,,monophysitism ,,pa/ ,,& ,,pres5t ,a ,,/udy ,,9 ,,*ri/ology ,,by ,a4 ,a4 ,,luce1 ,m4,c41 ,d4,d4 ,,capta9 ,,late #ab,,? ,,royal ,,iri% ,,rifles ,,fell[ ,,( ,,tr9ity ,,college1 ,,dubl9 ,,london ,,society ,,= ,,promot+ ,,*ri/ian ,,k ,,new ,,york3 ,,! ,,macmillan ,,co4 #aibj ,,pr9t$ ,,by ,,william ,,cl[es ,,& ,,sons1 ,,limit$1 ,,london ,,& ,,beccles ,,cont5ts ,,*apt] ,i4 ,,! ,,metaphysical ,,basis ,,( ,,monophysitism ,,ii4 ,,! ,,orig9s ,,( ,,monophysitism ,,iii4 ,,monophysite ,,doctr9e ,,iv4 ,,! ,,e?os ,,( ,,monophysitism ,v4 ,,monophysitism ,,& ,,mod]n ,,psy*ology ,,vi4 ,,monophysitism ,,9 ,,! ,,pres5t ,,day ,,books ,,consult$ ,,9 ,,! ,,prep>ation ,,( ,,?is ,,essay ,j4 ,s4 ,,assemani1 ,biblio!ca ,ori5talis1 especially ! ,introductory ,diss]tation to ,vol4 ,,ii4 ,a4 ,,h>nack1 ,hi/ory ( ,dogma1 translat$ by ,speirs & ,mill>4 ,j4 ,c4 ,,rob]tson1 ,hi/ory ( ! ,*ri/ian ,*ur*4 ,,w9delb&1 ,hi/ory ( ,philosophy1 translat$ by ,tufts4 ,,wright1 ,%ort ,hi/ory ( ,syriac ,lit]ature4 ,h4 ,,b]gson1 ,les donnes immdiates de la consci5ce1 ,matire et ,mmoire1 ,l'volution cratrice4 ,,monophysitism ,,pa/ ,,& ,,pres5t ,,*apt] ,i ,,! ,,metaphysical ,,basis ,,( ,,monophysitism ,monophysitism 0 a ,*ri/ological h]esy ( ! fif? c5tury4 ,x 0 condemn$ by ! *ur* 9 ! middle ( t c5tury at ! c\ncil ( ,*alc$on4 ,surviv+ its condemnation x fl\ri%$ 9 ! ,ea/ = sev]al c5turies4 ,its adh]5ts =m$ !mselves into a p[]ful *ur* ) ord]s & succession ( _! own4 ,al?\gh ! monophysite *ur* has long s9ce lo/ all influ5ce1 x is /ill 9 be+4 ,! ,coptic & ,jacobite *ur*es ( ,egypt & ,mesopotamia1 respectively1 pres]ve to ?is day ! doctr9es & traditions ( ! primitive monophysites4 ,! hi/ory ( ! sect1 h[ev]1 does n conc]n u "h4 ,! writ]'s purpose is to review its doctr9e4 ,monophysitism is a sy/em ( religi\s ?\ght1 &1 z su*1 its importance is out ( all proportion to ! pres5t or ev5 ! pa/ position ( ! *ur*es t pr(ess$ x4 ,its significance lies 9 its univ]sality4 ,x is gr\nd$ 9 ! nature ( ! human m9d4 ,x is f\nd 9 ,we/ z well z ,ea/1 to-day z well z 9 ! e>ly c5turies ( our era4 ,:]ev] m5 br+ intellect to be> on ! problem ( ,*ri/'s be+1 ! t5d5cy to reg>d ,him z monophysite is pres5t4 ,an exam9ation ( ! h]esy is ( practical value4 ,our subject-matt] is n an ori5tal antique or a curiosity ( ! intellect1 b a pres5t-day problem ( vital mom5t to ! ,fai?4 ,if we are conc]n$ ) a half-=gott5 h]esy1 x is because a /udy ( t h]esy s]ves bo? z a prev5tive aga9/ error & z an introduction to ! tru?4 ,! doctor /udies disease to asc]ta9 ! conditions ( heal?2 pa?ological cases are (t5 8 sure/ guide to ! normal2 j s ! /udy ( h]esy is ! be/ guide to or?odox ,*ri/ology4 ,x 0 9 conflict ) monophysitism t ! *ur* ( ! fif? c5tury br\ght to completion h] dogmatic utt]ances ab\t ,*ri/2 & ! individual ?9k] to-day c ga9 ! sure/ grasp ( true ,*ri/ology by exam9+ ! monophysite p]v]sion4 ,) ?is practical purpose 9 view1 we n[ proce$ to an analysis ( ! h]esy4 ,monophysitism is a body ( doctr9e4 ,x is a dogmatic sy/em1 9 :i* ! individual dogmata are controll$ by a pr9ciple or dom9ant idea4 ,z all ! p>ticul> doctr9es ( monophysitism dep5d on ?is pr9ciple1 &1 z x is n prop]ly a !ological concept1 b "o borr[$ f philosophy1 we may call x ! metaphysical basis ( monophysitism4 ,an intellig5t grasp ( ?is basic pr9ciple is necess>y to an appreciation ( ! :ole sy/em4 ,accord+ly1 our fir/ conc]n is to asc]ta9 & exhibit ?is metaphysical basis4 ,9 subsequ5t *apt]s we %all analyse 9 detail ! doctr9es specifically monophysite & trace ! ,*ri/ological errors back to _! s\rce 9 metaphysic4 ,,! ,a ,,priori ,,& ,a ,,po/]iori ,,9 ,,*ri/ology ,! foll[+ consid]ations prove ! necessity ( ?is proc$ure4 ,two me?ods ( exam9+ ! be+ ( ,*ri/ c be di/+ui%$4 ,accord+ to ! "o me?od ! facts ( ,8 life are review$ z !y are pres5t$ 9 ! ,new ,te/am5t1 & a =mula is !n con/ruct$ to fit !m4 ,! o!r me?od />ts f ! concept ( a m$iator betwe5 ,god & man4 ,x supposes t concept actualis$1 & asks ! "q1 ,( :at nature mu/ su* a m$iator be8 ,^! me?ods may be di/+ui%$1 b !y _c be sep>at$4 ,no "o1 h[ev] sci5tific1 c come to a /udy ( ! life ( ,jesus ) an absolutely op5 m9d4 ,presuppositions are inevitable4 ,simil>ly1 z ! a priori ?9k] develops 8 concept ( a m$iator1 he comp>es ! results ( 8 ?9k+ at e /age ) ! picture pres5t$ 9 ! ,gospel /ory1 & t picture unavoidably modifies 8 d$uctions4 ,bo? diphysite & monophysite us$ a comb9ation ( ^! two me?ods4 ,ea* p>ty took ! record$ facts & int]pret$ !m 9 accordance ) _! notion ( :at a m$iator %\ld be4 ,bo? p>ties /udi$ ! same facts2 b ! a priori ( _! ?\ght diff]$1 & s _! conclusions diff]$4 ,9 ! realm ( ,*ri/ology ?is a priori ( ?\ght is ( p>am\nt importance4 ,preconceiv$ op9ions inevitably col\r our m5tal picture ( ,*ri/4 ,read]s ( ! ,gospel n>rative f9d !re ! ,*ri/ !y are prep>$ to f9d4 ,on ?is well-recognis$ fact we base our cont5tion t an exam9ation ( any ,*ri/ological sy/em mu/ beg9 ) ! philosophy on :i* ! sy/em re/s4 ,t philosophy supplies ! a priori1 or ! presupposition1 or ! metaphysical basis1 :i*ev] "n we pref]4 ,we d n sugge/ t !ologians h consci\sly adopt$ a metaphysical pr9ciple z ! basis ( _! beliefs1 & !n h appli$ x to ! special problem ( ,*ri/ology4 ,t is a possible me?od b n ! usual "o4 ,9 mo/ cases ! philosophic basis rema9s 9 ! backgr\nd ( consci\sness2 its exi/5ce is unrecognis$ & its influ5ce undetect$4 ,if ,*ri/ian ?9k]s took ! tr\ble to analyse ! basis ( _! beliefs ab\t ,*ri/1 !y w\ld n halt1 z !y s (t5 d1 at ! /age ( monophysitism4 ,if !y laid b>e to ! f\ndations ! /ructure ( _! fai?1 ! dang] ( error w\ld be r$uc$ to a m9imum4 ,view$ f ! /&po9t ( timeless reason1 monophysitism is bas$ on a def9ite metaphysical idea4 ,n all monophysites h consci\sly adopt$ t basis2 _m1 _h !y recognis$ its pres5ce1 w\ld h reject$ x4 ,b x 0 pres5t z a t5d5cy4 ,a t5d5cy may be neutralis$ by c\nt]act+ causes2 b x has its effect1 & soon] or lat] x w produce positive results4 ,,! ,,?ree ,,typical ,,*ri/ologies ,! same tru? holds ( ! o!r ,*ri/ological sy/ems4 ,a diff]5t metaphysical idea lies at ! root ( ea*4 ,ne/orian1 monophysite1 ca?olic1 ^! ?ree 7 ! ma9 types ( ,*ri/ologian 9 ! fif? c5tury4 ,ea* /udi$ ,*ri/'s life4 ,aft] /udy+ x1 ! ,ne/orian said ( ,him1 ,!re are two p]sons "h4 ,n s1 said ! monophysite1 ,i see b "o inc>nate nature ( ,god ! ,^w4 ,! ca?olic repli$1 ,y are bo? wrong2 !re is "o p]son 9 two natures4 ,all ?ree types des]ve close /udy4 ,! ?9k]s 7 dev\t & s9c]e1 &1 = ! mo/ "p1 able m54 ,!re is no "q "h ( sup]ficial un9=m$ ?\ght1 nor ( moral obliquity4 ,! disagreem5t 0 due n to _! vision b to _! view po9t1 n to ! object ( _! ?\ght or ! process ( _! ?9k+1 b to _! diff]5t presuppositions & />t+ po9ts4 ,pres5t$ 9 ?is way ! monophysite & o!r ,*ri/ological controv]sies ( ! fif? & six? c5turies become phases ( ! cosmic problem4 ,!y ?us rega9 ! dignity :i* is !irs by "r1 & :i* !y lose 9 ! ord9>y *ur* hi/ories4 ,! heat ( passion !y ar\s$ becomes intelligible4 ,x 0 no battle ab\t words4 ,! /akes 7 high4 ,! controv]siali/s *ampion$ f>-rea*+ pr9ciples ) a decisive influ5ce on ! c\rse ( ?\ght & conduct4 ,unfri5dly critics usually portray ! ,*ri/ologians z n>r[-m9d$ & audaci\s4 ,s1 no d\bt1 !y 71 b !y 7 n wrong-head$4 ,if ! matt]s 9 dispute betwe5 !i/1 dei/1 & pan!i/ are trivialities1 !n & !n only c we reg>d ! ent]prise ( ! ,*ri/ologians z *im]ical & _! a*ievem5ts z futile4 ,! diff]5t =mulae repres5t$ attitudes ( m9d fundam5tally oppos$4 ,no peace betwe5 ca?olic & monophysite 0 possible4 ,!y _h conflict+ conceptions ( ultimate tru?4 ,,dep5d5ce ,,( ,,*ri/ology ,,on ,,philosophy ,we m5tion$ above ! two o!r *ief ,*ri/ological sy/ems1 ! ,ne/orian & ! ca?olic4 ,no analysis ( monophysitism :i* omitt$ a ref]5ce to ^! sy/ems w\ld be complete4 ,!y 7 ?ree ne>ly contempor>y attempts to solve ! same problem4 ,! comp>ison is ( special int]e/ :51 z "h1 fundam5tal pr9ciples are "u exam9ation4 ,x demon/rates ! clos5ess ( ! connection betwe5 ! ,*ri/ological & ! cosmic problems4 ,9 ea* ( ! ?ree cases we f9d t a s*ool ( philosophy corresponds to ! s*ool ( !ology1 & t ! philosoph]'s dom9ant idea ab\t ! cosmos decid$ ! !ologian's int]pretation ( ,*ri/4 ,?is connection betwe5 philosophy & ,*ri/ology is ( e>ly date4 ,f ! nature ( bo? discipl9es x _h to be4 ,ev5 9 apo/olic days ! mean+ ( ! inc>nation 0 realis$4 ,*ri/ 0 appreh5d$ z a be+ ( m ?an national or t]re/rial importance4 ,! ,paul9e & ,johann9e ,*ri/ologies gave cosmic significance to ,8 "w1 & s inevitably to ,8 ,p]son4 ,!ologians made ! trem5d\s surmise t ,jesus ( ,naz>e? 0 no o!r ?an ! ,logos ( ! ,neo-,py?agoreans or ! ,wise ,"o ( ! ,/oics4 ,t is to say1 ,he /&s n only betwe5 ,god & man1 b betwe5 ,creator & creation4 ,he is ! embodim5t ( ! cosmic relation4 ,f e>ly days1 !n1 philosophy & religion 7 work+ at ! same problem2 _! pa?s met at ! "o goal ( ! ,ideal ,p]son :o satisfi$ bo? head & he>t4 ,! sy/ematic ,*ri/ology ( ! fif? c5tury 01 !re=e1 a completion ( ! "w begun 9 ! fir/4 ,,! ,,*ri/ological ,,& ,,! ,,cosmic ,,problems ,! ess5ce ( ! ,*ri/ological problem is ! "q z to ! union ( natures 9 ,*ri/4 ,are !re two natures div9e & human 9 ,him8 ,is ea* di/9ct f ! o!r & f ! p]son8 ,is ! di/9ction conceptual or actual8 ,! inc>nation is a union4 ,is x a real union8 ,if s1 :at did x unite8 ,we h se5 t su* que/ions _c be approa*$ )\t presuppositions4 ,:at ^! presuppositions %all be is decid$ 9 ! sph]e ( a wid] problem4 ,?is wid] problem is kn[n z ! cosmic problem4 ,! solution giv5 to x prescribes ! presuppositions ( any attempt to solve ! specialis$ problem4 ,we %all proce$ to sket* ! cosmic problem1 & to indicate ! ?ree ma9 types ( answ]s giv5 to x4 ,x w !n be evid5t t ^! ?ree answ]s f9d _! respective c\nt]p>ts 9 ! ,ne/orian1 monophysite & ! ca?olic solutions ( ! ,*ri/ological problem4 ,z man's intellectual p[]s mature1 two supreme g5]alisations =ce !mselves on 8 consci\sness4 ,he conceives 8 exp]i5ce z a :ole & calls x ! _w2 he conceives ! basis ( 8 exp]i5ce z a :ole & calls x ,god4 ,to "s m9ds ! _w1 to "s m9ds ,god1 is ! great] reality2 b bo? concepts are pres5t 9 v>y+ proportions :]ev] ?\ght becomes self-consci\s4 ,"h we h 9 its l[e/ t]ms ! mat]ial = ! ontological "q1 ! fir/ & ! la/ problem ( philosophy4 ,god & ! _w1 at fir/ dimly conceiv$ & sc>cely diff]5tiat$1 gradually sep>ate & take %ape 9 ! m9d z di/9ct entities4 ,! concepts become pr9ciples1 fix$ by language & m5tal imag]y4 ,! gulf betwe5 !m wid5s until !y /& at opposite poles ( ?\ght4 ,9 _! isolation !y con/itute a /&+ *all5ge to ! m9d ( man4 ,if he ?9ks ! _w 9 t]ms ( "t1 he mu/ po/ulate a creator4 ,if he ?9ks ! _w out ( "t1 he is =c$ to conceive a gr\nd ( ! _w's be+4 ,! _w _c be ?\ght )\t ,god nor ,god )\t ! _w4 ,! "o necessitates ! o!r4 ,yet :5 ! ?9k] tries to def9e ! t]ms1 he c at fir/ only d s by negatives4 ,! _w is :at ,god is n1 & ,god is :at ! _w is n4 ,! two prim>y concepts ?us attract & repel ea* o!r4 ,! m9d's fir/ task is to grasp !m 9 _! diff]5ce4 ,x _c re/ !re1 b mu/ proce$ to attempt to reunite !m & grasp !m 9 _! unity4 ,?us ! ma9 problem ( philosophy is to conceive & f9d expression = ! relation betwe5 ,god & ! _w4 ,*ri/ology attacks ess5tially ! same problem4 ,*ri/ology is an attempt to def9e ! relation betwe5 ,god & ! _w 9 t]ms ( p]sonality4 ,?is relation has be5 conceiv$ 9 ?ree modes4 ,accord+ to ! level ( ?\ght rea*$1 or1 z l$ by _! disposition & education1 m5 h made _! *oice betwe5 ?ree m$iat+ concepts4 ,h5ce d]ive ?ree div]g5t types ( ?\ght & ?ree outlooks on life fundam5tally oppos$4 ,we %all take !m 9 _! logical sequ5ce = conv5i5ce ( treatm5t4 ,! hi/orical connection is ( no importance = our pres5t purpose1 b x is notewor?y t ! "t ord] bo? ( ! s*ools ( philosophy & ( ! correspond+ ,*ri/ological sy/ems foll[s approximately ! logical ord]4 ,,! ,,fir/ ,,solution ,,( ,,! ,,cosmic ,,problem--,,dualism ,! fir/ attempt$ solution ( ! cosmic problem is be/ express$ 9 ! concept co-exi/5ce4 ,god & ! _w co-exi/4 ,god is1 & ! _w is2 _! relation is express$ by an &4 ,god & ! _w is ! tru?1 all t man c & ne$ "k4 ,?is solution is v]bal4 ,x leaves ! problem m or less z x f9ds x4 ,! two pr9ciples rema9 ultimates2 nei!r is r$uc$ to ! o!r4 ,god /ill /&s outside ! _w & ! _w outside ,god4 ,nei!r c expla9 ! o!r4 ,?is dualism is ! l[e/ /age ( ontological ?\ght4 ,! ?9k] sees ! problem1 only to turn away f x4 ,he surmises t !re is "s relation betwe5 ! two2 b he _c def9e x1 & x rema9s ineffectual4 ,?is 0 ,plato's e>ly /&po9t4 ,he e/abli%$ ! idea z ! tru? ( ! ?+1 b he fail$ to f9d expression = ! relation betwe5 idea & ideate4 ,he took refuge 9 symbolical language1 & spoke ( ! ?+ z a copy ( ! idea or z a p>ticipant 9 x4 ,b z !re 0 no causation on ! "o side or dep5d5ce on ! o!r side1 all t ! e>li] ,platonic philosophy a*iev$ 0 9 its ideal _w to duplicate ! real4 ,plato's heav5 simply co-exi/s ) ! _w1 & ! relation betwe5 !m is m]ely v]bal4 ,?is metaphysical idea surviv$ ,plato & ,plato's sy/em1 & pass$ into common curr5cy4 ,x f\nd & /ill f9ds expression 9 num]\s speculative & practical sy/ems4 ,9 religi\s ontology we f9d x 9 deism4 ,accord+ to ! dei/ !re 0 once at a def9ite po9t ( "t a relation betwe5 ,god & ! _w1 ! relation ( creation4 ,b1 creation f9i%$1 ! relation ceas$4 ,9 o!r words1 ,god creat$ ! _w1 & !n )drew into ,himself1 leav+ ! _w to "w out its own salvation4 ,! dei/ believes 9 ,god2 b 8 is a self-conta9$ ,god1 :o does n int]f]e 9 ! c\rse ( ?+s or cont9ue creat+4 ,su* a conception ( ,god is useless = religi\s purposes1 because x repres5ts ,him z out ( all relation ) ! _w4 ,,*ri/ological ,,dualism--,,ne/orianism ,! ,*ri/ological c\nt]p>t ( dualism & ( deism is ,ne/orianism4 ,! ,ne/orians halt at ! l[e/ /age ( ,*ri/ological ?\ght4 ,!y admit ,*ri/ to be ! meet+-po9t ( ,god & man1 b !y nullify ! admission by introduc+ dualism into ! p]son ( ,*ri/4 ,!y set out to f9d ! solution ( ! cosmic problem 9 ,*ri/2 !y endeav\r to express ! relation betwe5 ,god & ! _w 9 t]ms ( ,8 p]sonality4 ,!y br+ ! two concepts toge!r1 b !y d n weld !m4 ,fai? & c\rage fail !m at ! critical mom5t4 ,!y sub/itute an association = a union4 ,!y leave ,god & man co-exi/+ 9 ,*ri/1 b n unit$ !re4 ,ne/orianism is a halfway h\se on ! road f ,arianism to ,*ri/ianity4 ,x is a weak compromise4 ,! deity 9 ,*ri/ is admitt$1 b its unity ) humanity d5i$4 ,! div9e rema9s ext]nal to ! human nature4 ,accord+ to ! doctr9e ascrib$ to ,ne/orius two p]sons1 ! son ( ,god & ! son ( ,m>y1 at ! ,baptism 7 my/]i\sly associat$4 ,! union consi/s p>tly 9 id5tity ( "n1 p>tly 9 ! gradual deep5+ ( ! association4 ,z ,jesus grew 9 spiritual p[] & k & ob$i5ce to ! div9e w1 ! union :i* at fir/ 0 relative gradually deep5$ t[>ds an absolute union4 ,div9ity 0 n ,8 bir?right1 b acquir$4 ,?us ?r\gh\t ,8 life ! two p]sonalities rema9$ ext]nal to "o ano!r4 ,! div9e work$ miracles2 ! human suff]$4 ,! ,ne/orian c\ld pride himself on hav+ pres]v$ ! reality ( ! div9e & ! reality ( ! human2 he c\ld wor%ip ! "o & imitate ! o!r4 ,b 8 sy/em 0 non-,*ri/ian1 because x excludes ! elem5t ( m$iation4 ,a dual p]sonality c\ld nev] make atonem5t or r$eem humanity4 ,god & man 9 ,*ri/ 7 br\ght into nom9al contact1 b !re 0 provid$ no *annel by :i* ! div9e virtue might pass into ! human4 ,! ,ne/orian rema9s cont5t ) 8 solution1 because ! backgr\nd ( 8 ?\ght is duali/4 ,! ?9k]'s attitude to ! cosmic problem decides 8 attitude to ! ,*ri/ological problem4 ,cont5t to c\ple ,god & ! _w by an &1 he simil>ly c\ples by an & ! ,logos & ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,divid+ ,god f ! _w1 he divides ,*ri/4 ,ab&on+ metaphysical relation betwe5 ! cosmic pr9ciples1 he despairs ( f9d+1 or1 r1 has no motive = seek+ a p]sonal relation betwe5 ,god & man 9 ! be+ ( ,*ri/4 ,,second ,,solution ,,( ,,! ,,cosmic ,,problem--,,monism ,! second solution giv5 to ! cosmic problem is ( special importance = our !sis4 ,x _h a direct influ5ce on monophysitism1 & may be reg>d$ z supply+ ! metaphysical basis = t h]esy4 ,x repres5ts an advance to a high] /age ( ?\ght1 j z monophysitism1 :i* dep5ds on x1 is an advance on ,ne/orianism1 & has always be5 reg>d$ z a m v5ial h]esy4 ,! m9d f9d+ no satisfaction 9 dualism advances to monism4 ,! spectacle ( two unrelat$ ultimate pr9ciples impels x to seek &1 if necess>y1 to inv5t "s mode ( reconcil+ !m4 ,expla9 x z we may1 ! crav+ = unity1 = syn!sis1 = m$iation is radical 9 human ?\ght4 ,! m9d _c re/ at any?+ %ort ( x4 ,god & ! _w1 held asund] conceptually or only nom9ally unit$1 con/itute a contradiction 9 excelsis1 &1 z su*1 provide an irresi/ible motive = fur!r & deep] ?\ght4 ,z is natural1 ! sw+ ( ! p5dulum c>ries ! m9d to ! opposite extreme4 ,co-exi/5ce fail+ to supply ! requir$ solution1 ! key is s\ght 9 id5tity4 ,god & ! _w are ?\ght z id5tical4 ,! t]ms are connect$ by ! copula4 ,god is ! _w1 & ! _w is ,god4 ,?is is ! tru? ( be+1 = ! moni/4 ,! two pr9ciples are m]g$ 9 "o1 & ! contradiction solv$ by an ass]tion ( ! id5tity ( ! contradictories4 ,monism takes two =ms4 ,x may be ei!r mat]iali/ or spiritual4 ,"o t]m mu/ be select$ z ! reality1 & ! o!r writt5 (f z an illusion4 ,if ! ?9k]'s b5t ( m9d be sci5tific1 he is dispos$ to make ! mat]ial _w ! only objective reality1 & ,god becomes simply a work+ hypo!sis or a creation ( ! subjective m9d4 ,x w\ld be beside our purpose to d m ?an m5tion ?is phase ( monism4 ,spiritual monism1 h[ev]1 requires l5g?i] treatm5t2 x is ( vital importance to our subject4 ,9 ?is case ! m9d takes sides ) ,god z aga9/ ! _w4 ,god is ! reality & ! _w ! illusion4 ,! _w is ,god1 9 spite ( appe>ances to ! contr>y4 ,z _w x has no sub/antive reality2 x has no exi/5ce = self4 ,x is ! %ad[ ( ,god1 an emanation f ,him1 or an aspect ( ,him4 ,l dualism1 monism is only a %am solution ( ! cosmic problem4 ,x fails to keep prom95t ! idea ( relation4 ,a relation mu/ relate4 ,if its t]ms are m]g$1 ! relation falls to ! gr\nd4 ,a relation mu/ be su* t1 :ile ! t]ms are unifi$1 !y are pres]v$ z realities4 ,x mu/ bo? unify & keep di/9ct4 ,to ab&on ei!r ,god or ! _w is a c\nsel ( despair4 ,to detract f ! reality ( ei!r is treason to fact & tantam\nt to a %elv+ ( ! cosmic problem4 ,,philosophical ,,& ,,!ological ,,monism ,! sy/ems t id5tify ,god & ! _w range f ! crude mat]ialism ( ,democritus to ! l(ty spiritualism ( ,plot9us4 ,/oic cosmology occupies an int]m$iate position4 ,! ,/oic 0 nom9ally a pan!i/1 b he seems to h oscillat$ betwe5 a spiritual & a mat]iali/ explanation ( ! univ]sal be+4 ,! moni/ sy/em t prep>$ ! soil = monophysitism & con/antly fo/]$ its gr[? 0 ,neo-,platonism4 ,9 ! h&s ( ,plot9us all ! ma9 elem5ts ( spiritual monism 7 work$ up into a speculative philosophy ) a pr(\nd be>+ on practical life4 ,! _w & ! human _s1 = ,plot9us1 7 simply manife/ations ( ,god4 ,he taught t1 z light issues f ! sun & proce$s =? on its way1 gr[+ gradually dimm] till x passes into d>kness1 s ! _w ( ?\ght & ?+ has no true be+ ap>t f ,god1 f :om x proce$$ & to :om x returns4 ,spiritual monism f\nd 9 ,alex&ria a cong5ial home4 ,bl5d+ !re ) ori5tal my/icism x produc$ a crop ( gno/ic speculative sy/ems1 9 all ( :i* ,acosmism or a d5ial ( ! _w 0 ! keynote4 ,:e!r ! problem 0 conceiv$ 9 t]ms ( be+ or ( value1 ! result 0 ! same4 ,! _w has no true be+4 ,its appe>ance ( solidity is a %am4 ,x has no value4 ,comp>$ ) ,god1 x is negligible4 ,x is b ! %ad[ ca/ by ! et]nal sun4 ,! monophysite t5ets traceable to monism w be consid]$ 9 detail 9 lat] *apt]s4 ,"h our conc]n is to %[ t monism supplies ! metaphysical pr9ciple on :i* ! h]esy is bas$2 t1 z dualism provides ! a priori ( ,ne/orian ?\ght1 monism provides ! a priori ( monophysite ?\ght4 ,,*ri/ological ,,monism--,,monophysitism ,! ess5tial doctr9e ( monophysitism is ! ass]tion ( ! absolute num]ical unity ( ! p]son ( ,*ri/4 ,x c>ries to extremes its d5ial ( ! dual p]sonality ma9ta9$ by ! ,ne/orians4 ,all ve/iges ( duality 7 bani%$ f ,8 be+2 !re 7 n two p]sons3 !re 7 n ev5 two natures4 ,!re 0 9 ,*ri/ only ! "o nature ( ,god ! ,^w4 ,! human nature at ! inc>nation 0 absorb$ into ! div9e4 ,x no m has sub/antive exi/5ce ?an has ! _w 9 a pan!i/ic sy/em4 ,?is is monism 9 t]ms ( p]sonality4 ,its presuppositions are ^? ( a m9d imbu$ ) an all-p[]ful feel+ = unity4 ,x is fac$ ) ! problem ( reconcil+ ,god & ! _w 9 ! p]son ( ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,x br+s to t problem a prejudice aga9/ ! real be+ & ! real value ( ! _w4 ,h5ce x is l$ to draw ! false conclusion t humanity1 :i* is "p ( ! _w1 is n a p]man5t elem5t 9 ! highe/ tru?2 t ev5 p]fect humanity1 humanity repres5tative ( all t is noble/ 9 ! race1 _c be all[$ true exi/5ce 9 ! ,ideal4 ,monism ab&ons ! univ]sal relation by ab&on+ "o or o!r ( ! t]ms to be relat$4 ,monophysitism cuts a simil> knot 9 a simil> fa%ion4 ,x jettisons r$emption by exclud+ f ! ,r$eem] all k9%ip ) t :i* ,he came to r$eem4 ,nom9ally admitt+ human nature into union ) deity1 x de/roys ! reality ( t transaction at a /roke by mak+ ! two natures id5tical4 ,s ! inc>nation1 = ! monophysite1 becomes a my?2 no *ange 9 ! nature ( ! ,logos took place at x1 &1 consequ5tly1 no *ange 9 ! nature ( ! ,man ,*ri/ ,jesus4 ,we may trace ! lik5ess betwe5 ! cosmic & ! ,*ri/ological problems /ill fur!r4 ,monism is =c$ to attempt to give "s acc\nt ( ! _w's app>5t reality4 ,simil>ly monophysitism _h to try to expla9 ^? facts ( ,*ri/'s life :i* on ! face ( ! ,gospel n>rative are human & normal4 ,! explanation (f]$ is ess5tially ! same 9 bo? sy/ems4 ,! moni/ ass]ts t ! _w exi/s only 9 ! m9d ( ! ?9k]4 ,x is an illusion ( ! s5ses4 ,! duty ( ! philosoph] is to ov]come ! illusion by turn+ away f ! _w ( s5se & fix+ 8 m9d on true be+2 by ascesis & contemplation he endeav\rs to atta9 ! ec/atic /ate1 9 :i* ! illusion ( ! _w's reality disappe>s1 & ! pot5tial id5tity ( man ) ! univ]sal _s becomes actualis$ 9 exp]i5ce4 ,simil>ly1 = ! monophysite1 ! humanity ( ,*ri/ 0 a creation ( ! s5ses4 ,*ri/'s body 0 a phantom1 & ,8 human m9d simply an aspect ( ,him4 ,!y 7 impressions left on ! m9ds ( ,8 contempor>ies4 ,hav+ no sub/antive exi/5ce1 no reality 9 fact1 !y 7 to be ignor$ 9 ,*ri/ological dogma4 ,!y 7 n to be consid]$ z "p ( ! true ,*ri/2 !y 7 n to be wor%ipp$4 ,no spiritual value atta*$ to !m4 ,!y 7 h9drances r ?an helps to ! religion t aim$ at entire ab&onm5t ( self & absorption 9 ! div9e4 ,,! ,,?ird ,,solution ,,( ,,! ,,cosmic ,,problem--,,id5tity ,,9 ,,diff]5ce ,we come n[ to ! ?ird & la/ solution ( ! cosmic problem4 ,z we develop x1 we %all endeav\r to %[ t x supplies t metaphysical idea :i* =ms ! basis ( ca?olic ,*ri/ology4 ,! two previ\s solutions fail$4 ,!y d n satisfy ! philosoph] & !y mislead ! !ologian4 ,! "o sep>ates ,god f ! _w2 ! o!r m]ges !m4 ,?us bo?1 9 effect1 ab&on ! orig9al ent]prise4 ,!y de/roy ! relation in/ead ( express+ x4 ,! concepts bo? ( co-exi/5ce & ( id5tity h prov$ fruitless 9 ! speculative problem1 & 9 ,*ri/ology h giv5 rise to h]esy4 ,! ?ird s*ool ( ?\ght takes z its />t+ po9t nei!r ,god1 nor ! _w1 nor ! two z co-exi/+1 b ! relation ( ! two4 ,x makes t relation su* t ! t]ms relat$ are pres]v$ 9 ! relation4 ,nei!r id5tity nor diff]5ce is ! full tru?1 b id5tity 9 & ?r\gh diff]5ce4 ,god is n ! _w1 nor is ! _w ,god4 ,god is1 & ! _w is4 ,ea* are facts4 ,9 _! sep>at5ess !y are n true facts4 ,x is only z we conceive ! two 9 _! on5ess1 a supra-num]ical on5ess1 t we c give _! full value to ea*4 ,! _w is ,god's _w2 !re=e x has be+ & value4 ,! cosmic relation !n is express$ n by an &1 nor by an is1 b by an (4 ,! ,god ( ! _w is ! key concept t unlocks ! doors ( ! palace ( tru?4 ,x 0 9 ! prom95ce giv5 to ?is concept t ,ari/otle's sy/em made a great advance on t ( 8 pr$ecessor4 ,plato _h e/abli%$ a _w ( ideas ) ! idea ( ! ,good z its c5tre1 b he left x unrelat$ to ! _w ( exp]i5ce4 ,ari/otle insi/$ on relat+ ! ideal & ! real4 ,8 concept ( relation 0 t ( =m & matt]4 ,! _w ap>t f ,god is matt] ap>t f =m4 ,x has only pot5tial reality4 ,:5 x becomes unit$ to its =m1 x becomes actual4 ,its =m makes x a fact--:at x has 9 x to be4 ,ari/otle conceives diff]5t grades ( be+4 ,un=m$ matt] is ! l[e/ ( ^! grades1 & ,god ! highe/4 ,ea* grade supplies ! matt] ( :i* ! next highe/ grade is ! =m4 ,asc5d+ ! scale ( be+ at la/ we rea* pure =m4 ,?us ! ladd] ( developm5t is con/ruct$ by :i* ! _w rises to its realisation 9 ,god4 ,ari/otle gave to humanity ! conception ( a ,god :o transc5ds ! _w1 & yet is imman5t 9 x1 z =m is 9 matt]4 ,?us ,greek philosophy 9 ,ari/otle atta9$ t spiritual mono!ism :i* suppli$ ! f\ndation = ! edifice ( ,*ri/ian doctr9e4 ,! effect ( ,ari/otle's tea*+ 0 felt by all ! ecclesia/ical p>ties 9 ! fif? c5tury4 ,z we %all see 9 a lat] *apt]1 "s ( ! subsidi>y elem5ts ( 8 philosophy are reflect$ 9 monophysitism4 ,! dom9ant ideas1 h[ev]1 ( ! sy/em1 ! conception ( ,god & ! _w & ! relation betwe5 !m1 7 tak5 ov] by ! ca?olic !ologians1 & incorporat$ into _! ,*ri/ology4 ,we ne$ n "h inquire :e!r ,ari/otle's influ5ce 0 direct or indirect4 ,no d\bt _m ( ! !ologians :o con/ruct$ ,*ri/ian doctr9e _h read 8 works4 ,:e!r t is s or n1 !y mu/ h unconsci\sly assimilat$ 8 c5tral doctr9e4 ,x 0 common prop]ty4 ,! det]m9ation to keep ,god a reality & ! _w a reality & yet relate ! two became ! controll+ motive ( _! ?9k+4 ,ari/otle 9 !ory & application ( !ory has always a feel+ = fact4 ,! individual ?+ & ! _w ( individual ?+s are1 = him1 nev] negligible4 ,realis$ matt]1 life1 ! human _s1 human nature1 are actualities & h _! value z su*4 ,!y are n all on ! same level ( be+2 !y d n occupy ! same rank2 & x is ! philosoph]'s bus9ess to det]m9e _! respective positions 9 ! scale ( be+ & value4 ,b he _c h 8 head 9 ! cl\ds ( contemplation1 unless he h 8 feet on ! e>? ( fact4 ,,! ,,ess5ce ,,( ,,ca?olic ,,*ri/ology ,ca?olic ,*ri/ology has caught ! _s ( ,ari/otle's tea*+4 ,x is n prim>ily speculative4 ,x is 9 close t\* ) fact4 ,x is ! outcome ( a deep-felt want4 ,r$emption is ! fir/ dem& ( religi\s exp]i5ce2 s x is ! motive & !me ( all ,*ri/ology4 ,! s\l views itself z a memb] ( a _w ( s\ls e/rang$ f ,god1 & = its own peace & welf>e seeks to effect a union betwe5 ,god & ! _w4 ,su* a union1 to be effective1 mu/ pres]ve ! be+ & value ( ! _w4 ,if !re 7 no _w or only a valueless _w1 !re w\ld be no?+ to r$eem1 or no?+ wor? r$eem+4 ,seek+ t union 9 p]sonality1 & 9 ! mo/ m>vell\s p]sonality ( hi/ory1 ! or?odox !ologians by a true in/9ct ascrib$ to ,him bo? div9e & human natures4 ,he is ! cosmic unity ( opposites4 ,8 p]son is ! cosmic relation4 ,9 t p]son ! l[] t]m ( ! relation has true be+ & full value4 ,?us ! ,*ur* /e]$ a middle c\rse betwe5 ! ,scylla ( co-exi/5ce & ! ,*>ybdis ( id5tity4 ,^! a priori d$uctions z to ! be+ ( ,*ri/ 7 v]ifi$ by a ref]5ce to fact4 ,! life-/ory ( ! hi/oric ,*ri/ comprises two di/9ct gr\ps ( exp]i5ce4 ,!re are ?\ghts1 de$s1 & words attribut$ to ,him t only ,god c\ld h ?\ght1 done1 & said4 ,!re are z well ?\ghts1 de$s & words ( ,8 t only a man c\ld h ?\ght1 done & said4 ,h5ce ! diphysite doctr9e 0 v]ifi$ a po/]iori4 ,aga91 9 bo? gr\ps ( exp]i5ce !re is a nev]-fail+ connect+ l9k4 ,!re is a unity ly+ deep] 9 ,8 consci\sness ?an ! duality4 ,*ri/1 ! ,ag5t1 is ! same 9 bo? p>ts4 ,:e!r z ,god or man1 ,he is nev] out ( "*4 ,h5ce ! unity ( ! p]son also 0 e/abli%$ a po/]iori4 ,?us1 to ! or?odox ,*ri/ologians1 ! expectation t ! human ,ideal w\ld be a unity1 compris+ div9ity & humanity1 0 ju/ifi$ by hi/orical fact4 ,!y f\nd a fur!r v]ification on apply+ ! te/ ( practice4 ,or?odox ,*ri/ology satisfies ! requirem5ts ( ! s\l4 ,man's *ief spiritual ne$ is access to ,god ?r\gh a daysman t might lay 8 h& ^u bo?4 ,an exempl>1 ev5 ?\gh p]fect1 is n adequate to 8 ne$4 ,! unio my/ica c only be exp]i5c$ by ! leisur$ few4 ,man dem&s a religion ( r$emption1 a r$emption t all[s value to lab\r1 to endeav\r1 to human ?\ght1 t recognises ! reality ( pa9 & sorr[ & s91 a r$emption t r$eems humanity 9 all its phases & 9 ! weal? ( its exp]i5ces4 ,an ,ag5t t has n %>$ to ! full ^? exp]i5ces is useless = ! purpose4 ,r$emption mu/ be ! "w ( ,"o :o kn[s ,god & kn[s man1 ( ,"o :o has ! t\* ( sympa?y2 = to su* a t\* alone c humanity respond4 ,! ,*ri/ology t makes ,*ri/ ,jesus consub/antial ) ,god & ) man satisfies man's deep-felt ne$4 ,,summ>y ,,( ,,! ,,*apt] ,we h tak5 a triad ( ontologies & a triad ( ,*ri/ological sy/ems1 plac$ !m side by side1 & exam9$ !m4 ,! result ( t exam9ation is a triple correspond5ce4 ,! metaphysical pr9ciple is f\nd 9 ea* case work$ out 9 a correspond+ ,*ri/ology4 ,! comp>ison is ( g5]al int]e/4 ,x reveals ,*ri/ology z intimately connect$ ) ! work+s ( intellect1 z 9 ! ma9 /ream ( ! curr5t ( human ?\ght1 z capable ( philosophic treatm5t4 ,fur!r ?an t1 ! comp>ison is vital to ! ma9 argum5t ( ?is essay4 ,x provides ! clue to ! he>t ( our subject4 ,! sci5ti/1 :o wi%es to und]/& a botanical specim51 pays z mu* att5tion to :at is 9 ! gr\nd z to :at is above gr\nd4 ,! se$ & roots are z full ( sci5tific int]e/ z are /em1 leaf & fl[]4 ,simil>ly1 to und]/& ! monophysite h]esy1 to be able to detect x & expose x1 we mu/ take x 9 ! g]m4 ,we may pu% ! illu/ration fur!r4 ,! prop]ties ( a botanical specim5 are be/ /udi$ 9 connection ) organisms ( alli$ species4 ,we _c isolate unless we comp>e4 ,by comp>ison ! ess5tial features1 functions & prop]ties ( ! specim5 "u exam9ation are elucidat$4 ,x is by isolat+ ! ?ree g]m9al ideas ( ^! ?ree ,*ri/ological sy/ems & comp>+ !m1 t a full compreh5sion ( monophysitism 9 all its /ages1 f se$ to fl[]1 is rea*$4 ,we h us$ ?is me?od1 & h f\nd t ! roots ( ! h]esy lie 9 spiritual monism4 ,9 subsequ5t *apt]s we %all analyse its orig9s z a hi/orical sy/em1 its specific t5ets & its practical consequ5ces4 ,x w !n be se5 t ! _s ( monism p]vades ! :ole sy/em4 ,,*apt] ,,ii ,,! ,,orig9s ,,( ,,monophysitism ,! monophysitism ( ! fif? c5tury _h its roots 9 ! pa/ z well z 9 ! a priori4 ,9 ! previ\s *apt] we treat$ x z a phase ( philosophic ?\ght & review$ ! metaphysic on :i* ! h]esy re/s4 ,9 ! pres5t *apt] its relations z a hi/orical sy/em ( religi\s ?\ght are to be exhibit$4 ,z su*1 x owes mu* to outside influ5ces4 ,mu* 9 ! monophysite mode ( ?\ght & _m ( its specific doctr9es c be trac$ ei!r to o!r ecclesia/ical h]esies or to pagan philosophies4 ,! fact ( ?is d\ble d]ivation des]ves to be emphasis$4 ,x refutes ! *>ge ( inquisitorial bigotry1 s frequ5tly levell$ aga9/ ! !ologians ( ! e>ly c5turies4 ,! non-,*ri/ian aff9ities ( ! h]esy acc\nt = ! bitt]ness ( ! controv]sy to :i* x gave rise1 &1 9 l>ge measure1 excuse ! intol]ance %[n by bo? p>ties4 ,h]esies 7 n dome/ic qu>rels4 ,contempor>ies view$ !m z involv+ a life & dea? /ruggle betwe5 believ]s & unbeliev]s4 ,*ri/ianity c af=d to be tol]ant to-day4 ,x has an assur$ position4 ,its t5ets are def9$4 ,*ri/ians c almo/ always di/+ui% at a glance errors t ?reat5 ! ess5tials ( ! ,fai? f ^? t d n4 ,9 ! f\r? & fif? c5turies ! case 0 o!rwise4 ,*ri/ianity 0 !n "o among _m conflict+ sy/ems ( religion4 ,its intellectual bases 7 z yet only imp]fectly ?\ght out4 ,any doctr9al error seem$ capable ( poison+ ! :ole body ( belief4 ,h]esy1 s ! or?odox held1 0 ( ! devil4 ,no *>itable view ( x 0 all[able4 ,t uncompromis+ attitude 01 to a l>ge ext5t1 ju/ifi$ because _m articles ( ! h]etical cre$s 7 ( purely pagan orig94 ,giv5 simil> conditions to-day1 our easy tol]ance ( op9ion w\ld disappe>4 ,if ,islam1 = in/ance1 7 to-day a s]i\s m5ace to ! ,fai?1 ,*ri/ians w\ld automatically /iff5 _! attitude t[>ds monophysite doctr9es4 ,tol]ation ( ! false ,*ri/ology w\ld1 "u ^? circum/ances1 be treason to ! true4 ,! ,*ur* ( ! fif? c5tury 0 m5ac$ f _m sides4 ,monophysitism 0 ! foe at h] gates4 ,t h]esy 0 n a v>iety ( ,*ri/ianity4 ,x 0 a semi-pagan !osophy1 a product ( ,greek & ori5tal1 z well z ( purely ,*ri/ian speculation2 !re=e x 0 ana!ma to ! or?odox4 ,,! ,,elem5tal ,,=ms ,,( ,,*ri/ological ,,error--,,docetism ,,& ,,ebionitism ,we propose to beg9 ! /udy ( ! antec$5ts ( monophysitism by exam9+ ^? ( a ,*ri/ian or semi-,*ri/ian "*4 ,= t purpose x w be necess>y to give a brief sket* ( ! e>ly h]esies 9 s f> z !y be> on ! ,*ri/ological problem4 ,! two primitive =ms ( doctr9al error1 to :i* ! ,*ur*1 ev5 9 apo/olic days1 0 expos$1 7 docetism & ebionitism4 ,^! are ! elem5tal h]esies4 ,all ! lat] ,*ri/ological h]esies are ref9em5ts ( "o or o!r ( ^! two4 ,!y con/itute ! extremes ( ,*ri/ological ?\ght3 betwe5 !m runs ! via m$ia ( or?odoxy4 ,ea* ( ! two sees b "o aspect ( ! two-fold life ( ,*ri/4 ,docetism lays an exclusive emphasis on ,8 real div9ity1 ebionitism on ,8 real humanity4 ,ea* mi/akes a half tru? = a :ole tru?4 ,! doceti/s d5i$ t ,jesus ,*ri/ _h come 9 ! fle%4 ,8 body1 !y taught1 0 an app>ition4 ,he ate & drank1 b ! physical frame receiv$ no su/5ance4 ,he appe>$ to suff]1 b felt no pa94 ,! reality beh9d ! semblance 0 ! div9e _s-be+1 :o conjur$ up ! illusion 9 ord] to elevate ! ?\ghts ( mank9d4 ,?is docetic !ory comm5d$ itself to _m ( ! ,greek ,*ri/ians4 ,!y 7 famili> ) ! notion ( ! gods com+ d[n to !m 9 ! lik5ess ( m54 ,greek my?ology ab\nds 9 in/ances ( docetic inc>nations4 ,! gods ( ! popul> religion con/antly assum$ visible =m dur+ _! tempor>y manife/ations4 ,! ebionites ?reat5$ ! ,fai? f ! opposite qu>t]4 ,!y taught t ,*ri/ 0 real man & only man4 ,accord+ to !m1 ! :ole value ( ,8 life & "w lay 9 ,8 moral tea*+ & ,8 noble example2 !re is no my/]y1 no contact ( div9e & human 9 ,*ri/2 :at ,he atta9$1 we all may atta94 ,! ebionites 7 recruit$ f ! ,jewi% elem5t 9 ! ,*ur*4 ,! rigid mono!ism ( ! ,jews made x h>d = !m to conceive an int]m$i>y betwe5 ,god & man2 !y 7 naturally dispos$ to embrace a humani/ic explanation ( ,*ri/4 ,docetism 0 elaborat$ by ,val5t9us1 ,manes & o!r gno/ics & adopt$ into _! sy/ems1 :ile ebionitism provid$ ! basis = ! ,*ri/ologies ( ,paul ( ,samosata1 ( ! ,phot9ians & ,adoptioni/s4 ,9 contact ) ^! h]esies or?odox beliefs1 orig9ally fluid1 gradually h>d5$4 ,! dogma ,*ri/us deus et homo _h f ! beg9n+ be5 held 9 ! ,*ur*4 ,its full implications 7 n realis$ & =mulat$ until ! conflict ) error came4 ,! controv]sies ( ! ?ird & f\r? c5turies ?rew into bold relief ! unity ( ! p]son & ! p]fection ( ! div9ity & ( ! humanity4 ,,! ,,problem ,,( ,,! ,,hypo/atic ,,union ,! mann] ( ! hypo/atic union !n became an urg5t problem4 ,! ,*ur* ( ! fif? c5tury 0 call$ ^u to attempt a solution4 ,any read+ ( ! ,gospels compell$ ! recognition ( div9e & human elem5ts 9 ,*ri/2 b speculative !ology f\nd x difficult to reconcile t fact ) ! equally important fact ( ! unity ( p]son4 ,! !ologians ( ! previ\s c5tury _h bequea!d little or no guidance4 ,! fif?-c5tury ,*ri/ologians 7 pione]s 9 an unmapp$ region4 ,a?anasius' great treatises on ! inc>nation are h>dly m ?an eloqu5t def5ces ( ! true deity & true humanity ( ,*ri/4 ,!y conta9 little or no con/ructive ,*ri/ology4 ,_! !me is1 auts enn?rps51 hna hmeis !poi?m54 ,he ma9ta9s ! fact1 b does n deal ) ! h[4 ,he uses ! phrase natural union 7hnsis physik71 b does n attempt to def9e ! mode ( t union4 ,,apoll9>ianism ,apoll9>is 01 z f> z we "k1 ! fir/ !ologian to approa* ?is subject4 ,we may note 9 pass+ t1 ?\gh he 0 bi%op ( ,laodicea 9 ,syria1 ,alex&ria 0 8 native place4 ,8 fa!r 0 an ,alex&rian1 & he himself _h be5 a fri5d ( ,a?anasius4 ,! fact ( 8 connection ) ,alex&ria des]ves m5tion1 because 8 doctr9e reflects ! ideas ( ! ,alex&rian s*ool ( ?\ght1 n ^? ( ! ,syrian4 ,apoll9>is set himself to attack ! h]etical view t !re 7 two ,sons--"o be=e all "t1 ! div9e ,logos1 & "o aft] ! inc>nation1 ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,9 do+ s he felt con/ra9$ to =mulate a !ory ( ! union ( natures4 ,he />t$ f ! ,platonic division ( human nature into ?ree p>ts1 rational s\l1 animal s\l1 & body4 ,he argu$ t 9 ! /atem5t ! ,logos became fle%1 fle% mu/ mean animal s\l & body4 ,he urg$ 9 pro( t x w\ld be absurd to suppose ! ,logos condition$ by human reason2 t rational s\l 0 ! seat ( p]sonality1 & t if x 7 associat$ ) ! ,logos1 x w\ld be impossible to avoid recognis+ two ,sons4 ,he expressly ass]t$ t ! humanity ( ,*ri/ 0 incomplete1 cont5d+ t ?is v defect 9 ! human nature made possible ! unity ( ,8 p]son4 ,accord+ to ,apoll9>is1 !n1 ! union 0 a composition4 ,! ,logos sup]s$$ ! human reason1 & 0 ?us unit$ to body & animal s\l4 ,apoll9>ianism 0 a =m ( docetism4 ,9 ascrib+ imp]fection to ! human nature ( ,*ri/ x eo ipso d5i$ its reality4 ,apoll9>is1 9 fact1 said ( ,*ri/'s reason :at ! e>ly doceti/s said ( ,8 body4 ,! sy/em is m +5i\s ?an conv9c+4 ,x is highly artificial4 ,x provides no intellectual basis = a liv+ fai? 9 an inc>nate ,*ri/4 ,! !ory1 h[ev]1 0 v influ5tial 9 its day1 & 0 intimately connect$ ) ! rise ( monophysitism4 ,euty*es1 ! fa!r ( ! monophysites1 0 condemn$ by a local synod at ,con/ant9ople 9 ,a4,d4 #ddh on ! gr\nd t he 0 affect$ by ! h]esy ( ,val5t9us & ,apoll9>is4#a ,h>nack goes s f> z to say t ! :ole position ( ! lat] monophysites1 ?\ght out to all its conceivable conclusions1 is already to be f\nd 9 ,apoll9>is4 ,apoll9>ianism 0 condemn$ at ! second g5]al c\ncil1 & !re ! ,*ur* made h] fir/ decl>ation1 a negative "o1 on ! subject ( ! hypo/atic union4 ,9 conflict ) ! h]esies :i* arose 9 ! next two g5]ations1 %e evolv$ a positive /atem5t ( ! tru?4 ,,! ,,ne/orian ,,reaction ,opposition to ,apoll9>ianism gave rise to ! ,ne/orian h]esy4 ,! orig9al ebionitism _h di$ away1 b its _s & c5tral doctr9e reappe>$ 9 ,ne/orianism4 ,ne/orianism might be describ$ z ebionitism con=m+ to ! cre$s ( ,nicaea & ,con/ant9ople4 ,! lead]s ( ! opposition to ! ,apoll9>i/s ( ! fif? c5tury 7 _! own ,syrian c\ntrym5 ^: headqu>t]s 0 at ,antio*4 ,! ,antio*ians diff]$ f ! ,apoll9>ians 9 ! />t+-po9t ( _! ,*ri/ology & 9 ! controll+ motive ( _! ?\ght4 ,:ile ,apoll9>is _h con/ruct$ 8 ,*ri/ology on ! basis ( ! doctr9e ( ! ,tr9ity1 ! ,antio*ians />t$ f ! =mula p]fect alike 9 deity & humanity4 ,! reason+s ( ,apoll9>is 7 gov]n$ by ! ?\ght ( r$emption4 ,! fundam5tal "q ( religion = him 01 ,h[ c ! close/ union betwe5 div9e & human be secur$8 ,! t5d5cy ( ! ,antio*ians1 on ! o!r h&1 0 to neglect ! int]e/s ( ,sot]iology & to emphasize ! e?ical aspect ( ,*ri/'s life & tea*+4 ,!y put 9 ! backgr\nd ! idea ( ! all-creat+1 all-su/a9+ ,logos1 :o took man's nature ^u ,him & 9 ,8 p]son deifi$ humanity4 ,_! ?\ght c5tr$ on ! hi/oric ,*ri/1 ! ,*ri/ ( ! evangeli/s4 ,!y did n rev]t to crude ebionitism1 b !y expla9$ ! ,nic5e cre$ f an ebionitic /&-po9t4 ,!y ma9ta9$ z aga9/ ! ,apoll9>ians ! complet5ess ( ,*ri/'s human nature2 ) equal vig\r !y ma9ta9$ ! ess5tial deity ( ! ,logos4 ,! pov]ty 7ebionitism7 ( _! doctr9es consi/$ 9 _! paltry view ( ! hypo/atic union4 ,! union1 accord+ to ! ,ne/orians1 0 subsequ5t to ! conception ( ,jesus4 ,x 0 n a p]sonal1 b a moral union4 ,x 0 a conjunction ( two co-ord9ate entities4 ,!y taught t ! m ! man ,jesus act$ 9 accordance ) ! div9e prompt+s1 ! clos] became 8 union ) ! ,logos4 ,t is to say1 ! union 0 relative n absolute4 ,?us ! union betwe5 div9e & human 9 ,*ri/ diff]$ only 9 degree f ! union ( ! same elem5ts 9 any good man4 ,! unity ( ! ,son ( ,god & ! ,son ( ,m>y consi/$ solely 9 ! id5tity ( "n1 hon\r & wor%ip4 ,,cyril ,,( ,,alex&ria ,cyril1 ,bi%op ( ,alex&ria1 l$ ! opposition to ,ne/orius4 ,he decl>$ t ! mom5t ( conception 0 ! mom5t ( ! union1 & t ! notion ( inc>nation involv$ mu* m ?an an association ( natures4 ,he ma9ta9$ t ! inc>nation 0 a hypo/atic union 7hnsis physik74 ,he endeav\r$ to gu>d aga9/ an ,apoll9>ian int]pretation ( 8 tea*+2 b 9 ?is attempt he 0 n altoge!r successful4 ,he ass]t$ ! p]fection ( ,*ri/'s humanity & ! di/9ction betwe5 ! two natures4 ,! p]fection1 h[ev]1 is compromis$1 & ! di/9ction r5d]$ purely ideal by 8 fur!r /atem5t t !re 7 two natures be=e1 b only "o aft] ! union4 ,he cit$ 9 pro( ! words ( ,a?anasius1 "o inc>nate nature ( ,god ! ,^w4 ,cyril prevail$4 ,ne/orius 0 condemn$ & ! ,antio*ian s*ool discr$it$4 ,cyril's victory1 h[ev]1 0 ( d\btful value to or?odoxy4 ,8 ard5t b unbalanc$ utt]ances bequea!d to ! ,*ur* a legacy ( /rife4 ,8 writ+s1 p>ticul>ly ! e>li] ones1 furni%$ ! monophysites ) an arm\ry ( weapons4 ,8 tea*+ c\ld n ) ju/ice be /yl$ docetic or ,apoll9>ian1 b its my/ic tone 0 s pron\nc$ t x prov$ a propa$eutic = monophysitism4 ,! %ibbole? ( or?odoxy1 quot$ above1 "o inc>nate nature ( ,god ! ,^w1 pass$ rapidly into ! wat*word ( h]esy4 ,a?anasius _h us$ ! ^w nature 9 a broad s5se4 ,! monophysites n>r[$ x d[n to its lat] te*nical mean+4 ,?us !y exalt$ ,*ri/ into a region beyond ! k5 ( mortal man4 ,! inc>nation became a my/]y pure & simple1 un9telligible1 call+ = bl9d acceptance4 ,! monophysites1 foll[+ ,cyril1 height5$ ! my/]y1 b1 9 do+ s1 !y elim9at$ ! reality & ! human appeal ( ! inc>nate life4 ,!y soon began to argue t1 s9ce ,*ri/ is monophysite1 ! prop]ties ( deity & humanity 9 ,him are int]*angeable2 t !re=e1 :ile yet a ,babe 9 ! mang]1 ,he rul$ ! _w ) ! omnisci5ce & omnipres5ce ( ! ,logos2 t :ile ,he hang$ ^u ! ,cross1 ,8 mighty p[] su/a9$ & ord]$ ! univ]se4 ,! monophysites pr(ess$ great jeal\sy = ! hon\r due to ! ,r$eem]4 ,b ! ascription ( su* attributes to ,jesus ,*ri/ detracts f ,8 hon\r4 ,if ! nature t suff]$ on ! ,cross be n di/9ct f ! nature t _c suff]1 !n ! ,crucifixion 0 a %am4 ,monophysitism is docetism elaborat$4 ,x ab&ons ! ,*ri/ ( hi/ory4 ,x rules out ,8 prokop4 ,x ignores a fact1 vital to ,*ri/ology1 namely ! knsis or div9e self-limitation4 ,?us x ?r[s a veil ( unreality ov] ^? facts on :i* ! ,*ri/ian ,fai? is built4 ,,monophysitism ,a ,,product ,,( ,,positive ,,& ,,negative ,,curr5ts ,,( ,,religi\s ,,?\ght ,! =ego+ sket* ( ! e>ly ,*ri/ological h]esies exhibits monophysitism z a product ( two opposite intellectual curr5ts4 ,a man's convictions are settl$ = him p>tly by acceptance1 p>tly by rejection ( :at tradition (f]s or 8 m9d evolves4 ,! mass m9d works simil>ly4 ,x accepts & rejects1 approves & disall[s4 ,! /abilisation ( a body ( mass op9ions1 su* z a h]esy1 is ?us det]m9$ by opposite =ces4 ,x 0 s ) monophysitism4 ,its ,*ri/ian antec$5ts compris$ positive & negative curr5ts4 ,! positive curr5t 0 docetism1 ! negative ebionitism4 ,docetism1 orig9at+ 9 apo/olic times1 pass$ ?r\gh _m phases1 to provide1 at ! end ( ! f\r? c5tury1 9 its mo/ ref9$ =m1 ,apoll9>ianism1 ! imm$iate positive cause ( monophysitism4 ,ebionitism1 relat$ to docetism z realism to idealism1 possess$ equal vitality & equal adaptability4 ,x %[$ itself 9 v>i\s humani/ic int]pretations ( ,*ri/4 ,( ^! ! mo/ elaborate 0 ,ne/orianism1 :i* ex]t$ ! mo/ insi/5t & imm$iate negative influ5ce on ! e>ly gr[? ( monophysitism4 ,,monophysitism ,,& ,,non-,,*ri/ian ,,?\ght ,we leave "h ! subject ( ! influ5ce ( o!r h]esies on monophysitism1 & proce$ to exhibit its aff9ities ) non-,*ri/ian ?\ght4 ,at ,alex&ria1 ! home ( ! h]esy1 two sy/ems ( philosophy1 ! ,ari/otelian & ! ,neo-,platoni/1 7 /rongly repres5t$4 ,bo? ( ^! philosophies ex]cis$ a pr(\nd influ5ce ^u ! orig9s & ^u ! lat] developm5ts ( monophysite doctr9e4 ,we propose to take1 fir/1 ! ,ari/otelian1 & !n ! ,neo-,platoni/ philosophy1 elucidat+ ^? lead+ ideas 9 ea* on :i* ! monophysite ?9k] w\ld naturally fa/51 z l5d+ intellectual support to 8 religi\s views4 ,,! ,,ari/otelian ,,logic ,ari/otle 0 held 9 high e/imation by ! monophysite lead]s1 p>ticul>ly 9 ! six? & sev5? c5turies4 ,8 works 7 translat$ into ,syriac 9 ! ,jacobite s*ools4 ,! ,we/ owes mu* to ^! translations4 ,= x 0 l>gely by ?is ag5cy t 8 metaphysic rea*$ ! ,arabs1 :o transmitt$ x to ! ,we/ 9 ! ,middle ,ages4 ,! ,ari/otelian logic 0 widely kn[n among ! monophysites4 ,x seems to h =m$ "p ( _! educational curriculum4 ,tak5 ap>t f ! re/ ( ! sy/em1 ! logic produces a type ( m9d t revels 9 subtle argum5tation4 ,x exalts ! =m ( ?\ght at ! exp5se ( ! matt]4 ,x _h ?is effect on ! monophysite !ologians4 ,!y 7 tra9$ dialecticians4 ,!y 7 not$ = _! controv]sial p[]s1 = _! con/ant appeal to def9ition1 = ! me*anical precision ( _! argum5ts4 ,^! m5tal qualities1 excell5t 9 !mselves1 d n conduce to s\nd !ology4 ,=mal logic effects cl>ity ( ?\ght (t5 at ! exp5se ( dep?4 ,x treats ?\ghts z ?+s4 ,proc$ure1 t is prop] 9 ! sph]e ( logic1 is out ( place 9 psy*ology & !ology4 ,concepts su* z p]son & nature mu/ be kept fluid1 if !y are n to mislead4 ,if !y are made into h>d & fa/ ideas1 into %>ply def9$ ab/ractions1 !y w be tak5 to repres5t discrete psy*ic entities1 ext]nal to "o ano!r z numb]s are4 ,! elusive1 ,protean "* ( ! int]-p5etrat+ realities beh9d !m w be lo/ to view4 ,! mo/ signal defect ( monophysite me?od is its unque/ion+ submission to ! ,ari/otelian law ( contradiction4 ,! intellectual tra9+ t makes m5 acute logicians disqualifies !m = deal+ ) ! liv+ subject4 ,! monophysite ,*ri/ologians 7 subtle dialecticians1 b ! psy*ology ( ,*ri/'s be+ lay outside _! compet5ce4 ,,ari/otle',s ,,criticism ,,( ,,dualism--,a ,,weapon ,,9 ,,! ,,h&s ,,( ,,! ,,monophysites ,leav+ ! =mal elem5t 9 ,ari/otle's sy/em1 we come to its mat]ial cont5t4 ,"s ( ! prom95t ideas ( ! ,ari/otelian cosmology & psy*ology reappe> 9 ! h]esy we are /udy+4 ,we %all take fir/ ! rejection ( ! ,platonic dualism4 ,ari/otle's repeat$ criticism ( 8 ma/]'s !ory ( ideas is n m]ely de/ructive4 ,x =m$ ! />t+-po9t = 8 own metaphysic4 ,! ideas1 he says1 simply duplicate ! _w ( exi/5t ?+s4 ,!y d n create ?+s or move !m2 !y d n expla9 g5esis or process2 !y m]ely co-exi/ ) ! ideates4 ,! p>ticipation :i* ,plato's lat] !ory po/ulat$ is inadequate4 ,a m intimate relation is requir$4 ,! !ory ( ideas confronts ,god ) a _w1 & leaves ! relation betwe5 !m un=mulat$ & inexplicable4 ,?is criticism is ( fir/ importance = !ology4 ,fai? z well z reason dem&s a real relation betwe5 idea & ideate4 ,! ,*ri/ian /ud5t 9 ! fif? c5tury1 famili> ) ,ari/otle's criticism ( ,plato1 w\ld inevitably apply x 9 ,*ri/ology4 ,any !ory ( r$emption t ascrib$ duality to ! ,r$eem] w\ld seem to him to be op5 to ! objections t ,ari/otle _h urg$ aga9/ ! !ory ( ideas4 ,! ,ne/orian =mula1 9 effect1 juxtapos$ ! ideal ,*ri/ & ! real ,jesus1 & left ! two unrelat$4 ,?is 0 ,platonism 9 ,*ri/ology4 ,ari/otle's attack on ,plato's sy/em provid$ a radical criticism ( ,ne/orianism4 ,! monophysite !ologians 7 bl9d to ! diff]5ce betwe5 ! ,ne/orian position & t ( ! or?odox4 ,!y saw t ,ari/otle _h plac$ a p[]ful weapon 9 _! h&s1 & !y us$ x indiff]5tly aga9/ bo? oppos+ p>ties4 ,,ari/otle',s ,,psy*ology ,we turn n[ to ,ari/otle's psy*ology4 ,we mu/ give a brief sket* ( x 9 ord] to e/abli% ! fact t ! ,ari/otelian & ! monophysite sci5ce ( ! s\l lab\r "u ! same defect4 ,x is a radical defect1 namely1 ! almo/ complete abs5ce ( ! conception ( p]sonality4 ,! pr9ciple ( ,ari/otle's psy*ology1 l t ( 8 metaphysic1 is ! concept ( =m & matt]4 ,! s\l ( man comes "u ! g5]al ontological law4 ,all exi/5ce is divisible into grades1 ! l[] grade be+ ! matt] ^: =m is con/itut$ by ! next highe/ grade4 ,?us !re is a graduat$ scale ( be+1 />t+ f pure matt] & ris+ to pure =m4 ,! inorganic is matt] = ! vegetable k+dom1 ! vegetable k+dom = ! animal k+dom2 ! nutritive process is mat]ial = ! s5sitive1 & ! s5sitive = ! cognitive4 ,man is an epitome ( ^! processes4 ,! v>i\s p>ts ( 8 nature are arrang$ 9 an asc5d+ scale2 =m is ! only cohesive =ce4 ,! animal s\l is ! =m ( ! body1 born ) x1 gr[+ ) x1 dy+ ) x2 ! two are "o 9 ! close/ union conceivable4 ,besides ! s\l ( ! body1 !re is1 says ,ari/otle1 a s\l ( ! s\l4 ,?is is reason1 ess5tially diff]5t f animal & s5sitive s\l4 ,x is n connect$ ) organic function4 ,x is pure intellectual pr9ciple4 ,x is immat]ial1 immortal1 ! div9e elem5t 9 man4 ,?is reason is n a b>e unity4 ,z x appe>s 9 human exp]i5ce1 x is n full-gr[n4 ,pot5tially x conta9s all ! categories1 b ! pot5tiality mu/ be actualis$4 ,consequ5tly reason subdivides into active & passive intellect4 ,! action ( ! =m] on ! latt]1 & ! response ( ! latt] to ! =m]1 con/itute ! developm5t ( ! m9d1 ! education ( ! tru? t is pot5tially pres5t f ! beg9n+4 ,?is hi]>*y ( immat]ial entities conta9s no?+ correspond+ to our idea ( p]sonality4 ,!re is 9 x no pr9ciple t is bo? individual & immortal4 ,ari/otle all[s immortality only to ! univ]sal reason4 ,! psy*ic elem5ts are condemn$ to p]i% ) ! body4 ,!re is no hope = ! p>ts ( ! s\l :i* are mo/ intimately connect$ ) ! individual's exp]i5ce4 ,monophysite ,*ri/ology %>es ?is fundam5tal defect4 ,! monophysite ?9k] attempt$ to express ! union ( two natures )9 "o exp]i5ce4 ,b 8 psy*ology1 n conta9+ ! notion ( p]sonality1 c\ld furni% no pr9ciple ( syn!sis4 ,an ag5t 9 ! backgr\nd ( life1 to comb9e ! multiplicity ( exp]i5ce1 is a s9e qua non ( a s\nd ,*ri/ology4 ,p]sonality 0 to ! monophysites a t]ra incognita2 & x 0 9 l>ge measure _! devotion to ,ari/otle's sy/em t made !m deaf to ! tea*+ ( ! ca?olic *ur*4 ,,intellectualism ,,& ,,my/icism ,,complem5t>y ,,sy/ems ,aft] ?is sket* ( ! ,ari/otelian features recognisable 9 monophysitism1 we turn to ! o!r great pagan philosophy t assi/$ 9 ! %ap+ ( ! h]esy4 ,intellectualism & my/icism are closely alli$2 ! two are complem5t>y2 !y are z mutually dep5d5t z are head & he>t4 ,x is n !n surpris+ t monophysitism %\ld possess ! *>act]i/ics ( bo? ^! s*ools ( ?\ght4 ,! intellectualism ( ! h]esy 0 l>gely due1 z we h %[n1 to ! ,ari/otelian logic & metaphysic2 its my/ic elem5ts d]ive1 z we proce$ to indicate1 f ,neo-,platonism & k9dr$ !osophies4 ,alex&ria _h be5 = c5turies ! home ( ! my/ics4 ,! geographical position1 z well z ! political circum/ances ( its f\ndation1 de/9$ t city to be ! meet+-place ( ,we/ & ,ea/4 ,!re ! wisdom ( ! ,ori5t met & f\ght & fus$ ) t ( ! ,occid5t4 ,!re ,philo taught1 & bequea!d to ! ,neo-,platoni/s mu* ( 8 ,py?agorean sy/em4 ,!re fl\ri%$ = a :ile & di$ fanta/ic eclectic cre$s1 pagan !osophies masqu]ad+ z ,*ri/ianity4 ,gno/icism 0 a typical product ( ! city4 ,val5t9us & ,basilides & ! o!r gno/ics made 9 t cosmopolitan atmosph]e _! attempts to reconcile ,*ri/ianity ) ,greek & ori5tal ?\ght4 ,!re ,ammonius ,saccas1 aft] 8 lapse f ! ,*ri/ian fai?1 taught & laid ! f\ndation ( ,neo-,platonism4 ,plot9us 0 ! greate/ ( 8 disciples1 &1 ?\gh he taught at ,rome = mo/ ( 8 life1 x 0 9 ! _s ( ,alex&ria t he wr\ght 8 absolute philosophy1 ! full-orb$ spl5d\r ( ! sett+ sun ( ,greek ?\ght4 ,neo-,platonism did n die ) ,plot9us4 ,9 ! middle ( ! fif? c5tury1 :5 monophysitism 0 at its z5i?1 ,proclus 0 fa%ion+ an intellectual ma*9]y to express ! ,plot9ian sy/em4 ,! /ory ( ,hypatia evid5ces ! dom9ant position ( ,neo-,platonism 9 ,alex&rian culture4 ,! viol5ce ( ,cyril's measures aga9/ h] %[s :at a m5ace to ! ,*ur* t philosophy 04 ,cyril 0 n a monophysite1 b mu* t he said & did promot$ _! cause4 ,dioscurus1 8 nephew & successor 9 ! see ( ,alex&ria1 *ampion$ monophysitism at ! c\ncil ( ,*alc$on4 ,9 lat] g5]ations ,alex&ria always (f]$ an asylum to exil$ monophysite lead]s4 ,^! facts r5d] x impossible to reg>d ! connection betwe5 ,alex&ria & monophysitism z =tuit\s4 ,!y fur!r sugge/ t ,neo-,platonism 0 ! connect+ l9k4 ,su* 9 fact x 04 ,monophysitism1 we might almo/ say1 0 ,neo-,platonism 9 ,*ri/ian dress4 ,! e?os ( ! two sy/ems is ! same1 & ! doctr9al resemblance is m>k$4 ,x 0 natural t ! home ( pagan my/icism %\ld cradle ! k9dr$ sy/em ( h]etical ,*ri/ian my/icism4 ,,neo-,,platoni/ ,,ontology ,! repres5tative figure among/ ! ,neo-,platoni/s is ,plot9us4 ,8 compreh5sive m9d ga!r$ up ! ma9 ?reads ( ,alex&rian ?\ght1 & wove !m into ! fabric ( a va/ speculative sy/em4 ,! sy/em is z mu* a religion z a philosophy4 ,x is ! triumph ( uncompromis+ monism4 ,! la/ traces ( dualism h be5 eradicat$4 ,god1 = ,plot9us1 is true be+ & ! only be+4 ,he is all & 9 all4 ,god is an imp]sonal ,tr9ity1 compris+ ! ,"o1 ! cosmic reason & ! cosmic s\l4 ,! ,"o is primal1 ineffable1 beh9d & beyond all human exp]i5ce4 ,all we "k ( ,him is t ,he is ! s\rce & union ( reason & s\l4 ,creation is effect$ by a cont9u\s s]ies ( emanations f ,god4 ,emanation is n an arbitr>y act ( div9e w2 x is a necess>y consequ5ce ( ! nature ( ! ,"o4 ,god mu/ negate ,himself1 & ! process is creation4 ,! fur!r ! process ( negation is c>ri$1 ! less reality does ! creat$ object possess4 ,la/ 9 ! scale comes matt]1 :i* has no self-subsi/5ce1 b is ! absolute self-negation ( ,god4 ,we ref]r$ 9 ! la/ *apt] to ,plot9us' fav\rite illu/ration4 ,we may be all[$1 p]haps1 to repeat x "h4 ,z light1 he says1 issues f ! sun & gr[s gradually dimm]1 until x passes by imp]ceptible degrees into ! d>k1 s reason emanates f ,god &1 pass+ ?r\gh ! phases ( nature1 loses its ess5ce gradually 9 its procession1 until f9ally x is d]ationalis$ & becomes its opposite4 ,,neo-,,platoni/ ,,psy*ology ,human s\ls are at an int]m$iate /age ( ?is cosmic process4 ,l ! ray ( light :i* t\*es bo? sun & e>?1 !y h contact ) ,god & ) matt]4 ,!y /& midway 9 creation4 ,!y are attract$ upw>ds & d[nw>ds4 ,reason draws !m to ,god2 s5se *a9s !m to e>?4 ,_! position decides _! duty4 7,"h ! philosophy becomes a religion74 ,! duty ( man is to break ! s5su\s *a9s & set ! s\l free to return to its home 9 ,god4 ,?is return ( ! s\l to ,god is atta9$ by ! pa? ( k4 ,! k t frees is n speculative2 = su* enhances self-consci\sness4 ,x is imm$iate consci\sness indi/+ui%able f unconsci\sness4 ,x is intuitive k4 ,x is vision 9 :i* ! se] loses himself1 & :at sees is ! same z :at is se54 ,x is ! absorption ( ! s\l 9 ! _w reason1 & s ) ,god4 ,! ,neo-,platoni/ took practical /eps to atta9 ?is my/ic /ate4 ,he submitt$ to rule & discipl9e4 ,by mortification ( ! fle% he endeav\r$ to weak5 s5su\s desire4 ,! arts ( !urgy 7 employ$ to wean ! m9d f s5su\s k1 & to fix aspiration on unse5 realities4 ,contemplation & self-hypnotism 7 widely practis$4 ,9 ec/asy ! my/ic f\nd a =eta/e ( t blissful loss ( be+1 :i* is ! goal & cr[n ( philosophic ?\ght4 ,,monophysitism ,,& ,,neo-,,platonism ,:5 we comp>e monophysitism ) ! sy/em ( ,plot9us1 sev]al po9ts ( resemblance appe>4 ,!re is fir/ ! imp]sonal "* ( ! deity4 ,monophysitism 0 n a ,tr9it>ian h]esy1 & ! ,ca?olic doctr9e ( ! ?ree p]sons 9 ! godhead 0 ! (ficial cre$ ( ! h]etical *ur*4 ,b _! !ologians refra9$ f lay+ emphasis ^u ! di/9ct p]sonalities ( ,fa!r1 ,son & ,holy ,gho/4 ,_! sympa?ies 7 ,sabellian to ! core1 & ,sabellian h]esies 7 con/antly recurr+ )9 _! communion4 ,! imp]sonal ,tr9ity1 su* z ,plot9us taught1 0 ?or\ghly 9 keep+ ) _! ,*ri/ology4 ,!y lack$ a cle> conception ( p]sonality 9 ! second ,p]son ( ! ,tr9ity4 ,x 0 inevitable t !y %\ld ov]look ! same elem5t 9 ! inc>nate ,*ri/4 ,! ,neo-,platonic view ( matt] f9ds its c\nt]p>t 9 monophysite !ory4 ,! monophysites1 )\t =mally d5y+ its real exi/5ce1 nurs$ a ,mani*ean suspicion ( x4 ,x 01 to !m1 ! seat ( illusion2 x 0 an ob/acle to _s1 ! enemy ( spiritual developm5t4 ,if n unreal1 x 0 at any rate unwor?y4 ,! association ( ,*ri/ ) matt] ?r\gh ,8 body & ?r\gh ,8 human nature 01 9 _! eyes1 a degradation ( deity4 ,t ,*ri/ took matt] up into ,8 be+ z a p]man5t elem5t1 t ,he dignifi$ ! body & glorifi$ human faculties1 ^! facts seem$ to ! monophysite m9d improbable1 &1 if true1 devoid ( religi\s significance4 ,x came natural to him to expla9 ,*ri/'s body z a phantom4 ,he 0 prep>$ to reg>d ! human nature z unsub/antial4 ,! my/ic's view ( matt]1 ( s5se & human exi/5ce *>act]ises ! :ole monophysite outlook4 ,9 ! _s ( ,plot9us ! monophysites conceiv$ ! inc>nation z ! supreme example ( ! unio my/ica4 ,! unio my/ica 0 a /ate ( rapture1 abnormal & tempor>y 9 e>?ly exp]i5ce1 9 :i* ! id5tity ( ! my/ic 0 actually m]g$ 9 ! cosmic reason4 ,! l[] nature disappe>$ completely into ! high]4 ,x 0 absorption4 ,?is ^w absorption 0 9 common use among ! h]etics4 ,x 0 a trite say+ among ! fir/ g5]ation ( ! monophysites t ! human nature ( ,*ri/ 0 absorb$ 9 ! div9e1 z a drop ( honey 9 ! ocean4 ,!y conceiv$ ,8 ?\ght z lo/ 9 ! univ]sal reason1 ,8 w z surr5d]$ to ! w ( ,god1 ,8 human affections z fus$ 9 ! fire ( div9e feel+1 ,8 body z a phantom4 ,!y c\ld n admit t ,he liv$ ! real life ( a real man4 ,!y c\ld n see ! value ( su* a life4 ,neo-,platonism _h p>alys$ _! optic n]ve4 ,?9k]s su* z ! ,*ri/ologians ( ,alex&ria1 imbu$ ) ! _s ( ,neo-,platonism1 _h no motive = pres]v+ ! di/9ct subsi/5ce ( ,*ri/'s human nature4 ,x 0 _! boa/ t _! ,ideal _h fac$ & ov]come & trampl$ on ! l[] elem5ts ( ,8 be+4 ,he 0 a pro( f fact t body & s5se & all t is di/9ctively human c\ld be sublimat$ into ! univ]sal sub/ance1 :i* is ! prim>y efflu5ce ( ! ,plot9ian ,"o4 ,9 a ^w1 ! inc>nate ,*ri/ 01 to !m1 ! p]sonification ( ! ,neo-,platoni/ unio my/ica4 ,we may conclude ?is comp>ison ( monophysitism ) ,neo-,platonism by po9t+ out t ! two sy/ems _h a simil> be>+ on ! conduct ( life4 ,neo-,platonism 0 a religion4 ,its speculative aspect 0 subord9ate to its practical4 ,a k ( ! s\l's position 9 creation & ( its de/9y laid ! philosoph] "u /rict obligation4 ,fa/+ & self-d5ial 7 ess5tial prelim9>ies to ! high] my/ic practices4 ,ec/asy c\ld n be rea*$ until body & s5se _h be5 />v$ into complete submission4 ,monophysitism adopt$ ?is tradition1 & made ascesis ! c5tral duty ( ! ,*ri/ian life4 ,! monophysite *ur* became celebrat$ = ! l5g? & rigidity ( its fa/s4 ,! mona/ic elem5t dom9at$ its communion4 ,inde$1 x is h>dly too mu* to say t ! monophysite movem5t1 on its ext]nal side1 0 an attempt to capture ! ,*ur* = mona/ic pr9ciples4 ,! h]esy drew its inspiration f ! cloi/]4 ,! ,*ri/ ( ! monophysites _h )drawn f ! m>ket to ! wild]ness2 s ,8 foll[]s mu/ ne$s g out ( ! _w to foll[ 9 ,8 /eps4 #a ,h>nack1 ,hi/ory ( ,dogma1 vol4 iv4 *ap4 ii4 p4 #afj4 ,,*apt] ,,iii ,,monophysite ,,doctr9e ,! di/9ctive doctr9e ( monophysitism1 t f :i* ! "n ( ! h]esy is tak51 is ! ass]tion t !re is b "o nature1 ! div9e nature1 9 ,*ri/4 ,!re exi/$ "s diff]5ce ( op9ion among ! monophysites z to :e!r any degree ( reality might be ascrib$ to ! human nature4 ,"s 7 prep>$ to all[ x conceptual reality2 !y w\ld grant t ,*ri/ _h be5 diphysite mom5t>ily1 t ,he 0 out ( two natures4 ,b t admission is q inadequate4 ,x am\nts to no m ?an ! paltry concession t ,*ri/'s human nature be=e ! inc>nation is conceivable z a sep>ate entity4 ,all monophysites unit$ 9 condemn+ ! diphysite doctr9e t aft] ! inc>nation ,*ri/ 0 & is 9 two natures4 ,su* a ,*ri/ !y w\ld n wor%ip4 ,x 0 ! image ) two faces t ! ,c\ncil ( ,*alc$on _h set up4#a ,!y adopt$ ! ,a?anasian phrase1 ,"o inc>nate nature ( ,god ! ,^w1 z _! battle-cry4 ,monophysitism c make out a /rong prima facie case4 ,x is attractive at fir/ sight4 ,! h]etical =mula seems simpl] & m natural ?an ! ca?olic4 ,! unity ( nature appe>s a coroll>y ( ! unity ( p]son4 ,human p]sonality is ord9>ily assum$ to be monophysite2 s x is natural to make ! same assumption z to div9e p]sonality4 ,! simplicity ( ! doctr9e is1 h[ev]1 all on ! surface4 ,x w n be> exam9ation4 ,z a def9ition ( ,*ri/ian fai? x is useless4 ,x _c acc\nt = ! record$ facts ( ,*ri/'s life4 ,! facts ( ,8 body1 ( ,8 m9d1 ( ,8 suff]+s refuse to fit into x4 ,x af=ds no f\ndation = belief 9 ,8 transc5d5t "w4 ,no intelligible doctr9e ( r$emption c be built ^u x4 ,x conta9s no g]m ( hope = mank9d4 ,!re=e ! ,*ur* 9 ! "n ( ,*ri/ & on behalf ( humanity reject$ x4 ,al?\gh ! h]esy has be5 (ficially condemn$1 x %\ld none ! less be /udi$4 ,x is improbable t any "o 9 our "t w def5d ! =mula1 or op5ly pr(ess ! doctr9es t foll[ f x4 ,b1 ?\gh n recognis$ z su*1 x is an ev]-pres5t & in/ant m5ace to ! ,fai?4 ,monophysite t5d5cies are inh]5t 9 religi\s ?\ght4 ,! metaphysical idea1 on :i* x re/s1 /ill has a p[]ful hold ov] ! human m9d4 ,spiritually-m9d$ m5 are especially liable to ?is =m ( error4 ,x is a mi/ake to ?9k t ,*ri/ological que/ions 7 settl$ once & = all 9 ! fif? c5tury4 ,ea* g5]ation has to settle !m afre%4 ,accord+ly1 to exhibit ! consequ5ces ( ! monophysite =mula1 to %[ h[ wrong ab/ract ideas develop into wrong concrete ideas & falsify ,*ri/ian practice1 is a task ( practical & pres5t-day importance4 ,,classification ,,( ,,monophysite ,,errors ,two classes ( errone\s beliefs result f a misconception ( ! relation betwe5 ,god & man 9 ,*ri/4 ,!re arise1 on ! "o h&1 false op9ions ab\t ! deity ( ,*ri/1 & on ! o!r1 false op9ions z to ,8 manhood4 ,we %all adopt ?is classification z we inve/igate ! doctr9al consequ5ces ( ! monophysite =mula4 ,x is ! me?od foll[$ 9 "o ( ! e>lie/ sy/ematic criticisms ( ! h]esy4 ,leo's ,tome1 or lett] to ,flavian1 conta9s a lucid /atem5t ( ! ca?olic doctr9e ( ! inc>nation1 & an acute analysis ( ! sy/em ( ,euty*es1 ! h]esi>*4 ,he summ>ises ! errors ( ,euty*es "u two heads2 !re are two ma9 c\nts 9 8 indictm5t ( ! h]esy4 ,euty*es1 he cont5ds1 makes ,jesus ,*ri/ deus passibilis et homo falsus4 ,euty*es & 8 foll[]s compromis$ bo? deity & humanity4 ,! deity becomes passible1 ! humanity unreal4 ,all ! monophysite misbeliefs c be classifi$ "u "o or o!r ( ^! two heads4 ,,! ,,concept ,,impassibility ,,z ,,appli$ ,,to ,,deity ,we %all take fir/ ^? errors t compromise ! nature ( ! deity1 & %all preface our analysis by an explanation ( ! mean+ ( ! t]m deus impassibilis4 ,! impassibility ( ,god is ! corn]-/one ( spiritual mono!ism4 ,*ri/ianity owes x1 z a philosophic doctr9e1 l>gely to ,ari/otle4 ,he conceiv$ deity z actus purus1 z ! ,"o :o moves )\t be+ mov$1 a causa sui4 ,! popul> gods ( ,greece 7 passible2 !y 7 possible objects ( s5se2 !y 7 act$ on l>gely z man is act$ on4 ,!y _h a beg9n+1 & 7 subject to _m ( ! processes ( "t4 ,!y 7 sway$ by human motives4 ,!y 71 at times1 angry1 afraid1 unsatisfi$1 ambiti\s1 jeal\s4 ,ari/otle gave to ! _w ! conception ( a transc5d5t ,god1 a be+ :o is real & yet is )\t body1 p>ts & passions1 :o _c receive idolatr\s wor%ip1 & is n an object ( s5se4 ,impassibility 0 "o ( ! highe/ attributes ( ?is be+4 ,! attribute does n involve or imply abs5ce ( feel+4 ,orig9ally x _h no ref]5ce to feel+1 9 ! psy*ological s5se ( t ^w4 ,x c]ta9ly excludes incid5tally ! l[]1 specifically human feel+s1 feel+s caus$ by ext]nal /imuli1 feel+s due to want or to lack ( p[]4 ,x does n exclude ! high] affections f ! deity4 ,ev5 9 ! nsis noses ( ,ari/otle1 !re is room = ! transc5d5t bliss ( div9e self-contemplation4 ,mu* m 9 ! ,*ri/ian ,god is !re room = spontane\s feel+1 spr++ f ,8 own nature1 ! necess>y concomitant ( ?\ght & w4 ,impassibility is a compreh5sive attribute4 ,orig9ally negative1 x soon acquir$ a ri* positive connotation4 ,an impassible ,god is "o :o is outside space & "t4 ,! attribute connotes creative p[]1 et]nity1 inf9ity1 p]man5ce4 ,a passible ,god is corruptible1 i4e4 susceptible to ! processes ( becom+1 *ange1 & decay4 ,if to-day !i/s h to be on _! gu>d aga9/ debas$ conceptions ( deity1 9 ! plausible g>b ( an invisible k+1 ( a f9ite or suff]+ ,god1 mu* m 0 su* caution necess>y 9 ! e>ly c5turies ( ! ,*ri/ian era4 ,*ri/ians :o came daily & h\rly into contact ) poly!i/ic beliefs & practices _h to be v jeal\s = ! concept ( impassibility4 ,x repres5t$ to !m all t 0 di/9ctive 9 ! highe/ region ( _! ,fai?4 ,monophysitism1 z we proce$ to %[1 compromis$ ?is article ( ! ,fai?4 ,its adh]5ts did n1 p]haps1 d s int5tionally4 ,9 fact1 ! fir/ g5]ation ( monophysites ma9ta9$ t _! def9ition safegu>d$ ! impassibility4 ,x 0 zeal = ! hon\r ( ! ,son ( ,god t induc$ !m to d5y ,him all contact ) humanity4 ,_! good int5tions1 h[ev]1 c\ld n p]man5tly c\nt]act ! evil inh]5t 9 _! sy/em4 ,9 lat] g5]ations ! evil came to ! surface4 ,!opas*itism1 ! doctr9e t op5ly d5ies ! impassibility ( ! godhead1 fl\ri%$ 9 ! monophysite *ur*es4 ,,monism ,,entails ,a ,,debas$ ,,conception ,,( ,,deity ,! metaphysical basis ( monophysitism made ?is result inevitable4 ,extremes meet4 ,extreme spirituality readily passes into its opposite4 ,x cuts ! gr\nd f "u its own feet4 ,x so>s beyond its p[]s1 & falls into ! mire ( mat]ialism4 ,illu/rations ( ?is fact c be f\nd 9 ! hi/ory ( philosophy4 ,! ,/oics1 = in/ance1 contriv$ to be bo? pan!i/s & mat]iali/s4 ,com+ ne>] to our own "t1 we f9d ,hegelianism expla9$ 9 diametrically opposite ways4 ,aft] ,hegel's dea? 8 disciples split into oppos+ camps2 "o p>ty ma9ta9$ t ! real 0 _s1 ! o!r t x 0 matt]4 ,ea* p>ty claim$ ! au?ority ( ! ma/] = _! view4 ,! div]g5ce is easy to expla94 ,f spiritual monism x is a %ort /ep to mat]iali/ic monism4 ,= ! moni/1 all is on "o level ( be+4 ,he may by con/ant ef=t keep t level high4 ,b gravity w act4 ,we are m prone to degrade ,god to our level1 ?an to rise to ,84 ,! same tru? c be put 9 ab/racto4 ,unless ! relation betwe5 ,god & ! _w be pres]v$ z a true relation1 ! high] t]m w soon] or lat] fall to ! level ( ! l[]1 & be lo/ 9 x4 ,?is rule holds z well 9 movem5ts ( religi\s ?\ght4 ,! monophysite /rove = a l(ty conception ( deity b a*iev$ a l[ "o4 ,he und]m9$ ! doctr9e ( impassibility by ! v measures he took to secure x4 ,9 ! te*nical language ( ,*ri/ology ! monophysites' debas$ conception ( deity 0 a consequ5ce ( conf\nd+ ! natures4 ,attributes & actions1 belong+ prop]ly only to ,*ri/'s humanity1 7 ascrib$ recklessly to ,8 div9ity4 ,! te/ phrase !otokos1 invaluable z a prote/ aga9/ ,ne/orianism1 became a prec$5t = all sorts ( doctr9al extravagancies4 ,! fam\s addition to ! ,trisagion1 :o wa/ crucifi$ = u1 :i* = a "t won recognition z s\nd & ca?olic1 0 fir/ made by ! monophysite ,bi%op ( ,antio*4#b ,bo? ^! phrases h scriptural au?ority1 & !y are ju/ifi$ by ! communicatio idiomatum4 ,b !y are liable to misuse & mis9t]pretation4 ,all dep5d$ on h[ !y 7 said & :o said !m4 ,! monophysite meant "o ?+ by !m1 ! ca?olic ano!r4 ,! arrire p5se ( ! monophysite gave !m a wrong turn4 ,he 0 always on ! look-out = p>adox 9 ,*ri/'s life4 ,he emphasis$ su* phrases z appe>$ to detract f ! reality ( ,8 human exp]i5ces4 ,he spoke ( ,*ri/ z rul+ ! univ]se :5 ,he lay 9 ! mang]1 or z direct+ ! affairs ( nations f ! ,cross4 ,! ca?olic c approve ^! phrases2 9 ! m\? ( a monophysite !y h a h]etical s\nd4 ,!y sugge/ a passible ,god2 !y degrade ! inf9ite to ! level ( ! f9ite4 ,! monophysite conf\nds ! natures1 & s he has no "r to appeal to ! communicatio idiomatum4 ,unless ! idiomata are admitt$ z su*1 unless !y are pres]v$ 9 _! di/9ctness1 !re c be no communicatio betwe5 !m4 ,if !y are fus$1 !y _c act & react ^u ea* o!r4 ,! monophysite1 by id5tify+ ! natures1 =feits ! "r to use ! t]m ,!otokos & ! ,trisagion addition4 ,on 8 lips _! inevitable implication is a f9ite suff]+ ,god4 ,,monophysitism ,,& ,,! ,,doctr9e ,,( ,,! ,,tr9ity ,monophysitism 0 n orig9ally or p] se a ,tr9it>ian h]esy4 ,equally ) ca?olics & ,ne/orians its adh]5ts accept$ ! ,nic5e def9ition4 ,!y pr(ess$ to believe 9 "o ,god 9 ?ree co-equal p]sons4 ,?is belief1 firmly held 9 all t x involves1 w\ld h kept !m f attribut+ passibility to ! ,godhead1 & ultimately h neutralis$ ! errors ( _! ,*ri/ology4 ,b _! ,*ri/ology corrupt$ _! !ology4 ,ab&on+ all vital relation betwe5 ,god & man 9 ,*ri/1 !y ab&on$ ! relation 9 ! ,godhead4 ,! int]nal & ext]nal relations ( ! ,godhead are mutually dep5d5t4 ,if !re be no tr9ity ( p]sons1 ! inc>nation is impossible4 ,7 ,god a b>e monad1 ,he c\ld n imp>t ,himself & rema9 ,himself4 ,! fact t !re are relat$ p]sons 9 ! deity is ! only ju/ification = ! use ( ! phrases discuss$ 9 ! previ\s p>agraph4 ,:5 ! ca?olic says1 ,god 0 born1 suff]$1 di$1 he is "r1 because 8 presupposition is "r4 ,:5 ! monophysite uses ! same words1 he is wrong1 because 8 presupposition is wrong4 ,! ca?olic pres]ves 9 ! backgr\nd ( 8 ?\ght ! di/9ction betwe5 ! ousa & ! ?reefold hyp/asis1 betwe5 ! ess5tial godhead & ! ?ree p]sons4 ,s he is 9 no dang] ( ascrib+ passion to ! ess5ce or to ! p]sons ( ,fa!r or ,holy ,_s4 ,:5 he says ,god 0 born1 he is compress+ two /atem5ts into "o4 ,he means ,*ri/ 0 born1 & ,*ri/ 0 ,god4 ,n 9 respect ( :at ,he has 9 common ) ! o!r p]sons ( ! ,tr9ity1 b 9 respect ( ,8 prop]ty ( son%ip did ,he l[] ,himself to ! plane ( suff]+4 ,! ca?olic holds n a suff]+ ,god1 b a suff]+ div9e p]son4 ,he ma9ta9s an impassible ,god1 b a passible ,*ri/4 ,a dead ,god is a contradiction 9 t]ms2 a ,*ri/ :o di$ is ! hope ( humanity4 ,monophysite !ology became involv$ 9 fur!r emb>rassm5ts4 ,unwill+ness to attribute passibility to ,god1 c\pl$ ) ! desire to rema9 9 "s sort tr9it>ians1 =c$ _m ( ! monophysites into ! ,sabellian position4 ,deity1 !y said 9 effect1 did n suff] 9 ! second p]son ( ! tr9ity1 because !re is no su* p]son4 ,! p]sons ( ! tr9ity are simply *>act]s assum$ by ! monadic ess5ce1 or aspects "u :i* m5 view x4 ,on ?is %[+1 ! ,logos1 :o 0 inc>nate1 _h no p]sonal subsi/5ce4 ,! relation betwe5 ,god & man ev] rema9s imp]sonal4 ,*ri/1 qua div9e1 0 only an aspect or efflu5ce ( deity4 ,?is1 = ! monophysite1 0 ! "o alt]native to ! doctr9e ( a passible ,god4 ,he 0 fac$ ) a desp]ate dilemma4 ,if he reta9$ 8 belief 9 a transc5d5t ,god1 he mu/ surr5d] belief 9 a triune ,god4 ,he c\ld *oose betwe5 ! two2 b 8 ,*ri/ology p]mitt$ no ?ird *oice4 ,= him1 ! only alt]native to a f9ite ,god 0 a lone ,god4 ,z a result monophysite !ology oscillat$ betwe5 d5ial ( ! impassibility ( ,god & d5ial ( 8 ?ree-fold p]sonality4 ,9 ei!r case ! or?odox doctr9e ( ! godhead 0 ab&on$4 ,"o ( ! /ock que/ions prop\nd$ by ! ca?olics to ! monophysites 01 ,0 ! tr9ity incomplete :5 ! ,son ( ,god 0 on e>?8 ,! "q is crudely express$1 z x ignores ! type ( exi/5ce prop] to spiritual p]sonality2 b x conta9s a suffici5tly s\nd ad hom9em argum5t4 ,! monophysite c\ld n say yes1 or he w\ld !n be driv5 to ass]t a passible ,god4 ,if he said no1 8 reply 0 tantam\nt to ! ass]tion t ! :ole ess5ce ( ! ,godhead 0 inc>nate4 ,! logic ( ?is dilemma 0 s cog5t t n a few monophysites succumb$ to x1 & adopt$ a position simil> to t ( ! e>li] ,patripassiani/s4 ,^! sec$$ f ! monophysite *ur*1 & f\nd$ an indep5d5t sect1 call$ ! ,!opas*ites4 ,z (t5 happ5s1 ! sect is1 doctr9ally1 m repres5tative ?an ! p>5t body4 ,! ,!opas*ites 7 ! ?9k]s :o _h ! c\rage to pu% ! monophysite doctr9es to _! logical conclusions4 ,^? :o did n sec$e1 unable to def5d _! own doctr9al position1 retaliat$ ) ! c\nt]-*>ge ( tetra!ism4 ,?is /roke 0 simply a confession ( weakness4 ,monism 0 /rangl+ _! ,*ri/ianity at e turn4 ,in/ead ( break+ free f x1 !y pret5d$ t _! oppon5ts 7 poly!i/s4 ,! ca?olic1 h[ev]1 0 nei!r moni/ nor plurali/4 ,! inc>nation 0 n ! addition ( a f\r? div9e be+ to ! tr9ity4 ,! ess5ce ( ! godhead rema9$ complete1 un*ang$ & impassible2 :ile ! hypo/atic union ( ,god & man 9 ,*ri/ made possible ! assumption ( a passible nature by ! p]son ( ! ,son ( ,god4 ,,monophysitism ,,& ,,islam--,,sabellianism ,,! ,,connect+ ,,l9k ,x is 9 place "h to po9t out ! some:at intimate connection t exi/$ betwe5 monophysitism & ,islam4 ,! monophysites held ! outpo/s ( ! ,empire4 ,mahomet came into contact ) !m1 & x 0 probably f !m t he =m$ 8 conception ( ,*ri/ian doctr9e4 ,! lat] hi/ory ( ! monophysite *ur*es %[s t !y (t5 secur$ a l>ge measure ( tol]ation at ! h&s ( ! ,caliphs1 :ile ! diphysites 7 be+ rigor\sly p]secut$4 ,lapses to ,islam 7 n infrequ5t1 & 9 "s p]iods apo/asy on a l>ge scale occurr$4 ,cases are on record ev5 ( monophysite patri>*s :o abjur$ _! fai? & jo9$ ! foll[]s ( ! ,prophet4 ,! connection betwe5 monophysitism & ,islam 0 n =tuit\s4 ,!re 0 a doctr9al aff9ity betwe5 !m4 ,bo? sy/ems 7 rigidly mono!i/ic4 ,bo? degrad$ ! notion ( deity by a p]v]se attempt to exalt x4 ,bo? cut r$emption & m$iation out ( _! religion4 ,! family lik5ess betwe5 ! two sy/ems does n ext5d beyond ! realm ( ! doctr9e ( supreme deity4 ,9 o!r respects ! religion ( ! sword & ! religion ( love h little or no?+ 9 common4 ,cresc5t & ,cross are poles asund]4 ,! monophysites z a body rema9$ nom9ally & 9 int5tion ,*ri/ians & tr9it>ians4 ,b 9 ! doctr9al area specifi$ ! resemblance holds4 ,x c\ld h>dly be o!rwise4 ,sabellian t5d5cies 7 always pres5t & p[]ful 9 ! monophysite communion1 & ,sabellianism is a long /ep 9 ! direction ( ,islam4 ,sabellius taught 9 effect1 ,allah is "o4 ,! ?ree p]sons1 = him1 7 only aspects ( ! "o indivisible deity4 ,!re are no di/9ct entities correspond+ to ! names ( ,fa!r1 ,son & ,holy ,_s4 ,sabellianism is intimately associat$ ) monism 9 all its phases4 ,monophysitism be+ ess5tially moni/ c\ld n escape ! ta9t4 ,:e!r ,sabellianism made ! h]etics monophysites1 or monophysitism made !m ,sabellians1 we ne$ n inquire4 ,! two cre$s are b\nd up 9 ! same bundle by ! tie ( monism4 ,! relation ( ! ,son to ! ,fa!r & ! relation ( ! ,son to humanity are vitally connect$4 ,misconception ( ! "o relation entails misconception ( ! o!r4 ,d5ial ( relation 9 ! godhead goes h& 9 h& ) d5ial ( relation 9 ,*ri/4 ,if ! !ologian r$uces ! latt] to b>e unity1 he does ! same = ! =m]4 ,ca?olic ,*ri/ology is ?us a necess>y d$uction f tr9it>ian dogma4 ,nicaea necessitat$ ,*alc$on4 ,to safegu>d ! di/9ction ( p]sons 9 ! godhead1 a di/9ction 9 ! natures ( ,*ri/ 0 ess5tial4 ,to pres]ve intact ! latt] di/9ction1 ! proprium ( ! ,son & ,8 p]sonal subsi/5ce _h to be kept di/9ct f ! proprium & subsi/5ce ( ! ,fa!r4 ,,! ,,*ri/ological ,,errors ,,( ,,monophysitism ,we leave "h ! area ( !ology & come to t ( ,*ri/ology4 ,we h exhibit$ ! monophysite errors ) respect to ! doctr9e ( primal deity2 we n[ proce$ to analyse _! views ) respect to ! inc>nate ,*ri/4 ,! =m] subject leads ! ?9k] into deep wat]2 ! layman is out ( 8 dep? 9 x2 s x does n furni% mat]ial = a popul> controv]sy4 ,x is o!rwise ) ! latt] subject4 ,"h ! issue is n>r[$ to a po9t4 ,x becomes a "q ( fact1 namely1 ,0 ,*ri/ a real man8 ,! "q & mo/ ( ! answ]s giv5 to x are readily intelligible1 & !y naturally gave rise to heat$ controv]sy4 ,!opas*itism is1 z we h %[n1 a t5d5cy inh]5t 9 ! h]esy1 b "o sl[ to come to ! surface1 & "o easily c\nt]-act$ & suppress$ by ! p]sonal piety ( ! monophysite4 ,its docetism1 ! ass]tion ( ! unreality ( ,*ri/'s human nature1 lies on ! surface4 ,no am\nt ( p]sonal piety c neutralise x4 ,x has _h1 & /ill has1 a crippl+ effect on ! fai? ( dev\t ,*ri/ians4 ,ev5 :]e x is n c>ri$ to ! l5g? ( =mal h]esy1 x spreads a haze ( unreality ov] ! gospel /ory1 & dulls ! edge ( belief4 ,! second c\nt ( ,leo's *>ge aga9/ ! monophysites 01 x w be rememb]$1 t _! pres5tation ( ,*ri/ made ,him homo falsus4 ,"u ?is head+ homo falsus may be class$ a wide gr\p ( errone\s t5ets1 rang+ f ! crudities ( e>ly docetism to ! subtleties ( ,apoll9>ianism4 ,we propose to sket* ^? ( major importance4 ,no attempt w be made to take !m 9 _! hi/orical ord] or hi/orical sett+4 ,fur!r1 x is n impli$ t !y all =m$ "p ( ! (ficial doctr9e ( ! monophysite *ur*4 ,! /&>d ( belief 9 t communion 0 con/antly v>y+1 & ! hi/ory ( its dogma w\ld ne$ a "w to itself4 ,we %all deal ) ^? ,*ri/ological errors1 :i*1 :e!r "p ( ! (ficial monophysite cre$ or n1 are logical results ( ! monophysite =mula4 ,unreality may be pr$icat$ ( ,*ri/'s human nature z a :ole1 or 9 respect ( its p>ts4 ,consub/antiality ) humanity may be d5i$ ( ! :ole ( 8 human nature2 or defici5cy 9 "o or o!r ( ! ess5tial con/itu5ts ( human nature may be alleg$4 ,we %all deal fir/ ) ^? errors t conc]n ! entire nature1 com+ lat] to ! errors 9 respect ( "o or m ( its sev]al p>ts4 ,suspicion ( ! reality ( ,*ri/'s human nature z a :ole is *>act]i/ic ( all monophysite ?\ght4 ,?is suspicion1 n always =mulat$ or express$1 is ev]y:]e pres5t4 ,if ! monophysites admitt$ ! fact ( ,8 true manhood1 !y d5i$ or neglect$ ! religi\s value ( t fact4 ,_! spuri\s spirituality rebell$ aga9/ a dogma :i* seem$ to tie ! inf9ite d[n to a po9t 9 hi/ory4 ,! fact t ! ,son ( ,god liv$ a p]fect human life conta9$ no inspiration = !m4 ,!y idealis$ ! inc>nation4 ,x 0 n = !m a hi/orical ev5t4 ,?is is a coroll>y to ! proposition1 ma9ta9$ by _! great *ampion1 ,philox5us1 t no addition to ,8 p]son took place4 ,x is tantam\nt to say+ t ! union ( div9e & human 9 ,*ri/ is purely conceptual4 ,:5 ! monophysite fac$ ! "q1 ,:at *ange 9 ,*ri/ did ! inc>nation effect8 8 =mula con/ra9$ him to reply1 ,x made no *ange4 ,! deity ( ! p]son 0 n d5i$4 ,! pre-exi/5t ,logos & ! ,*ri/ :o walk$ 9 ,galilee 7 admitt$ly "o & ! same4 ,! second p]son ( ! tr9ity & ,jesus ( ,naz>e? 7 "o p]sonality4 ,if ,be?lehem made no *ange 9 t p]sonality1 x 0 purposeless1 & ! import ( ! inc>nation disappe>s4 ,,! ,,monophysite ,,!ory ,,( ,a ,,composition ,,( ,,natures ,= ! consi/5t monophysites1 !n1 ! human nature1 z a psy*ic entity ) peculi> prop]ties1 did n survive ! inc>nation4 ,!y did1 h[ev]1 all[ x a v]bal reality4 ,!y admitt$ a composition ( natures1 & ?is composition provid$ = !m :atev] degree ( reality ! inc>nation possess$4 ,on ?is po9t _! ,*ri/ology pass$ ?r\gh sev]al /ages ( developm5t1 ! lat] /ages %[+ progressive improvem5t on ! e>li]4 ,!y di/+ui%$ ?ree s5ses ( ! ^w composition4 ,fir/1 !y said1 x might mean absorption1 z :5 a drop ( wat] is absorb$ 9 a j> ( w9e4 ,second1 x might imply ! transmutation ( con/itu5t p>ticles1 z :5 a ?ird unlike ?+ is =m$ f two4 ,?irdly1 !re is composition :51 f ! association ( two :ole & entire ?+s1 a ?ird :ole & entire comp\nd ?+ is =m$ )\t loss to ! compon5ts4 ,!y illu/rat$ ! ?ird mode ( composition by ! union 9 man ( s\l & body4 ,! pre-,euty*ian monophysites reg>d$ ! hypo/atic union z a composition 9 ! fir/ s5se ( ! ^w4 ,!y spoke ( ,*ri/'s human nature z absorb$ 9 ! div9e1 z is a drop ( v9eg> 9 ! ocean4 ,euty*es adopt$ ! t]m 9 its second s5se4 ,he taught t ! ,^w became fle%#c z ! atmosph]e assumes bodily =m & becomes ra9 or sn[ "u ! influ5ce ( ! w9d1 & z wat] becomes ice by reason ( ! cold air4 ,philox5us 9 a lat] g5]ation saw t bo? ^! positions 7 wrong & ! similes mislead+4 ,he taught a hypo/atic union totally devoid ( confusion or loss or commutation ( ! elem5ts ( ! two natures4 ,to illu/rate 8 mean+ he us$ ! simile suppli$ by ! ,a?anasian cre$1 z ! reasonable s\l & fle% is "o man1 s ,god & ,man is "o ,*ri/4 ,?is position is a va/ improvem5t on t ( ! orig9al monophysites4 ,x 0 gr\nd ga9$ to secure ! admission t 9 any s5se ,*ri/ 0 v man4 ,b ! monophysites nev] le>n$ ! true mann] ( ! union1 namely1 t ,*ri/ 0 "o2 n by conv]sion ( ! ,godhead into fle%1 b by tak+ ( ! ,manhood into ,god2 "o altoge!r2 n by confusion ( ,sub/ance b by unity ( ,p]son4 ,read 9 ?is connection ! ass]tion t ,god & man is "o ,*ri/1 z ! reasonable s\l & fle% is "o man1 is or?odox2 read ap>t f ?is context1 x is ambigu\s4 ,if ! simile be kept z a simile1 z a m]e sugge/ion or h9t z to h[1 9 g5]al1 two may compose "o & yet rema9 two1 !n no exception c be tak5 to x4 ,if1 h[ev]1 ! clause be int]pret$ z a proportion sum1 assign+ correspond+ values to ! diff]5t t]ms1 !n x sav\rs /rongly ( ,apoll9>ianism4 ,mo/ monophysites1 l _m mod]ns1 probably und]/ood x 9 ! ma!matical s5se4 ,*ri/1 !y argu$1 0 ,god & man1 j z man is rational s\l & body2 ! t]ms are 9 proportion2 !re=e ! div9e nature 0 ! rational s\l1 & ! human nature 0 ! body4 ,!y =got t ! free act ( ! :ole div9e p]son 9 assum+ man und]lies ! union & makes x efficaci\s2 !y gave srx2 ! n>r[ mean+ ( sma1 !y set be=e !mselves ! picture1 n ( ! inf9ite rob+ 9 ! f9ite1 b ( ! union ( m9d & matt]4 ,consequ5tly !y habitually spoke ( ! ,logos1 z assum+1 n man or a human nature1 b a body4 ,su* 9 its v>y+ phases 0 ! monophysite doctr9e ( composition4 ,at its wor/1 x conta9$ a direct d5ial ( ! real humanity ( ,*ri/4 ,at its be/1 x falls f> %ort ( ! ca?olic doctr9e ( ,8 real1 p]fect & complete humanity4 ,! p]man5t assumption ( human nature into ! transc5d5t p]sonality _h no mean+ = ! h]etic p>ty4 ,if x _h tak5 place1 x 01 !y ?\ght1 m]ely mom5t>y1 ) no aft]-effects1 ! pass+ ( a summ] cl\d across ! face ( ! sun4 ,we h consid]$ ! monophysites' view ( ,*ri/'s human nature1 reg>d$ z an integral psy*ic entity4 ,x is evid5t t !y ei!r und]valu$ x or d5i$ its exi/5ce4 ,! m consi/5t ?9k]s ( _! p>ty ma9ta9$ t ! inc>nation _h made no diff]5ce 9 ! be+ ( ,*ri/1 & t !re=e ,8 human nature _h no objective reality4 ,^? :o %rank f c>ry+ ! doctr9e to t l5g? conc$$ to ! or?odox t ! inc>nation _h to "s ext5t modifi$ ! be+ ( ,*ri/1 t its net result 0 a composition4 ,fur!r analysis %[$ t ?is concession 0 r5d]$ nugatory2 t 9 :atev] s5se ! ^w composition 0 tak51 x 0 inadequate to express ! hypo/atic union2 t ! composition prov$ 9 its fir/ significance illusory1 9 its second1 hybrid\s1 9 its ?ird1 ,apoll9>iani/4 ,we pass on n[ to review ! human nature 9 its con/itu5t p>ts1 & x w be se5 t ! h]etical =mula und]m9es fai? 9 respect ( ea* sev]al "p4 ,,! ,,p>ts ,,( ,,human ,,nature ,f ! /&po9t ( psy*ology human nature is divisible into p>ts4 ,! division mu/ n be tak5 z absolute2 = ! :ole is a unity1 & ! p>ts are n discrete quanta4 ,! division is r a classification ( psy*ic /ates accord+ to pr$om9at+ features4 ,! classification corresponds1 h[ev]1 to ! facts ( exp]i5ce1 & s psy*ology is ju/ifi$ 9 mak+ use ( x4 ,we %all adopt x 9 our inve/igation ( ! psy*ology ( ,*ri/4 ,! %>pe/ divid+ l9e is t betwe5 immat]ial & mat]ial1 betwe5 s\l & body4 ,! /ates ( ! s\l fall into ?ree well-m>k$ gr\ps1 ?\ght1 w1 & feel+4 ,! physical & ! psy*ic are n always di/+ui%able4 ,/ill m unc]ta9 & t5tative is ! id5tification 9 ! psy*ic ( cognitive1 volitional1 & emotional faculties4 ,b 9 e man ^! p>ts are f\nd4 ,!y are con/itu5ts ( human nature4 ,!re may be o!r elem5ts z yet unanalys$2 b !re c be no complete humanity t is defici5t 9 respect ( any ( ^! p>ts4 ,we propose to take !m s+ly 9 ! above ord]1 to %[ _! exi/5ce 9 ! hi/oric ,*ri/1 & to expose ! monophysite attempts to expla9 !m away4 ,,*ri/',s ,,body ,x is obvi\s to an unprejudic$ read] ( ! gospels t ,*ri/'s pre-resurrection body 0 real & normal4 ,x 0 an organism ( fle% & blood1 ( ! same con/itution & /ructure z ours4 ,x occupi$ space1 & 0 ord9>ily subject to ! laws ( space4 ,x 0 visible & tangible4 ,x %>$ ! natural processes ( bir?1 gr[?1 & metabolism4 ,at ! resurrection a cata/rophic *ange took place 9 x4 ,x 0 /ill a body4 ,x 0 /ill ,*ri/'s body4 ,cont9uity 0 pres]v$4 ,! evid5ces ( cont9uity 7 ext]nal1 & s /rong z to conv9ce d\bt]s4 ,we _c fa?om ei!r ! *ange or ! cont9uity4 ,:at we "k is t aft] ! resurrection ! body 0 n s subject z be=e to ! laws ( space4 ,x 01 x w\ld seem1 ( f9] atoms & subtl] texture4 ,x _h rea*$ ! height ( physical be+1 & developm5t app>5tly _h ceas$4 ,x 0 ! entele*y ( ! human body4 ,x 0 /ill real1 ?\gh no long] normal4 ,to employ p>adox1 x 0 natural ( ! species sup]natural4 ,x 0 ! natural body rais$ to a high] p[]4 ,x 0 natural to human d5iz5s ( a high] _w4 ,body's function is two-fold4 ,x bo? limits ! s\l & expresses x4 ,x n>r[s ! activity ( ! p]son to a po9t1 & ?us s]ves z a f9e in/rum5t = action ^u matt]4 ,at ! same "t x draws out ! pot5tialities ( ! s\l & fixes its developm5t4 ,! po/-resurrection body 0 app>5tly less limitative & m expressive4 ,! =ego+ consid]ations may be summ$ up 9 ! =m ( ?ree dogmata1 all ( :i* or?odox ,*ri/ianity tea*es4 ,^! are1 fir/1 t ,*ri/'s pre-resurrection body 0 real & natural2 second1 t ,8 resurrect$ & asc5d$ body is real & sup]natural2 ?ird1 t !re 0 a real cont9uity1 :e!r by developm5t or by epig5esis betwe5 ! two4 ,9 all ^! po9ts ! monophysites miss$ ! tru?4 ,_! presuppositions misl$ !m4 ,z moni/s !y 7 incl9$ to reg>d matt] z s9ful4 ,!y c\ld n conceive ! inf9ite donn+ a soil$ robe4 ,our body ) its hateful wants c\ld n1 !y ?\ght1 be a tab]nacle = ! ,logos4 ,! idea ( ! native dignity ( ! human frame & ( its be+ ennobl$ by ! ,k+'s indwell+ 0 completely =eign to ! monophysites' ways ( ?9k+4 ,s9ce su* 0 ! backgr\nd ( _! ?\ght x 0 inevitable t def9itely h]etical doctr9es %\ld result4 ,9 ! fir/ place we meet ! flat d5ial ( ! reality ( ,*ri/'s body4 ,ev5 9 apo/olic days ^? :o held ?is h]esy 7 f\nd4 ,!y d5i$ t ,*ri/ _h come 9 ! fle%4 ,!y 7 /yl$ doceti/s or phantasia/s4 ,accord+ to !m ! body _h no objective reality4 ,x 0 a phantom4 ,its reality 0 entirely subjective4 ,x 0 ! effect produc$ on ! p]ceptions ( ^? :o associat$ ) ! my/]i\s _s-be+4 ,! ,logos1 z view$ by ! phantasia/s1 at ! inc>nation /ruck ,8 be+ into ! b\nds ( "t1 b n ( space4 ,div9e p]sonality1 !y ?\ght1 did n require & c\ld n use a mat]ial m$ium4 ,?is doctr9e 0 n "p ( ! (ficial monophysite cre$2 b1 z po9t$ out 9 ! previ\s *apt]1 monophysitism 0 a l9eal desc5dant ( docetism1 & always %[$ traces ( its l9eage4 ,! say+ t1 ,*ri/ br\ght ,8 body f heav51 0 commonly attribut$ to ,euty*es4 ,he d5i$ hav+ said x1 b1 at any rate1 ! g5]al feel+ ( 8 foll[]s 0 t ,*ri/'s physical nature 0 div9e & !re=e n consub/antial ) ours4 ,su* doctr9es de/roy ! discipl9e ( fai? 9 ! resurrection4 ,! radical diff]5ce betwe5 ! natural & ! resurrection body is blurr$ by !m4 ,! imm5se *ange is aboli%$4 ,! resurrection becomes purely a spiritual *ange1 :i* ev5 a non-,*ri/ian c\ld accept4 ,! body1 accord+ to ! t5or ( monophysite tea*+1 0 _s be=e ! resurrection & _s aft] x4 ,?us ! asc5sion too becomes purely spiritual4 ,x is %orn ( half its significance4 ,! ,*ri/ian's hope = ! human body re/s on ! fact t ,*ri/ return$ to heav5 ) some?+ t ,he did n br+ f heav51 namely1 a glorifi$ human body4 ,if ,he br\ght t body ) ,him f heav51 ! ma9 significance ( ,8 human disp5sation falls to ! gr\nd4 ,! inc>nation becomes unreal1 illusory1 impot5t4 ,an (f%oot ( docetism t fl\ri%$ among ! monophysites is ! aph?>todocetic h]esy4 ,?is is ( consid]able hi/orical importance4 ,l>ge numb]s ( ! ,syrian & ,egyptian monophysites embrac$ x1 & sec$$ f ! p>5t *ur*4 ,x became "p ( ! (ficial cre$ ( ,arm5ian ,*ri/ianity1 & t *ur* has n repudiat$ x to ?is day4 ,!re are good1 ?\gh h>dly conclusive1 gr\nds = hold+ t ! emp]or ,ju/9ian1 pr(\nd !ologian & life-long *ampion ( or?odoxy1 0 conv]t$ to ! h]etical !ory 9 ! la/ few mon?s ( 8 life4#d ,aph?>todocetism1 affirm+ ! reality ( ,*ri/'s body1 d5ies t x 0 subject to ! we> & te> ( life4 ,! body1 z ?is h]esy taught1 0 sup]ior to natural process2 x 0 nei!r corrupt$ nor corruptible4 ,! t]m corruptibility has ! wide significance ( organic process1 t is ! lot ( all creat$ liv+ ?+s4 ,a mild] =m ( ! h]esy ass]t$ t ,*ri/'s body 0 corruptible b 0 n corrupt$4 ,aph?>todocetism spr+s f a spuri\s spirituality1 f a fa/idi\sness t has no place 9 true religion4 ,x is symptomatic ( ,mani*eanism1 :i* associates matt] ) s94 ,*ri/ians affirm s9lessness ( ,*ri/'s humanity2 !y d n affirm immat]iality ( ,8 body4 ,! monophysites1 9 ab&on+ ! true ,*ri/ology1 7 pr$ispos$ to ! infection ( ?is h]esy4 ,a be+ 9 :om organic process 0 pres5t seem$ to ^! h]etics no fit object ( wor%ip4 ,!y call$ ! or?odox ,cti/olatrae or ,ph?>tolatrae1 wor%ipp]s ( ! creat$ or corruptible4 ,monophysites ( all %ades ( op9ion unit$ 9 condemn+ ! practice ( wor%ipp+ ,*ri/'s human nature4 ,t practice 0 9 _! eyes bo? idle & injuri\s2 idle1 because ! human nature did n exi/ z a sep>ate entity2 injuri\s1 because x fix$ ! m9d ( ! wor%ipp] on ! f9ite4 ,9 consequ5ce !y 7 mu* oppos$ to all obs]vances bas$ on a belief 9 ,8 humanity4 ,images or o!r repres5tations ( ,him 9 human =m seem$ to !m idolatr\s4 ,! monophysite *ur* 0 n directly conc]n$ 9 ! iconocla/ic controv]sy1 b _! doctr9es 7 indirectly responsible = x4 ,9 fact ! great monophysites1 ,sev]us & ,philox5us1 h be5 /yl$ ! fa!rs ( ! iconocla/s4 ,,monophysitism ,,bl9d ,,to ,,! ,,dual ,,"* ,,( ,,*ri/',s ,,exp]i5ce ,su* 7 ! difficulties & errors into :i* _! ,*ri/ology =c$ ! monophysites ) respect to ,*ri/'s body4 ,difficulties equally great & errors equally fatal att5d$ _! attempt to conceive ! conjunction ( psy*ic elem5ts ) ! div9e p]son4 ,_! =mula 0 too n>r[4 ,x compell$ !m to %ut _! eyes to "o out/&+ fact1 namely1 ! duality ( ,*ri/'s e>?ly exp]i5ce4 ,?is fact confronts ! read] on e page ( ! gospels4 ,! duality is deep-seat$2 x ext5ds to ea* psy*ic elem5t1 yet /ops %ort ( ! p]sonality4 ,9 ! _w ( ,*ri/'s nature !re are two hemisph]es4 ,8 exp]i5ces are on two planes4 ,9 bo? ( ^! hemisph]es or planes we f9d ?\ght1 w1 & feel+4 ,8 ?\ght on ! high] plane is radically diff]5t 9 mode & scope f ,8 ?\ght on ! l[] plane4 ,! two are ( a diff]5t ord]4 ,! same diff]5ce holds ) respect to ! o!r two psy*ic elem5ts4 ,we propose to exemplify ?is ass]tion1 fir/1 9 ! case ( cognition1 & !n 9 ! case ( w & feel+4 ,?is proc$ure w simplify ! task ( expos+ ! fur!r consequ5ces ( ! monophysite ,*ri/ology4 ,,! ,,duality ,,( ,,*ri/',s ,,cognition ,! duality ( ,*ri/'s intellectual exp]i5ce is evid5t to a ,new ,te/am5t /ud5t :o has any acqua9tance ) psy*ology4 ,we f9d 9 ,*ri/ two cognitive faculties ) two dom9ant univ]ses ( ?\ght & k4 ,on occasions ,he speaks & acts z if ,he read at a glance all ! secrets ( nature & ! human he>t1 z if all "t pa/1 pres5t1 & future 0 an op5 book to him1 z if ,he 7 9 ! c\nsels ( ! ,mo/ ,high4 ,on ^? occasions div9e intuition sup]s$$ 9 ,him ! sl[ & faulty me?ods ( human intellig5ce2 ?\ght 0 vision1 intellect intuition1 k omnisci5ce4 ,?us ,8 div9e nature cognis$ & knew4 ,t1 h[ev]1 is only "o half ( ! picture4 ,on o!r occasions 8 m9d appe>s to h be5 p]fectly human4 ,8 intellig5ce & p]ceptive faculties diff]$ n ess5tially f ours4 ,he ask$ que/ions & s\ght in=mation4 ,he us$ human categories4 ,he progress$ 9 wisdom4 ,! developm5t ( ,8 m9d 0 gradual4 ,8 k 0 relative to ,8 age & surr\nd+s4 ,memory & oblivisc5ce1 ^? complem5t>y & p]haps con/itu5t elem5ts ( s\l-be+1 att5tion1 s5sation1 recognition1 & discursive reason+1 all ^! exhibitions ( ! work+s ( ! normal m9d appe>$ 9 ,*ri/4 ,9 ?is mann] ,8 human nature cognis$ & knew4 ,,monophysitism ,,entails ,,! ,,apoll9>ian ,,view ,,( ,,*ri/',s ,,human ,,nature ,,z ,,m]ely ,,an ,,animat$ ,,body ,! ,ca?olic welcomes ^! evid5ces ( ! duality ( ,*ri/'s intellectual life4 ,on ! !oretical side1 !y confirm ! c5tral dogma ( or?odox ,*ri/ology4 ,on ! practical side1 !y give him au?ority = seek+ ,*ri/'s sympa?y 9 matt]s intellectual4 ,he realises t s9ce ,*ri/ und]/&s ! education ( ! m9d & c %>e 8 intellectual difficulties1 !re is hope = ! r$emption & reg5]ation ( ! highe/ "p ( 8 nature4 ,! monophysite f9ds nei!r support = 8 dogma1 nor inspiration = life1 9 ! fact t ,*ri/ _h a human m9d4 ,he is bl9d to ! fact4 ,he has se5 half ! picture & reg>ds x z ! :ole4 ,8 ideal is a be+ 9 :om intuition sup]s$es intellect1 ^: k is imm$iate1 absolute1 & complete4 ,! or?odox :o held t ,*ri/ _h &1 at ord9>y times1 us$ a human reason1 p]fect ( its k9d1 b /ill human 9 all ! implications ( ! ^w1 7 9 8 eyes ,agnotae2 !y 7 unbeliev]s :o ass]t$ ! ignorance ( ,*ri/ & set b\nds to ! vision & k ( ! inf9ite4 ,! monophysite w\ld modify 8 op9ions & approa* ! ca?olic position on o!r doctr9al po9ts1 b nev] on ?is4 ,he might be p]suad$ to admit t ,*ri/'s body & animal s\l 7 real & human1 b to ! consub/antiality ( ,*ri/'s m9d ) man's he w\ld n subscribe4 ,! ,apoll9>ian /ra9 9 monophysitism 0 p]si/5t4 ,! lat] monophysites nev] succe$$ 9 bani%+ x f _! sy/em4 ,by ,apoll9>ianism ! humanity ( ,*ri/ is crippl$ 9 its highe/ memb]4 ,x is a realm %orn ( its faire/ prov9ce4 ,accord+ to ,apoll9>is1 all t ,*ri/ assum$ 0 an animat$ body4 ,8 !ory is l an +5i\s sy/em ( canal locks = lett+ div9e p]sonality desc5d f ! upp] to ! l[] wat]s4 ,! +5uity display$ 9 x condemns x4 ,x is an artificial make%ift4 ,! psy*ology on :i* x re/s is antiquat$4 ,! picture ( ,*ri/ x pres5ts does n correspond to ! record$ facts ( ,8 life4 ,*ri/'s human nature1 z *isell$ by ! ,apoll9>ian sculptor1 is a torso4 ,su* an image fails to satisfy ! dem&s ( religi\s feel+1 & ! doctr9es1 ,apoll9>ian & monophysite1 t en%r9e x are !re=e valueless4 ,,two ,,wills ,,9 ,,*ri/ ,we "h leave ! subject ( cognition & pass to t ( volition4 ,or?odoxy tea*es t ,*ri/ _h two wills4 ,?is doctr9e has a d\ble basis4 ,9 ! fir/ place1 x is a coroll>y ( ! doctr9e ( two natures4 ,9 ! second1 x is e/abli%$ by ! record$ facts ( ! gospel n>rative4 ,to take fir/ ! a priori argum5t4 ,a nature )\t a w is inconceivable4 ,a cognitive faculty )\t ! dynamic ( ! volitional w\ld be a ma*9e )\t driv+ =ce4 ,! absurdity ( ! supposition1 inde$1 is n fully br\ght out by ! simile4 ,= we c consid] ! ma*9e at re/2 x w\ld !n h exi/5ce & pot5tial activity4 ,w1 h[ev]1 is ess5tial to ! exi/5ce z well z to ! activity ( ?\ght4 ,! connection betwe5 !m is vital to bo?4 ,! psy*ologi/ di/+ui%es ! respective p>ts ea* plays 9 life & m>ks (f faculties to correspond to ea*4 ,b 8 di/9ction is only provisional4 ,! two develop p>i passu1 !y are nev] sep>able2 !y act & re-act on "o ano!r4 ,)\t "s degree ( att5tion !re is no ?\ght1 n ev5 p]ception ( ext]nal objects4 ,att5tion is z mu* an act ( w z ( ?\ght4 ,man does n fir/ evolve ideas & !n summon w to actuate !m4 ,9 ! v =mation ( ideas w is pres5t & active4 ,accord+ly f ! duality ( ,*ri/'s cognitive nature ! psy*ologi/ w\ld inf] t ,he _h two wills4 ,!re is 9 ,*ri/ ! div9e w t controll$ ! =ces ( nature & c\ld susp5d _! normal work+s1 ! w t wr\ght miracle1 ! et]nal w1 inf9ite 9 scope & p[]1 t 0 objectifi$ 9 ,8 age-long univ]sal purpose1 9 a ^w1 ! w t und]took ! sup]human task ( cosmic recon/ruction & a*iev$ x4 ,x is n easy = u to conceive ! co-exi/5ce ( two wills 9 "o p]son4 ,! difficulty is "p ( ! discipl9e ( fai?4 ,*ri/'s human w is no less a fact ?an ,8 div9e w4 ,! =m] play$ z l>ge a "p 9 ,8 e>?ly exp]i5ce z ! latt]4 ,x 0 pres5t 9 all its normal phases1 rang+ f motor w to psy*ic resolve4 ,! l[] =ms ( volition1 motor impulse1 desire & wi%1 ! high] =ms1 delib]ation1 *oice1 purpose & resolve4 ,he %>$ !m all ) humanity4 ,!re is 9 ,him a human w1 limit$ 9 scope1 v>y+ 9 int5sity1 develop+ ) ! gr[? ( ,8 human exp]i5ce1 a w l ours 9 ev]y?+1 except t x 0 free f moral imp]fection4 ,x 0 a f9ite w1 inasmu* z ! condition+ cognition 0 f9ite1 p]fect ( its k9d1 adequate to its task1 nev] falt]+1 yet ( f9ite /r5g?4 ,! two wills h ea* _! own sph]e4 ,!y op]ate 9 p]fect h>mony4 ,only at crises1 su* z ! ,agony1 is !re any appe>ance ( discord4 ,! opposition !re is only app>5t4 ,! human w rea*es its limit1 & ! sup]human w int]poses to p]=m ! sup]human task4 ,! reality ( ! two wills1 e/abli%$ = ! or?odox bo? a priori & by an appeal to fact1 is d5i$ by ! monophysite4 ,he reg>ds w z ! fundam5tal psy*ic /ate & makes x an attribute ( p]sonality4 ,two wills1 he says1 w\ld necessitate two p]sons4 ,he does n see t p]sonality lies deep] ?an w1 & t w & cognition are co-ord9ate attributes ( nature4 ,if ,*ri/ _h b "o nature1 x foll[s t ,he _h b "o w & op]ation4 ,! monophysite ?9ks ( two wills z necess>ily antagoni/ic1 z are conflict+ motives 9 man2 s he sees no e?ical value 9 di!lite doctr9e4 ,z a matt] ( fact ! moral influ5ce ( ,*ri/ianity w\ld be mu* weak5$ by an ab&onm5t ( ! doctr9e ( two wills4 ,! belief 9 ,*ri/'s human w prev5ts m5 f despair+ ( _! w4 ,human w _c be :olly w>p$1 or :olly misdirect$1 or utt]ly p[]less1 s9ce ,*ri/ 9 ,8 life has %[n t x c "w along ! same l9es z ! div9e w1 t ! two c co-op]ate1 & t :]e ! l[] rea*es its limit1 ! high] c /ep 9 & p]fect ! "w4 ,f ! hi/orian's po9t ( view ! mono!lite controv]sy is q di/9ct f ! monophysite4 ,s we ne$ only take a glance at x "h4 ,x orig9at$ 9 an attempt to w9 back ! monophysites to ! or?odox communion by a doctr9al compromise4 ,! emp]or ,h]aclius endeav\r$ to unite ca?olic & monophysite on ! basis ( ! =mula1 two natures ) "o w & op]ation4 ,t =mula w n be> analysis1 & ! emp]or's attempt to use x z an eir5icon 0 a complete failure4 ,imp]ial pressure induc$ a few monophysites to modify _! doctr9e s f> z to admit "o !&ric op]ation2 b ! concession ( "o w f ! or?odox side fail$ to w9 f ! monophysites ! expect$ concession ( two natures4 ,! monophysites 7 q consi/5t "h4 ,to d5y w ( nature is an elem5t>y mi/ake 9 psy*ology4 ,only a tyro 9 introspection w ascribe w directly to p]sonality4 ,a "o-will$ two-natur$ p]sonality is little %ort ( a psy*ological mon/rosity4 ,an attempt to rally ,*ri/5dom r\nd su* a figure 0 b\nd to fail4 ,! only la/+ result ( ! emp]or's activity 0 ! =mation ( a new sect1 ! ,m>onites4 ,,! ,,duality ,,( ,,*ri/',s ,,emotional ,,exp]i5ce ,we come n[ to ! ?ird elem5t 9 ! human _s4 ,x is only 9 mod]n psy*ology t feel+ has secur$ recognition z a di/9ct con/itu5t ( man's nature2 s x is n surpris+ t ! "q z to its position 9 ! inc>nate ,*ri/ 0 n rais$ 9 =m] days4 ,n[1 h[ev]1 ! psy*ology ( feel+ has come into its own1 & x has become important to consid] :e!r 9 ?is p>ticul>1 too1 ,*ri/ %>$ our human exp]i5ce4 ,"h1 aga91 ! argum5t = ma9ta9+ ! duality ( ,*ri/'s emotional exp]i5ce is tw(old4 ,x foll[s1 on ! "o h&1 f ! duality ( ! o!r p>ts ( ,8 nature2 &1 on ! o!r h&1 x is prov$ by ! facts ( ,8 life z record$ 9 ! gospels4 ,human nature involves feel+1 & two natures involve two univ]ses ( feel+4 ,div9e p]sonality _c be conceiv$ z devoid ( feel+4 ,) m5 feel+ lies 9 ! dep?s ( be+2 x is ! dynamic ( life4 ,feel+ is ! inn] reflex ( acts ( ?\ght & w4 ,x inv>iably accompanies cognition & volition4 ,if ?\ght & w be attribut$ to ! supreme be+1 ! attribute ( feel+ _c be left out4 ,:5 ! ,god 9 ,*ri/ act$1 div9e feel+ accompani$ ! act4 ,?is surmise is prov$ correct on ref]5ce to ! records ( ,8 life4 ,we f9d !re two di/9ct emotional zones4 ,*ri/ has all ! blameless feel+s natural to man4 ,!re are 9 ,him ! feel+s accompany+ s5sation2 physical pleasure & pa91 hung]1 ?ir/1 we>9ess1 &1 9 addition1 ! high] grades ( feel+1 ae/hetic1 sympa!tic1 & e?ical4 ,he exp]i5c$ wond]1 surprise1 righte\s ang]1 ! sublime1 joy & love4 ,a life ri* 9 emotion 0 ! life ( ! ,man ,*ri/ ,jesus4 ,:51 h[ev]1 we look m closely into ,8 exp]i5ce1 we cat* glimpses ( feel+ su* z no man c\ld "k4 ,we see !re transc5d5t passion1 great sorr[1 great joy1 s great t !y w\ld break a human he>t4 ,we may in/ance ! deep emotion accompany+ ,8 resolve to g to meet ,8 fate at ,j]usalem1 ! rejoic+ 9 _s at ! success ( ! apo/les' mission1 ,8 ,agony & ,8 univ]sal love4 ,! monophysites c\ld n recognise ?is duality 9 ,*ri/'s emotional nature4 ,hung] & ?ir/1 & ev5 ! high] human feel+s !y consid]$ d]ogatory to ! ,son ( ,god4 ,ev5 :5 !y admitt$ t ,he suff]$1 !y ?rew a veil ( my/]y ov] ,8 suff]+s4 ,!y idealis$ ! ,passion4 ,!y made x seem z if ,8 fle% 0 privileg$1 z if ,8 omnipot5ce excus$ ,him f ! emotional exp]i5ces ( humanity4 ,,summ>y ,,( ,,! ,,*apt] ,we h exam9$ ! doctr9e ( "o nature1 & expos$ its *ief consequ5ces4 ,we h consid]$ its effects 9 respect ( ! deity ( ,*ri/ & 9 respect ( ,8 manhood4 ,we h appli$ ! doctr9e to ! human nature z a :ole1 & to ! sev]al p>ts t compose x4 ,! result ( ! exam9ation may be summ>is$ 9 brief4 ,monophysitism de/roys :at is div9e 9 ! deity & :at is human 9 ! humanity4 ,x (f]s to ,*ri/ians a ,*ri/ :o is n suffici5tly above man to be able to help !m by ,8 p[]1 nor suffici5tly man to be able to help !m by ,8 sympa?y4 ,! monophysite ,*ri/ is nei!r v ,god nor v man1 b a composition 9 :i* all traces ( ! orig9al entities are lo/ to view4 #a ,! ,*ronicle ( ,za*>iah ( ,mityl5e1 translat$ by ,hamilton & ,brooks1 *ap4 iii4 p4 #df4 #b ,?is addition to ! ,trisagion 0 (ficially condemn$ at ! close ( ! #g? c5tury ow+ to its monophysite associations4 #c ,*ronicle ( ,za*>iah ( ,mityl5e1 translat$ by ,hamilton & ,brooks1 ii4 #b1 p4 #ba4 #d ,! "q ( ,ju/9ian's or?odoxy has be5 debat$ by ,bury & ,hutton4 ,see ,gu>dian1 ,m>* #d? & ,april #ae?1 #ahif4 ,,*apt] ,,iv ,,! ,,e?os ,,( ,,monophysitism ,monophysitism orig9at$ 9 a mona/]y4 ,euty*es1 ! fa!r ( ! monophysites1 0 a monk4 ,! mona/ic temp]am5t is peculi>ly susceptible to ?is h]esy1 & ! mona/ic elem5t has always be5 dom9ant 9 ! monophysite *ur*es4 ,! cloi/] is ! natural habitat ( ! doctr9e ( ! "o nature4 ,mona/icism is appli$ monism4 ,if ! _w's exi/5ce be a %am1 if its value comp>$ ) ,god be negligible1 x becomes a religi\s duty to avoid all influ5ces t height5 ! illusion ( ! _w's real exi/5ce & intr9sic value4 ,! moni/1 l ! monk1 mu/ r5\nce all secul> int]e/s & g out ( ! _w4 ,! pa? ( r5unciation _h an additional claim on ! ,*ri/ological moni/4 ,9 8 univ]sal ideal1 z manife/$ 9 "t1 ! human elem5ts 7 sublimat$ into ! div9e4 ,consequ5tly 8 ideal ( conduct impos$ a negative attitude t[>ds ! _w & a m]g+ ( 8 ego 9 ! univ]sal _s4 ,^! are ! rul+ elem5ts 9 ! _s ( ! cloi/]1 & ^! are ! *>act]i/ics ( ! monophysite e?os4 ,^? m51 to :om ,god is ! sum ( all reality & ! _w m]ely a cosmic %ad[1 reg>d wor%ip z ! sole wor?y activity ( ! human _s4 ,9 wor%ip union ) ,god is s\ght1 a union s close t ! p]sonality ( ! wor%ipp] is absorb$ into ! be+ ( ! wor%ipp$4 ,8 exp]i5ce ( ,god is s intimate t 8 exp]i5ce ( ! _w is r$uc$ to insignificance4 ,z an ov]p[]+ human love welds two be+s into "o1 & id5tifies _! ?\ghts1 wills1 spr+s ( action & ev5 feel+s1 s ! amor dei id5tifies man ) ,god & makes possible a deification ( humanity4 ,deeply religi\s natures 9 all ages h he>d ?is my/ic call4 ,to lose _! ego 9 ! div9e _s is ! height ( _! religi\s ambition4 ,! conception is l(ty1 b x is n ! ,*ri/ian ideal ( life & duty4 ,my/icism & monophysitism are tw9 sy/ems4 ,bo? are religi\s phases ( pan!ism4 ,z1 to ! intellect1 acosmism is ! coroll>y ( pan!ism1 s1 to ! he>t1 asceticism foll[s f my/icism4 ,:e!r conceiv$ 9 t]ms ( exi/5ce or ( value1 ! _w = ! my/ic is an ob/acle to ! unio my/ica4 ,x sn>es ! m9d ?r\gh ! s5ses & creates a fictiti\s -appe>ance ( solid reality 9 s5su\s objects4 ,x makes pret5sions to goodness & atta*es to itself a spuri\s value4 ,! only rem$y is self-d5ial1 d5ial ( exi/5ce to ! _w1 d5ial ( cr$5ce to ! s5ses1 d5ial ( gratification to ! passions1 desires1 & incl9ations4 ,! monophysites 7 my/ics4 ,!y 7 ! rigori/s ( ! ea/]n *ur*4 ,!y =m$ ! no compromise p>ty4 ,!y /ood = a ?or\gh-go+ r5unciation ( ! _w & ! fle%4 ,?\gh !y did n (ficially lay d[n ! inh]5t evil ( matt]1 ,mani*eanism is lat5t 9 _! sy/em4 ,!y did n explicitly id5tify matt] ) ! _s ( evil1 b !y _h ! spiritual man's suspicion ( matt] & 8 contempt = ! body ( ! fle%4 ,ab/95ce1 mortification ( ! fle%1 & all ascetic practices fl\ri%$ 9 _! communion4 ,art & culture 7 suspect2 !y _h no eye = natural beauty4 ,"s ( _! hymn-writ]s possess$ consid]able poetic ta/e2 b poetry 0 disc\rag$ by _! lead]s4 ,sev]al ( ! extant lett]s ( ,sev]us ( ,antio* %[ t t patri>* did 8 be/ to bani% t art f 8 *ur*4 ,8 attitude may be ga!r$ f ! foll[+ quotation4#a ,z to ,m>tyrius1 ! poet1 444 ,i wi% y to "k t he is a tr\ble to me & a nuisance4 ,inde$ 9 ! case ( ! o!rs also :o foll[ ! same pr(ession1 & 7 enroll$ 9 ! holy cl]gy ( ! ,*ur* t is ) u1 ,i h deb>r$ !m f practis+ su* poetry2 & ,i am tak+ mu* tr\ble to sev] ?is !atrical pursuit f ecclesia/ical gravity & mode/y1 a pursuit t is ! "m ( laxity & is also capable ( caus+ y\?ful s\ls to relax & ca/+ !m into ! mire ( =nication1 & c>ry+ !m to be/ial passions4 ,! result ( ?is asceticism 0 a jaundic$ & inhuman outlook on life4 ,!re 0 mu* piety among ! monophysites1 b x 0 conf9$ to a n>r[ *annel4 ,_! zeal = purity ( doctr9e am\nt$ to fanaticism2 _! hatr$ ( ! ,ne/orian & ( ! ,mel*ite at times rea*$ a :ite heat4 ,tol]ation 0 almo/ unkn[n 9 _! communion4 ,! claims ( humanity appeal less to a monophysite ?an to o!r ,*ri/ians4 ,he places all life's values 9 ! o!r _w4 ,he has no motive = try+ to ameliorate ! lot ( 8 fell[-m54 ,social s]vice has to him little or no div9e sanction or religi\s value4 ,we are speak+ only ( g5]al t5d5cies4 ,no foll[] ( ,*ri/1 h[ev] p]v]t$ 8 views1 c\ld be totally indiff]5t to ! welf>e ( o!r m52 b x came natural to ! monophysite to ?9k t x does n matt] mu* h[ a man lives 9 ?is _w ( %ad[s1 provid$ he holds communion ) ! _w ( unse5 realities4 ,! same motive acc\nts = ! rapid decl9e ( mission>y activity 9 _! communion4 ,! ,ne/orians 7 f> m active propag&i/s4 ,wor%ip is a v high type ( s]vice2 b wor%ip becomes selfi% & sick5s into s5tim5t1 if x neglects ! inspir+ tonic ( contact ) human ne$4 ,! monophysite ,*ri/ology enc\rag$ t =m ( self-sacrifice1 ^: goal is ,nirvana1 :i* lapses lazily into ! cosmic s\l & loses itself !re 9 contemplation & ec/asy4 ,x supplies no motive = t f9] piety :i* manife/s itself 9 e?ical endeav\r & practical philan?ropy4 ,8 ,*ri/ _h n p>tak5 ( ! cup ( suff]+4 ,8 ,*ri/'s advance to human p]fection 0 illusory4 ,s ! monophysite c\ld n look = ! sympa?y ( ,*ri/ 9 8 own /ruggles1 nor c\ld he appeal to ,*ri/'s example 9 respect ( works ( human *>ity4 ,monophysitism consid]s only ! religi\s nature ( man1 & takes no acc\nt ( 8 o!r ne$s4 ,we mu/ !re=e *>act]ise ! sy/em z unsocial1 unlovely1 unsympa!tic4 ,! uncompromis+ attitude ( ! individual monophysites 0 reflect$ 9 _! ecclesia/ical polity4 ,we _c b admire _! /urdy indep5d5ce4 ,! monophysite *ur* /ood = fre$om f /ate control4 ,h] pr9ciples 7 ! traditional pr9ciples ( ! ,alex&rian see4 ,alex&ria w\ld n truckle to ,con/ant9ople1 nor let religion subs]ve imp]ial policy4 ,%e w\ld all[ ! ca?olic p>ty to be ,mel*ites 7,k+'s m57 & to reap all ! temporal advantages accru+ to ! e/abli%$ *ur*4 ,9 ?is matt] ! monophysites took a n>r[ view2 b _! n>r[ness ev9ces _! piety4 ,!y felt ! evils att5dant on ,con/ant9e's gr& settlem5t1 & !y made _! ill-judg$ prote/4 ,!y made x = no unwor?y motive4 ,!re are always su* ?9k]s 9 ! *ur*4 ,a spiritual en?usia/ despises ! outw>d dignity t ! *ur* ga9s f an alliance ) ! ,/ate1 & is (t5 bl9d to ! spiritual b5efits conf]r$ on ! nation by t alliance1 :ile he conc5trates 8 gaze on incid5tal evils4 ,to connect ) ,*ri/ology su* an attitude t[>ds ! pr9ciple ( ,e/abli%m5t may seem =c$ at fir/ sight4 ,! connection1 h[ev]1 exi/s4 ,indep5d5ce ( ! temporal p[] is symptomatic ) t unworldl9ess :i*1 z we h %[n above1 *>act]ises monophysitism4 ,its adh]5ts paid no respect to ! human z su*4 ,!y atta*$ no value to m]ely human in/itutions1 & made no attempt to see or fo/] ! div9e t is 9 !m4 ,! argum5t t because ! ,/ate is a human in/itution x %\ld h no voice 9 ecclesia/ical policy is typically monophysite2 x is ! argum5t ( "o :o c\ld draw no inspiration f ! human life ( ! ,son ( ,god4 ,my/icism & rationalism h mu* 9 common4 ,!y bo? are elem5ts 9 ! m5tal composition ( almo/ e s]i\s ?9k]4 ,! /]ility ( logic (t5 drives him to seek a high] & sur] in/rum5t ( k4 ,s !re is no inconsi/5cy 9 fur!r *>act]is+ ! monophysites z rationali/s4 ,! intellectuals ( ! ea/]n *ur* 7 f\nd mo/ly 9 _! communion4 ,!irs 0 ! =mal logic po9t ( view4 ,*ri/1 !y urg$1 0 "o & n two2 !re=e ,8 nature 0 "o & n two4 ,!y c\ld n see t ,he 0 bo?4 ,9 ,b]gsonian language1 !y us$ exclusively me*anical categories4 ,intellig5ce1 an in/rum5t =m$ by contact ) matt]1 de/9$ = action ^u matt]1 !y us$ on a supra-mat]ial subject4 ,_! ?9k]s 7 highly tra9$ logicians2 !y revell$ 9 ab/ract argum5t2 !irs 0 a cold intellectual metaphysic1 unw>m$ by fle% & blood empiricism4 ,_! n>r[ outlook on life1 _! religi\s zeal & _! rationali/ philosophy comb9$ to produce 9 !m sect>ianism ( an extreme type4 ,p>ty _s ran high among !m4 ,!y f\ght ! ca?olics2 !y f\ght ! ,ne/orians2 !y f\ght "o ano!r4 ,! li/ ( s*isms t occurr$ 9 _! communion is ( amaz+ l5g?4 ,! lett]s ( ,sev]us ( ,antio* make sad read+4 ,!y %[ u t ! patri>* _h con/antly to int]f]e 9 cases ( disput$ succession to bi%oprics4 ,at almo/ e vacancy 9 ! prov9cial dioceses !re 7 p>ties =m$ ea* ) _! own nom9ee1 ready to s*ismatise if !y c\ld n secure recognition & consecration = him4 ,x is evid5t t monophysitism does n fo/] ! g5]\s1 tol]ant1 humane virtues ( ,*ri/ianity4 ,x is ! cre$ ( monks1 my/ics1 & intellectuali/s4 #a ,e4 ,w4 ,brooks1 ,select ,lett]s ( ,sev]us ( ,antio*1 vol4 ii4 pp4 #hh1 #hi4 ,,*apt] ,v ,,monophysitism ,,& ,,mod]n ,,psy*ology ,*ri/ology divorc$ f empirical psy*ology is a b>r5 sci5ce4 ,ab/ract discussions ab\t p]son1 nature & union ( natures soon deg5]ate into logoma*ies4 ,if p]sonality is a psy*ic entity1 & nature ano!r di/9ct psy*ic entity1 !n ! "q at issue betwe5 diphysite & monophysite is wor? debat+4 ,if !y are concepts m]ely1 ! debate is holl[ & ( purely academic int]e/4 ,a /udy ( psy*ology clo!s ! dry bones ) fle%4 ,x puts life & mean+ into ^! ab/ractions4 ,x %[s t !y repres5t entities1 t some?+ correspond+ to ! t]ms p]son & nature is actually "p ( ! be+ ( e man1 & t !re=e _! exi/5ce 9 ,*ri/ is a prop] & practical subject = inve/igation4 ,9 s do+ psy*ology provides ! rationale ( ! ,*ri/ological controv]sies4 ,x ju/ifies ! *ur* 9 h] det]m9$ adh]5ce to ! precise expression ( ! tru?4 ,no ,*ri/ian ) p[]s ( introspection1 :o c di/+ui% 9 8 own be+ p]sonality & nature1 c be indiff]5t to ! ,*ri/ological problem4 ,! problem is "o ( fact1 n !ory4 ,! t]ms & ! =mula are only ( importance z express+ or fail+ to express ! true facts ( ,*ri/'s be+4 ,9 a ^w1 ! psy*ology ( ! c5tral figure ( human hi/ory is ! matt] at issue4 ,ref]5ce to psy*ological fact is :at "o misses 9 ! records ( ! old controv]sies4 ,! disputes read z if !y 7 ab\t %ad[s4 ,no d\bt t 0 (t5 ! case4 ,ca?olics & non-,ca?olics 7 (t5 agre$ z to ! sub/ance ( belief1 :ile ow+ to _! devotion to words & =mulae ! agreem5t w5t unrecognis$4 ,_h ! disputants made cle> to !mselves & to ea* o!r :at !y meant by _! ab/ract t]ms1 _h !y translat$ !m into _! concrete psy*ological equival5ts1 h]esy & s*ism w\ld h be5 less frequ5t4 ,x 01 h[ev]1 almo/ impossible = !m to d s1 because 9 _! day !ology 0 f> m highly develop$ ?an psy*ology4 ,sy/ematic obs]vation ( ! work+s ( _s 0 almo/ unkn[n4 ,!re exi/$ no sci5ce ( psy*ology z we "k x4 ,no cle> notions atta*$ to ! t]ms p]son & nature4 ,!y repres5t$ ab/ractions necess>y to discursive reason r ?an concrete psy*ic facts4 ,all p>ties %>$ ?is defect4 ,among ca?olics & ,ne/orians z well z among monophysites k ( ! con/itu5ts ( human nature 0 ( ! mo/ rudim5t>y "*4 ,! ca?olic p>ty1 h[ev]1 by keep+ close to ! facts record$ 9 ! gospels1 a*iev$ a ,*ri/ological =mula t is psy*ologically intelligible2 :ile ! h]etical p>ties 7 l$ by _! preconceiv$ op9ions to fa%ion a ,*ri/1 ^: features are unrecognisable z ,god or man1 a psy*ological mon/rosity4 ,,b]gson',s ,,!ories ,,?r[ ,,light ,,on ,,*ri/ology ,)\t claim+ f9ality = ! f9d+s ( mod]n psy*ology1 we c consid] "s results ( ! sci5ce z e/abli%$4 ,!y are suffici5tly well e/abli%$1 at any rate1 to provide a />t+-po9t = our inve/igation4 ,9 p>ticul> ! brilliant obs]vations & !ories ( ,m4 ,b]gson ?r[1 s x seems to ! writ]1 a flood ( light on ,*ri/ology4 ,we propose to outl9e ! two key doctr9es ( ! ,b]gsonian psy*ology & %[ h[ !y confirm ! tru? ( ! or?odox =mula & expose ! monophysite fallacy4 ,^! key doctr9es are1 fir/1 ! int]p5etration ( psy*ic /ates1 &1 second1 ! di/9ction betwe5 deep-seat$ & sup]ficial consci\sness4 ,,b]gson',s ,,!ory ,,( ,,! ,,int]p5etration ,,( ,,psy*ic ,,/ates ,x is1 says ,b]gson1 *>act]i/ic ( psy*ic /ates t !y d n1 l mat]ial ?+s rema9 ext]nal to "o ano!r4 ,!y int]-p5etrate4 ,cut up by human intellig5ce into discrete elem5ts1 9 _! own nature !y rema9 a cont9uum4 ,/ates ( m9d appe> successive & ext]nal to "o ano!r1 because age-long association ) matt] has accu/om$ m5 to mat]ial modes ( ?\ght4 ,man's intellig5ce is a by-product ( activity4 ,= purposes ( action x is ! ext]nality ( ?+s t matt]s4 ,! inn] connection is relatively unimportant4 ,m5 act ) precision on matt]1 because p]ception cuts up ! cont9uum ( matt] into bodies1 def9$ bodies no two ( :i* c occupy ! same space4 ,intellig5ce orig9at+ ?us by contact ) matt] naturally pref]s me*anical categories4 ,^! categories applicable to matt] :5 appli$ to high] =ms ( exi/5ce mislead4 ,we naturally conceive psy*ic /ates z ext]nal to "o ano!r1 & _! int]p5etration seems an abnormality4 ,at ?is /age ( ?\ght exp]i5ce is pictur$ z a l9e ( indef9ite l5g?1 inf9itely divisible1 ^: divisions correspond to ! mom5ts ( consci\sness4 ,?is spatial picture ( m9d is mislead+ 9 _m ways1 n ! lea/ 9 t x c (f] no reasonable !ory ( ! subconsci\s4 ,?9k]s :o mat]ialise m5tal exp]i5ce h no room 9 _! !ory = ! sub-consci\s4 ,x is = !m b>e non-consci\sness1 a psy*ic vacuum4 ,:51 h[ev]1 we />t f ?is unique *>act]i/ic1 t m9d possesses1 ( rema9+ "o & indivisible ?r\gh\t ! greate/ appe>ance ( div]sity1 ! sub-consci\s falls naturally into ! s*eme4 ,no "p ( our exp]i5ce p]i%es4 ,x is ess5tially self-p]petuat+ memory4 ,! ne$s ( action relegate ! great] portion ( x to ! sub-consci\s1 b x is !re1 always l9k$ to our consci\s exp]i5ce1 & only await+ ! occasion to em]ge into ! full light ( consci\sness4 ,pa/ p5etrates into ! pres5t4 ,"o portion ( our pres5t p5etrates into ! o!r portions4 ,consci\s & unconsci\s1 pa/ & pres5t1 comb9e to =m "o wond]ful :ole4 ,,monophysitism ,,ignores ,,! ,,duality ,,9 ,,*ri/',s ,,exp]i5ce ,su* 9 outl9e is ,b]gson's !ory ( ! int]p5etration ( psy*ic /ates4 ,if ?is psy*ology be adopt$1 ! ab/ract "* ( ! ca?olic doctr9e ( ,*ri/'s be+ 9 l>ge measure disappe>s4 ,x becomes easy to conceive ! int]p5etration ( two natures 9 "o ,*ri/4 ,fur!r1 ! ,b]gsonian psy*ology furni%es a /&po9t f :i* criticism ( monophysitism is easy4 ,psy*ology at ! monophysite /age ( ?\ght conceives ! mom5ts ( ,*ri/'s consci\sness 9 _! mutual ext]nality2 !y foll[ ea* o!r z d ! ticks ( a clock4 ,!y are discrete elem5ts /rung along on a hypo!tical ego4 ,*ri/'s exp]i5ce is conceiv$ z unil9e>4 ,all t ,he did1 suff]$ & ?\ght is reg>d$ z hav+ tak5 place on "o & ! same plane ( exp]i5ce4 ,?is psy*ology has no room = ano!r plane ( exp]i5ce4 ,x has no room = a positive sub-consci\sness4 ,consequ5tly t "o plane mu/ be ! "o div9e nature1 :i*1 z ! monophysites taught1 absorb$ ! human4 ,! "o-nature !ory is n true to ! facts4 ,x ov]looks ! complexity ( ,*ri/'s exp]i5ce4 ,8 exp]i5ces lie on two diff]5t planes4 ,he has diff]5t univ]ses ( ?\ght1 diff]5t actuat+ wills & sets ( feel+s4 ,*ri/ is n 9 "o nature4 ,! phases ( ,8 consci\sness are tw(old4 ,8 exp]i5ces fall naturally into two gr\ps4 ,:ile "o gr\p is 9 consci\sness1 ! o!r is bel[ ! level ( consci\sness4 ,n[ ! human exp]i5ces1 n[ ! div9e1 are upp]mo/4 ,bo? are always pres5t4 ,life "u su* conditions is inconceivable1 unless full recognition be accord$ to ! fact t consci\s /ates int]p]meate4 ,if ea* /ate fall outside ! o!r1 & consci\sness be a *a9 ( successive ideas or emotions1 a tw(old nature )9 ! "o exp]i5ce is mean+less4 ,! view ( consci\s /ates z discrete leads inevitably to det]m9ism4 ,! place ( "o /ate 9 ! *a9 is condition$ by its pr$ecessor4 ,!re is no room = ! spontaneity & ! creative p[] :i* *>act]ise consci\s life4 ,associationism _c c\nt5ance ! un=ese5 & incalculable4 ,s x is out ( sympa?y ) ,*ri/ian psy*ology4 ,a function ( ! div9e 9 ,*ri/ is to introduce ! elem5t ( ! un=ese5 & incalculable into ,8 normal & human exp]i5ce4 ,! ,b]gsonian psy*ology ?us supplies an intellectual basis = belief 9 ! possibility ( two natures 9 ,*ri/4 ,:5 ideas are reg>d$ z psy*ic entities ^: ess5tial prop]ty is mutual p5etration1 ! gr\nd is prep>$ = ! ca?olic =mula4 ,:]e ?is tru? is n recognis$1 !re arises inevitably ! t5d5cy to ass]t t ,*ri/ _h & mu/ h _h b "o uni=m level ( exp]i5ce1 & t ass]tion is ! ess5ce ( monophysitism4 ,,b]gson',s ,,!ory ,,( ,,deep-,,seat$ ,,& ,,sup]ficial ,,/ates ,b]gson's psy*ology ?r[s fur!r light on a c5tral doctr9e ( ca?olic ,*ri/ology4 ,x n only makes conceivable1 z we h %[n above1 ! co-exi/5ce ( ! two natures1 b x l5ds support to ! belief 9 ! indep5d5t reality ( ,8 p]sonality4 ,p]son & nature ( ,*ri/ology f9d _! mod]n equival5ts 9 ! ,b]gsonian deep-seat$ & sup]ficial /ates ( consci\sness4 ,b]gson draws a %>p l9e ( di/9ction betwe5 ^! two4 ,! deep-seat$ /ates con/itute ! k]nel ( be+4 ,!y are ! man's exi/5ce turn$ inw>ds4 ,!y are indep5d5t1 free1 creative4 ,!y are a unify+ =ce4 ,always pres5t1 !y only r>ely make _! pres5ce felt4 ,only at mom5ts ( deep exp]i5ce d !y int]f]e ) ! surface self4 ,! sup]ficial /ates =m ! outw>d-reg>d+ exi/5ce ( man4 ,!y repres5t consci\sness relax$ into mom5ts ( clock-"t1 mom5ts m or less ext]nal to "o ano!r4 ,!y are n truly free4 ,!y are condition$ by ! mat]ial environm5t4 ,:atev] be ?\ght ( ! metaphysic ( ?is sy/em1 recognition _c be refus$ to t "p ( x :i* re/s on ! solid f\ndation ( psy*ological fact4 ,self-analysis discloses a two-fold exp]i5ce 9 man4 ,! /ream ( 8 life conta9s bo? curr5t & und]curr5t4 ,! curr5t is nature1 ! "u-curr5t p]sonality4 ,,monophysitism ,,annuls ,,! ,,di/9ction ,,betwe5 ,,div9e ,,p]son ,,& ,,div9e ,,nature ,?is di/9ction is ( p>am\nt importance 9 ,*ri/ology4 ,diphysites hold fa/ to ! di/9ction4 ,!y ma9ta9 a human nature 9 ,*ri/1 b !y d n humanise ,8 p]son4 ,! p]son _c be humanis$4 ,x rema9$ div9e aft] ! inc>nation1 z x 0 be=e4 ,?\gh ,he became man1 ! dep? ( ,8 be+ 0 un*ang$4 ,! ra9 f heav5 & ! wat]s f ! e>?ly spr+ m+le 9 "o /ream1 b b5ea? ! surface ! deep und]curr5t ( be+ fl[s on un*ang$4 ,! monophysite 9 effect ab&ons ?is di/9ction4 ,?is is :]e 8 psy*ology is mo/ s]i\sly at fault4 ,he confuses p]son & nature4 ,deep-seat$ & sup]ficial /ates ( s\l are all "o to him4 ,he does n see ! duality 9 ! be+ ( 8 fell[-m52 s he _c see x 9 ! ideal man4 ,?is is a consequ5ce ( monophysitism :i* has n attract$ ! att5tion ( !ologians1 & :i* ! monophysite himself did n int5d4 ,! doctr9e t rules out ! human nature ( ,*ri/ rules out ! div9e nature also1 by confus+ x ) ! p]sonality4 ,! monophysite affirms ! div9e nature :ile d5y+ ! human4 ,su* affirmation is purely v]bal4 ,x is completely void ( significance4 ,! contra/ betwe5 ! div9e & human natures is ne$$ to ?r[ p]sonality into relief4 ,take away ! human nature1 & t contra/ disappe>s1 & ) x goes ! di/9ction betwe5 div9e p]son & div9e nature4 ,!n1 in/ead ( a transc5d5t p]sonality 9 ^: portrait div9e & human features are di/9ctly limn$1 we h a blur4 ,:]e ,god plann$ a unique ?\gh intelligible psy*ic h>mony1 we f9d a psy*ic m$ley4 ,,consci\sness ,,( ,,p]sonality ,,produc$ ,,by ,a ,,viol5t ,,*ange ,,( ,,occupation ,?is ass]tion is ju/ifi$ by an appeal to human exp]i5ce4 ,m5 become sure ( _! own or ( o!r p's p]sonality by exp]i5c+ /rong contra/s ( natures 9 !mselves or by obs]v+ !m 9 o!rs4 ,= in/ance1 a sudd5 & viol5t *ange ( occupation e/abli%es p]sonality z a di/9ct entity4 ,! civilian turns soldi]4 ,almo/ imm$iately all p>ts ( 8 nature are affect$4 ,he feels ! developm5t1 z x 71 ( a second nature )9 him4 ,8 faculties are trans=m$4 ,he ent]s a new univ]se ( ?\ght4 ,8 range ( k n>r[s 9 "o direction1 wid5s 9 ano!r4 ,8 volitional nature is alt]$4 ,8 w n>r[s 9 scope1 b increases 9 int5sity4 ,nor does 8 emotional nature escape ! *ange4 ,ae/hetic values are rev]s$4 ,he no long] feels pleasure & pa9 at ! old objects4 ,physical desires play a mu* l>g] "p 9 8 life1 & he loses ta/e = intellectual pleasures4 ,! soldi] returns to civilian life &1 z x 71 ) 8 civilian attire he resumes 8 =m] nature1 & all 8 old ?\ghts & feel+s & impulses come flood+ back4 ,su* an exp]i5ce is ( consid]able psy*ological int]e/4 ,x exemplifies ! int]p5etration ( diff]5t /ates ( ?\ght & activity4 ,! contra/s br+ home to a man ! fact t 8 _s is a syn!sis ( het]og5e\s elem5ts4 ,!y =ce him back on himself4 ,!y r\se 9 him ! dormant s5se ( p]sonal be+4 ,x is ! appreh5sion ( /rong contra/ 9 8 exp]i5ce ( himself1 ! appreh5sion ( ! plurality ( 8 be+1 t acc5tuates ! deep-ly+ unity4 ,! m viol5t ! *ange 9 ! walks ( life1 ! cle>] becomes ! concept ( ! cont9uity4 ,civilian or soldi]1 ! man1 ! p]son is ! same4 ,p]sonality is ?r[n into relief n only by *ange ( occupation1 b also by moral contra/s4 ,conflict+ passions1 oppos+ motives & int]nal debate s]ve to make a man realise himself4 ,/rong p]sonalities are (t5 ^? 9 :om ! conflict betwe5 good & evil is mo/ acute4 ,x is ! v opposition ( natures :i* br+s out ! p]sonal elem5t into ! full light ( consci\s recognition4 ,we mu/ n[ exam9e human p]sonality 9 great] detail2 we mu/ indicate its functions & %[ h[ x diff]s f human nature4 ,only by com+ to grips ) ?is psy*ological problem is x possible to appreciate ! po9ts at issue 9 ! ,*ri/ological "q & to judge betwe5 ca?olic & monophysite4 ,,kant ,,& ,,! ,,dual ,,"* ,,( ,,! ,,ego ,kant di/+ui%$ ! n\m5al f ! ph5om5al ego4 ,! =m] he reg>d$ z an idea1 ! latt] z a reality 9 "t4 ,! di/9ction corresponds r\ghly to t betwe5 p]son & nature4 ,! ph5om5al ego is ! nature ( man4 ,x be>s ! brunt ( ! /ruggle ( life4 ,! n\m5al ego is ! transc5d5t p]sonality ( ! individual--an idea :i* pure reason necess>ily =ms & :i* practical reason e/abli%es4 ,?\gh ! ,kantian philosophy no long] c>ries conviction1 x is int]e/+ to see t ,kant felt & admitt$ a d\ble curr5t 9 man's be+4 ,he recognis$ t ! sup]ficial self is n ! true be+ ( ! man4 ,x is n necess>y1 h[ev]1 to g z f> z ,kant w5t4 ,we ne$ n ) him relegate ! core ( p]sonal be+ to ! realm ( idea4 ,grant$ t p]sonality is n "p ( our normal exp]i5ce z nature is1 !re are times :5 ! dep?s ( be+ are /irr$4 ,mom5ts ( crisis drive a man deep] ?an w & ?\ght & ev5 feel+1 & make him consci\s ( himself z a psy*ic unity1 p]man5t & ( inf9ite value4 ,p]sonality normally rema9s 9 ! recesses ( ! subconsci\s4 ,x is ! hidd5 basis ( life4 ,x is active1 ?\gh its activities are = ! mo/ "p und]gr\nd4 ,x does n1 h[ev]1 lie altoge!r outside ! k5 ( consci\sness4 ,x may be exp]i5c$2 x is exp]i5c$ :5 great emotion r5ds ! surface fabric ( ! man & discloses ! true self4 ,,human ,,p]sonality ,,& ,,human ,,nature ,:at is human p]sonality8 ,x is a psy*ic entity ^: mo/ important function is to unify ! p>ts ( a man's nature4 ,x is ! pr9ciple ( unity & ! in/rum5t ( unity4 ,a man's ?\ght1 w & feel+ are di/9ct & real entities4 ,8 intellig5ce takes v>i\s =ms f p]ception to ab/ract ?\ght2 x may be direct$ to outw>d ?+s1 to ?\ghts ( ?+s1 or to pure idea4 ,he wills _m ?+s1 & wills !m 9 diff]5t modes & ) v>y+ degrees ( int5sity4 ,a wide range ( feel+ is f\nd 9 him1 f physical to m5tal1 f organic to ideal feel+4 ,8 nature is trip>tite4 ,ea* "p admits ( v>iation 9 itself & 9 its int]action ) ! o!r p>ts4 ,ea* ( ! ?ree expresses ! man at ! mom5t4 ,no "o ( ! ?ree gives ! :ole acc\nt ( 8 be+4 ,nor d ! ?ree tak5 toge!r4 ,?\gh 8 nature is trip>tite ! man himself _c be resolv$ into compon5t p>ts4 ,he has 8 faculties & /ates1 b he is m ?an _! sum4 ,he may lose himself 9 ?\ght or activity1 or ab&on himself to feel+1 b :5 he is fulfill+ 8 true function1 :5 he is mo/ himself1 all p>ts ( 8 nature are conc5trat$ to a po9t4 ,p>tial activity ( ?\ght1 w1 or feel+ is !n replac$ by activity ( ! p]sonality4 ,p]sonality is ! syn!tic unity ( all p>ts ( a man's nature4 ,x has ! wond]ful p[] ( compress+ to a po9t a m$ley ( psy*ic elem5ts4 ,moods & memories1 p]ceptions & ideas1 wi%es & purposes1 x t5sions !m all up1 m]ges !m & expresses !m 9 *>act]i/ic acts repres5tative ( ! man4 ,p]sonality diff]s f nature also 9 respect ( relation to environm5t4 ,x is relatively indep5d5t ( circum/ances4 ,habit & education m\ld ! nature1 b if !y t\* ! p]son !y d s only indirectly4 ,! nature mu/ be deeply affect$ be=e a *ange 9 ! p]son is regi/]$4 ,p]sonality is n synonom\s ) inh]it$ disposition2 b x be>s a simil> relation to nature z inh]it$ disposition does to acquir$ habit4 ,x is to nature :at "* is to action4 ,x is to nature :at 9 ,weismann's !ory ! g]m plasm is to ! somatic cell4 ,*anges 9 x are m$iat$ by nature & are almo/ imp]ceptible 9 a life "t4 ,aga91 nature is ! sup]ficies ( ! s\l4 ,x is ! "p t comes 9 contact ) ! _w ( ?+s & p4 ,a man's nature is :at he is = o!r p2 :at he is 9 & = himself alone is p]sonality4 ,!re is a sub/ance or self-exi/5ce ( ! psy*ic /ates4 ,?\ght1 w & feel+ h all & ea* an ext]nal ref]5ce4 ,! int]nal ref]5ce ( ! :ole is ! core ( be+4 ,our p]ception ( p]sonality 9 o!r p is a subtle ?+4 ,9 ! ord9>y give & take ( life we are n aw>e ( x4 ,x is :5 we realise ! subject z a self-exi/5t unity t we recognise p]sonality4 ,we judge a man's nature by 8 ?\ght or w or feel+s z convey$ ?r\gh ! ord9>y *annels ( communication4 ,p]sonality is felt4 ,x is a magnetism t influ5ces1 b rema9s in>ticulate4 ,p]son & nature diff] also 9 respect ( relation to ! body4 ,! co-exi/5ce ( het]og5e\s natures 9 ! same body is a fact ( exp]i5ce4 ,diff]5t univ]ses ( ?\ght1 diff]5t levels ( w & feel+ c be lodg$ 9 "o organism4 ,! high] ! developm5t ( ! individual1 ! m cle>ly m>k$ is ! duality or plurality ( nature4 ,x is o!rwise ) p]sonality4 ,9 normal cases no two p]sonalities c t5ant ! "o body4 ,! unity ( ! organism is ! outw>d expression & gu>antee ( ! unity ( ! p]son4 ,!re are ( c\rse pa?ological cases :i* =m exceptions to ?is rule4 ,su* cases1 h[ev]1 only s]ve to emphasise ! di/9ction betwe5 p]son & nature4 ,9 cases ( dual p]sonality ! occupancy ( ! "o body is n simultane\s4 ,jekyll alt]nates ) ,hyde4 ,dual p]sonality is a totally diff]5t ph5om5on f duality ( nature4 ,duality ( nature is relatively sup]ficial4 ,9 dual p]sonality ! div]g5ce 9 m5tal & moral outlook is s radical t responsibility = ! acts ( ! "o entity _c atta* to ! o!r entity4 ,p]sonality !n is ! syn!tic pr9ciple 9 man's be+4 ,psy*ology reveals x z unify+ ! p>ts ( a man's s\l & weld+ into an indivisible :ole ! v>i\s elem5ts ( consci\s & subconsci\s exp]i5ce4 ,! /ud5t ( ,*ri/ology welcomes ?is acc\nt ( p]sonality1 b he requires m4 ,he seeks a p>allel = ! union ( two :ole & p]fect natures4 ,he dem&s "s reason = hold+ ! c5tral dogma ( ! inc>nation to be intelligible & probable4 ,! next /ep 9 ! argum5t accord+ly is to ask1 ,:y limit ! syn!tic p[] ( p]sonality8 ,if p]sonality c syn!sise p>ts ( a nature1 :y %\ld x n also syn!sise natures8 ,if human p]sonality c unify su* het]og5e\s psy*ic elem5ts z ?\ght1 w & feel+1 & pres5t !m z a h>moni\s :ole1 is x n cr$ible t div9e p]sonality %\ld c>ry ! syn!sis a /ep fur!r & h>monise 9 "o be+ ! ?\ghts1 wills & feel+s ( ,god & man8 ,! hypo/atic union ( natures 9 ,*ri/ is a ph5om5on n psy*ologically improbable1 & "o :i* c be p>allel$ f human exp]i5ce4 ,!re is 9 man :at is tantam\nt to a conjunction ( ! two natures4 ,man is r diphysite ?an monophysite4 ,we po9t$ out above ! ext5sive modifications t c be produc$ 9 a man's nature by environm5t4 ,!re is 9 him a deep] duality :i* we c only *>act]ise z an association ( div9e & human4 ,man is an inhabitant ( ! e>?1 ( e>?ly desc5t & f9ite de/9y2 yet ! div9e is n totally =eign to him4 ,he has hopes ( heav51 mom5ts ( supraconsci\sness1 at times vision1 resolve & emotion t are supra-normal4 ,! div9e is an elem5t 9 him4 ,x is m ?an an aspect ( 8 nature4 ,its influ5ce op]ates (t5 9 opposition to ! human elem5t4 ,he is1 z ,b]gson puts x1 at ! meet+-po9t ( ! upw>d & ! d[nw>d curr5ts4 ,he c "k ,god1 c d ! w ( ,god1 c be fill$ ) ! love ( ,god4 ,"h are ! ?ree factors ( 8 nature1 rais$ to a high] p[]4 ,8 exp]i5ce may lie & (t5 does lie on two planes4 ,he is d\ble liv$ 9 regions new4 ,9 apply+ ?is human analogy to ! ideal man caution is necess>y4 ,! duality ( natures is a fact 9 bo? cases1 b !re is "o ess5tial diff]5ce4 ,! p]sonal sub/ratum ( ! natures 9 "o case is human1 9 ! o!r case div9e4 ,9 man ! div9e elem5t is "p ( 8 nature1 b n "p ( 8 p]son4 ,! ego rema9s human ?r\gh all spiritual developm5t4 ,! be/ ( sa9ts is a sa9t at ! be/4 ,! second>y elem5t 9 him is a fact1 b x is "p ( 8 nature1 n ( 8 p]son4 ,x is o!rwise 9 ! case ( ,*ri/4 ,he came f ! ideal _w & return$ !re4 ,! backgr\nd ( 8 exp]i5ce 0 & is div9e4 ,! second>y elem5t 9 ,him 0 ! human1 ! prim>y ! div9e4 ,he %>$ man's exp]i5ce & %>$ x really1 b x did n =m "p ( ! core ( ,8 be+4 ,:5 ,he ?\ght or will$ or felt z a man1 x 0 a knsis1 a limit+ ( 8 natural mode ( self-expression4 ,div9e & human are bo? pres5t 9 ! exp]i5ce ( ,*ri/ & ( mank9d1 b ) ?is diff]5ce--man rises to ! div9e2 ,*ri/ condesc5d$ to ! human4 ,,value ,,( ,,b]gson',s ,,psy*ology ,,to ,,or?odox ,,*ri/ology ,p]son & nature are !n real & di/9ct psy*ic entities4 ,!y are real alike 9 ,god & man4 ,! di/9ction betwe5 !m is n artificial or v]bal2 x is p]haps elusive1 b x is g5u9e & capable ( pro( f exp]i5ce4 ,! syn!tic faculty ( p]sonality manife/s itself 9 unit+ )\t confus+1 fir/1 p>ts ( ! nature1 second1 entire natures4 ,^! !ses supply :at is requisite = an intellig5t appreciation ( ,*ri/ology4 ,)\t !m ,*ri/ology is a battle ( %ad[s2 ) !m x becomes a practical problem ( fir/ importance = religi\s m9ds4 ,! psy*ology :i* ju/ifies or?odox ,*ri/ology is t :i* proclaims ! int]p5etration ( psy*ic /ates1 & :i* di/+ui%es betwe5 ! surface /ates ( a relax$ consci\sness1 & ! deep-seat$ /ates :i* are ev] pres5t1 b ( :i* we are consci\s only at mom5ts ( t5sion4 ,! ca?olic m9d conceives ! p]son ( ,*ri/ z an et]nal self-exi/5t syn!tic unity t has comb9$ 9 an indissoluble union ! natures ( ,god & man4 ,human p>allels make intelligible ! co-exi/5ce ( ! two natures 9 ! "o p]son & ! "o body4 ,:at is normal 9 man is surely possible 9 ! ideal man4 ,h]etical ,*ri/ologies err 9 _! psy*ology4 ,9 ,ne/orian ,*ri/ology ,*ri/ is pres5t$ z a dual p]sonality1 an abnormal association 9 "o body ( two di/9ct self-exi/5t be+s4 ,?us a pa?ological case w\ld be elevat$ to ! rank ( mank9d's ideal4 ,! monophysite psy*ology plunges m5 into ! opposite error4 ,an undiscrim9at+ crav+ = unity among ! ph5om5a ( psy*ic life prev5ts any recognition ( ! dual "* ( exp]i5ce4 ,monophysitism is bl9d to ! diff]5ce betwe5 p]son & nature because x places all psy*ic exp]i5ces on ! "o level4 ,det]m9$ to f9d unity 9 its ideal1 x seeks an inappropriate unity1 ! ma!matical unity1 ! unity t excludes plurality4 ,to ! monophysite ! major "p ( ! gospels is a seal$ book1 because ! major "p ( ! facts !re record$ ab\t ,*ri/ c\ld n possibly h happ5$ to a "o-natur$ ,*ri/4 ,8 human k1 normal1 limit$1 progressive1 ,8 human w1 natural1 adequate to ! human1 inadequate to ! sup]human task1 8 human feel+s1 8 body consub/antial ) ours are to ! monophysite m]ely %ad[s or symbols or aspects ( some?+ great]4 ,!y are dw>f$ into no?+ness4 ,!y are lo/ 9 ! div9e omnisci5ce1 omnipot5ce & transc5d5t love4 ,,*apt] ,,vi ,,monophysitism ,,9 ,,! ,,pres5t ,,day ,to believe rightly ! inc>nation ( our ,"l ,jesus ,*ri/ is an ideal t ! ?\ghtful ,*ri/ian /rives to atta94 ,he expects to f9d ! solution ( high moral & speculative problems 9 t union ( div9e & human4 ,! "r fai? is n easily rea*$4 ,x is an elusive prize4 ,!re are conditions moral & intellectual atta*+ to its possession4 ,! moral conditions may take a lifetime to fulfil4 ,ev5 on its intellectual side fai? is a long process4 ,no sudd5 m5tal grasp ( ! :ole tru? c be atta9$4 ,x dawns on ! m9d gradually4 ,! discipl9e ( fai? 9 ! inc>nation consi/s 9 a gradual & labori\s advance f /age to /age4 ,! v>i\s /ages are half-tru?s or inadequate conceptions ( ,*ri/4 ,!y are objectifi$ 9 ! ,*ri/ological h]esies4 ,^! h]esies arrange !mselves 9 a sequ5ce s /rict & s logical t "o c\ld almo/ say t !y are d$ucible a priori f ! concept div9e-human4 ,c]ta9ly ! subjective fancies ( ! h]esi>*s d n provide ! :ole acc\nt4 ,!re is some?+ ( ! univ]sal 9 ^! h]esies4 ,!y are 9 ! ma9 curr5t ( religi\s ?\ght4 ,z ! *ief hi/oric sy/ems ( philosophy repeat !mselves 9 ea* g5]ation & 9 ! intellectual developm5t ( individual ?9k]s1 s d ! ,*ri/ological h]esies recur4 ,!re is consid]able tru? 9 ,hegel's cont5tions t ! developm5t ( a man's m9d is "o ) t ( ! g5]al consci\sness1 t ! individual reason is a m9iature ( ! univ]sal reason1 t 9 fact ! hi/ory ( a philosoph]'s ?9k+ is an ab/ract ( ! hi/ory ( philosophy4 ,! same holds good 9 ! field ( religi\s ?\ght4 ,)\t mu* artificiality1 )\t =c+ ! facts1 a rational s*eme ( ! ,*ri/ological h]esies might be drawn up4 ,!y might be pictorially repres5t$ z ! rungs ( a ladd]1 :i* ! tru?-seek+ m9d scales rung by rung1 paus+ at ! l[] phases ( ,*ri/ological ?\ght1 & !n resum+ ! asc5t till ! highe/ tru? is atta9$4 ,! in/rum5t ( ?\ght is mu* ! same 9 all c5turies2 ! objects ( ?\ght v>y v little2 s x is intelligible t ! products ( speculative & religi\s ?\ght %\ld rema9 ! same to-day z 9 ! fif? c5tury4 ,,! ,,exi/5ce ,,( ,,mod]n ,,monophysitism ,is !re su* a ?+ z mod]n monophysitism8 ,to ?is "q ! prec$+ p>agraph supplies ! answ]1 ,!re mu/ be4 ,h]etical t5d5cies w be f\nd 9 ! ,*ri/ian community 9 e g5]ation1 & ! religi\s ?\ght ( individual ,*ri/ians w pass ?r\gh h]etical phases4 ,su* h]esy is r an intellectual ?an a moral fault2 b ! possibility ( be+ ! heirs1 )\t kn[+ x1 ( ! op9ions ( ,ne/orius & ,euty*es ?r[s on ?9k]s to-day ! responsibility ( exam9+ _! ,*ri/ological beliefs & ( te/+ !m by ! canon ( or?odoxy4 ,n a few lead]s ( religi\s ?\ght1 9 int5tion or?odox1 9 fact rema9 monophysites1 ?r\gh inability to analyse _! beliefs or ?r\gh a false s5se ( security1 f\nd$ on ! op9ion t ! age ( h]esy is pa/4 ,x is commonly suppos$ t belief 9 ! deity ( ,*ri/ con/itutes ,*ri/ianity4 ,t supposition is wrong4 ,arius 0 n ! only h]esi>*4 ,to transc5d ! ,arian /&po9t is only ! fir/ /ep 9 ! long discipl9e ( fai?4 ,!re are o!r h]esies1 o!r half-tru?s sc>cely less p]nici\s ?an ! ,arian4 ,! recognition ( ,*ri/ z ,god repres5ts a great intellectual & moral advance1 & is ! fir/ ess5tial /ep 9 religion2 b to re/ cont5t ) ! tak+ ( t /ep is to rema9 on ! l[e/ rung ( ! ladd] ( fai?4 ,x is little use to =m a l(ty conception ( ,*ri/1 if 9 do+ s we insulate ,him f ! _w ( ?+s & s\ls4 ,t is :at monophysitism does1 & because disguis$ monophysitism is preval5t 9 ! *ur* to-day1 ,*ri/ianity's grip is weak & ! fire ( devotion l[4 ,we may picture fai? z a battlefield4 ,d\bt is ! enemy entr5*$ 9 dep?4 ,arianism holds ! fir/ l9e ( tr5*es4 ,e*elon$ beh9d ,arianism are ! o!r h]esies 9 a network ( =tifi$ r$\bts1 /rong po9ts & support tr5*es4 ,! *ur* militant mu/ make ! fur!/ l9e h] objective4 ,if h] advance /ays at an int]m$iate po9t1 %e is expos$ to cross-fire f ! support tr5*es ( ! subsidi>y h]esies4 ,! gr\nd ga9$ by ! fir/ assault proves unt5able4 ,! position won c only be secur$ by pu%+ home ! attack to ! f9al objective & consolidat+ h] l9e !re 9 ! might ( full ca?olic doctr9e4 ,a ?or\gh & sy/ematic advance ( ?is sort 0 made by ! or?odox ,*ri/ologians ( ! fif? c5tury4 ,! campaign 0 f\ght & won !n4 ,x has1 h[ev]1 to be f\ght anew 9 ea* g5]ation & 9 ! exp]i5ce ( individual ?9k]s4 ,monophysitism is commonly reg>d$ z a vag>y ( ori5tal ?\ght1 kill$ once & = all by a *ur* c\ncil 9 ! fif? c5tury4 ,t is a sup]ficial view4 ,monophysitism is a hydra gr[?1 & no ,h]cules c be f\nd to ext]m9ate x4 ,x reappe>s 9 ea* succe$+ age1 9 ,we/ z well z ,ea/4 ,! /ructure ( ! human intellect is su* t1 :5ev] m5 beg9 to inve/igate ! be+ ( ,*ri/1 ! t5d5cy to reg>d ,him z "o-natur$ is pres5t4 ,! *ur* ( ! fif? c5tury expos$ t doctr9e2 x 0 beyond h] p[] to kill x4 ,,reasons ,,= ,,! ,,preval5ce ,,( ,,monophysitism ,monophysitism is 9 our mid/ undetect$ to-day4 ,x is n h>d to acc\nt = its preval5ce4 ,! cl]gy are = ! mo/ "p unable to exp\nd ,*ri/ology1 & ! laity are impati5t ( exposition4 ,any?+ sav\r+ ( precise !ology is at a disc\nt4 ,s pulpit & pew conspire to fo/] ! gr[? ( ! t>es4 ,! ,a?anasian cre$ is 9 disrepute1 & its /atem5t ( dogmatic ,*ri/ology is involv$ 9 ! discr$it atta*+ to ! damnatory clauses4 ,! cl]gy are p]haps r glad to leave ! subject alone4 ,!y "k x is a difficult subject1 & !y are afraid ( burn+ _! f+]s4 ,! laity r>ely he> any ref]5ce to ! two natures ( ,*ri/4 ,if !y d1 !y are n int]e/$2 !y d n ?9k t ! "q makes any diff]5ce to fai? or practice4 ,! :ole ext5t ( ! ,*ri/ological k possess$ by ! av]age *ur*man is compris$ 9 ! =mula1 ,*ri/ is ,god & man4 ,he _c apply ! =mula nor reconcile x ) common s5se4 ,he occasionally he>s f ! pulpit ! phrase ,god-man2 b x is a m]e phrase to him2 x is n translat$ = him into a language t he c und]/&4 ,s he regi/]s ! doctr9e m5tally z an imp5etrable my/]y & gives x no fur!r att5tion1 or p]haps turns away 9 disgu/ f ! sy/em ^: c5tral figure is s un9telligibly pres5t$ by its au?oris$ expon5ts4 ,! b>e /atem5t t ,*ri/ is ,god & man1 ?\gh true1 is n adequate4 ,x c>ries no conviction to ?9k+ m9ds to-day4 ,! full def9ition ( ! c\ncil ( ,*alc$on %\ld be publi%$ broadca/1 & s /udi$ by !ologians 9 ! light ( mod]n psy*ology t !y c pres5t x z a reasonable dogma1 intelligible to-day & t\*+ mod]n life4 ,9 ! abs5ce ( su* tea*+ ! spread ( false1 unbalanc$ or inadequate conceptions ( :at ,*ri/ 0 & ( :at ,he is is inevitable4 ,our conc]n "h is to exhibit ^? ( a monophysite "*4 ,monophysite t5d5cies ( ! pres5t day may be gr\p$ accord+ z !y affect ,*ri/'s be+ or ,8 "w or ,*ri/ian practice4 ,we propose to take !m 9 t ord]4 ,,mod]n ,,pres5tations ,,( ,,*ri/ ,,esot]ic ,,& ,,defici5t ,,9 ,,p]sonal ,,appeal ,monophysitism 9 respect ( ,*ri/'s be+ %[s itself to-day 9 negative r ?an positive ways4 ,to its subtle influ5ce is traceable ! capital defect ( mod]n pres5tations ( ,*ri/1 namely1 t !y make no appeal to ! outsid]4 ,*ri/ is proclaim$ z ! solution ( moral1 social & indu/rial problems4 ,z a rule 9 su* cases ! "n ,*ri/ is us$ z a synonym = ,*ri/ian pr9ciples4 ,su* appeals are address$ to ! head2 !y d n t\* ! he>t & fire ! imag9ation2 !y d n k9dle t p]sonal devotion to ! ,man ,*ri/ ,jesus :i* has always be5 ! dynamic ( ! fai?4 ,! hi/oric ,*ri/ is n pres5t$ 9 a way t w\ld appeal to ! unconv9c$4 ,*ri/ian tea*+ is becom+ m & m esot]ic4 ,9 ! language ( ,*ri/ology1 a diphysite ,*ri/ is n prea*$4 ,8 human nature is kept 9 ! backgr\nd4 ,x is n portray$ 9 arre/+ col\rs4 ,if ! apo/les & apo/olic m5 _h prea*$ ! imp]sonal r$eem] ( mod]n religi\s ?\ght1 !y w\ld nev] h won ! _w = ,*ri/4 ,_! imag9ations & lives 7 fir$ by contact ) a ,man ( fle% & blood4 ,s !y pres5t$ a ,*ri/ ^: true humanity appeal$ to ,8 fell[-m54 ,!y %[$ ! gospel picture to an unbeliev+ _w1 & ! _w respond$ to its appeal4 ,x is n easy to bridge ! c5turies & rega9 ! apo/les' /&po9t1 b until x is done ! *ur*'s message w lack inspiration4 ,! phrase ! hi/oric ,*ri/ is commonly us$1 z if x cov]$ ! :ole gr\nd4 ,x is c]ta9ly s]viceable z a prote/ aga9/ a b>e logos !ory ( ! inc>nation1 b 9 itself x is n adequate4 ,:at requires emphasis is ! humanity ( ! hi/oric ,*ri/4 ,_m ,*ri/ian tea*]s purposely )hold ?is emphasis f fe> ( play+ into ! h&s ( ,arians & ,ne/orians4 ,no d\bt if press$ !y w\ld give intellectual ass5t to ! dogma ( ! two natures1 b !y %r9k f foll[+ x out to its consequ5ces4 ,!re is a widespread feel+ t x is irrev]5t to dwell on ! fact t ,*ri/ 0 a real man4 ,a firm grasp ( ca?olic ,*ri/ology 9 its entirety is ! cure = ?is squeami%ness4 ,to obscure ! fact ( ,8 ,manhood is n ! true reply to a d5ial ( ,8 ,deity4 ,a true pres5tation ( ,*ri/ mu/ give full weight to ! facts t ,he _h a human body1 human m9d1 human feel+s & human w1 t ,8 body 0 9 space normally subject to physical law1 t ,8 consci\sness & subconsci\sness con=m$ to psy*ic law4 ,:]ev] a d5ial ( ^! facts is f\nd1 !re is monophysitism4 ,:]ev] !y are obscur$ or neglect$1 !re are monophysite t5d5cies4 ,,indiff]5ce ,,to ,,*ri/',s ,,suff]+s--,a ,,classical ,,comp>ison ,failure to appreciate ! real humanity ( ,*ri/'s life results 9 comp>ative indiff]5ce to ! trag$y ( ,8 dea?4 ,monophysitism 9 und]m9+ belief 9 ! reality ( ,*ri/'s manhood is weak5+ sympa?y ) ,8 suff]+s4 ,calv>y l ,be?lehem has lo/ mu* ( its appeal4 ,a classical comp>ison w illu/rate ?is fact4 ,plato's acc\nt ( ,socrates' la/ h\r 9 ! prison & ( 8 dr9k+ ! hemlock is1 ,i imag9e1 to _m educat$ m5 f> m mov+ ?an ! /ory ( ! ,passion & ,dea? ( ,*ri/4 ,!re is a curi\s simil>ity 9 ! two trag$ies t invites att5tion & comp>ison4 ,bo? suff]]s 7 h]oes & moral re=m]s1 ! victims ( mi/ak5 zeal on ! "p ( religi\s au?ority4 ,socrates di$ 9 a ripe age ) 8 life "w accompli%$4 ,jesus 0 cut (f 9 ,8 prime4 ,socrates' la/ h\rs 7 tranquil & 8 pass+ quick & easy4 ,jesus aft] %ame & torture di$ a l+]+ dea?4 ,! dy/hanasia ( ,jesus %\ld1 "o w\ld op9e1 make a /rong] appeal to m5's sympa?ies ?an does ! eu?anasia ( ,socrates4 ,yet on ! :ole ! rev]se is ! case4 ,! diff]5ce 9 ! respective /yles ( ! two n>ratives does n give ! :ole explanation4 ,x is true t ! ,pha$o is a "w ( f9e art :ile ! gospel /ory is a pla9 /atem5t ( fact4 ,! reason1 h[ev]1 = ! diff]5ce 9 appeal goes deep] ?an lit]>y /yle4 ,! read] ( ! ,pha$o puts himself into ! place ( ,socrates & suff]s ) him4 ,z we read ! ,passion ( ,*ri/ !re rises a b>ri] betwe5 u & ! div9e suff]]4 ,unconsci\sly we say to ourselves1 ,*ri/ suff]$1 ( c\rse1 b ,he did n suff] z we %\ld h suff]$ 9 ,8 place4 ,8 7 n ! real suff]+s ( a real man4 ,if ! passion ( ,*ri/ & t ( ,socrates 7 weigh$ 9 ! same balances1 !re w\ld be less indiff]5ce to-day to ! gospel /ory4 ,7 ,*ri/ ! ,man realis$ z su*1 visualis$1 z o!r great m5 ( hi/ory are visualis$1 among 8 foll[]s1 ! h]o wor%ip t inspir$ ! e>ly *ur* w\ld revive4 ,:at makes ,*ri/ians indiff]5t to ,*ri/'s suff]+s is n ! lapse ( c5turies nor weakness ( imag9ation b a subconsci\s monophysitism4 ,!re is to mo/ m9ds a haze ( unreality ov]hang+ ! acc\nts ( ,8 life & dea?4 ,!y =get t ,he %>$ human exp]i5ce to ! full4 ,!y ?9k ( ,him z do+ ?+s rhids l ! ,hom]ic gods4 ,9 po9t ( fact1 ,8 great results 7 a*iev$ only aft] long labori\s ex]tion4 ,8 0 a life ( /r5u\s human activity1 physical & m5tal4 ,ev5 ,8 miracles 7 accompani$ by a physical ?rob ( sympa?y2 virtue w5t out ( ,him4 ,r$emption made x necess>y4 ,en?usia/ic devotion to a p]son mu/ be gr\nd$ 9 community ( exp]i5ce4 ,x is ! human t\*es 9 ! drama ( ,*ri/'s life t make ! mo/ p[]ful appeal to mank9d4 ,yet ! human elem5t is obscur$1 z a rule1 9 mod]n pres5tations ( ! gospel4 ,= spiritual m9ds x is comp>atively easy to appreh5d a div9e ,*ri/4 ,to appreh5d a human ,*ri/ makes a l>g] call on _! imag9ation & _! sympa?y4 ,spiritual m5 are naturally monophysite 9 _! ?9k+4 ,!y %r9k f ! m5tal ef=t t diphysitism dem&s4 ,_! att5tion is focuss$ on ,*ri/'s sup]iority to human limitations4 ,!y sc>cely see ! miracle ( ! human1 & ?us !y miss ! import ( ! div9e miracle4 ,9 ! atmosph]e ( monophysitism my/icism ?rives1 b devotion decays4 ,we may in/ance ! almo/ total disappe>ance ( ! crusad+ _s4 ,! ,*ri/ to :om our ?\ghts usually turn is an omnipres5t ideal ) no hi/orical or local associations4 ,8 bir?-place & ,8 c\ntry evoke only a lukew>m s5tim5t4 ,! *ur*'s ye> is neglect$4 ,! hi/orical facts ( ,*ri/'s life are (t5 reg>d$ z ( only m9or importance4 ,piety us$ to consi/ 9 p]sonal loyalty to ! ,f\nd] ( a univ]sal religion2 x is n[ consid]$ synonym\s ) ob$i5ce to ! gold5 rule4 ,,to ,,attribute ,,omnisci5ce ,,to ,,*ri/',s ,,human ,,nature ,,is ,,monophysitism ,)9 rec5t times ! "q z to ! limitation ( ,*ri/'s k 0 hotly debat$4 ,t debate %[$ h[ mu* unc]ta9ty on ,*ri/ological que/ions exi/s & h[ /rong monophysite op9ion /ill is4 ,9 spite ( ,*ri/'s own dicta1 9 spite ( ! dogma ( two natures1 d5ial ( ! limitation 0 widespread & p]si/5t4 ,to _m dev\t m9ds x seems impi\s to speak ( ,*ri/'s ignorance4 ,?is is a case 9 :i* ! ,*alc$onian def9ition is an invaluable guide4 ,if "o br+s to an exam9ation ( ,*ri/'s nature ! preconceiv$ notion ( ,8 omnisci5ce1 ! doctr9e ( ! limitation ( ,8 k seems an outrage on belief2 b if "o approa*es ! "q ) ! or?odox =mula 9 m9d1 "o is prep>$ to f9d t ,8 cognitive faculties 7 p]fectly human & humanly p]fect4 ,s we f9d x4 ,8 k & ,8 faculties ( k on ! l[] plane ( ,8 exp]i5ce 7 ess5tially ! same z ours4 ,he ?\ght 9 our categories4 ,he us$ our organon1 p]fect ( its k9d1 b /ill a human organon4 ,z man1 inevitably1 ,he _h ?\ghts uncognis$2 & su* a m5tal /ate we call ignorance4 ,8 m9d pass$ ?r\gh /ages ( developm5t z ours does4 ,education wid5$ ,8 horizon1 /r5g!n$ ,8 faculties1 & increas$ ,8 k4 ,advance 9 k implies a prior /ate ( relative ignorance4 ,! ^w ignorance z appli$ to ,*ri/ s\nds v t]rible2 b inve/igation ( its mean+ robs x ( its t]rors4 ,we use ! ^w 9 two s5ses4 ,on ! "o h& x may mean ! abs5ce ( a ?\ght1 its absolute non-pres5ce 9 consci\sness4 ,on ! o!r x may mean ?\ght unrelat$ to exp]i5ce1 "o ^: implications are n or _c be fully d$uc$1 9 fact1 ! incomplete cognition ( an idea4 ,9 nei!r case does x involve imp]fection 9 ! in/rum5t or moral fault4 ,on ! contr>y ignorance is a m>k ( ! normal 9 cognition4 ,if ignorance & limitation ( k 7 n f\nd 9 ,*ri/1 we %\ld be =c$ to agree ) ,apoll9>is t ! div9e ,logos _h sup]s$$ ,8 human intellect4 ,ignorance 9 s f> z x is a positive attribute is f> f be+ a m>k ( imp]fection4 ,x is a true p>adox t ignorance l oblivisc5ce =ms "p ( ! process ( human cognis+4 ,probably 9 ! tru? ( ?+s memory is ( ! ess5ce ( m9d4 ,?\ghts naturally & spontane\sly reproduce !mselves4 ,! pa/ ( exp]i5ce t5ds automatically to c>ry =w>d into ! pres5t4 ,! function ( ! bra9 !n1 or ( a m5tal faculty intimately co-op]at+ ) ! bra9 is to discrim9ate1 to sift & select1 to prolong into pres5t consci\sness :at is ( importance = action & to relegate ! irrelevant to p>tial or total oblivion4 ,f ?is psy*ological /&po9t ignorance & oblivisc5ce are se5 to be a*ievem5ts ( ! intellect4 ,! pres5ce ( all facts 9 a human consci\sness is un?9kable4 ,if x 7 possible1 x w\ld p>alyse action4 ,if we exempt ,*ri/ f ! law ( ignorance & oblivisc5ce1 we ipso facto dehumanise 8 cognition4 ,:5 we say t ,jesus 0 ignorant ( mu* sci5tific tru?1 or t 8 presci5ce 0 limit$1 we d n compromise ,8 dignity4 ,we simply ass]t ! naturalness ( ,8 intellect & ! true humanity ( t elem5t ( ,8 nature4 ,to d o!rwise1 to claim omnisci5ce = ,8 human intellect is gross monophysitism4 ,8 k 0 deep]1 sur]1 m p5etrat+ ?an ours1 because ! light ( ,8 div9e intuition /ream$ ?r\gh ! veil ( s5se & illum9$ ! l[] phases ( intellig5ce4 ,?is is an in/ance ( ! communicatio idiomatum4 ,! prop]ties ( ! two natures act & react ^u "o ano!r4 ,b we mu/ make ! di/9ction ( natures our />t+-po9t1 or fusion w take place4 ,!re mu/ be idiomata fir/1 or ! communicatio is mean+less4 ,,! ,,pres5t ,,exi/5ce ,,( ,,*ri/',s ,,human ,,nature ,! view tak5 ( ! ,*ri/ ( ! pa/ necess>ily affects belief 9 ! ,*ri/ ( ! pres5t4 ,x is sc>cely possible to realise ! pres5t exi/5ce ( a human ,*ri/1 unless ! fact ( ,8 actual human exi/5ce 9 ! fir/ c5tury ( our era be grasp$4 ,if ,he _h b "o nature on e>?1 ,he has b "o nature n[ 9 heav54 ,if ! hi/oric ,*ri/ 0 monophysite1 s also is ! ,*ri/ to :om we pray4 ,9 ?is consequ5ce consi/s ! s]i\sness ( mod]n monophysitism4 ,! pres5t reality ( ,8 human nature is to-day ev5 among ,8 foll[]s d\bt$1 obscur$1 or =gott54 ,*ri/ is to _m spiritual m9ds m]ely an ideal p]sonality1 a summ>y ( _! own e?ical ideals4 ,!y p]haps reg>d ,him z a disembodi$ _s or my/]i\s influ5ce4 ,!y r>ely atta9 ! ca?olic /&po9t & see ! human nature z a psy*ic entity actually exi/5t to-day4 ,at any rate ! doctr9e is n ?\ght out to its consequ5ces4 ,! p]petual int]cession is1 x is fe>$1 little m ?an a phrase4 ,t ,*ri/ z man /ill int]c$es = m5 is a v]ity n und]/ood & only half appreciat$4 ,yet ! (ficial doctr9e ( or?odoxy tea*es t !re is a full & true cont9uity ( exi/5ce betwe5 ! ,*ri/ ( ,galilee & ! ,*ri/ to :om we pray4 ,! ,*ur* tea*es t !re is some:]e1 9 "s transc5d5t =m ( exi/5ce1 a be+ ) p]fect human m9d1 ^: w 9 /r5g? & scope is p]fectly proportion$ to ,8 k1 ^: feel+s are 9 p]fect mutual h>mony1 ^: psy*ic nature f9ds outw>d expression 9 a glorifi$ body2 t ?is p]fect be+ once walk$ ?is e>?1 & yet _h & has ! gr\nd ( ,8 be+ 9 a div9e p]sonality4 ,su* a ,*ri/ ! lat5t monophysitism ( our ?9k+ hides f our view4 ,,! ,,doctr9e ,,( ,,subjective ,,r$emption ,,due ,,to ,,monophysitism ,! doctr9es ( ,*ri/'s p]son & ( ,8 "w are intimately associat$4 ,:at ,he did dep5d$ on :at ,he 04 ,*ri/ology & ,sot]iology act & react ^u ea* o!r4 ,if ,*ri/ology is crippl$1 ,sot]iology goes lame4 ,*ri/ takes ,8 /& 9 ! c5tre ( ! cosmic process 9 virtue ( ,8 unique be+4 ,9 t ,he unites deity & humanity 9 ,8 own p]son1 ,he br\ght r$emption )9 ! rea* ( mank9d4 ,8 r$emption ( humanity 0 z def9ite a fact z ,8 assumption ( human nature4 ,bo? to ! ,*ri/ian are objective hi/orical facts2 if ei!r ( !m falls to ! gr\nd1 s does ! o!r2 & ) t collapse goes ! purpose ( creation & humanity's hope4 ,a docetic int]pretation ( ! human nature entails a docetic view ( r$emption4 ,monophysitism1 z we h se51 ca/s d\bts ^u ! reality ( ! suff]+s & humanity ( ,*ri/2 9 s do+ x compromises ! "w ,he accompli%$4 ,atonem5t ceases to be a cosmic transaction complet$ on ,calv>y1 & becomes a subjective process4 ,r$emption is made into an attitude1 or r a *ange ( attitude1 on ! "p ( ! individual4 ,t ,*ri/ wr\ght a p[] & hope = man :i* man c\ld n a*ieve = himself is n a famili> doctr9e to-day4 ,pa91 n s91 is ! great mod]n problem4 ,! ,cross is made to /& = sympa?y1 n = satisfaction4 ,salvation1 a*iev$ at a def9ite mom5t ( hi/ory & conf]r$ on believ]s ( subsequ5t g5]ations1 re/s = its f\ndations on ! objective assumption ( human nature by a div9e p]son4 ,if ! f\ndations be und]m9$1 z monophysitism und]m9es !m1 ! sup]/ructure crumbles4 ,r$emption becomes improvem5t by ef=t & self-help1 or a con/ant endeav\r aft] a private ideal ( conduct4 ,,monophysitism ,,limits ,,! ,,scope ,,( ,,r$emption ,monophysitism %[s itself also 9 ! mod]n t5d5cy to n>r[ ! scope ( r$emption4 ,p>tial salvation is (f]$ z a sub/itute = ! salvation ( ! entire man4 ,?is t5d5cy is a natural result ( n>r[+ ! import ( ! inc>nation4 ,x runs c\nt] to or?odox ,*ri/ology & ! d]ivate doctr9es4 ,a div9e economy is traceable 9 ,god's deal+s ) m52 !re is no?+ purposeless1 no?+ otiose 9 ,god's disp5sation4 ,! ,*ur*'s inv>iable answ] to ! ,apoll9>ians 0 gr\nd$ 9 belief 9 ?is economy4 ,%e argu$ t ,*ri/ c\ld n r$eem :at ,he did n assume1 &1 conv]sely1 t :at ,he assum$ ,he r$eem$4 ,he assum$ human nature 9 its entirety1 ?\ght1 w1 feel+ & body2 !re=e n "o ( ^? elem5ts ( human nature lies outside ! scope ( r$emption4 ,monophysitism excludes "s or all ( ^? elem5ts f ! be+ ( ! inc>nate ,*ri/1 & by s do+ deprives ! correspond+ elem5ts 9 man's nature ( _! rightful %>e 9 ! b5efit ( r$emption4 ,! feel+ t "s p>ts ( human nature are m fitt$ to survive ?an o!rs is wide-spread to-day4 ,x is f\nd )9 z well z )\t ! ,*ur*4 ,we con/antly read ( ! survival factor4 ,! t]m implies ! belief t at dea? "p ( ! man's nature survives & "p p]i%es4 ,!re is1 h[ev]1 no g5]al agreem5t z to :i* "p con/itutes ! survival factor4 ,! intellectuali/ p9s 8 fai? to ! immortality ( ! reason4 ,he is cont5t to let dea? deprive him ( ev]y?+ except ! logical faculty4 ,= ! ae/hete beauty alone is et]nal1 & 8 hope = ! future lies 9 ! cont9uance ( 8 ae/hetic s5se4 ,! mat]iali/ sees p]man5ce only 9 ! inde/ructibility ( ! ultimate physical con/itu5ts ( 8 body4 ,! epig5esis ( a spiritual body lies outside 8 horizon4 ,! volitioni/ f9ds all ! value ( life 9 ! moral nature4 ,= him ! good w p]si/s :5 all else is resolv$ into no?+ness4 ,"* alone1 he says1 survives ! %ock ( dea?4 ,all ^! limit$ views ( survival are symptoms ( monophysite ways ( ?9k+4 ,! ,*ri/ian1 on ! contr>y1 holds t :at is r$eem$ eo ipso survives4 ,:atev] else is involv$ 9 r$emption p]si/5ce c]ta9ly is includ$4 ,monophysitism /&s = a p>tial r$emption2 b to ! or?odox :o believe t ,*ri/ assum$ human nature 9 its entirety1 ea* "p & ! :ole are ( inf9ite value4 ,he holds t ! /r5g!n+1 purify+1 & p]fect+ t salvation br+s apply to ! psy*ic & ! physical natures1 t no "p is exempt1 t nei!r intellect nor w nor feel+ ceases ) dea?1 t ! range ( reason w be increas$1 & its op]ation made m sure1 t l(ty & su/a9$ endeav\r w replace ! transi5t en]gy ( ! e>?ly w1 t feel+ w be enhanc$1 h>monis$1 & purifi$1 t a spiritual body cont9u\s ) ! body ( ! fle% w express man's heav5ly exp]i5ce4 ,^! high f>-rea*+ hopes re/ on ! doctr9es ( ca?olic ,*ri/ology4 ,*ri/ assum$ our nature complete 9 body & psy*ic p>ts4 ,he did s ) a purpose1 & t purpose c\ld be none o!r ?an ! r$emption ( ! body & ( all ! psy*ic elem5ts4 ,to ! my/ic1 body & human activities may seem only transi5t & unwor?y ( a place 9 heav54 ,su* is false spirituality4 ,x is contr>y to ! t5or ( ca?olic tea*+4 ,! inc>nation br\ght div9e & human toge!r on e>?4 ,! resurrection fix$ _! union4 ,! asc5sion gave humanity an et]nal place among et]nal ?+s4 ,,monophysitism ,,%[n ,,9 ,,! ,,mod]n ,,t5d5cy ,,to ,,make ,,! ,,dea? ,,( ,,*ri/ ,a ,,second>y ,,factor ,,9 ,,! ,,s*eme ,,( ,,r$emption ,we h se5 above t monophysitism discr$its ! reality ( ,*ri/'s suff]+s4 ,dogmatic reasons ap>t1 ! monophysite is motiv$ by a repugnance to physical pa9 & by a wi% to exclude x f ! exp]i5ce ( ! human ideal4 ,to ?is motive we c trace ! mod]n t5d5cy to transf] ! doctr9al c5tre ( gravity f ! ,passion to ! inc>nation4 ,! ,passion & ,dea? us$ to occupy ! fir/ place 9 ! ?\ghts ( ,*ri/ians & =m$ ! f\ndation = all !ories ( atonem5t4 ,! inc>nation 0 reg>d$ z1 = ! purposes ( dogma1 subsidi>y4 ,)9 rec5t times ! position has be5 rev]s$4 ,! ma9 /ress falls n[ on ! inc>nation4 ,! ,passion seems ( second>y importance1 if1 z mod]n !ology (t5 tea*es1 all purposes ( r$emption 7 secur$ prior to x4 ,9 ?us *ang+ ! v5ue ( r$emption mod]n !ology is wrong4 ,! mi/ake is prompt$ l>gely1 s x seems to ! writ]1 by monophysitism lat5t 9 mod]n religi\s ?\ght2 at any rate /rict adh]5ce to ! ca?olic doctr9e ( two natures w\ld h prev5t$ x4 ,! human nature t ,*ri/ assum$ _h to be p]fect$ ?r\gh suff]+2 o!rwise x c\ld n atta9 t univ]sality & repres5tative "* :i* enabl$ x to become ! m$ium ( univ]sal salvation4 ,if x _h be5 en\gh = ! div9e _s to m+le ) m51 to %[ !m a patt]n life1 & to t\* !m to high] ?+s1 an app>ition w\ld h be5 adequate1 & no community ( suff]+ w\ld h be5 necess>y4 ,s9ce ,*ri/ n only appe>$ z man1 b exp]i5c$ 9 ,8 fle% all man's exp]i5ces1 dea? :i* is ! climax ( human exp]i5ce fell to ,8 lot & set ! seal to ! div9e ent]prise4 ,s9ce ,he :o di$ 0 ! fle% & blood embodim5t ( ! cosmic relation4 ,8 dea? has cosmic significance4 ,! doctr9al edifice 9 :i* ,calv>y is ( ornam5tal & n ( /ructural value has monophysitism = its f\ndation4 ,,hi/orical ,,"* ,,( ,,*ri/ianity ,,obscur$ ,*ri/'s mission is misund]/ood to-day z well z ,8 cosmic "w4 ,9 c]ta9 religi\s qu>t]s :]e zeal is n balanc$ by le>n+1 ,8 mission z ! f\nd] ( a religi\s society is =gott54 ,to ^? :o are defici5t 9 hi/oric s5se ! cont9uity ( ! ,*ur* d[n ! c5turies seems unimportant1 & in/itutional religion a h9drance r ?an a help to ! spiritual life ( ! individual ,*ri/ian4 ,pietism ( ?is k9d has always be5 pres5t 9 ! *ur*2 to-day x is preval5t4 ,x nom9ally associates its piety ) ! hi/oric ,*ri/1 b actually x wor%ips an ideal con/ruct$ by its own e?ical imag9ation4 ,su* pieti/s spiritualise ! fai?4 ,! facts ( ! hi/oric cre$ are to !m little m ?an symbols ( religi\s tru?4 ,spiritual resurrection1 spiritual asc5sion are ! only miracles = !m4 ,?is t5d5cy to spiritualise ev]y?+ is a phase ( monophysitism4 ,x results f los+ sight ( ! p]son ( ! hi/oric ,*ri/1 & resolv+ ,8 assumption ( human nature into ! assumption ( a title4 ,,*ri/ology ,a ,,det]m9ant ,,( ,,sacram5tal ,,?\ght ,errors 9 sacram5tal tea*+ necess>ily accompany misconceptions ( ! p]son ( ,*ri/4 ,! inc>nation is a cosmic sacram5t1 ! meet+-po9t ( div9e & human1 & ! sacram5ts ( ! *ur* are types ( ! va/] my/]y4 ,9 bo? type & antitype x is all important to give due weight to div9e & human1 & n to exalt "o elem5t at ! exp5se ( ! o!r4 ,^? :o und]value ! human nature ( ,*ri/ are dispos$ to und]value ! outw>d sign 9 ! sacram5ts4 ,n appreciat+ ! hypo/atic union ( div9e ) human1 !y misund]/& ! sacram5tal union ( ! same elem5ts4 ,bl9d to ! significance ( ,*ri/'s humanity 9 ! economy ( r$emption1 !y fail to see h[ matt] c be ! *annel ( sacram5tal grace4 ,yet ! discipl9e ( fai? is ! same 9 bo? cases4 ,! ,*ri/ian ent]prise is n m]ely to believe 9 ! div9e1 b to believe 9 ! div9e manife/$ 9 ! human4 ,!re are two div]g5t1 almo/ oppos+1 s*ools ( sacram5tal tea*+1 bo? ( :i* h inh]it$ ! _s ( monophysitism4 ,bo? are in/ances ( sacram5tal monism4 ,fir/1 !re are ^? :o id5tify ! outw>d signs & ! inw>d grace2 second1 ^? to :om ! inw>d grace is ev]y?+ & ! outw>d sign no?+4 ,bo? s*ools ( ?\ght de/roy ! nature ( a sacram5t4 ,! radical error ( bo? consi/s 9 und]valu+ ! human & mat]ial4 ,9 ! fir/ case ! error takes ! =m ( ! transub/antiation doctr9e1 :i* is exactly p>allel to ! extreme =m ( ,euty*ianism4 ,accord+ to ,euty*es1 ! human nature ( ,*ri/ 0 absorb$ into ! div9e & lo/ !re2 ! tru? ( ,8 be+ 0 ! div9e p]sonality2 ! human elem5t 0 only an appe>ance4 ,simil>ly ! transub/antiation !ory conceives ! mutation ( ! sub/ance ( ! mat]ial elem5ts & ! loss ( _! prop] nature2 ! appe>ance ( reality t ! accid5ts possess is an illusion ( ! s5ses4 ,we may note 9 pass+ t ! opposite error to transub/antiation f9ds its ,*ri/ological p>allel 9 ,ne/orianism4 ,soc9ianism :i* sep>ates symbol f sacram5tal grace is sacram5tal dualism1 z ,ne/orianism is ,*ri/ological dualism4 ,bo? ab&on a vital unity ( div9e & human4 ,! pieti/ic or my/ical view ( ! sacram5ts does s too1 b 9 a diff]5t way4 ,?is second =m ( sacram5tal monism has mu* 9 common ) ! doctr9e ( "o nature4 ,to ! pieti/ ! div9e seems all important1 & ! mat]ial no help1 b r a h9drance to ! spiritual life4 ,! fai? ( ! individual to him is ! seat ( ! efficacy ( ! sacram5ts2 he reg>ds matt] z unreal if n s9ful1 & 9 ei!r case unwor?y to be a *annel ( div9e grace4 ,e*o aft] e*o ( monophysite ?\ght c be caught "h4 ,! sure/ way to combat sacram5tal errors on bo? sides is a cle> & def9ite /atem5t ( ! ca?olic doctr9e ( ,*ri/ology4 ,,ne$ ,,( ,a ,,m5tal ,,recon/ruction ,,( ,,! ,,human ,,nature ,,( ,,*ri/ ,z ! int]val ( "t wid5s1 sep>at+ ,*ri/ians f ! human life ( _! ,god1 ! m urg5t becomes ! obligation to put =? a con/ructive ef=t ( ! hi/orical imag9ation4 ,! attempt to keep t memory gre5 gr[s h>d] & h>d] z ! c5turies pass2 b ,*ri/ians mu/ make x2 o!rwise ! hi/orical "* ( _! religion w p]i%4 ,!re ne$ be no fe> t ! int]e/s ( spiritual religion w suff]4 ,among/ mod]ns ! dang] ( idealis+ ! human is great] ?an t ( humanis+ ! div9e4 ,an intellig5t appreciation ( ,*ri/'s human life draws out love & k9dles rev]5ce t[>ds ! div9e p]sonality :o condesc5d$ to ! level ( mank9d4 ,we may po9t by way ( illu/ration to ! effect ( biblical criticism4 ,*ri/ians ( a previ\s g5]ation dread$ ! t\* ( criticism4 ,!y ?\ght x pr(anation4 ,!y refus$ to admit any human elem5t 9 ! bible4 ,criticism1 h[ev]1 _h its way4 ,bibliolatry _h to g4 ,! result is t ! bible is a liv+ book to u to-day4 ,9 spite ( ! fe>s ( ! dev\t !re 0 little to lose & mu* to ga9 by recognis+ ! human elem5t 9 ! bible4 ,z ) ! writt5 ^w1 s ) ! liv+ ,^w4 ,)\t a recognition ( ! human elem5t 9 ,8 be+1 a full assimilation ( ,8 tea*+ & an intimate p]ception ( ,8 real pres5ce are unatta9able4 ,if ?is recognition be accord$1 ! great pa/ w live aga9 9 ! pres5t4 ,ho/ile critics /udy ! life & "* ( ,*ri/ & ! records ( !m ) a view to prov+ t ,he 0 m]ely man4 ,believ]s may adopt _! me?od ) a diff]5t object4 ,!y may und]take ! same /udy 9 ord] to compreh5d ! wond] ( ! ,man1 & s rise to "s conception ( ! wond] ( ! ,god4 ,! gospels are read ma9ly z a h&book ( devotion2 !y %\ld be /udi$ z ! biography ( a h]o4 ,! face-value ( its incid5ts is (t5 neglect$1 :ile ! read] seeks allegorical & my/ical int]pretations4 ,to =m a m5tal picture ( ,*ri/ 9 ,8 environm5t1 to read ourselves back into ,8 _w & !n into ,8 ways ( ?\ght1 su* ef=ts are m ?an ev] ne$$ to-day1 & !y are m ?an ev] abs5t4 ,hi/oric s5se & imag9ation %\ld be all[$ to play ^u ! record$ acts & say+s ( ,jesus1 until a great temple to ,8 memory rises 9 ! high places ( ! m9d1 dom9at+ !nce ! :ole intellectual & moral life4 ,su* an ent]prise w\ld infuse life & mean+ into ! ,*ri/ological =mula1 & w\ld effect1 s to speak1 a recon/ruction ( ! human nature ( ! hi/oric ,*ri/4 ,! ,*ri/ian's attitude t[>ds ! ,man ,*ri/ ,jesus is ! acid te/ ( ! s9c]ity ( 8 fai?4 ,no "o c br+ intellectual difficulties to a be+ to :om cognis+ 0 a =eign process1 nor moral difficulties to "o :o knew no conflict ( wills1 nor sorr[s to "o all brea?+ human passion f> above4 ,if we picture ! ideal ( all mank9d z ?9k+ our ?\ghts1 will+ z we w1 feel+ z we feel1 we are unit$ to ,him by an intellectual1 moral & emotional bond ( sympa?y4 ,su* a ?reefold cord is n quickly brok54 ,communion ) su* a ,be+ leads ! wor%ipp] to ! he>t ( ! ,*ri/ian religion4 ,,! ,,end ,,pr9t$ ,,by ,,william ,,cl[es ,,& ,,sons1 ,,limit$1 ,,london ,,& ,,beccles4