possible1 in order to prevent the escape of lateral fire1 and yet to leave freedom for motion1 without friction3 this is now effected by the base pin1 on which the cylinder turns1 entering a corresponding opening in the under part of the barrel1 being there held in place by a key passing through and bearing against the back end of the slot in the barrel1 and the fore end of the slot in the base pin1 which is thus drawn up to the bottom of the hole1 and yet the barrel is prevented from being brought too close upon1 or in absolute contact with1 the cylinder1 whilst its end is still held in its proper position with respect to the cylinder4 ,in the event of any abrasion of the end of the cylinder or of the barrel1 by deepening the cavity1 or filing the end of the base pin1 the key can be driven further in1 and the proper distance for the readjustment of those parts be maintained1 whilst the essential rigidity of structure is secured4 8,in loading the present arm1 it is necessary to draw back the hammer to the half notch1 to allow the cylinder to be rotated freely by hand2 a charge of powder is then placed in each chamber1 and the balls1 without wadding or patch1 are put one at a time upon the mouths of the chambers1 turned under the rammer and forced down1 by the lever1 below the mouth of the chamber4 ,this is repeated until all the chambers are loaded4 ,percussion caps are then placed on the nipples1 when1 by drawing back the hammer to the full catch1 the click or lever is brought into contact with one of the ratchet teeth1 on the base of the cylinder1 bringing the nipple into the precise position to receive the blow of the hammer3 the arm is then in a condition for being discharged by simply pulling the trigger2 and a repetition of the same portion produces the like results1 until all the chambers are discharged through the barrel4 8,the movements of the revolving chamber and hammer are admirably provided for4 ,the breach1 containing six cylindrical cells for holding the powder and ball1 moves one-sixth of a revolution at a time2 it can1 therefore1 only be fired when the chamber and the barrel are in a direct line4 ,the base of the cylindrical breech being cut externally into a circular ratchet of six teeth 7the lever which moves the ratchet being attached to the hammer71 as the hammer is raised in the act of cocking1 the cylinder is made to revolve1 and to revolve in one direction only4 ,while the hammer is falling1 the chamber is firmly held in its position by a lever fitted for the purpose2 when the hammer is raised1 the lever is removed and the chamber released4 8,so long as the hammer remains at half-cock the chamber is free1 and can be loaded at pleasure4 ,the rapidity with which these arms can be loaded is one of their great recommendations1 the powder being merely poured into each receptacle in succession1 and the balls being then dropped in upon it1 without any wadding1 and driven home by the ramrod1 which of course is never required to enter the barrel4 8,while carried in the pocket1 or belt1 there is no possibility of an accidental discharge of these pistols4 ,whenever it is required to clean the barrel and chamber1 they can be taken to pieces in a moment1 wiped out1 oiled1 and replaced4 8,the hammer at full-cock forms the sight by which aim is taken4 ,the pistol is readily cocked by the thumb of the right hand1 a plan in every way far superior to the arrangement whereby the hammer is raised by a pull on the trigger3 this is in every respect most objectionable1 the pull materially interfering with the correctness of aim2 and the sear-spring having the duty of the main-spring to perform as well1 is apt constantly to be getting out of order4 8,the ramrod attached to these pistols consists of a very clever but simple compound lever1 which1 forcing the ball effectually home1 hermetically seals the chamber containing the powder1 and by the application of a small quantity of wax to the nipple before capping1 the pistol may be immersed for hours in water without the chance of a miss-fire40 ,the great disadvantage said to be existing in this revolver is the necessity of cocking and half-cocking at every discharge2 which double action is difficult in certain positions where revolvers are of the greatest use1 as in a mele surrounded by many enemies1 where the cocking and firing by one pulling motion1 as in ,tranter's and ,dean's1 is more expeditious3 in fact1 certificates are published by officers who1 at the battle of ,inkermann1 would have been cut down had the slightest delay been necessary for cocking the pistol4 ,on the other hand1 it is said1 that no certain aim can be taken where the pulling up and sudden liberation of the mainspring discharges the pistol2 the act of discharging it destroying the aim4 ,these two points have their advocates and their objectors1 as has always been the case with new plans4 ,the mechanical construction of ,colt's pistol is effected entirely by machinery1 and on this account superiority is claimed for it2 in my opinion1 however1 the boasted benefits of machinery have never yet been realised4 ,the manufacture of guns without machinery is difficult1 but the entire use of it is unnecessary4 ,certain portions of pistol-making can never be done as they should be by machinery2 and ,i have not yet been able to discover anything in ,colt's manufacture to make me advocate the use of machinery4 ,i should not consider a pistol made by hand1 and equal to the best of ,colt's1 as well made2 a hand-made pistol ought to be much better in all respects4 ,dean and ,adams were the first makers of note who contested the palm with ,colt4 ,they thus describe their pistol3-- 8,the barrel1 the lock-frame1 and top-bar were all forged out of one piece of iron3 the chamber to contain five charges1 revolved on a centre pin1 which could be either drawn entirely1 or partially out1 as was required and was held in its position by a side spring2 the toothed ratchet was secured to the base of the chamber by two screws1 so as to admit of its being renewed1 when it was abraded by use1 and motion was given to it by a ratchet pall1 connected with the hammer1 which was lifted by pulling the trigger4 ,the hammer moved on a transverse pin1 and was pressed down on the nipple by a back spring in the stock1 being connected with it by a swivel link2 the trigger was kept in position by a horizontal bent spring1 and had attached to it the hammer-lifter and the ratchet pall2 the point of the former fell into a notch in the base of the hammer1 so that as the trigger was pulled1 the hammer was raised1 until the rounded portion of the base1 acting as a cam1 forced the lifter out of the notch1 and allowed the hammer to descend on the nipple and to explode the percussion-cap4 ,on withdrawing the finger from the trigger1 the lifter and ratchet pall descended and again slipped into the notches of the hammer and the chamber1 in readiness for repeating the operation of firing4 ,the lifter was retained in contact with the hammer1 by a small flat spring1 the upper end of which was attached to the pall1 while the lower end acted upon the lifter1 which1 in turning on its centre1 brought the lower prolongation against the spring1 below the centre1 so as to press the upper end in the proper direction1 in order that its action might be certain4 8,the rotation of the chambers was obtained by a ratchet pall1 acting on a tooth each time the trigger was pulled1 thus causing the chambers to revolve1 so far as to bring a nipple into the proper position for receiving the blow of the hammer1 and in that situation it was held by a projecting stop on the back of the trigger4 8,in order to load the chambers it was necessary that they should revolve free of the stop3 this was effected by pressing inwards another stop1 attached to a spring on the side of the lock1 which engaged the point of the hammer and prevented it from descending on the nipple1 until the chambers were loaded1 when1 on the trigger being pulled1 the side spring stop was released and resumed its original position1 leaving the weapon ready for action4 8,the bullets were cast with a small #8tang' on them1 which served to fix a wad on each2 thus no ramrod was required in loading1 the bullets being merely pressed in with the finger4 ,the aperture of the barrel was slightly expanded at the lower end to admit of the bullets entering more readily in firing4 ,the rifling of the barrel was the reverse of the ordinary system1 as it consisted of three projecting #8feathers1' or ridges1 extending the length of the tube1 leaving very wide grooves between them4 8,it would be observed1 that the cocking and firing were performed by the same action of the trigger2 therefore the rapidity of firing was proportionally great2 the arm was very light1 its construction simple1 and its action certain40 ,the defect of cocking and firing by the same action of the trigger must have been important2 for new patents were1 ,i believe1 taken to cover both plans1 and they now manufacture what is termed a double-action pistol1 which acts either by cocking with the finger1 or by the trigger1 as of old4 ,the important improvement in the durability and soundness of ,dean and ,adams's pistol over ,colt's is1 that the barrel1 the lock-frame1 and top bar1 are all forged out of one piece of iron2 thus1 the cylinders revolve in a frame which cannot undergo any displacement4 ,in ,colt's1 the barrel is supported by a crooked elbow1 rising from the centre1 or revolving pin2 its principal support consequently is some distance below the tube of the barrel1 but parallel to it3 the effect of long firing is to bend this elbow1 causing the barrel to fall or droop downward1 instead of continuing in a straight line with the chambers2 thus1 an opening between the chambers and the barrel is established1 increasing the space for lateral escape4 ,next1 though certainly not least1 is ,tranter's pistol1 of three different modes of construction4 ,the name of this manufacturer has risen higher than that of his ,london competitors2 owing1 no doubt1 in a great measure1 to the generally entertained opinion that all essential improvements in the ,english revolving pistols have arisen from the skill and untiring industry of ,mr4 ,william ,tranter4 ,whether the opinion that he originated all the improvements claimed for ,dean and ,adams's pistol is well founded or not1 ,i cannot say3 ,i only reiterate the opinion2 and ,i believe1 from the very great attention ,mr4 ,tranter has paid to the subject1 and from his great mechanical skill1 that he is quite capable of effecting these improvements4 ,any admirer of beautiful arrangements in gunnery has only to examine one of his double-trigger revolving pistols1 to be struck with the elaborate nature of his improvements4 ,i give a wood-cut of it on the next page1 and some quotations from his own description of its quality3-- 8,w4 ,tranter's patents for a double trigger1 a safety-hammer spring1 an elongated socket for the chamber1 a loading lever1 and a lubricating bullet for revolving arms1 increase the value and efficiency of these arms as defensive weapons4 ,illustration3 ,half size of the medium #ed gauge double-trigger ,revolver4 8,by means of the patent double-trigger the pistol can be held more firmly in the hand while being fired1 and only one hand is required to raise the hammer and fire the pistol4 ,a perfectly accurate and quicker aim can be taken1 and the pistol discharged at the instant desired2 the hammer can be raised again without lowering or removing the pistol from the object till the whole of the chambers are fired off4 ,the chamber is held firmly opposite the front barrel before the hammer begins to fall1 and also at the moment it is discharged2 the chamber cannot be turned away from the front barrel by the hammer at the moment it is discharged4 ,in cases of emergency the pistol can be fired with the greatest rapidity by pulling both triggers together4 ,the exploded caps do not get into the works and render the pistol useless till removed4 ,but little practice is required to enable a person to shoot with accuracy4 8,the patent safety hammer spring always acts with the hammer and trigger2 should anything accidentally lift the hammer1 the safety-spring instantly falls under it and prevents it falling upon the cap1 thereby preventing an accidental discharge4 ,the safety-spring also facilitates the loading1 by allowing the hammer to rest upon it while the chambers are being charged1 and at the same time acting as a safety-spring during the operation of loading4 ,the pistol can be carried with perfect safety when loaded1 either in the pocket or holster1 by allowing the hammer to rest upon the safety-spring4 8,by means of the patent elongating socket1 the chamber can be properly and readily adjusted to the frame of the pistol2 and as the chamber with use becomes too free1 and the strength of the shooting depreciated1 the elongating socket enables it to be readjusted as perfectly as when first made--an important consideration with these arms4 8,the patent loading lever enables the pistol to be loaded with greater facility1 and fits the lubricating bullet to the chamber so exactly that the powder cannot fail to bend up the flange of the bullet and distribute the lubrication all over the inner surface of the chamber and barrel2 it also fixes the bullet so firmly in its place in the chamber that it does not fall out with being carried in the pocket or holster1 neither does it project forward with the firing of the pistol4 8,the patent lubricating bullet1 with the lubricating composition1 effectually lubricates the inner surface of the chamber as far as the bullet enters1 also the face of the chamber where it comes in contact with the front barrel1 and the whole of the inner surface of the front barrel2 thereby preventing any deposit of lead or powder that may deform the bullet1 enabling the pistol to be loaded with the greatest ease after firing a number of shots1 and facilitating the passage of the bullet through the front barrel4 ,the accurate fitting of the bullet and the repellent properties of the lubrication completely protect the powder from exposure to wet or damp1 and effectually prevent one chamber igniting the powder in the other while being fired4 ,the pistol has been fired five hundred times in succession with the lubricating bullets without being cleaned or getting out of order1 the last fifty shots being fired with as much accuracy as the first2 the pistol could then be loaded and fired with the greatest facility1 there being no deposit which interfered either with the loading or firing4 8,w4 ,tranter has taken out another patent for improvements in fire-arms1 and having combined with those improvements some of the improvements comprised in his former patents1 recommends the above as possessing every requisite for a double-action cocking revolver40 ,these revolvers will be found to possess the following advantages3-- 8,the pistol can be used with one hand1 and fired with the greatest rapidity and facility by pulling the trigger with the fore finger only4 8,the hammer can be raised and the pistol fired as an ordinary fowling-piece4 8,the spring lock for locking the chambers enables the pistol to be carried safely1 and can be released when required by the thumb of the right hand4 8,the lock of the pistol is simple1 and not liable to derangement4 ,it can be easily taken to pieces when required1 and as easily put together again4 8,the patent elongating socket is combined with this revolver in the same manner as with the patent double-trigger revolver1 and with the same advantages4 ,illustration3 ,tranter's double-action ,revolver4 8,the new patent loading lever is attached to this revolver in the same manner and with the same advantages as to the patent double-trigger revolver40 ,webley's patent revolving pistol is an improvement upon ,colt's best pistol1 the cylinder rotating by the cocking of the lock4 ,the advantages obtained are1 an exceedingly simple construction in the rotating movement1 enabling the patentee to manufacture them at a lower price than any of the preceding makers1 and thus to produce1 what is a great desideratum1 a good and reasonable priced pistol4 ,illustration3 ,webley's ,revolver4 8,keep your powder dry0 was the old watchword3 8,take care of your ammunition0 ought to be the watchword of the present day4 ,facility of loading is no doubt to a certain extent an advantage1 but doubts exist whether breech-loading guns1 if brought to such a state of perfection as to come into general use1 would not1 from their very facility of loading1 become a serious evil4 ,the difficulty which ,commanding ,officers have to contend with in war is in restraining their men from firing too rapidly1 using two shots where one would suffice2 but the process of loading inculcates care of it1 takes considerable trouble1 and hence men husband their fire the more4 ,the two different principles of revolvers illustrate this4 ,the self-acting one is apt to be fired more than once2 a man in a state of excitement may pull twice before he pauses1 and two shots are expended where one would have sufficed4 ,the cocking-lock pistol1 in addition to the less pull required in firing1 gives time for observation1 as the necessity for cocking every time creates a pause1 and is an admonition to coolness3 this is often very advantageous in shooting game1 in which1 as in the more serious affair of shooting men1 deliberate coolness is required4 ,therefore1 excepting only the chance--the very remote chance1 that may arise1 requiring you to fire six shots as rapidly as possible--so rapidly that the cocking pistol would be too slow1 ,i would myself prefer the cocking pistol2 from the fact of being able to take much better aim with it1 and there being less chance of missing1 through the heavy pull necessary to raise the cock and fire the pistol on the self-acting principle4 ,the almost general adoption1 in the present day1 of the cocking-lock1 and its application in both ,adams's and ,tranter's self-acting principles1 is proof of the general bias towards the same opinion4 ,the tendency of all revolving pistols1 and of course revolving rifles also1 to foul in the barrel after a few shots1 is a very serious drawback to their efficiency in use4 ,the following quotation from ,lieutenant ,symons' work is one opinion which ,i select from a number in my possession3-- 8,revolving pistols only ought now-a-days1 in my opinion1 to be made breech-loading2 and of these the pistol of ,colonel ,colt is a very good specimen4 ,i can generally hit a target the size of a man with this pistol at a distance of #aej yards when clean1 i4 e41 with the first shot2 and ,i on one occasion put five out of the six shots into the target successively4 ,when foul1 however1 the bullets will not fly steadily and on their points4 ,i one day1 for the purpose of experiment1 fired #fj rounds without cleaning1 at planks placed a few yards off only1 when latterly the bullets1 instead of cutting the circular holes they had been doing1 commenced to make marks in the planks as if nails an inch long had struck them sideways4 ,on taking off the barrel to ascertain the cause1 ,i found that it was nearly choked up with lead4 ,the barrel of this pistol rapidly fouls1 though the chambers do not40 ,it also furnishes a complete answer to the absurd proposition of imparting spiral motion to a bullet1 by means of an increasing spiral1 after it is put into high velocity4 ,the fouling of the barrel by lead to an extent 7as ,i have seen7 of a considerable portion of the bore1 is absolute proof that the bullet does not follow the course of the grooving3 in its passage through the directing barrel it passes straight out1 with the velocity imparted to it in the chamber4 ,the experience of this fact induced ,mr4 ,tranter to invent his lubricating bullet1 the only form of pistol with which many shots can be fired without cleaning4 ,there are1 in reality1 many defects to be overcome 7though it is very doubtful whether they will ever be7 before revolvers can in any degree be relied upon for constant operations4 ,i know for a fact that at this moment ,government have in store many thousands1 disabled for all useful purposes1 though by the most trivial circumstances2 fouling with lead being one of the most prominent defects1 or some trifling disarrangement of the rotating machinery1 such as it might be supposed could be repaired3 but they are returned to store as hopeless1 in the usual course1 and thus their fate is sealed as a military weapon4 ,the double-barrelled under-and-over pistol was entirely discarded for the new toy2 but hopes are entertained that the former will soon be restored to the lost preference of all who value their own safety1 and would rather depend on two certainly destructive shots than six uncertain ones4 ,for my own personal use in any scene of combat1 my reliance would be on a pair of double-barrelled pistols2 or what is of more use still1 on double carbines4 ,the ,emperor of the ,french1 however1 is arming his sailors with revolving pistols2 and lately1 in ,india1 a squadron of ,dragoons used the revolver with deadly effect on a body of rebel ,sepoys4 ,,chapter ,,xi4 ,,enfield ,,machine-,,made ,,rifles4 ,enfield1 the seat of the ,government manufacture of small arms1 will become a celebrated place in future history2 its productions being now one of the wonders of the present age4 ,the term 8,enfield ,rifle0 does not denote any one improvement1 but a series of improvements2 ,enfield being merely the name of the place where the manufactory is situated4 ,the ,enfield rifle differs from the original rifled musket 7better known as the ,mini musket7 in the fact of the bore having been reduced to #egg1 and the weight of the arm to #i lbs4 ,the regulation ,mini musket was #aj lbs4 #h-c_/d oz4 in weight1 so that a saving of #a-a_/b lbs4 has been effected by the adoption of the present gun4 ,the size of the bore was #gjb1 and the weight of the bullet #fhj grains1 whilst the present regulation musket is only #egg bore1 the bullet being #ebj grains in weight4 ,the model arms ordered by ,lord ,hardinge1 the ,commander-in-,chief1 in #aheb1 of ,messrs4 ,greener1 ,purday1 ,richards1 ,lancaster1 and ,wilkinson1 formed the base from which the ,enfield was constructed4 ,the 8,sight0 was ,westley ,richards' invention4 ,the ,expanding ,bands for securing the stock and barrels 7without which a machine-made musket would always be an uncertainty7 are an invention of mine2 several other points were also adopted on my recommendation3 as1 for instance1 the furniture being case-hardened1 as in the rifle-corps gun1 and the fastenings of the bayonet4 ,these points1 however1 being merely suggested improvements1 and not1 strictly speaking1 inventions1 conferred no benefit on me beyond the compliment involved in their adoption4 ,it is well known that1 but for my evidence before a committee of the ,house of ,commons in #ahdh1 the swivel-lock would not have been so soon adopted as it was4 ,thus it is evident that much of the outer form1 as well as the principle1 of the present arm is due to my exertions4 ,much surprise was shown by the ,select ,committee in #aheb that ,i did not give in for trial some improvement upon my own principle 7which1 by the by1 they had not at that time admitted72 but prudence taught me otherwise3 to have done so would have affected the soundness of my claims4 ,about the year #ahea it was determined to adopt some portion of the ,american system of manufacturing guns by the aid of machinery4 ,a commission was appointed and sent out to the ,united ,states in order to inspect the operations of their mechanism1 and to ascertain the advisability of adopting the whole1 or a portion1 of their machinery in ,england4 ,to the selection of the members of that commission1 and to their judgment1 may be ascribed whatever is ill or good in the system2 the majority being military men connected with military matters1 and the others machinists1 the bias was no doubt in favour of machinery4 ,the ,enfield manufactory1 at its starting1 was intended to be a moderate affair1 ,i believe2 but now it has expanded into such gigantic proportions that1 if it continues in action1 the manufacture of military arms must partially cease to be the trade of ,birmingham3 for all large establishments of machinery must be employed1 to protect them from decay2 and whatever may be the cost of production1 machinery must go on1 or be entirely given up4 ,the extent of the ,enfield manufactory may be estimated from the fact that it now produces weekly #a1ajj stand of arms complete1 and employs men and boys to the number of #a1cjj4 ,at this rate of production1 a very few years will suffice to place such a stock of arms at the command of the ,government as will render the employment of foreign artisans unnecessary4 ,enfield machine-made arms are undoubtedly specimens of the highest class of that description2 but whether they will be found as durable as hand-made arms ,i very much doubt3 time alone can decide this4 ,,chapter ,,xii4 ,,the ,,harpoon ,,gun4 ,whale shooting has now become a great fact2 no other means being used to capture this monster of the deep but the harpoon gun1 when it is possible to obtain it4 ,although little doubt remains but that whales1 like 8grouse10 are becoming scarce1 and that in a short time they will become almost extinct1 yet their great value when captured will always stimulate hardy and daring seamen to pursue them even into their remotest haunts4 ,the following cut represents the boat and gun now in use4 ,illustration ,experience has proved the value of this invention2 and every ship that goes to the fishing has now a full complement of six harpoon guns4 ,nine-tenths of the fish got within the last few years have been shot4 ,from a calculation ,i made after the conclusion of a late season1 the result must have been very satisfactory and profitable to the owners of the ships1 and also to the gun-makers4 ,i have every reason to know that the amount of money realised by these harpoon guns amounted to little short of #ajj1jjjl42 and this from guns of my manufacture alone3 for ,i1 like most inventors1 have competitors1 who manufacture upon my model and at less than my price4 ,harpoon guns are similar to small swivel guns2 they are of #a-a_/b inch bore and #c feet long in the barrel1 which when stocked and complete weighs #ge lbs4 ,the construction of the lock is very simple1 being upon the principle of a saddle pistol lock2 the caps1 the nipples1 and lock1 are completely and effectually covered1 and protected from damp1 or spray from the sea4 ,the lock is also securely bolted until the moment it is wanted2 when by the removal of a pin1 the trigger string is pulled1 which fires the gun4 ,the harpoon is projected with considerable accuracy to any distance under eighty-four yards2 that being the greatest range ever obtained with this description of gun4 ,the charge is very small to project #dj lbs4 weight2 for the harpoon itself is #aj-a_/b lbs41 with an increasing weight of three-inch line from the gun to the extreme range1 in all weighing full #dj lbs4 ,this immense improvement is the result of calculations1 deduced from the nature of gunpowder4 ,the charge is short of an ounce of powder2 but is1 or ought to be1 good powder1 of the largest grain2 fine powder will not do it1 but1 on the contrary1 would jump up the end of the harpoon1 or bend it1 so that it would be of no further use until repaired4 ,,chapter ,,xiii4 ,,on ,,shot1 ,,caps1 ,,and ,,wadding4 ,patent shot being still produced as at the time of publishing previous editions of my works1 ,i have no important improvement to record4 ,illustration ,the manufacture is very simple3 the lead is first tempered by the aid of arsenic1 in the proportions required by the slag 7a technical term7 for the kind used2 some lead taking more and some less4 ,the melted metal is then poured into a perforated pan placed over the mouth of the pit1 or tower 7whichever may be in use47 ,messrs4 ,walkers1 ,parkers1 and ,co4 have towers in their various factories where they make shot2 the cut represents the one in ,newcastle4 ,messrs4 ,locke1 ,blackett1 and ,co4 cast down the shaft of a pit1 and by this means obtain a greater fall4 ,the fluid metal takes a globular shape in falling1 and the concentric motion of each particle round its axis keeps it in this form until its passage through the air has extracted the heat1 and before it reaches the body of water placed to receive it4 ,the only difficulty is in casting very large sizes2 for if the distance the drops fall be not sufficiently great1 and they reach the water in a semi-fluid state1 the resistance of the water misshapes them4 ,about three different sizes come out through one pan4 ,these are separated by the aid of riddles1 or tabled1 as the process is termed4 ,a quantity of the shot is placed on a slight incline1 when those that do not run off are rejected4 ,the whole are then polished in a machine termed a drum1 with a mixture of black lead4 ,this gives to the shot that beautiful polish which captivates the eye1 but which injures the shooting of the gun1 as the black lead adheres to the interior of the tube4 ,all shot should be used unpolished2 and the addition of hardness is unquestionably another advantage4 ,slag-lead is lighter than other lead1 but it is much harder1 and thus more suitable for shot4 ,i regret the disuse of shot made with quicksilver1 as it is unquestionably much superior1 though more costly4 ,a considerable improvement is yet to be introduced in the manipulation of shot-making2 and ,i shall commence a round of experiments with that object at the earliest opportunity4 ,copper caps are now a misnomer3 very few are to be met with4 ,brass caps boiled to the colour of copper are the rule1 the former the exception4 ,good caps are made in ,birmingham1 if a remunerative price is paid for them2 and ,i have the pleasure to name several makers3 ,messrs4 ,e4 and ,a4 ,ludlow1 ,messrs4 ,pursall and ,philips1 and ,mr4 ,cox4 ,it must be borne in mind that cheapness means inferiority3 every article is made according to price4 ,the mixture of fulminating mercury composition is3 ,fulminating mercury #c grains or ounces4 ,chlorate of potash #e do4 ,sulphur #a do4 ,powdered glass #a do4 ,the above is one of the best compounds in use4 ,chlorate of ,potash #f grains or ounces4 ,sulphur #c do4 ,glass1 powdered #a do4 ,charcoal1 ditto #a_/b do4 ,is the best mixture where the corrosive principle is not heeded4 ,messrs4 ,eley1 ,brothers1 were the first manufacturers who turned their attention to making waterproof copper caps for sporting purposes1 commencing it in #ahcg4 ,the principle is simple1 the excellence mainly consisting in the quality of the ingredients used1 and their being thoroughly secured from the effects of moisture4 ,they are so constituted that the largest portion of the percussion powder and the weakest part of the waterproof covering which lines the inner surface of the cap1 are immediately over the surface of the nipple2 consequently1 when the blow ignites the percussion powder1 the larger portion of the explosion is forced down the nipple1 and is of such intensity of heat 7especially in platina-lined nipples7 that it will ignite the gunpowder some distance up the barrel3 in an eprouvette it will do so at four or five inches from the nipple4 ,a miss-fire thus very seldom occurs1 as the heat is sure to penetrate to the charge1 even when a gun has become foul after a long day's shooting and the powder cannot pass freely through the chambers to the nipples4 ,it is well known that caps which do not possess these igniting qualities may be fired through gunpowder1 and frequently fail to ignite it1 from the want of proper attention to the constitution of the fulminate and its mixture4 ,in all cheaply manufactured caps this inferiority is sure to prevail1 and the manifold advantages to be derived from the sterling quality of all sporting adjuncts is now fully appreciated by sportsmen generally4 8,penny wise and pound foolish0 is a proverb more borne in mind than formerly1 and the conviction is now general that a good gun only proves to be so when proper attention is paid to the loading in every particular4 ,good wadding is as essential as good gunpowder3 a perfect separation must be maintained between the exploded powder and the shot1 or no result can be depended upon2 cheap wadding1 therefore1 according to the above adage1 is out of favour4 ,cartridges of wire1 or 8universal10 are now so well known as to need no treatise to point out their advantages4 ,a more striking example of the progress of knowledge in properly estimating the value of high-class manufactures cannot be adduced than in the case of ,eley1 ,brothers1 who have by unwearied industry in the production of sporting ammunition of the first quality1 nearly obtained a monopoly in that department of gunnery4 ,i can safely refer to the ,manufacturers to be found in the advertising list as able to supply the sportsman with all requisites1 from a gun 8to a turnscrew10 and on such terms as will be found to be advantageous to the purchaser4 ,,finis4 ,,london3 ,,printed ,,by ,,smith1 ,,elder ,,and ,,co4 ,,little ,,green ,,arbour ,,court4 ,advertisements4 ,,william ,,greener1 ,,gun ,,manufacturer1 ,,aston ,,new ,,town1 ,,birmingham1 ,,highest ,,prize ,,medallist ,,in #ahea1 #ahec1 ,,and #ahee1 ,in returning thanks to the ,sporting ,world for their distinguished support during many years1 begs to intimate to them that he has now accomplished the long cherished wish of establishing his manufactory in ,birmingham1 the seat of the gun manufacture1 where the facilities of producing a first-rate gun are superior to any other locality in the world2 for here he can reject imperfect materials and replace them1 while makers in other parts of the kingdom would be writing about the deficiency4 ,here he can exercise his own judgment on the goodness of material during the progress of production2 here he can carry out any alteration or improvement in barrels or locks that may suggest itself2 and here eventually will settle the whole manufacture for the kingdom4 ,this is nearly accomplished now1 for it would be idle to conceal the fact that a vast majority of what is sold in ,london1 as ,london make1 is made here4 ,here the best workmen are congregating and meet with the greatest encouragement4 ,under these circumstances he has judged it best to avail himself of the means offered of producing1 without 8egotism10 guns equal1 if not superior1 to anything yet produced by any maker whatever4 ,this may be considered a wide assertion1 but to prove he does not make it rashly he is prepared to test the fact by a competition with any maker whatever1 barring none2 to be decided by the following five points3 #ast1 safety--the greatest difficulty in bursting2 #bndly1 lightness2 #crdly1 goodness of shooting--strength and closeness combined with the least charges2 #dthly1 durability2 #ethly1 beauty and taste combined4 ,he considers it a crime of great magnitude that guns should burst2 they never do so where proper metal is used4 ,he will produce an ordinary weight of barrel which he will allow any one to burst if they can2 in fact1 he believes it to be the greatest difficulty to do so4 ,w4 ,g4 will undertake contracts for quantities of arms subject to private arrangement1 such as military arms1 shipping ditto1 rifles or sealing guns1 for foreign powers or private companies1 provided in all cases the quality be sufficiently good to enable him to brand them with his name2 anything inferior he declines to make4 99 99 99 99 99 ,the prices of his guns are as under3-- ,double rifles of every superior quality of taste and s4 d4 finish1 case complete with every requisite #dj #j #j ,double guns of very superior quality1 with laminated steel barrels1 c41 case and every requisite complete #ce #j #j ,double rifle1 second quality1 same material1 but not so highly finished1 case complete #cj #j #j ,double gun1 second quality1 same material1 but not so highly finished1 case complete #be #j #j ,double rifle1 excellent quality1 stubs ,damascus1 no case #ah #j #j ,double gun1 excellent quality1 laminated steel1 no case #ae #j #j ,double rifle1 good #aj #aj #j ,double gun1 good #h #aj #j ,double rifle1 no engraving1 c4 #h #j #j ,double gun1 ditto #f #j #j ,very best single rifles1 superior style and finish1 case complete #ba #j #j ,second quality1 case #af #af #j ,good quality1 no case #aj #aj #j ,plain1 ditto #e #j #j ,sealing rifles #c #aj #j ,very best single gun1 case complete #af #af #j ,second quality1 with case #ab #ab #j ,good quality #g #j #j ,plain1 ditto #d #j #j ,sealing or other guns in quantity #c #j #j ,enfield musket percussion1 swivel locks #b #j #j ,enfield rifle1 plain ditto #a #e #j ,the above includes every size which can be fired from the shoulder4 ,pistols1 ,cutlasses1 ,pikes1 c41 supplied on the most moderate ,terms4 ,business done for cash on delivery only4 ,foreign ,bills for orders payable in ,london1 or reference for payment in any part of ,england4 ,n4,b4--,w4 ,g4 now manufactures a very superior double waterproof copper and iron cap4 ,,schuyler1 ,,hartly1 ,,graham4 ,,maiden ,,lane1 ,,new ,,york1 ,,sole ,,agents ,,in ,,the ,,united ,,states ,,of ,,america ,,to ,,william ,,greener1 ,,gun ,,manufacturer1 ,,aston ,,new ,,town1 ,,birmingham4 ,every description of ,sporting ,guns imported on reasonable ,terms4 ,,powder ,,flasks1 ,,shot ,,pouches1 ,,washing ,,rods1 ,,and ,,implements ,,of ,,every ,,description ,,requisite ,,for ,,the ,,sporting ,,field4 ,,eley',s ,,caps ,,and ,,waddings1 ,,patent ,,cartridges4 ,,starkey',s1 ,,pursall ,,and ,,phillips',s1 ,e4 ,,and ,e4 ,,ludlow',s1 ,,and ,,other ,,manufacturers' ,,copper ,,caps4 ,e4 ,,baylis ,,and ,,son1 ,manufacturers of ,,every ,,description ,,of ,,military ,,and ,,sporting ,,implements1 ,,dog-,,collars1 ,,handcuffs ,,and ,,leg-,,irons4 ,contractors to the ,honourable ,board of ,ordnance4 ,,st4 ,,mary',s ,,square1 ,,birmingham4 ,,thomas ,,derrington ,,and ,,son1 ,dealers in ,,gun ,,and ,,pistol ,,stocks1 ,,wholesale ,,and ,,retail4 ,a large quantity of fine well-seasoned ,gun-stocks always on hand4 ,,walnut ,,trees1 ,,walnut ,,planks1 ,,or ,,stocks1 ,,bought4 ,,reed',s ,,buildings1 ,,shadwell-,,street1 ,,birmingham4 ,,philip ,,webley1 #hd1 ,,weaman ,,street1 ,,birmingham1 ,,present ,,contractor ,,to ,,the ,,hon4 ,,board ,,of ,,ordnance1 ,,patentee ,,of ,,safety ,,revolving ,,pistols4 ,illustration ,p4 ,,webley respectfully informs the public1 that he is prepared to supply in any quantity his ,,patent ,,revolving ,,pistols1 which he can confidently recommend1 as they embrace all latest improvements with the greatest possible simplicity of construction1 and are pronounced by men of experience1 both civil and military1 to be most efficient weapons4 ,the action is very similar to the ordinary gun lock2 the thumb being used to bring the hammer to cock1 while the arm is extended2 the chamber at the same time revolving and firmly locked at the moment of discharge1 by a spring underneath1 thus obviating the objection to other ,patent ,pistols1 which are self-acting4 7,large size #dh1 middle #fj1 small #abj bores74 ,p4 ,w4 also manufactures ,officers' ,double1 ,under and ,over1 ,breast and ,single ,pistols4 ,p4 ,w4 particularly invites attention to his ,under and ,over ,pistols1 which are rifled and made to suit the present ,government size cartridge4 ,p4 ,w4 also manufactures every description of ,revolving1 ,saloon1 ,holster1 ,pocket1 ,inlaid and ,fancy ,pistols4 ,,bullet ,,moulds of every description1 ,greenerian1 ,minie1 ,pritchett1 ,whitworth1 ,jacob1 ,cone1 ,spherical1 c4 ,rifle sights1 both military and burden4 ,rifle strap1 ,furniture1 ,gunlocks1 and all other ,implements4 ,,present ,,contractor ,,to ,,the ,,honourable ,,board ,,of ,,ordnance4 ,,percussion ,,caps4 ,e4 ,,and ,a4 ,,ludlow1 ,,military ,,percussion ,,cap ,,makers1 ,,and ,,present ,,government ,,contractors1 ,manufacturers of the ,patent ,double ,waterproof ,central ,fire and ,anticorrosive ,caps2 ,chemically prepared edged ,gun ,wadding2 ,cartridges of every description4 ,inventor and sole ,manufacturer of the ,improved ,flanged 7or ,hat7 ,caps1 as adopted by all the leading sportsmen of the day1 and acknowledged by all to be the best and most ready primer ever introduced4 ,samples with ,price ,list may be obtained at the ,works4 #gb ,,and #gc ,,legge ,,street1 ,,birmingham4 ,,joseph ,,bourne1 7,,contractor ,,to ,h4 ,m4',s ,,war ,,department17 ,manufacturer of ,guns1 ,muskets1 ,revolvers1 ,pistols1 ,rifles1 and ,small ,arms suitable for the various markets and ,governments of the world4 ,no4 #e1 ,,whittall ,,street1 ,,birmingham4 ,,by ,,her ,,majesty',s ,,royal ,,letters ,,patent4 ,,moore ,,and ,,harris1 ,,improved ,,fowling ,,and ,,rifle ,,gun1 ,,and ,,pistol ,,makers1 ,,st4 ,,mary',s ,,square1 ,,birmingham4 ,improved ,breech-,loading ,guns1 ,repeating ,arms1 and every approved article in the above line4 ,,by ,,her ,,majesty',s ,,royal ,,letters ,,patent4 ,,pursall1 ,,phillips ,,and ,,son1 ,,manufacturers ,,of ,t4 ,,starkey ,,and ,,co4',s ,,central ,,fire ,,water-,,proof ,,safety ,,cap1 ,,contractors ,,to ,h4 ,m4',s ,,hon4 ,,board ,,of ,,ordnance1 ,,and ,,to ,,the ,,hon4 ,,east ,,india ,,company4 ,,manufacturers ,,of ,,percussion1 ,,imperial1 ,,and ,,anticorrosive ,,copper ,,caps ,,tubes4 ,primers1 ,cartridges1 c41 of every description1 ,chemically ,prepared1 and other ,gun ,waddings4 #bb1 ,,whittall ,,street1 ,,st4 ,,mary',s ,,square1 ,,birmingham4 ,,pigou ,,and ,,wilks1 ,,gunpowder ,,manufacturers1 ,,dartford ,,and ,,london4 ,,charles ,,lawrence ,,and ,,son1 ,,gunpowder ,,manufacturers1 ,,battle ,,and ,,london4 ,,john ,,hall ,,and ,,son1 ,,gunpowder ,,manufacturers1 ,,faversham ,,mills ,,and ,,london4 ,,curtis ,,and ,,hervey1 ,,gunpowder ,,manufacturers1 ,,hounslow ,,mills ,,and ,,london4 ,,the ,,prize ,,medal ,,awarded ,,to ,,joseph ,,brazier ,,and ,,son1 ,,the ,,ashes ,,works1 ,,wolverhampton1 ,manufacturers of ,gun ,locks of the very best description for the ,london and ,scotch trades2 ,shot ,pouches1 ,gun ,implements1 c4 c4 ,patentees of ,improved ,revolving ,pistols1 c4 ,,rifle ,,maker ,,to ,,the ,,war ,,department4 ,,william ,,tranter1 ,,inventor1 ,,patentee1 ,,and ,,manufacturer ,,of ,,the ,,double-,,trigger ,,safety ,,revolvers1 ,,double ,,action ,,cocking ,,revolvers1 ,,revolving ,,chamber ,,rifles ,,and ,,carbines1 ,,oscillating ,,breech-,,loading ,,rifles1 ,,lubricating ,,bullets1 c4 ,illustration3 ,,double ,,trigger ,,revolver4 #ac1 ,,st4 ,,mary',s ,,square1 ,,birmingham4 ,,james ,,townsend1 #aa #ab1 ,,sand ,,street1 ,,st4 ,,mary',s ,,square1 ,,birmingham4 ,,manufacturer ,,of ,,air ,,canes1 ,,air ,,guns1 ,,and ,,air ,,weapons ,of every description1 upon an improved construction1 adapted for numerous ,sports and ,amusements1 viz4--,killing ,rabbits1 ,rooks1 ,sea ,fowl1 c41 with ball1 destroying vermin1 small birds1 and collecting rare specimens with shot1 and fish near the surface of the water with harpoons and lines4 ,,also1 ,manufacturer of ,powder1 ,walking-,stick ,guns1 ,rifles of every variety1 ,saloon ,pistols1 ,bulleted ,caps1 ,needle ,rifles1 c41 c4 ,n4,b4--,agents for the ,london ,armoury ,company for the sale of ,,adams' ,,patent ,,revolver ,,pistols4 ,and likewise ,agent for ,,colonel ,,colt',s ,,patent ,,revolver ,,pistol4 ,,an ,,assortment ,,of ,,each ,,always ,,kept ,,in ,,stock4 ,w4 ,r4 ,,pape4 ,,gun ,,and ,,rifle ,,maker1 #dd1 ,,westgate ,,street1 ,,newcastle-,,on-,,tyne4 ,possesses the highest practical knowledge of what a ,gun ought to be for general sporting purposes1 and the fact of submitting every ,gun to the severest tests1 before being finally finished1 gives him every confidence in stating1 that for shooting powers and other good qualities1 his guns cannot be excelled by any maker whatever2 for proof of which1 see the amount of shooting at ,ashburnham ,park1 ,london1 on the #ith ,april #aheh1 in the ,field ,newspaper of #agth ,april1 #aheh4 ,,thomas ,,kilby ,,and ,,son1 ,,gun ,,barrel ,,manufacturers1 #aa1 ,,court1 ,,steelhouse ,,lane1 ,,birmingham4 ,every description of ,double and ,single ,barrels1 ,rifle and ,revolving ,pistol ,barrels1 warranted equal to those of any other ,manufacturer of the day4 ,,country ,,orders ,,punctually ,,attended ,,to4 ,,eley',s ,,ammunition4 ,,eley ,,brothers1 ,,london1 beg to call the attention of ,sportsmen to the advantages to be derived from the use of the ,wire ,cartridge1 in the pursuit of all kinds of large or small game4 ,as there are few ,sportsmen who are not in the habit of using these ,cartridges1 they are so well known as to make a description of them scarcely requisite4 ,the shot is packed within a wire cage1 which is constructed so as to allow them to escape from it gradually while the charge is in motion4 ,they cause all guns to shoot with double the strength which can be obtained by the ordinary mode of loading1 and with much greater regularity1 as each shot retains its spherical form4 ,the ,royal ,cartridge is mostly used in this country for killing wild game4 ,the ,green ,cartridge is the sort generally in demand for ,india and ,america1 being made for foreign field sports with the largest drop shot1 and also with mould shot1 and will be found very effective at large game where the ,sportsman has not a rifle in the field4 ,,eley',s ,,double ,,waterproof ,,central ,,fire ,,caps4 ,these ,caps are now well known and approved1 being found superior to all others for their certainty and rapidity of fire1 either in dry or wet weather4 ,for ,india and the ,colonies1 or any climate where ,caps may be exposed to great vicissitudes of heat1 cold1 or moisture1 they are particularly recommended1 as they cannot be injured by any amount of exposure to wet or heat1 nor their qualities impaired1 if kept for years in a tropical climate4 ,the ignition at all times is safe and certain1 whilst in humid weather1 the discharge is as instantaneous as with the ordinary ,cap on the dryest day4 ,for testimonials as to their value for shooting in ,india see ,colonel ,jacob's work on 8,rifles and ,projectiles40 ,they have been much approved for the rifle in foreign field sports1 where the ,cap is often allowed to remain a long time upon the nipple4 ,being perfectly waterproof1 they will bear immersion in sea-water for days without injury2 but when testing them in this manner1 it is necessary to blow the water out of them before placing them upon the nipple4 ,concaved ,felt1 and chemically prepared ,cloth ,gun ,waddings1 to prevent the leading of guns1 warranted not to blow to pieces in the barrel4 ,cartridges for ,breech-loading ,shot ,guns1 ,rifles1 c42 also for ,sharp's ,breech-loading ,rifles1 and ,prince's ,breech-loading ,carbines4 ,cartridges made for ,needle ,rifles1 very simple and effective in their construction4 ,skin ,cartridges1 suitable for ,adams'1 ,deane's1 and ,colt's ,revolvers--warranted to leave no deposit when fired4 ,also ,rifle ,shell ,tubes1 as manufactured by direction of ,colonel ,john ,jacob1 of the ,bombay ,artillery1 and every description of ammunition for sporting or military purposes4 ,sole ,contractors to the ,war ,department for ,waterproof ,military ,caps1 ,revolver ,cartridges1 ,jacob's ,rifle ,shell ,tubes1 c4 ,eley's ammunition may be had of all ,gunmakers and ,dealers at home or abroad4 ,,eley ,,brothers1 ,,london4 7,,wholesale ,,only47 ,,william ,,evans1 ,,thirteen ,,years ,,with ,,joseph ,,brosier ,,and ,,son1 ,,gun ,,lock ,,manufacturer1 #ae ,,bath ,,street1 ,,birmingham4 ,,charles ,,maybury1 ,,manufacturer ,,of ,,every ,,description ,,of ,,sportsman',s ,,guns1 ,,rifles1 ,,pistols1 ,,etc41 ,,revolvers ,,on 8,,tranter',s0 ,,and ,,all ,,other ,,patent ,,improved ,,principles1 ,,for ,,home ,,and ,,exportation1 #ae ,,st4 ,,mary',s ,,square1 ,,birmingham4 ,w4 ,,and ,c4 ,,scott ,,and ,,son1 ,,gun ,,and ,,pistol ,,makers1 #ie1 ,,bath ,,street1 ,,birmingham4 ,,guns ,,for ,,home ,,use ,,and ,,exportation4 #fe1 ,cornhill1 ,london1 ,september1 #aheh4 ,,new ,,and ,,standard ,,works ,,published ,,by ,,smith1 ,,elder ,co4 ,,works ,,in ,,the ,,press4 ,social ,innovators and their ,schemes4 ,by ,,william ,,lucas ,,sargant1 ,author of 8,the ,science of ,social ,opulence10 c4 ,post #hvo4 ,indian ,scenes and ,characters1 ,sketched from ,life4 ,by ,prince ,,alexis ,,soltykoff4 ,sixteen ,plates in ,tinted ,lithography1 with ,descriptions4 ,colombier ,folio4 7,nearly ,ready47 ,christianity in ,india4 ,by ,,john ,,william ,,kaye1 ,author of 8,life of ,lord ,metcalfe10 c4 #hvo4 7,in the ,press47 ,lectures and ,addresses on ,literary and ,social ,topics4 ,by the late ,rev4 ,,fred4 ,w4 ,,robertson1 of ,brighton4 ,post #hvo4 7,just ,ready47 ,tents and ,tent ,life4 ,by ,capt4 ,,godfrey ,,rhodes1 #idth ,regt4 ,post #hvo41 with ,twenty-eight ,plates1 #abs4 cloth4 ,the ,life of ,j4 ,deacon ,hume1 ,esq41 late ,secretary to the ,board of ,trade4 ,by the ,rev4 ,,charles ,,badham4 ,post #hvo4 ,phantastes3 a ,faerie ,romance for ,men and ,women4 ,by ,,george ,,macdonald1 ,author of 8,within and ,without40 ,post #hvo4 ,historic ,notes on the ,old and ,new ,testament4 ,by ,,samuel ,,sharpe1 ,esq4 ,new and ,revised ,edition4 ,post #hvo4 ,the ,parents' ,cabinet of ,amusement and ,instruction1 for ,young ,persons4 ,a ,new and ,revised ,edition4 ,in ,shilling ,volumes1 ,post #hvo41 with a ,frontispiece printed in ,oil ,colours1 and numerous ,woodcuts1 in a handsome ,illustrated ,binding4 ,,volume ,i4 ,,will ,,be ,,published ,,on ,,the #a,,st ,,of ,,december4 ,,new ,,publications4 ,,cheaper ,,edition4 ,the ,life of ,charlotte ,bront4 7,,currer ,,bell47 ,author of 8,,jane ,,eyre10 8,,shirley10 8,,villette10 c4 ,by ,,mrs4 ,,gaskell1 ,author of 8,north and ,south10 c4 ,fourth ,edition1 ,revised1 ,one ,volume1 with a ,portrait of ,miss ,bront and a ,view of ,haworth ,parsonage4 ,price #gs4 #f;d4 8,all the secrets of the literary workmanship of the authoress of #8,jane ,eyre' are unfolded in the course of this extraordinary narrative40--,times4 8,mrs4 ,gaskell has produced one of the best biographies of a woman by a woman which we can recall to mind40--,athenum4 ,gunnery in #aheh3 being a ,treatise on ,rifles1 ,cannon1 and ,sporting ,arms4 ,by ,,william ,,greener1 ,author of 8,the ,gun40 ,demy #hvo41 with ,illustrations1 price #ads41 cloth4 ,personal ,adventures during the ,indian ,rebellion1 in ,rohilcund1 ,futteghur1 and ,oude4 ,by ,w4 ,,edwards1 ,esq41 ,b4,c4,s4 ,post #hvo41 price #fs4 cloth4 8,for touching incidents1 hair-breadth #8scapes1 and the pathos of sufferings almost incredible1 there has appeared nothing like this little book of #8,personal ,adventures4'0--,athenum4 8,among the stories of hair-breadth escapes in ,india this is one of the most interesting and touching40--,examiner4 8,a very touching narrative40--,lit4 ,gazette4 8,no account of it can do it justice40--,globe4 ,the ,crisis in the ,punjab4 ,by ,,frederick ,h4 ,,cooper1 ,esq41 ,c4,s41 ,umritsir4 ,post #hvo1 with ,map1 price #gs4 #f;d4 cloth4 8,the book is full of terrible interest4 ,the narrative is written with vigour and earnestness1 and is full of the most tragic interest40--,economist4 8,one of the most interesting and spirited books which have sprung out of the sepoy mutiny40--,globe4 ,eight ,months' ,campaign against the ,bengal ,sepoys1 during the ,mutiny1 #aheg4 ,by ,colonel ,,george ,,bourchier1 ,c4,b41 ,bengal ,horse ,artillery4 ,with ,plans4 ,post #hvo1 price #gs4 #f;d4 cloth4 8,a right manly1 fair1 and forcible statement of events40--,athenum4 8,colonel ,bourchier relates his adventures in a free and graceful manner40--,literary ,gazette4 ,the ,parsees3 their ,history1 ,religion1 ,manners1 and ,customs4 ,by ,,dosabhoy ,,framjee4 ,post #hvo1 price #ajs4 cloth4 8,an acceptable addition to our literature4 ,it gives information which many will be glad to have carefully gathered together1 and formed into a shapely whole40--,economist4 ,homely ,ballads for the ,working ,man's ,fireside4 ,by ,,mary ,,sewell4 ,post #hvo1 cloth1 ,one ,shilling4 ,,new ,,publications--continued4 ,the ,chaplain's ,narrative of the ,siege of ,delhi4 ,by the ,rev4 ,j4 ,e4 ,w4 ,,rotton1 ,chaplain to the ,delhi ,field ,force4 ,post #hvo1 with a ,plan of the ,city and ,siege ,works1 price #ajs4 #f;d4 cloth4 8,a simple and touching statement1 which bears the impress of truth in every word40--,athenum4 8,an earnest record by a ,christian minister of some of the most touching scenes which can come under observation40--,literary ,gazette4 ,the ,defence of ,lucknow3 ,a ,,staff-,,officer',s ,,diary4 ,by ,capt4 ,,thos4 ,f4 ,,wilson1 #acth ,bengal ,n4 ,i41 ,assistant-,adjutant-,general4 ,sixth ,thousand4 ,with ,plan of the ,residency4 ,small post #hvo41 price #bs4 #f;d4 8,the story of the glorious garrison of ,lucknow is told in this volume with all its thrilling and painful details40--,nonconformist4 8,the #8,staff ,officer' supplies exact military information with distinctness40--,globe4 ,life and ,correspondence of ,lord ,metcalfe4 ,by ,,john ,,william ,,kaye4 ,new and ,cheap ,edition1 in #b ,vols41 ,small ,post #hvo1 with ,portrait1 price #abs4 cloth4 8,one of the most valuable biographies of the present day40--,economist4 8,an edition revised with care and judgment40--,globe4 ,narrative of the ,mission from the ,governor-,general of ,india to the ,court of ,ava in #ahee4 ,with ,notices of the ,country1 ,government1 and ,people4 ,by ,,captain ,,henry ,,yule1 ,bengal ,engineers4 ,imperial #hvo41 with #bd ,plates 7#ab coloured71 #ej ,woodcuts1 and #d ,maps4 ,elegantly bound in cloth1 with gilt edges1 price #bl4 #abs4 #f;d4 8,a stately volume in gorgeous golden covers4 ,such a book is in our times a rarity4 ,large1 massive1 and beautiful in itself1 it is illustrated by a sprinkling of elegant wood-cuts1 and by a series of admirable tinted lithographs4444 ,we have read it with curiosity and gratification1 as a fresh1 full1 and luminous report upon the condition of one of the most interesting divisions of ,asia beyond the ,ganges40--,athenum4 ,the ,education of the ,human ,race4 ,now first ,translated from the ,german of ,,lessing4 ,fcap4 #hvo1 antique cloth1 price #ds4 ,this remarkable work is now first published in ,english4 8,an agreeable and flowing translation of one of ,lessing's finest ,essays40--,national ,review4 ,the ,essay makes quite a gem in its ,english form40--,westminster ,review4 8,this invaluable ,tract40--,critic4 ,the ,autobiography of ,lutfullah1 a ,mohamedan ,gentleman1 with an ,account of his ,visit to ,england4 ,edited by ,e4 ,b4 ,,eastwick1 ,esq4 ,third ,edition1 ,small ,post #hvo4 ,price #es4 cloth4 8,we have read this book with wonder and delight40--,athenum4 8,it bears the strongest resemblance to ,gil ,blas of anything we have ever read40--,spectator4 ,the ,life and ,correspondence of ,sir ,john ,malcolm1 ,g4,c4,b4 ,by ,,john ,,william ,,kaye4 ,two ,volumes1 #hvo4 ,with ,portrait4 ,price #cfs4 cloth4 8,this book deserves to participate in the popularity which it was the good fortune of ,sir ,john ,malcolm to enjoy40--,edinburgh ,review4 8,mr4 ,kaye has used his materials well1 and has written an interesting narrative1 copiously illustrated with valuable documents40--,examiner4 ,,mr4 ,,ruskin',s ,,works ,,on ,,art4 ,notes on the ,pictures in the ,exhibition of the ,royal ,academy1 c41 for #aheh ,by ,,john ,,ruskin4 ,fifth ,thousand4 #hvo1 price ,one ,shilling4 ,the ,political ,economy of ,art4 ,price #bs4 #f;d4 cloth4 8,a most able1 eloquent1 and well-timed work4 ,we hail it with satisfaction1 thinking it calculated to do much practical good1 and we cordially recommend it to our readers40--,witness4 ,mr4 ,ruskin's chief purpose is to treat the artist's power1 and the art itself1 as items of the world's wealth1 and to show how these may be best evolved1 produced1 accumulated1 and distributed40--,athenum4 8,we never quit ,mr4 ,ruskin without being the better for what he has told us1 and we therefore recommend this little volume1 like all his other works1 to the perusal of our readers40--,economist4 8,this book1 daring1 as it is1 glances keenly at principles1 of which some are among the articles of ancient codes1 while others are evolving slowly to the light40--,leader4 ,the ,elements of ,drawing4 ,second ,edition4 ,crown #hvo4 ,with ,illustrations drawn by the ,author4 ,price #gs4 #f;d41 cloth4 8,the rules are clearly and fully laid down2 and the earlier exercises always conducive to the end by simple and unembarrassing means4 ,the whole volume is full of liveliness40--,spectator4 8,we close this book with a feeling that1 though nothing supersedes a master1 yet that no student of art should launch forth without this work as a compass40--,athenum4 8,it will be found not only an invaluable acquisition to the student1 but agreeable and instructive reading for any one who wishes to refine his perceptions of natural scenery1 and of its worthiest artistic representations40--,economist4 8,original as this treatise is1 it cannot fail to be at once instructive and suggestive40--,literary ,gazette4 8,the most useful and practical book on the subject which has ever come under our notice40--,press4 ,modern ,painters1 ,vol4 ,,iv4 ,on ,mountain ,beauty4 ,imperial #hvo1 with ,thirty-five ,illustrations engraved on ,steel1 and #aaf ,woodcuts1 drawn by the ,author4 ,price #bl4 #ajs4 cloth4 8,considered as an illustrated volume1 this is the most remarkable which ,mr4 ,ruskin has yet issued4 ,the plates and woodcuts are profuse1 and include numerous drawings of mountain form by the author1 which prove ,mr4 ,ruskin to be essentially an artist4 ,he is an unique man1 both among artists and writers40--,spectator4 8,the present volume of ,mr4 ,ruskin's elaborate work treats chiefly of mountain scenery1 and discusses at length the principles involved in the pleasure we derive from mountains and their pictorial representation4 ,the singular beauty of his style1 the hearty sympathy with all forms of natural loveliness1 the profusion of his illustrations form irresistible attractions40--,daily ,news4 ,modern ,painters1 ,vol4 ,,iii4 ,of ,many ,things4 ,with ,eighteen ,illustrations drawn by the ,author1 and engraved on ,steel4 ,price #chs4 cloth4 8,every one who cares about nature1 or poetry1 or the story of human development--every one who has a tinge of literature or philosophy1 will find something that is for him in this volume40--,westminster ,review4 8,mr4 ,ruskin is in possession of a clear and penetrating mind2 he is undeniably practical in his fundamental ideas2 full of the deepest reverence for all that appears to him beautiful and holy4 ,his style is1 as usual1 clear1 bold1 racy4 ,mr4 ,ruskin is one of the first writers of the day40--,economist4 8,the present volume1 viewed as a literary achievement1 is the highest and most striking evidence of the author's abilities that has yet been published40--,leader4 8,all1 it is to be hoped1 will read the book for themselves4 ,they will find it well worth a careful perusal40--,saturday ,review4 ,,works ,,of ,,mr4 ,,ruskin--continued4 ,modern ,painters4 ,vols4 ,i4 and ,,ii4 ,imp4 #hvo4 ,vol4 ,i41 #eth ,edit1 #ahs4 cloth4 ,vol4 ,,ii41 #dth ,edit41 #ajs4 #f;d4 cloth4 8,mr4 ,ruskin's work will send the painter more than ever to the study of nature2 will train men who have always been delighted spectators of nature1 to be also attentive observers4 ,our critics will learn to admire1 and mere admirers will learn how to criticise3 thus a public will be educated40--,blackwood's ,magazine4 8,a generous and impassioned review of the works of living painters4 ,a hearty and earnest work1 full of deep thought1 and developing great and striking truths in art40--,british ,quarterly ,review4 8,a very extraordinary and delightful book1 full of truth and goodness1 of power and beauty40--,north ,british ,review4 ,the ,stones of ,venice4 ,complete in ,three ,volumes1 ,imperial #hvo1 with ,fifty-three ,plates and numerous ,woodcuts1 drawn by the ,author4 ,price #el4 #aes4 #f;d41 cloth4 ,,each ,,volume ,,may ,,be ,,had ,,separately4 ,,vol4 ,i4 ,,the ,,foundations1 with #ba ,plates1 price #bl4 #bs4 #bnd ,ed4 ,,vol4 ,,ii4 ,,the ,,sea ,,stories1 with #bj ,plates1 price #bl4 #bs4 ,,vol4 ,,iii4 ,,the ,,fall1 with #ab ,plates1 price #al4 #aas4 #f;d4 8,this book is one which1 perhaps1 no other man could have written1 and one for which the world ought to be and will be thankful4 ,it is in the highest degree eloquent1 acute1 stimulating to thought1 and fertile in suggestion4 ,it will1 we are convinced1 elevate taste and intellect1 raise the tone of moral feeling1 kindle benevolence towards men1 and increase the love and fear of ,god40--,times4 8,the #8,stones of ,venice' is the production of an earnest1 religious1 progressive1 and informed mind4 ,the author of this essay on architecture has condensed into it a poetic apprehension1 the fruit of awe of ,god1 and delight in nature2 a knowledge1 love1 and just estimate of art2 a holding fast to fact and repudiation of hearsay2 an historic breadth1 and a fearless challenge of existing social problems1 whose union we know not where to find paralleled40--,spectator4 ,the ,seven ,lamps of ,architecture4 ,second ,edition1 with ,fourteen ,plates drawn by the ,author4 ,imperial #hvo4 ,price #al4 #as4 cloth4 8,by the #8,seven ,lamps of ,architecture1' we understand ,mr4 ,ruskin to mean the seven fundamental and cardinal laws1 the observance of and obedience to which are indispensable to the architect1 who would deserve the name4 ,the politician1 the moralist1 the divine1 will find in it ample store of instructive matter1 as well as the artist4 ,the author of this work belongs to a class of thinkers of whom we have too few amongst us40--,examiner4 8,mr4 ,ruskin's book bears so unmistakeably the marks of keen and accurate observation1 of a true and subtle judgment and refined sense of beauty1 joined with so much earnestness1 so noble a sense of the purposes and business of art1 and such a command of rich and glowing language1 that it cannot but tell powerfully in producing a more religious view of the uses of architecture1 and a deeper insight into its artistic principles40--,guardian4 ,lectures on ,architecture and ,painting4 ,with ,fourteen ,cuts1 drawn by the ,author4 ,second ,edition4 ,crown #hvo4 ,price #hs4 #f;d4 cloth4 8,mr4 ,ruskin's lectures--eloquent1 graphic1 and impassioned--exposing and ridiculing some of the vices of our present system of building1 and exciting his hearers by strong motives of duty and pleasure to attend to architecture--are very successful40--,economist4 8,we conceive it to be impossible that any intelligent persons could listen to the lectures1 however they might differ from the judgments asserted1 and from the general propositions laid down1 without an elevating influence and an aroused enthusiasm40--,spectator4 99 99 99 99 99 ,a ,portrait of ,john ,ruskin1 ,esq41 ,engraved by ,f4 ,,holl1 from a ,drawing by ,,george ,,richmond4 ,prints1 ,one ,guinea2 ,india ,proofs1 ,two ,guineas4 ,,recent ,,works4 ,sermons4 ,by the late ,,rev4 ,,fred4 ,w4 ,,robertson1 ,a4,m41 ,incumbent of ,trinity ,chapel1 ,brighton4 ,,first ,,series--,fourth ,edition1 ,post #hvo1 price #is4 cloth4 ,,second ,,series--,fourth ,edition1 price #is4 cloth4 ,,third ,,series--,second ,edition1 ,post #hvo1 with ,portrait1 price #is4 cloth4 8,very beautiful in feeling and occasionally striking and forcible in conception to a remarkable degree40--,guardian4 8,mr4 ,robertson1 of ,brighton1 is a name familiar to most of us1 and honoured by all to whom it is familiar40--,globe4 8,these sermons are full of thought and beauty4 ,there is not a sermon in the series that does not furnish evidence of originality without extravagance1 of discrimination without tediousness1 and of piety without cant or conventionalism40--,british ,quarterly4 ,esmond4 ,by ,w4 ,m4 ,,thackeray1 ,esq4 ,a ,new ,edition in ,one ,volume1 ,crown #hvo1 price #fs4 cloth4 8,mr4 ,thackeray has selected for his hero a very noble type of the cavalier softening into the man of the eighteenth century1 and for his heroine one of the sweetest women that ever breathed from canvas or from book since ,raffaelle painted and ,shakspeare wrote40--,spectator4 8,apart from its special merits 8,esmond0 must be read just now as an introduction to 8,the ,virginians40 ,it is quite impossible fully to understand and enjoy the latter story without a knowledge of 8,esmond40 ,the new tale is in the strictest sense the sequel of the old1 not only introducing the same characters1 but continuing their history at a later period40--,leader4 ,captivity of ,russian ,princesses in the ,caucasus3 including a ,seven ,months' ,residence in ,shamil's ,seraglio1 in the ,years #ahed-e4 ,translated from the ,russian1 by ,h4 ,s4 ,,edwards4 ,with an authentic ,portrait of ,shamil1 a ,plan of his ,house1 and a ,map4 ,post #hvo1 price #ajs4 #f;d4 cloth4 8,a book than which there are few novels more interesting4 ,it is a romance of the ,caucasus4 ,the account of life in the house of ,shamil is full and very entertaining2 and of ,shamil himself we see much40--,examiner4 8,the story is certainly one of the most curious we have read2 it contains the best popular notice of the social polity of ,shamil and the manners of his people40--,leader4 8,the narrative is well worth reading40--,athenum4 ,religion in ,common ,life4 ,by ,,william ,,ellis4 ,post #hvo1 price #gs4 #f;d4 cloth4 8,a book addressed to young people of the upper ten thousand upon social duties40--,examiner4 8,lessons in ,political ,economy for young people by a skilful hand40--,economist4 ,the ,sea ,officers ,manual2 being a ,compendium of the ,duties of a ,commander2 ,first1 ,second1 ,third1 and ,fourth ,officer2 ,officer of the ,watch2 and ,midshipman in the ,mercantile ,navy4 ,by ,,captain ,a4 ,,parish1 of the ,east ,india ,merchant ,service4 ,second ,edition1 ,small ,post #hvo1 price #es4 cloth4 8,a very lucid and compendious manual4 ,we would recommend youths intent upon a seafaring life to study it40--,athenum4 8,a little book that ought to be in great request among young seamen40--,examiner4 ,,recent ,,works--continued4 ,annals of ,british ,legislation1 a ,classified ,summary of ,parliamentary ,papers4 ,edited by ,,professor ,,leone ,,levi4 ,,the ,,twenty-,,fifth ,,part ,,is ,,just ,,issued4 ,antiquities of ,kertch1 and ,researches in the ,cimmerian ,bosphorus4 ,by ,,duncan ,,mcpherson1 ,m4,d4 ,imperial ,quarto1 with ,fourteen ,plates and numerous ,illustrations1 including ,eight ,coloured ,fac-,similes of ,belies of ,antique ,art1 price ,two ,guineas4 ,the ,principles of ,agriculture2 especially ,tropical4 ,by ,p4 ,,lovell ,,phillips1 ,m4,d4 ,demy #hvo1 price #gs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,westgarth's ,victoria1 and the ,australian ,gold ,mines in #aheg4 ,post #hvo1 with ,maps1 price #ajs4 #f;d41 cloth4 ,tauler's ,life and ,sermons4 ,translated by ,,miss ,,susanna ,,winkworth4 ,with a ,preface by the ,,rev4 ,,charles ,,kingsley4 ,small #dto1 ,printed on ,tinted ,paper1 and bound in antique style1 with red edges1 suitable for a ,present4 ,price #aes4 ,chandler's ,visit to ,salt ,lake2 being a ,journey ,across the ,plains to the ,mormon ,settlements at ,utah4 ,post #hvo1 with a ,map1 price #is4 cloth4 ,doubleday's ,life of ,sir ,robert ,peel4 ,two ,volumes1 #hvo1 price #ahs4 cloth4 ,cayley's ,european ,revolutions of #ahdh4 ,crown #hvo1 price #fs4 cloth4 ,bunsens 7,chevalier7 ,signs of the ,times2 or1 ,the ,dangers to ,religious ,liberty in the ,present ,day4 ,translated by ,miss ,susanna ,winkworth4 ,one ,volume1 #hvo1 price #afs4 cloth4 ,payn's ,stories and ,sketches4 ,post #hvo1 price #hs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,stoney's ,residence in ,tasmania4 ,demy #hvo1 with ,plates1 ,cuts1 and a ,map1 price #ads4 cloth4 ,the ,court of ,henry ,,viii43 being a ,selection of the ,despatches of ,,sebastian ,,giustinian1 ,venetian ,ambassador1 #aeae-aeai4 ,translated by ,,rawdon ,,brown4 ,two ,vols41 crown #hvo1 price #bas4 cloth4 ,,recent ,,works--continued4 ,forbes' 7,sir ,john7 ,sight-seeing in ,germany and the ,tyrol4 ,post #hvo1 with ,map and ,view1 price #ajs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,undine4 ,from the ,german of 8,de la ,motte ,fouqu40 ,price #as4 #f;d4 ,conolly on the ,treatment of the ,insane4 ,demy #hvo1 price #ads4 cloth4 ,hopkins's ,handbook of ,average4 #hvo1 price #abs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,morice's ,hand-,book of ,british ,maritime ,law4 #hvo1 price #es41 cloth4 ,adams's ,history and ,topography of the ,isle of ,wight4 ,quarto1 #be ,steel ,plates1 cloth1 gilt edges1 price #bl4 #bs4 ,waring's ,manual of ,therapeutics4 ,fcap4 #hvo1 price #abs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,vogel on ,disorders of the ,blood4 ,translated by ,,chunder ,,coomar ,,dey4 #hvo1 price #gs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,duncan's ,campaign with the ,turks in ,asia4 ,two ,vols41 post #hvo1 price #bas4 cloth4 ,ross's ,account of ,red ,river ,settlement4 ,one ,volume1 post #hvo1 price #ajs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,ross's ,fur ,hunters of the ,far ,west4 ,two ,volumes1 post #hvo4 ,with ,map and ,plate4 #bas4 cloth4 ,russo-,turkish ,campaigns of #ahbh-i4 ,by ,,colonel ,,chesney1 ,r4,a41 ,d4,c4,l41 ,f4,r4,s4 ,third ,edition4 ,post #hvo1 with ,maps1 price #abs4 cloth4 ,thomson's ,military ,forces and ,institutions of ,great ,britain4 #hvo1 price #aes4 cloth4 ,the ,militiaman at ,home and ,abroad4 ,with ,two ,etchings1 by ,,john ,,leech4 ,post #hvo1 price #is4 cloth4 ,levi's ,manual of the ,mercantile ,law of ,great ,britain and ,ireland4 #hvo1 price #abs4 cloth4 ,thomson's ,laws of ,war ,affecting ,commerce and ,shipping4 ,second ,edition1 greatly enlarged4 #hvo1 price #ds4 #f;d4 boards4 ,,works ,,on ,,india ,,and ,,the ,,east4 ,suggestions ,towards the ,future ,government of ,india4 ,by ,,harriet ,,martineau4 ,second ,edition4 ,demy #hvo1 price #es4 cloth4 8,the genuine1 honest utterances of a clear1 sound understanding1 neither obscured nor enfeebled by party prejudice or personal selfishness40--,daily ,news4 8,as the work of an honest able writer1 these ,suggestions are well worthy of attention1 and no doubt they will generally be duly appreciated40--,observer4 ,british ,rule in ,india4 ,by ,,harriet ,,martineau4 ,fifth ,thousand4 ,price #bs4 #f;d4 cloth4 8,a good compendium of a great subject40--,national ,review4 8,a succinct and comprehensive volume40--,leader4 ,traits and ,stories of ,anglo-,indian ,life4 ,by ,lieut4-,colonel ,,addison4 ,with ,eight ,illustrations1 price #es4 cloth4 8,a collection of amusing anecdotes40--,critic4 ,tiger ,shooting in ,india4 ,by ,,lieutenant ,,william ,,rice1 #beth ,bombay ,n4 ,i4 ,super ,royal #hvo4 ,with ,twelve ,plates in ,chroma-lithography4 #bas4 cloth4 8,these adventures1 told in handsome large print1 with spirited chromo-lithographs to illustrate them1 make the volume before us as pleasant reading as any record of sporting achievements we have ever taken in hand40--,athenum4 8,a remarkably pleasant book of adventures during several seasons of #8large game' hunting in ,rajpootana4 ,the twelve chromo-lithographs are very valuable accessories to the narrative2 they have wonderful spirit and freshness40--,globe4 ,the ,commerce of ,india with ,europe1 and its ,political ,effects4 ,by ,b4 ,a4 ,,irving1 ,esq41 ,author of 8,the ,theory and ,practice of ,caste40 ,post #hvo1 price #gs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,views and ,opinions of ,brigadier-,general ,jacob1 ,c4,b4 ,collected and ,edited by ,captain ,,lewis ,,pelly1 ,late ,political ,secretary ,persian ,expeditionary ,force4 ,demy #hvo1 price #abs4 cloth4 ,papers of the late ,lord ,metcalfe4 ,selected and ,edited by ,j4 ,w4 ,,kaye4 ,demy #hvo1 price #afs4 cloth4 ,the ,life of ,mahomet and ,history of ,islam to the ,era of the ,hegira4 ,by ,,william ,,muir1 ,esq41 ,bengal ,civil ,service4 ,two ,volumes #hvo1 price #cbs4 cloth4 ,,works ,,on ,,india ,,and ,,the ,,east--continued4 ,tracts on the ,native ,army of ,india4 ,by ,brigadier-,general ,,jacob1 ,c4,b4 #hvo1 price #bs4 #f;d4 ,rifle ,practice4 ,by ,brigadier-,general ,,jacob1 ,c4,b4 ,fourth ,edition1 #hvo1 price #bs4 ,the ,english in ,western ,india2 being the ,early ,history of the ,factory at ,surat1 of ,bombay4 ,by ,,philip ,,anderson1 ,a4,m4 ,second ,edition1 #hvo1 price #ads4 cloth4 ,life in ,ancient ,india4 ,by ,,mrs4 ,,speir4 ,with ,sixty ,illustrations by ,g4 ,,scharf4 #hvo1 price #aes41 elegantly bound in cloth1 gilt edges4 ,the ,cauvery1 ,kistnah1 and ,godavery3 being a ,report on the ,works constructed on those ,rivers1 for the ,irrigation of ,provinces in the ,presidency of ,madras4 ,by ,r4 ,,baird ,,smith1 ,f4,g4,s41 ,lt4-,col4 ,bengal ,engineers1 c41 c4 ,in demy #hvo1 with #ai ,plans1 price #bhs4 cloth4 ,the ,bhilsa ,topes2 or1 ,budhist ,monuments of ,central ,india4 ,by ,,major ,,cunningham4 ,one ,volume1 #hvo1 with ,thirty-three ,plates1 price #cjs4 cloth4 ,the ,chinese and their ,rebellions4 ,by ,,thomas ,,taylor ,,meadows4 ,one ,thick ,volume1 #hvo1 with ,maps1 price #ahs4 cloth4 ,on the ,culture and ,commerce of ,cotton in ,india4 ,by ,dr4 ,,forbes ,,royle4 #hvo1 price #ahs4 cloth4 ,the ,fibrous ,plants of ,india fitted for ,cordage1 ,clothing1 and ,paper4 ,by ,dr4 ,,forbes ,,royle4 #hvo1 price #abs4 cloth4 ,the ,productive ,resources of ,india4 ,by ,dr4 ,,forbes ,,royle4 ,super ,royal #hvo1 price #ads4 cloth4 ,royle's ,review of the ,measures adopted in ,india1 for the ,improved ,culture of ,cotton4 #hvo1 #bs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,,works ,,on ,,india ,,and ,,the ,,east--continued4 ,a ,sketch of ,assam2 with some ,account of the ,hill ,tribes4 ,coloured ,plates1 #hvo1 price #ads4 cloth4 ,butler's ,travels and ,adventures in ,assam4 ,one ,volume #hvo1 with ,plates1 price #abs4 cloth4 ,dr4 ,wilson on ,infanticide in ,western ,india4 ,demy #hvo1 price #abs4 ,rev4 ,james ,coley's ,journal of the ,sutlej ,campaign4 ,fcap4 #hvo1 price #ds4 cloth4 ,crawfurd's ,grammar and ,dictionary of the ,malay ,language4 #b vols4 #hvo1 price #cfs4 cloth4 ,roberts's ,indian ,exchange ,tables4 #hvo4 ,second ,edition1 enlarged1 price #ajs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,waring on ,abscess in the ,liver4 #hvo1 price #cs4 #f;d4 ,laurie's ,second ,burmese ,war--,rangoon4 ,post #hvo1 with ,plates1 price #ajs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,laurie's ,pegu4 ,post #hvo1 price #ads4 cloth4 ,boyd's ,turkish ,interpreter3 a ,grammar of the ,turkish ,language4 #hvo1 price #abs4 ,bridgnell's ,indian ,commercial ,tables4 ,royal #hvo1 price #bas41 half-bound4 ,the ,bombay ,quarterly ,review4 ,nos4 #a to #i at #es4 #aj to #ac1 price #fs4 each4 ,baillie's ,land ,tax of ,india4 ,according to the ,moohummudan ,law4 #hvo1 price #fs4 cloth4 ,baillie's ,moohummudan ,law of ,sale4 #hvo1 price #ads4 cloth4 ,irving's ,theory and ,practice of ,caste4 #hvo1 price #es4 cloth4 ,gingell's ,ceremonial ,usages of the ,chinese4 ,imperial #hvo1 price #is4 cloth4 ,,new ,,cheap ,,series ,,of ,,popular ,,works4 ,in ,small ,post #hvo1 with large ,type1 on good ,paper1 and neat cloth binding4 ,lectures on the ,english ,humourists of the #ahth ,century4 ,by ,w4 ,m4 ,,thackeray1 ,author of 8,vanity ,fair10 8,the ,virginians10 c4 ,price #bs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,british ,rule in ,india4 ,by ,,harriet ,,martineau4 ,price #bs4 #f;d41 cloth4 ,the ,political ,economy of ,art4 ,by ,,john ,,ruskin1 ,m4,a4 ,price #bs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,,to ,,be ,,followed ,,by ,the ,town2 its ,memorable ,characters and ,events4 ,by ,,leigh ,,hunt4 ,with #de ,cuts4 ,,and ,,other ,,standard ,,works4 99 99 99 99 99 ,,cheap ,,series ,,of ,,popular ,,fictions4 ,well printed1 in large type1 on good paper1 and strongly bound in cloth4 ,jane ,eyre4 ,by ,,currer ,,bell4 ,price #bs4 #f;d4 cloth4 8#8,jane ,eyre' is a remarkable production4 ,freshness and originality1 truth and passion1 singular felicity in the description of natural scenery1 and in the analysation of human thought1 enable this tale to stand boldly out from the mass1 and to assume its own place in the bright field of romantic literature40--,times4 ,shirley4 ,by ,,currer ,,bell4 ,price #bs4 #f;d4 cloth4 8,the peculiar power which was so greatly admired in #8,jane ,eyre' is not absent from this book4 ,it possesses deep interest1 and an irresistible grasp of reality4 ,there are scenes which1 for strength and delicacy of emotion are not transcended in the range of ,english fiction40--,examiner4 ,villette4 ,by ,,currer ,,bell4 ,price #bs4 #f;d4 cloth4 8,this novel amply sustains the fame of the author of #8,jane ,eyre' and #8,shirley' as an original and powerful writer40--,examiner4 ,wuthering ,heights and ,agnes ,grey4 ,by ,,ellis and ,,acton ,,bell4 ,with ,memoir by ,currer ,bell4 ,price #bs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,a ,lost ,love4 ,by ,,ashford ,,owen4 ,price #bs4 cloth4 ,deerbrook4 ,by ,,harriet ,,martineau4 ,price #bs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,paul ,ferroll4 ,fourth ,edition4 ,price #bs4 cloth4 ,,to ,,be ,,followed ,,by ,school for ,fathers4 ,by ,,talbot ,,gwynne4 ,price #bs4 cloth4 7,now ,ready47 ,tales of the ,colonies4 ,by ,,charles ,,rowcroft4 ,price #bs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,,new ,,novels4 7,,to ,,be ,,had ,,at ,,all ,,libraries74 ,eva ,desmond2 or1 ,mutation4 #c vols4 7,now ready47 ,my ,lady3 a ,tale of ,modern ,life4 #b vols4 7,just ready47 ,maud ,skillicorne's ,penance4 ,by ,,mary ,,catherine ,,jackson1 ,author of 8,the ,story of ,my ,wardship40 #b vols4 8,the style is natural1 and displays considerable dramatic power40--,critic4 ,the ,crudest ,wrong of ,all4 ,by the ,author of 8,margaret2 or1 ,prejudice at ,home40 #a vol4 8,it has the first requisite of a work of fiction--it is amusing40--,globe4 ,the ,moors and the ,fens4 ,by ,f4 ,g4 ,,trafford4 #c vols4 8,the plot is unhackneyed1 and the composition is particularly good40--,critic4 8,the plot is natural1 and skilfully worked out2 many of the scenes are described with great power1 and the characters look like portraits from life40--,ladies' ,newspaper4 ,gaston ,bligh4 ,by ,l4 ,s4 ,,lavenu1 ,author of 8,erlesmere40 #b vols4 ,the ,three ,chances4 ,by the ,author of 8,the ,fair ,carew40 #c vols4 ,the ,white ,house by the ,sea3 a ,love ,story4 ,by ,m4 ,,betham-,,edwards4 #b vols4 ,riverston4 ,by ,,georgiana ,m4 ,,craik4 #c vols4 ,the ,professor4 ,by ,,currer ,,bell4 #b vols4 ,the ,noble ,traytour4 ,a ,chronicle4 #c vols4 ,farina2 a ,legend of ,cologne4 ,by ,,george ,,meredith4 #a vol4 ,below the ,surface3 a ,story of ,english ,country ,life4 #c vols4 ,the ,roua ,pass2 or1 ,englishmen in the ,highlands4 ,by ,,erick ,,mackenzie4 #c vols4 ,kathie ,brande4 ,by ,,holme ,,lee4 #b vols4 ,friends of ,bohemia2 or1 ,phases of ,london ,life4 ,by ,e4 ,m4 ,,whitty1 ,author of 8,the ,governing ,classes40 #b vols4 ,lucian ,playfair4 ,by ,,thomas ,,mackern4 #c vols4 ,,novels ,,forthcoming ,sylvan ,holt's ,daughter4 ,by ,,holme ,,lee1 ,author of 8,kathie ,brande10 c4 #c vols4 7,nearly ready47 ,lost and ,won4 ,by ,,georgiana ,m4 ,,craik1 ,author of 8,riverston40 #a vol4 ,an ,old ,debt4 ,by ,,florence ,,dawson4 #b vols4 ,old and ,young4 #a vol4 ,a ,new ,novel4 ,by the ,author of 8,amberhill40 #c vols4 ,a ,new ,novel4 ,by the ,author of 8,tales of the ,bush10 c4 #c vols4 99 99 99 99 99 ,,new ,,books ,,for ,,young ,,readers4 ,by the ,author of 8,round the ,fire10 c4 ,old ,gingerbread and the ,school-boys4 ,with ,four ,coloured ,plates4 ,price #cs4 cloth4 7,now ,ready47 ,unica3 a ,story for ,sunday4 ,with ,four ,cuts4 ,price #cs4 cloth4 7,now ,ready47 ,willie's ,birthday2 showing how a ,little ,boy did what he ,liked1 and how he ,enjoyed it4 ,with ,four ,illustrations4 ,price #bs4 #f;d41 cloth4 ,willie's ,best3 a ,sunday ,story4 ,with ,four ,illustrations4 ,price #bs4 #f;d4 cloth4 8,graceful little tales1 containing some pretty parables1 and a good deal of simple feeling40--,economist4 8,extremely well written story books1 amusing and moral1 and got up in a very handsome style40--,morning ,herald4 ,uncle ,jack1 the ,fault ,killer4 ,with ,four ,illustrations4 ,price #cs4 cloth4 8,an excellent little book of moral improvement made pleasant to children2 it is far beyond the common-place moral tale in design and execution40--,globe4 ,round the ,fire3 ,six ,stories for ,young ,readers4 ,square #afmo1 with ,four ,illustrations1 price #cs4 cloth4 8,charmingly written tales for the young40--,leader4 8,six delightful little stories40--,guardian4 8,simple and very interesting40--,national ,review4 8,true children's stories40--,athenum4 99 99 99 99 99 ,the ,king of the ,golden ,river2 or1 the ,black ,brothers4 ,by ,,john ,,ruskin1 ,m4,a4 ,third ,edition1 with #bb ,illustrations by ,,richard ,,doyle4 ,price #bs4 #f;d4 8,this little fancy tale is by a master-hand4 ,the story has a charming moral40--,examiner4 ,rhymes for ,little ,ones4 ,with numerous ,cuts4 ,price #as4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,,miscellaneous4 ,sir ,john ,herschel's ,astronomical ,observations made at the ,cape of ,good ,hope4 #dto1 with plates1 price #dl4 #ds4 cloth4 ,darwin's ,geological ,observations on ,coral ,reefs1 ,volcanic ,islands1 and on ,south ,america4 ,with maps1 plates1 and woodcuts1 #ajs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,levi's ,commercial ,law of the ,world4 ,two ,vols41 royal #dto1 price #fl4 cloth4 ,playford's ,hints for ,investing ,money4 ,second ,edition1 post #hvo1 price #bs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,sir ,john ,forbes's ,memorandums in ,ireland4 ,two ,vols41 post #hvo1 price #al4 #as4 cloth4 ,leigh ,hunt's ,men1 ,women1 and ,books4 ,two ,vols4 ,price #ajs4 cloth4 -------- ,table ,talk4 #cs4 #f;d4 cloth4 -------- ,wit and ,humour4 #es4 cloth4 -------- ,jar of ,honey4 #es4 cloth4 ,juvenile ,delinquency4 ,by ,m4 ,,hill and ,c4 ,f4 ,,cornwallis4 ,post #hvo1 price #fs4 cloth4 ,doubleday's ,true ,law of ,population4 ,third ,edition1 #hvo1 #ajs4 cloth4 ,mc,cann's ,argentine ,provinces1 c4 ,two ,vols41 post #hvo1 with illustrations1 price #bds4 cloth4 ,goethe's ,conversations with ,eckermann4 ,translated by ,,john ,,oxenford4 ,two ,vols41 post #hvo1 #ajs4 cloth4 ,kavanagh's ,women of ,christianity ,exemplary for ,piety and ,charity4 ,post #hvo1 with ,portraits1 price #abs41 in embossed cloth1 gilt edges4 ,elementary ,works on ,social ,economy4 ,uniform in foolscap #hvo1 half-bound4 ,i4--,,outlines ,,of ,,social ,,economy4 #as4 #f;d4 ,,ii4--,,progressive ,,lessons ,,in ,,social ,,science4 ,,iii4--,,introduction ,,to ,,the ,,social ,,sciences4 #bs4 ,,iv4--,,outlines ,,of ,,the ,,understanding4 #bs4 ,v4--,,what ,,am ,i8 ,,where ,,am ,i8 ,,what ,,ought ,i ,,to ,,do8 c4 #as4 sewed4 ,swainson's ,lectures on ,new ,zealand4 ,crown #hvo1 price #bs4 #f;d4 cloth4 ,swainson's ,account of ,auckland4 ,post #hvo1 with a ,view1 price #fs4 cloth4 ,,poetry4 ,the ,six ,legends of ,king ,goldenstar4 ,by the late ,,anna ,,bradstreet4 ,fcap4 #hvo1 price #es4 8,the author evinces more than ordinary power1 a vivid imagination1 guided by a mind of lofty aim40--,globe4 ,england in ,time of ,war4 ,by ,,sydney ,,dobell1 ,author of 8,balder10 8,the ,roman10 c4 ,crown #hvo1 #es4 cloth4 8,that ,mr4 ,dobell is a poet1 #8,england in time of ,war' bears witness in many single lines1 and in two or three short poems40--,athenum4 ,the ,cruel ,sister1 ,,and ,,other ,,poems4 ,fcap4 #hvo1 #ds4 cl4 8,there are traces of power1 and the versification displays freedom and skill40--,guardian4 ,poems of ,past ,years4 ,by ,sir ,,arthur ,,hallam ,,elton1 ,bart41 ,m4,p4 ,fcap4 #hvo1 #cs4 cloth4 8,a refined1 scholarly1 and gentlemanly mind is apparent all through this volume40--,leader4 ,poems4 ,by ,mrs4 ,,frank ,p4 ,,fellows4 ,fcap4 #hvo1 #cs4 cl4 8,there is easy simplicity in the diction1 and elegant naturalness in the thought40--,spectator4 ,poetry from ,life4 ,by ,c4 ,m4 ,k4 ,fcap4 #hvo1 cl4 gilt1 #es4 8,elegant verses4 ,the author has a pleasing fancy and a refined mind40--,economist4 ,poems4 ,by ,,walter ,r4 ,,cassels4 ,fcap4 #hvo1 price #cs4 #f;d4 cloth4 8,mr4 ,cassels has deep poetical feeling1 and gives promise of real excellence4 ,his poems are written sometimes with a strength of expression by no means common40--,guardian4 ,garlands of ,verse4 ,by ,,thomas ,,leigh4 ,fcap4 #hvo1 price #es4 cloth4 8,one of the best things in the #8,garlands of ,verse' is an ,ode to ,toil4 ,there1 as elsewhere1 there is excellent feeling40--,examiner4 ,balder4 ,by ,,sydney ,,dobell4 ,crown #hvo1 #gs4 #f;d4 cloth4 8,the writer has fine qualities2 his level of thought is lofty1 and his passion for the beautiful has the truth of instinct40--,athenum4 ,poems4 ,by ,,william ,,bell ,,scott4 ,fcap4 #hvo1 #es4 cl4 8,mr4 ,scott has poetical feeling1 keen observation1 deep thought1 and command of language40--,spectator4 ,poems4 ,by ,,mary ,,maynard4 ,fcap4 #hvo1 #ds4 cloth4 8,we have rarely met with a volume of poems displaying so large an amount of power1 blended with so much delicacy of feeling and grace of expression40--,church of ,england ,quarterly4 ,poems4 ,by ,,currer1 ,,ellis1 and ,,acton ,,bell4 ,fcap4 #hvo1 #ds4 cloth4 ,select ,odes of ,horace4 ,in ,english ,lyrics4 ,by ,j4 ,t4 ,,black4 ,fcap4 #hvo1 price #ds4 cloth4 8,rendered into ,english ,lyrics with a vigour and heartiness rarely1 if ever1 surpassed40--,critic4 ,london3 ,printed by ,,smith1 ,,elder ,,co41 ,little ,green ,arbour ,court4 ,,transcriber',s ,,notes ,this e-book uses the text of the original work4 ,inconsistent capitalisation1 hyphenation and spelling have been retained 7spungy_/spongy and spunging_/sponging2 scear_/sear2 immoveable_/immovable2 ,mini_/,minie1 bareled_/barelled1 brasing_/brazing2 ,froissart_/,froisart2 fuse_/fuze2 ,greenerean_/,greenerian2 ,monk_/,monck2 etc471 except as mentioned below under ,changes4 ,the two typographical forms of fractions 7for example1 #a_/b and #a-hth7 have been retained4 ,the ,list of ,plates shows 7slightly7 different texts from the captions in the plates themselves4 ,the ,list of ,illustrations is incomplete1 and not all illustrations have the captions listed in the ,list of ,illustrations4 ,the sometimes slight difference in wording between the ,table of ,contents and the actual chapter headings has been retained4 ,textual remarks ,page #ab1 snaphaunce is not a ,dutch word2 it is derived from the ,dutch snaphaan4 ,page #fd1 footnote3 the original does not show the footnote anchor2 the footnote has been included without its anchor4 ,possibly the footnote refers to the ,point ,blank ,range data for the #aj-;inch and #h-;inch howitzers4 ,page #bci1 price calculations3 the total for single guns should be #ais4 #i;d4 ,the other amounts given in the text do not correspond with the table2 this has not been changed4 ,page #bdj1 price calculations3 the totals for double and single guns should be #afs4 #c;d4 and #is4 #i;d41 respectively4 ,page #ac 7first set of advertisements71 amount of shooting is possibly an error for account of shooting4 ,french accents have not been corrected or added 7,andr1 ,minie1 panouissement1 etc471 ,latin accents have been retained1 unless mentioned below4 ,changes made to the text ,footnotes and illustrations have been moved2 some illustrations have been rotated #ij ,some missing_/incorrect punctuation has been added or corrected silently ,page vii3 ,polygroove changed to ,poly-groove as elsewhere ,page ix3 ,firelock changed to ,fire-lock as in the text ,page xi3 ,badajoz changed to ,badajos2 ,mallett changed to ,mallet 7#bx7 as in the text ,page xvi3 manufactury changed to manufactory as in the text ,page #e3 a cubic distance changed to a cubit distance ,page #h3 likwise changed to likewise ,page #bc3 suphuretted changed to sulphuretted ,page #bg 7table73 #i4ij changed to #iij ,page #db3 horizonal changed to horizontal ,page #fc3 almost from a class changed to almost form a class ,page #ia3 enginering changed to engineering ,page #aca3 impres changed to impress ,page #aci3 fusees changed to fuses ,page #adj3 wthin changed to within ,page #aed3 furnance changed to furnace ,page #aei3 is is changed to is ,page #afj3 exhibibits changed to exhibits ,page #aff3 ,ther changed to ,there ,page #afi3 #adjbfe changed to #adjfbe ,page #baa3 fustrum changed to frustum ,page #bai3 ,weimer changed to ,weimar ,page #bbi3 artizan changed to artisan ,page #bci3 ,wedgebury changed to ,wednesbury as elsewhere ,page #bdi3 twent changed to twenty ,page #bga3 answert hat changed to answer that ,page #cja3 expansive powder changed to expansive power ,page #cjc3 impossibity changed to impossibility ,page #cag3 filed changed to filled ,page #cef3 frustrum changed to frustum ,page #ceh3 frustrum changed to frustum ,page #dcf3 to to changed to to ,page #e 7first set of advertisements73 ,,steeet changed to ,,street ,page #h 7first set of advertisements73 ,,brmingham changed to ,,birmingham ,page #c 7second set of advertisements73 ,gobe changed to ,globe ,page #e 7second set of advertisements73 ,bouchier changed to ,bourchier