,libr>ies47 ,an ,outl9e ( ,sexual ,morality ,an ,outl9e ( ,sexual ,morality ,k5ne? ,+ram ,! ,introduction by ,f4 ,w4 ,w4 ,griff91 ,m4,a41 ,m4,d41 ,m4,r4,c4,s41 ,l4,r4,c4,p4 ,jona?an ,cape ,elev5 ,g[] ,/reet1 ,london ,fir/ publi%$ #aibb ,all ,rights res]v$ ,au?or's ,note ,i am anxi\s to take ?is opportunity ( ?ank+ ^? fri5ds :o h help$ me by valuable sugge/ion & criticism 9 correct+ ! pro(s ( ?is small book4 ,9 p>ticul> ,i desire to m5tion ,canon ,lacey & ,dr4 ,griff91 & to apologize = ! am\nt ( "t :i* ,i mu/ h /ol5 f !m4 ,,k5ne? ,,+ram ,m>* #aibb ,introduction ,any hone/ inquiry into ! ,primal ,in/9cts ( humanity w necess>ily lead to a cle>] und]/&+ ( _! nature1 _! functions1 & _! pot5tialities1 & s w help to pave ! way = ! appe>ance ( a heal?i] & happi] race ( m54 ,! dictum ,le>n to "k y\rself1 inscrib$ on ! ,temple ( ,apollo at ,delphi1 has nev] be5 ( m vital importance1 bo? individually & nationally1 ?an x is to-day1 & ! v>i\s s*ools ( mod]n psy*ological ?\ght1 :i* are /eadily op5+ up ^? hi!rto sc>cely explor$ regions :5ce fl[ ! spr+s ( human actions1 are gradually cle>+ away ! ignorance :i* has be5 ! real cause ( s mu* disease & di/ress4 ,! foll[+ *apt]s are to be welcom$ p>ticul>ly z an ef=t at ! con/ructional re=m ( our treatm5t ( "o ( our deepe/ & mo/ p[]ful in/9cts4 ,ev5 ^? :o d n necess>ily give ass5t to all ! details 9 ! l9e ( argum5t !re9 pursu$ mu/ surely approve ! insi/5ce ^u ! vital necessity ( !re be+ love 9 all sex relation%ips4 ,! ^w sexual1 ?\gh indisp5sable p]haps 9 su* a book z ?is1 inv>iably induces "s measure ( opposition by reason ( ! associations :i* x calls up1 & s is (t5 replac$ by ! cognate adjective racial1 :i* emphasizes ! wid] aims ( ,race ,pres]vation r ?an ! n>r[] matt] ( ! reproduction ( individuals4 ,x is n a matt] ( cur+ individual immorality1 n ev5 ( expla9+ x only1 x is ! great] matt] ( lay+ a s\nd f\ndation = a practicable social morality t is ! object ( consid]ation "h4 ,x is important t any su* opposition %\ld be nei!r hypocritical nor hyp]-critical1 = great national issues are at /ake4 ,)\t ! heal?y m9d !re c be no heal?y body1 at any rate f ! po9t ( view ( ! community1 & ?us su* a sci5tific inquiry z is set =? 9 ^! pages is def9itely lead+ t[>ds ! production ( a heal?i] nation4 ,! necessity ( !re be+ e/abli%$ a balance betwe5 an unlimit$ self-expression & a rigid self-repression is cle>ly indicat$ also1 & ! importance ( self-control is n ignor$ "h z x has be5 else:]e1 un=tunately1 bo? z reg>ds ! individual's physical heal? & ! weal ( ! community at l>ge2 = self-control is a vital ess5tial 9 ! heal? ( a man j z x is a vital necessity = ! cont9uance ( a nation4 ,! foll[+ pages conta9 in=mation & sugge/ions :i* %\ld t5d to ! =mation ( a wis] & m hopeful outlook ov] ! problems ( sexual morality1 & %\ld !re=e receive ! c>eful consid]ation ( all :o h ! int]e/s ( humanity at he>t4 ,f4 ,w4 ,w4 ,,griff9 ,m4,a41 ,m4,d41 ,m4,r4,c4,s41 ,l4,r4,c4,p4 ,m>* #aibb ,cont5ts ,,*apt] ,,page #a4 ,,apologia #g #b4 ,,(ficial ,,attitudes ,,t[>ds ,,sex #ac #c4 ,,! ,,g5]al ,,pr9ciples ,,( ,,purity #bc #d4 ,,celibacy #ca #e4 ,,non-,,celibacy #cf #f4 ,,divorce #de #g4 ,,eug5ics ,,& ,,pro/itution #eb #h4 ,,! ,,homosexual ,,temp]am5t #fj #i4 ,,! ,,sexless ,,class #gf #aj4 ,,sup]-,,abnormalities #gh #aa4 ,,sex ,,education #hg ,an ,outl9e ( ,sexual ,morality ,*apt] #a3 ,apologia ,i h be5 impell$ to attempt ?is def9ition ( sexual morality = at lea/ ?ree reasons4 ,! fir/ is t1 at ?is mom5t p>ticul>ly1 sci5ce is emphasiz+ ! l>ge responsibility :i* sex assumes 9 our lives4 ,we may ?9k t ,freud has ov]e/imat$ ?is influ5ce2 nev]!less1 all psy*o-analysis t5ds to %[ t ! sex-=ce _c be :olly repress$ & t ev5 ) ! mo/ passionless individuals sex is ! unconsci\s motive 9 a l>ge p]c5tage ( _! activities4 ,x is well !re=e t we %\ld h z cle> a conception z possible z to ! moral rights ( ?is enorm\s factor 9 our lives4 ,secondly1 a h&book ( ?is k9d is p]haps ! mo/ conv5i5t m$ium = def9+ my p]sonal attitude t[>ds ?is problem4 ,my own views are1 ( c\rse1 unimportant1 b x s happ5s t ,i h (t5 be5 ask$1 9 private conv]sations1 to def9e !m4 ,n[ to summ>ize !m to ! ext5t :i* a casual conv]sation mu/ almo/ necess>ily entail1 is difficult2 & (t51 ,i suspect1 ,i may h giv5 a :olly wrong impression4 ,i am anxi\s to set t "r4 ,b my *ief reason is ! *aos ( public op9ion on ?is "q4 ,"o is cont9ually hav+ ?is fact =c$ on "o4 ,l>gely ?is is ! result ( transition & reaction4 ,9 ,engl&1 ! c\ntry to :i* ,i %all almo/ entirely conf9e myself1 we h be5 enorm\sly affect$ by t pres5tation ( religion :i* has be5 call$ ,puritanism4 ,we h be5 /eep$ 9 ! !ology ( ,milton4 ,all =ms ( religion--,ca?olic z well z ,prote/ant--h be5 comp>atively infect$4 ,:5 we speak ( ! religi\s attitude t[>ds any "q1 we f9d ourselves irresi/ibly consid]+ ! ,puritan attitude4 ,x is n1 ,i ?9k1 unfair to def9e ! influ5ce ( ,puritanism z a t5d5cy to reg>d all amusem5t ) disfav\r4 ,! orig9al ,puritans 7 notori\sly d\r 9 _! mann] & _! dress4 ,x has be5 said t !y attack$ ! sport ( be>-bait+1 because x gave pleasure to ! onlook]s1 & n because x 0 pa9ful to ! be>s4 ,sunday1 on :i* ! outw>d obs]vance ( religion 0 necess>ily conc5trat$1 became a day ( complete ab/5tion f worldly recreation4 ,puritanism might supply spiritual comp5sation1 b any?+ :i* gave pleasure to ! s5ses 0 ess5tially evil4 ,?us art & beauty 7 bani%$ f religi\s s]vices & sacr$ build+s4 ,n only 0 ! /age an entrance to hell1 b a consi/5t ,puritan l ,bunyan pray$ ,god to =give him ! s9 ( hav+ play$ a game ( hockey4 ,puritanism _h rea*$ its z5i?1 n ( int5sity b ( univ]sality1 by ! latt] half ( ! la/ c5tury4 ,^? ( u :o are old en\gh to h be5 ,victorians 7 br\ght up on comp>ative doses ( ! ,puritan m$ic9e4 ,especially among ! middle-classes ! hi/ory ( e ,engli% family f ! eighties till ! ,w> is extraord9>ily simil>2 x consi/s ( a s]ies ( emancipations4 ,our gr&p>5ts 7 almo/ entirely ,puritan 9 _! mann] ( liv+1 our p>5ts _h compromis$ & extricat$ !mselves to "s degree1 & our *ildr5 h become almo/ :olly free4 ,h[ _m ( u realize t up to ! sev5ties x 0 q improp] = a lady to ride on ! top ( an omnibus8 ,9 no in/ance 0 ! effect ( ,puritanism /rong] ?an on sex4 ,= sex is pre-em95tly inspir$ by a desire = pleasure1 :e!r x be spiritual1 emotional1 or c>nal4 ,on ?is score alone x w\ld h be5 m>k$ out z a deadly evil4 ,b !re 0 a fur!r indictm5t 9 ! ,puritan cre$4 ,accord+ to ! ,miltonian int]pretation ,p>adise _h be5 lo/ on acc\nt ( ! sex impulse2 orig9al s9 0 no?+ m or less ?an ! s5se ( sex--! loss ( sexual ignorance4 ,accord+ly ! :ole sex-nature 0 reg>d$ z evil1 & sex g5]ally became a taboo1 a clos$ subject to :i* no ref]5ce c\ld be made4 ,victorian ,puritanism (t51 inde$1 sugge/s ! o/ri* bury+ 8 head 9 ! s&--! attempt to rem$y evil by pret5d+ t x does n exi/4 ,! effect ( ,puritanism on ! ,victorian 0 precisely ?is con=mity ( outw>d behavi\r4 ,x assum$ t all m5 & wom5 7 innoc5t1 & t1 except 9 m>riage1 sex play$ no "p 9 life4 ,x pret5d$ !y 7 innoc5t1 & x made !m only respectable4 ,p>5ts w\ld (t5 refra91 on ! plea t innoc5ce mu/ n be di/urb$1 f tea*+ _! *ildr5 any?+ ab\t sex4 ,s impure & evil a subject mu/ n be ref]r$ to4 ,su* unpleasant problems z v5]eal disease mu/ be hidd5 out ( sight1 al?\gh pro/itution & v5]eal disease cont9ue to fl\ri%4 ,! ,victorian1 9 fact1 c>ri$ out ! ,puritan doctr9e t all sex is evil1 by outw>dly pret5d+ t1 unless m>ri$1 he possess$ no sexual in/9ct4 ,actually he 0 no m incl9$ to ab/5tion ?an any o!r human g5]ation has be54 ,inde$1 we d n f9d any evid5ce t ,puritanism succe$s 9 c>ry+ its anti-sex !ories into practice4 ,9 ,s\? ,wales1 = example1 :]e ,puritanism has e/abli%$ a p>ticul> /ronghold1 sexual laxity is peculi>ly m>k$4 ,! reaction f ,puritanism1 especially 9 reg>d to sex1 has be5 precipitat$ & exagg]at$ by ! ,great ,w>4 ,we h !re=e 9 mod]n society two oppos+ policies4 ,among ^? :o h ?r[n ov] all religi\s obs]vance & h fre$ !mselves entirely f ,puritanism1 !re seems to be a complete abs5ce ( any moral sex-/&>d4 ,we c appreciate t impasse if we consid] ! inability ( ! sex-novel or play to sugge/ any =m ( conduct :i* is immoral4 ,^? :o /ill adh]e to organiz$ religion cont9ue to look at sex l>gely ?r\gh ,puritan spectacles4 ,! fall5 woman or ! convict$ cl]gyman is g5u9ely reg>d$ z be+ guilty ( ! mo/ damn+ ( all (f5ces4 ,! sexual laxity ( ! neo-,georgian is us$ z a conv9c+ argum5t t once ! ,puritan view is ab&on$1 complete an>*y is ! only alt]native4 ,religi\s tea*]s cont9ue to prea* :at _m ( !m w\ld d5y to be ,puritan doctr9e1 b :at ,i hope to prove belongs peculi>ly to t aspect ( ,*ri/ianity4 ,& mean:ile ! non-religi\s _w pron\nces ! opposite extreme4 ,x is because ,i believe bo? ^! attitudes to conta9 error1 t ,i am anxi\s to contribute ! f\ndation = "s pr9ciple 9 ! curr5t deadlock4 ,*apt] #b3 ,(ficial ,attitudes t[>ds ,sex ,x w n[ be conv5i5t to def9e ! *ief collective or (ficial attitudes t[>ds sex4 ,9 a m]e outl9e su* z ?is h&book pr(esses to be1 we may divide ^! attitudes into ?ree1 & label !m ! popul> attitude1 ! legal or ,/ate attitude1 & ! religi\s attitude4 ,) ! popul> attitude we h already l>gely dealt4 ,x is /ill 9 a transitory1 confus$ /ate1 m]g+ at "o end into ! old ,puritan extreme1 & at ! o!r to m]e negativism1 m]e opposition to ,puritan asceticism1 & )\t ev5 an attempt to recon/ruct a moral /&>d4 ,?is p]haps is an inevitable /age 9 any transition2 b x is none ! less unsatisfactory4 ,man _c succe$ )\t a /&>d2 & moreov] we "k intuitively t all ?+s are n morally p]missible4 ,if !re is purity & beauty & div9ity 9 life1 !re mu/ be impurity & s94 ,w x be consid]$ an exagg]ation if ,i say t x is almo/ bett] to h a ,puritan /&>d ?an none at all8 ,! ,r\ndhead at lea/ 0 m ?an a mat* = ! ,cavali] because he _h a positive inspiration4 ,b !re is "o common feature 9 ?is *aos ( evolv+ popul> op9ion4 ,! vulg> m9d t5ds to measure morality by :at is usual4 ,! s9s :i* mo/ m5 commit are reg>d$ z h>dly evil2 ! acts :i* may n be evil1 are reg>d$ z s9s if !y are peculi>4 ,?us an occasional lapse f cont95cy on ! "p ( a "y man is popul>ly reg>d$ z n v repreh5sible1 :]eas ! p]petrator ( "s weird act ( be/iality w\ld be h\nd$ to prison4 ,! flaw 9 ?is e/imate is n only t ! normal /&>d v>ies 9 race & age1 b t !re is no s+le human sex nature2 !re are inf9ite v>ieties4 ,to condemn v>iety p] se is1 z we %all pres5tly obs]ve1 a contradiction ( ! laws ( nature4 ,! gradual emancipation ( society f ! taboo on sex 9 conv]sation is an und\bt$ ga94 ,we owe su* m5 z ,b]n>d ,%aw a debt ( gratitude = ! way 9 :i* !y h =c$ sex ref]5ce into ! play1 & !re=e on public notice4 ,b if ?is is to result 9 elim9at+ sex mode/y x is creat+ evils great] ?an ^? :i* x seeks to remove4 ,i w n "h emb>k ^u a consid]ation ( su* a !ory z t :i* has be5 int]e/+ly prop\nd$ by ,mr4 ,we/]m>ck1 namely t !re is a relation%ip betwe5 sexual mode/y & ! feel+ aga9/ ince/4#a ,i w only insi/ t mode/y is natural 9 all qualities :i* we reg>d z sacr$4 ,if we are mode/ ab\t sex 9 our conv]sation to ! ext5t ( plac+ a taboo on sex1 & all[+ sexual problems to rema9 unsolv$1 or 9 lett+ our *ildr5 confuse innoc5ce ) ignorance1 we are on indef5sible gr\nd2 indef5sible1 ,i ?9k1 because our mode/y is bas$ on ! ,puritan doctr9e t sex is at he>t an unclean ?+4 ,i wi% especially to def5d mode/y because sex is s clean4 ,we d n want to vulg>ize by public ref]5ce our mo/ spiritual exp]i5ces1 our s5se ( love1 our feel+ ( exaltation 9 ! pres5ce ( :at is beautiful & div9e4 ,we speak ( ^! ?+s only at m sacr$ mom5ts1 if at all4 ,we mu/ be c>eful1 too1 le/ 9 a reaction f taboo we all[ sci5ce to rob sex ( its romantic & div9e "*4 ,we h c>efully to pres]ve ! c5tre ( gravitation betwe5 two extremes4 ,we %\ld look askance at a man :o collect$ 9 a glass bottle1 & analys$1 8 "m's te>s4 ,9 ?is connexion x may be well to call att5tion to ! inconsi/5cy ( ! male 9 mak+ ! sex-act a subject = hum\r4 ,:atev] our religi\s belief1 we "k t ! sex-act is ! means ( procreation1 & is1 = ?is reason alone1 a sacr$ function4 ,x seems inconsi/5t1 !re=e1 t we %\ld s p]si/5tly treat x z a m>k = ridicule4 99 99 99 99 99 ,! second g5]al attitude is t ( ! ,/ate1 or legislature4 ,"h we f9d ourselves 9 ! pres5ce ( a consi/5t motive4 ,! ,/ate is conc]n$ only ) ! pres]vation ( ! bir?-rate2 any sex behavi\r :i* defeats ?is object x reg>ds z immoral & puni%able4 ,! ,/ate _c int]f]e s f> ) individual privacy z to puni% ma/urbation or artificial means ( re/ra9t2 b x does g to ! ext5t ( puni%+ unnatural acts betwe5 husb& & wife1#b & 9 ,am]ica1 ! ,/ate has ev5 p5aliz$ ! activities ( ! neo-,mal?usian propag&a4 ,all sex abnormalities are rigidly puni%$1 :]eas ! procreation ( *ildr5 outside w$lock is n a legal (f5ce4#c ,?is is a consi/5t attitude1 b x sugge/s "o s]i\s flaw4 ,:atev] may h be5 ! case 9 e>ly days :5 an increase ( population 0 ess5tial1 !re c be little d\bt t to-day t necessity has dim9i%$4 ,inde$1 )\t ent]+ into ! ,mal?usian controv]sy1 x is almo/ impossible to d5y t at ! mom5t we are suff]+ l>gely f ov]-population4 ,consequ5tly1 :atev] opportuni/ policy may dictate1 we _c poise our e/imate ( morality on s %ift+ a basis z ! ne$s ( population4 ,in/9ctively we _c associate morality 9 any?+ ) ! legal attitude4 ,!re are _m acts ev5 outside ! sex sph]e :i* mo/ ( u w\ld consid] immoral1 b :i* are unpuni%$ by law1 & o!rs :i* are illegal b are n immoral2 x is immoral to lie1 b unless we lie on oa? !re is no ,/ate (f5ce2 x is puni%able to ride a bicycle )\t lights aft] d>k1 b we are consci\s ( no moral del9qu5cy 9 s do+4 99 99 99 99 99 ,! ?ird attitude is t ( religion4 ,we h already discuss$ ! ,puritan attitude & ! mann] 9 :i* x has p]meat$ our unconsci\s religi\s ?\ght4 ,9 ! ,anglican m>riage-s]vice !re appe>s at fir/ sight to be "s endorsem5t ( ! !ory t ! sex-act is unclean & is only p]mitt$ 9 m>riage z a concession to human weakness4#d ,?is doctr9e owes its d]ivation to ,/4 ,paul1 al?\gh x is important to notice t ,/4 ,paul specially emphasizes t he is n speak+ ex-ca!dra3 ,i say !re=e to ! unm>ri$ & wid[s x is good = !m to rema9 ev5 z ,i4 ,b if !y _c conta91 let !m m>ry2 = x is bett] to m>ry ?an to burn4#e ,^! words w probably be us$ z an argum5t aga9/ ! /atem5t t x is a specifically ,puritan doctr9e to reg>d ! sex-act z unclean4 ,x w be urg$ t ! e>ly ,*ri/ian ,*ur*1 z %[n by ! writ+s ( ! ,fa!rs1 disc\rag$ m>riage & upheld celibacy z ! ideal4 ,i hope1 9 a mom5t1 to diff]5tiate betwe5 ! ,ca?olic & ! ,puritan doctr9e4 ,b m imm$iately we w consid] :at ,i h broadly def9$ z ! ,puritan attitude4 ,! flaw 9 ! argum5t t ! sex-act is by nature unclean & mu/ be suppress$1 ev5 ?\gh 9 m>riage x may be legitimiz$1 is t x is ! orda9$ means ( procreation4 ,fur!r ?an ?is1 we h ! inevitable fact to face t ! sex-in/9ct 9 normal p]sons is s /rong t x c only ) great difficulty be suppress$1 & !n results 9 an outfl[ ( sex activity 9 :at we usually "k z non-sexual *annels4 ,(t5 ?is suppression w f9d its v5t 9 m5tal dislocation & g5]al n]v\s irritability4 ,b )\t analys+ ^! complex symptoms1 x is suffici5t to ask ^? :o admit ! control ( ,god1 :y ,god creat$ ! sex impulse 9 ord] t x %\ld be oblit]at$4 ,directly we move away f ?is /rict doctr9e to ! modifi$ popul> expression ( x1 we f9d t ! position is becom+ m intelligible b less logical4 ,x is consi/5t to reg>d all sex z evil4 ,b :5 ! av]age ,*ri/ian1 :ile d5\nc+ adult]y z a s91 insi/s on copulation 9 m>riage z its consummation1 a difficulty arises :i* mu/ n be ignor$4 ,"h1 9 adult]y1 is a s9 :i* is s s]i\s 9 ! eyes ( ,*ri/ian m51 t x c nev] be r$eem$2 ! /igma ( impurity rema9s = ev] on ! (f5d]4 ,yet ?is same act1 if only committ$ "u ! regulation ( m>riage becomes n m]ely some?+ p]missible1 b ! ess5tial act ( consummation1 ! div9e me?od ( procreation4 ,"o c und]/& h[ an act1 good 9 itself1 c become a s9 because x is p]=m$ "u imp]missible circum/ances4 ,b x is difficult to conceive ( an act *ang+ its integral nature1 s t at "o mom5t x is a necess>y virtue1 & at ano!r ! base/ vice4 ,x is1 = in/ance1 legal = a soldi] to kill an enemy 9 battle1 :ile x is a crime = "o civilian to kill ano!r2 b ! act ( kill+ is p] se an evil ?+1 ev5 9 ! case ( a soldi]4 ,x nev] becomes s exalt$ z is ! sex-act 9 m>riage4 ,! ,ca?olic doctr9e1 h[ev]1 :ile at fir/ sight x appe>s to be id5tical ) ! ,puritan1 is actually q di/9ct4 ,= "o ?+ !re is a diff]5ce ( attitude t[>ds s94 ,puritanism seems to sugge/ t ^? :o h be5 conv]t$ are actually p]fect4 ,x insi/s t !y %all keep up ?is outw>d appe>ance1 & consequ5tly ensures t _! s9s mu/ be committ$ secretly4 ,!y are !n suffici5tly p]fect to asc5d1 aft] dea?1 direct to ,heav54 ,ca?olicism1 h[ev]1 is cont9ually recogniz+ t man is normally a s9n]2 ! confessional is a public recognition ( ?is fact4 ,ca?olicism !re=e approa*es ! "q ( sex ) ! expectation t man w s91 t ! probability ( 8 fall is s great z to make x unnecess>y & undesirable to hide all traces ( 8 s9 f public view4 ,! ,puritan attitude t[>ds sex is really t ( ! prude4 ,! ,ca?olic ,*ur* is s ready to talk ab\t sex 9 a dec5t mann] t %e provides ! confessional z a p]man5t in/itution4 ,:5 we turn to ! ,ca?olic attitude t[>ds sex we are fac$ inde$ ) two significant dogmas :i* make up a position fundam5tally di/9ct f t ( ,puritanism4 ,! fir/ ( ^! is ! doctr9e t m>riage is a sacram5t1 & ! second t ! esse ( ! m>riage is ! cons5t ( ! p>ties4 ,! significance ( ! fir/ is t m>riage is n m]ely a lic5ce :]eby an unclean act is p]mitt$ z a sop to human weakness4 ,! sex function1 z ! integral "p ( m>riage1 is ackn[l$g$ to be an actual objective ( div9e grace4 ,! significance ( ! second doctr9e is t :]ev] two p eligible to give cons5t1 give x1 !re is ! ess5ce ( m>riage4 ,few non-,ca?olics realize t ?\gh ! ,*ur* normally requires ! ecclesia/ical & civil regulations to be obs]v$1 %e does n pr(ess to m>ry ! two p]sons2 %e m]ely pron\nces a bless+ on _! m>riage4 ,%e may make conditions be=e %e w give h] bless+ or ev5 h] witness to ! validity ( ! m>riage2 b %e recognizes t a m>riage may be j z valid on a des]t isl& z 9 a ca!dral4#f ,& h5ce %e really reg>ds adult]y1 n z does ! ,puritan1 b z an act :i* %\ld be sacram5tal b has be5 pro/itut$ by ! abs5ce ( ! love-motive1 or by becom+ promiscu\s r ?an con/ant4 ,sexual union may ev5 itself be ( ! nature ( a m>riage1 & x is significant t ! ,*ur* has always insi/$ on ! "r ( p>5ts subsequ5tly to legitimize *ildr5 born out ( w$lock2 x is ! ,engli% law :i* has =bidd5 t privilege4 ,?is is ! (ficial ,ca?olic doctr9e1 h[ev] mu* x has be5 assimilat$ to ! ,puritan conception by ! p]sonnel ( ! ,*ur*4 ,yet ! ,*ur* has consi/5tly upheld ! celibate life z ! high] vocation4 ,%e has repres5t$ a celibate prie/hood z a great] ideal ?an a m>ri$ prie/hood4 ,%e has exalt$ ,our ,lady z a ,virg94 ,%e has insi/$ on ! ,virg9 ,bir?4 ,b %e has done ?is1 n because sex is evil1 b because celibacy is bett]4 ,&1 z we %all see1 religi\s celibacy is entirely di/9ct f a condition 9 :i* ! sex impulse is m]ely repress$4 ,*apt] #c3 ,! ,g5]al ,pr9ciples ( ,purity ,9 attempt+ to def9e ^! pr9ciples ,i h no desire to ent] into a controv]sy ( relatives & absolutes4 ,x is suffici5t to meet ^? :o d5y t !re c be any ab/ract /&>d ( purity by po9t+ out t we "k ! direction 9 :i* to look = :at is good & pure4 ,j z we "k t c]ta9 acts are less wor?y ?an o!rs1 s we are aw>e ( ! g5]al direction ( ! nobl] activities4 ,! fir/ pr9ciple to be obs]v$ is t relatively purity is comp>ative4 ,?is is a commonplace ( all p]sonal e/imates4 ,h[ev] mu* we may adh]e to ! conception ( a moral /&>d1 :i* is ab/ract & unv>y+1 we realize t !re are also p]sonal /&>ds :i* v>y v mu*4 ,we d n1 = in/ance1 consid] a cat to be guilty ( murd] :5 %e kills a bird2 we d n execute h] z we execute m5 :o h tak5 human life4 ,we d n ev5 condemn lions or tig]s z homicidal crim9als1 ?\gh we may kill !m 9 self-def5ce1 ?us %[+ t x is n ! di/9ction betwe5 tak+ animal & human life :i* con/itutes ! crime2 x is ! diff]5ce betwe5 ! kill]s4 ,nor is x true t we draw a di/9ction m]ely betwe5 animal & human responsibility1 = ev5 9 ! human k+dom we apply a comp>ative moral /&>d2 we d n consid] a savage :o /eals or kills z be+ guilty to ! ext5t :i* a civiliz$ ,european w\ld be :o p]=m$ a simil> act4 ,we are 9 fact con/antly apply+ a comp>ative /&>d to ! comp>ative intellig5ces ( individuals1 & q rightly1 = all intellig5ce & moral s5se is grad$ f brute-bea/ to savage-man & upw>ds4 ,we mu/ be c>eful n to avoid ?is /&>d ( comp>ative values 9 approa*+ sex morality4 ,s long z we admit t at lea/ !re are acts & pr9ciples :i*1 tak5 9 ! ab/ract1 approa* purity m ne>ly ?an o!rs1 we mu/ n judge all individuals by ! same /&>d4 ,we mu/ n consid] a v ord9>y1 un9tellig5t1 animal-blood$ "y man z be+ excessively s9ful = hav+ a vivid sex exp]i5ce2 p]haps he is liv+ "r up to ! level ( 8 imp]fect /&>d4 ,we mu/ n expect p to be m moral ?an !y c be1 ?\gh x is ! duty ( ,*ur* & religion to educate !m to see t !re are bett] /&>ds4 ,! second pr9ciple is simple1 b ( ! deepe/ importance4 ,x consi/s ( ! proposition t v>iety & n uni=mity is ! fundam5tal rule ( nature1 or1 z ,*ri/ians w\ld hold1 ! int5tion ( ,god4 ,i _c recall any di/9ctive attribute to :i* ?is rule does n apply4 ,!re are an inf9ite species ( creatures1 & inf9ite ta/es & t5d5cies4 ,ev5 if we n>r[ d[n our field ( inve/igation to "o nation or ev5 a s+le family1 we f9d t ea* individual is approa*+ life by diff]5t byways1 ) diff]5t prejudices & diff]5t temp]am5ts & diff]5t conceptions4 ,b ?r\gh\t hi/ory ! majority ( ! normal type has be5 incl9$ to fl\t ?is div9e pr9ciple4 ,! ,puritans1 = example1 7 a p>ticul> type :o did n l ! gay] life ( ! _w1 & pref]r$ a /]n evangelical atmosph]e4 ,consequ5tly !y reg>d$ ^? amusem5ts = :i* !y happ5$ to possess no p>tiality1 z evil1 & :5ev] !y _h ! opportunity !y suppress$ !m2 !y elim9at$ ,*ri/mas & ! m9ce-pie4 ,equally we c see t if ! normal me*anical ,teutonic type _h said t x 0 unnatural = m5 to be arti/ic & _h suppress$ ! arts1 x w\ld h be5 a disa/] = ! _w4 ,!re is n "o vocation1 b !re are _m vocations2 all types are ! design ( int5tion1 & are !re1 n to be suppress$1 b to c>ry out _! p>ticul> mission4 ,?is aga91 is equally true ( sex1 & we mu/ apply ! same conclusions t[>ds ! _m types :i* we %all pres5tly meet1 abnormal z well z normal4 ,! ,prote/ant1 = example1 really ackn[l$ges a uni=m sex-nature only4 ,y w cont9ually he> a ,prote/ant decl>+ t x is unnatural = a man to be a celibate3 ?is is1 ( c\rse1 pure nons5se4 ,x might be unnatural = a normal sex-nature to rema9 celibate1 j z x w\ld be unnatural = a natural celibate to m>ry4 ,! ,ca?olic ,*ur* has be5 f> wis]4 ,%e c (f] ! ,religi\s ,life to ! celibate & ! ,sacram5t ( ,m>riage to ! non-celibate4 ,!re are few types ( individual m un9tellig5t ?an t :i*1 :ile x _c s int]f]e ) p]sonal lib]ty z to compel m>riage1 p]si/s 9 utt]+ ! conv5tion t e man ought to d 8 duty to ! ,/ate4 ,! truism is true2 :at is wrong is ! failure to conceive t !re is no uni=m duty = e man4 ,b ! ?ird pr9ciple is m complex 9 "*1 or1 r1 9 ! consid]ations :i* x involves4 ,x consi/s1 really1 ( a re-affirmation z to ! ,ca?olic condemnation ( ! h]esy ( ,mani*aeism4 ,! ,puritan & ! type he has evolv$ d radically reg>d ! physical z evil4 ,prote/antism1 until x became adult]at$ by ! ,ca?olic movem5t1 elim9at$ z f> z possible1 ! physical m$ium 9 religi\s wor%ip4 ,n only doctr9ally1 b liturgically1 9 ! ab&onm5t ( ritual & arti/ic atmosph]e1 x attempt$ to limit religion z f> z possible to ! spiritual level1 & x reg>d$ sacram5talism z evil because sacram5talism involves an outw>d physical sign4 ,9 ! same way ! av]age ,engli%man1 :o has be5 inculcat$1 f> m ?an he realizes1 ) ,calv9i/ dogma1 reg>ds sex z immoral only :5 x is physical4 ,a man may indulge 9 sexual emotion & ?\ght1 b s long z he suppresses any physical act he is n guilty2 if ?is c be reg>d$ z an exagg]ation x is c]ta9ly true t popul> ,prote/ant !ology reg>ds a man z m immoral if he commits ! physical sex-act ?an if he ?9ks ( x4 ,x is /range to note h[ f> ?is !ory has dep>t$ f ! tea*+ ( ,*ri/1 ,:o decl>$ t he t lu/e? aga9/ a woman ha? committ$ adult]y aga9/ h] 9 8 he>t4 ,x is obvi\s ! mom5t we exam9e ?is conception t x is utt]ly indef5sible4 ,if ! sex-act is evil#g because x is physical1 !n x is equally evil to eat or dr9k4 ,& if an attempt is made to avoid ?is difficulty by say+ t x is evil to debase love by express+ x 9 a physical act1 or t x is bett] to love spiritually & non-physically1 !n x is equally evil to debase arti/ic inspiration by express+ x ) pa9ts on a physical canvas1 or bett] to all[ melodies to float 9 "o's m9d ?an to r$uce !m to ! level ( a physical composition4 ,)\t ent]+ into a highly involv$ philosophy & !re=e at ! risk ( app>5t dogmatism1 ,i wi% n[ to emphasize t !re are c]ta9 asc5d+ levels1 ) :i* man is conc]n$4 ,we may conf9e ourselves to ! physical1 ! emotional1 ! m5tal1 & ! spiritual levels4 ,! physical level is ! l[e/1 9 s f> z man functions !re 9 common ) ! animal4 ,he is m active emotionally ?an ! animal4 ,b :at di/+ui%es him *iefly f ! animal1 & makes him ma/] ov] all brute-creation1 is 8 activity on ! m5tal level4 ,physically he is less p[]ful ?an ! elephant2 b because he c function m5tally & ! elephant c d s h>dly at all1 he c employ ! elephant z a bea/ ( lab\r4 ,"h !n we h a di/9ct gradation1 a gradation :i* cont9ues to apply )9 ! human k+dom & makes u able to di/+ui% a civilis$ man f a savage4 ,we %\ld !re=e apply ?is pr9ciple to sex4 ,sex activity is m pure or impure accord+ to ! level on :i* x *iefly functions4 ,a man :o traffics ) pro/itutes is n immoral because he is function+ physically1 b because he is function+ almo/ entirely on ! physical level4 ,purity is really sex emphasis on ! highe/ levels4 ,ideally ! physically sex-act %\ld !re=e be a m]e expression ( spiritual1 m5tal1 emotional love2 x %\ld j happ54 ,! mom5t "o beg9s to lay ! emphasis on ! l[] levels1 ! m "o becomes correspond+ly less pure4 ,lu/1 9 fact1 is ! desire only = physical sex exp]i5ce--! wrong proportion & balance4 ,a man's /age ( moral developm5t is to be discov]$ by ! p>ticul> level on :i* he is mo/ active4 ,we mu/ n avoid ! consequ5ce ( ?is pr9ciple4 ,we mu/ be prep>$ to admit z relatively moral1 behavi\r :i* popul> philosophy might reg>d z immoral4 ,we mu/ also be prep>$ to reg>d z immoral _m m>riages 9 :i* ! physical is ! *ief inc5tive4 ,! l[e/ /age ( impurity w\ld seem to be rea*$ 9 cases1 :e!r betwe5 man & h>lot1 or husb& & wife1 :]e ! physical function is s emphasiz$ t artificial physical aids are invok$ 9 ord] to excite ! physical passions & make !m ! cause in/ead ( ! result ( sex emotion & ?\ght4 ,*apt] #d3 ,celibacy ,if once ! ?ird pr9ciple nam$ 9 ! prec$+ *apt] is fully appreciat$1 we h already laid ! f\ndation ( our moral /&>d4 ,we %all h se5 t physical expression is ! sacram5tal =m ( ! invisible & sup]-physical motive1 & t immorality is ! %ift+ ( emphasis f high] to l[] levels4 ,we %all be 9 possession ( a te/ by :i* we may 9 almo/ all sex problems det]m9e a comp>ative virtue or evil ( any practice or conduct4 ,n[ ?is involves ! equally fundam5tal !ory t sex is n entirely a physical activity4 ,9 ! popul> conception sex is always confus$ ) physical sex expression4 ,b ?is conception1 ,i submit1 is entirely inaccurate4 ,ev5 ?\gh ,freud may be ju/ifiably criticis$ = /ra9+ ! ^w sex to include _m =ces :i* d n directly t5d to incite physical sex activity1 he has successfully %[n t sex is ! motive beh9d emotions & conduct :i* w\ld n popul>ly be t]m$ sexual at all4 ,a musician may1 = example1 be draw+ on 8 sex-en]gy 9 compos+ or p]=m+ musical works2 a humanit>ian may be sexual 9 8 diffus$ love ( fell[-m5 & wom54 ,we _c possibly draw a l9e & say t "h sex beg9s & !re x ends4 ,we c only admit t x c>ries f> beyond ^? p>ticul> physical manife/ations :i* we popul>ly associate ) sex4 ,if we accept ! pr9ciple ( asc5d+ levels ( physical1 emotional1 m5tal1 & spiritual functions1 we %\ld expect to f9d t sex makes its appe>ance 9 m ?an "o =m4 ,we "k1 t is to say1 t !re are1 n "o1 b _m emotions & ?\ghts :i* are directly sexual1 & t !re w\ld seem to be e reason :y sex1 :i* manife/s v>iety 9 its physical expression1 %\ld be equally v>i\s 9 ! realm ( ! m9d4 ,fur!r ?an ?is1 we are able to advance ! pr9ciple t :5 ! emphasis is laid fur!r away f ! physical level1 ! function+ p[] on t level weak5s4 ,man1 z we h already agre$1 is a m develop$ animal ?an ! elephant1 because he is active 9 ?\ght4 ,b he pays ! price = ?is by ! inf]iority ( 8 physical /r5g?4 ,simil>ly1 ! less m5tally equipp$ are frequ5tly m physically p[]ful4 ,l all o!r rules1 !re are ( c\rse exceptions4 ,b !re does seem to be a pr9ciple1 & a pr9ciple t we %\ld logically expect1 t ! m man functions on :at we h describ$ z sup]-physical levels1 ! less p[]ful 8 /r5g? on ! physical level becomes4 ,aga91 we h se5 t1 morally1 ! physical level is ! l[e/4 ,! highe/ human developm5ts are ^? :i* ! animal _c rea*4 ,! ord9>y physical in/9cts are n evil1 !y are simply less evolv$4 ,"s ( !m1 l ! s5se ( mat]nity1 are good4 ,b we _c d\bt t man's sup]iority ov] ! animal lies precisely 9 8 ability to d :at ! animal _c d1 & t1 !re=e1 ! realm ( m9d is high] ?an ! realm ( action4 ,:5 ! ,ca?olic ,*ur* !re=e pres5ts religi\s celibacy#h z be+ ! high] vocation %e is enunciat+ ?is v pr9ciple4 ,%e is n sugge/+ t non-celibacy is an evil /ate4 ,we d n pret5d t ! pr(ession ( cross+-sweep] is evil because ! pr(ession ( prime m9i/] is a high] ambition2 inde$1 x w\ld be probably disa/r\s to p]suade a man :o _h a natural ability to be a cross+-sweep] to qualify z a prime m9i/]4 ,relatively1 a man p]=ms 8 moral duty 9 fulfill+ 8 vocation1 = :atev] grade x may be design$4 ,! true religi\s celibate is ! extreme exception2 no "o %\ld attempt su* p]fection :o has n ! actual call4 ,! means by :i* we realize our true vocation is too individual a "q to ent] ^u "h4 ,! :ole fault ( ! puritanic conception ( sex is to assume t complete repression %\ld be attempt$ by all m51 & t m>riage is solely a concession to failure4#i ,almo/ ! exact rev]se is ! tru?4 ,! celibate is a r>e product4 ,& moreov] he is n "o 9 :om sex is repress$2 he is ess5tially a human be+ 9 :om ! sex-=ce is sublimat$ into non-physical *annels4 ,?is may take ! =m ( extreme religi\s devotion1 9 wide humanit>ianism1 9 a love ( *ildr5 or animals1 9 arti/ic creation or sci5tific rese>*4 ,x becomes true celibacy only :5 ! individual in/9ct is s f> div]t$ t[>ds ^! en]gies t desire = physical sex functions becomes elim9at$4 ,nor is x true t su* a man is b>r52 he is procreat+1 z really z ! fa!r1 a m5tal or spiritual prog5y4 ,we _c emphasize ?is di/9ction too /rongly4 ,= ! va/ majority ( m5 ! celibate life is n int5d$1 & to "s ext5t1 ?\gh1 z we %all see1 n entirely1 o!r rules apply4 ,:at inde$ we h s c>efully to di/+ui% is ! transf]5ce ( sex f ! repression ( sex4 ,to transf] ! sex-=ce is a heal?y & natural en]gy1 :]eas to repress sex is an evil :i* mu/ always t5d to produce un=tunate results4 ,*apt] #e3 ,non-,celibacy ,we h n[ arriv$ at a po9t :]e we c emphasize a fur!r di/9ction4 ,we mu/1 9 fact1 diff]5tiate betwe5 ^? emotions & ?\ghts :i* are sexual 9 ! s5se t !y naturally incite physical sex functions1 & ^? :i* manife/ !mselves 9 non-sexual activities4 ,x may be true t ! en]gy :i* is ex]cis$ 9 ! latt] way is itself sexual2 t does n matt] = our imm$iate purpose4 ,x is suffici5t t ! =ce is at "w 9 a non-sexual *annel4 ,"h !n we h two entirely diff]5t processes4 ,! fir/ is ! %ift+ ( ! emphasis ( ! sex-=ce f body to m9d1 s t ! sex-=ce ceases to be conc5trat$ 9 physical sex-acts & beg9s to be conc]n$ r ) love emotion & sex-?\ght2 ! second is ! transmutation ( ! sex-=ce to non-sexual *annels4 ,bo? ( ^! processes are necess>y 9 ! life ( ! non-celibate4 ,! latt] process is :at happ5s naturally 9 ! case ( ! true religi\s celibate4 ,8 developm5t & temp]am5t are su* t 8 sex-nature f9ds a complete expression1 z we h already se51 9 su* directions z a g5]al love ( humanity1 an int5se spiritual devotion1 ! wor%ip ( art or nature4 ,!re is no repression1 b a full ex]cise ( ! sex activities 9 a non-sexual direction4 ,! va/ majority ( m51 h[ev]1 are n s develop$1 & are n int5d$ to c>ry out su* a life4 ,yet1 = !m1 too1 ?is process mu/ be to "s ext5t adopt$4 ,x is l>gely a matt] ( common-s5se4 ,! animal ex]cises no re/ra9t2 :5ev] ! sex-impulse arises1 x is satisfi$--s f>1 ( c\rse1 z ! opportunity is provid$4 ,b z we trace ! conduct ( ! m develop$ species f savage to civiliz$ man we are consci\s ( a new elem5t ( w-p[]4 ,! influ5ces :i* cause ?is p[] to come into op]ation may v>y4 ,religi\s obligations1 consid]ations ( bus9ess1 social1 or intellectual responsibilities1 help to int]v5e4 ,an intellig5t man simply _c af=d to give v5t to sex proclivities e "t !y arise2 he has o!r int]e/s :i* mu/ ( necessity at _m times ( ! day h ! fir/ claim4 ,imag9e a man :o sacrific$ a bus9ess engagem5t = "s sex gratification6 ,(t5 9 ! rec5t w> a man1 h[ev] /rong 8 sexual emotions1 w\ld be =c$ to ca/ away all ideas ( sex 9 ord] to dodge a %ell2 8 m9d = cont9u\s p]iods w\ld be s driv5 ) anxieties & ! /ress ( responsibility t sex w\ld s9k into insignificance4 ,?is is an extreme in/ance1 b to a less] degree x is :at is happ5+ to ev]yone :o leads a normal life4 ,! m develop$ ! man1 ! wid] 8 intellectual int]e/s2 & x is precisely 9 ?is capacity to ex]cise 8 w-p[] t he proves 8 sup]iority ov] ! animal4 ,?is process ( transmutation is ! rem$y :i* mu/ be appli$ 9 cases :]e m5 f9d !mselves ! victims ( sexual emotion out ( all true proportion1 :e!r 9 m>ri$ or unm>ri$ life4 ,m]e repression is useless2 x is actually h>mful4 ,b ! m9d mu/ be swit*$ (f to dig a ?\ght-passage 9 o!r directions1 9 non-sexual int]e/s4 ,:]e !re is undue sex obsession !re is disease4 ,& ?is m5tal transf]5ce is ! *ief cure4 ,really1 ?is transmutation is a diffus+ ( ! sex-=ce into a wide g5]al area4 ,! man is no long] conc5trat+ all 8 sex-en]gy 9 love = "o p>ticul> p]son2 he is beg9n+ sexually to love all humanity4 ,he is f9d+ sexual expression 9 ! non-sexual =ms ( art or nature4 ,he is /ill 9 love--b 9 love ) love1 r ?an ) "o sep>ate p]sonal fragm5t ( ! :ole4 ,b ) ! ord9>y man1 !re mu/ rema9 a balance ( sexual incl9ation :i* _c entirely be transmut$4 ,"h we enc\nt] ! fir/ process1 & our problem1 p>ticul>ly 9 non-m>ri$ life1 becomes acute4 ,is x possible1 & is x heal?y1 to d5y ! sex-in/9cts all satisfaction8 ,diff]5t answ]s are giv5 by religi\s advis]s & by m5 ( ! _w1 :ile ev5 9 ! ranks ( ! m$ical pr(ession !re is no cons5sus ( op9ion4 ,i sugge/ t !re is only "o g5]al pr9ciple :i* c be our guide4 ,! natural t5d5cy ( all sexual ?\ght & emotion is to f9d its outlet 9 physical expression ( "s k9d4 ,if a man indulges 9 sexual ?\ght1 x is almo/ impossible = him to avoid a physical result4 ,he may h rec\rse to pro/itution or he may commit solit>y practices4 ,! t5d5cy ( ,puritan morality is1 z we h se51 to reg>d ! physical act z ! s9 & to avoid ! conclusion t ! ?\ght is evil2 consequ5tly ! pati5t is urg$ at all co/ to refra9 f action4 ,let x be /at$1 q frankly1 t ?is attitude is sci5tifically & morally indef5sible4 ,x is ! ?\ght r ?an ! act on :i* ! responsibility %\ld be weigh$4 ,i h no hesitation :atev] 9 ass]t+ t x is worse1 m$ically & morally1 = ! individual to indulge 9 sexual ?\ght & repress ! consequ5t action1 ?an to commit x4 ,! m]e abs5ce ( physical conduct is h>mful & deplorable if ! m9d is a see?+ mass ( sexual en]gy :i* is be+ d5i$ all outlet4 ,! fir/ duty 9 su* cases is1 z we h se51 to apply ! process ( transmut+ ?is sexual ?\ght to non-sexual int]e/s1 s f> z ?is c be done4 ,! ext5t to :i* ?is is possible mu/ v>y 9 ea* individual nature4 ,! comp>ative balance !n rema9s4 ,& "h we mu/ br+ into play ! moral pr9ciple to :i* ,i h already ref]r$--namely t ! morality ( sex is det]m9$ by ! ext5t to :i* love is ! motive4 ,sex inspir$ by love is moral2 sex inspir$ by any o!r motive is n4 ,! "p :i* ! physical sex-=ce %\ld alone play is ! sacram5tal expression ( pure love2 s employ$ x is a p]fect & div9e activity4 ,:5 ! love-motive is abs5t1 or is n ! dom9ant inc5tive1 ! sex-=ce becomes comp>atively immoral & abus$4 ,?is is a g5]al pr9ciple :i* c be rigidly employ$4 ,& ,i d n want to escape f ! consequ5ces ( ?is doctr9e4 ,x appe>s to me ! "o natural1 fundam5tal pr9ciple ^u :i* a moral /&>d c be bas$4 ,!re=e ,i am ready to accept ! conclusion t !re are _m m>riages :i* are highly immoral because ! sex-act is n an expression ( love1 b ei!r a m]e me*anical duty or ! result ( a physical & emotional excitem5t1 z di/9ct f love4 ,on ! o!r h& !re are _m sex adv5tures1 inspir$ by love1 :i* d n occur )9 ! matrimonial /ate4 ,?is pr9ciple alone mu/ guide u 9 any moral e/imate we draw4 ,let u apply ?is doctr9e by tak+ ! simple case ( a man & woman :o are accus$ ( hav+ committ$ adult]y4 ,we inquire fir/1 :e!r mutual love 0 ! true motive1 :e!r 9 fact ! act ( adult]y 0 an unprem$itat$ incid5t :i* occurr$ z naturally z ! kiss :i* a *ild gives to its "m4 ,we draw a cle> moral l9e betwe5 ! sort ( assignation :i* has = its "o object ! gratification ( physical s5sations1 or ! ev5 l[] motive1 s f> z ! pro/itute is conc]n$1 ( sub/itut+ = love ! e>n+ ( a few %ill+s4 ,b suppose we are satisfi$ t ! physical act 0 n ! object b ! result1 & t !re 0 love4 ,we g on to ask h[ deep 0 ! love1 & if a deep love is alleg$1 we ask :y ! p>ties are n m>ri$4 ,= x is d\btful :e!r normal love c be :olly spasmodic4 ,x seems contr>y to ! v nature ( love t a man %\ld love "o woman = an h\r & !n ?r[ h] ov] = someone else4 ,! ess5ce ( love t5ds to complet5ess & p]man5ce4 ,b we w imag9e t ev5 ^! conditions are satisfi$1 & t f9ancial difficulties or p>5tal objections alone prev5t ! =mal m>riage4 ,we h also discov]$ t ! two p h lov$ ea* o!r = "s "t1 & t !re is n !re=e simply a sudd5 fasc9ation1 b a love bas$ on k & matur$ by exp]i5ce4 ,we are !n left ) a te*nical & n a moral (f5ce4 ,9 effect a m>riage has tak5 place2 !re has be5 ! cons5t :i* is ! ess5ce ( ! union4 ,x is only :5 ! ,ca?olic conception ( ! sacram5t ( matrimony is ab&on$ t we f9d ourselves reg>d+ ! c]emony 9 ,*ur* or regi/ry-(fice z ! union1 & t !re=e a moral (f5ce is committ$ 9 ! sex-act :]e no su* c]emony has tak5 place4 ,x is true t ! p>ties w\ld be 9 hon\r b\nd to receive ! bless+ ( ! ,*ur*4 ,! union is irregul>2 b x is a true union4 ,incid5tally1 ,i sugge/ t ?is !ory may be ! basis ( ! scriptural exception 9 ,/4 ,mat!w's gospel made z reg>ds divorce :]e !re has be5 =nication1 or a pre-m>ital sex-act--namely t by ?is act a natural m>riage has be5 consummat$1 & t ! subsequ5t m>riage is !re=e invalid4 ,"o might almo/ draw up a s*$ule ( ! te/s :i* %\ld be appli$ :5ev] we may happ5 to be =c$ to adjudicate z to ! morality ( any sex-behavi\r4 ,= already !re h em]g$ c]ta9 def9ite te/-pr9ciples4 ,!re is ! consid]ation ( ! /&>d ( ! relative degree ( intellig5ce to :i* ! p>ticul> individual has develop$1 & ( ! fact t !re are _m types ( sex-temp]am5t4 ,on ! o!r h& we see t ! direction ( absolute morality to :i* our faces %\ld be set1 is ! rais+ ( ! sex-=ce to sup]-physical levels1 s t ! physical side becomes a m]e incid5t1 or is ev5 elim9at$ altoge!r4 ,!n we apply ! rule t !re mu/ be an ex]cise ( re/ra9t & w-p[]1 s t sex obsession is entirely avoid$4 ,! ext5t to :i* ! m9d c be div]t$ f sexual *annels mu/ dep5d on ! /age ( developm5t :i* ! individual has rea*$4 ,la/ly1 we apply ! te/ ( h[ f> love1 s deep & pure t x is p]man5t r ?an spasmodic1 a monopoly r ?an promiscu\s1 is ! motive4 ,mod]n society has gone1 ,i cont5d1 z mu* a/ray 9 drift+ to ! extreme ( consid]+ all ?+s p]missible1 z has ,puritanism 9 reg>d+ ! sex-act outside m>riage z 9 all circum/ances a deadly evil4 ,& ,i c only m>vel t ?is latt] attitude is tak5 up s (t5 9 ! "n ( ! ,*ri/ian religion1 :5 its ,f\nd]1 :ile decl>+ t at ! la/ day x w\ld be m tol]able = ,sodom & ,gomorrah ?an = ! ,scribes & ,ph>isees1 also said to ! woman tak5 9 adult]y1 ,nei!r d ,i condemn !e2 g ?y way1 f h5ce=? s9 no m4 ,*apt] #f3 ,divorce ,9 leav+ ! moorl& ( g5]al pr9ciples = ! fields ( p>ticul> problems x w be conv5i5t to gr\p sex natures "u ?ree heads3 7#a7 ! normal or het]o-sexual1 7#b7 ! inv]t or homo-sexual1 & 7#c7 ! neut] or sexless4 ,x is necess>y only to add t x w n be possible to deal 9 m ?an ! m]e/ outl9e ) any ( ^! important que/ions4 ,! mo/ prom95t ( ! problems conc]n$ ) ! normal gr\p is t ( divorce4 ,! problem arises because on ! "o h& !re is a s5se t m>riage ought to be a p]man5t /ate1 :ile on ! o!r1 !re are _m human exig5ces :i* g to break up p>ticul> m>riages4 ,sep>ation1 )\t p]mission to re-m>ry1 is ( c\rse an admitt$ rem$y4 ,b ! "q !n arises :e!r p>ties s sep>at$ w cont9ue to live z celibates2 & z x appe>s c]ta9 t ! va/ majority w n1 we h to ask :e!r x is bett] to legalise ! fre% unions :i* are =m$1 or to p]mit adult]y4 ,e mod]n ,/ate has wre/l$ ) ?is problem1 & = ! mo/ "p ineffectually4 ,:]e !re is no divorce1 z 9 ,engl& be=e #aheg1aj or among ! poor] classes :o _c af=d divorce1 irregul> unions & pro/itution und\bt$ly fl\ri%4 ,:]e a compromise is introduc$1 ! p]man5ce ( m>riage1 & !re=e ( ! home1 becomes correspond+ly impair$1 :ile !re are left a numb] ( unhappy cases = :i* divorce is n all[$4#aa ,! ,engli% civil law is p>ticul>ly unhappy 9 its compromise4 ,x is bas$ on ! ,prote/ant int]pretation ( ! passage 9 ,/4 ,mat!w already m5tion$1 namely t divorce is p]missible :]e adult]y has occurr$1 & x goes on to make x easi] = ! husb& to sue = divorce :5 ! wife has committ$ adult]y ?an = ! wife to d s 9 ! rev]se circum/ances4 ,h5ce x places a premium on adult]y1 & exagg]ates its importance z reg>ds o!r s9s4 ,x delib]ately incites an unhappy wife to commit adult]y 9 ord] to obta9 relief--%e c usually evade ! vigilance ( ! ,k+'s ,proctor--& x s+les out adult]y z a worse s9 ?an1 let u say1 cruelty or habitual drunk5ness1 = :i* divorce is n at pres5t obta9able4 ,9 fact x is difficult to f9d any logical or moral def5ce = ! ,engli% law z x /&s4 ,let u fir/ see h[ f> ! popul> critics ( ! ,ca?olic doctr9e ( indissoluble m>riage are wrong4 ,!y reg>d m>riage z simply a contract1 f :i* x foll[s t divorce %\ld be obta9$ by mutual cons5t1 or ev5 on ! application ( "o ( ! p>ties4 ,b ?is ignores1 among o!r ?+s1 "o vital natural law4 ,m>riage begets p>5?ood1 & betwe5 ! p>5ts ( ! same *ild !re is a def9ite & p]man5t relation%ip4 ,no ,act ( ,p>liam5t c make m5 & wom5 cease to be ! p>5ts ( _! own *ildr54 ,nor1 ev5 9 *ildless m>riages1 is ! s5se ( p]man5ce an artificial conv5tion :i* c be aboli%$ by ! decree ( a c\rt4 ,! deep] ! love1 ! m p]man5t mu/ its nature t5d to be4 ,love is n a contract2 x is a spiritual bond4 ,x is impossible1 ,i cont5d1 to ?9k ( a normally heal?y m>riage )\t realiz+ t bo? ! man & woman naturally ent] into x ) ! assumption t x w be a p]man5t relation%ip4 ,! possibility ( a family1 ! break-up ( ! maid5 life--ev5 ! furni%+ ( a home1 is evid5ce ( a /rong probability 9 ! m9ds ( ! p>ties t ! /ep :i* is be+ tak5 is some?+ m ?an a tempor>y contract4 ,inde$1 ! m>riage is only tempor>y if unhapp9ess arises4 ,m5 & wom5 m>ry because !y want to ent] into z p]man5t a relation%ip z possible2 !y ent] into x because1 z !y say1 !y wi% to settle d[n4 ,! natural desire ( man is t m>riage %\ld be p]man5t4 ,a rev]sion to free love w\ld be m ?an ! undo+ ( ! evolution f animal to man4 ,x w\ld completely *ange ! basis ( human society4 ,& 9 proportion z any divorce law enc\rages ! conception ( a tempor>y contract ?is dang]\s in/ability ( home-life is ?reat5$4 ,am]icans sometimes describe _! own laws z approa*+ ! ideal4 ,! "q w soon be1 wrote a j\rnali/ describ+ ! ,am]ican sm>t set1 :o is to be y\r husb& next ye>8--or1 ,has y\r la/ season's wife re-m>ri$ yet8 ,?is is ( c\rse an exagg]ation2 b x is a w>n+ z to logical developm5ts4 ,9 fact1 divorce t5ds to create itself4 ,divorce is only appli$ = :]e ! m>riage is unhappy4 ,a fair proportion ( unhappy m>riages arise because !y h be5 ha/ily ent]$ into2 ) due inquiry _m ( !m c\ld h be5 prev5t$4 ,b ! easi] divorce is to obta91 ! m inc5tive w be giv5 to ent] into ^! ha/y m>riages--! type ( union :i* s (t5 gives rise to divorce4 ,on ! o!r h&1 :atev] _! cause1 !re are m>riages 9 :i* all trace ( love has disappe>$1 & x may fairly be argu$ t ! union is dead4 ,?us a husb& may1 9 lat] ye>s1 become incurably insane or habitually drunk4 ,!re are _m unions 9 :i* ! "o p>ty has m>ri$ 9 bl9d infatuation only to discov] t ! p>tn] is s contemptible a creature z to de/roy all ve/ige ( love4 ,su* unions rema9 m>riages 9 =mality only2 _! pret5d$ exi/5ce is a sacrilege1 p>ticul>ly if !re are no *ildr5 & ! husb& & wife are n !re=e co-relat$ z p>5ts4 ,= all su* cases ! ,ca?olic ,*ur* p]mits divorce 7a m5sa et ?oro7--or sep>ation1 z x is kn[n 9 civil law1 )\t p]mission to re-m>ry4 ,! issue1 !re=e1 becomes simply a "q z to :e!r x is "r to expect ! p>ties s sep>at$ to rema9 celibate4 ,9 an outl9e su* z ?is1 ,i suppose t "o c only attempt a summ>y reply to ^! que/ions4 ,if1 = a mom5t1 we are to exclude ! complications ( a subsequ5t love-affair !re appe>s to me to be no reason :atev] :y any man or woman %\ld n rema9 celibate dur+ ! lifetime ( ! divorc$ p>tn]4 ,! j\rnalese !ory t x is unnatural & unheal?y = p s to rema9 is simply untrue1 s long z ! celibacy takes ! =m ( sublimation or transmutation & n repression4 ,! complication ( an int5se love-romance h[ev]1 is a s]i\s proposition4 ,ought two p 9 love to rema9 sexually ap>t simply because "o ( !m is /ill m>ri$ to1 let u say1 an incurable lunatic8 ,9 pr9ciple !re seems to be e reason :y !y %\ld2 no actual physical or m5tal h>m is done to !m1 provid$ !y h a suffici5tly develop$ w-p[] to transf] _! sex-desire into o!r *annels ( activity4 ,! sacrifice w be imm5se1 b x is no m ?an any man has to make :o refra9s f m>ry+ 8 belov$ because he is too poor or is suff]+ f "s disease :i* may affect 8 *ildr54 ,9 ?is case ! sacrifice is (f]$ = ! supremely important pr9ciple t only ,god1 by ! act ( dea?1 c undo ! v9culum ( ! orig9al m>riage4 ,b ,i am equally sure t mo/ p "u ^! or less int5se circum/ances w n rema9 celibate4 ,!re=e1 to desc5d f !ory to practice1 ,i see no alt]native b to draw a rigid l9e betwe5 civil & religi\s m>riages4 ,! ,/ate mu/ make its own arrangem5ts & g its own way4 ,b !re %\ld always be a high] type ( m>riage :]e ! ,ca?olic ,*ur* has be5 invok$ = h] bless+4 ,& = ^? :o *oose to ask = ?is sacram5t1 ! union %\ld be irrevocable1 save by dea?4 ,! p>ties w receive t sacram5t kn[+ :at a heavy responsibility !y are assum+4 ,& x is only "r t ! ,*ur* %\ld be f> m p>ticul> 9 refus+ to pro/itute h] sacram5tal grace on unions :i* ought n to be consummat$4 ,%e ought1 ,i conceive1 rigidly to inquire into ! desirability ( ! union1 & n to give h] bless+ unless %e is satisfi$ t bo? p>ties are giv+ _! cons5t ) z full a k ( ! facts z is humanly possible4 ,equally %e %\ld refuse h] m9i/rations :]e %e is unconv9c$ t love is ! motive ( ! m>riage4 ,i see no reason :y "s =m ( sponsor%ip %\ld n be dem&$4 ,& ,i ?9k x may be argu$ t a cons5t )\t a k ( ! facts is n a valid cons5t1 & t su* a union is null4 ,i %\ld welcome a c>eful ext5sion ( ! decree ( nullity1 = t reason4 ,*apt] #g3 ,eug5ics & ,pro/itution ,! doctr9e t love is ! only motive = sex--t physical expression is pure only s f> z x is ! sacram5tal accid5ce ( love--leads to important conclusions4 ,!re is1 = in/ance1 a class ( morali/ :o tea* t ! sex-act 9 m>riage mu/ only be = ! purpose ( procreation4 ,x w\ld foll[ f ?is t x is immoral = sex intimacies to occur betwe5 a man & 8 wife once %e has pass$ a c]ta9 age4 ,9 ! ideal m>riage1 s ?is s*ool ( ?\ght affirms1 copulation is /rictly regulat$ & occurs only :5 ! mom5t is fav\rable = g5]ation4 ,to ?is !ory ,i _c subscribe4 ,x runs c\nt] to ! doctr9e 9 :i* ,i believe4 ,x ,*anges ! sex-act f an incid5t or a result to a means or a cause4 ,x is really immoral because x lays emphasis on ! physical4 ,?is cold-blood$ calculation ( ! times :5 sex is to be ?us physically express$ is ! exact opposite ( ! pr9ciple by :i* love directs & ! act m]ely occurs1 ) no purpose b to express love physically4 ,?is leads u to a consid]ation z to h[ f> ^? practices betwe5 man & woman are moral 9 :i* procreation _c result4 ,x is int]e/+ to note t ! ,engli% law holds t unnatural acts betwe5 husb& & wife are crim9al4 ,al?\gh x is true t prosecution _c occur unless !re is an abs5ce ( cons5t1 = o!rwise !re w\ld be no evid5ce--^! acts are app>5tly reg>d$ z p] se crim9al 9 nature4 ,& ?is inde$ is a logical position1 :5 we rememb] ! /&po9t :i* ! ,/ate adopts t[>ds all sex que/ions4 ,to ?is class ( conduct artificial prev5tatives are closely alli$4 ,a *aos ( op9ion rages ov] ?is subject1 f ! neo-mal?usian :o advocates ! practice z a necessity1 to ! puri/ :o talks ( *ild-murd]4 ,x seems cle> t ?is latt] designation is an unw>rantable exagg]ation2 to prev5t ! possibility ( life com+ into exi/5ce _c by any /ra9 ( imag9ation be confus$ ) de/roy+ :at is actually alive4 ,on ! o!r h&1 ! moral te/ :i* we are apply+ to all ^! problems h>dly acquits ! practice4 ,x is difficult to ?9k ( prev5tatives )\t be+ consci\s t prem$itation ( ! physical act is be+ emphasiz$1 & ! ideal ( a natural incid5t almo/ bani%$4 ,to prep>e = a ?+ is to insi/ on its importance4 ,! m9ds ( ! two p>ties mu/ almo/ necess>ily be focuss$--?\gh n absolutely necess>ily--on ! physical sex-act4 ,!re is no d\bt h[ev] t1 ap>t f ideals1 prev5tatives are a means ( av]t+ m s]i\s evils4 ,?is is n ! place to ent] into a detail$ consid]ation ( eug5ics4 ,we c only face ! blatant fact t ?\s&s ( deg5]ate p>5ts cont9ue ea* ye> to bre$ deg5]ate *ildr54 ,! moral aspect ) :i* alone ,i am deal+1 is t ?is is a crime aga9/ ! community2 h[ev] irresponsible or ignorant ! p]petrators1 !y are help+ to burd5 ! ,/ate ) an altoge!r undesirable prog5y4 ,n[1 :e!r !y are all[$ to m>ry or n1 !re is n ! lea/ likelihood t !y w desi/ f sexual int]c\rse4 ,!re=e1 x seems to me an obvi\sly less] evil to remove all excuse = procreation by plac+ )9 rea* ! artificial means ( prev5tion4 ,9 ?is1 j z 9 ! divorce problem1 we h to det]m9e :e!r x is bett] to insi/ on an ideal1 :i* we "k ! majority w n keep1 or to legislate d[n to ! majority4 ,!re is no d\bt 9 my own m9d t to legislate on an ideal is n only impracticable b dang]\s4 ,i may believe1 = in/ance1 t x w\ld be a high] ideal to live on vegetables & fruit r ?an to slaught] animals & dr9k _! blood4 ,b ev5 s1 ,i %\ld vehem5tly oppose a law :i* attempt$ to impose veget>ianism4 ,i believe1 too1 t e moral influ5ce %\ld be br\ght to be> aga9/ m>riages :]e ! physical or m5tal deg5]acy#ab ( ! p>5ts r5d]s ! use ( prev5tatives desirable4 ,i wi% to emphasize t ! ideal t[>ds :i* we %\ld set our faces is t ( few] b heal?i] m>riages4 ,bo? ,*ur* & ,/ate %\ld1 ,i feel1 take pa9s to assure !mselves t ^! undesirable elem5ts are abs5t 9 all unions :i* !y are respectively call$ ^u to solemnize4 ,& ,i emphasize ?is because ,i believe t we are suff]+ f> too mu* f ! popul> fallacy & ! smug ,puritanic doctr9e t ! cure = all sexual proclivities is = m5 & wom5 to m>ry1 & t once !y m>ry all ?+s are sexually p]missible4 ,x is n only irritat+1 b x is a fallacy1 = m5 :o are com=tably m>ri$ to decl>e t !re is really no sex-problem4 ,!re is probably z mu* immorality )9 ! m>ri$ /ate z outside x2 & f> f x be+ ! duty ( e man to m>ry1 !re are _m m5 ^: duty x is n to d s4 ,closely alli$ ) eug5ics is ! problem ( v5]eal disease1 & out ( ?is aga91 arises ! problem ( pro/itution4 ,h[ f> is pro/itution tol]able1 s t a m$ical sy/em ( regi/ration %\ld be introduc$ into ,engl&8 ,we h se5 :y pro/itution is immoral2 x is conc]n$ ) ! physical side ( sex1 & ) little else4 ,b no ?\ghtful man c\ld reasonably advocate ! suppression ( pro/itution by law4 ,! result ( su* a measure1 at ! pres5t /ate ( national developm5t1 w\ld be deplorable1 ev5 if x 7 practicable4 ,p d n become moral because !y are fright5$ to d :at !y /ill want to d4 ,x is always a confession ( ! weakness ( religion or moral influ5ces :]e y h to fall back on ! police-=ce ( ! ,/ate = support4 ,9 moral que/ions1 ,/ate prosecution seems only to be ju/ifiable :]e ! lib]ty ( individuals1 or ! welf>e ( ! community1 is endang]$4 ,pro/itution#ac z an evil c only be treat$ by ! sl[ process ( moral education4 ,( t ,i %all speak lat]4 ,b x is wor? :ile rememb]+ 9 ?is connexion1 t ! fem9i/ movem5t mu/ h a b5eficial effect1 to "s ext5t1 on pro/itution4 ,l>gely1 x is an economic problem4 ,if a woman 7 able to e>n a dec5t wage1 x is inconceivable t %e %\ld wi% to submit h]self to e voluptu\s patron :o happ5s to come along4 ,education & economic indep5d5ce mu/ t5d l>gely to bre$ dissatisfaction ) su* a slavi% occupation4 ,x w n d s entirely1 = a c]ta9 p]c5tage ( wom5 are pro/itutes because !y hung] = promiscu\s sex int]c\rse4 ,t "s s]i\s attempt mu/ be made1 n m]ely to alleviate1 b to prev5t v5]eal disease1 is evid5t to all :o are aw>e h[ widespread x has become4 ,& x may !re=e be po9t$ out t x w\ld n be impossible to prosecute ! pro/itute1 suff]+ f ^! diseases1 )\t introduc+ ! vex$ "q ( regi/ration & (ficial recognition ( pro/itution4 ,all unm>ri$ m5 & wom5 bel[ a c]ta9 age c\ld be compell$ to submit to p]iodical m$ical exam9ation1 & if any p]son 0 f\nd to h solicit$1 aft] hav+ be5 c]tifi$ z infect$1 prosecution w\ld lie4 ,probably a /orm ( prote/ w\ld be ar\s$ aga9/ an alleg$ int]f]5ce ) individual privacy4 ,b ! dang] ( syphilis may necessitate su* a law1 & aft] all1 no "o is be+ ask$ to d m ?an t to :i* e soldi] & sailor has to submit4 ,we h se5 t love1 & !re=e m>riage1 naturally conta9s ! s5se ( p]man5ce4 ,!re is also a s5se ( di/a/e t[>ds ince/1 & ( ! app>5tly natural evils aris+ !refrom4 ,no-"o w d5y t ! ,/ate & ! ,ca?olic ,*ur* are sci5tifically ju/ifi$ 9 insi/+ ^u "s table ( prohibit$ degrees4 ,h[ f> ?is di/a/e is ess5tially natural ,i d n "k4 ,i imag9e t a si/] :o _h be5 sep>at$ f h] bro!r s9ce bir?1 & :o did n "k t he 0 h] bro!r1 might fall 9 love ) him4 ,b ! sci5tific dang]s ( su* m>riages w\ld rema94#ad ,! ,*ur* ( ,engl& "s ye>s ago f\nd h]self imm]s$ 9 a /orm ( controv]sy ov] ! ,deceas$ ,wife's ,si/] ,act4 ,to mo/ m5 h] attitude seem$ p$antic & unwor?y ( s]i\s att5tion4 ,! ,engli% ,*ur* is un=tunate3 h] app>5tly n>r[ ecclesia/icism 0 really ! result ( a lib]al policy at ! "t ( ! ,re=mation4 ,dur+ ! ,middle ,ages ! ,*ur* _h ext5d$ h] prohibit$ degrees to su* an ext5t t x mu/ h be5 difficult to "k :om "o c\ld m>ry )\t a disp5sation4#ae ,only a p]son m ?an f\r degrees remov$ f ! o!r p>ty 0 an eligible p>tn] )\t disp5sation1 ! degrees s be+ reckon$ z to include ev5 second c\s9s4 ,! ,engli% ,*ur* swept away ^! anomalies & conc5trat$ on an irr$ucible m9imum ( prohibition up to ?ree degrees 7reckon$ 9 direct asc5d+ & desc5d+ g5]ation f ! common ance/or7--?us sacrific+ all regulation aga9/ m>riage betwe5 fir/ c\s9s1 :o are f\r degrees remov$4 ,! real opposition to ! ecclesia/ical attitude 01 h[ev]1 t any aff9ity1 z di/+ui%$ f consangu9ity1 %\ld be a b> to m>riage4 ,! unhappy deceas$ wife's si/] 0 m]ely a conv5i5t repres5tative4 ,b ?is is a controv]sy :i* is n suffici5tly imm95t to engage u 9 ^! pages4 ,*apt] #h3 ,! ,homosexual ,temp]am5t ,we mu/ n[ pass f ! normal or het]o-sexual to ! second-class ( sex-temp]am5t4 ,?is is ! homosexual--t 9 :i* ! individual's sex attraction is direct$ t[>ds ! same sex4 ,& "h x w be necess>y to utt] a note ( w>n+4 ,! sex in/9ct lies s deep 9 human nature t _m m5 are incapable ( reg>d+ sex *>act]i/ics save ?r\gh _! own temp]am5tal col\r4 ,normal m5 are frequ5tly f\nd1 = in/ance1 ( su* und]develop$ m5tal faculties t !y />t out ) an imm5se sex prejudice aga9/ ! homosexual4 ,)\t be+ able to consid] ! "q imp>tially !y abhor ?is v>iety z an unspeakable evil4 ,x is ess5tial t we %\ld place su* critics outside ! area ( practical inve/igation4 ,! homosexual t5d5cy may be z evil z !y imag9e x to be1 b we mu/ only arrive at t conclusion z a result ( imp>tial & inconte/able reason4 ,& any man :o _c und]take t inquiry is z valueless = our purpose z are 8 prejudicial op9ions2 he mu/ simply g back to ! nurs]y4 ,let u !re=e1 z f> z is individually possible1 attempt to treat ?is "q ) an op5 m9d4 ,& accord+ly we %all f9d x mo/ conv5i5t fir/ to consid] ! v>i\s attitudes :i* h be5 tak5 up ) reg>d to ?is difficult problem4 ,! legal or ,/ate attitude we h already to "s ext5t anticipat$4 ,! ,/ate looks ) suspici\s eyes on any influ5ce :i* t5ds to /]ilize ! bir?-rate4 ,accord+ly1 9 ,engl&1 homosexuality is br&$ z a crime = :i* a heavy s5t5ce c be pron\nc$4 ,x is true t legally ?is s5t5ce1 "u ! ,crim9al ,am5dm5t ,act1 c only be inflict$ = ! physical sex-act itself2 b ?is includes any assault or any behavi\r :i* may be con/ru$ z an attempt to lead up to ! commission ( ! act4 ,&1 accord+ly1 any man is legally "u suspicion if he is ?\ght to be homosexual1 ev5 ?\gh no p]petration ( ! physical (f5ce c be alleg$ aga9/ him4 ,! hide\s sy/em ( blackmail is ?us enc\rag$ by ! law4 ,once a man is und]/ood to be subject to ^! proclivities1 x is assum$ t soon] or lat] he w commit ! (f5ce1 & he is wat*$1 if n by ! ov]-busy police1 by ^? idle p]sons :o trade ^u ! legal attitude t[>d ?is problem4 ,any conv]sation or lit]ature on ! subject is suppress$1 s f> z is possible1 by ! ,/ate1 because ! physical expression be+ a crime1 all t may become an inc5tive to ! crime is itself crim9al4 ,we h already m5tion$ ! basic fallacy ( ! legal attitude4 ,x does n foll[ t because a l9e ( conduct may decrease ! bir?-rate1 x is !re=e wrong4 ,celibacy1 z we h se51 may be an actual virtue4 ,b 9 ?is p>ticul> in/ance !re is a /ill m s]i\s error4 ,! ,engli% law1 by br&+ homosexuality z a crime1 assumes t x is a delib]ate p]v]sion2 = x w\ld be obvi\sly ridicul\s to puni% a man = do+ :at he c\ld n help do+4 ,ev5 ! law is n s illogical z to s5t5ce a madman to p5al s]vitude because he insi/s on be+ mad4 ,no1 ! ,/ate reg>ds ! homosexual z "o :o has ( 8 own *oice assum$ ?is =m ( sex temp]am5t1 9 ! same way z a man decides to rob or =ge a signature4 ,! legal attitude mu/ re/ on ?is supposition1 = o!rwise its policy w\ld be flagrantly unju/4 ,& accord+ly we f9d ! law classify+ ?is family ( behavi\r z unnatural4 ,n[1 if !re is "o fact :i* is cle> f an inve/igation ( ! problem1 x is t ?is supposition is z false z x is possible = any supposition to be4 ,let x be grant$ t a c]ta9 numb] ( homosexual (f5ces are committ$ by p]sons :o are sexually normal 9 temp]am5t4 ,!re rema9s ! :ole body ( homosexuals1 ( ^?1 t is to say1 9 :om ! homog5ic attraction is z integral a "p ( _! nature z ! appreciation ( music or ! love ( col\r4 ,abundant pro( ( ?is cont5tion is to h&4 ,!re h be5 ?\s&s ( individuals 9 e age1 includ+ ! pres5t1 :o h nev] he>d ( homosexuality1#af h nev] met o!r homosexuals1 or come into contact ) any?+ approa*+ homosexual practice2 & yet !y h be5 homosexual all _! lives4 ,i h kn[n p]sons :o believ$ t no "o else 9 ! _w %>$ _! aspirations1 & also h suff]$ tortures because ( _! suppos$ isolat$ abnormality4 ,! ,/ate attitude simply ignores ?is factor1 & accord+ly reveals itself z unsci5tific4 ,x is true t p]haps by su* an ag5cy z psy*o-analysis reasons c\ld be f\nd 9 _m ( ^! cases :y ! individual _h develop$ on inv]t$ sex l9es2 home repressions1 ! sy/em ( e>ly education1 ! age ( ! p>5ts1 ^! or o!r influ5ces1 may h produc$ a complex :i* has swit*$ ! sex-nature on to a p>ticul> pa?4 ,b ^! reasons d n necess>ily %[ ! result to be artificial2 x is our v nature inde$ :i* ^! influ5ces con/ruct4 ,x is impossible to trace an exact l9e betwe5 ! inh]5t nature & ! effect :i* outside influ5ces h _h ^u x4 ,we mu/1 & we d 9 fact1 reg>d ! p]man5t & fundam5tal traits1 h[ev] d]iv$1 z natural4 ,moreov] psy*o-analysis def9itely indicates t !re is a homosexual p]iod ?r\gh :i* all individuals inevitably pass4 ,! ,/ate !ory t ! temp]am5t is unnatural _c !re=e be support$ on any gr\nds1 except 9 ! cases :]e x is delib]ately assum$ by normal p]sons4 ,9 mo/ cases x is natural to ! individual's nature1 & n unnatural1 b abnormal4 ,once ?is simple sci5tific tru? is grasp$ ! legal attitude is se5 to crumble 9 all directions4 ,! case = crim9al prosecution re/s logically on ! assumption t unless homosexual practices are rigidly suppress$ !y w spread4 ,& s9ce _! increase w\ld s]i\sly dim9i% ! bir?-rate ! ,/ate is necess>ily anxi\s to av]t ?is dang]4 ,b x is an odd p]v]sion :i* imag9es t sob] respectable citiz5s are only re/ra9$ f indulg+ 9 homosexual vice by ! ?reat ( p5al s]vitude6 ,once ! sci5tific tru? is grasp$ & homosexuality is se5 to be1 except 9 a small numb] ( cases1 ! natural temp]am5t ( a small m9ority1 x w be realiz$ t normal p]sons are n likely to wi% to commit unnatural acts1 :e!r !re is or !re is n a p5al law2 nor c any ,act ( ,p>liam5t prev5t homosexuals f be+ homosexual4 ,& 9 practice ?is !oretical conclusion is f\nd to hold true4 ,= 9 ! c\ntries1 su* z ,france1 :]e ! ,code ,napoleon does n cov] ^! prosecutions1 homosexuality is f> less rife ?an 9 ,engl&1 or 9 ,g]many1 :]e until ! ,revolution ! p5al law 0 rigidly en=c$4 ,x is well t we %\ld face ^! facts unres]v$ly1 h[ev] /rong may be our p]sonal antipa?y to ! practices4 99 99 99 99 99 ,! second attitude may be describ$ g5]ally z t ( society4 ,public op9ion mu/ necess>ily be too vague to admit ( succ9ct def9ition4 ,b g5]ally its attitude t[>ds ?is "q may be def9$ z t ( an ord9>y man t[>ds a freak2 he has no sympa?y ) freaks & inde$ dislikes !m--b !y are s v r>e t he c af=d to ignore !m4 ,! problem ( ! homosexual _c h[ev] be avoid$ 9 ?is way1 = ! simple reason t ! inv]t =ms s comp>atively l>ge & p]man5t a "p ( ! community4 ,x is difficult to attempt an accurate e/imate1 p>tly because _m homosexuals are s afraid ( incurr+ ! odium ( public op9ion t !y successfully disguise _! true nature & are unsuspect$ ev5 by _! mo/ intimate fri5ds4 ,b !re is a m fundam5tal difficulty4 ,x appe>s to be und5iable t a l>ge numb] ( normal p possess to "s ext5t a /ra9 ( ! homosexual temp]am5t4 ,we h1 9 fact1 z 9 almo/ all classifications1 n a naturally divid+ gulf b a gradually asc5d+ scale4 ,"s individuals may h only #e p] c5t4 inv]t$ & #ie p] c5t4 het]o-sexual t5d5cies1 :ile o!rs are only #aj p] c5t4 normal4 ,!re are a l>ge & increas+ numb] ( p]sons :o are almo/ equally balanc$ on ei!r side4 ,^! bisexuals (t5 m>ry happily & at ! same "t enjoy homog5ic exp]i5ces4 ,:5 we rememb] t1 accord+ to psy*o-analysis1 ev]yone ab\t ! age ( pub]ty passes ?r\gh a homosexual /age1 x is probably n an exagg]ation to /ate t few p fail to pres]ve a /ratum ( ?is nature1 h[ev] small ! p]c5tage & h[ev] deeply su* t5d5cies may be buri$ 9 ! unconsci\sness4 ,if h[ev] we decide to draw an arbitr>y di/9ction & to def9e p]sons ) less ?an #cj p] c5t4 inv]t$ nature z normal1 p]sons f #cj to #fj p] c5t4 z bisexual1 & ! rema9d] z homosexual1 we are left ) a consid]able numb] ( ! la/ v>iety4 ,havelock ,ellis has reckon$ ! p]c5tage ( homosexuals among ! pr(essional middle classes 9 ,engl& z #e p] c5t4 & among wom5 z #aj p] c5t4#ag ,9 any case ! popul> view t ! proportion is s small z to be negligible is q impossible1 & is due to ! fact t mo/ m5 are s unobs]vant ( psy*ological evid5ce t _! op9ion is ( little s]i\s value4 ,h[ev] undesirable1 !n1 ?is species ( temp]am5t may be1 x _c be describ$ z unnatural 9 ! s5se ( artificial or unusual4 ,! ?ird or curr5t sci5tific attitude does seem at fir/ to avoid ^! sup]/itions & to re/ on a reasonable basis4 ,?is attitude may be describ$ z t ( reg>d+ homosexuality z a disease1 :i* %\ld nei!r be puni%$ nor ignor$1 b treat$4 ,! !ory t we all pass ?r\gh a homosexual p]iod at a comp>atively e>ly /age1 l5ds support to ?is conclusion4 ,! h]o-age ( boys & girls1 x is urg$1 is almo/ always direct$ t[>ds ! *ild's own sex4 ,!re=e x c fairly be argu$ t :]e ! sex developm5t has be5 re/rict$ to ^! l9es x d5otes "s /range dislocation :i* has prev5t$ natural gr[?4 ,! fact t 9 "s cases ?is cause c actually be trac$--su* z a disappo9tm5t 9 an e>ly love affair ) ! opposite sex1 or to artificial circum/ances :i* h made = celibacy--confirm _m /ud5ts ( sex-sci5ce 9 ?is op9ion4 ,b z if nature delib]ately int5ds to ?w>t all easily atta9$ explanations1 %e sets out c]ta9 facts1 9 practice1 :i* entirely invalidate ! !ory4 ,x is true t _m homosexuals1 bo? m5 & wom51 portray 9 g5]al m5tal effici5cy t peculi> want ( proportion 9 "s direction :i* is ! inevitable symptom ( m5tal abnormality2 ! male may be obvi\sly effem9ate1 or1 male or female1 ecc5tric or hy/]ical4 ,b ?is is di/9ctly ! exception4 ,s f> z my p]sonal exp]i5ce goes1 ! majority ( homosexuals are indi/+ui%able f normal m51 except by "s psy*ic or intuitional s5se1 9 physical or m5tal appe>ance2 & ,i obs]ve t ?is exp]i5ce is %>$ by all ^? sci5ti/s :o h writt5 on ! subject4 ,! und5iable facts are t among ?is m9ority ( ! race a majority ( m5 h1 9 all ages & races1 held a pre-em95t & hon\rable position 9 society1 reveal+ ! brilliance ( sanity r ?an ! abnormality ( g5ius4 ,! homosexual has succe$$ n only z might h be5 expect$ 9 ! arts4 ,x is true t1 9 g5]al1 he possesses c]ta9 fem99e attributes1 su* z a g5tl] & m emotional positivity ?an ! normal4 ,b he has excell$ 9 su* mascul9e pa?s z soldi]+1 /atesman%ip1 & eng9e]+4 ,x is almo/ irritat+1 :]e "o wi%es to f9d support = ! sci5tific explanation1 to turn to hi/ory & discov] t ! homosexual section ( ! ,greeks 7 magnific5t w>riors z well z philosoph]s2 t n only ,%akespe>e1 :o wrote _m ( 8 sonnets to a boy1 or ,mi*ael ,angelo1 b ,alex&] ! ,great1 ,*>les ,,xii ( ,sw$51 ,fr$]ick ,,ii ( ,prussia1 & ,william ,,iii ( ,engl&1 _h _! homosexual t5d5cies4 ,inde$1 7 x p]missible to d s1 x w\ld be possible to in/ance "s ( our mo/ fam\s g5]als & politicians ( mod]n times z possess+ ?is unmi/akable temp]am5t4 ,x is well !n freely to admit t ! sci5tific !ory simply does n squ>e ) ! full facts ( ! case4 ,! f\r? attitude is t ( religion4 ,! ,*ur*'s (ficial position is ma9ly indi/+ui%able f t ( ! ,/ate1 al?\gh ! atmosph]e ( ! ,*ur* has t5d$ l>gely to be cong5ial to ?is developm5t4 ,x is evid5t t ,*ri/ianity 0 influ5c$ 9 its e>ly days by ! appall+ condition ( vice 9 ,roman society1 & x is n to be wond]$ at t a sev]e legacy ( prejudice has be5 inh]it$ 9 ! light ( ?is indescribable exp]i5ce4 ,b ?is br+s u conv5i5tly to a po9t :]e we mu/ admit a fallacy und]ly+ almo/ all consid]ations ( ! homog5ic sex nature4 ,& unless we are able to dispose ( ! fallacy 9 our m9ds1 fur!r inve/igation is useless4 ,! fallacy consi/s ( ! assumption t homosexuality means only ! p]petration ( ! physical sex-act4 ,9 reality ?is is z untrue z to suppose t ! normal man is necess>ily a patron ( pro/itutes4 ,su* a confusion ( ?\ght is obvi\sly ludicr\s4 ,b n less inaccurate is ?is prevail+ idea reg>d+ ! homosexual4 ,n only is ! p>ticul> sex-act1 popul>ly associat$ ) ?is subject1 an extremely r>e occur5ce1 ev5 z among ! physical sex-expressions ( ?is temp]am5t1 b probably a va/ majority ( homosexuals are delib]ately celibate4 ,homosexuality is a romantic cult r ?an a physical vice4 ,n9e-t5?s ( its en]gy is direct$ purely 9 ! realm ( ideals4 ,! old misconception ( sex z a r disreputable physical function aga9 dogs our /eps4 ,b sex is almo/ entirely emotional2 sex-love1 & especially homosexual love1 is n lu/4 ,its desire is romantic & ideali/ic1 & :5 physical incid5ts occur1 !y are usually ! un9t5tional outlets ( ! purely emotional passion4 ,! lit]ature ( homosexuality is almo/ entirely romantic1 & small ?\gh x is =c$ to be1 9 quality & ideal its av]age mu/ rank z extraord9>ily noble4 ,x is noticeable1 inde$1 t 9 a l>ge proportion ( ! unpleasant cases :i* are tri$ 9 police-c\rts1 ! (f5d]s are admitt$ly normal m5 :o h delib]ately p]petrat$ homosexual acts = v>i\s causes1 su* z a neurotic desire = novelty1 or ! desire to avoid disease4 ,!re are also ! consid]able class ( p]v]t$ normals ^: deviation f _! natural pa? z ! result ( "s su* influ5ce z het]osexual disappo9tm5t or repression1 has be5 s emphasiz$ z to r5d] _! p]v]sion di/9ct f natural developm5ts1 & :o refuse1 or are unable1 to d5y !mselves physical gratification4 ,if we dissociate ! true homosexual f ?is class1 & conc5trate our att5tion only on ! celibate species ( su* atta*m5ts1 x is evid5t t we are 9 ! pres5ce1 n m]ely ( some?+ :i* is n crim9al1 b ( an ideal :i* is sacr$ 9 "*4 ,pure love1 especially s int5se a love z ! homog5ic atta*m5t1 is n pr(ane b div9e4 ,& ?\gh ! ,*ur* may be unable to recognize x by h] sacram5tal b5$iction1 because1 unlike m>riage1 x _c effect physical procreation1 %e possesses su* ,biblical prec$5ts z ! /ory ( ,david & ,jona?an--an episode :i* is obvi\sly homosexual 9 ! s5se t x describes n a platonic companion%ip b a romantic passion4 ,9 ! social sph]e also1 ! place ( ?is aspect ( homosexuality is obvi\s4 ,! homosexual mu/1 & does 9 fact1 exi/ 9 ! mo/ hon\r$ (fices ( ! community4 ,inde$1 x is no exagg]ation to decl>e t few m5 c be successful 9 educational or philan?ropic "w unless !y h "s homog5ic temp]am5t 9 _! nature4 ,)\t ?is !y may compel discipl9e b !y are p[]less to attract sympa!tic co-op]ation4 ,! te/imony 9 fav\r ( ?is ass]tion is ov]:elm+4 ,b :5 we admit t sex t5ds to f9d a physical expression1 & we come !re=e face to face ) ! physical problem1 ! difficulty ,i admit to be consid]able4 ,& ,i c only re-emphasize t ?is feature is num]ically & pot5tially ! lea/ important1 b t !re c be no religi\s c\nt5ance = any physical sex-act outside ! sacram5t ( matrimony4 99 99 99 99 99 ,rape1 & s$uction )\t cons5t1 are obvi\sly evils call+ = legal prosecution1 z be+ an infr+em5t ( p]sonal lib]ty4 ,& 9 ?is connexion x mu/ be rememb]$ t homosexual practices t5d to s$uction1 inasmu* z ! attraction is frequ5tly t[>ds ^? :o h n atta9$ intellectual manhood4 ,= ! re/1 ,i am incl9$ only to re-affirm ! g5]al pr9ciple :i* ,i h already attempt$ to def9e--namely1 t sex becomes a s9 :]e ! ma9 objective becomes ! physical gratification4 ,once ! proportion is weigh$ on ! side ( physical expression1 love is pro/itut$4 ,! purity ( true love is kn[n by ! fact t its face is turn$ n to m]e physical functions1 b beyond ! emotional & ev5 m5tal1 to ! spiritual ideal4 ,inde$1 a lov]1 :atev] 8 temp]am5t happ5s to be1 loves ev5 if 8 belov$ is remov$ f all physical rea*4 ,t is ! te/4 ,i d n look = salvation to ! arms ( m]e crim9al legislation4 ,?is seems to me to be almo/ p[]less z a moral =ce1 & inde$1 to enc\rage ! hide\s app>atus ( blackmail4#ah ,gradual & uns5sational z x may be1 ,i believe t morals c only be improv$ by educational & religi\s influ5ces4 ,& s f> z !oretical solutions are conc]n$ ,i believe t ,mr4 ,edw>d ,c>p5t]#ai comes ne>e/ to ! tru?4 ,nature is delib]ate 9 creat+ n uni=mity b v>iety1 & ,i d\bt if ! _w w\ld cont9ue if !re 7 only normal m5 9 x4 ,! homosexual has 8 place1 )9 re/rictions1 z has ! celibate or ! sexless type4 ,! real tru?1 ,i feel to be1 is t few m5 are :olly mascul9e or wom5 fem99e1 & t some:]e1 9 comp>ative degrees1 homosexuality is 9 u all4 ,x may become s excessive z to be a disease1 or s feeble z to create t unae/hetic1 b\rgeoise type1 :i* is an unpleasant symptom ( sup]-normality4 ,we ent] ! realm ( pure conjecture if we attempt to inquire ! purpose = :i* ?is type has be5 delib]ately creat$4 ,& ,i c only record my own entirely unproveable1 b def9ite op9ion1 t ! human race1 9 ! f> ages ahead1 w return1 by a spiral process1 to ! bisexual species f :i* ,i believe x has come4 ,if ?is is s1 ! homosexual is app>5tly a prototype1 a prelim9>y attempt ( nature to comb9e bo? sex-natures 9 "o individual4 ,& ) all 8 pres5t imp]fections1 ,i believe t !re are evid5ces :i* g /rongly to support ?is conjecture4 ,*apt] #i3 ,! ,sexless ,class ,!re is little t ne$ be writt5 on ?is subject1 n because x is devoid ( int]e/1 b because x raises no vital sex problem4 ,! numb] ( sexless p is small1 ?\gh app>5tly increas+4 ,x may be que/ion$ :e!r !re are any really sexless p--individuals1 i4e4 ^: sex-nature is non-exi/5t4 ,probably 9 mo/ ( ^! cases sex1 = "s reason or o!r1 is !re1 dormant b positive4 ,b x is conv5i5t s to classify ^? 9 :om1 = "s reason1 ! sex-=ce has nev] yet be5 /irr$4 ,x mu/ be rememb]$ t ?is class is q di/9ct f ! religi\s celibate4 ,! celibate has all ! sexual ard\r = 8 religi\s or humanit>ian devotion4 ,! sexless man or woman is cold1 intellectually alo(1 & g5]ally critical4 ,!re are only two consid]ations call+ = rem>ks on ?is int]e/+ psy*ological problem4 ,! fir/ is t we mu/ n all[ ! great body ( normal op9ion to label su* p z unnatural1 & z hav+ no "p to play 9 ! community4 ,!y h1 on ! contr>y1 an important role4 ,_! intellectual ability is 9 itself a great asset1 p>ticul>ly 9 ab/ract & critical directions4 ,& 9 all sex que/ions !y %\ld1 & frequ5tly h1 an imp>tial outlook1 = ! v reason t !y c view sex f a deta*$ /&po9t4 ,b1 conv]sely--& ?is is ! second consid]ation--!y possess ! immoral t5d5cy ( reg>d+ sex ) abhorr5ce1 especially :5 !y confuse sex ) m]e physical expression4 ,9 extreme cases ! sexless individual has be5 kn[n ev5 to fa9t or exhibit symptoms ( nausea at ! *ance t\* ( a woman4 ,?is is obvi\sly to magnify ! physical side out ( all clean proportion4 ,& probably su* cases %[ !mselves to be ! result ( artificial repression & consequ5t complex4 ,x may be argu$ f ?is t all deviations f ! normal are ! results ( repression4 ,b1 z we h se51 ! diff]5ce betwe5 natural & unnatural is comp>ative1 & mo/ ( our nature is built up1 9 ! fir/ in/ance1 by e>ly ext]ior influ5ces4 ,*apt] #aj3 ,sup]-,abnormalities ,"u ?is head ,i h includ$ a numb] ( *>act]i/ics1 :i* h no connective be>+ ^u "o ano!r4 ,x seem$ ! mo/ conv5i5t classification4 ,p]haps x w be be/ to take z ! fir/ example a sex t5d5cy :i* c h>dly be describ$ z sup]-abnormal1 = among s+le m51 & especially among boys1 x is extremely common4 ,auto-eroticism 9 ! =m ( self-abuse is n an easy problem to tackle4 ,! usual policy adopt$ t[>ds boys is mo/ immoral4 ,well-mean+ b hopelessly vici\s puri/s1 write t]rify+ pamphlets or deliv] lectures 9 :i* !y decl>e t ?is practice w inevitably lead to lunacy1 p>alysis or ev5 dea?4 ,! result is t ! boy is sc>$ into an ineffectual attempt at repression1 :i*1 s f> z x is successful1 sets ! sex-impulse at "w into morose *annels & makes him a li> or a ?ief4 ,or he may be impell$ to inquire = himself4 ,he f9ds t1 s long z self-abuse occurs infrequ5tly1 x does n br+ ab\t ^! dire evils1 & accord+ly he assumes t all moral doctr9e is hypocrisy & (t5 falls into ! opposite extreme ( con/ant self-abuse1 ) ! result t actual physical & m5tal det]ioration sets 94 ,:at is really ! tru?8 ,! fir/ consid]ation is t frequ5t & unregulat$ abuse does cause physical h>m4 ,! m>g9 ( frequ5cy :i* w escape ?is h>m v>ies ) ! individual4 ,b1 ) gr[+ boys1 ! practice is p]haps m dang]\s ?an aft] physical maturity4 ,! :ole res]ve ( ! physical con/itution appe>s to be ne$$ :ile ! body is develop+4 ,! difficulty ( ?is problem is its complications4 ,!re are sev]al entirely conflict+ influ5ces :i* mu/ be weigh$ "o aga9/ ! o!r4 ,we h se5 ! physical dang]1 &1 s9ce morality mu/ n be f\nd$ on a lie1 we mu/ freely admit t ! physical dang] may be elim9at$ by limit+ ! frequ5cy ( ! practice4 ,x may !n be physically h>mless4 ,!re rema91 h[ev]1 at lea/ two causes :i* make = a misuse ( ! sex-=ce1 t is--= immorality4 ,! fir/ is t x is usually ! result ( m5tal weakness1 %e] inability to ov]come ! incl9ation4 ,! m9d1 ! w1 mu/ be supreme 9 its own h\se4 ,until t is done little else matt]s4 ,& x comes1 !re=e1 to ?is1 s f> z ?is p>ticul> consid]ation is conc]n$1 t x is bett] = a man delib]ately to regulate himself by programme to c]ta9 times1 ?an to keep up an ineffectual /ruggle1 or to obey :5ev] ! incl9ation arises4 ,=1 9 bo? ^! cases1 remorse foll[s4 ,& ?is is z great an evil z ! failure ( w2 inde$1 x is failure ( w4 ,remorse is n p5it5ce4 ,x is useless !reby to regret :at has be5 done4 ,a man mu/ simply own to himself t he has fail$1 make a resolution to be /rong] next "t1 & !n sweep ! recollection f 8 m9d1 swit*+ (f on to o!r m5tal *annels4 ,! second influ5ce :i* makes = impurity is t by ?is practice ! sex-=ce becomes lit]ally selfi%4 ,n[1 sex is fundam5tally a movem5t t[>ds union ?r\gh love1 :e!r x be physical or sup]-physical4 ,?is practice is m]ely a vici\s circle1 9 :i* ! love elem5t1 save 9 ! p]v]t$ =m ( n>cissism1 is abs5t4 ,accord+ly1 !re mu/1 almo/ always1 be evil m5tal results f ?is abuse4 ,&1 once aga91 we see t ! real evil is n 9 ! physical act b 9 ! realm ( ?\ght1 :e!r ! act occurs or n4 ,on ! o!r h&1 we mu/ n become su* ab/ract morali/s z to d5y t 9 _m individuals ! sex-=ce is s /rong z to press almo/ irresi/ibly t[>ds physical expression4 ,ev5 dreams1 :i* are ! normal outlet1 may n be suffici5t4 ,a man :o = "s reason1 _c m>ry1 w !re=e argue t 8 only alt]native is rec\rse to pro/itution1 & t self-abuse1 s long z x is regulat$1 is morally pref]able4 ,"o rem$y is1 z we h already se51 ! transf] ( ! sex-=ce to high] *annels1 s t all ! gl[ & en]gy ( sex is en]giz$ 9 devotion to a gr\p ( p]sons1 or to a religi\s or humanit>ian ideal 9 concrete lab\r4 ,= sex is prim>ily creative1 & if x is n creat+ physical *ildr5 x may h1 & %\ld h1 a spiritual prog5y--z 9 art & lit]ature4 ,! tru? is t ea* individual case mu/ be treat$ accord+ to its p>ticul> /ate ( developm5t4 ,g5]al rules 9 ?is in/ance are p>ticul>ly dang]\s4 ,we c only repeat t ! repression is worse ?an commission1 t a see?+ mass ( sexual ?\ght is worse :5 x has no physical outlet2 t ! ideal1 :5 !re may be no legitimate outlet--&1 inde$1 to "s ext5t1 9 all cases--is to f9d an emotional outlet1 to dig ?\ght & emotional *annels along :i* ! sex-=ce may fl[1 b ! physical expression ( :i* is1 9 ! ord9>y s5se ( ! t]m1 non-sexual4#bj ,& ?is is q possible4 ,,ii ,attraction t[>ds "y *ildr5 is frequ5tly1 p]haps almo/ entirely1 sexual4 ,a symptom ( ?is temp]am5t is t romantic atta*m5ts are =m$ t[>ds ei!r sex1 because1 be=e pub]ty1 ! *ild is bisexual or sexless4 ,?is mu/ ess5tially be a cult2 x is a clean & noble cult1 b ! p5alty ( its high /&>d is t "h all physical sex expression mu/ be d5i$ except 9 ! less] =m ( embrace4 ,"h1 inde$1 ! prosecution ( ! law aga9/ sex-acts is ju/ifi$4 ,=1 n only is ! *ild incapable ( giv+ valid cons5t1 b ! commission ( ! sex-act is physically & morally injuri\s4 ,x is physically injuri\s beyond all d\bt at a "y age1 & x is morally injuri\s1 because x introduces sex to an age ( developm5t :5 ! consci\sness ( sex %\ld n h appe>$ above ! horizon4 ,! inevitable result is t if sex-acts take place ! *ild ev5tually ages rapidly1 z c be se5 among ! *ild-mo!rs ( ,india4 ,maturity is induc$ f> be=e its "t4 ,! sex consci\sness1 z di/9ct f ! unconsci\sness1 c be awak5$ 9 ! e>lie/ ye>s ( *ildhood4 ,! "y boy or girl (t5 %[s an extraord9>ily intuitive p]ception t !re is a sexual design beh9d ev5 ! app>5tly h>mless ov]tures4 ,& ?is is :y ?is cult is p>ticul>ly dang]\s4 ,! lov]1 9 fact1 mu/ n only entirely elim9ate ! morally crim9al sex incl9ations1 b he mu/ take c>e n to become s s5tim5tal & romantic z really to sugge/ sex to ! *ild's unconsci\sness4 ,x is difficult to draw ! l9e z to :at is a lawful & :at is an unlawful expression ( ?is sex-temp]am5t4 ,"o c only say t ! rem$y is n to conc5trate love on "o *ild1 b on *ildr5 g5]ally4 ,! *ild mu/ n be treat$ z an adult2 !re mu/ be no manife/ations ( jeal\sy1 or insi/5ce on a return ( love expression4 ,! embrace ( *ildr5 mu/ be natural b n too ard5t4 ,9 fact1 ! lov] mu/ diffuse 8 love & romp ) *ildr5 z a class r ?an all[ himself to appe> emotional ov] "o individual4 ,_m un?9k+ p w at once reg>d ?is temp]am5t z impure :5 !y h be5 conv9c$ t sci5tifically x is sexual4 ,b ?is is only because !y _c und]/& t sex is a clean ?+ & t ! physical side ( x is an occasional & by no means an inevitable incid5t4 ,! cult ( *ild-love is 9 fact "o ( ! pure/ & noble/ ( sex-expressions4 ,b x is a difficult pa?1 & he :o treads x mu/ bew>e ( _m pitfalls4 ,aga91 ,i q d5y t x is due to ?w>t$ pat]nal in/9ct4 ,i believe x to be z natural a v>iety z any o!r ( ! sex-temp]am5ts4 ,we h suff]$ too long f ! sup]/ition t sex is a uni=mity ( type4 ,,iii ,!n !re is t /range =m ( sex-expression kn[n z be/iality4 ,to mo/ ( u ! connexion betwe5 man & bea/ 9 sex is s revolt+ t !re is a great dang] ( our prejudice runn+ away ) u4 ,i believe t prejudice aga9/ :at seems to me s debas$ a vice1 is ju/ifiable4 ,b ,i am equally sure t to puni% su* (f5ces by crim9al law has no %r$ ( ju/ification1 except :5 ! act is done 9 public s z to be op5ly indec5t4 ,no physical or moral h>m c be done to ! animal4 ,& 7 x n tragic1 ! idea ( s5t5c+ ! (f5d]s to p5al s]vitude w\ld be itself a trave/y4 ,! practice1 :i* is n s uncommon z _m p imag9e1 is n s mu* immoral z unnatural4 ,i mean t ?is c h>dly ev] be a v>iety ( sex-temp]am5t4 ,al?\gh ! love ( wom5 = pet dogs is probably a =m ( p]v]t$ sex-outlet1 x seems impossible to discov] "h any actual love go+ out t[>ds animals r ?an to humans4 ,!re=e1 ! act is almo/ always due to a desire = m]e physical expression1 :5 ?is happ5s to h be5 *os5 z ! mo/ conv5i5t4 ,! true rem$y1 !re=e1 c only be to take ! individual & educate him4 ,he mu/ be %[n t x is immoral = man to devolve back to ! animal level4 ,he is sup]ior to ! bea/4 ,he mu/ be rem9d$ t sex mu/ be a result ( love1 & t sex-love betwe5 man & animal w\ld only be possible if x 7 moral = man to cease to reason1 to g d[n on all f\rs1 & to eat & dr9k & live l an animal4 ,ev5 ! mo/ primitive man w\ld n wi% to d t4 ,& if he feels any s5se ( abhorr5ce at su* a proposal1 !n he mu/ le>n to ext5d 8 abhorr5ce to any attempt at a simil> equality 9 sex4 ,,iv ,! /range & almo/ endless =ms ( sex-association ne$ n be consid]$1 s9ce !y h no moral problem ( _! own4 ,! man ^: sex-=ce is /irr$ into en]gy by ! sight ( "s inanimate physical object is obvi\sly ! victim ( a sex-repression4 ,& su* diseases mu/ be treat$ z any o!r repressions %\ld be4 ,^! g5]al consid]ations mu/ suffice "h = all =ms ( sex p]v]sions1 su* z sadism & its conv]se4 ,& x is n difficult to di/+ui% betwe5 ! unnaturalness ( su* practices & ! natural "* ( ! ma9 sex-types :i* we h already m5tion$4 ,*apt] ,,xi3 ,sex ,education ,x is becom+ evid5t to all /ud5ts ( ! sex-problem t ! rem$y = _m ( ! difficulties aris+ !refrom is a :olesome & effici5t sex-education4 ,9 _m cases ! p>5ts are n ! p]sons mo/ fitt$ to give ?is education4 ,!y may n possess ! art ( imp>t+ k1 & (t5 !re is a c]ta9 retic5ce betwe5 p>5t & *ild1 :i* :5 pres5t creates a b> to ! prop] h&l+ ( ?is "q4 ,! *ild goes to s*ool to le>n1 & ! s*ool mu/ take its %>e ( ?is responsibility4 ,:]e ?is is n done ! effect is deplorable4 ,9 ! prep>atory s*ool sex has h>dly appe>$4 ,b 9 any s*ool :]e !re are old] boys or girls1 & :]e sex-education is n giv51 k is rapidly obta9$4 ,(ficially sex is ignor$ until1 on r>e occasions1 x is detect$4 ,sev]e puni%m5t is !n met$ out1 & p]haps ! (f5d] is ev5 expell$1 al?\gh ! s*ool is really p5aliz+ ! results ( its own sy/em4 ,x is unnecess>y to lab\r ! apology t ! abs5ce ( sex-education ensures innoc5ce4 ,9 no s*ool is ?is ! case4 ,if x 71 ) gr[+ boys & girls1 x w\ld be unnatural4 ,sex-in/9ct is b\nd to gr[ z ! physical body gr[s1 & to ignore ?is fact is to create ! conception t sex-in/9ct is immoral4 ,we !n obta9 ! usual attitude adopt$ 9 public s*ools--t sex is to be indulg$ beh9d clos$ doors & sex lit]ature snigg]$ at 9 d>k corn]s4 ,! boy gr[s up ) a totally unclean view ( sex4 ,he becomes ei!r an intol]able prude1 or else he approa*es sex-exp]i5ce ) an entirely twi/$ conception ( sex-morality4 ,"o is cont9ually meet+ in/ances ( ?is p]v]t$ imag9ation4 ,n only boys1 b m51 w reg>d an outspok5 book on sex1 p]haps writt5 ) ! pure/ ( motives1 z hot /uff1 some?+ to be gre$ily dev\r$ :5 ! eye ( respectable au?ority is conv5i5tly remov$4 ,rec5tly1 a man 0 told t a c]ta9 cl]gyman 0 a memb] ( a gr\p ( /ud5ts /udy+ sex-psy*ology4 ,he express$ ! op9ion1 ) a kn[+ le]1 t "s p>sons are n su* fools aft] all4 ,^! crude examples ( ! result ( driv+ sex into a d>k corn] exactly repres5t :at "o is up aga9/ 9 s*ool1 & 9 ! _w1 :5 "o beg9s to deal ) sex op5ly & cleanly z a natural & non-repressible in/9ct4 ,really ^! p are a type ( prude1 mu* z !y w\ld res5t ?is classification1 = !y p]si/ 9 reg>d+ sex z some?+ :i* is r naughty4 ,!y ev5 imag9e t to take away f x ! cloak ( unnaturalness ) :i* !y h surr\nd$ x is to rob x ( all its attraction4 ,?is is ridicul\sly untrue4 ,sex is attractive because x is romantic1 &1 s long z "o does n g to ! opposite extreme ( reg>d+ x m]ely ?r\gh ! mu/y glasses ( sci5tific classification1 x becomes no less attractive :5 x is op5 & natural1 & ceases to be ! cause ( giggl+ asides4 ,be=e any moral s5se 9 ! sex-problem c be e/abli%$ !re mu/ be a fundam5tal clean+ ( ?is cess-pool1 ?is /range m$ley ( (ficial sil5ce1 unnatural repression1 & unclean secretiv5ess4 ,! ma9 road to a moral s5se is sex-education4 ,& x is necess>y1 !re=e1 to conclude ?is outl9e ( pr9ciples by sugge/+ "s conditions :i* %\ld gov]n su* in/ruction4 ,x is obvi\s t sex-education mu/ be advanc$ on ! process ( a slid+ scale4 ,be=e pub]ty sex %\ld n appe> on ! horizon ( ! *ild's consci\sness4 ,! precoci\s *ild mu/ ( c\rse be specially dealt )1 b usually ! fir/ lessons 9 sex %\ld comm5ce ) ! p]iod ( m5tal pub]ty4 ,be=e t "t ! small *ild jokes only ab\t ! normal excretory functions1 & ?is c be adju/$ by emphasiz+ ! unmanly & unnecess>y "* ( su* =ms ( hum\r4 ,a *ild has usually an exagg]at$ impression ( ! value ( ! adult /&>d1 an impression :i* x mu/ be confess$ is too (t5 subject to subsequ5t disillusionm5t4 ,:ile x rema9s1 h[ev]1 x c be us$1 & x c be po9t$ out t gr[n-ups d n consid] ! excretory sy/em has any m claim to ridicule ?an ! process ( dige/ion or sleep4 ,vulg>ity & co>s5ess are n symptoms ev5 ( immoral sexuality4 ,! problem comm5ces1 !n1 ) pub]ty4 ,& "h a w>n+ %\ld be utt]$ aga9/ t s*ool ( re=m]s :i* t5ds to ! view t sex c be reg>d$ z naturally & z publicly z natural hi/ory or *emi/ry4 ,?is attitude ignores ! fact t !re is su* a quality z sexual appetite4 ,& consequ5tly1 sex education %\ld be r a matt] = individuals ?an = public in/ruction4 ,we h rem>k$ t ! p>5t may n infrequ5tly be an un=tunate educator4 ,b :]e ^! objections d n arise1 ! home is an admirable atmosph]e = s5sible tea*+4 ,! ,ca?olic ,*ur* possesses ! invaluable m$ium ( ! ,confessional1 & :]e ! ,confessor c give s\nd sex in/ruction no bett] opportunity c be imag9$4 ,!re rema9s ! s*ool1 b ev5 "h bett] "w w be done 9 ! /udy ?an ! classroom4 ,! imm$iate problem 9 ! e>ly po/-pub]ty age is ! t5d5cy t[>ds solit>y practices4 ,x mu/ be recogniz$ t ?is is usual ) all *ildr51 & t !re is no evid5ce to %[ t1 save 9 extreme exceptions1 physical h>m results4 ,all attempt at al>mi/ prudism mu/ be ab&on$4 ,sane in/ruction w t5d r to emphasize t sex abuse is due to a weakness ( w-p[]1 & t man is mo/ manly1 i4e4 mo/ remov$ f ! animal1 9 ! ex]cise ( w-p[]4 ,all education %\ld conta9 t subject :i* is at pres5t consi/5tly ignor$1 namely1 ! art ( ?\ght-control4 ,! *ild w be int]e/$ to foll[ c]ta9 simple rules ( m5tal ex]cise1 & :]e ?is is foll[$ ! liability to indulge 9 sex-acts dim9i%es4 ,x is ?is elem5t :i* mu/ be emphasiz$1 ! fact1 t is1 t solit>y practices are usually ! result ( an inability to ex]cise ! w & control ! m9d4 ,at a slightly lat] p]iod1 ! public-s*ool age1 !re em]ges ! t5d5cy1 9 addition to onanism1 = promiscu\s practices1 usually ( a homog5ic nature4 ,a fur!r /age ( sex-education mu/ n[ be op5$ out1 namely ! pr9ciple t physical sex expression mu/ be ! expression only ( love4 ,! problem n[ becomes necess>ily m acute1 b !re is ?is elem5t :i* t5ds to less5 ! difficulties ( ! in/ructor's task4 ,! individual is always int]e/$ ab\t himself2 he is naturally egoti/ical4 ,! y\? w gladly li/5 to :at c be told him ( 8 own nature4 ,he mu/ be %[n ! imm5se sup]iority ( m9d bo? ov] ! emotional & physical natures4 ,?is may involve a slight de?ronem5t ( ! public s*ool appreciation ( sport4 ,s long z x is slight su* a de?ronem5t w be a re=m 9 itself4 ,! boy 9 8 middle te5s mu/ be taught t man is great] 9 8 m5tal ?an 9 8 physical activity2 he mu/ be rem9d$ t he is inf]ior to _m animals on ! physical level4 ,! application ( ?is doctr9e to sex is t sex-expression = ! purpose ( physical curiosity or excitem5t is a d5ial ( ! monopoly ( love1 :i* belongs to ! emotional & m5tal capacities4 ,! "y man & ! girl1 :o has left s*ool1 w be ready to receive ! :ole /&>d ( sex-morality z has be5 outl9$ 9 ?is manual4 ,! *ief tr\ble n[ becomes ov]-s5tim5tality1 ! t5d5cy to develop emotionally at ! exp5se ( ! m9d4 ,& x becomes1 !re=e1 ess5tial to rem9d ! pupil t :]e !re are cont9ual pass+ & promiscu\s sexual or love affairs1 ! m9d is be+ %ut out f its natural functions4 ,to be attract$ sexually t[>ds any pretty girl1 to develop sexual relations ) diff]5t wom5 f week to week1 is simply a =m ( m5tal unbalance4 ,! emotions are 9 ! saddle4 ,= directly ! m9d beg9s to op]ate !re is introduc$ ! elem5t ( p]man5cy & con/ancy4 ,! deepe/ & mo/ real pleasures only beg9 9 ! realm ( m5tality4 ,! man :o he>s music only to beat "t or rememb] a cat*y tune is %ut out ( ! imm5se joy ( ! intellectual love ( music4 ,s ! "y man :o lives 9 a fev] ( hot-h\se sexuality1 ( absorb+ intrigues 9 ! dance-room1 or ! morbid atmosph]e ( ! /reet corn]1 is %ut out ( all ! exquisite joys ( love4 ,he does n "k ?is1 any m ?an ! irreligi\s man kn[s :at he loses ?r\gh an abs5ce ( ! spiritual s5se4 ,b he mu/ be told4 ,! basic pr9ciple ( sex values is t sex is immoral s f> z ! physical side outweighs 9 proportion ! emotional & m5tal--s f> inde$1 z ! act becomes ! motive & n ! incid5t4 ,sex may be d$icat$ only to love2 divorc$ f love1 x is an abuse4 ,!re c be no exceptions to ?is rule1 & we c only cl>ify our ideas z to :at is & :at is n love4 ,p]haps ?is maxim1 :i* we le>n by gradual exp]i5ce1 w help u4 ,sex passion quickly burns itself out4 ,! pleasures d]iv$ f passion w be ( a purely tempor>y nature1 )\t ! satisfaction :i* alone comes f p]man5ce4 ,all physical ?+s are less p]man5t ?an ! m5tal4 ,!re is no joy1 no div9e nature 9 sex1 save :]e f ! a%es ( passion rises ! pho5ix ( ! sexual b ! sup]-passionate atta*m5t4 ,& ?is p]man5t possession c only come1 :e!r 9 m>riage or outside1 :]e ! m9d1 heal?ily develop$ & ex]cis$1 is tak+ its true place 9 ! expression ( pure love4 ,pr9t$ 9 ,great ,brita9 by ,hazell1 ,watson ,v9ey1 ,ld41 ,london & ,aylesbury4 ,footnotes3 #a ,! ,orig9 ( ,sexual ,mode/y1 by ,edw>d ,we/]m>ck4 #b ,vide ,r4 ,v4 ,jellyman 7#ahch7 #h ,c & ,p1 #fjd4 #c ,until rec5tly ince/ 0 n a civil (f5ce4 #d ,! second object ( m>riage is decl>$ to be a rem$y aga9/ s94442 t su* p]sons z h n ! gift ( cont95cy m>ry & keep !mselves undefil$ memb]s ( ,*ri/'s body4 #e #a ,cor4 vii4 #h1 #i4 ,burn means sex-obsession z m5tion$ on page #ch4 #f ,:]e ! decree ,tametsi ( ! ,c\ncil ( ,tr5t has n be5 proclaim$1 m>riage is con/itut$ by m]e cons5t freely ex*ang$ betwe5 p]sons :o are by natural & canonical law compet5t & able to int]m>ry4--,ge>y's ,m>riage & ,family ,relations4 7,n[ alt]$ by ,ne tem]e-decree1 b ! pr9ciple rema9s47 #g ,we h already comm5t$ on ! /range inconsi/5cy ( reg>d+ ! sex-act z evil p] se outside m>riage1 & z a virtue 9 m>riage4 #h ,i am us+ celibacy to imply complete physical *a/ity4 #i ,) ! curi\s inconsi/5cy1 already ref]r$ to1 t 9 m>riage non-celibacy is a virtue4 #aj ,except by ,act ( ,p>liam5t4 #aa ,! ,majority ,report ( ! ,divorce ,commission is a good in/ance ( ! unnecess>y h>d%ip :i* results f half-he>t$ proposals ( ?is k9d4 ,divorce is to be all[$1 = example1 aft] des]tion = ?ree ye>s2 :y n = two8 ,or aga91 ! wife ( an incurable drunk>d is to be free to obta9 divorce1 :ile ! unhappy wife ( a man :o suff]s f viol5t fits ( int]mitt5t drunk5ness is to be d5i$ ?is relief4 #ab ,i refra9 f add+ economic reasons1 = ,i believe t ! ,/ate %\ld remove1 z f> z possible1 all su* ob/acles aga9/ heal?y p>5ts begett+ *ildr54 #ac ,procuration = ! purpose ( pro/itution is ( c\rse an entirely diff]5t matt]4 #ad ,no actual physical h>m ne$ result f an ince/u\s union4 ,! only effect :i* seems to be caus$ is t ! *>act]i/ics to be h]$it>ily transmitt$ are d\bl$4 ,?us ) only a small gra9 ( insanity 9 a family ! *ances ( aggravat$ insanity appe>+ 9 ! (fspr+ ( a bro!r & si/] w\ld be consid]able4 #ae ,spiritual aff9ity 0 a b>1 s t n only c\ld n godp>5ts m>ry ea* o!r1 b !re c\ld be no valid unions betwe5 a godp>5t & ! *ild's fa!r or "m4 7,ge>y's ,m>riage & ,family ,relations47 #af ,"s apology mu/ be made = ! use ( ?is hybrid t]m4 ,! unw>rantable confusion ( ,greek & ,lat9 t]m9ology mu/1 h[ev]1 be laid at ! door ( popul> use4 #ag ,psy*ology ( ,sex2 ,vol4 ,sexual ,inv]sion4 ,dr4 ,hirs*feld 9 8 ,/ati/is*5 ,vat]su*unge ueb] d5 ,proz5t5setz d] ,homosexuell51 consid]s t out ( #ajj1jjj inhabitants1 #id1fjj on ! av]age are sexually normal1 #a1ejj exclusively homosexual1 & #c1ijj bisexual4 #ah ,! exi/5ce ( ?is dang] 0 admitt$ 9 a debate 9 ! ,h\se ( ,lords on ,augu/ #ae1 #aiba1 on ,! ,crim9al ,law ,am5dm5t ,bill4 ,! ,e>l ( ,malmesbury1 speak+ on a proposal to apply crim9al prosecution to homosexual (f5ces among wom51 decl>$ t ! opportunity = blackmail w be va/ly & enorm\sly increas$4 ,o!r speak]s concurr$ 9 ?is view1 & x 0 p>tly on ?is gr\nd t ! proposal 0 ?r[n out4 ,x is h>dly necess>y to po9t out t if blackmail w\ld be enc\rag$ by su* legislation1 x mu/ equally be enc\rag$ by ! pres5t law reg>d+ simil> (f5ces betwe5 males4 #ai ,! ,int]m$iate ,sex4 #bj ,i _c ent] "h into t fur!r !ory :i* may be describ$ z expression ?r\gh a phantasy4