,,harper',s ,,library of ,,living ,,thought ,,are ,,the ,,planets ,,inhabited8 ,,by ,e4 ,,walter ,,maunder1 ,f4,r4,a4,s4 ,,superintendent ,,of ,,the ,,solar ,,department1 ,,royal ,,observatory ,,greenwich ,,author ,,of ,,astronomy ,,without ,a ,,telescope ,,the ,,royal ,,observatory1 ,,greenwich1 ,,its ,,history ,,and ,,work ,,the ,,astronomy ,,of ,,the ,,bible1 ,,the ,,heavens ,,and ,,their ,,story ,,etc4 ,,harper ,,brothers ,,london ,,and ,,new ,,york #de ,,albemarle ,,street1 ,w4 #aiac ,published ,march1 #aiac ,,contents ,,chapter ,,page ,i4 ,,the ,,question ,,stated #a ,,ii4 ,,the ,,living ,,organism #f ,,iii4 ,,the ,,sun #bj ,,iv4 ,,the ,,distribution ,,of ,,the ,,elements ,,in ,,space #cc ,v4 ,,the ,,moon #dc ,,vi4 ,,the ,,canals ,,of ,,mars #eg ,,vii4 ,,the ,,condition ,,of ,,mars #ga ,,viii4 ,,the ,,illusions ,,of ,,mars #if ,,ix4 ,,venus1 ,,mercury ,,and ,,the ,,asteroids #aaa ,x4 ,,the ,,major ,,planets #abb ,,xi4 ,,when ,,the ,,major ,,planets ,,cool #acc ,,xii4 ,,the ,,final ,,question #adc ,,index #afc ,,are ,,the ,,planets ,,inhabited8 ,,chapter ,i ,,the ,,question ,,stated ,the first thought that men had concerning the heavenly bodies was an obvious one3 they were lights4 ,there was a greater light to rule the day2 a lesser light to rule the night2 and there were the stars also4 ,in those days there seemed an immense difference between the earth upon which men stood1 and the bright objects that shone down upon it from the heavens above4 ,the earth seemed to be vast1 dark1 and motionless2 the celestial lights seemed to be small1 and moved1 and shone4 ,the earth was then regarded as the fixed centre of the universe1 but the ,copernican theory has since deprived it of this pride of place4 ,yet from another point of view the new conception of its position involves a promotion1 since the earth itself is now regarded as a heavenly body of the same order as some of those which shine down upon us4 ,it is amongst them1 and it too moves and shines--shines1 as some of them do1 by reflecting the light of the sun4 ,could we transport ourselves to a neighbouring world1 the earth would seem a star1 not distinguishable in kind from the rest4 ,but as men realized this1 they began to ask3 ,since this world from a distant standpoint must appear as a star1 would not a star1 if we could get near enough to it1 show itself also as a world8 ,this world teems with life2 above all1 it is the home of human life4 ,men and women1 gifted with feeling1 intelligence1 and character1 look upward from its surface and watch the shining members of the heavenly host4 ,are none of these the home of beings gifted with like powers1 who watch in their turn the movements of that shining point which is our world8 ,this is the meaning of the controversy on the ,plurality of ,worlds which excited so much interest some sixty years ago1 and has been with us more or less ever since4 ,it is the desire to recognize the presence in the orbs around us of beings like ourselves1 possessed of personality and intelligence1 lodged in an organic body4 ,this is what is meant when we speak of a world being inhabited4 ,it would not1 for example1 at all content us if we could ascertain that ,jupiter was covered by a shoreless ocean1 rich in every variety of fish2 or that the hard rocks of the ,moon were delicately veiled by lichens4 ,just as no richness of vegetation and no fulness and complexity of animal life would justify an explorer in describing some land that he had discovered as being inhabited if no men were there1 so we cannot rightly speak of any other world as being inhabited if it is not the home of intelligent life4 ,if the life did not rise above the level of algae or oysters1 the globe on which they flourish would be uninhabited in our estimation1 and its chief interest would lie in the possibility that in the course of ages life might change its forms and develop hereafter into manifestations with which we could claim a nearer kinship4 ,on the other hand1 of necessity we are precluded from extending our enquiry to the case of disembodied intelligences1 if such be conceived possible4 ,all created existences must be conditioned1 but if we have no knowledge of what those conditions may be1 or means for attaining such knowledge1 we cannot discuss them4 ,nothing can be affirmed1 nothing denied1 concerning the possibility of intelligences existing on the ,moon or even in the ,sun if we are unable to ascertain under what limitations those particular intelligences subsist4 ,gnomes1 sylphs1 elves1 and fairies1 and all similar conceptions1 escape the possibility of discussion by our ignorance of their properties4 ,as nothing can be asserted of them they remain beyond investigation1 as they are beyond sight and touch4 ,the only beings1 then1 the presence of which would justify us in regarding another world as inhabited are such as would justify us in applying that term to a part of our own world4 ,they must possess intelligence and consciousness on the one hand2 on the other1 they must likewise have corporeal form4 ,true1 the form might be imagined as different from that we possess2 but1 as with ourselves1 the intelligent spirit must be lodged in and expressed by a living material body4 ,our enquiry is thus rendered a physical one2 it is the necessities of the living body that must guide us in it2 a world unsuited for living organisms is not1 in the sense of this enquiry1 a habitable world4 ,the discussion1 as it was carried on sixty years ago by ,dr4 ,whewell and ,sir ,david ,brewster1 was essentially a metaphysical1 almost a theological one1 and it was chiefly considered in its supposed relationship to certain religious conceptions4 ,it was urged that it was derogatory to the wisdom and goodness of the ,creator to suppose that ,he would have created so many great and glorious orbs without having a definite purpose in so doing1 and that the only purpose for which a world could be made was that it might be inhabited4 ,so1 again1 when ,dr4 ,a4 ,r4 ,wallace revived the discussion in #aijc1 he clearly had a theological purpose in his opening paper1 though he was taking the opposite view from that held by ,brewster half a century earlier4 ,for myself1 if there be any theological significance attaching to the solving of this problem1 ,i do not know what it is4 ,if we decide that there are very many inhabited worlds1 or that there are few1 or that there is but one--our own--,i fail to see how it should modify our religious beliefs4 ,for example3 explorers have made their way across the ,antarctic continent to the ,south ,pole but have found no inhabitant there4 ,has this fact any theological bearing8 or if1 on the contrary1 a race of men had been discovered there1 what change would it have made in the theological position of anyone8 ,and if this be so with regard to a new continent on this earth1 why should it be different with regard to the continents of another planet8 ,the problem therefore seems not to be theological or metaphysical1 but purely physical4 ,we have simply to ask with regard to each heavenly body which we pass in review3 ,are its physical conditions1 so far as we can ascertain them1 such as would render the maintenance of life possible upon it8 ,the question is not at all as to how life is generated on a world1 but as to whether1 if once in action on a particular world1 its activities could be carried on4 ,,chapter ,,ii ,,the ,,living ,,organism ,a world for habitation1 then1 is a world whereon living organisms can exist that are comparable in intelligence with men4 ,but men presuppose the existence of living organisms of inferior grades4 ,therefore a world for habitation must first of all be one upon which it is possible for living organisms1 as such1 to exist4 ,it does not concern us in the present connection how life first came into existence on this planet4 ,it is sufficient that we know from experience that life does exist here2 and in whatsoever way it was first generated here1 in that same way we may consider that it could have been generated on another planet4 ,nor need any question trouble us as to the precise line of demarkation to be drawn between inorganic and organic substances1 or amongst the latter1 between plants and animals4 ,these are important subjects for discussion1 but they do not affect us here1 for we are essentially concerned with the highest form of organism1 the one furthest from these two dividing lines4 ,it suffices that living organisms do exist here1 and exist under well-defined conditions4 ,wanting these conditions1 they perish4 ,we can1 to a varying degree1 determine the physical conditions prevailing upon the heavenly bodies1 and we can ascertain whether these physical conditions would be favourable1 unfavourable1 or fatal to the living organism4 ,what is a living organism8 ,a living organism is such that1 though it is continually changing its substance1 its identity1 as a whole1 remains essentially the same4 ,this definition is incomplete1 but it gives us a first essential approximation1 it indicates the continuance of the whole1 with the unceasing change of the details4 ,were this definition complete1 a river would furnish us with a perfect example of a living organism1 because1 while the river remains1 the individual drops of water are continually changing4 ,there is then something more in the living organism than the continuity of the whole1 with the change of the details4 ,an analogy1 given by ,max ,verworn1 carries us a step further4 ,he likens life to a flame1 and takes a gas flame with its butterfly shape as a particularly appropriate illustration4 ,here the shape of the flame remains constant1 even in its details4 ,immediately above the burner1 at the base of the flame1 there is a completely dark space2 surrounding this1 a bluish zone that is faintly luminous2 and beyond this again1 the broad spread of the two wings that are brightly luminous4 ,the flame1 like the river1 preserves its identity of form1 while its constituent details--the gases that feed it--are in continual change4 ,but there is not only a change of material in the flame2 there is a change of condition4 ,everywhere the gas from the burner is entering into energetic combination with the oxygen of the air1 with evolution of light and heat4 ,there is change in the constituent particles as well as change of the constituent particles2 there is more than the mere flux of material through the form2 there is change of the material1 and in the process of that change energy is developed4 ,a steam-engine may afford us a third illustration4 ,here fresh material is continually being introduced into the engine there to suffer change4 ,part is supplied as fuel to the fire there to maintain the temperature of the engine2 so far the illustration is analogous to that of the gas flame4 ,but the engine carries us a step further1 for part of the material supplied to it is water1 which is converted into steam by the heat of the fire1 and from the expansion of the steam the energy sought from the machine is derived4 ,here again we have change in the material with development of energy2 but there is not only work done in the subject1 there is work done by it4 ,but the living organism differs from artificial machines in that1 of itself and by itself1 it is continuously drawing into itself non-living matter1 converting it into an integral part of the organism1 and so endowing it with the qualities of life4 ,and from this non-living matter it derives fresh energy for the carrying on of the life of the organism4 ,the engine and the butterfly gas flame do not give us1 any more than the river1 a complete picture of the living organism4 ,the form of the river is imposed upon it from without2 the river is defined by its bed1 by the contour of the country through which it flows4 ,the form and size of the flame are equally defined by exterior conditions2 they are imposed upon it by the shape of the burner and the pressure of the gas passing through it4 ,the form of the engine is as its designer has made it4 ,but the form of the living organism is imposed upon it from within2 and1 as far as we can tell1 is inherent in it4 ,here is the wonder and mystery of life3 the power of the living organism to assimilate dead matter1 to give it life and bring it into the law and unity of the organism itself4 ,but it cannot do this indiscriminately2 it is not able thus to convert every dead material2 it is restricted1 narrowly restricted1 in its action4 ,one of the chief characteristics of living matter is found in the continuous range of chemical reactions which take place between living cells and their inorganic surroundings4 ,without cease certain substances are taken up and disappear in the endless round of chemical reactions in the cell4 ,other substances which have been produced by the chemical reactions in living matter pass out of the cell and reappear in inorganic nature as waste products of the life process4 ,the whole complex of these chemical transformations is generally called ,metabolism4 ,inorganic matter contrasts strikingly with living substance4 ,however long a crystal or a piece of metal is kept in observation1 there is no change of the substance1 and the molecules remain the same and in the same number4 ,for living matter the continuous change of substances is an indispensable condition of existence4 ,to stop the supply of food material for a certain time is sufficient to cause a serious lesion of the life process or even the death of the cell4 ,but the same happens when we hinder the passing out of the products of chemical transformation from the cell4 ,on the other hand1 we may keep a crystal of lifeless matter in a glass tube carefully shut up from all exchange of substance with the external world for as many years as we like4 ,the existence of this crystal will continue without end and without change of any of its properties4 ,there is no known living organism which could remain in a dry resting state for an infinitely long period of time4 ,the longest lived are perhaps the spores of mosses which can exist in a dry state more than a hundred years4 ,as a rule the seeds of higher plants show their vital power already weakened after ten years2 most of them do not germinate if kept more than twenty to thirty years4 ,these experiences lead to the opinion that even dry seeds and spores of lower plants in their period of rest of vegetation continue the processes of metabolism to a certain degree4 ,this supposition is confirmed by the fact that a very slight respiration and production of carbonic acid can be proved when the seeds contain a small percentage of water4 ,it seems as if life were weakened in these plant organs to a quite imperceptible degree1 but never1 not even temporarily1 really suspended4 ,life is1 therefore1 quite inseparable from chemical reactions1 and on the whole what we call life is nothing else but a complex of innumerable chemical reactions in the living substance which we call protoplasm4#a ,the essential quality1 therefore1 of life is continual change1 but not mere change in general4 ,it is that special process of the circulation of matter which we call metabolism1 and this circulation is always connected with a particular chemical substance--protoplasm4 ,in this substance five elements are always present and predominant--carbon1 oxygen1 nitrogen1 hydrogen1 and sulphur4 ,the compounds which these five elements form with each other are most complex and varied1 and they also admit to combination--but in smaller proportions--some of the other elements1 of which phosphorus1 potassium1 calcium1 magnesium1 and iron are the most important4 ,for protoplasm--using the term in the most general sense--is a chemical substance1 not a mere mixture of a number of chemical elements1 nor a mere mechanical structure4 ,however differently the various plasma substances behave in detail1 they always exhibit the same general composition as the other albuminoids out of the five 'organo-genetic elements'--namely in point of weight1 #ea-ed carbon1 #ba-bc oxygen1 #ae-ag nitrogen1 #f-g hydrogen1 and #a-b sulphur4#b ,haeckel1 the writer just quoted1 describes the plasm1 the universal basis of all the vital phenomena1 in the following terms3 ,in every case where we have with great difficulty succeeded in examining the plasm as far as possible and separating it from the plasma-products1 it has the appearance of a colourless1 viscous substance1 the chief physical property of which is its peculiar thickness and consistency4 ,the physicist distinguishes three conditions of inorganic matter--solid1 fluid1 and gaseous4 ,active living protoplasm cannot be strictly described as either fluid or solid in the physical sense4 ,it presents an intermediate stage between the two which is best described as viscous2 it is best compared to a cold jelly1 or solution of glue4 ,just as we find the latter substance in all stages between the solid and the fluid1 so we find in the case of protoplasm4 ,the cause of this softness is the quantity of water contained in the living matter1 which generally amounts to a half of its volume and weight4 ,the water is distributed between the plasma molecules or the ultimate particles of living matter in much the same way as it is in the crystals of salts1 but with the important difference that it is very variable in quantity in the plasm4 ,on this depends the capacity for the absorption or imbibition in the plasm1 and the mobility of its molecules1 which is very important for the performance of the vital actions4 ,however1 this capacity of absorption has definite limits in each variety of plasm2 living plasm is not soluble in water1 but absolutely resists the penetration of any water beyond this limit4#c ,and ,czapek further tells us that the most striking feature of cell life is the fact that an enormous number of chemical reactions take place within the narrowest space4 ,most plant cells do not exceed #j4a to #j4e millimetres in diameter4 ,their greatest volume therefore can only be an eighth of a cubic millimetre4 ,nevertheless1 in this minute space we notice in every stage of cell life a considerable number of chemical reactions which are carried on contemporaneously1 without one disturbing the other in the slightest degree4#d ,it is clear if organic bodies were built up of chemical compounds of small complexity and great stability that this continuous range of chemical reactions1 this unceasing metabolism1 could not take place4 ,it is therefore a necessary condition for organic substances that they should be built up of chemical compounds that are most complex and unstable4 ,exactly those substances which are most important for life possess a very high molecular weight1 and consequently very large molecules1 in comparison with inorganic matter4 ,for example3 egg-albumin is said to have the molecular weight of at least #ae1jjj1 starch more than #cj1jjj1 whilst the molecular weight of hydrogen is #b1 of sulphuric acid and of potassium nitrate about #ajj1 and the molecular weight of the heaviest metal salts does not exceed about #cjj4e ,to sum up3 the living organism1 whether it be a simple cell1 or the ordered community of cells making up the perfect plant or animal1 is an entity1 a living individual1 wherein highly complex and unstable compounds are unceasingly undergoing chemical reactions1 a metabolism essentially associated with protoplasm4 ,but these complex compounds are1 nevertheless1 formed by the combinations of but a few of the elements now known to us4 ,many writers on the subject of the habitability of other worlds1 from contemplating the rich and apparently limitless variety of the forms of life1 and the diversity of the conditions under which they exist1 have been led to assume that the basis of life must itself also in like manner be infinitely broad and infinitely varied4 ,in this they are mistaken4 ,as we have seen1 the elements entering into the composition of organic bodies are1 in the main1 few in number4 ,the temperatures at which they can exist are likewise strictly limited4 ,but1 above all1 that circulation of matter which we call ,life--the metabolism of vital processes--requires for its continuance the presence of one indispensable factor--,,water4 ,protoplasm itself1 as ,czapek puts it1 is practically an albumin sol2 that is to say1 it is a chemical substance of which the chief constituents are albuminous matter and water1 and the protoplasm can only take from without material dissolved in water2 it can only eject matter in the same way4 ,this osmosis is an indispensable condition in the vital process4 ,and the streaming of protoplasm1 its continual movement in the cell1 can only be carried on in water4 ,,water is the compound of oxygen and hydrogen in the proportion of two atoms of hydrogen to one of oxygen4 ,it is familiar to us in three states3 solid1 liquid1 and gaseous1 or ice1 water1 and steam4 ,but it is only in the liquid state that water is available for carrying on the processes of life4 ,this fact limits the temperatures at which the organic functions can be carried on1 for water under terrestrial conditions is only liquid for a hundred degrees2 it freezes at #j deg4 ,centigrade1 it boils at #ajj deg4 ,centigrade4 ,necessarily1 our experiences are mostly confined within this range1 and therefore we are apt unconsciously to assume that this range is all the range that is possible1 whereas it is but a very small fraction of the range conceivable1 and indeed existing1 in cosmical space4 ,in its liquid state water is a general solvent1 and yet pure water is neutral in its qualities1 both characteristics being essential to its usefulness as a vehicle for the protoplasmic actions4 ,naturally1 this function of water as a solvent can only exist when water is in the liquid state2 solid water1 that is ice1 neither dissolves nor flows2 and water1 when heated to boiling point1 passes into vapour1 and so leaves the organism moistureless1 and therefore dead4 ,it is possible to grind a living organism to a pulp so that the structure of the cells is practically destroyed1 and yet for some reactions which are quite peculiar to life still to show themselves for some appreciable time4 ,but when the cell-pulp is heated to the temperature of boiling water1 these chemical processes cannot be longer observed4 ,what is left may then be considered as definitely dead4 ,water is1 then1 indispensable for the living organism2 but there are two great divisions of such organisms--plants and animals4 ,animals are generally1 but not universally1 free to move1 and therefore to travel to seek their food4 ,but their food is restricted2 they cannot directly convert inorganic matter to their own use2 they can only assimilate organic material4 ,the plant1 on the other hand1 unlike the animal1 can make use of inorganic material4 ,plant life1 therefore1 requires an abundant supply of water in which the various substances necessary for its support can be dissolved2 it must either be in water1 or1 if on land1 there must be an active circulation of water both through the atmosphere and through the soil1 so as to bring to it the food that it requires4 ,animal life presupposes plant life1 for it is always dependent upon it4 ,many writers have assumed that life is very widely distributed in connection with this planet4 ,the assumption is a mistaken one1 as has been well pointed out by ,garrett ,p4 ,serviss1 a charming writer on astronomical subjects3 ,on the ,earth we find animated existence confined to the surface of the crust of the globe1 to the lower and denser strata of the atmosphere1 and to the film of water that constitutes the oceans4 ,it does not exist in the heart of the rocks forming the body of the planet nor in the void of space surrounding it outside the atmosphere4 ,as the ,earth condensed from the original nebula1 and cooled and solidified1 a certain quantity of matter remained at its surface in the form of free gases and unstable compounds1 and1 within the narrow precincts where these things were1 lying like a thin shell between the huge inert globe of permanently combined elements below1 and the equally unchanging realm of the ether above1 life1 a phenomenon depending upon ceaseless changes1 combinations and re-combinations of chemical elements in unstable and temporary union1 made its appearance1 and there only we find it at the present time4#f ,the huge inert globe of permanently combined elements below1 and the equally unchanging realm of the ether above1 offer no home for the living organism2 least of all for the highest of such organisms--,man4 ,both must be tempered to a condition which will permit and favour continual change1 the metabolism which is the essential feature of life4 ,when the earth had to be prepared for the habitation of man1 a veil1 as it were1 of intermediate being was spread between him and its darkness1 in which were joined1 in a subdued measure1 the stability and the insensibility of the earth1 and the passion and perishing of mankind4 ,but the heavens1 also1 had to be prepared for his habitation4 ,between their burning light1--their deep vacuity1 and man1 as between the earth's gloom of iron substance1 and man1 a veil had to be spread of intermediate being2--which should appease the unendurable glory to the level of human feebleness1 and sign the changeless motion of the heavens with the semblance of human vicissitude4 ,between the earth and man arose the leaf4 ,between the heaven and man came the cloud4 ,his life being partly as the falling leaf and partly as the flying vapour4#g ,the leaf and the cloud are the signs of a habitable world4 ,the leaf--that is to say1 plant life1 vegetation--is necessary because animal life is not capable of building itself up from inorganic material4 ,this step must have been previously taken by the plant4 ,the cloud1 that is to say water-vapour1 is necessary because the plant in its turn cannot directly assimilate to itself the nitrogen from the atmosphere4 ,the food for the plant is brought to it by water1 and it assimilates it by the help of water4 ,it is1 therefore1 upon the question of the presence of water that the question of the habitability of a given world chiefly turns4 ,in the physical sense1 man is born of water1 and any world fitted for his habitation must stand out of the water and in the water4 ,,chapter ,,iii ,,the ,,sun ,the ,sun is1 of all the heavenly bodies1 the most impressive1 and has necessarily1 at all times1 attracted the chief attention of men4 ,there are only two of the heavenly bodies that appear to be more than points of light1 only two that show a surface to the naked eye1 and the ,sun1 being so much the brighter of the two1 and the obvious source of all our light and heat1 and the fosterer of vegetation1 readily takes the premier place in interest4 ,in the present day we know too much about the ,sun for anyone to suppose that it can be the home of organic life2 but it is not many years since its habitability was seriously suggested even by so high an authority as ,sir ,william ,herschel4 ,he conceived that it was possible that its stores of light and heat might be confined to a relatively thin shell in its upper atmosphere1 and that below this shell a screen of clouds might so check radiation downward that it would be possible for an inner nucleus to exist which should be cool and solid4 ,this fancied inner globe would then necessarily enjoy perpetual daylight1 and a climate which knew no variation from pole to pole4 ,to its inhabitants the entire heavens would be generally luminous1 the light not being concentrated into any one part of the vault2 and it was supposed that1 ignorant of time1 a happy race might flourish1 cultivating the far-spread solar fields1 in perpetual daylight1 and in the serenity of a perpetual spring that was distracted by no storm4 ,the picture thus conjured up is a pleasing one1 though probably1 to the restless sons of ,earth1 it would seem to suffer somewhat from monotony4 ,but we now know that it corresponds in not a single detail to the actual facts4 ,the study of solar conditions carried on through the last hundred years has revealed to us1 not serenity and peace1 but storm1 stress1 and commotion on the most gigantic scale4 ,but though we now can dismiss from our minds the possibility that the ,sun can be inhabited1 yet it is of such importance to the maintenance of life on this planet1 and by parity of reasoning to life on any other planet1 that a review of its conditions forms a necessary introduction to our subject4 ,further1 those conditions themselves will bring out certain principles that are of necessary application when we come to consider the case of particular planets4 ,the distance of the ,sun from the ,earth is often spoken of as the astronomical unit2 it is the fundamental measure of astronomy1 and all our information as to the sizes and distances of the various planets rests upon it4 ,and1 as we shall shortly see1 the particular problem with which we are engaged--the habitability of worlds--is directly connected with these two factors3 the size of the world in question1 and its distance from the ,sun4 ,the distance of the ,sun has been determined by several different methods the principles of which do not concern us here1 but they agree in giving the mean distance of the ,sun as a little less than #ic1jjj1jjj miles2 that is to say1 it would require #aa1gbj worlds as large as our own to be put side by side in order to bridge the chasm between the two4 ,or a traveller going round the ,earth at its equator would have to repeat the journey #cgcj times before he had traversed a space equal to the ,sun's distance4 ,but knowing the ,sun's distance1 we are able to deduce its actual diameter1 its superficial extent1 and its volume1 for its apparent diameter can readily be measured4 ,its actual diameter then comes out as #hff1djj miles1 or #aji4d times that of the ,earth4 ,its surface exceeds that of the ,earth #aa1igj times2 its volume1 #a1caj1jjj times4 ,but the weight of the ,sun is known as well as its size2 this follows as a consequence of gravitation4 ,for the planets move in orbits under the influence of the ,sun's attraction2 the dimensions of their orbits are known1 and the times taken in describing them2 the amount of the attractive force therefore is also known1 that is to say1 the mass of the ,sun4 ,this is #ccb1jjj times the mass of the ,earth2 and as the latter has been determined as equal to about #f1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj tons that of the ,sun would be equal to #b1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj tons4 ,it will be seen that the proportion of the volume of the ,sun to that of the ,earth is greater than the proportion of its mass to the ,earth's mass--almost exactly four times greater2 so that the mean density of the ,sun can be only one-fourth that of the ,earth4 ,yet1 if we calculate the force of gravity at the surfaces of both ,sun and ,earth1 we find that the ,sun has a great preponderance4 ,its mass is #ccb1jjj times that of the ,earth1 but to compare it with the attraction of the ,earth's surface we must divide by 7#aji4d7b1 since the distance of the ,sun's centre from its surface is #aji4d times as great as the corresponding distance in the case of the ,earth1 and the force of gravity diminishes as the square of the increased distance4 ,this gives the force of gravity at the solar surface as #bg4fe times its power at the surface of the ,earth1 so that a body weighing one ton here would weigh #bg tons #ac cwt4 if it were taken to the ,sun4#h ,this relation is one of great importance when we realize that the pressure of the ,earth's atmosphere is #ad4g lb4 on the square inch at the sea level2 that is to say1 if we could take a column of air one square inch in section1 extending from the surface of the ,earth upwards to the very limit of the atmosphere1 we should find that it would have this weight4 ,if we construct a water barometer1 the column of water required to balance the atmosphere must be #cd feet high1 while the height of the column of mercury in a mercurial barometer is #cj inches high1 for the weight of #cj cubic inches of mercury or of #djh cubic inches of water 7#cd x #ab #djh7 is #ad4g lb4 ,if1 now1 we ascend a mountain1 carrying a mercurial barometer with us we should find that it would fall about one inch for the first #ijj feet of our ascent2 that is to say1 we should have left one-thirtieth of the atmosphere below us by ascending #ijj feet4 ,as we went up higher we should find that we should have to climb more than #ijj feet further in order that the barometer might fall another inch2 and each successive inch1 as we went upward1 would mean a longer climb4 ,at the height of #bgfj feet the barometer would have fallen three inches2 we should have passed through one-tenth of the atmosphere4 ,at the height of #ehjj feet1 we should have passed through one-fifth of the atmosphere1 the barometer would have dropped six inches2 and so on1 until at about three and a third miles above sea level the barometer would read fifteen inches1 showing that we had passed through half the atmosphere4 ,mont ,blanc is not quite three miles high1 so that in ,europe we cannot climb to the height where half the atmosphere is left below us1 and there is no terrestrial mountain anywhere which would enable us to double the climb2 that is to say1 to ascend six and two-third miles4 ,could we do so1 however1 we should find that the barometer had fallen to seven and a half inches2 that the second ascent of three and a third miles had brought us through half the remaining atmosphere1 so that only one-fourth still remained above us4 ,in the celebrated balloon ascent made by ,mr4 ,coxwell and ,mr4 ,glaisher on ,september #e1 #ahfa1 an even greater height was attained1 and it was estimated that the barometer fell at its lowest reading to seven inches1 which would correspond to a height of #ci1jjj feet4 ,but on the ,sun1 where the force of gravity is #bg4fe times as great as at the surface of the ,earth1 it would1 if all the other conditions were similar1 only be necessary to ascend one furlong1 instead of three and a third miles1 in order to reach the level of half the surface pressure1 and an ascent of two furlongs would bring us to the level of quarter pressure1 and so on4 ,if then the solar atmosphere extends inwards1 below the apparent surface1 it should approximately double in density with each furlong of descent4 ,these considerations1 if taken alone1 would point to a mean density of the ,sun not as we know it to be1 less than that of the ,earth1 but immeasurably greater2 but the discordance is sufficiently explained when we come to another class of facts4 ,these relate to the temperature of the ,sun1 and to the enormous amount of light and heat which it radiates forth continually4 ,this entirely transcends our power to understand or appreciate4 ,nevertheless1 the astonishing figures which the best authorities give us may1 by their vastness1 convey some rough general impression that may be of service4 ,thus ,prof4 ,c4 ,a4 ,young puts the total quantity of sunlight as equivalent to #a1ege1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj standard candles4 ,the intensity of sunlight at each point of the ,sun's surface is variously expressed as #aij1jjj times that of a standard candle1 #ecjj times that of the metal in a ,bessemer converter1 #adf times that of a calcium light1 or1 #c4d times that of an electric arc4 ,the same authority estimates at #cj calories the value of the ,solar ,constant2 that is to say1 the heat which1 if our atmosphere were removed1 would be received from the ,sun in a minute of time upon a square metre of the ,earth's surface that had the ,sun in its zenith1 would be sufficient to raise the temperature of a kilogram of water #cj degrees ,centigrade4 ,this would involve that the heat radiation from each square metre of the ,sun's surface would equal #a1cdj1jjj calories2 or sufficient to melt through in each minute of time a shell of ice surrounding the ,sun to the thickness of #eh4b feet4 ,prof4 ,abbot's most recent determination of the solar constant diminishes these estimates by one third2 but he still gives the probable temperature of the solar surface as not far short of #gjjj degrees ,centigrade1 or about #ab1jjj degrees ,fahrenheit4 ,the ,sun1 then1 presents us with temperatures and pressures which entirely surpass our experience on the ,earth4 ,the temperatures1 on the one hand1 are sufficient to convert into a permanent gas every substance with which we are acquainted2 the pressures1 on the other hand1 apart from the high temperatures1 would probably solidify every element1 and the ,sun1 as a whole1 would present itself to us as a comparatively small solid globe1 with a density like that of platinum4 ,with both factors in operation1 we have the result already given3 a huge globe1 more than one hundred times the diameter of the ,earth1 yet only one-fourth its density1 and gaseous probably throughout the whole of its enormous bulk4 ,what effect have these two factors1 so stupendous in scale1 upon its visible surface8 ,what is the appearance of the ,sun8 ,it appears to be a large glowing disc1 sensibly circular in outline1 with its edge fairly well-defined both as seen in the telescope and as registered on photographs4 ,in the spectroscope1 or when in an eclipse of the ,sun the ,moon covers the whole disc1 a narrow serrated ring is seen surrounding the rim1 like a velvet pile of a bright rose colour4 ,this crimson rim1 the sierra or chromosphere as it is usually called1 is always to be found edging the entire ,sun1 and therefore must carpet the surface everywhere4 ,but under ordinary conditions1 we do not see the chromosphere itself1 but look down through it on the photosphere1 or general radiating surface4 ,this1 to the eye1 certainly looks like a definite shell1 but some theorists have been so impressed with the difficulty of conceiving that a gaseous body like the ,sun could1 under the conditions of such stupendous temperatures as there exist1 have any defined limit at all1 that they deny that what we see on the ,sun is a real boundary1 and argue that it only appears so to us through the effects of the anomalous refraction or dispersion of light4 ,such theories introduce difficulties greater and more numerous than those that they clear away1 and they are not generally accepted by practical observers of the ,sun4 ,they seem incompatible with the apparent structure of the photosphere1 which is everywhere made up of a complicated mottling3 minute grains somewhat resembling those of rice in shape1 of intense brightness1 and irregularly scattered4 ,this mottling is sometimes coarsely1 sometimes finely textured2 in some regions it is sharp and well defined1 in others misty or blurred1 and in both cases they are often arranged in large elaborate patterns1 the figures of the pattern sometimes extending for a hundred thousand miles or more in any direction4 ,the rice-like grains or granules of which these figures are built up1 and the darker pores between them1 are1 on the other hand1 comparatively small1 and do not1 on the average1 exceed two to four hundred miles in diameter4 ,but the ,sun shows us other objects of quite a different order in their dimensions4 ,here and there the bright granules of the photosphere become disturbed and torn apart1 and broad areas are exposed which are relatively dark4 ,these are sunspots1 and in the early stages of their development they are usually arranged in groups which tend to be stretched out parallel to the ,sun's equator4 ,a group of spots in its later stages of development is more commonly reduced to a single round1 well-defined1 dark spot4 ,these groups1 when near the edge of the ,sun1 are usually seen to be accompanied by very bright markings1 arranged in long irregular lines1 like the foam on an incoming tide4 ,these markings are known as the faculae1 from their brightness4 ,in the spectroscope1 when the serrated edges of the chromosphere are under observation1 every now and then great prominences1 or tongues and clouds of flame1 are seen to rise up from them1 sometimes changing their form and appearance so rapidly that the motion can almost be followed by the eye4 ,an interval of fifteen or twenty minutes has frequently been sufficient to transform1 quite beyond recognition1 a mass of flame fifty thousand miles in height4 ,sometimes a prominence of these1 or even greater1 dimensions has formed1 developed1 risen to a great distance from the ,sun1 and completely disappeared within less than half an hour4 ,the velocity of the gas streams in such eruptions often exceeds one hundred miles a second2 sometimes1 though only rarely1 it reaches a speed twice as great4 ,sunspots do not offer us examples of motions of this order of rapidity1 but the areas which they affect are not less astonishing4 ,many spot groups have been seen to extend over a length of one hundred thousand1 or one hundred and fifty thousand miles1 and to cover a total area of a thousand million square miles4 ,indeed1 the great group of ,february1 #aije1 at its greatest extent1 covered an area four times as great as this4 ,again1 in the normal course of the development of a spot group1 the different members of the group frequently show a kind of repulsion for each other in the early stages of the group's history1 and the usual speed with which they move away from each other is three hundred miles an hour4 ,the spots1 the faculae1 the prominences1 are all1 in different ways1 of the nature of storms in an atmosphere2 that is to say1 that1 in the great gaseous bulk of the ,sun1 certain local differences of constitution1 temperature1 and pressure are marked by these different phenomena4 ,from this point of view it is most significant that many spots are known to last for more than a month2 some have been known to endure for even half a year4 ,the nearest analogy which the ,earth supplies to these disturbances may be found in tropical cyclones1 but these are relatively of far smaller area1 and only last a few days at the utmost1 while a hundred miles an hour is the greatest velocity they ever exhibit1 and this1 fortunately1 only under exceptional circumstances4 ,for a wind of such violence mows down buildings and trees as a scythe the blades of grass2 and were tornadoes moving at a rate of #cjj miles an hour as common upon the ,earth as spots are upon the ,sun1 it would be stripped bare of plants and animals1 as well as of men and of all their works4 ,it is not an accident that the ,sun1 when storm-swept1 shows this violence of commotion1 but a necessary consequence of its enormous temperature and pressures4 ,as we have seen1 the force of gravity at its surface is #bg4fe times that at the surface of the ,earth1 where a body falls #af4a feet in the first second of time2 on the ,sun1 therefore1 a body would fall #dde feet in the first second2 and the atmospheric motions generally would be accelerated in the same proportion4 ,the high temperatures1 the great pressures1 the violent commotions which prevail on the ,sun are1 therefore1 the direct consequence of its enormous mass4 ,the ,sun is1 then1 not merely the type and example of the chief source of light and heat in a given planetary system2 it indicates to us that size and mass are the primary tokens by which we may judge the temperature of a world1 and the activity to be expected in its changes4 ,,chapter ,,iv ,,the ,,distribution ,,of ,,the ,,elements ,,in ,,space ,it is now an old story1 but still possessing its interest1 how ,fraunhofer analysed the light of the ,sun by making it pass through a narrow slit and a prism1 and found that the broad rainbow-tinted band of light so obtained was interrupted by hundreds of narrow dark lines1 images in negative of the slit2 and how ,kirchhoff succeeded in proving that two of these dark lines were caused by the white light of the solar photosphere having suffered absorption at the ,sun by passing through a stratum of glowing sodium vapour4 ,from that time forward it has been known that the ,sun is surrounded by an atmosphere of intensely heated gases1 among which figure many of those elements familiar to us in the solid form on the ,earth1 such as iron1 cobalt1 nickel1 copper1 manganese1 and the like4 ,these metals1 here the very types of solid bodies1 are permanent gases on the ,sun4 ,the ,sun1 then1 is in an essentially gaseous condition1 enclosed by the luminous shell which we term the photosphere4 ,this shell ,prof4 ,c4 ,a4 ,young and the majority of astronomers regard as consisting of a relatively thin layer of glowing clouds1 justifying the quaint conceit of ,r4 ,a4 ,proctor1 who spoke of the ,sun as a ,bubble2 that is1 a globe of gas surrounded by an envelope so thin in comparison as to be a mere film4 ,there has been much difference of opinion as to the substance forming these clouds1 but the theory is still widely held which was first put forward by ,dr4 ,johnstone ,stoney in #ahfg1 that they are due to the condensation of carbon1 the most refractory of all known elements4 ,prof4 ,abbot1 however1 refuses to believe in a surface of this nature1 holding that the temperature of the ,sun is too high even at the surface to permit any such condensation4 ,the application of the spectroscope to astronomy is not confined to the ,sun1 but reaches much further4 ,the stars also yield their spectra1 and we are compelled to recognize that they also are suns2 intensely heated globes of glowing gas1 rich in the same elements as those familiar to us on the ,earth and known by their spectral lines to be present on the ,sun4 ,the stars1 therefore1 cannot themselves be inhabited worlds any more than the ,sun1 and at a stroke the whole of the celestial luminaries within the furthest range of our most powerful telescopes are removed from our present search4 ,only those members of our solar system that shine by reflecting the light of the ,sun can be cool enough for habitation2 the true stars cannot be inhabited1 for1 whatever their quality and order1 they are all suns1 and must necessarily be in far too highly heated a condition to be the abode of life4 ,many of them may1 perhaps1 be a source of light and heat to attendant planets1 but there is no single instance in which such a planet has been directly observed2 no dark1 non-luminous body has ever been actually seen in attendance on a star4 ,many double or multiple stars are known1 but these are all instances in which one sun-like body is revolving round another of the same order4#i ,we see no body shining by reflected light outside the limits of the solar system4 ,planets to the various stars may exist in countless numbers1 but they are invisible to us1 and we cannot discuss conditions where everything is unknown4 ,enquiry in such a case is useless1 and speculation vain4 ,the stars1 as revealed to us by the spectroscope are all of the same order as the ,sun1 but they are not all of the same species4 ,quite a large number of stars1 of which ,arcturus is one of the best-known examples1 show spectra that are essentially the same as that of the ,sun1 but there are other stars of which the spectra bear little or no semblance to it4 ,nevertheless1 it remains true that1 on the whole1 stellar spectra bear witness to the presence of just the same elements as we recognize in the ,sun1 though not always in the same proportions or in the same conditions--hydrogen1 calcium1 sodium1 magnesium1 iron1 titanium1 and many more are recognized in nearly all4 ,it is true that not all the known terrestrial elements have yet been identified in either ,sun or stars2 but1 in general1 those missing are either negative elements like the halogens1 or elements of great atomic weight like mercury and platinum4 ,that elements of one class should1 as a rule1 reveal their presence in ,sun and stars wherever these are placed1 and1 correspondingly1 that other classes should as generally fail to show themselves1 indicate that such absence is more likely to be due to the general structure of the stellar photospheres and reversing layers than to any irregularity in the distribution of matter in the universe4 ,it is easy1 for example1 to conceive that the heavy metals may lie somewhat deeper down within the ,sun or star than those of low atomic weight4 ,in the case of the ,sun1 there seems a clear connection between atomic weight and the distinctness with which the element is recognized in the spectrum of the photosphere1 the lower atomic weights showing themselves more conspicuously4 ,it is clear that not all elements present in a ,sun or star show themselves in its spectrum4 ,oxygen is very feebly represented by its elemental lines1 but the flutings of titanium oxide are found in sunspots1 and with great distinctness in a certain type of stars4 ,nitrogen1 too1 though not directly recognized1 proves its presence by the lines of cyanogen4 ,the case of helium is one of particular interest2 this element was recognized by a very bright yellow line in the solar prominences before it was known to exist on the ,earth2 indeed1 it received the name helium because it then seemed to be a purely solar constituent4 ,now it is seen as a strong absorption line in the spectrum of many stars2 but for some reason it is not in general seen as an absorption line over the ,sun's disc1 and if our ,sun were removed to such distance so as to appear to us only as a star1 we should have no evidence that it contained any helium at all4 ,so far1 then1 as the evidence of the spectroscope goes1 the elements present in the ,earth are present throughout the whole extent of the universe within our view3 the same elements and with the same qualities4 ,for the lines of the spectrum of an element are the revelation of its innermost molecular structure1 so that we can confidently affirm that hydrogen and oxygen on ,sirius1 ,arcturus1 or the ,sun1 are essentially the same elements as hydrogen and oxygen on the ,earth4 ,on a planet attached to any of these stars1 the two gases would combine together to form water under just the same conditions as they do here on the ,earth2 and at suitable temperatures that water would be a neutral liquid1 capable of dissolving just the same chemical substances that it does here4 ,it would freeze as it does here2 it would evaporate as it does here2 it would be water as completely in all its qualities and conditions as earthly water is4 ,and what applies to one element or compound applies to all4 ,throughout the whole extent of space1 the same building materials have been employed1 and throughout they retain the same qualities4 ,hydrogen is seen in the spectra of nearly all stars1 and also in those of nebulae4 ,the elemental lines of oxygen are not indeed seen in stellar spectra1 but that the element is present is shown by the flutings of titanium oxide which distinguish stars like ,antares4 ,nitrogen and carbon again are not recognized by their elemental lines1 but the lines of cyanogen are seen in the spectra of comets and of sunspots1 and hydrocarbon flutings in the spectra of comets and red stars2 while in a few of the hottest stars even sulphur has recently been identified4#aj ,all the five organo-genetic elements are therefore abundantly diffused through space2 the materials for protoplasm1 the albuminous substance with water1 are at hand everywhere4 ,this being so1 it is reasonable to infer that if organic life exists elsewhere than on this ,earth1 its essential feature1 there as here1 is the metabolism of nitrogenous carbon compounds in association with protoplasm4 ,but it is objected that we are not yet able to identify all the lines in solar or stellar spectra2 may not some of these lines be due to elements of which we know nothing here1 and may not such new elements form complex and unstable compounds with each other1 or with some of those familiar to us1 that would take the place of the five organo-generators1 and so give rise to a physical basis of life1 different from that we know on this ,earth8 ,but the development of ,mendeleeff's ,periodic ,law has shown that the elements are not to be regarded as disconnected entities4 ,the ,law as given in ,mendeleeff's own words1 runs3 ,the properties of the elements as well as the forms and properties of their compounds are in periodic dependence on1 or 7expressing ourselves algebraically7 form a periodic function of the atomic weights of the elements4 ,in other words1 they form a series1 not only as it regards their atomic weights1 but also as it regards their own properties and the forms and properties of their compounds4 ,we are no longer at liberty1 as we might have been many years ago1 to call into fancied existence new elements having no relation in their properties and compounds to those with which we are acquainted4 ,new elements1 no doubt1 will be discovered in the future1 as in the past2 and indeed we may be able to discover them and learn their atomic weights and properties without ever being able to handle them in a terrestrial laboratory4 ,in a series of remarkable papers communicated to the ,royal ,astronomical ,society during the past year 7#aiaa-aiab71 ,dr4 ,j4 ,w4 ,nicholson has given the result of his computation of the positions of the spectral lines of two elements of simple structure1 and has found that the resulting lines correspond1 for one dynamical system1 to the chief unidentified lines observed in the spectra of nebulae1 and for the other1 to the chief unidentified lines in the spectrum of the corona4 ,the latter element is probably associated with the halogens1 but of much lower atomic weight 7namely1 #a4c71 than fluorine2 he therefore gives it the name of ,protofluorine4 ,the other element1 to which he gives the name ,nebulium1 will have an atomic weight of #b4a4 ,prof4 ,max ,wolf1 of ,heidelberg1 has recently pointed out#aa the evidence of the presence of two other unknown gases in the ,ring nebula in ,lyra1 and there is no reason to suppose that the process of discovery has come to an end4 ,but we cannot imagine that we shall discover any new elements that are more abundant and more universally diffused than the five which give us protoplasm--the physical basis of life4 ,to take an analogy from the solar system3 many hundreds of planetoids have now been discovered between the orbits of ,mars and ,jupiter1 and probably many hundreds more remain to be discovered2 but of one thing we are certain1 that none of the planetoids yet to be discovered will be of the same rank as either of those two guardians1 ,mars and ,jupiter1 who revolve on the confines of the planetoidal zone4 ,indeed1 ,ceres1 the planetoid first discovered1 has a greater mass than the aggregate of all discovered since1 and probably of all that exist in the zone4 ,water is essential for life here1 but the quality in water which restricts the range of terrestrial life is that it freezes at #j deg4 ,centigrade1 and boils at #ajj deg4 ,centigrade2 it is only in the liquid state during the intermediate range of #ajj degrees4 ,in order to extend the range for living organisms1 we should have1 therefore1 to discover a new vehicle1 that1 possessing all the other qualities of water1 is not restricted to the liquid state within the same limits4 ,but we are at once met with the difficulty that the first essential for the vehicle is that it should be abundant1 and there are no other elements more abundant than hydrogen and oxygen4 ,this new vehicle must1 like water1 be both neutral and stable1 or it would itself interfere with the highly unstable compounds that are a necessity for metabolism4 ,and1 if we could find this new vehicle1 liquid at temperatures outside the #j deg4 to #ajj deg4 ,centigrade1 have we any reason to suppose that protoplasm itself would be able to endure these outlying temperatures8 ,looking through the range of substances available1 we can only say that none other presents itself as approaching water in suitability for its essential office4 ,if we1 ourselves1 were able to create a vehicle1 could we imagine one more perfectly suited8 ,,chapter ,v ,,the ,,moon ,the ,sun and ,moon offer to our sight almost exactly the same apparent diameters2 to the eye1 they look the same size4 ,but as we know the ,sun to be #djj times as distant as the ,moon1 it is necessarily #djj times as large2 its surface must exceed that of the ,moon by the square of #djj1 or #afj1jjj2 its volume by the cube of #djj1 or #fd1jjj1jjj4 ,as the ,sun is of low mean density1 its mass does not exceed that of the ,moon in quite the same high ratio2 but it is equal in mass to #bg1jjj1jjj moons4 ,compared with the ,sun1 the ,moon is therefore an insignificant little ball--a mere particle2 but as a world for habitation it possesses some advantages over the ,sun4 ,the first glance at it in a telescope is sufficient to assure the observer that he is looking at a solid1 substantial globe4 ,it is not only substantial1 it is rugged2 its surface is broken up into mountains1 hills1 valleys1 and plains2 the mountains stand out in sensible relief2 it looks like a ball of solid silver boldly embossed and chased4 ,so far all is to the good for the purpose of habitation4 ,wherever men are1 they must have a solid platform on which to stand2 they must have a stable terrene whereon their food may grow1 and this the ,moon could supply4 ,the ,earth's gloom of iron substance is necessary for man here1 and the ,moon appears to offer a like stability4 ,another favourable condition is that we know that the ,moon receives from the ,sun a sufficient supply of light and heat4 ,each square yard of its surface receives1 on the average1 the same amount of light and heat that would fall upon a square yard on the ,earth that was presented towards the ,sun at the same inclination2 and we know from our own experience that this is sufficient for the maintenance of life4 ,and the ,moon is near enough for us to subject her to a searching scrutiny4 ,every part of the hemisphere turned toward us has been repeatedly examined1 measured1 and photographed2 to that extent our knowledge of its topography is more complete than of the world on which we live4 ,there are no unexplored regions on our side of the ,moon4 ,the great photographs taken in recent years at the observatories of ,paris and of the ,university of ,chicago have shown thousands of crater-pits1 not more than a mile across2 and narrow lines on the ,moon's surface have been detected with a breadth less than one-tenth of this4 ,an elevation on the ,moon1 if it rose up abruptly from an open plain1 would make its presence apparent by the shadow which it would cast soon after sunrise or near sunset2 in this way an isolated building1 if it were as large as the great pyramid of ,ghizeh1 would also show itself1 and all our great towns and cities would be apparent as areas of indistinct mottling1 though the details of the cities would not be made out4 ,but if vegetation took the same forms on the ,moon as on the ,earth1 and passed through the same changes1 we should have no difficulty in perceiving the evidence of its presence4 ,if we were transported to the ,moon and turned our eyes earthward1 we should not need the assistance of any telescope in order to detect terrestrial changes which would be plainly connected with the seasonal changes of vegetation4 ,the ,earth would present to us a disc four times the apparent diameter of the ,moon1 and on that disc ,canada would offer as great an area as the whole of the ,moon does to us4 ,we could easily follow with the naked eye the change from the glittering whiteness of the aspect of ,canada when snow-covered in winter1 to the brown1 green and gold which would succeed each other during the brighter months of the year4 ,and this type of change would alternate between the northern and southern hemispheres1 for the winter of ,canada is the summer of the ,argentine1 and conversely4 ,we ought1 therefore1 to have no difficulty in observing seasonal changes on the ,moon1 if such take place4 ,but nothing of the kind has ever been remarked2 no changes sufficiently pronounced for us to be sure of them are ever witnessed4 ,here and there some slight mutations have been suspected1 nearly all accomplishing their cycle in the course of a lunar day2 so that it is difficult to separate them from changes purely apparent1 brought about by the change in the incidence of the illumination4 ,the difference in appearance of a given area on the ,moon when viewed under a low ,sun and when the ,sun is on the meridian is very striking4 ,in the first case everything is in the boldest relief2 the shadows are long and intensely black2 the whole area under examination in the telescope seems as if it might be handled4 ,under the high ,sun1 the contrasts are gone2 the scenery appears flat1 many of the large conspicuous markings are only recognized with difficulty4 ,thus the terse remark of ,maedler1 ,the full ,moon knows no ,maginus1 has become a proverb amongst selenographers2 yet ,maginus is a fine walled plain some eighty miles in diameter1 and its rampart attains a height in parts of #ad1jjj feet4 ,maginus lies near ,tycho1 which has been well named the lunar metropolis1 for from it radiates the principal system of bright streaks conspicuous on the full ,moon4 ,these white streaks appear when the shadows have vanished or are growing short2 they are not seen under a low ,sun4 ,the changes which appear to take place in the lunar formations owing to the change in their illumination are much more striking and varied than would be anticipated4 ,but the question arises whether all the changes that are associated with the progress of the lunar day can be ascribed to this effect4 ,thus1 ,prof4 ,w4 ,h4 ,pickering writes concerning a well-known pair of little craters of about nine miles in diameter1 known as ,messier and ,messier ,a1 situated side by side not far from the centre of the ,mare ,fecunditatis4 ,when the ,sun rises first on them1 the eastern one1 ,a1 is triangular and larger than ,messier1 which latter is somewhat pear-shaped4 ,about three days after sunrise they both suddenly turn white1 ,messier rapidly grows in size1 soon surpasses ,a1 and also becomes triangular in shape4 ,six days after sunrise the craters are again nearly of the same size1 owing to the diminution of ,messier4 ,the shape of ,a has become irregular1 and differs in different lunations4 ,at nine days after sunrise the craters are exactly alike in size and shape1 both now being elliptical1 with their major axes lying in a nearly ,n4 and ,s4 direction4 ,just before sunset ,a is again the larger1 being almost twice the size of ,messier4#ab ,some observers explain this cycle of changes as due merely to the peculiar contour of the two objects1 the change in the lighting during the lunar day altering their apparent figures4 ,prof4 ,w4 ,h4 ,pickering1 on the other hand1 while recognizing that some portion of the change of shape is probably due to the contour of the ground1 conceives that1 in order to explain the whole phenomenon1 it is necessary to suppose that a white layer of hoar frost is formed periodically round the two craters4 ,it is also alleged that whereas ,maedler described the two craters as being exactly alike eighty years ago1 ,messier ,a is now distinctly the larger2 but it is very doubtful whether ,maedler's description can be trusted to this degree of nicety4 ,if it could1 this would establish a permanent change in the actual structure of the lunar surface at this point4 ,there are several other cases of the same order of ambiguity4 ,the most celebrated is ,linne1 a white spot about six miles in diameter on the ,mare ,serentatis4 ,this object appears to change in size during the progress of the lunar day1 and1 as with ,messier1 some selenographers consider that it has also suffered an actual permanent change in shape within the last sixty or seventy years4 ,here again the evidence is not decisive2 ,neison is by no means convinced that a change has taken place1 yet does not think it impossible that ,linne may once have been a crater with steep walls which have collapsed into its interior through the force of gravity4 ,another type of suspected change is associated with the neighbourhood of ,aristarchus1 the brightest formation on the ,moon1 so bright indeed that ,sir ,william ,herschel1 observing it when illuminated by earthshine in the dark portion of the ,moon1 thought that he was watching a lunar volcano in eruption4 ,in #ahig1 on ,september #ba1 the late ,major ,molesworth noticed that the crater was at that time under the rays of the setting ,sun1 and filled with shadow1 and the inner terraces1 which should have been invisible1 were seen as faint1 knotted1 glimmering streaks under both the eastern and western walls1 and the central peak was also dimly discernible4 ,he thought this unusual lighting up of rocks on which the ,sun had already set might be due either to phosphorescence produced by long exposure to the ,sun's rays1 or to inherent heat1 or to reflected glare from the western rampart4 ,still more important1 both ,major ,molesworth and ,mr4 ,walter ,goodacre1 each on more than one occasion1 observed what seemed to be a faint bluish mist on the inner slope of the east wall1 soon after sunrise1 but this was visible only for a short time4 ,other selenographers too1 on rare occasions1 have made observations accordant with these1 relating to various regions on the ,moon4 ,these1 and a few other similar instances1 are all that selenography has to offer by way of evidence of actual lunar change4 ,of seeming change there is abundance1 but beyond that we have only cases for controversy1 and one of the most industrious of the present-day observers of the ,moon1 ,m4 ,philip ,fauth1 declares that as a student of the ,moon for the last twenty years1 and as probably one of the few living investigators who have kept in practical touch with the results of selenography1 he is bound to express his conviction that no eye has ever seen a physical change in the plastic features of the ,moon's surface4#ac ,in this matter of change1 then1 the ,earth and ,moon stand in the greatest contrast to each other4 ,as we have seen1 from the view-point of the ,moon1 the appearance of the ,earth would change so manifestly with the progress of the seasons that no one could fail to remark the difference1 even though observing with the naked eye4 ,but from the view-point of the ,earth1 the ,moon when examined by our most experienced observers1 armed with our most powerful telescopes1 offers us only a few doubtful enigmatical instances of possible change confined to small isolated localities2 we see no evidence that the gloom of iron substance below is ever concealed by a veil of changing vegetation1 or that between the burning light and deep vacuity of the heavens above1 the veil of the flying vapour has ever been spread out4 ,we see the ,moon so clearly that we are assured it holds no water to nourish plant life2 we see it so clearly because there is no air to carry the vapour that might dim our view4 ,life is change1 and a planet where there is no change1 or where that change is very small1 can be no home for life4 ,the stability and insensibility are indeed required in the platform upon which life is to appear1 but there must be the presence of the passion and the perishing1 or life will be unable to find a home4 ,we infer the absence of water and air from the ,moon not only from the unchanging character of its features and the distinctness with which we see them2 we are able to make direct observations4 ,galileo1 the first man to observe the ,moon to better advantage than with the naked eye1 was not long before he decided that the ,moon contained no water1 for though ,milton1 in a well-known passage1 makes ,galileo discover ,rivers or mountains on her spotty globe1 ,galileo himself wrote3 ,i do not believe that the body of the ,moon is composed of earth and water4 ,the name of maria was given to the great grey plains of the ,moon by ,hevelius1 but this was simply for convenience of nomenclature1 not because he actually believed them to be seas4 ,one observation is1 in itself1 sufficient to prove that the maria are not water surfaces4 ,the ,moon's terminator1 that is to say1 the line dividing the part in sunlight from that in darkness1 is clearly irregular when it passes over the great plains2 were they actually sea it would be a bright line and perfectly smooth4 ,the grey plains are therefore not expanses of water now1 nor were they in time past4 ,it is obvious that in some remote antiquity their surface was in a fluid condition1 but it was the fluidity of molten rock4 ,this is seen by the way in which the maria have invaded1 breached1 broken down1 and submerged many of the circular formations on their margins4 ,thus the ,mare ,humorum has swept away half the wall of the rings1 ,hippalus and ,doppelmayer1 and far out in the open plain of the ,mare ,nubium1 great circles like ,kies1 and that immediately north of ,flamsteed1 stand up in faint relief as of half-submerged rings4 ,clearly there was a period after the age in which the great ring mountains and walled plains came into existence1 when an invasive flood attacked and partially destroyed a large proportion of them4 ,and the flood itself evidently became more viscous and less fluid the further it spread from its original centre of action1 for the ridges and crumpling of the surface indicate that the material found more and more difficulty in its flow4 ,we have evidence just as direct that there is no atmosphere4 ,this is very strikingly shown when the ,moon1 in its monthly progress among the stars1 passes before one of them and occults it4 ,such an occultation is instantaneous1 and is particularly impressive when either a disappearance or a reappearance occurs at the defective limb2 that is to say1 at the limb which is not illuminated by the ,sun1 and is therefore invisible4 ,the observer may have a bright star in the field of view1 showing steadily in a cloudless sky2 there is not a hint of a weakening in its light2 suddenly it is gone4 ,the first experience of such an observation is most disconcerting2 it is hardly less disconcerting to observe the reappearance at the dark limb4 ,one moment the field of view of the telescope is empty2 the next1 without any sort of dawning1 a bright star is shining steadily in the void1 and it almost seems to the observer as if an explosion had taken place4 ,if the ,moon had an atmosphere extending upwards from its surface in all directions and of any appreciable density1 an occultation would not be so exceedingly abrupt2 and1 in particular1 if the occultation were watched through a spectroscope1 then1 at the disappearance1 the spectrum of the star would not vanish as a whole1 but the red end would go first1 and the rest of the spectrum would be swept out of sight successively1 from orange to the violet4 ,this does not happen2 the whole spectrum goes out together1 and it is clear that no appreciable atmosphere can exist on the ,moon4 ,in actual observation so inappreciable is it that its density at the ,moon's surface is variously estimated as #a_/cjjth of that of the ,earth by ,neison1 and as #a_/ajjjjth by ,w4 ,h4 ,pickering4 ,if the ,moon possessed an atmosphere bearing the same proportion to her total mass as we find in the case of the ,earth1 she would have a density of one-fortieth of our atmosphere at the sea level4 ,the ,moon is at the same mean distance from the ,sun as the ,earth1 and therefore1 surface for surface1 receives from it on the average the same amount of light and heat4 ,but it makes a very different use of these supplies4 ,bright as the ,moon appears when seen at the full on some winter night1 it has really but a very low power of reflection1 and is only bright by contrast with the darkness of the midnight sky4 ,if the full ,moon is seen in broad daylight1 it is pale and ghost-like4 ,sir ,john ,herschel has put it on record that when in ,south ,africa he often had the opportunity of comparing the ,moon with the face of ,table ,mountain1 the ,sun shining full upon both1 and the ,moon appeared no brighter than the weathered rock4 ,the best determinations of the albedo of the ,moon1 that is to say1 of its reflective power1 give it as #j4ag1 so that only one-sixth of the incident light is reflected1 the other five-sixths being absorbed4 ,it is difficult to obtain a good determination of the ,earth's albedo1 but the most probable estimate puts it as about #j4ej1 or three times as great as that of the ,moon4 ,this high reflective power is partly to be accounted for by the great extent of the terrestrial polar caps1 but chiefly by the clouds and dust layer always present in its atmosphere4 ,a larger proportion1 therefore1 of the solar rays are employed in heating the soil of the ,moon than in heating that of the ,earth1 and in this connection the effect of an important difference between the two worlds must be noted4 ,the ,earth rotates on its axis in #bc hours #ef minutes #d seconds1 the mean length of its rotation as referred to the ,sun being #bd hours4 ,the rotation of the ,moon1 on the other hand1 takes #bg days #g hours #dc minutes to accomplish1 giving a mean rotation1 as referred to the ,sun1 of #bi days #ab hours #dd minutes4 ,the lunar surface is therefore exposed uninterruptedly to the solar scorching for very nearly fifteen of our days at a time1 and it is1 in turn1 exposed to the intense cold of outer space for an equal period4 ,as the surface absorbs heat so readily1 it must radiate it as quickly2 hence radiation must go on with great rapidity during the long lunar night4 ,lord ,rosse and ,prof4 ,very have both obtained measures of the change in the lunar heat radiation during the progress of a total eclipse of the ,moon1 with the result that the heat disappeared almost completely1 though not quite at the same time as the light4 ,prof4 ,langley succeeded in obtaining from the ,moon1 far down in the long wave lengths of the infra-red1 a heat spectrum which was only partly due to reflection from the ,sun2 part coming from the lunar soil itself1 which1 having absorbed heat from the ,sun1 radiated it out again almost immediately4 ,in #ahih1 ,prof4 ,very1 following up ,langley's line of work1 concluded that the temperature of the lunar soil must range through about #cej deg4 ,centigrade1 considerably exceeding #ajj deg4 at the height of the lunar day1 and falling to about the temperature of liquid air during the lunar night4 ,so wide a range of temperature must be fatal to living organisms1 particularly when the range is repeated at short1 regular intervals of time4 ,but this range of temperature comes directly from the length of the ,moon's rotation period2 for the longer the day of the ,moon1 the higher the temperature which may be attained in it2 the longer the night1 the greater the cold which will in turn be experienced4 ,we learn1 therefore1 that the time of rotation of a planet is an important factor in its habitability4 ,,chapter ,,vi ,,the ,,canals ,,of ,,mars ,both of the two worlds best placed for our study are thus1 for different reasons1 ruled out of court as worlds for habitation4 ,the ,sun by its vastness1 its intolerable heat and the violence of its changes1 has to be rejected on the one hand1 while the ,moon1 so small1 and therefore so rigid1 unchanging and bare1 is rejected on the other4 ,of the other heavenly bodies1 the planet ,mars is the one that we see to best advantage4 ,two other planets1 ,eros and ,venus1 at times come nearer to us1 but neither offers us on such occasions equal facilities for their examination4 ,but of ,mars it has been asserted not only that it is inhabited1 but that we know it to be the case1 since the evidence of the handiwork of intelligent beings is manifest to us1 even across the tremendous gulf of forty or more million miles of space4 ,a claim so remarkable almost captures the position by its audacity4 ,there is a natural desire among men to believe the marvellous1 and the very boldness of the assertion goes no small way to overcome incredulity4 ,and when we consider how puny are men as we see them on this our planet1 how minute their greatest works1 how superhuman any undertaking would be which could demonstrate our existence to observers on another planet1 we must admit that it is a marvel that there should be any evidence forthcoming that could bear one way or another on the solution of a problem so difficult4 ,the first fact that we have to remember with regard to the planet ,mars is the smallness of its apparent size4 ,to the eye it is nearly a star--a point of light without visible surface4 ,it is almost twice the size of the ,moon in actual diameter1 but as its mean distance from the ,earth is #fjj times that of the ,moon1 its mean apparent diameter is #cjj times smaller4 ,we cannot1 however1 watch ,mars in all parts of its orbit2 it is best placed for observation1 and1 therefore1 most observed1 when in opposition1 and oppositions may be favourable or unfavourable4 ,at the most favourable opposition1 ,mars is #adj times as distant as the ,moon2 at the least favourable1 #bfj times2 so that on such occasions its apparent size varies from #a_/gjth of the diameter of the ,moon to #a_/acjth4 ,but a telescope with a magnifying power of #gj could never1 under the most perfect conditions1 show ,mars1 even in the closest opposition1 as well as the ,moon is seen with the naked eye1 for the practical magnifying power of a telescope is never as great as the theoretical4 ,in practice1 a child's spy-glass magnifying some six diameters will show the full ,moon to better advantage than ,mars has ever been seen1 even in our most powerful telescopes4 ,the small apparent size of the planet explains how it was that ,galileo does not seem to have been able to detect any markings upon it4 ,in #afei1 ,huyghens laid the foundation stone of areography by observing some dark spots1 and determining from their apparent movements that the planet had a rotation on its axis1 which it accomplished in about the same time as the ,earth4 ,small and rough as are the drawings that ,huyghens made1 the identification of one or two of his spots is unmistakable4 ,seven years later1 in #afff1 both ,cassini and ,hooke made a number of sketches1 and those by ,hooke have been repeatedly used in modern determinations of the rotation period of the planet4 ,the next great advance was made by ,sir ,william ,herschel1 who1 during the oppositions of #aggg1 #aggi1 #agha1 and #aghc1 determined the inclination of the axis of ,mars to the plane of its orbit1 measured its polar and equatorial diameters1 and ascertained the amount of the polar flattening4 ,he paid also special attention to two bright white spots upon the planet1 and he showed that these formed round the planet's poles and increased in size as the winter of each several hemisphere drew on and diminished again with the advance of summer1 behaving therefore as do the snow caps of our own polar regions4 ,the next stage in the development of our knowledge of ,mars must be ascribed to the two ,german astronomers1 ,beer and ,maedler1 who made a series of drawings in the years #ahcj1 #ahcb and #ahcg1 by means of a telescope of #d inches aperture1 from which they were able to construct a chart of the entire globe4 ,this chart may be considered classic1 for the features which it represents have been observed afresh at each succeeding opposition4 ,mars1 therefore1 possesses a permanent topography1 and some of the markings in question can be identified1 not only in the rough sketches made by ,sir ,william ,herschel1 but even in those made by ,hooke and ,cassini as far back as the year #afff4 ,in the forty years that followed1 the planet was studied by many of the most skilled observers1 particularly by ,mr4 ,j4 ,n4 ,lockyer in #ahfb1 and the ,rev4 ,w4 ,r4 ,dawes in #ahfd4 ,in #ahgg1 the late ,mr4 ,n4 ,e4 ,green1 drawing-master to ,queen ,victoria1 and a distinguished painter in water colours1 made a series of sketches of the planet from a station in the island of ,madeira #bjjj feet above sea-level4 ,when the opposition was over1 ,mr4 ,green collected together a large number of drawings1 and formed a chart of the planet1 much richer in detail than any that had preceded it1 and from his skill1 experience and training as an artist he reproduced the appearance of the planet with a fidelity that had never been equalled before and has never been surpassed since4 ,at this time it was generally assumed that ,mars was a miniature of our own world4 ,the brighter districts of its surface were supposed to be continents1 the darker1 seas4 ,as ,sir ,william ,herschel had already pointed out long before1 the little world evidently had its seasons1 its axis being inclined to the plane of its orbit at much the same angle as is the case with the ,earth2 it had its polar caps1 presumably of ice and snow2 its day was but very little longer than that of the ,earth2 and the only important difference seemed to be that it had a longer year1 and was a little further off the ,sun4 ,but the general conclusion was that it was so like the ,earth in its conditions that we had practically found out all that there was to know2 all that seemed to be reserved for future research was that a few minor details of the surface might be filled in as the power of our telescopes was increased4 ,but fortunately for progress1 this sense of satisfaction was to be rudely disturbed4 ,as ,mars1 in its progress round the ,sun1 receded from the ,earth1 or rather as the ,earth moved away from it1 the astronomers who observed so diligently during the autumn of #ahgg turned their attention to other objects4 ,one of them1 however1 ,schiaparelli1 the most distinguished astronomer on the continent of ,europe1 still continued to watch the planet1 and1 as the result of his labours1 he published some months later the first of a magnificent series of ,memoirs1 bringing to light what appeared to be a new feature4 ,his drawings not only showed the lands and seas1 that is to say the bright and dark areas1 that ,green and his predecessors had drawn1 but also a number of fine1 narrow1 dark lines crossing the lands in every direction4 ,these narrow lines are the markings which have since been so celebrated as the canals of ,mars1 and the discussion as to the real nature of these canals has focussed attention upon ,mars in a way that1 perhaps1 nothing else could have done4 ,before #ahgg the study of planetary markings was left almost entirely to the desultory labours of amateurs1 skilled though many of them were2 since #ahgg1 the most powerful telescopes of the great public observatories of the world have been turned upon ,mars1 and the most skilful and experienced of professional astronomers have not been ashamed to devote their time to it4 ,there is no need to pass in review the whole of the immense mass of observations that have been accumulated since ,schiaparelli brought out the first of his great ,memoirs4 ,that ,memoir gave rise to an immediate controversy1 for many astronomers of skill and experience had observed the planet in #ahgg without detecting the network of lines which ,schiaparelli had revealed1 and it was natural that they should feel some reluctance in accepting results so strange and novel4 ,but little by little this controversy has passed4 ,we now know that the canals vary much in their visibility1 and curiously enough the canals are most conspicuous1 not at the time the planet is nearest to the ,earth and its general features are in consequence best seen1 but as the planet goes away the canals come out4 ,the fact is that the orbital position and the seasonal epoch conspire to a masking of the phenomena4 ,this was the chief reason why ,schiaparelli's discoveries seemed at first to stand so entirely without corroboration2 the canals did not become conspicuous until after most observers had desisted from following the planet4 ,another reason was that1 in #ahgg1 ,mars was low down in the sky for northern observatories1 and good definition is an essential for their recognition4 ,but the careful examination of drawings made in earlier oppositions1 especially those made by ,dawes and ,green1 afforded confirmation of not a few of ,schiaparelli's canals2 even in #ahgg a few of the easiest and most conspicuous had been delineated by other astronomers before any rumour of ,schiaparelli's work had come abroad1 and as ,mars came under observation again and again at successive oppositions1 the number of those who were able to verify ,schiaparelli's discoveries increased4 ,it has now long been known that the great ,italian astronomer was not the victim of a mere optical illusion2 there were actual markings on the planet ,mars where he had represented them2 markings which1 when seen under like conditions and with equal instrumental equipment1 did present the appearance of straight1 narrow lines4 ,the canals of ,mars are not mere figments of the imagination1 but have a real objective basis4 ,as this controversy has passed away1 another and a very different one has arisen out of an unfortunate mistranslation of the term chosen by ,schiaparelli to indicate these linear streaks4 ,in conformity with the type of nomenclature adopted by previous areographers who had divided ,mars into seas1 continents1 islands1 isthmuses1 straits and the like1 ,schiaparelli had called the narrow lines he detected canali1 that is to say channels1 but without intending to convey the idea of artificial construction4 ,indeed1 he himself was careful to point out that these designations were not intended to prejudge the nature of the spot1 and were nothing but an artifice for helping the memory and for shortening descriptions4 ,and he added1 ,we speak in the same way of the lunar seas1 although we well know that there are no true seas on the ,moon4 ,but canali was unhappily rendered in ,english as canals1 instead of channels4 ,channel would have left the nature of the marking an open question1 but1 in ,english1 canal means an artificial waterway4 ,here then the question as to whether or no ,mars is inhabited comes definitely before us4 ,have we sufficient grounds for believing that the canals are artificial constructions1 or may they be merely natural formations8 ,in #ahid1 ,mr4 ,percival ,lowell founded at ,flagstaff1 ,arizona1 ,u4,s4,a41 a well-equipped observatory for the special study of ,mars1 and he has continued his scrutiny of the planet from that time to the present with the most unrelaxing perseverance4 ,the chief results that he has obtained have been the detection of many new canals2 the discovery of a number of dark1 round dots1 termed by him oases1 at the junctions of the canals2 and the demonstration that the canals and certain of the dusky regions are subject to strictly seasonal change1 as really as the polar caps themselves4 ,in addition1 he has formed the conclusion1 which he has supported with much ingenuity and skill1 that the regularity of the canals and oases quite precludes the possibility of their being natural formations4 ,hence there has arisen the second controversy3 that on the nature of the canals2 for ,mr4 ,lowell considers that their presence proves the existence of inhabitants on ,mars1 who1 by means of a ,titanic system of irrigation1 are fighting a losing battle against the gradual desiccation of their planet4 ,in a paper published in the ,international ,scientific ,review1 ,scientia1 in ,january1 #aiaj1 ,mr4 ,lowell gave a summary of his argument4 ,organic life needs water for its existence4 ,this water we see exists on ,mars1 but in very scant amount1 so that if life of any sort exists there1 it must be chiefly dependent on the semi-annual unlocking of the polar snows for its supply1 inasmuch as there are no surface bodies of it over the rest of the planet4 ,now the last few years1 beginning with ,schiaparelli in #ahgg1 and much extended since at ,flagstaff1 have shown3 ,the surface of the planet to be very curiously meshed by a fine network of lines and spots4 ,now if one considers first the appearance of this network of lines and spots1 and then its regular behaviour1 he will note that its geometrism precludes its causation on such a scale by any natural process and1 on the other hand1 that such is precisely the aspect which an artificial irrigating system1 dependent upon the melting of the polar snows1 would assume4 ,since water is only to be had at the time it is there unlocked1 and since for any organic life it must be got1 it would be by tapping the disintegrated cap1 and only so1 that it could be obtained4 ,if ,mars be inhabited1 therefore1 it is precisely such a curious system we should expect to see1 and only by such explanation does it seem possible to account for the facts4 ,these lines are the so-called canals of ,mars4 ,it is not supposed that what we see is the conduit itself4 ,on the contrary1 the behaviour of these lines indicates that what we are looking at is vegetation4 ,now1 vegetation can only be induced by a water-supply4 ,what we see resembles the yearly inundation of the ,nile1 of which to a spectator in space the river itself might be too narrow to be seen1 and only the verdured country on its banks be visible4 ,this is what we suppose to be the case with ,mars4 ,however the water be conducted1 whether in covered conduits1 which seems probable1 or not1 science is not able to state1 but the effects of it are so palpable and so exactly in accord with what such a system of irrigation would show1 that we are compelled to believe that such is indeed its vera causa4 ,beside the bulky ,memoirs in which ,prof4 ,lowell has published the scientific results obtained at his observatory at ,flagstaff1 and papers and articles appearing in various scientific journals1 he has brought out three books of a more popular character3 ,mars2 ,mars and its ,canals2 and ,mars as the ,abode of ,life4 ,in these he shows that to the assiduity of the astronomer he adds the missionary's zeal and eagerness for converts as he pleads most skilfully for the acceptance of his chosen doctrine of the presence of men on ,mars4 ,in the last of the three books mentioned1 he deals directly with ,proofs of ,life on ,mars4 ,the presence of vegetation may be inferred from seasonal changes of tint1 just as an observer on the ,moon might with the naked eye watch effects on the ,earth4 ,but though vegetable life could thus reveal itself directly1 animal life could not4 ,not by its body but by its mind would it be known4 ,across the gulf of space it could be recognized only by the imprint it had made on the face of ,mars4 ,confronting the observer are lines and spots that but impress him the more1 as his study goes on1 with their non-natural look4 ,so uncommonly regular are they1 and on such a scale as to raise suspicions whether they can be by nature regularly produced 7p4 #ahh74 444 ,unnatural regularity1 the observations showed1 betrays itself in everything to do with the lines3 in their surprising straightness1 their amazing uniformity throughout1 their exceeding tenuity1 and their immense length 7p4 #ahi74 ,as a planet ages1 its surface water grows scarce4 ,its oceans in time dry up1 its rivers cease to flow1 its lakes evaporate 7p4 #bjc74444 ,now1 in the struggle for existence1 water must be got4444 ,its procuring depends on the intelligence of the organisms that stand in need of it4444 ,as a planet ages1 any organisms upon it will share in its development4 ,they must evolve with it1 indeed1 or perish4 ,at first they change only1 as environment offers opportunity1 in a lowly1 unconscious way4 ,but1 as brain develops1 they rise superior to such occasioning4444 ,the last stage in the expression of life upon a planet's surface must be that just antecedent to its dying of thirst4444 ,with an intelligent population this inevitable end would be long foreseen4444 ,both polar caps would be pressed into service in order to utilize the whole available supply and also to accommodate most easily the inhabitants of each hemisphere 7pp4 #bjd-aa74 ,that intelligence should thus mutely communicate its existence to us across the far reaches of space1 itself remaining hid1 appeals to all that is highest and most far-reaching in man himself4 ,more satisfactory than strange this2 for in no other way could the habitation of the planet have been revealed4 ,it simply shows again the supremacy of mind4444 ,thus1 not only do the observations we have scanned lead us to the conclusion that ,mars at this moment is inhabited1 but they land us at the further one that these denizens are of an order whose acquaintance was worth the making 7p4 #bae74 ,for the moment1 let us leave ,prof4 ,lowell's argument as he puts it4 ,whether we accept it or not1 it remains that it is a marvellous achievement of the optician's skill and the observer's devotion that from a planet so small and so distant as ,mars any evidence should be forthcoming at all that could bear upon the question of the existence of intelligent organisms upon its surface4 ,but it is of the utmost significance to note that the whole question turns upon the presence of water--of water in the liquid state1 of water in a sufficient quantity2 and the final decision1 for ,mr4 ,lowell's contention1 or against it1 must turn on that one point4 ,the search for ,life on ,mars is essentially a search for ,water2 a search for water1 not only in the present state of ,mars1 but in its past as well4 ,for1 without water in sufficient quantities in the past1 life on ,mars could not have passed through the evolutionary development necessary to its attaining its highest expression1--that where the material living organism has become the tabernacle and instrument of the conscious intelligent spirit4 ,,chapter ,,vii ,,the ,,condition ,,of ,,mars ,the planet ,mars is the debatable ground between two opinions4 ,here1 the two opposing views join issue2 the controversy comes to a focus4 ,the point in debate is whether certain markings--some linear1 some circular--are natural or artificial4 ,if1 it is argued1 some are truly like a line1 without curve or break1 as if drawn with pen1 ink1 and ruler2 or others1 so truly circular1 without deviation or break1 as if drawn with pen1 ink1 and compass2 if1 moreover1 when we obtain more powerful telescopes1 erected in better climates for observing1 these markings become more truly lines and circles the better we see them2 then they are artificial1 not natural structures4 ,but artificial structures imply artificers4 ,and if the structures are so designed as to meet the needs of a living organism1 it implies that the living organism that designed them must have a reasonable mind lodged in a natural body4 ,if1 then1 the lines and circles that ,prof4 ,lowell and his disciples assert to be artificial canals and oases are really such1 they premise the order of being that we call ,man4 ,but these canals and oases also premise the liquid that we call ,water--water that flows and water utilized in cultivation4 ,in this chapter we will leave out of count the first premiss--,man--and only deal with what concerns the second premiss--,water2 with water that flows and is utilized in vegetation4 ,,planetary ,,statistics ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------- ,minor ,inner ,planets4 ---------------------------------------- -------------------------- ,ceres ,moon ,mercury ---------------------------------------- -------------------------- ,,proportions ,,of ,,the ,,planets3-- ,diameter in miles #dgg #bafc #cjcj ,symbol #a #j4jf #j4bgc #j4chc ,surface1 ,symbol #a #j4jjd #j4jge #j4adg ,volume1 ,symbol #a #j4jjjb #j4jb #j4jf ,density1 ,water #a #b4h 8 #c4ci #d4gb ,symbol #a #j4e 8 #j4fa #j4he ,mass1 ,symbol #a #j4jjja #j4jab #j4jdh ,gravity at surface1 ,symbol #a #j4jbh #j4ag #j4cc ,rate of ,fall1 ,feet in the ,first ,second #j4de #b4gc #e4cj ,albedo #j4ad #j4ag #j4ad ,,details ,,of ,,orbit3-- ,mean ,distance from ,sun in millions of miles#beg4a #ib4i #cf4j ,earth's distance #a #b4gfg #a4jjj #j4chg ,period of ,revolution1 in years #d4fj #a4jj #j4bd ,velocity1 in miles per second #aa4a #ah4e #i4g ,eccentricity #j4jgfc #j4jafh #j4bjef ,aphelion ,distance1 ,perihelion #a #a4aeg #a4jcd #a4eag ,inclination of ,equator to ,orbit 787 #a deg44#cb' 787 d h m d ,rotation period 787 #bg4g4dc #hh787 ,,atmosphere1 assuming the total mass of the atmosphere to be proportional to the mass of the planet3-- ,pressure at the surface in lb4 per sq4 in4 #j4jad #j4dj #a4f in atmospheres #j4jjji #j4jbg #j4ajh ,level of half surface pressure in miles #aai4j #ai4f #aj4a ,boiling point of water at the surface #bb deg4,c #ec deg4,c ,,temperature3-- ,light and heat received from ,sun1 ,symbol #a #j4ac #a4jj #f4fg ,reciprocal of square-root of distance1 ,symbol #a #j4fj #a4jj #a4fa ,equatorial temp4 of ideal planet1 ,absolute #ahh #cab deg4 #ejb deg4 ,centigrade -#fe #ci #bbi ,average temp4 of ideal planet1 ,absolute #agd #bij #dfg ,centigrade -#ii #ag #aid ,upper limit under zenith sun1 ,absolute #bdh #dab #ffd ,centigrade -#be #aci #cia ,average temp4 of equivalent disc1 ,absolute #bbc #cga #eih ,centigrade -#ej #ih #cbe ---------------------------------------- -------------------------- ---------------------------------------- ------------------------ ,planets4 ,outer ,planets4 ---------------------------------------- ------------------- ,mars ,venus ,earth ,uranus ,neptune ,saturn ,jupiter ---------------------------------------- ------------------- #dbcj #ggjj #giah #caijj #cdhjj #gcjjj #hfejj #j4ecd #j4igb #a4jjj #d4jbi #d4cie #i4bai #aj4ibd #j4bhe #j4ide #a4jjj #af4b #ai4c #he4j #aai4c #j4ae #j4ib #a4jj #fe4 #he4 #gfj4 #acjd4 #c4ib #d4id #e4ee #a4bb #a4aa #j4gb #a4cb #j4ga #j4hi #a4jj #j4bb #j4bj #j4ac #j4bd #j4ajg #j4hbj #a4jjj #ad4f #ag4j #id4h #cag4g #j4ch #j4hg #a4jj #j4ij #j4hi #a4ah #b4fe #f4aa #ac4ii #af4jh #ad4dg #ad4ca #ah4ig #db4fa #j4bb #j4gf #j4ej8 #j4fj #j4eb #j4gb #j4fb #ada4e #fg4b #ib4i #agha4i #bgia4f #hhf4j #dhc4c #a4ebd #j4gbc #a4jjj #ai4ahc #cj4jee #i4eci #e4bjc #a4hh #j4fb #a4jj #hd4jb #afd4gh #bi4df #aa4hf #ae4j #ba4i #ah4e #d4b #c4d #f4j #h4a #j4jicc #j4jjfh #j4jafh #j4jdfc #j4jjij #j4jefa #j4jdhc #a4bjg #a4jac #a4jcd #a4jig #a4jah #a4ajg #a4aja #bd deg44#j' 787 #bc deg44#bg' 787 787 #bf deg44#di' #c deg44#e' h m s h m s h m h m h m #bd4cg4bc 787 #bc4ef4d #i4cj787 787 #aj4ad- #i4ee- #b4a #aa4a #ad4g #aa4i #aa4e #ai4d #ajc4h #j4adc #j4ged #a4jjj #j4ha #j4gh #a4cb #g4jf #h4h #c4h #c4c #c4g #c4h #b4h #a4c #ec deg4,c #ib deg4,c #ajj deg4,c #id deg4,c #ic deg4,c #ajh deg4,c #aff deg4,c #j4dc #a4ia #a4jj #j4jjc #j4jja #j4jaa #j4jcg #j4ha #a4ah #a4jj #j4bc #j4ah #j4cb #j4dd #bec deg4 #cfh deg4 #cab deg4 #ga deg4 #ef deg4 #aja deg4 #acg deg4 -#bj #ie #ci -#bjb -#bag -#agb -#acf #bce #cdb #bij #ff #eb #id #abg -#ch #fi #ag -#bjg -#bba -#agi -#adf #ccg #dhf #dab #id #gd #acc #ahj #fd #bac #aci -#agi -#aii -#adj -#ic #cjj #dch #cga #hd #fg #abj #afb #bg #afe #ih -#ahi -#bjf -#aec -#aaa ---------------------------------------- ------------------- ,for in regard to this particular premiss we can do away with hypothesis1 and deal only with certain physical facts that are not controversial and are not in dispute4 ,the first of this series of facts concerning ,mars about which there can be no controversy or dispute relates to its size and mass4 ,as the foregoing ,table shows1 it comes between the ,moon and the ,earth in these respects4 ,the figures show at a glance that ,mars ranks in its dimensions between the ,moon and the ,earth1 and that1 on the whole1 it is more like to the ,moon than it is to the ,earth4 ,but in what way would this affect ,mars as a suitable home for life8 ,in many ways2 and amongst these the distribution of its atmosphere and the sluggishness of its atmospheric circulation are not the least important4 ,it was mentioned in ,chapter ,,iii that at a height of about three and a third miles the barometer will stand at #ae inches1 or half its mean height at sea level1 showing that one half the atmosphere has been passed through4 ,mont ,blanc1 the highest mountain in ,europe1 is under #c miles in height1 so that it is not possible1 in ,europe1 to climb to the level of half-pressure2 ,mt4 ,everest1 the highest mountain in the world1 is not quite six miles high1 so that no part of the solid substance of our planet reaches up to the level of the quarter pressure4 ,on a very few occasions daring aeronauts have soared into the empyrean higher than the summits of even our loftiest mountains1 but the excursion has been a dangerous one1 and they have with difficulty brought their life back from so rare and cold1 so inhospitable a region4 ,when ,gay-,lussac1 in #ahjd1 attained a height of #bc1jjj feet above sea level1 the thermometer1 which on the ground read #ca deg4 ,c41 sank to #i deg4 below zero1 and the rare atmosphere was so dry that paper crumpled up as if it had been placed near the fire1 and his pulse rose to #abj pulsations a minute instead of his normal #ff4 ,when ,mr4 ,glaisher and ,mr4 ,coxwell made their celebrated ascent between #a and #b o'clock on the afternoon of ,september #e1 #ahfa1 they found that at a height of #ba1jjj feet the temperature sank to -#aj4d deg42 at #bf1jjj feet to -#ae4b deg42 and at #ci1jjj feet the temperature was down to -#af4j deg4 ,c4 ,at this height the rarefaction of the air was so great and the cold so intense that ,mr4 ,glaisher fainted1 and ,mr4 ,coxwell's hands being rendered numb and useless by the cold1 he was only able to bring about their descent in time by pulling the string of the safety valve with his teeth4 ,yet when they attained this height they were far above all cloud or mist1 and the ,sun's rays fell full upon them4 ,the ,sun's rays had all the force that they had at the surface of the ,earth1 but in the rare atmosphere of seven miles above the ,earth1 the radiation from every particle not in direct sunlight was so great that while the right hand1 exposed to the ,sun1 might burn1 the left hand1 protected from his direct rays1 might freeze4 ,but gravity at the surface of ,mars is much feebler than at the surface of the ,earth1 and in order to reach the level of half-pressure a ,martian mountaineer would have to climb1 not three and a third miles1 but eight and three-quarter miles2 that is to say1 the distance to be ascended is in the inverse proportion of the force of gravity at the surface of the planet4 ,the atmosphere of ,mars1 therefore1 is much deeper than that of the ,earth1 and one great cause of precipitation here is much weakened there4 ,a current of air heavily laden with moisture1 if it encounters a range of mountains1 is forced upwards1 and consequently expands1 owing to the diminished pressure4 ,the expansion brings about a cooling1 and from both causes the atmosphere is unable to retain as much water-vapour as it carried before4 ,on ,mars1 the same relative expansion and cooling would only follow if the ascent were nearly three times as great1 and the feeble force of gravity has its effect in another way2 for just as a weight on ,mars will only fall six feet in the first second as against sixteen on the ,earth1 so a dense and heavy column of air will fall with proportionate slowness and a light column ascend in the same languid manner4 ,an ascending current on ,mars would therefore take #a_/j4ch x #a_/j4ch #a_/j4ade1 or seven times as long to attain the same relative expansion as on the ,earth4 ,the winds of ,mars are therefore sluggish1 and precipitation is slight4 ,so far at least it resembles ,the island valley of ,avilion2 ,where falls not hail1 or rain1 or any snow1 ,nor ever wind blows loudly2 and ,r4 ,a4 ,proctor1 acute and accurate writer on planetary physics as he was1 fell into a mistake when he referred to ,mars as being hurricane-swept4 ,there are no hurricanes on ,mars2 its fiercest winds can never exceed in violence what a sailor would call a capful4 ,this holds good for ,mars1 but it also holds good for every planet where the force of gravity at the surface is relatively feeble4 ,the greater the force of gravity the more active the atmospheric circulation1 and more violent its disturbances2 the feebler the action of gravity the more languid the circulation1 and the slighter the disturbances4 ,the atmosphere of ,mars is relatively deeper than that of the ,earth1 so that we1 in observing the details of its surface1 are looking down through an immense thickness of an obscuring medium4 ,and yet the details of the surface are seen with remarkable distinctness2 not as clearly indeed as we can see those of the ,moon1 but nearly so4 ,for instance1 the canals appear to have a breadth of from #ae to #bj miles1 corresponding to #a_/afth1 and #a_/abth1 of a second of arc1 at an average opposition4 ,the oases1 as a rule1 are about #abj miles in diameter1 that is to say about half a second of arc4 ,these are extraordinarily fine details to be perceived and held1 even if ,mars had no atmosphere at all2 it would certainly be impossible to detect them unless the atmosphere were exceedingly thin and transparent4 ,for we must remember that1 though our own atmosphere is a hindrance to our observing1 yet the atmosphere of the planet into which we are looking is a greater hindrance still4 ,like the lace curtains of the window of a house1 it is a much greater obstacle to looking inward than to looking outward1 and as the perfect distinctness with which we see the ,moon is a proof that it is practically without an atmosphere1 so the great detail visible on ,mars bears unmistakable testimony to the slightness of the atmospheric veil around that planet4 ,and when we turn again to the statistics of ,mars1 we see that this must inevitably be the case4 ,of two planets1 one heavier than the other1 it is not possible to suppose that the lighter should secure the greater proportional amount of atmosphere4 ,with planets1 as with persons1 it is the most powerful that gets the lion's share3 to him that hath it is given1 and from him that hath not is taken away even that which he seemeth to have4 ,but if we assume that ,mars has acquired an atmosphere proportional to its mass1 then we see from the ,table that this must be a little less than #a_/ith of that of the ,earth2 exactly #j4ajg4 ,it is distributed over a smaller surface1 #j4bhe4 ,consequently the amount of air above each square inch of ,martian surface is #j4ajg _/ #j4bhe #j4ch4 ,but since the force of gravity at the surface of ,mars is less than on the ,earth1 this column of air will only weigh #j4ch x #j4ch #j4ade2 or one-seventh of the column of air resting on a square inch of the ,earth's surface4 ,the pressure at the surface of ,mars will therefore be #b4a lb42 and the aneroid barometer would read #d4c inches4 7,in order to express the diminished pressure of the ,martian atmosphere1 it is necessary to refer it to the aneroid barometer4 ,the mercury in a mercurial barometer1 or the water in a water barometer would lose in weight in consequence of the diminished force of gravity in the same proportion as the air would1 and the mercurial barometer would read #aa4d inches47 ,but a pressure of #b4a lb4 on the square inch is far less than that experienced by ,coxwell and ,glaisher in their great ascent2 it is about one-half the pressure that is experienced on the top of the very highest terrestrial mountains4 ,but the habitable regions of the ,earth do not extend even so far upward as to the level of a pressure of #g4c lb4 on the square inch2 that is1 of half the terrestrial surface pressure4 ,plant life dies out before we reach that point1 and though birds or men may occasionally attain greater heights1 they cannot domicile there1 and are1 indeed1 only able thus to ascend in virtue of nourishment which they have procured in more favoured regions4 ,if we could suppose the conditions of the whole ,earth changed to correspond with those prevailing at the summit of ,mt4 ,everest1 or even at the summit of ,mont ,blanc1 it is clear that the life now present on this planet would be extinguished1 and that speedily4 ,much more would this be the case if the atmosphere were diminished to one half the pressure on the summit of the highest earthly mountain4 ,the tenuity of the atmosphere on ,mars has another consequence4 ,here water freezes at #j deg4 ,c4 and boils at #ajj deg4 ,c42 so that for one hundred degrees it remains in a liquid condition4 ,on ,mars1 under the assumed conditions1 water would boil at #ec deg4 ,c41 and the range of temperature within which it would be liquid would be much curtailed4 ,but it is only water in the liquid state that is useful for sustaining life4 ,the above estimate of the density of the atmosphere of ,mars is an outside limit1 for it assumes that ,mars has retained an atmosphere to the full proportion of its mass4 ,but as the molecules of a gas are in continual motion1 and in every direction1 the lighter1 most swiftly moving molecules must occasionally be moving directly outwards from the planet at the top of their speed1 and in this case1 if the speed of recession should exceed that which the gravity of the planet can control1 the particle is lost to the planet for ever4 ,a small planet therefore is subject to a continual drain upon its atmosphere1 a drain of the lightest constituents4 ,hence it is1 no doubt1 that free hydrogen is not a constituent of the atmosphere of the ,earth4 ,to what extent1 then1 has the atmosphere of ,mars fallen below its full proportion8 ,mr4 ,lowell has adopted an ingenious method of obtaining some light on this question1 by comparing the relative albedoes of the ,earth and ,mars2 that is to say the relative power of reflection possessed by the two planets4 ,of course the method is rough2 we have first of all no satisfactory means of determining the albedo of the ,earth itself1 and ,mr4 ,lowell puts it higher than most astronomers would do2 then there is the difficulty of determining what portion of the total albedo is to be referred to the atmosphere and what to the actual soil or surface of the planet4 ,but1 on the whole1 ,mr4 ,lowell concludes that the amount of atmosphere above the unit of surface of ,mars is #j4bbb of that above the unit of surface of the ,earth4 ,this would bring down the pressure on each square inch of ,mars to #a4b lb41 and the aneroid barometer would read #b4e inches2 and water would boil at #dd deg4 ,c4 ,the range of temperature from day to night1 from summer to winter1 at any place on the planet would be increased1 while the range within which water could retain its liquid form would be diminished4 ,these statistics may seem rather dull and tiresome1 but if we are to deal with the problem before us at all1 it is important to understand that one factor in the condition of a planet cannot be altered and all the other factors retained unchanged4 ,it will be seen that in computing the density of the atmosphere of ,mars1 we had to take into consideration not only the diameter of the planet1 but the surface1 which varies as the square of the diameter2 the volume1 which varies as the cube2 the mass1 which varies in a higher power still2 and various combinations of these numbers4 ,novelists who write tales of journeys to other worlds or of the inhabitants of other worlds visiting this one1 usually assume that the atmosphere is of the same density on all planets1 and the action of gravity unchanged4 ,in their view it is only that men would have a little less ground to walk upon on ,mars1 and a good deal more on ,jupiter4 ,dean ,swift1 in ,gulliver's ,travels1 made the ,lilliputians take a truer view of the effect of the alteration of one dimension1 for1 finding that ,gulliver was twelve times as tall as the average ,lilliputian1 they did not appoint him the rations of twelve ,lilliputians1 which would have been rather poor feeding for that veracious mariner1 but allotted him the cube of twelve1 viz4 seventeen hundred and twenty-eight rations4 ,mr4 ,j4 ,holt ,schooling1 in one of his ingenious and interesting statistical papers1 tried to bring home the vast extent of the ,british ,empire by supposing that it seceded1 and taking the portion of ,earth that has fallen to it1 set up a world of its own--the planet ,victoria4 ,he allots to the ,british ,empire #ba per cent of the land surface of the world4 ,if the ,earth were divided so as to form two globes with surfaces in proportion of #ba to #gi1 the smaller globe1 which would correspond to ,mr4 ,schooling's new planet ,victoria1 would be less than half the present ,earth in diameter2 it would be considerably smaller than ,mars4 ,but the rest of the world would be #j4if of the present ,earth in diameter1 or very nearly the size of ,venus1 and it would contain just eight-ninths of the substance of the ,earth1 leaving only one-ninth for ,victoria4 ,the statistics given above will suggest to the reader that1 could such a secession be carried out1 the inhabitants of the ,british ,empire would not be happier for the change during the very short continued existence that remained to them4 ,the rest of the world could spare our fraction of the planet much better than we could spare theirs4 ,this is a principle which applies to worlds anywhere2 not merely within the limits of the solar system but wherever they exist4 ,everywhere the surface must vary with the square of the diameter2 the volume with the cube2 everywhere the smaller planet must have the rarer atmosphere1 and with a rare atmosphere the extreme range of temperature must be great1 while the range of temperature within which water will flow will be restricted4 ,our ,earth stands as the model of a world of the right size for the maintenance of life2 much smaller than our ,earth would be too small2 much larger1 as we shall see later1 would be too large4 ,so far we have dealt with ,mars as if it received the same amount of light and heat from the ,sun that the ,earth does4 ,but1 as the ,table shows1 from its greater distance from the ,sun1 ,mars receives per unit of surface only about three-sevenths of the light and heat of that received by the ,earth4 ,the inclination of the axis of ,mars is almost the same as that of the ,earth1 so that the general character of the seasons is not very different on the two planets1 and the torrid1 temperate1 and frigid zones have almost the same proportions4 ,the length of the day is also nearly the same for both1 the ,martian day being slightly longer2 but the most serious factor is the greater distance of ,mars1 and the consequent diminution in the light and heat received from the ,sun4 ,the light and heat received by the ,earth are not so excessive that we could be content to see them diminished1 even by #e per cent1 but for ,mars they are diminished by #eg per cent4 ,how can we judge the effect of so important a difference8 ,the mean temperature of our ,earth is supposed to be about #fj deg4,f41 or #af deg4,c4 ,three-sevenths of this would give us #g deg4,c4 as the mean temperature of ,mars1 which would signify a planet not impossible for life4 ,but the zero of the ,centigrade scale is not the absolute zero2 it only marks the freezing-point of water4 ,the absolute zero is computed to be -#bgc deg4 on the ,centigrade scale2 the temperature of the ,earth on the absolute scale therefore should be taken as #bhi deg41 and three-sevenths of this would give #abd deg4 of absolute temperature4 ,but this is #adi deg4 below freezing-point1 and no life could exist on a planet under such conditions4 ,but the mean temperature of ,mars cannot be computed quite so easily4 ,the hotter a body is the more rapidly it radiates heat2 the cooler it is the slower its radiation4 ,according to ,stefan's ,law1 the radiation varies for a perfect radiator with the #dth power of the absolute temperature2 so that if ,mars were at #abd deg4 abs41 while the ,earth were at #bhi deg4 abs41 the ,earth would be radiating its heat nearly #cj times faster than ,mars4 ,the heat income of ,mars would therefore be in a much higher proportion than its expenditure2 and necessarily its heat capital would increase until income and expenditure balanced4 ,prof4 ,poynting has made the temperature of the planets under the #dth power law of radiation the subject of an interesting enquiry1 and the figures which he has obtained for ,mars and other planets are included in the ,table4 ,the equatorial and average temperatures are given under the assumption that ,mars possesses an atmosphere as efficient as our own in equalizing the temperature of the whole planet4 ,if1 on the other hand1 its atmosphere has no such regulating power1 then under the zenith ,sun the upper limit of the temperature of a portion of its surface reflecting one-eighth would be1 as shown in the ,table1 #fd deg4,c4 ,this would imply that the temperature on the dark side of the planet was very nearly at the absolute zero4 ,if we regard ,mars as resembling our ,moon1 and take the ,moon's effective average temperature as #big deg4 abs41 the corresponding temperature for ,mars is #bdj deg4 abs41 and the highest temperature is four-fifths of #ccg deg4 #bgj deg4 abs4 ,but the surface of ,mars has probably a higher coefficient of absorption than the surface of the ,moon--it certainly has for light--so that we may put his effective average temperature1 on this supposition1 some few degrees above #bdj deg4 abs41 and his equatorial temperature some degrees higher still4 ,it appears as exceedingly probable1 then1 that whether we regard ,mars as like the ,earth or1 going to the other extreme1 as like the ,moon1 the temperature of his surface is everywhere below the freezing-point of water4#ad ,as the atmospheric circulation on ,mars must be languid1 and the atmosphere itself is very rare1 the general condition of the planet will approximate rather to the lunar type than to the terrestrial1 and the extremes1 both of heat and cold1 will approach those which would prevail on a planet without a regulating atmosphere4 ,there is another way of considering the effect on the climate of ,mars and its great distance from the ,sun1 which1 though only rough and crude1 may be helpful to some readers4 ,if we take the ,earth at noonday at the time of the equinox1 then a square yard at the equator has the ,sun in its zenith1 and is fully presented to its light and heat4 ,but1 as we move away from the equator1 we find that each higher latitude is less fully presented to the ,sun1 until1 when we reach latitude #fd-a_/b deg4--in other words just outside the ,arctic ,circle--#g square yards are presented to the ,sun so as to receive only as much of the solar radiation as #c square yards receive at the equator4 ,we may take1 then1 latitude #fd-a_/b deg4 as representing ,mars1 while the equator represents the ,earth4 ,or1 we may take it that we should compare the climate of ,archangel with the climate of ,singapore4 ,now the mean temperature of latitude #fd-a_/b deg41 say the latitude of ,archangel1 is just about freezing-point 7#j deg4,c471 while that of the equator is about #bh deg4,c4 ,we should therefore expect from this a difference between the mean temperatures of the ,earth and ,mars of #bh deg42 that is to say1 as the ,earth stands at #af deg4,c1 ,mars would be at -#ab deg4,c4 ,but1 on the ,earth1 the evaporation and precipitation is great1 and the atmospheric circulation vigorous4 ,evaporation is always going on in equatorial regions1 and the moisture-laden winds are continually moving polewards1 carrying with them vast stores of heat to be liberated as the rain falls4 ,the oceanic currents have the same effect1 and how great the modification which they introduce may be seen by comparing the climates of ,labrador and ,scotland4 ,there appear to be no great oceans on ,mars4 ,the difference of #bh deg4 which we find on the ,earth between the equator and the edge of the ,arctic ,circle is a difference which remains after the convection currents of air and sea have done much to reduce the temperature of the equator and to raise that of high latitudes4 ,if we suppose that their effect has been to reduce this difference to one half of what it would have been were each latitude isolated from the rest1 we shall not be far wrong1 and we should get a range of #ef deg4 as the true equivalent difference between the mean temperatures of ,singapore and ,archangel2 i4e4 of the ,earth and ,mars2 and ,mars would stand at -#dj deg4,c4 ,the closeness with which this figure agrees with that reached by ,prof4 ,poynting suggests that it is a fair approximation to the correct figure4 ,the size of ,mars taught us that we have in it a planet with an atmosphere of but one half the density of that prevailing on the top of our highest mountain2 the distance of ,mars from the ,sun showed us that it must have a mean temperature close to that of freezing mercury4 ,what chance would there be for life on a world the average condition of which would correspond to that of a terrestrial mountain top1 ten miles high and in the heart of the polar regions8 ,but ,mars in the telescope does not look like a cold planet4 ,as we look at it1 and note its bright colour1 the small extent of the white caps presumed to be snow1 and the high latitudes in which the dark markings--presumed to be water or vegetation--are seen1 it seems difficult to suppose that the mean temperature of the planet is lower than that of the ,earth4 ,thus on the wonderful photographs taken by ,prof4 ,barnard in #aiji1 the ,nilosyrtis with the ,protonilus is seen as a dark canal4 ,now the ,protonilus is in ,north ,lat4 #db deg41 and on the date of observation--,september #bh1 #aiji--the winter solstice of the northern hemisphere of ,mars was just past4 ,there would be nothing unusual for the ground to be covered with snow and the water to be frozen in a corresponding latitude if in a continental situation on the ,earth4 ,then1 again1 in the summer1 the white polar caps of ,mars diminish to a far greater extent than the snow and ice caps of the ,earth2 indeed1 one of the ,martian caps has been known to disappear completely4 ,yet1 as the accompanying diagram will show1 something of this kind is precisely what we ought to expect to see4 ,the diagram has been constructed in the following manner3 ,a curve of mean temperatures has been laid down for every #aj deg4 of latitude on the ,earth1 derived as far as possible from accepted isothermals in continental countries in the northern hemisphere4 ,from this curve ordinates have been drawn at each #aj deg41 upward to show average deviation from the mean temperature for the hottest part of the day in summer1 downward for the deviation for the coldest part of the night in winter4 ,obviously1 on the average1 the range from maximum to minimum will increase from the equator to the poles4 ,the mean temperature of the ,earth has been taken as #af deg4,c1 and as representing that prevailing in about #db deg4 lat4 ,the diagram shows that the maximum temperature of no place upon the ,earth's surface approaches the boiling-point of water1 and that it is only within the polar circle that the mean temperature is below freezing-point4 ,water1 therefore1 on the ,earth must be normally in the liquid state4 ,in constructing a similar diagram for ,mars1 three modifications have to be made4 ,first of all1 the mean temperature of the planet must be considerably lower than that of the ,earth4 ,next1 since the atmospheric circulation is languid and there are no great oceans1 the temperatures of different latitudes cannot be equalized to the same extent as on the ,earth4 ,it follows1 therefore1 that the range in mean temperature from equator to pole must be considerably greater on ,mars than on the ,earth4 ,thirdly1 the range in temperature in any latitude1 from the hottest part of the day in summer to the coldest part of the night in winter1 must be much greater than with us2 partly on account of the very slight density of the atmosphere1 and partly on account of the length of the ,martian year4 ,illustration3 ,,thermographs ,,of ,,the ,,earth ,,and ,,mars ,we cannot know the exact figures to adopt1 but the general type of the thermograph for ,mars as compared with that of the ,earth will remain4 ,the mean temperature of ,mars will be lower1 the range of temperature from equator to pole will be greater1 and the extremes of temperature in any given latitude more pronounced than upon the ,earth4 ,and the general lesson of the diagram may be summed up in a sentence4 ,the maximum temperature on the planet is well above freezing-point1 and the part of the planet at maximum temperature is precisely the part that we see the best4 ,but while this is so1 it is clear that water on ,mars must normally be in the state of ice2 ,mars is essentially a frozen planet2 and the extremes of cold experienced there1 not only every year but every night1 far transcend the bitterest extremes of our own polar regions4 ,the above considerations do not appear to render it likely that there is any vegetation on ,mars4 ,a planet ice-bound every night and with its mean temperature considerably below freezing-point does not seem promising for vegetation4 ,if vegetation exists1 it must be of a kind that can pass through all the stages of its life-history during the few bright hours of the ,martian day4 ,every night will be for it a winter1 a winter of undescribable frost1 which it could only endure in the form of spores4 ,so if there be vegetation it must be confined to some hardy forms of a low type4 ,at a distance of forty millions of miles it is not easy to discriminate between the darkness of sheets of water and the darkness of stretches of vegetation4 ,some of the so-called seas may possibly be really of the latter class1 but that there must be expanses of water on the planet is clear1 for if there were no water surfaces there would be no evaporation2 and if there were no evaporation from whence could come the supply of moisture that builds up the winter pole cap8 ,the great ,american astronomer1 ,prof4 ,newcomb1 gave in ,harper's ,weekly for ,july #be1 #aijh1 an admirable summary of the verdict of science as to the character of the meteorology of ,mars4 ,the most careful calculation shows that if there are any considerable bodies of water on our neighbouring planet they exist in the form of ice1 and can never be liquid to a depth of more than one or two inches1 and that only within the torrid zone and during a few hours each day4444 ,there is no evidence that snow like ours ever forms around the poles of ,mars4 ,it does not seem possible that any considerable fall of such snow could ever take place1 nor is there any necessity of supposing actual snow or ice to account for the white caps4 ,at a temperature vastly below any ever felt in ,siberia1 the smallest particles of moisture will be condensed into what we call hoar frost1 and will glisten with as much whiteness as actual snow4444 ,thus we have a kind of ,martian meteorological changes1 very slight indeed and seemingly very different from those of our earth1 but yet following similar lines on their small scale4 ,for snowfall substitute frostfall2 instead of feet or inches say fractions of a millimetre1 and instead of storms or wind substitute little motions of an air thinner than that on the top of the ,himalayas1 and we shall have a general description of ,martian meteorology4 ,what we know of ,mars1 then1 shows us a planet1 icebound every night1 but with a day temperature somewhat above freezing-point4 ,as we see it1 we look upon its warmest regions1 and the rapidity with which it is cleared of ice1 snow1 and cloud shows the atmosphere to be rare and the moisture little in amount and readily evaporated4 ,the seas are probably shallow depressions1 filled with ice to the bottom1 but melted as to their surfaces by day4 ,from the variety of tints noted in the seas1 and the recurrent changes in their outlines1 they are composed of congeries of shallow pools1 fed by small sluggish streams2 great ocean basins into which great rivers discharge themselves are quite unknown4 ,,chapter ,,viii ,,the ,,illusions ,,of ,,mars ,the two preceding chapters have led to two opposing1 two incompatible conclusions4 ,in ,chapter ,,vi1 a summary was given of ,prof4 ,lowell's claim to have had ocular demonstration of the handiwork of intelligent organisms on ,mars4 ,in ,chapter ,,vii1 it was shown that the indispensable condition for living organisms1 water in the liquid state1 is only occasionally present there1 the general temperature being much below freezing-point1 so that living organisms of high development and more than ephemeral existence are impossible4 ,prof4 ,lowell argues that the appearance of the network of lines and spots formed by the canals and oases1 and its regular behaviour1 preclude its causation on such a scale by any natural process1 his assumption being that he has obtained finality in his seeing of the planet1 and that no improvement in telescopes1 no increase in experience1 no better eyesight will ever break up the perfect regularity of form and position1 which he gives to the canals1 into finer and more complex detail4 ,but the history of our knowledge of the planet's surface teaches us a different lesson4 ,two small objects appear repeatedly on the drawings made by ,beer and ,maedler in #ahcj2 these are two similar dark spots1 the one isolated1 the other at the end of a gently curved line4 ,both spots resemble in form and character the oases of ,prof4 ,lowell1 and the curved line1 at the termination of which one of the spots appears1 represents closely the appearance presented by several of the canals4 ,in the year #ahcj no better drawings of ,mars had appeared2 and in representing these two spots as truly circular and the curved line as narrow1 sharp1 and uniform1 ,beer and ,maedler undoubtedly portrayed the planet as actually they saw it4 ,the one marking was named by ,schiaparelli the ,lacus ,solis1 the other1 the ,sinus ,sabaeus1 and they are two of the best known and most easily recognized of the planet's features2 so that it is easy to trace the growth of our knowledge of both of them from #ahcj up to the present time4 ,they were drawn by ,dawes in #ahfd1 by ,schiaparelli in #ahgg and the succeeding years1 by ,lowell in #ahid and since1 and by ,antoniadi in #aiji and #aiaa4 ,but whereas the drawings of ,beer and ,maedler1 made by the aid of a telescope of #d inches aperture1 show the two spots as exactly alike1 in those of ,dawes1 made with a telescope of #h inches1 the resemblance between the two has entirely vanished1 and neither is shown as a plain circular dot4 ,since then1 observers of greater experience and equipped with more powerful instruments have directed their attention to these two objects1 and a mass of complicated structure has been brought out in the regions which were so simple in the sight of ,beer and ,maedler1 so that not a trace of resemblance remains between the two objects that to them appeared indistinguishable4 ,now the gradation in size1 from the ,lacus ,solis down to the smallest oasis of ,lowell1 is a complete one4 ,if a future development in the power of telescopes should equal the advance made from the #d-;inch of ,beer and ,maedler1 to the #cc-;inch which ,antoniadi used in #aiji1 is it reasonable to suppose that ,prof4 ,lowell's oases will refuse to yield to such improvement1 and will all still show themselves as uniform spots1 precisely circular in outline8 ,it is clear that ,beer and ,maedler would have been mistaken if they had argued that the apparently perfect circularity of the two oases which they observed proved them to be artificial1 because the increase in telescopic power has since shown us that neither is circular4 ,the obvious reason why they appeared so round to ,beer and ,maedler was that they were too small to be defined in their instruments2 their minor irregularities were therefore invisible1 and their apparent circularity covered detail of an altogether different form4 ,beer and ,maedler only drew two such spots2 ,lowell shows about two hundred4 ,beer and ,maedler's two spots seemed to them exactly alike2 these two spots as we see them to-day have no resemblance to each other4 ,prof4 ,lowell's two hundred oases1 with few exceptions1 seem all of the same character2 is it possible to suppose1 if telescopes develop in the future as they have done in the past1 that the two hundred oases will preserve their uniformity of appearance any more than the ,lacus ,solis and the head of the ,sinus ,sabaeus8 ,if a novice begins to work upon ,mars with a small telescope1 he will draw the ,lacus ,solis and the ,sinus ,sabaeus as two round1 uniform spots1 and as he gains experience1 and his instrumental power is increased1 he will begin to detect detail in them1 and draw them as ,dawes and ,schiaparelli and others have shown them later4 ,it is no question of planetary change2 it is a question of experience and of seeing4 ,there is a much simpler explanation of the regularity of the canals and oases than to suppose that an industrious population of geometers have dug them out or planted them2 it is connected with the nature of vision4 ,a telegraph wire seen against a background of a bright cloud can be discerned at an amazing distance--in fact1 at #bjj1jjj times the breadth of the wire2 a distance at which the wire subtends a breadth of a second of arc4 ,for average normal sight the perception of the wire will be quite unmistakable1 but at the same time it would be quite untrue to say that the perception of the wire was of the nature of defined vision1 as would be seen at once if small objects of irregular shape were threaded on the wire2 these would have to be many times the breadth of the wire in order to be detected4 ,again1 if instead of a wire of very great length extending right across the field of view of both eyes1 a short1 black line be drawn on a white ground1 it will be found that as the length of the line is diminished below a certain point so its breadth must be increased4 ,if the observer is distant from the line #fjjj times its length1 then the breadth must be increased to be equal to the length1 and the object1 whatever its actual shape1 can be just recognized as a small circular spot1 which will subtend about #cd seconds of arc4 ,but though a black spot1 #cd seconds in diameter1 can be perceived on a white ground1 we have not yet attained to defined vision4 ,for if we place two black spots each #cd seconds of arc in diameter1 near each other1 they will not be seen as separate spots unless there is a clear space between them of six times that amount4 ,nearer than that they will give the impression that they form one circular spot1 or an oval one1 or even a uniform straight line1 according to the amount of separation4 ,if two equal round spots be placed so that the distance between their centres is equal to two diameters1 then the diameter of each spot must be1 at least1 #gj seconds of arc for them to be distinctly defined2 that is to say for the spots to be seen as two separate objects4 ,it will be seen that there is a wide range between objects that are large enough to be quite unmistakably perceived1 and objects which are large enough to have their true outline really defined4 ,it is a question of seconds of arc in the one case and of minutes of arc in the other4 ,within this range1 between the limit at which objects can be just perceived and that where they can be just defined1 objects must all appear as of one of two forms--the straight line and the circular dot4 ,this depends upon the structure of the eye and of the retina2 the eye being essentially a lens with its defining power necessarily limited by its aperture1 and the retina a sensitive screen built up of an immense number of separate elements each of which can only transmit a single sensation4 ,different eyes will have different limits1 both for the smallest objects which can be discerned and for the smallest objects that can be defined1 but for any sight the range between the two will be of the order just indicated4 ,prof4 ,lowell has drawn attention to the strangely economic character of both the canals and oases in the matter of form4 ,it is true that straight lines and circles are economic forms1 but they are economic not only in the construction of irrigation works but also in vision4 ,the circle is the figure which encloses the maximum area for the minimum average distance from its centre to any point situated within it2 therefore1 if a small spot be perceived by the sight but be too small to have its actual outline defined1 it will be recognized by the eye as being truly circular1 on the principle of economy of effort4 ,so1 again1 a straight line is the shortest that can be drawn between two points2 and a straight line can be perceived as such when of an angular breadth quite #dj times less than that of the smallest spot4 ,a straight line is that which gives the least total excitement in order to produce an appreciable impression1 and therefore the smallest appreciable impression produces the effect of a straight line4 ,it is sufficient1 then1 for us to suppose that the surface of ,mars is dotted over with minute irregular markings1 with a tendency to aggregate in certain directions1 such as would naturally arise in the process of the cooling of a planet when the outer crust was contracting above an unyielding nucleus4 ,if these markings are fairly near each other it is not necessary1 in order to produce the effect of canals1 that they should be individually large enough to be seen4 ,they may be of any conceivable shape1 provided that they are separately below the limit of defined vision1 and are sufficiently sparsely scattered4 ,in this case the eye inevitably sums up the details 7which it recognizes but cannot resolve7 into lines essentially canal-like in character4 ,wherever there is a small aggregation of these minute markings1 an impression will be given of a circular spot1 or1 to use ,prof4 ,lowell's nomenclature1 an oasis4 ,if the aggregation be greater still and more extended1 we shall have a shaded area--a sea4 ,the above remarks apply to observation with the unaided eye1 but the same principle applies yet more strongly to telescopic vision4 ,no star is near enough or sufficiently large to give the least impression of a true disc2 its diameter is indistinguishable2 it is for us a mathematical point1 without parts or magnitude4 ,but the image of a star formed by a telescope is not a point but a minute disc1 surrounded by a series of diffraction rings4 ,this disc is spurious1 for the greater the aperture of the telescope the smaller the apparent disc4 ,that which holds good for a bright point like a star holds good for every individual point of a planetary surface when viewed through the telescope2 that is to say1 each point is represented by a minute disc2 all lines and outlines therefore are slightly blurred1 so that minute irregularities are inevitably smoothed out4 ,when we come to photographs1 the process is carried to a third stage4 ,the image is formed by the telescope1 subject to all the limitations of telescopic images1 and is received on a plate essentially granular in structure1 and is finally examined by the eye4 ,the granular structure of the plate acts as the third factor in concealing irregularities and simplifying details2 a third factor in producing the two simplest types of form--the straight line and the circular dot4 ,prof4 ,lowell describes the canals as like lines drawn with pen1 ink and ruler1 but not a few of our best observers have advanced much beyond this stage4 ,even as far back as #ahhd1 some of the canals were losing their strict rectilinear appearance to ,schiaparelli1 and the observers of the planet who have been best favoured by the power of the telescope at their disposal1 by the atmospheric conditions under which they worked1 and by their own skill and experience--such as ,antoniadi1 ,barnard1 ,cerulli1 ,denning1 ,millochau1 ,molesworth1 ,phillips1 ,stanley ,williams and others--have found them to show evident signs of resolution4 ,thus1 in #aiji1 ,antoniadi found that of #ej canals1 #ad were resolved into disconnected knots of diffused shadings1 #d were seen as irregular lines1 #aj as more or less dark bands2 and he found that1 in good seeing1 there was no trace whatever of the geometrical network4 ,the progress of observation1 therefore1 has left ,prof4 ,lowell behind1 and has dispelled the fable which he has defended with so much ingenuity4 ,but1 indeed1 there never was any more reason for taking seriously his theory as to the presence of artificial waterways on ,mars than for believing in the actual existence of the weird creatures described by ,h4 ,g4 ,wells in the ,war of the ,worlds4 ,there are too many oversights in the canal theory4 ,thus no source is indicated for the moisture supposed to be locked up in the winter pole cap4 ,prof4 ,lowell holds that there are no large bodies of water on the planet2 that the so-called seas are really cultivated land4 ,in this case there could be little or no evaporation1 and so no means by which the polar deposits could be recruited4 ,yet it is certain that the supply of the winter pole cap must come from the evaporation of water in some region or other4 ,and here is another oversight of the artificial canal theory4 ,the canals are supposed to be necessary for the conveyance of water from the pole towards the equator2 although1 as this was uphill1 vast pumping stations at short intervals had to be predicated4 ,but it is not supposed that the water needed to travel by way of the canals to the poles4 ,if1 however1 the moisture is conveyed as vapour through the atmosphere to the pole as winter approaches1 it cannot be impossible that it should be conveyed in the same manner from the pole as summer draws on1 and in that case the artificial canals would not be needed4 ,if the canals are necessary for conveying the water in one direction1 they would be necessary for the opposite direction4 ,but there would be something too farcical in the idea of the careful ,martians dispatching their water first to the pole to be frozen there1 and then1 after it had been duly frozen and melted again1 fetching it back along thousands of miles and through numerous pumping stations for use in irrigating their fields4 ,of all the many hundreds of canals only a few actually touch the polar caps4 ,but on the theory that the entire canal system is fed by the polar cap in summer1 the carrying capacity of the polar canals should be equal to1 if not greater than1 that of the entire system outside the polar circle4 ,a glance at the charts of the planet shows that the polar canals could not supply a twentieth part of the water needed for those in the equatorial regions4 ,another oversight is that of the significance of the alleged uniformity and breadth of the canals4 ,prof4 ,lowell repeatedly insists that the canals are of even breadth from end to end1 and spring into existence at once throughout their whole length4 ,this statement is in itself a proof that the canals cannot be what he supposes them to be4 ,an irrigation system could not have these characteristics2 the region fertilized would take time to develop2 we should see the canal extending itself gradually across the continent1 and its breadth would not be uniform from end to end1 but the region fertilized would grow narrower with increase of distance from the fountain head of the canal4 ,under what conditions can we see straight lines1 perfectly uniform from end to end1 spring into existence1 in their entirety1 without going through any stages of growth8 ,when the lines are not actual images1 but are suggested by markings perceived1 but not perfectly defined4 ,in #aijb and #aijc1 in conjunction with ,mr4 ,evans1 the headmaster of ,greenwich ,hospital ,school1 ,i tried a number of experiments on this point1 with the aid of about two hundred of the boys of the school4 ,they had several qualifications in respect of these experiments2 they were keen-sighted1 well drilled2 accustomed to do what they were told without asking questions2 and they knew nothing whatsoever of astronomy1 certainly nothing about ,mars4 ,a diagram was hung up1 based upon some drawing or other of the planet made by ,schiaparelli1 ,lowell or other ,martian observer1 but the canals were not inserted2 only a few dots or irregular markings were put in here and there4 ,and the boys were arranged at different distances from the diagram and told to draw exactly what they saw4 ,those nearest the diagram were able to detect the little irregular markings and represented them under their true forms4 ,those at the back of the room could not see anything of them1 and only represented the broadest features of the diagram1 the continents and seas4 ,those in the middle of the room were too far off to define the minute markings1 but were near enough for those markings to produce some impression upon them2 and that impression always was of a network of straight lines1 sometimes with dots at the points of meeting4 ,advancing from a distance toward the diagram the process of development became quite clear4 ,at the back of the room no straight lines were seen2 as the observer came slowly forward1 first one straight line would appear completely1 then another1 and so on1 until all the chief canals drawn by ,schiaparelli and ,lowell in the region represented had come into evidence in their proper places4 ,advancing still further1 the canals disappeared1 and the little irregular markings which had given rise to them were perceived in their true forms4 ,these experiments at the ,greenwich ,hospital ,school were merely the repetition of similar ones that ,i had myself made privately twelve years earlier1 leading me to the conclusion1 published in #ahid1 that the canals of ,mars were simply the summation of a complexity of detail too minute to be separately discerned4 ,a little later1 in his work ,marte nel #ahif-g1 ,dr4 ,cerulli independently arrived at the same conclusion1 and wrote3 ,these lines are formed by the eye 444 which utilizes 444 the dark elements which it finds along certain directions2 and a large number of these elements forms a broad band2 and a smaller number of them gives rise to a narrow line4 ,also1 the marvellous appearance of the lines in question has its origin1 not in the reality of the thing1 but in the inability of the present telescope to show faithfully such a reality4 ,in #aijg1 ,prof4 ,newcomb made some experiments in the same direction and reached the same general conclusion4 ,more recently still1 ,prof4 ,w4 ,h4 ,pickering has worked on the same lines and with the same result4 ,the venerable ,george ,pollock1 formerly the ,senior ,master of the ,supreme ,court and ,king's ,remembrancer1 sent to me1 in his #iast year1 the following note as affording an apt illustration of the true nature of the canaliform markings on ,mars3 ,on ,saturday last1 journeying in a motor-car1 ,i came into a broad road bounded by a dark wood4 ,looking up ,i was amazed to see distinct1 well-defined1 vertical1 parallel white lines1 the wood forming the dark background4 ,on getting nearer1 these lines resolved themselves into spots1 and they proved to be the white insulators supporting the telegraph wires4 ,prof4 ,lowell has objected that all experiments and illustrations of this kind are irrelevant2 only observations upon the planet itself ought to be taken into account4 ,but such observations have been made upon the planet itself with just the same result4 ,observers have seen streaks upon ,mars--knotted1 broken1 irregular1 full of detail--and when the planet has receded to a greater distance1 the very same marking has shown itself as a narrow straight line1 uniform from end to end1 as if drawn with pen1 ink and ruler4 ,the greater distance has caused the irregularities1 seen when nearer at hand1 to disappear4 ,in this1 and not in any gigantic engineering works1 is the explanation of the artificiality of the markings on ,mars as ,prof4 ,lowell sees them4 ,that artificiality has already disappeared under better seeing with more powerful telescopes4 ,this chapter is entitled ,the ,illusions of ,mars4 ,yet the illusions of ,mars are not the straight lines and round dots of the canal system1 but the forced and curious interpretation which has been put upon them4 ,if the planet be within a certain range of distance and under examination with a certain telescopic power1 the straight lines and round dots are inevitable4 ,their artificiality is not a function of the actual ,martian details themselves1 but of the mode in which1 under given conditions1 we are obliged to see them4 ,,chapter ,,ix ,,venus1 ,,mercury ,,and ,,the ,,asteroids ,of all the planets1 ,venus appears1 to the unassisted eye1 by far the loveliest4 ,when seen in the early morning before sunrise--its western elongation--or after sundown in the evening--its eastern elongation--and still more as it attains its greatest brilliancy1 it has attracted attention everywhere and in all ages4 ,it then shines with brilliance ten times as great as ,jupiter in opposition1 and the brightest members of the heavenly host look pale and dim beside it4 ,it is emphatically the morning or the evening star1 ,lucifer1 or ,vesper1 herald or follower of the ,sun2 it can even assert itself in the presence of the ,lord of ,day1 for it has often been seen at noonday by watchers who knew where to look2 sometimes by the general crowd4 ,but in the telescope ,venus appears less satisfying4 ,it is a pretty spectacle indeed to watch the phases of the gleaming little globe of silver1 for1 like the ,moon under varying illumination from the ,sun1 it undergoes change of apparent shape4 ,but the surface of the planet yields little detail1 and that little is illusive and ill-defined4 ,the clear-cut outlines and black shadows of the ,moon have no place here1 nor do the ruddy plains and blue-grey seas of ,mars find any analogues4 ,all that can be observed beyond the changes of phase are a few faint1 ill-defined patches1 where the molten silver of the general surface is slightly dimmed and tarnished1 and perhaps one or two spots1 not less evasive and difficult to fix1 that exceed the rest of the surface in brightness4 ,this very difficulty in making out the markings on ,venus is hopeful for our search2 it points to a veiling over the planet1 a veiling by an atmosphere4 ,and the statistics of the ,table show that ,venus closely resembles our ,earth in size and mass1 and therefore probably in atmospheric equipment4 ,if we assume that the atmosphere of any planet is in direct proportion to its mass--and as ,venus is so nearly the twin of the ,earth there is no reason to expect any great difference between the two in this respect--the atmosphere of ,venus would have a pressure of about #aa4b lb4 on the square inch1 and the level of half pressure would be nearly four miles above the surface4 ,in other words the atmosphere would be both thinner and deeper than that of the ,earth1 but the difference would not be important in amount4 ,but ,venus is nearer to the ,sun than the ,earth1 and receives nearly double the light and heat4 ,its theoretical equatorial temperature is #cfh deg4abs41 or #ie deg4,c1 and its corresponding mean temperature is #fi deg4 ,c4 ,but water under a pressure of #aa4b lb4 will boil at #ic deg4 ,c1 so that at the equator of ,venus the upper limit for water as a liquid is just passed1 but1 for the planet in general1 a fairly safe margin is maintained4 ,here then is sufficient explanation why the topography of ,venus is concealed4 ,the atmosphere will always be abundantly charged with water-vapour1 and an almost unbroken screen of clouds be spread throughout its upper regions4 ,such a screen will greatly protect the planet from the full scorching of the ,sun1 and tend to equalize the temperature of day and night1 of summer and winter1 of equator and poles4 ,the temperature range will be slight1 and there will be no wide expanses of polar ice4 ,water that flows will be abundant everywhere4 ,so far all the facts connected with ,venus are favourable for life1 even though the picture called up to the mind may not seem inviting to us4 ,for views of the heavens must be rare2 the ,sun must seldom pierce through the cloud veil2 there is no moon and the stars must be almost always hidden4 ,the ,earth with its ,moon might form a beautiful ornament at times in the midnight sky if the cloud-shell should occasionally open1 but on the whole1 the planet is shut up to itself in a perpetual vapour-bath1 and its condition will approach that of some of the most humid countries in the terrestrial tropics during the height of their rainy seasons4 ,but it would seem that life both of plants and animals1 under such conditions1 might flourish and be abundant4 ,the mean temperature would not1 in general1 be high enough to drive off the water as steam1 nor low enough to congeal it into ice2 it would remain water--water that flows4 ,but there is still a possible hindrance to life on ,venus1 a hindrance that actually exists in the case of ,mercury4 ,mercury1 the ,twinkler1 is not an easy object in our ,northern latitudes1 but1 in countries near the tropics1 is often quite conspicuous1 a little scintillating gem of light in the bright sky1 before sunrise or after sunset4 ,in the telescope it is not so attractive as ,venus1 partly because it is smaller1 partly because1 though it receives more than three times as much light from the ,sun1 it is duller in hue4 ,yet it is not quite so secretive as its neighbour1 and a certain number of markings have been detected upon its disc1 markings which1 like those of the ,moon1 appear to be permanent4 ,a glance at the ,table will show that this was to be expected4 ,in size1 ,mercury comes between the ,moon and ,mars1 and the atmospheric veil ought therefore to be1 as it evidently is1 very slight and transparent2 offering little or no hindrance to an observer scanning it from another world4 ,the other necessary consequences of small size and mass will follow2 the feeble force of gravitation1 the languid atmospheric circulation1 the extreme range of temperatures1 the low temperature at which water will boil4 ,but the heat to which ,mercury is exposed far transcends our terrestrial experience4 ,in the mean it receives nearly seven times as much heat from the ,sun as the ,earth does1 but this supply is not maintained uniformly1 for ,mercury moves round the ,sun in a very eccentric orbit1 so that when in aphelion it receives1 surface for surface1 only about four times as much heat as the ,earth1 but some six weeks later when in perihelion it receives more than eleven times4 ,the great range of temperature due to the thinness of the atmosphere must therefore be further increased by the varying distance of the planet from the ,sun4 ,a reference to ,prof4 ,poynting's figures shows that the mean temperature of ,mercury must approximate to #aid deg4 ,c41 while water will boil at #dj deg4 ,c4 or even lower4 ,here1 then1 is a condition the exact reverse of ,mars4 ,water as a liquid will be rare on ,mercury1 not because it is congealed1 but because it is evaporated2 on the dark side of the planet it may1 indeed1 pass into ice1 but on the side exposed to the ,sun it must exist normally as a constituent of the atmosphere4 ,water in a liquid state1 water that flows1 must be almost unknown4 ,but we have good reason to believe that that which is the dark side of ,mercury at one time is always dark2 that which is exposed to the ,sun is always exposed to it4 ,since ,mercury wears no concealing veil of atmosphere1 and displays markings that can be identified and followed1 a surprising circumstance has come to light4 ,in #ahhi1 ,schiaparelli discovered that ,mercury1 instead of rotating on its axis in about #bd hours like the ,earth and ,mars1 rotates in #hh days2 that is to say1 it always turns the same face towards the ,sun1 just as the ,moon turns the same face towards the ,earth4 ,this fact1 confirmed theoretically by ,prof4 ,g4 ,h4 ,darwin in his development of the theory of tidal friction1 puts the condition of ,mercury in quite a new light4 ,no alternation of day or night refreshes and restores the little world2 one hemisphere is for ever exposed to the blasting heat of the ,sun1 seven times hotter for it than for the ,earth2 the other hemisphere is for ever exposed to the darkness and cold of outer space1 a range from something like #cij deg4 ,c4 above freezing-point1 to #bgj deg4 ,c4 below4 ,it is true that between the two hemispheres there is a debatable land1 for1 owing to the ellipticity of the orbit1 the face turned to the ,sun is not exactly the same at all times1 and a region about #dg deg4 in width on each side of the planet1 that is to say1 rather more than a quarter of its entire surface1 has one day and one night in each period of #hh days1 but these more favoured sections can scarcely be considered more habitable than the rest4 ,the conditions of ,mercury are so unfavourable for life that1 even if this remarkable relation of rotation period to revolution did not hold good1 it would still be impossible to regard it as a world for habitation4 ,but its case shows that a further condition of habitability has to be satisfied by a planet4 ,size and distance from the ,sun afford the first two conditions2 a suitable rotation period is now seen to be a third4 ,and it is possible that in this very particular ,venus fails to qualify4 ,schiaparelli1 the first observer of his time1 assisted by the clear ,italian sky1 believed that he had demonstrated that ,venus1 like ,mercury1 rotates once in her year2 her day being thus equal in length to #bbe of ours1 and the face that she turns to the ,sun being always the same4 ,and in her case this statement requires practically no qualification1 for1 her orbit being nearly circular1 there is hardly any libration2 a place that has the ,sun in its zenith has it so for ever2 one on the night side of ,venus can never have a sunrise1 or gladden in the daylight4 ,the side exposed to the ,sun will wither in a temperature of about #bbg deg4 ,c41 in which all moisture will be evaporated2 the side remote from it will be bound in eternal ice4 ,in neither hemisphere will water exist in the liquid state2 in neither hemisphere will life be possible4 ,but as yet the evidence is not conclusive that ,venus has this long rotation period4 ,several observers of high rank believe that our neighbour rotates in nearly the same time as the ,earth1 but its markings are so faint and elusive that the problem is a difficult one4 ,the spectroscopic method of determining the speed of rotation has been equally indecisive4 ,until1 therefore1 the rotation period has been decided1 the habitability of ,venus must remain in question4 ,if it always turns the same face to the ,sun1 there can be no more life upon it than upon ,mercury2 if on the contrary it rotates in much the same time as the ,earth1 then1 so far as we know1 it may well be a habitable world4 ,whether it is actually inhabited is a matter at present entirely beyond our knowledge4 ,a page or two back we touched lightly on the eccentricity of the orbit of ,mercury--lightly1 because it was not the chief factor in disabling the planet for habitation4 ,but the condition introduced by this eccentricity is one which of itself would be sufficient to put it out of court4 ,in the six weeks in which ,mercury moves from aphelion to perihelion1 it approaches the ,sun by fourteen millions of miles1 and the heat received by it is increased #b-a_/b times4 ,then1 in the next six weeks1 it recedes as far1 and there is a like diminution4 ,in other words1 six weeks makes a greater proportional change in this one planet's condition than we should experience if our ,earth were transported from its own orbit to that of ,mars4 ,but there are other members of the solar system whose orbits are so elongated that that of ,mercury seems in comparison almost circular4 ,these are the comets1 some of which all but graze the surface of the ,sun at perihelion1 and then recede from him for periods that it takes even thousands of years to complete4 ,but without dwelling on such extreme cases1 two of the best known of the periodic comets may be taken as examples of the rest4 ,encke's is the comet of shortest period1 returning in about #c4c years4 ,at perihelion it is #ca millions of miles from the ,sun2 one-third the distance of the ,earth4 ,it receives1 therefore1 at this part of its orbit1 #i times as much light and heat as the ,earth4 ,but at aphelion it retreats deep into the region of the asteroids1 and is much more than four times the mean distance of the ,earth4 ,at this part of its orbit it receives but #a_/agth as much heat as the ,earth4 ,by far the most famous of all the comets is that known by the name of ,halley1 and its mean period is #gf years4 ,at perihelion it comes within the orbit of ,venus2 indeed1 nearly halfway between that and the orbit of ,mercury4 ,at aphelion it recedes to thirty-five times the distance of the ,earth1 far beyond the orbit of ,neptune4 ,the range in its light and heat from the ,sun is from #c times that of the ,earth to less than #a_/abjjth2 or1 in other words1 the supply of heat at one time is nearly #djjj times that at another1 and of the #gf years of its period1 only #hj days are spent within the orbit of the ,earth4 ,comets cannot be homes of life2 they are not sufficiently condensed2 indeed1 they are probably but loose congeries of small stones4 ,but even if comets were of planetary size it is clear that life could not be supported on them2 water could not remain in the liquid state on a world that rushed from one such extreme of temperature to another4 ,between the orbits of ,mars and ,jupiter there are scattered an untold number of little planets commonly known as asteroids or minor planets4 ,minor planets indeed they are1 for the one first discovered--,ceres-- probably outweighs all the rest1 known and unknown1 put together1 though something like #gjj have already been detected1 and the list grows at the rate of about one a week4 ,as the ,table shows1 ,ceres is so small that the ,earth exceeds it in volume #ejjj times2 even the ,moon is #ij times as large4 ,the mass of ,ceres is not known2 being so small1 its density is probably less than that of the ,moon1 so that the ,earth may easily outweigh it #aj1jjj times4 ,the unfavourable conditions resulting from smallness of size that the ,moon presents are therefore exaggerated exceedingly in the case of ,ceres2 its atmosphere must approach in tenuity what we should regard as a vacuum in a terrestrial laboratory1 and water as a liquid be entirely unknown4 ,its distance from the ,sun is another hostile factor2 for in consequence it receives per unit of surface only #ac per cent of the light and heat that falls on the ,earth2 its maximum temperature under a zenith ,sun will fall far below freezing-point1 the minimum on the dark side will approach the absolute zero4 ,with ,ceres the whole of the asteroidal family can be dismissed as possible abodes of life4 ,no astronomer can regard them as such4 ,yet they have their lesson to teach4 ,life can exist on the ,earth only on the upper face of its crust1 and in a very thin film of air and water2 but the enormous solid bulk within1 inert though it be1 that supports the stage on which the great drama of life is played1 is as really essential as air and water themselves4 ,if that bulk were much smaller and less massive life could find no place upon its surface4 ,,chapter ,x ,,the ,,major ,,planets ,it is a striking change to pass from ,ceres1 the giant of the minor planets1 to ,jupiter1 the giant of the major planets4 ,instead of a world that the ,earth exceeds in volume #ejjj times1 we are confronted by one that exceeds the ,earth #adjj times4 ,ceres1 when viewed through a large telescope1 is just able to present a perceptible disc2 ,jupiter offers the largest shown by any heavenly body after the ,sun and ,moon4 ,and that disc is one that never fails to charm the attentive student1 for it abounds in colour1 movement and change4 ,the late ,prof4 ,james ,keeler1 an observer of the first rank1 having the advantage of observing the planet from the summit of ,mt4 ,hamilton and with the great #cf-;inch telescope of the ,lick ,observatory1 thus describes the aspect of the planet in #ahhi4 ,seen with this instrument on a fine night1 the disc of ,jupiter was a most beautiful object1 covered with a wealth of detail which could not possibly be accurately represented in a drawing4444 ,scarcely any portion of ,jupiter1 except the ,red ,spot and the extreme polar regions1 was of a uniform tint1 the surface being mottled with flocculent and more or less irregular cloud masses4444 ,the equatorial zone1 occupying the space between the red belts1 was marked in the centre by a salmon-coloured stripe1 which was occasionally interrupted by an extension of the white clouds on the sides of the zone4 ,the edges were brilliant white1 and were formed of rounded cloud-like masses1 which at certain places extended into the red belts as long streamers4444 ,near their junction with the equatorial zone1 the streamers were white and definite in outline1 but they became redder in tint toward their outer extremities1 and more diffuse1 until they were lost in the general red colour of the background4 ,when the seeing was good they were seen to be formed of irregular rounded or feathery clouds1 fading toward the outer ends1 until the structure could no longer be distinguished4444 ,the portions of the equatorial zone surrounding the roots of well-marked streamers were somewhat brighter than at other places1 and it is a curious circumstance that they were almost invariably suffused with a pale olive-green colour1 which seemed to be associated with great disturbance1 and which was rarely seen elsewhere4444 ,the red belts presented on all occasions the appearance of a passive medium1 in which the phenomena of the streamers and other forms 444 were manifested4 ,the phenomena would be exactly reproduced by streamers of cloudy white matter floating in a semi-transparent reddish fluid1 sometimes submerged and sometimes rising to the surface4444 ,the dark spots frequently seen on the red belts usually occupied spaces left by sharp turns in the streamers1 and they were of the same colour as the belts1 but deeper in tint1 as if the fluid medium could be seen to a greater depth4#ae ,in other words1 ,jupiter is a striped or banded planet1 the bands lying along the direction of turning4 ,these bands are coloured in varying tints1 and the planet rotates very rapidly1 for the details in the bands pass quickly from one limb to the other4 ,and not only is the speed of rotation of the whole very rapid--,jupiter turns about its axis in a little less than ten hours1 so that a particle at its equator moves through #dff miles in each minute--but the various items that form the bands rotate in different times4 ,they may also alter their form and their colour4 ,jupiter seems1 then1 to be a planet with a great and rapidly changing atmosphere that extends above a shoreless sea formed of some liquified substance or substances--the whole in a state of flux4 ,but if we turn back to the ,table1 we see that ,jupiter at its mean distance from the ,sun is #e4b times that of the ,earth2 that is to say1 it receives only #a_/bgth of the light and heat that we receive4 ,but in ,chapter ,,viii1 we learnt from ,mars that as this receives only #c_/gths of the ,earth's light and heat1 its mean temperature would sink to -#cj deg4,c42 the ,earth's being #af deg4,c4 ,mars is therefore almost always a frozen planet2 frozen except on its mere surface when this is exposed to the full rays of the ,sun4 ,no sea there would ever be melted to a depth of more than a few inches1 even at noonday in midsummer4 ,and yet ,mars has at least ten times the advantages of ,jupiter4 ,jupiter1 then1 must be a frozen planet through and through2 no liquid of any sort can exist on its surface2 no vapour of any substance can exist in its atmosphere4 ,it must be icebound even at its summer noonday4 ,yet1 from the description given by ,prof4 ,keeler1 it is manifestly not so2 and another item in the ,table emphasizes that it cannot be so4 ,the density of the ,sun is #a4d that of water1 ,jupiter's is #a4cc1 showing that but a very small proportion 7if any7 of its bulk can be solid2 the rest must be vaporous1 or at least fluid4 ,how then can we reconcile these inconsistencies8 ,it is in the dimensions of ,jupiter that we find the answer4 ,the mass of the planet is #cag times that of the ,earth2 it is indeed nearly three times as great as that of all the other planets put together4 ,but the aggregation of so vast an amount of material is of itself a source of heat2 the chief source at the present time of the enormous output of heat from the ,sun is ascribed to its gradual contraction2 the slow falling of its substance1 if we may so express it1 a little nearer to its centre4 ,the great mass of ,jupiter points to its inherent store of heat being much greater than that of any other planet4 ,and of two bodies equally hot1 the larger must cool more slowly than the smaller4 ,if1 therefore1 all the members of the solar system had at one and the same moment possessed the same surface temperature1 that equality would have ceased directly they began to radiate their heat into space2 the temperature of the smaller bodies falling more rapidly than those of the larger4 ,this is another example of the principle that has already been noted1 that the properties of a small world are not those of a large world divided by a constant factor4 ,it is not possible to conceive a model of the solar system in which all the significant factors should be true to the same scale4 ,if the diameters and distances were all made on a one-tenth scale1 the surfaces would be one-hundredth of reality1 the volumes one-thousandth4 ,but a radiating body radiates from its surface1 while the store of heat from which that radiation is kept up is supplied by its volume4 ,it follows1 therefore1 that a large and heavy world must differ from a small light world1 not merely in scale1 but also in kind4 ,the surface of a world is all that we see of it2 it is1 therefore1 very commonly all that we consider4 ,but unseen1 and hence often unconsidered1 beneath the surface lies its substance or mass1 and it is this that determines the state and condition of the surface2 it is the underlying power4 ,two men may be contending in a financial struggle2 to the eye they may look alike1 equally prosperous2 both may have the same amount of money actually in their pockets2 but the one has nothing else1 the other has a great banking account and vast investments1 and is1 in fact1 a millionaire2 and it is his unseen power and resources that will make themselves felt4 ,jupiter therefore introduces us to a new factor in world-condition2 not all its heat is derived from the ,sun2 much is inherent to it4 ,and though it is not possible at present to say that the mass of ,jupiter being so much its inherent heat must be this or that quantity as a function of that mass1 yet in general1 and neglecting other considerations1 we can say that of two worlds the one with the greater mass will be that with the higher inherent temperature4 ,this factor of inherent temperature was one that did not require to be noticed in dealing with the ,moon1 or ,venus1 or ,mars1 for these and all the planets yet noticed are less in size1 surface1 volume1 and mass than the ,earth1 and hence possess less inherent heat4 ,it is only now that the greater planets are being considered that the question of a source of heat1 other than the ,sun1 can arise4 ,but the evidence of such heat on ,jupiter is not to be disputed4 ,the albedo or reflective index of ,jupiter has been put by the late ,prof4 ,g4 ,bond1 of ,harvard ,college ,observatory1 as higher than unity2 in other words1 that it emits more light than it receives4 ,this is now generally regarded as an excessive estimate1 but the albedo of the disc as a whole cannot be put lower than #j4gb1 or about that of white paper4 ,but many of the belts or dark regions are of a dull copper tint1 and the polar caps are dusky1 so that ,bond's estimate must be realized for the most brilliant zones1 as the brighter regions are called2 certainly for the whitest of the white spots4 ,no direct evidence of inherent luminosity has been obtained1 for the satellites disappear entirely in eclipse4 ,but though their shadows in transit appear very dark1 it is clear that they are not absolutely black1 since sometimes such a shadow is not distinguishable in darkness from the satellite that casts it2 a delicate proof that the background on which it falls has some intrinsic luminosity4 ,unless there is the counteracting effect of a high temperature1 the atmosphere of ,jupiter would have a pressure at the surface of #ajd lb4 to the square inch1 and the level of half pressure be attained at a mile and a quarter2 the reverse condition to that on ,mars would obtain1 and the atmosphere of ,jupiter would be much denser and much shallower than that of the ,earth4 ,denser it probably is2 shallower it cannot be1 for the great white spots1 each often five or six thousand miles in diameter1 that range themselves at times along the equatorial regions till they look like the portholes of a ship1 evidently rise from depths great even as compared with their size4 ,but it is only by intense heat that the effect of the great mass of ,jupiter in constricting its atmosphere within shallow depths can be overcome4 ,again1 the extraordinary lightness of the planet1 so little above the density of water1 points in the same direction4 ,so1 not less unmistakably1 do the magnitude and rapidity of the atmospheric movements4 ,the clouds and storms of our own atmosphere are worked by solar heat2 solar heat it is that draws up the vapours and provides the chief part of the energy manifested in the speed and strength of the air-current4 ,but solar heat can only give #a_/bgth the amount of that energy at the distance of ,jupiter1 so that1 if they were entirely dependent on solar radiation1 the winds of ,jupiter should be very feeble4 ,further1 the difference of presentment due to the difference of latitude is a fruitful cause of inequalities of temperature and pressure in the terrestrial atmosphere4 ,but as a degree of latitude on ,jupiter is eleven times as wide as on the ,earth1 such inequalities connected with a given difference in latitude are spread over eleven times the distance that they would be on the ,earth1 and are1 therefore1 so much the less pronounced4 ,yet1 across a gulf of #djj millions of miles we can clearly discern the bright zones of ,jupiter now narrowing down and constricting the red belts1 now thrust apart by them1 and can detect changes taking place in an hour of time over areas equal to that of a terrestrial hemisphere4 ,a notable peculiarity of ,jupiter is found in the proper motions of its spots4 ,many of the white spots are exceedingly swift1 giving a rotation period of #i;h4 #ejm4 while the equatorial belt in general gives a period #em4 longer2 so that in #aai rotations 7nearly #di days7 a white spot will have passed entirely round the belt1 gaining upon it at a rate of nearly #bdj miles an hour4 ,the most famous of all the markings in ,jupiter is the ,great ,red ,spot1 which became conspicuous in #ahgh1 since when the spot itself1 or at least the nest in which it lay1 has always been visible4 ,it has been identified with a great red spot observed by ,hooke and ,cassini in #affd-f1 that appeared and vanished again eight times between #affe and #agjh4 ,it therefore has had a history practically as long as our telescopic knowledge of the planet1 and may be looked upon as in some sort a permanent feature4 ,yet that it is not in the nature of a portion of a solid crust is clear4 ,it occupies on ,jupiter much the position and relative area of ,australia on the ,earth1 but whereas ,australia of necessity rotates in one piece with all the other continents1 the ,great ,red ,spot has a rotation period which is neither that of the equatorial belt1 nor of the quickly moving white spots1 and is not itself stable4 ,an ,australia on the loose is impossible1 even unthinkable here1 but the ,great ,red ,spot1 for all its long duration1 is mobile and inconstant1 and is therefore no portion of a solid permanent crust4 ,the giant planet ,jupiter1 therefore1 offers us an example of what we may call a semi-sun2 a world still bubbling with tremendous energies of its own1 still pulsing with its own inherent heat1 still without a solid crust2 probably without a solid nucleus1 liquid or vaporous throughout4 ,whatever the future may hold for such an orb1 it is clearly no world for habitation at present4 ,full of colour1 and movement1 and change as it is1 it lacks the ,earth's gloom of iron substance1 which is necessary1 no less than its veiling by the plant1 as a stage for the passion and perishing of mankind4 ,but if ,jupiter be a semi-,sun1 still a source of heat1 perhaps even of light1 can it yield the means of life to its satellites8 ,for ,jupiter is sun-like1 not merely in its own condition1 but also in that it is the centre and ruler of a system of its own4 ,we know already of eight satellites revolving round it4 ,of these eight1 only four--the four discovered by ,galileo1 in the first days of his possession of a telescope--need be considered2 the other four are of the same order of size as the asteroids1 and are indeed much smaller than ,ceres4 ,but the ,galilean satellites are of a higher rank4 ,europa1 the smallest1 is in size a twin to the ,moon2 ,callisto1 the outermost1 is almost exactly the size of ,mercury2 ,io1 the innermost1 is midway between the two in its dimensions4 ,but ,ganymede1 the largest1 is almost comparable with ,mars1 its diameter being #j4de that of the ,earth instead of the #j4ec of ,mars4 ,but the ,moon1 ,mercury1 and ,mars have all been shown1 on the ground of their small size1 to be worlds unfit for habitation2 the satellites of ,jupiter are1 therefore1 all rejected on the same score4 ,nor can the greater nearness of their immediate primary compensate for their remoteness from the ,sun4 ,it is true that ,jupiter presents to ,ganymede a disc with more than #bjj times the apparent area that the ,sun presents to the ,earth1 but to make up for the falling-off of the solar radiation1 each unit of this area should radiate about #a_/bejth as much heat as each unit of the ,sun's surface4 ,in other words1 the absolute surface temperature of ,jupiter should be #a_/dth that of the ,sun1 or about #aeej deg4 ,c41 and this is higher than can be admitted4 ,the ,sun and ,jupiter together cannot put ,ganymede in as favourable a position as ,mars1 much less as favourable as the ,earth4 ,the case of ,jupiter carries with it those of ,saturn1 ,uranus1 and ,neptune4 ,all three1 from their high albedoes and low densities1 are still in a vaporous condition2 still in some sort1 semi-,suns2 sources of a certain amount of heat1 and not recipients merely4 ,the days are yet far distant when a solid crust can form on any one of them1 and the water condense from the steamy atmosphere to form oceans1 seas1 and rivers4 ,not till then1 if at all1 when water as a liquid1 water that flows1 is present1 can life begin to appear and enter on its long course of change4 ,,chapter ,,xi ,,when ,,the ,,major ,,planets ,,cool ,the question has been asked3 ,it is evident that life cannot exist at the present time on the outer planets1 since they are in a highly heated and quasi-solar condition2 but when they cool down1 as cool they must1 and a solid crust is formed1 may not a time come when they will be habitable8 ,it seems impossible to think that worlds so beautiful to our eyes and so vast in scale are destined never to be peopled by intelligent beings4 ,it is clearly difficult to answer satisfactorily a question that requires so deep a plunge into the recesses of the unknown future2 yet1 so far as our knowledge goes1 there is no reason to think that ,jupiter will be more habitable then than it is now4 ,the difficulty of the small supply of light and heat received from the ,sun would apparently still remain1 if indeed1 the cooling of the ,sun itself would not increase it4 ,we do not know of any means by which our ,sun could so increase its radiation as to supply to ,jupiter from #be to #cj times as much heat as it now receives1 and this would be necessary to place it in the same favoured condition as the ,earth4 ,if so great a change were to take place in the ,sun1 life would be scorched out of existence on all planets nearer than ,jupiter1 and1 similarly1 if the solar emission were increased to meet the necessities of ,uranus or ,neptune1 even ,jupiter would fall a victim4 ,but we may consider it as a conceivable case that a planet of the exact dimensions of ,jupiter may be revolving in an annual period of the same length as his1 round some star that is capable of affording it adequate nourishment2 and so with the three other giant planets4 ,the actual ,jupiter and ,saturn of the solar system have1 so far as we can tell1 neither present nor future as habitable worlds1 but we can consider what would be the case of imaginary bodies of similar dimensions in systems where the supply of heat would be sufficient4 ,or we can neglect the question of temperature altogether1 as we did at first in the case of ,mars4 ,all the four planets must shrink much in volume before their solidification will take place4 ,their average density at present but little exceeds that of water2 indeed1 ,saturn is not so dense as water2 yet we must suppose that the same elements are in general common to the ,earth and to them all4 ,if we assume1 then1 that the four planets all cool to the point of solidification1 their densities must be much increased1 and their volumes correspondingly diminished4 ,since all four greatly exceed the ,earth in mass1 it is but natural to expect that1 when they have assumed the terrestrial condition1 they will be more closely compacted than the ,earth1 and their densities in consequence will be greater4 ,it will1 however1 be simpler if we assume exactly the same density for them as for the ,earth4 ,jupiter will then have shrunk to about one-fourth of its present volume1 and the statistics for the four planets will run as in the following ,table3 ,,statistics ,,of ,,the ,,four ,,outer ,,planets ,,if ,,with ,,the ,,same ,,density ,,as ,,the ,,earth ,,proportions ,,of ,,the ,,planets3-- ,uranus ,neptune ,saturn ,jupiter ,diameter in miles #aicjj #bjdjj #cfjjj #edjjj do ,symbol #a #b4dd #b4eg #d4ef #f4hb ,surface1 ,symbol #a #f4j #f4f #bj4h #df4f ,mass and ,volume1 ,symbol #a #ad4f #ag4j #id4h #cag4g ,gravity at surface1 ,symbol #a #b4dd #b4eg #d4ef #f4hb ,rate of ,fall1 ,feet in the ,first ,second #ci4b #da4c #gc4c #aji4g ,,atmosphere1 assuming the total mass of the atmosphere to be proportional to the mass of the planet3-- ,pressure at the surface in lb4 per square inch #hh4b #ig4j #cje4h #fhe4j ,pressure at the surface in atmospheres #f4j #f4f #bj4h #df4f ,level of half-pressure in miles #a4cg #a4cj #j4gc #j4di ,boiling point of water at surface #abg deg4,c #abi deg4,c #adh deg4,c #afd deg4,c ,jupiter offers two peculiarities4 ,in its shrunken condition1 its diameter1 instead of being eleven times that of the ,earth1 will be not quite seven1 and the force of gravity at the surface will be greater than that of the ,earth in the same proportion4 ,a man who here weighs #aej lb4 will there weigh over #ajjj lb42 and the muscular effort of movement will be increased in the same ratio4 ,the athlete who here can clear a height #e ft4 #h in4 will there1 with like pains1 surmount #aj inches2 and other efforts will be in the same proportion4 ,the atmosphere1 supposing it to be in proportion to the mass of ,jupiter1 will exercise a pressure of #df-a_/b atmospheres1 or more than #fhj lb41 to the square inch4 ,following on this enormous pressure at the surface would be the rapidity with which the atmosphere would thin out in the upward direction4 ,the level of half-pressure would be attained by ascending less than half a mile in height2 that is to say1 there would be a difference of pressure of #cdj lb4 on the square inch from that experienced at the sea-level4 ,we know from the fact that fishes live at enormous depths in the ocean1 that living organisms can be constructed to endure great pressures1 but they are not constructed to endure great alterations of pressure4 ,the deep-sea fishes are as instantly killed by being brought up to the surface1 as the surface fishes or the land animals would be if they were plunged into the depths4 ,and it is clear that on ,jupiter a low range of hills that on the ,earth would be considered only an easy climb1 would be an impassable barrier1 not only from the immense exertion of mounting it1 but chiefly from the unendurable change of pressure which the ascent would involve4 ,the sevenfold gravity of ,jupiter1 taken in connection with this enormous atmospheric pressure1 would tend to make the meteorological disturbances of the planet violent far beyond anything of which the ,earth can furnish an example4 ,the atmosphere would possess a high viscosity1 and differences in condition1 pressure and saturation would tend to accumulate1 until at length the balance would be restored with explosive suddenness and force4 ,here our most violent tornadoes may reach a speed of #ajj miles an hour2 on ,jupiter1 gales of five or six times that velocity would be common4 ,we cannot conceive that living organisms would be able to grow1 flourish and multiply where the conditions were so cataclysmic4 ,this difficulty must always exist where the planet is great in mass1 and the force of gravity high at the surface4 ,the case of ,saturn is not so extreme as that of ,jupiter1 though it is probably sufficiently severe to exclude it from the ranks of worlds that could ever be dwelt in4 ,the atmospheric pressure would be about #ba atmospheres1 or more than #cjj lb4 on the square inch4 ,the level of half-pressure would be reached at about three-quarters of a mile1 and the force of gravity be nearly #d-a_/b times that of the ,earth4 ,but the serious condition for ,saturn would come from that feature which renders it by far the most attractive of all the planets seen in the telescope1 the presence of the wonderful ,ring system4 ,to us1 viewing ,saturn from afar1 and from practically the same direction as the ,sun1 the ,rings are seen lit up2 but to a dweller on ,saturn1 the ,rings during the day are between his world and the ,sun1 and hence turn their dark side toward him4 ,more than that1 the telescope shows us that the ,rings cast a shadow on the planet2 in other words1 they eclipse part of it2 and this shadow changes its position with the progress of the ,saturnian year4 ,proctor computed that if the ,rings were a hundred miles in thickness1 the equator would suffer1 in consequence1 total eclipse for nearly ten days at each equinox1 and partial eclipse for about forty days more4 ,moving away from the equator1 each higher latitude would have a longer and longer period of eclipse in the winter half of its year2 the higher the latitude1 the later after the autumnal equinox the eclipse would begin1 and the longer it would last1 until about latitude #dj deg4 was reached4 ,here the eclipses would begin nearly three terrestrial years after the time of the autumnal equinox4 ,at first the ,sun would be eclipsed only in the morning and evening of each day1 but the length of the daily eclipse would increase1 until the ,sun was hidden the whole day long4 ,this period of total eclipse would last for about #f years #h months1 terrestrial reckoning1 or with the periods of partial eclipse1 #h years and nearly #aj months4 ,whatever the efficiency of the ,sun that afforded light and heat to such a planet1 it is clear that such eclipses must be fatal to life in two ways3 light and heat would be cut off from wide regions of the planet for long periods of time1 and terrible meteorological convulsions must follow in the train4 ,here on the ,earth1 though a total eclipse generally lasts only two or three minutes1 the atmospheric disturbance is perceptible1 and the fall of temperature very marked1 and it does not require much reflection to see that the analogous disturbance in an atmosphere twenty times as dense must be terrific indeed during an eclipse that lasts not a few minutes only1 but for more than six of our years4 ,the case of ,uranus introduces us to another class of conditions fatal to habitability4 ,the equator of ,jupiter is inclined only #c deg4 to the plane of its orbit2 the difference in its seasons is1 therefore1 almost imperceptible2 there is hardly any alteration in the incidence of the solar rays2 it is1 as if on the ,earth1 the height of the ,sun at noon in mid-winter were what it actually is on the #adth of ,march1 and its height at midsummer the same as we observe on ,march #bh4 ,the inclination of the equator of ,saturn is considerably greater than that of ,mars or the ,earth1 so that its seasons are more pronounced1 but not to an extent that would introduce any radical difference4 ,but for ,uranus1 the inclination of the equator to the plane of the orbit is #hb deg4 ,if this were the case for the ,earth1 the noonday sun for ,london would be1 at the spring equinox1 #ch-a_/b deg4 high as at present1 but its altitude day by day would increase with great rapidity1 and before the end of ,april1 the ,sun at noon would be right in the zenith1 and #ac deg4 above the horizon at midnight4 ,at midsummer1 indeed1 it would be only #ei deg4 high at noonday1 but it would be north of the zenith instead of south1 and at technical midnight1 it would still be #dd deg4 in altitude1 thus moving round in a very small circle1 only #ae deg4 in diameter4 ,from about ,april #ah to ,august #be--that is to say1 for #abi days--the ,sun would never set1 and unlike the summer day of our own polar regions now1 wherein the ,sun1 though always present1 is always low down in the sky1 for much of that period it would pass the meridian quite close to the zenith4 ,as the year of ,uranus is #hd times the length of our year1 the ,london of ,uranus would have to endure not far short of #cj years continuous scorching4 ,and the winter would be as long2 the perpetual day of summer would be replaced by a night as enduring4 ,more than #bi years of unbroken darkness1 of unmitigated cold1 cannot possibly ever consist with the conditions necessary for life upon a planet4 ,whatever the brightness of the imagined sun of ,uranus1 if for #bi years at a time that sun were below the horizon1 the water on the planet must be congealed1 and during the #bi years of unbroken day all the water would be as certainly evaporated4 ,thus1 though ,uranus is not burdened by the enormous mass of ,jupiter1 nor overshadowed1 like ,saturn1 by a system of rings1 the extraordinary inclination of its axis introduces a condition which is as fatal to it1 as a world to dwell in1 as any of the disabilities of the other planets4 ,it is curious that these four outer planets1 that resemble each other so strikingly in many of their conditions--in their vast size1 high albedo1 low density1 and vaporous envelopes1 that show1 in their spectra1 not merely the lines of reflected sunlight1 but also special lines due to their own atmospheres 7the chief of these being common to all the four planets7--should yet1 in the inclination of their axes to the plane of their orbits1 display every possible variety4 ,the axis of ,jupiter is almost normal to its orbit1 that of ,uranus lies almost in the plane of its orbit4 ,the axes of ,saturn and ,neptune have a mean inclination1 but it would appear that the rotation of ,neptune is in the reverse direction to that of planets in general1 so that the true inclination is usually taken as being the complement of the observed angle1 as if the axis were turned right over4 ,it is uncertain whether this would have any important effect upon the habitability of the planet1 but it supplies the fourth possible case for the position of the axis4 ,,chapter ,,xii ,,the ,,final ,,question ,in passing in review the various members of the solar system1 it has been seen that there are many conditions that have to be fulfilled before a planet can be regarded as the possible abode of life1 because there are many conditions necessary in order that water may exist on its surface in the liquid state4 ,the size and mass of the planet are restricted within quite narrow limits2 and a world much larger or much smaller than our own is necessarily excluded4 ,the supply of light and heat received from the ,sun must not fall much below that received by the ,earth1 nor greatly exceed it2 in other words1 the distance of the planet from its ,sun is somewhat precisely fixed1 since the light and heat vary inversely not as the distance1 but as its square4 ,of course1 in different systems1 with suns of different power1 the most favourable distance will not be the same in each2 but in any system there will be one most advantageous distance1 and no great departure from it will be possible4 ,this condition further implies that the planetary orbits must be nearly circular2 pronounced eccentricity1 such as the orbits of even our short-period comets display1 would be fatal to the persistence of water in the liquid state1 and hence to the continuance of life4 ,a wide discordance between the planes of the planet's equator and of its orbit1 by rendering the seasons extravagantly diverse1 would act as prejudicially as an eccentric orbit1 and a rotation period equal to that of revolution would mean that one hemisphere was eternally frozen while the other was exposed to perpetual heat4 ,it follows that in any given system there can be at most only one or two planets upon which life can find a home1 and this only where the right conditions of size and mass1 of rotation period1 inclination of axis1 and shape of orbit1 all co-exist in a globe at the proper distance4 ,but the type of system offered by our ,sun and his planets is not the only one that exists4 ,a very large proportion of stars are binaries--two suns revolve round their common centre of gravity4 ,in many cases the two suns are separable in the telescope1 and their relative movements can be measured2 in other cases1 termed spectroscopic binaries1 we only learn that a star which appears absolutely single has two components from the evidence of its spectrum2 the spectroscope revealing two sets of lines that vibrate to and fro with respect to each other4 ,yet1 again1 a third class of double stars has made itself known in the ,algol variables4 ,the optical double stars are cases where the two components are far distant from each other1 and hence can be distinguished in our telescopes as separate points of light4 ,the spectroscopic binaries are cases where the two components are too close to be separately perceived1 but where the two are not greatly unequal in brightness1 so that the spectrum of the one does not overpower that of the other4 ,the ,algol variables are cases where the two components are of very unequal brightness1 and1 being very close to each other1 are so placed with respect to the ,earth that the fainter partly eclipses the brighter in its revolution round it1 and so causes a temporary diminution in its light at regular intervals4 ,all these three classes of binary systems are now known to be very numerous4 ,prof4 ,campbell estimates that fully one star in six is a spectroscopic binary4 ,but there must be many binary systems that do not reveal themselves--double stars where the companion is too faint or too close to be detected1 ,algol systems where the companion does not pass before its primary--and it seems almost certain that simple systems1 like that of which our ,sun is the unchallenged autocrat1 must be comparatively rare4 ,but the problem of the movements of a planet attendant upon two or more suns is one of amazing complexity1 and our greatest mathematicians have as yet only been able to deal with the approximate solution of a few very special cases4 ,these are1 however1 sufficient to show that the orbit of a planet so placed would be most irregular2 the variations in the supplies of light and heat received would be as great as even comets experience within the solar system1 and1 what would be more disastrous still1 these variations would not be periodic but irregular4 ,one year would be unlike that which preceded it1 and would be followed by changed conditions in the next4 ,plants and animals would never have the chance of acclimatizing themselves to these ever-changing vicissitudes4 ,the stability of condition essential for the maintenance of water in a liquid state would be wanting2 and1 in consequence1 ,life could neither come into existence1 nor persist if it once appeared4 ,so far1 therefore1 our line of thought has led us to recognize that ,life can exist in comparatively few of the innumerable stellar systems strewn through infinite space1 and in any given system it can at best find only one or two homes4 ,the conditions for a ,life-bearing planet are thus both numerous and stringent--there is no elasticity about them4 ,it is not sufficient that a planet might fulfil many or even most of these conditions2 failure in one is failure altogether2 one black ball excludes2 the candidate who fails in a single subject is ploughed without mercy4 ,and in most cases the failure is final2 no opportunity is given to the candidate to sit again4 ,but ,space is not the only horizon along which our thought must be directed2 there is also the horizon of ,time4 ,every world must have its ,past and its ,future1 as well as its ,present4 ,for some worlds the conditions are so fixed that1 like ,jupiter and ,saturn1 they are not now worlds that can be dwelt in1 they never were in that condition1 and they never can be2 their enormous mass forbids it4 ,mercury and the ,moon at the other end of the planetary scale are also permanently disabled2 their insignificant size excludes them4 ,there was also a time when the ,earth was not a world of habitation2 it was without form and void2 hot and vaporous1 even as the four outer planets are now4 ,now it is inhabited1 but there may come a time when this phase of its history has run its course1 and either from a falling off in the tribute of light and heat rendered to it by the ,sun1 or from the gradual desiccation of the surface1 or1 perchance1 from the slow loss of its atmosphere1 it may approach the condition of ,mars1 and in its turn be no longer an abode of life4 ,many planets are essentially debarred from ever entering on the vital stage2 but of those to which such a stage is possible1 it can only form an incident in the entire duration of the orb4 ,and if our ,earth is any type or example of the vital stage in general1 vast aeons must run their course from the first appearance of the humblest germs of life up to the bringing forth of ,life in conscious ,intelligence4 ,one hundred million years are freely spoken of in this connection by those who study the crust of the ,earth and those who are occupied with the relations of the varied forms of life4 ,man is the latest arrival on this planet1 and however far back we try to push the time of his earliest appearance1 it is beyond question that that time1 relatively to the entire duration of the ,earth since a solid crust began to form1 is but as yesterday4 ,if1 from some other globe in the depths of space1 this world of ours could have been watched during the long aeons that elapsed from its first separation from the solar nebula down to the time when it first possessed a surface of land and water1 and from that time1 again1 throughout the hypothetical one hundred million years that preceded the advent of man1 then1 during all those aeons1 those imagined observers would have had under their scrutiny a world as yet without inhabitant4 ,the ,earth now is in the inhabited condition1 but science gives us no clue as to how long that condition will endure2 rather such hints as are afforded us would seem to point to its lasting but for a brief season as compared with the indefinite duration which preceded it1 and the indefinite duration which shall follow4 ,if this thought be sound1 it places before us an entirely new and most serious consideration4 ,the world predestined for habitation must not only have its size within certain narrow limits1 its distance from its central sun in a certain narrow zone1 its rotation period1 the inclination of its axis1 the eccentricity of its orbit1 all suitable alike1 but even if in these and in all other necessaries it is perfectly adapted for habitation1 yet it will be only during a relatively small fraction of its entire duration that ,intelligent ,life1 clothed in material form1 will find a place upon it4 ,let us sum shortly what we know and what we conclude4 ,we know that this1 our ,earth1 is a habitable globe1 for we ourselves are living upon it4 ,we know what constitutes the physical basis of our life1 and under what conditions on this ,earth it flourishes1 and under what conditions it is destroyed4 ,if we turn our eyes from this1 our ,earth1 and look out upon the starry skies1 we see the other planets of our system1 and the suns which are the centres of other systems4 ,from the consideration of the planets in our own system1 we have seen how stringent and how many are the conditions imposed for ,life to be possible4 ,round our ,sun there is but a narrow zone in which a habitable world may circle2 in this zone there is room for but few worlds1 and we actually know of three alone1 the ,earth1 the ,moon1 and ,venus4 ,we know that the ,earth can be and is inhabited2 that the ,moon is not and cannot be inhabited2 and that ,venus1 though of habitable size1 may yet be subject to the fatal disqualification of always turning the same face to the ,sun4 ,of other planetary systems than our own1 we actually know of none1 but we assume that there are such1 and as numerous as there are suns in the starry depths4 ,but of these planetary systems we can rule out1 as containing no habitable member1 all such as circle round double or multiple suns or1 indeed1 round any single star that1 from whatever cause1 is largely variable and1 therefore1 much less stable than our own4 ,mira ,ceti1 which in #e months increases its brightness #ajjj times1 may stand as an example4 ,probably these disqualifications rule out of court the great proportion of the stellar systems4 ,of the few1 comparatively speaking1 single and stable suns that remain in the heavenly abyss1 we must conclude1 from what we know of our solar system1 that they1 too1 have but a narrow zone1 outside of which no world would be fit to dwell in2 whilst in the zone the few worlds which might exist must violate no one of many strict conditions4 ,if we assume that there are a hundred million stars within the ken of our telescopes1 we may well believe that not more than one in a hundred of these would fulfil the condition of being a single and stable sun1 such as ours4 ,of the planets revolving round these million suns--stable and efficient suns--can we expect that in more cases than one in a hundred there will be a planet in the habitable zone fulfilling all the other conditions of habitability1 of size1 mass1 inclination of axis1 circular orbit1 and rotation8 ,of these ten thousand earths which may be made fit for the habitation of ,man1 can we assume that even one in a hundred is now at that epoch in its history when it is no longer without form and void1 when a division has been made between the waters under the firmament and those that are above the firmament2 when the waters under the heaven have been gathered into one place1 and the dry land has appeared1 and when the earth and the waters have brought forth life abundantly8 ,out of a hundred million of planetary systems throughout the depths of space1 can we suppose that there are even one hundred worlds that are actually inhabited at the present moment8 ,these numbers and proportions certainly are not1 and cannot be1 based on knowledge2 they are given as illustrations only2 but1 vague as they are1 they suggest that our ,earth may be neither one of many inhabited earths1 nor yet unique1 but one of a few--indeed of a very few4 ,and then the objection is raised3 ,if our own ,earth is but one of1 perhaps1 two inhabited worlds in the solar system2 and of perhaps one or two hundred inhabited worlds throughout the furthest space that we can scan2 why is all this waste8 ,of all the countless millions of stellar systems without living organisms as inhabitants1 we cannot tell the purpose for the simple reason that we do not know it2 but of waste in the solar system1 there is no question4 ,relatively speaking1 this is quite insignificant1 for we cannot consider that as waste material which is useful and1 indeed1 essential to existence4 ,for1 consider first the material in the ,earth itself4 ,its total volume is #bfj1fac1jjj1jjj cubic miles1 but man only lives upon its surface of less than #bjj million square miles in extent1 and he can not probe down as far as ten miles below it1 through the depths of ocean or by his deepest mine4 ,thus we are left with over #beh thousand million of cubic miles that man1 or plant1 or beast can never make direct use of4 ,but without this #beh thousand million cubic miles that he can never sow nor reap1 the overlying platform on which he dwells would be useless for retaining the air or the water by which he lives4 ,no less essential is the ,sun2 its vast bulk of #b1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj1jjj tons can1 in no single unit1 be counted waste1 for it is from this that the heat and light necessary for life on the ,earth is derived4 ,but the tonnage of all the planets combined is but #j4ac per cent of the ,sun alone2 and a wastage1 if such it is1 like this is insignificant from a material point of view4 ,there is a type of politician at the present day who is convinced that the highest purpose to which land can be put is to build upon it2 that being1 in general1 the use giving the highest money return per square foot1 though the return does not always fall to the builder4 ,it has taken not a little agitation and popular pressure to enforce the truth that cultivated land is also of use4 ,but there are few who realize that land that is neither built upon nor cultivated is also essential4 ,our barren moors and bleak hillsides1 wastelands as we call them1 are absolutely necessary as collectors of the water by which we live4 ,from them our springs take their source2 and they supply our cities with the first necessity of life4 ,we find1 then1 in this universe so far as we can know it1 that ,space is lavishly provided1 ,matter is lavishly scattered1 ,time is unsparingly drawn upon1 but ,life in any form1 and especially in its highest form1 is1 relatively speaking1 very sparsely given4 ,that very circumstance surely points to the overwhelming importance of conscious1 intelligent ,life1 and the insignificance of lifeless matter in comparison with it4 ,we have to exhaust arithmetic in computing the size1 the mass1 the output of heat and light of our ,sun1 yet it is but the hearth-fire and lamp of terrestrial life2 and its amazing agglomeration of matter and energy is ungrudgingly devoted to this humble purpose4 ,whatever view we hold as to the scheme of the universe2 whether with the unthinking we fail to recognize ,thought and ,purpose behind its marvellous manifestations1 or1 with the thoughtful1 realize that only ,infinite ,thought could provide so wonderfully for the bringing forth of thought in living material organisms1 the conclusion still remains3 living intelligences are1 by the direct testimony of the universe itself1 its noblest and most precious product4 ,the plea is often made that as we find life adapting itself to a great variety of conditions on this ,earth1 we must not set limits to its power of adaption to the conditions of other worlds4 ,but this plea is an unthinking one4 ,the range of conditions through which we find life on this ,earth is as nothing to the range given by the varied sizes and positions of the different planets2 and even on our ,earth1 life in the unfavoured regions--the tops of mountains1 the polar snows1 the waterless deserts1 the ocean depths--is only possible because there are more favoured regions close at hand1 and there are1 as it were1 crumbs that fall from the rich man's table4 ,a well-known litterateur in setting forth a hundred ways of making money gave great prominence to the method of living as caretaker in an empty house4 ,but residing in an empty house does not1 in itself1 supply the means of sustenance2 these have to be furnished by the wealthier man who employs the caretaker4 ,another plea for vague sentiment in this matter is that we cannot expect that intelligent beings on other worlds would have the same form as man1 and if not the same form1 then1 that the same conditions of existence would not hold good for them as for us4 ,both contentions are unsound4 ,protoplasm is the physical basis of all the life that we know1 whatever its form2 though these forms are to be counted by the million1 and are as diverse as they are numerous4 ,and everywhere and always1 water is found essential to protoplasmic life4 ,of life of any other kind we do not know any examples2 we have no instance2 if such exist1 then they are beyond our ken4 ,and neither anthropologist nor biologist would admit that the form of intelligent life was an unrelated accident4 ,whether the form brought the intelligence1 or the intelligence the form1 or both were evolved together1 the one reacting on the other1 the human form and the human intelligence are associated1 and we feel this to be so of necessity4 ,in #ahia1 ,dr4 ,eugene ,dubois found in ,java a molar tooth and a portion of a skull1 and later the thigh bone of the left leg1 and two more teeth4 ,such as they were1 these relics appeared nearer in form to the corresponding fragments of an average ,australian than to those of an ape1 and on this ground intelligence was claimed for the creature of which they were the remains1 and it was given the name of ,pithecanthropus1 or ,ape-,man4 ,the discovery aroused much discussion1 but on all sides it was unhesitatingly assumed that the difference between the form of ,pithecanthropus and that of the most similar ape was an index of its superior intelligence over the ape1 just in so far as that difference was in the direction of the modern human form4 ,the same remark applies to the recent discovery of very ancient human remains in ,sussex4 ,never at any time has it been supposed that the physical frame has followed any other path in the evolution of intelligence than that which brought forth man4 ,the flesh-eating animals have attained efficiency in hunting and warfare by variation along many types of form2 the herbivora have been not less varied in the forms by which as races they secured themselves from destruction2 but ,thought has been associated with the development of one type or form only1 and the entire future of ,thought on this planet rested neither with mammoth nor cave-bear1 but with the possessor of the erect stature1 the upward look1 the differentiation of hand and foot1 even in their crudest and earliest stages4 ,swift1 in ,gulliver's ,travels1 conceived of a land where the intelligence and conscience of ,man dwelt in the form of the horse1 and the human form tabernacled the instincts of the beast4 ,h4 ,g4 ,wells1 in his ,war of the ,worlds1 attributed intelligence to monsters--half-cuttlefish and half-anemone1--and the human form to their helpless1 unresisting prey4 ,both conceptions are as scientifically absurd as they are gross and revolting2 and if it were possible for the skeleton of creatures from other worlds to be brought to us here1 then biologists would as confidently pronounce on their intelligence as they do on the extinct forms of bygone ages--the nearer to the human form1 the nearer to the human mind4 ,we have found the figures of reindeer1 horse1 and mammoth scratched in outline on a mammoth tusk2 but though the artist has left no other trace1 we need no further evidence of his bodily form4 ,neither horse1 nor reindeer1 nor mammoth made those rough outlines2 they were drawn by a man4 ,more striking still1 ,france yields us chipped flints by the million1 flints so slightly shaped that it is in dispute whether they may not have been so broken by the action of torrents4 ,but there are only two theories about them2 either they were so chipped by natural action1 or they were designedly so chipped by creatures resembling ourselves in head and hand4 ,the question that has been dealt with in this volume is a scientific one1 and the attempt has been made to treat it as such1 and to argue from known physical facts as to the conditions of worlds which we cannot visit4 ,but by many the question is generally discussed wholly apart from physical facts at all1 and it becomes one of sentiment and of religious sympathy4 ,yet1 curiously enough1 the division between those who think that all worlds must be inhabited and those who think that our own world stands alone is not coincident with any line of theological divisions1 but rather cuts across all such4 ,some believers in ,christianity argue that since ,god has filled this world with ,life1 ,life has been ,his purpose in the world1 and must therefore have been ,his purpose in all other worlds--they too must be filled with ,life in like manner4 ,other believers argue that this world was the scene of the ,incarnation of ,our ,lord1 and is therefore unique in that respect2 and that this uniqueness sets its stamp upon this world in all respects4 ,opponents to ,christianity are divided into the same two classes1 the one arguing that wherever there is matter the inevitable course of evolution will produce life1 and eventually intelligent life4 ,the other class are equally clear that all forms of life are special1 the result of the particular environment1 and that it is unreasonable to expect that any other world has had the same history as our own1 or that the same special conditions have prevailed elsewhere4 ,in other words the belief that there are other inhabited worlds has depended chiefly neither on science nor on religious belief1 but upon sentiment4 ,there are some who like to think themselves1 and the race to which they belong1 altogether exceptional2 others delight in finding themselves reflected wherever they look4 ,so far as ,science has progressed and can return an answer to an enquiry that exceeds so far the bounds of our direct observation1 it dissents from both orders of thought4 ,the conditions of life are indeed narrow1 special1 restricted2 intelligent1 organic life must1 relatively speaking1 be a rarity in the universe1 but we lack the information that would enable us to affirm with any confidence that such life is only to be found upon this world of ours4 ,heavy as the odds are against any particular world being an inhabited one1 yet when the limitless extent of space is considered1 and the innumerable numbers of stars and systems of stars1 it seems but reasonable to conclude that though inhabited worlds are relatively rare1 the absolute number of them may be considerable2 considerable1 if not at one particular moment of time1 yet when the whole duration of the universe is admitted4 ,but there is a religious question connected with this enquiry2 one that goes down to the very roots of man's deepest thoughts and aspirations4 ,as individuals our days on the ,earth are as a shadow1 and there is none abiding2 as individuals we pass and disappear2 and though the race remains1 yet as far as science can guide us and enable us to penetrate the future1 the same lot awaits the race as well4 ,slowly but surely the water of a planet will combine with its substance or disappear into its crust4 ,the cooling of the ,sun1 though it may be long delayed1 would seem to be inevitable in the sequel4 ,oh1 life as futile then as frail4 99 99 99 99 ,what hope of answer or redress8 ,behind the veil1 behind the veil4 ,it is to this veil that we are now brought4 ,it seems impossible to believe that ,life1 so rare a fruit of the universe1 intelligent ,life1 conscious ,life1 to which the long course of evolution has been so manifestly leading up all through the long ages1 should have no better destiny than a final and hopeless extinction2 that this ,earth and all the efforts and aspirations of the long generations of men should have no worthier end than to swing1 throughout the eternal ages1 an empty1 frozen heap of dust1 circling round the extinct cinder that was once its ,sun4 ,if we look backward1 we seem to discern clear signs of progress2 if we look forward1 we discern nothing but the veil4 ,science is but organized experience1 and experience of the future we have none4 ,there was a time when on this world there was no life2 a time when life began4 ,how did it begin8 ,under what conditions8 ,of that great change--when non-living matter first became endowed with life1 became so endowed not by the action and intervention of other living matter1 but without it--we have no knowledge1 no experience4 ,and so long as this continues to be the case1 that change1 the greatest physical change that has yet taken place in the history of the universe1 the first change of the non-living into the living1 is outside the reach of science2 it lies beyond its border4 ,we may guess and speculate about it1 but speculation is not science2 we may spin words about it with the utmost skill of the dialectician1 but metaphysics is not science2 it can never come within the scope of science until it has first come within the scope of experience4 ,there is1 therefore1 a veil behind us as well as the one that encloses us in front2 and as hitherto ,science has failed to pierce the veil of the past1 it is even less able to pierce the veil of the future2 for of the future we have no experience4 99 99 99 99 99 ,here1 then1 our enquiry must end1 for it is an enquiry of physical science2 the search for living material organisms endowed with intelligence4 ,how life first came upon this ,earth1 or when1 or where1 is beyond the power of science to determine4 ,yet it did come4 ,there was a time when there was no life here2 none1 not even the humblest form of it2 nor was there any hint or foreshadowing of it1 still less of all its infinities of form1 and possibilities of development4 ,once ,life was not1 yet ,life came1 and now1 life is abundant1 but abundant only in worlds quite exceptional in their conditions1 and therefore few in number2 it is even conceivable that this ,earth of ours may be unique4 ,but life as we know it1 protoplasmic life1 life dependent upon water1 the life of intelligence united to the material organism1 is under sentence of death4 ,has it any future beyond that veil8 ,is there any kind of life not subject to these narrow limitations2 not under the inexorable decree8 ,to questions such as these ,science has no reply to give2 it is even more helpless to answer them than to determine how life first came2 its experience does not reach so far4 ,science can examine the present conditions of physical life1 but whether or no that life can undergo a change greater than that which passed upon the old inorganic world1 it cannot determine4 ,it has no experience4 ,but if ,science is dumb1 if the utmost exertion of human energy and power of research can throw no light on a future of which we have no experience1 we are not left without an answer4 ,a voice has been heard1 the voice of the ,son of ,god ,himself3 ,i am the ,resurrection and the ,life4 ,he that believeth on ,me1 though he were dead1 yet shall he live4 ,and accepting ,his word1 the ,church in all ages1 and among all nations1 peoples1 and tongues1 has made reply3 ,i ,,look ,,for ,,the ,,resurrection ,,of ,,the ,,dead ,,and ,,the ,,life ,,of ,,the ,,world ,,to ,,come4 ,,index ,abbot1 ,c4 ,g41 #bg1 #cd ,albedo of ,earth1 #ed1 #ha ---- ,jupiter1 #abg ---- ,mars1 #ha ---- ,moon1 #ed ,albumin sol1 #ae ,algol-type stars1 #ce1 #add1 #ade ,antares1 #ch ,antoniadi1 ,e4 ,m41 #ig1 #ajd ,archangel1 climate of1 #hg1 #hh ,arcturus1 #ce1 #cg ,aristarchus1 lunar crater1 #dh ,astronomical unit1 #ba ,atmosphere of1 ,mars1 #gf ----1 ,moon1 #ec ----1 ,sun1 #be ----1 ,venus1 #aab ,barnard1 ,e4 ,e41 #hi1 #ajd ,beer1 #fj1 #ig1 #ih ,bond1 ,g4 ,p41 #abg1 #abh ,brewster1 ,sir ,david1 #d ,calcium1 #ab1 #cf ,callisto1 satellite of ,jupiter1 #aca ,calory1 #bf ,campbell1 ,w4 ,w41 #ade ,carbon1 #aa1 #cd1 #ch1 #ci ,carbonic acid1 #aa ,cassini1 #ei1 #fj1 #acj ,ceres1 minor planet1 #da1 #abj1 #aba1 #abb1 #aca ,cerulli1 ,v41 #ajd1 #ajh ,chromosphere1 #bh1 #bi ,cobalt1 #cc ,comet1 ,encke's1 #aai ----1 ,halley's1 #aai ----1 spectra1 #ch ,copernican theory1 #a ,copper1 #cc ,corona1 #dj ,coxwell1 #be1 #ge1 #gi ,cyanogen1 #cg1 #ch ,czapek1 ,f41 #aa1 #ac ,darwin1 ,sir ,g4 ,h41 #aaf ,dawes1 ,w4 ,r41 #fj1 #fc1 #ig1 #ii ,denning1 ,w4 ,f41 #ajd ,dispersion1 anomalous1 #bh ,doppelmayer1 lunar crater1 #eb ,dubois1 ,eugene1 #aee ,eros1 minor planet1 #eg ,europa1 satellite of ,jupiter1 #aca ,evans1 ,j4 ,e41 #ajg ,faculae1 #bi1 #cj ,fauth1 ,p41 #ej ,flamsteed1 lunar crater1 #eb ,fluorine1 #dj ,fraunhofer1 #cc ,galileo1 #ea1 #ei1 #aca ,ganymede1 satellite of ,jupiter1 #aca1 #acb ,gay-,lussac1 #ge ,glaisher1 ,j41 #be1 #ge1 #gi ,goodacre1 ,w41 #di ,green1 ,n4 ,e41 #fj1 #fb1 #fc ,greenwich ,hospital ,school1 #ajg1 #ajh ,gulliver's ,travels1 #hb1 #aef ,haeckel1 ,e41 #ab ,halogens1 #cf1 #dj ,harper's ,weekly1 #ic ,helium1 #cg ,herschel1 ,sir ,j41 #ed ---- ,sir ,w41 #bj1 #di1 #ei1 #fj1 #fa ,hevelius1 #ea ,hippalus1 lunar crater1 #eb ,hooke1 ,r41 #ei1 #fj1 #acj ,huyghens1 #ei ,hydrocarbons1 #ch ,hydrogen1 #aa1 #cf1 #cg1 #ch1 #da1 #ha ,inhabitant1 #e ,inhabited ,worlds1 #b1 #c1 #d ,io1 satellite of ,jupiter1 #aca ,iron1 #ab1 #cc1 #cf ,jupiter1 #abb-cb ----1 belts1 #abg1 #abi ----1 great red spot1 #acj ----1 proper motion of spots1 #abi ----1 satellites of1 #abh1 #aca ----1 white spots1 #abh1 #acj ,keeler1 ,j4 ,e41 #abb1 #abe ,kies1 lunar crater1 #eb ,kirchhoff1 #cc ,lacus ,solis1 #ig1 #ih1 #ii ,langley1 ,s4 ,p41 #ee ,lilliputians1 #hb1 #hc ,linne1 lunar crater1 #dh ,lockyer1 ,j4 ,n41 #fj ,lowell1 ,p41 #fe1 #ff1 #fg1 #fi1 #ga1 #ha1 #ig1 #ih1 #ii1 #aja1 #ajc1 #ajd1 #aje1 #ajf1 #ajh1 #aji1 #aaj ,lucifer1 #aaa ,maedler1 #df1 #dh1 #fj1 #ig1 #ih ,maginus1 lunar crater1 #df ,magnesium1 #ab1 #cf ,manganese1 #cc ,mare ,fecunditatis1 #dg ---- ,humerum1 #eb ---- ,nubium1 #eb ---- ,serenitatis1 #dh ,mars1 canals of1 #eg-gj1 #gh1 #aja1 #ajb ----1 conditions of1 #ga-ie ----1 illusions of1 #if-aaj ----1 meteorology of1 #ic-d ----1 oases of1 #fe1 #ih1 #ii1 #aja ----1 thermograph of1 #ia1 #ib ----1 winds of1 #gg ,mendeleeff1 #ci ,mercury1 #aad-ah ,messier1 lunar crater1 #dg1 #dh ,metabolism1 #aj1 #aa1 #ad1 #ae1 #ch ,millechau1 #ajd ,milton1 #ea ,mira ,ceti1 #aej ,molesworth1 ,p4 ,b41 #di1 #ajd ,moon1 #dc-ef ----1 terminator of1 #ea ,mont ,blanc1 #be1 #gd1 #hj ,mount ,everest1 #ge1 #hj ,nature of ,vision1 #ii ,nebulae1 spectrum of1 #ch1 #dj ,nebulium1 #dj ,negative elements1 #cf ,neison1 ,e41 #dh1 #ec ,neptune1 #acb1 #ada ,newcomb1 ,s41 #ic1 #aji ,nicholson1 ,j4 ,w41 #dj ,nickel1 #cc ,nilosyrtis1 canal on ,mars1 #hi ,nitrogen1 #aa1 #cg1 #ch1 #ci ,observatory1 ,chicago1 #dd ----1 ,harvard ,college1 #abg ----1 ,lick1 #abb ----1 ,paris1 #dd ,occultation1 #eb1 #ec ,organic ,life1 definition of1 #ae ,organism1 living1 #f-ai ,organo-genetic elements1 #ab1 #ch1 #ci ,osmosis1 #ae ,oxygen1 #aa1 #cf1 #cg1 #ch1 #da ,periodic ,law1 ,mendeleeff's1 #ci ,phillips1 ,t4 ,e4 ,r41 #ajd ,phosphorus1 #ab ,photosphere1 #bh1 #cc1 #cf ,pickering1 ,w4 ,h41 #dg1 #dh1 #ec1 #aji ,pithecanthropus1 #aee ,planetary statistics1 table of1 #gb1 #gc1 #ace ,platinum1 #cf ,plurality of ,worlds1 #b ,pollock1 ,master1 #aji ,potassium1 #ab ,poynting1 ,j4 ,h41 #hf1 #hg1 #hi1 #aae ,proctor1 ,r4 ,a41 #cd1 #gg ,prominences1 #bi1 #cj1 #cg ,protofluorine1 #dj ,protonilus1 canal on ,mars1 #hi ,protoplasm1 #aa1 #ab1 #ac1 #ae1 #ch1 #dj1 #aed ,pyramid1 ,great1 #de ,refraction1 anomalous1 #bh ,reversing layer1 #cf ,rice-grains1 of ,sun's surface1 #bh1 #bi ,ring ,nebula in ,lyra1 #dj ,rosse1 ,lord1 #ee ,ruskin1 ,j41 #ai ,saturn1 #acb ----1 ,rings of1 #ach ,schiaparelli1 ,g4 ,v41 #fa1 #fb1 #fc1 #fd1 #ff1 #ig1 #ii1 #ajg1 #ajh1 #aaf1 #aag ,schooling1 ,t4 ,holt1 #hc ,scientia1 #ff ,semi-suns1 #aca1 #acb ,serviss1 ,garrett ,p41 #ag ,singapore1 climate of1 #hg1 #hh ,sinus ,sabaeus1 marking on ,mars1 #ig1 #ii ,sirius1 #cg ,sodium1 #cc1 #cf ,solar ,constant1 #bf ,spectroscopic binaries1 #add1 #ade ,spectrum1 #ec ----1 heat1 #ee ,spurious disc1 #ajc ,stars1 double1 #ce ----1 multiple1 #ce ----1 red1 #ch ----1 spectra of1 #cd1 #ch1 #ci ,stefan's ,law1 #he ,stoney1 ,g4 ,johnstone1 #cd ,streaming1 #ae ,sulphur1 #aa1 #ch ,sun1 #bj-cb ,sunspots1 #bi1 #cj1 #ca1 #ch ----1 spectra of1 #cg ,swift1 ,dean1 #hb1 #aef ,table ,mountain1 #ed ,thermograph of ,mars1 #ia1 #ib ,titanium1 #cf1 #cg1 #ch ,tornadoes1 #ca1 #acg ,twinkler1 #aad ,tycho1 lunar crater1 #df ,uranus1 #acb1 #adj ,venus1 #eg1 #aaa-ah ,verworn1 ,max1 #g ,very1 ,f4 ,w41 #ee ,vesper1 #aaa ,victoria1 hypothetical planet1 #hc ,wallace1 ,a4 ,r41 #d ,war of the ,worlds1 #ajd1 #aef ,waste1 #aea1 #aeb ,water1 indispensable factor1 #ae1 #da ,wells1 ,h4 ,g41 #ajd1 #aef ,whewell1 #d ,williams1 ,a4 ,stanley1 #ajd ,wolf1 ,max1 #dj ,young1 ,c4 ,a41 #bf1 #cc ,,william ,,brendon ,,and ,,son1 ,,ltd4 ,,printers1 ,,plymouth ,footnotes3 #a ,chemical ,phenomena in ,life1 pp4 #fb-c1 by ,dr4 ,frederick ,czapek 7,harper's ,library of ,living ,thought74 ,the reader is strongly recommended to study this work in the present connection4 #b ,wonders of ,life1 by ,ernst ,haeckel1 ,professor at ,jena ,university1 p4 #acj4 #c ,wonders of ,life1 pp4 #abg-h4 #d ,chemical ,phenomena in ,life1 p4 #eh4 #e ,ibid41 p4 #bb4 #f ,other ,worlds1 by ,garrett ,p4 ,serviss1 pp4 #fc-d4 #g ,modern ,painters1 by ,john ,ruskin4 #h ,if this experiment could be carried out1 it would be necessary to use a spring balance4 ,if the object were weighed in a pair of scales or by a steelyard1 the counterbalancing weights would be likewise affected in the same proportion1 so that the equilibrium would be undisturbed4 #i ,the movements of not a few double stars point to perturbations caused by the attraction of unseen bodies4 ,there are also a number of instances known of ,eclipse or ,algol-type variable stars1 in which the presence of a dark companion is indicated by the diminution of the light of the star at regular intervals4 #aj ,proc4 ,r4 ,soc41 ,,lxxx1 #ej1 #aijg4 #aa ,nature1 ,,lxxx1 #aeh 7,april #hth1 #aiji74 #ab ,periodic ,changes upon the ,moon1 ,memoirs1 ,british ,astronomical ,association1 ,vol4 ,,xiii1 p4 #hh4 #ac ,the ,moon1 by ,philip ,fauth1 p4 #aef4 #ad ,radiation in the ,solar ,system3 ,its ,effects on ,temperature1 and its ,pressure on ,small ,bodies1 by ,dr4 ,j4 ,h4 ,poynting 7,phil4 ,trans4 of the ,royal ,society1 ,vol4 #bjb ,a74 #ae ,publ4 of the ,astron4 ,soc4 of the ,pacific1 ,vol4 ,,ii1 pp4 #bhf-h4 ,harper's ,library of ,living ,though ,,arthur ,,holmes ,,the ,,age ,,of ,,the ,,earth ,and ,associated ,problems4 ,illustrated ,gives us the result of the latest research into this field of enquiry4 ,the radioactive minerals are shown to be recording their own age with the exquisite accuracy of a chronometer--their records checking physical1 astronomical1 and geological methods of computation4 ,,prof4 ,a4 ,w4 ,,bickerton ,,the ,,birth ,,of ,,worlds ,,and ,,systems ,illustrated ,preface by ,prof4 ,ernest ,rutherford1 ,f4,r4,s4 ,a graphic account of the formation of new stars from the collision of dead suns or other celestial bodies4 ,the theory throws light on many astronomical problems1 and with its conception of an immortal cosmos1 is of great philosophical importance4 ,,prof4 ,,svante ,,arrhenius ,,the ,,life ,,of ,,the ,,universe #b ,vols4 ,illustrated ,we can thoroughly recommend these volumes4 ,the information is accurate1 useful1 and most suggestive4 ,there are many for whom the first chapters of ,genesis are a subtle allegory covering the profoundest truths1 and we are grateful to the author for having set out this mass of facts4--,the ,globe4 ,,sir ,,oliver ,,lodge1 ,f4,r4,s4 ,,the ,,ether ,,of ,,space ,illustrated ,this work by the great physicist will be found to possess an abiding charm and an intellectual stimulation4-,observer4 ,opens up new views into the nature of the universe4 ,precise and lucid1 it summarises our knowledge of the substance which fills all space and penetrates all matter--the substratum of matter itself4--,birmingham ,post4 ,please write for announcements and descriptive list3 ,,harper ,,brothers1 #de ,albemarle ,street1 ,london1 ,w4 ,harper's ,library of ,living ,thought ,foolscap #hvo1 gilt tops1 decorative covers1 richly gilt backs ,per ,volume3 ,cloth #bs4 #f;d4 net4 ,leather #cs4 #f;d4 net4 ,,prof4 ,,arthur ,,keith1 ,m4,d4 7,hunterian ,professor ,royal ,college of ,surgeons7 ,,ancient ,,types ,,of ,,man ,illustrated ,the kind of book that only a master of his subject could write4 ,it must interest every thinking person4--,british ,medical ,journal4 ,,prof4 ,,frederick ,,czapek ,,chemical ,,phenomena ,,in ,,life ,discusses in clear1 concise terms the great question--,can life be explained by physics and chemistry8 ,it deals with the life-processes of plants1 the molecular structure of protoplasm1 organic synthesis in the cell1 the nature of ferments1 and the subject of inheritance4 ,,sir ,a4 ,,tilden1 ,f4,r4,s4 ,,the ,,elements ,speculations as to their ,nature and ,origin ,diagrams1 c4 ,points to the conclusion that the elements resulted from a change in some primal essence1 and discusses whether all may not be suffering a slow waste1 which1 in the long run1 must lead back to the primal chaos4 ,,sir ,,william ,,ramsay1 ,f4,r4,s4 ,,elements ,,and ,,electrons ,diagrams ,the electron--the atom of electricity--is shown to be separable from matter1 and to be capable under certain circumstances of independent existence4 ,the book shows that the electron must be regarded as a kind of element itself1 with much stronger claims to elementary or undecomposable characters than the bodies hitherto ranked as elements4 ,transcriber's ,notes3 ,passages in italics are indicated by italics4 ,superscripted characters are indicated by superscript4 ,the original text includes symbols which are represented by ,symbol in this text version4