,,the ,,augsburg ,,confession ,the ,confession of ,faith3 ,which ,was ,submitted to ,his ,imperial ,majesty ,charles ,v ,at the ,diet of ,augsburg in the ,year #aecj by ,philip ,melanchthon1 #adig-aefj ,,preface ,,to ,,the ,,emperor ,,charles ,v4 ,most ,invincible ,emperor1 ,caesar ,augustus1 ,most ,clement ,lord3 ,inasmuch as ,your ,imperial ,majesty has summoned a ,diet of the ,empire here at ,augsburg to deliberate concerning measures against the ,turk1 that most atrocious1 hereditary1 and ancient enemy of the ,christian name and religion1 in what way1 namely1 effectually to withstand his furor and assaults by strong and lasting military provision2 and then also concerning dissensions in the matter of our holy religion and ,christian ,faith1 that in this matter of religion the opinions and judgments of the parties might be heard in each other's presence2 and considered and weighed among ourselves in mutual charity1 leniency1 and kindness1 in order that1 after the removal and correction of such things as have been treated and understood in a different manner in the writings on either side1 these matters may be settled and brought back to one simple truth and ,christian concord1 that for the future one pure and true religion may be embraced and maintained by us1 that as we all are under one ,christ and do battle under ,him1 so we may be able also to live in unity and concord in the one ,christian ,church4 ,and inasmuch as we1 the undersigned ,elector and ,princes1 with others joined with us1 have been called to the aforesaid ,diet the same as the other ,electors1 ,princes1 and ,estates1 in obedient compliance with the ,imperial mandate1 we have promptly come to ,augsburg1 and--what we do not mean to say as boasting--we were among the first to be here4 ,accordingly1 since even here at ,augsburg at the very beginning of the ,diet1 ,your ,imperial ,majesty caused to be proposed to the ,electors1 ,princes1 and other ,estates of the ,empire1 amongst other things1 that the several ,estates of the ,empire1 on the strength of the ,imperial edict1 should set forth and submit their opinions and judgments in the ,german and the ,latin language1 and since on the ensuing ,wednesday1 answer was given to ,your ,imperial ,majesty1 after due deliberation1 that we would submit the ,articles of our ,confession for our side on next ,wednesday1 therefore1 in obedience to ,your ,imperial ,majesty's wishes1 we offer1 in this matter of religion1 the ,confession of our preachers and of ourselves1 showing what manner of doctrine from the ,holy ,scriptures and the pure ,word of ,god has been up to this time set forth in our lands1 dukedoms1 dominions1 and cities1 and taught in our churches4 ,and if the other ,electors1 ,princes1 and ,estates of the ,empire will1 according to the said ,imperial proposition1 present similar writings1 to wit1 in ,latin and ,german1 giving their opinions in this matter of religion1 we1 with the ,princes and friends aforesaid1 here before ,your ,imperial ,majesty1 our most clement ,lord are prepared to confer amicably concerning all possible ways and means1 in order that we may come together1 as far as this may be honorably done1 and1 the matter between us on both sides being peacefully discussed without offensive strife1 the dissension1 by ,god's help1 may be done away and brought back to one true accordant religion2 for as we all are under one ,christ and do battle under ,him1 we ought to confess the one ,christ1 after the tenor of ,your ,imperial ,majesty's edict1 and everything ought to be conducted according to the truth of ,god2 and this it is what1 with most fervent prayers1 we entreat of ,god4 ,however1 as regards the rest of the ,electors1 ,princes1 and ,estates1 who constitute the other part1 if no progress should be made1 nor some result be attained by this treatment of the cause of religion after the manner in which ,your ,imperial ,majesty has wisely held that it should be dealt with and treated namely1 by such mutual presentation of writings and calm conferring together among ourselves1 we at least leave with you a clear testimony1 that we here in no wise are holding back from anything that could bring about ,christian concord1--such as could be effected with ,god and a good conscience1--as also ,your ,imperial ,majesty and1 next1 the other ,electors and ,estates of the ,empire1 and all who are moved by sincere love and zeal for religion1 and who will give an impartial hearing to this matter1 will graciously deign to take notice and to understand this from this ,confession of ours and of our associates4 ,your ,imperial ,majesty also1 not only once but often1 graciously signified to the ,electors ,princes1 and ,estates of the ,empire1 and at the ,diet of ,spires held ,a4 ,d4 #aebf1 according to the form of ,your ,imperial instruction and commission given and prescribed1 caused it to be stated and publicly proclaimed that ,your ,majesty1 in dealing with this matter of religion1 for certain reasons which were alleged in ,your ,majesty's name1 was not willing to decide and could not determine anything1 but that ,your ,majesty would diligently use ,your ,majesty's office with the ,roman ,pontiff for the convening of a ,general ,council4 ,the same matter was thus publicly set forth at greater length a year ago at the last ,diet which met at ,spires4 ,there ,your ,imperial ,majesty1 through ,his ,highness ,ferdinand1 ,king of ,bohemia and ,hungary1 our friend and clement ,lord1 as well as through the ,orator and ,imperial ,commissioners caused this1 among other things1 to be submitted3 that ,your ,imperial ,majesty had taken notice of2 and pondered1 the resolution of ,your ,majesty's ,representative in the ,empire1 and of the ,president and ,imperial ,counselors1 and the ,legates from other ,estates convened at ,ratisbon1 concerning the calling of a ,council1 and that your ,imperial ,majesty also judged it to be expedient to convene a ,council2 and that ,your ,imperial ,majesty did not doubt the ,roman ,pontiff could be induced to hold a ,general ,council1 because the matters to be adjusted between ,your ,imperial ,majesty and the ,roman ,pontiff were nearing agreement and ,christian reconciliation2 therefore ,your ,imperial ,majesty himself signified that he would endeavor to secure the said ,chief ,pontiff's consent for convening1 together with your ,imperial ,majesty such ,general ,council1 to be published as soon as possible by letters that were to be sent out4 ,if the outcome1 therefore1 should be such that the differences between us and the other parties in the matter of religion should not be amicably and in charity settled1 then here1 before ,your ,imperial ,majesty we make the offer in all obedience1 in addition to what we have already done1 that we will all appear and defend our cause in such a general1 free ,christian ,council1 for the convening of which there has always been accordant action and agreement of votes in all the ,imperial ,diets held during ,your ,majesty's reign1 on the part of the ,electors1 ,princes1 and other ,estates of the ,empire4 ,to the assembly of this ,general ,council1 and at the same time to ,your ,imperial ,majesty1 we have1 even before this1 in due manner and form of law1 addressed ourselves and made appeal in this matter1 by far the greatest and gravest4 ,to this appeal1 both to ,your ,imperial ,majesty and to a ,council1 we still adhere2 neither do we intend nor would it be possible for us1 to relinquish it by this or any other document1 unless the matter between us and the other side1 according to the tenor of the latest ,imperial citation should be amicably and charitably settled1 allayed1 and brought to ,christian concord2 and regarding this we even here solemnly and publicly testify4 ,article ,i3 ,of ,god4 ,our ,churches1 with common consent1 do teach that the decree of the ,council of ,nicaea concerning the ,unity of the ,divine ,essence and concerning the ,three ,persons1 is true and to be believed without any doubting2 that is to say1 there is one ,divine ,essence which is called and which is ,god3 eternal1 without body1 without parts1 of infinite power1 wisdom1 and goodness1 the ,maker and ,preserver of all things1 visible and invisible2 and yet there are three ,persons1 of the same essence and power1 who also are coeternal1 the ,father the ,son1 and the ,holy ,ghost4 ,and the term person they use as the ,fathers have used it1 to signify1 not a part or quality in another1 but that which subsists of itself4 ,they condemn all heresies which have sprung up against this article1 as the ,manichaeans1 who assumed two principles1 one ,good and the other ,evil--also the ,valentinians1 ,arians1 ,eunomians1 ,mohammedans1 and all such4 ,they condemn also the ,samosatenes1 old and new1 who1 contending that there is but one ,person1 sophistically and impiously argue that the ,word and the ,holy ,ghost are not distinct ,persons1 but that ,word signifies a spoken word1 and ,spirit signifies motion created in things4 ,article ,,ii3 ,of ,original ,sin4 ,also they teach that since the fall of ,adam all men begotten in the natural way are born with sin1 that is1 without the fear of ,god1 without trust in ,god1 and with concupiscence2 and that this disease1 or vice of origin1 is truly sin1 even now condemning and bringing eternal death upon those not born again through ,baptism and the ,holy ,ghost4 ,they ,condemn the ,pelagians and others who deny that original depravity is sin1 and who1 to obscure the glory of ,christ's merit and benefits1 argue that man can be justified before ,god by his own strength and reason4 ,article ,,iii3 ,of the ,son of ,god4 ,also they teach that the ,word1 that is1 the ,son of ,god1 did assume the human nature in the womb of the blessed ,virgin ,mary1 so that there are two natures1 the divine and the human1 inseparably enjoined in one ,person1 one ,christ1 true ,god and true man1 who was born of the ,virgin ,mary1 truly suffered1 was crucified1 dead1 and buried1 that ,he might reconcile the ,father unto us1 and be a sacrifice1 not only for original guilt1 but also for all actual sins of men4 ,he also descended into hell1 and truly rose again the third day2 afterward ,he ascended into heaven that ,he might sit on the right hand of the ,father1 and forever reign and have dominion over all creatures1 and sanctify them that believe in ,him1 by sending the ,holy ,ghost into their hearts1 to rule1 comfort1 and quicken them1 and to defend them against the devil and the power of sin4 ,the same ,christ shall openly come again to judge the quick and the dead1 etc41 according to the ,apostles' ,creed4 ,article ,,iv3 ,of ,justification4 ,also they teach that men cannot be justified before ,god by their own strength1 merits1 or works1 but are freely justified for ,christ's sake1 through faith1 when they believe that they are received into favor1 and that their sins are forgiven for ,christ's sake1 who1 by ,his death1 has made satisfaction for our sins4 ,this faith ,god imputes for righteousness in ,his sight4 ,rom4 #c and #d4 ,article ,v3 ,of the ,ministry4 ,that we may obtain this faith1 the ,ministry of ,teaching the ,gospel and administering the ,sacraments was instituted4 ,for through the ,word and ,sacraments1 as through instruments1 the ,holy ,ghost is given1 who works faith2 where and when it pleases ,god1 in them that hear the ,gospel1 to wit1 that ,god1 not for our own merits1 but for ,christ's sake1 justifies those who believe that they are received into grace for ,christ's sake4 ,they condemn the ,anabaptists and others who think that the ,holy ,ghost comes to men without the external ,word1 through their own preparations and works4 ,article ,,vi3 ,of ,new ,obedience4 ,also they teach that this faith is bound to bring forth good fruits1 and that it is necessary to do good works commanded by ,god1 because of ,god's will1 but that we should not rely on those works to merit justification before ,god4 ,for remission of sins and justification is apprehended by faith1 as also the voice of ,christ attests3 ,when ye shall have done all these things1 say3 ,we are unprofitable servants4 ,luke #ag1 #aj4 ,the same is also taught by the ,fathers4 ,for ,ambrose says3 ,it is ordained of ,god that he who believes in ,christ is saved1 freely receiving remission of sins1 without works1 by faith alone4 ,article ,,vii3 ,of the ,church4 ,also they teach that one holy ,church is to continue forever4 ,the ,church is the congregation of saints1 in which the ,gospel is rightly taught and the ,sacraments are rightly administered4 ,and to the true unity of the ,church it is enough to agree concerning the doctrine of the ,gospel and the administration of the ,sacraments4 ,nor is it necessary that human traditions1 that is1 rites or ceremonies1 instituted by men1 should be everywhere alike4 ,as ,paul says3 ,one faith1 one ,baptism1 one ,god and ,father of all1 etc4 ,eph4 #d1 #e4 #f4 ,article ,,viii3 ,what the ,church ,is4 ,although the ,church properly is the congregation of saints and true believers1 nevertheless1 since in this life many hypocrites and evil persons are mingled therewith1 it is lawful to use ,sacraments administered by evil men1 according to the saying of ,christ3 ,the ,scribes and the ,pharisees sit in ,moses' seat1 etc4 ,matt4 #bc1 #b4 ,both the ,sacraments and ,word are effectual by reason of the institution and commandment of ,christ1 notwithstanding they be administered by evil men4 ,they condemn the ,donatists1 and such like1 who denied it to be lawful to use the ministry of evil men in the ,church1 and who thought the ministry of evil men to be unprofitable and of none effect4 ,article ,,ix3 ,of ,baptism4 ,of ,baptism they teach that it is necessary to salvation1 and that through ,baptism is offered the grace of ,god1 and that children are to be baptized who1 being offered to ,god through ,baptism are received into ,god's grace4 ,they condemn the ,anabaptists1 who reject the baptism of children1 and say that children are saved without ,baptism4 ,article ,x3 ,of the ,lord's ,supper4 ,of the ,supper of the ,lord they teach that the ,body and ,blood of ,christ are truly present1 and are distributed to those who eat the ,supper of the ,lord2 and they reject those that teach otherwise4 ,article ,,xi3 ,of ,confession4 ,of ,confession they teach that ,private ,absolution ought to be retained in the churches1 although in confession an enumeration of all sins is not necessary4 ,for it is impossible according to the ,psalm3 ,who can understand his errors8 ,ps4 #ai1 #ab4 ,article ,,xii3 ,of ,repentance4 ,of ,repentance they teach that for those who have fallen after ,baptism there is remission of sins whenever they are converted and that the ,church ought to impart absolution to those thus returning to repentance4 ,now1 repentance consists properly of these two parts3 ,one is contrition1 that is1 terrors smiting the conscience through the knowledge of sin2 the other is faith1 which is born of the ,gospel1 or of absolution1 and believes that for ,christ's sake1 sins are forgiven1 comforts the conscience1 and delivers it from terrors4 ,then good works are bound to follow1 which are the fruits of repentance4 ,they condemn the ,anabaptists1 who deny that those once justified can lose the ,holy ,ghost4 ,also those who contend that some may attain to such perfection in this life that they cannot sin4 ,the ,novatians also are condemned1 who would not absolve such as had fallen after ,baptism1 though they returned to repentance4 ,they also are rejected who do not teach that remission of sins comes through faith but command us to merit grace through satisfactions of our own4 ,article ,,xiii3 ,of the ,use of the ,sacraments4 ,of the ,use of the ,sacraments they teach that the ,sacraments were ordained1 not only to be marks of profession among men1 but rather to be signs and testimonies of the will of ,god toward us1 instituted to awaken and confirm faith in those who use them4 ,wherefore we must so use the ,sacraments that faith be added to believe the promises which are offered and set forth through the ,sacraments4 ,they therefore condemn those who teach that the ,sacraments justify by the outward act1 and who do not teach that1 in the use of the ,sacraments1 faith which believes that sins are forgiven1 is required4 ,article ,,xiv3 ,of ,ecclesiastical ,order4 ,of ,ecclesiastical ,order they teach that no one should publicly teach in the ,church or administer the ,sacraments unless he be regularly called4 ,article ,,xv3 ,of ,ecclesiastical ,usages4 ,of ,usages in the ,church they teach that those ought to be observed which may be observed without sin1 and which are profitable unto tranquillity and good order in the ,church1 as particular holy-days1 festivals1 and the like4 ,nevertheless1 concerning such things men are admonished that consciences are not to be burdened1 as though such observance was necessary to salvation4 ,they are admonished also that human traditions instituted to propitiate ,god1 to merit grace1 and to make satisfaction for sins1 are opposed to the ,gospel and the doctrine of faith4 ,wherefore vows and traditions concerning meats and days1 etc41 instituted to merit grace and to make satisfaction for sins1 are useless and contrary to the ,gospel4 ,article ,,xvi3 ,of ,civil ,affairs4 ,of ,civil ,affairs they teach that lawful civil ordinances are good works of ,god1 and that it is right for ,christians to bear civil office1 to sit as judges1 to judge matters by the ,imperial and other existing laws1 to award just punishments1 to engage in just wars1 to serve as soldiers1 to make legal contracts1 to hold property1 to make oath when required by the magistrates1 to marry a wife1 to be given in marriage4 ,they condemn the ,anabaptists who forbid these civil offices to ,christians4 ,they condemn also those who do not place evangelical perfection in the fear of ,god and in faith1 but in forsaking civil offices1 for the ,gospel teaches an eternal righteousness of the heart4 ,meanwhile1 it does not destroy the ,state or the family1 but very much requires that they be preserved as ordinances of ,god1 and that charity be practiced in such ordinances4 ,therefore1 ,christians are necessarily bound to obey their own magistrates and laws save only when commanded to sin2 for then they ought to obey ,god rather than men4 ,acts #e1 #bi4 ,article ,,xvii3 ,of ,christ's ,return to ,judgment4 ,also they teach that at the ,consummation of the ,world ,christ will appear for judgment and will raise up all the dead2 ,he will give to the godly and elect eternal life and everlasting joys1 but ungodly men and the devils ,he will condemn to be tormented without end4 ,they condemn the ,anabaptists1 who think that there will be an end to the punishments of condemned men and devils4 ,they condemn also others who are now spreading certain ,jewish opinions1 that before the resurrection of the dead the godly shall take possession of the kingdom of the world1 the ungodly being everywhere suppressed4 ,article ,,xviii3 ,of ,free ,will4 ,of ,free ,will they teach that man's will has some liberty to choose civil righteousness1 and to work things subject to reason4 ,but it has no power1 without the ,holy ,ghost1 to work the righteousness of ,god1 that is1 spiritual righteousness2 since the natural man receiveth not the things of the ,spirit of ,god1 #a ,cor4 #b1ad2 but this righteousness is wrought in the heart when the ,holy ,ghost is received through the ,word4 ,these things are said in as many words by ,augustine in his ,hypognosticon1 ,book ,,iii3 ,we grant that all men have a free will1 free1 inasmuch as it has the judgment of reason2 not that it is thereby capable1 without ,god1 either to begin1 or1 at least1 to complete aught in things pertaining to ,god1 but only in works of this life1 whether good or evil4 ,good ,i call those works which spring from the good in nature1 such as1 willing to labor in the field1 to eat and drink1 to have a friend1 to clothe oneself1 to build a house1 to marry a wife1 to raise cattle1 to learn divers useful arts1 or whatsoever good pertains to this life4 ,for all of these things are not without dependence on the providence of ,god2 yea1 of ,him and through ,him they are and have their being4 ,evil ,i call such works as willing to worship an idol1 to commit murder1 etc4 ,they condemn the ,pelagians and others1 who teach that without the ,holy ,ghost1 by the power of nature alone1 we are able to love ,god above all things2 also to do the commandments of ,god as touching the substance of the act4 ,for1 although nature is able in a manner to do the outward work1 7for it is able to keep the hands from theft and murder17 yet it cannot produce the inward motions1 such as the fear of ,god1 trust in ,god1 chastity1 patience1 etc4 ,article ,,xix3 ,of the ,cause of ,sin4 ,of the ,cause of ,sin they teach that1 although ,god does create and preserve nature1 yet the cause of sin is the will of the wicked1 that is1 of the devil and ungodly men2 which will1 unaided of ,god1 turns itself from ,god1 as ,christ says ,john #h1 #dd3 ,when he speaketh a lie1 he speaketh of his own4 ,article ,,xx3 ,of ,good ,works4 ,our teachers are falsely accused of forbidding good ,works4 ,for their published writings on the ,ten ,commandments1 and others of like import1 bear witness that they have taught to good purpose concerning all estates and duties of life1 as to what estates of life and what works in every calling be pleasing to ,god4 ,concerning these things preachers heretofore taught but little1 and urged only childish and needless works1 as particular holy-days1 particular fasts1 brotherhoods1 pilgrimages1 services in honor of saints1 the use of rosaries1 monasticism1 and such like4 ,since our adversaries have been admonished of these things1 they are now unlearning them1 and do not preach these unprofitable works as heretofore4 ,besides1 they begin to mention faith1 of which there was heretofore marvelous silence4 ,they teach that we are justified not by works only1 but they conjoin faith and works1 and say that we are justified by faith and works4 ,this doctrine is more tolerable than the former one1 and can afford more consolation than their old doctrine4 ,forasmuch1 therefore1 as the doctrine concerning faith1 which ought to be the chief one in the ,church1 has lain so long unknown1 as all must needs grant that there was the deepest silence in their sermons concerning the righteousness of faith1 while only the doctrine of works was treated in the churches1 our teachers have instructed the churches concerning faith as follows3-- ,first1 that our works cannot reconcile ,god or merit forgiveness of sins1 grace1 and justification1 but that we obtain this only by faith when we believe that we are received into favor for ,christs sake1 who alone has been set forth the ,mediator and ,propitiation1 #a ,tim4 #b1 #f1 in order that the ,father may be reconciled through ,him4 ,whoever1 therefore1 trusts that by works he merits grace1 despises the merit and grace of ,christ1 and seeks a way to ,god without ,christ1 by human strength1 although ,christ has said of ,himself3 ,i am the ,way1 the ,truth1 and the ,life4 ,john #ad1 #f4 ,this doctrine concerning faith is everywhere treated by ,paul1 ,eph4 #b1 #h3 ,by grace are ye saved through faith2 and that not of yourselves2 it is the gift of ,god1 not of works1 etc4 ,and lest any one should craftily say that a new interpretation of ,paul has been devised by us1 this entire matter is supported by the testimonies of the ,fathers4 ,for ,augustine1 in many volumes1 defends grace and the righteousness of faith1 over against the merits of works4 ,and ,ambrose1 in his ,de ,vocatione ,gentium1 and elsewhere1 teaches to like effect4 ,for in his ,de ,vocatione ,gentium he says as follows3 ,redemption by the blood of ,christ would become of little value1 neither would the preeminence of man's works be superseded by the mercy of ,god1 if justification1 which is wrought through grace1 were due to the merits going before1 so as to be1 not the free gift of a donor1 but the reward due to the laborer4 ,but1 although this doctrine is despised by the inexperienced1 nevertheless ,god-fearing and anxious consciences find by experience that it brings the greatest consolation1 because consciences cannot be set at rest through any works1 but only by faith1 when they take the sure ground that for ,christ's sake they have a reconciled ,god4 ,as ,paul teaches ,rom4 #e1 #a3 ,being justified by faith1 we have peace with ,god4 ,this whole doctrine is to be referred to that conflict of the terrified conscience1 neither can it be understood apart from that conflict4 ,therefore inexperienced and profane men judge ill concerning this matter1 who dream that ,christian righteousness is nothing but civil and philosophical righteousness4 ,heretofore consciences were plagued with the doctrine of works1 they did not hear the consolation from the ,gospel4 ,some persons were driven by conscience into the desert1 into monasteries hoping there to merit grace by a monastic life4 ,some also devised other works whereby to merit grace and make satisfaction for sins4 ,hence there was very great need to treat of1 and renew1 this doctrine of faith in ,christ1 to the end that anxious consciences should not be without consolation but that they might know that grace and forgiveness of sins and justification are apprehended by faith in ,christ4 ,men are also admonished that here the term faith does not signify merely the knowledge of the history1 such as is in the ungodly and in the devil1 but signifies a faith which believes1 not merely the history1 but also the effect of the history--namely1 this ,article3 the forgiveness of sins1 to wit1 that we have grace1 righteousness1 and forgiveness of sins through ,christ4 ,now he that knows that he has a ,father gracious to him through ,christ1 truly knows ,god2 he knows also that ,god cares for him1 and calls upon ,god2 in a word1 he is not without ,god1 as the heathen4 ,for devils and the ungodly are not able to believe this ,article3 the forgiveness of sins4 ,hence1 they hate ,god as an enemy1 call not upon ,him1 and expect no good from ,him4 ,augustine also admonishes his readers concerning the word faith1 and teaches that the term faith is accepted in the ,scriptures not for knowledge such as is in the ungodly but for confidence which consoles and encourages the terrified mind4 ,furthermore1 it is taught on our part that it is necessary to do good works1 not that we should trust to merit grace by them1 but because it is the will of ,god4 ,it is only by faith that forgiveness of sins is apprehended1 and that1 for nothing4 ,and because through faith the ,holy ,ghost is received1 hearts are renewed and endowed with new affections1 so as to be able to bring forth good works4 ,for ,ambrose says3 ,faith is the mother of a good will and right doing4 ,for man's powers without the ,holy ,ghost are full of ungodly affections1 and are too weak to do works which are good in ,god's sight4 ,besides1 they are in the power of the devil who impels men to divers sins1 to ungodly opinions1 to open crimes4 ,this we may see in the philosophers1 who1 although they endeavored to live an honest life could not succeed1 but were defiled with many open crimes4 ,such is the feebleness of man when he is without faith and without the ,holy ,ghost1 and governs himself only by human strength4 ,hence it may be readily seen that this doctrine is not to be charged with prohibiting good works1 but rather the more to be commended1 because it shows how we are enabled to do good works4 ,for without faith human nature can in no wise do the works of the ,first or of the ,second ,commandment4 ,without faith it does not call upon ,god1 nor expect anything from ,god1 nor bear the cross1 but seeks1 and trusts in1 man's help4 ,and thus1 when there is no faith and trust in ,god all manner of lusts and human devices rule in the heart4 ,wherefore ,christ said1 ,john #af1f3 ,without ,me ye can do nothing2 and the ,church sings3 ,lacking ,thy divine favor1 ,there is nothing found in man1 ,naught in him is harmless4 ,article ,,xxi3 ,of the ,worship of the ,saints4 ,of the ,worship of ,saints they teach that the memory of saints may be set before us1 that we may follow their faith and good works1 according to our calling1 as the ,emperor may follow the example of ,david in making war to drive away the ,turk from his country2 ,for both are kings4 ,but the ,scripture teaches not the invocation of saints or to ask help of saints1 since it sets before us the one ,christ as the ,mediator1 ,propitiation1 ,high ,priest1 and ,intercessor4 ,he is to be prayed to1 and has promised that ,he will hear our prayer2 and this worship ,he approves above all1 to wit1 that in all afflictions ,he be called upon1 #a ,john #b1 #a3 ,if any man sin1 we have an ,advocate with the ,father1 etc4 ,this is about the ,sum of our ,doctrine1 in which1 as can be seen1 there is nothing that varies from the ,scriptures1 or from the ,church ,catholic1 or from the ,church of ,rome as known from its writers4 ,this being the case1 they judge harshly who insist that our teachers be regarded as heretics4 ,there is1 however1 disagreement on certain ,abuses1 which have crept into the ,church without rightful authority4 ,and even in these1 if there were some difference1 there should be proper lenity on the part of bishops to bear with us by reason of the ,confession which we have now reviewed2 because even the ,canons are not so severe as to demand the same rites everywhere1 neither1 at any time1 have the rites of all churches been the same2 although1 among us1 in large part1 the ancient rites are diligently observed4 ,for it is a false and malicious charge that all the ceremonies1 all the things instituted of old1 are abolished in our churches4 ,but it has been a common complaint that some abuses were connected with the ordinary rites4 ,these1 inasmuch as they could not be approved with a good conscience1 have been to some extent corrected4 ,,articles ,,in ,,which ,,are ,,reviewed ,,the ,,abuses ,,which ,,have ,,been ,,corrected4 ,inasmuch1 then1 as our churches dissent in no article of the faith from the ,church ,catholic1 but only omit some abuses which are new1 and which have been erroneously accepted by the corruption of the times1 contrary to the intent of the ,canons1 we pray that ,your ,imperial ,majesty would graciously hear both what has been changed1 and what were the reasons why the people were not compelled to observe those abuses against their conscience4 ,nor should ,your ,imperial ,majesty believe those who1 in order to excite the hatred of men against our part1 disseminate strange slanders among the people4 ,having thus excited the minds of good men1 they have first given occasion to this controversy1 and now endeavor1 by the same arts1 to increase the discord4 ,for ,your ,imperial ,majesty will undoubtedly find that the form of doctrine and of ceremonies with us is not so intolerable as these ungodly and malicious men represent4 ,besides1 the truth cannot be gathered from common rumors or the revilings of enemies4 ,but it can readily be judged that nothing would serve better to maintain the dignity of ceremonies1 and to nourish reverence and pious devotion among the people than if the ceremonies were observed rightly in the churches4 ,article ,,xxii3 ,of ,both ,kinds in the ,sacrament4 ,to the laity are given ,both ,kinds in the ,sacrament of the ,lord's ,supper1 because this usage has the commandment of the ,lord in ,matt4 #bf1 #bg3 ,drink ye all of it1 where ,christ has manifestly commanded concerning the cup that all should drink4 ,and lest any man should craftily say that this refers only to priests1 ,paul in #a ,cor4 #aa1bg recites an example from which it appears that the whole congregation did use both kinds4 ,and this usage has long remained in the ,church1 nor is it known when1 or by whose authority1 it was changed2 although ,cardinal ,cusanus mentions the time when it was approved4 ,cyprian in some places testifies that the blood was given to the people4 ,the same is testified by ,jerome1 who says3 ,the priests administer the ,eucharist1 and distribute the blood of ,christ to the people4 ,indeed1 ,pope ,gelasius commands that the ,sacrament be not divided 7dist4 ,,ii41 ,de ,consecratione1 cap4 ,comperimus74 ,only custom1 not so ancient1 has it otherwise4 ,but it is evident that any custom introduced against the commandments of ,god is not to be allowed1 as the ,canons witness 7dist4 ,,iii41 cap4 ,veritate1 and the following chapters74 ,but this custom has been received1 not only against the ,scripture1 but also against the old ,canons and the example of the ,church4 ,therefore1 if any preferred to use both kinds of the ,sacrament1 they ought not to have been compelled with offense to their consciences to do otherwise4 ,and because the division of the ,sacrament does not agree with the ordinance of ,christ1 we are accustomed to omit the procession1 which hitherto has been in use4 ,article ,,xxiii3 ,of the ,marriage of ,priests4 ,there has been common complaint concerning the examples of priests who were not chaste4 ,for that reason also ,pope ,pius is reported to have said that there were certain causes why marriage was taken away from priests1 but that there were far weightier ones why it ought to be given back2 for so ,platina writes4 ,since1 therefore1 our priests were desirous to avoid these open scandals1 they married wives1 and taught that it was lawful for them to contract matrimony4 ,first1 because ,paul says1 #a ,cor4 #g1 #b4 #i3 ,to avoid fornication1 let every man have his own wife4 ,also3 ,it is better to marry than to burn4 ,secondly ,christ says1 ,matt4 #ai1aa3 ,all men cannot receive this saying1 where ,he teaches that not all men are fit to lead a single life2 for ,god created man for procreation1 ,gen4 #a1 #bh4 ,nor is it in man's power1 without a singular gift and work of ,god1 to alter this creation4 ,for it is manifest1 and many have confessed that no good1 honest1 chaste life1 no ,christian1 sincere1 upright conduct has resulted 7from the attempt71 but a horrible1 fearful unrest and torment of conscience has been felt by many until the end4 ,therefore1 those who are not fit to lead a single life ought to contract matrimony4 ,for no man's law1 no vow1 can annul the commandment and ordinance of ,god4 ,for these reasons the priests teach that it is lawful for them to marry wives4 ,it is also evident that in the ancient ,church priests were married men4 ,for ,paul says1 #a ,tim4 #c1 #b1 that a bishop should be chosen who is the husband of one wife4 ,and in ,germany1 four hundred years ago for the first time1 the priests were violently compelled to lead a single life1 who indeed offered such resistance that the ,archbishop of ,mayence1 when about to publish the ,pope's decree concerning this matter1 was almost killed in the tumult raised by the enraged priests4 ,and so harsh was the dealing in the matter that not only were marriages forbidden for the future1 but also existing marriages were torn asunder1 contrary to all laws1 divine and human1 contrary even to the ,canons themselves1 made not only by the ,popes1 but by most celebrated ,synods4 ,moreover1 many ,god-fearing and intelligent people in high station are known frequently to have expressed misgivings that such enforced celibacy and depriving men of marriage 7which ,god ,himself has instituted and left free to men7 has never produced any good results1 but has brought on many great and evil vices and much iniquity4 ,seeing also that1 as the world is aging1 man's nature is gradually growing weaker1 it is well to guard that no more vices steal into ,germany4 ,furthermore1 ,god ordained marriage to be a help against human infirmity4 ,the ,canons themselves say that the old rigor ought now and then1 in the latter times1 to be relaxed because of the weakness of men2 which it is to be wished were done also in this matter4 ,and it is to be expected that the churches shall at some time lack pastors if marriage is any longer forbidden4 ,but while the commandment of ,god is in force1 while the custom of the ,church is well known1 while impure celibacy causes many scandals1 adulteries1 and other crimes deserving the punishments of just magistrates1 yet it is a marvelous thing that in nothing is more cruelty exercised than against the marriage of priests4 ,god has given commandment to honor marriage4 ,by the laws of all well-ordered commonwealths1 even among the heathen1 marriage is most highly honored4 ,but now men1 and that1 priests1 are cruelly put to death1 contrary to the intent of the ,canons1 for no other cause than marriage4 ,paul1 in #a ,tim4 #d1c1 calls that a doctrine of devils which forbids marriage4 ,this may now be readily understood when the law against marriage is maintained by such penalties4 ,but as no law of man can annul the commandment of ,god1 so neither can it be done by any vow4 ,accordingly1 ,cyprian also advises that women who do not keep the chastity they have promised should marry4 ,his words are these 7,book ,i1 ,epistle ,,xi 73 ,but if they be unwilling or unable to persevere1 it is better for them to marry than to fall into the fire by their lusts2 they should certainly give no offense to their brethren and sisters4 ,and even the ,canons show some leniency toward those who have taken vows before the proper age1 as heretofore has generally been the ease4 ,article ,,xxiv3 ,of the ,mass4 ,falsely are our churches accused of abolishing the ,mass2 for the ,mass is retained among us1 and celebrated with the highest reverence4 ,nearly all the usual ceremonies are also preserved1 save that the parts sung in ,latin are interspersed here and there with ,german hymns1 which have been added to teach the people4 ,for ceremonies are needed to this end alone that the unlearned be taught what they need to know of ,christ4 ,and not only has ,paul commanded to use in the church a language understood by the people #a ,cor4 #ad1b4 #i1 but it has also been so ordained by man's law4 ,the people are accustomed to partake of the ,sacrament together1 if any be fit for it1 and this also increases the reverence and devotion of public worship4 ,for none are admitted except they be first examined4 ,the people are also advised concerning the dignity and use of the ,sacrament1 how great consolation it brings anxious consciences1 that they may learn to believe ,god1 and to expect and ask of ,him all that is good4 ,in this connection they are also instructed regarding other and false teachings on the ,sacrament4 ,this worship pleases ,god2 such use of the ,sacrament nourishes true devotion toward ,god4 ,it does not1 therefore1 appear that the ,mass is more devoutly celebrated among our adversaries than among us4 ,but it is evident that for a long time this also has been the public and most grievous complaint of all good men that ,masses have been basely profaned and applied to purposes of lucre4 ,for it is not unknown how far this abuse obtains in all the churches by what manner of men ,masses are said only for fees or stipends1 and how many celebrate them contrary to the ,canons4 ,but ,paul severely threatens those who deal unworthily with the ,eucharist when he says1 #a ,cor4#aa1bg3 ,whosoever shall eat this bread1 and drink this cup of the ,lord1 unworthily1 shall be guilty of the body and blood of the ,lord4 ,when1 therefore our priests were admonished concerning this sin1 ,private ,masses were discontinued among us1 as scarcely any ,private ,masses were celebrated except for lucre's sake4 ,neither were the bishops ignorant of these abuses1 and if they had corrected them in time1 there would now be less dissension4 ,heretofore1 by their own connivance1 they suffered many corruptions to creep into the ,church4 ,now1 when it is too late1 they begin to complain of the troubles of the ,church1 while this disturbance has been occasioned simply by those abuses which were so manifest that they could be borne no longer4 ,there have been great dissensions concerning the ,mass1 concerning the ,sacrament4 ,perhaps the world is being punished for such long-continued profanations of the ,mass as have been tolerated in the churches for so many centuries by the very men who were both able and in duty bound to correct them4 ,for in the ,ten ,commandments it is written1 ,ex4 #bj1 #g3 ,the ,lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh ,his name in vain4 ,but since the world began1 nothing that ,god ever ordained seems to have been so abused for filthy lucre as the ,mass4 ,there was also added the opinion which infinitely increased ,private ,masses1 namely that ,christ1 by ,his passion1 had made satisfaction for original sin1 and instituted the ,mass wherein an offering should be made for daily sins1 venial and mortal4 ,from this has arisen the common opinion that the ,mass takes away the sins of the living and the dead by the outward act4 ,then they began to dispute whether one ,mass said for many were worth as much as special ,masses for individuals1 and this brought forth that infinite multitude of ,masses4 ,with this work men wished to obtain from ,god all that they needed1 and in the mean time faith in ,christ and the true worship were forgotten4 ,concerning these opinions our teachers have given warning that they depart from the ,holy ,scriptures and diminish the glory of the passion of ,christ4 ,for ,christ's passion was an oblation and satisfaction1 not for original guilt only1 but also for all other sins1 as it is written to the ,hebrews1 #aj1 #aj3 ,we are sanctified through the offering of ,jesus ,christ once for all4 ,also1 #aj1 #ad3 ,by one offering ,he hath perfected forever them that are sanctified4 ,it is an unheard-of innovation in the ,church to teach that ,christ by ,his death made satisfaction only for original sin and not likewise for all other sin4 ,accordingly it is hoped that everybody will understand that this error has not been reproved without due reason4 ,scripture also teaches that we are justified before ,god through faith in ,christ1 when we believe that our sins are forgiven for ,christ's sake4 ,now if the ,mass take away the sins of the living and the dead by the outward act justification comes of the work of ,masses1 and not of faith1 which ,scripture does not allow4 ,but ,christ commands us1 ,luke #bb1 #ai3 ,this do in remembrance of ,me2 therefore the ,mass was instituted that the faith of those who use the ,sacrament should remember what benefits it receives through ,christ1 and cheer and comfort the anxious conscience4 ,for to remember ,christ is to remember ,his benefits1 and to realize that they are truly offered unto us4 ,nor is it enough only to remember the history2 for this also the ,jews and the ungodly can remember4 ,wherefore the ,mass is to be used to this end1 that there the ,sacrament ,communion may be administered to them that have need of consolation2 as ,ambrose says3 ,because ,i always sin1 ,i am always bound to take the medicine4 ,therefore this ,sacrament requires faith1 and is used in vain without faith4 ,now1 forasmuch as the ,mass is such a giving of the ,sacrament1 we hold one communion every holy-day1 and1 if any desire the ,sacrament1 also on other days1 when it is given to such as ask for it4 ,and this custom is not new in the ,church2 for the ,fathers before ,gregory make no mention of any private ,mass1 but of the common ,mass the ,communion they speak very much4 ,chrysostom says that the priest stands daily at the altar1 inviting some to the ,communion and keeping back others4 ,and it appears from the ancient ,canons that some one celebrated the ,mass from whom all the other presbyters and deacons received the body of the ,lord2 for thus the words of the ,nicene ,canon say3 ,let the deacons1 according to their order1 receive the ,holy ,communion after the presbyters1 from the bishop or from a presbyter4 ,and ,paul1 #a ,cor4 #aa1 #cc1 commands concerning the ,communion3 ,tarry one for another1 so that there may be a common participation4 ,forasmuch1 therefore1 as the ,mass with us has the example of the ,church1 taken from the ,scripture and the ,fathers1 we are confident that it cannot be disapproved1 especially since public ceremonies1 for the most part like those hitherto in use1 are retained2 only the number of ,masses differs1 which1 because of very great and manifest abuses doubtless might be profitably reduced4 ,for in olden times1 even in churches most frequented1 the ,mass was not celebrated every day1 as the ,tripartite ,history 7,book #i1 chap4 #cc7 testifies3 ,again in ,alexandria1 every ,wednesday and ,friday the ,scriptures are read1 and the doctors expound them1 and all things are done1 except the solemn rite of ,communion4 ,article ,,xxv3 ,of ,confession4 ,confession in the churches is not abolished among us2 for it is not usual to give the body of the ,lord1 except to them that have been previously examined and absolved4 ,and the people are most carefully taught concerning faith in the absolution1 about which formerly there was profound silence4 ,our people are taught that they should highly prize the absolution1 as being the voice of ,god1 and pronounced by ,god's command4 ,the power of the ,keys is set forth in its beauty and they are reminded what great consolation it brings to anxious consciences1 also1 that ,god requires faith to believe such absolution as a voice sounding from heaven1 and that such faith in ,christ truly obtains and receives the forgiveness of sins4 ,aforetime satisfactions were immoderately extolled2 of faith and the merit of ,christ and the righteousness of faith no mention was made2 wherefore1 on this point1 our churches are by no means to be blamed4 ,for this even our adversaries must needs concede to us that the doctrine concerning repentance has been most diligently treated and laid open by our teachers4 ,but of ,confession they teach that an enumeration of sins is not necessary1 and that consciences be not burdened with anxiety to enumerate all sins1 for it is impossible to recount all sins1 as the ,psalm testifies1 #ai1ac3 ,who can understand his errors8 ,also ,jeremiah1 #ag #i3 ,the heart is deceitful2 who can know it2 ,but if no sins were forgiven1 except those that are recounted1 consciences could never find peace2 for very many sins they neither see nor can remember4 ,the ancient writers also testify that an enumeration is not necessary4 ,for in the ,decrees1 ,chrysostom is quoted1 who says thus3 ,i say not to you that you should disclose yourself in public1 nor that you accuse yourself before others1 but ,i would have you obey the prophet who says3 ,disclose thy self before ,god4 ,therefore confess your sins before ,god1 the true ,judge1 with prayer4 ,tell your errors1 not with the tongue1 but with the memory of your conscience1 etc4 ,and the ,gloss 7,of ,repentance1 ,distinct4 ,v1 ,cap4 ,consideret7 admits that ,confession is of human right only not commanded by ,scripture1 but ordained by the ,church4 ,nevertheless1 on account of the great benefit of absolution1 and because it is otherwise useful to the conscience1 ,confession is retained among us4 ,article ,,xxvi3 ,of the ,distinction of ,meats4 ,it has been the general persuasion1 not of the people alone1 but also of those teaching in the churches1 that making ,distinctions of ,meats1 and like traditions of men1 are works profitable to merit grace1 and able to make satisfactions for sins4 ,and that the world so thought1 appears from this1 that new ceremonies1 new orders1 new holy-days1 and new fastings were daily instituted1 and the teachers in the churches did exact these works as a service necessary to merit grace1 and did greatly terrify men's consciences1 if they should omit any of these things4 ,from this persuasion concerning traditions much detriment has resulted in the ,church4 ,first1 the doctrine of grace and of the righteousness of faith has been obscured by it1 which is the chief part of the ,gospel1 and ought to stand out as the most prominent in the ,church1 in order that the merit of ,christ may be well known1 and faith1 which believes that sins are forgiven for ,christ's sake be exalted far above works4 ,wherefore ,paul also lays the greatest stress on this article1 putting aside the ,law and human traditions1 in order to show that ,christian righteousness is something else than such works1 to wit1 the faith which believes that sins are freely forgiven for ,christ's sake4 ,but this doctrine of ,paul has been almost wholly smothered by traditions1 which have produced an opinion that1 by making distinctions in meats and like services1 we must merit grace and righteousness4 ,in treating of repentance1 there was no mention made of faith2 only those works of satisfaction were set forth2 in these the entire repentance seemed to consist4 ,secondly1 these traditions have obscured the commandments of ,god1 because traditions were placed far above the commandments of ,god4 ,christianity was thought to consist wholly in the observance of certain holy-days1 rites1 fasts1 and vestures4 ,these observances had won for themselves the exalted title of being the spiritual life and the perfect life4 ,meanwhile the commandments of ,god1 according to each one's calling1 were without honor namely1 that the father brought up his offspring1 that the mother bore children1 that the prince governed the commonwealth1--these were accounted works that were worldly and imperfect1 and far below those glittering observances4 ,and this error greatly tormented devout consciences1 which grieved that they were held in an imperfect state of life1 as in marriage1 in the office of magistrate2 or in other civil ministrations2 on the other hand1 they admired the monks and such like1 and falsely imagined that the observances of such men were more acceptable to ,god4 ,thirdly1 traditions brought great danger to consciences2 for it was impossible to keep all traditions1 and yet men judged these observances to be necessary acts of worship4 ,gerson writes that many fell into despair1 and that some even took their own lives1 because they felt that they were not able to satisfy the traditions1 and they had all the while not heard any consolation of the righteousness of faith and grace4 ,we see that the summists and theologians gather the traditions1 and seek mitigations whereby to ease consciences1 and yet they do not sufficiently unfetter1 but sometimes entangle1 consciences even more4 ,and with the gathering of these traditions1 the schools and sermons have been so much occupied that they have had no leisure to touch upon ,scripture1 and to seek the more profitable doctrine of faith1 of the cross1 of hope1 of the dignity of civil affairs of consolation of sorely tried consciences4 ,hence ,gerson and some other theologians have grievously complained that by these strivings concerning traditions they were prevented from giving attention to a better kind of doctrine4 ,augustine also forbids that men's consciences should be burdened with such observances1 and prudently advises ,januarius that he must know that they are to be observed as things indifferent2 for such are his words4 ,wherefore our teachers must not be looked upon as having taken up this matter rashly or from hatred of the bishops1 as some falsely suspect4 ,there was great need to warn the churches of these errors1 which had arisen from misunderstanding the traditions4 ,for the ,gospel compels us to insist in the churches upon the doctrine of grace1 and of the righteousness of faith2 which1 however1 cannot be understood1 if men think that they merit grace by observances of their own choice4 ,thus1 therefore1 they have taught that by the observance of human traditions we cannot merit grace or be justified1 and hence we must not think such observances necessary acts of worship4 ,they add hereunto testimonies of ,scripture4 ,christ1 ,matt4 #ae1 #c1 defends the ,apostles who had not observed the usual tradition1 which1 however1 evidently pertains to a matter not unlawful1 but indifferent1 and to have a certain affinity with the purifications of the ,law1 and says1 #i3 ,in vain do they worship ,me with the commandments of men4 ,he1 therefore1 does not exact an unprofitable service4 ,shortly after ,he adds3 ,not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man4 ,so also ,paul1 ,rom4 #ad1 #ag3 ,the kingdom of ,god is not meat and drink4 ,col4 #b1 #af3 ,let no man1 therefore1 judge you in meat1 or in drink1 or in respect of an holy-day1 or of the ,sabbath-day2 also3 ,if ye be dead with ,christ from the rudiments of the world1 why1 as though living in the world1 are ye subject to ordinances3 ,touch not1 taste not1 handle not6 ,and ,peter says1 ,acts #ae1 #aj3 ,why tempt ye ,god to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples1 which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear8 ,but we believe that through the grace of the ,lord ,jesus ,christ we shall be saved1 even as they4 ,here ,peter forbids to burden the consciences with many rites1 either of ,moses or of others4 ,and in #a ,tim4 #d1a4c ,paul calls the prohibition of meats a doctrine of devils2 for it is against the ,gospel to institute or to do such works that by them we may merit grace1 or as though ,christianity could not exist without such service of ,god4 ,here our adversaries object that our teachers are opposed to discipline and mortification of the flesh1 as ,jovinian4 ,but the contrary may be learned from the writings of our teachers4 ,for they have always taught concerning the cross that it behooves ,christians to bear afflictions4 ,this is the true1 earnest1 and unfeigned mortification1 to wit1 to be exercised with divers afflictions1 and to be crucified with ,christ4 ,moreover1 they teach that every ,christian ought to train and subdue himself with bodily restraints1 or bodily exercises and labors that neither satiety nor slothfulness tempt him to sin1 but not that we may merit grace or make satisfaction for sins by such exercises4 ,and such external discipline ought to be urged at all times1 not only on a few and set days4 ,so ,christ commands1 ,luke #ba1 #cd3 ,take heed lest your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting2 also ,matt4 #ag1 #ba3 ,this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting4 ,paul also says1 #a ,cor4 #i1 #bg3 ,i keep under my body and bring it into subjection4 ,here he clearly shows that he was keeping under his body1 not to merit forgiveness of sins by that discipline1 but to have his body in subjection and fitted for spiritual things1 and for the discharge of duty according to his calling4 ,therefore1 we do not condemn fasting in itself1 but the traditions which prescribe certain days and certain meats1 with peril of conscience1 as though such works were a necessary service4 ,nevertheless1 very many traditions are kept on our part1 which conduce to good order in the ,church1 as the ,order of ,lessons in the ,mass and the chief holy-days4 ,but1 at the same time1 men are warned that such observances do not justify before ,god1 and that in such things it should not be made sin if they be omitted without offense4 ,such liberty in human rites was not unknown to the ,fathers4 ,for in the ,east they kept ,easter at another time than at ,rome1 and when1 on account of this diversity1 the ,romans accused the ,eastern ,church of schism1 they were admonished by others that such usages need not be alike everywhere4 ,and ,irenaeus says3 ,diversity concerning fasting does not destroy the harmony of faith2 as also ,pope ,gregory intimates in ,dist4 ,,xii1 that such diversity does not violate the unity of the ,church4 ,and in the ,tripartite ,history1 ,book #i1 many examples of dissimilar rites are gathered1 and the following statement is made3 ,it was not the mind of the ,apostles to enact rules concerning holy-days1 but to preach godliness and a holy life 1 to teach faith and love4 ,article ,,xxvii3 ,of ,monastic ,vows4 ,what is taught on our part concerning ,monastic ,vows1 will be better understood if it be remembered what has been the state of the monasteries1 and how many things were daily done in those very monasteries1 contrary to the ,canons4 ,in ,augustine's time they were free associations4 ,afterward1 when discipline was corrupted1 vows were everywhere added for the purpose of restoring discipline1 as in a carefully planned prison4 ,gradually1 many other observances were added besides vows4 ,and these fetters were laid upon many before the lawful age1 contrary to the ,canons4 ,many also entered into this kind of life through ignorance1 being unable to judge their own strength1 though they were of sufficient age4 ,being thus ensnared1 they were compelled to remain1 even though some could have been freed by the kind provision of the ,canons4 ,and this was more the case in convents of women than of monks1 although more consideration should have been shown the weaker sex4 ,this rigor displeased many good men before this time1 who saw that young men and maidens were thrown into convents for a living4 ,they saw what unfortunate results came of this procedure1 and what scandals were created1 what snares were cast upon consciences6 ,they were grieved that the authority of the ,canons in so momentous a matter was utterly set aside and despised4 ,to these evils was added such a persuasion concerning vows as1 it is well known1 in former times displeased even those monks who were more considerate4 ,they taught that vows were equal to ,baptism2 they taught that by this kind of life they merited forgiveness of sins and justification before ,god4 ,yea1 they added that the monastic life not only merited righteousness before ,god but even greater things1 because it kept not only the precepts1 but also the so-called evangelical counsels4 ,thus they made men believe that the profession of monasticism was far better than ,baptism1 and that the monastic life was more meritorious than that of magistrates1 than the life of pastors1 and such like1 who serve their calling in accordance with ,god's commands1 without any man-made services4 ,none of these things can be denied2 for they appear in their own books4 ,moreover1 a person who has been thus ensnared and has entered a monastery learns little of ,christ4 ,what1 then1 came to pass in the monasteries8 ,aforetime they were schools of theology and other branches1 profitable to the ,church2 and thence pastors and bishops were obtained4 ,now it is another thing4 ,it is needless to rehearse what is known to all4 ,aforetime they came together to learn2 now they feign that it is a kind of life instituted to merit grace and righteousness2 yea1 they preach that it is a state of perfection1 and they put it far above all other kinds of life ordained of ,god4 ,these things we have rehearsed without odious exaggeration1 to the end that the doctrine of our teachers on this point might be better understood4 ,first1 concerning such as contract matrimony1 they teach on our part that it is lawful for all men who are not fitted for single life to contract matrimony1 because vows cannot annul the ordinance and commandment of ,god4 ,but the commandment of ,god is #a ,cor4 #g1 #b3 ,to avoid fornication1 let every man have his own wife4 ,nor is it the commandment only1 but also the creation and ordinance of ,god1 which forces those to marry who are not excepted by a singular work of ,god1 according to the text ,gen4 #b1 #ah3 ,it is not good that the man should be alone4 ,therefore they do not sin who obey this commandment and ordinance of ,god4 ,what objection can be raised to this8 ,let men extol the obligation of a vow as much as they list1 yet shall they not bring to pass that the vow annuls the commandment of ,god4 ,the ,canons teach that the right of the superior is excepted in every vow2 that vows are not binding against the decision of the ,pope2 much less1 therefore1 are these vows of force which are against the commandments of ,god4 ,now1 if the obligation of vows could not be changed for any cause whatever1 the ,roman ,pontiffs could never have given dispensation for it is not lawful for man to annul an obligation which is simply divine4 ,but the ,roman ,pontiffs have prudently judged that leniency is to be observed in this obligation1 and therefore we read that many times they have dispensed from vows4 ,the case of the ,king of ,aragon who was called back from the monastery is well known1 and there are also examples in our own times4 ,now1 if dispensations have been granted for the sake of securing temporal interests1 it is much more proper that they be granted on account of the distress of souls4 ,in the second place1 why do our adversaries exaggerate the obligation or effect of a vow when1 at the same time1 they have not a word to say of the nature of the vow itself1 that it ought to be in a thing possible1 that it ought to be free1 and chosen spontaneously and deliberately8 ,but it is not unknown to what extent perpetual chastity is in the power of man4 ,and how few are there who have taken the vow spontaneously and deliberately6 ,young maidens and men1 before they are able to judge1 are persuaded1 and sometimes even compelled1 to take the vow4 ,wherefore it is not fair to insist so rigorously on the obligation1 since it is granted by all that it is against the nature of a vow to take it without spontaneous and deliberate action4 ,most canonical laws rescind vows made before the age of fifteen2 for before that age there does not seem sufficient judgment in a person to decide concerning a perpetual life4 ,another ,canon1 granting more to the weakness of man1 adds a few years2 for it forbids a vow to be made before the age of eighteen4 ,but which of these two ,canons shall we follow8 ,the most part have an excuse for leaving the monasteries1 because most of them have taken the vows before they reached these ages4 ,finally1 even though the violation of a vow might be censured1 yet it seems not forthwith to follow that the marriages of such persons must be dissolved4 ,for ,augustine denies that they ought to be dissolved 7,,xxvii4 ,quaest4 ,i1 ,cap4 ,nuptiarum71 and his authority is not lightly to be esteemed1 although other men afterwards thought otherwise4 ,but although it appears that ,god's command concerning marriage delivers very many from their vows1 yet our teachers introduce also another argument concerning vows to show that they are void4 ,for every service of ,god1 ordained and chosen of men without the commandment of ,god to merit justification and grace1 is wicked1 as ,christ says ,matt4 #af1 #i3 ,in vain do they worship ,me with the commandments of men4 ,and ,paul teaches everywhere that righteousness is not to be sought from our own observances and acts of worship1 devised by men1 but that it comes by faith to those who believe that they are received by ,god into grace for ,christ's sake4 ,but it is evident that monks have taught that services of man's making satisfy for sins and merit grace and justification4 ,what else is this than to detract from the glory of ,christ and to obscure and deny the righteousness of faith8 ,it follows1 therefore1 that the vows thus commonly taken have been wicked services1 and1 consequently1 are void4 ,for a wicked vow1 taken against the commandment of ,god1 is not valid2 for 7as the ,canon says7 no vow ought to bind men to wickedness4 ,paul says1 ,gal4 #e1 #d3 ,christ is become of no effect unto you1 whosoever of you are justified by the ,law1 ye are fallen from grace4 ,to those1 therefore1 who want to be justified by their vows ,christ is made of no effect1 and they fall from grace4 ,for also these who ascribe justification to vows ascribe to their own works that which properly belongs to the glory of ,christ4 ,nor can it be denied1 indeed1 that the monks have taught that1 by their vows and observances1 they were justified1 and merited forgiveness of sins1 yea1 they invented still greater absurdities1 saying that they could give others a share in their works4 ,if any one should be inclined to enlarge on these things with evil intent1 how many things could he bring together whereof even the monks are now ashamed6 ,over and above this1 they persuaded men that services of man's making were a state of ,christian perfection4 ,and is not this assigning justification to works8 ,it is no light offense in the ,church to set forth to the people a service devised by men1 without the commandment of ,god1 and to teach that such service justifies men4 ,for the righteousness of faith1 which chiefly ought to be taught in the ,church1 is obscured when these wonderful angelic forms of worship1 with their show of poverty1 humility1 and celibacy1 are east before the eyes of men4 ,furthermore1 the precepts of ,god and the true service of ,god are obscured when men hear that only monks are in a state of perfection4 ,for ,christian perfection is to fear ,god from the heart1 and yet to conceive great faith1 and to trust that for ,christ's sake we have a ,god who has been reconciled1 to ask of ,god1 and assuredly to expect ,his aid in all things that1 according to our calling1 are to be done2 and meanwhile1 to be diligent in outward good works1 and to serve our calling4 ,in these things consist the true perfection and the true service of ,god4 ,it does not consist in celibacy1 or in begging1 or in vile apparel4 ,but the people conceive many pernicious opinions from the false commendations of monastic life4 ,they hear celibacy praised above measure2 therefore they lead their married life with offense to their consciences4 ,they hear that only beggars are perfect2 therefore they keep their possessions and do business with offense to their consciences4 ,they hear that it is an evangelical counsel not to seek revenge2 therefore some in private life are not afraid to take revenge1 for they hear that it is but a counsel1 and not a commandment4 ,others judge that the ,christian cannot properly hold a civil office or be a magistrate4 ,there are on record examples of men who1 forsaking marriage and the administration of the ,commonwealth1 have hid themselves in monasteries4 ,this they called fleeing from the world1 and seeking a kind of life which would be more pleasing to ,god4 ,neither did they see that ,god ought to be served in those commandments which ,he ,himself has given and not in commandments devised by men4 ,a good and perfect kind of life is that which has for it the commandment of ,god4 ,it is necessary to admonish men of these things4 ,and before these times1 ,gerson rebukes this error of the monks concerning perfection1 and testifies that in his day it was a new saying that the monastic life is a state of perfection4 ,so many wicked opinions are inherent in the vows1 namely1 that they justify1 that they constitute ,christian perfection1 that they keep the counsels and commandments1 that they have works of supererogation4 ,all these things1 since they are false and empty1 make vows null and void4 ,article ,,xxviii3 ,of ,ecclesiastical ,power4 ,there has been great controversy concerning the ,power of ,bishops1 in which some have awkwardly confounded the power of the ,church and the power of the sword4 ,and from this confusion very great wars and tumults have resulted1 while the ,pontiffs1 emboldened by the power of the ,keys1 not only have instituted new services and burdened consciences with reservation of cases and ruthless excommunications1 but have also undertaken to transfer the kingdoms of this world1 and to take the ,empire from the ,emperor4 ,these wrongs have long since been rebuked in the ,church by learned and godly men4 ,therefore our teachers1 for the comforting of men's consciences1 were constrained to show the difference between the power of the ,church and the power of the sword1 and taught that both of them1 because of ,god's commandment1 are to be held in reverence and honor1 as the chief blessings of ,god on earth4 ,but this is their opinion1 that the power of the ,keys1 or the power of the bishops1 according to the ,gospel1 is a power or commandment of ,god1 to preach the ,gospel1 to remit and retain sins1 and to administer ,sacraments4 ,for with this commandment ,christ sends forth ,his ,apostles1 ,john #bj1 #ba sqq43 ,as ,my ,father hath sent ,me1 even so send ,i you4 ,receive ye the ,holy ,ghost4 ,whosesoever sins ye remit1 they are remitted unto them2 and whosesoever sins ye retain1 they are retained4 ,mark #af1 #ae3 ,go preach the ,gospel to every creature4 ,this power is exercised only by teaching or preaching the ,gospel and administering the ,sacraments1 according to their calling either to many or to individuals4 ,for thereby are granted1 not bodily1 but eternal things1 as eternal righteousness1 the ,holy ,ghost1 eternal life4 ,these things cannot come but by the ministry of the ,word and the ,sacraments1 as ,paul says1 ,rom4 #a1 #af3 ,the ,gospel is the power of ,god unto salvation to every one that believeth4 ,therefore1 since the power of the ,church grants eternal things1 and is exercised only by the ministry of the ,word1 it does not interfere with civil government2 no more than the art of singing interferes with civil government4 ,for civil government deals with other things than does the ,gospel4 ,the civil rulers defend not minds1 but bodies and bodily things against manifest injuries1 and restrain men with the sword and bodily punishments in order to preserve civil justice and peace4 ,therefore the power of the ,church and the civil power must not be confounded4 ,the power of the ,church has its own commission to teach the ,gospel and to administer the ,sacraments4 ,let it not break into the office of another2 ,let it not transfer the kingdoms of this world2 let it not abrogate the laws of civil rulers2 let it not abolish lawful obedience2 let it not interfere with judgments concerning civil ordinances or contracts2 let it not prescribe laws to civil rulers concerning the form of the ,commonwealth4 ,as ,christ says1 ,john #ah1 #cc3 ,my kingdom is not of this world2 also ,luke #ab1 #ad3 ,who made ,me a judge or a divider over you8 ,paul also says1 ,phil4 #c1 #bj3 ,our citizenship is in heaven2 #b ,cor4 #aj1 #d3 ,the weapons of our warfare are not carnal1 but mighty through ,god to the casting down of imaginations4 ,after this manner our teachers discriminate between the duties of both these powers1 and command that both be honored and acknowledged as gifts and blessings of ,god4 ,if bishops have any power of the sword1 that power they have1 not as bishops1 by the commission of the ,gospel1 but by human law having received it of kings and emperors for the civil administration of what is theirs4 ,this1 however1 is another office than the ministry of the ,gospel4 ,when1 therefore1 the question is concerning the jurisdiction of bishops1 civil authority must be distinguished from ecclesiastical jurisdiction4 ,again1 according to the ,gospel or1 as they say1 by divine right1 there belongs to the bishops as bishops1 that is1 to those to whom has been committed the ministry of the ,word and the ,sacraments1 no jurisdiction except to forgive sins1 to judge doctrine1 to reject doctrines contrary to the ,gospel1 and to exclude from the communion of the ,church wicked men1 whose wickedness is known1 and this without human force1 simply by the ,word4 ,herein the congregations of necessity and by divine right must obey them1 according to ,luke #aj1 #af3 ,he that heareth you heareth ,me4 ,but when they teach or ordain anything against the ,gospel1 then the congregations have a commandment of ,god prohibiting obedience1 ,matt4 #g1 #ae3 ,beware of false prophets2 ,gal4 #a1 #h3 ,though an angel from heaven preach any other gospel1 let him be accursed2 #b ,cor4 #ac1 #h3 ,we can do nothing against the truth1 but for the truth4 ,also3 ,the power which the ,lord hath given me to edification1 and not to destruction4 ,so1 also1 the ,canonical ,laws command 7,,ii4 ,q4 ,,vii4 ,cap41 ,sacerdotes1 and ,cap4 ,oves74 ,and ,augustine 7,contra ,petiliani ,epistolam73 ,neither must we submit to ,catholic bishops if they chance to err1 or hold anything contrary to the ,canonical ,scriptures of ,god4 ,if they have any other power or jurisdiction1 in hearing and judging certain cases1 as of matrimony or of tithes1 etc41 they have it by human right1 in which matters princes are bound1 even against their will1 when the ordinaries fail1 to dispense justice to their subjects for the maintenance of peace4 ,moreover1 it is disputed whether bishops or pastors have the right to introduce ceremonies in the ,church1 and to make laws concerning meats1 holy-days and grades1 that is1 orders of ministers1 etc4 ,they that give this right to the bishops refer to this testimony ,john #af1 #ab4 #ac3 ,i have yet many things to say unto you1 but ye cannot bear them now4 ,howbeit when ,he1 the ,spirit of ,truth1 is come1 ,he will guide you into all truth4 ,they also refer to the example of the ,apostles1 who commanded to abstain from blood and from things strangled1 ,acts #ae1 #bi4 ,they refer to the ,sabbath-day as having been changed into the ,lord's ,day1 contrary to the ,decalog1 as it seems4 ,neither is there any example whereof they make more than concerning the changing of the ,sabbath-day4 ,great1 say they1 is the power of the ,church1 since it has dispensed with one of the ,ten ,commandments6 ,but concerning this question it is taught on our part 7as has been shown above7 that bishops have no power to decree anything against the ,gospel4 ,the ,canonical ,laws teach the same thing 7,dist4 ,,ix74 ,now1 it is against ,scripture to establish or require the observance of any traditions1 to the end that by such observance we may make satisfaction for sins1 or merit grace and righteousness4 ,for the glory of ,christ's merit suffers injury when1 by such observances1 we undertake to merit justification4 ,but it is manifest that1 by such belief1 traditions have almost infinitely multiplied in the ,church1 the doctrine concerning faith and the righteousness of faith being meanwhile suppressed4 ,for gradually more holy-days were made1 fasts appointed1 new ceremonies and services in honor of saints instituted1 because the authors of such things thought that by these works they were meriting grace4 ,thus in times past the ,penitential ,canons increased1 whereof we still see some traces in the satisfactions4 ,again1 the authors of traditions do contrary to the command of ,god when they find matters of sin in foods1 in days1 and like things1 and burden the ,church with bondage of the law1 as if there ought to be among ,christians1 in order to merit justification a service like the ,levitical1 the arrangement of which ,god had committed to the ,apostles and bishops4 ,for thus some of them write2 and the ,pontiffs in some measure seem to be misled by the example of the law of ,moses4 ,hence are such burdens1 as that they make it mortal sin1 even without offense to others1 to do manual labor on holy-days1 a mortal sin to omit the ,canonical ,hours1 that certain foods defile the conscience that fastings are works which appease ,god that sin in a reserved case cannot be forgiven but by the authority of him who reserved it2 whereas the ,canons themselves speak only of the reserving of the ecclesiastical penalty1 and not of the reserving of the guilt4 ,whence have the bishops the right to lay these traditions upon the ,church for the ensnaring of consciences1 when ,peter1 ,acts #ae1 #aj1 forbids to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples1 and ,paul says1 #b ,cor4 #ac1 #aj1 that the power given him was to edification not to destruction8 ,why1 therefore1 do they increase sins by these traditions8 ,but there are clear testimonies which prohibit the making of such traditions1 as though they merited grace or were necessary to salvation4 ,paul says1 ,col4 #b1 #af-bc3 ,let no man judge you in meat1 or in drink1 or in respect of an holy-day1 or of the new moon1 or of the ,sabbath-days4 ,if ye be dead with ,christ from the rudiments of the world1 why1 as though living in the world1 are ye subject to ordinances 7touch not2 taste not2 handle not1 which all are to perish with the using7 after the commandments and doctrines of men6 which things have indeed a show of wisdom4 ,also in ,titus #a1 #ad he openly forbids traditions3 ,not giving heed to ,jewish fables and commandments of men that turn from the truth4 ,and ,christ1 ,matt4 #ae1 #ad4 #ac1 says of those who require traditions3 ,let them alone2 they be blind leaders of the blind2 and ,he rejects such services3 ,every plant which ,my heavenly ,father hath not planted shall be plucked up4 ,if bishops have the right to burden churches with infinite traditions1 and to ensnare consciences1 why does ,scripture so often prohibit to make1 and to listen to1 traditions8 ,why does it call them doctrines of devils8 #a ,tim4 #d1 #a4 ,did the ,holy ,ghost in vain forewarn of these things8 ,since1 therefore1 ordinances instituted as things necessary1 or with an opinion of meriting grace1 are contrary to the ,gospel1 it follows that it is not lawful for any bishop to institute or exact such services4 ,for it is necessary that the doctrine of ,christian liberty be preserved in the churches1 namely1 that the bondage of the ,law is not necessary to justification1 as it is written in the ,epistle to the ,galatians1 #e1 #a3 ,be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage4 ,it is necessary that the chief article of the ,gospel be preserved1 to wit1 that we obtain grace freely by faith in ,christ1 and not for certain observances or acts of worship devised by men4 ,what1 then1 are we to think of the ,sunday and like rites in the house of ,god8 ,to this we answer that it is lawful for bishops or pastors to make ordinances that things be done orderly in the ,church1 not that thereby we should merit grace or make satisfaction for sins1 or that consciences be bound to judge them necessary services1 and to think that it is a sin to break them without offense to others4 ,so ,paul ordains1 #a ,cor4 #aa1 #e1 that women should cover their heads in the congregation1 #a ,cor4 #ad1 #cj1 that interpreters be heard in order in the church1 etc4 ,it is proper that the churches should keep such ordinances for the sake of love and tranquillity1 so far that one do not offend another1 that all things be done in the churches in order1 and without confusion1 #a ,cor4 #ad1 #dj2 comp4 ,phil4 #b1 #ad2 but so that consciences be not burdened to think that they are necessary to salvation1 or to judge that they sin when they break them without offense to others2 as no one will say that a woman sins who goes out in public with her head uncovered provided only that no offense be given4 ,of this kind is the observance of the ,lord's ,day1 ,easter1 ,pentecost1 and like holy-days and rites4 ,for those who judge that by the authority of the ,church the observance of the ,lord's ,day instead of the ,sabbath-day was ordained as a thing necessary1 do greatly err4 ,scripture has abrogated the ,sabbath-day2 for it teaches that1 since the ,gospel has been revealed1 all the ceremonies of ,moses can be omitted4 ,and yet1 because it was necessary to appoint a certain day1 that the people might know when they ought to come together1 it appears that the ,church designated the ,lord's ,day for this purpose2 and this day seems to have been chosen all the more for this additional reason1 that men might have an example of ,christian liberty1 and might know that the keeping neither of the ,sabbath nor of any other day is necessary4 ,there are monstrous disputations concerning the changing of the law1 the ceremonies of the new law1 the changing of the ,sabbath-day1 which all have sprung from the false belief that there must needs be in the ,church a service like to the ,levitical1 and that ,christ had given commission to the ,apostles and bishops to devise new ceremonies as necessary to salvation4 ,these errors crept into the ,church when the righteousness of faith was not taught clearly enough4 ,some dispute that the keeping of the ,lord's ,day is not indeed of divine right1 but in a manner so4 ,they prescribe concerning holy-days1 how far it is lawful to work4 ,what else are such disputations than snares of consciences8 ,for although they endeavor to modify the traditions1 yet the mitigation can never be perceived as long as the opinion remains that they are necessary1 which must needs remain where the righteousness of faith and ,christian liberty are not known4 ,the ,apostles commanded ,acts #ae1 #bj to abstain from blood4 ,who does now observe it8 ,and yet they that do it not sin not2 for not even the ,apostles themselves wanted to burden consciences with such bondage2 but they forbade it for a time1 to avoid offense4 ,for in this decree we must perpetually consider what the aim of the ,gospel is4 ,scarcely any ,canons are kept with exactness1 and from day to day many go out of use even among those who are the most zealous advocates of traditions4 ,neither can due regard be paid to consciences unless this mitigation be observed1 that we know that the ,canons are kept without holding them to be necessary1 and that no harm is done consciences1 even though traditions go out of use4 ,but the bishops might easily retain the lawful obedience of the people if they would not insist upon the observance of such traditions as cannot be kept with a good conscience4 ,now they command celibacy2 they admit none unless they swear that they will not teach the pure doctrine of the ,gospel4 ,the churches do not ask that the bishops should restore concord at the expense of their honor2 which1 nevertheless1 it would be proper for good pastors to do4 ,they ask only that they would release unjust burdens which are new and have been received contrary to the custom of the ,church ,catholic4 ,it may be that in the beginning there were plausible reasons for some of these ordinances2 and yet they are not adapted to later times4 ,it is also evident that some were adopted through erroneous conceptions4 ,therefore it would be befitting the clemency of the ,pontiffs to mitigate them now1 because such a modification does not shake the unity of the ,church4 ,for many human traditions have been changed in process of time1 as the ,canons themselves show4 ,but if it be impossible to obtain a mitigation of such observances as cannot be kept without sin1 we are bound to follow the apostolic rule1 ,acts #e1 #bi1 which commands us to obey ,god rather than men4 ,peter1 #a ,pet4 #e1 #c1 forbids bishops to be lords1 and to rule over the churches4 ,it is not our design now to wrest the government from the bishops1 but this one thing is asked1 namely1 that they allow the ,gospel to be purely taught1 and that they relax some few observances which cannot be kept without sin4 ,but if they make no concession1 it is for them to see how they shall give account to ,god for furnishing1 by their obstinacy1 a cause for schism4 ,,conclusion4 ,these are the chief articles which seem to be in controversy4 ,for although we might have spoken of more abuses1 yet1 to avoid undue length1 we have set forth the chief points1 from which the rest may be readily judged4 ,there have been great complaints concerning indulgences1 pilgrimages1 and the abuse of excommunications4 ,the parishes have been vexed in many ways by the dealers in indulgences4 ,there were endless contentions between the pastors and the monks concerning the parochial right1 confessions1 burials1 sermons on extraordinary occasions1 and innumerable other things4 ,issues of this sort we have passed over so that the chief points in this matter1 having been briefly set forth1 might be the more readily understood4 ,nor has anything been here said or adduced to the reproach of any one4 ,only those things have been recounted whereof we thought that it was necessary to speak1 in order that it might be understood that in doctrine and ceremonies nothing has been received on our part against ,scripture or the ,church ,catholic4 ,for it is manifest that we have taken most diligent care that no new and ungodly doctrine should creep into our churches4 ,the above articles we desire to present in accordance with the edict of ,your ,imperial ,majesty1 in order to exhibit our ,confession and let men see a summary of the doctrine of our teachers4 ,if there is anything that any one might desire in this ,confession1 we are ready1 ,god willing1 to present ampler information according to the ,scriptures4 ,your ,imperial ,majesty's faithful subjects3 ,john1 ,duke of ,saxony1 ,elector4 ,george1 ,margrave of ,brandenburg4 ,ernest1 ,duke of ,lueneberg4 ,philip1 ,landgrave of ,hesse4 ,john ,frederick1 ,duke of ,saxony4 ,francis1 ,duke of ,lueneburg4 ,wolfgang1 ,prince of ,anhalt4 ,senate and ,magistracy of ,nuremburg4 ,senate of ,reutlingen4