,,the ,,novel ,,and ,,the ,,common ,,school ,by ,charles ,dudley ,warner ,there has been a great improvement in the physical condition of the people of the ,united ,states within two generations4 ,this is more noticeable in the ,west than in the ,east1 but it is marked everywhere2 and the foreign traveler who once detected a race deterioration1 which he attributed to a dry and stimulating atmosphere and to a feverish anxiety1 which was evident in all classes1 for a rapid change of condition1 finds very little now to sustain his theory4 ,although the restless energy continues1 the mixed race in ,america has certainly changed physically for the better4 ,speaking generally1 the contours of face and form are more rounded4 ,the change is most marked in regions once noted for leanness1 angularity1 and sallowness of complexion1 but throughout the country the types of physical manhood are more numerous2 and if women of rare and exceptional beauty are not more numerous1 no doubt the average of comeliness and beauty has been raised4 ,thus far1 the increase of beauty due to better development has not been at the expense of delicacy of complexion and of line1 as it has been in some ,european countries4 ,physical well-being is almost entirely a matter of nutrition4 ,something is due in our case to the accumulation of money1 to the decrease in an increasing number of our population of the daily anxiety about food and clothes1 to more leisure2 but abundant and better-prepared food is the direct agency in our physical change4 ,good food is not only more abundant and more widely distributed than it was two generations ago1 but it is to be had in immeasurably greater variety4 ,no other people existing1 or that ever did exist1 could command such a variety of edible products for daily consumption as the mass of the ,american people habitually use today4 ,in consequence they have the opportunity of being better nourished than any other people ever were4 ,if they are not better nourished1 it is because their food is badly prepared4 ,whenever we find1 either in ,new ,england or in the ,south1 a community ill-favored1 dyspeptic1 lean1 and faded in complexion1 we may be perfectly sure that its cooking is bad1 and that it is too ignorant of the laws of health to procure that variety of food which is so easily obtainable4 ,people who still diet on sodden pie and the products of the frying-pan of the pioneer1 and then1 in order to promote digestion1 attempt to imitate the patient cow by masticating some elastic and fragrant gum1 are doing very little to bring in that universal physical health or beauty which is the natural heritage of our opportunity4 ,now1 what is the relation of our intellectual development to this physical improvement8 ,it will be said that the general intelligence is raised1 that the habit of reading is much more widespread1 and that the increase of books1 periodicals1 and newspapers shows a greater mental activity than existed formerly4 ,it will also be said that the opportunity for education was never before so nearly universal4 ,if it is not yet true everywhere that all children must go to school1 it is true that all may go to school free of cost4 ,without doubt1 also1 great advance has been made in ,american scholarship1 in specialized learning and investigation2 that is to say1 the proportion of scholars of the first rank in literature and in science is much larger to the population than a generation ago4 ,but what is the relation of our general intellectual life to popular education8 ,or1 in other words1 what effect is popular education having upon the general intellectual habit and taste8 ,there are two ways of testing this4 ,one is by observing whether the mass of minds is better trained and disciplined than formerly1 less liable to delusions1 better able to detect fallacies1 more logical1 and less likely to be led away by novelties in speculation1 or by theories that are unsupported by historic evidence or that are contradicted by a knowledge of human nature4 ,if we were tempted to pursue this test1 we should be forced to note the seeming anomaly of a scientific age peculiarly credulous2 the ease with which any charlatan finds followers2 the common readiness to fall in with any theory of progress which appeals to the sympathies1 and to accept the wildest notions of social reorganization4 ,we should be obliged to note also1 among scientific men themselves1 a disposition to come to conclusions on inadequate evidence--a disposition usually due to one-sided education which lacks metaphysical training and the philosophic habit4 ,multitudes of fairly intelligent people are afloat without any base-line of thought to which they can refer new suggestions2 just as many politicians are floundering about for want of an apprehension of the ,constitution of the ,united ,states and of the historic development of society4 ,an honest acceptance of the law of gravitation would banish many popular delusions2 a comprehension that something cannot be made out of nothing would dispose of others2 and the application of the ordinary principles of evidence1 such as men require to establish a title to property1 would end most of the remaining4 ,how far is our popular education1 which we have now enjoyed for two full generations1 responsible for this state of mind8 ,if it has not encouraged it1 has it done much to correct it8 ,the other test of popular education is in the kind of reading sought and enjoyed by the majority of the ,american people4 ,as the greater part of this reading is admitted to be fiction1 we have before us the relation of the novel to the common school4 ,as the common school is our universal method of education1 and the novels most in demand are those least worthy to be read1 we may consider this subject in two aspects3 the encouragement1 by neglect or by teaching1 of the taste that demands this kind of fiction1 and the tendency of the novel to become what this taste demands4 ,before considering the common school1 however1 we have to notice a phenomenon in letters--namely1 the evolution of the modern newspaper as a vehicle for general reading-matter4 ,not content with giving the news1 or even with creating news and increasing its sensational character1 it grasps at the wider field of supplying reading material for the million1 usurping the place of books and to a large extent of periodicals4 ,the effect of this new departure in journalism is beginning to attract attention4 ,an increasing number of people read nothing except the newspapers4 ,consequently1 they get little except scraps and bits2 no subject is considered thoroughly or exhaustively2 and they are furnished with not much more than the small change for superficial conversation4 ,the habit of excessive newspaper reading1 in which a great variety of topics is inadequately treated1 has a curious effect on the mind4 ,it becomes demoralized1 gradually loses the power of concentration or of continuous thought1 and even loses the inclination to read the long articles which the newspaper prints4 ,the eye catches a thousand things1 but is detained by no one4 ,variety1 which in limitations is wholesome in literary as well as in physical diet1 creates dyspepsia when it is excessive1 and when the literary viands are badly cooked and badly served the evil is increased4 ,the mind loses the power of discrimination1 the taste is lowered1 and the appetite becomes diseased4 ,the effect of this scrappy1 desultory reading is bad enough when the hashed compound selected is tolerably good4 ,it becomes a very serious matter when the reading itself is vapid1 frivolous1 or bad4 ,the responsibility of selecting the mental food for millions of people is serious4 ,when1 in the last century1 in ,england1 the ,society for the ,diffusion of ,useful ,information1 which accomplished so much good1 was organized1 this responsibility was felt1 and competent hands prepared the popular books and pamphlets that were cheap in price and widely diffused4 ,now1 it happens that a hundred thousand people1 perhaps a million in some cases1 surrender the right of the all-important selection of the food for their minds to some unknown and irresponsible person whose business it is to choose the miscellaneous reading-matter for a particular newspaper4 ,his or her taste may be good1 or it may be immature and vicious2 it may be used simply to create a sensation2 and yet the million of readers get nothing except what this one person chooses they shall read4 ,it is an astonishing abdication of individual preference4 ,day after day1 ,sunday after ,sunday1 they read only what this unknown person selects for them4 ,instead of going to the library and cultivating their own tastes1 and pursuing some subject that will increase their mental vigor and add to their permanent stock of thought1 they fritter away their time upon a hash of literature chopped up for them by a person possibly very unfit even to make good hash4 ,the mere statement of this surrender of one's judgment of what shall be his intellectual life is alarming4 ,but the modern newspaper is no doubt a natural evolution in our social life4 ,as everything has a cause1 it would be worth while to inquire whether the encyclopaedic newspaper is in response to a demand1 to a taste created by our common schools4 ,or1 to put the question in another form1 does the system of education in our common schools give the pupils a taste for good literature or much power of discrimination8 ,do they come out of school with the habit of continuous reading1 of reading books1 or only of picking up scraps in the newspapers1 as they might snatch a hasty meal at a lunch-counter8 ,what1 in short1 do the schools contribute to the creation of a taste for good literature8 ,great anxiety is felt in many quarters about the modern novel4 ,it is feared that it will not be realistic enough1 that it will be too realistic1 that it will be insincere as to the common aspects of life1 that it will not sufficiently idealize life to keep itself within the limits of true art4 ,but while the critics are busy saying what the novel should be1 and attacking or defending the fiction of the previous age1 the novel obeys pretty well the laws of its era1 and in many ways1 especially in the variety of its development1 represents the time4 ,regarded simply as a work of art1 it may be said that the novel should be an expression of the genius of its writer conscientiously applied to a study of the facts of life and of human nature1 with little reference to the audience4 ,perhaps the great works of art that have endured have been so composed4 ,we may say1 for example1 that ,don ,quixote had to create its sympathetic audience4 ,but1 on the other hand1 works of art worthy the name are sometimes produced to suit a demand and to please a taste already created4 ,a great deal of what passes for literature in these days is in this category of supply to suit the demand1 and perhaps it can be said of this generation more fitly than of any other that the novel seeks to hit the popular taste2 having become a means of livelihood1 it must sell in order to be profitable to the producer1 and in order to sell it must be what the reading public want4 ,the demand and sale are widely taken as the criterion of excellence1 or they are at least sufficient encouragement of further work on the line of the success4 ,this criterion is accepted by the publisher1 whose business it is to supply a demand4 ,the conscientious publisher asks two questions3 ,is the book good8 and ,will it sell8 ,the publisher without a conscience asks only one question3 ,will the book sell8 ,the reflex influence of this upon authors is immediately felt4 ,the novel1 mediocre1 banal1 merely sensational1 and worthless for any purpose of intellectual stimulus or elevation of the ideal1 is thus encouraged in this age as it never was before4 ,the making of novels has become a process of manufacture4 ,usually1 after the fashion of the silk-weavers of ,lyons1 they are made for the central establishment on individual looms at home2 but if demand for the sort of goods furnished at present continues1 there is no reason why they should not be produced1 even more cheaply than they are now1 in great factories1 where there can be division of labor and economy of talent4 ,the shoal of ,english novels conscientiously reviewed every seventh day in the ,london weeklies would preserve their present character and gain in firmness of texture if they were made by machinery4 ,one has only to mark what sort of novels reach the largest sale and are most called for in the circulating libraries1 to gauge pretty accurately the public taste1 and to measure the influence of this taste upon modern production4 ,with the exception of the novel now and then which touches some religious problem or some socialistic speculation or uneasiness1 or is a special freak of sensationalism1 the novels which suit the greatest number of readers are those which move in a plane of absolute mediocrity1 and have the slightest claim to be considered works of art4 ,they represent the chromo stage of development4 ,they must be cheap4 ,the almost universal habit of reading is a mark of this age--nowhere else so conspicuous as in ,america2 and considering the training of this comparatively new reading public1 it is natural that it should insist upon cheapness of material1 and that it should require quality less than quantity4 ,it is a note of our general intellectual development that cheapness in literature is almost as much insisted on by the rich as by the poor4 ,the taste for a good book has not kept pace with the taste for a good dinner1 and multitudes who have commendable judgment about the table would think it a piece of extravagance to pay as much for a book as for a dinner1 and would be ashamed to smoke a cigar that cost less than a novel4 ,indeed1 we seem to be as yet far away from the appreciation of the truth that what we put into the mind is as important to our well-being as what we put into the stomach4 ,no doubt there are more people capable of appreciating a good book1 and there are more good books read1 in this age1 than in any previous1 though the ratio of good judges to the number who read is less2 but we are considering the vast mass of the reading public and its tastes4 ,i say its tastes1 and probably this is not unfair1 although this traveling1 restless1 reading public meekly takes1 as in the case of the reading selected in the newspapers1 what is most persistently thrust upon its attention by the great news agencies1 which find it most profitable to deal in that which is cheap and ephemeral4 ,the houses which publish books of merit are at a disadvantage with the distributing agencies4 ,criticism which condemns the common-school system as a nurse of superficiality1 mediocrity1 and conceit does not need serious attention1 any more than does the criticism that the universal opportunity of individual welfare offered by a republic fails to make a perfect government4 ,but this is not saying that the common school does all that it can do1 and that its results answer to the theories about it4 ,it must be partly due to the want of proper training in the public schools that there are so few readers of discrimination1 and that the general taste1 judged by the sort of books now read1 is so mediocre4 ,most of the public schools teach reading1 or have taught it1 so poorly that the scholars who come from them cannot read easily2 hence they must have spice1 and blood1 and vice to stimulate them1 just as a man who has lost taste peppers his food4 ,we need not agree with those who say that there is no merit whatever in the mere ability to read2 nor1 on the other hand1 can we join those who say that the art of reading will pretty surely encourage a taste for the nobler kind of reading1 and that the habit of reading trash will by-and-by lead the reader to better things4 ,as a matter of experience1 the reader of the namby-pamby does not acquire an appetite for anything more virile1 and the reader of the sensational requires constantly more highly flavored viands4 ,nor is it reasonable to expect good taste to be recovered by an indulgence in bad taste4 ,what1 then1 does the common school usually do for literary taste8 ,generally there is no thought about it4 ,it is not in the minds of the majority of teachers1 even if they possess it themselves4 ,the business is to teach the pupils to read2 how they shall use the art of reading is little considered4 ,if we examine the reading-books from the lowest grade to the highest1 we shall find that their object is to teach words1 not literature4 ,the lower-grade books are commonly inane 7,i will not say childish1 for that is a libel on the open minds of children7 beyond description4 ,there is an impression that advanced readers have improved much in quality within a few years1 and doubtless some of them do contain specimens of better literature than their predecessors4 ,but they are on the old plan1 which must be radically modified or entirely cast aside1 and doubtless will be when the new method is comprehended1 and teachers are well enough furnished to cut loose from the machine4 ,we may say that to learn how to read1 and not what to read1 is confessedly the object of these books2 but even this object is not attained4 ,there is an endeavor to teach how to call the words of a reading-book1 but not to teach how to read2 for reading involves1 certainly for the older scholars1 the combination of known words to form new ideas4 ,this is lacking4 ,the taste for good literature is not developed2 the habit of continuous pursuit of a subject1 with comprehension of its relations1 is not acquired2 and no conception is gained of the entirety of literature or its importance to human life4 ,consequently1 there is no power of judgment or faculty of discrimination4 ,now1 this radical defect can be easily remedied if the school authorities only clearly apprehend one truth1 and that is that the minds of children of tender age can be as readily interested and permanently interested in good literature as in the dreary feebleness of the juvenile reader4 ,the mind of the ordinary child should not be judged by the mind that produces stuff of this sort3 ,little ,jimmy had a little white pig4 ,did the little pig know ,jimmy8 ,yes1 the little pig knew ,jimmy1 and would come when he called4 ,how did little ,jimmy know his pig from the other little pigs8 ,by the twist in his tail4 7,children1 asks the teacher1 what is the meaning of 'twist'87 ,jimmy liked to stride the little pig's back4 ,would the little pig let him8 ,yes1 when he was absorbed eating his dinner4 7,children1 what is the meaning of 'absorbed'87 ,and so on4 ,this intellectual exercise is1 perhaps1 read to children who have not got far enough in word-building to read themselves about little ,jimmy and his absorbed pig4 ,it may be continued1 together with word-learning1 until the children are able to say 7is it reading87 the entire volume of this precious stuff4 ,to what end8 ,the children are only languidly interested2 their minds are not awakened2 the imagination is not appealed to2 they have learned nothing1 except probably some new words1 which are learned as signs4 ,often children have only one book even of this sort1 at which they are kept until they learn it through by heart1 and they have been heard to read it with the book bottom side up or shut6 ,all these books cultivate inattention and intellectual vacancy4 ,they are--the best of them--only reading exercises2 and reading is not perceived to have any sort of value4 ,the child is not taught to think1 and not a step is taken in informing him of his relation to the world about him4 ,his education is not begun4 ,now it happens that children go on with this sort of reading and the ordinary text-books through the grades of the district school into the high school1 and come to the ages of seventeen and eighteen without the least conception of literature1 or of art1 or of the continuity of the relations of history2 are ignorant of the great names which illuminate the ages2 have never heard of ,socrates1 or of ,phidias1 or of ,titian2 do not know whether ,franklin was an ,englishman or an ,american2 would be puzzled to say whether it was ,ben ,franklin or ,ben ,jonson who invented lightning--think it was ,ben ,somebody2 cannot tell whether they lived before or after ,christ1 and indeed never have thought that anything happened before the time of ,christ2 do not know who was on the throne of ,spain when ,columbus discovered ,america--and so on4 ,these are not imagined instances4 ,the children referred to are in good circumstances and have had fairly intelligent associations1 but their education has been intrusted to the schools4 ,they know nothing except their text-books1 and they know these simply for the purpose of examination4 ,such pupils come to the age of eighteen with not only no taste for the best reading1 for the reading of books1 but without the ability to be interested even in fiction of the first class1 because it is full of allusions that convey nothing to their minds4 ,the stories they read1 if they read at all--the novels1 so called1 that they have been brought up on--are the diluted and feeble fictions that flood the country1 and that scarcely rise above the intellectual level of ,jimmy and the absorbed pig4 ,it has been demonstrated by experiment that it is as easy to begin with good literature as with the sort of reading described4 ,it makes little difference where the beginning is made4 ,any good book1 any real book1 is an open door into the wide field of literature2 that is to say1 of history--that is to say1 of interest in the entire human race4 ,read to children of tender years1 the same day1 the story of ,jimmy and a ,greek myth1 or an episode from the ,odyssey1 or any genuine bit of human nature and life2 and ask the children next day which they wish to hear again4 ,almost all of them will call for the repetition of the real thing1 the verity of which they recognize1 and which has appealed to their imaginations4 ,but this is not all4 ,if the subject is a ,greek myth1 they speedily come to comprehend its meaning1 and by the aid of the teacher to trace its development elsewhere1 to understand its historic significance1 to have the mind filled with images of beauty1 and wonder4 ,is it the ,homeric story of ,nausicaa8 ,what a picture6 ,how speedily ,greek history opens to the mind6 ,how readily the children acquire knowledge of the great historic names1 and see how their deeds and their thoughts are related to our deeds and our thoughts6 ,it is as easy to know about ,socrates as about ,franklin and ,general ,grant4 ,having the mind open to other times and to the significance of great men in history1 how much more clearly they comprehend ,franklin and ,grant and ,lincoln6 ,nor is this all4 ,the young mind is open to noble thoughts1 to high conceptions2 it follows by association easily along the historic and literary line2 and not only do great names and fine pieces of literature become familiar1 but the meaning of the continual life in the world begins to be apprehended4 ,this is not at all a fancy sketch4 ,the writer has seen the whole assembly of pupils in a school of six hundred1 of all the eight grades1 intelligently interested in a talk which contained classical and literary allusions that would have been incomprehensible to an ordinary school brought up on the ordinary readers and text-books4 ,but the reading need not be confined to the classics nor to the master-pieces of literature4 ,natural history--generally the most fascinating of subjects--can be taught2 interest in flowers and trees and birds and the habits of animals can be awakened by reading the essays of literary men on these topics as they never can be by the dry text-books4 ,the point ,i wish to make is that real literature for the young1 literature which is almost absolutely neglected in the public schools1 except in a scrappy way as a reading exercise1 is the best open door to the development of the mind and to knowledge of all sorts4 ,the unfolding of a ,greek myth leads directly to art1 to love of beauty1 to knowledge of history1 to an understanding of ourselves4 ,but whatever the beginning is1 whether a classic myth1 a ,homeric epic1 a play of ,sophocles1 the story of the life and death of ,socrates1 a mediaeval legend1 or any genuine piece of literature from the time of ,virgil down to our own1 it may not so much matter 7except that it is better to begin with the ancients in order to gain a proper perspective7 whatever the beginning is1 it should be the best literature4 ,the best is not too good for the youngest child4 ,simplicity1 which commonly characterizes greatness1 is of course essential4 ,but never was a greater mistake made than in thinking that a youthful mind needs watering with the slops ordinarily fed to it4 ,even children in the kindergarten are eager for ,whittier's ,barefoot ,boy and ,longfellow's ,hiawatha4 ,it requires1 ,i repeat1 little more pains to create a good taste in reading than a bad taste4 ,it would seem that in the complete organization of the public schools all education of the pupil is turned over to them as it was not formerly1 and it is possible that in the stress of text-book education there is no time for reading at home4 ,the competent teachers contend not merely with the difficulty of the lack of books and the deficiencies of those in use1 but with the more serious difficulty of the erroneous ideas of the function of text-books4 ,they will cease to be a commercial commodity of so much value as now when teachers teach4 ,if it is true that there is no time for reading at home1 we can account for the deplorable lack of taste in the great mass of the reading public educated at the common schools2 and we can see exactly what the remedy should be--namely1 the teaching of the literature at the beginning of school life1 and following it up broadly and intelligently during the whole school period4 ,it will not crowd out anything else1 because it underlies everything4 ,after many years of perversion and neglect1 to take up the study of literature in a comprehensive text-book1 as if it were to be learned--like arithmetic1 is a ludicrous proceeding4 ,this1 is not teaching literature nor giving the scholar a love of good reading4 ,it is merely stuffing the mind with names and dates1 which are not seen to have any relation to present life1 and which speedily fade out of the mind4 ,the love of literature is not to be attained in this way1 nor in any way except by reading the best literature4 ,the notion that literature can be taken up as a branch of education1 and learned at the proper time and when studies permit1 is one of the most farcical in our scheme of education4 ,it is only matched in absurdity by the other current idea1 that literature is something separate and apart from general knowledge4 ,here is the whole body of accumulated thought and experience of all the ages1 which indeed forms our present life and explains it1 existing partly in tradition and training1 but more largely in books2 and most teachers think1 and most pupils are led to believe1 that this most important former of the mind1 maker of character1 and guide to action can be acquired in a certain number of lessons out of a textbook6 ,because this is so1 young men and young women come up to college almost absolutely ignorant of the history of their race and of the ideas that have made our civilization4 ,some of them have never read a book1 except the text-books on the specialties in which they have prepared themselves for examination4 ,we have a saying concerning people whose minds appear to be made up of dry1 isolated facts1 that they have no atmosphere4 ,well1 literature is the atmosphere4 ,in it we live1 and move1 and have our being1 intellectually4 ,the first lesson read to1 or read by1 the child should begin to put him in relation with the world and the thought of the world4 ,this cannot be done except by the living teacher4 ,no text-book1 no one reading-book or series of reading-books1 will do it4 ,if the teacher is only the text-book orally delivered1 the teacher is an uninspired machine4 ,we must revise our notions of the function of the teacher for the beginners4 ,the teacher is to present evidence of truth1 beauty1 art4 ,where will he or she find it8 ,why1 in experimental science1 if you please1 in history1 but1 in short1 in good literature1 using the word in its broadest sense4 ,the object in selecting reading for children is to make it impossible for them to see any evidence except the best4 ,that is the teacher's business1 and how few understand their business6 ,how few are educated6 ,in the best literature we find truth about the world1 about human nature2 and hence1 if children read that1 they read what their experience will verify4 ,i am told that publishers are largely at fault for the quality of the reading used in schools--that schools would gladly receive the good literature if they could get it4 ,but ,i do not know1 in this case1 how much the demand has to do with the supply4 ,i am certain1 however1 that educated teachers would use only the best means for forming the minds and enlightening the understanding of their pupils4 ,it must be kept in mind that reading1 silent reading done by the scholar1 is not learning signs and calling words2 it is getting thought4 ,if children are to get thought1 they should be served with the best--that which will not only be true1 but appeal so naturally to their minds that they will prefer it to all meaner stuff4 ,if it is true that children cannot acquire this taste at home--and it is true for the vast majority of ,american children--then it must be given in the public schools4 ,to give it is not to interrupt the acquisition of other knowledge2 it is literally to open the door to all knowledge4 ,when this truth is recognized in the common schools1 and literature is given its proper place1 not only for the development of the mind1 but as the most easily-opened door to history1 art1 science1 general intelligence1 we shall see the taste of the reading public in the ,united ,states undergo a mighty change3 ,it will not care for the fiction it likes at present1 and which does little more than enfeeble its powers2 and then there can be no doubt that fiction will rise to supply the demand for something better4 ,when the trash does not sell1 the trash will not be produced1 and those who are only capable of supplying the present demand will perhaps find a more useful occupation4 ,it will be again evident that literature is not a trade1 but an art requiring peculiar powers and patient training4 ,when people know how to read1 authors will need to know how to write4 ,in all other pursuits we carefully study the relation of supply to demand4 ,why not in literature8 ,formerly1 when readers were comparatively few1 and were of a class that had leisure and the opportunity of cultivating the taste1 books were generally written for this class1 and aimed at its real or supposed capacities4 ,if the age was coarse in speech or specially affected in manner1 the books followed the lead given by the demand2 but1 coarse or affected1 they had the quality of art demanded by the best existing cultivation4 ,naturally1 when the art of reading is acquired by the great mass of the people1 whose taste has not been cultivated1 the supply for this increased demand will1 more or less1 follow the level of its intelligence4 ,after our civil war there was a patriotic desire to commemorate the heroic sacrifices of our soldiers in monuments1 and the deeds of our great captains in statues4 ,this noble desire was not usually accompanied by artistic discrimination1 and the land is filled with monuments and statues which express the gratitude of the people4 ,the coming age may wish to replace them by images and structures which will express gratitude and patriotism in a higher because more artistic form4 ,in the matter of art the development is distinctly reflex4 ,the exhibition of works of genius will slowly instruct and elevate the popular taste1 and in time the cultivated popular taste will reject mediocrity and demand better things4 ,only a little while ago few people in the ,united ,states knew how to draw1 and only a few could tell good drawing from bad4 ,to realize the change that has taken place1 we have only to recall the illustrations in books1 magazines1 and comic newspapers of less than a quarter of a century ago4 ,foreign travel1 foreign study1 and the importation of works of art 7still blindly restricted by the ,american ,congress7 were the lessons that began to work a change4 ,now1 in all our large towns1 and even in hundreds of villages1 there are well-established art schools2 in the greater cities1 unions and associations1 under the guidance of skillful artists1 where five or six hundred young men and women are diligently1 day and night1 learning the rudiments of art4 ,the result is already apparent4 ,excellent drawing is seen in illustrations for books and magazines1 in the satirical and comic publications1 even in the advertisements and theatrical posters4 ,at our present rate of progress1 the drawings in all our amusing weeklies will soon be as good as those in the ',fliegende ,blatter4' ,the change is marvelous2 and the popular taste has so improved that it would not be profitable to go back to the ill-drawn illustrations of twenty years ago4 ,but as to fiction1 even if the writers of it were all trained in it as an art1 it is not so easy to lift the public taste to their artistic level4 ,the best supply in this case will only very slowly affect the quality of the demand4 ,when the poor novel sells vastly better than the good novel1 the poor will be produced to supply the demand1 the general taste will be still further lowered1 and the power of discrimination fade out more and more4 ,what is true of the novel is true of all other literature4 ,taste for it must be cultivated in childhood4 ,the common schools must do for literature what the art schools are doing for art4 ,not every one can become an artist1 not every one can become a writer--though this is contrary to general opinion2 but knowledge to distinguish good drawing from bad can be acquired by most people1 and there are probably few minds that cannot1 by right methods applied early1 be led to prefer good literature1 and to have an enjoyment in it in proportion to its sincerity1 naturalness1 verity1 and truth to life4 ,it is1 perhaps1 too much to say that all the ,american novel needs for its development is an audience1 but it is safe to say that an audience would greatly assist it4 ,evidence is on all sides of a fresh1 new1 wonderful artistic development in ,america in drawing1 painting1 sculpture1 in instrumental music and singing1 and in literature4 ,the promise of this is not only in the climate1 the free republican opportunity1 the mixed races blending the traditions and aptitudes of so many civilizations1 but it is in a certain temperament which we already recognize as ,american4 ,it is an artistic tendency4 ,this was first most noticeable in ,american women1 to whom the art of dress seemed to come by nature1 and the art of being agreeable to be easily acquired4 ,already writers have arisen who illustrate this artistic tendency in novels1 and especially in short stories4 ,they have not appeared to owe their origin to any special literary centre2 they have come forward in the ,south1 the ,west1 the ,east4 ,their writings have to a great degree 7considering our pupilage to the literature of ,great ,britain1 which is prolonged by the lack of an international copyright7 the stamp of originality1 of naturalness1 of sincerity1 of an attempt to give the facts of life with a sense of their artistic value4 ,their affiliation is rather with the new literatures of ,france1 of ,russia1 of ,spain1 than with the modern fiction of ,england4 ,they have to compete in the market with the uncopyrighted literature of all other lands1 good and bad1 especially bad1 which is sold for little more than the cost of the paper it is printed on1 and badly printed at that4 ,but besides this fact1 and owing to a public taste not cultivated or not corrected in the public schools1 their books do not sell in anything like the quantity that the inferior1 mediocre1 other home novels sell4 ,indeed1 but for the intervention of the magazines1 few of the best writers of novels and short stories could earn as much as the day laborer earns4 ,in sixty millions of people1 all of whom are1 or have been1 in reach of the common school1 it must be confessed that their audience is small4 ,this relation between the fiction that is1 and that which is to be1 and the common school is not fanciful4 ,the lack in the general reading public1 in the novels read by the greater number of people1 and in the common school is the same--the lack of inspiration and ideality4 ,the common school does not cultivate the literary sense1 the general public lacks literary discrimination1 and the stories and tales either produced by or addressed to those who have little ideality simply respond to the demand of the times4 ,it is already evident1 both in positive and negative results1 both in the schools and the general public taste1 that literature cannot be set aside in the scheme of education2 nay1 that it is of the first importance4 ,the teacher must be able to inspire the pupil2 not only to awaken eagerness to know1 but to kindle the imagination4 ,the value of the ,hindoo or the ,greek myth1 of the ,roman story1 of the mediaeval legend1 of the heroic epic1 of the lyric poem1 of the classic biography1 of any genuine piece of literature1 ancient or modern1 is not in the knowledge of it as we may know the rules of grammar and arithmetic or the formulas of a science1 but in the enlargement of the mind to a conception of the life and development of the race1 to a study of the motives of human action1 to a comprehension of history2 so that the mind is not simply enriched1 but becomes discriminating1 and able to estimate the value of events and opinions4 ,this office for the mind acquaintance with literature can alone perform4 ,so that1 in school1 literature is not only1 as ,i have said1 the easiest open door to all else desirable1 the best literature is not only the best means of awakening the young mind1 the stimulus most congenial1 but it is the best foundation for broad and generous culture4 ,indeed1 without its co-ordinating influence the education of the common school is a thing of shreds and patches4 ,besides1 the mind aroused to historic consciousness1 kindled in itself by the best that has been said and done in all ages1 is more apt in the pursuit1 intelligently1 of any specialty2 so that the shortest road to the practical education so much insisted on in these days begins in the awakening of the faculties in the manner described4 ,there is no doubt of the value of manual training as an aid in giving definiteness1 directness1 exactness to the mind1 but mere technical training alone will be barren of those results1 in general discriminating culture1 which we hope to see in ,america4 ,the common school is a machine of incalculable value4 ,it is not1 however1 automatic4 ,if it is a mere machine1 it will do little more to lift the nation than the mere ability to read will lift it4 ,it can easily be made to inculcate a taste for good literature2 it can be a powerful influence in teaching the ,american people what to read2 and upon a broadened1 elevated1 discriminating public taste depends the fate of ,american art1 of ,american fiction4 ,it is not an inappropriate corollary to be drawn from this that an elevated public taste will bring about a truer estimate of the value of a genuine literary product4 ,an invention which increases or cheapens the conveniences or comforts of life may be a fortune to its originator4 ,a book which amuses1 or consoles1 or inspires2 which contributes to the highest intellectual enjoyment of hundreds of thousands of people2 which furnishes substance for thought or for conversation2 which dispels the cares and lightens the burdens of life2 which is a friend when friends fail1 a companion when other intercourse wearies or is impossible1 for a year1 for a decade1 for a generation perhaps1 in a world which has a proper sense of values1 will bring a like competence to its author4 7#ahij47