,,the ,,development ,,of ,armor-piercing ,shells 7,with ,suggestions for their ,improvement7 ,by ,,carlos ,,de ,,zafra1 ,m4,e4 ,faculty ,lecturer1 ,new ,york ,university #aiae ,historical ,the manufacture of projectiles to meet the requirements of the modern science of warfare has been brought to its present high stage of development through a long series of experiments based1 at first1 more upon theory than perhaps any other branch of engineering4 ,in the days of wooden vessels very little thought was given to the actual physical properties of the then cast iron spherical mass4 ,the gun was the agent upon which depended the ability of the projectile to penetrate4 ,the projectile1 being confronted by so slight a resisting material as wood1 was distorted or physically affected to practically no degree by the resisting medium4 ,when fighting yard-arm to yard-arm the power of the gun was sufficient to fully penetrate the enemy1 while at long ranges considerable damage would be executed without in the least impairing1 by the shock of impact 7which was inconsiderable as compared with modern conditions7 the physical condition of the shot4 ,in the days of the all-wood vessel the guns were of the smooth-bore class divided into various types with nomenclature according to the size or weight of the shot1 very much as they are today1 i4e41 #c-pounder1 #f-pounder1 #d-;inch1 #aj-;inch1 etc4 ,a general review of the gradual development of projectiles will be found beneficial and helpful to a more complete understanding of the complexities involved in overcoming the present day difficulties4 ,in the smooth-bore gun spherical shot was used4 ,this was by no means a tight fitting device4 ,upon firing the gun considerable powder pressure was lost through the rapid escape of the gases past the shot between it and the bore of the gun4 ,this would most naturally be expected since at best the surface of contact between the shot and the bore would be only a circular line quickly eliminated or worn away through friction under the high temperature of the burning gases behind the shot4 ,the most obvious way to eliminate that wearing away of the bearing surface was to increase it1 in doing which the escape of gas past the projectile would be greatly checked1 and the gas pressure behind the projectile increased 7exerting1 thereby1 a greater propelling force7 and imparting to the projectile greater velocity1 increased momentum1 and consequent increased penetration4 ,but an increase in the bearing surface of the shot necessitated an alteration in its shape introducing difficulties affecting the accuracy of its passage through the air4 ,it was not an appreciation of any ineffectiveness in the early shot that first brought about a realization of the importance of obtaining the highest possible results from the material at hand1 for no difficulty was experienced in penetrating the early wooden barriers4 ,but with the introduction of rail-road and boiler iron and anchor chains along the sides of the vessels of war as a protection it was demonstrated that the old round shot previously most effective at the same range was now of little consequence4 ,armored vessels1 though crude as was their armor1 could with impunity run up along side a wooden enemy and demand immediate surrender with immediate destruction as the penalty for non-compliance4 ,it is only necessary to refer to the ,naval ,history of the ,civil ,war of the ,united ,states for the most convincing proof that this was so4 ,thus began one of the greatest industrial wars of the ,world--the ,battle of ,guns and ,armor1 which has been constantly waged through years of international peace and prosperity1 and is destined to continue indefinitely or until the ,utopian days of ,universal ,disarmament and everlasting peace arrive4 ,early ,developments ,with the change from the spherical to the longitudinal projectile1 difficulties in securing accuracy of flight arose not previously existing4 ,it was found that the elongated projectile would tumble or revolve about its transverse axis during its flight1 also wobble or describe a cork screw or spiral trajectory--capital defects requiring immediate attention4 ,the principle of the gyroscope to the effect that a body would maintain any desired position while revolving at a high rate about the proper axis was known and it was found desirable to adopt this principle in some practical manner to the development and improvement of the projectile4 ,it was believed that were it possible to give a high rotative speed to the projectile about its major axis the desired object of keeping that axis co-incident with the vertical plane of the trajectory would be accomplished4 ,among the first steps towards the development of the modern rifled artillery and elongated projectile we find certain improvements to have originated in the small arms pieces4 ,in his ,report on the ,art of ,war in ,europe in #ahed1 #ahee1 and #ahef ,colonel ,r4 ,delafield1 ,u4,s4,a41 gives the first reference of immediate importance to the subject in question4 ,the small arms bullet was of lead which readily adapted itself to such configuration as was desired4 ,great contrariety of opinion existed as to the best form of ball and principle1 even1 by which it was caused to partake of the rifle twist of the gun barrel4 ,the following are some of the first forms and methods adopted and are worthy of consideration3 ,illustration3 ,fig4 #a ,among the ,french and some others the tige principle was employed4 ,it consisted in forcing the base of the ball open so as to fit the bore and rifle grooves by driving it on a projecting spike in the bottom of the gun attached to the breech1 and rising through the charge of powder1 as in ,fig4 #a4 ,for this purpose a countersunk rammer head to fit over the head of the ball had to be used4 ,illustration3 ,fig4 #b ,fig4 #c ,fig4 #d ,fig4 #e ,fig4 #f ,fig4 #g ,in the ,english ,enfield rifle a form of ball was used consisting of a hollow cup or cone in the bored-out base of the ball 7,figs4 #b and #c7 the action of the powder driving this cup into the ball causing it to expand and take the rifling4 ,iron cups were used in the ,crimea but because of occasionally cutting off and leaving in the bore a ring of lead were discarded for solid wood or papier mache cups 7,fig4 #d74 ,figs4 #e and #f show forms of hollow base balls used by the ,french and ,russians1 in which the direct action of the powder on the base caused the sought for expansion into the rifling4 ,the ,russians at ,sebastopol employed also a fourth principle consisting of two short projections or lugs on the cylindrical part of the solid ball to engage in two grooves cut in the bore of the gun4 ,its proportions are illustrated by ,fig4 #g4 ,illustration3 ,fig4 #h ,fig4 #i ,fig4 #aj ,fig4 #aa ,fig4 #ab ,fig4 #ac ,the modifications of the preceding forms1 shown in ,figs4 #h and #i were used in the ,crimea by the ,sardinian army which also used a smoothbore musket with solid ball as per ,fig4 #aj4 ,the ,french army ,zouaves used a solid cylindro-conical grooved ball1 as in ,fig4 #aa1 in a tige rifle4 ,the #ahef ,austrian rifle used a solid cylindro-conical ball1 with two deep grooves cut in the cylindrical part such that the parts between the grooves are forced together and outwards1 or upset by the explosion of the powder1 to fill the bore and the rifle grooves1 as in ,fig4 #ab4 ,fig4 #ac illustrates the same principle as used by the ,saxon army4 ,illustration3 ,fig4 #ad ,fig4 #ae ,fig4 #af ,fig4 #ag ,fig4 #ah ,other forms used at the time by the various ,powers are illustrated in ,figs4 #ad1 #ae1 #af1 #ag1 and #ah4 ,but it was an open question as to which was the best form1 no ,power being fully satisfied4 ,it may be noted here that as the breech-loading rifle had not up to this time been sufficiently perfected1 all the above bullets were for muzzle loading rifles4 ,breech-loading arms had been known for over two centuries but were as yet unreliable1 clumsy1 and generally imperfect4 ,illustration3 ,fig4 #ai4 ,the ,lancaster ,gun4 ,the early methods adopted in the construction of cannon to impart to the projectile the desired rotary motion are as interesting as the early methods adopted in the construction of the projectile4 ,heavy rifled artillery was introduced in #ahef against ,cronstadt4 ,the ,english artillery at ,sebastopol used the ,lancaster ,gun1 illustrated in ,fig4 #ai4 ,the form of the bore section of this gun was that of an ellipse of #h and #h-e_/h diameters1 the bore being generated by the section of such an elipse making a revolution of about one-quarter turn in the length of the bore1 the center of the section always co-incident with the longitudinal axis of the gun1 forming thereby a continuous elliptical cylinder1 the greater axis at the muzzle lying in the vertical plane and gradually becoming horizontal at the breech section1 or in other words1 the whole length and section of the bore was a rifle twist of one quarter of a turn in its length4 ,the projectile was a wrought iron shell of the form and size indicated in ,fig4 #bj1 as ascertained by measurement of one found in the trenches at ,sebastopol4 ,illustration3 ,fig4 #bj ,the use of these guns in the siege was by no means satisfactory1 giving neither precision of fire nor extraordinary range1 while the gun more often failed by bursting than other types4 ,the principle1 however1 met with favor and was studied and improved upon4 ,another method of applying the rifle principle to heavy guns consisted in casting a segment of a sphere 7nearly7 on the side of the cylinder part of the shot with corresponding grooves in the bore of the gun1 making about one turn in twenty feet4 ,it is somewhat like the principle of the solid musket ball1 ,fig4 #g with a difference in the shape of the projections1 as shown in the annexed ,fig4 #ba1 giving the form and size 7nearly7 of the shot4 ,guns of this pattern were adopted for many of the gunboats fitted out by ,france for operations in the ,baltic in #ahef1 some with four and others with two guns each4 ,illustration3 ,fig4 #ba ,illustration3 ,fig4 #bb ,the bore of the gun had a circular section of #f-a_/b diameter with two grooves cut in it1 as shown in ,fig4 #bb1 which in the length of the bore had a twist equal to one turn in six meters4 ,figures #bc and #bd represent cast iron shot of very peculiar shape1 intended apparently1 as a substitute for the rifle groove4 ,they were cylinders of about four inches diameter1 with a flattened spherical head from which three spiral openings communicate with the open interior of the cylinder4 ,the cylindrical part was formed with grooves4444 ,illustration3 ,fig4 #bc ,illustration3 ,fig4 #bd ,the ,modern ,type of ,gun ,from these earliest examples the development of artillery has been gradual until the present day of the built-up gun with an energy and range undreamed of in the earlier days4 ,the built-up gun of today has attained to a calibre of #af inches1 a length of nearly #ej feet1 a weight of #abd tons1 and an extreme range at #db deg4 elevation of #bj4i miles with a maximum height of trajectory of over #e-c_/d miles4 ,the projectile1 too1 has increased in size from a few pounds to the one ton or #b1bdj-pound mass used in the above gun4 ,the energy imparted to it at the muzzle amounts to #f1djh-;foot tons assuring a penetration at the muzzle of #cc4h inches of steel1 or at #c1ejj yards of #bg4e inches1 the muzzle velocity being #a1ige-;foot-seconds and powder charge #fdj pounds of smokeless4 ,the maximum pressure in the powder chamber allowed is #cg1jjj pounds per square inch4 ,briefly the modern gun is a built-up piece1 constructed by fitting or shrinking super-imposed hoops or cylinders one over the other in size and number as diagramatically explained in ,fig4 #be1 sufficient to re-inforce the bore to withstand the varied pressures4 ,illustration3 ,fig4 #be4 #ac-;inch ,b4,l4,r4 7,total ,length1 #dj feet47 ,illustration3 ,fig4 #bf ,the twist or rotary motion is imparted to the projectile by means of the rifling in the bore4 ,fig4 #bf shows the cross-section of an #h-;inch gun with the dimensions of the rifling1 which is composed of two elements1 the groove or spiral cut made in the bore and the land or space between two adjacent grooves4 ,to take these grooves rotating bands of soft metal1 generally copper1 are fitted to the projectile as will be explained under ,manufacture of ,projectiles4 ,classification of ,projectiles ,projectiles are classified according to their calibre1 type of gun for which they are intended1 material of which they are made1 etc41 as per the following scheme used in the ,u4,s4 ,army for marking cases of projectiles3 ,cast steel ,inch ,rifle ,cast iron ,mortar ,common steel ,shot ,armor piercing ,shell ,rendable ,a4,p4 ,weight empty--,lbs4 ,capped or uncapped or ,capped and grooved for base cover or ,uncapped and grooved for base cover ,base ,fuze ,point ,manufacture of ,projectiles ,while a high state of development has been attained in the manufacture of armor-piercing shells attention will be confined to their manufacture in so much as the methods for improvement hereinafter suggested are intended to affect the physical and not the chemical properties of the material1 and are1 therefore1 applicable to all projectiles in which the stresses to be resisted exceed the resisting powers of the projectiles as at present manufactured4 ,the function to be performed by an armor-piercing shell is that of fully penetrating1 without disruption to itself1 an armor plate in thickness equal to1 at least1 the calibre of the shell in question1 and then be in condition for effective bursting4 ,the following extracts from the ,army and ,navy specifications pertain to3 ,,material ,,and ,,workmanship 7,art #bj1 ,o4 ,d41 ,u4,s4,a47 ,the projectiles must be of forged steel1 sound1 and free from cracks1 seams1 and other defects#a4 #a ,italics are those of the author and refer to defects which it is the object of his design and method of manufacture to remedy4 ,the base plugs must be of forged steel1 annealed after forging or tempering1 free from seams1 cracks1 and other defects1 and have the following physical properties3 ,elastic limit #ej1jjj to #fj1jjj pounds ,tensile strength #ij1jjj to #ajj1jjj ,elongation #ah per cent4 ,contraction #be ,the projectiles shall be machine-finished1 before treatment1 as close to the prescribed dimensions as may be consistent with that operation1 and must1 if necessary1 be finally finished to the prescribed dimensions within the allowed variations4 ,cylindrical tensile-test specimens with diameter of stem of #j4eje inch will be used in all cases when the piece is sufficiently thick to finish the stem to that dimension2 when not1 the inspectors will determine the exact form or diameter of the specimens to be used1 the largest practicable being used1 considering the piece under test4 ,a length of stem between gauge marks of #b inches will be used in all cases where the elongation is to be taken4 ,,capping 7,art4 #ba1 ,o4 ,d41 ,u4,s4,a47 ,all steel projectiles shall be fitted1 when required1 with a cap of soft steel placed upon the point1#b the caps to be of the dimensions shown on the approved drawings and secured in a manner satisfactory to the ,chief of ,ordnance by means of a groove1 to be turned on the head of the projectile prior to tempering4 #b ,see ,frontispiece4 ,the steel for the cap must show a tensile strength not to exceed #fj1jjj pounds per square inch1 an elongation after rupture of not less than #cj per cent1 and a reduction in area of not less than #de per cent on standard specimens1 #b inches long between measuring points and #j4eje inch in diameter4 ,these caps will be thoroughly annealed before being placed upon the projectiles and will be free from cracks and all other defects4 ,,test ,,for ,,detection ,,of ,,holes1 ,,cracks1 ,,etc4 7,art4 #bg1 ,o4 ,d41 ,u4,s4,a47 ,after the submission of a lot to the inspector for selection of samples for ballistic test1 and before final delivery1 the projectiles must be subjected to an interior hydraulic pressure of #ejj pounds per square inch for one minute4 ,all projectiles in which holes1 cracks1 or any unsoundness are developed by this test will be rejected4 ,,tensile ,,test 7,art4 #bh1 ,o4 ,d41 ,u4,s4,a47 ,after forging1 the projectiles shall be annealed at a temperature of at least #a1bjj deg4 ,f42 and after being annealed1 tangential test specimens shall be taken from the base or base prolonged of #b per cent of the projectiles from each lot selected at random by the inspector4 ,the tensile strength of the projectiles in a lot shall not vary more than #bj1jjj pounds from the highest to the lowest4 ,,chemical ,,test 7,art4 #cj1 ,o4 ,d41 ,u4,s4,a47 ,a careful and complete chemical analysis shall be made of the metal of each heat from which the projectiles are manufactured under these specifications4 ,,tests ,,for ,,the ,,detection ,,of ,,initial ,,strains ,,bordering ,,on ,,rupture 7,art4 #ca1 ,o4 ,d41 ,u4,s4,a47 ,after final treatment and before acceptance for the ballistic test1 all ,a4,p4 shot must be cooled to a temperature of about #dj deg4 ,f41 and then suddenly heated by being plunged into a bath of water at a temperature of from #ahj deg4 ,f4 to #bab deg4 ,f41 as the ,chief of ,ordnance may direct4 ,when thoroughly heated to this temperature each projectile must be plunged1 with its axis horizontal1 halfway into a bath of water at a temperature not greater than #dj deg4 ,f41 and after a brief period shall be turned #ahj deg4 for a like immersion of the opposite side1 after which the projectile shall be removed from the bath4 ,this test shall be made in the presence of the inspector1 and an interval of at least three days must elapse between the final treatment and the submission of the projectiles to this test4 ,this test is not required for shell4 ,,ballistic ,,test 7,art4 #cb1 ,o4 ,d41 ,u4,s4,a47 ,each lot of projectiles shall be subjected to the following ballistic test3 ,after a final treatment and on presentation of the entire lot for the ballistic test1 the inspector shall select three projectiles to represent the lot1 which shall be finished1 inspected and delivered in the same manner as required for the rest of the lot4 7a7 ,armor-piercing shot4 ,two capped shot1 sandloaded to standard weight1 shall be fired against a hard-faced ,krupp armor plate from #a to #a-a_/b calibres thick1 secured to a timber backing in a manner satisfactory to the ,chief of ,ordnance1 with about the corresponding velocity given by the following table1 with the requirement that the shot shall perforate the plate unbroken and then be in condition for effective bursting4 ,if both projectiles fulfill the above test1 the lot will be accepted4 ,if1 one of the shots fails to pass the test here prescribed1 a supplementary test shall be made by firing the third shot under the same conditions as the first two shot2 if this passes the test as prescribed above1 the lot shall be accepted2 if it fails to do this1 the lot shall not be accepted4 ---------------------------------------- ---------------- ,calibre of ,weight of ,thickness of ,velocity for shot shot plate penetration ---------------------------------------- ---------------- #d-;inch #ccc #d-;inch #a1icj #e-;inch #b1bie #d4g-;inch #dec #e-;inch #b1bbj #e-;inch #eh #e-;inch #b1jje #f-;inch #b1cbj #f-;inch #ajf #f-;inch #a1iej #h-;inch #b1dej #h-;inch #caf #h-;inch #a1gfj #aj-;inch #b1ajj #aj-;inch #fjd #aj-;inch #a1gde #ab-;inch #b1jbj #ab-;inch #a1jdf #ab-;inch #a1gcj ---------------------------------------- ---------------- #c ,weight uncapped4 ,for intermediate thickness the velocity shall be determined by interpolation4 7b7 ,armor-piercing shell4 ,two capped shell1 sandloaded to standard weight1 shall be fired against a hard-faced ,harveyized armor plate secure to a timber backing in a manner satisfactory to the ,chief of ,ordnance1 of #c-;inches thickness for #e-;inch and #f-;inch shell1 #d-;inches for #h-;inch shell1 #e-;inches for #aj-;inch shell1 and #f-;inches for #ab-;inch shell1 with a velocity#d of about #a1dbj f4s4 for the #e-;inch shell1 #a1bbj f4s4 for the #f-;inch shell and #ibj f4s4 for the #h-;inch1 #aj-;inch and #ab-;inch shell at impact1 with the requirement that the shell shall go through the plate unbroken1 and then be in a condition for effective bursting4 #d ,the weight of powder charge to give the prescribed velocity will be determined shortly before the test1 cast iron projectiles of proper weight being fired for the purpose2 this weight of charge will be taken as giving the prescribed velocity to the projectiles undergoing test4 99 99 99 99 99 7c7 #ab-;inch deck piercing shell4 ,two shell1 sandfilled to standard weight1 will be fired with a striking velocity sufficient to pass completely through a #d-a_/b-;inch nickel-steel protective-deck plate inclined so as to give an angle of impact of #fj degrees1 and to be supported by a suitable backing of wood2 or both shell shall be subjected to such alternate ballistic test as the ,department may judge to be an equivalent to the above in its effect upon the projectile4 99 99 99 99 99 ,the nickel-steel protective-deck plate shall be manufactured by the open-hearth process and shall contain about #c-a_/d per cent of nickel1 not more than six one-hundredths of one per cent of phosphorous2 not more than four one-hundredths of one per cent of sulphur1 shall be the best composition in all respects4 ,it shall be oil or water tempered and annealed1 and the whole plate shall be subjected to the same treatment at the same time4 ,tensile test will be made after final treatment4 ,one longitudinal specimen for tensile test will be taken from each plate4 ,each shall show a tensile strength of at least #hj1jjj pounds per square inch and an elongation in #b inches of at least #bg per cent4 ,bending tests will be made as follows3 ,a piece cut from the plate shall be doubled cold around a curve of which the diameter is not more than the thickness of the piece tested without showing any cracks4 ,the ends of the piece are to be parallel after bending4 ,these specimens shall be #ab inches long1 #a-a_/b inches wide1 and #a inch thick4 ,at the discretion of the inspector1 bending specimens #a_/b inch square taken with a hollow drill1 may be substituted4 ,such specimens must bend cold to #ahj degrees flat1 without sign of fracture on outer surface4 7d7 #ab-;inch ,torpedo ,shell4 ,two shell1 sandloaded to standard weight1 will be fired from a gun or mortar into a sand butt with a pressure in the powder chamber of about #cg1jjj pounds per square inch to test structural ability4 ,if the shell are found not seriously deformed by discharge from the piece and in a condition for effective bursting1 the lot will be accepted4 ,if any of the shell fail to pass this test1 the lot will be rejected4 ,the following extract from the ,circulars and ,specifications of the ,navy ,department concerning ,armor ,plate and ,appurtenances for ,vessels of the ,u4,s4 ,navy1 7,april #bb1 #aijg7 while pertaining to another subject1 will be pardoned if introduced here for the purpose of demonstrating the seemingly paradoxical requirements a manufacturer is called upon to meet3 7,par4 #fj47 ,the ballistic test for acceptance of armor shall be made as strictly as practicable in accordance with the following tables1 the ,department reserving the right to use guns of other calibres than designated for any plate if it is deemed advisable4 ,in the test of armor of ,class ,a there shall be three impacts with striking velocities as given in the following table1 capped armor-piercing projectiles being used3 ---------------------------------------- -------- ,wt4 of shell ,calibre of ,thickness of ,striking capped gun plates velocity ,pounds ,inches ,inches ,ft4-seconds ---------------------------------------- -------- #aje #f #e #a1dea #aje #f #f #a1fdh #aje #f #g #a1hcf #afe #g #f #a1dfd #afe #g #g #a1fca #afe #g #h #a1gia #bfj #h #g #a1dei #bfj #h #h #a1fjc #bfj #h #i #a1gda #eaj #aj #i #a1deh #eaj #aj #aj #a1efh #eaj #aj #aa #a1fgf #hgj #ab #aa #a1dbd #hgj #ab #ab #a1ead ---------------------------------------- -------- ,the first impact shall be located near the central portion of the plate1 and the other two impacts shall be located as directed by the ,bureau2 no impact1 however1 to be nearer another impact or an edge of the plate than #c-a_/b calibres of the projectile used4 ,on these three impacts no projectile or fragment thereof shall get entirely through the plate and backing1 nor shall any through crack develop to an edge of the plate or to another impact4 99 99 99 99 99 ,from the above it is seen that a manufacturer supplying both armor-plate and shell to the ,government is called upon to produce a shell with sufficient integrity to completely penetrate1 and without breaking up1 his armor-plate of sufficient thickness to resist that shell4 ,the capping of projectiles consists in placing over the point a cone or mass of metal of comparative softness4 ,in the ,united ,states services soft steel is used for the purpose4 ,authorities disagree as to the exact function which the cap plays1 some claiming it to act as a lubricating metal facilitating the passage of the projectile1 others claim that it gives an initial shock to the armor-plate before the shell proper has struck it1 which latter then strikes the plate in a state of molecular unrest1 and1 therefore1 of impaired resisting power4 ,firing tests of shell at armor-plate at oblique angles have proven the capped shell superior1 which would indicate that the cap in this instance at any rate is capable of securing a hold on the plate which the bare point of the shell cannot1 in so much as uncapped shells glance off4 ,at any rate capped projectiles are1 on the whole1 superior to the uncapped and the practice of capping is recommended as an additional advantage when used in conjunction with the improvements here-in-after described4 ,at a specified distance from the base of the shell a groove or band-score is turned for the rotation band4 ,for projectiles under #g-;inches calibre1 pure copper is usually employed1 but for larger calibre an alloy of #ig-a_/b per cent of pure copper and #b-a_/b per cent of nickel is used and is annealed before banding4 ,the rough bands are in a form of solid rings cut from drawn tubes or cylindrical castings1 and must be carefully hammered into the score or preferably pressed in by hydraulic pressure and finally turned to proper size1 shape1 and finish4 ,their use has been previously described and the improvements in armor-piercing shells hereinafter described are based upon a study of the stresses sustained by a projectile upon impact while rotating about its major axis at the high rotative velocity which the engaging of these bands with the rifling of the gun has imparted to the shell4 ,the following table compiled by the author gives the rotative velocities of various projectiles3 ---------------------------------------- ------------------- ,muz4 ,engy4 ,calibre,wt41 lbs4 ,muz4 ,vel4 ,ft4 ,type of ,inches ,projectile ,ft4 ,secs4 ,r4,p4,s4 ,r4,p4,m4 ,tons ,gun ---------------------------------------- ------------------- #c #ab #hgj #aci #h1cdj #fc ,hotchkiss #c4b #ac4e #a1fhe #bec #ae1ahj #bff ,field '#ij #c4f #bj #a1eej #bjf #ab1cfj #ccc #ahia #c4f #bj #fej #hf #e1afj #ei ,mortar #ahij #e #de #a1hcj #agf #i1efja1jde ,siege #ahij #g #aje #a1jhe #gf #d1efj #hec ,howitzer '#ij #g #abe #fij #di #b1idj #dab ,mortar '#ib ---------------------------------------- ------------------- ,u4,s4 ,,sea-,,coast ,,land ,,service ,,guns ---------------------------------------- ------------------- ,muz4 ,engy4 ,calibre,wt41 lbs4 ,muz4 ,vel4 ,ft4 ,type of ,inches ,projectile ,ft4 ,secs4 ,r4,p4,s4 ,r4,p4,m4 ,tons ,gun ---------------------------------------- ------------------- #h #cjj #a1iej #aaa #f1ffj #g1ijg #ahhh,m #aj #ege #a1ige #ie #e1gjj #ae1edh #ahhh,m #ab #a1jjj #b1ajj #hd #e1jdj #cj1gej #aijb #af #b1cgj #a1ige #ei #c1edj #fd1jhd ---------------------------------------- ------------------- ,,krupp ,,guns ---------------------------------------- ------------------- ,muz4 ,engy4 ,calibre,wt41 lbs4 ,muz4 ,vel4 ,ft4 ,type of ,inches ,projectile ,ft4 ,secs4 ,r4,p4,s4 ,r4,p4,m4 ,tons ,gun ---------------------------------------- ------------------- #f #b1fjj #aib #ae1ebj #c1jjj #bbb #ac1cbj #h #b1bjj #acc #g1ihj #aj #b1bej #ajh #f1dhj #ab #b1bej #ij #f1djj ---------------------------------------- ------------------- ,from the above table it will be noted that the ,r4,p4,m4 are exceedingly high in some cases4 ,upon the impact of a shell with armor-plate the physical phenomena occur instantaneously and the resultant forces are so great that it is impossible to mechanically record their action4 ,a study of the stresses in the shell can1 however1 be made on a theoretical basis4 ,in the first place1 if the projectile were twenty calibres in length and of a material offering less resistance to torsional stress than steel and rotated at the high velocities indicated we would find that upon impact the torsion would be plainly evident as per the following3 ,assume a projectile ,a of length twenty calibres1 about to penetrate an armor-plate ,b of thickness sufficient to prevent complete penetration by the shell in question4 ,illustration3 ,fig4 #bg ,the tendency of the impact is to stop the rotation of the projectile1 owing to the friction between the surfaces in contact1 but owing to the length of the projectile the point receives this retarding influence before it can be transmitted throughout the body of the shell to its base4 ,the consequent result is that the head will finally come to a stop while the base is still rotating1 however slightly that may be4 ,theoretically considering the projectile to be composed of a series of discs a line drawn parallel to the major axis1 while at rest1 would be represented by the line cd4 ,upon impact1 however1 the rotative force tends to create a twisting couple with the result that each disc will tend to slide on its preceding disc1 so that by the time these twisting couples have been transmitted to the base of the shell the original line cd will have taken some such position as de4 ,the objection to the present method of forging shells is as a result1 the grain or fibre of the metal lies parallel with the major axis of the forging1 the forging process causing an elongation of the ingot and the metal grain following the direction of elongation4 ,consequently any flaws occurring in the material will extend parallel to the grain or major axis4 ,if a flaw remains undiscovered in a finished projectile--as is sometimes the case--the projectile is not only weakened thereby1 but the element of weakness lies in such a direction that the compression forces and counterforces produce very much the same results as would a wedge driven into a niche1 i4e4 the separation of adjacent material4 ,the author is in possession of a shell in which a longitudinal flaw was revealed in the ogive by the cutting away of a longitudinal quarter section1 ,fig4 #bh4 ,illustration3 ,fig4 #bh4 ,armor-,piercing ,shell4 ,showing position of flaw4 ,there are1 therefore1 two great forces with which to contend in the design of projectiles1 to one of which1 compression1 has been given the greatest attention because of its recognized tendency to cause the base of the shell to crowd upon the head and cause the shell to break up about the ogive4 ,the other force1 torsion1 seems not to have been considered prior to the present instance1 at any rate so far as the author has been able to ascertain1 not because thought to be unimportant1 but because of oversight or failure on the part of investigators to take into consideration in this instance1 an element of reaction commonly considered in mechanical engineering practice1 as in shafting for vessels and for power transmission in shops1 etc4 ,the writer maintains that immediately upon impact the metal in a shell assumes a state of physical unrest1 due to stresses similar to those in a propeller shaft when in motion1 except that in the former case the intensity of the compression stresses greatly exceed those in the latter4 ,because a shell is only #c-a_/b calibres in length is no criterion that the same stresses do not exist there as would exist in the theoretical projectile considered of twenty calibres1 or one of even more exaggerated proportions--there would be merely a difference in the intensity of these stresses4 ,in a projectile making one complete revolution about its major axis in every twenty-five calibres flight1 any one elementary unit area or mass in that shell likewise makes one complete revolution in the same distance of travel1 and the path traversed by that unit area or mass is that of a spiral of radius equal to the distance of that unit area or mass from the major axis of the shell1 the diameter of which spiral would be the diameter of the shell in question--and the pitch twenty-five calibres--if said unit area were on the surface of the body of the shell4 ,upon impact the tendency of this unit area would be to continue its flight along the continuation of that spiral or along the line ed of our theoretical shell of twenty calibres4 ,the result would be for each disc element theoretically considered to crowd upon the next corresponding disc element and these two upon the third corresponding disc element etc41 such crowding taking place along the line ed4 ,therefore the projectile must be designed not only to penetrate1 as well as to withstand the great compressional stresses upon the advancing head of the shell but the body of the shell must be so designed as to give a maximum of integrity4 ,the torsional stresses act along ed1 and in order to resist these stresses the shell must be so designed that the resisting ability will be increased along that line1 re-acting along de4 ,this the author advocates by means of a twist forging1 in which the grain of the metal will lie co-incident with the lines of the torsional stresses1 and by the introduction of spiral ribs lying co-incident also with the lines of the torsional stresses and the grain of the twist forging manufactured by a process indicated in the patent herewith appended4 ,by the introduction of the spiral ribs it will be seen that each disc is reinforced to withstand the tendency of the disc behind to crowd upon it and that by means of a properly designed shell of this type the whole energy of the shell can be better transmitted to the point of impact by means of the spiral ribs and twisted grain4 ,furthermore1 should any flaws be present in the ingot1 their size would be reduced by the twisting1 as are the spaces between the strands of a rope when twisted in the proper direction for so doing4 ,also1 with a flaw in a finished projectile1 and lying in a spiral direction the result of the compression stresses would be to jump across the flaw or to decrease the gap instead of acting wedgelike along the flaw causing it to open as before mentioned4 ,finally1 an increase in integrity means an increase in penetrability1 or in the percentage of complete penetration1 with the ultimate necessity of increasing the thickness of armor-plate to successfully exclude the improved armor-piercing shell4 ,no4 #hfc1bdh4 ,,patented ,,aug4 #ac1 #aijg4 ,c4 ,,de ,,zafra4 ,,projectile4 ,,application ,,filed ,,dec4 #aj1 #aijf4 ,illustration3 ,,fig4 #a4 ,illustration3 ,,fig4 #b4 ,illustration3 ,,fig4 #c4 ,illustration3 ,witnesses ,names are illegible ,carlos de ,zafra ,inventor ,by his ,attorney ,hensey ,gough ,united ,states ,patent ,office ,,carlos ,,de ,,zafra1 ,,of ,,new ,,york1 ,n4,y4 ,projectile ,no4 #hfc1bdh ,,specification ,,of ,,letters ,,patent4 ,patented ,aug4 #ac1 #aijg4 ,application filed ,december #aj1 #aijf1 ,serial ,no4 #cdg1jee ,to all whom it may concern3 ,be it known that ,i1 ,,carlos ,,de ,,zafra1 a citizen of the ,united ,states1 residing at ,new ,york city1 county of ,new ,york1 and ,state of ,new ,york1 have invented certain new and useful ,improvements in ,projectiles1 of which the following is a specification4 ,my invention1 relates to an improved form of explosive shell or other projectile1 and more particularly to those projectiles which are reinforced by longitudinal ribs4 ,it further relates to a method whereby such a projectile may be made4 ,the object of my invention is to provide a shell having a maximum strength or perforating power1 together with a maximum capacity for an explosive charge1 and the invention consists in forming the projectile with the fibers or grain of the metal running in a spiral direction from the base of the shell to the top thereof1 and in reinforcing the interior of the shell with ribs which shall run in the same direction1 starting at the base of the projectile and ending at the top end of the inner chamber4 ,in the drawings1 ,figure #a is a side view of a projectile1 the grain or fiber of which is indicated by dotted lines4 ,fig4 #b is a longitudinal section showing the interior ribs4 ,fig4 #c is a transverse section on the line #c--c1 ,fig4 #b4 ,while the tendency to rupture is very much lessened by the use of straight longitudinal ribs on the interior of shells and projectiles of various kinds1 yet such a straight longitudinal rib is itself liable to a sheering and disruptive stress along transverse lines when the projectile strikes1 due to the rotative inertia of the projectile in its flight4 ,the aim of my invention is to provide ribs which will be coincident with the rotative travel of the shell so that when the point of the projectile enters an armor plate1 the stress of this sudden stoppage of rotation will be taken up along the fiber or grain of the shell and by the spiral ribs therein4 ,thus the sheering tendency of the metal in the walls of the shell is greatly reduced and greater strength is given to resist the tendency of the rear end of the shell to twist off1 due to the rotatory course when the head of the shell is embedded in an armor plate4 ,like letters in the figures designate like parts4 ,a represents the shell1 and ,b the fuse1 ,b' being the rotating band which is secured on the shell near the base in the usual way4 ,the hollow portion of the shell consists of a chamber ,c extending from the base to the forward end of the shell4 ,the walls of this chamber are provided with the ribs ,d extending from the base to the point of the chamber in a spiral direction4 ,in the drawings1 ,i have shown the pitch of this spiral as one quarter turn in the length of the chamber1 but it is to be understood that ,i may use a greater or less pitch without departing in any way from my invention4 ,i have shown a pitch of one quarter turn particularly for purposes of illustration1 as if a greater pitch had been used the section ,fig4 #b would not have shown any one rib entirely4 ,as will be seen by ,fig4 #a1 the grain or fiber of the metal is also twisted spirally in accordance with the pitch of the ribs ,d1 in this case a quarter turn from the rear end of the projectile to its point4 ,in order to manufacture a projectile of this character ,i have devised the following method which ,i deem preferable1 though ,i do not wish to limit myself thereto4 ,this consists first in casting an ingot from which the solid forging is to be produced4 ,previous to1 during or after the process of forging1 the ingot is twisted in a torsion apparatus1 one end of the ingot being held fixed while the other end is being rotated by any suitable rotative gripping mechanism through an arc of the number of degrees desired4 ,this will result in what ,i term a twist forging in which the grain or fiber will lie in any predetermined or desired spiral direction or pitch4 ,the spiral ribs which are to lie in the direction preferably parallel to the grain or fiber of the metal may now be formed by the boring process similar to that employed in the rifling of modern artillery4 ,my projectile might also be formed by forming the shell with the ribs running longitudinally there along in a direct line from front to rear and with the fiber of the metal also running in a direct line parallel with the ribs4 ,the projectile might then be reheated for forging and while being forged the rear could be held in any suitable gripping device and the forward end be rotated1 as before explained4 ,thus the fiber of the shell and the interior ribs will both be given the spiral twist desired4 ,it will be seen that with either of these processes the fiber of the shell and the spiral ribs lie parallel to each other and are most perfectly formed to resist the shock of impact1 the reaction of which will be along the line coincident with the resultant of the angular or rotative and the trajectoral velocities1 which line will lie parallel with the spiral ribs1 the pitch of such fiber and ribs having been predetermined by suitable calculation4 ,the above described methods while not claimed herein are to form the subject-matter of a separate application4 ,having described my invention what ,i claim is3 #a4 ,a projectile provided with a chamber extending along its length1 the walls of said chamber being provided with longitudinal ribs extending in a spiral direction from the base of the chamber to the forward end thereof4 #b4 ,a projectile provided with a chamber extending along its length1 the forward end of said chamber being pointed1 the walls of said chamber being provided with longitudinal ribs extending in a spiral direction from the base of the chamber to the point thereof4 #c4 ,a projectile having the fibers of its material twisted in a spiral direction from the base of said projectile to the end thereof4 #d4 ,a projectile having the fibers of its material twisted in a spiral direction from the base of said projectile to the end thereof1 said projectile having a central chamber1 the walls of which are provided with longitudinal ribs extending in a spiral direction from the base of the chamber to the point thereof4 ,in testimony whereof1 ,i have signed my name to this specification in the presence of two subscribing witnesses1 this sixth day of ,december1 #aijf4 ,,carlos ,,de ,,zafra4 ,witnesses3 ,,emilo ,,belari1 ,,emma ,,roderick4 ,bibliography ,,ordnance ,,and ,,gunnery ,,bruff ,,test ,,book ,,of ,,ordnance ,,and ,,gunnery ,,ingersoll ,,report ,,on ,,the ,,art ,,of ,,war ,,in ,,europe--#ahed-ahee-ahef ,,col4 ,r4 ,,delafield1 ,u4,s4,a4 ,,journal ,,of ,,the ,u4,s4 ,,artillery ,,the ,,scientific ,,american ,,specifications ,,of ,,the ,,bureau ,,of ,,ordnance1 ,u4,s4 ,,navy ,,department ,,specifications ,,of ,,the ,,ordnance ,,department1 ,u4,s4 ,,army ,illustration3 ,the de ,zafra ,improved ,armor-,piercing ,shell