,,!ology ,,& ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,a ,,/udy ,,( ,,! ,,relations ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,to ,,!ology ,,by ,,h5ry ,,*ur*ill ,,k+ ,,pr(essor ,,( ,,!ology ,,& ,,philosophy ,,9 ,,ob]l9 ,,college ,,second ,,edition ,,hodd] ,,/\ghton ,,new ,,york ,,george ,h4 ,,doran ,,company ,,copyright1 #aijb ,,by ,,! ,,macmillan ,,company ,set up & electrotyp$ ,septemb]1 #aijb ,repr9t$ ,febru>y1 #aijd2 ,july1 #aijg2 ,augu/1 #aiaj2 ,april1 #aiab4 ,to ! ,memb]s ( ! ,h>v>d ,summ] ,s*ool ( ,!ology ,,( ,,! ,,ye> #aija ,,9 ,,recognition ,,( ,,_! ,,int]e/ ,,9 ,,! ,,lectures ,,t ,,=m$ ,,! ,,basis ,,( ,,?is ,,book ,,preface ,!re is no attempt 9 ?is book to pres5t a complete sy/em ( !ology1 ?\gh mu* ( su* a sy/em is pass$ 9 review1 b only to /udy a special phase ( !ological ?9k+4 ,! precise !me ( ! book is ! relations ( ! social consci\sness to !ology4 ,?is is ! subject ^u :i* ! writ] 0 ask$ to lecture at ! ,h>v>d ,summ] ,s*ool ( ,!ology ( #aija2 & ! book has gr[n out ( ! lectures !re giv54 ,9 prep>+ ! book = ! press1 h[ev]1 ! lecture =m has be5 entirely ab&on$1 & consid]able mat]ial add$4 ,! importance ( ! !me seems to ju/ify a some:at ?or\gh-go+ treatm5t4 ,if "o believes at all 9 ! pres5ce ( ,god 9 hi/ory--& ! ,*ri/ian c h no d\bt "h--he mu/ be pr(\ndly int]e/$ 9 su* a ph5om5on z ! /eady gr[? ( ! social consci\sness4 ,h>dly any inn] *>act]i/ic ( our "t has a /rong] hi/orical ju/ification ?an t consci\sness2 & x has c>ri$ ! reason & consci5ce ( ! m5 ( ?is g5]ation 9 r>e degree4 ,hav+ its own comp>atively indep5d5t developm5t1 & yet mak+ an e?ical dem& t is ?or\ghly ,*ri/ian1 x furni%es an almo/ ideal /&po9t f :i* to review our !ological /atem5ts1 &1 at ! same "t1 a valuable te/ ( _! really ,*ri/ian quality4 ,9 attempt+1 !n1 a c>eful /udy ( ! relations ( ! social consci\sness to !ology1 ?is book aims1 fir/1 def9itely to get at ! real mean+ ( ! social consci\sness z ! !ologian mu/ view x1 & s to br+ cle>ly into m9d ! unconsci\s assumptions ( ! social consci\sness itself2 & !n to trace out ! influ5ce ( ! social consci\sness ^u ! conception ( religion1 & ^u !ological doctr9e4 ,! l>g] portion ( ! book is naturally giv5 to ! influ5ce ^u !ological doctr9e2 & to make ! discussion "h z po9t$ z possible1 ! diff]5t elem5ts ( ! social consci\sness are consid]$ sep>ately4 ,x %\ld be not$1 h[ev]1 t ! "q rais$ is n ! hi/orical "o1 ,h[1 z a matt] ( fact1 has ! social consci\sness modifi$ ! conception ( religion or ! /atem5t ( !ological doctr9e8 b ! !oretical "o1 ,h[ %\ld ! social consci\sness naturally affect religion & doctr9e8 ,9 ?is s5se1 ! result might be call$1 9 ,presid5t ,hyde's phrase1 a social !ology2 b1 z ,i believe t ! social consci\sness is at bottom only a true s5se ( ! fully p]sonal1 ,i pref] myself to ?9k ( ! pres5t book z only c>ry+ out 9 m detail ! cont5tion ( my ,recon/ruction 9 ,!ology--t !ology %\ld aim at a re/atem5t ( doctr9e 9 /rictly p]sonal t]ms4 ,s conceiv$1 9 spite ( its casual orig91 ?is book foll[s v naturally ^u ! previ\s book4 ,"s ( ! same topics necess>ily recur "h2 & ref]5ces to ! ,recon/ruction h be5 freely made1 9 ord] to avoid all unnecess>y repetition4 ,t ?is social s5se ( ! fully p]sonal has f9ally a real & def9ite contribution to make to !ology1 ,i _c d\bt4 ,i c only hope t ! pres5t discussion may be f\nd at lea/ sugge/ive1 p>ticul>ly 9 ! analysis ( ! social consci\sness1 & 9 ! treatm5t ( my/icism & ( ! e?ical 9 religion1 z well z 9 ! consid]ation ( ! special influ5ce ( ! elem5ts ( ! social consci\sness ^u ! re/atem5t ( doctr9e4 ,( ! doctr9al applications1 ! application to ! problem ( r$emption may be consid]$1 p]haps1 ( mo/ significance4 ,,h5ry ,,*ur*ill ,,k+4 ,,ob]l9 ,,college1 ,june1 #aijb4 ,,cont5ts ,,introduction ,,page ,,! ,,!me #a ,,! ,,real ,,mean+ ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,= ,,!ology ,,introduction ,,! ,,po9t ,,( ,,view ,,( ,,! ,,!ologian #e ,,*apt] ,i ,,! ,,def9ition ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness #i ,i4 ,! ,s5se ( ! ,l-,m9d$ness ( ,m5 #i ,,ii4 ,! ,s5se ( ! ,mutual ,influ5ce ( ,m5 #aa #a4 ,contribut+ ,l9es ( ,?\ght #aa #b4 ,! ,?reefold ,=m ( ! ,conviction #ac ,,iii4 ,! ,s5se ( ! ,value & ,sacr$ness ( ! ,p]son #af ,,iv4 ,! ,s5se ( ,obligation #ah ,v4 ,! ,s5se ( ,love #bj ,,*apt] ,,ii ,,! ,,inadequacy ,,( ,,! ,,analogy ,,( ,,! ,,organism ,,z ,,an ,,expression ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness #bc ,i4 ,! ,value ( ! ,analogy #bc ,,ii4 ,! ,inevitable ,inadequacy ( ! ,analogy #bd #a4 ,x ,comes f ! ,sub-p]sonal ,_w #bd #b4 ,access to ,reality1 ,only ,?r\gh ,ourselves #bd #c4 ,mi/ak5 ,passion = ,con/ru+ ,ev]y?+ #be ,,iii4 ,! ,analogy ,te/$ by ! ,def9ition ( ! ,social ,consci\sness #bg ,,*apt] ,,iii ,,! ,,necessity ,,( ,,! ,,facts ,,( ,,:i* ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,is ,,! ,,reflection1 ,,if ,,ideal ,,int]e/s ,,are ,,to ,,be ,,supreme #bi ,i4 ,! ,"q #bi ,,ii4 ,o!rwise1 ,no ,moral ,_w at all #cj #a4 ,! ,pr]equisites ( a ,moral ,_w #cj 7#a7 ,a ,sph]e ( ,law #cj 7#b7 ,e?ical ,fre$om #cj 7#c7 ,"s ,p[] ( ,accompli%m5t #ca 7#d7 ,memb]s ,"o ( ,ano!r #cb #b4 ,! ,ideal ,_w ,requires1 ?us1 ! ,facts ( ! ,social ,consci\sness #cb ,,*apt] ,,iv ,,! ,,ultimate ,,explanation ,,& ,,gr\nd ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness #ce ,i4 ,h[ c x be1 ,metaphysically1 t we d ,influ5ce ,"o ,ano!r8 #ce #a4 ,n ,due to ! ,physical ,fact ( ,race-,connection #cf #b4 ,we are n to ,ov]-,emphasize ! ,pr9ciple ( ,h]$ity #cg #c4 ,n ,due to a ,my/ical ,solid>ity #ci #d4 ,gr\nd$ 9 ! ,imman5ce ( ,god #dj ,,ii4 ,:at is ,requir$ = ! ,f9al ,positive ,ju/ification ( ! ,social ,consci\sness1 z ,e?ical8 #dd #a4 ,mu/ be ,gr\nd$ 9 ! ,support+ ,w ( ,god #dd #b4 ,god's ,%>+ 9 our ,life #dh #c4 ,! ,consequ5t ,transfiguration ( ! ,social ,consci\sness #di ,,! ,,influ5ce ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,^u ,,! ,,conception ,,( ,,religion ,,introduction #ec ,,*apt] ,v ,,! ,,opposition ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,to ,,! ,,falsely ,,my/ical #ee ,i4 ,:at is ! ,falsely ,my/ical8 #ee #a4 ,na%'s ,def9ition #ee #b4 ,h]rmann's ,def9ition #ef ,,ii4 ,! ,objections ( ! ,social ,consci\sness to ! ,falsely ,my/ical #eg #a4 ,une?ical #eh #b4 ,does n ,give a ,really ,p]sonal ,god #eh #c4 ,belittles ! ,p]sonal 9 ,man #ei #d4 ,leaves ! ,hi/orically1 ,concretely ,*ri/ian #fb ,,*apt] ,,vi ,,! ,,emphasis ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,^u ,,! ,,p]sonal ,,relation ,,9 ,,religion1 ,,& ,,s ,,^u ,,! ,,truly ,,my/ical #ff ,i4 ,! ,social ,consci\sness ,t5ds ,positively to ,emphasize ! ,p]sonal ,relation 9 ,religion #ff #a4 ,emphasizes ,ev]y:]e ! ,p]sonal #ff #b4 ,requires ! ,laws ( a ,deep5+ ,fri5d%ip 9 ,religion #fg #c4 ,requires ! ,ideal ,conditions ( ! ,ri*e/ ,life 9 ,religion #fh ,,ii4 ,! ,social ,consci\sness ?us ,keeps ! ,truly ,my/ical #gj #a4 ,! ,ju/ifiable & ,unju/ifiable ,elem5ts 9 ,my/icism #ga 7#a7 ,emotion1 ! ,te/ #ga 7#b7 ,subjective ,t5d5cy #gb 7#c7 ,und]e/imat+ ! ,hi/orical #gb 7#d7 ,t5d5cy t[>d ,vagu5ess #gc 7#e7 ,t5d5cy t[>d ,pan!ism #gc 7#f7 ,t5d5cy to ,extravagant ,symbolism #gf #b4 ,! ,prote/ 9 ,favor ( ! ,:ole ,man #gh #c4 ,! ,self-,controll$ ,recognition ( ,emotion #hb ,,*apt] ,,vii ,,! ,,?or\gh ,,e?iciz+ ,,( ,,religion #hf ,i4 ,! ,pressure ( ! ,problem #hf ,,ii4 ,! ,/atem5t ( ! ,problem #hg ,,iii4 ,! ,answ] #hi #a4 ,involv$ 9 ,relation to ,*ri/ #hi #b4 ,! ,div9e ,w ,felt 9 ! ,e?ical ,comm& #ij #c4 ,involv$ 9 ! ,nature ( ,god's ,gifts #ia #d4 ,communion ) ,god1 ,?r\gh ,h>mony ) ,8 ,e?ical ,w #ib #e4 ,! ,vision ( ,god = ! ,pure 9 ,he>t #ib #f4 ,%>+ ! ,life ( ,god #ic #g4 ,*ri/1 z ,satisfy+ ,our ,highe/ ,claims on ,life #id #h4 ,! ,vision ( ! ,ri*es ( ! ,life ( ,*ri/1 ,e?ically ,condition$ #if #i4 ,! ,moral ,law1 z a ,revelation ( ! ,love ( ,god #ih ,,*apt] ,,viii ,,! ,,emphasis ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,^u ,,! ,,hi/orically ,,*ri/ian #ajb ,i4 ,! ,social ,consci\sness ,ne$s ,hi/orical ,ju/ification #ajb ,,ii4 ,*ri/ianity's ,response to ?is ,ne$ #ajc ,,! ,,influ5ce ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,^u ,,!ological ,,doctr9e ,,*apt] ,,ix ,,g5]al ,,results #aje ,i4 ,! ,conception ( ,!ology 9 ,p]sonal ,t]ms #ajf ,,ii4 ,! ,fa!rhood ( ,god1 z ! ,det]m9+ ,pr9ciple 9 ,!ology #aji ,,iii4 ,*ri/'s ,own ,social ,emphases #aaa ,,iv4 ,! ,reflection 9 ,!ology ( ! ,*anges 9 ! ,conception ( ,religion #aac ,,*apt] ,x ,,! ,,influ5ce ,,( ,,! ,,deep5+ ,,s5se ,,( ,,! ,,l-,,m9d$ness ,,( ,,m5 ,,^u ,,!ology #aae ,i4 ,no ,prime ,favorites ) ,god #aaf ,,ii4 ,! ,great ,univ]sal ,qualities & ,int]e/s1 ! ,mo/ ,valuable #aag ,,iii4 ,ess5tial ,lik5ess ,"u v ,div]se ,=ms #aba ,,iv4 ,z ,appli$ to ! ,"q ( ,immortality #abd ,v4 ,consequ5t ,l>g] ,sympa?y ) ,m51 ,fai? 9 ,m51 & ,hope = ,m5 #abg ,,vi4 ,judgm5t ,accord+ to ,light1 & ! ,moral ,reality ( ! ,future ,life #acb ,,*apt] ,,xi ,,! ,,influ5ce ,,( ,,! ,,deep5+ ,,s5se ,,( ,,! ,,mutual ,,influ5ce ,,( ,,m5 ,,^u ,,!ology #acf ,i4 ,! ,real ,unity ( ! ,race #acf ,,ii4 ,deep5+ ! ,s5se ( ,s9 #aci ,,iii4 ,mutual ,influ5ce = ,good 9 ! ,atta9m5t ( ,"* #ade #a4 ,application to ! ,problem ( ,r$emption #adg #b4 ,! ,consequ5t ,e?ical & ,spiritual ,mean+ ( ,sub/itution & ,propitiation #aej ,,iv4 ,mutual ,influ5ce = ,good 9 our ,p]sonal ,relation to ,god #afj #a4 ,9 ,com+ into ! ,k+dom #afj #b4 ,9 ,fell[%ip )9 ! ,k+dom #afb #c4 ,9 ,int]cessory ,pray] #afd ,v4 ,mutual ,influ5ce = ,good 9 ,confessions ( ,fai? #afg #a4 ,complete ,uni=mity ( ,belief & ,/atem5t ,impossible #afi #b4 ,complete ,uni=mity ( ,belief & ,/atem5t ,undesirable #aga ,,vi4 ,! ,consequ5t ,importance ( ! ,doctr9e ( ! ,*ur* #agg ,,*apt] ,,xii ,,! ,,influ5ce ,,( ,,! ,,deep5+ ,,s5se ,,( ,,! ,,value ,,& ,,sacr$ness ,,( ,,! ,,p]son ,,^u ,,!ology #agi ,i4 ,! ,recognition ( ! ,p]sonal 9 ,man #ahj #a4 ,man's ,p]sonal ,sep>at5ess f ,god #ahj #b4 ,emphasis ^u ,man's ,moral ,initiative #aha #c4 ,man1 a ,*ild ( ,god #ahc ,,ii4 ,! ,recognition ( ! ,p]sonal 9 ,*ri/ #ahd #a4 ,*ri/1 a ,p]sonal ,revelation ( ,god #ahd #b4 ,emphasiz+ ! ,moral & ,spiritual 9 ,ass]t+ ! ,supremacy ( ,*ri/ #ahe #c4 ,! ,moral & ,spiritual ,gr\nds ( ! ,supremacy ( ,*ri/ #ahh 7#a7 ,! ,greate/ 9 ! ,greate/ ,sph]e #ahh 7#b7 ,! ,s9less & ,imp5it5t ,"o #aib 7#c7 ,consci\sly ,rises to ! ,highe/ ,ideal #aid 7#d7 ,realizes ! ,"* ( ,god #aie 7#e7 ,consci\sly ,able to ,r$eem ,all ,m5 #aif 7#f7 ,complete ,normality "u ?is ,transc5d5t ,god-,consci\sness & ,s5se ( ,mission #aig 7#g7 ,! ,only ,p]son ,:o c call out ,absolute ,tru/ #aih 7#h7 ,! ,"o1 9 ,:om ,god ,c]ta9ly ,f9ds ,u #aii 7#i7 ,! ,ideal ,realiz$ #bjj #d4 ,*ri/'s ,d\ble ,uniqu5ess #bja #e4 ,! ,increas+ ,s5se ( ,our ,k9%ip ) ,*ri/1 & ( ,8 ,reality #bje ,,iii4 ,! ,recognition ( ! ,p]sonal 9 ,god4 #bjg #a4 ,! ,/eady ,c>ry+ ,?r\gh ( ! ,completely ,p]sonal 9 ! ,conception ( ,god4 ,gu>d+ ! ,conception #bjh #b4 ,god is ,always ! ,completely ,p]sonal ,god #bab 7#a7 ,consequ5t ,relation ( ,god to ,et]nal ,tru?s #bab 7#b7 ,et]nal ,creation #bad 7#c7 ,! ,unity & ,un*angeabl5ess ( ,god #baf 7#d7 ,! ,limitations ( ! ,conception ( ,imman5ce #bag #c4 ,deep5+ ! ,?\ght ( ! ,fa!rhood ( ,god #bah 7#a7 ,hi/ory1 no ,m]e ,natural ,process #bah 7#b7 ,god1 ! ,great ,s]vant #bai 7#c7 ,no ,div9e ,arbitr>9ess #bbj 7#d7 ,! ,passibility ( ,god #bba #d4 ,z to ! ,doctr9e ( a ,social ,tr9ity #bbb #e4 ,prem95t ,rev]5ce = ,p]sonality1 ,*>act]iz+ all ,god's ,relations ) ,m5 #bbf 7#a7 ,reflect$ 9 ,*ri/ #bbf 7#b7 ,9 ,creation #bcj 7#c7 ,9 ,provid5ce #bcb 7#d7 ,9 ,our ,p]sonal ,religi\s ,life #bcc 7#e7 ,9 ! ,judgm5t #bcg 7#f7 ,9 ! ,future ,life #bdj ,,!ology ,,& ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,introduction ,,! ,,!me ,no !ologian c be excus$ to-day f a c>eful /udy ( ! relations ( !ology & ! social consci\sness4 ,:e!r ?is /udy becomes a =mal inve/igation or n1 ! social consci\sness is s deep & significant a ph5om5on 9 ! e?ical life ( our "t1 t x _c be ignor$ by ! !ologian :o means to br+ 8 message to m5 really home4 ,?is book is writt5 9 ! conviction t1 :ile m5 are ?us mov$ z nev] be=e by a deep s5se ( mutual influ5ce & obligation1 !y h also z deep & g5u9e an int]e/ z ev] 9 ! really greate/ que/ions ( religion & !ology4 ,int]e/s s significant & s ak9 _c long rema9 isolat$ 9 ! m9d4 ,!y are c]ta9 soon pr(\ndly to influ5ce ea* o!r4 ,& ?is mutual influ5ce ( !ology & ! social consci\sness =m ! !me ( ?is book4 ,two que/ions are naturally involv$ 9 ?is !me4 ,fir/3 ,has !ology giv5 any help1 or has x any help to give1 to ! social consci\sness8--! "q ( ! fir/ division ( ! book4 ,second3 ,has ! social consci\sness made any contribution1 or has x any contribution to make1 to !ology8--! "q ( ! second & ?ird divisions4 ,t is to say3 ,on ! "o h&1 ,h ! great facts :i* !ology /udies any help to give to ! man :o faces ! problem ( social progress--( ! /eady elevation ( ! race8 ,on ! o!r h&1 ,has ! great fact ( ! imm5sely quick5$ social consci\sness ( our "t1 ) all t x means1 any help to give to ! !ologian 9 8 attempt to br+ ! great ,*ri/ian tru?s really home to m51 to make !m m real1 m rational1 m vital8 ,or aga93 ,on ! "o h&1 d !ological doctr9es--! mo/ adequate /atem5ts we c make ( ! great ,*ri/ian tru?s--be/ expla9 & be/ gr\nd ! social consci\sness1 s z be/ to br+ our entire ?\ght 9 ?is sph]e ( ! social into unity8 ,is ! ,*ri/ian tru? s great t x n only includes all t is true 9 ?is new social consci\sness--is fully able to take x up into itself & to make x feel at home !re--b also1 s great t x alone c give ! social consci\sness its fulle/ mean+1 alone enable x to und]/& itself1 & alone furni% x adequate motive & p[]8 ,is ! social consci\sness1 9 tru?1 only a disguis$ /atem5t ( ,*ri/ian convictions1 & does x really require ! ,*ri/ian religion & its ?\ghtful expression to complete itself8 ,mu/ ! social consci\sness say1 :5 x comes to full self-k1--,i am myself an unmean+ & unju/ifi$ by-product1 if !re is n a ,god 9 ! full ,*ri/ian s5se8 &1 s say+1 confirm aga9 ! great ,*ri/ian tru?s8 ,?is is ! "q ( ! fir/ division4 ,on ! o!r h&1 s9ce ! task ( any giv5 !ologian is necess>ily tempor>y1 & s9ce any m>k$ modification ( ! consci\sness ( m5 w inevitably dem& "s re/atem5t ( !ological doctr9e1 ! "q "h becomes--,to :at *ang$ po9ts ( view 9 religion & !ology1 to :at re/atem5ts ( doctr9e1 & s to :at tru] appreciation ( ,*ri/ian tru?1 does ! new social consci\sness naturally lead8 ,h[ d ! affirmations ( ! social consci\sness1 z ! outcome ( a c>eful1 inductive /udy ( ! social evolution ( ! race1 affect our !ological /atem5ts8 ,?is is ! "q ( ! second & ?ird divisions ( ! book4 ,our discussion mu/ ( c\rse assume & build on ! conclusions ( sociology1 & ( ,new ,te/am5t !ology1 especially ! conclusions conc]n+ ! social tea*+ ( ,jesus4 ,,! ,,real ,,mean+ ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,= ,,!ology ,,introduction ,,! ,,po9t ,,( ,,view ,,( ,,! ,,!ologian ,fir/1 !n1 :at is ! real mean+ ( ! social consci\sness1 z ! !ologian mu/ view x8 ,! answ] to ?is "q involves a prelim9>y "o3 ,:at is ! po9t ( view ( ! !ologian 9 any inve/igation8 ,"o c only give 8 own answ]4 ,fir/ ( all1 ! !ologian1 z su*1 is an int]pret]1 n a trac] ( causal connections4 ,he builds ev]y:]e ^u ! sci5tific inve/igator1 & takes f him ! /atem5t ( facts & processes4 ,) ^! he has prim>ily no?+ to d4 ,) ref]5ce to ! social consci\sness1 !re=e1 he does n attempt to d ov] aga9 ! "w ( ! sociologi/2 he asks only1 ,:at does ! social consci\sness1 9 ! light ( ! :ole ( life & ?\ght1 mean2 n1 ,h[ did x come ab\t8 ,! !ologian1 too1 is a believ] 9 ! supremacy ( spiritual int]e/s2 ?is is 8 c5tral cont5tion4 ,he affirms /r5u\sly1 ) ! sci5tific work]1 ! place & value ( ! me*anical2 b he is c]ta9 t ! me*anical c und]/& itself ev51 only z x is se5 to be simple means1 & ?us cle>ly subord9ate 9 significance4 ,8 problem is1 !re=e1 ev]y:]e1 t ( ideal int]pretation1 n ( me*anical explanation4 ,b1 :ile he has no?+ to d ) ! sci5tific trac+ ( imm$iate causal connections1 he recognizes causality itself z requir+ an ultimate explanation1 t _c be me*anically giv54 ,! !ologian mu/ be 9 ?is1 !n1 an ideal int]pret]1 & an inquir] aft] ! ultimate cause4 ,! !ologian assumes1 moreov]1 ! legitimacy & value ( ! fact ( religion2 = !ology is simply ! ?\ghtful1 compreh5sive1 & unifi$ expression ( :at religion means to u4 ,! mean+ ( ! social consci\sness to ! !ologian involves1 !re=e1 at once ! "q ( its relation to religi\s conviction4 ,! po9t ( view ( ! ,*ri/ian !ologian involves1 besides1 ! reality ( ! p]sonal ,god 9 p]sonal relation to p]sons4 ,!ology is 9 e>ne/ 9 its ?\ght ( ,god1 & kn[s t ,god is ev]y:]e to be tak5 into acc\nt2 t1 if !re is a ,god at all1 he is n to be exil$ into "s corn] ( 8 univ]se1 b is intimately conc]n$ 9 all1 is at ! v he>t ( all2 & t1 !re=e1 x is n a matt] ( m]ely curi\s int]e/ or ( subsidi>y inquiry1 :e!r we are to look at our que/ions ) ,god 9 m9d4 ,f9ally1 ! ,*ri/ian !ologian tries ev]y:]e to make 8 po9t ( view ! po9t ( view ( ,*ri/4 ,! !ology1 ^u :i* he ultimately /akes 8 all1 is ,*ri/'s !ology4 ,he kn[s t !re is mu* conc]n+ :i* he _c refuse to ?9k1 b ^u :i* ,*ri/ has n express$ himself ei!r explicitly or by cle> inf]5ce2 b 9 all ?is unavoidable supplem5t>y ?9k+ he aims to be absolutely loyal to ! _s ( ,*ri/4 ,f ?is po9t ( view ( ! ,*ri/ian !ologian1 n[1 :at does ! social consci\sness mean8 ,! answ] may be giv5 "u f\r heads3 7#a7 ! def9ition ( ! social consci\sness2 7#b7 ! inadequacy ( ! analogy ( ! organism1 z an expression ( ! social consci\sness2 7#c7 ! necessity ( ! facts1 ( :i* ! social consci\sness is ! reflection1 if ideal int]e/s are to be supreme2 7#d7 ! ultimate explanation & gr\nd ( ! social consci\sness4 ,^! f\r topics =m ! subjects ( ! f\r *apt]s ( ! fir/ division ( our inquiry4 ,,*apt] ,i ,,! ,,def9ition ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,! simple/ & probably ! mo/ accurate s+le expression we c give to ! social consci\sness1 is to say t x is a gr[+ s5se ( ! real bro!rhood ( m54 ,b five elem5ts seem pla9ly involv$ 9 ?is1 & may be pr(itably sep>at$ 9 our ?\ght1 if t is to be cle> & def9ite3--a deep5+ s5se 7#a7 ( ! lik5ess or l-m9d$ness ( m51 7#b7 ( _! mutual influ5ce1 7#c7 ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son1 7#d7 ( mutual obligation1 & 7#e7 ( love4 ,i4 ,,! ,,s5se ,,( ,,! ,,l-,,m9d$ness ,,( ,,m5#a ,if a society is a gr\p ( l-m9d$ individuals1 if ! all-ess5tial requisites = cop]ation are l-m9d$ness & consci\sness ( k9d1 z ,gidd+s tells u1 !n c]ta9ly a prime elem5t 9 ! social consci\sness is lik5ess & ! s5se ( x--a gr[+ s5se ( ! m5tal & moral resemblance & pot5tial resemblance ( all m51 & ( all classes ( m51 ?\gh n equality ( p[]s4 ,equality ( ne$ among m51 too1#b to :i* sociology comes z "o ( its sure/ conclusions1 implies a common capacity1 ev5 if 9 v>y+ degrees1 to ent] into ! mo/ fundam5tal int]e/s ( life1 & s po9ts unmi/akably to ! ess5tial lik5ess ( m5 9 ! mo/ important ?+s4 ,s1 too1 sociology's unque/ion+ ass]tion t bo? small] & l>g] gr\ps ( m5 con/antly t5d t[>d unity1 assumes pot5tial resemblance4 ,& ! uni=m exp]i5ce & prescription ( social work]s1 t really kn[+ h[ ! o!r half lives br+s increas+ sympa?y1 also affirm ! fundam5tal lik5ess ( m54 ,e pa9/ak+ inve/igation ( a social "q comes out at "s po9t or o!r ) a fre% discov]y ( a previ\sly hidd51 und]ly+ resemblance betwe5 classes ( m54 ,f ! c>eful1 inductive /udy ( social evolution1 too1 ! m5 ( our day see1 z no o!r g5]ation has se51 t ! great =ce always & ev]y:]e at "w 9 t evolution has be5 lik5ess & ! consci\sness ( x4 ,= all ^! reasons1 ?is g5]ation believes1 z m5 nev] believ$ be=e1 9 ! ess5tial l-m9d$ness ( m52 & ?is deep5+ s5se ( ! l-m9d$ness ( m5 is c]ta9ly "o elem5t 9 ! mod]n social consci\sness4 ,,ii4 ,,! ,,s5se ,,( ,,! ,,mutual ,,influ5ce ,,( ,,m5 ,a second elem5t 9 ! social consci\sness1 &1 p]haps1 t :i* has mo/ ( all *>act]iz$ x ?r\gh ! l>g] p]iod ( its gr[?1 is ! /rong s5se ( ! mutual influ5ce ( m5--t we are all memb]s "o ( ano!r4 #a4 ,contribut+ ,l9es ( ,?\ght4--,x is wor? see+ h[ firmly plant$ ! idea is4 ,sev]al l9es ( ?\ght h unit$ to induce m5 to emphasize--p]haps ev5 to ov]-emphasize--?is way ( ?9k+ ( society4 ,! influ5ce ( natural sci5ce1 9 ! fir/ place1 has be5 inevitably 9 ?is direction4 ,its root idea ( ! univ]sality ( law =ces ^u "o ! ?\ght ( a _w :i* is a coh]5t :ole1 a unity ) univ]sal =ces 9 x1 9 :i* e "p is inextricably connect$ ) e o!r4 ,s1 too1 ! acceptance ( ! !ory ( evolution has l$ sci5ce to reg>d ! :ole hi/ory ( ! physical univ]se z an organic gr[?4 ,psy*ology1 also1 ) its pres5t-day emphasis1 9 ,baldw9 & ,royce1 ^u ! con/ant pres5ce & fundam5tal "* ( imitation1 & its insi/5ce ^u ! /ill m fundam5tal impulsiv5ess ( consci\sness :i* ,dewey believes und]lies imitation1#c is really proclaim+ exactly ?is elem5t ( ! social consci\sness4 ,& ! :ole ass]tion by ! lat] psy*ology ( ! unity ( man--m9d & body1 & ( ! complex int]tw9+ ( all ! functions ( ! m9d1 is 9 close/ h>mony ) a simil> view ( society4 ,philosophy1 too1 is ex]t+ all along a half-unconsci\s pressure t[>d ! ?\ght ( ! organic unity ( society4 ,t philosophy may exi/ at all1 x mu/ />t f ! assumption ( a univ]se1 a real unity ( tru?1 & its problem is to f9d a disc]n$ unity4 ,x kn[s no unrelat$ be+1 &1 consequ5tly1 :e!r x !oretically accepts ! =mulation or n1 x mu/ admit t1 z a matt] ( fact1 to be is to be 9 relations4 ,x ass]ts z a univ]sal fact1 :at natural sci5ce & psy*ology bo? affirm 9 _! own respective sph]es1 ! concrete relat$ness ( all4 ,x _c well d5y ! same ?\ght :5 appli$ to society4 ,its repeat$ attempts1 moreov]1 to conceive all z a develop+ unity1 & ! pr(\nd influ5ce ( ! analogy ( ! organism ^u its hi/ory1 bo? fur!r su/a9 ! organic view ( society4 ,*ri/ianity1 z well1 has be5 a p[]ful factor 9 ?is direction f ! beg9n+1 = x really fir/ gave ! ,idea ( ,humanity4#d #b4 ,! ,?reefold ,=m ( ! ,conviction4--,su/a9$1 n[1 by all ^! movem5ts 9 natural sci5ce1 psy*ology1 philosophy1 & ,*ri/ianity1 ?is ?\ght ( ! mutual influ5ce ( m5 has tak5 ?ree =ms3 t mutual influ5ce is inevitable1 isolation impossible2 t mutual influ5ce is desirable1 isolation to be %unn$2 t mutual influ5ce is indisp5sable1 isolation blight+4 7#a7 ,?is second elem5t 9 ! social consci\sness has meant1 !n1 9 ! fir/ place1 a gr[+ s5se ( ! inevitabl5ess ( ! mutual influ5ce ( all m51 & ( all classes ( m52 t we are all p>ts ( "o :ole1 ea* "p unavoidably affect$ by e o!r2 t we are b\nd up 9 "o bundle ( life ) all m51 & _c live an isolat$ life if we w\ld2 t we d influ5ce "o ano!r :e!r we w or n1 & t5d unconsci\sly to draw o!rs to our level & are ourselves drawn t[>d !irs2 t we joy & suff] toge!r :e!r we w or n1 & gr[ or det]iorate toge!r4 7#b7 ,b ! mutual influ5ce ( m5 means m ?an ?is3 n only t we d inevitably affect "o ano!r 9 liv+ out our own life1 b a gr[+ s5se ( ! fact t we are obvi\sly n int5d$ to come to our be/ 9 indep5d5ce ( "o ano!r2 t we are made on s l>ge a plan t we _c come to our be/ alone2 t we are evid5tly made = p]sonal relations1 & t1 !re=e1 l>g5ess ( life = ourselves dep5ds on our ent]+ into ! life ( o!rs4 7#c7 ,b ev5 m ?an ?is is true4 ,x is n only t ent]+ into ! life ( o!rs is a help 9 my life1 x is ! great help1 ! "o great means1 ! indisp5sable1 ! ess5tial condition ( all l>g5ess ( life2 x is ! v mean+ ( life1--life itself4 ,we are to f9d our life only 9 los+ our life4 ,life is ! fulfilm5t ( relations4 ,:5 we try to run away f ! v>iety & complexity ( ^! relations1 we are runn+ away f life itself4 ,! indisp5sabl5ess ( ^! relations to o!rs is assum$1 also1 9 ! ass]tion by ! sociologi/ ( an evolution t[>d a society1 at once m & m complex1 & m & m p]fect4 ,b if ,i gr[ 9 ! gr[? ( ano!r1 ! o!r gr[s 9 my gr[?4 ,if ! only ?+ ( value t ,i c f9ally give is myself1 ! value ( t gift dep5ds ^u ! l>g5ess & ri*ness ( ! self giv54 ,= love's own sake1 !re=e1 ,i mu/ gr[1 mu/ /rive to br+ to its highe/ p]fection t "w :i* is giv5 me to d4 ,a p]son is a social be+ call$ to contribute to ! :ole1 9 ! l9e ( 8 own be/ possibilities4 ,"o's l>ge/ m9i/ry to o!rs is to be r5d]$1 !n1 ?r\gh sacr$ reg>d = "o's own call+1 consid]$ z exactly 8 place ( l>ge/ s]vice4 ,or1 to put x ! o!r way3 ,i c come to my be/ only 9 "w s great & 9 associations s l>ge t ,i may lose myself 9 !m 9 p]fect objectivity4 ,! mutual influ5ce ( m51 !re=e1 is unavoidable1 is desirable1 is indisp5sable2 isolation impossible1 h9d]+1 blight+4 ,?is is ! true solid>ity ( ! race1 9 :i* !re is no fiction1 no hid+ 9 ! inconceivable1 & no pret5se4 ,,iii4 ,,! ,,s5se ,,( ,,! ,,value ,,& ,,sacr$ness ,,( ,,! ,,p]son ,! ?ird elem5t 9 ! social consci\sness1 ! s5se ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son1 foll[s naturally f ! s5se ( l-m9d$ness & ( mutual influ5ce1 b ne$s di/9ct & emphatic /atem5t4 ,x is less easily sep>able ?an ! o!r elem5ts nam$1 &1 inde$1 may be made to include all ! o!rs1 & does1 9 a way1 c>ry all ) x4 ,?us broadly conceiv$1 x has seem$ to ! writ] t--) ! return to ! hi/orical ,*ri/--x might well be call$ ! mo/ notable moral *>act]i/ic ( our "t4#e ,b1 ?\gh less easily & def9itely discrim9at$1 "o :o kn[s deeply ! mod]n social consci\sness w\ld surely feel t ! v he>t ( x _h be5 omitt$1 if ?is gr[+ s5se ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son did n come to /rong expression4 ,rev]5ce = p]sonality--! /eadily deep5+ s5se t e p]son has a value n to be measur$ 9 any?+ else1 & is 9 himself sacr$ to ,god & man--?is x is :i* m>ks unmi/akably e /ep 9 ! progress ( ! individual & ( ! race4 ,)\t x1 :atev] ! o!r m>ks ( civilization1 y h only tyranny & slav]y2 ) x1 ?\gh e trace ( luxury & sci5tific inv5tion be lack+1 y h ! p]fection ( human relations4 ,?is s5se ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son n only *>act]izes increas+ly ! :ole social & moral evolution ( ! race1 b x is to be se5 9 ! cle>ly consci\s dem& = equality ( rights1 &1 especially--to take a s+le example--9 ! gr[+ recognition t ! *ild is an individual ) 8 own rights2 t he has a p]sonality ( 8 own ( a sanctity inviolable by ! p>5t2 t !re are cle> b\nds beyond :i* no "o may g )\t p]sonal outrage4 ,! recognition by psy*ology ( respect = p]sonality z "o ( ! ?ree or f\r mo/ fundam5tal conditions--if n ! mo/ ess5tial ( all--( happ9ess1 ( "*1 & ( influ5ce1 is explicit confirmation ( ! tru? ( ?is elem5t ( ! social consci\sness4 ,,iv4 ,,! ,,s5se ,,( ,,obligation ,b ! elem5ts ( ! social consci\sness already nam$ lead directly to a gr[+ s5se ( obligation4 ,e man c>ries 9 himself 8 only possible /&>d ( measurem5t ( all else4 ,a gr[+ s5se ( ! lik5ess ( o!r m5 to himself quick5s at once1 !re=e1 ! s5se ( obligation1 & leads naturally to ! ,gold5 ,rule4 ,recognition ( mutual influ5ce1 too1 inevitably c>ries ) x a deep] s5se ( obligation2 =1 if we d affect o!rs con/antly1 !n we are manife/ly "u obligation n only to d direct s]vice to o!rs1 b s to ord] our own lives z to help1 n to h9d]1 o!rs4 ,! s5se ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son pla9ly looks to ! same deep5+ ( obligation4 ,z an elem5t ( ! social consci\sness1 ! s5se ( obligation means = a giv5 individual1 a gr[+ s5se ( responsibility = all2 & = society at l>ge an increase 9 ! numb] ( ^? :o feel ! obligation to s]ve4 ,! gr[? 9 ea* ( ^! directions _c be que/ion$4 ,!re is no privileg$ class1 9 ^: own consci5ces !re is n be+ recogniz$ m & m ! "r ( ! claim t !y mu/ ju/ify !mselves by s]vice :i* %all be z unique z _! privilege4 ,9 consequ5ce1 ! conception ( ! gov]n+ classes is /eadily *ang+1 = bo? ! gov]n$ & ! gov]n+1 to "s recognition ( ,*ri/'s pr9ciple1 t he :o w\ld be fir/ mu/ be s]vant ( all4 ,! %>p insi/5ce ( ! sociologi/ t organization mu/ be = ! organiz$ expresses ! same ?\ght4 ,"o mu/ add sociology's d\ble ass]tion1 t society is really advanc+ t[>d its goal1 & yet t a *ief condition ( ! progress ( society is unselfi% lead]%ip4#f ,?is c only mean t !re is1 increas+ly1 unselfi% lead]%ip1 m & m ( consci\s1 will+ cop]ation on ! "p ( m5 9 =w>d+ ! social evolution4 ,none ( u c return to ! old] attitude ( comp>ative indiff]5ce1 nor c we hone/ly def5d x4 ,we d h obligations & we own !m2 we are judg+ ourselves increas+ly by ,*ri/'s te/ ( m9i/]+ love4 ,v4 ,,! ,,s5se ,,( ,,love ,& ! social consci\sness ends necess>ily 9 love1 9 ! broad]1 e?ical mean+ ( t ^w4 ,we %all nev] feel t ! social consci\sness is complete1 %ort ( real love4 ,all ! o!r elem5ts ( ! social consci\sness lead to love & are includ$ 9 x4 ,ev5 ! sociologi/ mu/ br+ 9 z necess>y results ( ! consci\sness ( k9d--sympa?y1 affection1 & desire = ! recognition ( o!rs2#g & he f9ds ^! always m or less di/9ctly at "w among m54 ,^! fur!r consid]ations f ! /udy ( evolution confirm ?is result3 t man is prem95tly ! social animal2#h t ) man we h cle>ly rea*$ ! /age ( p]sons & ( p]sonal relations2#i t ! v exi/5ce & developm5t ( man requir$ love at e /ep2#aj & t ! *ief moral significance ( man's prolong$ infancy is probably to be f\nd 9 ! necess>y call+ out ( love4#aa ,s1 too1 x has become con/antly m & m cle> t our obligation1 :at we owe to o!rs1 is ourselves2 & ! giv+ ( ! self is love4 ,x seems to be ?ru/ home ^u social work]s ev]y:]e t !re is no solution ( any social problem )\t a p]sonal self-giv+ 9 "s way on ! "p ( "s2 t !re is no *eap] way ?an ?is v co/ly "o ( love1 ( ! giv+ ( ourselves--:e!r 9 ! family1 or 9 *>ity1 or 9 crim9ology4 ,! po9t1 already not$1 t ! progress ( society dep5ds on lead]s :o w s]ve ) unselfi% devotion1 is only ano!r emphasis ^u love z an indisp5sable elem5t ( ! social consci\sness4 ,& ! social goal--equality1 bro!rhood1 lib]ty1 :5 ^! t]ms are giv5 any adequate e?ical cont5t--is absolutely un?9kable 9 any really vital s5se )\t love4 ,any attempt$ def9ition ( love1 moreov]1 resolves at once into :at we mean by ! social consci\sness4 ,if we def9e love z ! giv+ ( self1 ?is is exactly :at1 ) gr[+ cle>ness & insi/5ce1 ! social consci\sness dem&s4 ,if ) ,h]rmann we call love1 joy 9 p]sonal life--joy1 t is1 9 ! revelation ( p]sonal life1 ?is c only come 9 t tru/ful1 rev]5t1 self-surr5d]+ association to :i* ! social consci\sness exhorts4 ,if ) ,edw>ds we call love1 will+ ! highe/ & complete/ good ( all1 we rea* ! same result4 ,or if ) ,*ri/ 9 ! ,beatitudes1 or ) ,paul 9 ! ?irte5? ( ,i ,cor9?ians1 we /udy ! *>act]i/ics ( love1 we %all h>dly d\bt t a complete social consci\sness mu/ h ^! m>ks ( love4 ,^! elem5ts1 !n1 make up ! social consci\sness3 ! s5se ( l-m9d$ness1 ( mutual influ5ce1 ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son1 ( obligation1 & ( love2 & all ^!1 ) _! impli$ dem&s1 only po9t to :at a p]son mu/ be if he is to be fully p]sonal4 ,) ?is def9ition 9 m9d1 we may n[ ask1 :e!r ! analogy ( ! organism c adequately express ! social consci\sness4 #a ,cf4 ,gidd+s1 ,elem5ts ( ,sociology1 pp4 #f1 #aj1 #fe1 #ff1 #gg4 #b ,cf4 ,gidd+s1 ,op4 cit41 p4 #cbd4 #c ,see ,! ,new ,_w1 ,sept41 #ahih1 p4 #eaf4 #d ,cf4 ,lotze1 ,! ,microcosmus1 ,vol4 ,,ii1 p4 #baa4 #e ,see ,k+1 ,recon/ruction 9 ,!ology1 ,*ap4 ,,ix1 pp1 #afi ff4 #f ,see ,gidd+s1 ,op4 cit41 pp4 #cjb1 #cbj-cbb4 #g ,cf4 ,gidd+s1 ,op4 cit41 pp4 #fe1 #ff4 #h ,cf4 ,gidd+s1 ,op4 cit41 p4 #bda4 #i ,see ,k+1 ,recon/ruction 9 ,!ology1 pp4 #ib-if4 #aj ,cf4 ,drummond1 ,! ,asc5t ( ,man1 pp4 #bgb ff4 #aa ,cf4 ,john ,fiske1 ,! ,de/9y ( ,man1 p4 #gd2 ,drummond1 ,op4 cit41 p4 #bgi ff4 ,,*apt] ,,ii ,,! ,,inadequacy ,,( ,,! ,,analogy ,,( ,,! ,,organism ,,z ,,an ,,expression ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness#ab ,i4 ,,! ,,value ,,( ,,! ,,analogy ,! analogy ( ! organism has play$ s l>ge a "p 9 ! hi/ory ( ?\ght1 especially 9 ! consid]ation ( e?ical & social que/ions1 t x is well wor? :ile to ask exactly h[ f> ?is analogy is adequate1 al?\gh ! dang] ( ! abuse ( ! analogy is probably some:at less ?an =m]ly4 ,x may be said at once t x is1 und\bt$ly1 ! v be/ illu/ration ( ^! social relations t we c draw f nature1 & x is ( real value4 ,x has _h1 moreov]1 z already indicat$1 a mo/ influ5tial & l>gely honorable hi/ory 9 ! developm5t ( ! ?\ght ( m54 ,its classical expression is 9 ! epo*-mak+ twelf? *apt] ( ,i ,cor9?ians1 :i* makes s pla9 ! e?ical applications ( ! analogy4 ,,ii4 ,,! ,,inevitable ,,inadequacy ,,( ,,! ,,analogy #a4 ,comes f ! ,sub-p]sonal ,_w4--,b x ought cle>ly to be se51 on ! o!r h&1 t1 consid]$ z a complete expression ( ! social consci\sness1 x is necess>ily inadequate2 & x is ( mom5t t we %\ld n be dom9at$ by x4 ,too (t5 x has be5 made to cov] ! entire gr\nd1 z ?\gh 9 itself x 7 a complete expression & f9al explanation ( ! social consci\sness1 in/ead ( a q incomplete illu/ration4 ,=1 9 ! fir/ place1 ! v fact t ! analogy comes f ! physical _w1 f ! sub-p]sonal realm1 makes x c]ta9 t x mu/ fail at vital po9ts 9 ! expression ( :at is peculi>ly a p]sonal & e?ical fact4 ,we _c safely argue directly f ! physical illu/ration to e?ical propositions4 #b4 ,access to ,reality1 ,only ,?r\gh ,ourselves4--,moreov]1 9 ?is day ( extraord9>y att5tion to ! physical _w1 x is p>ticul>ly important t we %\ld keep con/antly 9 m9d t we h direct access to reality only 9 ourselves2 t man is himself necess>ily ! only key :i* we c use = any ultimate und]/&+ ( any?+2 or1 z ,pauls5 puts x1 ,i "k reality z x is 9 itself1 9 s f> z ,i am real myself1 or 9 s f> z x is1 or is l1 t :i* ,i am1 namely1 _s4#ac ,we are n to =get t1 9 v tru?1 we "k bett] :at we mean by p]sons & p]sonal relations1 ?an we d :at we mean by memb]s ( a body & by organic relations2 &1 fur!r1 t 9 po9t ( fact1 all ^? metaphysical notions by :i* we /rive to ?9k ?+s are ultimately d]iv$ f ourselves2 & t !n we illogically turn back ^u our own m9ds1 f :i* all ^! notions came1 to expla9 ! m9d 9 ! same second>y way 9 :i* we expla9 o!r ?+s4 #c4 ,mi/ak5 ,passion = ,con/ru+ ,ev]y?+4--,natural sci5ce1 ) its sole problem ( ! trac+ ( imm$iate causal connections1 naturally provokes a p]si/5t1 b nev]!less ?or\ghly mi/ak51 passion1 z ,lotze calls x1#ad = con/ru+ ev]y?+1--ev5 ! mo/ real & f9al reality1 _s2 :i* wi%es to see ev5 ?is real & f9al reality expla9$ z ! me*anical result ( ! comb9ation ( simpl] elem5ts1 !mselves1 x is to be not$1 f9ally absolutely inexplicable4 ,su* p]v]se attempts w be widely hail$1 by _m :o d n und]/& !mselves1 z highly sci5tific4 ,& "o :o refuses to ent] ^u su* inve/igations w be criticiz$ by su* m9ds z h>dly gett+ into grips ) 8 subject4 ,b x is a false application ( ! sci5tific in/9ct t leads "o to seek me*anical explanation = ! f9al reality1 or t urges to precision ( =mulation beyond t w>rant$ by ! data4 ,x is f exactly ?is falsely sci5tific bias t !ology ne$s deliv]ance4 ,=1 z ,ari/otle rem9ds u1 x is ! m>k ( a man ( culture to try to atta9 exactness 9 ea* k9d ( k j s f> z ! nature ( ! subject all[s4 ,!re is a wise agno/icism t is violat$ alike by negative & by positive dogmatism4 ,x is (t5 ov]look$ t !re is an ov]-wise radicalism t assumes a k ( ! dep? ( ! f9ite & inf9ite1 q z insi/5t & dogmatic z ! view x supposes itself to be oppos+4 ,i "k x is n s1 x ought n to ne$ to be said1 is n agno/icism4 ,! guid+ pr9ciple 9 a truly sci5tific !ology is ?is1 z ,lotze sugge/s3 ,j s f> z *ang+ action dep5ds ^u alt]+ conditions1 we h explanatory & con/ructive problems to solve1 & no f>!r4 ,no philosophical view c d )\t a simply giv5 reality4 ,& we %all nev] succe$ 9 und]/&+ by :at ma*9]y reality is manufactur$--9 d$uc+ ! :ole positive cont5t ( reality f m]e modifications ( =mal conditions4#ae ,we %all n all[ ourselves to be misl$1 !re=e1 by ! sci5tific s\nd ( ! detail$ application ( ! analogy ( ! organism to ! facts ( ! social consci\sness4 ,& x is a satisfaction to see t ! cle>e/ sociological writ]s are com+ to agree t !re is /rictly no social m9d t c be affirm$ to exi/ z a sep>ate reality1 suppos$ to answ] to society conceiv$ 9 its totality z an organism4 ,,iii4 ,,! ,,analogy ,,te/$ ,,by ,,! ,,def9ition ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,:51 n[1 we te/ ! analogy ( ! organism by its compet5cy to express ! full mean+ ( ! social consci\sness1 z x has be5 def9$1 we mu/ say t ! analogy b feebly expresses ! lik5ess ( m52 x be/ expresses ! inevitabl5ess ( mutual influ5ce1 ?\gh ev5 "h !re is no und]/&able ultimate explanation2 x fairly expresses ! desirabl5ess & indisp5sabl5ess ( mutual influ5ce1 b1 ( c\rse1 ) entire lack ( e?ical mean+2 & x q fails to express ! s5se ( ! value & ! sacr$ness ( ! p]son1 ! s5se ( obligation1 & ! s5se ( love4 ,we ne$ to see & feel exactly ^! %ortcom+s1 if we are n to abuse ! analogy4 ,!re is no social consci\sness t w hold wat] t does n re/ on :at ,phillips ,brooks call$ a heal?y & in]adicable individualism1 9 ! s5se ( ! recognition ( ! fully p]sonal4 ,we are spirits1 n organisms1 & society is a society ( p]sons1 n an organism1 9 a /rict s5se4 ,:y %\ld we wi% to make society less significant ?an x is8 #ab ,cf4 ,k+1 ,op4 cit41 pp4 #ib ff41 #agi4 #ac ,introduction to ,philosophy1 p4 #cgc4 #ad ,! ,microcosmus1 ,vol4 ,i1 p4 #bfb4 #ae ,lotze1 ,! ,microcosmus1 ,vol4 ,,ii1 pp4 #fdi ff4 ,,*apt] ,,iii ,,! ,,necessity ,,( ,,! ,,facts1 ,,( ,,:i* ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,is ,,! ,,reflection1 ,,if ,,ideal ,,int]e/s ,,are ,,to ,,be ,,supreme ,i4 ,,! ,,"q ,) ?is positive & negative def9ition ( ! social consci\sness 9 our m9ds1 a ?ird "q imm$iately sugge/s itself to "o :o wi%es to g to ! bottom ( our !me4 ,:y mu/ ! facts1 ( :i* ! social consci\sness is ! reflection1 be z !y are if ideal int]e/s are to be supreme8 ,:at has a !odicy to say z to ^! facts8 ,:y1 t is1 f ! po9t ( view ( ! ideal--( religion & !ology--:y are we con/itut$ s alike8 s t we mu/ influ5ce "o ano!r8 s t ! results ( our actions necess>ily g ov] into ! lives ( o!rs8 s t ! innoc5t suff] ) ! guilty & ! guilty pr(it ) ! righte\s8 s t we mu/ recognize ev]y:]e ! claim ( o!rs8 s t we mu/ respect _! p]sonality8 & s t we mu/ love !m8 ,,ii4 ,,o!rwise ,,no ,,moral ,,_w ,,at ,,all ,! answ] to all ^! _w-old que/ions may p]haps be conta9$ 9 ! s+le /atem5t1 t o!rwise we %\ld h no moral _w at all4 ,!re w\ld be no ?9kable moral univ]se1 b r z _m worlds z !re are individuals1 hav+ no m to d ) "o ano!r ?an ! *emical reactions go+ on 9 a set ( te/-tubes4 #a4 ,! ,pr]equisites ( a ,moral ,_w4 ,= our human ?9k+1 assur$ly1 !re are c]ta9 pr]equisites1 t ! _w may be at all a sph]e = moral tra9+ & action4 ,:at are ^! pr]equisites = a moral _w8 ,!re mu/ be1 9 ! fir/ place1 a sph]e ( univ]sal law1 to c\nt on1 )9 :i* all actions take place4 ,9 a lawless _w1 action c\ld h>dly take on any significance--lea/ ( all e?ical significance4 ,t fre$om itself %\ld mean any?+ 9 outw>d expression1 !re mu/ be ! possibility ( intellig5t use ( means t[>d ! ends *os54 ,!re mu/ be1 9 ! second place1 "s real e?ical fre$om1 "s p[] ( moral initiative4 ,we ne$ n qu>rel ab\t ! t]ms us$2 b1 z ,pauls5 intimates1 no s]i\s e?ical writ] ev] d\bt$ t m5 h at lea/ "s p[] to %ape _! own *>act]s4#af ,)\t t assumption1 we h a :ole _w ( ideas & ideals--_m ( !m ! reale/ facts 9 ! _w to u--t h no legitimate excuse = be+1 t are simple insanities ( ! mo/ inexplicable sort4 ,! v mean+ ( ! p]sonality1 inde$1 :i* ! social consci\sness mu/ dem& = m51 is "s real exi/5ce = self1 t is1 "s real self-consci\sness & moral initiative4 ,& fre$om is n en\gh2 !re mu/ be also "s p[] ( accompli%m5t4 ,to ascribe m]e volition to man seems1 x has be5 ju/ly said1 sophi/ical4 ,results are ne$$ to reveal ! "* ( our acts1 ev5 to ourselves--to make t "* real4 ,lotze's *>ge t ! _w is imp]fect because x might h be5 s made t only good designs c\ld be c>ri$ out1 or s t ! results ( evil volitions w\ld be at once correct$1#ag is itself simil>ly sophi/ical4 ,su* a _w1 9 :i* ! outw>d results ( action nev] appe>1 w\ld be b a play-_w aft] all--only a nurs]y ( babes n yet capable ( "*4 ,x c\ld be no fit _w = moral tra9+4 ,& /ill m1 n less1 mu/ ?is law ( ! necess>y results ( actions hold 9 our relations to o!r p]sons4 ,!re c be1 lea/ ( all1 a moral univ]se :]e we are n memb]s "o ( ano!r4 ,"*1 9 any =m we c conceive x1 c\ld n !n exi/4 ,our be/1 z well z our wor/1 possibilities are involv$ 9 ^! necess>y mutual relations4 ,moral "* has mean+ only 9 p]sonal relations4 ,! results1 !re=e1 :i* foll[ ^u action1 if ! "* ( our de$ is to h reality = u1 mu/ be *iefly p]sonal4 ,! realm ( "* has fe>ful possibilities4 ,?is is no play-_w4 ,we c cause & be caus$ suff]+1 & our s9 necess>ily c>ries ! suff]+1 if n ! s91 ( o!rs ) x4 #b4 ,! ,ideal ,_w ,requires1 ?us1 ! ,facts ( ! ,social ,consci\sness4--,all ?is c\ld be *ang$ 9 any vital way only by %utt+ up e s\l absolutely to itself1 & ) t result life has simply ceas$4 ,= we _c really conceive a p]son z hav+ any reason = be+ )\t su* relations4 ,he w\ld be con/antly baffl$ at e po9t1 = he is made = p]sons & p]sonal relations4 ,love1 too1 ! highe/ s\rce ( bo? "* & happ9ess1 requires ev]y:]e p]sonal relations4 ,religion itself1 z a %>+ ( ! life ( ,god1 w\ld be impossible )\t "s relation to o!rs2 = ,god1 at lea/1 c\ld n be sep>at$ f ! life ( all4 ,t is1 p]sons1 love1 religion1 9 su* a _w1 h gone4 ,?is1 !n1 simply means t ! ideal _w ceases to be1 ) ! d5ial ( ! facts t ! social consci\sness reflects4 ,we mu/ be full p]sons1 social be+s 9 ! entire mean+ dem&$ by ! social consci\sness--h>d z ! consequ5ces involv$ (t5 are--if ideal int]e/s are to be supreme4 ,inde$1 ! v moral judgm5t1 t incessantly prompts ! problem ( evil = e "o ( u1 is requir$1 = its own exi/5ce1 to assume ! validity ( ! relations ab\t :i* x que/ions4 ,= x compla9s1 = ! mo/ "p1 ( ^? facts t foll[ inevitably f ! necess>y mutual influ5ce ( m52 b ! *ief s\rces ( ! joy x requires1 t x may ju/ify ! _w1 lie 9 ^! same mutual relations4 ,x assumes1 ?us1 9 its claims on ! _w1 ! validity & wor? ( ! v relations ( :i* x compla9s 9 its criticism ( ! _w4 ,or1 slightly to v>y ! /atem5t1 ! major premise1 ev5 ( pessimism1 is t a really ju/ifiable _w mu/ h wor? 9 ! joy x yields 9 p]sonal life1 impossible out ( ! p]sonal relations ( a real moral univ]se4 ,& !re c be no moral univ]se )\t ! facts reflect$ 9 ! social consci\sness4 ,! ideal _w requires1 !n1 ! facts ( ! social consci\sness4 #af ,sy/em ( ,e?ics1 pp4 #dfg ff4 #ag ,philosophy ( ,religion1 p4 #abe4 ,,*apt] ,,iv ,,! ,,ultimate ,,explanation ,,& ,,gr\nd ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,! mo/ important & fundam5tal inquiry z to ! possible help ( !ology to ! social consci\sness /ill rema9s3 ,:at is ! ultimate explanation & gr\nd ( ! social consci\sness8 ,?is "q includes two3 7#a7 ,h[ c x be metaphysically t we d influ5ce "o ano!r8 7#b7 ,:at is requir$ = ! f9al positive ju/ification ( ! social consci\sness z e?ical8 ,!ology's answ] to bo? que/ions is f\nd 9 ! be+ & "* ( ,god1 ! creative & moral s\rce ( all4 ,i4 ,,h[ ,,c ,,x ,,be1 ,,metaphysically1 ,,t ,,we ,,d ,,influ5ce ,,"o ,,ano!r8 ,fir/1 !n1 h[ c x be t we d influ5ce "o ano!r8 ,:at is ! f9al explanation ( ! con/ant fact ( our reciprocal action8 ,= 9 our f9al ?9k+ we may n ignore ?is "q4 #a4 ,n ,due to ! ,physical ,fact ( ,race-,connection4--,x may be wor? :ile say+1 fir/1 t ! physical fact ( race-connection1 if t c\ld be prov$1 w\ld be no suffici5t explanation4 ,! race may1 or may n1 be dep5d5t ^u a s+le pair1 b 9 any case ?is is n ! ess5tial connection4 ,! race is "o by virtue ( its ess5tial lik5ess1 h[ev] t comes ab\t4 ,m5 might h sprung out ( ! gr\nd 9 absolute individual indep5d5ce ( "o ano!r1 & yet if !re 7 su* actual l-m9d$ness z n[ exi/s1 ! race w\ld be z truly "o z x n[ is1 & z capable ( reciprocal action1 & its memb]s "u ! same obligation to "o ano!r4 ,no ideal int]e/ is at /ake1 !n1 9 ! "q ( ! actual physical unity ( ! race z desc5d$ f "o pair4 ,"o may say1 ( c\rse1 t ! physical unity ( ! race w\ld naturally result1 accord+ to ! laws app>5tly prevail+ 9 ! animal _w1 9 lik5ess4 ,& ?is may1 !re=e1 seem to him ! mo/ natural proximate explanation4 ,b1 ev5 s1 x is well to "k t our entire moral int]e/ is 9 ! ess5tial lik5ess & mutual influ5ce ( m51 h[ev] br\ght ab\t1 & n 9 ! physical unity ( m54 ,!ology has no occasion to cont9ue its e>li] excessive & q fundam5tal emphasis ^u ?is physical unity4 ,moreov]1 su* an explanation is necess>ily b proximate4 ,back ( x lies ! deep] "q1 ,:y j ^! laws1 & modes ( proc$ure8 #b4 ,we are n to ,ov]-,emphasize ! ,pr9ciple ( ,h]$ity4--,nor c !ology1 f any po9t ( view1 af=d to ov]-emphasize ! pr9ciple ( h]$ity if x wi%es to keep human initiative at all4 ,x is a dang]\s alliance :i* ! old-s*ool !ology ) its racial s9 9 ,adam has be5 s ready to make ) ! pr9ciple ( h]$ity4 ,t pr9ciple1 z !y wi% to use x1 proves q too mu*2 & c>eful ?9k]s1 really awake to ideal int]e/s1 may well rejoice 9 ! comp>ative relief :i* sci5ce itself1 ?r\gh ! probably some:at exagg]at$ prote/ ( ! ,weismann or ,neo-,d>w9ian s*ool1 seems likely to af=d f ! incubus ( a grossly exagg]at$ h]$ity4 ,! ma9 int]e/ = ! ideal view lies "r "h4 ,we c see :y ?is law ( ! inh]itance ( acquir$ *>act]i/ics1 9 ,pr(essor ,james' language1 %\ld n be v]ifi$ 9 ! human race1 & :y1 !re=e1 9 look+ = evid5ce on ! subject1 we %\ld conf9e ourselves exclusively to l[] animals4 ,9 !m fix$ habit is ! ess5tial & *>act]i/ic law ( n]v\s action4 ,! bra9 gr[s to ! exact modes 9 :i* x has be5 ex]cis$1 & ! inh]itance ( ^! modes--!n call$ in/9cts--w\ld h 9 x no?+ surpris+4 ,b 9 man ! negation ( all fix$ modes is ! ess5tial *>act]i/ic4 ,he owes 8 :ole prem95ce z a reason]1 8 :ole human quality ( intellect1 we may say1 to ! facility ) :i* a giv5 mode ( ?\ght 9 him may sudd5ly be brok5 up into elem5ts1 :i* re-comb9e anew4 ,only at ! price ( inh]it+ no settl$ in/9ctive t5d5cies is he able to settle e novel case by ! fre% discov]y by 8 reason ( novel pr9ciples4 ,he is1 p> excell5ce1 ! educable animal4#ah ,to ov]-emphasize ! pr9ciple ( h]$ity1 !n1 is to /rike at "o ( ! mo/ fundam5tal di/9ctive human qualities1 & s to endang] e ideal int]e/4 ,! gr[+ l-m9d$ness ( m5 & _! mutual influ5ce are n =?) to be ascrib$ to an omnipot5t pr9ciple ( h]$ity4 #c4 ,n ,due to a ,my/ical ,solid>ity4--,nor is ! mutual influ5ce ( m5 to be expla9$ by any my/ical solid>ity ( ! race consid]$ z a f9ite :ole4 ,x is a simple & reasonable sci5tific dem&1 t we %\ld n assume a my/]i\s1 indef9able & incalculable cause1 :]e kn[n & intelligible causes suffice to expla9 ! ph5om5a 9 "q4 ,d we ne$1 or c we intellig5tly use1 a my/ical solid>ity8 ,! only solid>ity ( ! race :i* we seem really to ne$1 or ) :i* we seem able intellig5tly to deal1 is ! actual l-m9d$ness & ! actual p]sonal relations !mselves--! reciprocal action ( spirits--! only k9d ( reciprocal action :i* we c f9ally fully conceive4 ,any o!r f9ite solid>ity ?an ?is1 ?\gh x has (t5 figur$ 9 !ology1 seems to me only a "n )\t significance4 ,9 any case1 we ne$ to insi/ 9 !ology1 mu* m ?an we h1 ^u t unity ( ! race :i* is due to ! actual lik5ess ( m5 & _! actual mutual p]sonal influ5ce4 ,su* a unity we "k & c und]/&1 & x is ( ! highe/ e?ical & spiritual importance4 ,b to make mu* ( ! physical unity is to gr\nd ! spiritual 9 ! physical2 &1 on ! o!r h&1 to take refuge 9 a my/ical solid>ity--& ?is is (t5 felt to be a r deep proc$ure--= :atev] !ological purpose1 is to hide 9 ! fog ( ! obscure & un9telligible4 #d4 ,gr\nd$ 9 ! ,imman5ce ( ,god4--,b back ( all f9ite ph5om5a1 we may /ill ask = an ultimate explanation ( ! possibility ( any reciprocal action ev5 betwe5 spirits4 ,& x is1 p]haps1 ?is ultimate explanation aft] :i* ! idea ( a my/ical solid>ity ( ! race is bl9dly grop+4 ,unless "o *ooses to accept reciprocal action z a necess>ily giv5 fact 9 any univ]se 7& ?is position1 ,i ?9k ) ,f4 ,c4 ,s4 ,s*ill]1 may be reasonably def5d$71#ai he mu/ some:]e 9 8 ?9k+ ask = its f9al explanation4 ,& mo/ ( ^?1 :o try to ?9k ?+s ?r\gh1 feel ?is pressure4 ,& metaphysics1 we d well to rememb] ) ,pr(essor ,james1 means only an unusually ob/9ate attempt to ?9k cle>ly & consi/5tly4#bj ,z ,lotze puts x3 ,h[ a cause beg9s to produce its imm$iate effect1 h[ a condition is ! f\ndation ( its direct result1 x w nev] be possible to say2 yet t cause & effect d ?us act mu/ be reckon$ among ^? simple facts t compose ! reality :i* is ! object ( all our inve/igation4 ,b !re is an intol]able contradiction 9 ! assumption t1 ?\gh two be+s may be :olly indep5d5t ! "o ( ! o!r1 yet t :i* takes place 9 "o c be a cause ( *ange 9 ! o!r2 ?+s t d n affect ea* o!r at all1 _c at ! same "t affect ea* o!r 9 su* a mann] t ! "o is guid$ by ! o!r4#ba ,?is "q is fairly ?ru/ ^u u by ! facts ( ! social consci\sness4 ,h[ c x be t we d s influ5ce "o ano!r8 h[ is our reciprocal action metaphysically possible8 ,! answ] ( !i/ic philosophy to ?is "q is f\nd 9 ! be+ ( ,god4 ,^u ! metaphysical side1 !i/ic philosophy affirms t we c ascribe indep5d5t exi/5ce 9 ! highe/ s5se only to ,god4 ,all else is absolutely dep5d5t = its exi/5ce & ma9t5ance ^u him4 ,! k9d ( reality t we dem& = man is n t he be outside ( ,god1 indep5d5t ( him2 ?is w\ld n make man m1 b less4 ,e ?or\gh-go+ !i/ic view mu/ h ?is at lea/ 9 common ) pan!ism1 t x recognizes ev]y:]e a real imman5ce ( ,god4 ,we are1 because ,god wills 9 u4 ,?is metaphysical relation ( ! f9ite to ! inf9ite1 to be sure1 is n to be conceiv$ spatially or mat]ially2 nor1 lea/ ( all1 is x be s conceiv$ z to d5y a real self-consci\sness & a real moral initiative to ! f9ite _s2 b x does involve ! absolute dep5d5ce ( all ! f9ite ^u ! w ( ,god4 ,z to our be+1 we root solely 9 ,god4 ,& ! unity & consi/5cy ( ! be+ ( ,god are ! actual gr\nd ( our possible reciprocal action4 ,only s is t contradiction ( :i* ,lotze spoke avoid$4 ,we are n indep5d5t ( "o ano!r1 because we are all alike dep5d5t = our v be+ ^u ,god4 ,& we are ?us memb]s "o ( ano!r1 ultimately1 only ?r\gh him4 ,! fur!r fact1 t we are nev] fully able to trace causal connections any:]e2 t ev5 9 ! cle>e/ case no possible analysis ( "o /age 9 ! process enables u to prophesy1 indep5d5tly ( exp]i5ce1 ! next /age1 also compels u to admit t ! full cause is n really pres5t 9 any ( ! f9ite manife/ations we c foll[2 t we h always to take acc\nt ( ! hidd5 efficacy ( ! ,inf9ite ev]y:]e at "w1 & s mu/ recognize once aga9 ! indubitable imman5ce ( ,god1 ! absolute dep5d5ce ( ! f9ite ^u 8 w1 & our reciprocal action z possible only ?r\gh him4#bb ,or1 to put ! same ?+ a little diff]5tly1 any adequate !ory ( causality seems to lead u up inevitably to purpose 9 ,god4 ,z ,pr(essor ,b[ne /ates x3#bc ,! fundam5tal anti!sis ( purpose & causation is incorrect4 ,! true anti!sis is t ( me*anical & volitional causality4 ,& he intimates ! probability t all causality1 ev5 9 ! physical _w1 is ultimately volitional4 ,x becomes a "q1 he says1 :e!r true causality c be f\nd 9 ! ph5om5al at all1 & n r 9 a p[] beyond ! ph5om5al :i* incessantly posits & cont9ues t ord] accord+ to rule4 ,! unity & consi/5cy ( ! imman5t w ( ,god1 !n1 are ! ultimate metaphysical gr\nd ( all reciprocal action4 ,! mutual influ5ce1 t is1 ev5 ( spirits1 f9ds its f9al full explanation only 9 ,god4 ,! social consci\sness1 !re=e1 s f> z x is an expression ( ! possibility & inevitabl5ess ( our mutual influ5ce1 is a reflection ( ! imman5ce ( ! "o ,god 9 ! unity & consi/5cy ( 8 life4 ,b ?is1 aft] all1 is n ! mo/ important elem5t ( ! social consci\sness4 ,s f> z x is e?ical at all1 x c h no f9al explanation 9 ! metaphysical1 consid]$ z m]e matt] ( fact4 ,we are driv51 !re=e1 to ask ! second "q involv$ 9 ! subject ( ! *apt]4 ,,ii4 ,,:at ,,is ,,requir$ ,,= ,,! ,,f9al ,,positive ,,ju/ification ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,z ,,e?ical8 #a4 ,mu/ be ,gr\nd$ 9 ! ,support+ ,w ( ,god4--,x is n en\gh t we %\ld be able to ?9k ( ! unity ( ,"o ,life p]vad+ all1 or ev5 ( ,"o ,w uphold+ all4 ,if ! social consci\sness1 z di/9ctly e?ical1 is to h any f9al ju/ification1 x mu/ be able to believe t x is 9 league ) ! et]nal & univ]sal =ces2 t ! fundam5tal tr5d ( ! univ]se is its own tr5d2 9 o!r words1 t ! deepe/ ?+ 9 ! univ]se is an e?ical purpose conceivable only 9 a ,p]son2 t ! ideals & purposes ( f9ite be+s express$ 9 ! social consci\sness are 9 l9e ) ,god's own2 t ! lov+ holy purpose ( ! ,inf9ite ,w quick5s & su/a9s & surr\nds our purposes4 ,let u di/9ctly face ! fact t1 unless ! social consci\sness c be s gr\nd$ 9 ! v f\ndation ( ! univ]se1 x mu/ rema9 an illogical & unju/ifiable fragm5t 9 ! _w1 )\t real excuse = be+4 ,t is1 if ! social consci\sness is n to be an illusion1 x mu/ be1 z ,pr(essor ,na% cont5ds1 cosmical1 & n m]ely individual1 & e?ics mu/ root 9 religion4 ,?is is ! v he>t ( 8 /imulat+ book1 ,e?ics & ,revelation1 express$1 = example1 9 su* s5t5ces z ^!3 ,no?+ save a s5se ( deep & intimate connection ) ! solid core ( ?+s1 no?+ save a settl$ & f]vid conviction t ! univ]se is on ! side ( ! w 9 its /ruggle = t :ole-he>t$ devotion = ! welf>e ( ! race1 )\t :i* morality is an affair ( %r$s & pat*es1 c give to ! w ! =ce & edge suitable to ! difficult "w x has to d4 ,b ?is s5se ( k9%ip ) :at is deepe/ & mo/ abid+ 9 ! univ]se--:at else is meant by pure religion4 ,& aga93 ,we1 z f\nd]s & build]s ( ! true society1 f9d ourselves %ut up to an impassion$ fai? 9 ! s9c]ity ( ! univ]se & ! integrity ( ! fundam5tal be+4 ,our religion is a deep & wide syn!sis ( feel+1 :]eby t p]sonal w 9 u1 :i* gr\nds society1 comes into solemn league & cov5ant ) ! fundam5tal be+4 ,"h is ! focus-po9t ( ! prophetic revelation4 ,at ?is po9t1 ! deep 9 ,god answ]s to ! deep 9 ,man4444 ,all t ,he is ,he puts 9 pl$ge = ! p]fect+ ( ! society ,he has f\nd$4#bd ,pauls5 expresses only ! same fundam5tal conviction1 f ! po9t ( view ( ! philosoph]1 &1 at ! same "t1 ! he>t ( 8 own solution ( ! relation betwe5 k & fai?1 :5 he says3 ,!re is "o item1 at lea/1 9 :i* e man goes beyond m]e k1 beyond ! regi/ration ( facts4 ,t is 8 own life & 8 future4 ,8 life has a mean+ = him1 & he directs x t[>d some?+ :i* does n yet exi/1 b :i* w exi/ by virtue ( 8 w4 ,?us a fai? spr+s up by ! side ( 8 k4 ,he believes 9 ! realization ( ?is1 8 life's aim1 if he is at all 9 e>ne/ ab\t x4 ,s9ce1 h[ev]1 8 aim is n an isolat$ "o1 b is includ$ 9 ! hi/orical life ( a p1 & f9ally 9 t ( humanity1 he believes also 9 ! future ( 8 p1 9 ! victori\s future ( tru? & righte\sness & goodness 9 humanity4 ,:oev] devotes 8 life to a cause believes 9 t cause1 & ?is belief1 be 8 cre$ :at x may1 has always some?+ ( ! =m ( a religion4 ,h5ce fai? inf]s t an inn] connection exi/s betwe5 ! real & ! valuable )9 ! doma9 ( hi/ory1 & believes t 9 hi/ory some?+ l an imman5t pr9ciple ( reason or ju/ice favors ! "r & ! good1 & leads x to victory ov] all resi/+ =ces4 ,& ,pauls5 holds t ?is implicit fai? *>act]izes necess>ily e philosophical !ory4 ,:at ! philosoph] himself accepts z ! highe/ good & f9al goal he projects into ! _w z its good & goal1 & !n believes t subsequ5t reflections also reveal x to him 9 ! _w4#be ,we mu/ be able1 !n1 to believe t ! be/ we "k--our highe/ ideals--are at home 9 ! _w1 or give up all fai? 9 ! hone/y ( ! _w1 & all hope ( philosophy1 to say no?+ ( religion4 ,ultimately1 n[1 ?is means t no?+ %ort ( full ,*ri/ian conviction is ne$$ to support ! social consci\sness4 ,we ne$ to be able to believe t ! _s ( ! life & dea? ( ,*ri/ is at ! v he>t ( ! _w4 ,no?+ less w suffice4 ,& ?is is exactly ! support :i* ! ,*ri/ian revelation (f]s to ! social consci\sness4 #b4 ,god's ,%>+ 9 ,our ,life4--,b if ! social consci\sness is only a true reflection ( ,god's own desire & purpose1 !n 9 a s5se f> deep] ?an ! m]ely metaphysical1 our life is ! v life ( ,god4 ,he %>es 9 x4 ,& no man c really see :at t means1 & n f9d a new light fall+ on all ! _w1 & himself c>ri$ on to take up a new confession ( fai? 9 ! solemn words ( ano!r3 ,= ! agony ( ! _w's /ruggle is ! v life ( ,god4 ,7 he m]e spectator1 p]haps1 he too w\ld call life cruel4 ,b 9 ! unity ( our lives ) 81 our joy is 8 joy1 our pa9 is 84 ,& f ! vision ( ?is self-giv+ life ( ,god we turn back to our own place ( s]vice1 say+ ) ,ma!son3 ,if ,?\ art love !n ,?y be/ gift mu/ be sacrifice2 9 t light let me se>* ,?y _w4#bf ,we probably _c bett] express ?is unity ( our highe/ e?ical life ) ! life ( ,god ?an by r5ew+ our old fai? t we are *ildr5 ( a common ,fa!r1 :o h come1 "u ,god's own lead+--s f> z a social consci\sness is ours--volunt>ily to %>e 9 ,god's lov+ purpose 9 ! creation & r$emption ( m54 ,we d n "w alone2 nay1 we are co-work]s ) ,god4 #c4 ,! ,consequ5t ,transfiguration ( ! ,social ,consci\sness4--,& z soon z we h ?us really & deeply come into ! mean+ ( ,*ri/'s ?\ght ( ,god z ,fa!r1 & into 8 revelation 9 8 life & dea? z to :at ! _s ( t ,fa!rhood is1 we turn back to ! elem5ts ( our social consci\sness to f9d !m all transfigur$4 ,our lik5ess is ! lik5ess ( common *ildr5 ( ,god reflect+ ! image ( ! "o ,fa!r1 capable ( "* & ( indef9ite progress into ! highe/4 ,our mutual influ5ce roots 9 a real ,fa!rhood1 bo? 9 s\rce ( be+ & 9 ! "o purpose ( love1 alike creat+ & r$emptively work+ = all4 ,our s5se ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son n[ = ! fir/ "t gets its full ju/ification4 ,m5 are n only creatures capable ( joy+ & suff]+1 b *ildr5 ( ,god ) a preci\sness to be int]pret$ only 9 ! light ( ,*ri/1 & ) ! p[] ( ! endless life ^u !m4 ,conc]n+ ! value ( ! p]son1 x is wor? /opp+ j "h1 to notice t x is peculi>ly true ( ! social consci\sness1 t x is n free to ignore su* consid]ations ^u immortality z ^? :i* weigh$ mo/ ) ,john ,/u>t ,mill & ,sully4 ,( ! hope ( immortality1 ,mill says3 ,! b5eficial influ5ce ( su* a hope is f> f trifl+4 ,x makes life & human nature a f> great] ?+ to ! feel+s1 & gives great] /r5g? z well z great] solemnity to all ! s5tim5ts :i* are awak5$ 9 u by our fell[-creatures1 & by mank9d at l>ge4 ,& ,sully adds3 ,i w\ld only say t if m5 are to ab&on all hope ( a future life1 ! loss1 9 po9t ( *e]+ & su/a9+ influ5ce1 w be a va/ "o1 & "o n to be made good1 s f> z ,i c see1 by any new idea ( s]vices to collective humanity4#bg ,our s5se ( obligation deep5s ) all ?is deep5+ ( ! value ( m51 & our consci5ce becomes only a true response to ,god's own life & "*--9 no m]e figurative s5se ! voice ( ,god 9 u4 ,& our love becomes simply ent]+ a little way into ,god's own love1 a %>+ m & m 9 8 life4 ,& :5 "o has once se5 ! social consci\sness s transfigur$ 9 ! light ( ,*ri/'s revelation1 he mu/ believe t !n1 = ! fir/ "t1 he has se5 ! social consci\sness at its highe/1 & t x is impossible = him to g back to ! l[] ideal4 ,if ! social consci\sness is n an illusion1 ,*ri/'s ?\ght ( ,god & ( ! life ) ,god ought to be true2 & if ! _w is an hone/ _w1 x is true4 ,x is n only true t ,*ri/ has a social tea*+1 b t ! social consci\sness absolutely requires ,*ri/'s tea*+ = its own f9al ju/ification4 ,! ,*ri/ian tru? is s great t x alone c give ! social consci\sness its fulle/ mean+1 alone c enable x to und]/& itself1 & alone c give x adequate motive & p[]2 =1 9 ,keim's words1 to-day1 to-morr[1 & =ev] we c "k no?+ bett] ?an t ,god is our ,fa!r1 & t ! ,fa!r is ! re/ ( our s\ls4#bh #ah ,james1 ,psy*ology1 ,vol4 ,,ii1 pp4 #cfg1 #cfh4 #ai ,! ,philosophical ,review1 ,may1 #ahif1 p4 #bbh4 #bj ,psy*ology1 ,brief] ,c\rse1 p4 #dfa4 #ba ,microcosmus1 ,vol4 ,,ii1 p4 #eii4 #bb ,see ,k+1 ,recon/ruction 9 ,!ology1 pp4 #ed1 #hd1 #ajb4 #bc ,!ory ( ,?\ght & ,k1 pp4 #ia1 #aaa4 #bd ,e?ics & ,revelation1 pp4 #ej1 #bdc1 #bdd4 #be ,introduction to ,philosophy1 pp4 #h1 #i1 #cac4 #bf ,se>*+s 9 ! ,sil5ce1 p4 #df4 #bg ,quot$ by ,orr1 ,! ,*ri/ian ,view ( ,god & ! ,_w1 pp4 #afj1 #gb4 #bh ,quot$ by ,bruce1 ,! ,k+dom ( ,god1 p4 #aeg4 ,,! ,,influ5ce ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,^u ,,! ,,conception ,,( ,,religion ,,introduction ,f ! "q ( ! support :i* ,*ri/ian fai? & doctr9e give to ! social consci\sness1 we turn n[ to ! second "p ( our inquiry3 ,h[ does ?is gr[+ social consci\sness1 n by any means always consci\sly religi\s1 naturally react ^u & affect our conceptions ( religion & ( !ological doctr9es8 ,9 ?is inquiry1 we _c always be sure hi/orically ( ! exact connection1 &1 = our pres5t purpose1 ?is is n ( prime importance4 ,b we c see1 = example1 9 ?is second division ( our !me1 ! relations ( religion & ! social consci\sness1 & h[ religion mu/ be conceiv$ if ! social consci\sness is fully w>rant$2 & ?is is ! ma9 "q4 ,if ! def9ition ( !ology :i* has be5 sugge/$ be adopt$--! ?\ghtful & unifi$ expression ( :at religion means to u--!n x is obvi\s t any *ange 9 conception or emphasis 9 religion w necess>ily affect !ological /atem5t4 ,our inquiry z to ! influ5ce ( ! social consci\sness1 !re=e1 naturally beg9s ) religion4 ,! discussions ( ?is division1 moreov]1 w really include all t "p ( !ological doctr9e :i* has to d ) ! gr[? into ! life ) ,god4 ,! natural influ5ce ( ! social consci\sness ^u ! conception ( religion may be1 p]haps1 summ$ up 9 f\r po9ts1 :i* =m ! subjects ( ! f\r succe$+ *apt]s3 7#a7 ,! social consci\sness t5ds to draw religion away f ! falsely my/ical2 7#b7 x t5ds to emphasize ! p]sonal relation 9 religion1 & s keeps ! truly my/ical2 7#c7 x t5ds to emphasize ! e?ical 9 religion2 7#d7 x t5ds to emphasize ! concretely hi/orically ,*ri/ian 9 religion4 ,,*apt] ,v ,,! ,,opposition ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,to ,,! ,,falsely ,,my/ical ,i4 ,,:at ,,is ,,! ,,falsely ,,my/ical8 ,two v cle> answ]s made f diff]5t po9ts ( view des]ve att5tion4 #a4 ,na%'s ,def9ition4--,9 try+ to set =? ! ma9 mood & motives ( religi\s speculation 9 ! e>ly ,*ri/ian c5turies1 ,pr(essor ,na% takes1 z p]haps ! two /ronge/ influ5ces 9 det]m9+ ! type ( man to :om ,*ri/ian apologetics _h !n to appeal1 ,philo & ,plot9us1 & says3 ,by :at road %all ! m9d ent] into a deep & intimate k ( ,god8 ,t is ! decisive "q4 ,plot9us ! ,g5tile & ,philo ! ,jew are at "o 9 _! answ]4 ,! reason mu/ rise above reason+4 ,x mu/ pass into a /ate t is half a swoon & half an ec/asy be=e x c truly "k ,god4 ,philo gave up = ! sake ( 8 !ory1 ! position ( ! prophets4 ,plot9us1 = ! same !ory1 =sook ! position ( ,plato & ,ari/otle4 ,! prophets conceiv$ ! inmo/ ess5ce ( ?+s1 ! be+ & w ( ,god1 z a creative & r$emptive =ce t guid$ & reveal$ itself ?r\gh ! c>e] ( a great national community4 ,plato & ,ari/otle conceiv$ ! ess5ce ( life z a labor ( reason2 &1 = !m1 ! labors ( reason f\nd _! suffici5t refre%m5t & inspiration 9 ^? mom5ts ( cle> syn!sis :i* are ! rew>d ( pati5t analysis4 ,revelation came to ! prophet ?r\gh 8 exp]i5ce ( hi/ory4 ,to ! philosoph] x came ?r\gh h>d & /eady ?9k+4 ,b ,philo & ,plot9us toge!r decl>$ ^! roads to be no ?or\ghf>es4 ,! ,greek & ! ,jew met on ! common gr\nd ( a my/icism t sacrific$ ! ne$s ( sob] reason & ! ne$s ( ! nation to ! necessities ( ! monk4#bi ,my/icism is "h conceiv$ z une?ical1 unhi/orical1 & unrational4 #b4 ,h]rmann's ,def9ition4--,h]rmann's def9ition ( my/icism is ! second "o to :i* att5tion is direct$4 ,he says3 ,:5 ! influ5ce ( ,god ^u ! s\l is s\ght & f\nd solely 9 an inw>d exp]i5ce ( ! individual2 :5 c]ta9 excitem5ts ( ! emotions are tak51 ) no fur!r "q1 z evid5ce t ! s\l is possess$ by ,god2 :51 at ! same "t1 no?+ ext]nal to ! s\l is consci\sly & cle>ly p]ceiv$ & firmly grasp$2 :5 no ?\ghts t elevate ! spiritual life are ar\s$ by ! positive cont5ts ( an idea t rules ! s\l--!n t is ! piety ( my/icism4 ,he :o seeks 9 ?is wise t = ! sake ( :i* he is ready to ab&on all beside1 has /epp$ beyond ! pale ( ,*ri/ian piety4 ,he leaves ,*ri/ & ,*ri/'s ,k+dom altoge!r beh9d him :5 he ent]s t sph]e ( exp]i5ce :i* seems to him to be ! highe/4#cj ,! m>ks ( my/icism = ,h]rmann1 !n1 are3 t x is purely subjective2 t x is m]ely emotional & une?ical2 & h5ce t x has no cle> object1 & is ab/ract1 unrational1 unhi/orical1 & s un*ri/ian4 ,,ii4 ,,! ,,objections ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,to ,,! ,,falsely ,,my/ical ,aga9/ ?is neo-platonic1 falsely my/ical conception ( religion1 ! social consci\sness seems to be cle>ly array$1 &1 s f> z ! social consci\sness influ5ces religion1 x w c]ta9ly t5d to draw x away f ?is falsely my/ical idea4 #a4 ,une?ical4--,=1 9 ! fir/ place1 ?is neo-platonic conception ( religion has no?+ di/9ctly e?ical 9 x4 ,! e?ical is manife/ly n made ! te/ ( true religi\s exp]i5ce1 z x is 9 ! ,new ,te/am5t4 ,! social consci\sness1 on ! o!r h&1 is pr$om9antly & emphatically e?ical1 & c h no?+ to d ) a religion 9 :i* e?ics is ei!r omitt$ or is :olly subord9ate4 ,at ?is po9t1 !re=e1 ! pressure ( ! social consci\sness is /rongly aga9/ a neo-platonic my/icism4 #b4 ,does n ,give a ,real ,p]sonal ,god4--,9 ! second place1 ! social consci\sness _c get along ) ! falsely my/ical1 because x does n give a real p]sonal ,god4 ,let u be cle> ^u ?is po9t4 ,is n ,h]rmann "r :5 he says t all t c be said ( ! ,god ( ?is my/icism is t he is n ! _w8 ,n[ t is precisely all t my/icism has ev] be5 able to say ( ,god z x conceives him4 ,pla9ly1 ! _w & ! conception ( x are all t moves ! s\l :ile x ?9ks ?us ( ,god4 ,only disappo9tm5t c ensue to ! s\l ^: ye>n+ = ,god 9 su* case keeps on insi/+ t ,god mu/ be some?+ utt]ly diff]5t f ! _w4 ,if su* a s\l w reflect a:ile on ! nature ( ! ,god ?us rea*$1 ! fact mu/ inevitably come to ! surface t its :ole consci\sness is occupi$ ) ! _w n[ z x 0 be=e1 = evid5tly x has grasp$ no positive ideas--no?+ b negative ideas--ab\t any?+ else4 ,my/icism frequ5tly passes into pan!ism = ?is v reason1 ev5 9 m5 ( ! highe/ religi\s en]gy2 !y refuse to be satisfi$ ) ! m]e long+ aft] ,god1 or to rema9 on ! way to him1 b det]m9e to rea* ! goal itself1 & re/ ) ,god himself4#ca ,n[ we h already se5 t ! social consci\sness c f9d adequate support & p[] & motive only 9 fai? t its purpose is ,god's purpose1 t ! deepe/ ?+ 9 ! univ]se is an e?ical purpose1 conceivable only 9 a p]sonal ,god2 &1 !re=e1 nei!r an empty negation nor pan!ism c ev] satisfy x4 #c4 ,belittles ! ,p]sonal 9 ,man4--,! false my/icism1 moreov]1 belittles ! p]sonal 9 man z well z 9 ,god2 = x does n treat ) real rev]5ce ei!r ! p]sonality1 ! e?ical fre$om1 ! s5se ( obligation1 or ! reason ( man4 ,?is :ole ?\ght ( a /ate t is half a swoon & half an ec/asy is a sort ( swamp+ ( cle> self-consci\sness & def9ite moral initiative1 9 :i* ! v reality ( man's p]sonality consi/s4 ,x is a hea!n1 n a ,*ri/ian1 idea ( inspiration :i* dem&s ! suppression ( ! human1 :e!r 9 consci\sness1 9 w1 9 reason1 or by belittl+ ! s5se ( obligation to o!rs4 ,b my/icism has at lea/ t5d$ t[>d failure 9 all ^! respects4 ,& yet1 f ! "t t ,paul argu$ ) ! ,cor9?ians aga9/ _! imm5se ov]e/imation ( ! gift ( speak+ ) tongues1 ?is fasc9ation ( ! m]ely my/ical has be5 felt 9 ,*ri/ianity4 7#a7 ,! v my/]y & un9telligibility ( ! exp]i5ce1 7#b7 its ec/atic emotion1 7#c7 its s5se ( be+ controll$ by a p[] beyond "o's self1 & 7#d7 its contra/ ) ord9>y life--all ^! elem5ts make ! my/ical exp]i5ce seem to mo/ all ! m div9e1 al?\gh 9 s judg+ !y are apply+ a pagan1 n a ,*ri/ian1 /&>d4 ,s f> z ^! exp]i5ces h value1 x is probably due to ! /rong & reali/ic s5se :i* !y give ( be+ 9 ! pres5ce ( an ov]p[]+ be+4 ,if ?or\ghly p]meat$ & dom9at$ ) o!r elem5ts1 ?is s5se is n )\t its value4 ,b x is int]e/+ to notice t1 al?\gh ,paul does n d5y ! legitimacy ( ! gift ( speak+ ) tongues1 he nev]!less absolutely subord9ates x1 & insi/s t ! mo/ ec/atic religi\s emotions are completely wor?less )\t love4 ,evid5tly ! consid]ations :i* weigh$ mo/ ) ! ,cor9?ians 9 valu+ ! gift ( un9telligible ec/atic utt]ance weigh$ little ) ,paul2 & "o c see h[ ,paul implicitly argues aga9/ ea* ( ^? consid]ations3 7#a7 ,god is n an unkn[n1 my/ic =ce1 b ! def9ite1 concrete ,god ( "*1 %[n 9 ,*ri/4 7#b7 ,he speaks to reason & w z well z to feel+1 & he be/ speaks to feel+ :5 he speaks to ! :ole man4 ,true religi\s emotion mu/ h a rational basis & mu/ move to duty4 7#c7 ,religion1 he w\ld urge1 is a self-controll$ & volunt>y surr5d] to a p]sonal ,god ( "*1 n a passive be+ swept away by an unkn[n emotion4 7#d7 ,god has mo/ to give1 be assur$1 he w\ld h add$1 9 ! common ways ( life4 ,n[1 9 e "o ( ^! prote/s1 ! social consci\sness in/9ctively jo9s4 ,x _c re/ 9 a conception ( religion t belittles ! p]sonal 9 ,god or man2 = x is itself an emphatic insi/5ce ^u ! fully p]sonal4 ,& x c1 lea/ ( all1 get on ) ! my/ical ignor+ ( ! rational & ! e?ical1 = x holds t ! social evolution moves /eadily on to a rational l-m9d$ness1 & to a def9itely e?ical civilization4 ,gidd+s puts ! sociological conclusion 9 a s5t5ce3 ,x is ! rational1 e?ical consci\sness t ma9ta9s social cohesion 9 a progressive democracy4#cb ,n[ t :i* is cle>ly recogniz$ z ! goal 9 ! relations ( man to man w n be set aside z unw>rant$ or subord9ate 9 ! relations ( man to ,god4 ,& we may dep5d ^u x4 #d4 ,leaves ! ,hi/orically1 ,concretely ,*ri/ian4--,once m1 ! social consci\sness _c approve ( ! my/ical conception ( religion 9 its ignor+1 9 its highe/ /ate1 ! hi/orically & concretely ,*ri/ian4 ,) my/icism's subjective1 emotional1 & ab/ract conception ( ! highe/ communion ) ,god1 & ( ! way !reto1 ! hi/orical & concrete at be/ c be to x only subord9ate means1 m or less my/]i\sly connect$ ) ! atta9m5t ( ! goal1 & left beh9d :5 once ! goal is rea*$4 ,! social consci\sness1 on ! o!r h&1 requires hi/orical ju/ification1 & def9itely builds on ! facts ( ! hi/orical social evolution4 ,9 ! case ( ! prophets & psalmi/s1 = example1 :o alone 9 ! anci5t _w mo/ fully anticipat$ ! mod]n social feel+1 ! social consci\sness pla9ly arose 9 ! face ( ! concrete hi/orical life ( a p4 ,no result ( mod]n ,old ,te/am5t criticism is m c]ta94 ,s t1 speak+ ( ! religi\s aspects ( ! social /ruggle 9 ,israel1 ,mc,curdy c use ?is /rong language3 ,x is n too mu* to say t ?is conflict1 int5se1 un9t]rupt$1 & prolong$1 is ! v he>t ( ! religion ( ! ,old ,te/am5t1 its mo/ reg5]ative & propulsive movem5t4 ,to ! p]sonal life ( ! s\l1 ! only basis ( a pot5tial1 _w-mov+ religion1 x gave en]gy & dep?1 assurance & hopefulness1 repose & self-control1 ) an outlook cle> & et]nal4#cc ,b x 0 ?is /&po9t ( ! prophets t ! falsely my/ical conception ( religion ab&on$4 ,we may well take to he>t1 9 our e/imate ( my/icism1 ! gradual b /eady elim9ation ( ec/asy 9 ! developm5t ( ,israel1 & its practically total abs5ce 9 ^? we c\nt 9 ! highe/ s5se prophets4#cd ,! social consci\sness1 moreov]1 has almo/ entirely to d ) m51 & h5ce naturally mu/ lay /ress on human hi/ory1 r ?an on nature1 z a s\rce ( religi\s ideas4 ,inde$1 x w h no d\bt t :at nature is made to mean religi\sly w be *iefly det]m9$ by ! preval5t social ideals4 ,x c1 !re=e1 lea/ ( all ignore ! hi/orical 9 ,*ri/ianity4 ,! social consci\sness recognizes increas+ly1 too1 ) ! cle>+ ( its own ideals & ) ! deep5+ /udy ( ! tea*+ ( ,jesus1 t x really is only dem&+1 9 ! concrete1 & 9 detail$ application to p>ticul> problems1 & to all ( !m1 ! _s %[n 9 its fullness only 9 ,*ri/1 z ,pr(essor ,peabody's em95tly sane treatm5t ( ! social tea*+ ( ,jesus seems to me fairly to h prov54 ,! social consci\sness1 !re=e1 _c help becom+ m & m consci\sly & emphatically ,*ri/ian4 ,9 a s+le s5t5ce1 because ( ! /eps ( its own long evolution1 ! social consci\sness in/9ctively di/ru/s ! highly emotional1 unless x is manife/ly "u equally /rong rational control1 & unless x has equal e?ical insight & p[]1 & is hi/orically ju/ifi$4 ,x t5ds1 !re=e1 necess>ily to draw away f ! falsely my/ical 9 religion1 :i* is lack+ 9 all ^! respects4 ,& ! same reasons1 :i* array ! social consci\sness aga9/ ! falsely my/ical 9 religion1 lead x into natural sympa?y ) a positive emphasis ^u ! p]sonal1 ! e?ical1 & ! hi/orically concretely ,*ri/ian 9 religion4 #bi ,na%1 ,e?ics & ,revelation1 p4 #cc4 #cj ,h]rmann1 ,! ,communion ( ! ,*ri/ian ) ,god1 pp4 #ai1 #bj4 #ca ,h]rmann1 ,op4 cit41 p4 #bg4 #cb ,gidd+s1 ,elem5ts ( ,sociology1 p4 #cba2 cf4 also pp4 #aee ff1 #cjb1 #cbj1 #cbg4 #cc ,mc,curdy1 ,hi/ory1 ,prophecy1 & ! ,monum5ts1 ,vol4 ,,ii1 p4 #bbc2 cf4 pp4 #bad1 ff4 #cd ,g4 ,a4 ,smi?1 ,! ,book ( ! ,twelve ,prophets1 ,vol4 ,i1 pp4 #cj1 #hd1 #hi2 ,cornill1 ,! ,prophets ( ,israel1 pp4 #da1 #df2 ,! ,expository ,times1 ,jan41 ,feb41 #aijb1 article1 ,prophetic ,ec/asy4 ,,*apt] ,,vi ,,! ,,emphasis ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,^u ,,! ,,p]sonal ,,relation ,,9 ,,religion1 ,,& ,,s ,,^u ,,! ,,truly ,,my/ical ,i4 ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,t5ds ,,positively ,,to ,,emphasize ,,! ,,p]sonal ,,relation ,,9 ,,religion #a4 ,emphasizes ,ev]y:]e ! ,p]sonal4--,! social consci\sness sees man z prem95tly ! social animal1 made = p]sonal relations1 irrevocably & ess5tially knit up ) o!r p]sons4 ,x deep5s ev]y:]e our s5se ( p]sons & ( p]sonal relations4 ,x may be itself almo/ def9$ z ! s5se ( ! fully p]sonal4 ,religion1 !n1 if x is to be mo/ real to m5 ( ! social consci\sness1 mu/ be p]sonally conceiv$1 t is1 mu/ be di/9ctly se5 to be a p]sonal relation ( man to ,god4 ,& ?is conception1 z ! highe/ we c rea*1 is to be foll[$ fe>lessly to ! end2 only gu>d+ x aga9/ wrong inf]5ces f ! simple transf]5ce to ,god ( f9ite conditions1 & recogniz+ exactly 9 :at respects ! p]sonal relation to ,god is unique4#ce ,! social consci\sness1 moreov]1 z we h se51 mu/ h a conception ( religion t c really ju/ify ! social consci\sness1 &1 !re=e1 mu/ d ju/ice to ! fully p]sonal 9 ,god & man2 & ?is ne$ also leads ! social consci\sness naturally to ! conception ( religion z a p]sonal relation4 #b4 ,requires ! ,laws ( a ,deep5+ ,fri5d%ip 9 ,religion4--,:5 ?is conception is c>ri$ out1 x is f\nd t gr[? 9 ! religi\s life1 9 communion ) ,god1 foll[s ! laws ( a deep5+ fri5d%ip4#cf ,^! laws c1 !re=e1 be kn[n & /udi$ & =mulat$2 & religion1 at ! same "t1 ceases to be un9telligible & ceases to be isolat$--cut (f f ! re/ ( life1 & becomes r t "o great fundam5tal relation :i* gives be+ & mean+ & value to all ! re/4 ,9 absolute h>mony1 !n1 ) ! g5esis ( ! social consci\sness1 religion1 9 ?is conception1 is b\nd up ) ! :ole ( life2 & we cat* a glimpse ( ! real & f9al unity ( life 9 true love1 ! relation to ,god & ! relation to man ea* help+ ev]y:]e ! o!r4 ,if religion is truly a p]sonal relation1 & its laws are ^? ( a deep5+ fri5d%ip1 !n e human relation1 he>tily & truly fulfill$1 becomes a new outlook on ,god1 a revelation ( new possibilities 9 ! religi\s life4 ,&1 on ! o!r h&1 9 t mutual self-revelation & answ]+ tru/ ^u :i* e gr[+ p]sonal relation is built1 e fre% revelation ( ,god is an enl>g+ ( our ideal = our relations to o!rs4 ,ev5 biblical lit]ature1 p]haps1 furni%es no m p]fect example ( ! int]play ( ! human & div9e relations ?an ,hosea's acc\nt ( 8 own provid5tial lead+ ?r\gh ! human relation into ! div9e1 & back aga9 f ! div9e to a /ill bett] human4 #c4 ,requires ! ,ideal ,conditions ( ! ,ri*e/ ,life 9 ,religion4--,& if religion is to be ju/ifi$ 9 its supreme claims by ! social consci\sness1 x mu/ be felt to (f]1 besides1 ! ideal conditions ( ! ri*e/ life4 ,z a p]sonal relation to ,god1 religion ne$ n %r9k f ?is te/4 ,our great ne$s are "* & happ9ess4 ,psy*ology seems to me to po9t to two great means & to two accompany+ conditions ( bo? "* & happ9ess4 ,! means are association & "w2 ! correspond+ conditions are rev]5ce = p]sonality1 & objectivity--! mood ( bo? love & "w4 ,! great ess5tials1 !re=e1 to ! ri*e/ life are 7#a7 association 9 :i* p]sonality is respect$1 & 7#b7 "w 9 :i* "o c lose himself4 ,n[1 :5 w\ld ^! conditions become ideal8 ,on ! "o h&1 z to association1 :5 ! association is ) him :o is ( ! highe/ "* & ( ! inf9itely ri*e/ life1 & relation to :om is fundam5tal to e o!r p]sonal relation2 :51 secondly1 ,god is made concrete & real to u 9 an adequate p]sonal revelation ( 8 "*1 & ( 8 love t[>d u2 & :51 ?ird1 ! association is individualiz$ = ea* "o1 :o ?r[s himself op5 to ,god1 9 ,god's spiritual pres5ce 9 u1 con/antly & intimately1 & yet unobtrusively1 cop]at+ ) u4 ,&1 on ! o!r h&1 z to "w1 :5 ! "w is ,god-giv5 "w1 to :i* "o is set ap>t1 & 9 :i* he may lose himself ) joy4 ,^! are ! ideal conditions ( ! ri*e/ life4 ,j ^! ideal conditions ,jesus decl>$ actualities4 ,= ! fulfilm5t ( j ^!1 9 ! case ( 8 disciples1 he pray$ 9 8 d\ble petition1--,keep !m1 ,sanctify !m1 ,keep !m 9 ?y "n1 t is1 ?r\gh ! div9e association4 ,sanctify !m--set !m ap>t unto _! ,god-giv5 "w4 ,z ?\ ha/ s5t me into ! _w1 ev5 s h ,i also s5t !m into ! _w4 ,su* a conception ( religion c fairly claim to meet1 broadly & deeply1 ! mo/ exact+ dem&s ( ! social consci\sness = emphasis ^u ! p]sonal relation 9 religion4 ,,ii4 ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,?us ,,keeps ,,! ,,truly ,,my/ical ,i h no pr$ilection = ! t]m my/ical1 & w\ld gladly conf9e x to :at ,i h t]m$ ! neo-platonic or falsely my/ical1 7 x n t1 9 spite ( ! diction>ies & ! hi/ories ( philosophy & ! hi/ories ( doctr9e1 ! t]m is us$ 9 two q diff]5t s5ses4 ,_m1 x seems to me1 are def5d+ :at !y call ! my/ical 9 religion1 :o h no idea ( def5d+ :at ,h]rmann & ,na% call my/ical4 ,& _m1 on ! o!r h&1 are def5d+ & tea*+ ! falsely my/ical ?r\gh an undef9$ fe> t else !y w lose ! truly my/ical4 ,!ology & religion bo? greatly ne$ a cle> discrim9ation ( t]ms "h4 ,_m are involv$1 9 bo? liv+ & ?9k+1 9 a self-contradiction1 :i* !y feel b _c /ate2 & are urg+ ) !mselves & ) o!rs a means ( religi\s life & a correspond+ me?od ( conception1 :i* really contradict _! highe/ convictions 9 o!r l9es ( life & ?\ght4 ,c we f9d our way out ( ?is confusion8 ,if "o /udies c>efully ! hi/orical repres5tatives ( my/icism1 & especially su* a /rong type z ,jacob ,bhme1 :om ,erdmann calls ! culm9ation ( my/icism1 & /ill keeps 8 head1 c]ta9 dang]s 9 my/icism1 x w\ld seem1 mu/ become app>5t4 ,& x may be wor? :ile to attempt a brief1 b def9ite1 analysis ( ! ju/ifiable & unju/ifiable elem5ts 9 ^! my/ical movem5ts4 #a4 ,! ,ju/ifiable & ,unju/ifiable ,elem5ts 9 ,my/icism4--7#a7 ,! fir/ dang] 9 my/icism seems to me to be ! t5d5cy to make simple emotion ! supreme te/ ( ! religi\s /ate4 ,:e!r ?is emotion is ?\ght ( z ec/atic--su* z "s ( ! old my/ics call$ be+ drunk ) ,god1 or1 z quieti/ic--9 :i* imp]turbability1 passionlessness1 become ! highe/ good--is comp>atively indiff]5t4 ,! ju/ifiable elem5t "h is ! insi/5ce t religion is real & is life2 = feel+ is p]haps ! mo/ p[]ful elem5t 9 ! s5se ( reality4 ,s ,james says3 ,speak+ g5]ally1 ! m a conceiv$ object excites u1 ! m reality x has4#cg ,! unju/ifiable elem5t is ! p]il\s subjection ( ! rational & e?ical4 ,su* a view mu/ always lack any positive & adequate conception ( our active life & vocation 9 ! _w4 7#b7 ,a second closely connect$ dang] 9 my/icism is ! t5d5cy t[>d m]e subjectivism4 ,!re is "h a ju/ifiable elem5t 9 ! emphasis on "o's own p]sonal conviction & fai?2 an unju/ifiable elem5t 9 ! t5d5cy to und]rate any?+ b ! purely subjective1 to ignore all correct+ influ5ces f o!rs1 f ! *ur*1 & f ! ,scriptures4 7#c7 ,a ?ird dang] foll[s f ?is3 ! m>k$ t5d5cy to und]e/imate ! hi/orical4 ,! ju/ifiable elem5t "h is1 aga91 ! emphasis on p]sonal conviction & fai?2 ! unju/ifiable elem5t is ! t5d5cy t[>d ! greate/ "o-sid$ness1 & t[>d empt9ess1 especially ( e?ical cont5t4 ,advis+ our "y p simply to li/5 to ,god1 )\t ! /ronge/ insi/5ce ^u ! hi/orical revelation ( ,god at ! same "t1 is expos+ !m to ! great dang] ( mi/ak+ = an indubitable1 div9e revelation ! v]ie/ vag>y t may *ance 9 _! empty-m9d$ness next to come into _! ?\ght4 ,) ! reason 9 suppos$ abeyance1 ! door is ?us ?r[n op5 to ! grosse/ sup]/itions4 ,hone/ attempts to deep5 ! religi\s life may ?us become dang]\s assaults ^u true religion4 7#d7 ,a f\r? dang] 9 my/icism is s /rong a t5d5cy t[>d vagu5ess1 t ! common m9d is n )\t w>rant 9 id5tify+ my/icism & mi/9ess4 ,! ju/ifiable elem5t "h is 9 ! real difficulty ( express+ ! full cont5t ( ! entire religi\s exp]i5ce2 ! unju/ifiable elem5t is1 once m1 ! slight+ ( ! hi/orical1 ! e?ical1 & ! rational1 especially 9 talk+ mu* ( ! contradictions ( reason1 & ( :at is above reason4 ,my/icism naturally lacks positive cont5t4 7#e7 ,ano!r dang]--! t5d5cy t[>d pan!ism--comes 9 p>tly1 z ,h]rmann has sugge/$1 z a meet+ ( ?is lack ( cont5t1 & p>tly z ! logical outcome ( su* an insi/5ce ^u los+ oneself 9 ,god z am\nts to a be+ swept out ( "o's self--a loss ( cle> & rational self-consci\sness1 :i* is next int]pret$ speculatively z a real absorption 9 ,god1 & is !n made ! goal4 ,?is is ! famili> road ( ,indian & neo-platonic my/icism1 & its ph5om5a are real en\gh1 b probably ( only ! slighte/ religi\s significance4 ,t5nyson tells some:]e ( ! imm5se s5se ( illum9ation t came to him once f simply repeat+ monoton\sly 8 own "n--,alfr$ ,t5nyson1 ,alfr$ ,t5nyson4 ,?is may be z effective z look+ at ! end ( "o's nose & ceaselessly reit]at+ ,om1 z does ! ,h9du ascetic4 ,a /ill %ort] & m c]ta9 me?od is ?r\gh nitr\s-oxide-gas intoxication1 ( :i* ,pr(essor ,james says3 ,) me1 z ) e o!r p]son ( :om ,i h he>d1 ! key-note ( ! exp]i5ce is ! trem5d\sly excit+ s5se ( an int5se metaphysical illum9ation4 ,tru? lies op5 to ! view 9 dep? b5ea? dep? ( almo/ bl9d+ evid5ce4 ,! m9d sees all ! logical relations ( be+ ) an app>5t subtlety & in/antaneity1 to :i* its normal consci\sness (f]s no p>allel2 only z sobriety returns1 ! feel+ ( insight fades1 & "o is left />+ vacantly at a few disjo9t$ words & phrases z "o />es at a cadav]\s-look+ sn[-peak f :i* ! sunset gl[ has j fl$1 or at ! black c9d] left by an ext+ui%$ br&4 ,! imm5se emotional s5se ( reconciliation1 he felt to be ! *>act]i/ic mood4 ,x is impossible to convey1 he says1 an idea ( ! torr5tial "* ( ! id5tification ( opposites z x /reams ?r\gh ! m9d 9 ?is exp]i5ce4#ch ,n[ x is n safe to ignore su* facts1 :5 we are s]i\sly try+ to e/imate ! religi\s significance ( int5se emotional exp]i5ces1 ! reality ( :i* we ne$ n at all "q4 ,! vital "q is1 n t ( ! reality ( ! exp]i5ces1 b t ( ! real cause ( ! exp]i5ces2 & ! only possible te/ ( ?is is rational & e?ical4 ,b f ?is te/1 my/icism t5ds f ! />t to %ut itself (f1 & s1 assum+ ! exp]i5ce to be truly religi\s1 ends (t5 9 virtual pan!ism4 ,! ju/ifiable elem5t 9 ?is insi/5ce ^u absorption 9 ,god is ! necess>y moral relation ( complete surr5d] to ,god4 ,! unju/ifiable elem5t is 9 belittl+ ! p]sonal 9 bo? ,god & man1 & 9 mak+ ess5tially religi\s an exp]i5ce t has almo/ no?+ ( ! rational & e?ical 9 x1 & t1 on t v acc\nt1 fo/]s ! irrev]5t famili>ity ) ,*ri/ s deplor$ by m ?an "o c>eful /ud5t ( my/icism4 ,a natural & common & mo/ dang]\s accompanim5t ( su* an int5se emotional exp]i5ce is ! t5d5cy aft]w>d1 to excuse s9 9 oneself4 ,9 ! case ( ! mo/ consci5ti\s1 x is wor? not+1 su* an emphasis ^u int5se exp]i5ces t5ds to lead !m to di/ru/ ! reality ( ! normal ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce if !y h n _h ^! int5se emotions1 or if !y h _h !m1 t5ds to br+ !m into despair :5 !y f9d ^! m>k$ exp]i5ces actually prov+ less p[]ful 9 effects ^u life ?an !y _h expect$4 7#f7 ,! la/ dang] 9 my/icism1 to :i* ref]5ce w be made1 is ! t5d5cy to extravagant symbolism4 ,?is is closely connect$ ) ! imm5se emotional s5se ( reconciliation1 & is mu* /rong] by nature 9 "s ?an 9 o!rs4 ,! born my/ic f9ds 8 own subjective views symboliz$ ev]y:]e1 & is 9 grave dang] ( be+ l$ into an +5i\s1 practically unconsci\s intellectual di%one/y4 ,! ju/ifiable elem5t "h is t s5se ( ! unity & wor? ( ?+s :i* is ! mo/ fundam5tal conviction ( our m9ds4 ,! unju/ifiable elem5t has be5 suffici5tly indicat$4 ,! ju/ifiable elem5ts 9 my/icism1 !n1 may be said to include3 ! insi/5ce on ! legitimate place ( feel+ 9 religion z a real & vital exp]i5ce2 ! emphasis on "o's own conviction & fai?2 ! real difficulty ( express+ ! full mean+ ( ! religi\s exp]i5ce2 ! dem& = a complete e?ical surr5d] to ,god2 & ! fai? 9 ! real unity & wor? ( ! _w 9 ,god4 ,n[ if "o tries to br+ toge!r ^! ju/ifiable elem5ts 9 my/icism1 ! truly my/ical may all be summ$ up z simply a prote/ 9 favor ( ! :ole man--! entire p]sonality4 ,x says t m5 c exp]i5ce & live & feel & d mu* m ?an !y c logically =mulate1 def9e1 expla91 or ev5 fully express4 ,liv+ is m ?an ?9k+4 #b4 ,! ,prote/ 9 ,favor ( ! ,:ole ,man4--,! elem5t to :i* my/icism has tri$ mo/ to d ju/ice is feel+1 & s x has be5 liable to a new & dang]\s "o-sid$ness4 ,b ! truly my/ical mu/ be a prote/ alike aga9/ a n>r[ juiceless intellectualism1 aga9/ a n>r[ morali/ic rigorism1 & aga9/ a bl9d & sp9eless s5tim5talism4 ,x is a prote/ p>ticul>ly aga9/ mak+ ! ma!matico-me*anical view ( ! _w ! only view2 aga9/ mak+ logical consi/5cy ! sole te/ ( tru? or reality2 aga9/ ignor+ all data1 except ^? :i* come ?r\gh ! intellect alone2 t is1 aga9/ try+ to make a "p1 n ! :ole1 ( man ! /&>d2 9 o!r words1 aga9/ ignor+ ! data :i* come ?r\gh feel+ & w--emotional1 /hetic1 e?ical1 & religi\s data1 z well z ^? judgm5ts ( wor? :i* und]lie reason's !oretical det]m9ations4 ,man /&s1 9 fact1 ev]y:]e face to face ) an actual _w ( great complexity1 t seems to him at fir/ :at ,james says ! baby's _w is1 "o big bloom+ buzz+ confusion2 & ! univ]se ( all ( u is /ill to a great ext5t su* a confusion1 pot5tially resolvable1 & dem&+ to be resolv$1 b n yet actually resolv$1 into p>ts4#ci ,9 "o s5se1 man's :ole task is to ?9k unity & ord] into ?is confusion4 ,! problem really becomes t ( ?9k+ ! univ]se ?r\gh 9 sev]al k9ds ( t]ms1 & !n f9ally br++ all toge!r into "o compreh5sive view4 ,all ^! are alike ideals :i* ! m9d sets be=e itself4 ,! easie/ ( ^! problems is ! attempt to ?9k ! _w ?r\gh1 9 ma!matico-me*anical t]ms4 ,b ! attempt to ?9k ! _w ?r\gh 9 /hetic or e?ical or religi\s t]ms is equally legitimate1 ?\gh x is m difficult4 ,n only1 !n1 is ! ma!matico-me*anical view n ! sole ju/ifiable view1 b x really has its ju/ification 9 an ideal1 & success 9 ?is attempt af=ds j enc\ragem5t = ! hope ( success 9 ! o!r m difficult problems4#dj ,! truly my/ical holds1 !n1 t ! n>r[ intellectualism is unw>rant$1 because natural sci5ce1 ! me*anical view ( ! _w1 is itself an ideal--! *ild ( duties1 z ,mn/]b]g calls x--& s _c legitimately rule out o!r ideals2 because we h j z imm$iate a conviction conc]n+ ! wor?1 z conc]n+ ! logical consi/5cy ( ! _w2 because a n>r[ intellectualism w\ld make consci\s life b a b>r5 rehe>sal ( ! out] _w1 )\t significance2 because if we c tru/ ! indications ( our intellect1 we ought to be able to tru/ ! indications ( ! re/ ( our nature2 & because1 ?us1 ! only possible key & /&>d ( tru? & reality are 9 ourselves--! :ole self1 & necessities ( ?\ght become necessities ( a reason :i* means loyally to take acc\nt ( all ! data ( ! entire man4 ,& ! same po9t may be ?us /at$4 ,we use ! ^w rational 9 two q di/9ct s5ses3 9 ! n>r[ s5se1 z mean+ simply ! intellectual2 9 ! broad s5se1 z indicat+ ! dem&s ( ! entire man4 ,! true my/icism /&s = ! broadly rational4 ,s1 too1 we speak ( ! necess>y fundam5tal assumption ( ! hone/y or s9c]ity ( ! _w2 b ?is includes two q di/9ct propositions3 "o1 t ! _w mu/ be ?9kable1 conceivable1 con/ruable1 a logically consi/5t :ole1 a sph]e = rational ?9k+1--:]e ! te/ is consi/5cy2 ! o!r1 t ! _w mu/ be wor? :ile1 mu/ n mock our highe/ ideals & aspirations1 mu/ 9 "s true & g5u9e s5se satisfy ! :ole man1 be a sph]e = rational liv+1--:]e ! te/ is wor?4 ,all our argum5ts g =w>d ^u ^! two assumptions4 ,n[1 a true my/icism cont5ds t ! second pr9ciple is z rational z ! fir/1 ?\gh x mu/ be freely grant$ t x is n z easy to employ x = detail$ conclusions1 & x is consequ5tly mu* m liable to abuse4 ,! true my/icism wi%es to be n less1 b m1 rational4 ,x kn[s no %or?& sub/itute = ! h>d & /eady ?9k+ ( ! philosoph]1 or = ! hi/orical exp]i5ce ( ! prophet2 x ne$s & uses bo?4 ,9 all ?is1 x is pla9 t ! truly my/ical is a legitimate outgr[? ( ! emphasis ( ! social consci\sness ^u recognition ( ! entire p]sonality4 ,phillips ,brooks f9ds j ?is 9 ! intellectual life ( ,jesus4 ,! great fact conc]n+ x is ?is1 he says1 t 9 him ! intellect nev] works alone4 ,y nev] c sep>ate its work+s f ! complete op]ation ( ! entire nature4 ,he nev] simply kn[s1 b always loves & resolves at ! same "t4#da #c4 ,! ,self-,controll$ ,recognition ( ,emotion4--,moreov]1 x probably may be fairly claim$ t all ( ! my/ical recognition ( ! emotional :i* is valuable or ev5 legitimate1 is pres]v$1 & f> m safely & sanely conceiv$1 9 a /rictly p]sonal conception ( religion4 ,x may well be d\bt$1 if x is possible 9 any o!r way1 bo? to d ju/ice to feel+ 9 religion1 & at ! same "t to keep feel+ 9 its prop] place4 ,is x possible briefly to indicate bo? ! recognition ( emotion & ! control ( emotion 9 religion8 ,! true my/icism recognizes t ! supreme joy is joy 9 p]sonal life--joy 9 ent]+ into ! revelation ( a p]son2 & x believes ) reason t a gr[+ acqua9tance ) ,god mu/ h su* heights & dep?s ( mean+ z no o!r p]sonal relation c h4 ,x is n1 !re=e1 afraid or di/ru/ful ( true emotion--( joy or peace1 ( int5se long+ or ( ke5 satisfaction--9 ! religi\s life4 ,b ! true my/icism kn[s at ! same "t t deep revelation ( a p]son is made only to ! rev]5t1 t ! conditions are 9 ! highe/ degree e?ical1 & above all mu/ be recogniz$ to be s 9 religion4 ,x does view1 !n1 ) deep di/ru/ an emotional emphasis 9 religion t ignores ! e?ical4 ,x _c =get t ,*ri/ ?\ght t ev]y?+ mu/ be te/$ by its fruits 9 life4 ,paul1 too1 insi/$ on apply+ ! te/ ( an active m9i/]+ love to ! highly valu$ emotional exp]i5ces ( ! ,cor9?ians2 & writes to ! ,galatians t !re is b "o infallible pro( ( ! work+ ( ! ,_s 9 !m--a righte\s life3 love1 joy1 peace1 longsuff]+1 g5tl5ess1 goodness1 fai?1 meekness1 temp]ance4 ,& a true my/icism kn[s t ! _s1 rev]5t ( p]sonality1 leads to a self-re/ra9t t does n seek ! emotional exp]i5ce simply z su* on any conditions2 b1 kn[+ ! supreme psy*ological conditions ( happ9ess & "* & influ5ce1 x loses itself 9 an unselfi% love & 9 absorb+ "w1 & und]/&s t x mu/ simply let ! exp]i5ces come4 ,x w h no?+1 !re=e1 to d ) /ra9$ emotion1 or ) ! work+ up ( feel+ = its own sake4 ,x seeks heal?1 n m]ely ! signs ( heal?4 ,x prizes1 !re=e1 ! joy t simply proclaims itself z ! sign ( ! normal life & s positively /r5g!ns & *e]s1 b x w h no?+ ( ! /ra9 ( emotion :i* is dra94 ,x is int]e/+ to notice t x is exactly ?is true psy*ological attitude conc]n+ ! emotional life t ,phillips ,brooks believ$ t he f\nd p]fectly reflect$ 9 ,jesus4 ,! s5sitiv5ess ( ,jesus to pa9 & joy1 he says1 nev] leads him = a mom5t to try to be sad or happy ) direct endeavor2 nor1 is !re any sign t he ev] judges ! real "* ( himself or any o!r man by ! sadness or ! happ9ess t = ! mom5t cov]s 8 life4 ,he simply lives1 & joy & sorr[ issue f 8 liv+1 & ca/ _! brightness & _! gloom9ess back ^u 8 life2 b !re is no sorr[ & no joy t he ev] s\ght = itself1 & he always kept a self-k und]nea? ! joy or sorr[1 undi/urb$ by ! mom5t's happ9ess or unhapp9ess4#db ,h[ f> f ?is objectivity & ?is heal?ful emotional life is ! atmosph]e ( mo/ ( our devotional books1 &1 "o might say1 ( all ! manuals ( ord9>y my/icism6 ,t ?is difficulty %\ld confront u 9 devotional lit]ature is v natural2 = su* writ+ commonly aims to give ! emotional s5se ( reality 9 religion2 & is1 !re=e1 p>ticul>ly "u ! temptation to %[ & to produce a /ra9+ aft] ! emotion1 z = its own sake4 ,moreov]1 ! v introspection1 almo/ inevitably involv$ 9 ! read+ & writ+ ( devotional books1 t5ds to br+ ab\t an artificial *ange 9 ! religi\s exp]i5ce1 & s to introduce into x ! abnormal4 ,b ! social consci\sness1 s f> z x affects religion1 n only t5ds to draw away f ! falsely my/ical1 & to emphasize ! p]sonal1 & s to keep ! truly my/ical1 b x is ev5 m pla9 t x mu/ t5d to insi/ ^u ! e?ical 9 religion4 #ce ,cf4 ,k+1 ,recon/ruction 9 ,!ology1 p4 #bja ff4 #cf ,op4 cit41 pp4 #baj ff4 #cg ,james1 ,psy*ology1 ,vol4 ,,ii1 p4 #cjg4 #ch ,james1 ,! ,w to ,believe1 pp4 #bid1 #bie4 #ci ,psy*ology1 ,brief] ,c\rse1 p4 #af4 #dj ,cf4 ,james1 ,psy*ology1 ,vol4 ,,ii1 #fcc-fgg2 especially #fcc1 #fcd1 #ffg1 #fga1 #fgg2 ,mn/]b]g1 ,psy*ology & ,life1 pp4 #bc-bh4 #da ,brooks1 ,! ,influ5ce ( ,jesus1 p4 #bai4 #db ,! ,influ5ce ( ,jesus1 p4 #aef4 ,,*apt] ,,vii ,,! ,,?or\gh ,,e?iciz+ ,,( ,,religion ,i4 ,,! ,,pressure ,,( ,,! ,,problem ,! social consci\sness looks to ! ?or\gh e?iciz+ ( religion4 ,if ! social consci\sness is to be reg>d$ z hi/orically ju/ifi$1 x mu/ believe t ?is gr[+ s5se ( bro!rhood & consequ5t obligation is simply our response to ! on-work+ ( ,god's own plan1 ,god's own w express+ itself 9 u4 ,! purpose to recognize ! w ( ,god1 ?us necess>ily involves ! recognition ( human relations1 s9ce1 z soon z consci5ce is /rongly /irr$ 9 any direction1 religion c b feel1 9 ?is dem& ( consci5ce1 ! dem& ( ,god1 &1 !re=e1 mu/ br+ ! convictions ( ! social consci\sness into religion4 ,inde$1 x may be well believ$ t ,kaftan is "r 9 8 insi/5ce t x is exactly ?r\gh ! practical1 t is1 9 ! realm ( ! e?ical1 t k arises f fai?4#dc ,9 any case1 x is evid5t t ! old problem ( fai? & works1 ( religion & e?ics1 ( ! fir/ & second comm&m5ts1 meets u "h 9 a way n to be put aside4 ,) an e?ical dem& s insi/5t z t ( ! social consci\sness no religion c be at peace t is n ) equal insi/5ce e?ical4 ,we are b\nd1 !n1 to %[ h[ communion ) ,god1 ! supreme desire to f9d ,god1 necess>ily c>ries ) x active love = m54 ,we mu/ %[ h[ we truly commune ) ,god 9 su* active s]vice4 ,! social consci\sness1 ?us1 positively ?ru/s ^u e religi\s man1 :o believes 9 x1 ! problem ( ! ?or\gh e?iciz+ ( religion4 ,or1 to put ! matt] 9 a slightly diff]5t way1 if ! s5se ( ! value & ! sacr$ness ( ! p]son is "o ( ! two greate/ moral convictions ( our "t1 !n religion mu/ be cle>ly se5 to hold ?is conviction1 or lose its connection ) :at is mo/ real & vital to u4 ,?is is ! problem4 ,,ii4 ,,! ,,/atem5t ,,( ,,! ,,problem ,all w probably agree t religion is communion ) ,god4 ,we h se5 :y ! social consci\sness _c accept a falsely my/ical view ( t communion4 ,= simil> reasons1 x mu/ make absolutely subord9ate all non-e?ical & simply my/]i\s means :i* make no appeal to ! consci5ce & to ! reason--! falsely sacram5tal4 ,only ! p]son is truly sacram5tal4 ,mu* else may be ( value1 b ! t\* ( p]sonal life is ! only absolute ess5tial 9 religion4 ,we h se51 also1 :y ! social consci\sness t5ds to reg>d religion z a /rictly p]sonal relation4 ,our problem ?us becomes3 ,h[ does ! desire = p]sonal relation ) ,god1 ! desire = ,god himself1 lead directly into ! e?ical life--into ! full & practical recognition ( ! e?ical dem&s ( ! social consci\sness8 ,to gu>d aga9/ any possible misconception1 x is1 p]haps1 well to say at ! />t t ! desire = a p]sonal relation ) ,god has no purpose ( return+ by ano!r r\te to ! false position ( my/icism1 9 ! claim ( special private revelations t are exclusively = x4 ,x expects1 r1 p]sonal conviction ( t great revelation t is common to all1 &1 moreov]1 x kn[s well t no p]sonal relation is ess5tially s5su\s1 & x c]ta9ly looks = no s5su\s relation to ,god4 ,x may be wor? :ile1 too1 to rev]se our "q = a mom5t1 & ask h[ morality necess>ily involves religion4 ,! true moral life is ! fulfilm5t ( all p]sonal relations1 & z su* c lea/ ( all omit ! greate/ & mo/ fundam5tal relation :i* gives be+ & mean+ & value to all ! re/--! relation to ,god4 ,! fully moral life1 !re=e1 mu/ include religion4 ,! unity ( ! two may be ?us se54 ,b ! pres5t inquiry looks at ! matt] f ! o!r side1 & seeks a c>eful & ?or\ghgo+ answ] to ! "q3 ,:y is ! ,*ri/ian religion1 z a p]sonal relation to ,god1 necess>ily e?ical8 ,,iii4 ,,! ,,answ] #a4 ,involv$ 9 ,relation to ,*ri/4--,9 ! fir/ place1 !n1 x probably may be safely claim$ t !re is no te/ ( ! moral life ( a man s c]ta9 z 8 attitude t[>d ,*ri/4 ,sett+ aside1 n[1 any special religi\s claims ( ,*ri/ altoge!r1 & recogniz+ him only z e>?'s highe/ "*1 ! supreme arti/ 9 liv+1 :o kn[s ! secret ( ! moral life m surely & m p]fectly ?an any o!r1 he becomes ev5 s ! sure/ t\*-/one ( "*2 & ! iron fil+s w n be m c]ta9ly attract$ to ! magnet ?an w ! m5 ( highe/ "* be attract$ to ,*ri/ :5 he is really se5 z he is4 ,!re is no te/ ( "* s c]ta9 z ! te/ ( "o's p]sonal relation to ! be/ p]sons4 ,! p]sonal attitude t[>d ,*ri/ is ! supreme te/4 ,9 receiv+ him1 9 becom+ 8 disciples 9 a complet] s5se ?an we own ourselves ! disciples ( any o!r1 we make ! supreme moral *oice ( our lives2 &1 if no m is true ?an has be5 already said1 we s accept z a matt] ( fact ! fulle/ hi/orical revelation ( ,god at ! same "t4 ,! e?ical & religi\s "h fall absolutely toge!r4 ,& all ! subsequ5t *oices ( our ,*ri/ian life1 if true to ,*ri/1 are necess>ily moral4 #b4 ,! ,div9e ,w ,felt 9 ! ,e?ical ,comm&4--,9 ! second place1 ! s5se ( ! pres5ce ( ,god1 ( ! div9e w laid ^u u1 if we h ! religi\s feel+ at all1 comes to u n[h]e 9 our common life s c]ta9ly & s p]si/5tly z 9 a s5se ( obligation :i* we _c %ake (f1 a s5se ( fac+ a cle> duty4 ,to run away f ?is1 we are made to feel1 is pla9ly to run away f ,god4 ,is ?is n a simply true int]pretation ( ! common consci\sness8 ,"h1 !n1 ! religi\s exp]i5ce is 9 ! v sph]e ( ! e?ical1 & id5tical ) x4 #c4 ,involv$ 9 ! ,nature ( ,god's ,gifts4--,aga91 ,god's gifts 9 religion are ( su* a k9d t !y simply _c be giv5 to ! unwill+ s\l2 j to receive !m1 !re=e1 implies will+ness to use !m2 & fai? becomes inevitably bo? a gift & an activity4 ,h[ev] "o names ,god's gifts 9 religion1 s long z ! relation is kept a spiritual "o at all1 receiv+ ! gift requires a real e?ical attitude 9 ! recipi5t4 ,a real =giv5ess1 = example1 involves p]sonal reconciliation1 re/or$ p]sonal relations2 & reconciliation is mutual4 ,"o _c1 !n1 be said 9 any true s5se to accept =giv5ess f ,god :o is n himself 9 an attitude ( reconciliation ) ,god1 ( h>mony ( w ) him4 ,9 ! same way1 peace ) ,god1 ! gift ( ! ,_s1 life1 ,god's own life1 _c be really giv5 to any man )\t an e?ical response on 8 "p 9 a def9ite attitude ( w4 ,any?+ arbitr>y "h is1 !re=e1 necess>ily %ut out4 ,god's gifts 9 religion are ( su* a k9d t !y simply _c be giv5 to ! unwill+ s\l4 ,!y are n ?+s to be me*anically p\r$ out on m54 ,we h no ne$1 consequ5tly1 to gu>d our religi\s /atem5ts 9 ?is respect4 ,we _c ev5 receive f ,god ! spiritual gifts ( ! religi\s relation )\t ! active w4 ,"h1 too1 religion is c]ta9ly e?ical4 #d4 ,communion ) ,god1 ?r\gh ,h>mony ) ,8 ,e?ical ,w4--,or1 "o may say1 desire = real communion ) ,god seeks ,god himself1 n ?+s1 or "s exp]i5ce m]ely4 ,b ! v c5t] ( p]sonality is ! w2 any g5u9e seek+ ( ,god himself1 !re=e1 to commune ) him1 requires unity ) 8 e?ical w4 ,! deepe/ religi\s motive is at ! same "t1 ?us1 an impulse to "*4 #e4 ,! ,vision ( ,god = ! ,pure 9 ,he>t4--,*ri/'s own /atem5t--,bless$ are ! pure 9 he>t2 = !y %all see ,god--sugge/s ano!r aspect ( ?is ess5tial unity ( ! religi\s & ! e?ical4 ,! connection 9 ! beatitude is no *ance "o4 ,! highe/ & complete/ revelation ( p]sonality1 human or div9e1 c be made only to ! rev]5t4 ,god reveals himself to ! rev]5t s\l1 & mo/ ( all to ! pure--to ^? s\ls t are rev]5t ( p]sonality ?r\gh\t & "u ! sev]e/ pressure4 ,!re=e1 ! pure 9 he>t %all see ,god4 ,! secret ( ! ,"l is ) !m t fe> him4#dd ,! vision ( ,god requires ! _s t is rev]5t ( p]sonality1 & ?is _s is ! abid+ s\rce ( ! f9e/ e?ical liv+4 #f4 ,%>+ ! ,life ( ,god4--,b p]haps ! cle>e/ & mo/ satisfactory putt+ ( ! relation is ?is4 ,! v mean+ ( religion is %>+ ! life ( ,god4 ,z soon1 n[1 z ,god is conceiv$ z ess5tially holy & lov+1 a ,god ( "*1 a liv+ w & n a sub/ance--& ,*ri/ianity to be true to itself1 mu/ always s conceive him--s soon religion & morality are indissolubly unit$4 ,god's life1 accord+ to ,*ri/'s tea*+1 is ! life ( con/ant & p]fect self-giv+4 ,to %>e ! life ( ,god1 !re=e1 to %>e 8 s+le purpose1 is to come into ! life ( lov+ s]vice4 ,! two fall toge!r f ! po9t ( view ( ! social consci\sness4 ,& we are sav$1 we come into ! real religi\s life1 only 9 ! proportion 9 :i* we h really le>n$ to love4 ,ev]yone t love? is begott5 ( ,god1 & kn[e? ,god4#de ,! old sep>ation ( religion & "* is impossible f ?is po9t ( view4 #g4 ,*ri/1 z ,satisfy+ ,our ,highe/ ,claims on ,life4--,b we may /ill pr(itably press ! "q3 ,is ! ,*ri/ian religion--! special fai? 9 ! revelation ( ,god 9 ,*ri/1 ! be/ way to righte\sness8 does x necess>ily1 mo/ naturally1 mo/ spontane\sly1 & mo/ joyfully c>ry righte\sness ( life ) x8 ,if ?is is to be true1 ,*ri/ian fai?1 9 ,h]rmann's language1 mu/ give m5 ! p[] to submit ) joy to ! claims ( duty4#df ,x may be d\bt$ :e!r any "o has dealt ) ?is "q z satisfactorily z ,h]rmann himself1 & a few s5t5ces may well be quot$ f 8 discussion4 ,we "k t ! ord9>y in/9ctive way 9 :i* m5 seek ! satisfaction ( all ! ne$s ( life makes x impossible to submit hone/ly to ! dem&s ( duty1 & we see1 also1 ! falsity ( ! *ildi% idea ( ! my/ics t ?is in/9ct %\ld be extirpat$2 x foll[s1 !n1 t we c only seek moral deliv]ance 9 a true & p]fect satisfaction ( our crav+ = life4444 ,n[ j su* a feel+ ( p]fect inn] cont5tm5t is possible to ! ,*ri/ian1 & he has x j 9 proportion z he und]/&s t ,god turns to him 9 ,*ri/4444 ,?is is r$emption1 t ,*ri/ creates )9 u a liv+ joy1 ^: brightness beams ev5 f ! eye ( sorr[1 & tells ! _w ( a p[] x _c compreh5d4 ,& ! p[] t works r$emption is ! fact t 9 our _w !re is a ,man ^: appe>ance c at any mom5t be to u ! mighty ,^w ( ,god1 snat*+ u out ( our tr\bles & mak+ u to feel t he desires to h u = 8 own1 & s sett+ u free f ! _w & f our own in/9ctive nature4#dg ,*ri/1 t is1 has no desire to )draw himself f ! te/ ( ! l>ge/ life4 ,he is able to satisfy ! highe/ dem&s = life4 ,he c\rts ! trial4 ,he claims to (f] life1 ! l>ge/ life4 ,i came1 he says1 t !y may h life1 & may h x abundantly4#dh ,8 way ( deliv]ance is n negative b positive1 n limit+ b fulfill+4 ,he is able to give su* l>g5ess ( life 9 himself1 su* inn] satisfaction ( ! crav+ = life1 z makes a l[] life lose its p[] ov] u1 ! l>g] & high] life driv+ out ! mean] & l[]4 ,?is is positive victory1 supplant+ ! l[] ) ! high]2 j z 9 lit]ature1 9 music1 9 fri5d%ip1 & 9 love1 we expect ! be/ to break d[n ! ta/e = ! l[]4 #h4 ,! ,vision ( ! ,ri*es ( ! ,life ( ,*ri/1 ,e?ically ,condition$4--,b ! ?\ght ( ,*ri/'s satisfy+ our highe/ claim on life des]ves to be c>ri$ fur!r1 if x is to be sav$ f vagu5ess & to h its full p[] ) u4 ,! highe/ value 9 ! _w is a p]sonal life4 ,s ,*ri/ has made u feel4 ,x is f9ally ! only value1 = all o!r s-call$ values borr[ _! value f p]sons4 ,! highe/ joy conceivable is ent]+ into ! ri*es ( ano!r's p]sonal life ?r\gh 8 will+ self-revelation4 ,n[ x is no f9e fancy t ! supremely ri* life ( ! _w's hi/ory is ,*ri/'s4 ,god c only be kn[n1 if we are n to fall back into ! vag>ies ( my/icism1 9 8 concrete manife/ation2 & ,god op5s out 9 ,*ri/1 ! ,new ,te/am5t believes1 ! inexhau/ible weal? ( 8 own p]sonal life4 ,x is ,god's highe/ gift1 ! gift ( himself4 ,no "o kn[e? ! ,son save ! ,fa!r2 nei!r do? any "k ! ,fa!r1 save ! ,son1 & he to :om ! ,son wille? to reveal him4#di ,?is is life et]nal1 t !y %\ld "k !e1 ! only true ,god1 & him :om ?\ did/ s5d4#ej ,s x seem$ to ,paul3 ,unto me1 :o am less ?an ! lea/ ( all sa9ts1 0 ?is grace giv51 to prea* unto ! ,g5tiles ! unse>*able ri*es ( ,*ri/4#ea ,d we n "h cat* a glimpse ( :at ! dep? ( t satisfaction ) ! inn] life ( ,god 9 ,*ri/ may be8 ,= ,he :o ha? ! he>t ( ,god suffic$1 ,c satisfy all he>ts1--yea1 ?9e & m9e4 ,only ! ri*es ( a p]sonal life c satisfy our claim on life1 our desire = life2 &1 ultimately1 we c be fully satisfi$ only ) ,god's own life 9 ! fulle/ revelation he c make ( x to u m54 ,only ?is c be ! unspeakable gift4 ,! ?ir/ = ,god1 = ! liv+ ,god1 is a simply true expression ( ! human he>t :5 x comes to real self-k4 ,b ! ri*es ( ! p]sonal life ( ,*ri/ are necess>ily hidd5 to "o :o does n come into ! %>+ ( ,*ri/'s purpose4 ,! condition ( ! vision is e?ical4 ,! v satisfaction1 !re=e1 ( our crav+ = life con/antly impels to a m p]fect union ) ! w ( ,*ri/2 = su* complete ent]+ into ! life ( ano!r ) joy implies pr(\nd agreem5t4 ,! desire = life1 !re=e1 = ,god's own life1 = communion ) ,god1 itself impels to "*4 ,fai? does "h give ! p[] to submit ) joy to ! claims ( duty1 & religion is e?ical 9 ! v he>t ( x4 #i4 ,! ,moral ,law1 z a ,revelation ( ! ,love ( ,god4--,! same unity ( ! religi\s & e?ical life is helpfully se51 if we put ! matt] 9 "o fur!r & slightly diff]5t way4 ,only ! ,*ri/ian religion1 fai? 9 ,god z ,fa!r reveal$ 9 ,*ri/1 enables u to welcome ! /]n dem&s ( duty & s gives u inn] deliv]ance1 joy1 & lib]ty 9 ! moral life2 = n[ ! moral dem& is se51 n z task only1 b z opportunity4 ,= ,*ri/1 ! law ( ,god is a revelation ( ! love ( ,god2 x is a graci\s indication--a secret :isp]$ to u--( ! l9es along :i* we are to f9d our l>ge/ & ri*e/ life2 x is n a limitation ( life1 b a way to l>g] life4 ,n1 !n1 ! avoidance1 z f> z possible1 ( ! law ( ,god1 b ! complete/ fulfilm5t ( x is ! road to life--foll[+ ! h9t ( ! law into ! remote/ ramifications1 & into ! inmo/ _s1 ( ! life4 ,! o!r attitude :i* assumes t ! law is a h9drance to life is a di/9ct d5ial ( ! love ( ,god4 ,x implies t ,god lays ^u u dem&s :i* are n = our good4 ,x refuses to accept z reality ,*ri/'s manife/ation ( ,god z ,fa!r4 ,real belief 9 ! love ( ,god1 on ! o!r h&1 mu/ take ! fe>ful out ( 8 comm&s4 ,to be fre$ f ! law1 n[1 has q a diff]5t mean+3 n ! tak+ (f f u ( ! moral dem&1 b ! inn] deliv]ance1 t w\ld n h ! comm& remov$1 b f9ds life 9 x1 & obeys x freely & joyfully4 ,only a ?or\ghgo+ & fundam5tal fai? 9 ! ,fa!rhood ( ,god c br+ su* inn] deliv]ance1 ev5 z we h se5 t only su* a fai? c really gr\nd ! social consci\sness4 ,& su* a fai? only ,*ri/ has prov$ adequate to br+4 ,) ?is light1 n[1 we feel1 9 e dem& ( duty1 ! pres5ce ( ,god1 & 9 ?is pres5ce ( ,god ! pl$ge ( life1 n a limitation ( life4 ,! religi\s life desires ,god1 & x f9ds ,god nev] s c]ta9ly z 9 ! purpose fully to face duty4 ,e "o ( ! relations ( life is1 ?us1 turn$ to ) joy by ! religi\s man1 z sure to be a fur!r *annel ( ! revelation ( ,god4 ,! ?ir/ = ,god drives to ! fai?ful fulfilm5t ( ! human relation4 ,religion becomes joyfully e?ical4 ,nor is !re any possibility ( ab&onm5t to ! w ( ,god 9 g5]al1 z ! my/ic seems (t5 to feel4 ,god's w means p>ticul>s all along ! way ( our life2 & !re is no communion ) ,god except 9 ?is e?ical w 9 p>ticul>s4 ,at no po9t1 !re=e1 c ! religi\s life )draw itself f ! daily duty & ma9ta9 its own exi/5ce4 ,! con/ant inevitable condition ( ! religi\s communion is ! e?ical w4 ,our provid5tial place is ,god's place to f9d u4 ,:]e ,god has put u1 j !re he w be/ f9d u4 ,?is is fur!r se5 9 ! fact t ! true ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce is a con/ant p>adox3 ,god ev] satisfy+1 & yet ev] impell+--nev] all[+ u to rema9 :]e we are1 b hold+ up to u ! always high] ideal beyond2 ! law is ev]1 ,( 8 fulness we all receiv$1 & grace 9 place ( grace4#eb ,! deep5+ communion ) ,god is only ?r\gh a con/antly deep5+ moral life4 ,su* a ?or\ghgo+ e?iciz+ ( religion z ! social consci\sness dem&s1 we ne$ n hesitate1 !re=e1 to believe is possible4 ,! tru] religion is to its own great aspiration aft] ,god1 ! m c]ta9ly is x e?ical4 ,b ! social consci\sness1 s f> z x influ5ces religion1 n only t5ds to draw away f ! falsely my/ical1 & to emphasize ! p]sonal & ! e?ical1 x also t5ds to emphasize 9 religion ! concretely1 hi/orically ,*ri/ian4 #dc ,cf4 ,am]ican ,j\rnal ( ,!ology1 ,oct41 #ahih1 p4 #hbd4 #dd ,psalm #be3ad4 #de ,i ,john #d3g4 #df ,! ,communion ( ! ,*ri/ian ) ,god1 p4 #bcj4 #dg ,op4 cit41 pp4 #bcb-bcd4 #dh ,john #aj3aj4 #di ,matt4 #aa3bg4 #ej ,john #ag3c4 #ea ,eph4 #c3h4 #eb ,john #a3af4 ,cf4 ,h]rmann1 ,op4 cit41 pp4 #ib1 #ic4 ,,*apt] ,,viii ,,! ,,emphasis ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,^u ,,! ,,hi/orically ,,*ri/ian ,,9 ,,religion ,! fact t ! social consci\sness t5ds to emphasize 9 religion ! concretely hi/orically ,*ri/ian1 has be5 s inevitably involv$ 9 ! prec$+ discussions1 t x c be treat$ v briefly4 ,i4 ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,ne$s ,,hi/orical ,,ju/ification ,! ju/ification ( ! social consci\sness1 we h se51#ec mu/ be prem95tly f hi/ory4 ,nei!r nature nor speculation c satisfy x4 ,x ne$s to be able to believe 9 a liv+ ,god :o is 9 liv+ relation to liv+ m54 ,x ne$s j su* a ju/ification z hi/orical ,*ri/ianity1 & only hi/orical ,*ri/ianity1 c give2 x ne$s ! assurance ( an objective div9e w 9 ! _w1 def9itely work+ 9 ! l9e ( its own ideals4 ,x ne$s also to be able to give su* def9ite cont5t to ! ?\ght ( ,god z %all be able to satisfy its own /rong insi/5ce ^u ! rational & ! e?ical z hi/orical4 ,,ii4 ,,*ri/ianity',s ,,response ,,to ,,?is ,,ne$ ,if religion is to be a reality to ! social consci\sness1 !n1 !re mu/ be a real revelation ( a real ,god 9 ! real _w1 9 actual human hi/ory1 n an imag9>y ,god1 nor a dream ,god1 nor a ,god ( my/ic contemplation4 ,?is disc]nm5t ( ,god 9 ! real _w1 9 actual hi/ory1 is ! glory ev5 ( ! ,old ,te/am5t2 & x came1 z we h se51 along ! l9e ( ! social consci\sness4 ,& x is su* a real revelation ( ! real ,god t ,*ri/ianity f9ds prem95tly 9 ,*ri/4 ,x c say to ! social consci\sness3 ,make no ef=t to believe1 b simply put y\rself 9 ! pres5ce ( a concrete1 def9ite1 actual1 hi/orical fact1 ) its p]5nial e?ical appeal2 put y\rself 9 ! pres5ce ( ,*ri/--! greate/ & reale/ ( ! facts ( hi/ory1--& let t fact make its own legitimate impression1 "w its own natural "w2 t fact alone1 ( all ! facts ( hi/ory1 gives y full & ample w>rant = y\r own be+4 ,if ?is be true1 x c h>dly be d\bt$ t1 s f> z ! social consci\sness und]/&s itself & influ5ces religion at all1 x w t5d to emphasize1 n to und]e/imate1 ! concretely1 hi/orically ,*ri/ian4 ,! natural influ5ce ( ! social consci\sness ^u religion1 !n1 may be said to be f\rfold3 x t5ds to draw away f ! falsely my/ical2 x t5ds to emphasize ! p]sonal 9 religion1 & s to keep ! truly my/ical2 x t5ds to emphasize ! e?ical 9 religion2 & x ne$s ! concretely1 hi/orically ,*ri/ian4 #ec ,cf above1 pp4 #ei ff4 ,,! ,,influ5ce ,,( ,,! ,,social ,,consci\sness ,,^u ,,!ological ,,doctr9e ,,*apt] ,,ix ,,g5]al ,,results ,! "q ( ?is ?ird division ( our inquiry is ?is3 ,to :at *ang$ po9ts ( view1 & to :at re/atem5ts ( doctr9e1 & s to :at bett] appreciation ( ,*ri/ian tru?1 does ! social consci\sness ( our "t lead8 ,! "q is rais$ "h1 z 9 ! case ( ! conception ( religion1 n z "o ( exact hi/orical connection1 b r z a "q ( sympa!tic po9ts ( contact4 ,x means simply3 ,) :at *anges 9 !ological /atem5ts w\ld ! social consci\sness naturally f9d itself mo/ sympa!tic8 ,c]ta9 g5]al results are cle> f ! />t1 & might be anticipat$ f any "o ( sev]al po9ts ( view4 ,i4 ,,! ,,conception ,,( ,,!ology ,,9 ,,p]sonal ,,t]ms ,9 ! fir/ place1 ! social consci\sness means1 we h f\nd1 emphasis on ! fully p]sonal--a fre% awak5+ to ! significance ( ! p]son & ( p]sonal relations4 ,its :ole activity is 9 ! sph]e ( p]sonal relations4 ,h5ce1 z 9 ! conception ( religion1 s "h1 s f> z ! social consci\sness affects !ology at all1 x w t5d ev]y:]e to br+ ! p]sonal into prom95ce1 & x c]ta9ly w be f\nd 9 h>mony ultimately ) ! attempt to conceive !ology 9 t]ms ( p]sonal relations4 ,^! are = ! social consci\sness ! reale/ ( realities2 & if !ology is to be real to ! social consci\sness1 !n x mu/ make mu* ( ! p]sonal4 ,!ology1 ?us1 x is wor? :ile see+1 is n to be p]sonal & social1 b x w be social--x w d ju/ice to ! social consci\sness--if x does ju/ice to ! fully p]sonal2 =1 9 ! language ( ano!r1 man is social1 j 9 s f> z he is p]sonal4#ed ,! =eign & unreal seem+ ( _m ( ! old =ms ( /atem5t1 x may well be not$ 9 pass+1 has its probable cause j "h4 ,!y 7 n %ap$ 9 ! atmosph]e ( ! social consci\sness4 ,!y got at ?+s 9 a way we %\ld n n[ ?9k ( us+4 ,! me?od ( approa* 0 too m]ely metaphysical & individuali/ic & my/ical1 & ! result seems to u to h b slight e?ical or religi\s significance4 ,! argum5ts t n[ move u mo/1 9 ?is entire realm ( spiritual inquiry1 are moral & social r ?an metaphysical & my/ical4 ,x is int]e/+ to see1 = example1 h[ su* argum5ts = immortality z t ( ! simplicity ( ! s\l's be+--& mo/ ( ^? us$ by ,plato--& h[ su* argum5ts ev5 = ! exi/5ce ( ,god z ^? ( ,samuel ,cl>ke f "t & space1 h become = u m]ely matt]s ( curi\s inquiry4 ,we c h>dly imag9e m5 hav+ giv5 !m real weight4 ,a simil> *ange seems to be creep+ ov] ! labori\s attempts metaphysically to conceive ! div9ity ( ,*ri/4 ,! "q is %ift+ its position = bo? radical & cons]vative to a new gr\nd--f ! metaphysical & my/ical to ! moral & social2 ?\gh "s radicals :o reg>d !mselves z 9 ! van ( progress h n yet f\nd x out1 & s f9d fault ) "o = n cont9ually def9+ himself 9 t]ms ( ! old] metaphysical =mulas & %ibbole?s4 ,! consid]ations1 9 all ^! que/ions & 9 _m o!rs1 :i* really weigh mo/ ) u n[1 are consid]ations :i* belong to ! sph]e ( ! p]sonal spiritual life4 ,ultimately1 no d\bt1 a metaphysics is involv$ "h too2 b x is a metaphysics ^: f9al reality is _s1 n an unkn[n sub/ance--,locke's some?+1 ,i "k n :at4 ,! unsatisfactor9ess ( ev5 s honor$ a symbol z ! ,apo/les' ,cre$1 z a p]man5tly adequate /atem5t ( ,*ri/ian fai?1 mu/ = simil> reasons become increas+ly cle> 9 ! atmosph]e ( ! social consci\sness4 ,"o wond]s1 z he goes c>efully ov] x1 t s _m concrete /atem5ts c\ld be made conc]n+ ! ,*ri/ian religion1 :i* yet are s little e?ical4 ,! cre$ seems almo/ to exclude ! e?ical4 ,x has no?+ to say1 except by r di/ant implication1 ( ! "* ( ,god1 ( ! "* ( ,*ri/1 or ( ! "* ( m54 ,! life ( ,*ri/ betwe5 8 bir? & 8 dea? are unt\*$4 ,! consid]ations t really weigh mo/ ) u--z !y did ) ! apo/les--9 mak+ u ,*ri/ians1 c]ta9ly d n come "h to prom95t expression4 ,?is :ole diff]5ce ( atmosph]e is ! /rik+ fact2 & 7 x n t we in/9ctively int]pret its phrases 9 accordance ) our mod]n consci\sness1 we %\ld feel ! diff]5ce mu* m ?an we d4 ,:at ! previ\s discussion has call$ ! truly my/ical--! recognition ( ! :ole man1 ( ! entire p]sonality--is com+ 9 increas+ly to correct bo? ! falsely my/ical & ! falsely metaphysical4 ,we are argu+ n[1 9 h>mony ) ! social consci\sness1 f ! /&po9t ( ! broadly rational1 n f t ( ! n>r[ly intellectual4 ,,ii4 ,,! ,,fa!rhood ,,( ,,god1 ,,z ,,! ,,det]m9+ ,,pr9ciple ,,9 ,,!ology ,"o might rea* ess5tially ! same g5]al results f ! influ5ce ( ! social consci\sness1 by see+ t1 s f> z x deep5s = u ! mean+ ( ! p]sonal1 x w deep5 imm$iately our conception ( ! ,fa!rhood ( ,god--! c5tral & dom9at+ doctr9e 9 all !ology--& s affect all !ology4 ,=1 ) a *ange 9 ! conception ( ,god1 no doctr9e c g :olly unt\*$4 ,e /ep into a deep] feel+ = ! p]sonal--& ! gr[? ( ! mod]n social consci\sness is und\bt$ly a long /ep 9 t direction--deep5s necess>ily religion & !ology4 ,p]haps ! possible results "h c be illu/rat$ 9 no way bett] ?an by recall+ ,patt]son ,du,bois' putt+ ( ! ne$$ *ange 9 ! conception ( ! prop] attitude ( a fa!r t[>d 8 *ild4 ,we are n to say1 he writes3 ,i w conqu] t *ild1 no matt] :at x may co/ him1 b we are to say1 ,i w help t *ild to conqu] himself1 no matt] :at x may co/ me4 ,n[ t *ange 9 po9t ( view is a well-nigh p]fect illu/ration ( ! social consci\sness 9 a giv5 relation1 & x _c be d\bt$ t x is a true expression ( ,*ri/'s ?\ght ( ! ,fa!rhood ( ,god2 b has x really dom9at$ ?r\gh & ?r\gh our !ological /atem5ts8 ,manife/ly1 :at x means to u t ,god is ,fa!r dep5ds on :at we h come to see 9 fa!rhood4 ,& ,pr9cipal ,fairbairn1 9 ! second "p ( 8 ,! ,place ( ,*ri/ 9 ,mod]n ,!ology1 has giv5 u a good illu/ration ( h[ mu* x means = !ology to be 9 e>ne/ 9 mak+ ! ,fa!rhood ( ,god ! det]m9+ doctr9e 9 !ology4 ,,iii4 ,,*ri/',s ,,own ,,social ,,emphases ,aga91 if ! g5]al influ5ce ( ! social consci\sness ^u !ological doctr9e is to be recogniz$ at all1 x is evid5t t a ,*ri/ian !ology mu/ take full acc\nt ( ,*ri/'s own social emphases4 ,by loyalty to ^!1 x w expect be/ to meet ! ne$ ( an enlight5$ social consci\sness4 ,x w /rive ?us--to use ,pr(essor ,peabody's in/ructive summ>y ( ! social pr9ciples ( ! tea*+ ( ,jesus--to be true to ! view f above1 ! approa* f )91 & ! movem5t t[>d a spiritual end2 wisdom1 p]sonality1 idealism2 a social horizon1 a social p[]1 a social aim4 ,! supreme tru? t ?is is ,god's _w gave to ,jesus 8 _s ( social optimism2 ! assurance t man is ,god's in/rum5t gave to him 8 me?od ( social opportunism2 ! fai? t 9 ,god's _w ,god's p are to e/abli% ,god's k+dom gave him 8 social idealism4 ,he looks ^u ! /ruggl+1 *aotic1 s9n+ _w ) ! eye ( an uncl\d$ religi\s fai?1 & disc]ns 9 x ! pr9ciple ( p]sonality fulfill+ ! w ( ,god 9 social s]vice4#ee ,& e "o ( ^! ?ree great social pr9ciples ( ,jesus has obvi\s !ological applications1 n yet fully made4 ,! social consci\sness1 inde$1 well illu/rates ,fairbairn's admirable /atem5t ( h[ progress is to be expect$ 9 !ology4 ,! long] ! hi/ory ( ,*ri/1 he says1 lives 9 ! ,*ri/ian consci\sness & p5etrates x1 ! m does ! consci\sness become able to int]pret ! hi/ory 9 its own t]ms & accord+ to its own cont5ts4 ,! old pagan m9d into :i* ,*ri/ianity fir/ came c\ld n possibly be ! be/ int]pret] ( ,*ri/ianity1 & ! m ! m9d is cleans$ ( ! pagan ! m qualifi$ x becomes to int]pret ! religion4 ,x is1 !re=e1 reasonable to expect t ! lat] =ms ( fai? %\ld be ! tru] & pur]4#ef ,n[ ! social consci\sness itself is a g5u9e manife/ation ( ! _s ( ,*ri/ at "w 9 ! _w1 & ! m9d p]meat$ ) ?is social consci\sness is consequ5tly bett] able to turn back to ! tea*+ ( ,jesus & give x prop] int]pretation4 ,,iv4 ,,! ,,reflection ,,9 ,,!ology ,,( ,,! ,,*anges ,,9 ,,! ,,conception ,,( ,,religion ,once m1 !ology1 z an expression ( religion1 w at once reflect any *ange 9 ! conception ( religion4 ,! influ5ce ( ! social consci\sness ^u religion1 already trac$1 w1 !re=e1 inevitably pass ov] into !ology4 ,?is means no?+ less ?an a *ang$ po9t ( view1 9 ! consid]ation ( ea* doctr9e4 ,= !ology mu/ !n recognize cle>ly t x c build on no falsely my/ical conception ( communion ) ,god2 b1 :ile keep+ ! elem5ts 9 my/icism :i* are ju/ifi$ by ! social consci\sness1 x w require ( itself ?r\gh\t a =mulation ( doctr9e 9 t]ms t %all be ?or\ghly p]sonal1 ?or\ghly e?ical1 & indubitably loyal to ! concretely hi/orically ,*ri/ian4 ,_m traditional /atem5ts q fail to meet s se>*+ a te/2 b no l[] /&>d c give a !ology t %\ld fully meet ! dem&s ( ! social consci\sness4 ,! g5]al results ( ! influ5ce ( ! social consci\sness ^u !ological doctr9e1 !n1 may be said to include3 ,! emphasis ^u ! fully p]sonal1 & s conceiv+ !ology 9 t]ms ( p]sonal relation2 ! deep5+ ( ! conception ( ! ,fa!rhood ( ,god1 & mak+ ?is ! det]m9+ pr9ciple 9 !ology2 ! application ( ! social pr9ciples ( ! tea*+ ( ,jesus to !ology2 ! reflection 9 !ology ( ! natural *anges 9 ! conception ( religion wr\ght by ! social consci\sness4 ,n[ any "o ( ^! g5]al results indicates ! c]ta9 influ5ce ( ! social consci\sness ^u !ology1 & any "o might be foll[$ out into helpful sugge/ions = ! re/atem5t ( !ological doctr9es4 ,b we %all probably mo/ cle>ly & def9itely answ] ! "q ( our !me1 if we ask specifically conc]n+ ! sev]al elem5ts ( ! social consci\sness3 ,h[ does a deep5+ s5se ( ! l-m9d$ness ( m51 ( ! mutual influ5ce ( m51 ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son1 ( p]sonal obligation1 & ( love1 t5d to affect our !ological po9t ( view & mode ( /atem5t8 ,& our inquiry w foll[ ^! sep>ate que/ions 9 sep>ate *apt]s1 except t = ! purposes ( !ological inf]5ce1 ! la/ ?ree may be appropriately gr\p$ toge!r4 #ed ,na%1 ,e?ics & ,revelation1 p4 #bei4 #ee ,peabody1 ,jesus ,*ri/ & ! ,social ,"q1 p4 #ajd4 #ef ,fairbairn1 ,! ,place ( ,*ri/ 9 ,mod]n ,!ology1 p4 #ahf4 ,,*apt] ,x ,,! ,,influ5ce ,,( ,,! ,,deep5+ ,,s5se ,,( ,,! ,,l-,,m9d$ness ,,( ,,m5 ,,^u ,,!ology ,9 def9itely consid]+ ! influ5ce ( ! social consci\sness ^u !ological doctr9es1 our fir/ "q becomes3 ,h[ does ! deep5+ s5se ( ! l-m9d$ness ( m5 affect !ology8 ,obvi\sly1 "h1 ! *ange w be l>gely "o ( mood4 ,we %all look at our !mes ) a diff]5t feel+1 & s speak diff]5tly1 modify+ our me?ods ( putt+ ?+s 9 ^? slight ways t d n seem specially significant to "o :o judges 9 ! mass1 b mean v mu* to "o :o feels ! f9] implications ( p]sonal life4 ,^! f9] *anges no "o c hope to foll[ out 9 detail4 ,c]ta9 ( ^! f9] *anges w naturally f9d incid5tal expression 9 ! c\rse ( ! m =mal treatm5t4 ,b our att5tion mu/ be ma9ly giv5 to ! /atem5t ( "s ( ! mo/ important ( ! pla9] results ( ! pr9ciple 9 !ology4 ,i4 ,,no ,,prime ,,favorites ,,) ,,god ,9 ! fir/ place1 ?is conviction ( ! l-m9d$ness ( m5 means t !re c be no prime favorites ) ,god4 ,x c h>dly help affect+ ! ?\ght ( election4 ,election w1 inde$1 be ?\ght ( z qualifi$ by ! "* ( ! *os52 = ev5 ,paul's argum5t 9 ,romans cle>ly recognizes ?is1 & is1 9 fact1 itself a di/9ct argum5t aga9/ a n>r[ doctr9e ( election1 z o!rs h recogniz$4#eg ,b1 beyond ?is1 ! conviction ( ! l-m9d$ness ( m5 w especially view election z a *oice = s]vice4 ,! div9e me?od ( election mu/ be 9 h>mony ) ,*ri/'s fundam5tal pr9ciple ( 8 k+dom1 & ) ! develop+ social consci\sness3 ,:osoev] %all be fir/ among y1 %all be s]vant ( all4#eh ,x is no accid5t t ?is ?\ght ( election z *oice = prem95t s]vice1 :i* is inde$ s\ndly biblical1 has come into special prom95ce 9 ^! days ( ! social consci\sness4 ,! same *ange is pass+ ov] our view ( ! elect1 z ( ! privileg$ & gov]n+ classes4 ,we %all n return to ! old] feel+ ( prime favorites ( ,god1 & ! problem ( evil w f9d h]e9 a c]ta9 alleviation4 ,we %all feel increas+ly t ea* race & ea* individual h _! call+ & h _! comp5sat+ advantages2 & t1 :5 x comes d[n to ! f9al te/ ( opportunity1 ! diff]5ces 9 opportunity betwe5 individuals are f> less ?an !y seem2 = to ea* "o is giv5 ! possibility ( ! l>ge/ s]vice any man c r5d]--! possibility ( t\*+ closely ) ! v _s ( 8 life a few o!r lives4 ,!re are comp5sations1 z ,james says1 & no outw>d *anges ( condition 9 life c keep ! night+ale ( its et]nal mean+ f s++ 9 all sorts ( diff]5t m5's he>ts4#ei ,,ii4 ,,! ,,great ,,univ]sal ,,qualities ,,& ,,int]e/s1 ,,! ,,mo/ ,,valuable ,moreov]1 s9ce equality ( ne$ among m51#fj implies1 z we h se51 a common capacity--ev5 if 9 v>y+ degrees--( ent]+ into ! mo/ fundam5tal int]e/s ( life1 ?is belief 9 ! ess5tial lik5ess ( m5 is likely to c>ry ) x t mo/ :olesome conviction = !ology1 t ! great univ]sal qualities & int]e/s are ! mo/ valuable4 ,n t :i* di/+ui%es u f "o ano!r1 b t :i* we h 9 common is mo/ valuable4 ,z ,h[ells tells ! boys 9 8 ,a ,boy's ,t[n1 ! fir/ ?+ y h to le>n "h bel[1 is t 9 ess5tials y are j l e "o else1 & t y are diff]5t f o!rs only 9 :at is n s mu* wor? :ile4#fa ,?is consid]ation is no small help 9 fac+ t mo/ difficult problem = any ideal view ( ! _w--! problem ( evil4 ,9 ,god's _w1 we feel t ! mo/ common ?+s ought to be ! be/4 ,& ?is gr[+ conviction ( ! social consci\sness comes 9 to confirm our fai?4 ,! con/ant & simple insi/5ce ( ,*ri/ on receptivity z a fundam5tal quality 9 8 k+dom is built1 9 fact1 on an optimi/ic fai? 9 ! value ( ! common ?+s4 ,x is int]e/+ to notice ! v>i$ confirmations ( ! value ( ! common4 ,h[ (t5 we h to feel t ! deepe/ discussions come out ) only deep] insight into ! great common tru?s2 &1 on ! o!r h&1 t 9 /ilt$ philosophiz+1 :at seems at fir/ sight a great discov]y1 proves only a p]v]sely obscure way ( putt+ a common tru?4 ,x is ! v mission ( g5ius--( ! poet 9 ! l>g] s5se1 we are com+ to feel1 to br+ out ! value ( ! common4 ,8 di/9ctive m>k is t he has kept a fre% s5se = ! great common exp]i5ces ( life4 ,s ,kipl+ prays3 ,x is en\gh t ?r\gh ,?y grace ,i saw naught common on ,?y e>?4 ,take n t vision f my k54 ,s1 ! greate/ 9 art1 ,hegel cont5ds1 has a univ]sal appeal4 ,x is a :olesome & he>t5+ conviction1 ,i say1 to br+ into !ology1 t ! really be/ ?+s are common1 accessible to all1 actually %>$ 91 to an ext5t beyond t :i* our sup]ficial vision seems to %[4 ,=1 aft] all1 ?is conviction ( ! social consci\sness is only br++ home to u1 9 a new & appreciable way1 ,*ri/'s own optimism & 8 own fai? 9 ! love ( ! ,fa!r4 ,x is only ano!r illu/ration ( ,fairbairn's pr9ciple ( ! ,*ri/ian consci\sness becom+ m ,*ri/ian1 & s bett] able to und]/& & int]pret ,*ri/4 ,& x leads u back by ?is r\te ( ! social consci\sness1 to emphasize 9 life1 & 9 our !ological ?9k+ ^u ! conditions ( ent]+ ! k+dom ( ,god1 ,*ri/'s own insi/5ce ^u ! two univ]sally human *>act]i/ics f\nd 9 e *ild--susceptibility & tru/1 :i*1 volunt>ily *]i%$1 become tea*abl5ess & belief 9 love4 ,if ,god is ,fa!r inde$1 & we are int5d$ to come to our be/ 9 association ) him1 ^! qualities mu/ be ! mo/ fundam5tal ones4 ,& !y imply no lack ( virility1 ei!r1 = ! highe/ self-ass]tion1 z ,pr(essor ,ev]ett po9t$ out 9 8 criticism ( ,nietzs*e1 is 9 complete self-surr5d] to su* a w z ,god's4 ,:5 ,jesus said1 ',he t lose? 8 life %all save x1' he said 9 effect--,! self-surr5d] to :i* ,i call y is ! true/ self-ass]tion4 ,we f9d ?us 9 ! tea*+s ( ,*ri/ianity a summons to /r5g? f> great] ?an t impli$ by ! self-ass]tion :i* is mo/ *>act]i/ic ( ! tea*+s ( ,nietzs*e1 because x is ! ass]tion ( a l>g] self4#fb ,our outlook becomes well-nigh hopeless1 :5 we make our te/s ( admission to ! k+dom s mu* m exclusive ?an ,*ri/ himself made !m4 ,,iii4 ,,ess5tial ,,lik5ess ,,"u ,,v ,,div]se ,,=ms ,x is p>ticul>ly important = !ology t ?is conviction ( ! l-m9d$ness ( m5 has come f a gr[+ p[] to disc]n ess5tial lik5ess "u v div]se =ms2 = ?is consid]ation be>s n only on ! problem ( natural evil1 b also on ! problem ( s9 & ( ! progress ( ,*ri/ianity4 ,we h tak5 "s curi\sly div]se pa?s to ?is und]/&+ ( div]se lives4 ,travels1 hi/ory1 biography1 autobiographical fragm5ts1 an?ropology1 sociology1 psy*ology1 &--to no small degree--fiction1 ) its /ories ( out-(-!-way places & out-(-!-way peoples & ( unfamili> classes1--all h be5 ?or\ghf>es = ! social consci\sness "h4 ,we are sl[ly le>n+ to see ! lik5ess "u ! diff]5ces1 & s to transc5d ! diff]5ces ev5 betwe5 occid5tal & ori5tal4 ,all ?is means mu*1 n only = our practical mission>y putt+ ( ! tru?1 b also = our f9al !ological /atem5ts4 ,!y w inevitably gr[ simpl]1 l>g]1 m univ]sally human1 & at ! same "t m deep & solid4 ,we are sl[ly le>n+1 too1 to disc]n a deep inn] cont5t ( life "u conditions t h no appeal = u1 & to see l ideals & aspirations "u v div]se =ms ( expression4 ,take1 = example1 ^! ?ree or f\r s5t5ces--a small "p ( t quot$ by ,pr(essor ,james 9 8 essay1 ,on a ,c]ta9 ,bl9dness 9 ,human ,be+s1--f ,/ev5son's ,lant]n-,be>]s3 ,x is said t a poet has di$ "y 9 ! brea/ ( ! mo/ /olid4 ,x may be cont5d$ r t a 7some:at m9or7 b>d 9 almo/ e case survives1 & is ! spice ( life to 8 possessor4 ,ju/ice is n done to ! v]satility & ! unplumb$ *ildi%ness ( man's imag9ation4 ,8 life f )\t may seem b a rude m\nd ( mud2 !re w be "s gold5 *amb] at ! he>t ( x 9 :i* he dwells delight$4#fc ,&1 lat]1 on ! side ( ideals1 ,/ev5son is quot$ once aga93 ,if ,i c\ld %[ y ^! m5 & wom5 all ! _w ov]1 9 e /age ( hi/ory1 "u e abuse ( error1 "u e circum/ance ( failure1 )\t hope1 )\t help1 )\t ?anks1 /ill obscurely fight+ ! lo/ fight ( virtue1 /ill cl++ to "s rag ( honor1 ! poor jewel ( _! s\ls6#fd ,& n[1 hav+ quot$ ,h[ells & ,/ev5son z !ological au?orities1 ,i %all be p>don$ if1 = a mom5t1 ,i erect ,k5ne? ,grahame's ,gold5 ,age into a !ological in/itute3 ,see1 said my fri5d1 be>+ some:at on my %\ld]1 h[ ?is /range ?+1 ?is love ( ours1 lives & %9es out 9 ! unlikelie/ ( places6 ,y h be5 9 ! fields 9 e>ly morn+8 ,b>r5 acres1 all6 ,b only /oop--cat* ! light ?w>twise--& all is a silv] network ( gossam]6 ,s ! fairy filam5ts ( ?is /range ?+ und]run & l9k toge!r ! :ole _w4 ,yet x is n ! old imp]i\s god ( ! fatal b[--h]s hanikate ma*an--n t--nor ev5 ! placid respectable /org--b some?+ /ill unnam$1 p]haps m my/]i\s1 m div9e6 ,only "o mu/ /oop to see x1 old fell[1 "o mu/ /oop6#fe ,x means v mu* = ! sanity ( our outlook on life1 & = any possible !odicy1 t we c believe ! he>t ( su* a view z ?is = :i* ,/ev5son & ,grahame are "h cont5d+4 ,& :at is all ?is attempt to get away f ?is c]ta9 bl9dness 9 human be+s1 ( :i* ,pr(essor ,james speaks1 b a gr[+ into "o ( ! fix$ habits ( ,jesus1 :at ,phillips ,brooks calls 8 discov]y ( int]e/ 9 p :om ! _w g5]ally w\ld h f\nd mo/ un9t]e/+8 ,& ?is same habit1 he adds1 pass+ ov] into 8 disciples1 made ! wide & democratic "* ( ! new fai?4#ff ,,iv4 ,,z ,,appli$ ,,to ,,! ,,"q ,,( ,,immortality ,x may probably be safely said t ?is /eadily gr[+ conviction ( ! social consci\sness1 ( ! ess5tial lik5ess ( all m51 :i* is daily confirm$ afre%1 & ! m confirm$ ! m c>eful ! /udy1 is n likely to take k9dly to ! idea--:i* comes into a "p ( ,dr4 ,mc,connell's argum5t conc]n+ immortality1 9 8 int]e/+ book1 ,! ,evolution ( ,immortality--t liv+ creatures class$ z m5 on physical gr\nds are n1 !re=e1 to be s class$ on psy*ical gr\nds4#fg ,! consid]ations & illu/rations br\ght =w>d by ,dr4 ,mc,connell1 9 connection ) ?is proposition1 ,i _c ?9k w\ld seem at all conclusive to ei!r ! tra9$ psy*ologi/ or sociologi/4 ,x is exactly ! l-m9d$ness ( m5 :i* ! social consci\sness affirms1 & x has n come ha/ily to its conclusion4 ,x w n quickly surr5d] t conclusion4 ,!re is an evolution ( immortality1 & x has be5 age-long1 b x is pre-human4 ,! belief 9 immortality s f> z x does n re/ purely on ! "q ( ! moral quality ( a giv5 human life 7:]e ! hypo!sis ( immortability may prop]ly en\gh come 97 is gr\nd$ ^u *>act]i/ics--l t ( ! possibility ( absolutely indef9ite progress#fh--:i* 9 sob] sci5tific inquiry _c safely be d5i$ to any man1 & mu/ be d5i$ to all creatures bel[ man4 ,9 any case1 ! new !ory ( immortability1 s f> z x is bas$ ^u ! proposition "h consid]$1 has its battle to fight out ) ?is e/abli%$ conviction ( ! social consci\sness ( ! ess5tial l-m9d$ness ( all m54 ,!re are v>i\s consid]ations1 n all ( !m :olly cr$itable1 :i* w lead _m to turn a will+ e> to ?is new prophesy+2 b1 ?\gh x makes mu* ( evolution1 x seems to me to h ! :ole tr5d ( ! social evolution aga9/ x1 & to give ! lie to t pati5t sympa!tic insight into ! lives ( o!r classes & peoples1 :i* is "o ( ! f9e/ products ( ! e?ical evolution ( ! race4 ,if "o is tempt$ to believe t a good l>ge %>e ( ! human race are really brutes 9 human semblance1--& our selfi%ness & pride & impati5ce & unlov+ lack ( insight & desire to dom9ate may naturally tempt 9 ?is direction1--let him read t *apt] ( ,pr(essor ,james to :i* ref]5ce has already be5 made1 ,on a ,c]ta9 ,bl9dness 9 ,human ,be+s1 & its p5dant1 ,:at ,makes a ,life ,significant4 ,x may help 8 !ology4 ,let him recall ! words ( ,phillips ,brooks conc]n+ ?is /range hopelessness ab\t ! _w1 jo9$ to a /rong hope = !mselves1 :i* we see 9 _m good religi\s p4 ,9 _! he>ts !y recognize indubitably t ,god is sav+ !m1 :ile ! aspect ( ! _w ar\nd !m seems to %[ !m t ! _w is go+ to p]dition4 ,?is is a common en\gh condition ( m9d2 b ,i ?9k x may be surely said t x is n a good1 nor c x be a p]man5t1 condition4 ,god has m]cifully made u s t no man c con/antly & purely believe 9 any great privilege = himself unless he believes 9 at lea/ ! possibility ( ! same privilege = o!r m54#fi ,v4 ,,consequ5t ,,l>g] ,,sympa?y ,,) ,,m51 ,,fai? ,,9 ,,m51 ,,& ,,hope ,,= ,,m5 ,?is :ole conviction ( ! social consci\sness1 ( ! l-m9d$ness ( m51 leads naturally to increas$ sympa?y ) m51 & ?is 9 turn to /ill bett] disc]nm5t ( moral & spiritual realities4 ,& ?is is ( prime importance = ! !ologian2 = sympa!tic insight1 x mu/ nev] be =gott51 is ! true r\te to spiritual v]ities4 ,s f> z our insight into actual human life becomes tru]1 s f> our !ology becomes cle>] & m reasonable4 ,?is conviction leads also to increas$ belief 9 m51 & consequ5tly to increas$ belief 9 ! effectiv5ess ( ! high] appeals4 ,! temptation to disbelief 9 man 0 "o ( ! und]ly+ temptations ( ,*ri/ z he look$ =w>d to 8 "w2 b he turn$ resolutely f x1 & refus$ to build 8 k+dom on any l[] appeal t impli$ a lack ( fai? 9 m54 ,no?+ seems to me m wond]ful 9 ,*ri/ ?an 8 m>vel\s fai? 9 man2 =1 ?\gh he has ! deepe/ s5se ( ! s9 ( m51 !re is n ! slighte/ trace ( cynicism 9 8 ?\ght or life4 ,?is recognition ( lik5ess "u div]sity1 too1 leads to increas$ hope = m51 "h & h]eaft]4 ,9 ,james' words3 ,x absolutely =bids u to be =w>d 9 pron\nc+ on ! mean+lessness ( =ms ( exi/5ce o!r ?an our own4444 ,nei!r ! :ole ( tru? nor ! :ole ( good is reveal$ to any s+le obs]v]4444 ,no "o has insight into all ! ideals4 ,no "o %\ld presume to judge !m (f-h&4#gj ,?is ?\ght helps u to great] hope = m51 because1 inde$1 x helps u to ! disc]nm5t ( g5u9e ideals "u v diff]5t =ms ( life1 ( ! univ]sal s5se ( duty & "s loyalty to x1 ?\gh !re is great div]sity ( judgm5t z to :at is duty4#ga ,b1 x is "h to be not$1 also1 t ! ?\ght ( ! l-m9d$ness ( m5 br+s great] hope1 because x helps to ! disc]nm5t ( lik5ess1 ev5 "u diff]5ce 9 important t]ms us$4 ,we are com+ to see t !re is sometimes1 at lea/1 a really /rong religi\s fai? :]e m5 d n ackn[l$ge ! t]m4 ,?us1 ,bradley says3 ,all ( u1 ,i presume1 m or less1 are l$ beyond ! region ( ord9>y facts4 ,"s 9 "o way1 & "s 9 o!rs1 we seem to t\* & h communion ) :at is beyond ! visible _w4 ,9 v>i\s mann]s we f9d some?+ high]1 :i* supports & humbles1 bo? *a/5s & transports u4 ,&1 z a philosoph] he adds1 ) c]ta9 p]sons1 ! intellectual ef=t to und]/& ! univ]se is a pr9cipal way ( ?us exp]i5c+ ! ,deity4#gb ,ev5 :]e ! t]m ,deity w\ld be entirely abjur$1 we h se5 ) ,pauls51#gc t a real fai? ess5tially religi\s 9 "* may be cle>ly manife/4 ,we are ev5 com+ to see t m5 may seem to !mselves to be cont5d+ ^u opposite sides ( s fundam5tal a "q z t ( ! p]sonality ( ,god1 & yet be ne> toge!r z to _! own ultimate fai? & attitude1 & possibly ev5 z to _! real philosophical views ( ,god2 b ! same t]m has come to h su* diff]5t connotations = ! m51 f _! diff]5t education & exp]i5ce1 t !y simply _c use x ) ! same mean+4 ,i h n ! slighte/ desire to r$uce ! concrete1 e?ical1 def9itely p]sonal religion ( ,jesus to ! ambiguities ( philosophical dream]s2 ! _w is go+ to become m & m consci\sly & av[$ly ,*ri/ian4 ,b ,i d n1 on ! o!r h&1 z a ,*ri/ian !ologian1 wi% to %ut my eyes to great ess5tial lik5esses 9 fundam5tal fai?s & ideals & aspirations1 because !y are clo!d 9 diff]5t g>b4 ,! life & tea*+ ( ,jesus h work$ & are work+ 9 ! consci\sness ( m5 f> beyond ! limits our feeble fai? is incl9$ to prescribe4 ,!re is d\btless mu* unconsci\s ,*ri/ianity1 mu* unconsci\s foll[+ ( ,*ri/4#gd ,& we are only foll[+ ,*ri/'s own c\nsel1 :5 we refuse to =bid ! man :o is work+ a good "w 9 8 "n1 ?\gh he foll[s n ) u4#ge ,c]ta9ly1 if we accept ! witness ( a man's life aga9/ ! witness ( 8 lips :5 ! witness ( 8 lips is "r1 we ought to accept ! witness ( 8 life aga9/ ! witness ( 8 lips :5 ! witness ( 8 lips is wrong4 ,) ref]5ce to all ! prec$+ inf]5ces f ! deep5+ s5se ( ! l-m9d$ness ( m51 x is p>ticul>ly wor?y ( note1 t ?is conviction ( ! ess5tial lik5ess ( m5 has come into exi/5ce side by side ) ! gr[+ conviction ( ! moral unrip5ess ( _m m51 & 9 spite ( t conviction4 ,! c>eful /udy ( diff]5t social classes is =c+ ^u bo? ! sci5tific sociologi/ & ! practical social work]1 ! s5se ( ! e?ical immaturity ( m54 ,b deep] ?an ?is recognition ( moral unrip5ess1 deep] ?an ! vision ( ! sad defectiv5ess ( moral & spiritual ideals & /&>ds1 deep] ?an ! cle> s5se ( ! imm5se diff]5ces among m5 z to :at is duty1 deep] ?an ! diff]5ces 9 ev5 ! mo/ important t]ms us$1 lies ?is great conviction ( lik5ess--t all m5 are moral & spiritual be+s1 made = relation to "o ano!r & to ,god2 t !y h ideals t h a wide outlook implicit 9 !m1 & h "s loyalty to ^! ideals2 t !y d h a s5se ( obligation2 t ! moral & spiritual life is a reality1 a great univ]sal human fact4 ,,vi4 ,,judgm5t ,,accord+ ,,to ,,light1 ,,& ,,! ,,moral ,,reality ,,( ,,! ,,future ,,life ,x is no accid5t1 n[1 t accompany+ ?is d\ble social conviction1 !re has come into !ology a new insi/5ce ^u ! pr9ciple ( judgm5t ( a man accord+ to 8 light1 & consequ5tly also1 :at ,pr(essor ,cl>ke calls a t5d5cy t[>d ! recognition ( great] reality & fre$om 9 ! o!r life1 & ?us t[>d ! possibility ( moral *ange4#gf ,our conception ( ! future life 0 c]ta9 to be modifi$ by ! social consci\sness2 & x may be d\bt$ if any influ5ce ( ! social consci\sness ^u !ology c be m cle>ly trac$ hi/orically ?an ?is4 ,! motives t h be5 work+ 9 our m9ds "h include1 on ! "o h&1 a :olesome s5se ( ! imp]fection ( ev5 ! be/ human lives2 a glad disc]nm5t1 on ! o!r h&1 ( ! pres5ce ( g5u9e ideals 9 lives :]e we _h ?\ght !re 7 none2 ! c]ta9ty t1 z ,dr4 ,cl>ke says1 = at lea/ "o-?ird ( mank9d ! entire life ( consci\s & develop$ p]sonality is liv$ 9 ! o!r _w2#gg an exp]i5c$ unwill+ness to say1 :]e we _c see1 ! precise po9t at :i* ! v div]se lives ( m5 "u v div]se conditions come to full moral maturity2 & ! conviction t a life t is to be moral at all mu/ be moral ev]y:]e & ?r\gh all "t1 & t :]e ev5 we c see a little1 ,god c see mu* m4 ,all ^! motives1 n[1 make u refuse1 ) ,*ri/1 to answ] ! "q1 ,are !re few t be sav$8 ,& bo? ) increas+ hope1 & ) t increas+ s5se ( ! s]i\sness & significance ( life :i* s *>act]izes ! social consci\sness1 to urge3 ,/rive to ent] 94 ,! gr[+ s5se ( ! lik5ess ( m5 does affect our ?\ght ( ! future life4 ,! be/ m51 "u ! cle>e/ light1 h only begun2 = ! be/1 !re is /ill mu* ne$ ( gr[?4 ,:o has n begun at all8 ,= :om is !re no gr[?8 ,let u make no mi/ake "h4 ,x is no light-he>t$ indiff]5ce to "*1 to :i* ! g5u9e social consci\sness leads4 ,no age1 inde$1 ev] saw s cle>ly z ours t ! mo/ ess5tial conditions ( happ9ess are 9 "*1 or 0 m c]ta9 t s9 c>ries ) x its own inevitable consequ5ces4 ,x is n a less1 b a m1 pr(\nd s5se ( ! s]i\sness ( ! problem ( moral "*1 t makes u hesitate to dogmatize conc]n+ ! future life4 ,to br+ toge!r1 n[1 ! conclusions ( ! *apt]3 ,! fir/ elem5t 9 ! social consci\sness--! deep5+ s5se ( ! lik5ess ( m5--seems likely to affect !ology1 especially by modify+ ! ?\ght ( election ?r\gh emphasis ^u *oice = s]vice1 & ?r\gh ! cle> recognition t !re are no prime favorites ) ,god2 by /r5g!n+ ! conviction t ! great common qualities & int]e/s are ! mo/ valuable1 & t g5u9e & l>gely common ideals may be f\nd "u v div]se =ms & conditions2 & ?us1 on ! "o h&1 by oppos+ ! d5ial ( ! psy*ical lik5ess ( m51 z appli$ to ! problem ( immortality1 &1 on ! o!r h&1 by br++ u to l>g] sympa?y ) m51 to l>g] fai? 9 m51 & to l>g] hope = m52 &1 f9ally1 by lay+ new emphasis ^u judgm5t accord+ to light1 & ^u ! moral reality & fre$om ( ! future life4 #eg ,cf4 e4 g41 ,cl>ke1 ,outl9e ( ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 p4 #ade4 #eh ,m>k #aj3dd4 #ei ,james1 ,talks on ,psy*ology & ,life's ,ideals1 p4 #cja4 #fj ,cf4 ,gidd+s1 ,elem5ts ( ,sociology1 p4 #cbd4 #fa ,h[ells1 ,a ,boy's ,t[n1 p4 #bje4 #fb ,! ,new ,_w1 ,dec41 #ahih1 pp4 #gjb1 #gjc4 #fc ,james1 ,talks on ,psy*ology & ,life's ,ideals1 p4 #bcg4 #fd ,op4 cit41 p4 #bhb4 #fe ,p4 #aab4 #ff ,brooks1 ,! ,influ5ce ( ,jesus1 p4 #bec4 #fg ,mc,connell1 ,! ,evolution ( ,immortality1 pp4 #ge ff4 #fh ,cf4 ,james1 ,psy*ology1 ,vol4 ,,ii1 pp4 #cdh ff41 p4 #cfg2 ,lotze1 ,! ,microcosmus1 ,book ,v1 especially ,vol4 ,i1 pp4 #gac1 #gad4 #fi ,! ,c&le ( ! ,"l1 & ,o!r ,s]mons1 p4 #aed4 #gj ,talks on ,psy*ology & ,life's ,ideals1 pp4 #bfc1 #bfe4 #ga ,cf4 above1 p4 #aba ff4 #gb ,bradley1 ,appe>ance & ,reality1 pp4 #e1 #f4 #gc ,cf4 above1 pp4 #df1 #dg4 #gd ,cf4 ,fremantle1 ,! ,_w z ! ,subject ( ,r$emption1 pp4 #bej ff1 #cbj ff2 ,lyman ,abbott1 ,! ,outlook1 ,dec4 #bd1 #ahih4 #ge ,m>k #i3ch1 #ci2 ,cf4 ,matt4 #aj3dj-db4 #gf ,an ,outl9e ( ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 p4 #dge4 #gg ,op4 cit41 p4 #dfi4 ,,*apt] ,,xi ,,! ,,influ5ce ,,( ,,! ,,deep5+ ,,s5se ,,( ,,! ,,mutual ,,influ5ce ,,( ,,m5 ,,^u ,,!ology ,f ?is fir/ elem5t ( ! social consci\sness1 we turn n[ to ! second1 & ask1 ,h[ does ! deep5+ s5se ( ! mutual influ5ce ( m5 affect !ology8 ,i4 ,,! ,,real ,,unity ,,( ,,! ,,race #a4 ,fir/1 !n1 tak5 ) ! s5se ( ! lik5ess ( m51 x c h>dly be d\bt$ t sociology's /rong feel+ ( ! mutual influ5ce ( m5 deep5s = !ology ! ?\ght ( ! real1 n ! me*anical1 unity ( ! race4 ,! !ologian believes1 m ?an he did1 9 a race ^: unity is prem95tly moral1 r ?an physical or my/ical4 ,! truly sci5tific position = ! !ologian seems to be1 to make no my/]i\s assumptions1 :]e well-kn[n causes are suffici5t to acc\nt = ! facts2 & ^? causes :i* ! social consci\sness cle>ly sees to be at "w seem1 9 all probability1 adequate to acc\nt = ! facts 9 discussion s f> z ^? facts are f9ite at all4#gh ,! !ologian kn[s1 !n1 a true moral univ]se1 ) a unity :i* is t ( ! close p]sonal1 mutual relations ( l-m9d$ spiritual be+s4 ,! natural goal ( su* a race1 ! only "o 9 :i* !y c truly f9d !mselves1 is ! k+dom ( ,god4 ,?is conception ( ,*ri/ is fir/ ?or\ghly at home ) u1 :5 we see t ! true unity ( ! race is t ( p]sonal moral relation4 ,s f> z m5 turn f t goal1 ?is same racial unity ( ! inevitable & mo/ intimate p]sonal relations conv]ts !m into some?+ approa*+ ,rits*l's conception ( an oppos+ k+dom ( s94 ,are we prep>$ to be ?or\ghly loyal to j ?is conception ( ! unity ( ! race ?r\gh\t our !ological ?9k+2 & s to give up *]i%$ ideas ( common1 transmitt$1 inh]it$1 or racial s9 or righte\sness1 ( my/ical solid>ity1 & racial ideal repres5tation1 etc48 ,x probably may be said ) tru? t few1 if any1 !ological sy/ems h be5 ?us loyal4 ,inde$1 "u :at seems a mi/ak5 application ( ! social consci\sness1 & p>ticul>ly "u ! mislead+ influ5ce ( ! analogy ( ! organism1 m5 h believ$ !mselves atta9+ a deep] !ological view1 :5 !y h1 9 fact1 turn$ away f ! sob] tea*+ ( ! social consci\sness4 ,x may n be 9 va9 = our !ology to he> & receive ) pati5ce a sociologi/'s def9ition ( ! social m9d4 ,^u ?is po9t ,pr(essor ,gidd+s says explicitly3 ,!re is no reason to suppose t society is a great be+ :i* is consci\s ( itself ?r\gh "s my/]i\s process ( ?9k+1 sep>ate & di/9ct f ! ?9k+ t goes on 9 ! bra9s ( individual m54 ,at any rate1 !re is no possible way yet kn[n to man ( prov+ t !re is any su* supreme social consci\sness4 ,nev]!less1 he adds3 ,to ! gr\p ( facts t may be describ$ z ! simultane\s l-m5tal-activity ( two or m individuals 9 communication ) "o ano!r1 or z a conc]t ( ! emotions1 ?\ght1 & w ( two or m communicat+ individuals1 we give ! "n1 ! social m9d4 ,?is "n1 accord+ly1 %\ld be reg>d$ z mean+ j ?is gr\p ( facts & no?+ m4 ,x does n mean t !re is any o!r consci\sness ?an t ( individual m9ds4 ,x does mean t individual m9ds act simultane\sly 9 l ways & cont9ually influ5ce "o ano!r2 & t c]ta9 m5tal products result f su* comb9$ m5tal action :i* c\ld n result f ! ?9k+ ( an individual :o _h no communication ) fell[-be+s4#gi ,j s f>1 x may well be suppos$1 & no f>!r may we g1 9 !ology1 9 moral & spiritual inf]5ces f ! unity ( ! race4 ,we are memb]s "o ( ano!r = good & = ill1 "o 9 ! unity ( ! inevitable1 mutual influ5ce ( l-m9d$ p]sons4 ,,ii4 ,,deep5+ ,,! ,,s5se ,,( ,,s9 ,& ?is conviction1 9 ! second place1 n only deep5s our s5se ( ! real unity ( ! race1 x deep5s also ! s5se ( s94 ,& we c h>dly sep>ate "h ! influ5ce ( ! ?ird elem5t ( ! social consci\sness--! s5se ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son4 ,z aga9/ a r wide-spread & (t5 express$ contr>y feel+1 ?is deep5+ s5se ( s9 may yet1 x is believ$1 be tru?fully ma9ta9$1 s f> z ! social consci\sness is really mak+ itself felt4 ,!re are "s dis9tegrat+ t5d5cies "h1 no d\bt1 l ! t5d5cy "u "s applications ( evolution & evolution>y philosophy to turn all s9 into a necess>y /age 9 ! evolution4 ,b _h n ,drummond reason to say3 ,!re is "o !ological ^w :i* has f\nd its way lately into ne>ly all ! new] & f9] lit]ature ( our c\ntry4 ,x is n only "o ( ! words ( ! lit]>y _w at pres5t1 x is p]haps ! ^w4 ,its reality1 its c]ta9 influ5ce1 its univ]sality1 h at la/ be5 recogniz$1 & 9 spite ( its !ological "n h =c$ x into a place :i* no?+ b its felt relation to ! wid] !ology ( human life c\ld ev] h e>n$ = a religi\s ^w4 ,t ^w1 x ne$ sc>cely be said1 is s94#hj ,contra/ ?is mod]n s5se ( s9 ) ! almo/ total lack ( x among ev5 s gift$ a p ( ! anci5t _w z ! ,greeks1 & feel ! significance ( ! ph5om5on4 ,b x is p>ticul>ly to be not$ t ?is s5se ( s9 9 lit]ature is l>gely due to a ke5] social consci5ce4 ,9 fact1 if ! social consci\sness is n a ?or\ghly fraudul5t ph5om5on1 x c\ld h>dly be o!rwise2 = ! social consci\sness1 9 its v ess5ce1 is a s5se ( :at is due a p]son2 & s9 is always ultimately aga9/ a p]son1 failure to be :at "o ought to be 9 "s p]sonal relation1 includ+ f9ally all ! relations ( ! k+dom ( ,god4 ,we simply _c deep5 ! s5se ( ! mean+ & value ( p]sonal relations1 & n deep51 at ! same "t1 ! s5se ( s94 ,! mean+ ( ! ,gold5 ,rule1 & s ! s5se ( s9 "u x1 deep5s inevitably ) e /ep into ! mean+ ( ! p]son4 ,if ! "o great comm&m5t is love1 !n ! s9 ( :i* m5 ne$ mo/ ( all to be convict$ is lack ( love4 ,! self-torm5t+ & fanciful s9s ( "s ( our devotional books v likely are less felt4 ,b ! v exi/5ce ( ! social consci\sness seems to be pro( t !re nev] 0 s mu* good1 hone/1 :olesome s5se ( real s9 z to-day--su* s9 z ,*ri/ himself recognizes 9 8 own judgm5t te/4 ,x may be t1 9 tempor>y absorption 9 ! human relations1 ! relation ( all ?is to ! ,all-,fa!r may seem =gott52 ev5 s1 we may well rememb] ,*ri/'s ,ye did x unto me4 ,b1 9 fact1 we mu/ g mu* f>!r & say1 ,! social consci\sness c only be true to itself f9ally1 z x goes on to see its acts 9 ! light1 mo/ ( all1 ( t s+le1 p]sonal relation :i* und]lies all o!rs4 ,we h already se5 t ! social consci\sness requires = its own ju/ification its gr\nd+ 9 ! manife/ tr5d ( ! liv+ w ( ,god4 ,) ?is felt id5tification ( ! w ( ,god ) love = m51 m5 c /ill less %ake (f easily ! conviction ( s94 ,probably1 mo/ religi\s m5 argue a dim9i%+ s5se ( s91 because !y feel t less is made ( ^? consequ5ces ( s9 :i* h be5 usually connect$ ) ! future life4 ,!re may be real dang] "h f %all[ ?9k+2 b "h1 too1 ! social consci\sness has only to be true to itself to be sav$ f any %all[ e/imate ( ! consequ5ces ( s9 "h or h]eaft]4 ,z ! s9 itself is always1 f9ally1 9 p]sonal relations1 s ! mo/ t]rible results ( s91 9 ?is life & 9 all lives1 are 9 p]sonal relations4 ,:at x co/s ! man himself 9 cutt+ him (f f ! relations 9 :i* all l>g5ess ( life consi/s1 :at x co/s ^? :o love him1 :at x co/s ,god1--?is alone is ! true measure ( s94 ,s judg$1 s9 itself is fe>$ z nev] be=e4 ,surely1 ,pr9cipal ,fairbairn is "r 9 say+3 ,& s ev5 )9 ,*ri/5dom1 s9 is nev] s little fe>$ z :5 hell mo/ dom9ates ! imag9ation2 x ne$s to be look$ at z x affects ,god1 to be und]/ood & fe>$4#ha ,b x is ! inevitable result ( ! social consci\sness to br+ u to ! deepe/ conviction ( all ^! p]sonal relations1 & s to ! deepe/ conviction ( s94 ,ano!r consid]ation des]ves att5tion4 ,we h a gr[+ conviction t our social ideal is p]sonally realiz$ only 9 ,*ri/1 & we h giv5 unequal$ att5tion to t life & h su* k ( x1 9 its detail$ applications1 z no prec$+ g5]ation has ev] _h4 ,?is simply means t we h bo? su* a s5se ( our moral call+1 & are face to face ) su* a liv+ /&>d1 z mu/ /eadily deep5 9 u a g5u9e s5se ( real s91 9 our fall+ s f> %ort ( ! _s ( ,*ri/4 ,!ology ne$s1 fur!r1 to make unmi/akably cle>1 & to use ! fact1 t ?is mutual influ5ce ( m5 holds = good z well z = evil2 t few great] lies h ev] be5 told1 ?an ! ins9uation t only evil is contagi\s1 ! good n4 ,& ?is conviction ( ! contagion ( ! good1 ( mutual influ5ce = good1 conc]ns !ology p>ticul>ly 9 ?ree ways1 all ( :i* may be reg>d$ simply z illu/rations or aspects ( ! "o k+dom ( ,god4 ,we are memb]s "o ( ano!r 7#a7 9 atta9m5t ( "*1 7#b7 9 p]sonal relation to ,god1 & 7#c7 9 confession ( fai?4 ,& ea* ( ^! =ms ( mutual influ5ce w ne$ c>eful att5tion4 ,9 consid]+ sep>ately "h atta9m5t ( "* & relation to ,god1 x is n meant = a mom5t to admit t sep>ation ( e?ics & religion :i* has be5 already d5i$1 b only to s+le out = di/9ct treatm5t ! "o mo/ important & fundam5tal relation ( life--relation to ,god4 ,we are c]ta9ly nev] to =get t ! indisp5sable condition ( "r relations to ,god1 is t a man %\ld h be5 won into will+ness to %>e ,god's own righte\s purpose conc]n+ m54 ,,iii4 ,,mutual ,,influ5ce ,,= ,,good ,,9 ,,! ,,atta9m5t ,,( ,,"* ,we "k no deep] law 9 ! build+ ( "*1 ?an t righte\s "* comes ?r\gh t association ) ! be/ 9 :i* !re is mutual self-giv+4 ,! problem ( "* implies n only a b>e recognition ( a man's moral fre$om1 b a sacr$ respect at e po9t = 8 p]sonality4 ,if a man is ev] to h "* at all1 x mu/ be absolutely 8 own2 he mu/ be won freely into x4 ,9 ?is free w9n+ to "*1 no association c\nts = its mo/ t is n mutual4 ,i become 9 "* mo/ c]ta9ly & rapidly l t man ) :om ,i con/antly am1 to ^: influ5ce ,i mo/ fully surr5d]1 & :o gives himself mo/ completely to me4 ,we may analyze ! ph5om5on psy*ologically1 z1 inde$1 we h already done 9 %[+ t a true p]sonal relation to ,*ri/ necess>ily c>ries ) x a true e?ical life4 ,& t :i* held true = religion _c be false = !ology1 we may be sure4 ,b1 9 any case1 we always come back f9ally to ! fact1 t "* is truly & inevitably contagi\s 9 an association 9 :i* !re is mutual surr5d]4 ,"* is caught1 n taught4 ,! inn] /r5g? ( ano!r life to :i* we surr5d] is1 z ,phillips ,brooks some:]e says1 directly transmissible4 ,i suspect t ! ultimate psy*ological pr9ciple at "w "h is t ( ! impulsiv5ess ( consci\sness4 ,b1 :e!r t be true or n1 ! witness to ?is contagion is wide-spread among /ud5ts ( m54 ,! greate/ gift ! h]o leaves 8 race1 "o ( our great noveli/s says1 is to h be5 a h]o4 ,9 almo/ id5tical language1 a great e?ical & philosophical writ] adds3 ,! noble/ work]s ( our _w bequea? u no?+ s great z ! image ( !mselves4 ,_! task1 be x ev] s glori\s1 is hi/orical & transi5t1 ! maje/y ( _! _s is ess5tial & et]nal4 ,b "o might /ill ?9k1 "h1 only ( an example4 ,! o!r life1 h[ev]1 mu/ be m to me ?an m]e example4 ,= ! highe/ atta9m5t 9 "* ,i ne$ ! association ( "s highe/ "o1 :o w give himself to me unres]v$ly4 ,r$emption to real righte\sness ( life _c be )\t co/ to ! r$eem]4 ,& x is a psy*ologi/1 fac+ ! ultimate problem ( w-/r5g!n+1 :o urges 9 words t might seem almo/ to look to ,*ri/3 ,! prophet has drunk m deeply ?an any "o ( ! cup ( bitt]ness2 b 8 c\nt5ance is s un%ak51 & he speaks su* mighty words ( *e]1 t 8 w becomes our w1 & our life is k9dl$ at 8 own4#hb ,x is ! "o great c]ta9 road to "*--z x is to appreciation ( e value--to /ay 9 ! pres5ce ( ! be/1 9 self-surr5d] to x4 ,no wond] ,*ri/ said1 ,i am ! ,way4 #a4 ,! ,application to ! ,problem ( ,r$emption4--,x is h>dly possible to ignore ?is "o great kn[n law ( "*-mak+1 :i* ! social consci\sness s presses ^u u1 9 any ?9k+ t is = a mom5t wor? :ile conc]n+ our r$emption by ,*ri/4 ,& :atev] our po9t ( view1 ?is consid]ation ought to h weight ) u4 ,nay1 mu/ we n make x necess>ily ! v c5t] ( all our ?\ght "h8 ,= all ! realities 9 ?is problem ( r$eem+ a man f s9 to righte\sness are int5sely p]sonal1 e?ical1 spiritual4 ,n[1 are we to rea* a deep] view ( r$emption1 by turn+ away f ! deepe/ e?ical fact to ! une?ical8 ,d we s gr\nd our view ! m securely8 ,is !re some?+ holi] ?an ! holy e?ical w se5 realiz$ 9 ,*ri/'s life & dea?8 ,=1 if x is ! w 9 8 dea? by :i* we are sanctifi$1#hc !re c be no %>p sep>ation ( ! life & dea?4 ,mu/ we n r expect t ! cle>e/ light1 on ! holie/ 9 ,god & our p]sonal relation to him1 w be ?r[n by ! holie/ we "k 9 life1 9 our human p]sonal relations8 ,is n ! precise me?od ( r$emption1 !n1 to no small degree1 cle>$ = u "r "h1 9 ?is conviction ( ! social consci\sness ( ! contagion ( ! good 9 a self-surr5d]+ association--! only solid>ity ( :i* we c be c]ta98 ,*ri/ saves u1 9 ! only c]ta9 way we "k t any man is ev] sav$ to bett] liv+1 ?r\gh direct contagion ( "*1 ?r\gh 8 imm$iate influ5ce ^u u4 ,! p[] ( ! influ5ce ( a r$eem+ p]son mu/ dep5d ^u two facts3 ! ri*ness ( ! self t is giv51 & ! dep? ( ! giv+4 ,! supremely r$eem+ p[] mu/ be ! giv+ ( ! ri*e/ self1 unto ! utt]mo/4 ,god has n yet done 8 be/ = m51 until he gives himself 9 ! fulle/ manife/ation :i* c be made ?r\gh man to m51 & gives to ! utt]mo/1 ) no draw+ back f any co/4 ,is x n because1 aft] all1 back ( all !ories & ev5 9 spite ( !ories1 m5 h se5 9 ! life & dea? ( ,*ri/ j ?is et]nal giv+ ( ,god himself1 t !y h be5 caught up into "s %>+ ( ! same _s1 & s felt work+ directly & imm$iately ^u !m ! supreme/ r$eem+ p[] ! _w kn[s8 ,! cross ( ,*ri/ has be5 ,god's n only say+1 ,i w help t *ild to conqu] himself1 :atev] x co/s me1 b ,god do+ x1 & p]petually do+ x4 ,n less ?an t mu/ be ! co/ ( a man's r$emption4 ,"* is directly transmissible 9 an association 9 :i* !re is mutual self-giv+4 ,x is mo/ easily s transmissible1 only at its highe/1 9 its mo/ p]fect manife/ation1 9 its complete/ self-giv+ at any co/4 ,! self-giv+ on ! "p ( "o try+ to w9 ano!r into "* mu/ prec$e ! self-giv+ ( ! s9n]2 = ! s9n]'s own will+ness to yield himself to ! influ5ce ( ! "* ( ! o!r mu/ fir/ ( all be won4 ,?is initial w9n+ ( ! cop]ative w ( ! o!r is ! he>t ( ! :ole battle4 ,& "h ! p[] reli$ on is n only ! unconsci\s contagion & imitation ( "* t enli/s a man's int]e/ almo/ by surprise1 b also ! mightie/ influ5ce m5 "k 9 break+ d[n ! resi/+ w & w9n+ m5 consci\sly & ) f9al ab&on--! influ5ce ( a pati5t1 long-suff]+1 p]si/5t1 self-sacrific+ love t _c give ! s9n+ "o up4 ,mo/ c]ta9ly1 !n1 r$emption _c be )\t co/ to ! r$eem] ( m5--n only t co/ to ! h]o ( ! sup]ior %[+ ( sup]ior "* 9 a sup]ior task1 b t o!r co/1 indissolubly l9k$ inde$ ) ?is1 ( rev]5tly1 pati5tly1 to ! bitt] end1 help+ ano!r to conqu] himself--! inevitable suff]+ ( all r$emptive endeavor = ^? :om "o loves4 ,?is involves 7#a7 suff]+ 9 contact ) s91 7#b7 suff]+ 9 ! rejection by ^? s9n+1 & mo/ ( all1 7#c7 suff]+ 9 ! s9 itself ( ^? "o loves because "o loves !m--suff]+ :i* is ! m int5se1 ! m "o loves4 #b4 ,! ,consequ5t ,e?ical & ,spiritual ,mean+ ( ,sub/itution & ,propitiation4--,c we g yet a /ep f>!r "h8 ,x may be fairly tak5 = grant$ t :]e ! *ur* has /rongly & p]si/5tly /ood = c]ta9 modes ( putt+ a doctr9e--?\gh ! precise putt+ may be un=tunate--t 9 all probability !re is !re "s real & important tru? aft] :i* ! consci\sness ( ! *ur* is dimly feel+4 ,/>t+1 n[1 f ?is same great law ( ! contagion ( "* & ! inevitable influ5ce ( an association 9 :i* !re is mutual self-giv+1 is x n possible to %[ t !re is a /rict e?ical & spiritual s5se t we c und]/&1 9 :i* ,*ri/'s suff]+ may be truly call$ vic>i\s1 & himself a sub/itute = u1 & a propitiation8 ,x is1 ( c\rse1 n = a mom5t =gott5 t1 9 ,dr4 ,cl>ke's language1 a ,god :o w himself provide a propitiation has no ne$ ( "o 9 ! s5se :i* ! ^w has ord9>ily borne4 ,"s ri*] & nobl] mean+ mu/ be pres5t if ! ^w is appropriate to ! case4#hd ,b x is n likely t a purely e?ical & spiritual view ( ! atonem5t1 :i* sees ! problem z a /rictly p]sonal "o--& ?is seems to ! writ] ! only true position--c ev] succe$ 9 ! he>ts ( ! great body ( ! memb]%ip ( ! *ur*es1 if x _c %[1 at ! same "t1 t x is able 9 "s real way to take up into itself ^! ?\ghts ( sub/itution & propitiation4 ,! writ] f9ds mu* ( ! old language ab\t ! atonem5t z (f5sive to 8 moral s5se z any man well c4 ,b t !re is an absolutely univ]sal human ne$ = some?+ l t to :i* ! old language ( sub/itution & propitiation look$1 he _c d\bt4 ,x seems to %[ itself 9 ?is1 t no man ) real moral s5se1 probably1 c>es to put himself at ! end ( 8 life1 say1 9 ! attitude ( ! ,ph>isee r ?an 9 t ( ! ,publican4 ,if "o sets aside all spectacul> elem5ts 9 ! judgm5t1 & ev5 d5ies altoge!r any great s+le f9al assize = all m51 /ill he _c avoid ! ?\ght ( "s judgm5t ^u 8 life4 ,z ,dr4 ,cl>ke says aga93 ,we are n our own ma/]s 9 go+ out ( ?is _w2 we g we "k n :i!r4 ,yet our go+ is n )\t its j & holy me?od4 ,our place & lot 9 ! life t is beyond mu/ be det]m9$ righte\sly1 9 accordance ) ! life t we h liv$ ?us f>1 t ! next /age 9 our exi/5ce may be :at x ought to be4#he ,h[ev]1 n[1 t judgm5t ( ,god may be express$1 no man c hope to face ! te/ propos$ by ,*ri/ 9 ! tw5ty-fif? ( ,mat!w1 /ill less ! te/ impli$ 9 ,*ri/'s own life1 & feel t he has already atta9$4 ,he kn[s himself to be at be/ only a faulty gr[+ *ild1 ) "s real _s ( ob$i5ce 9 8 he>t4 ,& x is p>ticul>ly to be not$1 t exactly t man mu/ /& mo/ def9itely = ! reality ( "s g5u9ely e?ical judgm5t1 :o has mo/ insi/$ ^u ! necess>ily e?ical "* ( ! religi\s life4 ,moreov]1 ! normal exp]i5ce ( ! deep5+ ,*ri/ian life is an increas+ s5se ( s94 ,^u ?is po9t1 too1 ! social consci\sness is witness4 ,:at1 n[1 makes x possible = a man to expect1 9 any s5se1 a favorable judgm5t ( ,god ^u 8 life8 ,if ,god makes any sep>ation ( m5 9 ! _w to come1 he c]ta9ly _c divide !m into p]fect & imp]fect m54 ,judg$ by any complete /&>d1 all are imp]fect4 ,or if1 )\t sep>ation1 ,god 9 any s5se1 9 ! mo/ inn] way1 passes judgm5t1 h[ does approval fall ^u any8 ,& ^u :om does x fall8 ,mu/ n e man :o wi%es to be cle> & hone/ ) himself fairly face ^! que/ions8 ,& ,*ri/'s own ?\ght ( ,god z ,fa!r mu/ be our key "h4 ,& ! matt] may well be c\nt$ wor? a m c>eful analysis ?an x (t5 gets4 ,h[ does a fa!r di/+ui% betwe5 :at he calls an ob$i5t & a disob$i5t *ild8 ,bo? are faulty4 ,h[ 9 any fair s5se may "o be call$ ob$i5t8 ,to ! e>?ly fa!r1 t *ild is call$ an ob$i5t *ild1 n :o is delib]ately sett+ 8 w aga9/ 8 fa!r's ) no int5tion to cop]ate ) ! fa!r's purpose = him1 b ^: loyal int5tion is to d ! fa!r's w1 really to cop]ate ) ! fa!r 9 ! fa!r's own purpose = ! *ild's life4 ,:51 n[1 ?is *ild is c>ri$ away by "s gu/ ( temptation & disobeys1 & !n returns 9 p5it5ce to ! fa!r1 evid5tly view+ ! s91 s f> z 8 exp]i5ce all[s1 z ! fa!r views x1 & he>tily putt+ x away1 ! fa!r1 ei!r ) or )\t p5alty1 re/ores ! *ild to full p]sonal relation to himself2 & t is ! vital po9t4 ,&1 ?\gh he nei!r judges ! pa/ life z )\t failure1 nor expects ! future to be )\t failure1 he approves ! *ild1 z 9 a true s5se ob$i5t4 ,he is an approv$ *ild4 ,:at is x t satisfies ! fa!r 9 su* a case8 ,^u :at does he rely 9 8 hope = matur$ "* 9 ! *ild8 ,:at1 9 biblical language1 cov]s = ! fa!r ! actual disob$i5ces ( ! pa/ & ! c]ta9 disob$i5ces ( ! future1 & enables him 9 a s5se to ignore bo? 9 8 approval ( ! *ild8 ,c]ta9ly1 ! pres5t purpose ( ! *ild1 ! *ild's hone/ int5tion to cop]ate ) ! fa!r 9 ! fa!r's purpose = him4 ,yes2 b z c]ta9ly1 x seems to ! writ]1 n t alone4 ,! fa!r's hope = 8 *ild's /eady gr[? 9 righte\sness dep5ds n only on ! *ild's pres5t int5tion1 b mu* m ^u ! fa!r's own int5tion nev] to give up 9 8 attempt at any co/ to help t *ild to conqu] himself4#hf ,! fa!r may be said "h 9 a true s5se to propitiate himself2 & 8 own fix$ purpose has become a p>tial sub/itute = ! wav]+ purpose ( ! *ild4 ,& ! *ild's full righte\sness is se51 n m]ely 9 an attitude ( imm$iate pres5t ob$i5ce1 b especially 9 8 loyal acceptance ( 8 filial relation--9 8 hone/ surr5d] to 8 fa!r's influ5ce4 ,& ! fa!r c n[ say1 ,because my *ild accepts he>tily 8 relation to me1 & hone/ly ?r[s himself op5 to x to let x be to him all x c & "w its own "w 9 him1 ,i may approve him2 = ?is relation to me :i* he s takes has only to g on1 to "w out its complete results 9 a matur$ "*4 ,9 ! he>ty acceptance ( ?is filial relation to me1 !re is conta9$ ! promise ( ! end4 ,j ?is attitude exactly1 & no o!r1 x seems to ! writ]1 ,god takes t[>d m5 9 8 revelation 9 ,*ri/4 ,*ri/ is ,god's own %[+ =? ( himself4 ,god 0 9 ,*ri/ reconcil+ ! _w unto himself4#hg ,propitiation1 ,beysclag truly says1 is blott+ out1 mak+ am5ds = s9 9 ,god's eyes4 ,n[ :at c cov] ! s9 ( ! _w 9 ,god's eyes8 ,only a p]sonality & a de$ :i* conta9 ! p[] ( actually deliv]+ ! _w f its s94#hh ,we h se51 x may be hop$1 j h[ ,god's self-reveal+ 9 ,*ri/ does h ?is actual p[]1 & becomes1 ?us1 a true propitiation 9 ! highe/ moral s5se1 9 ! only s5se 9 :i* ,god c wi% a propitiation1 & 9 ! only s5se 9 :i* we c ev] ne$ a propitiation4 ,our f9al hope = t true salvation1 :i* is ! %>+ ( ! life ( ,god & ! involv$ lik5ess ( "* ) ,god1 is 9 ,god's own long-suff]+1 r$eem+ activity4 ,only z t may be rememb]$1 9 connection ) our surr5d] to x1 may we hope to /& approv$ be=e ! judgm5t ( ,god4 ,we are n judg$ alone be=e ! judgm5t ( ,god4 ,9 a v real s5se ! judge himself /&s ) u4 ,n :at ,god is able to believe ab\t ?is man ?\ght ( z /&+ alone1 b :at he may believe ab\t ?is man /&+ 9 a liv+1 surr5d]+ association ) himself1 is ! gr\nd ( judgm5t4 ,we may n sep>ate "h ! "w ( ,god & ! "w ( ,*ri/1 z ! ,new ,te/am5t does n sep>ate !m4 ,9 con/ant reliance ^u ! con/ant r$eem+ activity ( ! ,fa!r "h & h]eaft]1 we *ildr5 g hopefully on our way4 ,put into ! language ( ! blood cov5ant1 :]e ! blood has all its significance z life--! giv+ ( life1 ! %>+ ( life1 ! close/ & mo/ indissoluble union ( lives--?is is to say1 !re is no atonem5t1 no reconciliation1 no remission ( s9s1 no =giv5ess--& ^! are all ess5tially id5tical t]ms--)\t %$d+ ( blood1 t is1 )\t complete giv+ ( life on bo? sides1 ,*ri/ giv+ himself n only = u 9 seek+ u out1 b to u 9 complete reconciliation & r5ewal ( life4 ,x means t only ,god1 ! v life ( ,god1 %>+ ,god's life1 c really save "o f 8 s9s4 ,god mu/ p\r 8 life into "o1 & he does1 9 ,*ri/4 ,?is seems to be ! he>t ( ! :ole matt]2 b c]ta9 consid]ations may be /ill add$1 z indicat+ h[ f> a purely e?ical & spiritual view ( ! atonem5t may g1 9 meet+ ! human ne$ express$ 9 ^! old] t]ms ( sub/itution & propitiation4 ,!re mu/ be a wra? ( ,god aga9/ wilful s91 a complete disapproval ( x1 & all ! m because ,god loves ! s9n]4 ,god is a consum+ fire = s9 9 u1 because he loves u4 ,t wra? _c be propitiat$1 t disapproval _c be satisfi$1 9 any effective way1 s long z ! s9 cont9ues4 ,! puni%m5t ( ! s9 9 its inevitable consequ5ces1 w g on 9 ! v fidelity ( ,god4 ,b = any real satisfaction ( ,god1 ! s9 itself mu/ cease1 & !re mu/ be assurance ( righte\sness to come4 ,! s9n] mu/ come to %>e ,god's hatr$ ( ! s9 & ,god's positive purpose ( love4 ,h5ce ! expiation ( ! s91 ! propitiation ( ! wra? ( ,god1 ! satisfaction ( ,god--s f> z ^! t]ms /ill h mean+1 & s f> z !y express ,*ri/'s "w--consi/ 7#a7 9 w9n+ m5 to rep5tance1 to %>+ ,god's hatr$ ( _! s91 7#b7 9 help+ m5 to a real p[] aga9/ s91 & 7#c7 9 ! assurance ( p]fect+ righte\sness :i* is conta9$ 9 ! relation to ,god hone/ly accept$ by m54 ,:51 n[1 ! unfilial _s is ?us *ang$ into a completely filial _s--?r\gh ! fulle/ acceptance by ! *ild ( ! fa!r's purpose = him1 & ?r\gh ! *ild's ?r[+ himself completely op5 to ! influ5ce ( ! fa!r--! p]sonal relation is !reby inevitably *ang$1 p]sonal reconciliation is a*iev$4 ,x is impossible to ?9k x o!rwise4 ,& s ! *ief pa9 9 ! previ\s relation is done away bo? = ,god & man2 ?\gh ! puni%m5t1 9 ! consequ5ces ( s9 9 o!r respects1 is n !reby set aside4 ,b1 fur!r1 s f> n[ z ! p[] ( ?is new p]sonal relation to ,god 9 ,*ri/ beg9s actively to c\nt]act ! consequ5ces ( s9 9 u1 z x w assur$ly d1 ,god's "w 9 ,*ri/ becomes a direct sub/itute = t puni%m5t ( u t w\ld else inevitably foll[4 ,& yet ! process is :olly e?ical2 = ! results ( righte\sness c actually occur 9 u1 only 9 s f> z we come into h>mony ) ,*ri/'s purpose = u4 ,ev5 s f>1 we may believe1 does ! social consci\sness1 9 its emphasis ^u ! mutual influ5ce ( p]sons g1 9 lead+ u into ! secret ( ! atta9m5t ( "*--into ! he>t ( ,god's r$emption ( m54 ,,iv4 ,,mutual ,,influ5ce ,,= ,,good ,,9 ,,our ,,p]sonal ,,relation ,,to ,,god ,:at1 n[1 9 ! second place1 does ! mutual influ5ce ( m5 = good mean = !ology 9 ! individual relation to ,god8 ,"h x may be said at once1 t fai? is z directly contagi\s z "*4 #a4 ,9 ,com+ into ! ,k+dom4--,we are introduc$ ?r\gh o!rs into all sph]es ( value1 includ+ fri5d%ip ev5 ) ,god4 ,9 ! atmosph]e ( ^? :o already feel ! value1 our int]e/ is ar\s$2 we f9d x possible at lea/ to take ^? initial /eps ( a dawn+ att5tion1 :i* give ! value opportunity to make its own impression ^u u1 & br+ u to an appreciation1 to a fai? ( our own4 ,only s is t mo/ difficult ( all tasks 9 ! r$emption ( a man--t fir/ /irr+ ( a new appetite1 a new desire1 a new aspiration1 a new ideal--accompli%$4 ,we are memb]s "o ( ano!r "h to an ext5t t des]ves ev] fre% emphasis4 ,we _c too (t5 say to ourselves1 ,_h x n be5 t !re 7 ^? :o actually ent]$ into ! mean+ ( ! revelation ( ,god 9 ,*ri/--:o1 9 ,john's language1 beheld 8 glory--! record ( t revelation nev] c\ld h come d[n to u4 ,*ri/ianity mu/ h p]i%$ at its bir?4 ,h5ce1 9 ! vital language ( ,h]rmann1 ! picture ( 8 inn] life c\ld be pres]v$ 9 8 *ur* or 'fell[%ip' alone4 ,b1 fur!r1 ?is picture s pres]v$ c be und]/ood only :5 we meet ) m5 on :om x has wr\ght its effect4 ,we ne$ communion ) ,*ri/ians 9 ord] t1 f ! picture ( ,jesus :i* 8 ,bro!rhood has pres]v$1 !re may %9e =? t inn] life :i* is ! real he>t ( x4 ,x is only :5 we see its effects1 t our eyes are op5$ to its reality s t we may !reby exp]i5ce ! same effect4 ,?us we nev] appreh5d ! mo/ important elem5t 9 ! hi/orical appe>ance ( ,jesus until 8 p make u feel x4 ,! te/imony ( ! ,new ,te/am5t conc]n+ ,jesus is ! "w ( 8 *ur*1 & its exposition is ! "w ( ! *ur*1 ?r\gh ! life :i* t *ur* develops & ga9s = itself out ( ?is treasure :i* x possesses4#hi ,! ,*ri/ian is no ,mel*iz$ek1 !n1 )\t fa!r or "m2 he comes into life 9 a community ( life1 & usually1 moreov]1 ?r\gh ! p]sonal t\* ( "s o!r individual life4 ,x is ! "o primal law1 ( life ?r\gh life4 #b4 ,9 ,fell[%ip )9 ! ,k+dom4--,& n only 9 com+ into ! k+dom1 b also )9 ! religi\s fell[%ip ( ! k+dom1 we are emphatically memb]s "o ( ano!r4 ,9 br++ u into t love :i* is ,god's own life1 ,god evid5tly has no int5tion ( all[+ u to cut ourselves (f f our bre?r51 to climb up to heav5 by "s little individual ladd] ( our own4 ,t humility or op5-m9d$ness1 :i* con/itutes ! fir/ beatitude & ! initial /ep into ! k+dom1 & t self-sacrific+ love1 :i* con/itutes ! la/ beatitude & ! cr[n ( ! ,*ri/ian life1 are bo? possible & cultivable only 9 p]sonal relations to o!rs4 ,no man ev] got !m alone4 ,&1 = ?is v reason1 9 ! discussion ( ! religi\s life1 we f\nd ! ,new ,te/am5t gu>d+ mo/ c>efully aga9/ all ov]-e/imation ( m>vel\s exp]i5ces z su*4 ,= ^! t5d$ to make a man feel t he _h su* an individual ladd] ( 8 own to heav51 & _h no ne$1 consequ5tly1 ( 8 bre?r52 & s l$ him into ! v rev]se ( ! fundam5tal ,*ri/ian qualities--into untea*abl5ess in/ead ( humility & op5-m9d$ness1 & into c5sori\sness in/ead ( love4 ,t objective attitude :i* is ess5tial 9 all "* & "w & happ9ess1 _c be unimportant 9 our specifically religi\s life4 ,ev5 9 ?is mo/ individual relation to ,god1 !n1 m5's outlook is v>i$ & b p>tial4 ,we ne$ to %>e1 & c %>e1 "o ano!r's visions4 ,! mean+ ( ! _m-sid$ness ( ev5 a great human p]sonality gets home to u only s--?r\gh ! v>i\s impressions ga9$ by diff]5t m54 ,mu* m c ,god be reveal$ to u1 ev5 approximately1 only s4 ,! great & surpass+ value ( ! ,new ,te/am5t lies exactly h]e91 t x gives ! v>i$ impressions ^u ! fir/ ,*ri/ian g5]ation ( ,god's supreme revelation--! mo/ important individual reflections ( ,*ri/4 ,! ,new ,te/am5t comes to /&1 ?us1 9 no m]ely ext]nal & me*anically au?oritative relation to ! life & fai? ( ! *ur*1 b 9 ! mo/ int]ior & vital relation4 ,& ,bible /udy gets a new significance = u1 z we see x1 z at "o & ! same "t our *ief way to our own vision ( ,god's actual1 concrete self-revelation1 & our deliv]ance f our m]ely subjective dream+4 ,we come to %>e 9 "s liv+ way ! vision ( ^! o!rs :o h se5 mo/ directly & mo/ l>gely4 #c4 ,9 ,int]cessory ,pray]4--,"o p>ticul> application to our religi\s life1 ( ?is conviction ( ! social consci\sness ( our mutual influ5ce1 seems wor?y ( m5tion--its be>+ ^u int]cessory pray]4 ,few o!r ?+s 9 religion1 "o may suspect1 seem less real to mod]n m54 ,c we gr\nd ! matt] a little m deeply = ourselves1 & give x reality1 by %[+ its close connection ) ?is deep-root$ conviction ( ! social consci\sness8 ,we h already se51#ij if "* & love are to be realities to u1 if ! _w is to be a real tra9+-gr\nd = moral "*1 & n a m]e play-_w--a nurs]y cont9ually set to rights f )\t1 t we mu/ all be mo/ closely knit toge!r2 t our *oices mu/ h effects 9 ! lives ( o!rs2 t we mu/ be b\nd up 9 "o bundle ( life4 ,& we d affect "o ano!r's lives 9 a ?\s& ways4 ,9 manifold directions we condition ! happ9ess & temptations ( "o ano!r4 ,! unspok5 mood ( ano!r1 an expression ( c\nt5ance1 a tone1 an emphasis1 may affect our :ole day4 ,n[1 if ! spiritual _w is real at all1 x is to be c\nt$ ^u4 ,app>5tly1 !re is su* a ?+1 = example1 z a spiritual atmosph]e 9 an audi5ce--n1 x may well be suppos$1 a magical matt]1 b really det]m9$ by ! tone ( ! m9ds compos+ ! audi5ce4 ,! actual mood ( ! he>]s & ( ! speak] makes a diff]5ce4 ,results1 great & important1 are s *ang$ (t5 q unconsci\sly4 ,x may well be t ,god is ! m$ium 9 all ?is4 ,! attitude ( ! auditors is l unconsci\s1 sil5t pray+ to ,god--! pray+ ( _! life1 ( _! _s4 ,b1 :e!r "o c>es to look at ?is special case 9 su* a way or n1 we are1 9 any ev5t1 9 our spiritual lives 9 ! deepe/ way memb]s "o ( ano!r4 ,our spiritual condition inevitably affects o!rs4 ,we _c s[ to ! fle% & reap life any:]e1 9 ourselves or 9 o!rs4 ,?is is p>ticul>ly true1 ( c\rse1 ( ^? to :om we are b\nd 9 ! close/ life relations4 ,t ?is is absolutely true 9 normal p]sonal relations1 :5 we are 9 ! pres5ce ( our fri5ds1 all ( u fully believe4 ,! "q simply is1 ,may ?is law ( mutual influ5ce hold ( ^? b\nd up ) our lives ev5 :5 !y are di/ant f u or e/rang$8 ,9 giv+ ! privilege ( int]cessory pray]1 x may well be believ$1 ,god simply all[s u to be1 ev5 !n1 :at we are always s fully "u o!r circum/ances--an influ5ce ^u !m1 a condition ( ! good & gr[? ( o!rs4 ,he simply all[s ! regul> law ( ! spiritual & moral _w to hold )\t exception4 ,we are /ill1 ?\gh di/ant or e/rang$1 memb]s "o ( ano!r4 ,x w\ld be a v human1 defective1 faulty ,god1 :o c\ld n put u ?us 9 t\* ) our lov$ ones ev]y:]e4 ,b ?is is possible ?r\gh him1 & !re=e 9 pray]1 & "u /rictly e?ical & spiritual conditions1 & n z a matt] ( m]e :imsical & wilful w on our "p1 & x op5s no door to magical sup]/ition4 ,is n ! recognition ( ! place & value ( int]cessory pray]1 !n1 an only j ext5sion ( ! prime conviction ( ! social consci\sness8 ,v4 ,,mutual ,,influ5ce ,,= ,,good ,,9 ,,confessions ,,( ,,fai? ,!ology has1 once m1 9 ! ?ird place1 to recognize ! importance ( mutual influ5ce = good 9 confession ( fai?1 9 cre$s4 ,:51 to-day1 we seek ! common gr\nds ( belief = ,*ri/ian ?9k]s1 s f> z ! social consci\sness really moves u1 we approa* ! problem 9 a way some:at diff]5t f t ( previ\s g5]ations4 ,we d n n[ seek to elaborate a second1 mod]n ,we/m9/] confession2 nor d we seek a m]e av]age ( ,*ri/ian ideas t 9 reality expresses no "o's :ole liv+ ?\ght4 ,/ill less is !re s\ght ! b>e/ m9imum ( ,*ri/ian belief4 ,r1 9 h>mony ) ! social consci\sness1 we seek a unity t is organic4 ,our age1 !re=e1 mu/ recognize t1 9 ! confession ( its fai? z 9 all else1 we are g5u9ely memb]s "o ( ano!r4 ,! unity s\ght n only tol]ates diff]5ces1 b welcomes & ju/ifies !m1 z !mselves helps to a deep] unity4 ,x believes 9 equality1 b n 9 id5tity4 ,x is true t ,*ri/ianity looks ev]y:]e to life2 & we may be sure t any /atem5t ( ,*ri/ian doctr9e t does n obvi\sly be> on liv+ is /ill inadequate & incorrect4 ,x is true t we d well to emphasize ! /rictly religi\s & practical purpose ( ! ,bible2 t ! ,bible is int]e/$ 9 bo? nature & hi/ory s f> & only s f> z ei!r reveals ,god & inspires to godly liv+4 ,x is true t 9 all ,*ri/ian ?9k+ ,*ri/ is our ultimate appeal4 ,b1 on ! o!r h&1 we mu/ n confuse ! issue4 ,we _c expect agreem5t 9 detail$ intellectual /atem5ts ev5 ) fulle/ loyalty to ,*ri/1 & ! mo/ e>ne/ desire aft] tru?4 ,to ea* 8 own message4 ,nor c we conf9e1 nor is x desirable to conf9e1 expressions ( ,*ri/ian fai? to ! m]ely practical side4 ,we ne$ to seek to und]/& ! mean+ ( our ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce1 n only = ! sake ( our intellectual peace1 b also = ! sake ( deep5+ our ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce itself4 ,n[1 x is "h cont5d$ t 9 our confessions ( ,*ri/ian fai? we ne$ "o ano!r1 & t complete uni=mity ( belief & /atem5t is bo? impossible & undesirable4 #a4 ,complete ,uni=mity ( ,belief & ,/atem5t ,impossible4--,x is impossible1 =1 9 ! fir/ place1 x is difficult1 9 any case1 to tell our real inn] cre$4 ,"s ( its mo/ important articles are q c]ta9 to be implicit & unconfess$1 ev5 to ourselves4 ,! only important cre$1 9 ! case ( ! individual1 is t :i* f9ds its expression 9 life4 ,!re are assumptions impli$ 9 de$s & _s2 & ! _s ( a man ?r[s m light on 8 real cre$ ?an 8 =mal /atem5ts d4 ,8 doctr9es may be radical1 8 _s ?or\ghly con/ructive1 or vice v]sa4 ,if all ?\ght t5ds to pass into act1 z mod]n psy*ology insi/s1 we h a "r to urge t ^? articles ( a man's cre$ :i* f9d expression 9 liv+1 are = him ! really important articles4 ,! w has a cre$1 z well z ! intellect1 & ! real cre$ is ! cre$ ( life r ?an ( lips2 x is wr\ght out1 r ?an ?\ght out4 ,& ?is real1 inn]1 liv+ cre$ probably no man c /ate ) accuracy ev5 9 8 own case4 ,& if he is ev] able ev5 approximately to d s1 x w be at ! end1 r ?an at ! beg9n+1 ( 8 life's "w & exp]i5ce4 ,moreov]1 complete uni=mity ( belief & /atem5t is impossible1 =1 ev5 exactly ! same words _c mean ! same to diff]5t individuals1 = !y are int]pret$ out ( a diff]5t exp]i5ce2 !y _c mean precisely ! same ?+1 ev5 to ! same individual1 at diff]5t times1 = 8 int]pret+ exp]i5ce1 too1 is a *ang+ ?+4 ,we ne$ sometimes to rem9d ourselves t !re is nev] any lit]al transf] ( ?\ght f m9d to m9d1 /ill less f /atem5t to m9d2 all ?9k+ ( ev5 ! mo/ passive k9d has an elem5t ( creation 9 x1 = t]ms mu/ be int]pret$1 & ! int]pretation is inevitably limit$ by previ\s exp]i5ce4 ,sabati]#ia is q "r1 !re=e1 9 ass]t+ t cr$al /atem5ts mu/ *ange _! mean+ j z words *ange4 ,b x is to be not$ t ?is pr9ciple means n only t unalt]able doctr9e1 9 ?is s5se1 is impossible betwe5 ! g5]ations2 b also t id5tical doctr9e is impossible 9 ! same g5]ation4 ,out ( ! diff]5t exp]i5ces1 too1 gr[ ! diff]5t po9ts ( view & ! diff]5t emphases4 ,& ^! diff]5t po9ts ( view1 & ! diff]5t di/ribution ( emphasis1 give ! same cre$ v diff]5t mean+s = diff]5t m54 ,x is z impossible to avoid ?is1 z x is to avoid *ange & individuality4 ,x is true ( a man's cre$ z ( 8 environm5t1 t ! only effective portions are ^? to :i* he att5ds--^? :i* he emphasizes1 n ^? to :i* he gives a b>e ass5t2 & ?is v>y+ att5tion & emphasis _c be ! same 9 diff]5t individuals4 ,! only logical outcome ( a ?or\gh-go+ attempt to rea* an id5tical cre$ is ! *ur* ( "o memb]4 #b4 ,complete ,uni=mity ( ,belief & ,/atem5t ,undesirable4--,b complete uni=mity ( belief & /atem5t is n only impossible2 x is undesirable4 ,=1 9 ! fir/ place1 x is only by ^! diff]+ b supplem5t>y f9ite expressions t we c approximate to ! inf9ite tru?4 ,l ,leibnitz's mirrors 9 ! m>ket-place1 x is only by comb9+ ! po9ts ( view ( all t a complete repres5tation is possible4 ,we ne$ "o ano!r "h1 z else:]e2 we ne$ ! fell[%ip ( ! *ur*1 & ( ! :ole *ur*2 ! /rictly individual view mu/ be fragm5t>y4 ,our message ne$s ! supplem5t ( ! messages ( o!rs2 ?r\gh ea* memb] ,god has some?+ unique to say4 ,!y )\t u1 we )\t !m1 are n to be made p]fect4 ,we ne$ to %>e1 9 su* measure z is possible1 ! exp]i5ces ( o!rs2 b ?is is possible only ?r\gh vital contact4 ,moreov]1 we are n to =get h[ tru? comes--n by surr5d] ( convictions1 n by ! sil5ce ( ea*1 b by ea* /&+ e>ne/ly = ! tru? :i* is giv5 to him1 9 a union ( conviction & *>ity4 ,= only he :o has convictions c be tol]ant1 z only he :o has fe>s c be c\rage\s4 ,once m1 we _c & mu/ n simply repeat ea* o!r4 ,no?+ is s fatal to spiritual life z di%one/y4 ,to attempt an id5tical cre$ involves some?+ ( su* untrue repetition ( ! exp]i5ce ( o!rs4 ,=1 z ,h]rmann has said1 doctr9es are an expression ( life already pres5t1 & are ( value only s2 !y are n !mselves a condition ( life4 ,if ! doctr9es we pr(ess are n ! hone/ expression ( a real life 9 u1 !y are a h9drance1 n a help4 ,consci\s untru? t5ds to drive f ,*ri/4 ,= e "o ( ^! reasons1 n[1 x is positively undesirable to =bid v>y+ !ories or to *eck ! v>i$ expressions ( ,*ri/ian fai?1 :e!r 9 accordance or n ) c]ta9 /&>d =mulas4 ,a gr[+ life requires a gr[+ expression1 :i* mu/ be ju/ifi$ by its hi/ory1 n dogmatically by ref]5ce to "s suppos$ fix$ /&>d ( doctr9e 9 ! pa/4 ,! v mean+ & heal? ( ,*ri/ian fell[%ip dem& t we %\ld welcome & enc\rage ! hone/ expression ( ! v>i$ manife/ations ( ! ,"o ,_s1 t we may be ! m c]ta9 to get ! :ole tru?1 ! :ole life :i* ,god int5ds4 ,we are memb]s "o ( ano!r1 9 doctr9e z 9 life4 ,x becomes increas+ly cle>1 ?us1 :]e ! real ,*ri/ian unity is1 & :]e ! common gr\nds ( ,*ri/ian belief mu/ be s\ght4 ,! real unity ( ,*ri/ians is 9 _! common life1 9 ! common exp]i5ce1 9 ! possession ( ! common p]sonal self-revelation ( ,god 9 ,*ri/1 9 ! inwork+ ( ! ,"o ,_s4 ,x is ! mean+ ( ?is "o c5tral ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce1 :i* we /rive to express 9 our doctr9al /atem5ts4 ,our expressions mu/ v>y2 ! life1 ! p]sonal relation to ,god1 is "o4 ,! be/ analogy we h ( ! case lies 9 :at ! same great fri5d means to diff]5t p]sons4 ,our cre$s are at be/ poor & p>tial expressions ( ! mean+ = u ( ! div9e fri5d%ip1 ( ,god's self-revelation to u4 ,x is1 !n1 precisely 9 our ,*ri/ian exp]i5ce & 9 t p]sonal relation to ,god reveal$ 9 ,*ri/ :i* makes a man a ,*ri/ian at all1 t all ! common gr\nds ( ,*ri/ian belief lie4 ,! solution ( ,*ri/ian unity "h1 t is1 is n by increas+ ab/raction1 b by frank concret5ess2 n by false simplicity1 b by liv+ fullness2 n by relation to propositions1 b by relation to facts2 n by emphasis on natural religion1 b by emphasis on hi/orical religion2 n by br++ nature into prom95ce1 b human nature2 n by relation to ?+s1 b by relation to p]sons1 to ! "o great _w fact1 ! "o p]son1 to ,*ri/4 ,i am ! ,way4 ,! ,*ri/ian fai? is fai? 9 a p]son2 ! ,*ri/ian confession ( fai? is confession ( ,*ri/4 ,& if we are really 9 e>ne/ ) ?is ^w ,*ri/ian1 we already h our basis ( unity 9 our p]sonal relation to ,*ri/1 our common ,"l4 ,b t p]sonal relation to ,god 9 ,*ri/ is always m ?an a cr$al /atem5t c express1 ?\gh we may nev] cease to attempt su* expression2 & = ! sake ( ! l>g] realization1 by ourselves & by ! *ur*1 ( ! mean+ ( ! p]sonal relation to ,*ri/1 we mu/ welcome e hone/ expression ( 8 ,*ri/ian life by ano!r4 ,altoge!r1 we %all at be/ b dimly %ad[ =? its full mean+4 ,& su* a concrete relation to ! p]sonal ,*ri/ is a f> bett] te/ ( g5u9e ,*ri/ian fai? ?an any cre$1 :e!r m or less elaborate1 s9ce 9 ! p]sonal relation "* inevitably comes out2 & any te/ t all[s ev5 = ! mom5t ! ignor+ ( ! e?ical1 _c rema9 ev5 intellectually adequate1 = ,*ri/ian doctr9e looks always & c]ta9ly to life4 ,ev5 if "o is ?9k+ only ( ! correct intellectual expression ( ! common ,*ri/ian life--! ma9t5ance ( or?odoxy1 s f> z t is possible to u--x %\ld be rememb]$ t ! mo/ cons]vative ( all influ5ces is love ( a p]son1 &1 by no means1 subscription to a set ( propositions4 ,w\ld ,*ri/ s ?9k8 ,w\ld he s speak8--^! are que/ions f> m c]ta9 to keep ,*ri/ian ?9k+ true1 ?an any intellectual te/ ( man's devis+4 ,we d n expect1 !re=e1 we d n seek1 any common gr\nds ( belief = ,*ri/ian ?9k]s1 o!r ?an are involv$ 9 ! simple fact t we are ,*ri/ians at all1 9 ! common recognition ( ! revelation ( ,god 9 ,*ri/--( ! ,lord%ip ( ,*ri/4 ,we confess ,*ri/4 ,=1 no man c say1 ,jesus is ,"l1 b 9 ! ,holy ,_s4 ,& o!r f\ndation c no man lay1 ?an t :i* is laid1 :i* is ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,n[1 9 ?is common confession1 x is "h especially ma9ta9$1 we are1 z ev]y:]e1 memb]s "o ( ano!r & ne$ "o ano!r2 & ! unity we seek1 !re=e1 is n ! unity ( id5tical cr$al /atem5t--:i* c only make u isolat$ atoms n necess>y to "o ano!r--b ! deep] & l>g] organic unity ( ! ri*ly v>y+ manife/ations ( ! common life 9 ,*ri/4 ,we may come1 ?r\gh ! witness ( ano!r1 to an appreciation ( ,*ri/ :i* is really our own1 b to :i* we %\ld n h come if ! o!r _h n spok54 ,m5 d mutually influ5ce "o ano!r = good1 9 _! confessions ( ,*ri/ian fai?4 ,,vi4 ,,! ,,consequ5t ,,importance ,,( ,,! ,,doctr9e ,,( ,,! ,,*ur* ,9 ?is recognition ( ! vital & ess5tial importance ( mutual influ5ce 9 ! atta9m5t ( "*1 9 ! individual relation to ,god1 & 9 cre$1 !ology is br\ght to a new s5se ( ! significance ( ! doctr9e ( ! *ur*4 ,on ! "o h&1 x _c d]ive its importance f hav+ to d ) an unalt]ably fix$ & infallibly organiz$ ext]nal au?ority2 &1 on ! o!r h&1 x c be no long] an unimportant add5dum conc]n$ only ) me?ods ( organization & gov]nm5t1 & ) ecclesia/ical ord9ances & proc$ure4 ,s f> z ! social consci\sness has influ5ce ^u !ology at ?is po9t1 !ology mu/ see t ! doctr9e ( ! *ur* is ! doctr9e ( t priceless1 liv+1 p]sonal fell[%ip1 9 :i* alone ,*ri/ian "*1 ,*ri/ian fai?1 & ,*ri/ian confession c arise & c cont9ue4 ,! doctr9e ( ! *ur* becomes ?us ! doctr9e ( ! v life & gr[? ( ,*ri/ianity 9 ! _w4 ,x is ! doctr9e ( ! real k+dom ( ,god1 ,*ri/'s own great c5tral !me4 #gh ,cf4 above1 pp4 #ce ff4 #gi ,! ,elem5ts ( ,sociology1 pp4 #aai1 #abj1 #aba4 #hj ,! ,ideal ,life1 p4 #adi4 #ha ,! ,place ( ,*ri/ 9 ,mod]n ,!ology1 p4 #dee4 #hb ,james1 ,psy*ology1 ,vol4 ,,ii1 p4 #egi4 #hc ,cf4 ,hebrews #aj3aj4 #hd ,an ,outl9e ( ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 p4 #cce4 #he ,op4 cit41 p4 #dei4 #hf ,cf4 ,romans #h3bf-ci4 #hg ,,ii ,cor9?ians #e3ai4 #hh ,! ,!ology ( ! ,new ,te/am5t1 ,vol4 ,,ii1 p4 #ddh4 #hi ,! ,communion ( ! ,*ri/ian ) ,god1 p4 #fa2 cf4 p4 #hg4 #ij ,cf4 above1 p4 #cb4 #ia ,! ,vitality ( ,*ri/ian ,dogmas & _! ,p[] ( ,evolution4 ,,*apt] ,,xii ,,! ,,influ5ce ,,( ,,! ,,deep5+ ,,s5se ,,( ,,! ,,value ,,& ,,sacr$ness ,,( ,,! ,,p]son ,,^u ,,!ology ,9 ! discussion ( ! influ5ce ( ! social consci\sness ^u !ological doctr9e1 we turn n[ to ask conc]n+ ! ?ird elem5t ( ! social consci\sness1 ,h[ does ! deep5+ s5se ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son affect !ology8 ,& ) ?is s5se ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son1 we may well include1 s f> z ! influ5ce ^u !ology is conc]n$1 ! rema9+ elem5ts ( ! social consci\sness--! deep5+ s5se ( obligation1 & ( love4 ,=1 z we h already se51 ! s5se ( obligation & ( love foll[ s inevitably f a deep s5se ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son1 t x w\ld be a ne$less ref9em5t1 probably1 to try to analyze out _! sep>ate influ5ce ^u !ological ?9k+4 ,we %\ld f9d !m all lead+ u to ess5tially ! same great emphases4 ,:51 n[1 ?r\gh ! social consci\sness1 ! p]sonal has become ! supreme value = u1 & reg>d = x our et]nal motive & goal1 we _c fail to dem& t !ology give a real p]sonality to ,god & man--a consci\sness m>k$1 9 ,pr(essor ,h[ison's language1 ) t recognition & rev]5ce ( ! p]sonal initiative ( o!r m9ds :i* is at once ! sign & ! te/ ( ! true p]son4#ib ,i4 ,,! ,,recognition ,,( ,,! ,,p]sonal ,,9 ,,man ,9 ! fir/ place1 ! social s5se ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son w emphasize ! full p]sonality ( man4 #a4 ,man's ,p]sonal ,sep>at5ess f ,god4--,! s5se ( ! value ( ! p]son _c admit = a mom5t su* a "o-sid$ emphasis ^u a univ]sal cosmic evolution1 or ^u ! imman5ce ( ,god1 z %\ld make impossible a true p]sonality 9 man4 ,x seeks1 9 its view ( bo? ,god & man1 a really p]sonal idealism4 ,x does n =get1 b e>ne/ly ass]ts1 ! dep5d5ce ( all o!r spirits ^u ,god2 &1 consequ5tly1 looks = no metaphysical sep>at5ess 9 ?is s5se f ,god4 ,b a g5u9e recognition ( ! p]sonality ( man does require t man be conceiv$ z sep>ate f ,god 9 j ?is s5se3 7#a7 t he has a cle> self-consci\sness ( 8 own1 & 7#b7 t he has real moral initiative1 :i* makes 8 volition truly 8 own4 ,^! two factors con/itute all ( sep>at5ess t ne$ be dem&$ = man4 ,possess+ ^!1 he is outside ( ,god 9 ! only s5se 9 :i* a p]sonal idealism feels conc]n$ to ass]t sep>at5ess4 ,b = ^! factors x is conc]n$2 = )\t !m1 x believes1 no truly ideal view1 no moral _w1 no religi\s life1 are possible4 #b4 ,emphasis ,^u ,man's ,moral ,initiative4--,9 p>ticul>1 ! application ( ! s5se ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son 9 !ology1 means ! emphatic recognition ( ! moral initiative ( man--( ! possession ( a real w ( 8 own4 ,! :ole social consci\sness1 especially 9 ?is ?ird elem5t ( x1 re/s ^u ! assumption t man has wor?1 z a be+ capable ( "* z well z ( happ9ess1 & s des]ves 9 "s wor?y s5se to be call$ a *ild ( ,god4 ,if ! social consci\sness is1 z we h se51 ) any fairness to be call$ ! recognition ( ! fully p]sonal1#ic ?is rev]5ce = ! p]sonal initiative ( m5 _c be lack+ 9 x4 ,its influ5ce ^u !ology at ?is po9t1 !re=e1 is h>dly to be d\bt$4 ,& !ology itself is vitally conc]n$4 ,= ! :ole possibility ( ! conceptions ( gov]nm5t & provid5ce requires ?is4 ,^! t]ms are words )\t mean+1 hav+ absolutely no place 9 !ology or philosophy1 if man has no moral initiative4 ,nor %\ld x escape our notice1 t we /rike at ! v root ( all possible rev]5ce = ,god1 if we d5y a real initiative to man4 ,we h no possible philosophic explanation ( ei!r s9 or error1 consi/5t ) any real rev]5ce = ,god1 if a true human w is d5i$4#id ,9 ,pr(essor ,b[ne's vigor\s language3 ,9 a sy/em ( necessity e ?\ght1 belief1 conviction1 :e!r tru? or sup]/ition1 arises ) equal necessity ) e o!r4444 ,on ?is plane ( necess>y effect ! actual is all1 & ! ideal di/9ctions ( true & false h z little mean+ z !y w\ld h on ! plane ( me*anical =ces4444 ,! only escape f ! ov]?r[ ( reason involv$ 9 ! fact ( error lies 9 ! assumption ( fre$om4 ,moreov]1 if real human initiative is d5i$ to m51 we conceive ,god z hav+ really less respect = p]sons 9 8 deal+ ) !m1 ?an ! mo/ elem5t>y e?ics requires ( m5 9 _! relations to "o ano!r4 ,a "o-sid$ doctr9e ( imman5ce1 ?us1 degrades bo? man & ,god4 ,x degrades man1 9 d5y+ to him a true p]sonality1 & s mak+ him simply a ?+4 ,x degrades ,god1 9 mak+ him ! real responsible cause ( all s9 & error1 & 9 mak+ him treat possible p]sons z ?+s4 ,! influ5ce ( ! social consci\sness1 :i* leads u to measure ! moral gr[? ( a man & ( a civilization by ! deep5+ s5se ( rev]5ce = ! p]son1 is fairly decisive at ?is po9t4 ,x mu/ see 9 ,god ! mo/ absolute gu>d+ ( man's p]sonality1 & especially ( 8 moral initiative4 #c4 ,man1 a ,*ild ( ,god4--,! ,*ri/ian fai?1 t man is a *ild ( ,god1 is a fai?ful expression ( ! insi/5ce ( ! social consci\sness ^u ! recognition ( ! full p]sonality ( man4 ,x expresses bo? man's entire dep5d5ce ^u ,god = 8 be+ & ma9t5ance1 & at ! same "t 8 inf9ite value & sacr$ness z a _s made 9 ! image ( ,god1 capable ( indef9ite progress1 & capable ( p]sonal relation to ,god4 ,x voices ?us ,*ri/ianity's *>act]i/ic humbly-pr\d conception ( man--humble 9 view ( ! et]nal & inf9ite plans ( ,god2 pr\d1 z call$ to an imp]i%able "w 9 ! _w4 ,x is1 inde$1 b a concrete /atem5t ( t fai? 9 love at ! he>t ( ?+s1 & 9 ! all-embrac+ plan ( a fai?ful ,god1 :i* we f\nd requir$1 if ! social consci\sness itself 0 to h any ju/ification4#ie ,,ii4 ,,! ,,recognition ,,( ,,! ,,p]sonal ,,9 ,,*ri/ ,9 ! second place1 "u ?is impulse ( ! s5se ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son1 !ology is likely to insi/ on ! recognition ( ! p]sonal 9 ! conception ( ,*ri/4 #a4 ,*ri/ a ,p]sonal ,revelation ( ,god4--,?is recognition ( ! p]sonal 9 ,*ri/ w mean1 fir/1 t we are to conceive ,*ri/ z a p]sonal revelation ( ,god1 r ?an z conta9+ 9 himself a div9e sub/ance4#if ,x _c =get1 t if ,god is a p]son1 & m5 are p]sons1 ! adequate self-revelation ( ,god to m5 c be made only 9 a truly p]sonal life2 & t m5 ne$ above all1 9 _! relation to ,god1 "s manife/ation ( 8 e?ical w1 & ?is c be %[n only 9 ! "* ( a p]son4 ,a m]ely metaphysical conception ( ! div9ity ( ,*ri/ 9 t]ms ( sub/ance or ess5ce1 z ^! are commonly ?\ght1 mu/1 !re=e1 :olly fail to satisfy4 ,we mu/ be able to recognize & b[ be=e ! p]sonal w ( ! p]sonal ,god reveal$ 9 ,*ri/1 if we are really to f9d ,god ?r\gh him4 ,a /rong s5se ( ! p]sonal1 !n1 su* z ! social consci\sness ev9ces1 mu/ see 9 ,*ri/1 above all1 a p]sonal revelation ( a p]son4 #b4 ,emphasiz+ ! ,moral & ,spiritual 9 ,ass]t+ ! ,supremacy ( ,*ri/4--,?is implies t ! dom9ant s5se ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son w c]ta9ly t5d to br+ into prom95ce ! moral & spiritual 9 ass]t+ ! supremacy ( ,*ri/1 r ?an ! metaphysical or ! simply miracul\s4 ,s f> z ^! latt] come into its repres5tation at all1 !y w foll[ r ?an prec$e1 & be accept$ because ( ! moral & spiritual1 or z simply work+ hypo!ses enabl+ u to br+ into a ?\ght-unity :at we h to recognize 9 ! moral & spiritual realm4 ,if "o faces ! matt] fully & frankly1 is x n pla9 t ,*ri/ians ( all %ades ( belief are increas+ly f9d+ ! real reason = _! fai? 9 ,*ri/ 9 8 moral & spiritual supremacy8 ,_m may *oose to express _! fai? 9 him1 :5 once rea*$1 9 t]ms ( ! miracul\s or metaphysical2 b ! miracul\s & ! metaphysical are n ! prim>y reasons = _! fai?4 ,x is ! inn] _s ( ,*ri/ himself :i* really ma/]s u & calls out our confid5t fai? & our eag] submission4 ,& x is only :5 we h already gott5 ?is s5se ( ! /up5d\sness ( 8 p]sonality1 t ! s-call$ miracul\s 9 8 life becomes to our ?\ght natural & fitt+1 & we are driv5 to ?9k him /&+ 9 "s unique relation to ,god & s requir+ to be conceiv$ 9 unique metaphysical t]ms4 ,x is easy1 no d\bt1 to indulge 9 a false polemic aga9/ ! miracul\s & metaphysical4 ,"o ( ! sure/ bits ( autobiography we h f ,*ri/1 ! n>rative ( ! temptations1 implies1 z ,s&ay has acutely po9t$ out1#ig ! cle> consci\sness on ! "p ( ,*ri/ ( ! possession ( :at we call sup]natural p[]s4 ,x is a f> less simple problem to rid ! gospels ( ! miracul\s elem5t1 ?an our age1 ) its greatly exagg]at$ e/imate ( ! ma!matico-me*anical view ( ! _w1 is likely to ?9k4 ,! s-call$ miracul\s 9 connection ) ,*ri/ is n to be impati5tly & dogmatically set aside4#ih ,s1 too1 ! dem& ( ?\ght1 t we =m f9ally "s metaphysical conception ( ! great p]sonality :i* we meet 9 ,*ri/ _c be d5i$ z :olly illegitimate4 ,all ?is is to be freely grant$ & ass]t$4 ,b x is ( ! greate/ importance = ,*ri/ian ?\ght1 t x /ill keep ,*ri/'s own absolute subord9ation ( bo? ! miracul\s & metaphysical to ! moral & ! spiritual4 ,! same n>rative ( ! temptation1 t s cle>ly implies sup]natural p[]s 9 ,*ri/1 has its :ole po9t 9 ,*ri/'s answ]+ det]m9ation absolutely to subord9ate ^! sup]natural p[]s to moral & spiritual ends4 ,8 :ole m9i/ry ev9ces ! greate/ pa9s ^u ?is po9t4 ,& he evid5tly ?9ks a !ory ( 8 metaphysical relation to ,god 7z ord9>ily conceiv$7 ( s little vital importance t ev5 su* slight h9ts z we get ( x 9 ! ,new ,te/am5t app>5tly d n come f him at all4 ,! pres5t t5d5cy1 !re=e1 naturally dem&$ by ! social consci\sness1 to emphasize ! moral & spiritual 9 ,*ri/ 9 ass]t+ 8 supremacy1 is q 9 h>mony ) ,*ri/'s own insi/5ce4 ,he w be foll[$ = :at he is 9 himself4 ,! real supremacy ( ,*ri/1 8 true/ div9ity1 we may be sure1 comes out = our "t 9 ^? /atem5ts :i* we are able to make conc]n+ 8 inn] _s4 ,"h1 & "h only1 ! real p[] ( 8 p]sonality gets hold ^u u4 ,:at are ^! gr\nds ( ! supremacy ( ,*ri/8 ,h[ is x t we come to ,god ?r\gh him8 #c4 ,! ,moral & ,spiritual ,gr\nds ( ! ,supremacy ( ,*ri/4#ii--7a7 ,9 ! fir/ place1 ,jesus ,*ri/ is ! greate/ 9 ! greate/ sph]e1 t ( ! moral & spiritual2 & ?is1 by common cons5t ( all m54 ,bo? ! dep? & ! cons5sus ( conviction conc]n+ ,*ri/ are pr(\ndly significant4 ,if our e>? has ev] se5 "o ( :om x c\ld be truly said1 ,he is a moral & spiritual au?ority1 prem95tly ! "o great au?ority 9 ?is greate/ sph]e1--t p]son is ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,see+ ! moral problem m broadly ?an any o!r ev] saw x1 trac+ ! motives ( life m deeply ?an any o!r ev] trac$ !m1 apply+ ^? pr9ciples ( ! life :i* he sees ) a tact & delicacy & skill t no o!r ev] approa*$1 speak+ ) an au?ority 9 ?is moral & spiritual sph]e to :i* no o!r c = a mom5t lay claim1--?is man is easily ! greate/ 9 ! greate/ sph]e4 ,x is1 p]haps1 to say only ! same ?+ 9 a little diff]5t way1 :5 "o says ) ,fairbairn1 t ,*ri/ is transc5d5t among f\nd]s ( religion1 & to be transc5d5t "h is to be transc5d5t ev]y:]e1 = religion is ! supreme factor 9 ! organiz+ & ! regulat+ ( our p]sonal & collective life4#ajj ,! pres5t age is1 m ?an any o!r1 ! age ( ! sci5tific /udy ( religion4 ,! la/ =ty ye>s1 inde$1 h se5 su* att5tion to ! /udy ( comp>ative religion z ! _w nev] saw be=e4 ,:at has be5 ! outcome ( t /udy8 ,to make ! relative position ( ,jesus among ! f\nd]s ( religion l[]8 ,i d n s und]/& x4 ,no1 ! outcome is su* t x is a manife/ly inadequate /atem5t to say1 t he is transc5d5t among ! f\nd]s ( religion4 ,! v mo/ t we may hope to say ab\t ! f\nd] ( any o!r religion is1 t 9 "s s+le p>ticul> at a long di/ance he c be br\ght into comp>ison ) ,jesus4 ,b let "o ?9k = a mom5t :at x means = a man to be a f\nd] ( religion4 ,we talk ( lead]%ip4 ,d we "k :at a f\nd] ( religion does8 ,he makes ! light1 9 :i* millions ( m5 look ^u all ! ev5ts ( _! life1 9 :i* !y see ! pa/ ( ! _w's hi/ory1 9 :i* !y look =w>d to ! entire future4 ,! v mood & atmosph]e ( m5's lives are det]m9$ by ^! f\nd]s ( religion2 & among ^! prem95t lead]s1 ,jesus1 beyond all mi/ake1 is transc5d5t4 ,let ! nature ( 8 k+dom1 too1 be 8 witness4 ,he calmly aims to f\nd a k+dom t %all be spiritual1 univ]sal1 et]nal4 ,"o mu/ face ! fact t ?is man ( ,naz>e? 9 ,syrian ,galilee1 purposes 9 coolness ( delib]ation to f\nd a k+dom t %all be absolutely spiritual1 t %all make no appeal to any ( ! l[] elem5ts ( man2 "o mu/ see t ?is man1 9 ^? temptations ?r\gh :i* he pass$ conc]n+ ! =m ( 8 "w1 delib]ately set aside ! k+dom by bread1 ! k+dom by m>vel & ec/asy1 & ! k+dom by =ce1 & purpos$ to f\nd a k+dom solely ^u moral & spiritual =ces4 ,& obs]ve t he confid5tly expects ?is k+dom to be univ]sal--appeal+ to m5 ( all races & ( all times1 & to be et]nal--/ill /&+ :5 all else %all h pass$ away4 ,& ^u 8 belief 9 ?is "* ( 8 k+dom he /akes 8 life1 & calmly gives to himself z ! goal ( 8 life ! e/abli%m5t ( j su* a k+dom2 & rema9s to ! end confid5t ( 8 success4 ,! m]e vitality ( w 9 su* a purpose is h>d to take 91 & alone may well give u pause4 ,& because he is ! greate/ 9 ! greate/ sph]e1 transc5d5t among f\nd]s ( religion1 ! f\nd] ( a k+dom spiritual1 univ]sal1 & et]nal1 he becomes = u a p]sonaliz$ consci5ce1 a spiritual1 moral au?ority = u ev5 beyond our own consci5ce--an au?ority t gr[s ^u u ) our gr[?1 & submission to :i* is e>?'s highe/ moral te/4 7#b7 ,& !re mu/ be add$ to ?is fir/ proposition1 t ,jesus is ! greate/ 9 ! greate/ sph]e1 a second3 ,he alone is ! s9less & imp5it5t "o4 ,& x is to be notic$ t x is ?is man :o sees m cle>ly ?an any o!r ! moral & spiritual1 :o kn[s1 z no o!r does1 :at "* is & :at moral life means1--x is he1 :o claims to be ! s9less "o4 ,no o!r ev] intellig5tly made ?is claim2 = no o!r 0 x ev] intellig5tly made4 ,! words ( ! great hi/orian ,ranke seem to u to be simple tru? :5 he says3 ,m guiltless & m p[]ful1 m exalt$ & m holy has naught ev] be5 on e>? ?an 8 conduct1 8 life1 & 8 dea?4 ,! human race kn[s no?+ t c\ld be br\ght ev5 af> (f into comp>ison ) x4 ,only su* an "o c\ld intellig5tly make = himself ! claim ( s9lessness4 ,& = no o!r 0 ?is claim ( s9lessness ev] intellig5tly made4 ,m5 "k ea* o!r too well to make x = o!rs :5 moral consci\sness has fully awak5$4 ,b he fights 8 battle 9 ! wild]ness1 & !re is no record ( failure s f> z he himself c see x1 & none t disciple ev] ascrib$4 ,& ?is claim ( s9lessness = ,*ri/ is to be urg$1 n s mu* because ( any special /atem5ts by ,*ri/ z because ( t rem>kable fact to :i* ,dr4 ,bu%nell has call$ att5tion1--8 imp5it5ce4 ,jesus alone among all good m5 is a man ( imp5it5t piety2 & by ?is he is m>k$ (f absolutely f e o!r good man4 ,:at happ5s 9 ! life ( any o!r good man is ?is3 t1 z he goes =w>d1 ! s5se ( s9 gr[s ^u him1 ! ideal rises be=e him & he feels increas+ly t 8 own life is inf]ior to x4 ,( ,jesus ?is is n true4 ,he %[s no sign ( consci\sness ( failure4 ,!re is no evid5ce t he feels t he has fall5 %ort 9 any degree4 ,he is absolutely )\t t univ]sal *>act]i/ic ( all o!r good m51 absolutely )\t p5it5ce4 ,contra/ him = a mom5t ) ! man1 :o p]haps all w\ld agree 0 ! greate/ ( all 8 disciples1 ! man to ^: devotion !re seems to be no limit--! ,apo/le ,paul2 & notice1 t ye>s aft] 8 p]secution ( ! *ur* & ( ! cause ( ,jesus1 ) gr[+ s5se ( :at ,jesus is1 & ( 8 own inexhau/ible debt to him1 !re comes ov] him ) increas+1 n less5+1 p[] ! s5se ( 8 s91 & he writes to ! ,ephesians1 ,unto me1 :o am less ?an ! lea/ ( all sa9ts1 0 ?is grace giv5 me t ,i might prea* unto ! ,g5tiles ! unse>*able ri*es ( ,*ri/2 & 9 "o ( ! v la/ lett]s t comes d[n to u f him1 says aga91 ,fai?ful is ! say+ & wor?y ( all acceptation1 t ,*ri/ ,jesus came into ! _w to save s9n]s2 ( :om ,i am *ief4 ,:at evid5ce h we t ,*ri/ ev] felt 9 ! slighte/ degree su* p5it5ce8 7#c7 ,b m ?an ?is is true4 ,) ! highe/ ideal1 ,jesus n only does n consci\sly fall %ort ( x1 b consci\sly rises up to x1 &1 z ,h]rmann says1 compels u to admit t he does rise to x4 ,x 7 v mu* t a man ) any ideal1 h[ev] inf]ior1 %\ld be able to say to himself1 ,i h n fall5 %ort ( ?is ideal2 b t "o1 :o sees m cle>ly ?an any o!r 9 ! realm ( ! moral & spiritual1 & :o has an ideal ( simply absolute love & ( unb\nd$ tru/ 9 ,god1--t he %\ld %[ n only no consci\sness ( fall+ %ort1 b %\ld consci\sly rise to 8 ideal & compel u to admit t he rises to x3 ?is is a fact unp>allel$ 9 ! hi/ory ( ! _w4 ,x is f> m ?an m]e s9lessness2 !re is "h a positiv5ess ( moral a*ievem5t s great--a fact s trem5d\s--t we seem able b feebly to take x 94 7#d7 ,& ev5 t is n all4 ,jesus has su* a "* t we c transf] x feature by feature to ,god1 n only ) no s5se ( blasphemy1 n only ) no s5se ( 8 com+ %ort1 b ) complete satisfaction4 ,i d n n[ ask at all z to any man's metaphysical !ory ab\t ,jesus ,*ri/2 ,i only ask t x be notic$ t ^? :o "q common !ories altoge!r /ill get _! ideal ( ,god f ,jesus ,*ri/2 & t ?is is ! wond]ful ?+ t has happ5$ on our e>?3 t !re has once liv$ a man--daily mov+ ab\t among m51 a concrete circum/antial acc\nt ( ^: life 9 _m p>ticul>s we h--! features ( ^: "* "o c transf] absolutely to ,god & say1 ,t is :at ,i mean by ,god4 ,"o simply _c add any?+ to ! "* ( ,god himself 9 ! highe/ mom5ts ( 8 imag9ation1 t is n already reveal$ 9 ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,i take x t ! words ( ,fairbairn are lit]ally true3 he 0 ! fir/ be+ :o _h realiz$ = m5 ! idea ( ! ,div9e4 ,:51 !re=e1 ,philip said to him1 ,"l1 %[ u ! ,fa!r & x suffice? u1 he c\ld only reply z he might any day to u1 ,h ,i be5 s long "t ) y1 & do/ ?\ n "k me1 ,philip8 he t ha? se5 me ha? se5 ! ,fa!r4 7#e7 ,& "o _c /op "h4 ,jesus is consci\sly able to r$eem all m54 ,) su* s5se ( ! mean+ ( s9 & ( moral conduct z no o!r ev] _h1 und]/&+1 !re=e1 ! s9 & ne$ ( m5 z no o!r ev] did1 & hav+ su* a vision ( :at x is p]fectly to %>e ! life ( ,god z no o!r ev] _h1 /ill1 fac+ ! masses ( m51 he c\ld say to himself1 ,i am able to take ^! m5 & lift !m into ! v pres5ce ( ,god & pres5t !m spotless be=e ! ?rone ( 8 glory4 ,h we tak5 9 :at x means1 t1 9 ! consci\sness ( a man 9 =m l ourselves1 !re c\ld be1 ev5 = a mom5t1 ! actual belief t he 0 ! "o t 0 to take away ! s9 ( ! _w1 & _h p[] to r$eem m5 absolutely unto ,god8 ,9 ano!r's words3 ,jesus kn[s no m sacr$ task ?an to po9t m5 to 8 own p]son4 ,he is himself ,god's greate/ gift1 himself ! way1 ! tru?1 ! life1--n only fight+ 8 own battles1 b consci\sly able to r$eem all m54 7#f7 ,?is simply implies1 z ,dr4 ,d5ison has sugge/$1 t ,jesus has su* ,god-consci\sness & su* s5se ( mission z w\ld simply topple any o!r bra9 t ! _w has ev] kn[n into insanity1 b :i* simply keeps him sweet1 normal1 rational1 liv+ ! mo/ :olesome & simple & noble life ! _w has ev] se54 ,h[ are we to expla9 t fact8 ,on ! "o h&1 ! s5se ( be+ ( ev5 a little importance 9 ! k+dom ( ,god proves s+ul>ly intoxicat+ to m54 ,h[ (t51 :5 "o is /rongly possess$ by ! idea t he is a special *annel ( manife/ation = ,god1 d moral sanity1 influ5ce1 & "* all suff]6 ,on ! o!r h&1 !re is no burd5 ( suff]+ t m5 c be> s great z suff]+ 9 ! s9 ( "o lov$--?us be>+ ! s9 ( ano!r4 ,b "h is "o :o c believe t1 :5 m5 come to him & simply see him z he is1 !y cat* _! be/ vision ( ,god2 "h is "o :o be>s consci\sly ! s9 ( all m51 & :o c believe t he has absolute p[] to revolutionize ! lives ( o!r m5 & make !m :at !y 7 meant orig9ally to be1 *ildr5 ( ,god2 & yet1 believ+ ?is1 c1 "u t consci\sness1 keep sweet & normal1 :olesome & simple1 en]getically e?ical & ?or\ghly rational1--c keep sane4 ,inde$1 he lives a life s sane1 t1 to pass ev5 f "s ( our be/ religi\s books into ! simple atmosph]e ( ! /ory ( 8 life (t5 seems l pass+ f ! sup]-heat$1 artificially light$1 heavily p]fum$ & exhau/$ atmosph]e ( ! cr[d$ draw+-room into ! op5 fre% air ( day "u ! heav5 ( ,god4 ,9 ! v act ( ! mo/ /up5d\s self-ass]tion1 ,jesus c /ill *>act]ize himself z meek & l[ly ( he>t1 & we feel no self-contradiction--s completely has he h>moniz$ = ev5 our unconsci\s feel+ 8 transc5d5t self-consci\sness & 8 humble simplicity ( life4 ,has ! _w any:]e a ph5om5on comp>able to ?is8 7#g7 ,9 consequ5ce ( all ?is1 ,jesus is 9 fact ! only p]son 9 ! hi/ory ( ! race :o c call out absolute tru/4 ,z little *ildr51 we knew some?+ ( :at x meant to h complete tru/4 ,!re 7 a few ye>s :5 x seem$ to u t !re 0 no?+ 9 ei!r p[] or "* t 0 n true ( our fa!rs & mo!rs4 ,we soon lo/ su* tru/1 ev5 z *ildr54 ,is !re any way back to ! *ildlike _s8 ,let u pond] ^! gold5 words ( ,h]rmann3 ,! *ildlike _s c only arise )9 u :5 our exp]i5ce is ! same z a *ild's2 9 o!r words1 :5 we meet ) a p]sonal life :i* compels u to tru/ x )\t res]ve4 ,only ! p]son ( ,jesus c ar\se su* tru/ 9 a man :o has awak5$ to moral self-consci\sness4 ,if su* a man surr5d]s himself to any?+ or any "o else1 he ?r[s away n only 8 tru/1 b himself4 ,!re has be5 "o life liv$ on e>?1 9 ^: h&s "o may put himself ) absolute confid5ce & h no fe> z to ! result4 ,jesus1 & ,jesus alone1 c call out absolute tru/4 7#h7 ,moreov]1 ,jesus is ! only life ev] liv$ among m5 9 :om ,god c]ta9ly f9ds u1 & 9 :om we c]ta9ly f9d ,god4 ,&1 once aga91 ,i am n n[ ask+ :e!r "o is able to come to any !ory ( ! nature ( ,*ri/4 ,t is a matt] ( comp>ative indiff]5ce4 ,! great fact is ?is3 ,t !re has be5 liv$ among u m5 su* a life t1 if a man w simply put himself 9 ! pres5ce ( x & /ay !re1 he w h br\ght home to him ) unmi/akable conviction ! fact t ,god is1 & is t\*+ him & t he is t\*+ ,god2 t1 c\pl$ ) su* a s5se z he nev] _h be=e ( 8 s91 !re w be also ! s5se ( =giv5ess & reconciliation ) ,god1 & s1 su* evid5ce ( ! contact ( ,god ) 8 life z he c f9d n[h]e else4 ,s ,h>nack believes3 ,:5 ,god & ev]y?+ t is sacr$ ?reat5 to disappe> 9 ! d>kness1 or our doom is pron\nc$2 :5 ! mighty =ces ( inexorable nature seem to ov]:elm u1 & ! b\nds ( good & evil to dissolve2 :51 weak & we>y1 we despair ( f9d+ ,god at all 9 ?is dismal _w1--x is !n t ! p]sonality ( ,*ri/ may save u4 7#i7 ,& all ?is means1 f9ally1 t ,jesus is = u ! ideal realiz$4 ,let n ! commonplac5ess ( ! words rob u ( _! mean+4 ,! fact is f> en\gh f ! commonplace4 ,philosophy mu/ always tell u t we h no "r to expect any:]e a realiz$ ideal1 except 9 ! absolute :ole ( ?+s4 ,c]ta9ly1 we nev] f9d 9 any ( ! inf]ior sph]es a fully realiz$ ideal4 ,:at does x mean1 !n1 t 9 ?is highe/ ( all sph]es1 ! sph]e ( ! moral & spiritual life1 we h ! ideal realiz$2 t our v highe/ vision is a fact8 ,:at is !re t "o w\ld add to1 :at1 t "o w\ld take away f1 ! life ( ,*ri/1 t x might be m completely ?an x is ! ideal realiz$8 ,b ,!e1 b ,!e1 ,o ,sov]eign ,se] ( "t1 ,b ,!e1 ,o poet's ,poet1 wisdom's tongue1 ,b ,!e1 ,o man's be/ ,man1 ,o love's be/ ,love1 ,o p]fect life 9 p]fect labor writ1 ,o all m5's ,comrade1 ,s]vant1 ,k+ or ,prie/1-- ,:at if or yet1 :at mole1 :at flaw1 :at lapse1 ,:at lea/ defect or %ad[ ( defect1 ,:at rumor1 tattl$ by an enemy1 ,( inf]5ce loose1 :at lack ( grace ,ev5 9 torture's grasp1 or sleep's1 or dea?'s1 ,oh1 :at amiss may ,i =give 9 ,!e1 ,jesus1 good ,p>agon1 ?\ cry/al ,*ri/8 #d4 ,*ri/'s ,d\ble ,uniqu5ess4--,x seems h>dly possible to d ju/ice to ! facts n[ pass$ 9 review1 )\t recogniz+1 at lea/1 t !y po9t to a d\ble uniqu5ess on ! "p ( ,*ri/ 9 8 relation to ,god1 reflect$ 9 8 own language conc]n+ himself & 9 ! spontane\s confessions ( 8 disciples 9 all times4 ,he alone1 9 ! emphatic s5se1 is ! ,son4 ,! contra/s betwe5 ,*ri/ & o!r m51 :i* ! simple facts ( ! life & consci\sness ( ,*ri/ h compell$ u to make1 naturally1 !n1 dem& recognition f ?\ght4 ,! recognition ( ! facts is ! vital matt]1 b ?\ght c h>dly see !m unmov$4 ,h[ are we to ?9k ( ,*ri/8 ,) cle> remembrance1 n[1 t ,*ri/ian tea*+ itself insi/s ^u ! k9%ip ( ,god & m52 t absolute b>ri]s1 !re=e1 _c any:]e be set up2 t a revelation unrelat$ to all else c\ld be no revelation2 & t ,*ri/ himself (t5 po9t$ out ! lik5ess betwe5 8 own life & "w & ^? ( 8 disciples2--/ill we may n ignore actual diff]5ces1 & mu/ hone/ly /rive to d ju/ice to !m 9 our own conception ( ,*ri/4 ,"o may n =get t !re is mu* "h t we c h>dly hope ev] to fa?om2 & t into ?is secret ( ,*ri/'s relation to ! ,fa!r !ology has (t5 tri$ to press ) a precision ( /atem5t t 0 q beyond its possible k1 & t damag$ r ?an help$ ! religi\s consci\sness2 b "o may try to ?9k 9 simple1 /raight=w>d fa%ion :at ! facts mean4 ,n[ ^! actual & mom5t\s moral & spiritual diff]5ces already po9t$ out seem1 at lea/1 to ass]t1 ,i say1 a g5u9e d\ble uniqu5ess 9 ,*ri/4 ,*ri/'s relation to ,god is absolutely unique1 t is1 9 two s5ses3 9 ! absolutely unique purpose ( ,god conc]n+ him2 9 ! absolutely p]fect response ( ,*ri/ to t purpose4 ,if "o *ooses to use ! language1 he may say1 t ! fir/ uniqu5ess is metaphysical2 ! second1 e?ical4#aja ,fir/1 !n1 ,god has a purpose conc]n+ ,*ri/1 t he has conc]n+ no o!r1 = he purposes to make 9 him 8 supreme self-manife/ation4 ,?is sets him ap>t f all o!rs4 ,8 transc5d5t s5se ( ,god & s5se ( mission only correspond to ! absolute uniqu5ess ( ?is et]nal purpose ( ,god conc]n+ him4 ,we are utt]ly unable to see t !y c\ld be borne by any be+ t we "k z man4 ,he is ! manife/$ ,god--! visible pres5tation ( ! invisible ,god4 ,?is _c be said1 9 ! same s5se1 ( any o!r4 ,n[1 our only adequate /atem5t ( ! inn] reality--! ess5tial mean+--( any be+1 c be giv5 only 9 t]ms ( ! purpose :i* ,god calls t be+ to fulfil4 ,to see1 !n1 t ,god's purpose conc]n+ ,*ri/ is absolutely unique1 & t ,god's purpose is1 to make 9 ,*ri/ ! complete/ possible p]sonal manife/ation ( himself1 is to see t ,*ri/'s ess5tial relation to ! ,fa!r is absolutely 8 own1 un%>$ by any o!r4 ,&1 x may be add$1 !re is no reason :y ?is purpose ( ,god conc]n+ ,*ri/ %\ld n be reg>d$ z an et]nal purpose1 et]nally realiz$4 ,b ,*ri/ is z cle>ly unique 9 8 simply p]fect response to ?is purpose ( ,god4 ,our facts seem to po9t directly to ! conclusion1 t 9 him !re 0 no moral h9drance to ! fullness ( ! revelation ,god w\ld make ?r\gh him4 ,8 life is p]fectly transp>5t1 all[+ ! full glory ( ! "* ( ,god to %9e ?r\gh x4 ,! h>mony ( 8 w ) ,god's w is complete4 ,if x be said t ?is la/ uniqu5ess is1 aft] all1 only diff]5ce 9 degree f o!r m51 x mu/ be answ]$1 fir/1 t degree "h is s va/ z to be practically k9d4 ,?is is ! p]fect ( ,*ri/ set ov] aga9/ ! v>y+ly imp]fect ( all o!r m54 ,moreov]1 to ask "h = diff]5ce 9 k9d 9 any o!r s5se1 is probably to make an un9tellig5t & impossible dem&2 =1 9 ! nature ( ! case1 ! relations involv$ are spiritual & p]sonal1 & !re _c be1 9 /rictness1 9 ! fulfilm5t ( su* relations any real diff]5ces 9 k9d4 #e4 ,! ,increas+ ,s5se ( ,our ,k9%ip ) ,*ri/1 & ( ,8 ,reality4--,side by side ) ?is recognition ( ! nature ( ,*ri/'s uniqu5ess1 !re des]ves to be set1 z ano!r outcome ( ! emphasis ^u conceiv+ ,*ri/ z a p]sonal revelation ( ,god1 ! increas+ s5se ( our k9%ip ) ,*ri/ & ( 8 reality4 ,! connection "h is by no means accid5tal1 ?\gh x may seem almo/ p>adoxical4 ,we h pla9ly come 9 our day to our cle>e/ recognition ( ! div9ity ( ,*ri/ ?r\gh ! s5se ( 8 transc5d5t "*4 ,b revelation 9 "* requires ! reality ( 8 human life4 ,! v r\te1 !re=e1 by :i* we h mo/ c]ta9ly rea*$ our s5se ( ,*ri/'s div9ity1 leads also to an increas+ s5se ( k9%ip ) ,*ri/1 & s ( 8 reality4 ,s long z we seem$ driv5 to conceive ! div9ity ( ,*ri/ 9 t]ms t _h no relation & no mean+ = human life1 j s long mu/ he seem to u to be really mov+ 9 ano!r _w & to take on ! unreality ( t o!r _w q hidd5 f u4 ,b n[ ,*ri/'s life has mean+2 we c ent] into x & feel t x is real4 ,) all its transc5d5ce1 ! life does n move n[ simply 9 ! sph]e ( ! my/]i\s4 ,x is no unreal drama1 no play-/ruggle1--utt]ly fail+ to meet our real moral & spiritual ne$s4 ,lea/ ( all1 9 ?is supreme "w = man1 c ! reveal+ life be only a %[4 ,x feels real4 ,x is real4 ,&1 ) cle> s5se ( ! inevitable inadequacy ( ! analogy1 we /ill re/ confid5tly 9 ! conviction t ,god's relation to ,*ri/ may be be/ conceiv$ aft] ! analogy ( ! relation ( ! ,_s ( ,god to our spirits2 & t1 :5 we try to press beyond t1 we are attempt+ to rise into t sph]e ( a suppos$ supra-p]sonal1 = :i* we h no possible organ ( vision1 & :]e1 !re=e1 we are ?9k+ n m1 b less1 truly4#ajb ,) ?is s5se ( ! reality ( ! p]sonal1 spiritual life ( ,*ri/1 !re naturally comes home to u ! appropriat5ess & practicability ( 8 ideals4 ,!y are se5 to belong to u m surely1 & prop]ly to make dem&s ^u u4 ,x is1 probably1 n too mu* to say t1 "u ! influ5ce ( ! social consci\sness1 !re has be5 a def9ite1 gr[+ approa* to ,*ri/'s way ( ?9k+1 & to 8 ideal ( life4 ,?is means a consci\sness increas+ly ,*ri/ian 9 tone1 &1 !re=e1 9 turn1 increas+ly bett] able to int]pret ! tea*+ & life ( ,*ri/1 & s to give promise ( a m ,*ri/ian !ology4 ,none ( u1 probably1 are fully consci\s ( ! m subtle inconsi/5cies ( ev5 our be/ !ological ?9k+1 :5 measur$ by a completely ,*ri/ian _s4 ,at lea/1 ) ! insi/5ce ^u ,*ri/ z a p]sonal reveal] ( a p]sonal ,god1 x mu/ become m true t ! mean+ ( all t]ms = ! "w ( ,*ri/ %all be m cle>ly reasonable1 m consi/5tly e?ical1 & m completely spiritual2 & !n ! imm$iate root+ ( ,*ri/ian !ology 9 ! ,*ri/ian religion c be se5 & felt4 ,,iii4 ,,! ,,recognition ,,( ,,! ,,p]sonal ,,9 ,,god ,! s5se ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son mu/ lead to ! special recognition ( ! p]sonal n only 9 man & 9 ,*ri/1 b also 9 ,god4 ,we h already se5 reasons = believ+ t ! social consci\sness is peculi>ly b\nd /rongly to emphasize ! p]sonality ( ,god1 z 9 ! end absolutely ess5tial to its own ju/ification4 ,! social consci\sness repres5ts an e?ical movem5t t c live only 9 ! atmosph]e ( ! p]sonal4 #a4 ,! ,/eady ,c>ry+ ?r\gh ( ! ,completely ,p]sonal 9 ! ,conception ( ,god4 ,gu>d+ ! ,conception4--,?is pressure ( ! social consci\sness t[>d an imp]ative fai? 9 ! fully p]sonal ,god is mo/ valuable1 z (fsett+ ! t5d5cy 9 _m qu>t]s t[>d a sci5tific or ev5 ideali/ic pan!ism or monism t is q imp]sonal4 ,=1 9 ! language ( ,pr(essor ,h[ison1 ! v quality ( p]sonality is1 t a p]son is a be+ :o recognizes o!rs z hav+ a reality z unque/ionable z 8 own1 & :o ?us sees himself z a memb] ( a moral republic1 /&+ to o!r p]sons 9 an immutable relation%ip ( reciprocal duties & rights1 himself end[$ ) dignity1 & ackn[l$g+ ! dignity ( all ! re/4#ajc ,z ?is is prem95tly ! _s ( ! social consci\sness1 x is pla9 t we h 9 ! social consci\sness an increas+ly p[]ful motive = gu>d+ ! full p]sonality ( ,god4 ,x ne$s p>ticul>ly to be not$1 t we "k no def9ite supra-p]sonal4 ,pan!ism or any imp]sonal monism is =c$1 !re=e1 :5 x leaves ! p]sonal conception ( ,god1 to take a l[] l9e ( developm5t1 n a high]4 ,! result is1 t x is oblig$ to d5y ! highe/ attributes to ,god1 & !n1 z ,br[n+ is fond ( argu+1 man /eps at once into ! place ( ,god4 ,m5 _c p]man5tly rema9 satisfi$ ) a philosophical view1 ( :i* t is ! logical outcome4 ,c]ta9ly1 su* a view c get no support f ! social consci\sness1 ) its deep conviction ( ! supreme value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son4 ,moreov]1 x is n to be =gott51 9 e/imat+ ! value ( a cosmic monism1 t :at ! cosmological really means1 e?ically & religi\sly1 to a p1 mu/ always dep5d ^u _! social ideals4 ,! natural 9 itself conta9s no comm&4 ,= any effective vital int]pretation1 !re=e1 ev5 ( its imp]sonal ,absolute1 pan!ism is con/antly ?r[n back ^u ! p]sonal4 ,only a cle>1 /eady c>ry+ ?r\gh by !ology ( ! completely p]sonal 9 its conception ( ,god c ultimately satisfy ?is s5se ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son4 ,pr(essor ,na% does n speak too /rongly :5 he says3 ,to fulfil h] function ! *ur* mu/ develop ! doctr9e ( a ,div9e ,p]sonality4 ,%e has n always be5 true to x 9 ! pa/4 ,too (t51 by h] sacram5ts1 by h] !ology1 by h] !ory ( inspiration1 %e has glorifi$ ! imp]sonal4#ajd ,n[1 su* an attempt1 x is p]haps wor? say+ once m1 is n to be ?\ght ( z a runn+ away f a ?or\gh-go+ metaphysical inve/igation4 ,x r takes ! gr\nd1 indicat$ 9 ! e>li] discussion1 ( :at may be call$1 9 ,pr(essor ,h[ison's language1 p]sonal idealism2 & holds t _s1 p]son1 is = u ! ultimate metaphysical fact3 ! "o reality to :i* we h imm$iate access2 ! reality f :i* all our metaphysical notions are orig9ally d]iv$2 &1 9 consequ5ce1 ! "o reality :i* we c take z ! key to ! und]/&+ ( all else4 ,& x believes t ev5 ess5ce & sub/ance1 ! great words ( ! old metaphysics1 c be really und]/ood only z !y are int]pret$ 9 p]sonal t]ms4 ,ultimately1 !ology w\ld hold1 ?is w\ld mean ! int]pretation ( ! ess5ce ( ?+s 9 t]ms ( ! purpose ( ,god conc]n+ !m--:at he meant !m to be4 ,9 ! attempt1 !n1 cle>ly & /eadily to c>ry ?r\gh ! conception ( ,god z completely p]sonal1 !ology may well gu>d c>efully c]ta9 po9ts4 ,9 ! fir/ place1 !ology does n mean to transf] to ,god human limitations2 r1 x conceives him to be ! only complete p]sonality ) p]fect self-consci\sness & full fre$om1 no "p ( ^: be+ is 9 any degree =eign to himself4 ,nor1 9 ! second place1 does x mean to =get t ! p]sonal relations 9 :i* ,god /&s to o!r p]sons are unique1 & t1 9 ?ree def9ite respects3 t conviction ( ! love ( ,god1 z ( no o!r1 mu/ und]lie1 z a great necess>y assumption1 all our ?9k+ & all our liv+2 t ,god is himself ! s\rce ( ! moral con/itution ( man1 :i* mu/ ?us be reg>d$ z an expression ( ! p]sonal w ( ,god1 & ! p]sonal relation to ,god s h univ]sal moral implications su* z no o!r p]sonal relation c h2 & 9 t ,god is su* 9 8 univ]sal love = all1 t x is impossible to come into "r p]sonal relation to ,god1 & n at ! same "t come into "r relation to all moral be+s4#aje #b4 ,god is ,always ! ,completely ,p]sonal ,god4--,if1 n[1 !ology is to d ju/ice to ! dem&s ( ! social consci\sness = a full recognition ( ! p]sonal 9 ,god1 x mu/ see cle>ly t ,god is always ! completely p]sonal ,god4 ,c]ta9 conclusions1 n always admitt$1 are believ$ to foll[ f ?is position4 7#a7 ,! ,consequ5t ,relation ( ,god to ,et]nal ,tru?s4--,9 ! fir/ place1 !re c be no sph]e ( et]nal tru?s1 ?\ght ( z ei!r creat$ outright by ! w ( ,god1 or z exi/+ ( !mselves indep5d5tly ( ,god & only to be recogniz$ by him4 ,! difficulty is n m]ely t at lea/ "o ( ^! views w\ld put ,god 9 ! same dep5d5t relation to tru? z we f9ite be+s1 & ?us practically put a ,god above ,god4 ,nor is ! difficulty m]ely t x is impossible to ?9k ! real exi/5ce ( su* a sph]e ( et]nal tru?1 s9ce tru?s or laws c be said to exi/ only 9 "o ( two ways3 ei!r z ! actual mode ( action ( reality1 or z ! p]ception & =mulation 9 an obs]v+ m9d ( t mode ( action4 ,& ^! difficulties are bo? suffici5tly s]i\s4 ,b1 f our pres5t po9t ( view1 ! great difficulty is1 t try+ to conceive ,god z ei!r creat+ or com+ to ! recognition ( tru?1 assumes1 z ,lotze po9ts out1 a fragm5t>y ,god1 a ,god = :om tru? is n yet4 ,x assumes an action ( ! w ( ,god ap>t f 8 reason1 t is1 a ,god n yet completely p]sonal1 n yet ! full ,god ( tru? & "*4 ,a ,god = :om tru? & duty are n yet1 is c]ta9ly no true p]son4 ,mo/1 if n all1 ( our metaphysical puzzles connect$ ) ! relation ( ,god to :at we call et]nal tru?s1 seem to me to gr[ out ( ?is ?\ght ( an ess5tially fragm5t>y ,god4 ,we are driv51 consequ5tly1 to a d5ial ( bo? ! ,scoti/ & ,?omi/ positions1 z ord9>ily conceiv$4 ,x is true nei!r t ! tru? is true & ! good is good because ,god wills x1 nor yet t ,god wills ! true because x is true & ! good because x is good4 ,bo? views alike assume ! possibility ( a fragm5t>y ,god1 a ,god = :om at "s "t tru? & goodness 7 n yet4 ,b ,god has always be5 ! completely p]sonal ,god ( tru? & love1 nev] a b>e w & nev] a b>e intellect4 ,h5ce1 nei!r z an indep5d5t object to be recogniz$1 nor yet z ! ext]nal product ( 8 w1 c we ?9k ( ! realm ( et]nal tru? & goodness4 ,we mu/ r say1 ,god alone is ! et]nal be+ & absolute s\rce ( all1 always complete 9 ! p]fection ( 8 p]sonality2 &1 !re=e1 :at we call ! et]nal tru?s are only ! et]nal modes ( ,god's actual activity4 ,?is alone seems to ! writ] to give a ?or\gh-go+ !i/ic view1 free f self-contradiction4#ajf 7#b7 ,et]nal ,creation4--,b1 fur!r1 if ,god is to be ?\ght z always ! completely p]sonal ,god1 we are l$1 also1 imm$iately to ! doctr9e ( et]nal creation4 ,if ,god has _h always a completely p]sonal life1 8 entire be+ mu/ h be5 always 9 ex]cise4 ,c we really ?9k ( su* a ,god z simply quiesc5t1 & n z always active8 ,is n 8 activity involv$ 9 8 complete p]sonality8 ,! ?\ght ( 8 possible quiesc5ce arises probably out ( an unconsci\s1 b nev]!less unw>rant$1 transf] to ,god ( our f9ite sep>ation ( w & act4 ,b ,god is "h1 too1 no fragm5t>y ,god2 he has always be5 ! completely p]sonal ,god1 always act+4 ,a second consid]ation c>ries u to ! same conclusion4 ,!ologians h felt t !y h made a di/9ct /ep 9 advance 9 trac+ creation to love 9 ,god1 z1 = example1 ,pr9cipal ,fairbairn does4 ,b ?is gives no real help z an explanation ( creation z beg9n+ 9 "t2 = "o mu/ at once ask1 ,0 n ! love ( ,god et]nal1 & if ?is 7 ! real reason lead+ to creation1 mu/ n1 !n1 creation be et]nal8 ,s f> z ,i am able to see1 !re is no?+ to lose & mu* to ga9 9 cle>ness & satisfactor9ess ( ?\ght 9 a frank acceptance ( ! doctr9e ( et]nal creation4 ,n1 ( c\rse1 9 ! s5se ( an et]nal dualism1 9 ! s5se ( ! ?\ght ( an et]nity ( matt] set ov] aga9/ ,god1 b 9 ! cle> s5se ( ! et]nal creative activity ( ,god4 ,& to su* a doctr9e ( et]nal creation1 ! social consci\sness1 9 its emphasis on ! completely p]sonal1 seems to me to lead4 7#c7 ,! ,unity & ,un*angeabl5ess ( ,god4--,&1 once m1 if ,god is always ! completely p]sonal ,god1 we %all conceive 8 own unity n z monoton\s self-id5tity1 b only z consi/5cy ( mean+4 ,we %all n1 !re=e1 transf] to ,god1 plum+ ourselves mean:ile ^u a highly philosophical view1 ! me*anical un*angeabl5ess ( a rock2 b we %all be r conc]n$ ) ! consi/5cy ( 8 "* & ! un*angeabl5ess ( 8 lov+ w1 :i* w\ld be ! v reasons = 8 *ang+1 adapt+ attitude t[>d 8 *ang+ *ildr54 ,f ?is po9t ( view1 too1 ! sph]e ( law & ! sph]e ( ! actual1 w seem to u1 necess>ily1 to root 9 ! sph]e ( ! ideal2 ! is & ! mu/1 to re/ 9 ! ought2 ?\gh we may n hope to trace ! connections 9 detail4 ,9 a ,god1 !n1 :o is a completely h>moni\s p]son1 nev] act+ 9 fragm5t>y fa%ion1 ^: w & ^: reason & ^: love are nev] at cross purposes--only 9 su* a ,god c ! _w f9d its adequate & unify+ s\rce4 ,! _w itself has real unity only 9 s f> z x is ! expression ( ! consi/5cy ( mean+ ( ! purpose ( ,god conc]n+ x4 ,& ?is same ?\ght ( ! consi/5cy ( ! mean+ ( ! purpose ( ,god1 ,i h else:]e argu$1#ajg saves u f ! necessity ( a self-contradictory conception ( ! miracul\s or sup]natural1 by its recognition ( ! dom9ant spiritual ord]4 ,x also enables u to see1 ) ,pr(essor ,na%1 if ! ^w p]sonal is giv5 suffici5t bread?1 t ! true sup]natural is ! p]sonal1 & :]esoev] ! p]sonal is discov]$1 :e!r 9 ! life ( consci5ce or ! life ( reason1 :e!r 9 ,israel or ,greece1 !re ! sup]natural is discov]$4 ,^u ?is conception ( ! sup]natural z ! p]sonal1 apologetics mu/ f\nd ! claims ( ,*ri/ianity4 ,! div9e & ! human p]sonality /& )9 ',nature1' t is1 )9 ! total ( be+4 ,b !y bo?1 ! human z well z ! div9e1 transc5d ! scope & rea* ( visible ,nature4#ajh 7#d7 ,! ,limitations ( ! ,conception ( ,imman5ce4--,inde$1 x ought to be cle>ly recogniz$ on all sides by ^? :o believe 9 religion at all1 t we _c s exclusively emphasize ! imman5ce ( ,god1 z _m are n[ do+1 & h a ,god at all1 beyond ! f9ite manife/ations4 ,:5 ! matt] is s conceiv$1 !re is no real p]sonal ,god ) :om !re c be any p]sonal communion4 ,religion1 ?us1 9 any ord9>y s5se ( x1 is by ?is process made simply impossible2 ,positivism is ! only logical result1 & ,fr$]ic ,h>rison becomes ! "o sole1 cle>-sight$ prophet among u1 a lone voice cry+ 9 ! wild]ness4 ,su* an outcome is possible = any1 because1 & 9 s f> z1 !y are n true to ! social consci\sness 9 its dem& = ! completely p]sonal ,god1 :o1 9 ,m>t9eau's language1 is a g5u9ely free _s4#aji #c4 ,deep5+ ! ,?\ght ( ! ,fa!rhood ( ,god4--,b ! influ5ce ( ! social consci\sness 9 its deep5+ s5se ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son1 ( obligation & ( love1 n only t5ds to insi/ ^u ! completely p]sonal 9 ! conception ( ,god1 b also t5ds to deep5 our ?\ght ( ! ,fa!rhood ( ,god4 7#a7 ,hi/ory no ,m]e ,natural ,process4--,no m]e on-go+ ( an unfeel+ ,absolute1 :atev] "n be giv5 x1 w ev] satisfy ! social consci\sness4 ,! new s5se ( ! sorr[ & e?ical mean+ ( ! hi/orical process dem&s1 9 ! fir/ place1 t hi/ory %all n be reg>d$ z a m]e necessitat$ developm5t1 b a movem5t 9 :i* m5 effectively cop]ate1 nev] m consci\sly & cle>ly ?an to-day2 & secondly1 x dem&s a ,god :o c>es1 :o loves1 :o guides4 ,hi/ory _c be a m]e holocau/ to ,god4 7#b7 ,god1 ! ,great ,s]vant4--,r1 z we saw 9 ! f\r? *apt]1 ! social consci\sness requires a ,god ^: purpose %all completely support its own purpose1 & s requires u1 ) ,fairbairn1 to put ,fa!rhood be=e ,sov]eignty1 n ,sov]eignty be=e ,fa!rhood1 & requires u def9itely to conceive ,god aft] ,*ri/1 z self-giv+ m9i/]+ love4 ,x is "o ( ! anomalies ( ,*ri/ian hi/ory1 t ! *ur* has be5 s sl[ to ca/ (f a pagan conception ( ,god1 & to come to a truly ,*ri/ian view4 ,we c h>dly take 9 ,*ri/'s own revelation ( ,god )\t "s %>+ 9 8 sympa?y = m54 ,"s exp]i5ce ( our own is ne$$ to unlock ! revelation4 ,&1 s1 ! /eady deep5+ ( ! social consci\sness1 bo? z to ! value ( ! p]son & z to ! s5se ( obligation1 has c]ta9ly help$ u to see t if ,god is to be highe/1 he mu/ be love1 & ?us ! great s]vant1 ) transc5d5t obligations1 ent]+ really & sympa!tically into all our life4 7#c7 ,no ,div9e ,arbitr>9ess4--,) su* a conception ( ,god1 e trace ( arbitr>9ess disappe>s4 ,calv9ism1 h[ev] /r5u\sly insi/$ ^u1 means a f> diff]5t ?+ = any man :o really feels ! pressure ( ! mod]n social consci\sness1 :o has come to "s real s5se ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son1 t is1 :o really sees ,god 9 ,*ri/4 ,! great tru? ( ,calv9ism1 t ,god is ! ultimate s\rce ( all1 0 p]haps nev] m secure ?an to-day2 b t ,god1 :o is ! absolute & ultimate s\rce ( all1 is ! fully p]sonal ,god1 ^: w is nev] divorc$ f 8 reason & love1 :o kn[s no su* ab/raction z a b>e & empty omnipot5ce )\t cont5t or direction1 b :o is himself always liv+ love4 ,! bane ( mu* s-call$ ,calv9ism is 9 ?is supposition ( a fragm5t>y ,god1 l a motion )\t direction or rate ( spe$4 ,arbitr>y decrees are conceivable only f su* a fragm5t>y ,god1 n yet full & complete 9 8 reality & p]sonality4 7#d7 ,! ,passibility ( ,god4--,x w\ld seem1 also1 t any vital def5se ( ! ,fa!rhood ( ,god1 requir$ by ! social consci\sness1 involves fur!r ! frank admission ( ! passibility ( ,god1 :e!r x has ! look ( an anci5t h]esy or n4 ,we mu/ unhesitat+ly admit t1 )\t :i* ,god c be no real ,god to u4 ,!ology has no fals] idea ?an t ( ! impassibility ( ,god4 ,if he is capable ( sorr[1 he is capable ( suff]+1 & 7 he )\t ! capacity = ei!r he w\ld be )\t any feel+ ( ! evil ( s9 or ! mis]y ( man4 ,! v tru? t comes by ,jesus ,*ri/ may be said to be summ$ up 9 ! passibility ( ,god4#aaj ,) ! gr[+ s5sitiv5ess ( ! social consci\sness1 ! problem ( suff]+ & ( s9 presses increas+ly1 & itself almo/ compels ! ass]tion ( ! passibility ( ,god4 ,no?+ less c satisfy our he>ts1 nor inde$ all[ u to keep our rev]5ce = ,god4 ,c]ta9ly1 ) ! increas+ly cle> vision1 :i* ! social consci\sness is giv+ u1 ( sympa!tic1 unselfi%1 def9itely self-sacrific+1 lov+ lead]%ip ev5 among m51 we %all n re/ satisfi$ ) less 9 ,god4 ,we mu/ h a suff]+1 seek+1 lov+ ,god2 because our ,fa!r1 suff]+ 9 our s91 be>+ z a burd5 ! s9 ( ea*1 & n satisfi$ :ile "o *ild turns away2 no m]e on-look]1 b 9 all our afflictions1 himself afflict$4 ,! cross ( ,*ri/1 !n1 is only an hone/ %[+ ( ! actual facts ( ,god's seek+1 suff]+ love4 #d4 ,z to ! ,doctr9e ( a ,social ,tr9ity4--,"o inf]5ce = !ology widely drawn f ! social consci\sness1 x ought 9 fairness1 p]haps1 to be said1 seems to me unju/ifi$1--! doctr9e ( a s-call$ ,social ,tr9ity4 ,"o mu/ "q ! con/ant cool assumption made 9 ^! discussions ( a social ,tr9ity1 t ?is view is ! only alt]native to :at is call$ an ab/ract simplicity4 ,9 any case1 "o w\ld suppose1 we mu/ h 9 ,god all ! ri*ness & complexity ( a complete p]sonal life1 fre$ f ! limitations ( f9ite p]sonality4 ,some?+ ( ! mu* t t involves we h be5 try+ to po9t out4 ,"h c]ta9ly is no ab/ract simplicity4 ,moreov]1 ! conception ( a social ,tr9ity1 s f> z ! writ] c see1 c>ries u inevitably to a tri!ism ( ! mo/ unmi/akable k9d4 ,social involves full p]sonality4 ,no?+ requires m complete p]sonality ?an love1 :i* ! view affirms to exi/ betwe5 ! p]sons ( ! imman5t ,tr9ity1 betwe5 ! di/9ctions 9 ! v ,godhead4 ,! relations ( ,*ri/ to ,god 71 ( c\rse1 di/9ctly & def9itely p]sonal2 b x mu/ n be =gott5 t we are n p]mitt$1 on any c>eful !ological view1 to transf] ^! directly to ! imman5t relations ( ! ,godhead4 ,! di/9ction drawn by ,dr4 ,w4 ,n4 ,cl>ke1#aaa betwe5 ! doctr9e ( ! biblical ,tr9ity & ! doctr9e ( ! ,triunity1 ,i c\nt ( decid$ value2 b aft] "o has made ! di/9ction1 "o may d\bt ! value ( ! contribution made by ! doctr9e ( ! ,triunity4 ,! really imman5t relations ( ! ,godhead are necess>ily hidd5 f u1 & are1 also1 s f> z ! writ] c see1 )\t e?ical or religi\s significance = u1 except 9 ! way ( possible injury ?r\gh sub/itut+ "s suppos$ altoge!r my/]i\s & incompreh5sibly sacr$1 = ! well-kn[n & truly sacr$ %[n 9 ! e?ical relations ( common life4 ,! doctr9e ( ! ,triunity seems to h be5 orig9ally int5d$ to enable ! *ur* to hold ! div9ity ( ,*ri/4 ,if we n[ get at t & hold t f q a diff]5t po9t ( view1 ! old] way becomes less ess5tial4 ,we mu/1 inde$1 keep ! anci5t treasure1 b we ne$ n keep x 9 ! same anci5t *e/4 ,none ( u--n ! mo/ or?odox--really f9d ! reasons = hold+ ! div9ity ( ,*ri/ 9 ! doctr9e ( ! ,triunity4 ,x is int]e/+ to obs]ve h[ widely sep>at$ f ! doctr9e ( ! ,triunity are ! consid]ations :i* really move m5 to fai? 9 ! div9ity ( ,*ri/4 ,t doctr9e is1 at ! v mo/1 only our philosophical supplem5t int5d$ to br+ t1 :i* on o!r gr\nds we h come to believe1 into unity ) our ?\ght ( ,god4 ,b1 at lea/1 we mu/ s conceive ! div9ity ( ,*ri/1 z n to get two or ?ree ,gods4 ,& a ,social ,tr9ity does n seem to me to avoid t1 except 9 t]ms4 ,h[ev]1 !re=e1 we are to solve our problem1 we are n to take t way out4 ,:at ,dr4 ,cl>ke calls ! biblical doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity1 on ! o!r h&1 seems to me to conta9 ! v he>t ( ,*ri/ianity1 :atev] philosophical !ory we put b5ea? x2 & x became1 !re=e1 z express$ 9 ! baptismal & b5$iction =mulas1 ! great daily confession ( ! *ur*1 s9ce x /rongly expresses t ( :i* we h be5 speak+1--! liv+ love ( ,god1 a life ( absolutely self-giv+ love1 ( et]nal m9i/ry4 ,! biblical ,tr9ity is1 9 tru?1 :at x has sometimes be5 call$1 ! tr9ity ( r$emption2 &1 = me1 directly emphasizes ! great facts ( r$emption4 ,"h !re are ?ree great facts3 ,fir/1 ! ,fa!rhood ( ,god1 t ,god is 9 8 v be+ ,fa!r1 ,love1 self-manife/+ z light1 self-giv+ z life1 self-communicat+1 p\r+ himself out into ! life ( 8 *ildr51 wi%+ to %>e 8 highe/ life ) !m1 e "o4 ,second1 ! concrete1 unmi/akable revelation ( ! ,fa!r 9 ,*ri/1 reveal$ 9 full e?ical p]fection1 z an actual fact to be kn[n & exp]i5c$2 no long] an unkn[n1 hidd51 or only p>tially & imp]fectly reveal$ ,god1 b a real1 liv+ ,god ( "*1 c\nt+ z a real1 appreciable1 b fully spiritual fact 9 ! real _w4 ,&1 ?ird1 ! ,fa!r reveal+ himself by 8 ,_s 9 e individual he>t t op5s itself to him1 9 a con/ant1 intimate1 div9e association1 :i* yet is nev] obtrusive1 b rev]5t ( ! man's p]sonality1 mak+ possible to e man ! ideal conditions ( ! ri*e/ life4 ,:at metaphysical !ory we put "u t confession ( our full ,*ri/ian fai?1 does n seem to me to be ( prime importance4 ,m5 may c\nt x ( great importance2 b x c h>dly be ( fir/ importance1 s9ce1 at ! v mo/1 only ! beg9n+s ( su* a !ory c be f\nd 9 ! great ,new ,te/am5t confession ( ,*ri/4 #e4 ,prem95t ,rev]5ce = ,p]sonality1 ,*>act]iz+ all ,god's ,relations ) ,m54--,b ! v he>t ( ! conviction1 on ! "p ( ! social consci\sness1 ( ! value & sacr$ness ( ! p]son1 is its rev]5ce = p]sonality2 & ?is ?\ght has mu* significance = !ology1 =1 if ?is judgm5t ( ! social consci\sness is ju/ifi$1 x mu/ be reg>d$ z prem95tly *>act]iz+ ,god 9 all 8 relations ) m54 7#a7 ,reflect$ 9 ,*ri/4--,:51 9 ! fir/ place1 we turn to ,*ri/ z ! supreme revelation ( ,god1 we _c fail to see t ?is rev]5ce = ! p]sonal m>ks e /ep he takes4 ,x beg9s1 ( c\rse1 9 ! priceless value :i* ,*ri/ gives to ea* p]son1 z a *ild ( ! liv+1 lov+ ,fa!r4 ,& x seems to det]m9e 8 :ole me?od ) 8 g5]ation & ) 8 disciples4 ,x is %[n 9 ! initial battle 9 ! temptations1 z to ! =m 8 "w 0 to take1 & z to ! means to be employ$4 ,!re 0 "h1 z we h se51 f ! />t an absolute subord9ation ( all unspiritual & une?ical me?ods 9 ! build+ ( ! k+dom4 ,!re is to be no ov]-rid+ ( ! free p]sonality any:]e4 ,he fac$ successively ! temptations to place 8 dep5d5ce on ! m]e meet+ ( m5's mat]ial ne$s--! k+dom by bread2 ! temptation to place 8 dep5d5ce on t :i* appeal$ mo/ /rongly to ! ori5tal m9d--! use ( wond]-work+ p[]--! k+dom by m>vel or ec/asy2 ! temptation to place 8 dep5d5ce on =ce--! k+dom by =ce4 ,b ,*ri/ sees cle>ly t ,god is no m]e suppli] ( bread2 t ,god is no m]e wond]-work]1 no m]e giv] ( wond]ful exp]i5ces2 & t ,god is n a tyrant to conqu] by =ce4 ,ev]y:]e1 !re=e1 he sets aside :atev] may ov]ride ! free p]sonality4 ,he w\ld replace all ! attractive & seem+ly rapid me?ods ( ! k+dom by bread1 ! k+dom by m>vel1 & ! k+dom by =ce1 ) ! sl[ & t$i\s & co/ly b rev]5t me?od ( ! spiritual k+dom by spiritual means1 ! k+dom ( ,god by ,god's way--( a tru/ freely won1 a humility spontane\sly aris+1 a love gladly giv54 ,he c take no pleasure 9 any k+dom b "o ( free p]sons4 ,9 ! same way1 9 8 deal+s ) ! inn] circle ( 8 disciples1 !re seems to h be5 ! mo/ scrupul\s reg>d = _! own ne$$ initiative4 ,he app>5tly makes no cle> ann\ncem5t ( himself z ,messiah ev5 to ! disciples until late 9 8 public m9i/ry1 &1 !n1 only aft] !y h be5 br\ght1 ?r\gh weeks1 if n mon?s1 ( unusually close p]sonal contact & impression ( 8 _s1 into _! own confession ( him4 ,he /eadily abjures1 t is1 all dogmatism ab\t himself1 & leads !m along by a purely spiritual me?od to a confession ( him1 t may be truly _! own4 ,!re is no pil+ up ( pro(-texts f ! ,old ,te/am5t1 to %[ t he is ! ,messiah4 ,he seems nev] to h attempt$ any pro( ) 8 disciples4 ,inde$1 he seems purposely to h *os5 ! r ambigu\s title1 ! ,son ( ,man1 t m5 might be left free to come by moral *oice to him4 ,! surpass+ly significant fact1 t ,*ri/'s *ief "w 9 ! e/abli%m5t ( ! k+dom ( ,god1 z seems to me beyond d\bt1 0 8 p]sonal association ) a few m52 t1 probably1 a full ?ird1 p]haps m1 ( 8 v brief s-call$ public m9i/ry 0 tak5 up ) a p]iod ( def9itely s\ght comp>ative retirem5t ) ! inn] circle ( ! disciples--all ?is po9ts to ! same recognition ( ! fundam5tal importance 9 ,*ri/'s eyes ( su* a rev]5ce = ! p]son4 ,! k+dom ( ,god c be f\nd$ only by ! full w9n+ ( free p]sons into 8 disciple%ip4 ,! k+dom is fir/ & la/ a k+dom ( free p]sons1 9 ,dr4 ,mul=d's language1 always a ,republic ( ,god4 ,pr(essor ,peabody's emphasis on ! ess5tial importance ( ,*ri/'s individualism1 t ,jesus approa*es life f )91 ?r\gh ! inspiration ( ! individual1#aab x ne$ n be said1 goes ^u ! same assumption ( ,*ri/'s rev]5ce = ! p]son4 ,9 8 really public m9i/ry ! same _s appe>s2 = ,jesus seems to me "h con/antly to be /&+ ) a k9d ( moral %udd] betwe5 ! _s ( contempt 9 ! ,ph>isees & ,sadducees1 & ! outrag$ p]sonality ( ! common p1 ev5 ( ! publicans & s9n]s4 ,he feels ! contempt ev5 = ^! lea/1 z a bl[ 9 8 own face4 ,t glimpse :i* ! ,revelation gives u ( ,*ri/ /&+ & knock+ at ! he>t's clos$ door1 is a true picture =ev]more n only ( ! attitude ( ,*ri/'s e>?ly life1 b ( ,god's et]nal relation to u4 ,m5 may ov]-ride & outrage u1 & ev5 ?9k t !y %[ ! m love !reby2 ,god1 nev]4 ,?is pr9ciple1 !n1 we may take z absolutely crucial1 9 our judgm5t ( ,god's deal+s ) u4 7#b7 ,9 ,creation4--,x is fundam5tal ev5 9 creation4 ,! v fact ( ! creation ( p]sons implies x4 ,su* a creation c h no significance1 if1 9 ! language already quot$ f ,h[ison1 ,god's consci\sness is void ( t recognition & rev]5ce ( ! p]sonal initiative ( o!r m9ds :i* is at once ! sign & ! te/ ( ! true p]son4 ,& if love is1 = a mom5t1 to be ?\ght ( z ! motive ( creation1 x requir$ = any satisfaction ( x1 p]sons :o c\ld freely respond to t love4 ,! def9ite be/[al ( ! fateful gift ( moral fre$om1 ) ! practical c]ta9ty ( s9--! creation ( be+s :o c\ld *oose aga9/ him--%[s h[ deeply plant$ 9 ! v be+ ( ,god is ?is pr9ciple ( rev]5ce = ! p]son4 ,"h1 too1 ! impossibility ( arbitr>y div9e decrees meets u4 ,?is w\ld be treat+ a p]son z a ?+1 & ,god himself may n d t & rema9 ,god4 ,if a man _c see 8 way to a fai? bo? 9 ! div9e =ekn[l$ge & 9 ! moral initiative ( m51 !re=e1 he mu/ n hesitate to *oose ev5 ! div9e nesci5ce ( ! free acts ( m51 r ?an ?9k ( ,god z compell+ m54 ,our :ole moral univ]se tumbles ab\t our e>s1 if he :o is ! s\rce ( all is n 9 e>ne/ ) p]sons4 ,& yet !re is mu* !ological ?9k+1 ( :i* ! common notions ( a p]sonal reign ( ,*ri/ on ! e>? may be tak5 z an example1 t practically looks to a k+dom by compulsion4 ,a k+dom ( free spirits _c be m]ely decre$4 7#c7 ,9 ,provid5ce4--,& ?is same pr9ciple ( rev]5ce = p]sonality mu/ be felt to be ! guid+ motive & key1 z well1 9 ! provid5ce & gov]nm5t ( ,god4 ,god keeps 8 h&s (f4 ,he mu/ s act z to call out1 n to suppress1 individual initiative4 ,?is is1 p]haps1 ! deepe/ reason = a sph]e ( law1 t !re may be a realm 9 :i* a p]son c h 8 own free developm5t1 un9t]f]$ ) by any moral compulsion4 ,if1 n[1 ?is sph]e ( law is to be any true tra9+ gr\nd = "*1 z we saw 9 ! ?ird *apt]1 results mu/ n be =?) set aside1 ! mutual influ5ce ( m5 mu/ hold all along ! l9e4 ,ev5 9 ! case ( great evils1 ,god does n /ep 9 at once to set ?+s "r4 ,"* is an exce$+ly co/ly product4 ,?is is no play-_w1 ei!r z to mutual influ5ce or z to fre$om4 ,god gu>ds mo/ jeal\sly ! fre$om & p]sonality ( m54 ,he nev] =gets t "* mu/ be f )94 ,he w n accept1 z ,*ri/ w\ld n1 a fai? compell$ by signs4 ,h5ce1 too1 we are left to ask1 & mu* is left to dep5d on our ask+4 ,s1 also1 ,god does n remove all difficulties & give sight 9 place ( fai?4 ,he seems ev5 c>eless1 (t51 ( h[ ?+s g2 = he w\ld n only appeal to ! h]oic 9 u1 b he wi%es to make x impossible = u to confuse prud5ce & virtue 9 ourselves or o!rs1 & s to give u ! opportunity & ! joy ( a real moral victory1 ( kn[+ t we h made a g5u9ely unselfi% surr5d] to ! "r4 ,9 ! light ( ?is deep-ly+ pr9ciple ( ,god's sacr$ rev]5ce = ! p]son1 "o le>ns to hu% 8 =m] compla9ts1 & ) full he>t to ?ank ,god t he lives 9 a _w :]e righte\sness & happ9ess d n always seem to fall toge!r1 & :]e1 !re=e1 he c s]ve ,god = naught4 ,oh1 let u "k1 t x is n t ,god does n c>e1 b t he c>es s mu*--too mu* to sacrifice to pres5t com=t ! "* ( ! *ild he loves--too mu* to %ut him out f 8 highe/ opportunity4 7#d7 ,9 ,our ,p]sonal ,religi\s ,life4--,& ! same pr9ciple holds 9 our p]sonal religi\s life4 ,! unobtrusiv5ess ( ,god's relation to u1 ( :i* we (t5 compla91 is r to be tak5 z evid5ce ( 8 sacr$ respect = our own moral initiative1 & pro( ( 8 c>eful adaptation to our moral ne$4 ,:]ev] a /rong p]sonality is 9 relation to a weak]1 ! /rong] mu/ ma9ta9 a consci5ti\s self-re/ra9t1 le/ he dom9ate ! p]sonality ( ! o!r1 to ! o!r's moral injury & to ! h9d]+ ( 8 individuality4 ,x is possible = a boy to be injuri\sly ti$ to 8 "m's apron-/r+s4 ,mu* m is x necess>y t ,god's relation to u %\ld n be obtrusive4 ,god mu/ gu>d our fre$om & our individuality4 ,he mu/ ev5 take pa9s to hide 8 h&1 z a /rong1 influ5tial1 b wise fri5d w\ld d4 ,z we g high]1 our life is & mu/ be increas+ly "o ( fai?1 ! ,fa!r's relation less & less obtrusive4#aac ,! times ( vision are giv5 to make u pati5t 9 our progress t[>d ! goal4 ,& aft] ! vision comes (t5 :at ,r5del ,h>ris calls ! d>k night ( fai?1 :5 e /ep has to be tak5 9 absolute dep5d5ce ^u ,god & assurance t ! vision 0 tru? & 0 no lie4#aad ,we ne$ ! invisible ,god = "*4 ,x is = ?is reason1 no d\bt1 t ,god makes s r>e use ( ov]:elm+ exp]i5ces 9 ! religi\s life4 ,he w\ld be *os5 ) cle> & rational self-consci\sness1 & s he r>ely ov]p[]s4 ,& ev5 9 exp]i5ces :i* seem mo/ ov]p[]+1 if ! p]son is really awake to _! true e?ical & spiritual import1 !y w probably be f\nd delicately adapt$ to call out ! individual's own response4 ,b = mo/ ( u su* exp]i5ces prove a real temptation1 because we all[ ! passively emotional to absorb our att5tion1 & s lose ! e?ical & spiritual fruit4 ,:]e ^! m>vel\s exp]i5ces h be5 mo/ m>k$1 & h pla9ly giv5 real help1 !y seem /ill1 usually1 to h be5 ne$$ because ( "s false conception ( ,god & ! spiritual _w t requir$ a p[]ful corrective4 ,"h !y seem really to h be5 grant$1 z probably ! transfiguration ( ,*ri/ 0 to ! disciples1 z a concession to m5's weakness1 ,god cons5t+ reluctantly to use = ! "t a l[] l9e ( appeal1 because m5 are unable to rise to ! high] appeal4 ,we h already se5 ! dang] ( ! neo-platonic ov]-e/imation ( emotional exp]i5ce1 & ( sudd5 & magical crises 9 religion2 & ?is dang] is especially se5 9 mu* t is said conc]n+ ! "w ( ! ,holy ,_s4 ,x seems z if x 7 simply true1 = _m e>ne/ & s9c]e ,*ri/ians1 t ! sup]/itions1 :i* !y _h consci5ti\sly put aside else:]e 9 religion1 all came back 9 _! ?\ght ( ! "w ( ! ,_s4 ,"h _! relation to ,god has ceas$ to be ?\ght ( z a p]sonal or moral or truly spiritual "o2 & !y are look+ m or less def9itely = bodily ?rills1 = m>k$ & ov]:elm+ emotional exp]i5ces1 or = sudd5 trans=mations--h>dly to be call$ trans=mations ( "*--9 ! passive half-magical removal ( temptations altoge!r4 ,t is1 !y are look+ = moral & spiritual results f unmoral & unspiritual processes4 ,! exact po9t is ?is3 ,d\btless we are n n>r[ly to limit :at ! p]sonal influ5ce ( ! p]sonal ,_s ( ,god may d 9 trans=m+ human life--! possibilities probably f> transc5d :at we ?9k--b we are cle>ly to see t ! relation is p]sonal1 t ! influ5ce is spiritual & "u /rictly e?ical conditions1 if we are to escape f simply pagan sup]/ition4 ,let u see t1 if ,god is a ,p]sonal ,_s & n an imp]sonal sub/ance1 !n1 z ,h]rmann says1 he communes ) u ?r\gh manife/ations ( 8 inn] life1 & :5 he consci\sly & purposely makes u feel :at 8 m9d is1 !n we feel himself4#aae ,&1 !n1 let u add1 z has be5 already e>li] said1 t ! deep5+ life 9 ! ,_s becomes pla9ly a deep5+ p]sonal fri5d%ip & communion ) ,god1 ) laws--^? ( a gr[+ fri5d%ip--t we may /udy & "k & obey2 & among ^! laws1 none is ( m c5tral importance ?an ?is ( ! rev]5ce = ! p]son4 7#e7 ,9 ! ,judgm5t4--,& :5 we turn to ,god's relation to u 9 ! judgm5t1 we c be sure1 ,i ?9k1 ( a fur!r application ( ?is pr9ciple1 contr>y to common tea*+ & expectation4 ,we h no reason to look =w>d to a "t :5 ! secrets ( all1 or ( any1 he>ts %all be laid b>e to all4 ,9 s do+1 ,god w\ld violate1 x seems to me1 ! pr9ciple ( 8 entire deal+ ) m51 & give ! lie to 8 own revelation 9 ,*ri/ & 9 hi/ory4 ,= myself1 ,dr4 ,cl>ke's words c>ry imm$iate conviction3 ,no man ne$s to "k ! secrets ( 8 neighbor1 & be able to trace ! ju/ice ( ,god ?r\gh 8 neighbor's life1 & no man :o respects ! sacr$ness ( individuality w desire x4 ,nei!r revelation ( 8 own secrets nor k ( ano!r's seems a good ?+ to a self-respect+ s\l4#aaf ,ev5 ! judgm5t itself proce$s1 no d\bt1 9 cle> recognition ( ! free p]sonality4 ,we are judg$ by ! law ( lib]ty4 ,& we really *oose our own de/9y1 z ,phillips ,brooks sugge/s 9 "o ( 8 mo/ /rik+ p>agraphs4 ,by ?is law we %all be judg$4 ,h[ simple & sublime x makes ! judgm5t day6 ,we /& be=e ! great :ite ?rone & wait our v]dict4 ,we wat* ! clos$ lips ( ! ,et]nal ,judge1 & our he>ts /& /ill until ^? lips %all op5 & pron\nce our fate1 heav5 or hell4 ,! lips d n op54 ,! ,judge j lifts 8 h& & raises f ea* s\l be=e him e law ( con/ra9t ^: pressure has be5 its education4 ,he lifts ! laws ( con/ra9t1 & _! results are manife/4 ,! real intr9sic nature ( ea* s\l leaps to ! surface4 ,ea* s\l's law ( lib]ty becomes supreme4 ,& ea* s\l1 )\t "o ^w ( comm5dation or approval1 by its own inn] t5d5cy1 seeks its own place4444 ,! free+ ( s\ls is ! judg+ ( s\ls4 ,a lib]at$ nature dictates its own de/9y4 ,c\ld !re be a m solemn judgm5t seat8 ,is x n a fe>ful ?+ to be judg$ by ! law ( lib]ty8#aag ,& we may be mo/ c]ta91 t1 9 any judgm5t by ,god1 !re c be no ?\ght ( human wa/e4 ,! man mu/ rema9 = ,god1 to ! end1 a *ild ( ,god1 a p]son ( sacr$ness & value1 to be dealt ) always z capable ( "*4 ,& x is along j ?is l9e t1 indep5d5tly ( exegetical gr\nds1 x seems to me1 we are l$ to a decisive rejection ( ! doctr9e ( annihilation4 ,& ,i "k no m conv9c+ putt+ ( ! matt] ?an ?is brief b compreh5sive /atem5t ( ,fairbairn3 ,if !re is any tru? 9 ! ,fa!rhood1 w\ld n annihilation be ev5 m a puni%m5t ( ,god ?an ( man8 ,! annihilat$ creature w\ld inde$ be gone =ev]--good & evil1 %ame & mis]y1 p5alty & pa91 w\ld = him all be end$ ) 8 be+2 b x w\ld n be s ) ,god--out ( 8 memory ! "n ( ! man c\ld nev] p]i%1 & x w\ld be1 z x 71 ! et]nal symbol ( a s\l he _h made only to f9d t ) x he c\ld d no?+ bett] ?an de/roy x4#aah 7#f7 ,9 ! ,future ,life4--,d\btless our difficulties are n at an end ev5 s2 b1 at lea/1 our conception ( ,god is sav$ f self-contradiction2 & ! ,fa!r is se5 z suff]+ 9 ! s9 ( ! son1 & p]petually desir+ & seek+ 8 return1 nev] satisfi$ s long z any *ild ( 8 /ill refuses 8 place 9 ! ,fa!r's love4 ,?is deep-go+ pr9ciple ( rev]5ce = p]sonality1 ) :i* we are deal+1 is ! f9e/ fl[] ( human e?ical developm5t1 & seems completely to %ut out ! possibility ( compulsion by ,god at any "t 9 ! future life4 ,a p]son w nev] be treat$ z a ?+4 ,! s\l t turns to ,god mu/ be won volunt>ily4 ,& if1 !n1 ! ab/ract possibility ( endless resi/ance to ,god by m5 _c be d5i$2 s nei!r c ! possibility--p]haps "o might ev5 say1 ! practical probability--be d5i$ t ,god1 9 8 inf9ite love & pati5ce & wisdom1 may f9ally w9 !m all out ( _! resi/ance4 ,& ! et]nal hope is at lea/ op52 b x is op51 x %\ld be not$1 only ^u ! fulfilm5t by m5 ( precisely ^? moral conditions :i* hold n[ 9 ! e>?ly life1 & :i* ought n[ to be obey$4 ,!re w nev] be an easi] way to ,god4 ,x is %all[ ?9k+ t supposes t1 if !re be any possibility ( turn+ to ,god 9 ! future life1 x is ( small mom5t t "o %\ld n[ put himself :]e he ought to be4 ,! full results ( all our evil s[+1 we mu/ receive4 ,! utmo/ t on any rational !ory1 !n1 c be held out to m51 is ! hope t1 fac+ a great] h]itage ( evil ?an n[ !y face1 !y might return to ,god "u ! same condition ( absolute moral surr5d]1 :i* n[ holds1 & ! fulfilm5t ( :i* is n[ f> m easily possible to !m4 ,& x ought n to be ov]look$ t1 ev5 if ! pr9ciple ( rev]5ce = p]sonality be mu* less f>-rea*+ ?an is "h affirm$1 ! annihilation ( a s\l by ,god c\ld seem ju/ifi$ only ^u ! assumption t ,god =esaw ! entire future1 & knew t ! s\l w\ld nev] turn to righte\sness & ,god4 ,b if ! doctr9e ( annihilation is to be ju/ifi$ on t gr\nd1 x is to be obs]v$1 t ! same =ekn[l$ge w\ld h enabl$ ,god to "k be=e creation all ! f9ally incorrigible1 if !re 7 to be any su*1 & s he ne$ n h call$ ^! into be+ at all4 ,a goal1 !re=e1 z great if n f> great]1 ?an t (f]$ by ! annihilation !ory w\ld be1 ?us1 atta9able simply ^u ! same assumption t mu/ rationally be made by t !ory1 &1 at ! same "t1 ! great objection to t !ory--its violation ( p]sonality--w\ld be avoid$4 ,x seems probable t ?is v pr9ciple ( rev]5ce = p]sonality conta9s ! *ief reason :y m has n be5 reveal$ to u conc]n+ ! future life4 ,*ri/ianity is v f> f satisfy+ our curiosity "h4 ,x gives little m ?an ! absolutely ne$$ assurance ( ! fact & wor? ( ! life beyond4 ,details are ei!r q lack+1 or giv5 only 9 broade/ symbols4 ,?is retic5t sil5ce ( revelation seems ne$$ if our individual initiative is n to be h9d]$1 ei!r by excess ( motive on ! "o h&1 or by ! depression ( an unappreciat$ ideal on ! o!r h&4 ,on ! "o h&1 t is1 s f> z we c\ld und]/& a detail$ revelation ( ! future life1 to set x =? ) ! realism ( ! pres5t life w\ld be to int]f]e ) t unobtrusive relation ( ,god to u1 :i* we h se5 to be s necess>y to our highe/ moral tra9+4 ,we ne$1 9 ?is "t ( our tra9+1 a c]ta9 obscurity ( spiritual tru?2 we ne$ to walk by fai?1 n by sight4 ,to be able s obvi\sly to weigh ! et]nal realities aga9/ ! temporal1 w\ld h9d] r ?an help our gr[? 9 loyal1 unselfi% "*4 ,on ! o!r h&1 if a complete & indubitable revelation ( ! future life 7 giv5 u1 no d\bt !re w\ld be mu* t c\ld make b small appeal to u1 & might ev5 prove positively depress+1 because we h n yet ! exp]i5ce :i* w\ld int]pret to u its mean+ & op5 to u its joy4 ,our e>?ly life may furni% u an analogy4 ,! joy ( a gr[n man is (t5 prem95tly 9 8 "w1 b he w\ld f9d x difficult to expla9 to a *ild ! s\rce ( 8 joy4 ,& if ! *ild 7 told t !re w\ld come a "t 9 a few ye>s :5 8 *ief joy w\ld be f\nd 9 "w1 ! prospect w\ld probably n seem to him invit+4 ,! wise/ ( u may be z little prep>$ to ent] 9 detail into ! mean+ ( ! future life4 ,we may be cont5t to "k t ! future life is1 & is ( value beyond t :i* we c n[ und]/&2 & we may be assur$ t at lea/ :at we h already se5 to be ! ideal conditions ( ! ri*e/ life1#aai z n[ we und]/& life1 w be fully met 9 ! future life4 ,we c h>dly d\bt1 !re=e1 t ! two great c5t]s ( ! life beyond mu/ be association & "w2 ?\gh we may n "k ! precise =ms t ^! w take1 nor h[ greatly bo? may deep5 beyond our pres5t conception4 ,/eadily deep5+ p]sonal relations1 root$ 9 ! "o absolutely satisfy+ relation to ,god 9 ,*ri/1 !re mu/ be2 & "w1 9 :i* "o may lose himself ) joy1 because x is ,god's "w4 ,?is1 at lea/1 ! future life w conta94 ,we c h>dly g f>!r ) assurance4 ,b p]haps ev5 ?is may sugge/1 t m5 may v>y mu* 9 ! proportionate emphasis laid ^u ^! two great s\rces ( life1 & /ill alike come into a g5u9e & rew>d+ relation to ,god4 ,t ,god has c\nt$ individuality among m5 to be ( prime significance1 ! facts ( creation h>dly all[ u to d\bt4 ,possibly x is only ano!r application ( ?is same pr9ciple ( rev]5ce = ! p]son1 9 ! recognition ( t individuality :i* has its great joy 9 "w1 :i* is to be f\nd 9 :at ,pr(essor ,george ,f4 ,g5ung sugge/ively calls an apocalypse ( ,kipl+4 ,9 ,kipl+'s poem to ,wolcott ,bale/i]1 ,pr(essor ,g5ung sees ! discov]y ( a religion1 or assignable & et]nally rew>dable relation to ,god1 9 ^? ^: inn] life is n introspective or self-expressive4 ,_! spiritual life s]ves ,god ) ! joy :i* comes ( foll[+ & satisfy+1 9 ! sph]e ( 8 plans1 ! eag] b5t ( a conqu]+ w4 ,x is ! religion ( "w & ( d>+4 ,& x is only 9 ! op5 vision ( an et]nal _w t _! secul> ardor1 :i* 0 unconsci\sly s]v+ ,god all along1 beg9s to come to ! p]ception ( a transc5d5t ma/] & to be trans=m$ into an adoration1 an ob$i5ce & loyalty1 a 'w to s]ve or to be /ill z fitte? our ,fa!r's praise4' ,x is q possible t ?r\gh our v failure to ent] into ,god's own deep rev]5ce = ! p]son1 9 ! recognition ( man's div9ely giv5 individuality1 z well z ?r\gh failure to recognize ! ess5tial l-m9d$ness ( m51 we h be5 %utt+ ! door ( hope1 :]e ,god has n %ut x1 & h limit$ beyond w>rant ! div9e m]cy4 ,ev5 9 ! life ( heav5 m5 _c be all alike4 ,:o art ?\ t judge/ ! s]vant ( ano!r8 to 8 own "l he /&e? or falle?4 ,yea1 he %all be made to /&2 = ! ,"l ha? p[] to make him /&4#abj #ib ,! ,limits ( ,evolution1 p4 x4 #ic ,cf4 above1 pp4 #bb1 #ff1 #ajf4 #id ,see especially ,b[ne1 ,!ory ( ,?\ght & ,k1 pp4 #bci1 #cgg1 #cgh2 ,james1 ,! ,w to ,believe1 pp4 #ade ff4 #ie ,cf4 above1 p4 #dd ff #if ,see ,k+1 ,recon/ruction 9 ,!ology1 pp4 #bda ff4 #ig ,ha/+s1 ,diction>y ( ! ,bible1 ,vol4 ,,ii1 p4 #fbf4 #ih ,see ,k+1 ,recon/ruction 9 ,!ology1 ,*aps4 ,,vi & ,,vii4 #ii ,i aim "h to br+ out ) "s fullness ! significance ( ! propositions briefly summ>iz$ 9 ! ,recon/ruction 9 ,!ology1 p4 #bdd2 & ,i v5ture to repeat1 also1 two quotations f t book1 because !y fit s closely into ! argum5t "h4 #ajj ,! ,place ( ,*ri/ 9 ,mod]n ,!ology1 p4 #cgh4 #aja ,cf4 ,k+1 ,recon/ruction 9 ,!ology1 pp4 #bcb1 #bcc1 #bdh1 #bdi4 #ajb ,see ,k+1 ,recon/ruction 9 ,!ology1 p4 #bji2 & bel[1 p4 #bji4 #ajc ,! ,limits ( ,evolution1 p4 #g4 #ajd ,e?ics & ,revelation1 p4 #bgj4 #aje ,cf4 ,k+1 ,recon/ruction 9 ,!ology1 pp4 #bje ff4 #ajf ,cf4 ,lotze1 ,! ,microcosmus1 ,vol4 ,,ii1 pp4 #fij ff4 #ajg ,see ,recon/ruction 9 ,!ology1 ,*apt] ,,vi4 #ajh ,e?ics & ,revelation1 p4 #bgj4 #aji ,see ! full] /atem5t 9 ! ,recon/ruction 9 ,!ology1 pp4 #if-ajh4 #aaj ,fairbairn1 ,! ,place ( ,*ri/ 9 ,mod]n ,!ology1 p4 #dhc4 #aaa ,outl9e ( ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 pp4 #afa1 ff4 #aab ,jesus ,*ri/ & ! ,social ,"q1 p4 #aja4 #aac ,cf4 ,fairbairn1 ,! ,place ( ,*ri/ 9 ,mod]n ,!ology1 pp4 #dcd1 #dce4 #aad ,union ) ,god1 p4 #aji4 #aae ,! ,communion ( ! ,*ri/ian ) ,god1 p4 #adc4 #aaf ,an ,outl9e ( ,*ri/ian ,!ology1 p4 #dfd4 #aag ,! ,c&le ( ! ,"l & ,o!r ,s]mons1 p4 #aig4 #aah ,! ,place ( ,*ri/ 9 ,mod]n ,!ology1 p4 #dfg4 #aai ,see above1 pp4 #fh ff4 #abj ,romans #ad3d4 ,,index ,abbott1 ,lyman1 ref]5ce to1 #aca4 ,am]ican ,j\rnal ( ,!ology1 ,!1 ref]5ce to1 #hf4 ,analogy ( ,organism4 ,see ,organism4 ,annihilation1 doctr9e (1 :y reject$1 #bci ff4 ,arbitr>9ess1 exclud$ 9 ,god1 #bbj ff4 ,ari/otle1 quot$1 #bf2 8 position ab&on$ by my/icism1 #ef4 ,association1 p]sonal1 9 r$emption1 #adi ff2 9 p]sonal relation to ,god1 #aei ff2 9 confessions ( fai?1 #afg ff4 ,assumption ( ! book1 #c4 ,atonem5t1 9 ! light ( social consci\sness1 #adg ff1 #aej ff2 ! co/ (1 #aej2 sub/itution & propitiation 91 #aej ff2 analogy ( fa!r & *ild 91 #aed ff2 blood cov5ant appli$ to1 #aeg4 ,baldw91 ,j4 ,m41 ref]5ce to1 #ab4 ,biblical ,tr9ity1 #bbd1 #bbe4 ,blood cov5ant1 z appli$ to doctr9e ( atonem5t1 #aeg4 ,bhme1 ,jacob1 ref]r$ to1 #ga4 ,b[ne1 ,b4 ,p41 on causality & purpose1 #dc2 on fre$om1 #ahb1 #ahc4 ,bradley1 ,f4 ,h41 on ! religi\s feel+ 9 philosophy1 #abi4 ,brooks1 ,phillips1 ref]5ce to1 #bh1 #adf2 on ! intellectual life ( ,jesus1 #ha2 on ! emotional life ( ,jesus1 #hd2 on ! univ]sal int]e/ ( ,jesus1 #abd2 on ! lik5ess ( m51 #abf2 on judgm5t accord+ to ! law ( lib]ty1 #bch4 ,bruce's ,! ,k+dom ( ,god1 ref]5ce to1 #eb4 ,bu%nell1 ,h41 on imp5it5ce ( ,jesus1 #aic4 ,calv9ism1 #bbj4 ,causality & purpose1 #db1 #dc4 ,*ri/1 ,see ,jesus4 ,*ri/ian1 ! hi/orically1 emphasiz$ by ! social consci\sness1 #ajb ff4 ,*ri/ianity1 z contribut+ to s5se ( mutual influ5ces1 #ac2 sometimes unconsci\s1 #acj4 ,*ur*1 !1 importance ( ! doctr9e (1 #agg ff4 ,cl>ke1 ,w4 ,n41 ref]r$ to1 #aaf1 #bbd2 quot$1 #acb1 #acc1 #aeb2 on propitiation1 #aea2 on doctr9e ( ,tr9ity & ,triunity1 #bbc2 on revelation ( inn] life at judgm5t1 #bcg4 ,common qualities & int]e/s1 mo/ valuable1 #agg ff4 ,confessions ( fai?1 ,*ri/ian fell[%ip 91 #afg ff2 uni=mity 91 impossible1 #afi ff2 & undesirable1 #aga ff4 ,cor9?ians1 fir/1 twelf? *apt] (1 z expression ( analogy ( organism1 #bc2 aga9/ false my/icism1 #fj-fa1 #hc4 ,cornill1 ref]5ce to1 #fd4 ,creation1 et]nal1 #bad ff2 rev]5ce = p]son 91 #bcj ff4 ,cre$1 ,*ri/ian fell[%ip 91 #afg ff2 uni=mity 91 impossible1 #afi ff2 & undesirable1 #aga ff4 ,d5ison1 ,j4 ,h41 ref]r$ to1 #aig4 ,devotional lit]ature1 difficulty 91 #hd2 ref]r$ to1 #ada4 ,dewey1 ,john1 ref]r$ to1 #ab4 ,drummond1 ,h41 ref]5ce to1 #ba2 on s91 #adj4 ,du ,bois1 ,patt]son1 on true _s ( fa!rhood1 #aaj4 ,edw>ds1 ,jona?an1 ref]r$ to1 #bb4 ,election1 9 ,paul1 #aaf2 a *oice = s]vice1 #aaf4 ,emotion1 extreme emphasis on1 a dang] 9 my/icism1 #ga2 cf4 #ace ff4 ,et]nal creation1 #bad ff4 ,et]nal tru?s1 ,god's relation to1 #bab ff4 ,e?ical1 !1 9 religion1 #hf ff2 pro(s t religion mu/ be1 #hi ff4 ,e?iciz+ ( religion1 #hi ff2 involv$ 9 relation to ,*ri/1 #hi2 ! div9e w 9 e?ical comm&1 #ij2 involv$ 9 nature ( ,god's gifts1 #ia2 communion ) ,god ?r\gh h>mony ) 8 w1 #ib2 ! vision ( ,god = ! pure 9 he>t1 #ib2 %>+ ! life ( ,god1 #ic2 ,*ri/1 z satisfy+ our claims on life1 #id2 attraction to ,*ri/1 e?ically condition$1 #if2 ! moral law1 a revelation ( ! love ( ,god1 #ih4 ,e?ics & religion1 #hg1 #hi ff4 ,ev]ett1 ,c4 ,c1 criticism ( ,nietzs*e1 #abj4 ,expository ,times1 ,!1 ref]5ce to1 #fd4 ,fairbairn1 ,a4 ,m41 8 ,! ,place ( ,*ri/ 9 ,mod]n ,!ology1 m5tion$1 #aaj2 on ! ,*ri/ian consci\sness1 #aab2 ref]r$ to1 #aai1 #aif1 #bae1 #bcd2 on s5se ( s91 #adc2 on ,*ri/ z transc5d5t1 #ahi2 on passibility ( ,god1 #bba2 on annihilation1 #bci4 ,fai?1 necessity (1 9 life1 #dc1 #dd4 ,fai? 9 m51 increas$ by s5se ( lik5ess1 #abh4 ,fa!r & *ild1 ! analogy (1 appli$ to r$emption1 #aed ff4 ,favorites1 none ) ,god1 #aaf ff4 ,fell[%ip1 ,*ri/ian1 help (1 9 com+ into k+dom1 #aei ff2 )9 ! k+dom1 #afb ff2 9 int]cessory pray]1 #afd ff2 9 confessions ( fai?1 #afg ff4 ,fiske1 ,john1 ref]5ce to1 #ba4 ,fre$om1 9 man1 #aha ff2 ,b[ne on1 #ahb1 #ahc2 ref]5ces on1 #ahb4 ,fremantle1 ,w4 ,h41 ref]5ce to1 #ada4 ,fri5d%ip1 laws (1 z hold+ 9 religion1 #fg4 ,future life2 moral reality (1 #acb ff2 rev]5ce = p]son 91 #bdj ff4 ,galatians1 ,epi/le to1 ref]r$ to1 #hc4 ,g5ung1 ,g4 ,f41 on an apocalypse ( ,kipl+1 #bde4 ,gidd+s1 ,f4 ,h41 ref]5ce to1 #i1 #aj1 #ai1 #bj1 #fb1 #aag2 on ! social m9d1 #ach4 ,god1 imman5ce (1 z relat$ to social consci\sness1 #dj ff2 8 w1 e?ical basis ( social consci\sness1 #dd ff2 %>+ 9 our life1 #dh2 w (1 felt 9 e?ical comm&1 #ij2 8 gifts require e?ical attitude to receive !m1 #ia1 #ib2 our %>+ 8 life1 #ic2 we _c d 8 w 9 g5]al1 #ajj2 a ?or\ghly p]sonal conception (1 ne$$1 #bjg ff2 gu>d+ ! conception (1 #bjh ff1 #baa2 suprap]sonal 91 #bji2 ,na% on doctr9e ( p]sonality (1 #baj2 always completely p]sonal1 #bab ff2 relation to et]nal tru?s1 #bab ff2 z et]nally creat+1 #bad ff2 unity & un*angeabl5ess (1 #baf ff2 limit+ conception ( imman5ce (1 #bag ff2 deep5+ ?\ght ( ,fa!rhood (1 #bah ff2 z ! great s]vant1 #bai2 no arbitr>9ess 91 #bbj2 passibility ( ,god1 #bba2 tr9ity 91 #bbb ff4 ,grahame1 ,k5ne?1 on love1 #abc2 ref]r$ to1 #abd4 ,h>nack1 ,a41 on ,*ri/1 #bjj4 ,h>ris1 ,j4 ,r41 quot$1 #bcd4 ,hegel1 on greate/ 9 art1 #aai4 ,h]$ity1 n to be ov]-emphasiz$1 #cg2 ,james1 on1 #cg1 #ch4 ,h]rmann1 ,w41 ref]r$ to1 #bb1 #gj1 #agc2 8 def9ition ( my/icism1 #ef1 #eg2 on pan!i/ic t5d5cy 9 my/icism1 #eh1 #gd2 on our satisfaction 9 ,*ri/1 #id2 on ! help ( ! fell[%ip ( ! *ur*1 #afa2 on ,*ri/'s ris+ to 8 ideals1 #aid2 on ,*ri/'s call+ out absolute tru/1 #aii2 on p]sonal relation to ,god1 #bcg4 ,hi/orical1 !1 "u-e/imat$ by my/icism1 #gb4 ,hi/orical ju/ification ne$$ by social consci\sness1 #ei ff1 #ajb ff4 ,hi/orically1 !1 ,*ri/ian1 emphasiz$ by ! social consci\sness1 #ajb ff4 ,hi/ory1 no m]e natural process1 #bah ff2 ,god 91 vii1 #bai4 ,holy ,_s1 doctr9e (1 (t5 made sup]/iti\s1 #bcf4 ,hone/y ( ! _w1 d\ble mean+ (1 #hj4 ,hope = m51 increas$ by s5se ( lik5ess1 #abh4 ,hosea1 z illu/ration ( int]-play ( human & div9e relations1 #fh4 ,h[ells1 ,w4 ,d41 8 ,a ,boy's ,t[n1 quot$1 #aah2 ref]r$ to1 #abc4 ,h[ison1 ,g4 ,h41 on ! p]son1 #ahj1 #bjh1 #bcj2 ref]r$ to1 #baj4 ,humanity1 idea (1 f ,*ri/ianity1 #ac4 ,ideal view1 requires ! facts ( ! social consci\sness1 #bi ff1 #cb ff4 ,imitation1 to be avoid$1 #agb ff4 ,imman5ce ( ,god1 z metaphysical gr\nd ( facts ( social consci\sness1 #dj ff2 ,lotze on1 #dj1 #da2 limitations 9 conception (1 #bag ff4 ,immortability1 discuss$1 #abd ff4 ,immortality1 ,j4 ,s4 ,mill on1 #ej2 ,sully on1 #ej2 doctr9e (1 z affect$ by s5se ( lik5ess ( m51 #abd ff2 ref]5ces on1 #abe4 ,indian my/icism1 #gd4 ,israel1 significance ( its social /ruggle1 #fc2 ec/asy among its prophets1 #fd4 ,james1 ,william1 on h]$ity1 #cg2 on metaphysics1 #dj2 on s5se ( reality1 #gb2 on nitr\s-oxide-gas intoxication1 #gd2 on ! _w z a confusion1 #gh2 ref]5ce to1 #gi1 #abb1 #abd1 #abf2 on comp5sations1 #aag2 on v>i$ ideals1 #abh2 on cat*+ fai? & c\rage1 #adg4 ,jesus1 ,brooks on 8 intellectual life1 #ha2 on 8 emotional life1 #hd2 relation to1 necess>ily e?ical1 #hi1 #id1 #if2 satisfies our highe/ claims on life1 #id2 8 social emphases1 #aaa ff2 ,brooks on 8 int]e/ 9 ! un9t]e/+1 #abd2 ! great ,*ri/ian confession1 #agd ff2 loyalty to1 be/ assurance = doctr9e1 #age2 ! p]sonal 91 #ahd ff2 a p]sonal revelation ( ,god1 #ahd ff2 ! moral & spiritual 9 8 supremacy1 #ahe ff2 gr\nds ( 8 supremacy1 #ahh ff2 among f\nd]s ( religion1 #ahi ff2 8 s9lessness1 #aib ff2 8 imp5it5ce1 #aic2 rises to highe/ ideals1 #aid ff2 %[s "* ( ,god1 #aie ff2 consci\sly able to r$eem all m51 #aif2 transc5d5t ,god-consci\sness & s5se ( mission1 #aig ff2 calls out absolute tru/1 #aih ff2 9 him ,god c]ta9ly f9ds u1 #aii ff2 ! ideal realiz$1 #bjj ff2 8 d\ble uniqu5ess1 #bja ff2 s5se ( k9%ip )1 & reality (1 #bje ff2 div9ity (1 z relat$ to ,tr9ity1 #bbd2 rev]5ce = p]son 91 #bbf ff4 ,judgm5t1 accord+ to light1 #acb ff2 h[ ,god's c be favorable1 #aec ff2 rev]5ce = p]son 91 #bcg ff2 accord+ to law ( lib]ty1 #bch ff4 ,kaftan1 ,j41 ref]r$ to1 #hf4 ,keim1 quot$1 #eb4 ,k+1 ref]5ces to 8 ,recon/ruction 9 ,!ology1 #af1 #bj1 #bc1 #dc1 #fg1 #ahe1 #ahg1 #ahh1 #bjc1 #bje1 #bab1 #bag1 #bah4 ,kipl+1 ,r41 on ! value ( ! common1 #aai2 ,g4 ,f4 ,g5ung on1 #bde4 ,lani]1 ,s41 quot$1 on ,*ri/1 #bja4 ,leibnitz1 ref]r$ to1 #agb4 ,life1 ! ri*e/1 ideal conditions (1 #fh ff4 ,l-m9d$ness ( m51 #i ff2 an elem5t ( social consci\sness1 #i ff1 #dg2 influ5ce on !ology1 #aae ff2 summ>y on1 #acd2 se5 "u div]se =ms1 #aba ff4 ,lotze1 ref]5ce to1 #ac1 #be1 #ca1 #db1 #bac1 #bad2 on passion = con/ru+ ev]y?+1 #be1 #bf2 on imman5ce ( ,god1 #dj4 ,love1 s5se (1 #bj2 elem5t 9 social consci\sness1 #bj1 #ea2 z motive 9 creation1 #bae4 ,man1 ! p]sonal 91 #ahj ff2 sep>at5ess f ,god1 #ahj ff2 fre$om 91 #aha ff2 a *ild ( ,god1 #ahc ff4 ,ma!son1 ,george1 on sacrifice1 #di4 ,mc,connell1 ,s4 ,d41 objection to "o "p 9 8 argum5t z to immortality1 #abd ff4 ,mc,curdy1 on ! significance ( ! social /ruggle 9 ,israel1 #fc4 ,metaphysical1 n to be emphasiz$1 9 conception ( ,*ri/1 #ahe ff2 h[ to be ?\ght1 z to ,*ri/1 #bjc1 #bjd2 9 doctr9e ( ,tr9ity1 #bbf4 ,mill1 ,j4 ,s41 on immortality1 #ej4 ,moral _w1 pr]equisites (1 #cj ff2 sph]e ( law1 #cj2 e?ical fre$om1 #cj2 "s p[] ( accompli%m5t1 #ca2 memb]s "o ( ano!r1 #cb4 ,mi/9ess 9 my/icism1 #gc4 ,moral initiative 9 m51 #aha ff4 ,moral law1 a revelation ( ! love ( ,god1 #ih4 ,mul=d1 ,e41 ref]r$ to1 #bbi4 ,mn/]b]g1 ,h41 ref]r$ to1 #gi2 ref]5ce to 8 ,psy*ology & ,life1 #gi4 ,mutual influ5ce ( m51 #aa ff2 contribut+ l9es ( ?\ght1 #aa ff2 ?reefold =m ( ! conviction1 #ac ff2 z elem5t ( social consci\sness1 #aa ff1 #ej2 influ5ce ^u !ological doctr9e1 #acf ff2 = good1 #add ff2 9 atta9m5t ( "*1 #ade ff2 9 p]sonal relation to ,god1 #afj ff2 9 confession ( fai?1 #afg ff4 ,my/ical1 ! falsely1 opposition ( ! social consci\sness to1 #ee ff1 #eg ff2 ,na%'s def9ition (1 #ee1 #ef2 ,h]rmann's def9ition (1 #ef1 #eg2 une?ical1 #eh2 no real p]sonal ,god1 #eh2 belittles p]sonal 9 man1 #ei2 ,paul's rejection (1 #fj1 #fa2 leaves hi/orically ,*ri/ian1 #fb ff4 ,my/ical1 ! truly1 emphasiz$ by ! social consci\sness1 #ff ff1 #gj ff2 requires laws ( a deep5+ fri5d%ip1 #fg2 requires ideal conditions ( ! ri*e/ life1 #fh2 prote/ 9 favor ( :ole man1 #gh ff2 its self-controll$ recognition ( emotion1 #hb ff4 ,my/icism1 its relation to ! social consci\sness1 #ee ff2 false1 #ee ff2 true1 #ff ff1 #gj ff2 ju/ifiable & unju/ifiable elem5ts 91 #ga ff2 its dang]s3 emotionalism1 #ga2 subjectivism1 #gb2 "u-e/imat+ hi/orical1 #gb2 mi/9ess1 #gc2 pan!ism1 #gc ff2 symbolism1 #gf4 ju/ifiable elem5ts 91 summ$ up1 #gg4 ,na%1 ,h4 ,s41 on e?ical basis ( social consci\sness 9 w ( ,god1 #de ff2 8 def9ition ( ! my/ical1 #ee1 #ef2 ref]r$ to1 #gj2 on doctr9e ( div9e p]sonality1 #baj2 on ! sup]natural1 #bag4 ,neo-,d>w9ian s*ool1 ref]r$ to1 #cg4 ,neo-,platonic my/icism1 #ee ff1 #gd4 ,new ,_w1 ,!1 ref]5ce to1 #ab1 #abj4 ,neitzs*e1 criticism (1 by ,ev]ett1 #abj4 ,obligation1 s5se (1 #ah ff2 elem5t 9 social consci\sness1 #ah1 #ea4 ,organism1 analogy (1 #bc ff2 value (1 #bc2 classical expression 9 ,i ,cor4 #ab2 inadequacy (1 = social consci\sness1 #bd ff3 comes f ! sub-p]sonal _w1 #bd2 access to reality only ?r\gh ourselves1 #bd2 mi/ak5 passion = con/ru+ ev]y?+1 #be2 te/$ by def9ition ( social consci\sness1 #bf ff4 ,orr's ,! ,*ri/ian ,view ( ,god & ! ,_w1 ref]5ce to1 #ea4 ,pan!ism1 t5d5cy to1 9 my/icism1 #eh1 #gd4 ,paul1 8 rejection ( ! falsely my/ical1 #fj1 #fa1 #hc4 ,pauls51 on key to reality1 #be2 ref]5ce to1 #cj1 #abi2 on necessity ( fai?1 #df1 #dg4 ,peabody1 ,f4 ,g41 ref]r$ to1 #fe2 on ! social pr9ciples ( ,jesus1 #aaa2 on ,*ri/'s individualism1 #bbi4 ,p]son1 value (1 #af ff1 #ej2 influ5ce ( s5se ( value (1 on !ology1 #agi ff2 rev]5ce =1 *>act]iz+ all ,god's relation to m51 #bbf ff4 ,p]sonal1 !1 recognition (1 #agi ff2 recognition (1 9 man1 #ahj ff2 recognition (1 9 ,*ri/1 #ahd ff2 recognition (1 9 ,god1 #bjg ff4 ,p]sonal idealism1 #ahj1 #aha1 #baj4 ,p]sonal relation1 9 religion1 emphasiz$ by social consci\sness1 #ff ff2 leads to ! truly my/ical1 #gj ff4 ,philo1 z repres5tative ( my/icism1 #ee4 ,philosophical ,review1 ,!1 ref]5ce to1 #dj4 ,philosophy1 z contribut+ to s5se ( mutual influ5ce1 #ab4 ,plato1 8 position ab&on$ by my/icism1 #ef4 ,plot9us1 z repres5tative ( my/icism1 #ee4 ,prophets1 !1 _! /&po9t ab&on$ by ,philo1 #ee2 _! s5se ( ! significance ( ! social /ruggle 9 ,israel1 #fc2 ec/asy 91 #fd4 ,propitiation1 e?ical mean+ (1 #aej ff1 #aef1 #aeh ff4 ,provid5ce1 rev]5ce = p]son 91 #bcb ff4 ,psy*ology1 z contribut+ to s5se ( mutual influ5ce1 #ab4 ,purpose & causality1 #db1 #dc4 ,race-connection1 n prime cause ( unity ( m51 #ce ff4 ,race1 real unity (1 #acf ff2 its solid>ity1 h[ conceiv$1 #af1 #ce1 #cj1 #acg4 ,ranke1 on ,*ri/1 #aib4 ,rational1 two s5ses (1 #hj4 ,recon/ruction 9 ,!ology1 ref]5ces to1 #af1 #bj1 #bc1 #dc1 #fg1 #ahe1 #ahg1 #ahh1 #bjc1 #bje1 #bab1 #bag1 #bah4 ,r$emption1 z view$ f po9t ( view ( mutual influ5ce = good1 #adg ff2 ! co/ (1 #aej2 sub/itution & propitiation 91 #aej ff4 ,religion1 & !ology1 #f1 #aac2 influ5ce ( ! social consci\sness ^u1 #ec ff1 #gj ff2 ! p]sonal relation 91 emphasiz$ by ! social consci\sness1 #ff ff2 its ?or\gh e?iciz+ dem&$ by social consci\sness1 #hf ff2 & e?ics1 #hg2 a supreme factor 9 life1 #ahi4 ,rev]5ce = ! p]son *>act]iz+ all ,god's relations to m51 #bbf ff2 reflect$ 9 ,*ri/1 #bbf ff2 9 creation1 #bcj ff2 9 provid5ce1 #bcb ff2 9 ! p]sonal religi\s life1 #bcc ff2 9 ! judgm5t1 #bcg ff2 9 ! future life1 #bdj ff4 ,rits*l1 ,a41 ref]r$ to1 #acg4 ,royce1 ,josiah1 ref]5ce to1 #ab4 ,sabati]1 ,a41 ref]5ce to1 #aga4 ,s&ay1 ,w41 ref]5ce to1 #ahg4 ,s*ill]1 ,f4 ,c1 ,s41 ref]5ce to1 #dj4 ,sci5ce1 z contribut+ to s5se ( mutual influ5ce1 #aa4 ,scoti/ position z to ,god1 #bac4 ,sep>at5ess f ,god1 mean+ (1 #ahj ff4 ,s91 s5se (1 deep5$ by social consci\sness1 #aci ff2 ,drummond on1 #adj2 lack ( s5se (1 among ,greeks1 #adj2 :5 mo/ fe>$1 #adc4 ,smi?1 ,g4 ,a41 ref]5ce to1 #fd4 ,social consci\sness1 def9ition1 #i ff2 elem5ts 91 #i ff2 mean+ (1 = !ology1 #e ff2 analogy ( organism1 inadequate =1 #bd ff2 analogy1 te/$1 #bf ff2 necessity ( its facts = ideal int]e/s1 #bi ff2 ! "q1 #bi2 else1 no moral _w1 #cj ff1 #cb ff2 ultimate explanation & gr\nd (1 #ce ff2 metaphysical gr\nd1 #ce ff3 n due to physical race-connection1 #ce ff2 nor prim>ily to h]$ity1 #cg ff2 nor to my/ical solid>ity1 #cg ff2 b to imman5ce ( ,god1 #dj ff2 e?ical basis1 #dd ff2 support+ w ( ,god1 #dd2 ,na% on1 #de2 ,pauls5 on1 #df2 ,god's %>+ 9 our life1 #dh ff2 consequ5t transfiguration (1 #di ff4 its influ5ce ^u religion1 #ec ff2 oppos$ to ! falsely my/ical1 #eg ff2 emphasizes p]sonal relation 9 religion1 & s ! truly my/ical1 #ff ff2 dem&s ! e?iciz+ ( religion1 #hf ff2 ne$s hi/orical ju/ification1 #ajb ff2 its influ5ce ^u !ological doctr9e1 #aje ff3 g5]al results1 #aje ff2 influ5ce ( l-m9d$ness ( m51 #aae ff2 ( mutual influ5ce ( m51 #acf ff2 ( s5se ( value ( p]son1 #agi ff4 ,social m9d1 real mean+ (1 #ach2 ,gidd+s on1 #ach4 ,social ,tr9ity1 #bbb ff4 ,solid>ity1 a my/ical1 n to be press$1 #ci4 ,solid>ity ( race1 (t5 falsely conceiv$1 #af1 #ce1 #ci1 #acg ff4 ,/ev5son1 ,r4 ,l41 on ! poetical & ideal 9 m51 #abb2 ref]r$ to1 #abc1 #abd4 ,subjectivism1 t5d5cy to1 9 my/icism1 #gb4 ,sub/itution1 e?ical mean+ (1 #aej ff1 #aeh ff4 ,sully1 ,j41 on immortality1 #ej4 ,supra-p]sonal1 !1 9 ,god1 #bji4 ,symbolism1 /rong t5d5cy to1 9 my/icism1 #gf4 ,sympa?y ) m51 increas$ by s5se ( lik5ess1 #abg4 ,t5nyson1 8 self-hypnotism1 #gd4 ,!me ( ! book1 #a ff4 ,!ologian1 !1 an int]pret]1 #e2 a believ] 9 ! supremacy ( spiritual int]e/s1 #f2 assumes ! fact ( religion1 #f2 assumes a p]sonal ,god1 #g2 takes po9t ( view ( ,*ri/1 #g4 ,!ologian's1 !1 po9t ( view1 #e ff4 ,!ology1 & religion1 #f1 #aac2 9 p]sonal t]ms1 #ajf ff2 ,fa!rhood ( ,god1 det]m9+ pr9ciple 91 #aji2 z influ5c$ by social consci\sness1 #aje ff2 g5]al results 91 #aje ff2 influ5ce ( lik5ess ( m5 on1 #aae ff2 influ5ce ( mutual influ5ce ( m5 on1 #acf ff2 influ5ce ( value ( p]son on1 #agi ff4 ,?omi/ position z to ,god1 #bbc4 ,tr9ity1 doctr9e (1 #bbb ff2 biblical1 #bbd1 #bbe4 ,tr9ity1 ,social1 #bbb ff4 ,tri!ism1 involv$ 9 a real social tr9ity1 #bbb ff4 ,triunity ( ,god1 doctr9e (1 #bbc ff4 ,tru?s1 et]nal1 ,god's relation to1 #bab ff4 ,un*angeabl5ess ( ,god1 #baf ff4 ,unconsci\s ,*ri/ianity1 #acj4 ,uniqu5ess1 a d\ble1 9 ,*ri/1 #bja ff2 metaphysical1 #bjc1 #bjd2 e?ical1 #bjd1 #bje4 ,value & sacr$ness ( p]son1 #af ff2 s5se (1 elem5t 9 social consci\sness1 #af1 #ej4 ,weismann1 ref]r$ to1 #cg4 ,transcrib]'s ,notes3 ,page #ahb1 ,g,od *ang$ to ,god4 ,inconsi/5t hyph5ation reta9$4 ,app>5t pr9t]'s punctuation errors correct$4 ,italics indicat$ by und]scores & translit]at$ ,greek by plus signs4