,,an ,,expository ,,outline ,,of ,,the ,,vestiges ,,of ,,the ,,natural ,,history ,,of ,,creation2 ,,with ,a ,,comprehensive ,,and ,,critical ,,analysis ,,of ,,the ,,arguments ,,by ,,which ,,the ,,extraordinary ,,hypotheses ,,of ,,the ,,author ,,are ,,supported ,,and ,,have ,,been ,,impugned1 ,,with ,,their ,,bearing ,,upon ,,the ,,religious ,,and ,,moral ,,interests ,,of ,,the ,,community4 ,,with ,a ,,notice ,,of ,,the ,,author',s ,,explanations3 ,a ,,sequel ,,to ,,the ,,vestiges4 99 99 99 99 99 ,originally printed in a ,supplement of ,,the ,,atlas ,newspaper of ,august #cj and ,december #bj1 #ahde4 99 99 99 99 99 ,,london3 ,,effingham ,,wilson1 ,,royal ,,exchange4 ,j4 ,,vincent1 ,,oxford2 ,g4 ,,andrews1 ,,durham2 ,j4 ,,teppell1 ,,norwich2 ,,brodie ,,and ,,co41 ,,salisbury4 ,a4 ,,and ,c4 ,,black1 ,,edinburgh2 ,d4 ,,robertson1 ,,glasgow2 ,a4 ,,brown ,,and ,,co41 ,,aberdeen4 ,w4 ,,curry1 ,,jun41 ,,and ,,co41 ,,dublin4 #ahdf4 ,,advertisement4 99 99 99 99 99 ,the following tractate first appeared in the form of a literary review in a supplement of the ,,atlas2 but two impressions of that journal having been long since exhausted1 and inquiries still continuing numerous and urgent1 the proprietor has granted permission for the article to be reprinted in a separate1 more convenient1 and perhaps enduring vehicle than that of a newspaper4 ,few works of a scientific import have been published that so promptly and deeply fixed public attention as the ,vestiges of ,creation1 or elicited more numerous replies and sharper critical analysis and disquisition4 ,upon so vast a question as the evolution of universal creation differences of opinion were natural and unavoidable4 ,many have disputed the accuracy of some of the author's facts1 and the sequence and validity of his inductive inferences2 but few can withhold from him the praise of a patient and intrepid spirit of inquiry1 much occasional eloquence1 and very considerable powers of analysis1 systematic induction1 arrangement and combination4 ,in what follows the leading objects kept in view have been--first1 an expository outline of the author's facts and argument2 next1 of the chief reasons by which they have been impugned by ,professor ,,sedgwick1 ,professor ,,whewell1 ,mr4 ,,bosanquet1 and others who have entered the lists of controversy4 ,these arrayed1 the concluding purpose fitly followed of a brief exhibition of the relative strength of the main points in issue1 with their bearing on the moral and religious interests of the community4 ,it is the fourth and latest edition that has been submitted to investigation4 ,in this impression the author has introduced several corrections and alterations1 without1 however1 any infringement or mitigation of its original scope and character4 ,more recently appeared his ,explanations1 a ,sequel to the ,vestiges of the ,natural ,history of ,creation2 in which the author endeavours to elucidate and strengthen his former position4 ,this had become necessary in consequence of the number of his opponents1 and the inquiry and discussion to which the original publication had given rise4 ,of this1 also1 a lengthened review was given in the ,,atlas1 which has been included2 so that the reader will now have before him a succinct outline of a novel and interesting topic of philosophical investigation4 ,in the present reprint a few corrections have been made1 and the illustrative table at page #cd1 and some other additions1 introduced4 ,london1 ,january #a1 #ahdf4 ,,an ,,expository ,,outline ,,of ,,the ,,vestiges ,,of ,,the ,,natural ,,history ,,of ,,creation4 ,it rarely happens that speculative inquiries in ,england command much attention1 and the ,vestiges of ,creation would have probably formed no exception1 had it not been from the unusual ability with which the work has been executed4 ,the subject investigated is one of vast1 almost universal1 interest2 for everyone--the low1 in common with the high in intellect--find enigmas in creation that they would gladly have unriddled1 and promptly gather round the oracle who has boldly stepped forth to cut the knot of their perplexities4 ,the first impression made1 too1 is favourable4 ,no very striking originality1 eloquence1 or genius1 is displayed2 yet there is ingenuity2 and though the author betrays the zeal of an advocate1 desirous of leading to a determinate and material conclusion1 his address1 like that of the apostle of temperance1 is mostly mild and equable1 with occasionally a little gentlemanly fervour to give animation to his discourse4 ,his style is mostly felicitous1 sometimes beautiful1 lucid1 precise1 and elevated4 ,in tone and manner of execution1 in quiet steadiness of purpose1 in the firm1 intrepid spirit with which truth1 or that which is conceived to be true1 is followed1 regardless of startling presentments1 the ,vestiges call to mind the ,mecanique ,celeste1 or ,systme du ,monde4 ,in caution1 as in science1 the author is immeasurably inferior to ,,laplace2 but in magnitude and boldness of design he transcends the illustrious ,frenchman4 ,,laplace sought no more than to subject the celestial movements to the formulas of analysis1 and reconcile to common observation terrestrial appearances2 but our author is far more ambitious--more venturesome in aim--which is nothing less than to lift the veil of ,,isis1 and solve the phenomena of universal nature4 ,with what success remains to be considered4 ,that great skill and cleverness1 that a very superior mastery is evinced1 we have conceded1 and1 we will also add1 great show of fairness in treatment and conclusion4 ,no partial opening is made2 the great design1 in all its extent1 is manfully grappled with4 ,the universe is first surveyed1 next the mystery of its origin4 ,after ranging through sidereal space1 examining the bodies found there1 their arrangement1 formation1 and evolution1 the author selects our own planet for especial interrogation4 ,he disembowels it1 scrutinizing the internal evidences of its structure and history1 and thence infers the causes of past vicissitudes1 existing relations1 and appearances4 ,these disposed of1 the surface is explored1 the phenomena of animal and vegetable existence contemplated1 and the sources of vital action1 sexual differences1 and diversities of species assigned4 ,man1 as the supreme head and last work of progressive creation1 challenges a distinct consideration2 his history and mental constitution are investigated1 and the relation in which a sublime reason stands to the instinct of brutes discriminated4 ,the end and purpose of all appropriately form the concluding theme1 which finished1 the curtain drops1 and the last sounds heard are that the name of the ,great ,unknown will probably never be revealed2 that praise will elicit no response1 nor any word of censure be parried or deprecated4 ,give me1 exclaimed ,,archimedes1 a fulcrum1 and ,i will raise the earth4 ,give me1 says the author of the ,vestiges1 gravitation and development1 and ,i will create a universe4 ,,alexander',s ambition was to conquer a world1 our author's is to create one4 ,but he is wrong in saying that his is the first attempt to connect the natural sciences into a history of creation1 and thence to eliminate a view of nature as one grand system of causation4 ,the attempt has been often made1 but utterly failed2 its results have been found valueless1 hurtful--to have occupied without enlarging the intellect1 and the very effort has long been discountenanced4 ,great advances1 however1 have been made in science since system-making began to be discredited2 nature has been perseveringly ransacked in all her domains1 and many extraordinary secrets drawn from her laboratory4 ,astronomy and geology1 chemistry and electricity1 have greatly extended the bounds of knowledge2 still1 we apprehend1 we are not yet sufficiently armed with facts to resolve into one consistent whole her infinite variety4 ,efforts at generalization1 however1 and the systematic arrangement of natural phenomena1 are seldom wholly fruitless4 ,if false1 they tend to provoke discussion--to lead to active thought and useful research4 ,a solitary truth1 though new and useful1 rarely obtains higher distinction than to be quietly placed on the rolls of science1 while a bold speculation1 traversing the whole field of creation1 and smoothing all its difficulties1 satisfies for the moment1 and fixes general attention4 ,of this the ,vestiges of ,creation are an example4 ,without adding to our positive knowledge by a single new discovery1 demonstration1 or experiment1 they have excited more interest than the ,principia of ,,newton4 ,from this popular success1 if good do not accrue1 no great evil need be anticipated4 ,hypotheses are most hurtful when accredited by an irreversible authority--when erected into a tribunal without appeal1 they become the arbitrary dictator in lieu of the handmaid of science4 ,discussion and invention1 in place of being stimulated1 are then fettered by them2 the human mind is enslaved1 as ,europe was for centuries by the ,physics of ,,aristotle1 and still continues to be in some of the ancient retreats and conservatories of exploded errors4 ,but these form the exceptions1 not the rule of the age1 which is free and equal inquiry4 ,errors have ceased to have prescriptive immunities2 and mere conjectures1 however sanctioned or plausible1 if inconsistent with science--with the ascertained facts of experiment and observation1 are speedily passed into the region of dreams and chimeras4 ,whether this will be the fate of our author remains to be proved4 ,the moment selected for his appearance has at least been well chosen4 ,the ,vestiges have the air of novelty1 a long time having elapsed since any one had the hardihood to propound a new system of ,nature4 ,in common with most manifestations of our time1 his effort exhibits a marked improvement on the crudities of his predecessors in the same line of architectural ambition4 ,science has been called to his aid1 and the patient ingenuity with which he has sought to make the latest discoveries subservient to his purpose challenges admiration1 if not acquiescence4 ,some of our contemporaries have been warmed into almost theological aversion by the boldness of his conclusions1 but we see little cause for fear1 and none for bitterness or apprehension4 ,more closely ,nature is investigated and deeper the impression will become of her majesty and might4 ,unlike earthly greatnesses1 she loses no power--no grandeur--no fascination--no prestige1 by familiarity4 ,the greatest philosophers will always rank among her greatest admirers and most devout and fervent worshippers4 ,had our author proved all he has assumed our faith would not be lessened1 nor our wonder diminished4 ,whether matter or spirit has been the world's architect1 the astounding miracle of its creation is not the less4 ,what does it import whether it resulted direct from the fiat of ,omnipotence1 or intermediately from the properties ,he impressed1 or the law of development ,he prescribed8 ,he who gave the law1 who infused the energies by which ,chaos was transmuted into an organized universe1 remains great and inscrutable as ever4 ,it is time1 however1 that we entered upon a more detailed and closer investigation of the ,vestiges of ,creation4 ,our purpose is not hastily1 and without examination1 to deprecate1 deny1 or controvert2 but patiently1 and without prejudice1 to inquire1 to submit faithfully and intelligibly the outlines of a remarkable treatise2 describe briefly its scope and bearing1 the arguments by which they are supported1 and the counter reasons by which they appear to be wholly or partially impugned4 ,our readers will thus be enabled to appreciate the merits of a controversy1 the most comprehensive and interesting that for a lengthened period has occupied the attention of the scientific and intellectual world4 ,for greater clearness of exposition we shall endeavour to follow the order observed by the author in the division and treatment of his subjects1 commencing first with the ,,bodies ,,of ,,space4 ,the author opens his subject with a brief but luminous outline of the arrangement and formation of the astral and planetary systems of the heavens4 ,he first describes the solar system1 of which our earth is a member1 consisting of the sun1 planets1 and satellites with the less intelligible orbs termed comets1 and taking as the uttermost bounds of this system the orbit of ,uranus1 it occupies a portion of space not less than three thousand six hundred millions of miles in diameter4 ,the mind cannot form an exact notion of so vast an expanse1 but an idea of it may be obtained from the fact1 that1 if the swiftest racehorse ever known had began to traverse it at full speed at the time of the birth of ,,moses1 he would only yet have accomplished half his journey4 ,vast as is the solar system1 it is only one of an infinity of others which may be still more extensive4 ,our sun is supposed to be a star belonging to a constellation of stars1 each of which has its accompaniment of revolving planets2 and the constellation itself with similar constellations to form revolving clusters round some mightier centre of attraction2 and so on1 each astral combination increasing in number1 magnitude1 and complexity1 till the mind is utterly lost in the vain effort to grasp the limitless arrangement4 ,of the stars astronomers can hardly be said to know anything with certainty4 ,sirius1 which is the most lustrous1 was long supposed to be the nearest and most within the reach of observation1 but all attempts to calculate the distance of that luminary have proved futile4 ,of its inconceivable remoteness some notion may be formed by the fact1 that the diameter of the earth's annual orbit1 if viewed from it1 would dwindle into an invisible point4 ,this is what is meant by the stars not having1 like the planets1 a parallax2 that is1 the earths' orbit1 as seen from them1 does not subtend a measurable angle4 ,with two other stars1 however1 astronomers have unexpectedly and recently been more fortunate than with ,sirius1 and have been able to calculate their distances from the earth4 ,the celebrated ,,bessel1 and soon afterwards1 the late ,mr4 ,,henderson1 astronomer royal for ,scotland1 were the first to surmount the difficulty that had baffled the telescopic resources of the ,,herschels4 ,,bessel detected a parallax of one-third of a second in the star #fa ,cygni1 and in the constellation of the ,centaur ,,henderson found another star whose parallax amounted to one second4 ,of the million of fixed glittering points that adorn the sky1 these are the only two whose distances have been calculated1 and to express them1 miles1 leagues1 or orbits seems inadequate4 ,light1 whose speed is known to be #aib1jjj miles per second1 would be three years in reaching our earth from the star of ,,henderson2 and starting from ,,bessel',s star and moving at the same rate it could only reach us in ten years4 ,these are the nearest stars1 but there are others whose distances are immeasurably greater1 and whose light1 though starting from them at the beginning of creation1 may not have reached our globe6 ,the stars visible to the eye are about #c1jjj1 but the number increases with every increase of telescopic power1 and may be said to be innumerable4 ,they are not of uniform lustre or form1 but vary in figure and brightness4 ,some of them have a nebulous or cloudy appearance2 and there are entire clusters with this dusky aspect1 mostly pervaded1 however1 with luminous points of more brilliant hue4 ,in the outer fields of astral space ,sir ,,william ,,herschel observed a multitude of nebul1 one or two of which may be seen by the naked eye4 ,all of them1 when seen by instruments of low power1 look like masses of luminous vapour2 but some of them had brighter spots1 suggesting to ,sir ,,william the idea of a condensation of the nebulous matter round one or more centres4 ,but when these luminous masses are examined by more powerful instruments many of them lose their cloudy form1 and are resolved into shining points1 like spangles of diamond dust4 ,it is in this way several nebul have yielded to the gigantic reflector of ,lord ,,rosse1 and others with still greater optical resources may follow4 ,this brings us to the first questionable and controversial portion of the ,vestiges2 namely1--the ,,nebular ,,hypothesis4 ,it is among the gaseous bodies just described1 in the outer boundary of ,nature1 which neither telescope nor geometry can well reach1 that speculation has laid its venue1 and commenced its aerial castles4 ,,laplace was the first to suggest the nebular hypothesis1 which he did with great diffidence1 not as a theory proved1 or hardly likely1 but as a mathematical possibility or illustration4 ,his range of creation1 moreover1 was not so vast as that of our author1 which assumes to compass the entire universe1 but was limited to the evolution of the solar system4 ,the mode in which this might be evolved1 ,,laplace thus explains3-- ,he conjectures that in the original condition of the solar system the sun revolved upon his axis1 surrounded by an atmosphere which1 in virtue of an excessive heat1 extended far beyond the orbits of all the planets1 the planets as yet having no existence4 ,the heat gradually diminished1 and as the solar atmosphere contracted by cooling1 the rapidity of its rotation increased by the laws of rotatory motion1 and an exterior zone of vapour was detached from the rest1 the central attraction being no longer able to overcome the increased centrifugal force4 ,the zone of vapour might in some cases retain its form1 as we still see in ,saturn's ring2 but more usually the ring of vapour would break into several masses1 and these would generally coalesce into one mass1 which would revolve about the sun4 ,such portions of the solar atmosphere abandoned successively at different distances1 would form planets in the state of vapour4 ,these masses of vapour1 it appears from mechanical laws1 would have each its rotatory motion1 and as the cooling of the vapour still went on1 would each produce a planet that might have satellites and rings formed from the planet1 in the same manner as the planets were formed from the atmosphere of the sun4 ,all the known motions of the solar system are consistent and reconcileable with this theory of ,,laplace1 and upon it the author of the ,vestiges has enlarged and founded his wider scheme of physical creation4 ,he supposes the void of nature to have been originally filled with a universal ,,fire ,,mist 7p4 #cj71 out of which all the celestial orbs were made and put in motion4 ,how this mist was put in activity1 and resolved into the luminous and revolving bodies that we now see1 and one of which we inhabit is the first urgent perplexity to surmount in the conjecture4 ,it is manifest that if a mist filled the entire region of space1 a mist it must for ever remain1 unless acted upon by some cause adequate to give it new action and arrangement4 ,no sun1 no stars or planets could spontaneously emanate from an inert vapour any more than from nothing4 ,to meet this1 his first difficulty1 the author supposes that there were certain nuclei1 or centres of greater condensation1 analogous to those still remarked in the nebul of the heavens1 and that these nuclei1 by their superior attractive force1 consolidated into spheres the gaseous matter around them3-- ,of nebulous matter1 says he1 in its original state we know too little to enable us to suggest how nuclei should be established in it4 ,but supposing that from a peculiarity in the constitution nuclei are formed1 we know very well how1 by the power of gravitation1 the process of an aggregation of the neighbouring matter to these nuclei should proceed until masses more or less solid should be detached from the rest4 ,it is a well-known law in physics1 that when fluid matter collects towards1 or meets in a centre1 it establishes a rotatory motion4 ,see minor results of this law in the whirlpool and the whirlwind--nay1 on so humble a scale as the water sinking through the aperture of a funnel4 ,it thus becomes certain1 that when we arrive at the stage of a nebulous star we have a rotation on its axis commenced4 ,up to this1 however1 the author has proved nothing4 ,the existence of the fire-mist and nuclei are assumptions only1 and the way by which he tries to account for rotatory motion is clearly erroneous4 ,the aggregation of matter round the nuclei by gravitation would have no such tendency2 no more than a perfect balance would of itself have a tendency to move about its fulcrum1 or a falling stone to deviate from its vertical course4 ,gravitation would indeed compress the particles of matter1 but its tendency and entire action is towards the nucleus2 it compresses them no more on one side of the line of their direction to the centre of force than on any other side2 and hence no lateral or rotatory motion would ensue4 ,rotation1 therefore1 is yet unaccounted for2 though the author says it is a well-known law in physics that when fluid matter collects towards1 or meets in a centre1 it establishes a rotatory motion2 and then for illustration refers to a whirlwind or whirlpool4 ,no such effect would follow the conditions stated1 and an entire ignorance is betrayed of the laws of mechanical philosophy4 ,in the whirlpool and the whirlwind the gyration is caused by the fluid passing1 not to the centre1 but through it and away from it2 in the whirlpool downwards through the place of exit1 in the whirlwind upwards to where the vacuum has caused the rapid aggregation4 ,,laplace was too able a mathematician to commit these elementary blunders2 he did not assume to account for rotation by inapplicable laws1 but took for granted that the sun revolved upon its axis1 and thence communicated a corresponding motion to the bodies thrown from its surface4 ,but our author has sought to advance beyond his teacher1 and in this way has shown his ignorance of physics by an egregious mistake4 ,at this point we might stop1 without following the ulterior steps by which the solar system is made to evolve out of heated vapour4 ,having got rotation1 though by an impossible process1 the author falls into the illustration already given of the theory of ,,laplace4 ,the rotation of each nucleus or sun round its axis produces centrifugal force2 that force1 by refrigeration1 increases beyond the centripetal force of gravity2 in consequence rings are formed and detached from the surface1 whose unequal coherence of parts mostly causes them to break into separate masses or planets1 partaking of the motion of the bodies from which they have been separated1 and these primaries in their turn becoming centres of gravitation and centrifugal force1 throw off their secondaries1 or moons4 ,in this way the solar system and other systems upon a similar plan of arrangement1 it is conjectured1 may have been formed4 ,according to the author the generative process is still in progress1 and new worlds are in course of being thrown off from new suns in the confines of creation4 ,these nebulous stars on the outer bounds of space1 of varying forms and brightness1 are supposed to be the centres of new systems in different stages of development1 like children of various ages and growth in a numerous family4 ,this is the author's own illustration 7p4 #bj71 and after giving it he proceeds3-- ,precisely thus1 seeing in our astral system many thousands of worlds in all stages of formation1 from the most rudimental to that immediately preceding the present condition of those we deem perfect1 it is unavoidable to conclude that all the perfect have gone through the various stages which we see in the rudimental4 ,this leads us at once to the conclusion that the whole of our firmament was at one time a diffused mass of nebulous matter1 extending through the space which it still occupies4 ,so also1 of course1 must have been the other astral systems4 ,indeed1 we must presume the whole to have been originally in one connected mass1 the astral systems being only the first division into parts1 and solar systems the second4 ,the first idea which all this impresses upon us is1 that the formation of bodies in space is still and at present in progress4 ,we live at a time when many have been formed1 and many are still forming4 ,our own solar system is to be regarded as completed1 supposing its perfection to consist in the formation of a series of planets1 for there are mathematical reasons for concluding that ,mercury is the nearest planet to the sun1 which can1 according to the laws of the system1 exist4 ,but there are other solar systems within our astral systems1 which are as yet in a less advanced state1 and even some quantities of nebulous matter which have scarcely begun to advance towards the stellar form4 ,on the other hand1 there are vast numbers of stars which have all the appearance of being fully formed systems1 if we are to judge from the complete and definite appearance which they present to our vision through the telescope4 ,we have no means of judging of the seniority of systems2 but it is reasonable to suppose that among the many1 some are older than ours4 ,there is1 indeed1 one piece of evidence for the probability of the comparative youth of our system1 altogether apart from human traditions and the geognostic appearances of the surface of our planet4 ,this consists in a thin nebulous matter1 which is diffused around the sun to nearly the orbit of ,mercury1 of a very oblately spheroidal shape4 ,this matter1 which sometimes appears to our naked eyes1 at sunset1 in the form of a cone projecting upwards in the line of the sun's path1 and which bears the name of the ,zodiacal ,light1 has been thought a residuum or last remnant of the concentrating matter of our system1 and thus may be supposed to indicate the comparative recentness of the principal events of our cosmogony4 ,supposing the surmise and inference to be correct1 and they may be held as so far supported by more familiar evidence1 we might with the more confidence speak of our system as not amongst the elder born of ,heaven1 but one whose various phenomena1 physical and moral1 as yet lay undeveloped1 while myriads of others were fully fashioned1 and in complete arrangement4 ,thus1 in the sublime chronology to which we are directing our inquiries1 we first find ourselves called upon to consider the globe which we inhabit as a child of the sun1 elder than ,venus and her younger brother ,mercury1 but posterior in date of birth to ,mars1 ,jupiter1 ,saturn1 and ,uranus2 next to regard our whole system as probably of recent formation in comparison with many of the stars of our firmament4 ,we must1 however1 be on our guard against supposing the earth as a recent globe in our ordinary conceptions of time4 ,from evidence afterwards to be adduced1 it will be seen that it cannot be presumed to be less than many hundreds of centuries old4 ,how much older ,uranus may be1 no one can tell1 far less how much more aged may be many of the stars of our firmament1 or the stars of other firmaments1 than ours4 ,all this is ingenious and fluently expressed4 ,the author has an easy way of surmounting his difficulties by the use of such little auxiliary phrases1 as of course1 it may be surmised1 it is reasonable to suppose1 and so on2 which1 though trifling in themselves1 help him in their connecting inferences through many embarrassing perplexities4 ,but his hypothesis is yet unproved2 his fire-mist is only a conjecture2 his nuclei1 scattered like so many eggs in space out of which future suns and worlds are in process of incubation1 is of the same description1 and rotation1 the first step in his process of creation1 would not ensue under the conditions he has assigned4 ,without dwelling on these shortcomings1 we shall terminate this portion of the author's inquiry with a few general strictures4 ,first1 on its inconsistency with what we know of the solar system2 and1 secondly1 on its inadequacy to explain the facts of which we are cognizant on our own globe4 ,in the first place1 for the hypothesis to be applicable to our system1 it is requisite that the primary and secondary bodies should revolve1 both in their orbits and round their axes1 in one direction1 and nearly in one plane4 ,most of the bodies of the system observe these laws1 their orbits are nearly circular1 nearly in the plane of the original equator of the solar rotation1 and in the direction of that rotation4 ,but there are exceptions2 the comets1 which intersect the equatorial plane in every angle of direction form one1 and the most distant of the planets forms another4 ,the satellites of ,uranus are retrograde4 ,they move from east to west in orbits highly inclined to that of their primary1 and on both accounts are exceptions to the order of the other secondary bodies4 ,our author is so perplexed by this inconsistency that he first doubts the fact1 and next tries to explain it by alleging that it may be owing to a bouleversement of the primary4 ,what is meant by the bouleversement of a planet none of his critics seem to apprehend1 nor do we4 ,but that the moons of ,uranus are contrariwise to those of the other planets1 ,sir ,,john ,,herschel has indubitably established2 so that the author at any rate upon this point has sustained a bouleversement4 ,our own moon forms a third exception to his theory4 ,according to his system1 this satellite is a slip or graft from our planet1 and in constitution1 it might be inferred1 would partake of the elements of the parent4 ,but the fact is otherwise4 ,the moon has no atmosphere1 no seas1 or rivers1 nor any water1 and of course totally unfit for human inhabitants1 or organic life of any kind4 ,it must1 then1 have had a different origin1 or be in some earlier stage of development than that through which our earth has passed4 ,leaving these exceptions1 we may next inquire into the relevant purposes of the nebular hypothesis1 supposing its assumptions acquiesced in4 ,like the fanciful theories of the ancient philosophers1 it seems only to involve a profitless topic of controversy1 without solving natural phenomena4 ,it does not unravel the mystery of the beginning1 brings us no nearer to the first creative force4 ,like a good chemist1 previous to analysis1 the author first throws all matter into a state of solution2 but granting him his fire-mist and nuclei in the midst1 how or whence came this condition and arrangement of nature8 ,what was its pre-existing state8 or1 if that be answered1 how or whence was that preceding state educed1 for it1 too1 must have had one prior to it8 ,so that the mind makes no advances by such inquiries1 is lost in a maze that can have no end1 because it has no beginning2 and1 like ,noah's messenger1 for want of a resting place1 is compelled to return to the first starting point4 ,easier1 and quite as satisfactory1 it seems to believe1 as we have been taught to believe1 that the celestial spheres were at once perfect and entire1 projected into space from the hands of the maker1 than that they were elaborated out of luminous vapour by gravity and condensation4 ,hopeless inquiry is thus foreclosed1 an inquisition that cannot be answered1 silenced1 and removed out of the pale of discussion4 ,it is not from any attribute of the ,deity being impugned that the hypothesis is objectionable4 ,design and intelligence in the creation are left paramount as before1 and our impression of the skill exercised1 and the means employed1 only transferred to another part of the work4 ,he who produced the primordial condition the author supposes1 who filled space with such a mist1 composed of such materials1 subjected to such laws1 such constitution1 that sun1 moon1 and stars necessarily resulted from them1 appears omnipotent as ever4 ,but it does not advance inquiry1 nor assist us in explaining the wonders we contemplate in our own globe4 ,suppose a planet formed by the author's process1 what kind of a body would it be8 ,something1 as ,professor ,,whewell suggests1 resembling a large meteoric stone4 ,how after wards came this unformed mass to be like our earth1 to be covered with motion and organization1 with life and general felicity8 ,what primitive cause stocked it with plants and animals1 and produced all the surprising and subtle contrivances which we find in their structure1 all the wide and profound mutual dependence which we trace in their economy8 ,is it possible to conceive1 as the ,vestiges inculcate1 that man1 with his sentiment and intellect1 his powers and passions1 his will and conscience1 were also produced as the ultimate result of vapourous condensation8 ,one more conjecture of the author1 in this division of his subject1 we shall only notice4 ,it is that the formation of bodies in space is still in progress4 ,what may be doing in the nebul1 in the region scarcely within reach of telescopic vision1 in what may be considered the yet uninclosed and commonable waste of the universe1 is a subject1 we suspect1 of much obscurity1 and respecting which no precise intelligence has been received2 but limiting attention to the solar system1 which is nearer home and more within cognizance1 the work seems finished1 perfect1 and unchangeable1 and1 like the ,great ,architect1 made to endure for ever4 ,this was the conclusion of ,,laplace2 he proved that the state of our system is stable2 that is1 the ellipsis the planets describe will always remain nearly circular1 and the axis of revolution of the earth will never deviate much from its present position4 ,he also gave a mathematical proof that this stability is not accidental1 but the result of design1 of an arrangement by which the planets all move in the same direction1 in orbits of small eccentricity and slightly inclined to each other4 ,reasoning from analogy1 as the author of the ,vestiges is prone to do--extending our views from our solar system to other systems--other suns and revolving planets--it is fair to conclude that they are not less perfect in arrangement--subject to like conditions of permanency1 and alike exempt from mutation1 decay1 collision1 or extinction4 ,descending from this high region1 we accompany the author to his next and lower field--the ,,earth ,,and ,,its ,,geological ,,history4 ,our globe is somewhat less than #h1jjj miles in diameter2 it is of a spheroidal form1 the equatorial exceeding the polar axis in the proportion of #cjj to #bii1 and which slight inequality1 in consequence of its diurnal revolution1 is necessary to preserve the land near the equator from inundation by the sea4 ,the mean density or average weight of the earth is1 in proportion to that of distilled water1 as #e4ff to #a4 ,so that its specific gravity is considerably less than that of tin1 the lightest of the metals1 but exceeds that of granite1 which is three times heavier than water4 ,descending below the surface1 the first sensation that strikes is the increase of temperature4 ,this is so rapid1 that for every one hundred feet of sinking we obtain an increase of more than one degree of ,fahrenheit's thermometer4 ,if there be no interruption to this law1 and no reason exists to conclude there is1 it is manifest that at the depth of a few miles we must reach an intensity of heat utterly unbearable4 ,hence it follows that by no improvements in machinery can mining operations be carried down to a great depth below the surface4 ,the greatest depth yet penetrated does not exceed three thousand feet1 and forms a very small advance towards the earth's centre1 distant #d1jjj miles4 ,geologists1 however1 without penetrating far into the earth1 have found means for obtaining an insight for several miles into its interior structure1 and armed with hammer1 chisel1 and climbing hook1 they explore the beetling sea-cliff1 traverse the deepest valleys1 and scale the highest mountains1 carefully examining their formation1 disposition1 and substance1 and are thus enabled to obtain some knowledge of the earth's stomach1 as it were1 by scrutinising the deposits and eruptive ejectments on its surface4 ,for example1 we come to a mountain composed of a particular substance with strata or beds of other rock lying against its sloped sides2 we1 of course1 infer that the substance of the mountain dips away under the strata that we see lying against it4 ,suppose that we walk away from the mountain across the turned-up edges of the stratified rocks1 and that for many miles we continue to pass over other stratified rocks1 all disposed in the same way1 till we begin to cross the opposite edges of the same beds2 after which we pass over these rocks all in reverse order1 till we come to another extensive mountain composed of similar materials to the first1 and shelving away under the strata in the same way2 we should then infer that the stratified rocks occupied a basin formed by the rocks of these two mountains1 and by calculating the thickness right through these strata could say to what depths the rock of the mountain extended below4 ,in this way has the interior of the globe been examined1 and its contents and arrangement1 for several miles below the surface1 ascertained4 ,the result of such inspection we leave the author of the ,vestiges to describe3-- ,it appears that the basis rock of the earth1 as it may be called1 is of hard texture1 and crystalline in its constitution4 ,of this rock1 granite may be said to be the type1 though it runs into many varieties4 ,over this1 except in the comparatively few places where it projects above the general level in mountains1 other rocks are disposed in sheets or strata1 with the appearance of having been deposited originally from water4 ,but these last rocks have nowhere been allowed to rest in their original arrangement4 ,uneasy movements from below have broken them up in great inclined masses1 while in many cases there has been projected through the rents rocky matter more or less resembling the great inferior crystalline mass4 ,this rocky matter must have been in a state of fusion from heat at the time of its projection1 for it is often found to have run into and filled up lateral chinks in these rents4 ,there are even instances where it has been rent again1 and a newer melted matter of the same character sent through the opening4 ,finally1 in the crust as thus arranged1 there are1 in many places1 chinks containing veins of metal4 ,thus1 there is first a great inferior mass1 composed of crystalline rock1 and probably resting immediately on the fused and expanded matter of the interior3 next1 layers or strata of aqueous origin2 next1 irregular masses of melted inferior rock that have been sent up volcanically and confusedly at various times amongst the aqueous rocks1 breaking up these into masses1 and tossing them out of their original levels4 ,this1 we believe1 is a correct outline of the crust of the earth1 so far as it has been possible to observe it4 ,it exhibits extraordinary signs of commotion and vicissitude2 the lowest rocks indicating a previous condition of igneous fusion2 those above them of aqueous solution4 ,fire and water have thus been the chief tellurian anarchists1 and the shaking of continents and the constant shifting of level in sea and land still continue to attest their restless energies4 ,that igneous matter has1 during many periods1 been protruded from below--that mountains have risen in succession from the sea1 and injected their molten substance through cracks and fissures of superincumbent strata--are facts resting on indubitable evidence4 ,many masses of granite became the solid bottom of some portions of the sea before the secondary strata were laid gradually upon them4 ,the granite of ,mont ,blanc rose during a recent tertiary period4 ,we can prove1 says ,professor ,,sedgwick1 more than mere shiftings of level1 and that many portions of sea and land have entirely changed their places4 ,the rocks at the top of ,snowdon are full of petrified sea-shells2 the same may be said of some high crests of the ,alps1 ,pyrenees1 and ,andes4 ,we have proof demonstrative that many parts of ,scotland1 and that all ,england1 formed1 during many ages1 the solid bottom of the sea4 ,it may be true that the antagonist powers of nature during the human period have reached a kind of balance4 ,but during all geological periods there have been such long intervals of repose1 or of such gradual movements1 that we may trace the history of the earth in the successive deposits formed in the waters of the sea4 ,this is the great business of geology4 ,although at first sight the interior of the earth appears a confused scene1 after careful observation we readily detect in it a regularity and order from which much instructive light is thrown on its past vicissitudes4 ,the deposition of the aqueous rocks and the projection of the volcanic have unquestionably taken place since the settlement of the earth in its present form4 ,they are1 indeed1 of an order of events which are going on under the agency of intelligible causes1 down to the present day4 ,we may therefore consider these generally as recent transactions4 ,but advancing to the far distant antecedent era of its existence1 we may consider it to have been a globe of its present size enveloped in the crystalline rock already described1 with the waters of the present seas and the present atmosphere around it1 though these were probably in considerably different conditions1 both as to temperature and their constituent materials1 from what they now are4 ,we may thus presume that1 without this primitive case of granitic texture1 the great bulk of the matters of our earth were agglomerated1 whether in a fluid or solid state is uncertain2 but there cannot be any doubt that they continue to exist in a condition of great heat and compression1 having a mean density of more than double that of the minerals on the surface4 ,judging from the results and still observable conditions1 it may be inferred that the heat retained in the interior of the globe was more intense1 or had greater freedom to act1 in some places than in others4 ,these become the scenes of volcanic operations1 and in time marked their situations by the extrusion from below of trap and basalts--rocks composed of the crystalline matter1 fused by intense heat1 and developed on the surface in various conditions1 according to the particular circumstances under which it was sent up2 some1 for example1 being thrown up under water1 and some in the open air1 which contingencies would make considerable difference in its texture and appearance4 ,it would1 however1 be a mistake to infer that1 previous to these eruptions1 the earth was a smooth ball1 with air and water playing round it4 ,geology tells us plainly that there were great irregularities--lofty mountains1 interspersed with deep seas--and by which1 perhaps1 the mountains were wholly or partially covered4 ,but it is a fact worthy of observation that the solids of our globe cannot for a moment be exposed to water or the atmosphere without becoming liable to change4 ,they instantly begin to wear down4 ,the matter so worn off being carried into the neighbouring depths and there deposited1 became the components of the successive series of stratified rocks1 extending from the basal envelope of granite to the earth's surface1 and which it will be proper briefly to describe4 ,,deposits ,,or ,,rock ,,formations4 ,the first of the series is the ,gneis and ,mica ,slate ,system1 of which examples are exposed to view in the ,highlands of ,scotland and the west of ,england4 ,these earliest stratified rocks contain no matters which are not to be found in the primitive granite4 ,they are the same in material--silica1 mica1 quartz1 or hornblende--but changed into new forms and combinations1 and hence called by ,mr4 ,,lyell metamorphic rocks4 ,some of them are composed exclusively of one of the materials of granite2 the mica schist1 for example1 of mica2 the quartz rocks1 of quartz4 ,in the metamorphic rocks no organic remains have been found1 and they are geologically below all the rocks that do contain traces of animal life4 ,from the primary rocks we pass into the next ascending series1 called the ,clay ,slate and ,grauwacke ,slate ,system1 which in some places is found resting immediately on the granite1 the antecedent bed being there wanting4 ,this deposit has been well examined1 because some of its slate beds have been extensively quarried for domestic purposes4 ,by some geologists it is called the ,silurian ,system1 it being largely developed at the surface of a district of western ,england formerly occupied by the ,silures4 ,it is found also in ,north ,wales and in the north of ,england1 in beds of great thickness1 and in ,scotland1 but there the ,silurian rocks are more feebly represented4 ,the ,old ,red ,sandstone1 or ,devonian ,system1 comes next4 ,it forms the material of the grand and rugged mountains which fringe many parts of our ,highland coasts1 and ranges1 on the south flank of the ,grampians1 from the eastern to the western sea of ,scotland4 ,there is no part of geology and science more clear than that which refers to the ages of mountains4 ,it is as certain that the ,grampian mountains are older than the ,alps and ,apennines1 as it is that civilisation had reached ,italy and enabled her to subdue the world1 while ,scotland was the abode of barbarism4 ,the ,pyrenees1 ,carpathians1 and other ranges of continental ,europe are all younger than these ,scotch hills1 or even the insignificant ,mendip ,hills of southern ,england4 ,stratification tells this tale as plainly1 and more truly1 than ,,livy tells the story of the ,roman republic4 ,it tells us that at the time when the ,grampians sent streams and detritus to straits where now the valleys of the ,forth and ,clyde meet1 the greater part of ,europe was a wide ocean4 ,the last three series of strata contain the remains of the earliest occupants of the globe1 and of which we shall soon speak4 ,they are of enormous thickness--in ,england1 not much less than #cj1jjj feet1 or nearly six miles4 ,we have now arrived at the secondary rocks1 of which the lowest group is the ,carboniferous ,formation1 so called from its remarkable feature of numerous interspersed beds of coal4 ,it commences with beds of the mountain limestone1 which in ,england attains a depth of #hjj yards4 ,coal is altogether composed of the matter of a terrestrial vegetation1 transmuted by putrefaction of a peculiar kind beneath the surface of water1 and in the absence of air4 ,from examples seen at the present day at the mouths of such rivers as the ,mississippi1 which traverse extensive sylvan regions1 it is thought that the vegetation1 the rubbish of decayed forests1 was carried by rivers into estuaries1 and there accumulated into vast natural rafts1 until it sank to the bottom1 where an overlayer of sand or mud would prepare it for becoming a stratum of coal4 ,others conceive that the vegetation first went into the condition of peat moss1 that a sink in a level then exposed it to be overrun by the sea and covered with a layer of sand or mud2 that a subsequent uprise made the mud dry land1 and fitted it to bear a new forest1 which afterwards1 like its predecessors1 became a bed of peat--that1 in short1 by repetitions of this process the alternate layers of coal1 sand and shell constituting the carboniferous group were formed4 ,the ,magnesian ,limestone deposits succeed the carboniferous1 and sometimes pass into them by insensible gradations4 ,in the south of ,england they are represented by conglomerates1 and partly composed of the solid and more or less rounded fragments of the older strata4 ,they afford a proof of what geologists have often occasion to remark of the long periods of time during which the ancient works of nature were perfected2 for the older rocks were solid as they are now1 and their organic remains petrified at the time these conglomerates were forming4 ,we can only briefly glance at the remaining chapters of geological history4 ,the ,new ,red ,sandstone forms the base of the great central plains of ,england1 and is surmounted by the oliferous marls and red arenaceous beds which pass under the succession of great oolitic terraces that stretch across ,england from the coasts of ,dorsetshire to the north-eastern coast of ,yorkshire4 ,it marks the commencement of an important era1 being the strata in which land animals are first found4 ,the ,oolte ,system which follows marks the beginning of mammalia1 and in some of its beds in ,buckinghamshire are found the exuvi of tropical trees4 ,near ,weymouth1 in the well-known dirt beds1 are found trees with their silicified trunks growing up in the position of nature1 and their roots embedded in the soil on which they grew4 ,next we have the chalk or ,cretaceous ,formation1 that makes such a conspicuous figure in ,england4 ,the celebrated cliffs of ,dover are of this era4 ,it forms a stripe from ,yorkshire to ,kent1 and is found in ,france1 ,germany1 ,russia1 and in ,north ,america4 ,the ,english chalk beds are #a1bjj feet thick1 showing the considerable depth of the ocean in which they were formed4 ,their origin has been a questionable topic2 they were thought to be formed from the detritus of coral reefs1 but ,professor ,,ehrenberg has recently announced1 as the result of his microscopical researches1 that chalk is composed partly of inorganic particles and partly of shells of inconceivable minuteness1 a cubic inch of the substance containing about ten millions of them4 ,in the hollows of the chalk-beds have been formed series of strata--clay1 limestone1 marl alternating--to which the name of the ,tertiary ,system has been given4 ,it is irregularly distributed over vast surfaces of all our continents1 and must be considered as the beds of estuaries left at the conclusion of the cretaceous period4 ,london and ,paris rest on basins of this formation1 and another such basin extends from near ,winchester under ,southampton1 and reappears in the ,isle of ,wight4 ,we hasten upward to the ,diluvial ,system1 which brings us near to the present surface4 ,to this era is referred the erratic blocks1 or gigantic boulder stones1 which have been driven by floods across our continents1 or drifted in icebergs over valleys1 and perched sometimes on mountain tops4 ,to it also must be referred the till of ,scotland and the great brown clay of ,england1 and our vast beds of gravel and superficial rubbish1 connected with the deluvium in the history of ossiferous caverns1 of which that examined by ,dr4 ,,buckland at ,kirkdale is an example4 ,they occur in the calcareous strata1 as the great caverns generally do1 and have in all instances been naturally closed up till the period of their discovery4 ,at ,kirkdale the remains of twenty-four species of animals were found--namely1 pigeon1 lark1 raven1 duck1 partridge1 mouse1 water-rat1 rabbit1 hare1 hippopotamus1 rhinoceros1 elephant1 weasel1 fox1 wolf1 deer1 ox1 horse1 bear1 tiger1 hyena4 ,from many of the bones of the gentler of these animals being found in a broken state1 it is supposed that the cave was the haunt of hyenas and other predaceous animals1 by which the smaller ones had been consumed4 ,we come last to the ,modern or ,superficial ,formation1 of which the best specimen is the great ,bedford level1 that spreads over the lower lands of ,norfolk1 ,cambridgeshire1 and ,lincolnshire1 consisting of accumulations of silt1 drifted matter1 and bog-earth1 some of which began before the earliest periods of ,british history4 ,when these accumulations are removed by artificial means1 we find below sometimes shells of recent species1 and the remains of an old estuary1 sometimes sand-banks1 gravel beds1 stumps of trees1 and masses of drifted wood4 ,on this recent surface are found skulls of a living species of ,european bear1 skeletons of the ,arctic wolf1 ,european beaver and wild boar1 and numerous horns and bones of the roebuck and red deer1 and of the gigantic stag or ,irish elk4 ,they testify to a zoology on the verge of that now prevailing or melting into it4 ,in corresponding deposits of ,north ,america are found remains of the mammoth1 mastadon1 buffalo1 and other animals of extinct or living species4 ,considering it best not to interrupt the description of the successive formations1 this is almost the only allusion that has been made to the fossils which constitute so important a part of geological science4 ,it is now to be explained that from an early period1 that is1 from the metamorphic deposit to the close of the rock series1 each formation is found to enclose remains of the organic beings1 plants1 and animals1 which flourished upon earth during the time they were forming2 and these organisms1 or such parts of them as were of sufficient solidity1 have been in many instances preserved with the utmost fidelity1 although for the most part converted into the substance of the enclosing mineral4 ,the rocks may be thus said to form a kind of history of the organic departments of nature apparently from near their beginning to the present time4 ,it is upon the commencement and progress of life under these circumstances that the author of the ,vestiges of ,creation has put forth some of his most startling and controversial propositions2 but before noticing them it will be useful to prepare the way by shortly describing the gradations of organic existences1 following the same order as observed in the rock series1 by beginning with the lowest or humblest forms of organization4 ,,rise ,,and ,,progress ,,of ,,plants ,,and ,,animals4 ,the interior of the earth reveals wonders not less impressive than those of the skies4 ,we have seen in the last section how the crust of our globe is composed of successive layers or tiers of strata1 rising upward1 terrace upon terrace1 till we reach the present vegetable mould or superficial platform of animated existence4 ,in the aggregate these formations or systems1 marking the several epochs in nature's development1 may extend to a depth1 as ,dr4 ,,buckland conjectures1 of ten or fifteen miles below the surface1 and each may be considered a vast cemetery or graveyard1 entombing the remains of ages long anterior to human creation4 ,we1 in fact1 live upon a pile of worlds1 and anticipating the future from past records and from changes still manifest from the shallowing soundings of neighbouring seas1 it is not improbable that the existing scene of bustle may have heaped upon it as many superincumbent masses as the lowest of the rocks enclosing the vestiges of life4 ,if not with a kind of awe1 it must have certainly been with intense curiosity that the first investigators of fossilology looked upon the earliest forms of animated being of which we have any traces as existing upon this globe4 ,these first denizens1 however1 seem to have been of a simple structure and humble order1 not fit to play high class characters4 ,no land animals are found among them1 none which could breathe the atmosphere1 none but tenants of the water1 and even animals so high in the scale as fish were wanting4 ,in popular language1 the earliest fossils are corals and shellfish4 ,but to make the subject generally intelligible it will be necessary first to define the orders of the animal kingdom4 ,,cuvier was the first to give a philosophical view of the animal world in reference to the plan on which each animal is constructed4 ,according to him there are four forms on which animals have been modelled1 and of which ulterior divisions are only slight modifications founded on the development or addition of some parts that do not produce any essential change of structure4 ,the four great branches of the animal world are the vertebrata1 mollusca1 articulata1 and radiata4 ,the vertebrata are those animals which 7as man and other sucklers1 birds and fishes7 have a backbone and a skull with lateral appendages1 within which the viscera are excluded1 and to which the muscles are attached4 ,the mollusca or soft animals have no bony skeleton2 the muscles are attached to the skin1 which often include stony plates called shells2 such mollusca are shell-fish1 others are cuttle-fish1 and many pulpy sea animals4 ,the articulata consist of crustacea 7lobsters1 c471 insects1 spiders1 and annulos worms1 which1 like the other classes of this branch1 consist of a head and a number of successive portions of the body jointed together1 whence the name4 ,finally the radiata include the animals known under the name of zoophytes4 ,now it is fossils of the radiata division of the animal kingdom that are found in the lowest stratified rocks1 polypiaria and crinodia1 the first including various forms of these extraordinary animals 7corallines7 which still abound in tropical seas1 often obstructing the course of the mariner1 and even laying the foundation of new continents4 ,the crinoids are an early and simple form of the large family of star-fishes2 the animal is little more than a stomach1 surrounded by tentacula to provide itself with food1 and mounted upon a many-jointed stalk1 so as to resemble a flower upon its stem4 ,along with these in the slate system are a few lowly genera of crustacea1 and of a higher class1 the mollusca1 and the existence of these imply the contemporary existence of certain humbler forms of life1 vegetable and animal1 for their subsistence1 forming a scene approaching to what is found in seas of the present day1 excepting that fishes1 nor any higher vertebrata1 as yet roamed the marine wilds4 ,the animal species of this era seem to have been few in number1 and almost the whole had become extinct before the next group of strata had been formed4 ,in the ,silurian deposit the vestiges of life become more abundant1 the number of species extended1 and important additions made in the traces of sea plants and fishes4 ,remains of fishes have been detected in rocks immediately over the ,aymestry limestone1 being apparently the first examples of vertebrated animals which breathed upon our planet4 7p4 #fd74 ,the cephaloda1 represented in our era by the nautilus and cuttle-fish1 pertain to the ,silurian formation1 and are the most highly organised of the mollusca1 possessing in some families an internal bony skeleton1 together with a heart and a head with mandibles not unlike those of the parrot4 ,in the ,old ,red ,sandstone the same marine specimens are continued with numerous additions4 ,several of the strata are crowded with remains of fish1 showing that the seas in which these beds were deposited had swarmed with that class of inhabitants4 ,the predominating kinds are of an inferior model to the two orders which afterwards came into existence1 and still are the principal fishes of our seas2 the former are covered with integuments of a considerably different character from the true scales covering the latter1 and which orders1 from their form of organization1 are named stenoid and cycloid4 ,up to the present we find proofs of the general uniformity of organic life over the surface of the earth at the time when each particular system of rocks was formed4 ,the types of being formed in the old red as in preceding deposits1 are identical in species with the remains that occur in the corresponding class of rocks in ,brittany1 the ,hartz1 ,norway1 ,russia1 and ,north ,america2 attesting the similarity and almost universality1 if not contemporary character1 of terrestrial changes4 ,a few other geological facts may be here mentioned for recollection1 and which throw light on the marine animal and vegetable forms of this and preceding eras4 ,first there was comparatively an absence of salt in the early ocean2 and next the temperature of the earth is conjectured to have been higher1 and perhaps almost uniform throughout4 ,the higher temperature of the primeval times is attributed to the greater proximity or intensity of the globe's internal heat1 and which1 poured through cracks and fissures of the lately concreted crust1 ,m4 ,,brongniart supposes to have been sufficiently great to overpower the ordinary meteorological influences and spread a tropical climate all over its surface4 ,it must be further borne in mind that as yet no land animals or plants existed1 and for this presumable reason1 that dry land had not appeared4 ,it is only in the next or carboniferous formation that evidence is traced of island or continent4 ,as a consequence of this emergence there was fresh water2 for rain1 instead of returning to the sea1 as formerly1 was collected in channels of the earth and became springs1 rivers1 and lakes4 ,it was made a receptacle for an advance in organism1 and land plants became a conspicuous part of the new creation4 ,according to the ,vestiges of ,creation1 terrestrial botany began with classes of comparatively simple forms and structure4 ,in the ranks of the vegetable kingdom the lowest place is taken by plants of cellular tissue1 and which have no flowers1 as lichens1 mosses1 fungi1 ferns1 and sea-weeds4 ,above these stand plants with vascular tissue1 bearing flowers1 and of which there are two subdivisions3 first1 plants having one seed-lobe1 and in which the new matter is added within1 of which the cane and palm are examples2 second1 plants having two seed lobes1 and in which the new matter is added on the outside under the bark1 of which the pine1 elm1 oak1 and all the ,british forest trees are examples4 ,now the author of the ,vestiges states that two-thirds of the plants of this era belong to the cellular kind1 but to this one of his ablest critics 7,edinburgh ,review for ,july7 demurs1 asserting that the carboniferous epoch shows a gorgeous flora--that the first fruits of vegetable nature were not rude1 ill-fashioned forms1 but in magnificence and complexity of structure equal to any living types1 and that the forest approached the rank and complicated display of a tropical jungle1 where the prevalence of great heat with great moisture1 combined with the fact that the atmosphere contained a greater proportion of the natural food of plants1 must undoubtedly have forcibly stimulated vegetation1 and in quantity and luxuriance of growth1 if not fineness of organization1 produced it in rich abundance4 ,the earth1 it is likely1 was one vast forest1 which would perform a most important part for the good of its future inhabitants1 helping to purge the air of its excess of carbonic acid1 by which the earth's surface would be prepared for its new occupants4 ,the animal remains of this era are not numerous in comparison with those that go before or follow4 ,contrary to what the author of the ,vestiges supposes 7p4 #aaa71 insects were already buzzing in the air2 there were1 however1 no crawling reptiles on the ground1 and it is a doubtful point whether birds cheered the ancient forests with their song4 ,but fishes reached their most perfect organic type4 ,they were the lords of creation1 and had a structure in conformity with their high office4 ,since then the class has increased in its species1 but has degenerated to a less noble type4 ,in the next formation1 the ,new ,red ,sandstone1 reptiles make their appearance4 ,they are considered next to fishes in the zoological scale4 ,so nearly are they sometimes connected1 that it is doubtful to which class they belong4 ,many reptiles are also amphibious1 adapted either to water or land4 ,the surface of the globe abounded in large flat1 muddy shores1 and was suited to the new order of visitants called into existence4 ,in the ,oolite ,system1 mostly consisting of calcareous beds1 mammals make their appearance4 ,some additions were made to the reptile form4 ,one animal 7the behemite7 appeared1 but terminated in the next era4 ,in the following series of rocks mammals increase in abundance4 ,the advance in land animals is less marked1 but considerable in the tertiary strata4 ,the tapir forms a conspicuous type4 ,one animal of the kind was eighteen feet long1 and had a couple of tusks turning down from the lower jaw1 by which it could attach itself1 like the walrus1 to a bank1 while its body floated in the water4 ,many animals of a former period disappear1 and are replaced by others belonging to still existent families--elephant1 hippopotamus1 and rhinoceros--though extinct as species4 ,some of these forms are startling from their size4 ,the great mastadon was a species of elephant living on aquatic plants1 and reaching the height of twelve feet4 ,the mammoth was another elephant1 and supposed to have survived till comparatively recent times4 ,the megatherium is an incongruity of nature1 of gigantic proportions1 yet ranking in a much humbler order than the elephant1 that of the edenta1 to which the sloth1 ant-eater1 and armadilla belong4 ,the megatherium had a skeleton of enormous solidity1 with an armour-clad body1 and five toes1 terminating in huge claws to grasp the branches on which it fed4 ,finally1 beside the dog1 cat1 squirrel1 and bear1 we have offered to us1 for the first time1 oxen1 deer1 camel1 and other specimens of the rumantia4 ,traces of the quadrumane1 or monkey1 have been found in the older tertiaries of ,france1 ,india1 and ,england4 ,so that we may now be said to have arrived at the zoological forms not long antecedent to the appearance of the chief of all1 bimana1 or man1 and shall here pause to consider the conclusions of the author of the ,vestiges of ,creation on the origin of the organic existences that have been successively exhibited4 ,it will be convenient1 however1 first to introduce a synoptic view of the evolutions of the earth as set forth in this and the preceding section4 ,for this purpose the author has introduced a parallel table1 exhibiting on one side a scale of animal life beginning with the humblest and ascending to the highest species2 and on the other side the successive series of rock formations1 in which their fossiliferous remains have been found up to the present superficial deposits of the globe4 ,objections have been made to the correctness of the author's analogies1 scale1 and his classification of animals1 the chief of which will be adverted to in the next section2 but the table is essential1 as presenting at one view an outline of the hypothesis he has sought to establish4 ,,scale ,,of ,,animal ,,kingdom4 ,,order ,,of ,,animals ,,in ,,ascending ,,series ,,foetal ,,human ,,brain ,,of ,,rocks4 ,,resembles1 ,,in ,invertebrata4 #a ,infusoria ,traces of ,infusoria787 #a ,gneiss and ,mica ,slate ,system #b ,polypi ,polypiaria #e ,echinodermata ,echinodermata #g ,brachiopoda #ae-bj ,brachiopoda ,crustacea #b ,clay ,slate ,system #ast month1 typically1 ,moll- #i ,pteropoda ,artic-,crustacea ,pteropoda _/ that of an usca #aj ,gasteropoda ulata #ab-ad ,gasteropoda ,annelides _/ _/ avertebrated animal #aa ,cephalopoda ,annelides ,cephalopoda _/ #c ,silurian system _/ ,vertebrata4 ,remains of ,fishes _/ _/ ,fishes of low type2 #cb-cf ,fishes heterocercal2 allied #d ,old ,red ,sandstone #bnd month1 that of a fish2 to crustacea _/ _/ ,sauroid ,fishes #cg ,batrachia 7frogs1 c47 ,batrachia #e ,carboniferous #ci ,sauria 7lizards1 c47 ,sauria _/ formation #dj ,chelonia 7tortoises7 ,chelonia _/ #crd month1 that of a turtle2 #da-df ,birds ,footsteps of ,birds #f ,new ,red ,sandstone #dth month1 that of a bird2 #dg ,cetacea 7dolphins1 whales1 c47 ,bones of a ,cetaceous ,animal #g ,oolite ,bones of a ,marsupial _/ #h ,chalk #dh ,pachydermata 7tapirs1 c47 ,pachydermata #di ,edentata 7sloths7 ,edentata #ej ,rodentia 7squirrels1 hare1 c47 ,rodentia #eth month1 that of a rodent2 #ea ,marsupialia 7opossums1 c47 ,marsupialia #eb ,ruminantia 7oxen1 stag1 c47 ,ruminantia #fth month1 that of a ruminant2 #ec ,amphibia 7seals7 #i ,tertiary #ed ,digitigrada 7dog1 cat1 c47 ,digitigrada _/ #gth month1 that of a digitigrade animal2 #ee ,plantigrada 7bear1 c47 ,plantigrada _/ #ef ,insectivora 7shrew1 c47 ,insectivora _/ #eg ,cheiroptera 7bats7 ,cheiroptera _/ #eh ,quadrumana 7apes7 ,quadrumana _/ #hth month1 that of the quadrumana2 #bi ,bimana 7man7 ,bimana #aj ,superficial deposits #ith month1 attains full human character4 ,,transmutation ,,of ,,species4 ,in the two last sections we have gone through the earth's geological history1 first of the changes in its physical structure1 next of the mutations in the organic forms that have1 in serial order1 appeared in the successive strata of its external envelope1 from the period of that far distant crisis when it was a molten globe on which its primitive granitic covering was just beginning to concrete1 in consequence of abating heat1 until we have arrived at the first prognostic signs of approaching human existence4 ,the rock upon rock of vast thickness1 by which the earth's crust1 through countless ages1 has been formed1 unquestionably constitutes a most extraordinary phenomenon of physical creation1 but hardly so marvellous and incomprehensible as the beginning1 progress1 and end of the divers orders of marine and terrestrial beings that filled each world of life4 ,it is to geologists1 to ,,playfair1 ,,hutton1 ,,lyell1 ,,buckland1 ,,sedgwick1 ,,owen1 and other great names1 native and foreign1 to whom we are indebted for this singular revelation of ,nature's works4 ,it is their unwearied research that has opened to us the surprising spectacle we have attempted briefly to describe of the diversified groups of species which have1 in the course of the earth's history1 succeeded each other at vast intervals of time2 one set of animals and plants wholly or partly disappearing from the face of our planet1 and others1 which apparently did not before exist1 becoming the only or predominant occupants of the globe4 ,now the great question arises--whence1 by what power1 or by what law1 were these reiterated transitions brought about8 ,were the organized species of one geological epoch1 by some long-continued agency of natural causes1 transmuted into other and succeeding species8 or were there an extinction of species1 and a replacement of them by others1 through special and miraculous acts of creation8 or1 lastly1 did species gradually degenerate and die out from the influence of the altered and unfavourable physical conditions in which they were placed1 and be supplanted by immigrants of different species1 and to which the new conditions were more congenial8 ,the last1 we confess1 is the view to which we are most inclined--first1 because we think a transmutation of species1 from a lower to a higher type1 has not been satisfactorily proved2 and second1 because of the strong impression we entertain1 that the universe1 subject to certain cyclical and determinate mutations1 was made complete at first1 with self-subsisting provisions for its perpetual renewal and conservation4 ,we shall advert to this matter hereafter2 but at present it is the conclusions of the author of the ,vestiges that claim consideration4 ,he adopts the first interpretation of animal phenomena1 namely1 that there has been a transmutation of species1 that the scale of creation has been gradually advancing in virtue of an inherent and organic law of development4 ,nature1 he contends1 began humbly2 her first works were of simple form1 which were gradually meliorated by circumstances favourable to improvement1 and that everywhere animals and plants exhibit traces of a parallel advance of the physical conditions and the organic structure4 ,the general principle1 he inculcates1 is1 that each animal of a higher kind1 in the progress of its embryo state1 passes through states which are the final condition of the lower kind2 that the higher kinds of animals came later1 and were developed from the lower kinds1 which came earlier in the series of rock formations1 by new peculiar conditions operating upon the embryo1 and carrying it to a higher stage4 ,these conclusions the author maintains geology has established1 and of the results thence derived he gives the subjoined recapitulation3-- ,in pursuing the progress of the development of both plants and animals upon the globe1 we have seen an advance in both cases1 from simple to higher forms of organization4 ,in the botanical department we have first sea1 afterwards land plants2 and amongst these the simpler 7cellular and cryptogamic7 before the more complex4 ,in the department of zoology1 we see1 first1 traces all but certain of infusoria shelled animalcul2 then polypiaria1 crinoidea1 and some humble forms of the articulata and mollusca2 afterwards higher forms of the mollusca2 and it appears that these existed for ages before there were any higher types of being4 ,the first step forward gives fishes1 the humblest class of the vertebrata2 and1 moreover1 the earliest fishes partake of the character of the lower sub-kingdom1 the articulata4 ,afterwards come land animals1 of which the first are reptiles1 universally allowed to be the type next in advance from fishes1 and to be connected with these by the links of an insensible gradation4 ,from reptiles we advance to birds1 and thence to mammalia1 which are commenced by marsupialia1 acknowledgedly low forms in their class4 ,that there is thus a progress of some kind1 the most superficial glance at the geological history is sufficient to convince us4 ,now this appears plausible and conclusive1 but the correctness of the recapitulation here made1 and its conformity to actual nature1 have been sharply disputed4 ,it may be true that sea plants came first1 but of this there is no proof2 and of land plants there is not a shadow of evidence that the simpler forms came into being before the more complex3 the simple and complex forms are found together in the more ancient flora4 ,it is true that we first see polypiaria1 crinoidea1 articulata1 and mollusca1 but not exactly in the order stated by the author4 ,it is true that the next step gives us fishes1 but it is not true that the earliest fishes link on to the lower sub-kingdom1 the articulata4 ,it is true that we afterwards find reptiles1 but those which first appear belong to the highest order of the class1 and show no links of an insensible gradation into fishes4 ,in the tertiary deposit of the ,london clay the evidence of concatenation entirely fails4 ,among the millions of organic forms1 from corals up to mammalia of the ,london and ,paris basins1 hardly a single secondary species is found4 ,in the south of ,france it is said that two or three secondary species struggle into the tertiary strata2 but they form a rare and evanescent exception to the general rule4 ,organic nature at this stage seems formed on a new pattern--plants as well as animals are changed4 ,it might seem as if we had been transported to a new planet2 for neither in the arrangement of the genera and the species1 nor in their affinities with the types of a pre-existing world1 is there any approach to a connected chain of organic development4 ,for some discrepancies the author endeavours to account1 and it is fair to give his explanation3-- ,fossil history has no doubt still some obscure passages2 and these have been partially adverted to4 ,fuci1 the earliest vegetable fossils as yet detected1 are not1 it has been remarked1 the lowest forms of aquatic vegetation2 neither are the plants of the coal-measures the very lowest1 though they are a low form1 of land vegetation4 ,there is here in reality no difficulty of the least importance4 ,the humblest forms of marine and land vegetation are of a consistence to forbid all expectation of their being preserved in rocks4 ,had we possessed1 contemporaneously with the fuci of the ,silurians1 or the ferns of the carboniferous formation1 fossils of higher forms respectively1 equally unsubstantial1 but which had survived all contingencies1 then the absence of mean forms of similar consistency might have been a stumbling-block in our course2 but no such phenomena are presented4 ,the blanks in the series are therefore no more than blanks2 and when a candid mind further considers that the botanical fossils actually present are all in the order of their organic development1 the whole phenomena appear exactly what might have been anticipated4 ,it is also remarked1 in objection1 that the mollusca and articulata appear in the same group of rocks 7the slate system7 with polypiaria1 crinoidea1 and other specimens of the humblest sub-kingdom2 some of the mollusca1 moreover1 being cephalopods1 which are the highest of their division in point of organization4 ,perhaps1 in strict fact1 the cephalopoda do not appear till a later time1 that of the ,silurian rocks4 ,but even though the cephalopoda could be shewn as pervading all the lowest fossiliferous strata1 what more would the fact denote than that1 in the first seas capable of sustaining any kind of animal life1 the creative energy advanced it1 in the space of one formation1 7no one can say how long a time this might be17 to the highest forms possible in that element1 excepting such as were of vertebrate structure4 ,it may here be inquired if geologists are entitled to set so high a value as they do upon the point in the scale of organic life which is marked by the upper forms of the mollusca4 ,it will afterwards be seen that this is a low point compared with the whole scale1 if we are to take as a criterion that parity of development which has been observed in the embryo of one of the higher animals4 ,the human embryo passes through the whole space representing the invertebrate animals in the first month1 a mere fraction of its course4 ,there is indeed a remarkably rapid change of forms in such an embryo at first3 the rapidity1 says ,professor ,owen1 is 'in proportion to the proximity of the ovum to the commencement of its development2' and1 conformable to this fact1 we find the same zoologist stating that1 in the lowest division of the animal kingdom1 7the ,acrita of his arrangement17 there is a much quicker advance of forms towards the next above it1 than is to be seen in subsequent departments4 ,there is1 indeed1 to the most ordinary observation1 a rapidity and force in the productive powers of the lowest animals1 which might well suggest an explanation of that rush of life which seems to be indicated in the slate and ,silurian rocks4 ,with regard to the so-called early occurrence of fishes partaking of the saurian character1 ,i would say that their occurrence a full formation after the earliest and simplest fishes1 is1 considering how little we know of the space of time represented by a formation1 not early3 their being later in any degree is the fact mainly important4 ,the subsequent rise of new orders of fishes1 fully piscine in character1 may be explained by the supposition of their having been developed1 as is most likely1 from a different portion of the inferior sub-kingdom4 ,in short1 all the objections which have been made to the great fact of a general progress of organic development throughout the geological ages1 will be found1 on close examination1 to refer merely to doubtful appearances of small moment1 which vanish into nothing when rightly understood4 ,upon some of the chief points here involved1 it may be remarked that the most eminent physiologists are not agreed2 they are not agreed that animals can be arranged in a series1 passing from lower to higher2 nor that animals of a higher kind in the embryo state pass through the successive stages of the lower kinds2 the character of these stages1 in the asserted doctrine1 being taken from the brain and heart1 and man being the highest point of the series4 ,there are physiologists too who deny that the brain of the human embryo at any period1 however early1 resembles the brain of any mollusk or of any articulata4 ,it never1 they assert1 passes through a stage comparable or analogous to a permanent condition of the same organ in any invertebrate animal2 and in like manner the spinal cord in the human vertebr at no period agrees with the corresponding part of the lower kind of animals4 ,the moment it becomes visible in the human embryo1 it is entirely dorsal in position2 while in mollusks and articulatas a great part1 or nearly the whole1 is ventral4 ,the same is true of the heart1 or centre of the vascular system1 which has always a different relative position in the great nervous centre in the human embryo from what it has in any articulate animal1 and in most mollusks4 ,a second position in the ,vestiges appears not to have been established--namely1 as to the uniform geological arrangement of different organic structures4 ,it is not true that only the lowest forms of animal life are found in the lowest fossiliferous rocks1 and that the more complicated structures are gradually and exclusively developed among the higher bands in what might be called a natural ascending scale4 ,on the contrary1 the predaceous cephalopods and the highly organized crustaceous are among the oldest fossils4 ,such appears to be the order of nature as evidenced by facts1 and it must be admitted1 however repugnant to preconceived notions or mere mortal conjectural amendments4 ,in the third place the evidence seems to preponderate in favour of permanency of species4 ,there can be no doubt that both plants and animals may1 by the influence of breeding1 and of external agents operating upon their constitution1 be greatly modified1 so as to give rise to varieties and races different from what before existed4 ,but there are limits to such modifications1 as in the different kind and breed of dogs2 and no organized beings can1 by the mere working of natural causes1 be made to pass from the type of one species to that of another4 ,a wolf by domestication1 for example1 can never become a dog1 nor the ourang-outang by the force of external circumstances be brought within the circle of the human species4 ,in this opinion ,mr4 ,,lyell1 ,dr4 ,,prichard1 and ,mr4 ,,lawrence1 concur4 ,the general conclusion at which they have arrived is1 that there is a capacity in all species to accommodate themselves to a certain extent to a change of external circumstances2 this extent varying greatly according to the species4 ,there may thus be changes of appearance or structure1 and some of these changes are transmissible to the offspring2 but the mutations thus superinduced are governed by certain laws1 and confined within certain limits4 ,indefinite divergence from the original type is not possible1 and the extreme limit of possible variation may usually be reached in a short period of time2 in short1 ,professor ,,whewell concludes 7,indications of ,creation1 p4 #ef71 that every species has a real existence in nature1 and a transmutation from one to another does not exist4 ,thus for example1 ,,cuvier remarks that1 notwithstanding all the differences of age1 appearance and habits1 which we find in the dogs of various races and countries1 and though we have 7in the ,egyptian mummies7 skeletons of this animal as it existed #c1jjj years ago1 the relation of the bones to each other remains essentially the same2 and with all the varieties of their shape and size1 there are characters which resist all the influences1 both of external nature1 of human intercourse1 and of time4 ,what varieties1 again1 in the forms of the different breeds of horses and horned cattle2 racers1 hunters1 coach horses1 dray horses1 and ponies2 short-horns and long-horns1 ,devons and ,herefords1 polled galloways and ,shetlands2 how unlike are the unimproved breeds of cattle as they existed a century ago before the march of agricultural improvement began1 and how different were most of these as then existing in what may be called the normal state from the wild cattle produced in ,chillington ,park4 ,it has been found1 however1 when external and artificial conditions are removed1 and these different breeds are allowed to run wild1 as in the ,pampas and ,australia1 no matter what the diversity of size1 shape1 and colour of the domestic breeds1 they reverted in their wild state1 in these respects1 to their primitive types4 ,so again with regard to cultivated vegetables and flowers4 ,how different are the species of the red cabbage and the cauliflower2 who would have expected them to be varieties of the wild brassica oleracea8 ,yet from that they have been derived by cultivation4 ,they have1 however1 a tendency like animals to revert to the original type1 or1 in the gardener's phrase1 to degenerate1 which it requires the utmost care on his part to counteract4 ,when left to a state of nature1 they speedily lose their acquired forms1 properties and character1 and regain those of the original species4 ,if species be permanent--if no education or training can educe new kinds--if the higher classes of animals are not the results of meliorations of the lower--whence did they come8 ,this question we are not bound to answer4 ,it might be as reasonably asked1 whence did the lower classes come8 ,geology1 like other sciences1 does not conduct us to the beginning1 it only takes up creation at certain ulterior stages of development4 ,the changes and construction of the globe may have been different in different parts2 it has not been proved that geological revolutions have been either universal or contemporary4 ,there may have been climates and regions adapted to the existence of the higher class of land animals1 while contemporarily therewith other portions of the globe might be undergoing changes beneath the ocean4 ,it is not improbable that the human species dwelt nearly stationary for ages on the old continents of ,africa and ,asia1 while ,europe and ,america were covered with water4 ,supposing these new continents formed1 either by the gradual subsidence of the sea or the rising of its bed1 successive inhabitants would follow in the order presented by existing organic remains4 ,while covered by the sea1 what now form ,europe and ,america could only be peopled by marine animals2 but as the land rose or the waters subsided into their ocean channels1 and dry land appeared1 reptiles and amphibi might become the occupants2 next1 as the earth became drier and more salubrious1 the new continent would be resorted to by terrestrial animals2 in a still more advanced stage of purification and salubrity1 man himself1 as the lord of all the preceding classes of immigrants1 would take possession1 and as he still continues the living occupant it is premature to look for his petrifaction4 ,,origin ,,of ,,the ,,animated ,,tribes4 ,science has mastered many perplexities1 but is almost powerless as ever in generation4 ,all that lives1 and still more all that moves1 must have a pre-existing germ formed independently of the created being1 but which is essential to its existence1 and fixes the type of organization4 ,the old adage--omne animal ab ovo--may be taken as generally true4 ,but though every animal has its primordial egg or germ1 all germs are not identical4 ,in the beginning of life there are other organic elements besides the ovum4 ,partly on direct proof and partly on good analogy1 it may be inferred that these differ in different species--that each in the first stages of existence is bound by a different and immutable mode of development--and1 if so1 there can be no embryotic identity4 ,by no change of conditions1 says ,dr4 ,,clarke1 can two ova of animals of the same species be developed into different animal species2 neither by any provision of identical conditions can two ova of different species be developed into animals of the same kind4 ,if these views be right1 and we believe them to be so1 there cannot be a transmutation of species under the influence of external circumstances4 ,baffled in the effort either to create species or organically to change them1 attempts have been made to approach nearer to the source of vitality1 and explain the chemical1 electric1 or mechanical laws by which the vital principle is influenced4 ,for this purpose various hypotheses have been put forth2 one is the noted conjecture of ,lord ,,monboddo1 that man is only an advanced development of the chimpanzee or ourang-outang4 ,a second explanation is that given by ,,lamarck1 who surmised1 and with much ingenuity attempted to prove1 that one being advanced in the course of generations into another1 in consequence merely of the experience of wants calling for the exercise of faculties in a particular direction1 by which exercise new developments of organs took place1 ending in variations sufficient to constitute new species4 ,in this way the swiftness of the antelope1 the claws and teeth of the lion1 the trunk of the elephant1 the long neck of the giraffe have been produced1 it is supposed1 by a certain plastic character in the construction of animals1 operated upon for a long course of ages by the attempts which these animals make to attain objects which their previous organization did not place within their reach4 ,this is what is meant by the hypothesis of progressive tendencies1 and which requires for its validity not only the assumption of a mere capacity for change1 but of active principles conducive to improvement and the attainment of higher powers and faculties4 ,more recently ,,st4 ,,hilaire has published a paper in which he speaks of the immutability of species as a conviction that is on the decline1 and that the age of ,,cuvier is on the close4 ,carried away by what ,professor ,,phillips has called a poetical conjecture that cannot be proved1 this writer propounded the speculation that the present crocodiles are really the offspring of crocodilian reptiles1 the difference being merely the effect of physical conditions1 especially operating during long geological periods upon one original race4 ,the human species1 he contends1 are but an advanced development of the higher order of the monkey tribe1 and that the negroes are degenerating towards that type again4 ,according to him the sivatherium--a fossil animal that had been found in the ,himalaya mountains--was the primeval type that time had fined down into the giraffe from long-continued feeding on the branches of trees4 ,dr4 ,,falconer and ,capt4 ,,cautley1 however1 have shown that anatomical proofs are all against this inference1 but if any doubt remained it must yield to the fact1 that among the fauna of the ,sewalik hills the sivatherium and the giraffe were contemporaries4 ,the author of the ,vestiges of ,creation has put forth an hypothesis founded on the preceding conjectures1 but more compact and conclusive4 ,he is1 as we have seen1 in favour of the progressive change of species1 adopting the notion that men once had tails1 and that the rudiments of this condal appendage are found in an undeveloped state in the os coccygis 7p4 #aii47 ,his leading idea of the progress of organic life is that the simplest and most primitive type under a law to which that of like production is subordinate1 gave birth to the type next above it2 that this again produced the next higher1 and so on to the very highest1 the stages of advance being in all cases very small--namely1 from one species only to another2 so that the phenomenon has always been of a modest and simple character4 7p4 #bca47 ,the arguments by which the author endeavours to prove his hypothesis may be thus compressed4 ,according to him foetal development is a science1 illustrated by ,,hunter',s great collection of the ,royal ,college of ,surgeons1 and established by the conclusions of ,,st4 ,,hilaire and ,,tiedmann4 ,its primary positions are--#a4 ,that the embryos of all animals are not distinguishably different from each other2 and1 #b4 ,that those of all animals pass through a series of phases of development1 each of which is the type or analogue of the permanent configuration of tribes inferior to it in the scale4 ,higher the order of animals1 the more numerous its stages of progress4 ,man himself is not exempt from this law4 ,his first foetal form is that which is permanent in the animalcule2 it next passes through ulterior stages1 resembling successively a fish1 a reptile1 a bird1 and the lower mammalia before it attains its specific maturity4 ,the period of gestation determines the species2 protract it1 and the species is advanced to a higher class4 ,this might be done by the force of certain conditions operating upon the system of the mother4 ,give good conditions and the young she produces will improve in development2 give bad conditions and it will recede4 ,cases of monstrous birth in the human species are appealed to1 in which the most important organs are left imperfectly developed2 the heart1 for instance1 having sometimes advanced no further than the three-chambered or reptile form1 while there are instances of that organ being left in the two-chambered or fish-like form4 ,these defects arise from a failure of the power of development in the mother1 occasioned by misery or bad health1 and they are but the converse of those conditions that carry on species to species4 ,the differences of sexes is the result of foetal progress only one degree less marked than that of a change of species4 ,sex is fully ascertained to be a matter of development4 ,all beings are at one stage of the embryotic progress female4 ,a certain number of them are afterwards advanced to the more powerful sex4 ,for proof of this1 the economy of bees is cited2 when they wish to raise a queen-bee1 or true female1 they prepare for the larva a more commodious cell1 and feed it with delicate food4 ,but we shall here stop to remark on the author's argument up to this point4 ,it is manifest1 according to his hypothesis1 that neither sex nor species depend on the ancestral germ1 but simply on physical conditions and mechanical development4 ,but eminent physiologists deny that the facts are such as he has stated2 they deny1 as we have stated in a former section1 that the foetal progress is such as the ,vestiges represent them to be2 they deny that the human embryo1 for example1 exhibits in successive stages the form of fish1 lizard1 bird1 beast3 on the contrary1 they contend that it is only in the earliest period of the organic germ1 when the manifestations are almost too obscure for microscopic sense1 that any resemblance exists2 that immediately the organic germ becomes sensible to observation1 sex and species are found to be fixed4 ,take1 for example1 the vertebrata2 in these1 by some mysterious bond of union1 the organic globules are seen to arrange themselves into two nearly parallel rows4 ,we may then say that the keel of the animal is laid down1 and in it we have the first rudiments of a backbone and a continuous spinal chord4 ,but during the progress and completion of this first organic process no changes have been observed assimilating the nascent embryo to any of the inferior animals4 ,the next series of changes in the germinal membrane are of two kinds--in one the nervous system1 the organs of motion1 the intestinal canal1 the heart and blood-vessels are manifested2 the other set of changes1 which are subsequent1 produce the perfection of the animal and determine its sex4 ,all these manifestations result from germinal appendages that cannot be severed or changed without ruin to the embryo1 and the conditions essential to life as the structure advances are due temperature1 due nutriment of the nervous organs1 and due access to the atmospheric air4 ,without1 therefore1 pursuing further this part of the inquiry1 we shall remark that the question at issue between the ,vestiges and its opponents is one of facts--of conflicting evidence--to be tried by the jury of the public1 or rather by those who1 from science or professional pursuits1 are competent to form an authoritative opinion4 ,our own conclusion is1 that in face of the testimony adduced against it1 the author's hypothesis is not yet established4 ,for proof that species do change1 and that even new species have been actually and recently produced1 the author has adduced statements certainly as questionable and little satisfactory as his representation of foetal phenomena4 ,we can only briefly enumerate them4 ,first we are told that oats sown at midsummer1 if kept cropped down1 so as to be prevented shooting into ear1 and then allowed to remain in the ground over winter1 will spring up next year in the form of rye 7p4 #bbf74 ,this need not be disputed about2 the experiment can be easily tried2 but if rye were the result1 it would be no conclusive proof of a translation of species4 ,perhaps the oat-plants perished under the operation of repeated cuttings1 and the rye seed was dormant in the earth and sprung up in its place2 or1 if not so1 oats and rye may not be different species1 only varieties of the same species4 ,they are scarcely more dissimilar than the primrose1 the cowslip1 and the oxlip1 which have all been raised from the seed of the same plant1 and are now regarded by botanists as varieties instead of species4 ,when lime is laid on waste ground we are told that white clover will spring up spontaneously1 and in situations where no clover-seed could have been left dormant in the soil 7p4 #ahb74 ,but how is this to be proved8 ,it is certain that seeds will remain dormant in the soil for centuries1 and then spring up the first year the soil is turned up by the plough4 ,some seeds have retained their vitality for thousands of years in the old tombs of ,egypt2 they have been repeatedly brought to ,england1 sown1 and produced good wheat4 ,we are next told that wild pigs never have the measles1 they are produced by a hyatid and the result of domestication2 that a tinea is found in dressed wool that does not exist in its unwashed state2 that a certain insect disdains all food but chocolate1 and that the larva of oinopota cellaris only lives in wine and beer4 ,all these are articles manufactured by man1 and are adduced as proofs of animal life1 independent of any primordial egg4 ,the entoza are dwelt upon2 they are creatures living in the interior of other animals1 of which the tape-worm that infests the human body is a melancholy instance4 ,in these illustrations we think the author has some show of reason1 for we feel convinced that there is such a thing as spontaneous generation from the inorganic substance1 wisely provided for clearing the earth of noxious effluvia and putrid matter1 and converting them into new elements conducive to health and life4 ,we believe in this source of vitality from its wisdom and necessity1 its necessity and wisdom1 in our estimate1 being strong presumptive proofs of its existence in harmony with the general forecast and economy of nature4 ,of the self-originating spring of life1 some of the examples adduced by the author are proofs1 and of which we have familiar illustrations in cheese-mites1 maggots in carrion1 and the green fly that breeds so profusely in weak and decaying vegetation2 in all which by some inscrutable law the organic germ1 without an antecedent1 appears to evolve from the dead or putrifying mass for its riddance and transmutation4 ,conceding1 however1 thus far to the author1 we are not prepared to admit that the creative powers of ,messrs4 ,,crosse and ,,weekes has been established4 ,these gentlemen are said 7p4 #aij7 to have introduced a stranger in the animal kingdom1 a species of acarus or mite amidst a solution of silica submitted to the electric current4 ,the insects produced by the action of a galvanic battery continued for eleven months are represented as minute and semi-transparent1 and furnished with long bristles4 ,one of the creatures resulting from this elaborate term of gestation was observed in the very act of emerging1 in its first-born nudity1 and sought concealment in a corner of the apparatus4 ,some of them were observed to go back into the parent fluid and occasionally they devoured each other2 and soon after they were called to life1 they were disposed to multiply their species in the common way6 ,so much for the experiment2 against its verity it is alleged1 first1 that the ,acarus ,crossii are not a new species1 or if new1 that neither ,mr4 ,,crosse nor ,mr4 ,,weekes1 who repeated ,mr4 ,,crosse',s experiment1 produced them1 but only aided by the voltaic battery the development of the insects from their eggs4 ,such a mode of generation is contrary to all human experience1 and can only be believed in on the strongest corroborative proof4 ,neither by chemistry nor galvanism can man1 we apprehend1 be more than instrumental and co-operative1 not originally and independently creative4 ,in almost every form of life1 whether animal or vegetable1 art can multiply varieties1--can train1 direct--but cannot form new species4 ,this is the mockery of science4 ,with all its invention and resource1 it cannot produce organic originals4 ,it can rear a crab-apple into a golden-pippin1 or wild sea-weed into a luxuriant cabbage2 it can raise infinite varieties of roses1 tulips1 and pansies1 but can create no new plant1 fruit1 or flower4 ,man can make a steam-engine1 or a watch1 but he cannot make a fly1 a midge1 or blade of grass4 ,he is an ingenious compiler1 but not a creator2 and his powers of manufacture and conversion are restricted within narrow boundaries4 ,he cannot wander far in the indulgence of his fancies without being recalled1 and compelled to return to the first models set by the ,great ,architect4 ,the further he strays from primitive types in the effort to improve1 by crossing1 cutting1 and grafting1 and proportionably less becomes the procreative force4 ,hybrids are notoriously sterile4 ,garden fruit is not permanent1 and requires to be renewed from seed4 ,the law seems universal in plants and animals1 that the vital energy or germ is less forcible and prolific in the pampered and artificial1 than in the natural and wild races4 ,,hypothesis ,,of ,,the ,,vital ,,principle4 ,it is ascertained that the basis of all vegetable and animal substances consists in nucleated cells--that is1 cells having granules within them4 ,nutriment is converted into these before being assimilated by the system4 ,it has likewise been noted that the globules of the blood are reproduced by the expansion of contained granules2 they are1 in short1 says the ,vestiges1 distinct organisms multiplied by the same fissiporous generation4 ,so that all animated nature may be said to be based on this mode of origin2 the fundamental form of organic being is a globule1 having a new globule forming within itself1 by which it is in time discharged1 and which is again followed by another and another1 in endless succession4 ,it is of course obvious1 that if these globules could be produced by any process from inorganic elements1 we should be entitled to say that the fact of a transit from the inorganic to the organic had been witnessed4 7p4 #agf47 ,globules1 the author continues1 can be produced in albumen by electricity4 ,if1 therefore1 these globules be identical with the cells which are now held to be reproductive1 it might be said that the production of albumen by artificial means is the only step in the process wanting4 ,this has not yet been effected4 7p4 #agg47 ,these are the advances towards generation by chemistry and electricity4 ,the process1 however1 according to this detail1 appears still far from complete4 ,albumen is to be produced by artificial means2 and even then we should doubt entire success4 ,chemists have long commanded the power to resolve the seeds of animal and vegetable life into their elements2 they have analysed them1 and shown the exact weight and proportion of each constituent2 but they never could put them together again1 or1 by any similar compound produce the primordial egg or organic germ1 from which a living being would arise4 ,a connecting link--a vital spark1 or animating soul--is always wanting to complete the existence of the ,prometheus of the laboratory4 ,mark1 too1 the if1 and the might1 in this most lame and impotent hypothesis3--,if1 therefore1 these globules be identical with the cells which are held to be reproductive1 it might be said1 c4 ,globules can be easily produced2 the passage of the electric fluid through water will produce aerial globules in rapid and expansive movement2 boys can produce them with suds and a tobacco-pipe in rapid succession1 each1 for aught we know1 containing a granule that multiplies by fissiporous generation4 ,but these are not organic globules1 and the author has committed the great perversion in language or logic of confounding the organic globule of life with the inorganic globule of a chemist4 ,his theory is more fanciful than that of ,,lamarck1 from whom it is derived1 and who had1 at least1 his petit corps gelatineux to begin with--to commence weaving organic tissue from--but our author's organic globule is not so substantive a conception2 and as he does not pretend to be able to produce even this by physical means1 he has not made a single step in generation4 ,this we consider the least satisfactory and successful portion of the author's work4 ,it assigns no intelligible cause for the origin of life--it only begs the question1 by the substitution of one mystery for another4 ,his law of ,,development is of the same description1--without sense or significancy1 unsupported by applicable facts1 and is not so comprehensible a cause of vital changes as ,,lamarck',s assigned progressive tendencies of animals to master the appliances essential to their wants4 ,,animal ,,affinities1 ,,instinct1 ,,and ,,reason4 ,the scheme of the ,vestiges is uniformly and consistently worked out2 all phenomena are resolved into gravitation and development--the first as the law of inorganic1 the latter of organic matter4 ,by the last1 however1 no new principle is revealed1 only a new phrase devised1 by the amplified application of which the author's entire system may be said to be begged rather than proved2 since development is used in a sense implying an indefinite power of animate and inanimate creation2 so that at last we make no new discovery1 only grasp a new nomenclature4 ,but the author is always interesting1 either by the novel display of facts or the ingenious concatenation of plausibilities4 ,consistently with his fundamental notion of animal transmutation1 he tries to prove a family likeness or affinity from the humblest to the highest species4 ,in this way he seeks to explain the marvel with respect to the huge bulk of many of the tertiary mammalia--the mammoth1 mastadon1 and megatherium2 they were in immediate descent from the cetacea1 or whale and dolphin tribe4 7p4 #bfg47 ,again1 human reason is considered no exclusive gift2 it exists subordinately in the instinct of brutes1 and is alleged to be nothing more than a mode of operation peculiar to the faculties in a humble state of endowment1 or early stage of development4 ,,cuvier and ,,newton are only intellectual expansions of a clown2 and this notion is extended to moral obliquities1 the wicked man being characterised as one whose highest moral feelings are rudimental4 7p4 #ceh47 ,from a like principle the writer concurs with ,dr4 ,,prichard1 that mankind may have had a common origin2 that there exists no diversities of colour or osseous structure not referable to climatable or other plastic agencies influencing the development of the different races1 commencing with the lowest1 or ,negro tribe1 and ascending upward through the intermediate aboriginal ,american1 ,mongolian1 and ,malay1 to the last and most perfect stage of the ,caucasian type4 ,into the verity of these conclusions we are not called upon to enter2 they have been long in controversy1 involve a great array of facts and inductive inferences1 and we have only referred to them as corollaries or collaterals of the author's hypothetical fabric4 ,,religious ,,and ,,moral ,,tendencies4 ,we have no charge of impiety to bring against the ,vestiges4 ,final causes1 or to express ourselves more intelligibly1 a purpose in creation1 is nowhere impugned4 ,the ,deity is not degraded by impersonification in the form and frailties of mortality1 but everywhere the author reverently bows to that august and unsearchable name1 acknowledges the grand and benevolent design--the admirable adaptation of every created thing to its end and place1 and finally concludes in a strain of grateful and exulting ,optimism1 that we confess we have not fully arrived at--namely1 that everything is very good4 7p4 #chg47 ,from this impression we have only one constructive drawback to notice in the author's mechanical but fanciful constitution of the universe1 by which a special ,providence in the government of the world seems to be dispensed with1 and the ,almighty is placed in the sinecure position of the ,grand ,elector of the ,abbe ,,sieyes1 with nothing to do4 ,but no divine attribute is abscinded--no glory of ,omnipotence dimmed--whether it pleases him to rule by direct interpositions of power1 or his own pre-ordained eternal laws4 ,still less can we detect in the speculative inquiries of the ,vestiges conclusions hostile to the moral and social interests of the community4 ,men are formed to be what they are2 vice and crime are the fruits of malorganization1 and malorganization is the result of the unfavourable conditions in which the subject of it has been placed1 prior or subsequent to birth4 ,these are the author's leading metaphysical inculcations4 ,they impose grave duties upon individuals and upon society1 rightly understood and applied1 but we cannot discern a hurtful tendency in them4 ,they are useful knowledge1 knowledge that it would be well for parents and rulers to master1 by showing the importance of education1 of favourable circumstances1 and of good moral and physical training1 for rearing happy1 well-ordered1 and virtuous members of the community4 ,supreme in intelligence1 man1 we firmly believe1 is not less supremely blessed in the means of felicity1 provided his real nature and position in the scheme of creation were understood1 recognised1 and carried out4 ,he has his place1 his office1 and his destiny2 he is no enigma but as an individual2 in the mass1 as the author emphatically remarks1 he is a mathematical problem4 ,his conduct is uniform and consistent2 the result of known and ascertainable causes--causes calculable and predicable in their consequences1 as the statistics of crime have incontestibly established4 ,,general ,,conclusions ,,on ,,the ,,vestiges4 ,the heavens are wonderful1 and the earth is wonderful1 and man1 who1 by force of intellect1 has sought to comprehend the immensity of one and unravel the formation of the other1 is hardly less wonderful than either4 ,still the great mystery remains unriddled2 our researches have brought us no nearer the beginning1 and the first cause of all continues unapproachable and undefinable as ever4 ,instead of explaining physical creation1 we begin with it2 we take the existence of matter for granted1 and its attributes for granted1 and forthwith begin to fabricate a universe1 without first ascertaining whence was matter1 or whence the laws by which it is impressed1 and has been governed in its evolutions4 ,nature's greatest phenomena are the celestial spaces and the bodies that fill them2 our own planet and its living occupants4 ,upon each of these1 their commencement and subsequent vicissitudes1 the ,vestiges of ,creation have propounded an hypothesis1 but one mystery is only sought to be explained by another still more mysterious4 ,for the fiat of a ,creator chemical affinities and mechanical laws have been substituted1 but aided by these the author has failed to produce a world such as we find it4 ,hence we are again driven upon the old tradition1 the old sacred authority1 that the world was created out of nothing2 and this is as easy to comprehend as the solution of the ,vestiges1 that it sprang from that which is certainly next to nothing--a heated fog or universal fire-mist4 ,when the author deals with the facts of science he interests and instructs1 but when he speculates he only amuses or perplexes1 without advancing knowledge4 ,his terse and luminous description of the astral firmament deeply impresses with the might and the magnitude of the vast design2 but when he attempts to account for the elimination of suns and worlds1 their formation and arrangement1 we are struck by the puerile folly of his conjectural presumptions4 ,descending from this august and glittering canopy to our own planet1 we are not less astonished by the exhibition of the extraordinary revolutions it has undergone4 ,geology is the true historian of the earth4 ,conducted by the lights it affords1 we see an eternity of ages has rolled before us2 we discover a series of worlds rising through the depths of ocean from the central sphere of heat1 amidst boiling floods and volcanic fires1 each new platform of existence1 that countless periods of time had been requisite to form1 peopled with its own congenial forms of organic life1 mostly commencing with the simpler1 and ascending by almost imperceptible gradations to the higher and more complex structures of being4 ,we are struck by the correspondence1 by the pari passu development and formation of the earth's crust and organic existences1 and we are apt hastily to conclude that a relation has subsisted between them1 that contemporary changes have been cause and effect1 and that the improvement of the earth produced the correlative improvement in animals and plants4 ,this forms the author's second questionable hypothesis2 it is plausible1 but false--repugnant to fact and correct observation4 ,we have no credible evidence that species have changed1 or are changeable by the utmost efforts of art or favouring conditions2 all we can effect is to improve them within definite limits1 but not alter their characteristic types2 and we have certain proof that neither man nor the animal nearly next to him in organization1 has changed either in habits1 disposition1 form1 or osseus structure during the last #c1jjj years4 ,resemblance is no proof of identity2 and hence1 though species run into each other by almost inappreciable shades of difference1 it is no proof that they are derivative1 or other than isolated and self-dependent creations4 ,that they are such1 and shall continue such1 seems a fixed canon of ,nature1 who1 apparently1 has prescribed to each its circle of amendment and range1 that like shall beget like--that nought organic shall exist without ancestral germ--and that the variety of species which constitutes the beauty and order of nature shall by no chance1 contrivance1 or mingling of races1 be confounded4 ,geological facts are in favour of this conclusion4 ,they attest the appearance of new species1 not their improvement4 ,in each species a gradation of improvement1 approximating from a lower to the next higher organism1 is not perceptible2 but each seems to have been made perfect at first1 and most suited to the co-existent state of the earth4 ,the earliest reptiles were not reptiles of inferior structure2 nor the earliest fishes1 birds1 or beasts4 ,they were adapted1 as we now find them1 to their precise sphere of existence1 without progressive aptitude1 preparatory to a higher and translated condition of being4 ,geology rather points to the extinction and degeneracy of species than their improvement2 and the fossils of the old red sandstone1 and of the carboniferous formation1 attest a loftier and more magnificent creation of both marine and land products than any now subsisting4 ,for these and other reasons before adduced1 we dismiss the hypothesis of animal transmutation as unproved and untenable4 ,it pleases and satisfies superficial views1 but confronted with the facts of nature1 it vanishes like a baseless vision4 ,man is sui generis1 sole and exclusive in organization1 without pre-existing type or affinity to other species2 and his alleged recent metamorphosis from a monkey1 and his first and far more distant one from a snail or a tadpole1 are paradoxes only worthy of idle debating clubs4 ,having attempted to unfold the progression of species by his law of development1 the author next essays to explain the commencement of the vital principle itself4 ,but here1 too1 he must have a beginning1 and his organic globule answers a similar purpose1 in deducing the mystery of life1 as his nuclei in the nebular hypothesis4 ,in both the perplexity and real difficulty is not solved or mastered1 but evaded4 ,but we have already remarked on the point1 and shall only observe that when the author can elicit thought from inorganic matter1 either by chemistry or galvanism1 we shall think he has made a step in creation4 ,until then he does not advance1 only deceives himself and readers by verbal subtleties and baseless suppositions4 ,apart from its hypotheses1 the ,vestiges form a valuable and interesting work4 ,it is the most complete1 elaborate1 and--with all its faults of detail1 logic1 and inference--the most scientific expositor of universal nature yet offered to the world4 ,but its hypotheses are unwarranted1 not inductively derived1 and can have no hold on men of science1 supported as they mostly are by fanciful analogies1 facts misunderstood or misstated1 and illustrations selected without discrimination or applicability4 ,theories do sometimes conduce to the discovery of truth1 but are often obstructive2 occupy the mind1 like theological controversy1 without advancing science2 and are viewed with the same aversion by the philosopher that the political abstractions tendered to the multitude by the demagogue are viewed by the patriotic legislator4 ,the work1 however1 will live1 and deserves to live4 ,the temple of nature has been looked into1 not profoundly1 perhaps1 nor always successfully2 but in a fearless spirit1 and with a highly-accomplished mind4 ,had the divine ,,cosmos been more fully dwelt upon and depicted--had the harmony1 beauty1 and beneficence of creation been more fully and exclusively displayed--we should have been more gratified2 but we are thankful1 in the main1 for what we have received4 ,an impulse has been given to popular inquiry1 and a vast field for discussion opened1 from which we can prospectively discern neither less love for man1 nor reverence for ,god4 ,who the author is we have no certain knowledge4 ,it is not1 we suspect1 ,lord ,,king1 nor ,lord ,,thurlow1 nor ,lady ,,byron2 but it may be the author of the ,essay on the ,formation of ,opinions1 and of the ,principle of ,representation4 ,mr4 ,,bailey1 of ,sheffield1 though little known1 possesses the fine reasoning powers1 intellectual grasp1 independence of research1 abstract analysis1 and attic style1 that would qualify him to produce the ,vestiges of ,creation1 though we never heard that he is a great natural philosopher4 ,but1 as just hinted1 deep science is not evinced by the ,vestiges1 only an able1 systematic1 and tasteful arrangement of its distant and recent advances4 ,,explanations3 ,a ,,sequel ,,to ,,the ,,vestiges ,,of ,,the ,,natural ,,history ,,of ,,creation4 7,from the ,,atlas of ,december #bj1 #ahde47 ,so many strong objections had been arrayed against the ,vestiges of ,creation1 that the author was called upon to elucidate and reinforce his argument1 or abandon the ground he had taken up4 ,the more candid and equitable of his judges--those who were disposed to try him upon the merits1 and independently test the claims of his inquiry1 as in fairness it ought to be1 as strictly a scientific speculation1 regardless of any constructive bearings it might have on current opinions or prejudices--could not arrive at any more favourable conclusion than that he had failed to establish his hypotheses4 ,indeed this was the only verdict that could be safely delivered in4 ,the impugners of the work were in the same helpless predicament as its author1 who had1 however1 more venturously presumed to unravel unsearchable mysteries1 concerning which1 in the existing state of science1 men can only conjecture1 wonder1 and adore1 utterly unable to affirm or deny aught respecting them4 ,what1 for instance1 with the remotest semblance of certainty1 can be predicated of the stellar orbs8 ,is it not idle almost to speculate on the impenetrable secret of their origin when their very existence is undefinable--when their end1 their glittering discs1 and all but immeasurable distances are wholly unapproachable8 ,nor hardly less beyond our grasp is the commencement of organic existences4 ,we do pride ourselves on recent advances to the sources of entity2 we tear up the dead1 we torture the living1 and sedulously chronicle every beat of the heart and vibration of the brain to slake an insatiable curiosity1 yet how unsatisfactory our reach towards the hidden springs of life--how limited our attainments1 when the creation of a single blade of grass1 the humblest worm1 a poor beetle1 or gadfly1 would baffle the utmost structural skill of the greatest philosopher6 ,into the fathomless depths of our own globe we have also essayed to penetrate4 ,poor beings6 of three score and ten1 whose utmost historical span extends only to some thousands of years1 have sought to trammel up the terrene vicissitudes of millions of ages anterior to their own existence6 ,does not this savour of a vain research1 or of a laudable thirst for knowledge8 ,over all these dark and solemn inscrutabilities1 however1 the ,vestiges undertook to throw a glare of light1 to reveal their beginning1 progression1 order1 relations1 and law of development4 ,although daring in aim1 the attempt was not to be wholly deprecated4 ,while religious freedom had been secured1 philosophy had become timid1 official1 and timeserving2 retentive as ,,fontenelle of the truths within its grasp1 and fearful to give utterance to aught that might disturb the stillness of the temple1 the lecture-room1 or fashionable auditory4 ,modern teachers had been used so long to the ,baconian go-cart1 that they had become as apprehensive of losing the inductive clue as the ,,palinuruses of old of the sight of the directing shore4 ,but the time had arrived when it seemed expedient to relax the strictness of the investigative rule1 and afford scope for a more systematic1 if not speculative research4 ,science had made great acquisitions1 and it seemed desirable1 if only for experiment sake1 to see what kind of ,,frankenstein would result from the architectural union of her scattered limbs4 ,this formed the scope of the ,vestiges of ,creation2 novelties were not propounded1 only a portentous skeleton raised from the truths physical astronomy1 geology1 chemistry1 physiology1 and natural history had established4 ,does the author recoil from his work8 ,no2 these ,explanations attest that he is steadfast in the worship of the idol of his brain4 ,he retracts nothing1 he re-asserts1 elucidates1 and often dexterously turns the weapons of the most formidable and orthodox of his adversaries against them1 by showing from their writings that they had1 in detail at least1 acquiesced in the truths that they now1 in a generalised form1 seek to controvert and repudiate4 ,so much adroitness and pertinacity in the author can hardly fail to provoke resistance1 if not asperity1 despite of the imperturbable temper in which he maintains the combat4 ,the learned have been disturbed in their daily routine1 by the discharge from an unknown hand1 of a massive pyrites1 that has diffused as much consternation among the herd of modish elocutionists1 college tutors1 and chimpanzee professors1 as ,jove's ligneous projectile among the lieges of the standing pool4 ,for this commotion we have1 on a former occasion1 conceded that there existed valid reasons1 and we hasten to see the way in which they have been met in the rejoinder before us2 contenting ourselves1 as we needs must1 by briefly noticing some of the salient points of the controversy4 ,first of the ,nebular ,hypothesis4 ,the chief objection to this theory is1 that the existence of nebulous matter in the heavens is disproved by the discoveries made by the telescope of the ,earl of ,,rosse4 ,by the reach of this wondrous tube1 masses of light1 rendered apparently nebulous by their vast distance1 have been resolved into clusters of stars1 and thence the assumption seemed unwarrantable that any luminous matter1 different from the solid bodies composing planetary systems existed in the heavenly spaces4 ,but to this the author replies1 that there are two classes of nebul--one resolvable into constellations--another comparatively near1 that remains unaffected by telescopic power1 and that until this last description can be separated1 the nebular hypothesis is not disproved4 ,it is thus brought to an issue of facts1 both as to the existence of nebul of this latter kind1 and the optical power to resolve them into distinct stars4 ,but the author can hardly claim this negative success in grappling with a second objection--namely1 his assumed origin of rotatory motion4 ,according to him1 a confluence of atoms round a spherical centre of attraction1 would cause the agglomerated mass to revolve upon its axis in the manner of our earth4 ,this was denied by everybody the least acquainted with the laws of motion2 and thus did one of his imaginary solutions of a great phenomenon of the universe fall dead to the ground4 ,this he now seems to concede1 but in a sentence unintelligible to us1 in which an undoubted physical law is spoken of as only an abstract truth 7p4 #bj74 ,he obviously still clings to his first mistaken inference1 and calls to his aid ,professor ,,nichol1 whom he has also pressed into his service to help him over the last-mentioned difficulty by the ,professor's affirmation of a diversity of nebulous clusters4 ,but the ,professor does not commit himself to the extent of the author2 his aqueous whirlpool is cited from ,,herschel1 only in illustration1 and correctly said to be produced by the unequal force of convergence of a fluid to a common centre4 ,but the author's nuclei1 disposed in his notable fire-mist1 did not act with unequal force on the ambient vapour1 and whose central convergence in consequence1 would not produce rotation or motion of any kind4 ,this was the real matter in question1 the author was taken up on his own premises1 and the results he assumed to follow from them proved to be inconsistent with the unquestionable laws of gravitating matter4 ,he has gone over the geological portion of his subject with much care1 but if competent1 it would be impossible within our narrow limits to accompany him2 nor could the discussion be made either interesting or intelligible except to the scientific1 who have devoted attention to an extremely curious1 but still obscure and unsettled field of investigation4 ,he has elaborately cleared up many points1 and successfully1 we think1 answered some weighty objections1 but we are not yet converts to his theory of organic development4 ,one passage we shall extract2 after adverting to the facts established by powerful evidence1 that during the long term of the earth's existence1 strata of various thickness were deposited in seas composed of matter worn away from the previous rocks2 that these strata by volcanic agency were raised into continents1 or projected into mountain chains1 and that sea and land have been constantly interchanging conditions4 ,he continues3-- ,the remains and traces of plants and animals found in the succession of strata show that1 while these operations were going on1 the earth gradually became the theatre of organic being1 simple forms appearing first1 and more complicated afterwards4 ,a time when there was no life is first seen4 ,we then see life begin1 and go on2 but whole ages elapsed before man came to crown the work of nature4 ,this is a wonderful revelation to have come upon the men of our time1 and one which the philosophers of the days of ,newton could never have expected to be vouchsafed4 ,the great fact established by it is1 that the organic creation1 as we now see it1 was not placed upon the earth at once2 it observed a ,,progress4 ,now we can imagine the ,deity calling a young plant or animal into existence instantaneously2 but we see that he does not usually do so4 ,the young plant and also the young animal go through a series of conditions1 advancing them from a mere germ to the fully developed repetition of the respective parental forms4 ,so1 also1 we can imagine ,divine power evoking a whole creation into being by one word2 but we find that such had not been his mode of working in that instance1 for geology fully proves that organic creation passed through a series of stages before the highest vegetable and animal forms appeared4 ,here we have the first hint of organic creation having arisen in the manner of natural order4 ,the analogy does not prove identity of causes1 but it surely points very broadly to natural order or law having been the mode of procedure in both instances4 ,to the allusion in the last sentence there can be no demur2 that there is natural order or law in creation who will contest8 ,but it is the author's law and the author's order that are in dispute--his transmutation of species1 the higher classes emerging from and partly annihilating the lower1 under meliorated conditions of being4 ,that the simpler form of organic life should first appear2 that remains of invertebrated animals should be first found2 then1 with these1 fish1 being the lowest of the vertebrated2 next1 reptiles and birds1 which occupy higher grades2 and finally1 along with the rest1 mammifers1 the highest of all--all this appears natural enough4 ,how could it be otherwise8 ,when the earth was a slimy bed1 what but the lowest forms of life--the mollusca1 and other soft animals1 without bony structure--could possibly live in or occupy it8 ,during the carboniferous era1 when the earth was enveloped in an atmosphere of hydrogen1 vegetation might thrive2 but man1 and animals like him1 dependent on vital air1 could not exist2 nor are remains of them found in this epoch of the globe's vicissitudes4 ,all this is comprehensible4 ,but the perplexing inquiry is1 whence did the successive grades of animals emerge8 ,that they could not contemporaneously exist2 when the whole earth was a shoreless sea1 and that animals could not live is certain2 but were they created in succession by the ,divine fiat1 or did they emerge1 as our author supposes and elaborately tries to prove1 from the humblest primitive forms1 by an inscrutable law of progression--evidenced1 he contends1 by geological facts--though by some his facts are disputed--and certainly not confirmed by any animal changes observable within the limits of human experience8 ,there is another alternative offers1 which would dispense both with the author's hypothesis and the need of successive organic creations by a special ,providence4 ,is it a geological fact1 since life began1 that the earth has simultaneously undergone throughout its entire surface the revolutions assigned to it8 ,may it not always1 from that period1 have consisted1 as it now does1 of water and dry land1 alternately changing their sites1 but always apart1 and allowing of the contemporary existence on some portion of its surface of all the varieties of tribes ever found upon it8 ,the fossiliferous rocks that formed the primeval sea-beds could only be deposited by the abrasion from the anterior and higher rocks4 ,it has always appeared to us that this conjecture is worthy of consideration1 and1 if found tenable1 would reconcile many perplexities4 ,upon subjects so obscure1 and to which the human intellect has been only recently directed1 it is not surprising that men of science have not arrived at uniformity of conclusion4 ,unable to reconcile phenomena with positive knowledge1 there are names of no mean repute who would reserve certain domains of creation as the fields of special interventions4 ,to this class ,dr4 ,,whewell appears to belong1 who assumes that events not included in the course of nature have formerly taken place4 ,in the same way ,professor ,,sedgwick1 to account for the appearance of certain animals1 says1 ,they were not called into being by any law of nature1 but by a power above nature4 ,he adds1 they were created by the hand of ,,god1 and adapted to the conditions of the period4 ,to this the author of the ,vestiges assents1 with the explanation 7p4 #acd7 that their existence was not the result of a special exertion of power to meet special conditions1 but of an antecedent and primitive law of development suited to the new exigencies1 and emanating from the ,creator4 ,this1 he contends1 does not lower our estimate of the ,divine character2 and1 in proof1 cites ,dr4 ,,doddridge1 who cannot be suspected of irreverence4 ,when we assert1 says the pious and amiable author1 a perpetual ,divine agency1 we readily acknowledge that matters are so contrived as not to need a ,divine interposition in a different manner from that in which it had been constantly exerted4 ,and it must be evident that an unremitting energy1 displayed in such circumstances1 greatly exalts our idea of ,god1 instead of depressing it2 and1 therefore1 by the way1 is so much more likely to be true4 ,against constructive inferences it is urged1 in the ,explanations-- ,as to results which may flow from any particular view which reason may show as the best supported1 ,i must firmly protest against any assumed title in an opponent to pronounce what these are4 ,the first object is to ascertain truth4 ,no truth can be derogatory to the presumed fountain of all truth4 ,the derogation must lie in the erroneous construction which a weak human creature puts upon the truth4 ,and practically it is the true infidel state of mind which prompts apprehension regarding any fact of nature1 or any conclusion of sound argument4 ,the writer then quotes ,sir ,,john ,,herschell as having some years ago announced views strictly conformable to those subsequently taken of organic creation in the ,vestiges3-- ',for my part1' says ,sir ,john1 ',i cannot but think it an inadequate conception of the ,creator1 to assume it as granted that his combinations are exhausted upon any one of the theatres of their former exercise1 though1 in this1 as in all his other works1 we are led1 by all analogy1 to suppose that he operates through a series of intermediate causes1 and that1 in consequence1 the origination of fresh species1 could it ever come under our cognizance1 would be found to be a natural1 in contradistinction to a miraculous process1--although we perceive no indications of any process actually in progress which is likely to issue in such a result4 ,in his address to the ,british ,association at ,cambridge1 7#ahde71 he said with respect to the author's hypothesis of the first step of organic creation--',the transition from an inanimate crystal to a globule capable of such endless organic and intellectual development1 is as great a step--as unexplained a one--as unintelligible to us--and in any sense of the word as miraculous1 as the immediate creation and introduction upon earth1 of every species and every individual would be6' ,the ,rev4 ,dr4 ,,pye ,,smith is next adduced3-- ',our most deeply investigated views of the ,divine ,government1' says he1 'lead to the conviction that it is exercised in the way of order1 or what we usually call law4 ,god reigns according to immutable principles1 that is by law1 in every part of his kingdom--the mechanical1 the intellectual1 and the moral2 and it appears to be most clearly a position arising out of that fact1 that a comprehensive germ which shall necessarily evolve all future developments1 down to the minutest atomic movements1 is a more suitable attribution to the ,deity1 than the idea of a necessity for irregular interferences4' ,lastly1 the reviewer of the ,vestiges in ,blackwood's ,magazine1 who is understood to be a naturalist of distinguished ability1 expresses himself in an equally decided manner3-- ,to reduce to a system the acts of creation1 or the development of the several forms of animal life1 no more impeaches the authorship of creation1 than to trace the laws by which the world is upheld1 and its phenomena perpetually renewed4 ,the presumption naturally rises in the mind1 that the same ,great ,being would adopt the same mode of action in both cases4444 ,to a mind accustomed1 as is every educated mind1 to regard the operations of ,deity as essentially differing from the limited1 sudden1 evanescent impulses of a human agent1 it is distressing to be compelled to picture to itself1 the power of ,god as put forth in any other manner than in those slow1 mysterious1 universal laws1 which have so plainly an eternity to work in2 it pains the imagination to be obliged to assimilate those operations1 for a moment1 to the brief energy of a human will1 or the manipulations of a human hand4444 ,no1 there is nothing atheistic1 nothing irreligious1 in the attempt to conceive creation1 as well as reproduction1 carried on by universal laws4 ,we have dwelt so much upon this matter because it is one in which popular feelings are likely to be most deeply interested4 ,we shall give the author1 too1 the benefit of his ,explanations on another point1 elucidating his former statement of the transmutation of a crop of oats into a crop of rye3-- ',at the request1' says ,dr4 ,lindley1 'of the ,marquis of ,bristol1 the ,reverend ,lord ,arthur ,hervey1 in the year #ahdc1 sowed a handful of oats1 treated them in the manner recommended1 by continually stopping the flowering stems1 and the produce1 in #ahdd1 has been for the most part ears of a very slender barley1 having much the appearance of rye1 with a little wheat1 and some oats2 samples of which are1 by the favour of ,lord ,bristol1 now before us4' ,the learned writer then adverts to the 'extraordinary1 but certain fact1 that in orchidaceous plants1 forms just as different as wheat1 barley1 rye1 and oats1 have been proved by the most rigorous evidence1 to be accidental variations of one common form1 brought about no one knows how1 but before our eyes1 and rendered permanent by equally mysterious agency4 ,then says ,reason1 if they occur in orchidaceous plants1 why should they not also occur in corn plants8 for it is not likely that such vagaries will be confined to one little group in the vegetable kingdom2 it is more rational to believe them to be a part of the general system of creation4444 ,how can we be sure1 that wheat1 rye1 oats1 and barley1 are not all accidental off-sets from some unsuspected species8' ,it may be so2 but this would only prove that the unsuspected species included greater varieties1 not that a really defined species was transmutable into another4 ,but it is a point upon which no satisfactory result can be arrived at1 since naturalists are not agreed in the classification of species1 nor what attributes constitute one4 ,the ,broomfield experiment is again brought forward1 as decisive of the power to originate new life from inorganic elements4 ,it will be remembered that ,mr4 ,,weekes1 of ,sandwich1 continued during three years to subject solutions to electric action1 and invariably found insects produced in these instances1 while they as invariably failed to appear where the electric action was not employed1 but every other condition fulfilled4 ,in a letter to the author of the ,vestiges--two are inserted1 one on the independent generation of fungi--,mr4 ,,weekes says-- ,one hundred and sixty-six days from the commencement of the experiment--the first acari seen in connexion therewith1 six in number and nearly full-grown1 were discovered on the outside of the open glass vessel4 ,on removing two pieces of card which had been laid over the mouth of this vessel1 several fine specimens were found inhabiting the under surfaces1 and others completely developed and in active motion here and there within the glass4 ,making my visit at an hour when a more favourable light entered the room1 swarms of acari were found on the cards1 about the glass tumbler1 both within and without1 and also on the platform of the apparatus4 ,at this identical hour ,dr4 ,j4 ,black favoured me with a call1 inspected the arrangements1 and received six living specimens of the acarus produced from solution in the open vessel4 ,specimens of the insect were sent to ,paris1 when they set a whole conclave of philosophers a-laughing1 because they were found to contain ova4 ,other specimens were sent to ,london1 but there their fate was sealed by their being found to be1 not a new species1 but one then abundant in the country4 ,for ourselves we think the experiment not conclusive4 ,we adopt ,,hume',s principle4 ,all but universal experience having established that life is ex ovo only1 we must have a proportionate body of counter evidence to establish a different mode of generation4 ,at all events1 ,mr4 ,,weekes',s protracted gestation of #aff days by his galvanic battery is not likely1 in the existing rage for despatch1 to supersede the existing routine of reproduction4 ,,london3 ,,printed ,,by ,c4 ,,whiting1 ,,beaufort ,,house1 ,,strand4 ,,the ,,atlas1 ,a ,general ,family ,newspaper and ,journal of ,literature4 99 99 99 99 99 ,this ,periodical1 which may be justly called a ,weekly ,cyclopdia of ,politics1 ,literature1 ,arts1 and ,science1 is published every ,saturday afternoon1 in time for the post1 containing the ,news of ,saturday4 99 99 99 99 99 ,,the ,,atlas ,,is ,,divided ,,into ,,two ,,principal ,,departments1 ,,news ,,and ,,literature1 ,and these are subdivided and classified with care and industry into heads of easy reference1 so that each particular subject is preserved distinct and entire4 ,the dimensions of the sheet1 which folds into sixteen large quarto-sized pages1 containing forty-eight columns1 afford this classification facilities which few other publications possess4 99 99 99 99 99 ,,news4 ,,parliamentary ,,debates reported on a scale of magnitude far exceeding other weekly ,journals4 ,,parliamentary ,,papers1 a digest of all ,parliamentary documents of obvious reference and popular utility4 ,,foreign ,,news1 the current events in foreign countries1 arranged in the form of historical narrative1 collated carefully from contemporary authorities1 and distributed under the heads of the different countries and colonies to which they belong4 ,,british ,,news1 a clear epitome of all domestic occurrences1 under the various heads of ,public ,meetings1 ,trade1 ,agriculture1 ,accidents and ,offences1 ,police1 ,proceedings of the ,courts of ,law and ,sessions1 ,court and ,fashionable ,news1 ,church and ,university ,intelligence1 ,military and ,naval ,affairs copiously given1 the ,money ,market1 and the miscellaneous news of the week up to midnight on ,saturday4 ,the ,local ,news of ,ireland and ,scotland1 under separate heads4 ,in the conduct of this department of the ,,atlas recourse is had to many exclusive sources of information1 and correspondents have been established who furnish expressly the latest intelligence4 ,the ,gazettes and ,tables of ,markets1 and all matters interesting to the ,commercial ,world1 are especially attended to4 ,preserving an independence in its editorial capacity1 the ,,atlas affords a faithful reflection of the opinions and proceedings of all political parties4 ,the attention that is observed in the purity of language and selection of subjects1 down to the minutest paragraph in the ,,atlas1 recommends it especially to the use of families and the guardians of youth2 and the copious details it affords of ,military and ,naval ,affairs1 invest it with valuable attractions for the members of these professions1 and the residents in the ,colonies4 ,,literature4 ,the ,contributions to this department are from the pens of ,professors and ,gentlemen of acknowledged reputation1 and are classified under the following heads3-- #a4--,,original ,,essays ,,on ,,men ,,and ,,things1 embodying a lively commentary on passing events and men and manners4 #b4--,,theatrical ,,criticisms upon the written and acted ,drama1 in which both are reviewed in a spirit of truth and perfect candour4 #c4--,,reviews of all new works of ability1 with numerous extracts4 ,independent and free from all literary and personal prejudices1 the opinions of the ,reviewers in the ,,atlas may be consulted with confidence in their integrity4 #d4--,,literary ,,memoranda1 notes of all novelties in literature abroad and at home1 and summary criticisms on all works of minor importance4 #e4--,,music ,,and ,,musicians1 or scientific criticisms on vocal and instrumental performers1 operas1 and new music1 on the ,continent as well as in ,england1 with occasional engraved illustrations4 #f4--;,,fine ,,arts1 ,weekly notices of pictorial exhibitions1 and critical descriptions of paintings1 drawings1 and engravings1 with commentaries on all new works of art4 #g4--,,scientific ,,notices1 or descriptions of improvements in ,mechanics and the experimental ,sciences1 illustrated occasionally by diagrams1 with an account of ,new ,patents1 ,meteorological ,tables1 ,proceedings of ,literary and ,scientific ,institutions1 c4 ,the ,literary division of the ,,atlas in the various branches has formed an era in the class of publications in which it ranks2 and exhibits a remarkable union of the essential features of the more elaborate ,reviews1 with the popular and practical objects of the ,general ,newspaper4 99 99 99 99 99 ,published for the ,proprietor1 at the office1 #f1 ,southampton-street1 ,strand1 ,london4--,price ,eight ,pence4 ,orders received by all ,newsmen throughout the ,kingdom4 ,in one volume octavo1 cloth lettered1 price ,five ,shillings1 ,,national ,,distress1 ,,its ,,causes ,,and ,,remedies2 ,a ,prize ,essay ,,as ,,originally ,,published ,,in ,,the ,,atlas4 99 99 99 99 99 ,by ,,samuel ,,laing1 ,esq41 ,jun41 ,late ,fellow of ,st4 ,john's1 ,cambridge4 99 99 99 99 99 ,,part ,i4 ,chap4 ,i4--,general ,considerations--,absence of the usual ,historical ,symptoms of ,national ,decline--,definition of the ,evils which ,threaten ,society4 ,chap4 ,,ii4--,official ,pauperism and ,unrecognised ,destitution--,evidence respecting the ,condition of the ,lower ,classes in ,large ,towns4 ,chap4 ,,iii4--,extent of ,destitution in ,large ,towns--,condition of ,hand-loom ,weavers and other ,classes of ,unskilled ,manufacturing ,operatives4 ,chap4 ,,iv4--,condition of ,class of ,agricultural ,labourers4 ,chap4 ,v4--,condition of ,classes of ,labouring ,population employed in ,mines1 ,fisheries1 ,canals1 ,railways1 c4 ,chap4 ,,vi4--,condition of ,classes ,superior to ,common ,labourers--,general ,view of ,society in ,great ,britain4 ,,part ,,ii4 ,chap4 ,i4--,general ,views--,modern ,theories of ,society--,effect and ,paramount ,importance of ,moral ,causes4 ,chap4 ,,ii4--,economical ,causes--,population--,theory of ,malthus4 ,chap4 ,,iii4--,economical ,causes1 continued--,revolution in the ,course of ,industry effected by ,machinery--,extension of ,manufactures--,factory ,system1 c4 ,chap4 ,,iv4--,foreign ,competition4 ,,part ,,iii4 ,chap4 ,i4--,free ,trade1 ,corn ,laws4 ,chap4 ,,ii4--,free ,trade1 continued--,new ,tariff1 ,provisions1 ,sugar1 c4 ,reciprocity ,system--,commercial ,treaties4 ,chap4 ,,iii4--,taxation4 ,chap4 ,,iv4--,currency and ,banking4 ,chap4 ,v4--,emigration4 ,chap4 ,,vi4--,poor ,laws4 ,chap4 ,,vii4--,sanitary and ,building ,regulations1 c4 ,chap4 ,,viii4--,education4 ,chap4 ,,ix4--,conclusion4 99 99 99 99 99 ,,london3 ,published by ,longman and ,co42 ,simpkin and ,marshall2 ,and ,whittaker and ,co4 also1 ,at the ,atlas ,office1 #f1 ,southampton-street1 ,strand4