,transcrib]'s note3 ,text enclos$ betwe5 und]scores 0 9 italics 9 ! orig9al 7italics74 ,text enclos$ betwe5 equal s+s 0 9 bold face 9 ! orig9al 7bold74 ,a li/ ( *anges made to ! text is at ! end ( ! e-book4 ,,! ,,*ur* ,,! ,,s*ools & ,,evolution by ,j4 ,e4 ,,conant1 ,d4,d4 ,bible ,tea*] & ,evangeli/ ,au?or ( ,:y ! ,pa/or ,fail$1 ,is x ,s*ol>ly to ,be ,or?odox8 ,is ,atonem5t by ,sub/itution ,reasonable8 ,div9e ,dynamite1 etc4 ,*icago ,! ,bible ,in/itute ,colportage ,ass'n #hbf ,nor? ,la ,salle ,/reet ,copyright1 #aibb by ,j4 ,e4 ,conant ,,=eword ,! foll[+ pages h gr[n out ( a pap]1 foll[+ ! same outl9e m briefly1 :i* 0 read be=e ! ,pa/ors' ,conf]5ce ( ! ,san ,juaqu9 ,valley ,bapti/ ,association1 ! l>ge/ association 9 ! ,nor!rn ,cali=nia ,bapti/ ,conv5tion4 ,at ! close ( ! read+ a reque/ = its publication 0 en?usia/ically & unanim\sly vot$4 ,! au?or has s9ce divid$ ! pap] into two *apt]s2 9 ! fir/ *apt] has add$ to & classifi$ ! quotations conc]n+ evolution1 has enl>g$ ! rem>ks on ! influ5ce ( evolution on ,scripture doctr9e1 & has bo? enl>g$ ^u & entirely re>rang$ ! matt] ( ! second *apt]1 9 an attempt to make x bo? m obvi\s & m conclusive to ! read] ?an x 0 felt to be to ! he>]s4 ,! t]m ,*ur* 9 ! foll[+ pages is int5d$ to cov] t fell[%ip1 ( e "n1 :i* includes all :o h be5 really born aga94 ,:5 organiz$ *ur* fell[%ip is ref]r$ to1 ! :ole evangelical ,prote/ant fell[%ip 9 g5]al is meant1 z di/+ui%$ f ,roman ,ca?olic1 ,greek *ur*1 or any o!r non-evangelical fai?1 al?\gh true ,*ri/ians are to be f\nd )9 e fell[%ip4 ,! t]m ,s*ools1 9 its l>g] mean+1 includes all in/itutions ( le>n+ ma9ta9$ at private1 d5om9ational1 or public exp5se2 m specifically1 ^? dom9at$ by ! pres5t evolution>y philosophy are meant4 ,) notable exceptions 9 a few s*ools t refuse to be s dom9at$1 ! :ole educational sy/em 9 g5]al1 especially 9 ! ,nor!rn ,/ates1 has practically capitulat$ to ! evolutioni/s1 & ! s*ools t h s surr5d]$ are p>ticul>ly 9 m9d 9 ! foll[+ discussion4 ,x is b a humble ef=t to po9t out :at is obvi\sly ! only possible solution = ! pres5t di/ress+ & de/ructive controv]sy betwe5 ! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools1 b ! au?or fondly hopes t x w prove to be a real1 ev5 ?\gh small1 contribution t[>d ! end+ ( t controv]sy4 ,x is s5t out ) ! pray] t ,he :o is ,tru? inc>nate may lead ^? 9 bo? ! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools :o really want to "k ! tru? at all co/ to a common attitude t[>d ,himself1 to a common1 because truly sci5tific1 me?od ( inve/igat+ tru? 9 bo? ! natural & ! spiritual realms1 & !re=e to a common goal :i* w unite !m aga9/ all ^? =ces t seek to capture bo? ! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools = ! enemy4 ,j4 ,e4 ,conant4 ,,cont5ts ,,*apt] ,i ,,! ,,pres5t ,,controv]sy--,,! ,,cause ,page ,i4 ,! ,!ory ( ,evolution is ,unprov5 #aa #a4 ,! ,te/imony = ,evolution #ab #b4 ,! ,te/imony ,aga9/ ,evolution a4 ,9 ! ,biological ,realm2 7i7 ,! ,doctr9e ( ,natural ,selection2 7ii7 ,! ,doctr9e ( ,acquir$ ,*>act]s2 7iii7 ,! ,biog5etic ,law #ad b4 ,9 ! ,geological ,realm #ai c4 ,! ,:ole ,!ory 9 ,g5]al #bj ,,ii4 ,! ,logic ( ,evolution is ,de/ructive #bc #a4 ,evolution & ,inspiration #bc #b4 ,evolution & ! ,fall ( ,man #bf #c4 ,evolution & ! ,nature ( ,s9 #bi #d4 ,evolution & ! ,nature ( ,*ri/ #cb #e4 ,evolution & ! ,atonem5t #cd #f4 ,evolution & ! ,new ,bir? #ce #g4 ,evolution & ! ,hol9ess ( ,god #dj ,,*apt] ,,ii ,,! ,,pres5t ,,controv]sy--,,! ,,cure ,i4 ,tru? ,mu/ be ,classifi$ ,sci5tifically #df #a4 ,! ,realms ( ,tru? ,mu/ be ,classifi$ #df #b4 ,! ,faculties ( ,inve/igation ,mu/ be ,di/+ui%$ #dg #c4 ,! ,diff]5t ,k9ds ( ,tru? ,mu/ be ,sep>at$ #eb #d4 ,! ,primacy ( ,prim>y ,tru? ,mu/ be ,ma9ta9$ #eb ,,ii4 ,tru? ,mu/ be ,inve/igat$ ,sci5tifically #ee #a4 ,fai? ,mu/ be ,giv5 ,prec$5ce ,ov] ,reason #ee a4 ,! ,me?od ( ! ,rationali/ #ef b4 ,! ,me?od ( ! ,believ] #fa #b4 ,! ,spiritual ,realm ,mu/ be ,giv5 ,primacy ,ov] ! ,natural #fh a4 ,by ,surr5d]+ ! ,he>t to ,god #gj b4 ,by ,int]pret+ ,natural ,tru? 9 ! ,light ( ! ,bible #gf ,! ,*ur*1 ! ,s*ools & ,evolution ,,*apt] ,i ,! ,pres5t ,controv]sy--! ,cause ,x mu/ be s self-evid5t z to be axiomatic t !re are two di/9ct realms 9 ,god's univ]se4 ,"o is ! realm t conta9s ! ,creator1 & ! o!r t :i* conta9s ,8 creation4 ,( c\rse1 if we are pan!i/s1 we w n admit t classification2 b ^? :o believe & accept ! ,^w ( ,god are n pan!i/s4 ,x is inevitable1 !re=e1 t ! facts1 ! v]ities1 ! tru?s ( ! univ]se %\ld be classifi$ accord+ to _! realms2 ^? hav+ to d ) ! ,p]son & relation%ips ( ! ,creator be+ sep>able into "o realm1 & ^? hav+ to d ) ,8 creation into ano!r4 ,t ?is classification is univ]sally recogniz$1 is a matt] ( common k4 ,t class ( tru? :i* has to d ) ,god we call sup]natural1 or spiritual1 tru?1 & t :i* relates to ,8 creation we call natural1 or sci5tific1 tru?4 ,x is precisely because ( ?is classification t !re are two sep>ate in/itutions 9 ! _w1 ea* ( :i* is work+ 9 "o ( ^! realms4 ,! ,*ur* accepts x z h] function to receive & propagate spiritual tru?1 z ,god has reveal$ ,himself 9 ,8 "*2 :ile ! ,s*ools accept x z _! function to /udy & tea* sci5tific tru?1 z ,god has reveal$ ,himself 9 ,8 works4 ,?is is ! entire logic ( ! exi/5ce 9 ! _w ( ^! two sep>ate in/itutions1 bo? ( :i* are engag$ 9 ! inve/igation & propagation ( tru?4 ,b al?\gh ! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools are entirely sep>ate in/itutions1 & al?\gh !y are engag$1 "o 9 ! spread ( spiritual tru? & ! o!r 9 ! diffusion ( sci5tific tru?1 yet tru? is an et]nal unity4 ,?is mu/ be s1 9 ! nature ( ?+s1 = all tru? proce$s f & reveals ! "o & only ,god ,:o is its ,s\rce & ( ,:om x is ! consi/5t & p]fect expression4 ,conflict betwe5 ^! two realms ( tru? is1 !re=e1 et]nally impossible4 ,m5 talk ( a conflict betwe5 sci5ce & ! ,bible1 b no su* conflict exi/s4 ,if !re is any contradiction1 x is n betwe5 ! /atem5ts ( ,scripture & ! facts ( sci5ce1 b betwe5 ! false int]pretations ( ,scripture & ! immature conclusions ( sci5ce4 ,h]b]t ,sp5c] 0 "r :5 he said3 ,x is incr$ible t !re %\ld be two ord]s ( tru? 9 absolute & ev]la/+ opposition4 ,n until ,god beg9s to contradict ,himself w ^! two realms ( tru? ev] be 9 conflict ) ea* o!r4 ,! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools1 !n1 c nev] be 9 conflict until "s abnormal condition creeps into ! "o or ! o!r2 =1 al?\gh work+ 9 diff]5t realms ( tru?1 ea* is yet receiv+ revelations ( ! "o ,god :o c nev] be 9 conflict ) ,himself4 ,:5 ^! two in/itutions are 9 normal condition1 ea* w n only n de/roy ! "w ( ! o!r1 b ea* w make e possible contribution to ! success ( ! o!r1 & antagonism betwe5 !m w be impossible4 ,:5 conflict occurs1 !re=e1 x is because ! tea*]s 9 "o realm or 9 bo? h n arriv$ at ! tru? 9 _! respective realms4 ,& s :5 ! ,*ur* d5ies ! facts--n ! unprov5 !ories1 notice1 b ! cle>ly demon/rat$ facts--( sci5ce1 some?+ is wrong ) ! ,*ur*4 ,& :5 ! ,s*ools put =? !ories t und]m9e ! v f\ndations ( ! ,*ur* & h] "w1 !re is some?+ wrong ) ! ,s*ools4 ,n[ x is no secret t ! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools1 broadly speak+1 are 9 s]i\s conflict ) ea* o!r today4 ,:]e lies ! cause8 ,if ! ,*ur* is d5y+ & fight+ ! demon/rat$ facts ( sci5ce1 !n ! ,*ur* is cle>ly at fault & ought to get "r at once4 ,b ?is is n s1 = ! conflict is altoge!r ov] unprov5 !ories1 & has no?+ to d ) demon/rat$ sci5tific facts4 ,& s ?is takes u at once & completely out ( ! realm ( sci5ce & l&s u 9 t ( speculative philosophy--a fact t %[s h[ unreasonable & ev5 fooli% ! conflict is4 ,= ! ?+ t has set ! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools into battle array aga9/ ea* o!r is t speculative guess conc]n+ orig9s call$ ! ,!ory ( ,evolution4 ,?is lies at ! he>t ( ! opposition t ea* ( ^! great in/itutions feels t[>d ! o!r4 ,x is true t a c]ta9 am\nt ( ! tr\ble arises f misund]/&+1 because ! t]m evolution is us$ 9 s _m loose1 illogical1 & unsci5tific ways2 b back ( all misuse ( ! t]m !re is a fundam5tal cause on :i* ?is antagonism re/s1 & t cause is f\nd 9 ! nature ( ! !ory & its effects on ^? :o consi/5tly believe x4 ,! te*nical mean+ ( ! t]m may be said to be a /ructural *ange 9 ! direction ( developm5t into high] =ms ( exi/5ce1 br\ght ab\t by int]nal =ce )\t ext]nal aid4 ,!re is also a sci5tific classification ( ! subject1 into sub-organic1 organic1 & sup]-organic evolution4 ,sub-organic evolution applies to ! developm5t ( non-liv+ matt]2 organic1 to ! developm5t ( vegetable & animal life2 & sup]-organic1 to ! developm5t ( intellectual1 moral1 & spiritual life4 ,b :ile ! subject is ?us classifi$ = conv5i5ce1 x is all "o doctr9e1 & is meant to describe "o process ( developm5t f ! non-liv+ realm to ! spiritual4 ,!re is also "o !ory :i* is call$ causal1 & ano!r :i* is call$ modal1 evolution4 ,accord+ to ! =m]1 evolution is ! fir/ cause ( all life1 :i*1 ( c\rse1 excludes ,god z ! ,fir/ ,cause2 & accord+ to ! latt]1 evolution is ! mode1 or me?od1 us$ by ,god 9 creation4 ,n[1 ! ,*ur* has vital reasons = fight+ ?is philosophical guess4 ,"o reason is1 t x is entirely unsupport$ by facts1 & is !re=e altoge!r unprov54 ,b if ?is 7 ! only reason1 ! ,*ur* c\ld be convict$ ( ! supreme folly ( h] entire hi/ory1 = turn+ aside to fight an unprov5 guess4 ,a m vital reason is t ! !ory does n /op ) ! natural realm1 b goes "r on up into ! realm ( spiritual tru?1 & assumes to pron\nce on ! mo/ vital spiritual realities 9 su* a way t ! logic ( ! !ory1 if consi/5tly accept$1 utt]ly de/roys bo? ! f\ndations ( ! ,*ur* & ! cont5t ( ! ,gospel4 ,inde$1 evolution has be5 proclaim$ to ! _w z ! ally ( a philosophy :i* boa/s ( its capacity to drive ,*ri/ianity out ( exi/5ce4 ,= ! ,*ur*1 !re=e1 to fail to fight a !ory t /rikes at h] v vitals w\ld be to become a traitor to ! ,"l :o b\ght h] & s5t h] into ! _w to prea* ,8 gospel4 ,& s %e is compell$ to *oose betwe5 submitt+ to an unprov5 & de/ructive !ory1 :i* has nev] sav$ any "o :o has believ$ x1 & prea*+ ! gospel ( ,god's grace1 :i* has infallibly sav$ e "o :o has believ$ x4 ,! true ,*ur* is fight+ ! !ory ( evolution 9 ord] t ! message %e is commission$ to prea* may n be r5d]$ ( no effect by a non-bellig]5t attitude t[>d x be+ mi/ak5 = approval ( x4 ,n only ! fact t ! !ory is entirely unprov51 b also & m p>ticul>ly ! nature ( its influ5ce on fai? 9 ! ,bible compels ! ,*ur* to reckon ) x4 ,we w g into ^! two reasons = antagoniz+ ?is speculative guess4 ,i4 ,! ,!ory ( ,evolution is ,unprov54 ,! reason we reflect on ?is = a few mom5ts lies 9 :at has already be5 said4 ,if evolution is a fact1 !n = ! ,*ur* to refuse x & fight aga9/ x w\ld be to fight aga9/ ,god1 :i* ought to br+ h] to swift judgm5t = h] mad folly4 ,b if x is only an unprov5 !ory1 !n %e is ju/ifi$ if %e has good reasons = fight+ its propagation4 ,we w !re=e note :at ! sci5ti/s !mselves h to say reg>d+ ! !ory4 #a4 ,te/imony = ,evolution4 ,!re are tea*]s ( sci5ce :o d n hesitate to assure u t ! doctr9e ( evolution is n[ no long] a !ory b an assur$ fact4 ,a few repres5tative quotations f t class w suffice4 ,dr4 ,p4 ,c4 ,mit*ell says1 9 a late edition ( ! ,encyclop$ia ,britannica3 ,! va/ bulk ( botanical & biological "w on liv+ & ext9ct =ms publi%$ dur+ ! la/ qu>t] ( ! n9ete5? c5tury increas$ almo/ beyond all expectation ! evid5ce = ! fact ( evolution4 ,pr(4 ,s4 ,c4 ,s*muck]1 ( ! ,we/ ,*e/]1 ,p5nsylvania1 ,/ate ,normal ,s*ool1 9 8 book1 ,! ,mean+ ( ,evolution1 says3 ,among /ud5ts ( animals & plants !re is no long] any "q z to ! tru? ( evolution4 ,t ! animals ( ! pres5t are ! alt]$ animals ( ! pa/1 t ! plants ( today are ! modifi$ plants ( ye/]day1 t civiliz$ man ( today is ! savage ( ye/]day & ! tree dwell] ( ! day be=e1 is no long] debatable to ! mass ( biologi/s4 ,pr(essor ,fi%1 !n ( ,d5ison ,univ]sity1 ,granville1 ,ohio1 n long ago dictat$ to 8 class1 ( :i* ! writ]'s daught] 0 a memb]1 ! foll[+ /atem5t3 ,organic evolution is ! key to all biological ?9k+ ( today4 ,x is n a !ory b a fact1 because ! ma9 facts are true4 ,man is ! (f-spr+ ( ! l[] animals1 & ! ance/ry c be trac$ back to ! simple/ =ms ( animals kn[n4 ,all m$ical rese>* takes t fact into acc\nt4 ,pr(4 ,s4 ,w4 ,willi/on1 dep>tm5t ( paleontology1 ,univ]sity ( ,*icago1 says3 ,i "k ( no biologi/1 :e!r ( high or l[ degree1 ma/] or tyro1 :o v5tures to sugge/ a d\bt z to ! fundam5tal tru?s ( organic evolution4 ,pr(4 ,william ,patt51 dep>tm5t ( biology & zoology1 ,d>tm\? ,college1 says3 ,evolution is ! accept$ doctr9e ( ! natural sci5ces to ! ext5t t x has long ceas$ to be a subject ( debate 9 /&>d sci5tific j\rnals or 9 organiz$ conf]5ces ( m5 ( sci5ce4 ,pr(4 ,*>les ,b4 ,dav5port1 dep>tm5t ( exp]im5tal evolution1 ,c>negie ,in/itute1 ,wa%+ton1 ,d4 ,c41 says3 ,i d n "k ( a s+le mod]n sci5tific man :o does n believe 9 evolution4 ,& ,pr(4 ,frank ,r4 ,lillie1 dep>tm5t ( embryology1 ,univ]sity ( ,*icago1 says3 ,i feel pretty impati5t ov] ! /atem5ts ( c]ta9 religi\s tea*]s t evolution has collaps$4 ,^! /atem5ts are suffici5tly repres5tative to indicate ! attitude t[>d ! !ory ( evolution ( a great section ( ! sci5tific _w today1 includ+ _m sci5ce tea*]s 9 s*ools f\nd$ & end[$ by ! ,*ur* = ! giv+ ( ,*ri/ian education4 ,b x is n true t ! !ory is univ]sally accept$ or ev5 sci5tifically prov$ to be a fact4 ,let a few sci5ti/s ( at lea/ equal em95ce ) ^? quot$ above be> _! te/imony4 #b4 ,te/imony ,aga9/ ,evolution4 ,b be=e we quote ?is te/imony x may be well to pause a mom5t = a little in=mation t may make x m intelligible to u4 ,! s-call$ pro(s ( evolution are d]iv$ f bo? ! biological & ! geological realms ( natural sci5ce4 a4 ,we w consid]1 fir/1 ! s-call$ pro(s tak5 f ! biological realm4 ,d>w9's !ory 0 arriv$ at f data tak5 f ! biological realm1 & consi/s ( two doctr9es4 ,"o is ! doctr9e ( natural selection1 :i* 0 8 own p]sonal contribution to ! discussion1 & ! o!r is t ( ! inh]itance ( acquir$ *>act]s1 :i* he borr[$ f ,lam>ck4 ,! =m] is ! doctr9e meant :5 pure ,d>w9ism is ref]r$ to4 7i74 ,! ,doctr9e ( ,natural ,selection4 ,d>w9 himself said3 ,we _c prove t a s+le species has *ang$1 &1 also1 ,_m ( ! objections to ! hypo!sis ( evolution are s s]i\s ,i c h>dly reflect on !m )\t be+ /agg]$4 ,dr4 ,n4 ,s4 ,%al]1 dep>tm5t ( geology1 ,h>v>d1 says3 ,x beg9s to be evid5t t ! ,d>w9ian hypo!sis is /ill ess5tially unv]ifi$4444 ,x is n yet prov5 t a s+le species ( ! two or ?ree million n[ inhabit+ ! e>? _h be5 e/abli%$ solely or ma9ly by ! op]ation ( natural selection4 ,pr(essor ,fleis*mann1 ( ,erlang51 has said3 ,! ,d>w9ian !ory ( desc5t has 9 ! realms ( nature n a s+le fact to confirm x4 ,x is n ! result ( sci5tific rese>*1 b purely ! product ( ! imag9ation4 ,& ,john ,burr\ghs1 al?\gh an evolutioni/ up to 8 rec5t dea?1 said ( ,d>w91 9 ! ,augu/1 #aibj1 ,atlantic ,mon?ly3 ,he has already be5 z completely %orn ( 8 selection doctr9es z ,samson 0 %orn ( 8 locks4 ,if ^! /atem5ts f sci5tific m5 mean any?+ at all1 !y mean1 at lea/1 t pure ,d>w9ism is altoge!r unprov51 if n t x is dead4 7ii74 ,! ,doctr9e ( ,acquir$ ,*>act]s4 ,sp5c] made ?is doctr9e ! fundam5tal "o 9 8 evolution>y philosophy4 ,its importance 0 s vital to him t he said3 ,close contemplation ( ! facts impresses me m /rongly ?an ev] ) ! two alt]natives--ei!r !re has be5 inh]itance ( acquir$ *>act]s1 or !re has be5 no evolution4 ,x is ( great int]e/1 !re=e1 to note :at compet5t sci5ti/s h said ab\t ?is doctr9e4 ,dr4 ,?omas ,hunt ,morgan1 dep>tm5t ( sci5ce1 ,columbia ,univ]sity1 says3 ,today ! !ory has few foll[]s among tra9$ inve/igators1 b x /ill has a popul> vogue t is wide-spread & vocif]\s4 ,alfr$ ,russell ,wallace1 9 8 ,autobiography1 said3 ,all ! available evid5ce is oppos$ to ! doctr9e ( acquir$ *>act]s4 ,pr(4 ,william ,bateson1 9 8 #aiad ,presid5tial ,address be=e ! ,briti% ,association = ! ,advancem5t ( ,sci5ce1 said3 ,we h done ) ! notion t ,d>w9 came latt]ly to favor1 t l>ge diff]5ces c arise by ! accumulation ( small diff]5ces4 ,he also rem>ks t ! new k ( h]$ity %[s t :atev] evolution !re is occurs by loss ( factors & n by ga91 & t 9 ?is way ! progress ( sci5ce is de/roy+ mu* t till lately pass$ = gospel4 ,& comm5t+ on ^! rem>ks ( ,bateson1 ,pr(4 ,s4 ,c4 ,holmes1 ( ! ,univ]sity ( ,cali=nia1 says !y are an illu/ration ( ! bankruptcy ( ! pres5t evolution>y !ory4 ,!n ,pr(4 ,george ,mc,cready ,price1 dep>tm5t ( geology1 ,pacific ,union ,college1 ,hel5a1 ,cali=nia1 has said v rec5tly3 ,x has long s9ce be5 def9itely settl$ t acquir$ *>act]s are n transmitt$ 9 h]$ity4 ,& 9 ano!r place he exclaims3 ,if cells did n ma9ta9 _! ance/ral "* 9 a v rem>kable way1 :at w\ld be ! use ( graft+ a good k9d ( fruit on to a /ock ( poor] quality8 ,! v p]man5cy ( ! graft ?us produc$ is pro( ( ! p]si/5cy ) :i* ! cells reproduce only aft] _! k9d4 ,!n 9 speak+ ( ,m5del's discov]ies 9 ! realm ( h]$ity1 & :i* h n[ become sci5tifically demon/rat$ laws1 he says t ! :ole f\ndation ( biological evolution has be5 completely und]m9$ by ^! new discov]ies4 ,& he sums up ! conclusions to :i* pres5t-day sci5ti/s are com+1 9 ! words3 ,! pr9ciples ( h]$ity1 z n[ und]/ood1 h br\ght u back to t great tru? :i* is giv5 9 ! fir/ *apt] ( our ,bible1 t ea* =m ( plant or animal 0 design$ by ! ,creator to reproduce only aft] its k9d4 ,! "o :o accepts ?is te/imony1 !re=e1 is compell$ to conclude t ! doctr9e ( acquir$ *>act]s is also dead4 7iii74 ,! ,biog5etic ,law4 ,9 addition to ! two =ms ( ! !ory above not$1 ,haeckel add$ emphasis to ^! s-call$ biological pro(s by putt+ =? a doctr9e t came to be call$ ! biog5etic law1 ev5 ?\gh x 0 no?+ b a hypo!sis4 ,x 0 call$ ! recapitulation !ory1 because x 0 imag9$ t ! develop+ human embryo recapitulates or passes ?r\gh successive /ages ( ! m mature =ms ( "s ( ! l[] animals4 ,conc]n+ ?is !ory ,dr4 ,a4 ,web]1 ,univ]sity ( ,g5eva1 ,switz]l&1 said 9 ! ,sci5tific ,am]ican ,mon?ly = ,febru>y1 #aiba3 ,! critical comm5ts ( su* m5 z ,o4 ,h]twig1 ,kiebel1 & ,vialleton1 inde$1 h practically torn to %r$s ! a=esaid fundam5tal biog5etic law4 ,its almo/ univ]sal ab&onm5t has left consid]ably at a loss ^? inve/igators :o s\ght 9 ! /ructures ( organisms ! key to _! remote orig9s or to _! relation%ips4 ,s x w\ld seem t if ?is =m ( ! !ory is utt]ly de/itute ( pro(1 ! :ole biological f\ndation ( ! !ory is gone4 ,x is p]fectly 9 h>mony ) sci5tific te/imony1 !re=e1 t ,pr(essor ,price says conc]n+ ?is phase ( ! !ory3 ,! sci5ce ( tw5ty or ?irty ye>s ago 0 9 high glee at ! ?\ght ( hav+ almo/ prov$ ! !ory ( biological evolution4 ,today1 = e c>eful1 c&id inquir]1 ^! hopes are cru%$2 & ) we>y1 reluctant sadness does mod]n biology n[ confess t ! ,*ur* has probably be5 "r all ! "t4 ,if ^! m5 h borne fai?ful te/imony to ! situation z x n[ exi/s 9 ! biological realm1 ! only conclusion possible is t ! borr[$ portion ( ,d>w9's !ory has also utt]ly collaps$4 ,x is pass+ /range1 9 view ( ^! facts1 t compet5t & s*ol>ly m5 ( sci5ce %\ld /ill cl+ to a !ory s utt]ly discr$it$ by em95t sci5ti/s4 ,is x because !y are det]m9$ to believe 9 evolution 9 spite ( su* evid5ce to ! contr>y1 or is x because !re is /ill left a f\ndation = ! doctr9e ly+ back ( all ?is :i* has n yet be5 di/urb$1 ev5 ?\gh ! biological clues h all run out1 z ,pr(essor ,price says !y h8 ,! suppos$ evid5ce ( geology1 ) its !ories ( uni=mity & successive ages1 =ms precisely su* a f\ndation4 b4 ,we w consid]1 !re=e1 9 ! next place1 ! s-call$ pro(s tak5 f ! geological realm4 ,dr4 ,t4 ,h4 ,morgan1 :o 0 quot$ above z aga9/ ! !ory ( ! inh]itance ( acquir$ *>act]s1 re/s 8 fai? 9 ! !ory ( evolution on a geological f\ndation4 ,he says3 ,! direct evid5ce furni%$ by fossil rema9s is by all odds ! /ronge/ evid5ce we h 9 favor ( organic evolution4 ,has pres5t-day sci5ce any?+ to say ab\t ?is8 ,9 spite ( ! collapse ( ! suppos$ biological pro(s1 are !re any tangible & sci5tifically e/abli%$ pro(s 9 ! geological realm8 ,pr(essor ,price1 :o1 z not$ above1 is a geologi/1 & !re=e speaks accord+ to fir/-h& k1 %[s t fossil rema9s are deposit$ ov] _m ?\s&s ( squ>e miles 9 widely sep>at$ sections ( ! e>?1 n only 9 ! opposite ord] f t requir$ to prove ! !ory ( evolution1 b 9 a great v>iety ( ord]s1 demon/rat+1 z he says1 t !y _c be arrang$ (f into ages1 b t !y simply indicate diff]5t =ms ( life t exi/$ side by side4 ,he !n exclaims3 ,h[ mu* ( ! e>?'s cru/ w\ld we h to f9d 9 ?is upside d[n ord] ( ! fossils1 be=e we w\ld be conv9c$ t !re mu/ be some?+ hopelessly wrong ) ! !ory ( ,successive ,ages :i* drives o!rwise compet5t obs]v]s to ?r[ away _! common s5se & cl+ desp]ately to a fanta/ic !ory 9 ! v tee? ( su* facts8 ,!n he tells u t ! !ory ( ,successive ,ages1 ) ! =ms ( life appe>+ on e>? 9 a precise & inv>iable ord]1 is dead = all com+ "t = e man :o has _h a *ance to exam9e ! evid5ce & has en\gh tra9+ 9 logic & sci5tific me?ods to "k :5 a ?+ is really prov$4 ,& he concludes t ! "w ( /rict inductive sci5ce has de/roy$ ?is fanta/ic s*eme =ev]1 & ?us leaves ! way op5 to say t life mu/ h orig9at$ by j su* a lit]al creation z is record$ 9 ! fir/ *apt]s ( ! ,bible4 ,if ^! /atem5ts h any mean+ at all1 !y c mean only t ! geological f\ndation = ! !ory ( evolution has also collaps$4 c4 ,x rema9s = u to li/5 to ! te/imony ( a few m m5 ( sci5ce conc]n+ ! :ole !ory ( evolution 9 g5]al4 ,pr(essor ,vir*[1 ! greate/ ,g]man au?ority on physiology1 & once a /rong advocate ( ! !ory1 has said3 ,x is all nons5se4 ,x _c be prov$ by sci5ce t man desc5ds f ! ape or f any o!r animal4 ,s9ce ! ann\ncem5t ( ! !ory1 all real sci5tific k has proce$$ 9 ! opposite direction4 ,pr(essor ,tyndall1 9 an article 9 ! ,=tnightly ,review1 said3 ,!re ought to be a cle> di/9ction made betwe5 sci5ce 9 a /ate ( hypo!sis & sci5ce 9 a /ate ( fact4 ,& inasmu* z x is /ill 9 its hypo!tical /age1 ! ban ( exclusion ought to fall ^u ! !ory ( evolution4 ,i agree ) ,vir*[ t ! pro(s ( x are /ill want+1 t ! failures h be5 lam5table1 & t ! doctr9e has be5 utt]ly discr$it$4 ,pr(4 ,l4 ,s4 ,beal1 physiologi/ & pr(essor ( anatomy 9 ,k+'s ,college1 ,london1 says3 ,! idea ( any relation hav+ be5 e/abli%$ betwe5 ! non-liv+ & ! liv+ by a gradual advance f lifeless matt] to ! l[e/ =ms ( life1 & s onw>d to ! high] & m complex1 has n ! slighte/ evid5ce f ! facts ( any section ( liv+ nature ( :i* any?+ is kn[n4 ,pr(essor ,zoeckl]1 ( ! ,univ]sity ( ,greifswald1 says3 ,! claim t ! hypo!sis ( desc5t is sci5tifically secur$ mu/ mo/ decid$ly be d5i$4 ,de,cyon1 ! ,russian sci5ti/1 says3 ,evolution is pure assumption4 ,pr(4 ,george ,mc,cready ,price says3 ,9 almo/ e "o ( ! sep>ate sci5ces ! argum5ts ^u :i* ! !ory ( evolution ga9$ its popul>ity a g5]ation or s ago are n[ kn[n by ! v>i\s speciali/s to h be5 blund]s1 or mi/akes1 or ha/y conclusions ( "o k9d or ano!r4 ,& ,sir ,j4 ,william ,dawson says3 ,! evolution doctr9e itself is "o ( ! /range/ ph5om5a ( humanity4 ,x is a sy/em de/itute ( any %ad[ ( pro(1 & support$ m]ely by vague analogies & figures ( spee*1 & by ! arbitr>y & artificial coh]5ce ( its p>ts4 ,& he concludes t x is surpass+ly /range t su* a !ory %\ld f9d adh]5ts4 ,to ?is li/ might be add$ su* names z ^? ( ,pr(essor ,h5sl[1 =m] ,presid5t ( ! ,briti% ,association2 ,pr(4 ,c4 ,c4 ,ev]ett1 ( ,h>v>d2 ,dr4 ,e4 ,d5n]t2 ,dr4 ,goette2 ,pr(4 ,edw>d ,hoppe1 ! ,hamburg ,savant2 ,pr(essor ,paulson1 ( ,b]l92 ,pr(essor ,rutemey]1 ( ,basel2 & ,pr(4 ,max ,wundt1 ( ,leipsic4 ,aft] all ?is contr>y te/imony on ! "p ( su* unque/ion$ au?orities1 we are =c$ to conclude n only t ! te/imony = evolution is f> f unanim\s1 b also t ! !ory is altoge!r unprov51 & t x is !re=e utt]ly unsci5tific to tea* x z a fact1 especially :5 ^? :o d s furni% u ) no direct evid5ce :atev]4 ,s long1 !re=e1 z !re is an unbridg$ gulf 9 ! sub-organic realm betwe5 no?+ & matt]1 9 ! organic realm betwe5 ! non-liv+ & ! liv+1 & 9 ! sup]-organic realm betwe5 animals & man1 ! ,*ur* _c be blam$ = be+ sci5tific en\gh to refuse to accept su* an unprov5 & discr$it$ !ory1 at lea/ until a few facts are =?com+4 ,until !n we mu/ conclude t all ! pro(s ! sci5ti/s c furni% re/ altoge!r on inf]5ces & assumptions4 ,:5 evolutioni/s c produce matt] f no?+ or increase en]gy by any natural means kn[n to man1 or br+ =? ! liv+ f ! non-liv+1 or br+ into exi/5ce ev5 "o new & di/9ct species1 !n !y w be 9 a position to compel ! ,*ur* to li/5 to pro(s2 b until !n ! ,*ur* is =c$ to reject evolution4 ,! mo/ s]i\s aspect ( ! controv]sy1 h[ev]1 lies 9 ! second objection m5tion$ above4 ,,ii4 ,! ,logic ( ,evolution ,is ,de/ructive4 ,x is de/ructive ( all ! fundam5tal doctr9es ! ,*ur* 0 s5t into ! _w to prea*4 #a4 ,x de/roys ! doctr9e ( ! inspiration ( ! ,bible1 by d5y+ its in]rancy & infallible & f9al au?ority4 ,ov] & aga9 9 ! e>ly v]ses ( ,g5esis we are told t ,god creat$ ! v>i\s species to reproduce aft] _! k9d4 ,b evolution says t ?is is n true1 = z a matt] ( fact1 ! v>i\s species h cont9u\sly evolv$ f "o to ano!r all ! way to man4 ,to a m9d t is work+ normally1 ^! two propositions are mutually exclusive4 ,& s ^? :o reta9 _! intellectual integrity & consi/5cy1 & :o !re=e _c accept two contradictory propositions at ! same "t1 are compell$ to make a *oice betwe5 !m4 ,huxley saw ?is :5 he said3 ,! doctr9e ( evolution is directly antagoni/ic to t ( creation4 ,evolution1 if consi/5tly accept$1 makes x impossible to believe ! ,bible4 ,:5 ,pr(essor ,s*muck]2 !re=e1 speaks ( ! creation /ory z ! poetical acc\nt ( ,g5esis2 :5 ,dr4 ,s4 ,b4 ,mees]1 ( ,croz] ,!ological ,sem9>y1 describes ! ,scriptures z ! survivals ( ! fitte/ ( ^? communion exp]i5ces :i* m51 :o h liv$ int5sely 9 ! moral int]e/1 h _h ) ,god2 :5 ,dr4 ,h4 ,c4 ,v$d]1 ( ! same sem9>y1 says ! ,scriptures grew 9 444 accuracy z !y 7 writt52 :5 ,dr4 ,w4 ,h4 ,p4 ,faunce1 ,presid5t ( ,br[n ,univ]sity1 c say3 ,mr4 ,glad/one's la/ book is call$ ,! ,impregnable ,rock ( ,holy ,scripture4 ,! v title %[s a conception ( ! ,bible at ! f>!/ remov$ f ! pres5t ,biblical s*ol>%ip1 to :i* ! ,bible is a gr[?1 n a rock2 :5 ,dr4 ,erne/ ,d4 ,burton1 ( ! ,univ]sity ( ,*icago1 says3 ,"s among u h be5 con/ra9$ to admit t ! books ( ! ,bible are n infallible 9 hi/ory or 9 matt]s ( sci5ce1 & n :olly consi/5t & !re=e n ultimately & z a :ole in]rant 9 ! field ( morals & religion2 & :5 ,dr4 ,%ail] ,ma!ws1 ( ! same ,univ]sity1 urges u to ?9k ! gospel 9 t]ms ( evolution1 & !n %[s u :at t means to him :5 he says3 ,= 9 ! ,new ,te/am5t !re are conceptions :i* ! mod]n _w "u ! dom9ance ( sci5ce at ! he>t ( :i* lies ! evolution>y philosophy f9ds x impossible to und]/&1 mu* less to believe2 ^! m5 are simply demon/rat+ ! fact t !y /ill reta9 _! intellectual integrity & consi/5cy1 & t !y are !re=e entirely unable to accept ! doctr9e ( evolution & believe 9 an in]rant ,bible at ! same "t4 ,t is1 ! logic ( ! doctr9e ( evolution de/roys = !m ! fai? t1 9 its orig9al manuscripts1 ! ,bible z x came f ,god to man 0 tru? unmix$ ) error1 ) ! result+ confid5ce t ,he :o gave x has pres]v$ x to u by ,8 provid5ce ess5tially z x 0 giv54 ,?is means t ^! m5 & all :o agree ) !m h reject$ t ,^w :i* is =ev] settl$ 9 heav51 9 ord] to accept a hypo!sis :i* is nev] settl$ on e>?2 t !y h giv5 up ! ,book :i* has /ood un*ang$ ?r\gh ! c5turies aga9/ e conceivable =m ( assault1 & tak5 9 its place a set ( sci5tific speculations t h ei!r to be revis$ or disc>d$ = new speculations e few ye>s2 t !y h turn$ f an inspir$1 in]rant & au?oritative revelation ( ,god1 & turn$ to an unprov5 !ory :i* makes ! ,bible a human docum5t1 ( supreme value1 s !y say1 z unfold+ ! religi\s evolution ( ! race1 b full ( errors because ( ! human elem5t 9 x4 ,! result ( ?is is ! s-call$ sci5tific or hi/orical me?od ( int]pret+ ! ,bible1 :i* means1 to quote ,dr4 ,mees]1 t :ile ! ,scriptures h ! wisdom ( exp]ts 9 religion1 yet au?ority is sc>cely ! t]m to describe _! value1 & may1 :5 appli$ to !m1 obscure _! real "*4 ,b :y make all ?is ado ab\t x1 say ! evolutioni/s2 x is all simply a "q ( int]pretation4 ,t is absolutely "r4 ,x is ! int]pretation ( ! evolutioni/s set 9 opposition to t ( ! ,holy ,_s2 & ! true ,*ur*1 compell$ to make a *oice1 takes t ( ! ,holy ,_s4 #b4 ,! logic ( evolution de/roys ! doctr9e ( ! fall ( man & its result 9 total depravity4 ,aft] an address some:at along ^! l9es 9 "o ( ! l>ge/ normal s*ools 9 ! _w1 ! sci5ce pr(essor said to ! writ]1 ,yes1 b y "k !re is evolution & evolution4 ,t is inde$ true4 ,we are all aw>e ( ! fact t !re are v>i\s k9ds1 %apes1 & colors ( evolution1 f !i/ic to a!i/ic2 b ! fact /ill rema9s t e !ory is /ill evolution1 & t any !ory ( evolution :atsoev]1 if x means any?+ at all1 means /eady progress f l[] to high]4 ,progress is c]ta9ly ! "o ?\ght t is vital to any def9ition ( evolution1 & progress d[nw>d is exclud$ by ! v mean+ ( ! ^w1 & s evolution "u any !ory c mean no?+ b progress upw>d4 ,b ! ,^w ( ,god says t man has gone d[n f a condition ( purity & innoc5ce into a condition ( su* s9ful enmity aga9/ ,god1 t he is n only n subject to ! law ( ,god1 b is utt]ly incapable ( br++ himself into subjection to x4 ,& ! exp]i5ce ( e ,*ri/ian gives sorr[ful b c]ta9 evid5ce to t fact4 ,?is condition ! ,bible describes z be+ dead 9 s94 ,& s9ce dea? is n dea? at all until x is total1 man1 !re=e1 be+ dead1 is totally dead--& ?is is total depravity4 ,?is means t ! only progress possible to man 9 8 natural /ate is progress 9 corruption4 ,= total depravity1 :i* is total spiritual dea?1 does n mean t ! la/ limit ( corruption has be5 rea*$1 b t :ile dea? is total1 corruption may h j begun4 ,! reality ( ! natural man's spiritual dea? is abundantly illu/rat$ 9 human hi/ory4 ,aft] man fell into s91 & di$1 he 0 giv5 fulle/ opportunity to recov] himself & to demon/rate !reby t he 0 /ill spiritually alive4 ,b ! corruption ( spiritual dea? work$ until man 0 s f> d[n 9 ! fil? ( 8 moral putrefaction t ! only way ,god c\ld save ! race f ext9ction 0 to save ! "o family t _h accept$ spiritual life f ,him1 & blot ! re/ ( ! race out 9 ! flood4 ,!n1 />t+ out aga9 "u m favorable circum/ances ?an be=e1 man w5t f bad to worse until1 9 "o great univ]sal bro!rhood1 he rose up & defi$ ,god at ! ,t[] ( ,babel1 & ,god _h to sma% ! bro!rhood into fragm5ts by ! confusion ( languages4 ,"t aft] "t ,god tri$ man & f\nd 8 progress d[nw>d always1 no matt] h[ favorable ! circum/ances t surr\nd$ him1 until f9ally he came to e>? ,himself 9 ! ,p]son ( ,8 ,son4 ,?is br\ght bo? ! reality & ! complet5ess ( man's spiritual dea? to a demon/ration t c nev] be refut$1 = at ! cross man display$1 to its et]nal uncov]+1 ! awful corruption ( t spiritual condition t c\ld n tol]ate 9 its pres5ce inc>nate purity & hol9ess1 ev5 ?\gh he _h to become ! murd]] ( ,god manife/ 9 ! fle% to get away f x4 ,ev5 9 8 wor%ip man's progress is /eadily d[nw>d4 ,beg9n+ ) ,god1 he progresses d[nw>d until he is wor%ipp+ birds1 !n bea/s1 & !n creep+ ?+s4 ,b evolution says t man is com+ up f primitive conditions into full] life4 ,& s ! evolutioni/ _c tol]ate su* doctr9es z ^! :i* ! ,^w ( ,god sets =?4 ,to a consi/5t evolutioni/1 man is n spiritually dead1 = t w\ld make progress out ( ! "q4 ,& if progress upw>d is d5i$--if ! only progress possible to ! natural man is progress 9 corruption1 !n ! :ole doctr9e ( evolution is gone4 ,?is is :y x becomes necess>y = ,canon ,e4 ,w4 ,b>nes1 ( ,we/m9/] ,abbey1 :5 he accepts evolution1 to reject ! ,bible4 ,he says3 ,! inevitable acceptance ( evolution means giv+ up belief 9 ! fall & 9 all ! !ology built ^u x by ! !ologians f ,/4 ,paul onw>d4 ,man 0 n made p]fect & !n m>r$2 8 evolution is /ill proce$+4 ,s "h aga9 x is utt]ly impossible = ! consi/5t evolutioni/ to accept ! ,bible doctr9e ( ! fall ( man4 #c4 ,! logic ( evolution de/roys ! doctr9e ( s94 ,! ,bible makes man's fall delib]ate & wilful1 & 8 cont9u$ attitude ( s9ful enmity aga9/ ,god1 9 spite ( all ,god's (f]$ p[] to *ange x into love1 "o ( excuseless lawlessness & rebellion4 ,?is makes man entirely responsible = 8 s9 & acc\ntable to ,god = ev]y?+ s9 does 9 8 life4 ,& s ! ,bible says3 ,e "o %all give acc\nt ( himself to ,god4 ,& ^? :o g out ( ?is life 9 ! unconfess$ & !re=e un=giv5 s9 ( reject+ ,god's m]cy 9 ,*ri/ %all g away into ev]la/+ puni%m5t1 :]e !re w be weep+ & gna%+ ( tee?4 ,b to ! evolution>y philosophy1 s9 _c be exce$+ s9ful1 = x is ei!r inh]5t 9 ! process ( evolution1 or1 at wor/1 b an un=tunate slip 9 ! work+ out ( t process1 if1 inde$1 x is n ev5 a m>k ( budd+ virtue4 ,john ,fiske says3 ,!ology has mu* to say ab\t orig9al s94 ,?is orig9al s9 is nei!r m nor less ?an ! brute inh]itance t e man c>ries ) him4 ,rev4 ,dwight ,bradley1 a ,clevel&1 ,ohio1 pa/or1 says3 ,!re is no escape = intellig5t p today f ! acceptance ( ! law ( evolution4444 ,x foll[s t :at we call evil s9 is ! rema9s ( a l[] =m ( life4444 ,we are 9 ! mid/ ( ! sl[ process ( ridd+ ourselves ( our animal inh]itance4 ,& ,dr4 ,%ail] ,ma!ws foll[s ! evolution>y philosophy to its logical & necess>y end :5 he says3 ,b = m5 :o ?9k ( ,god z dynamically imm95t 9 an inf9ite univ]se1 :o ?9k ( man's relation to ,him z det]m9$ n by /atutory b by cosmic law1 :o reg>d s9 & righte\sness alike z ! work+ out ( ! fundam5tal =ces ( life itself1 ! conception ( ,god z ,k+ & ( man z condemn$ or acquitt$ subject is b a figure ( spee*4 ,su* a doctr9e z ?is absolutely & =ev] de/roys man's responsibility = s94 ,= if s9 is :at ,dr4 ,ma!ws sugge/s x is1--! work+ out ( ! fundam5tal =ces ( life itself1--!n x is inh]5t 9 man's natural con/itution z a process ( 8 evolution4 ,& if ?is is s1 man is 9 no way responsible = 8 s94 ,?is altoge!r removes man's acc\ntability to ,god1 = he _c be br\ght to acc\nt = t :i* is ! work+ out ( ! fundam5tal =ces ( life itself1 & :i* is !re=e inevitable 9 ! v work+s ( 8 nature4 ,& ev5 if s9 is an un=tunate slip 9 ! process ( evolution1 man _c be held acc\ntable = an accid5t4 ,?is doctr9e also puts a high premium on ! :ole bea/ly1 selfi%1 lu/ful1 murd]\s hi/ory ( ! race1 = x makes s9 a ladd] up :i* man is climb+ to 8 high de/9y4 ,puni%m5t = s9 is !re=e absolutely out ( ! "q4 ,= if man is n responsible = 8 s91 & if ,god puni%es him = x1 z ! ,bible says ,he w1 ev5 by ! law ( cause & effect1 t w\ld make ,god an inf9ite tyrant & an unspeakable fi5d4 ,& s if ,god is n a mon/]1 & if evolution is true1 !re is no puni%m5t = s91 & ! ,bible lies4 ,?9k+ m5 see t ?is is ! inevitable logic ( ! doctr9e ( evolution4 ,sir ,j4 ,william ,dawson1 speak+ ( ! evolution>y doctr9es z speculations1 says3 ,!y seek to revolutionize ! religi\s beliefs ( ! _w1 & if accept$ w\ld de/roy mu* ( ! exi/+ !ology & philosophy4444 ,) "o class ( m9ds !y con/itute a sort ( religion4444 ,) ano!r & p]haps l>g] class1 !y are accept$ z af=d+ a welcome deliv]ance f all scruples ( consci5ce & fe>s ( a h]eaft]4 ,! !ory ( evolution _c be consi/5tly held & ! /atem5ts ( ! ,bible conc]n+ s9 & its consequ5ces be accept$ at ! same "t4 ,& s ! evolutioni/ w come1 soon] or lat]1 to refuse any mean+ to ,scripture /atem5ts conc]n+ s91 z did ,dr4 ,w4 ,n4 ,cl>ke1 :5 he said3 ,we h no hi/orical n>rative ( ! beg9n+ ( s91 & !ology receives f ! ,scriptures no record ( t beg9n+4 ,t is1 ! p]fectly pla9 & easily und]/ood /atem5ts ( ,scripture conc]n+ ! beg9n+ ( s9 are altoge!r unhi/orical & utt]ly unwor?y ( cr$5ce to ! man :o looks at ! ,bible f ! sci5tific or hi/orical /&po9t1 :i* is ! evolutioni/'s me?od ( h&l+ ! ,^w ( ,god4 ,to accept evolution1 !re=e1 is to discr$it ! ,bible4 #d4 ,! logic ( evolution de/roys ! doctr9es ( ! ,deity & ! virg9 bir? ( ! ,"l ,jesus ,*ri/4 ,! ,bible makes ,*ri/ ! ,se$ ( ! woman1 n ( ! man1 z all o!r human be+s are2 x makes ,8 conception to h be5 t ( ! ,holy ,_s2 x decl>es ,8 virg9 bir? 9 language t _c be misund]/ood2 x makes ,him ! ,son ( ,god1 n ! son ( ,joseph4 ,x also makes ,him ,god tab]nacl+ 9 ! fle%2 x makes ,him ! ,second ,p]son ( ! ,triune ,god2 x decl>es 9 s _m words t ,he is ,god4 ,b evolution _c accept su* a doctr9e1 & s ! evolutioni/ juggles ! ,scripture /atem5ts ( ,8 ,deity & d5ies ,8 virg9 bir?1 mak+ ,him a ,jewi% ba/>d1 born out ( w$lock1 & /a9$ =ev] ) ! %ame ( ,8 "m's immorality4 ,dr4 ,a4 ,c4 ,mc,giffert says ( ,*ri/1 t ,he is no m div9e ?an we are1 or ?an nature is4 ,a magaz9e article on ,! ,cosmic ,com+ ( ! ,*ri/ says3 ,fir/ ! little scum on ! w>m1 /agnant wat]1 !n ! little colonies ( cells1 ! organisms1 ! gre5 moss & li*51 ! beauty ( vegetation1 ! movem5t ( %ell fi%1 sponges1 jelly fi%1 worms1 crabs1 trilobites1 c5tip$es1 insects1 fi%1 frogs1 liz>ds1 d9osaurs1 reptile birds1 birds1 kang>oos1 ma/odons1 de]1 apes1 primitive man1 cave man1 man ( ! /one age1 ( e>lie/ hi/ory1 ,abraham's migration1 ! ,exodus1 ! developm5t ( ! ,jewi% religi\s life & ! climax 9 t pure/ ( maid5s1 ,m>y ( ,naz>e?4 ,! h\r _h come = ! dawn ( a new day1 & ! light ( t new day 0 ! bir? ( ,jesus4 ,! et]nal purpose ( ! ages 0 n[ to be made cle>1 & ! long1 long aeons ( creation expla9$4 ,x is no wond] t aft] quot+ ^! words ! ,sunday ,s*ool ,times exclaims3 ,9 o!r words1 )\t moss we c\ld n h _h ,m>y2 )\t an ape we c\ld n h _h ,abraham2 &--%ock+ blasphemy--)\t a c5tip$e we c\ld n h _h ,*ri/6 ,praise ,god1 we may turn f ?is to ! words ( ,god2 ,= x is writt51 ,i w de/roy ! wisdom ( ! wise1 & ! disc]nm5t ( ! disc]n+ ,i w br+ to naught4 ,& s "h once m ! consi/5t evolutioni/ is compell$ to reject ! ,bible by d5y+ ! doctr9es ( ! ,deity & ! virg9 bir? ( ,*ri/4 #e4 ,! logic ( evolution de/roys ! doctr9e ( atonem5t by sub/itution4 ,! ,bible says3 ,)\t ! %$d+ ( blood !re is no remission ( s94 ,him :o knew no s9 ,he ha? made to be s9 = u4 ,! ,"l ha? laid on ,him ! iniquity ( u all4 ,:o ,himself bore our s9s 9 ,8 own body on ! tree4 ,we 7 r$eem$ 444 ) ! preci\s blood ( ,*ri/4 ,we are ju/ifi$ by ,8 blood4 ,! blood ( ,jesus ,*ri/ ,8 ,son cleanse? u f all s94 ,^! & _m o!r /atem5ts make ,*ri/'s dea? "o ( atonem5t by sub/itution = our s9s4 ,b evolution _c tol]ate su* a doctr9e4 ,to ! evolutioni/ ?is is a doctr9e ( ! %ambles1 a slaught] h\se religion1 a gospel ( gore4 ,*ri/'s dea? is r a revelation ( ! evolutioni/'s conception ( div9e love1 & an example ( sacrificial s]vice set be=e /ruggl+ man to help him climb4 ,let ^? :o believe 9 ! evolutioni/'s hi/orical me?od ( int]pret+ ,scripture speak = !mselves4 ,dr4 ,g]ald ,birney ,smi?1 ( ! ,univ]sity ( ,*icago1 says3 ,to insi/ dogmatically1 z an priori pr9ciple1 t )\t ! %$d+ ( blood !re is no remission ( s91 is bo? fooli% & futile 9 an age t has ab&on$ ! conception ( bloody sacrifice & :i* is l\dly dem&+ ! abolition ( capital puni%m5t4 ,dr4 ,walt] ,raus*5bus* said3 ,:at ! dea? ( ,jesus n[ does = u1 ! dea? ( ! prophets did = him4 ,dr4 ,h4 ,c4 ,v$d] says3 ,jesus nev] taught & nev] au?oriz$ anybody to tea* 9 8 "n t he suff]$ 9 our /ead & bore ! p5alty ( our s9s2 & also3 ,! "o cr[n+ absurdity ( !ology is t ! p5alty ( an evil de$ c be vic>i\sly borne by ano!r :ile he goes scot free1 :i* he describes 9 ano!r place z tak+ an immunity ba? 9 ! f\nta9 fill$ ) blood4 ,& ,dr4 ,j4 ,h4 ,c(f91 ( ,e>lham ,college1 ,e>lham1 ,indiana1 says3 ,! sacrificial life ( ,jesus is ! ess5tial factor 9 ,8 atonem5t4 ,8 pr9ciples & example are ! way ( ! individual & society to ,god4 ,su* /atem5ts make x p]fectly evid5t t ^? :o accept evolution utt]ly reject ,god's provision = salvation ?r\gh ! %$ blood ( ,*ri/ z an atonem5t by sub/itution = our s9s4 #f4 ,! logic ( evolution de/roys ! doctr9e ( reg5]ation4 ,! ,bible describes man z dead to ,god & runn+ away f ,him2 z hav+ a nature s full ( corruption t ,f ! sole ( ! foot ev5 unto ! head !re is no s\ndness 9 x1 b w\nds1 & bruises1 & putrify+ sores2 & z hav+ a "* 9 ! grip ( su* enmity aga9/ ,god t by nature he loves d>kness r ?an light4 ,?is indicates t man is pa/ improvem5t 9 8 natural /ate1 = no improvem5t is possible 9 ! dead4 ,! ,bible !re=e speaks1 n ( ! improvem5t1 b ( ! burial1 ( ! old life1 & ( resurrection1 by ! p[] ( a new nature1 to newness ( life4 ,he> :at x says3 ,we 7 buri$ ) ,*ri/ by baptism into dea?1 t l z ,*ri/ 0 rais$ up f ! dead by ! glory ( ! ,fa!r1 ev5 s we also %\ld walk 9 newness ( life4 ,!re is a l>ge section ( ! ,*ur* t und]/& ?is passage to ref] to imm]sion 9 wat] 9 confession ( fai? 9 ,*ri/4 ,n t !y believe t imm]sion has any?+ to d ) sav+ u1 = !y d n1 b t x is ! div9ely appo9t$ symbol or picture ( ! salvation t has already become a reality 9 ! life4 ,to an imm]sioni/1 !re=e1 :5 a believ] is buri$ ) ,*ri/ 9 symbol 9 8 baptism1 & rais$ aga9 9 symbol ( resurrection1 he confesses1 among o!r ?+s1 t by 8 fir/ bir? he is s completely dead t !re is no?+ left to d ) him b to bury him1 & 8 will+ness to be buri$ 9 ! grave ( ,*ri/ has be5 met by ,god ) ! gift ( ! ris5 & incorruptible life :i* is 9 ,8 ,son1 & by :i* he is n[ enabl$ to walk 9 newness ( life4 ,& s an imm]sioni/ _c be a consi/5t evolutioni/4 ,= :5 an evolutioni/ is imm]s$1 he is ei!r p]petrat+ a mean+less trave/y on imm]sion1 or else he is d5y+ ! :ole doctr9e ( evolution4 ,= imm]sion c]ta9ly does n picture a /ep 9 ! progress ( ! liv+1 b r ! burial ( ! totally dead4 ,imm]s+ *ur*es t h gone ov] to ! evolution>y position %\ld !re=e be consi/5t & nail up _! bapti/ries4 ,b ano!r l>ge portion ( ! ,*ur* believe t ! above passage does n ref] to imm]sion 9 wat]1 b r to ! /atem5t3 ,= by "o ,_s h we all be5 baptiz$ into "o body4 ,!y reg>d x z ref]r+ to ! inw>d1 spiritual union ) ,*ri/ :i* takes place 9 ! new bir?1 r ?an to an outw>d act4 ,= 9 ! mom5t ( reg5]ation1 e believ] is baptiz$ by ! ,holy ,_s into ! ,body ( ,*ri/4 ,b ev5 s1 ! ^w buri$ /ill /&s 9 ! fir/ passage above1 & a burial has to d ) ! dead1 n ) ! liv+4 ,be+ buri$1 !re=e1 :5 ! ,holy ,_s baptizes u into ,*ri/1 x is into dea?1 n into an enl>g+ life1 because we are s completely dead t ! baptiz+ ,_s sets ! old man =ev] aside z utt]ly unimprovable1 9 ord] t ,he may make u p>tak]s ( ! div9e nature by :i* we become a new creation 9 ,*ri/4 ,all ?is1 h[ev]1 is utt]ly intol]able to ! consi/5t evolutioni/4 ,= if man is dead & !re=e unimprovable1 t makes progress upw>d impossible1 &1 if t is impossible1 ! :ole doctr9e ( evolution is at an end4 ,& s ! evolutioni/ assumes ! pres5ce ( life1 & conceives ! race to be progress+ upw>d out ( crude =ms & une?ical conceptions t[>d ,god4 ,x is p]fectly consi/5t1 !re=e1 t he %\ld seek to /ir man's noble aspirations & %\ld pres5t high ideals = him to /rive aft]4 ,= x is n life man ne$s1 !y say1 x is simply conv]sion to high] ideals & aspirations 9 life4 ,h5ce ,dr4 ,e4 ,d4 ,burton is 9 p]fect h>mony ) ?is evolution>y conception :5 he says3 ,jesus 0 a tea*] ( great pr9ciples1 :i* x is incumb5t ^u u to apply to ! multitud9\s phases & exp]i5ces ( life1 & ! embodim5t ( an ideal1 :i* x is ours to endeavor1 z be/ we c1 to a*ieve4 ,dr4 ,h]b]t ,l4 ,willett1 ( ! ,univ]sity ( ,*icago1 0 also 9 h>mony ) all ?is :5 he said 9 an address he>d by ! writ]3 ,x is ! task ( ! ,*ur* to int]pret to ! _w ! ideals ( ,jesus = m5 to /rive aft]4 ,& ,dr4 ,j4 ,h4 ,c(f9 also voic$ ! evolution>y position :51 9 speak+ ( conv]sion1 he said3 ,x is conv]sion to some?+1 namely1 ! pr9ciples ( ,jesus4 ,n[ :5 ! logic ( ?is conception is foll[$ out1 x turns evangelism into religi\s education4 ,& s x is easy to see :y ! advocates ( evolution are /ress+ religi\s education ) increas+ insi/5ce4 ,= x is ?r\gh ! me?ods ( religi\s education1 accord+ to ,dr4 ,burton1 t ! lo/ are be+ l$ to adopt ! pr9ciples ( ,jesus & to accept 8 lead]%ip quietly & gradually4 ,?is makes reg5]ation simply an add$ impulse 9 ! direction 9 :i* m5 are imag9$ already to be go+4 ,x also has ! effect ( altoge!r rev]s+ ! emphasis 9 ! "w ( ! ,*ur* ) ! lo/4 ,accord+ to ,dr4 ,burton1 x transf]s x f ! salvation ( ! individual1 ) emphasis ^u rescue f future woe1 to ! creation ( a human society dom9at$ by ! _s ( ,jesus4 ,& ,dr4 ,g]ald ,birney ,smi?1 speak+ ( pres5t-day mission>y me?ods1 says3 ,humanly det]m9$ programs are be+ sub/itut$ = dogmatic decrees 9 ! "w ( ! *ur*es4 ,?is is g5u9e democracy4 ,! mission>y ent]prise is rapidly be+ conceiv$ z a democratic social program r ?an z ! rescue ( a few individuals f ! div9e wra?4444 ,education is com+ to be a prim>y means ( accompli%+ ! mission>y task4 ,su* a mission to ! lo/ w\ld be altoge!r un?9kable if m5 7 believ$ to be spiritually dead4 ,= dead m5 are helpless to adopt pr9ciples & /rive aft] ideals4 ,dead m5 d n ne$ education1 !y ne$ life4 ,any "o ( av]age intellig5ce c see at a glance t ^! two programs ( salvation are head$ 9 opposite directions4 ,by "o we /rive aft] an ideal2 by ! o!r we quit all /riv+ & surr5d] to a ,p]son4 ,"o is salvation by a human resolution to press t[>d ! patt]n set be=e u by ! ,fl[] ( ! ,race2 ! o!r is salvation by a div9e rescue f t natural hatr$ ( purity & hol9ess :i* made possible ! murd] ( ! ,son ( ,god4 ,by "o program we adopt ! pr9ciples & foll[ ! _s ( ! life ( ,*ri/2 by ! o!r we tru/ 9 ! m]its ( ! %$ blood & sub/itution>y dea? ( ,*ri/4 ,^! two programs are mutually exclusive4 ,?us ! evolution>y philosophy utt]ly de/roys ! doctr9e ( ! new bir?4 #g4 ,! logic ( evolution de/roys ! doctr9e ( ! hol9ess ( ,god1 = x makes ,god ! au?or ( s94 ,le ,conte says3 ,if evolution be true1 & especially if man be inde$ a product ( evolution1 !n :at we call evil is n a unique ph5om5on conf9$ to man & ! result ( an accid5t ! fall1 b mu/ be a great fact p]vad+ all nature & a "p ( its v con/itution4 ,no ?9k+ man c get away f t conclusion4 ,= if evolution 9 any =m is a fact1 !n ! ?+ ! ,bible calls s9 0 ei!r someh[ emb$d$1 by a compet5t & responsible ,creator1 9 man's v con/itution z a necess>y process ( 8 evolution1 or else x slipp$ into ! race ?r\gh ! bungl+ & unwat*ful incompet5ce ( an impot5t ,creator4 ,?us 9 ei!r case ,god becomes ! au?or ( s96 ,?is puts evolution almo/1 if n altoge!r1 on ! gr\nd ( blasphemy6 ,god responsible = ! unspeakable woe & ! unmeasur$ suff]+ ( man8 ,god ! au?or ( t inh]5t =ce 9 man's nature :i* has fill$ ! e>? ) hatr$1 viol5ce1 blood%$1 & dea?8 ,let him ?9k s :o c6 ,aft] ^! doctr9es ( ! ,^w are set beside ! evolution>y philosophy1 & aft] x beg9s to dawn on ! ?9k+ m9d h[ utt]ly irreconcilable !y are1 ! absolute impossibility ( a consi/5t evolutioni/ believ+ 9 an inspir$1 in]rant1 & infallible ,bible becomes well nigh an axiom4 ,x is no wond] t ,dr4 ,w4 ,b4 ,riley exclaims3 ,:at ?9k+ man fails to see ! inf9ity ( space betwe5 ,mod]nism & ,or?odoxy1 or to appreh5d ! fact t daily !y are draw+ f>!r ap>t6 ,"t holds no promise ( ev5 a pat*$-up peace4 ,"l ,kelv9 0 a/oni%$ at ! prea*]s & tea*]s :o are try+ to apply ! doctr9e ( evolution to ! fundam5tals ( ! fai?4 ,he said3 ,i m>vel at ! undue ha/e ) :i* tea*]s 9 our ,univ]sities & prea*]s 9 our pulpits are re/at+ ! tru? 9 ! t]ms ( evolution1 :ile evolution itself rema9s an unprov5 hypo!sis 9 ! laboratories ( sci5ce4 ,& well might he m>vel4 ,& well might ! ,*ur* become ar\s$ & al>m$ z ! logical work+s ( ^! false doctr9es produce m & m fe>ful results )9 h] ranks4 ,! :ole ,*ur* is be+ mov$ away f ! f\ndations ( ! fai?1 & ?is false philosophy is at ! bottom ( x all4 ,! gr\p ann\ncem5ts ( ! ,sunday s]vices ( ! ,los ,angeles lib]al *ur*es %[ :]e all consi/5t evolutioni/s are head$4 ,/&+ at ! head ( ^! ann\ncem5ts are ^! words1 ! capital lett]s be+ !irs3 ,we f\nd our fai? on ! ?\ght ( ,,evolution r ?an ,special ,creation2 on revelation ?r\gh ,,normal ,,human ,,exp]i5ce r ?an ! sup]natural2 on salvation ?r\gh ,,gr[? r ?an a miracul\s rebir?4 ,& :5 x comes to ! awful h>ve/ t is be+ ga!r$ f our *ur*es = ! =ces ( spiritual de/ruction ?r\gh our colleges & univ]sities1 ,william ,j5n+s ,bryan has _h "s in=mation giv5 to him t w give u a h9t ( :at is go+ on4 ,he says3 ,hav+ _h opportunity to make a p]sonal inve/igation1 ,i feel x my duty to w>n ! lov]s ( ! ,bible ( ! insidi\s attacks :i* are be+ made ^u e vital "p ( ! ,^w ( ,god4 ,a fa!r tells me ( a daught] educat$ at ,wellesley :o calmly in=ms him t no "o believes 9 ! ,bible n[2 a tea*] 9 ,columbia ,univ]sity beg9s 8 lessons 9 geology by ask+ /ud5ts to lay aside all t !y h le>n$ 9 ,sunday-s*ool2 a pr(essor ( ! ,univ]sity ( ,wiscons9 tells 8 class t ! ,bible is a collection ( my?s2 a pr(essor ( philosophy at ,ann ,arbor occupies a ,sunday ev5+ expla9+ to an audi5ce t ,*ri/ianity is a /ate ( m9d & t !re are only two books 9 ! ,bible ) any lit]>y m]it2 ano!r pr(essor 9 ! same in/itution in=ms /ud5ts t he once taught a ,sunday-s*ool class & 0 active 9 ! ,"y ,m5's ,*ri/ian ,association1 b t no ?9k+ man c believe 9 ,god or ! ,bible2 a woman tea*] 9 a public s*ool 9 ,indiana rebukes a boy = answ]+ t ,adam 0 ! fir/ man1 expla9+ to him & ! class t ! tree man 0 ! fir/ man2 a "y man 9 ,s\? ,c>ol9a traces 8 a!ism back to two tea*]s 9 a ,*ri/ian college2 a s5ior 9 an ,ill9ois high s*ool writes t he became skeptical dur+ 8 sophomore ye> b has be5 br\ght back by influ5ces outside ( s*ool :ile o!rs ( 8 class are agno/ics2 a pr(essor 9 ,yale has ! reputation ( mak+ a!i/s ( all :o come "u 8 influ5ce--?is in=mation 0 giv5 by a boy ^: bro!r has come "u ! influ5ce ( ?is tea*]2 a pr(essor 9 ,bryn ,mawr combats ,*ri/ianity = a session & !n puts to 8 class ! "q :e!r or n !re is a ,god1 & is happy to f9d t a majority ( ! class vote t !re is no ,god2 a pr(essor 9 a ,*ri/ian college writes a book 9 :i* ! virg9 bir? ( ,*ri/ is disput$2 "o pr(essor decl>es t life is m]ely a by-product & w ultimately be produc$ 9 ! laboratory2 ano!r says t ! +r$i5ts necess>y to create life h already be5 br\ght toge!r & t life w be develop$ f ^! +r$i5ts1 add+1 h[ev]1 t x w require a million ye>s to d x4 ,^! are a few ( ! illu/rations furni%$ by in=mants :om ,i h reason to believe4 ,^! facts c]ta9ly furni% suffici5t reason :y ! ,*ur* _c compromise ) ! evolution>y philosophy4 ,to d s w\ld be to head h]self t[>d de/ruction4 ,%e mu/ /& uncompromis$ & unfl9*+ aga9/ t unprov5 & discr$it$ !ory1 ! acceptance ( :i* de/roys fai? 9 t infallible & in]rant ,^w on :i* %e 0 f\nd$1 & on ^: ?us sai? ! ,"l %e mu/ re/ h] message to a lo/ _w4 ,!re is no middle gr\nd4 ,to compromise w\ld be to commit suicide4 ,if ! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools are ev] to come into h>mony1 x _c be because ! ,*ur* gives up an infallible ,book & accepts a discr$it$ !ory 9 its place1 & s x mu/ be because ! ,s*ools give up ?is unsci5tific1 because unprov51 !ory & get back to fai? 9 ! in]rant ,^w ( ,god4 ,t ?is is ! only basis on :i* ! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools c ev] come into h>mony is /r5u\sly d5i$ by ! evolutioni/s 9 bo? ,s*ools & ,*ur*4 ,b _! d5ial is mean+less :5 x is rememb]$ t !y are work+ night & day to capture ! ,*ur*1 z !y h already almo/ done ) ! ,s*ools1 be=e we wake up to :at is go+ on4 ,b x c nev] be done4 ,! true ,*ur* w nev] surr5d] to ^? :o w\ld remove h] f\ndations & wreck h] message4 ,,*apt] ,,ii ,! ,pres5t ,controv]sy--! ,cure ,9 ! previ\s pages we w5t back to ! cause ( ! pres5t controv]sy betwe5 ! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools4 ,we f\nd t ! unprov5 & discr$it$ !ory ( evolution lies at ! bottom ( x4 ,we also conclud$ t no compromise t p]mits entrance to ?is !ory 9 any =m is possible1 = ! tru? :i* is at once bo? ! life & ! message ( ! ,*ur*1 & ! !ory ( evolution1 are mutually exclusive4 ,9 ?is *apt] we w seek to f9d ! cure = ?is di/ress+ controv]sy4 ,t !re is a cure is beyond all possible "q4 ,& if x is n f\nd & appli$1 ! controv]sy _c fail to int5sify until x may =ce a re-alignm5t 9 ! ,*ur*--a ?+ a great company ( ! mo/ e>ne/ 9 ! ,*ur* are fight+ to prev5t4 ,n[ ! only possible basis on :i* bo? ! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools c take _! /&1 if ?is controv]sy is to be settl$ )\t f9al disunion 9 ! ,*ur*1 0 laid d[n by ,*ri/ 9 t sci5tific =mula3 ,if any man wille? to d ,8 w1 he %all "k ( ! tea*+1 :e!r x be ( ,god1 or :e!r ,i speak f ,myself4 ,to foll[ ?is =mula 9 our se>* = common gr\nd is to be utt]ly sci5tific1 = x is ! laboratory me?od ( exp]im5t4 ,! true ,*ur* has always believ$ & receiv$ ! ,bible z ! in]rant ,^w ( ,god1 n because1 9 bl9d cr$ulity1 %e has foll[$ "s irrational & unsci5tific impulse1 b precisely because %e has be5 sci5tific en\gh to "w by ?is =mula & c>ry ! laboratory te/ to its f9al analysis4 ,& = ! ,s*ools to foll[ ?is same =mula ) sci5tific accuracy w\ld be = !m to arrive at ! same place at :i* ! true ,*ur* has arriv$4 ,= :5 ! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools />t out 9 se>* ( tru? & d n arrive toge!r1 x is ei!r because !y did n />t toge!r1 or because "o or bo? ( !m did n proce$ all ! way ) sci5tific exactness4 ,tru? is an et]nal unity1 & conclusions reg>d+ x t are mutually exclusive & !re=e ! cause ( controv]sy prove to a demon/ration t somebody's me?ods ( inve/igation 7 unsci5tific4 ,if we really int5d to be sci5tific1 !re=e1 :5 we />t out to inve/igate tru? ( any sort & 9 any realm1 ! fir/ ?+ we w d w be to classify4 ,we c nei!r />t nor proce$ toge!r unless we d4 ,inde$1 if we are to be sci5tific en\gh to foll[ ! =mula laid d[n by ,*ri/1 we w be compell$ to classify be=e we c ev5 beg9 our inve/igation4 ,!re=e-- ,i4 ,tru? ,mu/ ,be ,classifi$ ,sci5tifically4 #a4 ,! ,realms ( ,tru? ,mu/ ,be ,classifi$4 ,! fir/ ?+ ! true sci5ti/ does is to classify tru? into realms4 ,?is we h already done by classify+ ! realm 9 :i* ,god reveals ,8 moral "* to ! he>ts ( all moral be+s z ! spiritual realm1 & t 9 :i* ,he reveals ,8 creative p[] to ! m9ds ( all intellig5t be+s z ! natural realm4 ,if we d n di/+ui% ^! realms to />t )1 we invite confusion2 & if we %\ld rea* "r conclusions )\t ?is classification1 x w\ld be due to accid5t1 r ?an to sci5tific accuracy4 ,b t ?is classification is univ]sally recogniz$ is prov$ by ! fact t ! mom5t sci5ce rea*es ! l9e :]e ! natural ends & ! spiritual beg9s1 x pursues its inve/igations no f>!r1 on ! gr\nd t x has nei!r ! implem5ts nor ! capacities ) :i* to inve/igate 9 t realm4 ,?is proves z conclusively z any?+ c\ld t ! di/9ction betwe5 ^! two realms is s %>p1 z well z s self-evid5t1 t sci5ce is compell$ to accept x & act accord+ly4 #b4 ,! ,faculties ( ,inve/igation ,mu/ be ,di/+ui%$4 ,! sci5tific man w next di/+ui% ! faculties ) :i* ! inve/igat+ is to be done1 accord+ to ! respective realms4 ,t ?is classification is requir$ by ! fundam5tal diff]5ce 9 ! nature ( ! tru?s 9 ^! two realms is s self-evid5t t x ought to be axiomatic to all :o ?9k ) any degree ( sci5tific accuracy4 ,= 9 ! nature ( ?+s1 natural tru? requires inve/igation by intellectual faculties1 & spiritual tru? by spiritual faculties4 ,inde$1 ?is di/9ction is fully recogniz$ :5 sci5ce halts its pursuit ( tru? at ! b\nd>y l9e ( ! spiritual realm4 ,yet1 al?\gh ?is classification is !oretically recogniz$ by sci5ce1 & al?\gh x is absolutely dem&$ if we are to proce$ sci5tifically 9 our rese>*es 9 ! spiritual realm1 x is little less ?an amaz+ h[ _m !re are :o utt]ly fail to di/+ui% ^! faculties :5 !y />t out to inve/igate spiritual tru?4 ,inde$1 ?is is ! fir/ place :]e ! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools "p company4 ,= ! :ole attitude ( our ,s*ools today1 includ+ mo/ ( ! in/itutions f\nd$ & fo/]$ by ! ,*ur*1 seems to be "o t entirely misses ! sci5tific necessity ( di/+ui%+ betwe5 ^! ess5tially diff]5t faculties :5 work+ 9 ^! two utt]ly div]g5t realms ( tru?4 ,& s x comes to pass t :ile ! ,*ur* is us+ "o sort ( faculties1 ! ,s*ools are us+ ano!r k9d on ! same class ( tru?4 ,x ne$s sc>cely to be argu$ t ! intellect1 ) its capacity to reason1 is ! prop] faculty ( appreh5sion 9 ! sci5tific realm4 ,b x is equally true t ! he>t1 ) its capacity to believe1 is ! "o faculty ( appreh5sion 9 ! spiritual realm4 ,t is1 ! inquir] reasons 8 way to k 9 ! natural realm1 & believes 8 way to k 9 ! spiritual realm4 ,he uses 8 m9d 9 ord] to und]/& :at ,god has done 9 ,8 creation1 & he ex]cises fai? 9 ord] to come into ! k ( :at ,he is 9 ,8 "*4 ,9 natural ?+s he believes because he und]/&s1 & 9 spiritual ?+s he und]/&s because he believes4 ,9 draw+ ?is contra/ betwe5 m9d & he>t1 h[ev]1 x is fully recogniz$ t ! t]m he>t1 9 mu* if n all ( ,scripture1 /&s = ! :ole p]sonality1 includ+ intellect1 emotion & w4 ,b x is also a fact t ?is t]m /&s = t c]ta9 attitude ( ! :ole p]sonality t[>d ,god ?r\gh ,8 ,^w 9 :i* "o believes & receives ,8 ,^w )\t "q1 ev5 ?\gh x may n be und]/ood1 r ?an insi/+ on und]/&+ x 9 ord] to believe x4 ,paul says by inspiration 9 ,fir/ ,cor9?ians #a3ag to #b3af t m5tal capacity1 ev5 ( ! highe/ excell5ce1 :5 ex]cis$ by itself1 is utt]ly incapable ( appreh5d+ spiritual tru? 9 any degree :atev]4 ,& ,*ri/ says t x is ) ! he>t t man believes unto righte\sness4 ,?is def9es t attitude ( ! :ole p]sonality :i* accepts ! ,^w ( ,god on fai? )\t necess>ily und]/&+ x1 & :i* gives evid5ce ( acceptance by su* a :ole-he>t$ surr5d] to x z w ev5tuate 9 a life ( righte\sness4 ,!n 9 o!r ,scriptures we f9d t a life ( righte\sness1 accord+ to ! div9e /&>d1 is bas$ on "r relations ) ,god 9 ,*ri/ ?r\gh fai? 9 ,8 %$ blood1 ?r\gh ^: incom+ & indwell+ life1 9 response to su* a fai?1 ! "o :o receives x w normally live 9 "r relations ) 8 fell[ m54 ,t is1 x is a righte\sness t is obta9$ by believ+1 n atta9$ by work+4 ,x is receiv$1 n a*iev$4 ,! use ( ! t]m he>t1 !re=e1 9 ,scripture1 means t c]ta9 attitude ( ! :ole p]sonality t[>d ,god ?r\gh ,8 ,^w :i* ! ex]cise ( ! intellect ap>t f1 & unf\nd$ on1 fai? makes impossible4 ,x is precisely ?is di/9ction 9 faculties t ,*ri/'s =mula requires4 ,= x 0 spiritual tru?1 n natural1 ( :i* ,he spoke :5 ,he said1 ,if any man wills to d1 he %all "k4 ,to "w by ?is =mula requires ! ex]cise ( fai?4 ,= fai? is t attitude ( ! he>t t[>d ! do+ ( ,god's w :i* is evid5c$ 9 will+ to d t w1 no matt] :at x co/s nor :]e x leads4 ,?is is ! fir/ /ep ( fai?4 ,= fai? is bo? an attitude & an act1 ! g5u95ess ( :i* is prov5 by an activity4 ,t is1 x is an attitude ( will+ness t[>d ! w ( ,god1 an act ( surr5d] to ! w ( ,god1 ev5tuat+ 9 an activity 9 cont9u+ 9 ! w ( ,god4 ,!re=e complete surr5d] ( ! he>t & life to ,god's w z reveal$ 9 ! ,^w1 tru/+ ! outcome to ,him1 is :]e fai? beg9s4 ,& s let no man imag9e t he has any real fai? ei!r 9 ,god or ,8 ,^w :o has n begun by will+ to d1 t he may ent] ^u ! do+ (1 ! w ( ,god4 ,inde$1 ?is is n simply ! place :]e fai? beg9s1 x is also ! only place :]e ! pres5ce ( fai? c be demon/rat$4 ,= ?is is ! only possible way ( di/+ui%+ t intellectual attitude :i* simply ass5ts to ! tru?fulness ( ! ,^w1 f t g5u9e he>t fai? :i* actively reckons ! ,^w to be true by surr5d]+ ! life to its requirem5ts4 ,?is =mula ( ,*ri/'s1 !re=e1 n only requires t ! spiritual & natural faculties be di/+ui%$1 b x is ! "o sci5tific te/ by :i* !y c be di/+ui%$4 ,!n !re is ,paul's classification ( ^! faculties j ref]r$ to4 ,x is pass+ /range t s _m ev5 9 our d5om9ational s*ools h miss$ x4 ,he devotes a :ole section ( ,fir/ ,cor9?ians1 f #a3ag to #b3af1 z not$ above1 to a sci5tific /atem5t ( ! natural & total incapacity ( ! intellect to disc]n spiritual tru?4 ,consid] x a little m 9 detail4 ,he says t natural human wisdom1 sophia1 :i* ,ari/otle def9es z m5tal excell5ce 9 its highe/ & fulle/ s5se1 is utt]ly incapable ( op]at+ 9 ! realm ( spiritual inve/igation4 ,= aft] ! _w by m5tal excell5ce knew n ,god1 x pleas$ ,god by ! fooli%ness 7to ! natural m5tal capacities7 ( ! ?+ prea*$ to save ^? t believe4 ,n ^? t und]/&1 = ! natural man receive? n ! ?+s ( ! ,_s ( ,god 7t is1 spiritual ?+s71 = !y are fooli%ness unto him2 nei!r c he "k 7or und]/&7 !m1 = !y are spiritually disc]n$ 7or und]/ood74 ,! ess5tial diff]5ce betwe5 natural & spiritual faculties1 z well z ! utt] incapacity ( ! natural faculties 9 ! spiritual realm1 are s cle>ly br\ght out 9 ?is passage t x is impossible to miss x4 ,by ?is x is n at all meant1 h[ev]1 t m5tal tra9+ & intellectual capacity h no place 9 c]ta9 bran*es ( ,bible /udy4 ,e believ] 9 ! ,book welcomes ! ke5e/ m9ds & ! mo/ exp]t s*ol>%ip 9 t bran* ( ,bible /udy1 = example1 :i* seeks1 by ! inve/igation ( ! manuscripts & ! v>iant read+s1 to arrive at ! v words t 7 writt5 by ! inspir$ writ]s2 or1 = example1 9 t o!r bran* ( /udy :i* seeks to discov] ! hi/ory & orig9s ( ! v>i\s books ( ! ,bible4 ,b x is meant t :5 m5 seek to "k ! spiritual tru?s ( ! ,bible1 !y are utt]ly unsci5tific if !y fail to use t faculty 9 _! inve/igation :i* ! ,textbook itself prescribes4 ,to sum x up1 fai? op5s ! way = ,god to quick5 into activity a spiritual capacity ?r\gh :i* ,he educates a man 9 spiritual ?+s entirely indep5d5tly ( ! s*ools4 ,! man :o really int5ds to be sci5tific1 !n1 w approa* ! ,bible 9 t attitude ( fai? :i* w lead him to w to d ,god's w z ! ,bible reveals x4 ,he w !n be :]e he c believe 8 way to an und]/&+ ( spiritual tru?4 #c4 ,! ,diff]5t ,k9ds ( ,tru? ,mu/ ,be ,sep>at$4 ,ano!r classification :i* ! sci5tific man makes is to di/+ui% betwe5 ! two k9ds ( tru? 9 ea* respective realm1 & to sep>ate t k9d :i* may be demon/rat$ to ! exp]i5ce f t :i* mu/ be tak5 on he>say4 ,t is1 9 ! natural realm1 9 ! dep>tm5t ( *emi/ry1 = example1 ! laws ( *emical action c be put to ! laboratory te/ ( exp]im5t1 :ile ! hi/ory ( ! sci5ce ( *emi/ry mu/ always be tak5 on he>say4 ,&1 9 ! spiritual realm1 ^? tru?s /at$ 9 ! spiritual ,textbook :i* h to d ) our spiritual relations ) ,god c be put to ! laboratory te/ ( ! exp]im5t ( fai?1 :ile all ! re/ mu/ be tak5 on he>say4 #d4 ,! ,primacy ( ,prim>y ,tru? ,mu/ ,be ,ma9ta9$4 ,"o ?+ m :i* ! sci5tific man does is to accord primacy to t realm ( tru? :i* is prim>y 9 importance4 ,9 ord] to d ?is1 ! sci5tific _s compels ! "o possess$ by x to meet two requirem5ts4 ,recogniz+ t tru? is an et]nal unity1 he w fir/ det]m9e to deal ) ! facts 9 any giv5 realm 9 su* a way z to pres]ve h>mony at all times betwe5 !m & all ! kn[n facts ( all ! o!r realms4 ,= only ?us c he avoid de/roy+ ! unity ( tru? & head+ himself t[>d error & confusion4 ,he w !n det]m9e to ma9ta9 ! primacy ( prim>y tru? by int]pret+ 9 its light ! facts ( all o!r realms4 ,t is1 he w make t realm ^: tru?s are ( transc5d5t importance ! norm1 or /&>d1 by :i* to int]pret ! facts ( o!r realms1 )hold+ int]pretations until ! facts ( any o!r giv5 realm c be int]pret$ 9 h>mony ) ^? prim>y tru?s :i* h be5 made =ev] secure by be+ sci5tifically v]ifi$4 ,^! requirem5ts w\ld seem s axiomatic z to ne$ no emphasis1 & yet1 /range z x may seem1 "r "h is ano!r place :]e ! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools "p company4 ,= ! ,*ur* is accord+ primacy to "o realm ( tru?1 & ! ,s*ools to ano!r1 mak+ unity ( f9al conclusions out ( ! "q4 ,if we are to be possess$ by ! sci5tific _s & proce$ ) sci5tific accuracy1 h[ev]1 we w be compell$1 9 ! t]ms ( our pres5t /udy1 to accord t primacy to ! spiritual realm ov] ! natural :i* its transc5d5t importance dem&s4 ,= by z mu* z tru? ab\t ,god is ( m et]nal value to s9ful man ?an tru? ab\t ,8 creation1 & by z mu* z tru? by :i* we are sav$ is ( m transc5d5t importance ?an tru? by :i* we are in=m$1 by j t mu* w ! sci5tific _s compel u to int]pret e bit ( in=mation t comes to u f ! natural realm 9 h>mony )1 & 9 ! light (1 ! tru?s ( ! spiritual realm1 = by ?is me?od alone c we ma9ta9 ! primacy ( ! spiritual realm ov] ! natural4 ,?is means t ! man :o is truly sci5tific w nev] int]pret discov]ies 9 ! natural realm 9 su* a way z to d5y or ev5 ?r[ d\bt ^u ^? fundam5tal tru?s 9 ! spiritual realm :i* h be5 =ev] secur$ by sci5tific demon/ration4 ,9 o!r words1 he w n seek to br+ ! ,bible into h>mony ) man's int]pretation ( sci5tific facts1 b he w seek to br+ e sci5tific discov]y into h>mony ) ! ,bible1 )hold+ f9al conclusions f all discov]ies t w n s h>monize until he has light en\gh s !y w4 ,we h n[ rea*$ ! po9t :]e we c sum up all ! requirem5ts :i* ! really sci5tific man w meet 9 ord] t he may be able to proce$ ) sci5tific accuracy 9 8 rese>*es 9 ! realms ( tru?4 ,he w sep>ate ! natural & ! spiritual realms ( tru? f ea* o!r4 ,he w inve/igate natural tru? ) ! intellect & spiritual tru? ) fai?4 ,he w di/+ui% tru? t c be demon/rat$ to ! exp]i5ce f t :i* mu/ be accept$ on te/imony alone4 ,& he w accord primacy to ! spiritual realm ov] ! natural4 ,x only rema9s to be said t ! man :o w n meet ^! requirem5ts is a total /rang] to ! sci5tific _s4 ,! ,/&>d ,diction>y says t sci5ce is k ga9$ & v]ifi$ by exact obs]vation & correct ?9k+1 & ! man :o w n meet requirem5ts t are absolutely necess>y = exact obs]vation & correct ?9k+ 9 ! ga9+ & v]ify+ ( k does n h ! fir/ qualification ( ! sci5tific inve/igator4 ,= he is really n op5 to tru? at all1 & is !re=e 9 no position to ma9ta9 ei!r ! unity betwe5 ! realms ( tru? or ! primacy ( prim>y tru?1 & exact obs]vation & correct ?9k+ are out ( ! "q "u su* conditions4 ,he _c v]ify any?+ ) sci5tific accuracy :5 he w n ev5 classify ! diff]5t realms ( tru? & ! faculties ( inve/igation1 or give ! realms _! respective places 9 ! sph]e ( tru?4 ,& s x is futile = "o :o refuses to d ?is to talk ab\t be+ 9 h>mony ) ! sci5tific _s4 ,:5 an inve/igator meets ^! requirem5ts1 on ! o!r h&1 he is !n ready to meet ! next dem& made ^u ! sci5tific inquir]1 :i* is-- ,,ii4 ,tru? ,mu/ ,be ,inve/igat$ ,sci5tifically4 ,accept+ ! self-evid5t accuracy ( ! classification we h j outl9$1 we w n[ give att5tion to :at ! sci5tific _s w require ( u at ^? two places :]e ! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools h p>t$ company4 ,= if we c get toge!r "h1 we c bo? proce$ & arrive toge!r 9 our inve/igation ( tru?1 & t w end ! controv]sy4 #a4 ,fai? ,mu/ ,be ,giv5 ,prec$5ce ov] ,reason4 ,let u see :at x w mean to give prec$5ce to fai? ov] reason :5 we are work+ 9 ! realm ( spiritual tru?4 ,x w mean t believ+ w prec$e reason+ 9 our approa* to ! ,^w ( ,god1 & ?is def9es ! vital di/9ction betwe5 ! true ,*ri/ian & ! rationali/4 a4 ,! ,me?od ( ! ,rationali/4 ,fai? & rationalism are mutually exclusive 9 ! spiritual realm4 ,rationaliz+ & d\bt+ are fir/ c\s9s :5 ! ,^w ( ,god is involv$4 ,satan 0 ! fir/ rationali/ on e>?1 & ,eve fell :5 %e accept$ 8 reason+s ab\t ! ,^w ( ,god 9 ! place ( simple fai? 9 t ,^w4 ,= ,satan rais$ a "q ab\t ! ,^w1--,yea1 ha? ,god said8--& !reby op5$ ! way = incipi5t d\bt1 & !n he reason$ ,eve into accept+ a common s5se int]pretation ( :at ,god _h said1 :i* prov$ to be an outright d5ial ( ,8 ,^w4 ,& look at ! consequ5ces--indescribably t]rible--( rationaliz+ ab\t ,god's ,^w in/ead ( believ+ x6 ,b rationalism did n /op !re1 = ev] s9ce t day all m5 )\t exception h be5 natural-born rationali/s4 ,= x is p]fectly natural to all m5 to rationalize ab\t ,god's ,^w1 b x takes a miracle ( ,div9e p[] to make any "o will+ to believe x4 ,^! two attitudes t[>d ,scripture are =ev] irreconcilable4 ,9 ! nature ( ?+s1 !y c nev] be h>moniz$4 ,! believ] 9 ! ,^w & ! rationali/ take two utt]ly div]g5t pa?s t _c possibly rea* ! same goal4 ,! program ( ! rationali/ is to arrive at an und]/&+ ( spiritual tru? ov] ! pa?way ( reason+ t is ap>t f fai?4 ,t ( ! believ] is to arrive at x ov] ! pa?way ( reason+ t is f\nd$ on fai?4 ,! program ( ! rationali/ is to h>monize ! ,^w ( ,god ) 8 conclusions4 ,t ( ! believ] is to h>monize 8 conclusions ) ! ,^w4 ,! program ( ! rationali/ is to become a critic ( ! ,^w & sit 9 judgm5t on x4 ,t ( ! believ] is to let ! ,^w become 8 critic & sit 9 judgm5t on him4 ,^! are c]ta9ly reasons en\gh :y ! believ] & ! rationali/ c nev] travel toge!r4 ,= ! believ] is walk+ by ,god's e/imate ( him1 :ile ! rationali/ is walk+ by 8 e/imate ( ,god1 & ^! pa?s g 9 opposite directions4 ,if y sit 9 judgm5t on "s portion ( ,god's ,^w & det]m9e t x is reasonable1 & t s9ce x comm5ds itself to y\r judgm5t x is !re=e acceptable & y w believe x1 t is n fai? 9 ! ,^w b 9 y\r own reason4 ,y h surr5d]$ y\r intellect to y\r own conclusions b y\r he>t is f> f ,god4 ,fai? 9 ! ,^w is surr5d] to x )\t pass+ judgm5t on x4 ,& yet surr5d]+ "o's m9d to "o's own conclusions ab\t ,god is precisely ! ?+ t passes = fai? 9 ,god on ! "p ( ^? :o h lo/ _! old-fa%ion$1 evangelical fai? :ile !y 7 9 ! ,s*ools1 & yet come out ) :at !y describe z a m intellig5t & rational fai? 9 ,god & ! ,bible4 ,9 _! desp]ate attempt to survive ! wreck ( _! or?odox fai?1 !y h reason$ _! way to conclusions ab\t ,god t h>moniz$ ) :at !y 7 taught 9 ! ,s*ools2 b ! ,god !y arriv$ at 0 ! god ( rationalism & n ! ,god ( ,revelation4 ,!y w say to ! or?odox man1 ,y & ,i g by diff]5t pa?ways1 b we bo? arrive at ! same ,god4 ,b ?is is et]nally impossible6 ,= !re is only "o pa?way lead+ to ! true ,god1 & t is n foll[$ by reason+ "o's way out ( a %att]$ fai?1 b fir/ by believ+ "o's way out ( d>kness into light1 & !n by believ+ /eadily on 9 t div9ely imp>t$ fai? :i* always %att]s ! reason+s & conclusions ( ! rationali/s4 ,to be a believ] 9 ! ,^w puts rationalism out ( bus9ess1 = no "o c reason himself into ! acceptance ( tru? he already believes4 ,& on ! o!r h&1 to be a rationali/ reg>d+ ! ,^w puts fai? out ( bus9ess1 = fai? is ! acceptance ( ! b>e ,^w ( ,god )\t fur!r evid5ce1 & ! rationaliz] is compell$ to reject t attitude t[>d ! ,^w s t he may h ! way left op5 to reason 8 way to :at he is will+ to accept z evid5ce4 ,?is is :y s _m ( ^? /ud5ts :o sit 9 ! classes ( ! rationali/s 9 our colleges & sem9>ies lose _! fai?4 ,rationalism makes ,scriptural fai? impossible4 ,rationaliz+ & believ+1 :5 ! ,bible is 9 "q1 are mutually exclusive4 ,! reason = ?is is n t ! facts ( ,scripture contradict ea* o!r1 & c]ta9ly n t ^! facts are "o ?+ to fai? & ano!r ?+ to reason4 ,! antagonism does n arise ov] ! facts ( ! ,^w b ov] ! int]pretation ( !m4 ,! rationali/1 accept+ no int]pretation except t furni%$ by 8 own puny & incompet5t reason unillum9$ by fai?1 rea*es conclusions absolutely contradict$ by ^? arriv$ at by ! man ( fai?4 ,! fact is1 he c\ld n hope to arrive any:]e else4 ,= h[ c f9ite man relate & int]pret ! few & scatt]$ facts he discov]s 9 ! realm ( inf9ite tru?8 ,h[ c a man by se>*+ f9d out ,god8 ,by ^: int]pretation1 y\rs or m9e8 is a favorite "q :i* ! rationali/ asks ! believ] :5 ! mean+ ( "s ,scripture passage is 9 "q4 ,by no "o's int]pretation except ! ,holy ,_s's6 ,he alone c int]pret ! ,bible1 = ,he alone kn[s :at ,he meant by :at ,he wrote4 ,& ev5 ! ,holy ,_s is able to int]pret ! ,bible to no "o b ! believ]4 ,= ! rationali/1 ! unbeliev]1 rejects fai?1 & !reby completely closes ! eyes ( ! he>t to ! illum9ation ( ! ,_s2 :ile ! fai? ( ! believ] is ! v ?+ t op5s ! he>t to an und]/&+ ( ! ,^w4 ,spiritual appreh5sion beg9s only at ! po9t :]e fai? beg9s4 ,?is is :y x is t :5 ! rationali/ tries 8 h& at int]pretation he is sure1 soon] or lat]1 to br+ p]fectly h>moni\s facts into confusion & contradiction4 ,take1 = example1 ! facts reg>d+ ! developm5t ( ! human embryo4 ,! rationali/ notes t z x develops x be>s a /rik+ resemblance1 successively1 to ! m mature =ms ( "s ( ! l[] animals1 9 an imag9$ ord]ly progress f l[] to high]4 ,t ?is resemblance is a fact no "o disputes4 ,!re is no controv]sy ov] ! fact4 ,b :5 ! rationali/ attempts to expla9 ?is fact1 he int]prets x to mean t man is ! product ( evolution1 r ?an a special creation1 z ! ,bible says he is1 & ?us he ?ru/s su* confusion & contradiction be=e u t we are compell$ to make a *oice betwe5 8 int]pretation & ! /atem5ts ( ! ,bible4 ,! controv]sy t results is caus$ altoge!r by ! rationali/ ?ru/+ himself into t place t belongs to ! ,holy ,_s alone4 ,he %all lead y into all ! tru?1 said ,*ri/1 & x is presumptu\s 9 ! extreme to seek to d ! ,holy ,_s's "w = ,him4 ,we are =ew>n$ ( ! me?ods ( ! mod]n rationali/ 9 8 approa* to ! ,bible by :at ,*ri/ said to ! ,jews :o 7 f9d+ fault ) :at ,he taught3 ,= _h ye believ$ ,moses1 ,he said1 ye w\ld h believ$ ,me2 = he wrote ( ,me4 ,b if ye believe n 8 writ+s1 h[ %all ye believe ,my words8 ,?is is precisely ! pa?way mod]n rationalism has foll[$4 ,x began by discr$it+ :at ,moses wrote1 & x has n[ gone to ! l5g? ( d5y+ f9al au?ority to :at ,*ri/ said4 ,rationalism is bo? irrev]5t & de/ructive :5 x seeks to d any?+ ) ! ,^w ( ,god4 ,= t ,book is to be h&l$ z no o!r book is4 ,beh9d ! hi/orical1 & ! lit]>y1 & ! textual1 & ! philosophical criticism mu/ be a spiritual disc]nm5t1 born ( fai? alone1 :i* bo? dom9ates & regulates all ! re/4 ,= j z a bl9d man may turn ! eyes ( 8 head to ! sun & see no physical light1 s ! rationali/ may turn ! eyes ( 8 m9d to ! ,bible & see no spiritual tru?4 ,x takes ! eyes ( ! he>t to see spiritual tru?1 & !y c function only ?r\gh fai?4 b4 ,! ,me?od ( ! ,believ]4 ,9 ord] cle>ly to und]/& ! me?od ( fai?1 we ne$ "r "h to gu>d aga9/ ano!r extreme4 ,by ! contra/s we h drawn 9 ! la/ few pages1 x is n at all meant t !re is no place 9 ! ex]cise ( fai? = ! ex]cise also ( ! intellect at ! same "t & t[>d ! same object4 ,=1 9 ! nature ( ?+s1 ! intellect mu/ be ex]cis$ 9 a m5tal appreh5sion ( t :i* is to be believ$ be=e ! way is ev5 op5 = fai? to beg94 ,nei!r is x meant t reason+ is s out ( h>mony ) & de/ructive ( fai? t its ex]cise 9 connection ) fai? is impossible4 ,= fai? is n bl9d cr$ulity2 x is n jump+ 9 ! d>k2 x is n an irrational impulse2 x is n swall[+ some?+ ) ! eyes %ut4 ,x is r an op5-ey$ /epp+ out on to ! spiritual f\ndations ( ! univ]se4 ,b notice--x is /epp+ out on to spiritual f\ndations4 ,x is meant1 h[ev]1 by ! contra/s above1 t ! mom5t an intellectual appreh5sion ( :at is to be believ$1 foll[$ by a conclusion to accept or reject x accord+ to :e!r x is reasonable or n--! mom5t su* an attitude is sub/itut$ = ! he>t acceptance ( ! b>e ,^w ( ,god1 ev5 ?\gh x may be beyond und]/&+ & reason1 t mom5t ! normal ex]cise ( m9d & reason has deg5]at$ into a rationalism t makes fai? impossible4 ,notice an emphasis above4 ,fai? is /epp+ out ^u spiritual f\ndations4 ,!n recall t to all except ! man ( presumption1 f\ndations mu/ be se5 be=e !y w be /epp$ ^u4 ,! normal man dem&s to see :]e he is go+4 ,n[ spiritual f\ndations c be se5 only by spiritual eyes4 ,! natural vision _c see pa/ ! natural realm4 ,& spiritual realities w nev] be /epp$ out ^u until !y are se54 ,= fai? is n an ab/ract & aimless emotion4 ,x requires an object t c be se51 & "o t c be tru/$4 ,x is !re=e ! "o ma9 purpose ( ! ,bible to set be=e m5 ! "o sav+ ,object ( fai?4 ,?is purpose lies beh9d ! multipli$ revelations ( ,god all ?r\gh ! ,old ,te/am5t1 & ! ga!r+ toge!r ( all ^? revelations into ,*ri/ 9 ! ,new ,te/am5t 9 su* fullness & f9ality t ,he c\ld say3 ,he t ha? se5 me ha? se5 ! ,fa!r4 ,b ,god & ,*ri/ mu/ be se5 be=e !y c be tru/$4 ,n intellectually or hi/orically1 b spiritually se54 ,& !y c be se5 only by spiritual eyes4 ,& spiritual vision is possible only ?r\gh ! div9e t\*4 ,& ! div9e t\* is giv5 only to ^? :o cons5t2 x is n =c$ on any "o4 ,& ! attitude ( cons5t is precisely ! attitude set =? 9 ,*ri/'s =mula3 ,if any man wills to d1 he %all "k4 ,only by com+ into ?is attitude c any man see ,god4 ,! pure 9 he>t1 said ,*ri/1 %all see ,god4 ,x is a he>t attitude4 ,& ! mean+ ( ! purity ( he>t t op5s ! vision to ,god is br\ght out :5 ,*ri/ is ask$ ! "q1 ,h[ is x t ,?\ wilt manife/ ,?yself unto u & n unto ! _w8 ,8 answ] is ( ! utmo/ significance4 ,he says1 ,if a man love ,me1 he w keep ,my words4 ,keep+ ,8 words1 will+ to d ,8 w--?is is ! attitude t op5s ! vision to ,him4 ,he & ! ,fa!r c manife/ !mselves to & be se5 by ^? only :o are 9 ! attitude ( cons5t t[>d ! keep+ ( ,8 words4 ,?is is ! only attitude t c br+ ! ano9t+ ( ! eyes ) t eye-salve :i* op5s !m to spiritual vision4 ,b :5 ! eyes1 9 response to ?is attitude ( will+ness t[>d ! w ( ,god1 are once op5$ to spiritual ?+s1 !n ,god1 9 all ! p]fections ( ,8 div9e "*1 is se5 bo? 9 ! ,bible1 ! writt5 ,^w1 & 9 ,*ri/1 ! liv+ ,^w1 & ?is two-fold revelation ( ,him is se5 to be z p]fect & flawless z ! ,god :o is ?us reveal$4 ,^? :o ?9k !y see imp]fections ei!r 9 ! ,bible or 9 ,*ri/ are spiritually bl9d4 ,= :5 "o ?9ks he sees flaws :]e !re are only inf9ite p]fections1 he adv]tises to all t he is attempt+ ! impossible task ( exam9+ spiritual realities ) 8 natural vision1 & is !re=e pass+ judgm5t on :at he has nev] se54 ,b :5 ! spiritual vision has once be5 op5$1 & ,god is really se51 9 ! ,bible & 9 ,*ri/1 9 all ! p]fections ( ,8 inf9itely holy & lov+ "*1 ! reason at once leads to ! conclusion f ! facts se5 t su* a ,be+ is to be tru/$1 & active fai? !reby becomes ! outgr[? ( t k9d ( reason+4 ,t is1 ! fai? t beg9s z an attitude ( will+ness t[>d ! w ( ,god1 ?r\gh :i* attitude ! eyes are t\*$ into a vision ( ! "* ( ,god1 su* a fai? comes into & cont9ues 9 an active submission to t w ?r\gh ! normal function+ ( reason4 ,?is %[s ! vital diff]5ce betwe5 reason+ & rationaliz+1 & ! relation ( ea* to fai?4 ,! effect ( reason+ on fai? is con/ructive1 :ile t ( rationaliz+ is de/ructive4 ,& ! he>t ( ! diff]5ce betwe5 ! two traces back1 9 ! la/ analysis1 to ^? two k9ds ( vision4 ,! rationali/1 unyield+ to ! t\* ( ,god on 8 vision1 sees only natural facts1 & ev5 !n he sees !m only p>tially & :olly out ( relation to ! spiritual revelation ( ,god 9 ! ,bible & 9 ,*ri/2 & ?9k+ t he sees discrepancies betwe5 ! facts 9 ! natural realm & ! /atem5ts ( ,scripture1 8 reason leads him to reject ! ,bible z infallible & in]rant1 !reby mak+ fai? 9 ! ,god ( ! ,bible utt]ly impossible4 ,8 reason+ p[]s are simply function+ normally :5 he concludes to reject ! /atem5ts ab\t ! facts t to him are entirely unse5 :i* d n seem to agree ) :at he sees4 ,8 tr\ble is n ) 8 reason+ p[]s b ) 8 vision4 ,refus+ to see :at he is pass+ judgm5t on1 8 me?od ( inquiry is rationaliz+4 ,b ! believ]1 utt]ly yield$ to ,god & !re=e see+ ,him ?r\gh ano9t$ eyes 9 bo? ! writt5 & ! liv+ ,^w1 ?us see+ ! inf9ite p]fections ( ,8 "*1 is l$ by ! normal function+ ( ! same reason to accept & act on ! b>e ,^w ( ,god )\t fur!r evid5ce1 because ! evid5ce he sees is all ! evid5ce he ne$s4 ,x is p]fectly reasonable1 !re=e1 = ,him to accept all t su* an ,"o says 9 ,8 ,^w1 wait+ = ! p>tial & app>5tly contradictory k 9 ! natural realm to be correct$ into h>mony ) ! ,bible4 ,& 8 reason+ p[]s are simply function+ normally :5 he accepts ! ,bible z infallible & in]rant1 = ?is attitude is bas$ on :at he sees4 ,! entire diff]5ce betwe5 ! rationali/ & ! believ] is a matt] ( vision4 ,! reason+ p[]s ( ea* simply act 9 view ( :at ea* sees4 ,?is is :y reason+ is nev] out ( h>mony ) fai?1 :ile rationaliz+ always is4 ,= true reason+ 9 spiritual ?+s is bas$ on an attitude ( fai?1 :ile rationaliz+ rejects t attitude z an ess5tial prelim9>y to correct conclusions1 & !re=e reasons ei!r entirely ap>t f or 9 ord] to fai?4 ,su* an attitude z op5s ! vision does n prec$e ! action ( reason1 & ! conclusions _c help be+ de/ructive ( fai?1 = !y are pron\ncem5ts on ?+s utt]ly unse5 & unkn[n1 & :i* ! ,bible says are fooli%ness to ! man :o sees only ?r\gh 8 natural vision4 ,b ! attitude ( will+ness t[>d ! w ( ,god s op5s ! vision to ! :ole spiritual realm t ! real fooli%ness is se5 to be ev5 ! lea/ attempt to pron\nce ^u or repudiate t :i* is utt]ly unse5 & unkn[n4 ,?is is ! fundam5tal reason :y !re is su* div]g5ce1 ev5 to ! po9t ( mutual exclusion1 betwe5 ! diff]5t int]pretations ( ,scripture giv5 =? by ! believ] & ! rationali/4 ,! rationali/1 ) he>t & vision clos$ to spiritual tru?1 c give no int]pretation except t :i* seems reasonable 9 view ( :at he sees2 :ile ! believ]1 9 ! attitude ( fai? t[>d ,god1 sees ! int]pretation ( ,scripture ?r\gh ! illum9ation ( ! ,holy ,_s4 ,! int]pretation ( ! ,^w is ! v "w = :i* ! ,holy ,_s has come into ! _w4 ,t is n all ( ,8 "w1 b a v ess5tial "p ( x4 ,he is ,god's (ficial ,int]pret] ( ,8 tru? to ! believ]4 ,n to ! rationaliz]1 b to ! believ]4 ,& ,8 "w is s div9ely p]fect & absolutely f9al t all human attempts at int]pretation1 :i* are devoid ( fai?1 are an insult to ,him4 ,he is ! ,"o :o wrote ! ,^w1 & s ,he kn[s ! mean+1 n only ( :at ,he said1 b ev5 ( :at ,he left unsaid1 & !re=e none b ,he c int]pret ei!r ! words or ! sil5ces ( ,scripture4 ,= example1 :5 ,mel*iz$ek fla%es1 meteor-l1 across ! page ( ,old ,te/am5t hi/ory1 & !n disappe>s )\t a ^w z to beg9n+ ( life or end ( days1 :o b ! ,holy ,_s c\ld int]pret ^? sil5ces into spiritual mean+s ( unfa?omable ri*ness8 ,:o b ,he :o 0 responsible = ^? omissions c\ld int]pret !m into "s ( ! ri*e/ revelations ( all ,scripture conc]n+ ! et]nal ,prie/hood ( ! sla9 & ris5 ,son ( ,god8 ,& if ! ,holy ,_s c ?us seize ^u ! v sil5ces ( ,scripture 9 %[+ u ! ?+s ( ,*ri/1 :o w d5y ,him ! p[] to int]pret to ^? :o w receive x :at ,he meant by :at ,he wrote8 ,& :o b ! rationali/ & ! unbeliev] c ev] refuse to let ,him reveal ! p]fect h>mony betwe5 ! facts ( nature & ! sci5tific ref]5ces ( ,scripture8 ,x is ! div9e pr]ogative to cause u to und]/& ! ,book4 ,:5 ! ris5 ,*ri/ appe>$ sudd5ly among ! disciples1 fir/ fright5$ & !n sc>cely believ+ = joy1 ,he fir/ conv9c$ !m t x 0 really ,he to :om !y _h already giv5 _! he>ts1 ?us quick5+ _! fai? into r5ew$ activity1 ,!n op5$ ,he _! m9d t !y might und]/& ! ,scriptures4 ,fir/ fai? & !n k ( ! tru?2 ?is is ! sci5tific ord]4 ,lu!r saw ?is :5 he wrote to ,spalat93 ,above all ?+s x is q true t "o _c se>* into ! ,holy ,scriptures by means ( /udy1 nor by means ( ! intellect4 ,!re=e beg9 ) pray] t ! ,"l grant unto y ! true und]/&+ ( ,8 ,^w4 ,ev5 ,sp5c] _h a glimpse ( ?is sci5tific pr9ciple t[>d ! end ( 8 life4 ,9 8 essay on ,feel+ ,v]sus ,intellect he %[$ t he _h lo/ fai? 9 8 =m] e/imate ( ! place ( ! intellect 9 ! moral realm :5 he said3 ,ev]y:]e ! cry is educate--educate--educate6 ,ev]y:]e ! belief is t by su* culture z s*ools furni%1 *ildr51 & !re=e adults1 c be mold$ into ! desir$ %apes4 ,x is assum$ t :5 m5 are taught :at is "r1 !y w d :at is "r--t a proposition intellectually accept$ becomes morally op]ative4 ,& ?is conviction1 contradict$ by ev]yday exp]i5ce1 is at v>iance ) an ev]yday axiom--! axiom t ea* faculty is /r5g!n$ by ! ex]cise ( x--intellectual p[] by intellectual action1 & moral p[] by moral action4 ,:at c ?is mean b t ,sp5c] saw1 at lea/ dimly1 ! radical diff]5ce betwe5 ! intellectual & ! spiritual faculties8 ,! logic ( all ^! facts & pr9ciples makes only "o conclusion possible4 ,:5 ! man ( sci5tific _s approa*es ! ,book :i* c reveal its tru?s to fai? alone1 he w n be unsci5tific en\gh to refuse fai? to its /atem5ts & use 8 intellect alone4 ,= he w see t ! "o :o refuses ! attitude ( fai? t[>d ! ,scriptures w be ev] le>n+ & nev] able to come to a k ( ! tru?1 :ile ! "o :o accepts ! ,^w 9 humble dep5d5ce on ! ,holy ,_s's int]pretation ( its mean+ is on ! "o solit>y highway by :i* a k ( ! tru? c be rea*$4 ,:5 ! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools1 !re=e1 agree on us+ ?is me?od ( approa* to ! ,^w ( ,god1 !y w at lea/ h />t$ t[>d ! same goal4 #b4 ,! ,spiritual ,realm ,mu/ ,be ,giv5 ,primacy ov] ! ,natural4 ,let u n[ see :at x w mean to accord primacy to ! spiritual realm ov] ! natural4 ,!re is only "o possible me?od ( do+ ?is1 & t is to int]pret 9 ! light ( spiritual tru? all ! facts ( ! natural realm4 ,! man ( sci5tific m9d w !re=e see cle>ly t he w be utt]ly incapable ( giv+ su* an int]pretation to natural facts until he fir/ kn[s :at spiritual tru? is1 & ?is w mean ! laboratory me?od ( ! exp]im5t ( fai?4 ,b "r "h y may say t sci5ce has no?+ to d ) ! spiritual realm2 t sci5tific inve/igation /ops ! mom5t x rea*es t realm2 & t !re=e to dem& ! use ( ^! sci5tific me?ods 9 t realm is n only fooli% b impossible4 ,b /op & ?9k a m9ute4 ,x is bo? fooli% & futile to dem& t ei!r ! implem5ts or ! faculties us$ 9 ! sci5tific realm %all be br\ght ov] & us$ 9 ! pursuit ( spiritual tru?4 ,?is is precisely ! ?+ we are seek+ to %[4 ,b t does n mean = a mom5t t ! inquir] mu/ !re=e give up ! sci5tific attitude ( m9d & cease to "w accord+ to ! dem&s ( ! sci5tific _s ! mom5t he beg9s inquiry 9 ! spiritual realm4 ,= t _s is simply an hone/ & accurate me?od ( inve/igation1 & because sci5ce is compell$ to /op at ! bord] ( ! spiritual realm is no reason :y we %\ld cease be+ hone/ & accurate :5 we inve/igate 9 t realm4 ,x is p]fectly true t ! sci5ti/1 z su*1 has absolutely no pron\ncem5t to make conc]n+ spiritual tru?2 b x is equally true t ! inquir] 9 ! spiritual realm1 if he does n pursue 8 inquiries by sci5tific me?ods & accord+ to ! dem&s ( ! sci5tific _s1 w h no pron\ncem5t to make ei!r4 ,! man :o int5ds1 !re=e1 to be sci5tific en\gh 9 8 _s to give prim>y tru? its place ( primacy by int]pret+ 9 its light ! tru?s ( o!r realms1 & :o1 ) ! in/9cts ( ! true sci5ti/1 recognizes spiritual tru? z prim>y 9 its relation to ! natural1 w be actuat$ suffici5tly by 8 sci5tific attitude to det]m9e to "k :at spiritual tru? is1 9 ord] t he may be able to int]pret natural tru? 9 its light4 ,?is w br+ him face to face ) ,*ri/'s =mula = ent]+ ^u ! k ( spiritual tru?4 ,be+ hone/ly desir\s ( kn[+ :at spiritual tru? is1 he w det]m9e to d ,god's w 9 ord] t he may f9d out4 a4 ,?is ,w ,mean ,surr5d]+ ! ,he>t to ,god4 ,?is is ! only ?+ x c mean4 ,= spiritual tru? is prim>ily he>t tru?1 n intellectual tru?1 & ! only way to "k he>t tru? is to surr5d] ! he>t to t ,holy ,_s ( tru? :o se>*e? ! deep ?+s ( ,god1 & :o 0 s5t into ! _w to lead u into all ! tru?4 ,! gramm>ian1 ! philologi/1 ! hi/orian1 ! naturali/1 ! philosoph]1 !re=e1 h no s]vice !y c p]=m "h4 ,!y _c c>ry _! app>atus ov] into ! spiritual realm & weigh & measure1 e/imate & judge1 illum9e & int]pret spiritual tru? = u4 ,:5 we /& "h we are on t holy gr\nd :]e we mu/ lay (f our s&als ( sci5tific p>aph]nalia & /& be=e ,god ) op5 he>t ready to he> :at ,he has to say4 ,! mom5t we get to ?is realm1 ! :ole app>atus by :i* tru? is receiv$ *anges f reason to fai?4 ,b d y see :]e ?is br+s u8 ,/raight back to ,*ri/'s =mula6 ,?is is precisely :at ,8 =mula involves1 = :5 a man wills to d ,god's w1 he takes ! fir/ /ep 9 fai?4 ,!n :5 a man comes into ?is attitude t[>d ,god's w1 he w next inquire :]e he is to comm5ce 9 ! do+ ( t w1 :at ! fir/ /ep is 9 ! w ( ,god4 ,! ,textbook tells u t ! fir/ /ep is to rep5t & believe ! ,gospel4 ,t ?is is ! fir/ /ep is self-evid5t1 because ! he>t mu/ be op5$ to ,him :o alone c give ! k ( spiritual tru? be=e t k is possible1 & rep5tance & fai? are ! op5+ ( ! he>t to ,him4 ,= rep5tance is a com+ into t attitude ( he>t t[>d ,god 9 :i* ! :ole life is laid b>e be=e ,him exactly z x is1 !reby op5+ ! way = fai?2 & believ+ ! ,gospel is an ent]+ ^u t fai? :i* accepts ! ,gospel--! ,good ,news--( ,*ri/'s f9i%$ "w ( atonem5t = s9 ?r\gh ,8 %$ blood on ! cross1 & reckons p>don = s9 & new life 9 ,*ri/ to be n[ ours accord+ to ! ,^w ( ,god4 ,= fai?1 y rememb]1 is bo? an attitude & an act2 an attitude ( surr5d] to ,god1 & an act ( receiv+ :at ,god has = u2 & ?is is precisely :at x means to rep5t & believe ! ,gospel4 ,?is means t ! man ( g5u9e sci5tific _s w beg9 8 pursuit ( spiritual tru? by s9c]e rep5tance t[>d ,god & fai? t[>d our ,"l ,jesus ,*ri/ = salvation ?r\gh ,8 %$ blood1 :i*1 accord+ to ! ,textbook1 are ! fir/ /eps 9 will+ to d ! w ( ,god1 foll[$ by a mom5t-by-mom5t dep5d5ce on ,*ri/1 ,:o is n[ 8 life1 to reveal tru? to him z he cont9ues1 by fai?1 9 ! attitude ( an op5 he>t4 ,?is is ! only possible way ( ev] kn[+ t tru? :i* alone c make u free4 ,x is true t x is q ! fa%ion ^! days = e unbeliev]1 agno/ic1 mod]ni/1 & unit>ian to quote ^? words ( ,*ri/ ,ye %all "k ! tru?1 & ! tru? %all make y free 9 ju/ification ( ! claim t some?+ :i* he is pleas$ to call tru? has giv5 him :at he fancies is fre$om4 ,b ,scripture c\ld n be m grossly p]v]t$ ?an by su* a wre/+ ( its pla9 mean+4 ,! :ole /atem5t reads3 ,!n said ,jesus unto ^? ,jews t believ$ on ,him1 if ye cont9ue 9 ,my ,^w1 !n are ye ,my disciples inde$2 & ye %all "k ! tru?1 & ! tru? %all make y free4 ,only ! spiritually bl9d c fail to see ! mean+ ( su* a /atem5t4 ,x pla9ly means t ! fir/ /ep t[>d fre$om is fai? 9 ,*ri/1 ! g5u95ess ( :i* is evid5c$ by cont9uance 9 ,8 ,^w2 & t x is only 9 ?is attitude ( fai? t x is possible to "k ! tru? t makes u free4 ,! tru? is1 !re=e1 t to be free "o mu/ believe on ,*ri/4 ,?is does n mean to give intellectual ass5t to ?is or t fact ab\t ,him1 b utt]ly to commit ! life to ,him1 s9 & all1 pa/1 pres5t1 & future4 ,= ! ,gospel tells u n s mu* :at to believe z ,:om to believe1 & ,paul tells u :at fai? 9 ,*ri/ means :5 he exclaims3 ,i "k ,:om ,i h believ$1 & !n fur!r unfolds :at ?is involves by add+1 & am p]suad$ t ,he is able to keep t :i* ,i h committ$ unto ,him aga9/ t day4 ,fai? is n simply giv+ m5tal ass5t to facts1 x is prim>ily surr5d]+ to a ,p]son4 ,?is is :at x means to believe on ,*ri/1 & any?+ %ort ( ?is w nei!r give u k ( ! tru? nor make u free4 ,!n foll[+ ?is attitude t[>d ,*ri/1 ! believ] evid5ces 8 fai? by cont9u+ 9 ,8 ,^w1 by :i* he comes into exp]i5tial k ( its tru? & its mean+4 ,!n com+ to "k ! tru? by exp]i5c+ x ?r\gh fai?1 he is :]e ! ,son ( ,god ,himself becomes 8 fre$om4 ,& !re is no o!r fre$om4 ,x is 9 ! exp]i5ce ( ,himself1 n 9 an intellectual ass5t to facts ab\t ,him1 t ,he makes u free by becom+ ! way to ,god = u1 ! tru? ab\t ,god to u1 & ! life ( ,god 9 u4 ,x is !re=e only he :om ! ,son sets free :o is free inde$1 = fre$om f ! curse ( s9 by ! exp]i5ce ( ,*ri/ z ,savi\r1 & fre$om f ! bl9dness ( error by ! exp]i5ce ( ,*ri/ z ,tru? inc>nate1 is ! only fre$om !re is4 ,:5 ! ,^w says1 !re=e1 ,:atsoev] is n ( fai? is s91 x contemplates bo? ! object ( fai? & ! cause ( =feit$ fre$om4 ,= ! ,holy ,_s came to convict m5 ( s9 because !y believe n on ,*ri/4 ,unfai? 9 ,*ri/ is !re=e ! ess5ce ( s94 ,& s9 is bondage1 n fre$om4 ,scripture describes ! unbeliev] 9 ,*ri/ z ! bondslave ( s91 held 9 *a9s ( d>kness & error4 ,?is is :y x is impossible ei!r to "k ev5 natural tru? 9 any adequate way1 or to be able to untangle x f error1 )\t becom+ a believ] on ,*ri/ z ! fir/ /ep4 ,s let no "o :o has n surr5d]$ 8 he>t to ,*ri/ 9 fai? boa/ t he ei!r kn[s ! tru? or is free4 ,b suppose a man %\ld seek to "k spiritual tru? & yet refuse to surr5d] 8 he>t to ,*ri/ 9 fai?1 !n :at8 ,x c\ld only be because he 0 s devoid ( ! sci5tific _s t he did n want to "k ! tru? at any co/4 ,& no man :o is 9 ?is frame ( m9d c ev] come to "k ! tru?4 ,haeckel def9es ! sci5tific attitude ( m9d :5 he says ( ! sci5tific inquir] t 8 sole & only task is to seek to "k ! tru?1 & to tea* :at he has discov]$ to be ! tru?1 indiff]5t z to 444 consequ5ces4 ,?is means1 9 ! t]ms ( our pres5t discussion1 t 9 ord] to "k spiritual tru?1 ! man ( sci5tific m9d w be will+ to "w by ,*ri/'s =mula no matt] :at x co/s him1 = t alone w give him ! k ( et]nal ?+s :i* w make x possible adequately to int]pret natural tru?4 ,b suppose ! inquir] d\bts ! possibility ( ent]+ into a sci5tific k ( spiritual tru? by foll[+ ?is =mula1 :at !n8 ,x c only be because he is s uns*ol>ly z to make ! blund] 9 logic ( assum+ z untrue or impossible t :i* rema9s to be prov$4 ,no matt] on :i* gr\nd he refuses to surr5d] to ,*ri/1 !re=e1 no inquir] aft] spiritual tru? c be ei!r sci5tific or s*ol>ly :o makes ?is refusal2 = he !reby r5d]s himself n only utt]ly incompet5t to "k spiritual tru?1 b also entirely unable to accord primacy to ! spiritual realm by int]pret+ natural tru? 9 its light4 ,suppose a man %\ld take ?is attitude ( indiff]5ce or unbelief t[>d natural tru?4 ,suppose t aft] refus+ to make ! fir/ exp]im5t 9 ! /udy ( *emi/ry he %\ld attempt rese>*es 9 a realm ^: facts requir$ int]pretation 9 ! light ( ! *emical laws he _h refus$ to le>n 9 ! laboratory4 ,!n suppose he %\ld dogmatically ann\nce su* int]pretations ( 8 discov]ies 9 t realm z 7 altoge!r out ( h>mony ) ! mo/ fundam5tal laws 9 ! *emical realm4 ,& !n suppose t 9 ord] to ma9ta9 8 unf\nd$ & arbitr>y int]pretations he %\ld s twi/ ! /atem5ts ( ! textbook on *emi/ry into h>mony ) 8 !ories z to de/roy _! ess5tial integrity4 ,he w\ld w9 no?+ b contempt f exp]i5c$ *emi/s4 ,he w\ld c]ta9ly f9d no place 9 ! ranks ( sci5ti/s4 ,?is is precisely :y evolutioni/s & rationali/s1 us+ ?is me?od exactly1 c w9 no response f exp]i5c$ ,*ri/ians1 & :y !y ought to be outside ! memb]%ip ( our *ur*es z long z !y pursue ?is me?od4 ,believ]s c n li/5 = "o mom5t to su* int]pretations ( sci5tific facts by unbeliev]s z de/roy ! ess5tial doctr9es ( ! ,*ri/ian fai? & d5y ! in]rancy & f9al au?ority ( ! ,^w ( ,god4 ,= unbeliev]s h n only n secur$ a sci5tific k ( :at !y are talk+ ab\t1 b !y h n ev5 acquir$ ! "r to pass an op9ion on ! fundam5tal doctr9es ( ! ,bible4 ,h[ c !y ann\nce dogmatically s-call$ sci5tific int]pretations ( ! facts ( nature :i* give ! lie to ! unmi/akable doctr9es ( ! spiritual ,textbook ^: tru?fulness !y h refus$ to put to ! laboratory te/ ( exp]i5ce1 & yet at ! same "t claim to be actuat$ by ! sci5tific _s8 ,^? :o d su* ?+s "k no?+ ab\t ! sci5tific _s6 ,canon ,dyson ,hague 0 sci5tifically correct :5 he said t ! rationali/s are be+ oppos$1 n on ! gr\nd ( _! s*ol>%ip1 b because ! biblical criticism ( rationali/s & unbeliev]s c be nei!r exp]t nor sci5tific4 ,!re is b "o conclusion possible4 ,! man :o int5ds to accord primacy to ! spiritual realm w fir/ acquire a v]ifi$ k ( spiritual tru? by ! laboratory me?od ( exp]i5ce1 accord+ to ! =mula ( ! ,textbook4 ,= :5 he does ?is he w !n be qualifi$ to take ! next /ep & make ! primacy ( spiritual tru? an actual reality4 b4 ,?is w ,mean ,int]pret+ ,natural ,tru? 9 ! ,light ( ! ,bible4 ,we h n[ arriv$ at t po9t :]e we c sum up ! logic ( ! sci5tific me?od ( ! laboratory z x applies to ! inve/igation ( ! !ory ( evolution4 ,! man :o is hone/ en\gh to want to "k ! tru? at all co/1 & accurate en\gh to insi/ on com+ into a k ( ! tru? bo? by sci5tific me?ods & 9 ! sci5tific ord] ( primacy1 w fir/ acquire an adequate k by exp]i5ce1 z we h already decid$1 ( ^? /atem5ts ( ! ,bible t c be v]ifi$ to ! exp]i5ce1 & !n he w = ! fir/ "t be qualifi$ to arrive at an adequate e/imate ( ! /atem5ts t _c be s v]ifi$4 ,!n recogniz+ t all ! sci5tific ref]5ces ( ! ,bible1 includ+ ^? relat+ to orig9s1 are 9 t class t c n be v]ifi$ to ! exp]i5ce1 he w decide to come to no conclusions conc]n+ !m except su* z w ma9ta9 bo? ! primacy ( prim>y tru? & ! unity ( all ! realms ( tru?4 ,he w d ?is because x is ! only ?+ he c d & /ill ma9ta9 a truly sci5tific attitude ( m9d4 ,?is w mean t he w int]pret all ! non-exp]im5tal /atem5ts ( ! ,bible1 includ+ ! sci5tific ref]5ces1 9 h>mony ) & 9 ! light ( ^? spiritual & exp]i5tial tru?s :i* he has already _h v]ifi$ to him ?r\gh 8 own p]sonal relations ) ,god ?r\gh fai? 9 ,*ri/4 ,9 o!r words1 he w ma9ta9 ! primacy ( spiritual tru? by all[+ no int]pretation ( sci5tific facts t w ca/ ei!r d5ial or d\bt on ^? fundam5tal doctr9es :i* he n[ kn[s are true1 because !y h be5 sup]naturally v]ifi$ to him ?r\gh ! laboratory te/ ( fai?4 ,take an illu/ration4 ,suppose an au?or on *emi/ry1 :o 0 also a hi/orian1 %\ld include 9 8 textbook a hi/ory ( ! sci5ce ( *emi/ry4 ,n[ if a man puts 8 /atem5ts ( *emical laws to an accurate laboratory te/ & f9ds !m true1 he has ! presumption e/abli%$ t ! hi/ory1 :i* _c be s te/$1 is also true4 ,yes1 t illu/ration breaks d[n1 b only at ! po9t ( human fallibility & imp]fection4 ,if t au?or 7 omnisci5t & infallible ! illu/ration w\ld be p]fect4 ,n[ apply x to ! ,^w4 ,:5 a man1 ?r\gh ! unfail+ laboratory te/ ( hone/ fai?1 f9ds t ! /atem5ts t c be put to ! te/ ( exp]i5ce are infallible tru?1 he has n simply ! presumption b also ! absolute c]ta9ty e/abli%$ t all its o!r /atem5ts are true1 because ! infallible & omnisci5t ,au?or has giv5 x to u z ,8 ,^w4 ,x comes to u ) a ,?us sai? ! ,"l r++ 9 our e>s f beg9n+ to end1 & n ) ! multipli$ repetitions ( ,we may well suppose ( ! sci5tific guess]s4 ,! man ( sci5tific m9d1 !re=e1 w accept all ! non-exp]i5tial /atem5ts ( ! ,bible z infallible tru?1 includ+ sci5tific & hi/orical ref]5ces & prophetic utt]ances4 ,he w !n accord ! place ( primacy to all und]/ood sci5tific ref]5ces ( ! ,bible ov] all discov]ies 9 ! natural realm4 ,he w d ?is by int]pret+ ! few & fragm5t>y discov]ies ( f9ite & fallible man 9 ! light ( ! /atem5ts t come to u z ! ,^w ( an infallible ,god1 conclud+ t if !re is any app>5t inh>mony1 x lies 9 ! p>tial discov]ies or premature conclusions ( sci5ti/s1 r ?an 9 any error ( /atem5t 9 ! ,bible4 ,9 o!r words1 he w int]pret sci5ce 9 ! light ( ! ,bible1 & n ! ,bible 9 ! light ( sci5ce4 ,& if at any "t a h>moniz+ ( sci5tific discov]ies ) ! ,bible seems impossible1 he w )hold f9al conclusions until he has fur!r sci5tific light1 realiz+ t :5 he kn[s en\gh sci5ce he w !n be able to und]/& ! sci5tific ref]5ces ( ! ,bible1 & ! app>5t inh>mony w vani%4 ,multipli$ illu/rations ( ?is are s famili> t x is sc>cely necess>y to elaborate on x1 z _m w occur to ! read] :o is at all famili> ) ! ess5tial h>mony betwe5 ! ,bible & all real sci5tific k1 & ) ! fact t a multitude ( sci5tific discov]ies h be5 made1 only to f9d t ! ,bible made ref]5ce to !m 9 ! mo/ accurate sci5tific t]ms _m c5turies be=e _! discov]y4 ,a conclusion is n[ possible z to :at attitude a man :o has fai? 9 an in]rant ,bible w be compell$ to take t[>d ! !ory ( evolution4 ,:5 he sees t ! logic ( evolution de/roys e fundam5tal ,scripture doctr9e :i* he has already _h v]ifi$ to him by ! ,holy ,_s2 :5 he le>ns t evolution is n only entirely unprov5 b ev5 discr$it$ by _m compet5t m5 ( sci5ce2 & :5 he turns to ! ,bible & reads ! /atem5t repeat$ ov] & aga9 t ea* species 0 creat$ to reproduce only aft] 8 k9d2 he w be compell$ to make a *oice betwe5 evolution & an in]rant ,bible1 &1 believ+ ! ,bible1 he w reject evolution4 ,!n :5 he recalls t to ,eve1 ,satan advanc$ an unprov5 !ory :i* assum$ to int]pret1 b _h ! effect ( d5y+1 ! ,^w ( ,god1 & !n reflects t ! !ory ( evolution does precisely ! same ?+1 he w become suspici\s t ! fa!r ( lies is beh9d ! :ole evolution>y propag&a4 ,o!r !ories t are unprov5 & discr$it$ fall by _! own weight4 ,! p]si/5ce ( ?is !ory mu/ be acc\nt$ = on ! gr\nd t x c be us$ to de/roy fai? 9 ! infallibility ( ! ,bible4 ,x is q true t !re are _m :o say !y believe ! ,bible & accept evolution also4 ,b h[ ^? :o are m5tally s\nd & capable ( logical consi/5cy c accept two mutually exclusive propositions at ! same "t1 x is impossible to und]/&4 ,we w be compell$ to let ^? :o say !y accept bo? ! ,bible & evolution expla9 h[ !y d x--if !y c6 ,b meantime1 if we take pa9s to make c>eful inquiry ( su* p1 we %all f9d t 9 e case :]e logical & consi/5t ?9k+ has any mean+ :atev]1 a *oice has be5 made betwe5 ! ,bible z an in]rant & infallible ,book & ! !ory ( evolution4 ,x is q possible = a man to hold ! sci5tific or hi/orical attitude t[>d ! ,bible1 :i* makes x a human book m>r$ by _m errors1 & believe 9 evolution at ! same "t2 b ! man :o holds t attitude t[>d ! ,bible does n believe x at all6 ,no "o c accept ! !ory ( evolution & ! doctr9e ( an in]rant ,bible at ! same "t4 ,& yet ! attempt is be+ v skilfully made by _m lead]s 9 ! ,s*ools today to cam\flage ?is impossibility4 ,a v rec5t article by ,dr4 ,%ail] ,ma!ws on ,*ri/ & ,education is a typical illu/ration4 ,9 ! mid/ ( ! article ,dr4 ,ma!ws frankly indicates 8 acceptance ( evolution1 because ( :i*1 he says1 ! mean+ ( religion 0 enl>g$ = him4 ,!n he leaves ! impression ) ! read] t ! conclusions ( mod]n sci5ce are to be tak5 )\t "q1 & also t our fai? 9 ,*ri/ & ! ,bible are to be br\ght into h>mony ) ^! conclusions4 ,t is1 our fai? mu/ comb9e an acceptance ( evolution ) :atev] attitude t[>d ,*ri/ & ! ,scriptures ! evolution>y philosophy makes possible4 ,?is puts reason above ,revelation & makes ! sci5tific realm prim>y 9 its relation to ! spiritual4 ,! read] c judge1 9 ! light ( our previ\s ?9k+1 :e!r ?is proc$ure is sci5tific or n4 ,!n 9 speak+ ( ! fact t ! educat$ man z truly z ! ignorant man ne$s ! sav+ p[] ( ,*ri/1 he says3 ,b he mu/ be sav$ z an educat$ man & n z an ignorant man4 ,he _c be =c$ to give up :at he kn[s to be real4 ,if he be told t ,*ri/ian loyalty involves ! ab&onm5t ( ! assur$ results & me?ods ( sci5tific inve/igation1 he w refuse su* loyalty4 ,?is impli$ *>ge is lat] on 9 ! article made specific :5 he says t "s s*ools are refus+ to let _! /ud5ts "k ! results ( sci5tific inve/igation = fe> le/ su* k w ru9 c]ta9 !ological beliefs = :i* ! s*ools /&--a me?od he describes z putt+ a premium ^u ignorance z a pr]equisite = fai?4 ,! read] kn[s z well z ! writ] t ! :ole attitude ( ! ,*ri/ian ,*ur*1 & !re=e ( true ,*ri/ian education1 *all5ges ^? words & hurls !m back at _! au?or = pro(4 ,bo? ! impli$ & ! direct accusations are utt]ly )\t f\ndation4 ,inde$1 ! ?+ ,dr4 ,ma!ws *>ges is ! "o ?+ true ,*ri/ian education does n d4 ,:5 did ! ,*ur* ev] try to =ce a man1 educat$ or ignorant1 to give up :at he kn[s to be facts 9 ord] to become a ,*ri/ian8 ,:5 0 a man ev] ask$ by ,*ri/ian s*ools to *oose betwe5 ! assur$ results & me?ods ( sci5tific inve/igation & loyalty to ,*ri/8 ,:5 has t in/itution :i*1 above all o!rs1 has f\ght ignorance & fo/]$ true sci5tific inve/igation us$ a me?od t put a premium on ignorance z a pr]equisite = fai?8 ,x is n facts t ! ,*ur* ei!r fe>s or refuses to accept1 b su* an int]pretation ( !m by evolutioni/s & rationali/s z to d5y ! sci5tific accuracy & !re=e ! in]rancy ( ! ,^w ( ,god4 ,x is altoge!r beside ! tru? to intimate t ! ,*ur* is fo/]+ an education t has to )hold assur$ sci5tific facts = fe> _! k w\ld ru9 fai? 9 any !ological beliefs :atev] = :i* ! s*ools /&4 ,x is n ! k ( sci5tific facts t true ,*ri/ian s*ools ev] )hold1 b su* !ories & speculations conc]n+ _! mean+ z w\ld de/roy ! s*ools z ,*ri/ian in/itutions if ! logic ( !m 7 foll[$ to ! end4 ,& z = ! ,*ur* ev] ab&on+ ! assur$ results & me?ods ( sci5tific inve/igation1 ?is is precisely ! ?+ ! ,*ur* is fight+ to ma9ta9 aga9/ ! ef=ts ( evolutioni/s & rationali/s4 ,x is r ! ,s*ools t h be5 ab&on+ sci5tific me?ods ( inve/igation1 !reby rea*+ assur$ results t invalidate n only ! doctr9e ( an in]rant ,bible1 b e o!r fundam5tal doctr9e ( ! ,scriptures4 ,inde$1 ?is is ! v reason :y ! controv]sy betwe5 ! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools is n[ on1 & ,dr4 ,ma!ws' article is typical ( ! attempts t are be+ made to make x appe> t fai? 9 evolution & ! ,bible c be comb9$--an attempt t[>d :i* all believ]s 9 an infallible ,book w always be irreconcilable4 ,& ?is irreconcilable attitude is n )\t reason1 b = ! p]fectly valid reason t ! "o :o accepts evolution z a fact is utt]ly unsci5tific4 ,= 9 ! fir/ place he accepts unprov5 assumptions & rationali/ic speculations z demon/rat$ facts4 ,&1 9 ! next place1 he !reby =ces human int]pretations ( sci5tific facts to contradict ! div9ely v]ifi$ doctr9es ( ! ,bible1 ?us ?ru/+ confusion & contradiction betwe5 realms ( tru? :i* are 9 p]fect h>mony4 ,&1 /ill fur!r1 he int]prets ! ,bible 9 ! light787 n simply ( sci5ce b ev5 ( a false sci5ce1 & ?us compels unprov5 hypo!ses to d5y ! tru?fulness ( ! sci5tific & hi/orical ref]5ces ( ! ,bible1 !reby =c+ into primacy a realm ( tru? t is n prim>y4 ,& all ( ?is because he refuses to foll[ ! =mula ( ! spiritual ,textbook & put fai? above reason & ! ,bible above sci5ce 9 8 approa* to tru?4 ,h[ c a man foll[ su* me?ods & yet imag9e t he is sci5tific8 ,"o m ?+ rema9s to be said be=e ?is argum5t is complet$4 ,we />t$ out ) an unprov51 ?\gh self-evid5t premise4 ,turn back to ! v fir/ p>agraph 9 ! book & y w f9d t ! falsity ( ! pan!i/ic !ory 0 assum$ b n prov$4 ,its falsity 0 assum$ on gr\nds t h come to light z ! argum5t has proce$$1 & t might easily be turn$ to acc\nt n[ z conclusive pro(s4 ,= example1 to ref] to "o ( !m1 ! self-evid5t di/9ction betwe5 ! realm :i* conta9s ! ,creator & t :i* conta9s ,8 creation sci5ce proves to be a real div]g5ce 9 k9d by be+ compell$ to cease inve/igation ) sci5tific app>atus ! mom5t ! b\nd>y l9e ( ! spiritual realm is rea*$4 ,& if !re is z real a di/9ction betwe5 ,god & ,8 creation z ?is indicates1 ! doctr9es ( pan!ism are impossible4 ,b ! !ory ( evolution fo/]s a doctr9e ( ! imman5ce ( ,god :i* is no?+ b a mod]n =m ( pan!ism4 ,= example1 ,pr(4 ,josiah ,royce1 ( ,h>v>d1 has said3 ,god is ! _s animat+ nature1 ! univ]sal =ce :i* takes ! myriad =ms1 heat1 light1 gravitation1 electricity1 & ! l4 ,& ,pr(4 ,george ,b4 ,fo/] said3 ,god is a symbol to designate ! univ]se 9 its ideal a*iev+ capacity4 ,?is is pan!ism1 pure & simple1 = ,god & ,8 creat$ univ]se are n di/+ui%$ f ea* o!r4 ,& ?is blots out ! di/9ction betwe5 ! natural & ! spiritual realms4 ,realiz+1 !re=e1 t no matt] h[ p]fect a c\rse ( reason+ may be or h[ inevitable ! conclusions result+ x all falls l a h\se ( c>ds if ! premise is false1 x becomes necess>y to det]m9e :e!r pan!ism is false or true1 9 ord] t we may "k :e!r we />t$ ) a valid premise4 ,is pan!ism true8 ,"o ?+ we "k is true4 ,! ,bible cle>ly & %>ply di/+ui%es betwe5 ,god & ,8 creation4 ,no "o :o reads ! ,bible c diss5t f t /atem5t4 ,& pan!ism absolutely d5ies t ,bible di/9ction4 ,x !re=e imm$iately resolves itself into a "q z to :e!r ! ,bible is true4 ,?is br+s u /raight back to ,*ri/'s =mula--,if any man wills to d1 he %all "k4 ,he :o accepts ! *all5ge ( ?is =mula w come to "k1 beyond all possibility ( dispro(1 t nei!r pan!ism1 evolution1 nor any o!r doctr9e t d5ies or ca/s d\bt on ! infallibility ( ! ,bible is true4 ,he w "k x because x is sup]naturally v]ifi$ to him 9 answ] to 8 fai?4 ,?is =mula is ! div9e *all5ge to e =m ( unbelief 9 an in]rant ,bible4 ,!re nev] has be5 an h\r s9ce ,p5teco/ :5 ! aggressive hurl+ ( ?is *all5ge at defiant & de/ructive unbelief 0 m ne$$4 ,& ! :ole ,*ri/ian ,*ur*1 back$ by ! ,^w ( ,god1 is hurl+ ?is *all5ge back into ! tee? ( ! :ole evolution>y camp today4 ,ei!r be fair en\gh1 be sci5tific en\gh1 be hone/ en\gh1 *all5ges ! ,*ur*1 to act ^u ,*ri/'s =mula & ga9 = y\rselves t sup]naturally v]ifi$ k :i* w make fur!r fai? 9 ! evolution>y !ory impossible1 or else d n assume to pron\nce any fur!r on ^? tru?s ( :i* y "k no?+ because y h be5 unwill+ to take ! means to f9d out :at !y are4 ,g & jo9 ! ranks ( ! o!r unbeliev]s & ,bible-rejectors1 tak+ y\r d\bt-born !ories ) y z a re9=cem5t to _! w>f>e aga9/ ! ,bible1 & !n ! ,*ur* c fight y 9 ! op5 & drive y to defeat ) ! ,sword ( ! ,_s1 :i* is ! ,^w ( ,god4 ,if y are det]m9$ to de/roy fai? 9 ! in]rancy ( ! ,bible1 at lea/ be fair en\gh to come out f "u ! cov] ( ,*ri/ian education1 & /op assum+ to int]pret 9 ! light ( evolution--a light t is d>kness--^? sublime doctr9es :i* are at once ! f\ndation & ! message ( ! ,*ur*4 ,get out ( ! ,*ri/ian s*ools1 :i* 7 f\nd$ to /r5g!n1 n to de/roy1 ! fai? ( "y p f ,*ri/ian homes1 & give place to ^? :o believe ! ,book4 ,increas+ ho/s ( ,*ri/ian p>5ts are too he>t-brok5 ov] ! invasion ( _! own homes by ?is de/roy+ wolf 9 %eep's clo?+ to tol]ate ?is situation mu* long]4 ,!y are ask+1 9 ! words ( a ,*icago newspap] editorial conc]n+ ! de/ructive tea*+s ( ,pr(4 ,george ,b4 ,fo/]1 9 ! ,*icago ,univ]sity ,div9ity ,s*ool3 ,is !re no place to assail ,*ri/ianity b a div9ity s*ool8 ,is !re no "o to write infidel books except ! pr(essors ( ,*ri/ian !ology8 ,is a !ological sem9>y an appropriate place = a g5]al massacre ( ,*ri/ian doctr9e8 ,& !n ! s5tim5t t foll[s 9 ! next s5t5ce is %>$ increas+ly by multitudes 9 ! ,*ur* 9 proportion z ^! de/roy]s become increas+ly aggressive 9 _! "w ( de/ruction4 ,! editor cont9ues3 ,mr4 ,mangas>ian deliv]s infidel lectures e ,sunday 9 ,or*e/ra ,hall & no "o is %ock$1 b :5 ! pr(ess$ def5d]s ( ,*ri/ianity jump on x & assass9ate x1 ! public--ev5 ! agno/ic public1 _c b despise !m4 ,ei!r be sci5tific en\gh1 cry believ]s to ! evolutioni/s1 to accept ! *all5ge ( ,*ri/'s =mula ) all its implications1 or be hone/ en\gh to cease de/roy+ ! fai? 9 an in]rant ,bible y h sworn to def5d b refuse to accept6 ,! ,*ur* is also hurl+ ! *all5ge ( ,*ri/'s =mula at e o!r =m ( aggressive unbelief4 ,no unbeliev]1 f de/ructive ,high] ,critic to agno/ic & infidel1 has ! %ad[ ( a "r to make contr>y pron\ncem5t on ! in]rancy & infallible au?ority ( ! ,bible1 = he has refus$ to put ,*ri/'s ^w to ! te/1--8 unbelief proves x1--& he is !re=e utt]ly incapacitat$ = pass+ any judgm5t :atev] on t ,book :i* unfolds its mean+ to fai? alone4 ,& z to ! controv]sy betwe5 ! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools1 ! evolutioni/s mu/ quit ei!r evolution or ! ,*ri/ian s*ools1 or ! controv]sy c 9 no way be cur$4 ,= h[ c fai? 9 an in]rant ,bible & unbelief 9 its in]rancy abide 9 h>mony 9 ! same h\se8 ,9 ! v nature ( ?+s1 two gr\ps :o hold su* absolutely antagoni/ic positions mu/ ei!r "p company or cont9ue ! controv]sy born ( ! antagonism4 ,! true ,*ur* always has believ$1 & always w believe1 9 an in]rant ,^w ( ,god1 & %e _c h>bor )9 h] ranks any gr\p ( p1 no matt] by :at "n !y g1 :o d n take _! /& )\t equivocation on t same gr\nd4 ,if reason = ?is intol]ance is ask$1 x w appe> 9 ! light ( "s que/ions ask$ by ,dr4 ,joseph ,p>k]4 ,^! que/ions are3 ,if ! ,bible is wrong 9 hi/ory1 :at gu>antee is !re t x is "r 9 morals8 ,if ! ,bible is n a reliable guide 9 facts1 h[ d we "k t x is a tru/wor?y guide 9 doctr9e8 ,h[ev] he may h arriv$ at 8 conclusions1 x is extremely significant1 9 ! light ( ^! que/ions1 t ,dr4 ,e4 ,d4 ,burton1 be+ will+ to admit t ! ,bible is n infallible 9 hi/ory or 9 matt]s ( sci5ce1 has also conclud$ t x is n :olly consi/5t & !re=e n ultimately & z a :ole in]rant 9 ! field ( morals & religion4 ,:at reason m c ! ,*ur* want to ju/ify h] = intol]ance ( a !ory t w d ?is to a man's fai?8 ,is x n correct reason+ to conclude t if "o man suff]s su* a collapse ( fai? aft] accept+ evolution1 o!rs are likely to suff] ! same ?+8 ,& :5 ! ,*ur* obs]ves ?is collapse tak+ place 9 e qu>t]1 & !n discov]s t back ( x lies ! !ory ( evolution1 is %e n ju/ifi$ = be+ intol]ant ( t ?+ :i* is gnaw+ at ! vitals ( h] fai?8 ,:at c %e say else ?an t ! tea*]s ( evolution1 at lea/ 9 ! ,*ri/ian s*ools1 mu/ ei!r give up evolution & come back to fai? 9 an infallible ,bible1 or "p company ) ! ,*ur*8 ,x may be t "o reason :y ! evolutioni/s are s lo? to get out ( company !y d n belong 9 is because !y fe> t !reby !y may lose _! covet$ reputation = s*ol>%ip4 ,pr(4 ,h[>d ,w4 ,kellogg1 =m]ly ( ,occid5tal ,college1 h9ts z mu* :5 he says3 ,sci5ce has aga9 & aga9 set aside z untru/wor?y ! s-call$ discov]ies ( evolution1 has compell$ ! great ,g]man evolutioni/1 ,haeckel1 to confess t 8 draw+s ( miss+ l9ks 7 f imag9ation r ?an f objects f\nd1 has driv5 him f 8 univ]sity *air1 & has compell$ him to admit t ,mo/ mod]n inve/igators ( sci5ce h come to ! conclusion t ! doctr9e ( evolution1 & p>ticul>ly ( ,d>w9ism1 is 9 error & _c be ma9ta9$1--& yet 9 spite ( su* admissions f m5 recogniz$ z au?orities 9 _! respective l9es1 ! doctr9e ( evolution appe>s to rule z absolutely 9 ! educational _w z if x 7 n a moribund hypo!sis1 already disc>d$ by _m1 & to be disc>d$ by o!rs :5 sci5tific evid5ce r ?an reputation = s*ol>%ip is all[$ ! decid+ voice4 ,b :atev] ! actuat+ motive may be t has kept ! evolutioni/s f giv+ up _! uns*ol>ly & unsci5tific !ory1 true believ]s 9 ! ,^w long to see !m d :at ,h5ry ,drummond1 t brilliant sci5ti/1 did be=e he di$4 ,on 8 dea?b$ he said to ,sir ,william ,dawson1 z report$ 9 ?is c\ntry 9 ! writ]'s he>+ by ,dr4 ,john ,rob]tson directly f ! lips ( ,dawson3 ,i am go+ away back to ! ,book to believe x & receive x z ,i did at ! fir/4 ,i c live no long] on unc]ta9ties4 ,i am go+ back to ! fai? ( ! ,^w ( ,god4 ,:5 bo? ! ,*ur* & ! ,s*ools consi/5tly & s9c]ely take ?is attitude t[>d ! ,bible1 ! controv]sy w be end$ 9 ! "o way 9 :i* ! ,*ur* longs to see x end4 ,pr9t$ 9 ! ,unit$ ,/ates ( ,am]ica ,,div9e ,,dynamite ,by ,j4 ,e4 ,,conant1 ,d4,d4 ,a /irr+ address to ! ,*ur*1 plead+ ! ne$1 ! s\rce1 & ! op]ation ( p[] f on ,high1 :i* %e ne$s above ! p[] ( eloqu5ce1 ( music1 ( sociability1 ( organization1 & ( money4 ,a ,,repres5tative ,,te/imonial ,?is ord] confirms my wire ( ev5 date1 ',please mail to-day fifty ,div9e ,dynamite1' & be/ expresses :at ,i ?9k ( ! book s9ce read+ x4 ,f4,d4,s41 ,dav5port1 ,i[a ,art ,/ock ,cov]s1 #bj c5ts1 po/paid ------ ,i h be5 s5d+ ?is book ar\nd to p :o1 ,i ?\ght1 ought to read x4--,william ,j5n+s ,bryan4 ,! ,o!r ,side ( ,evolution ,its ,effects & ,fallacy ,by ,alex&] ,patt]son1 ,d4,d4 ,) an introduction by ! late ,george ,fr$]ick ,wright1 ! em95t geologi/ ( ,ob]l94 ,,cont5ts page ,preface4 ,claims & ,influ5ce ( ,evolution vii ,introduction4 ,! ,mean+ ( ,evolution xix ,*apt] ,i ,evolution ,is an ,unprov$ ,!ory #e ,*apt] ,,ii ,evolution ( ! ,univ]se & ,e>? #ag ,*apt] ,,iii ,evolution ( ,species #bf ,*apt] ,,iv ,evolution ( ,man #fj ,*apt] ,v ,evolution ,unsci5tific & ,unphilosophical #aab ,*apt] ,,vi ,evolution & ! ,bible #abj ,*apt] ,,vii ,spiritual ,effect ( ,evolution #acg #abmo1 clo? b9d+1 #a4jf1 po/paid ,!re is m happ9ess 9 br++ s\ls back to ,god ?an 9 ?ree presid5tial nom9ations4--,william ,j5n+s ,bryan ,,! ,,bible ,,& ,,its ,,enemies ,by ,,william ,,j5n+s ,,bryan ,writt5 t ! p %all n be robb$ ( _! fai? 9 ,god4 ,= he t come? to ,god mu/ believe t ,he ,,is4--,heb4 #aa3f4 ,!re is a great /ir 9 ! camp ( ! ,a!i/1 ! ,agno/ic1 ! ,high] ,critic & p>ticul>ly ! ,evolutioni/1 because ( ?is mod]n ,david--,am]ica's ,glad/one--,william ,j5n+s ,bryan6 ,! he>t ( e true ,*ri/ian rejoices because ! enemies ( our c\ntry & ( our ,god & ,savi\r are s pla9ly po9t$ out by ?is bold & mighty *ampion ( ! ,book4 ,read--,di/ribute--,recomm5d ?is attractive & compell+ booklet4 ,pa/ors1 ,educators1 ,/ud5ts1 ,p>5ts--y _c ignore ?is great message6 ,art ,/ock ,cov]s1 #abmo1 #be c5ts1 po/paid4 ,,:at ,,ab\t ,,evolution8 ,by ,w4 ,h4 ,,griffi? ,,?omas1 ,d4,d4 ,"s ?\ghts on ! relation ( ,evolution to ! ,bible & ,*ri/ianity1 by a =m] fell[ ( ,ox=d & ,pr9cipal ( ,wycliffe ,college1 ,toronto4 ,a neatly pr9t$ pamphlet1 #aj c5ts1 po/paid ,,! ,,bible ,,in/itute ,,colportage ,,ass',n #hbf ,nor? ,la ,salle ,/reet1 ,*icago 99 99 99 99 99 ,transcrib]'s note3 ,page #aa ,! ^w none has be5 *ang$ to no 9 none effect by a non-bellig]5t4 ,page #cb ,duplicate ( remov$ f ! doctr9es ( ( ! ,deity4 ,page #hh ,add$ a p]iod to ! end ( ! quote f9i%+ ) 444 morals & religion4 ,page #ia ,! pr9t]'s "n & adress 7 remov$4 ,!y appe> at ! end ( ! adv]tism5ts4