,,the ,,morality ,,of ,,woman ,,and ,,other ,,essays ,,authorized ,,translation ,,from ,,the ,,swedish ,,of ,,ellen ,,key ,,by ,,mamah ,,bouton ,,borthwick ,illustration ,,the ,,ralph ,,fletcher ,,seymour ,,co4 ,,fine ,,arts ,,building ,,chicago ,,copyright1 #aiaa ,,by ,,the ,,ralph ,,fletcher ,,seymour ,,co4 ,,chicago ,,contents ,,the ,,morality ,,of ,,woman page #e ,,the ,,woman ,,of ,,the ,,future #ci ,,the ,,conventional ,,woman #ea ,,the ,,morality ,,of ,,woman 7,,translated ,,from ,,the ,,swedish7 ,the law condemns to be hung those who counterfeit banknotes2 a measure necessary for the public welfare4 ,but he who counterfeits love1 that is to say3 he who1 for a thousand other reasons but not for love1 unites himself to one whom he does not love and creates thus a family circle unworthy of that name--does not he indeed commit a crime whose extent and incalculable results in the present and in the future1 disseminate far more terrible unhappiness than the counterfeiting of millions of banknotes6 ,c4 ,j4 ,l4 ,,almquist4 ,the simplest formula for the new conception of morality1 which is beginning to be opposed to moral dogma still esteemed by all society1 but especially by women1 might be summed up in these words3 ,love is moral even without legal marriage1 but marriage is immoral without love4 ,the customary objection to this tenet is that those who propose it forget all other ethical duties and legitimate feelings in order to make the sex relationship the center of existence1 and love the sole decisive point of view in questions concerning this relationship4 ,but if we except the struggle for existence--which indeed must be called not a relationship of life but a condition of life--what then can be more central for man1 than a condition decreed by the laws of earthly life--the cause of his own origin8 ,can one imagine a moment which penetrates more deeply his whole being8 ,that many men live content without the happiness of love1 that others after they attain it seek a new end for their activity1 proves nothing against the truth of the experience that for men in general the erotic relation between man and woman becomes the deepest life determining factor1 whether negatively1 because they are deprived of this relation or because they formed it unhappily2 or positively1 because they have found therein the fullness of life4 ,the depreciation for mankind of the significance of the sex relation and of the significance of love in the sex relation brings into it all the immorality still imposed by conventionalism as morality4 ,we no longer consider1 as in our mother's youth1 ignorance of the side of life which concerns the propagation of the race the essential condition of womanly purity4 ,but the conventional idea of purity still maintains that the untouched condition of the senses belongs to this conception4 ,and it would be right1 if the distinction were made between purity and chastity4 ,purity is the new-fallen snow which can be melted or sullied2 chastity is steel tempered in the fire by white heat4 ,for chastity is only developed together with complete love2 this not only excludes equally all partition among several but also makes a separation between the demands of the heart and the senses impossible4 ,the essence of chastity is1 according to ,george ,sand's profound words3 to be able never to betray the soul with the senses nor the senses with the soul 7de ne pouvoir jamais tromper ni l'ame avec les sens ni les sens avec l'ame74 ,and as absolute consecration is its distinctive mark1 so is it also its demand4 ,this alone is the chastity which must characterize the family life and form in the future the basis of foundation for the happiness of the people4 ,literature was1 therefore1 wholly justified when in the name of nature it attacked the hyperidealistic subtlety which raised the love of the heart to the highest rank and made that of the senses the lowest2 and when it desired that the woman should not only know what complete love was but that she should also when she loved desire that completeness4 ,because from time to time powerful voices were raised1 like ,george ,sand's or ,almquist's1 calling without consideration not only that marriage immoral which was consummated without mutual love but also that marriage immoral which was continued without mutual love--a purer consciousness has awakened in questions regarding the conditions of the genesis of the unborn race and elevated the conditions of the personal dignity of man and woman4 ,so eventually it will come to pass that no finely sensitive woman will become a mother except through mutual love2 that this motherhood sanctioned legally or not so sanctioned shall be considered the only true motherhood1 and every other motherhood untrue4 ,thus will mankind awaken to such a feeling of the ,sanctity of the generation1 and to such an understanding of the conditions of the health1 strength and beauty of the race1 that every marriage which has its source in worldly or merely sensual motives1 or in reasons of prudence or in a feeling of duty shall be considered as ,almquist calls it3 ,a criminal counterfeiting of the highest values of life4 ,and the same criminal counterfeit obtains in every married life which is continued under the compulsion1 the distaste or the resignation of one of the two4 ,man will be penetrated with the consciousness that the whole ethical conception which now in and with marriage gives to a husband or a wife rights over the personality of the other1 is a crude survival of the lower periods of culture2 that everything which is exchanged between husband and wife in their life together1 can only be the free gift of love1 can never be demanded by one or the other as a right4 ,man will understand that when one can no longer continue the life in love then this life must cease2 that all vows binding forever the life of feeling are a violence of one's personality1 since one cannot be held accountable for the transformation of one's feeling4 ,even though this new moral ideal should in the beginning dissolve many untrue marriages and thus cause much suffering1 yet all this suffering is necessary4 ,it belongs to the attainment of the new erotic ethics which will uplift man and woman in that sphere where now the spirit of slavery and of obtuseness under a holy name degrade them2 where social convention sanctions prostitution alongside monogamy1 and vouchsafes to the seducer but not to the seduced1 social esteem1 calling the unmarried woman ruined who in love has become a mother1 but the married woman respectable who without love gives children to the man who has bought her6 ,the erotic-ethical consciousness of mankind cannot be uplifted until the new idea of morality with all its consequences is clearly established4 ,this ideal has two types of adversary4 ,one is the adherent of the conventional morality2 the other the supporter of the transitory union to which the name of free love is erroneously applied4 ,those of the first type demand quite the same morality for the man as for the woman4 ,they assert that celibacy for either sex brings with it serious difficulties4 ,they maintain that the social feeling of duty1 not mutual love1 must be the ground of conjugal fidelity4 ,they call pure love love untouched by all that which they call sensuality4 ,these same moral dogmas in recent years have manifested themselves in the effort to quench all fire1 whiten all burning red coals1 and drape all nudity in literature and art4 ,the supporters of this dogma certainly understand--since1 to begin at the beginning they have surely glanced into the ,bible and ,homer--that the undertaking would be too vast were it to extend to classic literature4 ,but all the more ardently they have directed their zeal against modern literature and art4 ,and if they do not encounter energetic opposition the fig leaf will soon among us also attest the fall of taste and of the soul4 ,free love has also its fanatics who are guilty of quite as crass excess4 ,they have no conception of soulful and true devotion1 which they consider an absurdity or a conventionality under which human nature cannot bow without hypocrisy4 ,for since experience shows that lifelong love is frequently an illusion1 so1 they say1 one must not begin by expecting it6 ,the so-called ,bohemians have shown as great monomania in their rotation around this one point1 the right of the senses1 as have the zealots of traditional morality in their rotation around their point1 the suppression of the senses4 ,the extreme result of both would be retrogression to a lower degree of culture2 in one case to the asceticism of the ,middle ,ages1 in the other to the promiscuity of the savage4 ,both forget the reality of life4 ,on the one side they ignore this reality in their absolute demands without consideration of temperament or circumstances2 in their assertion of the unqualified moral superiority of woman and in depreciation of the significance of love for the full harmony of man and woman4 ,on the other side they ignore this reality when they try to make woman as unrestrained morally as man has hitherto been2 when they forget all the suffering of the new generation born and reared in such an unrestrained existence2 when they learn nothing of the nature of woman from the many younger and older women who live solitary and yet sound and useful lives in the deep conviction that1 since they have not found the great1 mutual love1 which decides existence1 any union with a man would be degrading and unhappy4 ,development has1 because of multifarious influences made entirety and continuity in love a greater life necessity for the woman of culture in general than for the man of the same intellectual level4 ,a man1 therefore1 ordinarily dissolves an erotic relation without bitterness when he has ceased to love1 while a woman1 even after her love has ceased1 often suffers because the relationship has not endured a lifetime4 ,it is this ever increasing peremptory demand for erotic completeness of the woman of developed individuality of the present time1 which causes her always to wish to more fervently cherish the personality of the man as entirely as it is her happiness and her pride to be able to give her own4 ,it is this demand for entirety which1 among ,germanic peoples1 at least1 makes woman neither desirous nor psychologically fitted for the so-called free love4 ,this is evidently to be concluded from the vicissitudes of those who have tried it4 ,free love is moreover quite as senseless an expression as legal love4 ,because no external command can call love into being or repress it2 it is in this sense always free1 yet as are all feelings1 it is bound by certain psychological laws4 ,if not1 then it does not deserve the name of love4 ,it is with love as with the human face3 though the individual varieties are infinite1 yet there are certain general characteristic features which make all these different faces human faces1 all these different feelings human love4 ,and in every time there is a type for both1 which is recognized as nobler than the others4 ,this noblest type of love has been portrayed by a ,danish writer1,a who endeavored to show that a conception of life founded upon evolution need not lead to laxity in sexual relations4 ,he shows how the erotic feeling1 as all other feelings1 has been developed from an incoherent1 indeterminate and indefinite condition to one more coherent1 determinate and differentiated1 and so from a simple instinct for reproduction of the species has been finally transformed to an entirely personal1 inner love4 ,the highest type of this love is that which exists between a man and a woman of the same moral and intellectual level2 which demands of necessity reciprocal love in order to be perfected1 and can therefore be contented with no other kind of reciprocal love than a corresponding erotic love4 ,this perfect love includes the yearning desire of both lovers to become entirely one being1 to free each other and to develop each other to the greatest perfection4 ,if love is perfected and consummated thus by the life together1 then can it be given to only one and only once in a lifetime4 ,this thought of the ,danish writer is expressed with the concise brevity of the poet1 by ,bjornson1 when he says of the sensation feeling oneself doubled in the beloved one3 ,that is love1 all else is not love4 ,this feeling which liberates1 conserves and deepens the personality1 which is the inspiration to noble deeds and works of genius1 is the opposite of the ephemeral1 merely sensual love1 which enslaves1 dissipates and lessens the personality4 ,a ,see ,viggo ,drewsen3 ,en ,livsanskuelse grundet paa ,elskow 7,a ,conception of ,life ,founded upon ,love7 and ,forholdet mellem ,maud og ,kvinde belyst gjennem ,udviklingshypothesen4 7,the ,relation between ,man and ,woman in the ,light of the ,hypothesis of ,evolution47 ,it is only the great love which has a higher right than all other feelings and which can establish its right in a life4 ,he who considers this love decisive for the morality of such an erotic union cannot believe that external ties are necessary to give ethical value to this union4 ,social considerations1 prudence and feeling for others can indeed in certain cases make the legal bond desirable4 ,but it can just as little give increased consecration to real love1 as it can give any consecration whatever to a relation in which this content is lacking4 ,and even if it would be too dogmatic to establish just the highest type of love as ethical norm for all relations between man and woman1 since life proves that the highest love is still as rare as the highest beauty1 yet it is on the contrary not premature to assert that this love1 legally sanctioned or not1 is moral1 and that where it is lacking on either side1 a moral ground is furnished for the dissolution of the relationship4 ,the ever clearer consciousness that love can dispense with marriage yet marriage cannot dispense with love1 is already partially recognized in modern society1 by the facility of divorce4 ,and it is only a question of time when the law which gives to one person the power to constrain the other to remain with him against his will1 will be abrogated1 so contrary is this possibility to that developed conception of the freedom of love--which is not at all the same as so-called free love6 ,it is not historically true that it was1 as has been asserted1 some certain conception of morality1 some certain form of concluding or dissolving marriage which1 in the last analysis1 has been a decisive factor in the progress or decadence of peoples4 ,among the ,jews as among the ,greeks1 among the ,romans as among our ,germanic forefathers1 at the most flourishing period1 there existed many laws and customs which were considered moral that the present time considers immoral4 ,the decisive thing for the sound life of these peoples was1 that that which they considered right had sovereign power to bind them3 the faithfulness to the conception of duty more than the content of conception determines the moral soundness of a people4 ,society is in danger1 not when the ideals are raised but when they are lost4 ,but a very highly developed historical sense is necessary to see at the same time the connection and the difference between dissolution and reorganization4 ,moreover it is necessary to have the large view of the essentials of life which distinguishes the true poet1 the view which ,sophocles possessed when he let his ,antigone follow the higher law of affection and commit a violation of the law which--according to the conception of that time--would lead to general license if it remained unpunished4 ,the new ideal of marriage is now being formed in and through all the many literary and personal dissensions in which it constitutes the theme4 ,yes1 it is formed also in the midst of all the conflicts of life for which marriage gives so much occasion4 ,it is true there are now married people who separate because from the very beginning they considered fidelity impossible and so did not even strive for it4 ,but many other divorces have far more complex1 psychological reasons4 ,when two people are married young1 personal development takes often entirely opposite directions2 if they have married in more mature years1 then their individual differences1 already strongly marked from the beginning1 make the problem of common life together difficult of solution4 ,the strongly developed sensibility of the modern individual to disposition1 nuances1 variations of humor1 makes a lack of sympathy still more unendurable2 a true sympathy a far greater source of joy4 ,the whole multiplicity of psycho-physical influences and impressions which the members of a family exercise upon one another for pleasure and displeasure1 sympathy and variance1 harmony and discord1 are now in all relationships1 but above all in marriage1 felt with greatest intensity4 ,it is in those natures most individually developed1 most refined1 for whom the nuances of the married life1 not its simple primal colors1 signify happiness or unhappiness4 ,to this general delicacy of feeling there is added especially the heightened sensibility of woman to the discord between that which she expected in marriage and that which in reality it offered her1 because the union often lacked the freedom1 the understanding which her sympathetic feeling now craves4 ,this lack of harmony is inevitable since the forms of marriage have not even approximately undergone the transformation which would correspond to the individual development of the two beings1 of the woman especially1 whom it unites4 ,but while all these reasons1 cursorily indicated here1 contribute their part in the increased number of divorces1 the life of finer feeling creates1 on the other hand1 an ever more intimate married life4 ,there are married people who have pledged each other at marriage full freedom to dissolve the union when either of them so wished1 and others who have never given legal form to their marriage yet realize fully and richly love in sorrow and in joy1 in sympathetic work together1 in reciprocal1 true devotion4 ,there have been1 on the other hand1 champions of so-called free love who were themselves by nature such pronounced believers in only one marriage that their life was wrecked when the one to whom they had bound themselves applied to their own case their own theories4 ,it is always the character which ultimately decides4 ,character can make the radical theorist a moral paragon and the pillar of society resting upon conservative ground a reed of passion2 it can make the advocate of egoism sublimely devoted and the apostle of ,christianity deeply egoistic in his love4 ,so many men1 so many souls2 so many souls1 so many destinies4 ,and to wish to apply to this whole1 complex1 manifold1 incalculable erotic life1 with its unfathomable depths1 an immutable ethical standard1 when judging the relationship between man and woman1 and to make this standard decisive also for the ethical value of the personality in other respects--is quite as naive as the attempt of a child to draw up in his little bucket the wonderful depth of the vast storm-driven sea4 ,love1 as life1 will fortunately remain an eternal mystery which no science will be able to penetrate and which reason cannot rule4 ,our only hope for the future is that man1 endowed with a more delicate sense1 will listen to the secrets of his own life4 ,a more highly developed and differentiated soul life will give him a surer instinct or a keener power of analysis which will prevent him from confounding a passing sentiment of sympathy1 need of tenderness or satisfaction of vanity with a love which decides existence4 ,now1 on the contrary1 many believe that a wave of admiration1 of gratitude1 or of pity is the whole sea2 that the reflection of the fire of another is the holy fire itself6 ,no one can with certainty predict the final result of the profound revolution of the feeling and of the customs which is now taking place4 ,but one thing appears certain3 the danger to the future of mankind can scarcely be that the new ideal will result in general license4 ,rather it will lead to so individual1 differentiated and refined love that erotic happiness will be increasingly difficult to find and the idealists of love will more frequently prefer celibacy to a compromise with their greater demands for sympathetic love4 ,the occasional experience1 often only the dream of such a love1 sensible to the finest shades of the soul1 to the most delicate vibrations of the senses--of a love which is an all comprehensive tenderness1 an all embracing intimacy--has already raised the erotic demands and the erotic existence of thousands of men and women to a sphere of more infinite longing1 more fervid chastity than that of their contemporaries4 ,it is this experience or this dream which has already begun to assume form in the art and literature of the present time4 ,it is true the extreme discord between the peculiar character of man and of woman has long been the favorite theme1 especially in modern literature4 ,but among the wild1 discordant tones a new leitmotiv resounds which will swell and rise and fill the void with a harmony1 still but faintly divined4 ,one of the conditions that this harmony become as perfect as possible is that woman in life as in literature shall begin to be more honest and man more eager to listen when she reveals to him something of her own nature4 ,men have desired and justly that women should learn from their confessions in regard to the conflict between man and woman4 ,but woman because of the conventional conception of womanly purity has been intimidated from conceding to man a deep insight into her erotic life experiences4 ,only when women begin to tell the truth about themselves will literature universally illuminate the still unknown depths of woman's erotic temperament4 ,to the present time it has been almost exclusively men poets who have made revelations about women4 ,the nearer these poets have approached life1 the more surely have they seen the highest expression of the eternal feminine as the great women poets also saw it3 in erotic love and in mother love4 ,and it was the completeness of her consecration which was in their eyes a woman's supreme chastity4 ,it is the great poets who have taught and have continued to teach youth to revere the all powerful ,eros4 ,this is the only morality which has a future4 ,only by conforming to this shall we gradually succeed in preventing the erotic feeling from appearing sometimes as a brutal instinct or marriage from being founded upon a fleeting attraction4 ,an ideal of negative purity--even incarnated in the person of ,jesus--cannot inflame youth and therefore cannot in the long run protect him4 ,that alone which has the power not only to restrain but also to transform the brutal instinct is a conception of the existence of a higher feeling which belongs to the same sphere of life as the instinct itself4 ,to burn the ideal of a great love into the soul of youth in letters of fire--that is to give him a real moral strength4 ,thus there springs up in man the ineradicable1 invincible instinct that an erotic relation can exist only as the expression of a reciprocal all comprehensive love4 ,thus will youth learn to consider the love-marriage as the central life relation1 the center of life1 and he will be inflamed with the desire to develop and to conserve body and soul for the entrance into this most holy thing in nature1 wherein man and woman find their happiness in creating a new race for happiness4 ,thus will young men and women in increasing numbers understand that their own happiness1 as well as that of the coming generation will be the greater the more completely they can give their personality to love4 ,boys and girls1 young men and maidens1 men and women by coeducation1 by joint labor and comradeship will develop in one another that mutual understanding which will remove the enmity between the sexes1 in which modern individualization--and the therewith increasing demands of the personality--has so far found its expression4 ,the usages of individual homes will be differentiated1 instead of as now maintaining the same conventional forms for all families4 ,after some generations so educated1 under the influence of relationships thus arranged1 we shall see marriages such as even now not a few are seen1 in which not observation of a duty but liberty itself is the pledge that assures fidelity4 ,then will love be cherished as the most delicate1 most precious thing in life2 then will egoism and unselfishness attain a perfect harmony1 because the husband and wife find happiness only in assuring the happiness of the other4 ,that is the union which the ,norwegian poet defines when he calls true marriage a yearning quest after each other1 an energetic cultivation1 assertion of the personality1 in order to be able to give one's personality2 an ever increasing intimacy of understanding of each other2 a union which the whole course of life will make more profound4 ,so prepared1 the absolute human ideal will become perhaps a living reality2 not as an isolated man1 not as an isolated woman1 but as a man and a woman who shall give to mankind a new religion--that of happiness4 99 99 99 99 99 ,many indeed still doubt that marriage can become this highest form of existence in life1 in which the surrender of the ego and the self-seeking of the ego reach a perfect harmony4 ,it is asserted that this ideal condition can be attained perhaps by exceptional people1 but never by ordinary people1 and that the morality of the latter can be kept sound only by legal and social restraint4 ,my belief1 however1 is that1 just as the ,children of ,israel followed the pillar of fire1 so ordinary men follow at a distance exceptional men1 and in this way mankind as a whole advances4 ,ordinary men are just now determined upon certain conceptions which at the end of the previous century were not conclusive even for exceptional people4 ,the marriage of reason1 for example1 is already considered ignoble by many4 ,the authority of the parents is very seldom in evidence either to coerce the children into a marriage without love or to restrain them from it4 ,even the superficial erotic emotion of our day is serious in comparison with the shallow and frivolous or vulgar and cruel gallantry of the eighteenth century4 ,in the geological deposits of legislation and still more in those of literature we can study these risings of the levels of the erotic sentiments4 ,so we are thereby convinced that the demands and conflicts of the exceptional men become gradually those of the ordinary men also1 even though the ordinary men are always some generations behind the men who are stirred by new emotions1 new conflicts1 when the many have reached the problems which some decades before occupied only the few4 ,certainly it may1 under present imperfect conditions1 often be a duty not to destroy the outward form of marriage for the sake of the children4 ,but by no means can this duty be preached as universally binding4 ,only the individual himself can in each separate case determine the dissolution best1 both for the children and for the married couple themselves1 of a marriage which has fallen asunder within4 ,when we consider the development in its entirety1 the sooner people cease to sanction the present marriage the more fortunate it will be2 for the sooner will the transformation be forced upon us by which marriage will maintain its permanence only from within4 ,only then will man be wholly able to have the experiences and to find the new1 delicate means by which fidelity can be strengthened and happiness assured4 ,but man will not seek this expedient so long as he can rely upon the power of legal right and social opinion to hold together that which love does not unify4 ,the ever increasing individualization of love indicates that mono-marriage will doubtless remain the form of erotic union between man and woman4 ,but this rule will have1 in the future1 as in the past1 many exceptions1 since the feelings can change4 ,the conflicts which will thus arise will bring suffering as a consequence1 but not the bitterness nor the contention which the property sense in marriage now so often occasions4 ,the deep consciousness that love belongs not to the sphere of duty but only to that of freedom will cause the one who has lost the love of the other to feel the same resignation before the inevitable1 as if he were separated from the other by death4 ,and in cases where the individual is not capable of this resignation1 then the law as well as custom shall make it impossible for the one to hold back the other against his will4 ,each of the twain shall be master of his own person and of his property1 of his work and of his mode of life2 the union shall in each especial case be arranged by the agreement of the individuals1 and the law shall decide only the rights and duties of the husband and wife in regard to the children4 ,when in this way it shall come to pass that neither the husband nor wife shall have in outward sense1 in external things1 anything to gain or to lose by the consummation or dissolution of marriage1 then only the erotic problem appears in all its seriousness4 ,many mistakes1 many caricatures1 many tragic failures will naturally be the result of freedom4 ,great waves have great combers4 ,a new principle cannot be put into effect without bringing with it new mistakes4 ,but we may1 however1 be convinced that the laws of life--to which belongs the law that suffering follows the misuse of freedom--will finally be able to bring everything within its right limits4 ,nothing indeed has occasioned more suffering as an indirect consequence than ,christianity1 and although ,jesus knew that1 yet he did not hesitate to give to mankind this new creative force which destroyed in order to create4 ,but it is above all ,his ideality which ,his present followers lack1 the great ideality which dares to believe in the might of the spirit rather than that of the form4 ,it is1 therefore1 quite natural that these ,christians1 the upholders of society1 oppose the new ideal of morality with vain apprehensions4 ,they believe that a woman whose conscious aim is ,self-assertion in self-surrender will forfeit the immediate1 fresh originality in this surrender4 ,they believe marriage must be destroyed when the support of its development is no longer bond and injunction1 but is its own vital force4 ,they believe morality will lose in the struggle if youth learns to consider the love between man and woman as the central condition of life4 ,these1 and a hundred similar apprehensions have all one and the same source4 ,this source is the ,christian conception of life which has displaced the great1 sound1 strong conviction of antiquity of the holiness of nature4 ,mary was the ,virgin ,mother2 ,jesus1 celibate4 ,paul regarded marriage as the lesser of two evils4 ,thus man first learned to regard the unmarried state as the higher and the married as the lower state4 ,the result of the ,christian conception of life then was that the sex relation was regarded in and for itself as unholy1 human nature in and for itself as base and the earthly demand for happiness as the greatest egotism4 ,therefore the ,christian conception of life is now1 since it has accomplished its great task of culture1 the development of altruism--an obstacle to the unified conception out of which the happiness of mankind will finally develop4 ,no one who thinks or feels deeply dreams that this happiness can be easily achieved4 ,the consistent belief of monism in human nature can only gradually leaven life4 ,and until then suffering will be for the majority the first result of freedom4 ,even for the few1 to whom the relationships have already given happiness1 must this be incomplete in the measure in which they feel sympathy with all the suffering about them4 ,but above all is happiness rare because the genius for happiness is still so rare1 is indeed on the whole the rarest genius4 ,to possess it means to approach life with the humility of a beggar1 but to treat it with the proud generosity of a prince2 to bring to its totality the deep understanding of a great poet and to each of its moments the abandonment and ingenuousness of a child2 it means to be able to enjoy wholly each present1 immediate1 joy and yet to be able to give up the incidental joy for the enduring one4 ,happiness lies so far from man2 but he must begin by daring to will it4 ,it is this courage which ,christianity broke down when it directed the soul from the earth to eternity and gave to renunciation the highest place among ethical values4 ,through the ,revaluation of all ,values1 which is now going on1 happiness will receive this ,place4 ,he who contends for the deepest of all ideas1 ,spinosa's idea1 that ,joy is perfection1 contends with certainty of victory1 however solitary he may stand1 however much of his heart's blood may be shed in the strife4 ,we live still in our inmost soul only by that for which we die4 ,and all for which we have died will live when the time shall come in which all we ourselves have suffered signifies nothing for us1 yet that for which we have suffered signifies everything for others4 ,,the ,,woman ,,of ,,the ,,future ,there are phrases which charm like a song1 and one of these phrases is3 ,the ,woman of the ,future4 ,this sings for me in the verse of a poet and a seer1 whose name now shines with the radiance of the morning star1 although during his lifetime it was sullied with defamation as that of an atheist and destroyer of society--because the luminous path of his thoughts appeared to the prejudices of his contemporaries as a blinding flash of lightning4 ,his poet's vision revealed to him a new time in which women would be 444 frank1 beautiful and kind ,as the free heaven1 which rains fresh light and dew ,on the wide earth ,from custom's evil taint exempt and pure2 ,speaking the wisdom once they could not think1 ,looking emotions once they feared to feel1 ,and changed to all which once they dared not be ,yet being now1 made earth like heaven4 ,this beautiful profile of the woman of the future1 which ,shelley has traced1 floats before me when ,i attempt here to draw her portrait in more precise outlines4 99 99 99 99 99 ,the storm and stress period of woman and the new social and psychological formations thereby entailed must1 indeed1 extend far into the twentieth century4 ,this period of conflict will cease only when woman within and out of marriage shall have received legal equality with man4 ,it will cease when such a transformation of society shall have come to pass that the present rivalry between the sexes shall be ended in a manner advantageous to both and when finally the work of earning a livelihood as well as care of the household shall have received such form that it will weigh less heavily than now upon the woman4 ,toward the end of the twentieth century only could the type of the nineteenth century woman have reached its culmination and a new type of woman begin to appear4 ,my ideal picture of the woman of the future1 and when one paints an ideal one does not need to limit one's imagination1 is that she will be a being of profound contrasts which have attained harmony4 ,she will appear as a great multiplicity and a complete unity2 a rich plenitude and a perfect simplicity2 a thoroughly educated creature of culture and an original spontaneous nature2 a strongly marked human individuality and a complete manifestation of most profound womanliness4 ,this woman will understand the spirit of a scientific work1 of an exact search after truth1 of free1 independent thought1 of artistic creation4 ,she will comprehend the necessity of the laws of nature and of the progress of evolution2 she will possess the feeling of solidarity and regard for the interests of society4 ,because she will know more and think more clearly than the woman of the present1 she will be more just2 because she will be stronger1 she will be better2 because she will be wiser1 she will be also more gentle4 ,she will be able to see things in the ensemble and in their connection with each other2 she will lose thereby certain prejudices which are still called virtues4 ,nevertheless she will remain the one who forms customs4 ,but she will not seek her support in social convention2 she will find it in the laws of her own being4 ,she will have the courage to think her own thoughts and to investigate the new thoughts of her time4 ,she will dare to experience and to acknowledge feelings which she now suppresses or conceals4 ,her full liberty of action and the complete development of her personality will render possible intrepid efforts for life1 an energetic striving after an existence which shall conform to her own ego4 ,and such an existence she will be able also to find with surer instinct than now4 ,she will understand how to work with more intensity1 to rest with more intensity and with more intensity to delight in all immediate1 simple sources of joy than the woman of the present is able to do4 ,thus in the new woman the feeling of life will be enhanced1 her experience will be more profound2 her soul life1 her demands for beauty1 her senses will be more developed and refined4 ,she will be more sensitive1 more delicately vibratory2 she will therefore be able to be more profoundly happy and also to suffer more keenly than the woman of our time4 ,thus the woman of the twentieth century will give new value to the life of society and to art1 to science and to literature4 ,but her greatest cultural significance remains1 however1 by means of the enigmatic1 the instinctive1 the intuitive and the impulsive in her own being to protect mankind from the dangers of excessive culture4 ,in face of knowledge she will maintain the rights of the unknowable2 in face of logic1 feeling2 in face of reality1 possibilities2 and in face of analysis1 intuition4 ,woman will above all further the growth of the soul1 man that of the intelligence2 she will extend the sphere of intuition1 he that of reason2 she will realize tenderness1 he justice2 she will triumph by audacity1 he by courage4 ,the woman of the future will not only have learned much1 she will also have forgotten much--especially the feminine as well as anti-feminine follies of the present time4 ,with her whole being she will desire the happiness of love4 ,she will be chaste1 not because she is cold1 but because she is passionate4 ,she will be reserved1 not because she is bloodless but because she is full blooded4 ,she will be soulful and therefore she will be sensuous2 she will be proud and therefore she will be true4 ,she will demand a great love1 because she herself can give a still greater4 ,the erotic problem1 because of her refined idealism1 will be extremely complicated and often almost insoluble4 ,therefore the happiness which she will give and experience will be richer1 more profound and enduring than anything which up to the present time has been called happiness4 ,many traits which belong to the wife and mother of today will probably be lacking in the woman of the future4 ,she will remain always the beloved1 the sweetheart1 and only so will she become a mother4 ,she will devote her finest and strongest forces to the difficult and beautiful art of being at the same time the beloved and the mother2 her religious cult will be to create the supreme happiness of life4 ,because she will know and value the psychical and physical conditions of health and beauty she will choose the father of her children with clearer vision and deeper feeling of responsibility than at present2 she will bear and rear sound and beautiful beings and she herself will possess greater attraction and longer youth than the woman of the present4 ,she will charm all her life1 because she will always beautify existence4 ,but she will please only because1 at every age1 she will be wholly herself2 and her imperishable youth1 her most perfect beauty1 she will reveal solely to him whom she loves4 ,she will know that the charm of the soul is the most profound2 and out of the plenitude of her being she will create the eternal renewal of this charm1 always unexpected and in infinitely nuanced expressions of her personal grace4 ,by her mere presence she will remove the constraint of form and custom and will create varying expressions1 elevated by her own nobility1 for the family life1 the public life and for society4 ,she will probably speak less than the woman of the present time1 but her silence and her smile will be more eloquent4 ,she will give herself always directly and always with moderation1 different and always constant1 spontaneous and always exquisite4 ,her being will pour forth1 brimming free and fresh1 like the surge of the mountain torrent1 but like this1 dominated by a certain inner rhythm4 ,however far she allows herself to go--in ecstasy of joy1 in passion of tenderness1 in delirium of happiness or in the frenzy of grief--yet she will never lose herself4 ,she will be a multiplicity of women and yet always one1 whether she plays and smiles or suffers and smiles2 whether she beams with health or bleeds with mortal wounds2 whether she be imbued with and radiate repose or nervous intensity1 joy or tears1 sun or night1 coolness or ardor4 ,the woman of the future exists already in man's dreams of women1 and woman fashions herself according to the dreams of man4 ,the modern man's ideal of woman is not the masculine woman1 but the revelation of the eternal feminine developed in all directions4 ,this new type of woman has already gleamed forth here and there1 not only in our time but in centuries passed4 ,in the ,middle ,ages she wrote the letters of ,heloise2 in the ,renaissance1 ,leonardo painted her as ,mona ,lisa2 and in the eighteenth century she held the salon of ,mlle4 ,lespinasse4 ,in our century she wrote the love sonnets of ,elizabeth ,barrett ,browning2 she appeared upon the stage as ,eleonora ,duse--and as in a precious stone her being is crystallized by the poet's words with which ,rahel's personality was epitomized3 calm yet emotionally vivid4,b ,b ,footnote from ,french translation3--,the reference here is to ,rahel de ,varnhagen4 ,the citation is taken from the ,hyperion of ,holderlin1 a ,german poet of whom mention is made apropos of ,nietzsche1 upon whom he had great influence4 ,,the ,,conventional ,,woman ,conventionality is the tacit agreement to set appearance before reality1 form before content1 subordination before principal4 ,its field in certain measure is vogue changing according to the idea of beauty of each new season4 ,in deeper sense1 however1 a part of the sphere of conventionality coincides always with that of law and custom1 and with the conception of the amount of self-control and self-sacrifice which every individual must impose upon himself for the common life with others4 ,the further the evolution of humanity advances1 the fewer are the fields to which the power of society over the thought1 belief1 mode of life and manner of work of the individual is restricted4 ,more and more prevalent becomes the conviction that all those forms of expression of the individual which do not interfere with the rights of others must be free4 ,a great part of the work of culture of each new generation has consisted and still consists in clearing away great masses of conceptions of right dried up into conventionalism1 dead rubbish which prevents the new germs from sprouting4 ,in every period strong voices are heard which desire freedom from the prevailing customs1 and right of choice for the individual conscience and temperament4 ,in this ever-continuous struggle it is important to distinguish what are really still living conceptions of right from factitious conceptions1 which form only a conventional obstacle to a more beautiful freedom1 a deeper truth1 a greater originality1 a richer life content4 ,yet it is not only old conventionalism which needs to be rooted out4 ,in every faction1 in every social circle are soon formed lifeless collections of prejudices1 paltry motives1 dependent customs4 ,it is always the women among whom conventionalism reaches its acme4 ,for conservatism1 that deep significant instinct of woman1 becomes also often a prop of conventionality4 ,women are as yet seldom sufficiently developed personally to distinguish1 in that which they wish to cherish1 the appearance from the reality1 the form from the content2 or if they do distinguish1 they have as yet rarely the courage to choose the content and reality if the majority have declared for form and appearance6 ,in the literature of the last ten years and in part also among women there prevails1 however1 a strong opposition to conventionality4 ,this opposition has been directed especially against the archaic ideal of woman1 according to which renunciation is still considered the highest attribute of woman2 and against the antiquated conception of morality which regarded love without marriage as immoral1 but any marriage1 even without love1 as moral4 ,the women who adopted the new ideal--which a ,norwegian poet strikingly defined as ,self-assertion in self-surrender4 ,affirmation of self in giving of self--encounter now on the part of the modern woman's-rights advocates the same kind of conventional objection as in the fifties and sixties was directed against the then new ideal of the earlier woman movement4 ,the older emancipation movement advanced along the first line in the effort to establish the right of woman as a human being2 that is1 to give to woman the same rights as to man4 ,the present movement purposes to assert the right of woman as an individuality2 the absolute right to believe1 to feel1 to think and to act in her own way1 if it does not interfere with the rights of others4 ,since the first end was a general one1 the movement could in great part be made effective by collective work in attaining that end2 the exposition of the independence of the individuality of woman1 on the contrary1 must be the personal concern of each single individual4 ,this those women do not understand who still are working ever for the first end--the rights of woman as a human being4 ,they do not understand that every woman must receive1 not merely her universal rights1 as a member of the body politic1 but also her entire individual rights as the possessor of a definite personality4 ,the right to establish an ego independent of1 and perhaps entirely at variance with1 theories and ideals is at heart the point of struggle between the one or the other individual woman and the women representatives of the earlier era of the woman question4 ,the discovery that each personality is a new world--which in ,shakespeare found its ,columbus1 a ,columbus after whom new mariners immediately undertook new conquests--this discovery of literature has as yet only partially penetrated the universal consciousness1 as a truth of experience4 ,but the fact that it has made a beginning1 that the conventional1 inflexible conception of the nature of man and of the problems resulting therefrom is giving place to a relative and individual conception--this is above all to be ascribed to the thinkers and poets1 in whom the conventional has its deadliest foe2 the recreative poets whose characteristic is deep appreciation of all primal forces of existence1 of all essential elements of life4 ,for although conventionalism in the form of the echo springs up also around genius1 yet the creative genius itself is always a protest against conventionality in which any selfjustified life or art--conception has perished4 ,the poet who here in the ,north shattered with a blow the archaic conventional ideal of woman who sacrificed herself in all circumstances1 was ,ibsen when he sent ,nora out away from her husband and children in order to fulfill the duties toward herself2 when by means of ,ghosts he etched into the moral consciousness the idea that a woman's fidelity to her own personality is more significant for the welfare of others as well as of herself than her fidelity to conventional conceptions of morality4 ,and ,ibsen has always been the annunciator of the freedom under one's own responsibility which is the key to individualism4 ,long has man listened1 only in part has he understood4 ,and no consciousness is in this respect more hermetically sealed than that of certain woman's rights advocates6 ,that all women should have the same rights as men1 this is all that they mean in their talk about the freeing of the woman's personality4 ,they forget that the right to be what she wishes entails often for the woman1 as for the man1 the obligation to suppress that which she really is by nature and feeling4 ,they forget that the personality has deeper claims than the right to work4 ,they overlook the infinite variety of shades of feeling1 thought and character which caused the demand of solidarity in opinions and actions1 among the women active in the woman question1 to degenerate into suppression of woman's individuality4 ,certainly it is true that united action is still necessary in order that woman may obtain the rights which she still lacks4 ,but all compulsory mobilized action is here more dangerous than elsewhere2 because for the advance of the woman question in the deepest sense it is essential precisely that the different feminine individualities show their useful faculties as freely as possible in the different fields of activity4 ,the conventionality which is a menace in the woman question betrays itself1 not only in exaggerated demands for solidarity1 but also in the mode of treating the objections of the opposition4 ,it reveals itself in the lack of comprehension of the fact that the woman question1 particularly in what concerns the labor field1 now intersects on all sides the path of the social question4 ,it especially evinces itself in the inability to understand how the woman question1 as it advances in its evolution1 becomes more complex1 and how thereby1 ever greater difficulties arise in taking an absolute position in the questions connected with it4 ,it is necessary that woman's opportunities for culture be multiplied4 ,but do all these measures of culture develop also the personality8 ,have we not met the finest1 most original1 most charming natures among unlettered dames of seventy and eighty years1 or among such women as never had a systematic education8 ,it is right that the wages of women should be increased2 but will the labor value of women increase in proportion8 ,can we even desire that the majority of these women bent over their desks shall devote a live interest to their work1 when their sole essential being would first find expression only when bent over a cradle8 ,it is well also for girls of wealth to wish to have a vocation4 ,but is it also good if they1 because they can be satisfied with a smaller wage1 take away the work from poor girls and men1 often more competent1 who have to live entirely by the fruits of their work1 and must therefore demand larger wages8 ,so long as these and many other questions remain unanswered1 there is today quite as much that is conventional in rejoicing unreservedly over the many girls who become students or leave the home1 where they are very much needed1 for outside work1 as there was in our grandmother's time in wishing to limit the province of woman to the kitchen1 the nursery and the drawing room4 ,it is not yet known whether woman1 through the competition for bread1 will develop physiologically and psychologically to greater health and harmony4 ,woman is a new subject for research1 and only centuries of full freedom in choice of labor and in personal development can furnish material for well grounded conclusions4 ,many signs1 however1 point to this3--that an ineffaceable1 deep-rooted psychological difference due to physical peculiarities will always exist between man and woman1 which probably will always keep her by preference active in the sphere of the family1 while he probably will remain active in other spheres of culture4 ,but with a perfect equality with man and a full personal development1 woman can have a significance for culture in its entirety and for the direction of society which we can still scarcely divine4 ,the conventional points of view1 just mentioned in considering the woman question1 retard the development of woman's individuality above all because they overlook the diversity of nature and the complexity of the problem4 ,the conventional conception of self-renunciation as the highest expression of womanhood is still continually the greatest obstacle to the achievement of woman's personality4 ,to be able to perish for a loved being with joy is one of the beautiful inalienable priviliges of woman nature4 ,but by considering this under all circumstances as ideal1 woman has thus retarded not only her own development but also that of man4 ,if we compare marriages of older generations with those of the younger1 the men of the latter show great advance in regard to considerate tenderness and sympathetic understanding toward their wives--wives who have on the other hand a personal life more complete and with other demands than formerly4 ,both have thus gained since women have begun to practice the self-renunciation of self-assertion6 ,because for every self-sacrificing woman nature it is infinitely harder to take her due than to sacrifice it4 99 99 99 99 99 ,conventional womanhood will ever have its strongest support in education4 ,the individuality of a child is seldom repressed in the inconsiderate and brutal manner of former times4 ,but by attrition it is effaced4 ,in the olden times the children enjoyed a certain freedom in the nursery where the expression of life1 manifestation of joy1 pleasure and displeasure1 sympathy and antipathy of the growing personality was not continually moderated4 ,now the children are continually with the parents and these accustom them to a certain exacting restraint4 ,the children wish to be entertained2 they cannot play of their own initiative1 for they lose the desire that originates in the freedom of the creative phantasy4 ,neither children nor parents possess themselves in peace4 ,in the continual association the children are worn out by commands so varied and numerous that obedience cannot be maintained4 ,they do not1 therefore1 learn the discipline necessary for the development of their personality--to subordinate the unessential life expressions to the essential and to dominate even over these last--a culture of the fallow child ground which must begin early in order to become a second nature4 ,and this happens only when the educator knows clearly what he will adhere to as essential in the development of the child1 and when according to that he establishes his commands and prohibitions1 which must be few in number but as immutable as the laws of nature1 and if violated must bring upon the child1 not artificial punishment1 but the inevitable results of the act itself4 ,so can man by fixed practice form the child of nature into a man of culture1 who out of consideration for himself and for others curbs his tendencies which are inimical to society1 without1 however1 suppressing his personality4 ,for outside the field of immutable laws1 children ought not to be constrained or coerced against their nature and their disposition1 against their healthy egoism and against their especial tastes4 ,now many mothers by their own effacement of self develop an unjustified egoism of the child1 but desire in other respects a self-control1 a circumspection1 a moderation and discretion such as a whole life has not ordinarily been able to inculcate in the mother herself4 ,out of this soft clay1 which is material for an individuality1 parents1 servants and teachers mold a society being1 sometimes a social being1 but never a human being4 ,this modeling is called education4 ,and a part of the earliest education must1 as ,i have just shown1 truly consist in that of molding4 ,but after the first years of life the aim of education should be to prevent all molding and on the contrary to assure the freedom or development of the single force which1 considered in the light of the whole1 makes it significant for mankind that new generations succeed those which have disappeared--the force of a new personality4 ,every child is a new world1 a world into which not even the tenderest love can wholly penetrate4 ,however openly the clear eyes meet ours1 however confidingly the soft hand is laid in ours1 this tender being will perhaps one day deplore the suffering of his childhood1 because we treated him according to the assumption that children are replicas1 not originals2 not new1 wonderful personalities4 ,it is true the child in certain measure is a repetition of the child nature of all times1 but at the same time1 and this in a far higher degree1 an absolutely new synthesis of soul qualities1 with new possibilities for sorrow and joy1 strength and weakness4 ,this new being will1 upon his own responsibility1 at his own risk1 live this terrifyingly earnest life4 ,what creative force1 new inceptions1 he will be able to bring to it2 what elasticity he will possess under the blows of destiny1 what power to give and to receive happiness--all depends1 outside of nature itself1 in essential degree upon the educator's method of treating this individual child nature4 ,goethe long ago lamented that education aspired to make ,philistines out of personalities4 ,and this is now much worse since education has become pedagogical1 without at the same time becoming psychological4 ,only he who treats the feelings1 will and rights of a child with quite the same consideration as those of a grown person1 and who never allows the personality of a child to feel other limitations than those of nature itself1 or the consideration1 based upon good grounds1 for the child's own welfare or that of others--only he possesses the first requisite principle of real education4 ,education must assuredly be a liberating of the personality from the domination of its own passions4 ,but it must never strive to exterminate passion itself1 which is the innermost power of the personality and which cannot exist without the coexisting danger of a corresponding fault4 ,to subdue the possible fault in each spiritual inclination by eliciting through love the corresponding good in the same inclination--this alone is individual education4 ,it is an extremely slow education1 in which immediate interference signifies little1 the spiritual atmosphere of the home1 its mode of life and its ideals signify on the contrary almost everything4 ,the educator must above all understand how to wait3 to reckon all effects in the light of the future1 not of the present4 ,the educator believes often that he spares the child future suffering when he opposes his onesidedness1 as it is called4 ,he does not reflect that in the effort to force the child in a direction contrary to that in which his personality evinces itself1 he merely succeeds in diminishing his nature2 yes1 often merely in retaining the weakness in the quality1 not the corresponding strength6 ,but ordinarily it is indeed no such principle1 but only the old thoughtlessly maintained ideal of self-renunciation which is decisive4 ,we repress the child's joy of discovery and check the spirit of enterprise2 wound his extremely sensitive sense of beauty2 exercise force over his most personal possessions1 his tokens of tenderness2 combat his aversions and quench his enthusiasm4 ,amid such attacks upon their individual being1 their feelings and their inclinations most children1 but especially girls1 grow up4 ,it is therefore not surprising that when grown they seldom look back upon their childhood as a happy time4 ,an intense feeling of life1 a sense of plenitude1 entirety1 of the complete development of the powers of the potentialities--this constitutes happiness4 ,children have more possibilities of happiness than adults1 for they can experience this feeling of joy of life more undividedly and immediately4 ,they should utilize these possibilities of happiness while the parents have partial power over their life4 ,soon enough must they on their own initiative attempt1 accomplish1 bleed2 and herein no one of all the influences of education has even approximately the significance of this3 that the individual be not overtrained1 that he have still strength enough to live4 ,that means3 to suffer his own sorrow1 to enjoy his own happiness1 to perform his own work1 to think his own thoughts1 to be able to devote himself absolutely and entirely--the sole condition of being able to work1 to love and to die4 ,it is a deep psychological truth that the kingdom of heaven belongs to the children4 ,for no one attains the highest that life offers in any other way than by simplicity1 unworldliness and the power of devoting his whole being without reserve to his object4 ,this is the strength of the child nature4 ,if a mother by education has preserved this holy strength and developed it to a conscious power1 then she has given to mankind not only a new being but a new personality4 ,but the education in the family1 just as in the school1 is tending in the opposite direction4 ,the destruction of the personality is therefore the great evil of the time4 99 99 99 99 99 ,yet man is fortunately a vigorous organism4 ,and those1 whose personality has been bowed or repressed by education1 could raise themselves again and create freedom for their development if they were aware of the value of this freedom4 ,few beings and so likewise few women can be exceptional4 ,but if only a few are destined for a great personality1 yet nevertheless most can1 in spite of the errors of education1 develop a certain degree of personality1 if they are deeply1 earnestly concerned in it4 ,for everything is interrelated4 ,no one lives unpunished by a second hand4 ,we cannot advance intellectually by borrowing1 without becoming also morally less scrupulous4 ,we are today unjust to a book1 a picture1 a drama1 because we pronounce judgment upon it according to the words of others1 or because we do not dare to show the pleasure it gives us1 in case the critic has not granted us permission to be pleased1 or because we feign indignation we do not feel1 but which others require of us in the name of taste or morality4 ,tomorrow1 in the same way1 we shall be unjust or dishonest to man1 or to our own feeling--an injustice or a dishonesty which can have influence over the destiny of a whole life4 ,the sum of spiritual riches1 of spiritual utilities1 is thereby diminished if we do not cede to the whole what is most essentially ours4 ,that which is really our own may be great or small1 rich or insignificant--if we ourselves have felt or thought it1 it is more significant to others than that which we merely repeat1 even if our authority be the highest4 ,and in those cases where we must rely upon authorities1 we still can put a certain personality into our choice and honesty in acknowledging our indebtedness1 by confessing that we have borrowed our judgment we can put honesty and originality into this dependence4 ,it is possible for no one to acquire more than a limited amount of the results of culture1 to form an entirely original judgment oftener than in a few isolated cases4 ,but each one can learn to understand that it is a mark of culture not to pronounce judgment upon questions with which he is not conversant4 ,good taste prescribes that just as one refuses to wear false jewels if one possesses no real ones1 so one should refrain from pronouncing judgment upon persons or questions upon which one has not formed an opinion through one's own impressions4 ,when this honesty begins to be considered a mark of spiritual refinement1 then will the culture of woman have made quite as great advance as when she learned to read4 ,for next to the power to form decisions for one's self stands in culture value the ability to understand what opinions one does not possess and the courage to recognize one's delicacy4 ,courage and truth--that is what women lack above all4 ,and these are the qualities which they must cultivate if the feminine personality is to grow4 ,this does not result because women devote themselves to study1 be it ever so thorough1 or to social tasks1 be they ever so responsible4 ,both further the development of woman's personality in the measure only in which her own investigations1 her own choice1 make her means of culture and her work an organic part of herself4 ,to develop woman's personality from within--that is the great woman question4 ,to free woman from conventionality--that is the great aim of the emancipation of woman4 ,such a conception of the woman question is for me the ideal conception of this present great movement4 ,and ideality does not mean to adopt as the conception of life that which the majority considers ideal4 ,ideality means to live for the ideal1 which has inflamed our consciousness and not to violate this consciousness by adapting it to such ideals as we feel with our whole soul are lower4 ,if it is true that the lack of genius is the lack of courage1 so then is it still more true in regard to the lack of personality4 ,here lies one of the reasons why individuality is less often found among women than among men4 ,a man is more fully inflamed with his idea1 the object of his work2 he is more intense in that which he knows and which he wills4 ,he becomes thus often--just as the child--more onesided1 almost always more egoistic1 but much more absolute than a woman in like position4 ,she is rarely1 except in love1 wholly penetrated by that which occupies her4 ,it is then easier for her to be considerate1 to look about continuously upon all sides4 ,she is more mobile1 more quickly sensitive1 more manysided and more supple than man1 and therein lies her strength4 ,but just as that of man1 it is bought at the price of corresponding weakness4 ,for equipoise is still so difficult in human nature that a good quality is often not the product of a multiplication1 but is the remainder after a subtraction4 ,the man becomes thus especially creative through his greater courage to dare1 his more intense power to will2 the woman becomes the often anxious conservator4 ,she cherishes with fidelity1 not only the customs and memories of the home1 but also society's traditional sentiments and conceptions of right4 ,but this very conspicuous conservatism of the woman is exactly that which has obstructed the development of exceptional femininity4 ,the personal independence of man is hampered because he must work ordinarily in close association with others2 whereby he is bound by party discipline and party spirit1 by considerations for preferment or other interests4 ,the personality of woman on the other hand is more fettered by conventional conceptions of morality and a conventional ideal of woman4 ,she will not distinguish the self-sacrifice which is of value from that which from all points of view is valueless4 ,she does not rely upon her own instinct for right if this instinct deviates only a hair's breadth from the generally accepted idea4 ,she pardons the one who sins against established conceptions of right1 provided only he recognizes their validity2 but she condemns the one who has acted contrary to this conception in sincere conviction1 because his idea of right differs from that of the majority6 ,she confounds in her judgment temperament and opinions1 doctrine and life--a confusion which is the origin of all spiritual tyranny1 of all social intolerance4 ,especially does this obtain in questions which concern the relation of the sexes4 ,every one who expresses an opinion at variance with the conventional ideal of morality has then incurred intrusive conclusions and blasting defamation of his private life4 ,on the part of women then--if it is a question concerning a woman--it must all the more be accepted that it requires not only a glowing red belief but also a snow-white conscience to dare defy society in its most sensitive prejudices4 ,conventionality of the woman attains its culminating point in the thoughtless and conscienceless repetition of others' words by which most women lower their spiritual level1 distort1 disfigure their character and eventually stultify their personality4 ,a woman who makes any pretensions to fineness1 evinces this among other things1 by avoiding all borrowed or sham luxury4 ,she scorns spurious effects1 tinsel1 and disdains therefore in her dress and her home all artificial ornamentation4 ,but this same woman utters boldly counterfeited opinions and spurious judgments as her own4 ,even if she possesses it she dare not express a fresh1 original opinion1 a warm direct feeling4 ,and her forgeries are then transmitted by other plagarists from circle to circle4 ,thus ,public ,opinion is formed upon the most delicate life problems1 the most serious life work4 ,thus the most noble actions become dubious and the vilest calumnies positive authentic truths4 ,thus the air becomes congested with the grains of sand1 under which a man's works of honor are buried4 ,but a work or a renown which has been interred can be exhumed4 ,it is the blind re-echoers of others' words1 themselves1 who must at length disappear forever4