,transcrib]'s ,note3 ,! text is divid$ into #e ,conf]5ces & #da sections4 ,m>g9al notes indicat+ ! />t ( individual sections h be5 conv]t$ into section head+s4 ,o!r notes h be5 numb]$ & mov$ to ! end ( ea* ,conf]5ce4 ,!y (t5 ref] to ! foll[+ 7r ?an prec$+7 passage1 & if s are position$ accord+ly4 ,! locations ( ! m>k] = ,note #ac1 & ( ! />t ( ,section #h1 are uncle>3 !y h be5 ins]t$ 9 accordance ) ! s5se ( ! text4 ,o!r m>k]s t d n correspond to m>g9al notes h be5 remov$4 ,! 99 t are reta9$ 9 sections #aa1 #ac & #ah d n indicate m>g9al notes1 b in/ead function z bullet po9ts4 ,v>iations 9 spell+ h be5 reta9$ ) ! exception ( ! foll[+3 ,conf]5ce #a ,summ>y3 byass'd *ang$ to bypass'd4 ,conf]5ce #b ,section #ag3 be-belief *ang$ to belief & absolure to absolute4 ,conf]5ce #e ,section #cf en5t *ang$ to t55t2 ,section #cg ,a!nasian *ang$ to ,a?anasian4 ,obscur$ text has be5 transcrib$ z foll[s3 ,conf]5ce #a ,section #h3 8h] transcrib$ z ,lu!r4 ,conf]5ce #c ,section #ah3 ! s5t5ce beg9n+ ,b if x be said has be5 recon/ruct$ f ! "w cit$4 ,conf]5ce #e ,section #cj3 ! phrases n-con=m+ to & ,z to ,*>ity h be5 recon/ruct$4 ,at ! beg9n+ ( ,conf]5ce #a a brace1 ext5d+ ov] sev]al l9es1 has be5 replac$ by a column ( individual braces4 ,italics are indicat$ by und]scores & ,greek by plus signs4 ,:5 a ^w 9 italics is foll[$ by 's ! latt] may or may n be italicis$4 ,?is inconsi/5cy has be5 reta9$4 ,inconsi/5t hyph5ation has also be5 reta9$4 ,! ,text has be5 correct$ 9 accordance ) ! ,errata section4 ,mismat*$ brackets & p>5!ses h be5 remov$ & app>5t punctuation errors correct$4 ,,! ,prote/ants ,plea ,,= ,a ,,soc9ian3 ,ju/ify+ ,8 ,doctr9e f be+ opposite to ,,scripture ,,or ,,*ur*-,,au?ority2 ,& ,him f be+ ,guilty ( ,,h]esie1 or ,,s*ism4 ,9 ,five ,conf]5ces4 ,publi%'d ) ,all[ance4 ,,london1 ,pr9t$ by ,h5ry ,hills1 ,pr9t] to ! ,k+'s ,mo/ ,excell5t ,maje/y = ,8 ,h\%old & ,*appel4 #afhf4 ,,! ,fir/ ,conf]5ce4 ,! ,soc9ian's ,prote/ant-,plea = 8 n hold+ any ?+ contr>y to ! ,holy ,scriptures4 #a4 ,t he believes all conta9$ 9 ! ,scriptures to be ,god's ,^w2 & !re=e implicitly believes ^? tru?s1 aga9/ :i* he errs4 4 #b4 #b4 ,t also he use? 8 be/ endeavor to f9d ! true s5se ( ,scriptures3 &1 t m is n requir$ ( him f ,god = 8 ,fai? or ,salvation1 ?an do+ 8 be/ endeav\r = atta9+ x4 4 #c4 #c4 ,t1 z = an explicite ,fai? requir$ ( "s po9ts necess>y1 he is suffici5tly assur$1 t ?is po9t conc]n+ ! ,son's ,consub/antiality ) ! ,fa!r1 z to ! affirmative1 is n s f ! ,prote/ant's affirm+ all necess>ies to be cle> 9 ,scripture1 ev5 to ! unle>n$2 :i* ?is1 9 ! affirmative1 is n to him4 4 #d4 #d4 ,t sev]al express1 & pla9 ,scriptures d p]swade him1 t ! negative 7if ei!r7 is necess>y to be believ$2 & t f ! cle>ness ( ,scriptures1 he ha? z mu* c]ta9ty 9 ?is po9t1 z ,prote/ants c h f !m 9 "s o!r1 held aga9/ ! common expressions ( ! =m] times ( ! ,*ur*4 4 #f1 #h4 #e4 ,t1 = ! "r und]/&+ ( ,scriptures1 ei!r he may be c]ta9 ( a j indu/ry us$2 or else1 t ,prote/ants1 9 ass]t+ t ! ,scriptures are pla9 only to ! indu/ri\s2 & !n1 t none are c]ta91 :5 !y h us$ a j indu/ry1 ?us mu/ /ill rema9 also unc]ta9 9 _! ,fai?2 z n kn[+1 :e!r "s defect 9 ?is _! indu/ry cause? !m n to mi/ake ! ,scriptures4 #f4 ,la/ly2 ,t none h us$ m dilig5ce 9 ! se>* ( ,scripture1 ?an ! ,soc9ians1 z appe>s by _! ,writ+s1 addict+ !mselves :olly to ?is ,^w ( ,god1 & n suff]+ !mselves to be any way bypass'd by any o!r humane1 ei!r mod]n1 or anci5t ,au?ority4 4 #i4 ,:]e1 ,! ,prote/ant's1 & ,soc9ian's pret5d$ ,c]ta9ty ( ! s5se ( ,scripture appreh5d$ by !m1 ,digress4 & made ! gr\nd ( _! ,fai? aga9/ ! s5se ( ! same ,scripture decl>$ by ! major "p ( ! ,*ur* is exam9$4 4 #i4 4 #a4 ,to %ew ! invalidity ( su* a ,guide z ,prote/ants h fram$ to !mselves = pres]v+ ! true ,fai?1 & suppress+ ,h]esies1 ha? = sev]al ye>s be5 ! ,subject ( div]s ,mod]n ,p5s3 ,b1 because ,in/ances & ,examples1 seem to "s1 m weighty & conv9c+1 x is ?\ght fit 7! m to awak51 & ! bett] to satisfie him7 "h to let ! ,read] see :at ,apology a ,soc9ian 7:o ?o' d5y+ ! ,tr9ity1 & our ,saviors ,deity1 yet1 mo/ zeal\sly urges ,scripture1 & its pla9ness 9 all necess>ies1 z if x ju/ifi$ 8 own ,errors2 or t he ,err$ only 9 matt]s n necess>y7 ^u ! ,prote/ant ,pr9ciples may return = himself to a ,prote/ant endeav\r+ to r$uce him to ! true ,fai? & ! ,nic5e ,cre$2 & us+ any ( ^! five ,motives !reto1 viz4 ,! ,te/imony ( #a4 ,scripture4 #b4 ,ca?olic-,*ur*-,au?ority4 #c4 ,c\ncils1 ) ! ,dang] & ,guilt ( #d4 ,h]esie1 & #e4 ,s*ism4 ,n int5d+ h]eby to equal all ,prote/ant ,op9ions ) ! ,soc9ian2 b inf]r+ t ^! ,pleas z relat+ to ^! ,motives w z rationally ju/ifie ! ,soc9ian z ! ,prote/ant4 ,=1 suppose a ,prote/ant1 fir/1 conc]n+ ! ,scriptures1 "q a ,soc9ian 9 ?is mann]4 ,prot4 ,:y d y1 to ! great dang] ( y\r s\l1 & salvation1 n believe1 ,god ! ,son to be ( "o1 & ! same ess5ce1 & sub/ance ) ,god ! ,fa!r1 x be+ s pr9cipal an ,article ( ! ,*ri/ian ,fai?1 deliv]$ 9 ! ,holy ,scriptures8 ,soc4 ,to give y a satisfactory acc\nt ( ?is matt]4 ,i d believe1 ) o!r ,*ri/ians1 t ! ,scriptures are ! ,^w ( ,god2 &1 ) o!r ,prote/ants1 t !y are a p]fect ,rule ( my fai?4 4 #b4 ,prot4 ,b1 ?is secures y n1 unless y believe accord+ to ?is ,rule2 :i* 9 ?is po9t1 y d n4 ,soc4 ,h[ev] ,i believe 9 ?is po9t2 truly1 or falsly2 ,i am secure t my ,fai? is entire1 z to all necess>y po9ts ( ,fai?4 ,prot4 ,h[ s8 ,soc4 ,because1 z ,m4 ,*ill+wor? sai?#a--;,he t believes all t is 9 ! ,bible1 all t is 9 ! ,scriptures 7z ,i d7 believes all t is necess>y !re4 ,prot4 ,?is mu/ ne$s be true3 b mean :ile1 if !re be ei!r "s "p ( ,scripture n kn[n at all by y2 or ! true s5se ( "s "p ( t y "k 7=1 ! ,scripture1 z t ,au?or notes#b1 is n s mu* ! words1 z ! s5se7 be mi/ak5 by y1 h[ c y say1 y believe all ! ,scriptures8 ,=1 :5 y say1 y believe all ! ,scripture1 y mean only ?is3 t y believe1 t1 :atsoev] is ! true s5se !re(1 t is ,god's ,^w2 & mo/ c]ta9ly true3 :i* belief ( y\rs do? v well consi/ ) y\r n believ+1 or also y\r believ+ ! contr>y to ! true s5se !re(3 & !n y1 n believ+ ! true s5se ( "s "p ( x at lea/1 may also n believe ! true s5se ( some?+ necess>y !re2 :i* is q contr>y to y\r conclusion "h4 4 #c4 ,soc4 #c----;,i believe1 t t s5se ( !m :i* ,god int5de? :atsoev] x is1 is c]ta9ly true2 ,& ?us ,i believe implicitely ev5 ^? v tru?s1 aga9/ :i* ,i err4 ,next3 #d----;,i d my be/ endeav\r to believe ,scripture 9 ! true s5se !re(4 ,by my be/ endeav\r ,i mean#e1 su* a measure ( indu/ry1 z humane prud5ce1 & ord9>y discretion 7my abilities1 & opportunities1 my di/ractions1 & h9drances1 & all o!r ?+s consid]$7 %all advise me unto 9 a matt] ( su* consequ5ce4 ,( us+ :i* endeav\r also1 ,i conceive1 ,i may be suffici5tly c]ta93 = o!rwise1 ,i c h no c]ta9ty ( any ?+ ,i believe f ?is compleat ,rule ( ,scriptures2 ?is due endeavor be+ ! condition1 :i* ,prote/ants require1 t ,i %all n be1 z to all necess>ies1 deceiv$ 9 ! s5se ( ,scripture4 ,n[1 be+ consci\s to my self ( su* a "r endeavor us$3 #f----;,= me1 to believe1 fur!r1 ?is or t to be ! true s5se ( "s ,scriptures2 or to believe ! true s5se ( !m1 & to avoid ! false1 is n necess>y1 ei!r to my fai? or salvation4 ,=1 if ,god w\ld h _h 8 mean+ 9 ^! places c]ta9ly kn[n1 h[ c\ld x /& ) 8 wisdom1 to be s want+ to 8 own w & end1 z to speak obscurely8 ,or h[ c x consi/ ) 8 ju/ice to require ( m5 to "k c]ta9ly ! mean+ ( ^? words :i* he himself ha? n reveal$8 #g----;,= my error or ignorance 9 :at is n pla9ly conta9$ 9 ,scripture1 aft] my be/ endeav\r us$2 to say t ,god w damn me = su* errors1 :o am a lov] ( him1 & lov] ( tru?1 is to rob man ( 8 com=t1 & ,god ( 8 goodness2 is to make man desp]ate1 & ,god a ,tyrant4 4 #d4 ,prot4 ,b ?is def5ce w no way s]ve y\r turn = all po9ts ( ,fai? reveal$ 9 ,scripture3 = y ought to h ( "s po9ts an express & explicite ,fai?4 ,soc4 ,( :at po9ts8 ,prot4 ,( all ^? t are fundam5tal & necess>y4 ,soc4 ,!n if ?is po9t ( ,consub/antiality ( ! ,son ) ,god ! ,fa!r be none ( ! ,fundam5tals1 & necess>ies1 :]e9 ,i am to h a "r & an explicite ,fai?1 ! acc\nt ,i h giv5 y already1 ,i hope1 is satisfactory4 4 #e4 ,b next3 ,i am secure1 t ?is po9t1 :i* is ! subject ( our disc\rse1 at lea/ 9 ! affirmative !re(1 is no fundam5tal2 =1 accord+ to ! ,prote/ant pr9ciples #h----,! ,scripture is a ,rule1 z suffici5tly p]fect1 s suffici5tly intelligible 9 ?+s necess>y1 to all t h und]/&+2 :e!r le>n$1 or unle>n$4 ,nei!r is any ?+ necess>y to be believ$1 b :at is pla9ly reveal$3 = to say1 t :5 a place ( ,scripture by reason ( ambigu\s t]ms lies indiff]5t betwe5 div]s s5ses1 :]e( "o is true1 & ! o!r false1 t ,god oblige? m5 "u pa9 ( damnation n to mi/ake ?r\gh error1 & humane frailty1 is to make ,god a ,tyrant1 & to say t he requires ( u c]ta9ty to atta9 t end1 = ! atta9+ :]e( we h no c]ta9 means4 ,9 f9e1 #i :]e ,scriptures are pla91 z !y are 9 necess>ies1 !y ne$ no infallible ,int]pret]1 no fur!r explanation to me2 & :]e !y are n pla91 !re if ,i1 us+ dilig5ce to f9d ! tru?1 d yet miss ( x1 & fall into ,error1 !re is no dang] 9 x4 ,prot4 ,true4 ,su* necess>y po9ts are cle> to ! unle>n$1 us+ a due ,indu/ry1 void ( a contr>y int]e/1 c4 ,soc4 ,& 9 su* indu/ry ,i may be assur$1 ,i h n be5 defici5t1 hav+ be/[$ mu* /udy on ?is matt]1 read ! ,controv]sie on bo? sides2 comp>$ ,texts1 c4 7z also appe>s 9 ! dilig5t writ+s ( o!rs ( my p]swasion72 & aft] all ?is1 ! s5se ( ,scripture also1 :i* ,i embrace1 7a s5se1 y "k1 decri$ & p]secut$ by mo/ ,*ri/ians7 is v contr>y to all my secul> relations1 int]e/1 & pr(it4 4 #f4 ,n[1 aft] all ?is se>* ,i h us$1 ,i am s f> satisfi$1 t ?is po9t1 on ! affirmative side1 is n cle>1 & evid5t 9 ,scripture 7& !re=e no ,fundam5tal7 t ,i c produce mo/ cle> & evid5t places out ( ! ,scriptures 7if a man c be c]ta9 ( any ?+ f ! p]spicuity ( its ,expressions7 t ! contr>y ( x is s4 ,see ,crellius 9 ! ,preface to 8 ,book ,de uno ,deo ,patre1----,hc de uno ,deo ,patre s5t5tia plurimis1 ac cl>issimis sacr>um lit]>um te/imoniis nititur----,evid5s s5t5ti v]itas1 rationum firmissim>um sacris lit]is spont subnasc5tium multitudo1 +5ii no/ri t5uitatem sublevat1 c4----,argum5ta1 qu ex sacris lit]is deprompsimus1 p] se plana sunt1 ac facilia adeo quidem1 ut eorum vim decl9>e ali ratione non poss9t adv]s>ii1 quam ut v]borum simplicitate tum ipsi deflectant1 tum nos abduc]e con5tur4 ,& see ! p>ticul> places ( ,scripture :i* !y urge 7:]e1 z to ! expression1 & o!r ,texts be+ laid aside1 t seems to be said1 z x 7 totidem v]bis1 :i* ! ,soc9ians ma9ta971 ,joh4 #ad4 #bh4 #ag4 #c4 ,ep4 #a ,cor4 #h4 #f4----;,col4 #a4 #ae4 ,rev4 #c4 #ad4 ,i set n d[n ?is to c\nt5ance _! ,cause1 b to %ew _! ,confid5ce4 4 #g4 ,prot4 ,o /range ,presumption6 ,& is n y\r judgm5t1 !n1 liable to mi/ake 9 ! true s5se ( ^! ,scriptures1 because y /rongly p]suade y\r self1 !y are mo/ evid5t on y\r side8 ,soc4 ',tis true1 t ,i may mi/ake 9 ! s5se ( "s ,scripture2 b x foll[s n f h5ce1 t ,i c be c]ta9 ( ! s5se ( no ,scriptures4 ,to answ] y 9 ! words ( ,mr4 ,*ill+wor?#aj----,?o' ,i pret5d n to c]ta9 means 9 int]pret+ all ,scripture1 p>ticul>ly su* places z are obscure & ambigu\s2 yet ?is me?9ks %\ld be no imp$im5t1 b t we may h c]ta9 means ( n err+ 91 & ab\t ! s5se ( ^? places :i* are s pla9 & cle>1 t !y ne$ no ,int]pret]s2 & 9 su* ?is my ,fai? is conta9$4 ,if y ask me1 h[ ,i c be sure1 t ,i "k ! true mean+ ( ^! places8 ,i ask y aga92 ,c y be sure y und]/& :at ,i1 or any man else sai?2 ,!y t he>d our ,savi\r & ! ,apo/les ,prea*1 c !y h suffici5t assurance t !y und]/ood at any "t :at !y w\ld h !m d8 ,if n1 to :at end did !y he> !m8 ,if !y c\ld1 :y may n ,i be z well assur$1 t ,i und]/& suffici5tly1 :at ,i conceive pla9 9 _! ,writ+s8 ,aga92 ,i pray tell me1 :e!r d y c]ta9ly "k ! s5se ( ^! ,scriptures1 = ! evid5ce ( :i* y sep>at$ f ! ,*ur* t 0 be=e ,lu!r1 requir+ con=mity to ! contr>y ,doctr9es1 z a condition ( h] ,communion8 ,if y d1 !n give u leave to h ! same means1 & ! same abilities to "k o!r pla9 places1 :i* y h to "k ^!4 ,= if all ! ,scripture be obscure1 h[ c y "k ! s5se ( ^! places8 ,if "s places ( x be pla91 :y %\ld ,i /ay "h8----#aa ,if y ask1 see+ ,i may possibly err1 h[ c ,i be assur$ ,i d n8 ,i ask y aga91 see+ y\r eyesight may deceive y1 h[ c y be sure y see ! ,sun1 :5 y d see x8 #ab ,a ,judge may possibly err 9 ,judgm5t1 c he !re=e nev] h assurance t he ha? judg$ rightly8 a ,travell] may possibly mi/ake 8 way2 mu/ ,i !re=e be d\btful :e!r ,i am 9 ! "r way f my ,hall to my ,*amb]8 ,or c our ,london ,c>ri] h no c]ta9ty 9 ! middle ( ! day1 :5 he is sob]1 & 9 8 wits1 t he is 9 8 way to ,london8#ac--,?is ,i am c]ta9 (1 t ,god w n require ( me a c]ta9ly un]r+ belief1 unless he _h giv5 me a c]ta9 means to avoid error1 & if ,i use ^? :i* ,i h1 w nev] require ( me1 t ,i use t :i* ,i h n#ad4----,?is is ,mr4 ,*ill+wor?'s solid ,plea1 aga9/ ! ,papi/'s gr& ,objection1 = ! prov+ an unc]ta9ty 9 ! ,prote/ant's ,fai? ^u any _! pret5ce ( evid5t ,scripture4 ,sect4 #h4 ,prot4 ,b ! ,scriptures1 :i* y urge aga9/ ! ,son's be+ ! same "o only ,god ) ,god ! ,fa!r1 c>ry n ! same evid5ce & cle>ness1 z ^? ,scriptures d1 :]eon ,prote/ants build ! c]ta9ty ( _! ,fai? aga9/ ! ,papi/s1 or aga9/ ! common ,*ur*-,doctr9es t 7 be=e ,lu!r4 ,soc4 ,t say ! ,papi/s ( y\r pla9 ,scriptures1 :i* y ( m9e3 ,i pray1 :at c be said m pla91 or 9 :at po9t1 9 y\r ,op9ion1 m fundam5tal 7:]e9 we cont5d ,scripture is mo/ cle>1 ev5 to ! unle>n$71 ?an ?is1 9 ,joh4 #ag4 #c4--,ut cognoscant te ,pat] solum v]um ,deum2 1 quem misi/i1 ,jesum ,*ri/um--,&1 #a ,cor4 #h4 #f4 ,unus ,deus1 ,pat]2 unus ,dom9us1 ,jesus4 ,&1 ,eph4 #d4 v]4 #e4 ,unus e/ ,dom9us1 i4 e4 ,jesus2 & !n1 v]4 #f4 ,unus e/ ,deus1 ,pat] omnium--,&1 ,joh4 #ad4 #a4 ,cr$itis 9 ,deum1 9 me cr$ite----,& v4 #bh4 ,pat] meus major me e/4 ,i say1 :at m cle> = prov+ ! ,fa!r 8 be+ ! true1 mo/ high ,god1 & exclud+ ! o!r ,p]sons ! ,son1 or ! ,holy ,gho/ f be+ ! v same ,god8 ,prot4 ,& #a4 :at m cle>1 on ! o!r side1 ?an ^! ,texts1 ,rom4 #i4 #e4 ,( :om1 z conc]n+ ! fle%1 ,*ri/ came1 :o is ov] all1 ,god bless$ = ev]----,&1 ,tit4 #b4 #ac4 ,! glori\s appe>+ ( ! great ,god1 & our ,savi\r ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,& #ae--we are 9 him t is true1 ev5 9 8 ,son ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,?is is ! true ,god & et]nal life1 spok5 by ,/4 ,john1 ! great v9dicator1 aga9/ ,ebion1 ,c]9?us1 ,c>pocrates & o!r1 9 8 "t1 oppos]s ( our ,"l's ,div9ity#af----;,& ,apoc4 #a4 #h4 comp>$ ) #a4 #ag4----;,i am ,alpha & ,omega1 ! beg9n+ & ! end+1 :i* is1 & :i* 01 & :i* is to come1 ! ,almighty8 ,i say1 :at m cle> ?an ^! ,texts1 = %ew+ ! true ,deity ( ,*ri/8 #b4 ,& !n1 h[ _m o!r cle> ,texts are !re1 ass]t+ ! ,et]nity ( our ,"l2 t he is no?+ made or creat$1 b pre-exi/5t be=e ! con/itution ( ! ,_w2 equal ) ,god2 & t ,heav51 & ,e>?1 & all ?+s 7 made by him1 t 7 made2 & t he desc5d$ f ,heav5 f 8 ,fa!r1 :5 he took our nature ^u him8 ,see ,joh4 #a4 #a4 c4--#c4 #ac4 ,heb4 #a4 #b1 #c1 #aj c4--,joh4 #ag4 #e1 #bd4--,phil4 #b4 #f4--;,joh4 #f4 #ch4----af4 #bh4----a4 ,tim4 #c4 #af4--;,heb4 #b4 #ad4 ,& #c4 !n1 8 ,deity & ,et]nity ?us cle>$1 8 ,deity c be no o!r1 ?an1 9 ! total ess5ce !re(1 num]ically ! same ) t ( ,god ! ,fa!r4 ,=1 ^? ( y\r own ,sect1 toge!r ) ! :ole ,*ri/ian _w1 d ackn[l$ge1 #a4 ,t !re is b "o num]ical mo/ high ,god1 an insep>able attribute ( :om is 8 ,creat+ ( ! _w1 & preexi/5ce be=e x4 ,& aga92 #b4 ,t ! sub/ance or ess5ce ( ?is mo/ high ,god1 is n any way divisible1 p>tible or multipliable2 s t1 ,si ,*ri/us ex ,dei sub/anti g5]atus fuit1 tota ei ,patris sub/antia1 eadem num]o1 communicata fuit4 ,see ,volkel4 de v]a ,rel4 l4 #e4 c4 #ab4 ^u :i* consequ5ce well disc]n$1 y\r pr$ecessors 7 con/ra9$ to des]t ,arianism1 or semi-,arianism1 & to take 9 o!r respects a m desp]ate way1 ( d5y+ any pre-exi/5ce ( our ,"l be=e 8 ,inc>nation3 ,to return !n to our bus9ess4 ,all ,scripture be+ equally true2 y "k1 no ,text !re( c be pron\nc$ cle> 9 su* a s5se1 :i* o!rs1 z cle> contradict4 ,! non-consid]ation ( :i* by ! passionate or unle>n$1 is ! "m ( all errors4 ,! ,texts !re=e t y produce "h s manife/ on y\r side1 t !y may n contradict _m m o!rs z cle> aga9/ y1 are to be und]/ood to speak ( our ,"l only accord+ to 8 ,inc>nation1 ,messias & ,m$iator%ip1 9 :i* he ha? an inf]iority to ! ,fa!r & is our ,"l1 by a special ,r$emption ) 8 blood1 9 ano!r mann]1 ?an ,he toge!r ) 8 ,fa!r1 9 ! same ess5ce1 is ! "o true ,god4 ,soc4 ,all ! ,texts y h m5tion$ h be5 dilig5tly consid]$1 & answ]$ by our p>ty4 ,prot4 ,& y\r ,answ]s are new1 =c$1 absurd1 z may cle>ly appe> to any rational & indiff]5t p]son p]us+ ,volkelius l4 #e4 f ! #aj4 to ! #ad4 ,*apt]4 ,b to omit ?is dispute1 z n[ beside my purpose4 ,if y\r s5se ( ! ,scriptures1 y h urg$1 be s manife/ & cle>1 z y pret5d2 h[ comes s great a "p ( ! ,*ri/ian _w 7d\btless rational m571 9 ! s5se ( ^! v ,scriptures s mu* to diff] f y8 ,!re=e "h ,i _c b /ill suppose 9 y ! defect ( a due indu/ry1 well comp>+ ^! ,scriptures1 & void ( pride1 passion1 & o!r int]e/4 ,soc4 ,& ,i return ! l "q to y4 ,if1 on ! cle>ness ( ! express s5se ( ^! ,scriptures1 ,i _c infallibly gr\nd my fai?1 aga9/ _m o!r rational m5 contradict+2 on :at pla9ness ( ! s5se ( any o!r ,scripture is x1 t ,prote/ants c gr\nd !irs aga9/ a contr>y s5se giv5 by ! le>n$2 by sev]al ,c\ncils2 by ! :ole ,*ur* ( "s ages1 z !y d2 n promis+ to ! ,c\ncils1 ev5 to ! f\r fir/1 an absolute1 b conditional ass5t1 viz4 only s f>1 z _! ,decrees agree ) ^! cle> ,scriptures8 ,if nei!r ! pla9 words ( ,scripture c af=d a suffici5t c]ta9ty to me 9 ?is matt]1 :i* ,scriptures1 y say1 9 fundam5tals are to all p]spicu\s 7& su* d _m deem ?is po9t72 nor ,i c h a suffici5t assurance ( us+ an unbia/ indu/ry 9 ! und]/&+ ( ^! ,scriptures1 & also 9 ! comp>+ !m ) o!rs1 9 :i* ,i am consci\s to my self ( no neglect1 ,i see no suffici5t gr\nd ( my presum+ to und]/& any o!r "p ( ,scripture2 & !n1 :]e9 c lye ! assurance ( a ,prote/ant's ,fai?1 = 8 n err+ 9 ,fundam5tals at lea/8 ,bi%op ,lany tells me1#ag ,t :5 we h c]ta9 k ( a ?+1 we may safely le>n f ! ,s*ools1 viz4 ,ubi non e/ =mido contr>ii2 t aft] dilig5t se>* & inquiry :5 !re rema9s no scruple1 d\bt1 & fe> ( ! contr>y1 :5 ! und]/&+ is fixt1 we are said to be c]ta9--,& t !y :o w say x1 & d ?9k s too1 may safely be absolv$ f ! guilt ( disob$i5ce4 ,prot4 #ah,y h a judgm5t ( discretion ,i grant1 & may ,int]pret ,scripture = y\r self3 )\t ! use ( :i* ,judgm5t y _c s]ve ,god ) a reasonable s]vice1 :o are also to give acc\nt ( y\r self1 & are to be sav$ by y\r own ,fai?1 & d p]i% ^u y\r own score4----#ai,none may usurp t royal pr]ogative ( ,heav5 9 prescrib+ infallibly 9 matt]s que/ion$1 b leave all to judge accord+ to ! ,p&ects ( ! ,div9e ,laws1 because ea* ,memb] ( ?is ,society is b\nd to take c>e ( 8 ,s\l1 & ( all ?+s t t5d !reto----#bj;,9 matt]s ( ,religion1 :5 ! "q is1 :e!r any man be a fit judge1 & *oos] = himself1 we suppose m5 hone/1 & su* z und]/& ! diff]5ce betwe5 a mom5t & et]nity4 ,& !n ,i suppose t all ! necess>y po9ts 9 ,religion are pla9 & easie1 & consequ5tly e man 9 ?is case to be a compleat ,judge = himself1 because x conc]ns himself to ,judge aright1 z mu* z et]nal happ9ess is wor?3 & if ?r\gh 8 own default he ,judge amiss1 he alone %all suff] = x4 ,to ,god's righte\s ,judgm5t !re=e ,i mu/ f9ally remit y4 ,at y\r own p]il be x4 ,?is1 ( ! ,soc9ian's ,plea conc]n+ ! ,scripture on 8 side4 4 #i4 ,:]e ! self-cle>ness ( ! s5se ( ,scriptures1 n mi/akable 9 ,fundam5tals1 or necess>ies1 ^u a due indu/ry us$ 7( :i* also rightly us$1 m5 may be suffici5tly assur$17 be+ made ! gr\nd1 z y see1 ( ! ,prote/ants & ,soc9ians ,fai?1 be=e ^! two proce$ to any fur!r conf]5ce1 give me leave1 to int]pose a ^w betwe5 !m1 conc]n+ ?is c]ta9ty s mu* spok5 (1 & presum$ on4 4 #aj4 ,& "h fir/1 f ?is way1 lately tak5 by _m ,prote/ants1 !re seems to be some?+ necess>ily consequ5t1 :i* ,i suppose !y w by no means all[1 viz4 ,t in/ead ( ! ,roman ,*ur* h] sett+ up "s m51 7! ,*ur* ,gov]nors17 z infallible 9 necess>ies1 "h is set up by !m e ,*ri/ian1 if he w1 bo? infallible 9 all necess>ies2 & c]ta9 t he is s4 ,= ! ,scripture !y affirm mo/ cle> 9 all necess>ies to all us+ a due indu/ry1 & ( ?is due indu/ry !y also affirm1 m5 may be c]ta91 t !y h us$ x2 be+ n all1 possible1 endeav\r1 b su* a measure !re( z ord9>y discretion1 c4 advise? to4 7,see ,mr4 ,*ill+wor?1 p4 #ai47 ,& next1 f ?is affirm$1 t e "o may be s c]ta9 9 all ,fundam5tals1 x mu/ be ma9ta9$ also1 t _! spiritual ,guides1 9 a conjunction ( !m1 nay m1 e s+le ,prelate1 or ,presbyt]1 if !y are n1 yet may be1 an infallible ,guide to ! p 9 all ,po9ts necess>y4 ,& !re=e ,m4 ,*ill+wor? freely speaks to ?is purpose#ba----,t ^! also may be bo? 9 ,fundam5tals1 & also 9 "s po9ts unfundam5tal1 bo? c]ta9 ( ! infallibility ( _! ,rule1 & t !y d manife/ly proce$ accord+ to x3 & !n1 9 :at !y are c]ta9 t !y _c be mi/ak51 !y may 7sai? he#bb7 lawfully decide ! controv]sies ab\t !m1 & )\t ra%ness propose _! decrees1 z c]ta91 div9e ,revelations3 & excommunicate or ana!matize any man p]si/+ 9 ! contr>y error4 ,& !re seems reason 9 su* ,ana!ma2 because all o!rs ei!r d or may "k ! tru? ( ! same decrees by ! same c]ta9 means1 z ^! ,gov]nors d4 ,n[ !n2 :at c]ta9ty ! ,guides ( a p>ticul> ,*ur* may h1 ,i hope may also ^? ( ! ,*ur* ,ca?olick3 & !n1 ob$i5ce be+ yield$ to ^! by all _! inf]iors1 ?is w re/ore all ?+s to _! "r c\rse4 ,all ?is foll[s ^u c]ta9ty1 #a4 ,t ,scriptures are pla9 9 ,fundam5tals2 ,& #b4 ,t due indu/ry is us$ to und]/& !m4 ,b1 if y %\ld d5y t m5 c h a c]ta9ty ( _! indu/ry rightly us$2 !n aga91 is all ! fair security ^! m5 promise _! foll[]s ( _! n err+ 9 necess>ies q vani%$4 ,b n[1 to pass f ?is consequ5ce1 7to :i* ,i "k n :at c be said71 & to enquire a little aft] ! true gr\nds ( our c]ta9ty 9 any ?+1 :i* is "h s mu* pret5d$4 #a4 ,x _c be d5y$1 t he t do? err 9 "o ?+1 may be c]ta91 t he do? n err 9 "s o!r2 because he may h suffici5t gr\nd & means = 8 n err+ 9 "o ?+1 :i* he ha? n 9 ano!r4 ,nor aga9 d5i$1 t he1 :o possibly may err1 yet 9 ! same ?+ may be c]ta91 t he do? n err1 if n neglect+ "s means1 :i* he kn[s w c]ta9ly keep him f error4 4 #aa4 #b4 ,b not)/&+ ^!3 ,?is seems also necess>y to be grant$ on ! o!r side 7& is s by le>n$ ,prote/ants17 ,t 9 :at k9d ( k soev] x be 7:e!r ( our ,s5se or ,reason1 9 :atev] ,art or ,sci5ce7 "o c nev] rightly assure himself conc]n+ 8 own k1 t he is c]ta9 ( any ?+ = a tru?1 :i* all1 or mo/ o!rs ( ! same or bett] abilities = _! cognoscitive faculties1 9 all ! same ext]nal means1 or gr\nds ( ! k !re(1 d pron\nce an error4 ,n1 z if tru? 7 n s1 ?\gh all ! ,_w oppose x2 nor _h c]ta9 gr\nds to be prov$ s1 ?\gh all ! ,_w %\ld d5y !m2 b because ! true k ( x1 & !m1 _c possibly appe> to "o mans intellect1 &1 omnibus p>ibus1 n to o!rs4 ,n[ = any disp>ity1 z to defect1 :e!r 9 ! in/rum5t1 or 9 ! means ( k1 !re1 :]e all or mo/ diff] f me1 x seems a /range pride n to imag9e ?is defect 9 my self1 r ?an !m2 especially1 99 :5as1 all ! gr\nds ( my ,sci5ce are communicat$ to !m2 & 99 :5as1 = my own mi/akes1 ,i _c "k exactly ! ext5t ( sup]natural delusions4 ,i say1 be ?is 9 :at k we please2 9 t ( s5se1 see+1 he>+1 numbr+1 or 9 any ( ,mr4 ,*ill+wor?'s =m] in/ances m5tion$1 4 #g4 ,s1 ,i c nev] rationally assure my self ( :at ,i see1 :5 m51 z well or bett] sight$1 & all ext]nal circum/ances = any ?+ ,i "k be+ ! same1 see no su* matt]4 ,& ?is is ! ,rule also propos$ by le>n$ ,prote/ants to keep e ,fanatick f plead+ c]ta9ty 9 8 own conceit4 ,see ,ar*-,bi%op ,laud 74 #cc4 ,consid4 #e4 n4 #a47----;& ,hook] 7,preface 4 #f47 _! design+ ( a cle> evid5ce1 or demon/rative argum5t1 viz4 ,su* z propos$ to any man1 & und]/ood1 ! m9d _c *use b inw>dly ass5t to x2 & !re=e1 surely1 propos$ to _m m51 ! m9d ( ! mo/ _c diss5t f x4 4 #ab4 ,consequ5tly1 9 ! ,scripture2 ab/ract+ f ! inw>d op]ations ( ,god's ,holy ,_s1 & any ext]nal infallible ,guide1 7:i* infallible ,guide ,scripture x self _c be to two m5 deliv]+ a contr>y s5se !re(37 ,i see n f :5ce any c]ta9ty c arise to p>ticul> p]sons1 = s _m ,texts or places !re(1 conc]n+ ! s5se ( :i*1 ! mo/1 or ! mo/ le>n$1 or _! ,sup]iors1 to :om also all _! motives or argum5ts are repres5t$1 d diff] f !m4 ,f ! pla9ness ( ! expression or ,grammatical con/ruction ( ! words1 su* c]ta9ty _c arise2 unless no t]m !re( c possibly be di/+ui%$1 or tak5 9 a div]se or unlit]al s5se2 b1 if x _c be s tak51 !n all ,expositors mu/ ne$s agree 9 "o & ! same s5se4 ,= ,example1 ,= ! ,lit]al & ,grammatical s5se1 :at ,text ,pla9] ?an ,hoc e/ corpus meum8 & yet ,prote/ants und]/& x o!rwise4 ,v defici5t !re=e seeme? t answ] ( ,mr4 ,*ill+wor?'s to ,f4 ,knot#bc1 urg+1 ,t ! fir/ ,re=m]s ought to h d\bt$1 :e!r _! op9ions 7 c]ta91--,:i* is to say 7answ]s he71 t !y ought to h d\bt$ ( ! c]ta9ty ( ,scripture2 :i* 9 =mal & express t]ms1 conta9s _m ( _! op9ions :5as ! great] _w ( ,ca?olicks sees no su* matt]4 ,besides1 z !re is no t]m almo/ 9 any s5t5ce1 b is capable ( sev]al acceptions2 s1 s9ce no fal%ood1 no discord is 9 ! ,scriptures1 !re is no s5t5ce 9 x1 h[ev] s\nd+ = ! expression1 b mu/ be reconcil$ 9 its s5se to all ! re/2 & = ?is a dilig5t comp>+ ( ,texts is necess>y1 to atta9 ! true mean+ ( _m places1 t seem at ! fir/ sight mo/ cle> 9 :at !y say1 b t !re are also o!r places z cle> t seem to say ! contr>y3 ,& "s su* places !y 71 7& t 9 v necess>y po9ts too7 ( :i* ,/4 ,pet] sai?2 ,t "s wre/$ !m to _! own damnation#bd3 wre/$ !m1 because !y want$ 7n indu/ry1 b7 le>n+2 :i* ! unle>n$ 7sai? he7 wre/----,& inde$ commonly ! mo/ ignorant h ! /ronglie/-conceit$ c]ta9ty = :at !y appreh5d or believe1 because !y "k fewe/ reasons aga9/ x2 :il/1 by mu* /udy & comp>+ sev]al ,revelations "o ) ano!r1 ^? come at la/ to d\bt1 or d5y t s5se ( "s ( !m1 :i* at ! fir/ !y took = mo/ c]ta9ly & evid5tly true4 ,p>don ?is long ,p>5!sis4 #a p4 #bc1 #aei1 #cfg4 #b ,*ill4 p4 #hg4 #c ,*ill4 p4 #ah4 #d ,*ill4 ,ib4 #e ,*ill4 p4 #ai4 #f ,*ill+w4 p4 #ajb4 #g ,*ill4 p4 #ah1 #ib4 #h ,*ill4 p4 #ib4 #i ,*ill4 p4 #ei4 #aj ,*ill+w4 p4 #aaa4 #aa ,ib4 p4 #aab4 #ab ,ib4 p4 #aag4 #ac ,ib4 p4 #aab4 #ad ,see also ,*ill4 p4 #adj1 #cff1 #cfg4 #ae #a ,joh4 #e4 #bj4 #af ,s4 ,hi]on4 de viris illu/4 #ag ,s]m4 at ,:itehall1 ,m>* #ab4 #affd4 p4 #ag4 #ah ,dr4 ,f]ne1 ,division ( ,*ur*es1 p4 #df1 #fa4 ,*ill9w4 p4 #eg4 #ai ,/ill+fl4 p4 #a1 #c4 #bj ,*ill9w4 p4 #ei1 #ajj4 #ba p4 #adj4 #bb p4 #aah4 #adj4 #aff4 #bc ,*ill+w4 p4 #cjg4 #bd #b ,pet4 #c4 #af4 ,,conf]5ce ,,ii4 ,! ,soc9ians ,prote/ant-,plea1 ,= 8 n hold+ any ?+ contr>y to ! unanim\s s5se ( ! ,ca?olick ,*ur*1 s f> z ?is c ju/ly oblige4 #a/4 ,t an unanim\s ,cons5t ( ! :ole ,ca?olick ,*ur* 9 all ages1 su* z ! ,prote/ants require = ! prov+ ( a po9t ( fai? to be necess>y1 c nev] be %ew$1 conc]n+ ?is po9t ( ,consub/antiality4 4 #ad4 ,& t ! cons5t1 to su* a doctr9e ( ! major "p is no argum5t suffici5t1 s9ce ! ,prote/ants d5y ! l cons5t valid = sev]al o!r po9ts4 4 #ad4 #b4 ,t suppos+ an unanim\s cons5t ( ! ,*ur* ,ca?olick ( all ages 9 ?is po9t1 yet f h5ce a ,*ri/ian ha? no security ( ! tru? !re( accord+ to ,prote/ant ,pr9ciples1 if ?is po9t1 7:e!r way soev] held7 be a non-necess>y2 = t 9 su*1 x is said ! :ole ,*ur* may err4 4 #ae4 #c4 ,t ?is ,article's be+ 9 ! affirmative1 put 9 ! ,cre$ proves x n 7z to ! affirmative7 a ,necess>y4 4 #af4 #a/4 ,because n orig9ally 9 ! ,cre$1 b add$ by a ,c\ncil2 to :i* ,cre$ if "o ,c\ncil may add1 s may ano!r ( equal au?ority 9 any age1 :atev] re/ra9t be made by a =m] ,c\ncil4 #b4 ,because sev]al ,articles ( ! latt] ,cre$s are affirm$ by ,prote/ants n necess>y to be believ$1 b ^u a previ\s conviction1 t !y are div9e revelation4 4 #af4 #d4 ,la/ly4 ,t ?\gh ! :ole ,*ur* deliv]s = tru? 9 any po9t1 ! contr>y to t he holds1 he is n oblig$ to resign 8 judgm5t to h]'s1 except conditionally1 & ) ?is res]vation1 unless on ! o!r side1 !re appe> evid5ce to him 9 ,god's ,^w4 ,n[1 ( ! evid5ce ( ,scripture 9 ?is po9t on 8 side1 t he ha? no d\bt4 4 #ag4 4 #ac4 #b4 ,n[ to resume ! ,conf]5ce4 ,! ,prote/ant1 bett] ?9k+ on x1 w n leave ! ,soc9ian ?us at re/ 9 ?is pl]ophory ( 8 own s5se ( ,scripture1 b ?us proce$s4 ,prot4 ,scriptures inde$ are n s cle> & p]spicu\s to e "o#be z t ,art & subtilty may n be us$ to p]v]t ! ,ca?olick doctr9e1 & to wre/ ! pla9 places ( ,scripture :i* deliv] x1 s f> f _! prop] mean+1 t v few ord9>y capacities may be able to cle> !mselves ( su* mi/s z are ca/ be=e _! eyes1 ev5 9 ! great ,articles ( ! ,*ri/ian fai?4 ,!re=e :y d n y submit y\r judgm5t1 & ass5t to ! s5se ( ,scripture1 9 ?is po9t unanim\sly deliv]$ by ! cons5t ( ! ,ca?olick ,*ur*2 :i* also is believ$ always un]rable 9 any necess>y po9t ( fai?1 z ?is is8 ,soc4 ,fir/1 ,if y c %ew me an unanim\s cons5t ( ! ,*ur* ,ca?olick ( all ages 9 ?is po9t1 & t z held necess>y1 ,i w will+ly submit to x4 ,b ?is y c nev] d accord+ to su* a pro( !re(1 z is requir$1 viz4 #bf,t all ,ca?olick ,writ]s agree 9 ! belief ( x2 & none ( !m oppose x3 & agree also 9 ! belief ( ! necessity ( x to all ,*ri/ians4 99 ,t no lat] ,writ]s & ,fa!rs1 9 opposition ( ,h]eticks1 or heats ( cont5tion1 judg$ !n ! ,article s oppos$ to be m necess>y ?an x 0 judg$ be=e ! cont5tion4 99 ,t all ,writ]s1 t give an acc\nt ( ! fai? ( ,*ri/ians1 deliv] x2 ,& deliv] x n z necess>y to be believ$ by su* z might be conv9c$ t x is ( div9e ,revelation1 b ) a necessity ( its be+ explicitely believ$ by all#bg4 ,n[1 no su* unanim\s cons5t c be pret5d$ = ! =em5tion$ ,consub/antiality4 ,=1 n to speak ( ! times next foll[+ ! ,c\ncil ( ,nice1 nor yet ( sev]al expressions 9 ! ,anci5ts1 ,ju/9 ,m>tyr1 ,ir5u1 ,t]tullian1 ,clem5s ,alex&r9us1 ,orig51 t seem to fav\r our op9ion#bh3 ,nor1 ( ^? ,ea/]n ,bi%ops1 :i* ,arrius1 9 8 ,lett] to ,eusebius ,nicom$4#bi 7numb]s on 8 side17 ,hil>ius#cj relates no less ?an ,eighty ,bi%ops be=e t ,c\ncil1 to h disall[$ ! reception ( ! ^w hom\sios2 & 9 ! ,c\ncil also ,sev5te51 7"s ( note7 at fir/ to h diss5t$ f ! re/4 4 #ad4 ,prot4 ,n yeild+ :at y say = tru?2 b = ! pres5t1 suppos+ x2 yet ! ,judgm5t ( s small a p>ty may by no means be adh]$ to by y1 x be+ inconsid]able 9 respect ( ! :ole ,body ( ! ,ca?olick ,*ur* decl>+ aga9/ y4 ,soc4 ,if ! cons5t ( ! mu* major "p is to be tak5 = ! :ole1 !n ! ,re=m$ _c ma9ta9 _! diss5t f ! mu* m num]\s body ( ,*ri/ianity1 t oppos$ _! op9ions1 & s5se ( ,scriptures at ! beg9n+ ( ! ,re=mation1 & d /ill oppose !m4 ,b n to /& ^u ?is1 ,i w\ld will+ly con=m to ! unanim\s1 or mo/ g5]al judgm5t ( ! ,*ur* ,ca?olick2 if ,i 7 secure t %e c\ld n be mi/ak5 9 x4 ,b #ca,! s5se ( ! ,*ur* ,ca?olick is no infallible rule ( int]pret+ ,scripture 9 all ?+s :i* conc]n ! ,rule ( ,fai?--#cb,nor may %e usurp t royal ,pr]ogative ( ,heav51 9 prescrib+ infallibly 9 matt]s que/ion$4 ,prot4 ,y may be secure1 t %e nev] erre? 9 any po9t necess>y4 ,soc4 ,b y tell me1 t ?\gh %e nev] err 9 necess>ies1 yet x foll[s n1 t %e is an un]r+ ,guide or ,witness !re9#cc or1 t %e mu/ un]r+ly decl>e :at po9ts are necess>y & :at n2 & ,i mu/ fir/ le>n1 :e!r ?is po9t ( ,consub/antiality is to be numbr$ among necess>ies1 be=e ,i c be assur$1 t ! s5se ( ! ,*ur* ,ca?olick errs n !re94 4 #ae4 ,prot4 ,b #cd;,x is a suffici5t prescription aga9/ any ?+ :i* c be all$g$ out ( ,scripture1 t x ought n to be look$ on z ! true mean+ ( ,scripture1 if x appe> contr>y to ! s5se ( ! ,*ur* ,ca?olick f ! beg9n+2 & !re=e su* doctr9es may well be judg$ de/ructive to ! rule ( ,fai?1 :i* h be5 s unanim\sly condemn$ by ! ,*ur* ,ca?olick4 ,soc4 ,:y s8 ,prot4 #ce;,because no?+ contr>y to ! necess>y ,articles ( ,fai? c be s held by ! ,ca?olick ,*ur*2 = its v ,be+ dep5ds on its belief ( necess>ies to salvation4 ,soc4 ,?is la/ is mo/ true2 b !n1 if y mean to make y\r disc\rse coh]e1 y mu/ say1 x is a suffici5t prescription1 c4 if x appe> contr>y to ! s5se ( ! ,ca?olick ,*ur*1 viz4 9 a po9t necess>y3 =1 ! reason y give c>ries1 & secures y no fur!r2 & !n t :i* y say is no great matt]3 ,=1 "h we are /ill to seek1 :e!r ! po9t we disc\rse ( is 9 ! affirmative su* a necess>y4 4 #af4 ,prot4 ,b ?is is rank$ among ^? po9ts :i* ! ,*ur* ha? put 9 h] ,cre$s4 ,soc4 ,f ! beg9n+ ?is ,article 0 n 9 ! ,cre$2 & ?\gh x %\ld be grant$ t all po9ts necess>y are conta9$ 9 ! ,cre$s1 yet all 9 ! ,cre$s are n ?\ght po9ts necess>y3 #cf,necess>y s1 z to be believ$ by any be=e a cle> conviction ( ! div9e ,revelation !re(3 :i* conviction ,i yet want4 4 #ag4 ,prot4 ,b yet1 ?\gh1 fir/ ! ,ca?olick ,*ur* may err 9 non-necess>ies2 ,& #bly4 9 :at po9ts are necess>y1 :at n1 h] judgm5t be n infallible1 yet y h /ill great reason to submit y\r judgm5t to h]s2 because1 if x happ5 to be a po9t necess>y1 %e is f ! div9e ,promise infallible & un]r+ 9 x2 n s1 y4 #b4 ,if n necess>y1 & s bo? %e & y !re9 liable to error1 yet y mu* ! m2 & %e also 9 ^! ?+s is appo9t$ by ,god = y\r ,tea*] & ,guide4 ,soc4 ,!re=e ,i use ! help & direction ( my spiritual ,guides2 consid] _! reasons2 d n ra%ly dep>t f _! judgm5t2 b yet #cg,! due submission ( my ass5t1 & belief to !m is only to be conditional1 ) res]vation ( evid5ce 9 ,god's ,^w4 ,= 9 matt] ( fai? 7z ,dr4 ,f]ne sai?7 ,i _c submit to any company ( m5 by resignation ( my judgm5t & belief to receive = fai? all t !y %all def9e1 = su* resignation /&s exclud$ by ! condition ( ! au?ority :i* is n infallible2 & by ! condition ( ! matt]1 fai?1 ( high conc]nm5t to our own s\ls1 & to be acc\nt$ = by our selves3 :o !re=e /& b\nd to make pres5t1 & dilig5t se>* = t evid5ce & demon/ration f ,god's ,^w1 ^u :i* we may f9ally & securely /ay our belief----,& #ch,! ,*ur* det]m9+ matt] ( fai? 7sai? he7 ought to manife/ x out ( ,god's ,^w3 & we may expect su* ,*ur*es1 pro(1 be=e we yield absolute ass5t ( belief4 ,& s ,dr4 ,/ill+fleet sai?#ci----;,all m5 ought to be left to judge accord+ to ! ,p&ects ( ! div9e ,laws1 because ea* memb] ( ?is ,society is b\nd to take c>e ( 8 ,s\l1 & ( all ?+s t t5d !reto4 ,n[ ,i = my "p see no solid gr\nd out ( ! ,scripture = ,consub/antiality1 b r = ! contr>y2 :i* sev]al ( our ,writ]s h made appe> to ! _w4 ,& !re=e unless ! ,*ur* 7 ei!r infallible 9 all %e det]m9$1 or at lea/ 9 di/+ui%+ ^? necess>ies :]e9 %e _c err f ! re/1 x seems no way ju/ifiable1 t %e puts ?is h] def9ition into ! ,cre$2 %e1 z ,i conceive1 ?us requir+ f all an absolute cons5t !reto2 & n only 7z "s#dj w\ld p]swade me7 a conditional = "s ( !m1 viz4 :5ev] ,i %all be cle>ly conv9c$1 t su* po9t is ( div9e ,revelation4 #be ,/ill+fl4 p4 #eh1 #ei4 #bf ,/ill+fl4 p4 #gb4 #bg ,see be=e ,dis4 #c4 4 #eb4 #bh ,see ,petavius 9 ,epipha4 ,hr4 #fi4 #bi ,apud ,epipha4 ,hr4 #fi4--,!odor4 l4 #a4 c4 #e4 #cj ,de ,synod4 #ca ,/ill4 p4 #ei4 #cb ,/ill+fl4 p4 #acc4 #cc ,/ill+4 p4 #aed1 #aeb4--;,*ill+w4 p4 #aej4--;,dr4 ,hammond1 ,def5ce ( ! ,"l ,falkl4 p4 #bc4 #cd ,/ill+fl4 p4 #ei4 #ce ,/ill+4 ib4 #cf ,/ill+fl4 p4 #gj1 #ga4 #cg ,dr4 ,f]ne1 ,consid]ations1 p4 #aj4 #ch ,! ,case betwe5 ! ,*ur*es1 p4 #dj4 #ci p4 #acc4 #dj ,/ill4 p4 #gj4 ,,conf]5ce ,,iii4 ,8 ,plea1 = 8 n hold+ any ?+ contr>y to ! ,def9itions ( lawful ,g5]al ,c\ncils1 ! j conditions !re( obs]v$4 ,t he conceives he ows no ob$i5ce to ! ,c\ncil ( ,nice4 #a4 ,because ?is _c be prov$ to h be5 a lawful ,g5]al ,c\ncil ) s mu* c]ta9ty1 z is necess>y = ! gr\nd ( 8 ,fai?1 z appe>s by ^? _m que/ions m5tion$ by ,mr4 ,*ill+wor?1 ,/ill+fleet1 & o!r ,prote/ants1 :]e9 he mu/ fir/ be satisfi$1 conc]n+ x4 #b4 ,because1 ?\gh x 7 a ,g5]al ,c\ncil1 yet x might err ev5 9 necess>ies1 if x 7 n univ]sally accept$2 z he c %ew x 0 n4 #c4 ,t1 ?\gh yield$ to be g5]ally accept$1 x might err /ill 9 non-necess>ies2 & t ,prote/ants _c prove ?is po9t to be o!rwise4 #d4 ,t ! ,lead]s ( ?is ,c\ncil 7 pla9ly a p>ty conte/+ ?is1 = _m ye>s be=e1 ) ! o!r side condemn$ by !m2 & 7 ,judges 9 _! own cause4 #e4 ,all ^! exceptions cancell$1 & ,ob$i5ce grant$ due to ?is ,c\ncil2 yet1 t s1 !re is due to x n t ( ass5t1 b only ( sil5ce4 4 #ai4 #f4 ,b yet n t ( sil5ce nei!r f him2 consid]+ 8 pres5t p]swasion1 t inde$ ! affirmative 9 ?is po9t is an error manife/ & intol]able3 conc]n+ :i* matt] 8 p>ty hav+ long compla9$ to _! ,sup]iors1 & produc$ suffici5t evid5ce2 yet ^! h proce$$ to no r$ress ( x4 4 #bj4 #g4 ,b yet t he w submit to ! ,judgm5t ( a future ,c\ncil1 if x1 rightly consid]+ ! reasons ( 8 t55t1 decree t :i* is accord+ to ,god's ,^w1 & he be conv9c$ !re(4 4 #bb4 4 #ah4 #c4 ,prot4 ,b d y n consid] by :at p]sons ?is ,article 0 long ago ins]t$ into ! ,cre$3 ,namely1 by ! fir/ ,g5]al1 & ! mo/ v5]able ,assembly ( ! ,fa!rs ( ! ,*ur* t ha? be5 conv5$ s9ce ! ,apo/les times2 celebrat$ "u ! fir/ ,*ri/ian ,emp]or by a p]fect ,repres5tative ( ! ,ca?olick ,*ur*2 & by su* p]sons1 z came v mu* purifi$ out ( ! newly-qu5*$ fire ( ! greate/ p]secution t ! ,*ur* ha? suff]$1 t "u ,dioclesian2 w n y !n at lea/ submit y\r judgm5t to ! ,decree ( ?is great & ,holy ,c\ncil2 "o & ! fir/ ( ^? f\r :i* ,/4 ,gregory said he receiv$ ) ! same rev]5ce1 z ! f\r ,gospels8 ,soc4 ,no1 ,& = ?is ,i %all give y 9 brief _m reasons1 z ,i conceive satisfactory4 ,= #a4 ,_h ,i an obligation ( submission ( judgm5t to lawful ,g5]al ,c\ncils1 y _c prove ?is su* a "o1 & ^? ! decrees !re( :i* are n[ extant1 ) su* a c]ta9ty z is necess>y to build !reon an ,article ( my ,fai?4 ,= to prove ?is1 y mu/ satisfie me 9 all ^? ?+s que/ion$ conc]n+ ,g5]al ,c\ncils 99 by ,m4 ,*ill+wor?1 p4 #id4 99 ,by ,dr4 ,pi]ce 9 8 answ] to ,mr4 ,cressy1 p4 #ah4 c4 99 ,by ,mr4 ,:itby f p4 #dbh4 to p4 #dcc4 :]e he concludes3 #a4 ,t we nev] _h a ,g5]al ,c\ncil4 #b4 ,t a ,g5]al ,c\ncil is a ?+ impossible4 99 ,by ,mr4 ,/ill+fleet p4 #ejh4 c4----#die4 #aai4 #abc4 c4 ,:o also1 aga9/ ! be+ ( su* a ,g5]al ,c\ncil z is ! ,repres5tative ( ! :ole ,*ur* ,ca?olick1 ?us disputes#da----,! repres5tation ( a ,*ur* 7sai? he7 by a ,g5]al ,c\ncil1 is a ?+ n s evid5t1 f :5ce x %\ld come3 = if su* repres5tative ( ! :ole ,*ur* !re be1 x mu/ ei!r be s by "s =mal act ( ! ,*ur*1 or by a tacite cons5t4 ,x c\ld n be by any =mal act ( ! ,*ur*2 = !n !re mu/ be "s su* act ( ! univ]sal ,*ur* prec$+ ! be+ ( any ,g5]al ,c\ncil1 by :i* !y receive _! ,commission to appe> 9 behalf ( ! univ]sal ,*ur*4 ,n[ t ! univ]sal ,*ur* did ev] agree 9 any su* act is utt]ly impossible to be demon/rat$1 ei!r t x c\ld be1 or t x 04 ,b if x be said1 t su* a =mal act is n necess>y1 b ! tacite cons5t ( ! :ole ,*ur* is suffici5t = x2 !n su* a cons5t ( ! ,*ur* mu/ be made evid5t1 by :i*1 !y did devolve ov] ! p[] ( ! :ole ,*ur* to su* a ,repres5tative4 ,& all ^! mu/ cons5t 9 t act ^: p[] ! ,c\ncil pret5ds to h2 ( :i* no foot/eps appe>----,! utmo/ !n 7sai? he7 t c be suppos$ 9 ?is case1 is1 t ! p>ts ( ! ,*ur* may volunt>ily cons5t to accept ( ! decrees ( su* a ,c\ncil2 & by t volunt>y act1 or by ! supreme au?ority enjoyn+ x1 su* decrees may become obligatory4 ,?us he4 ,b ,i suppose its ,decrees obligatory !n only to ^? p>ts ( ! ,*ur* t volunt>ily cons5t to accept ( !m1 z ! ,arians did n to receive ! ,decrees ( ,nice4 ,la/ly1 by 99 ,bi%op ,taylor 9 ! #b;d4 ,"p ( 8 ,disswasive1 l4 #a4 4 #a4 p4 #bi4 c4 to ! end ( ! ,section4 ,:]e p4 #ca4 he sai? conc]n+ ?is ( ,nice1 t makes = y1 comp>$ ) t ( ,arim9um1 :i* makes = u----,t if a ,ca?olick produc+ ! ,nic5e ,c\ncil be r5c\ntr$ by an ,arian produc+ ! ,c\ncil ( ,arim9ium :i* 0 f> m num]\s1 "h are aquilis aquil pila m9antia pilis3 b :o %all prevail8 ,if a ,g5]al ,c\ncil be ! rule & guide1 !y w bo? prevail1 t is1 nei!r4 ,& x ought n to be said by ! ,ca?olick2 ,yea1 b our ,c\ncil det]m9$ = ! tru?2 b y\rs = error3 ,=1 ! ,arian w say s too4 ,b1 :e!r !y d or no1 yet x is pla9 t !y may bo? say s3 & if !y d1 !n we d n f9d ! tru? out by ! conduct & decision ( a ,g5]al ,c\ncil2 b we approve ?is ,g5]al1 because ^u o!r acc\nts we believe t :at is !re def9$ is true4 ,& !re=e ,s4 ,au/9's way "h is be/1 ,neque ego ,nicnum ,concilium1 neque tu ,arim95se1 c4 bo? sides pret5d to ,g5]al ,c\ncils3 t :i* bo? equally pret5d to1 w help nei!r2 !re=e let u g to ,scripture4 ,& p4 #cb4----,:at is ! reason 7sai? he ( ,c\ncils 9 ,g5]al7 t "s ,c\ncils are p>tly condemn$3 ! ,c\ncil ( ,s>dis1 t 9 ,trullo1 ^? ( ,frank=d1 ,con/ance1 & ,basil8 b t e man & e ,*ur* accepts ! ,c\ncils z f> z !y please1 & no fur!r8 ,! ,greeks receive b sev5 ,g5]al ,c\ncils1 ! ,lu!rans six1 ! ,euty*ians ?ree1 ,ne/orians two1 c4----,pro captu lectoris hab5t sua fata4 ,x is z e "o likes4 ,i sp>e to tell y :at he sai?1 p4 #bf4--,t 9 ! fir/ ,g5]al ,c\ncil ( ,j]usalem1 :i* 0 ! fir/ prec$5t1 & ought to be ! true measure ( ! re/1 ! ,apo/les 7 ! ,presid5ts1 & ! ,presbyt]s ,assi/ants1 b ! ,*ur* viz4 ! conv]t$ bre?r5 & ! ,laity1 see p4 #cf4 0 ! ,body ( ! ,c\ncil1 & 7 ,p>ties 9 ! ,decree1 quot+ ,acts #ae1 #bb1 #bc4 & t we c h no o!r w>rant ( an au!ntick ,c\ncil ?an ?is4 #b4 ,?\gh x be %ew$ a lawful ,g5]al ,c\ncil1 repres5t+ ! :ole ,*ur* 7z x ought1 if su*7 yet :at obligation c !re lye ^u me ( cons5t+ to x8 s9ce x may err ev5 9 ,fundam5tals1 if x be n univ]sally accept$1 z inde$ ?is ,c\ncil 0 n1 = sev]al ,bi%ops !re 71 t 7 diss5t]s 9 ! ,c\ncil1 & _m m aft]w>d4#db #c4 ,7 x univ]sally accept$2 yet unless y c %ew me by "s means1 t ?is po9t :]e9 ,i diff] f its judgm5t1 is a fundam5tal or necess>y po9t to salvation1 bo? x1 & ! ,ca?olick ,*ur* also t accepts x may err !re94 #d4 ,! judgm5t ( ?is ,c\ncil seems ju/ly decl9able also on ?is acc\nt4 ,t :]eas ! ,guides ( ! ,*ur*1 _m ye>s be=e ?is ,c\ncil 7 divid$ 9 _! op9ion1 ,alex&] ,patri>* ( ,alex&ria1 & ,hosius a ,favorite ( ! ,emp]or head+ "o p>ty2 & ,arius & ! ,bi%ops adh]+ to him1 :om ,i m5tion$ =m]ly#dc1 head+ ano!r1 & :]eas aft]w>d1 9 ! prosecution ( ?is diff]5ce1 bo? ! =esaid ,alex&] 9 "o ,prov9cial ,c\ncil held 9 ,egypt1 & ,hosius s5t ?i!r by ! ,emp]or 9 ano!r1 _h !re condemn$ ,arius1 & 8 ,conf$]ates2 yet s x 0 ord]$1 t 9 ?is ,g5]al ,c\ncil assembl$ = an equal he>+ & decision ( ?is ,controv]sie ( ^! two pr(ess$ ,enemies to ! o!r p>ty1 ! "o 7,hosius7 0 appo9t$ to sit z ,presid5t ( ?is ,c\ncil2 & ! o!r 7,alex&]7 held 9 x ! next place to him2 & poor ,arius exclud$2 & ! ,bi%ops :o fav\r$ him 9 ! ,c\ncil1 ?\gh at fir/ freely decl>+ _! diss5t1 yet at la/ ov]-aw$ to a subscription2 z also 0 ,arius himself *iefly by ! ,emp]or ,con/ant9e's ov]be>+ au?ority2 :o1 be=e some:at indiff]5t 9 ! conte/1 yet ^u ,arius 8 undutiful & too p]emptory ,lett]s1 _h "s ye>s be=e tak5 great (f5ce at him2 & also 7z he 0 v eloqu5t7 publickly writt5 aga9/ him#dd4 ,:i* ov]aw+ h5ce appe>s1 9 t ! same ,bi%ops t 7 adh]5ts to ,arius1 :51 ?is ,emp]or be+ deceas$1 ,con/antius 8 ,son c\nt5anc$ _! ,cause1 return$1 ,i say n to _! =m] ,op9ion only1 b to _! publick pr(ession ( x4 ,by :i* we may guess1 t if ! ,controv]sie _h at t "t be5 committ$ to equal & dis5gag$ ,judges1 & su* z _h n =m]ly %ew$ !mselves a ,p>ty2 or1 if ! ,ori5tal ,bi%ops1 )\t any fe> ( ! ,pr9ce ^u !m1 might h giv5 free ,votes2 & ! ,arian ,cause _h !n _h a ,con/antius in/ead ( a ,con/ant9e1 7?+s :]e9 ,prote/ants well und]/& me1 because on ! same ,gr\nds !y h reject$ ! ,c\ncil ( ,tr5t7 we may presume !n ! issue w\ld h be5 "u ,con/ant9e ! same t x 0 "u 8 ,successor1 ,i say be=e ,judges equal & indiff]5t1 & n su* z 7 be=e a ,p>ty1 ?\gh ?is ,p>ty %\ld be comp\nd$ ( ! *ief ,sup]ior ,prelates ( ! ,*ur*4 ,=1 z ,dr4 ,/ill+fleet urge?1 #de----,we mu/ ei!r absolutely1 & r\ndly ass]t1 t x is impossible t ! ,sup]iors 9 ! ,*ur* may be guilty ( any error or corruption2 or1 t if !y be1 !y mu/ nev] be call$ to an acc\nt = x2 or else1 t x may be j1 9 "s ,cases1 to except aga9/ !m z ,p>ties3 ,& if 9 "s ,cases1 !n ! ,"q comes to ?is1 ,:e!r ! pres5t he speaks ( ,idolatry1 ,i ( ,consub/antiality be "s ( ^! ,cases or no8 ,& "h if we make ^? ,sup]iors ,judges aga91 :at we grant$ be=e comes to no?+4 ,prot4 ,no ,p]son t is appo9t$ by our ,"l to be a ,judge 9 any ,controv]sie 7z ^? ,bi%ops y h m5tion$ 7 9 ! ,cause ( ,arius7 c rightly or prop]ly be said to be1 on t ,side = :i* he gives ,s5t5ce1 a ,p>ty4 ,nor do? _! giv+ ,s5t5ce once aga9/ any ,side1 prejudice !m 7z suppos$ ,enemies1 or ,opposites1 or ,int]e/$7 f sitt+ on ! ,b5*1 z (t z ne$ requires1 to pass x aga91 alone1 or ) o!rs4 ,b1 if e "o may be aft]w>d call$ an ,anti-p>ty1 :o once decl>es himself ( a contr>y ,judgm5t1 ,i p]ceive ,mr4 ,*ill+wor?'s ,obs]vation is "r1 #df,t1 9 ,controv]sies 9 ,religion1 x is 9 a mann] impossible to be avoid$1 b ! ,judge mu/ be a ,p>ty4 ,i add also1 ,t 9 ,matt]s ( ,religion1 :]e e ,man is conc]n$1 & 9 great ,controv]sies1 especially :]e is any division ( ,communion1 all1 bo? ,laity & ,cl]gy1 spe$ily own1 & range !mselves on "o side or o!r2 ,cl]gy int]ess+ !mselves = ! necess>y direction ( _! ,subjects2 ,laity1 9 ob$i5ce to _! ,sup]iors2 nei!r c su* a ,judge be nom9at$1 t is n to "o side suspect$4 ,s t1 9 ,controv]sies ( ,religion1 we mu/ d5y any ,judge 7z he did#dg72 or ?is ,plea1 ,t ! ord9>y ,judge1 t is assign$ u1 is a ,p>ty1 mu/ n be easily he>k5$ to4 ,z = t y urge out ( ,bi%op ,taylor1 conc]n+ ! ,laity 9 ! fir/ ,c\ncil at ,j]usalem 7! ,patt]n to all foll[+7 be+ ,p>ties 9 ! ,decree1 ,i suppose x is meant no fur!r1 ?an t also ^! may assi/ 9 ! ,c\ncil1 & give !re a cons5ti5t1 or atte/+1 b n a decisive ,vote3 :i* nei!r did ! ,emp]ors claim1 :5 !y presid$ !re94 ,see ,dr4 ,field ( ! ,*ur*1 p4 #fdf4 4 #ai4 ,soc4 ,b ,i h n yet said all4 ,= ,fif?ly1 ,7 !re none ( ! =5am$ defects 9 x1 #dh,no ,au?ority on ,e>? c oblige to int]nal ass5t 9 matt]s ( ,fai?1 or to any f>!r ,ob$i5ce ?an t ( ,sil5ce4 ,prot4 ,yes1 y /& oblig$ to yield a conditional ass5t1 at lea/ to ! ,def9itions ( ^! highe/ ,c\rts1 i4 e4 unless y c br+ evid5t ,scripture1 or ,demon/ration aga9/ !m4 ,soc4 ,i d n ?9k ,prote/ant ,div9es agree 9 ?is4 ,i f9d inde$ ! ,ar*bi%op#di requir+ ,evid5ce & ,demon/ration1 = ,inf]iors contradict+1 or publi%+ _! diss5t f ! ,c\ncils ,decrees1 b n requir+ ?us mu* = _! d5ial ( ass5t4 ,& ,i am told1 #ej--,t 9 matt]s propos$ by my ,sup]iors1 z ,god's ,^w1 & ( ,fai?1 ,i am n ti$ to believe x su*1 till !y manife/ x to me to be s2 & n t ,i am to believe x su*1 unless ,i c manife/ x to be contr>y1 because my ,fai? c re/ on no ,humane ,au?ority1 b only on ,god's ,^w1 & ,div9e ,revelation4 ,& ,dr4 ,field sai?1--#ea;,x is n necess>y expresly to believe1 :atsoev] ! ,c\ncil ha? conclud$1 ?\gh x be true1 unless by "s o!r means x appe> unto u to be true1 & we be conv9c$ ( x 9 "s o!r sort ?an by ! b>e ,det]m9ation ( ! ,c\ncil4 ,till ,i am conv9c$ !n ( my ,error1 ! ,ob$i5ce ( ,sil5ce is ! mo/ t c be requir$ ( me4 4 #bj ,b six?ly1 ,i conceive my self 9 ?is po9t n oblig$ to ?is nei!r2 consid]+ my pres5t p]suasion1 t ?is ,c\ncil manife/ly err$2 & t1 9 an error ( su* high consequ5ce 7conc]n+ ! unity ( ! mo/ high ,god7 z is no way to be tol]at$2 & ,i want n evid5t ,scriptures1 & _m o!r unansw]able ,demon/rations1 to %ew x did s2 & !re=e be+ admitt$ into ! hon\rable ,function ( ! ,m9i/ry1 ,i conceive ,i h a lawful ,commission f an high] ,au?ority1 to publi% ?is great ,tru? ( ,god1 & to contradict ! ,c\ncils ,decree4 4 #ba4 ,prot4 ,b y may easily mi/ake t = evid5t ,scripture1 & ^? = ,demon/rations1 t are n4 ,conc]n+ :i* y "k :at ! ,ar*bi%op & ,mr4 ,hook] say#eb----,t !y are su*1 z propos$ to any man1 & und]/ood1 ! m9d _c *use b inw>dly ass5t to !m#ec4 ,y ought !re=e fir/ to propose ^! to y\r ,sup]iors1 or to ! ,*ur*1 desir+ a r$ress ( su* ,error by h] call+ ano!r ,c\ncil4 ,&1 if ^! ,sup]iors1 acqua9t$ !re)1 dislike y\r ,demon/rations1 :i* ! ,def9ition sai?1 if !y be "r ones1 !y mu/ be by all1 & !re=e by !m1 ass5t$ to1 me?9ks1 7?\gh ?is is n said by ! ,ar*bi%op7 9 humility y ought also to suspect ^! ,demon/rations1 & rema9 9 sil5ce at lea/1 & no fur!r tr\ble ! ,*ur*4 ,soc4 ,may !re=e no p>ticul> ,p]son1 or ,*ur*1 proce$ to a ,re=mation ( a =m] ,doctr9e1 if ^! ,sup]iors1 fir/ compla9$ to1 decl>e ! ,gr\nds ( su* ,p]sons or ,*ur*es = x1 n suffici5t8 ,prot4 ,i mu/ n say s4 ,b if !y neglect 7z !y may7 to consid] _! j ,reasons s dilig5tly z !y ought1 & to call a ,c\ncil = ! ,correct+ ( su* ,error accord+ to ! weight ( ^! ,reasons1 !n "h is place = ,inf]iors to proce$ to a re=mation ( su* ,error )\t !m4 ,soc4 ,& :o !n %all judge1 :e!r ! ,reasons pret5d$ are defective1 or r ! pres5t ,*ur* neglig5t 9 consid]+ !m8 ,prot4 ,"h1 ,i confess1 to make ! ,sup]iors ,judges ( ?is1 is to ca/ ! ,pla9tiff be=e t any ,c\ncil %all he> 8 ,grievance1 ^! ,sup]iors1 ^: ,fai? appe>s to adh]e to ! =m] ,c\ncil1 be+ only ,judges 9 _! own ,cause2 & s ! lib]ty ( compla9+ w come to no?+#ed4 ,soc4 ,! ,inf]iors !n1 t compla91 ,i suppose are to judge ( ?is4 ,to proce$ !n4 ,to ^! ,sup]iors1 9 _m dilig5t ,writ+s1 we h propos$1 z we ?9k1 _m unansw]able ,scriptures1 & ,reasons mu* advanc$ beyond ^? repres5t$ by our ,p>ty to ! =m] ,nic5e ,c\ncil 7& !re=e f :i* ,evid5ces ( ours we h j cause to hope f a future ,c\ncil a contr>y ,s5t5ce72 & f9d+ no r$ress by _! call+ ano!r ,c\ncil = a review+ ?is ,po9t1 we _c b conceive x z lawful = a ,soc9ian ,*ur*1 ,pa/or1 or ,bi%op1 to re=m = !mselves1 & ! ,s\ls committ$ to !m1 9 an ,error appe>+ to !m manife/ & intol]able1 z = ! ,prote/ants1 or = ,dr4 ,lu!r1 to h done ! same = ,transub/antiation1 ,sacrifice ( ! ,mass1 & o!r ,po9ts t h be5 conclud$1 aga9/ ! ,tru?1 by sev]al =m] ,c\ncils4 ,prot4 ,b su* 7 n lawful ,g5]al ,c\ncils1 z t ( ,nice 04 ,soc4 ,:atev] ^! ,c\ncils 71 ?is mu* matt]s n1 z to a re=mation f !m2 =1 _h !y be5 lawfully ,g5]al1 yet ,prote/ants hold#ee1 ^! n univ]sally accept$ may err ev5 9 ,fundam5tals2 or1 :5 s accept$1 yet may err 9 ,non-fundam5tals2 ,errors manife/1 & intol]able1 & s may be appeal$ f to future2 & ^? n call$1 _! ,error pres5tly rectifi$ by su* ,p>ts ( ,*ri/ianity z disc]n x2 & also ,s4 ,au/9#ef is frequ5tly quot$ by !m1 say+----,t pa/ ,g5]al ,c\ncils err+1 may be correct$ by o!r ,c\ncils foll[+4 4 #bb4 ,prot4 ,b ,i pray y consid]1 if t fam\s ,c\ncil ( ,nice ha? s err$1 ano!r ,c\ncil call$1 may x also n err1 not)/&+ y\r ,evid5ces propos$ to x8 ,=1 ?\gh p]haps "s new demon/rative ,pro(s y may pret5d f sev]al ,texts m accurately comp>$ & expla9$2 yet y w n d5y ?is suffici5t ,evid5ce to h be5 extant = t mo/ ,le>n$ ,c\ncil to h se5 ! ,tru?1 hav+ !n ! same entire ,rule ( ,fai? z y n[1 ! ,scriptures1 79 :i*1 y say1 y\r cle>e/ ,evid5ces lie7 = _! direction4 ,:5 a ,future ,c\ncil 7!n7 is assembl$1 & ha? he>d y\r ,plea1 w y ass5t to x1 & acquiesce 9 ! ,judgm5t !re(8 ,soc4 ,yes1 int]pos+ ! ,prote/ant-,conditions ( ,ass5t1 ,if its ,decree be accord+ to ,god's ,^w1 & we conv9c$ !re(4 ,prot4 ,:y1 su* a submission ( ,judgm5t & ,ass5t ,i suppose y w pres5tly yield to me 9 any ?+1 :]e( y are conv9c$ by me2 may ?is future ,c\ncil !n *all5ge no fur!r ,duty f y8 :y !n %\ld ! ,*ur* be tr\bl$ to call x8 ,soc4 #eg,?\gh ?is ,future ,c\ncil also %\ld err1 yet x may af=d ,rem$y aga9/ ,inconv5i5ces2 & "o great ,inconv5i5ce be+1 ,break+ ! ,*ur*'s ,peace2 ?is is rem$i$ by its ,au?ority1 if ,i only yield ! ,ob$i5ce ( ,sil5ce !reto4 ,prot4 ,b if y\r ,ob$i5ce oblige n to sil5ce conc]n+ ,c\ncils pa/1 because ( y\r new ,evid5ces1 nei!r w x to a future1 if y ?9k x also do? err2 & ei!r ^! ,evid5ces rema9 /ill unsatisfi$1 or ^! satisfi$1 yet "s o!r new ones appe> to call = a new ,consid]ation4 ,soc4 #eh;,because x may also err1 x foll[s n x mu/ err2 & x is probable t x %all n err1 :5 ! =m] ,error is ?us discov]$1 & if ! ,c\ncil proce$ lawfully1 be n ov]aw$1 c4#ei ,b h[ev]1 if ,i ought ^u ?is review to be re/ra9$ to sil5ce1 yet1 ,i n conv9c$ ( ! tru? ( its ,decree1 ?is ,sil5ce is ! utt]mo/ t any future ,c\ncil1 aft] its reject+ my ,reasons1 c ju/ly exact ( me2 & n belief1 or ass5t1 at all3 ,x may n oblige me1 t ,i %\ld rel9qui% t y call ,soc9ianism at all1 b t1 n divulge x2 :]eas n[ by ! ,acts ( =m] ,c\ncils 7,i w\ld gladly "k ^u :at rational gr\nd7 an ,ana!ma is pron\nc$ aga9/ me1 if ,i d n believe ! contr>y1 & ,i am decl>$ to /& guilty ( ,h]esie me]ly = reta9+ ?is ,op9ion2 :i* reta9+ x is call$ ob/9acy & contumacy 9 me1 aft] ! ,c\ncils contr>y ,def9ition4 #da p4 #eae1 #eaf4 #db ,see be=e1 4 #ac4 #dc 4 #ac4 #dd ,see ,b>onius4 ,a4 ,d4 #cah1 #cai4 #de 4 #dgh4 #df p4 #fj4 #dg ,ib4 4 #aj4 #dh ,:itby1 p4 #ae4 ,/ill+fleet1 p4 #ejf1 #ecg4 #di 4 #cb4 n4 #e4 4 #cc4 consid4 #e4 n4 #a4 #ej ,dr4 ,f]ne1 ,case betwe5 ! ,*ur*es1 p4 #dh1 #di4 ,division ( ,*ur*es1 p4 #de4 #ea p4 #fff4 #eb ,a4 ,b4 ,laud #bde4 #ec ,id4 p4 #bbg4 #ed ,/ill+fl4 p4 #dgi1 #bib4 #ee ,see be=e1 ,disc4 #c4 4 #cd1 c4 #ef ,de ,baptismo1 l4 #b4 c4 #c4 #eg ,/ill+fl4 p4 #edb4 #eh ,/ill+fl4 ibid4 #ei ,id4 p4 #ebf4 ,,conf]5ce ,,iv4 ,8 ,plea1 = 8 n be+ guilty ( ,h]esie4 ,t he _c rightly accord+ to ,prote/ant ,pr9ciples1 be accus$ z guilty ( ,h]esie1 = sev]al reasons4 #a4 ,because ,prote/ants hold+ ,h]esie to be an ob/9ate def5ce ( "s error aga9/ a fundam5tal1 he ?9ks f h5ce 8 t55t fre$ f be+ an ,h]esie1 z long z 9 sil5ce he reta9s x1 unless he engage fur!r1 to a publick p]t9aci\s ma9ta9+ !re(4 4 #bc4 #b4 ,fundam5tals v>y+ accord+ to p>ticul> p]sons1 & suffici5t proposal2 none c conclude ?is po9t 9 ! affirmative1 to be1 z to him1 a fundam5tal1 or1 ( ! tru? ( :i* he ha? _h a suffici5t proposal4 #c4 ,t a lawful ,g5]al ,c\ncil's decl>+ "s po9t ,h]esie1 do? n necess>ily argue t x is s2 because !y may err 9 ,fundam5tals2 or at lea/ 9 di/+ui%+ !m f o!r po9ts4 4 #bf4 #d4 ,t he c h no autocatacrisie or ob/9acy 9 a diss5t+ f _! ,def9itions1 till he is ei!r actually conv9c$1 or at lea/ ha? _h a suffici5t proposal ei!r ( ! tru? ( su* po9t def9$3 t su* ,c\ncils h au?ority to require submission1 ( judgm5t1 & ass5t to _! ,def9itions3 ( :i* conviction or suffici5t proposal 7t v>ies mu*1 accord+ to ! diff]+ conditions ( sev]al p]sons7 z to himself1 none c judge save himself3 &1 consequ5tly1 nei!r c !y judge ( 8 guilt ( ,h]esie4 ,ib4 4 #bc4 #d4 ,prot4 ,y "k t all ,h]eticks are mo/ ju/ly ana!matiz$1 & cut (f f be+ any long] ,memb]s ( ! ,ca?olick ,*ur*1 & s d rema9 exclud$ also f ,salvation4 ,n[ ?is ,t55t ( y\rs ha? always be5 e/eem$ by ! ,*ur* ( ,god a mo/ p]nici\s ,h]esie4 ,soc4 ,i confess ,h]esie a mo/ griev\s ,crime1 dread & abhor x1 & tru/ ,i am mo/ free f su* a guilt2 & f ?is ,i h _m ways ( cle>+ my self4 ,= ,h]esie 7z ,mr4 ,*ill+wor? def9es x7 #fj;be+ n an err+1 b an ob/9ate def5ce ( an ,error2 n ( any ,error1 b ( "o aga9/ a necess>y or fundam5tal ,article ( ! ,*ri/ian ,fai?4 ,fir/1 ,?\gh ?is :i* ,i hold %\ld be an error1 & t aga9/ a ,fundam5tal1 yet my sil5ce practis$ !re91 c nev] be call$ an ob/9ate def5ce !re(1 & !re=e n my t55t an ,h]esie4 #b4 ,s9ce ,fundam5tals v>y accord+ to p>ticul> p]sons1 & 7z ,mr4 ,*ill+wor? sai?#fa7--,no ,catalogue !re(1 t c be giv51 c univ]sally s]ve = all m52 ,god requir+ m ( !m1 to :om he gives m1 & less ( !m1 to :om he gives less2--,& t may be suffici5tly decl>$ to "o 7all ?+s consid]$7 :i* 7all ?+s consid]$7 is n to ano!r suffici5tly decl>$3 & v>iety ( circum/ances makes x z impossible to set d[n an exact ,catalogue ( ,fundam5tals1 z to make a ,coat to fit ! ,moon 9 all h] *anges3 ,& 7z ,mr4 ,/ill+fleet foll[s him#fb7 s9ce ! measure ( ,fundam5tals dep5ds on ! suffici5cy ( ! proposition2 & none c assign :at numb] ( ?+s are suffici5tly prop\nd$ to ! belief ( all p]sons1 or set d[n ! exact b\nds1 z to all individuals1 :5 _! ignorance is inexcusable1 & :5 n2 or tell :at is ! measure ( _! capacity2 :at all[ance ,god makes = ! prejudice ( ,education1 c4 ,h5ce ,i conceive my self free f ,h]esie1 9 ?is my op9ion1 on ?is score also2 because ?\gh ! contr>y be to "s o!rs a ,fundam5tal tru?1 & to be explicitly believ$ by !m2 yet to me1 z n hav+ any suffici5t proposal1 or conviction !re(1 b r ( ! contr>y1 x is no ,fundam5tal1 & consequ5tly1 my t55t oppos+ x1 if an error1 yet no ,h]esie4 4 #bd4 ,prot4 ,d n deceive y\r self2 = ?\gh accord+ to diff]5t revelations1 to ^? t 7 )\t ,law1 or ^? "u ! ,law1 or ^? "u ! ,gospel2 ,fundam5tals g5]ally spok5 (1 might be m to "s ?an o!rs2 yet to all ^? :o "k & embrace ! ,gospel1 we say#fc2 all ,fundam5tals are !re9 cle>ly propos$ to all reasonable m51 ev5 ! unle>n$2 & !re=e ! err+ !re91 to all su*1 _c b be ob/9ate & ,h]etical4 ,soc4 ,unless y mean only ?is1 ,t all ,fundam5tals1 7i4e4 s _m z are requir$ ( any "o7 are cle> to him 9 ,scripture2 b n all ! same ,fundam5tals1 !re cle> to e "o2 b to "s m ( !m2 to "s few]2 ,i see n h[ ?is la/ said1 accords ) t said be=e by ! same p]son4 ,b if y mean ?us1 !n ,consub/antiality1 7! po9t we talk (7 may be a ,fundam5tal to y1 & cle> 9 ,scripture1 b also n cle> to me 9 ,scripture1 & s no ,fundam5tal1 & h5ce ,i ?9k my self safe4 ,=1----#fd;,i believ+ all t is cle> to me 9 ,scripture1 mu/ ne$s believe all ,fundam5tals2 & s ,i _c incurr ,h]esie1 :i* is opposite to "s fundam5tal----#fe,! ,scripture suffici5tly in=m+ me :at is ! ,fai?1 mu/ ( necessity also tea* me :at is ,h]esie3 ,t :i* is /reight w pla9ly tea* u :at is crook$2 & "o contr>y _c b manife/ ! o!r4 4 #be4 ,prot4 ,i pray y consid] a little bett] :at y said la/2 = s9ce ,h]esie z y grant x1 is an ob/9ate def5ce ( error only aga9/ "s necess>y po9t ( ,fai?2 & all tru? deliv]$ 9 ,scripture is n su*2 unless y c also di/+ui%1 9 ,scripture1 ^! po9ts ( necess>y ,fai? f o!rs1 y c h no c]ta9 k ( ,h]esie1 & ! believ+ all t is deliv]$ 9 ,scripture1 ?\gh x may pres]ve y f incurr+ ,h]esie1 yet _c direct y at all = kn[+ or disc]n+ ,h]esie1 or an error aga9/ a fundam5tal or a necess>y po9t ( ,fai?1 f o!r simple & less dang]\s errors1 t are n s3 nor1 by ?is c y ev] "k :at errors are ,h]esies1 :at n2 & s aft] all y\r confid5ce1 if by y\r neglect y happ5 n to believe "s ,scriptures 9 _! true s5se1 y c h no security 9 y\r ,fundam5tal1 or necess>y ,fai?2 or ( y\r n incurr+ ,h]esie4 ,nei!r1 ,secondly1 accord+ to y\r disc\rse1 ha? ! ,*ur* any means to "k any "o to be an ,h]etick2 because %e c nev] "k ! j latitude ( 8 fundam5tals4 ,& s ,h]esie w be a griev\s s9 inde$2 b walk+ "u su* a viz>d ( non-suffici5t proposal1 z ! ,ecclesia/ical ,sup]iors _c discov] or puni% x4 ,!re=e to avoid su* confusion 9 ! ,*ri/ian ,fai?1 !re ha? be5 alwaies ackn[l$g$ 9 ! ,*ur* "s au?ority = decl>+ ,h]esie2 & x may seem conviction en\gh to y1 t h] mo/ ,g5]al ,c\ncils h def9$ ! contr>y position to :at y ma9ta92 & receiv$ x = a fundam5tal4 ,( :i* ,ecclesia/ical ,au?ority = decl>+ ,h]esie1 ?us ,dr4 ,pott]1 #ff----,! ,ca?olick ,*ur* is c>eful to gr\nd all h] decl>ations 9 matt]s ( ,fai?1 ^u ! div9e au?ority ( ,gods writt5 ^w4 ,& !re=e :osoev] wilfully oppose? a judgm5t s well gr\nd$1 is ju/ly e/eem$ an ,h]etick2 n prop]ly because he disobeys ! ,*ur*2 b because he yields n to ,scripture suffici5tly prop\nd$1 or cle>$ unto him i4 e4 by ! ,*ur*4 ,:]e ! ,doctor seems to grant ^! two ?+s3 ,t all t ! ,ca?olick ,*ur* decl>es aga9/ ,h]esie is gr\nd$ ^u ! ,scripture2 & t all su* z oppose h] judgm5t are ,h]eticks3 b only he adds1 t !y are n ,h]eticks prop]ly1 or =mally = ?is oppos+ ! ,*ur*1 b = oppos+ ! ,scriptures4 ,:il/ !re=e ! =malis ratio ( ,h]esie is disput$1 t all su* are ,h]eticks seems grant$4 ,& ! same ,dr4 else:]e concludes ?us1 #fg----,! mi/ak] w nev] prove1 t we oppose any ,decl>ation ( ! ,ca?olick ,*ur*1 he means su* a ,*ur* z makes ,decl>ations1 & t mu/ be 9 h] ,c\ncils----,& !re=e he do? unju/ly *>ge u ) ,h]esie4 ,& aga91 he sai?1 #fh----,:atsoev] op9ion ^! anci5t writ]s ,s4 ,au/91 ,epiphanius & o!rs conceiv$ to be contr>y to ! common or approv$ op9ion ( ,*ri/ians1 t !y call$ an ,h]esie1 because x diff]$ f ! receiv$ op9ion2 n because x oppos$ any =mal ,def9ition ( ! ,*ur*3 :]e1 9 say+1 n because x oppos$ any ,def9ition1 he means1 n only because4 ,=1 :il/ t1 :i* diff]$ f ! receiv$ op9ion ( ! ,*ur*1 0 acc\nt$ an ,h]esie by !m1 t1 :i* diff]$ f a =mal def9ition ( ! ,*ur*1 0 s mu* m4 ,some?+ ,i f9d also = y\r bett] in=mation1 9 ! ,le>n$ ,dr4 ,hammond1 #fi;comm5t+ on t notable ,text 9 ,titus----,a man t is an ,h]etick aft] ! fir/ & second admonition1 reject1 a ,text imply+ contr>y to y\r disc\rse1 ,h]esie discov]able1 & c5surable by ! ,*ur*1 :]e he expla9s autokatakritos self-condemn$2 n to signifie a mans publick accus+ or condemn+ 8 own doctr9es or practices2 = t condemnation w\ld r be a motive to free "o f ! ,*ur*'s ,c5sures4 ,nor #bly to d5ote "o t (f5ds aga9/ ,consci5ce1 & ?\gh he kn[s he be 9 ! wrong1 yet holds out 9 opposition to ! ,*ur*2 = s1 none b ,hypocrites w\ld be ,h]eticks2 & he t /ood aga9/ ! ,doctr9 ( ,*ri/ & 8 ,*ur* 9 ! pure/ times y may guess :om he means %\ld n be an ,h]etick3 & s no ,h]etick c\ld possibly be admoni%$ or c5sur$ by ! ,*ur*1 = no man w\ld ackn[l$ge ( himself1 t :at he did 0 by him done aga9/ 8 own ,consci5ce1 ! plea :i* y also make "h = y\r self4 ,b to be an expression ( 8 sep>ation f1 & disob$i5ce to ! ,*ur*2 & s an evid5ce ( ! exe/raptai kai ham>tanei 8 be+ p]v]t$1 & s9n+ wilfully1 & )\t excuse4 ,:at say y to ?is8 4 #bf4 ,soc4 ,:at ^! ,au?ors say1 z y give _! s5se1 seems to me contr>y to ! ,prote/ant ,pr9ciples1 ,see ,d4 ,pott]1 p4 #afe1 #afg4----;,d4 ,hammond ( ,h]esie1 4 #g4 n4----4 #i4 n4 #h4 ,def4 ( ,l4 ,falkl4 c4 #a4 p4 #bc4 & to _! own positions else:]e2 nei!r1 surely1 w ,prote/ants tye !mselves to ?is measure & trial ( autocatacrisie4 ,=1 s9ce !y say2 ,t lawful ,g5]al ,c\ncils may err 9 ,fundam5tals2 ^! ,c\ncils may also def9e1 or decl>e some?+ ,h]esie t is n aga9/ a ,fundam5tal2 & if s1 ,i1 ?\gh 9 ?is self-conv9c$1 t su* is _! ,def9ition1 yet am mo/ free f ,h]esie 9 my n ass5t+ to x1 or 7if !y err intoll]ably7 9 oppos+ x4 ,aga91 s9ce ,prote/ants say1 ,c\ncils may err 9 di/+ui%+ ,fundam5tals1 ^! ,c\ncils may err also 9 disc]n+ ,h]esie1 :i* is an error aga9/ a ,fundam5tal1 f o!r errors t are aga9/ non-,fundam5tals4 ,aga93 ,:il/ ,i _c di/+ui% ,fundam5tals 9 _! ,def9itions1 ?us no ,def9ition ( a ,g5]al ,c\ncil may be rec$$ f by me1 = fe> ( my incurr+ ,h]esie2 a consequ5ce :i* ,prote/ants all[ n4 ,aga93 ,s9ce ,prote/ants affirm all ,fundam5tals pla9 9 ,scripture1 :y %\ld !y place autocatacrisie1 or self-conviction1 9 respect ( ! ,decl>ation ( ! ,*ur* r ?an ( ! ,scripture8 ,b1 to requite y\r =m] quotations1 ,i w %ew 9 pla9] ,language ! /at+ ( ,prote/ant ,div9es conc]n+ ,autocatacrisie z to ! ,def9itions ( ! ,*ur*1 "u :i* my op9ion also f9ds suffici5t %elt]2 ,we h no assurance at all 7sai? ,bi%op ,bramhall#gj7 t all ,g5]al ,c\ncils 71 & always %all be s prud5tly manag$1 & _! proce$+s always s ord]ly & upright1 t we d>e make all _! s5t5ces a suffici5t conviction ( all ,*ri/ians1 :i* !y are b\nd to believe "u pa9 ( damnation4 ,i add1 or "u pa9 ( ,h]esie--,& ,ib4 p4 #ajb4----;,i ackn[l$ge 7sai? he7 t a ,g5]al ,c\ncil1 may make t reveal$ tru? necess>y to be believ$ by a ,*ri/ian z a po9t ( ,fai?1 :i* =m]ly 0 n necess>y to be believ$2 t is1 :5soev] ! reasons & gr\nds ( tru? produc$ by ! ,c\ncil1 or ! au?ority ( ! ,c\ncil 7:i* is1 & always ought to be v great ) all sob] discreet ,*ri/ians7 d conv9ce a man 9 8 ,consci5ce ( ! tru? ( ! ,c\ncils ,def9itions3 :i* tru? ,i am z yet n conv9c$ (1 nei!r f ! reasons nor au?ority ( ! ,c\ncil ( ,nice4 ,or1 if y _h r h x out ( ,dr4 ,pott]----,x is n resi/+ 7sai? he#ga7 ! voice or def9itive s5t5ce1 :i* makes an ,h]etick2 b an ob/9ate /&+ out aga9/ evid5t ,scripture suffici5tly cle>$ unto him4 ,& ! ,scripture may !n be said to be suffici5tly cle>$ :5 x is s op5$1 t a good & tea*able m9d 7lov+ & seek+ tru?7 my ,consci5ce conv9ce? me n1 b t su* ,i am _c ga9say x4--,aga9 #gb----;,x is possible 7sai? he7 t ! s5t5ce ( a ,c\ncil or ,*ur* may be errone\s1 ei!r because ! op9ion condemn$ is no ,h]esie or error aga9/ ! ,fai?1 9 x self consid]$2 or because ! p>ty s condemn$ is n suffici5tly conv9c$ 9 8 und]/&+ 7n cl\d$ ) prejudice1 ambition1 va9-glory1 or ! l passion7 t x is an error "o ( ^! ,i acc\nt my self4 ,or out ( ,dr4 ,hammond1 #gc----;,x mu/ be lawful = ! ,*ur* ( ,god1 any ,*ur*1 or any ,*ri/ian1 ^u ! ,doctors reason1 z well z = ! ,bi%op ( ,rome1 to enquire :e!r ! ,decrees ( an ,univ]sal ,c\ncil h be5 agreeable to ,apo/olical ,tradition or no2 & if !y be f\nd o!rwise1 to eject !m out1 or n to receive !m into _! belief4 ,& !n /ill x is ! matt] ( ! ,decrees1 & ! ,apo/olicalness ( !m1 & ! =ce ( ! te/ification1 :]eby !y are approv$ & ackn[l$g$ to be su*1 :i* gives ! au?ority to ! ,c\ncil2 & no?+ else is suffici5t1 :]e t is n to be f\nd4 ,& else:]e he bo? d5ies 9 ,g5]al an ,infallibility ( ,c\ncils1 & gr\nds ! ,rev]5ce due to ! ,f\r fir/ ,c\ncils on _! sett+ d[n & conv9c+ ! tru? ( _! ,doctr9 out ( ! ,scripture words und]/ood ) piety1----& ! fet*+ _! ,def9itions regul>ly f ! s5se !re(1 :i* ! ,g5]al ,*ur*es _h receiv$ d[n f ! ,apo/les4#gd ,^u :i* foll[s1 t1 9 su* case1 :]e a ,lawful ,g5]al ,c\ncil do? n s1 7z possibly x may1 & ,inf]iors are to consid] = !mselves1 :e!r x do? n7 !re may be no ,h]etical ,autocatacrisie 9 a diss5t f x1 nor ?is diss5t an evid5ce ( ! exe/raptai & ham>tanei 8 be+ p]v]t$ & s9n+ wilfully1 & )\t excuse4----,la/ly1 ?us ,doctor ,/ill+fleet conc]n+ ,h]esie#ge----,! =mal reason ( ,h]esie is d5y+ some?+ suppos$ to be ( div9e ,revelation2 & !re=e1 #bly4 ,none c reasonably be accus$ ( ,h]esie1 b su* z h suffici5t reason to believe1 t t :i* !y d5y is reveal$ by ,god4 ,& !re=e1 #cly4 ,none c be guilty ( ,h]esie = d5y+ any ?+ decl>$ by ! ,*ur*2 unless !y h suffici5t reason to believe1 t :atev] is decl>$ by ! ,*ur* is reveal$ by ,god2 & !re=e ! ,*ur*'s ,def9ition _c make any ,h]eticks1 b su* z h reason to believe1 t %e _c err 9 h] ,def9itions4 ,f h5ce also he ga!rs1 ,t ,prote/ants are 9 less dang] ( ,h]esie ?an ,papi/s1 till ^! give !m m suffici5t reasons to prove1 t :atev] ! ,*ur* decl>es1 is c]ta9ly reveal$ by ,god4 ,?us he4 ,n[ su* suffici5t prov+ reasons z ,prote/ants plead1 t ,papi/s h n yet giv5 !m conc]n+ ?is matt] ( ,*ur*-,au?ority1 ,i all$ge1 t nei!r h !y nor o!rs giv5 me4 ,to be self-condemn$1 !re=e1 9 my diss5t f ! def9ition ( ! ,c\ncil ( ,nice1 ,i mu/ fir/ h suffici5t reason propos$ to me to believe1 7& s rema9 self-condemn$ & ,h]etical 9 disbeliev+ x7 ?is po9t2 viz4 ,t ! ,*ur*1 or h] ,c\ncil1 ha? p[] to def9e matt]s ( ,fai? 9 su* mann]1 z to require my ass5t !reto4 ,:i* s long z ,i f9d no suffici5t reason to believe1 ,i suppose ,i am fre$ 7)\t ob/9acy or ,h]esie1 or be+ !re9 self-condemn$17 f yield+ ass5t to any p>ticul> matt] ( ,fai?1 :i* ! ,*ur* def9es4 ,&1 _h ,i suffici5t reason propos$ to me = believ+ ?is po9t1 yet s long z ,i am n actually conv9c$ !re(1 ,i become only guilty ( a fault ( ignorance1 n ob/9acy1 or autocatacrisie1 or ,h]esie2 =1 if ,i am self-condemn$1 or guilty ( ob/9acy 9 disbeliev+ ! =esaid po9ts1 #gf,!n ,i become s1 ei!r by ! ,*ur*'s def9ition ( ?is po9t1 or )\t x4 ,by reason ( ! ,*ur*'s def9ition ( ?is x _c be2 = ?is v p[] ( def9+ is ! ?+ 9 "q1 & !re=e _c be cle>$ to me by ! ,*ur*'s def9+ x#gg3 & ?us1 ,t ?+ is propos$ to me 9 ! def9ition to be believ$1 :i* mu/ be suppos$ to be believ$ by me already1 be=e su* proposal or def9ition1 or else ! def9ition is n necess>y to be believ$4 #gh,nor )\t1 or be=e su* def9ition1 c ,i h an autocatacrisie2 because ?is autocatacrisie1 y say ) ,dr4 ,hammond1 arise? f my disob$i5ce to ! ,*ur*4 ,prot4 ,me?9ks1 y make ! same plea = y\r self 9 ?is matt]1 z if "o1 t is que/ion$ = n obey+ ! div9e precepts1 or n believ+ ! div9e ,revelations deliv]$ 9 ,scripture1 %\ld ?9k to excuse himself by ?is answ]2 t inde$ he do? n believe ! ,scripture to be ,god's ,^w2 & !re=e he conceives1 t he _c reasonably be requir$ to believe t :i* is conta9$ !re94 ,&1 z su* a p]son ha? z mu* reason 7?\gh ?is1 n f ! ,scripture1 yet f ,apo/olical ,tradition7 to believe t ,scripture is ,gods ,^w1 z to believe :at is writt5 9 x2 s h y1 ?\gh n f ! ,nic5e ,c\ncil def9+ x1 yet f ,scripture & ,tradition manife/+ x1 z mu* reason to believe its au?ority ( def9+1 z :at is def9$4 ,x's true inde$2 t _h y n suffici5t proposal1 or suffici5t reason to "k ?is y\r duty ( ,ass5t to ?is def9ition ( ! ,c\ncil ( ,nice1 y 7 faultless 9 x2 b h]e9 lies y\r dang]1 t f f9d+ a non actual conviction ( ! tru?1 )91 7h9dr$ !re by ,i "k n :at sup9e neglig5ce1 or /rong self-conceit1 c47 y ga!r a non-suffici5t proposal1 )\t4 #bg4 ,soc4 ,x rema9s !n to enquire1 :o %all judge conc]n+ ?is suffici5t proposal1 or suffici5t reason1 :i* ,i am said to h1 to believe :at ! ,nic5e ,c\ncil1 or ! ,*ur* ha? decl>$ 9 ?is po9t4 #gi,:e!r ! ,*ur*'s judgm5t is to be tak5 by me 9 ?is1 or my own made use (2 ,if h] judgm5t1 ! gr\nd ( my belief & ( ,h]esie lies /ill 9 ! ,*ur*'s def9ition2 & ?us x w be all "o 9 effect1 :e!r ,i believe :at %e decl>es1 )\t suffici5t reason2 or le>n ?is ( h]1 :5 !re is suffici5t reason to believe s4 ,x mu/ be !n1 my own judgm5t1 ,i am to be direct$ by 9 ?is matt]#hj3 & if s1 !n x is to be presum$1 t ,god do? bo? af=d me "s means n to be mi/ak5 !re92 & also "s c]ta9 k :5 ,i d use ?is means aright3 7=1 )\t ^! two ,i c h no security 9 my own judgm5t 9 a matt] ( s high conc]nm5t1 z ,h]esie & fundam5tal ,fai? is47 ,n[ ?is means1 9 ?is matt]1 ,i presume ,i h daily us$1 9 t ,i f9d my ,consci5ce1 aft] mu* exam9ation1 !re9 to acquit me1 unless y c prescribe me "s o!r sur] evid5ce1 )\t s5d+ me back aga9 to ! au?ority ( ! ,*ur*4 ,prot4 #a4 ,:il/ y\r discov]y ( y\r t55t to be an ,h]esie dep5ds on y\r hav+ suffici5t reason to believe x is s4 ,& #b4 ,! judgm5t ( y\r hav+1 or n hav+ suffici5t reason to believe ?is1 is left to y\r self1 ! ,*ur* ha? no means to "k y or any o!r to be an ,h]etick1 till !y decl>e !mselves to be s4 ,& ?us1 9 /riv+ to free y\r self f ,h]esie1 y h fre$ all mank9d f x1 7z to any ext]nal discov]y & conv9cem5t !re(7 & cancell$ su* a s92 unless we c f9d "o1 t w confess himself to ma9ta9 a ?+ aga9/ 8 own ,consci5ce4 ,soc4 ,if ,i1 s d ! ,prote/ants2 =1 !y also hold none guilty ( ,h]esie1 = d5y+ any ?+ decl>$ by ! ,*ur*1 unless !y h reason to believe1 t :atev] is decl>$ by ! ,*ur* is reveal$ by ,god2 & ( ?is suffici5t reason !y make n ! ,*ur* or ,sup]iors1 b !mselves1 ! ,judge4 #fj p4 #bga4 #fa p4 #acd4 #fb p4 #ih4 #ii4 #fc ,*ill+w4 p4 #ib4 #fd ,*ill+w4 p4 #cfg4 #fe ,ib4 #aja4 #ff p4 #ig4 #fg p4 #acb4 #fh p4 #ajc4 #fi ,titus #c4 #aa4 #gj ,reply to ,*alc$4 p4 #aje4 #ga p4 #abh4 #gb p4 #abi4 #gc ,h]esie1 p4 #aad4 #gd ,( ,h]esie p4 #if4 #ge ,rat4 ,acc\nt4 p4 #gc4 #gf ,/ill+fl4 p4 #ii4 #gg ,/ill+fl4 p4 #gd4 #gh ,ib4 p4 #ii4 #gi ,/ill+fl4 p4 #gc4 #hj ,see ,/ill4 p4 #dgi4 ,,conf]5ce ,v4 ,8 ,plea1 = 8 n be+ guilty ( ,s*ism4 #a4 ,t ! ,soc9ian ,*ur*es h n =sak5 ! :ole ,*ur* ,ca?olick1 or ! ext]nal ,communion ( x3 b only left "o "p ( x t 0 corrupt$2 & re=m$ ano!r "p1 7i4e47 !mselves4 ,or1 t he1 & ! ,soc9ian ,*ur*es1 be+ a "p ( ! ,ca?olick1 !y h n sep>at$ f ! :ole1 because n f !mselves4 4 #bh4 #b4 ,t _! sep>ation be+ = an error unju/ly impos$ ^u !m z a condition ( ,communion1 ! ,s*ism is n !irs1 :o made ! sep>ation2 b !irs :o caus$ x4 4 #bi4 ,besides t1 :atev] ! tru? ( ?+s be2 yet s long z !y are requir$ by any ,*ur* to pr(ess !y believe1 :at !y d n1 _! sep>ation _c be said causless1 & s ,s*ism4 4 #cb4 #c4 ,t ?\gh he & 8 p>ty _h =sak5 ! ext]nal ,communion ( all o!r ,*ur*es1 yet n ! int]nal2 9 :i* !y rema9 /ill unit$ to !m3 bo? 9 t int]nal ,communion ( ,*>ity1 9 n condemn+ all o!r ,*ur*es z non-,ca?olick2 & 9 t ( ,fai?1 9 all ,ess5tials & ,fundam5tals1 & 9 all su* po9ts1 :]e9 ! ,unity ( ! ,*ur* ,ca?olick consi/s4 4 #cj4 #d4 ,t ! doctr9 ( ,consub/antiality = :i* !y dep>t$1 is d5y$ by !m to be any ,fundam5tal2 nor c ! ,*ur*es1 f :i* !y dep>t = x1 be a compet5t ,judge aga9/ !m1 t x is s4 4 #cd4 #e4 ,t1 ?\gh !y are sep>at]s f ! ,roman1 yet n f ! ,re=m$ ,*ur*es1 :i* ,*ur*es leave m5 to ! lib]ty ( _! own judgm5t2 nor require any int]nal ass5t to _! doctr9s 79 :i* ?+ ^! blame ! tyranny ( ! ,roman ,*ur*7 save only conditional1 if any be conv9c$ ( ! tru? !re(2 or1 n conv9c$ ( ! contr>y4 4 #ce4 #f4 ,9 f9e1 t = enjoy+ & cont9u+ 9 ! ,prote/ant ,communion he make? z full a pr(ession ( con=mity to h] ,doctr9s z ,mr4 ,*ill+wor? ha? done 9 sev]al places ( 8 book1 :i* yet 0 accept$ z suffici5t4 4 #da4 4 #bh4 #e4 ,prot4 ,i h yet "o ?+ m1 ab\t :i* to "q y4 ,if y w n ackn[l$ge y\r op9ion ,h]esie 9 oppos+ ! publick judgm5t1 & def9ition ( ! ,ca?olick ,*ur* 9 t mo/ rev]5d ,c\ncil ( ,nice1 ^u pret5ce t y h n _h a conv9c+ ,proposal1 t ?is ,def9ition 0 !re9 made accord+ to ,god's ,^w1 or ! ,scriptures2 yet1 h[ w y cle> y\r self1 or y\r ,soc9ian ,congregations ( ,s*ism8 avoidable ^u no plea ( adh]5ce to ,scripture1 if x %all appe>1 t y h = ?is op9ion des]t$ ! ,communion ( ! ,ca?olick ,*ur*2 out ( :i* ,*ur* is no ,salvation4 ,soc4 #ha;,i grant !re nei!r is1 nor c be any j cause to dep>t f ! ,*ur* ( ,*ri/2 no m ?an f ,*ri/ himself3 !re=e ,i utt]ly d5y1 t our ,*ur*es h made any sep>ation f ! ,*ur* ,ca?olick at all3 & ?is = _m reasons4 ,= #a/4 #hb--,we h n =sak5 ! :ole ,*ur*1 or ! ext]nal ,communion ( x3 b only t "p ( x :i* is corrupt$1 & /ill w be s2 & h n =sak51 b only re=m$ ano!r "p ( x1 :i* "p we our selves are3 & ,i suppose y w n g ab\t to p]swade u1 t we h =sak5 our selves1 or our own ,communion4 ,& if y urge1 t we jo9$ our selves to no o!r "p1 !re=e we sep>at$ f ! :ole3 ,i say1 x foll[s n1 inasmu* z our selves 7 a "p ( x1 & /ill cont9u$ s1 & !re=e c no m sep>ate f ! :ole1 ?an f our selves4 ,prot4 ,s !n1 x seems we ne$ fe> no ,s*ism1 f ! ,*ur* ,ca?olick till a "p c divide f x self1 :i* c nev] be4 4 #bi4 ,soc4 ,next1 ,z = our sep>at+ f all o!r p>ticul> ,*ur*es1 ! gr\nd ( our ,sep>ation be+ an error1 :i* ha? crept into ! ,communion ( ^! ,*ur*es1 & :i* is unju/ly impos$ ^u u 9 ord] to ?is ,communion1 we conceive1 9 ?is case1 if any1 ,!y1 n ,we1 are ! ,s*ismaticks3 = z ! ,ar*-,bi%op#hc4----,! ,s*ism is !irs1 ^: ! ,cause ( x is2 & he makes ! sep>ation1 :o gives ! fir/ j cause ( x1 n he t makes actual sep>ation1 ^u a j cause prec$+4 4 #cj4 ,aga91 ,?\gh we h made an actual ,sep>ation f !m1 z to ! n-con=m+ to1 or also z to ! re=m+ ( an error3 yet1 ,fir/1 ,z to ,*>ity2 we d /ill reta9 ) ! same ,*ur*es our =m] ,communion4----,n divid+ f !m ?r\gh ! brea* ( ,*>ity2 ,or condemn+ all o!r ,*ur*es1 z no p>ts ( ! ,ca?olick ,*ur*1 & draw+ ! ,communion :olly to our selves1 z did ^? fam\s ,s*ismaticks1 ! ,donati/s4 ,see ,doctor ,f]ne ,division ( ,*ur*es1 p4 #aje4 & #ca1 #cb4 4 #ca4 ,next1 z to matt] ( ,fai?3 ,we hold t all sep>ation f all p>ticul> ,*ur*es 9 su* a ?+1 :]e9 ! unity ( ! ,ca?olick ,*ur* do? n consi/1 is no sep>ation f ! :ole ,*ur*1 nor is any ?+ m1 ?an our susp5sion f ! ,communion ( p>ticul> ,*ur*es1 till su* _! error is re=m$2 ,=1 z ,doctor ,/ill+fleet#hd----,!re c be no sep>ation f ! :ole ,*ur*1 b 9 su* ?+s1 :]e9 ! unity ( ! :ole ,*ur* lies3--,:oso !re=e sep>ates f any p>ticul> ,*ur* z to ?+s n conc]n+ _! be+1 is only sep>at$ f ! ,communion ( t ,*ur*1 & n ! ,ca?olick4 ,n[1 t = :i* we h sep>at$ f o!r ,*ur*es1 we conceive n su*1 z is ess5tial1 or conc]ns ! be+ ( a ,*ur* s1 t )\t x we or !y _c /ill reta9 ! ess5ce !re(2 we decl>e also our read9ess to joyn ) !m aga91 if ?is error be correct$1 or at lea/ n impos$3 ,& #he7;z ,dr4 ,/ill+fleet sai?7----,:]e !re is ?is read9ess ( ,communion1 !re is no absolute sep>ation f ! ,*ur* z su*1 b only susp5d+ ,communion1 till su* abuses be re=m$1 or n press$ ^u u4 ,& z ,bi%op ,bramhall#hf----,:5 "o "p ( ! univ]sal ,*ur* sep>ate? x self f ano!r "p1 n absolutely or 9 ess5tials1 b respectively 9 abuses1 & innovations1 n z x is a "p ( ! univ]sal ,*ur*1 b only s f> z x is corrupt$ & deg5]at$ :e!r 9 doctr9 or mann]s x do? /ill reta9 a ,communion n only ) ! ,ca?olick ,*ur*1 & ) all ! ,or?odox memb]s ( ! ,ca?olick ,*ur*1 b ev5 ) t corrupt$ ,*ur*1 f :i* x is sep>at$1 except only 9 su* ,corruptions4 4 #cb4 ,prot4 ,sav+ bett] ,judgm5ts1 me?9ks a sep>ation 7if causeless7 f ! ,communion ( all o!r ,*ur*es1 or f ^? :o are our ,sup]iors1 9 a less] matt] ?an su* a ,fundam5tal or ess5tial po9t ( ,*ri/ianity z de/roys ! be+ ( a ,*ur*1 %\ld be ,s*ism2 & ! small] ! po9t = :i* we sep>ate1 ! great] ! guilt ( our sep>ation4 ,7 n ! ,donati/s ,s*ismaticks 9 reject+ ! ,ca?olick ,communion1 requir+ _! con=mity 9 su* a po9t1 9 :i* ,/4 ,cyprian's error be=e ! ,*ur*'s def9+ !re( 0 v excusable2 & ! ,african ,congregations 9 8 "t n un-*ur*$ !reby8 ,soc4 #hg----;,b ! ,donati/s did cut (f f ! ,body ( ,*ri/1 & ! hope ( ,salvation1 ! ,*ur* f :i* !y sep>at$1 :i* is ! prop]ty ( ,s*ismaticks4----,& #hh----,!y 7 ju/ly *>g$ ) ,s*ism1 because !y conf9$ ! ,ca?olick ,*ur* )9 _! own b\nds4 ,b z ,dr4 ,f]ne sai?#hi--;,_h ! ,donati/s only us$ _! lib]ty & judgm5t 9 t practice ( re-baptiz+ ,h]eticks1 leav+ o!r ,*ur*es to _! lib]ty2 & 7?\gh ?9k+ !m 9 an error = admitt+ ,h]eticks1 )\t baptiz+ !m1 yet7 will+ to h ,communion ) !m1 z p>ts ( ! ,ca?olick ,*ur* 7sav+ ! practices :]e9 !y diff]$71 !n _h !y n be5 guilty ( ,s*ism4 ,9 t :i* ,i hold ,i only foll[ my ,consci5ce1 condemn n ! ,*ur*es hold+ o!rwise3 ,on ! o!r side #ij;,*ri/ ha? =bid me "u pa9 ( damnation to pr(ess :at ,i believe n be x small or great & consequ5tly "u ! same p5alty ha? oblig$ me to leave ! ,communion1 9 :i* ,i _c rema9 )\t ! ,hypocritical ,pr(ession ( su* a ?+1 :i* ,i am conv9c$ to be errone\s4 #ia;,at lea/ ?is ,i "k1 t ! ,doctr9 :i* ,i h *os51 to me seems true1 & ! contr>y1 :i* ,i h =sak51 seems false3 & !re=e1 )\t remorse ( ,consci5ce1 ,i may pr(ess t1 b ?is ,i _c3 & a sep>ation1 = pres]v+ my ,consci5ce1 ,i hope w nev] be judg$ causeless4 4 #cc4 ,prot4 ,at ?is rate none w be a ,s*ismatick1 b he :o kn[s he erre? 7i4 e4 n :o holde?1 b only :o pr(esse? an error72 or :o kn[s1 t ! po9t1 = ! non-con=mity to :i*1 requir$ ( him1 he des]ts ! ,*ur*1 is a ,tru?1 & ! contr>y1 :i* he ma9ta9s1 an error4 ,b ,doctor ,hammond#ib tells y4 ,t he t do? n communicate ) ^? ,i suppose he means ,sup]iors ! condition ( ^: ,communion conta9s no?+ really errone\s or s9ful1 ?\gh ! doctr9 s propos$ z ! condition ( _! ,communion1 be appreh5d$ by him1 to :om x is ?us propos$1 to be false1 rema9s 9 ,s*ism4 ,soc4 ,& at ?is rate1 all ^?1 :o sep>ate f ! ,*ur*1 requir+ _! ass5t to :at is inde$ a tru?1 w be ,s*ismaticks1 7& t1 :e!r 9 a po9t ,fundam5tal1 or n ,fundam5tal17 ?\gh !y h us$ all ! indu/ry1 all ! means !y c 7except ?is1 ! rely+ on _! ,sup]iors judgm5t7 n to err2 unless y w say1 t all tru?s1 ev5 n ,fundam5tal1 are 9 ,scripture s cle>1 t none us+ a "r indu/ry1 c 7nei!r7 err 9 !m2 :i* no ,*ill+wor? ha? ma9ta9$ hi!rto4 4 #cd4 ,prot4 ,b we may let ?is pass2 =1 y\r sep>ation 0 9 a po9t p]spicu\s en\gh 9 ,scripture 7& s y void ( su* excuse73 0 9 a po9t ,ess5tial & ,fundam5tal1 & 9 :i* a wrong belief de/roys any long] ,communion ( a p>ticul> ,p]son or ,*ur*1 ) ! ,ca?olick4 ,soc4 ,?is ,i utt]ly d5y2 nor see ,i by :at way ?is c ev] be prov$ aga9/ me1 = y c assign no ,ecclesia/ical ,judge t c di/+ui% ,fundam5tals1 ,necess>ies1 or ,ess5tials1 f ^? po9ts t are n s1 z ha? be5 %ew$ already4 ,& z ,dr4 ,/ill+fleet#ic urge? conc]n+ ,h]esie1 s may ,i conc]n+ ,s*ism3----,:at are ! measures :]eby we ought to judge1 :at ?+s are ,ess5tial to ! be+ ( ,*ri/ianity1 or ( ! ,*ur*8 ,:e!r mu/ ! ,*ur*'s judgm5t be tak51 or e mans own judgm5t8 if ! =m]1 ! ,gr\nd ( ,s*ism lies /ill 9 ! ,*ur*'s def9itions1 contr>y to :at ,prote/ants affirm3 if ! latt]2 !n no "o c be a ,s*ismatick1 b he1 t oppose? t ( :i* he is1 or may be conv9c$1 t x is a ,fundam5tal1 or ess5tial matt] ( ,fai?4 ,if he be only a ,s*ismatick1 t oppose? t1 ( :i* he is conv9c$2 !n no man is a ,s*ismatick1 b he t goes aga9/ 8 pres5t ,judgm5t2 & s !re w be few ,s*ismaticks 9 ! _w2 ,if he1 t oppose? t1 :i* he may be conv9c$ (2 !n aga91 x is t :i* he may be conv9c$ (1 ei!r 9 ! ,*ur*'s judgm5t or 9 8 own3 ,if 9 ! ,*ur*'s1 x comes to ! same issue1 z 9 ! =m]3 ,if 9 8 own2 h[ ,i pray1 %all ,i "k1 t ,i may be conv9c$ ( :at1 us+ a due indeav\r1 ,i am n conv9c$ already8 or1 h[ %all ,i "k1 :5 a due indu/ry is us$8 & if ,i _c "k ?is1 h[ %\ld ,i ev] settle my self unless x be ^u ,au?ority1 :i* y all[ n4 ,aga91 ,i am taught1 t any p>ticul>1 :e!r ,p]son or ,*ur*1 may judge = !mselves ) ! ,judgm5t ( ,discretion3 ,& 9 ! matt] ( ,*ri/ian ,communion1----#id,t no?+ c be m unreasonable1 ?an t ! ,society suppose x be a ,c\ncil impos+ conditions ( its ,communion suppose ! ,c\ncil ( ,nice impos+ ,consub/antiality s %\ld be ,judge1 :e!r ^? conditions be j & equitable or no3 ,& especially 9 ?is case1 :]e a consid]able ,body ( ,*ri/ians judge su* ?+s requir$ to be unlawful conditions ( ,communion1 :at ju/ice or reason is !re1 t ! p>ty accus$ %\ld sit judge 9 8 own cause8 ,prot4 ,by ?is way no ,sep>ati/ c ev] be a ,s*ismatick1 if he is con/itut$ ! judge1 :e!r ! reason ( 8 sep>ation is j4 ,soc4 ,& 9 ! o!r way1 !re c nev] be any j cause ( sep>ation at all1 if ! ,*ur*-,gov]nors1 f :om ,i sep>ate1 are to judge1 :e!r t be an error1 = :i* ,i sep>ate4 4 #ce4 ,prot4 ,x seems some?+ t y say3 ,b yet1 ?\gh ^u su* consid]ation1 a free use ( y\r own judgm5t1 z to provid+ = y\r own ,salvation is grant$ y2 yet1 me?9ks 9 ?is matt] y h "s great] cause to suspect x1 s9ce sev]al ,*ur*es1 hav+ ( late tak5 lib]ty to exam9e by ,gods ,^w m /rictly ! corrupt doctr9s ( =m] ages1 yet ^! re=m$1 z well z ! o!r unre=m$1 /& opposite to y2 & nei!r ^? pr(ess+ to foll[ ! ,scriptures1 nor ^? pr(ess+ to foll[ ,tradition1 & ,*ur*-,au?ority2 nei!r ^? requir+ /rict ob$i5ce & submission ( judgm5t1 nor ^? indulg+ ,*ri/ian lib]ty1 c\nt5ance y\r doctr94 ,b y /& also ,re=m]s ( ! ,re=mation1 & sep>at$ f all4 ,soc4 ,s(t a little4 ,?\gh ,i /& sep>at$ inde$ f ! pres5t unre=m$ ,*ur*es2 or also 7if y w7 f ! :ole ,*ur* t 0 be=e ,lu!r2 yet ,i bo? enjoy ! ext]nal ,communion1 & ?9k ,i h reason to acc\nt my self a true memb] ( ! ,*ur*es ,re=m$2 &1 z ,i nev] condemn$ !m1 or ?\ght ,salvation n atta9able 9 !m2 s nei!r am ,i 7t ,i "k (7 exclud$ by1 or f !m2 s long z ,i reta9 my op9ion 9 sil5ce1 & d n di/urb _! peace2 & ,i take my self also on ^! t]ms to be a memb]1 9 p>ticul>1 ( ! ,*ur* ( ,engl&1 :]e9 ,i h be5 educat$4 ,=1 all ^! ,*ur*es 7z confess+ !mselves fallible 9 _! decree7 d n require ( _! ,subjects to yield any int]nal ass5t to _! ,doctr9s2 or to pr(ess any ?+ aga9/ _! ,consci5ce1 & 9 ,hypocrisie2 & d =be> to use t ,tyranny ^u any = enjoy+ _! ,communion1 :i* !y s mu* condemn 9 t ,*ur*1 f :i*1 = ?is v ?+1 !y 7 =c$ to "p ,communion1 & to re=m4 ,( ?is matt]1 ?us1 ,mr4 ,:itby#ie--,:om did our ,convocation ev] damn = n int]nally receiv+ _! decrees8 ,d !y n leave e man to ! lib]ty ( 8 judgm5t8--,!y d n require1 t we %\ld 9 all ?+s believe1 z !y believe2 b t we %\ld submit to _! det]m9ation1 & n contradict !m2 _! decisions are n obtrud$ z infallible ,oracles1 b only submitt$ to 9 ord] to peace & unity----,s t _! "w is r to sil5ce1 ?an to det]m9e disputes1 c4----& p4 #dch4 ,we grant a necessity1 or at lea/ a conv5i5ce ( a ,tribunal to decide controv]sies1 b h[8 ,n by caus+ any p]son to believe :at he did n antec$5tly to ^! decrees1 ^u ! sole au?ority ( ! ,c\ncil2 b by sil5c+ our disputes1 & mak+ u acquiesce 9 :at is prop\nd$ )\t any publick opposition to x1 keep+ our op9ions to our selves----,a lib]ty ( us+ private discretion 9 approv+ or reject+ any ?+ z deliv]$1 or n1 9 ,scripture1 we ?9k ought to be all[$2 = fai? _c be compell$2 & by tak+ away ?is lib]ty f m51 we %\ld =ce !m to become ,hypocrites1 & s pr(ess outw>dly :at inw>dly !y disbelieve4----,& see ,dr4 ,/ill+fleets ,rational ,acc\nt1 p4 #ajd4 :]e1 speak+ ( ! obligation to ! #ci4 ,articles1 he sai?1----,t ! ,*ur* ( ,engl&1 excommunicates su* z op5ly oppose h] doctr91 suppos+ h] fallible2 ! ,roman ,*ur* excommunicates all1 :o w n believe :atev] %e def9es to be infallibly true4----,t ! ,*ur* ( ,engl& b9de? m5 to peace to h] det]m9ations1 res]v+ to m5 ! lib]ty ( _! judgm5ts1 on pa9 ( excommunication if !y violate t peace4 ,= x is pla9 on ! "o side1 :]e a ,*ur* pret5ds infallibility1 ! excommunication is direct$ aga9/ ! p]sons = refus+ to give int]nal ass5t to :at %e def9es3 ,b :]e a ,*ur* does n pret5d to t1 ! excommunication respects :olly t ov]t ,act1 :]eby ! ,*ur*'s peace is brok54 ,& if a ,*ur* be b\nd to look to h] own peace1 no d\bt %e ha? p[] to excommunicate su* z op5ly violate ! bonds ( x2 :i* is only an act ( caution 9 a ,*ur* to pres]ve h] self 9 unity2 b :]e x is giv5 out1 t ! ,*ur* is infallible1 ! excommunication mu/ be s mu* ! m unreasonable1 because x is aga9/ ^? int]nal acts ( ! m9d1 ov] :i* ! ,*ur* z su* ha? no direct p[]4----,& p4 #ee4 he quotes ^! words out ( ,bi%op ,bramhall#if to ! same s5se1--,we d n suff] any man to reject ! #ci ,articles ( ! ,*ur* ( ,engl& at 8 pleasure2 yet nei!r d we look ^u !m z ess5tials ( sav+ fai?1 or legacies ( ,*ri/1 & 8 ,apo/les2 b1 9 a mean1 z pi\s op9ions fitt$ = ! pres]vation ( unity2 nei!r d we oblige any man to believe !m1 b only n to contradict !m4 ,by :i* we see :at va/ diff]5ce !re is1 betwe5 ^? ?+s :i* are requir$ by ! ,*ur* ( ,engl& 9 ord] to peace1 & ^? :i* are impos$ by ! ,*ur* ( ,rome1 c4 ,la/ly1 ?us ,mr4 ,*ill+wor?#ig ( ! j au?ority ( ,c\ncils & ,synods 7beyond :i* ! ,prote/ant ,synods1 or ,convocations pret5d n47----,! ,fa!rs ( ! ,*ur* 7sai? he7 9 aft] times i4 e4 aft] ! ,apo/les might h j cause to decl>e _! judgm5t1 t\*+ ! s5se ( "s g5]al ,articles ( ! ,cre$3 b to oblige o!rs to receive _! decl>ations "u pa9 ( damnation1 :at w>rant !y _h1 ,i "k n3 ,he1 t c %ew1 ei!r t ! ,*ur* ( all ages 0 to h ?is ,au?ority2 or1 t x cont9u$ 9 ! ,*ur* = "s ages1 & !n expir$3 ,he1 t c %ew ei!r ( ^! ?+s let him2 = my "p ,i _c4 ,yet ,i will+ly confess ! judgm5t ( a ,c\ncil1 ?\gh n infallible1 is yet s f> directive1 & oblig+1 t 7)\t app>5t reason to ! contr>y7 x may be s9 to reject x1 at lea/ n to af=d x an outw>d submission = publick peace sake4 ,?us mu*1 z ! ,prote/ant ,synods seem cont5t$ )1 s ,i all[--,aga9 p4 #cge4 ,he sai?----,any ?+ besides ,scripture1 & ! pla91 irrefragable1 indubitable consequ5ces ( x2 ,well may ,prote/ants hold x z matt] ( op9ion1 b z matt] ( fai? & religion1 nei!r c !y ) coh]5ce to _! own gr\nds believe x !mselves1 nor require ! belief ( x ( o!rs1 )\t mo/ high & mo/ s*ismatical presumption4 ,?us he3 n[ ,i suppose t ei!r no ,prote/ant ,*ur* or ,synod w /ile ! ,son's coequal ,god-head ) ! ,fa!r a pla9 irrefragable1 indubitable ,scripture1 or consequ5ce !re(1 ab\t :i* is1 & ha? be5 s mu* conte/1 or ) z mu* reason1 !y may call :atev] po9ts !y please su*1 h[ev] controv]t$1 & !n1 :at is said "h signifies no?+4 4 #cf4 ,prot4 ,be n mi/ak51 ,i pray3 especially conc]n+ ! ,*ur* ( ,engl&4 ,= ?\gh %e1 = sev]al ,po9ts1 impos$ =m]ly by ! ,tyranny ( ! ,roman ,*ur*1 ha? grant$ lib]ty ( ,op9ion1 or at lea/ fre$ h] ,subjects f obligation to believe s 9 !m1 z ! ,*ur* =m]ly requir$2 yet z to exclusion ( y\r ,doctr91 %e pr(esse? firmly to believe ! ?ree ,cre$s2 & conc]n+ ! ,additions made 9 ! two latt] ,cre$s to ! fir/1 ,dr4 ,hammond#ih ackn[l$ge?1----,t !y be+ ?us settl$ by ! ,univ]sal ,*ur*1 71 & /ill are 9 all reason1 )\t disput+1 to be receiv$ & embrac$ by ! ,prote/ant ,*ur*1 & e meek ,memb] !re(1 ) t rev]5ce t is due to ,apo/olick ,tru?s2 ) t ?ankfulness :i* is our meet tribute to ^? sacr$ ,*ampions1 = _! seasonable1 & provid5t propugn+ our fai?1 ) su* timely & necess>y application to practice1 t ! ,holy ,gho/1 speak+ to u n[1 "u ! times ( ! ,new ,te/am5t by ! ,gov]nors ( ! ,*ri/ian ,*ur*es1 7,*ri/s m$iate successors 9 ! ,prophetick1 ,pa/oral1 ,episcopal ,(fice7 z he _h =m]ly spok5 by ! ,prophets ( ! ,old ,te/am5t1 s5t imm$iately by him1 may f9d a *e]ful audi5ce1 & receive all uni=m submission f u4 ,?us1 ,dr4 ,hammond ( ! ,*ur* ( ,engl&'s ass5t to ! ?ree ,cre$s4 ,%e ass5te? also to ! def9itions ( ! f\r fir/ ,g5]al ,c\ncils3 ,& ! ,act #a ,eliz4#ii decl>es ,h]esie t1 :i* ha? be5 adjudg$ s by !m2 n[ 9 ! def9itions ( ^! #d fir/ ,g5]al ,c\ncils y\r t55t ha? receiv$ a ,mortal w\nd4 ,b la/ly1 ! #d? ,canon 9 ! ,engli% ,synod held #afdj4ajj p>ticul>ly /iles ,soc9ianism a mo/ damnable & curs$ ,h]esie1 & contr>y to ! ,articles ( ,religion e/abli%$ 9 ! ,*ur* ( ,engl&3 & ord]s t any1 convict$ ( x1 be excommunicat$ & n absolv$1 b ^u 8 rep5tance & abjuration4 ,n[ fur!r ?an ?is namely1 excommunication ^u conviction4 ,no o!r ,*ur* ,i suppose ha?1 or c proce$ aga9/ y\r ,h]esie2 ,x be+ receiv$ z a common ,axiom 9 ! ,canon law2 t ,ecclesia non judicat de occultis1----,&----,cogitationis pnam nemo patitur4----,&----,ob peccatum m]e int]num ,ecclesia/ica c5sura f]ri non pote/4 ,& 9 all ,*ur*es e "o1 ( :at int]nal p]swasion soev]1 cont9ues ext]nally at lea/ a memb] !re(1 till ! ,*ur*'s c5sures d exclude him4 4 #cg4 ,soc4 ,! ,*ur* ( ,engl& all[e?1 ass5te? to1 & tea*e?1 :at %e judge? evid5t 9 ! ,scripture2 = s %e ought2 :at %e believes1 or ass5te? to1 ,i look n aft]1 b :at %e enjoyns4 ,n[ ,i yield all t ob$i5ce 9 ?is po9t1 t %e requires f me2 & s ,i presume %e w ackn[l$ge me a dutiful ,son4 ,prot4 ,:at ob$i5ce :5 z y d5y "o ( h] *iefe/1 & mo/ fundam5tal doctr9s8 ,soc4 ,if ,i mi/ake n h] pr9ciples1 %e requires ( me no int]nal belief or ass5t to any ( h] doctr9s1 b only1 #a/4 ,sil5ce1 or non-contradiction or #bly1 a conditional belief1 i4e4 :5ev] ,i %all be conv9c$ ( ! tru? !re(4 ,n[ 9 bo? ^! ,i mo/ readily obey h]4 ,= ! #a/1 ,i h /rictly obs]v$ x1 kept my op9ion to my self2 unless ?is my disc\rse ) y ha? be5 a brea* ( x2 b !n ,i 0 at lea/ a dutiful subject ( ?is ,*ur* at ! beg9n+ ( our disc\rse2 & = ! #b;d1 :e!r actual conviction1 or suffici5t proposal1 be made ! condition ( my ass5t1 or submission ( judgm5t1 ,i am consci\s to my self ( no disob$i5ce1 z to ei!r ( ^!2 = an actual conviction ,i am sure ,i h n3 &1 suppos+1 t ,i h _h a suffici5t proposal1 & d n "k x1 my ob$i5ce1 ^u ! ,prote/ant pr9ciples1 c possibly advance no fur!r1 ?an x n[ do?4 ,! ,apo/les ,cre$ ,i totally embrace1 & w\ld h x ! /&+ b\nd ( a ,*ri/ian ,fai?4 ,= o!r ,cre$s3 ,i suppose1 no m belief is necess>y to ! ,articles ( ! ,nic5e ,cre$1 ?an is requir$ to ^? ( ! ,a?anasian4 ,&1 ( :at k9d ! necessity is ( believ+ ^?1 ,dr4 ,/ill+fleet /ates on ?is mann] #aja----,t ! belief ( a ?+ may be suppos$ necess>y1 ei!r z to ! matt]1 because ! matt] is to be believ$ 9 x self necess>y2 or because ( ! cle> conviction ( m5s und]/&+s2 t1 ?\gh ! matt]s be n 9 !mselves necess>y1 yet be+ reveal$ by ,god1 !y mu/ be explicitly believ$3 b !n1 ! necessity ( ?is belief do? ext5d no fur!r1 ?an ! cle>ness ( ! conviction do?4 ,aga91 t ! necessity ( believ+ any ?+ aris+ f ! ,*ur*'s def9ition ^u :i* motive y seem to press ! belief ( ! ,article ( ,consub/antiality do? dep5d ^u ! ,conviction1 t :atev] ! ,*ur* def9es is necess>y to be believ$4 ,&1 :]e t is n receiv$ z an antec$5t pr9ciple1 ! o!r _c be suppos$4 ,n[ ?is pr9ciple nei!r ,i1 nor yet ,prote/ants1 accept4 ,!n he concludes----,t z to ! ,a?anasian ,cre$ & ! same x is = ! ,nic5e4 ,x is unreasonable to imag9e1 t ! ,*ur* ( ,engl& do? own ?is necessity1 purely on ! acc\nt ( ! ,*ur*'s def9ition ( ^? ?+s :i* are n fundam5tal1 x be+ directly contr>y to h] s5se 9 h] #ai? & #bj? ,articles4 ,n[1 :i* ,articles ( ?is ,cre$ are n ,fundam5tal1 %e def9es no?+2 nor d ! #ai1 #bj1 or #ba4 ,articles own a necessity ( believ+ ! ,*ur*'s ,def9itions1 ev5 z to ,fundam5tals4 ,& h5ce1 t ! suppos$ necessity ( ! belief ( ! ,articles ( ! ,a?anasian ,cre$ mu/1 accord+ to ! s5se ( ! ,*ur* ( ,engl&1 be resolv$1 ei!r into ! necessity ( ! matt]s1 or into t necessity1 :i* suppose? cle> conviction1 t ! ?+s !re9 conta9$ are ( div9e ,revelation4 ,?us he4 ,n[1 = s _m ,articles z ,i am ei!r conv9c$ ( ! matt] to be believ$1 t x is 9 x self necess>y2 or1 t !y are div9e ,revelations1 ,i d mo/ readily yield my ,fai?1 & ass5t !reto4 ,n[1 to make "s ,reply to ! o!r ?+s y h object$4 4 #ch4 ,! ,act #a ,eliz4 all[s no ,def9itions ( ! ,fir/ ,g5]al ,c\ncils 9 decl>+ ,h]esie1 b ) ?is limitation1 t1 9 su* ,c\ncils1 su* ?+ be decl>$ ,h]esie by ! express & pla9 words ( ! ,canonical ,scripture4 ,on :i* t]ms ,i also accept !m4 4 #ci4 ,dr4 ,hammond's affirm+1 ,t all additions settl$ by ! ,univ]sal ,*ur* he means ,g5]al ,c\ncils are 9 all reason1 )\t disput+1 to be receiv$ z ,apo/olical ,tru?s1 t ! ,holy ,gho/ speak+ to u by ! ,gov]nors ( ! ,*ri/ian ,*ur*es1 ,*ri/'s ,successors1 may receive all uni=m submission f u1 suits n ) ! ,prote/ant ,pr9ciples (t5 =m]ly m5tion$4#ajb ,= ?us 7if ,i rightly und]/& him7 all ! def9itions ( ,g5]al ,c\ncils1 & ( ! ,*ri/ian ,gov]nors 9 all ages1 z ^! be+ /ill ,*ri/'s ,successors1 are to be )\t disput+1 embrac$ z tru?s ,apo/olical4 4 #dj4 ,if ! words ( ! f\r? ,canon ( ! ,engli% ,synod #afdj4 signifie any m1 ?an ?is2 ,t any p]son convict$ ( ,soc9ianism 7i4 e4 by publi%+ 8 op9ion7 %all1 ^u su* conviction1 be excommunicat$2 & if x be und]/ood adequate to ?is1 ,qui non cr$id]it filium esse homo\sion ,deo ,patri1 ,ana!ma sit1 &1 t ! ,*ur* ( ,engl&1 = all[+ h] ,communion1 is n cont5t ) sil5ce 9 respect ( ,soc9ianism1 b oblige? m5 also to ass5t to ! contr>y2 !n1 ,i see n ^u :at good gr\nds su* exclamation is made aga9/ ! l ,ana!ma's or exactions ( ass5t requir$ by t ( ,tr5t1 or o!r late ,c\ncils1 or by ,pius 8 ,bull4 ,if x be said "h1 ! reason ( su* fault+ !m is1 because ^! require ass5t1 n be+ lawful ,g5]al ,c\ncils1 su* reason w n pass2 #a/4 ,because1 nei!r ! ,engli% ,synod1 exact+ ass5t 9 ?is po9t1 is a ,g5]al ,c\ncil4 #bly4 ,because1 x is ! ,prote/ant t55t1 t nei!r may lawful ,g5]al ,c\ncils require ass5t to all _! ,def9itions4 ,or1 if x be affirm$ 7ei!r ( ,g5]al or ,prov9cial ,c\ncils7 t !y may require ass5t "u ,ana!ma to "s ( _! decrees2 viz4 ,^? evid5tly true1 & div9e ,revelations2 su* z ,consub/antiality is2 b may n to o!rs2 viz4 ,^? n manife/$ by !m to be su*2 !n1 be=e we c c5sure any ,c\ncil = its ,ana!ma's1 or its requir+ ( ass5t1 we mu/ "k1 :e!r ! po9t1 to :i* ass5t is requir$1 is1 or is n1 evid5t div9e ,revelation4 ,& !n1 by :om1 or h[1 %all ?is ?+ t\*+ ! evid5ce ( ! ,div9e ,revelation be judg$ or decid$8 = ^? t judge ?is1 :oev] !y be1 d sit n[ ^u ! trial ( ! rightness1 or mi/ake ( ! judgm5t ( a ,g5]al ,c\ncil3 ,or :51 ?9k we1 w ^? :o judge ?is 7i4e4 e p]son = himself7 agree 9 _! s5t5ce8 ,aga91 ,if on ! o!r side1 ! =m] ,*ur* 9 h] language1 ,si quis non cr$id]it1 c4 ,ana!ma sit1 be affirm$ 7to :i* purpose ! =e-m5tion$ ,axioms are urg$ by y7 to mean no?+ m1 ?an1 ,si quis ,hres9 suam palam pr(iteatur1 hujus pr(essionis convictus fu]it1 ,ana!ma sit1 ,?us ! ,prote/ants =m] qu>rel ) h] pass+ su* ,ana!ma's w be conclud$ causeless & unju/4 ,b inde$1 ?\gh1 7accord+ to ! =m] s5t5ces17 h] ,ana!ma is n ext5d$ to ! int]nal act ( hold+ su* an op9ion1 if :olly conceal$1 s f> z to r5d] su* p]son = x to /& excommunicat$1 & lie actually "u ?is c5sure ( ! ,*ur*1 because hi!rto no contempt ( h] au?ority appe>s1 nor is any dammage inf]r$ to any o!r memb] ( h] ,society !reby8 ,yet h] ,ana!ma also ext5ds1 ev5 to ! int]nal act1 or t5et1 aft] ! ,*ur*'s contr>y def9ition kn[n 7:i* t5et also !n is n held )\t a disob$i5ce1 & contempt ( h] au?ority7 s f>1 z to r5d] ! del9qu5t !re9 guilty ( a v great mortal s92 & s at ! same "t int]nally cut (f f be+ a true memb] ( ,*ri/'s ,body2 ?\gh ext]nally he is n z yet s cut (f4 ,& ! ,casui/s fur!r /ate him ipso facto to be excommunicat$1 be=e1 & )\t conviction1 if ext]nally he do?1 or speake? any ?+1 :]eby he is conv9cible2 & n if !re be any ?+ prov$ aga9/ him1 b if any ?+ at lea/ provable2 & su* a "o1 ^u ?is1 to be oblig$ 9 ,consci5ce1 n only to confess 8 h]etical op9ion1 = 8 be+ absolv$ f mortal s92 b also to seek a release f excommunication incurr$1 = 8 re-enjoy+ ! ,*ur*'s ,communion4 ,?us y see a rigor 9 ?is ,*ur* t[>ds :at x once acc\nt$ ,h]esie mu* diff]5t f ! m mild ,_s1 & mod]ate temp] ( ! ,re=m$4 4 #da4 ,to conclude4 ,= ! enjoy+ ! ,prote/ant ,communion1 ,i conceive t1 z to any necess>y approbation ( h] ,doctr9s1 x is suffici5t = me to hold ) ,mr4 ,*ill+wor? 7z ,i d#ajc7----,t ! ,doctr9 ( ,prote/ants1 ?\gh n t1 ( all ( !m1 absolutely true1 yet x is free f all impiety1 & f all ,error de/ructive to ,salvation1 or 9 x self damnable4 ,& #ajd----:atsoev] ha? be5 held necess>y to ,salvation by ! cons5t ( ,prote/ants1 or ev5 ( ! ,*ur* ( ,engl&1 :i* inde$ ha? giv5 no c]ta9 ,catalogue at all ( su* necess>ies1 t1 aga9/ ! ,soc9ians1 & all o!rs :atsoev]1 ,i d v]ily believe1 & embrace----,& 7:i* is /ill ! same7 #aje--;,i am p]swad$1 t ! con/ant doctr9 ( ! ,*ur* ( ,engl&1 is s pure & ,or?odox1 t :osoev] believes x1 & lives accord+ to x1 und\bt$ly he %all be sav$4 ,= if all tru?s necess>y to ,salvation be held 9 x1 !n1 s1 is no error1 opposite or de/ructive to ,salvation1 held by x2 & s1 liv+ accord+ to ! tru?s x holds1 ,i may be sav$4 ,aga9 #ajf----;,i believe t !re is no error 9 x1 :i* may necessitate1 or w>rant any man to di/urb ! peace1 or r5\nce ! ,communion ( x1 ,=1 ?\gh ,i believe ,antisoc9ianism1 an error2 ,yet if ,i hold x n su*1 z t = x any man may di/urb ! peace1 or ought to r5\nce ! ,communion ( ! ,*ur*1 ,i may pr(ess all ?is1 & yet hold ,soc9ianism4 ,la/ly z he1#ajg s ,i2----,propose me any ?+ out ( ! ,bible1 seem x nev] s incompreh5sible1 ,i w subscribe x ) h& & he>t4 ,9 o!r ?+s t ,i ?9k n conta9$ 9 ?is ,book ,i w take no mans lib]ty ( judgm5t f him1 nei!r %all any man take m9e f me2 = ,i am fully assur$1 t ,god do? n1 & !re=e t m5 ought n to require any m ( any man ?an ?is2 ,to believe ! ,scripture to be ,gods ,^w1 to endeav\r to f9d ! true s5se ( x2 & to live accord+ to x4 ,)\t p]t9acy ,i c be no ,h]etick2 ,&#ajh1 endeav\r+ to f9d ! true s5se ( ,scripture1 ,i _c b hold my error )\t p]t9acy1 & be ready to =sake x1 :5 a m true1 & a m probable s5se %all appe> unto me4----,& !n1 all necess>y tru? be+ pla9ly set d[n 9 ,scripture1 ,i am c]ta9 by believ+ ,scripture to believe all necess>y tru?2 & 9 do+ s1 my life be+ answ]able to my ,fai?1 h[ is x possible ,i %\ld fail ( ,salvation8 ,?us ,mr4 ,*ill+wor? speaks p]fectly my s5se4 ,prot4 ,i see no o!r cure = y2 b t y le>n humility & mortification ( y\r ,und]/&+ 79 :i* lies ! mo/ subtle & p]il\s ( all ,prides73 ,&1 ,x w r$uce y to ,ob$i5ce3 & ?is to ,tru?4 ,t1 ) all ! ,*ur* ( ,god1 y may give glory to ,god ! only begott5 ,son1 & ! ,holy ,gho/1 coess5tial ) ,god ! ,fa!r4 ,to :i* ,tr9ity 9 ,unity1 z x ha? be5 f ! beg9n+1 & is n[1 s %all all ,hon\r & ,glory be giv5 ?r\gh\t all future ages4 ,am54 #ha ,dr4 ,pott] p4 #ge4 #hb ,*ill+w4 p4 #bgd4 #hc ,lawd4 p4 #adb4 #hd p4 #cca4 #he ,/ill+4 ib4 #hf ,v9dic4 ( ! ,*ur* ( ,eng4 p4 #i4 #hg ,d4 ,pott] p4 #gf4 #hh ,/ill+fl4 p4 #cei4 #hi ,division ( ,*ur*es4 p4 #ajf4 #ij ,*ill+w4 p4 #bgh4 #ia ,ib4 #bgi4 #ib ,( ,s*ism1 p4 #bc1 #bd1 #be4 #ic p4 #gc4 #id ,/ill+fl4 p4 #bib4 #ie p4 #ajj4 #if ,s*ism gu>d$1 p4 #aib4 #ig p4 #bjj4 #ih ,( ,fundam5tals4 p4 #ij4 #ii cap4 #a4 #ajj ,c4 #d4 #aja p4 #gj1 #ga4 #ajb ,see be=e 4 #bf4 #ajc ,*ill+w4 ,pref4 4 #ci4 #ajd ,ib4 4 #bh4 #aje ,ib4 4 #bi4 #ajf ,ibid4 #ajg ,*ill+w4 p4 #cgf4 #ajh ,ib4 4 #eg4 ,,f9is4 ,,errata4 ,page #ai4 l94 #ah4 read ,emp]or4 p4 #bh4 l4 #a4 dele ,see m ,prote/ants cit$ to ?is purpose1 ,disc4 #c4 4 #ai4 pag4 #ca1 l4 #g4 r4 !re by4